alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Mary E. Furnas, plaintiff in error, v. Nemaha County, defendant in error.

1. Practice-in Supreme Court. The only mode of reviewing in this court the judgment of inferior courts, and tribunals exercising judicial power, in civil cases, is by appeal or petition in error.

2. -. This court will not review a decision of the county commissioners, made while acting as a board of equalization, on an agreed statement of facts, when none of the statutory steps have been taken to bring the case here.

This case came up upon an agreed statement of facts from Nemaha county.

*Robert E.*Furnas, appeared in behalf of plaintiff.

*W. T. Rogers,*for the defendant.

Lake, Ch. J.

It is sought by this proceeding to have a review in this court of a decision of the board of equalization of Nemaha county, whereby certain lands of Mary E. Furnas were, as it is claimed, erroneously entered, and returned upon the tax duplicate for taxation.

The whole subject is presented to this court, as it was also to the district court, upon an agreed statement of facts, and the question first to be determined is whether we will exercise jurisdiction of a matter thus informally brought to our notice.

The statute points out distinctly the course to be pursued *“*to reverse, vacate or modify judgments and orders in courts of appellate jurisdiction,” which, except where an appeal is given, “ shall be by petition, to be entitled petition in error, filed in a court having power to make such reversal, vacation or modification, setting forthi the *368errors complained of,” etc. Séc. 584, Code of Civil Procedure.

Waiving entirely the question of our jurisdiction to review the decisions of an inferior tribunal in this informal manner, which has not been raised by the parties, still we are of opinion that the recognition of so loose a practice would lead to infinite mischief, and therefore should be discountenanced.

This court does not sit in the character of a hoard of arbitration to decide upon the validity of the judgment of other courts, but to adjudge, under the forms of the law, whether errors have been committed prejudicial to the party complaining, the same being brought distinctly to our notice.

For these reasons the case must he dismissed.

Case dismissed.
§ 946.1 Purpose. ( a ) This part sets forth the procedures for certification by the Secretary of Commerce that the closure, consolidation, automation or relocation of any field office of the National Weather Service (NWS) pursuant to the implementation of the Strategic Plan for the Modernization of the NWS will not result in any degradation of weather services. Section 706 of Pub. L. 102-567 requires that no such field office be closed, consolidated, automated, or relocated until such certification is made. This part distinguishes these modernization activities which require certification from those changes in operations at a field office which do not require certification.
( b ) This part, including specifically these sections which specify when certifications are required, is intended to promote confidence that public safety is being adequately considered during the modernization process. While some of the terms used in these regulations may be identical to those used by the Office of Personnel Management, the General Services Administration, or by NOAA in personnel regulations, this part does not affect or supersede those regulations. In particular, a determination that the move of a field office is not a “relocation” for purposes of these regulations does not affect an employee's rights to relocation assistance, discontinued service retirement, severance pay, or grade and pay retention.
---

---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Acro Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), we, Gadi Aner, President, Chief Executive Officer and
Director of the Company, and Gabby Klausner, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge, that:

| | (1) | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)           of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | By: /s/ Gadi AnerGadi AnerPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | By: /s/ Gabby KlausnerGabby KlausnerTreasurer and Chief Financial Officer
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 12, 2008



---

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ProUroCareMedical Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Richard C. Carlson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, RichardB. Thon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of ourknowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, that:

 

(1)           the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperation of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Richard C. Carlson  |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Richard C. Carlson      |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |
| August 14, 2008    |   |
|                    |   |
|                    |   |
| /s/ Richard. B. Thon    |   |
| Richard B. Thon         |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |
| August 14, 2008    |   |

 

----
April 6 , 2016

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Request to Amend Section 333 Exemption No. 14485 , dated January 14, 2016 , Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 5026

.

Dear Sir or Madam:

Westar Energy, Inc. ("Westar Energy") petitions to amend its small Unmanned Aerial Systems (sUAS) Section 333 Exemption (No. 14485 ) t o include the following language as approved in Exemption 15537, dated March 15, 2016 , Docket No

. FAA

– 2015

– 6191

.
"The operator is authorized by this grant of exemption to use any aircraft identified on the List of Approved UAS under Section 333 at regulatory docket FAA

- 2007

- 3330 at www.regulations.gov, when weighing less th an 55 pounds including payload. "

The above listed aircraft will be operated under the same terms and conditions set forth in the approved exemption. All operations of listed aircraft will be in full compliance with the terms of the exemption.

Best Regards,

/S/ Jason Klenklen

Jason Klenklen

Supervisor, Transmission Maintenance

818 S. Kansas Avenue PO Box 889 Topeka, KS 66601 Ph: 785

- 575

- 8187 Email: Jason.klenklen@westarenergy.com
Editorial Note on Part 400
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 400 appear at 78 FR 69289, Nov. 19, 2013.

§ 400.51 Records and reports. ( a ) *Records and forms.* Zone records and forms shall be prepared and maintained in accordance with the requirements of CBP and the Board, consistent with documents issued by the Board specific to the zone in question, and the zone grantee shall retain copies of applications/requests it submits to the Board in electronic or paper format.
( b ) *Maps and drawings.* Zone grantees or operators, and CBP, shall keep current layout drawings of approved sites as described in § 400.21(d)(5), showing activated portions, and a file showing required activation approvals. The zone grantee shall furnish necessary maps to CBP.
( c ) *Annual reports.* ( 1 ) Each zone grantee shall submit a complete and accurate annual report to the Board within 90 days after the end of the reporting period. Each zone operator shall submit a complete and accurate annual report to the zone grantee in a timeframe that will enable the grantee's timely submission of a complete and accurate annual report to the Board. A zone grantee may request an extension of the deadline for its report, as warranted. The Executive Secretary may authorize such extensions, with decisions on such authorizations taking into account both the circumstances presented and the importance of the Board submitting its annual report to Congress in a timely manner. Annual reports must be submitted in accordance with any instructions, guidelines, forms and related documents specifying place, manner and format(s) prescribed by the Executive Secretary. In the event that a grantee has not received all necessary annual report information from an operator in a timely manner, the grantee may submit its annual report on time and note the absence of the missing information.
( 2 ) The Board shall submit an annual report to Congress.
#### § 930.10 Index to definitions for terms defined in part 930.

| Term | Section |
| --- | --- |
| Act | 930.11(a) |
| Any coastal use or resource | 930.11(b) |
| Appellant | 930.123 |
| Applicant | 930.52 |
| Applicant agency | 930.92 |
| Assistant Administrator | 930.11(c) |
| Associated facilities | 930.11(d) |
| Coastal zone | 930.11(e) |
| Consistent to the maximum extent practicable | 930.32 |
| Consistent with the objectives or purposes of the Act | 930.121 |
| Development project | 930.31(b) |
| Director | 930.11(f) |
| Effect on any coastal use or resource | 930.11(g) |
| Enforceable policy | 930.11(h) |
| Executive Office of the President | 930.11(i) |
| Failure substantially to comply with an OCS plan | 930.85(c) |
| Federal agency | 930.11(j) |
| Federal agency activity | 930.31 |
| Federal assistance | 930.91 |
| Federal license or permit | 930.51 |
| Federal license or permit activity described in detail | 930.71 |
| Interstate coastal effect | 930.151 |
| Major amendment | 930.51(c) |
| Management program | 930.11(k) |
| Necessary in the interest of national security | 930.122 |
| OCS plan | 930.73 |
| OCRM | 930.11(l) |
| Person | 930.72 |
| Secretary | 930.11(m) |
| Section | 930.11(n) |
| State agency | 930.11(o) |

[65 FR 77154, Dec. 8, 2000, as amended at 71 FR 826, Jan. 5, 2006]
**EXHIBIT 10.2**

Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. has entered into an agreement with each of the following persons, which is substantially identical, except as set forth below, to the form of Employment Agreement filed asExhibit 10.9 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 3, 2008: 

Najabat H.Bajwa 

Raouf Y. Halim 

Gerald J. Hamilton 

The multiple set forth in Section 6(i)(B) of theEmployment Agreement for Mr. Halim is three and the multiple set forth in Section 6(i)(B) of the Employment Agreement for the other persons is two.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3488 

To prohibit foreign assistance to countries with a gross domestic product 

of $1,500,000,000,000 or more. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2011 

Mr. BUCSHON (for himself and Mr. LANDRY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit foreign assistance to countries with a gross 

domestic product of $1,500,000,000,000 or more. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Invest in America First 

5 Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON FOREIGN ASSISTANCE TO COUN7 TRIES WITH A GDP OF $1,500,000,000,000 OR 

8 MORE. 

9 (a) PROHIBITION.— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3488 IH

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para2 graph (2), assistance may not provided under any 

3 provision of law to a country with a GDP of 

4 $1,500,000,000,000 or more. 

5 (2) EXCEPTION.—The prohibition on assistance 

6 under paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect to 

7 military assistance, security assistance, or humani8 tarian assistance. 

9 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this Act— 

10 (1) the term ‘‘GDP’’ means, with respect to a 

11 country, the gross domestic product of the country 

12 on a purchasing power parity (PPP) basis divided by 

13 the population of the country, as determined by the 

14 most recent publication of the Central Intelligence 

15 Agency’s The World Factbook; and 

16 (2) the term ‘‘humanitarian assistance’’— 

17 (A) means assistance, provided on such 

18 terms and conditions as the President may de19 termine, for the relief and rehabilitation of vic20 tims of natural and manmade disasters, includ21 ing food, water, medicine, clothing, and shelter; 

22 and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3488 IH

1 (B) does not include direct financial assist2 ance for the purposes described in subpara3 graph (A). 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
No: 14-084 December 1, 2014

CONTACT: Maureen Conley, 301-415-8200 

NRC Seeks Comment on Draft Policy Statement, Tribal Manual

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is asking for public comments on two draft documents

intended to encourage and facilitate involvement by Native American tribes in areas of NRC 

jurisdiction. The proposed Tribal Policy Statement and draft guidance to the staff on interacting with 

federally-recognized tribes are the next steps in the agency’s effort to formalize the process for 

engaging with tribal governments. The NRC published Federal Register notices outlining the 

documents Dec. 1 and asking for comments by March 31, 2015.

The NRC produced the draft policy statement and manual in response to direction from the 

Commission in January 2012 following an increase in the number and complexity of consultations 

between the NRC and Native American tribes. The drafts are based on input the NRC received after 

publishing later that year the first draft of a Tribal Protocol Manual outlining staff guidance for 

consulting with tribal governments. At that time, the NRC also asked for input on how to strengthen 

government-to-government relationships and make them most effective.

More information on the NRC’s interactions with tribes can be found on the agency’s website.
#### § 1611.3 Flammability—general requirement.

The rate of burning shall not exceed 1.2 in./sec as judged by the average of five determinations lengthwise and five determinations transverse to the direction of processing, when the material is tested with the SPI flammability tester in accordance with the method described in § 1611.4.
§ 254.0 Scope and application. ( a ) The Guides in this part apply to persons, firms, corporations, or organizations engaged in the operation of privately owned schools that offer resident or distance courses, training, or instruction purporting to prepare or qualify individuals for employment in any occupation or trade, or in work requiring mechanical, technical, artistic, business, or clerical skills, or that is for the purpose of enabling a person to improve his appearance, social aptitude, personality, or other attributes. These Guides do not apply to resident primary or secondary schools or institutions of higher education offering at least a 2-year program of accredited college level studies generally acceptable for credit toward a bachelor's degree.
( b ) These Guides represent administrative interpretations of laws administered by the Federal Trade Commission for the guidance of the public in conducting its affairs in conformity with legal requirements. These Guides specifically address the application of section 5 of the FTC Act (15 U.S.C. 45) to the advertising, promotion, marketing, and sale of, and the recruitment of students for, courses or programs of instruction offered by private vocational or distance education schools. The Guides provide the basis for voluntary compliance with the law by members of the industry. Practices inconsistent with these Guides may result in corrective action by the Commission under section 5 of the FTC Act if, after investigation, the Commission has reason to believe that the practices fall within the scope of conduct declared unlawful by the statute.
[63 FR 42572, Aug. 10, 1998, as amended at 78 FR 68989, Nov. 18, 2013]
### §11801. Establishment of drug abuse education and prevention program relating to youth gangs

The Secretary of Health and Human Services, through the Administration on Children, Youth, and Families, shall make grants to, and enter into contracts with, public and nonprofit private agencies (including agencies described in paragraph (7)(A) acting jointly), organizations (including community based organizations with demonstrated experience in this field), institutions, and individuals, to carry out projects and activities—

(1) to prevent and to reduce the participation of youth in the activities of gangs that engage in illicit drug-related activities,

(2) to promote the involvement of youth in lawful activities in communities in which such gangs commit drug-related crimes,

(3) to prevent the abuse of drugs by youth, to educate youth about such abuse, and to refer for treatment and rehabilitation members of such gangs who abuse drugs,

(4) to support activities of local police departments and other local law enforcement agencies to conduct educational outreach activities in communities in which gangs commit drug-related crimes,

(5) to inform gang members and their families of the availability of treatment and rehabilitation services for drug abuse,

(6) to facilitate Federal and State cooperation with local school officials to assist youth who are likely to participate in gangs that commit drug-related crimes,

(7) to facilitate coordination and cooperation among—

(A) local education, juvenile justice, employment and social service agencies, and

(B) drug abuse referral, treatment, and rehabilitation programs,

for the purpose of preventing or reducing the participation of youth in activities of gangs that commit drug-related crimes, and

(8) to provide technical assistance to eligible organizations in planning and implementing drug abuse education, prevention, rehabilitation, and referral programs for youth who are members of gangs that commit drug-related crimes.

(Pub. L. 100–690, title III, §3501, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4254; Pub. L. 102–132, §1(a), Oct. 18, 1991, 105 Stat. 630.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–132 inserted "(including agencies described in paragraph (7)(A) acting jointly)" after "agencies" in introductory provisions.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1991 Amendment

Pub. L. 102–132, §3, Oct. 18, 1991, 105 Stat. 631, provided that: "This Act [enacting section 11806 of this title and amending this section and sections 11805 and 11823 of this title] shall take effect on October 1, 1991."
### SUBCHAPTER IV—MENTAL HEALTH RIGHTS AND ADVOCACY
#### § 255.6 Endorsements directed to children.

Endorsements in advertisements addressed to children may be of special concern because of the character of the audience. Practices that would not ordinarily be questioned in advertisements addressed to adults might be questioned in such cases.
#### § 1502.2 Computation of time periods.

Whenever a time period for taking action is specified by these procedures, by the presiding officer, or by the Commission, Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal holidays are included in computing time. However, if the last day for taking such action falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the action shall be timely if taken on or before the next Federal Government business day.
----

EXHIBIT 32.1 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 
In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form10-Q of Colombia Goldfields Ltd. for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, I certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that: 
(1) 

the quarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of Colombia Goldfields Ltd. for the quarter ended June 30,2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
(2) 

the informationcontained in the quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2008, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Colombia Goldfields Ltd..
By: /s/ J. Randall Martin                                       Name: J. Randall Martin Title: Chief Executive Officer and Vice Chairman Date: August 8, 2008
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 11

- 00456

- CV

JACKIE RUSSELL KEETE R , Appellant

v.

SANDY GATELY , Appellee

From the 52nd District Court Coryell County, Texas Trial Court No. COT

- 11

- 40758

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Jackie Russell Keeter appeals from the trial court’s denial of his “Petition to Take
Deposition to Investigate Potential Claim.” See T EX

. R. C IV

. P . 202. In his brief filed on
May 18, 2012, Keeter admitted that he was “well aware, that the denial of the taking of a
deposition, is en forceable by mandamus only.”
By letter dated July 20, 2012, the Clerk of this Court notified Keeter that pursuant
to Rules 42.3 and 44.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, this case was subject to
dismissal because it appeared the order which was the subject of the appeal wasKeeter v. Gately Page 2

interlocutory and not appealable. See I n re Jorden , 249 S.W.3d 416, 419 (Tex. 2008)
(“Presuit deposition orders are appealable only if sought from someone against whom
suit is not anticipated; when sought from an anticipated defendant (as here), such
orders have been considered ancillary to the subsequent suit, and thus neither final nor
appealable.”). The Clerk further warned Keeter that the Court would dismiss this
appeal unless, within 21 days from the date of the letter, a response was filed showing
grounds for continuing the appeal. More than 21 days have passed and no response

has been received.
This appeal is dismissed. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.3(a); 44.3.

TOM GRAY Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed August 23, 2012 [CV06]
### Part A—Improved Privacy Provisions and Security Provisions