Basic Data on Visits

to Family Planning

Services Sites:

United States, 1980

This report presents National estimates of

medical family planning visits by women

to organized family planning service sites in

1980. Family planning visits are categorized

by visit status, social and demographic

characteristics, and the utilization of medical

family planning services.

Data From the National Health Survey

Series 13, No. 68

DHHS Publication No. (PHS) 82–1 729

U.S. Department of Health and Human Setvices

Public Health Service

Office of Health Research, Statistics,

and Technology

National Center for Health Statistics

Hyattsville, Md.

.hdy 1982
COPYRIGHT INFORMATION

The National Center for Health Statistics hss obtained permwsion from the

copyright holders to reproduce certain quoted material m this report.

Further reproduction of this material ia prohibited without specific permission

of the copyright holders. All other material contained in the report is in

the public domain and may be used and reprinted without special

permission; citation as to source, however, is appreciated.

SUGGESTEO CITATION

National Center for Health Statistics, B. L. Hudson: Basic data on

v!sits to family planning service sites: United States, 1980. Vita/ and Hea/tb

Statistics. Series 13, No. 68. DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) 82–1 729. Public Health

Service. Washington. U.S. Government Printing Office, July 1982.

Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data

Hudson, Bettie L.

Basic data on visita to family planning services sites, United States, 1980.

(Vital and health statistics. Series 13, Data from the national health

survey ; no. 68) (DHHS publication ; no. (PHS) 82–1 729)

* Supt. of Dots. no.: HE 20.6209:13168

\

1. Birth control clinics—United States—Utilization—Statistics. 2. Birth

control—United States—Statistics. 3. Women—Medical care—United

States—Statistics. 4. Young women—Medical care—United States

—Statistics. 5. Adolescent girls—Medical care—United States—Statistics.

1. National Center for Health Statistics (U.S.). Il. Title. Ill. Series.

IV. Series: DHHS publication ; no. (PHS) 82–1 729. [DNLM: 1. Family

Planning—United States—Statistics. W2 A N148vm no.68]

HQ766.5.U5H8 1982 362.1 ‘2 82–600202

ISBN 0-8406-0261-8

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing 06ice, Washington, D.C. 20402
National Center for Health Statistics

ROBERT A. ISRAEL, Acting Director

JACOB J. FELDMAN, Ph.D., Associate Director for

Analysis and Epidemiology

GAIL F. FISHER, Ph.D., Associate Director for the

Cooperative Health Statistics System

GARRIE J. LOSEE, Associate Directorfor Data

Processing and Services

ALVAN O. ZA.IU4TE, Ph.D., Assistant Directorfor

International Statistics

E. EARL BRYANT, Associate Director for Interview

and Examination Statistics

ROBERT C. HUBE~AssociateDirectorforManagenzent

MONROE G. SIRKEN, Ph.D., Associate Director for

Research and Methodology

PETER L. HURLEY, Associate Directorfor Vital and

Health Care Statistics

ALICE HAYWOOD, Information Oficer

VM and Health Care Statistics Program

PETER L. HURLEY, Associate Director

GLORIA KAPANTAIS, Assistant to the Director for

Data Policy, Planning, and Analysis

Division of Health Care Statistics

PETER L. HURLEY, Acting Director

JOAN F. VAN NOS TRAND, Deputy Director

STEWART C. RICE, Chie~ Fanzily Planning

Statistics Branch
Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

Highlights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

List of detailed tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .’. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

1. Technical notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

ll. Definitions ofterms usedin this report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30

Ill.Clinic Visit Record for Family Planning Servic& . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32

...

Ill
Symbols Used in Tables

..- Data not available

.,. Category not applicable

Quantity zero

0.0 Quantity more than zero but less than

0.05

z Quantity more than zero but less than

500 when data are rounded to thousands

*

Figure does not meet standards of

reliability or precision

# Figure suppressed to comply with

confidentiality requirements
Basic Data on Visits to

Family Planning Service Sites

By Bettie L. Hudson, formerly of Division of Health

Care Statistics

Introduction

This reportpresentsnationalestimateson medical

family planning visits by women to family planning

service sites in the United States in 1980: These

estimatesarebased on datafrom theNational ReportingSystemforFamilyPlanningServices,whichfocuses

on thesociodemographiccharacteristicsof thepatients

aswellasutilizationof medicalfamilyplanningservices.

The sociodemographic data are presentedin tables 1

through6, 11, and 12. Data on utilizationof medical

family planning services are presented in tables 7

through 10.

TheNationalReportingSystemforFamilyPlanning

Servicesis a sample surveyconductedby theDivision

of Health Care Statisticsof the National Center for

HealthStatistics.The systembeganin 19721to collect

data on visits to family planning service sites in the

United Statesand some of its territories.

The basic samplingunitfor theNationalReporting

System for Family Planning Services is the family

planning visit. The survey includes medical family

planning visits made by women to family planning

servicesites,whicharethose operatedby public health

departments,hospitals,thePlannedParenthoodFederationof America, Inc., afllliatesandotheragenciesthat

provide medical family planning services. Medical

familyplanningvisitsto privatephysicians’ offices are

excluded from the survey, as are visits to military

clinics.Visitsmadeto familyplanningservicesitesonly

for pregnancyor venerealdisease testsarenot counted

as visits,nor are visitswhose sole purpose is obtaining

contraceptive suppliesor counseling.

The survey employs a two-stage samplingdesign

(see appendixI). Surveyparticipationis requiredforall

facilitiesselectedfor the sample thatare supportedby

Public Health Service family planningservice grants;

however, participation is voluntary for non-federally

funded service sites selected for the sample. The

proportionof eachsamplesite’svisitsthataresystematicallyselectedfor inclusioninthesurveyvariesaccording

to the site’s reported annualvisit volume and its geographic location. Data horn the U.S. territories of

Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands are excluded. Family planning visits by males are also

excluded because the numberof visitsby males is too

small for reliable estimates, although data on these

visitshavebeen presentedin otherNational Centerfor

HealthStatisticspublications.z~Becausetheestimates

inthisreportarebased on asampleratherthanon afi,dlcountsurvey,theyaresubjectto samplingvariability.A

detailed discussion of the National Reporting System

for Family PlanningServicessurveymethodology and

the samplingvariation associated with the estimates,

along with definitions of certain terms used in this

report, is included in appendixes I and II.

The Clinic Visit Record is thebasic datacollection

formusedintheNationalReportingSystemfor Family

PlanningServices.Data also arebased on information

obtained from observation and from medical records.

Service sitesthatcollected surveydatathrougha computerizedrecordsystemgenerallyuselocally developed

forms thatcontainthe same Clinic Visit Record items.

The Clinic Visit Record contains 14 items, covering

basic sociodemographic information, medical family

planning services, and contraceptive usage (see ap

pendix III for facsimile).

Data have been publishedfor 1978 and 1979 from

the National Reporting System for Family Planning

Servicesthatfocus on visits to family planningservice

sites,%Gthe numberof teenagersand women who use

organizedfamilyplanningservices,T$andpatientprofile.g The National Center for Health Statisticsoffers

other estimates on the utilization of family planning

services.For example,theNationalAmbulatoryMedical Care Survey,10 conducted by the Division of

HealthCare Statistics,presentsdataon visitsto officebased physicians,includingfamilyplanningvisits.The

National Surveyof Family Growth,l 1conductedbythe

Division of Vital Statistics, provides more detailed

statisticson women who made familyplanningvisitsto

theirphysiciansor to organizedfamilyplanningservice

1
sitesin the 3 years prior to each survey. UIIW those in years of age who were ever married or who were never

the other two surveys, which use information from the married and had offspring living in the household. The

providers of family planning services, data for the estimates on family planning visits may differ among

National Survey of Family Growth were collected the three data systems because of differences in the

from recipients of the services, by means of personal collection procedures, the population sampled, and the

interviews with a national sample of women 15-44 deffitions used in the survey.
Highlights

● According to data from the National Reporting

Systemfor Family Planning Services,womenmade

an estimated 9,261,000 medical family planning

visitsto nonmilitary family planning service sitesin

1980, about 8percentmorethanin 1979(table 1).IZ

● Ahnost 81 percent of visits were made by women

retig to the family planning service site, while

fewerthan one-ilfth of all reported visits were made

by women visiting the family planning service site

for the first time (table 2).

● About 89 percent of all visits were made by women

under 30 years of age. Of these visits teenagers

accounted for 33.3 percent (table 3).

● An estimated 70.5 percent of visits were made by

white women and 27.4 percent by black women.

The remaining 2.1 percent were made by women of

other races (table 4).

● Visits made by women of Hispanic origin (determined independently of race) accounted for 12.6

percent of all visits and about the same for initial

and return visits (continuation and readmission

visits) to the service site (table 4).

● About 80 percent of all visits were made by women

wi@ 12 years of education or less. Twenty-seven

percent of all visits made were by women still in

school (tables 1 and 11).

● An estimated 14 percent of all visits, 15 percent of

return visits, and 12.0 percent of initial visits to

farnilyplanning service sitesin 1980 were made by

women livingin familiesreceivingpublic assistance

income (table 4).

● About 57 percent of all visits to family planning

service sites were made by women who each had

had at least one pregnancy, as were about 44

percent of initial visits and almost 60 percent for

return visits (table 5).

. Approximately 54 percent of all reported visits

were made by women who never had had a live

birth, as were about 65 percent for initial visits and

about 52 percent for return visits (table 5).

● About 82 percent of all reported visits were made

by women whohadusedacontraceptive method. Jn

about 53 percent of all visits, women who had used

apriormethod returned to the same family planning

service site from which the prior method was received (table 12).

● The contraceptive pill was adopted or continued for

about 68 percent of all reported visits. The next

most popular contraceptive methods were the intrauterine device (7.2 percent) and the diaphragm (6.5

percent) (tables 7 and 8).

● In about 89 percent of all visits to ftiy planning

service sites, some method of contraception was

adopted or continued. This wastrue of81.3 percent

of initial visits and 90.2 percent of return visits

(table 6).

● There were 40.3 million medical services provided

during 9.3 million female family planning visits.

Four core medical services-blood pressure check,

pelvic examination, breast examination, and Pap

smear-accounted for 54.7 percent of all medical

services provided to contraceptors (tables 9 and

lo).
References

lNationd Center for Health Statistics, B. J. HaupC Background

and development of the National Reporting System for Family

Planning Services. Vital and Health Statistics. Series 1, No. 13.

DHEW Pub. No. (PHS) 78–13 13. Public Health Service. Washington. U.S. Government Printing Office, Apr. 1978.

2National Center for Health StatisticS, B. J. Haupk 1974 Annual

Report, National Reporting System for Family Planning Services.

DHEW Pub. No. (HRA) 77–1238. Health Resources Administration. Washington. U.S. Government Printing (Mice, May 1977.

3National Center for Health Statistics, B. J. Haupti 1975 Annual

Report, National Reporting System for Family Planning Services.

DHEW Pub. No. (Hl&4) 78–1238. Health Resources Administration. Washington. U.S. Government Printing OfXce, Sept. 1977.

4National Center for Health Statistics: 1976 provisional data from

the National Reporting System for Family Planning Services, Jan.

1976–Dec. 1976. Unpublished document.

5Nation~ Center for Health Statistics, B. L. Hudson: Visits @

family planning service sites: United States, 1978. Advance Data

From Vital andHeaMz Statistics, No. 72. DHHS Pub. No. (PHS)

81-1250. Public Health Service. Hyattsville, Md. June 29, 1981.

6National Center for Health Statistics, J. Fos~r and E. Eckard:

Family planning visits by teenagers: United States, 1978. Vital and

Health Statistics. Series 13–No. 58, DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) 81-

1719. Public Health Service. Hyattsville, Md. Aug. 1981.

7Nation~ center for Health Statistics, E. Eckard: Teenagers who

use organized family planning services: United States, 1978. Vital

and Health Statistics. Series 13–No. 57. DHHS Pub. No. (PHS)

81-1718. Public Health Service. Hyattsville, Md. Aug. 1981.

8National center for Health Statistics, E. Eckard: women whouse

organized family planning services: United States, 1979. Vital and

Health Statistics. Series 13-No. 62, DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) 82-

1723. Public Health Service. Hyattsville, Md. Mar. 1982.

9National Center for Health Statistics, J. Foste~ Patient profile,

National Reporting System for Family Planning Serwices: United

States. Advance Data From Vital and Health Statistics, No. 73.

DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) 81–1250. Public Health Service. Hyattsville, Md. June 24, 1981.

locational Center for Health Statistics, B. K. Cypress: ~lce visits

by women, the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: United

States, 1977. Vital and Health Statistics. Series 13–No. 45.

DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) 80–1796. Public Health Service. Hyattsville, Md. Mar. 1980.

1lNation~ cen~r for Health Statistics, W. D. Moshe~ Contraceptive utilization:United States, 1976. Vital andHealth Statkwr”cs.

Series 23-No. 7. DHHS Pub. No.(PHS)81-1983. Public Health

Service. Hyattsville, Md. Mar. 1981.

12National Center for Health Statistics, B. Bloom: Visits to family

planning clinics: United States. Advance Data From Vital and

Health Statistics, No. 74. DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) 81-1250.

Public Health Service. Hyattsville, Md. Sept. 4, 1981.

13Nat.ional Center for Health Statistics: Final Repoti of Data

Quality Study for the National Reporting System for Family

Planning Services. Informatics, Inc., Aug. 1980. Unpublished

document.

4
List of detailed tables

1. Number and percent distribution of family planning visits for

females by selected charecteristica, according to age: United

Statea, 1980 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2. Number and percent distribution of family planning viaite for

females by selected charectenatics, according to age: United

States, 1980 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3. Number and percent distribution of family planning viaite for

famales by selected characteristics, according to a9e: United

Ststaa, 1980., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4. Number and percent distribution of family planning visits for

famales by selected characteristics, according to race and Hispanic

origin: United Ststes,1980 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5. Number and percent distribution of fsmily planning visita for

femalea by selected characteristics, according to race and Hispanic

origin: United States, 1980..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6. Number and percent distribution of family planning visits for

females by selected characterietica, according to race and Hispanic

origim United Statas,1980 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7.

6

8.

8

9.

10

10.

12

11.

13

12.

15

Number of family planning visits forfemalea byselacted characteristics, according to contraceptive method adopted or continued

United Stetes, 1980 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

Percent distribution of family planning visita for femalaa by

aelectad characteristic, according to ccmtraceptive method

sdopted or continued United Statea, 1680 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

Number of family planning vieiteforfemalea byviaitatetua, medical

services provided, and contraceptive method adopted or continued United Statea,1980 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

Percent distribution of family planning visits for femalea by visit

status and medical services provided, according to contraceptive

method adopted or continued United Statea, 1980 . . . . . . . . . . 20

Number and percent distribution of family planning visits for

females by selected characteristics, according to education:

United States, 1980 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

Number and percent distribution of family planning viaite for

femalea by selected characteristics, according to educatiom

United Stitea. 1980 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Table 1. Number and parcent distribution of family planning visits for femalea by selected characteristic, according to ace: United Stateat 1.980

Age Aoe“Selected characteristics All Atl

ages Under 20-24 25-29 30 years ages Under 20-24 25-29

20 years

30 yaars

yaars years and ovar 20 vaars vears vears and ovar

All visits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Race

White . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Black . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Hispanic origin

Hispanic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Non-Hispanic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Education

Lesathan 12 years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

12 yeara . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

13yeara or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Student atatua

Student . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Not a student . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Public assistance income

Family raceivea public aaaistance income . . . .

Family doea not receive public aaaistance income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Initial visita . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Race

White . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Black . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Hispanic origin

Hispanic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Non-Hispanic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Education

Lesathan 12 yeara . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

12yaara . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

13yeara or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Student atatua

Student . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Notaatudant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Public assistance income

Family receives public assistance income . . . .

Family does not receive public assistance income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Return viaits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Race

White . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Black . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Hispanic origin

Hispanic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Non-Hispanic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number in thousands

9,261

6,529

2,540

192

1,168

8,093

3,692

3,647

1,921

2,496

6,764

1,313

7,948

1.779

1,373

350

56

227

1,552

B14

619

347

672

1,108

213

1,567

7,481

5,156

2,190

136

940

6,541

3,082

2,195

839

46

226

2,854

1,934

204

1,679

1,403

404

2.678

864

677

186

21

73

811

574

252

58

538

346

96

788

2,198

1,519

653

27

155

2,043

3,481

2,517

909

65

408

3,083

884

1,567

1,040

651

2,840

498

2,993

529

419

94

16

79

450

130

220

178

109

421

66

464

2,962

2,098

815

48

329

2,633

1,667

1,143

480

44

288

1,379

463

728

475

122

1,545

254

1,413

219

168

41

10

40

179

58

90

71

18

201

30

189

1.448

975

439

34

247

1,201

1,020

674

311

35

243

777

411

407

202

44

976

157

863

147

110

29

*8

35

112

51

57

39

*7

140

20

127

873

564

282

27

208

665

Percent distribution

100.0

70.5

27.4

2.1

12.6

87.4

39.9

39.4

20.7

27.0

73.0

14.2

85.8

100.0

77.2

19.7

3.2

12.8

87.2

45.7

34.8

19.5

37.8

62.2

12.0

88.0

100.0

68.9

29.3

1.6

12.6

87.4

100.0

71.2

27,2

1.6

7.4

92.6

62.7

30.6

6.6

54.5

45.5

13.1

86,9

100.0

76.6

21.0

2.4

8.3

91.7

64.9

28.5

6.5

60.9

39.1

“ 10.9

89.1

100.0

69.1

29.7

1.2

7.1

92.9

100.0

72.1

26.0

1.9

11.7

88.3

25.3

44.8

29.8

18.6

81.4

14.3

85.7

100,0

79.1

17.8

3.1

14.9

85.1

24.6

41.5

33.9

20.5

79.5

12.4

87.6

100.0

70.8

27.5

1.6

11.1

88.9

..- 100.0

68.5

28.8

2.6

17.3

82.7

27.8

43.7

2B.5

7.3

92.7

15.2

84.8

100.0

76.7

18.7

4.6

18.5

81.5

26.6

41.2

32.3

8.3

91.7

13.9

86.1

100.0

67.3

30.3

2.4

17.1

82.9

100.0

66.1

30.5

3.4

23.8

76.2

40.3

39.9

19.8

4.3

95.7

15.4

84.6

100.0

74.7

19.6

*5.7

23.6

76.4

34.8

38.8

28.4

*4.9

95.1

13.8

86.2

100.0

64.6

32.3

3.0

23.9

76.1

Sae note at end of teble.

6
Table 1. Number and percent distribution of family planning visits for females by selected characteristics, according to age: United States, 1980—Con.

Selected characteristics

Age Age

All All

agas Under 20-24 25-29 30yeafs ages Undar 20-24 25-29 30yeats

20 yeara yaars yaara and ovar 20 years yaars yaars and over

Education

Lessthan 12 years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

12yeers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

13vears or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Student status

Student . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Note student . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Public assistance income

Family receives public assistance income . . . .

Family does not receive public assistance income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number in thousanda Percent distribution

2,879 1,360 754 405 360

3,028 693 1,348 “ 638 350

1,575 146 860 405 164

1,825 1,141 542 104 37

5,657 1,057 2.419 1,344 836

1,100 308 432 224 137

6,381 1,891 2,530 1,224 736

38.5 61.9 25.5 28.0 41.2

40.5 31.5 45.5 44.1 40.1

21.0 6.6 29.0 27.9 18.7

24.4 51.9 18.3 7.2 4.2

75.6 48.1 81.7 92.8 95.8

14.7 14.0 14.6 15.4 15.7

85.3 86.0 85.4 84.6 64.3

NOTE Numbers maynotadd tototals dua to rounding.

7

.

●
Table2. Number andpercent distribution of family planning visits for females byselected characteristics, according to age: United States, 1980

Age Age

Selected characteristics

All All

eges Under 20-24 25-29 30years ages Under 20-24 25-29 30 years

20 yeara years years and over 20 yeara years years and over

All viaits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number of pregnancies

Never pregnant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

One pregnancy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Twopregnancies or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number of live births

Nolive birtha . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

One live birth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Twolive births or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Prior contraceptive method

Pill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

IUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diaphragm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

,Foam, jelly, or cream . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Natural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Sterilization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Othar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Never used method regularly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Source of prior methodl

Same sarvice site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other senrice site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Hospital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Private physician . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Drugstore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Unknown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Initial visits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number of pregnancies

Never pregnant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

One pregnancy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Twopregnancies or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number of live birtha

Nolive birtha . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

One live birth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Twolive births or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Prior contraceptive method

Pill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

IUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diaphragm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Foam, jelly, or cream . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Natural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Sterilization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Never used method regularly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Source of prior methodl

Same sewice site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other service site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Hospital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Private physician. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Drugstore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Unknown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number in thousands Percent distribution

9.261

3,999

2,453

2,810

5,018

2,100

2,143

5,939

638

398

347

50

81

148

1,659

4,919

855

217

1,211

171

146

84

1,779

991

402

387

1,153

337

289

561

52

43

77

17

7

51

971

562

98

78

51

3,082

2,061

767

235

2,429

542

111

1.884

65

52

99

14

*4

53

903

1.488

216

46

296

63

43

26

864

673

167

43

743

121

20

167

*6

●5

32

*7

●z

27

621

172

45

28

18

3,491

1,443

1,107

942

1,903

966

622

2,461

207

173

114

16

t’4

43

464

1,957

375

79

480

56

47

32

529

241

158

130

305

136

88

221

17

18

24

*5

“1

13

231

226

29

25

18

1,667

380

426

861

534

433

701

1,086

184

109

65

*IO

22

25

166

932

175

48

271

28

32

16

219

57

54

109

77

55

87

101

15

12

12

*3

*2

*5

89

115

13

14

●8

1,020

114

134

772

152

159

709

499

163

65

69

“lo

41

28

126

542

68

43

163

24

23

11

147

21

22

104

28

24

95

52

15

*8

9

*3

●3

*6

51

69

11

10

“7

100.0

43.2

26.5

30.3

54.2

22.7

23.1

64.1

6.9

4.3

3.7

.5

.9

1.6

17.9

53.1

9.2

2.3

13.1

1.8

1.6

.9

100.0

55.7

22.6

21.7

64.8

18.9

16.3

31.5

2.9

2.4

4.3

.9

.4

2.9

54.6

32.7

5.5

4.4

Z.8

100.0

66.9

25.5

7.6

78.8

17.6

3.6

61.4

2.1

1.7

3.2

.4

*.1

1.7

29.3

48.3

7.0

1.6

9.6

2.0

1.4

.8

100.0

76.2

18.9

4.9

84.1

13.7

2.2

21.1

*.6

*.5

3.6

*.8

“.1

3.0

70.2

19.4

5.1

3.2

2.0

100.0

41.3

31.7

27.0

54.5

27.7

17.8

70.5

5.9

5.0

3.3

.5

.4

1.2

13.3

56.1

10.8

2.3

13.8

1.6

1.4

.9

100.0

45.5

29.9

24.6

57.6

25.8

16.6

41.7

3.1

3.4

4.6

*.9

*.3

2.5

43.6

42.7

5.4

4.8

3.5

100.0

22.8

25.5

51.7

32.0

26.0

42.0

65.1

11.0

6.5

3.9

*.6

1.3

1.5

10.0

55.9

10.5

2.9

16.3

1.7

1.9

.9

100.0

25.8

24.5

49.8

35.3

25.2

39.5

46.0

6.9

5.7

5.4

“1.2

“1.0

*2.3

31,5

52.6

5.7

6.5

* 3.7

100,0

11.2

13.1

75.7

14.9

15.6

69.6

48.9

17.9

6.4

6.8

“1.0

4.0

2.7

12.3

53.2

8.7

4.2

16.0

2.3

2.2

1.1

100.0

14.1

15.2

70.7

19.2

16.3

64.5

35.7

10.1

●5.4

6.4

“1.7

* 2.2

‘4.1

34.4

46.8

7,4

6.9

*4.5

See footnote and note at end of table.

8

.

●
Table2. Number andpercent distribution of family planning viait8for females byselected chamctaristica, according toage:Unitad Statea, 1980-Con.

Selected characteristics

Age Age

All All

ages Under 20-24 25-29 30 years ages Under 20-24 25-29 30 yeers

20 years years years end over 20 years yeara years and ovar

Number in thousands Pement distribution

Return visits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number of pregnancies

Never pregnant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Onepregnsncy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . .

Twopregnsnciea ormore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number of live births

No live births . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

One live birth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Two live births or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Prior contraceptive method

Pill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

IUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diaphragm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Foam, jelly, orcream . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Natural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Sterilization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Never used method regularly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Source of prior method’

Same service site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other sewice site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Hospital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Private physician . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Drugstore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Othar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Unknown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7,481

3,007

2,051

2.423

3,864

1,764

1,853

5,376

586

355

270

33

74

97

687

4,919

855

217

629

73

68

33

2,198

1,388

619

191

1,686

421

91

1,707

59

47

67

“7

“3

26

282

1,488

216

48

124

18

15

“7

2,962

1,202

948

811

1,598

829

534

2,240

190

155

90

12

13

29

233

1,957

375

79

254

27

22

13

1,448

324

372

752

456

378

614

985

169

96

53

“7

20

20

97

932

175

46

156

15

18

*8

873

93

111

668

124

135

614

446

168

57

60

●7

38

22

75

542

88

43

95

13

13

*4

100.0

40.2

27.4

32.4

51.7

23.6

24.8

71.9

7.6

4.7

3.6

.4

1.0

1.3

9.2

65.7

11.4

2.9

8.4

1.0

.9

.4

100.0

63.1

28.2

8.7

76.7

19.2

4.1

77.6

2.7

2.1

3.1

*.3

*.1

1.2

12.8

67.7

9.8

2.2

5.6

.6

.7

● .3

100.0

40.6

32.0

27.4

54.0

28.0

18.0

75.6

6.4

5.2

3.0

.4

.4

1.0

7.9

66.1

12.7

2.7

8.6

.9

.8

.5

I 00.0

22.4

25.7

51.9

31.5

26.1

42.4

6S.0

11.7

6.7

3.7

*.5

1.4

1.4

6.7

64.3

12.1

3.3

10.8

1.0

1.3

*.5

100.0

10.7

12.8

76.5

14.2

15.5

70.3

51.1

19.2

6.5

6.9

*.9

4.4

2.5

8.6

62.1

10.1

4.9

10.8

1.5

1.5

*.5

1~x.lude5 vi5iw with no prior contraceptive method.

NOTE Numbers may not add to totala due to rounding.

9
Table 3, Number and percent distribution of family planning visits for females by selected chsracteriatics, according to age: United States, 1980

Salected characteristics

Age Age

All All

ages Under 20-24 25-29 30 years ages Under 20-24 25-29 30 years

20 years years years and over 20 yeara years years and over

All visits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Contraceptive method adopted or continued

Pill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...<.... . . . . . . . . .

IUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diaphragm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Foam, jelly, or cream.,.....,.. . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

None . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Reason for no method

Pregnant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Relying on partner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Medical services provided

Pap amear . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Pelvic examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Breast examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Blood preasure check . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Pregnancy test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Venereal diaeaae test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Urinalysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Blood iest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other medical servicea’ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Initial visits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Contraceptive method adopted or continued

Pill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

IUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diaphragm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Foam, jelly, orcrea m. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

None . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Reason for no method

Pregnant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Relying on partner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .:

Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Medical services prtrvidad

Pap smear . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Pelvic examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Breast examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .

Blood preaaure check . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Pregnancy test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Venereal disease test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Urinalysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Blood teat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other medical cervices’ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Return visits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Contraceptive method adopted or continuad

Pill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

IUD, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diaphragm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Foam, jelly, or cream . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

None . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Reason for no method

Pregnant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Relying on partner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number in thousands Percent distribution

9,261

6,254

663

605

461

222

1,055

327

385

343

4,186

5,430

4,420

8,017

817

3.777

4,404

3,684

5,606

1,779

1,074

73

133

121

47

331

118

115

99

1,183

1,364

1,231

1,584

227

1,024

1,199

1,096

1,075

7,481

5,181

590

471

340

175

724

209

270

245

3,082

2,365

83

114

137

36

347

129

108

111

1,379

1,719

1,452

2,681

307

1,255

1,486

1,248

1,873

884

614

12

39

54

14

151

61

45

45

625

685

646

802

111

541

637

583

542

2,198

1,751

71

76

83

22

196

68

62

66

3,491

2,441

226

257

149

57

361

121

124

117

1,537

2,039

1,632

3,012

311

1,402

1,632

1,357

2,105

529

308

27

62

34

12

96

35

34

27

332

399

348

465

69

288

334

305

316

2,962

2,133

199

205

115

45

265

85

90

90

. --- . --- 1,Ub f

1,019

176

146

87

53

187

50

73

63

754

1,009

799

1,439

132

677

777

651

1,008

218

107

17

27

17

9

42

13

16

13

134

165

140

190

28

117

134

124

128

1,448

911

159

119

70

44

145

38

57

51

1,(JLU

430

179

88

B9

75

160

28

80

52

515

663

537

885

67

443

429

620

147

45

17

16

16

12

42

*9

19

14

93

114

98

126

18

79

94

84

90

873

385

161

72

73

63

118

19

61

39

100.0

67.5

7.2

6.5

5.0

2.4

11.4

3.5

4.2

3.7

45.2

58.6

47.7

86.6

8.8

40.8

47.6

39.8

60<6

100.0

60.3

4.1

~ 7.5

6.8

2.6

18.6

6.6

6.4

5.5

66.5

76.6

69.2

89.0

12.8

57.5

67.4

61.6

60.4

100.0

69.2

7.9

6.3

4.5

2.3

9.7

2.8

3.6

3.3

I 00.0 “

76.7

2,7

3.7

4.4

1.2

1.3

4.2

3.5

3.6

44.8

55.8

47.1

87.0

10.0

40.7

48.2

40.5

60.8

100.0

69.4

1.4

4.4

6.1

1.6

17.1

6.9

5.1

5.1

70.7

77.5

73.1

90.8

12.5

61.2

72.1

66.0

61.4

100.0

79.7

3.2

3.4

3.8

1.0

8.9

3.1

2.8

3.0

100.0

69.9

6.5

7.4

4.3

1.6

10.3

3.5

3.5

3.4

44.0

58.4

46.7

86,3

8.9

40.2

46.7

38.9

60.3

100.0

58.2

5.0

9.8

6.5

2.3

18.2

6.6

6.4

5.1

62.6

75.4

65.6

87.9

13.1

54.3

63.2

57.6

59.7

100.0

72.0

6.7

6.9

3.9

1.5

8.9

2.9

3.0

3.0

100.0

61.1

0.5

8.7

5.2

3.2

1.2

3.0

4.4

3.8

45.2

100.0

42.1

17<5

8.6

8.7

7.4

15.7

2.7

7.8

5.1

50.5

60.5 65.0

47.9 52.6

86.3 86.7

7.9 6.5

40;6 43.4

46.6 49.9

39<1 42.0

60.4 60.8

100.0 100.0

48.9 30.4

7.8 11.6

12.3 10.7

7.8 10.8

4.1 8.1

19.1 28.4

5.9 *6.1

7.5 12.9

5.8 9.4

60.9 63.4

75.4 77.4

63.9 66.5

86.5 86.0

12.9 12.5

53.2 53.5

61.0 63.6

56.5 57.3

57.7 60.9

100.0 100.0

62.9 44.1

11.0 18.5

8.2 8.3

4.8 8.3

3.1 7.2

10.0 13.5

2.6 2.1

3.9 7.0

3.5 4.4

See footnote and note at end of tabla.

10
Table 3. Number and percent distribution of fsmily planning visits for femsles by selected characteristic, according to age: United States, 1980—Con.

Age Age

Selected characteristics

All All

ages Under 20-24 25-29 30 yeers ages Under 20-24 25-29 30 years

20 years years years and over 20 yeers years years and over

Number in thousanda Percent distribution

Medical services provided

Papsmear . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,003 755 1,206 620 422 40.1 34.3 40.7 42.8 48.3

Pelvic examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,066 1,034 1,640 843 549 54.3 47.0 55.4 58.2 62.9

8raaat examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,189 806 1,284 659 439 42.6 36.7 43.4 45.5 50.3

8100d pressure check . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,433 1,879 2,547 1,249 75a 86.0 85.5 86.0 86.3 86.8

Pregnancy test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 590 197 241 104 48 7.9 8.9 8.2 7.2 5.5

Venareal disease teat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,754 714 1,115 561 364 36.8 32.5 37.6 38.7 41.7

Urinalysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...<.. . . . . . . . . . . 3,205 849 1,297 643 416 42.8 38.6 43.8 44.4 47.6

8100d test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,588 664 1,052 528 344 34.6 30.2

Other medical services’ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

35.5 36.4 39.4

4,531 “ 1,330 1,789 881 531 60.6 60.4 60.4 60.8 60.7

1Includw sterilization and infertility treatment.

NOTE: Numbere may not add to totala due to rounding and because more than one medical sarvice was prwided per viait.

11
Table 4. Number and percent distribution of family planning visits for females by selected characteristic, according to race and Hispanic origin:

United States, 1980

Selected characteristics

Race Hispanic origin Race Hispanic origin

All All

r~ces 1

White Black Hispanic

Non- racesl

White Black Hispanic

NonHispanic Hispanic

Number in thousands

All visits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Education

Lesathan 12 years.....,.....,., . . . . . . . . . . .

12 years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

13years or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Student status

Student . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Not a student . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Public aasiatance income

Family receivas public assistance income . . . . . .

Family does not receive public assistance income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Initial visits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Education

Less than 12 years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

12 yeara . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

13years or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Student statua

Student . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Not a student . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Public assistance income

Family receives public aaaistance income, .,...

Family does not receive public aasiatance income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Return visits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Education

Less than 12 years...........,.. . . . . . . . . . . .

12 years. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

13yeara or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Student status

Student . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Not a student . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Public assistance income

Family receives pubiicessistanca income . . . . . .

Family does not receive public assistance income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

9,261

3,692

3,647

1,921

2,496

6,764

1,313

7,948

1,779

814

619

347

672

1,108

213

1,567

7,481

2,879

3,028

1,575

1,825

5,657

1,100

6,381

6,529

2,613

2,476

1,440

1,712

4,817

607

5,922

1,373

616

480

277

504

870

116

1,257

5,156

1,997

1,996

1,163

1,209

3,947

491

4,664

2,540

1.007

1.100

’433

737

,803

,860

350

175

119

56

150

200

88

262

2.190

832

982

377

587

1,603

592

1,598

1,168

725

334

108

118

1,050

149

1,019

227

142

64

22

41

186

25

202

940

583

271

86

77

863

123

817

8,093

2,967

3,313

1,813

2,379

5,715

1,164

6,929

1,552

672

555

325

631

921

187

1,365

6,541

2,295

2,758

1,488

1,748

4,794

977

5,564

Percent distribution

100.0

39.9

39.4

20.7

27.0

73.0

14.2

65.8

100.0

45.7

34.8

19.5

37.8

62.2

12.0

88.0

100.0

36.5

40.5

21.0

24.4

75.6

14.7

85.3

100.0

40.0

37.9

22.1

26.2

73.8

9,3

90.7

100.0

44.8

35.0

20.2

36.7

63.3

8.4

91.6

100.0

38.7

38.7

22.6

23.4

76.6

9.5

90.5

100.0

39,6

43.3

17.0

29.0

71.0

26.8

73.2

100.0

50.1

33.9

16.0

42.8

57.2

25.2

74,8

100.0

38.0

44.8

17.2

26,8

73.2

27.0

73.0

100.0

62.1

28.6

9.2

10CI

89.9

12.8

87,2

100.0

62.4

28.1

9.5

18.0

82.0

11.2

88.8

100.0

62,0

28.8

9.2

8.2

91.8

13.1

86,9

100.0

36.7

40.9

22.4

29.4

70.6

14.4

85.6

00.0

43.3

35.8

20.9

40.7

59.3

12.1

87.9

100.0

35.1

42.2

22.8

26.7

73.3

14.9

85.1

1Includes visits for races othsr than white and black.

NOTE: Numbers msynotadd tototals due to rounding.

12
Table 5. Number andpercent"dietnbution of family planning visits for females byselected characteristics, according to race and Hispanic origin:

United States. 1980

Race Hispanic origin Race Hispanic origin

Selected characteristics Tots/l

NonTotal’

White Black Hispanic White Black Hispanic

NonHispanic Hispanic

Number in thousands

All viaits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number of pregnancies

Never pragnant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Onepragnancy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Twopregnancies or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number of live birtha

No live birtha . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Ona live birth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Twolive birtha or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Prior contraceptive method

pill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

IUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diaphragm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Foam, jelly, orcream . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Natural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Sterilization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Never used method regularly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Source of prior niethod2

Same service site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other service aite . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Hospital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Private physician . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Drugstore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Unknown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Initial visits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number of pregnancies

Never pregnant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Onepragnancy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Twopregnancies or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number of live births

No live births . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

One live birth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Two live births or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Prior contraceptive method

Pill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

IUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diaphragm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Foam, jeliy, or cream . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Natural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Sterilization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Never used method regularly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Source of prior method2

Same service site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other service site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Hospital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Private physician . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Drugstore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Unknown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

9,261

3,999

2,453

2,810

5,018

2,100

2,143

5,939

636

396

347

50

81

148

1,659

4,919

855

217

1,211

171

146

84

1,779

991

402

387

1,153

337

289

561

52

43

77

17

7

51

971

582

98

78

51

6,529

3,005

1,681

1,843

3,792

1,337

1.400

4,163

423

316

245

41

50

112

1,180

3,378

587

122

941

141

112

67

1,373

798

293

282

928

234

211

440

40

37

65

14

●6

43

728

458

83

62

42

2,540

902

732

806

1,115

731

694

1,667

197

74

95

●7

29

32

439

1,451

253

90

237

24

29

16

350

163

98

89

189

95

66

101

●lo

●5

●9

●2

●1

“6

216

102

“12

12

●8

1,166

200

313

654

269

337

562

688

147

24

47

“6

13

19

223

605

107

44

146

16

19

●9

227

75

60

93

88

60

79

68

*9

“3

“7

●2

*1

*5

132

8,093

3,798

2,140

2,155

4,749

1,764

1,580

5,251

491

374

300

44

69

129

1,436

4,314

748

172

1,065

155

127

76

1,552

917

342

294

1,066

276

210

493

43

41

70

15

6

47

839

Percent distribution

100.0

43.2

26.5

30.3

54.2

22.7

23.1

64.1

6.9

4.3

3.7

.5

.9

1.6

17.9

53.1

9.2

2.3

13.1

1.8

1.6

.9

100.0

55.7

22.6

21.7

64.8

18.9

16.3

31.5

2.9

2.4

4.3

.9

.4

2.9

54.6

100.0

46.0

25.8

28.2

58.1

20.5

21.4

63.8

6.5

4.8

3.7

.6

.8

1.7

18.1

51.7

9.0

1.9

14.4

2.2

1.7

1.0

100.0

58.1

21.3

20.6

67.6

17.0

15.4

32.1

2.9

2.7

4.6

1.0

● .4

3.2

53.0

100.0

35.5

28.8

35.7

43.9

28.8

27.3

65.6

7.8

2.9

3.7

*.3

1.1

1.3

17.3

57.1

9.9

3.6

9.4

1.0

1.2

.6

100.0

46.5

27.9

25.6

54.1

27.0

18.8

28.9

*2.8

*1.4

* 2.7

“.5

*.4

*1.7

61.6

100.0

17.2

26.8

56.0

23.0

28.8

48.2

59.0

12.6

2.0

4.1

*.5

1.1

1.7

19.1

51.8

9.2

3.8

12.5

1.3

1.6

*.7

100.0

32.8

26.3

40.9

38.7

26.6

34.7

30.0

*4.1

*1.1

“3.0

81.0

*.4

“2.0

58.3

I 00.0

46.9

26.4

26.6

58.7

21.8

19.5

64.9

6.1

4.6

3.7

.5

.8

1.6

17.7

53.3

9.2

2.1

13.2

1.9

1.6

.9

100.0

59.0

22.0

18.9

68.6

17.8

13.6

31.7

2.8

2.6

4.5

.9

.4

3.0

54.0

66 514 32.7 33.3 29.2 30.0 33.1

*8 89 5.5 6.0 “3.3 “ 3.6 5.8

12 65 4.4 4.6 3.5 5.4 4.2

*6 45 2.9 3.0 ●2.3 * 2.7 2.9

See footnotes and note at end of table,

13
Table 5. Number and percent distribution of family planning visits for femalea by selected characteristics, sccording to race and Hispanic origin:

United States, 1980—Con.

R3ce Hispanic origin Rote Hispenic origin

Selected characteristics Tote/l

iVonToteit

White Black Hispanic White Black Hispanic ffonHisnanic Hisnanic

Return visits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number of pregnancies

Never pregnant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

One pregnancy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Twopregnanciea or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number of live births

No live births . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

One live birth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Two live births or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Prior contraceptive method

Pill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

IUD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diaphragm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Foam, jelly, or cream . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Natural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Sterilization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Never used method regularly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Source of prior methodz

Same service site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other service site............,.. . . . . . . . . . . .

Hospital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Private physician. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Drugstore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Othar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Unknown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number in thousands

7,481

3,007

2,051

2,423

3,864

1,764

1,853

5,378

586

355

270

33

74

97

687

4,919

855

217

629

73

68

33

5,156

2,207

1,388

1,561

2,863

1,104

1,189

3,722

383

279

179

27

45

69

452

3,378

587

122

463

59

50

25

2,190

739

634

816

928

636

628

1,566

187

69

85

*6

28

26

223

1,451

253

90

135

“13

17

“8

940

126

253

561

181

276

483

620

138

21

40

*4

*12

*15

90

605

107

44

77

*7

“7

*3

6,541

2,882

1,786

1,862

3,684

1,488

1,370

4,758

448

334

230

30

62

62

597

4,314

748

172

551

66

61

31

Percent distribution

100.0

40.2

27.4

32.4

51.7

23.6

24.8

71.9

7.8

4.7

3.6

.4

1.0

1.3

9.2

65.7

11.4

2.9

8.4

1.0

.9

.4

I 00.0

42.8

26.9

30.3

55.5

21.4

23.1

72.2

7.4

5.4

3.5

.5

.9

1.3

8.8

65.5

11.4

2.4

%4

1.1

1.0

.5

100.0

33.8

29.0

37.3

42.3

29.0

28.7

71.5

8.5

3.1

3.9

*.3

1.3

1.2

10.2

66.3

11.5

4.1

6.2

*.6

.8

● .3

100.0

13.4

26.9

59.7

19.2

29.4

51.4

66.0

14.7

2.2

4.3

*.4

*1.3

*1.6

9.6

64.3

11.4

4.7

8.2

*.8

*.7

● .3

100.0

44.1

27.5

28.5

56.3

22.7

20.9

72.7

6.8

5.1

3.5

.5

1.0

1.3

9.1

66.0

11.4

2.6

8.4

1.0

.9

.5

1in~l”de~ “i~it~ for races othar than white and black.

2Exclude~ visits with no prior contraceptive method.

NOTE: Numbere may not add to totala due to rowrding.
Table 6. Number and percent distribution of family planning visits for femeles by selected characteristics, accordin9 to mce and Hispanic ori9in:

Unitad States, 1980

Selected characteristics

Race Hispanic origin Rata Hispanic origin

Totali

Non- Totall

White Black Hispanic White Black Hispanic NonHispanic Hispanic

Number in thousands Percent distribution

All visita . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Contraceptive method adoptad or continuad

Pill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

IUD.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

D!sphregm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Foam, jelly, orcresm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

None . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Reason for no method

Pregnant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Relying onpartnar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Medical sewicea provided

Pap smear . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Pelvic examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Breaet examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Blood preasure chalk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Pregnancy taat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Venereal disaase test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Urinalysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Blood iest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Othermedicsl sewicas2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Initial visits..................,,. . . . . . . . . . .

Contraceptive method edopted or continued

pil l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

IUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diaphragm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Foam, jelly, or cream . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

None . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Reason for no method

Pregnant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Relying on partner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Othar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Medical services provided

Pap smear . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Pelvic examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Breast examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Blood pressure chack . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Pregnancy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Venereal disease test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Urinalysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Blood iest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Othermedical aervices2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Return visits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Contraceptive method sdopted or continued

Pill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

IUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diaphragm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Foam, jelly, or cream . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

None . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Reason for no method

Pregnant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Relying onpattrrar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

9,261

6,254

683

605

461

222

1,055

327

365

343

4,186

5,430

4,420

8,017

817

3,777

4,404

3,684

5,606

1,779

1,074

73

133

121

47

331

118

115

99

1,183

1,364

1,231

1,584

227

1,024

1,199

1,096

1,075

7,481

5,181

590

471

340

175

724

209

270

245

6,529

4,415

436

483

279

148

766

251

281

236

2,960

3,792

3,105

5,574

619

2,588

3,205

2,659

3,986

1,373

828

53

112

81

35

264

97

91

75

918

1,049

950

1,223

186

777

939

860

824

5,156

3,587

382

371

197

113

505

154

190

161

2,540

1,733

198

112

173

62

261

69

93

100

1,142

1,529

1,239

2,295

178

1,117

1,119

955

1,516

350

218

13

16

36

*7

57

17

19

21

235

278

253

318

33

220

229

209

218

2,180

1,515

185

94

137

55

204

51

74

79

1,168

696

156

36

65

30

185

42

96

47

520

712

580

1,033

102

414

538

423

734

227

118

18

●9

16

“6

60

12

34

14

150

1B7

166

208

23

112

146

132

152

940

578

137

27

48

24

125

29

63

33

8,093

5,558

507

569

396

192

870

286

2B8

296

3,666

4,718

3,840

6,984

715

3,363

3,866

3,262

4,872

1,552

956

55

125

105

41

271

106

81

84

1,033

1,177

1,065

1,375

204

912

1,053

965

922

6,541

4,603

453

444

292

151

599

180

207

212

100.0

67.5

7.2

6.5

5.0

2,4

11.4

3.5

4.2

3.7

45.2

58.6

47.7

86,6

8.8

40.8

47.6

39.8

60.6

100.0

60.3

4.1

7.5

6.8

2.6

18.6

6.6

6.4

5.5

66.5

76.6

69.2

89.0

12.6

57.5

67.4

61.6

60.4

100.0

69.2

7.9

6.3

4.5

2.3

9.7

2.8

3.6

3.3

100.0

67.6

6.7

7.4

4.3

2,3

11.6

3.8

4.3

3.6

45.3

58.1

47.6

85.4

8.5

39.6

49.1

40.7

61.0

100.0

60.3

3.9

6.2

5.9

2.5

19.2

7.1

6.7

5.4

66.9

76.4

69.2

89.1

13.6

56.5

68.4

62.6

60.1

100.0

69.6

7.4

7.2

3.8

2.2

9.8

3.0

3.7

3.1

100,0

68.2

7.6

4.4

6.8

2.5

10.3

2.7

3.7

3.9

44.9

60.2

. 48.B

90.3

7.0

44.0

44.1

37.6

59.6

100.0

62.3

3.8

5.2

10.3

*2.1

16.4

4.9

5.5

6.0

67.1

79.4

72.3

90.8

9.6

62.9

65.6

59.8

62.4

100.0

69.2

8.4

4.3

6.3

2.5

9.3

2.3

3.4

3.6

100.0

59.6

13.4

3.1

5.6

2.6

15.9

3.6

6.2

4.0

44.5

61.0

49.7

88.5

8.7

35.4

46.1

36.2

62.8

100.0

51.9

8.1

* 3.8

7.2

*2.5

26.5

5.4

14.8

6.3

66.1

82.2

73.2

91.8

10.1

49.1

64.1

56.0

67.3

100.0

61.5

14.6

2.9

5.2

2.6

13.3

3.1

6.7

3.5

100.0

68.7

6.3

7.0

4.9

2.4

10.8

3.5

3.6

3.7

45,3

58.3

47.4

86.3

8.6

41.6

47.6

40.3

60.3

100.0

61.6

3.5

8.0

6.7

2.7

17.5

6.8

5.2

5.4

66.5

75.8

68.6

68.6

13.2

58.8

67.8

62.1

59.4

100.0

70.4

6.9

6.B

4.5

2.3

9.2

2.7

3.2

3.2

See footnotes and note at end of table.

15
Table6. Number andpement distribution of family planning visits for females byselected charactaristicst according tOmcaand HisPanic Ori9in:

United States, 1980—Con.

Race Hispanic origin Race Hispanic origin

Selected characteristics Tots/l

NonTotall

White Black Hispenic Whita Black Hispanic NonHispanic Hispanic

Number in thousands Percent distribution

Medical services provided

Papsmeer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,003 2,041 907 370 2,633 40.1 39.6 41.4 39.3 40.3

Pelvic examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,066 2,743 1,251 525 3,541 54.3 53.2 57.1 55.6 54.1

Bresat examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,169 2,155 966 414 2,775 42.6 41.8 45.0 44.0 42.4

Blood preasura check . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,433 4,351 1,977 824 5,609 86.0 84.4 90.3 B7.7 85.7

Pregnancy test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. I . . . . . . . . 590 433 145 79 511 7.9 8.4 6.6 8.4 7.8

Venereel disease test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,754 1,812 897 302 2,451 36.8 35.1 47.0 32.1 37.5

Urinslyaia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,205 2,265 890 392 2,B13 42.8 43.9 40.6 41.7 43.0

Blood teat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,566 1,799 746 291 2,297 34.6 34.9 34.0 30.9 35.1

Otharmedicsl eervices2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,531 3,160 1,299 580 3,949 60.6 61.3 59.4 61.7 60.4

1,ncludea “i~it~ for races other than white and black.

zl”c,ude~ sterilization and infertility treatment.

NOTE: Numbemmay notaddto totals duetorounding and because more than onemedical sewicewas provided perviait.

16
Table7. Number of family planning viaiwforfemales byseiected characteristics, eccodingto contraceptive method adopted orcontinued: United States,l98O

Selected Ch8iWCti9riSt!CS

Contraceptive method adopted or continued

Total

Pill IUD Diephragm

Foem, jelly, Other None

or craem

All viaits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number of pregnancies

Never pregnant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

One pregnancy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Twopregnancies or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number of live births

No live birtha . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

One live birth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Two live birtha or more ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Prior contraceptive method

pill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..<...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

IUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diaphragm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Foam, jelly, orcream . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Otherl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Never used method regularly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Initial visits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number of pregnancies

Never pregnant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

One pregnancy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Twopregnancies ormora . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number of live birtha

No live births . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

One live birth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Twolive births or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Prior contraceptive method

Pill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

IUD.., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diaphragm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Foam, jelly, orcream . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Otherl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Never used method regularly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Return visits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number of pregnancies

Never pregnant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

One pregnancy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Twopragnancies ormora . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number of live births

Nolive birtha . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

One live birth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Twolive birtha ormore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Prior contraceptive method

Pill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

IUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diaphragm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Foam, jelly, or cream . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Never used method regularly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..”...... . . . . .

9,261

3,999

2,453

2,810

5,018

2,100

2,143

5,939

636

398

347

279

1,659

1,779

891

402

387

1,153

337

289

561

52

43

77

75

971

7,461

3,007

2,051

2,423

3,864

1,764

1,853

5,378

586

355

270

207

687

6,254

2,959

1,700

1,596

3,652

1,410

1,193

4,942

92

70

119

88

942

1,074

652

241

180

750

195

129

394

13

12

36

36

583

5,181

2,306

1,459

1,416

2,902

1,215

1,064

4,548

79

56

83

54

359

663

130

175

358

185

187

291

146

405

15

24

12

62

73

16

21

35

24

21

26

23

21

*2

*3

●1

22

590

114

154

323

162

165

263

123

384

13

21

11

40

Number in thousands

605

267

147

170

392

106

106

188

27

251

25

19

94

133

73

29

31

92

21

20

33

●5

19

*8

●8

60

471

214

116

139

300

85

86

154

23

233

17

*11

34

461

139

121

201

177

122

163

175

35

‘lo

119

19

102

121

49

33

39

58

31

31

26

●4

●1

15

*5

69

340

90

88

162

118

80

132

149

31

*9

104

14

33

222

57

38

126

69

38

115

64

12

*5

12

64

45

47

20

8

19

22

6

17

11

*1

*1

*3

9

21

175

37

30

107

47

30

98

53

10

“4

*9

74

24

I ,055

425

272

359

542

238

274

424

67

46

48

56

414

331

180

69

82

208

60

64

73

*8

●8

11

15

216

724

245

202

277

335

179

211

351

59

38

37

41

198

1,ncl”des natural methods and sterilization.

,NOTE Numbers may not add to totals due to rounding.

17
Table 8. Percent distribution of family planning viaits for females by selected characteristics, according to contraceptive mathod adopted or continuad:

United States, 1980

Contraceptive method adopted or continued ,

Selected characteristics Tote/

Pill IUD Diaphragm Foem, jelly, Other None

or cream

All visits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number of pregnancies

Naver pregnant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Onepregnancy c. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Twopregnanciea or more, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number of live birtha

No live births.,..........,...,.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

One live birth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Twolive birtha or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Prior contraceptive method

Pill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

IUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diaphragm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Foam, jelly, or cream . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other’ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Never uaed method regularly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Initial visits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number of pregnancies

Nevar pregnant.,...,,,,,,,...,., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

One pregnancy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Twopregnanciea or more......,.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Numberof live births

No live births. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

One live birth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , .,.,.,.,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Two live births or mora . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Prior contraceptive method

Pill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

IUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diaphragm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Foam, jelly, or cream . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Othar’ ., ...,.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Never uaeda method regularly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Return visits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., .,.,

Number of pregnancies

Never pregnant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Onepregnancy, . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..d. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Twopregnancias or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number of live births

No live births . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Oneliva birth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Twolive births or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Prior contraceptive method

Pill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

IUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diaphragm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Foam, jelly, orcrea m., ., ...,..., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Otherl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Never uaed method regularly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

100.0

43.2

26.5

30.3

54,2

22,7

23.1

64.1

6.9

4,3

3,7

3,0

17.9

100.0

55.7

22.6

21.7

64.8

18.9

16.3

31.5

2.9

2.4

4.3

4.2

54.6

100.0

40.2

27.4

32.4

51.7

23.6

24.8

71.9

7.6

4.7

3.6

1.7

9.2

100.0

47.3

27.2

25.5

56.4

22.5

19.1

79.0

1.5

1.1

1.9

1.4

15.1

100.0

60.8

22.5

16.8

69.8

18.2

12.0

36.7

1.2

1.1

3.4

3.3

54.3

100.0

44.5

28.2

27.3

56.0

23.4

20.5

87.8

1.5

1.1

1.6

1.0

6.9

100.0

19.6

26.4

54.0

28.0

28.1

43.9

21.9

61.0

2.3

3.6

1.9

9.3

100.0

22.4

29,3

48.3

32.3

28.9

38.9

31.3

28.3

*3.2

*4,2

*2.4

30.5

100.0

19.3

26.0

54.7

27.4

28.0

44.5

20.8

65.0

2.2

3,5

1.8

6.7

Percent distribution

100,0

47.5

24.3

26.1

64.9

17.5

17.6

31.0

4.5

41.6

4.2

3.1

15.5

100.0

54.8

21.8

23.4

69.2

15.8

15,0

25.0

*3.5

14,0

* 6.3

“6.1

45.1

100.0

45.5

25,0

29.5

63,7

18.0

18.3

32.7

4.8

49.4

3.6

* 2.3

7.2

100,0

30.2

26.2

43.6

38.3

26.4

35.4

38.0

7.5

2.2

25.8

4.3

22,1

100.0

40,7

26.9

32.4

48.2

25.9

25.9

21.6

*3.5

*1.1

12.5

*4.5

56.9

100.0

26,5

25.9

47.6

34.8

26,5

38.7

43.9

9.0

*2,6

30.5

4,2

9.7

100,0

25.8

17.3

56.9

31.!

17.2

51.7

29.C)

5.4

*2.3

5.1!

37.9

20.2,

100.01

42.3

16.8

40.9

46.3

17.3

36.3

24.2

‘3.0

*1.3

* 6.2

20,9

44.6

100,0

21.4

17.4

61.2

27.0

17.1

55.9

30.3

6.0

*2.5

* 5.0

42.5

13.7

100.0

40.3

25.7

34.0

51.4

22.6

26.0

40.2

6.4

4.3

4.6

5.4

39.2

100.0

54.4

21.0

24.6

62.7

16.1

19.2

22.0

*2.5

“2.4

3.4

4.5

65.2

100.0

33.8

27.9

38.3

46.2

24.7

29.1

48.5

8.1

5.2

5.1

5.6

27.3

llncl”.je~ natural methods and sterilization.

NOTE: Numbera maynotadd tototals due to rounding.

18
b

Table9. Number of family plenning viaitsforfemales byvisit statua, metical aewices provided, andcontmceptive method adopted orcontinued:

United States, 1980

k7sit status 8nd medicel services provided

Contraceptive method adopted or continued

Total

Pill IUD Diaphragm Foam, jelly.

Other None

or creem

All visits . ...0..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Medical aervicea provided

Papamear . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Pekric examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Breast examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Blood presaure check . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Pregnancy test. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Venereal diaeaae teat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Urinalysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Blood teet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other medical servicesl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Initial visite . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Medical services provided

Pap smear . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Pelvic examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Breast examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Blood preaaure check . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .

Pregnancy test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Venereai diaeaae teat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Urinalysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Blood teet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other medical serviceal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Return visits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Medical services provided

Pap smear . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Pelvic examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

8reast examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Blood pressure chack . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Pregnancy test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Venereal diseasa test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Urinaiysia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Blood test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other medical aervicea’ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

9,261

4,186

5,430

4,420

8,017

817

3,777

4,404

3,684

5,606

1,779

1,183

1,364

1,231

1,584

227

1,024

1,199

1,096

1,075

7,481

3,003

4,066

3,189

6,433

590

2,754

3,205

2,588

4,531

6,254

2,784

3,305

2,889

5,743

227

2,418

2,862

2,410

3,804

1,074

776

648

795

1,026

43

642

756

705

6B3

5,1 El

2,008

2,456

2,096

4,717

184

1,776

2,106

1,705

3,222

663

297

557

331

524

2B

285

267

401

73

36

66

42

62

*3

34

36

38

43

590

259

491

289

462

25

251

258

229

Number in thousands

605 461

345 226

502 301

364 240

469 380

49 69

311 220

353 231

306 207

332 274

133 121

105 74

125 87

106 7B

122 .103

10 16

91 72

100 76

88 75

71 73

471 340

240 152

377 214

258 161

346 277

40 53

220 147

253 155

209 133

260 201

222

125

154

126

172

23

114

128

110

152

47

29

33

30

36

6

26

32

29

33

175

95

120

97

136

17

88

96

81

118

1,055

409

611

469

729

421

430

536

383

543

331

162

204

180

234

149

159

198

152

170

724

248

407

289

494

272

271

33B

231

372

1ln~lud*~ stsfifization and infartiliW Wtment.

NOTE Numbers will not wA+to totals because mom than one medical service wae provided per visit.

19
Table 10. Percent distribution of family planning visits for femalea by visit status and medical services provided, according to contraceptive method

adopted or continued: United Statea, 1980

Contraceptive method adopted or continued

Wit status and medical servicas provided Total

Pill IUD Diephregm Foem, jelly, Other None

or cream

Percent distribution

All visits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Medical senfices provided

Pap smear . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Pelvic examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Breast examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

8100dpreaaure check . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Pregnancy test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Venareal disease test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Urinalysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Blood teat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other medical servicesl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Initial viaita . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Medical services provided

Pap smear . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Pelvic examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Breast examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Blood preasure check . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Pregnancy test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Venereal disease test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Urinalysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

8100d test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other medical serviceal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Return visits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Medical services provided

Pap smear..................,., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Pelvic examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

8reast examination.....,.....,., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Blood pressure check.........,.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Pregnancy test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Venereal diseaae test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Urinalysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Blood iest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other medical serviceal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

100.0

45.2

58.6

47’.7

86.6

8.8

40.8

47.6

39.8

60.6

100.0

66.5

76.6

69.2

89.0

12.8

57.5

67.4

61.6

60.4

100.0

40.1

54.3

42.6

86.0

7.9

36.8

42.8

34.6

60.6

100.0

44.5

52.8

46.2

91.8

3.6

38.7

45.8

38.5

62.5

100,0

72.3

79,0

74.0

95.6

4.0

.59.B

70.5

65.7

63.5

100,0

3B.8

47.4

40.4

91.0

3,6

34.3

40.6

32.9

62.2

t 00.0

44.7

84.0

49.9

79.0

4.2

43.0

44.2

40.3

60.5

100.0

51.6

90.5

57.7

84.6

“4.2

46.6

49.0

52.1

59.2

100.0

43.9

83.2

48.9

78.3

“4.2

42.5

43.7

38.8

60.7

100.0

57.0

83.1

60.2

77.6

8.2

51.5

58.4

50.7

54.8

100.0

78.6

93.9

79,8

91.2

7.3

68.3

75.1

73.2

53.6

100.0

50.9

80.0

54.7

73.7

8.4

46.8

53.7

44.3

55.2

100.0

49.0

65.3

52.0

82.3

15.0

47.6

50.0

46.0

59.5

100.0

61.0

71.7

64.8

85.2

13.5

59.9

62.6

61.6

60.4

100.0

44.8

63.0

47.5

81.3

15.6

43.3

45.5

38.1

59.2

100.0

56.1

69.2

56.9

77.6

10.3

51.1

57,6

49.8

68.4

100.0

62.2

70.7

63.1

76.8

12.3

54.6

68.5

62.1

71.6

100.0

54.5

68.8

55.3

77.8

9.B

50.2

54.7

46.4

67.!5

100.0

38.8

57.9

44.5

68.0

39.9

40.7

50.8

36.3

51.3

100.0

48.8

61.5

54.4

70.7

45.1

47.9

59.8

45.9

51.5

100.0

34.2

56.2

39.9

68.3

37.5

37.5

46.7

31.8

51.4

1 ln~ludea sterilization and infertility Ueatmant.

NOTE Numbars will not add to totals because more than one medical service waa provided per viait.

20
Table 11. Number and percent distribution of family planning visits for females by selected characteristics, according to education: United States, 1980

Selected characteristics

Education

Total

Less than 13 years

Total

12 years

Less than 12 yaars13 years

12 years or more 12 yews or mora

AII visits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number of pregnancies

Never pregnant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Ona pregnancy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Twopregnancies or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number of live births

Nolive&tha . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

One live birth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Two live births or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Medical senrices provided

Pap smear . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Pelvic examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Sreast examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Sloodpreasure check . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Pregnancy test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Venereal diseaae test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Urinalysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Blood iest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other medical aervicesl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Initial visits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number of pregnancies

Never pregnant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Onepregnsncy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Twopregnanciea ormore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number of live births

Nolivebhths . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

One live birth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Two live births or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Medicel services provided

Pap amear . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Pelvic examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Breast examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Blood pressure check . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Pregnancy test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .’. . . . . . . .

Venereal disease test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Urinalysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Blood iest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other medical sewicesl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Return visits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number of pregnancies

Never pregnant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

One pregnancy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Twopregnancies or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number of live births

NO live births . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

One live birth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Twolive btrths or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Medical services provided

Pap smear . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Pelvic examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Breast examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Blood presaure check . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

See fmmmte and note at end of table.

Number in thousands

9,261

3,999

2,453

2,810

5,018

2,100

2,143

4,1 B8

5,430

4,420

6,017

817

3,777

4,404

3,684

5,606

1,779

991

402

387

1,153

337

289

1,183

1,364

1,231

1,584

227

1,024

1,199

1,096

1,075

7,481

3,007

2,051

2.423

3,864

1,784

1,853

3,003

4,066

3,189

6,433

3,692

1,480

919

1,294

1,749

857

1,087

1,609

2,067

1,706

3,218

343

1,439

1,712

1,408

2,257

814

480

165

170

530

149

136

539

616

567

730

102

466

545

502

507

2,879

, 1,000

754

1,124

1,219

708

951

1,070

1.452

1,139

2,488

3,647

1,451

1,061

1,136

1,862

948

836

1,640

2,119

1.724

3,156

310

1,488

1,719

1.436

2,171

619

304

160

155

366

139

116

408

475

421

547

80

353

414

378

363

3,028

1.147

“900

981

1.496

810

722

1,232

1,644

1,303

2,608

1,921

1,06B

473

380

1,406

295

219

936

1,244

990

1,643

164

849

973

841

1,177

347

208

77

62

258

49

39

236

274

243

307

45

204

239

216

204

1,575

860

397

318

1,148

246

180

701

970

747

1,337

Percent distribution

100.0

43.2

26.5

30.3

54.2

22.7

23.1

45.2

68.6

47.7

86.6

8.8

40.8

47.6

39.8

60.6

100.0

55.7

22.6

21.7

64.8

18.9

16.3

66.5

76.6

69.2

89.0

12.8

57.5

67.4

61.6

60.4

100.0

40.2

27.4

32.4

51.7

23.6

24.8

40.1

54.3

42.6

86.0

100.0

40.1

24.9

35.0

47.4

23.2

29.4

43.6

56.0

46.2

87.1

9.3

39.0

46.4

38.1

61.1

100.0

59.0

20.2

20.8

65.1

18.3

16.7

66.3

75.5

69.7

89.7

12.6

57.2

67.0

61.7

62.4

100.0

34.7

26.2

39.1

42.4

24.6

33.0

37.2

50.4

39.6

86.4

100.0

39.8

29.1

31.2

51.1

26.0

22.9

45.0

58.1

47.3

86.5

8.5

40.B

47.1

39.4

59.6

100.0

49.0

25.9

25.1

59.1

22.4

18.5

65.9

76.7

68.1

88.4

12.9

57.1

66.8

61.1

58.7

100.0

37.9

29.7

32.4

49.4

26.7

23.8

40.7

54.3

43.0

86.1

100.0

55.6

24.6

19.7

73.2

15.4

11.4

48.7

64.7

51.5

85.5

8.5

44.2

50.6

43.8

61.3

100.0

59.9

22.1

17.9

74.4

14.3

11.3

68.0

79.0

70.1

88.4

12.9

59.0

69.0

62.4

58.9

100.0

54.6

25.2

20.1

72.9

15.6

11.4

44.5

61.6

47.4

84.9

21
Table 11. Number and percent distribution of family planning viaita for females by selected characteristics, according to education: United States, 1980—Con.

Education Education

Selected characteristics Total

Less than 13 years

Total

12 years

Less than 12 yeara

13 years

12 yeara or more 12 yeara or more

Number in thousande Percent distribution

Medical sewices provided—Con.

Pregnancy test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 590 241 230 119 7.9 8.4 7.6 7.6

Venereal disease test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,754 974 1,135 645 36.8 33.8 37.5 41.0

Urinalysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,205 1,166 1,305 733 42.8 40.5 43,1 46.6

Blood iest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,588 906 1,058 624 34.6 31.5 34.9 39.6

Other medical senficesl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,531 1,750 1,808 974 60.6 60.8 59.8 61.8

1,nclude~ sterilization and infertility treatment.

NOTE Numbers may not add to totals due to rounding and becausa more thsn one madical sewica was provided per visit.

22
Table 12. Number and percent distribution of family planning viaita for femalaa by selected characteristics, according to education: United States, 1980

Setected characteristics

Education Education

Total

Less then 13 years

Total

12 yaars

Lass than 12 years

13 yaars

12 years or more 12 years or more

Number in thousands

All viaits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Prior contraceptive method

Pill . . ...<.... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

IUD . . ...<.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diaphragm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Fosm, jelly, orcream . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Natural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Sterilization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Never used method regularly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Source of prior methodl

Same service aite . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other service site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Hospital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Private physician . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Drugstore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Unknown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Contraceptive method adopted or continued

Pill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

IUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diaphragm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Foam, jelly, or cream . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other ?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

None . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Initial viaita . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Prior contraceptive method

Pill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

IUD..., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Dtaphregm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Foam, jelly, orcream,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Natural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Sterilization ..,.............,;. . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Never used method regularly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Source of prior methodl

Same service aite . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Othe; service site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Hospital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Private physician . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Drugstore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Unknown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Contraceptive method edopted or continued

Pill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

IUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diaphragm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Foam, jelly, orcream . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

None . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Return visits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Prior contraceptive method

Pill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

IUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diaphragm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

See footnotas and note at end of table.

9,261

5,939

638

398

347

50

81

148

1,659

4,919

855

217

1,211

171

146

84

6,254

663

605

461

222

1,055

1,779

561

52

43

77

17

7

51

971

. . .

. . .

. . .

582

98

78

51

1,074

73

133

121

47

331

7,481

5,378

586

355

3,692

2,224

254

59

144

15

38

64

894

1,894

261

101

399

56

55

32

2,531

266

109

218

95

472

814

196

17

“7

26

●5

‘3

22

538

. . .

. . .

. . .

191

35

29

20

518

29

29

60

19

158

2,879

2,028

238

52

3,647

2,504

250

133

137

18

32

54

519

2,025

340

87

522

68

54

32

2,526

260

211

176

86

389

619

241

22

13

31

*6

*3

17

288

. . .

.-.

-..

247

37

28

20

382

26

41

43

17

111

3,028

2,263

228

120

1,921

1,211

134

206

66

17

11

30

245

1,000

254

29

290

47

36

20

1,198

137

284

67

40

195

347

124

14

24

20

*6

*1

12

145

. . .

. . .

. . .

144

25

21

11

174

18

63

18

10

62

1,575

1,087

121

182

Percent distribution

100.0

64.1

6.9

4.3

3.7

.5

.9

1.6

17.9

53.1

9.2

2.3

13.1

1.8

1.6

.9

67.5

7.2

6.5

5.0

2.4

11.4

100.0

31.5

2.9

2.4

4.3

.9

.4

2.9

54.6

. . .

. . .

. . .

32.7

5.5

4.4

2.9

60.3

4.1

7.5

6.8

2.6

18.6

100.0

71.9

7.8

4.7

---- --- 1Uv.o

60.2

6.9

1.6

3.9

.4

1.0

1.7

24.2

51.3

7.1

2.7

10.8

1.5

1.5

.9

68.5

7.2

3.0

5.9

2.6

12.8

100.0

24.0

2.0

*.8

3.2

*.6

*.4

2.7

66.1

. . .

.-.

-..

23.5

4.4

3.6

2.5

63.7

3.6

3.6

7.4

2.4

19.4

100.0

70.5

8.3

1.8

100.0

68.6

6.8

3.7

3.8

.5

.9

1.5

14.2

55.5

9.3

2.4

14.3

1.9

1.5

.9

69.3

7.1

5.8

4.8

2.3

10.7

100.0

38.9

3.5

2.1

5.0

*.9

*.4

2.8

46.5

. . .

. . .

---

39.9

6.0

4.6

3.2

61.6

4.2

6.6

6.8

2.7

18.0

100.0

74.7

7.5

4.0

100.0

63.1

7.0

10.7

3.4

.9

.5

1.6

12.8

52.1

13.2

1.5

15.1

2.4

1.9

1.0

62.4

7.1

14.8

3.5

2.1

10.1

100.0

35.9

4.0

6.8

5.8

“1.7

*.4

3.4

42.0

. . .

. . .

. . .

41.5

7.2

6.0

3.3

50.2

5.2

18.1

5.3

3.0

18.0

100.0

69.0

7.7

11.6

23
Table 12. Number and percent distribution of family planning visits for females by selected characteristics, according to education: United States, 1980—Con.

Selected characteristics

Education

Total

Less than 13 years

Total

12 years

Less than 73 yeers

12 years or more 72 years

72 years

or more

priOr contraceptive method—con.

Foam, jelly, orcream . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Natural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Sterilization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Never used method regularly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Source of prior methodl

Same service site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other aervice aite . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Hospital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Private physician . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Drugstore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Unknown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Contraceptive method adopted or continued

Pill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

IUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diaphragm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Foam, jelly, or cream ...,.,.,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

None . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number in thousands

270

33

74

97

687

4,919

855

217

629

73

68

33

5,181

590

471

340

175

724

118

●9

35

42

356

1,894

261

101

208

21

26

12

2,013

237

80

158

76

315

106

12

30

37

231

2,025

340

87

275

31

27

13

2.144

234

170

134

68

277

46

11

*9

18

100

1,000

254

29

146

22

15

*8

1,024

119

221

48

30

132

Percent distribution

3.6

.4

1.0

1.3

9.2

65.7

11.4

2.9

6.4

1.0

.9

.4

69.2

7.9

6.3

4.5

2.3

9.7

4.1 3.5

*.3 .4

1.2 1.0

1.4 1.2

12.4 7.6

65.8 66.9

9.1 11.2

3.5 2.9

7,2 9.1

.7 1.0

.9 .9

.4 .4

69.9 70.8

8.2 7.7

2.8 5.6

5.5 4.4

2.6 2.2

11.0 9.2

2.9

.7

*.6

1.2

6.3

63.5

16.2

1.8

9.3

1.4

1.0

*.5

65.0

7.6

14.1

3.1

1.9

8.4

1 Excludes “isita with no prior contraceptive methOd.

zjncjude~ “aturat ~eth0d5 and sterilization.

NOTE: Numbers may not add to totals due to rounding.

24
Appendixes

Contents

1. Technical notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

,Survey methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Data collection and processing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Reliability of estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Il. Definitions of terms used inthis report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

111.Clinic Visit Record for Family Planning Semites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Listof appendix tables

1.

Il.

Ill.

Iv.

v.

Estimated number offamily planning visits, by age and race: United States, 1980 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Relative standard error of estimated number of family planning visits, by age and race: United States, 1980 . . . . . .

Numberofsample (unweighted)family planningvisitrecords, byage,visitstatus, andrace:UnitedStates, 1980 . . . . . . . .

Numberofsample (unweighted)family pianningvisitrecords, byvisitstatus, education, Hispanic origin,and contraceptivemethod adopted or continued: United States, 1980 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Range ofrecommended design effectsand designeffectused to determine reliability, byproportion estimates: United

States, 1980 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

26

26

26

27

30

32

27

27

27

28

28

25
Appendix 1. Technical notes

Survey methodology

The National Reporting System for Family Planning Services covers family planning visits to nonmilitary

service sites in the United States, Guam, Puerto Rico,

and the Virgin Islands that offer medical family planning

services. The survey specifically excludes family planning visits to office-based private physicians’ practices;

these visits are included in the National Ambulatory

Medical Care Survey, which is also conducted by the

Division of Health Care Statistics of the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS).

Sampling design.—The data presented in this

report are based on a two-stage stratified sample

survey. The first-stage sampling frame was completed

during the summer of 1976 and updated for 1980. The

frame consisted of a list of family planning service sites

enrolled in the fidl-count surve y (the mode in which the

survey operated until the adoption of the sampling

approach on July 1, 1977). The frame was augmented

by lists of family planning service sites compiled by the

Bureau of Community Health Services of the U.S.

Department of Health and Human Services and by the

Alan Guttmacher Institute, which was then the research

and development division of the Planned Parenthood

Federation of America, Inc. Family planning service

sites identified on more than one list were deleted from

the frame before the sample selection.

Before the sample service sites were chosen, the

sampling frame was arranged into six groups of States

with similar numbers of family planning service sites.

Within each group, each family planning service site

was classified into one of the following three classes

according to reported information for the facility’s

annual number of family planning visits: sites with less

than 1,000 visits, sites with 1,000-3,999 visits, and

sites with 4,000 visits or more. With each of the

sampling strata defined by the six State groups and the

three visit-size classes, the service sites were ordered by

State, type of sponsorship (public health department,

Planned Parenthood a.illliate, hospital, or other), and

county. The sample service sites were systematically

selected from these strata after a random start, with the

probability of selection ranging from certainty to 1 in

18. The 1980 U.S. sample comprised 1,381 sites, with

81.2 percent of the sites participating in the survey.

In the second stage, family planning visits at each

sample site were systematically selected. NCHS assigned to each sample site a sampling rate dependent on

the site’s reported visit volume and the State in which

the site was located. Overall, 14 visit sampling rates

were used to determine the proportion of each site’s

family planning visits needed for the survejq the visit

sampling rates ranged from certainty to 1 in 130.

Data collection and processing

Visit data were either abstracted from the patient’s

medical file or obtained by interviewing the patient.

The primary data collection form was the Clinic Visit

Record, which consists of the survey’s minimum basic

data set (see appendix III). Each sample service site

had the option of collecting data for the survey by

participating in a computerized record system, provided

NCHS criteria for data collection were met., NCHS

required (1) that the record system’s data be based on a

source document that included the survey’s minimum

basic data set and (2) that the procedures and deftitions used to collect such data be consistent with those

specitled for the survey. About 3 of 4 sample service

sites participating in the 1980 survey collected data

through the computerized record system. The remaining sites collected survey data on Clinic Visit Records,

which were submitted to NCHS for processing.

Sampling of visits was made in one of two ways.

Sample service sites that collected visit data for the survey by participating in a computerized record system

usually opted to have the sample visits selected by computer. The remaining sites selected sample visits through

the staflk’ maintenance of visit logs used to list every

patient making a family planning visit. Individuals who

answered “yes” to the screening question “Are you

here to see a health provider (physician, nurse, allied

26
health personnel) about obtaining health services related

to contraception, infertility treatment, or sterilization?”

were listed consecutively on the visit log. Persons

whose names appeared on the last line of each page in

the visit log were selected and data for those visits were

collected. The total number of lines used to list patients

on the family planning visit log was equal to the reciprocal of the sampling fraction used by the site; different

versions of the family planning visit logs corresponded

to each of the 14 sampling rates employed to select

sample visits.

Data processing. -Data processing difYered according to the mode of data submission. Visit data

received on Clinic Visit Records had to be keyed to

machine-readable form before computer processing.

Keying for all data items was independently verified for

100 percent of the Clinic Visit Records. Visit data

received on computer tape or on punched cards from a

computerized record system did not require precomputer processing.

All visit data, regardless of the form of data

submission, were edited by NCHS for completeness

and consistency. Visit records with errors, inconsistencies, or item nonresponse were corrected, if possible,

through followups with the service sites or the computerized record system. Imputation was used for a

specific data item when the overall level of nomesponse for an item was less than 10 percent.

Reliability of estimates

Estimation.-The survey statistics are derived by

a complex estimation procedure used to produce essentially unbiased data. The procedure’s two principal

components are inflation by the reciprocal of the

probability of sample selection and adjustment for

nonresponse.

Sampling error.—The statistics presented in this

report are based on a sample survey and therefore differ

from those that would be based on a fi.dl-count (100-

percent) survey using the same data collection deftitions and procedures. The probability sampling design

allows calculation of estimated standard errors from the

sample data.

The standard error is primarily a measure of the

variability that occurs by change because a sample

rather than the entire sampling frame is surveyed.

While the standard errors calculated for this report

reflect some of the random variation inherent in the

measurement process, they do not measure any systematic error, or bias, that is present in the data. One is

referred to the section “Nonsampling error” for additional information on measurement error.

The probability is about 0.68 that the interval

specified by the estimate plus or minus one standard

error contains the figure that would be obtained through

a fidl-count survey of the sampling frame. The probability is about 0.95 that the interval speciiied by the

estimate plus or minus two standard errors contains the

figure that would be obtained through a full-count

survey of the sampling frame.

To derive standard errors at moderate cost that

would be applicable to a wide variety of statistics,

several approximations were required. It is necessary

to utilize the estimates of domain sizes, relative standard

errors, and sample sizes shown in tables I–IV; table V

provides the range of recommended design effects.

The standard error of proportion estimates maybe ‘

approximated with the design effect approach. For data

horn the National Reporting System for Family Planning Services, the design effect varies with the size of

the base of the proportion (table V). With the selection

Table 1. Estimated number of family planning visits, by age and race:

United States, 1980

Age

Race

All

visits Under 20-24 25-29 30 years

20 years years years and over

Number of visits in thousanda

Allracesl . . . . . . . . . 9,261 3,082 3,491 1,667 1,020

White . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,529 2,195 2,517 1,143 674

Black . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,540 839 909 480 311

1 ln~l~de~ “isit$ for races other than white and black.

Table Il. Relative standard error of estimated number of family planning

viaita, by age and race: United Statea, 1980

Age

Race

All

visits Under 20-24 25-29 30 years

20 years years years and over

Relativa standard error in percent

Allracesl . . . . . . . . . 3.7 4.0 4.1 3.8 4.3

White . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.0 4.7 4.5 3.8 3.6

Black . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.0 4.6 4.9 5.7 7.4

1 Includes races other than white and black.

Table Ill. Number of sample (unweighed) family planning viait records

by age, visit status, and race: United Ststes, 1980

Age

Race

All

visits Under 20-24 25-29 30 years

20 years years years and over

All visitsl . . . . . 397,692 139,405 148,130 69,426 40,731

White . . . . . . . . 287,632 102,118 109,289 48,774 27,451

Black . . . . . . . . . 96,947 33,856 34,209 17,681 11,201

Initial visits . . . 78,014 39,906 22,913 9,315 5,880

White . . . . . . . . 61,347 31,120 18,373 7,342 4,512

Black . . . . . . . . . 12,261 6,957 3,146 1,300 858

Return visits. . . 319,678 99,499 125,217 60,111 34,851

White . . . . . . . . 226,285 70,99B 90,916 41,432 22,939

Black . . . . . . . . . 84,686 26,899 31,063 16,381 10,343

1 ,nc[ude$ vi~it~ for races other than white and black.

27
Table IV, Number of sample (unweighed) family planning visit records, by

visit status, education, Hispanic origin, and contraceptive method

adopted or continued: United States, 1980

Education, Hispanic origin, Visit status

and contraceptive method All visits

adopted or continued Initial Return

All visita . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Education

Less than 12 years.,.....,.,., ., .,.

12 yeara . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,., .

13yeara OrmOre . . . . . . . . . . . . ,., .,.

Hispanic origin

Hispanic . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . ., .,.

Non- Hispanic . ., . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,., .,.

Contraceptive method

adopted or continued

Pill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

IUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,.

Diaphragm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,., .,.

Foam, jelly, or cream.....,.,., ., .,.

Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .,.

None . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .,.

397,692

156,010

160,915

80.767

32,087

365,605

272,848

25,478

24,144

20,143

9,452

45,627

78,014

35,815

27,322

14.877

6,978

71,036

47,402

2,880

5,365

5,329

2,237

14,801

319,678

120,195

133,593

65,890

25,109

294,569

225,446

22,598

18,779

?4,814

7,215

30,826

Table V. Range of recommended design affects and design effect used

to determine reliability, by proportion estimates: United States, 1980

Estimated number of visits Range of Design effact

in base of proportion recommended used to

(domain size) design effects determine reliability

Less than l million . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-6 6

l–3milli0n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-8 8

More than 3 million . . . . . . . . . . 3-1o 10

of larger values in the range of recommended design

* effects, fewer comparisons of survey parameters will

result in significant dtierences. The largest value in

each range of recommended design effects was used to

determine reliability for this report.

Accordingly, the standard error of an estimated

proportion of visits is approximated by the following

formula:

standard error (p) = (DE) ~ ‘(1 ~–P)

where

p = the estimated proportion

n = the number of sample (unweighed) visits in

the base of the proportion

DE= the design effect corresponding to the size of

the estimated base of the proportion p (see

table V)

For example, 76.7 percent (p = 0.767) of the 3,082,000

family planning visits by teenagers were made by

patients who continued or adopted use of the contraceptive pill. The following computation may be used to

determine the standard error for this estimated proportion:

‘tmdmdemOr=10 ~=ooll

where

p= O.767

DE= 10

n = 139,405

and

0.011

‘elative ‘mdard ‘nor = m = 0“014

One also may wish to compute the stanclard error

associated with national aggregate estimates. To calculate the approximate standard error of an aggregate

estimate X, first compute the relative standard error

(RSE) of the proportion (X/Y), where Yis the aggregate estimate for the smallest category of visits listed in

table I containing X population (e.g., if X is the

estimated number offamily planning visits by teenagers

at which the pill was adopted or continued, Y is the

estimated number offamily planning visits by teenagers).

Then

RsE (x)= ~(RSE (xir))z + (RSE(~)Z

and

standard error (X) =X RSE (X).

To continue with the example, one may calculate

the standard error of the estimated 2,365,000 family

planning visits by teenagers at which the pill was continued or adopted.

First, the relative standard error of the proportion

estimate (the estimated proportion of family planning

visits by teenagers at which the pill was aclopted or

continued) is calculated. This was determined to be

0.014. The relative standard error for the base of the

proportion (i.e., estimated total number of family planning visits by teenagers) is provided in table II.

Therefore

RSE (2,365,000)= <(0.014)2+ (0.040)2 ‘= 0.042.

The standard error is the aggregate estimate multiplied

by the RSE:

standard error (2,365,000) =

(0.042) (2,365,000) = 99,330

Nonsampling error.—The data presented in this

report are also subject to nonsampling error including

28
errors due to item nonresponse, information incompletely or inaccurately recorded, and processing error.

In addition, adjustment for service site nonresponse

may introduce nonsampling error in the National Reporting System for Family Planning Services statistics.

In particular, the 1980 National Reporting System for

Family Planning Services was subject to Statewide

nonresponse for several consecutive months, with several such States within a single geographic region. An

adjustment for such nonresponse was made by using a

multiplicative factor to the basic sample visit weight for

each responding sample service site. It is not known

whether this results in overestimation or underestimation of the total number of visits according to visit status

(e.g., initial visits). Other types of visit totals are not

tiected by this adjustment.

During early 1980 the National Center for Health

Statistics conducted a study to identify and measure

nonsampling error associated with data from the National Reporting System for Family Planning Services.ls The study, which included site visits to 174 family planning facilities in the 1980 sample, revealed that

it was not generally possible to verify the number of

medical family planning visits. For example, service

sites frequently did not differentiate between medical

and nomnedical family planning visits. The study indicated that visit totals are probably underestimated, survey definitions and procedures were not always adhered to and patient data were not always updated in

the site’s record system at every visit.

Rounding. —Aggregate estimates of family planning visits are rounded to the nearest thousand. The

percentages were computed based on unrounded estimates, and thus the figures may not sum to the totals.

29
Appendix II. Definitions of

terms used in this report

Clinic. —See “Family planning service site.”

Clinic Visit Record. —The primary data collection

form used by the National Center for Health Statistics

for the National Reporting System for Family Services.

See appendix III for facsimile.

Continuation visit.—A visit by a patient who had

made at least one visit to any family planning service

site during the last calendar year.

Contraception. —Conscientious use of medication,

devices, or practice that permit coitus with reduced

likelihood of conception (commonly known as birth

control).

Contraceptive method.—Any medication, device,

or practice that permits coitus with reduced likelihood

of conception.

Education. —The highest grade of “regular” school

completed (not the highest grade entered). Regular

school refers to any institution in which a person can

earn credits toward an accredited elementary school

certification, high school diploma, or college degree.

Trade schools, beauty schools, business schools, and

the like are excluded unless credits are granted toward

an elementary school certificate, high school diploma,

or college degree.

Family planning service site. —A location where

medical family planning services are provided regularly

under a physician’s supervision. Private physicians’

ofllces and group medical practices are excluded unless

they receive U.S. Department of Health and Human

Services grants for the provision of family planning

services. Military service sites are also excluded from

me survey.

Family planning services. -Medical services that

are primarily related to re@ation of conception; that

is, they enable a person either to reduce the risk of conception (contraceptive services) or to induce conception (infertility services) as desired.

Family planning visit.—A visit to a family planning service site in which medical family planning services related to contraception, infertility treatment, or

sterilization are provided.

Hispanic omgin. —Individuals who consider themselves to be of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Central

or South American, or other Spanish culture or origin,

regardless of race.

Initial visit.—A visit at which the patient receives

medical family planning services from a family pkmning service site for the first time.

Live birth. —A child born alive anytime after conception. For example, twins count as two live births.

Medical services. —The provision of contraceptive

methods, general physical examinations, and other

tests involved in maintaining the health of the patient.

The following services are included:

●

●

o

●

●

●

●

●

●

Pap smear Papanicolaou’s test to detect cervical

cancer.

Pelvic examination Speculum examination of the

vagina and bimanual examination of internal pelvic

organs.

Breast examination: Inspection and palpation of

the breast and axillary glands.

Blood pressure: Routine measurement of a patient’s

blood pressure.

Pregnancy testing: Any test performed to determine pregnancy.

VD testing: Any test to detect the presence of

venereal disease.

Urinalysis (not elsewhere specified): Any test done

on the patient’s urine sample other than for venereal

disease detection or a pregnancy test.

Blood test (not elsewhere specified): Any test of a

patient’s blood except for venereal disease detection or a pregnancy test.

Sterilization: Any procedure or operation that

results in permanent incapability of a person to re30
produce. Examples of such operations or proce- Public assistance incorne.-lhe patient’s family

dures are vasectomies and tubal ligations. income including money from any Federal, State, or

● Infertility treatment Testing to determine causes

local public assistance program. Scholarships, educaof infertility and/or treatment to attempt a reversal tion grants, unemployment benefits, and Social Secuof the patient’s inability to reproduce. rity pensions are not considered public assistance

income.

● Other medical services: Medical family planning Readmission visit.—A family planning visit when

services not specified on the Clinic Visit Record. the last visit occurred more than a year before the surExamples include X-rays and immunizations. vey year.

31
Appendix II1. Clinic visit record

for family planning services

I

U,.% DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE

PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE

HEALTH RESOURCES ADMINISTRATION

NATIONAL CENTER FOR HEALTH STATISTICS

Clinic Visit Record for Family Planning Services

1. SERVICE NUMaER I I I I I I I I

O.M.B. 68-R1137

ASSURANCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY-411 Inf.arm.tlon which would P9rnm id.ntlN.cation of an Indlvldual, ● pracf ice, or an establishment will be held C.a”fldentlal,

wIN be .wd only by Pm$ons engaged In a“d for the purposes of me survey an@ wIN

not a. disclosed m released to other Demons O, used for my other purpose, Provlslo.

of services Is 1. no way m“ttngent on the Oatla”t-s or.avidlng a“y Inform.tlo. for

this f.a,m,

11. PREGNANCY HISTORY I Females only)

N“ mbw

A. Ha”. Yo” .V.X bee” Prefmant?

2 ‘AT1’NT ‘“”SE’ ~ ● ❑ Yes b •NO-G0r0~2

Numb.,

B. How many NW births have YOU h?d?

3. DATE OF THIS VISIT

non C. Oft hem, how many are nbw liring?

4, PATIENTS SEX

D. How nuny of your pregnancies were mded by stillbirth,

a ❑ ,arnale b D ‘ale

induced .bortio”, m mlscardage? (If ,’zero,<’#o to F]

5, ARE YOU OF HISPANIC ORIGIN OR OESCENT?

E. How many of tbe$e pregnancies were ended by induced

abortion s[”.. Ian”ary 1973?

HAND CARD A a ❑ v., baNO F. In what month *“d year did your last pregnancy end

(reg#rdIess of how 11ended)? 1 1

6. PATI EN~S RACE (Cf@ck one box)

Month v,,,

a ❑ White c ❑ Ada. or pxmc (slander

12. CONTRACEPTIVE HISTORY

b ❑ ‘lack d ❑ American Indian or Alaskan Native

A. Have YO” ever used a method of birth confml regularly?

.U.s bDNo--Gotol3

7, WHAT IS YOUR BIRTH 0ATE7

a Oat. ~0 0 U

HAND CARD D

B. What msthod did you last use ragu18rly? (check .// metho& that ,ppIy)

b ❑ !f unknown ask—+aH.awold are Yo”s,?

(No. of Years)

a. PATIENT STATUS

Have you e-r bee” a patient of this or any other clinic for family

planning m- services?

a ❑ Yes bDNO

[f ,<Yes,,, when were you ~ a patient at my 00

clinic for family planninz medical service%?. _ Month

!3. EOUCATION

A. What k the highest grade (cm year) of regular school you ham .mrnplat.<

(C{rcle one number)

012345678910 11121314151617+

(If “zero,”go to 10)

B. Are You presently a student in a regular schoot?

a ❑ Ye,

bnNO

10, FAMILY INCOME AND FAMILY SIZE

HANO CARO 8 and HAND CARD C

A. Which of the following groups represent% your total combined gross

(before deductions) family income for the put 12 months?

aD 0-$1,249 d ❑ $6,250-$8.749 9 ❑ $18.750+

b ❑ $1,250-$3,749 E ❑ $8,750-$13.749 h ❑ UnknOwn

C ❑ $3,750-$6,249 f ❑ $13,750-$1.9,749

3). How many people are in your family, that k, the “urnher

supported by this income?

C. Does this income include .“y public .$aictame?

a ❑ Yes bDNO

D. V/f@ is your relationship to the chief earner?

a ❑ Chl.f earner c ❑ D~ught*rl*n

b ❑ WlfO/HUSband 6 m Other rdatlva

AGENcY USE ONLY

A B c o E F

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

a ❑ Starillzstlo” f ❑ Condom

b ❑ 0,11 (PHI) 9 ❑ Foam/Jelly/Cream

c ❑ IUD h ❑ Natural (Including rhythm)

d ❑ Diaphragm J ❑ Other

e ❑ Inj.ctlon

C. Do You currently uae that method (primary method checked in 12 B)?

a ❑ Yas+Go to E b ❑ No

I I I

D, In what month and year did you stop using that method? ~

E. HOW Ions did !/0” “m that method?

— Days (if 105sthan a month)

— Months (If 1.$s than ● yew)

— ‘fears

F. Where was the method prescribed or obtained?

● ❑ Thb servl.e site e ❑ Drug store (no”prescriptlo. j

b ❑ Cl(nlc or other than this S!tel f ❑ other

c ❑ ~SPital IN other than this tit.1 g ❑ Unkn.awn

d ❑ FrlVata PhYSICIJn

13. MEOICAL SERVICES PROVIOEO AT THIS VISIT

a ig FaP Snlew 9 IJ Urlnmws (n.as.)

b f-J Fnlvic .Xsm h ❑ Blood te$t (n.e.s.)

c ❑ ❑ r*a,t .Xanl I I_J St*rltlzatlOn

d ❑ Bhx.a pr.ss.re k ❑ lnr*~lNty tr@m*nt

e ❑ Pr*gnancy te5tin* m ❑ Othw medlc81s.rvkx$

f ❑ v.o. testing

14, CONTRACEPTIVE METHOO AT THE ENO OF THIS VISIT

A. Method (Chock #// tlwt ●pply)

a ❑ storlllzst 10. f ❑ CQndom

b ~ Oral (Fill) g ❑ Foim/JoNylcroam

e ❑ ,Uo h ❑ Nmural (Includlng rhythm]

d ❑ Diaphragm J ❑ Other

● ❑ l“j*ctl.an k ❑ None

B. If “None,” give rmson (Clr.sck one only)

● ❑ Pr.gnant d H Ottw m.dical reasons

b ❑ In fwtllity !mtlmnt ● ❑ R91YI.Q on Partn. r,% mathod

c ❑ sooldng prq”a”.y f ❑ Dthor

HRA-192-3

6/77

*U.S. GOVSSNMSNT PSINH.NG OFFICE: 1982-361-161:513
Vital and Health Statistics series descriptions

SERIES 1.

SERIES 2.

SERIES 3.

SERIES 4.

SERIES 10

SERIES 11.

SERIES 12,

SERIES 13.

Programs and Collection Procedures. —Reports describing

the general programs of the National Center for Health Stat! stlcs and Its offices and divisions and the data collection

methods used. They also include def!nltlons and other material

necessary for understanding the data.

Data Evaluation and Methods Research.—Studles of new

statistical methodology including experimental tests of new

survey methods, studies of wtal statwtms collection methods,

new analytical techniques, objective evaluations of rellabdny

of collected data, and contributions to statlst!cal theory.

Analytical and Epidemiological Studies. —Reports presenting

analytical or Interpretive studies based on wtal and health statistics, carrying the analysls further than the expository types

of reports m the other series.

Documents and Committee Reports.-Flnal reports of ma)or

committees concerned wnh wtal and health statistics and

documents such as recommended model vital reg!stratlon laws

and rewsed birth and death certificates,

Data From the National Health Interview Survey, -Statwtlcs

on illness, accidental mjurtes, disab[llty, use of hospttal, medical, dental, and other sewlces, and other health-related top!cs,

all based on data collected in the continuing national household !nterwew survey.

Data From the National Health Examination Survey and the

Nationaf Health and Nutrition Examination Survey .-Data

from direct examination, testing, and measurement of national

samples of the cwil!an non!nst!tut!ona ilzerl population provide

the basis for (1 ) estlmatea of the medically defined prevalence

of specific d[seases In the United States and the dlstrtbut!ons

of the population with respect to physical, physiological, and

psychological characteristics and (2) analysis of relationships

among the various measurements without reference to an explicit finite universe of persons.

Data From the Institutionalized Population Surveys.— Discontinued in 1975. Reports from these surveys are Included

in Series 13.

Data on Health Resources Utilization, —Stat[stlcs on the utilization of health manpower and facilities prowding long-term

care, ambulatory care, hospital care, and family planning sewtces.

SERIES 14.

SERIES 15.

SERIES 20.

SERIES 21.

SERIES 22.

SERIES 23.

Data on Health Resources: Manpower and Facilities. —Statistics on the numbers, geographic distribution, and characteristics on health resources including physicians, dentists,

nurses, other health occupations, hospitals, nursing homes,

and outpatient facilities.

Data From Special Surveys. -Statistics on health and healthrelated topics collected in special surveys that are not a part of

the continuing data systems of the National Center for Health

Statistics.

Data on Mortality. -Various statistics on mortality other than

as Included m regular annual or monthly reports, Special

analyses by cause of death, age, and other demographic

variables; geographic and time series analyses; and statistics

on characteristics of deaths not available from the vital records

based on sample surveys of those records,

Data on Natali~, Marriage, and Divorce.—Various statistics

on natalny, marriage, and divorce other than as included in

regular annual or monthly reports. Special analyses by demographic variables; geographic and time series analyses; studies

of fertility: and statistics on characteristics of births not available from the wtal records based on sample suweys of those

records.

Data From the National Mortality and Natality Surveys.—

Discontinued in 1975, Reporte from these sample suweys

based on vital records are included in Series 20 and 21,

respectively.

Data From the National Survey of Family Growth. -Statistics

on fertility, family formation and dissolution, family planning,

and related maternal and Infant health topics derived from a

periodic survey of a nationwide probability sample of evermarried women 15–44 years of age.

For a I!st of titles of reports published in these series, write to:

Scientific and Technical information Branch

National Center for Health Statistics

Public Haalth Service

Hyattsville, Md. 20782
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Publlc Health Service

Off Ice of Health Research, Stat] stlcs, and Technology

National Center for Health Statlst!cs

3700 East-West Hrghway

Hyattswlle, Maryland 20782

OFFICIAL BUSINESS

PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE, $300

From the Office of Health Research, Statistics, and Technology

DHHS Publ!cat!on No. (PHS)82–1729, Ser!es 13, No 68

POSTAGE AND FEES PAID /-

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HHS

HHS 396 I

.A S

.

THIRD CLASS

11

I. LS.MAIL

For a listing of publications in the VITAL AND HEALTH STATISTICS SERIES call 301-436 -NCHS