alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3702 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3702

 To clarify that an authorization to use military force, a declaration 
  of war, or any similar authority shall not authorize the detention 
 without charge or trial of a citizen or lawful permanent resident of 
               the United States and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 16, 2011

   Mr. Garamendi (for himself, Mr. Tonko, Mr. Schiff, Mr. Johnson of 
Georgia, Mrs. Capps, Mr. Heinrich, Mr. Sherman, Mr. Conyers, Ms. Clarke 
of New York, Mr. Carson of Indiana, Mr. Rush, Ms. Hirono, Ms. Hahn, and 
   Mr. Jackson of Illinois) introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To clarify that an authorization to use military force, a declaration 
  of war, or any similar authority shall not authorize the detention 
 without charge or trial of a citizen or lawful permanent resident of 
               the United States and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Due Process Guarantee Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON THE INDEFINITE DETENTION OF CITIZENS AND LAWFUL 
              PERMANENT RESIDENTS.

    Section 4001 of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following:
    ``(b)(1) An authorization to use military force, a declaration of 
war, or any similar authority shall not authorize the detention without 
charge or trial of a citizen or lawful permanent resident of the United 
States apprehended in the United States, unless an Act of Congress 
expressly authorizes such detention.
    ``(2) Paragraph (1) applies to an authorization to use military 
force, a declaration of war, or any similar authority enacted before, 
on, or after the date of the enactment of the Due Process Guarantee Act 
of 2011.''.
                                 <all>
```
Ontology in Performance Evaluation

Edward Dawidowicz

Command and Control Directorate

US Army, CECOM, RDEC

The criteria for measurement of performance of

intelligent systems allow a qualitative

comparison of one system against another. The

performance measurement allows us not only to

judge the achieved level of success or failure, but

also to evaluate cost effectiveness of a particular

design. However, the performance criteria alone

is not sufficient to give an objective evaluation

of the system. A thorough approach requires the

consideration of methods and devices for

performance evaluation. The need for this

thorough approach requires us to take a look at

the ontology of performance of intelligent

systems.

.

Before we attempt to define methods of

performance measurements we need to

reexamine what are the distinctive elements

which make a system intelligent and how do they

relate to each other. These elements require

scrutiny individually and as whole [1] as well as

the mechanisms, by means of which they

interact.

The questions that are worthwhile to examine are

those that reflect processes at a particular level of

system functioning associated with

organizational echelons. An intelligent system is

goal driven. The goals are both internal and

external. The system has to be able to

decompose goals into subgoals giving an

emergence of hierarchy of goals. The system

representation, also hierarchical, plays an

important part in developing the ontology and

requires a distinct attention [3].

Another tempting aspect for discussion is the

topic of ontology of self-referentiality of

intelligent system [2]. Particularly considering

the new and different ways in which intelligent

systems conceptually forms and specifies

representation of objects as a particular

manifestation of self-referentiality. That indeed

requires special attention when formulating

ontology.

A few question arise as we ponder the meaning

of the role of ontology in performance

evaluation:

1. What is the purpose of ontology and how

does it helps us to find the answers we are

looking for?

2. What are the framework, development

methodologies and life-cycle maintenance?

3. Can it provide an objective representation of

performance and associative measurement

devices and methodologies?

4. Should the ontology reflect the system

functioning and collaboration with other

systems?

5. An intelligent system has a user who

interacts with it. A user maybe another

system or a human. Does that mean that we

need two ontologies, one for the user and the

other for a system under evaluation?

6. And finally when we are addressing

complex systems, and an intelligent system

is a complex system, should we not consider

ontologies of many hierarchical levels [3]?

References:

1. John H. Holland, "Emergence: From Chaos

to Order", Helix Books

2. Roger Penrose, "Shadows of the Mind",

Oxford university press, 1994

3. Alexander Meystel, James Albus, "

Intelligent Systems: Architecture, Design

and Control, Wiley, NY, 2002.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECURITIES ACT RULES 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14(a)

I,
Jon E. Kirchner, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of DTS, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Date: May 12, 2008 |  |     |                                                                        
|------------------ |  | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                   |  | By: | /s/JON E. KIRCHNERJon E. Kirchner President and Chief Executive Officer

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Salomon Smith Barney Orion Futures Fund L.P. (the"Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the periodending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr., Chief Financial Officer and Director ofCitigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/    Daniel R. McAuliffe,Jr.

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

Daniel R.McAuliffe, Jr.Citigroup Managed Futures LLC Chief FinancialOfficer and Director

August 9,2005

----
### Part A—Duties of the Secretary of Labor
No: 15-060 September 30, 2015

CONTACT: Ivonne Couret, 301-415-8200

NRC Awards FY15 Grants

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has awarded $16.6 million in grants to academic 

institutions in fiscal year 2015. The grants are used for scholarships, fellowships, trade school and 

community college scholarships and faculty development. 

Congress authorized the NRC to provide federal funding opportunities to qualified academic 

institutions to encourage careers and research in nuclear, mechanical and electrical engineering, health 

physics and related fields to meet expected future workforce needs. 

This fiscal year, the NRC awarded grants to more than 30 higher education institutions, 

including Minority Serving Institutions. 

The NRC announces grant opportunities on www.grants.gov, which helps the public find and 

apply for federal funding opportunities. A panel of expert reviewers evaluates all the grant proposals. 

The panel composition is diverse, with most reviewers having both experience reviewing proposals for 

government agencies and advanced credentials in nuclear engineering, health physics, radiochemistry 

or related disciplines. Each panelist has to certify that they do not have any conflict of interest for the 

proposals they evaluate. 

With the award of the FY15 grants, the NRC has awarded more than $138 million since the 

program began in 2007. The complete list of grants awarded and general information about the grant 

program are posted on the NRC’s website.
§ 702.3 Confidential information. This section implements section 705(d) of the DPA. ( a ) BIS deems all information submitted in response to a survey issued pursuant to this part to be confidential.
( b ) Any person submitting information in response to a survey issued pursuant to this part may request confidential treatment of that information.
( c ) The President's authority under the DPA to protect confidential information has been delegated to the Under Secretary for Industry and Security. The information described in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section shall not be published or disclosed unless the Under Secretary for Industry and Security determines that the withholding thereof is contrary to the interest of the national defense.
( d ) Any person convicted of willfully violating the prohibition in paragraph (c) of this section may be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 366 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.366

                      One Hundred Twelfth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the fourth day of January, two thousand and eleven

                                 An Act

 
 To provide for an additional temporary extension of programs under the 
 Small Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, and 
                           for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF PROGRAMS 
UNDER THE SMALL BUSINESS ACT AND THE SMALL BUSINESS INVESTMENT ACT OF 
1958.
    (a) In General.--Section 1 of the Act entitled ``An Act to extend 
temporarily certain authorities of the Small Business Administration'', 
approved October 10, 2006 (Public Law 109-316; 120 Stat. 1742), as most 
recently amended by section 1 of Public Law 111-251 (124 Stat. 2631), 
is amended by striking ``January 31, 2011'' each place it appears and 
inserting ``May 31, 2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on January 30, 2011.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
### **CHAPTER 18—YOUTH MEDALS**

Sec.
1921.
Establishment of medals for bravery; rules and regulations; conditions governing awards.
1922.
Establishment of medals for character and service; condition governing awards.
1923.
Names of medals; presentation.
1924.
Certificate of commendation accompanying awards; limitation on number of yearly awards.
1925.
Omitted.
1926.
Authorization of appropriations.
### §10304. Research concerning water resource-related problems deemed to be in national interest

#### (a) Grants; matching funds

(1) In addition to the grants authorized by section 10303 of this title, the Secretary is authorized to make grants, on a dollar-for-dollar matching basis, to the institutes established under such section, as well as other qualified educational institutions, private foundations, private firms, individuals, and agencies of local or State government for research concerning any aspect of a water resource-related problem which the Secretary may deem to be in the national interest. Such grants shall be made with such advice and review by peer or other expert groups of appropriate interdisciplinary composition as the Secretary deems appropriate on the basis of the merits of the project and the need for the knowledge such project is expected to produce upon completion.

(2) Research funded under this section should to the extent possible utilize the best qualified graduate students so the Nation profits from the education and training benefits resulting from the use of the latest in technological developments in solving water problems.

#### (b) Applications for grants

Each application for a grant under this section shall state the nature of the project to be undertaken, the period during which it will be pursued, the qualifications of the personnel who will direct and conduct it, the importance of the project to the Nation as well as to the region and State concerned, its relation to other research projects previously or currently being pursued, and the extent to which it will provide an opportunity for the training of water resources scientists.

#### (c) Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary the sum of $10,000,000 for the purpose of carrying out this section for each of the fiscal years ending September 30, 1985, through September 30, 1995, such sums to remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 98–242, title I, §105, Mar. 22, 1984, 98 Stat. 100; Pub. L. 101–397, §1(i), (j), Sept. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 853.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1990—Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 101–397, §1(i), struck out par. (3) which read as follows: "In cases where the Secretary determines, in accordance with criteria established by him, that research under this section is of a basic nature which would not otherwise be undertaken, the Secretary may approve grants under this section with a matching requirement other than that specified in paragraph (1) of this subsection."

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 101–397, §1(j), substituted "$10,000,000" for "$20,000,000" and "1995" for "1989".
No: 15-057 September 28, 2015

CONTACT: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200

NRC Renews Operating License of Sequoyah Nuclear Plant in Tennessee

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has renewed the operating licenses of Units 1 and 2 at the 

Sequoyah nuclear power plant in Soddy-Daisy, Tenn., for an additional 20 years.

The Sequoyah plant, located about 16 miles northeast of Chattanooga, has two pressurized 

water reactors. The renewed licenses authorize Unit 1 to operate through Sept. 17, 2040, and Unit 2 

through Sept. 15, 2041. The Tennessee Valley Authority applied to renew the licenses on Jan. 7, 2013. 

The NRC staff’s review of the application proceeded on two tracks. A safety evaluation report was 

issued Jan. 29, 2015, and supplemented earlier this month. A supplemental environmental impact 

statement was issued March 20, 2015. These documents, as well as other information about the 

Sequoyah license renewal, are available on the NRC website. The NRC’s Advisory Committee on 

Reactor Safeguards also reviewed the staff’s work.

Renewal of the Sequoyah operating licenses brings to 78 the number of commercial nuclear 

power reactors with renewed licenses. Applications for an additional 16 renewals are currently under 

review. Information about these reviews can be found on the NRC website.
§ 460.19 Savings claims. ( a ) If you say or imply in your ads, labels, or other promotional materials that insulation can cut fuel bills or fuel use, you must have a reasonable basis for the claim. For example, if you say that insulation can “slash” or “lower” fuel bills, or that insulation “saves money,” you must have a reasonable basis for the claim. Also, if you say that insulation can “cut fuel use in half,” or “lower fuel bills by 30%,” you must have a reasonable basis for the claim.
( b ) If you say or imply in your ads, labels, or other promotional materials that insulation can cut fuel bills or fuel use, you must make this statement about savings: “Savings vary. Find out why in the seller's fact sheet on R-values. Higher R-values mean greater insulating power.”
( c ) If you say or imply that a combination of products can cut fuel bills or use, you must have a reasonable basis for the claim. You must make the statement about savings in paragraph (b) of this section. Also, you must list the combination of products used. They may be two or more types of insulation; one or more types of insulation and one or more other insulating products, like storm windows or siding; or insulation for two or more parts of the house, like the attic and walls. You must say how much of the savings came from each product or location. If you cannot give exact or approximate figures, you must give a ranking. For instance, if your ad says that insulation and storm doors combined to cut fuel use by 50%, you must say which one saved more.
( d ) If your ad or other promotional material is covered by § 460.18 (a), (b), (c), or (d), and also makes a savings claim, you must follow the rules in §§ 460.18 and 460.19. However, you need not make the statement explaining R-value in § 460.18(a).
( e ) Manufacturers are liable if they do not have a reasonable basis for their savings claims before the claim is made. If you are not a manufacturer, you are liable only if you know or should know that the manufacturer does not have a reasonable basis for the claim.
( f ) Keep records of all data on savings claims for at least three years. For the records showing proof for claims, the three years will begin again each time you make the claim. Federal Trade Commission staff members can check these records at any time, but they must give you reasonable notice first.
( g ) The affirmative disclosure requirements in this section do not apply to television or radio advertisements or to space-constrained advertisements. “Space-constrained advertisement” is defined in § 460.18(e).
[44 FR 50242, Aug. 27, 1979, as amended at 51 FR 39651, Oct. 30, 1986; 70 FR 31276, May 31, 2005; 84 FR 20790, May 13, 2019]
Exhibit 10.26(b)
 AMENDMENT TO NOTE AGREEMENT
 Amendment Note Agreement Company
 RECITALS
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE
 Defined Terms; References
 Amendment.
 Common Stock Repurchase
 Governing Law




---



##### 



Counterpart; Facsimile
 Effect of Amendment
 [Signature Pages Follow]
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 ENDEAVOUR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION/s/ J. Michael KirkseyJ. Michael KirkseyChief Financial Officer




---



##### 



Signatures
 /s/Gaurav Bhandari

Gaurav BhandariGoldman, Sachs Investment Partners Master Fund, L.P.
 /s/ Terence Aquino

Terence Aquino
    
    /s/ Mark J. Vanacore

Mark J. VanacoreChief Financial Officer
    
    Trading ManagerEton Park Capital Management, LP
    
    High Bridge International, LLC./s/ Terence Aquino

Terence Aquino
    
    /s/ Martin Kobinger

Martin KobingerChief Financial Officer
    
    Investment ManagerEton Park Master Fund, LTD.
    
    Capital Ventures International/s/ Mary Lee

Mary Lee
    
    /s/ R. Jeffrey Bruce

R. Jeffrey BruceChief Legal Officer
    
    Vice PresidentTPG-Axon Partners, L.P.
    
    Professional Life and Casualty/s/ Mary Lee

Mary Lee
    
    /s/ J. Baker Gentry, Jr.

J. Baker Gentry, Jr.Chief Legal Officer
    
    Investment AdvisorTPG-Axon Partners(Offshore), LTD.
    
    HBK Master Fund, L.P.
 /s/ Paul Smith

Paul SmithGeneral CounselMagnetar Capital Master Fund, LTD.
Exhibit 32

Certification pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Donald Mindiak, President and Chief Executive Officer and Kenneth Walter, Chief Financial Officer of BCB Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) each
certify in his capacity as an officer of the Company that he has reviewed the quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 and that to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as
amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



|                |  |                                      
|--------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|August 16, 2010 |  | /s/ Donald Mindiak                   
|                |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                | 
|August 16, 2010 |  | /s/ Kenneth Walter                   
|                |  | Chief Financial Officer