alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1608.1 Terms defined. As used in the rules and regulations in this subchapter D, unless the context otherwise specifically requires: ( a ) The term *act* means the Flammable Fabrics Act, sec. 1 *et seq.,* 67 Stat. 111-115, as amended, 68 Stat. 770, 81 Stat. 568-74 (15 U.S.C. 1191-1204, note under 1191).
( b ) The terms *rule, rules, regulations,* and *rules and regulations,* mean the rules and regulations prescribed by the Commission pursuant to section 5(c) of the act.
( c ) The term *United States* means, the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the Territories and Possessions of the United States.
( d ) The terms *marketing or handling* means the transactions referred to in section 3 of the act.
( e ) The definition of terms contained in section 2 of the act shall be applicable also to such terms when used in rules promulgated under the act.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Inergy Holdings, L.P. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John J. Sherman, Chief Executive Officer of Inergy Holdings, L.P., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ John J. ShermanJohn J. Sherman Chief Executive
OfficerAugust 8, 2007


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating,

acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written

statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished

to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
****

**	







	** 	**



	
 !"
##** 	
**"

"

	
	#$	
#
 
	%
&	






#
#**   **##


'()(*	
+	#
** 	 **#	
#


#,

	-

& 	
 

  

    
  
 		 
**  **	   

&  	
 #
  
  ,
 	
 
%
# 	#
 	# "
 
**  **
#& + 
 
 
#  

# . 	
,
 "
 	
 ##  "**  **
#
#

"
#
#&**
**!/0//00*** **
#
 '( 1( (( 2( 3( 4( ) )( /#



4(-  1( 12 13 (1 14**  **/#



34(  )2 )2- )2 +

 
5
6%#**  **7 -(**  ° **** ***
8,
 -&-&(**


 **/#



 43(12 +

 
/
+"
6%#**  **7
 --4(** ° **** ***
8,
 -&--&'(** ° ** /0** 8**

**9+!:8	

#
	#"

#& -; /
	


(**  ° **<$;#$		
"
 	
#"


,

&	




"

#**  **



<-((** ° **;& ; +

 
	 	
 
 
  	
 $ ,

 
# "**  ** 

 
&  =	 
 	# "
 
	
#   $**  **

>?.

"
> -?	#"
	
,
#&** **=@$"
,
#
	
	#
	
 #	**  **"
	
#"


"
#

& '; !$ 	
 
 		
  $

 - 
 # 
  **  **
#
#
		#"

		 **  **	


,
	
#
,& 1; / 	
 $
 #
 , <(  ;    ' 
   """**  ** 

&**  **(; / 	
 #

# $  



# # 	

#   

  3 **  **4** ° **.	#	


#
#"
<-($;# 	

-	34**  ° **"

&+
,
 	

"

	
#-	&**  **A /

"

	

 
	
,
#**  **
	

	<B(;
& 9!+0!:8.




"
**  **#

 
#

%
,#	

@**  **+


<>-?; +
C**  **
#
C 
 0


$**  **
 6
# 
	 *
,
 

  # ** ** 
%

 # #,
"

%

,&** **!:0*D*0!*D/+6//00***

**
 '( 1( (( 2( 3( 4( ) )( /


4(- 1( 12 13 (1 14**  **/


34( )2 )2- )2 /
"

	 ( 1' '( '' 3   -2**  **

"

	 - - - - - - - - 8

(**  ° **<; 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4**  ***	
#
<** ° **+; '( 1( (( 2( 3( 4( ) )(** **

*
	<!**** ; 2 )&' )&3 -- - -' -1 -3** **-?!#<! **  **; &( &4 -&  '&( ( 3&( - 0=
C<?; - - 3) 2( 1( '( 3( (** **
*
	<E; -( -3 -3&( '' 1 ( (( 3(** **#9
$/<** ° **; 3( 3( 3( 2- ( 14 1( 1'**  **"
+"<; F2 ()  - --( -((  1**

***+80++68** ! **
  
 
 

5
  
# "
 -(** ° **&  	

 	# "
 
#   


  (**  ° ** # 		
 "
#
# "

 
  
    #&

,
""
	
	
** **#	#"
C
 	


#
&!	

-	

#
&**  **
 

 43( 12 	# "
 
#  	
 

#    **  **


"


-((** ° **&*



"
-(** ° **
 

5  	
 #. 	  "
 
,

# "
 	
  2  3**  ° **  ****
#
##	

G*D++0*+H+*+** ***+90****+68/00*I.			#"

#J		#	

**

**& /
#
.



",
(**  ° **
	
 "
#		


&6
,
<$&(?;#**  **
"

 	
 

  	
 

. 	
,
 ",
 	 
,
  "

**  **#
 #  #
,
# 

 
 "
 #,


 

#&  ! 	
 **  ** 2 	  

# 
&** **0+6K*+90D9!+**

**=

	

#

6
#!
*

*** **&**

**/+E+88 


,"
C#(C
5
&**  **
43( 12

,"
(C#(C
5
&**
**/8!0*/0**** **	

#

,"
-C#(C
& 3)4)-(-
 3)4)(2=C 34()-8

**  **34()1L	
 34()(=
 3)4)--2D
 34()3
#**  **

#
###
,
-?"

	,
&**
**060+*0+80*** **



,"

"$
-.-25& !
"
#**  **!$$"
#**

**
@ 

&# 
@ 4 - -)))M**
No: III-15-013 May 8, 2015

CONTACT: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663

NRC Schedules Open House May 14 to Discuss 

Performance of Byron Nuclear Station

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials will hold an open house May 14 to discuss the 

agency’s assessment of the Byron Station’s performance during 2014. The plant is located in Byron, 

Ill., about 17 miles southwest of Rockford, and is operated by Exelon Generation Co., LLC.

The open house is scheduled for 6 to 7:30 p.m. at the Byron Station Training Building, 

Room 107, 4450 N. German Church Road in Byron. The NRC staff will be available for informal 

one-on-one discussions about the performance of the Byron plant and other topics related to the NRC’s 

regulatory activities.

“These open houses give the public a chance to talk informally with our staff about the plant 

and other NRC-related issues,” said NRC Region III Administrator Cynthia D. Pederson. “It is a great 

opportunity for people to meet our resident inspectors and other staff; and a great opportunity for us to 

interact with people who live near the plant.”

The NRC concluded that, overall, Byron Units 1 and 2 operated safely. 

The NRC determined that both units had green inspection findings and performance indicators 

and received standard NRC oversight during the entire year.

The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess nuclear 

plant performance. The colors start with “green” and then increase to “white,” “yellow,” or “red,” 

commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. Performance indicators are statistical 

measurements of plant and equipment performance. 

This year, Byron Unit 1 and 2 will continue to receive the detailed routine inspections 

conducted at all nuclear power plants. Routine inspections are performed by two NRC Resident 

Inspectors assigned to the plant and by inspection specialists from the Region III Office in Lisle, Ill., 

and the agency’s headquarters in Rockville, Md. 

The NRC’s 2014 assessment letter and current performance information for Unit 1 and Unit 2 is 

available on the NRC website.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-537

_____________________________

CARMUS R. SHAW,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Baker County.

Mark W. Moseley, Judge.

July 24, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, ROBERTS, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Carmus R. Shaw, pro se, Appellant.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
### Part D—Preservation of Contractual Rights
### SERVED: December 17, 2013 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF SKYWEST AIRLINES FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2013

- 0293

ORDER OF DISMISSAL Respondent has advised the undersigned the within captioned matterhas been settled and Respondent has withdrawn its Request for Hearing. 14 C.F.R. § 13.215 states: "At any time before orduring a hearing, an agency attorney may withdraw a complaint orparty may withdraw a request for a hearing withoutthe consent ofthe administrative lawjudge. Ifan agency attorney withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the answer, the administrative lawjudge shall dismiss the proceedings under this subpart withprejudice." WHEREFORE, the within filed Requestto Withdraw Request for Hearing havingbeen read and considered, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Respondent's Requestto Withdraw Request for Hearing be and is hereby granted; and 2. This proceedingbe and is hereby dismissed withprejudice.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge
Attachment

- Service List

### SERVICELIST ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal AviationAdministration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000 1



### Todd C. Emerson, Respondent's Counsel 

### Director

- Government and Legal Affairs SkyWest Airlines 444 South RiverRoad St. George, UT 84790 TEL: 435-634-3530 FAX: 435-634-3505 Robert Spitzer, Complainant's Counsel 

### Attorney, Office ofRegional Counsel Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, W A 98057 TEL: 425-227-1417 FAX: 425-227-1007 ONE COPY

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536

I 

### FDMS No. FAA-2013-0293 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 2
Ontologies OF and FOR Intelligent Systems

A. Meystel

Drexel University, NIST

1. Constructing an ontology of Intelligent System (IS) is a nontrivial issue since its (IS)

existence has not been demonstrated, and the term is used as a metaphor. It raises a

number of additional questions. Not the last among them is whether existential problems

can be legitimately formulated for the domain of imaginary worlds. The answer is

probably an affirmative one, since imaginary worlds do exist (at least in the subsystem of

planning) and thus generate corresponding ontologies. Another question is linked with

processes of reflexia that emerge within intelligent systems. This really opens a can of

worms since individual and group processes of reflection are based upon the property of

self-reference – not a trivial subject for the theory of IS ontology. This set of problems is

difficult but is pleasurable because it requires surveying a multicultural (at least,

multidisciplinary) domain including psychological and linguistic references as well as

engineering ones.

2. Constructing an ontology for Intelligent System (IS) is inescapable because its (IS)

functioning dwells upon input, output, and intermediate (e. g. interface, etc.) ontologies.

The need in multi-resolutional ontologies is looming, although the ontology community

temporarily (eternally?) resists making this one of the regular issues of research. The

difficulty of the latter subject is in the fact, that despite of the unity of the multiresolutional ontology of the IS, it needs consistency checks to be conducted at each level.

Nevertheless, the community seems to be well prepared for solving this issue, too.
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before 

HITESMAN, STEWART, and GEIS

Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Daniel VAN DIJK

Information Systems Technician Third Class (E-4), U.S. Navy

Appellant

No. 201900288

Decided: 21 May 2020

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judges: 

Derek Butler (arraignment) 

Aaron Rugh (trial)

Sentence adjudged 16 September 2019 by a general court-martial 

convened at Naval Base San Diego, California, consisting of a military 

judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to 

E-1, confinement for 42 months,1 and a bad-conduct discharge

For Appellant: 

Captain Brian L. Farrell, USMC

For Appellee:

Brian K. Keller, Esq.

 

1 The convening authority suspended confinement in excess of 33 months pursuant to a pretrial agreement. 
United States v. Van Dijk, NMCCA No. 201900288

Opinion of the Court

2

_________________________

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under 

NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

_________________________

PER CURIAM:

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law 

and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial 

rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 

U.S.C. §§ 859, 866. 

The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR.

Clerk of Court
#### Douglas Schott et al., Doing Business under the Name of Charles F. Schott Co., Plaintiffs, v. Darling Stores Corporation, Defendant. Darling Shops, Inc., Appellant, v. Douglas Schott et al., Doing Business under the Name of Charles F. Schott Co., Respondents.

Present — 'Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

Michael D. Durham, as President and Chief Executive Officer of ADA-ES, Inc. (the Company), certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Companys Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael D. Durham
|Name:                 |  | Michael D. Durham                    
|Title:                |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date: August 8, 2007
#### In the Matter of 482 So. Salina St., Inc., Petitioner, against State Liquor Authority, Respondent.

Motion for a stay granted on condition printed records and briefs are filed and served on or before February 1, 1955.
### §10248. Administrative powers of Negotiator

In carrying out his functions under this subchapter, the Negotiator may—

(1) appoint such officers and employees as he determines to be necessary and prescribe their duties;

(2) obtain services as authorized by section 3109 of title 5, at rates not to exceed the rate prescribed for grade GS–18 of the General Schedule by section 5332 of title 5;

(3) promulgate such rules and regulations as may be necessary to carry out such functions;

(4) utilize the services, personnel, and facilities of other Federal agencies (subject to the consent of the head of any such agency);

(5) for purposes of performing administrative functions under this subchapter, and to the extent funds are appropriated, enter into and perform such contracts, leases, cooperative agreements, or other transactions as may be necessary and on such terms as the Negotiator determines to be appropriate, with any agency or instrumentality of the United States, or with any public or private person or entity;

(6) accept voluntary and uncompensated services, notwithstanding the provisions of section 1342 of title 31;

(7) adopt an official seal, which shall be judicially noticed;

(8) use the United States mails in the same manner and under the same conditions as other departments and agencies of the United States;

(9) hold such hearings as are necessary to determine the views of interested parties and the general public; and

(10) appoint advisory committees under chapter 10 of title 5.

(Pub. L. 97–425, title IV, §408, as added Pub. L. 100–202, §101(d) [title III], Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1329–104, 1329–121; Pub. L. 100–203, title V, §5041, Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–247; amended Pub. L. 117–286, §4(a)(273), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4336.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 100–202 and Pub. L. 100–203 added identical sections.

#### Amendments

2022—Par. (10). Pub. L. 117–286 substituted "chapter 10 of title 5." for "the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.)."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### References in Other Laws to GS–16, 17, or 18 Pay Rates

References in laws to the rates of pay for GS–16, 17, or 18, or to maximum rates of pay under the General Schedule, to be considered references to rates payable under specified sections of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, see section 529 [title I, §101(c)(1)] of Pub. L. 101–509, set out in a note under section 5376 of Title 5.
#### §§ 1034.161-1034.169 [Reserved]
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


                           Certification of Treasurer

      The undersigned Treasurer of United Community Bankshares of Florida, Inc.
does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that this report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that, to my knowledge, the information contained in the report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operation of United Community Bankshares of Florida, Inc.


                                          /s/ Shirley L. Tyler
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Shirley L. Tyler
                                          Treasurer

      Date: August 12, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to United Community
Bankshares of Florida, Inc. and will be furnished by United Community Bankshares
of Florida, Inc. and first to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### Charles F. Thurn, trading as John L. Thurn *&*Company, Appellee, v. Bertha C. Schwartz, Administratrix et al., Defendants. On Appeal of Marie Bade and Bertha C. Schwartz, Administratrix, Appellants.

Gen. No. 21,274.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Richard E. Burke, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the March term, 1915.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed January 3, 1916.

Rehearing denied January 17, 1916.

Statement of the Case.

Action by Charles F. Thurn, trading as John L. Thnrn *&*Company, plaintiff, against Marie Bade and Bertha C. Schwartz, administratrix of the estate of Gustav Bade, deceased, defendants.

On July 23, 1910, a judgment for $573.21 was confessed and entered against Marie Bade and Gustav *360Bade in favor of plaintiff in the Superior Court. Gustav Bade, after entry of judgment, died, and on March 20, 1914, Marie Bade, his codefendant, and Bertha C. Schwartz as administratrix of the estate of Gustav Bade, deceased, moved the Superior Court to vacate the judgment and for leave to plead. This action was allowed. A trial was had before court and jury, which resulted in a verdict finding the issues for the plaintiff. A motion for a new trial being denied, it was ordered that the judgment theretofore rendered July 13, 1910, stand in full force and effect and that plaintiff have execution upon said judgment and for costs. From such judgment, defendants appeal.

Abstract of the Decision.

Judgment, § *80*****—when motion to vacate confessed judgment denied for laches.*A delay of four years in moving to vacate a confessed judgment is such laches as to warrant a denial of the motion.

Jones, Keener & Posvic, for appellants; DeWitt C. Jones, of counsel. "

William Schwemm, for appellee.

*

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.
Exhibit 32.1

                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                           by Chief Executive Officer

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of VSB Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Merton Corn, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: November 10, 2004

                                              /s/ MERTON CORN
                                              --------------------------------
                                              Merton Corn, President and CEO


A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       27
#### § 1107.1 Purpose.

This part establishes the protocols and standards for ensuring continued testing of children's products periodically and when there has been a material change in the product's design or manufacturing process and safeguarding against the exercise of undue influence by a manufacturer on a third party conformity assessment body. It also establishes a program for labeling of consumer products to indicate that the certification requirements have been met pursuant to sections 14(a)(2) and (i)(2)(B) of the Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA) (15 U.S.C. 2063(a)(2) and (i)(2)(B)).