alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 16.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) The regulations in this part implement the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. I.
( b ) These regulations shall apply to any advisory committee, as defined in paragraph (b) of § 16.2 of this part. However, to the extent that an advisory committee is subject to particular statutory provisions that are inconsistent with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, these regulations do not apply.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit _____________

No. 22-50789

consolidated with

No. 22-50816

Summary Calendar

_____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Manuel Ramon Macias-Ramirez, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas

USDC Nos. 4:22-CR-217-1, 4:22-CR-530-1

______________________________

Before Davis, Smith, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Manuel Ramon Macias-Ramirez appeals his conviction and sentence 

for illegal reentry into the United States under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1). 

He also appeals the district court’s order revoking the term of supervised 

release he was serving at the time of the offense. Because his appellate brief 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 30, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-50789 Document: 00516768497 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/30/2023
22-50789

c/w No. 22-50816

2

does not address the revocation or revocation sentence, he has abandoned 

any challenge to that order. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th 

Cir. 1993).

For the first time on appeal, Macias-Ramirez argues that his sentence 

exceedsthe statutory maximum and is therefore unconstitutional because the 

district court enhanced his sentence under § 1326(b) based on the fact of a 

prior conviction that was not alleged in the indictment or found by a jury 

beyond a reasonable doubt. He raises the issue to preserve it for further 

review and has filed an unopposed motion for summary disposition, correctly 

conceding that the issue is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 

523 U.S. 224 (1998). See United States v. Pervis, 937 F.3d 546, 553-54 (5th 

Cir. 2019).

Because his argument is foreclosed, summary disposition is 

appropriate. See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th 

Cir. 1969). Accordingly, Macias-Ramirez’s motion for summary disposition 

is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgments are AFFIRMED. 

Case: 22-50789 Document: 00516768497 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/30/2023
### §14052. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 14052 was editorially reclassified as section 12522 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
### **CHAPTER 117—ENCOURAGING GOOD FAITH PROFESSIONAL REVIEW ACTIVITIES**

Sec.
11101.
Findings.

#### SUBCHAPTER I—PROMOTION OF PROFESSIONAL REVIEW ACTIVITIES

11111.
Professional review.
11112.
Standards for professional review actions.
11113.
Payment of reasonable attorneys' fees and costs in defense of suit.
11114.
Guidelines of Secretary.
11115.
Construction.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—REPORTING OF INFORMATION

11131.
Requiring reports on medical malpractice payments.
11132.
Reporting of sanctions taken by Boards of Medical Examiners.
11133.
Reporting of certain professional review actions taken by health care entities.
11134.
Form of reporting.
11135.
Duty of hospitals to obtain information.
11136.
Disclosure and correction of information.
11137.
Miscellaneous provisions.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—DEFINITIONS AND REPORTS

11151.
Definitions.
11152.
Reports and memoranda of understanding.
#### § 423.4 Who is covered.

Manufacturers and importers of textile wearing apparel and certain piece goods are covered by this regulation. This includes any person or organization that directs or controls the manufacture or importation of covered products.
### §13013a. Omitted

Section, Pub. L. 101–647, title II, §218, as added Pub. L. 109–162, title I, §112(d)(2), Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 2986, which required the Inspector General of the Department of Justice to submit a report to Congress not later than Dec. 31, 2006, on activities funded by the National Court-Appointed Special Advocate Association, was omitted as obsolete.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 218 of Pub. L. 101–647 was renumbered section 219 and is classified to section 20324 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ocean Smart, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report’), I, Michael Boswell, Acting Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.








Date:  July 20, 2010





/s/  Michael Boswell


Acting Chief Accounting Officer
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# COMSECY-16-0006:  Revision to the Agency's Long-Term Research Program and Related Reporting to the Commission

Accession Number: ML16021A346

Date Released: Wednesday, April 13, 2016

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML16021A353 - COMSECY-16-0006:  Revision to the Agency's Long-Term Research Program and Related Reporting to the Commission (3 page(s), 2/29/2016)
    - ML16021A351 - COMSECY-16-0006: Enclosure - Revision to the Agency's Long-Term Research Program and Related Reporting to the Commission (5 page(s), 2/29/2016)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3768 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3768

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the credit for 
                    plug-in electric drive vehicles.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 30, 2011

  Mr. Kelly introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the credit for 
                    plug-in electric drive vehicles.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF CREDIT FOR PLUG-IN ELECTRIC DRIVE VEHICLES.

    Subsection (g) of section 30D of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended to read as follows:
    ``(g) Termination.--This section shall not apply to property placed 
in service after the date of the enactment of this sentence.''.
                                 <all>
```