alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 930.42 Public participation. ( a ) Management programs shall provide for public participation in the State agency's review of consistency determinations. Public participation, at a minimum, shall consist of public notice for the area(s) of the coastal zone likely to be affected by the activity, as determined by the State agency.
( b ) *Timing of public notice.* States shall provide timely public notice after the consistency determination has been received by the State agency, except in cases where earlier public notice on the consistency determination by the Federal agency or the State agency meets the requirements of this section. A public comment period shall be provided by the State sufficient to give the public an opportunity to develop and provide comments on whether the project is consistent with management program enforceable policies and still allow the State agency to issue its concurrence or objection within the 60 day State response period.
( c ) *Content of public notice.* The public notice shall: ( 1 ) Specify that the proposed activity is subject to review for consistency with the enforceable policies of the management program;
( 2 ) Provide sufficient information to serve as a basis for comment;
( 3 ) Specify a source for additional information, e.g., a State agency web site; and
( 4 ) Specify a contact for submitting comments to the State agency.
( d ) Procedural options that may be used by the State agency for issuance of public notice include, but are not limited to, public notice through an official State gazette, a local newspaper serving areas of coastal zone likely to be affected by the activity, individual State mailings, public notice through a management program newsletter, and electronic notices, e.g., web sites. However, electronic notices, e.g., web sites, shall not be the sole source of a public notification, but may be used in conjunction with other means. Web sites may be used to provide a location for the public to obtain additional information. States shall not require that the Federal agency provide public notice. Federal and State agencies are encouraged to issue joint public notices, and hold joint public hearings, to minimize duplication of effort and to avoid unnecessary delays, so long as the joint notice meets the other requirements of this section.
§ 754.5 Horses for export by sea. ( a ) *License requirement.* As indicated by the letters “SS” in the “Reason for Control” paragraph of the “License Requirements” section of ECCN 0A980 on the CCL (supplement no. 1 to part 774 of the EAR) a license is required for the export of horses exported by sea to all destinations, including Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom.
( b ) *License policy.* ( 1 ) License applications for the export of horses by sea for the purposes of slaughter will be denied.
( 2 ) Other license applications will be approved if BIS, in consultation with the Department of Agriculture, determines that the horses are not intended for slaughter. You must provide a statement in the additional information section of the application certifying that no horse under consignment is being exported for the purpose of slaughter.
( 3 ) Each application for export may cover only one consignment of horses.
[61 FR 12844, Mar. 25, 1996, as amended at 73 FR 49331, Aug. 21, 2008; 89 FR 28601, Apr. 19, 2024]
-r IMOTHY V. JOHNSON
AGRICULTURE ChAIHMt.u, RuKt-.L DE-VELOPr>M:rn,**RE~EARU-L** BloTfE'-,Ht'JGUJ<_,,, AND F<)Rf::tl:lN Ac,HI\- uL: 'JAE: 0EPAA1MENT**OeLRJ\f!ON~'** oF

0VE'HS!GHT AND CREDIT TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, PUBLIC

8Ull DINGS, AND EMERGE-NC-r MANAGEMEN! HIGHWAYS AND TRANSIT WATER RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT Ms. Aloha Ley Associate Director 

# q[ongress oftbe Wniteb $tates**j!)ou~e** 

# of**l\epre~entattbe~** 

## Ma:sbtngton, .ID<!t 20515-1315 June 8, 2012

Small CommunityAir Service Development Program (SCASDP) 1200 NewJersey Avenue Southeast W86-310 Washington, DC 20590 Re: Docket OST 2012-0069; Bloomington Normal Airport Authority Central Illinois Regional Airport, Bloomington, Illinois Dear Ms. Ley, WASHiHCT1Y·J l)FFI\::E LJ 1207 Lou<:lWOhlH Huuo:.E 0Frru.:**81Jii.Oif·~·.J V'i/ASH!~J(,T(Jt·.,**  DC 20515



### n 0
0
0 1202) 225-·2:!71

iJIS1Fl!CT OFFICES 2004 Fox DRIVE CHAMPAIGN, ll 61820

1217)403-4690 202 NORTH PROSPECT ROAD SUITE 203 BLOOMINGTON, ll 61704 (309) 663-7049 655 WEST LlNCOLN UNiT 8 CHARLESTON, ll 61920

(217) 343--6759 1001 MARKET STREEr SuiTE 102 MOUNT CARMEL, IL 62863 1618) 262-8719



### r The Central Illinois Regional Airport (BMI) is critical to the regional economy ofdownstate Illinois. This airport has been avital transportation link for employees of Fortune 100 and Fortune 1000companies, students at state and private universities, and countless families. On June 2, 2012, Southwest Airlines discontinued all AirTran Airways service from BMI resulting in the abrupt loss of morethan thirty-five percent ofthe daily seat capacity atthe airport. The departure of these routes along with the consolidation ofcompeting airlines compromises the access and fare competition that is necessaryto maintain and growcentral Illinois' economy, particularlyto primary Mid-Atlantic and Northeastern markets. The CommunityAirService Initiative (CASI) is a non-airport community-based initiative created to attract new service to central Illinois through BMI. Building on the local success ofprevious publicprivate partnerships, CASI is prepared to responsibly administerthis award to attract badly needed eastbound service and generate a return on federal resources. The central Illinois region is continuously responding to new challenges presented to it. A positive award from youroffice empowersthe communityto continue battling back against a strained economic climate while responsibly managing federal resources. Thank you foryour consideration.

Timothv V Johnson

r'- ' r- r'**~** ,- ; i
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of John Holmes, as Executor of G. Claude Beard, Deceased, Appellant. Walter C. Baird et al., Respondents.

Present — Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Deyo, Santry and Bergan, JJ. [See *post,*p. 1005.]
Exhibit 32.1




Certification Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350


by Chief Executive Officer




In connection with the Quarterly Report of VSB Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Raffaele M. Branca, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: November 9, 2010





/s/ Raffaele M. BrancaRaffaele M. BrancaPresident and CEO





A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




37
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Trade Commission

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sandra M. Peay, Contact Representative, or Renee Hallman, Case Management Assistant, Federal Trade Commission, Premerger Notification Office, Bureau of Competition, Room H-303, Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326-3100.

By direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 04-25934  Filed 11-22-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
### Part D—Interdisciplinary, Community-Based Linkages
Adams. Ke:V,i,V{OSif 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Kevin, 

Doby, Joy C -Washington, DC <Joy.C.Doby@usps.gov> 

Thursday, May 02, 2013 2:39 PM 

Adams, Kevin (OST) 

Mahnke, Mary J -Washington, DC; Anzalone, Joseph - Washington, DC; Lujan, Joseph R 

- Denver, CO; Lochmann, Robert E - Anchorage, AK; McDonald, Joe F - Anchorage, AK 

RE: Extension of deadline for proposals at Tatitlek, Alaska, to April 4 

Please reference the following as response for the USPS per the proposals at Tatitlek, Alaska: 

The mail for both locations presently originate from Cordova and not ANC. Making ANC the head out point 

has the potential to exclude mail as one of the traffic elements to support the service. If CDV was a point on 

the itinerary enroute to both locations it would capture that volume. -

In addition, it is possible that none of the potential carriers interested in the subject service are certificated 

carriers. If so, this would create a potential issue for the Postal Service because the Postal Service may only 

provide payment for domestic air service to certificated carriers. 

Should you have questions or concerns, feel free to contact me at 202 268-7254 or via email. 

Thank you, 

Joy
### §13333. Clean coal, waste-to-energy

The Secretary shall establish a program of research, development, demonstration, and commercial application with respect to the use of solid waste combined with coal as a fuel source for clean coal combustion technologies. The program shall address—

(1) the feasibility of cofiring coal and used vehicle tires in fluidized bed combustion units;

(2) the combined gasification of coal and municipal sludge using integrated gasification combined cycle technology;

(3) the creation of fuel pellets combining coal and material reclaimed from solid waste;

(4) the feasibility of cofiring, in fluidized bed combustion units, waste methane from coal mines, including ventilation air, together with coal or coal wastes; and

(5) other sources of waste and coal mixtures in other applications that the Secretary considers appropriate.

(Pub. L. 102–486, title XIII, §1303, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2972.)
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 89 FR 71805, Sept. 4, 2024.

#### § 1.68 [Reserved]
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title:****NationalResidue Program: [plan] /
 
1998| 1999|2000| 2001|2002| 2003| 2004
 
SuDoc Number: A 110.23/2:
Item Number: 0032-C-07 (online)
CGP System Number: 00554614
 
March 4, 2021**
### §10708. Administrative provisions

(a) The Institute shall prescribe procedures to ensure that financial assistance under this chapter shall not be suspended unless the grantee, contractor, person, or entity receiving financial assistance under this chapter has been given reasonable notice and opportunity to show cause why such actions should not be taken.

(b) Except as provided by Federal law other than this chapter, no officer or employee of the Institute, and no recipient of assistance under this chapter, may use or reveal any research or statistical information furnished under this chapter by any person and identifiable to any specific private person for any purpose other than the purpose for which the information was obtained in accordance with this chapter. Such information and copies thereof shall be immune from legal process, and shall not, without the consent of the person furnishing such information, be admitted as evidence or used for any purpose in any action, suit, or other judicial, legislative, or administrative proceedings.

(Pub. L. 98–620, title II, §209, Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3344; Pub. L. 100–702, title VI, §606, Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4653.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title II of Pub. L. 98–620, Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3336, known as the State Justice Institute Act of 1984, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of title II to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 10701 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–702 substituted "Administrative provisions" for "Special procedures" in section catchline, and amended text generally, changing structure of section from a single unlettered paragraph to one consisting of subsecs. (a) and (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1985, see section 216 of Pub. L. 98–620, set out as a note under section 10701 of this title.
§ 23.18 Misrepresentation of weight and “total weight.” ( a ) It is unfair or deceptive to misrepresent the weight of a diamond.
( b ) It is unfair or deceptive to use the word “point” or any abbreviation in any representation, advertising, marking, or labeling to describe the weight of a diamond, unless the weight is also stated as decimal parts of a carat (e.g., 25 points or .25 carat). Note to Paragraph ( b
):
A carat is a standard unit of weight for a diamond and is equivalent to 200 milligrams (1 ⁄ 5 gram). A point is one one-hundredth (1/100) of a carat.
( c ) If diamond weight is stated as decimal parts of a carat (e.g., .47 carat), the stated figure should be accurate to the last decimal place. If diamond weight is stated to only one decimal place (e.g., .5 carat), the stated figure should be accurate to the second decimal place (e.g., “.5 carat” could represent a diamond weight between .495-.504).
( d ) If diamond weight is stated as fractional parts of a carat, a conspicuous disclosure of the fact that the diamond weight is not exact should be made in close proximity to the fractional representation and a disclosure of a reasonable range of weight for each fraction (or the weight tolerance being used) should also be made.
Note to Paragraph ( d
):
When fractional representations of diamond weight are made, as described in paragraph (d) of this section, in catalogs or other printed materials, the disclosure of the fact that the actual diamond weight is within a specified range should be made conspicuously on every page where a fractional representation is made. Such disclosure may refer to a chart or other detailed explanation of the actual ranges used. For example, “Diamond weights are not exact; see chart on p. X for ranges.”
UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 (321)-261-2547 

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com

August 4, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Bldg. 10A

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

RE: Summary Grant for Unmanned Vehicle University Exemption Request 

Under Section 333 of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Modernization 

and Reform Act of 2012, 49 U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11

Dear Sir or Madam:

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), 49 

U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, Unmanned Vehicle University, a University 

licensed to grant Doctorate and Master’s Degrees in Unmanned (Air, Ground, Sea and 

Space) Systems Engineering and a Certificate in UAS Project Management, seeks 

exemption from the following listed Code of Federal Regulations (“CFR”) to allow 

commercial operation of the previously approved DJI Phantom Series and DJI Inspire 

within the National Airspace System (NAS) for controlled, low-risk, product demonstration 

and flight training conducted within and under the conditions outlined within the Petition 

for Exemption, or as may be established by the FAA, as required by Section 333 

requirements. 

Unmanned Vehicle University in the accompanying petition, seeks exemption from the 

requirements of 14 C.F.R. §§ 45.27(a), 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.105, 91.119(c), 

91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2),and 91.417(a) and (b). 

Unmanned Vehicle University has requested that the FAA not request public comment 

on its petition because it would not set any precedent and because the relief requested 

is identical to numerous exemptions granted previously by the FAA. 14 C.F.R. § 11.87. 

In addition, Unmanned Vehicle University will be utilizing the same DJI Phantom Series 

and DJI Inspire proven technologies the FAA has already accepted and approved in over 

75 percent of approved exemptions. All of the appropriate documentation to accompany 

Unmanned Vehicle University Section 333 Petition is included. Combined, their 

comprehensive Section 333 Exemption and the approvals the FAA has already given to
UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 (321)-261-2547 

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com

their chosen products and the technology, should provide the support necessary to the 

FAA for a Summary Grant of Unmanned Vehicle University’s Section 333 Petition and 

expedite the process. 

Kelly J. Neubecker

CEO

UASolutions Group, Inc.

CC:

Bill Crozier

Joe Morra

Jake Troutman

Dean Griffith, Esq.

Robert Papas
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


          The undersigned executive officers of the Registrant hereby certify to
the best of their  knowledge that this  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the
quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of  Section  13(a) or  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  and the
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



Date: August 8, 2006                By: /s/ William M. Tandy
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name: William M. Tandy
                                        Title:Chief Executive Officer




Date: August 8, 2006                By: /s/ Michael D. Wortham
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name: Michael D. Wortham
                                        Title:Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of the Intermediate Settlement of the Accounts of Henry J. Kimball, as Administrator, etc., of Evan Williams, Deceased, Appellant. William L. Williams and Others, Appellants; Matilda A. MacArthur and Others, Respondents.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to respondents, payable out of the estate. All concurred.
#### § 1223.1 Scope.

This part establishes a consumer product safety standard for infant and cradle swings (including combination swings).
#### Gong Hee Gee *et al.,*Plaintiffs-Appellees, *v.*Judith Davidson, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 59444;

First District (1st Division)

August 5, 1974.

*655Shulman and Spivack, of Chicago (Norman E. Goldman, of counsel), for appellant.

Lisco and Field, of Chicago (Barry L. Kroll and Robert F. Lisco, of counsel), for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

BURKE, J., took no part.
§ 500.17 Fractions. ( a ) SI metric declarations of net quantity of contents of any consumer commodity may contain only decimal fractions. Other declarations of net quantity of contents may contain common or decimal fractions. A common fraction shall be in terms of halves, quarters, eighths, sixteenths, or thirty-seconds; except that: ( 1 ) If there exists a firmly established general consumer usage and trade custom of employing different common fractions in the net quantity declaration of a particular commodity, they may be employed, and
( 2 ) If linear measurements are required in terms of yards or feet, common fractions may be in terms of thirds. A common fraction shall be reduced to its lowest terms; a decimal fraction shall not be carried out to more than three places.
( b ) If a statement includes small fractions, smaller variations in the actual size or weight of the commodity will be permitted as provided in § 500.25, than in cases where the larger fractions or whole numbers are used.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LILIANA RAMIREZ TRUJILLO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-73293

Agency No. A089-091-380

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 29, 2014** 

Seattle, Washington

Before: NOONAN, HAWKINS, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

Liliana Ramirez Trujillo (“Petitioner”), a twenty-six-year-old agricultural

worker and mother, seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)

decision affirming her order of removal and dismissing her appeal of the Immigration

FILED

SEP 05 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her motion to suppress evidence. We have jurisdiction

pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny her petition for review. 

We need not reach Petitioner’s sole argument on appeal—that the BIA erred in

affirming the denial of her motion to suppress evidence—because, after the IJ denied

this motion, Petitioner admitted the allegations in the Notice to Appear (“NTA”) and

conceded that she was removable as charged.1

 These admissions and concession of

removability were sufficient for the government to meet its evidentiary burden,

Perez-Mejia v. Holder, 663 F.3d 403, 414–15 (9th Cir. 2011), and they provide an

independent basis upon which to sustain Petitioner’s order of removal, I.N.S. v. LopezMendoza, 468 U.S. 1032, 1043 (1984). 

Even if Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) agents egregiously

violated Petitioner’s Fourth and/or Fifth Amendment rights when they initially

arrested and detained her, these violations “would not prevent reliance by the [BIA]

on [her] voluntary admission of illegal entry at the subsequent deportation hearing.”

Rodriguez-Gonzalez v. I.N.S., 640 F.2d 1139, 1140–41 (9th Cir. 1981) (citing MedinaSandoval v. I.N.S., 524 F.2d 658, 659 (9th Cir. 1975) and Cuevas-Ortega v. I.N.S., 588

F.2d 1274, 1278 n.9 (9th Cir. 1979)). 

1

 Petitioner’s counsel made these representations on her behalf during the

pleading stage of her removal hearing. Absent egregious circumstances or a due

process violation, neither of which Petitioner alleges, she is bound by her attorney’s

representations. See Torres-Chavez v. Holder, 567 F.3d 1096, 1101–02 (9th Cir.

2009); Magallanes-Damian v. I.N.S., 783 F.2d 931, 934 (9th Cir. 1986). 
Because Petitioner’s admissions and concession of removability constituted

“substantial evidence” supporting the BIA’s determination that Petitioner is

removable, id. at 1140, we deny her petition for review. 

PETITION DENIED.