# Patent

## Title
Electrophoretic display design

## Abstract

The present invention is directed to electrophoretic displays comprising microcups of a first shape and the microcups of a second shape, wherein each of the microcups of the first shape is surrounded by the microcups of the second shape, and the second shape is 90% or less of the first shape in area. The present electrophoretic displays comprise novel microcup designs, which may reduce the appearance of defects in the display images.

## Background
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/596,075, filed Feb. 7, 2012; which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed to electrophoretic display designs, aiming to reduce noticeable defects of display images, without changing the fill factor of the display cells.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
U.S. Pat. No. 6,930,818 discloses an electrophoretic display based on the microcup technology. The patent describes the manufacture of microcups as display cells, by microembossing or imagewise exposure. The microcups are then filled with an electrophoretic fluid comprising charged pigment particles dispersed in a solvent or solvent mixture.
The top openings of the microcups traditionally may have the same size and shape and such microcups spread across the entire display surface. For example, all of the microcups may have a top opening of a square shape on the viewing side or all of the microcups may have a top opening of a hexagonal shape on the viewing side. For this type of design, one disadvantage is that if the partition wall between the two neighboring microcups has a defect, the two microcups will become connected. As a result, the defective wall provides a fluid path for the particles to move from one microcup to the next microcup. Due to the pumping action of operating the display, one microcup will turn white and one black, producing a visual display defect.



BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIGS. 1 and 2 depict two examples of the microcup arrangement of the present invention.
FIG. 3 illustrates the fill factor.
FIG. 4 depicts the cross-section view of a microcup structure having a single wall between the microcups.
FIG. 5 depicts the cross-section view of a microcup structure having a double wall between the microcups.
FIG. 6 illustrates different designs of the double partition wall.
FIGS. 7a and 7b show a display device comprising the double wall structure between the microcups.
FIG. 8 illustrates the bridge in the channel of a double wall.
FIG. 9 shows a top view of microcups with bridges in the channel of a double wall.
FIG. 10 shows the dimensions of a double wall.



SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The first aspect of the present invention is directed to an electrophoretic display comprising microcups of a first shape and the microcups of a second shape, wherein
a) both types of the microcups are filled with an electrophoretic fluid,
b) each of the microcups of the first shape is surrounded by the microcups of the second shape, and
c) the second shape is 90% or less of the first shape in area.
In one embodiment, the first shape is square and the second shape is rectangle. In another embodiment, the first shape is hexagon and the second shape is triangle. In one embodiment, the microcups have double walls.
The second aspect of the present invention is directed to an electrophoretic display comprising microcups wherein the microcups are filled with an electrophoretic fluid and have double walls.
In one embodiment, the display further comprises bridges between the two layers of the double wall. In one embodiment, the width of the base area of the double wall is about 10 to about 60 microns. In one embodiment, the width of the individual top area of the double wall is about 5 to about 20 microns. In one embodiment, the width of the total top area of the double wall is about 10 to about 60 microns.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The first aspect of the present invention is directed to a design of the microcup arrangement.
In this design, the microcups are divided into two groups. The first group has a first shape and the second group has a second shape. In the context of this aspect of the present invention, the term “shape” refers to the two-dimensional shape of the top opening of a microcup, on the viewing side.
One microcup of the first shape is surrounded by the microcups of the second shape. Therefore, either there is no contact at all between any two microcups of the first shape or two microcups of the first shape may have only contact points.
FIG. 1 depicts an example in which a microcup of a first shape (square) (11) is surrounded by the microcups of a second shape (rectangular) (12). As shown, in this case, there is no contact between any two microcups of the first shape (11).
FIG. 2 is another example in which a microcup of a first shape (hexagonal) (21) is surrounded by the microcups of a second shape (triangular) (22). In this case, between the two microcups of the first shape, there are only contact points (23) and no wall contact between the microcups of the first shape.
The microcups of the second shape, in general, are smaller than the microcups of the first shape, in area. For example, the second shape may be 90% or less of the first shape, in area.
This unique microcup arrangement has the advantage that if there is defect in the partition wall between two neighboring microcups, the defect appearing between two neighboring microcups will be less noticeable by the naked eyes than the defect appearing between two neighboring microcups of the same larger size.
In addition, the fill factor is not changed significantly from that in a microcup pattern in which all of the microcups have the same shape.
The fill factor is determined by the area other than the wall area divided by the entire area. As shown in FIG. 3, the fill factor is the sum of the area “A” divided by the sum of the area A and the area W (the wall area). The fill factor is important for image brightness.
In order to reduce the defect size, one may attempt to use microcups of the same shape but of a smaller size. However, for structural integrity, the thickness of the partition wall between the microcups has a lower limit. Therefore, to reduce the size of the microcups, one can only reduce the size of area “A” in FIG. 3. As a result, reducing the size of the microcups would inevitably lower the fill factor, thus causing the optical performance of the display device to suffer.
The second aspect of the invention is directed to a microcup structure having a double wall between the microcups.
FIGS. 4 and 5 are cross-section view of microcup structures. FIG. 4 is a microcup structure having a single wall (41) between the microcups (40). FIG. 5 illustrates the present invention with a double wall (51) between the microcups (50).
FIG. 6 shows different designs of the double wall.
The microcups are typically formed on a light transmissive electrode layer (72) (such as an indium tin oxide layer), as shown in FIG. 7a. The microcups are then filled with a display fluid (73) and sealed with a sealing layer (74). The channel (75) between the two layers of the double wall is also filled and sealed. The filled and sealed microcups are then laminated with a second electrode layer (76), optionally with an adhesive layer (not shown).
The microcup structure is usually viewed from the side of the light transmissive layer, as shown in FIG. 7b. For ease of illustration, FIG. 7b is the same as FIG. 7a, except turned 180°. While the channel portions (75) are filled with the display fluid, they have very little effect visually on the display.
However, since the channels between the two layers of the double wall are connected throughout, if any one side of a double wall is damaged, the particles in the microcups may be pumped into this large connected area. Such a large connected area therefore may raise the defect probability. Consequently, it may be desirable to have bridges (81) between the two layers of the double walls as shown in FIG. 8 to prevent the channels from forming a connected large area.
FIG. 9 is the top view of microcups with the double walls and bridges (91). It is preferable to have one bridge for each side of a microcup; however, this is not always necessary.
FIG. 10 shows the possible dimensions of a double wall. In one embodiment, the width (“a”) of the base may be about 10 to about 60 microns. The width (“b”) of each individual top area may be about 5 to about 20 microns and the total width (“c”) of the top area may be about 10 to about 60 microns.
It is noted that the microcups in the first aspect of the present invention may also have double walls.
The microcups of the present invention, in both aspects of the invention, may be manufactured by the microembossing process described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,930,818, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The formed microcups may then be filled and sealed also according to disclosures in this US patent.
The microcapsule-type display cells may also have double walls by having two layers of shell over the display fluid. They may be prepared by methods known in the art.
While the present invention has been described with reference to the specific embodiments thereof, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation, materials, compositions, processes, process step or steps, to the objective, spirit and scope of the present invention. All such modifications are intended to be within the scope of the claims appended hereto.

## Claims

1. An electrophoretic display comprising a viewing side which consists of two types of microcups, microcups of a first shape which has four or six sides and microcups of a second shape that is different from the first shape, wherein
a) the two types of the microcups are filled with an electrophoretic fluid,
b) the entire length of each of the four or six sides of one of the microcups of the first shape is shared with one of the microcups of the second shape, and each of the microcups of the first shape is surrounded by the microcups of the second shape in the entire viewing side, and
c) the second shape is 90% or less of the first shape in area.

2. The display of claim 1, wherein the first shape is square and the second shape is rectangle.

3. The display of claim 1, wherein the first shape is hexagon and the second shape is triangle.

4. The display of claim 1, wherein the microcups have double walls separating any two neighboring microcups.