alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §13723. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 103–322, title II, §20410, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1828; Pub. L. 105–33, title XI, §11717(b), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 786, related to expansion of the District of Columbia Corrections Facility at Lorton, Virginia, and was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Keith Adams, Appellant.

[820 NYS2d 799]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (James A. Yates, J.), rendered on or about August 5, 2004, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice. Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Friedman, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.
### §14043b–1. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 14043b–1 was editorially reclassified as section 12442 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-16-0081:  Notice of Intent to Publish Revision to the Enforcement Policy Table of Base Civil Penalties.

Accession Number: ML16125A205

Date Released: Friday, July 8, 2016

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML16125A215 - SECY-16-0081:  Notice of Intent to Publish Revision to the Enforcement Policy Table of Base Civil Penalties. (4 page(s), 6/20/2016)
    - ML16125A211 - SECY-16-0081:  Enclosure 1 - Notice of Intent to Publish Revision to the Enforcement Policy Table of Base Civil Penalties (FRN and CPA). (8 page(s), 6/20/2016)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### In the Matter of Santley Isquith, as General Guardian of Aaron Isquith, an Infant, Appellant, against Arthur Levitt et al., Constituting the Board of Education of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.

Petitioner’s son was born on January 12, 1949. In September, 1953, the child was admitted to afternoon kindergarten at Public School 161, Brooklyn. After the child reached the age of five on January 12, 1954, two attempts were made to have him registered for first grade at that school, but such registration was refused. This article 78 proceeding was thereafter brought to direct the board of education to register the child in the first grade, on the ground that a child of five years of age is entitled to attend public school (Education Law, § 3202, subd. 1), and a kindergarten is not within the term public school. The application was denied. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Once a kindergarten has been established, it becomes a part of the public school system, despite the fact that the maintenance of a kindergarten is discretionary with the board of education. When petitioner’s child reached the age of five years, he was entitled to attend public school (Education Law, § 3202, subd. 1), but his parents did not have the right to insist that the child be admitted to a particular grade or class in the public school. After a child is admitted to a public school, the board of education has the power to provide rules and regulations for promotion from grade to grade, based not on age, but on training, knowledge and ability. *(Matter of Clark,*67 N. Y. St. Dept. Rep. 3; *Matter of Barrett,*50 N. Y. St. Dept. Rep. 481.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 89 FR 71805, Sept. 4, 2024.

§ 1.72 Restrictions on customer clearing arrangements. No futures commission merchant providing clearing services to customers shall enter into an arrangement that: ( a ) Discloses to the futures commission merchant or any swap dealer or major swap participant the identity of a customer's original executing counterparty;
( b ) Limits the number of counterparties with whom a customer may enter into a trade;
( c ) Restricts the size of the position a customer may take with any individual counterparty, apart from an overall limit for all positions held by the customer at the futures commission merchant;
( d ) Impairs a customer's access to execution of a trade on terms that have a reasonable relationship to the best terms available; or
( e ) Prevents compliance with the timeframes set forth in § 1.74(b), § 23.610(b), or § 39.12(b)(7) of this chapter.
[77 FR 21306, Apr. 9, 2012]
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________
No. 24

- 11516

Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________
TERRENCE EUGENE SMITH, SR., PAMELA KATHLEEN ASHE

- SMITH,
Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

versus WAFFLE HOUSE, INC., c/o Gregory Newman,

Defendant

- Appellee.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia USCA11 Case: 24-11516 Document: 11-1 Date Filed: 07/01/2024 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 24

- 11516

D.C. Docket No. 1:23

- cv

- 02136

- SDG

____________________
Before R OSENBAUM , L UCK , and L AGOA , Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte , for lack of jurisdiction. The 30

- day statutory time limit required Terrence Smith, Sr., and Pamela Ashe

- Smith (“the Smiths”) to file a notice of appeal from the district court’s April 1, 2024 final judgment on or before May 1, 2024. See 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). However, the Smiths did not file a notice of appeal until May 6,
2024.
Furth er, there is no basis in the record for relief under Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5) or 4(a)(6). See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) (providing that a party may move to extend the time for filing a notice of appeal within 30 days of expiration of the appeal period )
, 4(a)(6) (providing that the court may reopen the timeto file an appeal for a period of 14 days where a party does not receive notice of the entry of the judgment within 21 days of its entry and other requirements are met ). Accordingly, t he notice of appeal is untimely and cannot invoke our appellate jurisdiction. See Hamer v. Neighborhood Hous. Servs. of Chi. , 138 S. Ct. 13, 21 (2017). No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 1 1th Cir. R. 40

- 3 and all other applicable rules. USCA11 Case: 24-11516 Document: 11-1 Date Filed: 07/01/2024 Page: 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER****PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Spectrum Sciences & Software Holdings Corp. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Darryl K. Horne, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant toss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.By: /s/DARRYL K. HORNE
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-16-0075: Proposed Merger of the Offices of New Reactors and Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Accession Number: ML16083A028

Date Released: Wednesday, March 23, 2016

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML16083A485 - SECY-16-0075:  Proposed Merger of the Offices of New Reactors and Nuclear Reactor Regulation (6 page(s), 6/9/2016)
    - ML16083A530 - SECY-16-0075:  Enclosure 1 - Business Case for Merging the Office of New Reactors and the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (15 page(s), 6/8/2016)
    - ML16084A155 - SECY-16-0075:  Enclosure 2 - Reorganization Plan to Merge the Office of New Reactors and the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (19 page(s), 6/8/2016)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3539 

To terminate the HOPE VI program of the Department of Housing and 

Urban Development. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 1, 2011 

Mr. CANSECO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on Appropriations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To terminate the HOPE VI program of the Department 

of Housing and Urban Development. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘HOPE VI Program 

5 Termination Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF HOPE VI PROGRAM. 

7 (a) REPEAL OF GRANT AUTHORITY.—Section 24 of 

8 the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437v) 

9 is hereby repealed. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3539 IH

1 (b) TREATMENT OF REMAINING FUNDS.—Notwith2 standing the repeal under subsection (a) of this section, 

3 any amounts made available under section 24 of the 

4 United States Housing Act of 1937 and obligated before 

5 the date of the enactment of this Act shall continue to 

6 be governed by such section, as in effect immediately be7 fore such repeal, and any other applicable provisions of 

8 law. 

9 (c) TERMINATION.—Upon the completion of outlays 

10 to liquidate all amounts referred to in subsection (b) of 

11 this section and the completion of all activities with re12 spect to such amounts pursuant to subsection (b), the Sec13 retary of Housing and Urban Development shall terminate 

14 the HOPE VI program authorized under section 24 of the 

15 United States Housing Act of 1937. 

16 (d) RESCISSION OF FUNDING.—Effective on the date 

17 of the enactment of this Act, there are rescinded and per18 manently canceled all unobligated balances remaining 

19 available as of such date of enactment of any amounts 

20 made available under section 24 of the United States 

21 Housing Act of 1937. All such unobligated balances so re22 scinded and permanently canceled shall be covered into the 

23 General Fund of the Treasury for reducing the budget def24 icit of the Federal Government. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### § 1212.1 Scope, application, and effective date.

This part 1212, a consumer product safety standard, prescribes requirements for multi-purpose lighters. These requirements are intended to make the multi-purpose lighters subject to the standard's provisions resistant to successful operation by children younger than 5 years of age. This standard applies to all multi-purpose lighters, as defined in § 1212.2, that are manufactured in the United States, or imported, on or after December 22, 2000.
### §1320b–16. Public disclosure of certain information on hospital financial interest and referral patterns

The Secretary shall make available to the public, in a form and manner specified by the Secretary, information disclosed to the Secretary pursuant to section 1395cc(a)(1)(S) of this title.

(Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XI, §1146, as added Pub. L. 105–33, title IV, §4321(c), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 395.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 105–33, title IV, §4321(d)(2), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 395, provided that: "The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall issue regulations by not later than the date which is 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act [Aug. 5, 1997] to carry out the amendments made by subsections (b) and (c) [enacting this section and amending section 1395cc of this title] and such amendments shall take effect as of such date (on or after the issuance of such regulations) as the Secretary specifies in such regulations."
#### In the Matter of George Light, Respondent, against Sidney S. Schupper et al., Appellants.

The issues raised by the third party’s assertion of a retaining lien upon the shares of stock in question may not be summarily determined in an application under section 796 of the Civil Practice Act. They must be resolved in an appropriate action brought by a receiver in supplementary proceedings. Accordingly, the order appealed from is modified, without costs, so as to strike provisions of the appointment of a referee, and the matter is remitted to Special Term for the appointment of a receiver. Settle order on notice. Present — Callahan, J. P., Breitel, Bastow, Botein and Bergan, JJ.
#### Henry Grieme, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Stockholders of the Grove Hill Realty Company, Appellant, v. Grove Hill Realty Company and Another, Respondents.

Order reversed and judgment modified by striking out the provision for an extra allowance, and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant. No opinion. Order to be settled on notice. Present—Clarke, P. J., Scott, Dowling, Smith and Page, JJ.
#### Carl Junk v. Terry & Tench Company.

Application granted. Order signed. Present—Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Smith, JJ.
Memorandum 

US. Department of ~c • [ Yc :, l f\ q: 3 0 

Transportation 

Office of the Secretary 

of TransportatiOn 

Subject: 

From: 

To: 

Notice of Communication in Docket: 

DOT -OST -OST -2012-0029 

Special Rules for Ronald Reag 

Airport (beyond-perimeter ex 

Secretary Ray LaHood 

\ 

Chief, Dockets \ 

Date: 

Reply to 

Attn. of: 

April 16, 2012 

\i 

In accordance with Department rules (14 CFR Part 300), I am reporting the following 

communication. 

On April16, 2012, during a telephone conversation with Governor Luis 

Fortufio from Puerto Rico, the Governor raised the subject of the 

Department's proceeding to allocate eight slot exemptions to new entrant 

and/ or limited incumbent carriers for operations between Ronald Reagan 

Washington National Airport (DCA) and airports beyond the 1,250-mile 

DCA perimeter. The Governor expressed his support for the application 

filed by JetBlue Airways for nonstop service between DCA and San Juan. 

I informed the Governor that, while I appreciated his interest in this case, I 

could not comment on its merits because the proceeding was under active 

consideration by the Department. 

Please place this memorandum in the appropriate Docket. 

cc: Governor Luis Fortufio
### SUBCHAPTER XX–B—GRANT PROGRAM TO EVALUATE AND IMPROVE EDUCATIONAL METHODS AT PRISONS, JAILS, AND JUVENILE FACILITIES
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 20, 2004, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), U.S. Product Data Association (“US PRO”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: U.S. Product Data Association, North Charleston, SC. The nature and scope of US PRO's standards development activities are: To provide the management functions for the IGES/PDES Organization (IPO) and its related activities, including the U.S. Technical Advisory Group (TAG) to ISO TC184/SC4.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-26216  Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3676 

To amend the detainee provisions of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2012 to specifically state that United States citizens 

may not be detained against their will without all the rights of due 

process afforded to citizens in a court ordained or established by or 

under Article III of the Constitution of the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 15, 2011 

Mr. LANDRY (for himself, Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina, Mr. BUCSHON, Mr. 

HUELSKAMP, Mr. GRAVES of Georgia, Mr. WALSH of Illinois, Mr. 

ROKITA, Mr. LABRADOR, Mr. HARRIS, Mr. STUTZMAN, Mr. RIBBLE, Mr. 

DESJARLAIS, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. ROE of Tennessee, Mr. GOWDY, Mr. 

MULVANEY, Mr. REED, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. CLARKE of Michigan, and 

Mr. GOSAR) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign 

Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the detainee provisions of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 to specifically 

state that United States citizens may not be detained 

against their will without all the rights of due process 

afforded to citizens in a court ordained or established 

by or under Article III of the Constitution of the United 

States. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3676 IH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DUE PROCESS RIGHTS OF UNITED STATES CITI4 ZENS. 

5 (a) APPLICATION TO DETAINEE PROVISIONS.—Sub6 section (e) of section 1021 of the National Defense Au7 thorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 is amended to read 

8 as follows: 

9 ‘‘(e) PROTECTIONS.— 

10 ‘‘(1) UNITED STATES CITIZENS.—In applying 

11 this section and section 1022, no United States cit12 izen may be detained against his or her will without 

13 all the rights of due process afforded to the citizen 

14 in a court ordained or established by or under Arti15 cle III of the Constitution of the United States. 

16 ‘‘(2) LAWFUL RESIDENT ALIENS AND OTHER

17 PERSONS IN THE UNITED STATES.—Nothing in this 

18 section shall be construed to affect existing law or 

19 authorities relating to the detention of lawful resi20 dent aliens of the United States or any other per21 sons who are captured or arrested in the United 

22 States.’’. 

23 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

24 subsection (a) shall take effect as of the date of the enactVerDate Mar 15 2010 23:03 Dec 20, 2011 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3676.IH H3676

srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3676 IH

1 ment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

2 Year 2012. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-16-0022:  Report to Congress on Abnormal Occurrences: Fiscal Year 2015

Accession Number: ML15352A225

Date Released: Friday, June 3, 2016

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML15352A228 - SECY-16-0022: Report to Congress on Abnormal Occurrences: Fiscal Year 2015 (3 page(s), 3/1/2016)
    - ML15352A234 - SECY-16-0022: Enclosure 1 - Draft Report to Congress on Abnormal Occurrences, Fiscal Year 2015 (35 page(s), 3/1/2016)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### In the Matter of David Casselman, Appellant, v Village of Lowville, Respondent.

[823 NYS2d 116]

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Gorski, J.P., Martoche, Smith, Green and Pine, JJ.
---

---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of ACRO Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,
2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Gadi Aner, the Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 13, 2007

|/s/ Gadi Aner
Gadi AnerChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 



---

---