alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC EXTENDS COMMENT PERIOD ON PROPOSED RULE REVISIONS TO 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION REGULATIONS 

 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has extended the public comment period on 

the proposed rule revisions to the environmental protection regulations, specifically the Summary 

of Findings on National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Issues for License Renewal of 

Nuclear Power Plants and the draft revision of Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) 

for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, NUREG-1437, originally published in 1996. The 

submittal deadline is extended from Oct. 14 to Jan. 12, 2010. 

 

 The public can view the NRC’s original notice on the proposed rule revisions in the 

Federal Register at: http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9-24153.pdf and the original press 

release at: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/news/2009/09-130.html . 

The NRC has held public meetings to obtain comments in Georgia, Massachusetts, 

Illinois and Maryland; the California meetings will be held in October and have been announced 

separately. 

 Comments on the proposed rule, draft revised GEIS and associated documents may be 

submitted via the federal e-Rulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov (Docket I.D. NRC2008-0608); by e-mail to Rulemaking.Comments@nrc.gov ; by mail to Secretary, U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001, ATTN: Rulemakings and 

Adjudications Staff; or by fax to 301-492-3466. Written comments on the draft revised GEIS 

should be sent to: Chief, Rulemaking, Directives and Editing Branch, Division of Administrative 

Services, Office of Administration, Mailstop TWB-05-B01M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001. 

The draft revised GEIS is publicly available at the NRC Public Document Room (PDR), 

located at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md., or from the NRC=s 

Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) at 

http://adamswebsearch.nrc.gov/dologin.htm . The accession number for the draft revised GEIS is 

ML090220654; the draft Regulatory Guide 4.2 Supplement 1, Rev. 1 is ML091620409 and the 

Draft NUREG-1555, Supplement 1, Rev. 1 is ML090230497. Persons with ADAMS questions 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 09-168 October 9, 2009
should contact the NRC=s PDR reference staff by telephone at 1-800-397-4209, or 301-415-

4737, or by e-mail at pdr.resource@nrc.gov . 

### 

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand. 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
#### Walter S. Heilborn v. Eugene R. Rosenbaum.

Motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Present—Clarke, P. J., Scott, Dowling, Smith and Page, JJ.
exv10w1



 





Exhibit 10.1




FIRST AMENDMENT

TO

EMPLOYEE DEFERRED STOCK UNIT PROGRAM




August 6, 2007



WHEREAS, on May 18, 2006, Endocare, Inc. (the “Company”) adopted the Employee Deferred Stock Unit
Program (the “Program”); and



WHEREAS, Section 7.1 of the Program provides that the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board
of Directors (the “Compensation Committee”) shall have the authority, in its sole discretion, to
amend the Program at any time and for any reason it deems appropriate; and



WHEREAS, on August 6, 2007, the Compensation Committee duly approved the amendment set forth below;



NOW, THEREFORE, the Program is hereby amended as follows, effective August 6, 2007:



1. A new Section 3.5 is hereby added to the Program as follows:





     3.5 Maximum Number of Shares. The maximum number of shares of Common Stock
issuable under this Program shall be 2,100,000 shares (adjusted to 700,000 shares upon
effectuation of the planned one-for-three reverse stock split expected to occur on August
20, 2007). Such number automatically shall be adjusted proportionately in the event of any
subsequent change in the outstanding shares of the Company’s Common Stock by reason of a
recapitalization, reclassification, reorganization, stock split, reverse stock split,
combination of shares, stock dividend or similar transaction. Any shares of Common Stock
with respect to Deferred Stock Units that are forfeited pursuant to Section 4.1 shall again
be available for issuance under the Program. Shares of Common Stock issued under the
Program may be authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock, issued shares held in or
acquired for the Company’s treasury or shares reacquired by the Company upon purchase in
the open market.


2. A new Section 7.3 is hereby added to the Program as follows:





     7.3 Term of Program. No additional Deferred Stock Units may be awarded under
this Program after May 18, 2016. However, issuances of Common Stock may be made after May
18, 2016 pursuant to Article 4 of the Program with respect to Deferred Stock Units awarded
on or before such date.



[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]




-1-









 







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned duly-authorized Secretary of the Company hereby executes this
First Amendment to Employee Deferred Stock Unit Program.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	                                                          /s/ Clint B. Davis
 	 
	 	Clint B. Davis 	 
	 	Secretary 	 
	 




-2-
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

J une 16 , 2017 

# Order

Clerk June 16 , 2017

155 657(115)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appell ee

, SC: 155 657

v COA: 32 9456

Wayne CC: 14

- 001097

- FH

TIMOTHY E

. WHITEUS

, Defendant

- Appell ant

. _________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of defendant

- appellant to exceed the

page limit restriction for his reply is GRANTED. The reply submitted on May 19, 2017,

is accepted for filing. +
§ 702.5 Consequences of failure to comply. ( a ) *Civil.* If any person fails to comply with the requirements of § 702.4, BIS may issue a subpoena requiring that person to submit the information called for in the survey. In the case of contumacy or refusal to obey such a subpoena, the U.S. Government may apply for an order by the United States district court in a district where that person resides or transacts business that would compel the person to submit the completed survey.
( b ) *Criminal.* In accordance with 50 U.S.C. app. 2155, any person who willfully fails to comply with § 702.4, may, upon conviction, be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION MANAGEMENT DIRECTIVE (MD)

MD 10.47 RETENTION ALLOWANCE PROGRAM DT-11-16

Volume 10,

Part 2:

Personnel Management

Position Evaluation and Management, Pay Administration, and Leave

Approved By: R. William Borchardt

Executive Director for Operations

Date Approved: November 1, 2011

Issuing Office: Office of Human Resources

Human Resources Policy and Programs Team

Contact Name: Nancy Johns

301-492-2235

Servicing Human Resources Specialist

(names and phone numbers are listed here)

Subject: Elimination of MD 10.47

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Guidance found in Management Directive (MD) 10.44, “Relocation Bonus Program”; 

MD 10.47, “Retention Allowance Program”; and MD 10.48, “Recruitment Bonus Program,” 

has been combined and updated and may be found in MD 10.51, “Recruitment, Relocation, 

and Retention Incentives.” Therefore, MDs 10.44, 10.47, and 10.48 are eliminated.

Directive and Handbook 10.51 provide staff with criteria and guidance for requesting and 

implementing recruitment incentives, relocation incentives, and retention incentives. 

Recruitment, relocation, and retention incentives are monetary tools that may be used to help 

attract and retain employees when the agency would otherwise likely find it difficult to obtain 

suitable candidates or retain employees with critical skills.

Among other changes, this directive and handbook reflect the possibility of larger recruitment 

and relocation incentives, expand the guidance on service periods, and reflect more varied 

options for paying incentives.
### Part G—General Provisions

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 115–271, title VII, §7071(1), Oct. 24, 2018, 132 Stat. 4028, redesignated part F as G.

Pub. L. 105–392, title I, §106(a)(2)(A), Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3557, redesignated part G as F.
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Peter
      Smith, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





(i)       
      The accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended
      June 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)       
      The information in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of Tally-Ho Ventures, Inc. (the
      “Company”).





Date:
      August 22, 2005


By:
      /s/
      Peter Smith


——————————————


Peter
      Smith


President,
      Chief Executive Officer
### SUBCHAPTER III—SPECIAL OR TECHNICAL SERVICES PROVIDED FOR STATE AND LOCAL UNITS OF GOVERNMENT BY FEDERAL DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3546 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3546

   To allow an occupancy preference for veterans in housing projects 
   developed on property of the Department of Veterans Affairs with 
     assistance provided under the Department of Housing and Urban 
Development program for supportive housing for very low-income elderly 
                                persons.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 1, 2011

Mr. Turner of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To allow an occupancy preference for veterans in housing projects 
   developed on property of the Department of Veterans Affairs with 
     assistance provided under the Department of Housing and Urban 
Development program for supportive housing for very low-income elderly 
                                persons.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Senior Veterans Housing Assistance 
Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. OCCUPANCY PREFERENCE FOR VETERANS.

    Notwithstanding section 202 of the Housing Act of 1959 (12 U.S.C. 
1701q) or any other provision of law applicable to assistance under 
such section or to a project assisted under such section, a preference 
may be established for occupancy by veterans who are very low-income 
elderly persons in dwelling units in any supportive housing project for 
the elderly that--
            (1) is provided assistance under such section by the 
        Department of Housing and Urban Development; and
            (2)(A) is or would be located on property of the Department 
        of Veterans Affairs; or
            (B) is subject to an enhanced use lease with the Department 
        of Veterans Affairs.
                                 <all>
```
Pages 30 through 93, consisting of Management's Response, has not been included in this 

posting.
----

**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      OF**

**CHIEF      EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| (1) | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended                March 31, 2007 as filed on the date hereof with the Securities and                Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements                of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as                amended; and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Ted T.H. Jeong      |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Ted                T.H. Jeong          |   |
| Chief                Financial Officer |   |

----
NRC Safety Culture Works

Industrial Radiography Comments

Gayle Staton

Radiation Safety Director

Acuren Inspection, Inc.
Diverse Industry

Providing Radiography for:

Offshore platforms, petro-chemical a

paper mill l t d & b id ill plan

ts, roa

d

&

b

ridge 

construction, aircraft, automotive, thparks, new construction, well loggingname a few. 
Diversity of Radiography 

Companies

• Local small companies (2-4 employe• Specialized company’s specializing 

type of radiography

– E Pi li P t Ex: Pipeline, 

P

e

tro-Ch i l U d 

Chemical, 

U

n

derwa

• Large companies (500 + employees

versed in many types of radiographyusually located in many states.
Diversity of Locations

• Remote Areas• Hard to get to locations• OSHA controlled locations• Client controlled locations• Offshore locations
Diversity of Environmental Haz

• Chemical Hazards (in plants)• Fall Hazards• Explosive Environments• Shoring Hazards• Confined Space Hazards• Underwater Hazards• Lift Hazards
Diversity of Behaviors

There are many different behaviors 

produced by working environments athe safety culture workers have bee

exposed throughout their careers exposed throughout their careers. 

Veterans versus “newcomers” versus 

workers”
Path Forward

• Definition of positive SC as it pertains to t

industrial radiography sector.

• In constantly changing environments In constantly changing environments• Differences between Agreement States a

NRC.
Next Steps

• NRC to define expectations of speci

characteristics and behaviors of a posafety culture in each category (Med

Industrial Nuclear) Industrial, Nuclear).
Resources

• Additional personnel to oversee:

– Writing Procedures/Safe Work Practice– R i t li i Review current policies

– Change Forms– Training – Refresher Training– Auditing Safety Culture
Resources

• Companies will need additional resources 

provide safety culture training for: 

-Company owners/managers

-RSO’s-Workers-Refresher Training 
Recommendations

• NRC should provide guidelines to 

implementation of a positive safety c

• P id k h t li ’ t d 

Provide wor

k

s

hops 

to licensee’s 

to 

d

expectations and implementation.
§ 1201.6 Prohibited stockpiling. ( a ) *Stockpiling.* For the purposes of this section, the term *stockpiling* means manufacturing or importing the affected products between the date of issuance of this part in the Federal Register and the effective date set out below in § 1201.7 at a rate significantly greater (prescribed in paragraph (b) of this section) than the rate at which the affected products were produced or imported during a base period (prescribed in paragraph (c)(2) of this section).
( b ) *Prohibited acts.* Manufacturers and importers of glazing materials, fabricators, and manufacturers or importers of architectural products specified in § 1201.1(a) who incorporate glazing material shall not incorporate glazing materials which do not comply with the requirements of this part 1201 into such products between the date of issuance of this part in the Federal Register and the effective date set out in § 1201.7 below at a rate greater than the rate of production or importation during the base period (defined in paragraph (c)(2) of this section) plus ten percent. For wired glass used in doors or other assemblies subject to this part 1201 and intended to retard the passage of fire, when such doors or other assemblies are required by a Federal, State, local or municipal fire ordinance, the rate of production during the base period may be increased annually by no more than 10 percent.
( c ) *Definitions.* As used in this section: ( 1 ) *Rate of production (or importation)* means the total number of affected architectural products incorporating glazing material not complying with this part manufactured or imported during a stated base period.
( 2 ) *Base period* means, at the option of the manufacturer or importer, any period of 180 consecutive days prior to January 6, 1977, said period to be selected within an interval which begins July 6, 1975.
|                                                                |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                |
| /s/ CHRISTOPHER L. CONWAY                                      |
| Christopher L. Conway                                          |
| Chairman of the Board, President & Chief Executive Officer |
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

Date oflssue: October 30, 2015 

DUE NORTH PRODUCTIONS 

2204 EUCLID ST 

SANTA MONICA, CA 90405-1511 

11.1 •• 11 •••• 1 •• 111 •••• 1.1 •••• 11.1.1 •••• 11 ••• 111.1 •• 1.1 ••• 11 •• 1 

Flight Standards Service 

Aircraft Registration Branch, 

AFS-750 

HAND DELIVERED TO AIC IN THE PD ROOM 

P.O. Box 25504 

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73125-0504 

(405) 954-3116 

Toll Free: 1-866-762-9434 

WEB Address: http://registry.faa.gov 

T158055 This facsimile must be carried in the Aircraft as a Temporary Certificate of 

Registration for 

N454DN MARK SMITH SPREADING WINGS 900 Serial 0900A and is valid until Nov 

29, 2015. 

This is not an airworthiness certificate. For airworthiness information, contact the nearest 

Federal Aviation Administration Flight Standards District Office. 

--------------=- for 

Jana L. Hammer 

Manager, FAA Aircraft Registry, AFS-750 

Federal Aviation Administration 

AFS-750-FAX-4 (01114)
China Public Security Technology, Inc. - Exhibit 10.2 - Prepared By TNT
Filings Inc.





  



Guaranty 


The undersigned hereby guarantee that the Shareholders of
SHENZHEN IASPEC SOFTWARE ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED (iASPEC) will elect 2 (two)
senior managers, who are designated by PUBLIC SECURITY TECHNOLOGY (PRC) CO.,
LTD. to iASPEC, to enter the Board of Directors of iASPEC, in accordance with
the provisions of the MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT, dated as of the date
hereof. 


iASPEC SHAREHOLDERS: 


/s/ Jiang Huai Lin                   


Jiang Huai Lin  (林江怀)

Date: August 1, 2007 

/s/ Jin Zhu Cai                         


Jin Zhu Cai  (蔡金铸)

Date: August 1, 2007 

Address: 

c/o Shenzen iASPEC Software Engineering Company Limited 

Unit D, Block 2, Tian An Cyber Park, Chengongmiao, Futian District Shenzhen,
Guangdong, 518040 People's Republic of China
```
**Exhibit 31.1

          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to
                       Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Jeffrey R. Nieder the Chief Executive  Officer of Centennial  Specialty Foods
Corporation (the "Company"), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

Date:  December 12, 2003
                                          /s/   Jeffrey R. Nieder
                                          Jeffrey R. Nieder
                                          Chief Executive Officer
```
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Jose
      Meleth, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





(i)       
      The accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended
      June 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)       
      The information in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of Tally-Ho Ventures, Inc. (the
      “Company”).





Date:
                August 22, 2005
            
            BY:
                /s/ Jose Meleth
              ——————————————
              Jose
                Meleth
              Chief
                Financial Officer
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-4093

_____________________________

JAMES E. WILSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

Mark W. Moseley, Judge.

June 12, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

James E. Wilson, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.