alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1633.5 Prototype pooling and confirmation testing requirements. ( a ) *Prototype pooling.* One or more manufacturers may rely on a qualified prototype produced by another manufacturer or prototype developer provided that: ( 1 ) The prototype meets the requirements of § 1633.4;
( 2 ) The mattress sets being produced are the same as the qualified prototype with respect to materials, components, design and methods of assembly; and
( 3 ) The manufacturer producing mattress sets in reliance on a qualified prototype has performed a confirmation test on at least one (1) Specimen of the mattress set it produces in accordance with § 1633.7. The tested specimen must meet the criteria under § 1633.3(b) before any mattress sets based on the qualified prototype may be sold or introduced into commerce.
( b ) *Confirmation test failure.* ( 1 ) If the confirmation test specimen fails to meet the criteria of § 1633.3(b), the manufacturer thereof shall not sell any mattress set based on the same qualified prototype until that manufacturer takes corrective measures, tests a new specimen, and the new specimen meets the criteria of § 1633.3(b).
( 2 ) If a confirmation test specimen fails to meet the criteria of § 1633.3(b), the manufacturer thereof must notify the manufacturer of the prototype of the test failure.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 17, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), ANSI Accredited Standards Committee “C12” (“C12 Committee”), by its Secretariat, National Electrical Manufacturers Association (“NEMA”), has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: ANSI Accredited Standards Committee “C12”, Rosslyn, VA. The nature and scope of C12 Committee's standards development activities are: To develop and maintain American National Standards related to electricity meters. Currently, C12 Committee maintains 24 standards relating to electricity meters used in measuring the consumption of electricity. The standards developed by C12 Committee are published by NEMA.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-26622  Filed 12-02-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**  

**New Holland Credit Company, LLC**

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer ofNew Holland Credit Company, LLC (“NHCC”), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1,2019 (as amended from time to time, the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) by and among NHCC, CNH Capital Receivables LLC andCNH Equipment Trust 2019-B, does hereby certify that:

 

1.          NHCC is Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

 

2.          The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Indenture Trustee.

 

3.          This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 4.9(a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

 

4.          A review of the Servicer’s activities during the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2021 and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

  

5.          To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2021.

 

6.          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 30th day of March, 2022.

 

 

 

 

March 30, 2022
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 230 (Wednesday, December 1, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 69925]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26459]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec. [thinsp]225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board 
has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and 
permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than December 27, 2004.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Sue Costello, Vice President) 
1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30303:
    1. Firstrust Corporation, New Orleans, Louisiana; to acquire 
Central Bank of Savings, Winona, Mississippi, and thereby engage in 
operating a savings association, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(4)(ii) 
of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 26, 
2004.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 04-26459 Filed 11-30-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
EXECUTION COPY
 
  
 
 Re:
    
    Orion Futures Fund L.P.




---



##### 



Appointment of Agent
  Section 2. Representations and Warranties of the Partnership and the General
Partner.
   -2-




---



##### 



-3-




---



##### 



Representations and Warranties of Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Morgan
Stanley Smith Barney LLC
    -4-




---



##### 



-5-




---



##### 



Closings
  Covenants of the Partnership and the General Partner
   Appendix I provided however
  -6-




---



##### 



-7-




---



##### 



Acknowledgment of Payment of Compensation to You and Your Financial
Advisors
  Conditions of Your Obligations
    Conditions of the Obligations of the Partnership and the General
Partner
  -8-




---



##### 



Indemnification and Contribution
  Representations, Warranties and Agreements to Survive Delivery
  Confidentiality
  Notices and Authority to Act
  
  
 -9-




---



##### 



th th
  Parties
  Governing Law
  Waiver
  Entire Agreement
  Effective Date
  [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
 -10-




---



##### 



Sincerely,ORION FUTURES FUND L.P.By:
    Ceres Managed Futures LLC(General Partner)By:
    /s/ Jennifer MagroName:
    Jennifer MagroTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer and DirectorCERES MANAGED FUTURES LLCBy:
    /s/ Jennifer MagroName:
    Jennifer MagroTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer and Director  MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC
    
    
    
    CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC.By:
    
    /s/ Michael McGrath
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Laurie HessleinName:
    
    Michael McGrath
    
    
    
    
    
    Name:
    
    Laurie HessleinTitle:
    
    Managing Director
    
    
    
    
    
    Title:
    
    Managing Director
 -11-




---



##### 



APPENDIX I
 Blue Sky Memorandum
#### § 240.3 Definition of seller.

*Seller* includes any person (manufacturer, wholesaler, distributor, etc.) who sells products for resale, with or without further processing. For example, selling candy to a retailer is a sale for resale without processing. Selling corn syrup to a candy manufacturer is a sale for resale with processing.
#### BiBi Rakeeba Misir, Appellant, v Beach Haven Apartment No. 1, Inc., Respondent.

[820 NYS2d 892]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated July 18, 2005, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff allegedly fell when she walked through a pile of wet leaves approximately four feet wide on a driveway adjacent to the defendant’s building. The plaintiff claimed she had observed the pile of leaves upon exiting the defendant’s building and walking down the driveway on her way to a store approximately 20 minutes prior to her fall.

Upon returning from the store, the plaintiff walked in the pile and fell, allegedly sustaining injuries. The plaintiff also claimed that she saw the pile of leaves three days before the date that she fell.

The defendant made a prima facie showing that the complained-of condition was both open and obvious, i.e., readily observable by those employing the reasonable use of their senses, and not inherently dangerous *(see Cupo v Karfunkel,*1 AD3d 48 [2003]; *Sun Ho Chung v Jeong Sook Joh,*29 AD3d 677 [2006]; *Osborne v Village of N. Tarrytown,*180 App Div 224 [1917]; *Webber v Miller,*17 AD3d 352 [2005]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the pile of leaves constituted a dangerous condition or whether the pile was open and obvious. Accordingly, summary judgment was properly granted in favor of the defendant. Florio, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Lifson, JJ., concur. *[See*8 Misc 3d 1017(A), 2005 NY Slip Op 51129(U) (2005).]
No: III-15-006 March 25, 2015

CONTACT: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663

NRC to Discuss Performance of Clinton Nuclear Power Station April 1

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will be available on April 1 to discuss the agency’s 

annual safety performance of the Clinton Nuclear Power Station during the Clinton Area Chamber of 

Commerce and Tourism Bureau’s Business Expo. The expo is open to the public and will be held at 

Clinton High School, 1200 Highway 54, in Clinton from 4 to 7 p.m. The plant is located in Clinton, Ill., 

about 23 miles southeast of Bloomington, and is owned by Exelon Generation Co.

“We are trying something new by participating in the expo in order to have more conversations 

with people who live near the plant about what the NRC does,” said NRC Region III Administrator 

Cynthia D. Pederson. “We are looking forward to joining this community event and as always our 

inspectors will also be available to answer questions about the plants performance and NRC oversight.”

The annual assessment letter from the NRC Region III office addresses the plant’s performance

in 2014 and is available on the NRC website. Overall, the Clinton plant operated safely in 2014. 

The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess nuclear 

plant performance. The colors start with “green” and then go to “white,” “yellow,” or “red,” to denote 

the safety significance of the issues involved. Performance indicators are statistical measurements of 

plant and equipment performance. The NRC’s action matrix reflects overall plant performance and 

agency response. There are five columns in the matrix with Column 1 requiring a baseline level of 

inspections. A move to another column results in an increased level of NRC oversight and inspections. 

For the first quarter of 2014, the plant was in Column 2 of the action matrix due to a “white” 

performance indicator in the area of unplanned scrams that occurred in 2013. The NRC conducted a 

supplemental inspection to review the plant’s actions to correct the problem and found the plant had 

taken appropriate actions. In the second quarter, the plant had a greater-than-green security finding

which kept the plant in Column 2. Security details are not disclosed publicly but the issue was 

immediately addressed before the NRC inspectors left the site. The NRC’s supplemental inspection to 

review the security issue has been conducted and the report with results will be issued later in the year.

Routine inspections are conducted by two NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant and by 

inspection specialists from the Region III Office in Lisle, Ill., and the agency’s headquarters in 

Rockville, Md. Some of the performance areas to be inspected this year include radiation protection and

the independent spent fuel storage facility. The most current performance information for Clinton is 

available on the NRC website.
No: 14-006 February 10, 2014

CONTACT: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200 

NRC Approves Power Uprate for Fermi Nuclear Power Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved a request by DTE Electric Co. to increase 

the generating capacity of the Fermi nuclear power plant, Unit 2, by approximately 1.6 percent.

The NRC staff determined that DTE could safely increase the reactor’s output primarily through 

more accurate means of measuring feedwater flow. NRC staff also reviewed the company’s evaluations 

showing that the plant’s design can accommodate the increased power level.

The NRC’s safety evaluation of the plant’s proposed power uprate focuses on several areas, 

including the nuclear steam supply system, instrumentation and control systems, electrical systems, 

accident evaluations, radiological consequences, fire protection, operations and training, testing, and 

technical specification changes.

The power uprate for Fermi Unit 2, a boiling water reactor located approximately 25 miles 

northeast of Toledo, Ohio, will increase the unit’s generating capacity from approximately 1,179 to 

1,198 megawatts electric. DTE intends to implement the uprate during the current refueling outage. 

The NRC published a notice about the uprate application in the Federal Register on June 11, 

2013. The staff’s evaluation of the uprate application will available through the NRC’s ADAMS online 

documents database by entering Accession Number ML13364A131.
### §14043e. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 14043e was editorially reclassified as section 12471 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
# Cover

# Table 1

# Table 2

# Table 2a

# Table 2b

# Table 2c

# Symbols

# Historical Note
1... See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-09-156-CV

TCAP CORPORATION F/K/A APPELLANT

TRANSAMERICAN CAPITAL

CORPORATION

V.

GEORGE GERVIN APPELLEE

----------

FROM THE 16TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered appellant’s “Motion To Dismiss Appeal.” It is the

court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ. 

DELIVERED: June 25, 2009
No. 16-010 March 1, 2016

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200

ASLB to Hold Mandatory Hearing March 24 in Rockville, Md.

on Southern N.J. Early Site Permit Application 

The Atomic Safety and Licensing Board will conduct a mandatory hearing Thursday, March 24, 

on an application for an Early Site Permit (ESP) at a site adjacent to the Salem and Hope Creek nuclear 

power plants in Salem County, N.J. This hearing marks the final step in the Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission’s ESP review process. The board is the independent body within the NRC that conducts 

adjudicatory hearings and renders decisions on legal challenges to licensing actions.

The mandatory hearing will include testimony and exhibits from applicants PSEG Power, LLC,

and PSEG Nuclear, LLC (PSEG), as well as NRC staff, on whether the staff’s environmental and safety

reviews adequately support the findings necessary to issue the permit.

The hearing will begin at 9 a.m. on March 24 in the Board’s Hearing Room at NRC 

Headquarters, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md. Members of the public and media are welcome to 

observe the hearing, but participation will be limited to the parties, lawyers and witnesses. Those 

planning to attend should arrive at least 15 minutes early to allow time for security screening, including 

searches of hand-carried items such as briefcases or backpacks.

Interested members of the public may submit written comments. These statements are not 

testimony or evidence, but may aid the board and the parties in considering the issues in the hearing. 

Written statements should be submitted to hearing.docket@nrc.gov before March 24.

An ESP allows an applicant to address site-related issues, such as environmental impacts, for 

possible future construction and operation of a nuclear power plant at the site. PSEG submitted the 

application on May 25, 2010. If approved, the permit would be valid for up to 20 years while PSEG 

decides whether to request an NRC license to build and operate a reactor at the site. More information 

on the PSEG ESP review is available on the NRC website.
### §151105. Powers

The corporation may—

(1) adopt and amend bylaws;

(2) adopt and alter a corporate seal;

(3) acquire, own, lease, encumber, and transfer property to carry out the purposes of the corporation;

(4) accept and administer a trust for educational purposes;

(5) borrow money, issue instruments of indebtedness, and secure its obligations by granting security interests in its property; and

(6) sue and be sued in any court of the United States, or other court of competent jurisdiction.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1398.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 151105 | 36:5303. | June 30, 1906, ch. 3929, §3, 34 Stat. 805; June 30, 1969, Pub. L. 91–37, §1(a), 83 Stat. 42. |
| | 36:5309. | June 30, 1906, ch. 3929, §9, 34 Stat. 807. |

Section

In this section, the text of 36:5309 is omitted as executed and obsolete.

In clause (1), the words "adopt and amend" are substituted for "make" for consistency in the revised title. The words "not inconsistent with the provisions of this chapter or of the Constitution of the United States" are omitted as unnecessary.

In clause (2), the words "adopt and alter a corporate seal" are substituted for "have and to use a common seal, and to alter and change the same at its pleasure" for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary words.

Clause (3) is substituted for "take or receive, whether by gift, grant, devise, bequest, or purchase, any real or personal estate, and to hold, grant, transfer, sell, convey, hire, or lease the same for the purpose of its incorporation" for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary words.

In clause (4), the words "of real or personal estate" and "within the objects of the corporation" are omitted as unnecessary.

In clause (5), the words "for its corporate purposes" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "instruments of indebtedness" are substituted for "bonds therefor", and the words "secure its obligations by granting security interests in its property" are substituted for "secure the same by mortgage, deed of trust, pledge, or otherwise", for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary words.
#### § 301.33 Labeling of samples.

Where samples of furs or fur products subject to the act are used to promote or effect sales of fur products, said samples, as well as the fur products purchased therefrom, shall be labeled to show the information required under the act and regulations.
### **CHAPTER 67—CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT AND ADOPTION REFORM**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL PROGRAM

Sec.
5101.
Office on Child Abuse and Neglect.
5102.
Advisory board on child abuse and neglect.
5103.
Repealed.
5104.
National clearinghouse for information relating to child abuse.
5105.
Research and assistance activities.
5106.
Grants to States, Indian tribes or tribal organizations, and public or private agencies and organizations.
5106a.
Grants to States for child abuse or neglect prevention and treatment programs.
5106a–1, 5106b. Repealed.
5106c.
Grants to States for programs relating to investigation and prosecution of child abuse and neglect cases.
5106d.
Miscellaneous requirements relating to assistance.
5106e.
Coordination of child abuse and neglect programs.
5106f.
Reports.
5106f–1.
Report concerning voluntary reporting system.
5106g.
Definitions.
5106h.
Authorization of appropriations.
5106i.
Rule of construction.
5107.
Discretionary programs; authorization of appropriations.
5108.
Monitoring and oversight.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—ADOPTION OPPORTUNITIES

5111.
Congressional findings and declaration of purpose.
5112.
Repealed.
5113.
Information and services.
5114.
Study and report of unlicensed or unregulated adoption placements.
5115.
Authorization of appropriations.
5115a.
Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—COMMUNITY–BASED GRANTS FOR THE PREVENTION OF CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT

5116.
Purpose and authority.
5116a.
Eligibility.
5116b.
Amount of grant.
5116c.
Repealed.
5116d.
Application.
5116e.
Local program requirements.
5116f.
Performance measures.
5116g.
National network for community-based family resource programs.
5116h.
Definitions.
5116i.
Authorization of appropriations.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—TEMPORARY CHILD CARE FOR CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES AND CRISIS NURSERIES

5117 to 5117d. Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV–A—ABANDONED INFANTS ASSISTANCE

5117aa to 5117aa–22. Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER V—CERTAIN PREVENTIVE SERVICES REGARDING CHILDREN OF HOMELESS FAMILIES OR FAMILIES AT RISK OF HOMELESSNESS

5118 to 5118e. Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER VI—CHILD ABUSE CRIME INFORMATION AND BACKGROUND CHECKS

5119 to 5119c. Transferred.