alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Guardiola, Maria 

Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 8:35 AM 

To: FCSS_Document_Processing Resource 

Cc: Bartlett, Matthew 

Subject: Phone call summary 

Attachments: 665S.docx 

Please docket the attached email which contains the meeting summary for a call with INIS. The 

email should be placed in an ADAMS in Docket 40-9086. The 665S is attached. Thanks. 

Attendees: 

Maria C. Guardiola-NRC 

Matthew Bartlett-NRC 

Richard Heimbach-NRC contractor 

Kristia Dearing-NRC Contractor 

Tim Harvey-NRC Contractor 

Asimios Malliakos-NRC 

John Miller-INIS 

Purpose: Discuss groundwater well that will be drilled by Lea County. 

Currently the land where INIS plans to build the International Isotopes Fluorine Products facility will be 

constructed is owned by Lea County and has one well. In order for the land to be transferred to INIS 

another well needs to be dug by Lea County. INIS had a concern that this would be considered as 

preconstruction. 

John indicated that the Xcel production (Maddox) well located on the site has permitted water rights of 

100 to 150 acre-feet per year. Although Xcel has no plans to use groundwater from the well, they plan to 

maintain their water rights since under NM Water Right Statutes they can tranfer the groundwater rights to 

other (groundwater) non-Critical Managment Areas. Therefore, the existing Xcel well is not available for 

site use, and Lea County will install a new well in accordance with a NM Water Rights Purpose in Place 

Permit for up to 50 ac-ft/yr. A Purpose in Place Permit simply means that the NM Office of State Engineer 

would issue the site a certificate which quantifies the right and describes the point(s) of diversion, place of 

use, and purpose of use. 

Asimios emphsized the importance of getting a response to RAI 11 with information that includes the new 

well so that impacts to the groundwater aquifer and nearby users can be evaluated. No additional 

information is requested beyond what was originally requested in RAI 11. 

Asimios asked whether there might be any other unexpected requirements related to the land transfer 

that could emerge later. John replied that he didn’t think there would be, since Lea County has been 

working on the land transfer for about a year now. 

 

John indicated that he felt he could easily get the proposed site production well details from Lea County, 

and that he expects an RAI draft response to be delivered for his review late this week. Since the prairie 

chicken survey would not be completed until next week, the survey be will submitted under separate 

cover - most likely during or after the week of April 11. 

Maria C. Guardiola 

US Nuclear Regulatory Commission 
Office of Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards 

AFCB Branch 

Phone: (301) 492-3566
#### § 1702.14 Marketing history.

Each petition for an exemption under this part shall include a statement of the marketing history of the substance for which an exemption is requested. The marketing history dates from the year in which each form of the product was introduced onto the market. The marketing history shall include the total number of units of each form or strength and package size of the product distributed since the product was introduced onto the market. In the case of prescription drugs, the average prescription size for the product should also be indicated, if known.
#### § 701.4 Owner registration cards.

When a warrantor employs any card such as an owner's registration card, a warranty registration card, or the like, and the return of such card is a condition precedent to warranty coverage and performance, the warrantor shall disclose this fact in the warranty. If the return of such card reasonably appears to be a condition precedent to warranty coverage and performance, but is not such a condition, that fact shall be disclosed in the warranty.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ARC Corporate Realty Trust, Inc.® (ACRT) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Bruce Nelson, Chief Financial Officer of ACRT, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of ACRT.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Bruce Nelson       
|Bruce Nelson           
|Chief Financial Officer
|July 24, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         271,112
<SECURITIES>                                    14,818
<RECEIVABLES>                                  111,055
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,593
<INVENTORY>                                    335,216
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               748,438
<PP&E>                                         782,752
<DEPRECIATION>                                 209,987
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,375,932
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          326,646
<BONDS>                                        415,296
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     590,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,375,932
<SALES>                                      3,289,562
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,306,721
<CGS>                                        2,791,363
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,157,757
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                48,657
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,281
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 68,026
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,697
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             56,329
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    56,329
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 922
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

§ 922.167 Permits for access to the Tortugas Ecological Reserve. ( a ) A person may enter the Tortugas North area of the Tortugas Ecological Reserve other than for passage without interruption through the reserve, for law enforcement purposes, or for purposes of monitoring pursuant to paragraph (d)(2) of § 922.164 , if authorized by a valid access permit issued pursuant to § 922.167.
( b ) ( 1 ) Access permits must be requested at least 72 hours but no longer than one month before the date the permit is desired to be effective. Access permits do not require written applications or the payment of any fee. Permits may be requested via telephone or radio by contacting FKNMS at any of the following numbers: Key West office: telephone: (305) 292-0311 Marathon office: telephone: (305) 743-2437
( 2 ) The following information must be provided, as applicable: ( i ) Vessel name.
( ii ) Name, address, and telephone number of owner and operator.
( iii ) Name, address, and telephone number of applicant.
( iv ) USCG documentation, state license, or registration number.
( v ) Home port.
( vi ) Length of vessel and propulsion type (*i.e.,* motor or sail).
( vii ) Number of divers.
( viii ) Requested effective date and duration of permit (2 weeks, maximum).
( c ) The Sanctuary Superintendent will issue a permit to the owner or to the owner's representative for the vessel when all applicable information has been provided. The Sanctuary Superintendent will provide a permit number to the applicant and confirm the effective date and duration period of the permit. Written confirmation of permit issuance will be provided upon request.
[66 FR 4370, Jan. 17, 2001]
Exhibit 32.1

                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                           by Chief Executive Officer

          In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of VSB Bancorp,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on or about the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Merton Corn,  President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: August 14, 2007

                                                /s/ Merton Corn
                                                ------------------------------
                                                Merton Corn, President and CEO


A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       29
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3632 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3632

To require the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 
prescribe regulations requiring air carriers to provide passengers with 
       certain amenities and facilities, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 12, 2011

 Mr. Kissell introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 
prescribe regulations requiring air carriers to provide passengers with 
       certain amenities and facilities, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Basic Airline Services to Improve 
Customer Satisfaction Act''.

SEC. 2. REGULATIONS REQUIRING AIR CARRIERS TO PROVIDE CERTAIN AMENITIES 
              AND FACILITIES TO PASSENGERS.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall 
prescribe regulations--
            (1) to require an air carrier operating under part 121 of 
        title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, to permit each passenger 
        who has purchased a ticket for air transportation on the air 
        carrier to, without paying a charge in addition to the price of 
        the ticket--
                    (A) check one bag that is not considered overweight 
                or oversized pursuant to the policy of the air carrier 
                in effect on the day before the date of the enactment 
                of this Act;
                    (B) carry on to the aircraft one personal item and 
                one carry-on bag that are not considered overweight or 
                oversized pursuant to that policy; and
                    (C) once the passenger boards the aircraft, have 
                access to--
                            (i) a seat;
                            (ii) potable water; and
                            (iii) bathroom facilities; and
            (2) to impose a civil penalty on an air carrier that fails 
        to comply with the regulations prescribed under paragraph (1).
                                 <all>
```
#### §§ 680.4-680.20 [Reserved]
Ex-10.2



 





Exhibit 10.2




AMENDMENT TO

THE LUMINEX CORPORATION

2001 BROAD-BASED STOCK OPTION PLAN




     WHEREAS, Luminex Corporation (the “Company”) maintains the Luminex Corporation 2001
Broad-Based Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”); and



     WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 8 of the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company (the
“Board”) may amend the Plan; and



     WHEREAS, the Board desires to amend the Plan to revise the provisions in Section 5.2(c) of the
Plan regarding adjustments to the shares of the Company’s common stock, or awards granted under the
Plan in connection with a recapitalization (or other similar event).



     NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of the date hereof, the Board hereby amends and restates Section
5.2(c) of the Plan in its entirety to read as follows:




     (c) In the event of changes in the outstanding Common Stock by reason of a Corporate
Transaction (as hereinafter defined), recapitalizations, reorganizations, mergers,
consolidations, combinations, separations (including a spin-off or other distribution of
stock or property), exchanges, or other relevant changes in capitalization occurring after
the date of grant of any Option and not otherwise provided for by this Section 5.2, any
outstanding Options and any Option Agreements evidencing such Options shall be equitably and
proportionately adjusted by the Board as to the number, price and kind of shares or other
consideration subject to, and other terms of, such Options to reflect such changes in the
outstanding Common Stock.



     FURTHER RESOLVED, that the officers of the Company be, and each of them hereby is, authorized,
empowered and directed in the name and on behalf of the Company to take or cause to be taken all
such further actions and to execute and deliver or cause to be executed and delivered all such
further agreements, instruments and documents in the name and on behalf of the Company and to incur
and pay all such fees and expenses as in their judgment shall be necessary or advisable in order to
consummate the transactions contemplated by, and carry out fully the intent and purpose of, the
preceding resolutions and each of them.



2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the Form 10-Q) of Surrey
Bancorp (the Company), we, Edward C. Ashby, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Mark H. Towe, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:

(a) the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b) the information contained in the Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.



|    |  |                                                |  |  |  |                   
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Edward C. Ashby, III                       |  |  |  | Date: May 13, 2010
|    |  | Edward C. Ashby, III.                          |  |  |  |                   
|    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer          |  |  |  |                   
|    |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                  |  |  |  |                   
|    |  |                                                | 
|By: |  | /s/ Mark H. Towe                               |  |  |  | Date: May 13, 2010
|    |  | Mark H. Towe                                   |  |  |  |                   
|    |  | Sr. Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer |  |  |  |                   
|    |  | (Principal Financial Officer)                  |  |  |  |
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 8, 2011

p0228 

# Order

March 8, 2011

141976

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141976 COA: 291527 Wayne CC: 08-016290-FC SHELTON CARTER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 21, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. John E. Pardee, Respondent.

The respondent was indicted for violation of subdivision 5 of section 70 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law as a felony, the indictment alleging that on March 4, 1950, he operated a motor vehicle in Westchester County while he was “ in an intoxicated condition ” and that such operation was after he had been convicted by a plea of guilty in Connecticut of the crime of operating a motor vehicle “while under the influence of intoxicating liquor”. On respondent’s motion the indictment was dismissed, on the ground that the felony indictment of respondent under subdivision 5 of section 70 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law could not be based upon his previous conviction in the State of Connecticut of operating a motor vehicle "while under the influence of intoxicating liquor”. The People appeal from the order of the County Court, Westchester County, dismissing the indictment. Order affirmed. No *736opinion. Nolan, P. J., Carswell and MaeCrate, JJ., concur; Adel and Schmidt, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the order and to deny the motion, with the following memorandum: Under subdivision 5 of section 70 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law, which is similar in design to section 408 and subdivision 5 of section 1897 of the Penal Law, it is not essential that the prior conviction be had within the State of New York. Whether the crime of which respondent pleaded guilty in Connecticut is the same or is described in subdivision 5 of section 70 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law is to be determined at the trial. (See *State*v. *Andrews,*108 Conn. 209.) In any event the indictment charges but one crime, the grade of which may be proved. *(People*v. *Reilly,*49 App. Div. 218, 222-223.) [202 Misc. 238.]
#### Louis Rubenstein, Respondent, v. Philip Morris Dress Manufacturing Co., Inc., Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
#### § 1401.1 Scope.

This part 1401 establishes requirements under section 27(e) of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2076(e)) for marketers and importers of self-pressurized consumer products that contain chlorofluorocarbons as propellants to provide notification of certain performance and technical data to prospective purchasers of such products at the time of original purchase and to the first purchaser of such products for purposes other than resale. The notification shall consist of a label on the product stating that it contains a chlorofluorocarbon that may harm the public health and environment by reducing the ozone in the upper atmosphere. Also, manufacturers and importers must provide the commission with reports identifying which of the self-pressurized consumer products sold by them contain chlorofluorocarbon propellants.
NRC SEEKS PUBLIC COMMENT ON FY 2013 PROPOSED FEE RULE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is seeking public comments on proposed changes to 

its regulations for the licensing, inspection and annual fees it charges applicants and licensees for 

fiscal year (FY) 2013. The proposed fee rule, published today in the Federal Register, includes 

fees required by law to recover approximately 90 percent of the agency’s budget authority. 

The NRC is operating under a Continuing Resolution set to expire on March 27. Based 

on the FY 2013 budget submitted to the Congress, the NRC’s required fee recovery amount is 

approximately $924.8 million, an increase of 1.7 percent from FY 2012. Approximately 40 

percent of the fees (10 CFR Part 170) will be billed for specific services to recover the cost of 

special benefits to identifiable applicants and licensees and the remaining 60 percent will be 

billed as annual fees (10 CFR Part 171). By law, the NRC is required to collect all fees by Sept. 

30, 2013.

The proposed rule includes several changes. First, the NRC is proposing to change the 

current hourly rate of $274 to $277 for FY 2013, an increase of 1.1 percent. This increase in 

hourly rate is a result of an increased agency direct budgetary resource for FY 2013. Second, the 

NRC would revise the flat license application fees in 10 CFR Parts 170.21 and 170.31 to reflect 

the new hourly rate. Finally, the FY 2013 proposed annual fees would increase for spent fuel 

storage facilities, research and test reactors, fuel facilities, most material users, and uranium 

recovery facilities, while annual fees would decrease for operating reactors and U.S. Department 

of Energy transportation activities.

The NRC is continuing its efforts to keep its fees as low as possible by ensuring its 

programs are conducted efficiently and effectively, and requesting from Congress only the 

resources necessary to protect people and the environment. 

Comments on the proposed rule are due by April 8 and may be submitted through the 

federal government’s rulemaking website at http://www.regulations.gov using Docket ID

NRC-2012-0211 or by e-mail to Rulemaking.Comments@nrc.gov. They may also be mailed to 

Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., 20555-0001, ATTN: 

Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff.

###

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 13-012 March 7, 2013
News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.
### SUBCHAPTER VI—FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE