alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1500.129 Substances named in the Federal Caustic Poison Act. The Commission finds that for those substances covered by the Federal Caustic Poison Act (44 Stat. 1406), the requirements of section 2(p)(1) of the Federal Hazardous Substances Act (repeated in § 1500.3(b)(14)(i)) are not adequate for the protection of the public health. Labeling for those substances, in the concentrations listed in the Federal Caustic Poison Act, were required to bear the signal word “poison.” The Commission concludes that the lack of the designation “poison” would indicate to the consumer a lesser hazard and that such would not be in the interest of the public health. Under the authority granted in section 3(b) of the act, the Commission therefore finds that for the following substances, and at the following concentrations, the word “poison” is necessary instead of any signal word: ( a ) Hydrochloric acid and any preparation containing free or chemically unneutralized hydrochloric acid (HCl) in a concentration of 10 percent or more.
( b ) Sulfuric acid and any preparation containing free or chemically unneutralized sulfuric acid (H2 SO4) in a concentration of 10 percent or more.
( c ) Nitric acid or any preparation containing free or chemically unneutralized nitric acid (HNO3) in a concentration of 5 percent or more.
( d ) Carbolic acid (C6 H5 OH), also known as phenol, and any preparation containing carbolic acid in a concentration of 5 percent or more.
( e ) Oxalic acid and any preparation containing free or chemically unneutralized oxalic acid (H2 C2 O4) in a concentration of 10 percent or more.
( f ) Any salt of oxalic acid and any preparation containing any such salt in a concentration of 10 percent or more.
( g ) Acetic acid or any preparation containing free or chemically unneutralized acetic acid (HC2 H2 O2) in a concentration of 20 percent or more.
( h ) Hypochlorous acid, either free or combined, and any preparation containing the same in a concentration that will yield 10 percent or more by weight of available chlorine.
( i ) Potassium hydroxide and any preparation containing free or chemically unneutralized potassium hydroxide (KOH), including caustic potash and vienna paste (vienna caustic), in a concentration of 10 percent or more.
( j ) Sodium hydroxide and any preparation containing free or chemically unneutralized sodium hydroxide (NaOH), including caustic soda and lye in a concentration of 10 percent or more.
( k ) Silver nitrate, sometimes known as lunar caustic, and any preparation containing silver nitrate (AgNO3) in a concentration of 5 percent or more.
( l ) Ammonia water and any preparation containing free or chemically uncombined ammonia (NH3), including ammonium hydroxide and “hartshorn,” in a concentration of 5 percent or more.
Exhibit
      32.2


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Tally-Ho Ventures, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the three months period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, Jose
      M.
      Meleth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his
      knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      August 10, 2007













Jose
      M.
      Meleth


Chief
      Financial Officer





33
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Robert A. Morrison IV, the President and Chief Executive Officer of id-Confirm, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           the annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of id-Confirm, Inc. for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of id-Confirm, Inc.

Date: March 13, 2006

/s/ Robert A. Morrison IV                

Robert A. Morrison IV

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
### Part E—Projects of National Significance
NRC NAMES NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AND RESIDENT INSPECTOR AT OCONEE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Atlanta have selected Ed Crowe as the 

senior resident inspector for Duke Energy’s Oconee nuclear power plant, located near Seneca, 

S.C., about 30 miles west of Greenville. The NRC has also selected Gregory Croon as a resident 

inspector at the Oconee site. Crowe and Croon join NRC Resident Inspector Kevin Ellis. 

Crowe joined the NRC in December 2001 as a project engineer in 

the agency’s Region IV Division of Reactor Projects in Arlington, Texas.

Just prior to his assignment to the Oconee plant, he was the senior resident 

inspector at the Farley nuclear plant in Alabama. Crowe was also an NRC 

resident inspector at the Arkansas Nuclear One plant.

Before joining the NRC, Crowe was employed as a contract senior 

reactor operator instructor at multiple nuclear plants. He also worked as an 

instructor at the Comanche Peak plant in Texas for 11 years. 

 Crowe holds a bachelor’s degree in business administration from the University of Texas 

at Arlington and a degree in industrial technology from Western Kentucky University.

Gregory Croon joined the NRC in August 2011 as a project

engineer in the Region II Division of Reactor Projects in Atlanta. 

Prior to joining the NRC, Croon served nine years in the U.S. Air 

Force and 12 years in the private sector conducting research, reactor safety 

analyses and plant systems engineering. Most recently, he served nine 

years with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, including two years as a 

resident engineer in Iraq supporting Operation Iraqi Freedom.

Croon holds bachelor’s and master’s degrees in nuclear engineering from the University 

of Illinois and the Air Force Institute of Technology respectively. He also holds a law degree 

from the University of Louisville.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No: II-13-005

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416 

 January 31, 2013

E-mail: OPA2.Resource@nrc.gov
“Both Ed Crowe and Greg Croon have the knowledge and commitment to carry out the 

NRC mission of protecting people and the environment by helping to ensure the safety of the 

Oconee plant,” said NRC Region II Administrator Victor McCree. 

At least two NRC resident inspectors are assigned to each operating U.S. commercial 

nuclear plant. They serve as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, 

monitoring major work projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. Resident 

inspectors can serve at a reactor site for up to seven years. 

The Oconee resident inspectors can be reached at 864-882-6927.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.
#### In the Matter of Brian D., Appellant, v Kathleen D., Respondent.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[821 NYS2d 544]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Monroe County (Marilyn L. O’Connor, J.), entered March 17, 2005. The order, among other things, dismissed the petition for visitation and ordered that petitioner pay respondent attorney fees in the amount of $8,799.75.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present — Gorski, J.P., Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.
### §7691. Establishment

As part of the Educational Assistance Program, the Secretary may carry out a student loan repayment program under section 5379 of title 5. The program shall be known as the Department of Veterans Affairs Specialty Education Loan Repayment Program (in this chapter referred to as the "Specialty Education Loan Repayment Program").

(Added Pub. L. 115–182, title III, §303(a), June 6, 2018, 132 Stat. 1464.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Offer Deadline

Pub. L. 115–182, title III, §303(e), June 6, 2018, 132 Stat. 1467, as amended by Pub. L. 115–251, title II, §211(b)(6)(B), Sept. 29, 2018, 132 Stat. 3177, provided that: "In the case of an applicant who applies before receiving a residency match and whom the Secretary of Veterans Affairs selects for participation in the Specialty Education Loan Repayment Program under subchapter VIII of chapter 76 of title 38, United States Code, as enacted by subsection (a), the Secretary shall offer participation to the applicant not later than 28 days after—

"(1) the applicant matches with a residency in a medical specialty described in section 7692 of title 38, United States Code, as enacted by subsection (a); and

"(2) such match is published."

#### Publicity

Pub. L. 115–182, title III, §303(f), June 6, 2018, 132 Stat. 1467, provided that: "The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall take such steps as the Secretary determines are appropriate to publicize the Specialty Education Loan Repayment Program established under subchapter VIII of chapter 76 of title 38, United States Code, as enacted by subsection (a)."
#### United Security Corporation, Plaintiff, v. 425 Riverside Drive Corp. et al., Defendants. Sidney Gaynes et al., Appellants; Henry Blumberg et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
§ 1025.15 Time. ( a ) *Computation.* In computing any period of time prescribed or allowed by these rules, the day of the act, event, or default from which the designated period of time begins to run shall not be included. The last day of the period so computed shall be included, unless it is a Saturday, a Sunday, or a legal holiday, in which event the period runs until the end of the next day which is not a Saturday, a Sunday, or a legal holiday. When the period of time prescribed or allowed is less than seven (7) days, intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays shall be excluded in the computation. As used in this rule, “legal holiday” includes New Year's Day, Washington's Birthday, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Columbus Day, Veterans' Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day, and any other day declared as a holiday by the President or the Congress of the United States.
( b ) *Additional time after service by mail.* Whenever a party is required or permitted to do an act within a prescribed period after service of a document and the document is served by mail, three (3) days shall be added to the prescribed period.
( c ) *Extensions.* For good cause shown, the Presiding Officer may extend any time limit prescribed or allowed by these rules or by order of the Commission or the Presiding Officer, except for those sections governing the filing of interlocutory appeals and appeals from Initial Decisions and those sections expressly requiring Commission action. Except as otherwise provided by law, the Commission, for good cause shown, may extend any time limit prescribed by these rules or by order of the Commission or the Presiding Officer.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Action Powersports, Inc., d/b/a Wells Cycle, Inc., and Carl M. Wells, Appellant s

No. 06

- 16

- 00020

- CV v.
1STEL, Inc., Appellee Appeal from the 413th District Court of Johnson County, Texas ( Tr. Ct. No. C201300332 ). Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

bel ow

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

. We furth er order that the appellant s , Action Powersports, Inc., d/b/a Wells Cycle, Inc., and Carl M. Wells, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED AUGUST 5, 2016 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 79A02

- 1710

- CR

- 2574 | March 27, 2018 Page 1 of 2



### MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case.
A TTORNEY FOR A PPELLANT Chad A. Montgomery Montgomery Law Office Lafayette, Indiana A TTORNEY S FOR A PPELLEE Curtis T. Hill, Jr. Attorney General Matthew B. Mackenzie Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana



### I N T H E 

# COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
Bobby Ray Rufus McDonald , Appellant

- Defendant,

v. 

### State of Indiana , Appellee

- Plaintiff March 27, 2018 Court of Appeals Ca se No. 79A02

- 1710

- CR

- 2574 Appeal from the Tippecanoe Superior Court The Honorable Randy J. Williams , Judge Tr ial Cour t Cause No. 79D01-1603- F 5- 33
Vaidik , Chief Judge .
[1] After stabbing his nephew in the leg during a night of drinking and smoking spice, Bobby McDonald was convicted of battery w ith a deadly weapon, a Level 5 felony, and sentenced to the maximum term of six years (to include twoCourt of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 79A02

- 1710

- CR

- 2574 | March 27, 2018 Page 2 of 2

years with Tippecanoe County Community Corrections). He asks us to reduce his sentence pursuant to Indiana Appellate Rule 7(B), which authorizes us to
re vi se a sentence if, after due consideration of the trial court’s decision, we find that the sentence is “ inappropriate in light of the nature of the offense and the character of the offender.” We decline to exercise that authority in this case.

[2] McDonald notes the principle tha t “the maximum sentence should be reserved for the very worst offender,” Appellant’s Br. p. 13, and argues that he does not fall into that class, focusing primarily on his history of mental

- health issues (e.g., ADHD, PTSD, and bipol ar disorder) . While we join the trial court in acknowledging McDonald’s mental

- health problems, his lengthy criminal record places him comfortably in the worst

- offender category. The pre

- sentence investigation report

— which McDonald does not contest

— revea ls five felony convictions, twenty

- two misdemeanor convictions (including six for battery), a habitual

- substance

- offender finding, and at least eight probation violations. In addition, while this case was pending, McDonald committed and pled guilty to Cla ss A misdemeanor domestic battery.

[3] The purpose of 7(B) review is to “leaven the outliers.” Cardwell v. State , 895 N.E.2d 1219, 1225 (Ind. 2008). In light of McDonald’s criminal history , and his commission of yet another battery while out on bond in thi s case, the six

year , maximum sentence for Level 5 felony battery is by no means an outlier.

[4] Affirmed. Barnes, J., and Pyle, J. concur

.
ex10-1.htm


    EXHIBIT
      10.1

    


    Non-Employee
      Director Compensation

    


    Non-employee
      directors are reimbursed for expenses of meeting attendance and will be
      compensated in 2007 according to the following fee structure:

    


    
      	
              Board
                of Directors

            	 
	
                Member
                Annual Retainer

            	
              $35,000
                plus 3,000 shares of restricted stock*

            
	 	 
	
              All
                Committees other than Audit Committee and Executive
                Committee

            	 
	
                Chair
                Annual Retainer

            	
              $10,000

            
	
                Member
                Annual Retainer

            	
              $5,000

            
	
                Meeting
                Fees

            	
              $1,500
                per meeting

            
	 	 
	
              Audit
                Committee

            	 
	
                Chair
                Annual Retainer

            	
              $20,000

            
	
                Member
                Annual Retainer

            	
              $10,000

            
	
                Meeting
                Fees

            	
              $1,500
                per meeting

            
	 	 
	
              Executive
                Committee

            	 
	
                Meeting
                Fees

            	
              $1,500
                per meeting

            
	 	 


    

    


    *Restrictions
      on shares of restricted stock lapse on the one-year anniversary of the grant
      date.

    


    As
      a further
      component of the compensation structure, any non-employee director first
      elected to the Board of Directors after January 1, 2004 will receive shares
      of
      Class A Common Stock subject to restrictions on transfer that lapse over a
      three-year period equal in value to $100,000 based on the fair market value
      of
      the Class A Common Stock on the date he/she is first elected to the Board,
      rounded to the nearest whole share.

    


    In
      addition to receiving the retainer and attendance fees set forth above for
      all
      non-employee directors, the non-Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors
      receives an annual retainer of $200,000 plus an annual equity grant, which
      was
      6,000 restricted shares for 2007.
DOE/NRC FORM 740M

(05-2021)

CONCISE NOTE

DOE/NRC FORM 740M (05-2021)

Public Laws 83-703, 93-438, 95-91

AUTHORIZED BY 10 CFR 30, 40, 

50, 70, 72, 74, 75, 150

MANDATORY DATA COLLECTION

APPROVED BY OMB: NO. 3150-0057 EXPIRES: 04/30/2024

Estimated burden per response to comply with this mandatory collection request: 45 minutes. This information is required to satisfy the provisions of the US/

IAEA Safeguards Agreement. Send comments regarding burden estimate to the FOIA, Library, and Information Collections Branch (T-6 A10M), U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, or by e-mail to Infocollects.Resource@nrc.gov, and the OMB reviewer at: OMB Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs, (3150-0057), Attn: Desk Officer for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 725 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20503; e-mail: 

oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the 

document requesting or requiring the collection displays a currently valid OMB control number.

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

AND 

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

1. Name

 Street Address

 City State Zip Code

2. Attachment To:

A. DOE/NRC 741 B. DOE/NRC 742 C. DOE/NRC 742C

 3. RIS 4. Reporting Period (MM/DD/YYYY)

From Date To Date 

5. Transaction Data

A. 

Shipper's RIS

B. 

Receiver's RIS

C. 

Transaction Num.

D. 

Correction Num. E. PC F. AC

 6. Reporting Date

7A. Line No. 7B. Entry 

Reference 7C. Text of Concise Note

To the best of my knowledge and belief, the information given above and in any attached schedules is true, complete, and correct.

8. Signature (See instructions [NUREG/BR-0006] for provisions regarding confidentiality). 9. Title 10. Date 

WARNING: FALSE STATEMENTS IN THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE SUBJECT TO CIVIL AND/OR CRIMINAL PENALTIES. NRC REGULATIONS REQUIRE THAT SUBMISSIONS TO THE NRC BE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE IN ALL MATERIAL RESPECTS. 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1001 MAKES IT A CRIMINAL OFFENSE TO MAKE A WILLFULLY FALSE STATEMENT OR REPRESENTATION TO ANY DEPARTMENT OR AGENCY OF THE UNITED STATES AS TO ANY MATTER WITHIN ITS JURISDICTION.
## EDOCS

        -  EDOCS Quick Search 
        -  EDOCS Advanced Search 
        -  Definitions 
        -  FAQ 
        -  Commission Documents 
        -  Today's Releases 
        -  Daily Digest 

PreviousNext

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

1995

1994

## 2024

January
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 228 (Monday, November 29, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 69379]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26251]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amendment Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, November 15, 2004, 8:30 a.m. 
to November 16, 2004, 12 p.m., One Washington Circle Hotel, One 
Washington Circle, Washington, DC, 20037 which was published in the 
Federal Register on November 3, 2004, 69 FR 64078-64081.
    The meeting will be held December 9, 2004 to December 10, 2004. The 
meeting time and location remain the same. The meeting is closed to the 
public.

    Dated: November 18, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-26251 Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### § 1203.14 Peripheral vision test.

Position the helmet on a reference headform in accordance with the HPI and place a 5-kg (11-lb) preload ballast on top of the helmet to set the comfort or fit padding. (Note: Peripheral vision clearance may be determined when the helmet is positioned for marking the test lines.) Peripheral vision is measured horizontally from each side of the midsagittal plane around the point K (see Figure 6 of this part). Point K is located on the front surface of the reference headform at the intersection of the basic and midsagittal planes. The vision shall not be obstructed within 105 degrees from point K on each side of the midsagittal plane.
No: II-15-004 February 23, 2015

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416 

NRC Begins Special Inspection at Summer Nuclear Plant Unit 2 Construction Site 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission began a special inspection today of inadvertent damage to 

the containment vessel during construction at Unit 2 of the Summer nuclear plant. 

The Summer site, operated by SCANA, has one unit in operation and two others currently under 

construction and is located near Jenkinsville, S.C., about 25 miles northwest of Columbia. 

During the week of Feb. 9, Chicago Bridge & Iron workers cut some safety-related rebar and 

damaged the containment vessel bottom head while drilling into concrete. CB&I reported the damage 

to SCANA on Feb. 16 and the company reported the event to the NRC. 

“While the actual damage appears to have been minor, we want to make sure we completely 

understand its potential impact and the apparent breakdown in controls that might have prevented it,” 

said NRC Region II Administrator Victor McCree. “We are also concerned about the delay in CB&I 

reporting the issue.” 

The three-member NRC inspection team will review the events and both the CB&I and SCANA 

assessments as well as develop its own independent assessment. The inspectors will also evaluate any 

potential effects on containment vessel integrity, any similar activities and corrective actions. 

The NRC inspectors will spend about a week on site and an inspection report documenting the 

team’s findings will be publicly available within 45 days of the end of the inspection.