alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 842.904 Conditions for coverage in secondary positions. ( a ) An employee's service in a position that has been determined by the Secretary of the Department of Energy to be a secondary nuclear materials courier position following 3 years of service in a primary nuclear materials courier position is covered under the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 8412(d) if all of the following criteria are met: ( 1 ) The employee is transferred directly (i.e., without a break in service exceeding 3 days) from a primary position to a secondary position; and
( 2 ) If applicable, the employee has been continuously employed in secondary positions since transferring from a primary position without a break in service exceeding 3 days, except that a break in employment in secondary positions which begins with an involuntary separation (not for cause), within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 8414(b)(1)(A), is not considered in determining whether the service in secondary positions is continuous for this purpose.
( b ) An employee who is not in a primary position, nor covered while in a secondary position, and who is detailed or temporarily promoted to a secondary position is not covered under the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 8412(d).
No: 13-088 October 24, 2013

CONTACT: Maureen Conley, 301-415-8200 

NRC Issues Possession License to U.S. Army 

for Depleted Uranium at Hawaiian Bases

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission yesterday issued a license to the U.S. Army authorizing 

the possession of depleted uranium (DU) at two sites in Hawaii. The Army trained with the Davy 

Crockett weapons system at the two sites in the 1960s. This system included DU “spotting rounds,” 

used to assist with targeting accuracy.

The license allows the Army to possess up to 275 pounds of DU at Schofield Barracks on Oahu 

and the Pohakuloa Training Area on the island of Hawaii. It provides for NRC inspections and requires 

the Army to implement a radiation safety plan and a physical security plan. The Army must also 

provide an air and plant sampling plan for NRC review within 90 days. The NRC must review 

sampling results before deciding whether to lift existing restrictions on activities that would disturb the 

DU. The license does not authorize the Army to use the DU or decommission the sites without 

additional review and approval by the NRC.

A license allowing the Army to manufacture and distribute the DU spotting rounds, issued by 

the NRC’s predecessor, the Atomic Energy Commission, expired in 1978. Under the earlier license, the 

Army distributed the spotting rounds to a number of Army installations for testing, training and 

deployment. Each round contained about six ounces of DU. The Army told the NRC in November 2006 

it had discovered DU fragments at the Schofield Barracks. Following that discovery, the Army 

reviewed old records and determined the Davy Crockett system was tested at other installations. 

The Army has enough DU at these sites that, under the Atomic Energy Act and NRC 

regulations, it is required to have a possession license. The Army submitted a license application in 

November 2008. The initial license covers only the DU at the Hawaiian sites. In the future, the Army 

plans to amend the license to address DU at the other sites. They include Forts Benning and Gordon 

(Georgia); Forts Campbell and Knox (Kentucky); Fort Carson (Colorado); Fort Hood (Texas); Fort 

Lewis, currently called Joint Base Lewis-McChord, and the Yakima Training Center (Washington); 

Fort Bragg (North Carolina); Fort Polk (Louisiana); Fort Sill (Oklahoma); Fort Jackson (South 

Carolina); Fort Hunter Liggett (California); Fort Greeley (Alaska); Fort Dix (New Jersey); and Fort 

Riley (Kansas).
### subpart 3—national laboratories centers of excellence in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**








**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**





I,
      Carl
      A. Chase, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
      Edgeline Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September
      30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form
      10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
      results of operations of Edgeline Holdings, Inc.





Date:
      November 19, 2007














By:
      _/s/  Carl A. Chase___________________


Carl A. Chase


Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
### §1320d–8. Processing payment transactions by financial institutions

To the extent that an entity is engaged in activities of a financial institution (as defined in section 3401 of title 12), or is engaged in authorizing, processing, clearing, settling, billing, transferring, reconciling, or collecting payments, for a financial institution, this part, and any standard adopted under this part, shall not apply to the entity with respect to such activities, including the following:

(1) The use or disclosure of information by the entity for authorizing, processing, clearing, settling, billing, transferring, reconciling or collecting, a payment for, or related to, health plan premiums or health care, where such payment is made by any means, including a credit, debit, or other payment card, an account, check, or electronic funds transfer.

(2) The request for, or the use or disclosure of, information by the entity with respect to a payment described in paragraph (1)—

(A) for transferring receivables;

(B) for auditing;

(C) in connection with—

(i) a customer dispute; or

(ii) an inquiry from, or to, a customer;

(D) in a communication to a customer of the entity regarding the customer's transactions, payment card, account, check, or electronic funds transfer;

(E) for reporting to consumer reporting agencies; or

(F) for complying with—

(i) a civil or criminal subpoena; or

(ii) a Federal or State law regulating the entity.

(Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XI, §1179, as added Pub. L. 104–191, title II, §262(a), Aug. 21, 1996, 110 Stat. 2030.)
§ 995.15 Termination of certification. ( a ) In the event that NOAA determines that a CED or CEVAD is not meeting the requirements described in this part, the Office of Coast Survey, NOAA (OCS) will provide initial written notification of potential termination to the CED or CEVAD. OCS/NOAA will state in its notification to CED or CEVAD that termination of certification is under consideration.
( b ) The initial notification of potential termination will be provided in writing by OCS to the CED or CEVAD, and shall state the reason for the potential termination. Reasons for termination may include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) CED or CEVAD contracts or in any way seeks to transfer the production or redistribution of all or part of the NOAA official data in the product to another entity.
( 2 ) CED or CEVAD fails to, or is unable (in the opinion of NOAA) to carry out its responsibilities as described in this part.
( c ) CED or CEVAD may submit written comments to OCS within 30 days of receipt of the OCS's initial written notification of potential termination, explaining why CED or CEVAD's certification should not be terminated. ( 1 ) The written comments shall be submitted to: Director, Office of Coast Survey, National Ocean Service, NOAA (N/CS), 1315 East West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
( 2 ) The written comments shall contain at least: ( i ) Identification and contact information of the CED or CEVAD;
( ii ) A statement that CED or CEVAD is responding to an initial written notification of potential termination by OCS; and
( iii ) A thorough but concise argument as to why CED or CEVAD believes that its certification should not be terminated.
( d ) The Director of OCS will take all timely written comments into account before taking final action, and in no case will the Director take final action until at least 45 days after CED or CEVAD's receipt of the initial written notification. A decision to terminate by the Director of OCS will state the reasons for termination and respond to all timely written comments submitted. Any final action taken by OCS constitutes final agency action on the matter.
( e ) CED or CEVAD shall notify all recipients of its products that its certification has been revoked, and that the product may no longer be valid for use. In addition, the CED or CEVAD shall provide the dates of non-compliance.
### Part B—Transmission Operation Improvements
**Exhibit 15.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement, as amended (Form S-8 333-107766), pertaining to securities offered under the 2002 Employee Stock OptionPlan of Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. of our reportdated June 13, 2007, with respectto the consolidated financial statements of Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. and itssubsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2006.                                                          /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers   Taichung, Taiwan   Republic of China    June 18, 2007
No: IV-14-020 August 11, 2014

CONTACT: Victor Dricks 817-200-1128

Lara Uselding 817-200-1519

NRC Schedules Public Meeting To Discuss Performance of Arkansas Nuclear One

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a public meeting with representatives 

from Entergy Operations, Inc. on Sept. 3 to discuss the agency’s safety assessment of Arkansas 

Nuclear One. The plant is located in Russellville, Ark. 

The meeting will begin at 6 p.m. at the Lake Point Conference Center, 61 Lake Point Lane, 

Russellville. NRC staff will present their assessment of the plant’s performance, talk about agency 

activities and programs and be available to respond to questions or comments from the public.

“The NRC continually reviews the performance of Arkansas Nuclear One and the nation’s 

other commercial nuclear plants,” said Region IV Administrator Marc Dapas. “This meeting will 

provide an opportunity for a discussion of our assessment of safety performance with the company 

and with local officials and residents who live near the plant.”

Two letters issued by NRC will serve as the basis for discussion. A March 4 letter from the 

NRC Region IV office to plant officials addresses the 2013 performance of the plant during which 

the plant operated safely. A July 29 letter notified Entergy officials that that the plant will receive 

additional NRC oversight because of declining performance.

The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess nuclear 

plant performance. The colors range from “green,” to “white,” “yellow,” or “red” in order of 

increasing safety significance of the issues involved. Performance indicators are statistical 

measurements of plant and equipment performance. The NRC’s action matrix reflects overall plant 

performance and agency response. There are five columns in the action matrix with Column 1 

requiring a baseline level of inspections. A move to another column results in an increased level of 

NRC oversight and inspections.

For all of 2013, the plant’s performance indicators and inspection findings were “green” and 

the plant was in Column 1. On July 29 the NRC notified Entergy officials that both units had been 

moved to Column 3 of the action matrix for the first quarter of 2014 as a result of two “yellow” 

inspection findings that had substantial safety significance. These findings were issued in 

connection with a heavy equipment handling incident that occurred on March 31, 2013.
Page | 2

The most current performance information for Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 1, is available on 

the NRC website. Information for Unit 2 is also available on the NRC website.

The NRC plans to conduct a supplemental inspection to review the plant’s actions to correct 

the performance issue.

Routine inspections are conducted by NRC resident inspectors assigned to the plant and by 

inspection specialists from the Region IV office, and the agency’s headquarters in Rockville, Md.
### §230101. Organization

(a) Federal Charter.—Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States (in this chapter, the "corporation"), a national association of veterans who as soldiers, sailors, marines, and airmen served this Nation in wars, campaigns, and expeditions on foreign soil or in hostile waters, is a federally chartered corporation.

(b) Perpetual Existence.—Except as otherwise provided, the corporation has perpetual existence.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1481; Pub. L. 113–199, §1(a), Dec. 4, 2014, 128 Stat. 2058.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 230101(a) | 36:111. | May 28, 1936, ch. 471, §1, 49 Stat. 1390; May 29, 1953, ch. 85, §1, 67 Stat. 40. |
| | 36:112. | May 28, 1936, ch. 471, §§2, 4 (words before 4th semicolon related to perpetual succession), 49 Stat. 1390, 1391. |
| 230101(b) | 36:114 (words before 4th semicolon related to perpetual succession). | |

Section

Subsection (a) is substituted for the source provisions for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary and executed words.

In subsection (b), the words "perpetual existence" are substituted for "perpetual succession" for consistency in the revised title.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 113–199 substituted "veterans" for "men".
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3549 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3549

  To amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to require Members of 
 Congress to place their stocks, bonds, commodities futures, and other 
                 forms of securities in a blind trust.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 2, 2011

 Mr. Bachus (for himself and Mr. Duffy) introduced the following bill; 
      which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to require Members of 
 Congress to place their stocks, bonds, commodities futures, and other 
                 forms of securities in a blind trust.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Congressional Blind Trust Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT OF MEMBERS OF CONGRESS TO USE BLIND TRUST.

    The Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended by 
inserting after section 101 the following new section:

``SEC. 101A. MEMBERS OF CONGRESS REQUIRED TO ESTABLISH A BLIND TRUST.

    ``(a) Requirement.--Each Member of Congress shall place all of such 
person's stocks, bonds, commodities futures, and other forms of 
securities, including securities held jointly with such person's 
spouse, in a qualified blind trust (as defined in section 102(f)(3)).
    ``(b) Exclusion.--Subsection (a) shall not apply to the financial 
interests or benefits described under section 102(i).
    ``(c) Timing and Extension.--
            ``(1) In general.--Each Member of Congress shall comply 
        with subsection (a) not later than 30 days after taking office, 
        or in the case of a person who is a Member of Congress on the 
        date of enactment of the Congressional Blind Trust Act of 2011, 
        not later than 30 days after such date of enactment.
            ``(2) Extension.--A Member of Congress may file, with the 
        Clerk of the House of Representatives in the case of a 
        Representative or Delegate of Congress and the Resident 
        Commissioner from Puerto Rico, and with the Secretary of the 
        Senate, in the case of a Senator, for an additional 30-day 
        extension to comply with subsection (a).
    ``(d) Civil Penalty for Failure To Comply.--The Attorney General 
may bring a civil action in any appropriate United States district 
court against any Member of Congress who knowingly and willfully fails 
to comply with subsection (a) by the end of the time period specified 
in subsection (c). The court in which such action is brought may assess 
against such person a civil penalty not to exceed $50,000.''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

# DATES:

Written comments should be received on or before December 29, 2004 to be assured of consideration. 

*Internal Revenue Service (IRS)*

*OMB Number:*                         1545-1594.                     

*Regulation Project Number:*                         REG-51520-96 Final.                     

*Type of Review:*                         Extension.                     

*Title:*                         Classification of Certain Transactions Involving Computer Programs.                     

*Description:*                         The information requested in regulation Section 1.861-18(k) is necessary for the Commissioner to determine whether a taxpayer properly is requesting to change its method of accounting.                     

*Respondents:*                         Business or other for-profit.                     

*Estimated Number of Respondents:*                         1.                     

*Estimated Burden Hours Respondent:*                         1 hour.                     

*Frequency of response:*                         On occasion.                     

*Estimated Total Reporting Burden:*                         1 hour.                               ( print page 69447)    

*Clearance Officer:*                         R. Joseph Durbala, Internal Revenue Service, Room 6516, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224, (202) 622-3634.                     

*OMB Reviewer:*                         Joseph F. Lackey, Jr., Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503, (202) 395-7316.                     

Lois K. Holland,

Treasury PRA Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. 04-26268 Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### § 1014.1 Purpose and scope.

This part sets forth the regulations of the Consumer Product Safety Commission implementing the Privacy Act of 1974 (Pub. L. 93-579). The purpose of these regulations is to inform the public about records maintained by the Commission which contain personal information about individuals, and to inform those individuals how they may seek access to and correct records concerning themselves. These regulations do not apply to requests for information made pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (except where such disclosures would constitute an invasion of privacy of an individual).
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 24, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 68437]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26169]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 4891]

Industry Advisory Panel: Meeting Notice

    The Industry Advisory Panel of the Overseas Buildings Operations 
will meet on Thursday, December 9, 2004 from 9:45 a.m. until 3:30 p.m. 
Eastern Standard Time. The meeting will be held at the Department of 
State, 2201 C Street, NW., (entrance on 23rd Street), Washington, DC. 
The majority of the meeting is devoted to an exchange of ideas between 
the Department's Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations' senior 
management and the panel members, on design, operations and building 
maintenance. Members of the public are asked to kindly refrain from 
joining the discussion until Director Williams opens the discussion to 
the public.
    Due to limited seating space for members of the public, we ask that 
you kindly e-mail your information. To participate in this meeting, 
simply register by e-mail at [email protected] before December 3, 2004. 
Your email should include the following information; Date of birth, 
social security number, company name and title. This information is 
required to issue a temporary pass to enter the building.
    For questions, please contact [email protected] or call tel: 
703/875-6872;
    Ms. Gina Pinzino; or [email protected] tel: 703/875-7173 for 
Michael Sprague.

Charles E. Williams,
Director/Chief Operating Officer, Overseas Buildings Operations, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 04-26169 Filed 11-23-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-24-P
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Peter S. Fuhrman, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

      (i) The accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal
quarter ended September 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

      (ii) The information in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Billy Dead, Inc.
(the "Company").

                                       /s/ PETER S. FUHRMAN
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Peter S. Fuhrman, Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.


                                       21