alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1203.32 Definitions. The following definitions shall apply to this subpart: ( a ) *Foreign manufacturer* means an entity that manufactured a bicycle helmet outside the United States, as defined in 15 2052(a)(10) and (14).
( b ) *Manufacturer* means the entity that either manufactured a helmet in the United States or imported a helmet manufactured outside the United States.
( c ) *Private labeler* means an owner of a brand or trademark that is used on a bicycle helmet subject to the standard and that is not the brand or trademark of the manufacturer of the bicycle helmet, provided the owner of the brand or trademark caused, authorized, or approved its use.
( d ) *Production lot* means a quantity of bicycle helmets from which certain bicycle helmets are selected for testing prior to certifying the lot. All bicycle helmets in a lot must be essentially identical in those design, construction, and material features that relate to the ability of a bicycle helmet to comply with the standard.
( e ) *Reasonable testing program* means any tests which are identical or equivalent to, or more stringent than, the tests defined in the standard and which are performed on one or more bicycle helmets selected from the production lot to determine whether there is reasonable assurance that all of the bicycle helmets in that lot comply with the requirements of the standard.
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Tally-Ho Ventures, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the three months period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, Nigel
      Gregg, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his
      knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
      August 10, 2007











Nigel
      Gregg


Chief
      Executive Officer








32
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc. 04-25773) published on page 67913 of the issue for Monday, November 22, 2004.

Under the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City heading, the entry for Embry W. Williams, Jr., Amarillo, Texas, is revised to read as follows:

*1.  Embry W. Williams, Jr.*, Amarillo, Texas; Embry W. Williams, III, Richardson, Texas; and James David Williams, Kerrville, Texas; to acquire voting shares of Union Bancshares, Inc., Clayton, New Mexico, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of The First National Bank of New Mexico, Clayton, New Mexico.                

Comments on this application must be received by December 6, 2004.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 26, 2004.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 04-26458 Filed 11-30-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
§ 1223.2 Requirements for infant and cradle swings. Each infant and cradle swing (including combination swings) must comply with all applicable provisions of ASTM F2088-24, *Standard Consumer Safety Specification for Infant and Cradle Swings,* approved on February 1, 2024. The Director of the Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. You may inspect a copy at the Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, telephone (301) 504-7479, email *cpsc-os@cpsc.gov ,* or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, email *fr.inspection@nara.gov ,* or go to: *www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations .* A read-only copy of the standard is available for viewing on the ASTM website at *https://www.astm.org/READINGLIBRARY/ .* You may obtain a copy from ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959; telephone (610) 832-9500; *www.astm.org .*
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Salomon Smith Barney Orion Futures Fund L.P. (the ‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Jennifer Magro, Chief Financial Officer and Director of Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/    Jennifer MagroJennifer Magro
Citigroup Managed Futures LLC
Chief Financial Officer and Director


November 14, 2007

---
[Cite as State v. Sapp , 2019-Ohio-589.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

BUTLER COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO, : Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2018-04-069

: D E C I S I O N - vs - 2/19/2019 : BRYAN R. SAPP a.k.a. BRIAN SAPP : Appellant :

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Case No. CR2017-08-1361

Michael T. Gmos er, Prosecuting Attorney, John C. Heinkel, Government Service Center, 315 High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for appellee Michelle Temmel, 6 South Second Street, Suite 305, Hamilton, Ohio, 45011, for appellant

Per Curiam. {¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by appellant, Bryan R. Sapp a.k.a. Brian Sapp, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proc eedings and original papers from the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and upon a brief filed by appellant's counsel. {¶ 2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v.

California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court______________________

- 2 - prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists one potential error "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional righ ts; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. {¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

S. POWELL, P.J., PIPER and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.
§ 306.13 Incorporation by reference. ( a ) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this part with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. You may inspect all approved material at the FTC Library, (202) 326-2395, Federal Trade Commission, Room H-630, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20580, and at the National Archives and Records Administration (“NARA”). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html .*
( b ) ASTM International (ASTM), 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428 telephone: 1-877-909-2786; Internet address: *http://www.astm.org .* ( 1 ) ASTM D975-07b, Standard Specification for Diesel Fuel Oils, published July 2007; IBR approved for § 306.0(i).
( 2 ) ASTM D975-09b, Standard Specification for Diesel Fuel Oils, published August 2009; IBR approved for § 306.0(i).
( 3 ) ASTM D2699-15a, Standard Test Method for Research Octane Number of Spark-Ignition Engine Fuel, published November 2015; IBR approved for §§ 306.0(b) and 306.5(a).
( 4 ) ASTM D2700-14, Standard Test Method for Motor Octane Number of Spark-Ignition Engine Fuel, published November 2014; IBR approved for §§ 306.0(b) and 306.5(a).
( 5 ) ASTM D2885-13, Standard Test Method for Determination of Octane Number of Spark-Ignition Engine Fuels by On-Line Direct Comparison Technique, published July 2013; IBR approved for §§ 306.0(b) and 306.5(a).
( 6 ) ASTM D4814-15a, Standard Specification for Automotive Spark-Ignition Engine Fuel, published August 2015; IBR approved for §§ 306.0(b) and 306.5(a).
( 7 ) ASTM D6751-10, Standard Specification for Biodiesel Fuel Blend Stock (B100) for Middle Distillate Fuels, published October 2010; IBR approved for § 306.0(l).
[81 FR 2064, Jan. 14, 2016]
Exhibit 32





Certification pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Donald Mindiak, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and Thomas M. Coughlin, Principal Accounting Officer and Chief Operating Officer of BCB Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) each certify in his capacity as an officer of the Company that he has reviewed the quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended September 30, 2009 and that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)
the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.








November 12, 2009
/s/ Donald MindiakPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerNovember 12, 2009
/s/ Thomas M. CoughlinPrincipal Accounting Officer and Chief Operating Officer





31
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

N. ROBINSON and M. ROBINSON
, Appellant s ,

v.

INTERNATIONAL HOUSE OF PANCAKES a/k/a INTERNATIONAL

HOUSE OF PANCAKES, LLC, a foreign limited parent company, a Delaware company, NOSNAWS CORP., a Florida corporation, SUNSHINE RESTAURANT MERGER SUB, LLC, SUNSHINE RESTAURANT PARTNERS, LP, SUNSHINE RESTAURANT PARTNERS, GP, LLC, SUNSHINE RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, LLC, all registered with Florida as State of Georgia business entities, doing business in Florida under the

fictitious name of SUNSHINE RESTAURANT PARTNERS, LLC, a limited liability company, and RONALD NIELLY
, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 18

- 1923

[ March 21, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward Cou nty ; John Joseph Murphy , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 2009

- 042009

.

Freeman A. Mark of Mei & Mark LLP, Boca Raton and Edward J. Naidich of Mei & Mark LLP, Washington, DC, for appellants.

Kenneth R. Drake, Scott A. Markowitz, William C. McCue and Doron

Weiss of Demahy Labrador Drake Victor Rojas & Cabeza, Coral Gables , for appellees.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY
, K LINGENSMITH and K UNTZ
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.2
No: 14-090 December 18, 2014

CONTACT: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200 

NRC Publishes Volume 4 of Yucca Mountain Safety Evaluation Report

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has published Volume 4 of its safety evaluation 

report on the proposed underground geologic nuclear waste repository at Yucca Mountain in Nevada.

Volume 4 covers administrative and programmatic requirements for the repository. It 

documents the staff’s evaluation of whether the Department of Energy’s research and development and 

performance confirmation programs, as well as other administrative controls and systems, meet 

applicable NRC requirements. It contains the staff’s finding that most administrative and programmatic 

requirements in NRC regulations are met, except for certain requirements relating to ownership of land 

and water rights. Specifically, DOE has not acquired ownership or jurisdiction over the land where the

geologic repository operations area would be located, and the land is not free of significant 

encumbrances such as mining rights, deeds, rights-of-way or other legal rights. DOE also has not 

acquired water rights it determined are needed to accomplish the purpose of the geologic repository 

operations area.

DOE submitted its Yucca Mountain application in June 2008. The NRC staff published 

Volume 1 (General Information) of the safety evaluation report in August 2010. After DOE moved to 

withdraw the application and Congress stopped appropriating funds for the NRC’s review, the agency 

closed out its application review and published three technical evaluation reports containing the staff’s 

technical analyses to that point but no regulatory conclusions. The adjudication of nearly 300 

contentions filed by various parties contesting the application was also suspended in September 2011.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ordered the NRC in August 

2013 to resume the licensing process using currently available funding appropriated from the Nuclear 

Waste Fund. The NRC subsequently published Volume 3 (Repository Safety After Permanent Closure) 

on Oct. 16. The staff expects to publish volumes 2 (Repository Safety Before Permanent Closure) and 5

(License Specifications) by the end of January, as they are completed.

Publication of the various volumes does not signal whether the NRC might authorize 

construction of the repository. A final licensing decision, should funds beyond those currently available 

be appropriated, could come only after completion of the safety evaluation report, a supplement to the 

Department of Energy’s environmental impact statement, hearings on contentions in the adjudication, 

and Commission review.
Page | 2

NUREG-1949, Safety Evaluation Report Related to Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Wastes 

in a Geologic Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, Volume 4, and additional information on the 

Yucca Mountain licensing process are available on the NRC website.
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) August 1, 2011





CNA FINANCIAL CORPORATION(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware1-582336-6169860(State or other jurisdiction(Commission(IRS Employerof incorporation)File Number)Identification No.)











333 S. Wabash, Chicago, Illinois60604(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)





Registrant's telephone number, including area code     (312) 822-5000





NOT APPLICABLE(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)


Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions ( see General Instruction A.2. below):


[ ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


[ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)


[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))








1


---




ITEM 2.02 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION.


On August 1, 2011, the registrant issued a press release and posted on its website ( www.cna.com ) a financial supplement providing information on its results of operations for the second quarter 2011 .  The press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 and the financial supplement is furnished as Exhibit 99.2 to this Form 8-K.


The information under Item 2.02 and in Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2 in this Current Report is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for the purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section.  The information under Item 2.02 and in Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2 in this Current Report shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.





ITEM 9.01 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.


(d) Exhibits:


See Exhibit Index.





2


---




SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





CNA Financial Corporation(Registrant)Date:  August 1, 2011By/s/ D. Craig Mense(Signature)D. Craig MenseExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer





3


---




EXHIBIT INDEX





Exhibit No.Description99.1CNA Financial Corporation press release, issued August 1, 2011, providing information on the second quarter 2011 results of operations.99.2CNA Financial Corporation financial supplement, posted on its website August 1, 2011, providing supplemental financial information on the second quarter 2011.








4
§ 1238.2 Requirements for stationary activity centers. Each stationary activity center shall comply with all applicable provisions of ASTM F2012-18 1 *Standard Consumer Safety Performance Specification for Stationary Activity Centers*, approved on March 1, 2018. The Director of the Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. You may obtain a copy from ASTM International, 100 Bar Harbor Drive, P.O. Box 0700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428; *http://www.astm.org*. You may inspect a copy at the Division of the Secretariat, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Room 820, 4330 East-West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, telephone 301-504-7923, or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html .*
#### § 1034.149 Program accessibility: Discrimination prohibited.

Except as otherwise provided in § 1034.150, no qualified handicapped person shall, because the agency's facilities are inaccessible to or unusable by handicapped persons, be denied the benefits of, be excluded from participation in, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity conducted by the agency.
CARL DEON DENNIS

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 3488

_______ ______________________/

Opinion filed March 10, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Dixie County

. Wesley R. Douglas , Judge

.

Carl Deon Dennis, pro se , Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

THOMAS, CLA RK, and WETHERELL, JJ., CONCUR.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. No. 96-7465 NELSON HINES; SHAWN FENNER, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CR-93-205-JFM, CA-96-1565-JFM, CA-96-1666-JFM) Submitted: March 27, 1997 Decided: April 8, 1997 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________ Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL Lynne A. Battaglia, United States Attorney, Bonnie S. Greenberg, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant.James K. Bredar, Federal Public Defender, Denise C. Barrett, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Baltimore, Maryland; Barbara Gold, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________ OPINION PER CURIAM: The United States appeals two orders of the district court denying its requests to resentence Nelson Hines and Shawn Fenner on their surviving drug convictions after their convictions under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (1994) were v acated in light of Bailey v. United States , ___ U.S. ___, 64 U.S.L.W. 4039 (U.S. Dec. 6, 1995) (Nos.94-7449/7492). The government conceded that the§ 924(c) convictions should be v acated but requested resentencing in each case sothat the district court might consider a two-level enhancement for possession of a weapon in connection with the drug offenses. See United States Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual § 2D1.1 (Nov. 1995). The district court held that it lacked jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) to resentence Hines and Fenner.We recently considered the issue raised here and held that the district court has jurisdiction to resolve any issue which was not litigated and resolved at the original sentencing when the failure to litigate wasdirectly caused by the error which is the subject of the § 2255 petition. See United States v. Hillary , ___ F.3d ___, No. 96-7463, 1997 WL 61398 (4th Cir. Feb. 14, 1997). The judgment of the district court is therefore vacated, and the case is remanded with instructions to resentence Hines and Fenner. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentionsare adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. VACATED AND REMANDED 2
#### George H. Norwig, Jr., et al., Respondents, v. Lawrence Becker et al., Appellants.

Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ.