alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 228 (Monday, November 29, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 69394]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26208]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--EMVCo, LLC

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 20, 2004, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), EMVCo, LLC (``EMVCo'') has 
filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General 
and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal 
place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the 
nature and scope of its standards development activities. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: EMVCo, LLC, 
Foster City, CA. The nature and scope of EMVCo's standards development 
activities are: (1) Managing, maintaining, and enhancing the 
EMV<INF>tm</INF> Integrated Circuit Card Specifications for Payment 
Systems; (2) standards maintenance that ensures interoperability and 
acceptance of payment system integrated circuit cards on a worldwide 
basis; and (3) a type approval process that defines test requirements 
and test cases that are used for terminal compliance testing.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-26208 Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
FOREWORD

March 24, 2016			 			 Foreword – Page i

FOREWORD 

This document sets forth the procedures governing the 

conduct of business at the Commission level of the Nuclear

Regulatory Commission. It provides an overview of the 

Commission’s responsibilities, Commission's decisionmaking process, including procedures governing formal 

Commissioner voting, the conduct of Commission meetings, 

Commissioner involvement in institutional correspondence, 

transmittal of sensitive documents to Congress, and 

Commission testimony. These procedures may be changed 

or waived by a majority of the Commission and questions 

regarding implementation and interpretation are decided by 

the Commission as a collegial body, consistent with existing 

law. 

The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) is a statutorily 

established office conducting independent audits and 

investigations within the agency. The OIG has a statutory 

responsibility to communicate with the Congress, separate 

and apart from communication between the Commission and 

Congress. Accordingly, unless specifically stated, the 

requirements of these procedures with respect to Commission 

review and processing of documents, testimony, and 

personnel do not apply to the OIG. 

At the request of any member of the Commission, or on the 

Secretary’s own initiative, the Secretary may review the 

procedures, with assistance from the Office of the General 

Counsel, to determine whether they should be updated to 

reflect approved reorganizations or other changes, amended 

to improve efficiency or effectiveness, or amended to ensure 

conformity with legal requirements and Commission policy. 

Changes should be proposed by the Secretary as a 

COMSECY voting paper. Any member of the Commission 

may propose changes to any provision or aspect of the 

procedures as a COM voting paper.1 

Annette L. Vietti-Cook 

Secretary of the Commission

1 For a discussion of COMSECY and COM voting papers, see Chapter II of these 

procedures.
#### § 239.5 Performance of warranties or guarantees.

A seller or manufacturer should advertise that a product is warranted or guaranteed only if the seller or manufacturer, as the case may be, promptly and fully performs its obligations under the warranty or guarantee.
### §11803. Approval of applications

In selecting among applications submitted under section 11802(a) of this title, the Secretary shall give priority to applicants who propose to carry out projects and activities—

(1) for the purposes specified in section 11801 of this title in geographical areas in which frequent and severe drug-related crimes are committed by gangs whose membership is composed primarily of youth, and

(2) that the applicant demonstrates have the broad support of community based organizations in such geographical areas.

(Pub. L. 100–690, title III, §3503, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4255; Pub. L. 101–204, title X, §1001(a), Dec. 7, 1989, 103 Stat. 1826.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1989—Par. (2). Pub. L. 101–204 substituted "have" for "that it has".
No: I-14-034 September 15, 2014

CONTACT: Diane Screnci 610-337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan 610-337-5331 

NRC Launches Special Inspection at Millstone 3 Nuclear Power Plant

In Response to Continuing Problems with Pump

Problems affecting a pump that is part of a reactor safety system will be the focus of a Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission Special Inspection at the Millstone Unit 3 nuclear power plant. The Waterford, 

Conn., plant is operated by Dominion Nuclear.

The Special Inspection team will have three members and will begin its work today (Sept. 15). 

The component of interest is the plant’s turbine-driven auxiliary, or back-up, feedwater pump. That 

pump is one of several that can be used to help cool down the reactor after a shutdown by pumping 

water into the secondary side of the plant’s steam generators. The steam generators are essentially large 

heat exchangers that convert heat generated by the reactor into steam, which in turn is used to spin the 

turbine and produce electricity.

The basis for this Special Inspection is the failure of the turbine-driven auxiliary feedwater 

pump to pass quarterly surveillance tests on July 15 and Sept. 10. During both tests, the pump started 

and then unexpectedly stopped. It then restarted without operator intervention and reached rated speed 

approximately 15 minutes later. The pump has since undergone repairs and been restored to service.

“A key objective of this inspection will be to learn more about this latest malfunctioning of this 

safety-related component,” NRC Region I Administrator Bill Dean said. “The repetitive problems 

affecting the pump continue to give the NRC concern.”

Areas to be reviewed during the Special Inspection will include the adequacy and completeness 

of testing on the pump and causal evaluations of the problems. The results of the Special Inspection 

will be discussed in a report expected to be issued within 45 days after the completion of the review.

The NRC conducted a Special Inspection earlier this year into what appear to be unrelated 

issues with the same pump. That inspection report was issued Aug. 28.
#### § 923.30 General.

This subpart sets forth the requirements for management program approvability with respect to boundaries of the coastal zone. There are four elements to a State's boundary: the inland boundary, the seaward boundary, areas excluded from the boundary, and, in most cases, interstate boundaries. Specific requirements with respect to procedures for determining and identifying these boundary elements are discussed in the sections of this subpart that follow.
§ 1302.1 Scope and application. ( a ) In this part 1302 the Consumer Product Safety Commission (Commission) declares extremely flammable contact adhesives and similar liquid or semiliquid consumer products to be banned hazardous products under sections 8 and 9 of the Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA) (15 U.S.C. 2057 and 2058). This ban applies to those extremely flammable contact adhesives and similar liquid or semiliquid consumer products, as defined in § 1302.3(b), which are in commerce or are being distributed in commerce on or after the effective date of this regulation, and which are consumer products (as defined in section 3(a) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 2052) customarily produced or distributed for sale to, or for the personal use, consumption or enjoyment of consumers in or around a permanent or temporary household or residence, a school, in recreation or otherwise.
( b ) An extremely flammable contact adhesive as defined in § 1302.3(b) is a banned hazardous product if the manufacturer, distributor, or retailer customarily produces or distributes the product for sale to, or use by consumers, or if the manufacturer, distributor, or retailer fosters or facilitates the product's sale to, or use by, consumers. For example, contact adhesives available in retail stores, such as lumber yards or hardware stores, for sale to consumers would be included in the scope of the ban even though such outlets may sell such products primarily to industrial or professional users. The manufacturer who markets an extremely flammable contact adhesive which would be subject to the ban if sold to consumers has the responsibility for determining the distribution and use patterns of its product and for taking all reasonable steps to ensure that the product is not made available for sale to consumers. The test of whether a contact adhesive is banned shall be whether the product, under any customary or reasonably foreseeable condition of distribution, or sale, is made available for purchase by consumers.
( c ) Contact adhesives that are labeled as, marketed, and sold solely for industrial or professional use are not within the scope of this ban. However, merely labeling a contact adhesive for industrial or professional use only would not exclude such products from this ban. In addition, packaging a contact adhesive in a large size container would not in itself exclude the product from this ban.
( d ) The Commission has found that the contact adhesives covered by this ban are being, or will be distributed in commerce; and present an unreasonable risk of injury; and that no feasible consumer product safety standard under the CPSA would adequately protect the public from the unreasonable risk of injury associated with these products.
April 7, 2016 

The Honorable Maggie Hassan 

Governor of New Hampshire 

107 North Main Street 

Concord, NH 03301 

Dear Governor Hassan: 

 On behalf of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, I extend our congratulations to 

the State of New Hampshire on its 50th anniversary of becoming an Agreement State. 

On April 29, 1966, Governor John W. King entered into an Agreement with the Atomic Energy 

Commission to assume regulatory responsibility for certain radioactive materials under 

Section 274 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Agreement). This made New 

Hampshire the 12th State to become an “Agreement State,” effective May 16, 1966. 

 We commend the State on its successful efforts throughout the years in regulating the 

safe use of radioactive materials in New Hampshire, thereby protecting public health and safety, 

as was committed to in the Agreement. We encourage your continued support of the important 

services provided by the Agreement State program. 

 We wish you continued success in these efforts and look forward to our agencies 

continuing to work cooperatively in the future. Please extend our congratulations to the staff 

and management of the New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services for their 

successful implementation of the New Hampshire Agreement State program. 

 Sincerely, 

 /RA/ 

 Stephen G. Burns 

cc: Augustinus Ong
No: IV-15-009 April 1, 2015

CONTACT: Victor Dricks (817) 200-1128

 Lara Uselding (817) 200-1519

 NRC Schedules Regulatory Conference to Discuss Apparent Violation at Waterford 3

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with officials from Entergy Operations on 

April 7 to discuss a preliminary inspection finding associated with the reliability of the plant’s 

emergency diesel generators. The plant is located in Killona, La.

 The 9 a.m. meeting at the NRC’s Region IV office at 1600 E. Lamar Blvd., Arlington, Texas, 

is open to the public. NRC officials will answer questions from the public after the business portion of 

the conference. A telephone bridge will be available for the meeting by calling 1-888-957-9871 and 

entering passcode 2489913.

 The NRC evaluates regulatory performance at commercial nuclear plants with a color-coded 

process that classifies inspection findings as green, white, yellow or red in order of increasing safety 

significance. The NRC has preliminarily determined that the inspection finding has greater than very 

low (green) safety significance which may require additional inspections, regulatory actions and 

oversight.

 The finding is associated with a vent pipe on the roof of a building that had corrosion that 

could allow rainwater to contaminate fuel oil for the plant’s emergency diesel generators, affecting their 

operability. The generators are used to supply back-up power for safety-related systems in the event of 

a loss of off-site power. The violation is identified in an NRC inspection report issued on Jan 22.

 No decision on the final safety significance of the finding or any additional NRC actions will 

be made at the conference. That decision will be announced at a later time.
No: 14-051 August 19, 2014

CONTACT: Ivonne Couret, 301-415-8200 

NRC Awards FY14 Nuclear Education Grants

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has awarded $15 million in grants to academic institutions 

in fiscal year 2014 through the Nuclear Education Program. The grants are used for scholarships, 

fellowships, trade school and community college scholarships and faculty development. 

Congress authorized the NRC, through the Nuclear Education Program, to provide federal 

funding opportunities to qualified academic institutions to encourage careers and research in nuclear, 

mechanical and electrical engineering, health physics and related fields to meet expected future 

workforce needs. This fiscal year, the NRC awarded 49 grants to 37 higher education institutions, 

including Minority Serving Institutions, located in 23 states and Puerto Rico. These grants will help to 

develop a future workforce capable of designing, constructing, operating and regulating the next 

generation of nuclear facilities.

“There is both a domestic and world-wide need for highly qualified nuclear professionals to 

keep nuclear power plants and nuclear materials safe and secure,” said NRC Chairman Allison 

Macfarlane. “As a safety regulator, the NRC is pleased to sponsor these grant programs as they offer 

college and university recipients an opportunity to encourage their best and brightest to pursue careers 

in nuclear engineering, health physics, radiochemistry, and related sciences.”

The NRC announces grant opportunities on www.grants.gov, which helps the public find and 

apply for federal funding opportunities. A panel of expert reviewers evaluates all the grant proposals. 

The panel composition is diverse with most reviewers having both experience reviewing proposals for 

government agencies and advanced credentials in nuclear engineering, health physics, radiochemistry 

or related disciples. Each panelist has to certify that they do not have any conflict of interests for the 

proposals they evaluate.

With the award of the FY14 grants, the NRC Nuclear Education Program has awarded nearly 

$122 million since the program began in 2007. 

The complete list of grants awarded is posted on the NRC’s website along with more 

information on the NRC’s Nuclear Education Program.
### §13925. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 13925 was editorially reclassified as section 12291 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
#### § 141.2 Definitions.

For the purposes of this part the following definitions will apply:

*Agency* means an executive agency as defined at 5 U.S.C. 105 including the U.S. Postal Service, the U.S. Postal Commission, a military department as defined at 5 U.S.C. 102, an agency or court in the judicial branch, an agency of the legislative branch including the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives and other independent establishments that are entities of the Federal government.

*Creditor agency* means the agency to which the debt is owed.

*Debt* means an amount owed to the United States from sources which include loans insured or guaranteed by the United States and all other amounts due the United States from fees, leases, rents, royalties, services, sales of real or personal property, overpayments, penalties, damages, interests, fines, forfeitures (except those arising under the Uniform Code of Military Justice), and all other similar sources.

*Disposable pay* means the amount that remains from an employee's federal pay after required deductions for social security, federal, state or local income tax, health insurance premiums, retirement contributions, life insurance premiums, federal employment taxes, and any other deductions that are required to be withheld by law.

*Hearing official* means an individual responsible for conducting any hearing with respect to the existence or amount of a debt claimed, and who renders a decision on the basis of such hearing. A hearing official shall be an impartial member of the Office of the Executive Director not under the supervision or control of the head of the Commission.

*Paying agency* means the agency that employs the individual who owes the debt and authorizes the payment of his/her current pay.

*Salary offset* means an administrative offset to collect a debt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 5514 by deduction(s) at one or more officially established pay intervals from the current pay account of an employee without his/her consent.
§ 306.8 Certification. If you are a distributor, you must certify the automotive fuel rating of the automotive fuel in each transfer you make to anyone who is not a consumer. ( a ) In the case of gasoline, if you do not blend the gasoline with other gasoline, you must certify the gasoline's octane rating consistent with the octane rating certified to you. If you blend the gasoline with other gasoline, you must certify consistent with your determination of the average, weighted by volume, of the octane ratings certified to you for each gasoline in the blend, or consistent with the lowest octane rating certified to you for any gasoline in the blend. Whether you blend gasoline or not, you may choose to certify the octane rating of the gasoline consistent with your determination of the octane rating according to the method in § 306.5. In cases involving gasoline, the octane rating may be rounded to a whole or half number equal to or less than the number certified to you or determined by you.
( b ) If you do not blend alternative liquid automotive fuels, you must certify consistent with the automotive fuel rating certified to you. If you blend alternative liquid automotive fuels, you must possess a reasonable basis, consisting of competent and reliable evidence, for the automotive fuel rating that you certify for the blend.
( c ) You may certify either by using a delivery ticket with each transfer of automotive fuel, as outlined in § 306.6(a), or by using a letter of certification, as outlined in § 306.6(b).
( d ) When you transfer automotive fuel to a common carrier, you must certify the automotive fuel rating of the automotive fuel to the common carrier, either by letter or on the delivery ticket or other paper. When you receive automotive fuel from a common carrier, you also must receive from the common carrier a certification of the automotive fuel rating of the automotive fuel, either by letter or on the delivery ticket or other paper.
[58 FR 41374, Aug. 3, 1993, as amended at 59 FR 48798, Sept. 23, 1994]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Cause No. DA 2 1

- 0604

M.K. WEEDEN CONSTRUCTION,

INC., Applicant and Appellee

,

vs.

SIMBECK AND ASSOCIATES, INC.,

Respondent and Appellant

. ) ) )
) ) ) ) ) ) GRANT OF EXTENSION

Having reviewed Appellee M .K. Weeden Construction, Inc. ’ s Unopposed

Motion for Extension of Time, and the Court having found good cause therein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee M.K. Weeden Co nstruction, Inc.

shall have an extension t o and including March 30 , 2022 , to file its response brief.

SO ORDERED.

DONE AND DATED by electronic signature as indicated below.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court February 15 2022

02/15/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0604
#### Max Weiner, Appellant, v. Dorothy Weiner, Respondent.

Orders unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Breitel and Bergan, JJ.
§ 602.1 Effective dates. ( a ) - ( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) The applicable provisions of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 (FACT Act), Pub. L. 108-159, 117 Stat. 1952, shall be effective in accordance with the following schedule: ( 1 ) *Provisions effective December 31, 2003.* ( i ) Sections 151(a)(2), 212(e), 214(c), 311(b), and 711, concerning the relation to state laws; and
( ii ) Each of the provisions of the FACT Act that authorizes an agency to issue a regulation or to take other action to implement the applicable provision of the FACT Act or the applicable provision of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, as amended by the FACT Act, but only with respect to that agency's authority to propose and adopt the implementing regulation or to take such other action.
( 2 ) *Provisions effective March 31, 2004.* ( i ) Section 111, concerning the definitions;
( ii ) Section 156, concerning the statute of limitations
( iii ) Sections 312(d), (e), and (f), concerning the furnisher liability exception, liability and enforcement, and rule of construction, respectively;
( iv ) Section 313(a), concerning action regarding complaints;
( v ) Section 611, concerning communications for certain employee investigations; and
( vi ) Section 811, concerning clerical amendments.
( 3 ) *Provisions effective December 1, 2004.* ( i ) Section 112, concerning fraud alerts and active duty alerts;
( ii ) Section 114, concerning procedures for the identification of possible instances of identity theft;
( iii ) Section 115, concerning truncation of the social security number in a consumer report;
( iv ) Section 151(a)(1), concerning the summary of rights of identity theft victims;
( v ) Section 152, concerning blocking of information resulting from identity theft;
( vi ) Section 153, concerning the coordination of identity theft complaint investigations;
( vii ) Section 154, concerning the prevention of repollution of consumer reports;
( viii ) Section 155, concerning notice by debt collectors with respect to fraudulent information;
( ix ) Section 211(c), concerning a summary of rights of consumers;
( x ) Section 212(a)-(d), concerning the disclosure of credit scores;
( xi ) Section 213(c), concerning duration of elections;
( xii ) Section 217(a), concerning the duty to provide notice to a consumer;
( xiii ) Section 311(a), concerning the risk-based pricing notice;
( xiv ) Section 312(a)-(c), concerning procedures to enhance the accuracy and integrity of information furnished to consumer reporting agencies;
( xv ) Section 314, concerning improved disclosure of the results of reinvestigation;
( xvi ) Section 315, concerning reconciling addresses;
( xvii ) Section 316, concerning notice of dispute through reseller; and
( xviii ) Section 317, concerning the duty to conduct a reasonable reinvestigation.
[69 FR 29063, May 20, 2004]
ENCLOSURE 3 

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION RECORD 

The complete record of public participation activities is located at the Air Division of the 

Department of Environmental Quality. The department contact to access this 

information is the Director, Air Division. 

The state did not receive testimony on this particular revision. 

TEMPLATES\SIP-REG\REG03-b2 

SIP\NONATTN PLANS\2011\E10-SIP-3.DOC