alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
[MULTIPLIER]                                     1,000
<CASH>                                         154,685
<SECURITIES>                                    14,939
<RECEIVABLES>                                  238,658
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,238
<INVENTORY>                                    422,791
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               847,408
<PP&E>                                         999,862
<DEPRECIATION>                                 235,295
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,672,638
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          466,484
<BONDS>                                        806,412
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     340,167
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,672,638
<SALES>                                      3,010,386
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,018,872
<CGS>                                        2,435,377
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,784,840
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                48,655
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              43,121
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 88,940
<INCOME-TAX>                                       242
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             88,698
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    88,698
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### §12204. Regulations by Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board

#### (a) Issuance of guidelines

Not later than 9 months after July 26, 1990, the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board shall issue minimum guidelines that shall supplement the existing Minimum Guidelines and Requirements for Accessible Design for purposes of subchapters II and III of this chapter.

#### (b) Contents of guidelines

The supplemental guidelines issued under subsection (a) shall establish additional requirements, consistent with this chapter, to ensure that buildings, facilities, rail passenger cars, and vehicles are accessible, in terms of architecture and design, transportation, and communication, to individuals with disabilities.

#### (c) Qualified historic properties

#### (1) In general

The supplemental guidelines issued under subsection (a) shall include procedures and requirements for alterations that will threaten or destroy the historic significance of qualified historic buildings and facilities as defined in 4.1.7(1)(a) of the Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards.

#### (2) Sites eligible for listing in National Register

With respect to alterations of buildings or facilities that are eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places under division A of subtitle III of title 54, the guidelines described in paragraph (1) shall, at a minimum, maintain the procedures and requirements established in 4.1.7(1) and (2) of the Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards.

#### (3) Other sites

With respect to alterations of buildings or facilities designated as historic under State or local law, the guidelines described in paragraph (1) shall establish procedures equivalent to those established by 4.1.7(1)(b) and (c) of the Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards, and shall require, at a minimum, compliance with the requirements established in 4.1.7(2) of such standards.

(Pub. L. 101–336, title V, §504, July 26, 1990, 104 Stat. 370; Pub. L. 113–287, §5(k)(5), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3270.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (b), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 101–336, July 26, 1990, 104 Stat. 327, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 12101 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

2014—Subsec. (c)(2). Pub. L. 113–287 substituted "division A of subtitle III of title 54" for "the National Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.)".
### Part E—Studies
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350   Michael V. Shustek, as Chief Executive Officer and Director of Vestin Mortgage, Inc., the sole manager of Vestin Fund III, LLC (the Registrant), and Michael V. Shustek, as Interim Chief Financial Officer of Vestin Mortgage, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Registrants Report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  Date: November 10, 2010  /s/ Michael V. ShustekMichael V. ShustekChief Executive Officer and Director*of Vestin Mortgage, Inc., sole Manager of the Registrant  Date: November 10, 2010  /s/ Michael V. ShustekMichael V. ShustekInterim Chief Financial Officer**of Vestin Mortgage, Inc., sole Manager of the Registrant  * Michael V. Shustek functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  **Michael V. Shustek functions as the equivalent of Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-11099 c/w No. 97-11122 c/w No. 97-11125 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LEON JOSEPH STEPHENS, also known as Joe Blow,

Defendant-Appellant;

ANDRA DEMON HUBBARD, also known as Pooh,

Defendant-Appellant;

LAMARCUS TYRONE WILLIAMS, also known as T-Dog,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:97-CR-50-1-A USDC No. 4:97-CR-50-4 USDC No. 4:97-CR-50-A-3

- - - - - - - - - - July 2, 1998 Before DUHÉ, DEMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Leon Joseph Stephens, Andra Demon Hubbard, and Lamarcus Tyrone

Williams appeal the district court’s denial of their motions toNo. 97-11099 No. 97-11122 No. 97-11125

-2-

suppress evidence.

Appellants contend that the warrant was based on an affidavit

that contained material omissions critical to a finding of probable

cause. The appellants have not shown that any omission in the

affidavit was intentional or reckless or that intent should be

inferred because the omitted information was critical to a finding

of probable cause. S ee United States v. Cronan , 937 F.2d 163, 165

(5th Cir. 1991).

Stephens also contends that warrant was issued based on a

“bare bones” affid avit. The affidavit supporting the search

warrant was not so lacking in indi cia of probable cause as to

render official belief in its existence entirely unreasonable. S ee

United States v. McKnigh t , 953 F.2d 898, 905 (5th Cir.

1992)(holding that an affidavit based on the personal observations

of drug manufacturing by an informant who had fu rnished reliable

information in the past was not “bare bones”). Stephens has

offered no evidence to support his claimthat the magistrate

abandoned his judicial role in issuing the warrant.

Appellants have not shown that the good-faith exception to the

exclusionary rule does not apply. Thus, the evidence obtained by

Gladney in objectively reasonable good-faith reliance upon the

search warrant is admi ssible. S ee United States v. Satterwhite
,
980 F.2d 317, 320-21 (5th Cir.1992). The district court did not

err in denying the appellants’ motions to suppress.No. 97-11099 No. 97-11122 No. 97-11125

-3-

AFFIRMED.
#### TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY et al., Movant, v. Stanley LAKES, Opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

January 10, 1950.

George T. fioss for movant.

Carl Eversole for opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for appeal is denied and judgment affirmed.
### SUBCHAPTER II—LOW-INCOME HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE
No: 16-028 May 12, 2016

Contact: Maureen Conley, 301-415-8200

NRC Proposes $42,000 Civil Penalty for Connecticut Company 

for Willful Import, Possession and Distribution Violations

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has proposed a $42,000 fine against Plus LLC of 

Stamford, Conn., for willful violations of requirements related to importing, possessing and distributing

watches containing radioactive material.

The NRC found the company imported watches containing the radioactive isotope tritium and 

distributed them to unlicensed individuals in violation of the NRC’s import, possession and distribution 

regulations. Tritium watches are exempt from regulation once they are initially distributed, so retailers 

and consumers do not need a license to own them; however, the initial distribution must be made under 

an NRC license to ensure that the devices meet safety requirements.

The watches contain a small amount of tritium encapsulated in glass vials. The radioactive 

material ionizes a luminescent coating on the inside of the glass vial to produce light, so that the 

markers on the watch face and hands can be seen in low light.

The company and the NRC held a pre-decisional enforcement conference March 14 to discuss 

the violations. The amount of the fine provides Plus LLC credit for taking corrective actions, which 

include ceasing distribution of the watches, and obtaining possession and exempt-distribution licenses 

from the NRC. But the amount is double the $21,000 base fine because the company made a deliberate 

decision not to follow NRC requirements for economic benefit.

Plus LLC has the option to deny the violation, or to seek mediation under the NRC’s alternative 

dispute resolution program. The company is not required to provide a written response to NRC’s May 3

notice of violation.
§ 2.16 Custodians. ( a ) *Designation.* The Commission shall designate a custodian and one or more deputy custodians for material to be delivered pursuant to compulsory process in an investigation, a purpose of which is to determine whether any person may have violated any provision of the laws administered by the Commission. The custodian shall have the powers and duties prescribed by section 21 of the FTC Act. Deputy custodians may perform all of the duties assigned to custodians. The appropriate Bureau Directors, Deputy Directors, Associate Directors in the Bureau of Consumer Protection, Assistant Directors in the Bureau of Competition, Regional Directors or Assistant Regional Directors shall take the action required by section 21(b)(7) of the FTC Act if it is necessary to replace a custodian or deputy custodian.
( b ) *Copying of custodial documents.* The custodian designated pursuant to section 21 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (subject to the general supervision of the Executive Director) may, from among the material submitted, select the material the copying of which is necessary or appropriate for the official use of the Commission, and shall determine, the number of copies of any such material that are to be reproduced. Copies of material in the physical possession of the custodian may be reproduced by or under the authority of an employee of the Commission designated by the custodian.
( c ) Material produced pursuant to the Federal Trade Commission Act, while in the custody of the custodian, shall be for the official use of the Commission in accordance with the Act; but such material shall upon reasonable notice to the custodian be made available for examination by the person who produced such material, or his duly authorized representative, during regular office hours established for the Commission.
[45 FR 36343, May 29, 1980, as amended at 46 FR 26291, May 12, 1981; 48 FR 41376, Sept. 15, 1983; 50 FR 53305, Dec. 31, 1985]
No: II-16-017 April 6, 2016

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416

NRC Schedules Open House to Discuss Agency’s 

2015 Assessment of Hatch Nuclear Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled an open house for Wednesday, April 13

to discuss the agency’s assessment of the Hatch nuclear plant’s two units in 2015. 

The plant, operated by Southern Nuclear Operating Co., is located near Baxley, Ga., about 20 

miles south of Vidalia. 

The open house, which will include informational posters, is scheduled from 4 - 6 p.m. in 

Southeastern Technical College Auditorium, 3001 East 1st St., in Vidalia.

NRC resident inspectors and other staff members will be available to answer questions about the 

safety performance and regulatory oversight of the Hatch plant, as well as highlights of NRC

inspections. 

“We invite the public to visit with us and find out what we’re doing to ensure Hatch and other 

nuclear plants are operated safely,” said NRC Region II Administrator Cathy Haney. “These annual 

meetings offer an opportunity for everyone, and especially people who live near the plant, to learn 

about our inspection and oversight programs.”

The NRC’s annual assessment letter to plant officials addressing the 2015 Hatch plant 

performance will serve as the main focus of the open house, but NRC staff members will be available 

to answer other questions about the NRC’s role at the plant. 

The NRC review of the Hatch plant for 2015 concluded that it operated in a manner that 

preserved public health and safety and protected the environment. Because of that performance, it will 

continue to receive the detailed routine or baseline inspections this year that all nuclear power plants

receive.

The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess plant 

performance. The colors start with green, which has very low safety significance, and then progress to 

white, yellow or red, based on the significance of the issues. All inspection findings and performance 

indicators for Hatch were green in 2015.

Current performance information for both Hatch Unit 1 and Unit 2, as well as more detailed 

information about NRC inspection and oversight, is available on the NRC website. Specific plant 

performance indicators and inspection reports are updated at least quarterly.
### **CHAPTER 122—NATIVE HAWAIIAN HEALTH CARE**

Sec.
11701.
Findings.
11702.
Declaration of policy.
11703.
Comprehensive health care master plan for Native Hawaiians.
11704.
Functions of Papa Ola Lokahi.
11705.
Native Hawaiian health care systems.
11706.
Administrative grant for Papa Ola Lokahi.
11707.
Administration of grants and contracts.
11708.
Assignment of personnel.
11709.
Native Hawaiian health scholarships.
11710.
Report.
11711.
Definitions.
11712.
Rule of construction.
11713.
Compliance with Budget Act.
11714.
Severability.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

As originally enacted, this chapter was comprised of Pub. L. 100–579 (§§1–12) and subtitle D (§§2301–2312) of title II of Pub. L. 100–690, which enacted substantially identical sections and which were both known as the Native Hawaiian Health Care Act of 1988. Pub. L. 102–396, title IX, §9168, Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1948, subsequently amended the Act generally. As so amended, the Act was renamed the Native Hawaiian Health Care Improvement Act and consists of sections 1 to 16 which enacted this chapter, repealed section 1621d of Title 25, Indians, and enacted provisions set out as a Short Title note under section 11701 of this title. For purposes of codification, sections 1 to 16 are considered to be sections of Pub. L. 100–579 only.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
[MULTIPLIER]                                     1,000
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         128,989
<SECURITIES>                                    14,889
<RECEIVABLES>                                   87,964
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,118
<INVENTORY>                                    280,962
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               528,015
<PP&E>                                         785,342
<DEPRECIATION>                                 218,834
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,157,409
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          298,341
<BONDS>                                        583,197
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     218,261
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,157,409
<SALES>                                        822,278
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               826,100
<CGS>                                          688,981
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  799,783
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,970
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,623
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (42,522)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       152
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (42,674)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (42,674)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
----

**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION        OF**

**CHIEF        EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT        TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| (1) | the                  Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter                  ended                  September 30, 2006 as filed on the date hereof with the Securities                  and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the                  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                  Act of                  1934, as amended; and |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                  Ted T.H. Jeong      |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------|
| Ted                  T.H. Jeong          |   |
| Chief                  Financial Officer |   |

----
#### Bernard Klein, Appellant, v. Asher N. Shapiro et al., Respondents.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, without costs.
#### A. C. *&*H. M. Hall Realty Company, 143 West 72nd Street, New York City, Respondent, v. V. A. C. Corporation et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 213.]
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 374 

To implement equal protection under the 14th article of amendment to the 

Constitution for the right to life of each born and preborn human person. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 20, 2011 

Mr. HUNTER (for himself, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, 

Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. GARRETT, Mr. DAVIS of Kentucky, Mr. BURTON

of Indiana, Mr. BRADY of Texas, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. DUNCAN of Tennessee, Mr. JONES, Mr. MCCAUL, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, Mr. PENCE, Mr. 

HURT, Mr. ROSS of Florida, Mrs. SCHMIDT, Mr. FLEMING, Mr. 

MCCOTTER, Mr. TERRY, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. COLE, Mr. HARPER, Mr. 

AKIN, Mr. ROE of Tennessee, Mr. LONG, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. BARTON

of Texas, Mr. LANDRY, Mr. LATTA, Mr. SCALISE, Mr. RIGELL, Mr. 

KELLY, Mr. JORDAN, Mr. LUETKEMEYER, Mr. GIBBS, Mr. HUELSKAMP, 

Mr. KLINE, Mr. CANSECO, Mr. FLORES, Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina, 

Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California, Mrs. HARTZLER, Mr. HALL, Mr. 

HERGER, Mr. BUCSHON, Mr. POMPEO, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. 

FARENTHOLD, Mr. LAMBORN, Mrs. MILLER of Michigan, Mr. 

MARCHANT, and Mr. MCKEON) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To implement equal protection under the 14th article of 

amendment to the Constitution for the right to life of 

each born and preborn human person. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 374 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Life at Conception 

3 Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. RIGHT TO LIFE. 

5 To implement equal protection for the right to life 

6 of each born and preborn human person, and pursuant 

7 to the duty and authority of the Congress, including Con8 gress’ power under article I, section 8, to make necessary 

9 and proper laws, and Congress’ power under section 5 of 

10 the 14th article of amendment to the Constitution of the 

11 United States, the Congress hereby declares that the right 

12 to life guaranteed by the Constitution is vested in each 

13 human being. However, nothing in this Act shall be con14 strued to require the prosecution of any woman for the 

15 death of her unborn child. 

16 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. 

17 For purposes of this Act: 

18 (1) HUMAN PERSON; HUMAN BEING.—The 

19 terms ‘‘human person’’ and ‘‘human being’’ include 

20 each and every member of the species homo sapiens 

21 at all stages of life, including the moment of fer22 tilization, cloning, or other moment at which an indi23 vidual member of the human species comes into 

24 being. 

25 (2) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ used in the 

26 14th article of amendment to the Constitution of the 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 374 IH

1 United States and other applicable provisions of the 

2 Constitution includes the District of Columbia, the 

3 Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and each other terri4 tory or possession of the United States. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS