alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Wilhelmine Herrman, Defendant in Error, v. Anton Ernst and Margaretha Ernst, Plaintiffs in Error.

Gen. No. 18,583.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Judson F. Going, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1912.

Affirmed upon remittitur; otherwise reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed January 25, 1915.

Statement of the Case.

Action by Wilhelmine Herrmann against Anton and Margaretha, Ernst to recover for personal injuries received by plaintiff from being bitten by a dog belonging to defendants. To reverse a judgment entered on a verdict for two hundred dollars, defendants prosecute a writ of error.

Q. J. Chott, for plaintiffs in error.

*172Abstract of the Decision.

1. Animals, $ *46*
      ***
      *—when recovery for dog hite excessive.*A verdict for two hundred dollars for injuries sustained by a dog bite, *held*excessive to the extent of one hundred dollars, where it appeared plaintiff received a small bite on the leg which healed without delay.

2. Animals, § *43*—sufficiency of evidence.*In an action to recover for an injury resulting to plaintiff from a bite by defendants’ dog, where plaintiff claimed she was bitten by the dog which was chained near the entrance of defendants’ building when she went upon the premises to inquire concerning rooms for rent, and defendant asserted nonliability on the ground that plaintiff was a trespasser and also guilty of contributory negligence, *held*that a finding for plaintiff was sustained by the evidence.

No appearance for defendant in error.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Volt. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, earn# topic and section number.

Mr. Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### § 5.51 Scope and applicability.

These regulations establish procedures for investigating and determining alleged violations of 18 U.S.C. 207 (postemployment restrictions applicable to federal employees) or regulations issued by the Office of Government Ethics, set forth in 5 CFR parts 2637 and 2641, reflecting the views of the Office of Government Ethics and the Department of Justice as to the requirements of 18 U.S.C. 207.

[58 FR 15765, Mar. 24, 1993]
9/16/2020 Wayback Machine

https://web.archive.org/web/20030919235959/http://www.r7.fws.gov/planning/ 1/1

Home page

Who we are

By Office

External Affairs

Ecological Services

Fisheries

Migratory Birds

Federal Aid

Subsistence

Refuges

Fire Management

Water Resources

International Affairs

Law Enforcement

Administration

Volunteer

FAQS

Search

go

Alaska

All FWS

Advanced Search

Help [F1]

 Tech Requirements

 Accessibility

Privacy/Disclaimers

Internet Policy

Links of Interest

Regional Office

 Operational Status

Contact us

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service

Togiak National Wildlife Refuge

Planning News 

December 1999

The Togiak National Wildlife Refuge is beginning to revise its Comprehensive

Conservation Plan that will determine how the refuge is managed for the next

10-15 years. We'd like to hear from you. Public use within the refuge

boundary happens on private lands, State of Alaska lands and waters, and

refuge lands. Effective management of public activities and resources will

need coordination and cooperation between all land owners.

"CAMAI"

"Hello"

Purposes of the Togiak National Wildlife Refuge (established in Section

303(6)(B) of ANILCA):

(i) to conserve fish and wildlife populations and habitats in their natural

diversity including, but not limited to, salmonids, marine birds and mammals,

migratory birds and large mammals (including their restoration to historic

levels);

(ii) to fulfill the international treaty obligations of the United States with

respect to fish and wildlife and their habitats;

(iii) to provide, in a manner consistent with purposes set forth in

subparagraphs (i) and (ii), the opportunity for continued subsistence uses by

local residents; and

(iv) to ensure, to the maximum extent practicable and in a manner consistent

with the purposes set forth in subparagraph (i), water quality and necessary

water quantity within the refuge.

Where We Are Now:

We are starting by identifying the issues and opportunities that we will talk

about in the plan.

All the effort that you have put into the past planning projects is a tremendous

help to getting us started. We have reviewed your concerns from the Bristol

Bay Management Plan, the Togiak Refuge Comprehensive Conservation

Plan of 1987, the Public Use Management Plan of 1991, and comments

received when we started to revise the Public Use Management Plan in

1995.

Throughout all of these plans, there were some concerns that may still be

relevant today - not because the refuge hasn't worked to address them but
EXHIBIT
32.2








CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, J. Leonard Ivins, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Edgeline Holdings,
Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such  Form 10-Q
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Oncolin Therapeutics, Inc.





Date:  February
13, 2009














By:  /s/ J. Leonard
Ivins


J.
Leonard Ivins


Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 4896]

The U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy will hold a meeting at the United States Mission to the United Nations at 140 East 45th St., New York on December 7, 2004, from 10-11 a.m. The Commissioners will be briefed by Ambassador Anne Patterson.

The Commission was reauthorized pursuant to Public Law 106-113 (H.R. 3194, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2000). The U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy is a bipartisan Presidentially appointed panel created by Congress in 1948 to provide oversight of U.S. Government activities intended to understand, inform and influence foreign publics. The Commission reports its findings and recommendations to the President, the Congress and the Secretary of State and the American people. Current Commission members include Barbara M. Barrett of Arizona, who is the Chairman; Harold C. Pachios of Maine; Ambassador Penne Percy Korth of Washington, DC; Ambassador Elizabeth F. Bagley of Washington, DC; Charles “Tre” Evers III of Florida; Jay T. Snyder of New York; and Maria Sophia Aguirre of Washington, DC.

Seating is limited. For more information, please contact Leanne Cannon at (202) 203-7880.

Dated: November 24, 2004.

Razvigor Bazala,

(Executive Director Acting) IIP/ACPD, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 04-26505 Filed 11-30-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-11-P
PETITION FOR EXTENTION OF EXEMPTION 8480F FROM CERTAIN PROVISIO NS OF 14 CFR PART 110.2 FOR AMERIFLIGHT, LLC

This petition follows the requirements for inclusion in such documents set forth in the order presented in 14CFR Part 11.81

Your name and mailing address and, if you wish, other contact information such as a fax number, telephone number, or e-mail address

Mr. Andrew Lotter Senior Vice President of Flight Operations Ameriflight, LLC

1515 West 20 th Street

PO Box 612763 Dallas, TX 75261 Telephone – 877-456-8654 Ext. 76223

Email – alotter@ameriflight.com

The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek an exemption

Ameriflight seeks a renewal of Exemption 8480F for the followin g regulations:

 14 CFR Part 110.2

The reasons why granting your request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole

Nothing has changed since the last renewal for this exemption a nd it still remains valid and is in the public interest.

The reasons why granting the exemption would not adversely affect safety, or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek the exemption

Ameriflight continues to have a perfect safety record for all E MB120 operations and the renewal of this exemption will not adversely affect those opera tions.

If you want to exercise the privileges of your exemption outside the United States, the reason why you need to do

Yes, Ameriflight maintains the same procedures for domestic and international operations.

Sincerely,

Andrew Lotter

Senior Vice President Flight Operations
#### § 970.2502 Post voyage report.

Within 30 days of the conclusion of each exploration voyage, the United States citizen engaging in the voyage shall submit to NOAA a report containing any environmental data or information obtained during that voyage.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION1350)

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BeestonEnterprises Ltd, a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB forthe quarter ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the "Report"), I, Brian Smith, President/CEO of the Company,certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.Section 1350), that to my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations ofthe Company. 

 

 

***/s/ Brian Smith                               ***

Brian Smith, President, CEO

Dated: November 9, 2004

 

 

 

----

 

 

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION1350)

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BeestonEnterprises Ltd, a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB forthe quarter ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the "Report"), I, Cindy Watt, Secretary/CFO of the Company, certify,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section1350), that to my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations ofthe Company. 

 

 

***/s/ Cindy Watt                               ***

Cindy Watt, Secretary/CFO

Dated: November 9, 2004

 

 

 

----
511.1-1

 (Adopted February 5, l988)

RULE 511.1 SUBPOENAS

(a) Subpoenas shall be issued by the Chairman of the Hearing Board upon written

application of the party requesting its issuance.

(b) Applications for subpoenas shall, at a minimum, include:

(1) a declaration under penalty of perjury as to why such witness or documents 

are necessary to the proceeding; and

(2) a form of subpoena or subpoena duces tecum to be issued.

(c) Applications for subpoenas shall be submitted to the Clerk of the Board. The

party requesting issuance of the subpoena shall give telephone notice that such

application is being made to the opposing party prior to submission of the

application.

(d) If a party objects to the issuance of a subpoena or subpoena duces tecum, the

opposing party shall notify the Clerk of the Board of its opposition and may

request that a hearing be scheduled on the matter. The Clerk of the Board shall

notify both parties by telephone of the date, time and location of the hearing.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                  AND TREASURER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of HiEnergy Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bogdan
C. Maglich, Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                     By:  /s/ Bogdan C. Maglich
                                          -------------------------------
                                          Bogdan C. Maglich,
                                          Chief Executive Officer, President,
                                          Treasurer and Chief Scientific Officer
                                          (Principal Executive Officer and
                                          Principal Financial Officer)


July 26, 2005

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 4908] 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the object to be included in the exhibition “Raphael La Fornarina,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, is of cultural significance. The object is imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit object at the The Frick Collection, New York, NY from on or about December 2, 2004 to on or about January 30, 2005, the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, TX from on or about February 13, 2005 to on or about April 17, 2005, the Indianapolis Museum of Art, Indianapolis, IN from on or about May 6, 2005, to on or about June 26, 2005, and at possible additional venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit object, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, Department of State, (telephone: 202/453-8048). The address is Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001. 

      ( print page 69010)    
Dated: November 22, 2004. 

Patricia Harrison, 

Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 04-26292 Filed 11-24-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
**Exhibit 32.1**

******CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Worldwide Manufacturing USA, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, (the "Report"), I, Jimmy Wang, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)	The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and

2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
financial position and results of operations.

March 30, 2004

/s/ Jimmy Wang		Chief Executive Officer
#### Claudia Martinez et al., Appellants, v Porfirio Melendez, Respondent.

[821 NYS2d 270]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Grays, J.), dated March 29, 2005, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

*1000Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied.

The plaintiffs commenced this action against their landlord alleging that a dangerous and defective condition on the hallway stairs was a proximate cause of a trip and fall by the plaintiff Anthony Dique, then nine years old. At an examination before trial, Dique testified that he was descending the stairs while carrying his bicycle with his right hand, and that he tripped and fell after three or four steps, when one of his feet caught the edge of a metal nosing. Dique “tried to grab the handrail,” which was to his left, but his hand “just slipped off.” He fell down the stairs with his right leg out straight and his left leg bent behind him.

The landlord moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint based, inter alia, upon Dique’s deposition testimony. In opposition, the plaintiffs submitted an engineer’s affidavit, stating that the height of the handrail was insufficient pursuant to Multiple Dwelling Law § 52. The Supreme Court granted the motion. With respect to the metal nosing the court noted that “a small gap between the nosing and the tile of the top step” was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to liability. With respect to the handrail, the court found that the plaintiffs “failed to raise a triable issue with regard to causation, offering only speculation that in the circumstances presented the existing handrail was beyond reach,” citing *Hyman v Queens County Bancorp, Inc.*(3 NY3d 743 [2004], *affg*307 AD2d 984 [2003]).

We agree with the conclusion of the Supreme Court that the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact with respect to the nosing of the step. However, with respect to the handrail, the plaintiffs raised a triable issue of fact. The insufficient height of the handrail, if established at trial, would constitute negligence per se *(see Santana v Seagrave Fire Apparatus Corp.,*305 AD2d 395 [2003]). Moreover, Dique claimed that as he slipped, he grabbed the handrail and his hand slipped off. His attempt to use the existing handrail gives rise to an issue of fact as to whether the alleged defect in the existing handrail contributed to the accident *(see Cruz v Lormet Hous. Dev. Fund Corp.,*7 AD3d 660 [2004]). Since there are issues of fact as to whether Multiple Dwelling Law § 52 was violated, whether the violation constituted a proximate cause of the accident if it was violated, and whether Dique was comparatively negligent, summary judgment should have been denied. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Lunn, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-53,979] 

Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on January 12, 2004 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers of Gorecki Manufacturing, Inc., Milaca, Minnesota. 

                    The petitioning group of workers is covered by an active certification issued on March 10, 2003 and which remains in effect (TA-W-50,521). Consequently, further investigation in this case would                           ( print page 5865)                        serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.                 

Signed at Washington, DC this 21st day of January, 2004. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 04-2609 Filed 2-5-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-30-P