alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. on Form 20-F for the
year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the SEC on the date hereof, I, Chi-Wen Tsai, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 25, 2013



By:

/s/ Chi-Wen TsaiName:

Chi-Wen TsaiTitle:

Chief Executive Officer




|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the company and will be retained by the
company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### John Harding, Appellant, v. F. H. La Guardia, as Mayor of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.

It appears that no action is pending. It also appears that neither the appellant Harding personally,. nor any attorney at law entitled to practice in the courts of this State, acting on his behalf, ever commenced an action in the Supreme Court of this State or took any appeal to this court. Under the circumstances we are required to dismiss the appeal. We have, nevertheless, examined the papers and find that there is no merit to the appeal. Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Rose Moskowitz, Deceased. Julius S. Moskowitz, Appellant; Annette Rich, Respondent.

Johnston, Acting P. J., Adel and MacCrate, JJ., concur; Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm.
PUBLIC MEETING BETWEEN THE U S NUCLEAR PUBLIC MEETING BETWEEN THE

U.S. NUCLEAR

REGULATORY COMMISSION AND INDUSTRY 

REPRESENTATIVES TO DISCUSS BURIED

AND UNDERGROUND PIPING ISSUES AND UNDERGROUND PIPING ISSUES

Changes to GALL Report Revision 2, AMP XI.M41, “Buried 

and Underground Piping and Tanks”

William C Holston

December 5, 2012
ISG Issued ISG Issued

• Changes to the Generic Aging Lessons Changes to the Generic Aging Lessons

Learned (GALL) Report Revision 2 AMP 

XI M41 ‘‘Buried and Underground XI.M41, Buried and Underground

Piping and Tanks’’

• August 2 2012 August 2, 2012• 77 FR 46127• ML12138A296

2
Topics Covered in ISG Topics Covered in ISG

• Include ins

pection recommendations for 

plants not p p

utilizing a cathodic protection system during the period of extended operation; R th d ti t l t i ll i t

•

Remove the recommen

d

ation 

to volume

t

rically inspec

t

underground piping to detect internal corrosion; 

• Recommend that further increases in inspection sample Recommend that further increases in inspection sample

size should be based on an analysis of extent of cause and extent of condition when adverse conditions are 

detected in the initial and subsequent doubled sample detected in the initial and subsequent doubled sample

size, rather than continuing to double the sample size; 

3
Topics Covered in ISG cont Topics Covered in ISG, cont

• Add a recommendation that, where dama

ge to the coatin

g is g 

significant and the damage was caused by non-conforming backfill, an extent of condition evaluation should be conducted to ensure that the as-left condition of backfill in the vicinit

y of 

observed damage will not lead to further degradation; 

• Add specific acceptance criteria for cathodic protection 

surveys;

• Add the specific preventive and mitigative actions utilized by 

the AMP in the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) 

S l t d i ti f th Supplemen

t

description o

f the program; 

• Correct an internal conflict between AMP XI.M41 and AMP 

XI.M36, “External Surfaces Monitoring of Mechanical 

Components.” 

4
Current Actions Current Actions

• Preparing RAIs for all current applicants to Preparing RAIs for all current applicants to

ensure consistency with ISG, main issues:

100 mV cathodic protection (CP) criterion in – 100 mV cathodic protection (CP) criterion in

mixed metal environment

– Number of inspections Number of inspections– Availability and effectiveness criteria for CP, 

85%/80%

– 10 year search of OE if CP not provided

5
Current Actions cont Current Actions, cont

• Reviewing an applicant’s proposal to use Reviewing an applicant s proposal to use

coupons to verify effectiveness of CP

Coupon characteristics

– Coupon characteristics– Coupon placement

Analysis of coupon results

– Analysis of coupon results– Acceptance Criterion

C t t d di t i l

–

Compensa

tory excava

t

e

d direc

t visual

inspections of in-scope buried pipe

6
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)     December 19, 2014








CNA FINANCIAL CORPORATION(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)








Delaware1-582336-6169860(State or other jurisdiction(Commission(IRS Employerof incorporation)File Number)Identification No.)














333 S. Wabash, Chicago, Illinois60604(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)





Registrant's telephone number, including area code     (312) 822-5000








NOT APPLICABLE(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)


Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions ( see General Instruction A.2. below):


[ ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


[ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)


[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))





1


---







ITEM 5.02 DEPARTURE OF DIRECTORS OR CERTAIN OFFICERS; ELECTION OF DIRECTORS; APPOINTMENT OF CERTAIN OFFICERS; COMPENSATORY ARRANGEMENTS OF CERTAIN OFFICERS .





(b) On December 19, 2014, Robert A. Lindemann announced his retirement as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Commercial Lines of Registrant, effective December 31, 2014.  As of the date of this report, no new compensatory or severance arrangements have been entered into with Mr. Lindemann.  On December 19, 2014, Registrant announced that effective January 1, 2015, pending the appointment of a successor to Mr. Lindemann, David Rutkowski, Senior Vice President, Commercial Underwriting, would assume certain of Mr. Lindemann's responsibilities, including day-to-day operational duties, reporting to Thomas Motamed, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Registrant.








The full text of Registrant's press release announcing the matter described herein is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference.





ITEM 9.01 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.





(d) Exhibits:





See Exhibit Index.





2


---







SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.








CNA Financial Corporation(Registrant)Date:  December 19, 2014By/s/ D. Craig Mense(Signature)D. Craig MenseExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer


3


---







EXHIBIT INDEX








Exhibit No.Description99.1CNA Financial Corporation press release, issued December 19, 2014, announcing retirement of Robert A. Lindemann as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Commercial Lines of Registrant, effective December 31, 2014.











4
No: 14-062 September 17, 2014

CONTACT: David McIntyre 301-415-8200 

 

NRC Issues Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement

for Limerick License Renewal

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has published its final supplemental environmental impact 

statement on the license renewal application for the Limerick nuclear power plant in Limerick, Pa. The 

report contains the NRC staff’s conclusion that potential environmental impacts do not preclude 

renewing the plant’s license to operate for an additional 20 years.

Limerick is the site of two boiling-water reactors owned and operated by Exelon Generation Co. 

LLC. The company submitted a license renewal application for the plant on June 22, 2011, to extend 

the licenses for 20 years beyond the current expiration dates of Oct. 26, 2024, for Unit 1 and June 22, 

2029, for Unit 2.

The NRC issued a draft environmental impact statement for public comment in April 2013. The 

final report includes summaries of comments received and the staff’s responses. The final report also 

draws upon the analysis and findings in the NRC’s generic environmental impact statement on license 

renewal; the environmental report submitted by Exelon; and consultation with federal, state, tribal and 

local agencies.

The NRC completed its technical review of the license renewal application and published its 

Safety Evaluation Report in January 2013, with a supplement published in early August 2014. 

Information about the license renewal process and the Limerick renewal application (including the 

safety and environmental reports), is available on the NRC website.

The final environmental impact statement, NUREG-1437, Supplement 49, is also available for 

review at the Pottstown Regional Public Library, at 500 E. High St. in Pottstown, Pa., and at the 

Royersford Free Public Library, at 200 S. 4th Ave. in Royersford, Pa.
#### CITIZENS’ TRUST & SAVINGS BANK v. ZENOR et al.

Tlie Supreme Court is not justified in reversing tire trial court upon a question of fact raised on a motion to open a default.

(Opinion filed, March 23, 1910.)

*211Appeal from Circuit Court, Brown County. Hon. J. H. McCoy, Judge.

Action by the Citizens’ Trust & Savings Bank against L. U Zenor and others. There was a default judgment, and from an order refusing to open the same, defendants appeal.

Affirmed.

' *L. T\ Lammers*and *Campbell*& *Taylor,*for appellant.

*Taubman*& *Williamson,*for respondent.

WHITING, J.

This cause comes before this court upon an appeal from the order of the circuit court refusing to open up a default judgment and allow the defendant to interpose an answer to the complaint herein.

Upon the motion in the court below, the defendant presented affidavits stating facts which, if true, would entitle the plaintiff to the relief prayed for, which was that he be allowed to answer owing to his failure so to do, within the time provided by statute, being due to excusable neglect, etc. The plaintiff presented affidavits, disputing the allegations of defendants affidavits, thus leaving to the trial court the determination of an issue of fact as to whether the attorney for the plaintiff had entered into a verbal stipulation wherein he had granted to the defendant an extension of time within which to answer the complaint herein. The contents of such affidavits are such that there is no chance to say that any of the parties who made such affidavits are merely mistaken, but it is clear that the affidavits on one side or the other are willfully false. If the affidavits submitted by defendant are true, the attorney for the plaintiff, a sworn officer of this court, is guilty of conduct which would brand him as unfit for the profession to which he belongs. The judge of the circuit court, who considered these affidavits, was certainly in a better position to judge of the weight to be given to the same than are the judges of this court, especially inasmuch as he was well acquainted with the said attorney above referred to, and certainly this court would not be justified in reversing the decision of such trial court upon this disputed question of fact.

The order of the trial court is affirmed.

McCOY, J., not .sitting.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 27,2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,Bret W. Johnsen, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurerof the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes ofTitle 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to thebest of my knowledge:

 

(1)   the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and

 

(2)   the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods indicated.

 

This Certification has not been, and shall not bedeemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 
| Dated: August 5, 2008 | /s/ BRET W. JOHNSEN                    |
|----------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                       | Bret W. Johnsen                        |
|                       | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial |
|                       | Officer and Treasurer                  |

 

----
Exhibit 12.2CERTIFICATION OF OUR CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER     I, Eva Chen, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd.(the “Company”);2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for the Company and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the Company, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8238 (June 5,2003), Release No. 33-8392 (February 24, 2004) and Release No.33-8545 (March 2,2005)];  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this reportthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theCompany’s internal control over financial reporting.5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting, which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal controls overfinancial reporting.Date: June 29, 2006       By: /s/ Eva Chen       Name: Eva Chen  Title: Chief Financial Officer
#### § 970.523 Special terms, conditions, and restrictions.

Although the general criteria and standards to be used in establishing terms, conditions, and restrictions for a license are set forth in this part, as referenced in §§ 970.517 through 970.522, the Administrator may impose special terms, conditions, and restrictions for the conservation of natural resources, protection of the environment, or the safety of life and property at sea when required by differing physical and environmental conditions.
EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Carolina Rail Services Company

Carolina Rail Service, Inc.

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning the status of Carolina Rail

Services Company (CRSC) (BA No. 4569) as an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act

(45 U.S.C. § 231 et seq.) (RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C.

§ 351 et seq.) (RUIA), as well as the status of Carolina Rail Service, Inc. (CRSI) as an

employer under the Acts.

Information regarding these two companies was provided in a letter dated February 17, 1995,

from Mr. Sam A. Holcomb, President of CRSI. According to Mr. Holcomb, as well as the

documentation in file, CRSC1, a partnership comprised of Southern Terminal Holdings, Inc.

(the parent company of Carolina Rail Services, Inc.) and Canal Wood Corporation, ceased to

exist as of June 30, 1994, when the partnership was dissolved based on Canal Wood’s purchase

of the interest Southern Terminal. At that time, the employees and assets of CRSC went to

CRSI, a new corporation created by Canal. As ofJuly 1, 1995, employees were paid by CRSI. 

CRSI, described by Mr. Holcomb as a successor employer to CRSC, is an Interstate Commerce

Commission (ICC) certified class HI railroad, which provides rail car switching service for a

class I railroad (Norfolk Southern); leases locomotive power and rights and switches from the 

North Carolina Ports railway Commission; provides 24-hour, seven days per week rail car

switching service to ship loading/unloading operators; and "does not participate in any business 

not connected with the railroad industry."

Based upon the information summarized above, it is determined that Carolina Rail Services 

Company ceased to be a rail carrier employer under the RRA and RUIA effective June 30, 

1994, the date the partnership was dissolved. See §§ 202.11 and 202.12(b) of the Board’s

regulations. It is also determined that Carolina Rail Service, Inc. became a rail carrier employer

under the Acts effective July 1, 1994.

Glen L. Bower

Terome F. Kever

1 CSRC has been found

B.A. No. 4569.

to be an employer covered by the Acts.

BCD 1995-87.1 BA # 4570
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 355 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 355

   For the relief of Pablo Eduardo Perrone and Maria Cristina Lemos.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 19, 2011

  Mr. Filner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   For the relief of Pablo Eduardo Perrone and Maria Cristina Lemos.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR PABLO EDUARDO PERRONE AND 
              MARIA CRISTINA LEMOS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Pablo Eduardo Perrone and 
Maria Cristina Lemos shall each be eligible for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully 
admitted for permanent residence upon filing an application for 
issuance of an immigrant visa under section 204 of such Act or for 
adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Pablo Eduardo Perrone or Maria 
Cristina Lemos enters the United States before the filing deadline 
specified in subsection (c), he or she shall be considered to have 
entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be 
eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Immigration 
and Nationality Act as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Pablo Eduardo Perrone and 
Maria Cristina Lemos, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper 
officer to reduce by 2, during the current or next following fiscal 
year, the total number of immigrant visas that are made available to 
natives of the country of the aliens' birth under section 203(a) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the aliens' birth under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Pablo Eduardo 
Perrone and Maria Cristina Lemos shall not, by virtue of such 
relationship, be accorded any right, privilege, or status under the 
Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Tally Ho Ventures, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, Nigel Gregg, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
      July
      25, 2006











Nigel
      Gregg


Chief
      Executive Officer





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.