alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1507.1 Scope.

This part 1507 prescribes requirements for those fireworks devices (other than firecrackers) not otherwise banned under the act. Any fireworks device (other than firecrackers) which fails to conform to applicable requirements is a banned hazardous substance and is prohibited from the channels of interstate commerce. Any fireworks device not otherwise banned under the act shall not be a banned hazardous substance by virtue of the fact that there are no applicable requirements prescribed herein.
§ 3.13 Adjudicative hearing on issues arising in rulemaking proceedings under the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act. ( a ) *Notice of hearing.* When the Commission, acting under § 1.26(g) of this chapter, determines that objections which have been filed are sufficient to warrant the holding of an adjudicative hearing in rulemaking proceedings under the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act, or when the Commission otherwise determines that the holding of such a hearing would be in the public interest, a hearing will be held before an Administrative Law Judge for the purpose of receiving evidence relevant and material to the issues raised by such objections or other issues specified by the Commission. In such case the Commission will publish a notice in the Federal Register containing a statement of: ( 1 ) The provisions of the rule or order to which objections have been filed;
( 2 ) The issues raised by the objections or the issues on which the Commission wishes to receive evidence;
( 3 ) The time and place for hearing, the time to be at least thirty (30) days after publication of the notice; and
( 4 ) The time within which, and the conditions under which, any person who petitioned for issuance, amendment, or repeal of the rule or order, or any person who filed objections sufficient to warrant the holding of the hearing, or any other interested person, may file notice of intention to participate in the proceeding.
( b ) *Parties.* Any person who petitions for issuance, amendment, or repeal of a rule or order, and any person who files objections sufficient to warrant the holding of a hearing, and who files timely notice of intention to participate, shall be regarded as a party and shall be individually served with any pleadings filed in the proceeding. Upon written application to the Administrative Law Judge and a showing of good cause, any interested person may be designated by the Administrative Law Judge as a party.
[32 FR 8449, June 13, 1967, as amended at 40 FR 33969, Aug. 13, 1975]
EXHIBIT 31.2

MEDICINOVA, INC.

Certification of the Principal Accounting Officer Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for the Period Ended June 30, 2006

I, Shintaro Asako, Vice President, Accounting and Administration of MediciNova, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2006 of MediciNova, Inc. (the
Registrant);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant
and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b) [omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8392];

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: August 11, 2006By:

/s/    SHINTARO ASAKOShintaro Asako Vice President, Accounting and Administration (Principal Accounting
Officer)
#### Times Square Properties, Inc., Respondent, v. Alhabb Realty Corp., Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Breitel and Bastow, JJ.
#### § 1112.21 May a third party conformity assessment body use testing methods other than those specified in the relevant CPSC rule or test method?

If the CPSC has specified a test method, a third party conformity assessment body must use that test method for any tests conducted for purposes of section 14 of the CPSA.
#### § 1102.4 Scope.

This part applies to the content, procedure, notice, and disclosure requirements of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database, including all information published therein.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 24, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 68327]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26035]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for 
the Proposed Consolidation of Nuclear Operations Related to Production 
of Radioisotope Power Systems; Correction

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of Intent; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Energy published a notice of intent in the 
Federal Register on November 16, 2004, (69 FR 67139) announcing its 
intent to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS), for the 
proposed consolidation of nuclear activities related to production of 
radioisotope power systems required for Government national security 
and space exploration missions at a single, highly secure DOE site. The 
document contained an incorrect telephone number and an incorrect 
street address for a public meeting.

Corrections

    In the Federal Register of November 16, 2004, in FR Doc. 04-25406, 
on page 67140, the following corrections should be made:

First column, first paragraph,
    Twin Falls, ID: 1586 Blue Lakes Blvd. North,
Second column, under ADDRESSES heading, first paragraph,
    You may leave a message at (800) 919-3706.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Timothy A. Frazier, Document Manager, 
NE-50/Germantown Building, Office of Space and Defense Power Systems, 
Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology, U.S. Department of 
Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585-1290, 
telephone 301-903-9420, or submitted via e-mail to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ca89a5a4b9a5a6a3aeabbea3a5a48f83998aa4bfa9a6afabb8e4afa4afb8adb3e4ada5bc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="24674b4a574b484d4045504d4b4a616d77644a5147484145560a414a4156435d0a434b52">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Issued in Washington, DC on November 18, 2004.
Carol M. Borgstrom,
Director, Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 04-26035 Filed 11-23-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27711 AUG 21 2014 OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY PLANNING AND STANDARDS MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: FROM: Thru: Posting EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0563 to Regulations.gov for Public Access Carla Oldham 

### :({_/d . .c) 

# cJ

**!~:l£z_("<J~-** Air Quality Policy Division, OAQPS --- AnnaMarie Wood, Director



# OuVLW).)-:2-~­ Air QualityPolicyDivision, OAQPS This memorandum authorizes the posting ofEPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0563 to Regulations.gov for public access. The subject docket (Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0563) supports a Federal Registernotice to be published titled, "Notice ofFinal Action on Petition From Sierra Club to Redesignate Newly Violating Ozone Areas as Nonattainment." This FederalRegisterwill announce that the EPA has responded to a petition from the Sierra Club in letters to the signatories ofthe petition and will provide details ofthe docket document ID numbers ofthe incoming petition and the response letters signed onAugust 14, 2014. There is no commentperiod associated with this FederalRegisternotice. Publication ofthe Federal Registernotice will start the 60-day clock for filing petitions for review ofthe response letters. Should you have any questions regarding this memorandum, please contact Eric Shultz at (202) 566- 1883, or via email at schultz.eric@epa.gov.

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable • Printed

**w~h** Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 25% Postconsurner)
#### § 1512.1 Scope.

This part sets forth the requirements for a bicycle as defined in § 1512.2(a) (except a bicycle that is a “track bicycle” or a “one-of-a-kind bicycle” as defined in § 1512.2 (d) and (e)) which is not a banned article under § 1500.18(a)(12) of this chapter.
### SUBCHAPTER XII—RENEWABLE ENERGY INITIATIVES

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This subchapter was enacted as part of title IV of the Energy Security Act, which title is known as the Renewable Energy Resources Act of 1980, and not as part of the Department of Energy Organization Act which comprises this chapter.
§ 325.11 Judicial review. ( a ) *Review of certain determinations.* ( 1 ) Any person aggrieved by a final determination of the Secretary under § 325.5, § 325.7, § 325.9, or § 325.10 of these regulations may, within thirty days of the determination, bring an action in an appropriate district court of the United States to set aside the determination on the ground that it is erroneous. If a certificate is denied, the applicant may bring suit within thirty days after the notice of denial is published in the Federal Register, or, if the applicant seeks reconsideration, within thirty days after the Secretary publishes in the Federal Register notice of his determination after reconsideration.
( b ) For purposes of judicial review, determinations of the Secretary are final when notice is published in the Federal Register.
( c ) *Record for judicial review.* For purposes of judicial review, the record shall include all information presented to or obtained by the Secretary which had a bearing on the determination, the determination itself, the supporting statement setting forth the reasons for the determination, and the Attorney General's response to the Secretary indicating concurrence or nonconcurrence.
( d ) *Limitation of judicial review.* Except as provided in paragraph (a) of this section, no agency action taken under the Act shall be subject to judicial review.
§ 762.6 Period of retention. ( a ) *Five year retention period.* All records required to be kept by the EAR must be retained for five years from the latest of the following times: ( 1 ) The export from the United States of the item involved in the transaction to which the records pertain or the provision of financing, transporting or other service for or on behalf of end-users of proliferation concern as described in §§ 736.2(b)(7) and 744.6 of the EAR;
( 2 ) Any known reexport, transfer (in-country), transshipment, or diversion of such item;
( 3 ) Any other termination of the transaction, whether formally in writing or by any other means; or
( 4 ) In the case of records of pertaining to transactions involving restrictive trade practices or boycotts described in part 760 of the EAR, the date the regulated person receives the boycott-related request or requirement.
( b ) *Destruction or disposal of records.* If the Bureau of Industry and Security or any other government agency makes a formal or informal request for a certain record or records, such record or records may not be destroyed or disposed of without the written authorization of the agency concerned. This prohibition applies to records pertaining to voluntary disclosures made to BIS in accordance with § 764.5(c)(4)(ii) and other records even if such records have been retained for a period of time exceeding that required by paragraph (a) of this section.
[61 FR 12900, Mar. 25, 1996, as amended at 72 FR 3946, Jan. 29, 2007; 87 FR 57106, Sept. 16, 2022]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

 ) 

AMERICAN PUBLIC GAS ASSOCIATION ) 

 ) 

 Petitioner, ) 

 ) 

 v. ) No. 09-1331 

 ) (consolidated with cases 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL ) 09-1325, 09-1326, 09-1328 

PROTECTION AGENCY, ) 09-1329, 09-1332, 09-1333, 

 ) 09-1334) 

 Respondent. ) 

 )

PETITIONER’S PRELIMINARY NON-BINDING STATEMENT OF ISSUES 

Petitioner American Public Gas Association provides the following non-binding 

Statement of Issues: 

Whether the reporting and record-keeping requirements applicable to natural gas local 

distribution companies imposed in the proceedings below by the Respondent Environmental 

Protection Agency’s Rule on Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases were arbitrary and 

capricious. 

Respectfully submitted, 

 /s/ Joshua L. Menter 

William T. Miller 

Joshua L. Menter 

MILLER, BALIS & O’NEIL, P.C. 

1015 15th Street, N.W. 

12th Floor 

Washington, DC 20005 

(202) 296-2960 

jmenter@mbolaw.com 

ATTORNEYS FOR AMERICAN 

PUBLIC GAS ASSOCIATION 

February 4, 2010 

Case: 09-1331 Document: 1229298 Filed: 02/04/2010 Page: 1
Exhibit
31.1
 **CERTIFICATIONS**
 
 I, James
Price, certify, that:
 
 1.
    I
      have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Benacquista
      Galleries, Inc.;
 2.
    Based
      on my knowledge, the quarterly report does not contain any untrue
      statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
      make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
      statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
      this report;
 3.
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
      report;
 4.
    The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
      registrant and we have:
 a.
    Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the registrant, including our
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;
 b.
    Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
      covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 c.
    Disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent
      fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.
 5.
    The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
      most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit
      committee or registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the
      equivalent function):
 a.
    All
      significant deficiencies in the design or operation of the internal
      controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
      affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report
      financial information; and
 b.
    Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal
      controls.
 
 
 */s/
      James
      Price*James
      PriceChief
      Executive OfficerDuly
      Authorized Officer and PrincipalFinancial
      and Accounting Officer*Date:
      May 20, 2005*
#### In the Matter of Angela S. Morgan, as Guardian of the Person of Lewis McC. Herzog, Jr., an Infant, Appellant. United States Trust Company of New York, Respondent. In the Matter of Angela S. Morgan, as Guardian of the Person of Angela R. Herzog, an infant, Appellant. United States Trust Company of New York, Respondent. Angela S. Morgan, Respondent-Appellant, v. Lewis McC. Herzog, Sr., Third Party Appellant-Respondent, and Seymour Graubard, as Guardian ad Litem for Lewis McC. Herzog, Jr., and Another Third Party Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.; Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ., dissent and vote to modify so as to direct payment to Lewis McComb Herzog, Sr., of the sum of $2,500 for each of the minor children, said sum to be used by him for the support of the minor children, according to the separation agreement, for such time as he has their legal custody. [192 Misc. 352.]
No: I-15-005 February 9, 2015

CONTACT: Diane Screnci 610-337-5330

Neil Sheehan 610-337-5331

NRC Assigns New Senior Resident Inspector to Limerick Nuclear Plant 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia, Pa., 

have selected Scott Rutenkroger as the new Senior Resident Inspector at the 

Limerick nuclear power plant. The two-unit site is operated by Exelon 

Nuclear and is located in Limerick, Pa.

 “Scott Rutenkroger has the experience, training and commitment to 

safety that is needed for the NRC to carry out its mission of protecting 

people and the environment by ensuring the safe operation of the Limerick 

units,” said NRC Region I Administrator Dan Dorman. 

Most recently, Rutenkroger was the Senior Resident Inspector at Vermont Yankee, and was also 

was a Resident Inspector at the James A. FitzPatrick nuclear plant in Scriba, N.Y. Rutenkroger joined 

the NRC’s Region IV office in Arlington, Texas, in June 2004 as a reactor inspector. He is a graduate 

of the NRC’s Nuclear Safety Professional Development Program, a two-year training program that 

provides a broad and a specialized perspective of NRC activities. He also completed a rigorous NRC 

inspector qualification program. He earned a doctorate in electrical engineering, as well as master’s and 

bachelor’s degrees in nuclear engineering, from the University of Missouri-Rolla. 

Each of the nation’s commercial nuclear plants has at least two Resident Inspectors who serve 

as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting regular inspections, monitoring significant 

work projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. 

Rutenkroger joins Resident Inspector Richard Montgomery at Limerick. The Limerick Resident 

Inspectors can be reached at 610-327-1344.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00192

- CR

Rodrigo Villalobos

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From Criminal District Court No. 1

o f Tarrant County (1220999D )

May 2, 2013

Opinion by Justice Walker

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

___________________________ ______ Justice Sue Walker
§ 1110.3 Definitions. The following definitions apply for purposes of this part 1110. ( a ) *Electronic certificate* means, for purposes of this part 1110, a set of information available in, and accessible by, electronic means that sets forth the information required by CPSA section 14(a) and section 14(g) and that meets the availability requirements of CPSA section 14(g)(3).
( b ) Unless otherwise stated, the definitions of section 3 of the CPSA and additional definitions in the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (CPSIA), Pub. L. 110-314, apply for purposes of this part 1110.
### §902. Definitions

In this chapter, the following definitions apply:

(1) Unit of general local government.—The term "unit of general local government" means a city, county, town, parish, village, or other general-purpose political subdivision of a State.

(2) Urban area.—The term "urban area" means—

(A) a geographical area within the jurisdiction of an incorporated city, town, borough, village, or other unit of general local government, except a county or parish, having a population of at least 10,000 inhabitants;

(B) that portion of the geographical area within the jurisdiction of a county, town, township, or similar governmental entity which contains no incorporated unit of general local government but has a population density of at least 1,500 inhabitants per square mile; and

(C) that portion of a geographical area having a population density of at least 1,500 inhabitants per square mile and situated adjacent to the boundary of an incorporated unit of general local government which has a population of at least 10,000.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1128.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 902 | 40:535(a), (b). | June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title VIII, §806(a), (b), as added Pub. L. 90–577, title V, §501, Oct. 16, 1968, 82 Stat. 1105. |

Section
#### Ralph E. Teator, Respondent, v. City of Utica, Appellant.

Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ.