alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

I, Chang H. Ahn, Chief Executive Officer of Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date: August 23, 2005

 

/s/ Chang H. Ahn          

Chang H. Ahn

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

----
#### §§ 149.141-149.148 [Reserved]
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-18-0022:  Denial of Petitions for Rulemaking Related to Calculated Maximum Fuel Element Cladding Temperature (PRM-50-93 and PRM-50-95)

Accession Number: ML14308A066

Date Released: Wednesday, January 6, 2021

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML14308A138 - SECY-18-0022: Denial of Petitions for Rulemaking on Calculated Maximum Fuel Element Cladding Temperature (PRM-50-93 and PRM-50-95; NRC-2009-0554) (10 page(s), 2/14/2018)
    - ML14308A098 - SECY-18-0022:  Enclosure 1 - Federal Register Notice - Petitions for Rulemaking; Denial - PRM-50-93 and PRM-50-95 (Calculated Maximum Fuel Element Cladding Temperature) (33 page(s), 2/14/2018)
    - ML14308A119 - SECY-18-0022:  Enclosure 2 - PRM-50-93 and PRM-50-95 - Letter to Mr. Mark Edward Leyse, Petitioner, from Annette Vietti-Cook, Denial of Petitions for Rulemaking RE: Calculated Maximum Fuel Element Cladding Temperature (3 page(s), 2/14/2018)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### § 1117.3 Reportable information.

A subject firm shall report any information it obtains which reasonably supports the conclusion that a reportable incident occurred. Generally, firms should report any information provided to the company, orally or in writing, which states that a child choked on a marble, small ball, latex balloon, or on a marble, small ball, latex balloon or other small part contained in a toy or game *and,* as a result of that incident the child died, suffered serious injury, ceased breathing for any length of time, or was treated by a medical professional. Subject firms must not wait until they have investigated the incident or conclusively resolved whether the information is accurate or whether their product was involved in the incident. Firms shall not wait to determine conclusively the cause of the death, injury, cessation of breathing or necessity for treatment. An allegation that such a result followed the choking incident is sufficient to require a report.
No: II-16-005 March 8, 2016

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416 

NRC Schedules Open House to Discuss Catawba Nuclear Plant 2015 Performance

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled an open house for Wednesday, March 16, to 

discuss the agency’s assessment of the Catawba nuclear plant’s two units during 2015.

The plant, operated by Duke Energy, is located near York, S.C., about 18 miles south of Charlotte, N.C.

 

The open house, which will include informational posters, is scheduled from 6 to 7 p.m. at the Rock Hill 

City Hall, 155 Johnston St., Rock Hill, S.C. 

NRC resident inspectors and other staff members will be available to answer questions on the safety 

performance and regulatory oversight of the Catawba plant, as well as highlights of NRC inspections. 

“We invite the public to visit with us and find out what we’re doing to ensure Catawba and other nuclear 

plants are operated safely,” said NRC Region II Administrator Cathy Haney. “These annual meetings offer an 

opportunity for everyone, and especially people who live near the plant, to learn about our inspection and 

oversight programs.”

An NRC letter to plant officials addressing 2015 Catawba plant performance will serve as the main focus 

of the open house, but NRC staff members will be available to answer other questions about the NRC’s role at 

the plant. 

The NRC review of the Catawba plant for 2015 concluded that the plant operated in a manner that 

preserved public health and safety and protected the environment. Because of that performance, it will continue 

to receive the detailed routine or baseline inspections this year that all nuclear power plants receive.

The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess plant performance. 

The colors start with green, which has very low safety significance, and then progress to white, yellow or red, 

based on the significance of the issues. All findings and performance indicators for Catawba were green during 

the 2015 assessment period.

Current performance information for both Catawba Unit 1 and Unit 2, as well as more detailed 

information about NRC inspection and oversight, is available at www.nrc.gov. Specific plant performance 

indicators and inspection reports are updated at least quarterly.
§ 1611.33 Test procedures for textile fabrics and film. ( a ) ( 1 ) All textile fabrics (except those with a nitro-cellulose fiber, finish or coating) intended or sold for use in wearing apparel, and all such fabrics contained in articles of wearing apparel, shall be subject to the requirements of the act, and shall be deemed to be so highly flammable as to be dangerous when worn by individuals if such fabrics or any uncovered or exposed part of such articles of wearing apparel exhibits rapid and intense burning when tested under the conditions and in the manner prescribed in subpart A of this part, and identified as “Flammability of Clothing Textiles, Commercial Standard 191-53”.
( 2 ) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a)(1) of this section, coated fabrics, except those with a nitro-cellulose coating, may be tested under the procedures outlined in part 1611, the flammability standard incorporated in the Commercial Standard promulgated by the Secretary of Commerce effective May 22, 1953, and identified as “General Purpose Vinyl Plastic Film, Commercial Standard 192-53”, and if such coated fabrics do not exhibit a rate of burning in excess of that specified in § 1611.3 they shall not be deemed to be so highly flammable as to be dangerous when worn by individuals.
( b ) All film, and textile fabrics with a nitro-cellulose fiber, finish or coating intended or sold for use in wearing apparel, and all film and such textile fabrics referred to in this rule which are contained in articles of wearing apparel, shall be subject to the requirements of the act, and shall be deemed to be so highly flammable as to be dangerous when worn by individuals if such film or such textile fabrics or any uncovered or exposed part of such articles of wearing apparel exhibit a rate of burning in excess of that specified in part 1611, the flammability standard incorporated in the Commercial Standard promulgated by the Secretary of Commerce effective May 22, 1953, and identified as “General Purpose Vinyl Plastic Film, Commercial Standard 192-53.”
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of the Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Inergy Holdings, L.P. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, R. Brooks Sherman, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of Inergy Holdings, L.P., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    R. Brooks Sherman, Jr.R. Brooks Sherman, Jr.Chief Financial OfficerAugust 9, 2005




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 (the Form 10-QSB) of Surrey Bancorp (the Company), we, Edward C. Ashby, III, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and Mark H.Towe, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:



(a) the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(b) the
information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Form 10-QSB.



|    |  |                           |  |                        
|--- |  | ------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Edward C. Ashby, III. |  | Date: November 12, 2004
|    |  | Edward C. Ashby, III.     |  |                        
|    |  | President and             |  |                        
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer   |  |                        
|    |  |                          
|By: |  | /s/ Mark H. Towe          |  | Date: November 12, 2004
|    |  | Mark H. Towe              |  |                        
|    |  | Sr. Vice-President and    |  |                        
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer   |  |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Office of the Secretary 

          - [GWCRC Meeting Notice No. 1-04] 

The Guam War Claims Review Commission, pursuant to section 10 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 10), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of meetings for the transaction of Commission business, as follows: 

*Date and Time:*                     Thursday, February 19, 2004, at 4 p.m., and Friday, February 20, 2004, at 10 a.m.                 

*Place:*                     Thursday, February 19, 2004: 600 E St., NW., Room 6002, Washington, DC; Friday, February 20, 2004: Grand Hyatt Hotel, 1000 H St., NW., Washington, DC.                 

*Subject Matter:*                     Thursday, February 19, 2004: administrative and organizational matters; Friday, February 20, 2004: public meetings at which to elicit and hear advice, opinion, and insights from legal experts concerning the recognition and payment of American nationals' claims for personal injury, death, forced labor, internment, and property loss and damage in areas occupied by Imperial Japanese forces during World War II.                 

*Status:*                     Open.                 

Requests for information concerning these meetings should be addressed to David Bradley, Executive Director, Guam War Claims Review Commission, c/o Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States, 600 E St., NW., Washington DC 20579, telephone (202)616-6975, FAX (202)616-6993. 

Mauricio J. Tamargo, 

Chairman. 

[FR Doc. 04-2643 Filed 2-6-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-93-P
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3775 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3775

                  To provide dollars to the classroom.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 17, 2012

  Mr. Pitts introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                  To provide dollars to the classroom.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Dollars to the Classroom Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON USE BY STATES OF FEDERAL FUNDS PROVIDED FOR 
              ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, not less than 95 
percent of any Federal funds made available to a State or State 
educational agency by the Secretary of Education for a purpose relating 
to elementary or secondary education shall be used for--
            (1) academic purposes; and
            (2) classroom, or classroom-related, purposes or at the 
        school level.
                                 <all>
```
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 7488** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. RODNEY EDWARD STEWART , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Weste rn District of Virginia , at Abingdon
. James P. Jones , District Judge. ( 1:06

- cr - 00046

- JPJ

- 1; 1:10

- cv - 80213

- JPJ )

Submitted : March 5, 2012 Decided: March 16, 2012

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curi am opinion
. Rodney Edward Stewart , Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer R. Bockhorst, Assistant U nited S tates Attorney , Abingdon, V irginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Rodney Edward Stewart seeks t o appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2011 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate o f appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on pro cedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently review ed the record and conclude that Stewart has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 c ontentions are adequately presented in the mater ials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
### §10244. Environmental assessment of sites

#### (a) In general

Upon the request of the Negotiator, the Secretary shall prepare an environmental assessment of any site that is the subject of negotiations under section 10243(a) of this title.

#### (b) Contents

(1) Each environmental assessment prepared for a repository site shall include a detailed statement of the probable impacts of characterizing such site and the construction and operation of a repository at such site.

(2) Each environmental assessment prepared for a monitored retrievable storage facility site shall include a detailed statement of the probable impacts of construction and operation of such a facility at such site.

#### (c) Judicial review

The issuance of an environmental assessment under subsection (a) shall be considered to be a final agency action subject to judicial review in accordance with the provisions of chapter 7 of title 5 and section 10139 of this title.

#### (d) Public hearings

(1) In preparing an environmental assessment for any repository or monitored retrievable storage facility site, the Secretary shall hold public hearings in the vicinity of such site to inform the residents of the area in which such site is located that such site is being considered and to receive their comments.

(2) At such hearings, the Secretary shall solicit and receive any recommendations of such residents with respect to issues that should be addressed in the environmental assessment required under subsection (a) and the site characterization plan described in section 10133(b)(1) of this title.

#### (e) Public availability

Each environmental assessment prepared under subsection (a) shall be made available to the public.

#### (f) Evaluation of sites

(1) In preparing an environmental assessment under subsection (a), the Secretary shall use available geophysical, geologic, geochemical and hydrologic, and other information and shall not conduct any preliminary borings or excavations at any site that is the subject of such assessment unless—

(A) such preliminary boring or excavation activities were in progress on or before December 22, 1987; or

(B) the Secretary certifies that, in the absence of preliminary borings or excavations, adequate information will not be available to satisfy the requirements of this chapter or any other law.

(2) No preliminary boring or excavation conducted under this section shall exceed a diameter of 40 inches.

(Pub. L. 97–425, title IV, §404, as added Pub. L. 100–202, §101(d) [title III], Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1329–104, 1329–121; Pub. L. 100–203, title V, §5041, Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–245.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 100–202 and Pub. L. 100–203 added identical sections.
§ 1145.3 Extremely flammable contact adhesives; risk of burns from explosive vapor ignition and flashback fire. ( a ) The Commission finds that it is in the public interest to regulate the risk of burns from explosive vapor ignition and flashback fire associated with certain extremely flammable contact adhesives under the Consumer Product Safety Act rather than under the Federal Hazardous Substances Act because of the desirability of avoiding possibly lengthy, resource consuming, and inefficient rulemaking proceedings under the Federal Hazardous Substances Act and because of the availability of civil penalties under the CPSA. The Commission also believes that the complexity and formality of the rulemaking proceedings under the FHSA, in contrast to rulemaking proceedings under the CPSA may make it difficult for interested persons to participate.
( b ) Extremely flammable contact adhesives and other similar liquid or semi-liquid products in containers over one-half pint that present a risk of burns from explosive vapor ignition and flashback fire shall therefore be regulated under the Consumer Product Safety Act. Such regulation shall include all directly related pending and future rulemaking, as well as all directly related future action on petitions. However, such action shall not include labeling that may be required under the Federal Hazardous Substances Act to address flammability hazards associated with other adhesives not subject to the ban.
[42 FR 63731, Dec. 19, 1977]