alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Little Sioux Corn Processors, L.L.C.(the “Company”) for the three month fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Stephen Roe, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |  /s/ Stephen Roe                 |         |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------------|
|   | Stephen Roe                           |         |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | Dated:                                | May 13, 2005 |   |
|        |                                       |              |  |  |

 

----
### §12713. Eligibility under first-time homebuyer programs

#### (a) Eligibility of displaced homemakers and single parents for Federal assistance for first-time homebuyers

#### (1) Displaced homemakers

No individual who is a displaced homemaker may be denied eligibility under any Federal program to assist first-time homebuyers on the basis that the individual, while a homemaker, owned a home with his or her spouse or resided in a home owned by the spouse.

#### (2) Single parents

No individual who is a single parent may be denied eligibility under any Federal program to assist first-time homebuyers on the basis that the individual, while married, owned a home with his or her spouse or resided in a home owned by the spouse.

#### (b) Definitions

For purposes of this section:

#### (1) Displaced homemaker

The term "displaced homemaker" means an individual who—

(A) is an adult;

(B) has not worked full-time, full-year in the labor force for a number of years but has, during such years, worked primarily without remuneration to care for the home and family; and

(C) is unemployed or underemployed and is experiencing difficulty in obtaining or upgrading employment.

#### (2) First-time homebuyer

The term "first-time homebuyer" means an individual who has never, or has not during a specified period of time, had any present ownership interest in a principal residence.

#### (3) Single parent

The term "single parent" means an individual who—

(A) is unmarried or legally separated from a spouse; and

(B)(i) has 1 or more minor children for whom the individual has custody or joint custody; or

(ii) is pregnant.

#### (c) Applicability

This section shall apply to any Federal program to assist first-time homebuyers, unless the program is exempted from this section by a statute that amends this subsection or explicitly refers to this subsection.

(Pub. L. 101–625, title IX, §956, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4421.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of title IX of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act, and not as part of title I of such Act which comprises this subchapter.
### Part B—Program Administration
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 2001

In re: TIMOTHY WALKER

,

Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus (5:19

- hc

- 02071

- F L )

Submitted : January 23, 2020 Decided: February 2 1

, 2020

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Timothy Walker, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Timothy Walker petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court

has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (201 8 ) petition

. He seeks an order

from this court directing the district court to act. T he present record doe s not reveal undue

delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma

pauperis we deny the mandamus petition. To the extent Walker specifically seeks an order

from this court directing the district court to order the Go vernment to respond to his

petition, we deny that request. * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENI ED

* The Government’s response to Walker’s petition was filed on January 24, 2020.
Exhibit 99.1
Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, James N. Ryan, the Chief Executive Officer of Petroleum Development Corporation, the managing general partner of 2002-D Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"),  hereby certify that: 
- I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Partnership (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;
- the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

___/s/ James N. Ryan                                  

Name: James N. Ryan

Title: Chief Executive Officer

Date: ___May 14, 2003_____
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANTTO**EXCHANGE ACTRULES 13a-14(b) OR 15d-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

Jon E. Kirchnerhereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.     He is thePresident and Chief Executive Officer of Digital Theater Systems, Inc.

2.     The Form 10-Qreport of Digital Theater Systems, Inc. for the quarterly period ended September 30,2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

3.     Theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q report of Digital Theater Systems, Inc.for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of DigitalTheater Systems, Inc. for the period covered bythe report.
| Dated: November 10,  2004 |   |                                    |
|--------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|                                | By:    | /s/ Jon E. Kirchner                     |
|                           |   | Jon E. Kirchner                         |
|                           |   | *President and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

Asigned original of this written statement has been provided to DigitalTheater Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Digital Theater Systems, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

----
No: 15-041 June 30, 2015

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200

NRC Publishes Annual Report to Congress on Nuclear Security Inspections

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has made available to the public an unclassified version of 

its annual report to Congress detailing the previous year’s security inspection program. The report is 

required under the Energy Policy Act of 2005.

The report covers the NRC’s security inspection program, including force-on-force exercises, 

for commercial nuclear power reactors and Category I fuel cycle facilities for calendar year 2014.

“The NRC files this report to inform Congress on our efforts to oversee the protection of the 

nation’s civilian nuclear power infrastructure,” NRC Chairman Stephen G. Burns said. “The NRC is 

committed to ensuring licensees maintain robust and rigorous physical and cybersecurity programs to 

protect the facilities we regulate and the materials managed within them.”

In 2014, the NRC updated its force-on-force inspection procedure and continued efforts to 

review and enhance security inspections at nuclear power plants entering the decommissioning process. 

Overall, the NRC conducted 233 security inspections, including 23 force-on-force inspections, during 

2014. The security program and publicly available results of the inspections are discussed in the report. 

Whenever a finding is identified during a security inspection, the NRC ensures the issue is 

corrected immediately or compensatory measures are put in place, if necessary. Details of security 

findings are considered sensitive and not released to the public.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2558

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 to allow the Secretary of the Army to extend the period during which the Secretary 

may provide beach nourishment for a water resources development 

project. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 23, 2003

Mr. MCINTYRE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 

to allow the Secretary of the Army to extend the period 

during which the Secretary may provide beach nourishment for a water resources development project.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. BEACH NOURISHMENT. 

4 Section 156 of the Water Resources Development Act 

5 of 1976 (1962d–5f) is amended 

6 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—’’ before 

7 ‘‘The Secretary’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following: 
2

•HR 2558 IH 

1 ‘‘(b) REQUESTS FOR EXTENSIONS.—At the request 

2 of a non-Federal interest, the Secretary, acting through 

3 the Chief of Engineers, may extend the period during 

4 which the Secretary provides beach nourishment for a 

5 project under subsection (a) for such additional period as 

6 the Secretary determines necessary, except that the addi7 tional period may not exceed 50 years. ’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2

EXHIBIT 32.2

 

 

Endeavour International Corporation

 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Endeavour International Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2013 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Catherine L. Stubbs, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

/s/Catherine L. Stubbs___

Catherine L. Stubbs

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

Date:March 21, 2014

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Endeavour International Corporation and will be retained by Endeavour International Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

			 		

----
### §12879. Implementation

Not later than the expiration of the 180-day period beginning on the date that funds authorized under this part first become available for obligation, the Secretary shall by notice establish such requirements as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this part. Such requirements shall be subject to section 553 of title 5. The Secretary shall issue regulations based on the initial notice before the expiration of the 8-month period beginning on the date of the notice.

(Pub. L. 101–625, title IV, §430, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4172.)
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS N O . A P - 76, 133
EX PA R TE C H R I STO PH ER W O FFO R D , A ppl i c ant
ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A W RI T OF HABE AS CORP US CAUS E N O. 4 5 , 7 4 2 - C I N T HE 8 9 DI S TR I CT COURT TH FROM W I CH I TA CO UNTY
P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Crim i n al P ro ce dure, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habe as cor

pus. Ex pa rte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967)
. Ap p l i cant was convicte d of assault on a public serva

ntand sente nced to five y ear s’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction. Applicant conte nds that his plea was involuntary beca use the ne g otiated plea ba

rg ain to have
a c ha nc e in b oo t c amp wa s une nf or c e a ble be c a us e Ap pli c ant w a s n ot e lig ibl e fo r t he bo ot c amp prog ram . All parties agree that the plea a g re ement wa s for Applica nt to go to boot camp and upon2

succe ssful completion, he would be rele ased on three y ear s of community supervision. All parties
a g re e that App lic ant w a s n ot e lig ibl e fo r b oo t camp an d that whe n he wa s bro ug ht b a c k to Wic hit a County , the intention was to rele ase him to community supervision. Howe ver , d ue to medica l pr ob l e m s an d

a d e a t hi nd e f

e n s e c o u n s e l ’ s f

am i l y , t h e c a s e w a s r e s e tu n t i l a f t e r t h e t r i a l c o u rtl o st jurisdi ct i on. All parties agree that Applicant is entitled to relief . Ba sed on the plea dings a nd aff id av i ts in the recor d, the trial cour t determined that the plea a g ree ment was not followed
. Applicant is entitled to relief
. Ex pa rteHu e rta , 692 S.W .2d 681 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985). Relief is g rante d. The judg ment in Cause No. 45,742-C in the 89 J udicial District Court of th WichitaCounty

is set aside, and A

pplicant is remande d to the custody of the sher iff of Wichita County to answer

the cha rg es as se t out in the in d i ct m en t . Applicant’s r emainingclaims are dismiss ed. Copies of this opi n io n

s h a llb e s e nt t o th e Texas Depar tment of Criminal J ustice–Corre ctional I nstitut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: April 22, 2009 Do No t Pu

bli sh
Exhibit 8.1

LIST OF SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES OF SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD.



|                                        |  |                               |  |                                             |     |  
|--------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------- | --- | -
|Company                                 |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation |  | Percentage OwnershipAs of December 31, 2011 |    
|                                        |  |                              
|SPIL (B.V.I.) Holding Limited           |  | British Virgin Islands        |  |                                             | 100 | %
|Siliconware U.S.A. Inc.                 |  | United States of America      |  |                                             | 100 | %
|SPIL (Cayman) Holding Limited           |  | Cayman Islands                |  |                                             | 100 | %
|Siliconware Technology (Suzhou) Limited |  | Peoples Republic of China    |  |                                             | 100 | %
#### Gold’n Crust Company, Inc., Respondent, v. Relco Specialties, Inc., Appellant.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur. (Appeal from an order of Monroe Special Term, denying defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Piper and Van Duser, JJ.
### §12877. Exemption

Eligible property covered by a homeownership program approved under this part shall not be subject to—

(1) the Low-Income Housing Preservation and Resident Homeownership Act of 1990 [12 U.S.C. 4101 et seq.], or

(2) the requirements of section 1701z–11 of title 12 applicable to the sale of projects either at foreclosure or after acquisition by the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 101–625, title IV, §427, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4171.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Low-Income Housing Preservation and Resident Homeownership Act of 1990, referred to in par. (1), is title II of Pub. L. 100–242, as amended by Pub. L. 101–625, title VI, §601(a), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4249, which is classified principally to chapter 42 (§4101 et seq.) of Title 12, Banks and Banking. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4101 of Title 12 and Tables.
No: IV-14-026 December 15, 2014

CONTACT: Victor Dricks, 817-200-1128

 Lara Uselding, 817-200-1519

NRC Names New Senior Resident Inspector at

Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has selected Charles Peabody as the new Senior Resident 

Inspector at the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station in Wintersburg, Ariz.

“Charles Peabody’s technical experience and regulatory perspective will 

assist the NRC in carrying out its mission to protect people and the 

environment by ensuring the safe operation of Palo Verde,” said NRC Region 

IV Administrator Marc Dapas.

Peabody joined the NRC’s Region II office in Atlanta, Ga., in 2003, as a 

Co-Op Student. He became a full-time NRC employee in May 2004, serving as 

an engineering inspector in the Division of Reactor Safety. He was assigned as 

the Resident Inspector at the Wolf Creek Generating Station in May 2009. In 

February 2013, Peabody was promoted to be the Senior Resident Inspector at 

Wolf Creek. He holds a bachelor’s degree in nuclear and radiological engineering from the Georgia 

Institute of Technology.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two Resident Inspectors. Peabody joins 

Resident Inspectors David You and Dustin Reinert. They serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the 

facility, conducting inspections, monitoring significant work projects, and interacting with plant 

workers and the public.

The Palo Verde Resident Inspectors can be reached at 623-386-3638.
----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: August 16, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Chang H. Ahn        |   |
|------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|                   |   | Chang H. Ahn,      |   |
|                   |   | Chief Executive Officer |   |

| * | This Certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This Certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing. |
|---|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
# Third Circuit Task Force on the Selection of Class Counsel

## Appendix B, Volume 1

### Class Counsel - Witness Statements

----

-  **Arlin M. Adams, EsquireSchnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP    - Appointment of Counsel in Class Action Lawsuits**[click here for PDF]    - **Response to "Questions to be Addressed by Third Circuit Task Force..."**[click here for PDF] 
- R. Franklin Balotti, Esquire  [ click    here for PDF ]   Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. 
- Leonard Barrack  [ click    here for PDF ]  *This is a large file and may take a few moments to process.   Barrack Rodos & Bacine      - Supplemental Statement [ click    here for PDF ]   
- Professor Lucian Ayre Bebchuk  [ click    here for PDF ]   Harvard Law School   
- David M. Becker, General Counsel  [ click    here for PDF ]   U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission    
- Andrew T. Berry, Esquire  [ click    here for PDF ]   McCarter & English, LLP   
- Elizabeth J. Cabraser, Esquire  [ click    here for PDF ]   Lief, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, LLP   
- Professor John C. Coffee, Jr.  [ click    here for PDF ]   Columbia University School of Law 
- Richard B. Drubel, Esquire  [ click    here for PDF ]   Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP 
- Professor Jill E. Fisch  [ click here for PDF ]   Fordham University School of Law 
- Michael D. Fishbein, Esquire  [ click    here for PDF ]   Levin, Fishbein, Sedran & Berman 
-   Lorna   Bade Goodman, Esquire   [ click    here for PDF ]   Senior Assistant Corporation Counsel  The New York City Corporation Counsel's Office 
- Stuart M. Grant, Esquire and Jay W. Eisenhofer, Esquire  [ click here for PDF ]   Grant & Eisenhofer, P.A. 
- Professor Joseph A. Grundfest  [ click    here for PDF ]   Stanford Law School 
- Professor Samuel Issacharoff  [ click    here for PDF ]   Columbia University School of Law 
- Keith Johnson, Esquire  [ click    here for PDF ]   Chief Legal Counsel, State of Wisconsin Investment Board 
- Arthur M. Kaplan, Esquire  [ click    here for PDF ]   Fine, Kaplan and Black, R.P.C.   

----
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**New Holland Credit Company, LLC**

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of New Holland Credit Company, LLC (“NHCC”), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2018 (as amended from time to time, the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) by and among NHCC, CNH Capital Receivables LLC and CNH Equipment Trust 2019-B, does hereby certify that:

 

1.             NHCC is Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

 

2.             The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Indenture Trustee.

 

3.             This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 4.9(a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

 

4.             A review of the Servicer’s activities during the period from the trust’s initial cut-off date, April 30, 2019, to and including December 31, 2019 and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

5.             To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the period from the trust’s initial cut-off date, April 30, 2019, to and including December 31, 2019.

 

6.             IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 23rd day of March, 2020.

 

March 23, 2020

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Carlo Alberto Sisto |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Carlo Alberto Sisto     |
|   | Title: | President               |

 

----