alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No: 14-026 April 8, 2014

CONTACT: Maureen Conley, 301-415-8200 

NRC Issues License to Powertech for Dewey Burdock 

Uranium Recovery Facility in South Dakota

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued an operating license to Powertech USA for the 

Dewey Burdock uranium recovery facility in Fall River and Custer Counties, South Dakota.

Powertech submitted the application for the in situ recovery facility in August 2009. The license 

is the fourth issued by the NRC for a uranium recovery facility since 1998.

The NRC’s review of the application included an environmental review published in January as 

a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), which referenced the agency’s Generic EIS for 

in situ recovery facilities.

The NRC’s review also included a Safety Evaluation Report, which concluded the proposed 

facility can operate safely, including management of radiological and chemical hazards, groundwater 

protection, and eventual cleanup and decommissioning. An NRC Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 

will hold a hearing to examine environmental and safety contentions related to the project later this 

year.

The Dewey Burdock EIS, NUREG-1910 Supplement 4, Volumes 1 and 2, are available on the 

NRC website. The Safety Evaluation Report, the license and more information on the Dewey Burdock 

application are also available.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2411 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2411

   To decrease the matching funds requirement and authorize further 
         appropriations for Keweenaw National Historical Park.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 10, 2003

  Mr. Stupak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To decrease the matching funds requirement and authorize further 
         appropriations for Keweenaw National Historical Park.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FUNDING FOR KEWEENAW NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK.

    (a) Matching Requirement.--Section 8(b) of Public Law 102-543 (16 
U.S.C. 410yy-7(b)) is amended by striking ``$4'' and inserting ``$1''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 10(a) of Public Law 
102-543 (16 U.S.C. 410yy-9(a)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$25,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$50,000,000''; and
            (2) by striking ``$3,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$25,000,000''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1014.8 Appeal of initial denial of access, correction or amendment. ( a ) Any individual whose request for access, correction or amendment to a record is denied, in whole or in part, may appeal that decision within 30 working days to the Chairman, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Washington, D.C. 20207.
( b ) The appeal shall be in writing and shall: ( 1 ) Name the individual making the appeal;
( 2 ) Identify the record to which access is sought or which is sought to be corrected or amended;
( 3 ) Name or describe the record system in which the record is contained;
( 4 ) Contain a short statement describing the correction of amendment sought;
( 5 ) State the name and location of the Commission official who initially denied the correction or amendment; and
( 6 ) State the date of the initial denial.
( c ) Not later than 30 working days after the date on which the appeal is received, the Chairman shall complete a review of the appeal and make a final decision thereon. However, for good cause shown, the Chairman of the Commission may extend the 30-day period. If the Chairman so extends the period, he or she shall promptly notify the individual requesting the review that the extension has been made.
( d ) If after review of an appeal request, the Chairman also refuses to amend the record or grant access to the record in accordance with the request, he or she shall send a written notice to the requester containing the following information: ( 1 ) The decision and the reasons for the decision;
( 2 ) The right of the requester to institute a civil action in a Federal District Court for judicial review of the decision; and
( 3 ) The right of the requester to file with the Chairman a concise statement setting forth the reasons for his or her disagreement with the denial of the correction or amendment. A copy of the statement of disagreement shall be filed with the record in issue, and the record in issue shall be so marked as to indicate that there is a disagreement. The system manager shall make the statement of disagreement available to prior recipients of the disputed record to the extent that an accounting of disclosures was maintained, and to any person to whom the record is later disclosed, together with a brief statement, if deemed appropriate, of the reasons for denying the requested correction or amendment.
[40 FR 53381, Nov. 18, 1975, as amended at 42 FR 22878, May 5, 1977]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-53,515B; TA-W-53,515E; TA-W-53,515I; and TA-W-53,515K]

Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on November 13, 2003, in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Thomasville Furniture Industries, Inc., CDK/CPS, Thomasville, North Carolina (TA-W-53,515B); Thomasville Furniture Industries, Inc., Plant M, Thomasville, North Carolina (TA-W-53,515E); Thomasville Furniture Industries, Inc., Warehouse, Thomasville, North Carolina (TA-W-53,515I); and Thomasville Furniture Industries, Inc., Lenoir Plant, Lenoir, North Carolina (TA-W-53,515K).

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC this 13th day of January, 2004.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 04-2616  Filed 2-5-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Annual
Report of Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the SEC on the date hereof, I, Eva Chen, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 26, 2011



By:

/s/ Eva ChenName:

Eva ChenTitle:

Chief Financial Officer




|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the company and will be retained by the
company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No: 13-079 September 16, 2013

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board to Hold Hearing Oct. 16

in Houston on Proposed New South Texas Project Reactors

An Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB) will hold a hearing Wednesday, Oct. 16 in 

Houston, concerning a challenge to the Combined License application for two new nuclear reactors at 

the South Texas Project site near Bay City, Texas. The ASLB is the independent body within the 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission that conducts adjudicatory hearings and renders decisions on legal 

challenges to licensing actions.

The hearing, which begins at 9 a.m. CDT, will be held in Courtroom 11B of the U.S. District 

and Bankruptcy Courthouse at 515 Rusk Ave. in Houston. If necessary, the board will continue the 

hearing through Thursday, Oct. 17. The board could close a portion of the hearing to the public if 

proprietary information must be discussed. Members of the public and media are welcome to observe 

the evidentiary hearing, but participation in the hearing will be limited to the parties and their lawyers 

and witnesses. Those planning to attend the evidentiary hearing should arrive at least 15 minutes early 

to allow time for security screening, including searches of hand-carried items such as briefcases or 

backpacks. No signs will be permitted in the courtroom. 

The board will also take written comments from interested members of the public, known as 

limited appearance statements. These statements are not testimony or evidence, but they nonetheless 

may aid the board and/or the parties in considering the issues in the hearing. Statements may be 

submitted until 5 p.m. EDT on October 9, via mail to:, Office of the Secretary Rulemaking and 

Adjudications Staff, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001; via fax to 

(301) 415-1101 or via e-mail to hearingdocket@nrc.gov. Copies of the statements should also be 

submitted to: Administrative Judge Michael M. Gibson, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel,

Mail Stop T-3F23, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001; via fax to 

(301) 415-5599, or via email to carter.thurman@nrc.gov and michael.gibson@nrc.gov. 

This hearing involves Nuclear Innovation North America’s application to build two Advanced 

Boiling-Water Reactors at the South Texas Project site. The hearing will examine whether the 

applicant’s planned corporate governing structure and financing comply with the NRC’s rules 

prohibiting foreign ownership, control and domination.

Documents related to the South Texas Project application are available on the NRC website. 

Documents regarding this board’s proceeding are available on the NRC’s Electronic Hearing Docket by 

clicking on the folder entitled “South_Texas_52-012&013-COL” on the left side of the page. More 

information about the role of the ASLB in the licensing process is available on the NRC website.
### §10007. Federal radiation guidelines

The Secretary shall, in conjunction with the Radiation Policy Council, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, appropriate agencies of the States, and appropriate professional organizations, promulgate Federal radiation guidelines with respect to radiologic procedures. Such guidelines shall—

(1) determine the level of radiation exposure due to radiologic procedures which is unnecessary and specify the techniques, procedures, and methods to minimize such unnecessary exposure;

(2) provide for the elimination of the need for retakes of diagnostic radiologic procedures;

(3) provide for the elimination of unproductive screening programs;

(4) provide for the optimum diagnostic information with minimum radiologic exposure; and

(5) include the therapeutic application of radiation to individuals in the treatment of disease, including nuclear medicine applications.

(Pub. L. 97–35, title IX, §982, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 601; Pub. L. 102–54, §13(q)(13)(B), June 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 281.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–54 substituted "Secretary of Veterans Affairs" for "Administrator of Veterans' Affairs" in introductory provisions.
### Division A—General Provisions
#### § 1239.1 Scope.

This part establishes a consumer product safety standard for gates and enclosures.
### subpart ii—public transportation by intercity and commuter rail
### §10173b. Review Panel

#### (a) In general

The Review Panel required to be established by section 10173a(b)(1) of this title shall consist of a Chairman selected by the Secretary in consultation with the Governor of the State or governing body of the Indian tribe, as appropriate, that is party to such agreement and 6 other members as follows:

(1) 2 members selected by the Governor of such State or governing body of such Indian tribe;

(2) 2 members selected by units of local government affected by the repository or monitored retrievable storage facility;

(3) 1 member to represent persons making payments into the Waste Fund, to be selected by the Secretary; and

(4) 1 member to represent other public interests, to be selected by the Secretary.

#### (b) Terms

(1) The members of the Review Panel shall serve for terms of 4 years each.

(2) Members of the Review Panel who are not full-time employees of the Federal Government, shall receive a per diem compensation for each day spent conducting work of the Review Panel, including their necessary travel or other expenses while engaged in the work of the Review Panel.

(3) Expenses of the Panel shall be paid by the Secretary from the Waste Fund.

#### (c) Duties

The Review Panel shall—

(1) advise the Secretary on matters relating to the proposed repository or monitored retrievable storage facility, including issues relating to design, construction, operation, and decommissioning of the facility;

(2) evaluate performance of the repository or monitored retrievable storage facility, as it considers appropriate;

(3) recommend corrective actions to the Secretary;

(4) assist in the presentation of State or affected Indian tribe and local perspectives to the Secretary; and

(5) participate in the planning for and the review of preoperational data on environmental, demographic, and socioeconomic conditions of the site and the local community.

#### (d) Information

The Secretary shall promptly 1 make available promptly 1 any information in the Secretary's possession requested by the Panel or its Chairman.

#### (e) Chapter 10 of title 5

The requirements of chapter 10 of title 5 shall not apply to a Review Panel established under this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 97–425, title I, §172, as added Pub. L. 100–202, §101(d) [title III, §300], Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1329–104, 1329–121; Pub. L. 100–203, title V, §5031, Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–239; amended Pub. L. 117–286, §4(a)(272), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4335.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 100–202 and Pub. L. 100–203 added identical sections.

#### Amendments

2022—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 117–286 substituted "Chapter 10 of title 5" for "Federal Advisory Committee Act" in heading and "chapter 10 of title 5" for "the Federal Advisory Committee Act" in text.

1 So in original.
### [§§3495 to 3498. Vacant]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Prior to renumbering of sections 1651 to 1693 of this chapter as sections 3451 to 3493 by Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 406, sections 1695 to 1698 of this chapter, which comprised former subchapter VI of this chapter, were repealed by Pub. L. 96–466, title VI, §601(a)(1), title VIII, §802(f), Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2208, 2218, effective Oct. 1, 1980.

Section 1695, added Pub. L. 91–219, title II, §204(a)(4), Mar. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 80, set forth purpose of former subchapter VI relating to a predischarge education program and defined "eligible person" for purposes of such subchapter.

Section 1696, added Pub. L. 91–219, title II, §204(a)(4), Mar. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 80; amended Pub. L. 92–540, title I, §102(5), title III, §307, Oct. 24, 1972, 86 Stat. 1075, 1081; Pub. L. 93–508, title I, §102(5), Dec. 3, 1974, 88 Stat. 1580; Pub. L. 93–602, title II, §203(c), Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1958; Pub. L. 94–502, title II, §§201(4), 210(5), 211(13), Oct. 15, 1976, 90 Stat. 2385, 2388, 2389; Pub. L. 95–202, title I, §102(6), Nov. 23, 1977, 91 Stat. 1434, related to payment of an educational assistance allowance.

Section 1697, added Pub. L. 91–219, title II, §204(a)(4), Mar. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 81, related to educational and vocational guidance.

Section 1698, added Pub. L. 92–540, title III, §308, Oct. 24, 1972, 86 Stat. 1082, §1697A; renumbered §1698 and amended Pub. L. 94–502, title II, §§210(3), 211(14), Oct. 15, 1976, 90 Stat. 2388, 2389; Pub. L. 95–202, title III, §302(b), Nov. 23, 1977, 91 Stat. 1441, related to coordination with and participation by Department of Defense in carrying out functions and duties of Department of Defense under predischarge education program.
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-20085

(Summary Calendar)

PAUL MAPLES,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

PASADENA INDEPENDENT

SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(H-96-CV-1753)

July 15, 1997

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Plaintiff-Appellant Paul Ma ples asks us to reverse the

judgment of the district court dismissing his original and amended

complaints pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).2

Specifica lly, Maples presents for our review alleged reversible

error by the district court in its determination that Maples had

neither a protected property nor liberty interest and did not state

a “First Amendment retaliation claim.” Additionally, in his

Statement of the Case on appeal, Maples makes reference to the

court’s failure to address his intentional infliction of emotional

distress claim and the court’s ruling regarding the statute of

limitations.

In our de novo review we have carefully studied the record on

appeal and the facts, law, and arguments presented by counsel in

their briefs to this court. We have also considered the patiently

exhaustive discussion and explanation of this case as set forth in

the Memorandum and Order of the district court filed December 24,

1996. Based on our review, we are persuaded that the district

court correctly analyzed this case and the pleadings in light of

the facts and the law and reached the correct conclusions for the

right reasons. We would serve no useful purpose by writing

further, given the disposition of this case by the district court.

Consequently, the rulings and judgment of the district court are,

in all respects,

AFFIRMED.
§ 734.18 Activities that are not exports, reexports, or transfers. ( a ) *Activities that are not exports, reexports, or transfers.* The following activities are not exports, reexports, or transfers: ( 1 ) Launching a spacecraft, launch vehicle, payload, or other item into space.
( 2 ) Transmitting or otherwise transferring “technology” or “software” to a person in the United States who is not a foreign person from another person in the United States.
( 3 ) Transmitting or otherwise making a transfer (in-country) within the same foreign country of “technology” or “software” between or among only persons who are not “foreign persons,” so long as the transmission or transfer does not result in a release to a foreign person or to a person prohibited from receiving the “technology” or “software.”
( 4 ) Shipping, moving, or transferring items between or among the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands or any territory, dependency, or possession of the United States as listed in Schedule C, Classification Codes and Descriptions for U.S. Export Statistics, issued by the Bureau of the Census.
( 5 ) Sending, taking, or storing “technology” or “software” that is: ( i ) Unclassified;
( ii ) Secured using 'end-to-end encryption;'
( iii ) Secured using cryptographic modules (hardware or “software”) compliant with Federal Information Processing Standards Publication 140-2 (FIPS 140-2) or its successors, supplemented by “software” implementation, cryptographic key management and other procedures and controls that are in accordance with guidance provided in current U.S. National Institute for Standards and Technology publications, or other equally or more effective cryptographic means; and
( iv ) Not intentionally stored in a country listed in Country Group D:5 (*see* supplement no. 1 to part 740 of the EAR). Note 1 to paragraph ( a
)(5)( iv
):
Data in-transit via the internet is not deemed to be stored.
( b ) *Definitions.* For purposes of this section, *End-to-end encryption* means (i) the provision of cryptographic protection of data such that the data is not in unencrypted form between an originator (or the originator's in-country security boundary) and an intended recipient (or the recipient's in-country security boundary), and (ii) the means of decryption are not provided to any third party. The originator and the recipient may be the same person.
( c ) *Ability to access “technology” or “software” in encrypted form.* The ability to access “technology” or “software” in encrypted form that satisfies the criteria set forth in paragraph (a)(5) of this section does not constitute the release or export of such “technology” or “software.”
[81 FR 35604, June 3, 2016, as amended at 82 FR 61156, Dec. 27, 2017; 89 FR 40371, May 10, 2024]
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION - ELIMINATION

MD 10.10 RECRUITMENT DT-15-09

Volume 10,

Part 2:

Personnel Management

Position Evaluation and Management, Pay Administration, and Leave

Approved By: Mark A. Satorius

Executive Director for Operations

Date Approved: May 5, 2015

Expiration Date: May 5, 2020

Issuing Office: Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer 

Human Resources Policy and Programs Team

Contact Name: Alison Tallarico 

301-287-0740

Servicing Human Resources Specialist 

(names and phone numbers are listed here) 

Subject: Elimination of MD 10.10

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Guidance found in Management Directive (MD) 10.10, "Recruitment," has been updated and 

consolidated and may now be found in MD 10.1, "Recruitment, Appointments, and Merit 

Staffing." Therefore, MD 10.10 is eliminated.

Directive and Handbook 10.1 consolidate and revise the following guidance:

• Practices relating to employment and policies and practices regarding merit staffing

activities within the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission;

• Policy, practices, and procedures for recruiting highly qualified applicants for vacant

positions within the NRC; and

• Guidance for NRC employees who participate on recruiting trips or other recruiting

activities.