alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Salomon Smith Barney AAA Energy Fund L.P. II (the"Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the periodending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr., Chief Financial Officer and Director ofCitigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities         Exchange Act of1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial         conditionand results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe,Jr.

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

Daniel R.McAuliffe, Jr. Citigroup Managed Futures LLC Chief FinancialOfficer and Director

August 9,2005

----
#### Lisa Bates Pristavec et al., Respondents, v Thomas Galligan et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

[820 NYS2d 529]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for dental malpractice, the defendants Thomas Galligan, Drs. Galligan and Villa, LLP and Gerard Villa appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Maltese, J.), dated November 22, 2005, as granted their motion pursuant to CPLR 3012 (b) to dismiss the action insofar as asserted against them for failure to timely serve a complaint only to the extent of dismissing the causes of action alleging dental malpractice, and granted the plaintiffs’ cross motion to extend their time pursuant to CPLR 3012 (d) to serve the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

To avoid dismissal for failure to timely serve a complaint after a demand therefor has been served pursuant to CPLR 3012 (b), a plaintiff must demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for the delay in serving the complaint and a meritorious cause of action *(see Maldonado v Suffolk County,*23 AD3d 353 [2005]; *Giordano v Vanchieri & Perrier,*16 AD3d 621 [2005]; *Tutora v Schirripa,*1 AD3d 349 [2003]). The determination of what con*835stitutes a reasonable excuse for a default lies within the sound discretion of the Supreme Court *(see Low Surgical & Med. Supply, Inc. v McAfee,*15 AD3d 547 [2005]; *Carnazza v Shoprite of Staten Is.,*12 AD3d 393 [2004]; *Adams v Alexander,*291 AD2d 467 [2002]). Contrary to the appellants’ contention, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in finding that the plaintiff offered a reasonable excuse for her delay in serving the complaint *(see Low Surgical & Med. Supply, Inc. v McAfee, supra; Carnazza v Shoprite of Staten Is., supra; Fine v Fine,*12 AD3d 399 [2004]; *Du Jour v DeJean,*247 AD2d 370 [1998]). Furthermore, the plaintiff adequately demonstrated the potential merit of those of her causes of action which are predicated upon ordinary negligence rather than dental malpractice, and there is no indication that the appellants were prejudiced by her relatively short delay in serving a complaint *(see Lewis v St. Francis Hosp.,*10 AD3d 678 [2004]; *Klosterman v Federal Express Co.,*271 AD2d 492 [2000]; *Kramer v Rosenthal,*204 AD2d 406 [1994]). Schmidt, J.P., Crane, Krausman, Skelos and Lunn, JJ., concur.
### §13294. Compliance with existing law

Nothing in this subchapter shall be deemed to convey to any person, partnership, corporation, or other entity, immunity from civil or criminal liability under any antitrust law or to create defenses to actions under any antitrust law.

(Pub. L. 102–486, title VI, §624, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2905.)
EXHIBIT 23.1

# CONSENT OF
REGISTERED INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements of Pavilion Bancorp, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No.
333-86636) and Form S-3D (File No. 333-112651) of our report dated March 1, 2006 on the
2005 Consolidated Financial Statements of Pavilion Bancorp, Inc., which report is
included in the 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pavilion Bancorp, Inc.

|/s/ Plante & Moran,
PLLC Plante & Moran, PLLC
|---------------------------------------------

Auburn Hills,
MichiganMarch 16, 2006
#### § 5.61 Prehearing procedures; motions; interlocutory appeals; summary decision; discovery; compulsory process.

Because of the nature of the issues involved in proceedings under this part, the Commission anticipates that extensive motions, prehearing proceedings and discovery will not be required in most cases. For this reason, detailed procedures will not be established under this part. However, to the extent deemed warranted by the presiding official, prehearing conferences, motions, interlocutory appeals, summary decisions, discovery and compulsory process shall be permitted and shall be governed, where appropriate, by the provisions set forth in subparts C and D, part 3, of the Commission's Rules of Practice.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of ARC Corporate Realty Trust, Inc.® (ACRT) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Robert J. Ambrosi, Chief Executive Officer of ACRT,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of ACRT.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Robert J. Ambrosi  
|Robert J. Ambrosi      
|Chief Executive Officer
|August 6, 2004
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §
1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the Form 10-Q) of
Surrey Bancorp (the Company), we, Edward C. Ashby, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Mark H.Towe, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:

(a) the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.



| |  |     |  |                                                |  |  |  |                       |  | 
| |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------- |  | 
| |  | By: |  | /s/Edward C. Ashby, III                        |  |  |  | Date: August 13, 2008 |  | 
| |  |     |  | Edward C. Ashby, III.                         
| |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer         
| |  |     |  |                                                | 
| |  | By: |  | /s/ Mark H. Towe                               |  |  |  | Date: August 13, 2008 |  | 
| |  |     |  | Mark H. Towe                                  
| |  |     |  | Sr. Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer



39
§ 997.22 Membership policy. The application shall describe: ( a ) The process by which individuals or organizations may formally participate in the governance activities of the RCOS;
( b ) The rights and responsibilities of this participation;
( c ) The process by which the RCOS strives for organizational diversity through intra-regional geographic representation, and diversity of activities and interests from both public and private sectors; and
( d ) How the RCOS allows for participation from adjacent regions or nations.
#### § 301.46 Reference to guaranty by Government prohibited.

No representation nor suggestion that a fur or fur product is guaranteed under the act by the Government, or any branch thereof, shall be made in the labeling, invoicing or advertising in connection therewith.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 230 (Wednesday, December 1, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 69894]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26430]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by January 
3, 2005.
    Title, Form, and OMB Number: End-Use Certificate; DLA Form 1822; 
OMB Control Number 0704-0382.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 40,000.
    Response Per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 40,000.
    Average Burden Per Response: 20 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 13,200.
    Needs and Uses: All individuals wishing to acquire government 
property identified as Munitions List Items (MLI) or Commerce Control 
List Item (CCLI) must complete this form each time they enter into a 
transaction. It is used to clear recipients to ensure their eligibility 
to conduct business with the government. That they are not debarred 
bidders; Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) or Blocked Persons; have 
not violated U.S. export laws; will not divert the property to denied/
sanctioned countries, unauthorized destinations or sell to debarred/
Bidder Experience List firms or individuals. The EUC informs the 
recipients that when this property is to be exported, they must comply 
with the International Traffic in Arms Regulation (ITAR), 22 CFR 129 et 
seq.; Export Administration Regulations (EAR), 15 CFR 730 et seq.; 
Office of Foreign Asset Controls (OFAC), 331 CFR 500 et seq.; and the 
United States Customs Service rules and regulations.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households; business or other for-
profit; not-for-profit institutions.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain a benefit.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jacqueline Zeiher.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Ms. Zeiher at the Office of Management and 
Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings, WHS/ESCD/Information Management 
Division, 1225 South Clark Street, Suite 504, Arlington, VA 22202-4326.

    Dated: November 22, 2004.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 04-26430 Filed 11-30-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 30, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 69618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26422]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

Notice of Intent To Prepare Comprehensive Conservation Plan and 
Environmental Assessment for the Lacreek National Wildlife Refuge 
Complex, Martin, SD

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service intends to gather 
information necessary to prepare a Comprehensive Conservation Plan and 
associated environmental documents for the Lacreek National Wildlife 
Refuge Complex located in South Dakota. The Service is issuing this 
notice in compliance with its policy to advise other organizations and 
the public of its intentions and to obtain suggestions and information 
on the scope of issues to be considered in the planning process.

DATES: Written comments should be received by January 1, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Comments and request for more information should be sent to: 
Lacreek NWR Planning Project, HC5 Box 114, Martin, South Dakota 57551.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda Kelly, Refuge Planner, Division 
of Refuge Planning, P.O. Box 25486, DFC, Denver, Colorado 80225; (303) 
236-8132.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Service has initiated comprehensive 
conservation planning for the management of its natural resources. The 
complex consists of Bear Butte NWR, located southeast of Sturgis, South 
Dakota, and Lacreek NWR and Wetland Management District located near 
Martin, South Dakota in the southwestern part of the state.
    Comprehensive planning will develop management goals, objectives, 
and strategies to carry out the purposes of the Complex's refuges and 
Wetland Management District, and comply with laws and policies 
governing refuge management and public use of refuges. Opportunities 
will be provided for public input at open houses to be held near 
Lacreek and Bear Butte Refuges.
    All information provided voluntarily by mail, phone, or at public 
meetings becomes part of the official public record (i.e. names, 
addresses, letters of comment, input recorded during meetings). If 
requested under the Freedom of Information Act by a private citizen or 
organization, the Service may provide copies of such information. The 
environmental impact assessment of this project will be conducted in 
accordance with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy 
Act of 1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), NEPA Regulations (40 
CFR 1500-1508), other appropriate Federal laws and regulations, 
Executive Order 12996, and the National Wildlife Refuge System 
Improvement Act of 1997, and Service policies and procedures for 
compliance with those regulations.

    Dated: October 15, 2004.
Sharon R. Rose,
Acting Regional Director, Region 6, Denver, Colorado.
[FR Doc. 04-26422 Filed 11-29-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
```
Amendment dated July 25, 2007 to Financing Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.63 
 July 25, 2007 
 EDGAR ONLINE, INC 
 50 Washington St. 
 Norwalk, CT 06854 
 Gentlemen: 
 It is mutually agreed that the financing agreement entered into between us dated April 5, 2007 as amended or
supplemented (the “Financing Agreement”) is amended effective June 30, 2007 as follows: 
 Section 6.9 of the Financing
Agreement is amended by decreasing the Tangible Net Worth amount to $50,000.00 and increasing the Working Capital deficit amount to $2,500,000.00. The amended section shall now read as follows: 
 “6.9 Borrower shall until payment in full of all Obligations to Lender and termination of this Agreement (a) cause to be maintained at the end
of each fiscal quarter (i.e., December, March, June, September), Tangible Net Worth in an amount not less than $50,000.00 and (b) cause to be maintained at the end of each such fiscal quarter, a Working Capital deficit of not more than
$2,500,000.00.” 
 Except as hereinabove specifically set forth the Financing Agreement, shall continue unmodified. 
  

			
	ROSENTHAL & ROSENTHAL, NC.
		
	By:  	 	 /s/ Ian Brown

		 	Ian Brown
		 	Vice President


  

			
	THE FOREGOING IS ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO:
	
	EDGAR ONLINE, INC.
		
	BY:	 	 /s/ Greg D. Adams

		
	Name & Title:	 	 CFO & CEO
#### § 312.1 Scope of regulations in this part.

This part implements the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998, (15 U.S.C. 6501, *et seq.,*) which prohibits unfair or deceptive acts or practices in connection with the collection, use, and/or disclosure of personal information from and about children on the Internet.
§ 1304.1 Scope and application. ( a ) In this part 1304 the Consumer Product Safety Commission declares that consumer patching compounds containing intentionally-added respirable freeform asbestos in such a manner that the asbestos fibers can become airborne under reasonably foreseeable conditions of use, are banned hazardous products under sections 8 and 9 of the Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA) (15 U.S.C. 2057 and 2058). This ban applies to patching compounds which are ( 1 ) used to cover, seal or mask cracks, joints, holes and similar openings in the trim, walls, ceiling, etc. of building interiors, which after drying are sanded to a smooth finish and
( 2 ) are produced and distributed for sale to or for the personal use, consumption or enjoyment of a consumer in or around a permanent or temporary household or residence, a school, in recreation or otherwise.
( b ) The Commission has found that ( 1 ) these patching compounds are being or will be distributed in commerce;
( 2 ) that they present an unreasonable risk of injury; and
( 3 ) that no feasible consumer product safety standard under the CPSA would adequately protect the public from the unreasonable risk of injury associated with these products. This rule applies to the banned hazardous products defined in § 1304.3 and described further in § 1304.4.
( c ) Only consumer products are subject to this regulation. Patching compounds which are consumer products include those which a consumer can purchase. Merely labeling a patching compound for industrial use would not exclude such articles from the ban. If the sale or use of the product by consumers is facilitated, it is subject to the ban. Patching compounds which are labeled as, marketed, and sold solely for industrial use in non-consumer environments are not subject to the ban. In addition to those products which can be sold directly to consumers, the ban applies to patching compounds containing respirable free-form asbestos which are used in residences, schools, hospitals, public buildings or other areas where consumers have customary access.
IN RESPONSE, PLEASE 

 REFER TO: M151217B 

December 17, 2015 

MEMORANDUM FOR: Brooke P. Clark, Director 

Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication 

FROM: Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS – AFFIRMATION SESSION, 12:55 

P.M., THURSDAY, DECEMBER 17, 2015, COMMISSIONERS' 

CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH, 

ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND (OPEN TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE) 

I. SECY-15-0119 – FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. (TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR 

GENERATING UNITS 3 AND 4) – APPEALS OF LBP-15-13

The Commission approved a Memorandum and Order responding to appeals by Florida Power 

& Light Company and the NRC Staff of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board’s decision in 

LBP-15-13 granting a hearing to Citizens Allied for Safe Energy, Inc. in the matter of Florida 

Power & Light’s license amendment request to allow an increase in the ultimate heat sink 

temperature at Turkey Point. The Memorandum and Order affirms the Board’s decision. 

(Subsequently, on December 17, 2015, the Secretary signed the Memorandum and Order.) 

Enclosure: 

As stated 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 EDO 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCAA 

 OCA 

 OIG 

 OPA 

 ODs, RAs, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of
ADA-ES, Inc. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I, Michael D. Durham, certify that:
In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of ADA-ES, Inc.
(the "Company) for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Michael D. Durham, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

/s/ Michael D. Durham
---------------------
Name: Michael D. Durham
Title: President
Date: August 5, 2004


I, Mark H. McKinnies, certify that:
In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of ADA-ES, Inc.
(the "Company) for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Mark H. McKinnies, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.


/s/ Mark H. McKinnies
---------------------
Name: Mark H. McKinnies
Title: CFO
Date: August 5, 2004
**EXHIBIT 10.1**

 

Mindspeed Technologies, Inc.(the “Company”) has entered into an agreement with each of the followingpersons, which is substantially identical, except as set forth below, to the Form ofEmployment Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.8.1 to the Company’s RegistrationStatement on Form 10 (File No. 1-31650):

 

Najabat H. Bajwa

 

Kurt Busch

 

Jing Cao

 

Ron Cates

 

 Raouf Y. Halim

 

Gerald J. Hamilton

 

Thomas J. Medrek

 

Thomas O. Morton

 

Thomas A. Stites

 

Preetinder S. Virk

 

The multiple set forth inSection 6(i)(B) of the Employment Agreement for Mr. Halim isthree and the multiple set forth in Section 6(i)(B) of the EmploymentAgreement for the other persons is two.

 

----
§ 1.98 Adjustment of civil monetary penalty amounts. This section makes inflation adjustments in the dollar amounts of civil monetary penalties provided by law within the Commission's jurisdiction. The following maximum civil penalty amounts apply only to penalties assessed after January 10, 2024, including those penalties whose associated violation predated January 10, 2024. ( a ) Section 7A(g)(1) of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. 18a(g)(1)—$51,744;
( b ) Section 11(*l*) of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. 21(*l*)—$27,491;
( c ) Section 5(*l*) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 45(*l*)—$51,744;
( d ) Section 5(m)(1)(A) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 45(m)(1)(A)—$51,744;
( e ) Section 5(m)(1)(B) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 45(m)(1)(B)—$51,744;
( f ) Section 10 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 50—$680;
( g ) Section 5 of the Webb-Pomerene (Export Trade) Act, 15 U.S.C. 65—$680;
( h ) Section 6(b) of the Wool Products Labeling Act, 15 U.SC. 68d(b)—$680;
( i ) Section 3(e) of the Fur Products Labeling Act, 15 U.S.C. 69a(e)—$680;
( j ) Section 8(d)(2) of the Fur Products Labeling Act, 15 U.S.C. 69f(d)(2)—$680;
( k ) Section 333(a) of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, 42 U.S.C. 6303(a)—$560;
( l ) Sections 525(a) and (b) of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, 42 U.S.C. 6395(a) and (b), respectively—$27,491 and $51,744, respectively;
( m ) Section 621(a)(2) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. 1681s(a)(2)—$4,857;
( n ) Section 1115(a) of the Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003, Public Law 108-173, as amended by Public Law 115-263, 21 U.S.C. 355 note—$18,293;
( o ) Section 814(a) of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, 42 U.S.C. 17304—$1,472,546; and
( p ) Civil monetary penalties authorized by reference to the Federal Trade Commission Act under any other provision of law within the jurisdiction of the Commission—refer to the amounts set forth in paragraphs (c), (d), (e) and (f) of this section, as applicable.
[89 FR 1447, Jan. 10, 2024]