alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 260.16 Renewable materials claims. ( a ) It is deceptive to misrepresent, directly or by implication, that a product or package is made with renewable materials.
( b ) Research suggests that reasonable consumers may interpret renewable materials claims differently than marketers may intend. Unless marketers have substantiation for all their express and reasonably implied claims, they should clearly and prominently qualify their renewable materials claims. For example, marketers may minimize the risk of unintended implied claims by identifying the material used and explaining why the material is renewable.
( c ) Marketers should also qualify any “made with renewable materials” claim unless the product or package (excluding minor, incidental components) is made entirely with renewable materials.
Example 1: A marketer makes the unqualified claim that its flooring is “made with renewable materials.” Reasonable consumers likely interpret this claim to mean that the flooring also is made with recycled content, recyclable, and biodegradable. Unless the marketer has substantiation for these implied claims, the unqualified “made with renewable materials” claim is deceptive. The marketer could qualify the claim by stating, clearly and prominently, “Our flooring is made from 100 percent bamboo, which grows at the same rate, or faster, than we use it.” The marketer still is responsible for substantiating all remaining express and reasonably implied claims.
Example 2: A marketer's packaging states that “Our packaging is made from 50% plant-based renewable materials. Because we turn fast-growing plants into bio-plastics, only half of our product is made from petroleum-based materials.” By identifying the material used and explaining why the material is renewable, the marketer has minimized the risk of unintended claims that the product is made with recycled content, recyclable, and biodegradable. The marketer has adequately qualified the amount of renewable materials in the product.
§ 1615.3 General requirements. ( a ) *Summary of test method.* Five conditioned specimens, 8.9 × 25.4 cm. (3.5 × 10 in.), are suspended one at a time vertically in holders in a prescribed cabinet and subjected to a standard flame along their bottom edge for a specified time under controlled conditions. The char length is measured.
( b ) *Test criteria.* The test criteria when the testing is done in accordance with § 1615.4 *Test procedure* are: ( 1 ) *Average char length.* The average char length of five specimens shall not exceed 17.8 cm. (7.0 in.).
( 2 ) *Full specimen burn.* No individual specimen shall have a char length of 25.4 cm. (10 in.).
[40 FR 59903, Dec. 30, 1975, as amended at 43 FR 4853, Feb. 6, 1978]
### subpart 3—application to medicare advantage program and treatment of employer-sponsored programs and other prescription drug plans
### subpart 16—national institute of mental health
EXHIBIT 10.1  AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN DTS, INC. AND MR. BRIAN TOWNE  This amendment (Amendment),
effective as of 28 June 2010, is made and entered into by and between DTS, Inc.,
having a principal place of business at 5220 Las Virgenes Road, Calabasas,
California 91302 U.S.A. (hereinafter referred to as DTS) and Mr. Brian
Towne (Employee), having a permanent residence at 29743 Quail Run Dr., Agoura
Hills, CA 91301.  WHEREAS,
DTS and Employee have previously entered into an Employment Agreement effective
14 April 2009 (hereinafter referred to as the Agreement); and  WHEREAS, the parties wish to
Amend Mr. Townes Title, Duties and Base Salary set forth in the
Agreement.  NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the respective covenants contained herein, the
parties agree as follows:  The following Sections of
the Agreement are hereby replaced in their entirety to read as follows:  Title:
  Executive Vice
  President & Chief Operating OfficerDuties:
  You agree to serve the
  Company as its Executive Vice President & Chief Operating Officer.
  Your duties are as defined in the Companys job description for the position
  or as otherwise specified by the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
  Company. During the Term of this Agreement, you will devote full time to, and
  use your best efforts to advance, the business and welfare of the Company.Base
  Salary:
  $325,000 per year payable
  biweekly and subject to payroll deductions as may be necessary or customary
  in respect of the Companys salaried employees in general.  All
capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the same
meaning as in the Agreement.  This
Amendment does not delete, terminate or replace any provision of Agreement
except as specifically provided herein.  IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day
and date first written above.  MR.
  BRIAN TOWNE
  
  DTS, INC.By:
  /s/ Brian D. Towne
  
  By:
  /s/ Jon E. KirchnerMr. Brian Towne
  
  
  Jon KirchnerChairman & CEODate:
  June 28, 2010
  
  Date:
  June 28, 2010
EXHIBIT
32.2








CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Steven M.
Plumb,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Edgeline Holdings,
Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in such  Form 10-Q fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Oncolin Therapeutics, Inc.





Date:  September
10, 2008














By: /s/ Steven M.
Plumb


Steven
M. Plumb


Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6303

DEVERAL WITHERS, a/k/a Deveral Whithers,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

R. M. WUERGLER, Lieutenant,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

BEDFORD SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, Bedford Regional Annex,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Magistrate Judge.

(CA-97-511-R)

Submitted: May 19, 1998 Decided: June 3, 1998

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Deveral Withers, Appellant Pro Se. William Carrington Thompson,

Chatham, Virginia, for Appellee.
* The parties consented to jurisdiction of the magistrate

judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c) (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint.* We have reviewed

the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Withers v. Bedford Sheriff's Dep't,, No. CA-97-511-R

(W.D. Va. Feb. 11, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
§ 1115.22 Prohibited acts and sanctions. ( a ) *Statements generally.* Whoever knowingly and willfully falsifies, or conceals a material fact in a report under the CPSA and rules thereunder, is subject to criminal penalties under 18 U.S.C. 1001.
( b ) *Timeliness and adequacy of reporting.* A failure to inform the Commission immediately and adequately, as required by section 15(b) of the CPSA, is a prohibited act within section 19(a)(4) of the CPSA (15 U.S.C. 2068(a)(4)).
( c ) *Failure to make reports.* The failure or refusal to make reports or provide information as required under the CPSA is a prohibited act within the meaning of section 19(a)(3) of the CPSA (15 U.S.C. 2068(a)(3)).
( d ) *Noncomplying products.* The manufacture for sale, offering for sale, distribution in commerce, and/or importation into the United States of a consumer product which is not in conformity with an applicable consumer product safety rule under CPSA is a prohibited act within the meaning of sections 19 (a)(1) and (a)(2) of the CPSA (15 U.S.C. 2068 (a)(1) and (a)(2)).
( e ) *Orders issued under section 15 (c) and/or (d).* The failure to comply with an order issued under section 15 (c) and/or (d) of the CPSA is a prohibited act within the meaning of section 19(a)(5) of the CPSA (15 U.S.C. 2068(a)(5)).
( f ) *Consequences of engaging in prohibited acts.* A knowing violation of section 19(a) of the CPSA subjects the violator to a civil penalty in accordance with section 20 of the CPSA (15 U.S.C. 2069). “Knowing,” as defined in section 20(c) of the CPSA (15 U.S.C. 2069(c)), means the having of actual knowledge or the presumed having of knowledge deemed to be possessed by a reasonable person who acts in the circumstances, including knowledge obtainable upon the exercise of due care to ascertain the truth of representations. A knowing and willful violation of section 19(a), after the violator has received notice of noncompliance, subjects the violator to criminal penalties in accordance with section 21 of the CPSA (15 U.S.C. 2070).
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Report of DynaResource, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:




1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





/s/ K.W. Diepholz

K.W. Diepholz

Member of the Board of Directors

Dated: March 8, 2011





/s/ K.W. Diepholz

K.W. Diepholz

Chief Executive Officer

Dated: March 8, 2011



/s/ Charles Smith

Charles Smith

Chief Financial Officer

Dated: March 8, 2011





/s/ Charles Smith

Charles Smith

Principal Accounting Officer

Dated: March 8, 2011





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE

Pursuant to the requirements of the applicable Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule I hereto (each, a “Servicing Agreement”), for which KeyBank, National Association, as Master Servicer, has engaged Berkeley Point Capital LLC dba Newmark, as Primary Sub-Servicer or Limited Primary Sub-Servicer, (as reflected on Schedule I hereto) (the “Primary & Limited Primary Sub-Servicer”), the undersigned, Ronald Steffenino, Vice Chairman of, Berkeley Point Capital LLC dba Newmark, hereby certifies subject to any limitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, solely in his capacity as an officer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:

1. A review of the activities of the Primary & Limited Primary Sub-Servicer during the preceding calendar year (the “Reporting Period”) and of its performance under the applicable Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and


2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Primary & Limited Primary Sub-Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.




