alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7436

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BERNARD DIXON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (CR-92-464-A, CA-97-839-AM)

Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 4, 1998

Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bernard Dixon, Appellant Pro Se. William Neil Hammerstrom, Jr.,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Bernard Dixon seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Dixon, Nos. CR-92-464-A; CA-97-839-AM

(E.D. Va. Sept. 10, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

Pursuant to the requirements set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Patrick Henry, President and Chief Executive Officer of Entropic
Communications, Inc. (the Registrant), and David Lyle, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009, to which this Certification is attached as
Exhibit 32 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of August 3, 2009.



|                                      |  |  |  |                              
|------------------------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|                                      |  | 
|/s/ Patrick Henry                     |  |  |  | /s/ David Lyle               
|Patrick Henry                         |  |  |  | David Lyle                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal Executive Officer)         |  |  |  | (Principal Financial Officer)



|* | This Certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Registrant made under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date of this Report, except to the extent that the Registrant specifically incorporates this
Certification by reference therein.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
§ 1112.53 Can the CPSC immediately withdraw its acceptance of the accreditation of a third party conformity assessment body? ( a ) When it is in the public interest to protect health and safety, and notwithstanding any other provision of this part, the CPSC may withdraw immediately and temporarily its acceptance of a third party conformity assessment body's accreditation for any portion of its CPSC scope while the CPSC pursues an investigation and potential adverse action under § 1112.51. ( 1 ) For purposes of this part, “in the public interest to protect health and safety” means that the CPSC has credible evidence that: ( i ) The integrity of test(s) being conducted under a scope for which the CPSC has accepted the third party conformity assessment body's accreditation, have been affected by undue influence or otherwise interfered with or compromised; and
( ii ) The scope for which the CPSC has accepted the third party conformity assessment body's accreditation involve a product(s) which, if noncompliant with CPSC rules, bans, standards, and/or regulations, constitutes an imminently hazardous consumer product under section 12 of the CPSA.
( 2 ) When presented with an allegation that, if credible, would result in immediate and temporary withdrawal of CPSC acceptance of a third party conformity assessment body's accreditation, the investigation and adverse action procedures described in § 1112.51 apply, except that instead of the timeframes described in § 1112.51, the following timeframes will apply when the CPSC pursues immediate and temporary withdrawal: ( i ) The Initial Notice will generally inform the third party conformity assessment body that it has 7 calendar days to respond.
( ii ) An administrative appeal of a Final Notice of immediate and temporary withdrawal will be timely if filed within 7 calendar days of the date of the Final Notice.
( b ) If the third party conformity assessment body is already the subject of an investigation or adverse action process under § 1112.51, the immediate and temporary withdrawal will remain in effect until: the agency communicates in writing that the immediate and temporary withdrawal has been lifted; the investigation concludes and the agency does not propose an adverse action; or the adverse action process concludes with denial, suspension, or withdrawal.
( c ) If the third party conformity assessment body is not already the subject of an investigation or adverse action process under § 1112.51, an investigation under § 1112.51(a) will be launched based on the same information that justified the immediate and temporary withdrawal.
EXHIBIT 32

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB/A of Healthbridge, Inc. (Registrant) for the annual period
ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (Report), I, Nora Coccaro, chief executive officer and chief financial
officer, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)    
          This Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in this
          Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of
          Registrant at
the end of the period covered by this Report and results of operations of Registrant for
the period covered by this Report.

| | 
| | 

/s/ Nora Coccaro

Nora Coccaro

Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer October 3, 2005

This certification accompanies this
Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to
the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for
the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This
certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made
before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written
statement required by §906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained
by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
#### Gloria Allen et al., Appellants-Respondents, v General Electric Company et al., Respondents-Appellants.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[820 NYS2d 912]

Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Kenneth R. Fisher, J.), entered June 17, 2005. The order, inter alia, granted in part defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the claims for medical monitoring expenses.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed and the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in *Allen v General Elec. Co.*(32 AD3d 1163 [2006]). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Scudder, Kehoe, Smith and Green, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 30, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69619-69620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26420]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CO-200-0777-XZ-241A]


Notice of Meeting, Front Range Resource Advisory Council 
(Colorado)

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
(FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. 
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Front Range 
Resource Advisory Council (RAC), will meet as indicated below.

