alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: May 21, 2010  | By:    | /s/ Tae Heum Jeong      |   |
|---------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|                      |   | Tae Heum Jeong,    |   |
|                      |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |

| * | This Certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This Certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing. |
|---|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
#### ROGERS et al. v. PENOBSCOT MINING CO. et al.

An abstract on appeal of 869 pages which, might easily have been condensed to 100 pages will not be considered.

Corson, J., dissenting.

(Opinion filed, July 1, 1910.)

Appeal From Circuit Court, Rawrence County. Hon. Wiuuiam G. Rice;, Judge.

Action by Burt Rogers and others against the Penobscot Mining Company and others. From a judgment for plaintiffs and an order denying a new trial, defendants appeal.

Affirmed.

*McLcmghlin*& *Ogden*and *A. J. Ploivman,*for appellants. *Chambers Kellar, Eben W. Martin,*and *Norman T. Mason,*for respondents.

McCOY, J.

Whatever merit there may be in appellants’ contention is concealed beneath an avalanche of immaterial matter contained in 869 pages, termed “abstract,” which, with some little labor, might easily have been condensed within 100 pages. For all the reasons stated in Farrar v. Yankton Rand & Investment Co., 23 S. D. 525, 122 N. W. 585, and State v. McCallum, 23 S. D. 528, 122 N. W. 586, and a great many more of the same character, the court has not considered appellant’s abstract.

The judgment of the circuit court and the order denying a new trial are affirmed.

CORSON, J., dissenting.
### Part C—Clean Fuel Vehicles
#### Sophie Buchsbaum, Appellant, v. Julius Buchsbaum, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents and votes to affirm.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION - ELIMINATION C fq

MD 10.15 MERIT STAFFING PROGRAM DT-15-10

Volume 10,

Part 2:

Personnel Management

Position Evaluation and Management, Pay Administration, and Leave

Approved By: Mark A. Satorius

Executive Director for Operations

Date Approved: May 5, 2015

Expiration Date: May 5, 2020

Issuing Office: Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer 

Human Resources Policy and Programs Team

Contact Name: Alison Tallarico

301-287-0740

Servicing Human Resources Specialist 

(names and phone numbers are listed here) 

Subject: Elimination of MD 10.15 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Guidance found in Management Directive (MD) 10.15, "Merit Staffing Program," has been 

updated and consolidated and may now be found in MD 10.1, "Recruitment, Appointments, 

and Merit Staffing." Therefore, MD 10.15 is eliminated.

Directive and Handbook 10.1 consolidate and revise the following guidance:

• Practices relating to employment and policies and practices regarding merit staffing

activities within the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission;

• Policy, practices, and procedures for recruiting highly qualified applicants for vacant

positions within the NRC; and

• Guidance for NRC employees who participate on recruiting trips or other recruiting

activities.
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Kiyoshi Mogi, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 59876;

First District (5th Division)

July 12, 1974.

Lester H. Broussard, of Chicago, for appellant.

Bernard Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago (Patrick T. Driscoll, Jr., and Lorence H. Slutzky, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel), for the People.

Opinion by

Mr. JUSTICE DRUCKER.
§ 766.18 Settlement. ( a ) *Cases may be settled before service of a charging letter.* In cases in which settlement is reached before service of a charging letter, a proposed charging letter will be prepared, and a settlement proposal consisting of a settlement agreement and order will be submitted to the Assistant Secretary for approval and signature. If the Assistant Secretary does not approve the proposal, he/she will notify the parties and the case will proceed as though no settlement proposal had been made. If the Assistant Secretary approves the proposal, he/she will issue an appropriate order, and no action will be required by the administrative law judge.
( b ) *Cases may also be settled after service of a charging letter.* ( 1 ) If the case is pending before the administrative law judge, the judge shall stay the proceedings for a reasonable period of time, usually not to exceed 30 days, upon notification by the parties that they have entered into good faith settlement negotiations. The administrative law judge may, in his/her discretion, grant additional stays. If settlement is reached, a proposal will be submitted to the Assistant Secretary for approval and signature. If the Assistant Secretary approves the proposal, he/she will issue an appropriate order, and notify the administrative law judge that the case is withdrawn from adjudication. If the Assistant Secretary does not approve the proposal, he/she will notify the parties and the case will proceed to adjudication by the administrative law judge as though no settlement proposal had been made.
( 2 ) If the case is pending before the Under Secretary under § 766.21 or § 766.22 of this part, the parties may submit a settlement proposal to the Under Secretary for approval and signature. If the Under Secretary approves the proposal, he/she will issue an appropriate order. If the Under Secretary does not approve the proposal, the case will proceed to final decision in accordance with § 766.21 or § 766.22 of this part, as appropriate.
( c ) Any order disposing of a case by settlement may suspend the administrative sanction imposed, in whole or in part, on such terms of probation or other conditions as the signing official may specify. Any such suspension may be modified or revoked by the signing official, in accordance with the procedures set forth in § 766.17(c) of this part.
( d ) Any respondent who agrees to an order imposing any administrative sanction does so solely for the purpose of resolving the claims in the administrative enforcement proceeding brought under this part. This reflects the fact that BIS has neither the authority nor the responsibility for instituting, conducting, settling, or otherwise disposing of criminal proceedings. That authority and responsibility are vested in the Attorney General and the Department of Justice.
( e ) Cases that are settled may not be reopened or appealed.
( f ) Supplements nos. 1 and 2 to this part describe how BIS typically exercises its discretion regarding the terms under which it is willing to settle particular cases.
[61 FR 12907, Mar. 25, 1996, as amended at 69 FR 7870, Feb. 20, 2004; 72 FR 39006, July 17, 2007]
### §1395w–29. Repealed. Pub. L. 111–152, title I, §1102(f), Mar. 30, 2010, 124 Stat. 1046

Section, act Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XVIII, §1860C–1, as added Pub. L. 108–173, title II, §241(a), Dec. 8, 2003, 117 Stat. 2214; amended Pub. L. 111–148, title III, §3201(a)(2)(D), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 444; Pub. L. 111–152, title I, §1102(a), Mar. 30, 2010, 124 Stat. 1040, related to comparative cost adjustment program.
NRC NEWS

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION III

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle IL 60532

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663/e-mail: rjs2@nrc.gov

Angela Greenman (630) 829-9662/e-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-96-25 June 14, 1996

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 708/829-9663

 Angela Dauginas 708/829-9662

 E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

 NRC STAFF PROPOSES $100,000 FINE AGAINST COMMONWEALTH EDISON

 FOR VIOLATIONS INVOLVING STRUCTURAL STEEL DESIGN DEFICIENCIES

 AT DRESDEN AND QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATIONS

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed

$100,000 in fines against Commonwealth Edison Company for design

deficiencies at its Dresden and Quad Cities Nuclear Power

Stations.

 The two plants are similar in design, and each has two

reactors. Dresden is located near Morris, Illinois, and Quad

Cities is in Cordova, Illinois.

 The utility was cited for failing to promptly correct design

deficiencies in structural steel beams and supports for

components in one of the plants' emergency core cooling systems. 

A $50,000 fine was proposed for each facility for a total fine of

$100,000 to the utility.

 In 1991 the utility's architect-engineer determined that

modifications to pipe supports and structural steel in the 1980's

had not been evaluated to determine their effect on seismic

design criteria. (Safety-related plant structures and systems

must be designed to function during and after an earthquake.)

 The modifications resulted in additional loads on the steel

beams and supports which, in some cases, exceeded those permitted

in the original plant design.

 These deficiencies were not corrected until February 1996 at

Quad Cities and until March 1996 for Dresden Unit 2. The Dresden

Unit 3 deficiencies will be corrected in the Fall 1996 refueling

outage.

 "We are concerned that the engineering decision process

failed to ensure timely action to restore design margins," said

NRC Regional Administrator Hubert J. Miller in notifying the

utilities of the proposed fines. "Commonwealth Edison personnel

were aware of the design deficiency for over five years without

effective resolution."

 The utility has until July 15 to pay the fine or to protest

it. If Commonwealth Edison protests the fine and it is

subsequently imposed by the NRC staff, the utility may request a

hearing.
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Shirley L. Tyler, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of United Heritage Bankshares of Florida,Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.           Date: May 6, 2005   By: /s/ Shirley L. Tyler                     Shirley L. Tyler, Executive Vice President              and Treasurer  
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §12906. Grants for AIDS housing information and coordination services

Grants under this section may only be used for the following activities:

#### (1) Housing information services

To provide (or contract to provide) counseling, information, and referral services to assist eligible persons to locate, acquire, finance, and maintain housing and meet their housing needs.

#### (2) Resource identification

To identify, coordinate, and develop housing assistance resources (including conducting preliminary research and making expenditures necessary to determine the feasibility of specific housing-related initiatives) for eligible persons.

(Pub. L. 101–625, title VIII, §857, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4379; Pub. L. 102–550, title VI, §606(j)(11)(B), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3811.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pars. (1), (2). Pub. L. 102–550 substituted "eligible persons" for "individuals with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome or related diseases".
§ 1750.5 Detailed requirements. ( a ) *Releasing forces.* As determined by the tests prescribed by § 1750.6, the device: ( 1 ) Shall permit the refrigerator door to be opened on the application of a force equivalent to one which, if directed perpendicularly to the plane of the door and applied anywhere along the latch edge of the inside of the closed door, shall not exceed 66.7 newtons (15 pounds);
( 2 ) Shall permit the refrigerator door to be opened on the application of clockwise or counterclockwise turning moment of not more than 0.57 newton-meter (5 inch-pounds) to a knob on the door through an angle of rotation of 45° ±15° in either direction; or
( 3 ) Shall function automatically to permit the door to be opened with a force of 66.7 newtons (15 pounds) or less applied as described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section whenever space(s) exist(s) or is (are) created with dimensions and volumes exceeding the dimensions and volumes imposed by § 1750.3.
( b ) *Description and location of knob(s).* The knob(s) shall resemble a conventional doorknob in shape and size and shall be mounted near the latch side of the door extending into the cabinet at least 6.3 millimeters (1 ⁄ 4 inch) beyond any inner door surface within a 15.2-centimeter (6-inch) radius of the knob center. The knob(s) shall be mounted in such a manner that there is a minimum of 19.0-millimeter (3 ⁄ 4-inch) clearance between the inner periphery of the knob(s) and adjacent inner door surfaces. The knob(s) shall be located so as to provide the accessibility required by § 1750.3.
( c ) *Wear.* The device shall comply with the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section after 300,000 cycles of operation of the door as determined by the tests prescribed by § 1750.6.
( d ) *Protection against adverse effects from spillage, cleaning, defrosting, and condensation.* Devices shall be designed so that spillage of foods or beverages, cleaning or defrosting in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations, or normal condensation will not so adversely affect the operation of the device as to result in its failure to meet the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, as determined by the tests prescribed by § 1750.6.
( e ) *Devices which permit door to be opened as a result of forces or turning moments applied to movable components inside the refrigerator.* Those components of a device upon which the safety features of the device depend shall not break, crack, permanently deform, nor show other visible damage when subjected to forces and moments specified in the tests under § 1750.6(c). The requirements of paragraph (a) of this section shall be satisfied after the device has been subjected to the tests under § 1750.6(c).
( f ) *Power supply.* The device shall operate in accordance with the requirements of this standard with the electric, gas, or other fuel supply either on or off.
### §12832. Nondiscrimination

No person in the United States shall on the grounds of race, color, national origin, religion, or sex be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity funded in whole or in part with funds made available under this subchapter. Any prohibition against discrimination on the basis of age under the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 [42 U.S.C. 6101 et seq.] or with respect to an otherwise qualified handicapped individual as provided in section 794 of title 29 shall also apply to any such program or activity. The Secretary may waive this section in connection with the use of funds made available under this subchapter on lands set aside under the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 1920 (42 Stat. 108).

(Pub. L. 101–625, title II, §282, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4125; Pub. L. 104–204, title II, §213, Sept. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 2904.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, referred to in text, is title III of Pub. L. 94–135, Nov. 28, 1975, 89 Stat. 728, which is classified generally to chapter 76 (§6101 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 6101 of this title and Tables.

The Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 1920, referred to in text, is act July 9, 1921, ch. 42, 42 Stat. 108, which was classified generally to sections 691 to 718 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions, and was omitted from the Code.

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–204 inserted at end "The Secretary may waive this section in connection with the use of funds made available under this subchapter on lands set aside under the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 1920 (42 Stat. 108)."
```

[104th Congress Public Law 312]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ312.104]

[[Page 110 STAT. 3819]]

Public Law 104-312
104th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To authorize appropriations for a mining institute or institutes to 
develop domestic technological capabilities for the recovery of minerals 
   from the Nation's seabed, and for other purposes. <<NOTE: Oct. 19, 
                         1996 -  [H.R. 3249]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SEABED MINERALS.

    (a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 2(a) of the Mining and 
Mineral Resources Research Institute Act of 1984 (30 U.S.C. 1222(a)) is 
amended by adding the following at the end thereof:
``There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary not more than 
$1,800,000 for each of the fiscal years after fiscal year 1996 to be 
made available by the Secretary to an institute or institutes 
experienced in investigating the continental shelf regions of the United 
States, the deep seabed and near shore environments of islands, and the 
Arctic and cold water regions as a source for nonfuel minerals. Such 
funds are to be used by the institute or institutes to assist in 
developing domestic technological capabilities required for the location 
of, and the efficient and environmentally sound recovery of, minerals 
(other than oil and gas) from the Nation's shallow and deep seabed.''.
    (b) Short Title.--Section 11 of such Act (30 U.S.C. 1201 note) is 
amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 11. <<NOTE: Mining and Mineral Resources Institutes Act.>> SHORT 
            TITLE.

    ``This Act may be cited as the `Mining and Mineral Resources 
Institutes Act'.''.

    Approved October 19, 1996.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3249:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104-673 (Comm. on Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 142 (1996):
            July 16, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 3, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
SABIT Accepting Applications

----