alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Caroline Roman, Appellant, against Leviton Manufacturing Co. Inc., et al., Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Claimant was employed as a porcelain cleaner. She was exposed to silicate dust. On August 26,1946, she left the employment because of ill health due to stomach ulcers. She returned the following month to have an X ray taken at the plant. This X ray seems to have been taken at claimant’s request and was given to claimant and later returned to the employer. The employer during this period took a number of X rays of employees and made statistical studies of them, but there is no proof that the employer knew of the specific technical reading of the X ray of this claimant. The X ray showed changes which would have been *“*consistent with ” mild silicosis. The record does not, however, require a finding by the board that the employer actually had such knowledge of the X-ray interpretation to impose a duty under section 110 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, to notify all interested parties and report to the board; and no such finding has been made. Claimant was in a hospital in September, 1946, and her condition was there diagnosed as tuberculosis and she was treated for this condition until 1949, but a diagnosis of silicosis was *919not made until 1950. The claim was filed March 2, 1950. This was over three years after she left the employment in August, 1946, and hence had her last exposure to silicate. The board held that the claim was barred under section 28 since it was not filed within two years. It held that the statute had not been waived. It is argued by claimant that the X ray taken in September, 1946, was an advance payment of compensation which stopped the running of the Statute of Limitations, but the statistical studies of employees for which it was to be used and other circumstances surrounding it did not require the board to find that it was such an advance payment of compensation. Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Imrie and Zeller, JJ.
#### § 304.4 Application of other law or regulation.

The provisions of these regulations are in addition to, and not in substitution for or limitation of, the provisions of any other law or regulation of the United States (including the existing statutes and regulations prohibiting the reproduction of genuine currency) or of the law or regulation of any State.
UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 

April 22, 2016 

 IN RESPONSE, PLEASE 

REFER TO: M160419 

MEMORANDUM TO: Victor M. McCree 

 Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Richard J. Laufer, Acting Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS – MEETING WITH THE 

ORGANIZATION OF AGREEMENT STATES (OAS) AND THE 

CONFERENCE OF RADIATION CONTROL PROGRAM 

DIRECTORS (CRCPD), 9:30 A.M., TUESDAY, APRIL 19, 2016, 

COMMISSIONERS’ CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE WHITE FLINT 

NORTH, ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND (OPEN TO PUBLIC 

ATTENDANCE) 

The Commission was briefed by representatives of the Organization of Agreement States (OAS) 

and the Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors (CRCPD) on a number of topics, 

including Status of Part 37 Implementation/Source Security Measures, Web-based Licensing 

Implementation, Nationwide Environmental Data Sharing for Foreign and Domestic Incidents, 

Financial Planning and Sealed Sources, and NRC/OAS Training and Webinars. 

There were no requirements identified for staff action. 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA 

 OIG 

 OPA 

 O.D.s, R.A.s, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR
§ 303.20 Registered identification numbers. ( a ) Registered numbers for use as the required identification in lieu of the name on textile fiber product labels, as provided in section 4(b)(3) of the Act, will be issued by the Commission to qualified persons residing in the United States upon receipt of an application duly executed on the Commission's Web site at *https://rn.ftc.gov* or by such means as the Commission or its designee may direct.
( b ) ( 1 ) Registered identification numbers shall be used only by the person or concern to whom they are issued, and such numbers are not transferable or assignable.
( 2 ) Registered identification numbers shall be subject to cancellation whenever any such number was procured or has been used improperly or contrary to the requirements of the Acts administered by the Federal Trade Commission, and regulations promulgated thereunder, or when otherwise deemed necessary in the public interest.
( 3 ) Registered identification numbers shall be subject to cancellation if the Commission fails to receive prompt notification of any change in name, business address, or legal business status of a person or firm to whom a registered identification number has been assigned, by application duly executed on the Commission's Web site at *https://rn.ftc.gov* or by such means as the Commission or its designee may direct.
( c ) Registered identification numbers assigned under this section may be used on labels required in labeling products subject to the provisions of the Wool Products Labeling Act and Fur Products Labeling Act, and numbers previously assigned by the Commission under such Acts may be used as and for the required name in labeling under this Act. When so used by the person or firm to whom assigned, the use of the numbers shall be construed as identifying and binding the applicant as fully and in all respects as though assigned under the specific Act for which it is used.
( d ) Requests for a registered identification number, to update information pertaining to an existing number, or to cancel an existing number shall be made through the Commission's Web site at *https://rn.ftc.gov .* Unless otherwise directed by the Commission or its designee, requests made by other means (including but not limited to email) will not be accepted and approved.
[82 FR 43692, Sept. 19, 2017]
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Mario Puma, Appellant, against J. Vernel Jackson, as Warden of Clinton Prison, Respondent.

Motion for reargument, or in the alternative for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, denied, without costs. Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Imrie, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 1089.]
EXHIBIT 32.1


Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer


of CNA Financial Corporation


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350


(As adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of CNA Financial Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:


|  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|• | the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2013filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|  |                                                                                                                                                     
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|• | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:February 19, 2014By/s/ Thomas F. MotamedThomas F. MotamedChief Executive Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
§ 803.3 Statement of reasons for noncompliance. A complete response shall be supplied to each item on the Notification and Report Form and to any request for additional information pursuant to section 7A(e) and § 803.20. Whenever the person filing notification is unable to supply a complete response, that person shall provide, for each item for which less than a complete response has been supplied, a statement of reasons for noncompliance. The statement of reasons for noncompliance shall contain all information upon which a person relies in explanation of its noncompliance and shall include at least the following: ( a ) Why the person is unable to supply a complete response;
( b ) What information, and what specific documents or categories of documents, would have been required for a complete response;
( c ) Who, if anyone, has the required information, and specific documents or categories of documents; and a description of all efforts made to obtain such information and documents, including the names of persons who searched for required information and documents, and where the search was conducted. If no such efforts were made, provide an explanation of the reasons why, and a description of all efforts necessary to obtain required information and documents;
( d ) Where noncompliance is based on a claim of privilege, a statement of the claim of privilege and all facts relied on in support thereof, including the identity of each document, its author, the author's title/position, addressee, the addressee's title/position, date, subject matter, all recipients of the original and of any copies, the recipients' titles/positions, the document's present location, and who has control of it.
[48 FR 34439, July 29, 1983, as amended at 81 FR 60259, Sept. 1, 2016]
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed May 15, 2024.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D23-1079

Lower Tribunal No. F99-5569B

Deavon Guilford,

Appellant, 

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Zachary 

James, Judge.

Ana M. Davide, P.A., and Ana M. Davide, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and David Llanes, Assistant Attorney 

General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, SCALES and GORDO, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
§ 923.91 State responsibility. ( a ) Applications for program grants are required to be submitted by the Governor of a participating state or by the head of the state entity designated by the Governor pursuant to subsection 306(d)(6) of the Act.
( b ) In the case of a section 305 grant, the application must designate a single state agency or entity to receive development grants and to be responsible for development of the State's coastal management program. The designee need not be that entity designated by the Governor pursuant to subsection 306(d)(6) of the Act as a single agency to receive and administer implementation grants.
( c ) One State application will cover all program activities for which program development or implementation funds under this Act and matching State funds are provided, irrespective of whether these activities will be carried out by State agencies, areawide or regional agencies, local governments, or interstate entities.
( d ) The designated state entity shall be fiscally responsible for all expenditures made under the grant, including expenditures by subgrantees and contractors.
| **LEASES (Narrative) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions** | 12 Months Ended |
|----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|
||
| **Leases [Abstract]**                                    |            |   |   |
| Remaining lease terms                                    | 11 years        |   |   |
| Rent expense                                             |            | $ 72 | $ 86 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Lessee, Remaining Lease Term
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**clx_LesseeRemainingLeaseTerm**Namespace Prefix:**clx_**Data Type:**xbrli:durationItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Amount of rent expense incurred for leased assets, including but not limited to, furniture and equipment, that is not directly or indirectly associated with the manufacture, sale or creation of a product or product line.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_LeaseAndRentalExpense**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**debit**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_LeasesAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
§ 1702.7 Justification for the exemption. The justification for the exemption, required under § 1702.3, shall explain the reason for the exemption based on one or more of the following grounds: ( a ) If the justification is based on a lack of need for special packaging to protect young children from serious injury or illness from the substance, the justification shall state how the lack of toxicity and lack of adverse human experience for the substance clearly supports granting the exemption.
( b ) If the exemption is requested because special packaging is not technologically feasible, practicable, or appropriate for the substance, the justification shall explain why.
( c ) If the exemption is requested because special packaging is incompatible with the particular substance, the justification shall explain why.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Systematic Radiological Assessment of Exemptions for Source and Byproduct Materials (NUREG-1717)

On this page:
        - Disclaimer
        - Publication Information
        -  Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1717 (PDF - 3.1 MB)

## Disclaimer

Subsequent to the publication of NUREG-1717, the zirconium industry provided additional data on particle size and occupancy times. They stated that facilities which handle and process zircon flours are rather dusty environments with a distribution of particle sizes which are typically 5 μm or greater. Although this was acknowledged in the text of the NUREG, the original calculations in NUREG-1717 were done using a particle size of 1μm (which is consistent with the ICRP recommendations on which 10 CFR Part 20 and Federal Guidance Report 11 are based) and occupancy times of 2000 hours, essentially full time. Increasing the particle size to 5 μm or higher decreases the dose and using a typical worker occupancy time of 20% would further decrease the dose. The NRC realizes that a typical average worker dose would be much lower than the worst case most conserative high dose presented in the NUREG. The agency will not use the results presented in NUREG-1717 as a sole basis for any regulatory decisions or future rulemaking without additional analysis.

## Publication Information

 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report is an assessment of potential radiation doses associated with the current exemptions from licensing for the majority of Part 30 byproduct and Parts 40 and 70 source material in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). Doses were estimated for the normal life cycle of a particular product or material, covering distribution and transport, intended or expected routine use, and disposal using the ICRP 26 and 30 dose assessment methodology, which was incorporated into the current requirements of 10 CFR Part 20 in May 1991. In addition, assessments of potential doses due to accidents and misuse were estimated. Also presented is an assessment of potential radiological impacts associated with selected products containing byproduct material which currently may be used under a general or specific license and may be candidates for exemption from licensing requirements.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
County Maps 

For 

North Dakota, Minnesota and South Dakota
North Dakota QuickFacts from the US Census Bureau Page 1 of 1 

State & County QuickFacts 

North Dakota County Selection Map 

CASS f, 

PEMBINA 

WALSH 

BARNES 

DICKEY 

LAMOURE 

CAVAUER 

EDDY 

FOSTER I GRIGGS I STEELE. I TRAILL 

snrrSMAN 

TOWNER 

LOGAN 

MciNTOSH 

WELLS 

KIDDER 

ROlEITE 

I RANSOM I 

EMMONS, 'I 1RICHLAND 

SARGENT 

SHERIDAN 

BOTTINEAU 

WARD 

GRANT 

McLEAN 

MERC;\ 

ADAMS 

DUNN 

HfITlNGER 

DIVIDE 

McKENZIE 

STARK 

BIlliNGS OLIVER ,_.-r--lr--...L...__) 

WillIAMS 

SLOPE 

BOWMAN 

http://quickfacts.censlls.gov/qfdlmaps/north_dakota_map.html 1/8/2010 
Minnesota County Map	 Page 2 of 4 

N 

o 

R 

T 

H 

D 

A 

K 

o 

T 

A 

s 

o 

U 

T 

H 

D 

A 

K 

o 

T 

A 

Minnesota Counties 

.' Aitkin County 

• Anoka County 

• Becker County 

'. Beltrami County 

lAKE ST.lOUIS 

CARLTON AITKIN 

CANADA TO THE NORTH 

ITASCA 

KOOCHICHING 

CROW 

WING 

CASS 

BELTRAMI 

TODD 

POPE 

DOUGWl 

BECKER 

ROSEAU 

OTTER TAIL 

YEllOW MEDICINE T ..., 

~. ~I

MARSHALL 

PIPESTONEI MURRAY 

ROCK I NOBLES I JACKSON I MARTIN IFARIBAULTIFREEBORN 

ClAY 

sPENN:P­ RED 

l\ 

NOIiMAN TMAHN-~ \' h/

OM~ I ?;

,,, 

KJITSON 

IOWA TO THE SOUTH 

US Map Collection 1513-1990 

• McLeod County 

• Mahnomen County 

•	 Marshall County 

lat Maos 

County Finder 

• Dodge County 

• Douglas County 

• Faribault County 

• Fillmore County 

http://www.censusfinder.com/maprnn.htm 

W
 

I
 

S
 

C
 

o 

N 

S 

I
 

N
 

T 

o 

T 

H
 

E
 

E
 

A
 

S
 

T
 

• Roseau County 

• St Louis County 

• Scott County 

• Sherburne County 

1/8/2010 
South Dakota County Map Page 2 of4 

NORTH DAKOTA TO THE NORTH M MONTANA 

IS
 

NW
 

w 

y 

o 

M 

I 

N 

G 

I 

S 

W 

E 

S 

T 

South Dakota Counties 

• Aurora County 

• Beadle County 

• Bennett County 

• Bon Homme County 

I 

S 

E 

S 

o 

T 

A 

E 

A 

S 

T 

MINER I lAKE IMOODY 

, I~"i'¥¥-' OJ IOWA 

IS 

SE 

DAY 

DEUEL 

HAMUN 

I ! GRANT i L 

tOb~

ClARK I ~QIQ-t

BEADLE I KINGSBURY IBROOKINGS 

SPINK 

BROWN 

DOUGlAS 

AURORA I gl/~1 IMINNEHAHA $ I McCOOK F 

HAND 

BRULE 

FAULK 

EDMUNDS 

McPHERSON 

HYDE 

TRIPP 

LYMAN 

POTTER 

SUllY 

TODD 

JONES 

MEUfTTE 

DEWEY 

STANLEY -. 

CORSON 

NEBRASKA TO THE SOUTH 

HMKON 

JACJ(SON 

BENNEn 

ZIEBACH 

i 

I-­ I I SHANNON 

PERKJNS 

" 

MEADE 

'_--.if 

PENNINGTON 

BUTTE 

CUSTER 

FAlL RIVER 

HAROING 

• Faulk County 

• Grant County 

• Gregory County 

• Haakon County 

County Finder US Map- Collection 1513·1990 

I
 

N
 

N 

• Meade County 

• Mellette County 

• Miner County 

• Minnehaha County 

http://www.censusfinder.com/mapsd.htm 1/8/2010
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, J. Leonard Ivins, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Oncolin
Therapeutics, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31,
2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such  Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Oncolin Therapeutics,
Inc.





Date:  May 5,
2010





By:
              /s/ J. Leonard
      IvinsJ. Leonard
      IvinsChief Executive
      Officer
§ 301.12 Country of origin of imported furs. ( a ) ( 1 ) In the case of furs imported into the United States from a foreign country, the country of origin of such furs shall be set forth as a part of the information required by the act in invoicing and advertising.
( 2 ) In the case of fur products imported into the United States from a foreign country, or fur products made from furs imported into the United States from a foreign country, the country of origin of the furs contained in such products shall be set forth as a part of the information required by the act in labeling, invoicing and advertising.
( b ) The term *country* means the political entity known as a nation. Colonies, possessions or protectorates outside the boundaries of the mother country shall be considered separate countries and the name thereof shall be deemed acceptable in designating the “country of origin” unless the Commission shall otherwise direct.
( c ) The country in which the animal producing the fur was raised, or if in a feral state, was taken, shall be considered the “country of origin.”
( d ) When furs are taken within the territorial waters of a country, such country shall be considered the “country of origin.” Furs taken outside such territorial waters, or on the high seas, shall have as their country of origin the country having the nearest mainland.
( e ) ( 1 ) The English name of the country of origin shall be used. Abbreviations which unmistakably indicate the name of a country, such as “Gt. Britain” for “Great Britain,” are acceptable. Abbreviations such as “N.Z.” for “New Zealand” are not acceptable.
( 2 ) The name of the country of origin, when used as a part of the required information in labeling shall be preceded by the term *fur origin;* as for example: Dyed Muskrat Fur Origin: Russia or Dyed China Mink Fur Origin: China
( 3 ) In addition to the required disclosure of country of origin the name of the country may also appear in adjective form in connection with the name of the animal; as for example: Tip-dyed Canadian American Sable Fur Origin: Canada or Russian Sable Fur Origin: Russia
( f ) Nothing in this section shall be construed as limiting in any way the information required to be disclosed on labels under the provisions of any Tariff Act of the United States or regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury.
[17 FR 6075, July 8, 1952, as amended at 26 FR 3186, Apr. 14, 1961; 61 FR 67709, Dec. 24, 1996]