alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE****SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Michael M. Megless, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Spectrum Sciences & Software HoldingsCorp.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s second fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     By: /s/ Michael M. Megless   Michael M. Megless  Chief Financial Officer  Spectrum Sciences & Software Holdings Corp.  Date: August 14, 2006
29
Order entered January 11, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01247-CR

RUSTY LYLE WHITE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 78th District Court

Wichita County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 59,739-B

ORDER

Appellant, who was convicted of aggravated sexual assault of a child, filed his brief on 

January 7, 2019. In the brief, he uses the name of a victim who was a child at the time of the 

offense. Accordingly, we STRIKE appellant’s brief.

We ORDER appellant to file, within TEN DAYS of the date of this order, an amended 

brief that identify any victim either generically (“victim” or “complaining witness”) or by initials 

only, including when quoting portions of the record.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to Greg Merkle and the Wichita 

County District Attorney’s Office.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III 

JUSTICE
### §1320c–20. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–35, title XXI, §2113(k), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 795

Section, act Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XI, §1171, as added Oct. 25, 1977, Pub. L. 95–142, §5(d)(2)(D), 91 Stat. 1186, set forth provisions respecting Federal-State relations regarding memorandum of understanding between Organization and State agency.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable to agreements with Professional Standards Review Organizations entered into on or after Oct. 1, 1981, see section 2113(o) of Pub. L. 97–35, set out as an Effective Date of 1981 Amendment note under section 1396a of this title.
No: I-15-016 April 13, 2015

CONTACT: Diane Screnci 610-337-5330

 Neil Sheehan 610-337-5331

NRC Sends Special Inspection Team to Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has begun a special inspection at the Calvert Cliffs 

nuclear power plant to review issues during the unplanned shutdown of both reactors on April 7. The

plant, which is operated by Exelon, is located in Lusby, Md. 

Calvert Cliffs, like all nuclear power plants, transmits power to the grid but also receives 

power back for operational purposes. A grid disturbance due the failure of a transmission line in 

Southern Maryland on April 7th caused both Calvert Cliffs reactors to automatically shut down as 

designed. 

Following the grid disturbance, one of Unit 2’s emergency diesel generators (which provide 

power to safety systems when off-site power is lost) started, but tripped after 11 seconds. This same 

diesel generator failed to start in 2010 after a loss of off-site power. In addition, one of three saltwater 

pumps on Unit 2 failed to automatically restart when power switched to the emergency diesel 

generators. Per procedure, operators manually started the pump, which provides cooling water to 

certain plant equipment. 

“While there was no impact on public health and safety, the issues with the emergency diesel 

generator and the saltwater pump warrant a closer look,” said Dan Dorman, NRC Region I 

Administrator. 

The three-member team that arrived on-site today is tasked with developing a sequence of 

events; reviewing and assessing equipment response to the event; reviewing operator performance; and 

assessing the effectiveness of Exelon’s response to this event. 

An inspection report documenting the team’s findings will be issued within 45 days of the end 

of the inspection.
Exhibit 13.2










Certification


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies in her capacity as an officer of Global Sources Ltd. (the “Company”) that the Annual Report of the Company on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of and for the periods covered by such Report.






Dated: June 27, 2011


/s/ Connie LaiConnie LaiChief Financial Officer




The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 1350(a) and (b)), is not a part of the Form 20-F to which it refers and is, to the extent permitted by law, provided by the above signatory to the extent of her knowledge.




A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO GLOBAL SOURCES LTD. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY GLOBAL SOURCES. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### SEP 22 1998 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
VINCENT JAMES ZURLA,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v. TIM LEMASTER, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

Respondents-Appellees. No. 98-2008 (D.C. No. CIV-97-841-JP/LFG)

(D. N.M.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before PORFILIO , KELLY , and HENRY , Circuit Judges.

