alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §10305. Development of water-related technology

#### (a) Grants; matching funds

(1) The Secretary shall make grants in addition to those authorized under sections 10303 and 10304 of this title for technology development concerning any aspect of water resources including water-related technology which the Secretary may deem to be of State, regional, or national importance. Activities funded under this section may be carried out by educational institutions, private firms, foundations, individuals, or agencies of State or local government. Care shall be taken to protect proprietary information of private individuals or firms associated with the technology.

(2) The Secretary may establish any condition for the matching of funds by the recipient of any grant or contract under this section which the Secretary considers to be in the best interest of the Nation considering the information transfer and technology needs of the Nation. However, in the case of institutes established by section 10303 of this title no match greater than that required under section 10303 of this title may be required.

#### (b) Applications for grants

Each application for a grant under this section shall state the nature of the project to be undertaken, the qualifications of the personnel who will direct and conduct it, facilities of the organization performing any technology development, the importance of the project to the Nation, region, and State concerned, and the potential benefit to be accrued.

#### (c) Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary the sum of $6,000,000 for the purpose of carrying out this section for each of the fiscal years ending September 30, 1990, through September 30, 1995; such sums to remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 98–242, title I, §106, Mar. 22, 1984, 98 Stat. 100; Pub. L. 101–397, §1(n), Sept. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 853.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1990—Pub. L. 101–397, in amending section generally, in subsec. (a)(1) struck out provision directing that grant be made on basis of merit and feasibility of project, in subsec. (a)(2) inserted provisions relating to match in the case of institutes established by section 10303 of this title, and in subsec. (c) substituted provisions authorizing $6,000,000 appropriation for fiscal years 1990 through 1995, for provisions authorizing the same sum for fiscal years 1985 through 1989, and struck out provisions authorizing obligation of funds under this section and par. (1) and (2) designations.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE, ACCOUNTING AND

FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of New Pacific Ventures, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2006, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I Gerry Jardine, President of the Company, hereby certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1)  the Report fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

   (2)  the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/Gerry JardineGerry JardinePresident/DirectorSeptember 14, 2006
#### § 436.11 Severability.

If any provision of this part is stayed or held invalid, the remainder will stay in force.
### §13864. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 13864 was editorially reclassified as section 12224 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
Skip Navigation

#         Archive-It      

Login

      - HOME
      - EXPLORE
      - LEARN MORE
      - CONTACT US

### The leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing cultural heritage on the web 

Built at the Internet Archive

        - Explore
        - Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive
        - Federal Select Agent Program

#  Federal Select Agent Program 

**Collected by:** Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive 

**Archived since:**May, 2019

**Description:**
The Federal Select Agent Program (FSAP) regulates the possession, use, and transfer of biological select agents and toxins that have the potential to pose a severe threat to public, animal or plant health, or to animal or plant products. Common examples of select agents and toxins include the organisms that cause anthrax, smallpox, and bubonic plague, as well as the toxin ricin.  While potentially dangerous, work with select agents and toxins provides important scientific discoveries that have led to improved detection, prevention, diagnostic, and treatment options for diseases considered to be some of the most threatening to public, animal, and plant health. FSAP allows laboratories to conduct lifesaving research on these potentially dangerous materials while making sure it is done as safely and securely as possible.

**Subject:**    	    Government - US Federal,     	    Science & Technology,     	    Health & Medicine

**Language:**    	    English

**Collector:**    	    U.S. Government Publishing Office

**Contributor:**    	    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,     	    U.S. Department of Agriculture

## Narrow Your Results

### 

            There are no further ways to narrow your results.           

Sites for this collection are listed below. Narrow your results at left, or enter a search query below to		      find a site, specific URL or to search the text of archived webpages.
Clear

              - Sites
              - Search Page Text

Page 1 of 1  (1 Total Results)

**Sort By:**
                - Title (A-Z)
                - Title (Z-A)
                - URL (A-Z)
                - URL (Z-A)

### URL:     https://www.selectagents.gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

Page 1 of 1  (1 Total Results)

Archive It

#### Archive-It 

*Built at the Internet Archive*
2014 Archive-ItThe leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing  cultural heritage on the web 

      - Home
      - Learn More         - About Archive-It
        - News/Press
        - Meet the Team
        - Publications
      - Contact Us
No: II-16-016 April 5, 2016

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416

NRC Schedules Open House to Discuss Agency’s

2015 Assessment of Farley Nuclear Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled an open house for Tuesday, April 12, to 

provide information on the agency’s assessment of the Farley nuclear plant in 2015. 

The plant, operated by Southern Nuclear Operating Co., is located near Columbia, Ala., about 18 

miles east of Dothan.

The open house, which will include informational posters, is scheduled from 3 - 5 p.m. in the

Houston County Administration Building, 462 North Oates St., in Dothan.

NRC resident inspectors and other staff members will be available to answer questions on the 

safety performance and regulatory oversight of the Farley plant, as well as highlights of NRC 

inspections. 

“We invite the public to visit with us and find out what we’re doing to ensure Farley and other 

nuclear plants are operated safely,” said NRC Region II Administrator Cathy Haney. “These annual 

meetings offer an opportunity for everyone, and especially people who live near the plant, to learn 

about our inspection and oversight programs.”

An NRC assessment letter to plant officials addressing the 2015 Farley plant performance will 

serve as the main focus of the open house, but NRC staff members will be available to answer other 

questions about the NRC role at the plant.

The NRC review of the Farley plant for 2015 concluded that it operated in a manner that 

preserved public health and safety and protected the environment. Because of that performance, Farley 

will continue to receive the detailed routine or baseline inspections this year that all nuclear power 

plants receive.

The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess plant 

performance. The colors start with green, which has very low safety significance, and then progress to 

white, yellow or red, based on the significance of the issues. All inspection findings and performance 

indicators for Farley were green in 2015.

Current performance information for both Farley Unit 1 and Unit 2, as well as more detailed 

information about NRC inspection and oversight is available on the NRC website. Specific plant 

performance indicators and inspection reports are updated at least quarterly.
### SUBCHAPTER XVII—[Repealed]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 108–136, div. C, title XXXI, §3141(m)(1), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1787, struck out heading for subchapter XVII "Department of Energy National Security Authorizations General Provisions".
No: IV-15-016 June 18, 2015

CONTACT: Victor Dricks (817) 200-1128

Lara Uselding (817) 100-1519

NRC to Conduct Open House on June 24 in New Strawn, Kan., to 

Discuss 2014 Safety Performance of Wolf Creek

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a public open house on June 24, in New Strawn, 

Kan., to discuss the agency’s annual review of safety performance at the Wolf Creek nuclear power 

plant. The plant is located near Burlington, Kan., and operated by Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating

Corporation. 

NRC staff will be on hand from 6 to 8 p.m. at the New Strawn Community Center at 319 West 

Getz in New Strawn. The open house will provide an opportunity for the public to ask about NRC’s 

assessment of the plant’s performance in 2014 and the agency’s oversight plans for 2015. Among the 

NRC staff in attendance will be the Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant on a full-time basis. 

Under the NRC’s Reactor Oversight Process, the agency gauges plant performance through the 

use of color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators, which are statistical measurements 

of plant performance that can trigger additional oversight if exceeded. Overall, the plant operated safely 

in 2014 and the plant is currently under the NRC’s normal level of oversight. 

“By assessing each plant’s performance in a comprehensive manner, we are able to focus our 

inspection resources on those areas most in need of attention,” NRC Region IV Administrator Marc 

Dapas said. “Because Wolf Creek did not have any safety or security issues rising above very low 

significance in 2014, we are not currently planning any inspections above and beyond our normal 

reviews.” 

The NRC’s normal level of oversight at each U.S. nuclear power plant involves thousands of 

hours of inspection. In 2014, the agency devoted about 6,118 hours of inspection and review at Wolf 

Creek.

