alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3462 

To require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to make tuition payments for 

veterans enrolled in institutions of higher learning who are receiving 

assistance under the Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program by not 

later than the tuition due date for the quarter, semester, or term. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2011 

Mr. CLARKE of Michigan (for himself, Mr. BENISHEK, Mr. HUIZENGA of 

Michigan, and Mr. WALBERG) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to make tuition 

payments for veterans enrolled in institutions of higher 

learning who are receiving assistance under the Post9/11 Educational Assistance Program by not later than 

the tuition due date for the quarter, semester, or term. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 3462 IH

1 SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT THAT THE SECRETARY OF VET2 ERANS AFFAIRS MAKE TUITION PAYMENTS 

3 FOR VETERANS ENROLLED IN INSTITUTIONS 

4 OF HIGHER LEARNING WHO ARE RECEIVING 

5 ASSISTANCE UNDER THE POST-9/11 EDU6 CATIONAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM BY NOT 

7 LATER THAN THE TUITION DUE DATE FOR 

8 THE QUARTER, SEMESTER, OR TERM. 

9 (a) PAYMENT OF TUITION BY FIRST DAY OF QUAR10 TER, SEMESTER, OR TERM.—Section 3313(d)(1) of title 

11 38, United States Code, is amended— 

12 (1) by inserting before the period at the end the 

13 following: ‘‘, and shall be paid not later than the 

14 date on which the tuition payment is due, as estab15 lished by the institution of higher learning’’; and 

16 (2) by adding at the end the following new sen17 tence: ‘‘In determining the amount of a payment de18 scribed in this paragraph, the Secretary shall take 

19 into consideration any waiver of, or reduction in, tui20 tion and fees and any scholarship or other Federal, 

21 State, institutional, or employer-based aid or assist22 ance that is made or awarded as of the date on 

23 which the tuition payment is due. In the event that 

24 any such waiver, reduction, scholarship, aid, or as25 sistance is made or awarded after such date, the in26 stitution of higher learning shall repay to the Secmstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 3462 IH

1 retary an amount equal to the amount of such waiv2 er, reduction, scholarship, aid, or assistance.’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to payments of edu5 cational assistance made for a quarter, semester, or term 

6 that begins after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7839
JAMES M. CONNELL, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WILLIAM DAVIS, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-3326-0-21BD) Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: September 30, 1996 Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James M. Connell, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the grant of summary judgment to the Respondents on all but one claim of Appellant's habeas corpus petition. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal; to the extent that a certificate of appealability is required, we deny it. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 1.101 OMB control numbers assigned pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act.

(a) *Purpose.* This part collects and displays control numbers assigned by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 to information collection requirements in rules issued or enforced by the Commission. A response to an information collection is not required unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. This part fulfills the mandate (44 U.S.C. 3507(a)(3), 44 U.S.C. 3512) that agencies display the current control number assigned by the OMB Director to agency information collection requirements and inform affected persons that they need not respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid control number.

(b) *Display.*

| Current OMB control number (all numbers begin with 3084-) | 16 CFR part where the information collection requirement is located (or alternate part(s) if issued by another agency, co-enforced by the Federal Trade Commission) |
| --- | --- |
| 0005 | 801-803. |
| 0025 | 453. |
| 0068 | 306. |
| 0069 | 305. |
| 0085 | 12 CFR part 205; 12 CFR part 1005. |
| 0086 | 12 CFR part 213; 12 CFR part 1013. |
| 0087 | 12 CFR part 202; 12 CFR part 1002. |
| 0088 | 12 CFR part 226; 12 CFR part 1026. |
| 0094 | 309. |
| 0097 | 310. |
| 0099 | 301. |
| 0100 | 300. |
| 0101 | 303. |
| 0102 | 308. |
| 0103 | 423. |
| 0104 | 425. |
| 0105 | 432. |
| 0106 | 435. |
| 0107 | 436. |
| 0108 | 455. |
| 0109 | 460. |
| 0110 | 500-503. |
| 0111 | 701. |
| 0112 | 702. |
| 0113 | 703. |
| 0117 | 312. |
| 0121 | 313. |
| 0127 | 315. |
| 0128 | 12 CFR 1022.136; 12 CFR 1022.137. |
| 0131 | 680; 12 CFR 1022.20. |
| 0132 | 642; 12 CFR 1022.54. |
| 0137 | 641; 681. |
| 0142 | 437. |
| 0144 | 660; 12 CFR 1022.42; 12 CFR 1022.43. |
| 0145 | 640; 12 CFR 1022.70. |
| 0150 | 318. |
| 0156 | 12 CFR part 1014. |
| 0157 | 12 CFR part 1015. |

[78 FR 65558, Nov. 1, 2013]
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-14-0121-Annual update of the Risk-Informed Activities Public Web Site

Accession Number: ML14283A497

Date Released: Monday, November 17, 2014

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML14283A515 - SECY-14-0121:  Annual Update of the Risk-Informed Activities Public Web Site (5 page(s), 10/31/2014)
    - ML14283A524 - SECY-14-0121:  Enclosure 1-Risk-Informed Activities Summary and 2014 Update (12 page(s), 10/31/2014)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
Exhibit
10.2


Change of Control
Agreement


The Change of
Control Agreement dated July 10 between Apex Silver Mines Limited and Deborah.
Friedman, Senior Vice President and General Counsel of the Company, is in the
form of the Change of Control Agreement previously filed with the Company’s Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 which is incorporated by
reference hereto.  The salary and bonus
multiple for the purpose of Section 4(iii)(B) of Ms. Friedman’s agreement is
two.  The benefit period for the purpose
of Sections 4(iv) and (v) of Ms. Friedman’s agreement is twenty-four months.
### SUBCHAPTER I—ACID PRECIPITATION
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 2283

_____________________________
L YNNE F REMONT , Appellant,

v.

B RANDSMART USA and T RAVELERS I NSURANCE C O

. , Appellee s

.

_____________________________

On appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims

. Geraldine B. Hogan
, Judge

. June 4, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W ETHERELL , R AY , and W INSOR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Kimberly A. Hill for Appellant.

Scott H. Silver and Steven H. Preston for Appellee s

.
§ 1234.2 Requirements for infant bath tubs. Each infant bath tub must comply with all applicable provisions of ASTM F2670-22, *Standard Consumer Safety Specification for Infant Bath Tubs,* approved on March 1, 2022. The Director of the Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. A read-only copy of the standard is available for viewing on the ASTM website at *https://www.astm.org/READINGLIBRARY/ .* You may obtain a copy from ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959; telephone (610) 832-9585; *www.astm.org .* You may inspect a copy at the Division of the Secretariat, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Room 820, 4330 East-West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, telephone (301) 504-7479, email *cpsc-os@cpsc.gov ,* or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, email *fr.inspection@nara.gov ,* or go to: *www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html .* [87 FR 37732, June 24, 2022]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 23, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 68146]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25896]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than December 7, 2004.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Sue Costello, Vice President) 
1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30303:
    1. The Cecil and Olivia Batchelor Family Limited Partnership, J. 
Gregory Batchelor general partner; and The Olivia and Cecil Batchelor 
Family Limited Partnership, Rebecca Batchelor Reeves general partner; 
along with Cecil Batchelor, Oliva Batchelor, J. Gregory Batchelor, 
Rebecca Batchelor Reeves, Ray Bradley Reeves, Donna Batchelor, and 
Dependable True Value, Inc., all of Russellville, Alabama; to 
collectively acquire voting shares of CBS Banc-Corp, Russellville, 
Alabama, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Citizens Bank 
& Savings Company, Russellville, Alabama, and Bank of Bolivar, Bolivar, 
Tennessee.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 17, 
2004.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 04-25896 Filed 11-22-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3519 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3519

  To amend to exempt the Medicare program from fallback sequestration 
                 under the Budget Control Act of 2011.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 29, 2011

 Mr. Towns (for himself, Mrs. Christensen, Ms. Lee of California, Mr. 
Clay, Mr. Carson of Indiana, Ms. Hanabusa, and Mr. Hastings of Florida) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                               the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend to exempt the Medicare program from fallback sequestration 
                 under the Budget Control Act of 2011.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXEMPTING MEDICARE FROM FALLBACK SEQUESTRATION UNDER BUDGET 
              CONTROL ACT OF 2011.

    Section 251A of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control 
Act of 1985 (42 U.S.C. 901a), as added by section 302(a) of the Budget 
Control Act of 2011 (Public Law 112-25), is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (8), by striking ``except that the 
        percentage reduction for the Medicare programs specified in 
        section 256(d) shall not be more than 2 percent for a fiscal 
        year'' and inserting ``except that there shall be no reduction 
        for the Medicare programs specified in section 256(d)''; and
            (2) in paragraph (9), by striking ``the percentage 
        reduction for the Medicare programs would exceed 2 percent for 
        a fiscal year in the absence of paragraph (8)'' and inserting 
        ``there would be a percentage reduction for the Medicare 
        programs for a fiscal year in the absence of paragraph (8)''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1051.2 General. ( a ) Any person may file with the Commission a petition requesting the Commission to begin a proceeding to issue, amend or revoke a regulation under any of the statutes it administers.
( b ) A petition which addresses a risk of injury associated with a product which could be eliminated or reduced to a sufficient extent by action taken under the Federal Hazardous Substances Act, the Poison Prevention Packaging Act of 1970, or the Flammable Fabrics Act may be considered by the Commission under those Acts. However, if the Commission finds by rule, in accordance with section 30(d) of the CPSA, as amended by Public Law 94-284, that it is in the public interest to regulate such risk of injury under the CPSA, it may do so. Upon determination by the Office of the General Counsel that a petition should be considered under one of these acts rather than the CPSA, the Office of the Secretary shall docket and process the petition under the appropriate act and inform the petitioner of this determination. Such docketing, however, shall not preclude the Commission from proceeding to regulate the product under the CPSA after making the necessary findings.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders
                                                                              Ending
Class                   Interest             Principal      Losses           Balance
<S>                     <C>                  <C>            <C>              <C>
A1                     5,539,393.35       4,273,424.71         0.00        109,560,605.29
A2                    22,154,866.64               0.00         0.00        439,000,000.00
B                      1,146,863.80               0.00         0.00         22,408,000.00
C                      1,342,193.13               0.00         0.00         25,854,000.00
D                        453,195.62               0.00         0.00          8,619,000.00
E                        908,584.21               0.00         0.00         17,236,000.00
F                        363,465.30               0.00         0.00          6,895,000.00
G                         90,879.50               0.00         0.00          1,724,000.00
H                        597,523.36               0.00         0.00         13,789,000.00
J                        298,783.36               0.00         0.00          6,895,000.00
K                        224,076.64               0.00         0.00          5,171,000.00
L                        597,553.68               0.00         0.00         13,789,000.00
M                              0.00               0.00         0.00         13,789,701.00
R1                             0.00               0.00         0.00                  0.00
R2                             0.00               0.00         0.00                  0.00
R3                             0.00               0.00         0.00                  0.00
R4                             0.04               0.00         0.00                  0.00
X                      1,910,305.08               0.00         0.00                  0.00

</TABLE>
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-15-0002:  Proposed Updates of Licensing Policies Rules, and Guidance for Future New Reactor Applications.

Accession Number: ML13277A420

Date Released: Monday, January 26, 2015

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML13281A382 - SECY-15-0002:  Updating New Reactor Licensing Policies, Rules, and Guidance (10 page(s), 1/8/2015)
    - ML13277A647 - SECY-15-0002:  Enclosure 1 - Improving Alignment Between New Reactor Licensing Processes (16 page(s), 1/8/2015)
    - ML13277A652 - SECY-15-0002:  Enclosure 2 - 10 CFR Part 52 New Reactor Licensing Lessons Learned Rulemaking (2 page(s), 1/8/2015)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
§ 444.4 Late charges. ( a ) In connection with collecting a debt arising out of an extension of credit to a consumer in or affecting commerce, as commerce is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, it is an unfair act or practice within the meaning of section 5 of that Act for a creditor, directly or indirectly, to levy or collect any deliquency charge on a payment, which payment is otherwise a full payment for the applicable period and is paid on its due date or within an applicable grace period, when the only delinquency is attributable to late fee(s) or delinquency charge(s) assessed on earlier installment(s).
( b ) For purposes of this section, *collecting a debt* means any activity other than the use of judicial process that is intended to bring about or does bring about repayment of all or part of a consumer debt.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Medina  International  Corp.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  September  30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Bradley Colby, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/S/ BRADLEY COLBY
-----------------------
Bradley Colby
Chief Executive Officer




<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Medina  International  Corp.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  September  30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Nick DeMare, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/S/ NICK DEMARE
-----------------------
Nick DeMare
Chief Financial Officer




<PAGE>
### §13334. Nonfuel use of coal

#### (a) Program

The Secretary shall prepare a plan for and carry out a program of research, development, demonstration, and commercial application with respect to technologies for the nonfuel use of coal, including—

(1) production of coke and other carbon products derived from coal;

(2) production of coal-derived, carbon-based chemical intermediates that are precursors of value-added chemicals and polymers;

(3) production of chemicals from coal-derived synthesis gas;

(4) coal treatment processes, including methodologies such as solvent-extraction techniques that produce low ash, low sulfur, coal-based chemical feedstocks; and

(5) waste utilization, including recovery, processing, and marketing of products derived from sulfur, carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and ash from coal.

#### (b) Plan contents

The plan described in subsection (a) shall address and evaluate—

(1) the known and potential processes for using coal in the creation of products in the chemical, utility, fuel, and carbon-based materials industries;

(2) the costs, benefits, and economic feasibility of using coal products in the chemical and materials industries, including value-added chemicals, carbon-based products, coke, and waste derived from coal;

(3) the economics of coproduction of products from coal in conjunction with the production of electric power, thermal energy, and fuel;

(4) the economics of the refining of coal and coal byproducts to produce nonfuel products;

(5) the economics of coal utilization in comparison with other feedstocks that might be used for the same purposes;

(6) the steps that can be taken by the public and private sectors to bring about commercialization of technologies developed under the program recommended; and

(7) the past development, current status, and future potential of coal products and processes associated with nonfuel uses of coal.

(Pub. L. 102–486, title XIII, §1304, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2973.)
## NO. 12-08-00041-CV IN THE COUR T OF APP EALS TWELFTH COURT OF APP EALS D ISTRICT

TYLER, TEX AS

§ APP EAL FRO

M T HE IN THE INTERE

ST OF T.W.T., § COUNTY COURT A T LAW OF A MINOR CH

ILD § CHER OK EE CO UN

TY, T EXAS MEMORA NDUM OPIN ION PER CU RIAM This appea l is being di s missed for wa nt of prosec ution. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 42.3(b). Appellants per fec ted her

appea l on J anuar

y 22, 2008. There afte r, the repor ter’s r ecor d was filed on Marc h 26, 2008, making Appellant’s br ief due on or bef ore A pril 25, 2008. When Appellant failed to file her br ief within the re quired time, this court notified her on April 30, 2008 that the brief was past due a nd war ned that if no motion for ex tension of time to file the brief was re ceive d by

May 12, 20 08 , th e a

pp e a l w ou ld be dismis se d f or wa nt o f p ro se c uti on

un de r T e xas R

ule of Ap pe llate Pr oc e dure 42 .3 (b ). Th e no tic e fu rt he r i nf or me d App e lla

nt t hat the mot ion

fo r e xten sio n o f t ime mus t contain a r easona

ble explanation f

or her f ailure to file the brief a

nd a showingthat Appellee had not s u f f e r e d m a t e r i a l i n

j ur y th e r e b y. To date, A

ppellant has neither compli ed with or otherwise re sponded to this court’s April 30, 2008 notice. Ac cording ly , we dis miss the a pp e a l for want of prosecution

. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8(a) (1), 42.3.( b). Opinion delivere d May

14, 2008. P an elconsi s t ed of

W ort hen, C. J. , G r i

f f i t h, J. , and H oyl e, J.

(PUBL I SH)