After examining petitioner’s brief and the appellat e record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would notmaterially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral ar gument.-2-

Petitioner, a prisoner of the State of New Mexico appearing pro se, appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition fo r writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court a lso denied a certificate of appealability. Before petitioner may proceed on appeal, he must se cure a certificate of appealability from this court. See id. § 2253(c)(1)(A). Raising the same issues he raised in the district court, petitioner argues that this court should grant a certificate of appealability because: (1) the Stat e’s failure to file an amended supplemental information charging him as a habitual offender deprived him of due process; (2) the State violated the plea agreem ent by failing to give him the benefit of one less habitual offender enhancement; (3) the eight-and-one-half months’ delay between his probation violation arrai gnment and the probation violation hearing violated due process; and (4) his counsel at the probation violation hearing was ineffective because counsel f ailed to preserve issues for appeal and failed to properly prepare for the probation violation hearing. Upon consideration of the record and petitioner’s b rief, we conclude petitioner has failed to make “a substantial showin g of the denial of a constitutional right.” Id. § 2253(c)(2). We DENY petitioner’s request for a certificate of appealability for substantially the reasons stated by the magistrate judge in his findings and recommended disposition f iled September 12, 1997, and-3-

adopted by the district court on December 23, 1997. The appeal is DISMISSED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Paul J. Kelly, Jr. Circuit Judge
#### § 1507.5 Pyrotechnic leakage.

The pyrotechnic chamber in fireworks devices shall be sealed in a manner that prevents leakage of the pyrotechnic composition during shipping, handling, and normal operation.
#### In the Matter of Toni Frissell, Petitioner, against Joseph D. McGoldrick, as Comptroller of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.

Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 760.]
Bear Creek

Pryor Creek

Crooked Creek

Lost Creek

E lbow Creek

Jake F o rk

Barrett Creek

Little Creek

Long Creek

Cravens Creek

Neville Creek

Byrd Creek

Rayburn Creek

Pisgah Creek

Ginger Creek Bacon Creek

Taylor Creek

Smith Creek

Barnett Creek

Crocket t Creek

Pond Creek

Panther C reek

Shaw Branch

Turkey Creek

Hughes Creek

Hurrica ne Creek

Willow C reek

Clay Creek

Downs Branch

Franklin Creek

Dodds Creek

Dry Fork C reek

Demumbers Creek

Rhodes Creek

Lick C reek

Vickers Creek

Acree Creek

Green Branch

Jones Creek

Crab Creek

Higgins Branch

Middle Rushin g Creek

West Fork Laura Furnace Creek

North Fork Sugar Creek

Lick Creek

Long Creek

Rushing Bay Pryor Bay

Lick Creek

Tennessee River

Long Creek

Crooked Creek Duncan Bay

Cumberland River

Pisgah Bay

Lower 

Tennessee River

Lower 

Cumberland River

Mammoth Furnace Bay

Fulton Bay

Lost Creek

Panther Bay

Standing Rock

 Creek

0 2.5 5

Miles

Legend

Stream

Watershed

±

This product is produced from geospatial information

prepared by the USDA Forest Service. Source map

scales vary and accuracy of this product has not been

assessed. Using GIS products for purposes

other than those for which they were created may 

yield inaccurate or misleading results.

Prepared by US Forest Service

Land Between The Lakes

GIS Laboratory

September 2004

Level 6 Watersheds Land

NATIONAL RECREATION AREA

Between

The Lakes
EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Medina  International  Corp.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31,2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Nick
DeMare, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Nick DeMare
-----------------------
Nick DeMare
Chief Financial Officer




<PAGE>
ORIGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 24-0344 

GERALD A. UNRUH and MICHAL L. UNRUH, 

Plaintiffs and Appellees, 

v. 

URBAN LIFESTYLE 10 LLC, a Washington 

State limited liability company, 

Defendant and Appellant. 

PILED 

SEP 2 5 2024 

Bowen 

Clerk Green-wood of 

State Supreme Court of 'Montane 

ORDER 

Through counsel, Appellees Gerald A. Unruh and Michal L. Unruh (collectively, 

Unruh) move this Court for dismissal of this appeal because Appellant Urban Lifestyle 10 

LLC (Urban) does not have counsel to represent it. No response has been filed. 

This appeal is before this Court on the Yellowstone County District Court's granting 

of Unruh's motion for summary judgment on their first amended cross-complaint against 

Urban. The caption was changed in the filed Notice of Appeal.' This Court also observes 

that counsel for Urban moved for withdrawal on August 14, 2024, and this Court issued an 

order granting withdrawal on the same day. 

As grounds for the motion, Unruh explains that the legal liability company, or LLC, 

must have legal counsel as its members cannot represent the entity. Ioerger v. Reiner, 2005 

MT 155, ¶ 20, 327 Mont. 424, 114 P.3d 1028. Citing Montana case law, Unruh maintains 

that a non-lawyer cannot represent a legal entity in a court and that an LLC is a separate 

legal entity, requiring representation of counsel. Rafes v. McMillan, 2022 MT 13, ¶¶ 20, 

21, 407 Mont. 254, 502 P.3d 674 (citation omitted). 

The underlying matter had the caption of Marvin Wayne Jewett ABN A-1 Drilling v. Gerald A. 

Unruh, Michal L. Unruh, and Urban Lifestyle 10, LLC, Cause No. DV 22-1356. 

09/25/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0344
Upon review, we conclude that dismissal of this appeal is appropriate. No other 

counsel has filed a notice of appearance for Urban with this Court, and the appeal cannot 

proceed. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that Unruh's Motion to Dismiss Appeal is GRANTED and this 

appeal is DISMISSED. 

The Clerk also is directed to provide a copy of this Order to counsel of record; to 

appointed mediator Charles R. Cashmore, and to Urban Lifestyle 10 LLC at its last known 

address. Er, 

DATED thisekc day of September, 2024. 

2
§ 301.44 Misrepresentation of prices. ( a ) No person shall, with respect to a fur or fur product, advertise such fur or fur product at alleged wholesale prices or at alleged manufacturers cost or less, unless such representations are true in fact; nor shall any person advertise a fur or fur product at prices purported to be reduced from what are in fact fictitious prices, nor at a purported reduction in price when such purported reduction is in fact fictitious.
( b ) No person shall, with respect to a fur or fur product, advertise such fur or fur product with comparative prices and percentage savings claims except on the basis of current market values or unless the time of such compared price is given.
( c ) No person shall, with respect to a fur or fur product, advertise such fur or fur product as being “made to sell for”, being “worth” or “valued at” a certain price, or by similar statements, unless such claim or representation is true in fact.
( d ) No person shall, with respect to a fur or fur product, advertise such fur or fur product as being of a certain value or quality unless such claims or representations are true in fact.
( e ) Persons making pricing claims or representations of the types described in paragraphs (a), (b), (c) and (d) of this section shall maintain full and adequate records disclosing the facts upon which such claims or representations are based.
( f ) No person shall, with respect to a fur or fur product, advertise such fur or fur product by the use of an illustration which shows such fur or fur product to be a higher priced product than the one so advertised.
( g ) No person shall, with respect to a fur or fur product, advertise such fur or fur product as being “bankrupt stock”, “samples”, “show room models”, “Hollywood Models”, “Paris Models”, “French Models”, “Parisian Creations”, “Furs Worn by Society Women”, “Clearance Stock”, “Auction Stock”, “Stock of a business in a state of liquidation”, or similar statements, unless such representations or claims are true in fact.
#### § 300.6 Labels to be avoided.

Stamps, tags, labels, or other marks of identification, which are insecurely attached, or which in the course of offering the product for sale, selling, reselling, transporting, marketing, or handling incident thereto are likely to become detached, indistinct, obliterated, illegible, mutilated, inaccessible, or inconspicuous, shall not be used.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3698 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3698

  To direct the Secretary of State to designate Iran's Revolutionary 
    Guard Corps as a foreign terrorist organization, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 16, 2011

  Mr. McCaul (for himself, Mr. Mack, Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia, Mr. 
   Schock, Mr. Young of Indiana, Mr. Harper, Mr. Frelinghuysen, Mr. 
Peterson, Mr. Walsh of Illinois, Mr. Poe of Texas, Mr. Thornberry, Mr. 
 Olson, Mr. King of New York, Mrs. Miller of Michigan, Mr. Carter, Mr. 
 Farenthold, and Mr. Rohrabacher) introduced the following bill; which 
was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the 
     Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Secretary of State to designate Iran's Revolutionary 
    Guard Corps as a foreign terrorist organization, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF IRAN'S REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS AS A FOREIGN 
              TERRORIST ORGANIZATION.

    The Secretary of State shall designate Iran's Revolutionary Guard 
Corps as a foreign terrorist organization under section 219 of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189).

SEC. 2. REPORT.

    The Secretary of State shall submit to the Committee on Foreign 
Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign 
Relations of the Senate a report on terrorist activities of Iran's 
Revolutionary Guard Corps.
                                 <all>
```
§ 303.15 Required label and method of affixing. ( a ) A label is required to be affixed to each textile product and, where required, to its package or container in a secure manner. Such label shall be conspicuous and shall be of such durability as to remain attached to the product and its package throughout any distribution, sale, resale and until sold and delivered to the ultimate consumer.
( b ) Each textile fiber product with a neck must have a label disclosing the country of origin affixed to the inside center of the neck midway between the shoulder seams or in close proximity to another label affixed to the inside center of the neck. The fiber content and RN or name of the company may be disclosed on the same label as the country of origin or on another conspicuous and readily accessible label or labels on the inside or outside of the garment. On all other textile products, the required information shall be disclosed on a conspicuous and readily accessible label or labels on the inside or outside of the product. The country of origin disclosure must always appear on the front side of the label. Other required information may appear either on the front side or the reverse side of a label, provided that the information is conspicuous and readily accessible.
( c ) In the case of hosiery products, this section shall not be construed as requiring the affixing of a label to each hosiery product contained in a package if, ( 1 ) Such hosiery products are intended for sale to the ultimate consumer in such package,
( 2 ) Such package has affixed to it a label bearing the required information for the hosiery products contained in the package, and
( 3 ) The information on the label affixed to the package is equally applicable to each textile fiber product contained therein.
( d ) Socks provided for in subheading 6115.92.90, 6115.93.90, 6115.99.18, 6111.20.60, 6111.30.50, or 6111.90.50 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, as in effect on September 1, 2003, shall be marked, as legibly, indelibly, and permanently as the nature of the article or package will permit, to disclose the English name of the country of origin. This disclosure shall appear on the front of the package, adjacent to the size designation of the product, and shall be set forth in such a manner as to be clearly legible, conspicuous, and readily accessible to the ultimate consumer. *Provided, however,* any package that contains several different types of goods and includes socks classified under subheading 6115.92.90, 6115.93.90, 6115.99.18, 6111.20.60, 6111.30.50, or 6111.90.50 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, as in effect on September 1, 2003, shall not be subject to the requirements of this subsection.
[50 FR 15106, Apr. 17, 1985, as amended at 63 FR 7518, Feb. 13, 1998; 70 FR 73369, Dec. 12, 2005]
EXHIBIT 99.2
                                                                    ------------






                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


I, Marc J. Venator, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer (principal financial
officer) of Precise Software Solutions, Ltd. (the "Registrant"), certify, to the
best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the period ended December 31, 2002 of the Registrant (the "Report"), that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained and incorporated by reference in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.


/s/ Marc J. Venator
-------------------------
Name: Marc J. Venator
Date: March 13, 2003