alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 705.8 Public hearings. ( a ) If it is deemed appropriate by the Department, public hearings may be held to elicit further information. ( 1 ) A notice of hearing shall be published in the Federal Register describing the date, time, place, the subject matter of each hearing and any other information relevant to the conduct of the hearing. The name of a person to contact for additional information or to request time to speak at the hearing shall also be included. Public hearings may be held in more than one location.
( 2 ) Hearings shall be open to the public unless national security classified information will be presented. In that event the presiding officer at the hearing shall close the hearing, as necessary, to all persons not having appropriate security clearances or not otherwise authorized to have access to such information. If it is known in sufficient time prior to the hearing that national security classified information will be presented the notice of hearing published in the Federal Register shall state that national security classified information will be presented and that the hearing will be open only to those persons having appropriate security clearances or otherwise specifically authorized to have access to such information.
( b ) Hearings shall be conducted as follows: ( 1 ) The Department shall appoint the presiding officer;
( 2 ) The presiding officer shall determine all procedural matters during the hearing;
( 3 ) Interested parties may appear, either in person or by representation, and produce oral or written information relevant and material to the subject matter of the investigation;
( 4 ) Hearings will be fact-finding proceedings without formal pleadings or adverse parties. Formal rules of evidence will not apply;
( 5 ) After a witness has testified, the presiding officer may question the witness. Questions submitted to the presiding officer in writing by any interested party may, at the discretion of the presiding officer, be posed to the witness. No cross examination of any witness by a party shall be allowed.
( 6 ) Each hearing will be stenographically reported. Transcripts of the hearing, excluding any national security classified information, may be purchased from the Department at actual cost of duplication, and will be available for public inspection in the Bureau of Industry and Security Freedom of Information Records Inspection Facility, Room H-4525, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230.
[47 FR 14693, Apr. 6, 1982. Redesignated at 54 FR 601, Jan. 9, 1989 and amended at 54 FR 19355, May 5, 1989; 63 FR 31623, June 10, 1998]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 30, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69664-69665]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26347]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Agency Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the Information 
Collection Request (ICR) abstracted below has been forwarded to the 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for extension of the currently 
approved collection. The ICR describes the nature of the information 
collection and the expected burden. The Federal Register Notice with a 
60-day comment period soliciting comments on the following collection 
of information was published on August 24, 2004, page 52324.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before December 30, 2004. A 
comment to OMB is most effective if OMB receives it within 30 days of 
publication.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judy Street on (202) 267-9895.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

    Title: Office of Dispute Resolution Procedures for Protests and 
Contact Disputes, 14 CFR 17.
    Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0632.
    Forms(s): NA.
    Affected Public: A total of 40 respondents.
    Abstract: 14 CFR part 17 sets forth procedures for filing 
solicitation protests and contract claims in the FAA's Office of 
Dispute Resolution for Acquisition. The regulations seek factual and 
legal information from protesters or claimants primarily through 
written submissions.
    Estimated Annual Burden Hours: An estimated 820 hours annually.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20503, Attention FAA Desk Officer.

[[Page 69665]]

    Comments are invited on: Whether the proposed collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
the Department, including whether the information will have practical 
utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimates of the burden of 
the proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, 
utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to 
minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, 
including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of 
information technology.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 19, 2004.
Judith D. Street,
FAA Information Collection Clearance Officer, Standards and Information 
Division, APF-100.
[FR Doc. 04-26347 Filed 11-29-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
#### § 2.4 Investigational policy.

Consistent with obtaining the information it needs for investigations, including documentary material, the Commission encourages the just and speedy resolution of investigations. The Commission will therefore employ compulsory process when in the public interest. The Commission encourages cooperation in its investigations. In all matters, whether involving compulsory process or voluntary requests for documents and information, the Commission expects all parties to engage in meaningful discussions with staff to prevent confusion or misunderstandings regarding the nature and scope of the information and material being sought, in light of the inherent value of genuinely cooperative discovery.

[77 FR 59305, Sept. 27, 2012]
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 6589** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. HENRY OBILO , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. T. S. Ellis, III , Senior District Judge. ( 1:09

- cr - 00047

- TSE

- JFA

- 1; 1:11

- cv - 01142

- TSE )

Submitted : June 13 , 2013 Decided: June 18, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Henry Obilo, Appellant Pro Se. Lindsay Androski Kelly, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Henry Obilo s eeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of app ealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a pr isoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 32 2, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. S lack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Obilo has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Obilo’s motion for appointment of counsel, deny a certificate of appealability , and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 20, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Smart Active Label Consortium, Inc., (“SAL”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: Smart Active Label Consortium, Inc., Wakefield, MA. The nature and scope of SAL's standards development activities are: (a) To bring smart active label technology into use in a wide range of industries; and (b) to bring together a critical mass of technology suppliers, manufacturers, solutions providers, end-users, standards organizations, governmental bodies, and academic institutions.

Dorothy B. Fountain, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-26203  Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### Herman Drucker, Plaintiff, v. Public Service Interstate Transportation Company et al., Defendants. Anthony Corpolongo, Appellant, v. Public Service Interstate Transportation Company et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Yan Yoorhis, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents and votes to reverse and deny the motion to dismiss on condition that the plaintiff submits to the two examinations within a reasonable time. [See *post,*p. 791.]
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 251

To protect small businesses from increased tariffs and other retaliatory 

actions taken by the United States during a trade dispute. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2003

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To protect small businesses from increased tariffs and other 

retaliatory actions taken by the United States during 

a trade dispute.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN SMALL BUSINESSES 

4 FROM INCREASED TARIFFS AND OTHER AC5 TIONS DURING TRADE DISPUTES. 

6 In any case in which—

7 (1) the United States and one or more other 

8 countries are parties to a trade dispute under a 

9 trade agreement, and 
2

•HR 251 IH 

1 (2) the United States increases tariffs on goods 

2 of such other country or countries or imposes other 

3 import restrictions on goods of such other country or 

4 countries on account of the failure of that country 

5 or countries to come into compliance with the terms 

6 of the trade agreement, in accordance with the find7 ings under dispute settlement proceedings under the 

8 agreement with respect to the dispute, 

9 an importer of those goods shall be exempt, to the extent 

10 provided in section 2, from such increases and from the 

11 imposition of such other import restrictions. 

12 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON EXEMPTION. 

13 The exemption under section 1 shall apply to an im14 porter of goods in a calendar year—

15 (1) if the importer had fewer than 100 full-time 

16 employees (or their equivalents) during the pre17 ceding 2 calendar quarters; and 

18 (2) only for that quantity of those goods which 

19 does not exceed 125 percent of the quantity of the 

20 same goods that are products of the country or 

21 countries referred to in section 1 and were imported 

22 by that importer in the preceding calendar year.

Æ
§ 995.28 Use of NOAA emblem. ( a ) Permission for the use of the NOAA emblem must be obtained by formally requesting such permission from NOAA and the Department of Commerce through NOAA's Office of Coast Survey.
( b ) Use of the NOAA emblem must satisfy an interest of the Department; the use may not result in embarrassment to the Department; there must be no conflict with any trademark rights, as stated in § 995.24(a)(4)(ii) and (b)(3)(ii); and there can be no endorsement or favoritism toward the distributor or value added distributor using the emblem, or other appearance of impropriety.
( c ) Certification under this part does not automatically grant the distributor or value added distributor the right to use the NOAA logo. Use of the NOAA logo without express permission from NOAA and the Department of Commerce will be considered grounds for denial of an application for certification or termination of certification.
( d ) *Emblem use by certified distributors or certified value added distributors of NOAA electronic products.* ( 1 ) After receiving separate, written permission from NOAA and the Department of Commerce as described in paragraph (a) of this section, a CED or CEVAD may use the NOAA emblem in product labeling and advertising materials, but only in conjunction with the phrase “Certified NOAA ENC Distributor” or “Certified NOAA ENC Value Added Distributor,” as applicable, and only after receiving separate, written permission from NOAA and the Department of Commerce as described in paragraph (d)(2) of this section.
( 2 ) If the NOAA emblem is used with products that include other data, clear indication must be provided to the customer indicating that the emblem and the phrase “Certified NOAA ENC Distributor” or “Certified NOAA ENC Value Added Distributor” does not apply to the entire product delivered. Information on the effects of such limitation must be provided to the customer (See § 995.24(a)(4) and (5) and (b)(3) and (4).)
Order entered December 14, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01162-CV

JOHN DAVID ADAMS, Appellant

V.

STARSIDE CUSTOM BUILDERS, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416-01104-2015

ORDER

We GRANT appellee’s December 10, 2015 unopposed motion for an extension of time 

to file a brief. Appellee shall file a brief by JANUARY 4, 2016. We caution appellee that no 

further extension will be granted in this accelerated appeal absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 30, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 69583]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26393]



[[Page 69583]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Integrated Resource Contracts FS-2400-13 and FS-2400-13T

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice; comment period reopened.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Forest Service published, on October 5, 2004 (69 FR 
59577), a notice of interim contracts and request for comments on the 
Integrated Resource Contracts, FS 2400-13, for use when timber products 
are measured after harvest, and FS-2400-13T, for use when timber 
products are measured before harvest. The deadline for submitting 
written comments was November 4, 2004. The Forest Service published, on 
October 12, 2004 (69 FR 60608), a correction clarifying that the 
interim contracts became effective immediately upon publication of the 
original notice in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Fitzgerald, Forest Management 
Staff, (202) 205-1753, Lathrop Smith, Forest Management Staff, (202) 
205-0858, or Don Benner, Forest Management Staff, (202-205-0855).

DATES: Comments must be received in writing on or before February 28, 
2005.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments by mail to USDA Forest Service, 
Director Forest Management, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Mail Stop 
1103, Washington, DC 20250-0003; via e-mail to: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6d040319080a1f0c1908091f081e02181f0e080e0203191f0c0e191e2d0b1e430b080943181e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="aac3c4decfcdd8cbdecfced8cfd9c5dfd8c9cfc9c5c4ded8cbc9ded9eaccd984cccfce84dfd9">[email protected]</span></a>; or via facsimile to (202) 205-
1045. Comments may also be submitted via the World Wide Web Internet 
Web site at: http://www.regulations.gov. All comments including names 
and addresses when provided are placed in the record and are available 
for public inspection and copying. The Integrated Resource Contracts 
are available for public review on the Forest Service World Wide Web/
Internet site at: http: //www.fs.fed.us/forestmanagement/projects/
stewardship/contracts. Alternatively, these can be viewed in the office 
of the Director of Forest Management, Third Floor, Northwest Wing, 
Yates Building, 201 14th Street, SW., Washington, DC. Visitors are 
encouraged to call ahead to (202) 205-0893 to facilitate entry into the 
building.

    Dated: November 3, 2004.
Gloria Manning,
Acting Deputy Chief, National Forest System.
[FR Doc. 04-26393 Filed 11-29-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
---

---

# Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of ACRO Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Yami Tarsi, the Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 9, 2006

|/s/ Yami Tarsi
Yami TarsiChief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 



---

---
### Part C—Nuclear Security
1

Assessing	the	Effect	of	Five	Gasoline	Properties	on	Exhaust	Emissions	from	LightDuty	Vehicles	certified	to	Tier-2	Standards

Analysis	of	Data	from	EPA	Phase	3

(EPAct/V2/E-89)

Appendix	H.5

Final	Model	Fitting

Carbon	Monoxide (CO)	(Bag	3)

No. Observations: 956

No. Vehicles: 15 

No. censored measurements: 0

No. missing measurements: 0

No. measurements removed: 0

Model Type: Mixed model
2

H.5.1			Model	fitting	with	respect	to	the	11-term	design	model.

Design Model (11-terms): Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) vs. number of terms in model (p) 

for all possible models respecting hierarchy. 

Design Model (11-terms): Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) vs. number of terms in model (p) 

for all possible models respecting hierarchy (CLOSEUP of previous figure). 
3

Design Model (11-terms): Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) vs. number of terms in model (p) 

for all possible models respecting hierarchy (CLOSEUP of previous figure).
4

CO (Bag 3): Number of terms (p), Goodness-of-fit (BIC) and terms included in the 35 best-fitting 

candidate models (out of a total of 294 possible models with hierarchy). (Terms included in models 

ranked 1-6 comprise the “superset” for final model-fitting).
5

Models fit for CO (Bag 3): (all models include an intercept term).

Model Term Notation Model

Superset SM31

etOH Ze ● ●

Arom Za ● ●

RVP Zr ● ●

T50 Z5 ● ×

T90 Z9 ● ●

etOH × etOH ZZee --- ---

T50 × T50 ZZ55 --- ---

etOH × Arom ZZea ● ×

etOH × RVP ZZer --- ---

etOH × T50 ZZe5 --- ---

etOH × T90 ZZe9 ● ×

1 Represents “Superset minus 3,” etc.

CO (Bag 3): Model fitting history, starting with the 8-term superset model.

Fit Parameters Test with respect to

Previous Model

Model p -2lnL BIC

1 Dev. d Pr>χ2

Superset 8 1182.918 1209.999

SM3

2

5 1184.850 1203.806 1.931 3 0.587

1 A lower value indicates a better fit.

2 Best fit with respect to the 11-term design model.
6

CO (Bag 3): Coefficients and Tests of Effect for the Superset and Reduced Models, with respect to 

the 11-term design model.
7

H.5.2 Model	Fitting	with	respect	to	the	16-term	extended	Model.

Extended Model (16-terms): Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) vs. number of terms in model 

(p) for all possible models respecting hierarchy. 

Extended Model (16-terms): Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) vs. number of terms in model 

(p) for subset of models respecting hierarchy (CLOSEUP of previous figure).
8

Extended Model (16-terms): Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) vs. number of terms in model 

(p) for subset of models respecting hierarchy (CLOSEUP of previous figure).
9

CO (Bag 3): Number of terms (p), Goodness-of-fit (BIC) and terms included in the 35 best-fitting 

candidate models (out of a total of 2,964 possible models with hierarchy). (Terms included in 

models ranked 1-6 comprise the “superset” for final model-fitting).

NOTE: The results of model fitting for the extended model are identical to those for the design 

model, as presented above.