alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

POWER OF ATTORNEY

    Know all by these presents, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Stathy
Darcy the undersigned's true and lawful attorney-in-fact to:

(1)    execute for and on behalf of the undersigned, in the undersigned's capacity as an
officer and/or director of CNA Financial Corporation (the "Company"), Forms 3, 4,
and 5 in accordance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
the rules thereunder; and

(2)    do and perform any and all acts for and on behalf of the undersigned which may be
necessary or desirable to complete and execute any such Form 3, 4, or 5,
complete and execute any amendment or amendments thereto, and timely file
such form with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and any
stock exchange or similar authority; and

(3)   take any other action of any type whatsoever in connection with the foregoing
which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact, may be of benefit to, in the best
interest of, or legally required by, the undersigned, it being understood that the
documents executed by such attorney-in-fact on behalf of the undersigned
pursuant to this Power of Attorney shall be in such form and shall contain such
terms and conditions as such attorney-in-fact may approve in such attorney-in-
fact's discretion.

       The undersigned hereby grants to each such attorney-in-fact full power and authority to
do and perform any and every act and thing whatsoever requisite, necessary, or proper to be
done in the exercise of any of the rights and powers herein granted, as fully to all intents and
purposes as the undersigned might or could do if personally present, with full power of
substitution or revocation, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorney-in-fact, or such
attorney-in-fact's substitute or substitutes, shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of this
power of attorney and the rights and powers herein granted. The undersigned acknowledges
that the forgoing attorney-in-fact, in serving in such capacity at the request of the undersigned,
are not assuming, nor is the Company assuming, any of the undersigned's responsibilities to
comply with Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

       This Power of Attorney shall supersede any existing power of attorney and shall remain
in full force and effect until a successor power of attorney is executed or the undersigned is no
longer required to file Forms 3, 4, and 5 with respect to the undersigned's holdings of and
transactions in securities issued by the Company, unless earlier revoked by the undersigned in
a signed writing delivered to the foregoing attorneys-in-fact.

       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Power of Attorney to be
executed as of this 4th day of January, 2011.

                          /s/ Jonathan D. Kantor
                        _________________________
                        Name: Jonathan D. Kantor
```
#### United States Trust Company of New York, as Sole Surviving Trustee of the Trusts Created for Harry Payne and Others by Oliver H. Payne, Plaintiff, v. Harry P. Bingham et al., Defendants. Dorothy L. Kniffin, as General Guardian of the Property of Norah Knight and Another, Infants, Appellant; United States Trust Company of New York, as Executor and Trustee, et al., Respondents.

Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 834.]
### Part C—Medicare+Choice Program

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior part C of this subchapter, consisting of section 1395x et seq., was redesignated part E of this subchapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

References to Medicare+Choice deemed to refer to Medicare Advantage or MA, subject to an appropriate transition provided by the Secretary of Health and Human Services in the use of those terms, see section 201 of Pub. L. 108–173, set out as a note under section 1395w–21 of this title.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-633

In Re: AARON DARRYL THOMAS,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-94-69-2)

Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: December 30, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aaron Darryl Thomas, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Aaron Darryl Thomas, a federal prisoner, petitions for a writ

of mandamus. He asks that we direct the district court to rule on

his motion for disclosure of a signed grand jury form. Because the

district court has denied the motion, we deny the petition for a

writ of mandamus as moot. To the extent that Thomas wishes, through

the mandamus petition, to appeal the district court's order, we

note that mandamus is not a substitute for appeal. In re United

Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately set forth in the material before us, and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### § 314.5 Effective date.

Section 314.4(j) is effective as of May 13, 2024.

[88 FR 77509, Nov. 13, 2023]
Orderentered Octoberyi.

, 2012

In The 

## €ourtoftpptat jfittli

## ttrtctoftxaatafta No. 05-12-00378-CR JEFFREY ALLEN STEELE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appelice On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial CourtCauseNo. F11-00780-R 

### ORDER The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, or ifnot indigent, whetherretained counsel has abandonedthe appeal. See TEx. R. App. P. 38.8(b). Ifthe trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. Slate, 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). Ifappellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointmentofnew counsel.We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record ofthe proceedings, which shall include written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS ofthe date ofthis order. This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier.

DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE
### §13902. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 13902 was editorially reclassified as section 12262 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
#### Bruce Cox, Respondent, v. Duluth Steamship Company, Appellant.

Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon stipulation.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Catherine A. Nally, Deceased. John J. Brown, as Administrator of the Estate of Catherine A. Nally, Deceased, Appellant; Helen A. Murphy, Respondent.

Appeal by the administrator *1064from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County, made in a discovery proceeding, adjudging that decedent made a valid gift of certain moneys to respondent and that the latter is the owner of the balance of the funds in her hands. Decree unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ.
§ 313.12 Limits on sharing account number information for marketing purposes. ( a ) *General prohibition on disclosure of account numbers.* You must not, directly or through an affiliate, disclose, other than to a consumer reporting agency, an account number or similar form of access number or access code for a consumer's credit card account, deposit account, or transaction account to any nonaffiliated third party for use in telemarketing, direct mail marketing, or other marketing through electronic mail to the consumer.
( b ) *Exceptions.* Paragraph (a) of this section does not apply if you disclose an account number or similar form of access number or access code: ( 1 ) To your agent or service provider solely in order to perform marketing for your own products or services, as long as the agent or service provider is not authorized to directly initiate charges to the account; or
( 2 ) To a participant in a private label credit card program or an affinity or similar program where the participants in the program are identified to the customer when the customer enters into the program.
( c ) *Examples* — ( 1 ) *Account number.* An account number, or similar form of access number or access code, does not include a number or code in an encrypted form, as long as you do not provide the recipient with a means to decode the number or code.
( 2 ) *Transaction account.* A transaction account is an account other than a deposit account or a credit card account. A transaction account does not include an account to which third parties cannot initiate charges.
§ 3.39 Orders requiring witnesses to testify or provide other information and granting immunity. ( a ) Where Commission complaint counsel desire the issuance of an order requiring a witness or deponent to testify or provide other information and granting immunity under 18 U.S.C. 6002, Directors and Assistant Directors of Bureaus and Regional Directors and Assistant Regional Directors of Commission Regional Offices who supervise complaint counsel responsible for presenting evidence in support of the complaint are authorized to determine: ( 1 ) That the testimony or other information sought from a witness or deponent, or prospective witness or deponent, may be necessary to the public interest, and
( 2 ) That such individual has refused or is likely to refuse to testify or provide such information on the basis of his or her privilege against self-incrimination; and to request, through the Commission's liaison officer, approval by the Attorney General for the issuance of such order. Upon receipt of approval by the Attorney General (or his or her designee), the Administrative Law Judge is authorized to issue an order requiring the witness or deponent to testify or provide other information and granting immunity when the witness or deponent has invoked his or her privilege against self-incrimination and it cannot be determined that such privilege was improperly invoked.
( b ) Requests by counsel other than Commission complaint counsel for an order requiring a witness to testify or provide other information and granting immunity under 18 U.S.C. 6002 may be made to the Administrative Law Judge and may be made *ex parte.* When such requests are made, the Administrative Law Judge is authorized to determine: ( 1 ) That the testimony or other information sought from a witness or deponent, or prospective witness or deponent, may be necessary to the public interest, and
( 2 ) That such individual has refused or is likely to refuse to testify or provide such information on the basis of his or her privilege against self-incrimination; and, upon making such determinations, to request, through the Commission's liaison officer, approval by the Attorney General for the issuance of an order requiring a witness to testify or provide other information and granting immunity; and, after the Attorney General (or his or her designee) has granted such approval, to issue such order when the witness or deponent has invoked his or her privilege against self-incrimination and it cannot be determined that such privilege was improperly invoked.
(18 U.S.C. 6002, 6004) [74 FR 1830, Jan. 13, 2009]
No: I-15-031 June 26, 2015

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330 E-mail: opa1.resource@nrc.gov

 Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331 

 

NRC to Hold Regulatory Conference with Entergy on July 8th

Regarding Apparent Violation at Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will conduct a Regulatory Conference with Entergy on 

July 8th to discuss an apparent violation at the Pilgrim nuclear power plant. The issue involves safety 

relief valves at the Plymouth, Mass., facility and has been preliminarily classified as “white,” or of low 

to moderate safety significance.

The meeting is scheduled to begin at 1 p.m. at the NRC’s Region I Office, at 2100 Renaissance 

Blvd. in King of Prussia, Pa. Directions to the office are available on the NRC’s website. It will be 

open to the public, with an opportunity for those in attendance to ask questions of the NRC staff 

following the completion of the discussion with the company.

Those who cannot attend the meeting in person will be able to listen to the session via 

teleconference and view the slides online. Registration for those services is available via this link. More 

information about the meeting is available in the notice pertaining to it.

The apparent violation to be discussed stems from a Special Inspection performed by the NRC 

at Pilgrim following a winter storm-induced shutdown in January. One of the complications during the 

shutdown involved the use of safety relief valves. Attempts to open one of the plant’s safety relief 

valves were unsuccessful. NRC inspectors determined that Entergy, the plant’s owner and operator, 

could have prevented the issue by identifying, evaluating and correcting a condition involving the 

safety relief valves after a plant shutdown on Feb. 9, 2013.

If requested by a plant’s owner, a Regulatory Conference is held to discuss an inspection 

finding and its safety significance, as well as to allow the company an opportunity to clarify any issues 

raised in the inspection report. No decision will be made at the conference regarding the apparent 

violation or any enforcement action. Those decisions will be made by NRC officials at a later time.
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
        I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TranS1 Inc.;2.
    
        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
        The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
     5.
    
        The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ Joseph P. SlatteryJoseph P. SlatteryExecutive Vice President and 
Chief Financial Officer
§ 1052.1 Scope and purpose. ( a ) Section 9(d)(2) of the Consumer Product Safety Act, 15 U.S.C. 2058(d)(2), and section 4(d) of the Flammable Fabrics Act, 15 U.S.C. 1193(d), provide that certain rules under those statutes shall be promulgated pursuant to section 4 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553, except that the Commission shall give interested persons an opportunity for the oral presentation of data, views or arguments in addition to the opportunity to make written submissions. Several rulemaking provisions of the statutes administered by the Commission are subject only to the rulemaking procedures of the Administrative Procedure Act. Section 4(c) of the Administrative Procedure Act provides that the opportunity for oral presentations may or may not be granted in rulemaking under that section. In addition, section 27(a) of the Consumer Product Safety Act, 15 U.S.C. 2076(a), authorizes informal proceedings that can be conducted in non-rulemaking investigatory situations.
( b ) This part sets forth rules of procedure for the oral presentation of data, views or arguments in the informal rulemaking or investigatory situations described in subsection (a) of this section. In situations where the opportunity for an oral presentation is not required by statute, the Commission will determine whether to provide the opportunity on a case-by-case basis.
INFORMATION REPORT

October 31, 2013 SECY-13-0114

For: The Commissioners 

From: Reginald W. Mitchell

 Assistant for Operations 

 Office of the Executive Director for Operations 

Subject: WEEKLY INFORMATION REPORT - WEEK ENDING 

 OCTOBER 11, 2013 

Contents Enclosure

Office of Information Services A 

Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer B 

 

 

 

 

 Reginald W. Mitchell /RA/ 

 Assistant for Operations, OEDO 

Contact: 

L. Rakovan, OEDO 
October 31, 2013 SECY-13-0114

For: The Commissioners 

From: Reginald W. Mitchell

 Assistant for Operations 

 Office of the Executive Director for Operations 

Subject: WEEKLY INFORMATION REPORT - WEEK ENDING 

 OCTOBER 11, 2013 

Contents Enclosure

Office of Information Services A 

Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer B 

 

 

 Reginald W. Mitchell /RA/

 Assistant for Operations, OEDO 

Contact: 

L. Rakovan, OEDO 

DISTRIBUTION: 

EDO R/F AO R/F 

ADAMS Accession No: ML13304A903

OFFICE OEDO AO/OEDO 

NAME LRakovan 

 

RMitchell 

DATE 10/31/13 10/31/13 

 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
OCTOBER 11, 2013 ENCLOSURE A

Office of Information Services (OIS) 

Items of Interest 

Week Ending October 11, 2013

Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Privacy Act (PA) Requests and Appeals Received 

During the Period of October 4, 2013 – October 10, 2013: 

 

Any and all records regarding ablation or impact ablation, and 

communications of such with listed companies, since January 1, 2011 to 

present

FOIA/PA-2014-0003

Access to information regarding the Global Laser Enrichment’s (GLE) 

activities in Paducah, KY and Wilmington, NC FOIA/PA-2014-0004

All records pertaining to the use of lethal force on American citizens 

during the last five years FOIA/PA-2014-0005

Copy of The Neutron Pile as a Tool in Quantitative Analysis; The Gallium 

and Palladium Contents of Iron Meteorites FOIA/PA-2014-2006
OCTOBER 11, 2013 ENCLOSURE B 

Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer (OCHCO) 

Items of Interest 

Week Ending October 11, 2013 

Arrivals

None 

Retirements

None 

Departures

TABOKOV, EMIL SR. PROGRAM ANALYST ADM
No: 15-024 April 15, 2015

CONTACT: Maureen Conley, 301-415-8200 

NRC Approves Final Rule on Packaging and Transporting Radioactive Materials

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission on April 14 approved a final rule amending the 

requirements for packaging and transporting radioactive materials. The NRC published proposed 

changes to the rule for comment in May 2013.

The agency’s current transportation regulations are based, in part, on standards developed by the 

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), an international standard-setting organization. The IAEA 

periodically revises its transportation standards to reflect acquired knowledge and experience. The NRC 

is updating its own regulations to be compatible with the IAEA’s 2009 transportation standards and the 

U.S. Department of Transportation’s regulations.

The NRC and the DOT share regulatory authority over radioactive materials transport. The 

DOT is the lead federal agency for regulating hazardous materials transport in the United States and for 

interacting with the IAEA.

The final rule makes several changes to improve consistency with IAEA standards and revises a

fissile material exemption to further reduce the very low chance that uranium with very low enrichment 

could inadvertently begin a nuclear chain reaction.

The NRC is also changing the requirements for quality assurance programs to provide greater 

flexibility and extend the duration of the NRC’s program approvals. Quality assurance refers to the 

procedures and actions necessary to provide confidence that a system or component will perform 

satisfactorily. The quality assurance program changes will make the agency’s oversight more efficient 

and allow its focus to remain on reducing the risk of transportation incidents.

Other changes clarify the requirements for obtaining a general license, the responsibilities of 

general licensees, and the roles of applicants for a certificate of compliance, certificate holders, and 

users of certified transport packages.

The final rule will be published shortly in the Federal Register.
§ 23.0 Scope and application. ( a ) The guides in this part apply to jewelry industry products, which include, but are not limited to, the following: Gemstones and their laboratory-created and imitation substitutes; natural and cultured pearls and their imitations; and metallic watch bands not permanently attached to watches. These guides also apply to articles, including optical frames, pens and pencils, flatware, and hollowware, fabricated from precious metals (gold, silver, and platinum group metals), precious metal alloys, and their imitations. These guides also apply to all articles made from pewter. For the purposes of these guides, all articles covered by these guides are defined as “industry products.”
( b ) These guides apply to persons, partnerships, or corporations, at every level of the trade (including but not limited to manufacturers, suppliers, and retailers) engaged in the business of offering for sale, selling, or distributing industry products. Note to paragraph ( b
):
To prevent consumer deception, persons, partnerships, or corporations in the business of appraising, identifying, or grading industry products should utilize the terminology and standards set forth in the guides.
( c ) These guides apply to claims and representations about industry products included in labeling, advertising, promotional materials, and all other forms of marketing, whether asserted directly or by implication, through words, symbols, emblems, logos, illustrations, depictions, product brand names, or through any other means.
( d ) These guides set forth the Federal Trade Commission's current thinking about claims for jewelry and articles made from precious metals and pewter. The guides help marketers and other industry members avoid making claims that are unfair or deceptive under Section 5 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 45. They do not confer any rights on any person and do not operate to bind the FTC or the public. The Commission, however, may take action under the FTC Act if a marketer or other industry member makes a claim inconsistent with the guides. In any such enforcement action, the Commission must prove that the challenged act or practice is unfair or deceptive in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act.
( e ) The guides consist of general principles, specific guidance on the use of particular claims for industry products, and examples. Claims may raise issues that are addressed by more than one example and in more than one section of the guides. The examples provide the Commission's views on how reasonable consumers likely interpret certain claims. Industry members may use an alternative approach if the approach satisfies the requirements of Section 5 of the FTC Act. Whether a particular claim is deceptive will depend on the net impression of the advertisement, label, or other promotional material at issue. In addition, although many examples present specific claims and options for qualifying claims, the examples do not illustrate all permissible claims or qualifications under Section 5 of the FTC Act.