UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549  Form 10-KSB  xANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006  oTRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from ____ to _____   MERCI, INC. (Name of small business in its charter)  Delaware0-5135652-2175891(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)(Commission File Number)(IRS Employer Identification Number)P.O. Box 110310,
Naples, Florida 34108-0106(Address of principal executive offices)Registrants telephone number, including area code: (239) 598-2300 Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: Common Stock, par value $0.001  Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. [ ] Yes [ X ] No  Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB. [  ]  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  [ X ] Yes [ ] No  State issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year:  $0.00  State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of a specified date within the past 60 days. (See definition of affiliate in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.) $0.00  State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date: As of August 1, 2008, the Company had 2,647,640 shares issued and outstanding.  Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one): Yes ____; No _X__


PART I  ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS.  General  Merci, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as we, us, our, Merci, or the Company) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on August 20, 1997.  To date, the Companys only activities have been organizational ones, directed at developing its business plan and raising its initial capital.  The Company has not commenced any commercial operations.  The Company has no full-time employees and owns no real estate.  The Company is a development stage company, whose business plan is to seek, investigate, and, if warranted, acquire one or more properties or businesses, and to pursue other related activities intended to enhance shareholder value. The acquisition of a business opportunity may be made by purchase, merger, exchange of stock, or otherwise, and may encompass assets or a business entity, such as a corporation, joint venture, or partnership. The Company has very limited capital, and it is unlikely that the Company will be able to take advantage of more than one such business opportunity. The Company intends to seek opportunities demonstrating the potential of long-term growth as opposed to short-term earnings.  At the present time, the Company has not identified any business opportunity that it plans to pursue, nor has the Company reached any agreement or understanding with any person concerning an acquisition.  It is anticipated that the Company's officers, directors, and non-management principal shareholders named herein will contact broker-dealers and other persons with whom they are acquainted who are involved in corporate finance matters to advise them of the Company's existence and to determine if any companies or businesses they represent have a general interest in considering a merger or acquisition with a development stage company. No assurance can be given that the Company will be successful in finding or acquiring a desirable business opportunity, given the limited funds that are expected to be available for acquisitions, or that any acquisition that occurs will be on terms that are favorable to the Company or its stockholders.  The Company's search will be directed toward small and medium-sized enterprises which have a desire to become public corporations and which are able to satisfy, or anticipate in the reasonably near future being able to satisfy, the minimum asset requirements in order to qualify shares for trading on NASDAQ or on an exchange such as the American Stock Exchange. (See "Investigation and Selection of Business Opportunities").  The Company anticipates that the business opportunities presented to it will (i) either be in the process of formation, or be recently organized with limited operating history, or a history of losses attributable to under-capitalization or other factors; (ii) be experiencing financial or operating difficulties; (iii) be in need of funds to develop a new product or service or to expand into a new market; (iv) be relying upon an untested product or marketing concept; or (v) have a combination of the characteristics mentioned in (i) through (iv). The Company intends to concentrate its acquisition efforts on properties or businesses that it believes to be undervalued or that it believes may realize a substantial benefit from being publicly owned. Given the above factors, investors should expect that any acquisition candidate may have little or no operating history, or a history of losses or low profitability.  The Company does not propose to restrict its search for investment opportunities to any particular geographical area or industry, and may, therefore, engage in essentially any business, to the extent of its limited resources. This includes industries such as service, finance, natural resources, manufacturing, high technology, product


2


development, medical, communications and others. The Company's discretion in the selection of business opportunities is unrestricted, subject to the availability of such opportunities, economic conditions, and other factors.  Any entity which has an interest in being acquired by, or merging into the Company, is expected to be an entity that desires to become a public company and establish a public trading market for its securities. In connection with such a merger or acquisition, it is highly likely that an amount of stock constituting control of the Company would either be issued by the Company or be purchased from the current principal shareholders of the Company by the acquiring entity or its affiliates. If stock is purchased from the current shareholders, the transaction is very likely to be a private transaction rather than a public distribution of securities. The sale of a controlling interest by certain principal shareholders of the Company could occur at a time when the other shareholders of the Company remain subject to restrictions on the transfer of their shares.  Depending upon the nature of the transaction, the current officers and directors of the Company may resign their management positions with the Company in connection with a change in control of the Company or its acquisition of a business opportunity. In the event of such a resignation, the Company's current management would not have any control over the conduct of the Company's business following the change in control or the Company's combination with a business opportunity.  It is anticipated that business opportunities will come to the Company's attention from various sources, including its officers and directors, its other stockholders, professional advisors such as attorneys and accountants, securities broker-dealers, venture capitalists, members of the financial community, and others who may present unsolicited proposals. The Company has no plans, understandings, agreements, or commitments with any individual for such person to act as a finder of opportunities for the Company.  Investigation and Selection of Business Opportunities  To a large extent, a decision to participate in a specific business opportunity may be made upon management's analysis of the quality of the other company's management and personnel, the anticipated acceptability of new products or marketing concepts, the merit of technological innovations, the perceived benefit the business opportunity will derive from becoming a publicly held entity, and numerous other factors which are difficult, if not impossible, to analyze through the application of any objective criteria. In many instances, it is anticipated that the historical operations of a specific business opportunity may not necessarily be indicative of the potential for the future, because of the possible need to shift marketing approaches substantially, expand significantly, change product emphasis, change or substantially augment management, or make other changes. The Company will be dependent upon the owners of the business opportunity to identify any such problems which may exist and to implement, or be primarily responsible for the implementation of, required changes. Because the Company may participate in a business opportunity with a newly organized firm or with a firm which is entering a new phase of growth, the Company will incur further risks, because management in many instances will not have proven its abilities or effectiveness, the eventual market for the products or services of the business opportunity will likely not be established, and the business opportunity may not be profitable when acquired.  It is anticipated that the Company will not be able to diversify, but will essentially be limited to one such venture because of the Company's limited financing. This lack of diversification will not permit the Company to offset potential losses from one business opportunity against profits from another, and should be considered an adverse factor affecting any decision to purchase the Company's securities.  It is emphasized that management of the Company may effect transactions having a potentially adverse impact upon the Company's shareholders pursuant to the authority and discretion of the Company's management to


3


complete acquisitions without submitting any proposal to the stockholders for their consideration.  Holders of the Company's securities should not anticipate that the Company necessarily will furnish such holders, prior to any merger or acquisition, with financial statements, or any other documentation, concerning a target company or its business. In some instances, however, the proposed participation in a business opportunity may be submitted to the stockholders for their consideration, either voluntarily by such directors to seek the stockholders' advice and consent or because state law so requires.  The analysis of business opportunities will be undertaken by or under the supervision of the Company's officers and directors, none of whom are professional business analysts. Although there are no current plans to do so, Company management might hire an outside consultant to assist in the investigation and selection of business opportunities, and might pay a finder's fee. Since Company management has no current plans to use any outside consultants or advisors to assist in the investigation and selection of business opportunities, no policies have been adopted regarding use of such consultants or advisors, the criteria to be used in selecting such consultants or advisors, the services to be provided, the term of service, or regarding the total amount of fees that may be paid. However, because of the limited resources of the Company, it is likely that any such fee the Company agrees to pay would be paid in stock and not in cash. Otherwise, the Company anticipates that it will consider, among other things, the following factors:  (1)      Potential for growth and profitability, indicated by new technology, anticipated market expansion, or new products;  (2) The Company's perception of how any particular business opportunity will be received by the investment community and by the Company's stockholders;  (3)      Whether, following the business combination, the financial condition of the business opportunity would be, or would have a significant prospect in the foreseeable future of becoming sufficient to enable the securities of the Company to qualify for listing on an exchange or on a national automated securities quotation system;  (4) Capital requirements and anticipated availability of required funds to be provided by the Company or from operations, through the sale of additional securities, through joint ventures or similar arrangements, or from other sources;  (5) The extent to which the business opportunity can be advanced;  (6) Competitive position as compared to other companies of similar size and experience within the industry segment as well as within the industry as a whole;  (7) Strength and diversity of existing management, or management prospects that are scheduled for recruitment;  (8) The cost of participation by the Company as compared to the perceived tangible and intangible values and potential; and   (9) The accessibility of required management expertise, personnel, raw materials, services, professional assistance, and other required items.  No one of the factors described above will be controlling in the selection of a business opportunity, and management will attempt to analyze all factors appropriate to each opportunity and make a determination based


4


upon reasonable investigative measures and available data. Potentially available business opportunities may occur in many different industries and at various stages of development, all of which will make the task of comparative investigation and analysis of such business opportunities extremely difficult and complex.  Potential investors must recognize that, because of the Company's limited capital available for investigation and management's limited experience in business analysis, the Company may not discover or adequately evaluate adverse facts about the opportunity to be acquired.  The Company is unable to predict when it may participate in a business opportunity. It expects, however, that the analysis of specific proposals and the selection of a business opportunity may take several months or more.  Prior to making a decision to participate in a business opportunity, the Company will generally request that it be provided with written materials regarding the business opportunity containing such items as a description of products, services and company history; management resumes; financial information; available projections, with related assumptions upon which they are based; an explanation of proprietary products and services; evidence of existing patents, trademarks, or services marks, or rights thereto; present and proposed forms of compensation to management; a description of transactions between such company and its affiliates during relevant periods; a description of present and required facilities; an analysis of risks and competitive conditions; a financial plan of operation and estimated capital requirements; audited financial statements, or if they are not available, unaudited financial statements, together with reasonable assurance that audited financial statements would be able to be produced within a reasonable period of time not to exceed 60 days following completion of a merger transaction; and other information deemed relevant.  As part of the Company's investigation, the Company's executive officers and directors may meet personally with management and key personnel, may visit and inspect material facilities, obtain independent analysis or verification of certain information provided, check references of management and key personnel, and take other reasonable investigative measures, to the extent of the Company's limited financial resources and management expertise.  Company management believes that various types of potential merger or acquisition candidates might find a business combination with the Company to be attractive. These include acquisition candidates desiring to create a public market for their shares in order to enhance liquidity for current shareholders, acquisition candidates which have long-term plans for raising capital through the public sale of securities and believe that the possible prior existence of a public market for their securities would be beneficial, and acquisition candidates which plan to acquire additional assets through issuance of securities rather than for cash, and believe that the possibility of development of a public market for their securities will be of assistance in that process.  Acquisition candidates which have a need for an immediate cash infusion are not likely to find a potential business combination with the Company to be an attractive alternative.  Form of Acquisition  It is impossible to predict the manner in which the Company may participate in a business opportunity. Specific business opportunities will be reviewed as well as the respective needs and desires of the Company and the promoters of the opportunity and, upon the basis of that review and the relative negotiating strength of the Company and such promoters, the legal structure or method deemed by management to be suitable will be selected. Such structure may include, but is not limited to, leases, purchase and sale agreements, licenses, joint ventures and other contractual arrangements. The Company may act directly or indirectly through an interest in a partnership, corporation or other form of organization. Implementing such structure may require the merger, consolidation or reorganization of the Company with other corporations or forms of business organization. In addition, the present management and stockholders of the Company most likely will not have control of a


5


majority of the voting shares of the Company following a merger or reorganization transaction. As part of such a transaction, the Company's existing directors may resign and new directors may be appointed without any vote by stockholders.  The Company will participate in a business opportunity only after the negotiation and execution of a written agreement. Although the terms of such agreement cannot be predicted, generally such an agreement would require specific representations and warranties by all of the parties thereto, specify certain events of default, detail the terms of closing and the conditions which must be satisfied by each of the parties thereto prior to such closing, outline the manner of bearing costs if the transaction is not closed, set forth remedies upon default, and include miscellaneous other terms.  As a general matter, the Company anticipates that it, and/or its principal shareholders will enter into a letter of intent with the management, principals or owners of a prospective business opportunity prior to signing a binding agreement. Such a letter of intent will set forth the terms of the proposed acquisition but will not bind any of the parties to consummate the transaction.  Execution of a letter of intent will by no means indicate that consummation of an acquisition is probable. Neither the Company nor any of the other parties to the letter of intent will be bound to consummate the acquisition unless and until a definitive agreement concerning the acquisition as described in the preceding paragraph is executed. Even after a definitive agreement is executed, it is possible that the acquisition would not be consummated should any party elect to exercise any right provided in the agreement to terminate it on specified grounds.  It is anticipated that the investigation of specific business opportunities and the negotiation, drafting and execution of relevant agreements, disclosure documents and other instruments will require substantial management time and attention and substantial costs for accountants, attorneys and others. If a decision is made not to participate in a specific business opportunity, the costs theretofore incurred in the related investigation would not be recoverable. Moreover, because many providers of goods and services require compensation at the time or soon after the goods and services are provided, the inability of the Company  to pay until an indeterminate future time may make it impossible to procure goods and services.  Competition  The Company expects to encounter substantial competition in its efforts to locate attractive opportunities, primarily from business development companies, venture capital partnerships and corporations, venture capital affiliates of large industrial and financial companies, small investment companies, and wealthy individuals. Many of these entities will have significantly greater experience, resources and managerial capabilities than the Company and will therefore be in a better position than the Company to obtain access to attractive business opportunities. The Company also will experience competition from other public "blind pool" companies, many of which may have more funds available than does the Company.  Administrative Offices  The Company maintains a mailing address at P.O. Box 110310, Naples, Florida 34108-0106.  Other than this mailing address, the Company does not currently maintain any other office facilities, and does not anticipate the need for maintaining office facilities at any time in the foreseeable future.  The Company pays no rent for the use of this mailing address.


6


Employees  The Company is a development stage company and currently has no employees. Management of the Company expects to use consultants, attorneys and accountants as necessary, and does not anticipate a need to engage and full-time employees so long as it is seeking and evaluating business opportunities. The need for employees and their availability will be addressed in connection with the decision whether or not to acquire or participate in specific business opportunities. No remuneration will be paid to the Company's officers except as set forth under "Executive Compensation" and under "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions."  ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.  The Company currently has no investments in real estate, real estate mortgages, or real estate securities.  The Company maintains a mailing address at P.O. Box 110310, Naples, Florida 34108-0106.  Other than this mailing address, the Company does not currently maintain any other office facilities, and does not anticipate the need for maintaining office facilities at any time in the foreseeable future.  The Company pays no rent for the use of this mailing address.  However, the policy of the Company with respect to investment in real estate assets could be changed in the future without a vote of security holders.  ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.  The Company is not a party to any pending legal proceedings, and no such proceedings are known to be contemplated. No director, officer or affiliate of the Company, and no owner of record or beneficial owner of more than 5.0% of the securities of the Company, or any associate of any such director, officer or security holder is a party adverse to the Company or has a material interest adverse to the Company in reference to pending litigation.  ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.  No matters were submitted to a vote of the security holders of the Company during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year which ended December 31, 2006.  PART II  ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND SMALL BUSINESS ISSUERS PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.  No public trading market exits for the Companys securities.  As of the date of this Form 10-KSB, the Companys securities are held of record by a total of approximately 29 persons.  No dividends have been paid to date and the Companys Board of Directors does not anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable future.  There have been no previously unreported sales of unregistered securities.  ITEM 6. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION.  SPECIAL NOTE OF CAUTION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS  CERTAIN STATEMENTS IN THIS REPORT, INCLUDING STATEMENTS IN THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION, ARE WHAT ARE KNOWN AS "FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS", WHICH ARE BASICALLY STATEMENTS ABOUT THE FUTURE. FOR THAT REASON, THESE STATEMENTS


7


INVOLVE RISK AND UNCERTAINTY SINCE NO ONE CAN ACCURATELY PREDICT THE FUTURE. WORDS SUCH AS "PLANS," "INTENDS," "WILL," "HOPES," "SEEKS," "ANTICIPATES," "EXPECTS "AND THE LIKE OFTEN IDENTIFY SUCH FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS, BUT ARE NOT THE ONLY INDICATION THAT A STATEMENT IS A FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENT. SUCH FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS INCLUDE STATEMENTS CONCERNING OUR PLANS AND OBJECTIVES WITH RESPECT TO THE PRESENT AND FUTURE OPERATIONS OF THE COMPANY, AND STATEMENTS WHICH EXPRESS OR IMPLY THAT SUCH PRESENT AND FUTURE OPERATIONS WILL OR MAY PRODUCE REVENUES, INCOME OR PROFITS. NUMEROUS FACTORS AND FUTURE EVENTS COULD CAUSE THE COMPANY TO CHANGE SUCH PLANS AND OBJECTIVES OR FAIL TO SUCCESSFULLY IMPLEMENT SUCH PLANS OR ACHIEVE SUCH OBJECTIVES, OR CAUSE SUCH PRESENT AND FUTURE OPERATIONS TO FAIL TO PRODUCE REVENUES, INCOME OR PROFITS. THEREFORE, THE READER IS ADVISED THAT THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION SHOULD BE CONSIDERED IN LIGHT OF THE DISCUSSION OF RISKS AND OTHER FACTORS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB AND IN THE COMPANY'S OTHER FILINGS WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. NO STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION SHOULD BE CONSTRUED AS A GUARANTEE OR ASSURANCE OF FUTURE PERFORMANCE OR FUTURE RESULTS.  Plan of Operation  On April 16, 2006, the Company became delinquent in filing its periodic reports and during the period from April 16, 2006 to December 31, 2007 was completely inactive.   Beginning in April, 2008, the Company elected to take the steps needed to again become current in filing its reports in order to pursue its original business plan of seeking to locate a suitable business acquisition candidate.  For the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008, the Company expects to initiate efforts to locate a suitable business acquisition candidate and thereafter to complete a business acquisition transaction.  The Company anticipates incurring a loss for the fiscal year as a result of expenses associated with compliance with the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and expenses associated with locating and evaluating acquisition candidates. The Company does not expect to generate revenues until it completes a business acquisition, and, depending upon the performance of the acquired business, it may also continue to operate at a loss after completion of a business combination.  During the next twelve (12) months, the Company will require additional capital in order to pay the costs associated with carrying out its plan of operations and the costs of compliance with its continuing reporting obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended.  This additional capital will be required whether or not the Company is able to complete a business combination transaction during the current fiscal year.  Furthermore, once a business combination is completed, the Companys needs for additional financing are likely to increase substantially.  No specific commitments to provide additional funds have been made by management or other stockholders, and the Company has no current plans, proposals, arrangements or understandings to raise additional capital through the sale or issuance of additional securities prior to the location of a merger or acquisition candidate.  Accordingly, there can be no assurance that any additional funds will be available to the Company to allow it to cover its expenses.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, to the extent that additional funds are required, the Company anticipates that it will either continue to rely on its majority shareholder to pay expenses on its behalf, or it will seek to raise capital through the private placement of restricted securities.  The majority shareholders are under no obligation to pay such expenses.  If the Company is unable to raise additional funds, it will not be able to pursue its business plan.  In addition, in order to minimize the amount of additional cash which is required in order to carry out its business plan, the Company might seek to compensate certain service


8


providers by issuances of stock in lieu of cash.  Liquidity and Capital Resources  As of December 31, 2006, the Company remains in the development stage.  As of December 31, 2006, the Companys balance sheet reflects total assets of $nil and total current liabilities of $16,000.  The Company has cash on hand of $nil and a deficit accumulated in the development stage of $23,808.  The Company does not have sufficient assets or capital resources to pay its on-going expenses while it is seeking out business opportunities, and it has no current plans to raise additional capital through sale of securities.  As a result, although the Company has no agreement in place with its shareholders or other persons to pay expenses on its behalf, it is anticipated that the Company will continue to rely on its majority shareholders to pay expenses on its behalf at least until it is able to consummate a business transaction.  The majority shareholders are under no obligation to pay such expenses.   Subsequent Event  As reported on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 8, 2008, on May 5, 2008, Merci entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (the "Agreement") with L.J.  Loeffler Inc., ("Loeffler") a New York corporation, and the shareholders of Loeffler (the "Shareholder").  Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the Shareholder agreed to transfer all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock in Loeffler to the Company in exchange for the issuance of 13,238,200 shares of outstanding common stock in the Company to the Shareholder, thereby causing  Loeffler to become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.  Loeffler's obligations under the Agreement are contingent upon the Company becoming current in its filings required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Public Reports").  In the event  that the  Company  does not become current  in the  Public  Reports  on or  before  July  31,  2008,  Loeffler  may unilaterally  terminate the Agreement.  In addition to the foregoing terms, each of the Company, Loeffler and the Shareholder provided customary representations and warranties and, pre-closing covenants and closing conditions.  Closing under the Agreement shall occur on or before July 31, 2008 or such other date as the Parties to the Agreement may agree.  As of the date of the filing of this report, Loeffler has not terminated the Agreement, and the parties have not yet set a new closing date.  Off Balance Sheet Arrangements  The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.  ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.


9


MERCI, INC. (A Development Stage Company) AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006 INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS     INDEX    PageReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm11Balance sheet12Statements of operations13Statements of stockholders (deficit)/ equity14Statements of cash flows15Notes to financial statements16  23                       10       REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of Merci, Inc.  We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Merci, Inc. (a development stage enterprise)(the Company) as of December 31, 2006 and related statements of operations, stockholders deficit, and cash flows for the period August 20, 1997 (inception) through December 31, 2006. These financial statements are the responsibility of the companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. The financial statements as of December 31, 2004 and for the year ended December 31, 2005 were audited by other auditors whose report dated March 24, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion on those statements.  Our opinion on the statements of operations, cash flows and stockholders' deficit for the period since August 20, 1997 (Date of Inception) to December 31, 2006 insofar as it relates to amounts for the prior periods through December 31, 2004 is based on the report of the other auditors.  We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.  In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Merci, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) as of December 31, 2006 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the period August 20, 1997 (inception) through December 31, 2006, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed further in Note 3, the Company has been in the development stage since its inception (August 20, 1997) and continues to incur significant losses. The Company's viability is dependent upon its ability to obtain future financing and the success of its future operations. These factors raise substantial doubt as to the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plan in regard to these matters is also described in Note 3. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.  /s/Lake & Associates CPAs LLC  Lake & Associates, CPAs LLC Schaumburg, Illinois August 11, 2008      11      Merci Inc.(A Development Stage Company)BALANCE SHEETAs of December 31, 2006ASSETS20062005CURRENTS ASSETSCash$             -$              -TOTAL ASSETS$             -$              -LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICITCURRENT LIABILITIESAcrued Expenses$      2,000$       1,500Payable to Stockholder14,00013,000TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES16,00014,500TOTAL LIABILITIES$    16,000$     14,500STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICITPreferred stock:  par value $.01; 5,000,000 shares authorized;no shares issued and outstanding--Common stock: par value $.001; 25,000,000 shares authorized;2,647,640 shares issued and outstanding2,6482,648Addiitonal paid in capital5,1605,160Deficit accumulated during the development stage(23,808)(22,308)TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT(16,000)(14,500)TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT$             -$              -The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.    12      Merci Inc.(A Development Stage Company)STATEMENT OF OPERATIONSFor the Period August 20, 1997 (inception) through December 31, 2006For the Years Ended
December 31,Cumulative Amount from August 20, 1997 (inception) to December 31,200620052006REVENUESSales$                -$               -$                      -OPERATING EXPENSESAdministrative and General1,5008,00023,808TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES1,5008,00023,808NET OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES(1,500)(8,000)(23,808)PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES---NET INCOME (LOSS)$        (1,500)$       (8,000)$            (23,808)INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE (Basic and Diluted)(0.001)(0.001)(0.001)WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING7,491,3507,491,3507,491,350The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.              13      Merci Inc.(A Development Stage Company)STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)For the Period August 20, 1997 (inception) through December 31, 2006Common StockAdditionalRetainedTotalPar Value of $0.001Paid-inEarningsStockholders'SharesAmountCapital(Deficit)EquityBalance at August 20, 1997 (date of inception)-$               -$              -$             -$                  -Common stock issued for services670,610671671Net loss for the period---(671)(671)Balance December 31, 1997670,610671-(671)-Net loss for the year-----Balance December 31, 1998670,610671-(671)-Common stock issued for cash1,928,7801,9291,633-3,562Net loss for the year---(2,318)(2,318)Balance December 31, 19992,599,3902,6001,633(2,989)1,244Common stock issued for cash48,250483,5273,575Net loss for the year---(3,015)(3,015)Balance December 31, 20002,647,6402,6485,160(6,004)1,804Net loss for the year---(1,304)(1,304)Balance December 31, 20012,647,6402,6485,160(7,308)500Net loss for the year---(500)(500)Balance December 31, 20022,647,6402,6485,160(7,808)-Net loss for the year-----Balance December 31, 20032,647,6402,6485,160(7,808)-Net loss for the year---(6,500)(6,500)Balance December 31, 20042,647,6402,6485,160(14,308)(6,500)Net loss for the year---(8,000)(8,000)Balance December 31, 20052,647,6402,6485,160(22,308)(14,500)Net loss for the year---(1,500)(1,500)Balance December 31, 20062,647,640$          2,648$         5,160$     (23,808)$             (16,000)The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.   14      Merci Inc.(A Development Stage Company)STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWSFor the Period August 20, 1997 (inception) through December 31, 2006For the Years Ended
December 31,Cumulative Amount from August 20, 1997 (inception) to December 31,200620052006CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIESNet Income (Loss)$        (1,500)$       (8,000)$           (23,808)Adjustment used to reconcile net loss tonet cash used in operations:Stock issued for services--671Accrued expenses5001,5002,000NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES(1,000)(6,500)(21,137)CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES---CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES---Increase in payable to stockholder1,0006,50014,000Issuance of common stock--7,137Net cash provided by financing activities1,0006,50021,137NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS---CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTSBeginning of Year---End of Year$                -$               -$                      -Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:Cash paid for interest$              -$             -$                    -Cash paid for income taxes$              -$             -$                    -The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.    15     Merci Inc. (A Development Stage Company) NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FROM INCEPTION (AUGUST 20, 1997) THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2006  Note 1 - Organization  Merci, Inc. (the "Company") is currently a development stage company under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 7 and was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on August 20, 1997.  Note 2  Significant Accounting Policies  Basis of Presentation - Development Stage Company  The Company has not earned any revenue from operations.  Accordingly, the Company's activities have been accounted for as those of a "Development Stage Enterprise" as set forth in Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 7 ("SFAS 7"). Among the disclosures required by SFAS 7 are that the Company's financial statements be identified as those of a development stage company, and that the statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows disclose activity since the date of the Company's inception.  Accounting Method  The Company's financial statements are prepared using the accrual method of accounting. The Company has elected a fiscal year ending on December 31.   Use of Estimates  The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods.  Actual results could differ from these estimates.  Cash Equivalents  Cash equivalents include all highly liquid debt instruments with original maturities of three months or less which are not securing any corporate obligations.   Fair Value of Financial Instruments  The estimated fair values of cash, property and equipment and due to stockholder, none of which are held for trading purposes, approximate their carrying value because of the short term maturity of these instruments or the stated interest rates are indicative of market interest rates.  Concentration of Credit Risk  The Company places its cash with high quality financial institutions and at times may exceed the FDIC $100,000 insurance limit.  The Company will extend credit based on an evaluation of the customers financial condition, generally without collateral.  Exposure to losses on receivables is principally dependent on each customers financial condition.  The Company will monitor its exposure for credit losses and maintains allowances for anticipated losses, if required.   16      Advertising Costs  Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. There were no advertising expenses for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005.  Income Taxes  The Company accounts for income taxes under SFAS 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes." Under the asset and liability method of SFAS 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statements carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under SFAS 109, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period the enactment occurs. A valuation allowance is provided for certain deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize tax assets through future operations.  Basic and Diluted Income/(Loss) Per Share:  In accordance with SFAS No. 128, "Earnings Per Share," the basic income/(loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income/(loss) available to common stockholders by the  weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted income per common share is computed similar to basic income per common share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. As of December 31, 2006, the Company does not have any equity or debt instruments outstanding that can be converted into common stock.  Stock-Based Compensation  In March 2004, the FASB issued a proposed statement, Share-Based Payment, which addresses the accounting for share-based payment transactions in which an enterprise receives employee services in exchange for equity instruments of the enterprise or liabilities that are based on the grant-date fair value of the enterprise's equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of such equity instruments. The proposed statement would eliminate the ability to account for share-based compensation transactions using Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and generally would require instead that such transactions be accounted for using a fair-value-based method. In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, which is a revision of SFAS No. 123. Generally, the approach in SFAS No. 123(R) is similar to the approach described in SFAS No. 123. However, SFAS No. 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their grant-date fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative.  As permitted by SFAS No. 123, for 2005, the Company accounted for share-based payments to employees using APB Opinion No. 25's intrinsic value method and, as such, generally recognized no compensation cost for employee stock options.  Effective January 1, 2006, we have adopted SFAS No. 123(R)'s fair value method of accounting for share based payments. Accordingly, the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R)'s fair value method may have a significant impact on the Company's results of operations as we are required to recognize the cost of employee services received in exchange for awards of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair  value of those awards. SFAS No. 123(R) permits public companies to adopt its requirements using either the "modified prospective" method or the "modified retrospective" method.    17     The Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective method. In April 2005, the SEC delayed the effective date of SFAS No. 123(R), which is now effective for public companies for annual, rather than interim periods that begin after June 15, 2005. The impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) cannot be predicted at this time because it will depend on levels of share-based payments granted in the future.  Segment Reporting  Based on the Company's integration and management strategies, the Company operated in a single business segment. For the years  ended December 31, 2005 and 2006, the Company had no revenue.  Revenue Recognition  Revenue is recognized in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements.  The Company recognizes revenue when the significant risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the customer pursuant to applicable laws and regulations, including factors such as when there has  been evidence of a sales arrangement, the performance has occurred, or service have been rendered, the price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured.  Reporting on the Costs of Start-Up Activities  Statement of Position 98-5 (SOP 98-5), Reporting on the Costs of Start-Up Activities, which provides guidance on the financial reporting of start-up costs and organizational costs, requires most costs of start-up activities and organizational costs to be expensed as incurred.  SOP 98-5 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1998.  With the adoption of SOP 98-5, there has been little or no effect on the Companys financial statements.  Dividends  The Company has not yet adopted any policy regarding payment of dividends.  No dividends have been paid or declared since inception.  New Accounting Pronouncements  In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, "Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29" effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2006. SFAS No. 153 requires that exchanges of productive assets be accounted for at fair value unless fair value cannot be reasonably determined or the transaction lacks commercial substance. SFAS No. 153 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.  In March, 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation ("FIN") No. 47, "Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations-an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143" ("FIN No. 47"). FIN No. 47 clarifies the timing of liability recognition for legal obligations associated with the retirement of a tangible long-lived asset when the timing and/or method of settlement are conditional on a future event.  FIN No. 47 is effective for us no later than December 31, 2005. We do not expect that the adoption of FIN No. 47 will have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.  In May, 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, "Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, a replacement of APB No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3" ("SFAS No. 154"). SFAS No. 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods' financial statements of a voluntary change in accounting principle unless it is impracticable. APB Opinion No. 20 "Accounting Changes" previously required that most voluntary changes in accounting principle be recognized by including in net income of the period of the change the cumulative effect of   18     changing to the new accounting principle. This statement is effective for our Company as of January 1, 2006.  In February 2006, FASB issued SFAS No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments. SFAS No. 155 amends SFAS No 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and SFAF No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. SFAS No. 155, permits fair value re-measurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation, clarifies which interest-only strips and principal-only strips are not subject to the requirements of SFAS No. 133, establishes a requirement to evaluate interest in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation.  It clarifies that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded derivatives, and amends SFAS No. 140 to eliminate the prohibition on the qualifying special-purpose entity from holding a derivative financial instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest other than another derivative financial instrument. This statement is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of the Companys first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. The adoption of SFAS No. 155 is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys results of operations or financial position.  In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48) which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute, as well as criteria for subsequently recognizing, derecognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions for financial statement purposes. FIN 48 also requires expanded disclosure with respect to the uncertainty in income tax assets and liabilities. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, which will be the Companys calendar year 2007, and is required to be recognized as a change in accounting principle through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the year of adoption. The adoption of FIN 48 is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys consolidated results of operations or financial position.  In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) ratified the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 06-3, How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income Statement (That Is, Gross versus Net Presentation). EITF Issue No. 06-3 requires that the presentation of taxes within revenue-producing transactions between a seller and a customer, including but not limited to sales, use, value added, and some excise taxes, should be on either a gross (included in revenue and cost) or a net (excluded from revenue) basis. In addition, for any such taxes that are reported on a gross basis, a company should disclose the amounts of those taxes in interim and annual financial statements for each period for which an income statement is presented if those amounts are significant. The disclosure of those taxes can be done on an aggregate basis. EITF Issue No. 06-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, which will be the Companys calendar year 2007. The adoption of EITF Issue No. 06-3 is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys results of operations or financial position.  In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No.108 (SAB No. 108), Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Current Year Misstatements. SAB No. 108 requires analysis of misstatements using both an income statement (rollover) approach and a balance sheet (iron curtain) approach in assessing materiality and provides for a one-time cumulative effect transition adjustment. SAB No. 108 is effective for the fiscal year beginning November 15, 2006. The adoption of SAB No. 108 is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys results of operations or financial position.  In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156. This Statement amends FASB Statement No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, with respect to the accounting for separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. This Statement is effective as of the beginning of its first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. An entity should apply the requirements for recognition and initial measurement of servicing assets and servicing liabilities prospectively to all transactions after the effective date of this Statement.   19      In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157 and No. 158. Statement No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, the Board having previously concluded in those accounting pronouncements that fair value is the relevant measurement attribute. Accordingly, this Statement does not require any new fair value measurements. However, for some entities, the application of this Statement will change current practice.  Statement No. 158 is an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R). It improves financial reporting by requiring an employer to recognize the over funded or under funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan (other than a multi-employer plan) as an asset or liability in its statement of financial position and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income of a business entity or changes in unrestricted net assets of a not-for-profit organization. This Statement also improves financial reporting by requiring an employer to measure the funded status of a plan as of the date of its year-end statement of financial position, with limited exceptions.  The Company does not expect application of SFAS No. 156, 157 and 158 to have a material effect on its financial statements.  In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (SFAS No. 159).  This statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value.  Companies should report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting date.  This statement is effective as of the beginning of an entitys first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007.  The Company is currently assessing the potential impact, if any, for the adoption of SFAS No.159 on its financial statements.  In December 2007, the FASB issued two new statements: (a.) SFAS No. 141(revised 2007), Business Combinations, and (b.) No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements.  These statements are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and the application of these standards will improve, simplify and converge internationally the accounting for business combinations and the reporting of noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements.  The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact, if any, on SFAS 141 (R) and SFAS 160 and does not anticipate that the adoption of these standards will have any impact on its consolidated financial statements.  (a.)  SFAS No. 141 (R) requires an acquiring entity in a business combination to: (i) recognize all (and only) the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed in the transaction, (ii) establish an acquisition-date fair value as the measurement objective for all assets acquired and the liabilities assumed, and (iii) disclose to investors and other users all of the information they will need to evaluate and understand the nature of, and the financial effect of, the business combination, and, (iv) recognize and measure the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase.  (b.) SFAS No. 160 will improve the relevance, comparability and transparency of financial information provided to investors by requiring all entities to: (i) report noncontrolling (minority) interests in subsidiaries in the same manner, as equity but separate from the parents equity, in consolidated financial statements, (ii) net income attributable to the parent and to the non-controlling interest must be clearly identified and presented on the face of the consolidated statement of income, and (iii) any changes in the parents ownership interest while the parent retains the controlling financial interest in its subsidiary be accounted for consistently.  Note 3 - Going concern  The Company has had no significant operations, assets or liabilities since inception and,  accordingly,  is fully   20     dependent upon either future sales of securities or upon its current management and/or advances or loans from significant stockholders or corporate officers  to  provide  sufficient  working  capital to  preserve  the integrity of the corporate entity.  Because of these factors, our auditors have issued an audit opinion for the Company which  includes a statement  describing our going concern  status.  This means, in our auditors opinion, substantial doubt about our ability to  continue  as a going  concern  exists at the date of their opinion. The Companys continued existence is dependent upon its ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations to support its daily operations as well as provide sufficient resources to retire existing liabilities and obligations on a timely basis.  The Company anticipates offering future sales of equity securities.  However, there is no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain additional funding through the sales of additional  equity  securities  or, that such  funding,  if available, will be obtained on terms favorable to or affordable by the Company.  If no additional operating capital is received during the next twelve months, the Company  will be  forced  to rely on  existing  cash in the  bank  and upon additional funds  loaned  by  management  and/or  significant  stockholders  to preserve the integrity of the corporate  entity at this time. In the event, the Company is unable to acquire advances from management and/or significant stockholders, the Company's ongoing operations would be negatively impacted.  It  is  the  intent  of  management  and  significant  stockholders  to  provide sufficient working  capital  necessary to support and preserve the integrity of the corporate entity.  However, no formal commitments or arrangements to advance or loan funds to the Company or repay any such advances or loans exist. There is no legal obligation for either management or significant stockholders to provide additional future funding.  In such a restricted cash flow scenario, the Company would be unable to complete our  business  plan  steps,  and  would,  instead,   delay  all  cash  intensive activities.  Without necessary cash flow, the Company may become dormant during the next twelve months, or until such time as necessary funds could be raised in the equity securities market.  While the Company is of the opinion that good faith estimates of the Companys ability to secure additional capital in the future to reach our goals have been made, there is no guarantee that the Company will receive sufficient funding to sustain operations or implement any future business plan steps.  The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern.  As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has incurred an accumulated deficit of $ 20,808 for the period from August 20, 1997 (inception) to December 31, 2005.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts of and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue in existence. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.  These financial statements do not include any adjustments that might arise from this uncertainty. Note 4  Payable to stockholder A stockholder has paid expenses on behalf of the Company.  Those payments consisted of general and administrative expenses incurred to maintain corporate existence.  At December 31, 2005, the Company owed $13,000 to the stockholder.  The amount bears no interest and is payable on demand. Note 5  Stock Based Compensation 2001 COMPENSATORY STOCK OPTION PLAN On February 14, 2001, the Company adopted its 2001 Compensatory Stock Option Plan.  Pursuant to the   21     2001 plan, the Company may grant nonstatutory (nonqualified) stock options to employees of the Company.  A total of 2,000,000 shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance under the Plan. The maximum term of options granted under the 2001 Compensatory Stock Option Plan is five years.  Options granted are nontransferable and generally expire within six months after termination of the grantees employment. The exercise price of compensatory stock options must not be less than fair value of the common stock on the date of the grant.  The authority to grant new options under the Plan will terminate on February 13, 2011, unless the Plan is terminated prior to that time by the board of directors. To date, no compensatory stock options have been granted pursuant to the Plan. 2001 EMPLOYEE STOCK COMPENSATION PLAN On February 14, 2001, the Company adopted its 2001 Employee Stock Compensation Plan.  Pursuant to the 2001 plan, the Company may issue shares of its common stock to employees or others who provide services to the Company.  A total of 1,500,000 shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance under the Plan. The authority to grant shares of common stock under the Plan will terminate on February 13, 2011, unless the Plan is terminated prior to that time by the board of directors. To date, no shares of common stock have been granted pursuant to the Plan. Note 6  Income Taxes The Company accounts for income taxes under Statement and Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS No. 109), which requires use of the liability method.   SFAS No. 109 provides that deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on the differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes, referred to as temporary differences.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities at the end of each period are determined using the currently enacted tax rates applied to taxable income in the periods in which the deferred tax assets and liabilities are expected to be settled or realized. The provision for income taxes differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to income before provision for income taxes.  The sources and tax effects of the differences are as follows: U.S. federal statutory rate (34.0%) Valuation reserve 34.0% Total -% As of December 31, 2005, the Company has a net operating loss carryforward of $ 20,808.         ...  Note 7  Related party transactions  A stockholder has paid expenses on behalf of the Company.  Those expenses consisted solely of professional fees incident to maintaining corporate existence.  At December 31, 2005, the Company owed $ 13,000 to the stockholder.  The amount bears no interest and is payable on demand.    22     The Company does not lease or rent any property.  Office space and services are provided without charge by a director and shareholder.  Such costs are immaterial to the financial statements and, accordingly, have not been reflected therein.  The officers and directors of the Company are involved in other business activities and may, in the future, become involved in other business opportunities.  If a specific business opportunity becomes available, such persons may face a conflict in selecting between the Company and their other business interests.  The Company has not formulated a policy for the resolution of such conflicts.        23     ITEM 8. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE  As reported on Forms 8/K and 8/K filed with the SEC on 9/18/2006 and 7/15/2008, respectively, the Company changed its auditors.  There have been no disagreements with our accountants on accounting and financial disclosure.  ITEM 8A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.  The Securities and Exchange Commission defines the term disclosure controls and procedures to mean a company's controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to the issuers management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.  The Company maintains such a system of controls and procedures in an effort to ensure that all information which it is required to disclose in the reports it files under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified under the SEC's rules and forms and that information required to be disclosed is accumulated and communicated to principal executive and principal financial officers to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.  On April 16, 2006, the Company became delinquent in filing its periodic reports and during the period from April 16, 2006 to December 31, 2007, was completely inactive.  Accordingly, no timely evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our controls and procedures was performed as of the end of the period covered by this delinquent report.  However, in conjunction with the preparation and filing of this delinquent report, we carried out a retroactive evaluation, under supervision of our president and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report.    Based on this evaluation, our president and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving the objectives of timely alerting them to material information required to be included in our periodic SEC reports and of ensuring that such information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported with the time periods specified.  Our president and chief financial officer also concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report to provide reasonable assurance of the achievement of these objectives.  There was no change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.  ITEM 8B.     OTHER INFORMATION.  None.  PART III  ITEM 9. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT.   24      The directors and executive officers currently serving the Company are as follows:  NameAgePositions heldJose Acevedo48President, Chief Financial Officer, Director  The directors named above will serve until the next annual meeting of the Company's stockholders. Thereafter, directors will be elected for one-year terms at the annual stockholders' meeting. Officers will hold their positions at the pleasure of the board of directors, absent any employment agreement, of which none currently exists or is contemplated. There is no arrangement or understanding between any of the directors or officers of the Company and any other person pursuant to which any director or officer was or is to be selected as a director or officer, and there is no arrangement, plan or understanding as to whether non-management shareholders will exercise their voting rights to continue to elect the current directors to the Company's board. There are also no arrangements, agreements or understandings between non-management shareholders and management under which non-management shareholders may directly or indirectly participate in or influence the management of the Company's affairs.  The directors and officers will devote their time to the Company's affairs on an "as needed" basis, which, depending on the circumstances, could amount to as little as two hours per month, or more than forty hours per month, but more than likely will fall within the range of five to ten hours per month. There are no agreements or understandings for any officer or director to resign at the request of another person, and none of the officers or directors are acting on behalf of, or will act at the direction of, any other person.  Biographical Information  Jose Acevedo  Jose Acevedo is 48 years old and holds a Bachelors degree in finance from Trinity University.  Mr. Acevedo serves as our president, chief financial officer and director.  In addition to the work he performs for the Company, Mr. Acevedo is currently a Supervisor in a State run detention facility.  Mr. Acevedo was employed by Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company from 1977 through 1999.  During that period, Manufacturers Hanover Trust merged with Chemical Bank, and subsequently Chase Manhattan Bank, to become the nations largest bank. At Chase Manhattan, Mr. Acevedo held a management position where he managed portfolios valued at $34 million dollars.  From 1999-2005, Mr. Acevedo was a free-lance corporation consultant.  Family Relationships  There are no family relationships between any of the current directors or officers of the Company.  Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings  None of our officers, directors, promoters or control persons has been involved in the past five (5) years in any of the following:  (1) Any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;  (2) Any conviction in a criminal proceedings or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);   25      (3) Being subject to any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, or any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; or  (4) Being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the SEC or the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities laws or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated.  Directorships  In addition to serving as a director of the Company, Jose Acevedo serves as a director of Basset Enterprises, Inc., Our Glass, Inc., and Tranquility, Inc.  Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act  Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires the Company's officers and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of the Company's equity securities, to file reports of ownership of Form 3 and changes in ownership on Form 4 or Form 5 with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Such officers, directors and 10% stockholders are also required by SEC rules to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.  Based upon a review of all filings regarding the Company which have been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, , the Company believes that Form 3 Initial Statements of Beneficial Ownership for Jose Acevedo, Mid-Continental Securities Corp., and Glen Little, have not been filed as required.  Code of Ethics  The Company has not yet adopted a code of ethics.  The Company intends to adopt a code of ethics in the near future.   ITEM 10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.  No officer or director received any remuneration from the Company during the fiscal year.  Until the Company acquires additional capital, it is not intended that any officer or director will receive compensation from the Company other than reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses incurred on behalf of the Company.  The Company has no stock option, retirement, pension, or profit-sharing programs for the benefit of directors, officers or other employees, but the Board of Directors may recommend adoption of one or more such programs in the future.  ITEM 11. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.  The following table sets forth, as of the end of the Company's most recent fiscal year, the number of shares of Common Stock owned of record and beneficially by executive officers, directors and persons who hold 5.0% or more of the outstanding Common Stock of the Company.  Also included are the shares held by all executive officers and directors as a group.  Name and AddressNumber of Shares Owned BeneficiallyPercent of Class Owned   26      Glenn A. Little
211 W. Wall St.
Midland, Texas 79701-45061,000,00037.769%Mid-Continental Securities Corp.
5150 Tamiami Trl N Ste 202
Naples, Florida 34108-01061,078,09040.719%Jose Acevedo (1)
312 E 206th St #H
Bronx, NY 1046700.00%All directors and executive officers (1 persons)00.00% (1) The person listed is an officer, a director, or both, of the Company.  ITEM 12.  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS  No officer, director, promoter, or affiliate of the Company has, or proposes to have, any direct or indirect material interest in any asset proposed to be acquired by the Company through security holdings, contracts, options, or otherwise. The Company has adopted a policy under which any consulting or finder's fee that may be paid to a third party for consulting services to assist management in evaluating a prospective business opportunity would be paid in stock rather than in cash. Any such issuance of stock would be made on an ad hoc basis. Accordingly, the Company is unable to predict whether, or in what amount, such a stock issuance might be made.  It is not currently anticipated that any salary, consulting fee, or finder's fee shall be paid to any of the Company's directors or executive officers, or to any other affiliate of the Company except as described under "Executive Compensation" above.  The Company does not maintain an office, but it does maintain a mailing address at P.O. Box 110310, Naples, Florida 34108-0106, for which it pays no rent, and for which it does not anticipate paying rent in the future. It is likely that the Company will not establish an office until it has completed a business acquisition transaction, but it is not possible to predict what arrangements will actually be made with respect to future office facilities.  ITEM 13. EXHIBITS  (a) Exhibits.   3(i) Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference from Registration Statement on Form 10-SB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 13, 2005).  3(ii) Bylaws (incorporated by reference from Registration Statement on Form 10-SB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 13, 2005).  31.1 Certifications pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*  31.2 Certifications pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of   27     2002.*  32.1 Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*  32.2 Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*  * Filed Herewith   ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES  Audit Fees  (1) The aggregate fees billed by Lake and Associates CPAs LLC for audit of the Company's annual financial statements were $1,000 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, and $1,000 by Lake and Associates CPAs LLC for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.  Audit Related Fees  (2) Lake and Associates CPAs LLC did not bill the Company any amounts for assurance and related services that were related to its audit or review of the Companys financial statements during the fiscal years ended 2006 and 2005.  Tax Fees  (3) The aggregate fees billed by Lake and Associates CPAs LLC for tax compliance, advice and planning were $0.00 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 and $0.00 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.  All Other Fees  (4) Lake and Associates CPAs LLC did not bill the Company for any products and services other than the foregoing during the fiscal years ended 2006 and 2005.  Audit Committee=s Pre-approval Policies and Procedures  (5) Merci, Inc., a blind pool reporting company which is not yet publicly traded, does not have an audit committee per se. The current board of directors functions as the audit committee.    28     SIGNATURES  In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.  MERCI, INC.  By:  /S/ Jose Acevedo Jose Acevedo, President  Date: August 19, 2008  By:  /S/ Jose Acevedo Jose Acevedo, Chief Financial Officer  Date: August 19, 2008    29