alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 03-14-00795-CV

Jennifer Samaniego,

Third Court of Appeals

Austin, Texas

Appellant,

v.

Alieda Silguero, et al.,

Appellees.

Samaniego’s Motion for Relief from Technical Failure 

or, in the Alternative, for Extension

The Adobe Acrobat software of appellant Jennifer Samaniego’s 

counsel crashed as he was trying to finish preparing her brief. He had to 

restart his computer to get Acrobat to restart properly. He had to recover the Word version of his brief from his computers catalog of recovered files, recover the last-saved version of the brief from Dropbox, 

and run a blackline comparison of the two to ensure that he had not lost 

parts of the brief in the crash. And, finally, he had to convert the brief 

to PDF, attach its appendix, and upload it to the electronic-filing service 

provider, after which he filed it with the Court.

By then, it was not quite 12:20 a.m. on May 12. But the brief was due 

on May 11, and the Court rejected the filing. Samaniego prays that the 

Court relieve this technical failure1 by accepting her re-submitted brief 

and considering it to have been accepted timely.2 In the alternative, Sa-

 

1

 Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(C)(5).

2

 The clerk pointed out that part of the brief was missing page numbers. The resubmitted brief includes them. 

ACCEPTED

03-14-00795-CV

5565638

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

6/5/2015 2:14:23 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/5/2015 2:14:23 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
Case 03-14-00795-CV, Samaniego v. Silguero Page 2 of 3

Samaniego’s Motion for Relief or Extension

maniego prays that the court grant her a final extension so that the corrected brief is considered timely filed.3 If the Court reaches it, this alternative request would be Samaniego’s third, the previous two being 

granted for, respectively, unfamiliarity with the Court’s procedures and 

illness. Neither the relief nor the extension would prejudice Silguero, 

for whom summary judgment has been granted and who receives nothing but extra time to consider Samaniego’s arguments.

Samaniego prays that the Court except for corrected brief and considerate to have been timely filed. She further prays for all other relief 

to which she may be entitled.

Respectfully submitted,

The Olson Firm PLLC

/s/ Leif A. Olson

Leif A. Olson

leif@olsonappeals.com

State Bar No. 24032801

PMB 188

4830 Wilson Road, Suite 300

Humble, Texas 77396

(281) 849-8382

Counsel for Samaniego

Certificate of Conference

On June 5, 2015, Nadia Ramkissoon, counsel for the appellees, informed me that she opposes the relief sought.

 3 Tex. R. App. P. 10.5.
Case 03-14-00795-CV, Samaniego v. Silguero Page 3 of 3

Samaniego’s Motion for Relief or Extension

/s/ Leif A. Olson

Certificate of Service

On June 5, 2015, I served this Samaniego’s Motion for Relief from 

Technical Failure or, in the Alternative, for Extension by electronic service 

upon:

Nadia Ramkissoon

nadia.ramkissoon@farmersinsurance.com

Clark, Price & Trevino

1701 Directors Blvd., Suite 920

Austin, Texas 78744

Counsel for Appellees

/s/ Leif A. Olson
### Mr. Barry

### R Stephens Director UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 4 ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 61 FORSYTH STREET ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960 

# JUN 1 9 2Dt4

TennesseeDivision ofAir Pollution Control 312 Rosa L. Parks Avenue 15th Floor Nashville, Tennessee 37243 DearMr. Stephens: OnMarch 17,2014, we received a revision to theTennessee State Implementation Plan submitted by your agency onMarch 13, 2014. Thatrevision pertains to Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements for section 110(a)(2) (A-C), D(i)(II), D(ii), (E-H), and (J-M) for the 2010 nitrogen dioxide standards. We have completed ourreview ofthis submission and have determined that all oftherequired administrative and technical components for these aforementioned elements are present. Consistent with CAA timeframes, we will review the submission for approvability priorto preparing a rulemaking notice to take action on the revision. Ifyou have questions about this letter, contact me or Lynorae Benjamin, Chiefofthe Regulatory Development Section, at (404) 562-9040. Sincerely,

Air, Pesticides and Taxies

Management Division

Internet Address (URLI • http://www.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 30% Postconsumer)
#### § 1461.1 Scope and application.

In accordance with the Portable Fuel Container Safety Act of 2020 (PFCSA), portable fuel containers must comply with the requirements specified in § 1461.3, which are considered to be consumer product safety rules.
# Documents in Support of a Significant New Use Rule for Premanufacture Notice (PMN) P-15-0115

Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2015-0220

# Table of Contents

1. Sanitized SAT Report for P-15-0115 2. Sanitized Engineering Report for P-15-0115 3. Sanitized Exposure Report for P-15-0115

# Sanitized SAT Report for P-15-0115Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg ≥ mo Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong PBT Potential: P3B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

Health : Health Summary: Absorption nil thru skin based on physical/chemical p roperties; p oor thru lungs based on physical/chemical properties; and poor thru GI tract based on the submitted 28-d toxicity test data. Concern for systemic toxicity and effects to the liver and GI tract based on submitted test data for Also concern for dermal sensitization based on p henols. Test Data: (-) Salmonella with and without activation; (-) E. coli with and without activation; (-) for chromosome aberrations in CHL cells with and without activation; rat oral LD0 = 2000 mg/kg; no eye irritation in rabbits; no skin irritation in rabbits

P15-116: (-) Salmonella with and without activation; (-) E. coli with and without activation; (-) for chromosome aberrations in CHL cells with and without activation; rat oral LD0 = 2000 mg/kg; no eye irritation in rabbits; no skin irritation in rabbits; rat 28-day oral NOEL = 400 mg/kg (highest dose tested)

(-) Salmonella with and without activation; (-) E. coli with and without activation; (-) for chromosome aberrations in CHL cells with and without activation; rat oral LD0 = 2000 mg/kg; no skin irritation in rabbits; mild eye irritation in rabbits; rat 28-day oral NOEL = 40 mg/kg, effects on the liver, GI tract and general systemic toxicity at 200 mg/kg and higher

Ecotox :

Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 * 3.5 daphnid 48-h LC50 * 0.93 green algal 96-h EC50 * 3.7 fish

_ chronic value * 0.048 analog daphnid

_ chronic value * 0.093

algal

_ chronic value * 0.925

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for ; SAR chemical class = with 2.6%/1.6%<500 and 29%/30%<1000; solid with mp 65/70 C (P); S = 0.005 mg/L at 25 C (P); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% activeSARs SAR Class Ecotox Category

Ecotox Factors Comments:

SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916

# Sanitized Engineering Report for P-15-0115

# Sanitized Exposure Report for P-15-0115
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 (the Form 10-QSB) of Surrey Bancorp (the Company), we, Edward C. Ashby, III, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, and Mark H.Towe, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:



(a) the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(b) the
information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Form 10-QSB.



|    |  |                                                |  |                      
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Edward C. Ashby, III                       |  | Date: August 11, 2005
|    |  | Edward C. Ashby, III.                          |  |                      
|    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer          |  |                      
|    |  |                                               
|By: |  | /s/ Mark H. Towe                               |  | Date: August 11, 2005
|    |  | Mark H. Towe                                   |  |                      
|    |  | Sr. Vice-President and Chief Financial
Officer |  |                      



63
§ 1420.3 Requirements for four-wheel ATVs. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 4195 , Jan. 23, 2024.
Cross Reference
Link to a correction of the above amendment published at 89 FR 5767 , Jan. 30, 2024.
( a ) Each ATV shall comply with all applicable provisions of the American National Standard for Four-Wheel All-Terrain Vehicles (ANSI/SVIA 1-2017), ANSI-approved on June 8, 2017. The Director of the Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. You may obtain a copy from Specialty Vehicle Institute of America, 2 Jenner, Suite 150, Irvine, CA 92618-3806; telephone: 949-727-3727 ext. 3023; *www.svia.org .* You may inspect a copy at the Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Room 820, 4330 East-West Highway, Bethesda, MD. 20814, telephone: 301-504-7923, or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html .*
( b ) Each ATV must be subject to an ATV action plan filed with the Commission before August 14, 2008 or subsequently filed with and approved by the Commission, and shall bear a label certifying such compliance and identifying the manufacturer, importer or private labeler and the ATV action plan to which it is subject.
( c ) The ATV manufacturer or distributor shall be in compliance with all provisions of the applicable ATV action plan.
[73 FR 67386, Nov. 14, 2008, as amended at 77 FR 12200, Feb. 29, 2012; 83 FR 8340, Feb. 27, 2018]
#### Karen Greene *v.*Richard Greene

*Charles T. Busek,*in support of the petition.

