alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 222 (Friday, November 16, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 68771]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-27979]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9006-1]

Environmental Impacts Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/.
Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements
Filed 11/05/2012 Through 11/09/2012
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As of October 1, 2012, EPA will not accept 
paper copies or CDs of EISs for filing purposes; all submissions on or 
after October 1, 2012 must be made through e-NEPA.
    While this system eliminates the need to submit paper or CD copies 
to EPA to meet filing requirements, electronic submission does not 
change requirements for distribution of EISs for public review and 
comment. To begin using e-NEPA, you must first register with EPA's 
electronic reporting site--https://cdx.epa.gov/epa_home.asp

EIS No. 20120361, Final EIS, BR, UT, Narrows Project, Development of a 
Supplemental Water Supply for Agricultural and Municipal Water Use, 
Sanpete County, UT, Review Period Ends: 12/17/2012, Contact: Peter 
Crookston 801-379-1152.
EIS No. 20120362, Draft EIS, BLM, CA, Casa Diablo IV Geothermal 
Development Project, Mono County, CA, Comment Period Ends: 01/15/2013, 
Contact: Collin Reinhardt 760-872-5024.
EIS No. 20120364, Draft EIS, BLM, WY, Gas Hills In-Situ Recovery 
Uranium Project, Fremont and Natrona Counties, WY, Comment Period Ends: 
12/31/2012, Contact: Kristin Yannone 307-332-8400.
EIS No. 20120365, Final EIS, USACE, CA, Pier S Marine Terminal 
Development and Back Channel Improvements, Los Angeles County, CA, 
Review Period Ends: 12/17/2012, Contact: John W. Markham 805-585-2150.

    Dated: November 13, 2012.
Cliff Rader,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2012-27979 Filed 11-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
### SUBCHAPTER XXI—STATE CHILDREN'S HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM
### §12611. Purpose

It is the purpose of this division to authorize the operation of, and support for, residential and other service programs that combine the best practices of civilian service with the best aspects of military service, including leadership and team building, to meet national and community needs. The needs to be met under such programs include those needs related to—

(1) natural and other disasters;

(2) infrastructure improvement;

(3) environmental stewardship and conservation;

(4) energy conservation; and

(5) urban and rural development.

(Pub. L. 101–610, title I, §151, formerly §195, as added Pub. L. 102–484, div. A, title X, §1092(a)(1), Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2522; renumbered §151, Pub. L. 103–82, title I, §104(b), Sept. 21, 1993, 107 Stat. 840; amended Pub. L. 111–13, title I, §1501, Apr. 21, 2009, 123 Stat. 1521.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 12653 of this title prior to renumbering by Pub. L. 103–82, §104(b).

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 12611, Pub. L. 101–610, title I, §160, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3157, authorized Commission to make grants to Directors of Peace Corps and ACTION to carry out training and educational benefits demonstration programs, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–82, §104(a).

#### Amendments

2009—Pub. L. 111–13 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section provided that the purpose of this division was to authorize the establishment of a Civilian Community Corps to provide a basis for certain determinations.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2009 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–13 effective Oct. 1, 2009, see section 6101(a) of Pub. L. 111–13, set out as a note under section 4950 of this title.
### SUBCHAPTER VI—ADMINISTRATION AND COORDINATION
EXHIBIT 32
----------




          CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
          --------------------------------------------------


     The following statement is provided by the undersigned with respect
to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be
deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 or any other securities law:

     Each of the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on
Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of KAANAPALI LAND, LLC.




    By: /s/  Gary Nickele               By: /s/  Gailen J. Hull
        ---------------------------         ---------------------------
        Gary Nickele                        Gailen J. Hull
        Chief Executive Officer             Chief Financial Officer and
                                            Chief Accounting Officer
§ 1205.1 Scope of the standard. ( a ) *General.* This subpart A of part 1205 is a consumer product safety standard which prescribes safety requirements for certain walk-behind power lawn mowers, including labeling and performance requirements. The performance requirements of the standard apply to rotary mowers. The labeling requirements apply to both rotary and reel-type mowers. The standard is intended to reduce the risk of injury to consumers caused by contact, primarily of the foot and hand, with the rotating blade of the mower. A detailed discussion of the risk of injury and of the anticipated costs, benefits, and other factors associated with the standard is contained in § 1205.8 *Findings.*
( b ) *Scope.* ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, all walk-behind rotary and reel-type power lawn mowers manufactured or imported on or after the effective date of the standard are subject to the requirements of this standard if they are “consumer products”. “Walk behind power lawn mower” is defined as a grass cutting machine with a minimum cutting width of 12 in (305 mm) that employs an engine or motor as a power source. Section 3(a)(1) of the Consumer Product Safety Act (“CPSA”), 15 U.S.C. 2052(a)(1), defines the term *consumer product* as an “article, or component part thereof, produced or distributed ( i ) for sale to a consumer for use in or around a permanent or temporary household or residence, a school, in recreation, or otherwise, or
( ii ) for the personal use, consumption or enjoyment of a consumer in or around a permanent or temporary household or residence, a school, in recreation, or otherwise.” The term does not include products that are not customarily produced or distributed for sale to, or for the use or consumption by, or enjoyment of, a consumer.
( 2 ) It is unlawful to manufacture for sale, offer for sale, distribute in commerce, or import into the United States any product subject to this standard that is not in conformity with the standard. The Commission is not applying the standard to rental transactions or to the ultimate sale of used rental mowers by rental firms.
( c ) *Exclusions* — ( 1 ) *General.* Mowers that have all three of the following characteristics are not covered by the standard: ( i ) A cutting width of 30 in (762 mm) or greater,
( ii ) A weight of 200 lb (90.7 kg) or more, and
( iii ) For engine-powered mowers, an engine of 8 horsepower (6 kw) or more.
( 2 ) *Reel-type mowers.* Reel-type power lawn mowers need not meet the performance requirements of the standard but they must be labeled as required by § 1205.6.
NRC NEWS

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

CONTACT: Diane Screnci (610)337-5330/ e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan (610)337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

I-96-77

November 27,1996

Contact: Diane Screnci Neil A. Sheehan

NRC STAFF TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATIONS AT HADDAM NECK

AND MILLSTONE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled two predecisional enforcement conferences next week to discuss apparent violations of NRC

requirements at the Haddam Neck and Millstone plants in Connecticut.

The first enforcement conference, concerning Haddam Neck, will be held December 4 with officials of Connecticut Yankee Nuclear Power Company. The

second conference will be held the following day with officials of Northeast Utilities to discuss apparent violations at the Millstone Station.

Both enforcement conferences, which are open to the public for observation only, will begin at 9 a.m. each day in the Leland F. Sillin Training Center at

the Millstone site.

The apparent violations at Haddam Neck were identified during several NRC regular and special inspections, starting last November. The apparent

violations include errors in design basis documents, errors introduced by design changes, inadequate corrective actions, errors in evaluations required by

NRC regulations, and failure to update the Final Safety Analysis Report.

Violations were also found concerning the operability of equipment, including the containment air recirculation fans and the residual heat removal

system. Also to be discussed are emergency preparedness weaknesses, and findings of an Augmented Inspection Team which reviewed four events

which occurred over the Labor Day weekend.

The apparent violations at Millstone were found during numerous NRC inspections since October 1995. Those violations include failures to: make changes

properly to the facility, establish appropriate procedures, test equipment properly, take prompt and effective corrective actions, process nonconforming

materials properly, maintain records, provide proper event reports, provide accurate and complete information, update the Final Safety Analysis Report,

and implement design control measures properly.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference does not mean that the NRC has determined that a violation has occurred or that

enforcement action will be taken. Rather, the purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes and safety significance; to provide the licensee an

opportunity to point out any errors that may have been made in the NRC inspection report; and to enable the licensee to outline its proposed corrective

actions. No decision on the apparent violations will be made at this conference. Those decisions will be made by senior NRC officials at a later time.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 230 (Wednesday, December 1, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 69895]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26432]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by January 
3, 2005.
    Title and OMB Number: Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation 
Supplement (DFARS) Part 251, Use of Government Sources by Contractors, 
and related clauses in DFARS 252.251; OMB Control Number 0704-0252.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 3,500.
    Responses Per Respondent: 3.
    Annual Responses: 10,500.
    Average Burden Per Response: 30 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 5,250.
    Needs and Uses: This information collection requirement facilitates 
contractor use of government supply sources. Contractors must provide 
certain information to the government to verify their authorization to 
purchase from government supply sources or to use Interagency Fleet 
Management System vehicles and related services.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit and not-for-profit 
institutions.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jacqueline Zeiher. Written comments and 
recommendations on the proposed information collection should be sent 
to Ms. Zeiher at the Office of Management and Budget, Desk Officer for 
DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings. Written requests for 
copies of the information collection proposal should be sent to Ms. 
Toppings, WHS/ESCD/Information Management Division, 1225 South Clark 
Street, Suite 504, Arlington, VA 22202-4326.

    Dated: November 22, 2004.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 04-26432 Filed 11-30-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
#### George W. Miller v. Victor K. Glass.

*Filed at Ottawa November 13, 1886.*

Bill of *exceptions—when necessary—presumption from its absence.*Where the record contains no bill of exceptions showing the evidence heard on the trial of a cause, it will be presumed that the evidence was ample to sustain the judgment of the court below. It devolves on the party alleging error to make it appear.

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;— heard in that court on writ of error to the Superior Court of Cook county.

Mr. George W. Miller, *pro se.*

Mr. William Garnett, Jr., for the appellee.

Per Curiam :

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Court, affirming a judgment of the Superior Court of Cook county. It is claimed that the debt upon which the judgment was founded was paid and discharged before the judgment was rendered. The record contains no bill of exceptions, and we have no means of knowing what the proof was in the Superior Court, where the judgment was rendered. We will, however, in the absence of a bill of exceptions showing what the evidence was, presume that the evidence was ample to sustain the judgment. It always devolves upon a party alleging error, to make it appear.

No error whatever appears upon this record, and the judgment will be affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         103,374                 127,527
<SECURITIES>                                     4,792                  14,889
<RECEIVABLES>                                  145,911                  88,553
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,355                   1,376
<INVENTORY>                                    277,371                 250,492
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               699,189                 616,751
<PP&E>                                         838,376                 527,710
<DEPRECIATION>                                 179,210                 147,971
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,471,170               1,074,701
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          358,250                 232,286
<BONDS>                                        804,390                 582,721
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     260,643                 218,261
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,471,470               1,074,701
<SALES>                                        802,707                 588,399
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               804,579                 592,221
<CGS>                                          726,155                 497,740
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  727,080                 598,147
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,159                  12,284
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,532                  13,623
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 32,699                (42,482)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,073)                     167
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             33,772                (42,649)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,887                    (25)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    35,659                (42,674)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SRM-SECY-15-0136: Denial of Petitions for Rulemaking Requesting to Rescind Regulations that Make Generic Determinations Regarding the Environmental Impacts of Spent Fuel Storage & Disposal When Considering Nuclear Power Reactor License Applications

Accession Number: ML16082A106

Date Released: Friday, May 20, 2016

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML16082A105 - SRM-SECY-15-0136: Denial of Petitions for Rulemaking Requesting to Rescind Regulations that Make Generic Determinations Regarding the Environmental Impacts of Spent Fuel Storage & Disposal When Considering Nuclear Power Reactor License Applications. (1 page(s), 3/21/2016)
    - ML16082A118 - SRM-SECY-15-0136: Enclosure 1 - Denial of Petitions for Rulemaking Requesting to Rescind Regulations that Make Generic Determinations Regarding the Environmental Impacts of Spent Fuel Storage & Disposal When Considering Nuclear Power Reactor... (35 page(s), 3/21/2016)
    - ML16082A123 - SRM-SECY-15-0136: Enclosure 2 - Denial of Petitions for Rulemaking Requesting to Rescind Regulations that Make Generic Determinations Regarding the Environmental Impacts of Spent Fuel Storage & Disposal When Considering Nuclear Power Reactor... (2 page(s), 3/21/2016)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Benacquista Galleries, Inc.
(the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report"), I, James Price,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report
                  fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
                  condition and results of operations of the Company as of and
                  for the period covered by the Report.


/s/ James Price
-------------------
James Price
Chief Executive Officer
Duly Authorized Officer and Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer

Date: December 22, 2004
No. 15-072 November 6, 2015

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200

NRC Highlights Independence, Technical Expertise

at White House Summit on Nuclear Energy

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission, participating in today’s White House Summit on Nuclear 

Energy, highlighted its independent role in technically evaluating reactor designs to ensure public 

health and safety. The NRC also committed to providing the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Gateway 

for Accelerating Innovation in Nuclear (GAIN) program with up-to-date information.

“The NRC is familiar with the innovative approaches to nuclear power plants discussed today,” 

said NRC Chairman Stephen Burns. “We look forward to reviewing evidence to support the safety case 

for these designs’ fuels, operation and emergency systems. We also look forward to working with DOE 

to ensure today’s innovators are well-versed in the path towards earning regulatory approval.”

As part of the summit, the NRC, consistent with its role as an independent safety and security 

regulator, committed to providing DOE with accurate, current information on the NRC’s regulations 

and licensing processes. DOE’s GAIN program will help prospective advanced nuclear technology 

applicants understand and navigate the regulatory process for licensing new reactor technology. 

The NRC also committed to partnering with DOE to hold the Second Advanced Non-Light 

Water Reactors Workshop in spring 2016, building on the successful first workshop held in September. 

The second workshop will explore options for increased efficiency, from both a technical and 

regulatory perspective, in the safe development and deployment of innovative reactor technologies. 

Workshop topics could include examining both near-term and longer-term opportunities to test, 

demonstrate and construct prototype advanced reactors, and evaluating the most appropriate licensing 

processes.
----

hib

| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      May 11, 2009  | By:    | /s/      Chang H. Ahn        |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|                           |   | Chang      H. Ahn,           |   |
|                           |   | Chief      Executive Officer |   |

| * | This      Certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and      Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States      Code, and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the      Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This      Certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any      filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as      otherwise stated in such filing. |
|---|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----