alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

July 25, 2011 

y0718 

Order 

 

July 25, 2011 

143041 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 143041 

 COA: 296050 

Wayne CC: 09-021522-FH 

KYLE J. AMES DONAHEE, a/k/a KYLE JAMES 

DONAHEE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 17, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
129402 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 129402 COA: 253946 Oakland CC: 2003-188872-FC ROBERT MANDEL VanCLEAVE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the May 12, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0123 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 30, 2006

Clerk
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3422 

To require the Secretary of Defense to transfer at least 10 percent of 

certain military equipment returning from Iraq to Federal and State agencies. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 15, 2011 

Mr. POE of Texas (for himself and Mr. CARTER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Defense to transfer at least 

10 percent of certain military equipment returning from 

Iraq to Federal and State agencies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Send Equipment for 

5 National Defense Act’’ or the ‘‘SEND Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TRANSFER OF USED MILITARY EQUIPMENT TO 

7 STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after eli9 gible equipment returns to the United States from Iraq, 

10 and in accordance with subsections (b) and (c) of section 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3422 IH

1 2576a of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of 

2 Defense shall transfer at least 10 percent of such eligible 

3 equipment to Federal and State agencies. 

4 (b) PREFERENCE.—In considering applications for 

5 the transfer of eligible equipment, the Secretary shall give 

6 preference to Federal and State agencies that will use the 

7 eligible equipment primarily for the purpose of strength8 ening border security along the southern border of the 

9 United States. 

10 (c) WAIVER.—The Secretary may waive the require11 ment under subsection (a) with respect to eligible equip12 ment that the Secretary determines the Department of 

13 Defense needs for immediate use, if the Secretary certifies 

14 such determination to Congress. 

15 (d) ELIGIBLE EQUIPMENT DEFINED.—In this sec16 tion, the term ‘‘eligible equipment’’ means equipment that 

17 the Secretary determines would be suitable for use by Fed18 eral and State agencies in law enforcement activities, in19 cluding— 

20 (1) surveillance unmanned aerial vehicles, in21 cluding the MQ–9 Reaper (also known as the ‘‘Pred22 ator B’’); 

23 (2) night-vision goggles; and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3422 IH

1 (3) high mobility multi-purpose wheel vehicles 

2 (commonly known as ‘‘humvees’’). 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Abe Weinstein, Respondent, v. Rosemary T. Weinstein, Appellant.

*895Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Vaughan and Piper, JJ. [See *post,*p. 997.]
### Part H—International Cooperation
Exhibit 4.1  



	NUMBER

  

2	 	[PICTURE]

  

KHI Parent Inc.	 	SHARES
	
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

60,000,000 SHARES COMMON STOCK

Par Value $0.01 Per Share
	

This Certifies that	
 	

 
	

 	
 	

SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS	
 	

 
	

is the owner of	
 	

 




the Common Stock of KHI Parent Inc. 


Shares
of full paid and nonassessable transferable only on the books of the Corporation in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. 


In
Witness Whereof, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers and its Corporate Seal to be hereunto affixed
this                        day of
            A.D.            



	    
 SECRETARY	 	[SEAL]	 	    
 PRESIDENT










        The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to
applicable laws or regulations: 



	TEN COM	—	 	as tenants in common	 	 	 	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT	—	 	
	 	Custodian	 	

	TEN ENT	—	 	as tenants by the entireties	 	 	 	 	 	 	(Cust)	 	 	 	(Minor)
	JT TEN	—	 	as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common	 	 	 	 	 	 	 

under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act	 	    
 (State)




Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list 


        For Value Received,
                                         
                                          
                                 hereby sell, assign and transfer unto
 



	PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE


    
	 	 	 	 	 
	

    






Shares represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and
appoint                            Attorney to transfer the said Shares on the books
of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. 



	

Dated	
 	

    
  

In presence of	
 	

 
	 	 	 	 	

	

 	
 	
 	
 	

NOTICE. THE SIGNATURE OF THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT

OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**Certification      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted**

**Pursuant      to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

| Dated:              November 18, 2007                                                                                       |   |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                                                        |   |   |   |   |
| /s/                Gary                Musselman                                                                            |   |   |   |   |
| Gary                Musselman,                President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial                Officer |   |   |   |   |
|                                                                                                                        |   |   |   |   |
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3477 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 133 Hare Road in Crosby, Texas, as the 

Army First Sergeant David McNerney Post Office Building. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3477 EH

