alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.5

 

 

225 Franklin Street

18th Floor

Boston, MA 02110

T 877.526.3562

ngkf.com

 

Officer’s Certificate

Pursuant to the requirements of the applicable Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule I hereto, for which KeyBank Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, and Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/a Newmark Knight Frank, as Sub-Servicer, the undersigned, Ronald Steffenino, a Senior Managing Director of Servicing  and Asset Management of Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/a Newmark Knight Frank, hereby certifies subject to any limitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, solely in his capacity as an officer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:

|   | 1. | A review of the Primary Servicer’s activities during the preceding fiscal year or portion thereof (the “Reporting Period”) and of the Primary Servicer’s performance under this Agreement, has been made under my supervision; and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Primary Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Dated:   January 31, 2020

 

 

 

Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/a

Newmark Knight Frank

 

 

 

/s/ Ronald Steffenino

______________________________

Ronald Steffenino

Senior Managing Director

Servicing and Asset Management

 

 

 

 

BPC d/b/a NKF Primary Servicer for KeyBank

----

 

 

 

 

 

Schedule I

 

Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates; Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/a Newmark Knight Frank as Primary Servicer:

 

Series 2014 FL1

Series 2019 CF1

BPC d/b/a NKF Primary Servicer for KeyBank
§ 1500.272 Costs chargeable in connection with relabeling and reconditioning inadmissible imports. The cost of supervising the relabeling or other action necessary in connection with an import of a hazardous substance that fails to comply with the act shall be paid by the owner or consignee who files an application requesting such action and executes a bond, pursuant to section 14(b) of the act. The cost of such supervision shall include, but not be restricted to, the following: ( a ) Travel expenses of the supervising officer.
( b ) Per diem in lieu of subsistence of the supervising officer when away from his home station as provided by law.
( c ) Services of the supervising officer, to be calculated at the rate of a GS 11, step 1 employee, except that such services performed by a customs officer and subject to the provisions of the Act of February 13, 1911, as amended (sec. 5, 36 Stat. 901 as amended; 19 U.S.C. 267), shall be calculated as provided in that Act.
( d ) Services of the analyst, to be calculated at the rate of a GS 12, step 1 employee (which shall include the use of the chemical laboratories and equipment of the Consumer Product Safety Commission).
( e ) The minimum charge for services of supervising officers and of analysts shall be not less than the charge for 1 hour, and time after the first hour shall be computed in multiples of 1 hour, disregarding fractional parts less than one-half hour.
[38 FR 27012, Sept. 27, 1973, as amended at 57 FR 28605, June 26, 1992]
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 89 FR 71805, Sept. 4, 2024.

§ 1.58 Gross collection of exchange-set margins. ( a ) Each futures commission merchant which carries a commodity futures or commodity option position for another futures commission merchant or for a foreign broker on an omnibus basis must collect, and each futures commission merchant and foreign broker for which an omnibus account is being carried must deposit, initial and maintenance margin on each position reported in accordance with § 17.04 of this chapter at a level no less than that established for customer accounts by the rules of the applicable contract market.
( b ) If the futures commission merchant which carries a commodity futures or commodity option position for another futures commission merchant or for a foreign broker on an omnibus basis allows a position to be margined as a spread position or as a hedged position in accordance with the rules of the applicable contract market, the carrying futures commission merchant must obtain and retain a written representation from the futures commission merchant or from the foreign broker for which the omnibus account is being carried that each such position is entitled to be so margined.
[61 FR 19187, May 1, 1996]
# L_2020006EN.01000301.xml

| 10.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 6/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 6/3

---

Information concerning the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and the Government of the Republic of Azerbaijan on certain aspects of air services

The Agreement between the European Community and the Government of the Republic of Azerbaijan on certain aspects of air services, signed in Strasbourg on 7 July 2009, entered into force on 17 December 2010, in accordance with Article 8(1) of the Agreement, as the last notification was deposited on 17 December 2010.

---
### §11048. Regulations

The Administrator may prescribe such regulations as may be necessary to carry out this chapter.

(Pub. L. 99–499, title III, §328, Oct. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 1757.)
#### Fanny Rubin, Respondent, v. Irving G. Rubin, Appellant.

Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously reversed, without costs; plaintiff is allowed temporary alimony of $85 a week and counsel fee of $400 and the parties are directed to proceed without delay to final determination of the issues remaining in the action. Settle order on notice. Present — Peek, P. J, Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Yoorhis, JJ«
(July 9, 1953.)

(Republish.)

#### In the Matter of the General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Dorland, Inc., Assignor, to Thomas E. Zoda et al., Assignees, Respondents. Ernest Davids, Appellant.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs. The examination is to proceed on July 15, 1953, at the hour and place fixed iñ the order appealed from, and the order of this court, entered July 7, 1953, vacated. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Breitel, JJ. [See *ante,*pp. 664, 759.]
#### § 460.22 R-value claims for non-insulation products.

If you make an R-value claim for a product, other than a fenestration-related product, that is not home insulation and is marketed in whole or in part to reduce residential energy use by slowing heat flow, you must test the product pursuant to § 460.5 using a test or tests in that section appropriate to the product. Any advertised R-value claims must fairly reflect the results of those tests. For the purposes of this section, fenestration-related products include windows, doors, and skylights as well as attachments for those products.

[84 FR 20790, May 13, 2019]
§ 1031.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This part 1031 sets forth the Consumer Product Safety Commission's guidelines and requirements on participating in the activities of voluntary standards bodies. Subpart A sets forth general policies on Commission involvement, and subpart B sets forth policies and guidelines on employee involvement in voluntary standards activities. Subpart C sets forth the criteria governing public review and comment on staff involvement in voluntary standards activities.
( b ) For purposes of both subpart A and subpart B of this part 1031, voluntary standards bodies are private sector domestic or multinational organizations or groups, or combinations thereof, such as, but not limited to, all non-profit organizations, industry associations, professional and technical societies, institutes, and test laboratories, that are involved in the planning, development, establishment, revision, review or coordination of voluntary standards. Voluntary standards development bodies are voluntary standards bodies, or their sub-groups, that are devoted to developing or establishing voluntary standards.
Exhibit 31.1 

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, John J. Sherman, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Inergy Holdings, L.P.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 9, 2005
December 7, 2016

Mr. David C. Hook Planehook Aviation Services, LLC

6010 Windham Drive San Antonio, TX 78239

Dear Mr. Hook :

Thank you for your 10/05/2016 email on behalf of Planehook Aviation Services, LLC (hereinafter petitioner or operator) requesting the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

cancel Exemption No

. 14695 (Docket No. FAA

– 2015

– 4858 )

.

In Exemption No

. 14695 , the operator was granted an exemption from 14 CFR §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b), to the extent necessary to allow the petitioner to conduct UAS operations

.

Your request for cancellation is hereby granted, effective 12/7/2016

.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan Director, Flight Standards Service
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

muiteb ~tate~ (!Court of ~peaI~

for tbe jfeberaI (!Circuit

MARTIN GARDNER REIFFIN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION,

WILLIAM H. GATES, III, AND STEVEN A.

BALLMER,

Defendants-Appellees.

2012-1357

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of California in case no.11-CV-3505,

Judge Charles R. Breyer.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Martin Reiffin moves without opposition for leave to

file a corrected reply brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

Case: 12-1357 Document: 28 Page: 1 Filed: 10/31/2012
MARTIN REIFFIN V. MICROSOFT CORPORATION

IT Is ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted.

FOR THE COURT

lsI Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

s27

2

Case: 12-1357 Document: 28 Page: 2 Filed: 10/31/2012
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09
- 19
- 00117
- CV

__________________
IN RE JASON LEE WHITNEY

__________________________________________________________________ Original Proceeding 279th District Court of Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. F
- 227,594

__________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Jason Lee Whitney filed a petition for a writ of mandamus and a motion for temporary relief. See Tex. R. App. P. 52. Relator complains that the trial court granted a traditional motion for partial summary judgment on claims r elator brought against the real party in interest, Jessica Garth Whitney, failed to compel depositions, and denied a motion for continuance of the trial. After reviewing the petition and the mandamus record, we conclude that the relator has not established that he has no adequate remedy by appeal. See In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. , 148 S.W.3d 124,2 135

- 36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proce eding) . Accordingly, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus and the motion for temporary relief. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
PETITION DENIED.
PER CURIAM Submitted on April 16, 2019 Opinion Delivered April 16, 2019 Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
#### Edwin C. Smith and Another, Respondents, v. Frederick A. Brotsch, Jr., and Claribel Bergener Brotsch, Appellants, Impleaded with Others.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concurred.
Amendment to Verid, Inc. 2006 Incentive Compensation Plan



 Exhibit 10.3 
 AMENDMENT 
 TO 
 VERID, INC. 
 2006 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN 
 June 1, 2007 
 In accordance with
resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors of Verid, Inc. on May 24, 2007, the 2006 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) is amended as follows: 
 The Plan is hereby amended to add a new Section 9(a)(v) as follows: 
 “(v) To the extent an Option
is assumed or substituted for by the successor company upon a Change in Control, if the Participant is an Employee and the Participant’s employment is terminated by the Company, the successor company or its affiliates without Cause within
twelve (12) months following the Change in Control, then such Option shall become fully vested and exercisable as of the date of the Participant’s termination of employment.”
Faulk, Scott (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Aloha, 

Mike Heacock <emheacock@hotmail.com> 

Friday, November 08, 2013 9:34 PM 

EAS (OST) 

EAS Kalaupapa ... ;; _., 

~- -~:. ..·--·. ·< i j 

I am writing in support of awarding a 4 year EAS to Makani Kai Air Charter. The service provided has been 

outstanding. The pricing is fair and the schedule has been adjusted with input from the community residents 

and workers. Makani Kai has made it simple and convenient for the workers who reside "topside" to get to 

work. The ease of traveling without having to transit a busy commuter terminal is priceless. The personalized 

service such knowing the names of frequent travelers and the needs of our elderly fliers will likely not be 

duplicated by any other carrier. Such personal attention is held in high esteem by our community. 

I have reviewed the proposal from the three other bidders and cannot see how they can match the service 

provided by Makani Kai. The negligible difference in cost between Makani Kai and Mokulele should not be a 

factor. Upon closer review Mokulele will have a baggage fee and likely other fees such as reservation changes. 

This in itself will cause much dismay among the residents and workers who utilize Makani Kai. For those who 

live topside and fly to work the lack of fees is invaluable. The changing of flights and the liberal baggage policy 

allows necessary and comfort items to be brought without being financially penalized. 

I hope this letter conveys the strong connection Makani Kai has developed with our community. I do not 

believe there is a resident or worker who has ever had a negative experience during the time Makani Kai has 

been providing service. Bearing this in mind along with the established schedule and fare structure it is 

apparant that Makani Kai should remain our carrier. 

Mahala for taking the time to read this. I may be contacted via this email address. 

Regards, 

Edward M. Heacock 

Resident of Kalaupapa. 

1
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE****SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Darryl K. Horne, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Spectrum Sciences & Software HoldingsCorp.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the issuer and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the issuer’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.5. The issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and theaudit committee of issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.     By: /s/ Darryl K. Horne       Darryl K. HornePresident and Chief Executive OfficerSpectrum Sciences & Software Holdings Corp.Date:December 23, 2005
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECURITIES ACT RULES 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14(a)

I,
Jon E. Kirchner, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of DTS, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: August 8, 2008By:

/s/JON E. KIRCHNERJon E. Kirchner President and Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks