alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kevin Mims, Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 565]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rena K. Uviller, J., at hearing; Gregory Carro, J., at plea and sentence), rendered May 3, 2005, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations, which are supported by the record *(see People v Prochilo,*41 NY2d 759, 761 [1977]). After observing a traffic infraction, the police made a lawful stop of the livery cab in which defendant was riding *(see People v Robinson,*97 NY2d 341 [2001]; *People v Irizarry,*282 AD2d 483 [2001], *lv denied*97 NY2d 705 [2002]). After properly asking defendant to step out of the cab *(see People v Alvarez,*308 AD2d 184, 187 [2003], *lv denied*3 NY3d 657 [2004]), an officer noticed a large bulge in defendant’s crotch area. This observation, coupled with the officer’s observation of defendant’s furtive behavior when the cab was stopped, provided reasonable suspicion justifying a frisk *(see People v Williams,*287 AD2d 396 [2001], *lv denied*97 NY2d 734 [2002]; *People v Duncan,*234 AD2d 8 [1996]; *compare People v Taveras,*155 AD2d 131 [1990], *appeal dismissed*76 NY2d 871 [1990]). When the officer touched the bulge and felt a hard object that he reasonably believed could be a gun, he was entitled to reach into the crotch area and remove the object, which consisted of a package of drugs *(see People v Thompson,*232 AD2d 267 [1996], *lv denied*89 NY2d 947 [1997]). Concur— Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Nardelli and McGuire, JJ.
No: 15-027 April 24, 2015

CONTACT: Maureen Conley, 301-415-8200 

NRC to Discuss Zion License Termination Plan, 

Take Comments at Public Meeting

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is requesting comments on the license termination plan 

for the Zion nuclear power plant and will hold a public meeting on the plan April 28 in Zion, Ill.

The meeting will be from 6 – 9 p.m. at the Illinois Beach Resort & Conference Center, 

1 Lake Front Dr. The NRC will discuss the plan and take comments on it at the meeting. Written 

comments may also be submitted until May 26.

The plan provides site radiological information, the planned demolition and decommissioning 

tasks, and the planned final radiological surveys and data needed to allow termination of the plant’s 

NRC license.

ZionSolutions assumed Zion’s license from Exelon in 2010 for the purpose of 

decommissioning. Zion Unit 2 permanently shut down in 1996, followed by Unit 1 in 1997. All spent 

fuel at the site has been moved into dry storage. Decommissioning is scheduled to be complete in 2018, 

after which the license will be transferred back to Exelon.

ZionSolutions submitted the plan December 19, followed by a supplement February 26. The 

documents explain how ZionSolutions will meet NRC criteria for unrestricted release of the property.

More information about Zion is available on the NRC website.

Written comments may be submitted via: the federal rulemaking website by searching on 

Docket ID NRC-2015-0082; email to Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov; or mail to Cindy Bladey, Office of 

Administration, Mail Stop: O12-H08, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 

20555-0001.

Technical questions may be addressed to the project manager, John Hickman at 301-415-3017,

or via e-mail, John.Hickman@nrc.gov.
H. R. 366 

One Hundred Twelfth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and eleven 

An Act 

To provide for an additional temporary extension of programs under the Small 

Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION 

OF PROGRAMS UNDER THE SMALL BUSINESS ACT AND 

THE SMALL BUSINESS INVESTMENT ACT OF 1958. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to 

extend temporarily certain authorities of the Small Business 

Administration’’, approved October 10, 2006 (Public Law 109–316; 

120 Stat. 1742), as most recently amended by section 1 of Public 

Law 111–251 (124 Stat. 2631), is amended by striking ‘‘January 

31, 2011’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘May 31, 2011’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by subsection 

(a) shall take effect on January 30, 2011. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Medina  International  Corp.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bradley
Colby,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Bradley Colby
-----------------------
Bradley Colby
Chief Executive Officer




<PAGE>
#### John J. Shea, Appellee, v. Paul J. Morand, Appellant.

Gen. No. 19,379.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Chables H. Bowles, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1913.

Reversed with finding of facts.

Opinion filed December 31, 1914.

Statement of the Case.

Action by John J. Shea against Paul J. Morand for malicious prosecution. To reverse a judgment in favor of plaintiff for five hundred dollars, defendant appeals.

Defendant had procured the arrest of plaintiff on a charge of embezzlement, and on a hearing before a justice of the peace plaintiff was discharged.

The charge of embezzlement was based on the claim that plaintiff, while an agent of defendant, had collected money belonging to defendant and had appropriated it to his use. The undisputed facts were that before the complaint was made on which the warrant for the arrest of plaintiff was issued, defendant went to his *12regular' attorney, who for years had transacted for him such business as required the services of an attorney, and fairly and fully submitted to him all the facts within his knowledge concerning the charge that was eventually lodged against plaintiff. On the following day the attorney went to the office of defendant and examined the books of defendant pertaining to the matter and talked with the bookkeeper and the cashier and again talked with defendant, going over the facts with each separately. The attorney then advised that a demand be made on plaintiff for the money, which was done, with the result that plaintiff refused to turn it over. The attorney then advised defendant that plaintiff was guilty of the crime of embezzlement and advised him to *‘ ‘*swear out a warrant. ’ ’ Acting on this advice, the complaint on which the warrant in question was issued was made.

Abstract of the Decision.

1. Malicious prosecution, § *75*
      ***
      *—when evidence shows defendant did not act without probable cause.*In an action for malicious prosecution, the course pursued hy defendant in having plaintiff arrested for embezzlement, as shown hy the uncontradicted evidence, *held to*successfully rebut any presumption of malice, and to conclusively establish the fact that defendant did not act without probable cause.

2. Malicious prosecution, § *13*—when person acting on advice of counsel not liable.*Where a prosecuting witness presents all the facts within his knowledge, or that he could have ascertained by reasonable diligence, fairly and without reserve to a State’s Attorney or some other lawyer of re'cognized ability and good standing, and in good faith acts on his advice, he cannot he held responsible in an action for malicious prosecution.

Thomas E. Rooney and Ferdinand Goss, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and ' section number.

Mr. Justice Graves

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### § 995.5 Abbreviations.

CED Certified NOAA ENC Distributor

CEVAD Certified NOAA ENC Value Added Distributor

CRC Cyclical Redundancy Checksum

ECDIS Electronic Chart Display and Information System

ENC Electronic Navigational Chart

IEC International Electrotechnical Commission

IHO International Hydrographic Organization

IMO International Maritime Organization

ISO International Organization for Standardization

NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

NOS National Ocean Service

OCS Office of Coast Survey

SENC System Electronic Navigational Chart

SOLAS Safety of Life at Sea

VAD Value Added Distributor
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 29, 2013

No. 04-12-00727-CV

Enjoli WYNN,

Appellant

v.

SILVER OAKS APARTMENTS, LTD.,

Appellee

From the County Court At Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 380959

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s third motion for extension of time is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is 

due on April 29, 2013. No further extensions will be granted absent extenuating circumstances.

___________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of April, 2013.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.2


Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer


of CNA Financial Corporation


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350


(As adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of CNA Financial Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:


• the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


• the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:February 8, 2022By/s/ Larry HaefnerLarry HaefnerInterim Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
### subpart c—assuring a safer childhood vaccination program in united states
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-19-00390-CR

Robert Johnnie Garcia

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

105th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 17FC-3165D

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

December 30, 2020
#### § 3.53 Review of recommended decision in absence of exceptions.

If no party files exceptions to the recommended decision of the Administrative Law Judge under § 3.52(a)(1) or § 3.52(b)(1), the Commission will enter an order placing the case on its own docket for review. The Commission's order will set forth the scope of such review and the issues which will be considered and will make provision for the filing of briefs if deemed appropriate by the Commission.

[88 FR 42877, July 5, 2023]
### §13292. Proposals

#### (a) Solicitation

Not later than one year after October 24, 1992, the Secretary shall solicit proposals from non-Federal persons, including fleet operators, for projects under this part. Within 240 days after proposals have been solicited, the Secretary shall select proposals.

#### (b) Criteria

(1) The Secretary shall provide financial assistance to no more than 10 projects under this part, unless the Secretary determines that the total amount of available funds is not likely to be otherwise used.

(2) The proposals selected by the Secretary shall, to the extent practicable, represent geographically and climatically diverse regions of the United States.

(3) The aggregate Federal financial assistance for each project under this part may not exceed $4,000,000.

#### (c) Projects

The infrastructure and support systems programs for which projects are selected under this part may address—

(1) the ability to service electric motor vehicles and to provide or service associated equipment;

(2) the installation of charging facilities;

(3) rates and cost recovery for electric utilities who invest in infrastructure capital-related expenditures;

(4) the development of safety and health procedures and guidelines related to battery charging, watering, and emissions;

(5) the conduct of information dissemination programs; and

(6) such other subjects as the Secretary considers necessary in order to address the infrastructure and support systems needed to support the development and use of energy storage technologies, including advanced batteries, and the demonstration of electric motor vehicles.

(Pub. L. 102–486, title VI, §622, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2904.)
§ 300.12 Labeling of pairs or products containing two or more units. ( a ) Where a wool product consists of two or more parts, units, or items of different fiber content, a separate label containing the required information shall be affixed to each of such parts, units, or items showing the required information as to such part, unit, or item, provided that where such parts, units, or items, are marketed or handled as a single product or ensemble and are sold and delivered to the ultimate consumer as a single product or ensemble, the required information may be set out on a single label in such a manner as to separately show the fiber composition of each part, unit, or item.
( b ) Where garments, wearing apparel, or other wool products are marketed or handled in pairs or ensembles of the same fiber content, only one unit of the pair or ensemble need be labeled with the required information when sold and delivered to the ultimate consumer.
( c ) Where parts or units of wool products of the types referred to in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section are sold separately, such parts or units shall be labeled with the information required by the Act and regulations.
[29 FR 6624, May 21, 1964]
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3791 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to require annual disclosures 

relating to the compensation brackets in which an issuer’s minority 

and women employees reside. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 18, 2012 

Mr. MEEKS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to require 

annual disclosures relating to the compensation brackets 

in which an issuer’s minority and women employees reside. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 

4 Congress finds the following: 

5 (1) Breaking through the ‘‘glass ceiling’’ by mi6 norities and women is a bipartisan issue. 

7 (2) Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Rom8 ney advocated an idea for imposing pressure on pubVerDate Mar 15 2010 03:44 Jan 19, 2012 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3791.IH H3791

pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3791 IH

1 lic companies to benefit minorities and women dur2 ing a debate with then-Senator Edward M. Kennedy 

3 in 1994, stating: ‘‘I believe that public companies 

4 and Federal agencies should be required to report in 

5 their annual 10K the number of minorities and 

6 women by income group across the company, so we 

7 can identify where the glass ceiling is and break 

8 through it. And I think that the market of America 

9 will say ‘that company has not promoted women, has 

10 not promoted minorities’ and will put pressure on 

11 American corporations and agencies to respond.’’. 

12 SEC. 2. DISCLOSURES RELATING TO COMPENSATION OF 

13 MINORITIES AND WOMEN. 

14 Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

15 (15 U.S.C. 78m) is amended by adding at the end the 

16 following: 

17 ‘‘(r) DISCLOSURES RELATING TO COMPENSATION OF

18 MINORITIES AND WOMEN.— 

19 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 270 days 

20 after the date of the enactment of this subsection, 

21 the Commission shall issue final rules that require 

22 each issuer required to file an annual report under 

23 this section to— 

24 ‘‘(A) using compensation information for 

25 all employees, determine the 5 compensation 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3791 IH

1 brackets in which the issuer’s employees reside 

2 (where such brackets contain an equal number 

3 of employees and range from the 20 percent of 

4 employees with the lowest compensation to the 

5 20 percent of employees with the highest com6 pensation); and 

7 ‘‘(B) include in the issuer’s annual report 

8 the number of minorities and women employed 

9 by the issuer that fall into each of the com10 pensation brackets. 

11 ‘‘(2) SELF-REPORTING.—For purposes of iden12 tifying an employee as a minority or woman for pur13 poses of paragraph (1)(B), an issuer shall rely on 

14 self-reporting by such employee.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Willoughby B. Dobbs, an Attorney.

Referred to Hon. Henry A. Gildersleeve, official referee. Order to be settled on *950notice. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
§ 25.33 Witnesses. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, testimony at the hearing shall be given orally by witnesses under oath or affirmation.
( b ) At the discretion of the ALJ, testimony may be admitted in the form of a written statement or deposition. Any such written statements must be provided to all other parties along with the last known address of such witness, in a manner which allows sufficient time for other parties to subpoena such witness for cross-examination at the hearing. Prior written statements of witnesses proposed to testify at the hearing and deposition transcripts shall be exchanged as provided in § 25.22(a).
( c ) The ALJ shall exercise reasonable control over the mode and order of interrogating witnesses and presenting evidence so as to— ( 1 ) Make the interrogation and presentation effective for the ascertainment of the truth;
( 2 ) Avoid needless consumption of time; and
( 3 ) Protect witnesses from harassment or undue embarrassment.
( d ) The ALJ shall permit the parties to conduct such cross-examination as may be required for a full and true disclosure of the facts.
( e ) At the discretion of the ALJ, a witness may be cross-examined on matters relevant to the proceeding without regard to the scope of his or her direct examination. To the extent permitted by the ALJ, cross-examination on matters outside the scope of direct examination shall be conducted in the manner of direct examination and may proceed by leading questions only if the witness is a hostile witness, an adverse party or a witness identified with an adverse party.
( f ) Upon motion of any party, the ALJ shall order witnesses excluded so that they cannot hear the testimony of other witnesses. This rule does not authorize exclusion of— ( 1 ) A party who is an individual;
( 2 ) In the case of a party that is not an individual, an officer or employee of the party designated by the party's representative; or
( 3 ) An individual whose presence is shown by a party to be essential to the presentation of its case, including an individual employed by the Government engaged in assisting the representative for the Government.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3719 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3719

  To provide that funds made available to the Corps of Engineers for 
   certain Missouri River fish and wildlife purposes be used for the 
  reconstruction of flood control structures, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 16, 2011

  Mr. King of Iowa (for himself, Mr. Braley of Iowa, Mr. Boswell, Mr. 
Loebsack, Mr. Graves of Missouri, Mrs. Hartzler, Mr. Latham, Mr. Terry, 
 and Ms. Jenkins) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to 
  the Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide that funds made available to the Corps of Engineers for 
   certain Missouri River fish and wildlife purposes be used for the 
  reconstruction of flood control structures, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. USE OF FUNDS FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF FLOOD CONTROL STRUCTURES.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, all unobligated 
balances of funds made available in appropriations Acts, and all funds 
subsequently appropriated, for the Missouri River Fish and Wildlife 
Recovery, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, and 
South Dakota, and Tributaries, and the carrying out of the Army Corps 
of Engineers' responsibilities in the management of the Missouri River 
under the fish and wildlife authorized purpose, shall be available only 
for the reconstruction of flood control structures until the structures 
are returned to the elevation and design that predates the 2011 
Missouri River flood event and the reconstruction efforts are 
completed.
                                 <all>
```
### subpart 3—department of energy modernization
§ 1230.2 Requirements for frame child carriers. Each frame child carrier must comply with all applicable provisions of ASTM F2549-22, *Standard Consumer Safety Specification for Frame Child Carriers,* approved on approved April 1, 2022. The Director of the Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. A read-only copy of the standard is available for viewing on the ASTM website at *www.astm.org/READINGLIBRARY/ .* You may obtain a copy from ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959; telephone (610) 832-9585; *www.astm.org .* You may inspect a copy at the Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Room 820, 4330 East-West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, telephone (301) 504-7479, email *cpsc-os@cpsc.gov ,* or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, email *fr.inspection@nara.gov ,* or go to: *www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html .* [87 FR 53662, Sept. 1, 2022]