alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1502.23 Filing and service of submissions. ( a ) Submissions, including pleadings in a hearing, are to be filed with the Office of the Secretary. Two copies shall be filed. To determine compliance with filing deadlines in a hearing, a submission is considered filed on the day of filing with or mailing to the Office of the Secretary. When this part allows a response to a submission and prescribes a period of time for the filing of the response, an additional 3 days are allowed for the filing of the response if the submission is served by mail.
( b ) The person making a submission shall serve copies of it on the other participants.
( c ) Service is accomplished by mailing a submission to the address shown in the notice of participation or by personal delivery.
( d ) All submissions are to be accompanied by a certificate of service or by a statement that service is not required, stating the reason therefor.
( e ) No written submission or other portion of the administrative record may be held in confidence, except as provided in § 1502.3.
#### Clara Schneider, Appellant, v. Maxwell Schneider, Respondent.

Order unanimously modified to the extent of granting plaintiff a counsel fee of $75 and, as so modified, affirmed. No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Breitel and Bergan, JJ.
Amendment number 2 between Kurt D.Kost and Foundation Coal Corporation



 EXHIBIT 10.2 
 Amendment Number 2 to 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 Kurt D. Kost

 THIS AMENDMENT, is made effective as of June 18, 2007, by and between Foundation Coal Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”) and (“Executive”). 
 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive previously entered into an Amended and
Restated Employment Agreement, dated March 13, 2006 (the “Employment Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Company and
Executive previously entered into Amendment Number 1, dated January 3, 2007, to the Employment Agreement (the “Amendment Number 1”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors (“Nominating Committee”) has developed a Chief Executive Officer (the “CEO”) development plan for
the development of a succession candidate for the position of CEO; and 
 WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of
the Company (“Compensation Committee”) has sought the services of its independent compensation consultant regarding the appropriate executive compensation package for the CEO succession candidate; and 
 WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee has reviewed the information provided by its independent compensation consultant and has determined it would be in
the best interest of the Company and its Stockholders to further amend the Employment Agreement to revise the title and base salary of the Executive. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows: 
 Section 2. Position. The Position of Executive is revised to reflect Executive shall serve as the Company’s Executive Vice President.

 Section 3. Base Salary. During the Employment Term, the Company shall pay Executive a base salary at the annual rate of
$350,000. 
 Except as otherwise noted in this Amendment Number 2, all other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement remain as originally written.
In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of this Amendment Number 2 and the terms of the Employment Agreement, the terms of this Amendment Number 2 shall be controlling. 
  

 1 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Agreement as of the day and year first
above written. 
  

					
	FOUNDATION COAL CORPORATION	 	KURT D. KOST
			
		 	 /s/ Michael R. Peelish
	 	 /s/ Kurt D. Kost

	 By:
	 	Michael R. Peelish	 	
	 Title:
	 	SVP Safety and Human Resources	 	

  

 2
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 25 (Friday, February 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 5863]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2613]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-53,890]


Arrow Terminals, Allquipps, PA; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on December 29, 2004, in response to a 
petition filed by the United Steelworkers of America on behalf of 
workers at Arrow Terminals, Allquippa, Pennsylvania.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th day of January, 2004.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-2613 Filed 2-5-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
### **CHAPTER 41—DEMONSTRATION CITIES AND METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—COMPREHENSIVE CITY DEMONSTRATION PROGRAMS

Sec.
3301 to 3313. Omitted.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—PLANNED AREAWIDE DEVELOPMENT

3331.
Congressional findings and declaration of purpose.
3332.
Cooperation between Federal agencies.
3333.
Metropolitan expediters.
3334.
Coordination of Federal aids with local governments.
3335.
Grants to assist in planned areawide development.
3336.
Amount of grant.
3337.
Consultations and certifications.
3338.
Definitions.
3339.
Limitation on amount of grant.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—URBAN INFORMATION AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE SERVICES

3351 to 3356. Omitted.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

3371.
Assistance for housing in Alaska.
3372, 3373. Repealed.
3374.
Acquisition of property at or near military bases which have been ordered to be closed and certain property owned by members of the Armed Forces, Department of Defense and United States Coast Guard civilian employees, and surviving spouses.
#### § 300.21 Marking of samples, swatches or specimens.

Where samples, swatches or specimens of wool products subject to the act were used to promote or effect sales of such wool products in commerce, said samples, swatches and specimens, as well as the products themselves, shall be labeled or marked to show their respective fiber contents and other information required by law.

[6 FR 3426, July 15, 1941. Redesignated at 63 FR 7517, Feb. 13, 1998]
Amendment No. 1 to Zions Bancorporation 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.1 
  
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 TO 

ZIONS BANCORPORATION 
 2005 STOCK
OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN 
  
 Amendment, effective as of
May 8, 2007, to the Zions Bancorporation (the “Company”) 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). 
  
 WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors desires to amend Section 2.13 of the Plan modify the number of shares of the
Company’s common stock purchasable under options granted to directors annually; and 
  
 WHEREAS, Section 2.13(b) of the Plan authorizes the Compensation Committee to modify the number of shares purchasable under options granted to directors in its discretion; 
  
 NOW THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Section 2.13(b) of the Plan shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows: 

  


	 	2.13	Director Stock Options 

  
 (b) Grant of director stock options. Until and unless the Committee in its discretion determines otherwise, pursuant to this
section 2.13 (i) on the first business day after the date the Plan is approved by the Company’s shareholders, each Non-Employee Director shall automatically be granted stock options to purchase four thousand (4,000) shares of Common
Stock, (ii) on the first business day following the annual meeting of the shareholders of the Company in 2006 and 2007, each Non-Employee Director shall automatically be granted stock options to purchase four thousand (4,000) shares of
Common Stock, and (iii) on the first business day following the annual meeting of the shareholders of the Company in each year thereafter, each Non-Employee Director shall automatically be granted stock options to purchase a number of shares of
Common Stock equal to $70,000 divided by the per option expense expected by the Company on such date to be recorded by it for the grant of such options in its financial reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, rounded to the
nearest 100 (the “Determined Amount”). If the number of shares then remaining available for the grant of stock options under the Plan is not sufficient for each Non-Employee Director to be granted a stock option for four thousand
(4,000) shares or the Determined Amount of shares, as the case may be, then each Non-Employee Director shall be granted a stock option for a whole number of shares equal to the number of shares then remaining available divided by the number of
Non-Employee Directors, disregarding any fractional shares. 
  

	 	2.	The Plan, as amended by paragraph 1 of this Amendment, shall remain in full force and affect. 








 AS ADOPTED BY THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY ON MAY 4, 2007.

  

	
	/S/ THOMAS E. LAURSEN
	Thomas E. Laursen
	Secretary of the Company
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard J. Maiello, Appellant.

[819 NYS2d 483]

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Grosso, J.), dated July 18, 2005, which, pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant did not demonstrate circumstances which would warrant a departure from the presumptive level three risk level assigned to him under the risk assessment instrument (see *People v Guaman,*8 AD3d 545 [2004]). The defendant’s evidence, while demonstrating that he had made efforts toward rehabilitation and treatment, was conclusory and unsubstantiated. Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in designating the defendant a level three sex offender. Schmidt, J.P., Crane, Krausman, Skelos and Lunn, JJ., concur.
§ 700.55 Requests for determination that program within the United States is necessary or appropriate to promote the national defense. ( a ) *Homeland security, emergency response, and critical infrastructure protection and restoration assistance programs within the United States.* Any person requesting priority rating authority or requiring assistance in obtaining rated items under this part supporting homeland security, emergency preparedness, and critical infrastructure protection and restoration related activities should submit a request for a determination in writing that the request supports a program that is necessary or appropriate to promote the national defense (referred to as “approved program”) to the Office of Policy and Program Analysis, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472; Telephone: (202) 212-2900; Fax: (202) 646-4601; Email: *FEMA-DPA@fema.dhs.gov ,* website: *https://www.fema.gov/disaster/defense-production-act .*
( b ) *Military production and construction, military use of civil transportation, stockpiles managed by the Department of Defense, space, and directly related activities within the United States.* Any person requesting priority rating authority or requiring assistance under this part in obtaining rated items supporting military production and construction, military use of civil transportation, stockpiles managed by the Department of Defense, space, and directly related activities should submit a request for a determination in writing that the request supports a program that is necessary or appropriate to promote the national defense (referred to as “approved program”) to the Department of Defense DPA Title I Lead in the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Industrial Base Policy, 3330 Defense Pentagon, Room 3B854, Washington, DC 20301; Telephone: (703) 697-0051; Fax: (703) 695-4885; Email: *osd.pentagon.ousd-a-s.mbx.indpol-dpa-title-i@mail.mil ;* website: *https://www.businessdefense.gov/ .*
( c ) *Energy production and construction, distribution and use, and directly related activities within the United States.* Any person requesting priority rating authority or requiring assistance under this part in obtaining rated items supporting energy production and construction, distribution and use, and directly related activities should submit a request for a determination in writing that the request supports a program that is necessary or appropriate to promote the national defense (referred to as “approved program”) to the Department of Energy, Office of Cybersecurity, Energy Security, and Emergency Response, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585; Telephone: (202) 586-8100; Email: *askcr@hq.doe.gov .*
[89 FR 58974, July 22, 2024]
§ 5.62 Hearing rights of respondent. In any hearing under this subpart, the respondent shall have the right: ( a ) To be represented by counsel;
( b ) To present and cross-examine witnesses and submit evidence;
( c ) To present objections, motions, and arguments, oral or written; and
( d ) To obtain a transcript of the proceedings on request.
NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC WORKSHOP IN HOUSTON AUG. 11-12

ON MEDICAL EVENT DEFINITION AND OTHER RULE CHANGES

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a public workshop in Houston on Aug. 11-12 

to discuss possible changes to the definition of “medical events,” as well as other potential revisions 

of NRC regulations on the medical uses of radioactive materials.

The workshop will be held at the Houston Marriott at the Texas Medical Center, 6580 

Fannin St., from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. each day. A similar workshop was held June 20-21 in New 

York City.

The workshop follows Commission direction to the staff to work with the NRC’s Advisory 

Committee on the Medical Uses of Isotopes as well as the medical community to develop event 

definitions that will protect the interests of patients and allow doctors flexibility to take actions they 

deem medically necessary. The definitions should also preserve the NRC’s ability to detect 

misapplications of radioactive material and failures in process, procedure and training.

The workshop will also discuss the definition of medical events specifically associated with 

permanent implant brachytherapy, naming associate radiation safety officers on licenses, and other 

potential revisions to NRC’s medical regulations in 10 CFR Part 35.

More information on the workshops, including agendas and registration, is available online.

###

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should contact 

the Office of Public Affairs beforehand.

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC’s website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-143 August 2, 2011
§ 1221.2 Requirements for play yards. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each play yard must comply with all applicable provisions of ASTM F406-19, *Standard Consumer Safety Specification for Non-Full-Size Baby Cribs/Play Yards,* approved on March 15, 2019. The Director of the Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. You may obtain a copy of this ASTM standard from ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959; *www.astm.org .* You may inspect a copy at the Division of the Secretariat, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Room 820, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, telephone 301-504-7923, or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, email *fedreg.legal@nara.gov ,* or go to: *www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html .*
( b ) Comply with the ASTM F406-19 standard with the following exclusions: ( 1 ) Do not comply with section 5.17 of ASTM F406-19.
( 2 ) Do not comply with section 5.20 of ASTM F406-19.
( 3 ) Do not comply with section 6, *Performance Requirements for Rigid Sided Products,* of ASTM F406-19.
( 4 ) Do not comply with sections 8.1 through 8.10.5 of ASTM F406-19.
( 5 ) Instead of complying with section 9.4.2.10 of ASTM F406-19, comply only with the following: ( i ) 9.4.2.10 For products that have a separate mattress that is not permanently fixed in place: Use ONLY mattress/pad provided by manufacturer.
( ii ) [Reserved]
( 6 ) Do not comply with section 10.1.1.1 of ASTM F406-19.
[84 FR 56689, Oct. 23, 2019]
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS
N O . A P - 75, 941

EX PA R TE LA R R Y K A R N ES , A ppl i c ant

ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A W RI T OF HABE AS CORP US CAU S E NO. 0 8 2 0 6 4 3 D I N THE CRI M I NAL DI S TRI CT CO URT

NUM BER ON E FROM TARRA NT CO UNTY

P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Crim i n al P ro ce dure, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habe as cor

pus. Ex pa rte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of robber y causing bo dil y inj ur y and se nte nc e d to fi ft

y -f ive y e ars ’ i mpr is on men t. Th e Se c on d Court of Ap pe a ls aff irmed his conviction. Kar ne s v . S tate , 127 S.W .3d 184 (Tex. A pp.–Ft. Worth, 2003) . Applicant contends that his appellate counsel re ndere d ineffe ctive assistanc e bec ause c ounsel failed to f ile a timely petition for discre tionary revie w af ter a dvising Applica

nt that he would do so.Appellate c ounsel filed an a ffidavit with the trial c ourt. Ba sed on that af fidavit, the trial cour

t has enter ed finding s of fac t and conc lusions of law that appe llate counse l failed to file a petition for discretionar

y revie w af ter advising Applicant that he would do so. The tr ial court re commends that relief be g rante d. Ex parte W

ilson , 956 S.W .2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find, theref ore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of

-time petition for discre tionary revie w of the judgme nt of the Second Court of Appeals in Cause No. 02-02-223- CR that aff irmed his conviction in C a se No
. 08 20 64 3D from th e Cr imi na l D ist ri c t Co ur t N umb e r O ne of Ta

rr ant Cou nty , T e xas. Ap pli c ant s ha ll f

ile his pe tit ion

fo r d isc re tio na

ry re vie w w iththe Se c on d Court of Ap peal s w ith in 30 day s of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues. Applicant’s r emainingclaims are dismiss ed. Ex Parte Torres , 9 43 S.W. 2d 46 9 (T e x. Cr im. App. 1997).

Deliver ed: J une 18, 2008 Do no t pu bli sh
#### § 6.102 Application.

This part applies to all programs or activities conducted by the Commission except for programs or activities conducted outside the United States that do not involve individuals with handicaps in the United States.
#### § 1115.7 Relation to other provisions.

The reporting requirements of section 37 of the CPSA (15 U.S.C. 2084) are in addition to the requirement in section 15 of the CPSA. Section 37 requires a product manufacturer to report certain kinds of lawsuit information. It is intended as a supplement to, not a substitute for, the requirements of section 15(b) of the CPSA. Whether or not a firm has an obligation to provide information under section 37, it must consider whether it has obtained information which reasonably supports the conclusion that its product violates a consumer product safety rule, does not comply with a voluntary safety standard upon which the Commission has relied under section 9, contains a defect which could create a substantial product hazard, or creates an unreasonable risk of serious injury or death. If a firm has obtained such information, it must report under section 15(b) of the CPSA, whether or not it is required to report under section 37. Further, in many cases the Commission would expect to receive reports under section 15(b) long before the obligation to report under section 37 arises since firms have frequently obtained reportable information before settlements or judgments in their product liability lawsuits.

[57 FR 34229, Aug. 4, 1992]
###### Editorial Note on Part 922

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

#### § 922.221 Definitions.

The following terms are defined for purposes of this subpart U:

*Sanctuary resource* means all historical resources as defined at 15 CFR 922.11, which includes any pre-contact and historic sites, structures, districts, objects, and shipwreck sites within sanctuary boundaries.

*Shipwreck site* means all archaeological and material remains associated with sunken watercraft or aircraft that are historical resources, including associated components, cargo, contents, artifacts, or debris fields that may be exposed or buried within the lake bed.

*Tethered underwater mobile system* means remotely operated vehicles and other systems with onboard propulsion systems that utilize a tether connected to a station-holding (e.g.byanchor, dynamic positioning, or manual vessel operation) surface support vessel.
No: IV-15-001 January 5, 2015 

CONTACT: Lara Uselding 817- 200-1519

 Victor Dricks 817- 200-1128

 

NRC Names New Resident Inspector at

Fort Calhoun Station

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Arlington, Texas, 

have selected Brian Cummings as the new Resident Inspector at the 

Fort Calhoun Station located north of Omaha, Neb. 

“Brian Cummings’ technical expertise will assist the NRC in 

carrying out its mission to protect people and the environment by 

ensuring the safe operation of Fort Calhoun Station,” said NRC Region 

IV Administrator Marc Dapas.

Cummings joined the Region IV office in February 2014 as a 

project engineer in the Division of Reactor Projects. Prior to the NRC, he was an officer in the U.S. Navy. 

Cummings was an assistant professor at the U.S. Naval Academy and also served as ship’s engineer 

officer of the submarine USS Bremerton. He earned a bachelor’s degree in chemistry from the Naval 

Academy and a master’s in chemistry from the University of Maryland. 

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant site has at least two NRC Resident Inspectors. 

Cummings joins Senior Resident Inspector Max Schneider. They serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the 

facility, conducting inspections, monitoring significant work projects, and interacting with plant workers 

and the public. 

The Fort Calhoun Station Resident Inspectors can be reached at 402-426-9611.