alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00086-CR

Sergio Delgado Dominguez, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 299TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-05-205935-A, HONORABLE KAREN SAGE, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R A N D M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s brief was due in this Court on June 16, 2014. On July 1, we notified

appellant’s counsel that appellant’s brief was overdue and that if we did not receive a satisfactory

response from counsel on or before July 11, 2014, a hearing before the district court pursuant to

Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b) would be ordered. To date, appellant’s brief has not been filed, nor have we

received a response from counsel. 

We therefore abate the cause and remand it to the district court to hold a hearing in

accordance with rule 38.8 of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). The

district court shall hold a hearing immediately to determine whether appellant still wishes to

prosecute his appeal, whether appellant is indigent, and whether counsel has abandoned the appeal.

See id. If appellant desires to appeal and is indigent, the district court should make appropriate

orders to ensure that appellant is adequately represented on appeal. See id. Following the hearing,
the district court should order the appropriate supplementary clerk’s and reporter’s records to be

prepared and forwarded to this Court no later than September 29, 2014. See id.

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Field

Abated and Remanded

Filed: August 28, 2014

Do Not Publish

2
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 228 (Monday, November 29, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 69350]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26264]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Florida Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Florida Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 8:30 
a.m. and adjourn at 1:30 p.m. on December 10, 2004, at the Inter-
Continental Hotel, 100 Chopin Plaza, Miami, FL 33131. The purpose of 
the meeting is to determine what Civil Rights issues will be reviewed 
as a project.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Ivy Davis, Chief of the Regional 
Programs Coordination Unit, (202) 376-7700 (TDD (202) 376-8116). 
Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the 
services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional 
Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the 
meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, November 13, 2004.
Aonghas St. Hillarie,
Acting Chief Managing Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-26264 Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3598 

To prohibit fees with respect to electronic benefit transfer debit cards used 

in connection with unemployment compensation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 7, 2011 

Ms. CLARKE of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To prohibit fees with respect to electronic benefit transfer 

debit cards used in connection with unemployment compensation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON CHARGING FEES IN CONNEC4 TION WITH EBT DEBIT CARDS IN CONNEC5 TION WITH UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSA6 TION. 

7 (a) APPROVAL OF STATE LAWS.—Paragraph (4) of 

8 section 3304(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

9 amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3598 IH

1 ‘‘For purposes of this paragraph, expenses of admin2 istration includes any fee in connection with the use 

3 of electronic benefit transfer debit cards for the pay4 ment of unemployment compensation.’’. 

5 (b) UNEMPLOYMENT FUND DEFINITION.—Sub6 section (f) of section 3306 of such Code is amended by 

7 adding at the end the following flush sentence: 

8 ‘‘For purposes of this subsection, expenses of administra9 tion includes any fee in connection with the use of elec10 tronic benefit transfer debit cards for the payment of un11 employment compensation.’’. 

12 (c) CERTIFICATION.—Section 303(a)(5) of the Social 

13 Security Act is amended by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end and 

14 inserting the following: ‘‘Provided further, That, for pur15 poses of this paragraph, expenses of administration in16 cludes any fee in connection with the use of electronic ben17 efit transfer debit cards for the payment of unemployment 

18 compensation; and’’. 

19 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—In the case of any State, the 

20 amendments made by this section shall apply with respect 

21 to compensation paid for weeks which begin after the end 

22 of the 1-month period beginning on the last day of the 

23 first session of the State legislature which begins after the 

24 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
§ 1025.32 Written interrogatories to parties. ( a ) *Availability; procedures for use.* Any party may serve upon any other party written interrogatories to be answered by the party served or, if the party served is a public or private corporation or a partnership or unincorporated association or governmental entity, by any officer or agent, who shall furnish such information as is available to the party. Interrogatories may, without leave of the Presiding Officer, be served upon any party after the filing of an answer.
( b ) *Procedures for response.* Each interrogatory shall be answered separately and fully in writing under oath, unless it is objected to, in which event the reasons for objection shall be stated in lieu of an answer. Each answer shall be submitted in double-spaced typewritten form and shall be immediately preceded by the interrogatory, in single-spaced typewritten form, to which the answer is responsive. The answers are to be signed by the person making them, and the objections signed by the person or representative making them. The party upon whom the interrogatories have been served shall serve a copy of the answers, and objections if any, within 30 days after service of the interrogatories. The Presiding Officer may allow a shorter or longer time for response. The party submitting the interrogatories may move for an order under § 1025.36 of these rules with respect to any objection to, or other failure to answer fully, an interrogatory.
( c ) *Scope of interrogatories.* Interrogatories may relate to any matters which can be inquired into under § 1025.31(c), and the answers may be used to any extent permitted under these rules. An interrogatory otherwise proper is not objectionable merely because an answer to the interrogatory would involve an opinion or contention which relates to fact or to the application of law to fact, but the Presiding Officer may order that such an interrogatory need not be answered until a later time.
( d ) *Option to produce business records.* Where the answer to an interrogatory may be derived or ascertained from the business records of the party upon whom the interrogatory has been served, or from an examination, audit, or inspection of such business records, or from a compilation, abstract, or summary of those records, and the burden of deriving the answer is substantially the same for the party serving the interrogatory as for the party served, it is a sufficient answer to the interrogatory to specify the records from which the answer may be derived or ascertained and to afford to the party serving the interrogatory reasonable opportunity to examine, audit, or inspect such records and to make copies, compilations, abstracts, or summaries.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

NOTICE TO FILE THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL CLERK’S RECORD

Appellate case name: Patrick Olajide Akinwamide v. Transportation Insurance 

Company, CNA Insurance Company, and Automatic Data 

Processing Inc.

Appellate case number: 01-15-00066-CV

Trial court case number: 1997-48526

Trial court: 80th District Court of Harris County

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(c), the district clerk is 

directed to file a third supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified copy of the 

findings of fact and conclusions of law, filed on November 12, 2015.

The third supplemental clerk’s record shall be filed with the Clerk of the First 

Court of Appeals in the above-referenced appellate cause number 01-15-00066-CV

within 10 days of the date of this notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c)(1), (3).

The cost of preparing this record will be assessed as part of the costs of this appeal 

upon issuance of this Court’s judgment.

Clerk’s signature: 

 Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the Court

Date: December 10, 2015
§ 1211.5 General testing parameters. ( a ) The following test parameters are to be used in the investigation of the circuit covered by § 1211.4(c) for compliance with either, UL 991, or Supplement SA of UL 325-2017 (incorporated by reference, see § 1211.40): ( 1 ) With regard to electrical supervision of critical components, an operator being inoperative with respect to closing movement of the door meets the criteria for trouble indication.
( 2 ) A field strength of 3 volts per meter is to be used for the Radiated EMI Test.
( 3 ) The Composite Operational and Cycling Test is to be used for 14 days at temperature extremes of minus 35 °Celsius (minus 31 °F) and 70 °C (158 °F).
( 4 ) Exposure Class H5 is to be used for the Humidity Test.
( 5 ) A vibration level of 5g is to be used for the Vibration Test.
( 6 ) When a Computational Investigation is conducted, λp shall not be greater than 6 failures/106 hours for the entire system. For external secondary entrapment protection devices or systems that are sold separately, λp shall not be greater than 0 failures/106 hours. For internal secondary entrapment protection devices or systems whether or not they are sold separately, λp shall not be greater than 0 failures/106 hours. The operational test is conducted for 14 days. An external secondary entrapment protection device or system that is sold separately, and that has a λp greater than 0 failures/106 hours meets the intent of the requirement when for the combination of the operator and the specified external secondary entrapment protection device or system λp does not exceed 6 failures/106 hours. See § 1211.18(j) through (l).
( 7 ) When the Demonstrated Method Test is conducted, the multiplier is to be based on the continuous usage level, and a minimum of 24 units for a minimum of 24 hours per unit are to be tested.
( 8 ) The Endurance test is to be conducted concurrently with the Operational test. The control shall perform its intended function while being conditioned for fourteen days in an ambient air temperature of 60 °C (140 °F), or 10 °C (18 °F) greater than the operating temperature of the control, whichever is higher. During the test, the control is to be operated in a manner representing the opening and closing of the door at a rate of one open-close operation per minute.
( 9 ) For the Electrical Fast Transient Burst Test, test level 3 is to be used for residential garage door operators.
( b ) In the evaluation of entrapment protection circuits used in residential garage door operators, the critical condition flow chart shown in figure 1 to subpart A shall be used: ( 1 ) To conduct a failure-mode and effect analysis (FMEA);
( 2 ) In investigating the performance during the Environmental Stress Tests;
( 3 ) During the Power Cycling Safety for Tests in accordance with UL 991 (incorporated by reference, see § 1211.40); and
( 4 ) During evaluation of the circuit to the requirements of Supplement SA of UL 325-2017 (incorporated by reference, see § 1211.40).
[57 FR 60455, Dec. 21, 1992, as amended at 62 FR 46667, Sept. 4, 1997; 65 FR 70657, Nov. 27, 2000; 81 FR 20228, Apr. 7, 2016; 83 FR 32568, July 13, 2018]
#### Howard Carlson by C. G. Carlson, Defendant in Error, v. Simeon Swenson, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 31,086.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Harry Olson, Judge, presiding.

Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1915.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed January 11, 1916.

Statement of the Case.

Action by Howard Carlson, a minor, by C. G-. Carlson, his next friend, plaintiff, .against Simeon Swenson, defendant, to recover for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff by having fall on him a radiator placed in the lobby of the defendant’s theater. From a judgment for the plaintiff, the defendant brings error.

AlBert O. Olson, for plaintiff in error; James J. Leahy, of counsel.

*415Abstract of the Decision.

1. Appeal and error, § *538*
      ***
      *—when error in refusing motion to direct verdict not preserved for review.*Where on the court’s refusal of the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict made at the close of the plaintiff’s case, the defendant introduces proof and fails to renew his motion at the close of all the evidence, the point that such refusal was erroneous is not preserved for review.

2. Appeal and error, § *800*
      ***
      *—when motion for new trial and ruling thereon need not appear in hill of exceptions as basis for review.*Since the Amendment of 1911 to section 81 of the Practice Act (J. & A. If 8618) dispensing with the necessity of incorporating formal exceptions in the record, it seems that the former rule of practice, requiring that to preserve for review the refusal of a new trial the motion therefor and ruling thereon must appear in the hill of exceptions, no longer applies where the transcript of the record contains a specific order of the court overruling and denying the motion as such order presumably would not have been entered had the motion not been made, and as it need not have been in writing nor an exception to the ruling preserved, the reason for the rule has failed.

3. Theaters and shows, § *4*
      ***
      *—when evidence sufficient to sustain verdict for damages for personal injuries.*A verdict for the plaintiff for personal injuries is not manifestly against the weight of evidence where the evidence tends to show that defendant eonductéd a theater on his premises, in the lobby of which were pictures and advertisements hung for the public to come in and see, and that in the wall of the lobby a radiator was so insecurely fastened that without apparent negligence on the part of the plaintiff, a minor, it fell out of its place upon him and injured him while he was looking at the pictures, the circumstances being such as to raise the inference of neglect on the part of defendant to have the radiator so fastened that it would not fall over from contact with it such as might be expected in a public place.

John E. Anderson, for defendant in error; George B. Cohen, of connsel.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### § 1512.13 Requirements for front fork.

The front fork shall be tested for strength by application of at least 39.5 J (350 in-lb) of energy in accordance with the fork test, § 1512.18(k)(1), without visible evidence of fracture. Sidewalk bicycles need not meet this requirement.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3539 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3539

To terminate the HOPE VI program of the Department of Housing and Urban 
                              Development.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 1, 2011

 Mr. Canseco introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Appropriations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To terminate the HOPE VI program of the Department of Housing and Urban 
                              Development.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``HOPE VI Program Termination Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF HOPE VI PROGRAM.

    (a) Repeal of Grant Authority.--Section 24 of the United States 
Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437v) is hereby repealed.
    (b) Treatment of Remaining Funds.--Notwithstanding the repeal under 
subsection (a) of this section, any amounts made available under 
section 24 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 and obligated 
before the date of the enactment of this Act shall continue to be 
governed by such section, as in effect immediately before such repeal, 
and any other applicable provisions of law.
    (c) Termination.--Upon the completion of outlays to liquidate all 
amounts referred to in subsection (b) of this section and the 
completion of all activities with respect to such amounts pursuant to 
subsection (b), the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall 
terminate the HOPE VI program authorized under section 24 of the United 
States Housing Act of 1937.
    (d) Rescission of Funding.--Effective on the date of the enactment 
of this Act, there are rescinded and permanently canceled all 
unobligated balances remaining available as of such date of enactment 
of any amounts made available under section 24 of the United States 
Housing Act of 1937. All such unobligated balances so rescinded and 
permanently canceled shall be covered into the General Fund of the 
Treasury for reducing the budget deficit of the Federal Government.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3413 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3413

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 1449 West Avenue in Bronx, New York, as the ``Private Isaac T. 
                         Cortes Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 14, 2011

  Mr. Crowley (for himself, Mr. Ackerman, Mr. Bishop of New York, Ms. 
Buerkle, Ms. Clarke of New York, Mr. Engel, Mr. Gibson, Mr. Grimm, Mr. 
Hanna, Ms. Hayworth, Mr. Higgins, Mr. Hinchey, Mr. Israel, Mr. King of 
  New York, Mrs. Lowey, Mrs. Maloney, Mrs. McCarthy of New York, Mr. 
 Meeks, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Owens, Mr. Rangel, Mr. Reed, Mr. Serrano, Ms. 
   Slaughter, Mr. Tonko, Mr. Towns, Mr. Turner of New York, and Ms. 
  Velazquez) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 1449 West Avenue in Bronx, New York, as the ``Private Isaac T. 
                         Cortes Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRIVATE ISAAC T. CORTES POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1449 West Avenue in Bronx, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Private Isaac T. Cortes Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Private 
Isaac T. Cortes Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Little Sioux CornProcessors, L.L.C. (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended December 31,2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Stephen Roe, President and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.             The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.             The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |                                     | /s/  Stephen Roe |
|--------|------------------------------------------|------------------|
|   | Stephen  Roe                             |
|   | *President  and Chief Executive Officer* |
|   |                                     |
|   | Dated:  February 19, 2008           |

 

----