alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BISNIS Trades & Tenders, February 23, 1998

----

INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT, U.S. & FOREIGN COMMERCIAL SERVICE AND U.S.DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 1997.  ALL RIGHTS RESERVED OUTSIDE OF THE UNITEDSTATES.
THE BUSINESS INFORMATION SERVICE FOR THE NEWLY INDEPENDENT STATES (BISNIS)HAS CREATED THE BISNIS TRADES AND TENDERS ELECTRONIC NEWSLETTER TO HELP U.S.COMPANIES FIND BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES IN THE EXPANDING MARKETS OF THE NEWLYINDEPENDENT STATES (NIS) OF THE FORMER SOVIET UNION.
THESE OPPORTUNITIES ARE PROVIDED SOLELY AS AN INFORMATIONAL SERVICE AND DONOT REPRESENT AN ENDORSEMENT BY THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE.VERIFICATION OF LEADS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE READER. BISNIS MAY CONSIDEROTHER PRIVATE SECTOR-GENERATED TRADE LEADS AND TENDERS, IN ELECTRONIC FORMONLY, AND PUBLISH ON A SPACE-AVAILABLE BASIS. PLEASE SEND YOUR LEADS TO[email protected]
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Take A Ride, Inc. (the "Company")on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, AnthonyN. DeMint, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or			15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all			material respects, the financial condition and results of operations			of the Company. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/ Anthony N. DeMint                                        |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Anthony N. DeMint |
|--------|-------------------|

|   | President and Chief Accounting Officer |
|--------|----------------------------------------|

|   | January 29, 2007 |
|--------|------------------|
QPort Cbemicals b FtnroprodLxts (heshitt Ron PNaza 70212766E 4417 l.arcastet Pice Wllnington, DE 19805 USA 

# oU i p 0 to 

### DuPont Citemicals & Tluoi -oproducts

DeCeIIll)er 12, 2011 

### U.S. En-sironinental Protection Agency ofl' ice of Air and Radiation Stratospheric Protection Dix=ision Attention: Margaret Sheppard 13to L 

### Street NIN', ioth 

### Floor (Room 1029) Washington, DC 20005 Dear 

### Ms Sheppard: Reference: DuPont SNAP Information Notice

(Z)-i,1,1,4,4,4-hexafluoro-but-2-ene (CAS RN 6 92

- 

### 49

- 9)

Original filed response

Ciiestnut Run Plan 702/1276-E, Wilmington, DE 19805 E. I. du Pont de Nemours and CompanyPlease coutact me if you have any questions about this submission or need further clarification.

Sincerely,

Via Federal Express
Exhibit
      23





Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





Board
      of
      Directors and Shareholders


Coachmen
      Industries, Inc.





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
      S-8 No. 333-52378) pertaining to the Retirement Plan and Trust of Coachmen
      Industries, Inc., 2000 Omnibus Stock Incentive Program and Supplemental Deferred
      Compensation Plan, Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-59251) pertaining
      to
      the 1994 Omnibus Stock Incentive Program, Registration Statement (Form S-8
      No.
      2-64572) pertaining to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Coachmen Industries,
      Inc. and in the related Prospectus of our reports dated February 23, 2006,
      with
      respect to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
      schedule of Coachmen Industries, Inc., and subsidiaries, Coachmen management's
      assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
      and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Coachmen
      Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
      of
      Coachmen Industries, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005.








/s/
                Ernst & Young LLP








Grand
      Rapids, MI


February
      23, 2006
No: III-14-005 February 19, 2014

CONTACT: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663

NRC Increases Oversight of Duane Arnold Nuclear Power Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff issued a white finding of low-to-moderate safety 

significance to the Duane Arnold nuclear power plant for failing to perform an immediate operability 

evaluation of the Reactor Core Isolation Cooling (RCIC) system. The finding will result in increased 

oversight by the NRC.

The plant, operated by NextEra Energy Duane Arnold, is located eight miles northwest of Cedar 

Rapids, Iowa.

NRC inspectors determined the licensee failed to perform an immediate operability evaluation 

and did not recognize the RCIC system was inoperable after receiving a signal that the turbine speed 

indicator was in a degraded condition. As a result, this system, which is one of the sources of water for 

cooling the reactor in case of certain plant events, would not have been available to fulfill its safety 

function. However, in case of an actual event, other systems are in place to provide cooling water to the 

reactor.

The utility has taken corrective actions to resolve the problem. 

“Even though the issue did not have an impact on public safety, the additional oversight by the 

NRC is warranted because we expect plants to properly assess the availability and reliability of safety 

equipment to ensure the plant’s ability to respond to an event,” said Region III Administrator Cynthia 

D. Pederson. “We will conduct additional inspections to make sure that the causes of the issue are 

understood and the plant’s corrective actions are sufficient to prevent recurrence.”

As a result of this finding and a previous white finding issued on Dec. 18, 2013, the plant will 

move from Column 2 to Column 3 of the NRC’s Action Matrix, retroactive to the third quarter of 2013. 

The initial white finding involved the failure to have an appropriate procedure for the reassembly of a 

standby diesel generator’s oil heat exchanger. As a result, one of the station’s two diesel generators was 

inoperable.

The NRC will conduct an inspection focusing on both white findings to determine whether the 

plant staff has understood what caused the individual problems and determine if there are common 

performance issues for the findings; assess if there are safety culture issues that contributed to 

performance deficiencies; and independently verify the licensee has taken sufficient actions to correct 

the problems.
Page | 2

The company has 30 days to contest the finding. The NRC inspection letter detailing the final 

determination will be publically available via ADAMS.
#### Vincent Eramo, Appellant, v. F. W. Woolworth Company, Respondent.

Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Kimball and Piper, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Merci, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008(the Report), I, Jose Acevedo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations. Date: March 11, 2009 /s/ Jose Acevedo Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Tabatha V, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report"), I, Kevin Lau Hing Bun, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1)  The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/Kevin Lau Hing Bun Kevin Lau Hing Bun, Acting Chief Financial Officer November 9, 2006
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

LEON WILCOX

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 0756

[ April 26, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St.

Lucie County ; Steven J. Levin

, Judge ; L.T. Case No. 562015CF001951

.

T. Charles Shafer, Fort Pierce , for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joseph D.

Coronato, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

L EVINE

, C ONNER and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### In the Matter of Helene Hamlin, an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee of the Fifth Judicial District, Petitioner. (Proceeding No. 1.)

[821 NYS2d 498]

Order entered finding respondent guilty of professional misconduct. Same Per Curiam as in *Matter of Hamlin*(— AD3d —, 2006 NY Slip Op 07078 [2006]). Present — Scudder, J.P., Gorski, Green and Pine, JJ.
Issue Date: 01/27/15 1 15-001 

 NRC INSPECTION MANUAL DIRS 

Change Notice 15-001

 DELETED: TRANSMITTED: 

 Number Date Number Date

1. IP 65001.06 04/18/08 IP 65001.06 01/27/15 

2. IP 71111.20 11/09/09 IP 71111.20 01/27/15 

3. 

TRAINING: No 

REMARKS: IP 65001.06, “Inspection of ITAAC-Related Installation of Mechanical 

Components,” has been revised as a periodic update. 

 IP 71111.20, “Refueling and Other Outage Activities,” has been revised to group 

existing fatigue assessment guidance into a new, separate section, and to add IP 

71111.11 as acceptable guidance to observe start-up activities in the control 

room, based on the 2014 ROP Enhancement Project feedback. 

DISTRIBUTION: Standard 

END
SERVED: March 10, 2014 

US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

IN THE MATTER OF 

- SKYWEST AIRLINES 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0904 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0868 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0869 

FDMS NO. F AA-2012- 0872 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0873 

FDMS NO. F AA-2012- 0874 

FDMS NO. FAA-2013- 0617 

FDMS NO. FAA-2013- 0619 

HEARING NOTICE 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and considered on May 

19 through 23,2014, inclusive, in the U.S. Tax Court, Courtroom 5223, Wallace F. Bennett 

Federal Building, 125 S. State Street, Salt Lake City, UT 84138

1

• 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

·Attachment: Service List 

1 Counsel may present the cases in any sequence. Absent agreement the cases will be heard in the order listed. 
c 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY . 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

Todd C. Emerson, Respondent's Counsel 

Director - Government and Legal Affairs 

SkyWest Airlines 

444 South River Road 

St. George, UT 84 790 

TEL: 435-634-3530 . 

FAX: 435-634-3505 

ONE COPY 

Michael L. Dworkin, Respondent's Counsel 

MICHAEL L. DWORKIN AND ASSOCIATES 

465 California Street, Suite 210 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

TEL: 415-421-2500 

FAX: 415-421-2560 

EMAIL: law@avialex.com 

Robert Spitzer, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of Regional Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, W A 98057 

TEL: 425-227-1417 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

FDMS Nos. FAA-2012-

0868,2012-0869,2012-0872, 

2012-0873,2012-0874,2013-

0617,2013-0619,2012-0904 

· (Civil Penalty Actions) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2 
The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

3
#### § 432.6 Liability for violation.

If the manufacturer or, in the case of foreign made products, the importer or domestic sales representative of a foreign manufacturer, of any product covered by this part furnishes the information required or permitted under this part, then any other seller of the product shall not be deemed to be in violation of § 432.5 of this part due to his reliance upon or transmittal of the written representations of the manufacturer or importer if such seller has been furnished by the manufacturer, importer, or sales representative a written certification attesting to the accuracy of the representations to which this part applies: *And provided further,* That such seller is without actual knowledge of the violation contained in said written certification.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Frank Canizio, Appellant.

On May 25, 1931, appellant, together with one Guariglia and one Bruno, was indicted for robbery in the first degree, grand larceny in the second degree and assault in the second degree. When arraigned on that day, they pleaded not guilty. On June 1, 1931, they withdrew their pleas of not guilty and pleaded guilty to robbery in the first degree, unarmed. On June 19, 1931, appellant was sentenced to a term of fifteen to thirty years. In 1945, appellant applied for an order in the nature of *coram nobis*on the ground that he was not represented by counsel or advised of his right to counsel at the time of arraignment, plea, or sentence. The District Attorney opposed the motion on the ground that, although the court records did not indicate that defendant was represented by counsel or advised of his right to counsel at the time of arraignment or plea, they did indicate that he was represented by counsel at the time of imposition of sentence. Appellant did not deny that statement. The application was denied and the order was affirmed *(Canizio*v. *New York,*327 U. S. 82). In July, 1950, the codefendant, Guariglia, moved to set aside the judgment of conviction on the ground of fraud of the court in inducing the plea of guilty and lack of representation at the time of sentence by authorized counsel. After a hearing directed by the Court of Appeals *(People*v. *Guariglia,*303 N. Y. 338), the motion was granted on January 4, 1952. In February, 1953, appellant moved to set aside the judgment of conviction on the same grounds on which Guariglia had moved. The District Attorney opposed the motion on the ground that the determination of the Supreme Court (327 U. S. 82, *supra)*was *res judicata*and that appellant could not now raise on this application the contention that he was not represented by authorized counsel because he had not raised it in the 1945 application. Appellant’s motion was denied. *956as was his motion for reargument, and he appeals from both orders. Order-denying application reversed on the law and the facts and matter remitted to the County Court of Kings County for a hearing of the issues. Under the facts and circumstances presented by this record, appellant is entitled to a hearing *(People*v. *Guariglia, supra).*Appeal from order denying reargument dismissed. The order is not appealable. Adel, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., concur.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00622

- CR

Randy Keith Seibel

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From Criminal District Court No. 4

o f Ta rrant County (1195090D )

January 23, 2014

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s jud gment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

/s/ Lee Gabriel

By

_________________________________ Justice Lee Gabriel
### §11152. Reports and memoranda of understanding

#### (a) Annual reports to Congress

The Secretary shall report to Congress, annually during the three years after November 14, 1986, on the implementation of this chapter.

#### (b) Memoranda of understanding

The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall seek to enter into memoranda of understanding with the Secretary of Defense and the Administrator of Veterans' Affairs to apply the provisions of subchapter II of this chapter to hospitals and other facilities and health care providers under the jurisdiction of the Secretary or Administrator, respectively. The Secretary shall report to Congress, not later than two years after November 14, 1986, on any such memoranda and on the cooperation among such officials in establishing such memoranda.

#### (c) Memorandum of understanding with Drug Enforcement Administration

The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall seek to enter into a memorandum of understanding with the Administrator of Drug Enforcement relating to providing for the reporting by the Administrator to the Secretary of information respecting physicians and other practitioners whose registration to dispense controlled substances has been suspended or revoked under section 824 of title 21. The Secretary shall report to Congress, not later than two years after November 14, 1986, on any such memorandum and on the cooperation between the Secretary and the Administrator in establishing such a memorandum.

(Pub. L. 99–660, title IV, §432, Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3794.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Reference to Administrator of Veterans' Affairs deemed to refer to Secretary of Veterans Affairs pursuant to section 10 of Pub. L. 100–527, set out as a Department of Veterans Affairs Act note under section 301 of Title 38, Veterans' Benefits.
§ 1205.32 Definitions. In addition to the definitions set forth in section 3 of the act (15 U.S.C. 2052) and in § 1205.3 of the standard, the following definitions shall apply to this subpart B of part 1205: ( a ) *Manufacturer* means any person or firm that manufactures or imports power lawn mowers subject to this standard, and includes those that assemble power lawn mowers from parts manufactured by other firms.
( b ) *Manufactured* means the earliest point at which the mower is in the form in which it will be sold or offered for sale to the consumer or is in the form in which it will be shipped to a distributor or retailer. In these forms, a “manufactured” mower may still require partial assembly by the consumer or the lawn mower dealer.
( c ) *Private labeler* means an owner of a brand or trademark which is used on a power lawn mower subject to the standard and which is not the brand or trademark of the manufacturer of the mower, provided the owner of the brand or trademark has caused or authorized the mower to be so labeled and the brand or trademark of the manufacturer of such mower does not appear on the label.
( d ) *Production lot* means a quantity of mowers from which certain mowers are selected for testing prior to certifying the lot. All mowers in a lot must be essentially identical in those design, construction, and material features which relate to the ability of a mower to comply with the standard.
( e ) *Reasonable testing program* means any test or series of tests which are identical or equivalent to, or more stringent than, the tests defined in the standard and which are performed on one or more mowers of the production lot for the purpose of determining whether there is reasonable assurance that the mowers in that lot comply with the requirements of the standard.
§ 23.12 Definition and misuse of the word “diamond.” ( a ) A diamond is a mineral consisting essentially of pure carbon crystallized in the isometric system. It is found in many colors. Its hardness is 10; its specific gravity is approximately 3.52; and it has a refractive index of 2.42.
( b ) It is unfair or deceptive to use the unqualified word “diamond” to describe or identify any object or product not meeting the requirements specified in the definition of diamond provided above, or which, though meeting such requirements, has not been symmetrically fashioned with at least seventeen (17) polished facets. Note to Paragraph ( b
):
It is unfair or deceptive to represent, directly or by implication, that industrial grade diamonds or other non-jewelry quality diamonds are of jewelry quality.
( c ) The following are examples of descriptions that are not considered unfair or deceptive: ( 1 ) The use of the words “rough diamond” to describe or designate uncut or unfaceted objects or products satisfying the definition of diamond provided above; or
( 2 ) The use of the word “diamond” to describe or designate objects or products satisfying the definition of diamond but which have not been symmetrically fashioned with at least seventeen (17) polished facets when, in immediate conjunction with the word “diamond,” there is either a disclosure of the number of facets and shape of the diamond or the name of a type of diamond that denotes shape and that usually has less than seventeen (17) facets (e.g., “rose diamond”).
( 3 ) The use of the word “cultured” to describe laboratory-created diamonds that have essentially the same optical, physical, and chemical properties as mined diamonds if the term is qualified by a clear and conspicuous disclosure (for example, the words “laboratory-created,” “laboratory-grown,” “[manufacturer name]-created,” or some other word or phrase of like meaning) conveying that the product is not a mined stone.
Note to Paragraph ( c
):
Additional guidance about imitation and laboratory-created diamond representations and misuse of the words “real,” “genuine,” “natural,” “precious,” “semi-precious,” and similar terms is set forth in §§ 23.25 and 23.27.
#### § 240.1 Purpose of the Guides.

The purpose of these Guides is to provide assistance to businesses seeking to comply with sections 2(d) and (e) of the Robinson-Patman Act (the “Act”). The guides are based on the language of the statute, the legislative history, administrative and court decisions, and the purposes of the Act. Although the Guides are consistent with the case law, the Commission has sought to provide guidance in some areas where no definitive guidance is provided by the case law. The Guides are what their name implies—guidelines for compliance with the law. They do not have the force of law. They do not confer any rights on any person and do not operate to bind the FTC or the public.