alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T R OB E R T B OL OT AU L O F R AN C I S C O, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 10- 73512 A ge nc yN o. A 070- 086- 663 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A ugus t8, 2012 ** B efo re: A L A R C Ó N , B E R Z O N , an dIK U T A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. R obe rtB ol ot aul o F r anc i s c o, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of the P hi l i ppi ne s , pe t i t i ons f o rr e v ie w o f

th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e rd e n y in g h is m ot i on t o r e ope n. O urj ur i s di c t i on i s gove rne d by8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f or abus e of di s c r e t i on the de ni a l of am ot i on t o r e ope n, a nd r e vi e w de novo due



# FI LED AU G 14 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 73512 2 p r o c e s s c la im s . Moh am m ed v. G on zales , 4 0 0 F .3 d7 8 5 , 7 9 1 - 9 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) . W e d e n yin p art an dd is m is s in p a rt th e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g F r an c is c o ’s m o tio n to r e ope n a s unt i m e l ybe c aus e the m ot i on w a s f i l e d m or e than thi rt e e n y e ar s a f t e rthe f i na l or de rof

r e m ova l a nd di d notqua l i f yf ora n e xc e pt i on t o the 90- dayf i l i ng lim ita tio n . See 8 C . F . R . § 1 00 3. 2(c) (2)- (3). F r a n c is c o ’s c o n te n tio n th a t th e B I A v io la te ddu e p r o c e s s b yd e n y in g h is m o tio n to r e o p e n f

a ils . Se e La ta v . I

NS , 204 F . 3d 1241, 1246 ( 9th C i r . 2000) ( r e q u ir in g as h o w in g o f e rr o rto p r e v a il o n adu e p r o c e s s c la im ) . T o th e e x te n t F r an c is c o c o n te n d s th a t th e B I A s h o u ldh av e in v o k e dits au th o r ityto r e o p e n h is p r o c e e d in g s s u as p o n te , w e la c kju r is d ic tio n to r e v ie w h is c o n te n tio n . See Mej i a-H erna ndezv. H

older , 63 3 F . 3d 81 8, 82 3-24 (9th C i r. 20 11 ). W e la c kju r is d ic tio n to c o n s id e rF r an c is c o ’s u n e x h au s te dc o n te n tio n th a t h is s ta tu s a s ad e r iv a tiv e b e n e f ic iaryo f a n e ar lie r - f

ile dv is ap e titio n e n title s h im to r e o p e n in g . See B a rr o n v . A s h c r o ft , 35 8 F . 3d 67 4, 67 8 (9th C i r. 20 04 ) ( thi s c ou rt l ac ks j uri sdi ct i on ov ercont ent i on s notra i se d b ef ore the B IA ). P E T I T I O N F O R R E V I E W D E N I E D in p a r t ; D I S M I S S E D in p a r t .
#### Sylvia Brauer, Respondent, v. Louis H. Brauer, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Breitel and Botein, JJ.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-15-0143:  Project AIM and Centers of Expertise

Accession Number: ML15292A249

Date Released: Tuesday, December 1, 2015

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML15292A258 - SECY-15-0143:  Project AIM and Centers of Expertise (9 page(s), 11/9/2015)
    - ML15292A411 - SECY-15-0143:  Summary of Lessons Learned (Enclosure 1) (4 page(s), 11/9/2015)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### § 3.2 Nature of adjudicative proceedings.

Adjudicative proceedings are those formal proceedings conducted under one or more of the statutes administered by the Commission which are required by statute to be determined on the record after opportunity for an agency hearing. The term includes hearings upon objections to orders relating to the promulgation, amendment, or repeal of rules under sections 4, 5 and 6 of the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act, but does not include rulemaking proceedings up to the time when the Commission determines under § 1.26(g) of this chapter that objections sufficient to warrant the holding of a public hearing have been filed. The term also includes proceedings for the assessment of civil penalties pursuant to § 1.94 of this chapter. The term does not include other proceedings such as negotiations for and Commission consideration of the entry of consent orders; investigational hearings as distinguished from proceedings after the issuance of a complaint; requests for extensions of time to comply with final orders or other proceedings involving compliance with final orders; proceedings for the promulgation of industry guides or trade regulation rules; or the promulgation of substantive rules and regulations.

[74 FR 1820, Jan. 13, 2009]
No: II-14-033 June 16, 2014

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416 

NRC Assigns New Resident Inspector to Surry Nuclear Power Plant

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Atlanta have selected Clinton Jones as the resident inspector 

for Dominion’s Surry nuclear power plant, located near Surry, Va.

The Surry plant is located about 17 miles northwest of Newport News, 

and Jones joins NRC Senior Resident Inspector Phil McKenna at the site. 

Clinton Jones joined the NRC in 2012 as a project engineer in the 

Resident Inspector Development Program in the Region II office. 

Before joining the agency, Jones was attached to the Department of 

the Navy as a qualified senior shift refueling engineer based out of the 

Norfolk Naval Shipyard. As a civilian engineer for the Navy, he refueled 

Ohio class ballistic missile submarines and defueled and deactivated Los Angeles class submarines. He also 

served as the lead reactor vessel head maintenance engineer for Improved Los Angeles class subs and Nimitz 

class aircraft carriers in the Atlantic fleet. 

Jones received a Bachelor of Science degree in ocean engineering from Virginia Polytechnic Institute 

and State University in Blacksburg, Va.

“Clinton Jones has the experience and commitment to carry out the NRC mission of protecting people and 

the environment by helping to ensure the safety of the Surry plant,” said NRC Region II Administrator Victor 

McCree. 

At least two NRC resident inspectors are assigned to each operating U.S. commercial nuclear plant. They 

serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major work projects and 

interacting with plant workers and the public. Resident inspectors can serve at a reactor site for up to seven years. 

The Surry resident inspectors can be reached at 757-357-2101.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-55,746B]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on October 7, 2004 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at WestPoint Stevens, Clemson Finishing Plant, Clemson, South Carolina.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC this 16th day of November, 2004.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 04-26396  Filed 11-29-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1564-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the                               ( print page 67751)                            State of New York (FEMA-1564-DR), dated October 1, 2004, and related determinations.                     

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

November 10, 2004. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of New York is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of October 1, 2004: Chautauqua County for Public Assistance. 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 Individuals and Households Program-Other Needs, 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.) 

Michael D. Brown, 

Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security. 

[FR Doc. 04-25661 Filed 11-18-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
§ 1502.22 Unavailability of presiding officer. ( a ) If the presiding officer is unable to act for any reason, the Commission will assign the powers and duties to another presiding officer. The substitution will not affect the hearing, except as the new presiding officer may order.
( b ) Any motion based on the substitution must be made within 10 days.
----

----

**Exhibit      32.2**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of and for the period(s) covered in the                Report. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                October 31, 2007 |   |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|--------|

|   | By:    | /s/                Colleen A. Zuhl     |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   |   | Colleen                A. Zuhl         |
|   |   | Chief                Financial Officer |

----

----
### subpart 3—general requirements
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 5

- 00 4 8 7

- C R

Style: Fredis Mauricio Flores v. The State of Texas

Date motion filed * : August 28 , 201 5

Type of motion s : M otion t o Withdraw as C ounsel

Part ies filing motion s : Appell ant ’s Appointed Counsel Janet Celeste Carter

- Blackburn

Document to be filed: N/A

Is appeal accelerated? No

.

Ordered that motion i s :

 Granted

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________

Appellant’s appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel is granted because it

complies with Rule 6.5 (d) and this Court already granted new counsel Allen C. Isbell’s

motion to substitute on August 27, 2015. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 6.5( b), (d). Accordingly,

the Clerk of this Court is directed to remove Janet Celeste Carter

- Blackburn as attorney

for appellant.

Judge ’ s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting individually

Date: September 10, 2015
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3499 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3499

To require the Secretary of Agriculture to use section 32 of the Act of 
 August 24, 1935, to provide compensation to certain poultry producers 
   whose poultry production contracts were terminated or not renewed 
  because of the closure of poultry processing plants and other cost 
    cutting measures undertaken by a poultry processing company in 
                         bankruptcy protection.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 18, 2011

 Mr. Price of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
                referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Secretary of Agriculture to use section 32 of the Act of 
 August 24, 1935, to provide compensation to certain poultry producers 
   whose poultry production contracts were terminated or not renewed 
  because of the closure of poultry processing plants and other cost 
    cutting measures undertaken by a poultry processing company in 
                         bankruptcy protection.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMPENSATION FOR ECONOMIC LOSSES DUE TO LOSS OF POULTRY 
              PRODUCTION CONTRACTS WITH BANKRUPT POULTRY PROCESSING 
              COMPANY.

    Using amounts in the fund established under section 32 of the Act 
of August 24, 1935 (7 U.S.C. 612c), and the authority provided by 
paragraph (3) of the second sentence of such section, the Secretary of 
Agriculture, acting through the Farm Service Agency, shall provide 
compensation to poultry producers whose poultry production contracts 
were terminated or not renewed during the period beginning on December 
1, 2010, and ending on the date of the enactment of this Act, because 
of the closure of poultry processing plants and other cost cutting 
measures undertaken by a poultry processing company in bankruptcy 
protection. A poultry producer seeking compensation under this section 
shall be required to document to the satisfaction of the Secretary the 
termination or non-renewal of a production contract and the subsequent 
economic losses incurred by the producer as a result of the termination 
or non-renewal of the contract by the poultry processing company.
                                 <all>
```
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1

                                 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                                      18 U.S.C.ss.1350,

                                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                       SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly   Report  of  Centennial   Specialty  Foods
Corporation  (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I,  Jeffrey R.  Nieder,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of the  Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                    /s/ JEFFREY R. NIEDER
                                    ---------------------
                                    Jeffrey R. Nieder
                                    Chief Executive Officer
Dated: May 17, 2004
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Louis Grossman, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Callahan, Van Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
### Part C—Monitored Retrievable Storage
**Exhibit
        32.1**
  **CERTIFICATIONS
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Prime Sun Power Inc. on Form 10-Q
        for
        the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
        Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gerald Sullivan, Acting
        Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
        certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
        906
        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:
  (1)  
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
        of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (2)  
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.


May
        15,
        2008
 By:
              /s/
                Gerald
                SullivanName:
                Gerald SullivanTitle:
                  Acting Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
                  Officer
### Part B—Program of Monitoring, Initial Health Evaluations, and Treatment
§ 1502.31 Summary decisions. ( a ) After the hearing commences, a participant may move, with or without supporting affidavits, for a summary decision on any issue in the hearing. Any other participant may, within 10 days after service of the motion, which time may be extended for an additional 10 days for good cause, serve opposing affidavits or countermove for summary decision. The presiding officer may set the matter for argument and call for the submission of briefs.
( b ) The presiding officer will grant the motion if the objections, requests for hearing, other pleadings, affidavits, and other material filed in connection with the hearing, or matters officially noticed, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that a participant is entitled to summary decision.
( c ) Affidavits should set forth facts that would be admissible in evidence and show affirmatively that the affiant is competent to testify to the matters stated. When a properly supported motion for summary decision is made, a participant opposing the motion may not rest upon mere allegations or denials or general descriptions of positions and contentions; affidavits or other responses must set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue of fact for the hearing.
( d ) Should it appear from the affidavits of a participant opposing the motion that for sound reasons stated, facts essential to justify the opposition cannot be presented by affidavit, the presiding officer may deny the motion for summary decision, allow additional time to permit affidavits or additional evidence to be obtained, or issue other just order.
( e ) If on motion under this section a summary decision is not rendered upon the whole case or for all the relief asked, and evidentiary facts need to be developed, the presiding officer will issue an order specifying the facts that appear without substantial controversy and directing further evidentiary proceedings. The facts so specified will be deemed established.
( f ) A participant submitting or opposing a motion for summary decision may obtain interlocutory review by the Commission of a summary decision of the presiding officer.
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual report of Tranquility, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the "Report"), I, Dominick Pope, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/Dominick Pope Dominick Pope, Chief Financial Officer Date: February 19, 2010
### subpart 5—[repealed]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 111–358, title IX, §901(c)(1), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 4044, struck out heading for subpart 5 "NATIONAL ENERGY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT".