alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**Certification**


**Pursuant
      to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the**


**United
      States Code as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906**


**of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the filing of the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Biomass
      Processing Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31,
      2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”), the undersigned, Larry W. Denney, Chairman, President and Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
                as
                applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Dated:  May
      9,
      2006


/s/
      Larry
      W. Denney


Name: 
      Larry W. Denney


Title: Chairman,
      President and


Chief Executive Officer


(principal executive officer)
### Part B—Demonstrations in Youth Development
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Samuel Foster, Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 544]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene R. Silverman, J.), rendered on or about September 21, 2005, unanimously affirmed. Motion *796seeking leave to enlarge record denied. No opinion. Order filed. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Nardelli and McGuire, JJ.
No: II-13-059 October 25, 2013

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416 

NRC Schedules Nov. 4 Meeting in Charlotte to Take Comments on Proposed Spent Nuclear 

Fuel Rule and Environmental Study 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a meeting in Charlotte to receive public 

comment on a proposed rule and supporting environmental study on the effects of extended storage of spent 

nuclear fuel at commercial reactors after the plant is shut down.

The meeting is scheduled to begin at 7 p.m. in the University Ballroom at the Hilton Charlotte 

University Place, 8629 J. M. Keynes Dr. NRC staff will be available one hour before the formal meeting to 

talk to people and answer questions during an informal open house session. 

The proposed “waste confidence” rule was published in the Federal Register in September. It would 

replace a similar provision in NRC’s environmental regulations that was vacated last year by the U.S. Court of 

Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The rule does not authorize extended storage of spent fuel at 

reactor sites – a separate license is required for that. Rather, waste confidence is a generic finding of the 

environmental impacts of storing spent fuel for extended periods beyond the licensed operating life of reactors. 

The draft Waste Confidence Generic Environmental Impact Statement forms the regulatory basis for the 

proposed rule. The EIS and proposed rule are available on the NRC’s waste confidence webpage. 

In addition to the Charlotte meeting, comments may also be provided orally or in writing at one of the

other public meetings the NRC staff will hold around the country as part of the agency’s extensive public 

outreach effort on the waste confidence project. Details of all the meetings are available on the NRC’s 

webpage. 

Public comments may also be submitted online through the federal government’s rulemaking website, 

www.regulations.gov using Docket ID NRC-2012-0246; by e-mail to Rulemaking.Comments@nrc.gov; by fax 

to 301-415-1101; by mail to Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC 20555-0001, 

ATTN: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff; or by hand delivery to 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md., 

between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. on federal workdays. All comments will be considered no matter how they 

are submitted.
### SUBCHAPTER I—NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-11-0169 - U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Implementation Plan for the Radiation Source Protection and Security Task Force Report

Accession Number: ML113070551

Date Released: Thursday, December 22, 2011

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML113070321 - SECY-11-0169 - U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Implementation Plan for the Radiation Source Protection and Security Task Force Report (6 page(s), 12/7/2011)
    - ML113070315 - SECY-11-0169 - Enclosure - U. S. NRC Implementation Plan for the Radiation Source Protection and Security Force Report (100 page(s), 12/9/2011)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### § 286.4 Implementation.

The program is operated on a cost reimbursable basis. It is open for voluntary participation by any U.S.-based body that conducts activities related to conformity assessment falling within the program's scope. A common procedural approach is followed in responding to a request to participate. (See § 286.7 Evaluation process.) All evaluation activities rely on the use of generic program requirements based on standards and guides for the operation and acceptance of activities related to conformity assessment. Specific criteria for use in each evaluation are derived from the program requirements, as appropriate, for the mandated foreign technical requirements specified in the request to participate. A request involving a foreign technical requirement not previously addressed by NVCASE will result in an announcement of NIST's intent to develop evaluation criteria specific to the relevant requirements. NIST will contact all cognizant and interested federal agencies to coordinate appropriate actions and procedures.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices 

# Order

October 4, 2012

145367

- 70

WHEELER ESTATE,

Petitioner

- Appellee,

v SC: 14 5367

COA: 302251

Mich Tax Tribunal: 00

- 343771

DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY,

Respondent

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

NICHOLAS HUZELLA and LISA J. HUZELLA,

Petitioners

- Appellees,

v SC: 14 5368

COA: 302259

Mich Tax Tribunal: 00

- 343772

DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY,

Respondent

- Appellant

.

_________________________________________/

PATRICK WRIGHT and MICHAELON

WRIGHT,

Petitioners

- Appellees,

v SC: 14 5369

COA: 302261

Mich Tax Tribunal: 00

- 343774

DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY,

Respondent

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk October 4, 2012

p0927 2

THOMAS R. WHEELER and PATSY

WHEELER,

Petitioners

- Appellees,

v SC: 14 5370

COA: 302262

Mich Tax Tribunal: 00

- 343775

DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY,

Respondent

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 31, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED.

We further ORDER that this case be argued and submitted to the Court together

with the cases of Tad Malpass v Department of Treasury (Docket Nos. 144430

- 2), at

such futu re session of the Court as the cases are ready for submission.

The Taxation Section of the State Bar of Michigan is invited to file a brief amicus

curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in

this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Salomon Smith Barney Orion Futures Fund L.P. (the‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-Q for the periodended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’),I, Jennifer Magro, Chief Financial Officer and Director of CitigroupManaged Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/    JenniferMagro

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

JenniferMagroCitigroup Managed Futures LLC Chief Financial Officerand Director

Date:    November 14,2006

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Henry Harper, Appellant.

[820 NYS2d 815]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated October 25, 2004 *(People v Harper,*11 AD3d 711 [2004]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered September 11, 2000.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Ritter, J.P., Goldstein, Lifson and Dillon, JJ., concur.
§ 1.93 Notice of proposed penalty. ( a ) *Notice.* Before issuing an order assessing a civil penalty under this subpart against any person, the Commission shall provide to such person notice of the proposed penalty. This notice shall: ( 1 ) Inform such person of the opportunity to elect in writing within 30 days of receipt of the notice of proposed penalty to have procedures of § 1.95 (in lieu of those of § 1.94) apply with respect to such assessment; and
( 2 ) Include a copy of a proposed complaint conforming to the provision of § 3.11(b) (1) and (2) of the Commission's Rules of Practice, or a statement of the material facts constituting the alleged violation and the legal basis for the proposed penalty; and
( 3 ) Include the amount of the proposed penalty; and
( 4 ) Include a statement of the procedural rules that the Commission will follow if respondent elects to proceed under § 1.94 unless the Commission chooses to follow subparts B, C, D, E, and F of part 3 of this chapter.
( b ) *Election.* Within 30 days of receipt of the notice of proposed penalty, the respondent shall, if it wishes to elect to have the procedures of § 1.95 apply, notify the Commission of the election in writing. The notification, to be filed in accordance with § 4.2 of this chapter, may include any factual or legal reasons for which the proposed assessment order should not issue, should be reduced in amount, or should otherwise be modified.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 228 (Monday, November 29, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 69394]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26215]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Enterprise Grid Alliance

    Notice is hereby given that, on October 13, 2004, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. Sec.  4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Enterprise Grid 
Alliance (``EGA'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with 
the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) 
the name and principal place of business of the standards development 
organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development 
activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: Enterprise 
Grid Alliance, San Ramon, CA. The nature and scope of EGA's standards 
development activities are: To provide, plan, develop and coordinate 
voluntary standards and solutions allowing enterprise users to embrace 
and realize the benefits of grid technologies in the near term.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-26215 Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region III

2443 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. III-12-042

Contact: Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil (630) 829-9663

December 4, 2012

E-Mail: OPA3 @nrc.gov 

NRC SCHEDULES PUBLIC MEETING FOR DECEMBER 11 TO DISCUSS 

PALISADES CORRECTIVE ACTIONS AND NRC OVERSIGHT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials have scheduled a public meeting for Tuesday, 

December 11, to discuss with local residents Entergy’s actions to ensure improvements in the 

Palisades nuclear plant’s performance are sustained and the NRC’s independent oversight of 

these actions.

The plant is located in Covert, Mich., approximately 50 miles west of Kalamazoo.

The meeting will be held 6 to 8:30 p.m. and consist of a formal exchange between the 

NRC and Entergy representatives followed by the opportunity for members of the public to ask 

questions and make comments to the NRC staff. The meeting will be held at the Beach Haven 

Event Center, 10420 M-140, in South Haven.

On Nov. 9, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission concluded that the Palisades nuclear 

plant has adequately addressed last year’s safety problems. As a result, the plant has moved to 

the performance column which would no longer require increased oversight by the agency.

However, the NRC has also concluded that the plant still needs additional oversight. As a 

result, the agency will deviate from its normal process by conducting over 1,000 additional hours 

of inspections at the plant in 2013 to: 

verify that the plant’s actions to maintain the safety improvements are properly 

implemented and can be sustained; and 

ensure that the licensee takes actions for the leaks that occurred in 2012, so they 

do not lead to more significant safety concerns.

"We will discuss with the public how the NRC will oversee Entergy on their actions to 

sustain progress on safety performance at Palisades,” said Region III Administrator Charles 

Casto. “This meeting will also provide a forum for the public to have a dialogue with the NRC 
staff on our conclusions regarding maintenance of plant safety as we continue our relentless 

oversight of Palisades.”

NRC’s inspection reports and other documents are available through the NRC’s 

Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) at the NRC website or by 

contacting the NRC’s Region III Public Affairs Office.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address:

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
EXHIBIT
      32.1






CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002








In
      connection with the Amended Yearly Report of Medical International Technology,
      Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending October 31, 2007,
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), I, Karim Menassa, President and Principal Executive Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the amended Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
                of the
                Company.









/s/
 Karim
      Menassa


Karim
      Menassa


President
      and Principal Executive Officer





January
      8, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 30, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 69632]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26396]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-55,746B]


Westpoint Stevens, Clemson Finishing Plant, Clemson, SC; Notice 
of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on October 7, 2004 in response to a 
petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at WestPoint 
Stevens, Clemson Finishing Plant, Clemson, South Carolina.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 16th day of November, 2004.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-26396 Filed 11-29-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [MT-926-05-9820-BJ-MT01] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Montana State Office, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of filing of plat of survey. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of survey of the lands described below in the BLM Montana State Office, Billings, Montana, (30) days from the date of publication in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Steve Toth, Cadastral Surveyor, Branch of Cadastral Survey, Bureau of Land Management, 5001 Southgate Drive, P.O. Box 36800, Billings, Montana 59107-6800, telephone (406) 896-5121 or (406) 896-5009. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This survey was executed at the request of the U.S. Forest Service and was necessary to determine unsurveyed Forest Service lands. The lands we surveyed are: 

## Principal Meridian, Montana 

T. 6 N., R. 16 W. 

The plat, in six sheets, representing the dependent resurvey of a portion of certain mineral surveys, the survey of a portion of the subdivisional lines and the subdivision of sections 17 and 22, in Township 6 North, Range 16 West, Principal Meridian, Montana, was accepted November 16, 2004. 

We will place copies of the plat, in six sheets, and related field notes we described in the open files. They will be available to the public as a matter of information. 

If BLM receives a protest against this survey, as shown on this plat, in six sheets, prior to the date of the official filing, we will stay the filing pending our consideration of the protest. 

We will not officially file this plat, in six sheets, until the day after we have accepted or dismissed all protests and they have become final, including decisions or appeals. 

Dated: November 17, 2004. 

Thomas M. Deiling, 

Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Division of Resources. 

[FR Doc. 04-26026 Filed 11-23-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P
§ 2.14 Disposition. ( a ) When an investigation indicates that corrective action is warranted, and the matter is not subject to a consent settlement pursuant to subpart C of this part, the Commission may initiate further proceedings.
( b ) When corrective action is not necessary or warranted in the public interest, the investigation shall be closed. The matter may nevertheless be further investigated at any time if circumstances so warrant.
( c ) In matters in which a recipient of a preservation demand, an access letter, or Commission compulsory process has not been notified that an investigation has been closed or otherwise concluded, after a period of twelve months following the last written communication from the Commission staff to the recipient or the recipient's counsel, the recipient is relieved of any obligation to continue preserving information, documentary material, or evidence, for purposes of responding to the Commission's process or the staff's access letter. The “written communication” may be in the form of a letter, an email, or a facsimile.
( d ) The Commission has delegated to the Directors of the Bureaus of Competition and Consumer Protection, their Deputy Directors, the Assistant Directors of the Bureau of Competition, the Associate Directors of the Bureau of Consumer Protection, and the Regional Directors, without power of redelegation, limited authority to close investigations.
[77 FR 59309, Sept. 27, 2012]
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the annual report of BidGive International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), James P. Walker, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ James P. Walker, Jr.James P. Walker, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer

Date: April 16, 2007