alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
19–008

108TH CONGRESS REPORT " HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ! 1st Session 108–209

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 2691, DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2004

JULY 15, 2003.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 319]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 319, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 2691, the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations Act 

for fiscal year 2004, under an open rule. The rule provides one hour 

of general debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman 

and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. 

The rule waives all points of order against consideration of the bill. 

Under the rules of the House the bill shall be read for amendment by paragraph. The rule waives points of order against provisions in the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI (prohibiting unauthorized appropriations or legislative provisions in an 

appropriations bill), except as specified in the resolution. The rule 

further waives points of order against amendments for failure to 

comply with clause 2(e) of rule XXI (prohibiting designated emergencies in reported appropriation bills). The rule authorizes the 

Chair to accord priority in recognition to Members who have preprinted their amendments in the Congressional Record. 

Finally, the rule provides one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

The waiver of clause 2 of rule XXI (prohibiting unauthorized appropriations or legislative provisions in an appropriations bill) is 

2

needed because there are numerous legislative provisions included 

in the bill.

Æ
**Exhibit
      32.2**











**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of AIDA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. a Nevada
      corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-QSB/A for the annual period ending June
      30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,
      Hui Lin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my
      knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/ Hui
              LinHui LinChief Financial OfficerDate:August 14,
              2006
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECURITIES ACT RULES 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14(a)

I, Jon E. Kirchner, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of DTS, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: May 9, 2011By:

/s/ JON E. KIRCHNER Jon E. Kirchner Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
### §11101. Findings

The Congress finds the following:

(1) The increasing occurrence of medical malpractice and the need to improve the quality of medical care have become nationwide problems that warrant greater efforts than those that can be undertaken by any individual State.

(2) There is a national need to restrict the ability of incompetent physicians to move from State to State without disclosure or discovery of the physician's previous damaging or incompetent performance.

(3) This nationwide problem can be remedied through effective professional peer review.

(4) The threat of private money damage liability under Federal laws, including treble damage liability under Federal antitrust law, unreasonably discourages physicians from participating in effective professional peer review.

(5) There is an overriding national need to provide incentive and protection for physicians engaging in effective professional peer review.

(Pub. L. 99–660, title IV, §402, Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3784.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 99–660, title IV, §401, Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3784, provided that: "This title [enacting this chapter and provisions set out as a note under section 11111 of this title] may be cited as the 'Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986'."
§ 1117.5 Information that must be reported and to whom. ( a ) Reports shall be directed to the Division of Corrective Actions, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland 20815 (Mailing Address: Washington, D.C. 20207) (Phone: 301-504-0608, facsimile: 301-504-0359).
( b ) Subject firms must report as much of the following information as is known when the report is made: ( 1 ) The name, address, and title of the person submitting the report to the Commission,
( 2 ) The name and address of the subject firm,
( 3 ) The name and address of the child who choked and the person(s) who notified the subject firm of the choking incident,
( 4 ) Identification of the product involved including the date(s) of distribution, model or style number, a description of the product (including any labeling and warnings), a description of the marble, small ball, latex balloon or other small part involved, and pictures or sample if available,
( 5 ) A description of the choking incident and any injuries that resulted or medical treatment that was necessary,
( 6 ) Copies of any information obtained about the choking incident,
( 7 ) Any information about changes made to the product or its labeling or warnings with the intention of avoiding such choking incidents, including, but not limited to, the date(s) of the change and its implementation, and a description of the change. Copies of any engineering drawings or product and label samples that depict the change(s).
( 8 ) The details of any public notice or other corrective action planned by the firm,
( 9 ) Such other information as appropriate.
( c ) Retailers or distributors should supply as much of the information required in paragraph (b) of this section as is available to them but are not required to obtain information about product design changes or recall activities from the product manufacturer.
( d ) Within ten days of their initial report, subject firms must supplement their reports to supply any of the information required by paragraph (b) of this section that was not available at the time of the initial report.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

I, Chang H. Ahn, Chief Executive Officer of Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter
         ended March 31, 2005 as filed on the date hereof with the Securities
         and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934, as amended; and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.


Date: May 23, 2005


/s/ Chang H. Ahn
-------------------------
Chang H. Ahn
Chief Executive Officer
#### § 239.3 “Satisfaction Guarantees” and similar representations in advertising; disclosure in advertising that mentions “satisfaction guarantees” or similar representations.

(a) A seller or manufacturer should use the terms “Satisfaction Guarantee,” “Money Back Guarantee,” “Free Trial Offer,” or similar representations in advertising only if the seller or manufacturer, as the case may be, refunds the full purchase price of the advertised product at the purchaser's request.

(b) An advertisement that mentions a “Satisfaction Guarantee” or a similar representation should disclose, with such clarity and prominence as will be noticed and understood by prospective purchasers, any material limitations or conditions that apply to the “Satisfaction Guarantee” or similar representation.

# Examples:

These examples are for both print and broadcast advertising. These examples are illustrative, not exhaustive.

# Example A:

(In an advertisement mentioning a satisfaction guarantee that is conditioned upon return of the unused portion within 30 days) “We guarantee your satisfaction. If not completely satisfied with Acme Spot Remover, return the unused portion within 30 days for a full refund.”

# Example B:

(In an advertisement mentioning a money back guarantee that is conditioned upon return of the product in its original packaging) “Money Back Guarantee! Just return the ABC watch in its original package and ABC will fully refund your money.”
**~** ..\

In The Matter Of: 

### SERVED: May 10, 2016
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC

DocketNo. FAA-2014-0115 Redemption Air, Inc. ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2013AL030106 Respondent


### ORDER SETTING PREHEARING CONFERENCE
OnApril 4, 2016, the undersignedjudge issued an Order Directing the Parties to Meet and Confer Regarding Litigation and Scheduling Issues in the above captioned case. On May 4, 2016, the parties submitted ajointreport to the undersignedjudge reporting on the results oftheir meeting. In the report, the parties suggested a telephonic prehearing · conference be held after July 15, 2016.
Pursuantto 14 C.F.R. § 13.205(a)(1) and (7), it is hereby 

### ORDERED: 1. The parties shall appear by telephone for a prehearing conference withthe undersigned judge onJuly 20,2016 at 3pm Eastern time. 2. The parties shall access the conference by dialing telephone number 888-204-5984 and then inputting access code 6392406 whenprompted. 3. During the conference, the parties shall be prepared to discuss venue, the issues in dispute, the proposed litigation schedule, the status ofany settlement negotiations, and any otherrelated matters.

Attachment: Service List 

# ~WALD Administrative LawJudge -

**-~**SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal AviationAdministration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1

Brent R. Cole, Respondent's Counsel Law Office ofBrent R. Cole, P.C. 821 N Street, Suite 208 Anchorage AK 99501 TEL: 907-277-8001 FAX: 907-277-8002 Glenn H. Brown, Complainant's Counsel Federal Aviation Administration Enforcement Division, Western Team 222 West 7th Avenue, #14 Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 TEL: 907-271-5271 FAX: 907-271-2800 ONE COPY

The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-0115 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was byU.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
May 14, 2013

*** FOR THE RECORD ***

The Atomic Safety and Licensing Board’s Decision 

in the San Onofre Confirmatory Action Letter Adjudication

In March 2012, the NRC issued to Southern California Edison Company a Confirmatory Action 

Letter in which the NRC confirmed its understanding of several actions Edison would take with respect 

to its steam generators before restarting San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3. Shortly 

thereafter, petitioner Friends of the Earth filed a hearing request that challenged aspects of the 

Confirmatory Action Letter. As part of its hearing request, Friends of the Earth had argued that the 

Confirmatory Action Letter process is a de facto license amendment that would be subject to a hearing 

opportunity under the Atomic Energy Act (AEA). Friends of the Earth also proposed at that time a 

related contention, arguing that San Onofre should not be allowed to restart without a license 

amendment and associated adjudicatory hearing.

Late last year, the Commission referred a portion of Friends of the Earth’s hearing request to the 

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, directing the Panel to consider whether: (1) the 

Confirmatory Action Letter constitutes a de facto license amendment that would be subject to a hearing 

opportunity under the AEA; and, if so, (2) whether Friends of the Earth’s hearing request satisfies the 

NRC’s standing and contention admissibility requirements.

On Monday, May 13, a three-judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board issued a decision 

resolving the issues referred to it by the Commission. In particular, the Board held that the 

Confirmatory Action Letter process in this case constitutes a de facto license amendment proceeding 

that is subject to a hearing opportunity. The Board also dismissed Friends of the Earth’s contention. 

The contention sought a hearing opportunity which the Board found to be appropriate. The Board 

therefore found Friends of the Earth’s contention to be “moot,” since the Board’s resolution of the first 

issue gave Friends of the Earth their requested relief.

The NRC is now considering the ramifications of the Board’s newly-issued decision, and the 

path forward. Appeals of the Board’s decision may be filed with the Commission within 25 days (by 

June 7, 2013), pursuant to the agency’s rules of practice in 10 C.F.R. § 2.341. Also under the agency’s 

rules, the Commission itself may review the decision on its own motion.
EXHIBIT 32

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Nelnet Education Loan
Funding, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), we certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        1.      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.



Date:  November 15, 2004                   By:   /s/ Terry J. Heimes
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Name: Terry J. Heimes
                                           Title:  President
                                                   (Chief Executive Officer)

                                           By:   /s/ James D. Kruger
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Name: James D. Kruger
                                           Title:  Secretary and Treasurer
                                                   (Principal Financial Officer)
### §1320b–18. Repealed. Pub. L. 108–203, title II, §210(b)(3), Mar. 2, 2004, 118 Stat. 517

Section, act Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XI, §1147A, as added Pub. L. 106–169, title II, §251(b)(8), Dec. 14, 1999, 113 Stat. 1856, related to recovery of social security benefit overpayments from subchapter VIII benefits. See section 1320b–17 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Mar. 2, 2004, and effective with respect to overpayments under subchapters II, VIII, and XVI of this chapter that are outstanding on or after such date, see section 210(c) of Pub. L. 108–203, set out as an Effective Date of 2004 Amendment note under section 404 of this title.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-18-0000012

21-FEB-2019

07:59 AM
#### § 971.420 Resource conservation requirements.

For the purpose of conservation of natural resources, each permit issued under this part will contain, as needed, TCRs which have due regard for the prevention of waste and the future opportunity for the commercial recovery of the unrecovered balance of the hard mineral resources in the recovery area. The Administrator will establish these requirements pursuant to § 971.502.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Dominick Pope, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Tranquility, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:

(a)         designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)         designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements, for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)         evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)         Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)         all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)         any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 10, 2009

/s/ Dominick Pope

Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trump Casino Holdings, L.L.C., and Trump Casino Funding, Inc. (the Companies) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John P. Burke, the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                             
|---------------------------------------------
|/s/ John P. Burke                            
|John P. Burke                                
|Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of
|Trump Casino Holdings, L.L.C.; and           
|Trump Casino Funding, Inc.                   
|November 15, 2004