|                           |                  
|-------------------------- | -----------------
|Berkeley Point Capital LLC | February 22, 2023
|dba Newmark                |                  
|                           |                  
|/s/ Ronald Steffenino      |                  
|Ronald Steffenino          |                  
|Vice Chairman              |                  











img48460417_0.jpg

---

Schedule I



Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates; Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/a Newmark as Primary Sub-Servicer



|           
|-----------
|CF 2019-CF1





Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates; Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/a Newmark as Limited Primary Sub-Servicer



|                   
|-------------------
|COMM 2013-CCRE9    
|COMM 2014-CCRE16   
|COMM 2014-CCRE18   
|COMM 2014-UBS2     
|COMM 2014-UBS6     
|Citigroup 2016-GC36
|CFCRE 2018 TAN     
|CD 2018 CD7        
|2019 CF1 CCRE      
|2019 CF2 CCRE      



img48460417_0.jpg

---
#### § 1505.2 Scope of part.

This part sets forth the requirements whereby electrically operated toys and other electrically operated articles intended for use by children (as defined in § 1505.1(a)(1)) are not banned toys or banned articles under § 1500.18(b)(1) of this chapter.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Salomon Smith Barney Orion Futures Fund L.P. (the ‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Jennifer Magro, Chief Financial Officer and Director of Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

|                                                                                  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/    Jennifer Magro                                        |
| Jennifer MagroCitigroup Managed Futures LLC Chief Financial Officer and Director |

August 14, 2007

----
----

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION1350)

 

In connection withthe report of LFG International, Inc. (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for thequarter ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the "Report"), I, Lyle Durham, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to Sect. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.Sect. 1350), that to my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company. 

 

 

***/s/ Lyle Durham                           ***

Lyle Durham, Chief Financial Officer

and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: September 22, 2005           

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LEON EUGENE MORRIS,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

PETERSEN, Sergeant; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 16

- 15088

D.C. No. 3:15

- cv

- 02169

- WHO

MEMORANDUM *

LEON EUGENE MORRIS,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

IPPOLITO, Sergeant; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 16

- 15091

D.C. No. 3:15

- cv

- 01858

- WHO

Appeal s from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

William H. Orrick, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 18, 2017 **

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes these cases are suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 21 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 15088

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Leon Eugene Morris appeals pro se from the district

court’ s judgment s dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 actions under the Prison

Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)

, and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

41(b)

. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C . § 1291. We review de novo a

dismissal under § 1915(g)

. Andrews v. King , 398 F.3d 1 113, 1118 & n.6 (9th Cir.

2005)

. We vacate and remand.

The district court denied Morris’s motion s to proceed in forma pauperis

(“IFP”) on the basis that Morris had brought at least three prior actions in federal

court that were dismissed as frivolous

, malicious, o r for fail ure to state a claim , and

Morris failed to show that he was “under imminent danger of s erious physical

injury” at the time that he lodged his complaint s. 28 U.S.C. § 1915 ( g )

. However,

at the time of its decision s , the district court did not have the benefit of El

- Shaddai

v. Zamora , 833 F.3d 1036 (9th Cir. 2016) , in which this court concluded that an

appeal dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee after the revocation of IFP status

on appeal does not constitute a strike under § 1915(g) if this court makes no

finding that the appeal falls within one of the grounds enumerated in § 1915(g)

.

See i d. at 1043. We vacate the judgments and remand for the district court to

re consider Morris’ s IFP motions in light of th is intervening opinion

.

VACATED and REMANDED.
EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Octoraro Railway, Inc.

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning the continued status of 

Octoraro Railway, Inc. (ORI) (B.A. No. 2332) as an employer under the Railroad Retirement

Act (45 U.S.C. §231 et seq.) (RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C

§351 et seq.) (RUIA).

Information regarding ORI was provided by Mr. Eric D. Gerst, President of ORI. According 

to Mr. Gerst, ORI ceased operations and last compensated employees on June 30, 1994. He

also stated that ORI’s assets are being sold to satisfy debts owed to lien creditors. He stated that

the corporation has not been formally dissolved as a corporation.

Section 202.11 (20 CFR §202.11) of the Board’s regulations states:

The employer status of any company or person shall terminate whenever such company 

or person loses any of the characteristics essential to the existence of an employer status.

According to the information Mr. Gerst provided, ORI’s assets are being sold to satisfy debts 

owed to creditors. ORI no longer possesses the characteristics of an operating railroad company 

covered by the Acts; accordingly, under section 202.11 of the Board’s regulations, ORI is no

longer a covered employer under the RRA and the RUIA.

Effective with the close of business June 30, 1994, Octoraro Railway, Inc. ceased being a

covered employer under the RRA and the RUIA.

zGlen L. Bower

BCD 1995-106 BA # 2332
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-16-0000199

23-DEC-2016

08:31 AM
No: 14-077 November 5, 2014

CONTACT: Eliot Brenner, 301-415-8200 

Stephen Burns Sworn in as NRC Commissioner

Stephen Burns, a 33-year veteran of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission nominated by 

President Obama and confirmed by the Senate, was sworn in as an NRC Commissioner today. His term 

will expire on June 30, 2019.

Burns took the oath of office from NRC Chairman Allison M. Macfarlane in the Commission’s 

hearing room in Rockville, Md., becoming the 35th individual to join the commission since its inception 

in 1975.

“Steve Burns’ in-depth knowledge of the Commission, acquired from service in a wide range of 

positions at the agency, as well as his knowledge of policy development and the issues we face at the 

NRC, will be invaluable to all of us. We look forward to his service,” said Macfarlane.

“After decades of serving the Commission in a legal capacity, it is truly an honor to join the 

Commission as a member. The NRC has an important role in protecting the American people, and I 

look forward to working with our other commissioners in making decisions that strengthen nuclear 

safety and security,” said Burns. 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has five members, one of which is designated by the 

President as chairman. Commissioners formulate policies, develop regulations, issue orders to licensees 

and adjudicate legal matters. Members serve five-year terms, with one term expiring every year on June 

30. No more than three Commissioners may be of the same political party.

Most recently, Burns was the Head of Legal Affairs for the Organization for Economic 

Cooperation and Development (OECD) Nuclear Energy Agency, a position he has held since 2012. 

Prior to joining the OECD, he served at the NRC in a variety of roles for more than 30 years.

Burns, who came to the NRC in 1978, was The NRC’s General Counsel from 2009 to 2012, 

Deputy General Counsel from 1998 to 2009, and Associate General Counsel for Hearings, Enforcement 

and Administration from 1994 to 1998. He also served as Director of the Office of Commission 

Appellate Adjudication from 1991 to 1994, Executive Assistant to NRC Chairman Kenneth Carr from 

1989 to 1991, Legal Assistant to Carr from 1986 to 1989, and Deputy Director of the Regional 

Operations and Enforcement Division from 1983 to 1986.
§ 285.16 Incorporation by reference. Certain material is incorporated by reference into this part with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved material is available for inspection at National Institute of Standards and Technology, National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP), National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Room B119, Gaithersburg, MD and is available from the source(s) listed in the following paragraph(s). It is also available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For access to the NIST campus, please contact NVLAP by phone at 301-975-4016 or by email at *NVLAP@nist.gov* to obtain instructions for visitor registration. For information on the availability of this material at NARA, email *fedreg.legal@nara.gov* or go to *www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html .* ( a ) National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), U.S. Department of Commerce, 100 Bureau Drive, Room B119, Gaithersburg, MD, 301-975-4016 *NVLAP@nist.gov ,* *www.nist.gov/publications/ .* ( 1 ) NIST Handbook 150, *National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program Procedures (NVLAP) and General Requirements,* authored by Dana S. Leaman and Bethany Hackett, 2020 Edition, August 2020, 2020 (*NVLAP Procedures and General Requirements*) *https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/hb/2020/NIST.HB.150-2020.pdf ;* into §§ 285.8(a) and § 285.14.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( b ) [Reserved]
[85 FR 60061, Sept. 24, 2020]
Montreal Protocol Documents and Reports:

1.) Report of the Nineteenth Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer 2.) Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer 2010 Assessment Report of the Technology a nd Economic Assessment Panel 3.) Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer 2010 Report of the Refrigeration, Air Conditioning, and Heat Pumps Technical Options

Committee
### [§§3623 to 3625. Repealed. Pub. L. 109–435, title II, §201(b), Dec. 20, 2006, 120 Stat. 3205]

Section 3623, Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 761; Pub. L. 94–421, §8, Sept. 24, 1976, 90 Stat. 1310, related to mail classification.

Section 3624, Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 761; Pub. L. 94–421, §5(a), Sept. 24, 1976, 90 Stat. 1306, related to recommended decisions of the Postal Rate Commission.

Section 3625, Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 762; Pub. L. 103–123, title VII, §708(d), Oct. 28, 1993, 107 Stat. 1273, related to action of the Board of Governors of the Postal Service.