alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1.110 Application of Government-wide administrative claims collections standards and adoption of administrative offset regulations. ( a ) The Commission shall apply the Federal Claims Collection Standards (FCCS), 31 CFR parts 900-904, in the administrative collection, offset, compromise, suspension, termination, and referral of collection activity for civil claims for money, funds, or property, as defined by 31 U.S.C. 3701(b), unless specific Federal agency statutes or regulations apply to such activities or, as provided for by Title 11 of the United States Code, when the claims involve bankruptcy. The Commission shall also follow Department of Treasury regulations set forth at 31 CFR part 285, as applicable, for administrative debt collection, including centralized offset of federal payments to collect non-tax debts that may be owed to the Commission, 31 CFR 285.5. Nothing in this subpart shall be construed to supersede or require the Commission to provide additional notice or other procedures that may have already been provided or afforded to a debtor in the course of administrative or judicial litigation or otherwise.
( b ) For purposes of 31 U.S.C. 3716(b)(1), the Commission adopts without change the regulations on collection by administrative offset set forth at 31 CFR 901.3 and other relevant sections of the FCCS applicable to such offset.
EXHIBIT 32.1


Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer


of CNA Financial Corporation


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350


(As adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of CNA Financial Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:


• the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the year ended June 30, 2024 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


• the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:July 29, 2024By/s/ Dino E. RobustoDino E. RobustoChief Executive Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
### §14111. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 14111 was editorially reclassified as section 12571 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
### §13771. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 13771 was editorially reclassified as section 12141 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
§ 304.5 Marking requirements for imitation political items. ( a ) An imitation political item which is manufactured in the United States, or imported into the United States for introduction into or distribution in commerce, shall be plainly and permanently marked with the calendar year in which such item was manufactured.
( b ) The calendar year shall be marked upon the item legibly, conspicuously and nondeceptively, and in accordance with the further requirements of these regulations. ( 1 ) The calendar year shall appear in arabic numerals, shall be based upon the Gregorian calendar and shall consist of four digits.
( 2 ) The calendar year shall be marked on either the obverse or the reverse surface of the item. It shall not be marked on the edge of the item.
( 3 ) An imitation political item of incusable material shall be incused with the calendar year in sans-serif numerals. Each numeral shall have a vertical dimension of not less than two millimeters (2.0 mm) and a minimum depth of three-tenths of one millimeter (0.3 mm) or one-half (1 ⁄ 2) the thickness of the reproduction, whichever is the lesser. The minimum total horizontal dimension for the four numerals composing the calendar year shall be six millimeters (6.0 mm).
( 4 ) An imitation political button, poster, literature, sticker, or advertisement composed of nonincusable material shall be imprinted with the calendar year in sans-serif numerals. Each numeral shall have a vertical dimension of not less than two millimeters (2.0 mm). The minimum total horizontal dimension of the four numerals composing the calendar year shall be six millimeters (6.0 mm).
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D2023-2159

LT Case No. 2021-100149-CFDL

_____________________________

MICHAEL HARRIS, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County.

Elizabeth A. Blackburn, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Victoria Rose Cordero, 

Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard A. 

Pallas, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for 

Appellee.

June 4, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, SOUD, and PRATT, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
###    USDA Animal andPlant Health Inspection Service

----

**National Poultry Improvement PlanSearch Directory by StateStateClassTypeInput the 2 letter abbreviation for the state:HatcheriesIndependent FlocksDealersEgg Type ChickensMeat Type ChickensTurkeysWaterfowl, Exibition Poultry, and Game BirdsOstrich
Search Directory by Product*(Note: This query may take up to 30 seconds or more...)*StateClassTypeInput the 2 letter abbreviation for the state:HatcheriesIndependent FlocksDealersEgg Type ChickensMeat Type ChickensTurkeysWaterfowl, Exibition Poultry, and Game BirdsOstrichProduct Code: Index of codes.NPIP Home Page 
**
### §12620. Status of Corps members and Corps personnel under Federal law

#### (a) In general

Except as otherwise provided in this section, members of the National Civilian Community Corps shall not, by reason of their status as such members, be considered Federal employees or be subject to the provisions of law relating to Federal employment.

#### (b) Work-related injuries

#### (1) In general

For purposes of subchapter I of chapter 81 of title 5 relating to the compensation of Federal employees for work injuries, members of the Corps shall be considered as employees of the United States within the meaning of the term "employee", as defined in section 8101 of such title.

#### (2) Special rule

In the application of the provisions of subchapter I of chapter 81 of title 5 to a person referred to in paragraph (1), the person shall not be considered to be in the performance of duty while absent from the person's assigned post of duty unless the absence is authorized in accordance with procedures prescribed by the Director.

#### (c) Tort claims procedure

A member of the Corps shall be considered an employee of the United States for purposes of chapter 171 of title 28 relating to tort claims liability and procedure.

(Pub. L. 101–610, title I, §160, formerly §195I, as added Pub. L. 102–484, div. A, title X, §1092(a)(1), Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2530; renumbered §160, Pub. L. 103–82, title I, §104(b), Sept. 21, 1993, 107 Stat. 840; amended Pub. L. 111–13, title I, §1510, Apr. 21, 2009, 123 Stat. 1526.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 12653i of this title prior to renumbering by Pub. L. 103–82, §104(b).

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 160 of Pub. L. 101–610 was classified to section 12611 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–82, §104(a).

#### Amendments

2009—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 111–13 inserted "National" before "Civilian Community Corps".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2009 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–13 effective Oct. 1, 2009, see section 6101(a) of Pub. L. 111–13, set out as a note under section 4950 of this title.
### §13744. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 103–322, title III, §30104, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1838, which authorized apropriations for fiscal years 1995 to 2000, was omitted as obsolete.
No: 15-006 February 2, 2015

CONTACT: Holly Harrington, 301-415-8200 

NRC Proposes FY 2016 Budget to Congress; 

NRC Spending, Staffing Declining

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has requested $1,032.2 million (including the Office of 

the Inspector General) in its Fiscal Year 2016 budget proposal to Congress, down $27.3 million from 

the FY 2015 submission. Requested staffing is down as well for the agency that regulates nuclear 

power plants and users of nuclear materials to protect public health and safety, promote the common 

defense and security and protect the environment.

“This budget reflects today’s realities and ushers in a new era in enhancing accountability 

within the NRC for the prudent use of resources,” said NRC Chairman Stephen G. Burns. 

Since the NRC recovers approximately 90 percent of its budget from licensee fees, which are

sent directly to the Treasury, the resulting net appropriation request is $122.2 million, down $2 million 

from last year’s submission. The continuing resolution adopted by Congress Dec. 16, 2014, cut the 

NRC request by $44.2 million to account for fee-based unobligated carryover and authorized the 

agency to reallocate its unobligated carryover to supplement its FY 2015 appropriations.

The budget reflects a decrease of 140.8 full-time equivalent (FTE) employees from the FY 2015

budget. The FY 2016 budget funds 3,741 FTEs, including the Office of the Inspector General. The 

decrease is due to reduction in New Reactors and Fuel Facilities staffing due to decreasing workload, 

and efficiencies realized in the merger of two program offices.

The FY 2016 budget breakout includes $793.4 million for nuclear reactor safety and $226.7

million for nuclear materials and waste. The budget also includes resources to continue lessons-learned 

activities related to the Fukushima nuclear accident, including seismic and flooding reevaluations.

The budget request for the Inspector General is $12.1 million. That office independently and 

objectively conducts audits and investigations to ensure the efficiency and integrity of NRC programs, 

and promote cost-effective management. The OIG’s budget also includes funding to provide Inspector 

General services for the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.

The budget briefing slides and the Congressional Budget Justification are available on the NRC 

website at http://nrcweb.nrc.gov:400/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1100/v31/.

A limited number of hard copies of the report will be available from opa.resource@nrc.gov.
### SUBCHAPTER II—ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR NEW BUILDINGS
### §14044b. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 14044b was editorially reclassified as section 20703 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
#### In the Matter of Matthew Pante, Petitioner, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[820 NYS2d 819]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which directed that petitioner be placed in administrative segregation.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination placing him in administrative segregation. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and that all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see *Matter of Johnson v Goord,*283 AD2d 707, 708 [2001]).

Crew III, J.P., Carpinello, Mugglin, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
No: II-16-024 April 18, 2016 

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416 

NRC Schedules Webinar to Discuss Safety Performance of AREVA Richland 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a webinar with management of 

AREVA NP Inc., in Richland, Wash., on Tuesday, April 26, to discuss the results of a regulatory safety 

performance review of the company’s commercial nuclear fuel fabrication plant. 

The webinar will be held from 2-3 p.m. EDT (11 a.m.-noon PDT) with NRC officials 

participating from the agency’s regional offices in Atlanta and AREVA officials at the facility in 

Richland. The webinar can be accessed by the public and the media, and NRC officials will be 

available after the formal presentation to answer questions. 

The NRC staff assessed performance of AREVA Richland during the period beginning Jan. 1, 

2014 and ending Dec. 31, 2015, in safety operations, radiological controls, facility support and other 

areas. The NRC staff review determined that AREVA continued to conduct its activities safely and 

securely, protecting public health and the environment. 

The review found that none of the program areas needed improvement, which means the NRC 

will continue its normal inspection program for such facilities. 

“The NRC inspects AREVA and other nuclear fuel facilities on a continuous basis to monitor 

their safety performance,” said NRC Region II Administrator Cathy Haney. “We post our inspection 

reports online and we also hold regular meetings, or in this case a webinar, to discuss our oversight and 

answer questions from members of the public.” 

A copy of the NRC letter to the company regarding the performance review is publicly 

available on the NRC website. 

For information on how to access the webinar, please contact the NRC’s Tom Vukovinsky at 

404-997-4622 or via email at Thomas.Vukovinsky@nrc.gov.
No: 16-038 June 30, 2016

Contact: Maureen Conley, 301-415-8200

NRC Publishes Annual Report to Congress on Nuclear Security Inspections

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has made available to the public an unclassified version of 

its annual report to Congress detailing the previous year’s security inspection program. The report is 

required under the Energy Policy Act of 2005.

The report covers the NRC’s security inspection program, including force-on-force exercises, 

for commercial nuclear power reactors and Category I fuel cycle facilities for calendar year 2015.

“The report provides information regarding the overall security and safeguards performance of 

the commercial nuclear power industry and Category I fuel cycle facilities to keep Congress informed 

of the NRC’s efforts to oversee the protection of the nation’s civilian nuclear power infrastructure and 

strategic special nuclear material against terrorist attacks,” NRC Chairman Stephen G. Burns said.

In 2015, the NRC conducted 242 security inspections at commercial nuclear power plants and 

Category I fuel cycle facilities. Those included 22 force-on-force inspections, involving simulated 

attacks on the facilities to test the effectiveness of a licensee’s security. The NRC’s security program 

and publicly available results of the inspections are discussed in the report.

Whenever NRC inspectors identify a security finding during an inspection, they ensure the 

licensee implements appropriate compensatory measures to correct the situation. Details of security 

findings are considered sensitive and not released to the public.
I,:!] r.LT 3 I /.:"UNmD STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC

TRAVEL GROUP, INC., D/B/A REPUBLIC AIR TRAVEL

AND SCOT SPENCER

AIRLIFT GROUP, INC.

AND RICHARD BERNARD

Unauthorized Air Transportation,

Unfair and Deceptive Practices and Unfair Methods of

Competition, and Violations of Public Charter Rule.f

EXPRESS ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Unfair and Deceptive Practices and Unfair Methods of

Competition, and Violations of Public Charter Rules

Enforcement Proceeding

STATUS REPORT

DOT-OST-I995-272

formerly Docket 49233

The Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and

Proceedings ("Enforcement Office"), pursuant to Your Honor's March 22,2006, Order

staying this proceeding, files this report detailing the current status of this proceeding and

settlement negotiations.

The Department has not ruled on the outstanding motions filed by Respondents

and opposed by the Enforcement Office in Ascend Aviation Group, Docket OST -2004-

17486.
'/ 2

There have been no further settlement discussions.

Date: October 31, 2013

Respectfully submitted,

~ Qelici::y~

Assistant General Counsel for

Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings

Vinh Q. Nguyen

Senior Trial Attorney

United States Department of Transportation

Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Room 96-429

Washington, D.C. 20590

TEL: 202-366-9342

FAX: 202-366-7152
,

,r 3

Docket No. DOT-OST-1995-272

I hereby certify that on this 31st day of October, 2013, a true and correct copy of the

foregoing Status Report was served in the following manner to the following:

Original

u.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Operations, M-30

West Building Ground Floor

Room W12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

By First Class Mail

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder

Chief Administrative Law Judge

Office of Hearings, M-20

U.S. Department of Transportation

Washington, D.C. 20590

TEL: (202) 366-2142

FAX: (202) 366-7536

By First Class Mail

Scot Spencer

SBD Aircraft Services

255 S Leland Norton Way

Sam Bernardino, CA 92408

Scot Spencer

22604 Esplanada Circle

Boca Raton, Florida 33433
#### Marshall Stedman, Appellee, v. Chicago Musical College, Appellant.

Gen. No. 21,414.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. John Gibbons, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the March term, 1915.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed January 3, 1916.

Statement of the Case.

Action by Marshall Stedman, plaintiff, against Chicago Musical College, a corporation, defendant. From a judgment for plaintiff for $5,831.50, defendant appeals.

Error charged by defendant was the action of the trial court in permitting plaintiff to file an amended declaration and an amended affidavit of claim after defendant had filed a plea of the general issue and after the same were filed striking out defendant’s plea, ordering that the default of defendant be entered and entering judgment against it for $5,831.50. The order giving-plaintiff leave to file an amended declaration and an amended affidavit of claim was entered November 2, 1914. The amended declaration and amended affidavit of claim were filed the same day. The order provided that defendant’s “plea now on file shall stand to said amended declaration, to which latter plaintiff objects and excepts.” November 25th defendant’s plea was stricken out, its default taken and judgment entered against defendant. The bill of *357exceptions showed that defendant by its counsel objected to plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend, but its objection was overruled and defendant excepted; that defendant also excepted to the judgment and prayed an appeal, which was allowed on defendant filing a bond, etc. The record showed no motion of defendant for leave to file an affidavit of merits.

Abstract of the Decision.

1. Pleading, § *248*
      ***
      *—when allowance of amendment in power of court.*The court may permit plaintiff, over defendant’s objection, to file an amended declaration and amended affidavit of claim after defendant has filed a plea of the general issue.

2. Judgment, § *106*
      ***
      *-—when entry of default proper.*Where plaintiff, by leave of court, files an amended declaration and amended affidavit of merits and defendant’s plea is stricken and no amended affidavit of merits is filed, judgment by default is properly entered for plaintiff.

J. E. Ingram, for appellant; Herman Frank and G. W. Killelea, of counsel.

John A. McKeown, for appellee.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice Baker

delivered the opinion of the court.
§ 1115.15 Confidentiality and disclosure of data. ( a ) *General.* The Commission does not routinely make reports available to the public until the staff has made a preliminary hazard determination. Copies of reports will not be available to the public in the Commission's public reading room, and information contained in reports will not ordinarily be disclosed to the public in the absence of a formal request.
( b ) *Freedom of Information Act.* Any person who submits information to the Commission who believes that any portion of the information is entitled to exemption from public disclosure under the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act, as amended (15 U.S.C. 552(b)), of the CPSA, as amended, or of another Federal statute must accompany the submission with a written request that the information be considered exempt from disclosure or indicate that a written request will be submitted within 10 working days of the submission. The request shall ( 1 ) identify the portions of the information for which exemption is claimed, which may include the identity of the reporting firm and the fact that it is making a report, and
( 2 ) state the facts and reasons which support the claimed exemption. After the staff has made its preliminary hazard determination, and regardless of whether or not the staff preliminarily determines that a product presents a substantial product hazard, the Commission will no longer honor requests for exempt status for the identity of the reporting firm, the identity of the consumer product, and the nature of the reported alleged defect or noncompliance. This information, together with the staff's preliminary hazard determination, will be made available to the public in the Commission's public reading room. Information for which exempt status is claimed (such as alleged trade secrets, confidential commercial or financial information, or information the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy) shall not be released to the public except in accordance with the applicable statute or the Commission's Freedom of Information Act regulations (16 CFR part 1015).
( c ) *Section 6(b) of the CPSA.* The Commission believes that the first two sentences in section 6(b)(1) of the CPSA (15 U.S.C. 2055(b)(1)) apply to affirmative dissemination of information by the Commission (such as press releases or fact sheets distributed to the public) from which the public may ascertain readily the identity of the product's manufacturer and/or private labeler. Manufacturers and private labelers will ordinarily be given 30 days' notice before the Commission makes such affirmative disseminations. However, this 30-day notice will not apply if the Commission finds that a lesser notice period is required in the interest of public health and safety.