alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Leonard F. Levy et al., Appellants, against Charles H. Griffiths, as Surrogate of Westchester County, or Any Person Acting as Surrogate of Westchester County, Respondent.

In this proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, the petitioners sought an order in the nature of mandamus to direct the Surrogate of Westchester County to make and enter a decree as proposed by them. The appeal is by petitioners from an order dismissing the proceeding. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The Surrogate, in entering a decree on the order of this court, “ that the assignees be paid the respective amounts of their assignments *with interest,”*computed the interest at 3%. This was proper. Section 218 of the Surrogate’s Court Act provides that interest shall be computed at 3% unless delay in payment was unreasonable. There has been no such finding. (See *Matter of Fromberg,*281 App. Div. 1.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, Schmidt and Beldoek, JJ.
EXHIBIT 31.1

     CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Steve Careaga, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Nannaco, Inc.
("registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

April 14, 2005

/s/ Steve Careaga
-----------------
Steve Careaga
Principal Executive Officer


                                      E-1
Exhibit
10.1


AMENDMENT TO


VEECO INSTRUMENTS INC.


AMENDED AND RESTATED


2000 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


 


 


                Effective
April 18, 2007, Section 5(d) of the Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated
2000 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), is amended to read, in its entirety, as
follows:


 


                  (d)           Subject to Section 10, (i) no person may be granted
Options under the Plan during any calendar year with respect to more than
300,000 shares of Stock; and (ii) no person may be granted Restricted
Stock and Restricted Stock Units under the Plan during any calendar year with
respect to more than 200,000 shares of Stock in the aggregate;  and
No: 15-055 September 8, 2015

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200

NRC Ends Work on National Academy of Sciences 

Cancer Risk Pilot Study

The NRC is ceasing work on a National Academy of Sciences (NAS) pilot study (Phase 1 and 

Phase 2) of cancer risks in populations near U.S. nuclear power facilities. The NRC determined that 

continuing the work was impractical, given the significant amount of time and resources needed and the 

agency’s current budget constraints.

The NRC continues to find U.S. nuclear power plants comply with strict requirements that 

limit radiation releases from routine operations. The NRC and state agencies regularly analyze 

environmental samples from near the plants. These analyses show the releases, when they occur, are 

too small to cause observable increases in cancer risk near the facilities.

“We’re balancing the desire to provide updated answers on cancer risk with our responsibility to 

use Congressionally-provided funds as wisely as possible,” said Brian Sheron, director of the NRC’s 

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research. “The NAS estimates it would be at least the end of the decade 

before they would possibly have answers for us, and the costs of completing the study were

prohibitively high.”
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Review of Research Program Projects (P01).                    

*Date:*                         December 14, 2004.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Double Tree Rockville, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Yan Z. Wang, PhD, MD, Scientific Review Administrator, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 820, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-4957.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 18, 2004.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-26245  Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
No: II-15-031 April 21, 2015

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

 Joey Ledford 404-997-4416 

NRC Schedules Open House April 29 to Discuss Agency’s 

2014 Assessment of North Anna Nuclear Station

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials have scheduled an open house for April 29 to provide 

information on the agency’s assessment of the two units at the North Anna nuclear plant during 2014. 

The informal open house is scheduled from 5 to 6 p.m. in the Town of Mineral Municipal 

Building, 312 Mineral Ave., Mineral, Va. There will be informational posters and NRC staff will be 

available to answer questions about the safety performance of the North Anna plant as well as overall 

NRC oversight and inspection.

The North Anna plant, which is operated by Dominion, is located near Mineral, 40 miles 

northwest of Richmond.

Overall, the NRC staff concluded that North Anna Units 1 and 2 operated safely in 2014, and 

the plant will continue to receive the detailed routine or baseline inspections conducted at all nuclear 

power plants.

“NRC inspectors continually evaluate each nuclear plant’s safety, and each year we take a 

detailed look at that information to identify any trends and help plan future inspections,” said 

NRC Region II Administrator Victor McCree. “Inspection results are available throughout the year, but 

these annual meetings allow us to talk to local residents and answer any questions they may have.”

Routine inspections are carried out by the NRC resident inspectors assigned to the plant and by 

inspection specialists from the Region II office in Atlanta.

The annual assessment letter for the North Anna plant, as well as current performance 

information for Unit 1 and Unit 2 is available on the NRC website.
Exhibit 32

Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, James N. Ryan, the Chief Executive Officer of Petroleum Development Corporation, the managing general partner of PDC 2002-B Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"),  hereby certify that: 

- I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Partnership (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;
- the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

_  _/s/ James N. Ryan                                

Name: James N. Ryan

Title: Chief Executive Officer

Date: ___August 7, 2003_________
### Part B—Health Professions Training for Diversity
From: "McWilliams, Douglas A." < Douglas.McWilliams@squiresanders.com > To: William Wagner/R5/USEPA/US@EPA, Steven Rosenthal/R 5/USEPA/US@EPA, Douglas Aburano/R5/USEPA/US@EPA,
Cc: "Michael Long ( Michael.Long@CliffsNR.com )" < Michael.Long@CliffsNR.com > Date: 11/27/2012 05:26 PM Subject: Approved BART aggregate mass limit at PH Glatfelter

Bill, Steve and Doug,

Thank you for your time this afternoon. Attached are the two documents that we discussed in support of Cliffs’ request for an aggregate SO2 limit across Units 1 and 2 at the United T aconite facility.

On July 2, 2012, EPA approved the Ohio regional haze SI P for PH Glatfelter, a paper company that operates two coal fired boilers (See attached FR Notice). The approved SIP includ ed a BART alternative limit for the two boilers combined. The approved SIP establishe s a combined daily SO2 limit of 24,930 pounds per day for boilers 7 and 8, which is one pound per day less than the sum of the individual BART limits for each boiler. See SIP Submittal at page 26:

“Controlling both boilers at 90 percent would have resulted in limiting SO2 emissions to 24,931 pounds per day. Under this alternative the boi lers will be limited to emitting 24,930 pounds per day. There is also the cobenefit of additional reductions of NOx and PM2.5 if Gl atfelter chooses to permanently shut down a boiler.”

Compliance with the daily mass limit will be demonstrated on a 30-day rolling average basis. Curtailment or shutdown were deemed appropriate strategies for comp liance that would produce the additional benefit of NOx

and PM2.5 reductions.

Applying this approach to UTAC, C liffs’ individual proposed BART SO2 limits are 155 lbs/hour for Unit 1 and 374 lbs/hour for Unit 2. Converted to daily limits (x24): Line 1= 3,720 lbs/day and Line 2= 8,976 lbs/day for an aggregate daily limit of 12,696 lbs SO2/day. The alternate BART limit w ould be 12,695 lbs SO2/day demonstrated on a rolling 30-day basis using CEMs.

Please let us know if you have any questions,

Douglas A. McWilliams

Partner douglas.mcwilliams@squiresanders.com

T +1 216 479 8332

O +1 216 479 8500

F +1 216 479 8780

M +1 216 407 4968

Squire Sanders (US) LLP 4900 Key Tower 127 Public Square Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1304 www.squiresanders.com

------------------ ------------------ ----------------- ---------------- 37 Offices in 18 CountriesThis message is confidential and may be legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. I f you are not the intended recipient, please telephone or email the sender and delete this message and any attachment from your syste m; you must not copy or disclose the contents of this message or any attachment to any other person.Squire Sanders (US) LLP is part of the international legal practice Squire Sanders which operates worl dwide through a number of separate legal entities. Please visit www.squiresanders.com for more information.#US

------------------ ------------------ ----------------- ---------------- (See attached file: SIP submittal.pdf)(See attached file: 2012-07-02 FR notice.pdf)
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3501 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3501

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 125 Kerr Avenue in Rome City, Indiana, as the ``SPC Nicholas Scott 
                         Hartge Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPC NICHOLAS SCOTT HARTGE POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 125 Kerr Avenue in Rome City, Indiana, shall be known and 
designated as the ``SPC Nicholas Scott Hartge Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``SPC 
Nicholas Scott Hartge Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 28, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3501

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 125 Kerr Avenue in Rome City, Indiana, as the ``SPC Nicholas Scott 
                         Hartge Post Office''.
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-10610

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CHRISTOPHER LEE BAILEY,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:09-CR-67-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Christopher Lee Bailey has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Bailey has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief 

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 22, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-10610 Document: 00513810699 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/22/2016
No. 16-10610

2

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-10610 Document: 00513810699 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/22/2016
§ 930.66 Supplemental coordination for proposed activities. ( a ) For federal license or permit proposed activities that were previously determined by the State agency to be consistent with the management program, but which have not yet begun, applicants shall further coordinate with the State agency and prepare a supplemental consistency certification if the proposed activity will affect any coastal use or resource substantially different than originally described. Substantially different coastal effects are reasonably foreseeable if: ( 1 ) The applicant makes substantial changes in the proposed activity that are relevant to management program enforceable policies; or
( 2 ) There are significant new circumstances or information relevant to the proposed activity and the proposed activity's effect on any coastal use or resource.
( 3 ) Substantial changes were made to the activity during the period of the State agency's initial review and the State agency did not receive notice of the substantial changes during its review period, and these changes are relevant to management program enforceable policies and/or affect coastal uses or resources.
( b ) The State agency may notify the applicant, the Federal agency and the Director of proposed activities which the State agency believes should be subject to supplemental coordination. The State agency's notification shall include information supporting a finding of substantially different coastal effects than originally described and the relevant enforceable policies, and may recommend modifications to the proposed activity (if any) that would allow the applicant to implement the proposed activity consistent with the management program. State agency notification under subsection (b) does not remove the requirement under subsection (a) for applicants to notify State agencies.
[65 FR 77154, Dec. 8, 2000, as amended at 71 FR 828, Jan. 5, 2006]
### **CHAPTER 60—COMPREHENSIVE ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM PREVENTION, TREATMENT, AND REHABILITATION PROGRAM**

Sec.
4541.
Congressional findings and declaration of purpose.
4542.
Congressional declaration for utilization of programs under other Federal laws in fields of health and social services.

#### SUBCHAPTER I—NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON, AND INTERAGENCY COMMITTEE ON FEDERAL ACTIVITIES FOR, ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM; REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

4551 to 4553. Repealed or Transferred.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM PREVENTION, TREATMENT, AND REHABILITATION PROGRAMS FOR GOVERNMENT AND OTHER EMPLOYEES

4561.
Transferred.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AND FEDERAL GRANTS AND CONTRACTS

#### Part A—Technical Assistance

4571 to 4574. Repealed or Transferred.

#### Part B—Implementation and Project Grants and Contracts

4576.
Repealed.
4577.
Grants and contracts for demonstration of new and more effective drug and alcohol abuse prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation programs.
4578.
Authorizations of appropriations.

#### Part C—Admission to Hospitals and Outpatient Facilities; Confidentiality of Records

4581, 4582. Transferred.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—RESEARCH

4585 to 4588. Repealed or Transferred.

#### SUBCHAPTER V—GENERAL PROVISIONS

4591.
Separability.
4592.
Recordkeeping for audit.
4593.
Payments.
4594.
Contract authority in appropriation Acts.
§ 1014.4 Requirements for identification of individuals making requests. The following proof of identity is required for requests for records made pursuant to § 1014.3: ( a ) An individual seeking a record about himself or herself in person may establish his or her identity by the presentation of a single document bearing a photograph (such as a passport or driver's license) or by a presentation of two items of identification which do not bear a photograph but do bear both a name and address. An individual who cannot provide documentation of his or her identity may provide a written statement affirming his or her identity and the fact that he or she understands the penalties for making false statements (18 U.S.C. 1001 and 5 U.S.C. 552a(i)(3)).
( b ) An individual seeking a record by mail shall include a statement signed by the individual and properly notarized, that he or she appeared before a notary public and submitted proof of identity acceptable to the notary public.
( c ) Requests made by an agent, parent, or guardian shall, in addition to establishing the identity of the minor or other person he or she represents as required by paragraphs (a) and (b), establish his or her agency, parentage, or guardianship by documentation.
( d ) In any case in which the Commission determines that the proof of identity is not adequate, it may request the individual to submit additional proof of identity.
### §8504. Procurement requirements for the Federal Government

(a) In General.—An entity of the Federal Government intending to procure a product or service on the procurement list referred to in section 8503 of this title shall procure the product or service from a qualified nonprofit agency for the blind or a qualified nonprofit agency for other severely disabled in accordance with regulations of the Committee and at the price the Committee establishes if the product or service is available within the period required by the entity.

(b) Exception.—This section does not apply to the procurement of a product that is available from an industry established under chapter 307 of title 18 and that is required under section 4124 of title 18 to be procured from that industry.

(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3837.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8504 | 41:48. | June 25, 1938, ch. 697, §3, 52 Stat. 1196; Pub. L. 92–28, §1, June 23, 1971, 85 Stat. 80. |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "referred to in section 8503 of this title" are added for clarity because of the restatement of 41:47(a) in section 8503(a) of the revised title.

In subsection (b), the words "for procurement" are omitted as unnecessary.