alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 10.82 Proposed findings and conclusions; briefs. In any proceeding involving a hearing or an opportunity for hearing, the parties may file written proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. Briefs may be filed in support of proposed findings and conclusions either as part of the same document or in a separate document. Any proposed finding or conclusion not briefed may be regarded as waived. ( a ) *Proposed findings and briefs; time for filing.* Where the parties file proposed findings and briefs, the following schedule shall apply, unless otherwise determined by the Administrative Law Judge: ( 1 ) *Initial submission.* Proposed findings, conclusions and an initial brief shall be served and filed by the Division of Enforcement and intervenors on the side of the Division of Enforcement within 45 days of the close of the hearing;
( 2 ) *Answering submission.* Proposed findings, conclusions, and an answering brief shall be served and filed by the respondents and intervenors on the side of the respondents within 30 days after service of the initial findings, conclusions and briefs upon the respondents;
( 3 ) *Reply.* A reply brief may be filed by the Division of Enforcement and intervenors on the side of the Division of Enforcement within 15 days after filing of the answering submission;
( 4 ) *Submissions by limited participants.* Submissions by a person admitted as a limited participant pursuant to § 10.34 of these rules, are permitted under such terms as determined by the Administrative Law Judge.
( b ) *Alternative procedures for submissions.* In his discretion the Administrative Law Judge may lengthen or shorten the periods for the filing of submissions, may direct simultaneous filings, may direct that respondents make the first filing, or may otherwise modify the procedures set forth in paragraph (a) of this section for purposes of a particular proceeding.
( c ) *Briefs.* ( 1 ) The initial brief should include: ( i ) A short, clear and concise statement of the case;
( ii ) Specification of the questions to be resolved; and
( iii ) The argument, presenting clearly the points of fact and law relied upon in support of the position taken on each question.
( 2 ) The answering brief shall generally follow the same style as prescribed for the initial brief but may omit a statement of the case if the party does not dispute the statement of the case contained in the initial brief;
( 3 ) Reply briefs should be limited to rebuttal of matters in the prior briefs.
( d ) *Content and form of proposed findings and conclusions.* ( 1 ) The findings of fact shall be confined to the material issues of fact presented on the record, with exact citations to the transcripts of record and exhibits in support of each proposed finding.
( 2 ) The proposed findings and conclusions of the party filing initially shall be set forth in consecutively numbered paragraphs and all counter-statement of proposed findings and conclusions shall, in addition to any other matter, indicate which paragraphs of initial proposals are not disputed.
No: III-15-024 December 22, 2015

CONTACT: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663

NRC Issues Confirmatory Order to Monticello Nuclear Power Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a Confirmatory Order to the Monticello nuclear 

power plant. The company has agreed to a series of actions related to an event where specialized 

examinations were not performed properly on six spent fuel canisters. Monticello is operated by 

Northern States Power Co.-Minnesota, and is located in Monticello, Minn., approximately 30 miles 

northwest of Minneapolis.

The confirmatory order is a result of the NRC’s Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) process, 

which was requested by the company to address three apparent violations related to the improper testing 

of the canisters in 2013. The NRC senior resident inspector identified the issue when he observed two 

contractors fail to properly perform liquid penetrant examinations on the welds of the canisters. The 

NRC conducted a follow-up investigation into the event, which determined that the testing examinations 

were falsely recorded and the plant failed to have effective quality controls in place to monitor the 

contractor work. The investigation also found the deliberate actions of the contractors caused the plant to 

be in violation of NRC requirements regarding the welds.

The NRC has found no immediate safety concerns with the canisters. However, as a result of the 

ADR meeting the company has agreed to take a number of actions to regain compliance with agency 

regulations. Some of the commitments for the company include: ensuring the canisters are brought into 

compliance; submitting a plan to return to compliance and provide updates on progress; ensuring

procedures require direct oversight of the testing performed by contractors; and making a presentation 

on the facts and lessons learned at an industry forum so that others may receive the information.

The company has agreed to address these issues according to the timelines established in the 

Confirmatory Order and to send the NRC a letter documenting completion of the actions when they are 

done.

The ADR process involves mediation facilitated by a neutral third party with no decision-making 

authority who assists the NRC and a licensee in reaching an agreement when there are differences 

regarding an enforcement action.

The NRC’s Confirmatory Order will be made publically available through the Agency Documents 

Access and Management System (ADAMS) at the NRC website.
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63OF****TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE**     In connection with the Annual Report of Stratos International,Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-K for theperiod ended April 30, 2006, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Barry Hollingsworth, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:          (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and           (2) the information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Barry Hollingsworth       Barry Hollingsworth     Chief Financial OfficerJuly 28, 2006
# Grow It, Try It, Like It! Fun with Fruits and Vegetables at Family Child Care

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Team Nutrition 

Grow It, Try It, Like It! Fun with Fruits and Vegetables at Family Child Care (All Files)

Grow It, Try It, Like It! Nutrition Education Kit Featuring MyPlate

Team Nutrition Garden Resources

*Grow It, Try It, Like It! Fun with Fruits and Vegetables at Family Child Care* is designed to help Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) operators provide garden-based nutrition education for children ages 3 through 5 years old in family child care settings.

Through the activities in *Grow It, Try It, Like It!*, children touch, smell, feel, and taste new fruits and vegetables. Children also learn how fruits and vegetables grow. Planting activities help children connect the delicious food choices at the table with the farm, orchard, or garden.

## Availability

**Ordering:** Print copies are available in English. Child nutrition program operators may request printed copies of this resource, while supplies last.

All are welcome to download these materials and make copies. To download the files, please right-click on the link and select "save link as."

All files

Basics

Strawberry Patch

Spinach Lane

Cantaloupe Corner

Crookneck Squash Row

Peach Tree Orchard

Sweet Potato Hill

Appendixes

Grow It, Try It, Like It! Cards

MyPlate Poster

Tasty Acres Farm Map

Page updated: June 24, 2024
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A0111. TYOUNE YOUNG v. THE STATE.

Tyoune Young pled guilty to manslaughter and aggravated assault in 2010.

Then, in June 2016, Young filed a pro se “Motion to Vacate Void Judgment.” The

trial court denied the motion and Young filed both this appeal and an application for

discretionary review, Case No. A17D0070.

We denied Young’s application for discretionary review on September 27,

2016. Because that denial was an adjudication on the merits, the doctrine of res

judicata bars this direct appeal. See Northwest Social & Civic Club, Inc. v. Franklin,

276 Ga. 859, 860 (583 SE2d 858) (2003); Hook v. Bergen, 286 Ga. App. 258, 260-

261 (1) (649 SE2d 313) (2007). This appeal is therefore DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

March 22, 2017

03/22/2017
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 6- 10 46

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Fi ne ol a In gr am ; J us ti n S imm on s; Bri an Bo yki n ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff s - Ap pe ll an ts

v. Co le Co un ty; She rif

f Greg W hi te ; J oh n Whee le r ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll lDefe nd

an ts - App el le es

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Weste rn Dis tri ctof M is so ur i - J effe rs on Cit y

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Octo be r 17 , 20 17 Fi le d: Ju ly 30, 2 01 8 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re SM ITH, Chi ef J ud ge , W OLLMAN, LOKEN, MURPHY, COLLOTON , GRUENDER, BENTON , SHEPHERD, and KELLY , Cir cu it Ju dg es , En Ban c. 1

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Ju dg e Mu rp hy di ed on May 16 , 20 18 , an d th us di d no t pa rti ci pa te in th e fin al 1 vo te
.The di st ric t co ur t’s jud gm en t di sm is si ng cl ai m s ag ai n st de fen da nt s W he el er

an d W hi te is affi rm ed , wi th fo ur jud ge s co nc lu di ng th a t t h e co m pl ai nt fai ls to st at e a cl ai m an d fo ur jud ge s co nc lu di ng th at th e de fen da n ts are en ti tl ed to qu al ifi ed imm un it y . The di st ric t co ur t’s jud gm en t di sm is si ng cl ai m s ag ai ns t Co le Co un ty is affi rm edby an eq ua ll y

di vi de d c ou rt.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of ARC Corporate Realty Trust, Inc.® (ACRT) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Bruce Nelson, Chief Financial Officer of ACRT, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of ACRT.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Bruce Nelson       
|Bruce Nelson           
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 11, 2004
No: 15-030 April 30, 2015

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200

NRC Concludes Hearing On Fermi New Reactor,

Combined License To Be Issued

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has concluded its mandatory hearing on DTE Electric 

Company’s (DTE) application for a Combined License (COL) at the Fermi site in Michigan. The 

Commission found the staff’s review adequate to make the necessary regulatory safety and 

environmental findings, clearing the way for the NRC’s Office of New Reactors to issue the license.

The NRC staff will work to issue the COL promptly. The license will authorize DTE to build 

and operate an Economic Simplified Boiling -Water Reactor (ESBWR) at the Fermi site, adjacent to 

the company’s existing reactor near Newport, Mich. The Commission imposed several conditions on 

the license, including:

 specific actions associated with the agency’s post-Fukushima requirements for 

Mitigation Strategies and Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation;

 requiring monitoring and analysis of the reactor’s steam dryer during initial plant 

startup, in line with current procedures for existing boiling-water reactors approved to 

operate at increased power levels; and

 setting a pre-startup schedule for post-Fukushima aspects of the new reactor’s 

emergency preparedness plans and procedures.

DTE submitted its COL application on Sept. 18, 2008. The NRC’s Advisory Committee on 

Reactor Safeguards independently reviewed aspects of the application that concern safety, as well as 

the staff’s final safety evaluation report (FSER). The committee provided the results of its review to the 

Commission on Sept. 22, 2014. The NRC completed its environmental review and issued the final 

impact statement for the proposed Fermi reactor in January 2013. The NRC completed and issued the 

FSER on Nov. 18, 2014. 

The NRC completed the COL review after the agency certified the ESBWR design following a 

Commission vote in September 2014. The ESBWR is a 1,600-megawatt electric reactor that includes 

passive safety features to cool down the reactor after an accident without the need for electricity or 

human intervention.
#### § 1502.3 Confidential information.

Whenever any participant desires or is required to submit information in any proceeding under this part 1502, and the participant believes that such information consists of trade secret or other confidential business or financial information that should not be disclosed publicly, the participant may, instead of submitting such information, file a motion for a protective order containing a general description of the information desired to be withheld, together with a detailed argument supporting the claim that the information should be held in confidence.
#### Charles W. Fisk, as Administrator, etc., Plaintiff, v. The Central Bank of Rochester, N. Y., Defendant.

Plaintiff’s exceptions overruled, motion for new trial denied, with costs, and judgment directed for the defendant upon the verdict, with costs. All concurred.
#### § 461.1 Definitions.

As used in this part:

*Business* means a corporation, partnership, association, or any other entity that provides goods or services, including not-for-profit entities.

*Government* includes federal, state, local, and tribal governments as well as agencies and departments thereof.

*Materially* means likely to affect a person's choice of, or conduct regarding, goods or services.

*Officer* includes executives, officials, employees, and agents.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

# TIME AND DATE:

11:30 a.m., Monday, December 6, 2004.

# PLACE:

Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1.  Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve System employees.

2.  Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michelle A. Smith, Director, Office of Board Members; 202-452-2955.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                        You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at                         *http://www.federalreserve.gov*                         for an electronic announcement that not only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other information about the meeting.                    

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 26, 2004.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 04-26452 Filed 11-26-04; 10:55 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
#### § 702.2 Scope.

The regulations in this part establish requirements for sellers and warrantors for making the terms of any written warranty on a consumer product available to the consumer prior to sale.
### §13991. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 13991 was editorially reclassified as section 12371 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6168

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CORIEAL LAROME HOLMES, a/k/a Cory,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:17-cr-00210-FDW-DSC-1)

Submitted: June 24, 2021 Decided: June 29, 2021

Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Corieal Larome Holmes, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Corieal Larome Holmes appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for 

compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step Act 

of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. On appeal, we confine 

our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because 

Holmes’ informal brief does not challenge a dispositive basis for the district court’s 

disposition—specifically, that the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors counseled against his 

release—he has forfeited appellate review of that finding. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 

F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth 

Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we 

deny Holmes’ motions to appoint counsel and affirm the district court’s order. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 1631.33 Carpets and rugs with fire-retardant treatment. ( a ) For the purposes of this section the following definitions apply: ( 1 ) *Small carpet* and *small rug* means “small carpet” and “small rug” as defined in § 1631.1(c).
( 2 ) *Fire-retardant treatment* means “fire-retardant treatment” as defined in the Standard in subpart A of this part.
( b ) If a carpet or rug or small carpet or rug is manufactured, imported, or otherwise marketed or handled which has had a fire-retardant treatment or is made of fibers which have had a fire-retardant treatment, the letter “T” shall be set forth legibly and conspicuously, and shall appear at all times, on each label and/or invoice relating thereto pursuant to the requirements of the Textile Fiber Products Indentification Act, 15 U.S.C. section 70, *et seq.,* and the rules and regulations thereunder, whether or not such letter “T” appears elsewhere on said product. Samples, pieces, rolls, or squares used to promote or effect the sale of such carpet or rug are subject to the aforementioned requirements. As provided in the applicable portions of the aforesaid Act and the rules and regulations thereunder, where a carpet or rug or a small carpet or rug which has had a fire-retardant treatment or is made of fibers which have had a fire-retardant treatment, is sold to an ultimate consumer and was either custom made or commercially installed for such consumer, the labeling required by this section shall not apply with respect to the carpet or rug if an invoice or other paper relating thereto, containing the letter “T”, legibly and conspicuously written, is delivered to the consumer in due course of business.
( c ) No person subject to the Flammable Fabrics Act shall manufacture, import, distribute, or otherwise market or handle any carpet or rug or small carpet or rug, including samples, swatches, or specimens used to promote or effect the sale thereof, which is not in compliance with this section.
### §13386. Export of domestic energy resource technologies to developing countries

The Secretary, through the Trade Promotion Coordinating Council, shall develop policies and programs to encourage the export and promotion of domestic energy resource technologies, including renewable energy, energy efficiency, and clean coal technologies, to developing countries.

(Pub. L. 102–486, title XVI, §1607, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3003.)
Exhibit 32.2

                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                           by Chief Financial Officer

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of VSB Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Raffaele M. Branca, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 8, 2005

                                         /s/ RAFFAELE M. BRANCA
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Raffaele M. Branca
                                         Executive Vice President and CFO


A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.



                                       28