alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
 PURSUANT TO 
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Colombia Goldfields Ltd. for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
to my knowledge, that: (1)
	the quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Colombia Goldfields Ltd. for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
	the information contained in the quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Colombia Goldfields Ltd..  By: /s/ T.W. LoughName:
T. W. Lough 
Title:
President and Principal Accounting Officer 
Date:
August 12 , 2009


---
§ 16.15 Reports of advisory committees. ( a ) The Commission shall furnish, on a fiscal year basis, a report of the activities of each of its advisory committees to the GSA.
( b ) Results of the annual comprehensive review of the advisory committee made under § 16.11 shall be included in the annual report.
( c ) The Commission shall notify the GSA, by letter, of the termination of, changes in the membership of, or other significant developments with respect to, an advisory committee.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3613 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to allow for fair application 

of the exceptions process for drugs in tiers in formularies in prescription 

drug plans under Medicare part D. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 8, 2011 

Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia (for himself, Mr. FARR, Mr. KISSELL, Ms. JACKSON

LEE of Texas, Mr. CONYERS, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. HONDA, Mr. 

GRIJALVA, Mr. MICHAUD, Ms. RICHARDSON, Ms. FUDGE, Mr. RYAN of 

Ohio, Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, Mr. CARSON of Indiana, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. 

OLVER, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. CLAY, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, 

Mr. BOSWELL, Mr. FILNER, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Ms. 

NORTON, Mr. DEUTCH, Mr. HINCHEY, Ms. MOORE, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. LEWIS of 

Georgia, Mr. KILDEE, and Mr. JONES) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in 

addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to allow 

for fair application of the exceptions process for drugs 

in tiers in formularies in prescription drug plans under 

Medicare part D. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3613 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Part D Beneficiary 

3 Appeals Fairness Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FAIR EXCEPTIONS PROCESS FOR DRUG IN TIERS 

5 UNDER MEDICARE PART D. 

6 Section 1860D–4(g)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 

7 U.S.C. 1395w–103(g)(2)) is amended— 

8 (1) in the first sentence— 

9 (A) by striking ‘‘for tiered cost-sharing for 

10 drugs included within a formulary and’’ and in11 serting ‘‘for any tiered cost-sharing structure 

12 within a formulary (including a structure that’’; 

13 and 

14 (B) by inserting ‘‘, or provides for different 

15 co-payment or coinsurance amounts for drugs 

16 in different tiers included within the for17 mulary)’’ before ‘‘, a part D eligible individual’’; 

18 (2) in the second sentence, by inserting ‘‘in any 

19 plan formulary’’ before ‘‘could be covered’’; and 

20 (3) by inserting the following before the last 

21 sentence: ‘‘In no case may the Secretary allow a 

22 PDP sponsor to make any element of the tiered 

23 cost-sharing structure (including a tier used for very 

24 high cost or unique items) ineligible for lower-cost 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3613 IH

1 sharing through an exception under this para2 graph.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### SUBCHAPTER II—ESTABLISHMENT, POWERS, AND ORGANIZATION OF CORPORATION
§ 971.900 Applicability. The regulations of this subpart govern the following hearings conducted by NOAA under this part and under 15 CFR part 970: ( a ) All adjudicatory hearings required by section 116(b) of the Act to be held on the following actions upon a finding by the Administrator that one or more specific and material issues of fact exist which require resolution by formal process, including but not limited to: ( 1 ) All applications for issuance or transfer of licenses or permits;
( 2 ) All proposed TCRs on a license or permit; and
( 3 ) All proposals to modify significantly a license or permit;
( b ) Hearings conducted under section 105(b)(3) of the Act on objection by a licensee or permittee to any term, condition or restriction in a license or permit, or to modification thereto, where the licensee or permittee demonstrates, after final action by the Administrator on the objection, that a dispute remains as to a material issue of fact;
( c ) Hearings conducted in accordance with section 106(b) of the Act pursuant to a timely request by an applicant or a licensee or permittee for review of: ( 1 ) A proposed denial of issuance or transfer of a license or permit; or
( 2 ) A proposed suspension or modification of particular activities under a license or permit after a Presidential determination pursuant to section 106(a)(2)(B) of the Act;
( d ) Hearings conducted in accordance with section 308(c) of the Act to amend regulations for the purpose of conservation of natural resources, protection of the environment, and safety of life and property at sea;
( e ) Hearings conducted in accordance with § 971.302 or 15 CFR 970.407 on a proposal to deny certification of an application; and
( f ) Hearings conducted in accordance with 15 CFR part 970, subpart C to determine priority of right among preenactment explorers.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Inergy Holdings, L.P. (the Company) on this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended December 31,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John J. Sherman, Chief Executive Officer of Inergy Holdings, L.P., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ John J. ShermanJohn J. Sherman Chief Executive
OfficerMay 19, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32





CLARCOR Inc.


Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





We hereby certify that the accompanying Quarterly Report of CLARCOR Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended February 27, 2016 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CLARCOR Inc.





March 18, 2016By/s/ Christopher L. Conway(Date)Christopher L. ConwayPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMarch 18, 2016By/s/ David J. Fallon(Date)David J. FallonChief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer
#### § 1238.1 Scope.

This part establishes a consumer product safety standard for stationary activity centers.
#### Lillian I. Dunning, Respondent, v. Frank E. Dunning, Appellant.

Present — Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Deyo and Santry, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel Review of One Unsolicited K22 Application.                    

*Date:*                         December 14, 2004.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 2 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Rockledge 6700, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Quirijn Vos, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-496-2550,                         *qvos@niaid.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 22, 2004.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-26362  Filed 11-29-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### Anne Unterman, Appellant, v. Irving Unterman et al., Respondents.

Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Roman Levites, Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 176]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard D. Carruthers, J.), rendered July 1, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree (two counts) and robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 6 to 12 years, 6 to 12 years and 4 to 8 years, respectively, and order, same court and Justice, entered on or about June 23, 2003, which denied defendant’s CPL 440.20 motion to set aside the sentence, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly allowed the prosecutor to elicit a prior *736statement of the victim which was recorded by the arresting officer in the on-line booking sheet. On cross-examination, defense counsel had questioned the arresting officer about several documents relating to the case, including the felony complaint, in which the officer had omitted any mention of a weapon. The inference counsel wanted the jury to draw from cross-examination was that the omissions of any mention of a gun indicated either that the victim had never said anything about a gun to the officer or that the officer was careless with his paperwork. Accordingly, the People were entitled on redirect examination to elicit both what the victim had told the officer about a gun and that the officer wrote in the on-line booking sheet that defendant may have had a gun *(see People v Boyd, 58*NY2d 1016, 1018 [1983]; *People v Whitley,*14 AD3d 403, 406 [2005], *lv denied*4 NY3d 892 [2005]).

The record does not establish that defendant’s sentence was based on any improper criteria, and we perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Catterson, McGuire and Malone, JJ.
© 2014 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations 

Institute of Nuclear Power Operations

INPO Perspectives

NRC Buried and Underground Piping Meeting

June 11, 2014 

Joe Sears

Manager, Nuclear Asset Protection
© 2014 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations 

Key Topics

• INPO’s NEI 09-14 role 

• Industry Performance 

–Plant evaluations

–Operating experience

•ICES reporting
© 2014 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations 

NEI 09-14 INPO’s Role

• Evaluate programs.

• Communicate issues to the industry.

• Compile and report operating 

experience.
© 2014 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations 

Key Topics

• INPO’s NEI 09-14 role 

• Industry Performance 

–Plant evaluations

–Operating experience

•ICES reporting

• Questions
© 2014 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations 

Areas for Improvement

5

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Leaks Program U/G & CP CP TOTAL AFIs
© 2014 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations 

2014 Summary

• Two AFIs; Four Performance Deficiencies

– Two – underground piping

– Four – cathodic protection

• Improvement needed

– Degraded coatings and cathodic protection not 

properly maintained

– Cathodic protection equipment work 

prioritization and completion

– Cathodic protection site knowledge weaknesses

– Leaks occurring and the source is not 

determined
© 2014 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations 

Good Underground Piping Program 

Attributes

• ICES reporting quality improvement

• Zero leak tolerance – especially in piping 

containing radioactive fluids

• Cathodic protection installed and maintained

• Failure causes identified

• Effective station and corporate oversight

• Effective use of corrective action program 
© 2014 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations 

Key Topics

• INPO’s NEI 09-14 role 

• Industry Performance 

–Plant evaluations

–Operating experience

•ICES reporting
© 2014 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations 

May 2014 Number of Reported Events by 

Year and Failure Mode

80 106 93 106 106

18

8

15

8

5 4

6 12 6 5 5

3

2

4 13 3

4

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Adverse inspection 

finding (requires 

immediate repair)

Other degradation 

or maintenance

Significant leak

Leak

Source: ICES
© 2014 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations 

Most Commonly Affected Systems

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

 Relative to NEI 09-14
© 2014 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations 

Contains 

Licensed Material

5%

Safety Related

7%

Contains 

Environmentally 

Hazardous Fluid

5%

Other Buried 

Piping-run to 

failure

71%

Other Buried 

Piping-not run to 

failure

12%

Buried Pipe Events Classification
### Court of Appeals, State of Michigan

ORDER

Sean Hightower v Department of Transportation

Docket No. 348224

LC No. 18

- 000256

- MD Mark J. Cavanagh Presiding Judge

Jane M. Beckering

Elizabeth L. Gleicher

Judges

The Court on its own motion

, orders that the April 16, 2020 opinion is hereby AMENDED. The opinion is modified on section II with minor, non

- substantive changes to eliminate an incomplete sentence. The opinion is amended as follows:

The old opinion read: to Hightower’s brief on appeal, “once it is determined that a disability exists, the 180

- day provisions is automatically invoked.”

The new opinion reads: According to Hightower’s brief on appeal, “once it is det ermined that a disability exists, the 180

- day provisions is automatically invoked.”

In all other respects, the April 16, 2020, opinion remains unchanged.

______________________________ Presiding Judge
Amendment to Directors' Deferred Stock Investment Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.9 
 AMENDMENT TO THE 
 REGIONS FINANCIAL CORPORATION 
 DIRECTORS’ DEFERRED STOCK INVESTMENT PLAN 
 This amendment to the Regions Financial Corporation Directors’ Deferred Stock Investment Plan (the “Plan”) is made and executed effective as of May 1, 2007 (the “Effective Date”). The
purpose of this amendment is to eliminate the Company Contribution set forth in Article IV and mentioned in various sections of the Plan for Director’s Fees earned on or after May 1, 2007. 
 The Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
 1. 
 Article IV is hereby amended by adding the following to the end of said Article:

 Notwithstanding the above, there shall be no Company contributions for Director’s Fees earned on or after May 1,
2007. 
 2. 
 Article XX is hereby amended by deleting in its entirety the third paragraph of such Article and replacing it as follows: 
 Effective May 1, 2007, there will be no Company contributions for Director’s Fees earned on or after May 1, 2007. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Regions Financial Corporation has caused this Amendment to be executed on this 14th day of May 2007, by its duly authorized officer, to be effective as provided above. 
  

			
	 REGIONS FINANCIAL CORPORATINON

		
	 By:
	 	 /S/    DAVID B. EDMONDS

		 	David B. Edmonds
	 Its:
	 	Senior Executive Vice President
		 	Human Resources Group
Incorporation by Reference Docket ID No. EPA - HQ - OAR - 20 13 - 0 291 October 21, 2014 The contents of the following dockets are hereby incorporated by reference into and are considered to be included in, contained in , and to have been placed in Docket EPA

- HQ

- OAR

20 13

- 0 291 ( National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Brick and Structural Clay Products Manufacturing ): 1) A

- 9 9

- 3 0 ( National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Brick and Structural Clay Products Manufact uring; Proposed Rule ) 2) OAR

- 2002

- 0054 ( National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Brick and Structural Clay Products Manufacturing; Final Rule ) Accessing dockets : Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically th rough http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the EPA Docket Center, WJC West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave
. , NW, Washington, DC
. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566

- 1744 and the telephone number for the EPA Docket Center is (202) 566

- 1742
.
#### In the Matter of Ramon Reyes, Petitioner, v Donald Selsky, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

[821 NYS2d 477]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

A misbehavior report charged petitioner with violating the prison disciplinary rules against soliciting others to smuggle, conspiring to bring drugs into the facility and third-party calls. The charges arose after an investigation revealed that petitioner solicited a visitor to collect money from other inmates and smuggle heroin into the facility. Petitioner was found guilty of the charges following a tier III disciplinary hearing, but the charge of third-party calls was dismissed on administrative appeal. Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination of guilt on the other two charges.

*1119We confirm. The misbehavior report and testimony of the reporting officer provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt *(see Matter of Hicks v Goord,*28 AD3d 894, 894 [2006]; *Matter of Vizcaino v Selsky,*26 AD3d 574, 574 [2006], *lv denied*7 NY3d 708 [2006]). Petitioner has demonstrated no prejudice from the fact that the reporting officer did not sign petitioner’s copy of the misbehavior report inasmuch as a signed copy was present at the hearing and petitioner called the author of the report as a witness, but declined the opportunity to question that officer about the absent signature and has failed to show how he was prejudiced by this oversight *(see Matter of Mohammad v Goord,*19 AD3d 781, 781 [2005]; *Matter of Goncalves v Donnelly,*9 AD3d 721, 721-722 [2004]). Moreover, although no drugs were recovered during the investigation, the nature of the charges required proof only that petitioner solicited and conspired with another to effect their delivery *(see Matter of Long v Department of Correctional Servs. of N.Y.,*252 AD2d 698, 698 [1998]), and the record reveals that the visitor admitted upon his arrest that he was smuggling drugs for petitioner. Petitioner’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for our review or lack merit.

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Spain, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the
accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MediciNova, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael Coffee,
as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: May 16, 2011By:

/S/    MICHAEL
COFFEEMichael Coffee Chief Business Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and such certification is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
± August 2008

0 1 2 4

Miles

Light Seagrass Scarring

Moderate Seagrass Scarring

Severe Seagrass Scarring

St. Joseph Bay Aquatic Preserve

Seagrass Scarring in St. Joseph Bay