alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Официален вестник C 391/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0855 |
| --- | --- |
| Официален вестник
  на Европейския съюз | C 391 |
| | |
| Издание на български език | Информация и известия | Година 6316 ноември 2020 г. |

ISSN 1977-0855

Официален вестник

на Европейския съюз

C 391

Издание на български език

Информация и известия

Година 6316 ноември 2020 г.

---

| Съдържание | Страница |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Информация |
| | ИНФОРМАЦИЯ ОТ ИНСТИТУЦИИТЕ, ОРГАНИТЕ, СЛУЖБИТЕ И АГЕНЦИИТЕ НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ СЪЮЗ |
| | Съвет |
| 2020/C 391/01 | Решение на Съвета от 10 ноември 2020 година за назначаване на председателя на апелативните състави на Службата на Европейския съюз за интелектуална собственост | 1 |

Съдържание

Страница

IV   Информация

ИНФОРМАЦИЯ ОТ ИНСТИТУЦИИТЕ, ОРГАНИТЕ, СЛУЖБИТЕ И АГЕНЦИИТЕ НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ СЪЮЗ

Съвет

2020/C 391/01

Решение на Съвета от 10 ноември 2020 година за назначаване на председателя на апелативните състави на Службата на Европейския съюз за интелектуална собственост

1

---

| BG | |
| --- | --- |

BG

---

IV Информация

ИНФОРМАЦИЯ ОТ ИНСТИТУЦИИТЕ, ОРГАНИТЕ, СЛУЖБИТЕ И АГЕНЦИИТЕ НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ СЪЮЗ

Съвет

| 16.11.2020 | BG | Официален вестник на Европейския съюз | C 391/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2020

BG

Официален вестник на Европейския съюз

C 391/1

---

РЕШЕНИЕ НА СЪВЕТА

от 10 ноември 2020 година

за назначаване на председателя на апелативните състави на Службата на Европейския съюз за интелектуална собственост

(2020/C 391/01)

СЪВЕТЪТ НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ СЪЮЗ,

като взе предвид Договора за функционирането на Европейския съюз,

като взе предвид Регламент (ЕС) 2017/1001 на Европейския парламент и на Съвета от 14 юни 2017 г. относно марката на Европейския съюз (1), и по-специално член 166, параграф 1 от него,

като има предвид, че:

На 8 юни 2020 г. Съветът получи от управителния съвет на Службата на Европейския съюз за интелектуална собственост (EUIPO) списък с кандидати, предложени за длъжността председател на апелативните състави на EUIPO,

ПРИЕ НАСТОЯЩОТО РЕШЕНИЕ:

Член 1

1.   Г-н João Nuno MAROCO AMARAL NEGRÃO, роден в Лисабон (Португалия) на 2 ноември 1970 г., се назначава за председател на апелативните състави на Службата на Европейския съюз за интелектуална собственост (EUIPO) с мандат от пет години.

2.   Датата, от която започва да тече срокът на петгодишния мандат, посочен в първа алинея, се определя от управителния съвет на EUIPO.

Член 2

Настоящото решение влиза в сила в деня на публикуването му в Официален вестник на Европейския съюз.

Съставено в Брюксел на 10 ноември 2020 година.

За Съвета

Председател

M. ROTH

---

(1)  ОВ L 154, 16.6.2017 г., стр. 1.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2


Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer


of CNA Financial Corporation


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350


(As adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of CNA Financial Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:


|  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|• | the Company’squarterlyreport on Form10-Qfor thequarter ended June 30, 2014filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|  |                                                                                                                                                     
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|• | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:August 4, 2014By/s/ D. Craig MenseD. Craig MenseChief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
**EXHIBIT 10.3**Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) has entered into an agreement with each of thefollowing persons, which is substantially identical, except as set forth below, to the Form ofEmployment Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.8.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10(File No. 1-31650):Simon BiddiscombeRon CatesJay E. CormierRaouf Y. HalimGerald J. HamiltonThomas J. MedrekWayne K. NesbitThomas A. StitesThe multiple set forth in Section 6(i)(B) of the Employment Agreement for Mr. Halim is three andthe multiple set forth in Section 6(i)(B) of the Employment Agreement for the other persons is two.
§ 843.311 Annuity based on death of a separated employee. ( a ) Except as provided in § 843.312, if a separated employee who has completed at least 10 years of service dies after having separated from the service with title to a deferred annuity under § 842.212 of this chapter, but before having established a valid claim for an annuity, and is survived by a current spouse to whom he or she was married on the date of separation, the current spouse may elect to receive— ( 1 ) An annuity under paragraph (b) of this section; or
( 2 ) The unexpended balance, if the current spouse is the individual who would be entitled to the unexpended balance.
( b ) Except as provided in § 843.312 and paragraph (c) of this section, the current spouse annuity under this section equals 50 percent of an annuity computed under subpart D of part 842 of this chapter, for the separated employee. If the separated employee died before having attained the minimum retirement age, the computation is made as if the separated employee had attained the minimum retirement age.
( c ) ( 1 ) The current spouse annuity commences on the day after the separated employee would have attained— ( i ) Age 62 if the separated employee had less than 20 years of creditable service,
( ii ) Age 60 if the employee had at least 20 years of creditable service but less than 30 years of creditable service; or
( iii ) The minimum retirement age if the employee had at least 30 years of creditable service.
( 2 ) ( i ) The current spouse may elect to receive an adjusted annuity beginning on the day after the death of the separated employee.
( ii ) The rate of the adjusted annuity equals the annuity computed under paragraph (b) of this section multiplied by the factor in appendix A of this subpart for the age of the retiree as of the birthday before the retiree's death.
[52 FR 2074, Jan. 16, 1987, as amended at 52 FR 23014, June 17, 1987; 57 FR 54681, Nov. 20, 1992]
Exhibit 32.2

PROXIM CORPORATION  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael D. Angel, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Proxim Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (i) the accompanying annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended; and (ii) the information contained in such report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Proxim Corporation.

| | /s/MICHAEL D. ANGELMichael D. Angel
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:
March 16, 2005

---



QuickLinks
#### § 1034.140 Employment.

No qualified handicapped person shall, on the basis of handicap, be subjected to discrimination in employment under any program or activity conducted by the agency. The definitions, requirements, and procedures of section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791), as established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1613, shall apply to employment in federally conducted programs or activities.
#### § 1262.3 Requirements.

Each loose or separable magnet in a *subject magnet product* that fits entirely within the cylinder described in 16 CFR 1501.4 must have a flux index of less than 50 kG2 mm2 when tested in accordance with the method described in § 1262.4.
### §1306a. Public access to State disbursement records

No State or any agency or political subdivision thereof shall be deprived of any grant-in-aid or other payment to which it otherwise is or has become entitled pursuant to subchapter I (other than section 303(a)(3) thereof), IV, X, XIV, or XVI (other than section 1383(a)(3) thereof) of this chapter, by reason of the enactment or enforcement by such State of any legislation prescribing any conditions under which public access may be had to records of the disbursement of any such funds or payments within such State, if such legislation prohibits the use of any list or names obtained through such access to such records for commercial or political purposes.

(Oct. 20, 1951, ch. 521, title VI, §618, 65 Stat. 569; Pub. L. 86–778, title VI, §603(a), Sept. 13, 1960, 74 Stat. 992; Pub. L. 87–543, title I, §141(e), July 25, 1962, 76 Stat. 205.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 303(a)(3), referred to in text, was repealed by Pub. L. 97–35, title XXI, §2184(a)(4)(A), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 816.

Section 1383(a)(3), referred to in text, was in the original a reference to section 1603(a)(3) of the Social Security Act as added July 25, 1962, Pub. L. 87–543, title I, §141(a), 76 Stat. 200, and amended. That section was amended generally by Pub. L. 92–603, §301, Oct. 30, 1972, 86 Stat. 1478. However, the amendment by Pub. L. 92–603 was inapplicable to Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands, so that the prior section (which is set out as a note under section 1383 of this title) continues in effect for Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of act Oct. 20, 1951, popularly known as the Revenue Act of 1951, and not as part of the Social Security Act which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

1962—Pub. L. 87–543 substituted "XIV, or XVI (other than section 1383(a)(3) thereof)" for "or XIV".

1960—Pub. L. 86–778 inserted "(other than section 303(a)(3) thereof)" after "pursuant to subchapter I".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1960 Amendment

Pub. L. 86–778, title VI, §603(b), Sept. 13, 1960, 74 Stat. 992, provided that: "The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall take effect October 1, 1960."
No: II-14-042 August 11, 2014

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417

 Joey Ledford 404-997-4416

NRC Assigns New Resident Inspector to Hatch Nuclear Power Plant 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Atlanta have selected Dustin Retterer as the 

resident inspector for Southern Nuclear Operating Co.’s Hatch nuclear power plant, located near 

Baxley, Ga.

 The Hatch plant is located in south Georgia about 20 miles south of Vidalia, and Retterer joins 

NRC Senior Resident Inspector Dave Hardage.

Retterer joined the NRC in 2012 as a project engineer in 

the Resident Inspector Development Program in the Region II 

office. Prior to joining the agency, Retterer served in the U.S. 

Navy where he had six years of experience operating, auditing 

and maintaining Navy nuclear reactors. That time included four 

years on the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln, involving

multiple deployments and several months in the shipyard 

installing reactor plant alterations and performing maintenance.

Retterer graduated magna cum laude and received a 

Bachelor of Science in electrical engineering from the University of Tennessee.

“Dustin Retterer has the dedication and experience to carry out the NRC mission of protecting 

people and the environment by helping ensure the safety of the Hatch plant,” said NRC Region II 

Administrator Victor McCree.

At least two NRC resident inspectors are assigned to each operating U.S. commercial nuclear 

plant. They serve as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major 

work projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. Resident inspectors can serve at one 

site for up to seven years.

The Hatch resident inspectors can be reached at 912-367-9881.
§ 923.52 Consideration of the national interest in facilities. ( a ) The management program must provide for adequate consideration of the national interest involved in planning for, and managing the coastal zone, including the siting of facilities such as energy facilities which are of greater than local significance. In the case of energy facilities, the State must have considered any applicable national or interstate energy plan or program.
( b ) The primary purpose of this requirement is to assure adequate consideration by States of the national interest involved in the planning for and siting of facilities (which are necessary to meet other than local requirements) during: ( 1 ) The development of the State's management program,
( 2 ) The review and approval of the program by the Assistant Administrator, and
( 3 ) The implementation of the program as such facilities are proposed.
( c ) In order to fulfill this requirement, States must: ( 1 ) Describe the national interest in the planning for and siting of facilities considered during program development.
( 2 ) Indicate the sources relied upon for a description of the national interest in the planning for and siting of the facilities.
( 3 ) Indicate how and where the consideration of the national interest is reflected in the substance of the management program. In the case of energy facilities in which there is a national interest, the program must indicate the consideration given any national or interstate energy plans or programs which are applicable to or affect a state's coastal zone.
( 4 ) Describe the process for continued consideration of the national interest in the planning for and siting of facilities during program implementation, including a clear and detailed description of the administrative procedures and decisions points where such interest will be considered.
§ 16.7 Meetings. ( a ) The Commission shall designate an officer or employee of the Federal Government as the Designated Federal Officer for the advisory committee. The Designated Federal Officer shall attend the meetings of the advisory committee, and shall adjourn committee meetings whenever he or she determines that adjournment is in the public interest. The Commission, in its discretion, may authorize the Designated Federal Officer to chair meetings of the advisory committee.
( b ) No meeting of any advisory committee shall be held except at the call of, or with the advance approval of, the Designated Federal Officer and with an agenda approved by such official.
( c ) The agenda required by paragraph (b) of this section shall identify, in general terms, matters to be considered at the meeting and shall indicate whether any part of the meeting will concern matters that the General Counsel has determined to be covered by one or more of the exemptions of the Sunshine Act.
( d ) Timely notice of each meeting of the advisory committee shall be provided in accordance with § 16.9 of this part.
( e ) Subject to the provisions of § 16.8 of this part, each meeting of an advisory committee as defined in § 16.2(b) of this part shall be open to the public. Subcommittees and subgroups that are not utilized by the Commission for the purpose of obtaining advice or recommendations do not constitute advisory committees within the meaning of § 16.2(b) and are not subject to the meeting and other requirements of this part.
( f ) Meetings that are completely or partly open to the public shall be held at reasonable times and at places that are reasonably accessible to members of the public. The size of the meeting room shall be sufficient to accommodate members of the public who can reasonably be expected to attend.
( g ) Any member of the public shall be permitted to file a written statement with the committee concerning any matter to be considered in a meeting. Interested persons may be permitted by the committee chairman to speak at such meetings in accordance with procedures established by the committee and subject to the time constraints under which the meeting is to be conducted.
( h ) No meeting of any advisory committee shall be held in the absence of a quorum. Unless otherwise established by statute or in the charter of the committee, a quorum shall consist of a majority of the committee's authorized membership.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

KELVIN AVILA, 

Defendant Below, 

Appellant, 

v. 

STATE OF DELAWARE, 

Appellee. 

§ 

§ 

§ No. 289, 2021 

§ 

§ Court Below—Superior Court 

§ of the State of Delaware 

§ 

§ Cr. ID No. 1910001773 (N) 

§ 

§ 

§

Submitted: February 9, 2022 

Decided: March 31, 2022 

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and TRAYNOR, Justices. 

ORDER

After consideration of the brief and motion to withdraw filed by the 

appellant’s counsel under Supreme Court Rule 26(c), the State’s response, and the 

record on appeal, it appears to the Court that: 

(1) On February 11, 2021, the appellant, Kelvin Avila, pleaded guilty to 

first-degree assault. In exchange for the guilty plea, the State dismissed a charge of 

possession of a deadly weapon during the commission of a felony. The State also 

agreed to cap the amount of prison time it recommended at sentencing at five years. 

On August 20, 2021, the Superior Court sentenced Avila to ten years of 

imprisonment, suspended after four years for one year of Level III probation. This 

is Avila’s direct appeal. 
2

(2) On appeal, Avila’s counsel has filed a brief and a motion to withdraw 

under Supreme Court Rule 26(c). Avila’s counsel asserts that, based upon a 

conscientious review of the record and the law, the appeal is wholly without merit. 

In his statement filed under Rule 26(c), counsel indicates that he informed Avila of 

the provisions of Rule 26(c) and provided him with a copy of the motion to withdraw 

and the accompanying brief. Counsel also informed Avila of his right to submit 

points he wanted this Court to consider on appeal. Avila has not submitted any 

points for the Court’s consideration. The State has responded to the Rule 26(c) brief 

and argues that the Superior Court’s judgment should be affirmed. 

(3) When reviewing a motion to withdraw and an accompanying brief 

under Rule 26(c), this Court must be satisfied that the appellant’s counsel has made 

a conscientious examination of the record and the law for arguable claims.1 This 

Court must also conduct its own review of the record and determine whether “the 

appeal is indeed so frivolous that it may be decided without an adversary 

presentation.”2

(4) The Court has reviewed the record carefully and concluded that the 

appeal is wholly without merit and devoid of any arguably appealable issue. We 

also are satisfied that counsel made a conscientious effort to examine the record and 

1 Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82-83 (1988); McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 486 U.S. 

429, 442 (1988); Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). 

2 Penson, 488 U.S. at 82. 
3

the law and properly determined that Avila could not raise a meritorious claim on 

appeal. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior 

Court is AFFIRMED. The motion to withdraw is moot. 

BY THE COURT: 

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. 

 Chief Justice
ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD TO HOLD PREHEARING 

CONFERENCE ON CALLAWAY NUCLEAR PLANT LICENSE RENEWAL

An Atomic Safety and Licensing Board will hold a “prehearing conference” June 7 in 

Fulton, Mo., to discuss standing of petitioners and admissibility of their contentions challenging 

the license renewal application for the Callaway nuclear power plant, Unit 1.

The conference will be held in the Aldridge Lounge of the Aldridge Recreation Center, 

1 University Ave. on the campus of William Woods University in Fulton, beginning at 9 a.m. on 

June 7. The session is expected to be completed in one day.

The Missouri Coalition for the Environment petitioned for a hearing, filing three 

contentions challenging the Callaway license renewal application, which was submitted by 

Union Electric Co., the plant’s operator, on Dec. 19.

The Atomic Safety and Licensing Board is a quasi-judicial panel of judges independent 

of the NRC staff that conducts adjudicatory hearings in major licensing actions by the NRC.

At the prehearing conference, only attorneys representing the petitioner, the utility, and 

the NRC staff will participate. Members of the public are welcome to attend. 

The Board will also accept written statements from members of the public who wish to 

express their concerns about issues raised in the contentions. These statements may be submitted 

to Office of the Secretary, Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission, Washington, D.C., 20555-0001; faxed to 301-415-1101; or e-mailed to 

hearing.docket@nrc.gov. Copies should also be sent to the Board chair, Administrative Judge G. 

Paul Bollwerk III, ASLBP, Mail Stop T-3F23, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 

Washington, D.C., 20555-0001; faxed to 301-415-5599; or e-mailed to paul.bollwerk@nrc.gov. 

###

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand.

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 12-058 May 17, 2012
No: 14-070 October 20, 2014

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

NRC Renews Operating Licenses of Limerick Nuclear Plant for an Additional 20 Years

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has renewed the operating licenses of the Limerick 

Generating Station, Units 1 and 2, for an additional 20 years of operation. The new licenses will expire

Oct. 26, 2044, for Unit 1 and June 22, 2049, for Unit 2.

The Limerick plant has two boiling water reactors and is located in Limerick Township, Pa., 

about 21 miles northwest of Philadelphia. Exelon Generation Co. LLC submitted the license renewal 

application on June 22, 2011. The NRC staff’s review of the application proceeded on two tracks. A 

safety evaluation report was issued Jan. 10, 2013, and supplemented on Aug. 12, 2014. A supplemental 

environmental impact statement was published Aug. 27, 2014. These documents, as well as other 

information on the Limerick license renewal, are available on the NRC website. 

Renewal of the Limerick licenses brings to 75 the number of commercial nuclear power reactors 

with renewed licenses. Applications for an additional 17 renewals are currently under review. 

Information about those reviews can be found on the NRC website.