alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 260.11 Ozone-safe and ozone-friendly claims.

It is deceptive to misrepresent, directly or by implication, that a product, package, or service is safe for, or friendly to, the ozone layer or the atmosphere.

# Example 1:

A product is labeled “ozone-friendly.” The claim is deceptive if the product contains any ozone-depleting substance, including those substances listed as Class I or Class II chemicals in Title VI of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, Public Law. 101-549, and others subsequently designated by EPA as ozone-depleting substances. These chemicals include chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), halons, carbon tetrachloride, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, methyl bromide, hydrobromofluorocarbons, and hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs).

# Example 2:

An aerosol air freshener is labeled “ozone-friendly.” Some of the product's ingredients are volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that may cause smog by contributing to ground-level ozone formation. The claim likely conveys that the product is safe for the atmosphere as a whole, and, therefore, is deceptive.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

CAROLYN DUTRIZ,

Appellant,

v.

NICOLA NAZY and RITA NAZY,

Appellees.

No. 4D21-1646

[March 31, 2022]

Appeal of a nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth 

Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; John S. Kastrenakes, Judge; L.T. 

Case No. 502021CA002690.

Enrique Nieves III of Enrique Nieves, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens, for 

appellant.

David Steinfeld of Law Office of David Steinfeld, Palm Beach Gardens, 

for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, GERBER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 31.1

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        I, Terry J. Heimes, certify that:

        1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Nelnet
Education Loan Funding, Inc. (the "Company");

        2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

        3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

        4. The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

             (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Company is made known to us by
others, particularly during the period in which the quarterly report is being
prepared;

             (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

             (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;
and

        5. The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Company's auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

             (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process,
summarize, and report financial information; and

             (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


    Date:  November 15, 2004            /s/ Terry J. Heimes
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Terry J. Heimes
                                        President (Principal Executive Officer)
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 97-1452WM

_____________

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; *

*

Plaintiff, *

*

PSB Credit Services, Inc., * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Western

Plaintiff-Appellant, * District of Missouri.

*

v. * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Robert Cotitta; Hazel M. Blanchard, *

*

Defendants-Appellees. *

_____________

 Submitted: September 12, 1997

Filed: September 18, 1997

_____________

Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

PSB Credit Services, Inc. appeals the district court's summary judgment rulings

in favor of Robert Cotitta on Counts I and II of the complaint. Having thoroughly

reviewed the record and the parties' submissions, we affirm for the reasons given in the

district court's opinion. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
## Digital recovery, modification, and analysis of Tetra Tech seismic horizon mapping, National Petroleum Reserve Alaska (NPRA), northern Alaska

*By***R.W. Saltus, C.S. Kulander, *and* C.J. Potter**
**U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 02-111**

**Version 1.0**

We have digitized, modified, and analyzed seismic interpretation maps of 12 subsurface stratigraphic horizons spanning portions of the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska (NPRA). These original maps were prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc., based on about 15,000 miles of seismic data collected from 1974 to 1981. We have also digitized interpreted faults and seismic velocities from Tetra Tech maps. The seismic surfaces were digitized as two-way travel time horizons and converted to depth using Tetra Tech seismic velocities. The depth surfaces were then modified by long-wavelength corrections based on recent USGS seismic re-interpretation along regional seismic lines. We have developed and executed an algorithm to identify and calculate statistics on the area, volume, height, and depth of closed structures based on these seismic horizons. These closure statistics are tabulated and have been used as input to oil and gas assessment calculations for the region. Directories accompanying this report contain basic digitized data, processed data, maps, tabulations of closure statistics, and software relating to this project. 
OFR-02-111.pdf      OFR-02-111 PDF file (5.48 MB)(This version of the report is accessible as defined in Section 508.)Data    This directory contains ASCII data files for the basic digitized data and for the final seismic horizon grids.Maps    This directory contains PDF formatted maps of the seismic horizons, time differences, and closure analyses.Software    This directory contains the FORTRAN 77 source code for the three custom software codes developed for identification and measurement of closed structures on the seismic horizons.Spreadsheets    This directory contains Microsoft Excel spreadsheets containing tables of closure statistics and summary statistics from the closure analyses.StatsThis directory contains ASCII formatted printouts that detail the statistics of closure area verses height for the different horizons that were studied.AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices
U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey      URL: https://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/of/2002/ofr-02-111/Questions or Assistance: USGS Web ContactPage Last Modified: Wed Dec  7 19:15 EDT 2016
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# Summary Of September 22-23, 2014 Meeting With The Nuclear Energy Institute And Stakeholders To Discuss Fuel Cycle Regulatory Activities And The Cumulative Effects Of Regulation.

Accession Number: ML14280A256

Date Released: Wednesday, October 22, 2014

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML14280A245 - 09/22-23/2014 Summery Meeting with The Nuclear Energy Institute And Stakeholders To Discuss Fuel Cycle Regulatory Activities And The Cumulative Effects Of Regulation. (2 page(s), 10/14/2014)
    - ML14280A249 - Enclosure 1: Slide Presentation for the September 22-23, 2014 Fuel Cycle Regulatory Activities and CER. (75 page(s), 10/20/2014)
    - ML14280A253 - Enclosure 2: Attendees Sheet for the September 22-23, 2014 Fuel Cycle Regulatory Activities and CER. (4 page(s), 9/22/2014)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
§ 1301.5 Banning criteria. ( a ) Any refuse bin of metal construction produced or distributed, for sale to, or for the personal use, consumption or enjoyment of consumers, in or around a permanent or temporary household or residence, a school, in recreation or otherwise, which is in commerce or being distributed in commerce on or after the effective date of this ban and which has an actual internal volume one cubic yard or greater and tips over when tested under the conditions of § 1301.6 and using the procedures described in § 1301.7, is a banned hazardous product.
( b ) The Commission considers a refuse bin to tip over when it begins to rotate forward about its forwardmost ground supports.
Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance



 




EXHIBIT 10.110




AMENDMENT TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




This Amendment (the “Amendment”) is entered into by and between StarTek, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”) and Mr. A. Laurence Jones, a resident of Colorado (the “Executive”).



RECITALS




A. The Company and the Executive entered into that certain Employment Agreement effective as
of January 5, 2007 (the “Agreement”) setting forth the terms and conditions of the Executive’s
employment by the Company.




B. The parties wish to amend the Agreement.



AGREEMENT




Now, therefore, for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:



1. The last sentence of Section 4(e), which begins “To the extent permitted . . .,” is
deleted in its entirety, and replaced by the following:




“To the extent permitted by the Company’s group health plan, Executive may at his option
waive coverage for himself and his dependents under the Company’s group health plan. If
Executive elects to waive coverage, then:




"(a) He may do so during the period of time permitted for his enrollment for
benefits upon his being hired and/or during subsequent open enrollment periods,
and




"(b) The Company will pay Executive an amount equal to the Company’s share of the
costs for the coverage that he waives, less applicable taxes and withholdings, at
the same time he receives his normal payments of salary.”




2. No other changes to the Agreement are made by this Amendment.



In witness whereof, Executive and the Company have executed this Amendment as of the date the
last party signs below.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	StarTek, Inc.	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By

	 	/s/ Albert C. Yates
	 	6/20/07
	 	A. L. Jones
	 	7/09/07
	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Albert C. Yates
	 	(Date)
	 	A. Laurence Jones
	 	(Date)
	 	 	Chairman of the Compensation	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Committee of the Board of Directors
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Leach, Appellant.

[820 NYS2d 920]

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s motion to be relieved of assignment granted *(see People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38 [1979]). (Appeal from Judgment of Wyoming County Court, Mark H. Dadd, J.— Attempted Criminal Sexual Act, 1st Degree). Present — Pigott, Jr., PJ., Kehoe, Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.
Unassociated Document


     

    
      Exhibit
        10.2 - Form of Allonge to Promissory Note

      


      


      ALLONGE
        TO PROMISSORY NOTE

      


      This
        Allonge is made effective this 31st
        day of
        July, 2007, to the Promissory Note dated August 7, 2006, made by Adera Mines
        Limited, now named Chatsworth Data Solutions, Inc. (the “Maker”) in favor of
        _________(the “Lender”).

      


      WHEREAS,
        the Maker has executed and delivered to the Lender that certain Promissory
        Note
        dated August 7, 2006, in the original principal amount of (collectively
        $2,000,000)
        (the
“Note”).

      


      NOW,
        THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
        of
        which are hereby acknowledged, the Maker and the Lender hereby agree as
        follows:

      


      1. Paragraph
        3 of the Note is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as
        follows:

      


      "Periodic
        Payments.
        Interest accrued hereunder shall be paid quarterly, in arrears, on the first
        day
        of the calendar month immediately following the end of each fiscal quarter,
        the
        first such payment being due on October 1, 2006. Principal shall be paid
        as
        follows: (i) (collectively
        $250,000)
        shall be
        due and payable on the first anniversary of the issuance of this Note (August
        6,
        2007), (ii) (collectively
        $250,000)
        shall be
        due and payable on December 31, 2007, (iii) (collectively
        $500,000)
        shall be
        due and payable on March 31, 2008 and (iv) (collectively
        $1,000,000)
        shall be
        due and payable on the second anniversary of the issuance of this Note (August
        6, 2008). Any accrued but unpaid interest and any unpaid principal shall
        be due
        in full on the Maturity Date."

      


      2. Any
        capitalized terms used herein and not defined herein shall have the meaning
        assigned to them in the Note. Except as specifically amended hereby, the
        Note
        remains in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.

      

        IN
          WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have duly executed this Allonge to the
          Note as
          of the date first written above.

         

        
          	 	
                  MAKER: 

                  Chatsworth
                    Data Solutions, Inc.

                   

                  By:
                    ______________________________

                  Name:

                  Title::

                   

                  LENDER:

                  _________________________________
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3534 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3534

 To amend title 31, United States Code, to revise requirements related 
         to assets pledged by a surety, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 1, 2011

Mr. Hanna (for himself and Mr. Mulvaney) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 31, United States Code, to revise requirements related 
         to assets pledged by a surety, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Security in Bonding Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. SURETY BOND REQUIREMENTS.

    Chapter 93 of subtitle VI of title 31, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in section 9304(b)--
                    (A) by striking ``may not require'' and inserting 
                ``may require''; and
                    (B) by striking ``or through'' and inserting ``, 
                but not through'';
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 9310. Individual sureties
    ``If another applicable law or regulation permits the acceptance of 
a bond from a surety that is not subject to sections 9305 and 9306 and 
is based on a pledge of assets by the surety, the assets pledged by 
such surety shall--
            ``(1) consist of eligible obligations described under 
        section 9303(a); and
            ``(2) be submitted to the official of the Government 
        required to approve or accept the bond, who shall deposit the 
        assets with a depository described under section 9303(b).''; 
        and
            (3) in the table of contents for such chapter, by adding at 
        the end the following:

``9310. Individual sureties.''.
                                 <all>
```
No: 15-002 January 6, 2015

CONTACT: Stephanie West, 301-415-8200 

 

Registration Opens for NRC’s 2015 Regulatory Information Conference

Registration is now open for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s 27th annual Regulatory 

Information Conference (RIC). The RIC is being held on March 10-12 at the Bethesda North Marriott, 

5701 Marinelli Road, Bethesda, Md. 

The NRC’s offices of Nuclear Reactor Regulation and Nuclear Regulatory Research jointly host 

the RIC. The conference is free and open to the public, but registration is required. The agenda and 

online registration are now available on the NRC website. The deadline for online registration is 

Feb. 24.

Nearly 3,000 people are expected to attend, including industry executives, representatives from 

state governments, non-governmental organizations, individual community members, and 

representatives from dozens of foreign countries. The conference is an opportunity for attendees to 

discuss issues related to the safety and security of commercial nuclear facilities and current regulatory 

activities. 

The program features Chairman Stephen G. Burns as the keynote speaker. Additional program 

highlights include plenary sessions with Commissioners Kristine L. Svinicki, William C. Ostendorff 

and Jeff Baran. NRC’s executive director for operations, Mark Satorius, will give remarks, and Bill 

Dean, director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, will give welcome and introductory 

remarks. 

This year’s RIC includes two sessions expected to be particularly highly attended: 

Implementation of Lessons Learned from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident (an international panel 

discussion), and Regulatory Agility in the New Millennium. Other technical sessions will address 

significant domestic and international issues associated with nuclear safety and security, reactor 

decommissioning, public participation in the regulatory process, spent fuel storage and new reactor 

licensing.

Early registration is encouraged; however, onsite registration will also be available during the 

conference.
### Part C—Residential Energy Efficiency Programs
EXHIBIT 32
----------




          CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
          --------------------------------------------------


     The following statement is provided by the undersigned with respect
to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2007, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall
not be deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 or any other securities law:

     Each of the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on
Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of KAANAPALI LAND, LLC.




    By: /s/  Gary Nickele               By: /s/  Gailen J. Hull
        ---------------------------         ---------------------------
        Gary Nickele                        Gailen J. Hull
        Chief Executive Officer             Chief Financial Officer and
                                            Chief Accounting Officer
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3517 

To amend the Passport Act of 1920 to waive the collection of passport 

fees to replace passports that were lost, damaged, or destroyed as a 

result of major disasters or emergencies. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 29, 2011 

Mr. OWENS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Passport Act of 1920 to waive the collection 

of passport fees to replace passports that were lost, damaged, or destroyed as a result of major disasters or 

emergencies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Passport Recovery As5 sistance Act of 2011’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3517 IH

1 SEC. 2. WAIVER OF PASSPORT FEES RELATING TO EX2 TREME WEATHER EVENTS. 

3 Subsection (a) of section 1 of the Passport Act of 

4 1920 (22 U.S.C. 214) is amended by inserting before the 

5 last sentence the following new sentence: ‘‘No passport fee 

6 shall be collected from an individual to replace an unex7 pired passport that was lost, damaged, or destroyed as a 

8 result of an event that resulted in the President declaring, 

9 pursuant to section 401 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 

10 Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170), 

11 that a major disaster or emergency exists relating to such 

12 event.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
---

---

Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of ACRO Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Gadi Aner, the Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

|(1) | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | By: /s/ Gadi AnerGadi AnerChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 11, 2008



---

---