Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 231 / Thursday, December 2, 2004 / Proposed Rules 70091

authority delegated to the Commissioner 

of Food and Drugs, it is proposed that 

21 CFR part 165 be amended as follows:

PART 165—BEVERAGES

1. The authority citation for 21 CFR 

part 165 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 343, 343–1, 

348, 349, 371, 379e.

2. Section 165.110 is amended by 

removing the entry for ‘‘Arsenic’’ in the 

table in paragraph (b)(4)(i)(A), by 

revising paragraph (b)(4)(iii)(A) and the 

introductory text of paragraph 

(b)(4)(iii)(E), and by adding paragraph 

(b)(4)(iii)(E)(14) to read as follows:

§ 165.110 Bottled water.

* * * * *

(b) * * *

(4) * * *

(iii) * * *

(A) The allowable levels for inorganic 

substances are as follows:

Contaminant Concentration in milligrams per liter (or as specified) 

Arsenic ..................................................................................................................... 0.010.

Antimony .................................................................................................................. 006.

Barium ...................................................................................................................... 2.

Beryllium .................................................................................................................. 0.004.

Cadmium .................................................................................................................. 0.005.

Chromium ................................................................................................................ 0.1.

Copper ..................................................................................................................... 1.0.

Cyanide .................................................................................................................... 0.2.

Lead ......................................................................................................................... 0.005.

Mercury .................................................................................................................... 0.002.

Nickel ....................................................................................................................... 0.1.

Nitrate ...................................................................................................................... 10 (as nitrogen).

Nitrite ........................................................................................................................ 1 (as nitrogen).

Total Nitrate and Nitrite ........................................................................................... 10 (as nitrogen).

Selenium .................................................................................................................. 0.05.

Thallium ................................................................................................................... 0.002.

* * * * *

(E) Analyses to determine compliance 

with the requirements of paragraph 

(b)(4)(iii)(A) of this section shall be 

conducted in accordance with an 

applicable method and applicable 

revisions to the methods listed in 

paragraphs (b)(4)(iii)(E)(1) through 

(b)(4)(iii)(E)(14) of this section and 

described, unless otherwise noted, in 

‘‘Methods for Chemical Analysis of 

Water and Wastes,’’ U.S. EPA 

Environmental Monitoring and Support 

Laboratory (EMSL), Cincinnati, OH 

45258 (EPA–600/4–79–020), March 

1983, which is incorporated by 

reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 

552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies of this 

publication are available from the 

National Technical Information Service 

(NTIS), U.S. Department of Commerce, 

5825 Port Royal Rd., Springfield, VA 

22161, or may be examined at the 

Center for Food Safety and Applied 

Nutrition’s Library, Food and Drug 

Administration, 5100 Paint Branch 

Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740, or at 

the Office of the Federal Register, 800 

North Capitol St. NW., suite 700, 

Washington, DC.

* * * * *

(14) Arsenic shall be measured using 

the following methods:

(i) Method 200.8—‘‘Determination of 

Trace Elements in Water and Wastes by 

Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass 

Spectroscopy,’’ contained in the manual 

entitled ‘‘Methods for the Determination 

of Metals in Environmental Samples—

Supplement 1,’’ EPA/600/R–94/111, 

May 1994, which is incorporated by 

reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 

552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies of this 

publication are available from NTIS, 

PB95–125472, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 5825 Port Royal Rd., 

Springfield, VA 22161, or may be 

examined at the Center for Food Safety 

and Applied Nutrition’s Library, Food 

and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint 

Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740, 

or at the Office of the Federal Register, 

800 North Capitol St. NW., suite 700, 

Washington, DC.

(ii) Method 200.9—‘‘Determination of 

Trace Elements by Stabilized 

Temperature Platform Graphite Furnace 

Atomic Absorption Spectrometry,’’

contained in the manual entitled 

‘‘Methods for the Determination of 

Metals in Environmental Samples—

Supplement 1,’’ EPA/600/R–94/111, 

May 1994, which is incorporated by 

reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 

552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. The 

availability of this incorporation by 

reference is given in paragraph 

(b)(4)(iii)(E)(14)(i) of this section.

* * * * *

Dated: October 6, 2004.

Jeffrey Shuren,

Assistant Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 04–26531 Filed 11–26–04; 4:44 pm]

BILLING CODE 4160–01–S

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD05–04–209] 

RIN 1625–AA09

Drawbridge Operation Regulations; 

Elizabeth River-Eastern Branch, 

Norfolk, VA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to 

change the regulations that govern the 

operation of the Norfolk Southern (NS) 

Railroad Bridge (NS #V2.8) across 

Eastern Branch of the Elizabeth River, at 

mile 2.7, in Norfolk, VA. The proposed 

change would allow the NS #V2.8 

bridge to be operated from a remote 

location, and to be operated from a 

remote location, and to remain open for 

vessel traffic and only close for train 

crossings and periodic maintenance. 

This proposed rule would make the 

operation of the bridge more efficient, 

because currently the bridge only opens 

on signal, or on signal after notice.

DATES: Comments and related material 

must reach the Coast Guard on or before 

January 18, 2005.

ADDRESSES: You may mail comments 

and related material to Commander 

(obr), Fifth Coast Guard District, Federal 

Building, 1st Floor, 431 Crawford Street, 

Portsmouth, VA 23704–5004. The Fifth 

70092 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 231 / Thursday, December 2, 2004 / Proposed Rules 

Coast Guard District maintains the 

public docket for this rulemaking. 

Comments and material received from 

the public, as well as documents 

indicated in this preamble as being 

available in the docket, will become part 

of this docket and will be available for 

inspection or copying at Commander 

(obr), Fifth Coast Guard District between 

8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Anton Allen, Bridge Management 

Specialist, Fifth Coast Guard District, at 

(757) 398–6227.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Request for Comments 

We encourage you to participate in 

this rulemaking by submitting 

comments and related material. If you 

do so, please include your name and 

address, identify the docket number for 

this rulemaking CGD05–04–209, 

indicate the specific section of this 

document to which each comment 

applies, and give the reason for each 

comment. Please submit all comments 

and related material in an unbound 

format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches, 

suitable for copying. If you would like 

a return receipt, please enclose a 

stamped, self-addressed postcard or 

envelope. We will consider all 

submittals received during the comment 

period. We may change this proposed 

rule in view of them. 

Public Meeting 

We do not now plan to hold a public 

meeting. But you may submit a request 

for a meeting by writing to Commander 

(obr), Fifth Coast Guard District at the 

address under ADDRESSES explaining 

why one would be beneficial. If we 

determine that one would aid this 

rulemaking, we will hold one public 

meeting at a time and place announced 

by a later notice in the Federal Register.

Background and Purpose 

Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC), 

who owns and operates this swing-type 

bridge at mile 2.7 across the Eastern 

Branch of the Elizabeth River, in 

Norfolk, VA, requested a change to the 

current operating procedures set out in 

33 CFR 117.1007(a), which requires the 

draw to open on signal, from 6 a.m. to 

10 p.m., and open on signal with at least 

two hours notice, from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. 

This proposed rule would allow the NS 

Railroad Bridge (NS #V2.8) to remain 

open to vessel traffic and to close only 

for train crossings and periodic 

maintenance. This proposed rule would 

also allow the NS Railroad Bridge (NS 

#V2.8) to be operated from a remote 

location at the NS Railroad Bridge (NS 

#5), at mile 1.1, over the Eastern Branch 

of the Elizabeth River.

NSC has installed closed circuit 

cameras in the area of the bridge and 

directly beneath the bridge, mounted on 

the center pier fender systems on both 

sides. Infrared sensors have also been 

installed to cover the swing radius of 

the bridge. This equipment enhances 

the controller’s ability to monitor vessel 

traffic from the remote location. The 

controller will also monitor marine 

channel 13. 

This change is being requested to 

make the operation of the NS Railroad 

Bridge (NS #V2.8) more efficient. It will 

save operational costs by eliminating 

the continuous presence of bridge 

tenders, and is expected to decrease 

maintenance costs. In addition, the 

draw being left in the open position and 

only closing for train crossings or 

periodic maintenance will provide for 

greater flow of vessel traffic than the 

current regulation. 

Discussion of Proposed Rule 

The Coast Guard proposes to amend 

the regulations governing the NS 

Railroad Bridge (NS #V2.8), at mile 2.7, 

in Norfolk, VA, which currently 

operates on signal. The Coast Guard 

proposes to insert this new specific 

regulation at 33 CFR § 117.1007(a). The 

amended regulation would allow the 

draw of the bridge to be operated 

remotely by the off-site controller at the 

NS Railroad Bridge (NS #5), at mile 1.1, 

over the Eastern Branch of the Elizabeth 

River in Norfolk, VA. 

The draw would remain in the open 

position for navigation and shall only be 

closed for the passage of trains or 

periodic maintenance authorized in 

accordance with subpart A of this part. 

Before the NS Railroad Bridge (NS 

#V2.8) closes for any reason, the remote 

operator will monitor waterway traffic 

in the area with closed circuit cameras 

and infrared sensors mounted on the 

bridge. The bridge would only be closed 

if the off-site remote operator’s visual 

inspection shows that the channel is 

clear and there are no vessels transiting 

in the area. 

While the NS Railroad Bridge (NS 

#V2.8) is moving from the full open to 

the full closed position, the controller 

will maintain constant surveillance of 

the navigation channel to ensure that no 

conflict with maritime traffic exists. In 

the event of failure or obstruction of 

monitoring equipment, the controller 

will stop and return the bridge to the 

full open position to vessels. In these 

situations, a bridge tender must be 

called and on-site within 30 minutes to 

operate the bridge. 

Before closing the draw, the channel 

traffic lights would change from flashing 

green to flashing red, the horn would 

sound five short blasts, and an audio 

voice warning stating, ‘‘Norfolk 

Southern’s Railroad Bridge over the 

Eastern Branch of the Elizabeth River at 

milepost 2.7 will be closing to river 

traffic.’’ Five short blasts of the horn 

would continue until the bridge is 

seated and locked down to vessels, the 

channel traffic lights would continue to 

flash red. 

When the rail traffic has cleared, the 

horn would automatically sound one 

prolonged blast followed by one short 

blast to indicate that the draw of the NS 

Railroad Bridge (NS #V2.8) is about to 

return to its full open position to 

vessels. During the open swing 

movement, the channel traffic lights 

would flash red until the bridge is in the 

full open position. In the full open 

position to vessels, the bridge channel 

lights would flash green followed by an 

announcement stating, ‘‘Security, 

security, security, the Norfolk Southern 

Railroad Bridge at mile 2.7 is open for 

river traffic.’’ Operational information 

will be provided 24 hours a day on 

marine channel 13 and via telephone 

(757) 446–5320. 

The Coast Guard proposes to amend 

33 CFR 117.1007 by revising paragraph 

(a). 

The proposal would also change the 

name of the bridge in paragraph (a) from 

‘‘Norfolk and Western Railroad Bridge’’ 

to ‘‘Norfolk Southern Railroad Bridge’’. 

The name changes would accurately 

reflect the names of this bridge. Text 

modifications to be consistent with 

other proposed changes would be made 

in these paragraphs, as appropriate.

Regulatory Evaluation 

This proposed rule is not a 

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under 

section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, 

Regulatory Planning and Review, and 

does not require an assessment of 

potential costs and benefits under 

section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office 

of Management and Budget has not 

reviewed it under that Order. It is not 

‘‘significant’’ under the regulatory 

policies and procedures of the 

Department of Homeland Security 

(DHS). 

We expect the economic impact of 

this proposed rule to be so minimal that 

a full Regulatory Evaluation under the 

regulatory policies and procedures of 

DHS is unnecessary. We reached this 

conclusion based on the fact that the 

proposed changes have only a minimal 

impact on maritime traffic transiting the 

bridge. Although the NS Railroad Bridge 

(NS #V2.8) will be untended and 

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 231 / Thursday, December 2, 2004 / Proposed Rules 70093

operated from a remote location, 

mariners can continue their transits 

because the bridge will remain open to 

mariners, only to be closed for train 

crossings or periodic maintenance. 

Small Entities 

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered 

whether this proposed rule would have 

a significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises 

small businesses, not-for-profit 

organizations that are independently 

owned and operated and are not 

dominant in their fields, and 

governmental jurisdictions with 

populations of less than 50,000. 

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 

U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule 

would not have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities. 

This proposed rule would not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities for 

the following reason. The rule allows 

the NS Railroad Bridge to operate 

remotely and requires the bridge to 

remain in the open position to vessels 

the majority of the time, only closing for 

train crossings or periodic maintenance. 

If you think that your business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity 

and that this rule would have a 

significant economic impact on it, 

please submit a comment (see

ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it 

qualifies and how and to what degree 

this rule would economically affect it. 

Assistance for Small Entities 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–

121), we want to assist small entities in 

understanding this proposed rule so that 

they can better evaluate its effects on 

them and participate in the rulemaking. 

If the rule would affect your small 

business, organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction and you have questions 

concerning its provisions or options for 

compliance, please contact Waverly W. 

Gregory, Jr., Bridge Administrator, Fifth 

Coast Guard District, (757) 398–6222. 

The Coast Guard will not retaliate 

against small entities that question or 

complain about this rule or any policy 

or action of the Coast Guard. 

Collection of Information 

This proposed rule would call for no 

new collection of information under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501–3520.). 

Federalism 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132, 

federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on State or local governments and 

would either preempt State law or 

impose a substantial direct cost of 

compliance on them. We have analyzed 

this proposed rule under that Order and 

have determined that it does not have 

implications for federalism. 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 or more in any one year. 

Though this proposed rule will not 

result in such an expenditure, we do 

discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 

in this preamble. 

Taking of Private Property 

This proposed rule would not affect a 

taking of private property or otherwise 

have taking implications under 

Executive Order 12630, Governmental 

Actions and Interference with 

Constitutionally Protected Property 

Rights. 

Civil Justice Reform 

This proposed rule meets applicable 

standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform, to minimize litigation, 

eliminate ambiguity, and reduce 

burden. 

Protection of Children 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13045, 

Protection of Children from 

Environmental Health Risks and Safety 

Risks. This rule is not an economically 

significant rule and would not create an 

environmental risk to health or risk to 

safety that might disproportionately 

affect children. 

Indian Tribal Governments

This proposed rule does not have 

tribal implications under Executive 

Order 13175, Consultation and 

Coordination with Indian Tribal 

Governments, because it would not have 

a substantial direct effect on one or 

more Indian tribes, on the relationship 

between the Federal Government and 

Indian tribes, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes. 

Energy Effects 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13211, Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. We have 

determined that it is not a ‘‘significant 

energy action’’ under that order because 

it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’

under Executive Order 12866 and is not 

likely to have a significant adverse effect 

on the supply, distribution, or use of 

energy. The Administrator of the Office 

of Information and Regulatory Affairs 

has not designated it as a significant 

energy action. Therefore, it does not 

require a Statement of Energy Effects 

under Executive Order 13211. 

Technical Standards 

The National Technology Transfer 

and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 

U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use 

voluntary consensus standards in their 

regulatory activities unless the agency 

provides Congress, through the Office of 

Management and Budget, with an 

explanation of why using these 

standards would be inconsistent with 

applicable law or otherwise impractical. 

Voluntary consensus standards are 

technical standards (e.g., specifications 

of materials, performance, design, or 

operation; test methods; sampling 

procedures; and related management 

systems practices) that are developed or 

adopted by voluntary consensus 

standards bodies. 

This proposed rule does not use 

technical standards. Therefore, we did 

not consider the use of voluntary 

consensus standards. 

Environment 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Commandant Instruction 

M16475.lD, which guides the Coast 

Guard in complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have concluded that there are no factors 

in this case that would limit the use of 

a categorical exclusion under section 

2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this 

proposed rule is categorically excluded, 

under figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e) of 

the Instruction, from further 

environmental documentation because 

it has been determined that the 

promulgation of operating regulations 

for drawbridges are categorically 

excluded.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117

Bridges.

70094 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 231 / Thursday, December 2, 2004 / Proposed Rules 

Regulations 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to 

amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:

PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE 

OPERATION REGULATIONS 

1. The authority citation for part 117 

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; Department of 

Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1; 33 

CFR 1.05–1(g); section 117.255 also issued 

under the authority of Pub. L. 102–587, 106 

Stat. 5039.

2. In § 117.1007 revise paragraph (a) 

to read as follows:

§ 117.1007 Elizabeth River—Eastern 

Branch. 

(a) The draw of the Norfolk Southern 

Railroad Bridge (NS #V2.8), mile 2.7 at 

Norfolk, shall operate as follows: 

(1) The draw shall remain in the open 

position for navigation. The draw shall 

only be closed for train crossings or 

periodic maintenance authorized in 

accordance with Subpart A of this part. 

(2) The bridge shall be operated by the 

controller at the Norfolk Southern 

Railroad Bridge (NS #5), mile 1.1, over 

the Eastern Branch of the Elizabeth 

River in Norfolk, VA. The controller 

shall monitor vessel traffic with closed 

circuit cameras and infrared sensors 

covering the swing radius. Operational 

information will be provided 24 hours 

a day on marine channel 13 and via 

telephone (757) 446–5320. 

(3) The bridge shall not be operated 

from the remote location in the 

following events: Failure or obstruction 

of the infrared sensors, closed-circuit 

cameras or marine-radio 

communications, or when controller 

visibility is less than 3⁄4 of a mile. In 

these situations, a bridge tender must be 

called to operate the bridge on-site. 

(4) Before the bridge closes for any 

reason, the remote operator will monitor 

waterway traffic in the area. The bridge 

shall only be closed if the off-site remote 

operator’s visual inspection shows that 

the channel is clear and there are no 

vessels transiting in the area. While the 

bridge is moving, the operator shall 

maintain constant surveillance of the 

navigation channel. 

(5) Before closing the draw, the 

channel traffic lights will change from 

flashing green to flashing red, the horn 

will sound five short blasts, and an 

audio voice warning stating, ‘‘Norfolk 

Southern’s Railroad Bridge over the 

Eastern Branch of the Elizabeth River at 

milepost 2.7 will be closing to river 

traffic.’’ Five short blasts of the horn 

will continue until the bridge is seated 

and locked down to vessels, the channel 

traffic lights will continue to flash red. 

(6) When the rail traffic has cleared, 

the horn will automatically sound one 

prolonged blast followed by one short 

blast to indicate the draw is opening to 

vessel traffic. During the opening swing 

movement, the channel traffic lights 

will flash red until the bridge returns to 

the fully open position. In the full open 

position to vessels, the bridge channel 

lights will flash green followed by an 

announcement stating, ‘‘Security, 

security, security, the Norfolk Southern 

Railroad Bridge at mile 2.7 is open for 

river traffic.’’

* * * * *

Dated: November 22 2004. 

Ben R. Thomason, III, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting 

Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.

[FR Doc. 04–26520 Filed 12–1–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–15–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration

50 CFR Part 229

[Docket No. 041108310–4310–01; I.D. 

100104H]

RIN 0648–AS78

List of Fisheries for 2005

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: The National Marine 

Fisheries Service (NMFS) is publishing 

the proposed List of Fisheries (LOF) for 

2005, as required by the Marine 

Mammal Protection Act (MMPA). The 

proposed LOF for 2005 reflects new 

information on interactions between 

commercial fisheries and marine 

mammals. NMFS must categorize each 

commercial fishery on the LOF into one 

of three categories under the MMPA 

based upon the level of serious injury 

and mortality of marine mammals that 

occurs incidental to each fishery. The 

categorization of a fishery in the LOF 

determines whether participants in that 

fishery are subject to certain provisions 

of the MMPA, such as registration, 

observer coverage, and take reduction 

plan requirements.

DATES: Comments must be received by 

January 3, 2005.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by 

any of the following methods:

• Mail: Chief, Marine Mammal 

Conservation Division, Attn: List of 

Fisheries, Office of Protected Resources, 

NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver 

Spring, MD 20910.

• E-mail: 

2005LOF.comments@noaa.gov.

• Federal eRulemaking portal: http://

www.regulations.gov (follow 

instructions for submitting comments).

Comments regarding the burden-hour 

estimates, or any other aspect of the 

collection of information requirements 

contained in this proposed rule, should 

be submitted in writing to the Chief, 

Marine Mammal Conservation Division, 

Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 

1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, 

MD 20910 and to David Rostker, OMB, 

by e-mail at 

DavidlRostker@omb.eop.gov or by fax 

to 202–395–7285.

Registration information, materials, 

and marine mammal reporting forms 

may be obtained from the following 

regional offices:

NMFS, Northeast Region, One 

Blackburn Drive, Gloucester, MA 

01930–2298, Attn: Marcia Hobbs;

NMFS, Southeast Region, 9721 

Executive Center Drive North, St. 

Petersburg, FL 33702, Attn: Teletha 

Griffin;

NMFS, Southwest Region, Protected 

Species Management Division, 501 W. 

Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach, 

CA 90802–4213, Attn: Don Peterson;

NMFS, Northwest Region, 7600 Sand 

Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98115, Attn: 

Permits Office;

NMFS, Alaska Region, Protected 

Resources, P.O. Box 22668, 709 West 9th

Street, Juneau, AK 99802; or

NMFS, Pacific Islands Region, 

Protected Resources Division, 1601 

Kapiolani Boulevard, Suite 1110, 

Honolulu, HI 96814–4700.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kristy Long, Office of Protected 

Resources, 301–713–1401; David 

Gouveia, Northeast Region, 978–281–

9328; Juan Levesque, Southeast Region, 

727–570–5312; Cathy Campbell, 

Southwest Region, 562–980–4060; Brent 

Norberg, Northwest Region, 206–526–

6733; Bridget Mansfield, Alaska Region, 

907–586–7642; Tamra Faris, Pacific 

Islands Region, 808–973–2937. 

Individuals who use a 

telecommunications device for the 

hearing impaired may call the Federal 

Information Relay Service at 1–800–

877–8339 between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. 

Eastern time, Monday through Friday, 

excluding Federal holidays.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: