alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Romona S. Kleinman, Respondent, *v.*Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Appellant.

First Department,

February 16, 1948.

*253
      *David B. Crow*of counsel *(Tanner, Sillcochs & Friend,*attorneys), for appellant.

*Isidor Neuwirth*of counsel *(Emil Katzka,*attorney), for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The action is to recover the accidental death benefits alleged to have accrued under two policies of life insurance issued by the defendant.

The evidence disclosed' that the insured was accidentally thrown or fell to the floor on January 19,1943. It is the contention of the plaintiff that the fall resulted in the insured’s death on April 17, 1943, of a heart attack. Proof of the causal relation between the fall and the death was offered by way of opinion testimony of a medical witness. It was the opinion of this witness, based upon the facts set forth in the hypothetical question put to him which did not include the actual condition of the heart as found at the time of the autopsy, that the fall caused a rupture of a small coronary artery, referred to medically as a coronary thrombosis, from which he never recovered and which caused his death on April 17th. He testified in part that 11 the left coronary artery is the large artery, but it has branches and it is these branches which become thrombosed.”

He stated that the heart failure was due to the closing of one of the small coronary arteries.

Aside from the opinion testimony of defendant’s medical experts, testimony was given by the doctor who performed the autopsy on the deceased. He testified that the heart was found to be one and one-half times its normal size and that the sclerosis or narrowing of the coronary vessels was quite extensive. The left or largest of the coronary arteries was so constricted at its opening that a probe the size of a pencil lead could not be; *254inserted into it, whereas normally the pencil itself could be inserted.

The condition of the heart as found by the autopsy clearly established that the insured was afflicted with coronary sclerosis for some time prior to the accident and that the disease had progressed to such an extent that the largest of the coronary arteries had narrowed to the point where only a trickle of blood could pass through it. This occlusion of the large artery was sufficient to have caused the death of the deceased regardless of any rupture of one of the smaller arteries.

In view of the positive direct testimony as to the actual facts as discovered by the autopsy the opinion testimony of plaintiff’s expert was of no probative value whatsoever and a submission of the issue' to the jury on that evidence would merely permit speculation and conjecture. The court, therefore, should have granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint made at the end of the entire case. Accordingly the judgment appealed from should be reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs.

Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ., concur.

Judgment unanimously reversed, with costs and the complaint dismissed, with costs.
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the Registranton Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersignedcertify pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

| /s/ Steven R. Williams                      |  | July 22, 2005 |
|---------------------------------------------|--|---------------|
| Steven R. Williams, Chairman,               |  |
| and Chief Executive Officer of              |  |
| Petroleum Development Corporation,          |  |
| Managing  General Partner of the Registrant |  |
|                                             |  |
| /s/ Darwin L. Stump                         |  | July 22, 2005 |
| Darwin L. Stump                             |  |
| Chief  Financial Officer and Treasurer of   |  |
| Petroleum  Development Corporation,         |  |
| Managing  General Partner of the Registrant |  |

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signaturethat appears in typed form within the electronic version of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Registrant and willbe retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
# L_2020311EN.01000101.xml

| 25.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 311/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 311/1

---

Information on the entry into force of the Council Implementing Decision authorising the United Kingdom to express its consent, in its own capacity, to be bound by certain international agreements to be applied during the transition period in the area of the Union's common fisheries policy

The Council Implementing Decision authorising the United Kingdom to express its consent, in its own capacity, to be bound by certain international agreements to be applied during the transition period in the area of the Union’s common fisheries policy of 18 September 2020 was notified to the United Kingdom on the date of its adoption. In accordance with the final sentence of the second paragraph of Article 297 TFEU, that decision took effect 18 September 2020.

---
### **CHAPTER 39—SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL**
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# Quarterly January - March 2014 Report on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206.

Accession Number: ML14091A558

Date Released: Thursday, May 1, 2014

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML14090A410 - Quarterly January - March 2014 Report on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206. (3 page(s), 4/22/2014)
    - ML14090A382 - Quarterly January - March 2014 Report on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206. (24 page(s), 4/22/2014)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2106

To permit Members of the House of Representatives to use funds provided 

in Member’s Representational Allowances to obtain POW/MIA flags and 

distribute them to constituents. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2003

Mr. RODRIGUEZ (for himself, Mr. FROST, and Mr. BISHOP of Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House 

Administration 

A BILL

To permit Members of the House of Representatives to use 

funds provided in Member’s Representational Allowances 

to obtain POW/MIA flags and distribute them to constituents.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMITTING USE OF MEMBER’S REPRESENTA4 TIONAL ALLOWANCE TO PURCHASE POW/MIA 

5 FLAGS FOR CONSTITUENTS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—A Member of the House of Rep7 resentatives may use amounts provided in the Member’s 

8 Representational Allowance to obtain POW/MIA flags and 
2

•HR 2106 IH 

1 distribute such flags to constituents in connection with of2 ficial and representational duties. 

3 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section—

4 (1) the term ‘‘Member’’ includes a Delegate or 

5 Resident Commissioner to the Congress; and 

6 (2) the term ‘‘POW/MIA flag’’ means the Na7 tional League of Families POW/MIA flag designated 

8 by section 902 of title 36, United States Code. 

9 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

10 This Act shall apply with respect to fiscal year 2004 

11 and each succeeding fiscal year.

Æ
2

•HR 2106 IH 

1 distribute such flags to constituents in connection with of2 ficial and representational duties. 

3 (b) Definitions.—In this section—

4 (1) the term ‘‘Member’’ includes a Delegate or 

5 Resident Commissioner to the Congress; and 

6 (2) the term ‘‘POW/MIA flag’’ means the Na7 tional League of Families POW/MIA flag designated 

8 by section 902 of title 36, United States Code. 

9 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

10 This Act shall apply with respect to fiscal year 2004 

11 and each succeeding fiscal year.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                              List of Subsidiaries

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         Jurisdiction
                                                              of
Name                                                    Incorporation  Ownership
----                                                    -------------- ---------
<S>                                                     <C>            <C>
Stratos Lightwave LLC..................................    Delaware       100%
Stratos Lightwave--Florida Incorporated................    Delaware       100%
Bandwidth Semiconductor LLC............................    Delaware       100%
Advanced Interconnection Technology LLC................    Delaware       100%
MP Optical Communications LLC..........................    Illinois        60%
B&H Mold LLC...........................................    Delaware       100%
Stratos Limited........................................ United Kingdom    100%
</TABLE>
### §6507. Account in Treasury

(a) Establishment and Contents of Separate Account.—There is a separate account in the Treasury. The account includes all amounts deposited in the account under section 6506(f) of this title and amounts appropriated to the account. However, the appropriated amounts may not be more than $2,000,000.

(b) Use of Amounts.—Amounts in the account are available to the Architect of the Capitol—

(1) for paying expenses for structural, mechanical, and domestic care, maintenance, operation, and utilities of the Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building and other improvements constructed under this chapter;

(2) for reimbursing the United States Capitol Police for expenses incurred in providing exterior security for the Building and other improvements;

(3) for making lease payments under section 6504 of this title; and

(4) for necessary personnel (including consultants).

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1192.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6507 | 40:1207. | Pub. L. 100–480, §9, Oct. 7, 1988, 102 Stat. 2334; Pub. L. 102–392, title III, §311(b), Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1723. |

Section

The text of 40:1207(b) is omitted as obsolete.
### subpart 2—public health workforce
#### National Surety Company v. Catherine A. McGuire. National Surety Company v. Catherine A. McGuire.

Motions granted, with ten dollars costs. Present—Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Smith, JJ.
Exhibit 23.7

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements:

|  | (1) |  | Registration Statement (Form S-3 Nos. 333-118503, 333-130515, 333-132684, 333-139304, 333-149744, 333-163781 and 333-165853) of Endeavour International Corporation and in the related Prospectuses, |
|--|-----|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) |  | Registration Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-186274) of Endeavour International Corporation and in the related Prospectuses, and |
|--|-----|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (3) |  | Registration Statement (Form S-8 Nos. 333-119577, 333-128692, 333-143794, 333-149743, 333-157967, 333-169851, 333-171392, 333-183250 and 333-183251) of Endeavour International Corporation and in the related Prospectuses; |
|--|-----|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

of our report dated March 17, 2013, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Endeavour International Holdings B.V. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2013.

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

 

Houston, Texas 

March 17, 2014

----
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Prime Sun Power Inc.
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Olivier de
Vergnies, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge
that:
 
 (1) 
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2) 
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 
 Date:
April 8, 2010
 By:
              /s/
      Olivier de VergniesName:
              Olivier
      de VergniesTitle:
              Principal
      Executive Officer and

                Principal
      Financial Officer
#### Mrs. James Vaughn, plaintiff in error, v. Clark and French, defendants in error.

1. Judicial Sale. A purchaser at judicial sale, under a decree of • foreclosure, takes the property subject to whatever liens may exist thereon at that time.

2.-: taxes. And if such purchaser, after the sale, pay delinquent taxes that have accumulated thereon, he is not entitled to be reimbursed out of the purchase money as against the lien of a junior mortgagee.

Error to the district court of Merrick county.

*J. If. Woolworth*and *W. H.*Webster, for plaintiff in error.

*A.*Ewing, for defendants in error.

Lake, Ch. J.

This case, although entitled as' one in error, was really brought into this court by appeal. Flowever, the case being one in equity is properly before us, and it will be considered the same as if this technical irregularity did not exist.

The action below was brought by Clark and French as junior mortgagees, for the purpose of enforcing their equitable lien against certain surplus moneys in the *239hands of the sheriff of Merrick county, realized by that officer on the sale of the mortgaged premises under a judgment of foreclosure, rendered on a prior mortgage on the same premises. The petition contains all the necessary averments to entitle the plaintiffs to the relief they ask; to which Mrs. Yaughn, who was made a defendant, answered, demanding that said funds be awarded to her in satisfaction of certain tax liens, which she, as the purchaser at said foreclosure sale, had been compelled to pay, in order to perfect her title to the premises. Mrs. Yaughn shows by her answer that these taxes had become delinquent during the pendency of the suit upon her own mortgage; and that she satisfied them by a purchase of the property from the county treasurer at private tax sale, on the same day that she made her purchase under the judgment of foreclosure. To this answer, the plaintiffs filed a general demurrer, which was sustained; and the question thus raised is brought before us for review.

It does not appear that any provision was made, in the decree under the senior mortgage, for the payment of any taxes whatever. Indeed, no mention of them in the pleadings seems to have been made in that case. The sale of the mortgaged premises appears to have been decreed, without reference to any tax lien that existed thereon. In such case, the rule seems to be that the purchaser takes the property subject to the lien, and cannot resort to the purchase money to reimburse himself for the expense of removing the incumbrance.

We are of opinion, therefore, that Mrs. Yaughn, by her purchase at the sheriff’s sale, took the premises subject to whatever tax liens existed thereon at the time. She has no valid claim to the money in question; and the judgment of the district court must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.
#### Edward Brinley, Respondent, v. Thomas A. Nevins, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.; Ingraham, P. J., dissented on dissenting opinion upon former appeal. (See 162 App. Div. 744, 747.)
### SUBCHAPTER II—ADOPTION OPPORTUNITIES
§ 970.2501 Notice of pre-license exploration voyages. ( a ) *General.* Any United States citizen who schedules an exploration voyage to begin after November 20, 1980 shall file written notice with the Administrator which sets out: ( 1 ) The name, address and telephone number of the citizen;
( 2 ) The anticipated date of commencement of the voyage and its planned duration;
( 3 ) The exploration activities to be carried out on the voyage, including a general description of the equipment and methods to be used, and an estimate of the anticipated extent of seabed disturbance and effluent discharge; and
( 4 ) If the U.S. citizen has not filed a notice of pre-enactment exploration in accordance with § 970.2402, the information specified in § 970.2402(b).
( b ) *When and where to file Notice of future exploration* — ( 1 ) *When.* ( i ) Except as allowed in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the notice required by paragraph (a) of this section must be filed not later than 45 days prior to the date on which the exploration voyage is scheduled to begin.
( ii ) With respect to filing of the information referred to in paragraph (a)(4) of this section, the filing dates specified in paragraph (b) of this section shall prevail over the date specified in § 970.2402(a).
( 2 ) *Exception.* If an exploration voyage is scheduled to begin before January 5, 1981, the notice required by paragraph (a) of this section must be filed on or before December 22, 1980.
( 3 ) *Where.* The notice required by paragraph (a) of this section must be filed in writing with the Administrator, at the address specified in § 970.2402(a) of this part.
# C_2021185EN.01000601.xml

| 12.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 185/6 |
| --------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | ------- |

---

Notification by the European Union made in accordance with the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part (2021/C 185/03) The European Union hereby notifies the United Kingdom of the following in relation to the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part (the ‘Trade and Cooperation Agreement’). I.   REVISION TO THE LIST OF COMPETENT AUTHORITIES The details below replace the corresponding details notified to the United Kingdom on 29 January 2021. b)   Article 690(7)(b) ( 1 )
: Notification of the authority competent by virtue of the domestic law of each Member State to execute an arrest warrant; Spain The Spanish court competent to recognise and execute arrest warrants is the Criminal Chamber (Sala de lo Penal) of the National High Court (Audiencia Nacional), except in cases where the requested person did not object to the arrest warrant issued by the UK authorities, in which case the relevant Central Investigating Court (Juzgado Central de Instrucción) would be competent. II.   ADDITIONAL OTHER NOTIFICATIONS The notifications below are added to the notifications made to the United Kingdom on 26 February 2021. 8)   Notification under Article 659(4)/Article 690(2) ( 2 ) The European Union notifies, on behalf of the following Member States, that Article 659 ( 3 ) will be extended to accounts held in non-bank financial institutions, subject to the principle of reciprocity: Cyprus. 9)   Notification under Article 660(5)/Article 690(2) ( 4 ) The European Union notifies, on behalf of the following Member States, that Article 660 ( 5 ) will be extended to accounts held in non-bank financial institutions, subject to the principle of reciprocity: Cyprus. 11)   Notification under Article 670/Article 690(2) ( 6 ) The European Union notifies, on behalf of the following Member States, that, on the basis of reciprocity, the condition of double criminality referred to in point (b) of Article 670(1) ( 7 ) will not be applied provided that the offence giving rise to the request is a) one of the offences listed in Article 599(4) ( 8 ), as defined by the law of the requesting State, and b) punishable by the requesting State by a custodial sentence or a detention order for a maximum period of at least three years: Netherlands. ( 1 )  ex Article LAW.OTHER 134(7)(b). ( 2 )  ex Article LAW.CONFISC.4(4)/Article LAW.OTHER.134(2). ( 3 )  ex Article LAW.CONFISC.4. ( 4 )  ex Article LAW.CONFISC.5(5)/Article LAW.OTHER.134(2). ( 5 )  ex LAW.CONFISC.5. ( 6 )  ex Article LAW.CONFISC.15(2)/Article LAW.OTHER.134(2). ( 7 )  ex Article LAW.CONFISC.15(1). ( 8 )  ex Article LAW.SURR.79(4).

---
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### SEP 26 2002 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT
UNITES STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. HAROLD GLEN CLAYTON, Defendant - Appellant. No. 01-7093 (D.C. No. 01-CV-106-P, 98-CR-25-1)

(E.D. Oklahoma)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before EBEL, KELLY , and LUCERO , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously to honor the parties’ request for a dec ision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore submitted without oral argument. Appellant’s Apprendi claims are barred under United States v. Mora , 293 F.3d 1213 (10th Cir. 2002) and procedural bar. App ellant’s ineffective assistance- 2 -

of counsel claims were properly denied because of p rocedural bar, failure to show either actual conflict of interest or prejudice, an d because the claims are conclusory and not supported in the record. We have examined all of the claims raised by Appell ant on appeal and find that none of them have merit. Accordingly, the district court order denying petit ioner’s petition for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is AFFIRMED.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT
David M. Ebel Circuit Judge
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods indicated.
  Dated: May 6, 2011
    /s/ BRET W. JOHNSENBret W. JohnsenSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer