alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 10.19**

**BASE SALARIES OFEXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY**

As of October 1, 2006, the followingare the base salaries (on an annual basis) of the executive officers of NetworkEngines, Inc.:
| Name and Title                                                                          | ** ** | **Base Salary** | ** ** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|----------------------|------------|
|                                                                                              |       |                 |       |
| Gregory A. Shortell                                                                               |       | $                    | 350,000    |   |
| *President, Chief Executive Officer and Director*                                                 |       |                 |       |
|                                                                                              |       |                 |       |
| Kevin J. Murphy Jr.                                                                               |       | $                    | 170,000    |   |
| *Chief Technology Officer*                                                                        | * *   | * *             | * *   |
|                                                                                              |       |                 |       |
| Douglas G. Bryant                                                                                 |       | $                    | 210,000    |   |
| *Vice President of Finance and  Administration, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary* | * *   | * *             | * *   |
|                                                                                              |       |                 |       |
| Richard P. Graber                                                                                 |       | $                    | 200,000    |   |
| *Vice President of Engineering  and Operations*                                                   | * *   | * *             | * *   |
|                                                                                              |       |                 |       |
| Hugh W. Kelly                                                                                     |       | $                    | 180,000    |   |
| *Vice President of Worldwide  Marketing*                                                          | * *   | * *             | * *   |

 

1

----
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3670 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3670

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To require the Transportation Security Administration to comply with 
     the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY OF THE UNIFORMED SERVICES EMPLOYMENT AND 
              REEMPLOYMENT RIGHTS ACT TO THE TRANSPORTATION SECURITY 
              ADMINISTRATION.

    (a) In General.--Section 111(d) of the Aviation and Transportation 
Security Act (49 U.S.C. 44935 note; Public Law 107-71) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Notwithstanding'' and inserting the 
        following:
            ``(1) General authority.--Except as provided in paragraph 
        (2), and notwithstanding''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Uniformed services employment and reemployment rights 
        act.--In carrying out the functions authorized under paragraph 
        (1), the Under Secretary shall be subject to the provisions set 
        forth in chapter 43 of title 38, United States Code.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date that is 270 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 30, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3670

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To require the Transportation Security Administration to comply with 
     the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act.
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

N o. 04

- 19

- 00081

- CV

Joe REYES

,

Appellant

v.

Christina GALINDO

, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CV01140

Honorable J. Frank Davis, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE CHAPA

, JUSTICE RIOS , AND JUSTICE WATKINS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. We

ORDER that appellee recover from appell ant the costs she incurred related to this appeal.

SIGNED June 5, 2019.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa , Justice
### SUBCHAPTER II—FEDERAL ASSISTANCE TO STATE DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES COUNCILS
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3473 

To provide employment opportunities for veterans in transportation 

construction projects, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2011 

Mr. RAHALL (for himself and Mr. PETRI) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To provide employment opportunities for veterans in 

transportation construction projects, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mobilizing Opportuni5 ties for Veterans Employment Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. VETERANS PREFERENCE IN HIGHWAY CONSTRUC7 TION. 

8 Section 114 of title 23, United States Code, is 

9 amended by adding at the end the following: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3473 IH

1 ‘‘(d) VETERANS EMPLOYMENT.—Recipients of Fed2 eral financial assistance under this chapter shall ensure 

3 that contractors working on a project funded using such 

4 assistance give a hiring preference to veterans, as defined 

5 in section 2108 of title 5, who have the requisite skills 

6 and abilities to perform the construction work required 

7 under the contract. This subsection shall not apply to 

8 projects subject to section 140(d) of this title.’’. 

9 SEC. 3. VETERANS PREFERENCE IN TRANSIT CONSTRUC10 TION. 

11 Section 5325 of title 49, United States Code, is 

12 amended by adding at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘(k) VETERANS EMPLOYMENT.—Recipients and sub14 recipients of Federal financial assistance under this chap15 ter shall ensure that contractors working on a capital 

16 project funded using such assistance give a hiring pref17 erence to veterans, as defined in section 2108 of title 5, 

18 who have the requisite skills and abilities to perform the 

19 construction work required under the contract.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Lauren T. Johnson, Respondent, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc., Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from an order granting respondent’s motion for a preference in an action to recover damages for personal injuries. In opposition to the motion defendant made an offer to pay the respondent the sum of $10,000 “as an advance payment in partial satisfaction of any final judgment which may be rendered in favor of the plaintiff in this action ” or on account of any settlement which might be made, without any obligation on the part of the respondent to repay this sum. The offer was made on certain terms and conditions which, generally stated, are that the motion be denied with leave to renew after November 1, 1953, or that the case be added to the ready day calendar not earlier than January 2, 1954. The purpose of the offer, as asserted on behalf of defendant, was “ to further justice and at the same time relieve plaintiff’s acute economic problems.” Order reversed, without costs, and motion denied, without costs, on condition that the defendant will not, within ten days after the making of the order hereon, withdraw its said offer, and on the further condition that defendant carry out the terms of the offer, if it be accepted. Otherwise, the order is reversed, without costs, and motion denied, without costs, with leave to renew after September 30, 1953, or earlier upon a satisfactory showing that a prognosis of the injuries to respondent’s left lower extremity can be made with reasonable certainty. The moving papers establish that the respondent has sustained a number of serious injuries, the true nature, and the permanence of which, cannot be presently established. The sum offered by the defendant is sufficient to relieve respondent of his present financial stringency. Adel, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Heating, Piping and Air Conditioning Contractors New York City Association, Inc., Respondent, and Joseph Monahan, as President of Enterprise Association Local Union No. 638 of the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
#### CITY OF MITCHELL et al. v. DAKOTA CENTRAL TELEPHONE CO.

(Opinion filed, October 3, 1911.)

On petition for rehearing.

Denied.

For former opinion, see 27 S. D. 509, 131 N. W. 1090.

WHITING, J.

This cause is before the court upon a petition for rehearing. The opinion, concerning which a rehearing is sought, is reported in 27 S. D. 509, 131 N. W. 1090. In such opinion it was said: “If appellant desired, upon retrial in the lower court, to change the- issues, it should have asked this court to return the cause without a direction that judgment be entered in favor of plaintiff. No such modification was asked for, and no rehearing sought.”

Appellant, upon this petition for rehearing, calls attention to an inaccuracy in the above statement, and under the record upon the former appeal it is clear that in our opinion upon this appeal we should have stated: “If appellant desired, upon retrial in the lower court, to change the issues and raise the question thereafter sought to be raised by the amendment allowed by the trial court, it should have requested this court to return the cause without a *169direction that judgment be entered, in order that it might ask for the above amendment. No modification of such judgment for such purpose was asked, and no rehearing was sought on that ground.” The record upon the former appeal shows that a petition seeking a modification of our decision was filed; but it was based upon grounds other than a desire to amend the pleadings, and was, in our opinion, without merit.

It is therefore clear that, while the statement above quoted was inaccurate, yet the variance was immaterial, and furnishes no grounds whatever for the granting of a rehearing upon this appeal; and such rehearing is refused.
### **CHAPTER 98—OCEAN THERMAL ENERGY CONVERSION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT**

Sec.
9001.
Congressional findings and declaration of purpose.
9002.
Comprehensive program management plan.
9003.
Research and development.
9004.
Pilot and demonstration plants.
9005.
Technology application.
9006.
Program selection criteria.
9007.
Technical Panel of Energy Research Advisory Board.
9008.
Definitions.
9009.
Authorization of appropriations.
### §13703. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 13703 was editorially reclassified as section 12103 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
Editorial Note on Part 922
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

§ 922.180 Purpose. ( a ) The purpose of the regulations in this subpart is to implement the designation of the Hawaiian Islands Humpback Whale National Marine Sanctuary by regulating activities affecting the resources of the Sanctuary or any of the qualities, values, or purposes for which the Sanctuary was designated, in order to protect, preserve, and manage the conservation, ecological, recreational, research, educational, historical, cultural, and aesthetic resources and qualities of the area. The regulations are intended to supplement and complement existing regulatory authorities; to facilitate to the extent compatible with the primary objective of protecting the humpback whale and its habitat, all public and private uses of the Sanctuary, including uses of Hawaiian natives customarily and traditionally exercised for subsistence, cultural, and religious purposes, as well as education, research, recreation, commercial and military activities; to reduce conflicts between compatible uses; to maintain, restore, and enhance the humpback whale and its habitat; to contribute to the maintenance of natural assemblages of humpback whales for future generations; to provide a place for humpback whales that are dependent on their Hawaiian Islands wintering habitat for reproductive activities, including breeding, calving, and nursing, and for the long-term survival of their species; and to achieve the other purposes and policies of the HINMSA and NMSA.
( b ) These regulations may be modified to fulfill the Secretary's responsibilities for the Sanctuary, including the provision of additional protections for humpback whales and their habitat, if reasonably necessary, and the conservation and management of other marine resources, qualities and ecosystems of the Sanctuary determined to be of national significance. The Secretary shall consult with the Governor of the State of Hawaii on any modification to the regulations contained in this part. For any modification of the regulations contained in this part that would constitute a change in a term of the designation, as contained in the Designation Document for the Sanctuary, the Secretary shall follow the applicable requirements of sections 303 and 304 of the NMSA, and sections 2305 and 2306 of the HINMSA.
( c ) Section 304(e) of the NMSA requires the Secretary to review management plans and regulations every five years, and make necessary revisions. Upon completion of the five year review of the Sanctuary management plan and regulations, the Secretary will repropose the Sanctuary management plan and regulations in their entirety with any proposed changes thereto. The Governor of the State of Hawaii will have the opportunity to review the re-proposed management plan and regulations before they take effect and if the Governor certifies any term or terms of such management plan or regulations as unacceptable, the unacceptable term or terms will not take effect in State waters of the Sanctuary.
[Civil No. 232.]

#### H. D. UNDERWOOD, Appellant, v. THOMAS HUGHES, Auditor, Appellee.

APPEAL from the District Court of the Third Judicial District in and for the County of Yavapai. James H. Wright, Judge.

E. M. Sanford, for Appellant.

William Herring, Attorney-General, for Appellee,

September 29, 1892.

Dismissed.
§ 743.4 Conventional arms reporting. ( a ) *Scope.* This section outlines special reporting requirements for exports of certain items included in the UN Register of Conventional Arms (UNRoCA) and Wassenaar Arrangement (WA) Munitions List. These reports cover substantially similar arms. States participating in the UNRoCA report annually on all transfers of arms (see *www.disarmament.unoda.org/convarms/register/*); Participating States of the Wassenaar Arrangement exchange information every six months on deliveries and transfers to non-WA governments of conventional arms set forth in the *Wassenaar Arrangement's Basic Documents* under Part II “Guideline and Procedures, including the Initial Elements”, Appendix 3: “Specific Information Exchange on Arms Content by Category”. Public Documents, Vol. 1—Founding Documents at *https://www.wassenaar.org/app/uploads/2021/12/Public-Docs-Vol-I-Founding-Documents.pdf*). BIS obtains the information needed for such conventional arms reporting from the information exporters are required to submit in the EEI submission in AES, pursuant to § 758.1(b)(9) and (g)(4)(ii) of the EAR. No additional reporting to BIS is required for purposes of this section. BIS does not submit reports for reexports or transfers (in-country) under this section. BIS does not include exports to Wassenaar member countries, identified in supplement no. 1 to part 743 in the Wassenaar reports. required under this section.
( b ) *Information included in the reports* — ( 1 ) *Authorizations reported.* Exports authorized under BIS licenses, License Exceptions TMP, RPL, STA, or GOV (see part 740 of the EAR) and under the Validated End User authorization (see § 748.15 of the EAR).
( 2 ) *ECCNs reported.* ECCNs 0A501.a and .b, 0A506.a. and .b, and 0A507.a and .b.
( 3 ) *Quantity and recipient state reported.* The quantity and the name of the recipient state.
( c ) *Contacts.* Information concerning the reporting requirements for items identified in paragraph (b)(2) of this section is available from the Office of Nonproliferation and Foreign Policy Controls (NFPC), Tel.: (202) 482-4188, Fax: (202) 482-4145.
[89 FR 34706, Apr. 30, 2024]
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 357 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 357

             For the relief of Corina de Chalup Turcinovic.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 19, 2011

 Mr. Lipinski introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             For the relief of Corina de Chalup Turcinovic.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR CORINA DE CHALUP TURCINOVIC.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Corina de Chalup Turcinovic 
shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment 
of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 
upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 
section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Corina de Chalup Turcinovic enters 
the United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection 
(c), she shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and 
shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status 
under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Corina de Chalup Turcinovic, 
the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 
1, during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number 
of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's birth 
under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Corina de 
Chalup Turcinovic shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be 
accorded any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and 
Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
April 7, 2015 

MEMORANDUM TO: Mark A. Satorius 

 Executive Director for Operations 

 

FROM: Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS – SECY-15-0029 – REPORT TO 

CONGRESS ON ABNORMAL OCCURRENCES: 

FISCAL YEAR 2014 

The Commission has approved the proposed FY 2014 Report to Congress on Abnormal 

Occurrences (AOs), subject to the attached comments and changes. 

Prior to the next report to Congress, the staff should identify an estimate of the number of 

byproduct medical procedures, both tests and treatments, performed in the United States to put 

into context the number of AOs reported in future reports to Congress on AOs.

The staff should continue to work with the Agreement States to improve the timeliness, 

consistency, and completeness of the information that is reported. 

Attachment: Changes to the FY 2014 Report to Congress on Abnormal Occurrences 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA 

 OPA 

 Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR 

 

SECY NOTE

This SRM will be released to the 

public five working days after 

dispatch of the report to Congress. 
Attachment 

Changes to the FY 2014 Report to Congress on Abnormal Occurrences 

1. Page iii, 3rd ¶, last sentence, revise to read: “...in comparison to the high number millions of 

medical procedures...” 

2. Page viii, 2nd full ¶, add a comma after the Federal Register citations in lines 2 and 4. 

3. Page 1, indent the 2nd line of the heading for AS14-01. 

4. Page 1, AS14-01, 3rd ¶, line 4, revise to read: “...requested a re-test, which...” 

5. Page 1, AS14-01, 4th ¶, line 4, revise to read: “...occured occurred;...” 

6. Page 5, indent the 2nd line of the heading for NRC14-01. 

7. Page B-2, “Background” section, line 6, revise to read: “...with regards to...” 

8. Page B-2, “Update...” section, line 2, revise to read: “...Accession No. ML102020551), 

which...”
EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Medina  International  Corp.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Nick
DeMare, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Nick DeMare
-----------------------
Nick DeMare
Chief Financial Officer




<PAGE>