alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FORM 13F COVER PAGE

Report for the Calendar Year or Quarter Ended: March 31, 2011

Check here if Amendment [   ]; Amendment Number:
This Amendment (Check only one.):  [   ] is a restatement.
                                   [   ] adds new holdings entries.

Institutional Investment Manager Filing this Report:

Name:    The Continental Corporation
Address: 333 S. Wabash
	 Chicago,IL 60604


13F File Number:  28-172

The institutional investment manager filing this report and the
person by whom it is signed hereby represent that the person
signing the report is authorized to submit it, that all
information contained herein is true, correct, and complete, and
that it is understood that all required items, statements,
schedules, lists, and tables, are considered integral parts of
this form.


Person Signing this Report on Behalf of Reporting Manager:

Name:  Lynne Gugenheim
Title: SVP & Deputy General Counsel
Phone: (312) 822 4921
Signature, Place, and Date of Signing:

/s/ Lynne Gugenheim                Chicago, IL                        05/16/2011
---------------------------------  ---------------------------------  ----------
[Signature]                        [City, State]                      [Date]



The securities on which The Continental Corporation exercises
shared investment discretion have been reported upon by CNA Financial
Corporation on behalf of The Continental Corporation.

Report Type (Check only one.):

 [    ]              13F HOLDINGS REPORT.

 [  x ]              13F NOTICE.

 [    ]              13F COMBINATION REPORT.

List of Other Managers Reporting for this Manager:

CNAF Financial Corporation

<Page>
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-15-0026:  Insider Threat Program Policy and Implementation Plan.

Accession Number: ML14338A111

Date Released: Wednesday, March 11, 2015

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML14338A123 - SECY-15-0026:  Insider Threat Program Policy and Implementation Plan (6 page(s), 2/24/2015)
    - ML14338A129 - SECY-15-0026:  Enclosure 1 - Insider Threat Program Policy Statement (2 page(s), 2/24/2015)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
### §1109. Federal Employees Compensation Account

There is hereby established in the Unemployment Trust Fund a Federal Employees Compensation Account which shall be used for the purposes specified in section 8509 of title 5. For the purposes provided for in section 1104(e) of this title, such account shall be maintained as a separate book account.

(Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title IX, §909, as added Pub. L. 96–499, title X, §1023(a), Dec. 5, 1980, 94 Stat. 2657.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1109, act Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title IX, §909, 49 Stat. 643, related to an additional credit against tax. For further details, see Prior Law note set out preceding section 1101 of this title.
No: III-14-018 May 15, 2014

CONTACT: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663

NRC Issues Order Prohibiting a Contractor for a Cardiology Practice

From Participating in Licensed Activities for Three Years

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued an Order barring the chief technical officer of 

University Nuclear and Diagnostics LLC (UND) from participating in NRC-licensed activities for three 

years. While performing contract work for an NRC licensee located in South Haven, Mich., Armando

Clavero engaged in deliberate misconduct causing the licensee to violate NRC regulations.

The agency also issued a Severity Level III Notice of Violation to UND, based in Davie, Fla., 

and licensed by the state of Florida to use diagnostic nuclear material. The violation requires the 

company to provide the NRC with a response outlining the actions the company has taken to correct the 

violations. The violations occurred while the company was implementing a nuclear medicine program 

for Bradley D. Bastow, D.O., an NRC license holder in Michigan.

The NRC staff determined that Clavero and other UND employees failed to adhere to NRC’s 

safety requirements. Specifically, they failed to conduct appropriate contamination surveys, make sure 

survey instruments were properly calibrated; and conduct regular inventories of sealed radioactive 

sources. The company also falsified records and surveys while Clavero provided false information to the 

NRC. 

“The agency’s actions against Clavero and UND underscore the expectation that NRC licensees 

and their contractors must act with integrity and comply with the requirements to protect public health 

and safety,” said NRC Region III Administrator Cynthia D. Pederson. “Since the violations occurred at 

the Bastow cardiology practice, a Confirmatory Order and a $1,000 civil penalty were already issued 

against the company for violating the NRC’s safety requirements in Sept. 2013.”

The NRC’s prohibition order directs Clavero to cease all activities involving NRC-licensed 

activities and notify the NRC for a year following the three-year prohibition period if he becomes 

involved in NRC-licensed activities. 

The NRC’s prohibition order (ML14126A742) and notice of violation (ML14125A346) will be

available on the NRC’s website .
### CMP-2

Revised: May 3, 2004 

## San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Supplemental Application Form



# Conservation Management Practices: CITRUS

Farm Name: CMP Plan Years: to

Crop Acreage:

Land Preparation/

Cultivation Select at least one of the following CMPs. Note: 100% of the total crop acreage must be covered by the selected CMPs.
Chemigation/Fertigation, ac Multiple CMPs in Another Category Conservation Irrigation, ac Non-Tillage/Chemical Tillage, ac Equipment Change/Tech. Improvements, ac Other (approved on a case-by-case basis), ac Please describe the specifics of the practice(s) chosen above:



### Harvest Select at least one of the following CMPs. Note: 100% of the total crop acreage must be covered by the selected CMPs.
Hand Harvesting, ac Other (approved on a case-by-case basis), ac Multiple CMPs in Another Category
Please describe the specifics of the practice(s) chosen above:



### Other Select at least one of the following CMPs.
Note: 100% of the total crop acreage must be covered by the selected CMPs.

Bulk Materials Control Night Farming, ac Conservation Irrigation, ac No Burning, ac Cover Crops, ac Organic Practices, ac Grinding/Chipping/Shredding, ac Permanent Crop, ac Integrated Pest Management (IPM), ac Soil Amendments, ac Irrigation Power Units Surface Roughening, ac Multiple CMPs in Another Category Other (approved on a case-by-case basis), ac Please describe the specifics of the practice(s) chosen above: CMP

2
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3608 

To direct the Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security (Transportation Security Administration) to prohibit certain employees of the Transportation 

Security Administration from using the title of ‘‘officer’’ and from wearing uniforms and carrying badges resembling those of law enforcement 

officers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 8, 2011 

Mrs. BLACKBURN (for herself, Mr. FORBES, Mrs. LUMMIS, Mr. WALSH of Illinois, Mr. FLEMING, Mr. POSEY, Mr. FLORES, Mr. GARRETT, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. MARCHANT, Mr. GINGREY of Georgia, Mr. DUNCAN of 

Tennessee, Mr. POE of Texas, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mr. MICA, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. PENCE, Mr. 

REICHERT, Ms. HERRERA BEUTLER, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, Mrs. 

ELLMERS, Mr. GRIFFIN of Arkansas, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, and Mr. 

KING of Iowa) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To direct the Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security 

(Transportation Security Administration) to prohibit certain employees of the Transportation Security Administration from using the title of ‘‘officer’’ and from wearing 

uniforms and carrying badges resembling those of law 

enforcement officers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3608 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop TSA’s Reach In 

3 Policy Act’’ or the ‘‘STRIP Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN EMPLOYEES OF THE 

5 TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRA6 TION USING THE TITLE ‘‘OFFICER’’ AND 

7 WEARING UNIFORMS RESEMBLING THOSE OF 

8 LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS. 

9 The Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security 

10 (Transportation Security Administration) shall prohibit 

11 any employee of the Transportation Security Administra12 tion who has not received Federal law enforcement train13 ing or is not eligible for Federal law enforcement benefits 

14 from— 

15 (1) using the official job title of ‘‘officer’’; or 

16 (2) wearing a metal badge resembling a police 

17 badge or a uniform resembling the uniform of a 

18 Federal law enforcement officer. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Mary Ella Miller, Appellant, v. Helen J. M. Robinson, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
§ 3.38A Withholding requested material. ( a ) Any person withholding material responsive to a subpoena issued pursuant to § 3.34 or § 3.36, written interrogatories requested pursuant to § 3.35, a request for production or access pursuant to § 3.37, or any other request for the production of materials under this part, shall assert a claim of privilege or any similar claim not later than the date set for production of the material. Such person shall, if so directed in the subpoena or other request for production, submit, together with such claim, a schedule which describes the nature of the documents, communications, or tangible things not produced or disclosed - and does so in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable other parties to assess the claim. The schedule need not describe any material outside the scope of the duty to search set forth in § 3.31(c)(2) except to the extent that the Administrative Law Judge has authorized additional discovery as provided in that paragraph.
( b ) A person withholding material for reasons described in § 3.38A(a) shall comply with the requirements of that subsection in lieu of filing a motion to limit or quash compulsory process.
(Sec. 5 of theFTC Act (15 U.S.C. 45)) [74 FR 1830, Jan. 13, 2009]
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3519 

To amend to exempt the Medicare program from fallback sequestration under 

the Budget Control Act of 2011. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 29, 2011 

Mr. TOWNS (for himself, Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. 

CLAY, Mr. CARSON of Indiana, Ms. HANABUSA, and Mr. HASTINGS of 

Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Budget 

A BILL 

To amend to exempt the Medicare program from fallback 

sequestration under the Budget Control Act of 2011. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTING MEDICARE FROM FALLBACK SE4 QUESTRATION UNDER BUDGET CONTROL 

5 ACT OF 2011. 

6 Section 251A of the Balanced Budget and Emer7 gency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (42 U.S.C. 901a), as 

8 added by section 302(a) of the Budget Control Act of 

9 2011 (Public Law 112–25), is amended— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3519 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (8), by striking ‘‘except that 

2 the percentage reduction for the Medicare programs 

3 specified in section 256(d) shall not be more than 2 

4 percent for a fiscal year’’ and inserting ‘‘except that 

5 there shall be no reduction for the Medicare pro6 grams specified in section 256(d)’’; and 

7 (2) in paragraph (9), by striking ‘‘the percent8 age reduction for the Medicare programs would ex9 ceed 2 percent for a fiscal year in the absence of 

10 paragraph (8)’’ and inserting ‘‘there would be a per11 centage reduction for the Medicare programs for a 

12 fiscal year in the absence of paragraph (8)’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
§ 1211.4 General requirements for protection against risk of injury. ( a ) If an automatically reset protective device is employed, automatic restarting of a motor shall not result in a risk of injury to persons.
( b ) A residential garage door operator is considered to comply with the requirement in paragraph (a) of this section if some means is provided to prevent the motor from restarting when the protector closes.
( c ) An electronic or solid-state circuit that performs a back-up, limiting, or other function intended to reduce the risk of fire, electric shock, or injury to persons, including entrapment protection circuits, shall comply with the requirements in UL 991 (incorporated by reference, see § 1211.40), including environmental and stress tests appropriate to the intended usage of the end-product. Exception: A control or electronic circuit that complies with Supplement SA of UL 325-2017 (incorporated by reference, see § 1211.40) is considered to fulfill this requirement.
[57 FR 60455, Dec. 21, 1992, as amended at 62 FR 46667, Sept. 4, 1997; 65 FR 70657, Nov. 27, 2000; 81 FR 20228, Apr. 7, 2016; 83 FR 32568, July 13, 2018]
March 18, 2015 

MEMORANDUM TO: Mark A. Satorius 

 Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS – SECY-14-0146 – TRIBAL POLICY 

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 

The Commission has approved the staff’s Tribal Policy Statement Implementation Plan subject 

to the following additional comments and changes. 

On a going forward basis, the Tribal Policy Statement Implementation Plan should be subject to 

modification, update, public comment opportunity, and revision as the staff sees necessary. 

Commission approval of the Tribal Policy Statement Implementation Plan does not constitute 

approval of an "increase in Federal, State, and Tribal Liaison Branch FTE for FY16 to 6.0 FTE" 

and by approval of this plan the Commission is not approving such an increase. When funding 

levels have been enacted for FY 2016 the staff should propose such an increase, if still 

appropriate, for the Commission's review and approval as an element of the FY 2016 budget 

implementation plan. 

The staff should add examples of training sessions under section 2.1 Policy Principal 1: Federal 

Trust Recognition, subsection (1). Some examples could include health physics, NRC 

regulations, NEPA, and procedures in environmental sampling. 

The following changes should be made to the Tribal Policy Statement Implementation Plan: 

a. On page 4, revise line 1 from the top to read ‘ ... Directive 5.1 (ML14240A083

ML041770442), NMSS ....’ 

b. On page 5, revise lines 1 and 2 from the top to read ‘ ... contains the following six 

principles to guide in its interactions with Tribal officials and members of Tribes:.’ 

State the six principles. 

c. On page 5, revise line 2 from the top start a new paragraph with the 2nd sentence 

after insertion of the six principles and revise to read ‘ ... based on those these six 

policy principles and identifies activities that implement those these principles. For 

those ....’ 

d. On page 6, 2nd full paragraph, revise line 2 to read ‘ ... Energy Act of 1954, as 

amended (AEA) ....’ 

e. On page 11, 1st full paragraph, revise lines 6 and 7 to read ‘ ... notices of 

Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement NEPA document publication, ....’ 
f. On page 16, 1st full paragraph, include a brief statement of the distinction noted in 

line 1. 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA 

 OPA 

 Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR
### §11050. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1986, such sums as may be necessary to carry out this chapter.

(Pub. L. 99–499, title III, §330, Oct. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 1758.)
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 19

- 537

_____________________________ C ARMUS R. S HAW , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Baker County

. Mark W. Moseley , Judge

. July 24, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W OLF , R OBERTS , and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Carmus R. Shaw, pro se
, Appellant.2 Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
**EXHIBIT 99.4**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. §1350,**

 

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of SierraWireless, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,I, David G. McLennan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuantto 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date:  March 23,2006

 

 
| /s/  DAVID G. MCLENNAN   |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| David  G. McLennan       |
| Chief  Financial Officer |

 

1

----
Ex-10.1



 





Exhibit 10.1




AMENDMENT TO THE

LUMINEX CORPORATION AMENDED AND RESTATED

2000 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN




     WHEREAS, Luminex Corporation (the “Company”) maintains the Luminex Corporation Amended and
Restated 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); and



     WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 13 of the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company (the
“Board”) may amend the Plan; and



     WHEREAS, the Board desires to amend the Plan to revise the provisions in Section 6.2(c) of the
Plan regarding adjustments to the shares of the Company’s common stock, or awards granted under the
Plan in connection with a recapitalization (or other similar event).



     NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of the date hereof, the Board hereby amends and restates Section
6.2(c) of the Plan in its entirety to read as follows:




     (c) In the event of changes in the outstanding Common Stock by reason of a Corporate
Transaction (as hereinafter defined), recapitalizations, reorganizations, mergers,
consolidations, combinations, separations (including a spin-off or other distribution of
stock or property), exchanges, or other relevant changes in capitalization occurring after
the date of grant of any Award and not otherwise provided for by this Section 6.2, any
outstanding Awards and any Award Agreements evidencing such Awards shall be equitably and
proportionately adjusted by the Board as to the number, price and kind of shares or other
consideration subject to, and other terms of, such Awards to reflect such changes in the
outstanding Common Stock.



     FURTHER RESOLVED, that the officers of the Company be, and each of them hereby is, authorized,
empowered and directed in the name and on behalf of the Company to take or cause to be taken all
such further actions and to execute and deliver or cause to be executed and delivered all such
further agreements, instruments and documents in the name and on behalf of the Company and to incur
and pay all such fees and expenses as in their judgment shall be necessary or advisable in order to
consummate the transactions contemplated by, and carry out fully the intent and purpose of, the
preceding resolutions and each of them.
No: 13-035 May 13, 2013

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

ASLB: San Onofre Confirmatory Action Letter Process Offers

Opportunity for Adjudicatory Hearing

The Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB) has decided partially in favor of a public 

interest group that petitioned for a hearing on the NRC’s Confirmatory Action Letter process regarding 

steam generator issues at the San Onofre nuclear power plant in California. The ASLB is a threemember board of administrative judges independent of the NRC staff that conducts adjudicatory 

hearings on major agency licensing actions.

The board’s decision concludes that this particular Confirmatory Action Letter process, in 

which San Onofre seeks to restart Unit 2, is effectively a license amendment proceeding. Therefore the 

Atomic Energy Act and NRC rules give the public the opportunity for an adjudicatory hearing. The 

Board’s decision provided the public interest group, Friends of the Earth, with the relief it requested –

namely, the opportunity for a hearing on the license amendment. Accordingly, the Board’s decision 

terminates the proceeding at the Board level. The Board also offered reasons why this decision applies 

only to the unusual facts in the San Onofre process and not to the whole category of Confirmatory 

Action Letters.

San Onofre discovered unexpectedly severe levels of wear in its steam generator tubes in 

early 2012, and the NRC issued the Confirmatory Action Letter in March 2012 to ensure the plant 

would appropriately explain and account for the steam generator wear before the plant could restart. In 

June 2012, Friends of the Earth asked the five-member Commission in charge of the agency to require 

an adjudicatory hearing. The Commission instructed the ASLB in November 2012 to examine whether 

the NRC’s procedures mandated an adjudicatory hearing in this particular case. On March 22, 2013, the 

board heard arguments from the plant owner, Southern California Edison, from Friends of the Earth, 

and from NRC legal staff.

Southern California Edison applied for a related license amendment on April 5, 2013, and the 

NRC issued a Federal Register notice on April 16, providing the public the opportunity to request a 

hearing.

The ASLB’s decision can be appealed to the Commission. Documents related to the San 

Onofre steam generator issue are available on the NRC website. Documents regarding this ASLB 

proceeding, including today’s decision, will be available on the NRC’s Electronic Hearing Docket by 

clicking on the folder entitled “San_Onofre_50-361&50-362-CAL” on the left side of the page. More 

information about the role of the ASLB in the licensing process is available on the NRC website.

###