alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No: 14-008 February 11, 2014

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board to Hold Oral Argument

On Dresden Confirmatory Order March 6 in Morris, Ill

The Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB) will hear oral arguments March 6 in Morris, 

Ill., involving a challenge to the NRC’s October 2013 Confirmatory Order to the Dresden Nuclear 

Power Station. The ASLB is the independent body within the NRC that conducts adjudicatory hearings 

and renders decisions on legal challenges to licensing and enforcement actions.

The oral argument will start at 9:30 a.m. on March 6, in the Grundy County Court House at 111 

E Washington St. in Morris. Members of the public and media are welcome to observe the proceeding, 

but participation will be limited to the parties: Local Union No. 15, International Brotherhood of 

Electrical Workers; Exelon, the plant owner; and the NRC. Those planning to attend should arrive at 

least 15 minutes early to allow time for security screening, including searches of hand-carried items 

such as briefcases or backpacks. No signs will be permitted in the courtroom. The courthouse prohibits 

cameras of any kind, including cell phone cameras.

The union is challenging the Confirmatory Order, which involves changes to Dresden’s 

behavioral observation program. The NRC and Exelon used the Alternative Dispute Resolution process 

to formulate the program changes. The oral argument will examine whether the union has established a 

right to an evidentiary hearing on its challenge to the Confirmatory Order.

Documents regarding this board’s proceeding are available on the NRC’s Electronic Hearing 

Docket by clicking on the folder entitled “Dresden_50-237&50-249-EA” on the left side of the page. 

More information about the role of the ASLB in the NRC’s licensing and enforcement process is 

available on the NRC website.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
-----------------------------------------
I, Mark H. McKinnies, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ADA-ES, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: May 9, 2006

/s/ Mark H. McKinnies
---------------------
Name: Mark H. McKinnies
Title: CFO
James Anderson Assumes Role as Chief Financial Officer for CNA





CHICAGO, Illinois, August 1, 2018 - CNA today announced that James Anderson has assumed the role of Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer, effective August 1, 2018.  Anderson, who most recently served as Senior Vice President and Head of Financial Planning & Analysis and Corporate Development, succeeds D. Craig Mense, who announced his retirement earlier this year.





Anderson joined CNA in 2012 and has been a key member of the Finance leadership team since that time.  He has proven himself an astute financial leader with a strong drive for results.  Before joining CNA, Anderson spent nearly a decade in investment banking focused on the insurance industry, ultimately as a Managing Director at Macquarie Capital.  That experience followed five years of consulting at Accenture.





About CNA


CNA is the eighth largest commercial insurer in the United States.  CNA provides a broad range of standard and specialized property and casualty insurance products and services for businesses and professionals in the U.S., Canada, Europe and Asia, backed by 120 years of experience and more than $45 billion of assets.  For more information about CNA, visit our website at www.cna.com .





Follow CNA (NYSE: CNA) on: Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | YouTube








# # #





Press Contact:





Brandon Davis


CNA


Brandon.Davis@cna.com


312-822-5885 | 773-383-7166
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b) OR 15d-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

Jon E. Kirchner hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    He is thePresident and Chief Executive Officer of Digital Theater Systems, Inc.

2.    The Form 10-Qreport of Digital Theater Systems, Inc. for the quarterly period ended March 31,2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

3.    The information contained in the Form 10-Qreport of Digital Theater Systems, Inc. for the quarterly period ended March 31,2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Digital Theater Systems, Inc.
| Dated: May 10, 2005 |   |                                  |
|-------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                          | By:    | /s/ JON E.  KIRCHNER                  |
|                          |   | Jon E. Kirchner                       |
|                          |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided toDigital Theater Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Digital TheaterSystems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission uponrequest.

----
Exhibit 13.2
**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT****Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**
     In connection with the Annual Report of Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. (the“Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the SEC on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Wen Chung Lin, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:
     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and
     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: June 10, 2005      By:     /s/ Wen Chung Lin      Name: Wen Chung Lin  Title:   Chief Financial Officer
* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe SEC or its staff upon request.
§ 1205.6 Warning label for reel-type and rotary power mowers. ( a ) *General.* Walk-behind power lawn mowers shall be labeled on the blade housing or, in the absence of a blade housing, on other blade shielding or on an adjacent supporting structure or assembly, with the warning label shown in Fig. 7. The label shall be at least 3.25 in (82.5 mm) high and 4 in (102 mm) wide, and the lettering and symbol shall retain the same size relation to each other and to the label as shown in Fig. 7.
( b ) *Rotary mowers.* Walk-behind rotary mowers shall have one label as shown in Fig. 7, on the blade housing. The label shall be located as close as possible to any discharge opening, or, if there is no discharge opening, in a position that is conspicuous to an operator in the normal operating position.
( c ) *Reel-type mowers.* Walk-behind power reel-type mowers shall have one label as shown in Fig. 7, located as close to the center of the cutting width of the blade as possible. However, in the absence of a suitable mounting surface near the center of the cutting width, the label shall be placed on the nearest suitable mounting surface to the center of the cutting width.
[44 FR 10024, Feb. 15, 1979, as amended at 45 FR 86417, Dec. 31, 1980]
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MediciNova, Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2005 (the Report), I, Shintaro Asako, Vice
President, Accounting and Financial Reporting of MediciNova, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MediciNova, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.



This certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



Date: August 15, 2005By:

/s/ Shintaro AsakoShintaro AsakoVice President, Accounting and Financial Reporting (Principal Accounting Officer)
EPA’s RESPONSE to Summary of Interagency Working Comments on Draft 

Language under EO12866/13563 Interagency Review. Subject to Further 

Policy Review.

1 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Proposed Rule 

Protection of Visibility: Amendments to Requirements for State Plans 

RIN 2060-AS55 

Reviewer recommends revising the language below as provided in redline-strikeout: 

I. Changes to FLM Consultation Requirements 

The EPA believes that state consultation with FLMs is a critical part of the creation of 

quality SIPs. As mentioned earlier, the EPA is proposing to extend the FLM consultation 

requirements of §51.308(i)(2) to progress reports that are not SIP revisions. In addition, the EPA 

believes further edits to §51.308(i)(2) are necessary because the current requirement for 

consultation at least 60 days prior to a public hearing may not occur sufficiently early in the 

state’s planning process to meaningfully inform the state’s development of the long-term 

strategy. This proposed rule change would add a requirement that such consultation occur early 

enough to allow the state time for full consideration of FLM input, but no fewer than 60 days 

prior to a public hearing or other public comment opportunity. A consultation opportunity that 

takes place no less than 120 days prior to a public hearing or other public comment opportunity 

would be deemed to have been “early enough.” 

Finally, the EPA notes that pursuant to the existing provisions of §51.307(a), the 

permitting authority FLMs isare also required to be consulted with FLMs regarding to new 

source review of any new major stationary source or major modification that would be 

constructed in an area that is nonattainment, designated attainment or unclassified that may affect 
EPA’s RESPONSE to Summary of Interagency Working Comments on Draft 

Language under EO12866/13563 Interagency Review. Subject to Further 

Policy Review.

2 

visibility in any Class I Federal area. As required by the regulations, that consultation needs to be 

timely and include sharing with the FLMs all pertinent documents related to the proposed new 

stationary source or major modification. The practice of limiting the notification to FLMs to 

only new stationary sources or major modifications within 100 kilometers is not appropriate and 

misapplies existing EPA guidance. Because the existing regulations already provide for this level 

of substantive FLM consultation, Nno regulatory changes are being proposed to these 

consultation requirements.
March 26, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

KAREEM MCCANE HUEY, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00151-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### In the Matter of the Application of John C. McEachen.

Present — Peck, ,P. J., Dore, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3409 

To limit the authority of the Secretary of the Interior to issue regulations 

before December 31, 2013, under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2011 

Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To limit the authority of the Secretary of the Interior to 

issue regulations before December 31, 2013, under the 

Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Coal Miner Employ5 ment and Domestic Energy Infrastructure Protection 

6 Act’’. 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3409 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON AUTHORITY TO ISSUE REGULA2 TIONS UNDER THE SURFACE MINING CON3 TROL AND RECLAMATION ACT OF 1977. 

4 The Secretary of the Interior may not, before Decem5 ber 31, 2013, issue or approve any proposed or final regu6 lation under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation 

7 Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.) that would— 

8 (1) adversely impact employment in coal mines 

9 in the United States; 

10 (2) cause a reduction in revenue received by the 

11 Federal Government or any State, tribal, or local 

12 government, by reducing through regulation the 

13 amount of coal in the United States that is available 

14 for mining; 

15 (3) reduce the amount of coal available for do16 mestic consumption or for export; 

17 (4) designate any area as unsuitable for surface 

18 coal mining and reclamation operations; or 

19 (5) expose the United States to liability for tak20 ing the value of privately owned coal through regula21 tion. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)   In connection with the amended quarterly Report of Hitor Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Ken Martin, CEO and CAO of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   [exhibit3233109002.gif]  _______________________________ Ken Martin, CEO, CAO Dated:  May 15, 2009
§ 1021.14 Environmental impact statement. ( a ) Draft and final EIS's, unless there is a compelling reason to do otherwise, shall conform to the recommended format specified in § 1502.10 of the NEPA regulations and shall contain the material required by §§ 1502.11 through 1502.18 of those regulations.
( b ) It may be necessary to include in an EIS a description of effects which are not effects on the natural or physical environment, but rather are, for example, purely economic or health effects. For this reason, an EIS may include issues and facts that are thoroughly analyzed in other comprehensive CPSC documents such as hazard analyses, economic impact analyses, or analyses of impact on particular age groups among consumers. In such cases, the EIS shall not duplicate the other documents, but rather shall cite and summarize from them. A list of background documents and sources of data cited in the EIS shall appear at the end of every EIS.
###### Editorial Note on Part 922

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

#### § 922.200 Boundary.

The Mallows Bay-Potomac River National Marine Sanctuary consists of an area of approximately 18 square miles of waters of the state of Maryland and the submerged lands thereunder, over, around, and under the underwater cultural resources in the Potomac River. The precise boundary coordinates are listed in appendix A to this subpart. The western boundary of the sanctuary approximates the border between the Commonwealth of Virginia and the State of Maryland along the western side of the Potomac River and begins at Point 1 north of the mouth of Aquia Creek in Stafford County, Virginia, near Brent Point. From this point the boundary continues to the north approximating the border between Virginia and Maryland cutting across the mouths of streams and creeks passing through the points in numerical order until it reaches Point 40 north of Tank Creek. From this point the sanctuary boundary continues east across the Potomac River in a straight line towards Point 41 until it intersects the Maryland shoreline just north of Sandy Point in Charles County, Maryland. From this intersection the sanctuary boundary then follows the Maryland shoreline south around Mallows Bay, Blue Banks, and Wades Bay cutting across the mouths of creeks and streams along the eastern shoreline of the Potomac River until it intersects the line formed between Point 42 and Point 43 just south of Smith Point. Finally, from this intersection the sanctuary boundary crosses the Potomac River to the west in a straight line until it reaches Point 43 north of the mouth of Aquia Creek in Stafford County, Virginia, near Brent Point.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 228 (Monday, November 29, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 69349]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26317]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 228 / Monday, November 29, 2004 / 
Notices

[[Page 69349]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Public Meetings of the Black Hills National Forest Advisory Board

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Black Hills National Forest Advisory Board (NFAB) will 
hold meetings to become informed about Black Hills National Forest 
issues and to consider those issues so as to make management 
recommendations to the forest supervisor. The meetings are open, and 
the public may attend any part of the meetings.

Dates and Agenda Issues:

    <bullet> Wednesday, December 8, 2004 from 1 to 5 p.m.--Phase II 
Amendment/Board Bylaw Changes.
    <bullet> Wednesday, January 5, 2005 from 1 to 5 p.m.--Phase II 
Amendment.
    <bullet> Wednesday, February 16, 2005 from 1 to 5 p.m.--To be 
announced through local news media.
    <bullet> Wednesday, Marcy 16, 2005 from 1 to 5 p.m.--To be 
announced through local news media.
    <bullet> Wednesday, April 20, 2005 from 1 to 5 p.m.--To be 
announced through local news media.
    <bullet> Wednesday, May 18, 2005 from 1 to 5 p.m.--To be announced 
through local news media.

ADDRESSES: SDSU West River Ag Center, 1905 Plaza Boulevard, Rapid City, 
SD.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frank Carroll, Black Hills National 
Forest, 25041 North Highway 16, Custer, SD 57730, (605) 673-9200.

    Dated: November 22, 2004.
Dorothy FireCloud,
Black Hills National Forest Acting Deputy Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 04-26317 Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
§ 1115.11 Imputed knowledge. ( a ) In evaluating whether or when a subject firm should have reported, the Commission will deem a subject firm to have obtained reportable information when the information has been received by an official or employee who may reasonably be expected to be capable of appreciating the significance of the information. (See § 1115.14(b).)
( b ) In evaluating whether or when a subject firm should have reported, the Commission will deem a subject firm to know what a reasonable person acting in the circumstances in which the firm finds itself would know. Thus, the subject firm shall be deemed to know what it would have known if it had exercised due care to ascertain the truth of complaints or other representations. This includes the knowledge a firm would have if it conducted a reasonably expeditious investigation in order to evaluate the reportability of a death or grievous bodily injury or other information. (See § 1115.14.)