alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, CoreyHenry, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2019-2(the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. Based onmy knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement inall material respects; and 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included inthis report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells FargoBank, N.A. and Computershare Trust Company, N.A. 

 
By: 
/s/ Corey Henry
Name: Corey HenryTitle: President and Chief Executive Officer Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)Date: March 31, 2022**
§ 456.2 Separation of examination and dispensing. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 60774 , July 26, 2024.
It is an unfair act or practice for an ophthalmologist or optometrist to: ( a ) Fail to provide to the patient one copy of the patient's prescription immediately after the eye examination is completed. Provided: An ophthalmologist or optometrist may refuse to give the patient a copy of the patient's prescription until the patient has paid for the eye examination, but only if that ophthalmologist or optometrist would have required immediate payment from that patient had the examination revealed that no ophthalmic goods were required;
( b ) Condition the availability of an eye examination to any person on a requirement that the patient agree to purchase any ophthalmic goods from the ophthalmologist or optometrist;
( c ) Charge the patient any fee in addition to the ophthalmologist's or optometrist's examination fee as a condition to releasing the prescription to the patient. Provided: An ophthalmologist or optometrist may charge an additional fee for verifying ophthalmic goods dispensed by another seller when the additional fee is imposed at the time the verification is performed; or
( d ) Place on the prescription, or require the patient to sign, or deliver to the patient a form or notice waiving or disclaiming the liability or responsibility of the ophthalmologist or optometrist for the accuracy of the eye examination or the accuracy of the ophthalmic goods and services dispensed by another seller.
Exhibit 35.1



Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services,
Inc.



This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered
to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 12, 2019 (the “Agreement”) and Item
1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2019-2 (the “Trust”),
the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by
AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith. The capitalized terms
used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.



The undersigned certifies
that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the
preceding period from January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under
the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. |                                        
|------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------
|                                     |                                        
|By:                                  | /s/ Connie Coffey                      
|                                     | Connie Coffey                          
|                                     | Executive Vice President, Corporate    
|                                     | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Medina  International  Corp.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending March 31, 2005,  as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Nick DeMare,  Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Nick DeMare
-----------------------
Nick DeMare
Chief Financial Officer




<PAGE>
### §12645d. Matching funds for severely economically distressed communities

#### (a) In general

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a severely economically distressed community that receives assistance from the Corporation for any program under the national service laws shall not be subject to any requirements to provide matching funds for any such program, and the Federal share of such assistance for such a community may be 100 percent.

#### (b) Severely economically distressed community

For the purposes of this section, the term "severely economically distressed community" means—

(1) an area that has a mortgage foreclosure rate, home price decline, and unemployment rate all of which are above the national average for such rates or level, for the most recent 12 months for which satisfactory data are available; or

(2) a residential area that lacks basic living necessities, such as water and sewer systems, electricity, paved roads, and safe, sanitary housing.

(Pub. L. 101–610, title I, §189A, as added Pub. L. 111–13, title I, §1612, Apr. 21, 2009, 123 Stat. 1539.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 2009, see section 6101(a) of Pub. L. 111–13, set out as an Effective Date of 2009 Amendment note under section 4950 of this title.
§ 1511.5 Structural integrity tests. ( a ) *Nipple.* Hold the pacifier by the shield or guard, grasp the nipple end of the pacifier and gradually apply a tensile force to the pacifier nipple in any possible direction. The force shall be applied gradually, attaining but not exceeding 10.0 pounds (44.5 newtons) within a period of 5 seconds and maintained at 10.0 pounds for an additional 10 seconds.
( b ) *Handle or ring.* Hold the pacifier by the shield or guard or base of the nipple, and push or pull on the handle or ring in any possible direction. The force shall be applied gradually attaining but not exceeding 10.0 pounds (44.5 newtons) within a period of 5 seconds and maintained at 10.0 pounds for an additional 10 seconds.
( c ) *Heat cycle deterioration.* After the testing prescribed in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, all pacifiers shall be subject to the following: submerge the pacifier in boiling water for 5 minutes and then remove the pacifier and allow it to cool for 5 minutes in room temperature air, 60° to 80 °F. (16° to 27 °C). After the cooling period, resubmerge the pacifier in the boiling water for 5 minutes. The process shall be repeated for a total of 6 boiling/cooling cycles. After the sixth cycle, the pacifier shall again be subjected to the structural tests in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section and section 1511.3.
( d ) *Small parts.* Any components or fragments which are released as a result of the tests specified in paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) of this section shall be placed in the truncated cylinder shown in Figure 2, such that the component or fragment is in the lowest position in the cylinder. If the uppermost edge of the component or fragment is below the plane of the top of the cylinder, the pacifier shall fail the test in this section.
CHAPTER 11

. CUSTOMER SUBGROUP ANALYSIS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

11.1 METHODOLOGY

................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 11

- 1

11

- iCHAPTER 11. CUSTOMER SUBGROUP ANALYSIS

11.1 METHODOLOGY

The customer subgroup analysis evaluates impacts on any identifiable groups or

customer s who may be di sproportionately affected by a national energy conservation standard. The U.S. Department of Energy ( DOE ) will conduct this analysis as one of the analyses for the notice of proposed rulemaking (NOPR)

. DOE will accomplish this, in part, by analyzing the life

cycle costs ( LCC s) and payback periods (PBPs) for those customer s that fall into any identifiable

grou ps. DOE plans to evaluate variation s in regional energy prices, variations in energy use

, and

variations in installation costs that might affect the net present value of a standard to customer subpopulations. To the extent possible, DOE will obtain estimat es of each input parameter’s variability and will consider this variability in its calculation of customer impacts.

DOE will determine the impact on customer subgroups using the LCC Spreadsheet Model, which allows for different data inputs. The standard L CC analysis (described in c hapter 8) focuses on the customers that use refrigerated beverage vending machines

. DOE can use the LCC Spreadsheet Model to analyze the LCC for any subgroup by sampling only that subgroup. (Chapter 8 explains in detail the input s to the model used in determining LCC s and PBPs.)

11

- 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel, Program Project.                    

*Date:*                         December 8, 2004.                    

*Time:*                         2 a.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6101 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Paul A. Coulis, PhD, Health Scientist Administrator, Office of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, 6101 Executive Boulevard, Suite 220, Bethesda, MD 20892-8401, (301) 443-2105.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.277, Drug Abuse Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, Scientist Development Awards, and Research Scientist Awards; 93.278, Drug Abuse National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.279, Drug Abuse Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-26249  Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECURITIES ACT RULES 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14(a)

I, Jon E. Kirchner, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of DTS, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: November 9, 2009By:

/s/ JON E. KIRCHNER Jon E. Kirchner President and Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 231 (Thursday, December 2, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 70162]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26678]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION


Regular Board of Directors Meeting; Sunshine Act

Time and Date: 2 p.m., Monday, December 6, 2004.

Place: Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation, 1325 G Street, NW., Suite 
800, Washington, DC 2005.

Status: Open/closed.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey T. Bryson, General Counsel/
Secretary, (202) 220-2372; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f9939b8b808a9697b9978ed7968b9e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4c262e3e353f23220c223b62233e2b">[email protected]</span></a>.

Agenda: 
I. Call to Order
II. Approval of Minutes: September 20, 2004 Regular Meeting
III. Audit Committee Report
    A. Tape Recording of Meetings
IV. Treasurer's Report
V. Establishment of a Committee To Review Fundraising Activities
VI. CEO Management Report
VII. Executive Session (Closed)
    a. Corporate Administration Committee Reports
    b. Update on COO Search
VIII. Adjournment

Jeffrey T. Bryson,
General Counsel/Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04-26678 Filed 11-30-04; 3:18 pm]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Cite as Dayton v. State, 122 Ohio St.3d 544, 2009-Ohio-4119.] 

THE CITY OF DAYTON, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. 

[Cite as Dayton v. State, 122 Ohio St.3d 544, 2009-Ohio-4119.] 

Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of Lima v. State. 

(No. 2008-1252 — Submitted July 14, 2009 — Decided August 20, 2009.) 

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. 22221, 

176 Ohio App.3d 469, 2008-Ohio-2589. 

__________________ 

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority 

of Lima v. State, 122 Ohio St.3d 155, 2009-Ohio-2597, 909 N.E.2d 616. 

 MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR,

O’DONNELL, and CUPP, JJ., concur. 

 LANZINGER, J., dissents. 

__________________ 

Green & Green, Thomas M. Green, Jane M. Lynch, and Jared A. Wagner, 

for appellant. 

 Richard Cordray, Attorney General, Benjamin C. Mizer, Solicitor General, 

Michael L. Stokes, Assistant Solicitor, and Pearl M. Chin and Sharon A. Jennings, 

Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee state of Ohio. 

______________________
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# Cyber Security Public Meeting Summary

Accession Number: ML15356A357

Date Released: Friday, January 13, 2017

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML15356A313 - 12-10-15 Summary of Public Meeting to Discuss Technical Issues Regarding Cyber Security Proposed Rulemaking for Fuel Cycle Facilities. (2 page(s), 1/12/2016)
    - ML15356A336 - 12/10/2015 Enclosure 1 Public Meeting Summary for Technical Discussion on the Proposed Cyber Security Rulemaking for Fuel Cycle Facilities. (5 page(s), 12/10/2015)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
*

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-10284

Summary Calendar

 

YSIDRO CASTILLO, JR.,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

SAM L. PRATT, Warden;

KATHLEEN HAWK SAWYER, Director;

JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General,

Respondents-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(3:01-CV-1226-R)

--------------------

September 6, 2002

Before DAVIS, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Petitioner-Appellant Ysidro Castillo, Jr., federal prisoner #

24866-077, appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. He

contends that (1) the district court violated Apprendi v. New

Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) by sentencing him on the basis of the

quantity of dugs stated in the presentence report, because the jury
2

did not determine the drug amount, and (2) Apprendi is

retroactively applicable to his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition.

We have not yet decided whether Apprendi applies retroactively

on collateral review, see United States v. Clark, 260 F.3d 382 (5th

Cir. 2001). Even so, Castillo’s Apprendi claim lacks merit. True,

after Apprendi, the jury should have been charged to find the drug

amount. See United States v. Miranda, 248 F.3d 434, 445 (5th Cir.

2001), cert. denied, 122 S. Ct. 410 (2001), and 122 S. Ct. 823

(2002). Nevertheless, Castillo has failed to show that the error,

although plain, seriously affected the fairness of the proceedings.

See United States v. Cotton, 122 S. Ct. 1781, 1785-86 (2002).

Therefore, regardless whether Apprendi applies retroactively to

cases on collateral review, Castillo cannot show that the district

court’s failure to instruct the jury on drug quantity entitles him

to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 relief. Accordingly, the district court’s

judgment is 

AFFIRMED.

S:\OPINIONS\UNPUB\02\02-10284.0.wpd

4/29/04 8:38 am