alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1018.2 Definitions. ( a ) Advisory Committee Act or Act means the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C. App. I (1974)).
( b ) *OMB Circular No. A-63* means Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A-63 (Rev.), entitled “Advisory Committee Management” (39 FR 12369, April 5, 1974), as amended.
( c ) *Advisory Committee* means any committee, board, commission, council, conference, panel, task force or other similar group, or any subcommittee or other subgroup, thereof, which is established or used by the Commission in the interest of obtaining advice or recommendations and which is not composed wholly of full-time officers or employees of the Federal Government.
( d ) *Statutory advisory committee* means an advisory committee established or directed to be established by Congress.
( e ) *Non-statutory advisory committee* means an advisory committee established by the Commission, including a committee which was authorized, but not established by Congress.
( f ) *Ad hoc advisory committee* means a non-continuing, non-statutory advisory committee established by the Commission for the stated purpose of providing advice or recommendations regarding a particular problem which must be resolved immediately or within a limited period of time.
( g ) *Non-Commission established advisory committee* means an advisory committee established by a Federal, State, or local instrumentality other than the Commission, or by a private organization or group and utilized by the Commission for advisory services.
( h ) *GSA Secretariat* means the Committee Management Secretariat of the General Services Administration.
( i ) *Chairman* means the Chairman of the Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[41 FR 45882, Oct. 18, 1976, as amended at 46 FR 63248, Dec. 31, 1981]
§ 1500.265 Imports; definitions. For the purposes of the regulations prescribed under section 14 of the act: ( a ) The term *owner or consignee* means the person who has the rights of a consignee under the provisions of the Tariff Act of 1930 (secs. 483, 484, 485, 46 Stat. 721 as amended; 19 U.S.C. 1483, 1484, 1485).
( b ) The term *area office director* means the director of the area office of the Consumer Product Safety Commission having jurisdiction over the port of entry through which a hazardous substance is imported or offered for import, or such officer of the area office as he may designate to act in his behalf in administering and enforcing the provisions of section 14 of the act.
§ 1210.14 Qualification testing. ( a ) *Testing.* Before any manufacturer or importer of lighters distributes lighters in commerce in the United States, surrogate lighters of each model shall be tested in accordance with § 1210.4, above, to ensure that all such lighters comply with the standard. However, if a manufacturer has tested one model of lighter, and then wishes to distribute another model of lighter that differs from the first model only by differences that would not have an *adverse* effect on child resistance, the second model need not be tested in accordance with § 1210.4.
( b ) *Product modifications.* If any changes are made to a product after initial qualification testing that could adversely affect the ability of the product to meet the requirements of the standard, additional qualification tests must be made on surrogates for the changed product before the changed lighters are distributed in commerce.
( c ) *Requalification.* If a manufacturer or importer chooses to requalify a lighter design after it has been in production, this may be done by following the testing procedures at § 1210.4.
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, J. Leonard Ivins, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Edgeline Holdings,
Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such  Form 10-Q
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Oncolin Therapeutics, Inc.





Date:  February
13, 2009











By:  /s/ J. Leonard
Ivins


J.
Leonard Ivins


Chief
Executive Officer
* The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-3760

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District v. * of Minnesota. * Angel Lomas-Flores, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: May 18, 2001 Filed: May 24, 2001

___________ Before LOKEN, ROSS, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Angel Lomas-Flores pleaded guilty to illegally reentering the United States after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Generally, the statutory maximum sent ence for this offense is two years. See id. If the alien was deported following a convictionfor an aggravated felony, however, the statutory maximum sentence is twenty years. See id. § 1326(b)(2). Because Lomas-Flores had been deported after his convictionfor an aggravated felony, the district court * sentenced him to seventy months-2-

in prison. Relying on Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), Lomas-Flores contends his felony conviction must be charged in the indictment because the convict ion increases the statutory maximum penalty from two to twenty years. This contention is foreclosed by our decision in UnitedStates v. Raya-Ramirez , No. 00- 3839, 2001 WL 300563, at *1 (8th Cir. Mar. 29, 2001). In Raya-Ramirez , we held Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 226 (1998) (§ 1326(b)(2) enhancement properly applied to defendant who pleaded guilty to violating § 1326(a), even though the indictment did not allege the defendant's earlier aggravatedfelony convictions or mention§ 1326(b)(2)). The district court thus properly applied the enhancement in Lomas-Flores's case, and we affirm his sentence. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### Sound Transportation Company, Respondent, v. The Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. So opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
§ 581.402 Maximum garnishment limitations. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, pursuant to section 1673(b)(2) (A) and (B) of title 15 of the United States Code (the Consumer Credit Protection Act, as amended), unless a lower maximum garnishment limitation is provided by applicable State or local law, the maximum part of the aggregate disposable earnings subject to garnishment to enforce any support order(s) shall not exceed: ( 1 ) Fifty percent of the obligor's aggregate disposable earnings for any workweek, where the obligor asserts by affidavit, or by other acceptable evidence, that he or she is supporting a spouse, a dependent child, or both, other than the former spouse, child, or both, for whose support such order is issued, except that an additional five percent will apply if it appears on the face of the legal process, or from other evidence submitted in accordance with § 581.202(d), that such earnings are to enforce a support order for a period which is 12 weeks prior to that workweek. An obligor shall be considered to be supporting a spouse, dependent child, or both, only if the obligor provides over half of the support for a spouse, dependent child or both.
( 2 ) Sixty percent of the obligor's aggregate disposable earnings for any workweek, where the obligor fails to assert by affidavit or establishes by other acceptable evidence, that he or she is supporting a spouse, dependent child, or both, other than a former spouse, child, or both, with respect to whose support such order is issued, except that an additional five percent will apply if it appears on the face of the legal process, or from other evidence submitted in accordance with § 581.202(d), that such earnings are to enforce a support order for a period which is 12 weeks prior to that workweek.
( 3 ) Where, under § 581.302(a)(2), an obligor submits evidence that he or she is supporting a second spouse, child, or both a second spouse and dependent child, copies of the evidence shall be sent by the governmental entity to the garnishor, or the garnishor's representative, as well as to the court, or other authority as specified in § 581.102(f)(1), together with notification that the obligor's support claim will be honored. If the garnishor disagrees with the obligor's support claim, the garnishor should immediately refer the matter to the court, or other authority, for resolution.
( b ) In instances where an obligor is receiving remuneration from more than one governmental entity, an authority described in § 581.102(f)(1) may apply the limitations described in paragraph (a) of this section to the total remuneration, *i.e.,* to the combined aggregate disposable earnings received by the obligor.
[63 FR 14759, Mar. 26, 1998]
### SUBCHAPTER II—EMISSION STANDARDS FOR MOVING SOURCES
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 5, 2018

t1128 

# Order

Clerk December 5, 2018

157645

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 157645

COA: 335393

Wayne CC: 16

- 003466

- FH

SHAYLA DENEICE TUCKER,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 13, 2018

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 111 (Tuesday, June 10, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33189-33190]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-13424]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK

[Public Notice 2014-3007]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals Submissions, 
and Approvals

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the United States.

ACTION: Submission for OMB review and comments request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Form Title: EIB 92-79 Broker Registration Form.

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank), as a 
part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent 
burden, invites the general public and other Federal Agencies to 
comment on the proposed information collection, as required by the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Our customers will be able to submit 
this form on paper or electronically. This form is used by insurance 
brokers to register with Export-Import Bank. It provides Export-Import 
Bank staff with the information necessary to make a determination of 
the eligibility of the broker to receive commission payments under 
Export-Import Bank's credit insurance programs.
    Form can be viewed at http://www.exim.gov/pub/pending/eib92-79.pdf.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 10, 2014 to be 
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically on 
WWW.REGULATIONS.GOV (EIB 92-79) or by mail to Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20038 Attn: OMB 
3048-0024

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Title and Form Number: EIB 92-79 Broker Registration Form
    OMB Number: 3048-0024.
    Type of Review: Regular.
    Need and Use: This form is used by insurance brokers to register 
with Export Import Bank. The form provides Export Import Bank staff 
with the information necessary to make a determination of the 
eligibility of the broker to receive commission payments under Export 
Import Bank's credit insurance programs.

[[Page 33190]]

    Affected Public: This form affects entities engaged in brokering 
export credit insurance policies.
    Annual Number of Respondents: 17.
    Estimated Time per Respondent: 15 minutes.
    Government Review Time per Response: 2 hours.
    Frequency of Reporting or Use: Once every three years.
    Government Reviewing Time per Year: 34 hours.
    Average Wages per Hour: $42.50.
    Average Cost per Year: $1,445.
    Benefits and Overhead: 20%.
    Total Government Cost: $1,734.

Bonita Jones,
Agency Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-13424 Filed 6-9-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/Richard W. McCullough                           |   | May 10, 2011 |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------|
|  Richard W. McCullough                        |   |         |
| Chief Executive Officer                            |   |         |
| Petroleum Development Corporation (dba PDC Energy) |   |         |
| Managing General Partner                           |   |         |
|                                               |   |         |
|                                               |   |         |
| /s/Gysle R. Shellum                                |   | May 10, 2011 |
| Gysle R. Shellum                                   |   |         |
| Chief Financial Officer                            |   |         |
| Petroleum Development Corporation (dba PDC Energy) |   |         |
| Managing General Partner                           |   |         |

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6432

DALE A. FOSTER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-97-685-R) Submitted: July 30, 1998 Decided: August 26, 1998 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dale A. Foster, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Dale A. Foster seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his challenge to his participation in the “Therapeutic Community,” and denying relief on the remainder of his claims filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and findno reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Foster v. Angelone , No. CA-97-685-R (E.D. Va. Feb. 11, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 2012.2 Definitions. Unless the context otherwise requires, for the purpose of this subpart, the following terms shall have the meanings assigned below. ( a ) *Beef* means any article classified under any of the subheadings of the HTS specified in additional U.S. note 3 to chapter 2 of the HTS.
( b ) *Allocated country* means a country to which an allocation of a particular quantity of beef has been assigned under additional U.S. note 3 to chapter 2 of the HTS.
( c ) *Enter* means to enter, or withdraw from warehouse, for consumption.
( d ) *HTS* means the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States.
( e ) *Participating country* means any allocated country that USTR has determined is, and notified the U.S. Customs Service as being eligible to use export certificates.
( f ) *USTR* means the United States Trade Representative or the designee of the United States Trade Representative.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of the Florida Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 8:30 a.m. and adjourn at 1:30 p.m. on December 10, 2004, at the Inter-Continental Hotel, 100 Chopin Plaza, Miami, FL 33131. The purpose of the meeting is to determine what Civil Rights issues will be reviewed as a project. 

Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation to the Committee, should contact Ivy Davis, Chief of the Regional Programs Coordination Unit, (202) 376-7700 (TDD (202) 376-8116). Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting. 

The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the Commission. 

Dated at Washington, DC, November 13, 2004. 

Aonghas St. Hillarie, 

Acting Chief Managing Officer. 

[FR Doc. 04-26264 Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
---

Exhibit 4.8

AGREEMENT

THIS AGREEMENT is dated for reference the 5th day of
March, 2005.

BETWEEN:

LINUXWIZARDRY SYSTEMS, INC.
#120, 3011 Viking Way Richmond, BC V6V 1W1

("Linux")

OF THE FIRST PART

AND:

TERYL RESOURCES CORP.#120,
3011 Viking Way Richmond, BC V6V 1W1

("Teryl")

OF THE SECOND PART

1..

WHEREAS:

A.        Linux owns a 50%
interest in 30 claims in Fairbanks, Alaska called the Fish Creek Claims;

B.        Linux and Teryl
have agreed to a joint venture on the Fish Creek Claims in an agreement dated
March 5,2002;

NOW THEREFORE in consideration of the mutual covenants and
conditions set forth herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1.        Linux agrees to
extend the said Fish Creek Claims agreement until March 5,2007, in consideration
for 100,000 shares of Teryl Resources Corp

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this
Agreement as of the day and year first above written.

|LINUXWIZARDRY SYSTEMS, INC. |  | TERYL RESOURCES CORP.   
|--------------------------- |  | ------------------------
|                            |  |                         
|                            |  |                         
|/s/ John
      Robertson    |  | /s/
      John Robertson
|Signature                   |  | Signature               
|                            |  |                         
|John
      Robertson        |  | John Robertson          
|Print Name                  |  | Print Name              
|                            |  |                         
|President                   |  | President               
|Title                       |  | Title                   

---
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Salomon Smith Barney Orion Futures Fund L.P. (the"Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the periodending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, David J. Vogel, President and Director of Citigroup Managed FuturesLLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Partnership.

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

David J.VogelCitigroup Managed Futures LLC President and Director

November 9, 2004

----
# Amtsblatt C 366A/30.

| | ISSN 1977-088X |
| --- | --- |
| Amtsblatt
  der Europäischen Union | C 366A |
| | |
| Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache | Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen | 63. Jahrgang30. Oktober 2020 |

ISSN 1977-088X

Amtsblatt

der Europäischen Union

C 366A

Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache

Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen

63. Jahrgang30. Oktober 2020

---

| Inhalt | Seite |
| --- | --- |
| | Berichtigungen |
| 2020/C 366 A/01 | Berichtigung der Stellenausschreibung CONS/AD/162/20 ( ABl. C 358 A vom 26.10.2020 ) | 1 |

Inhalt

Seite

Berichtigungen

2020/C 366 A/01

Berichtigung der Stellenausschreibung CONS/AD/162/20 ( ABl. C 358 A vom 26.10.2020 )

( ABl. C 358 A vom 26.10.2020 )

1

---

| DE | |
| --- | --- |

DE

---

Berichtigungen

| 30.10.2020 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | CA 366/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2020

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

CA 366/1

---

Berichtigung der Stellenausschreibung CONS/AD/162/20

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 358 A vom 26. Oktober 2020
  )

(2020/C 366 A/01)

Seite 1, unter „ALLGEMEINE INFORMATIONEN“, „Dienststelle“:

| Anstatt: | „GD RELEX: Auswärtige Angelegenheiten, Erweiterung und Katastrophenschutz“ |
| --- | --- |

Anstatt:

„GD RELEX: Auswärtige Angelegenheiten, Erweiterung und Katastrophenschutz“

| muss es heißen: | „GD RELEX: „Außenbeziehungen“. |
| --- | --- |

muss es heißen:

muss es heißen:

„GD RELEX: „Außenbeziehungen“.

Seite 1, unter „Wer wir sind“, Absatz 2:

| Anstatt: | „Die Generaldirektion ‚Auswärtige Angelegenheiten, Erweiterung und Katastrophenschutz‘ (GD RELEX) umfasst derzeit zwei Direktionen: RELEX.1, zuständig für Handel, Entwicklung, Sicherheit und Koordinierung, und RELEX.2, zuständig für Erweiterung, den Nahen Osten und Nordafrika, Katastrophenschutz.“ |
| --- | --- |

Anstatt:

Anstatt:

„Die Generaldirektion ‚Auswärtige Angelegenheiten, Erweiterung und Katastrophenschutz‘ (GD RELEX) umfasst derzeit zwei Direktionen: RELEX.1, zuständig für Handel, Entwicklung, Sicherheit und Koordinierung, und RELEX.2, zuständig für Erweiterung, den Nahen Osten und Nordafrika, Katastrophenschutz.“

| muss es heißen: | „Die Generaldirektion ‚Außenbeziehungen‘ (GD RELEX) umfasst derzeit zwei Direktionen: RELEX.1, zuständig für Handel, Entwicklung und Sicherheit, und RELEX.2, zuständig für Nachbarschaftspolitik und Krisenreaktion.“ |
| --- | --- |

muss es heißen:

muss es heißen:

„Die Generaldirektion ‚Außenbeziehungen‘ (GD RELEX) umfasst derzeit zwei Direktionen: RELEX.1, zuständig für Handel, Entwicklung und Sicherheit, und RELEX.2, zuständig für Nachbarschaftspolitik und Krisenreaktion.“

---