alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| **Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) (Narrative) (Details) (USD $)In Millions, unless otherwise specified** | 3 Months Ended |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
||
| Loss recognition on unlocking actuarial assumptions related to payout annuity contracts                       | $ 115          |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
After-tax loss recognition on unlocking actuarial assumptions related to payout annuity contracts
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**cna_LossRecognitionOnUnlockingActuarialAssumptionsRelatedToPayoutAnnuityContracts**Namespace Prefix:**cna_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**debit**Period Type:**duration |
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Comparison of woodpreservatives in stake tests**
 
1983 | 2000 | 2011
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.79:FPL-RN
Item Number:0083-B-04
CGP systemNumber:000377604
 
February 10, 2020
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATIONS








I, Jason C. Behnke, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2019-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon, as indenture trustee of the issuing entity, and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as owner trustee of the issuing entity.





Date:  March 23, 2022


/s/ Jason C. BehnkeJason C. BehnkeVice President - Assistant TreasurerFord Motor Credit Company LLC, as Servicer(senior officer in charge of servicing function)
§ 2003.6 Information exempt from public inspection. ( a ) The Committee shall exempt from public inspection business information submitted by an interested party if the Committee determines that such information concerns or relates to trade secrets and commercial and financial information the disclosure of which is not authorized by the interested party furnishing such information and is not required by law.
( b ) A party requesting that the Committee exempt from public inspection business information submitted in writing shall clearly mark each page “Business Confidential” at the top.
( c ) The Committee may deny a request that it exempt from public inspection any particular business information if it determines that such information is not entitled to exemption under paragraph (a) of this section. In the event of such denial, the party submitting the particular business information will be notified of the reasons for the denial and will be permitted to withdraw his submission.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Inergy Holdings, L.P. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John J. Sherman, Chief Executive Officer of Inergy Holdings, L.P., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ John J. ShermanJohn J. ShermanChief Executive OfficerMay 8, 2008


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



38
#### § 930.82 Amended OCS plans.

If the State agency objects to the person's OCS plan consistency certification, and/or if, pursuant to subpart H of this part, the Secretary does not determine that each of the objected to federal license or permit activities described in detail in such plan is consistent with the objectives or purposes of the Act, or is necessary in the interest of national security, and if the person still intends to conduct the activities described in the OCS plan, the person shall submit an amended plan to the Secretary of the Interior or designee along with a consistency certification and data and information necessary to support the amended consistency certification. The data and information shall specifically describe modifications made to the original OCS plan, and the manner in which such modifications will ensure that all of the proposed federal license or permit activities described in detail in the amended plan will be conducted in a manner consistent with the management program. When satisfied that the person has met the requirements of the OCSLA and this subpart, the Secretary of the Interior or designee shall furnish the State agency with a copy of the amended OCS plan (excluding confidential and proprietary information), necessary data and information and consistency certification.

[71 FR 829, Jan. 5, 2006]
No: I-15-012 April 2, 2015 

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330

 Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331

NRC Finalizes Security-Related Inspection Finding for Millstone Nuclear Power Plant, 

Resulting in Additional Oversight

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will increase its level of oversight at the Millstone nuclear 

power plant following the finalization of a security-related inspection finding classified as “greater than 

green.” Dominion Nuclear Connecticut Inc. owns the plant, which has two operating reactors and is 

located in Waterford, Conn.

The NRC uses a color-coded assessment system for inspection findings and performance 

indicators, with colors ranging from green, for very low safety or security significance, to white, yellow 

or red, connoting high safety or security significance. In the case of security-related inspection findings 

or performance indicators, the NRC notifies the public when the “greater than green” threshold has 

been crossed. However, the agency does not provide specifics because of the sensitive nature of the 

information associated with such findings and indicators.

NRC inspectors identified the finding following a security baseline inspection at the Millstone 

plant concluded on Nov. 24, 2014. The finding was documented in an inspection report issued on 

Jan. 5. The NRC requested that Dominion take part in a regulatory conference with agency staff to 

provide additional information and perspectives regarding the finding. That closed conference was held 

at the NRC’s Region I Office on Feb. 17.

After considering the information presented by the company, and the information developed 

during the inspection, the NRC has determined the finding is appropriately characterized as “greater 

than green.”

“The NRC will have to determine the most appropriate response with respect to inspections and

follow-up reviews, based on the significance of the finding,” NRC Region I Administrator Dan Dorman 

said. “It should be noted that the security of the plant is not in question and, indeed, our inspectors 

checked that compensatory measures were implemented before leaving the site.”

The Millstone Unit 3 plant was already under additional NRC oversight after receiving a 

finalized white (low to moderate significance) inspection finding last year. That finding stemmed from 

problems that affected the plant’s turbine-driven auxiliary feedwater pump from May 2013 through 

February 2014.
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 20 (Wednesday, January 30, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 481-482]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00290]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIDDK RC2 Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: February 15, 2019.
    Time: 3:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Peter J. Kozel, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, 
Room 7009, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, 301-
594-4721, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bfd5dacdd4d6d1ccdeffd1d6dbdbd491d1d6d791d8d0c9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9bf1fee9f0f2f5e8fadbf5f2fffff0b5f5f2f3b5fcf4ed">[email protected]</span></a>.


[[Page 482]]


    This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in 
advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of 
December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 24, 2019.
Melanie Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-00290 Filed 1-29-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 1203.33 Certification testing. ( a ) *General.* Manufacturers, as defined in § 1203.32(b) to include importers, shall conduct a reasonable testing program to demonstrate that their bicycle helmets comply with the requirements of the standard.
( b ) *Reasonable testing program.* This paragraph provides guidance for establishing a reasonable testing program. ( 1 ) Within the requirements set forth in this paragraph (b), manufacturers and importers may define their own reasonable testing programs. Reasonable testing programs may, at the option of manufacturers and importers, be conducted by an independent third party qualified to perform such testing programs. However, manufacturers and importers are responsible for ensuring compliance with all requirements of the standard in subpart A of this part.
( 2 ) As part of the reasonable testing program, the bicycle helmets shall be divided into production lots, and sample bicycle helmets from each production lot shall be tested. Whenever there is a change in parts, suppliers of parts, or production methods, and the change could affect the ability of the bicycle helmet to comply with the requirements of the standard, the manufacturer shall establish a new production lot for testing.
( 3 ) The Commission will test for compliance with the standard by using the standard's test procedures. However, a reasonable testing program need not be identical to the tests prescribed in the standard.
( 4 ) If the reasonable testing program shows that a bicycle helmet may not comply with one or more requirements of the standard, no bicycle helmet in the production lot can be certified as complying until sufficient actions are taken that it is reasonably likely that no noncomplying bicycle helmets remain in the production lot. All identified noncomplying helmets in the lot must be destroyed or altered by repair, redesign, or use of a different material or component, to the extent necessary to make them conform to the standard.
( 5 ) The sale or offering for sale of a bicycle helmet that does not comply with the standard is a prohibited act and a violation of section 19(a) of the CPSA (15 U.S.C. 2068(a)), regardless of whether the bicycle helmet has been validly certified.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-10788 Conference Calendar

JOHN M. JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE; CLEMENTS INFIRMARY, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:95-CV-335

- - - - - - - - - - June 17, 1997 Before SMITH, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The motion filed by John M. Jones, Texas prisoner # 663342, to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal is GRANTED. Because Jones has had nothing in his prison trust-fund account for the relevant six-month period, no initial partial filing fee is assessed. Jones shall make monthly payments of twenty percent of the preceding month’s income credited to his account until theNo. 96-10788 - 2 - full filing fee is paid. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The agency having custody of Jones is directed to forward payments from his prisoner account to the clerk of the district court each time the amount in his account exceeds $10 until the filing fee of $105 is paid. See id. Regarding Jones’s challenge to the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit as frivolous, we have reviewed Jones’s brief and the record, and find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Jones’s claims of denial of due process and deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); Eason v. Thaler , 14 F.3d 8, 9 (5th Cir. 1994). Jones’s appeal is without arguable merit and is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). We caution Jones that future frivolous civil suits and appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. Jones is cautioned further to review any pending suits and appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous.
IFP GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
§ 1511.4 Protrusions. ( a ) *Protrusions limitation.* No protrusion from the face of the guard or shield opposite from the nipple shall exceed 0.63 inches (16mm) when measured in accordance with the procedure specified in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) *Protrusion test.* Secure the pacifier by clamping the nipple with its axis horizontal. For pacifiers with hinged handles or rings the orientation of the hinge axis shall be horizontal. A plane surface shall be applied to any protrusion from the guard or shield with a force gradually attaining but not exceeding 2.0 pounds (8.9 newtons) applied in a direction along the axis of the nipple. The normal of the plane surface shall be maintained parallel to the axis of the nipple. Any protrusion shall be allowed to flex or rotate about its hinge as the plane surfact is applied to it. Measure the distance from the plane surface to the guard or shield at the base of the nipple.
Exhibit 32.2

                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                           by Chief Financial Officer

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of VSB Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Raffaele M. Branca, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date: August 9, 2005

                                       /s/ RAFFAELE M. BRANCA
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Raffaele M. Branca
                                       Executive Vice President and CFO


A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       30
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40741 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus TRENT ANTHONY GUIDRY Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:97-CR-3-2

-------------------- December 11, 2002
Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Trent Anthony Guidry appeals from the denial of his motion for a reduced sentence for his cooperation. For the first time on appeal, he argues that this court should enforce a second agreement between himself and the government. Except for limited circumstances, this court has required presentation in the district court before it will hear a theory of recovery. See United States v. Garcia-Pillado , 898 F.2d 36, 39 (5th Cir. 1990). Because Guidry’s assertion of a second agreement presents a fact-No. 01-40741 -2- oriented and new theory of recovery, we decline to consider his argument. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the district court's decision.
MOTION TO FILE OUT-OF-TIME REPLY BRIEF GRANTED; AFFIRMED.
No: I-15-003 February 2, 2015

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330

 Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331 

NRC Initiates Special Inspection at Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has begun a Special Inspection at the Pilgrim nuclear 

power plant to review issues surrounding a storm-induced unplanned shutdown on Jan. 27. The singleunit boiling-water reactor is located in Plymouth, Mass., and is owned and operated by Entergy 

Nuclear. 

The six-member team, which will arrive on-site today, will be tasked with reviewing equipment 

issues that occurred during the shutdown, including the partial loss of off-site power; the failure of a

condensate pump motor associated with the plant’s High-Pressure Coolant Injection (HPCI) system; 

and the malfunctioning of one of the plant’s four safety relief valves.

Pilgrim, like other nuclear power plants, transmits power to the grid but also receives power 

back for operational purposes. During the recent major winter storm, one of two 345-kilovolt lines that 

provide off-site power to the plant tripped. In response, plant operators began reducing power. At about 

50-percent power, the second 345-kilovolt line also tripped, resulting in a reactor shutdown, or scram, 

at about 4 a.m. A third off-site power line, a 23-kilovolt line, remained available.

Operators started the plant’s two emergency diesel generators and transferred electrical loads 

for safety systems to those on-site power supplies due to concerns with off-site power. The transfer was 

performed by the operators prior to the loss of the off-site power lines.

“The Pilgrim reactor was safely shut down following the loss of two off-site power lines,” NRC 

Region I Administrator Dan Dorman said. “Nevertheless, we want to examine more closely the 

challenges that surfaced during the event, including safety system and equipment problems and the loss 

of the two off-site power lines.”

An inspection report documenting the team’s findings will be issued within 45 days after the 

completion of the review.
There was no Physical World map produced in 2010 by the CIA.