alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONI, David G. Powers certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of United Heritage Bankshares of Florida,Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.       Date: August 8, 2006 By: /s/ David G. Powers David G. Powers, President and Chief      Executive Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 21.1     **Jurisdiction of****Entity Name** **Incorporation**   **XO Holdings, Inc.** **Delaware**   **XO Holdings, Inc. Subsidiaries:**  LMDS Holdings, Inc. DelawareV & K Holdings. DelawareXO Communications, LLC. Delaware   **XO Communications, LLC Subsidiaries:**  LHP Equipment, Inc. DelawareXO Communications Services, Inc. DelawareXO Interactive, Inc. WashingtonXO International Holdings, Inc. DelawareXO Services, Inc. DelawareXO Nevada Merger Sub, Inc Delaware50% Interest in Telecommunications of Nevada, L.L.C. DelawareXO Management Services, Inc WashingtonXO Global Communications, Inc DelawareCoast to Coast Telecommunications, Inc. DelawareXO Long Distance Services (Virginia), LLC Delaware   **XO Communications Services, Inc. Subsidiaries:**  XO Intercity Holdings No. 1, LLC. WashingtonXO Mindshare, LLC. WashingtonXO Virginia, LLC. Washington   **XO Management Services, Inc. Subsidiary:**  XO Management Services Nevada, Inc. Washington   **XO International Holdings, Inc. Subsidiaries:**  XO International, Inc. DelawareNextlink Global ApS Denmark99% Interest in XO Asia Limited Hong Kong   **XO International, Inc. Subsidiaries:**  1% Interest in XO Asia Limited Hong Kong   **XO Intercity Holdings No. 1, LLC Subsidiaries:**  XO Data Services, LLC. DelawareXO Intercity Holdings No. 2, LLC Delaware   **XO Nevada Merger Sub., Inc. Subsidiary:**  50% Interest in Telecommunications of Nevada, L.L.C. Delaware
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Warren Smith, Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 545]

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Braslow, J.), imposed January 5, 2005, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed. No opinion. Adams J.P., Krausman, Spolzino and Lunn, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annaul Report of NANNACO, Inc., a Texas corporation (the
"Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Steve Careaga, Principal
Executive and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify,
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that
to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Steve Careaga
-----------------
Steve Careaga
Principal Executive Officer
April 14, 2005


/s/ Steve Careaga
-----------------
Steve Careaga
Principal Financial Officer
April 14, 2005


[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to NANNACO, Inc. and will be retained by Nannaco, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]


                                      E-3
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CepTor  Corporation,  (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB for  quarterly  period  ended  March 31,  2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
H. Pursley,  Chairman of the Board and Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of 15 (d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

May 22, 2006

                                         /s/ William H. Pursley
                                         ------------------------------------
                                         William H. Pursley
                                         Chairman of the Board and Chief
                                         Executive Officer
```
Exhibit
      32








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Zingo, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Holly Roseberry,
      Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
      to
      the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
      of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Holly
                RoseberryHolly RoseberryChief Executive Officer and
                Principal Financial
                  Officer





May
      23, 2007
**EXHIBIT 99.3**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. §1350,**

 

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of SierraWireless, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F/A for the period ended December 31,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,I, Jason W. Cohenour, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuantto 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date:  April 12,2006

 

 
| /s/  JASON W. COHENOUR   |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Jason  W. Cohenour       |
| Chief  Executive Officer |

 

1

----
#### Bessie Shinofsky, Appellant, v. Meyer Shinofsky, Respondent.

Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Michael Magnotta, Appellant, against Herbert C. Gerlach et al., Constituting the Board of Acquisition and Contract of the County of Westchester, Respondents, and Parkway Fleetwood Building, Inc., Third Party Respondent.

In our opinion the term *“*highest bid ” stated in the terms of sale must be coustrued to mean that bid which would yield to the county the largest net return for the property sold and under that construction the bid of $8,900 net to the county was a higher bid than that of $9,000, subject to a 5% deduction for brokerage. Acceptance by the Board of Acquisition and Contract of any bid other than the highest bid was an unauthorized and illegal act. The statement made at the sale by the county official conducting the sale that *“*the property would be knocked down to the highest bidder, broker or no broker ” was an unauthorized asserted modification of the terms of sale which had been published as required, which may well have misled bidders at the sale and prevented a fair sale upon an equal basis to all bidders, In the interests of justice we hold that the sale was not a valid *855sale at auction as required by act No. 20-1946 as amended by act No. 36-1946 and act No. 28-1948 of the Board of Supervisors of the county and the terms of sale as published. Johnston, Acting P. J., Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur; Adel, J., dissents and votes to affirm, with the following memorandum: Both seller and bidder are bound by the terms of sale under which the sale is conducted. The printed terms of sale provided that “the party offering the highest bid for said particular plot shall be required to execute a memorandum of sale ”, etc. In explanation the auctioneer announced “ that the property would be knocked down to the highest bidder, broker or no broker.” A bid, being an offer by an intending purchaser to pay a designated price, when accepted, under the terms of sale, amounts to a contract. The successful bidder here should not be denied the advantage of his bid because the public officials charged with the responsibility of conducting the sale may, as an incident of the sale, be liable to a broker for commissions. Such commissions are an expense of the sale and the officials had the right to treat them as such. Settle order on five days’ notice.
#### Razor Corporation et al., Respondents, v. Sam Goody, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent Capitol Records, Inc. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Breitel and Bastow, JJ.
#### § 1000.24 Office of International Programs and Intergovernmental Affairs.

The Office of International Programs and Intergovernmental Affairs provides a comprehensive and coordinated effort in consumer product safety standards development and implementation at the international, Federal, State and local level. The office conducts activities and creates strategies aimed at ensuring greater import compliance with recognized American safety standards and exportation of CPSC regulatory policies, technologies and methodologies into other jurisdictions. The office also works to harmonize the use of standards worldwide.
§ 316.4 Requirement to place warning labels on commercial electronic mail that contains sexually oriented material. ( a ) Any person who initiates, to a protected computer, the transmission of a commercial electronic mail message that includes sexually oriented material must: ( 1 ) Exclude sexually oriented materials from the subject heading for the electronic mail message and include in the subject heading the phrase “SEXUALLY-EXPLICIT: ” in capital letters as the first nineteen (19) characters at the beginning of the subject line;[2]
( 2 ) Provide that the content of the message that is initially viewable by the recipient, when the message is opened by any recipient and absent any further actions by the recipient, include only the following information: ( i ) The phrase “SEXUALLY-EXPLICIT: ” in a clear and conspicuous manner;[3]
( ii ) Clear and conspicuous identification that the message is an advertisement or solicitation;
( iii ) Clear and conspicuous notice of the opportunity of a recipient to decline to receive further commercial electronic mail messages from the sender;
( iv ) A functioning return electronic mail address or other Internet-based mechanism, clearly and conspicuously displayed, that ( A ) A recipient may use to submit, in a manner specified in the message, a reply electronic mail message or other form of Internet-based communication requesting not to receive future commercial electronic mail messages from that sender at the electronic mail address where the message was received; and
( B ) Remains capable of receiving such messages or communications for no less than 30 days after the transmission of the original message;
( v ) Clear and conspicuous display of a valid physical postal address of the sender; and
( vi ) Any needed instructions on how to access, or activate a mechanism to access, the sexually oriented material, preceded by a clear and conspicuous statement that to avoid viewing the sexually oriented material, a recipient should delete the email message without following such instructions.
( b ) *Prior affirmative consent.* Paragraph (a) does not apply to the transmission of an electronic mail message if the recipient has given prior affirmative consent to receipt of the message.
Footnotes -
316.4
[2] The phrase “SEXUALLY-EXPLICIT” comprises 17 characters, including the dash between the two words. The colon (:) and the space following the phrase are the 18th and 19th characters.
[3] This phrase consists of nineteen (19) characters and is identical to the phrase required in 316.5(a)(1) of this Rule.
### SUBCHAPTER VII—NUTRITION PROGRAM FOR THE ELDERLY
August 9, 2016 

The Honorable Jason Chaffetz 

Chairman, Committee on Oversight 

 and Government Reform 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

Dear Mr. Chairman: 

 On behalf of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), I am responding to your 

letter of July 26, 2016, seeking documentation regarding NRC implementation of the Federal 

Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2015 and the Federal Information Security Management Act. 

Responses to your eight specific inquiries are enclosed. Documents referenced in the 

enclosure are provided in electronic format on two compact discs accompanying this letter 

(labeled publicly available information and non-publicly available information). We respectfully 

request that you honor the markings on the non-public documents. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or Eugene Dacus, Director of 

the Office of Congressional Affairs, at (301) 415-1776. 

Sincerely, 

/RA/ 

Stephen G. Burns 

Enclosures: 

As stated 

cc: Representative Elijah E. Cummings
UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 

July 19, 2016 

 IN RESPONSE, PLEASE 

 REFER TO: M160707 

 

MEMORANDUM TO: Victor M. McCree 

 Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Annette Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS – STRATEGIC PROGRAMMATIC 

OVERVIEW OF THE OPERATING REACTOR BUSINESS LINE, 

9:30 A.M., THURSDAY, JULY 7, 2016, COMMISSIONERS’ 

CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH, 

ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND (OPEN TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE) 

The Commission was briefed by NRC staff on strategic considerations associated with the 

Operating Reactors Business Line. 

There were no requirements identified for staff action. 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Baran 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA 

 OIG 

 OPA 

 ODs, RAs, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR
#### § 311.6 Prohibited acts.

It is unlawful for any manufacturer or other seller to represent, on a label on a container of processed used oil, that such oil is substantially equivalent to new oil for use as engine oil unless the manufacturer or other seller has based such representation on the manufacturer's determination that the processed used oil is substantially equivalent to new oil for use as engine oil in accordance with the NIST test procedures prescribed under § 311.4 of this part. Violations will be subject to enforcement through civil penalties (as adjusted for inflation pursuant to § 1.98 of this chapter), imprisonment, and/or injunctive relief in accordance with the enforcement provisions of Section 525 of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6395).

[60 FR 55421, Oct. 31, 1995, as amended at 65 FR 69666, Nov. 20, 2000]
### §11318. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this subchapter $3,000,000 for fiscal year 2010 and such sums as may be necessary for fiscal years 2011. Any amounts appropriated to carry out this subchapter shall remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 100–77, title II, §208, as added Pub. L. 111–22, div. B, §1004(a)(6), May 20, 2009, 123 Stat. 1668.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 11318, Pub. L. 100–77, title II, §208, July 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 489; Pub. L. 100–628, title II, §204, Nov. 7, 1988, 102 Stat. 3228; Pub. L. 101–645, title I, §102, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4674; Pub. L. 102–550, title XIV, §1421, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4043, which authorized appropriations for fiscal years 1993 and 1994, was repealed by Pub. L. 111–22, div. B, §1004(a)(6), (b), May 20, 2009, 123 Stat. 1668, effective on, and applicable beginning on, May 20, 2009.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on, and applicable beginning on, May 20, 2009, see section 1004(b) of Pub L. 111–22, set out as an Effective Date of 2009 Amendment note under section 11311 of this title.
#### § 16.06 Errors or omissions.

Unless otherwise approved by the Commission or its designee, reporting markets shall file corrections to errors or omissions in data previously filed with the Commission pursuant to §§ 16.00 and 16.01 in the format and using the coding structure and electronic data submission procedures approved in writing by the Commission or its designee.

[71 FR 37819, July 3, 2006]
#### Theodore G. Peck, Jr., Respondent, v. Charles B. Toole, Appellant.

Judgment and order reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event, unless plaintiff stipulates to reduce verdict to $1,436.14; in which event judgment as so modified and order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Order to be settled on notice. Present—Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Smith, JJ.
§ 148.6 Allowable fees and expenses. ( a ) Awards will be based on rates customarily charged by persons engaged in the business of acting as attorneys, agents and expert witnesses, even if the services were made available without charge or at a reduced rate to the applicant.
( b ) No award for the fee of an attorney or agent under these rules may exceed $75 per hour. No award to compensate an expert witness may exceed the maximum daily rate prescribed for GS-18 under section 5332 of title 5 of the U.S. Code. However, an award may also include the reasonable expenses of the attorney, agent, or witness as a separate item, if the attorney, agent or witness ordinarily charges clients separately for such expenses.
( c ) In determining the reasonableness of the fee sought for an attorney, agent or expert witness, the Presiding Officer shall consider the following: ( 1 ) If the attorney, agent or witness is in private practice, his or her customary fee for similar services, or, if an employee of the applicant, the fully allocated cost of the services;
( 2 ) The prevailing rate for similar services in the community in which the attorney, agent or witness ordinarily performs services;
( 3 ) The time actually spent in the representation of the applicant;
( 4 ) The time reasonably spent in light of the difficulty or complexity of the issues in the adjudicatory proceeding; and
( 5 ) Such other factors as may bear on the value of the services provided.
( d ) The reasonable cost of any study, analysis, test, project or similar matter prepared on behalf of a party may be awarded, to the extent that the charge for the service does not exceed the prevailing rate for similar services, and the study or other matter was necessary for preparation of the applicant's case.
### §13031. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 13031 was editorially reclassified as section 20341 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
§ 803.4 Foreign persons refusing to file notification. ( a ) In an acquisition to which § 801.30 does not apply, and in which no assets (other than investment assets) located in the United States and no voting securities of a United States issuer will be acquired directly or indirectly, if a foreign acquired person refuses to file notification, then any other person which is a party to the acquisition may file notification on behalf of the foreign person. Such notification shall constitute the notification required of the foreign person by the act and these rules.
( b ) Any person filing on behalf of the foreign person pursuant to this section must state in the affidavit required by § 803.5(b) that such foreign person has refused to file notification and must explain all efforts made by the person filing on behalf of the foreign person to obtain compliance with the act and these rules by such foreign person.
( c ) Any notification filed on behalf of a foreign person pursuant to this section must contain all information and documentary material reasonably available to the person filing on behalf of the foreign person which such foreign person would be required to provide. Whenever information or documentary material is not reasonably available, the person filing on behalf of the foreign person shall so indicate on the Notification and Report Form, and need not supply the statement of reasons for noncompliance required by § 803.3.
( d ) Any foreign person on whose behalf notification has been filed by another person pursuant to this section shall be a “person filing notification” for purposes of the act and these rules. Nothing in this section shall exempt a foreign person from the requirements of the act or these rules with respect to a request for additional information or an extension of the waiting period pursuant to section 7A(e) and these rules.