alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No: IV-15-013 June 1, 2015

CONTACT: Victor Dricks (817) 200-1128

 Lara Uselding (817) 200-1519

NRC to Discuss Performance Assessment For Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold public meetings in San Luis Obispo, Calif., 

on June 24 to discuss the agency’s performance assessment for the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant. 

Diablo Canyon, located near San Luis Obispo, is operated by Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

An open house will be held from 2:00 to 5:00 p.m. followed by a meeting between NRC staff 

and PG&E officials from 6:00 to 9:00 p.m. at the Embassy Suites, 333 Madonna Road, San Luis 

Obispo. At the evening meeting, in addition to the performance assessment, the NRC staff will be 

available to answer questions from the public on Diablo Canyon-related topics. While the plant 

performed safely in 2014, it will receive an additional inspection beyond the extensive baseline 

inspections due to an emergency preparedness finding.

“In addition to discussing our annual assessment of plant performance with PG&E, the open 

house and extensive question and answer period following the meeting will provide local officials and 

the public ample opportunity to engage the NRC on our regulatory oversight activities at Diablo 

Canyon,” said Region IV Administrator Marc Dapas.

The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess nuclear 

plant performance. The colors start with green and then increase to white, yellow, or red, commensurate 

with the safety significance of the issues involved. Performance indicators are statistical measurements 

of plant and equipment performance. The NRC’s action matrix reflects overall plant performance and 

agency response. There are five columns in the matrix with Column 1 requiring a baseline level of 

inspections. 

Diablo Canyon is in Column 2 because of an emergency preparedness- related white finding 

and will receive a follow-up inspection in addition to the baseline inspections. Inspections are 

performed by two NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant and inspection specialists from the 

Region IV office in Arlington, Texas. 

A letter sent from the NRC Region IV office to plant officials addresses the performance of the 

plant during 2014. It is available on the NRC website.
Attachment 2 

Table 2. Final Regulations and Order Directed to Nuclear Power Plants for Which a 

Backfit Analysis Was Prepared 

 

RIN or Order 

# Docket ID Title FRN Date FR Citation 

3150-AI10 NRC-2008-

0122 

Final Rule - Enhancements to Emergency 

Preparedness Regulations 

11/23/2011 

76 FR 72560

3150-AJ07 NRC-2011-

0268 

Direct Final Rule - Facility Security Clearance and 

Safeguarding of National Security Information and 

Restricted Data 

8/7/2013 

78 FR 48037

EA-13-109 NRC-2013-

0128 

Order Modifying Licenses With Regard to Reliable 

Hardened Containment Vents Capable of 

Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions (a 

backfit analysis was not prepared to support the 

requirement for hardened vents to prevent or limit 

core damage, because the Commission 

reaffirmed its earlier determination (Order EA-12-

050) that such capability is needed for adequate 

protection. However, a backfit analysis to support 

the requirement for hardened vents capable of 

remaining functional during severe accidents was 

prepared. 

6/14/2013 

78 FR 35990
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §
1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the Form 10-Q) of
Surrey Bancorp (the Company), we, Edward C. Ashby, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Mark H.Towe, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:

(a) the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.



|    |  |                          |  |  |  |                        
|--- |  | ------------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Edward C. Ashby, III |  |  |  | Date: November 14, 2007
|    |  | Edward C. Ashby, III.    |  |  |  |                        
|    |  | President and            |  |  |  |                        
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer  |  |  |  |                        
|    |  |                          | 
|By: |  | /s/ Mark H. Towe         |  |  |  | Date: November 14, 2007
|    |  | Mark H. Towe             |  |  |  |                        
|    |  | Sr. Vice-President and   |  |  |  |                        
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer  |  |  |  |
Dismissed and Opinion Filed March 22, 2023 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-21-01036-CV

IN RE ESTATE OF MILA D NASRALLAH, DECEASED

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. PR-21-00240-3

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Pedersen, III, Garcia, and Breedlove Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III Before the Court is appellants’ motion fo r voluntary dismissal of the appeal.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1). We grant the mo tion and dismiss the appeal. See id.

211036F.P05 /Bill Pedersen, III / BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

IN RE: ESTATE OF MILAD NASRALLAH, DECEASED, Antoinette Nasrallah, Soraya Nasrallah, Christin e Nasrallah, and Steven Nasrallah, Appellants

No. 05-21-01036-CV V.

Craig C. Gant, Temporary Administrator of the Estate of Milad Nasrallah, Appellee On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 3, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. PR-21-00240- 3. Opinion delivered by Justice Pedersen, III. Justices Garcia and Breedlove participating.

In accordance with this Court’s op inion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.
It is ORDERED that appellee Craig C. Gant, Temporary Administrator of the Estate of Milad Nasrallah, re cover his costs of this appeal from appellants Antoinette Nasrallah, Soraya Nasra llah, Christine Nasrallah, and Steven Nasrallah.

Judgment entered this 22nd day of March, 2023.
§ 1605.9 Written interrogatories. ( a ) The Commission may order any person, sole proprietorship, partnership, or corporation being investigated to answer written interrogatories. Such interrogatories shall be answered by the individual or by any agent or officer of the sole proprietorship, partnership, or corporation who shall furnish information on behalf of the sole proprietorship, partnership, or corporation. The information provided shall be that which is known or reasonably available to the person or organization involved and shall be submitted after reasonable inquiry to obtain the information requested.
( b ) Each interrogatory shall be answered separately and fully in writing, under oath, unless it is objected to, in which event the reason for the objection shall be stated in lieu of an answer. The answers shall be signed by the individual or the officer or agent making them. The person, sole proprietorship, parnership, or corporation upon whom the interrogatories have been served shall furnish the Commission a copy of the answers and objections, if any, within 30 days after service of the interrogatories or within such shorter time as the commission may designate. Interrogatories submitted hereunder are continuing in character so as to require the person, sole proprietorship, partnership, or corporation answering to file supplementary answers upon obtaining further or different information.
### Part B—Neighborhood Development Programs
Filed by Automated Filing Services Inc. (604) 609-0244 - Park Place Energy Corp. - Exhibit 10.17






PARK PLACE ENERGY INC. 

April 30, 2007 

Great Northern Oilsands Inc. 
Suite #600, 595 Hornby St.

Vancouver, BC Canada 
V6C 1A4 

Attention:      David Lane 

Re:      Eight Mile North Field
(“Eight Mile”) 

This letter will serve to confirm our agreement as follows:


1.                        
Park Place Energy Inc. (“Park Place”) shall pay the sum of $110,000 to Terra
Energy Inc. (“Terra”) on behalf of Great Northern Oilsands Inc. (“Great
Northern”), said monies representing an outstanding amount owing by Great
Northern to Terra on account of its participation in Eight Mile. 

2.                        
As evidence of Great Northern’s obligations to Park Place on account of the
payment referred to in point (1) above Great Northern shall issue to Park Place
a promissory note in the form attached hereto evidencing its indebtedness to
Park Place in the principal amount of $110,000 (the “Debt”) with such Debt
bearing interest at 8% per annum, payable on demand. 

3.                        
In consideration of Park Place making the payment on behalf of Great Northern
provided for in point (1) above, Great Northern hereby agrees to convey to Park
Place three quarters of its 20% interest in the Eight Mile (15% interest) with
respect to any wells drilled thereon from the date hereof and in this regard
Great Northern shall execute such documents and do such further acts and things
as shall be necessary to give effect to this conveyance. 

Accepting the above accurately details your understanding of
our agreement in this regard please execute this letter where indicated and
return same at your earliest convenience. 

Yours Truly, 

PARK PLACE ENERGY INC. 

Per:      /s/ David
Stadnyk 
           
David Stadnyk, President 


Acknowledged and agreed to this 30th day of April
2007. 


GREAT NORTHERN OILSANDS INC. 


Per:      /s/ David
Lane 
           
David Lane, President
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, John J. Sherman, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A of Inergy Holdings, L.P. (the “registrant”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: May 19, 2006
§ 1502.35 Interlocutory appeal from ruling of presiding officer. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section and in §§ 1502.13(b), 1502.16(e), 1502.31(f), and 1502.37(d) authorizing interlocutory appeals, rulings of the presiding officer may not be appealed to the Commission before the Commission's consideration of the entire record of the hearing.
( b ) A ruling of the presiding officer is subject to interlocutory appeal to the Commission if the presiding officer certifies on the record or in writing that immediate review is necessary to prevent exceptional delay, expense, or prejudice to any participant or substantial harm to the public interest.
( c ) When an interlocutory appeal is made to the Commission, a participant may file a brief with the Commission only if such is specifically authorized by the presiding officer or the Commission, and, if such authorization is granted, within the period the Commission directs. If a participant is authorized to file a brief, any other participant may file a brief in opposition, within the period the Commission directs. If no briefs are authorized, the appeal will be presented as an oral argument to the Commission. The oral argument will be transcribed. If briefs are authorized, oral argument will be heard only at the discretion of the Commission.
### §10309. New spending authority; amounts provided in advance

Any new spending authority described in subsection (c)(2)(A) or (B) of section 651 1 of title 2 which is provided under this chapter shall be effective for any fiscal year only to such extent or in such amounts as are provided in advance in appropriations Acts.

(Pub. L. 98–242, title I, §111, Mar. 22, 1984, 98 Stat. 101.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 651 of title 2, referred to in text, was amended by Pub. L. 105–33, title X, §10116(a)(3), (5), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 691, by striking out subsec. (c) and redesignating former subsec. (d) as (c).

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 98–242, Mar. 22, 1984, 98 Stat. 97, known as the Water Resources Research Act of 1984, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 10301 of this title and Tables.

1 See References in Text note below.
### §12207. Federal wilderness areas

#### (a) Study

The National Council on Disability shall conduct a study and report on the effect that wilderness designations and wilderness land management practices have on the ability of individuals with disabilities to use and enjoy the National Wilderness Preservation System as established under the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.).

#### (b) Submission of report

Not later than 1 year after July 26, 1990, the National Council on Disability shall submit the report required under subsection (a) to Congress.

#### (c) Specific wilderness access

#### (1) In general

Congress reaffirms that nothing in the Wilderness Act [16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.] is to be construed as prohibiting the use of a wheelchair in a wilderness area by an individual whose disability requires use of a wheelchair, and consistent with the Wilderness Act no agency is required to provide any form of special treatment or accommodation, or to construct any facilities or modify any conditions of lands within a wilderness area in order to facilitate such use.

#### (2) "Wheelchair" defined

For purposes of paragraph (1), the term "wheelchair" means a device designed solely for use by a mobility-impaired person for locomotion, that is suitable for use in an indoor pedestrian area.

(Pub. L. 101–336, title V, §508, formerly §507, July 26, 1990, 104 Stat. 372; renumbered §508, Pub. L. 110–325, §6(a)(2), Sept. 25, 2008, 122 Stat. 3558.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Wilderness Act, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (c)(1), is Pub. L. 88–577, Sept. 3, 1964, 78 Stat. 890, which is classified generally to chapter 23 (§1131 et seq.) of Title 16, Conservation. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1131 of Title 16 and Tables.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 508 of Pub. L. 101–336 was renumbered section 509 and is classified to section 12208 of this title.
§ 1502.27 Participation of nonparties. ( a ) A nonparty participant may— ( 1 ) Attend all conferences (including the prehearing conference), oral proceedings, and arguments;
( 2 ) Submit written testimony and documentary evidence for inclusion in the record;
( 3 ) File written objections, briefs, and other pleadings; and
( 4 ) Present oral argument.
( b ) A nonparty participant may not— ( 1 ) Submit written interrogatories; or
( 2 ) Conduct cross-examination.
( c ) A person whose petition is the subject of the hearing has the same right as a party.
( d ) A nonparty participant will be permitted additional rights if the presiding officer concludes that the participant's interests would not be adequately protected otherwise or that broader participation is required for a full and true disclosure of the facts, but the rights of a nonparty participant may not exceed the rights of a party.
exv4w5



 





Exhibit 4.5




APPENDIX A




FORM OF NOTICE OF ELECTION




[One Earth LLC Letterhead]




RESCISSION
OFFER ELECTION FORM _________ , 2007




     ___
I accept this rescission offer. Please refund the initial payment I made for
subscription of the membership units, plus interest at the statutory rate.



     ___
I decline this rescission offer and will continue my investment. I understand that my
right to sue under the securities laws of ___, with respect to the material changes
to One Earth Energy’s initial public offering extinguished with this offer of rescission.




     Note
for Indiana investors: According to Indiana State law, if you do
not return your election form, you will be deemed to have accepted
the rescission offer and your subscription will be cancelled.





	 	 	 
	                                                            

	 	                                        
	(Subscriber’s name and signature)

	 	(Date)





In order to register your election, you must return this completed Rescission Offer Election Form
to us at the following address:




One Earth Energy, LLC

1306 West 8th Street

Gibson City, Illinois 60936



IF YOU WISH TO CONFIRM YOUR SUBSCRIPTION, YOU MUST CHECK THE BOX AS INDICATED ABOVE AND RETURN THIS
FORM TO US. YOU MAY CHANGE YOUR ELECTION AT ANYTIME PRIOR TO EXPIRATION OF THE RESCISSION OFFER.
THE RESCISSION OFFER EXPIRES ON ___, 2007. ONCE YOU RETURN THE COMPLETED FORM AND THE
RESCISSION OFFER EXPIRES, YOUR ELECTION TO CONFIRM IS IRREVOCABLE, AND YOUR INVESTMENT WILL NOT BE
RETURNED, UNLESS WE REJECT YOUR SUBSCRIPTION. IF THIS FORM IS NOT COMPLETED AND RECEIVED BY US
BEFORE 5:00 P.M. CST ON ___, 2007, YOUR RESCISSION RIGHTS ARE WAIVED, AND YOU WILL NOT BE
ABLE TO WITHDRAW YOUR INVESTMENT.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of
MediciNova, Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the Report), I, Shintaro Asako, Vice President, Accounting and Administration of MediciNova, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MediciNova, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



Date: August 11, 2006By:

/S/    SHINTARO ASAKOShintaro Asako Vice President, Accounting and Administration (Principal Accounting
Officer)
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-14-0082 - Jurisdiction for Military Radium and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Oversight of U.S. Department of Defense Remediation of Radioactive Material

Accession Number: ML14097A005

Date Released: Monday, August 18, 2014

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML14097A040 - SECY-14-0082: Jurisdiction for Military Radium and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Oversight of U.S. Department of Defense Remediation of Radioactive Material (7 page(s), 8/1/2014)
    - ML13277A566 - SECY-14-0082:  Enclosure 1 - DoD Memorandum of Understanding Support Letter. (2 page(s), 8/1/2013)
    - ML14098A353 - SECY-14-0082:  Enclosure 2 - Summary of Public Comments on the Draft Regulatory Issue Summary for Military Radium (3 page(s), 8/1/2014)
    - ML14098A356 - SECY-14-0082:  Enclosure 3 - U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Staff Views on Resolution of Major U.S. Department of Defense Comment Areas and New Concerns Raised in Discussions with U.S. Department of Defense (2 page(s), 8/1/2014)
    - ML14098A409 - SECY-14-0082:  Enclosure 4 - Key Provisions of a Memorandum of Understanding (3 page(s), 8/1/2014)
    - ML14098A415 - SECY-14-0082:  Enclosure 5 - Options for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Involvement with U.S. Department of Defense's Remediation (5 page(s), 8/1/2014)
    - ML14098A418 - SECY-14-0082:  Enclosure 6 - Description of The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Involvement under a Potential Memorandum of Understanding with the U.S. Department of Defense (2 page(s), 8/1/2014)
    - ML14098A424 - SECY-14-0082:  Enclosure 7 - Resolution of Issues Regarding the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Involvement with the U.S. Department of Defense Remediation of Radium and other Atomic Energy Act Radioactive Material (2 page(s), 8/1/2014)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer