alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC PROPOSES $17,500 CIVIL PENALTY FOR

GLOBAL NUCLEAR FUEL – AMERICAS LLC IN WILMINGTON

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has proposed a $17,500 civil penalty against Global 

Nuclear Fuel – Americas LLC in Wilmington, N.C., for violations of NRC requirements related to a 

March incident at the fuel manufacturing facility.

The violations involved a failure of Global Nuclear Fuel’s staff to maintain mass control of 

uranium oxide in particulate air filters in one area of the facility. On March 2, Global Nuclear Fuel 

advised the NRC that its staff had identified that an excessive amount of uranium oxide powder has 

been present in the filter housing. There was no actual criticality, though the quantity of material 

could have posed a criticality threat if other safety features had not been in place.

A criticality can occur when nuclear materials come together in sufficient quantity or in a 

container of correct shape to initiate a chain reaction resulting in either a “burst” or a sustained 

release of radiation. A small criticality event would not be expected to affect people or the 

environment outside the facility, but could be serious for workers in the immediate area.

An NRC Special Inspection Team identified the violations associated with the failure to 

maintain mass control. At a Sept. 29 predecisional enforcement conference, Global Nuclear Fuel 

officials acknowledged the violations and presented details of corrective actions to prevent a 

recurrence of the event.

The NRC proposed a $17,500 civil penalty for the violations partly because the company 

has been the subject of escalated enforcement within the past two years. The company has 30 days 

to either pay the civil penalty or protest its imposition.

A copy of the notice of violation is available on the NRC website in ADAMS using the 

reference number ML11318A219. In addition, the inspection reports documenting the violations are 

also available online.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES link 

on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to 

NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No: II-11-066

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416 

 November 15, 2011 

E-mail: OPA2.Resource@nrc.gov
#### Emil Wolff, Respondent, v Ionian Construction, Inc., et al., Appellants.

[819 NYS2d 482]

In an action to recover on certain promissory notes, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, Jr., J.), dated March 7, 2005, which denied their motion, inter alia, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and for summary judgment on their counterclaim for a judgment declaring that their aggregate indebtedness to the plaintiff was reduced to the sum of $100,000.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The alleged indebtedness at issue involves two promissory notes, one for the principal sum of $300,000 and one for the principal sum of $100,000, executed by the defendants and payable to Henry Hammerschlag, the plaintiffs decedent. In support of their motion, the defendants submitted a letter dated April 9, 1999, which the plaintiff stipulated constituted a letter signed by the decedent, in which the decedent stated that “the debt owed to me by the Hatgistavrou family is reduced to $100,000” payable in “$2,500 increments, without interest.” While the letter satisfied the requirements of General Obligations Law § 5-1103 since it was in writing and “signed by the *467party against whom it is sought to enforce the change,” it is ambiguous as to whether it refers to the defendants’ entire debt, to the $100,000 promissory note, or to the $300,000 promissory note. Further, there are questions concerning the circumstances under which the letter was signed. Accordingly, the defendants did not establish their prima facie entitlement to summary judgment. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Lunn, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                  AND TREASURER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB of HiEnergy  Technologies,
Inc. (the  "Company") for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Bogdan
C.  Maglich,  Chief  Executive  Officer and  Treasurer  of the  Company,  hereby
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ B. C. Maglich
-----------------------------------
Bogdan C. Maglich
Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer

December 22, 2003

This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


                                       82
### §12614. Summer national service program

#### (a) In general

Under the summer national service program of the National Civilian Community Corps Program authorized by section 12612(a) of this title, a diverse group of youth aged 14 through 18 years who are from urban or rural areas shall work in teams on National Civilian Community Corps projects.

#### (b) Necessary participants

To the extent practicable, at least 50 percent of the participants in the summer national service program shall be from economically and ethnically diverse backgrounds, including youth who are in foster care.

#### (c) Seasonal program

The training and service of Corps members under the summer national service program in each year shall be conducted after April 30 and before October 1 of that year.

(Pub. L. 101–610, title I, §154, formerly §195C, as added Pub. L. 102–484, div. A, title X, §1092(a)(1), Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2524; renumbered §154 and amended Pub. L. 103–82, title I, §104(b), (e)(2)(B), Sept. 21, 1993, 107 Stat. 840, 847; Pub. L. 111–13, title I, §1504, Apr. 21, 2009, 123 Stat. 1522.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 12653c of this title prior to renumbering by Pub. L. 103–82, §104(b).

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 12614, Pub. L. 101–610, title I, §163, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3158; Pub. L. 102–384, §7(b), Oct. 5, 1992, 106 Stat. 1456, related to higher education benefits for those selected for Peace Corps or VISTA demonstration programs, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–82, §104(a).

#### Amendments

2009—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 111–13, §1504(1), substituted "National Civilian Community Corps Program" for "Civilian Community Corps Demonstration Program" and "on National Civilian Community Corps" for "on Civilian Community Corps".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 111–13, §1504(2), substituted "shall be from economically and ethnically diverse backgrounds, including youth who are in foster care." for "shall be economically disadvantaged youths."

1993—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–82, §104(e)(2)(B), substituted "section 12612(a)" for "section 12653a(a)".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2009 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–13 effective Oct. 1, 2009, see section 6101(a) of Pub. L. 111–13, set out as a note under section 4950 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1993 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–82 effective Oct. 1, 1993, see section 123 of Pub. L. 103–82, set out as a note under section 1701 of Title 16, Conservation.
§ 1303.4 Banned hazardous products. The following consumer products, manufactured after February 27, 1978, unless exempted by § 1303.3, are banned hazardous products (see definitions in § 1303.2): ( a ) Paint and other similar surface-coating materials which are “lead-containing paint.”
( b ) Toys and other articles intended for use by children that bear “lead-containing paint.”
( c ) Furniture articles that bear “lead-containing paint.”
|  My                         Cart                           |  HUD                         Home  |  HUD                         USER Home  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
1998 Board of Directors Compesation Plan



 Exhibit 10.26 
 WASTE INDUSTRIES USA, INC. 
 1998 BOARD OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PLAN 
 For fiscal years 1998 through 2003, the non-employee directors of Waste Industries USA, Inc. received an annual retainer fee in cash or shares of Waste
Industries common stock equal in value to $5,000, plus $500 in cash or stock, all at the option of the individual director, for attending each meeting of the Board of Directors and each Board of Directors’ committee meeting. For fiscal years
2004 and 2005, the retainer was increased to $15,000 and the per meeting fee was increased to $1,000 unless attendance was by telephone for which a fee of $500 was paid. In fiscal 2006, the per meeting fee was increased to $1,200, with $600 for
attendance by telephone. Beginning in fiscal 2002, the chairman of the Audit Committee received an annual fee of $20,000, which was in addition to his regular director fees, and was reimbursed for his out-of-pocket expenses in performing his duties
for the Committee. 
 In addition, beginning in fiscal year 2002, the non-employee directors of Waste Industries received options to purchase
shares of Waste Industries common stock in an amount equal to $7,000 per year. The actual number of options was calculated as of year-end by using the Black-Scholes method of valuation. The exercise price of the options was the fair market value on
the date of grant. Directors had to serve until the end of the calendar year to receive the grant of options.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 24-11516

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

TERRENCE EUGENE SMITH, SR., 

PAMELA KATHLEEN ASHE-SMITH, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

WAFFLE HOUSE, INC., 

c/o Gregory Newman, 

Defendant-Appellee.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

USCA11 Case: 24-11516 Document: 11-1 Date Filed: 07/01/2024 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 24-11516

D.C. Docket No. 1:23-cv-02136-SDG

____________________

Before ROSENBAUM, LUCK, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction. The 30-day statutory time limit required Terrence Smith, Sr., 

and Pamela Ashe-Smith (“the Smiths”) to file a notice of appeal 

from the district court’s April 1, 2024 final judgment on or before 

May 1, 2024. See 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). 

However, the Smiths did not file a notice of appeal until May 6, 

2024. 

Further, there is no basis in the record for relief under Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5) or 4(a)(6). See Fed. R. 

App. P. 4(a)(5) (providing that a party may move to extend the time 

for filing a notice of appeal within 30 days of expiration of the appeal period), 4(a)(6) (providing that the court may reopen the time 

to file an appeal for a period of 14 days where a party does not receive notice of the entry of the judgment within 21 days of its entry

and other requirements are met). Accordingly, the notice of appeal 

is untimely and cannot invoke our appellate jurisdiction. See Hamer 

v. Neighborhood Hous. Servs. of Chi., 138 S. Ct. 13, 21 (2017). 

No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies 

with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all 

other applicable rules. 

USCA11 Case: 24-11516 Document: 11-1 Date Filed: 07/01/2024 Page: 2 of 2
§ 1025.44 Expert witnesses. ( a ) *Definition.* An expert witness is one who, by reason of education, training, experience, or profession, has peculiar knowledge concerning the subject matter to which his/her testimony relates and from which he/she may draw inferences based upon hypothetically stated facts or offer opinions from facts involving scientific or technical knowledge.
( b ) *Method of presenting testimony of expert witness.* Except as may otherwise be ordered by the Presiding Officer, the direct testimony of an expert witness shall be in writing and shall be filed on the record and exchanged between the parties no later than ten (10) days preceding the commencement of the hearing. The written testimony of an expert witness shall be incorporated into the record and shall constitute the direct testimony of that witness. Upon a showing of good cause, the party sponsoring the expert witness may be permitted to amplify the written direct testimony during the hearing.
( c ) *Cross-examination and redirect examination of expert witness.* Cross-examination, redirect examination, and re-cross-examination of an expert witness shall proceed in due course based upon the written testimony and any amplifying oral testimony.
( d ) *Failure to file or exchange written testimony.* Failure to file or exchange written testimony of expert witnesses as provided in this section shall deprive the sponsoring party of the use of the expert witness and of the conclusions which that witness would have presented, unless the opposing parties consent or the Presiding Officer otherwise orders in unusual circumstances.
No: IV-14-015 June 30, 2014

CONTACT: Victor Dricks 817-200-1128

Lara Uselding 817-200-1519

NRC Names New Resident Inspector at Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has selected David You as the 

new Resident Inspector at the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station. The 

plant is located in Wintersburg, Ariz.

“David You’s technical experience will assist the NRC in carrying out 

its mission to protect people and the environment by ensuring the safe 

operation of Palo Verde,” said NRC Region IV Administrator Marc Dapas.

You joined the NRC’s Region IV office in Arlington, Texas, in 2011. He worked as a project 

engineer in the Division of Reactor Projects. Prior to joining the NRC, he served in the U.S. Navy’s 

submarine force aboard the USS San Francisco. He holds a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering 

from the University of Arizona.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two Resident Inspectors. You joins 

Senior Resident Inspector Tony Brown and Resident Inspector Dustin Reinert. They serve as the 

agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring significant work projects, and 

interacting with plant workers and the public.

The Palo Verde Resident Inspectors can be reached at 623-386-3638.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Mark H. McKinnies, as Chief Financial Officer of ADA-Es, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) Amendment No. 1 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Mark H. McKinnies
|Name:                 |  | Mark H. McKinnies      
|Title:                |  | Chief Financial Officer

Date: October 19, 2012
### §10151. Findings and purposes

(a) The Congress finds that—

(1) the persons owning and operating civilian nuclear power reactors have the primary responsibility for providing interim storage of spent nuclear fuel from such reactors, by maximizing, to the extent practical, the effective use of existing storage facilities at the site of each civilian nuclear power reactor, and by adding new onsite storage capacity in a timely manner where practical;

(2) the Federal Government has the responsibility to encourage and expedite the effective use of existing storage facilities and the addition of needed new storage capacity at the site of each civilian nuclear power reactor; and

(3) the Federal Government has the responsibility to provide, in accordance with the provisions of this part, not more than 1,900 metric tons of capacity for interim storage of spent nuclear fuel for civilian nuclear power reactors that cannot reasonably provide adequate storage capacity at the sites of such reactors when needed to assure the continued, orderly operation of such reactors.

(b) The purposes of this part are—

(1) to provide for the utilization of available spent nuclear fuel pools at the site of each civilian nuclear power reactor to the extent practical and the addition of new spent nuclear fuel storage capacity where practical at the site of such reactor; and

(2) to provide, in accordance with the provisions of this part, for the establishment of a federally owned and operated system for the interim storage of spent nuclear fuel at one or more facilities owned by the Federal Government with not more than 1,900 metric tons of capacity to prevent disruptions in the orderly operation of any civilian nuclear power reactor that cannot reasonably provide adequate spent nuclear fuel storage capacity at the site of such reactor when needed.

(Pub. L. 97–425, title I, §131, Jan. 7, 1983, 96 Stat. 2229.)
No: 13-105 December 17, 2013

CONTACT: Maureen Conley, 301-415-8200 

NRC Meets Performance Goals;

Issues FY 2013 Performance and Accountability Report

Nuclear reactor and materials licensees maintained their excellent safety record during fiscal 

year 2013, according to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Performance and Accountability Report 

for Fiscal Year 2013, issued today. The report describes the agency’s program and financial 

performance from Oct. 1, 2012, through Sept. 30, 2013. It reflects the agency’s achievement of both its 

safety and security strategic goals, and all its performance measures. 

The NRC improved its operations by continuing to invest in its skilled workforce of engineers 

and scientists through knowledge transfer programs, recruiting a diverse workforce and providing 

training opportunities. The report also points out the agency’s sound financial position, despite 

government-wide budgeting uncertainties over the past fiscal year. For the 10th consecutive year, an 

independent auditor found no material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in the agency’s financial 

statements. The NRC is in full compliance with laws governing federal spending.

“I continue to be impressed by the NRC staff’s commitment to achieving the agency’s safety 

and security goals,” said Chairman Allison Macfarlane. “Our ability to navigate the uncertainties of

sequestration and the recent government shutdown reflects our employees’ skill and dexterity. The 

NRC remains committed to efficient management of resources.” 

A copy of the full report can be found on the NRC’s website.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 06671**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 06671\06671_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 06671\06671_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 06671\06671_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 06671\06671_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06671\06671_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06671\06671_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06671\06671_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06671\06671_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06671\06671_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 06671\Certification Statement_06671.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 06671\Supporting Documentation\06671_EPA Survey - Submittal Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 06671\Supporting Documentation\06671_PJ SPDES Water Flow diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 06671\Supporting Documentation\06671_PJ Waste Water Treatment Diagram - WWT-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 228 (Monday, November 29, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 69378]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26257]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Office of the Director, National institutes of Health; Amended 
Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting the Recombinant 
DNA Advisory Committee, December 16, 2004, 8:30 a.m. to December 17, 
2004, 6 p.m. Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, MD 
20814 which was published in the Federal Register on November 18, 2004, 
69 FR 67597.
    The meeting of the Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee has been 
changed to a one-day meeting on December 16, 2004, from 8:30 a.m. to 
4:45 p.m. The meeting is open to the public.

    Dated: November 19, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-26257 Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
----

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/      Chang H. Ahn        |   |
|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|   | Chang      H. Ahn            |   |
|   | Chief      Executive Officer |   |
|   |                         |   |
|   |                         |   |
|   | /s/ Ted T.H. Jeong           |   |
|   | Ted      T.H. Jeong          |   |
|   | Chief      Financial Officer |   |

----
### Part B—Improving Coordination of Federal and State Programs