alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 710.6 Relationship between the Chemical Weapons Convention Regulations and the Export Administration Regulations, the International Traffic in Arms Regulations, and the Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Regulations.

Certain obligations of the U.S. Government under the CWC pertain to exports and imports. The obligations on exports are implemented in the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) (15 CFR parts 730 through 774) and the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) (22 CFR parts 120 through 130). See in particular §§ 742.2 and 742.18 and part 745 of the EAR, and Export Control Classification Numbers 1C350, 1C351, 1C355 and 1C395 of the Commerce Control List (supplement no. 1 to part 774 of the EAR). The obligations on imports are implemented in the Chemical Weapons Convention Regulations (§§ 712.2 and 713.1) and the Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Regulations in 27 CFR part 447.

[71 FR 24929, Apr. 27, 2006, as amended at 73 FR 78182, Dec. 22, 2008]
#### Aria Contracting Corporation (by Assignment from Atlantic National Trust, LLC, (by Assignment from Fleet National Bank, Formerly Known as Fleet Bank of New York, Formerly Known as Norstar Bank), Appellant, v The Flury Partnership et al., Respondents.

[821 NYS2d 525]

Appeal from an order of the Erie County Court (Timothy J. Drury, J.), entered October 18, 2002 in a mortgage foreclosure action. The order granted defendants’ motion to dismiss as untimely the motion of plaintiff to confirm the Referee’s report of sale and for leave to enter a deficiency judgment in its favor.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at County Court. Present — Hurlbutt, J.P., Gorski, Martoche and Pine, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. 2004N-0063]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled  “Voluntary Registration of Cosmetic Product Establishments”  has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Robbins, Office of Management Programs (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1223.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of July 19, 2004 (69 FR 43001), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under  44 U.S.C. 3507.  An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.  OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0027.   The approval expires on November 30, 2007.   A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at                     *http://www.fda.gov/​ohrms/​dockets*.                

Dated: November 19, 2004.

Jeffrey Shuren,

Assistant Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-26332 Filed 11-29-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-14-0101 - Annual Review of the Lessons-Learned Program

Accession Number: ML14175A595

Date Released: Tuesday, October 14, 2014

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML14175A780 - SECY-14-0101 - Annual Review of the Lessons-Learned Program (5 page(s), 9/26/2014)
    - ML14175A821 - SECY-14-0101 - Enclosure - Potential Lessons-Learned Items Presented to the Lessons-Learned Oversight Board October 2013 - September 2014 (1 page(s), 9/26/2014)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
Fourth Department,

May, 1949.

(May 4, 1949.)

#### Elsbeth F. Kelley, Respondent, v. Wayne P. Kelley, Appellant.

Memorandum: In this action brought to recover unpaid installments of alimony alleged to be due under the provisions of a judgment of absolute divorce granted to plaintiff in the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial District of the State of Florida upon grounds other than adultery, the plaintiff is not entitled to invoke the equitable remedies provided by sections 1171 and 1172 of the Civil Practice Act. *(Miller*v. *Miller,*219 App. Div. 61, affd. 246 N. Y. 636; *Babcock*v. *Babcock,*147 Misc. 900, 903, affd. 239 App. Div. 884. See, also, *Boissevain*v. *Boissevain,*252 N. Y. 178, 181; *Smith*v. *Smith,*255 App. Div. 652, 653-654.) Plaintiff is entitled only to a money judgment in the sum of $825, being the amount of alimony due and unpaid when the action was commenced, with interest from January 9,1941, to April 27, 1948. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action to recover accrued alimony.) Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ.
Exhibit
31.2



CERTIFICATIONS



I,
Ned Mavrommatis, as Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer), certify that:



1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of PowerFleet, Inc.;



2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;



|Date:
    April 29, 2020 | By:    | /s/ Ned Mavrommatis              
|------------------------ | ------ | ---------------------------------
|                         | Name:  | Ned
    Mavrommatis              
|                         | Title: | Chief
    Financial Officer      
|                         |        | (Principal
    Financial Officer)
#### Anna S. Kanner, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. International Railway Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that the court erred in permitting the witness to testify to the declarations of the deceased that his back was wrenched, and in view of the closeness of the case upon the facts we cannot hold that the error was not prejudicial. (See *Greener*v. *General Eleetric Co.,*209 N. Y. 135.) All concurred.
No. 16-014 March 21, 2016

CONTACT: Maureen Conley, 301-415-8200

NRC Issues Possession License to U.S. Army

for Depleted Uranium at Multiple Installations

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has added 15 installations to a license authorizing the U.S. 

Army to possess depleted uranium (DU). The original license, issued in October 2013, applied to two 

sites in Hawaii. The Army will use the same programs for environmental monitoring, radiation safety 

and physical security at all sites.

The DU comes from “spotting rounds” used with the Davy Crockett weapons system to assist 

with targeting accuracy. The Army trained with this system at the sites in the 1960s. The license allows 

the Army to possess and manage up to 12,567 pounds of DU and limits the amount at each site. It 

requires the Army to comply with NRC regulations and standards for protecting the public and the 

environment from radiation, and is subject to NRC inspections and periodic reviews. The license does 

not authorize the Army to use the DU or decommission the sites without additional review and 

approval by the NRC. 

A license allowing the Army to manufacture and distribute the DU spotting rounds issued by the 

NRC’s predecessor, the Atomic Energy Commission, expired in 1978, at the Army’s request. Under the 

earlier license, the Army distributed the spotting rounds to a number of Army installations for testing, 

training and deployment. Each round contained about six ounces of DU. 

The Army told the NRC in November 2006 it had discovered DU fragments at the Schofield 

Barracks on the island of Oahu. Following that discovery, the Army reviewed old records and 

determined the Davy Crockett system was tested at other installations. The Army has enough DU at 

these sites that, under the Atomic Energy Act and NRC regulations, it is required to have a possession 

license. 

The initial license applied to Schofield Barracks on the island of Oahu and the Pohakuloa 

Training Area on the island of Hawaii. The amended license now also applies to Forts Benning and 

Gordon (Georgia); Forts Campbell and Knox (Kentucky); Fort Carson (Colorado); Fort Hood (Texas); 

Joint Base Lewis-McChord/Yakima Training Center (Washington); Fort Bragg (North Carolina);

Fort Polk (Louisiana); Fort Sill (Oklahoma); Fort Jackson (South Carolina); Fort Hunter Liggett 

(California); Fort Wainwright (Alaska); Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst (New Jersey); and Fort 

Riley (Kansas).
ex10_19.htm


    
      

    

    Exhibit
      10.19

    


    


    In
      connection with its annual review of director compensation, on June 7, 2007
      the
      Board of Directors of the Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation made the
      following changes to director compensation effective immediately:

    


    
      	
              ·  

            	
              The
                base annual retainer payable to all directors was increased from
                $14,000
                to $20,000.

            


    

     

    
      	
              ·  

            	
              The
                incremental annual retainer payable to the Chairman of the Board
                was
                increased from $7,500 to $10,000, bringing his total annual retainer
                to
                $30,000.

            


    

     

    
      	
              ·  

            	
              The
                incremental annual retainer payable to the Chairman of the Audit
                Committee
                was increased from $5,000 to $6,500, bringing his total annual retainer
                to
                $26,500.

            


    

     

    
      	
              ·  

            	
              The
                incremental annual retainer payable to the Chairman of the Compensation
                Committee was increased from $0 to $3,500, bringing his total annual
                retainer to $23,500.

            


    

    


    In
      addition, no action was taken with respect to the per diem for attending Board
      and Committee meetings, which remains at $1,000 per day.
#### Herbert E. Kramer, Respondent, v. Board of Education of the City of New York et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Van Voorhis, JJ. [194 Misc. 128.]
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 354 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 354

                   For the relief of Lauli'i Matu'u.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 19, 2011

  Mr. Filner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                   For the relief of Lauli'i Matu'u.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR LAULI'I MATU'U.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Lauli'i Matu'u shall be 
eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 
to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 
filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 
204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Lauli'i Matu'u enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), he shall 
be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if 
otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 
245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Lauli'i Matu'u, the Secretary 
of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 
current or next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's 
birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, 
if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made 
available to natives of the country of the alien's birth under section 
202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Lauli'i 
Matu'u shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 
right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Motive, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned, Scott L. Harmon, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, and Paul M. Baker, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|                                       
|/S/    SCOTT L.
HARMON                 
|Scott L. Harmon Chief Executive Officer



March
7, 2005



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/S/    PAUL M.
BAKER                 
|Paul M. Baker Chief Financial Officer



March
7, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report.
§ 444.2 Unfair credit practices. ( a ) In connection with the extension of credit to consumers in or affecting commerce, as commerce is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, it is an unfair act or practice within the meaning of Section 5 of that Act for a lender or retail installment seller directly or indirectly to take or receive from a consumer an obligation that: ( 1 ) Constitutes or contains a cognovit or confession of judgment (for purposes other than executory process in the State of Louisiana), warrant of attorney, or other waiver of the right to notice and the opportunity to be heard in the event of suit or process thereon.
( 2 ) Constitutes or contains an executory waiver or a limitation of exemption from attachment, execution, or other process on real or personal property held, owned by, or due to the consumer, unless the waiver applies solely to property subject to a security interest executed in connection with the obligation.
( 3 ) Constitutes or contains an assignment of wages or other earnings unless: ( i ) The assignment by its terms is revocable at the will of the debtor, or
( ii ) The assignment is a payroll deduction plan or preauthorized payment plan, commencing at the time of the transaction, in which the consumer authorizes a series of wage deductions as a method of making each payment, or
( iii ) The assignment applies only to wages or other earnings already earned at the time of the assignment.
( 4 ) Constitutes or contains a nonpossessory security interest in household goods other than a purchase money security interest.
( b ) [Reserved]
V 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 232

For the relief of Kuan-Fan Hsieh. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2003

Mr. THOMPSON of California introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

For the relief of Kuan-Fan Hsieh.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR KUAN-FAN 

4 HSIEH. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Kuan-Fan Hsieh shall be eligible for issuance of an 

8 immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an 

9 alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon fil10 ing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 

11 section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to 

12 lawful permanent resident. 
2

•HR 232 IH 

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Kuan-Fan Hsieh 

2 enters the United States before the filing deadline speci3 fied in subsection (c), she shall be considered to have en4 tered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, 

5 be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of 

6 the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 

7 enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Kuan-Fan Hsieh, the Secretary of State shall 

16 instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the cur17 rent or next following fiscal year, the total number of im18 migrant visas that are made available to natives of the 

19 country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the 

20 Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the 

21 total number of immigrant visas that are made available 

22 to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 

23 202(e) of such Act. 

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 
3

•HR 232 IH 

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Kuan-Fan Hsieh shall 

2 not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, 

3 privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality 

4 Act.

Æ
§ 9.6 Termination of participation. ( a ) The Department of Commerce upon finding that a manufacturer is not complying with the conditions of participation set out in these procedures or in a Specification may terminate upon 30 days notice the manufacturer's participation in the program: *Provided,* That the manufacturer shall first be given an opportunity to show cause why the participation should not be terminated. Upon receipt of a notice of termination, a manufacturer may request within 30 days a hearing under the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 558.
( b ) A manufacturer may at any time terminate his participation and responsibilities under this program with regard to a specific class of products by giving written notice to the Secretary that he has discontinued use of the Label and Energy Conservation Mark for all appliances or equipment within that class.
#### In the Matter of Injah Tafari, Appellant, v Donald Selsky, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

[820 NYS2d 373]

*1056Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Kavanagh, J.), entered March 2, 2006 in Ulster County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

A misbehavior report charged petitioner with creating a disturbance, refusing a direct order and violating a movement regulation after he resisted efforts by a correction officer to escort him to his cell. At the conclusion of a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of all charges except creating a disturbance. After exhausting his administrative remedies, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.*

We confirm. Petitioner’s contention that the Hearing Officer erred by failing to consider evidence of his mental illness is without merit. “Although a Hearing Officer must consider an inmate’s mental condition in rendering a determination when the inmate’s mental state is at issue” *(Matter of Siao-Pao v Selsky,*274 AD2d 698, 699 [2000], *lv denied*95 NY2d 767 [2000] [citation omitted]), petitioner submitted no evidence to establish that his mental history was relevant to the proceeding and, despite his claim to the contrary, gave every indication that he was lucid at the time that the incident occurred *(see Matter of Spirles v Goord,*308 AD2d 610, 611 [2003]). Petitioner’s further claim that the misbehavior report arose in retaliation for his past conduct toward correction officers created a credibility issue that the Hearing Officer was entitled to resolve against him *(see Matter of Raqiyb v Goord,*30 AD3d 810, 810 [2006]).

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Spain, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

*

 Although Supreme Court properly transferred the proceeding to this Court because petitioner asserted in his petition that the determination was not supported by substantial evidence, petitioner fails to raise such issue in his appellate brief and, thus, that issue is deemed abandoned *(see Matter of Vallade v Goord, 11*AD3d 786, 787 n [2004]).