alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 227 (Friday, November 26, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69025-69026]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26095]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed the Week Ending November 
12, 2004

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the provisions of 49 U.S.C. Sections 412 and 414. 
Answers may be filed within 21 days after the filing of the 
application.
    Docket Number: OST-2004-19633.
    Date Filed: November 9, 2004.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject:
     PTC31 N&C/CIRC 0286 dated 12 November 2004

[[Page 69026]]

     TC31 North and Central Pacific Japan-North American, Caribbean
     Expedited Resolution 002bd
     PTC31 N&C/CIRC 0287 dated 12 November 2004
     TC31 North and Central Pacific
     TC3-Central America, South America
     Expedited Resolution 002bz r1-r4
     Intended effective date: 15 January 2005.

    Docket Number: OST-2004-19636.
    Date Filed: November 10, 2004.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject:
     PTC2 EUR 0590 dated 5 November 2004
     PTC2 Within Europe Resolutions r1-r21
     Minutes: PTC2 EUR 0587 dated 2 November 2004
     Tables: PTC2 EUR Fares 0107 dated 5 November 2004
     Intended effective date: 1 March 2005.

Andrea M. Jenkins,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 04-26095 Filed 11-24-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
No: 15-053 August 21, 2015

CONTACT: Dave McIntyre, 301-415-8200

NRC to Hold Public Meetings in Maryland and Nevada on 

Yucca Mountain Environmental Report Supplement

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a series of public meetings at agency 

headquarters in Rockville, Md., and in Nevada to seek public comment on a supplement to the 

Department of Energy’s Environmental Impact Statement for a proposed geologic high-level nuclear 

waste repository at Yucca Mountain.

The draft supplement, which evaluates the proposed repository’s potential impacts on 

groundwater and from surface discharges of groundwater, was released on Aug. 13. The public 

comment period begins today, with publication of a notice in the Federal Register and ends Oct. 20. 

The NRC staff will hold a public conference call Aug. 26 from 2-3 p.m. Eastern Time to explain how to 

submit comments. Call-in information is available on the NRC website. Procedures for submitting 

comments are also explained in today’s Federal Register notice.

The first public meeting to present the draft supplement’s findings and accept public comments 

will be held Sept. 3 from 3-5 p.m. at NRC Headquarters, Commission Hearing Room, 11555 Rockville 

Pike in Rockville. Call-in and webcast information will be available on the NRC’s Public Meetings 

Page for anyone unable to attend in person.

Two subsequent meetings will be held in Nevada on Sept. 15 at the Embassy Suites Convention 

Center, 3600 Paradise Road in Las Vegas, and Sept. 17 at the Amargosa Community Center, 821 E. 

Amargosa Farm Road, in Amargosa Valley. Both meetings will run from 7-9 p.m. Pacific Time. NRC 

staff members will be available for an open house for one hour before each of the Nevada meetings to 

meet informally with members of the public.

On Oct. 15, the NRC staff will conduct a final public meeting by conference call, from 2-4 p.m. 

Eastern Time. Phone line information will be posted on the Public Meetings Page.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3552 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3552

               To extend the additional duty on ethanol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 2, 2011

  Mr. Rangel (for himself, Mr. Burton of Indiana, Mr. Payne, and Mr. 
    Engel) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               To extend the additional duty on ethanol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ADDITIONAL DUTY ON ETHANOL.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9901.00.50 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``1/1/2012'' in 
the effective period column and inserting ``1/1/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 996.1 Purpose and scope.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) was mandated to develop and implement a quality assurance program that is equally available to all applicants, under which the Administrator may certify hydrographic products that satisfy standards promulgated by the Administrator. “Hydrographic products” are any publicly or commercially available products produced by a non-Federal entity that include or display hydrographic data. The procedures established here by which hydrographic products are proposed for certification; by which standards and compliance tests are developed, adopted, and applied for those products; and by which certification may be awarded or denied are the mandated Quality Assurance Program. The execution of those procedures for specific hydrographic products is the implementation of the program.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 6015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Petitioner

- Appellee ,

v. JAMES DOW VANDIVERE , Respondent

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever III, District Judge. ( 5:15

- hc

- 02017

- D )

Submitted : April 4, 2019 Decided: April 10, 2019

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

James Dow Vandivere , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: James Dow Vandivere was committed to the custody of the Attorney General pursuant t o the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 as a sexually dangerous person

. Vandivere appealed, and this court affirmed the district court’s judgment. During the pendency of his appeal, Vandivere filed a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4) to set aside the commitment judgment as void for lack of jurisdiction

. Vandivere also filed a motion to compel, arguing that the district court was required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(a)(1) to set forth in detail its fact ual and legal bases for its ruling on the motion to set aside judgment. The district court denied both motions, and Vandivere appealed. We have reviewed the record and find no error warranting reversal

. The district court did not reversibly err in deny ing Vandivere’s request for Rule 60(b)(4) relief because none of the criteria for granting such relief were met in this case. See Wendt v. Leonard , 431 F.3d 410, 412

- 13 (4th Cir. 2005). Additionally, to comply with Rule 52(a)(1), a district court “need o nly make brief, definite, pertinent findings and conclusions upon the contested matters; there is no necessity for over

- elaboration of detail or particularization of facts .” Torres

- Laz arini v. United States , 523 F.3d 69, 74 (1st Cir. 2008); see Darter v. Greenville Comm. Hotel Corp. , 301 F.2d 70, 75 (4th Cir. 1962) ( explaining that Rule 52(a) “does not require” a district court to “make detailed evidentiary findings” (internal quotation marks omitted))

. The district court’ s determination in its denial order that Vandivere’s request for Rule 60(b)(4) relief “lack[ed] merit” satisfied this standard. See Darter , 301 F.2d at 7 5.3 Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s order

. United States v. Vandivere , No. 5:15

- hc

- 02017

- D (E.D.N.C. Dec. 21, 2018) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
§ 23.26 Misrepresentation as to varietal name. ( a ) It is unfair or deceptive to mark or describe an industry product with the incorrect varietal name.
( b ) The following are examples of markings or descriptions that may be misleading: ( 1 ) Use of the term “yellow emerald” to describe golden beryl or heliodor.
( 2 ) Use of the term “green amethyst” to describe prasiolite.
Note to § 23.26 :
A varietal name is given for a division of gem species or genus based on a color, type of optical phenomenon, or other distinguishing characteristic of appearance.
#### § 1018.21 Calling of meetings.

Advisory committees shall, as a general rule, meet four times per year, except that, as provided by statute, the Toxicological Advisory Board shall meet not less than two times each year. No advisory committee shall hold a meeting without advance approval of the Chairman or the Commission official designated under § 1018.23(a). Before giving such advance approval, the Chairman or Commission official shall notify the Commission of the date of the proposed meeting.

[41 FR 45822, Oct. 18, 1976, as amended at 43 FR 60876, Dec. 29, 1978]
**UNPUBLISHED**

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

___________________

No. 16

- 2451

(7:08

- cr

- 00043

- D

- 1)

___________________

In re: KUNTA KENTA REDD

,

Petitioner

.

___________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

___________________

Submi tted: December 29, 2016 Decided: December 29

, 2 016

___________________

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and DIAZ , Circuit

J udges.

____________________

Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

____________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

This case comes before the court on a petition for writ of

mandamus filed by Ku nta Kenta Redd under the Crime Victims'

Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3771 ("CVRA"). The CVRA affords to

victims of crime the rights to reasonable protection from the

accused, to notice of court proceedings, to participation

in court proceedings, to confer with government counsel, to

receive restitution, to proceedings free from unreasonable

delay, and to be treated with fairness. 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a).

These rights must be asserted in the district court and, if

the district court denies relief, the movant may petition

the court of appeals for a writ of mandamus. 18 U.S.C. §

3771(d)(3). If such a petition is filed, "[t]he court of

appeals shall take up and decide such application forthwith

within 72 hours after the petition has been filed." Id. If

the court of appeals denies the relief sought, "the reasons for

the denial shall be clearly stated on the record in a written

opinion." Id.

Petitioner maintains that he is entitled to relief under

the CV RA as a result of alleged plea bargaining abuse. He

asserts that he should be allowed to reopen his plea and sentence.

He seeks to bring charges against certain “suspects” and against

an Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms agent. He challenges the3 veracity of various suspects or informant s. He asserts that the

district court and the court of appeals have erred in their

rulings in volving his criminal case and implies the courts are

biased against him.

Petitioner is not a crime victim under the CVRA . He pled

guilty, pursuant to a written plea agreement, to one count of

conspiracy to distribute and to possess with the intent to

distribute cocaine and 50 grams or m ore of cocaine base, in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 846. He has challenged his conviction

and sentence on appeal and in various po st

- conviction

proceedings. The CVRA defines a “crime victim” as a “person

directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of

a Federal offense or an offense in the District of Columbia.”

18 U.S.C. § 3771(e )(2)( A ). Redd clearly does not come within

the statutory definition . The CVRA also provides that “[a]

person accused of the crime may not obtain any form of relief

under thi s chapter.” 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d) (l)

.

Accordingly, the court dismisses the petition for writ

of mandamus.

PETITION DISMISSED
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 159 (Friday, August 16, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 50041]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-20115]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Friday, September 6, 2013.

PLACE: 1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance, Examinations, and Enforcement 
Matters. In the event that the time, date, or place of this meeting 
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, 
or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's Web site at 
http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Melissa D. Jurgens, 202-418-5516.

Natise Stowe,
Executive Assistant.
[FR Doc. 2013-20115 Filed 8-14-13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 5 (Tuesday, January 8, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 81]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00025]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP19-504-000.
    Applicants: MarkWest Pioneer, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Conforming and Nonconforming 
Negotiated Rate Service Agreements to be effective 1/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 12/28/18.
    Accession Number: 20181228-5078.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/9/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-505-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: 122818 Negotiated Rates--
Mercuria Energy America, Inc. R-7540-02 to be effective 1/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 12/28/18.
    Accession Number: 20181228-5155.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/9/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-506-000.
    Applicants: Crossroads Pipeline Company.
    Description: Penalty Revenue Crediting Report of Crossroads 
Pipeline Company under RP19-506.
    Filed Date: 12/28/18.
    Accession Number: 20181228-5179.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/9/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-507-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gulf Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Penalty Revenue Crediting Report of Columbia Gulf 
Transmission, LLC under RP19-507.
    Filed Date: 12/28/18.
    Accession Number: 20181228-5180.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/9/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-508-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Penalty Revenue Crediting Report of Columbia Gas 
Transmission, LLC under RP19-508.
    Filed Date: 12/28/18.
    Accession Number: 20181228-5182.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/9/19.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: December 31, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-00025 Filed 1-7-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### § 996.33 Acceptance of program by non-Federal entities.

By their voluntary entrance or participation in this Quality Assurance Program or its activities, all parties acknowledge and accept the procedures established by this program, including the finality of decisions. All parties acknowledge and accept that information submitted to NOAA under this Program shall be deemed to be in the public domain, and no representation is made as to the protection of confidential, proprietary or otherwise restricted information.
#### National Bank of the Republic of Chicago, Defendant in Error; v. Francis Cropper, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 21,216.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Hugh J. Kearns, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the March term, 1915.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed December 6, 1915.

Statement of the Case.

Action by the National Bank of the Republic of Chicago, plaintiff, against Francis Cropper, defendant, on seven promissory notes for rent drawn by defendant, to order of Joseph Klor, his landlord, and by the latter indorsed in blank. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

Klor was accustomed to hold checks for a long time before presenting them to the bank for payment. Cropper had been Klor’s tenant for years, and gave him a check for rent every month. All the checks so given had been paid by the bank and returned to Cropper except the seven checks sued on. Cropper closed his account with the plaintiff bank June 15, 1912, and sold his business to Stein. June 17, 1912, Klor had in his possession the seven checks in question. On that day he indorsed them in blank and delivered them to Struve, Cropper’s manager, and for them Struve gave Klor his check on the plaintiff bank for $641.62, the sum the seven checks amounted to. June 26, 1912, the check Struve gave to Klor was paid to Klor by the bank. Struve, by accident or otherwise, failed to deposit with the bank the seven checks he received from Cropper, and as a result his account was overdrawn about $615. About six months after Cropper closed his bank account with the bank, the seven checks sued on were found in the drawer of a typewriter desk in the office of the Francis Cropper Company, the sue*297cessor in business of Francis Cropper, of which company Struve was the manager. In September, 1915, Struve gave the checks sued on to the attorneys of the plaintiff bank, and told them to give the checks to the bank as security for their claim against him.

Abstract of the Decision.

Bills and notes, § *451*
      ***
      *—when evidence sufficient to sustain finding that notes were not paid.*In an action by a bank on several promissory notes against the maker, evidence *held*sufficient to sustain a finding that the notes had not been paid.

There was no evidence tending to show a direct payment of the checks by Cropper. His contention was that Klor was paid for the checks by Struve out of funds in his possession belonging to Cropper. This contention was supported at the trial only by the testimony of defendant’s attorney in the cause in the Municipal Court and in this court as to an admission by Struve, and his testimony was contradicted by Struve.

T. F. Monahan, for plaintiff in error.

Newman, Poppenhusen & Stern, for defendant in error; Lawrence A. Cohen, of counsel.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice Baker

delivered the opinion of the court.
### **CHAPTER 7A—TEMPORARY UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION PROGRAM**
EXHIBIT 32.1

                      CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE 1ST BANCORP
   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 REGARDING QUARTERLY
            REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2007


     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Service 1st Bancorp, a California corporation
("Bancorp"), does hereby certify that:

1.   Bancorp's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
     2007 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   Information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bancorp.




Date:  May 14, 2007                     By:     /s/ JOHN O. BROOKS
                                               ---------------------------------
                                                John O. Brooks
                                                Chief Executive Officer
                                                (Principal Executive Officer)

Date: May 14, 2007                      By:     /s/ ROBERT E. BLOCH
                                               ---------------------------------
                                                Robert E. Bloch
                                                Executive Vice President and
                                                Chief financial Officer
                                                (Principal Financial and
                                                Accounting Officer)

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Service 1st Bancorp and will be retained by Service 1st Bancorp
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.