alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### subpart 3—national institute of diabetes and digestive and kidney diseases
PETER M. KELLY 

F.LEIGHTON DURHAM III

KIRK L. PITTARD 

THAD D.SPALDING

MORGAN MCPHEETERS* 

OF COUNSEL:

CHRISTY L.WOLLIN

LEIGH PRICHARD BRADFORD

P.O. BOX 224626 | DALLAS,TEXAS 75222 | (214)946-8000 | (214)946-8433(FAX) 

1005 HEIGHTS BLVD. | HOUSTON,TEXAS 77008 | (713)529-0048 | (713)529-2498(FAX) 

www.texasappeals.com | www.kdplawfirm.com

June 3, 2015

Christopher A. Prine, Clerk

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

301 Fannin Street, Room 245

Houston, TX 77002

Re: Cause No. 14-14-00234-CV; Hardriders Motorcycle Club Association, 

et al. v. Hardriders, Inc., et al.

Dear Mr. Prine:

Please be advised that I will present the oral argument on behalf of 

Appellants in the above-referenced case which this Court has set for oral 

argument on Thursday, June 11, 2015 at 2:00 p.m.

Thank you.

Sincerely, 

/s/ Thad D. Spalding

Thad D. Spalding

TDS/kl

Cc: Efrem D. Sewell

Waverly R. Nolley

ACCEPTED

14-14-00234-cv

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

6/3/2015 10:50:35 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/3/2015 10:50:35 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
#### In the Matter of John G. Renkowski, Appellant, against James J. Macduff, as Commissioner of Motor Vehicles of the State of New York, Respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review respondent’s determination which revoked petitioner’s license to operate a motor vehicle. Order denying the application and dismissing the petition unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Wenzel, Acting P. J., Schmidt, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ.
§ 1204.13 Certificate of compliance. ( a ) The manufacturer or importer of any product subject to the standard must issue the certificate of compliance required by section 14(a) of the act. If the testing required by this subpart B of part 1204 has been performed by or for the foreign manufacturer of a product, the importer may rely on such tests to support the certificate of compliance if the importer is a resident of the United States or has a resident agent in the U.S., and the records are maintained in the U.S. The importer is responsible for ensuring that the foreign manufacturer's records show that all testing used to support the certificate of compliance has been performed properly with passing or acceptable results and that the records provide a reasonable assurance that all antennas imported comply with the standard.
( b ) A certificate of compliance must accompany each product or otherwise be furnished to any distributor or retailer to whom the product is delivered by the manufacturer or importer.
( c ) The certificate shall state: ( 1 ) That the product “complies with all applicable consumer product safety standards (16 CFR part 1204)”,
( 2 ) The name and address of the manufacturer or importer issuing the certificate, and
( 3 ) The date of manufacture and, if different from the address in paragraph (c)(2) of this section, the place of manufacture.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 15 
          - [ET Docket No. 03-237; FCC 03-289] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Proposed rule; correction.

# SUMMARY:

On January 21, 2004 (69 FR 2863), the Commission published proposed rules in the Notice of Inquiry and Notice of Proposed Rule Making. The Notice of Inquiry requests comment, information and research on a number of issues relating to the development and use of the interference temperature metric and for managing a transition from the current transmitter-based approach to the new interference temperature paradigm. The Notice of Proposed Rule Making proposes technical rules that would establish interference temperature limits and procedures for assessing the interference temperature to permit expanded unlicensed operation. This document contains a correction to the “ET Docket No.”, which was inadvertently published incorrectly. 

# DATES:

Comments must be filed on or before April 5, 2004, and reply comments must be filed on or before May 5, 2004. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Gary Thayer (202) 418-2290, John Reed (202) 418-2455, or Ahmed Lahjouji (202) 418-2061, Office of Engineering and Technology. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Federal Communications Commission published a document proposing to amend part 15 in the                     **Federal Register**                     of January 21, 2004, (69 FR 2863). This document corrects the                     **Federal Register**                     as it appeared. In FR Doc. 04-1192, published on January 21, 2004 (69 FR 2863), the Commission is correcting the docket no. “ET Docket No. 03-327” to reflect the correct docket no. “ET Docket No. 03-237”. In rule FR Doc. 04-1192 published on January 21, 2004 (69 FR 2863), the Commission is correcting ET Docket No. 03-327 to read as ET Docket No. 03-237:                 

On page 2863, in the second column, ET Docket No. 03-327 is corrected to read as ET Docket No. 03-237. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Marlene H. Dortch, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 04-2639 Filed 2-6-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
FILED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

October 28, 2015

ABELACOSTA, CLERK

HARLEM HAROLD LEWIS, HI

THE STATE OF TEXAS

No. AP-77,045

AP-77,045

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 10/28/2015 2:04:24 PM

Accepted 10/28/2015 2:28:36 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK

§ IN THE COURT

§

§ OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

§

§ AUSTIN, TEXAS

FINAL MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

COMES NOW, appellant, by and through his attorney ofrecord, Gerald E. Bourque, and in

accordance with Rule 10.5(b) of The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, hereby requests an

extension of time in which to file his Brief and would respectfully show:

1. Name of Trial Court: 351st District Court

2. Trial Court Style: 1428102, The State ofTexas v.

HARLEM HAROLD LEWIS, III

3. Offense: Capital Murder

4. Punishment assessed: Death

5. Present Filing Deadline: November 6, 2015

6. Length ofExtension Requested: 60 days

7. Number of Previous Extensions: Two by current counsel

8. Good Cause for this Extension is as follows: This is a capital murder case and

counsel was not the trial counsel. The record is voluminous and the case is complex.

Counsel was appointed to replace prior appellate counsel and has been studying the

entire record in order to identify potential issues, conduct the necessary research, and

complete the brief for appellant, which has been ongoing. The voluminous record

requires an inordinate amount oftime in order to complete these tasks. These tasks

are necessary to provide the effective assistance of counsel. Counsel has made

considerable progress and does not anticipate requesting any further extensions

in this complex case.
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, appellant respectfully files this motion before

the expiration of the filing deadline, and prays for the requested extension.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/Gerald E. Bourque

GERALD E. BOURQUE

Appointed Counsel for Appellant

Attorney at Law

24 Waterway Ave., Suite 660

The Woodlands, TX 77380

. (281)379-6901

FAX: (832) 813-0321

TBL #02716500

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Motion was served upon the

counsel for the State by U.S. Mail on the date offiling hereof.

/s/Gerald E. Bourque

GERALD E. BOURQUE
### §13452. Natural gas and electric heating and cooling technologies

#### (a) Program direction

(1) The Secretary shall conduct a 5-year program, in accordance with sections 13541 and 13542 of this title, on energy efficient natural gas and electric heating and cooling technologies for residential and commercial buildings.

(2) The natural gas heating and cooling program shall include activities on—

(A) thermally activated heat pumps, including absorption heat pumps and engine-driven heat pumps; and

(B) other advanced natural gas technologies, including fuel cells for residential and commercial applications.

(3) The electric heating and cooling program shall focus on—

(A) advanced heat pumps;

(B) thermal storage; and

(C) advanced electric HVAC (heating, ventilating, and air conditioning) and refrigeration systems that utilize replacements for chlorofluorocarbons.

#### (b) Proposals

Within 180 days after October 24, 1992, the Secretary shall solicit proposals for conducting activities under this section.

(Pub. L. 102–486, title XXI, §2102, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3068.)
§ 1015.15 Purpose and scope. ( a ) The regulations of this subpart provide information concerning the types of records which may be withheld from production and disclosure by the Consumer Product Safety Commission. These regulations also provide information on the method whereby persons submitting information to the Commission may request that the information be considered exempt from disclosure, and information concerning the Commission's treatment of documents submitted with a request that they be treated as exempt from disclosure.
( b ) No identifiable record requested in accordance with the procedures contained in this part shall be withheld from disclosure unless it falls within one of the classes of records exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552(b). The Commission will make available, to the extent permitted by law, records authorized to be withheld under 5 U.S.C. 552(b) unless the Commission reasonably foresees that disclosure would harm an interest protected by the exemption or disclosure is prohibited by law or otherwise exempted from disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(3). In this regard the Commission will not ordinarily release documents that provide legal advice to the Commission concerning pending or prospective litigation where the release of such documents would significantly interfere with the Commission's regulatory or enforcement proceedings.
( c ) Draft documents that are agency records are subject to release upon request in accordance with this regulation. However, in order to avoid any misunderstanding of the preliminary nature of a draft document, each draft document released will be marked to indicate its tentative nature. Similarly, staff briefing packages, which have been completed but not yet transmitted to the Commission by the Office of the Secretariat are subject to release upon request in accordance with this regulation. Each briefing package or portion thereof released will be marked to indicate that it has not been transmitted to or acted upon by the Commission. In addition, briefing packages, or portions thereof, which the Secretariat upon the advice of the Office of the General Counsel has determined would be released upon request in accordance with this regulation, will be made available for public inspection in an electronic format through the Commission's Web site at *https://www.cpsc.gov* promptly after the briefing package has been transmitted to the Commissioners by the Office of the Secretariat. Such packages will be marked to indicate that they have not been acted upon by the Commission.
( d ) The exemptions contained in 5 U.S.C. 552(b) will be interpreted in accordance with the applicable law at the time a request for production or disclosure is considered.
[82 FR 37010, Aug. 8, 2017]
### §10199. Payments to States and Indian tribes

#### (a) Payments

Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary shall make payments to each State or affected Indian tribe that has entered into an agreement pursuant to section 10195 of this title. The Secretary shall pay an amount equal to 100 percent of the expenses incurred by such State or Indian tribe in engaging in any monitoring, testing, evaluation, or other consultation and cooperation activity under section 10195 of this title with respect to any site. The amount paid by the Secretary under this paragraph shall not exceed $3,000,000 per year from the date on which the site involved was identified to the date on which the decontamination and decommission of the facility is complete pursuant to section 10197(h) of this title. Any such payment may only be made to a State in which a potential site for a test and evaluation facility has been identified under section 10193 of this title, or to an affected Indian tribe where the potential site has been identified under such section.

#### (b) Limitation

The Secretary shall make any payment to a State under subsection (a) only if such State agrees to provide, to each unit of general local government within the jurisdictional boundaries of which the potential site or effectively selected site involved is located, at least one-tenth of the payments made by the Secretary to such State under such subsection. A State or affected Indian tribe receiving any payment under subsection (a) shall otherwise have discretion to use such payment for whatever purpose it deems necessary, including the State or tribal activities pursuant to agreements entered into in accordance with section 10195 of this title. Annual payments shall be prorated on a 365-day basis to the specified dates.

(Pub. L. 97–425, title II, §219, Jan. 7, 1983, 96 Stat. 2253.)
```

[Federal Register: July 1, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 126)]
[Notices]               
[Page 38086]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr01jy10-49]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

 
Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date:  11 a.m., Friday, July 9, 2010.

Place:  1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status:  Closed.

Matters to be Considered:  Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person for More Information:  Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-
5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-16185 Filed 6-29-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
### Part A—Demonstration of Solar Heating and Cooling in Federal Buildings
EXHIBIT 31.1
 Certification
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TranS1 Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control            over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors
and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
    /s/ Richard Randall

Richard RandallPresident and Chief Executive Officer
§ 1630.32 Carpets and rugs with fire-retardant treatment. ( a ) For the purposes of this section the following definitions apply: ( 1 ) *Carpet* and *rug* mean “carpet” and “rug” as defined in § 1630.31(c).
( 2 ) *Fire-retardant treatment* means “fire-retardant treatment” as defined in the standard of subpart A of this part.
( b ) If a carpet or rug or small carpet or rug is manufactured, imported, or otherwise marketed or handled which has had a fire-retardant treatment or is made of fibers which have had a fire-retardant treatment, the letter “T” shall be set forth legibly and conspicuously, and shall appear at all times, on each label and/or invoice relating thereto pursuant to the requirements of the Textile Fiber Products Identification Act, 15 U.S.C. 70, *et seq.,* and the rules and regulations thereunder, whether or not such letter “T” appears elsewhere on said product. Samples, pieces, rolls, or squares used to promote or effect the sale of such carpet or rug are subject to the aforementioned requirements. As provided in the applicable portions of the aforesaid act and the rules and regulations thereunder, where a carpet or rug or a small carpet or rug; which has had a fire-retardant treatment or is made of fibers which have had a fire-retardant treatment, is sold to an ultimate consumer and was either custom made or commercially installed for such consumer, the labeling required by this section shall not apply with respect to the carpet or rug if an invoice or other paper relating thereto, containing the letter “T”, legibly and conspicuously written, is delivered to the consumer in due course of business.
( c ) No person subject to the Flammable Fabrics Act shall manufacture, import, distribute, or otherwise market or handle any carpet or rug or small carpet or rug, including samples, swatches, or specimens used to promote or effect the sale thereof, which is not in compliance with this section.
(Sec. 5 of the Act, 67 Stat. 112, as amended by 81 Stat. 570, 15 U.S.C. 1194)
|                                                        |                         |  |  |  |  |
|--------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|--|--|--|--|
| Name of Subsidiary                                     | Organized Under Laws of |
| American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania     | Pennsylvania            |
| Bantry Insurance Company                               | Illinois                |
| CNA Insurance Company (Europe) S.A.                    | Luxembourg              |
| CNA Insurance Company Limited                          | United Kingdom          |
| Columbia Casualty Company                              | Illinois                |
| Continental Casualty Company                           | Illinois                |
| Continental Reinsurance Corporation International, Ltd | Bermuda                 |
| Hardy Underwriting Limited                             | United Kingdom          |
| Inverin Insurance Company                              | Illinois                |
| National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford            | Illinois                |
| North Rock Insurance Company Limited                   | Bermuda                 |
| Surety Bonding Company of America                      | South Dakota            |
| The Continental Corporation                            | New York                |
| The Continental Insurance Company of New Jersey        | New Jersey              |
| The Continental Insurance Company                      | Pennsylvania            |
| Transportation Insurance Company                       | Illinois                |
| Universal Surety of America                            | South Dakota            |
| Valley Forge Insurance Company                         | Pennsylvania            |
| Western Surety Company                                 | South Dakota            |
#### Sotirios Christopoulos, Respondent, v. Spiros Liakas, Defendant. Jean A. Mantopoulos, Third-Party Claimant-Appellant.

While appellant’s proof was insufficient to establish his title to the property, a should have been directed pursuant to section 924 of the Civil Practice Act, since there was a sufficient showing of facts by the plaintiff to require a trial on the question of title. Appellant, if he so chooses, may assert his claim of title by intervening in the action instituted by the plaintiff and the Sheriff against the bank. Order modified to the extent of providing for a hearing on the question of title and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. Settle order. Present — Peck, P. J., Cohn, Callahan, Bastow and Rabin, JJ.
#### § 930.124 Computation of time.

The first day of any period of time allowed or prescribed by these rules, shall not be included in the computation of the designated period of time. The last day of the time period computed shall be included unless it is a Saturday, Sunday or a Federal holiday, in which case the period runs until the next day which is not one of the aforementioned days.
IN RESPONSE, PLEASE 

REFER TO: M150519 

 

May 26, 2015 

MEMORANDUM TO: Mark A. Satorius 

 Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Annette Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS – BRIEFING ON CUMULATIVE 

EFFECTS OF REGULATION AND RISK PRIORITIZATION 

INITIATIVES, MAY 19, 2015, COMMISSIONERS’ CONFERENCE 

ROOM, ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH, ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND 

(OPEN TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE) 

The Commission was briefed by an external panel and the NRC staff on issues related to the 

cumulative effects of regulation (CER) and the risk prioritization initiative (RPI), including the 

staff’s identified lessons learned and possible approaches for implementing the RPI, as well as 

licensee experiences with RPI pilot projects. The external panel included John Butler, Senior 

Director of Strategic Programs, Nuclear Energy Institute; Michael Meier, Vice President of 

Regulatory Affairs, Southern Nuclear Operating Company; Otto Gustafson, Director Regulatory 

and Performance Improvement, Palisades Nuclear Plant; and David Lochbaum, Director, 

Nuclear Safety Project, Union of Concerned Scientists. 

Further guidance will be provided to the staff in the Staff Requirements Memorandum for 

SECY-15-0050, “Cumulative Effects of Regulation Process Enhancements and Risk 

Prioritization Initiative.” 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA 

 OIG 

 OPA 

 Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR
#### § 309.4 Preemption.

Inconsistent state and local regulations are preempted to the extent they would frustrate the purposes of this part.