alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1.87 NEPA and agency decisionmaking. In its final decision on the proposed action or, if appropriate, in its recommendation to Congress, the Commission shall consider all the alternatives in the environmental impact statement and other relevant environmental documents and shall prepare a concise statement which, in accordance with CEQ Regulation § 1505.2, shall: ( a ) Identify all alternatives considered by the Commission in reaching its decision or recommendation, specifying the alternatives which were considered to be environmentally preferable;
( b ) State whether all practicable means to avoid or minimize environmental harm from the alternative selected have been adopted, and if not, why they were not.
### §11363. Protection of personally identifying information by victim service providers

In the course of awarding grants or implementing programs under this subchapter, the Secretary shall instruct any victim service provider that is a recipient or subgrantee not to disclose for purposes of the Homeless Management Information System any personally identifying information about any client. The Secretary may, after public notice and comment, require or ask such recipients and subgrantees to disclose for purposes of the Homeless Management Information System non-personally identifying information that has been de-identified, encrypted, or otherwise encoded. Nothing in this section shall be construed to supersede any provision of any Federal, State, or local law that provides greater protection than this subsection for victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking.

(Pub. L. 100–77, title IV, §407, as added Pub. L. 111–22, div. B, title I, §1104, May 20, 2009, 123 Stat. 1677.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1104 of Pub. L. 111–22, which directed amendment of subtitle A of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act by adding this section at the end, was executed by adding this section at the end of subtitle A of title IV of Pub. L. 100–77 (this part), to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the earlier of 18 months after May 20, 2009, or 3 months after publication of certain final regulations by Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, see section 1503 of Pub. L. 111–22, set out as an Effective Date of 2009 Amendment note under section 11302 of this title.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Karl Patrick Houlditch, Appellant

No. 06

- 14

- 00207

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 71st District Court of Harrison County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 13

- 0263X ). Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Moseley and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Karl Patrick Houlditch, has adequately indicated his inability

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED OCTOBER 30 , 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### § 1061.6 Contents of applications for exemption.

Applications for exemption shall include the information specified in §§ 1061.7 through 1061.10. More generally, a State or local government seeking an exemption should provide the Commission with the most complete information possible in support of the findings the Commission is required to make in issuing an exemption regulation. If any of the specified information is omitted because it is unavailable or not relevent, such omission should be explained in the application.
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2014-0038 Directorate ID: 2013-SW-023-AD

Helicopter Model: Airbus Helicopters (formerly Eurocopter France) Model EC225LP

Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 4 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to prevent loss of the blade strip, excessive 

vibrations induced by blade weight imbalance, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $600 to repair a blade

$315,495 to replace a P/N 332A11-0050-01 blade

$403,650 to replace a P/N 332A11-0055-00 blade

Labor per Helicopter

(4 work-hours x $85/workhour for the inspection, 4 

work hours to repair a blade, 

5 work hours to replace a 

blade)

$340 to inspect a helicopter

$340 to repair a helicopter

$425 to replace a blade

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $940 to repair a helicopter

$315,920 to replace a P/N 332A11-0050-01 blade

$404,075 to replace a P/N 332A11-0055-00 blade

Total US Fleet Cost $$1,360 to inspect the fleet

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Gary Roach
one more thing

Bamber, Amy t
o
: Jordan Page 01/27/2010 01:01 PM

Hi Jordan

I was just looking through the data I sent you and realized I have one more clarification to make-- y ou will see a couple of big numbers for carbaryl and azinphos methyl (maybe some others too) that have the site ID that starts with GFC. T his is cherry rinsate from a hydrocoole r --NOT surface water results! Sorry for having those in there, I should have taken them out first so it was'nt confusing. My apologies.

Amy Bamber Montana Department of Agriculture 303 N. Roberts Helena, MT 59620-0201 406-444-3676 abamber @ mt.gov
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D
. C
. 20460

John V. Massingale Greenwich Chemica l Consu lting, Inc 3300 PGA Boulevard, Suite 635 Palm Beach Gardens, 

### FL 33410 

# FEB JJ .Z015 OFFICE OF THE ADMI N IST RATOR

Re : Request for extension to submit final reports fo r Log Kow and aquatic toxicity for 

### 0- erythro-hex-2-enonic acid, gamma.- lactone, monosodium salt (Sodium ervthorbate)(CASRN 6381-77-7) Dear Mr. Massingale: EPA has received your January 27,2015, letter on behalfofUnivar USA, Inc. , (Univar) requesting an extension oftime to submit final reports for acute toxicity testing fo r fish and Daphnia and for algal toxicity fo r D-gluco-heptonic acid, monosodium salt, (2.xi.)- (CASRN 6381-77-7). EPA also understands from a clarifying email that thi s request also applies to the required Log Kow determination. The required biodegradation test has recently been completed and does not require an extension for submission
. These studies were required pursuant to a test rule issued under section 4 ofthe Tox ic Substances Control Act on January 7, 2011 (76 FR 1067) (HVP2). Your letter states that Univar is requesting an extension to October 31, 2015, (instead of the original date of February 1 1, 20 15) and that the extension is required to account for the additional time needed to consult with EPA and incorporate additional EPA comments, as well as work with the testing laboratory to assure that the necessary changes are implemented. EPA also understands that add itional time is needed to develop the analytical methods and test procedures to account for the instability of the test compound. EPA notes that, although initial protocols were submitted to EPA on time, mu l tiple reviews of these protocols have been required.

I nternet Address (URL) • http://www
.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetab l e Oi l Based Inks on 100% Postco n sumer, Process Chlonne F r ee Recyc l ed PaperEPA agrees that the additional work described in your extension request will require the additional time to start and complete the required endpoint studies. Therefore, EPA is granting the requested extension to submit the final reports for the Log Kow, acute toxicity tests for fish and Daphnia, and test for algal toxicity on October 31, 2015.

If you have any questions, please contact John Schaeffer of my staff (schaeffer.john@epa.gov; 202-564-8173). cc: Docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0531

Sincerely. **p~k** Paul Lewis, Ph.D. Chief Chemicallnformation and Testing Branch (MC 7405M)
#### Village of Mamaroneck, Respondent, v. Albert Miller, Appellant.

In an action in rem to foreclose tax liens under title 3 of article VII-A of the Tax Law, order of the County Court, Westchester County, striking out answer as sham and frivolous and decreeing the same to be a nullity, and judgment therein entered dispensing with sale and directing conveyance, unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The pleading so struck out contained no denial of any allegation of the list of delinquent taxes and raised no issue thereon. It did not allege that the taxes had been paid or that the property was not subject to tax, nor did it allege any jurisdictional defect or invalidity in the tax or in the sale. A bare allegation of ownership and demand for severance does not constitute an answer within the purview of the act. Present — Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Robert Wilkins, Appellant.

Judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Queens, convicting appellant of a violation of subdivision 2 *724of section 2092 of the Penal Law (unlawful assembly) reversed on the law and the facts and information dismissed. In our opinion, the evidence was insufficient to establish appellant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Mac Crate and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 25 (Friday, February 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 5865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2612]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-53,914]


Intermetro Industries Corp., Cucamonga, CA; Notice of Termination 
of Investigation

    Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on December 31, 2003, in response to a petition filed by 
a company official on behalf of workers at InterMetro Industries 
Corporation, Cucamonga, California.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 12th day of January, 2004.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-2612 Filed 2-5-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

S.T.L.

, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D 15

- 3964

)

STATE OF FLORIDA

, )

)

Appellee

. )

)

Opinion filed July 1, 2016.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for

Hillsborough County; Manuel A. Lopez

, Judge

.

Howard L. Dimmig, II , Public Defender, and

Brooke Elvington , Assistant Public Defender,

Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi , Attorney General,

Tallahassee

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders 1 appeal, we find no error in the disposition or the sentence,

but we remand for the circuit court to correct a scrivener's error in the disposition order.

S.T.L. entered a plea of no contest to the o ffenses of possession of marijuana and

1 Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967).- 2

- possession of drug paraphernalia. The circuit court withheld adjudication and gave her

a judicial warning. However, the following three options are checked on the disposition

order : "Adjudication of delinquency is w ithheld

, " "The child is adjudicated delinquent,"

and "The child is given a Judicial Warning." The disposition order is remanded for the

circuit court to correct the scrivener's error to reflect that adjudication of delinquency

was withheld and the child w as given a judicial warning.

Affirmed; remanded to correct scrivener's error.

CASANUEVA

, SILBERMAN, and KELLY, JJ. , Concur.
### §12840. Suspension of requirements for disaster areas

For funds designated under this subchapter by a recipient to address the damage in an area for which the President has declared a disaster under title IV of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act [42 U.S.C. 5170 et seq.], the Secretary may suspend all statutory requirements for purposes of assistance under this subchapter for that area, except for those related to public notice of funding availability, nondiscrimination, fair housing, labor standards, environmental standards, and low-income housing affordability.

(Pub. L. 101–625, title II, §290, as added Pub. L. 103–233, title II, §208, Apr. 11, 1994, 108 Stat. 366.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 93–288, May 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 143. Title IV of the Act is classified generally to subchapter IV (§5170 et seq.) of chapter 68 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5121 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable with respect to any amounts made available to carry out this subchapter after Apr. 11, 1994, and any amounts made available to carry out this subchapter before that date that remain uncommitted on that date, with Secretary to issue any regulations necessary to carry out this section not later than end of 45-day period beginning on that date, see section 209 of Pub. L. 103–233, set out as an Effective Date of 1994 Amendment note under section 5301 of this title.
### SUBCHAPTER II—CONSTRUCTION OF HEALTH FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY HOSPITALS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3727 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3727

  To allow for innovations and alternative technologies that meet or 
                exceed desired energy efficiency goals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 19, 2011

 Mr. Aderholt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To allow for innovations and alternative technologies that meet or 
                exceed desired energy efficiency goals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Enabling Energy Saving Innovations 
Act''.

SEC. 2. INNOVATIVE COMPONENT TECHNOLOGIES.

    Section 342(f) of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 
6313(f)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``paragraphs (2) through 
        (5)'' and inserting ``paragraphs (2) through (6)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(6) Innovative component technologies.--Subparagraph (C) 
        of paragraph (1) shall not apply to a walk-in cooler or walk-in 
        freezer components if the manufacturer has demonstrated to the 
        satisfaction of the Secretary that the component model reduces 
        energy consumption at least as much as if such subparagraph 
        were to apply. In support of any demonstration under this 
        paragraph, a manufacturer shall provide to the Secretary all 
        data and technical information necessary to fully evaluate its 
        application.''.
                                 <all>
```
No: II-15-027 April 15, 2015

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

 Joey Ledford 404-997-4416 

NRC Schedules Public Meeting April 23 in Erwin to Discuss NFS Safety Performance

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a meeting with Nuclear Fuel Services 

in Erwin, Tenn., on April 23 to discuss the results of the company’s licensee performance review.

The meeting will be held at 6 p.m. in the Erwin Town Hall, located at 211 N. Main Ave. The 

meeting will be open to members of the public and the news media. The NRC staff will provide a brief 

presentation on the company’s performance, followed by a response from NFS. The NRC staff will 

then be available to answer questions about the agency’s oversight and inspection of the facility.

The NRC staff assessed performance at NFS during a period beginning Jan. 1, 2013, and ending 

Dec. 31, 2014, in the areas of safety operations, radiological controls, facility support and licensing. 

Those evaluations will form the basis of the meeting discussion. The NRC staff review determined that 

NFS conducted its activities safely and securely, protecting the public and the environment.

The NRC will continue conducting its detailed normal inspection program at NFS after 

concluding earlier this year that facility performance had improved to a point where increased NRC 

oversight, which began in 2004, was no longer necessary. 

“The NRC inspects NFS and other nuclear fuel facilities on an ongoing basis to monitor their 

performance,” said NRC Region II Administrator Victor McCree, “Our inspection reports are publicly 

available and we also hold regular meetings like this one near each facility to discuss our oversight and 

answer local residents’ questions.”

A copy of the NRC review is available on the NRC website.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 231 (Thursday, December 2, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70146-70147]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26553]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics: Meeting

    Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the Department of 
Health and Human Services (HHS) announces the following advisory 
committee meeting.

    Name: National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics (NCVHS), 
Subcommittee on Standards and Security (SSS).
    Time and Date:
    December 8, 2004, 9 a.m.--5:30 p.m.
    December 9, 2004, 8:30 a.m.--6 p.m.
    December 10, 2004, 8:30 a.m.--12:15 p.m.
    Place: Hubert H. Humphrey Building, 200 Independence Avenue, 
SW., Room 705A, Washington, DC 20201.
    Status: Open.
    Purpose: The Subcommittee on Standards and Security will meet on 
December 8-10. December 8 and 9 will be devoted to hearing testimony 
from various stakeholders in government and the industry about 
standards

[[Page 70147]]

and issues related to the use of e-signatures and electronic 
prescribing. The morning of the 10th will focus on updates from the 
industry workgroups on the codified SIG, formulary and benefits 
standards, and the HL7/NCPDP harmonization, which will be followed 
by Subcommittee discussion.
    For Further Information Contact: Substantive program information 
as well as summaries of meetings and a roster of Committee members 
may be obtained from Maria Friedman, Health Insurance Specialist, 
Security and Standards Group, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid 
Services, MS: C5-24-04, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 
21244-1850, telephone: (410) 786-6333 or Marjorie S. Greenberg, 
Executive Secretary, NCVHS, National Center for Health Statistics, 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Room 1100, 3311 Toledo 
Road, Hyattsville, Maryland 20782, telephone: (301) 458-4245. 
Information also is available on the NCVHS home page of the HHS Web 
site: http://www.ncvhs.hhs.gov/ where an agenda for the meeting will 
be posed when available.
    Should you require reasonable accommodation, please contract the 
CDC Office of Equal Employment Opportunity on (301) 458-4EEO (4336) 
as soon as possible.

    Dated: November 22, 2004.
James Scanlon,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Science and Data Policy, Office 
of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation.
[FR Doc. 04-26553 Filed 12-01-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4151-05-M
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Salomon Smith Barney Orion Futures Fund L.P. (the"Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the periodending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, David J. Vogel, President and Director of Citigroup Managed FuturesLLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Partnership.

/s/    DavidJ. Vogel

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

David J.VogelCitigroup Managed Futures LLC President and Director

August 9, 2005

----
Exhibit 35.1



Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services,
Inc.



This Annual Statement as to Compliance
is delivered to you pursuant to Section 2.9 (c) of the 2019-2 Servicing Supplement dated as of April 1, 2019 (the “Agreement”)
and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of GM Financial Automobile Leasing Trust 2019-2 (the
“Trust”), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery
of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and GMF Leasing LLC in connection
therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.



The undersigned certifies
that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as
follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during
the preceding period from May 8, 2019 through December 31, 2019, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations
under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any
such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.



|By: | /s/ Connie Coffey                                                                                         |  | Dated:  March 6, 2020
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|    | Connie Coffey
        Executive Vice President, Corporate
        Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |  |