alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Lawrence Ruden, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of PR Specialists, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(C)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  July 28, 2009

/s/ Lawrence Ruden

Lawrence Ruden

Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
#### John R. Beanland *et al.,*d/b/a Beanland Drilling Company, Plaintiffs-Appellees, *v.*Fred Sweitzer *et al.,*Defendants-Appellants.

(No. 73-343;

Fifth District

July 23, 1974.

CREBS, J., took no part.

James W. Sanders, of Marion, for appellants.

R. Corydon Finch, of Anna, for appellees.

*122PER CURIAM:

Judgment was entered on a jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs in the amount of $2537. Defendants have appealed seeking reversal and re-mandment for a new trial.

Plaintiffs-appellees have moved to affirm the judgment, on the grounds that the defendants did not file a post-Mai motion, and therefore failed to preserve a basis for review by this court.

We believe plaintiffs-appellees’ interpretation of section 68.1 of the Civil Practice Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 110, par. 68.1) is correct. *Roberson v.*Leak, 72 Ill.App.2d 11, 218 N.E.2d 819; *Farnsworth v. Shops Budding,*77 Ill.App.2d 44, 222 N.E.2d 132.

Judgment affirmed.

Mr. JUSTICE CREBS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
NRC SCHEDULES TWO MEETINGS ON APRIL 17 

WITH GLOBAL NUCLEAR FUEL-AMERICAS IN WILMINGTON 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled two separate meetings with Global 

Nuclear Fuel-Americas LLC in Wilmington, N.C., for April 17 to discuss the facility’s integrated 

safety analysis as well as the results of the NRC’s performance review for the company’s commercial 

nuclear fuel fabrication plant.

The first meeting is scheduled for 1 p.m. at the Global Nuclear Fuel facility, 3901 Castle Hayne 

Road in Wilmington. NRC and Global staff will discuss the status of the company’s integrated safety 

analysis, or ISA, revision project. An ISA is a look at a facility’s processes, equipment and employee 

actions to ensure that hazards have been evaluated and protective measures identified. The meeting 

will be open to members of the public and the news media. NRC staff members will be available 

following the business portion of the meeting to answer questions or provide additional information.

The second meeting is planned for 6 p.m. in the Azalea Coast Room A of the Student Center at 

the University of North Carolina at Wilmington, which is located at 601 South College Road. NRC 

staff will discuss the agency’s assessment of the company’s regulatory safety performance from 

January 2011 to December 2012. That meeting will also be open to the public and media, and NRC 

staff members will again be available to answer questions or provide additional information.

The NRC staff assessed performance at the Global Nuclear Fuel-Americas in the areas of safety 

operations, radiological controls, facility support and special topics. The NRC staff review determined 

that Global continues to conduct its activities safely and securely, protecting public health and the 

environment.

“The NRC inspects nuclear fuel facilities such as Global and monitors their performance on an 

ongoing basis,” said NRC Region II Administrator Victor McCree. “We issue inspection reports and 

hold these meetings near each facility to discuss our oversight and answer any questions local residents 

may have.”

The NRC review letter for the Global facility is available on the NRC website. 

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES link on 

the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's 

website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No: II-13-013

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416 

 April 8, 2013

E-mail: OPA2.Resource@nrc.gov
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Computer Software Innovations, Inc.
(the Company), each certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his or her knowledge on the date of this certification:



| | 1. | The annual report of the Company on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Nancy K. HedrickNancy K. HedrickChief Executive OfficerDate: April 2, 2007/s/ David B. DechantDavid B. DechantChief Financial OfficerDate: April 2, 2007
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                  | Medical International Technology, Inc. |                                          |
|-------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                                                  |                                   |                                          |   |
| Date: December 29, 2010      | By:                                    | /s/ Karim Menassa                   |   |
|                                                  |                                   | Karim Menassa                                 |   |
|                                                  |                                   | President and Principal Executive Officer     |   |
|                                                  |                                   | Interim Secretary and Chief Financial Officer |   |
§ 280.313 Recordal of additional insignia. ( a ) A manufacturer to whom the Director, USPTO, has issued an alphanumeric designation may apply for recordal of its trademark for fasteners if the trademark is the subject of a duly filed application or is registered in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on the Principal Register. Upon recordal, either the alphanumeric designation or the trademark, or both, may be used as recorded insignias.
( b ) A manufacturer for whom the Director, USPTO, has recorded a trademark as its fastener insignia may apply for issuance and recordal of an alphanumeric designation as a fastener insignia. Upon recordal, either the alphanumeric designation or the trademark, or both, may be used as recorded insignias.
[61 FR 50558, Sept. 26, 1996. Redesignated and amended at 65 FR 39803, June 28, 2000]
Phillip L, Kiddoo

Air Pollution Control Offìcer

GNnrr BESIN I.]NrnrpD AIR POIIUTION COxrnoL DISTRICT

157 Short Street, Bishop, Califomia 9351,4-3537

7 60-872-8271. F ax: 7 60-872-61.09

B/O #160516-05a

Ill4ay 16,2076

I HEREBY CERTIFY that at a regular meeting of the Great Basin Unif,red Air Pollution Control

District Goveming Board held in the Mono County Supervisors Chambers, Bridgeport, California on

May 16, 2016 an order was duly made and entered as follows:

AcsNpe Irev #5n: CoNsnNr AcnNua

A motion was made by Stump and seconded by Hames approving consent agenda item a as follows:

a) Approval of the April 13, 2016 Governing Board meeting minutes

Ayes: Board Members - Stump, Griffiths, Rawson, Bacon

Noes: Ø

Abstain: Bacon, Johnston

Absent: Kingsley

Motion carried 410 and so ordered.

ATTEST:

It

\,_ h-,- /'_uri4,, - ---

Tori DeHaven, Clerk of the Board
## Flour Milling Products (MQ20A, formerly M20A)

e-mail

----

----

----

----

1997
1998
1999

----

First Quarter
Second Quarter

----

First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter

----

First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter

----

----

1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992

----

First Quarter 
Second Quarter 

----

----

1997
1996
1995
1994
1993

----

First Quarter 
Second Quarter 

----

----

1997
1998
1999

----

First Quarter 
Second Quarter 

----

First Quarter 
Second Quarter 
Third Quarter 
Fourth Quarter 

----

First Quarter 
Second Quarter 
Third Quarter 
Fourth Quarter 

----

----

e-mail

----

----

Go back to list of Current Industrial Reports
Go back to Census Bureau Home Page

----

----

Source:  U.S. Census Bureau
No: III-15-001 January 7, 2015

CONTACT: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663

NRC Schedules Regulatory Conference to Discuss Apparent Violation at 

Palisades Nuclear Plant

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a regulatory conference with officials of 

Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., on Tuesday, Jan. 13, to discuss a preliminary finding related to

occupational dose limits for workers at the Palisades nuclear plant. The plant is located in Covert, 

Mich., five miles south of South Haven.

NRC and company officials will discuss the significance of the inspection finding connected to

an activity performed during the February-March 2014 refueling outage. The finding involves a failure 

to ensure an accurate assessment of the dose received by personnel working in a high radiation area.

The incident did not result in any of the workers exceeding the occupational annual dose limit 

of five rem and had no negative impact on the plant or the public.

The meeting is scheduled for 1-3 p.m. in the NRC’s Region III office, located at 2443 

Warrenville Road, in Lisle, Ill. The public is invited to observe and NRC officials will be available to 

answer questions. Members of the public who are not able to attend the meeting can participate by 

dialing 888-810-3950 with passcode 5477675 or by submitting questions directly related to the 

regulatory conference by email to Patricia.Lougheed@nrc.gov with “Reg Conference” in the subject 

line. 

The NRC evaluates regulatory performance at commercial nuclear power plants with a colorcoded system that classifies findings as green, white, yellow or red, in increasing order of safety 

significance. The NRC’s preliminary evaluation determined that the violation at Palisades was white, or 

of low to moderate safety significance. 

No decisions on the final safety significance or other NRC actions will be made at the meeting. 

The NRC will issue the final determination on the safety significance of the issue after a thorough

review of all the information related to the incident, including the input provided by Entergy during the 

regulatory conference. 

The NRC inspection report which documents the apparent violation is publicly available on the 

NRC website.
### SUBCHAPTER VI—SOURCE MATERIAL
November 5, 2015 

Dear Mr. Constine: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition 

(Docket No. FAA−2015−3274). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) to process your petition. 

 Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s) (i.e., fixed-wing, rotorcraft, 

lighter-than-air) for the proposed UAS operation. The description(s) should include the 

maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located in the 

aircraft manual(s). 

 Your petition references the material(s) listed below, however the material(s) was/were 

not submitted for the record. Please provide a copy of the following referenced 

materials: 

o Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or 

electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any 

further, we must receive the information described above by 11/19/15. If we do not receive the 

information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### July 29, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 136246 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 136246 COA: 270415 Oakland CC: 2004-194560-FH CAMILLA MARIE DENISON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 26, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

p0721 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 29, 2008

Clerk
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Endeavour International Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2004 (the Report), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, John N. Seitz, Co-Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ John N. SeitzJohn N. SeitzCo-Chief Executive Officer March 11, 2005 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Endeavour International Corporation and will be retained by Endeavour International Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §17101. Definitions

In this chapter, the following definitions apply:

(1) Federal government.—The term "Federal Government" includes the government of the District of Columbia.

(2) Motor vehicle.—The term "motor vehicle" means a vehicle, self-propelled or drawn by mechanical power, designed for use on the highways principally for the transportation of passengers, except a vehicle designed or used for military field training, combat, or tactical purposes.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1279.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 17101 | 40:703. | Pub. L. 88–515, §3, Aug. 30, 1964, 78 Stat. 696. |

Section

In clause (1), the words "the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of the Government of the United States" are omitted as unnecessary.
### subpart 2—promoting safe and stable families
§ 1215.2 Requirements for infant bath seats. Each infant bath seat shall comply with all applicable provisions of ASTM F1967-19, Standard Consumer Safety Specification for Infant Bath Seats, approved May 1, 2019. The Director of the Federal Register approves the incorporation by reference listed in this section in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. You may obtain a copy of this ASTM standard from ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959 USA; phone: 610-832-9585; *www.astm.org .* You may inspect a copy at the Division of the Secretariat, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Room 820, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, telephone 301-504-7923, or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, email *fedreg.legal@nara.gov ,* or go to: *www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html .* [84 FR 49439, Sept. 20, 2019]
§ 766.21 Appeals. ( a ) *Grounds.* For proceedings charging violations relating to part 760 of the EAR, a party may appeal to the Under Secretary from an order disposing of a proceeding or an order denying a petition to set aside a default or a petition for reopening, on the grounds: ( 1 ) That a necessary finding of fact is omitted, erroneous or unsupported by substantial evidence of record;
( 2 ) That a necessary legal conclusion or finding is contrary to law;
( 3 ) That prejudicial procedural error occurred, or
( 4 ) That the decision or the extent of sanctions is arbitrary, capricious or an abuse of discretion. The appeal must specify the grounds on which the appeal is based and the provisions of the order from which the appeal is taken.
( b ) *Filing of appeal.* An appeal from an order must be filed with the Office of the Under Secretary for Export Administration, Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room H-3898, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, within 30 days after service of the order appealed from. If the Under Secretary cannot act on an appeal for any reason, the Under Secretary will designate another Department of Commerce official to receive and act on the appeal.
( c ) *Effect of appeal.* The filing of an appeal shall not stay the operation of any order, unless the order by its express terms so provides or unless the Under Secretary, upon application by a party and with opportunity for response, grants a stay.
( d ) *Appeal procedure.* The Under Secretary normally will not hold hearings or entertain oral argument on appeals. A full written statement in support of the appeal must be filed with the appeal and be simultaneously served on all parties, who shall have 30 days from service to file a reply. At his/her discretion, the Under Secretary may accept new submissions, but will not ordinarily accept those submissions filed more than 30 days after the filing of the reply to the appellant's first submission.
( e ) *Decisions.* The decision will be in writing and will be accompanied by an order signed by the Under Secretary giving effect to the decision. The order may either dispose of the case by affirming, modifying or reversing the order of the administrative law judge or may refer the case back to the administrative law judge for further proceedings.
### §11922. Clearinghouse on drug abuse in public housing

#### (a) Establishment

The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall establish, in the Office of Public Housing in the Department of Housing and Urban Development, a clearinghouse to receive, collect, process, and assemble information regarding the abuse of controlled substances in public housing projects.

#### (b) Functions

The clearinghouse established under subsection (a) shall—

(1) respond to inquiries by members of the public requesting assistance in investigating, studying, and working on the problem of the abuse of controlled substances; and

(2) receive, collect, process, assemble, and provide information on programs, authorities, institutions, and agencies, that may further assist members of the public requesting information from the clearinghouse.

(Pub. L. 100–690, title V, §5143, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4303.)