### 75801 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 244 / Friday, December 19, 2014 / Notices

www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/ eisdata.html. EIS No. 20140358, Draft EIS, HUD, CA,

Sunnydale-Velasco HOPE SF Master Plan Project, Comment Period Ends: 02/17/2015, Contact: Eugene Flannery
415–701–5598. EIS No. 20140359, Draft Supplement,

FHWA, DC, South Capitol Street, Comment Period Ends: 02/02/2015, Contact: Michael Hicks 202–219–
3513. EIS No. 20140360, Draft EIS, USFWS,

TX, Southern Edwards Plateau Habitat Conservation Plan, Comment Period Ends: 03/fxsp0;20/2015, Contact: Vanessa Burge 505–248–
6420. EIS No. 20140361, Final EIS, USFS, CO,

White River National Forest Oil and Gas Leasing, Review Period Ends: 02/ 10/ 2015, Contact: Sarah Hankens
970–625–6840. EIS No. 20140362, Final EIS, USFS, VA,

Revised Land and Resource Management Plan for the George Washington National Forest, Review Period Ends: 01/20/2015, Contact: Karen Overcash 540–265–5175. EIS No. 20140363, Draft EIS, FHWA,

MN, US Highway 53 from Virginia to Eveleth, Comment Period Ends: 02/ 02/2015, Contact: Philip Forst 651–
291–6100. EIS No. 20140364, Draft EIS, APHIS, 00,

Feral Swine Damage Management: A National Approach, Comment Period Ends: 02/02/2015, Contact: Kimberly K. Wagner 608–837–2727. EIS No. 20140365, Final EIS, USACE,

TX, Dallas Floodway Project, Review Period Ends: 01/20/2015, Contact: Marcia Hackett 817–886–1373. EIS No. 20140366, Final EIS, NPS, DC,

Anacostia Park Wetlands and Resident Canada Goose Management Plan, Review Period Ends: 01/20/ 2015, Contact: Robert Mocko 202–
690–5170. EIS No. 20140367, Draft EIS, USFS, OR,

Antelope Grazing Allotments, Comment Period Ends: 02/02/2015, Contact: Lucas Phillips 541–947–
2151. EIS No. 20140368, Draft EIS, BLM, OR,

Land use Plan Amendments for the Boardman to Hemingway Transmission Line Project, Comment Period Ends: 03/19/2015, Contact: Tamara Gertsch 307–775–6115. EIS No. 20140369, Final EIS, NOAA,

CA, Cordell Bank and Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuaries Expansion, Review Period Ends: 01/20/2015, Contact: Helene Scalliet 301–713–7281. EIS No. 20140370, Draft Supplement,

USN, WA, Northwest Training and Testing, Comment Period Ends: 02/ 02/2015, Contact: John Mosher 360–
257–3234. EIS No. 20140371, Draft EIS, USACE,

CA, South San Francisco Bay Shoreline Phase I, Comment Period Ends: 02/02/2015, Contact: William DeJager 415–503–6866. EIS No. 20140372, Draft EIS, DOE, 00,

Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Project, Comment Period Ends: 02/02/2015, Contact: Jane Summerson 505–845–4091.

Amended Notices EIS No. 20140306, Draft EIS, USACE,

CA, River Islands at Lathrop, Phase 2B, Comment Period Ends: 01/23/ 2015, Contact: William Guthrie 916–
557–5269. Revision to the FR Notice Published 10/24/2014; Extending Comment Period from 12/08/2014 to 01/23/2015.

Dated: December 16, 2014.
Dawn Roberts Management Analyst, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2014–29784 Filed 12–18–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0763; FRL–9918–44]**

**Registration Review; Pesticide Dockets Opened for Review and**  **Comment**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  With this notice, EPA is opening the public comment period for several registration reviews. Registration review is EPA’s periodic review of pesticide registrations to ensure that each pesticide continues to satisfy the statutory standard for registration, that is, the pesticide can perform its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on human health or the environment. Registration review dockets contain information that will assist the public in understanding the types of information and issues that the Agency may consider during the course of registration reviews. Through this program, EPA is ensuring that each pesticide’s registration is based on current scientific and other knowledge, including its effects on human healthand the environment. For flufenpyrethyl, EPA is seeking comment on the preliminary work plan, the ecological problem formulation, and the human health draft risk assessment. For Sodium Fluoride, Yellow Mustard Seed and Sulfonic Acid, EPA is seeking comment on the Combined Work Plan, Summary Document, and Proposed Interim Registration Review Decision, which includes the human health and ecological risk assessments. This notice also announces a registration review case closure for thiacloprid.

**DATES :**  Comments must be received on or before February 17, 2015.

**ADDRESSES :**  Submit your comments identified by the docket identification (ID) number for the specific pesticide of interest provided in the table in Unit III.A., by one of the following methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.

• Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the instructions at http:// www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/ dockets.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :** 

For pesticide specific information
contact: The Chemical Review Manager for the pesticide of interest identified in the table in Unit III.A.

For general information contact: Richard Dumas, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone number: (703) 308–8015; fax number: (703) 308–8005; email address: dumas.richard@epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
I. General Information A. Does this action apply to me?

This action is directed to the public in general, and may be of interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human health, farmworker, and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry; pesticide users; and members of the public interested in the sale, distribution, or use of pesticides. Since others also may be interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific


### 75802 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 244 / Friday, December 19, 2014 / Notices

entities that may be affected by this action. B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or CD–ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD–ROM the specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.

2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting your comments, see the commenting tips at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/ comments.html.

3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to achieve environmental justice, the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of any group, including minority and/or low income populations, in the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies. To help address potential environmental justice issues, the Agency seeks information on any groups or segments of the population who, as a result of their location, cultural practices, or other factors, may have atypical or disproportionately high and adverse human health impacts or environmental effects from exposure to the pesticide(s) discussed in this notice, compared to the general population.
II. Authority

EPA is initiating its review of the pesticides identified in this notice pursuant to section 3(g) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) (7 U.S.C. 136a(g)) and the Procedural Regulations for Registration Review at 40 CFR part 155, subpart C. Section 3(g) of FIFRA provides, among other things, that the registrations of pesticides are to be reviewed every 15 years. Under FIFRA, a pesticide product may be registered or remain registered only if it meets the statutory standard for registration given in FIFRA section 3(c)(5) (7 U.S.C. 136a(c)(5)). When used in accordance with widespread and commonly recognized practice, the pesticide product must perform its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on the environment; that is, without any unreasonable risk to man or the environment, or a human dietary risk from residues that result from the use of a pesticide in or on food.
III. Registration Reviews A. What action is the agency taking?

As directed by FIFRA section 3(g), EPA is reviewing the pesticide registrations identified in the table in this unit to assure that they continue to satisfy the FIFRA standard for registration—that is, they can still be used without unreasonable adverse effects on human health or the environment. A pesticide’s registration review begins when the Agency establishes a docket for the pesticide’s registration review case and opens the docket for public review and comment. At present, EPA is opening registration review dockets for the cases identified in the following table.



### TABLE 

### 1—R EGISTRATION 

### R EVIEW 

### DOCKETS 

### O PENING

Registration review case name and No. Docket ID No. Chemical review manager or regulatory action leader, telephone No., email address

3-methyl-cyclohexen-1-one (Case

6074). EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0671 Gina Burnett, (703) 605–0513, burnett.gina@epa.gov

.
Alkyl trimethylenediamines (ATMD)

(Case 3014). EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0656 Donna Kamarei, (703) 347–0443 kamarei.donna@epa.gov

. Boscalid (Case 7039) ........................ EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0199 Maria Piansay, (703) 308–8063 piansay.maria@epa.gov

. Dikegulac sodium (Case 3061) ......... EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0771 Matthew Manupella, (703) 347–0411 manupella.matthew@epa.gov

. Ethoxyquin (Case 0003) .................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0780 Khue Nguyen, (703) 347–0248, nguyen.khue@epa.gov

. Fenpyroximate (Case 7432) .............. EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0572 Miguel Zavala, (703) 347–0504 zavala.miguel@epa.gov

. Flonicamid (Case 7436) .................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0777 Ricardo Jones, (703) 347–0493, jones.ricardo@epa.gov

. Fluazifop butyl, isomers (Case 2285) EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0779 Matthew Manupella, (703) 347–0411 manupella.matthew@epa.gov

. Flufenpyr-ethyl (Case 7262) .............. EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0768 Steven Snyderman, (703) 347–0249 snyderman.steven@epa.gov

. HHT (Grotan) (Case 3074) ............... EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0654 Tina Pham, (703) 308–0125, pham.thao@epa.gov

. Metolachlor & s-Metolachlor (Case

0001). EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0772 Steven Snyderman, (703) 347–0249 snyderman.steven@epa.gov

.
Napthaleneacetic acid (Case 0379) .. EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0773 Christina Scheltema, (703) 308–2201, scheltema.christina@epa.gov

. Oxadiazon (Case 2485) .................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0782 Katherine St. Clair, (703) 347–8778 stclair.katherine@epa.gov

. Oxyfluorfen (Case 2490) ................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0778 Benjamin Askin, (703) 347–0503, askin.benjamin@epa.gov

. Pentachlorophenol (Case 2505) ....... EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0653 Sandra O’Neill, (703) 347–0141 oneill.sandra@epa.gov

. Sodium fluoride (Case 3132) ............ EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0655 SanYvette Williams, (703) 305–7702, williams.sanyvette@epa.gov

. Sulfonic acid salts (Case 7619) ........ EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0762 Roy Johnson, (703) 347–0492, johnson.roy@epa.gov

. Triclopyr (Case 2710) ........................ EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0576 Brittany Pruitt, (703) 347–0289, pruitt.brittany@epa.gov

. Yellow mustard seed (Case 7618) .... EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0762 Roy Johnson, (703) 347–0492, johnson.roy@epa.gov

.

For flufenpyr-ethyl (Case 7262), EPA is seeking comment on the preliminary work plan, the ecological problem formulation, and the human health draft risk assessment. For Sodium Fluoride (Case 3132), Yellow Mustard Seed (Case 7618) and Sulfonic Acid (Case 7619), EPA is seeking comment on the Combined Work Plan, Summary Document, and Proposed Interim Registration Review Decision, which includes the human health and ecological risk assessments. This notice also announces 1 case closure. On August 6, 2014, the Agency issued a product cancellation order in the Federal Register (79 FR 45798; FRL– 9914–09) for all thiacloprid product registrations. Due to the cancellation of all registered thiacloprid products in the United States, the Agency closed the registration review case for thiacloprid. The ‘‘Notice of Registration Review Case Closure for Thiacloprid’’ is available in docket EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0218 at http://www.regulations.gov

.


### 75803 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 244 / Friday, December 19, 2014 / Notices

B. Docket Content

1. Review dockets. The registration review dockets contain information that the Agency may consider in the course of the registration review. The Agency may include information from its files including, but not limited to, the following information:

• An overview of the registration review case status.

• A list of current product registrations and registrants.

• Federal Register notices regarding any pending registration actions.

• Federal Register notices regarding current or pending tolerances.

• Risk assessments.

• Bibliographies concerning current registrations.

• Summaries of incident data.

• Any other pertinent data or information.

Each docket contains a document summarizing what the Agency currently knows about the pesticide case and a preliminary work plan for anticipated data and assessment needs. Additional documents provide more detailed information. During this public comment period, the Agency is asking that interested persons identify any additional information they believe the Agency should consider during the registration reviews of these pesticides. The Agency identifies in each docket the areas where public comment is specifically requested, though comment in any area is welcome.

2. Other related information. More information on these cases, including the active ingredients for each case, may be located in the registration review schedule on the Agency’s Web site at http://www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/ registration

_review/schedule.htm. Information on the Agency’s registration review program and its implementing regulation may be seen at http:// www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/registration

_ review

.

3. Information submission requirements. Anyone may submit data or information in response to this document. To be considered during a pesticide’s registration review, the submitted data or information must meet the following requirements:

• To ensure that EPA will consider data or information submitted, interested persons must submit the data or information during the comment period. The Agency may, at its discretion, consider data or information submitted at a later date.

• The data or information submitted must be presented in a legible and useable form. For example, an English translation must accompany any material that is not in English and a written transcript must accompany any information submitted as an audiographic or videographic record. Written material may be submitted in paper or electronic form.

• Submitters must clearly identify the source of any submitted data or information.

• Submitters may request the Agency to reconsider data or information that the Agency rejected in a previous review. However, submitters must explain why they believe the Agency should reconsider the data or information in the pesticide’s registration review.

As provided in 40 CFR 155.58, the registration review docket for each pesticide case will remain publicly accessible through the duration of the registration review process; that is, until all actions required in the final decision on the registration review case have been completed.

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.
Dated: December 10, 2014. Richard P. Keigwin, Jr., Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2014–29578 Filed 12–18–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION** 

**[OMB 3060–0633]**

**Information Collection Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications**  **Commission**

**AGENCY :**  Federal Communications Commission.

**ACTION :**  Notice and request for
comments.

**SUMMARY :**  As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, and as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– 3520), the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or the Commission) invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collection. Comments are requested concerning: whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; the accuracy of the Commission’s burden estimate; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and ways to further reduce the information collection burden on small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees. The FCC may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the PRA that does not display a valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number.

**DATES :**  Written PRA comments should be submitted on or before February 17, 2015. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments, but find it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this notice, you should advise the contact listed below as soon as possible.

**ADDRESSES :**  Direct all PRA comments to Cathy Williams, FCC, via email PRA@ fcc.gov and to Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  For additional information about the information collection, contact Cathy Williams at (202) 418–2918.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 

OMB Control No.: 3060–0633. Title: 73.1230, 74.165, 74.432, 74,564, 74.664, 74.765, 74.832, 74.1265, Posting or Filing of Station License.

Form No.: Not applicable. Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.

Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities; Not-for-profit Institutions; Federal Government and State, local or tribal government.

Number of Respondents and Responses: 2,784 respondents and 2,784
responses.

Estimated Time per Response: 0.083 hours.

Frequency of Response: On occasion reporting requirement, recordkeeping requirement, and third party disclosure requirement.

Obligation to Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefits. The statutory authority for this collection of information is contained in Section 154(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.

Total Annual Burden: 231 hours. Total Annual Cost: $24,860. Privacy Act Impact Assessment: No impact(s)

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: In general there is no need for confidentiality with this collection of information.

Needs and Uses: On June 2, 2014, the Commission released a Second Report