alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2 – 906 Certification





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C., SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the amended quarterly report on Form  10-Q/A  of TransAtlantic Capital Inc. (the "Company") for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.







Date: February 9, 2015
/s/ Kandance W. NorrisKandance W. Norris

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to TransAtlantic Capital Inc., and will be retained by TransAtlantic Capital Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D20-2195

_____________________________

REGINALD FARRIOR,

Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County.

Paul S. Bryan, Judge.

September 29, 2021

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236, 1246 (Fla. 

2004) (explaining that a trial court may dismiss, rather than 

transfer, a habeas petition when the petitioner seeks relief that 

“(1) would be untimely if considered as a motion for postconviction 

relief under rule 3.850, (2) raise claims that could have been raised 

at trial or, if properly preserved, on direct appeal of the judgment 

and sentence, or (3) would be considered a second or successive 

motion under rule 3.850 that either fails to allege new or different 

grounds for relief that were known or should have been known at 

the time the first motion was filed.”); Zuluaga v. Dep’t of Corr., 32 

So. 3d 674 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).
2

ROWE, C.J., and LEWIS and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Reginald Farrior, pro se, Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### § 306.2 Who is covered.

You are covered by this rule if you are a refiner, importer, producer, distributor, or retailer of automotive fuel.

[58 FR 41373, Aug. 3, 1993]
### §12821. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 101–625, title II, §271, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4124; Pub. L. 108–186, title I, §102, Dec. 16, 2003, 117 Stat. 2686; Pub. L. 111–8, div. I, title II, §229(4), Mar. 11, 2009, 123 Stat. 978, which related to downpayment assistance toward the purchase of single family housing, was omitted from the Code upon the expiration of Secretary's authority on Dec. 31, 2011, to make grants to participating jurisdictions to assist low-income families to achieve homeownership.
March 31, 2016 

The Honorable Sam Brownback 

Governor of Kansas 

Topeka, KS 66612-1590 

Dear Governor Brownback: 

In 1976, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) adopted a recommendation 

from several State organizations, including the National Governors Association, that each State 

appoint a single person to act as a liaison to the NRC to help improve Federal/State 

cooperation. The NRC looks to the Governor-appointed State Liaison Officer to be the primary 

communication channel between the State and the NRC. The State Liaison Officer serves as 

the key person in the State to keep the Governor and other State agencies informed about 

issues under the NRC’s jurisdiction (specifically matters addressing nuclear regulation, nuclear 

security, nuclear emergency preparedness, and radiological public health and safety) and to 

provide the NRC with State information on particular nuclear safety, security, and 

environmental issues. 

I am writing to request the continued participation of the State of Kansas in the NRC’s 

State Liaison Officer program. It is my understanding that the most recent State Liaison 

Officer, Mr. Thomas A. Conley, has been replaced by Ms. Kimberly S. Steves, Director of the 

Radiation Control Program in the Kansas Department of Health and Environment. The NRC 

will continue to work with Ms. Steves to keep you informed of our programs and activities; 

however, to ensure continued clear communication between the NRC and the State of Kansas, 

I would appreciate receiving your written affirmation of Ms. Steves, or another individual as 

your selected appointee as State Liaison Officer for the State of Kansas. 

I am providing you with a copy of the NRC brochure entitled, “State Liaison Officer 

Program,” which provides background information on, and describes the role of, the State 

Liaison Officer. I am also enclosing a copy of the NRC “2015-2016 Information Digest,” which 

provides information describing the NRC’s mission and its regulatory programs. 

If you or your staff have any questions concerning this correspondence or wish to obtain 

additional information about the State Liaison Officer program, please contact Mr. Daniel 

Collins, Director, Division of Material Safety, State, Tribal, and Rulemaking Programs, Office of 

Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, at (301) 415-3340 or by e-mail at 

Daniel.Collins@nrc.gov. 
 -2- 

I thank you in advance for your assistance. The Commission looks forward to the 

continued participation by the State of Kansas in the NRC’s State Liaison Officer program. 

Sincerely, 

/RA/ 

 Stephen G. Burns 

 

Enclosures: 

1. NRC Brochure, 

 “State Liaison Officer Program” 

2. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 

 2015-2016 Information Digest, 

 NUREG-1350, Volume 27 

 

cc: w/o enclosures 

 Kimberly S. Steves, Kansas Department 

 of Health and Environment
#### § 8a.120 Transfers of property.

If a recipient sells or otherwise transfers property financed in whole or in part with Federal financial assistance to a transferee that operates any education program or activity, and the Federal share of the fair market value of the property is not upon such sale or transfer properly accounted for to the Federal Government, both the transferor and the transferee shall be deemed to be recipients, subject to the provisions of §§ 8a.205 through 8a.235(a).
### Part C—Juvenile Delinquency Prevention Block Grant Program
§ 1.151 Commission decision on the Authority's proposed budget. ( a ) *Commission approval required.* The Authority's proposed budget takes effect only if approved by the Commission. The Commission will approve or disapprove the proposed budget after considering the public comments filed and the Commission's internal review of the Authority's submissions pursuant to § 1.150. The Commission may, in its discretion, require the Authority to submit additional information to the Commission before the Commission approves or disapproves the proposed budget. The Commission will vote on the Authority's proposed budget no later than November 1, or as soon thereafter as practicable.
( b ) *Conditional collection of fees allowed.* The notice required to be sent to State racing commissions estimating the amount required from each State for the subsequent year must state that the amount required is based on the proposed annual budget, as approved by the Board of Directors, which takes effect only if approved by the Commission. State racing commissions (or covered persons in States that do not elect to remit fees) may nevertheless elect to remit fees, and the Authority may conditionally collect them, even before the Commission approves the proposed budget. If the Commission makes any modifications to line items under paragraph (d) of this section that have the net effect of reducing the budget, the Authority must, within 30 days, refund the proportionate amount owed to any State racing commission or covered person that has conditionally paid. If the Commission makes any modifications to line items under paragraph (d) of this section that have the net effect of increasing the budget, the Authority may obtain loans to make up the difference or may account for the difference as a funding shortfall incurred in the subsequent year's proposed budget.
( c ) *Decisional criteria.* The Commission will approve the proposed budget if the Commission determines that, on balance, the proposed budget is consistent with and serves the goals of the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Act in a prudent and cost-effective manner and that its anticipated revenues are sufficient to meet its anticipated expenditures.
( d ) *Modification of line items.* In its decision on the proposed budget, the Commission may modify the amount of any line item.
### §109. Repealed. May 29, 1928, ch. 901, §1(24), 45 Stat. 986, 988

Section, acts June 12, 1917, ch. 27, 40 Stat. 121; June 5, 1920, ch. 235, 41 Stat. 885; Feb. 17, 1922, ch. 55, 42 Stat. 380; Jan. 3, 1923, ch. 22, 42 Stat. 1102; Apr. 4, 1924, ch. 84, title I, 43 Stat. 76; Jan. 20, 1925, ch. 85, 43 Stat. 757; Jan. 22, 1925, ch. 87, title I, 43 Stat. 775, required a detailed report to be made to Congress of expenditures to prevent epidemics.
Agribusiness Trades and Tenders

----

Leads From Russia, from March 1998 through January 1999 (in reverse order)
43 Leads
FOOD ADDITIVES AND PREPARATIONS - RUSSIA
               6A. CONTACT:
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-12-0009 - Final Rule:  10 CFR Part 73.37, "Physical Protection of Irradiated Reactor Fuel in Transit" (RIN 3150-AI64)

Accession Number: ML113640142

Date Released: Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML113640145 - SECY-12-0009 - Final Rule - 10 CFR 73.37 Physical Protection of Irradiated Fuel in Transit (RIN 3150-AI64) (9 page(s), 1/19/2012)
    - ML113640151 - SECY-12-0009 - Enclosure 1: FRN: Physical Protection of Irradiated Reactor Fuel in Transit (147 page(s), 1/19/2012)
    - ML113640156 - SECY-12-0009 - Enclosure 2: The Rescission Plan for Orders for Interim Safeguards and Security Compensatory Measures for the Transportation of Spent Nuclear Fuel Greater than 100 Grams. (3 page(s), 1/29/2012)
    - ML120050180 - SECY-12-0009 - Enclosure 3: Regulatory Analysis for Final Rule: 10 CFR 73.37, Physical Protection of Irradiated Reactor Fuel in Transit (21 page(s), 1/29/2012)
    - ML113640159 - SECY-12-0009 - Enclosure 4: Environmental Assessment and Finding of no Significant Impact for the Final Rule Amending 10 CFR 73.37 and 73.72, and Adding New 10 CFR 73.38 Requirements for Physical Protection of Irradiated Reactor Fuel in Transit. (6 page(s), 1/19/2012)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
May 4, 2015 

MEMORANDUM TO: Mark A. Satorius 

 Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS – SECY-14-0089 – FRESH 

ASSESSMENT OF FOREIGN OWNERSHIP, CONTROL, OR 

DOMINATION OF UTILIZATION FACILITIES

The Commission has approved the staff’s recommendation for Option 3. Under this option, the 

staff will revise the foreign ownership, control, or domination (FOCD) Standard Review Plan 

(SRP) and develop a regulatory guide to include graded negation action plan (NAP) criteria that 

would mitigate the potential for control or domination of licensee decision-making by a foreign 

entity. The criteria will be graded based on the level of FOCD and will describe acceptable 

provisions of NAPs, and will provide for the use of site-specific criteria as necessary. The 

FOCD SRP and regulatory guide should affirm the use of license conditions to incorporate 

NAPs and the staff's case-by-case, "totality of facts" review approach. The FOCD SRP and 

regulatory guide should provide additional guidance in analyzing foreign financing. The staff will 

develop a technical basis for revising the FOCD SRP and developing an FOCD regulatory 

guide. The revised FOCD SRP and FOCD regulatory guide will be published for notice and 

public comment to solicit stakeholder input. The staff should provide the final revised SRP and 

regulatory guide to the Commission for its approval. 

The staff should provide a SECY paper to the Commission presenting options for developing a 

formalized method of performing inimicality reviews. This process should include procedures 

for consulting with the intelligence community. 

 (EDO) (SECY Suspense: 2/4/16) 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA 

 OPA 

 Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR
§ 1101.46 Other administrative or judicial proceeding exception. ( a ) *Statutory provision.* Section 6(b)(4)(B) provides that the requirements of section 6(b)(1) do not apply to public disclosure of “information in the course of or concerning any * * * other administrative or judicial proceeding under this Act.”
( b ) *Scope of exception.* This exception applies to an administrative or judicial proceeding, other than a rulemaking or administrative adjudicatory proceeding, under the CPSA, FHSA, FFA, or PPPA. Proceedings within this exception include: ( 1 ) A proceeding to act on a petition to start a rulemaking proceeding. This proceeding begins with the filing of a petition and ends when the petition is denied or, if granted, when the rulemaking proceeding begins. Information subject to the exception for petition proceedings is the petition itself and the supporting documentation, and information subsequently compiled by the staff and incorporated or referenced in the staff briefing papers for and recommendation to the Commission.
( 2 ) A proceeding to act on a request for exemption from a rule or regulation. This proceeding begins with the filing of a request for exemption and ends when the request is denied or, if granted, when the Commission takes the first step to implement the exemption, e.g., when an amendment to the rule or regulation is proposed.
( 3 ) A proceeding to issue a subpoena or general or special order. This proceeding begins with a staff request to the Commission to issue a subpoena or general or special order and ends once the request is granted or denied.
( 4 ) A proceeding to act on a motion to quash or to limit a subpoena or general or special order. This proceeding begins with the filing with the Commission of a motion to quash or to limit and ends when the motion is granted or denied.
( 5 ) Any judicial proceeding to which the Commission is a party. This proceeding begins when a complaint is filed and ends when a final decision (including appeal) is rendered with respect to the Commission.
( 6 ) Any administrative proceeding to which the Commission is a party, such as an administrative proceeding before the Merit Systems Protection Board or the Federal Labor Relations Authority. This proceeding begins and ends in accordance with the applicable regulations or procedures of the administrative body before which the proceeding is heard.
( 7 ) A proceeding to obtain a retraction from the Commission pursuant to subpart F of these rules. This proceeding begins with the filing with the Secretary of the Commission of a request for retraction and ends when the request is denied or, if granted, when the information is retracted.
( c ) *In the course of or concerning.* The phrase “in the course of or concerning” shall have the same meaning as set forth in either § 1101.44 (c) and
( d ) or § 1101.45 (c) and (d), whichever is applicable.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3587 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide for the application 

of Medicaid prompt pay requirement to claims for payment for covered 

items and services furnished by any Medicaid health care entity. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 7, 2011 

Mr. BILBRAY (for himself and Ms. ESHOO) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide 

for the application of Medicaid prompt pay requirement 

to claims for payment for covered items and services 

furnished by any Medicaid health care entity. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair Pay to Medicaid 

5 Providers Act of 2011’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3587 IH

1 SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF MEDICAID PROMPT PAY REQUIRE2 MENTS TO ALL MEDICAID HEALTH CARE EN3 TITIES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1902 of the Social Secu5 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 1396a) is amended in subsection (a), 

6 in the matter following paragraph (83), by striking ‘‘For 

7 purposes of this title’’ and inserting ‘‘Subject to the pre8 vious sentence, a State plan shall not be in compliance 

9 with the requirement of clause (A) of paragraph (37) un10 less (i) such plan applies such requirement to claims for 

11 payment made for items and services covered under the 

12 plan and furnished by any person or entity eligible for pay13 ment under such plan (insofar as such person or entity 

14 is paid under this title on the basis of submission of 

15 claims) in the same or similar manner (but applying the 

16 same timeframes specified under such clause) as such plan 

17 applies such requirement to such services furnished by a 

18 practitioner described in such clause; and (ii) such plan 

19 provides for quarterly reports to be submitted by the State 

20 to the Secretary, presented by provider type, on the extent 

21 to which the State during each month of the previous 

22 quarter was in compliance with the requirement under 

23 such clause, including as applied under this sentence. For 

24 purposes of this title’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3587 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) shall apply to claims made for covered serv3 ices after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 228 (Monday, November 29, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 69396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26222]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--International Association of Plumbing and 
Mechanical Officials

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 14, 2004, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), International Association 
of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials (``IAPMO'') has filed written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of 
business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature 
and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications 
were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting 
the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances.
    Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: International 
Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, Ontario, CA. The 
nature and scope of IAPMO's standards development activities are: The 
development of minimum standards and requirements to safeguard life or 
limb, health, property and public welfare by regulating and controlling 
the design, construction, installation, quality of materials, location, 
operation and maintenance or use of plumbing, heating, ventilating, 
cooling, refrigeration systems, incinerators, and other miscellaneous 
heat producing appliances. The activity also includes the development 
of performance standards for synthetic organic plumbing fixtures and 
standards for the composition, dimensions, and/or mechanical and 
physical properties of materials, fixtures, devices and equipment used 
or installed in plumbing or mechanical systems.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-26222 Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
```
Table of Contents

Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Salomon Smith Barney Orion Futures Fund L.P. (the"Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the periodending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, David J. Vogel, President and Director of Citigroup Managed FuturesLLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Partnership.

/s/    DavidJ. Vogel

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

David J.VogelCitigroup Managed Futures LLC President and Director

May 12, 2006

----
EXHIBIT 23.2

# CONSENT OF REGISTERED
 PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Pavilion Bancorp, Inc. on
Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-86636) and Form S-3D (File No. 333-112651) of our report dated January 13, 2004 on the
2003 and 2002 Consolidated Financial Statements of Pavilion Bancorp, Inc. (prior to the subsequent adjustments,
on which we have not performed any auditing procedures and do not express an opinion thereon, described in Note
15 to the financial statements in the 2004 Form 10-K applied to restate the 2003 and 2002 financial statements),
which report is included in the 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Pavilion Bancorp, Inc.

| | /s/ CROWE CHIZEK AND COMPANY
 LLCCROWE CHIZEK AND COMPANY LLC
| | -------------------------------------------------------------

Grand Rapids, Michigan
November 28, 2005