alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 217 (Wednesday, November 10, 2004)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 65118]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25064]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 04-3174; MB Docket No. 04-386; RM-10817]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Leesville and New Llano, LA

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects the reply comment date to a proposed 
rule published in the Federal Register of October 20, 2004, regarding 
Radio Broadcasting Services in Leesville and New Llano, Louisiana. The 
wrong date was stated for the reply comment date. This document 
corrects the reply comment date to read as December 14, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rolanda F. Smith, Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

Correction

    In proposed rule FR Doc. 04-23458, published October 20, 2004 (69 
FR 61617) make the following correction.
    On page 61617, in the third column, correct the DATES line to read 
as follows:

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before November 29, 2004, and reply 
comments on or before December 14, 2004.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 04-25064 Filed 11-9-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
### §10006. Compliance

#### (a) Implementation by Secretary

The Secretary shall take all actions consistent with law to effectuate the purposes of this chapter.

#### (b) Accreditation or certification program

A State may utilize an accreditation or certification program administered by a private entity if—

(1) such State delegates the administration of the State accreditation or certification program to such private entity;

(2) such program is approved by the State; and

(3) such program is consistent with the minimum Federal standards promulgated under this chapter for such program.

#### (c) Noncompliance; proposed legislative changes

Absent compliance by the States with the provisions of this chapter within three years after August 13, 1981, the Secretary shall report to the Congress recommendations for legislative changes considered necessary to assure the States' compliance with this chapter.

#### (d) Repealed. Pub. L. 104–66, title I, §1061(b), Dec. 21, 1995, 109 Stat. 719

#### (e) Existing standards and guidelines

Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, in the case of a State which has, prior to the effective date of standards and guidelines promulgated pursuant to this chapter, established standards for the accreditation of educational programs and certification of radiologic technologists, such State shall be deemed to be in compliance with the conditions of this section unless the Secretary determines, after notice and hearing, that such State standards do not meet the minimum standards prescribed by the Secretary or are inconsistent with the purposes of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 97–35, title IX, §981, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 600; Pub. L. 104–66, title I, §1061(b), Dec. 21, 1995, 109 Stat. 719.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1995—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 104–66 struck out subsec. (d) which read as follows: "The Secretary shall be responsible for continued monitoring of compliance by the States with the applicable provisions of this chapter and shall report to the Senate and the House of Representatives by January 1, 1982, and January 1 of each succeeding year the status of the States' compliance with the purposes of this chapter."
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 230 (Wednesday, December 1, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69885-69886]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26446]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service


Notice of Proposed Changes to the Natural Resources Conservation 
Service National Handbook of Conservation Practices

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), USDA.

ACTION: Notice of availability of proposed changes in the NRCS National 
Handbook of Conservation Practices for public review and comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the intention of NRCS to issue a 
series of new or revised conservation practice standards in its 
National Handbook of Conservation Practices. These standards include: 
Closure of Waste Impoundments (Code 360), Cross Wind Trap Strips (Code 
589C), Irrigation Water Management (Code 449), Land Reclamation, 
Landslide Treatment (Code 453), Mine Shaft and Adit Closing (Code 457), 
Pond Sealing or Lining, Compacted Clay Treatment (Code 521D), and Water 
Well (Code 642). NRCS State Conservationists who choose to adopt these 
practices for use within their States will incorporate them into 
Section IV of their respective electronic Field Office Technical Guides 
(eFOTG). These practices may be used in conservation systems that treat 
highly erodible land, or on land determined to be wetland.

DATES: Comments will be received for a 30-day period commencing with 
this date of publication. This series of new or revised conservation 
practice standards will be adopted after the close of the 30-day 
period.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Copies of these standards can be

[[Page 69886]]

downloaded or printed from the following Web site: ftp://ftp-fc.sc.egov.usda.gov/NHQ/practice-standards/federal-register/. Single 
copies of these standards are available from NRCS in Washington, DC. 
Submit individual inquiries in writing to Daniel Meyer, National 
Agricultural Engineer, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Post 
Office Box 2890, Room 6139-S, Washington, DC 20013-2890.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 343 of the Federal Agriculture 
Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 requires NRCS to make available, for 
public review and comment, proposed revisions to conservation practice 
standards used to carry out the highly erodible land and wetland 
provisions of the law. For the next 30 days, NRCS will receive comments 
relative to the proposed changes. Following that period, a 
determination will be made by NRCS regarding disposition of those 
comments, and a final determination of changes will be made.

    Signed in Washington, DC, on November 17, 2004.
Bruce I. Knight,
Chief, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
[FR Doc. 04-26446 Filed 11-30-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P
### §10603. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 10603 was editorially reclassified as section 20103 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
**OFFICE OF**  **THE A-ITORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 

HonorabXemnin H. Brown,Jr. Crlelml **Ziatriat Attorney**  **l%rt Worth,**  **Texae Dear**  **Sir:**

**m taxatlolL**  **requr8t for**  **an .**  **n-es ,xQmptlon**  

### srrltl of Texa6 lanrl Saholarehip 

### ty by Ceotg;s 

### Ewg;gr,Exr”ba8~emea aa buyerfor the Btm1-4of 

### Regents, the earn*),on Deeember 81, vl8ea that thie deed wa8

### not plaard of

RII you asked are aa toIlowtir property In qwetion **exempt** taco tua2. i3aethe ComnLee~onere~ Court of Tarrant County **lmrful** authority to exempt **tliis property**  **from taxa2loa**  **Sor th8**  jreAP **1940** Ana fUtUPch **JWIAP8?**

Bs our opInlcn No. O-W61 we held thi@ 9repertj 20 bs exe& from **taxation.** 

### Aaopy of that opinion ie aWaOh9Qhereto. 

## 130Honorable ***amin** H. Wown, Jr., Page 2

Your **requeot** atate that the **iAnd** vae a66866ed for tuec by the Commi6610ner61Court for the **Jr8AP** 19SQ nne you besir by your question No. 1 tobe aerbiea **as to**  whether ths property is exempt or not for that year, in view of the faot that the deed vae not reoomlecl until Juno 6, 1939. W6 

### fine it **ufmeoarrar~** to anev6r that qurrtlon broaure of the 

### oa88 of StateV. Stor611,et 61, 76 S. V. 

### (2a) 206 (vrlt **refueea),** 

### It **va6** 

### held that when land 

### revortoa to thr **State after**  the 6ale thereofbndvaa then ared **for** publlopurpoee6, that it 

### va6 not rubjeotto **relrure** ma 6al6 to 

### ratiafy a Judgmentfor l 0hooltaxer lrrlsd 1~ th6 lnterlm. This ca6e 16 oltee with approval in the 0606 of Chlldr686Oountyv. State, 92 8. U. t2a) 1011, **by the**  **8UQ** rem* **Oourt** of **thfr** State.

You are thtrrefon **adrl86tl** that the land in quertlon 16 ex6mpt ir4m tuation not only for the rear 1940 ana

### rutureyear6 but 

### that the 6ame **oannot**b6 6eiz6a or 60le for **tuer** due for **the** rear 19S9.

Tmstlng that the foregoing full7 amavers **74~** inquiry, VW APT

FTRST ASSISTANT A'"TORNEYG3C:hlEYfi~ 2. L Y **Your6 very**  **truly ATlWWEX**  **(IEUEEAL OF**  **TEXU**
### §583. Construction of buildings

(a) Authority.—At the request of a federal agency, a mixed-ownership Government corporation (as defined in chapter 91 of title 31), or the District of Columbia, the Administrator of General Services may—

(1) acquire land for a building or project authorized by Congress;

(2) make or cause to be made (under contract or otherwise) surveys and test borings and prepare plans and specifications for a building or project prior to the Attorney General's approval of the title to the site; and

(3) contract for, and supervise, the construction, development, and equipping of a building or project.

(b) Transfer of Amounts.—An amount available to a federal agency or instrumentality for a building or project may be transferred, in advance, to the General Services Administration for purposes the Administrator determines are necessary, including payment of salaries and expenses for preparing plans and specifications and for field supervision.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1111.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 583 | 40:490(c). | June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title II, §210(c), as added Sept. 5, 1950, ch. 849, §5(c), 64 Stat. 582. |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "mixed-ownership Government corporation" are substituted for "mixed-ownership corporation" for consistency in the subsection and with chapter 91 of title 31. The words "chapter 91 of title 31" are substituted for "the Government Corporation Control Act" in section 210(c) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 because of section 4(b) of the Act of September 13, 1982 (Public Law 97–258, 96 Stat. 1067), the first section of which enacted Title 31, United States Code.

In subsection (b), the words "salaries and expenses for preparing plans and specifications and for field supervision" are substituted for "salaries and expenses of personnel engaged in the preparation of plans and specifications or in field supervision, and for general office expenses to be incurred in the rendition of any such service" to eliminate unnecessary words.
---

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Adira Energy Ltd. (the
"Company") for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Ilan Diamond, Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(i) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: February 2, 2011 | /s/
      Ilan Diamond       
|---------------------- | -----------------------------
|                       | Ilan Diamond                 
|                       | Chief Executive Officer      
|                       | (principal executive officer)

---
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE****SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Michael M. Megless, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Spectrum Sciences & Software HoldingsCorp.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the issuer and have: (c) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (d) evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (e) disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the issuer’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.5. The issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and theaudit committee of issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (f) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (g) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.By: /s/MICHAEL M. MEGLESS
August 4, 2015 

MEMORANDUM TO: Mark A. Satorius 

 Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS – SECY-15-0077 – OPTIONS FOR 

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FOR SMALL MODULAR 

REACTORS AND OTHER NEW TECHNOLOGIES 

The Commission has approved the staff’s recommendation to initiate a rulemaking to revise 

regulations and guidance for emergency preparedness (EP) for small modular reactors (SMRs) 

and other new technologies, such as non-light-water reactors (non-LWRs) and medical isotope 

production facilities. 

 

The staff should keep the Commission's previous direction from the Staff Requirements 

Memorandum (SRM) for SECY-14-0038, "Performance-Based Framework for Nuclear Power 

Plant Emergency Preparedness Oversight," in mind. That SRM stated “The staff should be 

vigilant in continuing to assess the NRC's emergency preparedness program and should not 

rule out the possibility of moving to a performance-based framework in the future. The 

Commission notes the potential benefit of a performance-based emergency preparedness 

regimen for small modular reactors.” This rulemaking provides an opportunity for the staff to 

further explore the pros and cons of a performance-based EP framework. 

For any small modular reactor reviews conducted prior to the establishment of a rule, the staff 

should be prepared to adapt an approach to emergency planning zones for SMRs under 

existing exemption processes, in parallel with its rulemaking efforts. 

Some aspects of the technical work on the ongoing “Power Reactors Transition to 

Decommissioning” rulemaking, which also addresses emergency preparedness, and staff 

actions to address Tier 3 post Fukushima items, will inform the technical work on the SMR 

emergency preparedness rulemaking. The staff should coordinate these efforts, as appropriate; 

however, the two rules should be developed separately so as not to delay the decommissioning 

rulemaking, which should be completed by 2019. 

The staff should provide the Commission with a plan and schedule for this rulemaking for 

information within nine months of the date of this SRM. 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA 

 OPA 

 Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 357 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 357

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
             For the relief of Corina de Chalup Turcinovic.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR CORINA DE CHALUP TURCINOVIC.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Corina de Chalup Turcinovic 
shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment 
of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 
upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 
section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Corina de Chalup Turcinovic enters 
the United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection 
(c), she shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and 
shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status 
under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Corina de Chalup Turcinovic, 
the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 
1, during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number 
of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's birth 
under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Corina de 
Chalup Turcinovic shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be 
accorded any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and 
Nationality Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 4, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 357

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

             For the relief of Corina de Chalup Turcinovic.
```
#### Ruth S. Rizzi, Respondent, v. Charles A. Rizzi, Appellant.

*677Defendant’s time to answer is extended to ten days after the entry of the order hereon if plaintiff does not serve an amended complaint. The parties were living separate and apart by mutual consent prior to June 4, 1951. In our opinion, the second cause of action for nonsupport during the period while they were living apart is insufficient in the absence of (1) facts showing that defendant’s payment to plaintiff of $300 a month was inadequate *(Berg*v. *Berg,*289 N. Y. 513; 3 Nelson on Divorce and Annulment [2d ed.], § 32.25, pp. 394 — 395); (2) allegations that plaintiff did not violate the obligations of the marriage before the voluntary separation, and that her return on June 4, 1951, was in good faith and with intent to resume the marital relation and its obligations and to carry them out in the future. *(Batchelor*v. *Batchelor,*295 N. Y. 544.) The absence of similar allegations in the third cause of action for separation on the ground of abandonment makes that cause of action insufficient. *(Solomon*v. *Solomon,*290 N. Y. 337.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2014-0231

 Directorate Identifier: 2013NM163AD

AMM 27-41-00 --- 4/2/13

MPD MTL 1.3 --- 7/8/13

604-27-032, R01 --- 4/29/13

604-27-032 --- 9/10/12

605-27-002, R01 --- 4/29/13

605-27-002 --- 9/10/12

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU LY 15, 2016

NO. 03

- 14

- 00440

- CV

Nancy Marie Peck, Appellant

v.

Wayne Cody Peck, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PE MBERTON, AND BOURLAN D

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the decree signed by the tr i a l court on May 8, 2014. Having reviewed the

record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error in the trial

court’s decree . Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s decree

. The appellant shall pay all

costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.