### 23850 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 82 / Thursday, April 28, 2011 / Notices

7 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).

8 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b– 4(f)(6)(iii) requires the Exchange to give the Commission written notice of the Exchange’s intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The Exchange has satisfied the five-day prefiling requirement.

9 See supra note 3.

10 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, the Commission has considered the proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 11 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). material proliferation of additional
series because it is restricted to a limited
number of classes.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition

The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for

Commission Action

Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest, does not impose any significant burden on competition, and, by its terms, does not become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 7 and Rule 19b– 4(f)(6) thereunder. 8

The Exchange has requested that the Commission waive the 30-day operative delay. The Commission believes that waiver of the operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest because the proposal is substantially similar to that of another exchange that has been approved by the Commission. 9 Therefore, the Commission designates the proposal operative upon filing. 10

At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. IV. Solicitation of Comments

Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

• Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or

• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File

Number SR–NYSEArca–2011–19 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

• Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC

20549–1090.

All submissions should refer to File

Number SR–NYSEArca–2011–19. This

file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions

should refer to File Number SR–

NYSEArca–2011–19 and should be submitted on or before May 19, 2011. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority. 11 Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2011–10214 Filed 4–27–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 8011–01–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Office of the Secretary**

**[Docket No. DOT–OST–2011–0019]**

**Agency Information Collection Activities: Approval of a Revision in**  **Information Collection(s); Comments Requested: National Infrastructure**  **Investments Grant Program or** ‘‘**TIGER II Discretionary Grants**  ’’

**AGENCY :**  Office of the Secretary (OST),

DOT.

**ACTION :**  Notice and request for

comments.

**SUMMARY :**  The Department of Transportation (DOT) invites public comments on a request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to approve the revision and amendment of a previously approved Information Collection Request (OMB Control # 2105–0563) in accordance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13,

44 USC 3501 et seq. ).

The previous approval granted the Department of Transportation authority to collect information involving
National Infrastructure Investments or

‘‘ TIGER II’’ Discretionary Grants pursuant to Title I of the Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act for 2010 (the ‘‘FY 2010 Appropriations Act). The Office of the Secretary of Transportation ( ‘‘ OST ’’ ) is referring to these grants as ‘‘ TIGER II Discretionary

Grants. ’’ The original collection of information was necessary in order to receive applications for grant funds pursuant to the Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act of 2010 ( ‘‘FY 2010 Appropriations Act’’ ), Title I—Department of Transportation, Office of the Secretary, National Infrastructure Investments, Public Law 111–117, 123 Stat. 3034. The purpose of the TIGER II Discretionary Grants program is to advance projects that will have a significant impact on the Nation, Metropolitan area or a region.

This revision revises the original request to include an additional
information collection. The additional


### 23851 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 82 / Thursday, April 28, 2011 / Notices

information to be collected will be used to, and is necessary to, evaluate the effectiveness of projects that have been awarded grant funds and to monitor project financial conditions and project progress in support of the Supplemental Discretionary Grants for Capital Investments in Surface Transportation Infrastructure, referred to by the Department as ‘‘ Grants for Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery’’ , or ‘‘ TIGER’’ Discretionary Grants program authorized and implemented pursuant to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the

‘‘Recovery Act’’ ) ( OMB Control Number: 2105–0560) and the grants for National
Infrastructure Investments under the FY 2010 Appropriations Act or TIGER II’’ Discretionary Grants. The purposes of the TIGER and TIGER II Discretionary Grant programs include promoting economic recovery and supporting projects that have a significant impact on the Nation, a metropolitan area, or a region.

A 60-day Federal Register notice was published on February 15, 2011 (76 FR 8804). Since the publication of the 60- day Federal Register notice, no
comments were received to the Docket (DOT–OST–2011–0019) and therefore no review of comments was required, so none was performed by the Department.

**DATES :**  Written comments should be submitted by May 31, 2011 and
submitted to the attention of the DOT/ OST Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503 with the
associated OMB Control Number 2105– 0563 and Dockets (DOT–OST–2011– 0019).

**ADDRESSES :**  You may submit comments [identified by Docket No. DOT–OST– 2011–0019] through one of the following methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.

• Fax: 1–202–493–2251

• Mail or Hand Delivery: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building, Room W12–140, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except on Federal holidays.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Robert Mariner, U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Transportation Policy, at

202–366–8914 or Robert.Mariner@dot.gov. **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  OMB Control Number: 2105–0563. Title: National Infrastructure Investments Grant Program or ‘‘ TIGER II Discretionary Grants ’’

.

Form Numbers: None. Type of Review: Renewal of an
information collection.

Background: On February 17, 2009, the President of the United States signed the Recovery Act to, among other purposes, (1) preserve and create jobs and promote economic recovery, (2) invest in transportation infrastructure that will provide long-term economic benefits, and (3) assist those most affected by the current economic downturn. The Recovery Act appropriated $1.5 billion of discretionary grant funds to be awarded by the Department of Transportation for capital investments in surface transportation infrastructure. The Department refers to these grants as

‘‘ Grants for Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery’’ or

‘‘ TIGER’’ Discretionary Grants. Funding for 51 projects totaling nearly $1.5 billion under the TIGER program was announced on February 17, 2010. Projects were selected based on their alignment with the selection criteria specified in the Federal Register notice for the TIGER Discretionary Grant program. On December 16, 2009 the President signed the FY 2010 Appropriations Act. The FY 2010 Appropriations Act appropriated $600
million for National Infrastructure Investments using language that is very similar, but not identical to the language in the Recovery Act authorizing the TIGER Discretionary Grants. The Department is referring to the grants for
National Infrastructure Investments as TIGER II Discretionary Grants. Like the TIGER Discretionary Grants, TIGER II Discretionary Grants are for capital investments in surface transportation
infrastructure and are to be awarded on a competitive basis for projects that will have a significant impact on the Nation, a metropolitan area, or a region. Funding for 75 projects totaling nearly $600 million under the TIGER II program was announced on October 20, 2010. Projects were selected based on their alignment with the selection criteria specified in the Federal Register notice for the TIGER II Discretionary Grant program. As announced in the Federal Register notices for each of the TIGER and TIGER II Discretionary Grant programs, grantees are expected to provide information to the Government so that the Government may monitor the financial conditions and progress of projects, as well as the effectiveness of projects using performance measurement metrics negotiated between the grantees and the Government. This request revises the existing PRA clearance to cover additional information from grantees that is necessary to negotiate the grant agreements and to cover the reporting requirements agreed to by the grant recipients of the TIGER and TIGER II Discretionary Grant programs.

The reporting requirements are as
follows:

Grantees will submit reports on the financial condition of the project and the project’s progress. Grantees will submit progress reports and the Federal Financial Report (SF–425) to the Government on a quarterly basis, beginning on the 20th of the first month of the calendar-year quarter following the execution of a grant agreement, and
on the 20th of the first month of each calendar-year quarter thereafter until completion of the project. The initial quarterly report will include a detailed description, and, where appropriate, drawings, of the items funded.

Grantees will also submit an Annual Budget Review and Program Plan to the Government, via e-mail, 60 days prior to the end of each Agreement year that they are receiving grant funds. The Annual Budget Review and Program Plan will provide a detailed schedule of activities, estimate of specific performance objectives, include forecasted expenditures, and a schedule of milestones for the upcoming year. If there is an actual or projected project cost increase, the Annual Budget Review and Program Plan will include a written plan for providing additional sources of funding to cover the project budget shortfall or supporting
documentation of committed funds to
cover the cost increase.

This information will be used to monitor grantees’ use of Federal funds, ensuring accountability and financial transparency in the TIGER and TIGER II Discretionary Grant programs.

Grantees will also submit reports on the performance (or projected performance) of the project using performance measures that the grantee and the Government selected through negotiations. The grantees will submit a Pre-project Report that will consist of
current baseline data for each of the performance measures specified in the
Performance Measurement Table in the grant agreement negotiated between thegrantee and the Government. The Preproject Report will include a detailed description of data sources, assumptions, variability, and the estimated level of precision for each measure. The grantees will submit quarterly Project Performance


### 23852 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 82 / Thursday, April 28, 2011 / Notices

Measurement Reports to the Government for each of the performance measures specified in the Performance Measurement Table in the grant agreement negotiated between the grantee and the Government. Grantees will submit reports at each of the
intervals identified for the duration of the time period specified in the
Performance Measurement Table in the grant agreement negotiated between the grantee and the Government. The grantees will submit a Project Outcomes Report after the project is completed
that will consist of a narrative discussion detailing project successes
and/or the influence of external factors on project expectations.

Respondents will have the opportunity to submit the information either electronically or by using fillable PDF, word processing or spreadsheet
files. This information will be used to evaluate and compare projects and to monitor results that grant funds achieve, ensuring that grant funds achieved the outcomes targeted by the TIGER and TIGER II Discretionary Grant programs.

The Department’s estimated burden
for the new information to be collected
is as follows:

Expected Number of Respondents:

126.

Frequency: Quarterly, and yearly. Estimated Average Burden per Response: 8 hours for each Quarterly Progress and Monitoring Report; 8 hours for each Annual Budget Review; 8 hours for each Quarterly Performance Measurement Report.

Estimated Total Annual Burden: 9,072 hours.

The following is detailed information and instructions regarding the specific reporting requirements for each report
identified above:

TIGER and TIGER II Discretionary Grant program grantees will submit a Project Progress and Monitoring Report and the Federal Financial Report (SF– 425) to the Government on a quarterly basis. Grantees should use the following structure when preparing the quarterly Project Progress and Monitoring Report.

• Project Progress and Monitoring Report

Æ Frequency: Quarterly (on the 20th
of the first month of the calendar quarter).

Æ Report covers: Previous quarter, along with a two-quarter forecast.

Æ Start: Upon award of grant.

Æ End: Once construction is complete.

Æ Format/Fields and accompanying instructions (beyond project ID information):

1. Executive Summary. —A clear and concise summary of the current status of the project, including identification of any major issues that have an impact on the project’s scope, budget, schedule, quality, or safety, including:

• Current total project cost (forecast) vs. latest budget vs. baseline budget. Include an explanation of the reasons for any deviations from the approved budget.

• Current overall project completion percentage vs. latest plan percentage.

• Any delays or exposures to milestone and final completion dates. Include an explanation of the reasons for the delays and exposures.

• A summary of the projected and actual dates for notices to proceed for significant contracts, start of construction, start of expenditure of TIGER and TIGER II Discretionary Grant funds, and project completion date. Include an explanation of the reasons for any discrepancies from the corresponding project milestone dates included in the Agreement.

• Any Federal obligations and/or TIFIA disbursements occurring during the month versus planned obligations or
disbursements.

• Any significant contracts advertised, awarded, or completed.

• Any significant scope of work changes.

• Any significant items identified as having deficient quality.

• Any significant safety issues.

• Any significant Federal issues such as environmental compliance, Buy America/Buy American (whichever is applicable to this Project), Davis Bacon Act Prevailing Wage requirements, etc.

2. Project Activities and
Deliverables. —Highlighting the project activities and deliverables occurring during the previous quarter (reporting period), and (2) define the activities and deliverables planned for the next two reporting periods. Activities and deliverables to be reported on should include meetings, audits and other reviews, design packages submitted, advertisements, awards, construction submittals, construction completion milestones, submittals related to Recovery Act requirements, media or Congressional inquiries, value engineering/constructability reviews, and other items of significance. The two reporting period ‘‘ look ahead schedule ’’
will enable the Government to accommodate any activities requiring input or assistance.

3. Action Items/Outstanding Issues.

— Drawing attention to, and tracking the progress of, highly significant or sensitive issues requiring action and direction in order to resolve. In general, issues and administrative requirements that could have a significant or adverse impact to the project’s scope, budget, schedule, quality, safety, and/or compliance with Federal requirements should be included. Status, responsible person(s), and due dates should be
included for each action item/ outstanding issue. Action items requiring action or direction should be included in the quarterly status meeting agenda. The action items/outstanding issues may be dropped from this section upon full implementation of the remedial action, and upon no further monitoring anticipated.

4. Project Schedule. —An updated master program schedule reflecting the current status of the program activities
should be included in this section. A Gantt (bar) type chart is probably the most appropriate for quarterly reporting purposes, with the ultimate format to be agreed upon between the grantee and the Government. It is imperative that the master program schedule be integrated,

i.e. , the individual contract milestones tied to each other, such that any delays occurring in one activity will be reflected throughout the entire program schedule, with a realistic completion date being reported. Narratives, tables, and/or graphs should accompany the updated master program schedule, basically detailing the current schedule status, delays and potential exposures, and recovery efforts. The following
information should also be included:

• Current overall project completion percentage vs. latest plan percentage.

• Completion percentages vs. latest plan percentages for major activities such as right-of-way, major or critical design contracts, major or critical construction contracts, and significant
force accounts or task orders. A schedule status description should also be included for each of these major or
critical elements.

• Any delays or potential exposures to milestone and final completion dates. The delays and exposures should be quantified and overall schedule impacts assessed. The reasons for the delays and exposures should be explained, and initiatives being analyzed or implemented in order to recover the
schedule should be detailed.

5. Project Cost. —An updated cost spreadsheet reflecting the current forecasted cost vs. the latest approved budget vs. the baseline budget should be included in this section. One way to track project cost is to show: (1) Baseline Budget, (2) Latest Approved Budget, (3) Current Forecasted Cost Estimate, (4) Expenditures or Commitments To Date, and (5) Variance
between Current Forecasted Cost and Latest Approved Budget. Line items should include all significant cost


### 23853 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 82 / Thursday, April 28, 2011 / Notices

centers, such as prior costs, right-ofway, preliminary engineering, environmental mitigation, general engineering consultant, section design contracts, construction administration, utilities, construction packages; force accounts/task orders, wrap-up insurance, construction contingencies, management contingencies, and other contingencies. The line items can be broken-up in enough detail such that specific areas of cost change can be sufficiently tracked and future improvements made to the overall cost estimating methodology. A Program
Total line should be included at the bottom of the spreadsheet. Narratives, tables, and/or graphs should accompany the updated cost spreadsheet, basically detailing the current cost status, reasons for cost deviations, impacts of cost overruns, and efforts to mitigate cost overruns. The following information should be provided:

• Reasons for each line item deviation from the approved budget, impacts resulting from the deviations, and initiatives being analyzed or implemented in order to recover any

cost overruns.

• Transfer of costs to and from contingency line items, and reasons supporting the transfers.

• Speculative cost changes that potentially may develop in the future, a quantified dollar range for each potential cost change, and the current status of the speculative change. Also, a comparison analysis to the available contingency amounts should be included, showing that reasonable and sufficient amounts of contingency remain to keep the project within the latest approved budget.

• Detailed cost breakdown of the general engineering consultant (GEC) services (if applicable), including such line items as contract amounts, task orders issued (amounts), balance remaining for tasks, and accrued (billable) costs.

• Federal obligations and/or TIFIA disbursements for the project, compared to planned obligations and
disbursements.

6. Project Funding Status. —The purpose of this section is to provide a status report on the non-TIGER and non TIGER II Discretionary Grant funds necessary to complete the project. This report section should include a status update of any legislative approvals or other actions necessary to provide the
non-TIGER and non TIGER II Discretionary Grant funds to the project. Such approvals might include legislative authority to charge user fees or set toll rates, or the commitment of local funding revenues to the project. In the event that there is an anticipated or actual project cost increase, the project funding status section should include a report on the anticipated or actual
source of funds to cover the cost increase and any significant issues identified with obtaining additional funding.

7. Project Quality. —The purpose of this section is to: (1) Summarize the Quality Assurance/Quality Control activities during the previous month (reporting period), and (2) highlight any significant items identified as being deficient in quality. Deficient items noted should be accompanied by reasons and specifics concerning the deficiencies, and corrective actions taken or planned. In addition, the agency or firm responsible for the
corrective action should be
documented. Planned corrective actions
should then be included as Action Items/Outstanding Issues.

8. Federal Financial Report (SF– 425). —The Federal Financial Report (SF–425) (available at http:// www.forms.gov/bgfPortal/ docDetails.do?dId=15149) is a financial reporting form used throughout the Federal Government Grant system. Grantees should complete this form and attach it to each quarterly Project Progress and Monitoring Report.

TIGER and TIGER II Discretionary Grant program grantees will submit an Annual Budget Review and Program Plan to the Government 60 days prior to the end of each Agreement year that they are receiving grant funds. Grantees should use the following structure when preparing the Annual Budget Review Report.

• Annual Budget Review Report

Æ Frequency: Yearly (60 days before the end of the Agreement year).

Æ Report covers: Upcoming Agreement year.

Æ Start: 60 days before first anniversary of grant award.

Æ End: Once construction is complete.

Æ Format/Fields and accompanying instructions (beyond project ID information):

1. Detailed Schedule of Activities.

— An updated master program schedule reflecting the current status of the program activities should be included in this section. A Gantt (bar) type chart is probably the most appropriate for annual reporting purposes.

2. Estimate of Specific Performance Objectives. —This section will discuss, what, if any performance objectives of the project will be achieved over the course of the upcoming Agreement Year and note any differences from the original project plan. 3. Forecasted Expenditures. —This section will discuss financial outlays that will occur in support of the project over the course of the upcoming Agreement Year and note any differences from the original project plan.

4. Schedule of Milestones for the Upcoming Agreement Year. —This section will discuss, what, if any project
milestones will be achieved over the course of the upcoming Agreement Year and the obligations associated with each milestone, noting any differences from the original project plan.

If there are no proposed deviations from the Approved Detailed Project Budget, the Annual Budget Review shall contain a statement stating such. The grantee will meet with the Government to discuss the Annual Budget Review and Program Plan. If there is an actual or projected project cost increase, the
annual submittal should include a written plan for providing additional sources of funding to cover the project budget shortfall or supporting
documentation of committed funds to
cover the cost increase. To the extent the annual budget update deviates from the approved project budget by more than 10 percent, then work proposed under the Annual Budget Review and Program Plan shall not commence until written approval from the Government
is received.

TIGER and TIGER II Discretionary Grant program grantees will submit Performance Measure Reports on the performance (or projected performance) of the project using the performance measures that the grantee and the Government selected through negations.

• Performance Measurement Reports

Æ Frequency: Quarterly (on the 20th
of the first month of the calendar quarter).

Æ Report covers: Previous quarter.

Æ Start: Once, upon award of grant; Quarterly, once construction complete.

Æ End: At the end of agreed upon performance measurement period.

Æ Format/Fields and accompanying instructions (beyond project ID information):

1. Performance Measures Narrative.

— Including a detailed description of data sources, assumptions, variability, and the estimated level of precision for each

measure.

2. Performance Measures Spreadsheet. —Government and grantee will agree on the format of the spreadsheet for each individual project. Measures (to be negotiated between grantees and the Government, individually) may include, but are not limited to: average tons handled/day;


### 23854 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 82 / Thursday, April 28, 2011 / Notices

average daily gross ton-miles (GTM); average container lifts per day (TEUs); containers transported on lines (TEUs); transit passenger miles and hours oftravel; transit passenger & nonpassenger counts; transit rider characteristics; average bike and or pedestrian users at key locations; average daily traffic (ADT) and average daily truck traffic (ADTT); average daily total train delay (minutes); average daily total (all vehicles) vehicle delay at crossings; transit service level; facility service level; average hourly (or peak & off-peak) vehicle travel time; average hourly (or peak & off-peak) buffer index; annual crash rates by type/severity; average slow order miles and average daily delay minutes due to slow orders; bridge condition (Sufficiency Rating);road closure/lost capacity time (lanehours).

3. [For final Report] Project

Outcomes. —Detailing Project successes
and/or the influence of external factors on Project expectations. Including an ex post examination of project

effectiveness in relation to the Preproject Report baselines.

A 60-day Federal Register notice was published on February 15, 2011 (76 FR 8804). Since the publication of the 60- day Federal Register notice, no
comments were received to the Docket (DOT–OST–2011–0019) and therefore no review of comments was required, so none was performed by the Department.

The Department’s estimated burden

for this information collection is the following:

Expected Number of Respondents:

126.

Frequency: Quarterly, and yearly.
Estimated Average Burden per Response: 8 hours for each Quarterly Progress and Monitoring Report; 8 hours for each Annual Budget Review; 8 hours for each Quarterly Performance Measurement Report.

Estimated Total Annual Burden: 9,072 hours.

Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended;

and 49 CFR 148.

Issued in Washington, DC on April 22,

2011.
Claire W. Barrett,
Chief Information Management and Privacy Officer.

[FR Doc. 2011–10184 Filed 4–27–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION** 

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**Notice of Intent To Rule on Request To Release Airport Property at the Dubois**  **Regional Airport, Reynoldsville, PA**

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) DOT.

**ACTION :**  Notice of request to release airport property.

**SUMMARY :**  The FAA proposes to rule and invite public comment on the release of land at the Dubois Regional Airport, Reynoldsville, Pennsylvania under the provisions of Section 47125(a) of Title 49 United States Code (U.S.C.).

**DATES :**  Comments must be received on or before May 31, 2011.

**ADDRESSES :**  Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered to the following address: Robert W. Shaffer, Manager, Dubois Regional Airport, 377 Aviation Way, Reynoldsville, PA 15851; and at the FAA Harrisburg Airports District Office: Lori K. Pagnanelli, Manager, Harrisburg Airports District Office, 3905 Hartzdale Dr., Suite 508, Camp Hill, PA 17011.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Lori Ledebohm, Community Planner, Harrisburg Airports District Office
location listed above.

The request to release property may be reviewed in person at this same
location.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  The FAA invites public comment on the request to release property at the Dubois Regional Airport under the provisions of Section 47125(a) of Title 49 U.S.C. On April 20, 2011, the FAA determined that the request to release property at the Dubois Regional Airport (DUJ), Pennsylvania submitted by the Clearfield-Jefferson Counties Regional Airport Authority (Authority) met the procedural requirements.

The following is a brief overview of the request:

The Authority requests the release ofreal property totaling 5.01 acres, of nonaeronautical airport property to AVERA Companies of Houston, TX. The land was originally purchased with Federal funds in 1988, AIP Grant 3–42–0023– 05–88. The undeveloped property is
located on the southeast corner within the Air Commerce Park, which is directly north of the main DuBois Regional Airport parking lot. AVERA Companies is proposing to develop the property and erect a building. The subject land does not serve an aeronautical purpose and is not needed for airport development, as shown on the Airport Layout Plan. All proceeds from the sale of property are to be used for the capital development of the airport. Fair Market Value (FMV) will be
obtained from the land sale and reinvested back into an AIP eligible project at the airport.

Any person may inspect the request by appointment at the FAA office address listed above. Interested persons are invited to comment on the proposed release from obligations. All comments will be considered by the FAA to the extent practicable.

Issued in Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, on April 20, 2011. Lori K. Pagnanelli, Manager, Harrisburg Airports District Office.

[FR Doc. 2011–10236 Filed 4–27–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Highway Administration**

**[FHWA Docket No. FHWA–2010–0010]**

**Reclassification of Motorcycles (Two and Three Wheeled Vehicles) in the**  **Guide to Reporting Highway Statistics**

**AGENCY :**  Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Final Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  This Notice announces the revision to FHWA’s guidance regarding State reporting of motorcycle registration information disseminated to the public in FHWA’s annual publication Guide to Reporting Highway

Statistics. The intent of this action is to improve FHWA’s motorcycle registration data to assist in the analysis of crash data relating to these vehicles. Thus, it is critical that the motorcycle registration data collected and published by FHWA is accurate, comprehensive, and timely. The

FHWA’s Guide to Reporting Highway Statistics (Guide) is the document that
FHWA uses to instruct States about what data is required by FHWA to perform its mission of informing Congress, the highway community, and the general public on a wide variety of highway extent, condition, use, and performance measures.

**DATES :**  Effective Date: 90 days after date of publication in the Federal Register

. **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Ralph Erickson, Highway Funding and Motor Fuels Team Leader, Office of Policy, HPPI–10, (202) 366–9235, or Adam Sleeter, Office of the Chief Counsel, (202) 366–8839, Federal Highway Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC