alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Add i t i ona l ques t i ons fo r A r i zona reg i ona l haze ana l ys is Fran c i sc o D one z to: mf reea rk 09 / 13 /2012 10 : 07 AM C c: Tho m a s Webb , M a rga re t Al k on , La rryS o rre l s , C o ll een M c K aughan Dea rM i c he ll e: S o rry , I got ou r reque s ted s ubm i ss i on date w rong i n m yp re v i ou s me ss age be l ow. W hat I meant to reque s t i s that y ou s end AEP C O ' s re s pon s e s to the s e c l a r i f i c at i on que s t i on s b yC O B th i s Monda y , S eptembe r17. If at a ll po ss i b l e, we wou l d li k e to get th i s i nfo r mat i on i nto the do ck et befo re the c omment pe r i od c l o s e s on S eptembe r18. A po l og i e s fo ran y c onfu s i on, and p l ea s e l et me k now i f th i s reque s ted dead li ne i s p rob l emat i c. B e s t, Fr an c i sco Fr an c i sc o Dóñe z , P h.D. U S E n v i ronmenta l P rote c t i on Agen cy O n deta il to A i r P l ann i ng O ff i c e ( A IR
- 2) 600 W il s h i re B l v d., S u i te 1460 Lo s A nge l e s , C A

90017 T e l

. ( 213 ) 244
- 1834 http://www.epa.go v/ reg i on9/a i r/ i nde x .html http://www.epa.go v/ reg i on9/s o c a l /about
- u s .html

__________________ Dea rM i c he ll e: S o rryfo rthe de l a y i n gett i ng the s e add i t i ona l que s t i on s to y ou. S ee be l ow. If i t i s po ss i b l e to s end re s pon s e s to the s e b y c l o s e of bu s i ne ss on Monda y , S eptembe r27, that wou l d be g reat. W e unde rs tand f rom the re s pon s e to que s t i on #4 f rom EPA that AEP C O ha s no " sc hedu l ed o r l p l anned E G U ret i rement date s "

. A l s o, AEP C O ha s i nd i c ated that the rema i n i ng li fe of the un i t s wa s 8 y ea rs . I s the re a re l at i on s h i p between the l ength of the e l e c t r i c i ty s a l e s c ont r a c t s ( up to 2020 ) and the rema i n i ng li fe of the un i t s ( 8 y ea rs) a s i n c l uded i n the ana l ys i s of f i nan c i a l i mpa c t s f rom S CR i n s ta ll at i on and ope r at i on i n the re s pon s e to que s t i on #1? If s o, p l ea s e e l abo r ate and e x p l a i n i f i t i s not po ss i b l e to c on s i de ra rema i n i ng li fe fo rthe un i t s be y ond 2020. AEP C O ' s f i nan c i a l ana l ys i s i n the re s pon s e to que s t i on #1 ref l e c t s a t i me ho r i z on of 15 y ea rs
. F o r l ou r s tanda rd ana l ys i s of S CR, EPA a ss ume s a t i me ho r i z on of 20 y ea rs fo rthe u s efu l li fe of the equ i pment. W hat i s AEP C O ' s j u s t i f i c at i on fo ra ss um i ng a 15 -y ea rt i me ho r i z on? P l ea s e c onta c t me i f y ou need mo re i nfo r mat i on. T han k y ou! B e s t, Fr an c i sco Fr an c i sc o Dóñe z , P h.D. U S E n v i ronmenta l P rote c t i on Agen cy O n deta il to A i r P l ann i ng O ff i c e ( A IR
- 2) 600 W il s h i re B l v d., S u i te 1460 Lo s A nge l e s , C A

90017 T e l

. ( 213 ) 244
- 1834 http://www.epa.go v/ reg i on9/a i r/ i nde x .htmlhttp ://www
. epa
. gov/ reg i on 9 /s o c al / about
- us
. html
### §3707. Contractor certification or contract clause in acquisition of commercial items not required

In a contract to acquire a commercial product (as defined in section 103 of title 41) or a commercial service (as defined in section 103a of title 41), a certification by a contractor or a contract clause may not be required to implement a prohibition or requirement in this chapter.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1174; Pub. L. 111–350, §5(l)(21), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3852; Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §836(g)(6), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1874.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3707 | 40:334. | Pub. L. 87–581, title I, §108, as added Pub. L. 103–355, title VIII, §8301(b), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3396. |

Section

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 substituted "a commercial product (as defined in section 103 of title 41) or a commercial service (as defined in section 103a of title 41)" for "a commercial item (as defined in section 103 of title 41)".

2011—Pub. L. 111–350 substituted "section 103 of title 41" for "section 4 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403)".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Jan. 1, 2020, subject to a savings provision, see section 836(h) of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as an Effective Date of 2018 Amendment; Savings Provision note under section 453b of Title 6, Domestic Security.
Appendix C

PICTURES FROM THE SAMPLING EPISODE
C-1

Figure C-1. Sampler Working Inside a “Cleanbox”
C-2

Figure C-2. Sample Tap and Tubing at the Influent to the FGD Wastewater Treatment 

System
C-3

Figure C-3. Sample Collection at the Influent to the FGD Wastewater Treatment System
C-4

Figure C-4. Sample Collection Set Up at the Pump-Off Station
C-5

Figure C-5. Composite Sample Collection Set Up at the Effluent from the FGD Wastewater 

Treatment System
AMENDMENT TO TERMS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

ASSIGNMENT AND SALE AGREEMENT

DATED EFFECTIVE AS OF JANUARY 25, 2002

Recitals

A.	Healthbridge, Inc. a Texas corporation ("Purchaser") and B.I.M.E. GmbH., a German corporation, Hutter Wimbock Umwelttech GmbH, Herman Esser and Eduard Kneifel ("Sellers") are parties to that certain Intellectual Property Assignment and Sale Agreement dated effective as of January 25, 2002 in connection with Purchaser's acquisition of certain intellectual property from Sellers (the "Agreement").

B.	Pursuant to Section 1.2 of the Agreement Purchasers are to make a final delivery of the euro denominated equivalent of 120,000 deutsche marks and 225,000 shares of Purchaser's common stock on or before March 31, 2002 (the "Final Payment").

C.	Pursuant to Section 8.4 of the Agreement, the parties may agree to a binding amendment to its terms and conditions if the Purchaser and Sellers execute such amendment.

D.	In order to accommodate certain issues pertaining to the transaction, the parties desire to amend the Agreement by extending the period in which the Purchaser must deliver the Final Payment from March 31, 2002 to a date no later than April 25, 2002.

Agreement

In consideration of the foregoing recitals and other valuable consideration, the parties hereby agree to amend the Agreement pursuant to Section 8.4 thereof, by extending the period in which the Purchaser must deliver the Final Payment, from March 31, 2002 to a date no later than April 25, 2002.

The Agreement is hereby amended and modified for all purposes necessary to effect this change as of March 28, 2002.



|HEALTHBRIDGE, INC.      | B.I.M.E. GMBH                
|----------------------- | -----------------------------
|                        |                              
|                        |                              
|BY: /s/ Nora Coccaro    | BY: /s/ Herman Eser          
|Nora Coccaro, President | Hermann Eser, Geschaftsfuhrer
|                        |                              
|                        | Eduard Kneifel               
|                        |                              
|                        | /s/ Eduard Kneifel           
|                        |                              
|                        | Hermann Eser                 
|                        |                              
|                        | /s/ Herman Eser              



- 36 -



===========================================================================
No: II-15-016 April 1, 2015

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

 Joey Ledford 404-997-4416 

NRC Schedules Open House to Discuss McGuire Nuclear Plant 2014 Performance

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled an open house and poster session for 

Thursday, April 9 to discuss the agency’s assessment of the McGuire nuclear plant’s two units during 

2014.

The plant, operated by Duke Energy, is located near Huntersville, N.C., about 17 miles north of 

Charlotte.

The open house and poster session is scheduled to begin at 5:30 p.m. at the McGuire Energy 

Explorium, 13339 Hagers Ferry Road, Huntersville. 

NRC staff members will be available to answer questions on the safety performance and 

regulatory oversight of the McGuire plant, as well as highlights of NRC inspections. 

“NRC inspectors continually evaluate each nuclear plant’s safety, and each year we take a 

detailed look at that information to identify any trends and help plan future inspections,” said NRC 

Region II Administrator Victor McCree. “Inspection results are available throughout the year, but these 

annual meetings allow us to talk to local residents and answer any questions they may have.”

The NRC Region II office sent a letter to plant officials addressing McGuire plant performance 

during 2014, and while that letter will serve as the main focus of the open house, NRC staff members 

will be available to answer other questions about the NRC’s role at the plant. 

The NRC review of the McGuire plant for 2014 concluded that the plant operated in a manner 

that preserved public health and safety and protected the environment. Because of that performance, it

will continue to receive the detailed routine or baseline inspections this year that all nuclear power 

plants receive.

The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess plant 

performance. The colors start with green, which has very low safety significance, and then progress to 

white, yellow or red, based on the significance of the issues. 

Current performance information for both McGuire Unit 1 and Unit 2 is available on the NRC 

website, and that information is updated throughout the year.
#### § 270.300 Scope.

During the course of an investigation conducted pursuant to the Act, evidence will be collected, and information will be created by the Team, NIST, and other investigation participants. This subpart sets forth the policy and procedures for the collection, preservation, and protection of evidence obtained and information created pursuant to an investigation.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David Lyle, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to
the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Entropic Communications, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report.



|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                 
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|DATE: September 18, 2012 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ David Lyle                                                  
|                         |  |  |  |     |  | David Lyle
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
ex10_h.htm


    Exhibit
      10(h)

     

     

    


    AMENDMENT

    


    TO

    


    SOUTHERN
      UNION COMPANY

    DIRECTORS’
      DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

    


    


    Pursuant
      to Section 11.1 of the
      Southern Union Company Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”), the
      Plan is amended as set forth below.

     

    1.           Effective
      April 1, 2007, Section 3.2 of the Plan, entitled Southern Union’s Matching
      Contributions, is amended to add a third and final sentence, to read as
      follows:

     

    The
      preceding provisions of this Section 3.2 notwithstanding, with respect to
      Participant Deferral Contributions attributable to Directors’ Fees paid on or
      after April 1, 2007, Southern Union’s Matching Contributions shall be zero
      percent of the Participant’s Deferral Contributions.

    


    2.           Effective
      April 1, 2007, Section 5.2 of the Plan, entitled Forfeitures, is amended
      to read as follows:

     

    5.2    Forfeitures.    That
      portion
      of a Participant’s Account that is not vested upon the Participant’s termination
      of service as a Director of Southern Union and that is forfeited shall be used
      to pay expenses relating to the Plan.

    


    


    EXECUTED
      this 27th day of
      March,
      2007.

    


                            SOUTHERN
      UNION
      COMPANY

    


    


                            By:  /s/
      Richard N. Marshall

                          Officer
§ 1130.2 Definitions. In addition to the definitions given in section 3 of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2052), the following definitions apply: ( a ) *Definition of durable infant or toddler product* means the following products intended for use, or that may be reasonably expected to be used, by children under the age of 5 years. The listed product categories are further defined in the applicable standards that the Commission issues under section 104(b) of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008, and include products that are combinations of the following product categories: ( 1 ) Full-size cribs and non-full-size cribs;
( 2 ) Toddler beds;
( 3 ) High chairs, booster seats, and hook-on chairs;
( 4 ) Bath seats;
( 5 ) Gates and other enclosures for confining a child;
( 6 ) Play yards;
( 7 ) Stationary activity centers;
( 8 ) Infant carrier, including soft infant and toddler carriers, hand-held infant carriers, sling carriers, and frame child carriers;
( 9 ) Strollers;
( 10 ) Walkers;
( 11 ) Swings;
( 12 ) Bassinets and cradles, including bedside sleepers and infant sleep products;
( 13 ) Children's folding chairs and children's folding stools;
( 14 ) Baby changing products;
( 15 ) Infant bouncers;
( 16 ) Infant bathtubs;
( 17 ) Bed rails; and
( 18 ) Crib mattresses.
( b ) *Manufacturer,* for purposes of this part, in the case of a product produced within the United States, means the domestic manufacturer of the product, and in the case of an imported product, means the importer of the product.
( c ) *Product recall* means action taken pursuant to sections 12, 15(c) or 15(d) of the CPSA (15 U.S.C. 2061, 2054(c), or 2064(d)), and action taken pursuant to a corrective action plan implemented by a company in cooperation with the Commission, where the firm is conducting one or more of the following: repair of the product; replacement of the product; or refund of the purchase price of the product.
( d ) *Safety alert* means notice or warning of a potential problem with an individual product or class of products so that consumers and other users of the affected products respond accordingly to reduce or eliminate the potential for injury.
[74 FR 68676, Dec. 29, 2009, as amended at 82 FR 59511, Dec. 15, 2017; 84 FR 49950, Sept. 24, 2019; 87 FR 26658, May 17, 2021; 86 FR 33071, June 23, 2021; 87 FR 8673, Feb. 15, 2022]
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature: 

 Project No.: 0172.08.005.607 Page 1 of 1 

 Project Name: 2011 Prelim Cat Rev CBI? 

 Yes 

 No 

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD 

 Incoming 

 Outgoing 

Date: 08/24/11 Time: 2:00 am 

 pm 

Company Name: NCDENR ERG Staff Name: Elizabeth Sabol 

Contact Name: Jacquelyn Nowell Contact Phone Number: (919)733-5083 ext 512 

General Subject: 2009 DMR Fluoride Discharges 

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN 

I called Ms. Nowell on Wednesday, August 24, 2011 at 2:00 pm to obtain information on fluoride discharges 

from the Feldspar Corporation Spruce Pine mine in the 2009 DMR data. A summary of the conversation is 

provided below. 

Ms. Nowell stated that there are 5 feldspar mines along the North Toe River in North Carolina (including the 

Spruce Pine mine). Ms. Nowell explained that the water quality standard in the North Carolina for fluoride is 

1.8 mg/L. Using the water quality standard, the total allocation for fluoride in the North Toe River is determine 

and then divided among the five mines based on the design capacity to determine each facility’s fluoride permit 

limits. Ms. Nowell also explained that they use the 7Q10 flow to determine the fluoride allocation. North 

Carolina monitors fluoride levels in the North Toe River at ambient monitoring stations to confirm that fluoride 

concentrations are below 1.8 mg/L. Ms. Nowell also stated that fluoride is not considered a problem in the 

North Toe River; therefore, no revisions to the water quality standard are in the near future. 

Ms. Nowell also stated that all five feldspar mines currently discharge directly to the North Toe River; however, 

prior to 2010, one facility (Unimin Corporation) directed its facility discharges to the Feldspar Corporation 

Spruce Pine facility. Therefore, the Spruce Pine permit limits were higher to account for the Unimin discharges 

until 2010, when they were lowered after Unimin started discharging directly.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 30, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 69606]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26334]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 2004F-0455]


Sterigenics International, Inc.; Filing of Food Additive Petition

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that 
Sterigenics International, Inc., has filed a petition proposing that 
the food additive regulations be amended to provide for the safe use of 
ionizing radiation in the production of shelf stable foods, including 
multiple ingredient shelf stable foods.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lane A. Highbarger, Center for Food 
Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-255), Food and Drug Administration, 
5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740-3835, 301-436-1204.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 
Act (sec. 409(b)(5) (21 U.S.C. 348(b)(5))), notice is given that a food 
additive petition (FAP 3M4744) has been filed by Sterigenics 
International, Inc., P.O. Box 17349, Memphis, TN 31817-0349. The 
petition proposes that the food additive regulations in part 179 
Irradiation in the Production, Processing and Handling of Food (21 CFR 
179) be amended to provide for the safe use of ionizing radiation in 
the production of fully cooked shelf stable foods, including fully 
cooked multiple ingredient shelf stable foods, where the absorbed dose 
required to cause a 12-log reduction in Clostridium botulinum has been 
established.
    The agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.32(j) that this action is 
of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental 
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.

    Dated: October 28, 2004.
Laura M. Tarantino,
Deputy Director, Office of Food Additive Safety, Center for Food Safety 
and Applied Nutrition.
[FR Doc. 04-26334 Filed 11-29-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Annual
Report of Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the SEC on the date hereof, I, Eva Chen, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 26, 2012



By:

/s/ Eva ChenName:

Eva ChenTitle:

Chief Financial Officer




|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the company and will be retained by the
company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### § 1209.11 Effective date.

All cellulose insulation that is a consumer product and that is manufactured after October 15, 1979 shall meet the requirements of this standard, including the labeling requirement of § 1209.9.
[Civil No. 324.]

#### WANG HOW et al., Appellants, v. WILLIAM DEE, Appellee.

APPEAL from the District Court of the First Judicial District in and for the County of Cochise.

George G. Berry, for Appellants.

Herring & Herring, for Appellee.

February 3, 1891.

Affirmed.
#### § 1202.5 Certification.

Certification shall be in accordance with section 14(a) of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2063(a)). Under this provision, manufacturers and private labelers of products subject to safety standards must certify that their products conform to the standard, based on either a test of each product or on a reasonable testing program.
#### § 1016.2 Definition.

*Private litigation* refers to any legal proceeding which does not involve the United States government, or any department or agency of the U.S. government, as a party.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2516

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to clarify that Christmas 

tree farming is agriculture under that Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 19, 2003

Mr. BALLENGER (for himself, Mr. BURR, and Mr. BOEHNER) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 

Workforce 

A BILL

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to clarify 

that Christmas tree farming is agriculture under that Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 3(f) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 

4 (29 U.S.C. 203(f)) is amended by inserting ‘‘Christmas 

5 trees and’’ after ‘‘commodities (including’’.

Æ