alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17D0491. LAMAR JOHNSON v. THE STATE.

Lamar Johnson was convicted of armed robbery, hijacking a motor vehicle,

kidnapping, false imprisonment, and possession of a firearm during the commission

of a crime. On appeal, this Court reversed Johnson’s conviction for possession of a

firearm during the commission of a crime, but affirmed the remainder of his

convictions. See Johnson v. State, 309 Ga. App. 655 (710 SE2d 857) (2011). In

2016, he filed a motion to vacate and modify sentence, and a motion to vacate void

sentence. The trial court denied the motions on January 24, 2017. Johnson then filed,

in the trial court, a motion for an extension of time to appeal. On May 2, 2017, the

trial court granted the motion, pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-39, and gave Johnson until

June 1, 2017, to file a “notice of appeal[].”1

Johnson filed this application for

discretionary review on June 1, 2017, 128 days after entry of the order denying his

motions seeking relief from his sentence.

An application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days of the

entry of the order or judgment to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The

requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an

application for appeal not made in compliance therewith. See Boyle v. State, 190 Ga.

1 A direct appeal may lie from an order denying or dismissing a motion to vacate a

void sentence, but only if the defendant raises a colorable claimthat the sentence is, in fact,

void. See Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 217 n.1 (686 SE2d 786) (2009); Burg v. State, 297

Ga. App. 118, 119 (676 SE2d 465) (2009). A sentence is void only if it imposes

punishment that the law does not allow. Crumbley v. State, 261 Ga. 610, 611 (1) (409

SE2d 517) (1991).

June 20, 2017
App. 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989). Although the trial court purported to grant Johnson

an extension of time to file an application, it lacked authority to do so. See Gable v.

State, 290 Ga. 81, 85 (2) (a) (720 SE2d 170) (2011) (“Because a discretionary

application must be filed only in an appellate court, see OCGA § 5-6-35 (d), a trial

court may not grant an extension of the time to file the application pursuant to OCGA

§ 5-6-39.”). Instead, an applicant must request an extension from this Court, within

the original 30-day filing period. Id.; see also Court of Appeals Rule 31 (i).

Because Johnson did not make a timely request for an extension before this

Court, we have no basis for excusing his failure to comply with the 30-day deadline

set forth in OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). Accordingly, this application is hereby DISMISSED

for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

06/20/2017
§ 12.19 Counterclaim. A registrant may, at the time of filing an answer to a complaint, set forth as a counterclaim: (a) Facts alleging a violation and a request for a reparation award that would be a proper subject for a complaint under § 12.13 of these rules; or ( b ) Any claim which at the time the complaint is served the registrant has against the complainant if it arises out of the transaction or occurrence or series of transactions or occurrences set forth in the complaint.
̄

012

Miles

This product was produced from geospatial information prepared by

the USDA Forest Service. Source map scales vary and accuracy of

this product has not been assessed. Using GIS product for purposes

other than those for which they were created my yield inaccurate or

misleading results.

Disclaimer

Land Cover Type

NATIONAL RECREATION AREA

Between Lakes The NORTH

Legend

Cover Type

Other Features

Road Level

Major Rivers & Lakes

Oak Forest on Xeric 

and Dry Sites

Oak Forest on Dry-Mesic, 

Mesic and Alluvial Sites

Planted Pine

Shortleaf Pine Forest

Mesophytic Forest

Riparian Forest

Cropland

Hayfields

Maintained Openland

Old Field

Wildlife Plantings

Administrative

Road ROW

Lakes

Ponds

Utility Corridor

1

2

3

4

5

Prepared by US Forest Service, Land Between The Lakes

GIS Laboratory, September 2004
§ 2.2 Complaint or request for Commission action. ( a ) A complaint or request for Commission action may be submitted via the Commission's web-based complaint site (*https://www.ftccomplaintassistant.gov/*); by a telephone call to 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357); or by a signed statement setting forth the alleged violation of law with such supporting information as is available, and the name and address of the person or persons complained of, filed with the Office of the Secretary in conformity with § 4.2(d) of this chapter. No forms or formal procedures are required.
( b ) The person making the complaint or request is not regarded as a party to any proceeding that might result from the investigation.
( c ) Where the complainant's identity is not otherwise made public, the Commission's policy is not to publish or divulge the name of a complainant except as authorized by law or by the Commission's rules. Complaints or requests submitted to the Commission may, however, be lodged in a database and made available to federal, state, local, and foreign law enforcement agencies that commit to maintain the privacy and security of the information provided. Further, where a complaint is by a consumer or consumer representative concerning a specific consumer product or service, the Commission in the course of a referral of the complaint or request, or in furtherance of an investigation, may disclose the identity of the complainant. In referring any such consumer complaint, the Commission specifically retains its right to take such action as it deems appropriate in the public interest and under any of the statutes it administers.
[77 FR 59305, Sept. 27, 2012]
§ 1235.2 Requirements for baby changing products. Each baby changing product shall comply with all applicable provisions of ASTM F2388-21, *Standard Consumer Safety Specification for Baby Changing Products for Domestic Use,* approved on November 15, 2021. The Director of the Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. A read-only copy of the standard is available for viewing on the ASTM website at *https://www.astm.org/READINGLIBRARY/ .* You may obtain a copy from ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959; telephone (610) 832-9585; *www.astm.org .* You may inspect a copy at the Division of the Secretariat, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Room 820, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, telephone (301) 504-7479, email *cpsc-os@cpsc.gov ,* or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, email *fr.inspection@nara.gov ,* or go to: *www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html .* [87 FR 24417, Apr. 26, 2022]
STEAM ELECTRIC

C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 09

- 0819

DCN:

________________________________________

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT

C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N

(C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2

, SU B P ART B

. SE 04360A203
#### State of Texas v. International & Great Northern Railroad Company.

Decided April 23, 1902.

Railway Company—Brakeman—Statute.

Article 4517, Revised Statutes, requiring railway companies to have a sufficient brake and keep a faithful brakeman upon the hindmost car of all trains transporting passengers and merchandise, applies only to trains which carry both, and not to those which are merely passenger trains.

Appeal from Travis. Tried below “before Hon. F. G. Morris.

*C. K. Bell,*Attorney-General, and *T. S. Reese,*Assistant Attorney-General, for appellant.

*N. A. Stedman,*for appellee.

FISHER, Chief Justice.

This is an action by the State against the railroad company to recover penalties arising from an alleged violation of article 4517 of the Revised Statutes, which reads as follows: “Every such company shall have a good and sufficient brake upon the hindmost car of all trains transporting passengers and merchandise, and also permanently stationed there a trusty and faithful brakeman, under a penalty of not exceeding $100 for each offense, to be recovered by suit in the "name of the State.”

The complaint made in the petition is to the effect that this law was not complied with by the appellee in the operation of its passenger trains only. The facts alleged in the petition were substantially proven. The *150trial court, as shown in its conclusions of law, held that the statute in question applied to trains carrying passengers and merchandise, and did not' apply to trains which exclusively carried passengers, or in other words, passenger trains.

We are of the opinion that this is a correct construction of the statute. It is needless to state our views upon this question, as they are in keeping with what is said in Railway v. Shelton, 58 S. W. Rep., 179; Railway v. Campbell, 45 S. W. Rep., *2;*and Railway v. Schloss, *23*S. W. Rep., 1014.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*

Writ of error refused.
Exhibit
13.1



Certification of Principal
Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Lina Saheb, the Interim Chief Executive Officer of Brooge Energy
Limited (the “Company”), hereby certify, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the years
ended December 31, 2018, December 31, 2019, December 31, 2020, December 31, 2021, December 31, 2022 and unaudited Interim Condensed Financial
Statements for June 30, 2022 (the “Reports”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in
the Reports fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date:          | April 26, 2023                  | 
|-------------- | ------------------------------- | 
|               |                                 | 
|/s/ Lina Saheb |                                
|Name:          | Lina Saheb                      | 
|Title:         | Interim Chief Executive Officer |
§ 1640.3 Definitions. ( a ) *Bedding product* means ( 1 ) An item that is used for sleeping or sleep-related purposes; or
( 2 ) Any component or accessory with respect to an item described in this paragraph (a), without regard to whether the component or accessory, as applicable, is used— ( i ) Alone; or
( ii ) Along with, or contained within, that item;
( b ) *California standard* means the standard set forth by the Bureau of Electronic and Appliance Repair, Home Furnishings and Thermal Insulation of the Department of Consumer Affairs of the State of California in Technical Bulletin 117- 2013, entitled “Requirements, Test Procedure and Apparatus for Testing the Smolder Resistance of Materials Used in Upholstered Furniture”, published June 2013 (see § 1640.6).
( c ) *Foundation* has the meaning given that term in § 1633.2 of this chapter.
( d ) *Mattress* has the meaning given that term in § 1633.2 of this chapter.
( e ) *Upholstered furniture.* ( 1 ) Means an article of seating furniture that— ( i ) Is intended for indoor use;
( ii ) Is movable or stationary;
( iii ) Is constructed with an upholstered seat, back, or arm;
( iv ) Is: ( A ) Made or sold with a cushion or pillow, without regard to whether that cushion or pillow, as applicable, is attached or detached with respect to the article of furniture, or
( B ) Stuffed or filled, or able to be stuffed or filled, in whole or in part, with any material, including a substance or material that is hidden or concealed by fabric or another covering, including a cushion or pillow belonging to, or forming a part of, the article of furniture; and
( v ) Together with the structural units of the article of furniture, any filling material, and the container and covering with respect to those structural units and that filling material, can be used as a support for the body of an individual, or the limbs and feet of an individual, when the individual sits in an upright or reclining position;
( 2 ) Includes an article of furniture that is intended for use by a child; and
( 3 ) Does not include— ( i ) A mattress;
( ii ) A foundation;
( iii ) Any bedding product; or
( iv ) Furniture that is used exclusively for the purpose of physical fitness and exercise.
#### § 432.5 Prohibited disclosures.

No performance characteristics to which this part applies shall be represented or disclosed if they are not obtainable as represented or disclosed when the equipment is operated by the consumer in the usual and normal manner without the use of extraneous aids.
No: 15-061 October 1, 2015

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200

NRC Completes Safety Review of Proposed New Reactors

at South Texas Project Site

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has completed its Final Safety Evaluation Report for 

the Combined Licenses (COL) for the proposed South Texas Project (STP) Units 3 and 4. The report

concludes there are no safety aspects that would preclude issuing licenses for construction and 

operation of the proposed reactors at the site, near Bay City, Texas.

The staff will provide the report and Final Environmental Impact Statement on the application 

to the Commission for the mandatory hearing phase of the licensing process. In the mandatory hearing, 

expected to take place later this year, the Commission will determine whether the staff’s review 

supports the findings necessary to issue the licenses. Following the mandatory hearing, the Commission 

will vote on whether to authorize the staff to issue the licenses.

STP Nuclear Operating Company submitted its COL application for Units 3 and 4 on Sept. 20, 

2007, for permission to build and operate two Advanced Boiling Water Reactors (ABWR) at the site. 

Nuclear Innovation North America became the lead applicant on Jan. 24, 2011. The proposed reactors 

would be adjacent to STP’s existing Units 1 and 2. The NRC certified the 1,300-megawatt electric 

ABWR design in 1997. More information on the ABWR certification process is available on the NRC 

website. 

The NRC’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards independently reviewed those aspects 

of the STP application that concern safety. The committee provided the results of its review to the 

Commission on Feb. 19, 2015. The NRC and the Army Corps of Engineers, Galveston District, 

completed the environmental review and issued the final impact statement for the proposed STP 

reactors in February 2011.
#### § 700.2 Date of manufacture.

Section 112 of the Act, 15 U.S.C. 2312, provides that the Act shall apply only to those consumer products manufactured after July 4, 1975. When a consumer purchases repair of a consumer product the date of manufacture of any replacement parts used is the measuring date for determining coverage under the Act. The date of manufacture of the consumer product being repaired is in this instance not relevant. Where a consumer purchases or obtains on an exchange basis a rebuilt consumer product, the date that the rebuilding process is completed determines the Act's applicability.

[42 FR 36114, July 13, 1977; 42 FR 38341, July 28, 1977, as amended at 80 FR 42721, July 20, 2015]
§ 1500.130 Self-pressurized containers: labeling. ( a ) Self-pressurized containers that fail to bear a warning statement adequate for the protection of the public health and safety may be misbranded under the act, except as otherwise provided pursuant to section 3 of the act.
( b ) The following warning statement will be considered as meeting the requirements of section 2(p)(1) of the act (repeated in § 1500.3(b)(14)(i)) if the only hazard associated with an article is that the contents are under pressure: warning—contents under pressure Do not puncture or incinerate container. Do not expose to heat or store at temperatures above 120 °F. Keep out of the reach of children.
The word “CAUTION” may be substituted for the word “WARNING”. A practical equivalent may be substituted for the statement “Keep out of the reach of children.”
( c ) That portion of the warning statement set forth in paragraph (b) of this section in capital letters should be printed on the main (front) panel of the container in capital letters of the type size specified in § 1500.121(c). The balance of the cautionary statements may appear together on another panel if the front panel also bears a statement such as “Read carefully other cautions on _____ panel.”
( d ) If an article has additional hazards, such as skin or eye irritancy, toxicity, or flammability, appropriate additional front and rear panel precautionary labeling is required.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of ARC Corporate Realty Trust, Inc.® (ACRT) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Bruce Nelson, Chief Financial Officer of ACRT,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of ACRT.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Bruce Nelson       
|Bruce Nelson           
|Chief Financial Officer
|August 6, 2004
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1286

JOHN T. KELLY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

REPUBLIC TOBACCO COMPANY; BROWN & WILLIAMSON

TOBACCO CORPORATION, Maker of Bugler Tobacco,

Louisville, KY 40232,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District

Judge. (CA-97-669-R)

Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 5, 1998

Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John T. Kelly, Appellant Pro Se. Sara Bugbee Winn, WOODS, ROGERS

& HAZLEGROVE, Roanoke, Virginia; Margaret Katherine Garber, BRUMBERG, MACKEY & WALL, P.L.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

John T. Kelly appeals the district court’s order dismissing

his civil action alleging negligence and breach of implied warranty

of merchantability for failure to state a claim upon which relief

may be granted. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Kelly v. Republic Tobacco Co., No. CA-97-669-R (W.D. Va.

Jan. 23, 1998). Kelly’s motion to supplement the record is denied.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### SUBCHAPTER III—SERVICE COORDINATORS FOR ELDERLY AND DISABLED RESIDENTS OF FEDERALLY ASSISTED HOUSING
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3417 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3417

 To amend the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century to modify 
 requirements relating to an addition to Corridor O in Pennsylvania on 
              the Appalachian development highway system.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 14, 2011

  Mr. Marino introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century to modify 
 requirements relating to an addition to Corridor O in Pennsylvania on 
              the Appalachian development highway system.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPALACHIAN DEVELOPMENT HIGHWAY SYSTEM.

    The last sentence of section 1117(d) of the Transportation Equity 
Act for the 21st Century (112 Stat. 161) is amended by striking 
``designated addition shall not affect estimates of the cost to 
complete such system and such''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 372 

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to authorize the Secretary 

of the Interior to deny leases and permits to persons who engage in 

activities with the government of any foreign country that is subject 

to any sanction or an embargo established by the Government of the 

United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 20, 2011 

Mr. BUCHANAN (for himself, Mr. MILLER of Florida, and Mr. STEARNS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to deny leases and 

permits to persons who engage in activities with the 

government of any foreign country that is subject to 

any sanction or an embargo established by the Government of the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 372 IH

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO DENY OIL AND GAS LEASES 

2 AND PERMITS TO PERSONS WHO ENGAGE IN 

3 ACTIVITIES WITH CERTAIN FOREIGN COUN4 TRIES. 

5 Section 8(a) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands 

6 Act (43 U.S.C. 1337(a)) is amended by adding at the end 

7 the following: 

8 ‘‘(9) The Secretary may deny issuance of an oil and 

9 gas lease under this Act, or a permit for exploration, devel10 opment, or production under such a lease, to any person 

11 that has engaged in activities with the government of any 

12 foreign country that is subject to any sanction or an em13 bargo established by the Government of the United States, 

14 including any sanction or embargo established under sec15 tion 203 of the Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 

16 U.S.C. 1702).’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS