alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2315

To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to certain prohibitions 

relating to police badges, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 3, 2003

Mr. WEINER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to 

certain prohibitions relating to police badges, and for 

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Badge Security En5 hancement Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. POLICE BADGES. 

7 Section 716 of title 18, United States Code, is 

8 amended—

9 (1) in subsection (b)—
2

•HR 2315 IH 

1 (A) by striking paragraphs (2) and (4); 

2 and 

3 (B) by redesignating paragraph (3) as 

4 paragraph (2); and 

5 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(d)(1) Whoever receives, in interstate or foreign 

7 commerce, a genuine or counterfeit police badge shall pro8 vide a certification of the intended use of that badge to 

9 the person or entity from which the badge is received. 

10 ‘‘(2) Whoever knowingly transfers or transports in 

11 interstate or foreign commerce, a genuine or counterfeit 

12 police badge shall obtain written permission from the 

13 agency represented on the badge before doing so. 

14 ‘‘(3) The Attorney General shall, by rule made on the 

15 record, establish additional procedures for the transfer or 

16 transportation of genuine and counterfeit police badges in 

17 interstate or foreign commerce to assure that a genuine 

18 or counterfeit police badge is not acquired under false pre19 tenses that the badge will be used or is intended to be 

20 used for a purpose described in subsection (b) but then 

21 diverted to illegal purposes. 

22 ‘‘(4) Whoever knowingly engages in conduct that vio23 lates paragraph (1) or (2), or a rule made under para24 graph (3), shall be fined under this title or imprisoned 

25 not more than 6 months, or both. 
3

•HR 2315 IH 

1 ‘‘(5) This section shall not apply to the use of a gen2 uine or counterfeit badge in the fictitious or historical vis3 ual depiction of either a public officer or employee.’’.

Æ
#### § 1112.19 How does the CPSC publish information identifying third party conformity assessment bodies that have been accepted?

The CPSC will maintain on its Web site an up-to-date listing of third party conformity assessment bodies whose accreditations it has accepted and the scope of each acceptance. The CPSC will update the listing regularly to account for changes, such as the addition of new CPSC rules and/or test methods to its scope of accreditation, changes to accreditation certificates, new addresses, as well as changes to the status of a third party conformity assessment body due to voluntary discontinuance, suspension, and/or withdrawal. The CPSC will also list the firewalled or governmental status of accepted laboratories on the CPSC Web site.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 06, 2024. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, May 06, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A24I0183. SEPID, LLC d/b/a GATA'S SPORTS BAR & GRILL v. DEVEN MERCHANT.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: STSV2021000237
Editorial Note on Part 400
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 400 appear at 78 FR 69289, Nov. 19, 2013.

§ 400.44 Zone schedule. ( a ) The zone grantee shall submit to the Executive Secretary (electronic copy or as specified by the Executive Secretary) a zone schedule which sets forth the elements required in this section. No element of a zone schedule (including any amendment to the zone schedule) may be considered to be in effect until such submission has occurred. If warranted, the Board may subsequently amend the requirements of this section by Board Order.
( b ) Each zone schedule shall include: ( 1 ) A title page, which shall include the name of the zone grantee and the date of the current schedule;
( 2 ) A table of contents;
( 3 ) Internal rules/regulations and policies for the zone;
( 4 ) All rates or charges assessed by or on behalf of the grantee;
( 5 ) Information identifying any operator which offers services to the public and which has requested that its information be included in the zone schedule; and
( 6 ) An appendix with definitions of any FTZ-related terms used in the zone schedule (as needed).
( c ) The Executive Secretary may review the zone schedule (or any amendment to the zone schedule) to determine whether it contains sufficient information for zone participants concerning the operation of the zone and the grantee's rates and charges as provided in paragraphs (b)(3) and (b)(4) of this section. If the Executive Secretary determines that the zone schedule (or amendment) does not satisfy these requirements, the Executive Secretary shall notify the zone grantee. The Executive Secretary may also conduct a review under 400.45(b).
( d ) Amendments to the zone schedule shall be prepared and submitted in the manner described in paragraph (a) of this section, and listed in the concluding section of the zone schedule, with dates. No rates/charges or other provisions required for the zone schedule may be applied by, or on behalf of, the grantee unless those specific rates/charges or provisions are included in the most recent zone schedule submitted to the Board and made available to the public in compliance with paragraph (e) of this section.
( e ) A complete copy of the zone schedule shall be freely available for public inspection at the offices of the zone grantee. The Board shall make copies of zone schedules available on its website.
[77 FR 12139, Feb. 28, 2012, as amended at 89 FR 8530, Feb. 8, 2024]
EXHIBIT
31.1





SIGNATURES




Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized





ONCOLIN
THERAPEUTICS, INC.




By:  /s/
J. Leonard Ivins


J.
Leonard Ivins, Chief Executive Officer


Date: May
14, 2010, 2010




Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the
capacities and on the dates indicated.




Signature
              Title
              Date/s/
      J. Leonard Ivins
              Chief
      Executive Officer and
              May
      14, 2010J.
      Leonard Ivins
              Chairman
      of the Board
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Merci, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009(the Report), I, Jose Acevedo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations. Date: February 24, 2010 /s/ Jose Acevedo Chief Financial Officer
CONTACT REPORT

Persons Calling: Keith Barnett and Steve Silverman

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

OAQPS/SPPD and OGC

919-541-5605

Person Called: Hector Ybanez

Holcim (US) Inc.

Date of Contact: October 22, 2010.

Contact Summary: 

Steve and I called Hector to discuss the issue he and others had raised about the weigh system 

calibration requirements in the Portland Cement NESHAP. Hector explained the clinker 

reconciliation procedures used at Holcim plants, and the method used to determine the amount of 

feed material. From this conversation it appeared to the EPA preventatives that this issue was 

mainly interpreting what was meant by calibration. We agreed to address this issue at a later 

date, but determined it was not necessary to address it in the NESHAP clarification notice we 

were currently preparing.

More information was provided by Hector Ybanez in a 9/17/2010 email that has been separately 

docketed
January 10, 2006


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 - Fifth Street - N.W.
Washington, DC  20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

This letter authorizes the following representatives of The Clorox Company,
acting singly, to execute and file with you on my behalf future Forms 3,
4 and 5 respecting my holdings of equity securities of The Clorox Company:

Laura Stein, Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary
Angela Hilt, Senior Corporate Counsel
Cheryl Brice, Assistant Secretary

Sincerely,


/s/ Michael E. Shannon
Name:  Michael E. Shannon
Title:  Director
# TASHVIENTERPRISE

MAHAVIR ESTATE,687 A MAKBA BLDG,2'° FLOOR, FLAT N0.24, BYCULLAMUMBAI·400027 INDIA, PHONE·23087298 To, FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

## 10 0E C 7014 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., WilburWrightBuilding- Suite 2Wl000, Washington, D.C. 20591. 

# R 

# D DE.'- It261¥ Ref:- Case No. 2014S0700395 

### HEARl

...**~,:<ET** Attention : Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430
MAY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOUR :- Please refer to your notice dated 25th November, 2014 received byme on 30th day ofNovember, 2014. As per the final notice itis brought to my notice that you have proposed to levy a heavy civil penalty of fine of $32,800 without giving me an opportunityto prove thatthe allegations placed byyou are incorrect, false andbaseless. In this respect, I therefore request for a hearing in the said matter to prove my innocence. Therefore, kindly provide me with a particular date and place and the method of conducting the hearing. Thanking you Yours truly
§ 1211.2 Definition. As used in this part 1211: *Residential garage door operator* means a vehicular door operator which: ( a ) Serves a residential building of one to four single family units;
( b ) Is rated 600 volts or less; and
( c ) Is intended to be employed in ordinary locations in accordance with NFPA 70 (incorporated by reference, see § 1211.32).
[57 FR 60455, Dec. 21, 1992, as amended at 62 FR 46667, Sept. 4, 1997; 65 FR 70657, Nov. 27, 2000; 81 FR 20228, Apr. 7, 2016]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: WALLDESIGN, INC.,

Debtor,

______________________________

BRIAN WEISS, as Trustee of the

Walldesign Liquidation Trust,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

BELLA CASA PROPERTY SERVICES

LLC,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 17

- 55652

D.C. No. 8:15

- cv

- 01371

- VAP

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Virginia A. Phillips, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 6, 2018 **

Pasadena, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a) (2). 

# FILED

NOV 15 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2

Before: RAWLINSON and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and BOUGH, *** District

Judge.

Bella Casa Property Services appeals a district court order affirming the

bankruptcy court’s grant of summary judg ment to Brian Weiss, acting trustee for

Walldesign, Inc

. The bankruptcy court found various payments made from a

Walldesign bank account to Bella Casa by Michael Bello, a Walldesign officer

,

voidable as fraudulent transfers. We have jurisdiction under 28 U

. S

. C

. § 158(d)(1)

and affirm

.

1. It is undisputed that the transfers to Casa Bella were for the benefit of

Bello, not Walldesign , and were not disclosed to corporate management. Nor is

there any doubt that the funds were Walldesign ’s

. See Matter of Walldesign, Inc.

,

872 F.3d 954, 971 (9th Cir. 2017), cert. denied sub nom. Henry v. Weiss , 138 S. Ct.

2575 (2018)

. They were transferred from an account in Walldesign’s name and

funded with refund check s from Walldesign’s suppliers. The bankruptcy court

therefore did not err in treating the payments as fraudulent transfers. See 11 U.S.C.

§ 548(a) ; Cal. Civ. Code § 3439.04(a)

.

2. A fraudulent conveyance can be recovered even from an initial transferee

that acted in good faith. 11 U.S.C. § 550(a)

– (b)( 1); Cal. Civ. Code § 3439.08(b)(1).

*** The Honorable Stephen R. Bough, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Missouri, sitting by designation.3

T here can be no dispute that Bella Casa was the initial transferee of the funds at

issue

. See Walldesign , 872 F.3d at 967.

3 . The bankruptcy court did not err in considering declarations summariz ing

Walldesign’s fina ncial and bank statements , and documents in the Walldesign

Chapter 11 case docket

. See Fed. R

. Evid. 1006 (allowing admission of summaries

of voluminous writings ).

AFFIRMED

.
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of William C. Wangerin, Deceased. Florence Tedeschi, Appellant; Louise H. Wangerin et al., Respondents.

In this probate proceeding the Surrogate of Queens County directed a verdict admitting the will to probate. The objectant appeals from the decree entered thereon. Decree unanimously affirmed, with costs, payable out of the ■ estate. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ. [See 283 App. Div. 713.]
### §1010a. Optional Federal administration of State recognition payments

#### (a) In general

The Commissioner of Social Security may enter into an agreement with any State (or political subdivision thereof) that provides cash payments on a regular basis to individuals entitled to benefits under this subchapter under which the Commissioner of Social Security shall make such payments on behalf of such State (or subdivision).

#### (b) Agreement terms

#### (1) In general

Such agreement shall include such terms as the Commissioner of Social Security finds necessary to achieve efficient and effective administration of both this subchapter and the State program.

#### (2) Financial terms

Such agreement shall provide for the State to pay the Commissioner of Social Security, at such times and in such installments as the parties may specify—

(A) an amount equal to the expenditures made by the Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to such agreement as payments to individuals on behalf of such State; and

(B) an administration fee to reimburse the administrative expenses incurred by the Commissioner of Social Security in making payments to individuals on behalf of the State.

#### (c) Special disposition of administration fees

Administration fees, upon collection, shall be credited to a special fund established in the Treasury of the United States for State recognition payments for certain World War II veterans. The amounts so credited, to the extent and in the amounts provided in advance in appropriations Acts, shall be available to defray expenses incurred in carrying out this subchapter.

(Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title VIII, §810A, as added Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(1) [title V, §518(a)], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–73.)
Exhibit 10.2


2019 Target Bonus Program


On June 19, 2019, the Compensation Committee of the Board (the “Compensation Committee”) approved a 2019 incentive bonus program (the “2019 Bonus Program”) for the Company’s executive officers and other employees.  The Compensation Committee structured target bonuses for the fiscal year 2019 so that payouts would be determined based in part on achievement against corporate objectives, including:


·    Non-GAAP net income from operations for 2019;


·    Free cash flow for 2019; and


·    Completion of research and development product milestones in 2019.


For target bonuses for the fiscal year 2019, the Compensation Committee established performance goals for each of the above metrics that are aligned with corporate objectives.  While these various performance goals were selected, they are merely non-binding guidelines to be used as one factor in determining the actual bonuses earned.


The 2019 performance goals approved by the Compensation Committee take into account the anticipated impact on the Company’s business for the remainder of 2019 arising from Huawei Technologies and certain affiliates being placed on the “Entity List”.


It is expected that, in the first quarter of 2020, the Compensation Committee will review the Company’s fiscal year 2019 corporate performance against each of the corporate goals and other aspects of corporate and individual performance to determine any actual bonus awards for performance related to fiscal year 2019.
### SUBCHAPTER VIII—UNITED STATES ENRICHMENT CORPORATION PRIVATIZATION
§ 1750.7 Provision for changes in the standard. ( a ) Section 5 of the act provides for the possibility of changes in the commercial standard first established pursuant to section 3 of the act and allows a period of 1 year and 90 days for compliance with such changes after they are published.
( b ) Any person wishing to propose a change in this standard shall submit to the Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Washington, D.C. 20207, the proposed change. Before a change is recommended, the Consumer Product Safety Commission shall secure advice and consultation from public or private sources including particularly the household refrigerator manufacturing industry and the Division of Maternal and Child Health, Health Resources and Services Administration, Public Health Service, Department of Health and Human Services. The Commission shall then take such action as it deems appropriate.
[38 FR 34729, Dec. 18, 1973, as amended at 51 FR 10, Jan. 2, 1986; 52 FR 406, Jan. 6, 1987]
Exhibit 31.1





Rule 13A-14(a)/ 15D-14(a) Certification


Of Chief Executive Officer





I, Raffaele M. Branca, certify that:





1.           I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-Q of VSB Bancorp, Inc.;





2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.           The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





a.           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b.           [Omitted in accordance with SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]; and





c.           Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





d.           Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.           The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a.           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b.           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.





Date: August 10, 2010/s/ Raffaele M. BrancaRaffaele M. BrancaPresident and CEO
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0000636

29-DEC-2016

10:53 AM
§ 270.316 Public hearings. ( a ) During the course of an investigation by a Team, if the Director considers it to be in the public interest, NIST may hold a public hearing for the purposes of gathering testimony from witnesses and informing the public on the progress of the investigation.
( b ) Should NIST plan to hold a public hearing, NIST will publish a notice in the Federal Register, setting forth the date, time, and place of the hearing, and procedures for members of the public wishing to speak at the hearing. In addition, witnesses may be subpoenaed to provide testimony at a public hearing, in accordance with § 270.315 of this subpart.
( c ) The Director, or his designee, will preside over any public hearing held pursuant to this section.
Exhibit
32.1
 ****
 ****
 ****
 ****
 **CERTIFICATION**
 Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Brand Intermediate Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul T.
Wood, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:
 
 1.
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Date:  May 11, 2005
    By:
    /s/  Paul T.
WoodChairman,
      Chief Executive Officer, President and
Director
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.