alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fw: clean RIA chapters for OMB, keeping emails smaller than 5MB 

 12/16/2011 08:00 PM 

From: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US 

 

To: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

----- Forwarded by RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US on 12/16/2011 08:00 PM 

----- 

From: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US 

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov 

Date: 12/16/2011 07:56 PM 

Subject: Fw: clean RIA chapters for OMB, keeping emails smaller than 

5MB 

----- Forwarded by RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US on 12/16/2011 07:56 PM 

----- 

From: Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US 

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Amy Lamson <lamson.amy@epa.gov>, 

Amanda 

CurryBrown/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Alex 

Barron/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Al McGartland/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, DavidA 

Evans/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Jim DeMocker/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 12/16/2011 07:55 PM 

Subject: clean RIA chapters for OMB, keeping emails smaller than 5MB 

Ron Evans 

Leader, Air Economics Group 

HEID/OAQPS/OAR/EPA 

Mail Drop C-439-02 

919-541-5488 

919-541-0839 fax 

0_Executive SummaryMATS_1216_FINAL.doc 

Chapter 2_ElectricPowerSectorProfile_1216_FINAL.doc 

Chapter 1_IntroductionBackground_1216_FINAL.doc
### §10157. Transportation

(a)(1) 1 Transportation of spent nuclear fuel under section 10156(a) of this title shall be subject to licensing and regulation by the Commission and by the Secretary of Transportation as provided for transportation of commercial spent nuclear fuel under existing law.

(2) The Secretary, in providing for the transportation of spent nuclear fuel under this chapter, shall utilize by contract private industry to the fullest extent possible in each aspect of such transportation. The Secretary shall use direct Federal services for such transportation only upon a determination of the Secretary of Transportation, in consultation with the Secretary, that private industry is unable or unwilling to provide such transportation services at reasonable cost.

(Pub. L. 97–425, title I, §137, Jan. 7, 1983, 96 Stat. 2241.)

1 So in original. No subsec. (b) has been enacted.
### SUBCHAPTER II—ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM PREVENTION, TREATMENT, AND REHABILITATION PROGRAMS FOR GOVERNMENT AND OTHER EMPLOYEES
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY 

AND POLLUTION PREVENTION 

December 29, 2015 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: 

FROM: 

TO: 

Introduction 

Minutes of the Gamma-cyhalothrin Registration Review Meetings with 

Cheminova/ FMC 

Wilhelmena Livingston, Chemical Review Manage A~ J.. ~~Jc-- Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division f1 1. 

Office ofPesticide Programs 

OPP Public Docket for Gamma-cyhalothrin 

Docket # EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0479 

This document reflects the minutes from the meetings that EPA held with 

Cheminova/FMC during the registration review public process for gamma-cyhalothrin. 

Date of Meetings 

June 24, 2015 

The Agency met with the technical registrant, Cheminova/ FMC, for gamma-cyhalothrin to 

discuss EPA/ ORD's proposal to conduct an acute comparative motor activity study on gammacyhalothrin and lambda-cyhalothrin. ORD is willing to conduct this study; however, they requested 

that the registrants for these active ingredients provided the test material for the study. The motor 

activity data are needed to compare gamma-cyhalothrin to lambda-cyhalothrin, and for determining 

a relative potency factor for the cumulative risk assessment for the pyrethroids. 

Conclusion 

EPA will have a follow-up conference call with Cheminova/ FMC to discuss some remaining 

questwns. 
Attendees: 

EPA 

Ginger Moser 

Christopher Schlosser 

Cathryn Britton 

Wilhelmena Livingston 

Registrant (Cheminova/FMC) 

Paul Whatling 

Terri Spanogle 

Zhiwei Liu 

Derek Gammon 

July 21. 2015 

The Agency held a follow-up conference call with the technical registrant for gammacyhalothrin, Cheminova/ FMC, to clarify some key points from the previous meeting that was held 

on June 24, and to discuss some remaining questions. 

The following topics were discussed: 

Conclusion 

EPA's clarification concerning the regulatory justification/ need for the 

comparative motor activity study 

EPA's clarification concerning the goal(s) and design of the study 

Discussion of BMD analysis of data on lambda-cyhalothrin 

Preservation of blood and brain samples from the study 

Cheminova/ FMC visit to ORD's laboratory 

Sharing of study data 

The comparative motor activity study for gamma-cyhalothrin would follow the study design 

of Wolansky (2006) in keeping with a uniform measure of toxicity for the pyrethroids. At the close 

of the conference call, Cheminova/ FMC requested a copy of the data evaluation record (DER) of 

the Wolansky study. EPA will provide Cheminova/ FMC with a copy of the fmal DER of that study. 

EPA/ ORD anticipate conducting the study in early August 2015. Cherninova/ FMC will 

provide the EPA/ ORD with the logistics for preserving the blood and brain samples from the 

study. 

Attendees: 

EPA 

Ginger Moser 
Katherine McDaniel 

Donna Davis 

Christopher Schlosser 

Cathryn Britton 

Wilhelmena Livingston 

Registrant (Cheminova/FMC) 

PaulWhatling 

Terri Spanogle 

Zhiwei Liu 

Derek Gammon
EXHIBIT 32.1 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In
connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period
ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) by Gold Horse International, Inc. (the Registrant), I, Liankuan
Yang, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that: 1.
The Report
  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.
The
  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of Registrant.  /s/ Liankuan
  YangName:
  Liankuan YangTitle: Chief
  Executive Officer, principal executive officer Dated: October
19, 2009 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Josephine C. McGoey, as Administratrix of the Estate of Peter J. McGoey, Deceased, Respondent, v. City of New York, Appellant.

*637Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Callahan, J., dissents insofar as the complaint is dismissed and votes to order a new trial.
### SUBCHAPTER XXVIII—HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND QUALITY
No: II-14-052 September 29, 2014

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416

NRC Assigns New Resident Inspector to Watts Bar Nuclear Plant

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Atlanta have selected Jeff Hamman to serve as the 

new resident inspector at the Watts Bar nuclear plant’s Unit 1. 

The Watts Bar plant is operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority and is located near Spring 

City, Tenn., about 60 miles southwest of Knoxville. The plant’s Unit 1 has been in operation since 

1996 and TVA is currently completing construction and testing of Unit 2. The NRC is expected to 

make a decision on a license for Unit 2 in 2015. 

Hamman joins Senior Resident Inspector Jared Nadel, who 

recently assumed that role for Unit 1. The NRC also has resident 

inspectors for the Unit 2 construction activities.

Before being assigned to the Watts Bar site, Hamman had 

served since April 2007 as a project engineer in the NRC’s Region II 

office in Atlanta. Before joining the NRC, Hamman worked as a 

licensing specialist at the Summer Nuclear Station near Jenkinsville, 

S.C., and as an engineer at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Savannah 

River Site. Hamman also served six years on active duty in the U.S. Navy as a Reactor Operator, and 

currently serves in the U.S. Navy Civil Engineer Corps as a reserve officer, holding the rank of 

Commander. He has more than 30 years military service, both active and reserve, and is a veteran of 

Operation Iraqi Freedom.

Hamman received a bachelor of science degree in engineering from the University of South 

Carolina in Columbia. He is also a licensed professional engineer in South Carolina.

“Jeff Hamman has the commitment and experience to carry out the NRC mission of protecting 

people and the environment by helping ensure the safety of the Watts Bar plant,” said NRC Region II 

Administrator Victor McCree.

At least two NRC resident inspectors are assigned to each operating U.S. commercial nuclear 

plant. They serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major 

work projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. Resident inspectors can serve at one 

site for up to seven years. 

The Watts Bar resident inspectors can be reached at 423-365-5487.
Page | 2
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ProUroCareMedical Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Richard C. Carlson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

(1)           the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

/s/ Richard C.Carlson

Richard C. Carlson

Chief ExecutiveOfficer

May 15, 2007

----
<PAGE>
                                                                   Page 11 of 20

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(d)

                        KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 1999-B

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

Bank One, National Association             Banker's Trust Company, Deutsche Bank
One Bank One Plaza, Suite 0126             100 Plaza One, Mailstop: JCY03-6450
Chicago, IL  60670                         Jersey City, NJ 07310
Attn: Corporate Trust Administration       Attn: Corporate Trust & Agency Group
Phone: (312) 407-0192                            Structured Finance
Fax: (312) 407-1708                        Phone: (201) 593-6776
                                           Fax: (201) 593-6459

Key Bank USA, National Association
800 Superior Ave, 4th Floor
Cleveland, OH 44114
ATTN: Senior Vice President
Key Education Resources
Phone: (216) 828-9342
Fax: (216) 828-9301

Pursuant to Section 4.09 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement among Key Bank USA,
National Association, as Seller, Master Servicer and Administrator, KeyCorp
Student Loan Trust 1999-B, and Bank One, National Association as Eligible Lender
Trustee, dated as of September 1, 1999 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned hereby
certifies that (i) a review of the activities of the Administrator from January
1, 2001, through December 31, 2001, and of its performance under the Agreement
has been made, and (ii) to the best of our knowledge, based on our review, the
Administrator has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement and the
related Administration Agreement respectively throughout such period.



                                         Key Bank USA, National Association,
                                         as Administrator


                                         by:  /S/ DARLENE H. DIMITRIJEVS
                                             -----------------------------------
Date: March 4, 2002                      Name: Darlene H. Dimitrijevs, CPA
                                         Title: Senior Vice President



                                         by: /S/ DEBRA S. FRONIUS
                                             -----------------------------------
                                         Name: Debra S. Fronius
                                         Title: Vice President
### §11272. Dissemination

The Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services shall disseminate the results of research conducted under this part to appropriate professional entities and to the public.

(Pub. L. 99–660, title IX, §938, formerly §949B, Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3812; renumbered §938, Pub. L. 100–607, title I, §142(c)(2)(B), Nov. 4, 1988, 102 Stat. 3057; amended Pub. L. 108–173, title IX, §900(e)(5)(C), Dec. 8, 2003, 117 Stat. 2373.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2003—Pub. L. 108–173 substituted "Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services" for "Health Care Financing Administration".
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

GENERAL ELECTRIC COM PANY, Appellant

v.

VIBRANT MEDIA, INC., Appellee

______________________

2015

- 1015

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2013

- 00170.

-------------------------------

GENERAL ELECTRIC COM PANY, Appellant

v.

VIBRANT MEDIA, INC., Appellee

______________________

2015

- 1136

______________________Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2013

- 0017 2.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

M ICHAEL C ASEY , Davidson Berquist Jackson & Gowdey, LLP, McLean, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by J OHN S COTT D AVIDSON , Arlington, VA.

M ATTHEW B. L OWRIE , Foley & Lardner LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellee. Also represented by K EVIN M.

L ITTMA N

, C HRISTOPHER J. M C K ENNA

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (P ROST

, Chief Judge, D YK and C HEN

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

December 17, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

Date Daniel E. O’Toole

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.1    Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Western Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc. (the "Company") for the six months ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven P. Grimes Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company and James W. Kleifges as Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge: (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Steven P. GrimesName:Steven P. GrimesChief Executive Officer, President 
Chief Financial Officer and TreasurerDate:August 11, 2010/s/ James W. KleifgesName:James W. KleifgesChief Accounting OfficerDate:August 11, 2010
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.  No. 01-4997

JOHN SCHWENGER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg.

W. Craig Broadwater, District Judge.

(CR-01-6)

Submitted: April 18, 2002

Decided: April 29, 2002

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

COUNSEL

John Schwenger, Appellant Pro Se. Sherry L. Muncy, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Clarksburg, West Virginia,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c). 
OPINION

PER CURIAM: 

John Schwenger appeals the district court’s order denying his

appeal and affirming the magistrate judge’s order adjudicating him

guilty of offenses arising from events at Harpers Ferry National Historical Park. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

order and the transcript of the proceedings and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm. 

Schwenger appeals the district court’s decision not to disturb the

magistrate judge’s ruling denying his motion to suppress evidence.

Rule 12(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure requires

that motions to suppress evidence must be made before trial. United

States v. Wilson, 115 F.3d 1185, 1190 (4th Cir. 1997). Failure to make

a motion to suppress before trial constitutes waiver. We find that Schwenger waived the issue of whether evidence should be suppressed.

Because the only issue Schwenger raised before the district court

was regarding the suppression of evidence, we do not review the other

issues raised in his informal brief. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process. 

AFFIRMED

2 UNITED STATES v. SCHWENGER
No: 14-040 July 3, 2014

CONTACT: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200 

NRC Publishes Annual Report to Congress on Nuclear Security Inspections

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has made available to the public an unclassified version of 

its annual report to Congress detailing the previous year’s security inspection program. The report is 

required under the Energy Policy Act of 2005.

The report covers the NRC’s security inspection program, including force-on-force (combat 

simulation) exercises, for commercial nuclear power reactors and Category I fuel cycle facilities for 

calendar year 2013.

“This report describes the NRC’s efforts to oversee the protection of the nation’s civilian 

nuclear power infrastructure,” NRC Chairman Allison M. Macfarlane said. “The NRC is committed to 

ensuring that licensees maintain a robust and rigorous security posture to protect the facilities we 

regulate and the materials managed within them.”

In 2013, the NRC added two new inspections to its security inspection program. The NRC 

began inspections of licensees’ cyber security plans and licensees’ preparations to respond to a 

potential aircraft threat. Overall, the NRC conducted 289 security inspections, including 23 force-onforce inspections, during 2013. The security program and publicly available results of the inspections 

are discussed in the report. 

Whenever a finding is identified during a security inspection, the NRC ensures the issue is 

corrected immediately or compensatory measures are put in place, if necessary. Details of security

findings are considered sensitive and not released to the public.
#### Owen Murphy, Appellee, v. Gunning System, Appellant.

Gen. No. 21,325.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Clinton F. Irwin, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the June term, 1915.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed January 3, 1916.

Statement of the Case.

Action on the case for personal injury by Owen Murphy, plaintiff, against Cunning System, defendant. Plaintiff recovered against the defendant in the *370Superior Court a judgment on the verdict of a jury for $3,000, and defendant appeals.

Abstract of the Decision.

1. Appeal and error, § *1725*
      ***
      *—when refusal to eliminate count error.*In an action by an employee against an employer to recover for injuries received by falling from a framework, where on a former appeal the Appellate Court decided that plaintiff could not maintain an action for a defect in the footboard on which he was working, it is error to refuse to eliminate a count in the declaration charging as the sole act of negligence against defendant that it failed to maintain the footboard in a reasonably safe condition.

2. Appeal and error, § *1815*
      ***
      *-—when instructions misleading.*Instructions which permit the jury to predicate their verdict on a count of the complaint based on a theory of negligence which had been eliminated from the case on a former appeal are misleading.

This appeal is prosecuted from the second trial of the cause. On the first trial a verdict was instructed against plaintiff and the Appellate Court reversed the judgment entered on that verdict for the reason that in its opinion the facts found in the record should have been submitted to the jury for determination. The pleadings are the same as at the first trial. The syllabus on the former appeal appears in 184 Ill. App. 455.

David K. Tone, for appellant.,

Gorman, Pollock, Sullivan & Livingston, for appellee.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3468 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3468

              To prevent trafficking in counterfeit drugs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 17, 2011

    Mr. Meehan (for himself and Ms. Linda T. Sanchez of California) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
              To prevent trafficking in counterfeit drugs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Counterfeit Drug Penalty Enhancement 
Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. COUNTERFEIT DRUG PREVENTION.

    Section 2320(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3);
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following:
            ``(2) Counterfeit drugs.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Whoever commits an offense in 
                violation of paragraph (1) with respect to a drug (as 
                defined in section 201 of the Federal Food, Drug, and 
                Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321)) shall--
                            ``(i) if an individual, be fined not more 
                        than $4,000,000, imprisoned for life or for any 
                        term of years, or both; and
                            ``(ii) if a person other than an 
                        individual, be fined not more than $10,000,000.
                    ``(B) Multiple offenses.--In the case of an offense 
                by a person under this paragraph that occurs after that 
                person is convicted of another offense under this 
                paragraph, the person convicted--
                            ``(i) if an individual, shall be fined not 
                        more than $8,000,000, imprisoned for life or 
                        for any term of years, or both; and
                            ``(ii) if other than an individual, shall 
                        be fined not more than $20,000,000.''; and
            (3) in paragraph (3)(B), as redesignated, by striking 
        ``paragraph (1)'' and inserting ``paragraph (1) or (2)''.

SEC. 3. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

    Nothing in this Act, or the amendments made by this Act, shall be 
construed to apply to a drug (as defined in section 201 of the Federal 
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321)) solely because the drug 
is manufactured in or imported from a foreign country.
                                 <all>
```