Dale Barr's 

Petition for Exemption Under Section 333 

October 19,2015 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., 

SE Washington DC 20590 

Re: Exemption Seeking Relief from the requirements of Title 14 of the code of Federal Regulations 

Sections 21; 45.23 (b); 61.113 (a) & (b); 61.133 (a); 91.7 (a); 91.9 (b); 91.103 (b); 91.109; 91.119; 91.121; 

91.151 (a)&(b); 91.203(a)&(b); 91.405 (a); 91.407(a)(1); 91.409 (a)(1)&(a)(2); 91.417 (a)&(b) concern 

commercial operation of a DJI Phantom 3 unmanned aircraft system pursuant to section 333 of The FAA 

Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (Public Law 112-95). 

To Whom This May Concern: 

I, Dale Barr (the applicant), request an exemptionpursuantto 14 C.F.R. §11.61 and Section 333 of the FAA 

Modernization and Reform Act of2012 from the requirements of 14 CFR § 21; 45.23(b); 61.113(a)&(b), 

61.133(a); 91.7(a), 91.9(b); 91.103(b); 91.109; 91.119; 91.121, 91.151(a)&(b), 91.203(a)&(b); 91.405(a), 

91.407(a)(1), 99(a)(1)and (a)(2); 91.417(a)&(b). This exemption will permit the me to operate my small 

Unmanned Aircraft System's (sUAS) for the commercial purpose of conducting: aerial video and photography 

of/for residential and commercial real estate for marketing/sales; home, business and infrastructure inspections; 

construction; architecture; environmental assessment; land surveying and mapping, general photography and 

private events. 

I as an experienced pilot and sole operator of the named sUAS vehicle, consisting of one DJI Phantom 3, will 

increase public knowledge of sUAS and promote safe sUAS operations. The DJI Phantom 3 aircraft is GPS 

assisted for location based information, and includes a "Return to Home" safety feature in case of signal loss. I 

will perform all pre-flight and post flight checks, and system/vehicle maintenance. All flights will be L.O.S. 

and will have a spotter as needed. All flights will maintain less than 400' A.G.L. The DJI Phantom 3 craft 

weighs less than seven (7) pounds with attachments and is battery operated, which are quiet and will not disrupt 

surrounding neighbors and businesses. The DJI Phantom 3 aircraft also has a safety feature in the software 

which will not allow it to spool up the motors if within a certain distance of Class AlBIC, etc .... airports. 

The use of this aircraft is financially viable as the cost to the consumer is much less than hiring a full size 

aircraft and pilot. The aircraft is also safer and can access areas a full size aircraft can't. For home inspections, 

they also allow a total roof inspection without the need of ladders and harnesses, which also creates a safer and· 

less costly option to the client. 

This applicant is fully committed to safety with each flight. Approval of the exemption request would permit 

the operation of a sUAS(s) in areas away from the general public, airports, heliports and vehicular traffic for the 

afore stated purposes. 

19-0ct-2015 Page 1 
I. Contact Information: 

Dale Barr 

15786 Moncure Ct 

Dumfries, VA 22026 

703-670-9430 

daled. barr@verizon.net 

Dale Barr's 

Petition for Exemption Under Section 333 

II. The Specific Sections of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations From Which Dale 

Barr Requests Exemption are: 

0 14 CFR Part 21; 

0 14 CFR 61.113(a) & (b); 

0 14 C.F.R. 91.7(a); 

0 14 C.F.R. 91.103(b); 

0 14 C.F.R. 91.119; 

0 14 C.F.R. 91.203(a) & (b); 

0 14 C.F.R. 91.203(a)&(b); 

0 14 CFR 407(a)(1); 

0 14 CFR417(a) & (b) 

III. The Extent of and Reason For Relief: 

0 14 C.F.R. 45.23(b); 

0 14 CFR 61.133(a); 

0 14 C.F.R. 91.9(b); 

0 14 C.F. R. 91.109; 

0 14 C.F.R. 91.121; 

0 14 C.F.R. 91.151(a) & (b); 

0 14 C.F.R. 91.405(a); 

0 14 CFR 409(a) (1) & (a) (2); 

I, Dale Barr (the applicant), herein request pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of2012 and the 

procedures contained within 14 C.F.R. 11, an exemption from the Federal Aviation Regulations ("FARs") listed 

below so that I may operate my small light weight unmanned aircraft system ("sUAS") commercially in 

airspace regulated by the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA"). The Reform Act in Section 332 provides 

for such integration of civil unmanned aircraft systems into our national airspace system as it is in the public's 

interest to do so. This DJI Phantom 3 light-weight sUAS meets the definition of"small unmanned aircraft" as 

defined in Section 331 and therefore the integration of my light-weight sUAS is expressly contemplated by the 

Reform Act. The Reform Act guides the Secretary in determining the types of sUAS's that may operate safely in 

our national airspace system. Considerations include: The weight, size, speed and overall capabilities of the 

sUAS's, whether the sUAS will be operated near airports or heavily populated areas; and, whether the sUAS 

will be operated by line of sight 112 P.L. 95 § 333 (a). Each of these items weigh in favor for granting my 

exemption. The DJI Phantom 3 sUAS utilizes four (4) counter-rotating propellers for balance, control and 

stability and is equipped with a GPS and auto return safety technology. Weighing less than seven (7) pounds 

(far below the maximum 55 pound limit); including camera with gimbal. 

I will operate the DJI Phamtom 3 in a safe manner, using the following checklists as well as operating 

procedures to determine that the aircraft is physically and electronically ready for safe flight and that permission 

from the property owner/representative is received: 

Pre-flight Checklist: 

0 Survey the property for hazards, such as trees, utility poles and other elements that might 

compromise the flight then make a judgment as to whether to proceed. 

0 Check the weather for wind speed, cloud cover and any forecast changes that might 

adversely affect flight safety and performance. 

19-0ct-2015 Page2 
Dale Barr's 

Petition for Exemption Under Section 333 

0 Examine the aircraft- looking at connections and searching for cracks and loose parts. 

0 Determine that the electronic elements are performing correctly (receiving more than 6 GPS 

signals along with calibration of the magnetic compass). 

0 Determine that the barometric altimeter reflects approximately 0 feet AGL. 

0 Foil owing takeoff, hover at an altitude of approximately 10 feet to assure that the Home 

Point is solid. Then exercise all controls to confirm their functionality, if one of the controls is 

not functioning, the flight will be terminated immediately. 

0 Not fly over dense traffic or crowds. 

0 Give right-of-way to any manned aircraft. 

0 Stay clear ofF AA controlled airspace at airports (generally a five nautical mile radius) as 

well as restricted and prohibited zones. 

0 Fly no higher than 400' and no further than 1 000' from the Home Point, recognizing that the 

primary responsibility is to safely keep the aircraft safely within VLOS. 

0 Stay clear of clouds and fog (500' vertically and 2,000' horizontally). 

Post-flight Checklist: 

0 Inspect the sUAS to determine its physical and electronic condition. 

0 Examine the aircraft- looking at connections and searching for cracks and loose parts. 

IV. This Request Will Benefit the Public as a Whole: 

Aerial videography and photography has been around for a long time through manned fixed wing aircraft and 

helicopters. For small budget companies and individuals, the expense of such aerial videography and 

photography is cost prohibitive. Only large companies and high-income individuals can afford to absorb such 

expense. Manned aircraft pose a threat to the public through potential catastrophic crashes resulting in a 

potential loss of life. My DJI Phantom 3 sUAS poses no such threat since size and lack of combustible fuel 

alleviates any potential threat to the public. Congress has already proclaimed that it is in the public's interest to 

integrate commercially flown sUAS' into the national airspace system, hence the passing of the Reform Act. In 

addition my light- weight sUAS is battery powered and creates no emissions that can harm the environment. 

Conducting aerial videography and photography with the DJI Phantom 3 sUAS, instead of manned aircraft, will 

greatly benefit the public by drastically reducing the levels of air and noise pollution generated during 

traditional aerial video and still photography flight operations. By using battery power and electric motors, the 

DJI Phantom 3 sUAS produces no air pollution, and is the most viable environmentally conscious alternative to 

the cabin class, six cylinder internal combustion engine aircraft that are typically utilized for aerial video and 

photography, while burning approximately 20-30 gallons per hour of leaded aviation fuel. The DJI Phantom 3 

sUAS, while reducing the carbon footprint of aerial acquisitions, also sharply reduces noise pollution, as the 

sUAS is propelled by battery powered electric motors, rather than an internal combustion engine. 

By using the DJI Phantom 3 sUAS to perform aerial videography and photography, the substantial risk to life 

and property in the air and on the ground, which is usually associated with traditional manned 

aircraft flight operations, will be substantially reduced or completely eliminated. The DJI Phantom 3 sUAS 

(weighing less than seven (7) pounds with attachments, with a length of less than 18 inches, and with no fuel on 

board), has less physical potential for collateral damage to life and property on the ground, and in the air, 

19-0ct-2015 Page3 
Dale Barr's 

Petition for Exemption Under Section 333 

compared to the manned aircraft that typically conduct similar operations (weighing approximately 6,000 

pounds with a wingspan of approximately 42 feet, a length of34 feet, and a fuel capacity of 180 gallons). 

V. This Exemption Will Provide a Level of Safety At Least Equal To Existing Rule: 

• This sUAS weighs less than seven (7) pounds complete with a small light- weight high definition (HD) 

camera. 

• This applicant only operates the sUAS below 400 feet (well within the 400 foot permissible ceiling set 

by the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of2012). 

• This sUAS is landed prior to manufacturer recommended minimum level of battery power. 

• This sUAS is piloted through remote control/FPV only by line of sight. 

• This sUAS is equipped with GPS and several flight safety features whereby it hovers and then slowly 

lands if communication with the remote control pilot is lost. 

• The applicant only operates this sUAS in safe environments that are strictly controlled, are away from 

power lines, elevated lights, airports and actively populated areas. 

• The applicant conducts extensive pre-flight inspections and protocol, during which safety carries 

primary importance. 

• The applicant obtains all necessary permissions prior to operation. 

VI. Regulation Summary From Which The Exemption is Requested: 

0 14 CFR Part 21; 0 14 C.P.R. 45.23(b); 

0 14CFR61.113(a)&(b); 0 14CFR61.133(a); 

0 14 C.P.R. 91.7(a); 0 14 C.P.R. 91.9(b); 

0 14 C.P.R. 91.103(b); 0 14 C.F. R. 91.109; 

0 14 C.P.R. 91.119; 0 14 C.P.R. 91.121; 

0 14 C.P.R. 91.203(a) & (b); 0 14 C.P.R. 91.151(a) & (b); 

0 14 C.P.R. 91.203(a)&(b); 0 14 C.P.R. 91.405(a); 

0 14 CFR407(a) (1); 0 14 CFR409(a) (1) & (a) (2); 

0 14 CFR 417(a) & (b) 

14 C.F.R. 21: Certification Procedures for Products and Parts. 

This section outlines requirements for the issue of design and production approvals, 

airworthiness certificates, and other airworthiness approvals. 

14 C.F.R. § 45.23: Marking of the Aircraft. 

Applicable Codes of Federal Regulation require aircraft to be marked according to certain specifications. The 

applicant's, sUAS is, by definition, unmanned. Therefore does not have a cabin, cockpit or pilot station on 

which to mark certain words or phrases. Further, two-inch lettering is difficult to place on such small aircraft 

with dimensions smaller that minimal lettering requirement. Regardless, the applicant, will mark the sUAS in 

the largest possible lettering by placing the word "EXPERIMENTAL" on its fuselage as required by 14 C.F .R. 

§ 45.29 (f) so that the pilot, will see the markings. The FAA has previously issued exemptions to this regulation 

through Exemptions Nos. 8738, 10167, 10167A and 10700. 

19-0ct-2015 Page4 
Dale Barr's 

Petition for Exemption Under Section 333 

14 C.F.R. § 61.113 (a) & (b), 61.133 (a): Private Pilot Privileges and Limitations: Pilot in 

Command. Commercial Pilot Privileges and Limitations. 

Sections 61.113 (a) & (b) limit private pilots to non-commercial operations. Because the sUAS will not carry a 

pilot or passengers, the proposed operations can achieve the equivalent level of safety of current operations by 

requiring the PIC operating the aircraft to have a private pilot's license rather than a commercial pilot's license 

to operate this sUAS. Unlike a conventional aircraft that carries the pilot and passengers, the sUAS is remotely 

controlled with no living thing on board. The risks associated with the operation of the sUAS are so diminished 

from the level of risk associated with commercial operations contemplated by Part 61 when drafted, that 

allowing operations of the sUAS as requested with a private pilot as the PIC exceeds the present level of safety 

achieved by 14 C.F.R. §61.113 (a) & (b). 

14 C.F.R. § 91.7 (a): Civil aircraft airworthiness. 

14 C.F .R. § 21, Subpart H, entitled Airworthiness Certificates, sets forth requirements for procurement of 

necessary airworthiness certificates in relation to FAR § 91.203( a) (1 ). The size, weight and enclosed 

operational area of the applicants sUAS permits exemption from Part 21 because it meets (and exceeds) an 

equivalent level of safety pursuant to Section 333 of the Reform Act. The FAA is authorized to exempt aircraft 

from the airworthiness certificate requirement under both the Act (49 U.S.C. § 44701 (f)) and Section 333 of the 

Reform Act. Both pieces of legislation permit the FAA to exempt sUAS's from the airworthiness certificate 

requirement in consideration of the weight, size, speed, maneuverability and proximity to areas such as airports 

and dense populations. This applicant's, current sUAS' meets or exceed each of the elements. 

14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (b)(2): Civil Aircraft Flight Manual in the Aircraft. 

Section 91.9 (b)(2) provides: No person may operate a U.S.-registered civil aircraft ... (2) For which an Airplane 

or Rotorcraft Flight Manual is not required by §21.5 of this chapter, unless there is available in the aircraft a 

current approved airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual, approved manual material, markings, and placards, or 

any combination thereof. The sUAS, given its size and configuration has no ability or place to carry such a 

flight manual on the aircraft, not only because there is no pilot on board, but because there is no room or 

capacity to carry such an item on the aircraft. 

14 C.F.R. § 91.109 (a): Flight Instruction. 

Section 91.109 provides that no person may operate a civil aircraft (except a manned free balloon) that is being 

used for flight instruction unless that aircraft has fully functioning dual controls. sUAS and remotely piloted 

aircraft, by their design do not have fully functional dual controls. Flight control is accomplished through the 

use of a control box that communicates with the aircraft via radio communications. The FAA has approved 

exemptions for flight training without fully functional dual controls for a number of aircraft and for flight 

instruction in experimental aircraft. 

14 C.F.R. § 91.119: Minimum Safe Altitudes. 

Section 91.119 establishes safe altitudes for operation of civil aircraft. Section 91.119 (d) allows helicopters to 

be operated at less than the minimums prescribed, provided the person operating the helicopter complies with 

any route or altitudes prescribed for helicopters by the FAA. As this exemption is for a sUAS that is a helicopter 

and the exemption requests authority to operate at altitudes up to 400 AGL, or not more than 200 above an 

elevated platform from which filming is planned, an exemption may be needed to allow such operations. As set 

forth herein, except for the limited conditions stated in the Manual, the UAS will never operate at higher than 

19-0ct-2015 PageS 
Dale Barr's 

Petition for Exemption Under Section 333 

400 AGL. The equivalent level of safety will be achieved given the size, weight and speed of the sUAS as well 

as the location where it is operated. 

14 C.F.R. § 91.121 Altimeter Settings. 

This regulation requires each person operating an aircraft to maintain cruising altitude by reference to an 

altimeter that is set " ... to the elevation of the departure airport or an appropriate altimeter setting available 

before departure." As the sUAS may not have a barometric altimeter, but instead a GPS altitude read out, an 

exemption is needed. 

14 C.F.R. § 91.151 (a): Fuel Requirements for Flight in VFR Conditions. 

This regulation prohibits an individual from beginning "a flight in an airplane under VFR conditions unless 

(considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended 

landing, and, assuming normal cruising speed- (1) During the day, to fly after that for at least 30 minutes; or 

(2) At night, to fly after that for at least 45 minutes." The battery powering the sUAS provides approximately 18 

minutes of powered flight. To meet the 30-minute reserve requirement in 14 CFR § 91.151, sUASs flights 

would be limited to approximately 10 minutes in length. Given the limitations on the sUAS proposed flight area 

and the location of its proposed operations within a predetermined area, a longer time frame for flight in 

daylight or night VFR conditions is reasonable. Limiting sUAS flights to 10 minutes would greatly reduce the 

utility for which the exemption will be granted. An equivalent level of safety can be achieved by limiting 

flights to 20 minutes or 25% of battery power whichever is reached first. This restriction would be more than 

adequate to return the sUAS to its planned landing zone from anywhere in its limited operating area. 

14 C.F.R. § 91.203 (a)&(b): Carrying Civil Aircraft Certification and Registration. 

The regulation provides in pertinent part: (a) Except as provided in§ 91.715, no person may operate a civil 

aircraft unless it has within it the following: (1) An appropriate and current airworthiness certificate .... (b) No 

person may operate a civil aircraft unless the airworthiness certificate required by paragraph (a) of this section 

or a special flight authorization issued under §91.715 is displayed at the cabin or cockpit entrance so that it is 

legible to passengers or crew. The sUAS, fully loaded, weighs no more than 55lbs. and is operated without an 

onboard pilot. As such, there is no ability or place to carry certification and registration documents or to display 

them on the sUAS. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by keeping these documents at the ground 

control point where the PIC flying the sUAS will have immediate access to the extent they are applicable to the 

sUAS. 

14 C.F.R. § 91.405 (a); 407 (a)(1); 409 (a)(1),(a)(2); 417 (a)&(b): Maintenance Inspections. 

These regulations require that an aircraft operator or owner "shall have that aircraft inspected as prescribed in 

subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, 

have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter ... " and others shall inspect or maintain the 

aircraft in compliance with Part 43. Given that these section and Part 43 apply only to aircraft with an 

airworthiness certificate, these sections will not apply to the applicant. An equivalent level of safety will be 

achieved because this sUAS is very limited in size and will carry a small payload and operate only in restricted 

areas for limited periods of time. If mechanical issues arise the sUAS can land immediately and will be 

operating from no higher than 400 feet AGL. The operator is the person most familiar with the aircraft and best 

suited to maintain the aircraft in an airworthy condition to provide the equivalent level of safety. 

19-0ct-2015 Page6 
.. 

Dale Barr's 

Petition for Exemption Under Section 333 

THE APPLICABLE LEGAL STANDARD UNDER SECTION 333: 

Approval of this exemption application advances the Congressional mandate in Section 333 of the Reform Act 

to accelerate the introduction of sUASs into the NAS if it can be accomplished safely. This law directs the 

Secretary of Transportation to consider whether certain UASs may operate safely in the NAS before completion 

of the rulemaking required under Section 332 of the Reform Act. In making this determination, the Secretary is 

required to determine which types of sUASs do not create a hazard to users of the NAS, the public, or pose a 

threat to national security in light of the 

following: 

• The VAS's size, weight, speed, and operational capability; 

• Operation of the U AS in close proximity to airports and populated areas; and 

• Operation of the UAS within visual line of sight of the PIC. 

Reform Act§ 333 (a) (1). If the Secretary determines that such vehicles "may operate safely in the 

national airspace system, the Secretary shall establish requirements for the safe operation of such 

aircraft in the national airspace system." Id. § 333 (c). The Federal Aviation Act expressly grants the 

FAA the authority to issue exemptions. This statutory authority, by its terms, includes exempting civil 

aircraft, as the term is defined under§ 40101 of the Act, from the requirement that all civil aircraft 

must have a current airworthiness certificate and those regulations requiring commercial pilots to 

operate aircraft in commercial service: 

The Administrator may grant an exemption from a requirement of a regulation prescribed under 

subsection (a) or (b) of this section or any of sections 4470244716 of this title if the Administrator 

finds the exemption is in the public interest. The grant of the requested exemption is in the public 

interest based on the clear direction in Section 333 of the Reform Act; the additional authority in the 

Federal Aviation Act, as amended; the strong equivalent level of safety surrounding the proposed 

operations; and the significant public benefit, including enhanced safety and cost savings associated 

with use ofUASs for aerial videography/photography, the reduction or elimination of unregulated 

operators, and the safe integration ofUASs. Accordingly, the applicant respectfully requests that the 

FAA grant the requested exemption without delay. 

In summary, Dale Barr seeks an exemption from the following Regulations: 

I herein affirm my request for this exemption for the commercial purpose of conducting aerial video and 

photography of residential and commercial real estate for marketing/sale; home, business and infrastructure 

inspections; construction; architecture; environmental assessment; land surveying and mapping, general 

photography and private events. My business model is based on the idea of offering ad hoc small sUAS 

services to individuals or companies who wish to employ these services as a safe, effective, and legal option to 

enhance their business or hobby. 

The requested exemption should be granted because the proposed operation of the DJI Phantom 3, sUAS 

weighing less than seven (7) pounds, inclusive of battery and payload, conducted in the strict conditions 

outlined above, will provide an equivalent or better level of safety, as. Congress intended, while still allowing 

commercial operations. The lightweight aircraft covered by the exemption is far safer than conventional 

operations conducted with helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft operating in close proximity to the ground and 

people. The seven factors Congress directed the FAA to consider when approving Section 333 exemption 

19-0ct-2015 Page7 
Dale Barr's 

Petition for Exemption Under Section 333 

petitions- size, weight, speed, operational capability, proximity to airports, proximity to populated areas, and 

operation within visual line of sight - each support the request. In particular, the aircraft is small, and will 

operate at slow speeds, close to the ground, far from airports and in a low risk, low and controlled population 

environment. 

In closing, I respectfully request that the FAA grant my exemption request. Thank you for your time and 

consideration of this exemption request. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Dale Barr 

15786 Moncure Ct 

Montclair, Va 22026 

703-670-9430 

daled. barr@verizon.net 

19·0Ct·2015 PageS