In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19-319V

(not to be published)

SHARI BAELFYR,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: May 20, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Attorney’s Fees and Costs

Shealene Priscilla Mancuso, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner.

Ryan Daniel Pyles, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS1

On February 28, 2019, Shari Baelfyr, (“Petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation 

under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et 

seq.,

2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to 

vaccine administration as a result of an influenza vaccine administered on October 1, 

2017. (Petition at 1). On April 17, 2020, a decision was issued awarding compensation to 

Petitioner based on the Respondent’s proffer. (ECF No. 33). 

 1 Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am 

required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the EGovernment Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic 

Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the 

internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact 

medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. 

If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from 

public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
2

Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, dated April 29, 

2020, (ECF No. 37), requesting a total award of $10,371.37 (representing $9,522.20 in 

fees and $849.17 in costs). In accordance with General Order #9, counsel for Petitioner

represents that Petitioner incurred no out-of-pocket expenses. (Id. at 2). Respondent 

reacted to the motion on April 29, 2020, indicating that he is satisfied that the statutory 

requirements for an award of attorney’s fees and costs are met in this case and defers to 

the Court’s discretion to determine the amount to be awarded. (ECF No. 38). By email 

correspondence on April 30, 2020, counsel for Petitioner informed the staff attorneys 

office that Petitioner did not intend to file a reply. See Informal Remark, April 30, 2020.

I have reviewed the billing records submitted with Petitioner’s request. In my 

experience, the request appears reasonable, and I find no cause to reduce the requested 

hours or rates. 

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. § 

15(e). Accordingly, I hereby GRANT Petitioner’s Motion for attorney’s fees and costs. I

award a total of $10,371.37 (representing $9,522.20 in fees and $849.17 in costs) as a 

lump sum in the form of a check jointly payable to Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel. In 

the absence of a timely-filed motion for review (see Appendix B to the Rules of the Court), 

the Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master

 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice 

renouncing their right to seek review.