alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to Content

        -   Log in            -  Log inEmailPassword Show Password	            Remember meAlready have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 
        -            -  Forgot your password?Email Already have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 
        -            -  Resend confirmation instructionsEmail Already have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 
        -   Sign Up            -  Sign upEmail Password Passwords must be at least 6 characters and contain at least one lower-case letter, one upper-case letter, one number, and one punctuation mark or symbolPassword confirmation  Show Password            Already have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 

# Search Publications

- Home

#           Agricultural Chemical Usage - Fruits            NASSLog in or Sign Up to subscribe        

----

Frequency of Release:Not Specified

----

Category:Agriculture Economics and Management:Production Practices

Keywords:agrochemicalsberriesfruitspest managementpesticides

----

## Releases

            -  « Previous 
            -  Next » 
            -  1 
            -  2 

| Jul 25, 2012 | TXT | Jul 25, 2012: Agricultural Chemical Usage - Fruits detailsx                Jul 25, 2012: Agricultural Chemical Usage - FruitsRelease datetime:Jul 25, 2012Close |
|--------------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Contact office name:National Agricultural Statistics Service

Contact email:nass@nass.usda.gov

##         Agency Announcements        
Do you also want to subscribe to all agency announcements from ?
NoYesFooter content with page navigation, site information, and copyright.-  Home 
-  Release Calendar 
×Release CalendarClose
-  About
-  Help 
-  Contact 
-  API 

The USDA Economics, Statistics and Market Information System (ESMIS) contains over 2,100 publications from five agencies of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). These materials cover U.S. and international agriculture and related      topics. Mann Library at Cornell University developed and maintains this site.

© 2024 USDA Economics, Statistics and Market Information System
USDA ESMIS partners list with links to their websites.Partners:- Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
- Economic Research Service (ERS)
- Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS)
- National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS)
- World Agricultural Outlook Board (WAOB)
- 
- Albert R. Mann Library, Cornell University
- United States Department of Agriculture
Cornell development contact information.Developed & supported by:
**Albert R. Mann Library**Cornell UniversityIthaca, NY 14853-4301 Phone: (607) 255-3296 Email: usda-help@cornell.edu
### §§11241, 11242. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 11241, Pub. L. 99–660, title IX, §941, Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3808, which provided for Director of National Institute on Aging to conduct, or make grants for conduct of, research on services for individuals with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias and their families, was redesignated section 445C of the Public Health Service Act by Pub. L. 100–607, title I, §142(a), Nov. 4, 1988, 102 Stat. 3057, and is classified to section 285e–5 of this title.

Section 11242, Pub. L. 99–660, title IX, §942, Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3809, which provided for Director to disseminate results of such research to professional entities and the public, was redesignated section 445D of the Public Health Service Act by Pub. L. 100–607, title I, §142(a), Nov. 4, 1988, 102 Stat. 3057, and is classified to section 285e–6 of this title.
### §§131 to 135. Repealed. July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XIII, §1313, 58 Stat. 714

Section 131, act Feb. 3, 1917, ch. 26, §1, 39 Stat. 872, provided for establishment of a leprosy home in the United States.

Section 132, act Feb. 3, 1917, ch. 26, §4, 39 Stat. 873, provided for erection of buildings for the home.

Section 133, act Feb. 3, 1917, ch. 26, §2, 39 Stat. 873, provided for receipt of lepers into the home. See section 255 of this title.

Section 134, act Feb. 3, 1917, ch. 26, §3, 39 Stat. 873, provided for regulations governing the home. See section 255 of this title.

Section 135, act Feb. 3, 1917, ch. 26, §5, 39 Stat. 873, provided for additional pay of officers detailed to duty at said home. See section 210 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Renumbering and Repeal of Repealing Act

Title XIII, §1313, formerly title VI, §611, of act July 1, 1944, which repealed these sections, was renumbered title VII, §711, by act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 958, §5, 60 Stat. 1049; §713, by act Feb. 28, 1948, ch. 83, §9(b), 62 Stat. 47; title VIII, §813, by act July 30, 1956, ch. 779, §3(b), 70 Stat. 721; title IX, §913, by Pub. L. 88–581, §4(b), Sept. 4, 1964, 78 Stat. 919; title X, §1013, by Pub. L. 89–239, §3(b), Oct. 6, 1965, 79 Stat. 931; title XI, §1113, by Pub. L. 91–572, §6(b), Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1506; title XII, §1213, by Pub. L. 92–294, §3(b), May 16, 1972, 86 Stat. 137; title XIII, §1313, by Pub. L. 93–154, §2(b)(2), Nov. 16, 1973, 87 Stat. 604, and was repealed by Pub. L. 93–222, §7(b), Dec. 29, 1973, 87 Stat. 936.
#### Rose Shepard, Respondent, v. Louis Buchsbaum, Appellant.

Memorandum: The order for an examination before trial should be modified by striking out item No. 7. That part of the order providing for a discovery and inspection should be stricken out and a limited inspection, pursuant to section,296 of the Civil Practice Act, of the books and records or portions of the same relevant to the issues upon which the examination is to be had, covering the period from August 1, 1947, to July 31, 1948, should be permitted, under the supervision of an official referee. (See *Haffenberg*v. Wendling, 271 App. Div. 1057.) All concur. (The portion of the order appealed from grants a motion for an examination before trial.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-15-0058: FY 2014 Materials Licensee Performance Annual Report

Accession Number: ML15049A311

Date Released: Monday, April 27, 2015

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML15049A358 - SECY-15-0058:  Annual Report to the Commission on Licensee Performance in the Materials and Waste Programs Fiscal Year 2014 (8 page(s), 4/8/2015)
    - ML15049A468 - SECY-15-0058:  Enclosue 1 - FY 2014 Materials Licensee Performance Annual Report (92 page(s), 4/8/2015)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### § 1616.64 Policy regarding recordkeeping requirements.

No provision of the Standard for the Flammability of Children's Sleepwear: Sizes 7 through 14 (FF 5-74) (subpart A of this part) or of the enforcement regulations at § 1616.31 prohibits the utilization of fabric which was manufactured before May 1, 1975, and which was not manufactured in production units, in the manufacture of children's sleepwear garments which are subject to the Standard. When such fabric is utilized in the manufacture of such garments, the inability of the garment manufacturer to record the fabric production unit identification of such fabric does not constitute a violation of § 1616.31(d)(4)(i).
October 9, 2015 

MEMORANDUM TO: Victor M. McCree 

 Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS – SECY-14-0148 – IMPLEMENTATION 

PLAN FOR “PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT COORDINATOR” 

POSITION IN RESPONSE TO STAFF REQUIREMENTS 

MEMORANDUM – SECY-14-0078 

The staff’s proposed implementation plan for a public engagement coordinator position is not 

approved at this time. 

The staff should assess whether a dedicated staff position to direct or navigate external 

stakeholders to other NRC organizations for information will materially strengthen public 

interface as part of the Project AIM re-baselining effort and make a recommendation in its 

report. 

The staff should continue with the process enhancements contained in SECY-14-0078, Option 

1, sub-elements a (enhancing of the “Contact Us” Web page), b (providing additional tools and 

resources to the NRC operator), and c (creating opportunities for information sharing). 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA 

 OPA 

 Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-41326 Summary Calendar

DONALD SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant

v. COLLIN COUNTY JAIL; TERRY BOX, Sheriff; NFN FRIZE L L , Lieutenant; COLLIN COUNTY TEXAS, Defendants-Appellees

A ppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:11-CV-801

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Donald Smith, Texas prisoner # 6 69727, appeals the summary judgment dismissal of a c ivil rights action p u r s u a n t t o 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Collin C o unty Texas, S h eriff Box, and Lt. Frizell. 1 Smith alleges t hat, while he w a s confined at C ollin Co u n t y Jail on a bench warrant from October 4, 2011, to J a n u ary 12, 2 012, his c onstitutional right of access to the c o urts was violat e d U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Decem ber 2, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not preced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum stances s et f orth in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47. 5. 4.

1 Collin County Jail w as previous ly d is m is s ed f rom this action. Case: 12-41326 Document: 00512457310 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/02/2013No. 12-41326

because he was denied use of the jail’s law library. According to Sm i t h , this denial of access prevented h im from researching and preparing a state habeas application regarding his Dallas County conviction. A district court’s grant of summary j udgment is rev i e w e d d e novo. Berquist v. Washington M ut. Bank , 500 F.3d 344, 3 48 (5th Cir. 2007). Pretrial detainees have a right of access to the courts. See Walker v . Navarro C nty. Jail , 4 F.3d 410, 413 (5th Cir. 1993). Lack of access t o legal materials may constitute

an unconstitutional infringement on a prisoner’s right of access to t h e c o u r t s . See B ounds v. Smith , 430 U.S. 817, 828 (1977). To p revail on an access-to-the-courts claim, a prisoner must s how an a ctual injury. Lewis v. Casey , 518 U.S. 343, 349-51 (1996). Such an i njury is s hown when the prisoner demonstrates that the policies or actions o f p r ison offici a l s have h indered his ability to file a nonfrivolous legal claim. See Christopher v. Harbury , 536 U.S. 403, 414-22 (2002); L ewis , 518 U.S. at 351, 356. Smith’s allegations do not set forth an actual i n jury for purposes of a denial-of-access-to-cour t s claim. Smith d i d not show that his state habeas application would c ontain a nonfrivolous, a rguable l egal claim. S ee C hristopher , 536 U.S. at 415-16. Smith has not d e monstrated an actual injury sufficient to establish a constitutional violation o f his right o f access t o the courts. Lewis , 518 U.S. at 351, 356. Accordingly, the district court judgment is AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 12-41326 Document: 00512457310 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/02/2013
#### § 930.116 Judicial review.

The availability of the mediation services provided in this subpart is not intended expressly or implicitly to limit the parties' use of alternate forums to resolve disputes. Specifically, judicial review where otherwise available by law may be sought by any party to a serious disagreement without first having exhausted the mediation process provided for in this subpart.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-53,794] 

Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on December 12, 2003 in response to a worker petition which was filed by a State agency representative on behalf of workers at Weyerhaeuser, Bay City Sorting Yard, Cosmopolis, Washington (TA-W-53,794). 

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed in Washington, DC this 9th day of January 2004. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 04-2600 Filed 2-5-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-4760

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MELVIN EUGENE GIBBS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. David A. Faber, Chief District Judge. (CR-03-400-PJM) Submitted: May 31, 2006 Decided: June 14, 2006 Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Melvin Eugene Gibbs, Appellant Pro Se. James M. Trusty, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Melvin Eugene Gibbs pled guilty to one count of mailing threatening communications, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 876 (West Supp. 2005). Gibbs is an attorney and is proceeding pro se on appeal. On appeal, Gibbs raises claims of whether it was proper for the district court to recuse all District of Maryland judges and appoint a Southern District of West Virginia judge; whether the district court erred in ordering a competency hearing to determine if Gibbs was competent to stand trial and serve as his own counsel; whether the delay caused by the competency examination and hearing resulted in a violation of the Speedy Trial Act; whether it was error for the Government to use case files relating to Gibbs’ other cases; whether Gibbs was forced to plead guilty by requiring a competency hearing, denying him medical care in detention, and due to unspecified risks to the lives of himself and his family based on Gibbs’ prosecution of a civil case; whether the indictment sufficiently charged specific intent to mail a threatening communication; whether the prosecution for mailing a threatening communication violated Gibbs’ First Amendment rights; whether the district court erred in denying Gibbs bail; and whether ineffective assistance of counsel caused Gibbs to plead guilty. We have reviewed Gibbs’ brief on appeal, the appendix submitted by Gibbs, the Government’s letter in reply to Gibbs’ brief, and the record, which included transcripts of the relevant- 3 - proceedings. After a careful review of the claims asserted by Gibbs on appeal and the record before us, we affirm Gibbs’ judgment. We grant Gibbs’ motion to file a reply brief, but deny all his pending motions for expedited treatment and to stay his conviction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3499 

To require the Secretary of Agriculture to use section 32 of the Act of 

August 24, 1935, to provide compensation to certain poultry producers 

whose poultry production contracts were terminated or not renewed because of the closure of poultry processing plants and other cost cutting 

measures undertaken by a poultry processing company in bankruptcy 

protection. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2011 

Mr. PRICE of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Agriculture to use section 32 

of the Act of August 24, 1935, to provide compensation 

to certain poultry producers whose poultry production 

contracts were terminated or not renewed because of 

the closure of poultry processing plants and other cost 

cutting measures undertaken by a poultry processing 

company in bankruptcy protection. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3499 IH

1 SECTION 1. COMPENSATION FOR ECONOMIC LOSSES DUE 

2 TO LOSS OF POULTRY PRODUCTION CON3 TRACTS WITH BANKRUPT POULTRY PROC4 ESSING COMPANY. 

5 Using amounts in the fund established under section 

6 32 of the Act of August 24, 1935 (7 U.S.C. 612c), and 

7 the authority provided by paragraph (3) of the second sen8 tence of such section, the Secretary of Agriculture, acting 

9 through the Farm Service Agency, shall provide com10 pensation to poultry producers whose poultry production 

11 contracts were terminated or not renewed during the pe12 riod beginning on December 1, 2010, and ending on the 

13 date of the enactment of this Act, because of the closure 

14 of poultry processing plants and other cost cutting meas15 ures undertaken by a poultry processing company in bank16 ruptcy protection. A poultry producer seeking compensa17 tion under this section shall be required to document to 

18 the satisfaction of the Secretary the termination or non19 renewal of a production contract and the subsequent eco20 nomic losses incurred by the producer as a result of the 

21 termination or non-renewal of the contract by the poultry 

22 processing company. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
§ 1031.3 Consumer Product Safety Act amendments. The Consumer Product Safety Act, as amended, contains several sections pertaining to the Commission's participation in the development and use of voluntary standards. ( a ) Section 7(b) provides that the Commission shall rely on voluntary consumer product safety standards prescribing requirements described in subsection (a) whenever compliance with such voluntary standards would eliminate or adequately reduce the risk of injury addressed and it is likely that there will be substantial compliance with such voluntary standards. (15 U.S.C. 2056(b)).
( b ) Section 5(a)(3) provides that the Commission shall, following publication of an advance notice of proposed rulemaking or a notice of proposed rulemaking for a product safety rule under any rulemaking authority administered by the Commission, assist public and private organizations or groups of manufacturers, administratively and technically, in the development of safety standards addressing the risk of injury identified in such notice. (15 U.S.C. 2054(a)(3)).
( c ) Section 5(a)(4) provides that the Commission shall, to the extent practicable and appropriate (taking into account the resources and priorities of the Commission), assist public and private organizations or groups of manufacturers, administratively and technically, in the development of product safety standards and test methods. (15 U.S.C. 2054(a)(4)).
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3623 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3623

To authorize and request the President to award the congressional Medal 
of Honor to Arthur Jibilian for actions behind enemy lines during World 
   War II while a member of the United States Navy and the Office of 
                          Strategic Services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 8, 2011

 Mr. Latta (for himself and Ms. Kaptur) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize and request the President to award the congressional Medal 
of Honor to Arthur Jibilian for actions behind enemy lines during World 
   War II while a member of the United States Navy and the Office of 
                          Strategic Services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION AND REQUEST FOR AWARD OF MEDAL OF HONOR TO 
              ARTHUR JIBILIAN FOR ACTS OF VALOR DURING WORLD WAR II.

    (a) Authorization.--Notwithstanding the time limitations specified 
in sections 6248 and 6250 of title 10, United States Code, or any other 
time limitation with respect to the awarding of certain medals to 
persons who served in the Armed Forces, the President is authorized and 
requested to award the Medal of Honor under section 6241 of such title 
to Arthur Jibilian for the acts of valor described in subsection (b) 
during World War II while a member of the United States Navy and the 
Office of Strategic Services.
    (b) Acts of Valor Described.--The acts of valor referred to in 
subsection (a) are the actions of Arthur Jibilian during the successful 
1944 operation by the Office of Strategic Services, code-named 
``Operation Halyard'', to protect and facilitate in the rescue of over 
500 allied airmen behind enemy lines.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 25 (Friday, February 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 5870]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2615]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-53,866]


Schott Scientific Glass; Parkersburg, WV; Notice of Termination 
of Investigation

    Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on December 23, 2003, in response to a 
petition filed by the United Steelworkers of America, local 570 on 
behalf of workers at Schott Scientific Glass, Parkersburg, West 
Virginia.
    The petitioning group of workers is covered by an active 
certification issued on February 20, 2002, and which remains in effect 
(TA-W-40,263). Consequently, further investigation in this case would 
serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 14th day of January, 2004.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-2615 Filed 2-5-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
### §13001b. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 13001b was editorially reclassified as section 20303 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.