alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 24.3 Misuse of the terms “waterproof,” “dustproof,” “warpproof,” “scuffproof,” “scratchproof,” “scuff resistant,” and “scratch resistant.” It is unfair or deceptive to: ( a ) Use the term “Waterproof” to describe all or part of an industry product unless the designated product or material prevents water from contact with its contents under normal conditions of intended use during the anticipated life of the product or material.
( b ) Use the term “Dustproof” to describe an industry product unless the product is so constructed that when it is closed dust cannot enter it.
( c ) Use the term “Warpproof” to describe all or part of an industry product unless the designated product or part is such that it cannot warp.
( d ) Use the term “Scuffproof,” “Scratchproof,” or other terms indicating that the product is not subject to wear in any other respect, to describe an industry product unless the outside surface of the product is immune to scratches or scuff marks, or is not subject to wear as represented.
( e ) Use the term “Scuff Resistant,” “Scratch Resistant,” or other terms indicating that the product is resistant to wear in any other respect, unless there is a basis for the representation and the outside surface of the product is meaningfully and significantly resistant to scuffing, scratches, or to wear as represented.
### SUBCHAPTER V—PERMITS
No: III-15-022 September 23, 2015

CONTACT: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663

NRC Issues a White Finding to Dresden Power Station

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff issued a white finding of low-to-moderate safety 

significance to the Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Unit 2, for the failure to establish measures to 

ensure the reliable operation of certain safety-related valves. The finding will result in increased 

oversight by the NRC.

On Feb. 7, 2015, one of four valves in the reactor vessel depressurization and overpressure 

protection safety system failed a required maintenance test. This system controls pressure in the reactor 

in certain accident conditions. A subsequent review showed that the valve failed because of improper 

reassembly during the last required test and maintenance in 2013 and increased vibration of plant 

components resulting from an extended power uprate. 

The valve failure occurred when the plant was shut down and had no impact on public health 

and safety.

The plant began operating at extended power in 2009, which is known to increase vibration 

levels on certain plant components, including the valves in the reactor depressurization and 

overpressure protection system. NRC inspectors determined that the facility failed to develop effective

installation and maintenance procedures and guidance to prevent valve damage in light of these new

conditions.

“Even though this issue did not have actual consequences, the inadequate valve design and 

inadequate procedures could have compromised the availability of an important safety system,” said

NRC Region III Administrator Cynthia D. Pederson. “Our follow-up inspection will carefully review 

the plant’s actions to address this issue and independently assess their effectiveness.”

Earlier this year, the company replaced all four valves with a more robust design successfully 

used at other plants to prevent damage from increased vibration following a power uprate.

The NRC will conduct an inspection to verify that the plant staff understands the cause of the 

problem and has taken sufficient action to make sure it does not recur.

As a result of this finding, the plant will move from Column 1 to Column 2 of the NRC’s 

Action Matrix, as of the second quarter of 2015.
Page | 2

The company has 30 days to contest the finding. 

The NRC inspection report and notice of violation are publicly available.

The plant, operated Exelon Generation LLC, is located in Morris, Ill., approximately 25 miles 

southwest of Joliet.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Inergy Holdings, L.P. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John J. Sherman, Chief Executive Officer of Inergy Holdings, L.P., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ John J. ShermanJohn J. Sherman Chief Executive OfficerAugust 9, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1



CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



The undersigned, Nelson C. Rising, the Chief
Executive Officer of Catellus Development Corporation (the Company), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, hereby certifies that:



(i) the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



Date: August 6, 2004



/S/ NELSON C. RISINGNelson C. Rising




THIS
CERTIFICATION IS FURNISHED SOLELY PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, AND IS NOT BEING FILED AS PART OF THE REPORT OR AS A SEPARATE DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT.



A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND WILL BE RETAINED BY CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
#### §§ 1034.112-1034.129 [Reserved]
UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 

June 23, 2016 

IN RESPONSE, PLEASE 

 REFER TO: M160623A 

MEMORANDUM FOR: Brooke P. Clark, Director 

Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication 

FROM: Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS - AFFIRMATION SESSION, 8:55 A.M., 

THURSDAY, JUNE 23, 2016, COMMISSIONERS' 

CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH, 

ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND (OPEN TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE) 

I. SECY-16-0013 – ENTERGY NUCLEAR VERMONT YANKEE, LLC AND ENTERGY 

NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC. (VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER STATION), 

APPEAL OF LBP-15-18 AND PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF SRM-SECY-14-

0125 

The Commission, with Commissioner Svinicki providing additional views and Commissioner 

Baran concurring in part and dissenting in part, approved a Memorandum and Order addressing 

the State of Vermont’s appeal of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board’s denial of its hearing 

request and Vermont’s petition for reconsideration of the Commission’s decision on a request 

for exemptions from the NRC’s emergency planning requirements. The Memorandum and 

Order affirms the Board’s decision in LBP-15-18 and terminates the proceeding. The 

Commission also considered Vermont’s petition for reconsideration of the exemptions and 

sustained the Commission’s decision in the Staff Requirements Memorandum for SECY-14-

0125. 

(Subsequently, on June 23, 2016, the Secretary signed the Memorandum and Order.) 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 EDO 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCAA 

 OCA 

 OIG 

 OPA 

 ODs, RAs, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR
Exhibit 32.1



     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of Tally Ho  Ventures,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  September  30, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the "Report"),  the  undersigned,
Nigel Gregg,  Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certifies to the best of
his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: November 14, 2006



Nigel Gregg
Chief Executive Officer

This  certification  accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
1

**MEMORANDUM To**  : Sewage Sludge Incinerator Docket EPA - HQ - OAR - 2009 - 0559 **From** : Amy

Hambrick , US EPA **Date:** March 2012 **Subject:** Other u nit designs as related to New Stationary Sources and Emission Guidelines for Existing Sources: Sewage Sludge Incineration Units EPA staff organized a teleconference meeting with Uzelac I ndustries on November 16, 2011 to discuss the design of their Biosolid Combustion Unit as it relates to 40 C.F.R. part 241 and 40 C.F.R. part 60.
No: 15-045 July 10, 2015

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200

NRC Issues Final Safety Evaluation Report for 

Byron and Braidwood License Renewal Application

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued its final safety evaluation report (SER) for 

the proposed renewal of operating licenses for the Byron and Braidwood nuclear power plants in 

Illinois. The report concluded there are no technical issues to preclude license renewal for an additional 

20 years of operation.

Byron’s two pressurized-water reactors are located approximately 17 miles southwest of 

Rockford, Ill. Braidwood’s two pressurized-water reactors are located approximately 20 miles 

southwest of Joliet, Ill. Exelon Generation Co. submitted an application in May 2013 to renew all four 

reactors’ licenses for an additional 20 years. If approved, Byron Unit 1’s renewed license would expire 

Oct. 31, 2044, and Byron Unit 2’s renewed license would expire Nov. 6, 2046. If approved, Braidwood 

Unit 1’s renewed license would expire Oct. 17, 2046, and Braidwood Unit 2’s renewed license would 

expire Dec. 18, 2047.

The SER documents the results of the NRC staff’s review of the license renewal application and 

site audit of Byron’s and Braidwood’s aging-management programs to address the safety of plant 

operations during the period of extended operation. Overall, the results show that Exelon has identified 

actions to manage the effects of aging in the appropriate systems, structures and components of the 

plant, and that their functions will be maintained during the period of extended operation.

Issuing the final SER is a significant milestone in the license renewal review process. This 

process proceeds along two tracks – one for review of safety issues and another for environmental 

issues. The staff published Byron’s draft supplemental environmental impact statement (SEIS) for 

public comment in December 2014. The staff published Braidwood’s draft supplemental environmental 

impact statement for public comment in March 2015. The final SEIS for both plants are expected to be 

published later this year.

The SER and the license renewal application have been provided to the Advisory Committee on 

Reactor Safeguards, an independent body of experts that advises the Commission on reactor safety 

matters. The committee is scheduled to discuss the SER during its September meeting and then submit 

its recommendation on license renewal to the Commission.

Documents related to the Byron and Braidwood license renewal application, including the SER, 

as well as information about the license renewal process, are located on the NRC’s website.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of DirectorsAvistar Communications Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements (Nos. 333-115755, 333-43944 and 333-63914)on Form S-8 of Avistar Communications Corporation of our reportdated January 28, 2005 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets ofAvistar Communications Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31,2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations,stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-yearperiod ended December 31, 2004, and the related financial statementschedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Avistar Communications Corporation.
|                           | /s/ KPMG LLP |
|---------------------------|--------------|
| Mountain View, California |
| March 22, 2005       |

 

----
1111 Nineteenth Street, NW, Suite 800 ▪ Washington, DC 20036 ▪ 202 463-2700 Fax: 202 463-2785 ▪ www.afandpa.org

America’s Forest & Paper People® - Improving Tomorrow’s Environment Today®

 October 1, 2010 

Mr. Jim Willis 

Director, Chemical Control Division 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., 

Mail Code: 7405M 

Washington DC 20460-0001 

Subject: Request for Extension to Proposed TSCA Inventory Update Reporting (75 FR 49656, 

August 13, 2010; EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0187) 

Dear Mr. Willis: 

The American Forest & Paper Association (AF&PA) requests a 30-day extension for 

development of comments related to the proposed modifications to the Inventory Update 

Reporting (IUR) under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). A 30-day extension will afford 

AF&PA and other industries impacted by the regulation a better opportunity to provide more 

meaningful feedback to the agency. 

AF&PA is the national trade association of the forest products industry, representing pulp, 

paper, packaging and wood products manufacturers, and forest landowners. AF&PA members 

will be directly and materially impacted by any change in EPA’s IUR requirements. 

We believe the nature of industry’s concerns with the proposed rule as well as the related 

reference documents are complex and require thorough review and consideration before 

providing comments to the agency. While we have been diligently working to understand the 

proposed rule’s impact and to identify alternative approaches, a 30 day extension would allow 

the industry additional time to review the proposal and provide more meaningful feedback to the 

agency. 

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (202) 463-2700 or at 

paul_noe@afandpa.org. 

Sincerely, 

Paul Noe 

Vice President, Public Policy 
Page 2
EXHIBIT 32.1 – 906 Certification





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C., SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the amended quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A  of TransAtlantic Capital Inc. (the "Company") for the three months ended June 30, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.







Date: February 9 , 2015
/s/ Joshua GriggsJoshua Griggs

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to TransAtlantic Capital Inc., and will be retained by TransAtlantic Capital Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
prepared forCENRAP/CENSARAprepared byGregory StellaJim WilkinsonT.W. TescheAlpine Geophysics, LLCFt. Wright, KY4 May 2006Appendix C:Area of Influence Data for EachClass I Area of InterestLa Sal Mountains and Colorado River Canyon Upstream of Moab, UT.Class I Areas Relevant to CENRAPClass I Areas Relevant to CENRAPClass I Area ST NameBig Bend Nat'l Park TXBIBEBoundary Waters MN BWCABreton Island LABRETCaney CreekAR CACRGuadalupe Mountains TXGUMOHercules Glade MO HEGLMingo MO MINGUpper BuffaloAR UPBUVoyageurs MNVOYA2Wichita Mountains OK WIMOMammoth Cave KY MACASipsey WildernessAL SIPSIsle Royale MI ISLEBadlands SD BADLGreat Sand Dunes CO GRSALostwood Wilderness ND LOSTRocky Mtn Nat'l Park CO ROMOSalt Creek NM SACRTheodore Roosevlt ND THROWheeler Peak NM WHPEWhite Mountains NM WHITWind Cave Wilderness ND WICA-1000 -750 -500 -250 0 250 500 750 1000-1500-1250-1000-750-500-250025050075010001250BRET1BIBE1GUMO1SIKE1SAAN1GICL1SACR1WHIT1BOAP1SIPS1CACR1WIMO1BAND1UPBU1SAPE1ELLI1CHER1WHPE1HEGL1CADI1MING1MACA1MEVE1WEMI1GRSA1ELDO1TALL1LIVO1CEBL1WHRI1WHCL1BOND1ROMO1RMHQ1STPE1MOZI1WAUB1LASU1BRLA1NOPL1HALS1WALT1NIOB1BRID1BLMO1WICA1BADL1GRRI1CLPE11YELL2THBA1NOAB1NOCH1SENE1THRO1ISLE1ULBE1ISRO1BOWA1VOYA2MELA1FOPE1VOYA1LOST1Boundary Waters-Voyageurs(green=NO3; red=SO4/EC/OC/CM/FS)Wichita Mountain(green=NO3; red=SO4/EC/OC; blue=CM/FS)Breton Island(green=NO3; red=SO4/EC/OC/CM; blue=FS)Hercules Glade-Mingo WildernessUpper Buffalo-Caney Creek(green=NO3; red=SO4/EC/OC/CM/FS)Salt Creek-Guadalupe Mountain-Big BendWhite Mountain-Wheeler Peak(green=NO3; red=SO4/EC/OC/CM/FS 

# )Rocky Mountain-Great Sand Dunes(green=NO3; red=SO4/EC/OC/CM/FS)EC/OC/FS/CMTheodore Roosevelt-LostwoodBadlands-Wind Cave(green=NO3; red=SO4/EC/OC/CM/FS)Sipsey-Mammoth Cave(all pollutants)
### SUBCHAPTER IV—HOPE FOR HOMEOWNERSHIP OF MULTIFAMILY AND SINGLE FAMILY HOMES
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         231,338
<SECURITIES>                                     1,451
<RECEIVABLES>                                  190,520
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,437
<INVENTORY>                                    326,689
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               786,673
<PP&E>                                         817,094
<DEPRECIATION>                                 196,609
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,517,785
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          440,928
<BONDS>                                        802,895
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     210,964
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,517,785
<SALES>                                      3,092,388
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,100,317
<CGS>                                        2,796,024
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,987,148
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                42,160
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              55,438
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (22,559)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,756
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (6,803)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  32,290
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,487
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T20:34:43-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
§ 1512.6 Requirements for steering system. ( a ) *Handlebar stem insertion mark.* Quill-type handlebar stems shall contain a permanent ring or mark which clearly indicates the minimum insertion depth of the handlebar stem into the fork assembly. The insertion mark shall not affect the structural integrity of the stem and shall not be less than 21 ⁄ 2 times the stem diameter from the lowest point of the stem. The stem strength shall be maintained for at least a length of one shaft diameter below the mark.
( b ) *Handlebar stem strength.* The handlebar stem shall be tested for strength in accordance with the handlebar stem test, § 1512.18(g), and shall withstand a force of 2000 N (450 lbf) for bicycles and 1000 N (225 lbf) for sidewalk bicycles.
( c ) *Handlebar.* Handlebars shall allow comfortable and safe control of the bicycle. Handlebar ends shall be symmetrically located with respect to the longitudinal axis of the bicycle and no more than 406 mm (16 in) above the seat surface when the seat is in its lowest position and the handlebar ends are in their highest position. This requirement does not apply to recumbent bicycles.
( d ) *Handlebar ends.* The ends of the handlebars shall be capped or otherwise covered. Handgrips, end plugs, control shifters, or other end-mounted devices shall be secure against a removal force of no less than 66.8 N (15 lbf) in accordance with the protective cap and end-mounted devices test, § 1512.18(c).
( e ) *Handlebar and clamps.* The handlebar and clamps shall be tested in accordance with the handlebar test, § 1512.18(h). Directions for assembly of the bicycle required in the instruction manual by § 1512.19(a)(2) shall include an explicit warning about the danger of damaging the stem-to-fork assembly and the risk of injury to the rider that can result from overtightening the stem bolt or other clamping device. The directions for assembly shall also contain a simple, clear, and precise statement of the procedure to be followed to avoid damaging the stem-to-fork assembly when tightening the stem bolt or other clamping device.
[43 FR 60034, Dec. 22, 1978, as amended at 76 FR 27888, May 13, 2011]