alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**OFFICE OF**  **THE AlTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  

### TEXAS **AUSTIN**



### Banorabla

Romar Oarrlma, Jr., Dlreotor Department

or Pub110

## 8d0t~

Dear 

### Sir:

lrtt8t or rw00mlnlon or VA18 a*- uhloh uo 

### quotot 0 Seotlon13,

to any charge under 80 ohargod produor l t o l a l o p e t a t o r l r ;

**8** 

### of tho 

### St8to there 

### are **th%8** 8OOtiOn to 

### th8 8t-

**“ 8~~0~**  **811** thrre type8 Of 1iO8Zl8088n mmtiOJl8d in thi8 8O&tOIlO8, WO OOa8tNO thi8 800- **tion W**  **roan tht**  **a poraon**  

### ohargod with oparatin g, l **Ot%mBOrOiil DOtOr**  t8hiOle 8lld**t8qUind Under**  the 1aW t0 h8T# l OOMOrOlti OD#T8tOr'r liO8li88, right 

### 6ofan4 l

uoh a o h a r g o

or n o th8L a tln g

8 o o a - morolal 

### 0 br8tf#P'8 llornrr 

### by produoing 

### ln,oourt a 00~8 0 al 

### oQ8r8tor’I lloon80 **valid 8t**  

### tho tlm8 0*TiA-

**8 W** **’ TO8tl**  

### an6 that gMdIlOi~ 

### m 098ratOt'8~ **li081188** Valid **at** 

### thr **tia8 ot**  hi8 l **TX ’**  **88t** should 

## not **bo a**  **#UOO888fUl d8fQIi88.** Honorable **Homer** Carri6on, Jr., Direotor, **F8gc 2** 

***nOa ad+188**  **U8** 

### rhleh OOll8tTUOtiOlt 18, i ln your 

### oplnim, oorroot.* The portion of 

### Artlolo**668Tb,** 

### SootlonIS, nhioh yoa quot. 

### ob~fourrlt **18** 

### intended

to **protent the**  oonr1OtiOn OS 8 

### personfor 

### aot hatlagaa opsrator'8, 

### oaiaumrolalopor

### l **tOr ’** **8,** 

### or **OhaUff8UV*8** **liOOn88 Wh6n**  **it 8pp8ar8**  **thILt** 

### ha **aO** 

### tUdlly **did htW0**  **8P@h** 1108n88 

### at th. 

### t-0 Ot hi8 

### l r O8t. IB other w~rd8, 

### lt a 

### hating **8 8aPawroi**  **s** lr 6o n 18 lrre8tad **and** ohug8d 

### with **Dot OpUPtOr** **’ 8**  11OOn8. he a4V dSiOI¶dthi8 charge **by proring**  that 

### he 

### l otually

had 8 **r8lid** 

### ooraoralal **0** ap**tINtOr ’**  **1iaMnScl** at **th8 tip0**  **d u8**  

### l Nb t, 

### although

h8 d BOt at that **till8 h&Ve**  **ft Olt**  **hi8 DOr8On.**  **bld8r I)0**  **IO&d Od**  **OOIl8tZUQtiOZh, hOWlOr,**  **aould SUOh**  **& ‘** **Or6Oll dOt8lld**  **th6 -**  

### chugs of not h a vin g l 

### oanmorafal **oDU&tOr ’** **8 lfoon88**  **by** 

### rmorlnuthat 

### ha 

### a14 haw a oha P ODiratori8 lli8n88. **P QU8On**  **80** oftar@d lruy **d8fOUd Oldy**  **upon** the 

### groundthat the offonrr with whloh ha **we8** 

### oharged **aOtUdlt** 18 UlltNO. It 18 the Opinion ai thlr departEont **that th8**  **OOJl8trUOtiOZi** ti1tth**you** hare 9laO.d upon the above q uo t ed

ltl o l a 18 aorraot. 

### Very truly ~ourlr

c
§ 1502.8 Ruling on objections and requests for hearing. ( a ) As soon as practicable, the Commission will review all objections and requests for hearing filed under § 1502.6 and determine— ( 1 ) Whether the regulation should be modified or revoked under § 1502.9; and
( 2 ) Whether a hearing has been justified.
( b ) A request for a hearing will be granted if the material submitted shows the following: ( 1 ) There is a genuine and substantial issue of fact for resolution at a hearing. A hearing will not be granted on issues of policy or law.
( 2 ) The factual issue can be resolved by available and specifically identified reliable evidence. A hearing will not be granted on the basis of mere allegations or denials or general descriptions of positions and contentions.
( 3 ) The data and information submitted, if established at a hearing, would be adequate to justify resolution of the factual issue in the way sought by the person. A hearing will be denied if the Commission concludes that the data and information submitted, even though accurate, are insufficient to justify the factual determination urged.
( 4 ) Resolution of the factual issue in the way sought by the person is adequate to justify the action requested. A hearing will not be granted on factual issues that are not determinative with respect to the action requested, e.g., if the Commission concludes that the Commission's action would be the same even if the factual issue were resolved in the way sought, or if a request is made that a final regulation include a provision not reasonably encompassed by the proposal.
( 5 ) The action requested is not inconsistent with any provision in the FHSA or any regulation in 16 CFR subchapter C explaining or particularizing the requirements of the FHSA.
( 6 ) The requirements in other applicable regulations, and in the notice promulgating the final regulation or the notice of opportunity for hearing are met.
( c ) In making the determinations specified in paragraph (a) of this section, the Commission may issue an appropriate order on the determinations without further notice or opportunity for comment from interested parties. However, the Commission, at its option, may use the procedure specified in 16 CFR part 1052 or any other applicable public procedure available to it.
( d ) If it is uncertain whether a hearing has been justified under the principles in paragraph (b) of this section, and the Commission concludes that summary decision against the person requesting a hearing should be considered, the Commission may serve upon the person by registered mail a proposed order denying a hearing. The person has 30 days after receipt of the proposed order to demonstrate that the submission justifies a hearing.
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I,Gerald J. Burnett, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the AnnualReport of Avistar Communications Corporation on Form 10-K for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents in allmaterial respects the financial condition and results of operations of AvistarCommunications Corporation.
|        | By:      | /s/ GERALD J. BURNETT                   |
|--------|----------|-----------------------------------------|
|   |     | Gerald J. Burnett                       |
|   | * * | *Chief  Executive Officer and Chairman* |
|   | * * | *(Principal  Executive Officer)*        |

 

I,Robert J. Habig, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the AnnualReport of Avistar Communications Corporation on Form 10-K for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents in allmaterial respects the financial condition and results of operations of AvistarCommunications Corporation.
|        | By:      | /s/ ROBERT J. HABIG                             |
|--------|----------|-------------------------------------------------|
|   |     | Robert J. Habig                                 |
|   | * * | *Chief  Financial Officer*                      |
|   | * * | *(Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer)* |

 

----
### §13293. Protection of proprietary information

#### (a) In general

In the case of activities, including joint venture activities, under this subchapter, and in the case of any existing or future activities, including joint venture activities, related primarily to battery technology for electric motor vehicles under other provisions of law, where the knowledge resulting from research and development activities conducted pursuant to such activities, including joint venture activities, is for the benefit of the participants (particularly domestic companies) that provide financial resources to a project under this subchapter, the Secretary, for a period of up to 5 years after the development of information that—

(1) results from research and development activities conducted under this subchapter; and

(2) would be a trade secret or commercial or financial information that is privileged or confidential if the information had been obtained from a participant,

shall, notwithstanding any other provision of law, provide appropriate protections against the dissemination of such information to the public, and the provisions of section 1905 of title 18 shall apply to such information. Nothing in this subsection provides protections against the dissemination of such information to Congress.

#### (b) "Domestic companies" defined

For purposes of subsection (a), the term "domestic companies" means entities which are substantially involved in the United States in the domestic production of motor vehicles for sale in the United States and have a substantial percentage of their production facilities in the United States.

(Pub. L. 102–486, title VI, §623, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2904.)
### SUBCHAPTER XI—OTHER MATTERS
No: III-14-009 March 21, 2014

CONTACT: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663

NRC Responded to an Alert at Fermi Nuclear Power Plant 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission responded to an Alert declared March 20, at 2:05 p.m. 

EDT at the Fermi Nuclear Generation Plant due to a small fire near the turbocharger of a diesel 

generator. The fire was quickly put out and the Alert was terminated at 3:32 p.m. 

The single-unit plant is operated by DTE Energy, and is located in Newport, Mich., about 25 

miles northeast of Toledo. 

The plant is currently shut down for a refueling outage and is in a stable condition. There was no 

radiation release and no impact to plant workers or the public. 

The NRC resident inspectors at the site are following the event in consultation with NRC staff at 

the NRC Region III Office in Lisle, Ill. 

Workers at the plant saw fire in the vicinity of the turbocharger, an air intake system, on one of 

station’s four diesel generators during routine testing. Plant workers were able to quickly extinguish the 

small fire. The other diesel generators were not affected. 

An Alert is the second lowest emergency level in the NRC’s emergency classification system. 

The NRC will review the circumstances surrounding the incident.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 9, 2020

Order 

Clerk

September 9, 2020

158240(95)

SUSAN BISIO,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

SC: 158240

v COA: 335422

Oakland CC: 2015-150462-CZ

THE CITY OF THE VILLAGE OF

CLARKSTON,

Defendant-Appellee.

_______________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellant to file a response to 

the joint answer of amici Michigan Municipal League, Michigan Townships Association, 

and Michigan Association of Municipal Attorneys to the motion for rehearing is

GRANTED. The response submitted on August 31, 2020, is accepted for filing.
#### § 240.15 Cost justification.

It is no defense to a charge of unlawful discrimination in the payment of an allowance or the furnishing of a service for a seller to show that such payment or service could be justified through savings in the cost of manufacture, sale or delivery.
FORM 10-Q CERTIFICATION

I, James N. Ryan, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 10-Q of PDC 2002-C Limited Partnership;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

	(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 7, 2003                
 /s/ James N. Ryan                                                   

James N. Ryan

Chief Executive Officer of Petroleum Development Corporation 

Managing General Partner of PDC 2002-C Limited Partnership
Exhibit 32.2

I, Mark D. Wolfe, Senior Vice
President Finance and Chief Financial Officer, of Pavilion Bancorp, Inc., certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 which this
               statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
               15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
               December 31, 2006 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
               condition and results of operations of Pavilion Bancorp, Inc.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 19, 2007

| |  | /s/ Mark D. Wolfe
Mark D. WolfeSenior Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
### §2103. Actions required of procurement officers when contacted regarding non-Federal employment

(a) Actions Required.—An agency official participating personally and substantially in a Federal agency procurement for a contract in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold who contacts or is contacted by a person that is a bidder or offeror in that Federal agency procurement regarding possible non-Federal employment for that official shall—

(1) promptly report the contact in writing to the official's supervisor and to the designated agency ethics official (or designee) of the agency in which the official is employed; and

(2)(A) reject the possibility of non-Federal employment; or

(B) disqualify himself or herself from further personal and substantial participation in that Federal agency procurement until the agency authorizes the official to resume participation in the procurement, in accordance with the requirements of section 208 of title 18 and applicable agency regulations on the grounds that—

(i) the person is no longer a bidder or offeror in that Federal agency procurement; or

(ii) all discussions with the bidder or offeror regarding possible non-Federal employment have terminated without an agreement or arrangement for employment.

(b) Retention of Reports.—The agency shall retain each report required by this section for not less than 2 years following the submission of the report. The reports shall be made available to the public on request, except that any part of a report that is exempt from the disclosure requirements of section 552 of title 5 under subsection (b)(1) of that section may be withheld from disclosure to the public.

(c) Persons Subject to Penalties.—The following are subject to the penalties and administrative actions set forth in section 2105 of this title:

(1) An official who knowingly fails to comply with the requirements of this section.

(2) A bidder or offeror that engages in employment discussions with an official who is subject to the restrictions of this section, knowing that the official has not complied with paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (a).

(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3728.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2103(a) | 41:423(c)(1). | Pub. L. 93–400, §27(c), as added Pub. L. 100–679, §6(a), Nov. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 4063; Pub. L. 101–189, title VIII, §814(a)–(d)(1), Nov. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 1495; Pub. L. 101–510, title XIV, §1484(l)(6), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1720; Pub. L. 102–25, title VII, §705(i), Apr. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 121; Pub. L. 103–355, title VIII, §8301(e), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3397; Pub. L. 104–106, title XLIII, §4304(a), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 660. |
| 2103(b) | 41:423(c)(2). | |
| 2103(c) | 41:423(c)(3), (4). | |

Section
#### § 1750.4 General requirements.

Household refrigerators shall be equipped with a device enabling the doors thereof to be opened easily from the inside, either by the application of an outwardly directed force to the inside of the door or by the rotation of a knob similar to a conventional doorknob. The device shall not render the refrigerator unsatisfactory for the preservation of food under any or all normal conditions of use.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas August 25, 2020 No. 04-20-00111-CR Victor ROMERO , Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 218th Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18-05-0132-CRA Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R The State’s motion for a 60-day extension of time to file its brief is GRANTED. It is ORDERED that the State’s brief is due no later than October 23, 2020.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 25th day of August, 2020.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-11-00001- CV
Conservative Republi cans of T exas, Appellant

v. Stephen Fr ost, Sand ra Elaine Haverlah, and Jam es P aul McKinion , Appellees
F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 419 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -F M- 09- 0001 55, H ONO RAB LE RHO NDA HURLEY , JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant Conservative Republicans of Texas filed a motion reque sting that th i s appea l be dismiss ed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a) (1). We g rant the motion and dismiss the appea l.

____________________________________ Diane M. H enson, Jus tice Be fore Chief Justice Jones, J ustices Henson a nd Goodwin Dismissed Filed: F ebrua

ry 3, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 227 (Friday, November 26, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 68969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26185]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Endangered and Threatened Species Permit Applications

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of receipt of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The following applicant has applied for a permit to conduct 
certain activities with endangered species. This notice is provided 
pursuant to section 10(c) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as 
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531, et seq.).

DATES: Written data or comments should be submitted to the Regional 
Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ecological Services, 1 
Federal Drive, Fort Snelling, Minnesota 55111-4056, and must be 
received on or before December 27, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Peter Fasbender, (612) 713-5343.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Permit Number: TE096410.
    Applicant: Thomas E. Tomasi, Southwest Missouri State University, 
Springfield, Missouri.
    The applicant requests a permit to take the Indiana bat (Myotis 
sodalis) throughout Missouri. The scientific research is aimed at 
enhancement of survival of the species in the wild.

    Dated: November 12, 2004
T.J. Miller,
Acting Assistant Regional Director, Ecological Services, Region 3, Fort 
Snelling, Minnesota.
[FR Doc. 04-26185 Filed 11-24-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
----

|   | (1) | the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| May 14, 2010 |                                                           |   |
|--------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|         | President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
|         |                                                           |   |
|         |                                                           |   |
| May 14, 2010 |                                                           |   |
|         | Principal Accounting Officer and Chief Operating Officer       |

----