1 SECTION 1. ARMY FIRST SERGEANT DAVID MCNERNEY 

2 POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 133 Hare Road in Crosby, Texas, 

5 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Army First Ser6 geant David McNerney Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Army First Sergeant 

11 David McNerney Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 23, 2012. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3477 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostMcNerney Post Office Building. Texas, as the Army First Sergeant David al Service located at 133 Hare Road in Crosby,
# Official Journal C 361A/27 O

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 361A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6327 October 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 361A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6327 October 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Public Prosecutor’s Office |
| 2020/C 361 A/01 | Vacancy Notice — Administrative Director (EPPO/AD/2020/004) | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Public Prosecutor’s Office

2020/C 361 A/01

Vacancy Notice — Administrative Director (EPPO/AD/2020/004)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
### SUBCHAPTER VIII—LOCAL ASSISTANCE
#### In the Matter of Donald D. Voorhees, Appellant, against Spencer E. Bates et al., Constituting the State Tax Commission, Respondents.

Proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a final determination of the State Tax Commission which affirmed an assessment of an unincorporated business tax against petitioner for the year 1941. The work engaged in by petitioner was described by him as that of orchestral conductor or musical director. During the year involved petitioner acted as an orchestra conductor on two radio programs, one known as the “ Cavalcade of America ” sponsored by E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, and the other known as the *“*Telephone Hour ” sponsored by the American Telephone & Telegraph Company. Petitioner claims exemption from the unincorporated business tax on the ground (1) that he was an employee, and (2) that he is practicing a profession and derives more than 80% of his gross income from personal services. The record does not support his contention that he was an employee. The second contention is likewise without merit. Petitioner is a musician with extensive education and experience. He contends that he was merely paid a fee for his services as conductor of an orchestra. There is substantial evidence in the record, however, that he was engaged in the business of selling two complete weekly radio programs which involved many elements beyond his services as conductor. Among many other things, he hired and paid the musicians in one orchestra. The entire cost was paid to him and he in turn paid the musicians; he spent money and effort in promotional work, advertising and similar activities. The record would justify a finding that he was engaged in selling a *“*package ” to wit: the entire weekly radio program, of which his services as conductor were only a part. In any event, from this record we may not say as a matter of law that the determination of the Tax Commission was without substantial evidence to support it. *(Matter of Engelhardt*v. *Bates,*281 App. Div. 1053.) Determination unanimously confirmed, with $50 costs. Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Imrie, JJ. [See 283 App. Div. 677.]
### SUBCHAPTER I—PROJECTS GENERALLY
§ 923.12 Uses of regional benefit. The management program must contain a method of assuring that local land use and water use regulations within the coastal zone do not unreasonably restrict or exclude land uses and water uses of regional benefit. To this end, the management program must: ( a ) Identify what constitutes uses of regional benefit; and
( b ) Identify and utilize any one or a combination of methods, consistent with the control techniques employed by the State, to assure local land and water use regulations do not unreasonably restrict or exclude uses of regional benefit.
[61 FR 33806, June 28, 1996; 61 FR 36965, July 15, 1996]
No: II-13-031 May 7, 2013

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416

NRC Issues Confirmatory Order to Farley Nuclear Power Plant 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a confirmatory order to Southern Nuclear 

Operating Co.’s Farley nuclear power plant, which has agreed to a series of corrective actions related to 

the company’s failure to ensure that radiation worker training exams for security officers were not 

compromised. The Farley plant is located near Columbia, Ala., 18 miles south of Dothan.

The order stems from a settlement achieved under the NRC’s Alternative Dispute Resolution 

process, which was initiated at the request of Southern Nuclear to address an apparent violation that 

occurred in 2010 and 2011. That violation involved a Farley security officer helping other security 

officers during radiation worker training exams or actually taking the exam for them. 

The NRC’s ADR process refers to mediation facilitated by a neutral third party with no 

decision-making authority who assists the NRC and a licensee in reaching an agreement when there are

differences regarding an enforcement action. 

A mediation session between the NRC staff and Southern Nuclear was held on March 15 and a 

settlement was reached. A confirmatory order, issued on May 6, outlines the corrective actions and

steps Southern Nuclear has agreed to take to address the violation. 

Those steps include fleet-wide actions such as evaluating the testing environment and 

compliance with applicable training procedures at corporate and operating sites, communicating 

messages throughout the fleet regarding willful misconduct and its incompatibility with safe nuclear 

construction and operations as well as holding a fleet-wide stand-down to address and discuss integrity 

and trustworthiness. Southern Nuclear has also committed to conducting an effectiveness review of all 

actions taken under the confirmatory order, and evaluating and implementing actions to reinforce

communications involving willful misconduct, integrity and trustworthiness annually until 2015. 

“This demonstrates that the ADR process can work effectively to achieve not only compliance 

with NRC requirements, but corrective actions that go beyond those the agency may get through the 

traditional enforcement process,” said NRC Region II Regional Administrator Victor McCree. “Those

results can be broader and help ensure that similar events do not happen in the future.”

The confirmatory order is currently available by contacting the Region II Office of Public 

Affairs using the information above and will soon be available on the NRC website.
#### Howard D. Hammond, Respondent, v. Arthur Douglas Constant, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Carr, J., voted to reverse.
### [§429. Renumbered §489]
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL**

**EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Bekem Metals, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the *“Report”*), I, Marat Cherdabayev, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

 
| Date: May 8, 2007 | By: | /s/ Marat Cherdabayev |  
 

Marat Cherdabayev, Principal Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

  |
|-------------------|-----|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### Beaver Hill Homes, Inc., Appellant, v. Gramatan National Bank and Trust Company of Bronxville, Respondent.

*599No opinion. Carswell, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1




                               PROXIM CORPORATION

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      As of the date hereof, I, Franco Plastina, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Proxim Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the annual report of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. This written statement is being furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit accompanying such Report
and shall not be deemed filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                                        /s/ FRANCO PLASTINA
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                                     Franco Plastina
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
                                              (Principal Executive Officer)

Date: March 12, 2004
407 P.2d 54

#### STATE of New Mexico, ex rel. Alexander F. SCERESSE, District Attorney, Second Judicial District, State of New Mexico, Petitioner, v. John B. McMANUS, Jr., District Judge, Second Judicial District, State of New Mexico, Respondent, and James W. Trimble, Real Party in Interest.

No. 8020.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Nov. 4, 1965.

CARMODY, Chief Justice, and CHAVEZ, NOBLE, MOISE and COMPTON, Justices, concurring.

Ordered that the petition for alternative writ qf mandamus he and the same is hereby denied.
### SUBCHAPTER V—SHARED RESPONSIBILITY FOR HEALTH CARE
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# June 2013 Report On The Status Of Public Petitions Under Title 10 Of The Code If Federal Regulations, Section 2.206.

Accession Number: ML13182A175

Date Released: Tuesday, July 16, 2013

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML13182A180 - Memo: June 2013 Report On The Status Of Public Petitions Under Title 10 Of The Code Of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206. (2 page(s), 7/16/2013)
    - ML13182A278 - Enclosure: Report On The Status Of Public Petitions Under Title 10 Of The Code If Federal Regulations, Section 2.206. (27 page(s), 7/16/2013)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### In the Matter of the claim of Grace J. Zaso, Respondent, against International Paper Company, Appellant. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

*882Present — Foster, P. J., Heffeman, Brewster, Deyo and Santry, JJ.
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TE XAS

N O . A P
- 7 7 , 0 5 5

R A N D A L L W A Y N E M A Y S , A p p e l l a n t

v . T H E S T A T E O F T E X A S

O N A P P E A L F R O M T H E D E N I A L O F A M O T I O N T O D E T E R M I N E E X E C U T I O N C O M P E T E N C Y F R O M C A U S E N O . B
- 1 5 6 , 7 1 7 I N T H E 3 9 2 N D D I S T R I C T C O U R T

H E N D E R S O N C O U N T Y

K E L L E R , P . J . , f

i l e d a d i s s e n t i n g o p i n i o n i n w h i c h M E Y E R S , J . , j o i n e d . Mental illness and in co m p etenc e to be executed are not the same thing. Appellant has 1 produce d evidenc e that he is mentally ill, but he has produce d no evidenc e that he fails to understand (1) that he is to be ex ecute d and the execution is imminent or (2) the reason he is to be ex ecute d. There is simply no evidenc e that any one has ever asked appellant if he understands that he is to be executed and that his e x ecution is imminent. Nor is the re any evidenc e that any one has asked him if he understands that he is being executed for the capital murder of two peac e office rs. I ag ree with

See Ferguson v. Sec'y, Fla. Dep't of Corr. , 716 F.3d 1315, 1336 n.4 (11th Cir. 2013); State 1 ex re l. Cole v. Griffith , 460 S.W .3d 349, 356 (Mo. 2015).MAYS DISSENT — 2

most of the Court's analy sis reg arding the proper standard of revie w, but I do not ag ree with its application to the fa cts in this case.
I respe ctfully

dissent. Filed: De cembe r 16, 2015 Publis h