alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Dziennik Urzędowy C 366A/30 p

| | ISSN 1977-1002 |
| --- | --- |
| Dziennik Urzędowy
  Unii Europejskiej | C 366A |
| | |
| Wydanie polskie | Informacje i zawiadomienia | Rocznik 6330 października 2020 |

ISSN 1977-1002

Dziennik Urzędowy

Unii Europejskiej

C 366A

Wydanie polskie

Informacje i zawiadomienia

Rocznik 6330 października 2020

---

| Spis treści | Strona |
| --- | --- |
| | Sprostowania |
| 2020/C 366 A/01 | Sprostowanie do ogłoszenia o naborze CONS/AD/162/20 ( Dz.U. C 358 A z 26.10.2020 ) | 1 |

Spis treści

Strona

Sprostowania

2020/C 366 A/01

Sprostowanie do ogłoszenia o naborze CONS/AD/162/20 ( Dz.U. C 358 A z 26.10.2020 )

( Dz.U. C 358 A z 26.10.2020 )

1

---

| PL | |
| --- | --- |

PL

---

Sprostowania

| 30.10.2020 | PL | Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej | CA 366/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2020

PL

Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej

CA 366/1

---

Sprostowanie do ogłoszenia o naborze CONS/AD/162/20

(
  Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej C 358 A z dnia 26 października 2020 r.
  )

(2020/C 366 A/01)

Strona 1, nagłówek „INFORMACJE OGÓLNE”, „Dział”:

| zamiast: | „DG RELEX: Sprawy Zagraniczne, Rozszerzenie i Ochrona Ludności”, |
| --- | --- |

zamiast:

„DG RELEX: Sprawy Zagraniczne, Rozszerzenie i Ochrona Ludności”,

| powinno być: | „DG RELEX: Stosunki Zewnętrzne”. |
| --- | --- |

powinno być:

powinno być:

„DG RELEX: Stosunki Zewnętrzne”.

Strona 1, nagłówek „Kim jesteśmy”, akapit drugi:

| zamiast: | „Dyrekcja Generalna ds. Zagranicznych, Rozszerzenia i Ochrony Ludności (DG RELEX) składa się obecnie z dwóch dyrekcji: RELEX.1 zajmuje się handlem, rozwojem, bezpieczeństwem i koordynacją, a RELEX.2 – rozszerzeniem, Bliskim Wschodem i Afryką Północną oraz ochroną ludności.”, |
| --- | --- |

zamiast:

zamiast:

„Dyrekcja Generalna ds. Zagranicznych, Rozszerzenia i Ochrony Ludności (DG RELEX) składa się obecnie z dwóch dyrekcji: RELEX.1 zajmuje się handlem, rozwojem, bezpieczeństwem i koordynacją, a RELEX.2 – rozszerzeniem, Bliskim Wschodem i Afryką Północną oraz ochroną ludności.”,

| powinno być: | „Dyrekcja Generalna ds. Stosunków Zewnętrznych (DG RELEX) składa się obecnie z dwóch dyrekcji: RELEX.1 zajmującej się handlem, rozwojem i bezpieczeństwem oraz RELEX.2 zajmującej się polityką sąsiedztwa i reagowaniem kryzysowym.”. |
| --- | --- |

powinno być:

powinno być:

„Dyrekcja Generalna ds. Stosunków Zewnętrznych (DG RELEX) składa się obecnie z dwóch dyrekcji: RELEX.1 zajmującej się handlem, rozwojem i bezpieczeństwem oraz RELEX.2 zajmującej się polityką sąsiedztwa i reagowaniem kryzysowym.”.

---
### §411. Cooperation with other Government agencies

Executive agencies within the meaning of section 105 of title 5 and the Government Publishing Office are authorized to furnish property, both real and personal, and personal and nonpersonal services to the Postal Service, and the Postal Service is authorized to furnish property and services to them. The furnishing of property and services under this section shall be under such terms and conditions, including reimbursability within the limitations of chapter 37, as the Postal Service and the head of the agency concerned shall deem appropriate.

(Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 726; Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title I, §1301(b), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2537; Pub. L. 117–108, title I, §103(b)(2), Apr. 6, 2022, 136 Stat. 1144.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–108 substituted "including reimbursability within the limitations of chapter 37" for "including reimbursability".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Government Publishing Office" substituted for "Government Printing Office" in text on authority of section 1301(b) of Pub. L. 113–235, set out as a note preceding section 301 of Title 44, Public Printing and Documents.

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1971, pursuant to Resolution No. 71–9 of the Board of Governors. See section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note preceding section 101 of this title.
#### Lewis & Murphy Realty, Inc., Respondent, v. Alfred Fischler et al., Individually and as Copartners Trading under the Name of Atlas Service Station No. 3, et al., Appellants.

Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Multi-Omics Analysis.                    

*Date:*                         February 13, 2019.                    

*Time:*                         2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, Suite 2W200, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Nijaguna Prasad, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Gateway Building, Suite 2W200, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-9667,                         *nijaguna.prasad@nih.gov.*

This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 23, 2019.

Melanie J. Pantoja,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2019-00282 Filed 1-29-19; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
### §12189. Examinations and courses

Any person that offers examinations or courses related to applications, licensing, certification, or credentialing for secondary or postsecondary education, professional, or trade purposes shall offer such examinations or courses in a place and manner accessible to persons with disabilities or offer alternative accessible arrangements for such individuals.

(Pub. L. 101–336, title III, §309, July 26, 1990, 104 Stat. 365.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 18 months after July 26, 1990, see section 310(a) of Pub. L. 101–336, set out as a note under section 12181 of this title.
### **CHAPTER 52A—JOINT FUNDING SIMPLIFICATION**
#### In the Matter of Thomas F. Walsh, Jr., against Harry W. Marsh et al., Constituting the Municipal Civil Service Commission of the City of New York, et al.

Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
§ 919.215 Which nonprocurement transactions are not covered transactions? The following types of nonprocurement transactions are not covered transactions: ( a ) A direct award to— ( 1 ) A foreign government or foreign governmental entity;
( 2 ) A public international organization;
( 3 ) An entity owned (in whole or in part) or controlled by a foreign government; or
( 4 ) Any other entity consisting wholly or partially of one or more foreign governments or foreign governmental entities.
( b ) A benefit to an individual as a personal entitlement without regard to the individual's present responsibility (but benefits received in an individual's business capacity are not excepted). For example, if a person receives social security benefits under the Supplemental Security Income provisions of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 1301 *et seq.,* those benefits are not covered transactions and, therefore, are not affected if the person is excluded.
( c ) Federal employment.
( d ) A transaction that the OPM needs to respond to a national or agency-recognized emergency or disaster.
( e ) A permit, license, certificate, or similar instrument issued as a means to regulate public health, safety, or the environment, unless the OPM specifically designates it to be a covered transaction.
( f ) An incidental benefit that results from ordinary governmental operations.
( g ) Any other transaction if the application of an exclusion to the transaction is prohibited by law.
#### George *W.*Frost, plaintiff in error, v. The Omaha Hotel Company, defendant in error. St. A. D. Balcombe, plaintiff in error, v. The Omaha Hotel Company, defendant in error.

Per Curiam.

The above cases being, in all respects, similar to the case of *Boehme v. The Omaha Hotel Company,*it is only necessary to remark in regard to them that, for the reasons given in the opinion in the case referred to, the judgment rendered in each case in the court below must be reversed, and each cause must be remanded for further proceedings, with leave to amend the petition.

Judgment reversed.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3370 

To provide that the United States Postal Service may not close any post 

office that does not have another post office within 8 miles as measured 

by public roads with regular year-round access, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 4, 2011 

Mr. CRAWFORD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To provide that the United States Postal Service may not 

close any post office that does not have another post 

office within 8 miles as measured by public roads with 

regular year-round access, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Our Rural 

5 Post Offices Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON CLOSING OF POST OFFICES. 

7 Section 404(d) of title 39, United States Code, is 

8 amended by adding at the end the following: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3370 IH

1 ‘‘(7) Notwithstanding any other provision of 

2 this subsection, in making a determination under 

3 subsection (a)(3) as to the necessity for the closing 

4 or consolidation of a post office, the Postal Service 

5 may not close any post office that does not have an6 other post office within 8 miles as measured by pub7 lic roads with regular year-round access.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 20, 2004, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), EMVCo, LLC (“EMVCo”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                 

                    Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: EMVCo, LLC, Foster City, CA. The nature and scope of EMVCo's standards development activities are: (1) Managing, maintaining, and enhancing the EMVtm                     Integrated Circuit Card Specifications for Payment Systems; (2) standards maintenance that ensures interoperability and acceptance of payment system integrated circuit cards on a worldwide basis; and (3) a type approval process that defines test requirements and test cases that are used for terminal compliance testing.                 

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-26208 Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
§ 2016.3 Publication regarding requests. Following the Presidential decision and where required, the publication of a Presidential proclamation modifying the application of benefits under the ATPA to countries or articles in the Federal Register, USTR will publish a summary of the decisions made in the Federal Register, including: ( a ) For petitions on which decisions were made, a description of the outcome of the review; and
( b ) A list of petitions on which no decision was made, and thus which are pending further review.
§ 744.5 Restrictions on certain maritime nuclear propulsion end-uses. ( a ) *General prohibition.* In addition to the license requirements for items specified on the CCL, you may not export, reexport, or transfer (in-country) certain technology subject to the EAR without a license if at the time of the export, reexport or transfer (in-country) you know the item is for use in connection with a foreign maritime nuclear propulsion project. This prohibition applies to any technology relating to maritime nuclear propulsion plants, their land prototypes, and special facilities for their construction, support, or maintenance, including any machinery, devices, components, or equipment specifically developed or designed for use in such plants or facilities.
( b ) *Exceptions.* The exceptions provided in part 740 of the EAR do not apply to the prohibitions described in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) *License review standards.* It is the policy of the United States Government not to participate in and not to authorize United States firms or individuals to participate in foreign naval nuclear propulsion plant projects, except under an Agreement for Cooperation on naval nuclear propulsion executed in accordance with § 123(d) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954. However, it is the policy of the United States Government to encourage United States firms and individuals to participate in maritime (civil) nuclear propulsion plant projects in friendly foreign countries provided that United States naval nuclear propulsion information is not disclosed.
[61 FR 12802, Mar. 25, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 25459, May 9, 1997; 73 FR 68326, Nov. 18, 2008]
§ 1502.42 Decision by Commission on appeal or review of initial decision. ( a ) On appeal from or review of the initial decision, the Commission has all the powers given to the presiding officer with respect to the initial decision. On the Commission's own initiative or on motion, the Commission may remand the matter to the presiding officer for any further action necessary for a proper decision.
( b ) The scope of the issues at the public hearing is the same as the scope of the issues on appeal at the public hearing unless the Commission specifies otherwise.
( c ) As soon as possible after the filing of briefs and the presentation of any oral argument, the Commission will issue a final decision in the proceeding, which meets the requirements established in § 1502.40 (b) and (c).
( d ) The Commission may adopt the initial decision as the final decision.
( e ) Notice of the Commission's decision will be published in the Federal Register. The Commission may also publish the decision when it is of widespread interest.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 19-0678

SUNSET IRRIGATION DISTRICT, 

CHRISS MACK and CAROLYN 

MACK,, 

 Claimants and Appellees,

 v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (FISH 

AND WILDLIFE SERVICE); GLENDA

F. ANDERSON, JIMMY A.

ANDERSON, JOHN ANDERSON, and 

ROWDY ANDERSON

 

 Objectors and Appellants,

 

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION 

OF TIME 

Pursuant to the Unopposed Motion of Claimants/Appellees Chriss Mack and 

Carolyn Mack for an extension of time to file its Response Brief in the aboveentitled case, the absence of any objection by the opposing party and in accordance 

with Montana Rule of Appellate Procedure 26(2),

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for filing and service of

Claimants/Appellees’ Response Brief is extended until September 15, 2020. 

Dated this ____ day of September 2020.

Chief Justice of the Supreme Court

cc: Raymond Tipp

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 4 2020

09/04/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0678
Appendix A to Part 82

-- Certification Regarding Lobb yi ng

Certification for Contracts, Grants, Loans, and Cooperative Agreements The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that: (1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to an y person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employ ee of an agency , a Member of Congress, an officer or employ ee of Congress, or an employ ee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of an y Federal contract, the making of an y Federal grant, the making of an y Federal loan, the entering into of an y cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal cont ract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. (2) If an y funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or emplo ye e of any agency , a Member of Congress, an officer or emplo ye e of Congress, or an employ ee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form

- LLL, Disclosure Form to Report Lobb yi ng,'' in a ccordance with its instructions. (3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and coo perative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingl y. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certific ation is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100, 000 for each such failure.
Statement for Loan Guarantees and Loan Insurance The undersigned states, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:
If an y funds have been paid or will be paid to an y person for influencing or attempting to influenc e an officer or employ ee of an y agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or emplo ye e of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form

- LLL, ``Disclosure Form to Report L obby ing,'' in accordance with its instructions. Submission of this statement is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by

section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required statementshall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.
#### Berkshire Apartment Association, Respondent, v. Louis R. Taylor and Another, Individually, etc., Appellants.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present—Clarke, P. J., Scott, Dowling, Smith and Page, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6428

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus HARRY T. HANLEY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. Elizabeth V. Hallanan, Senior District Judge. (CR-91-66, CA-95-1052-1) Submitted: August 27, 1998 Decided: September 10, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harry T. Hanley, Appellant Pro Se. John Castle Parr, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998)) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hanley , Nos. CR91-66; CA-95-1052-1 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 14 & July 18, 1997). See Lindh v. Murphy , 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). To the extent that Appellant raises the same claims as he raised in a prior § 2255 motion, those claims are procedurally defaulted. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### Part A—Indian Program