alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended December 31,2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,Raouf Y. Halim, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as ofthe date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)         the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

 

(2)         the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods indicated.

 

This Certification has not been, and shall not bedeemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 
| Dated: February 6, 2008 | /s/ RAOUF Y. HALIM      |   |
|------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                         | Raouf Y. Halim          |
|                         | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
No: 14-074 October 27, 2014

CONTACT: Ivonne Couret, 301-415-8200

 

NRC Remains a top performer in Government Survey

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission remains a top place to work in the federal government 

according to the just-released Federal Employee Viewpoint survey, exceeding government-wide results

in a number of key areas.

“This survey confirms what we know from working here: the NRC is a great place to work and 

our employees are among the best in government,” said NRC Chairman Allison M. Macfarlane. Miriam 

Cohen, the NRC’s Chief Human Capital Officer, added, “The results of this year’s survey were 

gratifying, and where this survey gives us data to improve, we will see how we can do even better.”

In each of the major indices used and measured by the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 

NRC ranked either second, third or fourth among all federal agencies. In government-wide 

measurements, the NRC was second in talent management, at 70 percent against 55 percent 

government-wide, and in job satisfaction, the NRC’s score of 72 percent was second the rankings, and 

well above the 55 percent government-wide figure. The NRC tied for third in leadership and knowledge 

management, at 72 percent. The government-wide figure was 58 percent. In the results-oriented 

performance culture area, the NRC was fourth at 62 percent, just three points below the top and well 

ahead of the 51 percent government-wide figure. 

Other notable high scores for the NRC included 90 percent who said they know how their work 

relates to agency goals and priorities, 96 percent who said they were satisfied with their work 

schedules. Some 96 percent said they were willing to put in an extra effort to get a job done, and 89 

percent said their work was important, the quality of work was high and the agency is successful at its 

mission. 

NRC employees also participate in the survey at a far higher rate than their peers in government 

– 68 percent of NRC employees against 46 percent government wide.

The annual survey evaluates the management leadership, employee satisfaction and 

organizational culture of federal agencies. Specifically, it measures employees’ perception of whether, 

and to what extent, their organizations have the types of characteristics typically associated with highperforming, successful organizations. 

The NRC encourages employees to participate, as the results of the survey are a key source for 

obtaining input from staff, continually improving and maintaining an effective workforce.
null

2014-02-18

232.00938

eng - Argued: 2014-02-18. Docket number: 2-13-0333WC
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice (04-022)]

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration announces a meeting of the President's Commission on Implementation of United States Space Exploration Policy.

# DATES:

Wednesday, February 11, 2004, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

National Transportation Safety Board, Conference Center, 429 L'Enfant Plaza, Washington, DC 20954.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Steven Schmidt, Office of the Administrator, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC, (202) 358-1808.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting will be open to the public up to the seating capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as follows: 

—Welcoming remarks by Chairman Pete Aldridge

—Introduction of Commission Members

—Overview of Commission Charter and Goals

—Review of accomplishments of previous commissions, such as Pioneering the Space Frontier (Augustine) and America's Space Exploration Initiative (Stafford)

—Testimony by Federal agencies associated with space exploration

—Comments and discussion

—Closing comments 

The reason for the late notice is that the arrangements for the meeting were made in anticipation of the short time frame in which the Commission is expected to finish its work. However, due to unanticipated delays in getting the charter finalized, and the difficulty of changing meeting arrangements at this time, it is not possible to accommodate the full notice period.

Visitors will be requested to sign a visitor's register.

Michael F. O'Brien,

Assistant Administrator for External Relations, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

[FR Doc. 04-2638 Filed 2-4-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T20:32:53-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
Exhibit
10.1


 


	
  

  	
   

  	
  Stephen M. Carter

  Chief Executive Officer

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  



 


July 31, 2007


H. Patrick Jack

Superior Essex Inc.

1601 Wall Street

Fort Wayne, IN 46803


Dear Pat:


I am pleased that
you have accepted the position of EVP of Superior Essex and President-Essex
Asia Pacific headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia effective August 13, 2007.


You will also be
responsible for establishing a Global Magnet Wire Council, participating both
as a strategic member and as the inaugural Chairman of the Council.  It is anticipated that the Chairman position
would rotate to other members of the Council over time as it evolves.


Your participation
in the Amended and Restated Executive Bonus Plan for 2007 (2007 Plan) will
continue, but will be modified to reflect the change in position, as described
in this  letter.    25% of your bonus at target will
continue to be based on the Company’s performance against the Adjusted
Consolidated EBITDA targets for 2007 established in the 2007 Plan.  Of the
remaining 75% of your bonus at target, 7/12ths will be based on Essex Group
North America’s performance against the Adjusted Operating Income target set in
the 2007 Plan through July 31, 2007, and 5/12ths based on performance
objectives to be established for the remainder of the year with respect to the
Asia Pacific operations by you and I, subject to any required approval of the
Compensation Committee.  Otherwise, your participation, including target
bonus, is unchanged.


Finally, the
Company will provide moving assistance in connection with your relocation from
Ft. Wayne to Atlanta in accordance with the Company’s relocation policy (which
is attached); with one exception, at the Company’s option, the Company will
either agree to increase the amount of the replacement value protection
insurance from the normal $75,000 to $200,000 or reimburse you for such
additional coverage.


As we discussed,
all other terms and conditions of your Amended and Restated Employment
Agreement remain the same.


I look forward to
working with you in our Asia Pacific operations.  If this reflects our
discussions, please acknowledge your acceptance by signing below.


Sincerely,


Stephen M. Carter,

Chief Executive Officer


	
  cc:

  	
   

  	
  Debbie Baker-Oliver

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Barbara Blackford

  



 


Acknowledged and
agreed this 31st day of July, 2007.


 


	
  

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  H. Patrick Jack

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  
	
  150 Interstate North Parkway   ·   Atlanta, Georgia  30339-2101

  
	
  Telephone 770.657.6000  ·   Fax 770.657.6449
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 18, 2022.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 18, 2022

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A22I0217. DEVDAN AMIR YEARWOOD CABBEL v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

20B00092
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL**

**FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Bekem Metals, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zhassulan Bitenov, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2 | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|---|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date: November 14, 2008 | By:                     | /s/ Zhassulan Bitenov |   |
|-------------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
|                    | Zhassulan Bitenov       |
|                    | Chief Financial Officer |
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

KULTAR S. GORAYA, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-1605

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed November 30, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court 

for Lee County; Margaret O. Steinbeck, 

Judge.

Kultar S. Goraya, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Betancourt v. State, 804 So. 2d 313 (Fla. 2001); Carpenter 

v. State, 884 So. 2d 385 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Burttram v. State, 846 So. 2d 1201 (Fla. 

2d DCA 2003); Williams v. State, 907 So. 2d 1224 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). 

KHOUZAM, MORRIS, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
February 5, 2016 

The Honorable Jason Chaffetz 

Chairman, Committee on Oversight 

 and Government Reform 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

Dear Mr. Chairman: 

 On behalf of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), I am responding to the 

January 21, 2015, letter from you and your colleagues requesting information regarding our use 

of Juniper ScreenOS software. I can report that the NRC does not use this software and thus 

has no documentation to provide regarding its use. If you need anything additional, please 

contact me or Eugene Dacus, Director of the Office of Congressional Affairs, at (301) 415-1776. 

Sincerely, 

/RA/ 

Stephen G. Burns
Identical letter sent to: 

The Honorable Jason Chaffetz 

Chairman, Committee on Oversight 

 and Government Reform 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

The Honorable Elijah E. Cummings 

Ranking Member, Committee on Oversight 

 and Government Reform 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

The Honorable Will Hurd 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Information Technology 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

The Honorable Robin Kelly 

Ranking Member, Subcommittee on Information 

 Technology 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

The Honorable Blake Farenthold 

Vice Chairman, Subcommittee 

 on Information Technology 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

The Honorable Ted Lieu 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

The Honorable Paul Gosar 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Little Sioux Corn Processors,L.L.C. (the “Company”) for the three month fiscal quarter ended December 31,2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Gary Grotjohn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.             TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.             Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |   /s/ Gary Grotjohn |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   | Gary  Grotjohn           |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |
|   | Dated:                   |    August 13, 2004 |   |

 

----
EXHIBIT
31.1





SIGNATURES





Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized





ONCOLIN
THERAPEUTICS, INC.





By:  /s/
      J. Leonard IvinsJ.
      Leonard Ivins, Chief Executive OfficerDate:
      May 19, 2010





Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the
capacities and on the dates indicated.





Signature
                  
                  Title
                  
                  Date/s/
      J. Leonard Ivins
                  
                  Chief
      Executive Officer and
                  
                  May
      19, 2010J.
      Leonard Ivins
                  
                  Chairman
      of the Board
### §12655i. Age and citizenship criteria for enrollment

#### (a) Age and citizenship

Enrollment in programs that receive assistance under this division shall be limited to individuals who, at the time of enrollment, are—

(1) not less than 16 years nor more than 25 years of age, except that summer programs may include individuals not less than 14 years nor more than 21 years of age at the time of the enrollment of such individuals; and

(2) citizens or nationals of the United States or lawful permanent resident aliens of the United States.

#### (b) Participation of disadvantaged youth

Programs that receive assistance under this division shall ensure that educationally and economically disadvantaged youth, including youth in foster care who are becoming too old for foster care, youth with disabilities, youth with limited English proficiency, youth with limited basic skills or learning disabilities and homeless youth, are offered opportunities to enroll.

#### (c) Special corps members

Notwithstanding subsection (a)(1), program agencies may enroll a limited number of special corps members over age 25 so that the corps may draw on their special skills to fulfill the purposes of this chapter. Programs are encouraged to consider senior citizens as special corps members.

#### (d) Joint projects with senior citizens organizations

Program agencies shall use not more than 2 percent of amounts received under this division to conduct joint projects with senior citizens organizations to enable senior citizens to serve as mentors for youth participants.

#### (e) Construction

Nothing in subsection (a) shall be construed to prohibit any program agency from limiting enrollment to any age subgroup within the range specified in subsection (a)(1).

(Pub. L. 101–610, title I, §199I, formerly §130, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3146; Pub. L. 102–384, §6, Oct. 5, 1992, 106 Stat. 1456; renumbered §199J, renumbered §199I, Pub. L. 103–82, title I, §101(a), (e)(8)(B), Sept. 21, 1993, 107 Stat. 788, 816.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (c), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 101–610, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3127, known as the National and Community Service Act of 1990, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 12501 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 12550 of this title prior to renumbering by Pub. L. 103–82, §101(a).

#### Amendments

1992—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 102–384 substituted "14" for "15".
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# Summary of NRC Meetings with NEI/Industry Regarding Cumulative Effects of Regulation (CER) on June 9, 2014.

Accession Number: ML14170A364

Date Released: Wednesday, July 2, 2014

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML14170A412 - M. Bailey Memo Re:  Summary of June 2014 Quarterly Meeting with NEI to Discuss Regulatory Issues Regarding the Cumulative Effects of Regulation for Fuel Cycle Facilities. (3 page(s), 6/24/2014)
    - ML14170A413 - Enclosure 1 - June 9, 2014 Meeting Summary with Nuclear Energy Institute. (1 page(s), 6/24/2014)
    - ML14170A408 - Enclosure 2 - Attendees List from June 9, 2014 Meeting with Nuclear Energy Institute. (1 page(s), 6/24/2014)
    - ML14170A410 - Enclosure 3 - June 9, 2014 Meeting with Nuclear Energy Institute,  Slides to Support Quarterly CER Meeting for Fuel Cycle. (6 page(s), 7/3/2014)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Inergy Holdings, L.P. (the Company) on this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended December 31,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, R. Brooks Sherman, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of Inergy Holdings, L.P., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ R. Brooks Sherman, Jr.R. Brooks Sherman, Jr. Chief Financial
OfficerMay 19, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 1203.8 Conditioning environments. Helmets shall be conditioned to one of the following environments prior to testing in accordance with the test schedule at § 1203.13. The barometric pressure in all conditioning environments shall be 75 to 110 kPa (22.2 to 32.6 in of Hg). All test helmets shall be stabilized within the ambient condition for at least 4 hours prior to further conditioning and testing. Storage or shipment within this ambient range satisfies this requirement. ( a ) *Ambient condition.* The ambient condition of the test laboratory shall be within 17 °C to 27 °C (63 °F to 81 °F), and 20 to 80% relative humidity. The ambient test helmet does not need further conditioning.
( b ) *Low temperature.* The helmet shall be kept at a temperature of −17 °C to −13 °C (1 °F to 9 °F) for 4 to 24 hours prior to testing.
( c ) *High temperature.* The helmet shall be kept at a temperature of 47 °C to 53 °C (117 °F to 127 °F) for 4 to 24 hours prior to testing.
( d ) *Water immersion.* The helmet shall be fully immersed “crown” down in potable water at a temperature of 17 °C to 27 °C (63 °F to 81 °F) to a crown depth of 305 mm ±25 mm (12 in. ±1 in.) for 4 to 24 hours prior to testing.