alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance



 





Exhibit 10.1




FOURTH AMENDMENT

TO THE SECURITIES PURCHASE AGREEMENT




This amendment (“Amendment”) is made and entered into as of June 18, 2007 (“Effective Date”) by and
between Specialty Risk Solutions, LLC (“SRS”) and Specialty Underwriters’ Alliance, Inc., and
amends the SECURITIES PURCHASE AGREEMENT(“Agreement”) entered into by the parties on May 11, 2005,
as amended. Any terms defined in the Agreement and used herein shall have the same meaning in this
Amendment as in the Agreement. In the event that any provision of this Amendment and any provision
of the Agreement are inconsistent or conflicting, the inconsistent or conflicting provision of this
Amendment shall be and constitute an amendment of the Agreement and shall control, but only to the
extent that such provision is inconsistent or conflicting with the Agreement. Any capitalized
terms not defined herein shall be defined as in the Agreement.



NOW, THEREFORE, and in consideration of the mutual agreements and covenants set forth, the parties
wish to amend the Agreement as follows:



The following provision of Subsection (iii) of (c) of Section 1: Sale and Purchase of
Securities; Closing shall be deleted in its entirety:




“on the second anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement, a balloon payment for
the remaining unpaid balance of the $1,000,000”;



and shall be replaced with the following:




“on December 31, 2008, a balloon payment for the remaining unpaid balance of the
$1,000,000.”



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed on their behalf by
their duly authorized officers as of the day, month and year above written.



SPECIALTY UNDERWRITERS’ ALLIANCE, INC.




	 	 	 	 	 
	By: 

Name:

	 	/s/ William S. Loder
 

William S. Loder
	 	 
	Title:

	 	Senior Vice President and	 	 
	 

	 	Chief Underwriting Officer	 	 






SPECIALTY RISK SOLUTIONS, LLC




	 	 	 	 	 
	By: 

Name:

	 	/s/ Scott H. Keller
 

Scott H. Keller
	 	 
	Title:

	 	Managing Director
EXHIBIT
10.39.1


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE


EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF WASHINGTON, INC.


AMENDED 1993 DIRECTORS’
NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION PLAN


This
amendment, effective as of May 3, 2006 (this “Amendment”), amends the
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. Amended 1993 Directors’
Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”). 
Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall
have the respective meanings set forth in the Plan.


The Plan is hereby amended as set forth below:


1.                                       Amendment
of Section 4(d).  The Plan is hereby
amended by amending and restating Section 4(d) as follows:


“(d)                           Vesting Schedule.


Each Option will
vest ratably over twelve months as follows. 
On the first day of the month beginning after the Date of Grant, the
Option will become vested with respect to 8.3% of the Option; and thereafter,
on the first day of each succeeding month for the next ten months, the Option
will become vested with respect to an additional 8.3% of the Option.  On the first day of the twelfth month
beginning after the Date of Grant, the Option will become vested with respect
to the remaining 8.7% of the Option.”


2.                                       Remaining
Terms.  Except as modified hereby,
the terms of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
§ 310.7 Actions by states and private persons. ( a ) Any attorney general or other officer of a State authorized by the State to bring an action under the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act, and any private person who brings an action under that Act, must serve written notice of its action on the Commission, if feasible, prior to its initiating an action under this part. The notice must be sent to the Office of the Director, Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC 20580, at *tsrnotice@ftc.gov* and must include a copy of the State's or private person's complaint and any other pleadings to be filed with the court. If prior notice is not feasible, the State or private person must serve the Commission with the required notice immediately upon instituting its action.
( b ) Nothing contained in this Section shall prohibit any attorney general or other authorized state official from proceeding in state court on the basis of an alleged violation of any civil or criminal statute of such state.
[75 FR 48516, Aug. 10, 2010, as amended at 89 FR 26785, Apr. 16, 2024]
#### In the Matter of James Lewis, Petitioner, v Israel Rivera, as Superintendent of Coxsackie Correctional Facility, Respondent.

[821 NYS2d 678]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Greene County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Following an incident in the mess hall during which petitioner purportedly became irate and belligerent toward a correction officer, he was charged in a misbehavior report with creating a disturbance and refusing a direct order. At the ensuing tier II *1121disciplinary hearing, petitioner requested to view a videotape of the incident to establish that he did not engage in the offensive conduct. The Hearing Officer denied the request and proceeded to find petitioner guilty of the charges. After the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

Petitioner argues that his due process rights were violated by the Hearing Officer’s denial of his request to view the videotape. Based upon our review of the record, we agree. It is evident from the transcript of the disciplinary proceeding that the Hearing Officer did not view the videotape himself or consider it as evidence in support of his determination *(compare Matter of Marquez v Mann,*192 AD2d 100 [1993]; *Matter of Hillard v Coughlin,*187 AD2d 136 [1993], *lv denied*82 NY2d 651 [1993]). Nevertheless, the Hearing Officer concluded that the tape would not depict the mannerisms or body language of the parties involved in the exchange and that, consequently, it was irrelevant to the charges against petitioner. This conclusion is not supported by the record and, insofar as the videotape may have had a significant bearing on petitioner’s defense, the Hearing Officer should have allowed petitioner to examine it *(see Matter of Taylor v Coughlin,*190 AD2d 900, 902 [1993], *lv denied*82 NY2d 651 [1993]). Consequently, the matter must be remitted for a new hearing *(see Matter of Garcia v Coughlin,*194 AD2d 896, 897 [1993]).

Cardona, P.J., Spain, Carpinello, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is annulled, without costs, and matter remitted to respondent for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court’s decision.
§ 1112.45 What are the grounds for suspension of CPSC acceptance? ( a ) The CPSC may suspend its acceptance of a third party conformity assessment body's accreditation for any portion of its scope when the third party conformity assessment body fails to cooperate with an investigation under section 14 of the CPSA. A third party conformity assessment body “fails to cooperate” when it does not respond to CPSC inquiries or requests, or it responds in a manner that is unresponsive, evasive, deceptive, or substantially incomplete, or when it fails to cooperate with an investigatory inspection under § 1112.27.
( b ) Suspension lasts until the third party conformity assessment body complies, to the satisfaction of the CPSC, with required actions, as outlined in the notice described in § 1112.51(b), or until the CPSC withdraws its acceptance of the third party conformity assessment body.
( c ) If the CPSC determines that the third party conformity assessment body is cooperating sufficiently with the CPSC's investigation, the CPSC will lift the suspension. The suspension will lift as of the date of the CPSC's written notification to the third party conformity assessment body that the CPSC is lifting the suspension. The written notification may be by electronic mail.
§ 1502.36 Official transcript. ( a ) The presiding officer will arrange for a verbatim stenographic transcript of oral testimony and for necessary copies of the transcript.
( b ) One copy of the transcript will be placed on public display in the Office of the Secretary upon receipt.
( c ) Copies of the transcript may be obtained by application to the official reporter and payment of costs thereof.
( d ) Witnesses, participants, and counsel have 30 days from the time the transcript becomes available to propose corrections in the transcript of oral testimony. Corrections are permitted only for transcription errors. The presiding officer shall promptly order justified corrections.
§ 1018.3 Policy. In application of this part, Commission officials shall be guided by the Advisory Committee Act, the statutes creating the Commission's advisory committees, and by the directives in Executive Order No. 11769 and OMB Circular No. A-63. Principles to be followed include: ( a ) Limiting the number of advisory committees to those that are essential and terminating any committee not fulfilling its purpose;
( b ) Insuring effective use of advisory committees and their recommendations, while assuring that decisional authority is retained by the responsible Commission officers;
( c ) Providing clear goals, standards, and uniform procedures with respect to the establishment, operation, and administration of advisory committees;
( d ) Ensuring that adequate information is provided to the public regarding advisory committees; and
( e ) Ensuring adequate opportunities for access by the public to advisory committee meetings and information.
§ 1209.31 Purpose and applicability. ( a ) *Purpose.* The purpose of this subpart B of part 1209 is to establish requirements that manufacturers, importers, and private labelers must follow to certify that their products comply with the Amended Interim Standard for Cellulose Insulation (16 CFR part 1209, subpart A). This subpart B includes requirements for conducting a reasonable testing program, certifying with labels and separate certificates, and recordkeeping.
( b ) *Applicability.* ( 1 ) Cellulose insulation which is subject to the standard includes all cellulose insulation, manufactured after the effective date (as described in § 1209.41), produced or distributed for sale to, or for the personal use, consumption, or enjoyment of, consumers in or around a permanent or temporary household or residence, a school, in recreation or otherwise. The standard applies to cellulose insulation that is produced or distributed for sale to consumers, for their direct installation or use, as well as cellulose insulation that is produced or distributed for installation by professionals.
( 2 ) The term *cellulose insulation* is defined in § 1209.2(a) of the standard to mean cellulosic fiber, loose fill, thermal insulation that is suitable for blowing or pouring applications.
exv10w1



 





Exhibit 10.1




CARRIAGE SERVICES, INC.




Amendment No. 1

To

2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan

(Effective January      , 2007)




     THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 (this “Amendment”) to the 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), of
CARRIAGE SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), originally adopted effective May
25, 2006;



     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company has approved an amendment to the Plan to
provide that the “Fair Market Value” as defined thereunder shall be based upon the closing price
(rather than the average of the highest and lowest selling prices) of a share of the Company’s
Common Stock;



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended as follows:



     1. Defined Terms. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the
meanings given such terms in the Plan.



     2. Amendment. Section 2.15 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety so that, as
amended, said Section 2.15 shall read as follows:




     “2.15 ‘Fair Market Value’ means (a) for so long as the Common Stock is listed
on the New York Stock Exchange or any other national stock exchange, the closing
price for such stock as quoted on such exchange for the date the Award is granted
(or if there are no sales for such date of grant, then for the last preceding
business day on which there were sales), (b) if the Common Stock is traded in the
over-the-counter market, the closing price as reported by NASDAQ for the date the
Award is granted (or if there was no quoted price for such date of grant, then for
the last preceding business day on which there was a quoted price), or (c) if the
Common Stock is not reported or quoted by any such organization, fair market value
of the Common Stock as determined in good faith by the Committee using a “reasonable
application of a reasonable valuation method” within the meaning Section 409A of the
Code and the regulations thereunder. Notwithstanding the foregoing, “Fair Market
Value” with respect to an Incentive Stock Option shall mean fair market value as
determined in good faith by the Committee within the meaning of Section 422 of the
Code.”



     3. Nature of Amendment. In accordance with Section 13.1 of the Plan, the Board has
determined that this Amendment shall not require approval of the shareholders of the Company and
therefore this Amendment shall become effective as of the date that the Board has approved
this Amendment, as shown below.



 









 





     4. Ratification. As amended hereby, the Plan in hereby ratified and confirmed.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed on behalf of the Company by authority of
the Board as of January      , 2007.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	CARRIAGE SERVICES INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Melvin C. Payne
 	 
	 	 	MELVIN C. PAYNE, Chairman and 	 
	 	 	Chief Executive Officer 	 
	 




-2-
#### § 680.2 Examples.

The examples in this part are not exclusive. Compliance with an example, to the extent applicable, constitutes compliance with this part. Examples in a paragraph illustrate only the issue described in the paragraph and do not illustrate any other issue that may arise in this part.
No. I-13-032 September 16, 2013 

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331

NRC Staff to Meet With Firstenergy on Sept. 24 in Coraopolis, Pa.

to Discuss Performance of Company’s Nuclear Power Plants

Nuclear Regulatory Commission and FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co. (FENOC) senior 

managers will meet on Sept. 24 to discuss topics related to the performance of the company’s fleet of 

nuclear power plants. FENOC operates the Beaver Valley plant, in Shippingport, Pa.; the Davis-Besse 

plant, near Oak Harbor, Ohio; and the Perry plant, in Perry, Ohio.

The meeting is scheduled to begin at 8:30 a.m. at the Embassy Suites-Pittsburgh Airport hotel, 

located at 550 Cherrington Parkway in Coraopolis, Pa. During the session, which is open to the public, 

FENOC will provide updates on activities and issues involving its plants.

“We have interactions with the companies that operate U.S. nuclear power plants throughout 

the year, but this type of meeting allows for a briefing on a broad range of topics in a single setting, 

with key agency managers in attendance,” NRC Region I Administrator Bill Dean said. “We welcome 

this opportunity to engage FENOC on the latest developments at its three sites.”

This will be what is known as a Category 1 meeting. That is, it will be a session with one 

company to discuss particular regulatory issues regarding specific facilities. Following the business 

portion of the meeting, members of the public will have an opportunity to discuss FENOC plant 

performance topics and the role of the agency in ensuring safe plant operation with NRC staff.

The agenda for the meeting is available on the NRC’s website.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 222 (Thursday, November 18, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 67544]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25675]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, December 3, 2004.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean A. Webb, (202) 418-5100.

Catherine D. Daniels,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 04-25675 Filed 11-16-04; 10:29 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
### §13505. Integration of research and development

Within 180 days after October 24, 1992, the Secretary, in consultation with appropriate representatives of industry, institutions of higher education, Department of Energy national laboratories, and professional and technical societies, shall prepare and submit to Congress a 5-year program plan for improving the integration of basic energy research programs with other energy programs within the Department of Energy. Such program plan shall include—

(1) an evaluation of current procedures and mechanisms used to achieve such integration;

(2) an assessment of the role that the Department of Energy national laboratories play in such integration;

(3) an identification and evaluation of models that could enhance such integration;

(4) an identification and evaluation of new programs, mechanisms, and related policy options that could improve the integrating process, including—

(A) set aside funding for matching or leveraging basic and applied programs;

(B) more formal linkages; and

(C) program coordination;

(5) recommendations for expanded research and development and new technology areas; and

(6) budget estimates for activities under this section.

(Pub. L. 102–486, title XXII, §2205, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3091.)
#### § 1404.2 Background.

Based on available fire incident information, engineering analysis of the probable fire scenarios, and laboratory tests, the Consumer Product Safety Commission has determined that fires can occur where cellulose insulation is improperly installed too close to the sides or over the top of recessed electrical light fixtures, or installed too close to the exhaust flues from heat producing devices or apparatus such as furnaces, water heaters, and space heaters. These fires may result in serious injuries or deaths. Presently available information indicates that fires may occur where cellulose insulation is improperly installed even though the cellulose insulation complies with the Commission's amended interim standard for cellulose insulation (16 CFR part 1209) based on GSA Specification HH-I-515D. The Commission has determined that it is necessary to require labeling to inform persons installing cellulose insulation and consumers in whose homes the insulation is installed of the fire hazard associated with improperly installed cellulose insulation and the method of properly installing the insulation to prevent this hazard. The Commission anticipates that this regulation will accomplish the purpose of helping protect the public against the unreasonable risk of injury associated with improperly installed cellulose insulation.
#### § 1019.8 Confidentiality.

If the exporter believes any of the information submitted should be considered trade secret or confidential commercial or financial information, the exporter must request confidential treatment, in writing, at the time the information is submitted or must indicate that a request will be made within 10 working days. The Commission's regulations under the Freedom of Information Act, 16 CFR part 1015, govern confidential treatment of information submitted to the Commission.
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 10 ,

2014

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 13

- 00798

- CV

CHAD R. SEABOLD, M.D ., D.D.S , Appellant

V.

PHILLIP T. IERO, M.D ., D.D.S. AND PHILLIP T. IERO, M.D ., D.D.S., P.A. NB , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 125th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2010

- 76846

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
This is an appeal from a judgment signed June 3, 2013 . On May 30, 2014, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted.
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Donovan and Brown.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3574 

To revise the formula for allocating funding to States under the Low-Income 

Home Energy Assistance Act of 1981. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 6, 2011 

Mr. REED (for himself, Mr. GIBSON, Mr. HIGGINS, Mr. HANNA, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mr. KING of New York, Mr. GRIMM, Mr. HINCHEY, Ms. BUERKLE, 

Mr. TONKO, Mr. OWENS, Ms. HOCHUL, Mr. ENGEL, and Mr. ALTMIRE) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Education and 

the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To revise the formula for allocating funding to States under 

the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Act of 1981. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIHEAP STATE ALLOCATION FORMULA. 

4 Section 2604(a)(2) of the Low-Income Home Energy 

5 Assistance Act of 1981 (42 U.S.C. 8623(a)(2)) is amend6 ed to read as follows: 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3574 IH

1 ‘‘(2) For purposes of paragraph (1), a State’s allot2 ment percentage is the percentage which that State would 

3 have received under this section as enacted in Public Law 

4 97–35.’’. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 30, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 69616]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26363]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Library of Medicine; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Library of Medicine Special Emphasis 
Panel, R03 Telephone SEP.
    Date: December 10, 2004.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 1:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Library of Medicine, Division of Extramural 
Programs, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 301, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Hua-Chuan Sim, MD, Health Science Administrator, 
National Library of Medicine, Extramural Programs, Bethesda, MD 
20892.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.879, 
Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 22, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-26363 Filed 11-29-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M