alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 740.1 Introduction. In this part, references to the EAR are references to 15 CFR chapter VII, subchapter C. ( a ) *Scope.* A “License Exception” is an authorization contained in this part that allows you to export or reexport under stated conditions, items subject to the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) that would otherwise require a license under General Prohibition One, Two, Three, or Eight, as indicated under one or more of the Export Control Classification Numbers (ECCNs) in the Commerce Control List (CCL) in supplement no. 1 to part 774 of the EAR and items subject to the EAR that would require a license based on the embargo policies described in part 746 of the EAR. If your export or reexport is subject to General Prohibition Six for embargoed destinations, refer to part 746 of the EAR to determine the availability of any License Exceptions. Special commodity controls apply to short supply items. License Exceptions for items listed on the CCL as controlled for Short Supply reasons are found in part 754 of the EAR. If your export or reexport is subject to General Prohibition Five, consult part 744 of the EAR. If your export or reexport is subject to General Prohibitions Four, Seven, Nine, or Ten, then no License Exceptions apply. Any license exception authorizing reexports also authorizes in-country transfers, provided the terms and conditions for reexports under that license exception are met.
( b ) *Certification.* By using any of the License Exceptions you are certifying that the terms, provisions, and conditions for the use of the License Exception described in the EAR have been met. Please refer to part 758 of the EAR for clearance of shipments and documenting the use of License Exceptions.
( c ) *License Exception symbols.* Each License Exception bears a three letter symbol that will be used for export clearance purposes (see paragraph (d) of this section).
( d ) *Electronic Export Information (EEI) filing.* You must enter on any required EEI filing the correct License Code that corresponds to the appropriate license exception symbol (e.g., LVS, GBS, CIV) and the correct Export Control Classification Number (ECCN) (e.g., 4A003, 5A002) for all exports of items under a license exception. Items temporarily in the United States meeting the provisions of License Exception TMP, under § 740.9(b)(3), are excepted from this requirement. See § 758.1 of the EAR and 15 CFR part 30 of the FTR for EEI requirements.
( e ) *Destination Control Statement.* You may be required to enter an appropriate Destination Control Statement on commercial documents in accordance with Destination Control Statement requirements of § 758.6 of the EAR.
( f ) *Recordkeeping.* Records of transactions involving exports under any of the License Exceptions must be maintained in accordance with the recordkeeping requirements of part 762 of the EAR.
[61 FR 12768, Mar. 25, 1996, as amended at 61 FR 64274, Dec. 4, 1996; 62 FR 25457, May 9, 1997; 65 FR 42568, July 10, 2000; 66 FR 36680, July 12, 2001; 66 FR 42109, Aug. 10, 2001; 68 FR 50472, Aug. 21, 2003; 78 FR 22708, Apr. 16, 2013; 79 FR 4615, Jan. 29, 2014]
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Deep Down, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned,
Eugene L Butler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)                       The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)                       The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By: /s/ EUGENE L.
BUTLER


Eugene L.
Butler


Chief
Financial Officer


March 31,
2008
CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the accompanying quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Colombia
      Goldfields Ltd. for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, I certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:





|(1) | the
              quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Colombia Goldfields Ltd. for the
              quarter ended June 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of
              Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) | the
              information contained in the quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
              quarter ended June 30, 2007, fairly presents in all material respects,
              the
              financial condition and results of operations of Colombia Goldfields
              Ltd..
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




By:
            /s/
                J. Randall MartinName:
            J.
                Randall MartinTitle:
            Principal
                Executive Officer and DirectorDate:
            August
                14, 2007By:
            /s/
                James KoppersonName:
            James
                KoppersonTitle:
            Principal
                Financial OfficerDate:
            August
                14, 2007
§ 997.24 Gaps identification. ( a ) To become certified, an RCOS must identify gaps in observation coverage needs for capital improvements of Federal assets and non-Federal assets of the System, or other recommendations to assist in the development of annual and long-terms plans and transmit such information to the Interagency Ocean Observing Committee via the Program Office.
( b ) The application shall: ( 1 ) Document that the RCOS's asset inventory contains up-to-date information. This could be demonstrated by a database or portal accessible for public viewing and capable of producing a regional summary of observing capacity;
( 2 ) Provide a regional Build-out Plan that identifies the regional priorities for products and services, based on its understanding of regional needs, and a description of the integrated system (observations, modeling, data management, product development, outreach, and R&D). The RCOS shall review and update the Build-out Plan at least once every five years; and
( 3 ) Document the priority regional gaps in observation coverage needs, as determined by an analysis of the RICE asset inventory and Build-out Plan. The RCOS shall review and update the analysis of priority regional gaps in observation coverage needs at least once every five years.
#### § 1500.210 Responsibility.

The provisions of these regulations (16 CFR subchapter C of chapter II) with respect to the doing of any act shall be applicable also to the causing of such act to be done.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of
ADA-ES, Inc. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ADA-ES, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael D. Durham,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Michael D. Durham
---------------------
Name: Michael D. Durham
Title: President
Date: August 7, 2006


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ADA-ES, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark H. McKinnies,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Mark H. McKinnies
---------------------
Name: Mark H. McKinnies
Title: Senior VP & CFO
Date: August 7, 2006
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

769 KA 11-00399 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, FAHEY, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V ORDER
JEFFREY MASTERSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JAMES ECKERT OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (NANCY GILLIGAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Monroe County Court (Frank P. Geraci, Jr., J.), entered January 24, 2011. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: June 8, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
#### In the Matter of 11 West 42nd Street, Inc., Appellant. Elzee Realty Corp., Respondent.

*644Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# Draft Regulatory Basis for Cyber Security at Fuel Cycle Facilities.

Accession Number: ML15198A019

Date Released: Thursday, August 27, 2015

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML15198A017 - Concurrence Page for Draft Regulatory Basis- Cyber Security at Fuel Cycle Facilities. (1 page(s), 8/27/2015)
    - ML15198A021 - Draft Regulatory Basis - Cyber Security at Fuel Cycle Facilities. (64 page(s), 8/27/2015)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
________________________________________________________________________ 

TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 21-923.1 

NUCLEAR ENERGY 

Safety 

Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and FINLAND 

Extending the Arrangement of September 28, 2016 

Signed at Vienna September 23, 2021 

Entered into force September 23, 2021 

With effect from September 28, 2021 
NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.”
AGREEMENT EXTENDING THE ARRANGEMENT 

BETWEEN 

THE UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

AND 

THE FINNISH RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY 

FOR THE EXCHANGE OF TECHNICAL INFORMATION AND 

COOPERATION IN NUCLEAR SAFETY MATTERS 

The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Finnish Radiation and Nuclear 

Safety Authority, the two together hereinafter referred to as "the Parties"; 

Recalling the Arrangement between the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the 

Finnish Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority for the Exchange of Technical Information and 

Cooperation in Nuclear Safety Matters, signed at Vienna, Austria, on September 28, 2016 (the 

"Arrangement"); 

Guided by their desire to continue cooperation under the Arrangement; and 

Recalling that, as envisaged by Section IV.D of the Arrangement, the Arrangement may be 

extended by written agreement of the Parties, 

Hereby agree as follows: 

1. The Arrangement shall be extended for a period of 1 year, from September 28, 2021 , to 

September 28, 2022. 
--------

--------

2. This Agreement shall enter into force upon the signature of both Parties with effect from 

September 28, 2021. 

DONE, in duplicate, in the English language. 

FOR THE UNITED STATES 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION: 

~T~ Christopher T. Hanson 

Chairman 

Date: 2-3 I q \ 20 2...\ 

Place: \/ 

• (_ N ~ ~ 

FOR THE FINNISH RADIATION 

AND NUCLEAR SAFETY 

AUTHORITY: 

Petteri 

~ Tiippana 

Director General 

Date: ~ °1. 2.d?...( 

Vle--,.._,.._A_ Place:
##### 



Exhibit 10.32
 ENDEAVOUR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT
 Agreement Company Grantee Appendix A
 Common Stock
  1. Grant of Common Stock Restricted Shares Board Committee
 2. Transfer Restrictions; Vesting .
 (a) Generally. Transfer




---



##### 



(b) Dividends, etc.
 3. Vesting on Change in Control Change in Control
      4. Forfeiture.
 (a) Termination of Employment
 2




---



##### 



(b) Forfeited Shares
 5. Issuance of Certificate.
 (a)
    3




---



##### 



(b)
 6. Tax Requirements .
 (a) Tax Withholding
 (b) Share Withholding
 7. Miscellaneous .
 (a) Certain Transfers Void
 (b) No Fractional Shares
 (c) Not an Employment Agreement
 (d) Investment Representation.
 Securities Act
 4




---



##### 



(e) Dispute Resolution
 Arbitration
  AAA
  5




---



##### 



Emergency Relief
 (f) Notices
 (g) Amendment and Waiver
 6




---



##### 



(h) Independent Legal and Tax Advice
 (i) Governing Law and Severability
 (j) Successors and Assigns
 (k) Community Property
 (l) Entire Agreement
 [Signature page follows]
 7




---



##### 



COMPANY:ENDEAVOUR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATIONBy: /s/ Don
TeagueName: Don TeagueTitle: Executive Vice President and
General Counsel
 Address:
    
    Endeavour International Corporation
1000 Main Street, Suite 3300
Houston, Texas 77002
Telecopy No.: (713) 307-8793
Attention: Secretary
 GRANTEE:/s/ John Williams 8




---



##### 



APPENDIX A TO  RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT
 Grantees Name:
    
    John G. Williams
 Number ofGrant Date:
    
    Restricted Shares Granted10/01/2007
    
    
    400,000
 Vesting Schedule:Date
    
    Number of Shares Vested10/01/2008
    
    
    133,33310/01/2009
    
    
    133,33310/01/2010
    
    
    133,334
§ 971.501 Resource assessment, recovery plan, and logical mining unit. ( a ) The applicant must submit with the application a resource assessment to provide a basis for assessing the area applied for. This assessment must include a discussion of mineable and unmineable areas, taking into account nodule grade, nodule concentration, and other factors such as seafloor topography. These areas may be delineated graphically. The resources in the area must be described in relation to the applicant's production requirements, operating period, and recovery efficiency in order to justify the area applied for.
( b ) The applicant shall select the size and location of the area of the recovery plan, which area shall be approved unless the Administrator finds that, among other considerations (see § 971.301(a)), the area is not a logical mining unit. In the case of a commercial recovery permit, a logical mining unit is an area of the deep seabed: ( 1 ) In which hard mineral resources can be recovered in sufficient quantities to satisfy the permittee's estimated production requirements over the initial 20-year term of the permit in an efficient, economical, and orderly manner with due regard for conservation and protection of the environment, taking into consideration the resource data, other relevant physical and environmental characteristics, and the state of the technology of the applicant set out in the recovery plan;
( 2 ) Which is not larger than necessary to satisfy the permittee's estimated production requirements over the initial 20-year term of the permit; and
( 3 ) In relation to which the permittee's estimated production requirements are not found by the Administrator to be unreasonable.
( c ) Approval by the Administrator of a proposed logical mining unit will be based on a case-by-case review of each application. The area need not consist of contiguous segments, as long as each segment would be efficiently mineable and the total proposed area constitutes a logical mining unit.
( d ) In describing the area, the applicant must present the geodetic coordinates of the points defining the boundaries referred to the World Geodetic System (WGS) Datum. A boundary between points must be a geodesic. If grid coordinates are desired, the Universal Transverse Mercator Grid System must be used.
1 Eric H. Holder, Jr. has been appointed to serve as Attorney General of the United States, and is substituted as responde nt pursuant to Federa l Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c). 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 08-2205

___________ Jose Rolando Aguilar-Canas; Evelyn * Elizabeth Montoya-Palacios, * * Petitioners, * * Petition for Review of v. * an Order of the Board * of Immigration Appeals. Eric H. Holder, Jr., 1 Attorney General, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Respondent. *

___________ Submitted: September 8, 2009 Filed: September 11, 2009

___________ Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Jose Rolando Aguilar-Canas and Evelyn Elizabeth Montoya-Palacios (petitioners), natives and citizens of El Salv ador, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), whic h summarily affirmedthe decision of an immigration judge (IJ), denyi ng their request for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). Petitioners challenge the denial-2- of withholding of removal and CAT relief. Upon careful review, seeEta-Ndu v. Gonzales , 411 F.3d 977, 982-83 (8th Cir. 2005) (s tating the deferen tial standard of review for denial of withholdi ng of removal); Chege v. Holder , 309 F. App’x 78, 79 n.2 (8th Cir. 2009) (per curiam) (holdi ng the petitioner’s failu re to address her Convention Against Torture claim in her brie f amounted to waiver of such claim), we deny the petition.
For the reasons explained by the IJ, pe titioners failed to show that the gang violence they suffered in El Salvador was attributable either to a political opinion that they held or to their membership in a particular social group; thus, they similarly failed to show it was more likely than not that they would be persecuted on account of any such protected ground if re turned to El Salvador. See Davila-Mejia v. Mukasey , 531 F.3d 624, 628 (8th Cir. 2008) (defini ng membership in particular social group); Mohamed v. Ashcroft , 396 F.3d 999, 1003 (8th Cir. 2005) (explaining that harm arising from general conditions such as anarchy, civil war, or mob violence will not ordinarily support claim of persecution).
We deny the petition.

______________________________
You have tried to reach a page on www.hcfa.gov, the retired website of the Health Care Financing Administration.

When HCFA was renamed the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) on June 14, 2001, we immediately began building a new, user-friendly website to support the mission and vision of the Agency.

Visit the cms.hhs.gov homepage now at http://cms.hhs.gov.
#### Nicholas Nixon, Respondent, v. New York Railways Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present— Clarke, P. J., Scott, Smith, Page and Davis, JJ.
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3556 

AN ACT 

To designate the new United States courthouse in Buffalo, 

New York, as the ‘‘Robert H. Jackson United States 

Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3556 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The United States courthouse at 2 Niagara Square, 

3 Buffalo, New York shall be known and designated as the 

4 ‘‘Robert H. Jackson United States Courthouse’’. 

5 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

6 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

7 paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

8 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed 

9 to be a reference to the ‘‘Robert H. Jackson United States 

10 Courthouse’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 23, 2012. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3556 

AN ACT 

To designate the new United States courthouse in 

United States Courthouse’’. Buffalo, New York, as the ‘‘Robert H. Jackson
### §12714. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–99, title IV, §404(a), Jan. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 44

Section, Pub. L. 101–625, title IX, §957, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4422, related to maximum annual limitation on rent increases resulting from employment.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 104–99, title IV, §404(a), Jan. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 44, provided in part that this section is repealed retroactive to Nov. 28, 1990, and shall be of no effect.

#### Economic Independence

Pub. L. 102–550, title IX, §923, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3884, which provided that Secretary of Housing and Urban Development was to immediately implement section 12714 of this title and that other Federal agencies authorized to assist low-income families were to take similar steps to encourage economic independence and the accumulation of assets, was repealed retroactive to Oct. 28, 1992, by Pub. L. 104–99, title IV, §404(b), Jan. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 44, which further provided that section 923 of Pub. L. 102–550 was to be of no effect.
#### § 301.11 Fictitious or non-existing animal designations prohibited.

No trade names, coined names, nor other names or words descriptive of a fur as being the fur of an animal which is in fact fictitious or non-existent shall be used in labeling, invoicing or advertising of a fur or fur product.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of E. Bruce Johnson, Deceased. Eleanor Muelberger, Appellant; Genevieve Johnson, Respondent.

Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ. [See *post,*pp. 944, 961.]