alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC APPROVES PILOT PROGRAM FOR CO-60 PRODUCTION 

AT HOPE CREEK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has approved a license amendment request 

from PSEG Nuclear for a pilot program to explore the production of Cobalt-60 at the Hope 

Creek Generating Station, located about 18 miles southeast of Wilmington, Del. 

The amended Hope Creek license gives PSEG permission to generate and transfer 

Cobalt-60 under the NRC’s regulations for “byproduct” material. Cobalt-60, as a radioactive 

material licensed by the NRC and Agreement States, is used in applications such as cancer 

treatment and sterilization of foods and medical devices. 

The amended license allows PSEG to alter the reactor’s core by inserting up to 12 

modified fuel assemblies containing rods filled with Cobalt-59, which would absorb neutrons 

during reactor operation and become Cobalt-60. PSEG’s pilot program will gather data to verify 

that the modified fuel assemblies perform satisfactorily in service prior to use on a production 

basis. PSEG plans to insert the modified assemblies during Hope Creek’s planned fall 2010 

refueling outage. 

 The NRC staff approved the amendment after evaluating the potential effects of the 

modified fuel assemblies on plant operation and accident scenarios. The staff concluded the 

modified core will continue to meet the agency’s safety requirements. 

The agency issued a Federal Register notice on March 2 

(http://www.access.gpo.gov/su_docs/fedreg/a100302c.html ), offering an opportunity to 

comment or request a hearing on the license amendment request. No hearing requests were 

submitted, but members of the public offered several comments that the staff addressed in the 

amendment’s safety evaluation. The public version of the safety evaluation will be available on 

the NRC’s website by entering ML102710156 in the search engine for the agency’s electronic 

document database here: http://adamspublic.nrc.gov/fnopenclient/ . 

### 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-182 October 8, 2010
News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
#### § 970.600 General.

Several provisions in the Act relate to appropriate mining techniques or mining efficiency. These raise what could be characterized as resource development issues. In particular, under section 103(a)(2)(D) of the Act, the applicant will select the size and location of the area of an exploration plan, which will be approved unless the Administrator finds that the area is not a “logical mining unit.” Also, pursuant to section 108 of the Act the applicant's exploration plan and the terms, conditions and restrictions of each license must be designed to ensure diligent development. In addition, for the purpose of conservation of natural resources, section 110 of the Act provides that each license is to contain, but only as needed, terms, conditions, and restrictions which have due regard for the prevention of waste and the future opportunity for the commercial recovery of the unrecovered balance of the resources.
#### Irving Garfinkel v. Irving Cooper, Doing Business as Cooper Woodcraft Co., et al.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs. Present — Peck, P. J., Cohn, Callahan, Bastow and Rabin, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Ronald J. Sadness, Appellant, against Vernon A. Morhous, as Warden of Great Meadow Prison, Respondent.

Present — Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ. [See *post,*p. 702.]
#### § 1018.35 Termination of membership.

Advisory committee membership may be terminated at any time upon a determination by the Commission that such action is appropriate.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 228 (Monday, November 29, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 69369]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26282]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than December 13, 2004.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Sue Costello, Vice President) 
1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30303:
    1. Evan R. Marbin, as trustee of the SEE Trust, Miami, Florida; to 
acquire additional voting shares of Transatlantic Bank, Miami, Florida.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 22, 
2004.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 04-26282 Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2140

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 

amounts received as damages (including punitive damages) on account 

of age discrimination. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 15, 2003

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude 

from gross income amounts received as damages (including punitive damages) on account of age discrimination.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXCLUSION FOR AMOUNTS RECEIVED AS DAM4 AGES (INCLUDING PUNITIVE DAMAGES) ON 

5 ACCOUNT OF AGE DISCRIMINATION. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 104 of 

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to compensa8 tion for injuries or sickness) is amended by striking ‘‘and’’ 

9 at the end of paragraph (4), by striking the period at the 
2

•HR 2140 IH 

1 end of paragraph (5) and inserting ‘‘; and’’, and by insert2 ing after paragraph (5) the following new paragraph: 

3 ‘‘(6) the amount of any damages (including pu4 nitive damages) received (whether by suit or agree5 ment and whether as lump sums or as periodic pay6 ments) on account of age discrimination.’’

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) shall apply to amounts received after the 

9 date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### Elizabeth Helm, Respondent, v. Maryland Casualty Company, Appellant.

Present — Taylor, P. J., Love, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 99.1**ANNUAL STATEMENT SERVICER’S CERTIFICATEVW CREDIT, INC.VOLKSWAGEN CREDIT AUTO MASTER OWNER TRUST, SERIES 2005-1     The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of VW Credit, Inc. (“VCI”, or the“Servicer”), pursuant to the Amended and Restated Trust Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as ofAugust 11, 2005 (as amended or supplemented, or otherwise modified and in effect from time to time,the “Agreement”), by and among Volkswagen Credit Auto Master Owner Trust, as Trust, VolkswagenDealer Finance, LLC, as Transferor, and VW Credit, Inc., as Servicer, do hereby certify that: 1. VCI is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Agreement.  2. The undersigned is a servicing officer and is duly authorized pursuant to the Agreementto execute and deliver this Certificate to the Rating Agencies, the Owner Trustee, theIndenture Trustee, any Agent and any Enhancement Providers.  3. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January 1, 2007through December 31, 2007 and of its performance under the Agreement was conducted under mysupervision.  4. Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge, performed in allmaterial respects its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate on behalf of theServicer this eighteenth day of March, 2008.      Name:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Medical International Technology, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michel Bayouk, Secretary and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

\s\             Michel BayoukMichel BayoukSecretary and Principal Accounting Officer February 3, 2004

----
| + NASA Homepage+ NASA en Español+ Marte en Español+ Mars Home+ MER Home**Fact Sheets** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
### Part V—Programs Relating to Breast Health and Cancer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6303
DEVERAL WITHERS, a/k/a Deveral Whithers, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus R. M. WUERGLER, Lieutenant, Defendant - Appellee, andBEDFORD SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, Bedford Regional Annex, Defendants.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Magistrate Judge. (CA-97-511-R) Submitted: May 19, 1998 Decided: June 3, 1998 Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Deveral Withers, Appellant Pro Se. William Carrington Thompson, Chatham, Virginia, for Appellee.* The parties consented to jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c) (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). 2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. * We have reviewedthe record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Withers v. Bedford Sheriff's Dep't, , No. CA-97-511-R (W.D. Va. Feb. 11, 1998). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### §12912. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this chapter $150,000,000 for fiscal year 1993 and $156,300,000 for fiscal year 1994.

(Pub. L. 101–625, title VIII, §863, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4384; Pub. L. 102–550, title VI, §606(b), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3806.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–550 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this chapter $75,000,000 for fiscal year 1991, and $156,500,000 for fiscal year 1992."
January 10, 2006


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 - Fifth Street - N.W.
Washington, DC  20549

Re:	Power of Attorney - George J. Harad

Ladies and Gentlemen:

This letter authorizes the following representatives of The Clorox Company,
acting singly, to execute and file with you on my behalf future Forms 3,
4 and 5 respecting my holdings of equity securities of The Clorox Company:

Laura Stein, Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary
Angela Hilt, Senior Corporate Counsel
Cheryl Brice, Assistant Secretary

Sincerley,


/s/ George J. Harad
Name:	George J. Harad
Title:	Director
V 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2554

For the relief of Junior Anthony Francis. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 19, 2003

Mr. VAN HOLLEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

For the relief of Junior Anthony Francis.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF GROUNDS FOR REMOVAL OF, DE4 NIAL OF ADMISSION TO, JUNIOR ANTHONY 

5 FRANCIS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding sections 212(a) 

7 and 237(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Jun8 ior Anthony Francis may not be removed from the United 

9 States, or denied admission to the United States, by rea10 son of any act of his that is a ground for removal or denial 

11 of admission and is reflected in the records of the Depart12 ment of Homeland Security, or the Visa Office of the De-
2

•HR 2554 IH 

1 partment of State, on the date of the enactment of this 

2 Act. 

3 (b) RESCISSION OF OUTSTANDING ORDER OF RE4 MOVAL.—The Secretary of Homeland Security shall re5 scind any outstanding order of removal, or any finding of 

6 inadmissibility or deportability, that has been entered 

7 against Junior Anthony Francis by reason of any act de8 scribed in subsection (a). 

9 (c) ESTABLISHMENT OF GOOD MORAL CHAR10 ACTER.—Notwithstanding section 101(f) of the Immigra11 tion and Nationality Act, any act described in subsection 

12 (a) may not be considered in determining whether Junior 

13 Anthony Francis is, or during any period has been, a per14 son of good moral character for purposes of the Immigra15 tion and Nationality Act.

Æ
#### Frederick Pring, Appellant, *v.*Richard C. Thorp, Respondent.

*Blander*— *Mil of particulars.*

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 24th day of November, 1914, directing the plaintiff to serve a biff of particulars.

Per Curiam:

The action is for damages for slander alleged to have been uttered by defendant “during the months of August, September and October, 1912, * * * in the presence and hearing of divers persons.’’ The order appealed from requires plaintiff to furnish particulars, (a) of each and all of the times and places during the months named when plaintiff claims and expects to prove that the slanderous words were uttered, and (b) the names of the persons in whose presence and hearing the plaintiff claims and expects to prove such utterances. As to the second item it will be sufficient if plaintiff is required to state the name of one person who was present on each occasion *(Rowe*v. Washburne, 62 App. Div. 131) and the order will be modified accordingly. As to the times and places of utterance the defendant is clearly entitled to be advised in advance of the trial and is, therefore, entitled to the particulars sought. If, as may be the case, the plaintiff is not now able to state the times and places with particularity he will be entitled to examine the defendant and to prove by him at what times and places he used the words complained of. *(Ball*v. *Evening Post Pub.*Co., 48 Hun, 149-151.) It will be necessary upon the trial for plaintiff to prove, as part of his case, the times and places of utterance, and he may, consequently, examine defendant for the purpose of proving the facts by him. The order will be modified as above suggested and as modified affirmed, without costs to either party. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowiing and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order modified as directed in opinion, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Order to be settled on notice.
### SUBCHAPTER III—EXISTING FACILITIES
### §11502. Evaluation and reporting requirements

Not later than the close of the 4th calendar year after the year in which the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development first designates areas as enterprise zones pursuant to the amendments made by section 834 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992, and at the close of each 4th calendar year thereafter, the Secretary shall prepare and submit to the Congress a report on the effects of such designation in accomplishing the purposes of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 100–242, title VII, §702, Feb. 5, 1988, 101 Stat. 1961; Pub. L. 102–550, title VIII, §834(b), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3855.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 834 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992, referred to in text, is section 834 of Pub. L. 102–550, which amended this section and section 11501 of this title.

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–550 inserted "pursuant to the amendments made by section 834 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992" after "zones".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Termination of Reporting Requirements

For termination, effective May 15, 2000, of provisions of this section relating to quadriennial submittal of report to Congress, see section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, as amended, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance, and the 10th item on page 106 of House Document No. 103–7.
No: 14-038 June 30, 2014 

CONTACT: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200 

NRC Amends Licensing, Inspection and Annual Fee Rule for FY 2014 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has amended its regulations to reflect the licensing, 

inspection and annual fees it will charge its applicants and licensees for fiscal year (FY) 2014. 

The final fee rule, published today in the Federal Register, includes fees required by law to 

recover approximately 90 percent of the agency’s budget authority. A proposed rule was published for 

public comment on April 14. 

For FY 2014, the NRC is required to collect approximately 90 percent of its appropriation, or 

$930.7 million, through fees assessed to licensees. After the reclassification of a fuel facility licensee 

and other billing adjustments, an estimated $916.7 million is to be recovered through fees. 

Approximately 36 percent of the fees will recover the cost of specific services to applicants and 

licensees under 10 CFR Part 170. The remaining 64 percent will be billed as annual fees under 10 CFR 

Part 171. By law, the NRC is required to collect all fees by Sept. 30, 2014. The money goes to the 

U.S. Treasury’s general fund. 

The increases reflected in the final fee rule are largely a result of increased budgetary resources 

provided by Congress for FY 2014 compared to FY 2013. In addition, the final fee rule includes several 

changes from the NRC’s final fees for FY 2013. The hourly rate increases 2.7 percent, from $272 to 

$279 for FY 2014, and fees charged under 10 CFR Part 170 have been updated accordingly. Annual 

fees for FY 2014 increase over last year for operating reactors, research and test reactors, most fuel 

facilities, material users, and uranium recovery facilities, while annual fees decrease for spent fuel 

storage facilities (at operating, decommissioning and decommissioned reactor sites) and Department of 

Energy transportation activities. 

In comparison to the proposed FY 2014 fee rule, operating reactor annual fees are slightly 

reduced, and some annual fees for fuel facilities have increased due to the reclassification of one fuel 

facility licensee. 

The NRC estimates the FY 2014 annual fees will be paid by licensees of 100 operating 

commercial power reactors, 4 research and test reactors, 23 spent nuclear fuel storage and 

decommissioning reactor facilities, 10 fuel cycle facilities, 11 uranium recovery facilities and 

approximately 3,000 nuclear materials licensees. 

(Note: The Federal Register notice for final fee rule incorrectly provides the accession number 

for accessing the “work papers” supporting the proposed rule in the NRC’s ADAMS document 
Page | 2 

database. The work papers detail the allocation of the NRC’s budgeted resources for each license class 

and how the fees are calculated. The correct ADAMS accession number for the final fee rule work 

papers is ML14148A062. A correction will be published in the Federal Register.)
No: 13-101 December 5, 2013

CONTACT: Holly Harrington, 301-415-8200 

NRC Chairman Meets with U.S. Ambassador, Japanese Nuclear Regulators

TOKYO – U.S Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chairman Allison Macfarlane briefed 

Ambassador Caroline Kennedy Thursday on the NRC’s Fukushima work, and met with the head of the 

Japanese nuclear regulator to discuss Japan’s efforts to address problems at the site in northeast Japan.

Macfarlane noted the extensive NRC and U.S. government assistance provided both to the 

U.S. Embassy in Tokyo and to the Japanese government in the immediate aftermath of the 2011 

accident. Macfarlane and Kennedy discussed a number of the challenges the Japanese government 

faces with efforts to decommission and decontaminate the Fukushima site, as well as the important role 

played by the Japanese Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA).

“We will continue to offer support to our Japanese colleagues,” said Macfarlane. “And we will 

continue to make note of our view that a strong, independent and well-funded regulator is important in 

making independent and authoritative decisions.”

During her brief stop in Tokyo, Macfarlane met with her counterpart, NRA Chairman Shunichi 

Tanaka, and several of his colleagues, as well as others in the Japanese government.

Her talks with Tanaka touched on the variety of challenges ahead at the Fukushima site centered 

around the clean-up effort. She also noted the recent approval by Japan’s government to merge the 

Japan Nuclear Energy Safety (JNES) organization into the NRA, providing the NRA with greater 

technical background.

During her brief visit Macfarlane also addressed a conference on nuclear fuel issues organized 

by the Asahi Shimbun newspaper and Princeton University. She told the conference she believes 

inadequate attention is paid to the back of the nuclear fuel cycle, and the ultimate disposal of spent fuel 

should be considered before the first shovel of dirt is turned for a nuclear facility.

Before departing, Macfarlane was scheduled to meet with journalists from Japanese and 

Western media outlets.