alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                        |
|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                        |  |
| Name of Subsidiary                                     | Organized Under Laws of |
| American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania     | Pennsylvania |
| CNA Insurance Company Limited                          | United Kingdom |
| CNA Surety Corporation (CNA Surety)                    | Delaware |
| Columbia Casualty Company                              | Illinois |
| Continental Assurance Company (CAC)                    | Illinois |
| Continental Casualty Company (CCC)                     | Illinois |
| Continental Reinsurance Corporation International, Ltd | Bermuda |
| CNA Europe Holdings Limited                            | United Kingdom |
| National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford            | Illinois |
| North Rock Insurance Company Limited                   | Bermuda |
| Surety Bonding Company of America                      | South Dakota |
| The Continental Corporation (Continental)              | New York |
| The Continental Insurance Company (CIC)                | Pennsylvania |
| The Continental Insurance Company of New Jersey        | New Jersey |
| Transportation Insurance Company                       | Illinois |
| Universal Surety of America                            | South Dakota |
| Valley Forge Insurance Company                         | Pennsylvania |
| Western Surety Company                                 | South Dakota |
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth
No. 02

- 18

- 00053

- CV
J. C URT L UCAS AND I NVENIAS P ARTNERS LLC, Appellants

V

.

C YNDI R AMIREZ R YAN , Appellees § § § § On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 of Denton County (CV

- 2016

- 02101) June 2 7 , 2019 Opinion by Justice Kerr JUDGMENT This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there was error in part of the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part , reversed and rendered in part , and reversed and remanded in part . We affirm the trial court’s order denying Appellants J. Curt Lucas ’s
and Invenias Partners LLC ’s special appearances

. We reverse the trial court’s judgment; render judgment that Appellee Cyndi Ramire z Ryan take nothing on her claims for breach of contract, promissory estoppel, and negligent misrepresentation;and remand Ryan’s quantum

- meruit claim to the trial court for a new trial on both liability and damages

. We order Lucas and Invenias to pay one

- half of the costs of this appeal and Ryan to pay one

- half of the costs of this appeal

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _ /s/ Elizabeth Kerr

__________________ Justice Elizabeth Kerr
S. Ct. order filed 3/17/03;

case is vacated and remanded
Petition for cert granted by

order filed 3/10/03; opinion

filed 3/15/02 is vacated
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6123

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CURTIS SIFFORD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Williams, Senior

District Judge, sitting by designation. (CR-96-134-V, CA-01-157-3)

Submitted: March 4, 2002 Decided: March 15, 2002

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis Sifford, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, Assistant

United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
4

PER CURIAM:

Curtis Sifford seeks to appeal the district court’s orders (1)

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001)

as untimely; and (2) denying his subsequent Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e)

motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Sifford, Nos. CR-96-134-

V; CA-01-157-3 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 16, 2001; Dec. 7, 2001). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### §11044. Public availability of plans, data sheets, forms, and followup notices

#### (a) Availability to public

Each emergency response plan, material safety data sheet, list described in section 11021(a)(2) of this title, inventory form, toxic chemical release form, and followup emergency notice shall be made available to the general public, consistent with section 11042 of this title, during normal working hours at the location or locations designated by the Administrator, Governor, State emergency response commission, or local emergency planning committee, as appropriate. Upon request by an owner or operator of a facility subject to the requirements of section 11022 of this title, the State emergency response commission and the appropriate local emergency planning committee shall withhold from disclosure under this section the location of any specific chemical required by section 11022(d)(2) of this title to be contained in an inventory form as tier II information.

#### (b) Notice of public availability

Each local emergency planning committee shall annually publish a notice in local newspapers that the emergency response plan, material safety data sheets, and inventory forms have been submitted under this section. The notice shall state that followup emergency notices may subsequently be issued. Such notice shall announce that members of the public who wish to review any such plan, sheet, form, or followup notice may do so at the location designated under subsection (a).

(Pub. L. 99–499, title III, §324, Oct. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 1752.)
§ 1211.15 Vertically moving combination rigid one-piece overhead residential garage door and operator system. ( a ) A vertically moving combination rigid one-piece overhead residential garage door and operator system shall comply with the applicable residential garage door operator requirements in this standard and shall additionally comply with the following: ( 1 ) The speed of the door edge during the opening or closing motion shall not exceed 6 in (152 mm) per second.
( 2 ) The system shall be supplied with two additional independent secondary entrapment protection devices complying with Secondary Entrapment Protection, § 1211.8. When photoelectric sensors are used, a minimum of two sensors in addition to a third secondary device shall be supplied. The instructions shall state that one photoelectric sensor shall be positioned to comply with § 1211.11 and the other(s) shall be positioned on the left and right sides of the door to detect solid objects that would be within the space where the door moves as it opens or closes.
( 3 ) A means to manually detach both door operators from the door shall be provided. For systems where the mechanical drive is located on a wall adjacent to the door, the manual detachment means is not required to comply with § 1211.9(a). Instead, the manual detachment means shall be located 5 ft (1.52 m) above the floor, shall not require a torque of more than 5 ft-lb (6.78 N-m) to initiate disconnection when the door is obstructed, and shall be clearly marked with operating instructions adjacent to the mechanism. The gripping surface (handle) shall be colored red and shall be distinguishable from the rest of the operator. The marking which includes instructions for detaching the operator shall be provided in accordance with § 1211.17(a), (b), and (j) as applicable.
( 4 ) A means (interlock) shall be supplied to de-energize the operator whenever the operator is manually detached from the door.
( 5 ) A means (interlock) shall be supplied to de-energize the operator whenever an operable window or access (service) door that is mounted in the garage door is opened perpendicular to the surface of the garage door.
( 6 ) The door shall not move outward from the exterior wall surface during the opening or closing cycle.
( 7 ) The moving parts of the door or door system (mounting hardware, track assembly, and components that make up the door) shall be guarded.
( 8 ) A horizontal track assembly, including installation hardware, shall support a dead load equal to the door weight when the door is in the horizontal position.
( 9 ) Instructions for the installation of operable windows and access (service) doors and the interlocks specified in paragraph (a)(5) of this section shall be supplied with the operator.
( b ) [Reserved]
[81 FR 20235, Apr. 7, 2016]
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)     May 4, 2015





CNA FINANCIAL CORPORATION(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware1-582336-6169860(State or other jurisdiction(Commission(IRS Employerof incorporation)File Number)Identification No.)











333 S. Wabash, Chicago, Illinois60604(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)





Registrant's telephone number, including area code     (312) 822-5000





NOT APPLICABLE(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)


Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions ( see General Instruction A.2. below):


[ ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


[ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)


[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))








1


---




ITEM 2.02 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION.


On May 4, 2015, the registrant issued a press release and posted on its website ( www.cna.com ) a financial supplement providing information on its results of operations for the first quarter 2015.  The press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 and the financial supplement is furnished as Exhibit 99.2 to this Form 8-K.


The information under Item 2.02 and in Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2 in this Current Report is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for the purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section.  The information under Item 2.02 and in Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2 in this Current Report shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.





ITEM 9.01 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.


(d) Exhibits:


See Exhibit Index.


2


---




SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





CNA Financial Corporation(Registrant)Date:  May 4, 2015By/s/ D. Craig Mense(Signature)D. Craig MenseExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer





3


---




EXHIBIT INDEX





Exhibit No.Description99.1CNA Financial Corporation press release, issued May 4, 2015, providing information on the first quarter 2015 results of operations.99.2CNA Financial Corporation financial supplement, posted on its website May 4, 2015, providing supplemental financial information on the first quarter 2015.





4
August 18, 2015 

IN RESPONSE, PLEASE 

 REFER TO: M150806B 

 

MEMORANDUM TO: Mark A. Satorius 

 Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Annette Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS MEMORANDUM – STRATEGIC 

PROGRAMMATIC OVERVIEW OF THE OPERATING 

REACTORS BUSINESS LINE, 9:30 A.M., THURSDAY, AUGUST 

6, 2015, COMMISSIONERS’ CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE 

WHITE FLINT NORTH, ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND (OPEN TO 

PUBLIC ATTENDANCE) 

The Commission was briefed by NRC staff on strategic considerations associated with the 

Operating Reactors Business Line. 

The staff should ensure that individual changes to the Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) are 

assessed for aggregate impacts, to avoid any unintended consequences. As the staff considers 

its currently proposed revisions to the Significance Determination Process, they should pilot the 

revisions and hold public meetings or workshops to clarify their approach to risk-informing the 

process. 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA 

 OIG 

 OPA 

 Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR
§ 3.15 Amendments and supplemental pleadings. ( a ) *Amendments* — ( 1 ) *By leave.* If and whenever determination of a controversy on the merits will be facilitated thereby, the Administrative Law Judge may, upon such conditions as are necessary to avoid prejudicing the public interest and the rights of the parties, allow appropriate amendments to pleadings or notice of hearing: *Provided, however,* That a motion for amendment of a complaint or notice may be allowed by the Administrative Law Judge only if the amendment is reasonably within the scope of the original complaint or notice. Motions for other amendments of complaints or notices shall be certified to the Commission.
( 2 ) *Conformance to evidence.* When issues not raised by the pleadings or notice of hearing but reasonably within the scope of the original complaint or notice of hearing are tried by express or implied consent of the parties, they shall be treated in all respects as if they had been raised in the pleadings or notice of hearing; and such amendments of the pleadings or notice as may be necessary to make them conform to the evidence and to raise such issues shall be allowed at any time.
( b ) *Supplemental pleadings.* The Administrative Law Judge may, upon reasonable notice and such terms as are just, permit service of a supplemental pleading or notice setting forth transactions, occurrences, or events which have happened since the date of the pleading or notice sought to be supplemented and which are relevant to any of the issues involved.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3564 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3564

To repeal the requirements under the United States Housing Act of 1937 
 for residents of public housing to engage in community service and to 
              complete economic self-sufficiency programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 6, 2011

  Mr. Rangel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal the requirements under the United States Housing Act of 1937 
 for residents of public housing to engage in community service and to 
              complete economic self-sufficiency programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Public Housing Tenants Respect Act 
of 2011''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF PUBLIC HOUSING COMMUNITY SERVICE AND FAMILY SELF-
              SUFFICIENCY REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 12 of the United States Housing Act of 
1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437j) is amended by striking subsections (c) through 
(g).
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--The United States Housing Act of 1937 
is amended--
            (1) in section 5A(d)(12) (42 U.S.C. 1437c-1(d)(12))--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ``and'' after 
                the semicolon;
                    (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking the semicolon 
                and inserting a period; and
                    (C) by striking subparagraph (C);
            (2) in section 6(l)(1) (42 U.S.C. 1437d(l)(1)), by striking 
        ``except for noncompliance'' and all that follows through 
        ``based on such noncompliance''; and
            (3) in section 9(e)(1)(H) (42 U.S.C. 1437g(e)(1)(H)), by 
        striking ``a public housing work program under section 12'' and 
        inserting ``any program that provides work for residents of 
        public housing''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 18 (Monday, January 28, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 434-435]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00168]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

[[Page 435]]

    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases Initial Review Group; Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and 
Skin Diseases Clinical Trials Review Committee.
    Date: February 7, 2019.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Canopy by Hilton, 940 Rose Avenue, North Bethesda, MD 
20852.
    Contact Person: Nakia C. Brown, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, 6701 Democracy Blvd., RM 816, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-827-
4905, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2e4c5c415940404f4d6e434f47420040474600494158"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a9cbdbc6dec7c7c8cae9c4c8c0c587c7c0c187cec6df">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in 
advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of 
December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, 
Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 18, 2019.
Sylvia L. Neal,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-00168 Filed 1-25-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
409 P.2d 265

#### Jacob CARIAN, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS of the State of New Mexico, Respondent.

No. 7874.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Jan. 3, 1966.

*631A. L. Strong, Malcolm G. Colberg, Albuquerque, for petitioner.

Marrón & Houk, Albuquerque, for respondent.

CARMODY, Chief Justice.

Petitioner seeks a review of the decision of the Board of Bar Examiners, denying his application for admission to the New Mexico State Bar upon motion.

Except for the difference of name, the excerpt of the minutes of the Board of Bar Examiners is identical with that set out in the opinion in Rask v. Board of Bar Examiners, 75 N.M. 617, 409 P.2d 256.

Following graduation from Marquette University in 1951 with a degree of LL.B., petitioner was admitted to practice before the Supreme Court of Wisconsin and, from March 1951 until September 1964, he generally held himself out as an attorney and actively and continuously practiced law in West Allis (a suburb of Milwaukee), Wisconsin.

It appears that the applicant is in all respects qualified to become a member of the New Mexico Bar and is of good moral character.

For the reasons stated in Rask, the decisión of the Board of Bar Examiners is reversed, and petitioner’s motion for admission will be granted. It is so ordered.

CHAVEZ, NOBLE, MOISE, and COMPTON, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of MediciNova, Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the Report),
I, Yuichi Iwaki, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of MediciNova, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of MediciNova, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This certification has not been, and
shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



Date: August 11, 2006By:

/S/    YUICHI IWAKIYuichi Iwaki, M.D., Ph.D. President and Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Donald B. Winship, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction affirmed. All concur. (Appeal from á judgment of Erie Trial Term, convicting defendant of the crime of robbery second degree.) Present — Vaughan, J. P., Kimball, Piper, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ.
#### § 742.12 [Reserved]