alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

** **

I, Richard Thon, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewedthis quarterly report on 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 ofProUroCare Medical Inc.;

 

2.     Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.     Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.     The registrant’sother certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b)             evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.     The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):

 

a)              allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)             anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
|                    | /s/    Richard Thon   |
|-------------------------|--------------------------------------|
| Date: May 10, 2006 | Name:  Richard Thon             |
|                    | Title:  Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
No: I-14-035 September 19, 2014

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330

Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331

NRC, Army Corps to Seek Public Comments on Draft Environmental Report

for PSEG Early Site Permit; Meetings Scheduled for Oct. 1

Nuclear Regulatory Commission and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers staff will receive 

comments Oct. 1 in Carneys Point, N.J., on a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for an 

Early Site Permit (ESP) application for a site near Salem, N.J.

PSEG submitted an application on May 25, 2010, for an ESP for a site adjacent to the Salem 

and Hope Creek nuclear power plants, which it owns and operates. The site is located in Hancocks 

Bridge, N.J.

The meetings are scheduled for 1-4 p.m. and 7-10 p.m. in the theater at Davidow Hall at Salem 

Community College, 460 Hollywood Ave., in Carneys Point (Salem County). Formal comments will 

only be accepted during the meetings. NRC and Corps staff will also host informal discussions for one 

hour prior to the start of each meeting. Parking will be available in Lot “A” on campus.

An ESP, if approved, allows a company to address site-related issues, including environmental 

impacts, for the possible future construction and operation of a nuclear power plant at a predetermined 

site. No specific type of reactor design has to be selected when an ESP application is being pursued and 

a company is not obligated to proceed with a project should the NRC grant approval. Under an ESP, a 

company has up to 20 years to decide whether to seek a license from the NRC to build and operate a 

reactor, or reactors, on the designated site.

As part of its review of the application, the NRC and The Corps’ Philadelphia District issued a 

DEIS for the application on Aug. 22, 2014. The Corps is participating as a cooperating agency in the 

preparation of the EIS because certain proposed building activities require the Corps’ authorization.

The preliminary conclusion is that assessed environmental impacts would not prevent the 

issuance of an ESP for the project. The NRC staff’s conclusion is based on an independent review of an 

environmental report submitted by PSEG, taking into account consultations with federal, state, tribal 

and local agencies and comments received during the public scoping process begun in 2010.

The public comment period on the DEIS will be open until Nov. 6, 2014. A copy of the DEIS 

and more information on the PSEG ESP application are available on the NRC website.
|   | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Richard C. Carlson       |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| Richard      C. Carlson      |   |
| Chief      Executive Officer |   |
| August      16, 2010         |   |
|                         |   |
| /s/ Richard B. Thon          |   |
| Richard      B. Thon         |   |
| Chief      Financial Officer |   |
| August      16, 2010         |   |

----
#### In the Matter of Eugene Turner, Petitioner, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[821 NYS2d 309]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

After receiving anonymous information that petitioner had allegedly raped another inmate, a correction sergeant interviewed a number of inmates and spoke to the victim of the sexual assault who reported that petitioner had forced him to submit to anal intercourse. As. a result, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with committing a sexual offense, engaging *1120in inappropriate physical contact, being out of place and making threats. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of the first two charges, but not of the latter two. The determination was affirmed on administrative appeal, resulting in this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the documentary evidence and testimony adduced at the hearing as well as the confidential testimony considered by the Hearing Officer in camera, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt *(see Matter of Chaney v Goord,*26 AD3d 605, 606 [2006]; *Matter of Horton v Allard,*25 AD3d 1048, 1049 [2006]). Contrary to petitioner’s claim, the Hearing Officer properly assessed the reliability of the confidential testimony. The Hearing Officer independently evaluated the credibility of the confidential inmate witness by conducting a personal interview *(see Matter of Camacho v Goord,*18 AD3d 1046, 1047 [2005]). The Hearing Officer was not required to personally interview each of the inmates who implicated petitioner as the perpetrator of the assault because the investigating sergeant who questioned them gave detailed confidential testimony of his investigation, thereby allowing the Hearing Officer to make his own independent assessment of the inmates’ reliability *(see Matter of Pabon v Goord,*6 AD3d 833, 834 [2004]). As substantial evidence supports respondent’s determination, we find no reason to disturb it.

Cardona, P.J., Spain, Mugglin, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
### Part C—Duration of Program
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 FORM 10-K/A
 (Amendment No. 1)
 (Mark One)
 þ
    
    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the year ended December 31, 2008
 OR
 o
    
    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 Commission File No. 0-30821
 TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, INC.
  Maryland
    
    52-1526369(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)275 West Street, Annapolis, MD
    
    21401(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 (410) 263-7616
   o þ
 o þ
 þ o
 o o
 o
  Large accelerated filer o
    
    Accelerated filer þ
    
    Non-accelerated filer o
    
    Smaller reporting company o
 o þ
   DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
 Document
    
    Part of 10-K into which incorporatedPortions of the registrants Proxy Statement for the
    
    Part IIIAnnual Meeting of Stockholders to be held June 11, 2009




---



##### 



EXPLANATORY NOTE
   SIGNATURES
  TeleCommunication Systems, Inc.By:
    /s/  Thomas M. Brandt, Jr.Thomas M. Brandt, Jr.Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer)




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 ExhibitNumbers
    
    Description12.1
    
    
    Supplemental Financial Statement Schedule II31.1
    
    
    Certification of CEO required by the Securities and
Exchange Commission Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)31.2
    
    
    Certification of CEO required by the Securities and
Exchange Commission Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)32.1
    
    
    Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 200232.2
    
    
    Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
#### The Ralph Klonick Corporation, Appellant, v. Berkshire Life Insurance Company, Respondent.

*900Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Kimball and Piper, JJ.
EXHIBIT 3.4


                               SECOND AMENDMENT TO
                               OPERATING AGREEMENT
                                       FOR
                       PERFORMANCE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC
                     A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY

THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE OPERATING AGREEMENT FOR PERFORMANCE CAPITAL
MANAGEMENT, LLC, a California limited liability company (this "Second
Amendment") is made by and among PERFORMANCE ASSET MANAGEMENT FUND, LTD., a
California limited liability company, PERFORMANCE ASSET MANAGEMENT FUND II,
LTD., a California limited liability company, PERFORMANCE ASSET MANAGEMENT FUND
III, LTD., a California limited liability company, PERFORMANCE ASSET MANAGEMENT
FUND IV, LTD., a California limited liability company, and PERFORMANCE ASSET
MANAGEMENT FUND V, LTD. This Second Amendment amends that certain Operating
Agreement for PERFORMANCE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, a California limited
liability company (the "Operating Agreement"). Except as otherwise amended
hereby, the Operating Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.
Capitalized terms that are used in this Second Amendment and are defined in the
Operating Agreement, as amended, shall have the same meanings herein as therein
unless otherwise provided herein. The Operating Agreement is hereby amended in
the following respects only.

THE FOLLOWING SECTION IS HEREBY ADDED TO THE OPERATING AGREEMENT TO READ IN FULL
AS SET FORTH HEREIN:

5.2.8 Classification of Directors. The Directors shall be divided into two
classes, with each class to be as nearly equal in number as possible, as
specified by resolution of the Board of Directors or, if the Directors in office
constitute fewer than a quorum of the Board of Directors, by the affirmative
vote of a majority of all the Directors in office. The term of office of the
initial Directors of the first class shall expire at the first annual meeting of
Members after their election. The term of office of the initial Directors of the
second class shall expire at the second annual meeting after their election. At
each annual meeting after such classification, a number of Directors equal to
the number of the class whose term expires at the time of such meeting shall be
elected to hold office until the second succeeding annual meeting. Absent his or
her death, resignation or removal, a Director shall continue to serve despite
the expiration of the Director's term until his or her successor shall have been
elected and qualified or until there is a decrease in the number of Directors.




SECOND AMENDMENT TO OPERATING AGREEMENT - PAGE 1


<PAGE>
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Members of PERFORMANCE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, a
California limited liability company, adopted and approved this Second
Amendment, in accordance with the Operating Agreement, as amended, on the 9th
day of June, 2003.


                           /s/ William D. Constantino
                        ------------------------------------------
                        William D. Constantino Chief Legal Officer





SECOND AMENDMENT TO OPERATING AGREEMENT - PAGE 2


<PAGE>
Board Coverage Decision

2010-44.6

Jersey Central Terminal Railroad % Consolidated

Rail Corporation

Employer Coverage Terminated*

No Decision Published

BA # 4389
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Walter W. Kennedy, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction affirmed. All concur. (Appeal from a judgment convicting defendant of the crime of criminal negligence.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 10.2**

 

[MINDSPEED LETTERHEAD]

 

April 9,2008

 

SimonBiddiscombe

NewportBeach

 

Re:          Special Bonus

 

DearSimon:

 

OnNovember 23, 2007 Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. agreed to pay you a “SpecialBonus” of $100,000, less applicable state and federal tax withholding, inexchange for twelve months of continued service to the company.  In the event that you were to voluntarilyleave the company or were terminated for cause on or prior to November 23,2008, you agreed to repay to the company 100% of the gross amount of the “SpecialBonus” within thirty (30) days of such termination of employment.

 

TheCompensation Committee of the Board of Directors has agreed to consider 50% ofthe bonus to be earned upon your termination date, leaving your repaymentobligation to Mindspeed at $50,000.  Thisis contingent upon your good faith efforts to assist Mindspeed in transitionactivity to a new CFO and you agreeing in this letter to the following nohire/no solicit promise (as a reminder you will still be bound by the agreementscontained in the Employment Agreement you signed when you became an employee ofConexant/Mindspeed):

 

NoSolicit – No Hire Promise.  You agree, for a period of one year beginningon April 22, 2008, that you will not, either directly or through others,solicit, raid or attempt to solicit any employee of Mindspeed to terminate hisor her relationship with the company in order to become an employee to or forany other person or entity.  In addition,you promise not to hire any person who, as of the date of this letter, is amember of Mindspeed’s Finance/Legal organization.  You further agree that if the no solicit – nohire promise is breached, you will compensate Mindspeed for such breach bypaying to Mindspeed a sum equal to $50,000 (100% of the amount of the “SpecialBonus” that had been considered to be earned).

 

Simon,your contributions to Mindspeed are greatly appreciated and I look forward toyour help as we transition to a new CFO.

 

Sincerely,

 

MindspeedTechnologies, Inc.

 

 
| By:                             | /s/  Raouf Halim |   |
|---------------------------------|------------------|--------|
| Name:  Raouf Halim              |
| Title:  Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

Agreedand Accepted this 15th day of April, 2008.

 
| By: | /s/ Simon Biddiscombe |   |
|-----|-----------------------|--------|

 

----
#### James Rae Clarke v. J. Howard Taylor.

Motion for leave to appeal denied, with ten dollars costs. Present—Ingraham, P. J,, Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
### Part B—General Provisions Respecting National Research Institutes
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Riverside 95th Street, Inc., Appellant, against William W. Mills, et al., Constituting the Tax Commission of the City of New York, Respondents. [230 Riverside Drive, Borough of Manhattan.]

No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
§ 1116.3 Persons who must report under section 37. A manufacturer of a consumer product must report if: ( a ) A particular model of the product is the subject of at least 3 civil actions filed in Federal or State Court;
( b ) Each suit alleges the involvement of that particular model in death or grievous bodily injury;
( c ) The manufacturer is— ( 1 ) A party to, or
( 2 ) Is involved in the defense of or has notice of each action prior to entry of a final order, and is involved in the discharge of any obligation owed to plaintiff under the settlement of or in satisfaction of the judgment after adjudication in each of the suits; and
( d ) During one of the 24-month periods defined in § 1116.2(a), each of the three actions results in either a final settlement involving the manufacturer or in a court judgment in favor of the plaintiff.
For reporting purposes, a multiple plaintiff suit for death or grievous bodily injury is reportable if the suit involves three or more separate incidents of injury. The reporting obligation arises when at least three plaintiffs have settled their claims or when a combination of settled claims and adjudications favorable to plaintiffs reaches three. Multiple lawsuits arising from one incident involving the same product only count as one lawsuit for the purposes of section 37.
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods indicated.
  Dated: May 12, 2009
    /s/ BRET W. JOHNSENBret W. JohnsenSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer 9
EXHIBIT 32.1

                      CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE 1st BANCORP
  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 REGARDING QUARTERLY
            REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2005


         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of Service 1st Bancorp, a California corporation
("Bancorp"), does hereby certify that:

1.       Bancorp's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June
         30, 2005 (the "Form 10-QSB") fully complies with the requirements of
         Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
         amended; and

2.       Information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Bancorp.


Date: August 12, 2005                  By: /s/ JOHN O. BROOKS
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           John O. Brooks
                                           Chief Executive Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)


Date: August 12, 2005                  By: /s/ ROBERT E. BLOCH
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Robert E. Bloch
                                           Executive Vice President and
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                           (Principal Financial and
                                           Accounting Officer)


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Service 1st Bancorp and will be retained by Service 1st Bancorp
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

                                       28
NRC TO DISCUSS IMPLEMENTING ORDERS FOR

POST-FUKUSHIMA IMPROVEMENTS JAN. 16 IN ROCKVILLE, MD

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with industry representatives Jan. 16 to 

continue discussions on schedules and guidance for actions stemming from recommendations of 

the NRC’s Japan Near-Term Task Force, which examined issues raised by the Fukushima 

nuclear accident in March 2011. 

The meeting will be held from 9-11:30 a.m. in the Commission Hearing Room on the 

first floor of the White Flint North complex at 11555 Rockville Pike in Rockville, Md. 

NRC management and industry executives will discuss topics including:

U.S. nuclear power plants’ integrated plans for complying with three specific 

post-Fukushima actions the NRC ordered the plants to take in March 2012;

Efforts to better understand and analyze flooding and earthquake hazards;

Strategies to respond to extreme natural events resulting in the loss of power at 

plants, and;

Longer-term activities to resolve other recommendations.

The public will have the opportunity to ask the NRC staff questions about the process 

during the meeting, which will be webcast. The meeting will include a teleconference; those 

planning to attend the meeting or call in to the teleconference should contact Richard Jervey at 

301-415-1073 or richard.jervey@nrc.gov to ensure adequate meeting resources are available. 

The NRC continues to evaluate and act on the lessons learned from Fukushima to ensure 

U.S. nuclear power plants implement appropriate safety enhancements. Following direction from 

the agency’s five Commissioners, the NRC’s activities are being led by a steering committee 

comprised of senior NRC management. The agency has also established the Japan LessonsLearned Project Directorate, a group of more than 20 full-time employees focused exclusively on 

implementing the task force’s recommendations and related activities.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 13-001 January 9, 2013