alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|        |  |  |
|--------|--|--|
|   |
|   |

UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549__________________

FORM 8-KCURRENT REPORTPursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): April 30, 2024THE CLOROX COMPANY(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)__________________Delaware1-0715131-0595760(State or other jurisdiction of(Commission File Number)(I.R.S. Employerincorporation)Identification No.)1221 Broadway, Oakland, California94612-1888(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)(510) 271-7000(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)Not applicable(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:[ ]Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 Under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)  [ ]Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)  [ ]Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))  [ ]Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:Title of each classTradingSymbol(s)Name of each exchange on which registeredCommon Stock - $1.00 par valueCLXNew York Stock ExchangeIndicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (17 CFR 230.405) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR 240.12b-2).Emerging growth company     ☐If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.     ☐  1Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial ConditionOn April 30, 2024, The Clorox Company issued a press release announcing its financial results for its third quarter ended March 31, 2024. The full text of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference.Item 7.01 Regulation FD DisclosureAttached hereto as Exhibit 99.2 and incorporated herein by reference is supplemental financial information.Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits(d) ExhibitsSee the Exhibit Index below.EXHIBIT INDEXExhibit     Description99.1Press Release dated April 30, 2024 of The Clorox Company99.2Supplemental information regarding financial results104Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document)2SIGNATURESPursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.THE CLOROX COMPANY  Date: April 30, 2024By:/s/ Angela HiltAngela HiltExecutive Vice President – Chief Legal Officer 3
No: II-16-014 April 4, 2016

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416

NRC Launches Special Inspection of Safety Relief Valves at Hatch Nuclear Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission today launched a special inspection of safety relief valves 

on Unit 1 of the Hatch nuclear plant.

The plant, operated by Southern Nuclear Operating Co., is located near Baxley, Ga., about 20 

miles south of Vidalia.

After the unit’s last refueling outage, plant officials sent all 11 of the safety relief valves, which 

provide protection from excessive steam pressures and had been replaced during the outage with the 

same type of valve, to a laboratory for testing. During test procedures, three of the valves did not 

perform as expected. The cause of the three valves failing to close during the tests has not yet been 

determined.

Even though the valves were in service during the unit’s last operating cycle, none failed during 

reactor operations and there was no danger to the public.

“These valves provide an important safety function and it is essential that we understand why

they failed to perform as expected during these tests,” said Cathy Haney, Region II administrator. “We 

felt a special inspection was warranted to gather more information about these valves.”

The onsite inspection will be led by the senior resident inspector at Hatch. He will be assisted by 

the second Hatch resident inspector and two inspectors from NRC headquarters in Rockville, Md., both 

with valve expertise. A senior risk analyst from Region II in Atlanta will also contribute to the effort.

The five-member team will identify the circumstances of the test failures, review Southern Nuclear’s 

actions following discovery of the failures, review the testing methodologies, assess Hatch’s 

maintenance practices, evaluate the operating history of the valves and assess the licensee’s 

conclusions of the operability of the valves in service.

The onsite portion of the inspection will take several days. A report documenting the results of 

the inspection should be issued within 45 days of the completion of the inspection.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jefferson Bancshares, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
                  (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by
                  the Report.


         February 24, 2005          /s/ Anderson L. Smith
                                    --------------------------------------
                                    Anderson L. Smith
                                    President and Chief Executive Officer



         February 24, 2005          /s/ Jane P. Hutton
                                    --------------------------------------
                                    Jane P. Hutton
                                    Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and
                                     Secretary
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, Rio Grande National Forest.

# ACTION:

Extension of comment period. 

# SUMMARY:

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service (USFS), Rio Grande National Forest (RGNF) announces the extension of the comment period for the Application for Transportation and Utility Systems and Facilities for the Village at Wolf Creek Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The comment period ends December 6, 2004.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Contact Mr. Robert Dalrymple, Forest Planner, USDA-USFS, Rio Grande National Forest, (719) 852-5941.

Dated: November 16, 2004.

Peter L. Clark,

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 04-26052  Filed 11-23-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
#### In the Matter of Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Respondent, v Thomas Rondina et al., Individually and as Parents and Natural Guardians of T.J.R., Appellants.

[821 NYS2d 325]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Frederick J. Marshall, J.), entered May 5, 2005. The order granted the application for a permanent stay of arbitration.

*1231It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Respondents served their automobile insurer, petitioner, with a demand for arbitration after petitioner refused to provide uninsured motorist coverage for injuries sustained by respondents’ son while he was a passenger on an uninsured all-terrain vehicle (ATV). Contrary to respondents’ contention, Supreme Court properly granted petitioner’s application pursuant to CPLR 7503 (c) for a permanent stay of arbitration on the ground that respondents’ claim is not within the scope of petitioner’s uninsured motorist coverage. *“As*a matter of law, [uninsured motorist] coverage extends to all motor vehicles as defined by Vehicle and Traffic Law § 125” *(Harper v Lumbermen’s Mut. Cas. Co.,*174 AD2d 1031, 1031 [1991], *lv dismissed*78 NY2d 1110 [1991]; *see*Insurance Law § 5202 [a]; *Matter of Askey [General Ace. Fire & Life Assur. Corp.],*30 AD2d 632 [1968], *affd*24 NY2d 937 [1969]). Because ATVs are specifically excluded from the definition of motor vehicles set forth in Vehicle and Traffic Law § 125, the court properly concluded that the uninsured motorist endorsement in the policy issued by petitioner to respondents does not encompass the claim for the injuries sustained by respondents’ son *(see Harper,*174 AD2d 1031 [1991]; *cf. Matter of Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v Riccadulli,*183 AD2d 111). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Green, JJ.
Exhibit  99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of North American Natural Gas, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended April 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jim
Glavas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of all the Company.



                              /s/  "Jim  Glavas"
                              --------------------------
                              Jim Glavas
                              Chief Executive Officer
                              June 25, 2003


<PAGE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CATELLUSDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION**

**CERTIFICATIONBY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, Nelson C.Rising, the Chief Executive Officer of Catellus Development Corporation (the “Company”),pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, hereby certifies that:

 

(i) the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii) the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

Date:August 5, 2005

 

 
|   | /s/ NELSON C. RISING |
|--------|----------------------|
|   | **Nelson C. Rising** |

 

THIS CERTIFICATION ISFURNISHED SOLELY PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, AND IS NOT BEING FILED AS PART OF THEREPORT OR AS A SEPARATE DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT.

 

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THISWRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO CATELLUSDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND WILL BE RETAINED BY CATELLUS DEVELOPMENTCORPORATION AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITSSTAFF UPON REQUEST.

 

1

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Bureau of Industry and Security

The Regulations and Procedures Technical Advisory Committee will meet on December 7, 2004, 9 a.m., Room 3884, in the Herbert C. Hoover Building, 14th Street between Constitution and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The Committee advises the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration on implementation of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) and provides for continuing review to update the EAR as needed.

## Agenda

1. Opening remarks by the Chairman.

2. Presentation of papers or comments by the public.

3. Update on regulations.

4. Discussion on interim rule on expansion of missile-related end-use/user controls.

5. Discussion on proposed rule on “knowledge”, “red flags”, and safe harbor”.

6. Update on computer and microprocessor technology controls.

7. Update on encryption controls.

8. Update on country group revision project.

9. Update on Excluded Parties Listing Systems (EPLS).

10. Update on Automated Export System (AES).

11. Reports from working groups.

                    The meeting will be open to the public and a limited number of seats will be available. Reservations are not accepted. To the extent time permits, members of the public may present oral statements to the  Committee. Written statements may be submitted at any time before or after the meeting. However, to facilitate distribution of public presentation materials to Committee members, the Committee suggests that presenters forward the public  presentation materials to Lee Ann Carpenter at                     *Lcarpent@bis.doc.gov.*

For more information contact Ms. Carpenter on (202) 482-2583.

Dated: November 16, 2004.

Lee Ann Carpenter, 

Committee Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 04-25730  Filed 11-18-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-JT-M
Reporting Initiative Implementa

Jim Riley, NEI
Background

 Information expected for every plant Intent of Report

– Monitor Initiative implementation status– Identify deviations from implementation elemen

T dl k t

– Trend leakage events

– Monitor inspection technology development

 Results and industry OE will be evaluated by T

Force and reported to NSIAC semi-annually
Initiative Implementation Stat

 Report to NEI in January and July of each ye Each plant will report

– Progress on each of the 6 milestone dates– All active deviations from elements of the Init

All active deviations from elements of the Init
Initiative Implementation Stat

 Implementations status will be reported 

follows:

– Implementation date will not be met or 

not met

– Implementation by expected date is at 

– Implementation is on schedule– Implementation is complete

 Explanation of any missed or at risk 

implementation dates is requested
Deviations

 Deviation justification is required for inability 

conform with any aspect of the Initiative

– Approval by company executive

 Report all deviations to Initiative elements se

annually – Include • Element not being met • Summary of reason and justification
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Medical International Technology, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michel Bayouk, Secretary and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|   

|\s\
|---

|Michel Bayouk
|-------------

|Michel BayoukSecretary and Principal Accounting OfficerDecember 30, 2005
|------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
#### § 802.60 Acquisitions by securities underwriters.

An acquisition of voting securities by a person acting as a securities underwriter, in the ordinary course of business, and in the process of underwriting, shall be exempt from the requirements of the act.
§ 1502.5 Initiation of a hearing involving the issuance, amendment, or revocation of a regulation. ( a ) The Federal Register notice promulgating the final regulation will describe how to submit objections and requests for hearing.
( b ) On or before the 30th day after the date of publication of a final regulation in the Federal Register, a person may file written objections, with or without a request for a hearing, with the Commission. The 30-day period may not be extended, except that additional information supporting an objection may be received after 30 days upon a showing of inadvertent omission or for other good cause shown, if consideration of the additional information will not delay review of the objection and request for hearing.
§ 1253.2 Determinations for unfinished manufactured fibers. ( a ) The following definition for an unfinished manufactured fiber applies for this part 1253. An unfinished manufactured fiber is one that has no chemical additives beyond those required to manufacture the fiber. For unfinished manufactured fibers as defined in this rule, the unfinished manufactured fiber is free of any chemical additives added to impart color or some desirable performance property, such as flame retardancy.
( b ) The following unfinished manufactured fibers do not exceed the ASTM F963 elements solubility limits set forth in 16 CFR part 1250 with a high degree of assurance as that term is defined in 16 CFR part 1107: ( 1 ) Nylon;
( 2 ) Polyurethane (Spandex);
( 3 ) Viscose Rayon;
( 4 ) Acrylic and Modacrylic; and
( 5 ) Natural Rubber Latex.
( c ) The following unfinished manufactured fibers do not exceed the phthalates content limits set forth in 16 CFR part 1307 with a high degree of assurance as that term is defined in 16 CFR part 1107: ( 1 ) Polyester (polyethylene terephthalate, PET);
( 2 ) Nylon;
( 3 ) Polyurethane (Spandex);
( 4 ) Viscose Rayon;
( 5 ) Acrylic and Modacrylic; and
( 6 ) Natural Rubber Latex.
( d ) Accessible component parts of children's toys and child care articles made with the unfinished manufactured fibers, listed in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section are not required to be third-party tested pursuant to section 14(a)(2) of the CPSA and 16 CFR part 1107.
( e ) Accessible component parts of children's toys and child care articles made with manufactured fibers not listed in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section are required to be third party tested pursuant to section 14(a)(2) of the CPSA and 16 CFR part 1107.
#### Thomas M. Buil, Respondent, v Jenny R. LePrell et al., Appellants.

[821 NYS2d 141]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John A. Michalek, J.), entered December 14, 2005 in a personal injury action. The order denied defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of negligence.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Green, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 230 (Wednesday, December 1, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 69925]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26458]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies; Correction

    This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc. 04-25773) published on page 
67913 of the issue for Monday, November 22, 2004.
    Under the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City heading, the entry 
for Embry W. Williams, Jr., Amarillo, Texas, is revised to read as 
follows:
    1. Embry W. Williams, Jr., Amarillo, Texas; Embry W. Williams, III, 
Richardson, Texas; and James David Williams, Kerrville, Texas; to 
acquire voting shares of Union Bancshares, Inc., Clayton, New Mexico, 
and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of The First National Bank 
of New Mexico, Clayton, New Mexico.
    Comments on this application must be received by December 6, 2004.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 26, 
2004.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 04-26458 Filed 11-30-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed April 28, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D20-1412 Lower Tribunal No. F04-22267

________________ Cordero Otistroy Blair, Appellant, vs. The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose L. Fernandez, Judge. Cordero Otistroy Blair, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Linda Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before SCALES, MILLER and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.