alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC STAFF TO MEET WITH FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT TO DISCUSS

INSPECTION OF ST. LUCIE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a meeting with officials of 

Florida Power & Light for 1 p.m. Friday, Nov. 9, to discuss a supplemental inspection of the St. 

Lucie nuclear power plant located in Jensen Beach, Fla.

The meeting, which is open to the public, will be held in Stuart/Martin County Chamber 

of Commerce, 1650 South Kanner Highway, in Stuart. NRC officials will be available to answer 

questions from the public after the business portion of the meeting.

A supplemental inspection is one that is added to the NRC's normal, or baseline, 

inspection program in response to specific events or declining regulatory performance. The 

inspection at St. Lucie was conducted during the second week in October and reviewed FPL’s 

response to two White performance indicators related to unplanned shutdowns on Unit 1. Those 

indicators put St. Lucie Unit 1 in the degraded cornerstone column of the NRC’s action matrix.

Earlier this year, St. Lucie Unit 1 crossed the green-to-white threshold for the NRC’s 

Unplanned Scrams per 7,000 Critical Hours performance indicator. That was due to a total of 

three trips during the second half of 2011 and early 2012. In addition, the NRC identified that the 

Unplanned Scrams with Complications performance indicator also crossed the green-to-white 

threshold after two complicated trips during the same period. A White performance indicator 

means a plant has fallen below the NRC’s expected range of performance in that area.

A supplemental inspection was conducted to assure that the causes of the shutdowns were 

understood, that the extent of condition was identified, and to ensure FPL’s corrective actions 

were sufficient. The purpose of the Nov. 9 meeting is to discuss FPL’s performance and

corrective actions.

The NRC evaluates both inspection findings and performance indicators at commercial 

nuclear power plants with a color-coded system which classifies them as green, white, yellow or 

red, in increasing order of safety significance. As the significance increases, the NRC increases 

the level of oversight for that plant. If a plant takes appropriate corrective actions and improves 

safety performance, the agency returns to its normal, but still extensive, inspection schedule.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No: II-12-062

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416

 

 October 26, 2012 

E-mail: OPA2.Resource@nrc.gov
### 

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand.

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.
### SUBCHAPTER III—TRAINING AND DEVELOPING STATE AND LOCAL EMPLOYEES
### Part C—Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality
EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Medina  International  Corp.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31,2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bradley
Colby,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Bradley Colby
-----------------------
Bradley Colby
Chief Executive Officer




<PAGE>
#### § 0.12 Office of the Secretary.

The Secretary is the legal custodian of the Commission's seal, property, papers, and records, including legal and public records, and is responsible for the minutes of Commission meetings. The Secretary, or in the Secretary's absence an Acting Secretary, signs Commission orders and official correspondence. In addition, the Secretary is responsible for the publication of all Commission actions that appear in the Federal Register and for the publication of Federal Trade Commission decisions.

[86 FR 38546, July 22, 2021]
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2375 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2375

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the contribution 
            limits applicable to simple retirement accounts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 5, 2003

    Ms. Millender-McDonald introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the contribution 
            limits applicable to simple retirement accounts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN CONTRIBUTION LIMITS APPLICABLE TO SIMPLE 
              RETIREMENT ACCOUNTS.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (E) of section 408(p)(2) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to applicable dollar amount; 
cost-of-living adjustment) is amended to read as follows:
                    ``(E) Applicable dollar amount.--For purposes of 
                subparagraph (A)(ii), the applicable dollar amount for 
                any year beginning in any calendar year is the excess 
                of--
                            ``(i) the applicable dollar amount 
                        determined under section 402(g)(1)(B) for 
                        taxable years beginning in such calendar year, 
                        over
                            ``(ii) $2,000.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to years beginning after December 31, 2003.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 35 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the deduction 

for certain expenses of elementary and secondary school teachers to 

$500 and to extend it through 2013. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 5, 2011 

Mrs. BIGGERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the deduction for certain expenses of elementary and 

secondary school teachers to $500 and to extend it 

through 2013. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as ‘‘Teacher Tax Reduction 

5 Act of 2011’’. 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 35 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE AND EXTENSION OF DEDUCTION FOR 

2 CERTAIN EXPENSES OF ELEMENTARY AND 

3 SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHERS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (D) of section 

5 62(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating 

6 to certain trade and business deductions of employees) is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘$250’’ and inserting ‘‘$500’’, 

9 and 

10 (2) by striking ‘‘during 2002’’ and all that fol11 lows through ‘‘2011’’ and inserting ‘‘after 2001 and 

12 before 2014’’. 

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

14 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

15 December 31, 2010. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
No: IV-15-015 June 15, 2015

 CONTACT: Victor Dricks 817-200-1128

 Lara Uselding 817-200-1519

 

NRC Names New Senior Resident Inspector at the Grand Gulf Nuclear Power Plant

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has selected Matt Young as

the new Senior Resident Inspector at the Grand Gulf nuclear power plant,

located in Port Gibson, Miss.

“Matt Young's technical experience and regulatory perspective will

assist the NRC in carrying out its mission of protecting people and the

environment and ensuring the safe operation of Grand Gulf,”

said NRC Region IV Administrator Marc Dapas.

Young joined the NRC’s Region IV office in Arlington, Texas, in 2006. He graduated from the

agency’s Nuclear Safety Professional Development Program. Young has also worked as a reactor

inspector in the Division of Reactor Safety, performing engineering inspections. He holds bachelor

degrees in mechanical and nuclear engineering, and a master’s degree in nuclear engineering from

Pennsylvania State University. For the past 20 months he has served as a Resident Inspector at the

Arkansas Nuclear One plant in Russellville, Ark.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two Resident Inspectors. Young joins

Resident Inspector Neil Day. They serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting

inspections and monitoring significant work projects.

The Grand Gulf Resident Inspectors can be reached at 601-437-4620.
Flint Hills National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan - September 2000

Map 1. Vicinity Map

Contents

Map 1. Vicinity Map ................................................................... 1

Map 2. Ecoregion Map .............................................................. 2

Map 3. Base Map ........................................................................ 3

Map 4. Soils Map ........................................................................ 4

Map 5. Wetland Units Map ....................................................... 5

Map 6. Cropland/Farmland Map .............................................. 6

Map 7. Public UseMap .............................................................. 7

Map 8. Hunting Map .................................................................. 8

Map 9. Wetland Habitat Map ................................................... 9

Map 10. Habitats of Refuge Concern ........................................ 10
Flint Hills National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan - September 2000

Map 2. Ecoregion Map
Flint Hills National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan - September 2000

Map 3. Base Map
Flint Hills National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan - September 2000

Map 4. Soils Map
Flint Hills National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan - September 2000

Map 5. Wetland Units Map
Flint Hills National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan - September 2000

Map 6. Cropland/Farmland Map
Flint Hills National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan - September 2000

Map 7. Public UseMap
Flint Hills National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan - September 2000

Map 8. Hunting Map
Flint Hills National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan - September 2000

Map 9. Wetland Habitat Map
Flint Hills National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan - September 2000

Map 10. Habitats of Refuge Concern
#### Max Swersky, Plaintiff, v. Bruson Heights Corp., et al., Defendants. Bruson Heights Corp., Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Beny Falco, Doing Business as Falco Concrete Co., Third-Party Defendant. Bruson Heights Corp., Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Joseph Donofrio, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the third-party plaintiff-respondent. Whether there could be a recovery over in the present case should await trial. The question may not be determined upon the pleadings. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Breitel, JJ.
### §12908. Rental assistance

#### (a) Use of funds

#### (1) In general

Grants under this section may be used only for assistance to provide rental assistance for low-income eligible persons. Such assistance may be project based or tenant based and shall be provided to the extent practicable in the manner provided for under section 1437f of this title. Grantees shall ensure that the housing provided is decent, safe, and sanitary.

#### (2) Shared housing arrangements

Grants under this section may be used to assist individuals who elect to reside in shared housing arrangements in the manner provided under section 1437f(p) of this title, except that, notwithstanding such section, assistance under this section may be made available to nonelderly individuals. The Secretary shall issue any standards for shared housing under this paragraph that vary from standards issued under section 1437f(p) of this title only to the extent necessary to provide for circumstances of shared housing arrangements under this paragraph that differ from circumstances of shared housing arrangements for elderly families under section 1437f(p) of this title.

#### (b) Limitations

A recipient under this section shall comply with the following requirements:

#### (1) Services

The recipient shall provide for qualified service providers in the area to provide appropriate services to the eligible persons assisted under this section.

#### (2) Intensive assistance

For any individual with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome or related diseases who requires more care than can be provided in housing assisted under this section, the recipient shall provide for the locating of a care provider who can appropriately care for the individual and referral of the individual to the care provider.

#### (c) Administrative costs

A project sponsor providing rental assistance under this section may use amounts from any grant received under this section for administrative expenses involved in providing such assistance, subject to the provisions of 12905(g)(2) 1 of this title.

(Pub. L. 101–625, title VIII, §859, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4381; Pub. L. 102–550, title VI, §606(h)(1), (j)(6), (7), (11)(D), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3810, 3811.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–550, §606(h)(1)(A), substituted "Rental assistance" for "Short-term rental assistance" in section catchline.

Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 102–550, §606(h)(1)(B), (j)(11)(D), struck out "short-term" before "rental assistance" and substituted "eligible persons" for "individuals with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome or related diseases".

Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 102–550, §606(j)(6), substituted "eligible persons" for "individuals".

Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 102–550, §606(j)(7), inserted "with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome or related diseases" after "any individual".

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 102–550, §606(h)(1)(C), added subsec. (c).

1 So in original. Probably should be preceded by "section".
### Part E—General Provisions

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Part E of title XXVI of the Public Health Service Act, comprising this part, was originally added to act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, by Pub. L. 101–381, title IV, §411(a), Aug. 18, 1990, 104 Stat. 622, and amended by Pub. L. 104–146, May 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1346. Part E is shown herein, however, as having been added by Pub. L. 109–415, title IV, §501, Dec. 19, 2006, 120 Stat. 2812, without reference to the intervening amendments because of the extensive revision of part E by Pub. L. 109–415.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 300ff–80, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XXVI, §2680, as added Pub. L. 101–381, title IV, §411(a), Aug. 18, 1990, 104 Stat. 622, related to grants for implementation of recommendations in guidelines and model curriculum.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3477 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3477

                      One Hundred Twelfth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twelve

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
    133 Hare Road in Crosby, Texas, as the Army First Sergeant David 
                     McNerney Post Office Building.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ARMY FIRST SERGEANT DAVID MCNERNEY POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 133 Hare Road in Crosby, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Army First Sergeant David McNerney Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Army First 
Sergeant David McNerney Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
### §10904. Annual report by States; contents; manner of payments pursuant to grants

#### (a) Reporting

Each State receiving grants under this chapter shall annually submit to the Secretary information on the number of eligible individuals assisted under the grant program, and their positions and salaries before and after receiving the Child Development Associate credential.

#### (b) Payments

Payments pursuant to grants made under this chapter may be made in installments, and in advance or by way of reimbursement, with necessary adjustments on account of overpayments or underpayments, as the Secretary may determine.

(Pub. L. 99–425, title VI, §605, Sept. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 977.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1986, see section 1001 of Pub. L. 99–425, set out as an Effective Date of 1986 Amendment note under section 8621 of this title.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-30026

Summary Calendar

WANDA M. BELLOW,

Plaintiff–Appellant

v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant–Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 6:06-CV-920

Before WIENER, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Wanda M. Bellow appeals the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of

her application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits. On

review, “we consider only whether the Commissioner applied the proper legal

standards and whether substantial evidence in the record supports the decision

to deny benefits.” Audler v. Astrue, 501 F.3d 446, 447 (5th Cir. 2007); see 42

U.S.C. § 405(g). As Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay’s thorough Supplemental

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 12, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-30026 Document: 00511260691 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/12/2010
No. 10-30026

Report and Recommendation explained, see Bellow v. Astrue, No. 2:06-cv-920,

slip op. (W.D. La. Sept. 30, 2009), the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) applied

the proper legal standards, and the documentation provided by Bellow in

support of her contention that she suffered from depression did not make

necessary a consultative psychological or psychiatric examination in order to

fully develop the record. There is substantial evidence to support the

Commissioner’s conclusion that Bellow is not disabled.

AFFIRMED.

2

Case: 10-30026 Document: 00511260691 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/12/2010
### SUBCHAPTER III—RESEARCH
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Dominick Pope, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Tranquility, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:

(a)         designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)         designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements, for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)         evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)         Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)         all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)         any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 10, 2009