alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 90.3 Definitions. As used in this part (except where the context clearly indicates otherwise) the following definitions shall apply: ( a ) *Census Bureau* means the U.S. Census Bureau, Department of Commerce.
( b ) *Population Estimates Challenge* means, in accordance with this part, the process a governmental unit may use to provide additional input data for the Census Bureau's population estimate and the submission of substantive documentation in support thereof.
( c ) *Director* means Director of the Census Bureau, or an individual designated by the Director to perform under this part.
( d ) *Population estimate* means a statistically developed calculation of the number of people living in a governmental unit to update the preceding census or earlier estimate.
( e ) A *governmental unit* means the government of a county, municipality, township, incorporated place, or other minor civil division, which is a unit of general-purpose government below the State.
( f ) A *non-functioning county or statistical equivalent* means a sub-State entity that does not function as an active general-purpose governmental unit. This situation exists in Connecticut, Rhode Island, for selected counties in Massachusetts, and for the Census Areas in Alaska.
( g ) For the purposes of this program, an *eligible governmental unit* also includes the District of Columbia and non-functioning counties or statistical equivalents represented by a FSCPE member agency.
# FILED

April 1, 1999
Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk IN THE COURT OF CRIMINA L APPEALS OF T ENNESSEE AT JACKSON MARCH SESSION , 1998 STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) C.C.A. NO. 02C01-9709- CC-00341 ) Appellee, ) ) ) HENRY COUNTY VS. ) ) HON. JULI AN P. GUINN JAMES ROBERT FIELDS, ) JUDGE ) Appe llant. ) (Direct Appeal -

Class B Misdemeanor ) Assault)

CONCURRING OPINION I agree that the convic

tion should be affirmed. Assault i s not a lesser included or lesser gr

ade offense of statutory rape. I disa gree, however, w

ith footnote 3 which suggests that a special request by the defendant for an instruction on a lesser offense would serv e to amend the indictment. See State v. Leland Ray Reeves , No. 01C01-9711-CR-00515 ( Tenn. Crim. App., at Nashvi lle, Mar. 23, 1999).

_________________________________ Gary R. Wade, Presiding Judge
§ 2003.2 Testimony and submission of written briefs. ( a ) Participation by an interested party in a public hearing announced under § 2003.1 shall require the submission of a written brief before the close of the period announced, in the public notice for its submission. Such brief may be, but need not be, supplemented by the presentation of oral testimony in accordance with § 2003.4.
( b ) A written brief by an interested party concerning any aspect of the trade agreements program or any related matter not subject to paragraph (a) of this section, and submitted pursuant to a public notice shall be submitted before the close of the period announced in the public notice for its submission.
( c ) A written brief shall state clearly the position taken and shall describe with particularity the evidence supporting such position. It shall be submitted in not less than twenty (20) copies which shall be legibly typed, printed, or duplicated.
( d ) In order to assure each party an opportunity to contest the information provided by other interested parties, the Committee will entertain rebuttal briefs filed by any party within a time limit specified by the Committee. Rebuttal briefs shall conform, in form and number, to the provisions of paragraph (c) of this section. Rebuttal briefs should be strictly limited to demonstrating errors of fact or analysis not pointed out in the briefs or hearings and should be as concise as possible.
( e ) A written brief by an interested party concerning any aspect of the Trade Agreements Program or any related matter not subject to paragraph (a) or (b) of this section may be submitted at any time.
( f ) The requirements in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section may be waived by the Special Representative, the Deputy Special Representative, or the Chairman of the Committee for reasons of equity and the public interest.
[40 FR 18421, Apr. 28, 1975, as amended at 40 FR 39498, Aug. 28, 1975]
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

616 

KA 08-00858 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ERIC J. MCGINNIS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (KIMBERLY F. DUGUAY OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MICHAEL C. GREEN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (GEOFFREY KAEUPER OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Richard A.

Keenan, J.), rendered March 13, 2008. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon

in the second degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him

upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the

second degree (Penal Law § 265.03 [3]). Defendant contends that

County Court erred in refusing to suppress, inter alia, the weapon

seized by the police from his vehicle. “We note at the outset that,

although the court issued a bench decision with respect to [those

parts of] defendant’s omnibus motion [seeking to suppress the weapon

found in his vehicle and his statements to the police,] the exception

set forth in CPL 710.70 (2) allowing appellate review with respect to

orders that finally den[y] a motion to suppress evidence is not

applicable because defendant pleaded guilty before the court issued

such an order” (People v Ellis, 73 AD3d 1433, 1433-1434, lv denied 15

NY3d 851 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see People v Leary, 70

AD3d 1394, lv denied 14 NY3d 889). In any event, we conclude that

defendant’s contention is without merit. The record of the

suppression hearing establishes that the police officer who pulled

over defendant’s vehicle for a traffic infraction had a founded

suspicion that criminal activity was afoot, and thus he was justified

in asking for defendant’s consent to search the vehicle (see People v

Lowe, 79 AD3d 1676; see also People v Simmons, 79 AD3d 431; People v

Ward, 22 AD3d 368, lv denied 6 NY3d 782). At the time the police

officer asked defendant for his consent, he was aware of defendant’s

criminal background and had observed defendant leaving in the vehicle

from a known drug location at a high rate of speed. Further,
-2- 616 

KA 08-00858 

defendant lied about the location from where he was driving. Contrary

to defendant’s further contention, the record also establishes that he

voluntarily consented to the search of the vehicle (see People v

Caldwell, 221 AD2d 972, lv denied 87 NY2d 920; see generally People v

Gonzalez, 39 NY2d 122, 128).

Entered: April 29, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
### §1320c–11. Exemptions for religious nonmedical health care institutions

The provisions of this part shall not apply with respect to a religious nonmedical health care institution (as defined in section 1395x(ss)(1) of this title).

(Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XI, §1162, as added Pub. L. 97–248, title I, §143, Sept. 3, 1982, 96 Stat. 393; amended Pub. L. 105–33, title IV, §4454(c)(2), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 431.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1320c–11, act Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XI, §1162, as added Oct. 30, 1972, Pub. L. 92–603, title II, §249F(b), 86 Stat. 1440; amended Dec. 5, 1980, Pub. L. 96–499, title IX, §§922(a), 927(b), 94 Stat. 2628, 2630; Aug. 13, 1981, 97–35, title XXI, §2113(h), 95 Stat. 795, related to Statewide Professional Standards Review Councils, prior to the general revision of this part by Pub. L. 97–248.

#### Amendments

1997—Pub. L. 105–33 substituted "Exemptions for religious nonmedical health care institutions" for "Exemptions of Christian Science sanatoriums" in section catchline and substituted "religious nonmedical health care institution (as defined in section 1395x(ss)(1) of this title)" for "Christian Science sanatorium operated, or listed and certified, by the First Church of Christ, Scientist, Boston, Massachusetts" in text.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1997 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 105–33 effective Aug. 5, 1997, and applicable to items and services furnished on or after such date, with provision that Secretary of Health and Human Services issue regulations to carry out such amendment by not later than July 1, 1998, see section 4454(d) of Pub. L. 105–33, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1395i–5 of this title.
§ 1251.2 Wood. ( a ) Unfinished and untreated wood does not exceed the limits for the heavy elements established in the toy standard with a high degree of assurance as that term is defined in 16 CFR part 1107, provided that the material has been neither treated nor adulterated with materials that could result in the addition of any of the heavy elements listed in the toy standard at levels above their respective solubility limits.
( b ) For purposes of this section, unfinished and untreated wood means wood harvested from the trunks of trees with no added surface coatings (such as, varnish, paint, shellac, or polyurethane) and no materials added to the wood substrate (such as, stains, dyes, preservatives, antifungals, or insecticides). Unfinished and untreated wood does not include manufactured or engineered woods (such as pressed wood, plywood, particle board, or fiberboard).
§ 23.20 Misuse of the word “pearl.” ( a ) It is unfair or deceptive to use the unqualified word “pearl” or any other word or phrase of like meaning to describe, identify, or refer to any object or product that is not in fact a pearl, as defined in § 23.19(a).
( b ) It is unfair or deceptive to use the word “pearl” to describe, identify, or refer to a cultured pearl unless it is immediately preceded, with equal conspicuousness, by the word “cultured” or “cultivated,” or by some other word or phrase of like meaning, so as to indicate definitely and clearly that the product is not a pearl.
( c ) It is unfair or deceptive to use the word “pearl” to describe, identify, or refer to an imitation pearl unless it is immediately preceded, with equal conspicuousness, by the word “artificial,” “imitation,” or “simulated,” or by some other word or phrase of like meaning, so as to indicate definitely and clearly that the product is not a pearl.
( d ) It is unfair or deceptive to use the terms “faux pearl,” “fashion pearl,” “Mother of Pearl,” or any other such term to describe or qualify an imitation pearl product unless it is immediately preceded, with equal conspicuousness, by the word “artificial,” “imitation,” or “simulated,” or by some other word or phrase of like meaning, so as to indicate definitely and clearly that the product is not a pearl.
#### Mary Pesce, as Administratrix of the Estate of Frank Pesce, Deceased, Appellant, v. Grace Line, Inc., Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
§ 300.1 Terms defined. ( a ) The term *Act* means the Wool Products Labeling Act of 1939, 15 U.S.C. 68 *et seq.,* as amended by Public Law 96-242, 94 Stat. 344, and Public Law 109-428, 120 Stat. 2913.
( b ) The terms *rule, rules, regulations* and *rules and regulations* mean the rules and regulations prescribed by the Commission pursuant to the Act.
( c ) The term *ornamentation* means any fibers or yarns imparting a visibly discernible pattern or design to a yarn or fabric.
( d ) The term *fiber trademark* means a word or words used by a person to identify a particular fiber produced or sold by him and to distinguish it from fibers of the same generic class produced or sold by others. Such term shall not include any trademark, product mark, house mark, trade name or other name which does not identify a particular fiber.
( e ) The terms *required information* or *information required* mean such information as is required to be disclosed on the required stamp, tag, label or other means of identification under the Act and regulations.
( f ) The definitions of terms contained in section 2 of the Act shall be applicable also to such terms when used in rules promulgated under the Act.
( g ) The term *United States* means the several States, the District of Columbia, and the territories and possessions of the United States.
( h ) The terms *mail order catalog* and *mail order promotional material* mean any materials, used in the direct sale or direct offering for sale of wool products, that are disseminated to ultimate consumers in print or by electronic means, other than by broadcast, and that solicit ultimate consumers to purchase such wool products by mail, telephone, electronic mail, or some other method without examining the actual product purchased.
( i ) The terms *label, labels, labeled,* and *labeling* mean the stamp, tag, label, or other means of identification, or authorized substitute therefore, required to be on or affixed to wool products by the Act or Regulations and on which the information required is to appear.
( j ) The terms *invoice* and *invoice or other document* have the meaning set forth in § 303.1(h) of this chapter.
( k ) The term *trimmings* has the meaning set forth in § 303.12 of this chapter.
[29 FR 6623, May 21, 1964, as amended at 45 FR 44261, July 1, 1980; 50 FR 15105, Apr. 17, 1985; 63 FR 7516, Feb. 13, 1998; 79 FR 32163, June 4, 2014]
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 228 / Monday, November 29, 2004 / Presidential Documents 69503

Proclamation 7849 of November 23, 2004

Thanksgiving Day, 2004

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation

All across America, we gather this week with the people we love to give 

thanks to God for the blessings in our lives. We are grateful for our freedom, 

grateful for our families and friends, and grateful for the many gifts of 

America. On Thanksgiving Day, we acknowledge that all of these things, 

and life itself, come from the Almighty God. 

Almost four centuries ago, the Pilgrims celebrated a harvest feast to thank 

God after suffering through a brutal winter. President George Washington 

proclaimed the first National Day of Thanksgiving in 1789, and President 

Lincoln revived the tradition during the Civil War, asking Americans to 

give thanks with ‘‘one heart and one voice.’’ Since then, in times of war 

and in times of peace, Americans have gathered with family and friends 

and given thanks to God for our blessings. 

Thanksgiving is also a time to share our blessings with those who are 

less fortunate. Americans this week will gather food and clothing for neighbors in need. Many young people will give part of their holiday to volunteer 

at homeless shelters and food pantries. On Thanksgiving, we remember 

that the true strength of America lies in the hearts and souls of the American 

people. By seeking out those who are hurting and by lending a hand, 

Americans touch the lives of their fellow citizens and help make our Nation 

and the world a better place. 

This Thanksgiving, we express our gratitude to our dedicated firefighters 

and police officers who help keep our homeland safe. We are grateful 

to the homeland security and intelligence personnel who spend long hours 

on faithful watch. And we give thanks for the Americans in our Armed 

Forces who are serving around the world to secure our country and advance 

the cause of freedom. These brave men and women make our entire Nation 

proud, and we thank them and their families for their sacrifice. 

On this Thanksgiving Day, we thank God for His blessings and ask Him 

to continue to guide and watch over our Nation. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim Thursday, November 

25, 2004, as a National Day of Thanksgiving. I encourage all Americans 

to gather together in their homes and places of worship to reinforce the 

ties of family and community and to express gratitude for the many blessings 

we enjoy.

69504 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 228 / Monday, November 29, 2004 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-third 

day of November, in the year of our Lord two thousand four, and of the 

Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and twentyBilling code 3195

Filed 11

[FR Doc. 04

–26–

–

04; 8:45 am] 

26443

–01–P 

ninth.

W
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

JUSTIN CORLISS,

Petitioner

v.

LEE A. CICCARELLI, PC D/B/A

CICCARELLI LAW OFFICES,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 157 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 21st day of September, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
**
**Exhibit 12.1**

**Certification by the Principal Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Calvin Choi, certify that: 

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of AMTD InternationalInc.; 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.    The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

(a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)    [reserved] 

(c)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d)    Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.    The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in thecompany’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: April 30, 2020 

 
By: 
  /s/ Calvin Choi
   Name: Calvin Choi   Title: Chief Executive Officer
 
**
#### Mary Kiwin, Respondent, v. Abraham Gabriel Maloof, also Known as Abraham Gabriel, Appellant.

Judgment and orders affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present—Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Smith, JJ.
Exhibit 99.1.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of CYOP Systems International Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mitch White, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Mitch White



Mitch White
Chief Executive Officer 
May 5, 2003



This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
### §12595. National service educational awards

#### (a) Eligibility generally

A participant in a national service program carried out using assistance provided to an applicant under section 12571 of this title shall be eligible for the national service educational award described in division D if the participant—

(1) serves in an approved national service position; and

(2) satisfies the eligibility requirements specified in section 12602 of this title with respect to service in that approved national service position.

#### (b) Special rule for VISTA volunteers

A VISTA volunteer who serves in an approved national service position shall be ineligible for a national service educational award if the VISTA volunteer accepts the stipend authorized under section 4955(a)(1) of this title.

(Pub. L. 101–610, title I, §141, as added Pub. L. 103–82, title I, §101(b), Sept. 21, 1993, 107 Stat. 814.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 141 of Pub. L. 101–610 was classified to section 12571 of this title prior to the general amendment of subtitle D of title I of Pub. L. 101–610 [former part D of this subchapter] by Pub. L. 103–82, §102(a).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1993, see section 123 of Pub. L. 103–82, set out as an Effective Date of 1993 Amendment note under section 1701 of Title 16, Conservation.