alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

Pursuant to the requirements set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Patrick Henry, Chief Executive Officer and President of Entropic Communications, Inc.
(the Company), and David Lyle, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended March 31, 2008, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Quarterly Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and

2. The information contained in the
Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of May 6, 2008.



|                                      |  |  |  |                              
|------------------------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|                                      |  | 
|/s/ Patrick Henry                     |  |  |  | /s/ David Lyle               
|Patrick Henry                         |  |  |  | David Lyle                   
|Chief Executive Officer and President |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal Executive Officer)         |  |  |  | (Principal Financial Officer)



|* | This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into
any filing of Entropic Communications, Inc. made under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Form 10-Q, except to the extent that the Company
specifically incorporates this certification by reference therein.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NRC Staff Review of the 

Yucca Mountain License Application 

Safety Evaluation Report 

Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Waste in a Geologic 

Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada 

The Safety Evaluation Report (SER) provides the U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff’s evaluation of the license 

application submitted by the U.S. Department of Energy for the 

proposed repository at Yucca Mountain. The SER specifically 

addresses whether the license application satisfies the 

requirements in 10 CFR Part 63 for the disposal of high-level 

radioactive waste in a geologic repository. 

The NRC staff issued its SER for the proposed repository as 

NUREG-1949. The SER consists of five volumes: 

Volume 1: General Information 

Volume 2: Repository Safety before Permanent 

Closure 

Volume 3: Repository Safety after Permanent 

 Closure 

Volume 4: Administrative and Programmatic Information 

Volume 5: Proposed Conditions on the Construction Authorization and Probable 

Subjects of License Specifications 

The report is available on the NRC website at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/waste/hlw-disposal/key-documents.html#sers 

In the SER, the NRC staff found, with reasonable assurance, that the DOE application meets the 

applicable regulations in 10 CFR Part 63, with two exceptions. The NRC staff determined in Volume 4 of 

the SER that DOE has not satisfied certain regulatory requirements regarding (1) ownership of the land 

where the facility would be located, and (2) the rights to the water necessary to construct and operate the 

repository. Thus, in the SER, the NRC staff did not recommend issuance of a construction authorization. 

Publication of the SER is only one of several steps that must be completed before a decision can be 

made on the construction authorization application. A decision on whether to authorize construction can 

be made only after: 

o A supplement to DOE’s environmental impact statement regarding potential impacts of the 

proposed action on groundwater has been prepared,

o A hearing has been conducted on contested issues, and

o The Commission has completed its review of contested and uncontested issues.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

# DATES:

Written comments should be received on or before December 29, 2004 to be assured of consideration. 

## Departmental Offices/Office of Foreign Assets Control 

*OMB Number:*                     1505-0177.                 

*Form Numbers:*                     None.                 

*Type of Review:*                     Extension.                 

*Title:*                     Procedures for Payments to Persons Who Hold Certain Categories of Judgments.                 

*Description:*                     Submissions will provide the U.S. Government with information to be used in determining the eligibility of an applicant under Sec. 2002 of Public Law 106-386 (The Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000) and to complete processing of payments under Sec. 2002.                 

*Respondents:*                     Individuals or households.                 

*Estimated Number of Respondents:*                     20.                 

*Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent:*                     12 hours.                 

*Frequency of Response:*                     On occasion.                 

*Estimated Total Reporting Burden:*                     240 hours.                 

*Clearance Officer:*                     Lois K. Holland, Departmental Offices, Room 2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220, (202) 622-1563.                 

*OMB Reviewer:*                     Joseph F. Lackey, Jr., Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503, (202) 395-7316.                 

Lois K. Holland,

Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. 04-26267 Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4811-16-P
No. 15-088 December 18, 2015

CONTACT: Maureen Conley, 301-415-8200

NRC Renews License for Dry Spent Fuel Storage Facility at Prairie Island

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission on Dec. 9 approved a 40-year license renewal for 

Northern States Power Co.-Minnesota’s dry-cask independent spent fuel storage installation at the 

Prairie Island nuclear power plant in Goodhue County, Minn. 

The license now has an expiration date of Oct. 31, 2053. The initial 20-year license would have 

expired Oct. 31, 2013, but Northern States Power submitted a request to renew it in 2011. This meant 

the facility was considered to be in “timely renewal,” where the license would not expire as long as the 

NRC staff was reviewing the request. This allowed the Prairie Island independent spent fuel storage 

installation to continue to operate under its existing license until the NRC completed its safety and 

security review, and reached a decision on the license renewal application. The NRC published the final 

Environmental Assessment in July and documented the safety review in a final Safety Evaluation 

Report, issued Dec. 9.

The renewed license, the sixth the NRC has issued for a dry cask storage facility, contains 

conditions requiring periodic inspections of the casks and their components to ensure potential aging 

effects are identified and managed. These conditions require Northern States Power to evaluate any 

issues and take corrective action to address anything that could prevent a cask component from 

performing its safety function. 

“Our decision to relicense Prairie Island’s dry cask storage systems is based on our finding that 

they meet the NRC’s strict standards and will be able to store spent fuel safely over the extended period 

of the renewed license,” said Anthony Hsia, acting Director of the NRC’s Division of Spent Fuel 

Management. “Inspections by the licensee and the NRC going forward will ensure any effects from 

aging will be managed so they do not affect the casks’ ability to protect workers, the public and the 

environment.”

There are now operating independent spent fuel storage facilities at 69 sites in the United States. 

Spent fuel is moved into NRC-approved dry casks after an appropriate time of cooling in a spent fuel 

pool. Plants implement dry storage when their spent fuel pools are at or near capacity.
No: I-14-006 February 11, 2014

CONTACT: Diane Screnci 610-337-5330

 Neil Sheehan 610-337-5331

NRC Assigns New Resident Inspector 

To Limerick Generating Station

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia, Pa., have 

selected Richard Montgomery as the new resident inspector at the Limerick nuclear 

power plant. He joins Senior Resident Inspector Gene DiPaolo at the two-unit site in 

Limerick, Pa.

Montgomery joined the NRC in 2009 after earning a bachelor’s degree in 

marine engineering from the Massachusetts Maritime Academy. He then completed 

the NRC’s Nuclear Safety Professional Development Program, a two-year training 

program that provides specialized training in nuclear safety and a broad perspective of NRC regulatory 

activities. Montgomery also completed a rigorous NRC inspector qualification program. Most recently, 

Montgomery became a fully qualified physical security inspector in the Region I Division of Reactor 

Safety. In that position, he conducted inspections of security programs at the nuclear power plants in the 

northeastern United States. 

“Richard Montgomery has the training and commitment to safety that will help the NRC carry out 

its mission of protecting people and the environment, and he will help ensure the safe operations of the 

Limerick units,” said NRC Region I Administrator Bill Dean.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear plant site has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They serve as 

the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major work projects and 

interacting with plant workers and the public.

The Limerick resident inspectors can be reached at 610-327-1344.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 230 (Wednesday, December 1, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 69990]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26378]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board


Release of Waybill Data

    The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from the 
Association of American Railroads (WB463-7, September 3, 2004) for 
permission to use certain data from the Board's Carload Waybill 
Samples. A copy of this request may be obtained from the Office of 
Economics, Environmental Analysis, and Administration.
    The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; 
therefore, if any parties object to these requests, they should file 
their objections with the Director of the Board's Office of Economics, 
Environmental Analysis, and Administration within 14 calendar days of 
the date of this notice. The rules for release of waybill data are 
codified at 49 CFR 1244.9.
    Contact: Mac Frampton, (202) 565-1541.

Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04-26378 Filed 11-30-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
§ 460.13 Fact sheets. If you are a manufacturer, you must give retailers and installers fact sheets for the insulation products you sell to them. Each sheet must contain what is listed here. You can add any disclosures that are required by federal laws, regulations, rules, or orders. You can add any disclosures that are required by State or local laws, rules, and orders, unless they are inconsistent with the provisions of this regulation. Do not add anything else. Each fact sheet must contain these items: ( a ) The name and address of the manufacturer. It can also include a logo or other symbol that the manufacturer uses.
( b ) A heading: “This is ________ insulation.” Fill in the blank with the type and form of your insulation.
( c ) The heading must be followed by a chart: ( 1 ) If § 460.12(b) requires a chart for your product's label, you must use that chart. For foamed-in-place insulations, you must show the R-value of your product at 31 ⁄ 2 inches. You can also show R-values at other thicknesses.
( 2 ) You can put the charts for similar products on the same fact sheet. For example, if you sell insulation boards or batts in three different thicknesses, you can put the label charts for all three products on one fact sheet. If you sell loose-fill insulation in two different bag sizes, you can put both coverage charts on one fact sheet, as long as you state which coverage chart applies to each bag size.
( d ) For air duct insulation, the chart must be followed by this statement: “The R-value of this insulation varies depending on how much it is compressed during installation.”
( e ) After the chart and any statement dealing with the specific type of insulation, ALL fact sheets must carry this statement, boxed, in 12-point type: READ THIS BEFORE YOU BUY What You Should Know About R-values The chart shows the R-value of this insulation. R means resistance to heat flow. The higher the R-value, the greater the insulating power. Compare insulation R-values before you buy. There are other factors to consider. The amount of insulation you need depends mainly on the climate you live in. Also, your fuel savings from insulation will depend upon the climate, the type and size of your house, the amount of insulation already in your house, your fuel use patterns and family size, proper installation of your insulation, and how tightly your house is sealed against air leaks. If you buy too much insulation, it will cost you more than what you'll save on fuel. To get the marked R-value, it is essential that this insulation be installed properly.
( f ) For R-19 insulation batts, the fact sheet must also disclose the insulation's R-value when installed in wall cavities where the insulation's thickness exceeds the depth of the cavity.
[44 FR 50242, Aug. 27, 1979, as amended at 45 FR 68928, Oct. 17, 1980; 70 FR 31276, May 31, 2005; 84 FR 20789, May 13, 2019]
### §13862. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 13862 was editorially reclassified as section 12222 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
§ 23.9 Misrepresentation as to content of pewter. ( a ) It is unfair or deceptive to mark, describe, or otherwise represent all or part of an industry product as “Pewter” or any abbreviation if such mark or description misrepresents the product's true composition.
( b ) An industry product or part thereof may be described or marked as “Pewter” or any abbreviation if it consists of at least 900 parts per 1,000 Grade A Tin, with the remainder composed of metals appropriate for use in pewter.
#### Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company, Appellant, v Village of Croton-on-Hudson, Respondent.

[818 NYS2d 779]

In a subrogation action to recover for property damage, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (LaCava, J.), entered May 31, 2005, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the action on the ground that the plaintiff failed to serve a valid notice of claim.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, with costs, and the motion is denied.

The notice of claim actually served was substantially the same as the proposed notice of claim annexed to the plaintiffs application for leave to serve a late notice of claim, which was granted by the same court in a related proceeding, correctly identified the claimant as Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company, and was properly verified *(see State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Rodriguez,*12 AD3d 662 [2004]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in dismissing the action on the ground that the notice of claim actually served differed from the proposed notice of claim. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Lunn, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of George Thorsen, Appellant, v Nassau County Civil Service Commission, Respondent.

[821 NYS2d 273]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Nassau County Civil Service Commission disqualifying the petitioner for the position of Nassau County Director of Probation, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Alpert, J.), entered September 23, 2004, which denied his motion to punish the respondent for civil contempt.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly denied the petitioner’s motion to punish the respondent for civil contempt. “To succeed on a motion to punish for civil contempt, the moving party must show that the alleged contemnor has, with knowledge of its existence, violated a clear and unequivocal court order and that the violation prejudiced a right of a party to the litigation” *(Matter of Ramirez v New York State Dept. of Health,*219 AD2d 724, 724-725 [1995]; *see*Judiciary Law § 753 [A]; *Matter of McCormick v Axelrod,*59 NY2d 574, 583 [1983]). Here, the record unequivocally demonstrates that several months before a judgment was even signed and entered in the instant proceeding, the position for which the petitioner was deemed qualified and for which position the respondent was directed by the judgment “to process the petitioner’s application,” was already filled by an appointment made by the former County Executive and approved by the County Legislature. The petitioner never sought *1038any injunctive relief as to that appointment. Consequently, the petitioner failed to demonstrate how any action or inaction of the respondent defeated, impaired, impeded, or prejudiced his rights. As aptly noted by the Supreme Court, at this point, to compel the processing of the petitioner’s application would be a futile gesture. “Mandamus will not lie to compel a public official to perform a vain or useless or illegal act” *(Matter of Beckmann v Talbot,*252 App Div 870, 871 [1937], *revd on other grounds*278 NY 146 [1938]).

Additionally, because the judgment did not direct the actual appointment of the petitioner, it cannot be shown that the respondent’s failure to comply with it directly caused the petitioner to lose the benefits of such an appointment. Therefore, contrary to the petitioner’s contention, he is not entitled to “full back pay,. . . benefits and all other emoluments of employment” retroactive to May 5, 2000, the date he was improperly found unqualified and his application rejected. The aim in imposing a penalty for civil contempt is not to punish, but rather, to compensate the injured party for the loss of or interference with the benefits of the court mandate *(see McCain v Dinkins,*84 NY2d 216, 226 [1994]; *Matter of McCormick v Axelrod, supra; Matter of Fishel v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal,*172 AD2d 835, 837 [1991]). Here, the petitioner did not demonstrate how any failure of the respondent to comply with the Supreme Court’s judgment resulted in injury to him. Crane, J.P., Luciano, Rivera and Lunn, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1      Section 906 Certification of CEO

                        CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Armor Electric Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Merrill
Moses, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.



BY:  /S/ MERRILL MOSES
     ----------------------------
Merrill Moses
President and CEO
November 21, 2005
§ 301.8 Use of terms “Persian Lamb,” “Broadtail Lamb,” and “Persian-broadtail Lamb” permitted. ( a ) The term *Persian Lamb* may be used to describe the skin of the young lamb of the Karakul breed of sheep or top-cross breed of such sheep, having hair formed in knuckled curls.
( b ) The term *Broadtail Lamb* may be used to describe the skin of the prematurely born, stillborn, or very young lamb of the Karakul breed of sheep or top-cross breed of such sheep, having flat light-weight fur with a moire pattern.
( c ) The term *Persian-broadtail Lamb* may be used to describe the skin of the very young lamb of the Karakul breed of sheep or top-cross breed of such sheep, having hair formed in flattened knuckled curls with a moire pattern.
( d ) The terms “Persian Lamb”, “Broadtail Lamb”, or “Persian-broadtail Lamb” shall not be used to describe: ( 1 ) The so-called Krimmer, Bessarabian, Rumanian, Shiraz, Salzfelle, Metis, Dubar, Meshed, Caracul, Iranian, Iraqi, Chinese, Mongolian, Chekiang, or Indian lamb skins, unless such lamb skins conform with the requirements set out in paragraph (a), (b), or (c) of this section respectively; or
( 2 ) any other lamb skins having hair in a wavy or open curl pattern.
(May 13, 1949.)

#### In the Matter of the Claim of Josephine Concilla, Respondent, against Scrufari Construction Company, Inc., et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

*885Foster, P. J., HefEernan, Brewster and Bergan, JJ., concur; Deyo, J., dissents in the following memorandum: Deceased, a laborer, was last seen alive working at or near the edge of an eight-foot trench. His body was found at the bottom of the trench. No one witnessed the accident. The cause of death was given as acute cardiac failure, chronic myocarditis and arteriosclerosis. The injuries sustained from the fall were inconsequential. There is no substantial evidence to sustain the finding that death was the result of accidental injuries arising out of and in the course of employment; on the contrary there is positive medical proof that death occurred prior to the fall. In view of such evidence the presumption embodied in section 21 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law does not apply and the decision and award should be reversed.
#### § 1237.1 Scope.

This part establishes a consumer product safety standard for booster seats.
#### In the Matter of J. Sidney Bernstein, an Attorney.

Proceeding dismissed. Order to he settled on notice. Present—Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Smith and Page, JJ.