alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 28.605 Inspector General report. ( a ) The Inspector General, or other official as specified in paragraph (b) of this section, of each agency shall prepare and submit to Congress each year, commencing with submission of the President's Budget in 1991, an evaluation of the compliance of that agency with, and the effectiveness of, the requirements herein. The evaluation may include any recommended changes that may be necessary to strengthen or improve the requirements.
( b ) In the case of an agency that does not have an Inspector General, the agency official comparable to an Inspector General shall prepare and submit the annual report, or, if there is no such comparable official, the head of the agency shall prepare and submit the annual report.
( c ) The annual report shall be submitted at the same time the agency submits its annual budget justifications to Congress.
( d ) The annual report shall include the following: All alleged violations relating to the agency's covered Federal actions during the year covered by the report, the actions taken by the head of the agency in the year covered by the report with respect to those alleged violations and alleged violations in previous years, and the amounts of civil penalties imposed by the agency in the year covered by the report.
Draft Summary 9/9 & 10/2014

U.S. Department of Energy

Manufactured Housing Working Group

September 9 - 10, 2014

Summary

Day 1: September 9, 2014**

9:00 – 9:30 Introductions (including remote), housekeeping

9:30 – 10:00 Opening remarks by the WG members

10:00 – 12:00 DOE (Navigant): LCC Presentation (Including Fuel Types), Initial 

cost/performance plotting, discussion, identify any additional 

runs/analysis

12:00 – 1:00 LUNCH BREAK

1:00 – 3:00 Subcommittee Reports

 Finance (Stacey Epperson)

 (Please note, this is not related to affordability)

 Manufacturing (David Tompos)

 Trial Standard Levels (Michael Lubliner)

 2015 IECC Scope (Manny Santana)

3:00 – 4:30 Review of new LCC runs and additional analysis

4:30 – 5:00 Public Comment, other DOE administrative items, next steps, 

conclude

Day 2: September 10, 2014**

9:00 – 9:30 WG Comment

9:30 – 12:00 Continue Subcommittee Reports

 Finance (Stacey Epperson)

 (Please note, this is not related to affordability)

 Manufacturing (David Tompos)

 Trial Standard Levels (Michael Lubliner)

 2015 IECC Scope (Manny Santana)

12:00 – 1:00 LUNCH BREAK

1:00 – 2:00 Affordability Concept (Robin Roy)

2:00 – 3:00 Straw Man Proposals and Position Paper Review (Emanuel Levy)

3:00 – 4:00 Term Sheet Structure/Definitions (Navigant)

4:00 – 5:00 Public Comment, Recap/Review, Next Steps, Homework, Review 

Schedule and Wrap-up Comments

** Breaks at the request of the group
Draft Summary 9/9 & 10/2014

DATE Location Room Webinar Link

September 9, 2014 DOE Forrestal 8E-089 https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/887855449

September 10, 2014 DOE Forrestal 8E-089 https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/896904784

September 22, 2014 DOE Forrestal GH-019 https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/915091240

September 23, 2014 DOE Forrestal GH-019 https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/278235472

October 1, 2014 DOE Forrestal GH-019 https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/585091001

October 2, 2014 DOE Forrestal GH-019 https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/726540504
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD ANN ARBOR, MI 48105
- 2498

OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION December 16 , 2010 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Meeting with Daimler FROM: Angela Cullen, Mechanical Engineer TO: Docket EPA
- HQ
- OAR
- 2010
- 0162 This memorandum documents a meeting held on Thurs day , December 9 , 2010 b etween Daimler , DOT, and EPA and included the following individuals: Daimler: Brian Burton, David Kayes, Donald Keski

- Hy nmila, Mark Groeneweg DOT: Maurice Hicks, Greg Powell EPA: By ron Bunker, Cle Jackson, Jay Smith, Arvon Mitcham, Julian Davis , Chuck Moulis , and Angela Cullen The discussion focused on clarification of the proposed standards and credit programs for heavy

duty engines and vehicles.
#### § 240.6 Tolerances.

(a) When lime is packed in barrels the tolerance to be allowed on the large barrel or the small barrel of lime shall be 5 pounds in excess or in deficiency on any individual barrel: *Provided, however,* That the average error on 10 barrels of the same nominal weight and packed by the same manufacturer shall in no case be greater than 2 pounds in excess or in deficiency. In case all the barrels available are not weighed, those which are weighed shall be selected at random.

(b) When lime is packed in containers of less capacity than the standard small barrel, the tolerance to be allowed in excess or in deficiency on individual containers of various weights, shall be the values given in the column headed “Tolerance on individual package,” of the following table: *Provided, however,* That the average error on 10 containers of the same nominal weight and packed by the same manufacturer shall in no case be greater than the values given in the column headed “Tolerance on average weight,” of the following table. In case all the containers available are not weighed, those which are weighed shall be selected at random.

| Weight of packaged | Tolerance on individual package (pounds) | Tolerance on average weight (pounds) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Not greater than 50 lbs | 11/2 | 5/8 |
| More than 50 lb. and not greater than 100 lbs | 2 | 3/4 |
| More than 100 lb. and not greater than 150 lb | 3 | 11/4 |
| More than 150 lb. and less than 180 lb | 4 | 11/2 |

(c) When lime in bulk is sold, charged for, or purported to be delivered as a definite number of large or small barrels, the tolerance to be allowed in excess or in deficiency on such amounts of lime shall be 15 pounds per 1,800 pounds (10 small barrels), or 25 pounds per 2,800 pounds (10 large barrels).
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 30, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 69664]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26294]



[[Page 69664]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 4892]


Renewal of the Overseas Schools Advisory Council

    The Department of State is renewing the Overseas Schools Advisory 
Council to provide a formal channel for regular consultation and advice 
from U.S. corporations and foundations regarding American-sponsored 
overseas schools. The Under Secretary for Management has determined 
that the committee is necessary and in the public interest.
    The Assistant Secretary for Administration will appoint the members 
of the committee. The committee will follow the procedures prescribed 
by the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). Meetings will be open to 
the public unless a determination is made in accordance with the FACA 
Section 10(d) and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (1) and (4) that a meeting or a 
portion of the meeting should be closed to the public. Notice of each 
meeting will be provided in the Federal Register at least 15 days prior 
to the meeting date.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Keith D. Miller, Executive 
Secretary of the committee at 202-261-8200.

    Dated: November 15, 2004.
Keith D. Miller,
Executive Secretary, Overseas Schools Advisory Council, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 04-26294 Filed 11-29-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-24-P
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 DORIAN E. RAMIREZ

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

May 26, 2015

Hon. Thomas J. Burbank

Attorney at Law

2 Acadiana Court

Beaumont, TX 77706

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Wayln G. Thompson

Asst. District Attorney

Jefferson County

1001 Pearl Street, 3rd Floor

Beaumont, TX 77701

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13-14-00192-CR

Tr.Ct.No. 11-12939

Style: John Michael Weatherly aka Loco v. The State of Texas

The above-referenced cause has been set for submission without oral argument 

on Tuesday, June 16, 2015, before a panel consisting of Chief Justice Rogelio Valdez, 

Justice Gina M. Benavides and Justice Gregory T. Perkes. 

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER:ch
**EXHIBIT 31.1**CERTIFICATION     I, Phillip A. Harris, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Stratos International, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:       a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;        b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and        c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):       a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and        b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: July 29,2005         /s/ Phillip A. Harris   Phillip A. Harris   President and Chief Executive Officer  
90
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Salomon Smith Barney Orion Futures Fund L.P. (the‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-Q for the periodended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’),I, David J. Vogel, President and Director of Citigroup Managed FuturesLLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Partnership.

/s/    DavidJ. Vogel

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

David J.VogelCitigroup Managed Futures LLC President and Director

Date:    November 14,2006

----
§ 1112.17 How will the CPSC respond to each application? ( a ) The CPSC staff will review each application and may contact the third party conformity assessment body with questions or to request submission of missing information.
( b ) The application of a firewalled third party conformity assessment body will be accepted by order of the Commission, if the Commission finds that: ( 1 ) Acceptance of the accreditation of the third party conformity assessment body would provide equal or greater consumer safety protection than the manufacturer's or private labeler's use of an independent third party third party conformity assessment body; and
( 2 ) The third party conformity assessment body has established procedures to ensure that: ( i ) Its test results are protected from undue influence by the manufacturer, private labeler, or other interested party;
( ii ) The CPSC is notified immediately of any attempt by the manufacturer, private labeler, or other interested party to hide or exert undue influence over test results; and
( iii ) Allegations of undue influence may be reported confidentially to the CPSC.
( c ) The CPSC will communicate its decision on each application in writing to the applicant, which may be by electronic mail.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-4760

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MELVIN EUGENE GIBBS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. David A. Faber, Chief District Judge.

(CR-03-400-PJM)

Submitted: May 31, 2006 Decided: June 14, 2006

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Melvin Eugene Gibbs, Appellant Pro Se. James M. Trusty, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Melvin Eugene Gibbs pled guilty to one count of mailing

threatening communications, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 876 (West

Supp. 2005). Gibbs is an attorney and is proceeding pro se on

appeal. On appeal, Gibbs raises claims of whether it was proper

for the district court to recuse all District of Maryland judges

and appoint a Southern District of West Virginia judge; whether the

district court erred in ordering a competency hearing to determine

if Gibbs was competent to stand trial and serve as his own counsel;

whether the delay caused by the competency examination and hearing

resulted in a violation of the Speedy Trial Act; whether it was

error for the Government to use case files relating to Gibbs’ other

cases; whether Gibbs was forced to plead guilty by requiring a

competency hearing, denying him medical care in detention, and due

to unspecified risks to the lives of himself and his family based

on Gibbs’ prosecution of a civil case; whether the indictment

sufficiently charged specific intent to mail a threatening

communication; whether the prosecution for mailing a threatening

communication violated Gibbs’ First Amendment rights; whether the

district court erred in denying Gibbs bail; and whether ineffective

assistance of counsel caused Gibbs to plead guilty.

 We have reviewed Gibbs’ brief on appeal, the appendix

submitted by Gibbs, the Government’s letter in reply to Gibbs’

brief, and the record, which included transcripts of the relevant
- 3 -

proceedings. After a careful review of the claims asserted by

Gibbs on appeal and the record before us, we affirm Gibbs’

judgment. We grant Gibbs’ motion to file a reply brief, but deny

all his pending motions for expedited treatment and to stay his

conviction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
FORM 10-Q CERTIFICATION

I, Darwin L. Stump, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PDC 2002-A Limited Partnership;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

	(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 12, 2003
 /s/ Darwin L. Stump                                

Darwin L. Stump

Chief Financial Officer of Petroleum Development Corporation 

Managing General Partner of PDC 2002-A Limited Partnership
### **CHAPTER 3A—CANCER**
#### § 1205.2 Effective date.

This standard applies to all rotary walk behind power lawn mowers manufactured after June 30, 1982, except § 1205.6 *Warning labels,* applies to rotary and reel-type walk-behind power lawn mowers manufactured after December 31, 1979.

[44 FR 10024, Feb. 15, 1979, as amended 45 FR 86417, Dec. 31, 1980]
No:I-13-021 May 6, 2013

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330

Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331

Nuclear Gauge Reported Missing in West Virginia; Recovery is Sought

A Pennsylvania company has notified the Nuclear Regulatory Commission that a portable 

moisture-density gauge containing sealed sources of radioactive material is missing in West 

Virginia.

Valley Quarries Inc. of Chambersburg, Pa., reported that one of its employees was taking a 

reading with the Troxler Model 3430 gauge at a job site near Martinsburg, W.Va., last Friday 

morning. After completing the reading at about 10:40 a.m., the individual placed the gauge in the 

back of his pick-up truck and drove away, en route to another worksite.

Once he arrived, the gauge user realized the truck’s rear gate had opened and the device was 

missing. Further, the gauge was not in its shipping container. The gauge user and a co-worker 

promptly drove back along the route just traveled but were unable to find the device.

Subsequently, the company’s radiation safety officer stated that an employee of another firm 

reported seeing someone stop along the route to pick up and, then drive off with, what appeared to 

be the gauge.

The gauge contains approximately 8 millicuries of cesium-137 and 40 millicuries of 

americium-241. It is used to take measurements by projecting radiation from the two radioactive 

sources into the ground and then displaying the amount of radiation reflected back to the gauge.

There is a plunger-type handle protruding from the top of the gauge. This is used to extend 

and then retract a radioactive source from the shielded position. When not in use, the handle is 

normally locked, with the source in the retracted, safely shielded position. The rectangular base of 

the gauge is bright yellow.

As long as the sources are in the shielded position, the gauge would present no hazard to the 

public. However, any attempt to tamper with the radioactive sources in the device could subject the 

person trying to do so to be exposed to an unshielded radioactive source, which could result in 

potentially dangerous radiation exposure.
Page | 2

Anyone seeing the gauge should leave it alone and report its location to the NRC’s 

Operations Center at 301-816-5100. The center is staffed 24 hours a day and accepts collect calls.

Also, Valley Quarries is offering a reward for the return of the gauge. The amount has not 

been specified. The company’s radiation safety officer, John Englerth, can be reached at 717-729-

1804.

Valley Quarries is licensed to use nuclear gauges by Pennsylvania, which is an NRC 

Agreement State. That means the state oversees nuclear material license-holders within its borders. 

However, the company was performing the work in West Virginia, which is not an Agreement 

State, under a reciprocity agreement with the NRC. Therefore, this situation is under the NRC’s 

jurisdiction, though the agency is coordinating follow-up activities with Pennsylvania.

The West Virginia Radiological Health Program Office has been notified about the loss of 

the gauge.

A typical moisture-density gauge is shown above.
### SUBCHAPTER IV—FEDERAL COORDINATING COUNCIL FOR SCIENCE, ENGINEERING, AND TECHNOLOGY
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

December 16, 2010

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with Daimler

FROM: Angela Cullen, Mechanical Engineer

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0162

This memorandum documents a meeting held on Thursday, December 9, 2010 between Daimler,

DOT, and EPA and included the following individuals:

Daimler: Brian Burton, David Kayes, Donald Keski-Hynmila, Mark Groeneweg

DOT: Maurice Hicks, Greg Powell

EPA: Byron Bunker, Cle Jackson, Jay Smith, Arvon Mitcham, Julian Davis, Chuck 

Moulis, and Angela Cullen

The discussion focused on clarification of the proposed standards and credit programs for heavyduty engines and vehicles.