alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jefferson Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |                                                 
|----------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|February 11, 2008 |  | /s/ Anderson L. Smith                           
|                  |  | Anderson L. Smith                               
|                  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer           
|                  | 
|February 11, 2008 |  | /s/ Jane P. Hutton                              
|                  |  | Jane P. Hutton                                  
|                  |  | Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
#### Adroit Metal Products, Inc., et al., Respondents, *v.*Young's Windows of America, Inc., et al., Appellants.

*Per Curiam.*

In this action for a declaratory judgment, defendants appeal from an order of Special Term denying their motion to dismiss the complaint. On another appeal between the same parties decided herewith *(post,*p. 581) this court unanimously affirms a prior order of Special Term denying plaintiffs’ motion to stay arbitration and granting defendants’ cross motion to stay this action.

The contract in question coneededly contained a broad arbitration clause submitting *“*any ” controversy to arbitration. Plaintiffs do not allege that the contract was procured by fraud or duress nor do they ask that it be rescinded or annulled but only that certain paragraphs be declared void and unenforcible including the arbitration clause. On the facts and circumstances of this case, all issues in the controversy between the parties including the validity, application or limitation of the covenants in question, are for the arbitrators who may if they deem it proper decide such issues either in plaintiffs’ or defendants’ favor. On the coming in of the award the parties will have opportunity to raise any question as to its scope and enforcement. The court in its discretion should not take jurisdiction of this action for declaratory judgment as other forms of relief are available for adjudication of plaintiffs’ claims.

The order appealed from denying defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements to defendants-appellants, and the motion granted.

Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Shientag, JJ., concur.

*581Order unanimously reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements to the appellants and the motion granted, and judgment is directed to be entered dismissing the complaint herein, with costs.
### §10173. Benefits agreements

#### (a) In general

(1) The Secretary may enter into a benefits agreement with the State of Nevada concerning a repository or with a State or an Indian tribe concerning a monitored retrievable storage facility for the acceptance of high-level radioactive waste or spent nuclear fuel in that State or on the reservation of that tribe, as appropriate.

(2) The State or Indian tribe may enter into such an agreement only if the State Attorney General or the appropriate governing authority of the Indian tribe or the Secretary of the Interior, in the absence of an appropriate governing authority, as appropriate, certifies to the satisfaction of the Secretary that the laws of the State or Indian tribe provide adequate authority for that entity to enter into the benefits agreement.

(3) Any benefits agreement with a State under this section shall be negotiated in consultation with affected units of local government in such State.

(4) Benefits and payments under this part may be made available only in accordance with a benefits agreement under this section.

#### (b) Amendment

A benefits agreement entered into under subsection (a) may be amended only by the mutual consent of the parties to the agreement and terminated only in accordance with section 10173c of this title.

#### (c) Agreement with Nevada

The Secretary shall offer to enter into a benefits agreement with the Governor of Nevada. Any benefits agreement with a State under this subsection shall be negotiated in consultation with any affected units of local government in such State.

#### (d) Monitored retrievable storage

The Secretary shall offer to enter into a benefits agreement relating to a monitored retrievable storage facility with the governing body of the Indian tribe on whose reservation the site for such facility is located, or, if the site is not located on a reservation, with the Governor of the State in which the site is located and in consultation with affected units of local government in such State.

#### (e) Limitation

Only one benefits agreement for a repository and only one benefits agreement for a monitored retrievable storage facility may be in effect at any one time.

#### (f) Judicial review

Decisions of the Secretary under this section are not subject to judicial review.

(Pub. L. 97–425, title I, §170, as added Pub. L. 100–202, §101(d) [title III, §300], Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1329–104, 1329–121; Pub. L. 100–203, title V, §5031, Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–237.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 100–202 and Pub. L. 100–203 added identical sections.
----

**EXHIBIT        32.2**

**CERTIFICATION        OF**

**CHIEF        EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT        TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| (1) | the                  Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter                  ended June                  30, 2006 as filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange                  Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements                  of Section                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                  and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                  August  14,                  2006 |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                               |   |
|                                                               |   |
| /s/                  Ted T.H. Jeong                                |   |
| Ted                  T.H. Jeong                                    |   |
| Chief                  Financial Officer                           |   |

----
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of ACRO Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Asaf Porat, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to our knowledge, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |     |                                                               | 
|----------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Dated:  August 23, 2012 | By: | /s/ Asaf Porat                                                | 
|                        |     | Asaf Porat                                                    | 
|                        |     | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, Chief Financial Officer | 
|                        |     |                                                               | 
|                        |     |                                                               | 
|                        |     |                                                              
|                        |     |                                                               | 
|                        |     |                                                               | 
|                        |     |                                                               | 
|                        |     |                                                               |
|                                                        |
|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                        |  |
| Name of Subsidiary                                     | Organized Under Laws of |
| American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania     | Pennsylvania |
| CNA Insurance Company Limited                          | United Kingdom |
| Columbia Casualty Company                              | Illinois |
| Continental Assurance Company                          | Illinois |
| Continental Casualty Company                           | Illinois |
| Continental Reinsurance Corporation International, Ltd | Bermuda |
| Hardy Guernsey Limited                                 | Guernsey |
| National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford            | Illinois |
| North Rock Insurance Company Limited                   | Bermuda |
| Surety Bonding Company of America                      | South Dakota |
| The Continental Corporation                            | New York |
| The Continental Insurance Company                      | Pennsylvania |
| The Continental Insurance Company of New Jersey        | New Jersey |
| Transportation Insurance Company                       | Illinois |
| Universal Surety of America                            | South Dakota |
| Valley Forge Insurance Company                         | Pennsylvania |
| Western Surety Company                                 | South Dakota |
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206

File Name: 06a0394p.06

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________

PAUL GREGORY HOUSE,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

RICKY BELL, Warden,

Respondent-Appellee.

X

-

-

-

-

>

,

-

-

N

No. 00-6136

Filed: October 25, 2006 

_________________

ORDER _________________

This appeal is now before us on remand from the Supreme Court, House v. Bell, 126 S. Ct.

2064 (2006). In light of the Court’s opinion (and the Tennessee attorney general’s statement in

respondent’s brief before the Supreme Court that unexhausted issues remain under Tenn. Code. Ann.

§ 40-30-117(a)(2)(4)), we ask that the parties submit letter briefs addressing whether remand to the

courts of Tennessee is appropriate in order to allow petitioner to exhaust his state-court remedies

on his actual innocence claim.

Letter briefs shall be due within sixty days of this order and shall not exceed fifteen pages.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 /s/ Leonard Green

___________________________________ Clerk

1
§ 1031.8 Voluntary Standards Coordinator. ( a ) The Executive Director shall appoint a Voluntary Standards Coordinator to coordinate agency participation in voluntary standards bodies so that: ( 1 ) The most effective use is made of agency personnel and resources, and
( 2 ) The views expressed by such personnel are in the public interest and, at a minimum, do not conflict with the interests and established views of the agency.
( b ) The Voluntary Standards Coordinator is responsible for managing the Commission's voluntary standards program, as well as preparing and submitting to the Commission a semiannual summary of staff's voluntary standards activities. The summary shall set forth, among other things, the goals of each voluntary standard under development, the extent of CPSC staff activity, the current status of standards development and implementation, and, if any, recommendations for additional Commission action. The Voluntary Standards Coordinator shall also compile information on the Commission's voluntary standards activities for the Commission's annual report.
#### § 1309.3 Banned hazardous product.

Any crib bumper, as defined in section 1309.2, regardless of the date of manufacture, is a banned hazardous product under section 8 of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2057).
INFORMATION REPORT

October 31, 2013 SECY-13-0115

For: The Commissioners 

From: Reginald W. Mitchell

 Assistant for Operations 

 Office of the Executive Director for Operations 

Subject: WEEKLY INFORMATION REPORT - WEEK ENDING 

 OCTOBER 18, 2013 

Contents Enclosure

Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer A 

Office of the Secretary B 

 

 Reginald W. Mitchell /RA/

 Assistant for Operations, OEDO 

Contact: 

L. Rakovan, OEDO 
October 31, 2013 SECY-13-0115

For: The Commissioners 

From: Reginald W. Mitchell

 Assistant for Operations 

 Office of the Executive Director for Operations 

Subject: WEEKLY INFORMATION REPORT - WEEK ENDING 

 OCTOBER 18, 2013 

Contents Enclosure

Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer A 

Office of the Secretary B 

 

 

 Reginald W. Mitchell /RA/

 Assistant for Operations, OEDO 

Contact: 

L. Rakovan, OEDO 

DISTRIBUTION: 

EDO R/F AO R/F 

ADAMS Accession No: ML13304A910

OFFICE OEDO AO/OEDO 

NAME LRakovan 

 

RMitchell 

DATE 10/31/13 10/31/13 

 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
OCTOBER 18, 2013 ENCLOSURE A

Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer (OCHCO) 

Items of Interest 

Week Ending October 18, 2013 

Arrivals

KEENE, JAMES PROJECT MANAGER NRR

SHEA, JOHN IT PROJECT MANAGER NRO

Retirements

None 

Departures

None 
OCTOBER 18, 2013 ENCLOSURE B

Office of the Secretary (SECY) 

 Items of Interest 

 Week Ending October 18, 2013 

Document Released

to Public

Date Subject

Information Papers

1. SECY-13-0102 9/27/13 Annual Review of the Lessons-Learned 

Program

Commission Correspondence

1. Letter to Senator Thomas R. Carper, et al., dated October 9, 2013, responds to his letter 

requesting an update on NRC actions relating to 10 CFR Part 72 based on Petition for 

Rulemaking (PRM 72-7) relating to spent fuel from storage pools.
### §1006. Applications and furnishing of information

#### (a) In general

The Commissioner of Social Security shall, subject to subsection (b), prescribe such requirements with respect to the filing of applications, the furnishing of information and other material, and the reporting of events and changes in circumstances, as may be necessary for the effective and efficient administration of this subchapter.

#### (b) Verification requirement

The requirements prescribed by the Commissioner of Social Security under subsection (a) shall preclude any determination of entitlement to benefits under this subchapter solely on the basis of declarations by the individual concerning qualifications or other material facts, and shall provide for verification of material information from independent or collateral sources, and the procurement of additional information as necessary in order to ensure that the benefits are provided only to qualified individuals (or their representative payees) in correct amounts.

(Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title VIII, §806, as added Pub. L. 106–169, title II, §251(a), Dec. 14, 1999, 113 Stat. 1846.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

For prior provisions, see note set out under section 1001 of this title.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
MediciNova, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Yuichi Iwaki, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



Date: May 15, 2009By:

/s/    YUICHI
IWAKIYuichi Iwaki, M.D., Ph.D. President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and such certification is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF
TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE In connection with the Annual Report of Stratos International, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended April 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David
A. Slack, Senior Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)) and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. July 29, 2004 /s/ David A. SlackDavid A. SlackSenior Vice President  Finance
and Chief Financial Officer
#### § 1000.28 Directorate for Economic Analysis.

The Directorate for Economic Analysis, which is managed by the Associate Executive Director for Economic Analysis, is responsible for providing the Commission with advice and information on economic and environmental matters and on the economic, social and environmental effects of Commission actions. It analyzes the potential effects of CPSC actions on consumers and on industries, including effects on competitive structure and commercial practices. The Directorate acquires, compiles, and maintains economic data on movements and trends in the general economy and on the production, distribution, and sales of consumer products and their components to assist in the analysis of CPSC priorities, policies, actions, and rules. It plans and carries out economic surveys of consumers and industries. It studies the costs of accidents and injuries. It evaluates the economic, societal, and environmental impact of product safety rules and standards. It performs regulatory analyses and studies of costs and benefits of CPSC actions as required by the Consumer Product Safety Act, The National Environmental Policy Act, the Regulatory Flexibility Act and other Acts, and by policies established by the Consumer Product Safety Commission. The Directorate manages hazard assessment and reduction projects as assigned.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-13-0093 - Reprocessing Regulatory Framework - Status and Next Steps

Accession Number: ML13178A233

Date Released: Monday, October 28, 2013

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML13178A243 - SECY-13-0093 - Reprocessing Regulatory Framework - Status and Next Steps  (WITS 2012200148) (5 page(s), 7/1/2013)
    - ML13178A259 - SECY-13-0093 - REPROCESSING REGULATORY FRAMEWORK - STATUS AND NEXT STEPS Enclosure 1 - STAFF RESPONSES TO COMMISSION'S QUESTIONS IN SRM-SECY-11-0163 (WITS 201200148) (7 page(s), 7/1/2013)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
No:I-13-030 August 22, 2013

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330

 Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331

NRC Public Meeting Aug. 28 to Receive Comments

on Decommissioning Activities Report for TMI-2

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a public meeting Aug. 28 in Hershey, Pa., to 

discuss the Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report for Three Mile Island, Unit 2. The public 

will also be able to make comments.

TMI-2 is a pressurized water reactor located in Londonderry Township, Pa. It has been 

permanently shut down since the accident at the facility on March 28, 1979. GPU Nuclear defueled the 

reactor vessel and decontaminated the facility and the plant is in a safe, stable condition known as postdefueling monitored storage. The formal transition of TMI-2 from post-accident cleanup to monitored 

storage required NRC approval, which was granted in 1993. 

The meeting will be held from 7-9 p.m. in the Cocoa Terrace at Hershey Lodge, 325 University 

Drive, Hershey, Pa. The company submitted the Post Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report on 

June 28, 2013.

Written comments on the decommissioning report can be submitted using Docket ID NRC-2013-

0183 on the Regulations.gov website. Comments can also be submitted, using the Docket ID, via mail to: 

Cindy Bladey, Chief, Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch, Office of Administration, Mail Stop: 

3WFN-06-A44M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555.

The deadline for submitting comments on the report is Sept. 27.