alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Review of Research Program Projects (P01).                     

*Date:*                         December 17, 2004.                    

*Time:*                         10 a.m. to 12 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                               ( print page 69378)    

*Contact Person:*                        Yan Z. Wang, PhD, MD, Scientific Review Administrator, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 820, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-4957.                     

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, Arthritis Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 18, 2004.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-26253 Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### Fashion Bug No. 2100 of Batavia, Inc., Respondent, v 425 West Main Associates (Batavia) LP, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[820 NYS2d 911]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Kenneth R. Fisher, J.), entered August 26, 2005. The judgment was entered upon an order granting in part plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and awarded plaintiff the sum of $133,005.48 with interest together with costs and disbursements.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for *1169the reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court *(Fashion Bug No. 2100 of Batavia, Inc. v 425 W. Main Assoc. [Batavia] LP,*10 Misc 3d 1053[A], 2005 NY Slip Op 51942[U]). Present — Pigott, Jr., RJ., Scudder, Kehoe, Smith and Green, JJ.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Patrick Henry, President and Chief Executive Officer of Entropic Communications,
Inc. (the Company), and David Lyle, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

2. The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

In
Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of April 27, 2011.



|                                                    |  |  |  |                                   
|--------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------
|/S/    PATRICK
HENRY                                |  |  |  | /S/    DAVID
LYLE                 
|Patrick Henry President and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | David Lyle Chief Financial Officer





|* | This certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company made under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, except to the extent that the Company specifically
incorporates this certification by reference therein.
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 8 A0 96 1 . CASEY ATES v

. FULTON COUNTY SUPERI OR COURT.

Pri s o n er Cas ey A t es h as fi l ed an o ri g in al m an d am u s p et i t i o n in t h i s Co u rt

. In

t h e p et i t i on , At es st at es th at i n 2 0 1 0

, he o b t ai n ed a ju d g m en t i n Bi bb Co u n t y Su p eri o r

Co u rt

, p res u m ab l y ag ai ns t t h e St at e. In 2 0 1 7, At es fi l ed a “ cl ai m ” i n Fu l t o n Co u n t y

Su p eri o r Co u rt s eek i n g t o co l l ect t h e j u d g m e n t

. 1 Acco rd i n g t o A t es , th e Fu l t o n

Co u n t y Su peri o r Co u rt “ refu s e[d ] t o p ro secu t e [h i s ] cl ai m .” At es , ho wev er, h as n ot

i n cl u d ed an y o rd er fro m Fu lt o n Co u n t y Su p eri o r Co u rt di s p os i n g o f h i s cl ai m

. A t es

as k s u s t o “ o rd er t h at [h i s ] cl ai m b e h eard fai rl y

u n d er t h e l aw.”

“ Gen eral l y , t he s u p eri o r co u rt s o f t hi s s t at e h av e t h e po wer, i n p ro p er cas es , to

i s su e p ro ces s i n t h e n at u re of m an d am u s , p ro h i b i t i o n, s p eci f

i c p erfo rm an ce, q u o

warran t o , an d i n

ju n ct i o n , an d h en ce t h e n eed t o res o rt t o th e ap pel l at e co u rt s fo r s u ch

rel i ef b y p et i t i o n fi l ed in t he ap p el l a t e co u rt s wi l l b e ex t rem el y rare.” Br o wn v.

Jo h ns o n , 2 51 Ga. 4 3 6

, 4 3 6 (3 0 6 SE2 d 6 5 5) (1 9 8 3). Bas ed o n th e l i m i t ed i n fo rm at i o n

t h a t At es h as pro v i ded u s , i t d o es n ot ap p ear t h at t h i s i s o n e o f t h e ex t rem el y rare

i n s t an ces i n wh i ch t h i s Co u rt w i l l ex erci s e ori g i n al m an d am u s ju ri s d i ct i o n. See Ga

y

v. O wen s , 2 9 2 Ga. 4 8 0

, 48 3 (2 ) (7 3 8 SE2 d 6 1 4) (2 0 1 3 ). Un t i l su ch t i m e as At es h as

p u rs u ed fo rm al rel i ef i n su p eri o r co u rt an d o b t ai n ed a ru l i ng t h ereo n , t h ere i s n o b as i s

1 It i s n o t cl ear wh et h er At es ’ s “ cl ai m ” t oo k th e fo rm o f a p ro p o s ed co m p l ai n t

. January 09, 2018fo r t h i s Co u rt t o ex erci se ju ri s d ict i o n

. See Br o wn , 25 1 Ga. at 4 3 7. Acco rd i n g l y , t h i s

p et i t i o n i s h ereb y

DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 01/09/2018
§ 27.114 Cooperative Research. ( a ) Cooperative research projects are those projects covered by this policy that involve more than one institution. In the conduct of cooperative research projects, each institution is responsible for safeguarding the rights and welfare of human subjects and for complying with this policy.
( b ) ( 1 ) Any institution located in the United States that is engaged in cooperative research must rely upon approval by a single IRB for that portion of the research that is conducted in the United States. The reviewing IRB will be identified by the Federal department or agency supporting or conducting the research or proposed by the lead institution subject to the acceptance of the Federal department or agency supporting the research.
( 2 ) The following research is not subject to this provision: ( i ) Cooperative research for which more than single IRB review is required by law (including tribal law passed by the official governing body of an American Indian or Alaska Native tribe); or
( ii ) Research for which any Federal department or agency supporting or conducting the research determines and documents that the use of a single IRB is not appropriate for the particular context.
( c ) For research not subject to paragraph (b) of this section, an institution participating in a cooperative project may enter into a joint review arrangement, rely on the review of another IRB, or make similar arrangements for avoiding duplication of effort.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 17, 2004, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), AAF Association, Inc., has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership status. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, The Post Group, Hollywood, CA has been dropped as a party to this venture. Also, the following member has changed its name: AAF Member National Imagery and Mapping Agency to National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, Reston, VA.                 

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and AAF Association, Inc., intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On March 28, 2000, AAF Association, Inc., filed its original notification pursuant to section 6 (a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on June 29, 2000 (65 FR 40127).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 30, 2004. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                    pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on August 6, 2004 (69 FR 47958).                

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-26201  Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
### **CHAPTER 90—NEIGHBORHOOD AND CITY REINVESTMENT, SELF-HELP AND REVITALIZATION**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION

Sec.
8101.
Congressional findings and declaration of purpose.
8102.
Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation.
8103.
Board of Directors.
8104.
Officers and employees.
8105.
Powers and duties of corporation.
8106.
Reports and audits.
8107.
Appropriations.
8108.
Warnings to homeowners of foreclosure rescue scams.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—NEIGHBORHOOD SELF-HELP DEVELOPMENT

8121 to 8124. Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—LIVABLE CITIES

8141.
Congressional findings.
8142.
Statement of purpose.
8143.
Definitions.
8144.
Grants to or contracts with organizations.
8145.
Coordination and development of program with other Federal and non-Federal programs.
8146.
Authorization of appropriations.
§ 16.16 Compensation. ( a ) *Committee members.* Unless otherwise provided by law, the Commission shall not compensate advisory committee members for their service on an advisory committee. In the exceptional case where the Commission is unable to meet the need for technical expertise or the requirement for balanced membership solely through the appointment of noncompensated members, the Commission may contract for or authorize the advisory committee to contract for the services of a specific consultant who may be appointed as a member of the advisory committee. In such a case, the Commission shall follow the procedures set forth in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) *Consultants.* Prior to hiring or authorizing the advisory committee to hire a consultant to an advisory committee, the Commission shall determine that the expertise or viewpoint to be offered by the consultant is not otherwise available without cost to the Commission. The compensation to be paid to such consultant may not exceed the maximum rate of pay authorized by 5 U.S.C. section 3109. Hiring of consultants shall be in accordance with OMB Circular A-120 and applicable statutes, regulations, and Executive Orders.
( c ) *Staff members.* The Commission may fix the pay of each advisory committee staff member at a rate of the General Schedule, General Management Schedule, or Senior Executive Service in which the Staff member's position would appropriately be placed (5 U.S.C. chapter 51). The Commission may not fix the pay of a staff member at a rate higher than the daily equivalent of the maximum rate for GS-15, unless the Commission has determined that under the General Schedule, General Management Schedule, or Senior Executive Service classification system, the staff member's position would appropriately be placed at a grade higher than GS-15. The Commission shall review this determination annually.
No: III-14-019 May 16, 2014

CONTACT: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663

NRC Schedules Open House May 22 to Discuss 

Performance of Fermi Nuclear Power Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold an open house May 22 to discuss the agency’s 

annual safety performance of the Fermi nuclear power plant. The single unit plant is operated by DTE 

Electric Co., and is located in Newport, Mich., about 25 miles northeast of Toledo.

The open house is scheduled for 6-7 p.m. at the Monroe County Board of Commissioners’ 

Chambers, in the Monroe County Courthouse, 125 E. Second St., in Monroe. Attendees can have oneon-one discussions with NRC staff members about the plant’s 2013 performance and the agency’s 

oversight of the facility. 

“NRC inspectors spend a significant amount of time monitoring a wide range of plant activities 

to ensure the plant operates safely. Our hands-on approach is a key factor in protecting the public and 

environment,” said NRC Region III Administrator Cynthia D. Pederson. “We hold public meetings near 

the plant every year to make our inspectors available and accessible to answer questions and have open 

discussions about NRC oversight with those who live near the plant.”

The NRC review concluded that Fermi operated safely in 2013. During the first half of the year, 

the plant received additional NRC oversight because of the number of unplanned reactor shutdowns per 

7,000 hours of operation, a key performance indicator. Once the NRC determined that DTE Electric had 

corrected the problem, the agency resumed its normal oversight. 

This year Fermi will continue to receive the detailed inspection regime used by the NRC for all 

plants. Routine inspections are performed by two NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant and by 

inspection specialists from the Region III Office in Lisle, Ill., and the agency’s headquarters in 

Rockville, Md. 

The annual assessment letter sent from the NRC Region III office to the company addresses the 

performance of the plant during 2013, and, current performance information for Fermi are available on 

the NRC website.
Adcote 49

- 126 October 2004 Page 1 of 2Adcote 49

- 126 October 2004 Page 2 of 2



### Safety, Handling and Storage

 Store in cool, dry, well ventilated area.

 Follow good manufacturing and handling practices.

 Wash thoroughly after handling. Wash contaminated goggles, face shield, and gloves.

Professionally launder contaminated clothing be fore re

- use.

 ATTENTION! Container can be hazardous when empty. Follow label warnings even after container

is empty. Do not reuse empty container without professional cleaning it first.

 Refer to Material Safety Data Sheet for more information.



## ______________________________________________________________________ Adcote is a registered trademark of Rohm and Haas Company.

These suggestions and data are based on information we believe to be reliable. They are offered in good faith, but without

guarantee, as conditions and method of use of our products are beyond our control. We recommend that the prospective user

determine the suitability of our materials and suggestions before adopting them on a commercial scale.

Sugg estions for uses of our products or the inclusion of descriptive material from patents and the citation of specific patents i n this

publication should not be understood as recommending the use of our products in violation of any patent or as permission or license

to use any patents of the Rohm and Haas Company.

Visit us at http://www.rohmhaas.com/AdhesivesSealants

Rohm and Haas Company, Midwest Technical Center, 2531 Technology Drive, Suite 301, El gin, IL 60123

Phone: 847

- 649

- 3800 Fax: 847

- 649

- 3760
### SUBCHAPTER XVIII—CRIME FREE RURAL STATE GRANTS
**Resolution
      of the Board of Directors of Colombia Goldfields Ltd. November 8,
      2007**




**RESOLVED** that,
      pursuant to Article Seven of the Company’s Bylaws, Article IX of the Company’s
      Certificate of Incorporation and Section 109(a) of the Delaware General
      Corporation Law, Article Two, Section 7 of the Company’s Bylaws is hereby
      amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:





**Section
      7. Quorum.** Except
      as otherwise provided by law or by the Certificate of Incorporation, the holders
      of one third of the voting power of the shares issued and outstanding and
      entitled to vote thereat, present in person or represented by proxy, shall
      constitute a quorum at all meetings of the shareholders for the transaction
      of
      business, except that where a separate vote by a class or series or classes
      or
      series is required, the holders of one third of the voting power of such class
      or series or classes or series issued and outstanding and entitled to vote
      thereat, present in person or represented by proxy, shall constitute a quorum.
      If, however, such quorum is not present or represented at any meeting of the
      shareholders, then either (i) the chairman of the meeting or (ii) the
      shareholders by the vote of the holders of a majority of the shares, present
      in
      person or represented by proxy, shall have power to adjourn the meeting from
      time to time without further notice of the adjourned meeting if the time and
      place of the adjourned meeting are announced at the meeting at which the
      adjournment is taken.





When
      a
      quorum is present at any meeting, the vote of the holders of a majority of
      the
      shares present in person or represented by proxy shall decide any question
      brought before such meeting, unless the question is
      one
      upon which, by express provision of the laws of the State of Delaware or of
      the
      Certificate of Incorporation or these Bylaws, a vote of a greater number or
      voting by classes is required, in which case such express provision shall govern
      and control the decision of the question.





If
      a
      quorum be initially present, the shareholders may continue to transact business
      until adjournment, notwithstanding the withdrawal of enough shareholders to
      leave less than a quorum.
§ 1502.26 Purpose; oral and written testimony; burden of proof. ( a ) The objective of a formal evidentiary hearing is the fair determination of relevant facts consistent with the right of all interested persons to participate and the public interest in promptly settling controversial matters affecting the public health and welfare.
( b ) Accordingly, the evidence at a hearing is to be developed to the maximum extent through written submissions, including written direct testimony, which may be in narrative or in question-and-answer form. ( 1 ) Direct testimony will be submitted in writing, except on a showing that written direct testimony is insufficient for a full and true disclosure of relevant facts and that the participant will be prejudiced if unable to present oral direct testimony. If the proceeding involves particular issues, each party may determine whether, and the extent to which, each wishes to present direct testimony orally or in writing.
( 2 ) Oral cross-examination of witnesses will be permitted if it appears that alternative means of developing the evidence are insufficient for a full and true disclosure of the facts and that the party requesting oral cross-examination will be prejudiced by denial of the request or that oral cross-examination is the most effective and efficient means to clarify the matters at issue.
( 3 ) Witnesses shall give testimony under oath.
( c ) A participant who proposes to substitute a new provision for a provision objected to has the burden of proof in relation to the new provision.