alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1610.37 Reasonable and representative tests to support guaranties. ( a ) *Purpose.* The purpose of this § 1610.37 is to establish requirements for reasonable and representative tests to support initial guaranties of products, fabrics, and related materials which are subject to the Standard for the Flammability of Clothing Textiles (the Standard, 16 CFR part 1610).
( b ) *Statutory provisions.* ( 1 ) Section 8(a) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 1197(a)) provides that no person shall be subject to criminal prosecution under section 7 of the Act (15 U.S.C. 1196) for a violation of section 3 of the Act (15 U.S.C. 1192) if such person establishes a guaranty received in good faith to the effect that the product, fabric, or related material complies with the applicable flammability standard. A guaranty does not provide the holder any defense to an administrative action for an order to cease and desist from violation of the applicable standard, the Act, and the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 45), nor to any civil action for injunction or seizure brought under section 6 of the Act (15 U.S.C. 1195).
( 2 ) Section 8 of the Act provides for two types of guaranties: ( i ) An initial guaranty based on “reasonable and representative tests” made in accordance with the applicable standard issued under the Act; and
( ii ) A guaranty based on a previous guaranty, received in good faith, to the effect that reasonable and representative tests show conformance with the applicable standard.
( c ) *Requirements.* ( 1 ) Each person or firm issuing an initial guaranty of a product, fabric, or related material subject to the Standard shall devise and implement a program of reasonable and representative tests to support such a guaranty.
( 2 ) The term program of reasonable and representative tests as used in this § 1610.37 means at least one test with results demonstrating conformance with the Standard for the product, fabric or related material which is the subject of an initial guaranty. The program of reasonable and representative tests required by this § 1610.37 may include tests performed before the effective date of this section, and may include tests performed by persons or firms outside of the territories of the United States or other than the one issuing the initial guaranty. The number of tests and the frequency of testing shall be left to the discretion of the person or firm issuing the initial guaranty.
( 3 ) In the case of an initial guaranty of a fabric or related material, a program of reasonable and representative tests may consist of one or more tests of the particular fabric or related material which is the subject of the guaranty, or of a fabric or related material of the same “class” of fabrics or related materials as the one which is the subject of the guaranty. For purposes of this § 1610.37, the term class means a category of fabrics or related materials having general constructional or finished characteristics, sometimes in association with a particular fiber, and covered by a class or type description generally recognized in the trade.
Exhibit 10.2

GREENMAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

June 22, 2007

Mr. David A. Barclay
Senior Vice President and General Counsel
Republic Services, Inc.
110 SE 6th Street - 28th Floor
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Regarding: Promissory Note Dated June 30, 2006 to Republic Services of Georgia,
           Limited Partnership ("RSLP"), a Georgia limited partnership.

Dear David:

Pursuant to our recent discussions, we seek to confirm your agreement that RSLP
hereby agrees to accept seven (7) equal payments of $15,411.30 commencing June
30, 2007 with the final payment due December 31, 2007 in lieu of the lump sum
payment of $107,879.12 as required pursuant to the terms of the above referenced
promissory note.

David, if you are in agreement with the above, please acknowledge your agreement
below and forward this letter back to my attention.


Sincerely,

/s/ Charles E. Coppa                  /s/ David A. Barclay
--------------------                  --------------------
Charles E. Coppa                      Agreed,
Chief Financial Officer               Mr. David A. Barclay
                                      Senior Vice President and General Counsel
IN RESPONSE, PLEASE 

 REFER TO: M150430b 

 May 7, 2015 

MEMORANDUM TO: Mark A. Satorius 

 Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Annette Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS – BRIEFING ON THE STATUS OF 

LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI 

ACCIDENT, 9:00 A.M., THURSDAY, APRIL 30, 2015, 

COMMISSIONERS’ CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE WHITE FLINT 

NORTH, ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND (OPEN TO PUBLIC 

ATTENDANCE) 

The Commission was briefed by an external panel and the NRC staff on the status of actions 

taken by the NRC and industry in response to lessons-learned from the Fukushima Dai-ichi 

accident, including Tier 2 and 3 recommendations from the Near-Term Task Force Report. The 

external panel included Maria Korsnick, Executive Director, U.S. Industry Fukushima Response, 

and Chief Nuclear Officer and Chief Operating Officer, Constellation Energy Nuclear Group, 

LLC; Anthony Pietrangelo, Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Nuclear Energy 

Institute; Jon Franke, Site Vice President, Susquehanna Steam Electric Station; and Edwin 

Lyman, Senior Staff Scientist, Union of Concerned Scientists. 

There were no requirements identified for staff action. 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA 

 OIG 

 OPA 

 Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR
### §2311. Enhanced transparency on interagency contracting and other transactions

The Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall direct appropriate revisions to the Federal Procurement Data System or any successor system to facilitate the collection of complete, timely, and reliable data on interagency contracting actions and on transactions other than contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements issued pursuant to section 4021 of title 10 or similar authorities. The Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall ensure that data, consistent with what is collected for contract actions, is obtained on—

(1) interagency contracting actions, including data at the task or delivery-order level; and

(2) other transactions, including the initial award and any subsequent modifications awarded or orders issued (other than transactions that are reported through the Federal Assistance Awards Data System).

(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3739; Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVII, §1702(h)(11), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2158.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2311 | 41:405 note. | Pub. L. 110–417, [div. A], title VIII, §874(a), Oct. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 4558. |

Section

In the first sentence, the words "Not later than one year after the date of enactment of this Act" are omitted because of section 6(f) of the bill.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 117–81 substituted "section 4021" for "section 2371" in introductory provisions.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Deadline for Revisions in Federal Procurement Data System or Successor System

Pub. L. 111–350, §6(f)(2), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3855, provided that: "The requirement in section 2311 of title 41, United States Code, to direct appropriate revisions in the Federal Procurement Data System or any successor system shall be done not later than one year after October 14, 2008."
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Bonnie L. McNamara, the Chief Financial Officer of id-Confirm, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           the annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of id-Confirm, Inc. for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of id-Confirm, Inc.

Date: March 13, 2006

/s/ Bonnie L. McNamara                  

Bonnie L. McNamara 

Chief Financial Officer 

(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
### SUBCHAPTER VIII—COMMUNITY RELATIONS SERVICE
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 11164 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
CHRISTOPHER ANTONIO WIL L IAMS , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:13

- CR

- 19

- 1

Before CLEMENT, PRADO, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Christopher Antonio Williams has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011 ). Williams h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 29, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-11164 Document: 00512750621 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/29/2014No. 13

- 11164

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, co unsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-11164 Document: 00512750621 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/29/2014
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Tabatha II, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 (the "Report"), I, John Ballard, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/s/John BallardJohn Ballard, President

September 25, 2007
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION





Each of
the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63
of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Horne
International, Inc. (“Horne”), that, to the best of his knowledge and belief,
the Quarterly Report of Horne on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 27,
2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operation of Horne.





Date:
      August 10, 2010
                  By:
                  /s/
      Darryl
      K. HorneDarryl
      K. HornePresident
      and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
      August 10, 2010
                  By:
                  /s/
      Paige
      E. SHANNONPAIGE
      E. SHANNONInterim
      Chief Financial
Officer





This
written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
as an exhibit to such Form 10-Q. A signed original of this statement has been
provided to Horne and will be retained by Horne and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
No: II-14-018 April 8, 2014

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416 

NRC Schedules April 16 Meeting in Eunice to Discuss URENCO USA Fuel Facility

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a public meeting on April 16 to 

discuss the agency’s recent review the URENCO USA nuclear fuel enrichment facility located in 

Eunice, N.M. 

The meeting is scheduled to begin at 6 p.m. in Eunice Community Center, 906 12th St., in 

Eunice. The NRC staff will discuss with company officials the results of the agency’s review of safety 

performance at the plant from Jan. 1, 2012 through Dec. 31, 2013. The discussion will include the areas 

of safety operations, radiological controls, facility support and other areas.

“Although we only do this overall review of the facility’s performance every two years, our 

inspectors make frequent trips to the facility and have ongoing discussions with the company’s 

management,” said NRC Region II Administrator Victor McCree. “Those interactions help ensure safe 

facility operation that protects employees, people living nearby and the environment.” 

In its review, the NRC found no areas needing improvement so the agency will continue the 

normal level of inspection required for a facility of this type. 

The meeting will be open to the public and media, and NRC officials will be available to answer 

questions after the business portion of the meeting.

A copy of the NRC review is available on the NRC website.
**
Exhibit 34.2 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Ernst & Young LLP) 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors 

U.S. Bank National Association 

We have examined management’s****assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment ofCompliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that U.S. Bank National Association (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the U.S.Bank Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform (the “Platform”), for which the Company provides trustee, securities administration, registrar and paying agent services, as of and for the year ended March 31, 2020, except forservicing criteria Items 1122 (d)(1)(i)-(v), 1122 (d)(2)(i), 1122 (d)(2)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(v)-(vii), 1122 (d)(3)(i), and 1122 (d)(4)(i)-(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to theservicing platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance withthe servicing criteria based on our examination. 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the AmericanInstitute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of lessthan all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedureswere limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to ourtests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that the evidence we obtained is sufficient andappropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. 

Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance withthe servicing criteria. 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and forthe year ended March 31, 2020, for the U.S. Bank Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Minneapolis,Minnesota 

May 28, 2020 
**
§ 231.104 Foreign entity of concern. *Foreign entity of concern* means any foreign entity that is— ( a ) Designated as a foreign terrorist organization by the Secretary of State under 8 U.S.C. 1189;
( b ) Included on the Department of Treasury's list of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (SDN List), or for which one or more individuals or entities included on the SDN list, individually or in the aggregate, directly or indirectly, hold at least 50 percent of the outstanding voting interest;
( c ) Owned by, controlled by, or subject to the jurisdiction or direction of a government of a foreign country that is a covered nation (as defined in 10 U.S.C. 4872(d)); ( 1 ) A person is owned by, controlled by, or subject to the jurisdiction or direction of a government of a foreign country listed in 10 U.S.C. 4872(d) where: ( i ) The person is: ( A ) a citizen, national, or resident of a foreign country listed in 10 U.S.C. 4872(d); and
( B ) located in a foreign country listed in 10 U.S.C. 4872(d);
( ii ) The person is organized under the laws of or has its principal place of business in a foreign country listed in 10 U.S.C. 4872(d);
( iii ) 25 percent or more of the person's outstanding voting interest, board seats, or equity interest is held directly or indirectly by the government of a foreign country listed in 10 U.S.C. 4872(d); or
( iv ) 25 percent or more of the person's outstanding voting interest, board seats, or equity interest is held directly or indirectly by any combination of the persons who fall within subsections (i)-(iii);
( d ) Alleged by the Attorney General to have been involved in activities for which a conviction was obtained under— ( 1 ) The Espionage Act, 18 U.S.C. 792 *et seq.;*
( 2 ) 18 U.S.C. 951;
( 3 ) The Economic Espionage Act of 1996, 18 U.S.C. 1831 *et seq.;*
( 4 ) The Arms Export Control Act, 22 U.S.C. 2751 *et seq.;*
( 5 ) The Atomic Energy Act, 42 U.S.C. 2274, 2275, 2276, 2277, or 2284;
( 6 ) The Export Control Reform Act of 2018, 50 U.S.C. 4801 *et seq.;*
( 7 ) The International Economic Emergency Powers Act, 50 U.S.C. 1701 *et seq.;* or
( 8 ) 18 U.S.C. 1030.
( e ) Included on the Bureau of Industry and Security's Entity List (15 CFR part 744, supplement no. 4);
( f ) Included on the Department of the Treasury's list of Non-SDN Chinese Military-Industrial Complex Companies (NS-CMIC List), or for which one or more individuals or entities included on the NS-CMIC list, individually or in the aggregate, directly or indirectly, hold at least 50 percent of the outstanding voting interest; or
( g ) Determined by the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence, to be engaged in unauthorized conduct that is detrimental to the national security or foreign policy of the United States under this chapter.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-15-0146:  Denial of Petition for Rulemaking Requesting Annual Spent Fuel Pool Evaluations (PRM-50-108).

Accession Number: ML14307A691

Date Released: Monday, May 16, 2016

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML14307A134 - SECY-15-0146: Denial of Petition for Rulemaking Requesting Annual Spent Fuel Pool Evaluations (PRM-50-108) (5 page(s), 11/19/2015)
    - ML14307A630 - SECY-15-0146: Enclosure 1 - Federal Register Notice: Petition for Rulemaking; Denial on Spent Fuel Pool Evaluations (PRM-50-108) (30 page(s), 11/19/2015)
    - ML14307A157 - SECY-15-0146:  Enclosure 2 - Letter to Mark Leyse, Petitioner, from Annette Vietti-Cook on the denial of his Petition for Rulemaking (PRM-50-108) Spent Fuel Pool Evaluations (NRC-2014-0171) (1 page(s), 11/19/2015)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
Memorandum July	2,	2014

Subject: Wood	Heater	NSPS	Call	with	Dan	Johnson

From: Gregory	Green,	Director

Outreach	and	Information	Division

Office	of	Air	Quality	Planning	and	Standards

To: Docket	#EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0734

Participants: Gregory	Green

Dan	Johnson

This	memorandum	to	docket	provides	a	brief	summary	of	the	discussion	between	Dan	Johnson,	

Executive	Director,	WESTAR,	and	Gregory	Green.	Mr.	Johnson	called	to	inform	me	of	a	discussion	that	

took	place	on	July	1st between	himself,	Arthur	Marin	of	NESCAUM,	and	Jack	Goldman	representing	

HPBA.	The	discussion	involved	three	issues	in	the	recently	proposed	Wood	Heater	NSPS.	These	three	

issues	are:

1. How	the	final	rule	may	regulate	the	transition	from	crib	to	cord	wood	testing	for	woodstoves.	

2. A	suitable	compliance	schedule	for	grandfathering	the	compliance	certification	and	the	sell	

through	of	the	existing	inventory	of	woodstoves	and	hydronic	heaters.

3. An	initial	standard	for	forced	air	furnaces	since	these	stoves	had	been	previously	unregulated in	

the	past.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the U.S. Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), Timothy S. Jenks, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of NeoPhotonics Corporation (the “Company”), and Clyde Raymond Wallin, Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March  31, 2017, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Quarterly Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 9th day of May, 2017.

 

|                                   |   |                                              |
|----------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
| /S/ TIMOTHY S. JENKS                   |   | /S/ CLYDE RAYMOND WALLIN                     |
| Timothy S. Jenks                       |   | Clyde Raymond Wallin                              |
| President, Chief Executive Officer and |   | Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President |
| Chairman of the Board of Directors     |   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)      |

 

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of NeoPhotonics Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

----
Docket No. FAA - 2016 - 3988 Dir ID 2015 - NM - 130 - AD

**Contacts** 

### . With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person ontacted **D** ate Response **National Bus iness Aircraft Association**  **Eli Cotti** 8/11/15 **Regional Airline Association** 8/11/15 **Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association David Oord**  8/11/15 **Airlines for America Robert Ireland**  8/11/15
### Part C—Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership