alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      32.2**

**Certification**

**Pursuant      to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the**

**United      States Code as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906**

**of      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),                as                applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,                and |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: October                31, 2007   | /s/              Robert F. Kendall |
|---------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                                                    | Name:                              | Robert F. Kendall, CPA |
|                                                    | Title:                             | Chief                Financial Officer(principal                financial officer) |

----
| **Fair Value (Narrative) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions** | Sep. 30, 2022 | Dec. 31, 2021 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|---------------|
| **Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]**                        |          |          |
| Other invested assets overseas deposit                       | $ 65          | $ 74          |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Overseas deposits are excluded from the fair value hierarchy because their fair value is recorded using the net asset value per share (or equivalent) practical experiment, which can be redeemed at net asset value in 90 days or less.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**cna_OtherInvestedAssetsOverseasDeposit**Namespace Prefix:**cna_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**debit**Period Type:**instant |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_FairValueDisclosuresAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
EXHIBIT 32
----------




          CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
          --------------------------------------------------


     The following statement is provided by the undersigned with respect
to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be
deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 or any other securities law:

     Each of the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on
Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of KAANAPALI LAND, LLC.




    By: /s/  Gary Nickele               By: /s/  Gailen J. Hull
        ---------------------------         ---------------------------
        Gary Nickele                        Gailen J. Hull
        Chief Executive Officer             Chief Financial Officer and
                                            Chief Accounting Officer
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2380

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize additional compensation 

to be paid to certain veterans in receipt of compensation for a serviceconnected disability rated totally disabling for whom a family member 

dependent on the veteran for support provides care. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 5, 2003

Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize additional compensation to be paid to certain veterans in 

receipt of compensation for a service-connected disability 

rated totally disabling for whom a family member dependent on the veteran for support provides care.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Disabled Veterans’ 

5 Caregiver Compensation Act’’. 
2

•HR 2380 IH 

1 SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION FOR DISABLED VET2 ERANS IN NEED OF REGULAR AID AND AT3 TENDANCE WHO HAVE DEPENDENT FAMILY 

4 MEMBER CAREGIVERS. 

5 Section 1115 of title 38, United States Code, is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following new para7 graph: 

8 ‘‘(3) If and while rated totally disabled and in 

9 need of regular aid and attendance and while unpaid 

10 aid and attendance is provided by an adult family 

11 member who is dependent upon such veteran for 

12 support, $234.’’.

Æ
Order entered August 5 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 00502 - CV SHAMELYA ETIER, Appellant

V. STAMPES, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at L aw No. 4

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC - 19 - 02004 - D



### O RDER Before the Court is the August 1, 2019 request of Coral Wahlen, Official Court Reporter for County Court at Law No. 4, for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. We GRA NT the request and extend the time to September 3, 2019

. /s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
[Cite as In re P.F., 121 Ohio St.3d 360, 2009-Ohio-1518.]

IN RE P.F. 

[Cite as In re P.F., 121 Ohio St.3d 360, 2009-Ohio-1518.]

Judgment of the court of appeals reversed on the authority of In re L.A.B. and 

cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with 

In re L.A.B. 

(No. 2008-1195 — Submitted February 18, 2009 — Decided April 7, 2009.) 

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lorain County, 

No. 07CA009243, 2008-Ohio-2105. 

__________________ 

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of 

In re L.A.B., 121 Ohio St.3d 112, 2009-Ohio-354, 902 N.E.2d 471, and the cause 

is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with In re L.A.B. 

 MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR,

O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. 

______________________ 

 Dennis P. Will, Lorain County Prosecuting Attorney, and Billie Jo Belcher 

and Christopher J. Pierre, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellee, state of 

Ohio. 

 Robert Cabrera, for appellant, P.F. 

______________________
§ 301.48 Continuing guaranties. ( a ) ( 1 ) Under section 10 of the Act any person residing in the United States and handling fur or fur products may file a continuing guaranty with the Federal Trade Commission. When filed with the Commission a continuing guaranty shall be fully executed in duplicate. Forms for use in preparing continuing guaranties shall be supplied by the Commission upon request.
( 2 ) Continuing guaranties filed with the Commission shall continue in effect until revoked. The guarantor shall promptly report any change in business status to the Commission.
( 3 ) The prescribed form for a continuing guaranty is found in § 303.38(b) of this chapter. The form is available upon request from the Textile Section, Enforcement Division, Federal Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20580.
( b ) Any person who has a continuing guaranty on file with the Commission may, during the effective dates of the guaranty, give notice of such fact by setting forth on the invoice or other document covering the marketing or handling of the product guaranteed the following: “Continuing guaranty under the Fur Products Labeling Act filed with the Federal Trade Commission.”
( c ) Any person who falsely represents in writing that he has a continuing guaranty on file with the Federal Trade Commission when such is not a fact shall be deemed to have furnished a false guaranty under section 10(b) of the Act.
[26 FR 3188, Apr. 14, 1961, as amended at 48 FR 12517, Mar. 25, 1983; 63 FR 7517, Feb. 13, 1998; 63 FR 71583, Dec. 28, 1998; 79 FR 30458, May 28, 2014]
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3603 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3603

   To authorize 150,000 incremental vouchers for tenant-based rental 
assistance under section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 to 
          help meet the housing needs of low-income families.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 7, 2011

  Mr. Rothman of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize 150,000 incremental vouchers for tenant-based rental 
assistance under section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 to 
          help meet the housing needs of low-income families.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Housing Opportunities Made Easier 
Act'' or the ``HOME Act''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN INCREMENTAL SECTION 8 RENTAL ASSISTANCE VOUCHERS.

    (a) Provision of Incremental Vouchers.--Subject only to the 
appropriation of sufficient amounts pursuant to subsection (b), in 
fiscal year 2012 the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall 
provide to public housing agencies tenant-based rental housing 
assistance under section 8(o) of the United States Housing Act of 1937 
(42 U.S.C. 1437f(o)) for 150,000 incremental vouchers, and shall renew 
such vouchers in each fiscal year thereafter.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated--
            (1) for fiscal year 2012, such sums as may be necessary to 
        provide the incremental vouchers described in subsection (a); 
        and
            (2) in each fiscal year thereafter, such sums as may be 
        necessary to renew the vouchers described in subsection (a) for 
        that year.
Any amounts appropriated pursuant to this subsection shall remain 
available until expended.
                                 <all>
```
§ 303.16 Arrangement and disclosure of information on labels. ( a ) Subject to the provisions of § 303.15(b), information required by the Act and regulations in this part may appear on any label or labels attached to the textile fiber product, including the care label required by 16 CFR part 423, provided all the pertinent requirements of the Act and regulations in this part are met and so long as the combination of required information and non-required information is not misleading. The required information shall include the following: ( 1 ) The generic names and percentages by weight of the constituent fibers present in the textile fiber product, excluding permissive ornamentation, in amounts of 5 percent or more and any fibers disclosed in accordance with § 303.3(a) shall appear in order of predominance by weight with any percentage of fiber or fibers required to be designated as “other fiber” or “other fibers” appearing last.
( 2 ) The name, provided for in § 303.19, or registered identification number issued by the Commission, of the manufacturer or of one or more persons marketing or handling the textile fiber product.
( 3 ) The name of the country where such product was processed or manufactured, as provided for in § 303.33.
( b ) All parts of the required information shall be set forth in such a manner as to be clearly legible, conspicuous, and readily accessible to the prospective purchaser. All parts of the fiber content information shall appear in type or lettering of equal size and conspicuousness.
( c ) Subject to the provisions of § 303.17, any non-required information or representations placed on the product shall not minimize, detract from, or conflict with required information and shall not be false, deceptive, or misleading.
( d ) Non-deceptive terms which are properly and truthfully descriptive of a fiber may be used in conjunction with the generic name of such fiber; as for example: “100 percent cross-linked rayon,” “100 percent solution dyed acetate,” “100 percent combed cotton,” “100 percent nylon 66,” etc.
[24 FR 4480, June 2, 1959, as amended at 25 FR 4317, May 14, 1960; 30 FR 14254, Nov. 13, 1965; 30 FR 15313, Dec. 11, 1965; 50 FR 15107, Apr. 17, 1985; 53 FR 31315, Aug. 18, 1988; 63 FR 7518, Feb. 13, 1998]
No. 15-077 November 18, 2015

CONTACT: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200

NRC Issues Final Environmental Review on License Renewal for

Braidwood Nuclear Power Plant in Illinois

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has published its final review detailing the environmental 

impacts of renewing the operating licenses of the Braidwood Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2. The 

supplemental environmental impact statement contains the NRC staff’s conclusion that the impacts 

would not preclude renewing the plant’s licenses for an additional 20 years.

The Braidwood plant has two pressurized-water reactors, located in Braceville, Ill. about 20 

miles southwest of Joliet. The reactors are currently licensed to operate through Oct. 17, 2026, for Unit 

1 and Dec. 18, 2027, for Unit 2. The operator, Exelon Generation Co., submitted its renewal application 

May 29, 2013. 

The report is Supplement 55 to NUREG-1437, Generic Environmental Impact Statement for 

License Renewal of Nuclear Plants. It is now available on the NRC’s website. The NRC published a 

draft version of the report in March 2015 for public comment. The final report includes the staff’s 

responses to the comments.

The Braidwood license renewal application and general information about reactor license 

renewal are available on the NRC website.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Salomon Smith Barney AAA Energy Fund L.P. II (the ‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Jerry Pascucci, President and Director of Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities         Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial         condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Jerry Pascucci

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

Jerry PascucciCitigroup Managed Futures LLC President and Director

August 14, 2007

----
No: II-14-009 March 11, 2014

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416 

NRC Issues Confirmatory Order to Summer Nuclear Power Plant; 

Prohibits Former Contract Employee from NRC-Licensed Activities for Five Years 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a confirmatory order to South Carolina Electric 

& Gas Co.’s Summer nuclear power plant. The company has agreed to a series of corrective actions 

related to its allowing access to an individual who had deliberately concealed information in order to 

obtain employment at the site. The Summer plant is located near Jenkinsville, S.C., 26 miles northwest 

of Columbia.

The order stems from a settlement achieved under the NRC’s Alternative Dispute Resolution 

process, which was requested by SCE&G to address two apparent violations related to the 2010 event. 

Those violations involved the actions of a former contract employee who falsified a personnel history 

questionnaire and provided a fictitious court document. After the company discovered the fabrications 

in early 2011, SCE&G promptly terminated the individual’s employment and took a number of 

immediate steps to reduce the likelihood of recurrence. 

The NRC’s ADR process refers to mediation facilitated by a neutral third party with no 

decision-making authority who assists the NRC and a licensee in reaching an agreement when there are 

differences regarding an enforcement action. 

A mediation session between the NRC staff and SCE&G was held on Oct. 8 and a settlement 

was reached. A confirmatory order, issued on March 10, outlines the corrective actions and steps

SCE&G has taken and agreed to take to address the violations. 

Corrective actions already taken include a detailed analysis of the event and subsequent review 

of the company’s site access process, sharing of the information within the company and throughout the 

nuclear industry, requiring official authentication of all criminal history judicial records, and program 

improvements such as independent reviews of information, enhanced training and periodic 

assessments. Under the order, SCE&G has committed to other actions including further industry-wide 

discussion of the event and additional training.

In addition to the actions taken by the company and outlined in the order, the NRC issued an 

order to the former contract employee prohibiting him from engaging in all NRC-licensed activities for 

five years. 
Page | 2

“Most of the actions were completed by the company well before the ADR session and their 

prompt and comprehensive nature means we believe our concerns can be resolved through this order 

and no additional enforcement actions are needed,” said NRC Region II Regional Administrator Victor 

McCree. “The steps they have taken and plan to implement give us confidence that a similar event is 

very unlikely.”
§ 1616.1 Scope and application. ( a ) This Standard provides a test method to determine the flammability of children's sleepwear, sizes 7 through 14 and fabric or related material intended or promoted for use in such children's sleepwear.
( b ) All sleepwear items as defined in § 1616.2(c), are subject to the requirements of this Standard.
( c ) Children's sleepwear items which meet all the requirements of the Standard for the Flammability of Children's Sleepwear: Sizes 0 through 6X (FF 3-71) (subpart A of part 1615 of this chapter) are in compliance with this Standard. FF 3-71 was issued July 29, 1971 (36 FR 14062), and amended July 21, 1972 (37 FR 14624).
( d ) As used in this Standard, *pass* and *fail* refer to the test criteria for specimens while *accept* and *reject* refer to the acceptance or rejection of a production unit under the sampling plan.
( e ) The flammability standards for clothing textiles and vinyl plastic film, parts 1610 and 1611 of this chapter, are superseded by this part 1616 insofar as they apply to items defined in § 1616.2(c).
Cash compensation arrangements with the non-employee Directors



 Exhibit 10.6 
 BOARD OF DIRECTORS CASH COMPENSATION 
 Effective June 1, 2007
the annual cash retainers for non-employee directors are as follows: 
  

					
	 Each member of the Board
	 	$45,000	 	
			
	 Additional retainers:
	 		 	
			
	 Chairman of the Board
	 	$20,000 (plus $50,000 for period from June 2007 through November 2007)	 	
	 Chairman of Committees:
	 		 	
	 Audit
	 	$20,000	 	
	 Compensation
	 	$10,000	 	
	 Nominating and Corp. Gov.
	 	$  6,000	 	
	 Strategic Planning
	 	$  4,000	 	
			
	 Other Committee Members:
	 		 	
	 Audit
	 	$10,000	 	
	 Compensation
	 	$  5,000	 	
	 Nominating and Corp. Gov.
	 	$  3,000	 	
	 Strategic Planning
	 	$  2,000
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of ARC Corporate Realty Trust, Inc.® (ACRT) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce Nelson, Chief Financial
Officer of ACRT, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of ACRT.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Bruce Nelson       
|Bruce Nelson           
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 10, 2005      



34
No: I-15-032 June 30, 2015

CONTACT: Diane Screnci 610-337-5330

 Neil Sheehan 610-337-5331

New NRC Resident Inspector Assigned To Limerick Nuclear Plant

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia, Pa., have 

selected Matthew Fannon as the new Resident Inspector at the Limerick nuclear 

power plant in Limerick, Pa. Exelon Nuclear operates the two-unit site. 

“Matt Fannon’s training and technical expertise will assist the NRC in 

carrying out its mission to protect people and the environment by ensuring the safe 

operation of Limerick,” said NRC Region I Administrator Dan Dorman.

Fannon joined the Region I office in June 2013 after graduating from the University of 

Tennessee with a bachelor’s degree in nuclear engineering. Most recently, he was a reactor engineer in 

the Region I Division of Reactor Projects. He is a graduate of the NRC’s Nuclear Safety Professional 

Development Program and has completed a rigorous inspector qualification program. He also served in 

the U.S. Navy’s nuclear propulsion program for six years. 

Fannon joins Senior Resident Inspector Scott Rutenkroger at Limerick. Each U.S. commercial 

nuclear power plant site has at least two NRC Resident Inspectors. They serve as the agency’s eyes and 

ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring significant work projects, and interacting with 

plant workers and the public.