alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ARC Corporate Realty Trust, Inc.® (ACRT) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce Nelson, Chief Financial Officer of ACRT, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of ACRT.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Bruce Nelson       
|Bruce Nelson           
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 14, 2006      



29
March 24, 2015

MEMORANDUM TO: Mark A. Satorius

Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS – SECY-14-0147 – CYBER SECURITY 

FOR FUEL CYCLE FACILITIES

The Commission has disapproved the staff’s recommendation (Option 1) to issue a security 

order to fuel cycle facilities followed by rulemaking, and approved (Option 2) initiation of a cyber 

security rulemaking for fuel cycle facilities. The rulemaking should be designated as a high 

priority and the final rule should be completed and implemented in an expeditious manner.

The staff should augment the work performed to date to develop the technical basis and interact 

with the stakeholders in developing the proposed and final rule. In developing a more fulsome

technical basis the staff should ensure an adequate, integrated look at cyber security as only 

one aspect of site security (for example, site access controls provide an element of digital asset 

protection) and take the requisite care to avoid unintended adverse consequences to safety

based on a stand-alone focus on cyber security. The technical basis should address the need 

to integrate the regulatory consideration of safety and security and the necessity to apply a 

disciplined, graded approach to the identification of digital assets and a graded, consequencebased approach to their protection. 

During the rulemaking process, the staff should monitor licensee implementation of any

"voluntary" cybersecurity measures undertaken by fuel cycle facilities.

With respect to the staff's estimate of a three year implementation period subsequent to 

approval of a final rule, the staff should consider a shorter period such as 18 months.

cc: Chairman Burns

Commissioner Svinicki 

Commissioner Ostendorff 

Commissioner Baran

OGC

CFO

OCA
EXHIBIT 32

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         The undersigned  executive officers of the Registrant hereby certify to
the best of their  knowledge that this  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the
quarter  ended  September  30,  2006  (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
and the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



Date: November 14, 2006             By: /s/ William M. Tandy
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Name: William M. Tandy
                                        Title:Chief Executive Officer




Date: November 14, 2006             By: /s/ Michael D. Wortham
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Name: Michael D. Wortham
                                        Title:Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of SENSOR SYSTEM SOLUTIONS, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I,
Michael Young, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

Dated this 27th day of March, 2006.



                                               By: /s/Michael Young
                                               ----------------------------
                                               Michael Young
                                               Chief Executive Officer and
                                               Principal Accounting Officer
§ 295.9 Protection of confidential information. As required by section 278n(d)(5) of title 15 of the United States Code, the following information obtained by the Secretary on a confidential basis in connection with the activities of any business or joint research and development venture receiving funding under the program shall be exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act— ( 1 ) Information on the business operation of any member of the business or joint venture;
( 2 ) Trade secrets possessed by any business or any member of the joint venture.
[55 FR 30145, July 24, 1990. Redesignated at 59 FR 667, Jan. 6, 1994]
Exhibit 10.13


On
April 25, 2007, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Sally
Beauty Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), authorized and
approved a cash payment to John H. Golliher, President of Beauty Systems Group
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and an indirect wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company, in connection with the relocation of his employment
by the Company from California to Texas. 
The approved cash payment is in the amount of approximately $172,000,
$125,000 of which represents a portion of the diminution in the value of the
equity in Mr. Golliher’s former home in California from the date that an
appraisal of such home was conducted in connection with the relocation and the
date on which such home was ultimately sold, and the remainder of which
represents the approximate amount of taxes that Mr. Golliher will be required
to pay with respect to the $125,000 payment.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eddie Torres, Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 207]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Peter J. Benitez, J.), rendered June 27, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the second degree, and sentencing him to time served and five years’ probation, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility. Defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the element of intent to cause physical injury (Penal Law § 120.05 [2]) is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the requisite intent could be readily inferred from defendant’s actions.

The prosecutor’s summation did not deprive defendant of a fair trial. The only summation claim that defendant has even arguably preserved is his challenge to the prosecutor’s comment on the meaning of a plea of not guilty. The remark in question was not prejudicial, and any prejudice was cured by the court’s curative instruction *(see People v Santiago,*52 NY2d 865 [1981]). Defendant’s remaining summation claims are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them *(see People v Overlee,*236 AD2d 133 [1997], *lv denied*91 NY2d 976 [1998]; *People v D Alessandro,*184 AD2d 114, 118-119 [1992], *lv denied*81 NY2d 884 [1993]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Nardelli and McGuire, JJ.
#### § 1.20 Alternative procedures.

If the Commission determines at the commencement of a rulemaking proceeding to employ procedures other than those established in this subpart, it may do so by announcing those procedures in the Federal Register notice commencing the rulemaking proceeding.

[86 FR 38551, July 22, 2021]
### §13710. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 13710 was editorially reclassified as section 12110 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
exv10w26



 






	 	 	 	 	 



Exhibit 10.26




2007 Executive Bonus Plan



The following is a description of the CEVA, Inc. (“CEVA”) 2007 Executive Bonus Plan for the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (the “2007 Bonus Plan”) provided pursuant to
Paragraph 10(iii) to Item 601 of Regulation S-K, which requires a written description of a
compensatory plan when no formal document contains the compensation information.



The 2007 Bonus Plan is effective for fiscal year 2007. The purpose of the 2007 Bonus Plan is to
promote the interests of CEVA and its stockholders by providing the Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer with financial rewards upon achievement of specified business objectives.



Fifty percent of the bonus payable to each of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer will be paid only if both the 2007 revenue and operating income goals, based on CEVA’s
internal 2007 budget, are achieved. The other fifty percent of the bonus payable to each of the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer is payable at the discretion of the
Compensation Committee. The bonus payable to the Chief Executive Officer is capped at fifty
percent of his base salary for 2007. The bonus payable to the Chief Financial Officer is capped at
thirty five percent of his base salary for 2007.



Payment of bonuses (if any) is normally made during the first quarter of the following year and
normally will be paid in cash in a single lump sum, subject to payroll taxes and tax withholdings.
#### § 1021.8 Legislative proposals.

Draft EISs on legislative proposals which may significantly affect the environment shall be prepared as described in § 1506.8 of the NEPA regulations. The draft EIS, where feasible, shall accompany the legislative proposal or report to Congress and shall be available in time for Congressional hearings and deliberations. The draft EIS shall be forwarded to the Environmental Protection Agency in accordance with § 1506.9 of the NEPA regulations. Comments on the legislative statement and CPSC's responses shall be forwarded to the appropriate Congressional committees.
**Exhibit32**

****

**CERTIFICATION**

In connection with the periodicreport of The Clorox Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the "Report"), we, Gerald E. Johnston, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, and Daniel J. Heinrich, ChiefFinancial Officer****of the Company, hereby certify as of thedate hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of ourknowledge:

(1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company at the dates and for the periodsindicated. 

A signed original ofthis written statement required by Section 906 has been provided tothe Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

This Certification has not been, andshall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities andExchange Commission.

Date: November 4, 2004.

/s/ Gerald E.Johnston         

Gerald E. Johnston

President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer

/s/ Daniel J.Heinrich

Daniel J. Heinrich

Vice President – ChiefFinancial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10709 Conference Calendar

ERIC DESHUN WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE; DALLAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:97-CV-1041-X

- - - - - - - - - - October 30, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Eric Deshun Williams (TDCJ #777518) appeals the dismissal as frivolous of his pro se and in forma pauperis (IFP) civil rights complaint. Williams argued in the complaint that his constitutional rights were violated when he “illegally” was transferred to TDCJ custody while his direct appeal was still pending.No. 97-10709 -2- We have reviewed the record and Williams’s brief and find no reversible error relating to Williams’s illegal-transfer claim. Accordingly, we AFFIRM for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge and adopted by the district court. Williams v. Dallas County District Attorney’s Office, et al. , No. 3-97-CV-1041-X (N.D. Tex., June 17, 1997). Insofar as Williams’s complaint raised any additional issues, Williams has abandoned them by failing to assert them on appeal. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner , 815 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987).
AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3726 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3726

 To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to improve efficiency and 
 guarantee accountability in the Urban Area Security Initiative grant 
                                program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 16, 2011

  Mr. Stivers (for himself and Mr. Higgins) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to improve efficiency and 
 guarantee accountability in the Urban Area Security Initiative grant 
                                program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Urban Area Security Initiative 
Modernization Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. URBAN AREA SECURITY INITIATIVE IMPROVEMENTS.

    The Homeland Security Act of 2002 is amended--
            (1) in section 2003(b)(2)(A) (6 U.S.C. 604(b)(2)(A))--
                    (A) in clause (i)--
                            (i) by striking ``(K)'' and inserting ``(K) 
                        and (L)''; and
                            (ii) by striking ``and'' at the end;
                    (B) in clause (ii), by striking the period and 
                inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following new clause:
                            ``(iii) the potential relative contribution 
                        of each eligible metropolitan area to a 
                        reduction or mitigation of the relative threat, 
                        vulnerability, and consequences from acts of 
                        terrorism faced nationally.''; and
            (2) in section 2007(a)(1) (6 U.S.C. 608 (a)(1))--
                    (A) by redesignating subparagraph (K) as 
                subparagraph (L); and
                    (B) by inserting after subparagraph (J) the 
                following new subparagraph:
                    ``(K) its past performance in contributing to the 
                reduction or mitigation of threat, vulnerability, and 
                consequences from acts of terrorism faced within either 
                the grantee's geographic area or the comprehensive 
                threat, vulnerability, and consequences faced 
                nationally.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Marie P. Fernandez, Appellant, v. Jose O. Fernandez, Respondent.

This is an appeal from an order granting the defendant husband’s motion to modify a decree of divorce so as to make provision for visitations by him. The motion, involving as it does the welfare of a child, should not have been decided upon the meager, conelusory and inadequate affidavits submitted herein, and the mother’s request for a hearing should have been granted. Order unanimously reversed and the matter remitted to Special Term, to take proof on notice, as to the fitness of the parties and on the other matters in issue and to make a determination consonant with the best interests of the child. Settle order on notice. Present — Callahan, J. P., Breitel, Bastow, Botein and Bergan, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-1241

GLADIS MERCEDES AMAYA-DIAZ; E.J.A.D.,

 Petitioners,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: November 20, 2023 Decided: January 4, 2024

Before WYNN and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: Vincent Rivas-Flores, KONARE LAW, Frederick, Maryland, for Petitioner. 

Brian Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Brianne Whelan Cohen, 

Senior Litigation Counsel, Matthew A. Spurlock, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil 

Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for 

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1241 Doc: 20 Filed: 01/04/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Gladis Mercedes Amaya-Diaz and her minor child, natives and citizens of 

Honduras, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing 

Amaya-Diaz’s appeal from the Immigration Judge’s denial of her applications for asylum, 

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have 

reviewed the record and Amaya-Diaz’s claims and conclude that the evidence does not 

compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1252(b)(4)(B), and that substantial evidence supports the denial of relief, see INS v. 

Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. 

In re Amaya-Diaz (B.I.A. Feb. 6, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1241 Doc: 20 Filed: 01/04/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
*The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-3760

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District

v. * of Minnesota.

*

Angel Lomas-Flores, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: May 18, 2001

Filed: May 24, 2001 

___________

Before LOKEN, ROSS, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Angel Lomas-Flores pleaded guilty to illegally reentering the United States after

deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Generally, the statutory maximum

sentence for this offense is two years. See id. If the alien was deported following a

conviction for an aggravated felony, however, the statutory maximum sentence is

twenty years. See id. § 1326(b)(2). Because Lomas-Flores had been deported after his

conviction for an aggravated felony, the district court* sentenced him to seventy months
-2-

in prison. Relying on Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), Lomas-Flores

contends his felony conviction must be charged in the indictment because the

conviction increases the statutory maximum penalty from two to twenty years. This

contention is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Raya-Ramirez, No. 00-

3839, 2001 WL 300563, at *1 (8th Cir. Mar. 29, 2001). In Raya-Ramirez, we held

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 226

(1998) (§ 1326(b)(2) enhancement properly applied to defendant who pleaded guilty

to violating § 1326(a), even though the indictment did not allege the defendant's earlier

aggravated felony convictions or mention§ 1326(b)(2)). The district court thus properly

applied the enhancement in Lomas-Flores's case, and we affirm his sentence.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Endeavour International Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-K as amended by Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-K/A for the annual period ended December 31,
2004 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
John N. Seitz, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ John N. SeitzJohn N. SeitzCo-Chief Executive Officer
 May 5, 2005 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Endeavour International Corporation and will be retained by Endeavour International Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
From : "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov

To: RobertJ W ay land/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Thomas Gillis/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Sarah Rees/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, "thomas.mark@epa.gov" <thomas.mark@epa.gov>, Gerain Perry/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 11/15/2011 08:53 AM Subject: FW : E.O. 12866 Meeting on Boilers MACT and CISWI Rules Hi all, Consistent with our EOs, attached are the handouts from the 11/9 meeting on the Boiler MACT and CISWI rules. W e will post these, along with the li st of attendees, on our website shortly. Regards, Cortney

----- Original Appointment----- From : Echols, Mabel E. Subject: E.O. 12866 Meeting on Boilers MACT and CIS WI Rules Wh en: W ednesday, November 09, 2011 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM (UTC - 05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada). Wh ere: Room 9104 New Executive Office Building Ti m Hunt, AF&PA has requested this meeting.(See attached file: Boiler MACT - NHSM OMB 11 - 9 - 11.pdf)(See attached file: Definition of resonated wood and resinated trim 10 - 11.pdf)(See attached file: Wa stewater Treatment Residuals Background 10 - 11.pdf)(See attached file: Final Cumulative Air Burden Economic Impact Summary.pdf)(See attached file: Fisher Study Executive Summary Jobs_9 - 7 - 11.pdf)(See attached file: URS A FPA cost Report Aug2011.pdf)