alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No: II-13-058 September 23, 2013

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416 

NRC to Increase Oversight of Robinson Nuclear Power Plant

The H.B. Robinson nuclear power plant will receive additional oversight, including a follow-up 

inspection, from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission after a violation related to the company’s failure to 

perform adequate preventive maintenance on the dedicated shutdown diesel generator.

The Robinson plant is located near Hartsville, S.C., about 26 miles northwest of Florence, and is 

operated by Duke Energy.

The violation and increased oversight is linked to an inspection finding, which was discussed at 

a regulatory conference between Duke and the NRC in August. After reviewing the information from 

the inspection and the conference, the NRC staff determined that the finding was a violation and should 

be classified as white, meaning it has low to moderate safety significance. 

The issue was identified after the failure of the diesel’s radiator fan belts and the subsequent 

automatic shutdown of the generator in October 2012. There was no actual event requiring the use of that 

diesel generator and it was repaired and returned to service. However, the fan belts were degraded, in part, 

because of inadequate inspection, maintenance and periodic replacement. The belt failures could have 

prevented the shutdown diesel generator from being available during a loss of power or a fire.

“Overall, the Robinson plant continues to be operated safely,” said NRC Region II 

Administrator Victor McCree. “However, the additional oversight and inspection by the NRC is 

warranted because we expect plants to ensure that all important equipment is properly inspected and 

maintained.” 

The additional NRC inspection will provide assurance that the causes of the issue are 

understood and corrective actions are sufficient to prevent recurrence. The additional inspection has not 

yet been scheduled.

The NRC evaluates inspection findings and performance indicators at commercial nuclear 

power plants with a color-coded system which classifies them as green, white, yellow or red, in 

increasing order of safety significance. As the significance increases, the NRC heightens the level of 

oversight for that plant. If a plant takes appropriate corrective actions and improves safety performance, 

the agency returns to its normal, but still extensive, inspection schedule. 

The NRC previously issued an inspection report that provides additional details.
Page | 2
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marco Community Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Thomas M. Whelan, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |     |  |                                                                    
|----------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 5, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Thomas M. Whelan                                               
|                  |  |     |  | Thomas M. Whelan, Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
P.1 

rITfr> •>-'--*-~»-l-:---*v*-*vi-* I-?*-! i'-'-fffi'tTT--"-•"•-""•• 

. „„ ._^^^vv---^^^Wt^M**«_ ^ 

U _ - . : C T -A «.30.198 6 12:5 8 P. 2 

U.S. Deportment 

of Transportation 

United States 

Coast Guard 

Commandant 

Unite. Slates Coast Guard 

Washington. OC 20593 

Stan Symbol; 

Pnone: G-TGC-2 

(202) 426-2675 

SEP 2 | 1986 

. 

/o/(to) ^?£-S-2o 

Union Carbide Corporation 

Attn: D. L. Bruker 

P.O. Box 50 

Hahnville, LA 70057 

Dear Sir: 

Your letter of September 18, 1986 does not constitute a report as 

required by 40 CFR 302.6. The rule states: 

Notification requirements. 

(a) Any person in charge of a vessel or an offshore or an 

onshore facility shall, as soon as he has knowledge of any 

release (other than a federally permitted release or an 

application of a pesticide) of a hazardous substance from such 

vessel or facility in a quantity equal to or exceeding the 

reportable quantity "determined by this part in any 24-hour 

period immediately notify the National Response Center [(800) 

424-8802; in Washington D.C. (202) 426-2675]. 

(b) Releases of mixtures and solutions are subject to these 

notification requirements only where component hazardous 

substance of the mixture or solution is released in a quantity 

equal to or greater than its reportable Quantity. 

The preamble to this rule published in the Federal Register, Volume 

50, Number 65 of April 4, 1985 further defined this requirement as 

follows: "Reporting of releases pursuant to CERCLA section 103 (a) 

and (b) is to be made by telephone to the National Response Center**. 

You may contact the National Response Center at 1-800-424-8802 or 

(202) 426-2675 at anytime to report this incident. 

For amplification of reporting requirements for continual releases 

vou may contact the regional level of the Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

Environmental Protection Agency Region VI 

1201 Elm Street 

Dallas, TX 75270 

Telephone: (214) 767-2600 
P.2 

»86 13'00 P- 3 

FR0.1 JC; T...

 T '•" 

Any au-stlons eonoernlng proposed regulations Roverning cjntinous 

releases should be directed to : 

Barbara Hostage 

Mail Code WH-548B 

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 

401 M ST., S.W. 

Washington DC 20460 

\ 

Since 

K. A. ROCK 

Commander, U.S. Coast Guard 

Chief. National Response Center
§ 1.97 Amount of penalty. All penalties assessed under this subchapter shall be in the amount per violation as described in section 333(a) of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, 42 U.S.C. 6303(a), adjusted for inflation pursuant to § 1.98, unless the Commission otherwise directs. In considering the amount of penalty, the Commission shall take into account: ( a ) Respondent's size and ability to pay;
( b ) Respondent's good faith;
( c ) Any history of previous violations;
( d ) The deterrent effect of the penalty action;
( e ) The length of time involved before the Commission was made aware of the violation;
( f ) The gravity of the violation, including the amount of harm to consumers and the public caused by the violation; and
( g ) Such other matters as justice may require.
[32 FR 8444, June 13, 1967, as amended at 61 FR 54548, Oct. 21, 1996]
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Medical International Technology, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michel Bayouk, Secretary and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|   

|\s\
|---

|Michel Bayouk
|-------------

|Michel BayoukSecretary and Principal Accounting OfficerSeptember 23, 2005
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
### **CHAPTER 56—ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY IMPROVEMENT**

Sec.
4371.
Congressional findings, declarations, and purposes.
4372.
Office of Environmental Quality.
4373.
Referral of Environmental Quality Reports to standing committees having jurisdiction.
4374.
Authorization of appropriations.
4375.
Office of Environmental Quality Management Fund.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trump Casino Holdings, L.L.C., and Trump Casino Funding, Inc. (the Companies) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald J. Trump, the Chief Executive Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                   
|/s/ Donald J. Trump                                                                
|Donald J. Trump                                                                    
|Chief Executive Officer of Trump Casino Holdings, L.L.C. Trump Casino Funding, Inc.



August 16, 2004
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 19

- 00597

- CV

Crystal Elizabeth De La Torre, Appellant

v.

Armando De La Torre, Jr., Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COUR T AT LAW NO. 3 OF WI LLIAMSON COUNTY NO. 18

- 3333

- FC3, THE HONORABLE DOUG ARNO LD, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s brief on appeal was originally due on Nove mber 14, 2019.

Appellant’s counsel has now filed a n opposed motion for extension of time , requesting that the

Court extend the time for filing appellant’s br ief in this accelerated appeal by 60 days

. We grant

the motion for extension of time and order appellant to file a brief no later than January 13, 20 20.

No further extens ion of time will be granted and failure to comply with this order may result in

dism issal of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a).

It is ordered on November 27, 2019

.

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Triana and Smith
§ 1502.44 Review by the courts. ( a ) The Commission's final decision constitutes final agency action from which a participant may petition for judicial review under the statutes governing the matter involved. Before requesting an order from a court for a stay of the Commission's action pending judicial review, a participant shall first submit a petition for a stay of action under § 1502.43.
( b ) Under 28 U.S.C. 2112(a), CPSC will request consolidation of all petitions related to a particular matter.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
[MULTIPLIER]                                     1,000
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         175,381
<SECURITIES>                                    14,876
<RECEIVABLES>                                   96,067
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,311
<INVENTORY>                                    267,543
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               567,573
<PP&E>                                         800,204
<DEPRECIATION>                                 225,838
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,205,105
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          333,830
<BONDS>                                        582,394
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     230,847
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,205,105
<SALES>                                      1,796,526
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,805,924
<CGS>                                        1,483,800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,702,075
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,260
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,981
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,396)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       181
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,577)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,577)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No: 15-005 January 29, 2015

CONTACT: Dave McIntyre, 301-415-8200 

NRC Publishes Final Two Volumes of Yucca Mountain Safety Evaluation 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has published volumes two and five of its safety 

evaluation report on the geologic high-level nuclear waste repository proposed for Yucca Mountain in 

Nevada. 

Publication of these volumes completes the technical safety review of the Department of 

Energy’s Yucca Mountain application. The safety evaluation report includes the staff’s 

recommendation that the Commission should not authorize construction of the repository because DOE

has not met certain land and water rights requirements identified in Volume 4, published in December, 

and a supplement to DOE’s environmental impact statement has not yet been completed.

Volume 2 covers repository safety before permanent closure. It contains the staff’s conclusion 

that with reasonable assurance, subject to proposed conditions, DOE’s application meets the NRC’s 

regulatory requirements in that area. Volume 5 covers proposed conditions on the construction 

authorization, probable subjects of license specifications, and the staff’s overall conclusions.

Completion of the safety evaluation report does not represent an agency decision on whether to 

authorize construction. A final licensing decision, should funds beyond those currently available be 

appropriated, could come only after completion of a supplement to the Department of Energy’s 

environmental impact statement, hearings on contentions in the adjudication, and Commission review.

DOE submitted its Yucca Mountain application in June 2008. The NRC staff published Volume 

1 (General Information) of the safety evaluation report in August 2010. After DOE moved to withdraw 

the application and Congress stopped appropriating funds for the NRC’s review, the agency closed out 

its application review and published three technical evaluation reports containing the staff’s technical 

analyses to that point but no regulatory conclusions. The adjudication of nearly 300 contentions filed by 

various parties contesting the application was also suspended in September 2011.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ordered the NRC in August 

2013 to resume the licensing process using currently available funding appropriated from the Nuclear 

Waste Fund. The NRC subsequently published Volume 3 (Repository Safety After Permanent Closure) 

on Oct. 16, 2014, and Volume 4 (Administrative and Programmatic Requirements) on Dec. 18. 

NUREG-1949, Safety Evaluation Report Related to Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Wastes 

in a Geologic Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, Volumes 1-5, is available on the NRC website.
§ 1019.31 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This subpart B of this part 1019 states the policy of the Consumer Product Safety Commission and its interpretation of the Consumer Product Safety Act and the Federal Hazardous Substances Act with regard to exportation of products which have been sold, offered for sale, or distributed in commerce for use in the United States which: ( 1 ) Fail to comply with an applicable consumer product safety standard or banning rule issued under provisions of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2051 *et seq.*); or
( 2 ) Are “misbranded hazardous substances” or “banned hazardous substances” as those terms are used in the Federal Hazardous Substances Act (15 U.S.C. 1261 *et seq.*).
( b ) The policy expressed in this subpart B of part 1019 does not apply to any of the following products: ( 1 ) Products which could be regulated only under provisions of the Consumer Product Safety Act but which are not subject to a consumer product safety standard or banning rule issued under that Act.
( 2 ) Consumer products which are subject to and fail to comply with an applicable standard or banning rule issued under provisions of the Consumer Product Safety Act but which have never been distributed in commerce for use in the United States. See section 18(b) of the Consumer Product Safety Act 15, U.S.C. 2067(b), and subpart A of this part 1019 for requirements governing export of such products.)
( 3 ) Products which could be regulated under one or more sections of the Federal Hazardous Substances Act but which are neither “misbranded hazardous substances” nor “banned hazardous substances” as those terms are used in the Act.
( 4 ) Products which are “misbranded hazardous substances” or “banned hazardous substances” as those terms are used in the Federal Hazardous Substances Act but which have never been sold or offered for sale in domestic commerce. (See sections 5(b) and 14(d) of the Federal Hazardous Substances Act (15 U.S.C. 1264(b) and 1273(d) and subpart A of this part 1019 for requirements governing export of such products.)
( 5 ) Products for which the Commission has granted an exemption from an applicable standard, ban, or labeling requirement under the CPSA, FHSA, or FFA, in accordance with provisions of 16 CFR 1009.9. (These products remain subject to the notification requirements of subpart A of this part 1019.)
( 6 ) Products which fail to comply with an applicable standard of flammability issued under provisions of the Flammable Fabrics Act (15 U.S.C. 1191 *et seq.*). The Commission's policy regarding export of such products is set forth in the Commission's Memorandum Decision and Order *In the Matter of Imperial Carpet Mills, Inc.,* CPSC Docket No. 80-2, July 7, 1983, and allows export without regard to whether the products have been distributed in domestic commerce. (See section 15 of the Flammable Fabrics Act, 15 U.S.C. 1202, and subpart A of this part 1019 for requirements governing export of such products.)
ex10-4.htm


     

    Exhibit
      10.4

    

 

    AMENDMENT
      NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     

    This
      is
      Amendment No. 1, dated as of August 6, 2007, to the Employment Agreement dated
      as of March 13, 2006 (the “Agreement”) between Marvel Entertainment,
      Inc., a Delaware corporation formerly known as Marvel Enterprises, Inc. (the
      “Company”) and John N. Turitzin (the “Executive”).

     

    WHEREAS,
      the Company and the Executive have agreed to amend the Agreement in the manner,
      and on the terms and conditions, provided for herein;

    


    NOW
      THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and for other good and valuable
      consideration, the receipt, adequacy and sufficiency of which are hereby
      acknowledged, the parties to this amendment hereby agree as
      follows:

    


    1.            
      Amendment to Section 3.4 of the Agreement.  Effective January
      1, 2007, Section 3.4 of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced
      by
      the following:

     

    3.4           Vacation.  During
      the Term, the Executive shall be entitled to a vacation period or periods of
      three (3) weeks per year taken in accordance with the vacation policy of the
      Company during each year of the Term. Vacation time not used by the end of
      a
      calendar year shall be forfeited.

     

    2.           
       Amendment to Section 4.5(b) of the Agreement.  Effective
      on the date hereof, Section 4.5(b) of the Agreement is amended by replacing
      each
      appearance of the phrase “twelve (12)” with the phrase “six (6)”.

     

    3.            
      General.  The Agreement, as amended by this amendment, sets
      forth the entire agreement and understanding of the parties relating to the
      subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior agreements, arrangements and
      understandings, written or oral, relating to the subject matter
      hereof.  No representation, promise or inducement has been made by
      either party that is not embodied in the Agreement as amended by this amendment,
      and neither party shall be bound by or liable for any alleged representation,
      promise or inducement not so set forth.  Except as expressly changed
      by this amendment, the Agreement remains in full force in accordance with its
      terms.

     

    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this amendment as of the date
      first written above.

     

     

    
      	 	
              MARVEL
                ENTERTAINMENT, INC.

            	 
	 	 	 	 
	
               

            	
              By:
                

            	/s/ 
              Kenneth P. West	 
	 	 	Kenneth
              P. West,
              Executive Vice President 	 
	 	 	 	 


    

     

    
      	 	
              EXECUTIVE:

            	 
	 	 	 	 
	
               

            	
               

            	/s/ 
              John N. Turitzin	 
	 	 	John
              N. Turitzin
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACTRULES 13a-14(b) OR 15d-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

Melvin L. Flanigan hereby certifies pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.     He is theChief Financial Officer of DTS, Inc.

2.     The Form 10-Qreport of DTS, Inc. for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

3.     The information contained in the Form 10-Q report ofDTS, Inc. for the quarterly period ended September  30, 2005fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of DTS, Inc.
| Dated: November 9, 2005 |     |     |     |                      |
|------------------------------|----------|----------|----------|---------------------------|
|                         |     | By:      |     | /s/ MELVIN L. FLANIGAN    |
|                         |     |     |     | Melvin L. Flanigan        |
|                         | * * | * * | * * | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to DTS, Inc.and will be retained by DTS, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission upon request.

----