A letter sent from the NRC Region IV office to plant officials addresses the performance of the 

plant during 2014.
§ 10.33 Intervention as a party. ( a ) *Petition for Leave to Intervene.* Any person whose interests may be affected substantially by the matters to be considered in a proceeding may petition the Administrative Law Judge for leave to intervene as a party in the proceeding any time after the institution of a proceeding and before such proceeding has been submitted for final consideration. Petitions for leave to intervene shall be in writing and shall set forth with specificity the nature of the petitioner's interest in the proceeding and the manner in which his interests may be affected substantially. The Administrative Law Judge may direct a petitioner requesting intervention to submit himself for examination as to his interest in the proceeding.
( b ) *Response to petition.* A petition for leave to intervene shall be served by the petitioner upon all parties to the proceeding, who may support or oppose the petition in a document filed within ten days after service of the petition upon them or within such other period as the Administrative Law Judge may direct in a particular case.
( c ) *Leave to intervene—when granted.* No person shall be admitted as a party to a proceeding by intervention unless the Administrative Law Judge is satisfied that ( 1 ) a substantial interest of the person seeking to intervene may be adversely affected by the matter to be considered in the proceeding;
( 2 ) that his intervention will not materially prejudice the rights of any party, through delay or otherwise;
( 3 ) that his participation as a party will otherwise be consistent with the public interest; and
( 4 ) that leave to be heard pursuant to § 10.34 would be inadequate for the protection of his interests. The burden shall be upon the petitioner to satisfy the Administrative Law Judge on these issues.
( d ) *Rights of intervenor.* A person who has been granted leave to intervene shall from that time forward have all the rights and responsibilities of a party to the proceeding.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3689 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3689

 To authorize the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency 
 to waive any emission standard or other requirement under section 112 
  of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7412) applicable to the control of 
   asbestos emissions in the demolition or renovation of a condemned 
  building for which there is a reasonable expectation of structural 
                                failure.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 15, 2011

  Mr. Owens introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency 
 to waive any emission standard or other requirement under section 112 
  of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7412) applicable to the control of 
   asbestos emissions in the demolition or renovation of a condemned 
  building for which there is a reasonable expectation of structural 
                                failure.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Common Sense Waiver Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. WAIVER FROM ASBESTOS NESHAP REQUIREMENTS FOR DEMOLITION OR 
              RENOVATION OF CONDEMNED BUILDINGS.

    (a) Waiver.--At the request of a State or local government, the 
Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (in this section 
referred to as the ``Administrator'') may waive any emission standard 
or other requirement under section 112 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 
7412) applicable to the control of asbestos emissions in the demolition 
or renovation of a building.
    (b) Standard for Approval.--The Administrator may approve a request 
for a waiver under subsection (a) only if the request demonstrates 
that--
            (1) the building has been condemned; and
            (2) there is a reasonable expectation of the building's 
        structural failure.
    (c) Time Period for Approval or Disapproval of Request for 
Waiver.--The Administrator shall approve or disapprove a request for a 
waiver under subsection (a) within 90 days after the date on which the 
request is received by the Administrator. If the Administrator fails to 
approve or disapprove such a request by the end of such 90-day period, 
the request is deemed to be approved.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3870 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3870

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 6083 Highway 36 West in Rose Bud, Arkansas, as the ``Nicky `Nick' 
                      Daniel Bacon Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NICKY ``NICK'' DANIEL BACON POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 6083 Highway 36 West in Rose Bud, Arkansas, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Nicky `Nick' Daniel Bacon Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Nicky 
`Nick' Daniel Bacon Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 23, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3870

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 6083 Highway 36 West in Rose Bud, Arkansas, as the ``Nicky `Nick' 
                      Daniel Bacon Post Office''.
```
** **

**EXHIBIT 12.1**

 

**ARDEN REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OFEARNINGS TO FIXED**

**CHARGES**

**(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS)**

 
|                                            |   | **ARDEN REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP** |    |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|---------|
|                                            |   |                                 |    |
|                                            |   | **For the Years Ended December 31,** |    |
|                                            |   | **2001**                             |    | **2000** |   | **1999** |   | **1998** |   | **1997** | ** ** |
|                                            |   |                                 |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Earnings Available to Cover Fixed Charges:      |   |                                 |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Income before extraordinary items               |   | $                                    | 106,257 |   | $ | 105,209 |   | $ | 102,393 |   | $ | 95,794 |   | $ | 44,286 |   |
|                                            |   |                                 |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Add: Interest Expense                           |   | 84,195                               |    | 78,406 |   | 60,239 |   | 43,403 |   | 19,511 |   |
|                                            |   |                                 |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Total Earnings Available to Cover Fixed Charges |   | $                                    | 190,452 |   | $ | 183,615 |   | $ | 162,632 |   | $ | 139,197 |   | $ | 63,797 |   |
|                                            |   |                                 |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Fixed Charges:                                  |   |                                 |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest Expense                                |   | $                                    | 84,195  |   | $ | 78,406 |   | $ | 60,239 |   | $ | 43,403 |   | $ | 19,511 |   |
| Interest Capitalized                            |   | 9,095                                |    | 12,646 |   | 9,587 |   | 8,920 |   | 1,178 |   |
| Preferred Distributions                         |   | 4,312                                |    | 4,312 |   | 1,354 |   | — |   | — |   |
|                                            |   |                                 |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Total Fixed Charges                             |   | $                                    | 97,602  |   | $ | 95,364 |   | $ | 71,180 |   | $ | 52,323 |   | $ | 20,689 |   |
|                                            |   |                                 |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges              |   | 1.95                                 | x  | 1.93 | x | 2.28 | x  | 2.66 | x  | 3.08 | x  |

 

----
### §14044e. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 14044e was editorially reclassified as section 20707 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
### §11334. Records and audit of National Board and recipients of assistance

#### (a) Annual independent audit of National Board

(1) The accounts of the National Board shall be audited annually in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards by independent certified public accountants or independent licensed public accountants certified or licensed by a regulatory authority of a State or other political subdivision of the United States. The audits shall be conducted at the place or places where the accounts of the National Board are normally kept. All books, accounts, financial records, reports, files, and all other papers, things, or property belonging to or in use by the National Board and necessary to facilitate the audits shall be made available to the person or persons conducting the audits, and full facilities for verifying transactions with any assets held by depositories, fiscal agents, and custodians shall be afforded to such person or persons.

(2) The report of each such independent audit shall be included in the annual report required in section 11335 of this title. Such report shall set forth the scope of the audit and include such statements as are necessary to present fairly the assets and liabilities of the National Board, surplus or deficit, with an analysis of the changes during the year, supplemented in reasonable detail by a statement of the income and expenses of the National Board during the year, and a statement of the application of funds, together with the opinion of the independent auditor of such statements.

#### (b) Access to records of recipients of assistance

(1) Each recipient of assistance under this subchapter shall keep such records as may be reasonably necessary to fully disclose the amount and the disposition by such recipient of the proceeds of such assistance, the total cost of the project or undertaking in connection with which such assistance is given or used, and the amount and nature of that portion of the cost of the project or undertaking supplied by other sources, and such other records as will facilitate an effective audit.

(2) The National Board, or any of its duly authorized representatives, shall have access for the purpose of audit and examination to any books, documents, papers, and records of the recipient that are pertinent to assistance received under this subchapter.

#### (c) Authority of Comptroller General

The Comptroller General of the United States, or any of the duly authorized representatives of the Comptroller General, shall also have access to any books, documents, papers, and records of the National Board and recipients for such purpose.

(Pub. L. 100–77, title III, §304, July 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 491.)
### §1397m–5. Rule of construction

Nothing in this division shall be construed as—

(1) limiting any cause of action or other relief related to obligations under this division that is available under the law of any State, or political subdivision thereof; or

(2) creating a private cause of action for a violation of this division.

(Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XX, §2046, as added Pub. L. 111–148, title VI, §6703(a)(1)(C), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 798.)