alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 348 

To prohibit the Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration from 

requiring the replacement of street and highway signs that are in upper 

case letters with such signs that are in mixed case lettering with the 

initial letter in upper case followed by lower case lettering. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 19, 2011 

Mr. SENSENBRENNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration from requiring the replacement of street 

and highway signs that are in upper case letters with 

such signs that are in mixed case lettering with the 

initial letter in upper case followed by lower case lettering. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NO NEW SIGNS. 

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Ad5 ministrator of the Federal Highway Administration may 

6 not require the replacement of street and highway signs 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 348 IH

1 that are in upper case letters with signs that are in mixed 

2 case lettering with the initial letter in upper case followed 

3 by lower case lettering. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
NRC, U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ISSUE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL 

IMPACT STATEMENT FOR NEW REACTORS AT LEVY COUNTY SITE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 

Jacksonville District, have completed the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the 

Combined Licenses (COL) for the proposed Levy County Units 1 and 2.

The NRC concludes in the FEIS that there are no environmental impacts that would 

preclude issuing the COLs for construction and operation of the proposed reactors at the site, 

near Crystal River, Fla. The USACE will use the information in the FEIS in making its federal 

permit decision in accordance with the Clean Water Act and Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.

The NRC’s publishing of the FEIS is only part of the overall Levy County COL review. 

The agency staff continues to compile its final safety evaluation report (SER), which will include 

recommendations from the NRC’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards, an independent 

group of nuclear safety experts. The NRC’s Atomic Safety and Licensing Board is currently 

conducting a proceeding on challenges to the staff’s environmental review. The NRC’s five 

Commissioners must also conduct a mandatory hearing regarding the application and the staff’s 

review. All of these items must be completed before the NRC can reach a final decision on the 

COL application.

Progress Energy submitted a COL application July 30, 2008, seeking permission to 

construct and operate two AP1000 nuclear reactors at the Levy County site. The AP1000 is a 

Westinghouse 1,100 megawatt electric pressurized-water reactor design the NRC certified in 

December 2011.

The FEIS will be available on the NRC website. The NRC staff, in cooperation with 

USACE, gathered comments from the community near the site in December 2008 during the 

environmental scoping process. The agencies issued a draft EIS in August 2010 and met with the 

local community again in September 2010 for additional comments.

The three-volume FEIS is also available via the NRC’s electronic document database, 

ADAMS, by entering accession numbers ML12100A063, ML12100A068 and ML12100A070 in 

the ADAMS search engine. In addition, a hardbound copy of the DEIS will be available for 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 12-045 April 27, 2012
public inspection at four local libraries: 1) the Citrus County Coastal Region Library at 8619 

West Crystal St. in Crystal River; 2) the Dunnellon Branch Library at 20351 Robinson Road in 

Dunnellon, Fla.; 3) the AF Knotts Public Library at 11 56th St. in Yankeetown, Fla.; and 4) the 

Bronson Public Library at 600 Gilbert St. in Bronson, Fla.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.
### SUBCHAPTER III—TRANSFERS OF FUNCTIONS
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL
                          FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bekem Metals, Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Yermek
Kudabayev, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

Date: August 14, 2006                                 /s/ Yermek Kudabayev      
                                                     Yermek Kudabayev,
                                                     Principal Financial Officer
```
### §12183. New construction and alterations in public accommodations and commercial facilities

#### (a) Application of term

Except as provided in subsection (b), as applied to public accommodations and commercial facilities, discrimination for purposes of section 12182(a) of this title includes—

(1) a failure to design and construct facilities for first occupancy later than 30 months after July 26, 1990, that are readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities, except where an entity can demonstrate that it is structurally impracticable to meet the requirements of such subsection in accordance with standards set forth or incorporated by reference in regulations issued under this subchapter; and

(2) with respect to a facility or part thereof that is altered by, on behalf of, or for the use of an establishment in a manner that affects or could affect the usability of the facility or part thereof, a failure to make alterations in such a manner that, to the maximum extent feasible, the altered portions of the facility are readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities, including individuals who use wheelchairs. Where the entity is undertaking an alteration that affects or could affect usability of or access to an area of the facility containing a primary function, the entity shall also make the alterations in such a manner that, to the maximum extent feasible, the path of travel to the altered area and the bathrooms, telephones, and drinking fountains serving the altered area, are readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities where such alterations to the path of travel or the bathrooms, telephones, and drinking fountains serving the altered area are not disproportionate to the overall alterations in terms of cost and scope (as determined under criteria established by the Attorney General).

#### (b) Elevator

Subsection (a) shall not be construed to require the installation of an elevator for facilities that are less than three stories or have less than 3,000 square feet per story unless the building is a shopping center, a shopping mall, or the professional office of a health care provider or unless the Attorney General determines that a particular category of such facilities requires the installation of elevators based on the usage of such facilities.

(Pub. L. 101–336, title III, §303, July 26, 1990, 104 Stat. 358.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 18 months after July 26, 1990, see section 310(a), (b) of Pub. L. 101–336, set out as a note under section 12181 of this title.
### §1320b–24. Consultation with Tribal Technical Advisory Group

The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall maintain within the Centers for Medicaid & Medicare Services 1 (CMS) a Tribal Technical Advisory Group (TTAG), which was first established in accordance with requirements of the charter dated September 30, 2003, and the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall include in such Group a representative of a national urban Indian health organization and a representative of the Indian Health Service. The inclusion of a representative of a national urban Indian health organization in such Group shall not affect the nonapplication of chapter 10 of title 5 to such Group.

(Pub. L. 111–5, div. B, title V, §5006(e)(1), Feb. 17, 2009, 123 Stat. 510; Pub. L. 117–286, §4(a)(250), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4333.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, and not as part of the Social Security Act which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–286 substituted "chapter 10 of title 5" for "the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.)".

1 So in original. Probably should be "Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services".
#### § 100.2 Description.

Seal: On a shield an open book beneath which is a lamp of knowledge emitting rays above in base two crossed quills. Around the whole a wreath of single leaves, surrounded by an outer band bearing between two stars the words “U.S. Department of Commerce” in the upper portion and “Bureau of the Census” in the lower portion, the lettering concentric with an inner beaded rim and an outer dentilated rim.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 23, 2020

No. 04-19-00661-CV

STATE FARM COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF TEXAS,

Appellant

v.

Andrew Wayne BOCK,

Appellee

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CI19802

Honorable Cynthia Marie Chapa, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

The court reporter’s third request for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record is 

GRANTED. The reporter’s record is due on or before January 31, 2020. No further extensions 

will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 23rd day of January, 2020.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court
Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofstreetTRACKS® Gold Trust (the"Trust") on Form 10-Q for the period endingMarch 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the "Report"), I, JamesLowe, principal financial officer of World Gold Trust Services, LLC,the sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Trust.

/s/ JamesLowe*                    

JamesLowe** Chief Financial Officer (principal financialofficer)May 11, 2005

|         |                                                                                                                                                     |
|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| *  | The originallyexecuted copy of this Certification will be maintained at theSponsor's offices and will be made available for inspection uponrequest. |

|          |                                                                                                                                            |
|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| **  | The Registrant is a trust and Mr. Loweis signing in his capacity as an officer of World Gold Trust Services,LLC, the sponsor of the Trust. |

----
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In the Interest of E.G

. , a Child

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 9

- 00 03 5

- CV

Trial court case number: 20 16

- 0 3 15 9 J

Trial court: 31 4 th District Court of Harris County

Appellant s , A.G. and S.C., have filed notices of appeal of the trial court’s Final Decree for Termination, signed on December 31, 2018. And, t he notice of appeal of S.C. reflects that she is indigent and may proceed on appeal without payment of costs. Se e T EX

. R. C IV

. P. 145(a); T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1(a), (b)(1).

The clerk’s record was due to be filed in this Court by January 14, 2019. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 28.4(a)(1), 35.1(b). On January 1 6 , 201 9 , the Clerk of this Court notified the
trial court clerk that a clerk’s record had not been filed and directed the trial court clerk to file the clerk’s record no later than January 2 8 , 2019

. Neither a clerk’s record n or a motion for an extension of time has been filed

. Accordingly, the trial court clerk is
ordered to file, at no cost to appellants, a clerk’s record in this appeal within 10 days
of the date of this order

. No extensions of time will be granted

. 1 See id. 28.4( b )( 2 ), 35.3(c)

. If the clerk’s record is not filed as directed, we may abate the appeal and remand the case to the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the failure to file the clerk’s record in this appeal

.
It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Julie Countiss

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court Date: ___ January 31, 2019

____

1 Because this appeal involves the termination of the parent

- child relationship , this Court is required to bring the appeal to final disposition within 180 days of the date the first notice of appeal was filed

, so far as re asonably possible. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2, reprinted

in T EX

. G OV ’ T

. C ODE A NN

., tit. 2, subtit. F app.
### SUBCHAPTER I—ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION
### SUBCHAPTER I—PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES
### §10250. Termination of Office

The Office shall cease to exist not later than 30 days after the date 7 years after December 22, 1987.

(Pub. L. 97–425, title IV, §410, as added Pub. L. 100–202, §101(d) [title III], Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1329–104, 1329–121; Pub. L. 100–203, title V, §5041, Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–247; amended Pub. L. 102–486, title VIII, §802(a), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2923.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 100–202 and Pub. L. 100–203 added identical sections.

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–486 substituted "7 years" for "5 years".
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

JAMES MICHAEL DURGIN, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 19-10449 

D.C. No. 3:19-cr-00333-WHO-1 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

William H. Orrick, III, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 5, 2020**

Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

James Michael Durgin appeals from the district court’s judgment and 

challenges the 15-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for 

escape from custody, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 751(a), 4082(a). We have 

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 7 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 19-10449

Durgin contends that the district court impermissibly lengthened his 

sentence in order to promote his rehabilitation in violation of Tapia v. United 

States, 564 U.S. 319 (2011). We review for plain error, see United States v. Grant, 

664 F.3d 276, 279 (9th Cir. 2011), and conclude that there is none. The district 

court’s recommendation that the Bureau of Prisons designate Durgin to a facility in 

Massachusetts near his family who could support him when he is released was not 

improper. See Tapia, 564 U.S. at 334 (district court does not run afoul of 18 

U.S.C. § 3582(a) by recommending a specific prison facility for the defendant). 

Moreover, while the court briefly referenced the need for the sentence to promote 

rehabilitation, the record shows that rehabilitation played no role in the court’s 

sentencing decision. Rather, the court selected a sentence at the bottom of the 

Guidelines range, with no supervised release to follow, after considering only 

proper sentencing factors, including the need to provide just punishment for the 

offense and Durgin’s criminal history and characteristics. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                                 SUBSIDIARIES OF
                        ARDEN REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                      NAME                                                     JURISDICTIONS
<S>                                                                            <C>
Arden-Westwood, LLC                                                               Delaware

Activity Business Center Limited Partnership                                      Delaware

Arden Realty Finance III, LLC                                                     Delaware

Arden Realty Finance IV, LLC                                                      Delaware

Arden Realty Finance V, LLC                                                       Delaware

Arden Realty VI, LLC                                                              Delaware

Arden Realty Finance Partnership, L.P.                                            Delaware

145 South Fairfax, LLC                                                            California

Next Edge, Inc.                                                                   California
</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1765

In Re: CAROLINE YOUNT,

Debtor.

_________________________

RICK ALLEN YOUNT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CAROLINE YOUNT,

Debtor - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior

District Judge. (CA-97-25-2, BK-96-20884, AP-96-2115)

Submitted: July 30, 1998 Decided: August 25, 1998

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rick Allen Yount, Appellant Pro Se. J. Douglas Crane, Morgantown,

West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Rick Allen Yount appeals the district court’s orders (1) affirming the bankruptcy court’s order determining that a debt owed

to him was dischargeable in bankruptcy and (2) denying his motion

for reconsideration. Our review of the record and the district

court’s opinions discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Yount v. Yount, Nos.

CA-97-25-2; BK-96-20884 (N.D.W. Va. May 4 & 13, 1998). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No: II-14-051 September 23, 2014

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416

NRC Schedules Oct. 1 Meetings to Discuss Watts Bar Nuclear Plant 

Unit 2 Construction

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled two meetings for Wednesday, Oct. 1, 

to discuss the status of the Watts Bar Unit 2 construction project.

Watts Bar Unit 2 is being built by the Tennessee Valley Authority near Spring City, Tenn., 

which is about 60 miles southwest of Knoxville. TVA also operates Unit 1 at the site.

The meetings will be held back-to-back, beginning at 5 p.m. at the meeting room of the Comfort 

Inn, 2811 Decatur Pike in Athens, Tenn. Prior to the meetings, the NRC staff will be available 

beginning at 4:30 p.m. for informal discussions with the public.

At the 5 p.m. meeting, NRC will discuss the project with TVA officials. The discussion will 

include the project’s status, major milestones and potential challenges that could impact the unit’s 

completion schedule. Beginning at 5:30 p.m., NRC officials will discuss the status of NRC licensing 

and inspection activities with members of the public.

Members of the public who are unable to attend the meetings can participate via a 

teleconference/webinar. A dial-in teleconference number will be provided to those who register via 

email. Register at https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/982531953 .
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony J. Cafarelli, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ.
#### Irene K. Ward, Respondent, *v.*Kenneth Ward, Appellant.

Present — Heffernan, Brewster, Deyo, Santry and Bergan, JJ.
## In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 19

- 00056

- CV

JIMMY LEWIS SMITH, JR., D/B/A J&J TUBULAR, Appellant

V.

PRO

- TEST, INC., AND STEVE STIDHAM, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Gregg County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- 118

- CCL2

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Stevens2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION

The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal, representing that they have

fully and finally resolved any pending issues related to the judgment from which this appeal was

filed. Under the authority of Rule 42.1(a) of the Texas Rules of Appella te Procedure and in

keeping with the parties’ wishes, we grant the motion to dismiss. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(a).

We dismiss this appeal.

Scott E. Stevens

Justice

Date Submitted: September 23, 2019

Date Decided: September 24, 2019