alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 30, 2021

No. 04-20-00107-CV

Douglas HEDRICK and Mark Hedrick,

Appellants

v.

JBRF, LLC; Lonestar Handguns, LLC; Joshua Felker; August C. Golla; and Debra S. Golla,

Appellees

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-CI-00267

Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

This case was submitted on briefs on February 9, 2021. On June 28, 2021, the parties 

filed a joint motion to abate this appeal for thirty days to give the parties time to finalize a 

tentative settlement agreement. 

The joint motion to abate this appeal is GRANTED. See Transp. Ins. Co. v. Faircloth, 

898 S.W.2d 269, 280 (Tex. 1995) (“Public policy favors the amicable settlement of 

controversies.”).

We ABATE this appeal until July 28, 2021.

We ORDER Appellants to file in this court not later than July 28, 2021, (1) a motion to 

dismiss the appeal or (2) a motion to reinstate the appeal on the court’s docket so the appeal may 

proceed. 

It is so ORDERED on June 30, 2021.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
### subpart 3—recruitment and retention programs
#### In the Matter of Bryce R.W., an Infant. Orleans County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Sarah J.B., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Savannah W., an Infant. Orleans County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Sarah J.B., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.) In the Matter of Deborah W., Petitioner, v Orleans County Department of Social Services et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 3.) In the Matter of Denise F. et al., Petitioners, v Sarah J.B., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 4.)

[821 NYS2d 535]

Appeal from an amended order of the Family Court, Orleans County (James E Punch, J.), entered September 26, 2005 in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b. The amended order, among other things, terminated the parental rights of respondent Sarah J.B. with respect to her two children.

It is hereby ordered that the amended order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Respondent mother (respondent) appeals from an amended order of disposition that, inter alia, terminated her *1313parental rights with respect to her two children. Respondent’s contention that Family Court abused its discretion in failing to issue a suspended judgment is not preserved for our review because respondent did not request a suspended judgment *(see Matter of Rosalinda R.,*16 AD3d 1063, 1064 [2005], *lv denied*5 NY3d 702 [2005]). In any event, the evidence at the dispositional hearing establishes that respondent was unlikely to change her behavior, and we thus conclude that a suspended judgment would not be in the best interests of the children *(see Matter of Meko H.,*28 AD3d 1252 [2006], *lv denied*7 NY3d 705 [2006]; *Matter of Yusef P.,*298 AD2d 968; *Matter of Sonny H.B.,*249 AD2d 940 [1998]). Contrary to respondent’s further contention, the court did not err in refusing to award custody of the children to petitioner grandmother. Rather, the evidence supports the court’s conclusion that it was in the best interests of the children to remain in the custody of petitioner-respondent Orleans County Department of Social Services to allow their adoption by their foster parents *(see Matter of Donald W.,*17 AD3d 728, 729-730 [2005], *lv denied*5 NY3d 705 [2005]; *Matter of Violetta K. v Mary K.,*306 AD2d 480, 481-482 [2003]; *Matter of Tiffany Malika B.,*215 AD2d 200, 201 [1995], *lv denied*86 NY2d 707 [1995]). We have considered respondent’s remaining contention and conclude that it is without merit. Present— Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Gorski and Green, JJ.
### §12725. Notice

The Secretary shall issue regulations to implement the provisions of this subchapter after notice and an opportunity for comment pursuant to section 553 of title 5. Such regulations shall become effective not later than 180 days after November 28, 1990.

(Pub. L. 101–625, title II, §206, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4096.)
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Princeton Rayon Corporation, Respondent, and Bambi Originals, Inc., Appellant.

Present — Peck, P. J., Grlennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
§ 1512.12 Requirements for wheel hubs. All bicycles (other than sidewalk bicycles) shall meet the following requirements: ( a ) *Locking devices.* Wheels shall be secured to the bicycle frame with a positive lock device. Locking devices on threaded axles shall be tightened to the manufacturer's specifications. ( 1 ) *Rear wheels.* There shall be no relative motion between the axle and the frame when a force of 1,780 N (400 lbf) is applied symmetrically to the axle for a period of 30 seconds in the direction of wheel removal.
( 2 ) *Front wheels.* Locking devices, except quick-release devices, shall withstand application of a torque in the direction of removal of 17 N-m (12.5 ft-lb).
( b ) *Quick-release devices.* Lever-operated, quick-release devices shall be adjustable to allow setting the lever position for tightness. Quick-release levers shall be clearly visible to the rider and shall indicate whether the levers are in a locked or unlocked position. Quick-release clamp action shall emboss the frame or fork when locked, except on fiber reinforced plastics.
( c ) *Front hubs.* Front hubs not equipped with lever-operated quick-release devices shall have a positive retention feature that shall be tested in accordance with the front hub retention test, § 1512.18(j)(3), to assure that when the locking devices are released the wheel will not separate from the fork.
[43 FR 60034, Dec. 22, 1978, as amended at 76 FR 27888, May 13, 2011]
§ 960.15 Term of license. ( a ) The license term begins when the Secretary transmits the signed license to the licensee, regardless of the operational status of the system.
( b ) The license is valid until the Secretary confirms in writing that the license is terminated, because the Secretary has determined that one of the following has occurred: ( 1 ) The licensee has successfully disposed of, or has taken all actions necessary to successfully dispose of, all on-orbit components of the system, and is in compliance with all other requirements of the Act, this part, and the license;
( 2 ) The licensee never had system components on orbit and has requested to end the license term;
( 3 ) The license is terminated pursuant to § 960.17; or
( 4 ) The licensee has executed one of the following transfers, subsequent to the Secretary's approval of such transfer: ( i ) Ownership of the system, or the operations thereof, to an agency or instrumentality of the U.S. Government; or
( ii ) Operations to a person who is not a U.S. person and who will not operate the system from the United States.
Memorandum July	2,	2014

Subject: Wood	Heater	NSPS	Call	with	Dan	Johnson

From: Gregory	Green,	Director

Outreach	and	Information	Division

Office	of	Air	Quality	Planning	and	Standards

To: Docket	#EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2009

- 0734

Participants: Gregory Green

Dan	Johnson

This	memorandum	to	docket	provides	a	brief	summary	of	the	discussion	between	Dan	Johnson,

Executive	Director,	WESTAR,	and	Gregory	Green. Mr.	Johnson	called	to	inform	me	of	a	discussion	that

took	place	on	July	1 st between	himself,	Arthu r	Marin	of	NESCAUM,	and	Jack	Goldman	representing

HPBA.	The	discussion	involved	three	issues	in	the	recently	proposed	Wood	Heater	NSPS.	These	three

issues	are:

1. How	the	final	rule	may	regulate	the	transition	from	crib	to	cord	wood	testing	for	woodstoves.

2. A	suitable	compliance	schedule	for	grandfathering	the	compliance	certification	and	the	sell

through	of	the	existing	inventory	of	woodstoves	and	hydronic	heaters.

3. An	initial	standard	for	forced	air	furnaces	since	these	stoves	had	been	previously	unregulated in

the	past.
| **Insider Trading Policies and Procedures**              | 12 Months Ended |
|----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|
||
| **Insider Trading Policies and Procedures [Line Items]** |            |
| Insider Trading Policies and Procedures Adopted          | true            |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Regulation S-K -Number 229 -Section 408 -Subsection b -Paragraph 1Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Form 20-F -Section 16 -Subsection J -Paragraph a
+ Details**Name:**ecd_InsiderTradingPoliciesProcLineItems**Namespace Prefix:**ecd_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Regulation S-K -Number 229 -Section 408 -Subsection b -Paragraph 1Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Form 20-F -Section 16 -Subsection J -Paragraph a
+ Details**Name:**ecd_InsiderTrdPoliciesProcAdoptedFlag**Namespace Prefix:**ecd_**Data Type:**xbrli:booleanItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
Order entered February 26, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01308-CR

No. 05-14-01309-CR

GERARDO DELACRUZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F13-21654-R,F12-22418-R

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeals.

On January 23, 2015, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the 

reporter’s record had not been filed. On February 25, 2015, we received the reporter’s record. 

Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the January 23, 2015 order 

requiring findings.

Appellant’s brief is due within thirty days of the date of this order. 

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT 23.3**                                                                                                                              *Gaffney, Cline & Associates***CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT RESERVOIR ENGINEERS**We hereby consent to the inclusion in the Endeavour International Corporation Form 10-K/A for theyear ended December 31, 2005, and the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement numberNo. 333-119577 of Endeavour International Corporation on Form S-8, number 333-118503 of EndeavourInternational Corporation on Form S-3, Registration Statement number No. 333-128692 of EndeavourInternational Corporation on Form S-8, Registration Statement number 333-130515 of EndeavourInternational Corporation on Form S-3, as amended, and Registration Statement number 333-124145 ofEndeavour International Corporation on Form S-3, as amended, of the reference to Gaffney, Cline &Associates Ltd.Bentley, Hampshire, England
##### 



ENDEAVOUR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
NONSTATUTORY STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
 
 
   Grant of Nonstatutory Stock Option .
 th
 Administration




---



##### 



Vesting: Time of Exercise
          2




---



##### 



Term; Forfeiture th
 th
 Who May Exercise
 No Fractional Shares
 Manner of Exercise
 3




---



##### 



Nonassignability
 Rights as Stockholder
 4




---



##### 



Adjustment of Number of Optioned Shares and Related Matters
 Community Property
 Dispute Resolution
 Arbitration
    5




---



##### 



Emergency Relief
 Grantees Representations
 Investment Representation
 6




---



##### 



Grantees Acknowledgments
 Law Governing
 No Right to Continue Service or Employment
 Legal Construction
 Covenants and Agreements as Independent Agreements
 Entire Agreement
 7




---



##### 



Parties Bound
 Modification
 Headings
 Gender and Number
 Independent Legal and Tax Advice
 Notice
 (a)
    
    Notice to the Company shall be addressed and delivered as follows:
 Endeavour International Corporation
1000 Main Street, Suite 3300
Houston, Texas 77002
Facsimile: (713) 307-8794
Attention: Corporate Secretary(b)
    
    Notice to the Grantee shall be addressed and delivered as set forth on the
signature page.
 Tax Requirements
 Tax Withholding
 Share Withholding
 8




---



##### 



[Signature Page Follows]
 9




---



##### 



COMPANY:ENDEAVOUR INTERNATIONALCORPORATIONBy:
    
    /s/ Don TeagueName:Title:
 GRANTEE:/s/ J. Michael KirkseyJ. Michael KirkseyAddress:
 10
### SUBCHAPTER VI—LICENSING AND REGULATION OF URANIUM ENRICHMENT FACILITIES
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region III

2443 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. III-12-035

Contact: Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil (630) 829-9663

August 15, 2012

E-Mail: OPA3.RegionIII@nrc.gov 

NRC BEGINS SPECIAL INSPECTION AT PALISADES NUCLEAR PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has started a Special Inspection to review a leak from 

a control rod drive mechanism inside the containment building. The leak has not resulted in a release of 

radiation to the environment and is not a threat to public health and safety. The plant is in a shutdown 

condition and will remain so until the leak has been fixed.

The plant is operated by Entergy Nuclear Operations and is located in Covert, Mich., about 40 

miles west of Kalamazoo.

The three member inspection team will begin work Wednesday and look into the circumstances 

surrounding the leak. They will review the utility’s monitoring of the leak and subsequent plant 

shutdown, verify the adequacy of radiological controls, evaluate any potential degradation, and review the 

plant’s repair actions. The team will also review the plant’s reporting requirements and their plan for 

addressing the cause of the event.

Since July, the NRC has been monitoring a gradual increase of unidentified leakage. The plant is 

required to be shut down when the unidentified leak rate exceeds 1 gallon per minute (gpm). At the point 

of shutdown, the unidentified leakage was about 0.3 gpm. On Aug. 12, the utility shutdown, entered

containment and determined the leak was from an area located on one of the control rod drive 

mechanisms. The limit for this area is 0 gpm. The plant will need to fix the leak before returning to 

operation.

NRC inspectors have been and continue to closely follow the plant’s repair activities and 

corrective actions. On Monday, an additional NRC inspector, well versed in engineering repair codes, was 

dispatched to further observe and inspect the plants actions.

The NRC’s special inspection report will be available within 45 days of the inspection’s 

completion of through the NRC RIII Office of Public Affairs or through the Agencywide Documents 

Access and Management System (ADAMS) at the NRC website.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.
#### Max Chopnick, Respondent, v. Sedgwick Minot, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
### §11304. Evaluation by Comptroller General

The Comptroller General of the United States may evaluate the disbursement and use of the amounts made available by appropriation Acts under the authorizations in subchapters III and IV.

(Pub. L. 100–77, title I, §105, July 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 486; Pub. L. 100–628, title I, §102(a), (b)(1), Nov. 7, 1988, 102 Stat. 3227; Pub. L. 104–316, title I, §122(t), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3838.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–316 substituted "may" for "shall annually" and struck out ", and submit to the Congress an annual summary of the status of each program authorized under this chapter" before period at end.

1988—Pub. L. 100–628 substituted "Annual program summary" for "Audits" in section catchline and, in text, substituted "shall annually evaluate" for "shall evaluate" and "submit to the Congress an annual summary of the status of each program authorized under this chapter" for "submit a report to the Congress setting forth the findings of such evaluation, upon the expiration of the 4-month and 12-month periods beginning on July 22, 1987".
§ 904.322 Interim action. ( a ) To protect marine resources during the pendency of an action under this subpart, in cases of willfulness, or as otherwise required in the interest of public health, welfare, or safety, a Judge may order immediate suspension, modification, or withholding of a permit until a decision is made on the action proposed in a NOPS or NIDP.
( b ) The Judge will order interim action under paragraph (a) of this section, only after finding that there exists probable cause to believe that the violation charged in the NOPS or NIDP was committed. The Judge's finding of probable cause, which will be summarized in the order, may be made: ( 1 ) After review of the factual basis of the alleged violation, following an opportunity for the parties to submit their views (orally or in writing, in the Judge's discretion); or
( 2 ) By adoption of an equivalent finding of probable cause or an admission in any administrative or judicial proceeding to which the recipient of the NOPS or NIDP was a party, including, but not limited to, a hearing to arrest or set bond for a vessel in a civil forfeiture action or an arraignment or other hearing in a criminal action. Adoption of a finding or admission under this paragraph may be made only after the Judge reviews pertinent portions of the transcript or other records, documents, or pleadings from the other proceeding.
( c ) An order for interim action under paragraph (a) of this section is unappealable and will remain in effect until a decision is made on the NOPS or NIDP. Where such interim action has been taken, the Judge will expedite any hearing requested under § 904.304.
§ 1145.5 Emberizing materials (embers and ash) containing respirable free-form asbestos; risk of cancer associated with inhalation of asbestos fibers. ( a ) The Commission finds that it is in the public interest to regulate the risk of cancer associated with inhalation of asbestos fibers from artificial emberizing materials (embers and ash) containing respirable free-form asbestos under the Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA) rather than under the Federal Hazardous Substances Act (FHSA) because of the desirability of avoiding possibly lengthy, resource-consuming, inefficient rulemaking proceedings under the FHSA, and because of the availability of civil penalties under the CPSA for knowing noncompliance.
( b ) Therefore, artificial emberizing materials (embers and ash) containing respirable free-form asbestos are regulated under the CPSA.
[42 FR 63354, Dec. 15, 1977]
### Division B—School-Based and Community-Based Service-Learning Programs

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

This division is comprised of subtitle B, §§111–120, of title I of Pub. L. 101–610. A prior part B (§12521 et seq.), comprised of subtitle B, §§111–118, of title I of Pub. L. 101–610, related to programs for students and out-of-school youth, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–82, title I, §103(a)(2), (b), Sept. 21, 1993, 107 Stat. 825, 837.
#### Rudolph J. LePore, Appellant, v Raymond Shaheen, Respondent.

[821 NYS2d 532]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Andrew V Siracuse, J.), entered March 29, 2005. The order denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is granted and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Monroe County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Plaintiff commenced *1331this action pursuant to RPAPL 1501 (4) seeking to cancel and discharge a mortgage based on the expiration of the six-year statute of limitations applicable to mortgage foreclosure actions *(see*CPLR 213 [4]). Supreme Court erred in denying plaintiffs motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff established his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting evidence establishing that more than six years had elapsed since he defaulted on the mortgage. Plaintiff thereby established that a mortgage foreclosure action commenced by defendant would be time-barred *(see id.; Phalen-Sobolevsky v Mullin,*26 AD3d 806 [2006]; *Corrado v Petrone,*139 AD2d 483 [1988]), and defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). We therefore reverse the order, grant plaintiff’s motion and remit the matter to Supreme Court to grant judgment consistent with this decision *(see*RPAPL 1501 [4]). Present — Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Gorski and Green, JJ.
### SUBCHAPTER I—HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE
### SUBCHAPTER II—TESTING OF HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
#### United States Title Guaranty Company, Respondent, v. Arthur A. Brown, Appellant.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ. Order to be settled before the presiding justice.
### §11804. Coordination with juvenile justice programs

The Secretary shall coordinate the program established by section 11801 of this title with the programs and activities carried out under the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 [34 U.S.C. 11101 et seq.] and with the programs and activities of the Attorney General, to ensure that all such programs and activities are complementary and not duplicative.

(Pub. L. 100–690, title III, §3504, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4255.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 93–415, Sept. 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 1109, which was classified principally to chapter 72 (§5601 et seq.) of this title, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as chapter 111 (§11101 et seq.) of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1974 Act note set out under section 10101 of Title 34 and Tables.