alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

VENTRIA BIOSCIENCE INC., Appellant

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee

WUHAN HEALTHGEN BIOTECHNOLOGY

CORP ORATION,

Intervenor

______________________

2023

- 1172

______________________

Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337

- TA

- 1238.

-------------------------------------------------

WUHAN HEALTHGEN BIOTECHNOLOGY CORP., Appellant

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee

VENTRIA BIOSCIENCE INC.,

Intervenor Case: 23-1172 Document: 21 Page: 1 Filed: 03/14/2023WUHAN HEALTHGEN BIOTECHNOLOGY CORP

. v. ITC 2

______________________

2023

- 1389

______________________

Appeal from the U nited States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337

- TA

- 1238

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Ventria Bioscience Inc. moves unopposed to voluntarily dismiss Appeal No. 2023

- 1172 pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b) and the parties’ agreement as to

the allocation of costs

. Upon consideration thereof,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :

(1) The motion is granted. Appeal No. 2023

- 1172 is

dismissed.

(2) Each party shall bear its own costs for Appeal No.

2023

- 1172.

(3) The revised official caption for Appeal No. 2023

- 1 3 89 is reflected in this order.

(4) Wuhan Healthgen Biotechnology Corp.’s opening brief in Appeal No. 2023

- 1389 is due no later than 60 days Case: 23-1172 Document: 21 Page: 2 Filed: 03/14/2023WUHAN HEALTHGEN BIOTECHNOLOGY CORP

. v. ITC 3

from the date of filing of this ord er.

March 14 , 202 3

Date F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE (for 2023

- 1172 only): March 14, 2023 Case: 23-1172 Document: 21 Page: 3 Filed: 03/14/2023
### ATTORNEY GzuEVANCE COMMISSION

OF 

### MARYLAND IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF 

### MARYLAND Misc. Docket 

### AG No.



# _ September Term, 2018 v. Petitioner,

JASON 

### MARK SIMS

Respondent. 

### ORDER Upon consideration 

### of the 

### Petition

### for Disciplinary 

### or Remedial

### Action filed by Petitioner pursuant

### to Maryland Rules l9-721(a)(2) and 

### l9-738 and 

### the Respondent's response to the Court's Order to Show Cause, 

### if any, 

### it is day

### of 2018, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland; ORDERED, that the Respondent, Jason 

### Mark Sims, be and hereby is temporarily suspended 

### from the practice

### of law in the State 

### of Maryland pursuant 

### to Maryland Rule 19-738(d) 

### until further order of this Court; and 

### it isfurther ORDERED, that the Clerk ofthis Court shall remove the name of Jason 

### Mark Sirns from the register of attorneys inthis Court and 

### certiff that factto the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and

### all Clerks of all

### judicial tribunals inthis State in accordance 

### with Maryland Rule l9-761(b).

Senior Judge 52
2017
# >June 17, 2012

US Depart-ment, ofTransportation Docket**O~rotions,** 

# M-30 , J 

# West Buildinr) Ground Floor- Room W12v140 1200 New-Jersey Ave, SE

.' ·· ··.\ WASHINGTON DC 20590

Dear Sir or Madame: P.O. Box 1695 Trophy Club, Texas 76262-1695 Tele: 828.301.0504 email: jgeitz.tx@gmail.com

The attached renewal notice under Docket Number FAA-2003-15643 

# may be permitted to expire without further action. Recent changes to Title 14 make it unnecessary to renew this exemption. Thank you,

John 

# L. Geitz

.' !

. \.**-~·** !• ! ·'\ • ./

. .

\ . 

## -. 'I \.) _.- 

# ,... .J**;~** 

### .. t !

..... 'I •t''\1 " • "· 1- "•.' ".bate: 

### 04/2672012 Exemption No: 86528 from 14 CFR (FAR Section)
- Part: .91.109 (b)(3); 91.109 (a) wili expire on 10/31/2012.1fappropriate, please submit your request to extend this exemption (including the docket number FAA-2003-15643) within 30days of the date ofthis**~otice.** Otherwise, the FAA may not be able to process your request for extension before the expiration date. You may either submityour request

. electronically through the internet using the Docket Management System web site at http:I/Regulations.gov/ or mail your**req~.oast**to: U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building groundfloor, Room W12-140 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Submissionto other locations may delay processing. Any requestfor extension must meetthe. requirements of 14 CFR part 11. Ifyou have already requested an extension for this exeh1ption or no longer need this exemption, please ignore this notice.
Exhibit 13.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
    /s/ Chi-Wen TsaiName:
    Chi-Wen TsaiTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer 
 *
    
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the SEC or its staff upon request.
§ 28.100 Conditions on use of funds. ( a ) No appropriated funds may be expended by the recipient of a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative ageement to pay any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with any of the following covered Federal actions: the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
( b ) Each person who requests or receives from an agency a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement shall file with that agency a certification, set forth in Appendix A, that the person has not made, and will not make, any payment prohibited by paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) Each person who requests or receives from an agency a Federal contract, grant, loan, or a cooperative agreement shall file with that agency a disclosure form, set forth in Appendix B, if such person has made or has agreed to make any payment using nonappropriated funds (to include profits from any covered Federal action), which would be prohibited under paragraph (a) of this section if paid for with appropriated funds.
( d ) Each person who requests or receives from an agency a commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan shall file with that agency a statement, set forth in Appendix A, whether that person has made or has agreed to make any payment to influence or attempt to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with that loan insurance or guarantee.
( e ) Each person who requests or receives from an agency a commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan shall file with that agency a disclosure form, set forth in Appendix B, if that person has made or has agreed to make any payment to influence or attempt to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with that loan insurance or guarantee.
No: III-14-023 June 23, 2014

CONTACT: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663

NRC Schedules Public Meeting June 26 to Discuss 

Performance of Palisades Nuclear Power Station

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold an open house followed by a public meeting

June 26 to discuss the agency’s annual assessment of safety performance of the Palisades Nuclear Power 

Station. The plant is operated by Entergy Nuclear Operations Inc. and is located in Covert, Mich., five 

miles south of South Haven.

The open house is scheduled for 5-6 p.m. and will provide the public with the opportunity to 

discuss past and current issues of concern with the NRC staff. It will be followed by a formal public 

meeting scheduled for 6-8:30 during which the NRC staff will discuss the plant’s 2013 performance and 

the NRC inspection activities to date. The meeting will be held at the Beach Haven Event Center, 10420 

M-140, in South Haven.

“NRC inspectors spent a significant amount of time at Palisades monitoring a wide range of 

plant activities to ensure the plant operates safely. Our hands-on approach is a key factor in protecting 

the public and environment,” said NRC Region III Administrator Cynthia D. Pederson. “We hold public 

meetings near the plant every year to make our inspectors available and accessible to answer questions 

and have open discussions about NRC oversight with those who live near the plant.”

The NRC’s review concluded that Palisades operated safely in 2013. All performance indicators 

and inspection findings for the facility showed very low risk. 

Even though Palisades had resolved the performance issues identified in 2011-2012, the NRC 

committed an additional 1,000 hours of inspection in 2013 to supplement the normal level of oversight 

of about 2,000 hours a year to make sure the plant’s corrective actions were lasting and sustainable. The 

NRC also conducted additional safety culture reviews and increased its interaction with the community 

to address issues of concern to the public. No findings of significance were identified as a result of 

additional inspections. The NRC staff will discuss these activities during the June 26 public meeting.

The NRC’s 2013 annual assessment letter discusses the identification of a “chilled work 

environment within the Security department,” during a February 2014 inspection. This means that 

“some employees at Palisades have the perception that they are not free to raise safety concerns using all 

available avenues without fear of retaliation.” NRC staff will discuss the status of this issue during the 

June 26 meeting and asked the plant to talk about their actions to address it. 
Page | 2

This year Palisades will continue to receive the detailed inspection regime used by the NRC for 

all plants. Routine inspections are performed by two NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant and 

by inspection specialists from the Region III Office in Lisle, Ill., and the agency’s headquarters in 

Rockville, Md. 

The most current performance information for Palisades is available on the NRC website.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 228 (Monday, November 29, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 69399]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26216]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--U.S. Product Data Association

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 20, 2004, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), U.S. Product Data 
Association (``US PRO'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
(1) the name and principal place of business of the standards 
development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards 
development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: U.S. Product 
Data Association, North Charleston, SC. The nature and scope of US 
PRO's standards development activities are: To provide the management 
functions for the IGES/PDES Organization (IPO) and its related 
activities, including the U.S. Technical Advisory Group (TAG) to ISO 
TC184/SC4.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-26216 Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
June 25, 2015

Mr. Mitch Highman MJOY Photography

3544 8 th Street E West Fargo, ND 58078

Dear Mr.Highman:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) . It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your June 11, exemption request on behalf of MJOY Photography into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-2229), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Merci, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report), I, Jose Acevedo, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  August 19, 2008 /s/ Jose Acevedo, President
#### King Toy & Stationery Co., Inc., et al., Respondents, v. Major Petroleum Company, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 21.1
**Subsidiaries of the Registrant**
TSYS Acquisition Corp., a Maryland corporation
TeleCommunication Systems (Holdings) Limited, a United Kingdom corporation
TeleCommunication Systems Limited, a United Kingdom corporation
TeleCommunication Systems (Maryland) AB, a Sweden corporation
TeleCommunication Systems Benelux BV, a Netherlands corporation
TeleCommunication Systems Iberian, SA, a Spain corporation
TeleCommunication Systems Technology Limited, a United Kingdom corporation
Aether European Holdings, B.V., a Netherlands corporation
Aether Systems Limited, a United Kingdom corporation
Nimbusbright Limited, a United Kingdom corporation
Aether IFX LLC, a Delaware limited liability corporation
Aether Systems (UK) Limited, a United Kingdom corporation
Aether Group (Holdings) Limited, a United Kingdom corporation
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**MEDICINOVA, INC.**

 

**Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to**

**Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for the Period Ended March 31, 2005**

 

I, Takashi Kiyoizumi, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of MediciNova, Inc., certify that: 

 

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MediciNova,Inc. (the “Registrant”); 

 

2.    Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 

 

3.    Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 

 

4.    I am responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: 

 

a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, toensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b)  [omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8392]; 

 

c)  evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

d)  disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.    I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): 

 

a)  allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

 

b)  any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
### SUBCHAPTER VII—TRANSITIONAL, SAVINGS, AND CONFORMING PROVISIONS
No: IV-13-038 December 11, 2013

CONTACT: Lara Uselding (817) 200-1519

 Victor Dricks (817) 200-1128

NRC to Discuss Performance Assessment for 

Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s staff will hold a public meeting in San Luis Obispo, 

Calif., on Dec. 18 to discuss the agency’s performance assessment for the Diablo Canyon nuclear 

power plant. The plant, located near San Luis Obispo, is operated by Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

The meeting was rescheduled from Oct. 16, 2013, due to the federal shutdown.

The meeting will be held from 6:30-9:30 p.m. at the Embassy Suites Hotel, 333 Madonna Road, 

in San Luis Obispo. In addition to the performance assessment, the NRC staff will be available to 

answer questions and hear comments from the public on issues related to the plant.

The NRC Region IV performance letter for the Diablo Canyon plant is available on the NRC

website.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b) OR 15d-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

Jon E. Kirchner hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|Date: November 9, 2007 |  |     |                                                                        
|---------------------- |  | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  | By: | /s/JON E. KIRCHNERJon E. Kirchner President and Chief Executive Officer

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to DTS, Inc. and will be retained by
DTS, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. §1350

I, Salomon Sredni, Chief Executive Officer of TradeStation Group, Inc., hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K of TradeStation Group, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TradeStation Group, Inc.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.



|               |  |                        
|-------------- |  | -----------------------
|March 12, 2010 |  | /s/ Salomon Sredni     
|Date           |  | Salomon Sredni         
|               |  | Chief Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of Samuel E. Neuman.

Application granted. Order to be settled on notice. Present — Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Dowling and Davis, JJ.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-30308 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ANDRE PATRICK STAGGERS, Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 00-CV-378-A

--------------------- September 28, 2001 Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Andre Patrick Staggers, federal prisoner #02886-095, seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). The district court granted Staggers an evidentiary hearing to develop the factual bases of his habeas claims. Staggers challenges the district court’s failure to grant his request for counsel at the evidentiary hearing. Under Rule 8(c) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings, Staggers was entitled to the appointment of counsel for the hearing. United States v. Vasquez , 7 F.3d 81 (5 th Cir. 1993).O R D E R No. 01-30308 - 2 - His motion for COA is therefore GRANTED. The district court’s judgment is VACATED and this case is REMANDED for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
#### § 1272.2 Prohibitions.

No person shall manufacture, enter into commerce, ship, transport, or receive any toy, look-alike, or imitation firearm (“device”) covered by this part as set forth in § 1272.1 unless such device contains, or has affixed to it, one of the markings set forth in § 1272.3, or unless this prohibition has been waived by § 1272.4.