alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

KMART HOLDING CORPORATION

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION 1

In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Kmart Holding
Corporation for the period ended October 27, 2004, each of the undersigned
officers of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his
knowledge:

1.   this Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in this Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     Kmart Holding Corporation.

Date: February 11, 2005


/s/ Aylwin B. Lewis
-------------------------------------
Aylwin B. Lewis
President and Chief Executive Officer


/s/ James D. Donlon, III
-------------------------------------
James D. Donlon, III
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

Footnote 1:

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures
that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Kmart Holding
Corporation and will be retained by Kmart Holding Corporation and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-31264

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

HUGH ROBINSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. CR-95-27-B

- - - - - - - - - -

February 10, 1998

Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Hugh Robinson appeals his sentence for possession of cocaine

with intent to distribute. Robinson argues that the district

court clearly erred in holding him responsible for 9.961

kilograms of cocaine and in imposing a sentence enhancement for

obstruction of justice. Having reviewed the record and the

briefs of the parties, we AFFIRM. See United States v. Vital, 68

F.3d 114, 120 (5th Cir. 1995); United States v. Pofahl, 990 F.2d

1456, 1481-82 (5th Cir. 1993).

AFFIRMED.
### SUBCHAPTER VII—DISPOSAL OF WAR AND VETERANS' HOUSING
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# Package: Amendment No. 5 to Certificate of Compliance No. 1031 for the MAGNASTOR Storage System.

Accession Number: ML15180A364

Date Released: Tuesday, June 30, 2015

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML15180A365 - Letter to W. Fowler re: Package: Amendment No. 5 to Certificate of Compliance No. 1031 for the MAGNASTOR Storage System. (3 page(s), 6/29/2015)
    - ML15180A368 - Enclosure 1: Certificate of Compliance No. 1031 [Letter to W. Fowler re: Package: Amendment No. 5 to Certificate of Compliance No. 1031 for the MAGNASTOR Storage System]. (5 page(s), 6/29/2015)
    - ML15180A374 - Enclosure 2: Technical Specifications Appendix A [Letter to W. Fowler re: Package: Amendment No. 5 to Certificate of Compliance No. 1031 for the MAGNASTOR Storage System]. (46 page(s), 6/29/2015)
    - ML15180A379 - Enclosure 3: Technical Specifications Appendix B [Letter to W. Fowler re: Package: Amendment No. 5 to Certificate Of Compliance No. 1031 for the MAGNASTOR Storage System]. (144 page(s), 6/29/2015)
    - ML15180A381 - Enclosure 4: Final Safety Evaluation Report [Letter to W. Fowler re: Package: Amendment No. 5 to Certificate Of Compliance No. 1031 for the MAGNASTOR Storage System]. (17 page(s), 6/29/2015)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
EXHIBIT 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of IDI Global, Inc., on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Kevin R. Griffith, Chief Executive Officer, and Steve Weatherly, a consultant performing certain services for the Company commonly provided by a Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: April 16, 2007 /s/ Kevin R. Griffith Kevin R. Griffith Chief Executive Officer   Date: April 16, 2007 /s/ Steve Weatherly Steve Weatherly Consultant performing certain services for the Company commonly provided by a Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
### §§1320c–14 to 1320c–19. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 1320c–14 to 1320c–19 were omitted in the general revision of this part by Pub. L. 97–248, title I, §143, Sept. 3, 1982, 96 Stat. 382.

Section 1320c–14, act Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XI, §1165, as added Oct. 30, 1972, Pub. L. 92–603, title II, §249F(b), 86 Stat. 1443, related to correlation of functions between Professional Standards Review Organizations and administrative instrumentalities.

Section 1320c–15, act Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XI, §1166, as added Oct. 30, 1972, Pub. L. 92–603, title II, §249F(b), 86 Stat. 1443; amended Oct. 25, 1977, Pub. L. 95–142, §5(h), 91 Stat. 1189, related to general prohibition against disclosure of data or information and exceptions to such prohibition. See section 1320c–9 of this title.

Section 1320c–16, act Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XI, §1167, as added Oct. 30, 1972, Pub. L. 92–603, title II, §249F(b), 86 Stat. 1443; amended Oct. 25, 1977, Pub. L. 95–142, §5(i), (n), 91 Stat. 1190, 1191, related to limitation of liability of persons providing information to Professional Standards Review Organizations and Statewide Professional Standards Review Councils. See section 1320c–6 of this title.

Section 1320c–17, act Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XI, §1168, as added Oct. 30, 1972, Pub. L. 92–603, title II, §249F(b), 86 Stat. 1444; amended Dec. 31, 1975, Pub. L. 94–182, title I, §112(c), 89 Stat. 1055; Oct. 25, 1977, Pub. L. 95–142, §5(j), 91 Stat. 1190; Aug. 13, 1981, Pub. L. 97–35, title XXI, §2113(j), 95 Stat. 795, related to authorization for use of funds for administering professional review program, transfer of moneys between funds, and payments for Professional Standards Review Organizations. See section 1320c–8 of this title.

Section 1320c–18, act Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XI, §1169, as added Oct. 30, 1972, Pub. L. 92–603, title II, §249F(b), 86 Stat. 1444, related to technical assistance given to organizations desiring to be designated as Professional Standards Review Organizations.

Section 1320c–19, act Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XI, §1170, as added Oct. 30, 1972, Pub. L. 92–603, title II, §249F(b), 86 Stat. 1445, related to exemptions of Christian Science sanatoriums. See section 1320c–11 of this title.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# 05-19-15, Letter to Rep. Fred Upton et al. from Chairman Burns Providing April Monthly Status Report on the NRC Activities and Expenditures on the Nuclear Waste Fund

Accession Number: ML15119A205

Date Released: Wednesday, May 27, 2015

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML15119A196 - 05-19-15, Letter to Rep. Fred Upton, et al., from Chairman Burns submits the April Monthly Status Report on the NRC Activities and Expenditures of Unobligated Carryover Funds Appropriated from the Nuclear Waste Fund. (2 page(s), 5/19/2015)
    - ML15119A200 - 05-19-15, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Monthly Status Report Activities Related to Yucca Mountain Licensing Action for April 2015. (4 page(s), 5/19/2015)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### § 1502.39 Examination of record.

Except as provided in § 1502.3, documents in the record will be publicly available. Documents available for examination or copying will be placed on public display in the Office of the Secretary promptly upon receipt in that office.
### §12513. Study of program effectiveness

#### (a) In general

Not later than 12 months after April 21, 2009, the Comptroller General of the United States shall develop performance measures for each program receiving Federal assistance under the national service laws.

#### (b) Contents

The performance measures developed under subsection (a) shall—

(1) to the maximum extent practicable draw on research-based, quantitative data;

(2) take into account program purpose and program design;

(3) include criteria to evaluate the cost effectiveness of programs receiving assistance under the national service laws;

(4) include criteria to evaluate the administration and management of programs receiving Federal assistance under the national service laws; and

(5) include criteria to evaluate oversight and accountability of recipients of assistance through such programs under the national service laws.

#### (c) Report

Not later than 2 years after the development of the performance measures under subsection (a), and every 5 years thereafter, the Comptroller General of the United States shall prepare and submit to the authorizing committees and the Corporation's Board of Directors a report containing an assessment of each such program with respect to the performance measures developed under subsection (a).

#### (d) Definitions

In this section:

#### (1) In general

The terms "authorizing committees", "Corporation", and "national service laws" have the meanings given the terms in section 12511 of this title.

#### (2) Program

The term "program" means an entire program carried out by the Corporation under the national service laws, such as the entire AmeriCorps program carried out under subtitle C.1

(Pub. L. 111–13, title I, §1712, Apr. 21, 2009, 123 Stat. 1551.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Subtitle C, referred to in subsec. (d)(2), probably means subtitle C (§121 et seq.) of title I of Pub. L. 101–610, which is classified generally to division C (§12571 et seq.) of this subchapter. For complete classification of subtitle C to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Serve America Act, and not as part of the National and Community Service Act of 1990 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 2009, see section 6101(a) of Pub. L. 111–13, set out as an Effective Date of 2009 Amendment note under section 4950 of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Inergy Holdings, L.P. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, R. Brooks Sherman, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of Inergy Holdings, L.P., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ R. Brooks Sherman, Jr.R. Brooks Sherman, Jr.Chief Financial OfficerMay 8, 2008


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



39
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION**

**CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

I, C. William Hosler, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Catellus Development Corporation;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Catellus Development Corporation as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. Catellus Development Corporation’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Catellus Development Corporation and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that material information relating to Catellus Development Corporation, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of CatellusDevelopment Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change inCatellus Development Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during Catellus Development Corporation’s most recent fiscal quarter (Catellus Development Corporation’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case ofan annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Catellus Development Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. Catellus Development Corporation’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to Catellus Development Corporation’s auditors and the Audit Committee of Catellus Development Corporation’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect Catellus Development Corporation’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in Catellus Development Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 6, 2004
|         |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|---------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| • | the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|         |                                                                                                                                                      |
|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| • | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |
| Dated: | October 31, 2016 | By   | /s/ Thomas F. Motamed   |   |
|   |   |   | Thomas F. Motamed  |   |
|   |   |   | Chief Executive Officer  |   |
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with the quarterly report of ProUroCareMedical Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Richard C. Carlson, Chief Executive Officer of the Companycertify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| /s/ Richard C. Carlson  |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Richard C. Carlson      |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| November 20, 2006       |

 

----
#### KRUMM v. SOUTH DAKOTA CENT. RY. CO.

Evidence in an acton for the reasonable value of stone held to sustain the verdict for plaintiff.

(Opinion filed, May 24, 1910.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Rake County. Hon. Joseph W. Jones, Judge.

Action by Louis Krumm against the South Dakota Central Raihvay Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, and an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

*Joe Kirby,*for appellant.

*Krause*& *Krause,*for respondent.

McCOY, J.

This suit was instituted to recover the reasonable value of certain stone furnished to defendant 'by plaintiff. The onlv controversy was as to the quantity and value of the stone. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $150. The defendant appeals from the judgment and order denying a new trial, contending, under proper assignments of error, that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict. The defendant *470■claims to have kept no account or record of the quantity of stone taken from plaintiff’s premises. There is ample evidence to show that there was at least 50 cords of such stone. Plaintiff, the owner of said stone, testified that the same was worth from $3 to $3-5° Per cord. One Jensen testified that the fair market value of this stone was $3 per cord. There was some testimony tending to show that the stone was not worth to exceed $1 per cord. It was exclusively a question for the jury. The verdict is amply sustained by the evidence.

No error appearing in the record, the judgment and order denying a new trial are affirmed.
Exhibit
10.1


Indemnification
Agreement


The
Indemnification Agreement dated July 10, 2007 between Apex Silver Mines Limited
and Deborah Friedman, Senior Vice President and General Counsel of the Company,
is in the form of the Indemnification Agreement previously filed with the
Company’s Form 8-K dated March 15, 2007 which is incorporated by reference
hereto.
Springs & Playas in the Amargosa Area

Locations of natural springs and playas in the Amargosa area, within the 

Death Valley Regional Groundwater Flow System.

(Figure 2-5 in the Draft Supplement)

Modified from U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1711, 2010
§ 254.6 Deceptive use of diplomas, degrees, or certificates. ( a ) It is deceptive for an Industry Member to issue a degree, diploma, certificate of completion, or any similar document, that misrepresents, directly or indirectly, expressly or by implication, the subject matter, substance, or content of the course or program of instruction or any other material fact concerning the course or program of instruction for which it was awarded or the accomplishments of the student to whom it was awarded.
( b ) It is deceptive for an Industry Member to offer or confer an academic, professional, or occupational degree, if the award of such degree has not been Approved by the appropriate State educational agency or Accredited by a nationally recognized accrediting agency, unless it clearly and conspicuously discloses, in all advertising and promotional materials that contain a reference to such degree, that its award has not been Approved or Accredited by such an agency.
( c ) It is deceptive for an Industry Member to offer or confer a high school diploma unless the program of instruction to which it pertains is substantially equivalent to that offered by a resident secondary school, and unless the student is informed, by a clear and conspicuous disclosure in writing prior to enrollment, that the Industry Member cannot guarantee or otherwise control the recognition that will be accorded the diploma by institutions of higher education, other schools, or prospective employers, and that such recognition is a matter solely within the discretion of those entities.
[78 FR 68991, Nov. 18, 2013]