alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### **Exhibit 31-1**

****

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Gerald E.Johnston,****certify that:

1.         I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The CloroxCompany;

2         Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;

3.         Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;

4.         Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a‑15(e) and15d‑15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)         designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this reportis being prepared;

b)        evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)        disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and

5.        The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

a)        all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)        any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant rolein the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date:  February 10,2004

/s/ Gerald E.Johnston                     

Gerald E. Johnston

President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer

----
### §1394. Payments to States; adjustments; advances or reimbursement; installments; conditions

Payment of grants under this subchapter may be made (after necessary adjustment on account of previously made underpayments or overpayments) in advance or by way of reimbursement, and in such installments and on such conditions, as the Secretary may determine.

(Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XVII, §1704, as added Pub. L. 88–156, §5, Oct. 24, 1963, 77 Stat. 276.)
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Paul Paxhia, Appellant, v Anthony Zon, as Superintendent of Wende Correctional Facility, Respondent.

[820 NYS2d 920]

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s motion to be relieved of assignment granted *(see People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38 [1979]). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Timothy J. Drury, A.J. — Habeas Corpus). Present — Pigott, Jr., PJ., Kehoe, Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.
AGv 6A+

No. Part No. Part

1 Motor 10 Pump Interface

2 Propeller 11 Tank

3 Motor Mount 12 Pump

4 GPS Antenna 13 Landing Gear

5 Dome 14 GPS Holder

6 Folding Arms 15 Circuit Board

7 Lift Rod 16 Head Plate

8 Nozzle 17 Side Board

9 Spray Bar 18 Landing Gear 6

2 3 5

9 4

14 8 7

13 1 11 8 10 12 18 17 16

15
### §12355. Authorization of appropriations

#### (a) Establishment of Center

To carry out section 12353 of this title, there are authorized to be appropriated $2,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 1995 through 1998.

#### (b) Evaluation

To carry out section 12354 of this title, there are authorized to be appropriated $1,000,000 for fiscal year 1995, and such sums as may be necessary for each of the fiscal years 1996 through 1998.

(Pub. L. 101–501, title IX, §960, Nov. 3, 1990, 104 Stat. 1279; Pub. L. 103–252, title IV, §403(b), May 18, 1994, 108 Stat. 673.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–252, §403(b)(1), substituted "$2,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 1995 through 1998" for "$2,300,000 for fiscal year 1991, and such sums as may be necessary for each of the fiscal years 1992 through 1994".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 103–252, §403(b)(2), substituted "$1,000,000 for fiscal year 1995, and such sums as may be necessary for each of the fiscal years 1996 through 1998" for "$700,000 for fiscal year 1991, and such sums as may be necessary for each of the fiscal years 1992 through 1994".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1990, see section 1001(a) of Pub. L. 101–501, set out as an Effective Date of 1990 Amendment note under section 8621 of this title.
### Part H—Encouraging Use of Alternative Fuels

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This part was, in the original, designated part J and has been changed to part H for purposes of codification.
### SUBCHAPTER X—TRAUMA CARE
#### § 766.19 Reopening.

The respondent may petition the administrative law judge within one year of the date of the final decision, except where the decision arises from a default judgment or from a settlement, to reopen an administrative enforcement proceeding to receive any relevant and material evidence which was unknown or unobtainable at the time the proceeding was held. The petition must include a summary of such evidence, the reasons why it is deemed relevant and material, and the reasons why it could not have been presented at the time the proceedings were held. The administrative law judge will grant or deny the petition after providing other parties reasonable opportunity to comment. If the proceeding is reopened, the administrative law judge may make such arrangements as the judge deems appropriate for receiving the new evidence and completing the record. The administrative law judge will then issue a new initial or recommended decision and order, and the case will proceed to final decision and order in accordance with § 766.21 or § 766.22 of this part, as appropriate.
### §12163. Conformance of accessibility standards

Accessibility standards included in regulations issued under this subpart shall be consistent with the minimum guidelines issued by the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board under section 12204(a) of this title.

(Pub. L. 101–336, title II, §243, July 26, 1990, 104 Stat. 352.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 18 months after July 26, 1990, see section 246(a) of Pub. L. 101–336, set out as a note under section 12161 of this title.
No: 14-080 November 17, 2014

CONTACT: Dave McIntyre, 301-415-8200 

NRC Issues Final Environmental Impact Statement for 

Callaway Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued its final supplemental environmental impact 

statement for the proposed renewal of the operating license for the Callaway nuclear power plant in 

Missouri. The report concludes there are no environmental impacts that would preclude renewing the 

plant’s license.

The Callaway plant is a single pressurized water reactor and is licensed to operate through Oct. 

18, 2024. Union Electric Co., a subsidiary of Ameren Missouri, applied on Dec. 15, 2011, to renew the 

license for an additional 20 years.

The license renewal review process proceeds along two tracks – one for review of safety issues 

and another for environmental issues. As part of the environmental review of the application, the NRC 

held public meetings near the plant to discuss the review process and the draft version of the 

environmental impact statement. Comments were received and considered from members of the public, 

local officials, and representatives of state and federal agencies.

The NRC published its safety evaluation report in August. The safety report, the final 

supplemental environmental impact statement ((NUREG-1437, Supplement 51), the license renewal 

application and other information on the review, can be found on the NRC website.
### Part A—Organization and General Authorities
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2090

PAUL K. GUNDOTRA; RITA GUNDOTRA,

Petitioners - Appellants,

and

PKG FOUNDATION CORPORATION; TRADING

INTERNATIONAL MARKETS CORPORATION,

Petitioners,

versus

INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. Nos. 93-21652,

93-21653, 93-21654)

Submitted: May 26, 1998 Decided: June 18, 1998

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Paul K. Gundotra, Rita Gundotra, Petitioners Pro Se. Gilbert

Steven Rothenberg, Gary R. Allen, David English Carmack, Janet A.

Bradley, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for

Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Paul K. and Rita Gundotra appeal from the tax court’s final

decision upholding the Commissioner’s determination of a deficiency

and addition to tax pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6662 with respect to

their 1989 federal income tax liability. We have reviewed the

record and the tax court’s opinions and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the tax court. Gundotra

v. Internal Revenue, Tax Ct. No. 93-21652 (U.S. Tax Ct., Oct. 24,

1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350
by Chief Executive Officer

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of VSB Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, Raffaele
M. Branca, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                     |                          | 
|-------------------- | ------------------------ | 
|Date: May
  14, 2008 |                         
|                     |                         
|                     | /s/ Raffaele
  M. Branca
|                     |                          | 
|                     | Raffaele M.
  Branca    
|                     | President
  and CEO     

A signed
original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

24

---
Exhibit 32.1

                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                           by Chief Executive Officer

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of VSB Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Merton Corn, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: August 10, 2004

                                               /s/ MERTON CORN
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Merton Corn, President and CEO


A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       29
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 228 (Monday, November 29, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69365-69368]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26281]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


DOE Notification That an Additional 45-Days Is Needed To Develop 
Its Implementation Plan in Response to Recommendation 2004-1 of the 
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, Oversight of Complex, High-
Hazard Nuclear Operations

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 
2004-1, concerning oversight of complex, high-hazard nuclear operations 
was published in the Federal Register on June 7, 2004 (69 FR 31815). 
The Secretary accepted the Recommendation on July 21, 2004 (69 FR 
48476). In accordance with section 315(e) of the Atomic Energy Act of 
1954, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2286d(e), the Secretary informed the 
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board that the Department requires an 
additional 45 days to complete its implementation plan. With the 
additional 45-days allowed to complete its implementation plan, the 
Department expects to approve

[[Page 69366]]

the 2004-1 implementation plan by December 23, 2004.

ADDRESSES: Send comments, data, views, or arguments concerning the 
Secretary's response to: Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 625 
Indiana Avenue NW., Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Theodore D. Sherry, Deputy 
Manager, Department of Energy, NNSA Y-12 Site Office, 200 
Administration Road, P.O. Box 2001, Oak Ridge, TN 37830.

    Issued in Washington, DC on November 23, 2004.
Mark B. Whitaker, Jr.,
Departmental Representative to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety 
Board.
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P

[[Page 69367]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN29NO04.000


[[Page 69368]]


[FR Doc. 04-26281 Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-C
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Little SiouxCorn Processors, L.L.C. (the “Company”) for the three month fiscal quarterended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gary Grotjohn, Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |  /s/ Gary Grotjohn |         |
|--------|-------------------------|--------------|
|   | Gary Grotjohn           |         |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   | Dated:                  | May 13, 2005 |   |
|        |                         |              |  |  |

 

----
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed October 1, 2014.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

Nos. 3D14-1023; 3D14-0627

Lower Tribunal No. 99-37608

________________

Arthur W. Foley,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

Appeals under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the

Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Ariana Fajardo, Judge.

Arthur W. Foley, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SUAREZ, EMAS and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.
On May 5, 2014, in Case Number 3D14-1023, Arthur W. Foley, filed a

Notice of Appeal from the trial court’s April 17, 2014, “Order Recommending

Sanctions and Directions to the Clerk of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court,”

wherein the trial court recommended that Foley be sanctioned for abusing the

judicial process and directed the Clerk of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit not to

accept any further filings from Foley unless signed by an attorney duly licensed to

practice law in Florida. 

On July 10, 2014, we consolidated Case Number 3D14-06271 with the

instant case, 3D14-1023, and ordered Foley to file his initial brief within twenty

days of the date of that order, i.e., by July 30, 2014, limited only to arguments

directed in Case Number 3D14-1023.

Having filed no initial brief by July 30, this court, on August 20, 2014,

ordered Foley to show cause within ten days why the appeal in Case Number

3D14-1023 should not be dismissed for failure to file an initial brief. To date,

Foley has not filed an initial brief. 

Therefore, we dismiss the appeal in Case Number 3D14-1023. We further

allow Foley twenty days from the date of this opinion to respond to this court’s

1 Foley appealed the denial of the trial court’s February 27, 2014, order denying his

motion for postconviction relief. On May 28, 2014, this court affirmed the order

and simultaneously ordered Foley to show cause why he should not be prohibited

from filing further pro se pleadings relating to lower tribunal case number 99-

37608 lest he face sanctions. See Foley v. State, 139 So. 3d 456 (Fla. 3d DCA

2014). 

2
previous May 28, 2014, show cause order as to why he should not be prohibited

from filing any further pro se appeals, pleadings, motion, or petitions relating to

lower tribunal number 99-37608. No further extensions shall be granted.2

Appeal dismissed; show cause order issued.

2

In response to our initial show cause order in Foley, 139 So. 3d at 456, Foley

urged us to provide him more time in which to respond to the order, contending he

had other pending appeals in this court. We implicitly granted Foley’s request by

consolidating the cases and affording him time to file an initial brief.

3
|        |
|--------|
|   |  |
|   | Washington Office - Table of Organization |

    DirectorDeputyDirector - JonesDeputy Director - Hogan   Chief, National         Wildlife Refuge SystemDeputy ChiefAssistant Director Migratory         Birds and State Programs
 Deputy AD      Assistant         Director-Fisheries and Habitat Conservation Deputy ADAssistant Director-Endangered SpeciesDeputy ADAssistant Director-International AffairsDeputy AD |
Assistant Director-Law           Enforcement

Deputy AD 
Assistant Director-External AffairsDeputy ADAssistant Director-Budget, Planning, and HumanResources        Deputy ADAssistant Director-Business Management andOperationsDeputy ADNational Wildlife Refuge System
Division of RealtyDivision of Migratory Bird Management
Division of Bird Habitat Conservation
Division of Federal Duck Stamp
Division of Federal Aid
Division of Conservation Partnerships LiaisonDivision of Fish and Wildlife Management Assistance and HabitatRestoration
Division of the National Fish Hatchery System
Division of Federal Program Activities
Division of Environmental QualityDivision of Endangered SpeciesDivision of Management Authority
Division of Scientific Authority
Division of International Conservation||||||||||||||Division of Law Enforcement Operations
Division of Special Operations
Clark R. Bavin National Forensics LaboratoryDivision of Congressional and Legislative Affairs
Division of Public Affairs
National Conservation Training Center
Native American LiaisonDivision of Human Resources
Branch of Diversity and Civil Rights
Division of Budget
Division of Policy and Directives Management
Planning and Evaluation StaffDivision of Engineering
Division of Contracting and General Services
Division of Information Resources Management
Division of Finance
Division of Economics
Division of Safety, Health, and AviationRegional DirectorRegion 1Portland,OR        Deputy RDManagerCalifornia/ Nevada OperationsDeputy ManagerRegional DirectorRegion 2Albuquerque, NMDeputy RDRegional Director Region 3Ft.Snelling, MNDeputy RDRegional DirectorRegion 4Atlanta, GADeputy RDRegional DirectorRegion 5Hadley, MADeputy RDRegional DirectorRegion 6Denver, CODeputy RDRegional DirectorRegion 7Anchorage, AKDeputy RD
*Questions/comments?* See our Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ's) before you contact us.****
Office DirectoryIndex/Site MapU. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Home PagePrivacy/Disclaimer
#### § 1110.5 Acceptable certificates.

A certificate that is in hard copy or electronic form and complies with all applicable requirements of this part 1110 meets the certificate requirements of section 14 of the CPSA. This does not relieve the importer or domestic manufacturer from the underlying statutory requirements concerning the supporting testing and/or other bases to support certification and issuance of certificates.