alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Hassard Short, Judgment-Creditor-Respondent, against B. R. T. Corporation, Judgment Debtor. Trebuhs Realty Co., Inc., Third-Party Appellant.

*Per Curiam.*

The third party appeals from an order adjudging it in contempt of court for disbursing moneys in violation of the injunctive provision of a third-party order in supplementary proceedings. The judgment debtor was the producer of a theatrical attraction staged in a theatre owned by the third party. Pursuant to an agreement between them, the third party collected the box-office receipts and defrayed the expenses of the production, including rent for the theatre. While any balance was to be paid over to the judgment debtor, there appears not to have been any such balance for some time prior to the entry of the order in question. In other words, the show was not successful at the time and was being carried by the third party in hopes that it would pick up.

The alleged contempt is a continuance of the financial arrangement referred to after the service of the third-party order. The court at Special Term, upon the observation that the box-office receipts were still the money of the judgment debtor, despite the fact that the debtor was not earning or receiving any of it, held that the payments made to defray the expenses of the show were a violation of the order. The court also observed that it was doubtless true that unless the east was paid the show would stop, but that this consideration was hardly a matter for argument, and that the third party decided to prefer other creditors of the judgment debtor over the judgment creditor.

There are two questions in the ease, which in our opinion require more consideration than is possible by summary disposition. One is whether a certain agreement between the parties, by which the judgment creditor was for a while paid the sum of $100 a week, was in satisfaction of the judgment. *632The other is whether under the circumstances the third party’s conduct was contumacious and caused the judgment creditor any damage. One of the essentials to the recovery which the judgment creditor has made, by way of the fine imposed on the contempt order, is a showing of damage. While damage may be shown, it is not sufficiently demonstrated on the record before us.

The order appealed from should be, therefore, modified to remit the matter to an official referee for report to Special Term on the terms and effect of the arrangement between the parties for paying the judgment creditor $100 a week and on the questions of contempt and damages.

Peek, P. J., Glenn on, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ., concur.

Order unanimously modified so as to remit the matter to an official referee for report to Special Term on the terms and effect of the arrangement between the parties for paying the judgment creditor $100 a week and on the questions of contempt and damages. Settle order on notice.
Jonathan B. Hill

T: +1 202 962 8356

jhill@cooley.com

1299 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 700, WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 WWW.COOLEY.COM

February 27, 2014

Mr. Paul L. Gretch

Director, Office of International Aviation

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Room W86-3163

Washington, DC 20591

Re: Additional Codeshare Notice-B6 and JAL-Docket OST-2012-0041

Dear Mr. Gretch:

JetBlue Airways hereby gives notice pursuant NOAT dated April 4, 2012 in Docket OST2012-0041, that JetBlue will place JAL’s code on its flights on the following routings:

SFO-LGB

SFO-BOS

SFO-FLL

SFO-AUS

BOS-HOU

BOS- DTW

Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.

Sincerely yours,

Cooley LLP

Counsel for JetBlue Airways Corporation

Cc:

Carol Gosain, Esq.

Adam Schless, Esq.
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Michael B. Kuknyo, a/k/a Robert C. Holman, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 59438;

First District (2nd Division)

August 6, 1974.

No appearance for appellant.

No appearance for the People.

PER CURIAM.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 224 (Monday, November 22, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67942-67943]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25834]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Commission on English Language Program 
Accreditation

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 22, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Commission on English 
Language Program Accreditation (``CEA'') has filed written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of 
business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature 
and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications 
were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting 
the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: Commission on 
English Language Program Accreditation, Alexandria, VA.

[[Page 67943]]

The nature and scope of CEA's standards development activities are: To 
promote best practices in English language instruction and 
administration in the United States through the development of 
standards, which form the foundation of the accreditation review 
process.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-25834 Filed 11-19-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
prepared for

CENRAP/CENSARAprepared by Gregory StellaJim WilkinsonT.W. TescheAlpine Geophysics, LLCFt. Wright, KY4 May 2006 

Appendix C: 

Area of Influence Data for Each 

Class I Area of Interest

La Sal Mountains and Colorado River Canyon Ups
Class I Areas Relevant to CENRA

Class I Areas Relevant to CENRA

Class I Area ST Name

Big Bend Nat'l Park T

X BIBE

Boundary Waters MN BWC

A

Breton Island L

A BRET

Caney Creek

AR CACR

Guadalupe Mountains T

X GUMO

Hercules Glade MO HEGLMingo MO MINGUpper Buffalo

AR UPBU

Voyageurs MN

VOYA2

Wichita Mountains OK WIMOMammoth Cave KY MAC

A

Sipsey Wilderness

AL SIPS

Isle Royale MI ISLEBadlands SD BADLGreat Sand Dunes CO GRS

A

Lostwood Wilderness ND LOSTRocky Mtn Nat'l Park CO ROMOSalt Creek NM SACRTheodore Roosevlt ND THROWheeler Peak NM WHPEWhite Mountains NM WHITWind Cave Wilderness ND WIC

A

-1000 -750 -500 -250 0 

-1500-1250-1000

-750-500-250

0

250500750

10001250

BIBE1 

GUMO1 

SAAN1

GICL1 WHIT1SACR1

BOAP1

WIMO1

BAND1

SAPE1 ELLI1 CHER1

WHPE1 

MEVE1

WEMI1 GRSA1 

TALL1

CEBL1

WHRI1

WH

RMHQ1 ROMO1 STPE1 MOZI1 WAU

BRLA1 NOPL1 HALS1

WALT1

NIOB1

BRID1 BLMO

WICA1 BADL1 

CLPE1

YELL21

THBA1

NOAB1

NOCH1

THRO1

ULBE1 

FOPE1 MELA1 

LOST1
Boundary Waters-Voyageurs

(green=NO3; red=SO4/EC/OC/CM/FS)
Wichita Mountain

(green=NO3; red=SO4/EC/OC; blue=CM/FS
Breton Island

(green=NO3; red=SO4/EC/OC/CM; blue=FS
Hercules Glade-Mingo WildernessUpper Buffalo-Caney Creek

(green=NO3; red=SO4/EC/OC/CM/FS)
Salt Creek-Guadalupe Mountain-Big Ben

White Mountain-Wheeler Peak

(green=NO3; red=SO4/EC/OC/CM/FS)
Rocky Mountain-Great Sand Dune

(green=NO3; red=SO4/EC/OC/CM/FS)

EC/OC/FS/CM
Theodore Roosevelt-LostwoodBadlands-Wind Cave

(green=NO3; red=SO4/EC/OC/CM/FS)
Sipsey-Mammoth Cave

(all pollutants)
### §11822. Annual report

Not later than 180 days after the end of a fiscal year for which funds are appropriated to carry out this subchapter, the Secretary shall submit to the President, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the President pro tempore of the Senate a report that contains—

(1) a description of the types of projects and activities for which grants were made under this subchapter for such fiscal year,

(2) a description of the number and characteristics of the youth and families served by such projects and activities, and

(3) a description of exemplary projects and activities for which grants were made under this subchapter for such fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 100–690, title III, §3512, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4256.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Termination of Reporting Requirements

For termination, effective May 15, 2000, of provisions of law requiring submittal to Congress of any annual, semiannual, or other regular periodic report listed in House Document No. 103–7 (in which a report required under this section is listed as the 12th item on page 92), see section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, as amended, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance.
6/9/2015 Request for Information ­ BlueChip UAS (FAA­2014­0787)

https://email.dot.gov/owa/9­AWA­AVS­333Exemptions@faa.gov/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAABFvqQJAFf5SI8crGhIsEIyBwD3qfMUO7BCQ74YBi9P12... 1/1

Request for Information ­ BlueChip UAS (FAA­2014­0787)

9­AWA­AVS­333Exemptions (FAA)

Sent:Tuesday, June 09, 2015 4:25 PM

To: clint.stevens@bluechipuas.com

June 9, 2015

Dear Mr. Stevens:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA­2014­0787).

This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

Your petition references the materials listed below, however the material was not submitted for the record. Please

provide a copy of the following referenced materials:

o UAV Factory Penguin B/C User and Maintenance Manuals

Please submit the additional information (non­proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov. Any additional

confidential/proprietary materials can be e­mailed separately to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you do send in

supplemental documents separately, please add a comment on the docket, indicating that you submitted

supplemental information separately.

If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by June 23,

2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

FAA Office of Rulemaking
NRC APPROVES “TIME OFF” AMENDMENT TO ITS

FITNESS-FOR-DUTY REGULATIONS 

The NRC has approved an amendment to its fitness-for-duty rule that will allow nuclear 

power plants to use a different method to determine when employees must be given time off from 

work. The current fitness for duty regulations (10 CFR Part 26), which went into effect in March 

2008, limit work hours to ensure worker fatigue does not affect plant safety and security. The new 

amendment offers an option for how licensees can manage worker fatigue over extended periods of 

time by providing workers with opportunities for sufficient rest.

The fitness for duty regulations require licensees to manage “cumulative fatigue” primarily 

by providing workers with a minimum number of days off within certain time frames. Last year, 

however, two petitions were filed with the NRC raising concerns about the minimum days off 

requirements. The nuclear industry also asked the NRC to allow plants more flexibility in meeting 

the regulations. To gather more input, the NRC held three public meetings on the subject and asked 

for public comments on a proposed amendment in spring 2011. While a minority of those providing 

comments was opposed to the amendment, the NRC also heard from maintenance, operations, and 

security workers, unions, and vendors, who spoke of the unintended consequences of the minimum 

days off requirements. Industry representatives voiced the importance of having more flexibility to 

improve workers’ quality of life and lessen the complexity of the rule. 

The amendment approved by the NRC allows, but does not mandate, an alternative approach 

to the minimum days off requirements. The alternate approach still limits the number of consecutive 

extended work weeks an individual can work, but allows more flexibility in its application. 

The NRC published the final rule, along with background information and public comment 

resolution, today in the Federal Register, and the rule will become effective on Aug. 22. In 

association with this final rule, the NRC’s endorsement of industry implementation guidance is 

available by entering ML11180A261 in the NRC’s electronic document database search engine.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC’s website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-139 July 21, 2011
#### In the Matter of the Application of The City of New York, Appellant, by the Corporation Counsel, for the Appointment of Commissioners of Estimate and Assessment to Ascertain and Determine the Compensation which Should Justly Be Made for the Discontinuance and Closing *of*West One Hundred and Fifty-first Street, etc. Morgan J. O'Brien and Another, as Executors, etc., of Francis Higgins, Deceased, Respondents.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on same ease (149 App. Div. 55). Present—Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Smith and Page, JJ.; Clarke, P. J., dissented on dissenting opinion in that case.
### §13891. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 13891 was editorially reclassified as section 12251 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
#### John H. Stevenson, Respondent-Appellant, v. George E. Illig, Appellant, and St. John the Baptist Roman Catholic Congregation, Respondent.

All concur. Motion to dismiss appeal from judgment dismissing the complaint against *627defendant St. John the Baptist Roman Catholic Congregation denied as academic. (Appeal from a judgment for plaintiff against defendant Illig in an automobile negligence action; also appeal by plaintiff from that part of the judgment which dismisses plaintiff's complaint as to defendant church.) Present— Taylor, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# DATES AND TIMES:

Tuesday, December 7, 2004; 10 a.m. and 3 p.m.

# PLACE:

Washington, DC., at U.S. Postal Service Headquarters, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., in the Benjamin Franklin Room.

# STATUS:

December 7—10 a.m. (Closed); 3 p.m. (Open).

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

 

## Tuesday, December 7—10 a.m. (Closed)

1. Biohazard Detection Systems.

2. Audit and Finance Committee Report and Review of Year-End Financial Statements.

3. Financial Update.

4. Rate Case Planning.

5. Strategic Planning.

6. Personnel Matters and Compensation Issues.

## Tuesday, December 7—3 p.m. (Open)

1. Minutes of the Previous Meeting, November 4, 2004.

2. Remarks of the Postmaster General and CEO.

3. Committee Reports.

4. Fiscal Year 2004 Audited Financial Statements.

5. Postal Service Fiscal Year 2004 Annual Report.

6. Final Fiscal Year 2006 Appropriation Request.

7. Capital Investments.

a. Bethpage, New York, Logistics & Distribution Center.

b. Kearny, New Jersey, Logistics & Distribution Center.

8. Tentative Agenda for the January 11, 2005, meeting in Washington, DC

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

William T. Johnstone, Secretary of the Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 20260-1000. Telephone (202) 268-4800.

William T. Johnstone,

Secretary.

Neva R. Watson,

Alternate Certifying Officer.

[FR Doc. 04-26237  Filed 11-22-04; 4:12 pm]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-M
### SUBCHAPTER VII—REGISTRATION AND VOTING STATISTICS
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b) OR 15d-14(b) AND 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

Melvin L. Flanigan hereby certifies pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.             Heis the Chief Financial Officer of DTS, Inc.

2.             TheForm 10-Q report of DTS, Inc. for the quarterly period endedSeptember 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended.

3.             Theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q report of DTS, Inc. for thequarterly period ended September 30, 2006 fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of DTS, Inc.
| Dated: November 9, 2006 |     |                      |
|-------------------------|----------|---------------------------|
|                    |     |                      |
|                    | By:      | /s/ MELVIN L. FLANIGAN    |   |
|                    |     | Melvin L. Flanigan        |
|                    | * * | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided toDTS, Inc. and will be retained by DTS, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission upon request.

----
### Part B—Energy Assistance and State Programs
Exhibit
10.2


AMENDMENT TO THE


SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED


AIRCRAFT
TIME SHARING AGREEMENT


THIS AMENDMENT TO
THE SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED TIME SHARING AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is
entered into on April 4, 2007 by Cephalon, Inc. (“Owner”), a Delaware corporation,
with principal offices at 41 Moores Road, Frazer, PA 19355, and Frank Baldino,
Jr., Ph.D. (“Lessee”).


BACKGROUND:


The Owner and
Lessee entered that certain Second Amended and Restated Time Sharing Agreement
dated November 1, 2006 (the “Time Sharing Agreement”), and now intend to amend a
portion of Section 3 thereof.


Capitalized terms
used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed
to them in the Time Sharing Agreement.


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the foregoing recitals and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged,
the parties hereto agree as follows:


1.             The second sentence of Section 3 of
the Time Sharing Agreement is hereby amended and restated as follows.


“Lessee’s use shall include the use of the Aircraft by
guests of the Company.”


2.             Except
as expressly modified by this Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the
Time Sharing Agreement shall not be modified or amended and shall remain in
full force and effect.


[THE
REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.]













IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, Owner and Lessee caused the signatures of their authorized
representatives to be affixed below on the day and year first above written.


OWNER:


	
  CEPHALON, INC.

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Carl A.
  Savini

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Name: 

  	
  Carl A. Savini

  
	
  Title:

  	
  Executive Vice President & Chief Administrative
  Officer

  
				



 


LESSEE:


	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Frank Baldino, Jr.

  	
   

  
	
  Frank Baldino,
  Jr., Ph.D.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

CERTIFICATIONSUNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John O.Brooks, certify that:

1. I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Service 1st Bancorp;

2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

          (a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

          (b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision,to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financialreporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes inaccordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

          (c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

          (d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

          (a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

          (b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.