alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
September 5, 2013 

The Honorable Darrell Issa 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, D.C. 20515 

Dear Congressman Issa: 

 On behalf of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), I am responding to your 

letter of July 19, 2013, in which you urge the agency to review the regulatory process employed 

during recent activities at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) and determine 

how the regulatory system can be more fluid, transparent, and efficient. 

 The Commission agrees that the recent experience with SONGS provides an important 

opportunity and evaluating lessons learned is an approach regularly used by the NRC to identify 

improvements, including potential enhancements to the agency’s regulatory processes. 

Consistent with this practice, the agency plans to perform a lessons learned review of the staff’s 

oversight of the SONGS steam generator replacement project and associated proposed restart 

activities. While the scope and timing of this review are still under development, it is expected 

to begin this fall. 

Our approach as a continuous learning organization has been critical to our success in 

protecting public health and safety. The agency also adheres to a set of Principles of Good 

Regulation that focus on ensuring safety and security while appropriately balancing the interests 

of those affected by the NRC’s actions, including the public and the licensees. In applying these 

principles, the agency strives to develop and implement regulations that are coherent, logical, 

and practical, and informed by all available facts and opinions. 

 We will continue to update you on the NRC’s work related to SONGS. If you have any 

questions, please do not hesitate to contact me or Rebecca Schmidt, Director of the Office of 

Congressional Affairs, at (301) 415-1776. 

Sincerely, 

 /RA/ 

 

Allison M. Macfarlane 

 
Identical letter sent to:

The Honorable Darrell Issa 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, D.C. 20515 

The Honorable Devin Nunes 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, D.C. 20515 

The Honorable Tom McClintock 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, D.C. 20515 

The Honorable Doug LaMalfa 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, D.C. 20515 

The Honorable Ken Calvert 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, D.C. 20515 

The Honorable Kevin McCarthy 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, D.C. 20515
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. 2004N-0204]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “Patent Term Restoration, Due Diligence Petitions, Filing, Format, and Content of Petitions” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Karen Nelson, Office of Management Programs (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD  20857, 301-827-1482.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of August 19, 2004 (69 FR 51468), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507.  An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0233.  The approval expires on November 30, 2007.  A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at                     *http://www.fda.gov/​ohrms/​dockets*.                

Dated: November 19, 2004.

Jeffrey Shuren,

Assistant Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-26270 Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. 2004F-0455]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that Sterigenics International, Inc., has filed a petition proposing that the food additive regulations be amended to provide for the safe use of ionizing radiation in the production of shelf stable foods, including multiple ingredient shelf stable foods.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lane A. Highbarger, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-255), Food and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740-3835, 301-436-1204.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (sec. 409(b)(5) (21 U.S.C. 348(b)(5))), notice is given that a food additive petition (FAP 3M4744) has been filed by Sterigenics International, Inc., P.O. Box 17349, Memphis, TN 31817-0349.  The petition proposes that the food additive regulations in part 179                     *Irradiation in the Production, Processing and Handling of Food*                     (21 CFR 179) be amended to provide for the safe use of ionizing radiation in the production of fully cooked shelf stable foods, including fully cooked multiple ingredient shelf stable foods, where the absorbed dose required to cause a 12-log reduction in                     *Clostridium botulinum*                     has been established.                

The agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.32(j) that this action is of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.  Therefore, neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.

Dated: October 28, 2004.

Laura M. Tarantino,

Deputy Director, Office of Food Additive Safety, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition.

[FR Doc. 04-26334 Filed 11-29-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
§ 1209.34 Qualification testing. ( a ) *Requirement.* Before any manufacturer, importer, or private labeler begins distribution in commerce of cellulose insulation which is subject to the standard, samples of the insulation shall be tested for compliance with the standard. Manufacturers, importers, and private labelers shall determine the types of tests for qualification testing.
( b ) *Timing, Sampling.* Any or all of the qualification testing required by this § 1209.34 may be performed before the effective date of the standard. Manufacturers, private labelers, or importers may select samples for qualification testing of a product in any manner they desire.
### Part A—Prohibition Against Discrimination and Other Generally Applicable Provisions
DENIED and Opinion Filed June 1 , 2023

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05
- 23
- 00532
- CV IN RE KARLA D. STOVE R AND ROBERT J.S. TH OMPSON , Relators Original Proceeding from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 18
- 07079 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Pedersen, III, Nowell, and Miskel

Opinion by Justice Miskel Before the Court is relators’ May 31 , 2023 petition for writ of mandamus wherein relators seek relief from the trial court’s denial of their motion to stay. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relators to demonstrate that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that they lack an adequate remedy b y appeal.
In re Prudential Ins. Co

. of Am. , 148 S.W.3d 124, 135

– 36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).
A fter reviewing relator s ’ petition and the record before us, we conclude that
relator s have failed to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief. Accordingl y, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.– 2

–

We also deny relators’ motion for emergency stay of proceedings as moot.

230532f.p05 /Emily Miskel// EMILY MISKEL JUSTICE
§ 960.5 Application submission. ( a ) Before submitting an application, a person may consult informally with the Secretary to discuss matters under this part, including whether a license is likely to be required for a system.
( b ) A person may submit an application for a license in accordance with the specific instructions found in appendix B of this part. The application must contain fully accurate and responsive information, as described in appendix A of this part. Responses an applicant provides to each prompt in the application constitute material facts.
( c ) Within seven days of the submission, the Secretary shall determine, after consultation with the Secretaries of Defense and State, whether the submission is a complete application meeting the requirements of appendix A of this part. If the submission is a complete application, the Secretary shall immediately notify the applicant in writing. If the submission is not a complete application, the Secretary shall inform the applicant in writing of what additional information or clarification is required to complete the application.
( d ) If any information the applicant submitted becomes inaccurate or incomplete at any time after submission to the Secretary but before license grant or denial, the applicant must contact the Secretary and submit correct and updated information as instructed by the Secretary. The Secretary will determine whether the change is significant. If the Secretary determines that the change is significant, the Secretary will notify the applicant within seven days of receipt of the correct and updated information that the revision constitutes a new application submission under paragraph (b) of this section, and that the previous application is deemed to have been withdrawn.
( e ) Upon request by the applicant, the Secretary shall provide an update on the status of their application review.
Exhibit 32.1








REGENOCELL THERAPEUTICS, INC.


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANNES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of RegenoCELL Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”), I, James F. Mongiardo, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  October 28, 2011





/s/
James F. Mongiardo


James F. Mongiardo


Chief Executive Officer


and


Chief Financial Officer
### §11113. Payment of reasonable attorneys' fees and costs in defense of suit

In any suit brought against a defendant, to the extent that a defendant has met the standards set forth under section 11112(a) of this title and the defendant substantially prevails, the court shall, at the conclusion of the action, award to a substantially prevailing party defending against any such claim the cost of the suit attributable to such claim, including a reasonable attorney's fee, if the claim, or the claimant's conduct during the litigation of the claim, was frivolous, unreasonable, without foundation, or in bad faith. For the purposes of this section, a defendant shall not be considered to have substantially prevailed when the plaintiff obtains an award for damages or permanent injunctive or declaratory relief.

(Pub. L. 99–660, title IV, §413, Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3787.)
[Civil No. 287.

Filed January 29, 1891.]

[73 Pac. 443.]

#### A. J. DORAN, Administrator of the Estate of W. A. Robart, Deceased, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JOHN C. LOSE, Defendant and Appellant.

1. Appeal and Error—Jurisdiction—Motion eor New Trial—Failure to File in Time.—TMs court has no jurisdiction to reverse the judgment of the trial court, appellant not having his motion for a new trial disposed of at the term when the judgment was rendered and not having executed his bond on appeal within twenty days of the close of the term.

*2852. Same—Presumptions—End oe Term—Compare Putnam *v.*Putnam, ante, p. 182, 24 Pac. 321.—This court takes judicial notice of the fact that presumptively a term of court ends on the day prior to the beginning o'f a new term.

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Second Judicial District in and for the County; of Pinal. William W. Porter, Judge.

Affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

Baker & Campbell, for Appellant.

W. R. Stone, E. J. Edwards, and Barnes & Martin, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This action was to remove a cloud on the title of the appellee, as administrator of the estate of W. A. Robart, deceased, to a half interest in the Boomerang Mine, situate in Pinal County, Arizona. The case was tried below by the judge without the intervention of a jury.

The appellant, by his attorneys, presents with great force and ability legal objections to certain proceedings in the trial court, which it is urgently claimed should cause a reversal by this court of the judgment rendered in the case by the court below. We have read and considered the evidence, and, taking it all into consideration, have reached the conclusion that justice was done between the parties. If there are technical objections to parts of the proceedings, well taken at the time (which we do not decide), the record makes these objections unavailing to reverse what we consider a right and just judgment, for the record also discloses that the appellant did not have his motion for a new trial disposed of at the term of court when the judgment was rendered; nor did he execute bond for an appeal within twenty days of the close of the term. The judgment was rendered on the sixth day of February, 1889. The motion for a new trial was filed February 7, 1889. The court takes judicial knowledge of the fact that presumptively (the record not showing to the contrary) the term of court ended the day before the first Monday of April, 1889; that being the day of the beginning of a new term. (Compare *Putnam*v. *Putnam, ante,*p. 182, 24 Pac. 321.) The *286motion for a new trial was disposed of on the twelfth day of April, 1889. The bond on appeal was executed on the second day of May, 1889, and approved and filed on the twenty-second day of May, 1889. It is thus apparent that we have no jurisdiction to reverse the judgment rendered in the case by the trial court.

