alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.18
 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
 This
Employment Agreement  Agreement ), st Company), Executive).
 Whereas
 Now
Therefore,
 1. Recital.
 2. No Prior Obligations.
 3. Employment.
 4. Term.
 5. Duties.
   (UNIQUELY ENGINEERED LOGO)




---



##### 



6. AT WILL EMPLOYMENT.
 7. Compensation.
 Salary)
    8. CASH
BONUS:  Cash Bonus )
 9. ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION UPON SEVERANCE:
   (UNIQUELY ENGINEERED LOGO)
 Confidential
    
    Page 2




---



##### 



10. ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION UPON A CHANGE IN CONTROL
          (UNIQUELY ENGINEERED LOGO)
 Confidential
    
    Page 3




---



##### 



11. Vacation;
Benefits.
   12. Confidential
Information and Company Property. Confidential Information
    13. Agreement not to Use or Disclose.
 (UNIQUELY ENGINEERED LOGO)
 Confidential
    
    Page 4




---



##### 



14. Ownership of Work Product.
 15. Covenant not to Compete or Interfere.
  (UNIQUELY ENGINEERED LOGO)
 Confidential
    
    Page 5




---



##### 



Section 15 Section 15
 16. Remedies for Breach.
 ex parte,
 Section 15,
  17. Governing Law, Waivers, Consent to Jurisdiction. THE EXECUTIVE AND THE COMPANY
HEREBY KNOWINGLY AND VOLUNTARILY WAIVES ANY RIGHT EITHER MAY HAVE TO
A TRIAL BY JURY.
 18. Entire
Agreement, Survival. Sections 12
 19. Binding
Effect.
 (UNIQUELY ENGINEERED LOGO)
 Confidential
    
    Page 6




---



##### 



20. Counterparts.
 In Witness Whereof ,
 WITNESS or ATTEST:
    
    
    
    HORNE INTERNATIONAL, INC./s/
    
    
    
    /s/ Darryl K. HorneName:
    
    
    
    Name: Darryl K. HorneTitle: Chief Executive OfficerEXECUTIVE/s/ Robert Werthmann
    
    
    
    /s/ John KrobathPrinted Name:
    
    
    
    Name: John Krobath
 (UNIQUELY ENGINEERED LOGO)
 Confidential
    
    Page 7
#### Morris Shapiro et al., Respondents, v. Front Line Sweaters Inc., Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-14-0013 SAT Date: 11/1/2013 Print Date: 12/3/2013

Related cases : Health related cases : Ecotox related cases:

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 2

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 1 11

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: Yes
Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ; Keywords : Keywords: LUNG; IRR-E,S,MM,L; AQUATOX Summary of Assessment :
Fate : Fate Summary: P-14-0012-3/5-6 FATE: Estimations for typical Liquid with MP < 25 C (E) log Kow = 4.21 (E) S = Dispersible / 6.57 mg/L at 25 C (ICB / E) VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) log Koc = 5.66 (E) log Fish BCF = 0.50 (E) log Fish BAF = 2.55 (E)POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption and biodeg Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong PBT Potential: P1B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

Health : Health Summary: Absorption is poor from the skin, moderate from the GI tract, and good from the lung (analog). Concern for surfactant effects on the lung; irritation to eye, skin (chronic), mucous membranes and lung based on surfactant properties of the compound.

Ecotox : Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 * daphnid 48-h LC50 25 green algal 96-h EC50 15.7 fish

_ chronic value 7.0 daphnid

_ chronic value 2.4
algal

_ chronic value 5.8
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for Aliphatic Amines-Acids; SAR chemical class = Aliphatic Amines; MW 527; S = dispersible (P); liquid with unknown mp (P); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; DW hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and DW TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 240

SARs Aliphatic Amines-Acids SAR Class Aliphatic Amines-Acids Ecotox Category Aliphatic Amines
Ecotox Factors Comments:
SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
No: III-14-028 July 11, 2014

CONTACT: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663

NRC Names New Senior Resident Inspector at Point Beach Nuclear Station

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has selected David Oliver as the new 

Senior Resident Inspector at the Point Beach Nuclear Power Plant in Two Rivers, 

Wis., approximately 13 miles northwest of Manitowoc. The nuclear power facility is 

operated by NextEra Energy. Oliver joined the NRC in 2011 as a licensing examiner 

for operators in Region III. Prior to joining the agency, he served nearly a decade in 

the U.S. Navy aboard the USS Enterprise and as an instructor at the Naval Nuclear 

Power Training Unit. Originally from Greenwood, Wis., Oliver holds a bachelor’s 

degree in applied nuclear engineering technology from Thomas Edison State College. 

Most recently, he was a NRC- licensed senior reactor operator for a nuclear power 

plant in the Midwest. 

 “David Oliver is an excellent inspector with a firm commitment to safety. He will help the NRC 

fulfill its mission of protecting people and the environment by helping ensure the Point Beach plant 

follows the high safety standards set by the NRC,” said Region III Administrator Cynthia D. Pederson.

 Each commercial nuclear power plant site in the United States has at least two NRC Resident 

Inspectors who monitor day-to-day operations at the plant. 

 The NRC Resident Inspectors at Point Beach can be reached at 920-755-2309.
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

#### § 200.16 [Reserved]
### §14193. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 103–322, title XXVII, §270003, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2091, which related to purposes of the Commission, was omitted as obsolete.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed March 1, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-2322 Lower Tribunal No. 18-23136

________________ 

### Heritage Property & Casualty Insurance Company , Appellant,
vs. 

### Samari Lakes East Condominium Association, Inc. , Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Mark Blumstein, Judge. Vaka Law Group, and George A. Vaka (Tampa); Link & Rockenbach, P.A., and Kara Rockenbach Link and David A. Noel (West Palm Beach), for appellant. Acle Law Firm, P.A., and Edward L. Acle and Rafael J. Solernou, Jr.; Kula & Associates, P. A., and Elliot B. Kula, W. Aaron Daniel, and William D. Mueller, for appellee. Before LOGUE, GORDO, and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
#### The Samuel Stores, Respondent, v. Popular Outfitting Company, Appellant.

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs.
#### Daniel J. Shanahan, Appellant, v. The State of New York, Respondent.

Judgment of the Court of Claims affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Howard, J., who dissented.
Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation



 Exhibit 10.4 
 Valassis Communications, Inc. 
 Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation 
 On June 22, 2007 the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Valassis Communications, Inc. (the “Corporation”), on recommendation of the
Compensation/Stock Option Committee, approved the compensation program described below to compensate non-employee directors for service on the Board and its committees. The compensation program described below became effective July 1, 2007 and
replaced the compensation program previously in effect. 
 The Corporation’s non-employee directors are entitled to receive the
following fees in connection with their participation on the Board and related Board committees: (i) an annual cash retainer fee of $42,500; (ii) an annual award of 1,400 shares of restricted stock of the Corporation pursuant to the
Corporation’s 2005 Employee and Director Restricted Stock Award Plan that becomes fully vested one year from the date of grant; (iii) $2,500 per Board meeting attended in person and $1,300 per Board meeting attended by telephone; and (iv)
$1,300 per Board committee meeting attended in person and $650 per Board committee meeting attended by telephone. 
 The annual cash retainer
and annual award of restricted stock are paid quarterly to the non-employee directors. The Board committee attendance fees are payable only if the committee meeting is not scheduled in conjunction with (just before or after) a Board meeting and
telephonic meeting fees are paid on a pro-rated basis if a non-employee director does not participate via telephone for the entire meeting. 
 In addition, each year, the Corporation’s non-employee directors are eligible to receive non-qualified stock options to purchase an aggregate of 10,000 shares of the Corporation’s common stock pursuant to the Corporation’s
2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan (or such other plan applicable to the Corporation’s non-employee directors in effect from time to time). These options are granted in two semi-annual installments consisting of 5,000 stock options on April 1 and
October 1 of each year, have an exercise price equal to the fair market value (as defined in the Corporation’s applicable stock option plan) of the Corporation’s common stock on the date of grant and become fully vested one year from the
date of grant, with the same terms and conditions as the Corporation’s standard non-qualified stock option agreement for non-employee directors.
01234

Miles

 ̄

Prepared by US Forest Service, Land Between The Lakes

GIS Laboratory, September 2004

Legend

ROS Zones

Rural

Roaded Natural

Remote Roaded Natural

Semi-Primitive Motorized

Semi-Primitive Non-Motorized

Road Level

Primitive

Better than Primitive

Other Features

Water

This product was produced from geospatial information prepared by

the USDA Forest Service. Source map scales vary and accuracy of

this product has not been assessed. Using GIS product for purposes

other than those for which they were created may yield inaccurate or

misleading results.

Disclaimer

Recreation Opportunity

Spectrum (ROS) NATIONAL RECREATION AREA

Lakes

Land Between

The
Order entered January 7 , 2019

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 01160

- CV

RICHARD GEHRKE AND P ACIFIC COMPANIES, IN C., Appellant s

V.

MERRITT HAWKINS AND ASSOCIATES , LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 18

- 09562



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellants’ January 4, 2019 motion for an extension of time to file a

brief. We GRANT the motion and exten d the time to January 21, 2019 . We caution appellant s

that further requests for extension in this accelerated appeal will be disfavored.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE
### Part B—High-Performance Commercial Buildings
Exhibit 31.1

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Jim Glavas, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of North American Natural Gas, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b)

paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition Rules contained in the SEC Release No. 33-8238



a)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



b)

disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and;



1.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.



Date:

July 7, 2004

By:

/s/ Jim Glavas



Jim Glavas, Principal Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b) OR 15d-14(b)  AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

Jon E. Kirchner hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|Date: May 12, 2008 |  |     |                                                                        
|------------------ |  | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                   |  | By: | /s/JON E. KIRCHNERJon E. Kirchner President and Chief Executive Officer

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to DTS, Inc. and will be retained by
DTS, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Superlattice Power, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ayaz Kassam, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Ayaz KassamChief
      Executive Officer andPrincipal
      Financial Officer





December
8, 2009
## In The **Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo**  No. 07 - 2 3 - 0004 3 - C R IN RE EARL WILLIS BENALLY , RELATOR ORIGINAL PROCEEDING 

### February 1 , 202 3 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and DOSS , J J . Pending before the Court is Relator’s pro se petition for writ of mandamus. Through it, Relator, Earl Willis Benally, seeks to compel the Honorable Douglas H. Freitag, presiding judge of the 140th Judicial District, to act upon Benally’s Motion for “90 - Da y” Loan of the Trial Records he claims to have filed on November 14, 2022. Though Benally has provided a limited appendix containing a copy of the motion without a file stamp bearing the time of filing, nothing supplied us establishes that his motion was p resented to the trial court or that the trial court otherwise knew of same. Such a flaw in the record is fatal to Benally ’ s attempt at securing relief. We have held that a “trial court cannot be found to have abused its discretion [for purposes of securi ng a writ of mandamus] until the complainant establishes that the court 1) had a legal duty2 to perform a non - discretionary act, 2) was asked to perform the act, and 3) failed or refused to do so.” In re Chavez , 62 S.W.3d 225, 228 (Tex. App.
— Amarillo 2001, orig. proceeding) ; see In re Norton , No. 07 - 22 - 00073 - CR, 2022 Tex. App. LEXIS 1805, at *2 (Tex. App.
—Amarillo Mar. 16, 2022, orig. proceeding) (mem. op., not designated for publication) . A complaint criticizing alleged inaction of a court upon a pending motion

“ would necessarily require [the complainant] to illustrate that the trial court was aware of the motion. ” Id. 1 Benally has failed to do so here. We deny Benally’s petition for writ of mandamus for this reason. The Clerk of this Court is direct ed to serve the Honorable Douglas H. Freitag with a copy of this order and the petition for writ of mandamus (and attachments thereto) in a manner affording Judge Fr ei tag actual notice of same. It is so ordered.

Per Curi a m
Do not publish.

1 Though we note that the copy of the motion in Benally’s appen d i x does not bear a file stamp, we caution that “[m]erely filing the motion with the court's clerk does not alone illustrate the court garnered the requisite knowledge or awareness.” See In re Norton , 2022 Tex. App. LEXIS 1805, at *2
.
[Criminal No. 63.]

#### TERRITORY OF ARIZONA, Respondent, v. JOSEPH H. YOUREE, Appellant.

APPEAL from the District Court of the Third Judicial District in and for the County of Yavapai.

Wilson *&*Norris, and Herndon & Hawkins, for Appellant.

Attorney-General, and H. D. Ross, District Attorney, for Respondent.

February 14, 1891.

Reversed.
#### The Peopleof the State of New York v. Alexander M. Falk.

Motion todismiss appeal granted. Present -Peck, P. J., Cohn, Breitel, Bastow and Rabin, JJ. v.-i ‘ .....(''-'i -*■ ‘ 5 vj-ü"' 5 The
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19

- 0328 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. DAVID RICHARD SENTI,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Tamara Stuckey is granted an extension of time to and including July 1 6 , 2020 , within which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on appeal. No further extensions will be granted. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 17 2020

06/17/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0328
§ 433.2 Preservation of consumers' claims and defenses, unfair or deceptive acts or practices. In connection with any sale or lease of goods or services to consumers, in or affecting commerce as “commerce” is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, it is an unfair or deceptive act or practice within the meaning of section 5 of that Act for a seller, directly or indirectly, to: ( a ) Take or receive a consumer credit contract which fails to contain the following provision in at least ten point, bold face, type: NOTICE ANY HOLDER OF THIS CONSUMER CREDIT CONTRACT IS SUBJECT TO ALL CLAIMS AND DEFENSES WHICH THE DEBTOR COULD ASSERT AGAINST THE SELLER OF GOODS OR SERVICES OBTAINED PURSUANT HERETO OR WITH THE PROCEEDS HEREOF. RECOVERY HEREUNDER BY THE DEBTOR SHALL NOT EXCEED AMOUNTS PAID BY THE DEBTOR HEREUNDER.
or,
( b ) Accept, as full or partial payment for such sale or lease, the proceeds of any purchase money loan (as purchase money loan is defined herein), unless any consumer credit contract made in connection with such purchase money loan contains the following provision in at least ten point, bold face, type:
NOTICE ANY HOLDER OF THIS CONSUMER CREDIT CONTRACT IS SUBJECT TO ALL CLAIMS AND DEFENSES WHICH THE DEBTOR COULD ASSERT AGAINST THE SELLER OF GOODS OR SERVICES OBTAINED WITH THE PROCEEDS HEREOF. RECOVERY HEREUNDER BY THE DEBTOR SHALL NOT EXCEED AMOUNTS PAID BY THE DEBTOR HEREUNDER.
[40 FR 53506, Nov. 18, 1975; 40 FR 58131, Dec. 15, 1975]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 232 (Friday, December 3, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 70279]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26589]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

[AAG/A Order No. 016-2004]


Privacy Act of 1974; Notice of Removal of a System of Records

    Pursuant to the provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 
552a), the Personnel Staff, Justice Management Division (JMD), 
Department of Justice (Justice), is removing a previously published 
Privacy Act system of records entitled ``Department of Justice Staffing 
and Classification System, Justice/JMD-021.'' Justice/JMD-021 was 
published in the Federal Register on October 30, 2001 (66 FR 54781).
    This notice is unnecessary because the records are adequately 
covered by an Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Governmentwide 
(GOVT) Privacy Act notice entitled ``Recruiting, Examining, and 
Placement Records, OPM/GOVT-5,'' last published in the Federal Register 
on April 27, 2000 (65 FR 24732, 24741). We note that the General 
Records Schedule (GRS) is revised periodically, and that the GRS 1, 
covering these records, has been updated since OPM published its 
notice. The Department of Justice maintains these records in accordance 
with the current disposition schedule for GRS 1. The GRS may be viewed 
at http://www.archives.gov/records_management/records_schedules.html.
    Therefore, the ``Department of Justice Staffing and Classification 
System, Justice/JMD-021'' is removed from the Department's compilation 
of Privacy Act systems of records, effective on the date of publication 
of this notice in the Federal Register.

    Dated: November 24, 2004.
Paul R. Corts,
Assistant Attorney General for Administration.
[FR Doc. 04-26589 Filed 12-2-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-CG-P