alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 702.1 Definitions. ( a ) *The Act* means the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Federal Trade Commission Improvement Act, 15 U.S.C. 2301, *et seq.*
( b ) *Consumer product* means any tangible personal property which is distributed in commerce and which is normally used for personal, family, or household purposes (including any such property intended to be attached to or installed in any real property without regard to whether it is so attached or installed). Products which are purchased solely for commercial or industrial use are excluded solely for purposes of this part.
( c ) *Written warranty* means— ( 1 ) Any written affirmation of fact or written promise made in connection with the sale of a consumer product by a supplier to a buyer which relates to the nature of the material or workmanship and affirms or promises that such material or workmanship is defect free or will meet a specified level of performance over a specified period of time, or
( 2 ) Any undertaking in writing in connection with the sale by a supplier of a consumer product to refund, repair, replace or take other remedial action with respect to such product in the event that such product fails to meet the specifications set forth in the undertaking, which written affirmation, promise, or undertaking becomes part of the basis of the bargain between a supplier and a buyer for purposes other than resale of such product.
( d ) *Warrantor* means any supplier, manufacturer, or other person who gives or offers to give a written warranty.
( e ) *Seller* means any person who sells or offers for sale for purposes other than resale or use in the ordinary course of the buyer's business any consumer product.
( f ) *Supplier* means any person engaged in the business of making a consumer product directly or indirectly available to consumers.
( g ) *Manufacturer* means any person engaged in the business of making a consumer product.
[40 FR 60189, Dec. 31, 1975, as amended at 52 FR 7574, Mar. 12, 1987; 81 FR 63669, Sept. 15, 2016]
#### Bon Ray Hotel Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Ben-Irv Holding Co., Inc., Defendant. In the Matter of I. Arnold Ross, Appellant. Bon Ray Hotel Corporation et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
#### Roberts Numbering Machine Company, Inc., v. Black Heat Electric Corporation.

Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 824.]
Issue Date: 06/20/14 1 14-013

NRC INSPECTION MANUAL DIRS

Change Notice 14-013

DELETED: TRANSMITTED:

Number Date Number Date

1. IMC 1247 App C2 02/18/09 IMC 1247 App C2 06/20/14

2. IP 65001.16 10/03/07 IP 65001.16 06/20/14

3. IP 65001.E 08/19/08 IP 65001.E 06/20/14

4. TI 2515/166 rev 1 05/16/07

5. TI 2515/173 rev 1 10/31/08

6. TI 2515/174 02/12/08

7. TI 2515/178 05/15/09

8. TI 2515/181 04/14/10

9. TI 2515/185 rev 1 12/19/11

TRAINING: No

REMARKS: IMC 1247 Appendix C2, “Fuel Facility Health Physics Inspector Technical 

Proficiency Training and Qualification Journal,” has been revised to update both 

required and refresher training requirements. Dome of the trainings have been 

replaced or removed because they are no longer offered. The OSHA 

HAZWOPER course has been moved to IMC 1247 Appendix A.

IP 65001.16, “Inspection of ITAAC-Related Engineering,” has been revised as a 

periodic update.

IP 65001.E, “Inspection of ITAAC-Related Engineering,” has been revised as a 

periodic update. Sections 01.02 and 02.02 have been deleted at the request of 

NRO/COLB. There are no ITAAC for simulators.

The following Temporary Instructions have been completed and will be deleted:

TI 2515/166 rev 1, “Pressurized Water Reactor Containment Sump Blockage 

(NRC Generic Letter 2004-02)”

TI 2515/173 rev 1, “Review of the Implementation of the Industry Ground Water 

Protection Voluntary Initiative”
Issue Date: 06/20/14 2 14-013

TI 2515/174, “Hydrogen Igniter Backup Power Verification”

TI 2515/178, “Risk Management Technical Specifications Initiative 5b 

Surveillance Frequency Control Program”

TI 2515/181, “Validate the Effectiveness of the Regulatory Infrastructure Related 

to Fire-Induced Circuit Failures and Operator Manual Actions”

TI 2515/185 rev 1, “Follow-up to the Review of the Implementation of the Industry 

Ground Water Protection Voluntary Initiative”

DISTRIBUTION: Standard

END
#### Theresa Eramo, Appellant, v. F. W. Woolworth Company, Respondent.

Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Kimball and Piper, JJ.
§ 1028.114 Cooperative research. ( a ) Cooperative research projects are those projects covered by this policy that involve more than one institution. In the conduct of cooperative research projects, each institution is responsible for safeguarding the rights and welfare of human subjects and for complying with this policy.
( b ) ( 1 ) Any institution located in the United States that is engaged in cooperative research must rely upon approval by a single IRB for that portion of the research that is conducted in the United States. The reviewing IRB will be identified by the Federal department or agency supporting or conducting the research or proposed by the lead institution subject to the acceptance of the Federal department or agency supporting the research.
( 2 ) The following research is not subject to this provision: ( i ) Cooperative research for which more than single IRB review is required by law (including tribal law passed by the official governing body of an American Indian or Alaska Native tribe); or
( ii ) Research for which any Federal department or agency supporting or conducting the research determines and documents that the use of a single IRB is not appropriate for the particular context.
( c ) For research not subject to paragraph (b) of this section, an institution participating in a cooperative project may enter into a joint review arrangement, rely on the review of another IRB, or make similar arrangements for avoiding duplication of effort.
No: II-15-001 January 5, 2015

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

 Joey Ledford 404-997-4416

ASLB Schedules Oral Argument Session on Turkey Point Canal Temperature Issue

The Atomic Safety and Licensing Board will hear oral arguments on Jan. 14 in Homestead, Fla., 

on a challenge to license amendments that increase the water temperature limit for the cooling canal 

system of Florida Power & Light’s Turkey Point nuclear plant.

The ASLB is the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s independent body charged with conducting 

adjudicatory hearings and deciding legal challenges to the agency’s licensing and enforcement actions. 

FPL operates the two-unit Turkey Point plant near Homestead.

The oral argument is scheduled to commence at 9 a.m. on Jan. 14 at the Hampton Inn and Suites, 

2855 NE 9th St., in Homestead.

A petitioner, Citizens Allied for Safe Energy, has filed four proposed contentions regarding the 

license amendments granted to FPL last fall that allowed the company to increase the ultimate heat sink 

water temperature for the plant’s external cooling canal system. CASE contends the higher 

temperatures will increase the salinity, tritium and chloride in the canal system to unsafe levels. The 

group further alleges that the change in the Turkey Point license damages the environment.

The Jan. 14 ASLB session will focus on whether CASE has legal standing and whether the four 

submitted contentions are admissible for further adjudication.

The oral argument session is open to the public, but the board will only hear arguments from 

counsel for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and FPL, or from authorized representatives for 

CASE, FPL and the NRC staff. As a result, no witnesses or members of the public will be heard. The 

board anticipates that the arguments will be completed by 5 p.m. on Jan. 14.
No: IV-14-027 December 30, 2014

CONTACT: Victor Dricks (817) 200-1128

Lara Uselding (817) 200-1519

NRC Schedules Regulatory Conference to Discuss 

Apparent Violation at Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with officials from Pacific Gas & Electric 

Co. (PG&E) on Jan. 14 to discuss the safety significance of an apparent violation related to the Diablo 

Canyon nuclear power plant emergency preparedness plan. The plant is located near San Luis Obispo, 

Calif.

The meeting will be held from 1-4 p.m. Central Time at the NRC’s Region IV Offices at 1600 

E. Lamar Blvd., in Arlington, Texas. NRC officials will answer questions from the public after the 

business portion of the conference. A telephone bridge will be available for the meeting by calling 1-

888-469-0950 and entering passcode 34924.

The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess nuclear 

plant performance. The colors start with green and then increase to white, yellow, or red in order of 

increasing safety significance. The NRC has preliminarily determined that the severity level III 

violation has low to moderate safety significance, or is “white.” 

During an NRC inspection, inspectors identified that the licensee’s emergency plan did not 

include a measure to recommend evacuation of the public for areas over the ocean within the 10-mile 

emergency planning zone. Upon further review, the inspectors determined that the licensee had 

changed its procedure without prior NRC approval as is required if a change decreases the effectiveness 

of those plans. In this case, PG&E did not identify the change as a decrease in effectiveness and 

therefore did not request NRC approval. 

The licensee has resolved this issue and put measures in place to prevent a recurrence. 

Licensees recommend protective actions to local and state officials, who then make the actual call 

about what protective actions the public should take. In this case, the county had procedures in place 

that included evaluating the ocean for evacuation. At no time was the public going to be allowed to stay 

in an area that had the potential for radioactivity if an event had occurred.

No decision on the final safety significance of the findings or any additional NRC actions will 

be made at the conference. That decision will be announced at a later date.
### SUBCHAPTER XI—CONTROL OF INFORMATION
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Continental Bank and Trust Company of New York et al., as Trustees, Respondents, against Harry B. Chambers et al., Constituting the Tax Commission of the City of New York, Appellants. [150 Broadway, Borough of Manhattan.]

No opinion. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York v. Isidor Weisbrot.

Motion granted. Present—Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Page, JJ.
#### § 1034.151 Program accessibility: New construction and alterations.

Each building or part of a building that is constructed or altered by, on behalf of, or for the use of the agency shall be designed, constructed, or altered so as to be readily accessible to and usable by handicapped persons. The definitions, requirements, and standards of the Architectural Barriers Act (42 U.S.C. 4151-4157), as established in 41 CFR 101-19.600 to 101-19.607, apply to buildings covered by this section.
No: II-16-013 March 24, 2016

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416

NRC Issues Chilling Effect Letter to TVA to Address Watts Bar 

Nuclear Plant Work Environment Issues

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a chilling effect letter to the Tennessee Valley 

Authority after determining that a “chilled work environment” exists within the operations staff at the 

Watts Bar nuclear power plant near Spring City, Tenn., about 60 miles southwest of Knoxville.

An NRC review into the Watts Bar work environment found that some operations employees

may not have felt free to raise safety concerns, and some licensed operators may have been unduly

influenced and directed by sources external to the control room.

The NRC held a meeting with TVA officials in Atlanta on March 22 to discuss the agency’s 

concerns and TVA’s corrective actions.

“While we believe TVA management understands these issues, the chilling effect letter 

documents the NRC concerns and our expectations that TVA fully address them and ensure that all 

plant employees feel free to raise any safety problems,” said NRC Region II Administrator Cathy 

Haney.

TVA officials must respond to the letter within 30 days with a plan describing how the work 

environment concerns will be addressed. About two weeks after the TVA plan is received, the NRC

will schedule a public meeting with TVA to discuss its plan as well as NRC monitoring and inspection 

of corrective actions.
### §12834. Uniform recordkeeping and reports to Congress

#### (a) Uniform requirements

The Secretary shall develop and establish uniform recordkeeping, performance reporting, and auditing requirements for use by participating jurisdictions.

#### (b) Omitted

(Pub. L. 101–625, title II, §284, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4126.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Subsec. (b) of this section, which required the Secretary to make an annual report to Congress that summarizes and assesses the results of reports provided under this section, terminated, effective May 15, 2000, pursuant to section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, as amended, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance. See, also, the 3rd item on page 102 of House Document No. 103–7.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3683 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to delay implementation 

of the Medicare hospital readmissions reduction program for 5 years, 

to require Congressional approval for additional applicable conditions, 

and to provide for a report on potential impact of such program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 15, 2011 

Ms. BUERKLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to delay 

implementation of the Medicare hospital readmissions reduction program for 5 years, to require Congressional 

approval for additional applicable conditions, and to provide for a report on potential impact of such program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hospital Admissions 

5 in Need of Study Act of 2011’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3683 IH

1 SEC. 2. 5-YEAR DELAY IN IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MEDI2 CARE HOSPITAL READMISSIONS REDUCTION 

3 PROGRAM; LIMITATION ON EXPANSION OF 

4 APPLICABLE CONDITIONS; REPORT. 

5 (a) 5-YEAR DELAY.—Subsection (q) of section 1886 

6 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww) is amend7 ed— 

8 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘2012’’ and 

9 inserting ‘‘2017’’; 

10 (2) in paragraph (2)(B)(i), by striking ‘‘2012 

11 and 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘2017 and 2018’’; 

12 (3) in paragraph (3)(C), by striking ‘‘fiscal year 

13 2013’’, ‘‘fiscal year 2014’’, and ‘‘fiscal year 2015’’ 

14 and inserting ‘‘fiscal year 2018’’, ‘‘fiscal year 2019’’, 

15 and ‘‘fiscal year 2020’’ in clauses (i), (ii), and (iii), 

16 respectively; and 

17 (4) in paragraph (5)(B), by striking ‘‘fiscal year 

18 2015,’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal year 2020,’’. 

19 (b) REQUIRING CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL FOR EX20 PANSION OF APPLICABLE CONDITIONS.—Paragraph 

21 (5)(B) of such section is amended— 

22 (1) by striking ‘‘Beginning’’ and inserting ‘‘(ii) 

23 Subject to clause (ii), beginning’’ ; and 

24 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

25 clause: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3683 IH

1 ‘‘(ii) The Secretary may not expand the 

2 applicable conditions under clause (i) except to 

3 the extent specified in a subsequent law.’’. 

4 (c) REPORT ON POTENTIAL IMPACT.—Such section 

5 is further amended by adding at the end the following new 

6 paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(9) REPORT.—The Secretary shall conduct a 

8 study that estimates the payment reductions that 

9 would have occurred under this subsection during 

10 fiscal years 2013, 2014, and 2015 if this subsection 

11 had been in effect during such fiscal years. Not later 

12 than April 1, 2016, the Secretary shall submit to 

13 Congress a report on such study, the impact that 

14 such a payment reduction would have made on hos15 pitals.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Irving Trust Company, as Successor Trustee of the Trust Created by an Indenture of Trust Made by Mabel L. Pressinger, Respondent, against Eve M. Fish, Appellant.

Order [directing appellant to render and settle account of deceased trustee] unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Appeal [from order appointing successor trustee] unanimously dismissed. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Botein, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3592 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3592

To provide that the Postal Service may not close any post office which 
results in more than 10 miles distance (as measured on roads with year-
               round access) between any 2 post offices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 7, 2011

 Mr. DeFazio introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that the Postal Service may not close any post office which 
results in more than 10 miles distance (as measured on roads with year-
               round access) between any 2 post offices.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Rural Post Offices Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON CLOSING OF POST OFFICES.

    Section 404(d) of title 39, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(7) Notwithstanding any other provision of this subsection, in 
making any determination under subsection (a)(3) as to the necessity 
for the closing or consolidation of any post office, the Postal Service 
may not close any post office which results in more than 10 miles 
distance (as measured on roads with year-round access) between any 2 
post offices.''.
                                 <all>
```
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-16-0040:  Closure of Petition for Rulemaking, C-10 Research and Education Foundation, Inc. (PRM-72-6; NRC-2008-0649)

Accession Number: ML15272A339

Date Released: Monday, June 27, 2016

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML15272A363 - SECY-16-0040:  Closure of Petition for Rulemaking, C-10 Research and Education Foundation, Inc. (PRM-72-6; NRC-2008-0649). (6 page(s), 4/1/2016)
    - ML15272A364 - SECY-16-0040:  Draft Federal Register Notice, Petition for Rulemaking; Denial:  Petition for Rulemaking Submitted by C-10 Research and Education Foundation, Inc. (PRM-72-6)(Encl. 1). (17 page(s), 4/1/2016)
    - ML15272A373 - 06/20/16, Letter to Sandra Gavutis, C-10 Research and Education Foundation, Inc. from Annette Vietti-Cook denying her petition for rulemaking on independent spent fuel storage installation security (PRM-72-6). (2 page(s), 6/20/2016)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
----

----

|   | (1) | The Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Michael V. Shustek                                   |
|----------------------------------------------------------|
| Michael V. Shustek                                       |
| Chief Executive Officer and Director*                    |
| of Vestin Mortgage, Inc., sole Manager of the Registrant |

| /s/Rocio Revollo                                         |
|----------------------------------------------------------|
| Rocio Revollo                                            |
| Chief Financial Officer**                                |
| of Vestin Mortgage, Inc., sole Manager of the Registrant |
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Raouf Y. Halim, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Mindspeed Technologies, Inc.; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 15, 2013



/s/ RAOUF Y. HALIMRaouf Y. Halim Chief
Executive Officer




6
§ 317.3 Prohibited practices. It shall be unlawful for any person, directly or indirectly, in connection with the purchase or sale of crude oil, gasoline, or petroleum distillates at wholesale, to: ( a ) Knowingly engage in any act, practice, or course of business—including the making of any untrue statement of material fact—that operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person; or
( b ) Intentionally fail to state a material fact that under the circumstances renders a statement made by such person misleading, provided that such omission distorts or is likely to distort market conditions for any such product.
#### § 460.2 What is home insulation.

Insulation is any material mainly used to slow heat flow. It may be mineral or organic, fibrous, cellular, or reflective. It may be in rigid, semirigid, flexible, or loose-fill form. Home insulation is for use in old or new homes, condominiums, cooperatives, apartments, modular homes, or mobile homes. It does not include pipe insulation. It does not include any kind of duct insulation except for duct wrap. It also includes insulation developed and marketed for commercial or industrial buildings that is also marketed for and used in residential buildings.

[84 FR 20788, May 13, 2019]
#### Emilie Voigt, Respondent, v. Bischoff's Banking House, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present—Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Smith, JJ.