alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 700.3 Priority ratings and rated orders. ( a ) Rated orders are identified by a priority rating, which consists of a rating symbol (DO or DX), and a program identification symbol. Rated orders take precedence over all unrated orders as necessary to meet required delivery dates. Rating symbols indicate the level of priority. Among rated orders, DX rated orders take precedence over DO rated orders. Program identification symbols indicate which approved program is attributed to the rated order.
( b ) Persons receiving rated orders must give them preferential treatment as required by this part.
( c ) All rated orders must be scheduled to the extent possible to ensure delivery by the required delivery date.
( d ) Persons who receive rated orders must in turn place rated orders with their suppliers for the industrial resources they need to fill the orders. This provision ensures that suppliers will give priority treatment to rated orders from contractor to subcontractor to suppliers throughout the procurement chain.
( e ) Persons may place a priority rating on orders only when they are in receipt of a rated order, have been explicitly authorized to do so by the Department of Commerce or a Delegate Agency, or are otherwise permitted to do so by this part.
[49 FR 30414, July 30, 1984. Redesignated at 54 FR 601, Jan. 9, 1989, as amended at 63 FR 31921, June 11, 1998; 79 FR 47563, Aug. 14, 2014; 89 FR 58970, July 22, 2024]
#### Ralph S. Crellin, Respondent, v. Morris Altman, Appellant.

Order dismissing appeal vacated upon condition that appellant file and serve printed papers and brief within two weeks and pay to respondent’s attorney ten dollars.
EXHIBIT 32
----------




            CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
            --------------------------------------------------


      The following statement is provided by the undersigned with respect
to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be
deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 or any other securities law:

      Each of the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on
Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of KAANAPALI LAND, LLC.




    By:  /s/  Gary Nickele                By: /s/  Gailen J. Hull
         ---------------------------          ---------------------------
         Gary Nickele                         Gailen J. Hull
         Chief Executive Officer              Chief Financial Officer and
                                              Chief Accounting Officer
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Horne International, Inc..;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and(c)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants third fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 By:
    /s/ Michael M. MeglessMichael M. MeglessChief Financial OfficerHorne International, Inc.  29
§ 503.2 Status of specific items under the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act. Recent questions submitted to the Commission concerning whether certain articles, products or commodities are included under the definition of the term *consumer commodity,* as contained in section 10(a) of the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act, have been considered in the light of the Commission's interpretation of that term as set forth in § 503.5 of this part as follows: ( a ) The Commission is of the opinion that the following commodities or classes of commodities are not “consumer commodities” within the meaning of the Act. Antifreeze. Artificial flowers and parts. Automotive accessories. Automotive chemical products. Automotive replacement parts. Bicycle tires and tubes. Books. Brushes (bristle, nylon, etc.). Brooms and mops. Cameras. Chinaware. Christmas light sets. Cigarette lighters. Clothespins (wooden, plastic). Compacts and mirrors. Diaries and calendars. Flower seeds. Footwear. Garden tools. Gift ties and tapes. Glasses and glassware. Gloves (work type). Greeting cards. Hand tools. Handicraft and sewing thread. Hardware. Household cooking utensils. Inks. Jewelry. Luggage. Magnetic recording tape. Metal pails. Motor oil (automobile). Mouse and rat traps. Musical instruments. Paintings and wall plaques. Photo albums. Pictures. Plastic table cloths, plastic placement and plastic shelf paper. Rubber gloves (household). Safety flares. Safety pins. School supplies. Sewing accessories. Silverware, stainless steelware and pewterware. Small arms ammunition. Smoking pipes. Souvenirs. Sporting goods. Toys. Typewriter ribbons. Woodenware.
( b ) The Commission is of the opinion that the following commodities or classes of commodities are “consumer commodities” within the meaning of the Act:
Adhesives and sealants. Aluminum foil cooking utensils. Aluminum wrap. Camera supplies. Candles. Christmas decorations. Cordage. Disposable diapers. Dry cell batteries. Light bulbs. Liquified petroleum gas for other than heating and cooking. Lubricants for home use. Photographic chemicals. Pressure sensitive tapes, excluding gift tapes. Solder. Solvents and cleaning fluids for home use. Sponges and chamois. Waxes for home use.
[35 FR 6185, Apr. 16, 1970]
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-16-0131:  Denial of Petition for Rulemaking on Uninterruptible Monitoring of Coolant and Fuel in Reactors and Spent Fuel Pools (PRM-50-113; NRC-2015-0230)

Accession Number: ML16027A007

Date Released: Wednesday, February 22, 2017

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML16027A006 - SECY-16-0131:  Denial of Petition for Rulemaking on Uninterruptible Monitoring of Coolant and Fuel in Reactors and Spent Fuel Pools (PRM-50-113; NRC-2015-0230) (4 page(s), 11/16/2016)
    - ML16027A004 - SECY-16-0131:  Enclosure 1 - Federal Register Notice regarding Denial of Petition for Rulemaking on Uninterruptible Monitoring of Coolant and Fuel in Reactors and Spent Fuel Pools (10 page(s), 11/16/2016)
    - ML16027A005 - SECY-16-0131:  Enclosure 2 - (Draft) Letter to Petitioner regarding Denial Uninterruptible Monitoring of Coolant and Fuel in Reactors and Spent Fuel Pools (1 page(s), 11/16/2016)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### § 23.22 Misrepresentation as to cultured pearls.

It is unfair or deceptive to misrepresent the manner in which cultured pearls are produced, the size of the nucleus artificially inserted in the mollusk and included in cultured pearls, the length of time that such products remained in the mollusk, the thickness of the nacre coating, the value and quality of cultured pearls as compared with the value and quality of pearls and imitation pearls, or any other material matter relating to the formation, structure, properties, characteristics, and qualities of cultured pearls.
#### In the Matter of James M. Gifford.

Proceeding dismissed. Order to be settled on notice. Present—Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Smith and Page, JJ.
§ 1505.50 Stalled motor testing. ( a ) § 1505.6(e)(4)(ii) requires that a motor-operated toy be tested with the motor stalled if the construction of the toy is such that any person can touch moving parts associated with the motor from outside the toy. The performance of the toy shall be considered unacceptable if, during the test, temperatures higher than those specified in § 1505.8 are attained or if temperatures higher than those specified for Type C surfaces in § 1505.7 are attained on any accessible surface of the motor.
( b ) To determine if a moving part associated with the motor can be touched from outside the toy, the Commission staff will use a 1 ⁄ 4-inch diameter rod, as referenced in § 1505.4(h)(1). If the rod, when inserted into openings in the toy, can touch any moving part associated with the motor, the toy will be tested with the motor stalled.
( c ) The requirement that temperatures higher than those specified in § 1505.8 not be attained applies to those internal components which are described in § 1505.8. Additionally, temperatures of accessible surfaces shall not exceed those specified for Type C surfaces in § 1505.7.
(Secs. 2(q)(1)(A), 2(r), 3(e), 10(a), 74 Stat. 372, 378, 80 Stat. 1303-1304, 83 Stat. 187-189 (15 U.S.C. 1261, 1262, 1269); sec. 30(a), 86 Stat. 1231 (15 U.S.C. 2079(a)))
[43 FR 26428, June 20, 1978]
March 2, 2015 

MEMORANDUM TO: Mark A. Satorius 

 Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS – SECY-14-0125 – REQUEST BY 

ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., FOR EXEMPTIONS 

FROM CERTAIN EMERGENCY PLANNING REQUIREMENTS 

The Commission has approved the staff's recommendation to grant Entergy Nuclear 

Operations, Inc.’s request for exemptions from certain emergency planning requirements of 

10 CFR 50.47(b) and Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50 for the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power 

Station to be implemented as stipulated in SECY-14-0125. 

The Commission continues to support the current practice of approving appropriately justified 

exemptions from certain emergency planning requirements while plants are transitioning to 

decommissioning based on site-specific evaluations. 

The Commission looks forward to the staff addressing decommissioning issues in a 

comprehensive rulemaking. 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA 

 OPA 

 Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR
Offer Letter with David Webber



 Exhibit 10.1 
 April 6, 2007 
 Mr. David W. Weber 
 2341 Romano Circle 
 Pleasanton, CA 94566 
 Dear David,

 I am pleased to offer you the position of Chief Operating Officer of ABIOMED, INC. with a starting base salary paid at the semi-monthly rate of $10,416,
(equivalent to $250,000 per year). You will be eligible for a bonus with an annual target pay-out of $100,000 for outstanding performance. Your bonus will be based on achievement of personal and Company objectives, which will be established within
your first 30 days of employment. In addition, pending a start date of April 23, 2007, the Company agrees to pay you a sign-on bonus of $12,000. This position will be located in our Danvers, MA facility and will report directly to me.

 Subject to approval by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, you will also be granted a sign-on option to purchase 130,000 shares of
Common Stock of ABIOMED, Inc. pursuant to the Company’s Incentive Stock Option Plan. Under the plan, this option will be granted at the closing market price on the date when you begin employment with ABIOMED. The option will vest over four
years according to the following schedule: 25% on your one-year anniversary of the option issuance date, and 25% on your second, third, and fourth anniversary date of the issuance. 
 ABIOMED, Inc. offers competitive and comprehensive benefit plans. You will be eligible upon your date of hire to participate in the plans, which include medical, dental, life, long and short-term disability insurance.
You will also be eligible to participate in our 401(k) plan, which includes a matching contribution. All benefits are subject to the provisions of the individual plan. You will also accrue vacation at a rate of 4 weeks per year. 
 Your employment with ABIOMED is subject to the successful completion of a Company-paid initial-employment drug screen and background check. In addition, all employees
are required to sign our standard employment, nondisclosure/non-compete agreement and complete all statutory employment forms. Instructions and documentation necessary to complete the forms are enclosed. 
 Once you have had an opportunity to review the above information, please confirm your acceptance of this offer, by signing the original of this letter and returning one
copy of this letter to me. This offer will expire three business days from the date of issuance. 
 We look forward to your joining ABIOMED and to your many
contributions toward our continued growth and success. Should you have any questions or require more specific information, please call me at 978-646-1810. 
 Sincerely, 
 /s/ Mike Minogue 
 Mike Minogue

 Chairman, President & CEO 
 ABIOMED, Inc. 

AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED 
 I accept the above described position and
terms of employment. My start date will be 4-23-07. 
 /s/ David W. Weber         
 David W. Weber 
 4-10-07         
 Date
### §11706. Administrative grant for Papa Ola Lokahi

#### (a) In general

In addition to any other grant or contract under this chapter, the Secretary may make grants to, or enter into contracts with, Papa Ola Lokahi for—

(1) coordination, implementation, and updating (as appropriate) of the comprehensive health care master plan developed pursuant to section 11703 of this title;

(2) training for the persons described in section 11705(c)(1)(B) of this title;

(3) identification of and research into the diseases that are most prevalent among Native Hawaiians, including behavioral, biomedical, epidemiological, and health services;

(4) the development of an action plan outlining the contributions that each member organization of Papa Ola Lokahi will make in carrying out the policy of this chapter;

(5) a clearinghouse function for—

(A) the collection and maintenance of data associated with the health status of Native Hawaiians;

(B) the identification and research into diseases affecting Native Hawaiians; and

(C) the availability of Native Hawaiian project funds, research projects and publications;

(6) the coordination of the health care programs and services provided to Native Hawaiians; and

(7) the administration of special project funds.

#### (b) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary for fiscal years 1993 through 2019 to carry out subsection (a).

(Pub. L. 100–579, §7, Oct. 31, 1988, 102 Stat. 2921; Pub. L. 100–690, title II, §2307, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4227; Pub. L. 102–396, title IX, §9168, Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1948; Pub. L. 111–148, title X, §10221(a), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 935.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–148 is based on section 202(a) of title II of S. 1790, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, as reported by the Committee on Indian Affairs of the Senate in Dec. 2009, which was enacted into law by section 10221(a) of Pub. L. 111–148.

The 1992 amendment is based on section 1 of S. 2681, One Hundred Second Congress, as passed by the Senate on Aug. 7, 1992, and enacted into law by section 9168 of Pub. L. 102–396. Section 9168, which referred to S. 2681, as passed by the Senate on "September 12, 1992", has been treated as referring to S. 2681, as passed by the Senate on Aug. 7, 1992, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

Pub. L. 100–579 and Pub. L. 100–690 enacted substantially identical sections. The text of this section is based on section 7 of Pub. L. 100–579, as subsequently amended.

#### Amendments

2010—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 111–148, which directed the amendment of section 7(b) of the Native Hawaiian Health Care Act of 1988 by substituting "2019" for "2001", was executed by making the amendment to this section, which is section 7 of the Native Hawaiian Health Care Improvement Act, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

1992—Pub. L. 102–396 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to assignment of personnel.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Bernard Benson, Respondent, for Compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Law, v. Stephen Penney, Employer, and London Guarantee and Accident Company, Insurance Carrier, Appellants.

Award unanimously affirmed, on the opinion in *Marhoffer*v. *Marhoffer (ante,*p. 52), decided herewith.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 25 (Friday, February 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 5863]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2598]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-53,927]


Dixie Chips, Inc., Evergreen, AL; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on January 2, 2004 in response to a worker 
petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Dixie 
Chips, Inc., Evergreen, Alabama.
    The petitioning group of workers is covered by an earlier petition 
filed on December 29, 2003 (TA-W-53,906) that is the subject of an 
ongoing investigation for which a determination has not yet been 
issued. Further investigation in this case would duplicate efforts and 
serve no purpose; therefore the investigation under this petition has 
been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 8th day of January, 2004.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-2598 Filed 2-5-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6428

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

HARRY T. HANLEY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. Elizabeth V. Hallanan,

Senior District Judge. (CR-91-66, CA-95-1052-1)

Submitted: August 27, 1998 Decided: September 10, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harry T. Hanley, Appellant Pro Se. John Castle Parr, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s orders denying his

motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28

U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998)) and denying his motion

for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hanley, Nos. CR91-66; CA-95-1052-1 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 14 & July 18, 1997). See Lindh

v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No.

96-6298). To the extent that Appellant raises the same claims as he

raised in a prior § 2255 motion, those claims are procedurally

defaulted. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-14-0022 - Report to Congress on Abnormal Occurrences: Fiscal Year 2013

Accession Number: ML13323A987

Date Released: Monday, June 16, 2014

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML13323B054 - SECY-14-0022 - Report to Congress on Abnormal Occurences: Fiscal Year 2013 (4 page(s), 2/25/2014)
    - ML13323B026 - SECY-14-0022 - Enclosure 1 - NUREG-0090, Volume 36, "Report to Congress on Abnormal Occurrences: Fiscal Year 2013" (10 page(s), 2/25/2014)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer