68764 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 227 / Friday, November 26, 2004 / Rules and Regulations 

the 2003–04 season totaled $102,988. 

Absent the suspension of § 979.219, 

assessments collected during the 2004–

05 season would have been about 

$292,840. 

The Committee considered 

suspension of the marketing order, but 

wished to continue receiving data on 

plantings for a one-year period before 

deciding whether the order should be 

continued.

It is possible that the Committee 

might recommend that the order be 

terminated after the 2004–2005 season if 

conditions do not improve. Some 

Committee members felt that 

termination was premature, while 

others felt the order should be 

immediately eliminated. The Committee 

recommended the suspension of 

regulations for one fiscal period as an 

orderly and reasonable compromise. 

This will enable the committee to study 

the impact of suspension, allow the 

continued collection of data on acreage 

projections, and minimize disruption if 

the Committee chooses to recommend 

termination after the 2004–2005 fiscal 

period. 

In accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 

Chapter 35), the information collection 

requirements being suspended by this 

rule were approved previously by the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) and assigned OMB No. 0581–

0178. Suspension of some of the 

reporting requirements is expected to 

reduce the reporting burden on small or 

large South Texas melon handlers by 

6.12 hours, and should further reduce 

industry expenses. During the 

suspension period, handlers will not 

have to file the following forms with the 

Committee: Application for Registered 

Handler (1.74 burden hours); 

Certification for Handling Melons for 

Processing (0.70 burden hours); Relief or 

Charity Certification for Handling 

Melons Which Fail to Meet the South 

Texas Rules and Regulations (0.35 

burden hours); Certificate of Privilege 

(0.83 burden hours); and Special 

Purpose Shipment (2.50 hours). This 

rule will not impose any additional 

reporting or recordkeeping requirements 

on either small or large melon handlers. 

As with all Federal marketing order 

programs, reports and forms are 

periodically reviewed to reduce 

information requirements and 

duplication by industry and public 

sector agencies. 

In addition, USDA has not identified 

any relevant Federal rules that 

duplicate, overlap or conflict with this 

rule. 

Further, the Committee’s meeting was 

widely publicized throughout the melon 

industry and all interested persons were 

invited to attend the meeting and 

participate in Committee deliberations. 

Like all Committee meetings, the 

September 16, 2004, meeting was a 

public meeting and all entities, both 

large and small, were able to express 

their views on this issue. Finally, 

interested persons are invited to submit 

information on the regulatory and 

informational impacts of this action on 

small businesses. 

A small business guide on complying 

with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop 

marketing agreements and orders may 

be viewed at: http://www.ams.usda.gov/

fv/moab.html. Any questions about the 

compliance guide should be sent to Jay 

Guerber at the previously mentioned 

address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section. 

This rule invites comments on 

suspension of the handling, assessment 

collection, and some reporting 

regulations currently prescribed under 

the South Texas melon marketing order. 

Any comments received will be 

considered prior to finalization of this 

rule. 

After consideration of all relevant 

material presented, including the 

Committee’s recommendation, and 

other information, it is found that the 

regulations suspended by this interim 

final rule, as hereinafter set forth, no 

longer tend to effectuate the declared 

policy of the Act. 

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also 

found and determined upon good cause 

that it is impracticable, unnecessary, 

and contrary to the public interest to 

give preliminary notice prior to putting 

this rule into effect and that good cause 

exists for not postponing the effective 

date of this rule until 30 days after 

publication in the Federal Register

because: (1) The rule suspends the 

current handling, assessment collection, 

some reporting requirements, and 

related regulations for South Texas 

melons for the remainder of the 2004–

2005 fiscal period; (2) this rule was 

recommended by the Committee at an 

open public meeting and all interested 

persons had an opportunity to express 

their views and provide input; (3) South 

Texas melon handlers are aware of this 

rule and need no additional time to 

comply with the relaxed requirements; 

and (4) this rule provides a 60-day 

comment period and any comments 

received will be considered prior to 

finalization of this rule.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 979

Marketing agreements, Melons, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements.

■ For the reasons set forth in the 

preamble, 7 CFR part 979 is amended as 

follows:

PART 979—MELONS GROWN IN 

SOUTH TEXAS

■ 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 

979 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.

■ 2. In Part 979, §§ 979.106, 979.112, 

979.152, 979.155, 979.219, and 979.304 

are suspended in their entirety effective 

November 27, 2004, through September 

30, 2005.

Dated: November 19, 2004. 

A.J. Yates, 

Administrator, Agricultural Marketing 

Service.

[FR Doc. 04–26120 Filed 11–24–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–02–P

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service 

7 CFR Parts 1000, 1001, 1005, 1006, 

1007, 1030, 1032, 1033, 1124, 1126, and 

1131

[Docket No. AO–14–A72, et al.; DA–03–08] 

Milk in the Northeast and Other 

Marketing Areas; Order Amending the 

Orders

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, 

USDA.

ACTION: Final rule.

7 CFR part Marketing area AO Nos. 

1001 ........................................................................................ Northeast ................................................................................ AO–14–A72

1005 ........................................................................................ Appalachian ........................................................................... AO–388–A13

1006 ........................................................................................ Florida .................................................................................... AO–356–A36

1007 ........................................................................................ Southeast ............................................................................... AO–366–A42

1030 ........................................................................................ Upper Midwest ....................................................................... AO–361–A37

1032 ........................................................................................ Central .................................................................................... AO–313–A46

1033 ........................................................................................ Mideast ................................................................................... AO–166–A70

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 227 / Friday, November 26, 2004 / Rules and Regulations 68765

1Federal milk orders do not classify products but 

instead classify the milk (skim milk and butterfat) 

disposed of in the form of a product or used to 

produce a product. This rule references ‘‘Class I 

products,’’ ‘‘Class II products,’’ ‘‘Class III products,’’

and ‘‘Class IV products’’ to simplify the findings 

and conclusions.

7 CFR part Marketing area AO Nos. 

1124 ........................................................................................ Pacific Northwest ................................................................... AO–368–A33

1126 ........................................................................................ Southwest .............................................................................. AO–231–A66

1131 ........................................................................................ Arizona-Las Vegas ................................................................. AO–271–A38

SUMMARY: This document adopts as a 

final rule order language contained in 

the final decision published in the 

Federal Register on September 24, 2004, 

concerning the reclassification of milk 

used to produce evaporated or 

sweetened condensed milk in 

consumer-type packages from Class III 

to Class IV. These provisions are 

applicable to all Federal milk marketing 

orders. More than the required number 

of producers in each of the 10 Federal 

orders approved the issuance of the 

amended orders.

DATES: Effective December 1, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Antoinette M. Carter, Marketing 

Specialist, USDA/AMS/Dairy Programs, 

Order Formulation and Enforcement 

Branch, STOP 0231—Room 2971, 1400 

Independence Avenue, SW., 

Washington, DC 20250–0231, (202) 690–

3465, e-mail address: 

antoinette.carter@usda.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

administrative rule is governed by the 

provisions of Sections 556 and 557 of 

Title 5 of the United States Code and, 

therefore, is excluded from the 

requirements of Executive Order 12866. 

This final rule has been reviewed 

under Executive Order 12988, Civil 

Justice Reform. This rule is not intended 

to have a retroactive effect. This rule 

will not preempt any state or local laws, 

regulations, or policies, unless they 

present an irreconcilable conflict with 

the rule. 

The Agricultural Marketing 

Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 

U.S.C. 601–674), provides that 

administrative proceedings must be 

exhausted before parties may file suit in 

court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the 

Act, any handler subject to an order may 

request modification or exemption from 

such order by filing with the 

Department a petition stating that the 

order, any provision of the order, or any 

obligation imposed in connection with 

the order is not in accordance with the 

law. A handler is afforded the 

opportunity for a hearing on the 

petition. After a hearing, the Department 

would rule on the petition. The Act 

provides that the District Court of the 

United States in any district in which 

the handler is an inhabitant, or has its 

principal place of business, has 

jurisdiction in equity to review the 

Department’s ruling on the petition, 

provided a bill in equity is filed not 

later than 20 days after the date of the 

entry of the ruling. 

Regulatory Flexibility Act 

In accordance with the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the 

Agricultural Marketing Service has 

considered the economic impact of this 

action on small entities and has certified 

that this rule will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities. For the 

purpose of the Regulatory Flexibility 

Act, a dairy farm is considered a ‘‘small 

business’’ if it has an annual gross 

revenue of less than $750,000, and a 

dairy products manufacturer is a ‘‘small 

business’’ if it has fewer than 500 

employees. 

For the purposes of determining 

which dairy farms are ‘‘small 

businesses,’’ the $750,000 per year 

criterion was used to establish a 

production guideline of 500,000 pounds 

per month. Although this guideline does 

not factor in additional monies that may 

be received by dairy producers, it 

should be an inclusive standard for 

most ‘‘small’’ dairy farmers. For 

purposes of determining a handler’s 

size, if the plant is part of a larger 

company operating multiple plants that 

collectively exceed the 500-employee 

limit, the plant will be considered a 

large business even if the local plant has 

fewer than 500 employees. 

During June 2003—the most recent 

representative period at the time of the 

hearing—there were a total of 60,096 

dairy producers whose milk was pooled 

under Federal milk orders. Of the total, 

56,818 dairy producers—or about 95 

percent—were considered small 

businesses based on the above criteria. 

During this same period, there were 

about 1,622 plants associated with 

Federal milk orders. Specifically, there 

were approximately 387 fully regulated 

plants (of which 143 were small 

businesses), 92 partially regulated 

plants (of which 41 were small 

businesses), 44 producer-handlers (of 

which 23 were considered small 

businesses), and 108 exempt plants (of 

which 98 were considered small 

businesses). Consequently, 950 of the 

1,622 plants meet the definition of a 

small business.

Total pounds of milk pooled under all 

Federal milk orders was 10.498 billion 

for June 2003 which represented 73.5 

percent of the milk marketed in the 

United States during June 2003. Of the 

10.498 billion pounds of milk pooled 

under Federal milk orders during June 

2003, 1.78 million pounds—or 1.7 

percent—was used to produce 

evaporated milk and sweetened 

condensed milk products in consumertype packages. Additionally, during this 

same period, total pounds of Class I 

milk pooled under Federal milk orders 

was 3.475 billion pounds, which 

represents 82.3 percent of the milk used 

in Class I products (mainly fluid milk 

products) that were sold in the United 

States. 

This final rule implements proposals 

that reclassify milk used to produce 

evaporated milk in consumer-type 

packages or sweetened condensed milk 

in consumer-type packages from Class 

III to Class IV in all Federal milk orders. 

This rule is consistent with the 

Agricultural Agreement Act of 1937 

(Act), which authorizes Federal milk 

marketing orders. The Act specifies that 

Federal milk orders classify milk ‘‘in 

accordance with the form for which or 

purpose for which it is used.’’

Currently, the Federal milk order 

system provides for the uniform 

classification of milk in provisions that 

define four classes of use for milk (Class 

I, Class II, Class III, and Class IV). Each 

Federal milk order sets minimum prices 

that processors must pay for milk based 

on how it is used and computes 

weighted average or uniform prices that 

dairy producers receive. 

Under the milk classification 

provisions of all Federal milk orders, 

Class I consists of those products that 

are used as beverages (whole milk, low 

fat milk, skim milk, flavored milk 

products like chocolate milk, etc.)1

Class II includes soft or spoonable 

products such as cottage cheese, sour 

cream, ice cream, yogurt, and milk that 

is used in the manufacturing of other 

food products. Class III includes all 

skim milk and butterfat used to make 

hard cheeses—types that may be grated, 

shredded, or crumbled; cream cheese; 

other spreadable cheeses; plastic cream; 

anhydrous milkfat; and butteroil. Class 

68766 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 227 / Friday, November 26, 2004 / Rules and Regulations 

III also consists of evaporated milk and 

sweetened condensed milk in 

consumer-type packages. Class IV 

includes, among other things, butter and 

any milk product in dried form such as 

nonfat dry milk.

Evaporated milk and sweetened 

condensed milk in consumer-type 

packages are now classified as Class IV 

because their product characteristics 

and yields are tied directly to the solids 

content of the raw milk used to make 

these products as opposed to the protein 

content as for Class III products. Like 

other Class IV products, evaporated 

milk and sweetened condensed milk in 

consumer-type packages have a 

relatively long shelf-life (i.e., the 

products can be stored for more than 

one year without refrigeration). These 

products also may be substituted for 

other Class IV products (e.g., dry whole 

milk or nonfat dry milk) and compete 

over a wide geographic area with 

products made from non-Federally 

regulated milk. Additionally, like other 

Class IV products, evaporated milk and 

sweetened condensed milk in 

consumer-type packages are competitive 

outlets for milk surplus to the Class I 

needs of the market. 

The amendments in this final rule 

will not have a significant economic 

impact on dairy producers or handlers 

associated with Federal milk orders. 

Since the reclassification of evaporated 

milk and sweetened condensed milk in 

consumer-type packages will be uniform 

in all Federal milk orders, dairy 

producers and handlers associated with 

the orders will be subject to the same 

provisions. The classification change 

will have only a minimal impact on the 

price dairy producers receive for their 

milk due to the small quantity of milk 

pooled under Federal milk orders that is 

used to produce evaporated milk or 

sweetened condensed milk in 

consumer-type packages. For example, 

using the Department’s production data 

provided in the hearing record for milk, 

skim milk, and cream used to produce 

evaporated milk and sweetened 

condensed milk in consumer-type 

packages by handlers regulated under 

Federal milk orders for the three years 

of 2000 through 2002, the 

reclassification of the milk used to 

produce these products from Class III to 

Class IV would have affected the 

statistical uniform price for all Federal 

milk orders combined by only $0.0117 

per hundredweight. 

Paperwork Reduction Act 

A review of reporting requirements 

was completed under the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 

Chapter 35). It was determined that 

these proposed amendments would 

have no impact on reporting, 

recordkeeping, or other compliance 

requirements because they would 

remain identical to the current 

requirements. No new forms are 

proposed and no additional reporting 

requirements would be necessary. 

This action does not require 

additional information collection that 

requires clearance by the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) beyond 

currently approved information 

collection. The primary sources of data 

used to complete the forms are routinely 

used in most business transactions. 

Forms require only a minimal amount of 

information which can be supplied 

without data processing equipment or a 

trained statistical staff. Thus, the 

information collection and reporting 

burden is relatively small. Requiring the 

same reports for all handlers does not 

significantly disadvantage any handler 

that is smaller than the industry 

average. 

Prior Documents in This Proceeding 

Notice of Hearing: Issued September 

2, 2003; published September 8, 2003 

(68 FR 52860). 

Correction to Notice of Hearing:

Issued October 9, 2003; published 

October 16, 2003 (68 FR 59554). 

Tentative Final Decision: Issued 

February 27, 2004; published March 2, 

2004 (69 FR 9763). 

Interim Final Rule: Issued April 19, 

2004; published April 23, 2004 (69 FR 

21950). 

Final Decision: Issued September 20, 

2004; published September 24, 2004 (69 

FR 57233). 

Findings and Determinations 

The findings and determinations 

hereinafter set forth supplement those 

that were made when the Northeast and 

other orders were first issued and when 

they were amended. The previous 

findings and determinations are hereby 

ratified and confirmed, except where 

they may conflict with those set forth 

herein.

The following findings are hereby 

made with respect to each of the 

aforesaid orders: 

(a) Findings upon the basis of the 

hearing record. Pursuant to the 

provisions of the Agricultural Marketing 

Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 

U.S.C. 601–674), and the applicable 

rules of practice and procedure 

governing the formulation of marketing 

agreements and marketing orders (7 CFR 

Part 900), a public hearing was held 

upon certain proposed amendments to 

the tentative marketing agreements and 

to the order regulating the handling of 

milk in the respective marketing areas. 

Upon the basis of the evidence 

introduced at such hearing and the 

record thereof it is found that: 

(1) The said orders, as hereby 

amended, and all of the terms and 

conditions thereof, will tend to 

effectuate the declared policy of the Act; 

(2) The parity prices of milk, as 

determined pursuant to section 2 of the 

Act, are not reasonable in view of the 

price of feeds, available supplies of 

feeds, and other economic conditions 

which affect market supply and demand 

for milk in the marketing area, and the 

minimum prices specified in the orders, 

as hereby amended, are such prices as 

will reflect the aforesaid factors, insure 

a sufficient quantity of pure and 

wholesome milk, and be in the public 

interest; and 

(3) The said orders, as hereby 

amended, regulate the handling of milk 

in the same manner as, and are 

applicable only to persons in the 

respective classes of industrial and 

commercial activity specified in, 

marketing agreement upon which a 

hearing has been held. 

(b) Additional Findings. It is 

necessary in the public interest to make 

these amendments to the Northeast and 

other orders effective December 1, 2004. 

Any delay beyond that date would tend 

to disrupt the orderly marketing of milk 

in the aforesaid marketing areas. 

The amendments to these orders are 

known to handlers. The final decision 

containing the proposed amendments to 

these orders was issued on September 

20, 2004. 

The changes that result from these 

amendments will not require extensive 

preparation or substantial alteration in 

the method of operation for handlers. In 

view of the foregoing, it is hereby found 

and determined that good cause exists 

for making these order amendments 

effective for milk marketed on or after 

December 1, 2004. 

(c) Determinations. It is hereby 

determined that: 

(1) The refusal or failure of handlers 

(excluding cooperative associations 

specified in Sec. 8c(9) of the Act) of 

more than 50 percent of the milk, which 

is marketed within the specified 

marketing area, to sign a proposed 

marketing agreement, tends to prevent 

the effectuation of the declared policy of 

the Act; 

(2) The issuance of this order 

amending the Northeast and other 

orders is the only practical means 

pursuant to the declared policy of the 

Act of advancing the interests of 

producers as defined in the orders as 

hereby amended; 

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 227 / Friday, November 26, 2004 / Rules and Regulations 68767

(3) The issuance of the order 

amending the Northeast and other 

orders is favored by at least two-thirds 

of the producers who were engaged in 

the production of milk for sale in the 

marketing area. 

Specifically, this final rule 

permanently adopts classification of 

milk use provisions that reclassify milk 

used to produce evaporated or 

sweetened condensed milk products in 

consumer type-packages from Class III 

to Class IV.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Parts 1000, 

1001, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1030, 1032, 

1033, 1124, 1126, and 1131

Milk marketing orders.

Order Relative to Handling

■ It is therefore ordered, that on and after 

the effective date hereof, the handling of 

milk in the Northeast and other 

marketing areas shall be in conformity to 

and in compliance with the terms and 

conditions of the orders, as amended, 

and as hereby further amended, as 

follows:

■ Parts 1000, 1001, 1005, 1006, 1007, 

1030, 1032, 1033, 1124, 1126, and 

1131—General Provisions and Milk in 

the Northeast and other Milk Marketing 

Areas.

■ The interim final rule amending 7 CFR 

parts 1000, 1001, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1030, 

1032, 1033, 1124, 1126, and 1131 which 

was published at 69 FR 21950 on April 

23, 2004, is adopted as a final rule 

without change.

Dated: November 19, 2004. 

A.J. Yates, 

Administrator, Agricultural Marketing 

Serivce.

[FR Doc. 04–26123 Filed 11–24–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–02–U

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION

12 CFR Parts 613, 614, and 618

RIN 3052–AC06

Eligibility and Scope of Financing; 

Loan Policies and Operations; General 

Provisions; Credit and Related 

Services; Effective Date

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.

ACTION: Notice of effective date.

SUMMARY: The Farm Credit 

Administration (FCA) published a final 

rule under parts 613, 614, and 618 on 

July 21, 2004 (69 FR 43511). This final 

rule amends regulations governing 

domestic and international lending, 

certain intra-Farm Credit System 

consent requirements concerning 

similar entity participation transactions, 

provisions of general financing 

agreements, and related services. In 

accordance with 12 U.S.C. 2252, the 

effective date of the final rule is 30 days 

from the date of publication in the 

Federal Register during which either or 

both Houses of Congress are in session. 

Based on the records of the sessions of 

Congress, the effective date of the 

regulations is November 19, 2004.

DATES: The regulation amending 12 CFR 

parts 613, 614, and 618 published on 

July 21, 2004 (69 FR 43511), is effective 

November 19, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dale 

Aultman, Policy Analyst, Office of 

Policy and Analysis, Farm Credit 

Administration, McLean, VA 22102–

5090, (703) 883–4498, TTY (703) 883–

4434; or James Morris, Senior Counsel, 

Office of General Counsel, Farm Credit 

Administration, McLean, VA 22102–

5090, (703) 883–4020, TTY (703) 883–

2020.

(12 U.S.C. 2252(a)(9) and (10))

Dated: November 19, 2004. 

Jeanette C. Brinkley, 

Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.

[FR Doc. 04–26131 Filed 11–24–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6705–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 2003–NE–61–AD; Amendment 

39–13879 AD 2004–24–03] 

RIN 2120–AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Hamilton 

Sundstrand Power Systems T–62T 

Series Auxiliary Power Units (APUs)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for 

Hamilton Sundstrand Power Systems 

Models T–62T–46C12 and T–62T–

40C14 (APS 500R) APUs with fuel filter 

housing assembly, part number (P/N) 

4951627, 4951960, or 4952039, 

installed. This AD requires installation 

of a bracket to prevent a failed bypass 

button from protruding beyond the 

internal o-ring seal. This AD results 

from reports of leaks caused by cracked 

bypass buttons that protruded beyond 

the o-ring seal. We are issuing this AD 

to prevent a fire or explosion caused by 

a fuel leak from a failed bypass button 

on the fuel filter housing.

DATES: This AD becomes effective 

January 3, 2005. The Director of the 

Federal Register approved the 

incorporation by reference of certain 

publications listed in the regulations as 

of January 3, 2005.

ADDRESSES: You can get the service 

information identified in this AD from 

Hamilton Sundstrand Technical 

Publications Department, P.O. Box 

7002, Rockford, IL 61125–7002, U.S.A. 

You may examine the AD docket at 

the FAA, New England Region, Office of 

the Regional Counsel, 12 New England 

Executive Park, Burlington, MA. You 

may examine the service information, at 

the FAA, New England Region, Office of 

the Regional Counsel, 12 New England 

Executive Park, Burlington, MA; or at 

the National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For 

information on the availability of this 

material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, 

or go to: http://www.archives.gov/

federal_register/

code_of_federal_regulations/

ibr_locations.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Roger Pesuit, Aerospace Engineer, Los 

Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 

FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

3960 Paramount Blvd., Lakewood, CA 

90712–4137; telephone (562) 627–5251, 

fax (562) 627–5210.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA 

proposed to amend 14 CFR part 39 with 

a proposed airworthiness directive (AD). 

The proposed AD applies to Hamilton 

Sundstrand Power Systems Models T–

62T–46C12 and T–62T–40C14 (APS 

500R) APUs with fuel filter housing 

assembly, P/N 4951627, 4951960, or 

4952039 installed. We published the 

proposed AD in the Federal Register on 

May 7, 2004 (69 FR 25525). That action 

proposed to require installation of a 

bracket to prevent a failed bypass button 

from protruding beyond the internal oring seal. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD Docket 

(including any comments and service 

information), by appointment, between 

8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. See

ADDRESSES for the location. 

Comments 

We provided the public the 

opportunity to participate in the 

development of this AD. We have 

considered the comments received. 

Request To Add Alert Service Bulletin 

Reference 

Two commenters request that for 

APUs Model T–62T–40C14 (APS 500R),