alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Allonge to the Common Stock Purchase Warrant (Warrant No. NS2007-1)



 Exhibit 4.5 
 ALLONGE TO COMMON STOCK PURCHASE WARRANT 
 (Warrant No. NS2007-1) 
 This Allonge dated and entered into this 30th
 day of May, 2007 to the Common Stock Purchase Warrant, Warrant No. NS2007-1, to Purchase 2,125,000 Shares of Common Stock of Transmeridian Exploration Incorporated (the “Warrant”)
is made by Transmeridian Exploration Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) for the benefit of North Sound Legacy Institutional Fund LLC, the current holder of the Warrant, for itself and its registered assigns
(the “Holder”). 
 WHEREAS, on May 30, 2007, the Holder pre-paid (the
“Prepayment”) the Company $1.99 of the Current Warrant Price of $2.00 per share for 500,000 shares of Warrant Stock (the “Prepayment Warrant Stock”), the receipt of which the Company desires to
acknowledge; and 
 WHEREAS, in order to evidence receipt of the Prepayment and the effect thereof on the Current Warrant Price applicable to
the Prepayment Warrant Stock, the Company desires to acknowledge the decrease in the Current Warrant Price applicable to the Prepayment Warrant Stock from $2.00 to $0.01 per share, while leaving all other terms of the Warrant unaffected thereby.

 NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration (including the Prepayment) and intending to be legally bound hereby, the Company
agrees as follows: 
  

	 	(1)	The Company by its execution hereof hereby acknowledges receipt of the full amount of the Prepayment. 

  

	 	(2)	Giving effect to the Prepayment, the Company acknowledges and agrees that the Current Warrant Price applicable to the Prepayment Warrant Stock is $0.01 per share, until the Current
Warrant Price is adjusted pursuant to the terms of the Warrant. 

  

	 	(3)	Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein are used with the meanings ascribed thereto in the Warrant. 

  

	 	(4)	Except as expressly reflected herein, the Warrant shall be unamended and remain in full force and effect. 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Transmeridian Exploration Incorporated has caused this Allonge to Common Stock
Purchase Warrant to be executed by its duly authorized officer and attested by its Secretary. 
 Dated: May 30, 2007 
  

											
		  		  		 	TRANSMERIDIAN EXPLORATION INCORPORATED	 	
						
		  		  		 	By:	 	 /s/ Earl W. McNiel
	 	
		  		  		 		 	Earl W. McNiel	 	
		  		  		 		 	Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	 	
					
	Attest:	  		 		 		 	
						
	By:	  	 /s/ Nicolas J. Evanoff
	  		 		 		 	
		  	Nicolas J. Evanoff	  		 		 		 	
		  	Secretary
#### The People of the State of New *Y*ork, Respondent, v. Vito Rizzi, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Callahan and Breitel, JJ.
#### Le Trat Realty Corporation, Appellant, v. George Fox et al., Respondents.

Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Shientag, JJ.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3826 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to extend the reduced interest 

rate for Federal Direct Stafford Loans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2012 

Mr. COURTNEY (for himself, Mr. PETERS, Mr. REYES, Mr. HINOJOSA, Mr. 

JACKSON of Illinois, Mr. BRALEY of Iowa, Mr. STARK, Mr. CLARKE of 

Michigan, Mr. GRIJALVA, and Ms. NORTON) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to extend 

the reduced interest rate for Federal Direct Stafford Loans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INTEREST RATE EXTENSION. 

4 Subparagraph (D) of section 455(b)(7) of the Higher 

5 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(b)(7)) is amend6 ed— 

7 (1) in the matter preceding clause (i), by strik8 ing ‘‘and before July 1, 2012,’’; and 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 3826 IH

1 (2) in clause (v), by striking ‘‘and before July 

2 1, 2012,’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Caliber Energy, Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the period ending  September  30, 2005, as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, David  Naylor,
Principal  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/S/     David Naylor
David Naylor
Treasurer, CFO and Director
(Principal Financial Officer)



November 4, 2005


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 1500.123 Condensation of label information.

Whenever the statement of the principal hazard or hazards itself provides the precautionary measures to be followed or avoided, a clear statement of the principal hazard will satisfy the requirements of section 2(p)(1) (E) and (F) of the act (repeated in § 1500.3(b)(14)(i) (E) and (F)). When the statement of precautionary measures in effect provides instruction for first-aid treatment, the statement of the precautionary measures will satisfy the requirements of section 2(p)(1) (F) and (G) of the act (repeated in § 1500.3(b)(14)(i) (F) and (G)).
Exhibit 32.1

I, Richard J. DeVries, President and
Chief Executive Officer of Pavilion Bancorp, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 which           this
statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)           or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | the
information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
          December 31, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
          condition and results of operations of Pavilion Bancorp, Inc.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated:  November 16, 2005

| |  | /s/ Richard J. DeVries
Richard J. DeVriesPresident and Chief Executive Officer
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Salomon Smith Barney AAA Energy Fund L.P. II (the"Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the periodending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr., Chief Financial Officer and Director ofCitigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities         Exchange Act of1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial         conditionand results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe,Jr.

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

Daniel R.McAuliffe, Jr. Citigroup Managed Futures LLC Chief FinancialOfficer and Director

November 9,2005

----
#### Marshall C. Rumsey, Respondent-Appellant, v. Deere & Company, Defendant, and John Deere Plow Company of Syracuse, Inc.. Appellant-Respondent.

Memorandum : The matters upon which an examination of appellant-respondent is sought are not shown to be material and necessary to the prosecution of the action. All concur. (The order grants an examination of defendant John Deere Plow Company before trial and directs plaintiff to serve within ten days after such examination a verified bill of particulars as to certain allegations.) Present— Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Merci, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report), I, Jose Acevedo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  August 19, 2008 /s/ Jose Acevedo
 Chief Financial Officer
exv10w3



 





Exhibit 10.3




AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO THE EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT OF

PATRICK H. DUDASIK



AMENDMENT NO. 1, dated as of June 1, 2007 (“Amendment No. 1”), to the Executive Employment
Agreement of Patrick H. Dudasik dated as of October 26, 2004 (the “Agreement”), by and among
Calamos Asset Management, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Calamos Advisors LLC., a Delaware Limited
Liability Company, and Patrick H. Dudasik, an individual.



WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 14 of the Agreement, the parties hereto desire to amend the terms of
the Agreement to reflect a certain revision.



NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:





	 	1.	 	Amendment. Section 4(c)(i)(B)(2) of the Agreement is hereby amended to provide
as follows: “any material adverse change in the status, position or responsibilities of
Executive, including a change in Executive’s reporting relationship;”.
	 
	 	2.	 	Reaffirmation. In all other respects the Agreement remains the same and in
full force and effect.
	 
	 	3.	 	Effective Date. This Amendment No. 1 shall become effective as of the date
first written above (the “Effective Date”). On and after the Effective Date of this
Amendment No. 1, each reference in the Agreement to “this Agreement,” “hereunder,”
“hereof,” or words of like import referring to the Agreement shall mean and be a reference
to the Agreement as amended by this Amendment No. 1.
	 
	 	4.	 	Governing Law. The validity and construction of this Amendment No. 1 shall be
determined and governed in all respects by the laws of the State of Illinois without regard
to conflict of laws principles.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 1 as of the day and year
first written above.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	CALAMOS ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC.	 	 	 	PATRICK H. DUDASIK	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:

Its:
	 	/s/ John P. Calamos, Sr.
 

Chairman, CEO & Co-CIO
 

	 	 	 	 /s/
Patrick H. Dudasik
 

	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	CALAMOS ADVISORS LLC	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:

Its:
	 	/s/ Patrick H. Dudasik
 

EVP, COO, CFO & Treasurer
§ 265.16 Parking. No person, unless otherwise authorized by a posted traffic sign or directed by a uniformed guard, shall stand or park a motor vehicle: ( a ) On a sidewalk;
( b ) Within an intersection or within a crosswalk;
( c ) Within 15 feet of a fire hydrant, 5 feet of a driveway or 30 feet of a stop sign or traffic control device;
( d ) At any place which would result in the vehicle being double parked;
( e ) At curbs painted yellow;
( f ) In a direction facing on-coming traffic;
( g ) In a manner which would obstruct traffic;
( h ) In a parking space marked as not intended for his use;
( i ) Where directed not to do so by a uniformed guard;
( j ) Except in an area specifically designated for parking or standing;
( k ) Except within a single space marked for such purposes, when parking or standing in an area with marked spaces;
( l ) At any place in violation of any posted sign; or
( m ) In excess of 24 hours, unless permission has been granted by the Physical Security office.
Second Department,

October, 1951.

(October 1, 1951.)

#### Jack Badash, Respondent, v. Boris B. Levitt, Appellant.

No opinion. Carswell, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
# C_2020390EN.01002701.xml

| 16.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 390/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 390/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Hypo Vorarlberg Bank v SRB

(Case T-414/17) (1)

(Economic and monetary union - Banking union - Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Single Resolution Fund (SRF) - Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2017 ex ante contributions - Action for annulment - Direct and individual concern - Admissibility - Essential procedural requirements - Authentication of the decision - Obligation to state reasons - Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment)

(2020/C 390/37)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Hypo Vorarlberg Bank AG, formerly Vorarlberger Landes- und Hypothekenbank AG (Bregenz, Austria) (represented by: G. Eisenberger and A. Brenneis, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: P. Messina and J. Kerlin, acting as Agents, and B. Meyring, S. Schelo, T. Klupsch and S. Ianc, lawyers)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the SRB in its executive session of 11 April 2017 on the calculation of the 2017 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/SRF/2017/05), in so far as it concerns the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | annuls the decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) in its executive session of 11 April 2017 on the calculation of the 2017 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/SRF/2017/05), in so far as it concerns Hypo Vorarlberg Bank AG; |
| --- | --- |

1.

annuls the decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) in its executive session of 11 April 2017 on the calculation of the 2017 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/SRF/2017/05), in so far as it concerns Hypo Vorarlberg Bank AG;

| 2. | orders the SRB to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Hypo Vorarlberg Bank. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders the SRB to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Hypo Vorarlberg Bank.

---

(1)  OJ C 277, 21.8.2017.

---
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 26 (Monday, February 9, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 5988]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2663]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. 225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than February 23, 2004.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. Nicholas, 
Community Affairs Officer) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. Claire L. Erickson, Hudson, Wisconsin, and Marilyn J. Kron, 
Hudson, Wisconsin; to acquire voting shares of Waseca Bancshares, Inc., 
Waseca, Minnesota, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of 
Roundbank, Waseca, Minnesota, and American Savings, Inc., Farmington, 
Minnesota.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 3, 
2004.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 04-2663 Filed 2-6-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
#### In the Matter of Lucy G. Kinsella, Appellant.

Appeal dismissed for failure to comply with previous order, without costs.
#### In the Matter of Yevgenia Shockome, Petitioner, v Damian Amodeo, as Judge of the Family Court, Dutchess County, et al., Respondents.

[820 NYS2d 810]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition and mandamus, inter alia, to prohibit Damian Amodeo, a Judge of the Family Court, Dutchess County, from proceeding in a matter entitled *Matter of Shockome v Shockome,*pending in that court under docket Nos. V-5156-02, V-5157-02, V-5620-02, V-5621-02, and V-5362-02.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

“Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court — in cases where judicial authority is challenged — acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers” *(Matter of Holtzman v Goldman,*71 NY2d 564, 569 [1988]; *see Matter of Rush v Mordue,*68 NY2d 348, 352 [1986]). Similarly, the extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act and only when there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought *(see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman,*53 NY2d 12, 16 [1981]).

The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Adams, J.P., Santucci, Lunn and Dillon, JJ., concur.
June 22, 2015 

The Honorable Jason Chaffetz 

Chairman, Committee on Oversight 

 and Government Reform 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

Dear Mr. Chairman: 

 On behalf of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), I am responding to your 

letter of June 8, 2015, requesting information regarding assessment and collection of fines and 

penalties at the NRC. Responses to your specific information requests are enclosed. 

 I do want to note, in particular, that funds collected from fines and penalties levied by the 

NRC are not retained by the agency, but rather are turned over to the U.S. Treasury as 

miscellaneous receipts. 

 If you need any additional information, please contact me or Eugene Dacus, Director of 

the Office of Congressional Affairs, at (301) 415-1776. 

 Sincerely, 

 /RA/ 

 Stephen G. Burns 

Enclosure: 

As stated 
Identical letter sent to: 

The Honorable Jason Chaffetz 

Chairman, Committee on Oversight 

 and Government Reform 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

The Honorable Elijah E. Cummings 

Ranking Member, Committee on Oversight 

 and Government Reform 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

The Honorable Jim Jordan 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Health Care, 

 Benefits and Administrative Rules 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**ABIGAIL MULLER,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**THE AQUATIC AND FITNESS CENTER D/B/A AFC JENKINTOWN, AQUA HAB,** 

**L.P. D/B/A THE AQUATIC AND FITNESS CENTER AT JENKINTOWN, AQUA HAB,** 

**L.P. AND KYLE DONOHUE :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 380 EAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 8th day of February, 2016, the Petition for A llowance of Appeal** 

**is** DENIED

**.**

**Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this** 

**matter.**
Editorial Note on Part 922
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

§ 922.213 Prohibited or otherwise regulated activities. ( a ) Except as specified in paragraph (b) of this section, the following activities are prohibited and thus are unlawful for any person to conduct or to cause to be conducted: ( 1 ) Moving, removing, recovering, altering, destroying, possessing, or otherwise injuring, or attempting to move, remove, recover, alter, destroy, possess or otherwise injure a sanctuary resource.
( 2 ) Grappling into or anchoring on shipwreck sites.
( 3 ) Interfering with, obstructing, delaying or preventing an investigation, search, seizure or disposition of seized property in connection with enforcement of the Act or any regulation or any permit issued under the Act.
( b ) The prohibitions in paragraphs (a)(1) through (3) of this section do not apply to any activity necessary to respond to an emergency threatening life, property, or the environment; or to activities necessary for valid law enforcement purposes.
Editorial Note
Editorial Note: At 86 FR 32757, June 23, 2021, § 922.213(a)(2) was stayed until Oct. 1, 2023. At 88 FR 67067, Sept. 29, 2023, the stay of § 922.213(a)(2) was extended until Oct. 1, 2024.