alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Board of Scientific Counselors, NIAMS.

The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, including consideration of personnel qualifications and performance, and the competence of individual investigators, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Board of Scientific Counselors, NIAMS.                    

*Date:*                         December 16-17, 2004.                    

*Time:*                         6:30 p.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate personal qualifications and performance, and competence of individual investigators.                    

*Place:*                         Holiday Inn Select Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Peter E. Lipsky, MD, Scientific Director, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, Bldg. 10; Room 9N228, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-2612.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 18, 2004.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. 04-26246  Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
|         |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| • | the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|         |                                                                                                                                                      |
|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| • | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |
| Dated: | August 4, 2014 | By   | /s/ Thomas F. Motamed   |   |
|   |   |   | Thomas F. Motamed  |   |
|   |   |   | Chief Executive Officer  |   |
Exhibit 32.1 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 

I, Michael D. Durham, as President and Chief Executive Officer of ADA-ES, Inc. (the “Company”), certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany. 

/s/ Michael D. Durham 

Name: Michael D.Durham 

Title: President and Chief Executive Officer 

Date:May 7, 2008
[Cite as State v. Sapp, 2019-Ohio-589.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO 

BUTLER COUNTY 

STATE OF OHIO, : 

 Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2018-04-069 

 : D E C I S I O N 

 - vs - 2/19/2019 

 : 

BRYAN R. SAPP a.k.a. BRIAN SAPP 

 : 

 Appellant : 

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 

Case No. CR2017-08-1361 

Michael T. Gmoser, Prosecuting Attorney, John C. Heinkel, Government Service Center, 

315 High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for appellee 

Michelle Temmel, 6 South Second Street, Suite 305, Hamilton, Ohio, 45011, for 

appellant 

 Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by 

appellant, Bryan R. Sapp a.k.a. Brian Sapp, the transcript of the docket and journal 

entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Butler County Court of 

Common Pleas, and upon a brief filed by appellant's counsel. 

{¶ 2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review 

of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court 
______________________ 

- 2 - 

prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be 

predicated; (2) lists one potential error "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders 

at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to 

determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without 

infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as 

counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies 

that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. 

{¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response 

having been received we have accordingly examined the record and find no error 

prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of 

counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is 

dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous. 

 S. POWELL, P.J., PIPER and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: F AA- 2012 - 1311 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM204AD
84 - 27 - 55 --- 6/15/11 MSP 8Q113007, RC --- 6/2/11 MSP 4 - 110372, RD --- 6/2/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
**Exhibit
      32.2**





Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)





I,
      Michael A. Reisner, Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
      Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of ICON Capital Corp.,
      the
      Manager of the Registrant in connection with the Quarterly Report of ICON Income
      Fund Ten, LLC (the "LLC") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007,
      as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Quarterly Report") certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





1.  The
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m); and





2.  The
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      LLC.








Dated: *May
      15, 2007*





*/s/
      Michael A. Reisner*


Michael
      A. Reisner


Director,
      Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)
### Part E—Contractor Employee Compensation
#### § 904.100 General.

This subpart sets forth the procedures governing NOAA administrative proceedings for the assessment of civil penalties under the statutes cited in § 904.1(c).
```

[House Hearing, 107 Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

 
THE ENRON COLLAPSE AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR WORKER RETIREMENT SECURITY
=======================================================================

                                HEARINGS

                               before the

                COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND THE WORKFORCE
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                      ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH CONGRESS

                             SECOND SESSION

                               __________

            HEARING HELD IN WASHINGTON, DC, FEBRUARY 7, 2002

                               __________

                           Serial No. 107-42

                               __________

  Printed for the use of the Committee on Education and the Workforce

                        U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
81-198                         WASHINGTON : 2002
_____________________________________________________________________________
For Sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office
Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov  Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; (202) 512-1800 
Fax: (202) 512-2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-0001


```
FIDELITY CAPITAL CONCEPTS LIMITED

A Nevada Corporation



CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Fidelity Capital Concepts Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), we, Ronald Nelson Baird, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Robert A. Morrison IV, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









Dated January 5, 2005

/s/Ronald Nelson Baird



Ronald Nelson Baird,

President and Chief Executive Officer





/s/Robert A. Morrison IV



Robert A. Morrison IV,

Chief Financial Officer
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 12-3187

___________________________

Roschell H. Brooke

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration 1

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Arkansas - Harrison

____________

 Submitted: May 20, 2013

Filed: May 22, 2013

[Unpublished]

____________

Before BYE, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Carolyn W. Colvin has been appointed to serve as acting Commissioner of 1

Social Security, and is substituted as appellee pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate

Procedure 43(c).
Roschell H. Brooke appeals the district court’s order affirming the denial of 2

supplemental security income. Upon de novo review of the record, we conclude that

the findings of the administrative law judge (ALJ) are supported by substantial

evidence in the record as a whole, including new and material evidence the Appeals

Council considered in declining review. See O’Donnell v. Barnhart, 318 F.3d 811,

816 (8th Cir. 2003). We find no merit to Brooke’s arguments concerning the ALJ’s

failure to explain why she did not meet a listing, see Boettcher v. Astrue, 652 F.3d

860, 863 (8th Cir. 2011) (when ALJ fails to explain why impairment does not meet

or equal one of listed impairments, it is not error if conclusion issupported by overall

record); the ALJ’s failure to develop the record on her back pain, see Mouser v.

Astrue, 545 F.3d 634, 639 (8th Cir. 2008) (ALJ is not obligated to investigate claim

not presented in application or offered at hearing as basis for disability); Ellis v.

Barnhart, 392 F.3d 988, 994 (8th Cir. 2005) (reversal for failure to develop record is

warranted only where such failure is unfair or prejudicial); orthe ALJ’s determination

asto her residual functional capacity (RFC), see Perks v. Astrue, 687 F.3d 1086, 1092

(8th Cir. 2012) (medical records, physician observations, and claimant’s subjective

statements about capabilities may be used to support RFC; RFC must be supported

by some medical evidence, but burden of persuasion to prove disability and show

RFC remains on claimant). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

affirmed.

______________________________

The Honorable JamesR. Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the

2

Western District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by

consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

-2-
CMP-2 

Revised: May 3, 2004

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District 

Supplemental Application Form 

Conservation Management Practices: CITRUS 

Farm Name: CMP Plan Years: to 

Crop Acreage: 

Land 

Preparation/ 

Cultivation 

Select at least one of the following CMPs. 

Note: 100% of the total crop acreage must be covered by the selected CMPs. 

 Chemigation/Fertigation, ac Multiple CMPs in Another Category 

 Conservation Irrigation, ac Non-Tillage/Chemical Tillage, ac 

 Equipment Change/Tech. Improvements, ac Other (approved on a case-by-case basis), ac 

Please describe the specifics of the practice(s) chosen above: 

 

 

 

Harvest 

Select at least one of the following CMPs. 

Note: 100% of the total crop acreage must be covered by the selected CMPs. 

 Hand Harvesting, ac Other (approved on a case-by-case basis), ac 

 Multiple CMPs in Another Category 

Please describe the specifics of the practice(s) chosen above: 

 

 

 

Other 

Select at least one of the following CMPs. 

Note: 100% of the total crop acreage must be covered by the selected CMPs. 

 Bulk Materials Control Night Farming, ac 

 Conservation Irrigation, ac No Burning, ac 

 Cover Crops, ac Organic Practices, ac 

 Grinding/Chipping/Shredding, ac Permanent Crop, ac 

 Integrated Pest Management (IPM), ac Soil Amendments, ac 

 Irrigation Power Units Surface Roughening, ac 

 Multiple CMPs in Another Category Other (approved on a case-by-case basis), ac 

Please describe the specifics of the practice(s) chosen above: 

 

 

 

CMP

2
Exhibit 32.1

I, Richard J. DeVries, President and
Chief Executive Officer of Pavilion Bancorp, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 which
          this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
          December 31, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
          condition and results of operations of Pavilion Bancorp, Inc.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 20, 2006

| |  | /s/ Richard J. DeVries
Richard J. DeVriesPresident and Chief Executive Officer
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
§ 946.9 Certification of restructuring. ( a ) The Secretary shall publish each proposed certification in the Federal Register at least 60 days prior to certification. If, after consideration of the public comments received, the Secretary agrees that the proposed restructuring will not result in any degradation of service to the service area, he or she shall so certify by submitting a certification report to Congress. Upon transmittal of the certification by the secretary, NWS shall promptly publish the certification in the Federal Register stating where copies of the certification and the accompanying documents may be obtained.
( b ) The Responsible Meteorologist may restructure only after the certification has been submitted to Congress.
( c ) Any field office for which restructuring has been certified under this section shall also be subject to additional certification if that office is closed during stage 2 of the modernization. No field office will close before January 1, 1996.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

TY SCHULZE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D19-2612 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed September 30, 2020. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Neil A. Roddenbery, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Carly J. Robbins-Gilbert, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ty Schulze, pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MORRIS, LUCAS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
#### § 1301.8 Effective date.

The effective date of this ban shall be June 13, 1978.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-83,925-01

EX PARTE JOSEPH WEBER, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. D-1-DC-13-904090-A IN THE 331ST DISTRICT COURT

FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two counts of

“super” aggravated sexual assault of a child, one count of continuous sexual abuse of a child, and

two counts of indecency with a child. He was sentenced to imprisonment for three terms of seventy

years and two terms of ten years. 

Applicant contends that trial counsel failed to file a notice of appeal. We remanded this

application to the trial court for findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial court made
2

findings and conclusions and recommended that we grant relief.

We agree and conclude that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a notice of appeal. 

Ex parte Axel, 757 S.W.2d 369, 374 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988); Jones v. State, 98 S.W.3d 700, 703

(Tex. Crim. App. 2003). Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the

judgments of conviction in cause number D-1-DC-13-904090-A from the 331st District Court of

Travis County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may give a written notice of

appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. Within ten days of

the issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If

Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall immediately

appoint an attorney to represent Applicant on direct appeal. All time limits shall be calculated as if

the sentence had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that,

should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to file a written notice

of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division. 

Delivered: April 27, 2016

Do not publish
No: 14-029 April 25, 2014

CONTACT: Maureen Conley, 301-415-8200 

NRC Issues License to Strata for Ross 

Uranium Recovery Facility in Wyoming

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued an operating license to Strata Energy Inc. for 

the Ross uranium recovery facility in Crook County, Wyoming. 

Strata submitted the application for the in situ recovery facility in January 2011. The license is 

the fifth issued by the NRC for a uranium recovery facility since 1998.

The NRC’s review of the application included an environmental review published in February 

as a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), which referenced the agency’s Generic EIS 

for in situ recovery facilities.

The NRC’s review also included a Safety Evaluation Report, which concluded the proposed 

facility can operate safely, including management of radiological and chemical hazards, groundwater 

protection, and eventual cleanup and decommissioning. An NRC Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 

will hold a hearing to examine environmental contentions related to the project later this year.

The Ross EIS, NUREG-1910 Supplement 5, is available on the NRC website. The Safety 

Evaluation Report, the license and more information on the Ross application are also available.