alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Spectrum Sciences & Software Holdings
Corp.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 4.
    
    The issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the issuer and have:
 (c)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(d)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(e)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the issuers internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the issuers fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuers internal control over financial
reporting.
 5.
    
    The issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the
audit committee of issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (f)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(g)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the issuers internal control over financial reporting.
 
  38
EXHIBIT 10.10


 


November 6, 2003


 


Mr. Stephen W. Bershad


66 Arroyo Hondo Trail


Santa Fe, NM  87508


 


Dear Mr. Bershad:


 


Reference is
made to the Employment Agreement, dated October 12, 2000 (the “Employment
Agreement”), between Axsys Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) and you.


 


The Company
desires to extend the Initial Period (as defined in Section 2(a) of the
Employment Agreement) until October 12, 2004, subject to the earlier
termination of the Initial Period by you in your sole discretion or by the
Company, acting through its Board of Directors, in its sole discretion, by 30
days’ prior written notice to the other.


 


If the
foregoing extension of the Initial Period meets with your approval, please
indicate your acceptance in the space provided below.


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  AXSYS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Anthony
  J. Fiorelli, Jr.

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Chairman of
  the Compensation

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Committee of
  the Board of Directors

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Accepted and
  Agreed:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
    /s/  Stephen W. Bershad

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Stephen W.
  Bershad
No: 14-079 November 14, 2014

CONTACT: Maureen Conley, 301-415-8200 

NRC Extends Construction Deadline for MOX Fuel Fabrication Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission signed an order Nov. 13 extending the completion 

deadline for a mixed-oxide fuel fabrication facility in South Carolina. Shaw AREVA MOX Services 

will have an additional 10 years, or until March 30, 2025, to finish building the facility at the 

Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site in Aiken.

MOX Services asked for the extension in May after a number of factors delayed construction, 

including lower than requested annual funding from Congress and delays in the delivery of components 

and key construction activities. The NRC issued the original 10-year construction authorization March 

30, 2005. The extension does not expand the scope of work.

The NRC published an environmental assessment Oct. 23 that found no significant 

environmental impact would result from extending the authorization. NRC staff also found that MOX 

Services has shown good cause to extend the deadline for completion.

The order also reflects some administrative changes to the construction authorization, including 

a change in the licensee’s name to CB&I AREVA MOX Services to reflect Chicago Bridge & Iron’s 

acquisition of The Shaw Group in 2013. That change does not reflect any change in control of the 

company, management, operation or security. The order also removes a list of submittals that had been 

incorporated as references in the construction authorization, but have now been incorporated into the 

application.

 The MOX fabrication facility is a major component of the United States’ program to dispose 

of surplus plutonium taken from nuclear weapons by mixing it with uranium and burning it as fuel in 

commercial nuclear reactors.
#### § 12.200 Scope and applicability of this subpart.

The rules set forth in this subpart are applicable only to proceedings forwarded pursuant to § 12.26(b). The rules in subpart B of this part permitting discovery are applicable in a summary decisional proceeding. Unless specifically made applicable, the rules prescribed in subparts C and E of this part shall not apply to such proceedings. Parties to a proceeding forwarded pursuant to § 12.26(b) may, by signed agreement filed at any time prior to the issuance of the initial decision, or of any other order disposing of all issues in the proceeding, elect to have all of the issues in the proceeding decided pursuant to the voluntary decisional procedure. Upon receiving a timely filed stipulation signed by all parties evidencing such an election, the Administrative Judge shall conduct the proceeding and render a decision pursuant to subpart C of this part.

[86 FR 64356, Nov. 18, 2021]
§ 1500.268 Hearing. ( a ) If it appears that the hazardous substance may be subject to refusal of admission, the area office director shall give the owner or consignee a written notice to that effect, stating the reasons therefor. The notice shall specify a place and a period of time during which the owner or consignee shall have an opportunity to introduce testimony. Upon timely request, giving reasonable grounds therefor, such time and place may be changed. Such testimony shall be confined to matters relevant to the admissibility of the hazardous substance, and may be introduced orally or in writing.
( b ) If such owner or consignee submits or indicates his intention to submit an application for authorization to relabel or perform other action to bring the hazardous substance into compliance with the act, such testimony shall include evidence in support of such application. If such application is not submitted at or prior to the hearing, the area office director shall specify a time limit, reasonable in the light of the circumstances, for filing such application.
#### In the Matter of Michael A.C., Jr, Respondent, v Kari Lynn C., Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 710]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (Bernadette T. Romano, J.), entered August 2, 2005 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, adjudged respondent in willful violation of a prior order of visitation.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding alleging that respondent had interfered with his visitation rights. Fol*1174lowing a hearing, Family Court determined that respondent had willfully violated a prior order of visitation and imposed a jail term of three days, although the court suspended that sentence. Contrary to respondent’s contention, the determination that respondent willfully violated the prior order has *“a*sound and substantial basis in the record” *(Matter of Stuttard v*Stuttard, 2 AD3d 1415, 1416 [2003]; *see Matter of Glenn v Glenn,*262 AD2d 885, 886 [1999], *lv dismissed in part and denied in part*94 NY2d 782 [1999]; *Matter of Wright v Wright,*205 AD2d 889, 891 [1994]). Indeed, respondent admitted to the allegation that, on February 18 and 25, 2005, she interfered with the exercise of petitioner’s right of visitation *(see Wright,*205 AD2d at 891). Respondent testified at the hearing on the amended petition that she had informed petitioner in telephone conversations on those dates that she would not open the door to him when he arrived to pick up the children for visitation until he had complied with an order of discovery issued in a pending support matter. Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Scudder, Kehoe, Smith and Green, JJ.
§ 23.28 Misuse of the words “flawless,” “perfect,” etc. ( a ) It is unfair or deceptive to use the word “flawless” as a quality description of any gemstone that discloses blemishes, inclusions, or clarity faults of any sort when examined under a corrected magnifier at 10-power, with adequate illumination, by a person skilled in gemstone grading.
( b ) It is unfair or deceptive to use the word “perfect” or any representation of similar meaning to describe any gemstone unless the gemstone meets the definition of “flawless” and is not of inferior color or make.
( c ) It is unfair or deceptive to use the word “flawless,” “perfect,” or any representation of similar meaning to describe any imitation gemstone.
§ 317.2 Definitions. The following definitions shall apply throughout this Rule: ( a ) *Crude oil* means any mixture of hydrocarbons that exists: ( 1 ) In liquid phase in natural underground reservoirs and that remains liquid at atmospheric pressure after passing through separating facilities; or
( 2 ) As shale oil or tar sands requiring further processing for sale as a refinery feedstock.
( b ) *Gasoline* means: ( 1 ) Finished gasoline, including, but not limited to, conventional, reformulated, and oxygenated blends; and
( 2 ) Conventional and reformulated gasoline blendstock for oxygenate blending.
( c ) *Knowingly* means that the person knew or must have known that his or her conduct was fraudulent or deceptive.
( d ) *Person* means any individual, group, unincorporated association, limited or general partnership, corporation, or other business entity.
( e ) *Petroleum distillates* means: ( 1 ) Jet fuels, including, but not limited to, all commercial and military specification jet fuels; and
( 2 ) Diesel fuels and fuel oils, including, but not limited to, No. 1, No. 2, and No. 4 diesel fuel, and No. 1, No. 2, and No. 4 fuel oil.
( f ) *Wholesale* means: ( 1 ) All purchases or sales of crude oil or jet fuel; and
( 2 ) All purchases or sales of gasoline or petroleum distillates (other than jet fuel) at the terminal rack or upstream of the terminal rack level.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MediciNova, Inc. for the period ended September 30, 2006 (the Report), I, Yuichi Iwaki, Chief Executive Officer of MediciNova,
Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of MediciNova, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This certification has not been, and shall not be deemed,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



Date:

November 9, 2006By:

/S/    YUICHI
IWAKIYuichi Iwaki, M.D., Ph.D. President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [CO-200-0777-XZ-241A] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Front Range Resource Advisory Council (RAC), will meet as indicated below. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held January 5, 2005 from 9:15 a.m. to 4 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

Holy Cross Abbey Community Center, 2951 E. Highway 50, Canon City, Colorado 81212. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ken Smith, (719) 269-8500. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The 15 member Council advises the Secretary of the Interior, through the Bureau of Land Management, on a variety of planning and management issues associated with public land management in the Royal Gorge Field Office and San Luis Valley, Colorado. Planned agenda topics include: Manager updates on current land management issues; a presentation and discussion on Tamarisk control and local BLM weed control efforts and a briefing on power transmission and supply across public land. All meetings are open to the                           ( print page 69620)                        public. The public is encouraged to make oral comments to the Council at 9:30 a.m. or written statements may be submitted for the Councils consideration. Depending on the number of persons wishing to comment and time available, the time for individual oral comments may be limited. Summary minutes for the Council Meeting will be maintained in the Royal Gorge Field Office and will be available for public inspection and reproduction during regular business hours within thirty (30) days following the meeting. Meeting Minutes are also available at:                     *http://www.blm.gov/​rac/​co/​frrac/​co_​fr.htm.*

Dated: November 18, 2004. 

Linda McGlothlen, 

Acting Royal Gorge Field Manager. 

[FR Doc. 04-26420 Filed 11-29-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
NRC NEWS

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION IV

1450 Maria Lane, Walnut Creek, CA 94596

CONTACT: Mark Hammond (510) 975-0254/E-mail: mfh2@nrc.gov

 

 

 CONTACT: Mark Hammond FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

 Office: (510) 975-0254 March 28, 1996

 Home: (415) 674-1024 RIV-9623

 Pager: (800) 916-4952

 

 

 NRC STAFF TO HOLD OPEN PREDECISIONAL

 ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE APRIL 1 WITH COOPER NUCLEAR STATION

 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a

 predecisional enforcement conference with officials of the

 Cooper Nuclear Station, operated by the Nebraska Public Power

 District, on Monday, April 1, at 9 a.m. at NRC Region IV

 headquarters in Arlington, Texas. 

 

 The conference will be open to public observation, but

 participation will be limited to NRC and Cooper officials.

 The Cooper plant is near Brownsville, Neb.

 

 Scheduled to be discussed at the conference are apparent

 violations disclosed through NRC inspections conducted in

 February. Three apparent violations were identified and are

 being considered for escalated enforcement. In the first,

 inspectors identified that a blowout panel in the main steam

 tunnel was modified in 1985 such that the panels would not

 function to relieve pressure at design values. No required

 analysis was performed, and as a result the plant was not

 maintained in a configuration consistent with the Updated

 Final Safety Analysis Report and associated licensed design

 basis for about 10 years.

 

 The second and third violations involve design

 configuration control of the plant emergency diesel

 generators. In one case, an unauthorized modification to the

 solenoid valves, which control the muffler bypass valves,

 rendered one diesel generator inoperable under certain

 conditions for about 20 days. In the other, diesel control

 power circuitry was found to be inadequately isolated from

 the effects of a potential control room fire. This could

 have prevented the diesel generator from performing its

 intended function of providing emergency power necessary for

 the plant to achieve and maintain hot shutdown in the event

 of a control room fire.

 

 The decision to hold an enforcement conference does not

 mean the NRC has determined that a violation has occurred or

 that enforcement action will be taken. Rather, the purpose

 is to discuss the apparent violations, their causes and

 safety significance; to provide the licensee an opportunity

 to point out any errors that may have been made in the NRC

 inspection report; and to enable the company to outline its
 proposed corrective actions.

 

 No decision on the apparent violations or any

 contemplated enforcement action, such as a civil penalty,

 will be made at this conference. Those decisions will be

 made by senior NRC officials at a later time.

 

 The conference will be open to the public as part of a

 trial program to open some of these sessions for public

 observation.
*INNOVATIVE FINANCE*
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report of Sierra Wireless, Inc. (the “Corporation”) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jason W. Cohenour, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

 

Dated at Richmond, British Columbia, Canada this March 18, 2011.

 

 
| /s/ JASON W. COHENOUR   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Jason W. Cohenour       |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

 

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Corporation for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

----

 

**CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report of Sierra Wireless, Inc. (the “Corporation”) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David G. McLennan, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

 

Dated at Richmond, British Columbia, Canada this March 18, 2011.

 

 
| /s/ DAVID G. MCLENNAN   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| David G. McLennan       |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

 

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Corporation for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

2

----