alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 930.1 Overall objectives. The objectives of this part are: ( a ) To describe the obligations of all parties who are required to comply with the federal consistency requirement of the Coastal Zone Management Act;
( b ) To implement the federal consistency requirement in a manner which strikes a balance between the need to ensure consistency for federal actions affecting any coastal use or resource with the enforceable policies of approved management programs and the importance of federal activities (the term “federal action” includes all types of activities subject to the federal consistency requirement under subparts C, D, E, F and I of this part.);
( c ) To provide flexible procedures which foster intergovernmental cooperation and minimize duplicative effort and unnecessary delay, while making certain that the objectives of the federal consistency requirement of the Act are satisfied. Federal agencies, State agencies, and applicants should coordinate as early as possible in developing a proposed federal action, and may mutually agree to intergovernmental coordination efforts to meet the requirements of these regulations, provided that public participation requirements are met and applicable State management program enforceable policies are considered. State agencies should participate in the administrative processes of federal agencies concerning federal actions that may be subject to state review under subparts C, D, E, F and I of this part.
( d ) To interpret significant terms in the Act and this part;
( e ) To provide procedures to make certain that all Federal agency and State agency consistency decisions are directly related to the enforceable policies of approved management programs;
( f ) To provide procedures which the Secretary, in cooperation with the Executive Office of the President, may use to mediate serious disagreements which arise between Federal and State agencies during the administration of approved management programs; and
( g ) To provide procedures which permit the Secretary to review federal license or permit activities, or federal assistance activities, to determine whether they are consistent with the objectives or purposes of the Act, or are necessary in the interest of national security.
[65 FR 77154, Dec. 8, 2000, as amended at 71 FR 826, Jan. 5, 2006]
(No. 39965.

#### The People *ex rel.*Peter Levin, Appellant, *vs.*Richard B. Ogilvie, Sheriff, Appellant.

*Opinion filed January 19,1967.*

Rehearing *denied March 27, 1967.*

Ward, J., took no part.

Albert M. Sheppard, of Chicago, for appellant.

William G. Clark, Attorney General, of Springfield, and Daniel P. Ward, State’s Attorney, of Chicago, (Fred G. Leach, Assistant Attorney General, and Elmer C. Kissane, Joel M. Flaum, and Kenneth L. Gillis, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel,) for the People.

Mr. Justice Underwood

delivered the opinion of the court:

Peter Levin appeals from an order of the Cook County *567circuit court quashing a writ of *habeas corpus*issued on his petition challenging the validity of extradition proceedings whereby the State of Wisconsin sought petitioner’s return to answer to a pending theft charge.

The gist of petitioner’s argument is that he should have been permitted to prove the falsity of the Milwaukee County district attorney’s statements made in his application to the Governor of Wisconsin for extradition. The statements complained of were that “this demand * * * is not [made] for the purpose of collecting a debt” and “application * * * has not been made sooner, * * * because the accused could not be located or found before this date.” Petitioner sought to prove that the Wisconsin authorities told him the complainant in the criminal case claimed he was indebted to her and that he could avoid prosecution by paying the claim; he further sought to prove that his whereabouts were known to the Wisconsin authorities during the 18-month period preceding the application to the Governor of that State for extradition. Objections to his offers of proof were sustained.

We believe the trial judge ruled correctly. The scope of permissible inquiry in a *habeas corpus*action testing the validity of extradition proceedings is limited to determining (1) whether the accused is the person named in the warrant; (2) whether he is substantially charged with a crime in the demanding State; (3) whether he is a fugitive from justice of the demanding State; (4) whether the papers are regular in form. *(People ex rel. Ponak*v. *Lohman,*7 Ill.2d 156.) The testimony here offered sought only to challenge the good faith of the complainant and the authorities of the demanding State, matters we have consistently held may not be inquired into by the courts of this State in extradition matters. *People ex rel. Goldstein*v. *Babb,*4 Ill.2d 483, 488; *People ex rel. Ponak*v. *Lohman,*7 Ill.2d 156, 157; *People ex rel. Lacanski*v. *Backes,*19 Ill.2d 541, 545-6.

*568The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Mr. Justice Ward took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
#### § 309.12 Recordkeeping.

You must keep for one year records of how you determined fuel ratings. The records must be available for inspection by Federal Trade Commission staff members, or by people authorized by FTC.
#### Antonio Paolozzi, Respondent, v. John Viscosi, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred; De Angelis J., not sitting.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on August 27, 2004, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), HR-XML Consortium, Inc. (“HR-XML”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: HR-XML Consortium, Inc., Raleigh, NC. The nature and scope of HR-XML's standards development activities are: the development of voluntary, consensus standards for data interchange between and among human resource (HR) management systems. Topics for data interchange standards considered by HR-XML include: Payroll, employee benefits, compensation, recruiting, temporary staffing, background checks, drug testing, assessments, competencies, HR business process outsourcing, and other HR management processes.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-26220  Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
§ 432.4 Optional disclosures. Other operating characteristics and technical specifications not required in § 432.2 may be disclosed. *Provided,* that: ( a ) Any other power output is rated by the manufacturer, expressed in minimum watts per channel, and clearly and conspicuously labeled “This rating was not tested under the FTC standard” without the use of a footnote, asterisk, or similar notation to make the representation;
( b ) All disclosures or representations made under this section are less conspicuously and prominently made than any rated power output disclosure required in § 432.2. Any disclosure or representation bold faced or more than two-thirds the height of any rated power output disclosure required in § 432.2 is not less prominent; and
( c ) The rating and testing methods or standards used in determining such representations are well known and generally recognized by the industry at the time the representations or disclosures are made, are neither intended nor likely to deceive or confuse consumers, and are not otherwise likely to frustrate the purpose of this part.
[89 FR 49802, June 12, 2024]
##  Documentation for the 2002 Update of the National Seismic Hazard Maps

*By***Arthur D. Frankel*1*,   Mark D. Petersen*1*,   Charles S. Mueller*1*,   Kathleen M. Haller*1*,   Russell L. Wheeler*1*,   E.V. Leyendecker*1*,   Robert L. Wesson*1*,   Stephen C. Harmsen*1*,   Chris H. Cramer*2*,   David M. Perkins*1*, *and* Kenneth S. Rukstales*1***

***1***Denver, Colorado***2***Memphis, Tennessee

**U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 02-420**

----
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Manuel Johnson, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 58763;

First District (5th Division)

July 26, 1974.

James J. Doherty, Public Defender, of Chicago (Richard D. Kharas, Assistant Public Defender, of counsel), for appellant.

Remard Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago (Patrick T. Driscoll, Jr., and William J. Haddad, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel), for the People.

PER CURIAM.
_____ Amendment



Exhibit 10.58


Amendment No. 3

to

Glenn F. Tilton Secular Trust Agreement No. 2

THIS AMENDMENT NO. 3 is made as of this 31st day of December,
2003 to the Glenn F. Tilton Trust Agreement No. 2 dated September 5, 2002
(the "Trust") by and among UAL Corporation (the "Company"), Glenn F. Tilton
(the "Executive") and The Northern Trust Company, as trustee (the "Trustee").

WHEREAS, Section 9(a) of the Trust authorizes its amendment
by a written instrument executed by the Company, the Executive and the
Trustee; and

WHEREAS, the parties hereto wish to clarify the terms
of the Trust regarding the form of distribution to the Executive.


NOW, THEREFORE, the Company, Executive and Trustee
agree as follows:





1.     Section 2(d) of the
Trust is amended and restated to read as follows:




        "(d) In the
event that the Trustee has not been provided written notice, as provided
in Section 2(c) above, that there has occurred a forfeiture, or that there
is a dispute with respect to a notice, the Trust Fund will be paid in full
to Executive in cash or, if directed by Executive, in other property or
partly in cash and partly in other property as of the first business day
of January next following the earlier of September 2, 2004 or the Executive's
termination of employment."
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment
No. 3 as of the date first above written.



	Attest:

/s/ Marian Durkin 	UAL CORPORATION

By: /s/ Paul R. Lovejoy 
	Name: Marian Durkin 	Name: Paul R. Lovejoy
	Title: Vice President and 

        Deputy
General Counsel	Title: Senior Vice President

        General
Counsel and Secretary
	

Attest:

/s/ James R. Jacobsen	

THE NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee

By: /s/ Scott G. Borton 
	Name: James R. Jacobsen 	Name: Scott G. Borton 
	Title: Second Vice President 	Title: Vice President 
	 	

GLENN F. TILTON

/s/ Glenn F. Tilton
EXHIBIT
10.14


SUPPLEMENT TO

STANDARD FORM OF AGREEMENT

BETWEEN OWNER AND ENGINEER

FOR

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES


This AGREEMENT between
Tennessee Valley Agri-Energy, LLC hereinafter called OWNER, and ANTIOCH
International, Inc., hereafter called ENGINEER, for Professional Services dated
11-2-06 is hereby amended to include the following:


The work of Phase 1 – Study & Report is amended to
include feasible track concepts for the new Black Eagle, AL, site for Norfolk
Southern approval.


TIME FOR RENDERING
SERVICES:  The Work shall commence
immediately and be completed within 30 days of OWNER’S SIGNED AUTHORIZATION TO
PROCEED.  Unless otherwise specified,
completion of the Work shall include developing feasible track concepts for
your consideration.  The culmination of
Phase 1 work is the selection of the preferred alternate.  The produce of Phase 1 work will be
sufficient to obtain conceptual approval from Norfolk Southern.


CONTRACT PRICE:  The Price to be paid by OWNER to ENGINEER
shall be at hourly rates and reimbursable expenses not to exceed $3,500.00
without OWNER’S approval


The attachments and
exhibits which are a part of the original Agreement will apply.


By signing this
Agreement, OWNER acknowledges that it has read and fully understands this
AGREEMENT.  OWNER further agrees to pay
ENGINEER for services described herein upon receipt of invoice.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties hereto have made and executed this AGREEMENT.


	
  OWNER

  	
   

  	
  ENGINEER

  	 

	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	 

	
  TENNESSEE VALLEY AGRI-ENERGY, LLC

  	
   

  	
  ANTIOCH International, Inc.

  	 

	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	 

	
  BY:

  	
     /s/ Bartt McCormack 

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  BY:

  	
   

  	
    /s/ William J. Jones 

  	
   

  	 

	
   

  	
     Authorized Representative

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
      Authorized Representative

  	 

	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	 

	
  TITLE:

  	
   President/Chairman

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  TITLE:

  	
   

  	
  President

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	 

	
  EFFECTIVE DATE:

  	
  6/14/2007

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  DATE:

  	
   

  	
  6/11/2007

  	
   

  	 

	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	 

	
  ADDRESS: 

  540 Little Dry Creek Road 

  Pulaski, TN 38478 

  Telephone: 931-424-0653 

  OWNER’S Contact: Bartt McCormack

  	
   

  	
  ADDRESS: 

  2540 South 221st Circle 

  Elkhorn, NE 68022 

  Telephone: 402-289-2217 

  ENGINEER’S Contact: William J. Jones 

  Job No.: 03-025

  	 

															



 


PLEASE SIGN AND RETURN ONE ORIGINAL TO ENGINEER
NCCS Science Highlights - FY94 Supercomputing & Mass Storage Applications Supporting NASAResearch for Earth & Space SciencesFY94I am extremely pleased, on behalf of the NASA Center for Computational Sciences, to present our second issue of the NCCS Science Highlights. The publication describes FY94 computational results of NASA-funded research in the Earth and space sciences. Descriptions cover nearly 75 science highlights and include research objectives, accomplishments and significance. This year in addition to the Earth and space sciences sections, this publication includes a section on microgravity submissions. Many highlights include color images and charts from the experiments. To order a printed copy of this document, contact the NCCS documentation library at 301-286-1055 or [email protected].
Milton Halem, Chief, Space Data and Computing DivisionContentsPreface
- Highlights    Earth Sciences
  - Space Sciences      Microgravity
    - Appendices        **Abbreviations and Acronyms**
      - **Principal and Co-investigators**          **Acknowledgements**
### §10153. Interim at-reactor storage

The Commission shall, by rule, establish procedures for the licensing of any technology approved by the Commission under section 10198(a) 1 of this title for use at the site of any civilian nuclear power reactor. The establishment of such procedures shall not preclude the licensing, under any applicable procedures or rules of the Commission in effect prior to such establishment, of any technology for the storage of civilian spent nuclear fuel at the site of any civilian nuclear power reactor.

(Pub. L. 97–425, title I, §133, Jan. 7, 1983, 96 Stat. 2230.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 10198(a) of this title, referred to in text, was in the original a reference to section 219(a) of Pub. L. 97–425, which is classified to section 10199(a) of this title, and has been translated as section 10198(a) of this title as the probable intent of Congress in view of the subject matter of section 10198(a) which relates to development of technologies for storage of spent nuclear fuel, and the subject matter of section 10199(a) which relates to payments to States and Indian tribes.

1 See References in Text note below.
#### § 801.32 Conversion and acquisition.

A conversion is an acquisition within the meaning of the act.

# Example:

Assume that acquiring person “A” wishes to convert convertible voting securities of issuer X, and is to receive common stock of X valued in excess of $50 million (as adjusted). If “A” and “X” satisfy the criteria of Section 7A(a)(1) and Section 7A(a)(2)(B)(ii), then “A” and “X” must file notification and observe the waiting period before “A” completes the acquisition of the X common stock, unless exempted by Section 7A(c) or the regulations in this part. Since § 801.30 applies, the waiting period begins upon notification by “A,” and “X” must file notification within 15 days.

[43 FR 33537, July 31, 1978, as amended at 66 FR 8690, Feb. 1, 2001; 70 FR 4992, Jan. 31, 2005]
#### § 1217.1 Scope, application, and effective date.

This part 1217 establishes a consumer product safety standard for toddler beds manufactured or imported on or after October 20, 2011.
§ 1502.4 Office of the Secretary. ( a ) The mailing address of the Commission's Office of the Secretary is: Office of the Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Washington, DC 20207.
( b ) The address for delivery to the Office of the Secretary is: Office of the Secretary, Room 502, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland 20816.
( c ) The telephone number of the Office of the Secretary is (301)504-0800.
[56 FR 9278, Mar. 6, 1991, as amended at 62 FR 46667, Sept. 4, 1997]
#### Albert A. Lutz Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Bond Stores, Incorporated, Appellant.

Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
No: I-15-007 March 16, 2015

CONTACT: Diane Screnci 610-337-5330

 Neil Sheehan 610-337-5331

 

NRC Assigns New Senior Resident Inspector

To Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant 

 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in the Region I office in King of 

Prussia, Pa., have selected Amar Patel as the Senior Resident Inspector at the 

Oyster Creek nuclear power plant in Lacey Township, N.J. The plant is operated 

by Exelon Nuclear.

Prior to his recent promotion, Patel was a Resident Inspector at Oyster 

Creek. Since joining the agency in 2002, he has worked as a Resident Inspector at 

the Hope Creek plant in Lower Alloways Creek Township, N.J., and as a reactor inspector at various 

plants in the Northeast. He completed the NRC’s Nuclear Safety Professional Development Program 

and a rigorous NRC inspector qualification program. He holds a bachelor’s degree in electrical 

engineering and a master’s in engineering management from Drexel University in Philadelphia. 

“Amar Patel has the training, experience and commitment to safety that will help the NRC carry

out its mission of protecting people and the environment, and ensuring Exelon continues to safely 

operate Oyster Creek,” said NRC Region I Administrator Dan Dorman.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant site has at least two NRC Resident Inspectors. They

serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting regular inspections, monitoring 

significant work projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. Resident Inspectors can 

serve for up to seven years at any one site.

The Oyster Creek Resident Inspectors can be reached at 609-693-0702.
#### § 1507.10 Rockets with sticks.

Rockets with sticks (including skyrockets and bottle rockets) shall utilize a straight and rigid stick to provide a direct and stable flight. Such sticks shall remain straight and rigid and attached to the driver so as to prevent the stick from being damaged or detached during transportation, handling, and normal operation.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 04, 2015. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, September 04, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A15A2397. ROBERT H. BUTTRUM, JR. v. THE STATE.
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
### SUBCHAPTER II—PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 33 

AN ACT 

To amend the Securities Act of 1933 to specify when certain 

securities issued in connection with church plans are 

treated as exempted securities for purposes of that Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 33 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Church Plan Invest3 ment Clarification Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 AMENDMENT. 

5 Section 3(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 

6 U.S.C. 77c(a)(2)) is amended— 

7 (1) by inserting ‘‘(other than a retirement in8 come account described in section 403(b)(9) of the 

9 Internal Revenue Code of 1986, to the extent that 

10 the interest or participation in such single trust fund 

11 or collective trust fund is issued to a church, a con12 vention or association of churches, or an organiza13 tion described in section 414(e)(3)(A) of such Code 

14 establishing or maintaining the retirement income 

15 account or to a trust established by any such entity 

16 in connection with the retirement income account)’’ 

17 after ‘‘403(b) of such Code’’; and 

18 (2) by inserting ‘‘(other than a person partici19 pating in a church plan who is described in section 

20 414(e)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

21 1986)’’ after ‘‘section 401(c)(1) of such Code’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 18, 2011. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 33 

AN ACT 

To amend the Securities Act of 1933 to specify 

for purposes of that Act. church plans are treated as exempted securities when certain securities issued in connection with
§ 300.31 Maintenance of records. ( a ) Pursuant to the provisions of section 6 of the Act, every manufacturer of a wool product subject to the Act, irrespective of whether any guaranty has been given or received, shall maintain records showing the information required by the Act and Regulations with respect to all such wool products made by such manufacturer. Such records shall show: ( 1 ) The fiber content of the product specified in section 4(a)(2)(A) of the Act.
( 2 ) The maximum percentage of the total weight of the wool product of any non-fibrous loading, filling or adulterating matter as prescribed by section 4(a)(2)(B) of the Act.
( 3 ) The name, or registered identification number issued by the Commission, of the manufacturer of the wool product or the name or registered identification number of one or more persons subject to section 3 of the Act with respect to such wool product.
( 4 ) The name of the country where the wool product was processed or manufactured as prescribed by sections 300.25a and/or .25b.
( b ) Any person substituting labels shall keep such records as will show the information on the label removed and the name or names of the person or persons from whom the wool product was received.
( c ) The purpose of these records is to permit a determination that the requirements of the Act and Regulations have been met and to establish a traceable line of continuity from raw material through processing to finished product. The records shall be preserved for at least three years.
[53 FR 31314, Aug. 18, 1988]