alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No: II-13-34 May 13, 2013

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416

NRC Schedules Open House to Discuss 

Annual Assessment of North Anna Power Station

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled an open house and poster session on 

Tuesday, May 21, to discuss the agency’s assessment of safety performance during 2012 at the North 

Anna nuclear power plant. The plant, operated by Dominion, is on Lake Anna about 40 miles northwest 

of Richmond. 

The meeting is scheduled for 5-7 p.m. at the Louisa County Administration Building, 1 

Woolfolk Ave., in Louisa, Va. There will be posters explaining the NRC’s role and the NRC staff will 

be available to answer questions on the safety performance of the North Anna plant last year.

“The NRC inspects nuclear plants and monitors their performance on an ongoing basis,” said 

NRC Region II Administrator Victor McCree. “We issue inspection reports throughout the year and we 

hold these annual meetings near each plant to discuss our oversight and answer any questions local 

residents may have.”

The NRC review concluded that North Anna operated in a manner that preserved public health 

and safety and protected the environment. 

A letter sent from the NRC Region II office to plant officials addresses the performance of the 

plant during 2012 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is publicly available on the 

NRC website.

This year, the NRC plans to continue to conduct the very detailed inspections required at those 

plants that are operating well. In addition, the agency will complete some generic inspections related to 

operator licensing examinations, emergency preparedness, fire protection and buried piping. 

Current performance information for both North Anna Unit 1 and Unit 2 is available on the 

NRC website.
#### § 1500.5 Hazardous mixtures.

For a mixture of substances, the determination of whether the mixture is a “hazardous substance” as defined by section 2(f) of the act (repeated in § 1500.3(b)(4)) should be based on the physical, chemical, and pharmacological characteristics of the mixture. A mixture of substances may therefore be less hazardous or more hazardous than its components because of synergistic or antagonistic reactions. It may not be possible to reach a fully satisfactory decision concerning the toxic, irritant, corrosive, flammable, sensitizing, or pressure-generating properties of a substance from what is known about its components or ingredients. The mixture itself should be tested.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3409 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3409

   To limit the authority of the Secretary of the Interior to issue 
regulations before December 31, 2013, under the Surface Mining Control 
                      and Reclamation Act of 1977.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 14, 2011

 Mr. Johnson of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To limit the authority of the Secretary of the Interior to issue 
regulations before December 31, 2013, under the Surface Mining Control 
                      and Reclamation Act of 1977.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Coal Miner Employment and Domestic 
Energy Infrastructure Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON AUTHORITY TO ISSUE REGULATIONS UNDER THE SURFACE 
              MINING CONTROL AND RECLAMATION ACT OF 1977.

    The Secretary of the Interior may not, before December 31, 2013, 
issue or approve any proposed or final regulation under the Surface 
Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.) 
that would--
            (1) adversely impact employment in coal mines in the United 
        States;
            (2) cause a reduction in revenue received by the Federal 
        Government or any State, tribal, or local government, by 
        reducing through regulation the amount of coal in the United 
        States that is available for mining;
            (3) reduce the amount of coal available for domestic 
        consumption or for export;
            (4) designate any area as unsuitable for surface coal 
        mining and reclamation operations; or
            (5) expose the United States to liability for taking the 
        value of privately owned coal through regulation.
                                 <all>
```
### **CHAPTER 44—DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT**

Sec.
3531.
Congressional declaration of purpose.
3532.
Establishment of Department.
3533.
Officers of Department.
3533a.
Transferred.
3534.
Transfer of functions.
3535.
Administrative provisions.
3535a.
Working capital fund.
3536.
Annual reports.
3536a.
Report on interagency family economic empowerment strategies.
3537.
Separability.
3537a.
Prohibition of advance disclosure of funding decisions.
3537b.
Repealed.
3537c.
Prohibition of lump-sum payments.
3538.
Rescheduling and refinancing of Federal loans.
3539.
Housing and Urban Development Disaster Assistance Fund.
3539a.
Department of Housing and Urban Development Nonrecurring Expenses Fund.
3540.
Repealed.
3541.
Paperwork reduction.
3542.
Public notice and comment regarding demonstration programs not expressly authorized in law.
3543.
Preventing fraud and abuse in Department of Housing and Urban Development programs.
3544.
Preventing fraud and abuse in housing and urban development programs.
3545.
HUD accountability.
3545a.
Notification of issuance of electronic notice of availability of assistance or funding to be competitively awarded for certain programs or discretionary funds.
3546.
Use of domestic products.
3547.
Special projects.
3548.
Semiannual report on contracts and task orders.
3549.
Investigation of violations.
3550.
Audit of Department financial statements.
### §11136. Disclosure and correction of information

With respect to the information reported to the Secretary (or the agency designated under section 11134(b) of this title) under this subchapter respecting a physician or other licensed health care practitioner, the Secretary shall, by regulation, provide for—

(1) disclosure of the information, upon request, to the physician or practitioner, and

(2) procedures in the case of disputed accuracy of the information.

(Pub. L. 99–660, title IV, §426, Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3791.)
### Part K—Fission for the Future
§ 1406.1 Scope, purpose, and effective date. ( a ) *Scope.* This part 1406 requires manufacturers, including importers, of coal and wood burning appliances, as defined in § 1406.3(a), to provide consumers with a specified notification concerning the installation, operation, and maintenance of the appliances. The notification is intended to provide consumers with technical and performance information related to the safety of the appliances. This part 1406 also requires these manufacturers to provide to the Commission a copy of the notification to consumers and a statement of the reasons supporting the manufacturer's conclusion that certain clearance distances contained in the notification are appropriate for preventing fires.
( b ) *Purpose.* This regulation is intended to reduce the unreasonable risk of injury from fire associated with inadequate information provided with coal and wood burning appliances. This rule does not replace any voluntary standards applicable to these appliances or any state or local requirements applicable to the installation, use, or maintenance of such appliances that are not inconsistent with this rule. Thus, for example, a local code could require the actual installation of appliances at different distances from combustibles than those specified on the label required by this rule, and voluntary standards or local codes could require labeling or instructions in addition to those required by this rule. The fact that a product complies with this regulation is not intended to be a substitute for the performance tests and other criteria established by listing organizations whose approval is required to meet some state or local requirements applicable to these appliances.
( c ) *Effective date.* ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraphs (c)(2) and (c)(3) of this section, manufacturers, including importers, of coal and wood burning appliances as defined in § 1406.3(a) must comply with this regulation with respect to stoves that are manufactured or imported after October 17, 1983, or that are first introduced into United States commerce after May 16, 1984, regardless of the date of manufacture. For the purposes of this rule, an appliance is manufactured when no further assembly of the appliance is required (i) before shipment by the manufacturer or (ii), if the product is not so shipped, before delivery to the first purchaser. A product manufactured in the United States (U.S.) is first introduced into U.S. commerce when it is shipped by the manufacturer or delivered to the next purchaser, whichever comes first. A product manufactured outside the U.S. is first introduced into U.S. commerce when it is first brought within a U.S. port of entry.
( 2 ) The requirements of § 1406.4(c) apply to sales catalogs and point of sale literature provided by manufacturers after May 16, 1984.
( 3 ) Section 1406.5 is effective December 6, 1983.
(Information collection requirements contained in paragraph (a) were approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 3041-0040) [48 FR 21914, May 16, 1983; 48 FR 26761, June 10, 1983, as amended at 48 FR 50706, Nov. 3, 1983; 48 FR 52889, Nov. 23, 1983]
#### Nacional Financiera, S.A., v. Banco de Ponce et al.

Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 832.]
### §10139. Judicial review of agency actions

#### (a) Jurisdiction of United States courts of appeals

(1) Except for review in the Supreme Court of the United States, the United States courts of appeals shall have original and exclusive jurisdiction over any civil action—

(A) for review of any final decision or action of the Secretary, the President, or the Commission under this part;

(B) alleging the failure of the Secretary, the President, or the Commission to make any decision, or take any action, required under this part;

(C) challenging the constitutionality of any decision made, or action taken, under any provision of this part;

(D) for review of any environmental impact statement prepared pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) with respect to any action under this part, or as required under section 10155(c)(1) of this title, or alleging a failure to prepare such statement with respect to any such action;

(E) for review of any environmental assessment prepared under section 10132(b)(1) or 10155(c)(2) of this title; or

(F) for review of any research and development activity under subchapter II.

(2) The venue of any proceeding under this section shall be in the judicial circuit in which the petitioner involved resides or has its principal office, or in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

#### (c) 1 Deadline for commencing action

A civil action for judicial review described under subsection (a)(1) may be brought not later than the 180th day after the date of the decision or action or failure to act involved, as the case may be, except that if a party shows that he did not know of the decision or action complained of (or of the failure to act), and that a reasonable person acting under the circumstances would not have known, such party may bring a civil action not later than the 180th day after the date such party acquired actual or constructive knowledge of such decision, action, or failure to act.

(Pub. L. 97–425, title I, §119, Jan. 7, 1983, 96 Stat. 2227.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, referred to in subsec. (a)(1)(D), is Pub. L. 91–190, Jan. 1, 1970, 83 Stat. 852, which is classified generally to chapter 55 (§4321 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4321 of this title and Tables.

1 So in original. No subsec. (b) has been enacted.
#### In the Matter of Rose Yasser, Respondent, against Joseph D. McGoldrick, as State Rent Administrator, Appellant.

An application by the landlord for a certificate of eviction to obtain possession of petitioner’s apartment for the landlord’s daughter and her husband and two infant children, was denied by the State Rent Administrator on the ground that the landlord was not acting in good faith but in retaliation against petitioner because of disputes and litigation between them. The daughter and her family occupied a three-room apartment with but one bedroom. An article 78 proceeding brought by the landlord to review the administrator’s determination terminated in an order, made at the administrator’s request and with the landlord’s consent, remitting the *1057matter to the administrator “ for further consideration ”. Thereafter, a new conference was held before the rent commission, at which the landlord and tenant appeared with counsel, and substantially the same" evidence was adduced as had previously been presented to the commission. The administrator, however, reversed his prior determination and directed the issuance of a certificate of eviction. The instant proceeding was then instituted by the, tenant to review that determination and resulted in an order vacating the administrator’s order and denying the certificate of eviction, the court holding in substance that the administrator was without power to reverse himself, on the same proof, in the absence of fraud, illegality or irregularity in vital matters. Order reversed on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and petition dismissed, without costs. The State Rent Administrator had the authority to reconsider the matter *de novo,*on the remission by the Supreme Court (cf. *Matter of Schoenstein*v. *McGoldrick,*279 App. Div. 395 and *Matter of Grodofsky*v. *McGoldrick,*279 App. Div. 914, affd. 304 N. Y. 710); and his final determination that the landlord sought in good faith to recover possession of the housing accommodations because of immediate and compelling necessity was warranted by substantial evidence. (Cf. *Matter of Simon*v. *McGoldrick,*279 App. Div. 760; *Matter of Natalicchio*v. *McGoldrick,*279 App. Div. 796, affd. 304 N. Y. 931, and *Matter of Amutulla*v. *McGoldrick,*280 App. Div. 36.) Nolan, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, MacCrate and Beldoch, JJ., concur.
### SUBCHAPTER VI—COORDINATION OF FEDERAL ENERGY CONSERVATION FACTORS AND DATA

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This subchapter was enacted as part of the Energy Security Act, and not as part of the National Energy Conservation Policy Act which comprises this chapter.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2374

To amend the Small Business Act to allow more joint ventures, leaderfollower arrangements, and teaming arrangements under the section 8(a) 

minority business development program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 5, 2003

Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Small Business 

A BILL

To amend the Small Business Act to allow more joint ventures, leader-follower arrangements, and teaming arrangements under the section 8(a) minority business development program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL JOINT VENTURES, ETC., ALLOWED 

4 UNDER SMALL DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS 

5 DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM. 

6 Subparagraph (H) of section 7(j)(13) of the Small 

7 Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(j)(13)) is amended to read 

8 as follows: 
2

•HR 2374 IH 

1 ‘‘(H) Joint ventures, leader-follower ar2 rangements, and teaming agreements between 

3 the Program Participant and other Program 

4 Participants and other small business concerns 

5 with respect to any contracting opportunity. 

6 Such activities shall be undertaken on the basis 

7 of programs developed by the agency respon8 sible for the procurement, with the assistance of 

9 the Administration.’’.

Æ
**CL** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 2 - 0 659 STATE OF MONTANA ,

Plaintiff and Appellee , v. MICHAEL PAINTER ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including December 13 , 202 3 , within which to prepare, file, and serve the State’s response brief

.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 2 2023

11/02/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0659
#### § 995.12 Certification designation.

An Applicant that has been certified by NOAA as a CED may use the phrase “Certified NOAA ENC Distributor” on products and marketing materials. An Applicant that has been certified by NOAA as a CEVAD may use the phrase “Certified NOAA ENC Value Added Distributor” on products and marketing materials. Use of these phrases must include labeling to identify the product's contents and suitable use. (See § 995.24(a)(4), (5) and (6) and (b)(3), (4) and (5)). Use of the NOAA emblem is described in § 995.28 and is not automatically granted with certification.
#### Peter F. Lynch, Respondent, v. George D. Bailey et al., Doing Business as Touche, Niven, Bailey & Smart, Appellants.

Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Callahan, J., dissents and votes to reverse and deny the motion in the following memorandum: In the prior action, the plaintiff sought an injunction as well as declaratory judgment and he might have secured damages in that suit and the judgment is, therefore, *res judicata.*[See *post,*p. 789.]
### SUBCHAPTER III—GRANTS TO STATES FOR UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION
April 16, 2015 

MEMORANDUM TO: Mark A. Satorius 

 Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS – SECY-14-0112 – 

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR A PATH FORWARD FOR 

CHEMICAL SECURITY 

The staff’s recommendation to proceed with Option 4 to maintain awareness of chemical 

inventories and the adequacy of security measures at fuel cycle facilities is not approved. 

The staff should maintain awareness of changes in the Department of Homeland Security 

(DHS) Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) listing of chemicals of interest and 

should identify a mechanism (i.e., Information Notice) to inform relevant licensees of changes to 

the DHS CFATS list of chemicals of interest. 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA 

 OPA 

 Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR
#### In the Matter of Nerwal Realty Corp., Respondent-Appellant, against William E. Boyland et al., Constituting the Tax Commission of the City of New York, Appellants-Respondents. [360-370 9th Ave. and 358-372 W. 31st St., Borough of Manhattan.]

No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT DANIEL BRIAN HARGROVE, Petitioner

v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING, Respondent : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 87 WAL 2015 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 30th day of June, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL
                          EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bekem Metals, Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Marat
Cherdabayev, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

Date: August 14, 2006                                 /s/ Marat Cherdabayev     
                                                     Marat Cherdabayev,
                                                     Principal Executive Officer
```
### §11342. Retention of interest earned

Interest accrued on the balance of any grant to the National Board shall be available to the National Board for reallocation, and total administrative costs shall be determined based on total amount of funds available, including interest and any private contributions that are made to the National Board.

(Pub. L. 100–77, title III, §312, July 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 492.)
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jefferson Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|             |  |                       |  |                                                        
|------------ |  | --------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|May 10, 2006 |  | /s/ Anderson L. Smith
|             |  |                       |  | Anderson L. Smith President and Chief Executive Officer



|             |  |                    |  |                                                                
|------------ |  | ------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|May 10, 2006 |  | /s/ Jane P. Hutton
|             |  |                    |  | Jane P. Hutton Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
### Part E—Special Work and Career Development Programs
#### § 1115.24 Applicability.

This subpart applies to manufacturers (including importers), retailers, and distributors of consumer products as those terms are defined herein and in the CPSA.
### subpart b—elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation forensic centers