*Robert K. Lesser,*in opposition.

Decided April 5, 1988

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 13 Conn. App. 512, is denied.
#### § 460.6 “Representative thickness” testing.

All tests except reflective insulation tests must be done at a representative thickness for every thickness shown in a label, fact sheet, ad, or other promotional material. “Representative thickness” means a thickness at which the R-value per unit will vary no more than plus or minus 2% with increases in thickness. However, if the thickness shown in your label, fact sheet, ad, or promotional material is less than the representative thickness, then you can test the insulation at the thickness shown.

[44 FR 50242, Aug. 27, 1979, as amended at 84 FR 20789, May 13, 2019]
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Declaration of Disaster #3650]
 As a result of the President's major disaster declaration for Public Assistance on October 1, 2004 and subsequent amendments adding Individual Assistance and establishing the incident period on November 16, 2004, I find that Allegany, Broome, Cattaraugus, Madison, Monroe, Niagara, Oneida, Onondaga, Orange, Orleans, Steuben, Sullivan, Ulster, and Wayne Counties in the State of New York constitute a disaster area due to damages caused by severe storms and flooding occurring on August 13, 2004 and continuing through September 16, 2004. Applications for loans for physical damage as a result of this disaster may be filed until the close of business on January 18, 2005 and for economic injury until the close of business on August 16, 2005 at the address listed below or other locally announced locations: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 1 Office, 360 Rainbow Blvd., South 3rd Fl., Niagara Falls, NY 14303-1192. In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small businesses located in the following contiguous counties may be filed until the specified date at the above location: Cayuga, Chautauqua, Chemung, Chenango, Columbia, Cortland, Delaware, Dutchess, Erie, Genesee, Greene, Herkimer, Lewis, Livingston, Ontario, Oswego, Otsego, Putnam, Rockland, Schuyler, Seneca, Tioga, Westchester, Wyoming, and Yates in the State of New York; Passaic and Sussex Counties in the State of New Jersey; and McKean, Pike, Potter, Susquehanna, Tioga, Warren, and Wayne Counties in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The interest rates are: PercentFor Physical Damage:Homeowners with credit available elsewhere
6.375Homeowners without credit available elsewhere
3.187Businesses with credit available elsewhere
5.800Businesses and non-profit organizations without credit available elsewhere
2.900Others (including non-profit organizations) with credit available elsewhere
4.875For Economic Injury:Businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without credit available elsewhere
2.900
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 365006. For economic injury the number is 9AJ500 for New York; 9AK100 for New Jersey; and 9AK200 for Pennsylvania. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008). Dated: November 17, 2004. Herbert L. Mitchell, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 04-26013 Filed 11-23-04; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 20 (Wednesday, January 30, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 481]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00289]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Natural Experiments and 
Pragmatic Research.
    Date: February 11, 2019.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Michele L. Barnard, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, 
Room 7353, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-2542, (301) 
594-8898, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#91f3f0e3fff0e3f5fcd1f4e9e5e3f0bffff8f5f5fabffff8f9bff6fee7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5b393a29353a293f361b3e232f293a7535323f3f3075353233753c342d">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in 
advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of 
December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 24, 2019.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-00289 Filed 1-29-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.2


Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer


of CNA Financial Corporation


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350


(As adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of CNA Financial Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:


|  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|• | the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|  |                                                                                                                                                     
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|• | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:November 3, 2015By/s/ D. Craig MenseD. Craig MenseChief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### Consolidated Service Stations, Inc., Respondent, v. Cities Service Oil Company, Appellant.

Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and Mac-Crate, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 592.]
No. 16-001 January 6, 2016

CONTACT: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200

NRC Grants Weapons Pre-Emption Authority to Nuclear Facilities in Two States

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has granted pre-emption authority to nuclear facilities in 

New York and California, allowing their security forces to possess and use certain firearms and related 

devices despite local, state or federal laws and regulations restricting their use.

The facilities are the Indian Point, James A. FitzPatrick, Nine Mile Point and R.E. Ginna 

nuclear power plants in New York and the San Onofre and Diablo Canyon nuclear power plants in 

California, as well as their dry cask spent fuel storage facilities. 

The Energy Policy Act of 2005 gave the NRC authority to permit security forces at 

NRC-licensed facilities to possess and use certain firearms, ammunition and large-capacity ammunition 

feeding devices in the performance of their official duties regardless of local, state or federal 

restrictions on their use. This “pre-emption authority” became effective with the NRC’s 2009 

publication of guidelines on the use of firearms at NRC-licensed facilities, which were approved by the 

Attorney General.

Pre-emption authority helps ensure the facilities can maintain capabilities described in their 

current NRC-approved security plans. This authority is being granted through Orders and license 

amendments.
1/19/23, 9:41 AM Wayback Machine

https://web.archive.org/web/20041110095322/http:/www.census.gov/industry/m20a9613.txt 1/1

The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20041110095322/http://www.census.gov/industry/m20a96...

CURRENT INDUSTRIAL REPORT

FLOUR MILLING - SUMMARY 1996

M20A(96)-13

ISSUED APRIL 15, 1997

CONTACT: RONANNE VINSON 301-457-4647

Table 1. SUMMARY OF COMMERCIAL WHEAT MILLING PRODUCTION: 1984 TO 1996

 Wheat flour Wheat ground Millfeed Average pounds per cwt.

 production for flour Production sack of flour

(1000 cwt. (1000 (1000

 Year sacks) bushels) tons) Wheat Millfeed

1996 . . . . . . . . . . . . 397,776 878,070 7,042 132.4 35.4

1995 . . . . . . . . . . . . 388,689 869,296 7,144 134.2 36.8

1994 . . . . . . . . . . . . 392,519 884,707 7,186 135.2 36.6

1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . 387,419 871,408 6,963 135.0 35.9

1992 . . . . . . . . . . . . 370,829 833,339 6,707 134.8 36.2

1991 . . . . . . . . . . . . 362,311 808,966 6,436 134.0 35.5

1990 . . . . . . . . . . . . 354,348 788,186 6,109 133.5 34.5

1989 . . . . . . . . . . . . 342,762 761,021 6,072 133.2 35.4

1988 . . . . . . . . . . . . 344,154 769,699 6,163 134.2 35.8

1987 . . . . . . . . . . . . 341,565 767,507 6,260 134.8 36.7

1986 . . . . . . . . . . . . 326,316 737,537 5,799 135.6 35.5

1985 . . . . . . . . . . . . 313,815 700,151 5,556 133.9 35.4

1984 . . . . . . . . . . . . 299,832 675,271 5,426 135.1 36.2

Table 2. COMMERCIAL WHEAT MILLING PRODUCTION, BY MONTH: 1996 AND 1995

 Daily

 Wheat flour Wheat ground 24-HOUR 

Average pounds per cwt.

 production for flour Millfeed capacity in 

Wheat flour sack of flour

(1000 cwt. (1000 Production wheat flour(1) mill

stocks(1)

 Month sacks) bushels) (tons) (1000 cwt.) 

(1000 cwt.) Wheat Millfeed

 1996

 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 397,776 878,070 7,041,882 (X) 

(X) 132.4 35.4

December . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31,970 71,326 568,008 1,411 

\r6,671 133.9 35.5

November . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33,056 73,694 583,262 (NA) 

(NA) 133.8 35.3

October . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37,495 82,670 648,846 (NA) 

(NA) 132.3 34.6

September . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34,645 75,099 593,831 1,406 

\r6,350 130.1 34.3

August . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35,579 77,406 618,335 (NA) 

(NA) 130.5 34.8

July . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33,909 73,619 593,353 (NA) 

(NA) 130.3 35.0

June . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30,636 67,655 542,867 1,405 

\r6,400 132.5 35.4

M 33 203 72 605 592 380 (NA)
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Paul P. Muni. Laube’s Old Spain, Inc., Appellant; Michael J. Murphy, as Acting Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

All concur.