alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No: II-14-045 August 20, 2014

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416 

NRC Assigns New Resident Inspector to McGuire Nuclear Station

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Atlanta have selected Ronald Cureton Jr. as the resident 

inspector for Duke Energy’s McGuire Nuclear Station, located near Huntersville, N.C.

 

Cureton joins NRC Senior Resident Inspector John Zeiler at the 

McGuire plant, which is located about 17 miles north of Charlotte. 

Cureton joined the NRC as a reactor engineer in the NRC’s Region I 

office outside of Philadelphia in 2004 and later served as an emergency 

preparedness inspector. He has served as the resident inspector at Duke Energy’s 

Catawba Nuclear Station, located near York, S.C., since 2008. 

In 2013, he was the acting senior resident inspector at Dominion’s Surry Power Station in southeastern 

Virginia. 

 Cureton graduated from Florida A&M University in Tallahassee, Fla., with a bachelor’s degree in 

electrical engineering.

 “Ron Cureton has the dedication and background to carry out the NRC mission of protecting people and 

the environment by helping ensure the safety of the McGuire plant,” said NRC Region II Administrator Victor 

McCree.

At least two NRC resident inspectors are assigned to each operating U.S. commercial nuclear plant. 

They serve as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major work 

projects, and interacting with plant workers and the public. Resident inspectors can serve at one site for up 

to seven years.

 The McGuire resident inspectors can be reached at 704-875-1681.
### §13101. Findings and policy

#### (a) Findings

The Congress finds that:

(1) The United States of America annually produces millions of tons of pollution and spends tens of billions of dollars per year controlling this pollution.

(2) There are significant opportunities for industry to reduce or prevent pollution at the source through cost-effective changes in production, operation, and raw materials use. Such changes offer industry substantial savings in reduced raw material, pollution control, and liability costs as well as help protect the environment and reduce risks to worker health and safety.

(3) The opportunities for source reduction are often not realized because existing regulations, and the industrial resources they require for compliance, focus upon treatment and disposal, rather than source reduction; existing regulations do not emphasize multi-media management of pollution; and businesses need information and technical assistance to overcome institutional barriers to the adoption of source reduction practices.

(4) Source reduction is fundamentally different and more desirable than waste management and pollution control. The Environmental Protection Agency needs to address the historical lack of attention to source reduction.

(5) As a first step in preventing pollution through source reduction, the Environmental Protection Agency must establish a source reduction program which collects and disseminates information, provides financial assistance to States, and implements the other activities provided for in this chapter.

#### (b) Policy

The Congress hereby declares it to be the national policy of the United States that pollution should be prevented or reduced at the source whenever feasible; pollution that cannot be prevented should be recycled in an environmentally safe manner, whenever feasible; pollution that cannot be prevented or recycled should be treated in an environmentally safe manner whenever feasible; and disposal or other release into the environment should be employed only as a last resort and should be conducted in an environmentally safe manner.

(Pub. L. 101–508, title VI, §6602, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–321.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a)(5), was in the original "this subtitle", meaning subtitle F (§§6501, 6601–6610) of title VI, Pub. L. 101–508, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of subtitle F to the Code, see Short Title note below and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 101–508, title VI, §6601, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–321, provided that: "This subtitle [subtitle F (§§6501, 6601–6610) of title VI of Pub. L. 101–508, enacting this chapter and section 4370c of this title] may be cited as the 'Pollution Prevention Act of 1990'."
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
MediciNova, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Shintaro Asako, as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



Date: August 11, 2008By:

/s/    SHINTARO
ASAKOShintaro Asako Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and such certification is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
o Futaba Tx turned on

o 6s battery connected to SkyJib

o Cycle landing gear channel on Futaba

o Attach legs to landing gear

o Unplug 6s from SkyJib

o Turn off Futaba

o Open and secure booms on SkyJib

o Calibrate GPS

o Place SkyJib in an area for GPS calibration

o Turn on Futaba

o Connect two 6s batteries to SkyJib

o Toggle mode switch between GPS and Atti to enter Calibration

o Do the dance

o Unplug 6s batteries

o Turn off Futaba

o Attach 4s battery to Z15 frame

o Connect Z15 GCU to A2

o Mount Z15 to SkyJib

o Connect 3 lobe antenna to video Tx

o Connect power to video Tx

o Set-up Video Base Station

o Extend tripod

o Mount monitor

o Attach 5 lobe antenna to Rx

o Attach Rx to monitor

o Attach 3s battery to monitor

o Connect cables

o Power up

o Connect video out of Z15 to video Tx on Skyjib

o Install SD in BMPCC

o Install battery in BMPCC

o Mount BMPCC to Z15

o Remove lens cap

o Tune preliminary settings in BMPCC

o Turn on Futaba

o Turn on Spektrum

o Power A2

o Power Z15

o Attach LiPo checker to A2 battery

o FLY

o PRESS RECORD!!
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 27 ,

2021

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 21

- 00094

- CV

MARIA CHRISTINA CHIROLLA DONNELLY , Appellant
V. JOHN P. DONNELLY, ERIC DONNELLY, & MARK DONNELLY , Appellee s
On Appeal f

rom Probate Court No

. 2 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 477195

- 401

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. Appellant filed a response , and appellee filed a rep ly.

This attempte d app ea l is from a n order granting a motion for summary judgment signed January 29, 2021

. Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Lehmann v. Har

- Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001).2

When orders do not dispose of all pending partie s and c laims, the or ders remain interlocutory and unappealable until final judgment is signed unless a statutory exception applies. Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson , 53 S.W.3d 352, 352 (Tex. 2001); Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps , 842 S.W.2 d 266, 272 (Tex

. 1992) (orig

. proceeding). The order is not a final order for the purposes of an interlocutory appeal under the Estates Co de

. Tex. Est

. Code Ann. § 32.001 (c) ; see Crowson v. Wakeham , 897 S.W.2d 779, 783 (Tex. 1995) ( inter pretating f

o rmer Probate Code

sect io n 5(f), since r epe aled ) ; T he trial court ’ s order in this case is in terlocutory and not subject to immediate appeal because it does not dispose of all parties or issues in a particular phase of the proceedings below. See Asafi v. Rauscher , No. 14

- 09

- 00800

- C V, 2009 WL 4346067, at *2 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] Dec. 3, 2009, pet. denied) (me m. op .) ; see also De Ayala v. Mackie, 193 S.W.3d 575, 578 (Tex. 2006) ( T he order must dispose of all issues in the “phase of the proceeding” for which it was brought t o be considered final ). Accordingly, we are without jurisdiction over the appeal . We g rant

a ppellees ’ motion and dismiss the appeal f o r want of jurisdiction

.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of J ustices Wise, Jewel l , and Spain.
§ 970.400 General. ( a ) Certification is an intermediate step between receipt of an application for issuance or transfer of a license and its actual issuance or transfer. It is a determination which focuses on the eligibility of the applicant.
( b ) Before the Administrator may certify an application for issuance or transfer of a license, he must determine that issuance of the license would not violate any of the restrictions in § 970.103(b). He also must make written determinations with respect to the requirements set forth in §§ 970.401 through 970.406. This will be done after consultation with other departments and agencies pursuant to § 970.211.
( c ) To the maximum extent possible, the Administrator will endeavor to complete certification of an application within 100 days after submission of an application which is in full compliance with subpart B of this part. If final certification or denial of certification has not occurred within 100 days after such submission of the application, the Administrator will inform the applicant in writing of the pending unresolved issues, the agency's efforts to resolve them, and an estimate of the time required to do so.
----

**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF**

**CHIEF      EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| (1) | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended                March                31, 2006 as filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange                Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of                Section                13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|
| (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                May 15, 2006      |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                   |   |
|                                   |   |
| /s/                Chang H. Ahn        |   |
| Chang                H. Ahn            |
| Chief                Executive Officer |

----
#### § 260.2 Interpretation and substantiation of environmental marketing claims.

Section 5 of the FTC Act prohibits deceptive acts and practices in or affecting commerce. A representation, omission, or practice is deceptive if it is likely to mislead consumers acting reasonably under the circumstances and is material to consumers' decisions. *See* FTC Policy Statement on Deception, 103 FTC 174 (1983). To determine if an advertisement is deceptive, marketers must identify all express and implied claims that the advertisement reasonably conveys. Marketers must ensure that all reasonable interpretations of their claims are truthful, not misleading, and supported by a reasonable basis before they make the claims. *See* FTC Policy Statement Regarding Advertising Substantiation, 104 FTC 839 (1984). In the context of environmental marketing claims, a reasonable basis often requires competent and reliable scientific evidence. Such evidence consists of tests, analyses, research, or studies that have been conducted and evaluated in an objective manner by qualified persons and are generally accepted in the profession to yield accurate and reliable results. Such evidence should be sufficient in quality and quantity based on standards generally accepted in the relevant scientific fields, when considered in light of the entire body of relevant and reliable scientific evidence, to substantiate that each of the marketing claims is true.
### Part A—Science Education Enhancement

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–69, title V, §5003(d)(1), Aug. 9, 2007, 121 Stat. 602, added heading.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MARLON GRANT

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 3473

[ January 25, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Michael Lynch , Judge;

L.T. Case No. 05

- 013624 CF10A

.

Marlon Grant, Pahokee, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER

, C.J., W ARNER and L EVINE

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the annual report of BidGive International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), James P. Walker, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ James P. Walker, Jr.James P. Walker, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 30, 2006
§ 1500.81 Exemptions for food, drugs, cosmetics, and fuels. ( a ) *Food, drugs, and cosmetics.* Substances subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act are exempted by section 2(f)(2) of the act; but where a food, drug, or cosmetic offers a substantial risk of injury or illness from any handling or use that is customary or usual it may be regarded as misbranded under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act because its label fails to reveal material facts with respect to consequences that may result from use of the article (21 U.S.C. 321(n)) when its label fails to bear information to alert the householder to this hazard.
( b ) *Fuels.* A substance intended to be used as a fuel is exempt from the requirements of the act when in containers that are intended to be or are installed as part of the heating, cooling, or refrigeration system of a house. A portable container used for delivery or temporary or additional storage, and containing a substance that is a hazardous substance as defined in section 2(f) of the act, is not exempt from the labeling prescribed in section 2(p) of the act, even though it contains a fuel to be used in the heating, cooking, or refrigeration system of a house.
#### § 3.55 Reconsideration.

Within fourteen (14) days after completion of service of a Commission decision, any party may file with the Commission a petition for reconsideration of such decision, setting forth the relief desired and the grounds in support thereof. Any petition filed under this subsection must be confined to new questions raised by the decision or final order and upon which the petitioner had no opportunity to argue before the Commission. Any party desiring to oppose such a petition shall file an answer thereto within ten (10) days after service upon him of the petition. The filing of a petition for reconsideration shall not operate to stay the effective date of the decision or order or to toll the running of any statutory time period affecting such decision or order unless specifically so ordered by the Commission.

[32 FR 8449, June 13, 1967, as amended at 61 FR 50650, Sept. 26, 1996]
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Spectrum Sciences & Software Holdings
Corp.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 4.
    
    The issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the issuer and have:
 (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(c)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the issuers internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the issuers fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuers internal control over financial
reporting.
 5.
    
    The issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the
audit committee of issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the issuers internal control over financial reporting.
 
  37
#### In the Matter of Louis Silverstein et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of L. Silverstein & Sons, Appellants, against General Display Case Co., Inc., Defendant, and Emil Koudelka, Inc., Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Cohn, J. P., Callahan, Breitel, Botein and Rabin, JJ.
**Exhibit      32.1**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of and for the period(s) covered in the                Report. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                  | By:    | /s/                Claire C. Skinner                             |
|---------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                  |   | Claire                C. Skinner                                 |
|                                  |   | Chairman                of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
| Date:                November 2, 2005 |   |                                                             |

**Exhibit      32.2**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of and for the period(s) covered in the                Report. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                  | By:    | /s/                Joseph P. Tomczak                                |
|---------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                  |   | Joseph                P. Tomczak                                    |
|                                  |   | Executive                Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| Date:                November 2, 2005 |   |                                                                |