DATES: The meeting will be held January 5, 2005 from 9:15 a.m. to 4 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: Holy Cross Abbey Community Center, 2951 E. Highway 50, Canon 
City, Colorado 81212.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ken Smith, (719) 269-8500.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 15 member Council advises the Secretary 
of the Interior, through the Bureau of Land Management, on a variety of 
planning and management issues associated with public land management 
in the Royal Gorge Field Office and San Luis Valley, Colorado. Planned 
agenda topics include: Manager updates on current land management 
issues; a presentation and discussion on Tamarisk control and local BLM 
weed control efforts and a briefing on power transmission and supply 
across public land. All meetings are open to the

[[Page 69620]]

public. The public is encouraged to make oral comments to the Council 
at 9:30 a.m. or written statements may be submitted for the Councils 
consideration. Depending on the number of persons wishing to comment 
and time available, the time for individual oral comments may be 
limited. Summary minutes for the Council Meeting will be maintained in 
the Royal Gorge Field Office and will be available for public 
inspection and reproduction during regular business hours within thirty 
(30) days following the meeting. Meeting Minutes are also available at: 
http://www.blm.gov/rac/co/frrac/co_fr.htm htm.

    Dated: November 18, 2004.
Linda McGlothlen,
Acting Royal Gorge Field Manager.
[FR Doc. 04-26420 Filed 11-29-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 349 

To make subject to appropriations Acts the Internal Revenue Service’s use 

of certain funds collected from user fees. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 19, 2011 

Mr. SENSENBRENNER (for himself, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. DUNCAN of South 

Carolina, Mr. ROSS of Florida, Mr. CRAWFORD, Mr. LONG, and Mr. 

DUNCAN of Tennessee) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To make subject to appropriations Acts the Internal Revenue 

Service’s use of certain funds collected from user fees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘IRS Fee Reform Act 

5 of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE USER FEES SUBJECT 

7 TO APPROPRIATIONS ACTS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The second sentence of section 3 

9 of title I of Public Law 103–329, under the heading ‘‘ADVerDate Mar 15 2010 03:58 Jan 20, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H349.IH H349

pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 349 IH

1 MINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS-INTERNAL REVENUE SERV2 ICE’’, is amended by striking ‘‘The Secretary of the Treas3 ury may spend’’ and all that follows through ‘‘and there4 after’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘Any fees collected pur5 suant to this section shall be deposited in the general fund 

6 of the Treasury and shall not be expended by the Internal 

7 Revenue Service unless provided by an appropriations 

8 Act’’. 

9 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The last proviso of 

10 such section is amended by striking ‘‘and how they are 

11 being expended by the Service’’. 

12 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

13 this section shall apply to fees collected after the date of 

14 the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 23, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 68209]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25880]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORATION

Federal Aviation Administration


High Density Airports; Notice of Reagan National Airport Lottery 
Allocation Procedures

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of lottery and allocation procedures for slots at 
Washington Reagan National Airport; extension of submission deadline.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On November 17, 2004, the FAA announced that a lottery will be 
held on December 3, 2004, to allocate six available commuter slots at 
Washington's Reagan National Airport (DCA). (69 FR 67382; November 17, 
2004). The closing date for carriers to submit requests to participate 
in the lottery is November 18, 2004. The FAA is extending that date for 
submissions to November 29, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lorelei Peter, Operations and Air 
Traffic Law Branch, Regulations Division, Office of the Chief Counsel, 
Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., 
Washington, DC 20591; telephone number (202) 267-3134.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On November 10, 2004, the FAA issued a notice announcing a lottery 
to allocate six commuter slots at DCA (69 FR 67382; November 17, 2004). 
According to the provisions of the notice, carriers seeking to 
participate in the lottery must notify the FAA in writing no later than 
5 p.m. e.d.t. on November 18, 2004. The FAA is extending this 
submission deadline to 5 p.m. e.s.t on November 29, 2004. This 
extension will allow adequate time for carriers to respond to the 
lottery notice in view of the original publication date and the 
Thanksgiving holiday.

    Issued on November 17, 2004 in Washington, DC.
James Whitlow,
Deputy Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. 04-25880 Filed 11-17-04; 2:52 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
#### Ella M. Marks, Appellant, v. Bloomingdale Bros., Inc., Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *post,*p. 938.]
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Inergy Holdings, L.P. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John J. Sherman, Chief Executive Officer of Inergy Holdings, L.P., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ John J. ShermanJohn J. Sherman Chief Executive
OfficerMay 10, 2007


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating,

acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written

statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished

to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



41
EXHIBIT 32.2  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) by Speedhaul Holdings, Inc. (the Registrant), I, Adam Wasserman, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:  1.
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
  2.
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of Registrant.
  /s/ Adam Wasserman Name: Adam Wasserman Title: Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer  Dated: October 15, 2007  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No: IV-14-023 September 23, 2014

CONTACT: Victor Dricks 817-200-1128

 Lara Uselding 817-200-1519

NRC to Meet with Officials to Discuss Wolf Creek Nuclear Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corp. 

(WCNOC) officials on Oct. 2 to discuss long-standing design issues with the cooling water system at 

the Wolf Creek nuclear plant, located north of Burlington, Kan. 

The public meeting will be held from 2-3 p.m. at NRC’s Region IV Offices, 1600 E. Lamar 

Blvd., Arlington, Texas. The public will be invited to ask questions following the discussion between 

NRC staff and the licensee. Interested parties can participate via phone by dialing 877-918-3007 and 

entering passcode 24521.

The cooling water system draws water from Coffey County Lake, pumps it to plant systems for 

cooling purposes and then returns it to the lake. The service water does not come into contact with any 

radioactive steam or water during this process. There has been a long-standing issue with corrosion and 

pressure surges in system piping and NRC staff wants to hear the licensee’s plan to implement design 

modifications to eliminate the problems.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Foreign Agricultural Service

# AGENCY:

Foreign Agricultural Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice.

The Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS) today accepted petitions filed by the Louisiana Shrimp Association, P.O. Box 1088, Grand Isle, Louisiana 70358, for trade adjustment assistance. The association represents shrimpers in the state of Louisiana. The Administrator will determine within 40 days whether or not imports of shrimp and prawns contributed importantly to a decline in domestic producer prices of 20 percent or more during the marketing period beginning January 2003 and ending December 2003. If the determination is positive, all shrimpers who land and market their shrimp in Louisiana will be eligible to apply to the Farm Service Agency for technical assistance at no cost and for adjustment assistance payments.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Jean-Louis Pajot, Coordinator, Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers, FAS, USDA, (202) 720-2916, e-mail:                         *trade.adjustment@fas.usda.gov.*

Dated: November 4, 2004.

A. Ellen Terpstra,

Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service.

[FR Doc. 04-25602 Filed 11-17-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-10-P
#### In the Matter of Robert Saltzman et al., Copartners Doing Business as Grant Square Liquor Store, et al., Appellants, against John F. O’Connell et al., Constituting the State Liquor Authority, et al., Respondents.

Petitioners appeal from an order (1) denying their application to annul a determination of the State Liquor Authority which approved an application for the transfer of a retail liquor license and for removal of the licensed business to different premises; and restraining the respondents to whom the license was thus transferred from engaging in the sale of liquor and wine at said new premises, and (2) granting the motions of respondents to dismiss the petition. Order reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellants, and respondents’ motions denied, without costs, and with leave to respondents to serve and file answers to the petition within ten days after the entry of an order hereon. The application for approval of the transfer and removal was *733originally denied by the Authority on February 28, 1952, after a hearing at which the appellants Saltzman Were permitted to file written protests. These appellants are licensed operators of a retail liquor store located not far from the premises to which removal was sought. Appellants Zinotofsky and Smith are owners of parcels of real property in the vicinity, and are taxpayers. After the said original disapproval the Authority entertained an application for reconsideration, and thereupon, and on April 30, 1952, granted the application to approve the transfer and removal. The Authority, acting in quasi-judicial capacity, may not review its own determination, as an appellate body, and revise the determination. *(Matter of Newman Lake House, Inc.,*V. *Bruekman,*258 App. Div. 765; *Matter of Crean*v. *Bruekman,*178 Mise 231; of. *Herpe*v. *Herpe,*225 N. Y. 323, and *Matter of Cupo*v. *McGoldrick,*278 App. Div. 108.) It may not be said, on the basis of the petition alone, that appellants do not have standing, as aggrieved parties, to attack the determination in question by way of a proceeding such as this. (Cf. *Matter of Scudder*v. *O’Connell,*272 App. Div. 251, 254, and *Commission*v. *Sanders Radio Station,*309 U. S. 470.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Wenzel and Beldock, JJ., concur. [See *post,*p. 764.]