alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3633 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3633

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to repeal the reduction 
  in Medicare disproportionate share hospital (DSH) payments made by 
    section 3133 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 12, 2011

   Ms. Buerkle (for herself and Mr. King of New York) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to repeal the reduction 
  in Medicare disproportionate share hospital (DSH) payments made by 
    section 3133 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Help Our Hospitals Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF MEDICARE DSH REDUCTIONS UNDER ACA.

    Section 1886 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww), as 
amended by section 3133 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care 
Act (Public Law 111-148) and section 1104 of the Health Care and 
Education Reconciliation Act of 2011 (Public Law 111-152), is amended--
            (1) in subsection (d)(5)(F)(i), by striking ``Subject to 
        subsection (r), for'' and inserting ``For''; and
            (2) by striking subsection (r).
                                 <all>
```
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

FULL WRITTEN EXPLANATION

Approval

1. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission voted to close the following meeting:

Monday, October 19, 2015

9:30 AM Briefing on Security Issues (Closed - Ex. 1) 

The Commission voted 4 to 0 on August 12, 2015 to close this Briefing on 

Security Issues which is reasonably expected to involve classified 

information.

Attendance

- NRC Commissioners and members of their staff

- Representatives of Commission staff offices

- Executive Director for Operations and members of his staff

- Representatives of other Federal agencies

Contact Person for More Information

Glenn Ellmers, Office of the Secretary (301-415-0442)

 /RA/

Glenn Ellmers

Office of the Secretary

08/20/2015
### **CHAPTER 93—EMERGENCY ENERGY CONSERVATION**

Sec.
8501.
Congressional findings and purposes.
8502.
Definitions.

#### SUBCHAPTER I—EMERGENCY ENERGY CONSERVATION PROGRAM

8511.
National and State emergency conservation targets.
8512.
State emergency conservation plan.
8513.
Standby Federal conservation plan.
8514.
Judicial review.
8515.
Reports.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—OTHER AUTOMOBILE FUEL PURCHASE MEASURES

8521.
Minimum automobile fuel purchase measures.
8522.
Out-of-State vehicles to be exempted from odd-even motor fuel purchase restrictions.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—STUDIES

8531.
Study and report.
8532.
Middle distillate monitoring program.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS

8541.
Administration.
No: IV-14-006 April 15, 2014

CONTACT: Victor Dricks (817) 200-1128

 Lara Uselding (817) 100-1519

NRC To Discuss 2013 Performance Assessment for Columbia Generating Station

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet in Richland, Wash., April 29 with 

representatives of Energy Northwest to discuss the agency's 2013 assessment of safety performance for 

the Columbia Generating Station. The plant is located 12 miles northwest of Richland.

The meeting, which will be open to the public, is scheduled to begin at 5:30 p.m. in the Walkley 

Room of the Energy Northwest Training Center, 3000 George Washington Way, Richland. In addition 

to the performance assessment, the NRC staff will be available to answer questions from the public on 

the safety performance of Columbia Generating Station, as well as the NRC's role in ensuring safe plant 

operation.

"The NRC continually reviews the performance of Columbia Generating Station and the 

nation's other commercial nuclear power facilities to ensure they are being operated safely," NRC 

Region IV Administrator Marc Dapas said. "This meeting will provide an opportunity for a discussion 

of our annual assessment of safety performance with the company and with local officials and residents 

who live near the plant." 

A letter sent from the NRC Region IV office to plant officials addresses the performance of the 

plant during 2013 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion.

The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess nuclear 

plant performance. The colors start with green and then increase to white, yellow, or red, commensurate 

with the safety significance of the issues involved. Performance indicators are statistical measurements 

of plant and equipment performance. The NRC’s action matrix reflects overall plant performance and 

agency response. There are five columns in the matrix with Column 1 requiring a baseline level of 

inspections. A move to the other columns results in an increased level of NRC oversight and 

inspections.

Columbia Generating Station is in Column 1, the licensee response column of the NRC’s action 

matrix, and will receive the normal level of oversight for the rest of 2014. Inspections are performed by 

two NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant, inspection specialists from the Region IV office in 

Arlington, Texas, and specialists from the agency’s headquarters in Rockville, Md.

Information about the plant’s current performance is available on the NRC web site.
#### § 300.26 Pile fabrics and products composed thereof.

The fiber content of pile fabrics or products made thereof may be stated in the label or mark of identification in such segregated form as will show the fiber content of the face or pile and of the back or base, with the percentages of the respective fibers as they exist in the face or pile and in the back or base: *Provided,* That in such disclosure the respective percentages of the face and the back be given in such manner as will show the ratio between the face and the back. Examples of the form of marking pile fabrics as to fiber content provided for in this section are as follows:

100% Wool Pile

100% Cotton Back

(Back constitutes 60% of fabric and pile 40%)

Pile—60% Recycled Wool, 40% Wool

Back—70% Cotton, 30% Rayon

(Pile constitutes 60% of fabric and back 40%).

[6 FR 3426, July 15, 1941, as amended at 45 FR 44262, July 1, 1980]
#### Margie Marks, Plaintiff-Appellant, *v.*The City of Johnston City, Defendant-Appellee.

(No. 74-1;

Fifth District

August 5, 1974.

*1090Mitchell and Armstrong, Ltd., of Marion, for appellant.

James B. Bleyer, of Marion, for appellee.

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE GEORGE J. MORAN

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff appeals from an order .granting defendant’s motion to dismiss her complaint for personal injuries.

On October 2, 1967, through her then attorney, plaintiff filed a notice with the cleric of the City of Johnston City pursuant to section 8 — 102 of the Local Governmental and Governmental Employees Tort Immunity Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1965, ch. 85, par. 8 — 102). On March 26, 1969, she filed a complaint seeking damages for injuries she had incurred on April 4, 1967, because of slipping on a defective entranceway to the city clerk’s office. Thus her complaint was filed almost 2 years after her claimed injury. The Local Governmental and Governmental Employees Tort Immunity Act (Ill. Rev. Stat., ch. 85, par. 8 — 101) at the time provided that “no civil action can be commenced in any court against a local entity for any injury unless it is commenced within one year from the date that the injury was received or the cause of action accrued.” The appellee filed a motion asking that the suit be dismissed for failure to file within the time specified by law. Appellant responded to this motion by asserting that the appellee was estopped or had waived the 1-year statutory limitation by the payment of certain medical bills, the result of which was to induce the appellant to forgo compliance with the limitation statute. The trial court granted the appellee’s motion and dismissed the complaint.

Plaintiff urges that the trial court was in error in dismissing the suit on the pleadings because the claimed conduct of the defendant estopped it from asserting the statute of limitations as a defense to her cause of action.

 The conduct of a party against whom a waiver of the statute of limitations is claimed must be such as to cause him to change his position by lulling him into a false sense of security thereby causing him to delay or waive his rights. *(Dickirson v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co.,*319 Ill. 311; *Kinsey v. Thompson,*44 Ill.App.2d 304; *Flagler v. Wessman,*130 Ill.App.2d 491, 263 N.E.2d 630.) Here it is apparent that the plaintiff was represented by counsel at all stages of the proceedings. There is no *1091aHegation that plaintiff was lulled into a false feeling that her case would be settled regardless of the period of limitation.

For the foregoing reasons the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

EBERSPACHER and CREES, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF KPMG LLP

The
Board of Directors
Avistar Communications Corporation:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-43944 and 333-63914) on Form S-8 of Avistar
Communications Corporation of our report dated January 16, 2004, except as to Note 3, which is as of February 27, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Avistar
Communications Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in
the two-year period ended December 31, 2003, and the related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Avistar Communications Corporation.

|                                         |  |         
|---------------------------------------- |  | --------
|                                         |  | KPMG LLP
|                                         |  |         
|Mountain View, California
March 12, 2004 |  |         

---

QuickLinks
#### § 1401.6 Effective date.

This part becomes effective February 20, 1978.
EX-10.2



 





Exhibit
10.2 




AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO BLOCK SPACE AGREEMENT




     THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO BLOCK SPACE AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”), dated as of July 30, 2007,
is between Polar Air Cargo Worldwide, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and DHL Network
Operations (USA), Inc., an Ohio corporation (“DHL”) (each a “Party and together, the “Parties”).



     WHEREAS, the Company, desires to amend a term in the Block Space Agreement (“BSA”) dated as
of June 28, 2007 between the Company and DHL, as hereinafter set forth.



     NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:


1. AMENDMENT OF BLOCK SPACE AGREEMENT. The Block Space Agreement amended as follows: In
the first sentence of Section 5.1 of the Block Space Agreement, the phrase “July 31, 2007” is
hereby deleted in its entirely and replaced with “September 7, 2007”.



2. GENERAL. The execution, delivery and effectiveness of this Agreement shall not, except
as expressly provided herein, operate as a waiver or amendment of any right, power or remedy of the
Company, or DHL, nor constitute a waiver or amendment of any other provision of the Block Space
Agreement, Amended Block Space Agreement or for any other purpose, except as expressly set forth
herein. This Agreement and the Block Space Agreement constitute the entire understanding of the
parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and thereof and supersede all prior and current
understandings and agreements, whether written or oral, with respect to such subject matter. The
headings in this Agreement are for convenience of reference only and shall not alter, limit or
otherwise affect the meaning hereof. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts,
which together shall constitute one instrument, and shall bind and inure to the benefit of the
parties and their respective successors and permitted assigns. This Agreement shall be governed by
and construed in accordance with the laws of The State of New York.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 1 to the Block Space
Agreement to be executed by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized, as of the date
first written above.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	DHL NETWORK OPERATIONS (USA). INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	     /s/ Jon E. Olin
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Jon E. Olin 	 
	 	 	Title:  	EVP, General Counsel and Secretary 	 
	 
	 	POLAR AIR CARGO WORLDWIDE, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	     /s/ William J. Flynn
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	William J. Flynn 	 
	 	 	Title:  	President and Chief Executive Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350)

 

Inconnection with the report of LFG International, Inc. (the "Company"), on Form10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Lyle Durham, Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to Sect. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C. Sect. 1350), that to my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

***/s/ Lyle Durham                                   ***

Lyle Durham, ChiefFinancial Officer and

Chief Executive Officer

Dated: August 11, 2006
§ 1512.19 Instructions and labeling. A bicycle shall have an instruction manual attached to its frame or included with the packaged unit. ( a ) The instruction manual shall include at least the following: ( 1 ) Operations and safety instructions describing operation of the brakes and gears, cautions concerning wet weather and night-time operation, and a guide for safe on-and-off road operation.
( 2 ) Assembly instructions for accomplishing complete and proper assembly.
( 3 ) Maintenance instructions for proper maintenance of brakes, control cables, bearing adjustments, wheel adjustments, lubrication, reflectors, tires and handlebar and seat adjustments; should the manufacturer determine that such maintenance is beyond the capability of the consumer, specifics regarding locations where such maintenance service can be obtained shall be included.
( b ) A bicycle less than fully assembled and fully adjusted shall have clearly displayed on any promotional display material and on the outside surface of the shipping carton the following: ( 1 ) A list of tools necessary to properly accomplish assembly and adjustment,
( 2 ) a drawing illustrating the minimum leg-length dimension of a rider and a method of measurement of this dimension.
( c ) The minimum leg-length dimension shall be readily understandable and shall be based on allowing no less than one inch of clearance between ( 1 ) the top tube of the bicycle and the ground plane and
( 2 ) the crotch measurement of the rider. A girl's style frame shall be specified in the same way using a corresponding boys' model as a basis.
( d ) [Reserved]
( e ) Every bicycle subject to the requirements of this part 1512 shall bear a marking or label that is securely affixed on or to the frame of the bicycle in such a manner that the marking or label cannot be removed without being defaced or destroyed. The marking or label shall identify the name of the manufacturer or private labeler and shall also bear some form of marking from which the manufacturer can identify the month and year of manufacture or from which the private labeler can identify the manufacturer and the month and year of manufacture. For purposes of this paragraph, the term *manufacture* means the completion by the manufacturer of a bicycle of those construction or assembly operations that are performed by the manufacturer before the bicycle is shipped from the manufacturer's place of production for sale to distributors, retailers, or consumers.
[43 FR 60034, Dec. 22, 1978, as amended at 60 FR 62990, Dec. 8, 1995]
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Inergy Holdings, L.P. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, R. Brooks Sherman, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of Inergy Holdings, L.P., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ R. Brooks Sherman, Jr.R. Brooks Sherman, Jr. Chief Financial
OfficerFebruary 6, 2009


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



38
§ 1118.1 Definitions, initiation of investigations, inspections, and inquiries and delegations. ( a ) *Definitions.* For the purpose of these rules, the following definitions apply: ( 1 ) *Act* means the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2051, *et seq.*).
( 2 ) *Commission* means the Consumer Product Safety Commission.
( 3 ) *Firm* means a manufacturer, private labeler, distributor, or retailer of a consumer product, except as otherwise provided by section 16(b) of the Act.
( 4 ) *Investigation* is an undertaking by the Commission to obtain information for implementing, enforcing, or determining compliance with the Consumer Product Safety Act and the regulations, rules, and orders issued under the Act. The term investigation includes, but is not limited to, inspections (§ 1118.2), investigational hearings (§ 1118.5), and inquiries; employing subpoenas (§ 1118.4), depositions (§ 1118.6), and general or special orders (§ 1118.9).
( 5 ) The definition of the terms set forth in section 3 of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2052) shall apply to this part 1118.
( b ) *Initiation of Investigations and Inquiries.* Investigations and inquiries will be initiated by the Commission in any manner authorized by law.
( c ) *Initiation of Inspections.* An inspection as described in § 1118.2 is initiated when the Commission or its delegate authorizes the issuance of a written notice of inspection, described in § 1118.2(c).
( d ) *Delegations of Authority.* The Commission hereby delegates to the Associate Executive Director for Compliance and Enforcement; the Solicitor, the Directors of the Divisions of Enforcement; the Solicitor, the Directors of the Divisions of Enforcement, Product Defect Correction, and Regulatory Management; and the directors of area offices, the power to initiate inspections in the same manner as the Commission.
### §12314. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 101–501, title IX, §918, Nov. 3, 1990, 104 Stat. 1265; Pub. L. 103–252, title IV, §402(a), May 18, 1994, 108 Stat. 672, established the Federal Council on Children, Youth, and Families, and terminated the Council on Sept. 30, 1998.
Exhibit 32

Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, James N. Ryan, the Chief Executive Officer of Petroleum Development Corporation, the managing general partner of PDC 2002-D Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"),  hereby certify that: 

- I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Partnership (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;
- the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

/s/ James N. Ryan                                

Name: James N. Ryan

Title: Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 13, 2003
### SUBCHAPTER XV–B—GRANTS FOR FAMILY-BASED SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT