alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3.36 Applications for subpoenas for records of or appearances by certain officials or employees of the Commission or officials or employees of governmental agencies other than the Commission, and subpoenas to be served in a foreign country. ( a ) *Form.* An application for issuance of a subpoena for the production of documents, as defined in § 3.34(b), or for the issuance of a request requiring the production of or access to documents, other tangible things, or electronically stored information for the purposes described in § 3.37(a), in the possession, custody, or control of the Commissioners, the General Counsel, any Bureau or Office not involved in the matter, the office of Administrative Law Judges, or the Secretary in his or her capacity as custodian or recorder of any such information, or their respective staffs, or of a governmental agency other than the Commission or the officials or employees of such other agency, or for the issuance of a subpoena requiring the appearance of a Commissioner, the General Counsel, an official of any Bureau or Office not involved in the matter, an Administrative Law Judge, or the Secretary in his or her capacity as custodian or recorder of any such information, or their respective staffs, or of an official or employee of another governmental agency, or for the issuance of a subpoena to be served in a foreign country, shall be made in the form of a written motion filed in accordance with the provisions of § 3.22(a). No application for records pursuant to § 4.11 of this chapter or the Freedom of Information Act may be filed with the Administrative Law Judge.
( b ) *Content.* The motion shall make a showing that: ( 1 ) The material sought is reasonable in scope;
( 2 ) If for purposes of discovery, the material falls within the limits of discovery under § 3.31(c)(1), or, if for an adjudicative hearing, the material is reasonably relevant;
( 3 ) If for purposes of discovery, the information or material sought cannot reasonably be obtained by other means or, if for purposes of compelling a witness to appear at the evidentiary hearing, the movant has a compelling need for the testimony;
( 4 ) With respect to subpoenas to be served in a foreign country, that the party seeking discovery or testimony has a good faith belief that the discovery requested would be permitted by treaty, law, custom, or practice in the country from which the discovery or testimony is sought and that any additional procedural requirements have been or will be met before the subpoena is served; and
( 5 ) If the subpoena requires access to documents or other tangible things, it meets the requirements of § 3.37.
( c ) *Execution.* If an Administrative Law Judge issues an order authorizing a subpoena pursuant to this section, the moving party may forward to the Secretary a request for the authorized subpoena, with a copy of the authorizing order attached. Each such subpoena shall be signed by the Secretary; shall have attached to it a copy of the authorizing order; and shall be served by the moving party only in conjunction with a copy of the authorizing order.
[74 FR 1828, Jan. 13, 2009]
IN RESPONSE, PLEASE 

 REFER TO: M150806A 

August 6, 2015 

MEMORANDUM FOR: Brooke P. Clark, Director 

Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication 

FROM: Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS - AFFIRMATION SESSION, 9:25 A.M., 

THURSDAY, AUGUST 6, 2015, COMMISSIONERS' 

CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH, 

ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND (OPEN TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE) 

I. SECY-15-0091 – Crow Butte Resources, Inc. (License Renewal for the in situ Leach 

Facility, Crawford, Nebraska), Petitions for Review of LBP-15-2 and LBP-15-11 

The Commission1

 approved a Memorandum and Order responding to three petitions for review: 

the Oglala Sioux Tribe’s petition for interlocutory review of the Atomic Safety and Licensing 

Board’s decision denying a stay of effectiveness of the renewed license (LBP-15-2), Crow Butte 

Resources, Inc.’s petition for interlocutory review of the Board’s decision on new and amended 

contentions based on the Environmental Assessment (LBP-15-11), and the NRC Staff’s petition 

for interlocutory review of LBP-15-11. The Memorandum and Order denies all three petitions for 

review. 

(Subsequently, on August 6, 2015, the Secretary signed the Memorandum and Order.) 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 EDO 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA 

 OIG 

 OPA 

 Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR 

 

1

 Chairman Burns did not participate in this matter.
§ 1119.3 Definitions. For purposes of this rule, the following definitions apply: ( a ) *Product defect* means a defect as referenced in the CPSA and defined in Commission regulations at 16 CFR 1115.4.
( b ) *Violation* means a violation committed knowingly, as the term “knowingly” is defined in section 19 of the CPSA, section 4 of the FHSA, or section 5 of the FFA.
( c ) *Person* means any manufacturer (including importer), distributor, or retailer, as those terms are defined in the CPSA, FHSA, or FFA, and any other legally responsible party.
### **CHAPTER 40—SOIL INFORMATION ASSISTANCE FOR COMMUNITY PLANNING AND RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT**

Sec.
3271.
Availability of soil surveys under soil survey program.
3272.
Cooperative assistance to State and other public agencies; types of assistance; private engineering services.
3273.
Contributions of State or other public agencies toward cost of soil surveys.
3274.
Authorization of appropriations.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 244

To amend the Clean Air Act to permit the exclusive application of California 

State regulations regarding reformulated gas in certain areas within 

the State. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2003

Mr. ISSA (for himself, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Mr. OSE, Mr. MATSUI, 

Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Ms. LEE, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. MCKEON, 

Mr. SCHIFF, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD, Mr. 

ROYCE, Mr. LEWIS of California, Mr. CALVERT, Mrs. DAVIS of California, Mr. HUNTER, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. HERGER, Mr. DOOLITTLE, 

Mr. POMBO, Mr. RADANOVICH, Mr. THOMAS, Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. 

DREIER, Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California, Mrs. BONO, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. COX, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr. NUNES, Mrs. CAPPS, Mr. 

HONDA, Mrs. TAUSCHER, Mr. DOOLEY of California, Mr. BECERRA, Ms. 

LOFGREN, Mr. CARDOZA, Ms. WATSON, Mr. LANTOS, Mr. FARR, Mr. 

SHERMAN, Mr. BACA, and Mr. BERMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL

To amend the Clean Air Act to permit the exclusive application of California State regulations regarding reformulated gas in certain areas within the State.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 244 IH 

1 SECTION 1. CALIFORNIA REFORMULATED GAS RULES. 

2 Section 211(c)(4)(B) of the Clean Air Act is amended 

3 by adding the following at the end thereof: ‘‘Whenever any 

4 such State that has received a waiver under section 

5 209(b)(1) has promulgated reformulated gasoline rules for 

6 any covered area of such State (as defined in subsection 

7 (k)), such rules shall apply in such area in lieu of the re8 quirements of subsection (k) if such State rules will 

9 achieve equivalent or greater emission reductions than 

10 would result from the application of the requirements of 

11 subsection (k) in the case of the aggregate mass of emis12 sions of toxic air pollutants and in the case of the aggre13 gate mass of emissions of ozone-forming compounds.’’.

Æ
1

Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 8:15 AM

To: 'andydees@aerovueimagery.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov'

Subject: Request for Additional Information: AeroVue Imagery, LLC (FAA-2015-0961)

August 27, 2015 

Dear Mr. Dees: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-0961). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your 

petition. 

 Describe the aircraft makes, models, and types (i.e., fixed-wing, rotorcraft, lighter-than-air) for the 

proposed UAS operation. The descriptions should include the maximum weight (including 

payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manuals. 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit 

any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If 

you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by September 

10, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999.
#### BUMP v. NELSON et al.

Finding on conflicting evidence will not be disturbed on appeal, where there is no clear preponderance against them.

(Opinion filed October 3, 1911.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Moody County; Hon. -J. W. , Jones, Judge.

Action by Alice Bump against L. L. Nelson and others. Erom a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

Affirmed.

*Coleman & Blewitt*and *Robertson & Dougherty,*for appelants.

*Rice & Benson,*for respondent.

HANEY, J.

This action involves a controversy concerning the line between the N. E. of section io, and the S. E. *J/i*of section 3, township 106, range 50, Moody ouunty. The plaintiff, who owns the N. E. of section 10, contends the line is in the center of -the highway as now traveled, between two rows of large trees. The defendant Nelson, who owns the S. E. of section 3, contends the line at its east end is about eight rods, and at its west end is about three rods, south of the center of the highway as now traveled. The other defendants do not appear to have answered. The real issue is whether the northeast corner of section 10, being also the southeast corner of section 3, was located by the original government surveyor' at a point which is in the center of the highway as now traveled. The learned circuit court found that the United States government surveyor, • in' making the original survey, marked the said corner “with a mound and four pits, and placed a stake in said mound, and that the corner marked as aforesaid was located in the center of the traveled highway running east and west” between the said sections, and “that said line was then and is now the true boundary line between the two said described tracts of land.” Judgment having been accordingly entered, and defendant Nelson’s application for a new trial refused, this appeal was taken.

The only assignment of error argued by appellant is the alleged insufficiency of the evidence to justify the decision. The evidence is voluminous and conflicting. After consideration of the *41entire record, this court is unable to conclude that there is a clear preponderance against the findings of the trial court. So its judgment must be affirmed.
Company Name Utelite Site Name Shale Processing Company ID - 499 Site ID - 10676

**2006 SO x**  **Tons/y ear**  1b **58.408** 1a **0.001** 3b **57.549** 3a **0.002** 2b **58.536** 2a **0.001** 174.497 16-19 & 21 **0.949** 175.446 **OXIDES OF SULFUR A NNUA** **L EMISSION REPORT**

**Point Source ID Description of Process**  **Emission Factor Method How sulfur content was calculated**  This form is to be used by sources that have emitted 100 tons or more of SO x in any calendar year after 1999, and that are **not subject** to acid rain continuous monitoring reporting requirements (40CFR Part 75).

Kiln #1, coal **AP -42, Section 1.1**  **From sulfur and heat content** Kiln #1, natural gas **AP -42, Section 1.4**  **AP-42 Estimate** Kiln #4, coal **AP -42, Section 1.1**  **From sulfur and heat content** Kiln #4, natural gas **AP -42, Section 1.4**  **AP-42 Estimate**

Exhaust Emissions **AP -42, Volume II**  **AP-42 Estimate** Kiln #3, coal **AP -42, Section 1.1**  **From sulfur and heat content** Kiln #3, natural gas **AP -42, Section 1.4**  **AP-42 Estimate** SUBTOTAL

TOTAL
### §13315. Data system and energy technology evaluation

The Secretary of Commerce, in his or her role as a member of the interagency working group established under section 6276 of this title, shall—

(1) develop a comprehensive data base and information dissemination system, using the National Trade Data Bank and the Commercial Information Management System of the Department of Commerce, that will provide information on the specific energy technology needs of foreign countries, and the technical and economic competitiveness of various renewable energy and energy efficiency products and technologies;

(2) make such information available to industry, Federal and multilateral lending agencies, nongovernmental organizations, host-country and donor-agency officials, and such others as the Secretary of Commerce considers necessary; and

(3) prepare and transmit to the Congress not later than June 1, 1993, and biennially thereafter, a comprehensive report evaluating the full range of energy and environmental technologies necessary to meet the energy needs of foreign countries, including—

(A) information on the specific energy needs of foreign countries;

(B) an inventory of United States technologies and services to meet those needs;

(C) an update on the status of ongoing bilateral and multilateral programs which promote United States exports of renewable energy and energy efficiency products and technologies; and

(D) an evaluation of current programs (and recommendations for future programs) that develop and promote energy efficiency and sustainable use of indigenous renewable energy resources in foreign countries to reduce the generation of greenhouse gases.

(Pub. L. 102–486, title XII, §1209, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2964.)
### §13842. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 13842 was editorially reclassified as section 12202 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
# L_2022246EN.01006201.xml

| 22.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 246/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 246/62

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 120/2022

of 29 April 2022

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2022/1564]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/525 of 19 October 2020 amending Annexes II and III to Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/525 of 19 October 2020 amending Annexes II and III to Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 12n (Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘- | 32021 R 0525: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/525 of 19 October 2020 (OJ L 106, 26.3.2021, p. 3).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘-

32021 R 0525: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/525 of 19 October 2020 (OJ L 106, 26.3.2021, p. 3).’

Article 2

The text of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/525 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 30 April 2022, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 29 April 2022.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Nicolas VON LINGEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 106, 26.3.2021, p. 3.

1

(*)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*

---
Legend

Natural Resource Areas

Large Block

Medium Block

General Forest

Wildlife Refuge

Wetlands

Administration

Communications

Developed Recreation

Environmental Education

Turkey Bay OHV

Utility Corridor

Subcategories to RX Areas

Research Natural Area

State Natural Area

Administrative Areas

Environmental Education &

Developed Recreation Areas

Deferred Old Growth

Deferred Cut

Ecological Study Areas

Prepared by US Forest Service, Land Between The Lakes

GIS Laboratory, September 2004

Source scales vary, and accuracy of the final land cover has not been assessed. 

Lakes are associated with facilities. Honker and Energy Lakes are also wildlife 

refuges. All Research Natural Areas and State Natural Areas lie within the Core 

areas. Core acreages are based on GIS data, not previously published. Closed 

facilities under administrative areas include Duncan Wildlife Restoration Area, 

Empire Farm, Youth Station, Lookout Tower, and Silo Overlook.

Disclaimer

Alternative Land Prescription Areas

NATIONAL RECREATION AREA

Between Lakes The

NORTH

W

Other Features

Road Level

Water

1

2

3

4

5

 ̄

012

Miles
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

I, Ted T.H. Jeong, Chief Financial Officer of Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter
         ended March 31, 2005 as filed on the date hereof with the Securities
         and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934, as amended; and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Date: May 23, 2005


/s/ Ted T.H. Jeong
-------------------------
Ted T.H. Jeong
Chief Financial Officer
#### Jacob Zahler v. Saul W. Mann and Another.

Application granted. Order signed. Present — Clarke, P. J., Scott, Smith, Page and Davis, JJ.
§ 970.501 Proposal to issue or transfer and of terms, conditions and restrictions. ( a ) *Notice and comment.* The Administrator will publish in the Federal Register notice of each proposal to issue or transfer, and of terms and conditions for, and restrictions on, an exploration license. Subject to 15 CFR 971.802, interested persons will be permitted to examine the materials relevant to such proposals. Interested persons will have at least 60 days after publication of such notice to submit written comments to the Administrator.
( b ) *Hearings.* ( 1 ) The Administrator will hold a public hearing in an appropriate location and may employ such additional methods as he deems appropriate to inform interested persons about each proposal and to invite their comments thereon.
( 2 ) If the Administrator determines there exists one or more specific and material factual issues which require resolution by formal processes, at least one formal hearing will be held in the District of Columbia metropolitan area in accordance with the provisions of subpart I of 15 CFR part 971. The record developed in any such formal hearing will be part of the basis for the Administrator's decisions on issuance or transfer of, and of terms, conditions and restrictions for the license.
( c ) Hearings held pursuant to this section will be consolidated insofar as
practicable with hearings held by other agencies. [46 FR 45903, Sept. 15, 1981, as amended at 54 FR 548, Jan. 6, 1989]
§ 1025.25 Summary decisions and orders. ( a ) *Motion.* Any party may file a motion, with a supporting memorandum, for a Summary Decision and Order in its favor upon all or any of the issues in controversy. Complaint Counsel may file such a motion at any time after thirty (30) days following issuance of a complaint, and any other party may file a motion at any time after issuance of a complaint. Any such motion by any party shall be filed at least twenty (20) days before the date fixed for the adjudicative hearing.
( b ) *Response to motion.* Any other party may, within twenty (20) days after service of the motion, file a response with a supporting memorandum.
( c ) *Grounds.* A Summary Decision and Order shall be granted if the pleadings and any depositions, answers to interrogatories, admissions, or affidavits show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a Summary Decision and Order as a matter of law.
( d ) *Legal effect.* A Summary Decision and Order upon all the issues being adjudicated shall constitute the Initial Decision of the Presiding Officer and may be appealed to the Commission in accordance with § 1025.53 of these rules. A Summary Decision, interlocutory in character, may be rendered on fewer than all issues and may not be appealed prior to issuance of the Initial Decision.
( e ) *Case not fully adjudicated on motion.* A Summary Decision and order that does not dispose of all issues shall include a statement of those material facts about which there is no substantial controversy and of those material facts that are actually and in good faith controverted. The Summary Order shall direct such further proceedings as are appropriate.
From: Belone, Stan

To: Flagg, MichaelA

Cc: christopher.horan@srpmic-nsn.gov

Subject: Exceptional Event Letter July 2011

Date: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 11:15:27 AM

Attachments: Draft-Exceptional Events jul2011 letter.pdf

Michael,

Attached is the drafted Exceptional Event Letter 2011 for your review. In the letter, I did not clarify

the potential affect for July 2, 2011 that initially was coded for “NS” Influenced by nearby source

and other code was “IL” Other, but the value remain at 216 ug/m3 now in AQS. This was

agricultural activities I was trying to coded and the wind may have carried on towards the

monitoring site.

Thanks,

Stan Belone, Environmental Engineer

Air Quality Program

Environmental Protection & Natural Resources

Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community

10005 East Osborn Road

Scottsdale, AZ 85256

480-362-7626

stan.belone@srpmic-nsn.gov
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# Transmittal of Research Information Letter RIL-1101, "Technical Basis to Review Hazard Analysis of Digital Safety Systems."

Accession Number: ML14237A342

Date Released: Friday, February 13, 2015

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML14237A358 - Transmittal of Research Information Letter RIL-1101, "Technical Basis to Review Hazard Analysis of Digital Safety Systems" (Memo). (2 page(s), 2/13/2015)
    - ML14237A359 - Transmittal of Research Information Letter RIL-1101, "Technical Basis to Review Hazard Analysis of Digital Safety Systems" (Enclosure). (157 page(s), 2/13/2015)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer