alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC PUBLISHES REGULATORY ISSUE SUMMARY ON REINTEGRATION OF 

SECURITY INTO REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROCESS ASSESSMENTS 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is informing operators of U.S. commercial nuclear 

power plants that information on security issues will be reintegrated into the agency’s Reactor 

Oversight Process (ROP) assessment program, starting on July 1.

The NRC currently treats safety and security inputs to the ROP Action Matrix separately. 

Reintegrating security information, as described in a Regulatory Issue Summary (RIS) issued 

today, will provide for a more holistic representation of licensee performance. This will allow 

NRC staff to more fully leverage supplemental inspection procedures and resources.

The integrated assessment process will provide for increased transparency through a 

complete representation of licensees’ performance. Under the new provisions, licensees will 

receive a single assessment letter that will cover all seven ROP cornerstones. This will begin 

with the 2012 mid-cycle performance assessments, scheduled for August, and continue with 

subsequent assessments.

In addition, the agency’s ROP public website will show information on all seven ROP 

cornerstones when the quarterly updates to Action Matrix inputs are posted. The website will 

display security inputs in one of two ways. Issues of very low security significance will show up 

as “green” findings. Issues of greater security significance will show up as “blue” findings, 

regardless of their actual significance level. Specific information about all security performance 

deficiencies will remain non-publicly available, consistent with current NRC policy. The change 

will be apparent during the quarterly updates posted in August.

The RIS is available on the NRC website, and through the agency’s ADAMS document 

database, by entering accession number ML11326A039. 

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 12-024 March 15, 2012
No: II-13-062 December 6, 2013

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416 

NRC Schedules Meeting to Discuss Results of License Renewal 

Inspection at Sequoyah Nuclear Power Plant 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a meeting for Tuesday, Dec. 17, to 

discuss the results of an inspection related to a request to extend the operating license for the Sequoyah

nuclear power plant.

The Tennessee Valley Authority, which owns and operates the plant near Soddy-Daisy, Tenn., 

about 16 miles northeast of Chattanooga, has applied for a 20-year license extension for the plant’s two 

units. The inspection to be discussed on Dec. 17 is part of the NRC’s ongoing review of that 

application.

The meeting is scheduled for 5:30 p.m. in the Sequoyah plant’s training center auditorium,

located at 2460 Igou Ferry Road in Soddy-Daisy. After a discussion of the inspection results, NRC staff 

members will be available to answer questions about the review.

Under NRC regulations, the original operating license for a nuclear power plant is issued for 40 

years. Companies may apply to renew those licenses for an additional 20 years if agency requirements 

are met.

TVA applied to the NRC in January 2013 to renew the licenses for the two Sequoyah reactors.

If approved, the license for Sequoyah Unit 1 would be extended to Sept. 17, 2040, and Unit 2 would be 

extended to Sept. 15, 2041. 

The NRC license renewal review process, including inspections, helps ensure that a plant 

manages the effects of aging on key safety systems, structures and components with thorough 

monitoring and maintenance programs during the additional 20 years of operation. The NRC inspection 

team looked at those programs and also assessed the processes used to decide what equipment and 

structures are required to be monitored for aging effects. 

No final licensing decisions for reactors, including license renewal, will be made by the NRC 

until the waste confidence rule is completed. The NRC’s waste confidence rule, which addresses 

storage of spent nuclear fuel after a plant ceases operation, is expected to finalized in September 2014.

A copy of the Sequoyah license renewal application is available on the NRC’s website.. 

Additional information on the NRC’s license renewal review process is available.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Good Buddy's Coffee
Express, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB (the "Report"), I,
Scott Massey, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



/s/ Scott Massey
------------------------------------
Scott Massey
Chief Executive Officer  and
Chief Financial Officer

August 17, 2007



<PAGE>
### SUBCHAPTER II—COMMISSION
### §§10418, 10419. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 10418 and 10419 were omitted in the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 111–320, title II, §201, Dec. 20, 2010, 124 Stat. 3484.

Section 10418, Pub. L. 98–457, title III, §318, as added Pub. L. 103–322, title IV, §40261, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1935; amended Pub. L. 105–392, title IV, §407(a), Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3589; Pub. L. 106–386, div. B, title IV, §1403, Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1514; Pub. L. 108–36, title IV, §413, June 25, 2003, 117 Stat. 830, related to demonstration grants for community initiatives.

Section 10419, Pub. L. 98–457, title III, §319, as added Pub. L. 106–386, div. B, title II, §1203, Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1506; amended Pub. L. 108–36, title IV, §414, June 25, 2003, 117 Stat. 830, related to transitional housing assistance.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

THOMAS EUGENE WALTEMYER, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 282 MAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 17th day of August, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

Pursuant to the requirements set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Patrick Henry, President and Chief Executive Officer of Entropic Communications, Inc.
(the Company), and David Lyle, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2009, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned
have set their hands hereto as of May 5, 2009.



|                                      |  |  |  |                              
|------------------------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|/s/ Patrick Henry                     |  |  |  | /s/ David Lyle               
|Patrick Henry                         |  |  |  | David Lyle                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal Executive Officer)         |  |  |  | (Principal Financial Officer)



|* | This certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company made under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, except to the extent that the Company specifically
incorporates this certification by reference therein.
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
### SUBCHAPTER V—HEALTH PROFESSIONS EDUCATION

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Health Workforce Coordination

Pub. L. 116–136, div. A, title III, §3402, Mar. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 387, provided that:

"(a) Strategic Plan.—

"(1) In general.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act [Mar. 27, 2020], the Secretary of Health and Human Services (referred to in this Act [probably means S. 2997 of the 116th Congress, a related bill which was not enacted into law] as the 'Secretary'), in consultation with the Advisory Committee on Training in Primary Care Medicine and Dentistry and the Advisory Council on Graduate Medical Education, shall develop a comprehensive and coordinated plan with respect to the health care workforce development programs of the Department of Health and Human Services, including education and training programs.

"(2) Requirements.—The plan under paragraph (1) shall—

"(A) include performance measures to determine the extent to which the programs described in paragraph (1) are strengthening the Nation's health care system;

"(B) identify any gaps that exist between the outcomes of programs described in paragraph (1) and projected health care workforce needs identified in workforce projection reports conducted by the Health Resources and Services Administration;

"(C) identify actions to address the gaps described in subparagraph (B); and

"(D) identify barriers, if any, to implementing the actions identified under subparagraph (C).

"(b) Coordination With Other Agencies.—The Secretary shall coordinate with the heads of other Federal agencies and departments that fund or administer health care workforce development programs, including education and training programs, to—

"(1) evaluate the performance of such programs, including the extent to which such programs are efficient and effective and are meeting the nation's [sic] health workforce needs; and

"(2) identify opportunities to improve the quality and consistency of the information collected to evaluate within and across such programs, and to implement such improvements.

"(c) Report.—Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act [Mar. 27, 2020], the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate, and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives, a report describing the plan developed under subsection (a) and actions taken to implement such plan."
### SUBCHAPTER VI—HOUSING FOR DISTRESSED FAMILIES OF SERVICEMEN AND VETERANS
### §11362. Discharge coordination policy

The Secretary may not provide a grant under this subchapter for any governmental entity serving as an applicant unless the applicant agrees to develop and implement, to the maximum extent practicable and where appropriate, policies and protocols for the discharge of persons from publicly funded institutions or systems of care (such as health care facilities, foster care or other youth facilities, or correction programs and institutions) in order to prevent such discharge from immediately resulting in homelessness for such persons.

(Pub. L. 100–77, title IV, §406, formerly §402, as added Pub. L. 106–377, §1(a)(1) [title II, §229(a)], Oct. 27, 2000, 114 Stat. 1441, 1441A–30; renumbered §406, Pub. L. 111–22, div. B, title I, §1101(2), May 20, 2009, 123 Stat. 1669.)
No: 15-049 August 12, 2015

CONTACT: Eliot Brenner, 301-415-8200

Victor M. McCree Selected as NRC’s Next Executive Director for Operations

Victor M. McCree, the Regional Administrator in the NRC’s Atlanta-based office, has been 

selected by the Commission as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s next Executive Director for 

Operations. This is the highest-ranking career position in the agency and one responsible for overseeing 

the agency’s regulatory programs. 

He succeeds Mark A. Satorius, who will retire Dec. 30 after serving with the agency since 1989. 

McCree is expected to assume his new responsibilities Sept. 27, 2015. 

“Victor McCree is the right choice to help the agency as it addresses the challenges of a 

changing regulatory environment and the need to more effectively apply limited resources while still 

ensuring the health and safety of the public,” said NRC Chairman Stephen Burns. “His leadership 

experience in heading the NRC’s largest regional office (Region II) will be a tremendous asset.” 

McCree joined the NRC in 1988 as an inspector in the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 

and held progressively more responsible jobs in that office and later in the office of then-NRC 

Chairman Shirley Ann Jackson.

“The agency is in the midst of change, and I am looking forward to helping ensure that our 

central mission of protecting people and the environment is maintained during this transformation,” 

said McCree. “Over the years, I have had the privilege of working closely with our excellent staff in 

both headquarters and the regions, and I am looking forward to building on those relationships as we 

move forward.” 

Assigned to Region II in Atlanta in 1989, McCree served as the deputy director and director for 

both the divisions of Reactor Safety and Reactor Projects. He became the deputy regional administrator 

for operations in 2006, and was appointed to lead the region in 2010. The Region II office has a staff of 

more than 300 and is responsible for regulating 32 reactors in seven southeastern states as well as all 

fuel cycle facilities in the country. The region also oversees implementation of the construction 

inspection program at all new nuclear power plants and fuel facilities nationwide. 

McCree, a native of Jackson, Miss., graduated from the Naval Academy in 1981 and holds an 

Executive Master of Business Administration degree from Georgia State University. Before joining the 

NRC he was a nuclear qualified submarine officer in the Navy. He received the Presidential 

Meritorious Rank Award in 2007.
§ 1307.2 Definitions. The definitions of the Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA) (15 U.S.C. 2052(a)) and the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (CPSIA) (Pub. L. 110-314, sec. 108(g)) apply to this part. Specifically, as defined in the CPSIA: ( a ) *Children's toy* means a consumer product designed or intended by the manufacturer for a child 12 years of age or younger for use by the child when the child plays.
( b ) *Child care article* means a consumer product designed or intended by the manufacturer to facilitate sleep or the feeding of children age 3 and younger, or to help such children with sucking or teething.
#### § 300.25a Country of origin in mail order advertising.

When a wool product is advertised in any mail order catalog or mail order promotional material, the description of such product shall contain a clear and conspicuous statement that the product was either made in U.S.A., imported, or both. Other words or phrases with the same meaning may be used. The statement of origin required by this section shall not be inconsistent with the origin labeling of the product being advertised.

[50 FR 15106, Apr. 17, 1985. Redesignated at 63 FR 7517, Feb. 13, 1998]
| **Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity - (Parenthetical) - $ / shares** | 3 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|----------------|
||
| **Statement of Stockholders' Equity [Abstract]**                                   |           |           |   |   |
| Dividends declared per share (usd per share)                                       | $ 0.42         | $ 0.40         | $ 2.04 | $ 2.80 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Aggregate dividends declared during the period for each share of common stock outstanding.
+ References
Reference 1: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Topic 505 -SubTopic 10 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section S99 -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph (SX 210.3-04) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org//1943274/2147480008/505-10-S99-1
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_CommonStockDividendsPerShareDeclared**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**dtr-types:perShareItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_StatementOfStockholdersEquityAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
### TO: Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

**FROM:** Ryan Novak , ERG **DATE:** September 30 , 2015 **SUBJECT: Index for Supporting Documentation for the**  **Lake Sinclair, GA Case Study** 

**Model (DCN**  **SE0559 4**  **)** This document serves as the index for the supporting documentation for the Lak e Sinclair, GA Case Study

Model, developed as part of the Environmental Assessment for the Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category (EA Report), Document No. EPA - 821 - R - 15 - 006 (DCN SE04527) . The supporting documentation for this case stud y includes the files listed in Table 1. **Table 1. Supporting Documentation for the Lake Sinclair, GA**  **Case Study Model Attachm** **ent ID**  **Document Name Brief Description** 
A1 Attachment 1: Pollutant

Loadings and Design Workbook - SE0559 5 A1 Documentation of the modeling scope, design, steam electric pow er plant loadings, STORET monitoring data, and DMR/TRI point source loadings evaluated for the Lake Sinclair, GA case study model. Refer to the ‘ReadMe’ tab of the w orkbook for additional infor mation about the contents of each tab.

A2 Attachment 2: WASP

Model Input and Output Files - SE0559 5 A2 These files represent the WA SP model input and output file s for the Lake Sinclair, GA case study model. The WASP input file (.w if) for each pollutant and scenario represents the settings and inputs used to execute case study modeling. The EFDC hydrodynamic data represents the flow data used for the Lake Sinclair, GA WASP model. The output data represent the daily water column concentrations in each segment of the WASP model, for each pollutant, for baseline and each regulatory option. A3 Attachment 3 : Water

Quality Benchmark Exceedance Analysis - SE0559 5 A 3 T he water quality analysis for the Lake Sinclair, GA case study mo del. These results were generated by running a script on the raw WASP model output (see Attachment 2) . The output from this script indicates the percent of daily average concentrations that each segment exceeded the water quality benchmarks evaluated in the EA. A4 Attachment 4 : Wildlife

and Human Health Im pacts Analysis - SE0559 5 A4 T he wildlife and human health analysis for the Lake Sinclair, GA case study model. This workbook includes the all - segment average water column concentration output, generated by the WASP model , that were evaluated against the threshold concentrations determined to trigger wildlife or human health benchmark exceedances.
Schedule to Change in Control Agreements



 Exhibit 10.1(a) 
 Schedule to Change in Control Agreement 
 Horace Mann Educators Corporation (“HMEC”) and Horace Mann Service
Corporation (“HMSC”) entered into Change in Control Agreements with the following persons on the dates shown. These agreements are identical to the one included as Exhibit 10.13 to HMEC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and are the same type of agreement as the one included as Exhibit 10.7 to HMEC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, except that (1) the multiple of the annual base salary and
average of annual cash bonus paid to the employee in the last three years and (2) the specified period during which such employee’s insurance benefits would continue are equal to the duration below. 
  

					
	 Employee
	  	Duration	    	Agreement Date
	 Frank D’Ambra
	  	1.5 years	    	03-08-2005
No: 13-081 September 17, 2013

CONTACT: Ivonne Couret, 301-415-8200 

NRC Issues New Edition of Information Digest

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued its 2013-2014 edition of the Information

Digest. The Digest, available in three formats, provides a compilation of NRC-related and nuclearrelated data, intended to serve as a quick reference to major facts about the agency and the industry it 

regulates, in an easy-to-use format.

This edition, NUREG-1350, Volume 25, incorporates infographics to help provide a visual 

representation of information and statistics. The Digest provides the NRC Facts at a Glance, a handy 

tear-out reference sheet that has quick facts and short answers to commonly asked questions. All the 

NRC graphics and data sets are also available online.

Available online, the electronic version of the Digest has embedded hyperlinks for navigation 

convenience and easy access to more information on major topics discussed. In addition, a single print 

or CD copy is available upon written request to U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of 

Administration Publications Branch Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 via email to 

distribution.resource@nrc.gov or fax: 301-415-2289.