alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of
ADA-ES, Inc. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ADA-ES, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael D. Durham,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Michael D. Durham
---------------------
Name: Michael D. Durham
Title: President
Date: May 9, 2006


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ADA-ES, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark H. McKinnies,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Mark H. McKinnies
---------------------
Name: Mark H. McKinnies
Title: Senior VP & CFO
Date: May 9, 2006
#### § 0.4 Laws administered.

The Commission exercises enforcement and administrative authority under the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 41-58), Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 12-27), and more than 70 other Federal statutes, which are listed at *https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/statutes.*

[86 FR 38545, July 22, 2021]
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3870 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3870

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 24, 2012

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 6083 Highway 36 West in Rose Bud, Arkansas, as the ``Nicky `Nick' 
                      Daniel Bacon Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NICKY ``NICK'' DANIEL BACON POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 6083 Highway 36 West in Rose Bud, Arkansas, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Nicky `Nick' Daniel Bacon Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Nicky 
`Nick' Daniel Bacon Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 23, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### COLE v. SCHREIER.

Where no motion for a directed verdict was made by appellant, and the action of the trial court in overruling the motion for a new trial is not assigned as error, the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict will not be reviewed.

(Opinion filed June 30, 1911.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Hyde County; Hon. Lyman T. HoucintR, Judge.

Action by A. J. Cole against Emil Schreier. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

*O'Brien &Johnson,*for appellant.

*L. B. Whitcher*and *Gardner, Bair.bank Sr Churchill,*for respondent.

McCOY, J.

In this case plaintiff in the court below, who is respondent in this court, brought suit against defendant, the appellant, to recover upon a promissory note. Defendant answered, admitting the execution and delivery of the note, and *31pleaded a failure of consideration and mistake in the execution thereof. Verdict and judgment were in fávor of plaintiff.

No motion for a directed verdict was made by appellant, neither is the action of the trial court in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial assigned as error; hence, under the former decisions of this court, the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict will not be reviewed. Certain portions of the instructions of the court were excepted to, but an inspection of the record does not show any error therein. Many objections to the reception and rejection of testimony are assigned as error, but there appears to be no merit in any of these assignments.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
§ 1501.3 Exemptions. The following articles are exempt from this regulation (§§ 1500.18(a)(9) and 1501.4 below): ( a ) Balloons;
( b ) Books and other articles made of paper;
( c ) Writing materials such as crayons, chalk, pencils, and pens;
( d ) Children's clothing and accessories, such as shoe lace holders and buttons;
( e ) Grooming, feeding, and hygiene products, such as diaper pins and clips, barrettes, toothbrushes, drinking glasses, dishes and eating utensils;
( f ) Phonograph records;
( g ) Modeling clay and similar products;
( h ) Fingerpaints, watercolors, and other paint sets;
( i ) Rattles (as defined at 16 CFR 1510.2); and
( j ) Pacifiers (as defined at 16 CFR 1511.2(a)).
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, John J. Sherman, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Inergy Holdings, L.P. (the “registrant”); 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: February 9, 2006
No: III-16-020 July 13, 2016

CONTACT: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663

NRC Proposes $3,500 Civil Penalty to 

Patriot Engineering and Environmental Inc.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has proposed a $3,500 civil penalty against Patriot 

Engineering and Environmental Inc. for the failure to control licensed radioactive material. The 

company, based in Indianapolis, Ind., uses portable nuclear gauges for measuring construction 

materials.

The violation was identified during an NRC inspection of an incident where a portable density 

gauge was run over by a vehicle and damaged. The nuclear material inside the gauge was not damaged 

and remained intact.

“Even though no one was harmed, it could have impacted the health and safety of the workers at 

the jobsite,” said NRC Region III Administrator Cynthia D. Pederson. “We expect companies to ensure 

NRC regulations are being followed to protect workers and the environment. Our actions show the 

importance we place on controlling nuclear material.” 

The event occurred at a job site in Indianapolis on March 8. Once the violation of NRC 

requirements was identified, the company took corrective actions. The NRC will conduct a follow-up 

inspection to verify the company’s actions are effective and prevent recurrence.

A copy of the Notice of Violation will be posted on the NRC’s ADAMS online database.
#### Dorota B. Olender, Appellant, v Felix A. Maldonado et al., Respondents.

[819 NYS2d 479]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rosenberg, J.), dated June 10, 2005, which granted the defendants’ motion, inter alia, to vacate an order of the same court (M. Carson, J.), dated April 30, 2004, granting the plaintiff’s motion for leave to enter a *461judgment upon the defendants’ default in appearing or answering and to vacate a judgment of the same court (M. Garson, J.), entered October 25, 2004, which, after an inquest, was in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants in the principal sum of $750,000.

Ordered that the order dated June 10, 2005, is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof granting those branches of the motion which were to vacate the order dated April 30, 2004, and to vacate so much of the judgment as was against the defendant Allstate Power Vac, Inc.; as so modified, the order dated June 10, 2005, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a hearing in accordance herewith, and thereafter, for a new determination of those branches of the motion.

The Supreme Court properly granted those branches of the defendants’ motion which were to vacate the order dated April 30, 2004, granting that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was for leave to enter a judgment upon the default of the defendant Felix Maldonado in appearing or answering, and to vacate so much of the judgment as was against that defendant. Maldonado established that he did not personally receive notice of the summons and complaint in time to defend and has a meritorious defense as to liability and damages *(see*CPLR 317).

On the other hand, there are issues of fact regarding the reasonableness of the excuse of the defendant Allstate Power Vac, Inc. (hereinafter APV), in failing to appear or answer *(see*CPLR 5015 [a] [1]), and regarding the timeliness of APV’s receipt of notice of the summons and complaint *(see*CPLR 317), for which a hearing was necessary before the Supreme Court could rule on those branches of the defendants’ motion with respect to APV *(see Schwerner v Sagonas,*28 AD3d 468 [2006]; *Verille v Kopic,*304 AD2d 823 [2003]). We therefore remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for such a hearing and a new determination of those branches of the motion. Schmidt, J.P., Crane, Krausman, Skelos and Lunn, JJ., concur.
§ 20.1 Deception generally. ( a ) It is unfair or deceptive to represent, directly or by implication, that any industry product is new or unused when such is not the fact, or to misrepresent the current condition, or extent of previous use, reconstruction, or repair of any industry product.
( b ) It is unfair or deceptive to offer for sale or sell any industry product without disclosing, clearly and conspicuously, in advertising, in promotional literature, on invoices, and on the product's packaging that the item is an industry product. Additionally, it is unfair or deceptive to offer for sale or to sell any industry product that appears new or unused without disclosing on the product itself that it is an industry product, using appropriate descriptive terms with sufficient permanency to remain visible for a reasonable time after installation. Examples of appropriate descriptive terms include, but are not limited to “Used,” “Secondhand,” “Repaired,” “Relined,” “Reconditioned,” “Rebuilt,” or “Remanufactured.” If the term “recycled” is used, it should be used in a manner consistent with the requirements for that term set forth in the Guides for the Use of Environmental Marketing Claims, 16 CFR 260.7(e). On invoices to the trade only, the disclosure may be by use of any number, mark, or other symbol that is clearly understood by industry members as meaning that the part so marked on the invoices is not new.
( c ) It is unfair or deceptive to place any means or instrumentality in the hands of others so that they may mislead consumers as to the previous use of industry products.
Exhibit 32.1



CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



The undersigned, Nelson C. Rising, the Chief
Executive Officer of Catellus Development Corporation (the Company), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, hereby certifies that:



(i) the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



Date: November 8, 2004



/S/ NELSON C. RISINGNelson C. Rising




THIS
CERTIFICATION IS FURNISHED SOLELY PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, AND IS NOT BEING FILED AS PART OF THE REPORT OR AS A SEPARATE DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT.



A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND WILL BE RETAINED BY CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.



54
### §14043h–7. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 14043h–7 was editorially reclassified as section 21308 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
<XBRL>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<!--XBRL Document Created with the Workiva Platform-->
<!--Copyright 2024 Workiva-->
<!--r:9be831b5-c949-42e9-9ec6-32864d47a585,g:c7a450f6-835e-4fb9-87cf-44dcaefdc710-->
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:link="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/linkbase" xmlns:cna="http://www.cna.com/20241021" attributeFormDefault="unqualified" elementFormDefault="qualified" targetNamespace="http://www.cna.com/20241021">
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/instance" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xbrl-instance-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/linkbase" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xbrl-linkbase-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://xbrl.sec.gov/dei/2024" schemaLocation="https://xbrl.sec.gov/dei/2024/dei-2024.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://xbrl.sec.gov/exch/2024" schemaLocation="https://xbrl.sec.gov/exch/2024/exch-2024.xsd"/>
  <xs:annotation>
    <xs:appinfo>
      <link:linkbaseRef xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:arcrole="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/properties/linkbase" xlink:href="cna-20241021_pre.xml" xlink:role="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationLinkbaseRef" xlink:type="simple"/>
      <link:linkbaseRef xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:arcrole="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/properties/linkbase" xlink:href="cna-20241021_def.xml" xlink:role="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/definitionLinkbaseRef" xlink:type="simple"/>
      <link:linkbaseRef xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:arcrole="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/properties/linkbase" xlink:href="cna-20241021_lab.xml" xlink:role="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/labelLinkbaseRef" xlink:type="simple"/>
      <link:roleType id="CoverPageCoverPage" roleURI="http://www.cna.com/role/CoverPageCoverPage">
        <link:definition>0000001 - Document - Cover Page Cover Page</link:definition>
        <link:usedOn>link:presentationLink</link:usedOn>
        <link:usedOn>link:calculationLink</link:usedOn>
        <link:usedOn>link:definitionLink</link:usedOn>
      </link:roleType>
    </xs:appinfo>
  </xs:annotation>
</xs:schema>
</XBRL>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. August Faucetta, Appellant.

Defendant appeals from an order of the County Court, Nassau County, denying, after a hearing, his application in the nature of a writ of error *coram nobis*to vacate a judgment of said court, convicting him of robbery in the first degree on his plea of guilty, on the ground that he was not advised of his right to be represented by counsel. Order affirmed. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Schmidt, Beldock and Murphy, JJ., concur.
#### §§ 19.04-19.10 [Reserved]
EPA/600/R-02/010

August 2003

Procedures for the Derivation of

Equilibrium Partitioning Sediment Benchmarks (ESBs)

for the Protection of Benthic Organisms: Dieldrin

Walter J. Berry*

Robert M. Burgess**

National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory

Atlantic Ecology Division

Narragansett, RI

David J. Hansen

HydroQual, Inc., Mahwah, NJ

Great Lakes Environmental Center, Traverse City, MI (formerly with U.S. EPA)

Dominic M. DiToro

Manhattan College, Riverdale, NY; HydroQual, Inc.,

Mahwah, NJ

Laurie D. DeRosa

HydroQual, Inc., Mahwah, NJ

Heidi E. Bell*

Mary C. Reiley

Office of Water, Washington, DC

Frank E. Stancil, Jr.

National Exposure Research Laboratory

Ecosystems Research Division

Athens, GA

Christopher S. Zarba

Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC

David R. Mount

Robert L. Spehar

National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory

Mid-Continent Ecology Division

Duluth, MN

* Principle U.S. EPA Contacts

** Document Editor

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Research and Development

National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory

Atlantic Ecology Division, Narragansett, RI

Mid-Continent Ecology Division, Duluth, MN
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Healthy eating after 50.**
 
2008 | 2012 | 2015 | 2017 | 2019
 
SuDoc Number:HE 20.3861:EA 8/
Item Number:0447-A-12 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001100098
 
July 11, 2019
**EXHIBIT 31**

**        CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Nora Coccaro certify that: 

1.     I have reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB (“Report”) of Providence Resources, Inc.; 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report; 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the period presented in this Report; 

4.     I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared; 

b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and 

c)     Disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.     I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: April 5, 2007 

/s/ Nora Coccaro 

Nora Coccaro Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer 

**27**

----