alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### L. Brent Vaughan, Appellant, v. Alice R. Vaughan, Appellee. Alice R. Vaughan, Appellee, v. L. Brent Vaughan, Appellant.

Gen. No. 21,759.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Benjamin W. Pope, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the October term, 1915.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed January 31, 1916.

Rehearing denied February 14, 1916.

*Certiorari*denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

Statement of the Case.

Bill for divorce by L. Brent Vaughan, complainant, against Alice B. Vaughan, defendant, in the Circuit Court of Cook county, and cross-bill by defendant against complainant for separate maintenance. From a decree dismissing the bill for want of equity, and granting the prayer of the cross-bill, with an allowance of seventy-five dollars per month and one hundred and seventy-five dollars for solicitor’s fees, complainant appeals.

The parties were married October 11, 1899, and lived together as husband and wife until October, 1910, and thereafter continued to live in the same house until December 4, 1912.

Complainant was forced to leave his house by a foreclosure of the mortgage and rented two rooms with facilities for light housekeeping, and wanted his wife and their twelve-year-old daughter to occupy, such rooms, but did not himself live there, but went to the Lexington Hotel and later to the University Club. He did not invite his wife and daughter to come to him at either place.

Harris F. Williams, for appellant.

James J. Kelly, for appellee; John A. Burke and John T. Fitzgerald, of counsel.

*612Abstract of the Decision.

1. Divorce, § *53*—when motion to dismiss bill without prejudice properly refused.*It is not error to deny a motion of complainant in a bill for divorce to dismiss bis bill without prejudice where a cross-bill has been filed, section 36 of the Chancery Act (J. & A. If 916) providing that “no complainant shall be allowed to dismiss his bill after a cross-bill has been filed without the consent of the defendant.”

2. Appeal and error, § *725*—when record need not show findings of fact.*No findings of fact are required to support a decree where the evidence has been preserved by a certificate of evidence.

3. Husband and wife, § *217*—when decree on cross-bill in divorce action for separate support and maintenance and solicitor’s fees proper.*In a bill for divorce by a husband where defendant filed a cross-bill for separate maintenance, and the evidence warranted a finding that defendant was living separate and apart from her husband without her fault, defendant is entitled on her cross-bill to a decree for separate support and maintenance and solicitor’s fees.

Mr. Justice Baker

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### Florence E. Haynes, Appellant, v. Stephen B. Haynes, Respondent.

Ro opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. [Order denied motion to punish defendant for contempt.]
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

THOMAS GEORGE and JENIFER 

GEORGE,

Appellants,

v.

CYPRESS SPRINGS PROPERTY 

OWNERS ASSOCIATION,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-22-00069-CV

Appeal from the

207th Judicial District Court

of Comal County, Texas

(TC# C2018-1094B)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee 

recover from Appellant and its sureties, if any, see TEX. R. APP. P. 43.5, for performance of the 

judgment and all costs, both in this Court and the court below, for which let execution issue. This 

decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2023.

LISA J. SOTO, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Soto, J., Marion, C.J. (Ret.)

Marion, C.J. (Ret.) (sitting by assignment)
### Part A—Nuclear Energy Infrastructure
#### Donald Macaulay, Respondent, v. Louis De Jonge & Company, Inc., et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 10.31
 XO
COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
WAIVER
WITH RESPECT TO
AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AND GUARANTY AGREEMENT
  RECITALS
       WAIVER




---



##### 



[remainder of page intentionally left blank]




---



##### 



LENDER:
ARNOS CORP.By:
    Keith CozzaName:
    Keith CozzaTitle:
    Authorized SignatoryAgreed and Acknowledged:
XO COMMUNICATIONS, LLCBy:
    Gregory FreibergName:
    Gregory W. FreibergTitle:
    CFO




---



##### 



By:
    Gregory FreibergName:
    Gregory W. FreibergTitle:
    CFO
### SUBCHAPTER I—FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATORY COUNCIL
### SUBCHAPTER I—AIR POLLUTION PREVENTION AND CONTROL
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the annual report of Sierra Wireless, Inc. (the “Corporation”)on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Jason W. Cohenour, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

 

 

Datedat Richmond, BC, Canada this March 24, 2010.

 

 
| /s/ JASON W.  COHENOUR  |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Jason W.  Cohenour      |
| Chief Executive Officer |

 

----

 

**CERTIFICATEOF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

**PURSUANTTO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the annual report of Sierra Wireless, Inc. (the “Corporation”)on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, David G. McLennan, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

 

 

Datedat Richmond, BC, Canada this March 24, 2010.

 

 
| /s/ DAVID G.  MCLENNAN  |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| David G.  McLennan      |
| Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### § 285.4 Establishment of laboratory accreditation programs (LAPs) within NVLAP.

NVLAP establishes LAPs in response to legislative actions or to requests from private sector entities and government agencies. For legislatively mandated LAPs, NVLAP shall establish the LAP. For requests from private sector entities and government agencies, the Chief of NVLAP shall analyze each request, and, after consultation with interested parties through public workshops or other means to ensure open participation, shall establish the requested LAP, if the Chief of NVLAP determines there is need for the requested LAP.

[66 FR 29221, May 30, 2001, as amended at 76 FR 78815, Dec. 20, 2011]
Exhibit 31.1

SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION

I, Greg
Dougherty, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 29, 2013 of Oclaro, Inc.;
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: October 28, 2013 |  | /s/ Greg Dougherty     
|                        |  | Greg Dougherty         
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer
Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

National Business Ain'raft Association Eli Cotti 7/rl/?Jh -

Regional Airline Association Dave Lottert'r

i/h/O(' -

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman

7/ji!;/ch -

ATA Crilig Fabian 7/;ttftl -
January 10, 2006


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 - Fifth Street - N.W.
Washington, DC  20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

This letter authorizes the following representatives of The Clorox Company,
acting singly, to execute and file with you on my behalf future Forms 3,
4 and 5 respecting my holdings of equity securities of The Clorox Company:

Laura Stein, Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary
Angela Hilt, Senior Corporate Counsel
Cheryl Brice, Assistant Secretary

Sincerely,


/s/ Gary G. Michael
Name:  Gary G. Michael
Title:  Director
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Charles Brancato, Respondent, against John W. Cowper Co. et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. *753Claimant’s regular work was common labor. Before March 27, 1950, he was suffering from hypertension, high blood pressure and cerebral arteriosclerosis. On March 27th he was working as a pick and shovel laborer digging a trench. The ground was hard; the work was arduous; but it was his usual work. While doing this he suffered a cerebral hemorrhage. There is medical opinion that with claimant’s physical background the work he was doing was a contributing cause to the hemorrhage. Where there is such a background of physical weakness even the ordinary work which helps to cause disaster can bring about an “ accident ” in the sense in which the word is used in the statute. *(Matter of Kayser*v. *Erie Go. Sighway Dept.,*276 App. Div. 789.) Decision and award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Imrie, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Worldwide Manufacturing
USA, Inc., formerly Tabatha III, Inc.,(the "Company") on Form
10-KSB/A  for the period ending June 30, 2003, (the  "Report"),
I, Robert L. Smith, President and Director certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a)
or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the Company's financial position and
results of operations.



/s/ Robert L. Smith
-----------------------
Robert L. Smith
President and Director


Date: February 10, 2004
# Официален вестник C 366A/30 о

| | ISSN 1977-0855 |
| --- | --- |
| Официален вестник
  на Европейския съюз | C 366A |
| | |
| Издание на български език | Информация и известия | Година 6330 октомври 2020 г. |

ISSN 1977-0855

Официален вестник

на Европейския съюз

C 366A

Издание на български език

Информация и известия

Година 6330 октомври 2020 г.

---

| Съдържание | Страница |
| --- | --- |
| | Поправки |
| 2020/C 366 A/01 | Поправка на Обявление за свободна длъжност CONS/AD/162/20 ( ОВ C 358 A, 26.10.2020 г. ) | 1 |

Съдържание

Страница

Поправки

2020/C 366 A/01

Поправка на Обявление за свободна длъжност CONS/AD/162/20 ( ОВ C 358 A, 26.10.2020 г. )

( ОВ C 358 A, 26.10.2020 г. )

1

---

| BG | |
| --- | --- |

BG

---

Поправки

| 30.10.2020 | BG | Официален вестник на Европейския съюз | CA 366/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2020

BG

Официален вестник на Европейския съюз

CA 366/1

---

Поправка на Обявление за свободна длъжност CONS/AD/162/20

(
  Официален вестник на Европейския съюз C 358 A от 26 октомври 2020 г.
  )

(2020/C 366 A/01)

На страница 1, в частта „ОБЩА ИНФОРМАЦИЯ“, полето „Служба“:

| вместо: | „Генерална дирекция „Външни работи, разширяване и гражданска защита“, |
| --- | --- |

вместо:

„Генерална дирекция „Външни работи, разширяване и гражданска защита“,

| да се чете: | „Генерална дирекция „Външни отношения“. |
| --- | --- |

да се чете:

да се чете

„Генерална дирекция „Външни отношения“.

На страница 1, в частта „Ние сме“, вторият параграф:

| вместо: | „Генерална дирекция „Външни работи, разширяване и гражданска защита“ (ГД RELEX) понастоящем се състои от 2 дирекции: RELEX.1, която се занимава с търговията, развитието, сигурността и координацията, и RELEX.2, която се занимава с разширяването, Близкия изток и Северна Африка и гражданската защита.“, |
| --- | --- |

вместо:

вместо

„Генерална дирекция „Външни работи, разширяване и гражданска защита“ (ГД RELEX) понастоящем се състои от 2 дирекции: RELEX.1, която се занимава с търговията, развитието, сигурността и координацията, и RELEX.2, която се занимава с разширяването, Близкия изток и Северна Африка и гражданската защита.“,

| да се чете: | „Генерална дирекция „Външни отношения“ (ГД RELEX) понастоящем се състои от 2 дирекции: RELEX.1, която се занимава с търговията, развитието и сигурността, и RELEX.2, която се занимава с политиката за съседство и реакцията при кризи.“. |
| --- | --- |

да се чете:

да се чете

„Генерална дирекция „Външни отношения“ (ГД RELEX) понастоящем се състои от 2 дирекции: RELEX.1, която се занимава с търговията, развитието и сигурността, и RELEX.2, която се занимава с политиката за съседство и реакцията при кризи.“.

---
#### William Kontos, Plaintiff in Error, v. William Clemens et al., Defendants in Error.

Gen. No. 21,197.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Abstract of the Decision.

Municipal Court of Chicago, § *31*
      ***
      *—when judgment affirmed on appeal.*On writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Municipal Court of Chicago in a fourth-class contract action, where a stenographic report containing all the errors assigned has been stricken because not seasonably filed, there is nothing to be passed on by the Appellate Court, and the judgment will be affirmed.

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Joseph P. Rafferty, Judge, presiding.

Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1915.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed January 27, 1916.

Statement of the Case.

Action by William Kontos, plaintiff, against William Clemens, Robert McLaughlin, Mathew Kersting, Charles F. Healy and others, defendants, in the Municipal Court of Chicago, to recover on a contract. The action was of the fourth class. The court found in favor of all the defendants except Robert McLaughlin. To reverse a judgment for such defendants, plaintiff prosecutes this writ of error.

Beauregard F. Moseley, for plaintiff in error.

Winston, Payne, Strawn & Shaw, for defendants in error, Kersting and Healy.

Charles V. Barrett, for defendant in error, William Clemens.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### § 511.610 Notification.

The Office shall notify the employee, or a representative if one is designated, and the agency in writing of its decision.
### §9104. Authorization of appropriations

Necessary amounts may be appropriated to carry out this chapter.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1232.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 9104 | 40:106. | May 17, 1910, ch. 243, §2, 36 Stat. 371; May 25, 1955, ch. 76, 69 Stat. 66; May 13, 1960, Pub. L. 86–461, 74 Stat. 128. |

Section
### §10172. Selection of Yucca Mountain site

#### (a) In general

(1) The Secretary shall provide for an orderly phase-out of site specific activities at all candidate sites other than the Yucca Mountain site.

(2) The Secretary shall terminate all site specific activities (other than reclamation activities) at all candidate sites, other than the Yucca Mountain site, within 90 days after December 22, 1987.

#### (b) Eligibility to enter into benefits agreement

Effective on December 22, 1987, the State of Nevada shall be eligible to enter into a benefits agreement with the Secretary under section 10173 of this title.

(Pub. L. 97–425, title I, §160, as added Pub. L. 100–202, §101(d) [title III, §300], Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1329–104, 1329–121; Pub. L. 100–203, title V, §5011(a), Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–227.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 100–202 and Pub. L. 100–203 added identical sections.
June 10, 2015

Mr. Neil Savage
Towersource, Inc.

1875 Old Alabama Road Roswell, GA 30076

Dear Mr. Savage:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your May 18, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015- 1607), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods indicated.
  Dated: May 11, 2010
    
    /s/ RAOUF Y. HALIMRaouf Y. HalimChief Executive Officer
§ 930.38 Consistency determinations for activities initiated prior to management program approval. ( a ) A consistency determination is required for ongoing Federal agency activities other than development projects initiated prior to management program approval, which are governed by statutory authority under which the Federal agency retains discretion to reassess and modify the activity. In these cases the consistency determination must be made by the Federal agency at the earliest practicable time following management program approval, and the State agency must be provided with a consistency determination no later than 120 days after management program approval for ongoing activities which the State agency lists or identifies through monitoring as subject to consistency with the management program.
( b ) A consistency determination is required for major, phased federal development project decisions described in § 930.36(d) which are made following management program approval and are related to development projects initiated prior to program approval. In making these new decisions, Federal agencies shall consider effects on any coastal use or resource not fully evaluated at the outset of the project. This provision shall not apply to phased federal decisions which were specifically described, considered and approved prior to management program approval (e.g., in a final environmental impact statement issued pursuant to NEPA).
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3518 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3518

 To impose a regulatory moratorium and prevent taxes from being raised 
                              for 2 years.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 29, 2011

    Mr. Rogers of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was 
  referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the 
Committees on Oversight and Government Reform and the Judiciary, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To impose a regulatory moratorium and prevent taxes from being raised 
                              for 2 years.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IN GENERAL.

    During the period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act 
and terminating on the date that is 2 years after that date, no agency 
may make any rule that would affect employment levels, and the Congress 
shall not enact any law resulting in an increase in the tax liability 
of any person or entity.
                                 <all>
```