alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC STAFF SCHEDULES MEETING WITH SHAW AREVA MOX SERVICES

TO DISCUSS PERFORMANCE AT MIXED OXIDE FACILITY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a meeting with officials of 

Shaw Areva MOX Services on April 17 to discuss the results of the Applicant Performance 

Review for the Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility currently under construction at the 

Savannah River site.

The meeting is scheduled to begin at 2 p.m. at the Hydrogen Research Center on the 

Savannah River Research Campus, 301 Gateway Dr., New Ellenton, S.C. People attending the 

meeting will not be required to go through Savannah River site security. NRC staff members will

be available to answer questions or provide information after the formal portion of the meeting.

The NRC review covered the period from Oct. 1, 2011, to Dec. 31, 2012 and concluded 

that construction activities were consistent with NRC rules and regulations as well as the 

conditions of the MOX construction authorization. No areas were identified as needing 

improvement and the NRC plans to continue to conduct its extensive inspection of construction 

activities at the site. 

The MOX facility, being constructed by Shaw Areva MOX Services, is located at the 

U.S. Department of Energy’s Savannah River site near Aiken, S.C. The facility will be owned by 

the DOE’s National Nuclear Security Administration and will convert supplies of surplus 

weapons-grade plutonium into more proliferation-resistant forms by blending it with natural or 

depleted uranium. Converting the plutonium into MOX fuel will enable it to be used in 

commercial reactors to generate electricity. The NRC issued a construction authorization for the 

facility in March 2005. 

The performance review letter for the MOX facility is available on the NRC website.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No: II-13-014

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416 

 April 9, 2013

E-mail: OPA2.Resource@nrc.gov
§ 1209.36 Production testing. ( a ) *General.* Manufacturers, private labelers, and importers shall test the cellulose insulation periodically as it is manufactured to demonstrate that the product being manufactured is substantially similar to the product which passed the qualification testing and to demonstrate that the product being manufactured meets the requirements of the standard.
( b ) *Types and frequency of testing.* Manufacturers, private labelers, and importers shall determine the types of tests for production testing. Each production test shall be conducted at a production interval short enough to ensure that if the samples selected for testing meet the standard or a portion of the standard, the insulation produced during the interval will also meet the standard or the appropriate portion of the standard.
( c ) *Test failure.* If any test yields failing results, production must cease and the faulty manufacturing process must be corrected (see § 1209.37). In addition, the material from which the samples were taken may not be distributed in commerce unless the material can be corrected (see § 1209.37) so as to yield passing results and meet the standard. Cellulose insulation that does not comply with the standard cannot be sold or offered for sale.
#### Vincenza E. Murray, Respondent, v. Frank E. Murray, Appellant.

Order unanimously modified so as to fix temporary alimony at the sum of $40 per week and counsel fee at the sum of $300 and, as so modified, affirmed. The amounts allowed by Special Term, on this record, are excessive. Settle order on notice. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Breitel and Botein, JJ.
No. 16-017 March 29, 2016

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200

NRC Meetings April 12 in Oak Ridge, Tenn., to Discuss

Review Process for Early Site Permit Application

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold two meetings in Oak Ridge, Tenn., on Tuesday, 

April 12, to discuss how the agency reviews Early Site Permit (ESP) applications for nuclear power 

plants. The Tennessee Valley Authority is expected to file an ESP application in May for the Clinch 

River site near Oak Ridge.

“We’re coming to Oak Ridge to inform people near Clinch River how we examine a site to see 

if it’s suitable for a nuclear power plant,” said Jennifer Dixon-Herrity, chief of the Environmental 

Projects Branch in the NRC’s Office of New Reactors. “Our process gives the public several 

opportunities to provide us information as we review an application.”

The NRC will hold the meetings at the Pollard Technology Conference Center, 210 Badger 

Ave. in Oak Ridge. The first meeting will run from 2-4 p.m. and the second meeting runs from 7-9 p.m. 

The NRC staff will describe the overall ESP review process, which includes safety and environmental 

assessments, as well as the public’s opportunities to participate. The NRC will host open houses an 

hour before each meeting so members of the public have the opportunity to talk informally with agency 

staff.

An NRC decision to issue an ESP means the site is suitable for a nuclear power facility, but a 

company would have to seek a separate license to build and operate a reactor. An ESP is valid for 

10 to 20 years and can potentially be renewed for an additional 10 to 20 years. More information on the 

NRC’s new reactor licensing process is available on the agency’s Web site.
#### In the Matter of Arbitration between Jack Morantz et al., Copartners Trading as M and M Meat Market, Respondents, and Samuel Berliant, Appellant.

Brewster, Deyo and Bergan, JJ., concur; Heffernan, J., dissents in the following memorandum in which Foster, P. J., concurs: The only question submitted to the arbitrators in this ease is whether or not appellant “ injured the reputation or standing ” of the respondents. An award of money damage was waived. No justiciable question is presented for review. Complete jurisdiction includes not only the power to hear and determine the case, but also power to enforce the judgment. This court has no power to enforce any judgment herein and hence it should decline to entertain or to attempt to exercise jurisdiction where it has no power to enforce the judgment which may be rendered. Accordingly, this court having no jurisdiction, the appeal should be dismissed.
Amendment No. 2 to Consulting Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.103 
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT 
 This AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT (the
“Amendment No. 2”) is made and entered into as of April 16, 2007, by and between Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Gary D. Tollefson, M.D., Ph.D., an individual
residing in the State of Indiana (“Consultant”). 
 RECITALS 
 A. The Company currently engages Consultant pursuant to the terms and conditions of that certain Consulting Agreement dated April 16, 2004 (the
“Consulting Agreement”) and the Amendment to Consulting Agreement dated May 16, 2006. 
 B. The Company and Consultant
desire to amend the Consulting Agreement to extend the term set forth therein, as provided in greater detail below. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the mutual agreements and covenants hereinafter set forth and for other valuable consideration, the Company and Consultant hereby agree as follows: 
 AGREEMENT 
 1. Definitions. Unless otherwise defined, capitalized terms used herein shall have
the meanings assigned to them in the Consulting Agreement. 
 2. Term. Section 2(a) of the Consulting Agreement is hereby amended
and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 
 “Term. Consultant’s engagement with the Company shall commence on the
Effective Date and shall continue for a period of forty-eight (48) months thereafter, subject to earlier termination as hereinafter provided.” 
 3. Continuing Force and Effect. Except as herein expressly amended, modified and/or supplemented, all terms, covenants and provisions of the Consulting Agreement and Amendment to Consulting Agreement dated
May 16, 2006 are and shall remain in full force and effect and all references therein to such Consulting Agreement shall henceforth refer to the Consulting Agreement as amended by this Amendment No. 2. This Amendment No. 2 shall be
deemed incorporated into, and a part of, the Consulting Agreement. 
 [Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank; Signature Page Follows]








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 2 has been made and entered into as of the date and year
first above written. 
  

	
	“Company”
	
	Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
	
	/s/ Roger G. Stoll
	Roger G. Stoll, Ph.D.
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	
	“Consultant”
	
	/s/ Gary D. Tollefson
	Gary D. Tollefson, M.D., Ph.D.
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

#### §§ 200.612-200.629 [Reserved]
§ 145.4 Public records available with identifying details deleted; nonpublic records available in abridged or summary form. ( a ) To the extent required to prevent a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, the Commission may delete identifying details when it makes available “public records” as defined in § 145.0(b). In such instances, the Commission shall explain the justification for the deletion fully in writing.
( b ) Certain “nonpublic records,” as defined in § 145.0(c), may, as authorized by the Commission, be made available for public inspection and copying in an abridged or summary form, with identifying details deleted.
[51 FR 26869, July 28, 1986, as amended at 82 FR 28003, June 20, 2017]
#### Wood & Selick, Inc., Appellant, v. Wabash Railroad Company, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ARC Corporate Realty Trust, Inc.®(ACRT) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce Nelson, Chief Financial Officer of ACRT, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of ACRT.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Bruce Nelson       
|Bruce Nelson           
|Chief Financial Officer
|July 25, 2006
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

#### §§ 200.25-200.26 [Reserved]
#### Robert I. Lennox, Respondent, v. Ebben Schramm, Appellant.

Order reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant, and the motion granted, and judgment is directed to be entered in favor of the appellant dismissing the complaint herein, with costs. The complaint does not allege that the words were spoken of the plaintiff in his professional capacity, and plaintiff has failed to plead special damages. The usual requirement in slander actions that a crime be charged is controlling. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Breitel, JJ.; Cohn, J., dissents in the following memorandum: I dissent and vote to affirm on the ground that the slanderous words charged a specifically identified person with a specific instance of cheating against a specifically identified person of a specified sum of money, which is sufficient to charge the plaintiff with the commission of a crime.
§ 700.7 Use of warranty registration cards. ( a ) Under section 104(b)(1) of the Act, 15 U.S.C. 2304(b)(1), a warrantor offering a full warranty may not impose on consumers any duty other than notification of a defect as a condition of securing remedy of the defect or malfunction, unless such additional duty can be demonstrated by the warrantor to be reasonable. Warrantors have in the past stipulated the return of a “warranty registration” or similar card. By “warranty registration card” the Commission means a card which must be returned by the consumer shortly after purchase of the product and which is stipulated or implied in the warranty to be a condition precedent to warranty coverage and performance.
( b ) A requirement that the consumer return a warranty registration card or a similar notice as a condition of performance under a full warranty is an unreasonable duty. Thus, a provision such as, “This warranty is void unless the warranty registration card is returned to the warrantor” is not permissible in a full warranty, nor is it permissible to imply such a condition in a full warranty.
( c ) This does not prohibit the use of such registration cards where a warrantor suggests use of the card as one possible means of proof of the date the product was purchased. For example, it is permissible to provide in a full warranty that a consumer may fill out and return a card to place on file proof of the date the product was purchased. Any such suggestion to the consumer must include notice that failure to return the card will not affect rights under the warranty, so long as the consumer can show in a reasonable manner the date the product was purchased. Nor does this interpretation prohibit a seller from obtaining from purchasers at the time of sale information requested by the warrantor.
[42 FR 36114, July 13, 1977, as amended at 80 FR 42721, July 20, 2015]
IIB 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3670 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 4, 2012 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, 

and Transportation 

AN ACT 

To require the Transportation Security Administration to 

comply with the Uniformed Services Employment and 

Reemployment Rights Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3670 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY OF THE UNIFORMED SERVICES 

2 EMPLOYMENT AND REEMPLOYMENT RIGHTS 

3 ACT TO THE TRANSPORTATION SECURITY AD4 MINISTRATION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 111(d) of the Aviation 

6 and Transportation Security Act (49 U.S.C. 44935 note; 

7 Public Law 107–71) is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘Notwithstanding’’ and insert9 ing the following: 

10 ‘‘(1) GENERAL AUTHORITY.—Except as pro11 vided in paragraph (2), and notwithstanding’’; and 

12 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘(2) UNIFORMED SERVICES EMPLOYMENT AND

14 REEMPLOYMENT RIGHTS ACT.—In carrying out the 

15 functions authorized under paragraph (1), the 

16 Under Secretary shall be subject to the provisions 

17 set forth in chapter 43 of title 38, United States 

18 Code.’’. 

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

20 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date that is 270 

21 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 30, 2012. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1504-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the Federated States of Micronesia (FEMA-1504-DR), dated December 19, 2003, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

January 30, 2004. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the Federated States of Micronesia is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of December 19, 2003:

Chuuk State for emergency protective measures (Category B) under the Public Assistance program, limited to distribution of food commodities (already designated for Individual Assistance limited to Emergency Food Assistance through USDA for the islands of Namonuito Atoll, the Hall Islands, and the Western Islands within Chuuk State.) 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individual and Household Housing; 97.049, Individual and Household Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 Individual and Household Program-Other Needs, 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.) 

Michael D. Brown, 

Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security. 

[FR Doc. 04-2668 Filed 2-6-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
### §13867. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 103–322, title III, §31707, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1892; Pub. L. 110–177, title III, §301(b), Jan. 7, 2008, 121 Stat. 2539, which authorized appropriations for fiscal years 2008 to 2012, was omitted as obsolete.
| + NASA Homepage+ NASA en Español+ Marte en Español+ Mars Home+ MER Home**Summary****Images**
View the Mars Exploration Rover images.                      This image gallery will expand as the mission progresses.

See also Mars images by topical category (canyons, craters,                       etc.) in the main Mars                       Exploration Program's Gallery.
**Video**                     View the Mars Exploration Rover videos.                                          This video gallery will expand as the mission progresses.+ Freedom of Information Act+ The President's Management Agenda+ FY 2002 Agency Performance and                              accountability report+ NASA Privacy Statement, Disclaimer, and                              Accessiblity Certification+ Freedom to Manage                           Last Updated: + Comments and Questions |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
II 

Calendar No. 11 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 359 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 27, 2011 

Received 

FEBRUARY 14, 2011 

Read the first time 

FEBRUARY 15, 2011 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT 

To reduce Federal spending and the deficit by terminating 

taxpayer financing of presidential election campaigns and 

party conventions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF TAXPAYER FINANCING OF 

4 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION CAMPAIGNS. 

5 (a) TERMINATION OF DESIGNATION OF INCOME TAX

6 PAYMENTS.—Section 6096 of the Internal Revenue Code 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 359 PCS

1 of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following 

2 new subsection: 

3 ‘‘(d) TERMINATION.—This section shall not apply to 

4 taxable years beginning after December 31, 2009.’’. 

5 (b) TERMINATION OF FUND AND ACCOUNT.— 

6 (1) TERMINATION OF PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

7 CAMPAIGN FUND.— 

8 (A) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 95 of subtitle 

9 H of such Code is amended by adding at the 

10 end the following new section: 

11 ‘‘SEC. 9014. TERMINATION. 

12 ‘‘The provisions of this chapter shall not apply with 

13 respect to any presidential election (or any presidential 

14 nominating convention) after the date of the enactment 

15 of this section, or to any candidate in such an election.’’. 

16 (B) TRANSFER OF EXCESS FUNDS TO GEN17 ERAL FUND.—Section 9006 of such Code is 

18 amended by adding at the end the following 

19 new subsection: 

20 ‘‘(d) TRANSFER OF FUNDS REMAINING AFTER TER21 MINATION.—The Secretary shall transfer all amounts in 

22 the fund after the date of the enactment of this section 

23 to the general fund of the Treasury, to be used only for 

24 reducing the deficit.’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 359 PCS

1 (2) TERMINATION OF ACCOUNT.—Chapter 96 

2 of subtitle H of such Code is amended by adding at 

3 the end the following new section: 

4 ‘‘SEC. 9043. TERMINATION. 

5 ‘‘The provisions of this chapter shall not apply to any 

6 candidate with respect to any presidential election after 

7 the date of the enactment of this section.’’. 

8 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.— 

9 (1) The table of sections for chapter 95 of sub10 title H of such Code is amended by adding at the 

11 end the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 9014. Termination.’’. 

12 (2) The table of sections for chapter 96 of sub13 title H of such Code is amended by adding at the 

14 end the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 9043. Termination.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 26, 

2011. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 11 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 359 

AN ACT 

To reduce Federal spending and the deficit by tertion campaigns and party conventions. minating taxpayer financing of presidential elecFEBRUARY 15, 2011 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS