alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 89 FR 71805, Sept. 4, 2024.

§ 1.29 Gains and losses resulting from investment of customer funds. ( a ) The investment of customer funds in instruments described in § 1.25 shall not prevent the futures commission merchant or derivatives clearing organization so investing such funds from receiving and retaining as its own any incremental income or interest income resulting therefrom.
( b ) The futures commission merchant or derivatives clearing organization, as applicable, shall bear sole responsibility for any losses resulting from the investment of customer funds in instruments described in § 1.25. No investment losses shall be borne or otherwise allocated to the customers of the futures commission merchant and, if customer funds are invested by a derivatives clearing organization in its discretion, to the futures commission merchant.
[78 FR 68637, Nov. 14, 2013]
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, AS AMENDED

I, Debra Hoopes, certify that:

1. I have reviewed
this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Catcher Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



|                      |  |  |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: October 3, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Debra Hoopes       
|                      |  |  |  | Debra Hoopes           
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### Luz Luciano, Respondent, v 144-18 Rockaway Realty Corp. et al., Appellants.

[820 NYS2d 139]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants separately appeal, as limited by their respective briefs, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Grays, J.), dated May 9, 2005, as denied their separate motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, *506on the law, with one bill of costs, the motions are granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The plaintiff allegedly was injured when she fell from a step while exiting a grocery store owned by the defendant 144-18 Rockaway Realty Corp. and leased by the defendant Jonathan Grocery, Inc. The plaintiff, who had frequented the store on prior occasions, was aware of the existence of the step.

The defendants established their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that the condition which allegedly caused the plaintiff to fall was open and obvious and not inherently dangerous *(see Pirie v Krasinski,*18 AD3d 848, 849 [2005]; *Behar v All Seasons Motor Lodge,*6 AD3d 639, 640 [2004]; *Pedersen v Kar, Ltd.,*283 AD2d 625 [2001]; *Canetti v AMCI, Ltd.,*281 AD2d 381, 382 [2001]; *Wint v Fulton St. Art Gallery,*263 AD2d 541 [1999]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(see generally Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). Crane, J.P., Rivera, Skelos and Dillon, JJ., concur.
- Top Cover
- Report Cover
- Contents
- Introduction
- Location, size and population
- Topography
- Physiography
- General geology
- Hydrologic cycle
- Rainfall and evaporation
- Surface-water resources
- Ground-water resources
Shallow aquifer
Floridan aquifer

- Water levels
Water table, shallow aquifer
Potentiometric surface, Floridan aquifer

- Saltwater intrusion
- Water use
- Summary
- References
### §13825. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 13825 was editorially reclassified as section 12185 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
###### Editorial Note on Part 140

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 140 appear at 89 FR 71813, Sept. 4, 2024.

#### § 140.97 [Reserved]
#### Michaela D. Stolow, Respondent-Appellant, v. Julius Stolow et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of J. & H. Stolow, Appellants-Respondents.

On the defendant’s appeal the order is unanimously affirmed, with leave to defendants to appear for examination at any time prior to February 1, 1954. On plaintiff’s appeal, the order is unanimously modified so as to allow an examination of the accountant as a witness on the items enumerated in the order to show cause, and, as so modified, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the plaintiff. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Botein, JJ.
exv10w2



 






Exhibit 10.2




      



      



Re: 2006 Annual Incentive Award




Dear:



The Board of Directors has approved a 2006 cash incentive compensation program (the “2006 Incentive
Program”) for executive officers and corporate employees pursuant to the 2005 Equity Compensation
and Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan”.) This letter provides a summary of how the 2006 Incentive
Program applies to you (the “Award”).





	 	•	 	The 2006 cash incentive awards for covered employees are based in part on Champion’s
cash earnings for 2006.
	 
	 	•	 	Each employee covered by this arrangement will have a “Target Bonus Amount” expressed
as a percentage of that employee’s base salary as of the last day of the Company’s fiscal
year.
	 
	 	•	 	Under the 2006 Incentive Program a cash earnings incentive range
is established based upon the extent to which the 2006 cash earnings
of the Company exceed 2005 cash earnings.
	 
	 	•	 	Your actual bonus earned will be your Target Bonus Amount multiplied by the percentage
2006 cash earnings are above or below the 2006 Cash Earnings Target. Your Target Bonus
Amount will be earned if 2006 cash earnings equal the 2006 Cash Earnings Target. 
	 
	 	•	 	For you to earn an incentive in 2006, cash earnings for 2006
must exceed cash
earnings for 2005. The maximum cash bonus is two times the target bonus
amount.




 









 












	 	•	 	To be eligible for payment under the 2006 Incentive Program, you must hold your present
or another eligible position with the Company at the end of fiscal 2006 (December 30,
2006).
	 
	 	•	 	Payments will be made in cash after audited 2006 year-end results are finalized, on or
about March 1, 2007.
	 
	 	•	 	This Award was granted pursuant to IRC Section 162(m). The Compensation and Human
Resources Committee (the “Committee”) retains the discretion to reduce any Award by
amending or modifying the 2006 cash earnings calculations or targets to take into account
the impact of any significant acquisition activity during the year. All calculations
approved by the Committee shall be final.
	 
	 	•	 	The Committee administers the 2005 Plan and has ultimate authority to interpret and
administer this arrangement. In the event of any conflict between the provisions of the
2005 Plan and any other document, the provisions of the 2005 Plan shall control. Any
questions about the terms, conditions, operation or administration of this arrangement
will be resolved by the Committee in its sole and complete discretion.
	 
	 	•	 	This arrangement supercedes all other annual incentive arrangements.




I am excited about the coming year and the prospects under this arrangement. Please let me
know if you have questions or comments.




Sincerely,




 




 




William C. Griffiths
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, AS AMENDED

I, Debra Hoopes, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Catcher Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness
of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                      |  |  |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                      |  | 
|Date: October 3, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Debra Hoopes       
|                      |  |  |  | Debra Hoopes           
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
§ 20.7 Form and manner of reporting and submitting information or filings. Unless otherwise instructed by the Commission, a clearing organization or reporting entity shall submit data records and any other information required under this part to the Commission as follows: ( a ) Using the format, coding structure, and electronic data transmission procedures approved in writing by the Commission;
( b ) For clearing organizations, not later than 9:00 a.m. eastern time on the next business day following the reporting day or at such other time as instructed by the Commission; and
( c ) For clearing members and swap dealers, not later than 12:00 p.m. eastern time on the second (T+2) business day following the reporting day or at such other time as instructed by the Commission.
No: III-16-016 June 21, 2016

CONTACT: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663

NRC to Hold Open House to Discuss Agency’s Assessment of 

Dresden Nuclear Power Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold an open house on June 30 to discuss the 

agency’s annual review of safety performance of the Dresden nuclear power plant. The two-unit plant 

is operated by Exelon Generation Company, LLC, and is located in Morris, Ill., about 25 miles 

southwest of Joliet.

The public will be able to talk with NRC staff members and ask questions about the plant’s 

2015 performance and the agency’s oversight of the facility. The open house, which will also include 

informational posters, is scheduled for 6-7:30 p.m. CDT at the Grundy County Administrators 

Building, 1320 Union St. in Morris.

“NRC inspectors who work at the plant and NRC staff from our regional office in Lisle, Ill., are 

looking forward to speaking with members of the public about the performance of the Dresden plant 

and other topics related to nuclear safety that are of interest to the community,” said NRC Region III 

Administrator Cynthia D. Pederson. “We hold such meetings near the plant every year to discuss how 

we ensure the plant operates safely and foster an open dialogue with the public.”

The NRC concluded that overall, Dresden operated safely in 2015. 

The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess nuclear 

plant performance. The colors start with “green” and then increase to “white,” “yellow,” or “red,”

commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. Performance indicators are statistical 

measurements of plant and equipment performance. 

Unit 2 and Unit 3 had similar “white” findings of low to moderate safety significance for failing 

to establish measures to ensure the reliable operation of certain safety-related valves. The issue was 

first identified on Unit 3 at the end of 2014 and then on Unit 2 during the second quarter of 2015. Unit 

2 also had a white performance indicator in the area of unplanned shutdowns at the beginning of 2015. 

These issues resulted in increased NRC oversight for both units.

The NRC conducted supplemental inspections to follow up on the issues and determined the 

plant had taken appropriate actions. The plant will continue to receive the NRC’s normal level of 

oversight for the remainder of 2016. 
Page | 2

Normal inspections are performed by the two NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to Dresden. 

Reviews are also performed at the site by specialists from the Region III Office in Lisle, Ill., and from 

the agency’s headquarters in Rockville, Md. Among the areas of performance to be inspected this year 

by NRC inspectors are activities associated with radiological safety, equipment designs, and emergency 

preparedness.

The NRC’s 2015 assessment letter and current performance information for Unit 2 and Unit 3

are available on the NRC website.
§ 12.201 Functions and responsibilities of the Administrative Judge. The Administrative Judge shall be responsible for the fair and orderly conduct of the proceeding and shall have the authority— ( a ) In the Administrative Judge's discretion, to conduct pre-decision conferences in accordance with § 12.206;
( b ) To rule upon all discovery-related motions, and to take such action pursuant to § 12.35 as is appropriate if a party fails to comply with a discovery order;
( c ) To issue orders for the production of documents and tangible things and orders for written testimony, as provided in § 12.34 of these rules;
( d ) To take such action as is appropriate under § 12.35, if a party fails to comply with an order issued by the Administrative Judge pursuant to § 12.34;
( e ) To rule on all motions permitted pursuant to § 12.205;
( f ) To issue default orders for good cause against parties who fail to participate in the proceeding or to comply with these rules;
( g ) If an oral hearing is ordered, to preside at the hearing, which shall include the authority to receive relevant evidence, to administer oaths and affirmations, to examine witnesses, and to rule on offers of proof;
( h ) To issue subpoenas in accordance with the provisions of §§ 12.34, 12.36 and 12.209 of these rules;
( i ) To make the initial decision in accordance with § 12.210 of these rules; and
( j ) To issue such orders as are necessary and appropriate to effectuate the orderly conduct of the proceeding.
[49 FR 6621, Feb. 22, 1984; 49 FR 15070, Apr. 17, 1984, as amended at 59 FR 9637, Mar. 1, 1994; 86 FR 64356, Nov. 18, 2021]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert C. Hinton, Jr., Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 116]

Motion for writ of error coram nobis denied. Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Smith and Pine, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 400
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 400 appear at 78 FR 69289, Nov. 19, 2013.

§ 400.48 Zone-restricted merchandise. ( a ) *In general.* Merchandise in zone-restricted status (19 CFR 146.44) may be entered into the customs territory of the United States only when the Board determines that the entry would be in the public interest. Such entries are subject to the customs laws and the payment of applicable duties and excise taxes (19 U.S.C. 81c(a), 4th proviso).
( b ) *Criteria.* In making the determination described in paragraph (a) of this section, the Board shall consider: ( 1 ) The intent of the parties;
( 2 ) Why the merchandise cannot be exported;
( 3 ) The public benefit involved in allowing entry of the merchandise; and
( 4 ) The recommendation of CBP.
( c ) *Procedure.* ( 1 ) A request for authority to enter “zone-restricted” merchandise into U.S. customs territory shall be made to the Executive Secretary in letter form by the zone grantee or by the operator responsible for the merchandise (with copy to the grantee), with supporting information and documentation.
( 2 ) The Executive Secretary shall investigate the request and prepare a report for the Board.
( 3 ) The Executive Secretary may act for the Board under this section with respect to requests that involve merchandise valued at 500,000 dollars or less and that are accompanied by a letter of concurrence from CBP.
#### § 1025.54 Review of initial decision in absence of appeal.

The Commission may, by order, review a case not otherwise appealed by a party. Should the Commission so order, the parties shall, and participants may, file briefs in accordance with § 1025.53, except that the Commission may, in its discretion, establish a different briefing schedule in its order. The Commission shall issue its order within forty (40) days after issuance of the Initial Decision. The order shall set forth the issues which the Commission will review and may make provision for the filing of briefs. If the filing of briefs is scheduled by the Commission, the order shall designate which party or parties shall file the initial brief and which party or parties may thereafter file an answering brief, or the order may designate the simultaneous filing of briefs by the parties.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 23, 2015

p1216 

# Order

Clerk December 23, 2015

150876

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 150876

COA: 324115

Lenawee CC: 13

- 016749

- FH;

13

- 016750

- FH; 13

- 016751

- FH;

13

- 016790

- FH

DAVID ANTHONY FLORES,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________________________/

By order of September 16, 2015, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answe r

the application for leave to appeal the December 2, 2014 order of the Court of Appeals.

On order of the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leave to

appeal is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the

questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL**

**EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Bekem Metals, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the *“Report”*), I, Yermek Kudabayev, Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

 

| Date: August 13, 2007 | By: | /s/ Yermek Kudabayev |  
 

Yermek Kudabayev

 

Interim Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

  |
|-----------------------|-----|----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
### §13851. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 13851 was editorially reclassified as section 12211 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
### §12408. Authorization of appropriations

There is hereby authorized to be appropriated to carry out the purposes of this chapter (in addition to any amounts made available for such purposes under other Acts)—

(1) $3,000,000 for the fiscal year 1992;

(2) $7,000,000 for the fiscal year 1993;

(3) $10,000,000 for the fiscal year 1994;

(4) $14,500,000 for fiscal year 1996;

(5) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 1997;

(6) $25,000,000 for fiscal year 1998;

(7) $30,000,000 for fiscal year 1999;

(8) $35,000,000 for fiscal year 2000; and

(9) $40,000,000 for fiscal year 2001.

(Pub. L. 101–566, §109, Nov. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 2801; Pub. L. 104–271, title I, §106, Oct. 9, 1996, 110 Stat. 3306.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–271 substituted "under other Acts" for "to other Acts" in introductory provisions and added pars. (4) to (9).
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 24, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 68369]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26199]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notices

Previously Announced Day and Time: Tuesday, November 16, 2004, 10 a.m. 
Meeting Closed to the Public. This meeting was cancelled.

Date and Time: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 at 10 a.m.

Place: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

Status: This meeting will be closed to the public.

Items to be Discussed:
    Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.
    Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. section 437g, section 438(b), 
and Title 26, U.S.C.
    Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
    Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
particular employee.


Date and Time: Thursday, December 2, 2004 at 10 a.m.

Place: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

Status: This meeting will be open to the public.

Items to be Discussed:
    Correction and Approval of Minutes.
    Draft Advisory Opinion 2004-40: The Libertarian Party of Maryland 
by Joseph J. Miller, Treasurer.
    Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Party Donations to Tax-exempt 
Organizations.
    Routine Administrative Matters.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 04-26199 Filed 11-22-04; 2:49 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M