alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

                             CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
                                EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                              Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
                                Section 1350, as
                               adopted pursuant to
                               Section 906 of the
                              Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
                                      2002

         In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange
         Commission of the Annual Report of Microwave Transmission Systems, Inc.
         (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB, as amended, for the period ending
         December 31, 2002 (the "Report"), I, P. David Spurlin, Chief Executive
         Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
         adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
         to the best of my knowledge:

               (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
               13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

               (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
               all material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.

         /s/ P. David Spurlin
         --------------------
         P. David Spurlin, President

         June 2, 2004



<PAGE>


                             CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
                                FINANCIAL OFFICER

                              Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
                                Section 1350, as
                               adopted pursuant to
                               Section 906 of the
                              Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
                                      2002

         In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange
         Commission of the Annual Report of Microwave Transmission Systems, Inc.
         (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB, as amended, for the period ending
         December 31, 2002 (the "Report"), I, D. Susan King, Chief Financial
         Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
         adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
         to the best of my knowledge:

               (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
               13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

               (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
               all material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.

         /s/ D. Susan King
         ------------------
         D. Susan King, Chief Financial Officer

         June 2, 2004



<PAGE>
#### § 1025.52 Adoption of initial decision.

The Initial Decision and Order shall become the Final Decision and Order of the Commission forty (40) days after issuance unless an appeal is noted and perfected or unless review is ordered by the Commission. Upon the expiration of the fortieth day, the Secretary shall prepare, sign, and enter an order adopting the Initial Decision and Order, unless otherwise directed by the Commission.
#### § 716.7 Samples.

The owner, operator, occupant or agent in charge of a facility must provide a sample as provided for in the Convention and the Act and consistent with requirements set forth by the Director of the United States National Authority in 22 CFR part 103. Analysis will be restricted to verifying the absence of undeclared scheduled chemicals, unless otherwise agreed after consultation with the facility representative.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trump Casino Holdings, L.L.C., and Trump Casino Funding, Inc. (the Companies) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald J. Trump, the Chief Executive Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|/s/ Donald J. Trump                                                                                
|                                                                                                   
|Donald J. Trump Chief Executive Officer of Trump Casino Holdings, L.L.C. Trump Casino Funding, Inc.



May 14, 2004
Air Resources Board 

Mary D. Nichols, Chairman 

Linda S. Adarns 1001 I Street P.O. Box 2815 Arnold Schwarzenegger Secretary for Sacramento, California 9581 2 www.arb.ca.gov Governor 

March 16,2009 

Ms. Laura Yoshii 

Acting Regional Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 9 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, California 941 05 

Dear Ms. Yoshii: 

The Air Resources Board (ARB) is transmitting to the United States Environmental 

Protection Agency the California Regional Haze Plan (Plan) for approval. ARB determined 

that the Plan meets the Clean Air Act requirements and approved it on January 22, 2009 

as a revision to the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). 

The attachment contains all of the required elements including two hard copies of the 

following materials, with an exact electronic copy of each: 

1. Public notice evidence and transcript for the ARB Public Hearing to consider 

approval of the Plan; 

2. ARB Resolution 09-04 adopting the Plan as a revision to the SIP; and 

3. Califorrria Regional Haze Plan. 

If you have any questions, please call Ms. Lynn Terry, Deputy Executive Officer, at 

(916) 322-2739, or have your staff contact Ms. Karen Magliano, Chief, Air Quality Data 

Branch, at (916) 322-7137. 

Sincerely, 

James N. ~oldste@! 

Executive Officer '' 

The energy challenge facing California is real. Every Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption. 

For a list of simple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs, see our website: http://www.arb.ca.aov. 

California Environmental Protection Agency 

Printed on Recycled Paper 
Ms. Laura Yoshii 

March 16, 2009 

Page 2 

Attachments 

cc: (without attachment) 

Lynn Terry, ARB 

Karen Magliano, ARB
§ 1632.2 Purpose, scope, and applicability. ( a ) *Purpose.* ( 1 ) This standard prescribes requirements for testing of prototype designs of mattresses and mattress pads before the sale in commerce or the introduction in commerce of any mattress or mattress pad which is subject to the standard. The standard prescribes a test to determine the ignition resistance of a mattress or a mattress pad when exposed to a lighted cigarette.
( 2 ) The standard sets forth a test at § 1632.6 which may be used to classify ticking materials for resistance to cigarette ignition.
( 3 ) The standard sets forth a test at § 1632.7 which may be used to demonstrate that the substitution of tape edge materials will not reduce the ignition resistance of a mattress prototype or a mattress pad prototype.
( b ) *Scope.* ( 1 ) All mattresses, as defined in § 1632.1(a), and all mattress pads, as defined in § 1632.1(b), manufactured or imported after the effective date of this amendment are subject to the requirements of the standard as amended.
( 2 ) All mattresses, as defined in § 1632.1(a), and all mattress pads, as defined in § 1632.1(b), manufactured or imported after June 22, 1973, and before the effective date of this amendment are subject to those requirements of the Standard for the Flammability of Mattresses (and Mattress Pads) (16 CFR part 1632) which were in effect before the effective date of this amendment.
( 3 ) Manufacturers or importers desiring to use the ticking substitution procedure provided in § 1632.6 may classify the ticking being used on each mattress prototype before or after the effective date of this amendment using the test procedure set forth in that section.
( 4 ) One-of-a-kind mattresses and mattress pads may be excluded from testing under this standard in accordance with rules established by the Consumer Product Safety Commission. (See § 1632.31(f): exemption for mattresses and mattress pads prescribed by a physician.)
( c ) *Applicability.* ( 1 ) The requirements for prototype testing prescribed by this standard are applicable to each “manufacturer” (as that term is defined in § 1632.1(i)) of mattresses or mattress pads subject to the standard which are manufactured for sale in commerce. The requirements of this standard for prototype testing are also applicable to all other persons or firms initially introducing mattresses or mattress pads into commerce, including importers; each such firm shall be deemed to be a “manufacturer” for purposes of this standard.
( 2 ) The test at § 1632.6 for classification of ticking materials may be used by manufacturers of mattresses or mattress pads and by manufacturers of ticking materials. The test at § 1632.7 may be used by manufacturers of mattresses to demonstrate that substitution of tape edge materials will not reduce ignition resistance of a mattress prototype or a mattress pad prototype. Use of the tests in §§ 1632.6 and 1632.7 is optional.
§ 1109.11 Component part testing for paint. ( a ) *Generally.* The Commission will permit certification of a consumer product, or a component part of a consumer product, as being in compliance with the lead paint limit of part 1303 of this chapter or the content limits for paint on toys of section 4.3 of ASTM F 963-11 or any successor standard of section 4.3 of ASTM F 963-11 accepted by the Commission if, for each paint used on the product, the requirements in § 1109.5 and paragraph (b) of this section are met.
( b ) *Requirement.* For each paint used on the product: ( 1 ) Unless using the test method ASTM F 2853-10 to test for lead in paint, all testing must be performed on dry paint that is scraped off of a substrate for testing. The substrate used need not be of the same material as the material used in the finished product or have the same shape or other characteristics as the part of the finished product to which the paint will be applied; and
( 2 ) The tested paint is identical in all material respects to that used in production of the consumer product. The paint samples to be tested must have the same composition as the paint used on the finished product. However, a larger quantity of the paint may be tested than is used on the consumer product in order to generate a sufficient sample size. The paint may be supplied to the testing laboratory for testing either in liquid form or in the form of a dried film of the paint on any suitable substrate.
[76 FR 69580, Nov. 8, 2011, as amended at 80 FR 61732, Oct. 14, 2015]
No: 14-012 February 28, 2014

CONTACT: Maureen Conley, 301-415-8200 

NRC Issues Final Environmental Impact Statement

On Ross Uranium Recovery Project in Wyoming

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued the final supplemental environmental impact 

statement (SEIS) for the proposed Ross in-situ uranium recovery (ISR) project in Crook County, Wyo. 

The report concludes there are no environmental impacts that would preclude licensing the facility.

Strata Energy Inc. submitted a license application for the facility on Jan. 4, 2011. The license 

would authorize Strata to construct and operate an ISR facility and well fields at the Ross site, and 

ultimately to restore aquifers, decommission the facility, and reclaim the site. The Ross project would 

use the ISR process to recover uranium from underground ore and convert the recovered uranium into 

yellowcake for use in the production of nuclear fuel. 

The NRC report analyzes environmental impacts specific to the Ross project and mitigation 

strategies to reduce or avoid adverse effects on the surrounding environment. The staff in January 2014 

completed a separate technical review of the safety aspects of the application. That review concluded 

that Strata’s application complies with NRC regulations. 

The NRC is also reviewing the project’s potential impacts on historic and cultural resources. 

Once the staff has finished that process as required by the National Historic Preservation Act, the NRC 

can issue a license. The staff is finalizing a programmatic agreement that defines how we will continue 

to address effects on historic properties into the future. Later this year, an NRC Atomic Safety and

Licensing Board will hold a hearing on environmental contentions.

The SEIS for the proposed Ross uranium recovery project is available on the NRC website as 

Supplement 5 to NUREG-1910, Generic Environmental Impact Statement for In-Situ Leach Uranium 

Milling Facilities. More information on the application and the staff’s review is also available on the 

NRC website.
### Part B—Space Shuttle
§ 1502.33 Official notice. ( a ) Official notice may be taken of such matters as might be judicially noticed by the courts of the United States or of any other matter peculiarly within the general knowledge of CPSC as an expert agency.
( b ) If official notice is taken of a material fact not appearing in the evidence of record, a participant, on timely request, will be afforded an opportunity to show the contrary.
### **CHAPTER 4—VIRUSES, SERUMS, TOXINS, ANTITOXINS, ETC.**
| (1)  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|               |            |                                       |   |
|--------------------|-----------------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|               | By:   | /s/ Gadi Aner                              |   |
|               |            | Gadi Aner                                  |   |
|               |            | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman  |   |
|               |            |                                       |   |
|               |            |                                       |   |
|               | By:   | /s/ Gabby Klausner                         |   |
|               |            | Gabby Klausner                        |   |
|               |            | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer      |   |
|               |            |                                       |   |
| Date: May 23, 2011 |            |                                       |   |

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
MediciNova, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Shintaro Asako, as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



Date: May 12, 2008By:

/s/    SHINTARO ASAKOShintaro Asako Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and such certification is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 1420.2 Definitions. In addition to the definitions in section 3 of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2052), the following definitions apply for purposes of this Part 1420. ( a ) *All terrain vehicle or ATV* means: ( 1 ) Any motorized, off-highway vehicle designed to travel on 3 or 4 wheels, having a seat designed to be straddled by the operator and handlebars for steering control; but
( 2 ) Does not include a prototype of a motorized, off-highway, all-terrain vehicle that is intended exclusively for research and development purposes unless the vehicle is offered for sale.
( b ) *ATV action plan* means a written plan or letter of undertaking that describes actions the manufacturer or distributor agrees to take to promote ATV safety, including rider training, dissemination of safety information, age recommendations, other policies governing marketing and sale of the ATVs, the monitoring of such sales, and other safety related measures, and that is substantially similar to the plans described under the heading “The Undertakings of the Companies” in the Commission Notice published in the Federal Register on September 9, 1998 (63 FR 48199-48204).
AFS-13-395-E

July 1, 2013

 Exemption No. 10816

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2013-0483

Ms. Elizabeth Swarthout

Parent of John Swarthout

215 Winding Way

Horseheads, NY 14845

Dear Ms. Swarthout:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and lists the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter received May 26, 2013, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of John Swarthout for an exemption from § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) of Title 14, Code 

of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow John to exceed the 

specified weight limit for an FAA-approved child restraint system (CAReS, manufactured by 

AmSafe Corporation) during use of that child restraint system (CRS) aboard a United States 

(U.S.) aircraft.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to John.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9834 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that numerous people with physical challenges had previously completed flights using 

restraint systems that addressed unique physical needs regarding safety, support, and security 

in the same manner of operations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the 
2

petition, if granted, would not set any new precedents regarding the use of restraint systems by 

persons with disabilities.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

• they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed grant.

• the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemption also apply to the 

situation you present; and 

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant John Swarthout an exemption from § 121.311(b). In 

addition, any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while John is aboard 

its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b) to the extent necessary to allow 

him to use an FAA-approved CRS aboard a U.S. aircraft.

All operations under this exemption must be conducted with at least one of John’s parents or a 

caregiver accompanying him. John Swarthout may only occupy a passenger seat with no 

passenger seated behind him. In addition, John’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of this 

exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 hours 

before the date of each flight.

This exemption terminates on June 30, 2018, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John M. Allen

Director, Flight Standards

 Service

Enclosure
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS ADDED
BY


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Marco Community Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“Report”), I, Thomas J. Mitchusson, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of and for the period covered by the
report.

















Date:
            May 4, 2009
            
            By:
            /s/ Thomas J.
    MitchussonThomas
      J. Mitchusson, Senior VicePresident
      and Principal Financial Officer