alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 1 0

- 1 0 6 9 3 C o n f e r e n c e C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v
. A N T O N I O T R U J I L L O , D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e N o r t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o
. 2 : 1 0

- C R

- 8

- 1

B e f o r e J O L L Y , O W E N , a n d H A Y N E S , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : * T h e F e d e r a l P u b l i c D e f e n d e r a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t A n t o n i o T r u j i l l o h a s

m o v e d f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f i l e d a b r i e f i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h A n d e r s v
. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 ) , a n d U n i t e d S t a t e s v
. F l o r e s , 6 3 2 F

. 3 d 2 2 9 ( 5 t h C i r
. 2 0 1 1 )

. T r u j i l l o h a s n o t f i l e d a r e s p o n s e
. W e h a v e r e v i e w e d c o u n s e l ’ s b r i e f

a n d t h e r e l e v a n t p o r t i o n s o f t h e r e c o r d r e f l e c t e d t h e r e i n
. W e c o n c u r w i t h

c o u n s e l ’s a s s e s s m e n t t h a t t h e a p p e a l p r e s e n t s n o n o n f r i v o l o u s i s s u e f

o r a p p e l l a t e

r e v i e w
. A c c o r d i n g l y , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D April 19 , 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R
. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-10693 Document: 00511450339 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/19/2011N o
. 1 0

- 1 0 6 9 3

c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e A P P E A L I S D I S M I S S E D

. S e e 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

.

2 Case: 10-10693 Document: 00511450339 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/19/2011
EXHIBIT 31.1

     CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Steve Careaga, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Nannaco, Inc.
("registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.



July 26, 2005



/s/ Steve Careaga
---------------------------
Steve Careaga
Principal Executive Officer
**MENU**
Preface
Introduction

Breeches, Blouses, and Skirts

Photofile

Bibliography

Notes

Appendix A

Appendix B

Appendix C
### Part B—Strategic Petroleum Reserve
No: III-13-043 November 8, 2013

CONTACT: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663

NRC Names New Resident Inspector at Point Beach Nuclear Station

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has selected Kevin Barclay as 

the new resident inspector at the Point Beach Nuclear Power Plant in Two 

Rivers, Wis., approximately 13 miles northeast of Manitowoc.

Barclay joined the NRC as a reactor engineer in Region III in 2006. 

He served as a resident inspector at Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant. Prior 

to joining the agency, he worked on the nuclear propulsion system of the 

aircraft carrier USS Ronald Reagan. He received a bachelor’s of science degree in chemistry from the 

University of Wisconsin-LaCrosse and a master’s degree in engineering management from Old 

Dominion University. Barclay also served as a Naval Science Instructor for the Naval Reserve Officers 

Training Corps program at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

“Kevin Barclay is an excellent inspector with a firm commitment to safety. He will help the 

NRC fulfill its mission of protecting people and the environment by ensuring the Point Beach plant 

operates at the high standards set by the NRC,” said Region III Administrator Cynthia D. Pederson.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear plant site has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They serve as 

the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major work projects and 

interacting with plant workers and the public. Barclay joins Senior Resident Inspector Stephen Burton at 

the facility. Both inspectors can be reached at (920) 755-2309.
May 15, 2015 

MEMORANDUM TO: Maureen E. Wylie 

 Chief Financial Officer 

FROM: Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS – SECY-15-0044 – PROPOSED 

VARIABLE ANNUAL FEE STRUCTURE FOR SMALL MODULAR 

REACTORS 

The Commission has approved the staff’s recommendation to proceed with a rulemaking that 

would amend Part 171 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, “Annual Fees for Reactor 

Licenses and Fuel Cycle Licenses and Materials Licenses, Including Holders of Certificates of 

Compliance, Registrations, and Quality Assurance Program Approvals and Government 

Agencies Licensed by the NRC,” and other affected parts, to include a variable annual fee 

structure for Small Modular Reactors (SMRs). 

The staff should keep the Commission informed of necessary changes as it gains additional 

experience with this and other novel issues presented by SMRs. 

 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 OGC 

 EDO 

 OCA 

 OPA 

 Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR
#### § 930.50 Objectives.

The provisions of this subpart are intended to ensure that any required federal license or permit activity affecting any coastal use or resource is conducted in a manner consistent with approved management programs. The provisions of subpart I of this part are intended to supplement the provisions of this subpart for federal license or permit activities having interstate coastal effects.
#### § 1310.3 Banned hazardous product.

Any inclined sleeper for infants, as defined in section 1310.2, regardless of the date of manufacture, is a banned hazardous product under section 8 of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2057).
§ 1401.3 Definitions. For the purposes of this part 1401: ( a ) *Chlorofluorocarbon* means any fully halogenated chlorofluoroalkane.
( b ) *Finished product* means a product which has been completely manufactured, packaged, and labeled.
( c ) *Initially introduced into interstate commerce* means the first shipment of the product into interstate commerce by the firm marketing the product. There must be both physical movement in interstate commerce and passage of title to the product. Thus, mere shipment of a product across state lines from a contract filler to the marketer of the product would not constitute initial introduction into interstate commerce. All products initially introduced into interstate commerce before the effective date may continue to be distributed and sold even though they do not bear the warning statement.
( d ) *Manufacturer* means any person who manufactures or imports a consumer product. The term includes both a person who manufactures the product at the direction of another (such as a contract filler of aerosol products) and the person at whose direction the product is manufactured (such as the marketer of the brand).
( e ) *Propellent* means a liquefied or compressed gas in a container, where a purpose of the liquefied or compressed gas is to expel material from the container. The material to be expelled may be the propellant itself and/or a material different from the propellent.
( f ) The definitions given in section 3 of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2052) shall, where applicable, apply to this part 1401.
(August 15, 2006)

#### Maria Aparicio, Appellant, v John Fazio, Respondent.

[820 NYS2d 307]

*448In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (LaCava, J.), entered February 17, 2005, as, upon an order of the same court dated January 10, 2005, granting the defendant’s motion to set aside so much of a jury verdict as found that the plaintiff sustained damages for past medical expenses in the sum of $33,259.48, failed to award her damages for past medical expenses.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

In this action to recover damages for personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff awarding damages in the sums of $40,000 for past pain and suffering, $10,000 for future pain and suffering, and $33,259.48 for past medical expenses. The defendant subsequently moved to set aside so much of the verdict as awarded the sum of $33,259.48 for past medical expenses upon the ground that medical expenses not exceeding the sum of $50,000 constitute basic economic loss and are not recoverable under the no-fault insurance law. The Supreme Court granted the motion and entered judgment only for the jury’s damage awards for pain and suffering. We affirm.

New York’s no-fault insurance law expressly provides that basic economic loss incurred as a result of the use or operation of a motor vehicle is not recoverable in a personal injury action *(see*Insurance Law § 5104 [a]). Basic economic loss is defined as including the first $50,000 of medical expenses *(see*Insurance Law § 5102 [a] [1]). Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the plaintiffs argument on appeal that the parties’ trial stipulation allowing her medical bills into evidence operated as a waiver by the defendant of the no-fault insurance law’s prohibition of recovery for basic economic loss is properly before this Court. However, the argument is without merit.

A plain reading of the parties’ stipulation at issue on this appeal shows that it was evidentiary in nature and in no way worked to waive the Insurance Law’s prohibition against recovery for basic economic loss in this lawsuit. The Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s postverdict motion to set aside the jury’s award of $33,259.48 for the plaintiffs past medical expenses and properly entered judgment accordingly *(see Tsamasiros v Hughes,*5 AD3d 377 [2004]; *Lloyd v Russo,*273 AD2d 359, 360 [2000]; *Ellis v Johnson Motor Lines,*198 AD2d 258, 259 [1993]).

*449In light of our determination, the defendant’s remaining contention has been rendered academic. Schmidt, J.P., Ritter, Santucci and Lunn, JJ., concur.
### §11372. Grant assistance

The Secretary shall make grants to States and local governments (and to private nonprofit organizations providing assistance to persons experiencing homelessness or at risk of homelessness, in the case of grants made with reallocated amounts) for the purpose of carrying out activities described in section 11374 of this title.

(Pub. L. 100–77, title IV, §412, as added Pub. L. 111–22, div. B, title II, §1201(4), May 20, 2009, 123 Stat. 1678.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 11372, Pub. L. 100–77, title IV, §412, July 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 496; Pub. L. 101–625, title VIII, §832(f)(2), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4361; Pub. L. 104–330, title V, §506(a)(2), Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4044, which related to grant assistance, was repealed by Pub. L. 111–22, div. B, title II, §1201(4), May 20, 2009, 123 Stat. 1678.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the earlier of 18 months after May 20, 2009, or 3 months after publication of certain final regulations by Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, see section 1503 of Pub. L. 111–22, set out as an Effective Date of 2009 Amendment note under section 11302 of this title.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-15-0056-Denial of Petition for Rulemaking (PRM-32-8)

Accession Number: ML15020A114

Date Released: Wednesday, July 29, 2015

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML15020A133 - SECY-15-0056:  Denial of Petition for Rulemaking (PRM-32-8) (5 page(s), 4/7/2015)
    - ML15020A187 - SECY-15-0056:  Enclosure 1-Federal Register Notice (12 page(s), 4/7/2015)
    - ML15022A114 - SECY-15-0056:  Enclosure 2 - Campco Petition. (3 page(s), 4/7/2015)
    - ML15022A176 - SECY-15-0056:  Enclosure 3-Campco Petition-Supplemental Information (19 page(s), 9/18/2012)
    - ML15020A164 - SECY-15-0056:  Enclosure 4 - Draft Letter to the Petitioner (6 page(s), 4/7/2015)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
APPENDIX B 

FISCAL NOTE FOR PROPOSED RULES 

Rule Title: 45CSR14 - "Permits for Construction and Maior Modification of Maior 

Stationary Sources of Air Pollution for the Prevention of Significant 

Deterioration" $4 

. , 

Type of Rule: X Legislative interpretive Procedural ', (* - 

Agency: Division of Air Quality + - 

-- Address: 601 57th Street SE 

Charleston, WV 25304 

Phone Number: 926-0475 Email: 

Fiscal Note Summary 

Summarize in a clear and concise manner what impact this measure 

will have on costs and revenues of state government. 

No impact above that resulting from currently applicable federal emission standards. 

Fiscal ~ote' Detail 

Show over-all effect in Item 1 and 2 and, in Item 3, give an explanation of 

Breakdown by fiscal year, including long-range effect. 

I FISCAL YEAR I 

Effect of Proposal 

1. Estimated Total Cost 

Personal Services 

Current Expenses 

Repairs & Alterations 

Assets 

Equipment 

Other 

2. Estimated Total Revenues 

2009 

IncreaseDecrease 

(use "-'I) 

$0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

2010 

IncreaseDecrease 

(use "-") 

$0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

Fiscal Year 

(Upon Full Implementation) 

$0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 
Rule Title: 45CSR14 - "Permits for Construction and Major Modification of Major 

Stationary Sources of Air Pollution for the Prevention of Significant 

Deterioration" 

3. Explanation of above estimates (including long-range effect): 

Please include any increase or decrease in fees in your estimated total revenues. 

Any costs incurred by revision to this rule were included in cost estimates prepared for 

implementation of Title V of the Clean Air Act, as amended, under 45CSR30. 

MEMORANDUM 

Please identify any areas of vagueness, technical defects, reasons the proposed 

rule would not have a fiscal impact, andlor any special issues not captured elsewhere on 

this form. 

Date: ?\\$%
#### Edward Higgins, Plaintiff, v. Edward Piddise, Defendant.

Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon stipulation.
### Part B—All-Hazards Emergency Preparedness and Response

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 109–417, title I, §102(a)(1), Dec. 19, 2006, 120 Stat. 2832, inserted "All-Hazards" before "Emergency Preparedness" in heading.
#### Paris Montrose, Respondent, v. Manny M. Kopp, Appellant.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Appellate Division denied, with $10 costs. Present — Adel, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldoek, JJ.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-15-00168-CR

ERIC MOSQUEDA,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 54th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-1757-C2

ORDER

Appellant’s Unopposed Motion to File Amended Brief for Appellant, filed on 

December 7, 2015, is granted. Appellant’s amended brief is filed as of the date of its 

receipt.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion granted

Order issued and filed December 17, 2015
No: IV-14-022 September 19, 2014

CONTACT: Victor Dricks, 817 200-1128

Lara Uselding, 817 200-1519

NRC to Hold Public Meeting to Discuss Status of Fort Calhoun Nuclear Station

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with Omaha Public Power District (OPPD) 

officials on Sep. 25 to discuss the status of performance improvement activities at the Fort Calhoun 

nuclear power plant. The plant, operated by OPPD, is located 19 miles north of Omaha, Neb.

The meeting will be held from 6 to 9 p.m. at the Omaha Marriot, 10220 Regency Circle, in 

Omaha, Neb. NRC officials will answer questions from the public after the business portion of the 

meeting.

The plant remains under increased NRC oversight and the discussion will center on the status of 

OPPD’s improvement initiatives in the engineering and operations performance areas, results of selfassessment activities, and effectiveness of the corrective action process.

NRC staff will also discuss the results of a recent inspection that looked at actions taken by 

OPPD to address commitments described in the post-restart Confirmatory Action Letter and 

specifically the corrective action program. The inspection report will be available here at 

ML14261A455.

Items described in the post-restart Confirmatory Action Letter must be resolved before the plant 

would be allowed to return to the NRC’s reactor oversight process. The plant restarted Dec. 18, 2013, 

after a shutdown of 32 months.
### §10416. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 98–457, title III, §316, as added Pub. L. 103–322, title IV, §40211, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1925; amended Pub. L. 106–386, div. B, title II, §1204, Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1507; Pub. L. 108–36, title IV, §411, June 25, 2003, 117 Stat. 827; Pub. L. 109–162, title II, §206, Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 3002, which provided for national domestic violence hotline and Internet grants, was omitted in the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 111–320, title II, §201, Dec. 20, 2010, 124 Stat. 3484. See section 10413 of this title.
### **CHAPTER 93—THEODORE ROOSEVELT ISLAND**

Sec.
9301.
Maintenance and administration.
9302.
Consent of Theodore Roosevelt Association required for development.
9303.
Access to Theodore Roosevelt Island.
9304.
Source of appropriations.
§ 923.48 Documentation. A transmittal letter signed by the Governor is required for the submission of a management program for federal approval. The letter must state that the Governor: ( a ) Has reviewed and approved as State policy, the management program, and any changes thereto, submitted for the approval of the Assistant Administrator.
( b ) Has designated a single State agency to receive and administer implementation grants;
( c ) Attests to the fact that the State has the authorities necessary to implement the management program; and
( d ) Attests to the fact that the State is organized to implement the management program.
Exhibit 32


CERTIFICATION





In connection with the periodic report of The Clorox Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2024,  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), we, Linda Rendle, Chair and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Kevin B. Jacobsen, Executive Vice President - Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to our knowledge:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and


(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.





This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.





Date: February 3, 2025





/s/ Linda RendleLinda RendleChair and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Kevin B. JacobsenKevin B. JacobsenExecutive Vice President - Chief Financial Officer
#### § 1119.1 Purpose.

This part sets forth the Consumer Product Safety Commission's (Commission) interpretation of the statutory factors considered in determining the amount of civil penalties that the Commission may seek or compromise. The policies behind, and purposes of, civil penalties include the following: Deterring violations; providing just punishment; promoting respect for the law; promoting full compliance with the law; reflecting the seriousness of the violation; and protecting the public.