alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §12374. Conference committees

#### (a) Advisory committee

The Secretary shall establish an advisory committee to the Conference which shall include representatives from the Federal Council on Children, Youth, and Families, public agencies and nonprofit private organizations as appropriate.

#### (b) Other committees

The Secretary may establish such other committees, including technical committees, as may be necessary to assist in the planning, conducting, and reviewing of the Conference.

#### (c) Composition of committees

Each committee established under this section shall be composed of professionals and public members, and shall include individuals from low-income families and from minority groups.

#### (d) Compensation

Members of any committee established under this section (other than any officers or employees of the Federal Government), while attending conferences or meetings of the committee or otherwise serving at the request of the Secretary, shall be entitled to receive compensation at a rate to be fixed by the Secretary, but not to exceed the daily rate payable for GS–18 of the General Schedule under section 5332 of title 5 (including travel time). While away from their homes or regular places of business, such members may be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, as authorized under section 5703 of such title for persons employed intermittently in Federal Government service.

(Pub. L. 101–501, title IX, §985, Nov. 3, 1990, 104 Stat. 1282.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1990, see section 1001(a) of Pub. L. 101–501, set out as an Effective Date of 1990 Amendment note under section 8621 of this title.

#### Termination of Advisory Committees

Advisory committees established after Jan. 5, 1973, to terminate not later than the expiration of the 2-year period beginning on the date of their establishment, unless, in the case of a committee established by the President or an officer of the Federal Government, such committee is renewed by appropriate action prior to the expiration of such 2-year period, or in the case of a committee established by Congress, its duration is otherwise provided by law. See section 1013 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### References in Other Laws to GS–16, 17, or 18 Pay Rates

References in laws to the rates of pay for GS–16, 17, or 18, or to maximum rates of pay under the General Schedule, to be considered references to rates payable under specified sections of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, see section 529 [title I, §101(c)(1)] of Pub. L. 101–509, set out in a note under section 5376 of Title 5.
No: II-15-036 May 11, 2015

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416 

NRC Schedules Open House May 21 to Discuss

2014 Assessment of Harris Nuclear Power Plant

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials have scheduled an open house for May 21 to provide 

information and answer questions about the NRC assessment of the Harris nuclear power plant during 2014. 

The Harris plant, which is operated by Duke Energy, is located near New Hill, N.C., about 20 miles 

southwest of Raleigh.

The informal open house is scheduled from 5 to 6:30 p.m. in the Holly Springs Cultural Center, 300 

West Ballantine St. in Holly Springs. There will be informational posters and NRC staff will be available to 

answer questions about the safety of the Harris plant as well as overall NRC oversight and inspection. 

Overall, the NRC staff concluded that the Harris plant operated safely in 2014, and the plant will 

continue to receive the detailed routine or baseline inspections conducted at all nuclear power plants.

“NRC inspectors continually evaluate each nuclear plant’s safety, and each year we take a detailed look 

at that information to identify any trends and help plan future inspections,” said NRC Region II Administrator 

Victor McCree. “Inspection results are available throughout the year, but these open houses allow us to talk to 

local residents and answer any questions they may have.”

Routine inspections are carried out by the NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant and by 

inspection specialists from the Region II office in Atlanta.

The annual assessment letter for the Harris plant, as well as current performance information is 

available on the NRC website.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Medina  International  Corp.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending March 31, 2005,  as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Bradley Colby, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Bradley Colby
-----------------------
Bradley Colby
Chief Executive Officer




<PAGE>
No: III-13-037 September 9, 2013

CONTACT: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663

NRC Issues $1,000 Fine and Confirmatory Order 

to a Cardiology Practice

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued a $1,000 civil penalty and confirmatory 

order to the Bradley D. Bastow cardiology practice in South Haven, Mich., for violations in the safe use 

of radioactive material.

The violations were identified during an NRC special inspection and an investigation looking 

into the handling of radioactive material used for diagnostic medical tests. The NRC staff concluded that 

the company failed to adhere to certain NRC safety requirements which include conducting appropriate

contamination surveys; making sure survey instruments are properly calibrated; conducting regular 

inventories of sealed radioactive sources; keeping accurate records; and keeping accurate and complete 

records.

“Even though these violations did not result in harm to medical staff or patients, our action 

underscores the expectation that NRC license holders will adhere to NRC requirements to make sure 

nuclear material is used safely,” said NRC Region III Administrator Cynthia D. Pederson. 

The confirmatory order and the $1,000 fine were issued as a result of the Alternative Dispute 

Resolution process, which uses a mediator to assist the NRC and a licensee to reach an agreement when 

there are differences regarding an enforcement action. The company agreed to abide by the conditions of the 

order requiring a number of actions to ensure the NRC’s concerns will be addressed. Some of the 

commitments include: making sure all equipment listed on the NRC license is calibrated and operable; 

having the company’s radiation safety officer complete medical radiation safety officer refresher training; 

increasing the frequency of radiation safety program reviews; making sure everyone involved in NRCregulated activities at the office understands NRC safety requirements and feels free to raise safety concerns; 

and making sure that the documentation of NRC-regulated activities, including those required by the 

confirmatory order, is complete, accurate and clear.

The medical practice agreed to address these issues according to the timelines established in the order 

and to notify the NRC in writing upon completion of specific actions.

The NRC’s confirmatory order, inspection report and choice letter summarizing the results of the 

NRC’s investigation are available on the NRC's website .
§ 1702.15 Petitions alleging the incompatibility of child resistant packaging with the particular substance petitioned for exemption. ( a ) Where the petition for an exemption is based upon an allegation that the applicable special packaging standard is incompatible with the particular substance or would seriously and adversely compromise the utility or stability of a substance, the petitioner shall submit adequate evidence to support the allegation.
( b ) If the allegation of incompatibility is based upon the fact that package choice is limited by a new drug application filed with the FDA, the petition shall state the limitation of package choice and a description of a time schedule to revise the NDA in order to allow additional package choice.
( c ) If the allegation of incompatibility is based upon the fact that the shelf life of the product limits package choice, the petition shall outline the particular limitation and shall include a description of a time schedule to re-establish shelf-life data.
B.C.D. 00-39 SEP 1 9 2000

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION 

Maryland and Pennsylvania Railroad Company

Yorkrail, Inc.

York Railway Company

Maryland and Pennsylvania Railroad Company, LLC

Yorkrail, LLC

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning the

status of Maryland and Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Yorkrail, Inc., York

Railway Company, Maryland and Pennsylvania Railroad Company, LLC, and

Yorkrail, LLC, as employers under the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231

et seg.) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. § 351 et seq.).

Information regarding these companies was provided by Ann Wileczek, Vice 

President, Human Resources, York Railway Company, and was also obtained

from Surface Transportation Board Finance Docket No. 33815. On December 1,

1999, Yorkrail, Inc., and Maryland and Pennsylvania Railroad Company,

employers under the Acts (BA. Nos. 2351 and 2314, respectively) were merged

into a new company, York Railway Company. That company took over the rail

operations previously performed by Yorkrail, Inc., and Maryland and

Pennsylvania Railroad Company. However, assets of those two companies

were transferred to two new companies, Yorkrail, LLC, and Maryland and

Pennsylvania Railroad Company, LLC. These two new companies are

subsidiaries of York Railway Company and have no employees and perform no

operations. The Surface Transportation Board stated that they will “assume

common carrier status by virtue of the ownership of the underlying rail assets

that [York Railway Company] will operate.”

The evidence of record establishes that York Railway Company and its two

subsidiaries, Yorkrail, LLC, and Maryland and Pennsylvania Railroad

Company, LLC, are carriers subject to the jurisdiction of the Surface

Transportation Board. Accordingly, it is determined that they are employers

within the meaning of section l(aXl)(i) of the Railroad Retirement Act (45

U.S.C. § 231(aXlXi)) and the corresponding provision of the Railroad

Unemployment Insurance Act as of December 1, 1999, the date as of which

BA# 2351

.3
-2-

Maryland and Pennsylvania Railroad Company

Yorkrail, Inc.

York Railway Company

Maryland and Pennsylvania Railroad Company, LLC

Yorkrail, LLC

operations were commenced. The status ofYorkrail, Inc., and Maryland and

Pennsylvania Railroad Company as employers under the Acts is terminated as

of the same date.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-14-0114 - Sixth 6-Month Status Update on Response to Lessons Learned from Japan's March 11, 2011, Great Tohoku Earthquake and Subsequent Tsunami

Accession Number: ML14234A498

Date Released: Wednesday, November 5, 2014

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML14234A496 - SECY-14-0114 - Sixth 6-Month Status Update on Response to Lessons Learned from Japan's March 11, 2011, Great Tohoku Earthquake and Subsequent Tsunami (6 page(s), 10/21/2014)
    - ML14234A499 - SECY-14-0114:  Enclosure 1 - Update on Tier 1 Activities (12 page(s), 10/21/2014)
    - ML14234A504 - SECY-14-0114:  Enclosure 2 - Update on Tier 2 Activities (2 page(s), 10/21/2014)
    - ML14234A506 - SECY-14-0114:  Enclosure 3 - Update on Tier 3 Activities (7 page(s), 10/21/2014)
    - ML14234A507 - SECY-14-0114:  Enclosure 4 - Update on Activities Not Within a Tier (5 page(s), 10/21/2014)
    - ML14234A509 - SECY-14-0114:  Enclosure 5 - Overview of Fukushima-Related Recommendations and Related Activities (14 page(s), 10/21/2014)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
No: 13-069 August 21, 2013

CONTACT: 301-415-8200 

Statement of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission 

on the Office of Inspector General Audit of Environmental Reviews

The NRC appreciates the Office of the Inspector General’s (OIG) audit of the agency’s process 

for environmental reviews in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The 

OIG conducted the audit in response to the NRC staff’s proactive recommendation that it examine 

whether the NRC has conducted its environmental reviews efficiently and effectively in accordance 

with the agency’s mission.

The agency is and has been in full compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 

1969 and the NRC’s implementing regulations when preparing Environmental Impact Statements and 

Supplemental Environmental Impact Statements.

Nevertheless, protecting public health and safety and the environment are cornerstones of the 

NRC’s mission. Adequate, transparent environmental reviews under NEPA are important to the NRC in 

fulfilling this mission. The agency will therefore carefully review the OIG’s recommendations and 

consider whether any enhancements are needed to regulations, guidance, and/or staff practice that 

might further strengthen the agency’s environmental review process, and maintain public trust in the 

NRC.
#### § 0.3 Hours.

Principal and regional offices are open from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., except on Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays.

[86 FR 38545, July 22, 2021]
§ 1500.44 Method for determining extremely flammable and flammable solids. ( a ) *Preparation of samples* — ( 1 ) *Granules, powders, and pastes.* Pack the sample into a flat, rectangular metal boat with inner dimensions 6 inches long × 1 inch wide × one-fourth inch deep.
( 2 ) *Rigid and pliable solids.* Measure the dimensions of the sample and support it by means of metal ringstands, clamps, rings, or other suitable devices as needed, so that the major axis is oriented horizontally and the maximum surface is freely exposed to the atmosphere.
( b ) *Procedure.* Place the prepared sample in a draft-free area that can be ventilated and cleared after each test. The temperature of the sample at the time of testing shall be between 68 °F. and 86 °F. Hold a burning paraffin candle whose diameter is at least 1 inch, so that the flame is in contact with the surface of the sample at the end of the major axis for 5 seconds or until the sample ignites, whichever is less. Remove the candle. By means of a stopwatch, determine the time of combustion with self-sustained flame. Do not exceed 60 seconds. Extinguish flame with a CO2 or similar nondestructive type extinguisher. Measure the dimensions of the burnt area and calculate the rate of burning along the major axis of the sample.
§ 1213.1 Scope, application, and effective date. ( a ) *Scope, basis, and purpose.* This part 1213, a consumer product safety standard, prescribes requirements for bunk beds to reduce or eliminate the risk that children will die or be injured from being trapped between the upper bunk and the wall, in openings below guardrails, or in other structures in the bed.
( b ) *Application and effective date.* The standard in this part applies to all bunk beds, except those manufactured only for institutional use, that are manufactured in the United States, or imported, on or after June 19, 2000. (Facilities intended for use by children under age 6 are not considered to be institutions.) Bunk beds intended for use by children are subject to the requirements in 16 CFR 1500.18(a)(18) and 16 CFR part 1513, and not to this part 1213. However, those regulations are substantively identical to the requirements in this part 1213.
Exhibit 13.1
**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT****Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**
     In connection with the Annual Report of Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. (the“Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the SEC on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Chi Wen Tsai, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,to the best of my knowledge, that:
     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and
     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: June 10, 2005      By:     /s/ Chi Wen Tsai      Name: Chi Wen Tsai  Title:   Chief Executive Officer
* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe SEC or its staff upon request.
### SUBCHAPTER XIII—RECONVERSION UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS FOR SEAMEN
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Gerald J.Burnett, certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-K of Avistar CommunicationsCorporation;

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.                 Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)               Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)              Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)               Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

a)               All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)              Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: March 28,  2005      |
|---------------------------------|
| /s/ GERALD J. BURNETT           |   |
| Gerald J. Burnett               |
| *Chief Executive Officer*       |
| *(Principal Executive Officer)* |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Longwei Petroleum Investment
Holding Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2008
(the "Report"), I, Cai Yongjun, Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15
> (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
> respects, the Company's financial position and results of
> operations.

/s/Cai YongjunCai
Yongjun, Principal Executive Officer

September 30, 2008
##### 



Exhibit 21.1
 SUBSIDIARIES
 Name:
    
    
    
    Jurisdiction of Organization1.
    
    Endeavour Operating Corporation,
    formerly NSNV, Inc.
    
    Delaware2.
    
    Endeavour Energy UK Limited
    
    England and Wales3.
    
    Endeavour Energy Norge AS
    
    Norway4.
    
    Endeavour Energy Netherlands B.V.
    
    The Netherlands5.
    
    Endeavour International Holding B.V.
    
    The Netherlands6.
    
    END Operating Management Company
    
    Delaware7.
    
    END Management Company
    
    Delaware
|                       |
|-----------------------|
|                       |  |  |
| January 23, 2015 | By | /s/ DAVID J. FALLON |
| (Date)                |   | David J. Fallon |
|                  |   | Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer |
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20 - 0192

_________________ IN THE MATTER OF: C.H., N.H. and M.H.,

Youths in Need of Care. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this caus e is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the Honorable Elizabeth Best, District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 9 2020

09/09/2020