alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §13455. Electric drives

#### (a) Program

The Secretary shall conduct a 5-year program, in accordance with sections 13541 and 13542 of this title, to increase the efficiency of electric drive technologies, including adjustable speed drives, high speed motors, and high efficiency motors.

#### (b) Proposals

Within 1 year after October 24, 1992, the Secretary shall solicit proposals for projects under this section.

(Pub. L. 102–486, title XXI, §2105, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3070.)
No: III-15-021 August 24, 2015

CONTACT: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663

NRC Schedules Open House Aug. 31 to Discuss 

Performance of DC Cook Nuclear Power Plant

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials will hold an open house Aug. 31 to discuss the 

agency’s assessment of the DC Cook Nuclear Power Plant’s performance during 2014. The two-unit 

plant is operated by Indiana Michigan Power Co., and is located in Bridgman, Mich., approximately 

13 miles south of Benton Harbor.

The open house is scheduled for 5 to 7 p.m. EDT at the Maud Preston Palenske Memorial 

Library, Norris Room, 500 Market St., in St. Joseph. The NRC staff will be available for discussions 

about the performance of the DC Cook plant and other topics related to the NRC’s regulatory activities.

“We host open houses, which are informal meetings between the NRC staff and the public, to 

have an open dialogue with local residents about the plant and other NRC-related issues of interest to 

the public,” said NRC Region III Administrator Cynthia D. Pederson. “It is a great opportunity for 

people to meet our resident inspectors and other staff; and a great opportunity for us to speak with 

people who live near the plant.”

The NRC concluded that, overall, DC Cook Units 1 and 2 operated safely in 2014. All 

performance indicators and inspection findings for DC Cook were “green” and both units remained in 

Column 1 of the action matrix. As a result, both units will continue to receive the NRC’s normal level 

of oversight during 2015. 

The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess nuclear 

plant performance. The colors start with “green” and then increase to “white,” “yellow,” or “red,” 

commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. Performance indicators are statistical 

measurements of plant and equipment performance. The NRC’s action matrix reflects overall plant 

performance and agency response. There are five columns in the matrix with Column 1 requiring a 

baseline level of inspections. A move to the other columns results in an increased level of NRC 

oversight and inspections.

Inspections are performed by two NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant, inspection 

specialists from the Region III Office in Lisle, Ill., and specialists from the agency’s headquarters in 

Rockville, Md. Among the areas of performance to be inspected this year by NRC inspectors are 

activities associated with radiological safety, equipment designs, and emergency preparedness.

The NRC’s 2014 assessment letter and current performance information for Unit 1 and Unit 2 is 

available on the NRC website.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Robert T. Smith, Appellant.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed.
No: II-15-003 January 22, 2015

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

 Joey Ledford 404-997-4416 

NRC Names New Senior Resident Inspector for Mixed Oxide Facility

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Atlanta have selected Chad Huffman as the Senior 

Resident Inspector for the Mixed Oxide (MOX) Fuel Fabrication Facility under construction at the 

Savannah River Site in Aiken, S.C.

Chad Huffman is a native of Kings Mountain, N.C., and began his 

NRC career in 2005 as a reactor risk engineer in the Office of Nuclear 

Reactor Research at NRC headquarters in Rockville, Md. In 2011, Huffman 

joined the NRC’s Resident Inspector development program in the Region II 

office in Atlanta. 

During his time in Region II, Huffman participated in construction 

inspections at Watts Bar Unit 2 in Tennessee as well as at Vogtle Units 3 and 4 near Waynesboro, Ga. 

Since 2012, he has served as a construction Resident Inspector at Vogtle Units 3 and 4. 

Prior to joining the NRC, Huffman worked as an engineer at a nuclear utility and also held 

various positions in residential and commercial construction.

He received his bachelor’s and master’s degrees in nuclear engineering from North Carolina 

State University in Raleigh, N.C.

“Chad Huffman has the experience and commitment to help ensure that construction is 

completed according to NRC regulations and in a way that protects people and the environment,” said 

NRC Region II Deputy Regional Administrator for Construction Fred Brown. 

The MOX facility, which will be owned by the Department of Energy’s National Nuclear 

Security Administration, is part of an effort to make surplus weapons-grade plutonium into more 

proliferation-resistant forms. Converting the plutonium into MOX fuel will enable it to be used in 

commercial reactors to generate electricity.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3854 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to help leverage private investment 

for transit oriented development near transit stations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 31, 2012 

Mr. PETERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to help leverage 

private investment for transit oriented development near 

transit stations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Transit Related Invest5 ment Improvement Act of 2012’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE TRANSPORTATION INFRA7 STRUCTURE FINANCE AND INNOVATION ACT. 

8 Chapter 6 of title 23, United States Code is amend9 ed— 

10 (1) in section 601(a)(8)— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3854 IH

1 (A) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of sub2 paragraph (C); 

3 (B) by striking the period at the end of 

4 subparagraph (D) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; 

5 (C) by adding after subparagraph (D) the 

6 following new subparagraph: 

7 ‘‘(E) a project to improve or construct 

public infrastructure located within 1 8 ⁄2 mile of 

9 the station area of a fixed guideway transit fa10 cility that includes improvements to mobility 

11 and parking, rehabilitation or construction of 

12 streets, transit stations, structured parking, 

13 walkways and bikeways, or other costs eligible 

14 under joint development guidelines, as deter15 mined by the Administrator of the Federal 

16 Transit Administration.’’; and 

17 (2) in section 602(a)(3), by inserting after sub18 paragraph (B) the following new subparagraph: 

19 ‘‘(C) OTHER PROJECTS.—In the case of a 

20 project eligible under subparagraph 

21 601(a)(8)(E), eligible project costs shall be rea22 sonably anticipated to equal or exceed 

23 $10,000,000.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Charles A. Daniel v. National Suction Cleaner Company.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Page, JJ.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 20, 2014

h0617

Order 

Clerk

June 20, 2014

148636

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148636

COA: 315914

Midland CC: 11-008207-AR

MICHAEL GOOD,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 6, 2013 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

MARKMAN, J. (dissenting).

I would grant leave to appeal to consider whether the trial court’s decision to 

exclude evidence of the complainant’s alleged threat to a prosecution witness, as well as 

evidence of the complainant’s alleged statement of an intention to get involved in a fight 

on the evening of the criminal incident for which defendant was convicted, violated 

defendant’s statutory or constitutional right to present a defense. See Chambers v 

Mississippi, 410 US 284 (1973); People v Barrera, 451 Mich 261 (1996); MCL 763.1.
### §12891. Program authority

The Secretary is authorized to make—

(1) planning grants to help applicants develop homeownership programs in accordance with this part; and

(2) implementation grants to enable applicants to carry out homeownership programs in accordance with this part.

(Pub. L. 101–625, title IV, §441, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4172; Pub. L. 102–550, title I, §181(a)(2)(B)(ii), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3735.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–550 struck out "(a) In General" before "The Secretary is authorized" and subsec. (b) which read as follows: "Authorization of Appropriations.—There are authorized to be appropriated for grants under this part $36,000,000 for fiscal year 1991, and $195,000,000 for fiscal year 1992. Any amounts appropriated pursuant to this subsection shall remain available until expended."
**GAO-02-978R**                      Published: Jul 26, 2002. Publicly Released: Jul 26, 2002.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Status of FY22 Projects 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

GAO reviewed the audit report covering the financial statements of the Aviation Hall of Fame for fiscal years 1999 and 2000. The audit reports included the auditors' opinions that the financial statements of the corporation were presented fairly in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

## Full Report

Full Report (2 pages)

Accessible Text 

## Office of Public Affairs

### Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

### Public Inquiries

Public Affairs
PublicAffairs@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

Auditing and Financial Management

Financial statement auditsAccounting standardsFederal corporationsReporting requirementsAviationAudit reportsFinancial statementsFederally chartered corporationFinancial managementAuditors
#### In the Matter of Theodore Deutschmann et al., Appellants, for a Determination of the Value of Their Stock in American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
Horne International,
Inc.



EXHIBITS



Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



Each of the undersigned hereby certifies,
for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his/her capacity as an officer of Horne International, Inc. (“Horne”), that, to
the best of his/her knowledge and belief, the quarterly report of Horne International, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
31, 2013, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Horne International,
Inc..



|Date: August 20, 2013 | By: | /s/    Dallas Evans                                                                                                                          | 
|--------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                      |     | Dallas Evans                                                                                                                                
|                      |     | Chief Executive Officer (Principal
        Executive Officer)
        Interim Chief Financial Officer
        (Principal Accounting Officer)



This written statement is being furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-Q. A signed original of this statement has been provided
to Horne International, Inc. and will be retained by Horne International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with thequarterly report on Form 10-Q of Little Sioux Corn Processors, L.L.C. (the “Company”)for the three month fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, GaryGrotjohn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        | /s/ Gary Grotjohn        |
|--------|--------------------------|
|        | Gary Grotjohn            |
|   | Chief Financial Officer  |
|   | Dated: February 14, 2007 |

 

----
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region III

2443 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. III-11-029

Contact: Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil (630) 829-9663

August 15, 2011

E-Mail: OPA3.RegionIII@nrc.gov 

NRC BEGINS SPECIAL INSPECTION AT PALISADES NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has started a Special Inspection to review the 

circumstances surrounding the failure of a service water pump component. Service water pumps 

help cool safety related equipment under regular and emergency conditions. The plant has three 

service water pumps and at least one is required to be operable in case of an emergency.

The single-unit pressurized water reactor is operated by Entergy Nuclear Operations Inc., 

and is located in Covert, Mich., about 65 miles southwest of Grand Rapids.

NRC resident inspectors were immediately notified on Aug. 9 of the issue and observed 

the utility’s actions. NRC staff identified that the problem looked similar to a previously failed 

component issue from 2009. A metals and materials expert from the NRC Region III office was 

sent on Aug. 11 to further inspect this potential repetitive issue.

Today a three-member NRC team specializing in metals, materials and pumps, will 

review the historical issues associated with the components at the plant, previous corrective 

actions, the utility’s ability to review industry operating experience, and the potential

susceptibility on the other service water pumps.

“There are no immediate safety concerns involved with this failure,” NRC Region III 

Administrator Mark Satorius said. “Nevertheless, we want to gain a better understanding of 

exactly why the component failed and determine if there are steps the utility could have taken 

that would have prevented the failure from happening.”

The issue involved a component failure on a service water pump. The plant was operating 

under normal conditions when control room indicators showed there was a change in the flow of 

water from one of the three service water pumps. Utility staff stopped the pump, investigated the 

problem and replaced all the coupling components. A coupling is a connector used to hold two 

pipes together. The plant is operating safely and has since started using the service water pump 

again.
The NRC’s special inspection report documenting the team’s findings will be issued 

within 45 days of the inspection’s completion through the AGENCY DOCUMENTS ACCESS 

AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (ADAMS) at the NRC website. 

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, AS AMENDED

I, Denis McCarthy, certify that:

1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Catcher Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants
other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: November 12, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Denis McCarthy     
|                        |  |  |  | Denis McCarthy         
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer