alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-1743

_____________________________

COURTNEY LAMAR DAVIS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Angela M. Cox, Judge.

May 3, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, BILBREY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and A. Victoria Wiggins, 

Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Virginia Harris, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
§ 1202.6 Marking. ( a ) The manufacturer's or private labeler's name and city or a symbol which will identify the name and city shall appear on the matchbook. In addition, every private labeler must label the matchbook with a code which enables it to identify, if requested, the manufacturer of the product.
( b ) Boxes or cartons in which two or more caddies are shipped shall be marked “For safety, store in a cool, dry place.”
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Amelia Schaefer, Appellant, against James J. Sexton et al., as Commissioners of Taxes and Assessments of the City of New York, Respondents. [450 W. 162nd St., Borough of Manhattan.]

No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6418** 

ANTONIO VERA ALANIS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (Federal Bureau of Prisons); SAMUEL STANLEY; W. MCCOLLUM; J. BRADFORD , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. William A. Webb , Magistrate Judge. ( 5:10

- ct

- 03073

- BO )

Submitted : June 21, 2012 Decided: June 26, 2012

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Antonio Vera Alanis, Appellant Pro Se. Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina; William Eric Freeman, MOORE & VAN ALLEN, Morrisville, North Ca rolina; Drew Kyle Kifner, MOORE & VAN ALLEN, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Antonio Vera Alanis appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six
Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388
(1971) and the Federal Tort Claims Act . We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by t he district court. Alanis v. United

States , No. 5:10

- ct

- 3073

- BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 6, 2011) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the deci sional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Zingo,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the  quarter  ended June 30,  2006 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Holly Roseberry, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section  13(a) or  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934;  and (2) The
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                                /s/ Holly Roseberry
                                                ---------------------
                                                Holly Roseberry
                                                Chief Executive Officer and
                                                Principal Financial Officer


August 11 , 2006
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-12-0160 - Proposed Rule: 10 CFR 2.802, "Petition for Rulemaking Process" (RIN 3150-AI30); Expanded Authority of Executive Director for Operations to Deny Petitions for Rulemaking Under Management Directive 6.3

Accession Number: ML120440461

Date Released: Friday, December 14, 2012

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML120450013 - SECY-12-0160 - Proposed Rule: Petition for Rulemaking Process (RIN 3150-AI30); Expanded Authority of EDO to Deny Petitions for Rulemaking under Management Directive 6.3. (11 page(s), 11/30/2012)
    - ML120440531 - SECY-12-0160 - Enclosure - Proposed Rule: Petition for Rulemaking Process (48 page(s), 11/30/2012)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### § 300.34 Reference to existing guaranty on labels not permitted.

No representation or suggestion that a wool product is guaranteed under the act by the Government, or any branch thereof shall be made on or in the stamp, tag, label, or other mark of identification, applied or affixed to wool products.
No:13-095 November 8, 2013

CONTACT: Maureen Conley, 301-415-8200 

NRC Proposes New Rules for Control and Accounting

of Special Nuclear Material

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is asking the public to comment on a proposal to update, 

clarify and strengthen the requirements for material control and accounting (MC&A) of special nuclear 

material. The proposed rule appears in today’s Federal Register.

The NRC requires licensees to control and account for plutonium, enriched uranium and 

uranium-233, also known as special nuclear material. Plutonium and uranium-233 can be produced in 

nuclear reactors, while enriched uranium is created in a uranium enrichment facility. The MC&A 

program coupled with physical protection and information security programs helps to ensure these 

materials are not taken from facilities that possess them.

The proposed rule would change the requirements for collecting and reporting information on 

these materials. It adds new requirements for certain licensees that have 350 grams or more of special 

nuclear material, strengthens other requirements, applies the rules to more licensees, and clarifies terms 

and language.

Comments will be accepted through February 18, 2014. They may be submitted over the federal 

government’s rulemaking website at www.Regulations.gov using Docket ID NRC-2009-0096; by email 

to Rulemaking.Comments@nrc.gov: by fax to 301-415-1101; or by mail to Cindy Bladey, Chief, Rules, 

Announcements, and Directives Branch, Office of Administration, Mail Stop: TWB-05-B01M, U.S. 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, 20555-0001.
§ 1051.7 Statement in support of or in opposition to petitions; Duty of petitioners to remain apprised of developments regarding petitions. ( a ) Any person may file a statement with the Office of the Secretary in support of or in opposition to a petition prior to Commission action on the petition. Persons submitting statements in opposition to a petition are encouraged to provide copies of such statements to the petitioner.
( b ) It is the duty of the petitioner, or any person submitting a statement in support of or in opposition to a petition, to keep himself or herself apprised of developments regarding the petition. Information regarding the status of petitions is available from the Office of the Secretary of the Commission.
( c ) The Office of the Secretary shall send to the petitioner a copy of the staff briefing package on his or her petition at the same time the package is transmitted to the Commissioners for decision.
No: 13-038 May 17, 2013

CONTACT: Eliot Brenner, 301-415-8200 

Statement of NRC Chairman Allison M. Macfarlane

on the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Decision

in the San Onofre Confirmatory Action Letter Adjudication

This past Monday, May 13, a three-judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB) 

released its decision that the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) Confirmatory Action 

Letter (CAL) process should be considered a license amendment proceeding that affords the 

opportunity for a hearing. 

If a party, including the NRC staff, Southern California Edison, or Friends of the Earth,

wishes to file an appeal of the ASLB’s decision with the Commission, it must do so within 25 days (by 

June 7). Under NRC’s regulations, the Commission itself may also opt to review the decision. Until the 

time for appeal or Commission review expires, the Commission serves in an adjudicatory capacity, 

similar to a court of appeals, and must remain neutral to preserve the fairness and transparency of the 

adjudicatory process. For this reason, my Commission colleagues and I are restricted in our ability to 

comment on this decision.

The NRC understands that there is significant public interest in the opportunity for a hearing 

and we will provide more information about the ASLB decision after further review of that decision 

and after the appeal period has elapsed.

SONGS Units 2 and 3 have been shut down since early 2012 due to steam generator 

problems. In March 2012, the NRC issued a “Confirmatory Action Letter” (CAL) to Southern 

California Edison Company, which operates SONGS. The CAL confirmed the NRC’s understanding of 

several actions the company agreed to take with respect to the steam generators before the NRC could 

decide if the units were safe to restart. 

Shortly after the NRC issued the CAL, Friends of the Earth, a nongovernmental organization, 

filed a hearing request that challenged aspects of the CAL. As part of its hearing request, Friends of the 

Earth argued that the CAL process is a de facto license amendment, and that the public should be 

provided an opportunity to request a public hearing under the Atomic Energy Act. Late last year, the 

Commission referred this portion of the Friends of the Earth’s hearing request to the Atomic Safety and 

Licensing Board Panel (ASLBP) for adjudication. The ASLBP conducts hearings and performs other 

regulatory functions as authorized by the Commission.

The NRC will not allow the plant to restart until we are satisfied that Southern California 

Edison can operate the plant safely. Before making a decision on restart, the NRC must complete all 
Page | 2

inspection activities related to the CAL, its technical review of the safety bases for the steam generator 

tube integrity, and its review of the license amendment request for Unit 2. Throughout this process, the 

licensee has provided answers to NRC’s questions and the NRC has posed additional questions to the 

licensee where further clarification is needed. This process is ongoing.
#### William Rubin, Respondent, v. 675 Walton Avenue Corp. et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. -Glennon and Cohn, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm.
Exhibit 31.4
 
 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
 THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Robert L. Lane, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of Sunnova Energy International Inc.; and
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
 
 Date:March 6, 2020/s/ Robert L. LaneRobert L. LaneChief Financial Officer
No: 14-091 December 23, 2014

CONTACT: Holly Harrington, 301-415-8200 

Stephen G. Burns Becomes Agency’s 16th Chairman 

Stephen G. Burns, a 33-year-veteran of the agency and an NRC Commissioner since November, 

has been designated as Chairman by President Barack Obama effective Jan. 1, 2015. Burns replaces 

outgoing Chairman Allison Macfarlane, who is stepping down to take a position at George Washington 

University.

“I am pleased to have been selected to serve as the NRC’s next Chairman. It is a great honor to 

lead the agency to which I dedicated most of my professional career,” Burns said. “I extend my thanks 

to Dr. Macfarlane for her service and wish her success in her new position. I look forward to working 

with my fellow Commissioners, the NRC staff and our stakeholders in carrying out the NRC's 

important mission.” 

The NRC Commission is made up of five Commissioners, one of whom is designated by the 

President as Chairman. The Commission is a collegial body that formulates policies, develops 

regulations, issues orders and adjudicates legal matters. The NRC Commissioners serve five-year 

terms, with one term expiring every year on June 30. Burns’ term expires in 2019.

Burns is the second career General Counsel to be named Chairman since Marcus A. Rowden, 

General Counsel for the Atomic Energy Commission, became the new agency’s second Chairman in 

1976.

Before returning to the NRC, Burns was the Head of Legal Affairs of the Nuclear Energy 

Agency of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development in Paris. Prior to that 

position, Burns had served at the NRC in a variety of roles, including as the agency’s General Counsel

from 2009 to 2012. He began his career at the NRC as an attorney in the Regional Operations and 

Enforcement Division in 1978. 

Burns received a bachelor's degree, magna cum laude, in 1975 from Colgate University in 

Hamilton, NY. He received his law degree with honors in 1978 from the George Washington 

University in Washington, D.C., where he was an editor on the George Washington Law Review.

During his tenure at the NRC, Mr. Burns received the Distinguished Service Award in 2001 and 

the Presidential Meritorious Executive Rank Award in 1998 and 2008.
#### The State of Nebraska, plaintiff in error, v. Stillman N. White, defendant in error.

This was a case brought up by petition in error from the district court for Butler county. It was an action brought by White to recover $188.09, money alleged to have been paid for school lands of the state purchased by White, but which, as alleged in the petition, the officer acting for the state had no authority to sell. The state demurred to the petition, which, upon argument before Íost, J., was overruled, and the state electing to stand on its demurrer, judgment was entered in favor of White for the principal and interest of his claim, amounting to $620.03.

*W. Millet <& Son,*for plaintiff in error.

*G. J. Phelps*for defendant in error.

Lake, J.

This case is clearly within the rule announced in the case of *The State v. Stout,*decided at this term. There is no law by which the defendant in error can maintain his pretended claim against the state. It is not one which the auditor is authorized to allow, and consequently was properly rejected by that officer when presented to him for audit. Besides, under the rule referred to, even if the claim were a valid one, the only mode by which the decision of the auditor can be reviewed is by appeal.

The judgment of the district court having been rendered without jurisdiction, must be reversed, and the case dismissed, at the cost of the defendant in error. .

Judgment accordingly.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-1210

___________ United States of America, * * Plaintiff-Appellee, * * v. * * Appeal from the United States $29,000, also known as Elita * District Court for the Western Crossland, also known as Thomas Scott * District of Arkansas. Crossland, in United States Currency; * * [UNPUBLISHED] Defendant, * * Scott Crossland, also known as Thomas * Scott Crossland, * * Claimant-Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: September 2, 2003 Filed: September 15, 2003

___________ Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.* The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. -2- Scott Crossland appeals from the district court’s * adverse grant of summary judgment in Crossland's civil forfeiture action, contending there was evidence in the record to establish the $29,000 at issue represented proceeds from legitimate business ventures, the district court wrongly denied his motion to stay the summary judgment motion, and the forfeiture action was untimely. After careful review, we affirm. The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a stay, because Crossland did not identify the discovery he was lacking and how a continuance would have enabled him to obtain needed discovery. See Alexander v. Pathfinder, Inc. , 189 F.3d 735, 744 (8th Cir. 1999). We also conclude summary judgment was proper because the government presented unrebutted evidence of probable cause, and Crossland failed to create a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the money represented proceeds from a legitimate business. See United States v. Premises Known as 7725 Unity Ave. N., Brooklyn Park, Minn. , 294 F.3d 954, 958 (8th Cir. 2002). Finally, the forfeiture action was timely filed. SeeUnited States v. TwentySeven Parcels of Real Prop. Located in Sikeston, Mo. , 236 F.3d 438, 440 (8th Cir. 2001) (statute of limitations). Accordingly, we affirm. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### § 301.17 Misrepresentation of origin of furs.

No misleading nor deceptive statements as to the geographical or zoological origin of the animal producing a fur shall be used directly or indirectly in labeling, invoicing or advertising furs or fur products.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MediciNova, Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the Report), I, Shintaro Asako, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
MediciNova, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of MediciNova, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This certification has not been, and shall not be deemed,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



Date:

May 10, 2007By:

/s/    SHINTARO
ASAKOShintaro Asako Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
**EXHIBIT 31**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**
**SECTION 302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
I, Bruce Harris, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year coveredby this annual report, of Volkswagen Credit Auto Master Owner Trust, Series 2000-1;  2.  Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to beprovided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar,agreement for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;  4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer under thepooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annualcompliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports,the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and  5.  The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer’s compliancewith the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided by an independentpublic accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform SingleAttestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the poolingand servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.       March 30, 2005      /s/  Bruce Harris        Name: Bruce Harris   Title: Chief Financial Officer, VW Credit, Inc.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 20, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, December 20, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A20I0131. JUSTIN OWENS v. NOVAE, LLC.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 2017CV2229
From: Tracy, Brent [Brent.Tracy@jm.com]

Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 1:55 PM

To: Hancy, Cindy Wang

Subject: RE: JM Defiance Facility Test Report

Thank you. We would consider process weight rate to be CBI. We will review and resend a revised

public version soon.

Brent Tracy

Associate General Counsel

Environmental, Health & Safety

Johns Manville

717 17th Street

Denver, CO 80202

Direct: (303) 978

- 3268

Fax: (303) 978

- 2832

E

- mail: brent.tracy@jm.com

From: Hancy, Cindy Wang [mailto:chanc y@rti.org]

Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 11:20 AM

To: Tracy, Brent

Cc: Marinshaw, Richard; Fairchild.Susan@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: JM Defiance Facility Test Report

Brent,

We received the public version of John Manville’s Defiance BTEC test repor t for the 2603 Furnace

(Plant 2) and Line 804/Line 81 Forming/Collection and Curing Oven . While reviewing the data we found

CBI information that may have been overlooked (Process rate data on p 105 of 340). If this is indeed

CBI, could you please resend a clean public version to the EPA address below. Please feel free to

contact me if you have any questions 919.541.6623.Please mail completed non

- confidential documents to:

U.S. EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and S tandards

Sector Policies and Program Division, Metals and Minerals Group

U.S. EPA Mailroom D243

- 02

Attn: Susan Fairchild

109 T.W. Alexander Drive

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Regards,

Cindy Wang Hancy

RTI Interna tional

P.O. Box 12194

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

Phone: (919) 541

- 6623

Fax: (919) 316

- 3420