alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                             CERTIFICATION OF CFO
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Madison River Capital,
LLC (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Paul H.
Sunu, as Managing Director, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Paul H. Sunu
------------------------------------------------------

Name:   Paul H. Sunu
Title:  Managing Director, Chief Financial Officer
        and Secretary
Date:   March 30, 2004





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 351 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 351

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to waive the requirement 
  for proof of citizenship during the first year of life for children 
        born in the United States to a Medicaid-eligible mother.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 19, 2011

 Mr. Serrano introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to waive the requirement 
  for proof of citizenship during the first year of life for children 
        born in the United States to a Medicaid-eligible mother.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicaid Newborn Coverage Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. WAIVER OF REQUIREMENT OF PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP DURING FIRST YEAR 
              OF LIFE FOR CHILDREN BORN IN THE UNITED STATES TO A 
              MEDICAID-ELIGIBLE MOTHER.

    (a) In General.--Section 1903(x)(2) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 
1396b(x)(2)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (D) and (E) as 
        subparagraphs (E) and (F), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after subparagraph (C) the following new 
        subparagraph:
            ``(D) and is a child born to a woman eligible for and 
        receiving medical assistance under this title on the date of 
        the child's birth, without regard to the child's basis of 
        eligibility for medical assistance, but only with respect to 
        medical assistance for items and services furnished during the 
        child's first year of life;''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and section 
1903(x)(2)(D) of the Social Security Act, as inserted by subsection 
(a)(2), shall apply to children born on or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
No: III-13-017 May 14, 2013

CONTACT: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663

NRC Schedules Open House May 22 to Discuss 

Performance of Dresden Nuclear Power Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a public open house on May 22 to discuss the 

agency’s annual assessment of safety performance for the Dresden nuclear power plant. The two-unit 

plant is operated by Exelon Generation Co., and is located in Morris, Ill., approximately 25 miles 

southwest of Joliet.

The open house is scheduled for 6-7:30 p.m. at the Grundy County Administration Building, 

Grundy County Board Room, 1320 Union St., in Morris. Attendees will have an opportunity to hold 

one-on-one discussions with NRC staff members about the plant’s 2012 performance and the agency’s 

oversight of the facility. 

“When the NRC evaluates Dresden’s performance for the previous year, we take a look at any 

and all issues that might be of concern,” said Region III Administrator Charles Casto. “Then we map out 

our inspection plans for that specific facility, issue inspection reports, and hold public meetings near the 

plant in order to discuss our oversight and answer questions from local residents.”

The NRC review concluded that the Dresden facility operated safely in 2012. All performance 

indicators and inspection findings for the facility were green or of very low risk and would not cause the 

NRC to increase its oversight. As a result, Dresden will continue to receive the NRC’s normal level of 

oversight during 2013.

Inspections are performed by two NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant, inspection 

specialists from the Region III office in Lisle, Ill., and specialists from the agency’s headquarters in 

Rockville, Md. Among the areas of performance to be inspected this year by NRC inspectors are 

activities associated with radiological safety, equipment designs, and emergency preparedness.

The annual assessment letter sent from the NRC Region III office to Exelon addresses the 

performance of the plant during 2012 and is available on the NRC website.

The most current performance information for Dresden Unit 2 and Unit 3 is available on the 

NRC website.
Appendix C - Inventory Summary - NRC FY 2015

Page 1 of 2 -

Obligations

% Total 

Obligations

Fixed 

Price Cost T&M/LH Other Competed Not Competed

Not Available 

for Comp. blank Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

AZ11

R&D- OTHER RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (BASIC 

RESEARCH) $2,825,499.00 1.7% 4.5% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.1% 48.7% 0.0% 0.0% 23.4% 16.6% 35.4% 19.5%

Biggest Percentage of Obligations

D399 IT AND TELECOM- OTHER IT AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS $120,907,610.06 71.6% 68.2% 0.0% 21.9% 0.0% 99.2% 0.0% 0.8% 0.0% 11.4% 12.9% 44.0% 29.7%

R425 SUPPORT - PROFESSIONAL: ENGINEERING/TECHNICAL $11,657,725.57 6.9% 7.0% 61.0% 18.2% 0.0% 91.2% 6.7% 2.0% 0.0% 6.0% 14.2% 44.9% 33.8%

R499 SUPPORT- PROFESSIONAL: OTHER $10,405,967.09 6.2% 28.1% 51.7% 6.7% 0.0% 41.9% 48.1% 10.0% 0.0% 9.2% 22.7% 43.4% 21.8%

Z2AA REPAIR OR ALTERATION OF OFFICE BUILDINGS $4,046,951.83 2.4% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 11.8% 12.4% 75.8%

R699 SUPPORT- ADMINISTRATIVE: OTHER $5,907,275.08 3.5% 31.2% 0.0% 68.8% 0.0% 21.1% 1.0% 77.9% 0.0% 25.6% 16.6% 50.4% 15.3%

B519 SPECIAL STUDIES/ANALYSIS- GEOTECHNICAL $4,350,980.00 2.6% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 15.4% 10.8% 54.4% 15.9%

M111 OPERATION OF OFFICE BUILDINGS $3,235,000.00 1.9% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.2% 11.6% 8.5% 0.0%

R710 SUPPORT- MANAGEMENT: FINANCIAL $2,956,791.63 1.8% 89.2% 0.0% 13.2% 0.0% 96.1% 3.9% 3.9% 0.0% 0.0% 4.9% 86.7% 8.5%

D319

IT AND TELECOM- ANNUAL SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE SERVICE 

PLANS $2,897,975.92 1.7% 66.3% 0.0% 33.7% 0.0% 98.5% 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% 6.7% 27.3% 6.3% 48.6%

Special Interest Functions

Contract Type Analysis

(as % of PSC Obligations)

Competition Analysis

(as a % of PSC Obligations)

Time of Obligation Analysis

(as % of PSC Obligations)
Appendix C: Inventory Summary - NRC FY 2015

Page 2 of 2 -

Obligations

% Total 

Obligations Small Business SDB

8(a) 

Program VOSB SDVOSB HUBZone WOSB

AZ11

R&D- OTHER RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (BASIC 

RESEARCH) $2,825,499.00 1.7% 15.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Biggest Percentage of Obligations

D399 IT AND TELECOM- OTHER IT AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS $120,907,610.06 71.6% 9.8% 1.7% 3.9% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 3.4%

R425 SUPPORT - PROFESSIONAL: ENGINEERING/TECHNICAL $11,657,725.57 6.9% 75.9% 0.0% 15.2% 3.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.6%

R499 SUPPORT- PROFESSIONAL: OTHER $10,405,967.09 6.2% 17.7% 13.0% 13.3% 2.4% 1.9% 0.4% 2.8%

Z2AA REPAIR OR ALTERATION OF OFFICE BUILDINGS $4,046,951.83 2.4% 100.0% 85.5% 85.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

R699 SUPPORT- ADMINISTRATIVE: OTHER $5,907,275.08 3.5% 93.0% 22.8% 85.5% 15.3% 5.9% 5.8% 8.3%

B519 SPECIAL STUDIES/ANALYSIS- GEOTECHNICAL $4,350,980.00 2.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

M111 OPERATION OF OFFICE BUILDINGS $3,235,000.00 1.9% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

R710 SUPPORT- MANAGEMENT: FINANCIAL $2,956,791.63 1.8% 89.2% 3.9% 3.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

D319

IT AND TELECOM- ANNUAL SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE SERVICE 

PLANS $2,897,975.92 1.7% 36.8% 6.3% 10.8% 7.7% 7.7% 6.3% 0.0%

Special Interest Functions

Small Business Analysis

(as a % of PSC Obligations)
#### Rudolph Weiss, Doing Business as Beverly Pharmacy, Appellant, v. Mayflower Doughnut Corp. et al., Respondents.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Cohn, Breitel, Bastow and Rabin, JJ.
#### § 1203.9 Test headforms.

The headforms used for testing shall be selected from sizes A, E, J, M, and O, as defined by DRAFT ISO/DIS 6220-1983, in accordance with § 1203.10. Headforms used for impact testing shall be rigid and be constructed of low-resonance K-1A magnesium alloy.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3557 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3557

To require the country of origin of certain special immigrant religious 
workers to extend reciprocal immigration treatment to nationals of the 
                             United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 2, 2011

 Mr. King of Iowa (for himself, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. Ross of Florida, and 
  Mr. Coble) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the country of origin of certain special immigrant religious 
workers to extend reciprocal immigration treatment to nationals of the 
                             United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Religious Worker Visa Reciprocity 
Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. REQUIRING RECIPROCAL IMMIGRATION TREATMENT.

    Section 204(a)(1)(G) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1154(a)(1)(G)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(iii) Beginning on October 1, 2012, no petition may be approved 
for classification of an alien as a special immigrant under section 
101(a)(27)(C) if the Secretary of Homeland Security has determined that 
the country of the alien's nationality--
            ``(I) is identified as a `Country of Particular Concern' or 
        a country where religious freedom is of significant interest in 
        the 2010 International Religious Freedom Report; or
            ``(II) does not extend reciprocal immigration treatment to 
        nationals of the United States who are seeking resident status 
        in order to work in a religious vocation or occupation.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 224 (Monday, November 22, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 67942]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25838]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Builders Hardware Manufacturers Association, 
Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 20, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Builders Hardware 
Manufacturers Association, Inc. (``BHMA'') has filed written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of 
business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature 
and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications 
were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting 
the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: Builders 
Hardware Manufacturers Association, Inc., New York, NY. The nature and 
scope of BHMA's standards development activities are: Developing and 
maintaining the ANSI/BHMA A156 series of standards covering builders 
hardware products including architectural door trim, auxiliary 
hardware, cabinet hardware, door controls, exit devices, hinges, 
locking devices, power operated doors, and sliding and folding door 
hardware.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-25838 Filed 11-19-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
§ 1051.11 Denial of petitions. ( a ) If the Commission denies a petition it shall promptly notify the petitioner in writing of its reasons for such denial as required by the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 555(e).
( b ) If the Commission denies a petition, the petitioner (or another party) can refile the petition if the party can demonstrate that new or changed circumstances or additional information justify reconsideration by the Commission.
( c ) A Commission denial of a petition shall not preclude the Commission from continuing to consider matters raised in the petition.
#### Paul Blume, Appellant, v A & R Fuels, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[821 NYS2d 132]

*812In an action to recover damages for tortious interference with contractual relations, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), dated October 29, 2004, as granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the amended complaint, and (2) an order of the same court dated April 26, 2005, as denied that branch of his motion which was for leave to renew that branch of the defendants’ prior motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the amended complaint.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

Accepting the factual allegations in the amended complaint as true and according the plaintiff the benefit of every favorable inference, as we must on a motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) *(see Leon v Martinez,*84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]; *Gem Servs. of N.Y., Inc. v United Gen. Tit. Ins. Co.,*28 AD3d 516 [2006]; *Morales v Copy Right, Inc.,*28 AD3d 440 [2006], *lv denied*7 NY3d 705 [2006]; *Hartman v Morganstern,*28 AD3d 423 [2006]), we agree with the Supreme Court that the amended complaint failed to state a cause of action to recover damages for tortious interference with contractual relations. An essential element of this cause of action is the existence of a valid contract between the plaintiff and a third party *(see Lama Holding Co. v Smith Barney,*88 NY2d 413, 424 [1996]; *Kronos, Inc. v AVX Corp.,*81 NY2d 90, 94 [1993]; *Bradbury v Cope-Schwarz,*20 AD3d 657 [2005]; *Waste Servs. v Jamaica Ash & Rubbish Removal Co.,*262 AD2d 401 [1999]). Here, the factual allegations set forth in the amended complaint were insufficient to demonstrate that after the plaintiff left the employ of the defendant company, he entered into a valid employment contract with another company.

Furthermore, the Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for leave to renew. The plaintiff did not offer a reasonable justification for his failure to submit the newly proffered evidence at the time of the original motion, and did not demonstrate that the new evidence would have changed the prior determination *(see*CPLR 2221 [e] [2]); *Elder v Elder,*21 AD3d 1055 [2005]; *Renna v Gullo,*19 AD3d 472 [2005]). Prudenti, P.J., Mastro, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ, concur.
No: II-16-028 May 3, 2016

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416

NRC Schedules Open House to Discuss 2015 Performance at Harris Nuclear Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled an open house for Monday, May 9, to 

discuss the agency’s assessment of the Harris nuclear plant during 2015. 

The plant, operated by Duke Energy, is located near New Hill, N.C., about 20 miles southwest 

of Raleigh.

The open house, which will include informational posters, is scheduled from 4 - 5 p.m. at the 

Holly Springs Cultural Center, 300 West Ballentine Street in Holly Springs.

NRC resident inspectors and other staff members will be available to answer questions on the 

safety performance and regulatory oversight of the Harris plant, as well as highlights of NRC 

inspections. 

“We invite the public to visit with us and find out what we’re doing to ensure Harris and other 

nuclear plants are operated safely,” said NRC Region II Administrator Cathy Haney. “These annual 

meetings offer an opportunity for everyone, and especially people who live near the plant, to learn 

about our inspection and oversight programs.”

The NRC’s annual assessment letter to plant officials addressing 2015 Harris plant performance 

will serve as the main focus of the open house, but NRC staff members will be available to answer 

other questions about the NRC’s role at the plant. 

The NRC review of the Harris plant for 2015 concluded that plant operations preserved public 

health and safety and protected the environment. Because of that performance, it will continue to 

receive the detailed routine or baseline inspections this year that all nuclear power plants receive.

The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess plant 

performance. The colors start with green, which has very low safety significance, and then progress to 

white, yellow or red, based on the significance of the issues. All inspection findings and performance 

indicators for Harris were green in 2015. 

Current performance information for the Harris plant, as well as more detailed information 

about NRC inspection and oversight, is available at www.nrc.gov. Specific plant performance 

indicators and inspection reports are updated at least quarterly.
No: I-13-039 November 19, 2013

CONTACT: Diane Screnci 610-337-5330

 Neil Sheehan 610-337-5331

New NRC Resident Inspector Assigned 

to Peach Bottom Nuclear Power Plant 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia, Pa., have 

selected Brian Smith as the new Resident Inspector at the Peach Bottom nuclear 

power plant. He joins Senior Resident Inspector Sam Hansell at the two-unit site 

in Delta, Pa.

Most recently, Smith was a resident inspector at the Pilgrim nuclear 

power plant in Plymouth, Mass. He joined the NRC in 2004 and completed the 

NRC’s Nuclear Safety Professional Development Program, a two-year training 

program that provides specialized training and a broad perspective of NRC 

activities. He then worked as an engineer in the Performance Assessment Branch 

in the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation at NRC headquarters in Rockville, Md. Smith earned master’s 

and bachelor’s degrees in mechanical engineering from Penn State.

“Brian Smith has the training and commitment to safety that will help the NRC carry out its 

mission of protecting people and the environment, and he will help ensure the safe operations of the Peach 

Bottom units,” said NRC Region I Administrator Bill Dean. 

Each U.S. commercial nuclear plant site has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They serve as 

the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major work projects and 

interacting with plant workers and the public.

The Peach Bottom resident inspectors can be reached at 717-456-7614.
#### Congregation Yetev Lev D’Satmar, Inc. et al., Respondents, v 26 Adar N.B. Corp. et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

[818 NYS2d 778]

In an action pursuant to RPAPL article 15 to compel the determination of a claim to real property, the defendants 26 Adar N.B. Corp. and Nachman Brach appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schack, J.), dated April 19, 2005, which denied their motion to place the action on the trial calendar or, in the alternative, to transfer the action to Justice Theodore T. Jones, and thereupon vacated the note of issue and certificate of readiness.

Ordered that so much of the order as vacated the note of issue and certificate of readiness is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from the remainder of the order is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiffs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in vacating the note of issue and certificate of readiness to permit further discovery.

The remaining portions of the order appealed from do not affect a substantial right and are not otherwise appealable as of right, and leave to appeal has not been granted *(see*CPLR 5701 [a] [2] [v]; [c]; *Matter of Coastal Oil N.Y. v Newton,*231 AD2d 55, 57 [1997]). Prudenti, P.J., Santucci, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ., concur.
| **IT Transformation Costs by Segment Narrative (Details) (USD $)In Millions, unless otherwise specified** | 12 Months Ended |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|
||
| Total expected costs of the program                                                                       | $ 37            |
| Total costs of the program incurred in 2010                                                               | $ 36            |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Total costs of the IT Transformation program incurred in 2010
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**cna_TotalCostsOfProgramIncurredIn2010**Namespace Prefix:**cna_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**debit**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Total expected costs of the IT Transformation program
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**cna_TotalExpectedCostsOfProgram**Namespace Prefix:**cna_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**debit**Period Type:**duration |