alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
LICENSING BOARD TO HEAR ORAL ARGUMENT MARCH 1

ON DAVIS-BESSE REACTOR LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION

An Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB) will conduct oral argument March 1 in 

Port Clinton, Ohio, regarding FirstEnergy’s application to renew the operating license for the

Davis-Besse nuclear power plant near Oak Harbor, Ohio. The Atomic Safety and License Board 

Panel is the independent body within the NRC that presides over hearings where the public can 

challenge proposed licensing and enforcement actions.

The ASLB will start its session at 9 a.m. EST on Tuesday, March 1, in the Common 

Pleas courtroom in the Ottawa County Court House at 315 Madison St. in Port Clinton. The 

session is expected to conclude by 4:30 p.m. The session is open for public observation, but 

participation will be limited to designated representatives of the groups seeking admittance to the 

proceeding (Beyond Nuclear, Citizens Environment Alliance of Southwestern Ontario [Ontario 

Citizens Alliance], Don’t Waste Michigan and the Green Party of Ohio, collectively the “Joint 

Petitioners”), and counsel for FirstEnergy and NRC staff involved in the proceeding. Early 

arrival is suggested to allow for security screening for those interested in attending. NRC policy 

prohibits disruptive behavior in the hearing room, as well as signs, banners, posters or displays

larger than 18 inches by 18 inches.

FirstEnergy submitted the Davis-Besse license renewal application to the NRC on

Aug. 27, 2010, seeking a 20-year extension of the license for the plant, from the current 

expiration date of April 22, 2017, to April 22, 2037. The Joint Petitioners have submitted four 

objections, or contentions, challenging FirstEnergy’s application. The ASLB will question the 

parties regarding whether the contentions can be resolved under the NRC’s jurisdiction.

Documents related to the Davis-Besse license renewal application are available on the 

NRC website at: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications/davisbesse.html . Documents pertaining to the ASLB proceeding, including the Joint Petitioners’

contentions, are available in the agency’s Electronic Hearing Docket at:

http://ehd1.nrc.gov/EHD/.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-016 February 3, 2011
More information about the ASLB can be found at: http://www.nrc.gov/aboutnrc/organization/aslbpfuncdesc.html. 

###

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand.

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
MediciNova, Inc. for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the Report), I, Shintaro Asako, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of MediciNova, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MediciNova, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.



Date:

November 9, 2007By:

/s/    SHINTARO
ASAKOShintaro Asako Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


This certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
#### § 990.10 Purpose.

The goal of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA), 33 U.S.C. 2701 *et seq.,* is to make the environment and public whole for injuries to natural resources and services resulting from an incident involving a discharge or substantial threat of a discharge of oil (incident).

This goal is achieved through the return of the injured natural resources and services to baseline and compensation for interim losses of such natural resources and services from the date of the incident until recovery. The purpose of this part is to promote expeditious and cost-effective restoration of natural resources and services injured as a result of an incident. To fulfill this purpose, this part provides a natural resource damage assessment process for developing a plan for restoration of the injured natural resources and services and pursuing implementation or funding of the plan by responsible parties. This part also provides an administrative process for involving interested parties in the assessment, a range of assessment procedures for identifying and evaluating injuries to natural resources and services, and a means for selecting restoration actions from a reasonable range of alternatives.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Elesano Troiani, Alias Liseno Troiani, True Name, Elesano John Troiani, Appellant.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of the County Court, Queens County, convicting him, after trial, of the crimes of grand larceny in the first degree and possessing a dangerous weapon, and from the sentence imposed. Judgment unanimously affirmed. The matters claimed to constitute error did not affect the substantial rights of appellant. (Code Grim. Pro., § 542.) No separate appeal lies from the sentence, which has been reviewed on the appeal from the judgment of conviction. Present — Nolan, P. J., Schmidt, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 24, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68302-68303]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26085]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Foreign Agricultural Service


Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers

AGENCY: Foreign Agricultural Service, USDA.

[[Page 68303]]


ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS), today 
terminated the certification of a petition for trade adjustment 
assistance (TAA) that was filed by the Catfish Farmers of America and 
certified on November 25, 2003. Catfish producers in Alabama, Arkansas, 
Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, 
Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, South 
Carolina, Texas, and Utah will not be eligible for TAA benefits in 
fiscal year 2005.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Upon investigation, the Administrator 
determined that domestic producer prices did not decline at least 20 
percent during the 2003 marketing year (January-December), when 
compared to average prices during the 5-year base period ending 
December 2001. In addition, during the 2003 marketing year, imports did 
not increase, but declined by 16.2 percent. Both conditions, a decline 
in prices of at least 20 percent and an increase in imports, are 
required for re-certifying a petition for TAA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: Jean-Louis Pajot, Coordinator, Trade 
Adjustment Assistance for Farmers, FAS, USDA, (202) 720-2916, e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ed999f8c8988c38c8987989e9980888399ad8b8c9ec3989e898cc38a829b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f28680939697dc9396988781869f979c86b2949381dc87819693dc959d84">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: November 10, 2004.
A. Ellen Terpstra,
Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service.
[FR Doc. 04-26085 Filed 11-23-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-10-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No: II-14-030 May 14, 2014

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417

 Joey Ledford 404-997-4416

NRC Schedules Meeting to Discuss Annual Assessment of St. Lucie Nuclear Plant

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a meeting on May 23 to discuss 

the agency’s assessment of safety performance during 2013 at the St. Lucie nuclear power plant. The 

plant, operated by Florida Power & Light Co., is located about 10 miles southeast of Fort Pierce near 

Jensen Beach, Fla.

The meeting is scheduled to begin at 1 p.m. with a brief presentation at the Havert L. Fenn 

Center, 2000 Virginia Ave, in Fort Pierce. That session will be followed by an open house/poster 

session explaining the NRC’s role and the NRC staff will be available to answer questions on the safety 

performance of the plant last year. 

“Our resident and region-based inspectors spend many hours monitoring plant activities to 

ensure that the plant operates safely,” said NRC Region II Administrator Victor McCree. “We hold 

these meetings every year to make our staff available to people who live close to the plant and answer 

questions about our oversight.”

A letter sent from the NRC Region II office to plant officials addresses the performance of the 

plant during 2013 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the NRC 

website.

The NRC review concluded that the St. Lucie plant operated in a manner that preserved public 

health and safety and protected the environment. Based on the plant’s performance, the NRC staff plans 

to continue the detailed routine or baseline inspections this year that all nuclear power plants receive.

The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess plant 

performance. The colors start with green, which has very low safety significance, and then progress to

white, yellow or red, based on the significance of the issues. Inspection findings and performance 

indicators are updated on the NRC’s website each quarter. 

Current performance information for St. Lucie Unit 1 and Unit 2 is available on the NRC 

website.
### SUBCHAPTER XIV—ALBERT EINSTEIN DISTINGUISHED EDUCATOR FELLOWSHIPS

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This subchapter was enacted as part A (§§511–518) of title V of the Improving America's Schools Act of 1994, known as the Albert Einstein Distinguished Educator Fellowship Act of 1994, and not as part of the Department of Energy Organization Act which comprises this chapter.
### Part G—Quarantine and Inspection
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3413 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3413

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 6, 2012

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 1449 West Avenue in Bronx, New York, as the ``Private Isaac T. 
                         Cortes Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRIVATE ISAAC T. CORTES POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1449 West Avenue in Bronx, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Private Isaac T. Cortes Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Private 
Isaac T. Cortes Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 5, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 228 (Monday, November 29, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 69394]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26224]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--DVD Forum

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 17, 2004, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), DVD Forum has filed written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of 
business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature 
and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications 
were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting 
the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances.
    Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: DVD Forum, 
Tokyo, Japan. The nature and scope of DVD Forum's standards development 
activities are: (a) To establish the single DVD Format for each of the 
DVD application products, including revisions, improvements and 
enhancements, that would be in the best interests of consumers and 
users; and (b) to encourage the broad acceptance of DVD Formats on a 
worldwide basis among members of the DVD Forum, related industries, and 
the public.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-26224 Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4416-11-M
```
#### § 1502.9 Modification or revocation of regulation or order.

If, upon review of an objection or request for hearing, the Commission determines that the regulation should be modified or revoked, the Commission will promptly take such action by notice in the Federal Register. Further objections to or requests for hearing on the modification or revocation may be submitted under §§ 1502.5 and 1502.6, but no further issue may be taken with other provisions in the regulation. Objections and requests for hearing that are not affected by the modification or revocation will remain on file and be acted upon in due course.
#### § 1309.1 Purpose and scope.

The purpose of this rule is to prohibit the sale, offer for sale, 9manufacture for sale, distribution in commerce, or importation into the United States, of any crib bumpers, as defined in part 1309.2, as set forth in the Safety Sleep for Babies Act of 2021 (15 U.S.C. 2057e).
§ 1610.31 Definitions. In addition to the definitions provided in section 2 of the Flammable Fabrics Act as amended (15 U.S.C. 1191), and in § 1610.2 of the Standard, the following definitions apply for this subpart. ( a ) *Act* means the “Flammable Fabrics Act” (approved June 30, 1953, Pub. Law 88, 83d Congress, 1st sess., 15 U.S.C. 1191; 67 Stat. 111) as amended, 68 Stat. 770, August 23, 1954.
( b ) *Rule, rules, regulations, and rules and regulations,* mean the rules and regulations prescribed by the Commission pursuant to section 5(c) of the act.
( c ) *United States* means, the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the Territories, and Possessions of the United States.
( d ) *Marketing or handling* means the transactions referred to in section 3 of the Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended in 1967.
( e ) *Test* means the application of the relevant test method prescribed in the procedures provided under section 4(a) of the Act (16 CFR part 1609).
( f ) *Finish type* means a particular finish, but does not include such variables as changes in color, pattern, print, or design, or minor variations in the amount or type of ingredients in the finish formulation. Examples of finish types would be starch finishes, resin finishes or parchmentized finishes.
( g ) *Uncovered or exposed part* means that part of an article of wearing apparel that might during normal wear be open to flame or other means of ignition. The outer surface of an undergarment is considered to be an uncovered or exposed part of an article of wearing apparel, and thus subject to the Act. Other examples of exposed parts of an article of wearing apparel subject to the Act include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Linings, with exposed areas, such as full front zippered jackets;
( 2 ) Sweatshirts with exposed raised fiber surface inside and capable of being worn napped side out;
( 3 ) Unlined hoods;
( 4 ) Rolled cuffs.
( h ) *Coated fabrics* means a flexible material composed of a fabric and any adherent polymeric material applied to one or both surfaces.
### §12781. Authority

The Secretary shall, insofar as is feasible through contract with eligible organizations, develop the capacity of participating jurisdictions, State and local housing finance agencies, nonprofit organizations and for-profit corporations, working in partnership, to identify and meet needs for an increased supply of decent, affordable housing.

(Pub. L. 101–625, title II, §241, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4117.)
§ 1025.22 Prehearing briefs. Not later than ten (10) days prior to the hearing, unless otherwise ordered by the Presiding Officer, the parties may simultaneously serve and file prehearing briefs which should set forth: ( a ) A statement of the facts expected to be proved and of the anticipated order of proof;
( b ) A statement of the issues and the legal arguments in support of the party's contentions with respect to each issue; and
( c ) A table of authorities relied upon.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3617 

To amend the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act to require States 

receiving funds under section 106 of such Act to have in effect a 

State law providing for a criminal penalty on a person who has knowledge 

of child abuse or neglect, but fails to report such abuse or neglect 

to a law enforcement official or child protective services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 8, 2011 

Ms. CLARKE of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act 

to require States receiving funds under section 106 of 

such Act to have in effect a State law providing for 

a criminal penalty on a person who has knowledge of 

child abuse or neglect, but fails to report such abuse 

or neglect to a law enforcement official or child protective 

services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘See Something, Say 

5 Something Act’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3617 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR STATES RECEIVING GRANTS 

2 FOR CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT PREVEN3 TION AND TREATMENT PROGRAMS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 106(b)(2) of the Child 

5 Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (42 U.S.C. 

6 5106a(b)(2)) is amended— 

7 (1) in subparagraph (F), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

8 the end; 

9 (2) in subparagraph (G), by striking the period 

10 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

11 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(H) an assurance in the form of a certifi13 cation by the Governor of the State that the 

14 State has in effect and is enforcing a State law 

15 providing for a criminal penalty on any person 

16 18 years of age or older who fails to report to 

17 a State or local law enforcement official or child 

18 protective services that the person has knowl19 edge of child abuse or neglect that occurred in 

20 the State.’’. 

21 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

22 subsection (a) shall take effect on December 31, 2013. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 33 

To amend the Securities Act of 1933 to specify when certain securities 

issued in connection with church plans are treated as exempted securities 

for purposes of that Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 5, 2011 

Mrs. BIGGERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Securities Act of 1933 to specify when certain 

securities issued in connection with church plans are 

treated as exempted securities for purposes of that Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 AMENDMENT. 

4 Section 3(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 

5 U.S.C. 77c(a)(2)) is amended— 

6 (1) by inserting ‘‘(other than a retirement in7 come account described in section 403(b)(9) of the 

8 Internal Revenue Code of 1986, to the extent that 

9 the interest or participation in such single trust fund 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 33 IH

1 or collective trust fund is issued to a church, a con2 vention or association of churches, or an organiza3 tion described in section 414(e)(3)(A) of such Code 

4 establishing or maintaining the retirement income 

5 account or to a trust established by any such entity 

6 in connection with the retirement income account)’’ 

7 after ‘‘403(b) of such Code’’; and 

8 (2) by inserting ‘‘(other than a person partici9 pating in a church plan who is described in section 

10 414(e)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

11 1986)’’ after ‘‘section 401(c)(1) of such Code’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS