alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
June 27, 20ll 

.. -- -.. . , 

Notice of .. ~ _ ..;:; ':~~? :~~ ' 

SkyWest Airlines, Inc. 

Intent to tenninate Delta Connection 

Service at Cody, Wyoming 

Pursuant to Title 49 of the 

U.S. Code, Section 41734 

__ I 

Pursuant to Title 49 of the U.S. Code, Section 41734, SkyWest Airlines, Inc. hereby 

serves its notice of intent to discontinue the Delta Connection service from Salt Lake 

City, Utah to Cody, Wyoming effective September 25,2011. 

Sincerely, 

Michael Thompson 

Vice President - Market Development 

SkyWest Airlines 

444 South River Road 

St. George, UT 84790 
Dennis DeVany 

Chief, EAS & Domestic Analysis 

United States Department of Transportation 

400 Seventh Street, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

(by E-Mail) 

Bob Hooper 

Yellowstone Regional Airport 

Airport Manager 

P.O. Box 2748 

3001 Duggleby Drive 

Cody, Wyoming, U.S.A. 82414 

(by E-Mail) 

Mayor Nancy Tia Brown 

Mayor City of Cody 

1338 Rumsey Avenue 

PO Box 2200 

Cody, WY 82414
#### § 930.52 Applicant.

The term “applicant” means any individual, public or private corporation, partnership, association, or other entity organized or existing under the laws of any nation, State, or any State, regional, or local government, who, following management program approval, either files an application for a required individual federal license or permit, or who files a consistency certification for a required general federal license or permit under § 930.31(d) to conduct an activity affecting any coastal use or resource. The term “applicant” does not include Federal agencies applying for federal licenses or permits. Federal agency activities requiring federal licenses or permits are subject to subpart C of this part.
,_o sr17

I

UNITED STATES ENViRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

L PflQ REGION IX

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 941 05-3901

SEP 3 0 2814

The Honorable Elizabeth Kipp. Chairperson

Big Sandy Rancheria of Mono Indians of California

P.O. Box 337

Auberry, California 93602

Dear Chairperson Kipp:

Pursuant to Executive Order 13175 and the EPA Policy on Consultation and Coordination with Indian

Tribes, I would like to invite the Big Sandy Rancheria of Mono Indians of California to engage in

government-to-government consultation on action EPA is considering to reclassify the San Joaquin Valley

nonattainment area from Moderate nonattainment to Serious nonattainment for two National Ambient Air

Quality Standards (NAAQS) for fine particulate matter (PM2.5).

The San Joaquin Valley is currently classified Moderate nonattainment for two PM2.5NAAQS established in

1997 and 2006. EPA is evaluating air quality and modeling analyses regarding the ability ofthe San Joaquin

Valley to attain the 1997 and the 2006 PM2.5NAAQS by the applicable attainment dates for each standard.

Consistent with these evaluations, EPA is also considering action to reclassify the San Joaquin Valley as

Serious nonattainment for the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5NAAQS. These reclassification actions would establish

new attainment dates and outline new air quality planning requirements.

These reclassifications would also lower the applicable “major source” thresholds for the purposes of the

nonattainment new source review program and the Title V operating permit program from its current level of

1 00 tons per year (tpy) to 70 tpy, potentially subjecting more stationary sources to these requirements. The

reclassifications may also lower the dc minimis threshold for the Clean Air Act’s General Conformity

requirement from 100 tpy to 70 tpy. Under the General Conformity requirement, Federal agencies bear the

responsibility of determining conformity of actions in nonattainment and maintenance areas that require

Federal permits, approvals, or funding.

To ensure that the interests and concerns ofthe Big Sandy Rancheria of Mono Indians of California are

considered, I would like to invite you or your designated consultation representative to engage in

government-to-government consultation with EPA. To request further information, or to initiate consultation.

please have your staff contact Mr. Kerry Drake, Associate Director, Air Division, at (41 5) 947-41 57 or by

electronic mail at drake.kerryepa.gov. If you desire government-to-government consultation with EPA. we

respectfully request that you notify us by October 27, 2014. Thank you and I look forward to receiving your

input.

Sincerely,

eborah Jordan

Director, Air Division

cc: Jaime Collins, Environmental Programs Manager

P1i1ltt’(1 oh J?ek’1 J‘per
No: 13-048 June 6, 2013 

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

NRC Issues Enhanced Requirements For

Post‐Fukushima Venting Systems at Many U.S. Reactors  

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has directed 31 U.S. reactors to further improve their 

systems for safely venting pressure from their containment buildings during potential accidents. 

The agency’s Order today supersedes a March 2012 Order for the 31 reactors with “Mark I” and 

“Mark II” containments to install or improve their “hardened” venting systems. The enhanced Order 

requires the vents to handle the pressures, temperatures, hydrogen concentrations and radiation levels 

from a damaged reactor. The enhancements also ensure plant personnel can operate the vents safely if 

the reactor core is damaged. 

“Strengthened vents will help these plants continue to protect the public and the environment 

even if emergency systems can’t immediately stop an accident,” NRC Chairman Allison M. Macfarlane 

said. “By safely releasing built-up pressure and hydrogen, the plants will preserve the buildings that 

contain radioactive material.” 

The Order covers venting scenarios for both “wetwells,” structures meant to condense accidentgenerated steam and control pressure, and the larger “drywell” structures that surround the reactor. The 

Order requires the 31 plants to complete wetwell venting improvements starting in June 2014 

(depending on a plant’s refueling schedule). The plants must also analyze their drywell venting 

scenarios and if necessary, install a drywell venting option starting in June 2017. The Order will be 

available in the NRC’s electronic document database, ADAMS, under accession number 

ML13143A321. 

The NRC staff is also following Commission direction to develop a rule for the 31 plants to 

implement strategies to enhance filtering of radioactive material from any vented gases, as well as 

improve procedures for preserving containment integrity. The staff expects to hold public meetings 

later this month to discuss both the technical basis for the rule and the preparation of guidance for 

complying with the Order.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3637 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3637

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 6, 2012

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 401 Old Dixie Highway in Jupiter, Florida, as the ``Roy Schallern 
                      Rood Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROY SCHALLERN ROOD POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 401 Old Dixie Highway in Jupiter, Florida, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Roy Schallern Rood Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Roy 
Schallern Rood Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 5, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
### Part A—Prohibitions
Editorial Note on Part 922
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

§ 922.191 Definitions. ( a ) The following terms are defined for purposes of Subpart R: *Minor project* means any project listed in appendix B to this Subpart.
*Programmatic Agreement* means the agreement among NOAA, the Federal Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, and the State of Michigan, developed pursuant to the National Marine Sanctuaries Act (NMSA), 16 U.S.C. 1431 *et seq.* and section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 as amended, 16 U.S.C. 470 *et seq.,* which, in part, sets forth the procedures for review and approval of State Permits that authorize activities prohibited by the Sanctuary regulations.
*State Archaeologist* means the State Archaeologist, Michigan Historical Center, Michigan Department of State.
*State Permit* means any lease, permit, license, approval, or other authorization issued by the State of Michigan for the conduct of activities or projects within the Thunder Bay National Marine Sanctuary and Underwater Preserve that are prohibited by the regulations at § 922.193.
*Traditional fishing* means those commercial, recreational, and subsistence fishing activities that were customarily conducted within the Sanctuary prior to its designation or expansion, as identified in the relevant Final Environmental Impact Statement and Management Plan for this Sanctuary. Traditional fishing includes tribal fishing rights as provided for in the 1836 Treaty of Washington and subsequent court decisions related to the Treaty.
*Treaty fishing rights* means those rights reserved in the 1836 Treaty of Washington and in subsequent court decisions related to the Treaty.
*Underwater cultural resource* means: ( 1 ) Any sunken watercraft, including a ship, boat, canoe, skiff, raft, or barge; the rigging, gear, fittings, trappings, and equipment of any sunken watercraft; the personal property of the officers, crew, and passengers of any sunken watercraft; and the cargo of any sunken watercraft, that sank prior to the effective date of Sanctuary designation; and
( 2 ) Any of the above that sinks on or after the date of Sanctuary designation determined to be an underwater cultural resource by the Director pursuant to § 922.198. Underwater cultural resource also means any historical remnant of docks or piers or associated material, or materials resulting from activities of historic and prehistoric Native Americans.
( b ) Other terms appearing in the regulations are defined at 15 CFR part 922 subpart A, and/or in the National Marine Sanctuaries Act, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 1431 *et seq.*
[65 FR 39056, June 22, 2000, as amended at 79 FR 52972, Sept. 5, 2014; 79 FR 12080, Sept. 5, 2014]
### subpart iii—general provisions

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 106–501, title III, §312(b), Nov. 13, 2000, 114 Stat. 2252, redesignated subpart IV of this part as subpart III.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior subpart III, consisting of sections 3030g–11 to 3030g–13 of this title, related to school-based meals for volunteer older individuals and multigenerational programs, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 106–501, title III, §312(a), Nov. 13, 2000, 114 Stat. 2252.

Section 3030g–11, Pub. L. 89–73, title III, §338, as added Pub. L. 102–375, title III, §316(a), Sept. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 1239; amended Pub. L. 103–171, §3(a)(13), Dec. 2, 1993, 107 Stat. 1990, provided for establishment and implementation of the programs.

Section 3030g–12, Pub. L. 89–73, title III, §338A, as added Pub. L. 102–375, title III, §316(a), Sept. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 1240; amended Pub. L. 103–171, §3(a)(13), Dec. 2, 1993, 107 Stat. 1990; Pub. L. 103–382, title III, §391(r)(1), Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 4024, described required contents of application and criteria for selection among applicants.

Section 3030g–13, Pub. L. 89–73, title III, §338B, as added Pub. L. 102–375, title III, §316(a), Sept. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 1240; amended Pub. L. 103–171, §3(a)(11), (13), Dec. 2, 1993, 107 Stat. 1990, required States receiving grants to submit reports evaluating projects.
Exhibit 24.2

                    TAUBER AND BALSER, P.C.
                 Certified Public Accountants
                   3340 Peachtree Road, N.E.
                         Suite 250
                     Atlanta, GA 30326


                INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

As independent auditors of Dicut, Inc. ("Dicut"), we hereby consent to the
incorporation in the Transition Report on Form 10-KSB to be filed on or
about April 17, 2003 of our report dated April 9, 2003, relating to the
consolidated balance sheet of Dicut as of December 31, 2002, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders'
equity and cash flows for the nine months ended December 31, 2002.

/s/ Tauber and Balser, P.C.
------------------------------
Tauber and Balser, P.C.
Atlanta, Georgia
April 17, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b) OR 15d-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of DTS, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Melvin L. Flanigan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Date: November 9, 2009By:

/s/ MELVIN L. FLANIGAN Melvin L. Flanigan Chief Financial Officer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to DTS, Inc. and will be retained by
DTS, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Order filed December 4, 2015

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00926-CV

NO. 14-15-00927-CV

____________

In the Matter of T.H.

On Appeal from the 315th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 2015-02522J & 2015-02523J

ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal from an order waiving jurisdiction over a 

juvenile defendant. Appellant's brief was due December 3, 2015. No brief has 

been filed. 

Appeals in juvenile certification cases are to be brought to final disposition 

within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. This accelerated schedule 

requires greater compliance with briefing deadlines. 

Therefore we order appellant’s appointed counsel William M. Thursland, to 

file appellant’s brief no later than December 15, 2015. If the brief is not filed by 

that date, counsel may be required to show cause why he should not be held in 
contempt of court. In addition, the court may require appointment of new counsel 

due to the failure to timely file appellant’s brief. 

PER CURIAM
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT M ANUEL M U R O C ER

VANTES, Pe titione r, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 11-72749 Age n c y No. A035-878-554 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

Nove m b e r 18, 2014 ** B e fore : LEAVY, FISHER , a nd N.R . SM ITH, C irc uit Judge s. M anue l M uro C e rvante s, a native and c itiz e n of M e x ic o, pe titions for re vie w of the B o ard of Im

m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r dism i ssing his a ppe a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s (“ IJ” ) de c ision de ny ing his a pplic ation for c anc e lla

tion of re m ova l. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie wde novo 

# FIL ED NOV 28 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).que stions of la w. C ordoba v . Holde r

, 726 F.3d 1106, 1113 (9th C ir. 2013). W e de ny the pe tition for re vie w . C ontra ry to M uro C e rvante s’ c onte ntion, theB IA suffic ie ntly a ddre sse d his c la im tha t his IJ proc e e dings we re funda m e nta lly unfa ir, whe re the B IA sta te d tha t it re vie we d the argum e nts a dva nc e d on a ppe a l and c onc l ude d tha

t the IJ did not e rr in de te rm ining tha

t M uro C e rvante s fa ile d

to de m onstra

te tha t he wa rrants re lie f a s a m atte r of disc re tion. Se e N ajmabadi v . Holde r , 597 F.3d 983, 990 (9th C ir. 2010) (“ What is re quire d

is m e re ly tha t [the B IA] c onside r the issue s ra ise d, a n d announc e its de c ision in term s suffic ie nt to e n a ble a re vie w ing c ourt to pe rc e ive that it ha s he ard and thought a nd not m e re ly

re a c t e d.” (c ita

tion a nd quota tion m arks om i tte d)). In a ddition, M

uro C e rva n te s ha s not e sta

b l ishe d tha

t his proc e e d ings be fore the IJ we re funda

m e nta lly unfa ir or ta inte d by bia s. Se e 8 C . F.R . § 1003.10(b) (“ [i] n de c iding theindividual c a se s be fore the m , . . . im m igration judge s sha ll e xe rc ise the ir inde pe nde nt judgm e nt a nd disc re tion” ); Riv e ra v . Muk ase y , 508 F.3d 1271, 1276 (9th C ir. 2007). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

1 1 - 7 2 7 4 9 2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ARC Corporate Realty Trust, Inc. (ACRT) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert J. Ambrosi, Chief Executive Officer of ACRT, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of ACRT.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Ambrosi  
|Robert J. Ambrosi      
|Chief Executive Officer
|November 14, 2007
RB

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0588

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

RYAN PATRICK SULLIVAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 15-day extension of time, and

good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including August 19, 2022, within which to prepare, serve, and file its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 29 2022

07/29/2022
Robert N. Freeman



# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 27, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00006

- CV

Robert TYSON , Carl and Kathy Taylor, Linda and Ron Tetrick, Jim and Nancy Wescott, and
Paul and Ruthe Wilson, Appellant s

v.

Robert N. FREEMAN II, Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV

- 13

- 0200356 Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellees Boren and Yeates have filed a motion for extension of time to file their brief, requesting an extension to April 27, 2015. However, pursuant to our order of March 10, 2015, appellees’ brief is not due until May 12, 2015. Therefore we deny appellees’ motion for

extension of time as moot.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 27th day of March, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
No: 14-003 January 23, 2014

CONTACT: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200 

NRC Revises Review Schedule for Waste Confidence 

Environmental Study and Final Rule

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is revising its review schedule for the final versions of its 

Waste Confidence Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) and final rule on the extended 

storage of spent nuclear fuel at the nation’s commercial nuclear power plants.

When the Commission directed the staff to develop the environmental study and regulation, it 

gave a deadline of September 2014. The new schedule envisions publication of the rule and GEIS no 

later than Oct. 3. The delay reflects time lost during the government shutdown and lapse of 

appropriations last October. The shutdown led the agency to reschedule several public meetings and 

extend the public comment period on the draft versions of the GEIS and rule by nearly a month.

“Waste confidence remains a high agency priority,” NRC Chairman Allison Macfarlane said. 

“Our staff will continue to work aggressively to meet its schedule milestones and come as close as 

possible to meeting the original deadline. However, it’s important for the public and our licensees to 

know now that, due to unanticipated events, the staff may need some extra time to give the array of

public comments the attention they deserve.”

During the 98-day public comment period, the NRC held 13 public meetings nationwide to 

collect public comments on the draft environmental statement and rule. The agency also received more 

than 33,000 written comments.
1111 Nineteenth Street, NW, Suite 800 

### ▪ Washington, DC 20036 

### ▪ 202 463-2700 Fax: 202 463-2785 

### ▪ www.afandpa.org

America’s Forest & Paper People ®

- Improving Tomorrow’s Environment Today ® October 1, 2010

Mr. Jim Willis Director, Chemical Control Division

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.,

Mail Code: 7405M Washington DC 20460-0001

Subject: Request for Extension to Proposed TSCA Inventory Update Reporting (75 FR 49656, August 13, 2010; EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0187)

Dear Mr. Willis:

The American Forest & Paper Association (AF&PA) requests a 30-day extension for development of comments related to the propos ed modifications to the Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). A 30-day extension will afford AF&PA and other industries impacted by the regul ation a better opportunity to provide more meaningful feedback to the agency.

AF&PA is the national trade association of the forest products industry, representing pulp, paper, packaging and wood products manufacturers, and forest landowners. AF&PA members will be directly and materially impacted by any change in EPA’s IUR requirements.

We believe the nature of industry’s concerns with the proposed rule as well as the related reference documents are complex and require thorough review and consideration before providing comments to the agency. While we have been diligently working to understand the proposed rule’s impact and to identify alternat ive approaches, a 30 day extension would allow the industry additional time to review the proposal and provide more meaningful feedback to the

agency.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (202) 463-2700 or at paul_noe@afandpa.org

.

Sincerely,

Paul Noe Vice President, Public Policy

### Page 2