Sloan, J., took no part in the consideration of this case.
#### In the Matter of Lithuanian Building Corporation, Inc., Petitioner, against John F. O’Connell et al., Constituting the State Liquor Authority, et al., Respondents.

*915Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Van Voorhis, JJ.
§ 1018.22 Notice of meetings. ( a ) Meetings shall be called by written and/or oral notice to all members of the advisory committee.
( b ) Notice of each advisory committee meeting shall be published in the Federal Register as well as other means to give widespread public notice, at least 15 calendar days before the date of the meeting, except that shorter notice may be provided in emergency situations. Reasons for such emergency exceptions shall be made part of the meeting notice.
( c ) A meeting notice shall include: ( 1 ) The official designation of the committee;
( 2 ) The address and site of the meeting;
( 3 ) The time of the meeting;
( 4 ) The purpose of the meeting, including where appropriate, a summary of the agenda;
( 5 ) Whether, or the extent to which, the public will be permitted to attend or participate;
( 6 ) An explanation of how any person who wishes to do so may file a written statement with the committee before, during, or after the meeting; and
( 7 ) The procedure by which a public attendee may present an oral statement or question to members of the committee.
#### § 8c.1 Purpose.

This part effectuates section 119 of the Rehabilitation, Comprehensive Services, and Developmental Disabilities Amendments of 1978, which amended section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to prohibit discrimination on the basis of handicap in programs or activities conducted by Executive agencies or the United States Postal Service.
### §12132. Discrimination

Subject to the provisions of this subchapter, no qualified individual with a disability shall, by reason of such disability, be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of the services, programs, or activities of a public entity, or be subjected to discrimination by any such entity.

(Pub. L. 101–336, title II, §202, July 26, 1990, 104 Stat. 337.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 18 months after July 26, 1990, see section 205(a) of Pub. L. 101–336, set out as a note under section 12131 of this title.
NRC ANNOUNCES INTERNATIONAL REGULATORS CONFERENCE 

ON NUCLEAR SECURITY, DEC. 4-6, 2012 

Registration for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s International Regulators 

Conference on Nuclear Security in Rockville, Md., closes Nov. 9. Anyone wishing to attend, 

including media, must register online at www.nrcsecurityconference.org. 

The conference is a direct result of the 2012 Nuclear Security Summit in Seoul, South 

Korea. The NRC will welcome the international community Dec. 4-6 to join the discussion on 

global nuclear security while solidifying relationships among regulatory agencies worldwide. 

Keynote speakers will include Yukiya Amano, director general of the International 

Atomic Energy Agency; John O. Brennan, assistant to President Obama for homeland security 

and counterterrorism; Ambassador Glyn T. Davies, U.S. special representative for North Korea 

policy; Mark Weatherford, deputy undersecretary for cyber security at the U.S. Department of 

Homeland Security.

The conference will be held at the Hilton Washington DC/Rockville Hotel & Executive 

Meeting Center, 1750 Rockville Pike, in Rockville, Md., on Dec. 4-6. Interested individuals can 

find additional information, registration, and hotel reservations online at: 

www.nrcsecurityconference.org. 

###

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand.

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 12-122 November 8, 2012
ORIGINAI 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

FILED PR 06-0544 

IN RE PETITION OF NGUYEN-VU PHAM FOR 

REINSTATEMENT TO ACTIVE STATUS IN THE 

BAR OF MONTANA 

MAY 2 3 2023 

Bowen Greenwood 

Clark of Supreme Court 

State of vInntana 

ORDER 

Nguyen-Vu Pham has petitioned for reinstatement to active status in the State Bar 

of Montana. Pham was placed on inactive status by the State Bar of Montana pursuant to 

Rules 3B2, 5, and 12 of the Rules for Continuing Legal Education (CLE) on November 30, 

2022 as a result of noncompliance with CLE requirements. In accordance with Rule 13 of 

the CLE Rules, Pham has provided a letter from the State Bar certifying that Pham has now 

completed all CLE requirements "through the reporting year that ended March 31, 2023." 

The Petition indicates Pham is not actively practicing law in another jurisdiction; 

has not been employed as a law clerk while on inactive status; is or has not been: 

1) suspended, disbarred, or otherwise ineligible to practice of law in another jurisdiction 

and is not currently subject to disciplinary proceedings or pending disciplinary proceedings 

in another jurisdiction, 2) charged with a criminal offense, 3) accrued delinquent debt or 

filed for bankruptcy, 4) failed to fulfill the obligations of a public office or professional 

license, or 5) committed any violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct while on 

inactive status. Good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Nguyen-Vu Pham for reinstatement 

to active status in the State Bar of Montana is GRANTED. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to the Petitioner and the State 

Bar of Montana. 

DATED this2 3 day of May, 2023. 

71/ $ 73 • 4Q • e) f 

Chief Justice 

05/23/2023

Case Number: PR 06-0544