alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-16-0033:  Final Draft Rulemaking - 10 CFR 50.46c:  Emergency Core Cooling Systems Performance During Loss-of-Coolant Accidents.

Accession Number: ML15238A947

Date Released: Monday, April 4, 2016

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML15238A933 - SECY-16-0033: Draft Final Rule-Performance-Based Emergency Core Cooling System Requirements and Related Fuel Cladding Acceptance Criteria (RIN 3150-AH42). (15 page(s), 3/16/2016)
    - ML15238B016 - SECY-16-0033:  Federal Register Notice, Draft Final Rulemaking:  Performance-Based Emergency Core Cooling Systems Cladding Acceptance Criteria (Encl. 1). (156 page(s), 2/16/2016)
    - ML15238B193 - SECY-16-0033:  NRC Staff Responses to Public Comments on Proposed Rule 10 CFR 50.46c (Encl. 2) (110 page(s), 3/16/2016)
    - ML16028A388 - SECY-16-0033:  Non-concurrence Package NCP-2015-010 (Encl. 3). (8 page(s), 3/16/2016)
    - ML15323A122 - SECY-16-0033:  Regulatory Analysis for Emergency Core Cooling System Performance during Loss-of-Coolant Accidents Final Rule  (10 CFR 50.46c) (Encl. 4). (104 page(s), 3/16/2016)
    - ML16048A522 - Draft Final Rule 10 CFR 50.46c, "Emergency Core Cooling System Performance During Loss-of-Coolant Accidents (LOCA)" and Associated Regulatory Guides (10 page(s), 2/23/2016)
    - ML16040A213 - SECY-16-0033:  LTR-16-0093-1 - NRC Response to ACRS re:  Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Section 50.46c "Performance-Based Emergency Core Cooling System Requirements and Related Fuel Cladding Acceptance Criteria (Encl. 6) (3 page(s), 3/16/2016)
    - ML16070A197 - SECY-16-0033:  Final Draft Rulemaking - NRC Evaluation of the Nuclear Energy Institute's February 25, 2016, Proposal for a "Conditional Compliance Schedule" for Final 10 CFR 50.46c Rulemaking (Encl. 7). (2 page(s), 3/16/2016)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### § 240.7 Services or facilities.

The terms “services” and “facilities” have not been exactly defined by the statute or in decisions. One requirement, however, is that the services or facilities be used primarily to promote the resale of the seller's product by the customer. Services or facilities that relate primarily to the original sale are covered by section 2(a). The following list provides some examples—the list is not exhaustive—of promotional services and facilities covered by sections 2(d) and (e):

Cooperative advertising;

Handbills;

Demonstrators and demonstrations;

Catalogues;

Cabinets;

Displays;

Prizes or merchandise for conducting promotional contests;

Special packaging, or package sizes; and

Online advertising.

# Example 1:

A seller offers a supermarket chain an allowance of $500 per store to stock a new packaged food product and find space for it on the supermarket's shelves and a further allowance of $300 per store for placement of the new product on prime display space, an aisle endcap. The $500 allowance relates primarily to the initial sale of the product to the supermarket chain, and therefore should be assessed under section 2(a) of the Act. In contrast, the $300 allowance for endcap display relates primarily to the resale of the product by the supermarket chain, and therefore should be assessed under section 2(d).

# Example 2:

During the Halloween season, a seller of multi-packs of individually wrapped candy bars offers to provide those multi-packs to retailers in Halloween-themed packaging. The primary purpose of the special packaging is to promote customers' resale of the candy bars. Therefore, the special packaging is a promotional service or facility covered by section 2(d) or 2(e) of the Act.

# Example 3:

A seller of liquid laundry detergent ordinarily packages its detergent in containers having a circular footprint. A customer asks the seller to furnish the detergent to it in special packaging having a square footprint, so that the customer can more efficiently warehouse and transship the detergent. Because the purpose of the special packaging is primarily to promote the original sale of the detergent to the customer and not its resale by the customer, the special packaging is not a promotional service or facility covered by section 2(d) or 2(e) of the Act.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 337 

To amend Public Law 111–321 (Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Repeal Act of 2010) 

to impose an additional condition on the repeal of the policy codified 

as section 654 of title 10, United States Code. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 19, 2011 

Mr. HUNTER (for himself, Mr. BILBRAY, Mr. LUETKEMEYER, Mr. DAVIS of 

Kentucky, Mr. CHAFFETZ, Mr. GIBBS, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. FRANKS of 

Arizona, Mr. PEARCE, Mr. WEST, Mr. ROGERS of Alabama, Mr. FLEMING, Mr. BARTLETT, Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. 

HUELSKAMP, Mr. KLINE, Mr. MANZULLO, and Mr. GINGREY of Georgia) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend Public Law 111–321 (Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Repeal Act of 2010) to impose an additional condition 

on the repeal of the policy codified as section 654 of 

title 10, United States Code. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Restore Military Read5 iness Act of 2011’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 337 IH

1 SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL CONDITION ON REPEAL OF DON’T ASK, 

2 DON’T TELL POLICY. 

3 Effective as of December 22, 2010, and as if included 

4 therein as enacted, section 2(b) of Public Law 111–321 

5 (124 Stat. 3516) is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(3) The Chief of Staff of the Army, the Chief 

8 of Naval Operations, the Commandant of the Marine 

9 Corps, and the Chief of Staff of the Air Force each 

10 submit to the congressional defense committees the 

11 officer’s written certification that repeal of section 

12 654 of title 10, United States Code, will not degrade 

13 the readiness, effectiveness, cohesion, and morale of 

14 combat arms units and personnel of the Armed 

15 Force under the officer’s jurisdiction engaged in 

16 combat, deployed to a combat theater, or preparing 

17 for deployment to a combat theater.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-16-0112:  Annual Report of Committee to Review Generic Requirements Review Activities

Accession Number: ML16118A238

Date Released: Wednesday, October 19, 2016

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML16160A311 - SECY-16-0112:  Annual Report of Committee to Review Generic Requirements Review Activities (8 page(s), 9/29/2016)
    - ML16160A317 - SECY-16-0112:  Enclosure - Annual Report of Committee to Review Generic Requirements Review Activities (2 page(s), 9/29/2016)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eugene Turner, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 117]

Motion for writ of error coram nobis denied. Present — Scudder, J.P., Kehoe, Gorski and Green, JJ.
### §1201. Authorization of appropriations

For the purpose of enabling each State to furnish financial assistance, as far as practicable under the conditions in such State, to needy individuals who are blind, there is hereby authorized to be appropriated for each fiscal year a sum sufficient to carry out the purposes of this subchapter. The sums made available under this section shall be used for making payments to States which have submitted, and had approved by the Secretary of Health and Human Services, State plans for aid to the blind.

(Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title X, §1001, 49 Stat. 645; Aug. 28, 1950, ch. 809, title III, pt. 6, §361(b), 64 Stat. 558; 1953 Reorg. Plan No. 1, §§5, 8, eff. Apr. 11, 1953, 18 F.R. 2053, 67 Stat. 631; Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 836, title III, §313(a), 70 Stat. 849; Pub. L. 87–543, title I, §104(c)(3), July 25, 1962, 76 Stat. 186; Pub. L. 96–88, title V, §509(b), Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 695; Pub. L. 97–35, title XXI, §2184(c)(1), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 817.)

#### Repeal of Section

Pub. L. 92–603, title III, §303(a), (b), Oct. 30, 1972, 86 Stat. 1484, provided that this section is repealed effective Jan. 1, 1974, except with respect to Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1981—Pub. L. 97–35 struck out "and of encouraging each State, as far as practicable under such conditions, to furnish rehabilitation and other services to help such individuals attain or retain capability for self-support and self-care" after "who are blind".

1962—Pub. L. 87–543 inserted "to furnish rehabilitation and other services" before "to help such individuals" and "or retain capability for" after "attain".

1956—Act Aug. 1, 1956, restated purpose to include assistance to individuals to attain self-support or self-care.

1950—Act Aug. 28, 1950, substituted "Federal Security Administrator" for "Social Security Board".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Secretary of Health and Human Services" substituted in text for "Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare" pursuant to section 509(b) of Pub. L. 96–88, which is classified to section 3508(b) of Title 20, Education.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of Federal Security Administrator transferred to Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare and all agencies of Federal Security Agency transferred to Department of Health, Education, and Welfare by section 5 of Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1953, set out as a note under section 3501 of this title. Federal Security Agency and office of Administrator abolished by section 8 of Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1953.
### Part IV—Repealed

Part related to service-learning impact study, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 113–188, title III, §301(a), Nov. 26, 2014, 128 Stat. 2018.
UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 

 February 5, 2016 

IN RESPONSE, PLEASE 

 REFER TO: M160205 

MEMORANDUM FOR: Brooke P. Clark, Director 

Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication 

FROM: Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS – AFFIRMATION SESSION, 9:30 A.M., 

FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 2016, COMMISSIONERS' 

CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH, 

ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND (OPEN TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE) 

I. SECY-15-0134 – FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. (TURKEY POINT UNITS 6 & 7); 

CITY OF MIAMI’S APPEAL OF LBP-15-19 

The Commission (with Commissioner Baran dissenting) approved a Memorandum and Order 

responding to the City of Miami’s appeal of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board’s decision in 

LBP-15-19, which denied the City’s petition to intervene as a party in the combined license 

proceeding for Turkey Point Units 6 and 7. The Memorandum and Order denies review without 

prejudice. 

(Subsequently, on February 5, 2016, the Secretary signed the Memorandum and Order.) 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 EDO 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCAA 

 OCA 

 OIG 

 OPA 

 ODs, RAs, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350
by Chief Financial Officer

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of VSB Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, Raffaele
M. Branca, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                     |                          | 
|-------------------- | ------------------------ | 
|Date: May
  14, 2008 |                         
|                     |                         
|                     | /s/ Raffaele
  M. Branca
|                     |                          | 
|                     | Raffaele M.
  Branca    
|                     | President,
  CEO and CFO

A signed
original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

25

---
#### § 1304.4 Consumer patching compounds as banned hazardous products.

On the basis that airborne asbestos fibers present the hazards of cancer, including lung cancer and mesothelioma to the public, consumer patching compounds containing intentionally-added, respirable free-form asbestos, which have been manufactured or initially introduced into commerce after January 16, 1978, are banned hazardous products. In addition, all other consumer patching compounds containing intentionally-added, respirable free-form asbestos, no matter when manufactured or initially introduced into commerce, are banned hazardous products after June 11, 1978.
#### Olga Duca et al., Appellants, v. Vincent M. Amoroso, Respondent.

No opinion. Appeal from order denying the motion of appellant Olga Duca to set the verdict aside dismissed, without costs. There does not appear to be such an order. Present — -Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.
#### Charles Branderslev, Plaintiff in Error, v. Anna Branderslev, Defendant in Error.

Gen. No. 20,585.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Abstract of the Decision.

Divobce, § *45*
      ***
      *—when evidence sufficient to warrant dismissal of "bill for divorce on ground of impotency.*Evidence in suit for divorce on the ground of impotency examined and *held*to warrant a dismissal of the hill for want of equity.

Error to the Circuit Court of Cook county;, the Hon. Thomas G. Windes, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1914.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed March 8, 1915.

Statement of the Case.

Bill by Charles Branderslev against Anna Branderslev, for divorce on the ground of impotency 1

The evidence shows that defendant’s left hip joint is fixed whereby it is impossible for the parties to have sexual intercourse in the natural and normal way, but that by lying in a certain attitude, complete intercourse could be had. Defendant testified that her hymen had been ruptured by intercourse with complainant and the medical evidence showed the existence of the rupture.

From a decree dismissing the bill for want of equity, •complainant appeals.

McMahon & Cheney and J. Walter Nielsen, for plaintiff in error

Hugh O’Neill, for defendant in error.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice Baker

delivered the opinion of the court.
### §11448. Repealed. Pub. L. 107–95, §5(e)(4), Dec. 21, 2001, 115 Stat. 918

Section, Pub. L. 100–77, title VII, §738, July 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 530; Pub. L. 102–590, §11(a), Nov. 10, 1992, 106 Stat. 5141; Pub. L. 104–110, title I, §102(d)(1), Feb. 13, 1996, 110 Stat. 769; Pub. L. 104–275, title VI, §601(b), Oct. 9, 1996, 110 Stat. 3344; Pub. L. 105–114, title II, §203(c)(1), Nov. 21, 1997, 111 Stat. 2288, related to programs to expedite the reintegration of homeless veterans into the labor force.
#### § 1203.2 Purpose and basis.

The purpose and basis of this standard is to reduce the likelihood of serious injury and death to bicyclists resulting from impacts to the head, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 6001-6006.
###### Editorial Note on Part 922

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

#### § 922.187 Interagency Cooperation.

Under section 304(d) of the NMSA, Federal agency actions internal or external to a national marine sanctuary, including private activities authorized by licenses, leases, or permits, that are likely to destroy, cause the loss of, or injure any sanctuary resource are subject to consultation with the Director. The Federal agency proposing an action shall determine whether the activity is likely to destroy, cause the loss of, or injure a Sanctuary resource. To the extent practicable, consultation procedures under section 304(d) of the NMSA may be consolidated with interagency cooperation procedures required by other statutes, such as the ESA. The Director will attempt to provide coordinated review and analysis of all environmental requirements.
Exhibit 32

Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, James N. Ryan, the Chief Executive Officer of Petroleum Development Corporation, the managing general partner of PDC 2002-C Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"),  hereby certify that: 

- I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Partnership (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;
- the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

_  _/s/ James N. Ryan                                

Name: James N. Ryan

Title: Chief Executive Officer

Date: ___August 7, 2003_________
[Civil No. 310.]

#### CHARLES GRANVILLE JOHNSTON, Appellant, v. THE NEPTUNE MINING COMPANY, a Corporation, and JOEL SEYMOUR, Trustee, Appellees.

APPEAL from the District Court of the First Judicial District in and for the County of Cochise. R. E. Sloan, Judge.

George G. Berry, for Appellant.

W. H. Stilwell, for Appellees.

June 4, 1890.

Dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3438 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3438

   To require the Department of Defense to meet the annual goal for 
participation in procurement contracts by small business concerns owned 
    and controlled by veterans with service-connected disabilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 16, 2011

  Mr. Filner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Small 
Business, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the Department of Defense to meet the annual goal for 
participation in procurement contracts by small business concerns owned 
    and controlled by veterans with service-connected disabilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT FOR DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE TO MEET CONTRACTING 
              GOAL FOR SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY 
              VETERANS WITH SERVICE-CONNECTED DISABILITIES.

    (a) Requirement.--Each fiscal year, the Department of Defense shall 
meet the goal for participation in procurement contracts that fiscal 
year by small business concerns owned and controlled by veterans with 
service-connected disabilities under section 15(g)(1) of the Small 
Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(g)(1)).
    (b) Definition of Small Business Concern Owned and Controlled by 
Veterans With Service-Connected Disabilities.--
            (1) The term ``small business concern owned and controlled 
        by veterans'' has the meaning provided in section 8127 of title 
        38, United States Code.
            (2) The term ``service-connected'' has the meaning provided 
        in section 101(16) of title 38, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ARC Corporate Realty Trust, Inc.® (ACRT) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert J. Ambrosi, Chief Executive Officer of ACRT, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of ACRT.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Ambrosi  
|Robert J. Ambrosi      
|Chief Executive Officer
|November 14, 2006      



28
### **CHAPTER 57—ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION STUDY**

Sec.
4391.
Congressional statement of findings.
4392.
Presidential study.
4393.
Report to Congress by President.
4394.
Omitted.
4395.
Authorization of appropriations.
No: 14-036 June 18, 2014

CONTACT: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200 

NRC Announces Opportunity to Request a Hearing on 

Fermi 2 Nuclear Plant License Renewal Application

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has announced the opportunity to request a hearing on an 

application to renew the operating license of the Fermi 2 nuclear power plant, located in Monroe 

County, Michigan.

Fermi 2 is a boiling-water reactor operated by DTE Electric Co. DTE filed an application dated

April 24 seeking to renew Fermi 2’s operating license for an additional 20 years. The current operating 

license expires at midnight on March 20, 2025. The NRC staff has determined the application contains 

sufficient information for the agency to formally docket the application and begin its technical and 

environmental reviews. Docketing the application does not preclude requesting additional information 

as the reviews proceed, and it does not indicate whether the Commission will renew the license.

A notice of opportunity to request a hearing was published today in the Federal Register. The 

notice includes detailed instructions for requesting a hearing through the NRC’s E-filing system. The 

deadline for filing petitions is Aug. 18.

The application and information about the license renewal process are available on the NRC 

website. A copy of the license renewal application is available at the Ellis Library and Reference 

Center, 3700 South Custer Road, Monroe, Mich.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 02, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, May 02, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16D0321. NASSER B. ALSAYED v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE

ASSOCIATION.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

15100727
### subpart 1—election assistance commission