alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. II-12-026 April 30, 2012

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416

NRC TO DISCUSS NFS PERFORMANCE AT PUBLIC MEETING IN ERWIN 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials will meet with management of Nuclear Fuel 

Services in Erwin, Tenn., on Tuesday, May 8 to discuss the results of a licensee performance 

review for the company’s nuclear fuel facility in Erwin.

The meeting will be held at 6 p.m. in the Circuit Court Room on the second floor of the 

Unicoi County Courthouse, 100 N. Main St. in Erwin. The meeting will be open to members of

the public and the news media. NRC officials will provide a brief presentation on the company’s 

performance, followed by a response from NFS management. NRC officials will then be 

available to answer questions from the public about the agency’s oversight and inspection of the 

facility.

The NRC staff assessed performance at NFS during a period beginning Jan. 1, 2011, and 

ending Dec. 31, 2011, in the areas of safety operations, radiological controls, facility support and 

special topics, and those evaluations will form the basis of the meeting discussion. The area of 

safeguards was also assessed, but that area will not be discussed publicly due to the sensitive 

nature of the information. The NRC staff review determined that NFS conducted its activities 

safely and securely, protecting the public, workers and the environment.

During a similar review in 2010, the NRC found that NFS needed improvement in two 

areas, safety operations and facility support. Additional inspections and oversight at the facility 

have since ensured that NFS has met its commitments and performed the necessary corrective 

actions to address the problems.

“Nuclear Fuel Services’ 2011 safety culture performance has demonstrated 

improvements,” wrote Anthony Gody, NRC’s Director of the Division of Fuel Facility 

Inspection, in a letter to NFS. Gody added that the “NRC inspection staff noted that NFS’ actions 

in 2011 were properly focused on safety and were consistent with their improved processes.”

In 2011, the NRC will conduct its core inspection programs at NFS. However, oversight 

beyond the core inspection program will still be required to verify that NFS is complying with its 

previous commitments. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave. NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
A copy of the NRC letter detailing the NFS review is available online in the NRC’s 

Agency-wide Document Access and Management System at http://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/adams.html#web-based-adams. The number to access the document is ML12072A191. 

 

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Guaranty Trust Company of New York, as Trustee, Respondent. John Master et al., Infants, by Albert A. Beregh, Their Guardian ad Litem, Appellants.

No opinion. Present — Peck; P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. [See *post,*p. 1026; 276 App. Div. 842.]
§ 1101.41 Generally. ( a ) *Scope.* This subpart describes and interprets the exceptions to the requirements of section 6(b)(1)-(b)(3) that are set forth in section 6(b)(4). These exceptions apply to: ( 1 ) Information about a product reasonably related to the subject matter of an imminent hazard action in federal court;
( 2 ) Information about a product which the Commission has reasonable cause to believe is in violation of any consumer product safety rule or provision under the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2051, *et seq.*) or similar rule or provision of any other act enforced by the Commission;
( 3 ) Information in the course of or concerning a rulemaking proceeding; or
( 4 ) information in the course of or concerning an adjudicatory, administrative or judicial proceeding.
( b ) *Application to transferred act.* The Commission will apply the exceptions contained in section 6(b)(4) to those provisions in the transferred acts, comparable to the specific provisions in the CPSA to which section 6(b)(4) applies.
[48 FR 57430, Dec. 29, 1983, as amended at 73 FR 72335, Nov. 28, 2008]
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3458 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3458

     To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to ensure the 
   eligibility of eligible professionals practicing in rural health 
     clinics for electronic health records and quality improvement 
                       incentives under Medicare.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 17, 2011

    Mr. Schock (for himself, Mrs. McMorris Rodgers, Mr. Huizenga of 
 Michigan, Mr. Rehberg, and Mr. Walden) introduced the following bill; 
  which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in 
    addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to ensure the 
   eligibility of eligible professionals practicing in rural health 
     clinics for electronic health records and quality improvement 
                       incentives under Medicare.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF MEDICARE EHR INCENTIVES TO ELIGIBLE 
              PROFESSIONALS PRACTICING IN RURAL HEALTH CLINICS.

    Section 1848(o)(5)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395w(o)(5)(A)) is amended by inserting before the period at the end 
the following: ``and, with respect to payment years after 2011, 
includes rural health clinic services (as defined in section 
1861(aa)(1)) furnished by an eligible professional''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF MEDICARE ERX AND QUALITY REPORTING INCENTIVES TO 
              RURAL HEALTH CLINICS.

    Section 1848(m)(6)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395w(m)(6)(A)) is amended by inserting before the period at the end 
the following: ``except that the term `covered professional services' 
shall, with respect to reporting periods for 2012 or a subsequent year, 
include rural health clinic services (as defined in section 
1861(aa)(1)) furnished by an eligible professional''.
                                 <all>
```
IN RESPONSE, PLEASE 

REFER TO: M140915 

 

September 19, 2014 

MEMORANDUM TO: Mark A. Satorius 

 Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Kenneth R. Hart, Acting Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS – NRC ALL EMPLOYEES MEETING, 

1:30 P.M., MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 15, 2014, MARRIOTT 

BETHESDA NORTH CONFERENCE CENTER, ROCKVILLE, 

MARYLAND (OPEN TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE) 

The Commission held its annual meeting with NRC employees to discuss recent 

accomplishments and challenges ahead and to respond to employee comments and questions. 

Following the question and answer period, Sheryl Burrows, President of Chapter 208 of the 

National Treasury Employees Union, commented on the current key issues for the union. 

Additional information regarding some questions asked will be provided via EDO Update or 

other appropriate intra-agency medium. 

cc: Chairman Macfarlane 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA 

 OIG 

 OPA 

 Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR
Exhibit 10.3



 





EXHIBIT 10.3




Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) has entered into an agreement with each of the
following persons, which is substantially identical, except as set forth below, to the Form of
Employment Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.8.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10
(File No. 1-31650):



Simon Biddiscombe




Ron Cates




Jay E. Cormier




Raouf Y. Halim




Gerald J. Hamilton




Thomas J. Medrek




Wayne K. Nesbit




Thomas A. Stites




The multiple set forth in Section 6(i)(B) of the Employment Agreement for Mr. Halim is three and
the multiple set forth in Section 6(i)(B) of the Employment Agreement for the other persons is two.
EX-10.7



 








Exhibit 10.7



FIRST AMENDMENT

TO

DEALERTRACK HOLDINGS, INC.

EMPLOYEES’ DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN



A. The DealerTrack Holdings, Inc. Employees’ Deferred Compensation Plan, effective as of June
30, 2005 (the “Plan”) is hereby amended as follows:




     1. Section 1.16 is hereby amended by deleting said Section in its entirety and substituting
the following in lieu thereof:




     “1.16 ‘Fair Market Value’ means, as of any given date, (a) if
Common Stock is traded on an exchange, the closing price of a share
of Common Stock as reported in the Wall Street Journal for
such date, or if there is no closing price for the Common Stock on
the date in question, then the Fair Market Value shall be the first
trading date immediately prior to such date during which a sale
occurred; or (b) if Common Stock is not publicly traded, the fair
market value established by the Board acting in good faith.”



     2. Section 2.1 is hereby amended by deleting the second sentence thereof and substituting the
following in lieu thereof:




     “Any person who shall become an Employee during any Plan Year,
and who previously is not eligible to make any deferral elections
under any nonqualified deferred compensation plan that would be
aggregated with this Plan under Section 409A, may elect, no later
than thirty (30) days after the Employee becomes eligible to
participate in the Plan, to defer payment of all or a specified part
of such Bonuses payable with respect to services rendered after the
date of election (and, to the extent set forth in Section 2.2, for
any succeeding Plan Years until the Employee ceases to be an
Employee).”



     3. Section 2.5 is hereby deleted in its entirety.


B. Except as amended herein, the Plan is confirmed in all other respects.



C. The Effective Date of this First Amendment is as of January 1, 2007.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2438

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

115 West Pine Street in Hattiesburg, Mississippi, as the ‘‘Major Henry 

A. Commiskey, Sr. Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 11, 2003

Mr. TAYLOR of Mississippi (for himself, Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi, Mr. 

WICKER, and Mr. PICKERING) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 115 West Pine Street in Hattiesburg, Mississippi, as the ‘‘Major Henry A. Commiskey, Sr. Post 

Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MAJOR HENRY A. COMMISKEY, SR. POST OF4 FICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 115 West Pine Street in Hatties7 burg, Mississippi, shall be known and designated as the 

8 ‘‘Major Henry A. Commiskey, Sr. Post Office Building’’. 
2

•HR 2438 IH 

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the Major Henry A. 

5 Commiskey, Sr. Post Office Building.

Æ
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 1 0

- 3 0 0 2 6 S u m m a r y C a l e n d a r

W A N D A M

. B E L L O W , P l a i n t i f f

– A p p e l l a n t
v
. M I C H A E L J

. A S T R U E , C O M M I S S I O N E R O F S O C I A L S E C U R I T Y , D e f e n d a n t

– A p p e l l e e

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e W e s t e r n D i s t r i c t o f L o u i s i a n a U S D C N o
. 6 : 0 6

- C V

- 9 2 0

B e f o r e W I E N E R , P R A D O , a n d O W E N , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : *
W a n d a M

. B e l l o w a p p e a l s t h e C o m m i s s i o n e r o f S o c i a l S e c u r i t y ’ s d e n i a l o f h e r a p p l i c a t i o n f

o r a p e r i o d o f d i s a b i l i t y a n d d i s a b i l i t y i n s u r a n c e b e n e f i t s
. O n

r e v i e w , “ w e c o n s i d e r o n l y w h e t h e r t h e C o m m i s s i o n e r a p p l i e d t h e p r o p e r l e g a l

s t a n d a r d s a n d w h e t h e r s u b s t a n t i a l e v i d e n c e i n t h e r e c o r d s u p p o r t s t h e d e c i s i o n t o d e n y b e n e f

i t s
. ” A u d l e r v
. A s t r u e , 5 0 1 F

. 3 d 4 4 6 , 4 4 7 ( 5 t h C i r
. 2 0 0 7 ) ; s e e 4 2 U

. S

. C

. § 4 0 5 ( g )

. A s M a g i s t r a t e J u d g e K a t h l e e n K a y ’ s t h o r o u g h S u p p l e m e n t a l U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Octob er 12 , 20 10 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Pursua nt to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion s hould not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-30026 Document: 00511260691 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/12/2010N o
. 1 0

- 3 0 0 2 6

R e p o r t a n d R e c o m m e n d a t i o n e x p l a i n e d , s e e B e l l o w v
. A s t r u e , N o
. 2 : 0 6

- c v - 9 2 0 ,
s l i p o p
. ( W

. D

. L a
. S e p t

. 3 0 , 2 0 0 9 ) , t h e A d m i n i s t r a t i v e L a w J u d g e ( “ A L J ” ) a p p l i e d
t h e p r o p e r l e g a l s t a n d a r d s , a n d t h e d o c u m e n t a t i o n p r o v i d e d b y B e l l o w i n

s u p p o r t o f h e r c o n t e n t i o n t h a t s h e s u f f e r e d f r o m d e p r e s s i o n d i d n o t m a k e

n e c e s s a r y a c o n s u l t a t i v e p s y c h o l o g i c a l o r p s y c h i a t r i c e x a m i n a t i o n i n o r d e r t o f u l l y d e v e l o p t h e r e c o r d

. T h e r e i s s u b s t a n t i a l e v i d e n c e t o s u p p o r t t h e C o m m i s s i o n e r ’ s c o n c l u s i o n t h a t B e l l o w i s n o t d i s a b l e d

. A F F I R M E D

.

2 Case: 10-30026 Document: 00511260691 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/12/2010
No: 15-039 June 29, 2015

CONTACT: Ivonne Couret, 301-415-8200

NRC Receives High Marks for Small Business Contracting

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission received an “A” from the U.S. Small Business 

Administration today for its Fiscal Year (FY) 2014 efforts to meet the federal contracting goal for small 

businesses. This marks the fourth consecutive year the NRC has earned this recognition. 

“The NRC is committed to supporting the nation's small businesses, including those owned by 

women and veterans, and those located in historically underutilized business zones,” said Chairman 

Stephen Burns. “Relying on small business products and services not only helps us accomplish our 

mission, but also supports local communities with jobs and economic development.” 

In FY 2014, the NRC had $245.3 million in eligible contracting dollars. Of that amount, 

approximately 35.5 percent went to small businesses – exceeding the agency goal of 31.5 percent. A 

breakdown of individual agency scores, as well as a detailed explanation of the scorecard methodology 

used by the SBA, is available here.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents 05/01/15 Letter to SEN Thad Cochran and REP Harold Rogers from Chairman Burns re: the Joint Explanatory Statement of ways the NRC can Reduce its Corporate Support Requirements and Improve the Efficiency of the Commission's Internal Processes. Accession Number: ML15100A363 Date Released: Friday, May 8, 2015 Package Contents The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools. ML15100A355 - 05/01/15 Letter to SEN Thad Cochran and REP  Harold Rogers from Chairman Burns re: the Joint Explanatory Statement of ways the NRC can reduce its corporate support requirements and improve the efficiency of the Commission's internal Processes. (3 page(s), 5/1/2015)
            ML15100A377 - 04/30/15 Enclosure - Report to Congress - Reducing Corporate Support and Improving the Efficiency of the Commission's Internal Processes. (7 page(s), 4/30/2015)
            ML15023A579 - SECY-15-0015:  Enclosure 1 - Project Aim 2020, Achieving Exemplary Nuclear Regulation in the 21st Century. (36 page(s), 1/30/2015)
            ML15023A577 - SECY-15-0015:  Appendix A, Recommendations. (12 page(s), 1/30/2015)
            ML15023A580 - SECY-15-0015:  Appendix B, Project Aim 2020 Charter. (3 page(s), 1/30/2015)
            ML15023A581 - SECY-15-0015:  Appendix C, Project Plan, Gap Analysis, and Approach. (6 page(s), 1/30/2015)
            ML15023A582 - SECY-15-0015:  Appendix D, NRC Financial Environment. (6 page(s), 1/30/2015)
            ML15026A086 - SECY-15-0015:  Appendix E, Alternative Scenarios and Landscape Assessment. (22 page(s), 1/30/2015)
            ML15026A091 - SECY-15-0015:  Appendix F, Root Cause Analysis of Process Improvements. (8 page(s), 1/30/2015)
            ML15026A093 - SECY-15-0015:  Appendix G, Outreach Meetings. (11 page(s), 1/30/2015)
            ML15026A095 - SECY-15-0015:  Appendix H, Ranking and Scoring of Strategies. (6 page(s), 1/30/2015)
            ML15026A097 - SECY-15-0015:  Appendix I, Communication and Implementation Plan. (17 page(s), 1/30/2015)
            ML15026A101 - SECY-15-0015:  Appendix J, External Process Evaluation of "Project Aim 2020". (38 page(s), 1/30/2015)
            ML15079A141 - Feedback Report on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Project AIM 2020 Report (Attachment 2). (36 page(s), 3/31/2015)
            ML15100A369 - Ernst and Young Report on Overhead Assessment Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Attachment 3). (39 page(s), 4/30/2015)


Privacy Policy Site Disclaimer
Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance



 




EXHIBIT 10.100




AMENDMENT GAAMD-STAR030707-03 To

PROVIDER MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT




This Amendment GAAMD-STAR030707-03 effective as of the date it has been signed by both parties
(“Effective Date”), between StarTek USA, Inc. (“StarTek”), a Delaware corporation, and AT&T
Mobility LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, f/k/a Cingular Wireless LLC (“AT&T Mobility”),
on behalf of itself and its Affiliates, amends that certain Provider Master Service Agreement dated
January 1, 2002, as amended.



RECITALS




WHEREAS, AT&T Mobility and StarTek entered into a Provider Master Service Agreement on January 1,
2002 (the “MSA”);



WHEREAS AT&T Mobility and StarTek executed Amendment No. 001 to the MSA dated April 1, 2004
incorporating a Statement of Work (“SOW”) to provide services to AT&T Mobility;



WHEREAS AT&T Mobility and StarTek desire to amend the term of the MSA and the term of the SOW;




NOW THEREFORE, FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree
to amend the MSA and SOW as follows:




1. Section IV. “Term” of the SOW is hereby deleted in its entirety and it is replaced with the
following:




“IV. ‘Term’ This SOW shall begin on April 1, 2004 (“Effective Date”) and end on May 31,
2007.”




2. Section 8. “Term and Extension of Relationship” of the MSA is hereby deleted in its entirety
and it is replaced with the following:




“8. Term and Extension of Relationship




This MSA is effective as of March 21, 2002 (‘Effective Date’) and ends on May 31, 2007.”




3. Except as amended by this Amendment GAAMD-STAR030707-03, the MSA and SOW are not otherwise
modified, revoked or superseded and remain in full force and effect.




4. This Amendment supersedes that certain “GAAMD-STARSTAR1A-02 To CALL CENTER SERVICES ORDER
1A” signed by the parties on February 26 and March 1, 2007, which is hereby rescinded.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties execute this Amendment as of the Effective Date.



	 	 	 
	AT&T Mobility LLC

	 	StarTek USA, Inc.
	 
	 	 
	By: /s/ George Foley

	 	By: /s/ Chad A. Thorpe
	 
	 	 
	Printed Name: George Foley

	 	Printed Name: Chad A. Thorpe
	 
	 	 
	Title: ED MI

	 	Title: Regional Vice President
	 
	 	 
	Date: 4/16/2007

	 	Date: March 27, 2007






Proprietary Information

The information contained in this Agreement is not for use or disclosure outside AT&T Mobility, StarTek, their affiliated

companies and their third party representatives, except under written Agreement by the contracting Parties.
#### Emidio Rufo, Plaintiff, v. “John” J. Orlando, Defendant. Anthony J. Orlando, Doing Business as “A. J. Orlando Contracting Co.”, Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Northcrest Gardens Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Present — Cohn, J. P., Breitel, Bastow, Botein and Bergan, JJ.
### §13234. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission authority to approve recovery of certain expenses in advance

#### (a) Natural gas motor vehicles

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission may, under section 717c of title 15, allow recovery of expenses in advance by natural-gas companies for research, development, and demonstration activities by the Gas Research Institute for projects on the use of natural gas, including fuels derived from natural gas, for transportation, and projects on the use of natural gas to control pollutants and to control emissions from the combustion of other fuels, if the Commission finds that the benefits, including environmental benefits, to existing and future ratepayers resulting from such activities exceed all direct costs to existing and future ratepayers. To the maximum extent practicable, through the establishment of cofunding requirements applicable to such projects, the Commission shall ensure that the costs of such activities shall be provided in part, through contributions of cash, personnel, services, equipment, and other resources, by sources other than the recovery of expenses pursuant to this section.

#### (b) Electric motor vehicles

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission may, under section 824d of title 16, allow recovery of expenses in advance by electric utilities for research, development, and demonstration activities by the Electric Power Research Institute for projects on electric motor vehicles, if the Commission finds that the benefits, including environmental benefits, to existing and future ratepayers resulting from such activities exceed all direct costs to existing and future ratepayers. To the maximum extent practicable, through the establishment of cofunding requirements applicable to each project, the costs of such activities shall be provided, in part, through contributions of cash, personnel, services, equipment, and other resources, by sources other than the recovery of expenses pursuant to this section.

(Pub. L. 102–486, title IV, §408, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2881.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of section 408 of Pub. L. 102–486. Subsec. (c) of section 408 of Pub. L. 102–486 repealed provisions of title III of Pub. L. 102–104, formerly set out as a note under section 717c of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.