alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Anna M. Small, Appellant, v. Carl Ruhmshottel et al., Copartners Doing Business as Ruhmshottel Farms, et al., Respondents. Carl Ruhmshottel, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. August Roll, Third-Party Defendant.

Action to recover damages for personal injuries. Plaintiff was a business visitor upon land where shrubs were grown and sold. She stepped into a hole near a path, and was injured. Presumably, on the evidence, the hole resulted from the removal of a plant that was being sold. The Trial Justice dismissed the complaint at the end of the plaintiff’s case on the ground that defendants did not have control of the portion of the premises upon which the accident happened, the shrubbery business being operated by defendants’ employee on his own account; and that in any event defendants had no knowledge or notice of the defective or dangerous condition. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment entered thereon. Judgment, insofar as appeal is taken, affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Adel, Wenzel and Beldock, JJ., concur; Nolan, ,P. J., and MacCrate, J., concur as to the partnership defendants, but dissent and vote'to reverse the judgment and to grant a new trial as to the defendant Carl Ruhmshottel, individually, with the following memorandum: In our opinion, a question of fact was presented, as to the control of the premises upon which the accident occurred, by the defendant Carl Ruhmshottel, and as to his responsibility for the condition which was alleged to have caused the accident. (Cf. *Green*v. *Murray M. Rosenberg, Inc.,*295 N. Y. 584; *McGuire*v. *Interborough R. T. Co.,*104 App. Div. 105, 108, and *Santise*v. *Martins, Inc.,*258 App. Div. 663.)
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 228 (Monday, November 29, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 69398]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26226]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Petroleum Convenience Alliance for Technology 
Standards

AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that, on September 22, 2004, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Petroleum convenience 
Alliance for Technology Standards (``PCATS'') has filed written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of 
business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature 
and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications 
were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting 
the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances.
    Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: Petroleum 
Convenience Alliance for Technology Standards, Alexandria, VA. The 
nature and scope of PCATS' standards development activities are: (1) 
Development and maintenance of XML-based standards for electronic data 
interchange, specifically related to information between point-of-sale 
(POS) systems and back office systems, and for exchanging data between 
trading partners for general merchandise, lottery, and motor fuels; (2) 
development of an ``open site'' architecture for integration of devices 
used by petroleum and convenience retailers through peer-to-peer 
messaging, based on JXTA, an open standard; and (3) maintenance of 
product codes used in terminal-to-host messages developed by ANSI-
Accredited Standards Committee X9, originally contained in Technical 
Guide-23 (1999) and now being balloted by X9 for adoption as X9.104, 
Parts 1 and 2.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-26226 Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION




Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Horne International, Inc. (“Horne”), that, to the best of his knowledge and belief, the quarterly report of Horne on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 27, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Horne.




Date: May 9, 2011
By:
/s/    Evan Auld-SusottEvan Auld-SusottChief Executive OfficerDate: May 9, 2011
By:
/s/    Lily L. XuLily L. XuChief Financial Officer





This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-Q. A signed original of this statement has been provided to Horne and will be retained by Horne and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
§ 1750.1 Definitions. As used in this part: ( a ) *Act* means the Refrigerator Safety Act (Pub. L. 84-930, 70 Stat. 953; 15 U.S.C. 1211-14), enacted August 2, 1956.
( b ) *Commission* means the Consumer Product Safety Commission established by the Consumer Product Safety Act (Pub. L. 92-573, sec. 4, 86 Stat. 1210; 15 U.S.C. 2053).
( c ) *Device* means the mechanism or the means provided for enabling the doors of household refrigerators to be opened from the inside.
( d ) *Effective date* means the date under the provisions of the act after which all household refrigerators manufactured and introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce must comply with this standard. This date is October 30, 1958.
( e ) *Household refrigerator* means a cabinet or any part of a cabinet designed for the storage of food at temperatures above 0 °C. (32 °F.), having a source of refrigeration, and intended for household use.
( f ) *Opened* as applied to a refrigerator door means to effect release of the latching mechanism so that a trapped child would have to apply little or no further effort in order to escape.
( g ) *Shelving* means any shelf, basket, drawer, or baffle which can be readily removed from the refrigerator without the use of tools.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Michael D. Durham, as President and Chief Executive Officer of ADA-ES, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Companys Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael D. Durham
|Name:                 |  | Michael D. Durham                    
|Title:                |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date:                 |  | August 16, 2010
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Medical International Technology, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Karim Menassa, President and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

\s\             Karim MenassaKarim MenassaPresident and Chairman of the Board February 3, 2004

----
#### Kerstin Swensson, Respondent, v. New York, Albany Despatch Company, Inc., Respondent, and Ward La France Truck Corp., Appellant. Yolanda Trimboli, as Administratrix of the Estate of Anthony J. Trimboli, Deceased, Respondent, v. Ward La France Truck Corp., Appellant. (Consolidated action.)

Motion referred to the court that rendered the decision. Present — Nolan, P. J., MacCrate, Schmidt, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ. Motion for reargument denied, without costs. Present — Wenzel, Acting P. J., MacCrate, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 1078.]
June 18, 2015 

MEMORANDUM TO: Mark A. Satorius 

 Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS – SECY-15-0047 – REQUEST FOR 

APPROVAL OF STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE 

SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION AND 

DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT TO USE SECTION 161A 

PREEMPTION AUTHORITY 

The Commission has approved authorization for use of Atomic Energy Act Section 161A 

preemption authority by Southern California Edison at its San Onofre Nuclear Generating 

Station and by Pacific Gas and Electric at its Diablo Canyon Power Plant and Diablo Canyon 

specific-license independent spent fuel storage installation. The Commission has authorized 

the Directors of the Offices of Nuclear Reactor Regulation and Nuclear Material Safety and 

Safeguards to complete the required license amendment actions and issue the draft Final 

Confirmatory Orders included in SECY-15-0047, subject to the enclosed edit being made to 

each of the Orders. The staff should coordinate with the Office of the Secretary to finalize and 

issue the letter to the Governor of California concurrent with issuance of the final Confirmatory 

Orders and the associated Federal Register notice. 

Enclosure: 

Changes to the Confirmatory Orders and Letter 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA 

 OPA 

 ODs, RAs, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR 

 
Enclosure

Changes to the Confirmatory Orders and Letter in SECY-15-0047 

Change to the Confirmatory Orders 

1. On page 2, paragraph (2), revise line 1 to read ‘There is reasonable assurance that tThe 

facilities ....’ 

Changes to the Letter to the Governor 

2. On page 1, 1st paragraph, revise lines 1 and 2 to read ‘ ... am writing to informing you 

that of an action the Commission is taking to granting a limited ....’ 

3. On page 1, 1st paragraph, revise lines 4 and 5 to read ‘ ... 1954 (AEA), as amended ....’ 

4. On page 1, 1st paragraph, revise lines 6 and 7 to read ‘ ... notwithstanding local, State, 

local, and certain Federal firearms laws (including regulations) that ....’ 

5. On page 1, 2nd paragraph, revise line 1 and 2 to read ‘ ... ensure the continued 

implementation of effective physical security strategies maintenance of the necessary 

security posture at ....’ 

6. On page 1, 2nd paragraph, revise line 4 to read ‘ ... 161A of the Atomic Energy Act of 

1954, as amended, through ....’ 

7. On page 1, 2nd paragraph, revise lines 6 through 11 to delete everything after ‘ ... issued 

an order ...” and continue the sentence from the following paragraph. 

8. On page 1, 3rd paragraph, revise line 1 to read ‘The order designatinged San Onofre ...’ 

and move this to follow the revised sentence at the end of the 2nd paragraph. 

9. On page 1, 4th paragraph, revise lines 2 and 3 to read ‘ ... facilities by the appropriate 

NRC licensing office. These confirmatory orders will be issued in accordance ....’
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 228 (Monday, November 29, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69396-69397]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26205]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Joint Committee on Standards for Educational 
Evaluation

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 22, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Joint Committee on 
Standards for Educational Evaluation (``JCSEE'') has filed written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of 
business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature 
and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications 
were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting 
the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: Joint 
Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation, Kalamazoo, MI. The 
nature and scope of JCSEE's standards development activities are: The 
development and maintenance of standards for evaluations of educational 
programs, projects, and materials; educational personnel; and other 
critical aspects of education.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-26205 Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
No: II-15-017 April 6, 2015

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416 

NRC Schedules Meeting April 14 

to Discuss Agency’s Assessment of Oconee Nuclear Plant

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials have scheduled an open house for April 14 to provide 

information on the agency’s assessment of the three operating units at the Oconee nuclear plant during 

2014. 

The informal open house is scheduled to begin at 5:30 p.m. in the Oconee World of Energy, 

7812 Rochester Highway, in Seneca, S.C. There will be informational posters, and NRC staff will be 

available to answer questions about the safety performance of the three units at the Oconee plant as 

well as overall NRC oversight and inspection. 

The Oconee plant is located near Seneca, S.C., about 30 miles west of Greenville. It is operated 

by Duke Energy.

Overall, the NRC staff concluded that Oconee Units 1, 2 and 3 operated safely in 2014. There 

was one violation of low to moderate safety significance related to the licensee’s failure to identify and 

correct a crack in a weld on a key safety system in Unit 1 that required additional oversight. However, 

corrective actions were taken by Duke Energy and all three units have since returned to normal 

oversight. All three will continue to receive the detailed routine or baseline inspections conducted at all 

nuclear power plants.

“NRC inspectors continually evaluate each nuclear plant’s safety, and each year we take a 

detailed look at that information to identify any trends and help plan future inspections,” said NRC 

Region II Administrator Victor McCree. “Inspection results are available throughout the year, but these 

annual meetings allow us to talk to local residents and answer any questions they may have.”

Routine inspections are carried out by the NRC resident inspectors assigned to the plant and by 

inspection specialists from the Region II office in Atlanta.

The annual assessment letter for the Oconee plant, as well as current performance information 

for Unit 1, Unit 2 and Unit 3, is available on the NRC website.

.
| **Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) Quarterly Financial Data (Narrative) (Details) (USD $)In Millions, unless otherwise specified** | 3 Months Ended |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
||
| **Effect of Fourth Quarter Events [Line Items]**                                                                                       |           |
| Catastrophe losses, net of reinsurance and including reinstatement premiums                                                            | $ 280          |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Catastrophe losses, net of reinsurance and including reinstatement premiums related to Storm Sandy
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**cna_CatastropheLossesNetOfReinsuranceAndIncludingReinstatementPremiums**Namespace Prefix:**cna_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**debit**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                        |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**us-gaap_EffectOfFourthQuarterEventsLineItems**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Medina  International  Corp.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  September  30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Bradley Colby, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Bradley Colby
-----------------------
Bradley Colby
Chief Executive Officer




<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Medina  International  Corp.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  September  30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Nick DeMare, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Nick DeMare
-----------------------
Nick DeMare
Chief Financial Officer




<PAGE>
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3454 

To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 with respect to maximum enrollment 

and eligible land in the conservation reserve program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2011 

Mrs. ROBY (for herself, Ms. SEWELL, Mr. BACHUS, Mr. BONNER, and Mr. 

ADERHOLT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 with respect to 

maximum enrollment and eligible land in the conservation reserve program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preserving Marginal 

5 Lands and Protecting Farming Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MAXIMUM ENROLLMENT. 

7 Section 1231(d) of the Food Security Act of 1985 

8 (16 U.S.C. 3831(d)) is amended to read as follows: 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3454 IH

1 ‘‘(d) MAXIMUM ENROLLMENT.—The Secretary may 

2 maintain in the conservation reserve at any 1 time, not 

3 more than— 

4 ‘‘(1) during fiscal year 2012, 30,000,000 acres; 

5 ‘‘(2) during fiscal year 2013, 26,000,000 acres; 

6 and 

7 ‘‘(3) during each of fiscal years 2014 through 

8 2017, 24,000,000 acres.’’. 

9 SEC. 3. INELIGIBLE LAND. 

10 Section 1231 of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 

11 U.S.C. 3831) is amended by adding at the end the fol12 lowing new subsection: 

13 ‘‘(j) INELIGIBLE LAND.—Notwithstanding any other 

14 provision of this section, after the date of enactment of 

15 this subsection, the Secretary may not enroll land in the 

16 conservation reserve that is classified as class I or class 

17 II land under the land capability classification system pub18 lished in the National Soil Survey Handbook of the Nat19 ural Resources Conservation Service.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
§ 1011.2 Definitions. As used in this part 1011, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth: ( a ) *Agency.* The entire organization which bears the title Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC).
( b ) *Agency staff.* Employees of the Agency other than the five Commissioners.
( c ) *Commissioner.* An individual who belongs to the collegial body heading the CPSC.
( d ) *Commission.* The Commissioners of the Consumer Product Safety Commission acting in an official capacity.
( e ) *Commission Meeting.* A meeting of the Commissioners subject to the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b. This term is more fully defined in the Commission's regulations under the Government in the Sunshine Act, 16 CFR part 1013.
( f ) *Agency meeting.* A meeting between Agency personnel, including individual Commissioners, and outside parties. This term and the term “outside party” are more fully defined in the Commission's Meeting Policy, 16 CFR part 1012.
#### Emma Branca et al., Respondents, v. Law-Syl Realty Corp., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

In an action by plaintiff wife to recover damages for personal injuries, and by plaintiff husband for expenses, loss of services and consortium, defendant Law-Syl Realty Corp. appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs and against it, rendered upon the verdict of a jury. Judgment of the City Court of Mount Vernon reversed on the facts and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, unless plaintiff Emma Branca stipulate, within ten days after the entry of an order hereon, to reduce the verdict insofar as it is in her favor to the sum of $1,500, in which event the judgment, as so reduced, is unanimously affirmed, without costs. In our opinion the amount of the award for plaintiff Emma Branca was excessive. Present- — Carswell, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldoek, JJ. [See *post,*p. 839.]