alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

Certification pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Donald Mindiak, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and Thomas M. Coughlin, Principal Accounting Officer and Chief Operating
Officer of BCB Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) each certify in his capacity as an officer of the Company that he has reviewed the quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 and that to the
best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as
amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



|              |  |                                                               
|------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|July 30, 2010 |  | /s/ Donald Mindiak                                            
|              |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
|              | 
|July 30, 2010 |  | /s/ Thomas M. Coughlin                                        
|              |  | Principal Accounting Officer and Chief Operating Officer      



33
### §10502. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 10502 was editorially reclassified as section 50102 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
#### Margaret Flynn, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. The New York Central Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Page and Davis, JJ.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, R. Brooks Sherman, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A of Inergy Holdings, L.P. (the registrant);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 19, 2006



/s/ R. Brooks Sherman, Jr.R. Brooks Sherman, Jr.Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Thomas Kalliches, Inc., Appellant, v. Petros Markantes, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Callahan and Breitel, JJ.
exv10w35w6



 








Exhibit 10.35.6




(GENERALE LOGO)




Appendix 3




	 	 	 
	 

	 	BUSINESS OBJECTS SA
	 

	 	Mr. John SCHWARZ
	 

	 	157 — 159 rue Anatole France
	 
	 	 
	agence la défense entreprises
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	 

	 	92300 Levallois-Perret
	 
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	 

	 	Puteaux, July 12th, 2007






AMENDMENT LETTER




Dear Sir,



We make reference to the credit agreement (hereafter called “the credit agreement”)
between BUSINESS OBJECTS SA, having its registered office at 157—159 rue
Anatole France, 92300 Levallois-Perret, with its sole identification number 379 821
994 RCS Nanterre and SOCIETE GENERALE SA, having its registered office at 29
boulevard Haussmann, 75009 Paris, with its sole identification number 552 120 222
RCS Paris, made in Levallois-Perret on March 01st, 2006 for an amount of 100.000.000
EUR (one hundred million euros), as extended per an amendment letter dated
February 23rd, 2007 until May 31st , 2007 and re-extend per an amendment
letter dated May 23th, 2007 until July 31st, 2007.



As commonly agreed between BUSINESS OBJECTS SA and SOCIETE GENERALE, we hereby
temporarily re- extend the maturity date of the credit facility from July 31st, 2007
to December 31st, 2007.



All other terms and conditions of the credit agreement remain unchanged.



This amendment letter is submitted to French law and to the jurisdiction of the
courts in Paris.



We kindly ask you to acknowledge the temporary extension as proposed.




Yours sincerely,




	 	 	 	 
	/s/ LEFEVRE Jean-Francois 	 	/s/ John Schwarz 	 
	For SOCIETE GENERALE SA
	 	For BUSINESS OBJECTS SA	 
	 Mr. LEFEVRE Jean-Francois

	 	Mr. John SCHWARZ	 
	Deputy Manager of

	 	CEO of BUSINESS OBJECTS
	La Défense Entreprises Branch

	 	 	 





In 2 Copies


tour ariane — 5, place de la pyramide, quarter villon,
92088 paris la défense cedex 
tel 01 46 96 57 00. ccp
paris 19.931.48 w. fax 01 47 76 40 43

Illegible
§ 260.5 Carbon offsets. ( a ) Given the complexities of carbon offsets, sellers should employ competent and reliable scientific and accounting methods to properly quantify claimed emission reductions and to ensure that they do not sell the same reduction more than one time.
( b ) It is deceptive to misrepresent, directly or by implication, that a carbon offset represents emission reductions that have already occurred or will occur in the immediate future. To avoid deception, marketers should clearly and prominently disclose if the carbon offset represents emission reductions that will not occur for two years or longer.
( c ) It is deceptive to claim, directly or by implication, that a carbon offset represents an emission reduction if the reduction, or the activity that caused the reduction, was required by law.
Example 1: On its Web site, an online travel agency invites consumers to purchase offsets to “neutralize the carbon emissions from your flight.” The proceeds from the offset sales fund future projects that will not reduce greenhouse gas emissions for two years. The claim likely conveys that the emission reductions either already have occurred or will occur in the near future. Therefore, the advertisement is deceptive. It would not be deceptive if the agency's Web site stated “Offset the carbon emissions from your flight by funding new projects that will begin reducing emissions in two years.”
Example 2: An offset provider claims that its product “will offset your own ‘dirty’ driving habits.” The offset is based on methane capture at a landfill facility. State law requires this facility to capture all methane emitted from the landfill. The claim is deceptive because the emission reduction would have occurred regardless of whether consumers purchased the offsets.
Exhibit 32

Polaroid Holding CompanyCertification Pursuant to Section 906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant
to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the
undersigned, J. Michael Pocock, President and Chief Executive Officer, and William L. Flaherty, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Polaroid Holding Company, a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), do hereby certify that:

(1)   The
quarterly report on SEC Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 28, 2004 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

| | Date: May 11, 2004 |                                                                                                | /s/J. MICHAEL POCOCKJ. Michael Pocock
President and
Chief Executive Officer
| | ------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                    | /s/WILLIAM L. FLAHERTYWilliam L. Flaherty
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

---



QuickLinks
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-55,889] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on October 27, 2004 in response to a worker petition filed on behalf of workers at The Glass Group, Inc., Park Hills, Missouri. 

This petition is a duplicate of a petition instituted on October 27, 2004 (TA-W-55,864), which is the subject of an ongoing investigation. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the petition investigation has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of November, 2004. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 04-26017 Filed 11-22-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
§ 1239.2 Requirements for gates and enclosures. Each gate and enclosure must comply with all applicable provisions of ASTM F1004-22, *Standard Consumer Safety Specification for Expansion Gates and Expandable Enclosures,* approved on June 1, 2022. The Director of the Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. A read-only copy of the standard is available for viewing on the ASTM website at *https://www.astm.org/READINGLIBRARY/ .* You may obtain a copy from ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959; telephone (610) 832-9585; *www.astm.org .* You may inspect a copy at the Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, telephone (301) 504-7479, email *cpsc-os@cpsc.gov ,* or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, email *fr.inspection@nara.gov ,* or go to: *www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html .* [87 FR 68036, Nov. 14, 2022]
##### 



Exhibit 23.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Form S-8 Registration Statements File Nos. 333-48026, 333-51656,
333-66676 and 333-107466, as amended, and the Form S-3 Registration
Statements File Nos. 333-104305 and 333-112759, as amended, of our
report, dated January 30, 2004, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of TeleCommunication Systems, Inc. included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
2003. Baltimore, Maryland
February 24, 2004
§ 1702.16 Petitions requesting an exemption for a drug or a new drug. ( a ) Where the petition requests an exemption for a drug, as defined in section 201(g)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321(g)(1), the petitioner shall include those reports required to be filed under the Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Reaction Reporting Program.
( b ) [Reserved]
[45 FR 13064, Feb. 28, 1980, as amended at 66 FR 40115, Aug. 2, 2001]
### §11710. Report

The President shall, at the time the budget is submitted under section 1105 of title 31, for each fiscal year transmit to the Congress a report on the progress made in meeting the objectives of this chapter, including a review of programs established or assisted pursuant to this chapter and an assessment and recommendations of additional programs or additional assistance necessary to, at a minimum, provide health services to Native Hawaiians, and ensure a health status for Native Hawaiians, which are at a parity with the health services available to, and the health status of, the general population.

(Pub. L. 100–579, §11, Oct. 31, 1988, 102 Stat. 2923; Pub. L. 100–690, title II, §2311, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4229; Pub. L. 102–396, title IX, §9168, Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1948.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

The 1992 amendment is based on section 1 of S. 2681, One Hundred Second Congress, as passed by the Senate on Aug. 7, 1992, and enacted into law by section 9168 of Pub. L. 102–396. Section 9168, which referred to S. 2681, as passed by the Senate on "September 12, 1992", has been treated as referring to S. 2681, as passed by the Senate on Aug. 7, 1992, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

Section was formerly classified to section 11709 of this title prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 102–396.

Pub. L. 100–579 and Pub. L. 100–690 enacted substantially identical sections. The text of this section is based on section 11 of Pub. L. 100–579, as subsequently amended.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 11710, Pub. L. 100–579, §12, Oct. 31, 1988, 102 Stat. 2923; Pub. L. 100–690, title II, §2312, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4230, which related to severability, was amended generally by Pub. L. 102–396, title IX, §9168, Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1948, and transferred to section 11711 of this title.

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–396 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to compliance with Budget Act.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trump Casino Holdings, LLC, and Trump Casino Funding, Inc. (the Companies) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald J. Trump, the Chief Executive Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    DONALD J. TRUMP                                                                          
|                                                                                                
|Donald J. Trump Chief Executive Officer of Trump Casino Holdings, LLC Trump Casino Funding, Inc.



November 14, 2003
§ 970.503 Freedom of the high seas. ( a ) Before issuing or transferring an exploration license, the Administrator must find that the exploration proposed in the application will not unreasonably interfere with the exercise of the freedoms of the high seas by other nations, as recognized under general principles of international law.
( b ) In making this finding, the Administrator will recognize that exploration for hard mineral resources of the deep seabed is a freedom of the high seas. In the exercise of this right, each licensee must act with reasonable regard for the interests of other nations in their exercise of the freedoms of the high seas.
( c ) ( 1 ) In the event of a conflict between the exploration program of an applicant or licensee and a competing use of the high seas by another nation or its nationals, the Administrator, in consultation and cooperation with the Department of State and other interested agencies, will enter into negotiations with that nation to resolve the conflict. To the maximum extent possible the Administrator will endeavor to resolve the conflict in a manner that will allow both uses to take place in a manner in which neither will unreasonably interfere with the other.
( 2 ) If both uses cannot be conducted harmoniously in the area subject to the exploration plan, the Administrator will decide whether to issue or transfer the license.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Medina  International  Corp.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bradley
Colby,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Bradley Colby
-----------------------
Bradley Colby
Chief Executive Officer




<PAGE>
No: II-14-024 April 29, 2014

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416 

NRC Schedules Open House to Discuss Brunswick Nuclear Plant Performance 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials have scheduled an open house and poster session for 

May 7 to provide information on the agency’s assessment of the Brunswick nuclear power plant during 

2013. 

The informal open house and poster session is scheduled to begin at 5 p.m. in the Brunswick 

Media Center Auditorium, 8520 River Road SE, in Southport, N.C. NRC staff will be available to 

answer questions about the safety performance of the Brunswick plant as well as overall NRC oversight 

and inspection. 

The Brunswick plant, which is located about 30 miles south of Wilmington near Southport, is 

operated by Duke Energy.

Overall, the NRC staff concluded that the Brunswick plant operated safely in 2013. During 

2013, NRC inspectors identified an apparent violation related to the protection of some plant equipment 

during certain flooding scenarios. The NRC staff currently plans to continue the detailed routine or 

baseline inspections all nuclear power plants receive, but the agency’s final decision on the apparent 

violation may affect the plant’s assessment and the level of NRC oversight.

“Our resident and region-based inspectors spend many hours monitoring plant activities to 

ensure that the plant operates safely,” said NRC Region II Administrator Victor McCree. “We hold 

these meetings every year to make our staff available to people who live close to the plant and answer 

questions about our oversight.”

Routine inspections are carried out by the NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant and by 

inspection specialists from the Region II office in Atlanta.

The annual assessment letter for the Brunswick plant, as well as current performance 

information for both Unit 1 and Unit 2, is available on the NRC website.
#### In the Matter of Charmayne Coates, Appellant, v Gregory Lee, Respondent.

[819 NYS2d 837]

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (O’Donoghue, J.), dated December 20, 2004, which, inter alia, denied her motion to vacate an order of the same court dated January 26, 2004, which, upon her default in appearing at a hearing, granted the father’s petition for sole custody of the parties’ child.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The determination of whether to reheve a party of an order entered upon his or her default is within the sound discretion of the Family Court *(see Matter of Vanessa F.,*9 AD3d 464, 464-465 [2004]; *Matter of Aaron R.,*282 AD2d 464 [2001]; *Sayagh v Sayagh,*205 AD2d 678, 678-679 [1994]). A party seeking to vacate such an order must establish that there was a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense *(see*CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; *Matter of Desiree L.T.,*11 AD3d 703, 704 [2004]; *Matter of Aaron R., supra*at 464). We agree with the Family Court that the mother’s conclusory, unsupported allegations failed to demonstrate either of these requisite elements *(see Matter of Vanessa F., supra; Matter of Iris R.,*295 AD2d 521, 522 [2002]; *Matter of Shirley C.,*145 AD2d 631, 632 [1988]).

The mother also contends that the Family Court lacked sufficient information to render an informed determination consistent with the best interests of the child. This contention and her remaining contentions are without merit *(see Matter of Grassi v Grassi,*28 AD3d 482 [2006]; *Matter of Williams v O’Toole,*4 AD3d 371 [2004]; *Matter of Hermann v Chakurmanian,*243 AD2d 1003, 1004-1005 [1997]). Crane, J.P., Goldstein, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.