alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Wage Indexes: Long-Term Trend Data for Selected Occupations and Metropolitan Areas, 1907-66

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Wage Indexes: Long-Term Trend Data for Selected Occupations and Metropolitan Areas, 1907-66 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1505*,												Washington, D.C: 								U.S. G.P.O., 										November 1966,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4914,			accessed on September 26, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
### §1397l. Establishment and support of elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation forensic centers

#### (a) In general

The Secretary, in consultation with the Attorney General, shall make grants to eligible entities to establish and operate stationary and mobile forensic centers, to develop forensic expertise regarding, and provide services relating to, elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation.

#### (b) Stationary forensic centers

The Secretary shall make 4 of the grants described in subsection (a) to institutions of higher education with demonstrated expertise in forensics or commitment to preventing or treating elder abuse, neglect, or exploitation, to establish and operate stationary forensic centers.

#### (c) Mobile centers

The Secretary shall make 6 of the grants described in subsection (a) to appropriate entities to establish and operate mobile forensic centers.

#### (d) Authorized activities

#### (1) Development of forensic markers and methodologies

An eligible entity that receives a grant under this section shall use funds made available through the grant to assist in determining whether abuse, neglect, or exploitation occurred and whether a crime was committed and to conduct research to describe and disseminate information on—

(A) forensic markers that indicate a case in which elder abuse, neglect, or exploitation may have occurred; and

(B) methodologies for determining, in such a case, when and how health care, emergency service, social and protective services, and legal service providers should intervene and when the providers should report the case to law enforcement authorities.

#### (2) Development of forensic expertise

An eligible entity that receives a grant under this section shall use funds made available through the grant to develop forensic expertise regarding elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation in order to provide medical and forensic evaluation, therapeutic intervention, victim support and advocacy, case review, and case tracking.

#### (3) Collection of evidence

The Secretary, in coordination with the Attorney General, shall use data made available by grant recipients under this section to develop the capacity of geriatric health care professionals and law enforcement to collect forensic evidence, including collecting forensic evidence relating to a potential determination of elder abuse, neglect, or exploitation.

#### (e) Application

To be eligible to receive a grant under this section, an entity shall submit an application to the Secretary at such time, in such manner, and containing such information as the Secretary may require.

#### (f) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section—

(1) for fiscal year 2011, $4,000,000;

(2) for fiscal year 2012, $6,000,000; and

(3) for each of fiscal years 2013 and 2014, $8,000,000.

(Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XX, §2031, as added Pub. L. 111–148, title VI, §6703(a)(1)(C), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 790.)
Editorial Note on Part 922
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

§ 922.225 Permit procedures and review criteria. ( a ) A person may conduct an activity otherwise prohibited by § 922.223(a)(1) through (4) if conducted under and in accordance with the scope, purpose, terms and conditions of a permit issued under this section and subpart D of this part.
( b ) Applications for such permits should be addressed to the Director, Office of National Marine Sanctuaries; ATTN: Superintendent, Lake Ontario National Marine Sanctuary, 1305 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-50346 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versusJUAN FRANCISCO TOVAR-OLAIZ, also known as Juan Francisco TovarOlias, Defendant-Appellant.

____________________ Consolidated with No. 01-50348

_____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JUAN FRANCISCO TOVAR-OLAIZ, also known as Juan Francisco Tovar-Olias, also known as Jorge Hernandez-Guevara, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 97-CR-501-1

-------------------- December 11, 2001 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * In separate but related appeals Juan Francisco Tovar-Olaiz appeals (1) his sentence for conspiracy with intent to distributeNo. 01-50346 c/w 01-50348 -2- marijuana and (2) the revocation of his supervised release. Tovar-Olaiz contends that the district court failed to verify that he had read his presentence report (“PSR”) and discussed it with counsel prior to imposing sentence, as required by Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(c)(3)(A). He concedes that he did not object in the court below but contends that under the language of the rule and due to policy considerations remand for resentencing is required. We agree with Tovar-Olaiz that the district court failed to comply with Rule 32(c)(3)(A). However, because Tovar-Olaiz did not raise the issue of noncompliance in the district court, we will correct the error only if it was plain and affected his substantial rights. See United States v. Esparza-Gonzalez , 268 F.3d 272, 274 (5th Cir. 2001); see also United States v. Olano , 507 U.S. 725, 732-34 (articulating the plain error standard of review). Tovar-Olaiz concedes that erroneous information in the PSR regarding his children was corrected before the district court, and he identifies no remaining inaccuracies in the PSR. Tovar-Olaiz does not show that he was prejudiced at sentencing or in the revocation of his supervised release, and his speculations regarding future prejudice resulting from unspecified errors are insufficient to meet his burden to demonstrate plain error. See id. We therefore AFFIRM.
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No PMN: 09-0143 0144 Focus Ready Draft 1/22/2009 ENGINEER: Arnold \ AG PV (kg/yr):

SUBMITTER: USE: OTHER USES: MSDS: Yes Label: No Gen Eqpt: approved safety glasses or goggles / compatible chemical-resistant gloves and protective clothing / adequate ventilation to keep airborne concentrations low Respirator: Follow OSHA respirator regulations found in 29 CFR 1910.134 or related country specific or EU standards Health Effects: irritating to eyes and respiratory system / slight skin irritation may occur / may irritate gastrointestinal tract / high concentrations of dusts may be irritating to eyes, skin, mucous membranes, and respiratory tract. toxicological properties have not been fully investigated TLV/PEL: None Established

CRSS : Chemical Name: 3'H-Cyclopropa[8,25][5, 6]fullerene-C70-D5h(6)-3'-butanoic acid, 3'-phenyl-, methyl ester S-H20: 0.000001 g/L @ VP: 1.0E-6 torr @ MW: 1031.00 %<500 %<1000 Physical State and Misc CRSS Info: Neat: Mfg: Proc/Form: End Use: Solid:Consumer Use: SAT (concerns) (01/13/2009): Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: Migration to groundwater: Unknown PBT rating: PBT1 PBT rating: P Unknown; B Unknown; T1 Health: 1-2 Dermal, Inhalation Eco: 1 No releases to Water OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1-2B NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. This IRER is for a nanomaterial (functionalized fullerenes).POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: P2 Claim: EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No PMN: 09-0143 0144

Number of Sites/ Location: Days/yr: Basis: Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium.OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis: Inhalation:Dermal: INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No PMN: 09-0143 0144

Number of Sites/ Location: Unknown Customer Sites Days/yr: Basis: Process Description: ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium.OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis: Inhalation:Dermal: INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No PMN: 09-0143 0144

Number of Sites/ Location: Unknown Sites Days/yr: Basis:Process Description: ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium.

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis: Inhalation: negligible (VP < 0.001 torr); Inhalation not expected per GS.Dermal:
#### § 611.1 Cross-reference.

The rules formerly at 16 CFR part 611 have been republished by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau at 12 CFR 1022.140, “Fair Credit Reporting (Regulation V).”
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. on Form 20-F for
the year ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the SEC on the date hereof, I, Eva Chen, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 11, 2017



By:

/s/ Eva ChenName:

Eva ChenTitle:

Chief Financial Officer




|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No: IV-16-016 July 8, 2016 

CONTACT: Victor Dricks, 817-200-1128

NRC Issues $7,000 Civil Penalty to Acuren USA

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a $7,000 civil penalty to Acuren USA for 

violations of NRC regulations related to its industrial radiographic operations at a facility in Kenai, 

Alaska. The company is licensed to use radioactive materials in devices for making images of pipe 

welds.

Inspectors walking around the outside of the facility during an unannounced inspection on 

April 10, 2014, observed high readings on their radiation survey meters in an area without boundaries 

or physical controls to prevent entry by the public during radiography operations. 

An initial dose estimate performed by the inspectors indicated that had a member of the public

been standing next to the building during the time the radiography operations were conducted on that 

day, they could have been exposed to radiation in excess of NRC annual limits (100 millirem). In

addition, the inspectors were concerned that over the course of a year, members of the public employed

in a nearby office had the potential to receive a dose in excess of NRC annual limits. The NRC 

determined that no members of the public had received radiation exposures as a result of the company’s 

failure to establish required controls. The company has taken numerous corrective actions designed to 

ensure safe operations at the Kenai facility.

NRC staff met with company officials May 12 to discuss results of the NRC inspection before 

determining that seven violations of NRC regulations had occurred, including two that were willful. 

The violations were identified in an NRC inspection report issued March 24.
Exhibit 31.2 

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, R. Brooks Sherman, Jr., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Inergy Holdings, L.P.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 9, 2005
#### Mary M. Kennedy, Respondent, v. Milner Hotels, Inc., Appellant.

Present — Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ. [See *post,*p. 811.]
### §14137a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 14137a was editorially reclassified as section 40742 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
IN RESPONSE, PLEASE 

 REFER TO: M150924A 

September 24, 2015 

MEMORANDUM FOR: Brooke P. Clark, Director 

Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication 

FROM: Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS - AFFIRMATION SESSION, 9:55 A.M., 

THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 2015, COMMISSIONERS' 

CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH, 

ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND (OPEN TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE) 

I. SECY-15-0097 – Tennessee Valley Authority (Watts Bar Unit 2) – Petition for Review of 

LBP-15-14

The Commission approved a Memorandum and Order responding to the Southern Alliance for 

Clean Energy’s (SACE) petition for review of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board’s decision 

in LBP-15-14 to deny SACE’s motion to reopen the record. The Memorandum and Order 

denies the petition for review. 

(Subsequently, on September 24, 2015, the Secretary signed the Memorandum and Order.) 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 EDO 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA 

 OIG 

 OPA 

 Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR
EXHIBIT 32.2


Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer


of CNA Financial Corporation


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350


(As adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of CNA Financial Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:


|  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|• | the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|  |                                                                                                                                                     
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|• | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 3, 2011


/s/ D. Craig MenseD. Craig MenseChief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### Mildred R. Herniman, an Infant, etc., Respondent, v. The New York Central Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Foote and Merrell, JJ., who dissented.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0028

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

DUSTIN LEE SEYLER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including December 22, 2023, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 15 2023

11/15/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0028
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATIONI, Shirley L. Tyler, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of United Heritage Bankshares of Florida,Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.                 Date: November 7, 2006  By:  /s/ Shirley L. Tyler    Shirley L. Tyler, Executive Vice President       and Treasurer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.