alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §12701. National housing goal

The Congress affirms the national goal that every American family be able to afford a decent home in a suitable environment.

(Pub. L. 101–625, title I, §101, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4085.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title of 2003 Amendment

Pub. L. 108–186, title I, §101, Dec. 16, 2003, 117 Stat. 2685, provided that: "This title [amending part E of subchapter II of this chapter] may be cited as the 'American Dream Downpayment Act'."

#### Short Title of 2000 Amendment

Pub. L. 106–569, title I, §101, Dec. 27, 2000, 114 Stat. 2946, provided that: "This title [amending sections 5307, 12705c, and 12705d of this title] may be cited as the 'Housing Affordability Barrier Removal Act of 2000'."

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 101–625, §1(a), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4079, provided that: "This Act [see Tables for classification] may be cited as the 'Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act'."

Pub. L. 101–625, title II, §201, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4094, provided that: "This title [enacting subchapter II of this chapter, amending section 1437f of this title, and repealing sections 1437o and 1452b of this title, section 1706e of Title 12, Banks and Banking, and provisions set out as a note under section 1715l of Title 12] may be cited as the 'HOME Investment Partnerships Act'."

Pub. L. 101–625, title III, §301, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4129, provided that: "This subtitle [subtitle A (§§301–310) of title III of Pub. L. 101–625, enacting subchapter III of this chapter] may be cited as the 'National Homeownership Trust Act'."

#### Millennial Housing Commission

Pub. L. 107–73, title II, Nov. 26, 2001, 115 Stat. 671, provided for necessary expenses of the Millennial Housing Commission and set a revised final report due date of May 30, 2002, and Commission termination date of Aug. 30, 2002.

Pub. L. 106–74, title II, §206, Oct. 20, 1999, 113 Stat. 1070, as amended by Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(4) [div. B, title X, §1001], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–310, established the Millennial Housing Commission to study and report back to Congress on improving Federal housing policy.

#### Commission on Affordable Housing and Health Facility Needs for Seniors in the 21st Century

Pub. L. 107–73, title II, Nov. 26, 2001, 115 Stat. 671, provided for necessary expenses of the Commission on Affordable Housing and Health Facility Needs for Seniors in the 21st Century and set a revised final report due date of June 30, 2002, and Commission termination date of Sept. 30, 2002.

Pub. L. 106–74, title V, §525, Oct. 20, 1999, 113 Stat. 1106, as amended by Pub. L. 106–377, §1(a)(1) [title II, §230], Oct. 27, 2000, 114 Stat. 1441, 1441A–31, established the Commission on Affordable Housing and Health Facility Needs for Seniors in the 21st Century to study and report back to Congress on housing and health care facility needs for seniors.
August 14, 2015 

MEMORANDUM TO: Chairman Burns 

FROM: Andrew L. Bates, Acting Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: COMSGB-15-0003 – COMMISSION INVOLVEMENT IN EARLY 

STAGES OF RULEMAKING 

This memorandum is to inform you that all Commissioners have concurred in your proposal for 

increased Commission involvement early in the rulemaking process. The attached SRM 

provides staff direction on this issue. 

This completes action on COMSGB-15-0003. 

Enclosure: 

As stated 

cc: Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 EDO 

 OGC 

 
 

August 14, 2015 

MEMORANDUM TO: Mark A. Satorius 

 Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Andrew L. Bates, Acting Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS – COMSGB-15-0003 – COMMISSION 

INVOLVEMENT IN EARLY STAGES OF RULEMAKING 

The staff should provide the Commission a proposed plan for increasing the Commission’s 

involvement in the rulemaking process with the objective of ensuring early Commission 

engagement before significant resources are expended. The proposed plan should include, at a 

minimum, a recommendation for possibly reintroducing Commission approval of the Rulemaking 

Activity Plan; assessing and addressing any lessons learned from the past changes to 

Commission engagement in the rulemaking process; and a recommendation for reconsideration 

of the Commission’s 2006 direction with respect to the approval of rulemaking plans and the 

reviews of proposed rules by the Committee to Review Generic Requirements and the Advisory 

Committee on Reactor Safeguards. The staff should also analyze whether amendments to the 

charter of the Committee to Review Generic Requirements to alter its role in the agency’s 

rulemaking process have the potential to better inform the agency’s allocation of resources and 

prioritization of activities. The staff analysis should also consider the option of requiring the 

submission of a brief notation vote paper to the Commission seeking authorization to initiate any 

non-routine rulemaking. 

The staff shall provide the Commission with a notation vote paper with the staff’s evaluation and 

recommendations within 60 days of the Staff Requirements Memorandum. 

 (EDO) (SECY Suspense: October, 13, 2015) 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA 

 OPA 

 Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR
**
**Exhibit 13.1**

**Certification by the Principal Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of AMTD International Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-Ffor the year ended December 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Calvin Choi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

(1)    The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)    Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date:April 30, 2020 

 
By: 
  /s/ Calvin Choi
   Name: Calvin Choi   Title: Chief Executive Officer
 
**
### SUBCHAPTER VII—ENERGY SAVINGS PERFORMANCE CONTRACTS
§ 1031.2 Background. ( a ) Congress enacted the Consumer Product Safety Act in 1972 to protect consumers against unreasonable risks of injury associated with consumer products. In order to achieve that goal, Congress established the Consumer Product Safety Commission as an independent regulatory agency and granted it broad authority to promulgate mandatory safety standards for consumer products as a necessary alternative to industry self regulation.
( b ) In 1981, the Congress amended the Consumer Product Safety Act, the Federal Hazardous Substances Act, and the Flammable Fabrics Act, to require the Commission to rely on voluntary standards rather than promulgate a mandatory standard when voluntary standards would eliminate or adequately reduce the risk of injury addressed and it is likely that there will be substantial compliance with the voluntary standards. (15 U.S.C. 2056(b), 15 U.S.C. 1262(g)(2), 15 U.S.C. 1193(h)(2)). The 1981 Amendments also require the Commission, after any notice or advance notice of proposed rulemaking, to provide technical and administrative assistance to persons or groups who propose to develop or modify an appropriate voluntary standard. (15 U.S.C. 2054(a)(3)). Additionally, the amendments encourage the Commission to provide technical and administrative assistance to groups developing product safety standards and test methods, taking into account Commission resources and priorities (15 U.S.C. 2054(a)(4)). Although the Commission is required to provide assistance to such groups, it may determine the level of assistance in accordance with the level of its own administrative and technical resources and in accordance with its assessment of the likelihood that the groups being assisted will successfully develop a voluntary standard that will preclude the need for a mandatory standard.
( c ) In 1990, Congress passed the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA), amending section 15(b) of the CPSA to require that manufacturers, distributors, and retailers notify the Commission about products that fail to comply with an applicable voluntary standard upon which the Commission has relied under section 9 of the CPSA. CPSIA also amended section 9(b)(2) of the CPSA to require that the CPSC afford interested persons the opportunity to comment regarding any voluntary standard prior to CPSC termination and reliance.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 362 

To redesignate the Federal building and United States Courthouse located 

at 200 East Wall Street in Midland, Texas, as the ‘‘George H. W. 

Bush and George W. Bush United States Courthouse and George Mahon 

Federal Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 20, 2011 

Mr. CONAWAY (for himself, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. 

HALL, Mr. BARTON of Texas, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. BRADY of Texas, 

Mr. MCCAUL, Ms. GRANGER, Mr. THORNBERRY, Mr. PAUL, Mr. 

HINOJOSA, Mr. FLORES, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. 

OLSON, Mr. CANSECO, Mr. MARCHANT, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. 

FARENTHOLD, Mr. CARTER, and Mr. SESSIONS) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To redesignate the Federal building and United States 

Courthouse located at 200 East Wall Street in Midland, 

Texas, as the ‘‘George H. W. Bush and George W. 

Bush United States Courthouse and George Mahon Federal Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 362 IH

1 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION. 

2 The Federal building and United States Courthouse 

3 located at 200 East Wall Street in Midland, Texas, known 

4 as the George Mahon Federal Building, shall be known 

5 and designated as the ‘‘George H. W. Bush and George 

6 W. Bush United States Courthouse and George Mahon 

7 Federal Building’’. 

8 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

9 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

10 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal 

11 building and United States Courthouse referred to in sec12 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘George 

13 H. W. Bush and George W. Bush United States Court14 house and George Mahon Federal Building’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99(c)

Household Finance Corporation
Household Receivables Funding, Inc. III
Household Credit Card Master Note Trust I, Series 2001-2


Original Class A Principal                     500,000,000.00
Number of Class A Bonds (000's)                    500,000.00
Original Class B Principal                      43,807,000.00
Number of Class B Bonds (000's)                     43,807.00


Distribution Date                                                   2002 Totals

CLASS A
-------
Class A Principal Distributions                                             0.00
Class A Interest                                                    9,535,160.28


CLASS B
-------
Class B Principal Distributions                                             0.00
Class B Interest                                                      948,362.57
#### John THOMPSON, Movant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

March 23, 1948.

C. F. See, Jr., and Kit C. Elswick for movant.

A. E. Funk, Attorney General, and A. E. Funk, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal denied; Judgment affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. 2004N-0062]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “Color Additive Certification Requests and Recordkeeping” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Robbins, Office of Management Programs (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1223.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of July 19, 2004 (69 FR 42998), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under  44 U.S.C. 3507.  An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.  OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0216.  The approval expires on November 30, 2007.  A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at                     *http://www.fda.gov/​ohrms/​dockets*.                

Dated: November 19, 2004.

Jeffrey Shuren,

Assistant Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-26441 Filed 11-30-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
### Part A—Research, Development, Demonstration, and Commercial Application
### §11134. Form of reporting

#### (a) Timing and form

The information required to be reported under sections 11131, 11132(a), and 11133 of this title shall be reported regularly (but not less often than monthly) and in such form and manner as the Secretary prescribes. Such information shall first be required to be reported on a date (not later than one year after November 14, 1986) specified by the Secretary.

#### (b) To whom reported

The information required to be reported under sections 11131, 11132(a), and 11133(b) of this title shall be reported to the Secretary, or, in the Secretary's discretion, to an appropriate private or public agency which has made suitable arrangements with the Secretary with respect to receipt, storage, protection of confidentiality, and dissemination of the information under this subchapter.

#### (c) Reporting to State licensing boards

#### (1) Malpractice payments

Information required to be reported under section 11131 of this title shall also be reported to the appropriate State licensing board (or boards) in the State in which the medical malpractice claim arose.

#### (2) Reporting to other licensing boards

Information required to be reported under section 11133(b) of this title shall also be reported to the appropriate State licensing board in the State in which the health care entity is located if it is not otherwise reported to such board under subsection (b).

(Pub. L. 99–660, title IV, §424, Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3790.)
#### Multiple Trading Corporation et al., Respondents, v. Ernest M. Garbe, Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion granted upon the ground that the complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Bergan, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Salomon Smith Barney Orion Futures Fund L.P. (the ‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Jerry Pascucci, President and Director of Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

|                                                                    |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/    Jerry Pascucci                          |
| Jerry PascucciCitigroup Managed Futures LLC President and Director |

August 14, 2007

----
§ 1204.14 Certification tests. ( a ) *General.* As explained in § 1204.11 of this subpart, certificates of compliance required by section 14(a) of the act must be based on either a test of each item or on a reasonable testing program.
( b ) *Tests of each item.* If the certificate is based on tests of each item, the tests may be either those prescribed by the standard or any other test procedure that will determine that the item tested will comply with the standard.
( c ) *Reasonable testing programs* — ( 1 ) *Requirements.* ( i ) A reasonable testing program for a particular model of CB antennas is one which demonstrates with a high degree of assurance that all the antennas of that model will meet all requirements of the standard. Manufacturers and importers shall determine the types and frequency of testing for their own reasonable testing programs. A reasonable testing program which does not test each item produced should be sufficiently stringent that any variations in production, etc., over the production interval would not cause any antenna to fail if tested according to the requirements of the standard.
( ii ) All reasonable testing programs shall include qualification tests, which must be performed on one or more samples of the CB antennas representative of each model produced, or to be produced, to demonstrate that the product is capable of passing the tests prescribed by the standard and shall also include production tests, which must be performed during appropriate production intervals as long as the product is being manufactured.
( iii ) Corrective action and/or additional testing must be performed whenever certification tests of samples of the product give results that do not provide a high degree of assurance that all antennas manufactured during the applicable production interval will pass the tests of the standard.
( 2 ) *Testing by third parties.* At the option of the manufacturer or importer, some or all of the testing of each item or of the reasonable testing program may be performed by a commercial testing laboratory or other third party. However, the manufacturer or importer is responsible for ensuring that all certification testing has been properly performed with passing or acceptable results and for maintaining all records of such tests in accordance with § 1204.17 of this subpart.
##### 



EXHIBIT 12.1
 ARDEN REALY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS)
 ARDEN REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIPFor the Years Ended December 31,2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2001Earnings Available to Cover Fixed Charges:Net income
    
    
    66,826
    
    
    
    79,791
    
    
    
    65,994
    
    
    
    77,663
    
    
    
    106,257Add:Interest Expense(1)
    
    
    98,429
    
    
    
    89,515
    
    
    
    93,767
    
    
    
    88,516
    
    
    
    84,195Total Earnings Available to Cover Fixed Charges
    
    
    165,255
    
    
    
    169,306
    
    
    
    159,761
    
    
    
    166,179
    
    
    
    190,452Fixed Charges:Interest Expense
    
    
    98,429
    
    
    
    89,515
    
    
    
    93,767
    
    
    
    88,516
    
    
    
    84,195Interest Capitalized
    
    
    805
    
    
    
    936
    
    
    
    2,496
    
    
    
    5,646
    
    
    
    9,095
    (3)Preferred Distributions
    
    
    
    
    
    
    4,309
    (2)
    
    
    4,312
    
    
    
    4,312
    
    
    
    4,312Total Fixed Charges
    
    
    99,234
    
    
    
    94,760
    
    
    
    100,575
    
    
    
    98,474
    
    
    
    97,602Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    1.67x
    
    
    
    1.79x
    
    
    
    1.59x
    
    
    
    1.69x
    
    
    
    1.95x
 
 (1)
    
    Includes interest expense for properties classified as part of discontinued operations.(2)
    
    Includes approximately $1.1 million of original issuance costs written off in conjunction
with the redemption of the Preferred OP units on September 28, 2004.(3)
    
    Includes approximately $2.5 million of interest capitalized on an office property that was
classified as part of discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2001.
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-08-00209-CR

______________________________

FELIPE RUBIO GASPAR, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

 

On Appeal from the 336th Judicial District Court

Fannin County, Texas

Trial Court No. 22481

 

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Felipe Rubio Gaspar appeals. We have received a motion from counsel asking us to extend

the time for filing his notice of appeal. He states that Gaspar was convicted June 12, 2008, that a

motion for new trial and arrest of judgment was filed, and that appellate counsel was appointed.

Counsel states that he asked the district clerk whether a notice of appeal had been filed and was told

that it had been. However, on October 15, 2008, counsel discovered that no notice of appeal had

been filed, and he filed a notice of appeal October 16, 2008.

With conviction and sentencing occurring June 12, 2008, and with a motion for new trial

being timely filed, the notice of appeal was due to be filed no more than ninety days later, on

September 10, 2008. The rule also provides a fifteen-day grace period, which expired September 25,

2008. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2. The information before this Court reflects that no notice of appeal

or motion to extend time was filed until over twenty days after the expiration of the grace period. 

Our jurisdiction over an appeal is circumscribed by statute and rule, and we are not permitted

to engage in actions that will enlarge that jurisdiction. Without a timely filed notice of appeal, this

Court is without jurisdiction. Rodarte v. State, 860 S.W.2d 108 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993);see Slaton

v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). Further, courts of appeals may not employ Rule 2

of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure to suspend appellate time limits and thus expand our

jurisdiction. Garza v. State, 896 S.W.2d 192 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); see TEX. R. APP. P. 2.
We are relying on counsel's statements concerning the timing of the events giving rise to the 1

notice of appeal. The relief sought must be granted by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.

3

Therefore, based on the information before us, we must conclude the notice of appeal is

untimely.1

We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Bailey C. Moseley

Justice

Date Submitted: October 22, 2008

Date Decided: October 23, 2008

Do Not Publish