alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§12661 to 12664. Repealed. Pub. L. 111–13, title I, §1831(a), Apr. 21, 2009, 123 Stat. 1578

Section 12661, Pub. L. 101–610, title III, §302, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3180, related to findings and purpose of the Points of Light Foundation.

Section 12662, Pub. L. 101–610, title III, §303, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3181; Pub. L. 103–82, title IV, §402(b)(4), Sept. 21, 1993, 107 Stat. 919, granted Presidential authority to designate for funding a private, nonprofit organization known as the Points of Light Foundation.

Section 12663, Pub. L. 101–610, title III, §304, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3181, related to grants to the Foundation.

Section 12664, Pub. L. 101–610, title III, §305, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3181, related to eligibility of the Foundation for grants.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 2009, see section 6101(a) of Pub. L. 111–13, set out as an Effective Date of 2009 Amendment note under section 4950 of this title.
EXHIBIT 23.1
                                                                    ------------




                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Forms S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-45618, 333-65878 and 333-97235) pertaining to
the 1995 Share Option and Incentive Plan, 1998 Share Option and Incentive Plan,
2000 Employees Share Purchase Plan, Amended and Restated 1998 Share Option and
Incentive Plan and the Precise Software Solutions Ltd. Stock Option Plan
(Formerly Savant Corporation Stock Option Plan) and on Forms S-3 (Registration
Nos. 333-81620,333-65876 and 333-102859) of Precise Software Solutions Ltd. and
in the related prospectus of our report dated January 21, 2003, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements of Precise Software Solutions Ltd.
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.




                                                /s/ Kost Forer and Gabbay


March 12, 2003                                  KOST, FORER and GABBAY
Tel-Aviv, Israel                                A Member of Ernst & Young Global
|ABN AMRO Series 2000 2
Aggregate Statement of Principal and Interest Distributions to Certificateholders
for 200201 to 200212
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Class                                                                                                                        
|R 1                                                                                                                          
|A 1                                                                                                                          
|A 10                                                                                                                         
|A 2                                                                                                                          
|A 3                                                                                                                          
|A 4                                                                                                                          
|A 5                                                                                                                          
|A 6                                                                                                                          
|A 7                                                                                                                          
|A 8                                                                                                                          
|A 9                                                                                                                          
|A P                                                                                                                          
|A X                                                                                                                          
|B 1                                                                                                                          
|B 2                                                                                                                          
|B 3                                                                                                                          
|B 4                                                                                                                          
|B 5                                                                                                                          
|M                                                                                                                            
|R                                                                                                                            

Bottom of Form 1
[Civil No. 213.

Filed January 19, 1889.]

[20 Pac. 310.]

#### BOSTON AND ARIZONA SMELTING AND REDUCTION COMPANY, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ROBERT A. LEWIS et al., Defendants and Appellants.

1. Appeal and Error—Incompetent Testimony—Trial by Court— Presumptions—Harmless Error.—In an appeal from a trial before the court, the court of last resort will look into the record to see if the conclusion is right after disregarding the incompetent testimony, assuming that the trial judge did not consider the same. Harmless error is not ground for reversal.

2. Same—Weight or Evidence.—Where there is competent evidence in a case to sustain the conclusions this court cannot consider its weight; that is for the trial court.

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the First Judicial District in and for the County of Cochise. D. H. Pinney, Judge.

Affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

Haynes & Mitchell, for Appellants.

There can be no doubt there was error in the admission of the testimony complained of. To prevent a reversal, therefore, it rests upon the respondent to show that we were not prejudiced; that the error was harmless; and this must be made to appear clearly. *Rice*v. *Neath,*39 Cal. 609; *Sweeney*v. *Riley,*42 Cal. 402; *Ponce*v. *McElvey,*51 Cal. 459; *Innes*v. *Steamer Senator,*1 Cal. 459; *Santillan*v. *Moses,*1 Cal. 92.

W. H. Stilwell, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is a suit adverse to the application for a patent to a mineral claim, alleging that defendants, in their application for a patent to the Merry Christmas claim, had included a portion of the Knoxville claim. The pleadings attack the Knoxville location, alleging that it was not marked on the ground by monuments; also that, if ever properly located, it has been abandoned by failure to do annual assess*6ment work. The cause was tried by the court without a jury. The evidence is very voluminous, and very conflicting. We find in the record much testimony incompetent, because hearsay, admitted over the objections of defendants, and much testimony objectionable in character that seems to have been admitted, but not formally ruled upon. Had this cause been tried by a jury, a verdict rendered with this evidence before them could not stand. But, in appeals from a trial before the court, the court of last resort will look into the record to see if the conclusion is right after discarding the incompetent evidence; assuming that the trial judge did not consider the same. A harmless error will not he ground for reversal. We have to that end carefully examined this record, and conclude that the findings should not he disturbed. There is competent legal evidence to sustain the conclusions in this case, and we cannot consider its weight; that is for the trial court.

The judgment of the court below is “affirmed.
#### Robert O’Donnell *v.*Arthur A. Rindfleisch et al.

*Peter Schwartz,*in support of the petition.

Decided February 25, 1988

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 13 Conn. App. 194, is denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Centennial Specialty Foods
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Douglas L. Evans, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                                /s/ DOUGLAS L. EVANS
                                                -----------------------
                                                Douglas L. Evans
                                                Chief Financial Officer

Dated: August 16, 2004
### §10513. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 10513 was editorially reclassified as section 50112 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
Presidential Documents

67633

Federal Register 

Vol. 69, No. 223

Friday, November 19, 2004

Title 3— 

The President 

Executive Order 13361 of November 16, 2004

Assignment of Functions Under the United States Leadership 

Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria Act of 2003

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, including section 301 of title 3, 

United States Code, it is hereby ordered as follows: 

Section 1. Executive Order 12163 of September 29, 1979, as amended, is 

further amended as follows: 

(a) in subsection 1–100(a), by striking the period at the end of paragraph 

(15), by inserting a semicolon at the end of paragraph (15), and by adding 

at the end thereof the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(16) the United States Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and 

Malaria Act of 2003 (Public Law 108–25)(the ‘‘HIV/AIDS Act’’), as amended, and amendments made by the HIV/AIDS Act, which the Secretary 

shall perform, in the case of section 304, after consultation with the 

Secretary of Health and Human Services.’’; 

(b) in section 1–701, by inserting, after subsection (g), the following new 

subsections: 

‘‘(h) Those functions conferred by section 1(f)(1) and section 

1(f)(2)(B)(ii)(VII) of the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956, 

as amended (22 U.S.C. 2651a). 

‘‘(i) Those functions conferred by section 202(d)(4)(C)(i) and (ii) of the 

HIV/AIDS Act, as amended.’’; 

(c) by adding at the end thereof the following new section: 

‘‘1–906. Implementation. In carrying out this order, officers of the United 

States shall ensure that all actions taken by them are consistent with 

the President’s constitutional authority to: (a) conduct the foreign affairs 

of the United States; (b) withhold information the disclosure of which 

could impair the foreign relations, the national security, the deliberative 

processes of the Executive, or the performance of the Executive’s constitutional duties; (c) recommend for congressional consideration such measures 

as the President may judge necessary and expedient; and (d) supervise 

the unitary executive branch.’’. 

Sec. 2. Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise 

affect the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget 

relating to budget, administrative, or legislative proposals. 

Sec. 3. This order is intended only to improve the internal management 

of the executive branch and is not intended to, and does not, create any 

right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity 

67634 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 223 / Friday, November 19, 2004 / Presidential Documents 

by a party against the United States, its departments, agencies, entities, 

Billing code 3195

Filed 10

[FR Doc. 04

–18–

–

04; 8:45 am] 

25866

–01–P 

officers, employees or agents, or any other person.

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

November 16, 2004. 

W
#### Orson C. Hoyt, Respondent, v. Evans R. Dick and Others, Appellants.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE****SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Darryl K. Horne, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Horne International, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s third fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information;and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     By: /s/ Darryl K. Horne       Darryl K. Horne  President and Chief Executive Officer  Horne International, Inc.       November 13, 2007  
23
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE





CONTACT:Jennifer Martinez, 312-822-5167Sarah Pang, 312-822-6394





ROBERT LINDEMANN ANNOUNCES RETIREMENT





CHICAGO - December 19 , 2014 - CNA Financial Corporation (NYSE: CNA) today announced the retirement of Robert Lindemann, president and chief operating officer of CNA Commercial - a $3.5 billion commercial property and casualty business - effective December 31, 2014.





With an insurance career that spans more than three decades, Bob has used his expertise to help strengthen CNA’s top and bottom lines. He played a critical role in establishing the company’s core segments in Construction, Financial Institutions, Healthcare, Manufacturing, Professional Services, Small Business and Technology. He also helped strengthen product offerings, most recently exemplified with the launch of CNA Paramount, the company’s comprehensive package for mid-sized businesses.





“Bob is among the most respected underwriters and leaders in the commercial insurance industry. He played a critical role in launching our customer segment strategy, and I want to thank him for the tremendous contributions he has made to the company and the industry,” said Thomas F. Motamed, chairman and chief executive officer.





Pending the appointment of a successor, Dave Rutkowski, senior vice president, Commercial Underwriting, will assume certain of Bob’s responsibilities, including day-to-day operational duties, reporting to Tom Motamed.





Dave joined CNA in 2009. “He has proven himself in both Headquarters and Field positions, with a long track record of developing and executing underwriting strategies and differentiated customer value propositions,” Motamed added.





Prior to joining CNA, Dave was with Zurich North America, where he served as Senior Vice President for its Middle Market Commercial business. In this role, Dave was responsible for developing the operating strategies that returned the division to profitability through underwriting and product initiatives, rate actions, and book mix change by line of business and industry class. Prior to Zurich, Dave held underwriting and Field leadership roles for several major insurance carriers, where he led and motivated teams in achieving challenging objectives.





Serving businesses and professionals since 1897, CNA is the country’s eighth largest commercial insurance writer and the 13th largest property and casualty company.  CNA’s insurance products include standard commercial lines, specialty lines, surety, marine and other property and casualty coverages.  CNA's services include risk management, information services, underwriting, risk control and claims administration.  For more information, please visit CNA at www.cna.com "CNA" is a service mark registered by CNA Financial Corporation with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Certain CNA Financial Corporation subsidiaries use the "CNA" service mark in connection with insurance underwriting and claims activities.





Follow CNA (NYSE: CNA) on: Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIN





1


---







###








2
IN RESPONSE, PLEASE 

 REFER TO: M150113A 

January 13, 2015 

MEMORANDUM FOR: Brooke Poole, Director 

Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication 

FROM: Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS - AFFIRMATION SESSION, 9:25 A.M., 

TUESDAY, JANUARY 13, 2015, COMMISSIONERS' 

CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH, 

ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND (OPEN TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE) 

I. SECY-14-0133 – Fermi Combined License Application: LBP-14-9, Memorandum 

Requesting Commission Approval for Sua Sponte Review (July 7, 2014); Intervenors’ 

Petition for Review of Atomic Safety and Licensing Board’s Dismissal of Contention 23 

for Lack of Timeliness (Oct. 6, 2014) 

The Commission approved a Memorandum and Order responding to the Atomic Safety and 

Licensing Board’s request to review, sua sponte, issues relating to the environmental impacts of 

the proposed transmission-line corridor for Fermi Unit 3 and Intervenor’s petition for review of 

the Board’s dismissal of a related proposed contention. The Memorandum and Order denies 

the Board’s request for sua sponte review and denies Intervenors’ petition for review. 

(Subsequently, on January 13, 2015, the Secretary signed the Memorandum and Order.) 

Attachment: 

As stated 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 EDO 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCAA 

 OCA 

 OIG 

 OPA 

 Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR
### SUBCHAPTER XII–K—FAMILY SUPPORT
No: III-14-041 November 28, 2014

CONTACT: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663

NRC Seeks Comment On Proposed License Termination 

At Jefferson Proving Ground

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a public meeting on Wed., Dec. 3, in Madison, 

Ind., to discuss the agency’s review of the U.S. Army’s request to terminate the NRC license for the 

Depleted Uranium Impact Area at the Jefferson Proving Ground, located in southeastern Indiana. 

The meeting will be held from 7 to 10 p.m. EST at The Livery Stable, 309 Broadway Street, in 

Madison. The NRC will hold an open house at 6 p.m. EST to provide interested citizens with an 

opportunity to talk informally with agency staff. 

The meeting will include the NRC’s presentation on the agency’s process for the license 

termination safety and environmental review, followed by comments from the public. The meeting will 

be transcribed. Public comments will be considered by the NRC staff and will be used in preparing an 

Environmental Impact Statement, which will assess the potential environmental impacts of the Army’s 

proposed action and alternatives to the proposed action. 

“Public input is a cornerstone of the agency’s scoping process for the Environmental Impact 

Statement,” said NRC Senior Project Manager Stephen Lemont. “We hope area residents will 

participate in this meeting to provide comments about the environmental issues they consider 

significant.”

The Jefferson Proving Ground was used by the Army between 1941 and 1995 for test firing of 

conventional munitions. Between 1984 and 1994, the Army test fired depleted uranium projectiles 

under an NRC license in the Depleted Uranium Impact Area. Some of the undetonated munitions and 

depleted uranium remain in this area of the Jefferson Proving Ground. In 2000, the operation of the 

former proving ground passed to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and is currently known as the Big 

Oaks National Wildlife Refuge. However, the Army retains ownership of the property.

In 2013, the Army submitted a request to the NRC to terminate the license for the Depleted 

Uranium Impact Area under restricted conditions. The Army proposes to leave the depleted uranium 

and the undetonated munitions in place while it continues to maintain institutional control over the area, 

such as physical access restrictions. 

 Members of the public may register at the meeting to present oral comments. Written 

comments can also be provided at the meeting; submitted through the Federal Rulemaking Website by 
Page | 2

searching for Docket ID NRC-2014-0097; or mailed to Cindy Bladey, Office of Administration, Mail 

Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-001.

 Documents related to this action can be found in the Federal Rulemaking Website under Docket 

ID NRC-2014-0097, in the NRC’s electronic document system, and at the Madison Branch of the 

Jefferson County Public Library.