alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Contact Us

#   Underground Storage Tanks (USTs)

          -                  National UST Program Cleans Up Over 500,000 UST Releases      
Read more about progress cleaning up UST releases over 33 years.
 
          -                  2015 Revised Underground Storage Tank Regulation      - Read about the revised regulation . 
- Access plain language publications about the revised regulation .
- Learn about the October 2018 deadline .
 
          -                  UST Performance Measures      
Read more about the performance measures.
 
          -                  Natural Disasters and Underground Storage Tanks      
EPA has developed resources to help UST owners and operators prepare for, prevent, or lessen catastrophic effects and environmental harm from natural disasters. Read more about the resources.
 

Approximately 542,000 underground storage tanks (USTs) nationwide store petroleum or hazardous substances. The greatest potential threat from a leaking UST is contamination of groundwater, the source of drinking water for nearly half of all Americans. EPA, states, territories, and tribes work in partnership with industry to protect the environment and human health from potential releases.

                  - Introduction to underground storage tanks
                  - Benefits of preventing and cleaning up UST releases
                  - UST Finder Web Map
                  - UST Program Timeline

                - UST owners and operators
                - UST inspectors
                - States and territories

                  - Release prevention
                  - Release detection
                  - Delivery prohibition

                - Introduction to cleaning up UST releases
                - Leaking UST corrective action resources
                - Petroleum brownfields

                - Introduction to USTs in Indian Country
                - Training resources for tribes
                - Publications for tribes
                - Tribal data
                - UST and LUST Training

                - Introduction
                - Compatibility requirements for storing biofuels
                - Regulatory requirements table
                - Corrosion issues in storing emerging fuels
                - Additional reading and resources

aboveground storage tanks

Contact Us
§ 12.8 Separation of functions. ( a ) An Administrative Judge, or Administrative Law Judge, will not be responsible to or subject to the supervision or direction of any officer, employee, or agent of the Commission engaged in the performance of investigative or prosecutorial functions for the Commission.
( b ) No officer, employee, or agent of the Federal Government engaged in the performance of investigative or prosecutorial functions in connection with any proceeding shall, in that proceeding or a factually related proceeding, participate or advise in the decision of an Administrative Judge, or Administrative Law Judge, except as a witness in the proceeding, without the express written consent of the parties to the proceeding. This paragraph (b) shall not apply to the Commissioners.
[86 FR 64352, Nov. 18, 2021]
#### § 1512.8 Requirements for drive chain.

The drive chain shall operate over the sprockets without catching or binding. The tensile stength of the drive chain shall be no less than 8010 N (1,800 lbf) or 6230 N (1,400 lbf) for sidewalk bicycles.
§ 301.21 Disclosure of used furs. ( a ) When fur in any form has been worn or used by an ultimate consumer it shall be designated “used fur” as a part of the required information in invoicing and advertising.
( b ) When fur products or fur mats and plates are composed in whole or in part of used fur, such fact shall be disclosed as a part of the required information in labeling, invoicing and advertising; as for example:
Leopard Used Fur or Dyed Muskrat Contains Used Fur
### §14307. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are necessary to carry out this chapter.

(Pub. L. 104–142, §8, May 13, 1996, 110 Stat. 1332.)
#### § 604.1 Severability.

All parts and subparts of this subchapter are separate and severable from one another. If any part or subpart is stayed or determined to be invalid, the Commission intends that the remaining parts and subparts shall continue in effect.
Appendix C 

Phantom 2 Quick Start Guide 

(Source: http://www.dji.com/product/phantom-2/download) 
.... 

-

Front Side \\\\\\ /(/((/ ct -

' 

- -------------"} I 

I \ 

Mlcro--USB Frort LEDS 

S2 

OowerSwitch 

Antenna 

:'-r 

.. ... Sl 

• ----Joy,tkb 

Powor Indicator 

'Ill' ... 

Gimbal Pitch Cor.trol Lever 

''''""""'"""""&·---'!l!IO'

Basic 

.. Fo

.. 

.. 1.\\\ 

Sette<yL -

. evellodi<etoc ---- "" - :.---------·----;

Aote,,nl! I ·l 

:1> 
PHANTOl¥12 

QUICK START GUIDE 

Scan QR Code to Watch the Quick Start Video 

or browse direct to 

(!) Product 

(2) Quick Start Guide 

<)) H3-2U Gimbal Assembly 

/Jr. For ms a:""d k'l" furth11r instruction, 

1t th.1t Y"U wntch t"lfl vukor. above n full t:cforo attempting 

tt' the f>tumtofTI2 

THE FLIGHT 

,. ON/OFF 

Pres> ttm 1-IH:ular .;u\ .on Ofi<..H, Uwn pre<;s and hold fur 2 

3cco11ds to the flight bflttcry. 

). Pms5 the circular hut:on one{!, tho" hold for 2 

tn !urn r-ff thP fl.ghf hattf'ry. 

A ATTEr--lT!ON: Pres.;mq the circular button O'lCe w1th r-c 

further actto'l w>ll .ndK:nte cwn;nt BA -TERY LEVEL 

• •• 

Boll<>rtl..,vslnc•ca!:>r 

ATTACHING THE PROPELLERS 

RP.move the foJr war"llng c8rds from the motors. 

> Screw the propellers, clockwis!! for grey nuts and antk!ock"wise 

for black nuts, nnto the four motors. Be 5Ure to mate!- the 

black propeller nuts with the black dot rrotors. 

ii A TIENTION, DO \JOT uae thread lock on the propeUer shafts. 

FLIGHT INDICATORS 

:> fl<Jshing Hlady to 'ly with GPS. 

> Sbw yellow flashing indkotes roody to fly w1thcut GPS. 

,.. ir,dicates your Remoto Con:rollor 

,.. f-ast red irdicates low fl:ghl battery level 

> Piaaso refer to t1e card attached to the RemoteContrt!ller 

fcrrror!?detais. 

• 

/ 

P":ETUP OF THE ZEN MUSE H3-2D 

GIMBAL (OPTIONAL) 

-----·-------·-·· 

> The ZENMLSE H:!:-2D girnbal is recommt!nr••d for a better 

aerial experierce. The installat"""Jn is quick and convement, as the GCU and other controlwterfaces have beerbuilt i1tO the Phantom 2. 

refer to the "H3-2D Gimbal St..rt Gu•cle" for more 

details. 

•. """ .. ,-, 

-

-

·!;& l1 

\ 

P':ALIBRATING THE COMPASS 

> R"f'rdly fl p tim fr-;.>•n the' fully up' to'',. · Fts'oy down' 

posotions for 

» the LED Flight to ,ol!d yellow. the 

> Hnldlrg Ph,rtnm ') it ?i<'lO 

ax·s unlillhe LED Flight !11dic:otors sw1tch to 

> 711en wh1ht hold1'19 t•w Pi"o<>ntoM 2 "IN11ca!ly, m!o!<• 360' r.m 1\s 

c<J,tara><murti1ttmLEOI='hght ndi:ntor3hghtd1•P;ppoor>. 

A f,TIEtHION: If the LED Indicators flasto betw00n vt'l'ow'.lnd 

n1d, thon 111,. hu• FAILED. You .,.,.,rand repeut 

th<tp1fl\IIOUS!rtep<Ufll.llthaproceS!l5SUCCFSSfu) 

cJ 

.,.!'-

(i) ® 

ci 

I 

r 

CONTRO

> 89 sure Sl a11d 

> lnstail 4 x AA b

Controller. 

A A ITENT!ON: A 

Remote Contro

,.. 

A /I.TTENT!QN, Ohll 

DO NOT 5l<'p •I-.e m

L.
§ 1501.4 Size requirements and test procedure. ( a ) No toy or other children's article subject to § 1500.18(a)(9) and to this part 1501 shall be small enough to fit entirely within a cylinder with the dimensions shown in Figure 1, when tested in accordance with the procedure in paragraph (b) of this section. In testing to ensure compliance with this regulation, the dimensions of the Commission's test cylinder will be no greater than those shown in Figure 1. (In addition, for compliance purposes, the English dimensions shall be used. The metric approximations are included only for convenience.)
( b ) ( 1 ) Place the article, without compressing it, into the cylinder. If the article fits entirely within the cylinder, in any orientation, it fails to comply with the test procedure. (Test any detached components of the article the same way.)
( 2 ) If the article does not fit entirely within the cylinder, subject it to the appropriate “use and abuse” tests of 16 CFR 1500.51 and 1500.52 (excluding the bite tests of §§ 1500.51(c) and 1500.52(c)). Any components or pieces (excluding paper, fabric, yarn, fuzz, elastic, and string) which have become detached from the article as a result of the use and abuse testing shall be placed into the cylinder, one at a time. If any such components or pieces fit entirely within the cylinder, in any orientation and without being compressed, the article fails to comply with the test procedure.
#### In the Matter of Willie W., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[819 NYS2d 478]

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Bogacz, J.), dated May 31, 2005, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated May 19, 2005, made after a hearing, finding that the appellant had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of attempted robbery in the third degree, attempted grand larceny in the fourth degree, and menacing in the third degree, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and placed him on probation for a period of 15 months. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order dated May 19, 2005.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency *(see Matter of David H.,*69 NY2d 792, 793 [1987]; *Matter of Quanel M.,*8 AD3d 386 [2004]), we find that it *480was legally sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of attempted robbery in the third degree *(see*Penal Law §§ 110.00, 160.05; *Matter of Anthony C., 155*AD2d 537 [1989]), attempted grand larceny in the fourth degree *(see*Penal Law §§ 110.00, 155.30 [5]; *Matter of John F.,*12 AD3d 509, 510 [2004]; *cf. Matter of Shawn V., 4*AD3d 369, 370 [2004]), and menacing in the third degree *(see*Penal Law § 120.15; *Matter of Corey C.,*23 AD3d 461, 462 [2005]). With respect to menacing in the third degree, we find that the complainant had a well-founded fear of serious physical injury after the appellant grabbed the complainant’s neck and raised a clenched fist near his face *(see Matter of Rosalis D.,*305 AD2d 407, 408 [2003]).

Moreover, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the trier of fact, which saw and heard the witnesses *(see Matter of Jabari*W., 18 AD3d 767 [2005]; *Matter of James B.,*262 AD2d 480, 481 [1999]). The determination of a Family Court Judge sitting as trier of fact is to be accorded the same weight as that given to a jury verdict, and its determination should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see Matter of Gabriel*A., 12 AD3d 666, 667 [2004]; *Matter of James B., supra*at 481). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the findings of fact were not against the weight of the evidence *(cf.*CPL 470.15 [5]). Prudenti, P.J., Adams, Rivera and Lifson, JJ, concur.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. David PEREZ-GARCIA, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 07-6891.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 13, 2007.

Decided: Sept. 19, 2007.

David Perez-Garcia, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer Marie Hoefling, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Perez-Garcia seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appeal-ability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Perez-Garcia has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Zoel N. Lynch, Respondent, against Kathleen King et al., Appellants.

Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 801.]
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3640 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire not more than 18 

acres of land and interests in land in Mariposa, California, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 13, 2011 

Mr. DENHAM (for himself and Mr. FARR) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire not 

more than 18 acres of land and interests in land in 

Mariposa, California, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. YOSEMITE NATIONAL PARK LAND ACQUISI4 TION. 

5 (a) ACQUISITION.—The Secretary of the Interior may 

6 acquire not more than 18 acres of land and interests in 

7 land near the junction of highways CA–49 and CA–140 

8 in Mariposa, California. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3640 IH

1 (b) PROHIBITION ON ACQUISITION BY EMINENT DO2 MAIN.—The Secretary may not acquire property under 

3 this section by eminent domain. 

4 (c) PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION.—The Sec5 retary— 

6 (1) shall administer land or interests in land ac7 quired under this section as part of Yosemite Na8 tional Park in accordance with applicable laws and 

9 regulations; and 

10 (2) may partner with Mariposa County regard11 ing land use planning related to land and interests 

12 in land acquired under this section. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
§ 1511.3 Guard or shield requirements. ( a ) *Performance requirements.* Place the pacifier in the opening of the fixture illustrated in Figure 1(a) of this part so that the nipple of the pacifier is centered in the opening and protrudes through the back of the fixture as shown in Figure 1(b). For pacifiers with non-circular guards or shields, align the major axis of the guard or shield with the major axis of the opening in the fixture. Apply a tensile force to the pacifier nipple in the direction shown. The force shall be applied gradually attaining but not exceeding 2.0 pounds (8.9 newtons) within a period of 5 seconds and maintained at 2.0 pounds for an additional 10 seconds. Any pacifier which can be completely drawn through an opening with dimensions no greater than those of Figure 1(a) by such a force shall fail the test in this part.
( b ) *Ventilation holes.* The pacifier guard or shield shall contain at least two holes symmetrically located and each being at least 0.20 inches (5 millimeters) in minor dimension. The edge of any hole shall be no closer than 0.20 inches (5 millimeters) to the perimeter of the pacifier guard or shield.
### SUBCHAPTER IV—DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS; COORDINATED INTERGOVERNMENTAL POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 0F THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Donal  R.  Myrick,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report  of  Spectrum  Sciences  & Software Holdings Corp. on Form 10-QSB for the
quarterly  period  ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements
of  Section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information  contained  in  such  Form  10-QSB  fairly  presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results, of operations of Spectrum Sciences
&  Software  Holdings  Corp.


                                                  /s/ Donal R. Myrick
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                  Name:  Donal R. Myrick
                                                  Title  Chief Executive Officer
                                                  Dated: December 3, 2003


<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 233 (Monday, December 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 70468]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26699]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1564-DR]


New York; Amendment No. 5 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of New York (FEMA-1564-DR), dated October 1, 2004, and 
related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 16, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of New York is hereby amended to include Individual 
Assistance for the following areas among those areas determined to have 
been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by 
the President in his declaration of October 1, 2004:

    Madison, Oneida, and Wayne Counties for Individual Assistance.
    Allegany, Broome, Cattaraugus, Monroe, Niagara, Onondaga, 
Orange, Orleans, Steuben, Sullivan, and Ulster Counties for 
Individual Assistance (already designated for Public Assistance.)

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, 
Individuals and Households Program-Other Needs; 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

Michael D. Brown,
Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of 
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 04-26699 Filed 12-3-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Leopold Tschirky, Respondent, v. Florence Tschirky, Appellant.

Final order affirmed. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
MINUTES OF THE GOVER NING BOARD

OF THE ANTELOPE VALL EY AIR QUALITY MANAG EMENT DISTRICT LANCASTER, CALIFORNI A

AGENDA ITEM

DATE: March 18, 2 014

RECOMMENDATION: Set date of April 15, 2014 to conduct a public hearing to

consider the amendment of Rule 701

- Air Pollution Emergency Contingency Actions and approval of CEQA documentat ion.

SUMMARY: This item officially sets the date for the mandatory public hearing to be

held on the Amendment of Rule 701

. The proposed amendment to Rule 701 will provide administrative cleanup of this rule by replacing out

- of

- date references and updating rule

format

.

BACKGROUND: The Antelope Valley Air Pollution Control District (AVAPCD) was created by statute on July 1, 1997, with a jurisdiction of the Los Angeles County portion of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) that was not within the South Coast Air Basin. SCAQMD rules in effect in the AVAPCD remained in effect until the AVAPCD Governing Board superseded or amended them. On Janu ary 1, 2002 the AVAQMD was formed pursuant to statute to replace the AVAPCD (Health & Safety Code §§41300 et seq.). The rules of the AVAPCD also remain in effect until the AVAQMD Governing Board supersedes or amends them

The proposed amendments to Rule 7 01 Air Pollution Emergency Contingency Actions will provide administrative cleanup of this rule by replacing out

- of

- date references, updating rule format and adjusting Episode Criteria for PM

.

This action was previously noticed by publication December 20

, 2013, but no action was

taken.

A Notice of Exemption , Categorical Exemption (Class 8; 14 Cal. Code Reg. §15308) will be prepared by the AVAQMD for the Amendment of Rule 701 pursuant to the requirements of CEQA.

REASON FOR R ECOMMENDATION: Health & Safety Code §§40702 and 40703 require the Governing Board to hold a public hearing before adopting rules and regulations. Also, 42 U.S.C. §7410(l) (FCAA §110(l)) requires that all SIP revisions be adopted after public notice and h earing.

Cc: Barbara LodsMINUTES OF THE GOVER NING BOARD

OF THE ANTELOPE VALL EY AIR QUALITY MANAG EMENT DISTRICT LANCASTER, CALIFORNI A

AGENDA ITEM PAG E 2

REVIEW BY OTHERS: This item was reviewed as to legal form by Karen Nowak, District Counsel and by Eldon Heaston, Executive Director on or before March 26, 2014.

FINANCIAL DATA: No increase in appropriation is anticipated.

PRESENTER: Bret Banks

, Operations Manager
No: II-15-041 September 25, 2015

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416 

NRC Begins Special Inspection at BWX Technologies facility in Lynchburg

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has launched a special inspection at the BWX 

Technologies fuel facility in Lynchburg, Va., to assess the circumstances surrounding the discovery 

that workers may have exceeded controls for criticality safety in a production line glovebox. 

A glovebox is used by workers to remotely handle radioactive materials and there are strict 

limits for how much radioactive material and other important materials are allowed within the 

glovebox. Those controls are important to prevent a criticality, which can occur when uranium 

accumulates in sufficient quantity and shape to initiate a chain reaction. At the BWXT facility, there 

were no safety related consequences or criticality, but the potential lapse in controls prompted the NRC 

to conduct the special inspection. The specific process involved remains shut down.

“BWXT identified this issue and took immediate corrective actions,” said Len Wert, NRC 

Region II Deputy Administrator. “However, a special inspection is appropriate to ensure we fully 

understand what happened and the possible implications.”

The special inspection will look at the sequence of events, evaluate the effectiveness of 

corrective actions, assess the adequacy of management measures and procedures in the area, review the 

company’s own root cause analysis and determine the adequacy of the event reporting. 

A fuel facility inspector from the NRC’s Region II office in Atlanta arrived at the site today and 

began gathering information. The inspection is likely to take at least a week. A report documenting the 

findings will be issued within 30 days after the inspection is completed.