alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CHIEF JUSTICE

ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

GINA M. BENAVIDES

GREGORY T. PERKES

NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

DORIAN E. RAMIREZ NUECES COUNTY COURTH OUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FL OOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361

- 888

- 0416 (TEL)

361

- 888

- 0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLO OR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 7853 9

956

- 318

- 2405 (TEL)

956

- 318

- 2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa 

# Court of Appeals

Thirteenth District of Texas

May 26, 2015

Hon. Thomas J. Burbank

Attorney at Law

2 Acadiana Court

Beaumont, TX 77706

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL * Hon. Wayln G. Thompson

Asst. District Attorney

Jefferson County

1001 Pearl Street, 3rd Floor

Beaumont, TX 77701

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13

- 14

- 00192

- CR

Tr.Ct.No. 11

- 12939

Style: John Michael Weatherly aka Loco v. The State of Texas

The above

- referenced cause has been set for submission without oral argument

on Tuesday, June 16, 2015, before a panel consisting of Chief Jus tice Rogelio Valdez,

Justice Gina M. Benavides and Justice Gregory T. Perkes.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER: ch
IIB 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3412 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 29, 2012 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1421 Veterans Memorial Drive in Abbeville, 

Louisiana, as the ‘‘Sergeant Richard Franklin Abshire 

Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3412 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SERGEANT RICHARD FRANKLIN ABSHIRE POST 

2 OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 1421 Veterans Memorial Drive 

5 in Abbeville, Louisiana, shall be known and designated as 

6 the ‘‘Sergeant Richard Franklin Abshire Post Office 

7 Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant Richard 

12 Franklin Abshire Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 28, 2012. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
407 P.2d 54

#### Gilbert GRIFFIN, Petitioner, v. George L. ZIMMERMAN, District Judge, Division 2, Third Judicial District, Lincoln County, New Mexico, Respondent, and State of New Mexico, through Ernest Williams, District Attorney in and for the Third Judicial District, Party in Interest.

No. 8006.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Oct. 26, 1965.

. Ordered that George L. Zimmerman, District Judge, Division Two, Third Judir cial District, District Court, Lincoln County, New Mexico is commanded to desist and refrain from further proceedings in Criminal Cause No. 6971 in the District Court, Lincoln County, New Mexico, entitled State of New Mexico, Plaintiff, vs. Gilbert Griffin, Defendant.

Further ordered, that a writ of prohibition be issued accordingly and made permanent.
----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: May 9, 2011  | By:    | /s/ Tae Heum Jeong      |   |
|--------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|                     |   | Tae Heum Jeong,    |   |
|                     |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |

| * | This Certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This Certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing. |
|---|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
February 3, 2015 

MEMORANDUM TO: Mark A. Satorius 

 Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Andrew L. Bates, Acting Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS – COMSECY-14-0041 – 

YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT ACTIVITIES 

The Commission has approved the staff’s recommendation to: (1) develop and issue the 

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) supplement; and (2) proceed with proposed safety 

evaluation report (SER) wrap-up activities. 

The Commission has also approved Option 2 for making the Licensing Support Network (LSN) 

documents available to the public through ADAMS with enhanced search capability. However, 

this activity should be initiated no earlier than the close of the public comment period on the 

draft EIS supplement. This timing will allow the staff to gauge its resource estimates for 

completing and issuing the EIS supplement. 

The Commission also approves the lessons learned activities for the SER, but as a lower 

priority than the other items. 

Consistent with 10 CFR 2.1011, responsibility for the LSN document activities should not reside 

with the staff. Rather, LSN document activities should be coordinated by SECY and the ASLBP 

as appropriate. 

The staff should continue to provide monthly status reports to the relevant Congressional 

Committees. The staff should reach out to Congress after it submits its first monthly report after 

the final SER is issued to determine whether Congress concurs with receiving quarterly reports 

and report back to the Commission. 

If any issues arise that may require Commission intervention, the staff should promptly alert the 

Commission and seek guidance. 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA
§ 930.4 Conditional concurrences ( a ) Federal agencies, applicants, persons and applicant agencies should cooperate with State agencies to develop conditions that, if agreed to during the State agency's consistency review period and included in a Federal agency's final decision under subpart C or in a Federal agency's approval under subparts D, E, F or I of this part, would allow the State agency to concur with the federal action. If instead a State agency issues a conditional concurrence: ( 1 ) The State agency shall include in its concurrence letter the conditions which must be satisfied, an explanation of why the conditions are necessary to ensure consistency with specific enforceable policies of the management program, and an identification of the specific enforceable policies. The State agency's concurrence letter shall also inform the parties that if the requirements of paragraphs (a)(1) through (3) of the section are not met, then all parties shall treat the State agency's conditional concurrence letter as an objection pursuant to the applicable subpart and notify, pursuant to § 930.63(e), applicants, persons and applicant agencies of the opportunity to appeal the State agency's objection to the Secretary of Commerce within 30 days after receipt of the State agency's conditional concurrence/objection or 30 days after receiving notice from the Federal agency that the application will not be approved as amended by the State agency's conditions; and
( 2 ) The Federal agency (for subpart C), applicant (for subparts D and I), person (for subpart E) or applicant agency (for subpart F) shall modify the applicable plan, project proposal, or application to the Federal agency pursuant to the State agency's conditions. The Federal agency, applicant, person or applicant agency shall immediately notify the State agency if the State agency's conditions are not acceptable; and
( 3 ) The Federal agency (for subparts D, E, F and I) shall approve the amended application (with the State agency's conditions). The Federal agency shall immediately notify the State agency and applicant or applicant agency if the Federal agency will not approve the application as amended by the State agency's conditions.
( b ) If the requirements of paragraphs (a)(1) through (3) of this section are not met, then all parties shall treat the State agency's conditional concurrence as an objection pursuant to the applicable subpart.
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 357 

AN ACT 

For the relief of Corina de Chalup Turcinovic. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 357 EH

1 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR CORINA 

2 DE CHALUP TURCINOVIC. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

4 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

5 Act, Corina de Chalup Turcinovic shall be eligible for 

6 issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 

7 to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent resi8 dence upon filing an application for issuance of an immi9 grant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment 

10 of status to lawful permanent resident. 

11 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Corina de Chalup 

12 Turcinovic enters the United States before the filing dead13 line specified in subsection (c), she shall be considered to 

14 have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise 

15 eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 

16 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date 

17 of the enactment of this Act. 

18 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

19 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap20 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica21 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

22 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

23 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

24 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res25 idence to Corina de Chalup Turcinovic, the Secretary of 

26 State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, dur-
3 

•HR 357 EH

1 ing the current or next following fiscal year, the total num2 ber of immigrant visas that are made available to natives 

3 of the country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) 

4 of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, 

5 the total number of immigrant visas that are made avail6 able to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under 

7 section 202(e) of such Act. 

8 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

9 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 

10 parents, brothers, and sisters of Corina de Chalup 

11 Turcinovic shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be ac12 corded any right, privilege, or status under the Immigra13 tion and Nationality Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 4, 

2012. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 357 

AN ACT 

For the relief of Corina de Chalup Turcinovic.
### §10106. Protection of classified national security information

Nothing in this chapter shall require the release or disclosure to any person or to the Commission of any classified national security information.

(Pub. L. 97–425, §7, Jan. 7, 1983, 96 Stat. 2205.)
NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETINGS APRIL 3 TO DISCUSS SAFETY AND 

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS OF SEQUOYAH LICENSE RENEWAL

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold two public meetings Wednesday, April 3, 

in Soddy Daisy, Tenn., to discuss the agency’s review of the Tennessee Valley Authority’s 

application to renew the operating license of the Sequoyah nuclear power plant.

During the meetings, NRC staff members will explain the license renewal process and 

solicit public comments on the scope of the environmental review. The meetings will be held 

from 2-4 p.m. and 6-8 p.m. at the Soddy Daisy City Hall, 9835 Dayton Pike.

The Sequoyah plant has two pressurized-water reactors and is located in Soddy Daisy, 

Tenn., about 16 miles northeast of Chattanooga. The current operating licenses expire Sept. 17, 

2020, for Unit 1 and Sept. 15, 2021, for Unit 2. TVA submitted an application in January to 

renew the licenses for an additional 20 years. The NRC docketed the application in early March 

and published a notice of opportunity to request an adjudicatory hearing on March 5. The 

deadline to request a hearing is May 6.

Public comments on the scope of the environmental review may also be submitted in 

writing, following submittal instructions published March 8 in the Federal Register. The 

deadline to submit scoping comments is May 3.

The Sequoyah license renewal application and information about the license renewal 

process are available on the NRC website.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 13-021 March 28, 2013
#### § 1502.28 Conduct at oral hearings or conferences.

All participants in a hearing will conduct themselves with dignity and observe judicial standards of practice and ethics. They may not indulge in personal attacks, unseemly wrangling, or intemperate accusations or characterizations. Representatives of parties shall, to the extent possible, restrain clients from improprieties in connection with any proceeding. Disrespectful, disorderly, or contumacious language or conduct, refusal to comply with directions, use of dilatory tactics, or refusal to adhere to reasonable standards of orderly and ethical conduct during any hearing shall constitute grounds for immediate exclusion from the proceeding by the presiding officer.
E. Kuhn Resignation Letter




July 30, 2007

Eric J. Kuhn

Chairman of the Board of Directors

Varsity Group Inc.

Re: Amendment to Employment Agreement


Dear Eric:



This letter agreement (this "Agreement") shall serve as amendment #2 to your employment agreement dated August 24, 1999 with Varsitybooks.com Inc. (your "Employment Agreement").  



Effective as of August 1, 2007, you have agreed to reduce your salary to $15,000 per annum.



The foregoing amendment shall not constitute "Good Reason" as defined in Section 6(d)(ii) your Employment Agreement, and this Agreement shall not serve as a "Notice of Termination" under Section 6(c) of your Employment Agreement.



You agree that your Employment Agreement and this Agreement together constitute the entire agreement between you and the Company with respect to your employment with the Company, and agree that the terms of your Employment Agreement shall be incorporated herein as if restated in full.  Please confirm your agreement by signing and counterpart to this letter.



Very truly yours

Varsity Group Inc.



By:/s/ Jim Craig



Jim Craig 



Title: CEO

Confirmed and Agreed:



/s/ Eric J. Kuhn



Eric J. Kuhn
### §12205a. Rule of construction regarding regulatory authority

The authority to issue regulations granted to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Transportation under this chapter includes the authority to issue regulations implementing the definitions of disability in section 12102 of this title (including rules of construction) and the definitions in section 12103 of this title, consistent with the ADA Amendments Act of 2008.

(Pub. L. 101–336, title V, §506, as added Pub. L. 110–325, §6(a)(2), Sept. 25, 2008, 122 Stat. 3558.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 101–336, July 26, 1990, 104 Stat. 327, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 12101 of this title and Tables.

The ADA Amendments Act of 2008, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 110–325, Sept. 25, 2008, 122 Stat. 3553, which enacted this section and section 12103 of this title, amended sections 12101, 12102, 12111 to 12114, 12201, and 12206 to 12213 of this title and section 705 and former section 706 of Title 29, Labor, and enacted provisions set out as notes under section 12101 of this title and section 705 of Title 29. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 2008 Amendment note under section 12101 of this title and Tables.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 506 of Pub. L. 101–336 was renumbered section 507 and is classified to section 12206 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 2009, see section 8 of Pub. L. 110–325, set out as an Effective Date of 2008 Amendment note under section 705 of Title 29, Labor.
No: III-14-002 January 10, 2014

CONTACT: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663

NRC Proposes $3,500 Civil Penalty to University of Michigan

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has proposed a $3,500 civil penalty against the Regents of the 

University of Michigan Radiation Safety Service, for security-related violations stemming from a routine 

NRC materials inspection. 

The NRC conducted the inspection between June and September of 2013. NRC staff looked at the 

usage of licensed materials for medical applications, research and development at the Ann Arbor, Flint and 

Pellston campuses. The security violations were identified at the Ann Arbor campus. Once the violations of 

NRC requirements were identified the university took immediate corrective actions to restore compliance.

Details about security-related violations are not made public.

A copy of the Enforcement Action will be posted on the Agencywide Documents Access and 

Management System (ADAMS) at the NRC website.
#### § 848.504 Non-eligibility for annuity supplement.

A phased retiree is not eligible to receive an annuity supplement under 5 U.S.C. 8421.
#### Henry Glickman, Respondent, v. The New York, Ontario and Western Railway Company, Appellant.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted. No opinion. Present—Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Smith, JJ.
OFFICE OF THE AT&RNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AwaTlN 

Bonoroble Geo. H. Sheppard 

Comptroller of Publio.Aeoounts 

Aimtin, Texas 

Dear Sir; 

Ootober 17, 1939, 

C. E. Evans, President 

whioh you request an 

ot it is leg01 to pay 

Teachers College out of 

proprlation Bill also contains oertain 

"Salary Provisions. No salary appropriated herein 

shall be supplomcnted out of student fee funds, domitory 

funds, or local funds, exco t out of the Pure Fe94 Fund 

at the Agriculturnl and Ret iit anical College or out of 

funds received from the United States Government or Its 

agencies, unless 30 ordered by the governing board of the 
. 

. Hon. Geo. Bl Sheppard, page 2 

Institution to which such salary or salaries apply, at a 

regular meeting with et least a majority of the members 

of such board present, and such order shell be enb;eZed 

in the minutes of the proueedings of said board and shall 

set forth fully the reoaons therefor. No full time 

in3truCtiOn3l SRlRry es itemized herein shall be adjusted 

to exceed en amount above the maximum full professor's 

salary as herein itemized to be appropriated from the Genera1 Revenue Fund of the State for the partiouler institution to which said salary or salaries apply, unless the 

maximum salary is being reoeived, in which case such adjustment may be made not to exceed ten per cent above 

such maximum salary 30 received. . ." 

The seotion above quote& is the only possible limitation 

that might be applied to the instruotor~e right to receive compensation for his services in aoting as a judge or umpire in ethletio 

oontests. 

It is to be noted, however, that the limitation set out in 

Seotion 2 does not apply in case of'supplemontory fee bolng paid out 

by the athletic or extramural dopnrtment because of Subseotion 11 of 

the gonornl provisions which read as follows: 

"Suboeotlon (11). Athletic or Extramural Depertmont. The General provisions made In this Act shall hot 

apply to athletic or extramural departments, nor to positions not contained in the Itemized appropriation Act for 

the fiscal year ending August 31, 1933; and as to these 

exceptions, the governing board shall make such neoeesary 

rules end adjustments as may be deemed odvlsable." 

In the letter from Dr. Evans it is lndiaated that the Student 

Activity Funds are deposited with the College end disbursed under 

the general direction of the College by the governing board of seidCollege. Subsection 11, above quoted, provides that auoh bisbursement may be made by aaid governing board. 

It is the opinion of this Department,Y therefore, that the 

Instructor of Science et Southwest Texns State Teachers College may 

0130 receive, out 0r the Student Activity Fund, fees ror aoting ae 

judge, umpire, or Ureotor in athletio oontests. 

Yours very truly 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

BG:N 

Approved Oct. 23, 1939 

GERALD C. MNN 

ATTORNEYGENERAL OFTEXAS 

By: Billy Boldberg 

Assistant 

Approved: Opinion Committee 

By EWB, Chairman