alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[4910-I3-PI

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2009-1029; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-103-AD; Amendme

l~~~ I

39-**; AD *o/~O/O-14-03

RIN 2120-AA64

/JJNoJJtI~

m 17ID

INmAI.~,'SI(;

Air",:orthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2B 19 (Regional Jet Series "OU'l'I"Gsn"'[)~

INI'TIAlMi'(i,

DATI;

l1T'O'G $YMOOL

"~1"JV.lSIS.I(;

AT>,

OOUTlSG snlllOl

"ITlAlS'Sro

nMf

ROUT'Nn SV"'f10l

INrll,'L"SI(i

m

<nIIT'SG SVMOOL

S'T'AUSI(l

"

~"'ml(; S\"MIIOL

"~ITlAI.SiSI(l

m

Following in-flight test deployments, several Air-Driven generators

(ADGs) failed to come oo-Iine. Investigation revealed that, as a result of a

wiring anomaly that had not been detected during ADG manufacture, a

short ci.rcuit was possible between certain internal wires and their metallic

over-braided shields, which could result in the ADG not providing power

when deployed. * * *

essential for safe flight. We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe

infoffilation (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify

and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsad

The lU1safecondition is failure of the ADG, which could lead to loss of several functio

condition as:

100 & 440) Airplanes

condition on these products.

ACTION: Final rule.

(DOT).

products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness

SUMi\1ARY: We are superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD) for the

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department orTransportation
co. rtJ""c~<;T.:;

[4910-13-1'1 ~;~~ttJOr.

DEPARTMENT OFTRAl'iSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

(Docket No. FAA-2009-1029; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-j 03-AD; Amendment

39-**; AD **]

RIN 2120~AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional Jet Series <MT6

Sl '( to

100 & 440) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation

(DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: We are superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD) for the

products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness

infOimatioll (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify

and correct <"Ill unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the ullRafe

condition as:

Following in-flight test deployments, several Air-Driven gencmtors

(ADOs) failed to come on-line. Investigation reve,tled that, us a result ora

wiring anomaly that had not been detected during ADG manufacture, a

sllort circuit was possible between certain internal wires and their metallic

over~braided shields, which could result ill the ADG not providing power

when deployed. >I< >I< >I<

The unsafe condition is failure oftlIe ADO, which could lead to loss of several functions

essential for safe flight. We are issuing tl1isAD to require actions to correct the unsafe

~~Tfi~.

-~,

~~r~~(tJl·14w

JWrn•.v.lI"

J. C flam:!

.I

"[71"')//0

ltOUl,t<u .""',, ••

~'7

""''';.u..••• ,ce..

~"'~I -":J~""""7/,o
## F I FTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ C ase No. 5D 20 23- 1976 LT Case No. 2012

- 001770

- CFAWS

_____________________________ J OHN O. R ILEY , A ppellant,

v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , A ppellee.

_____________________________

3.85 0 A ppeal from t he Circuit Court for Volusia County

. Raul A. Zambrano , Judge

. Joshu a E. Adams, Orlando , for Appellant

. Ashle y Mo ody, Attorne y Gene ral, Tallahassee , an d Dougla s T. Squire , Assistan t Attorney Genera l, Daytona Beach , for Appellee

.

Jul y 3 0, 2 024

P ER C URIAM

. A FFIRMED

.

E DWARDS , C.J., and S OUD and B OATWRIGHT , JJ., concur .2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331
.

_____________________________
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0714

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

HEATHER ROSE JOHNSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including February 12, 2024, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 5 2024

01/05/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0714
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF
PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Tal L. Kapelner, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that:

(i)       
          The accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended
          March 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)       
          The information in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
          financial condition and results of operations of Tally-Ho Ventures, Inc. (the
          Company).

| | /s/ Tal L. Kapelner
Tal L. Kapelner
President
| | ---------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT
        32.2




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002








In
      connection with the Amended Yearly Report of Medical International Technology,
      Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending October 31, 2007,
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), I, Michel Bayouk, Secretary and Principal Accounting Officer of
      the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the amended Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
                of the
                Company.









/s/ 
 Michel
      Bayouk


Michel
      Bayouk


Secretary
      and Principal Accounting Officer





January
      8, 2008
§ 1018.5 Advisory Committee Management Officer. The Chairman shall designate an Advisory Committee Management Officer who shall: ( a ) Exercise control and supervision over the establishment, procedures, and accomplishments of all advisory committees established or utilized by the Commission;
( b ) Assemble and maintain the reports, records, and other papers of any such committee during its existence, and carry out, on behalf of the Secretary of the Commission, the provisions of section 552 of Title 5, United States Code (Freedom of Information Act) and the Commission's Procedures for Disclosure or Production of Information Under the Freedom of Information Act (16 CFR part 1015) with respect to such reports, records, and other papers; and
( c ) Perform such other functions as specified in this part.
#### § 1611.1 Purpose and scope.

The purpose of this standard is to promulgate a minimum standard for flammability of vinyl plastic film which are subject to the requirements of the Flammable Fabrics Act.
§ 1115.29 Final determination regarding form and content. ( a ) *Commission or court discretion.* The recall notice content required by this subpart must be included in a recall notice whether or not the firm admits the existence of a defect or of an actual or potential hazard, and whether or not the firm concedes the accuracy or applicability of all of the information contained in the recall notice. The Commission will make the final determination as to the form and content of the recall notice for purposes of an order under section 15(c) or (d) of the CPSA (15 U.S.C. 2064(c) or (d)), and a United States district court will make the final determination as to the form and content of a recall notice for purposes of an order under section 12 of the CPSA (15 U.S.C. 2061).
( b ) *Recall notice exceptions.* The Commission for purposes of an order under section 15(c) or (d) of the CPSA (15 U.S.C. 2064(c) or (d)), or a United States district court for purposes of an order under section 12 of the CPSA (15 U.S.C. 2061), may determine that one or more of the recall notice requirements set forth in this subpart is not required, and will not be included, in a recall notice.
( c ) *Commission approval.* Before a firm may publish, broadcast, or otherwise disseminate a recall notice to be issued pursuant to an order under section 15(c) or
( d ) of the CPSA (15 U.S.C. 2064(c) or (d)), the Commission must review and agree in writing to all aspects of the notice.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 25 (Friday, February 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 5887]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2617]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 4616]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition; 
Determinations: ``The Drawings of Jim Dine''

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 (68 FR 19875), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``The Drawings of Jim Dine,'' imported from 
abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners. I also determine that the 
exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the National Gallery of 
Art, Washington, DC, from on or about March 21, 2004, to on or about 
August 1, 2004, and at possible additional venues yet to be determined, 
is in the national interest. Public notice of these determinations is 
ordered to be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julianne Simpson, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202/619-6529). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-
44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: January 28, 2004.
C. Miller Crouch,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural 
Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 04-2617 Filed 2-5-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
§ 712.9 Deadlines for submission of Schedule 1 declarations, reports, advance notifications, and amendments. Declarations, reports, advance notifications, and amendments required under this part must be postmarked by the appropriate date identified in supplement no. 2 to this part 712. Required declarations, reports, advance notifications, and amendments include: ( a ) Annual declaration on past activities (Schedule 1 chemical production during the previous calendar year);
( b ) Annual report on exports and imports of Schedule 1 chemicals from facilities, trading companies, and other persons (during the previous calendar year);
( c ) Combined declaration and report (production of Schedule 1 chemicals, as well as exports or imports of the same or different Schedule 1 chemicals, by a declared facility during the previous calendar year);
( d ) Annual declaration on anticipated activities (anticipated production of Schedule 1 chemicals in the next calendar year);
( e ) Advance notification of any export to or import from another State Party;
( f ) Initial declaration of a new Schedule 1 chemical production facility; and
( g ) Amended declaration or report, including combined declaration and report.
EXHIBIT 99.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Performance Capital
Management, LLC (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David  J.  Caldwell,  Chief  Operations  Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (section) 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that,  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


                                           /s/  David J. Caldwell
                                          -------------------------
                                          David J. Caldwell
                                          Chief Operations Officer
                                          April 24, 2003


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  be  deemed  filed by the Company for purposes of
Section  18  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended.


<PAGE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

_________________________________________ )

LUIS IVAN POBLETE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Case No. 1 7

- mc

- 00158 (APM)

)

CHUNG HUILO

, )

)

Defendant. )

_________________________________________ )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter comes before the court on review of Plaintiff Luis Ivan Poblete’s “Pleading in

Chance ry Equity.” Plaintiff proceeds pro se. The court dismisses the pleading sua sponte for

failure to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint contain “ a short

and plain state ment ” of the basis for the court’ s jurisdiction; “a short and plain statement” of the

pleader’s claim, showing she or he is entitled to relief; and a demand for relief

. See Fed. R. Civ.

P. 8(a). The purpose of th is minimum pleading standard is to give fair notice to the defendant of

the claim s being asserted, such that the defendant can prepare a responsive answer and adequate

defense , as well as determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. Butler v. Cal. St.

Disbursement Unit , 990 F. Supp. 2d 8, 9 (D.D.C. 2013)

. Pleadings filed by pro se litigants are

held to less stringent standards than those filed by lawyers, but all litigants must comply with the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Moore v. Agency for Int’l Dev. , 994 F.2d 874, 876 (D .C.

Cir. 1993).2

The court has reviewed Plaintiff’s Complaint and, i n a word

, it is unin telligible. The

Complaint is titled as being filed in both the federal district court and the federal bankruptcy court

for the District of Columbia. At no point does Plaintiff identify Defendant Chung Huilo or make

any allegations pertaining to Defendant

. Plaintiff states only that he “ha[s] a CONFLICT with the

rules of law” and seek s “equitable relief” in the form of “ the extinguishment and the full accounting

of the ledge r record.” See Compl., ECF No. 1, at 7. These statements neither constitute a “short

and plain statement” of the court’s jurisdiction and material facts , nor convey the nature of the

dispute

. Therefore, a s drafted, the C o mplaint fails to meet the standard set forth in Rule 8(a) and

must be dismissed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 (a).

An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.

_____________________________ Date: January 30, 2017 Amit P. Mehta

United States District Judge
June 26, 2015 

 

 IN RESPONSE, PLEASE 

REFER TO: M150623 

 

MEMORANDUM TO: Mark A. Satorius 

 Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Richard J. Laufer, Acting Secretary /RA/

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS – BRIEFING ON HUMAN CAPITAL 

AND EEO, 9:00 A.M., TUESDAY, JUNE 23, 2015, 

COMMISSIONERS’ CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE WHITE FLINT 

NORTH, ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND (OPEN TO PUBLIC 

ATTENDANCE) 

The Commission was briefed by the NRC staff on the agency’s Human Capital and Equal 

Employment Opportunity (EEO) Programs. Topics presented included NRC human capital 

snapshot, organizational readiness to change, shaping the future workforce, transforming 

learning to enhance employee agility, Senior Executive Service Candidate Development 

Program candidate perspective on the future, and diversity and inclusion update. The 

Commission was also addressed by the Chapter Executive Vice-President and Chief Steward of 

the National Treasury Employee Union (NTEU). 

The staff should consider reaching out to the Department of Energy regarding the development 

of the detailed modeling and simulation of current nuclear power plants, being conducted by 

Oak Ridge National Laboratory under the Consortium for Advanced Simulation of Light Water 

Reactors (CASL) Program, to determine if this program could benefit NRC training and other 

regulatory activities. 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA 

 OIG 

 OPA 

 Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR
### Part B—Centers and Programs
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6447
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JAMES A. BUTLER, a/k/a Willie James Butler, a/k/a John Thomas, a/k/a Grady, Defendant - Appellant.
No. 05-6495
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JAMES A. BUTLER, a/k/a Willie James Butler, a/k/a John Thomas, a/k/a Grady, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CR-91-44) Submitted: September 27, 2005 Decided: September 30, 2005- 2 - Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James A. Butler, Appellant Pro Se. Gurney Wingate Grant, II, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: James A. Butler appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions for correction of sentence under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 36 and for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. SeeUnited States v. Butler , No. CR-91-44 (Jan. 27, 2005; Mar. 15, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 1500.127 Substances with multiple hazards. ( a ) Any article that presents more than one type of hazard (for example, if the article is both toxic and flammable) must be labeled with: An affirmative statement of each such hazard; the precautionary measures describing the action to be followed or avoided for each such hazard; instructions, when necessary or appropriate, for first-aid treatment of persons suffering from the ill effects that may result from each such hazard; instructions for handling and storage of articles that require special care in handling and storage because of more than one type of hazard presented by the article; and the common or usual name (or the chemical name if there is no common or usual name) for each hazardous component present in the article.
( b ) Label information referring to the possibility of one hazard may be combined with parallel information concerning any additional hazards presented by the article if the resulting condensed statement contains all of the information needed for dealing with each type of hazard presented by the article.
[38 FR 27012, Sept. 27, 1973; 38 FR 30105, Nov. 1, 1973]
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 6042** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. STEVE DIAS, a/k/a Troy, a/k/a O’Neil Guthrie , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. Henry E. Hudson , District Judge. ( 3:04

- cr - 00259

- HEH

- 2 )

Submitted : May 1 8 , 2016 Decided: May 23, 2016

Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Steve Dias, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Arthur Garnett, Katherine Lee Martin, Assistant United States Attorney s , Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circu it.2 PER CURIAM:
Steve Dias appeals the district court ’ s order denying his
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the dis trict

court. United States v. Diaz , No. 3:04

- cr - 00259

- HEH

- 2 (E.D. Va.
Nov. 18, 2015) ; see United States v. Mann , 709 F.3d 301, 304

- 05 (4th Cir. 2013) (reviewing disposition of a § 3582(c)(2) motion
for abuse of discretion ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Mary T. O’Laughlin, Respondent, against Federal Reserve Bank of New York et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Present — Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Santry and Bergan, JJ.