alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1211.30 Effective date.

The recordkeeping requirements in this subpart shall become effective on January 21, 1993, and shall apply to automatic residential garage door operators manufactured on or after that date.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 227 (Friday, November 26, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 68930]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26126]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than December 20, 2004.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. Nicholas, 
Community Affairs Officer) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. Maximum Holding International, Inc., Brooklyn Park, Minnesota; 
to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting 
shares of First Security Bank-Sanborn, Sanborn, Minnesota.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 19, 
2004.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 04-26126 Filed 11-24-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Exihibit 31.1


                       CERTIFICATIONS


I, Robert L. Smith and John Ballard certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of
Tabatha III, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this annual report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for
the registrant and have:

   a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
is being prepared;

   b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

   c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

   a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

   b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

6. I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date:November 10, 2003
                                                       /s/ ROBERT L. SMITH
                                                           Robert L. Smith
                                                   Chief Executive Officer

			     /s/ JOHN BALLARD
			         John Ballard
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
### §11372a. Amount and allocation of assistance

#### (a) In general

Of the amount made available to carry out this part and part C for a fiscal year, the Secretary shall allocate nationally 20 percent of such amount for activities described in section 11374 of this title. The Secretary shall be required to certify that such allocation will not adversely affect the renewal of existing projects under this part and part C for those individuals or families who are homeless.

#### (b) Allocation

An entity that receives a grant under section 11372 of this title, and serves an area that includes 1 or more geographic areas (or portions of such areas) served by collaborative applicants that submit applications under part C, shall allocate the funds made available through the grant to carry out activities described in section 11374 of this title, in consultation with the collaborative applicants.

(Pub. L. 100–77, title IV, §413, as added Pub. L. 111–22, div. B, title II, §1201(4), May 20, 2009, 123 Stat. 1678.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 413 of Pub. L. 100–77 was renumbered section 414 and is classified to section 11373 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the earlier of 18 months after May 20, 2009, or 3 months after publication of certain final regulations by Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, see section 1503 of Pub. L. 111–22, set out as an Effective Date of 2009 Amendment note under section 11302 of this title.
### §4308. Penalties for submission of cost known to be unallowable

The submission to an executive agency of a proposal for settlement of costs for any period after those costs have been accrued that includes a cost that is expressly specified by statute or regulation as being unallowable, with the knowledge that the cost is unallowable, is subject to section 287 of title 18 and section 3729 of title 31.

(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3788.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 4308 | 41:256(i). | June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title III, §306(i), as added Pub. L. 100–700, §8(a)(1), Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4634; Pub. L. 103–355, title II, §2151, Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3313. |

Section
### §10307. Types of research and development

The type of research and development to be undertaken under the authority of sections 10304 and 10305 of this title and to be encouraged by the institutes established under section 10303 of this title shall include the following:

(1) Aspects of the hydrologic cycle;

(2) Supply and demand for water;

(3) Demineralization of saline and other impaired waters;

(4) Conservation and best use of available supplies of water and methods of increasing such supplies;

(5) Water reuse;

(6) Depletion, contamination, and degradation of groundwater supplies;

(7) Improvements in the productivity of water when used for agricultural, municipal, and commercial purposes;

(8) The economic, legal, engineering, social, recreational, biological, geographic, ecological, and other aspects of water quality and quantity problems;

(9) Scientific information dissemination activities, including identifying, assembling, and interpreting the results of scientific and engineering research on water resources problems; and

(10) Providing means for improved communication of research results, having due regard for the varying conditions and needs for the respective States and regions.

(Pub. L. 98–242, title I, §108, Mar. 22, 1984, 98 Stat. 101; Pub. L. 101–397, §1(k), (l), Sept. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 853.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1990—Par. (6). Pub. L. 101–397, §1(k), which directed that ", contamination," be inserted after "depletion", was executed by making the insertion after "Depletion" to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

Par. (8). Pub. L. 101–397, §1(l), inserted "quality and quantity" after "water".
This document is not available in Regulations.gov since it is a 

Physical Item. 

Contact the EPA Docket Center, Public Reading Room to view 

or receive a copy of this document. Requests for copies may be 

made as follows: 

In person/writing: 

Environmental Protection Agency, Docket Center 

1301 Constitution Ave NW, 2822T, Room 3334 

Washington, DC. 20004 

Telephone: 

202-566-1744 

Fax: 

202-566- 9744 

Email: 

docket-customerservice@epa.gov
#### In the Matter of Harry Krauss, Respondent. Joseph P. Vaccarella, as Mayor of the City of Mount Vernon, Appellant.

Appeal by the Mayor of the City of Mount Vernon from an order granting the motion of respondent, who is a member of the common council of said city, to vacate and quash a subpoena which had been issued by the appellant and served upon respondent, requiring the latter to appear as a witness in an investigation being conducted by the appellant' into the performance by a certain corporation of its contract with said city for the laying and relaying of flagwalks and sidewalks therein. Order reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and motion denied, without costs. Appellant had power to conduct the investigation and issue the subpoena, by virtue of section 66 of the charter of the City of Mount Vernon in that the section, in giving him investigative powers, also states that he may issue subpoenas to witnesses and administer oaths to them “in all eases relating to the affairs of the city and its officers and employees ”. The fact that the council of the city has similar investigative and subpoena power under section 50 of the said charter is not inimical to this holding. (Cf. *Matter of Herlands*v. *Surpless,*171 Mise. 914, affd. 258 App. Div. 275, affd. 282 N. Y. 647, and *Matter of Hertle [Ahearn],*120 App. Div. 717, affd. 190 N. Y. 531.) The said provision in section 66 has been a part of the said charter since its adoption in 1922 (L. 1922, eh. 490). However, its counterpart in section 50 was not added to the charter until 1935 (Local Laws, 1935, No. 3 of City of Mount Vernon). It appears, therefore, that the council did not have the power to examine into “public affairs of the city” between the times of the adoption of the charter and the 1935 amendment of section 50, and it would be unreasonable to hold that such power did not lie at least in the Mayor during that period of time, in view of the verbiage quoted above from section 66, despite contentions to the contrary based on the particular arrangement of the wording of the section. Since appellant had the stated power the court will not question his decision to exercise it, or his motive and good faith, and will not interfere with his action unless it appears that an infringement of rights or a legal wrong was threatened, or that it was inevitable or obvious that the examination would be futile so far as uncovering anything legitimate is concerned. *(Matter of Hirshfield*v. *Craig,*239 N. Y. 98; *Matter of Edge Ho Holding Corp.,*256 N. Y. 374; *Matter of Herlands*v. *Surpless, supra.)*The papers on file disclose no such situations. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur. [206 Misc. 848.]
#### American Stevedores, Inc., v. Louis J. Glickman et al.

Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 823.]
#### Edna Chandler, Respondent, v. Irving Kopf, Appellant.

Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. [See *post,*p. 733.]
#### Charles W. Young, Appellant, v. Ruth M. Young, Respondent.

Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Theodore Nevins, an Attorney, Respondent. Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Petitioner.

First Department,

December 7, 1954.

*George G. Hunter, Jr.,*of counsel *(Frank H. Gordon,*attorney), for petitioner.

*Emanuel Thebner*of counsel *(Abraham S. Robinson*and *Martin J. McLaughlin*with him on the brief; *Robinson é Thebner,*attorneys), for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Respondent commenced an action in Supreme Court, New York County, against a former client for $5,000, claiming the reasonable value of services he had rendered over a period of seven years. The client contended that respondent had been fully paid. Respondent later served a verified bill of particulars particularizing services claimed to have been rendered on 312 separate days. The Referee has found that certain discrepancies in the original bill of particulars were inadvertent *203and later corrected in an amended bill. We are in agreement with this finding. It is clear that the respondent was underpaid by his client and induced to render services for low remuneration on the basis of the glowing but unfulfilled promises made by the client. The evidence indicates that respondent accepted the fees paid as in full payment of all services rendered. His conduct in bringing an unfounded action against his client was improper and cannot be excused. However, since he appears to be a person who, as characterized by the Referee, was “ essentially honest and right thinking,” but “ blinded by disappointment over his rejection ” by his client, we believe that the ends of justice will be served by imposing no disciplinary action other than a censure. The respondent should be censured.

Peck, P. J., Cohn, Callahan, Breitel and Botein, JJ., concur.

Respondent censured.
Exhibit 99.1
Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, James N. Ryan, the Chief Executive Officer of Petroleum Development Corporation, the managing general partner of 2002-C Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"),  hereby certify that: 
- I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Partnership (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;
- the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

___/s/ James N. Ryan                                  

Name: James N. Ryan

Title: Chief Executive Officer

Date: ___May 14, 2003_____
### §11293. Education programs for safety and transportation personnel

The Director of the National Institute on Aging, through centers supported under section 285e–2 of this title, training academies, and continuing education programs, shall conduct education and information dissemination activities concerning Alzheimer's disease and related dementias for personnel involved in ensuring the public safety and providing public transportation. Such activities shall be designed to enhance the ability of such personnel to respond appropriately to individuals with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias whom such personnel may encounter in the course of their employment.

(Pub. L. 99–660, title IX, §963, Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3815.)
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 222 (Thursday, November 18, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 67508]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25558]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

39 CFR Part 501

Authorization to Manufacture and Distribute Postage Meters

AGENCY: Postal Service.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule provides contact information for submission of 
questions or comments and all notification, plans, and reports directed 
by regulation throughout 39 CFR Part 501--Authorization to Manufacture 
and Distribute Postage Meters.

DATES: This rule is effective November 18, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wayne Wilkerson, manager of Postage 
Technology Management, at 1735 N. Lynn Street, Rosslyn, VA 22209 by 
phone at (703) 292-3691 or by fax at (703) 292-4073.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title 39, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 
Part 501, Sections 501.1 through 501.30 provide Federal rules and 
regulations governing the manufacture and distribution of postage 
meters. These sections reference requirements that must be submitted to 
Postal ServiceTM or Postage Technology Management without 
identification of contact information for submission of requirements or 
inquiries. Section 501.1 gives the contact information for Postage 
Technology Management, the Postal Service office responsible for 
authorization.

List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 501

    Administrative practice and procedure, Postal Service.

The Amendment

0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Postal Service is amending 
39 CFR part 501 as follows:

PART 501--AUTHORIZATION TO MANUFACTURE AND DISTRIBUTE POSTAGE 
METERS

0
1. The authority citation for part 501 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 39 U.S.C. 101, 401, 403, 404, 410, 
2601, 2605; Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended (Pub. L. 95-
452, as amended), 5 U.S.C. App. 3.

0
2. Add Sec.  501.1(f) to read as follows:

Sec.  501.1  Postage evidencing system/infrastructure authorization.

* * * * *
    (f) The Postal Service functional area charged with administering 
authorization as described in this part 501 is the Postage Technology 
Management program office. All submissions cited throughout all 
sections of 39 CFR part 501 are to be made to this office in person or 
via U.S. mail to 1735 N. Lynn Street Room 5011, Rosslyn, VA 22209-6370 
or via fax to 703-292-4073. Inquiries may be made via telephone to 703-
292-3691, and information updates may be found on the U.S. Postal 
Service Web page at www.usps.com/postagesolutions/flash.htm.

Neva Watson,
Attorney, Legislative.
[FR Doc. 04-25558 Filed 11-17-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
July 30, 2015

Mr. David Shear

Eagle Digital Imaging, Inc.

435 NW 5th Street, Suite B

Corvallis, OR 97330

Dear Mr. Shear:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your May 14, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-1591), but 

we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply

with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, 

you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
§ 1.8 Nature, authority, and use of trade regulation rules. ( a ) For the purpose of carrying out the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act, the Commission is empowered to promulgate trade regulation rules, which define with specificity acts or practices that are unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce. Trade regulation rules may include requirements prescribed for the purpose of preventing such acts or practices. A violation of a rule constitutes an unfair or deceptive act or practice in violation of section 5(a)(1) of that Act (15 U.S.C. 45(a)(1)), unless the Commission otherwise expressly provides in its rule. The respondents in an adjudicative proceeding may show that the alleged conduct does not violate the rule or assert any other defense to which they are legally entitled.
( b ) The Commission at any time may conduct such investigations, make such studies, and hold such conferences as it may deem necessary. All or any part of any such investigation may be conducted under the provisions of part 2, subpart A of this chapter.
[86 FR 38547, July 22, 2021]
No: IV-14-012 June 18, 2014

CONTACT: Lara Uselding 817 200-1519

 Victor Dricks 817 200-1128

NRC Names New Senior Resident Inspector at

Fort Calhoun Station

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Arlington, 

Texas, have selected Max Schneider as the new senior resident 

inspector at the Fort Calhoun nuclear plant located north of 

Omaha, Neb. 

“Max Schneider’s technical and regulatory expertise, which 

includes extensive experience in the resident inspector program, will 

assist the NRC in carrying out its mission to protect people and the 

environment by ensuring the safe operation of Fort Calhoun Station,” 

said NRC Region IV Administrator Marc Dapas.

 Schneider joined the NRC in 1999 and has served as a Region IV Project Engineer, Resident 

Inspector at River Bend nuclear plant (Louisiana), and Senior Resident Inspector at Millstone

nuclear plant (Conn.). Since 2007, he’s been the senior resident inspector at the Pilgrim nuclear 

plant in (Massachusetts). Prior to joining the NRC, Schneider worked for the Department of Energy 

and the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard. He holds a bachelor’s in civil engineering from the University 

of Massachusetts Lowell.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant site has at least two NRC Resident Inspectors.

Schneider joins resident inspector Jacob Wingebach. They serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the 

facility, conducting inspections, monitoring significant work projects, and interacting with plant 

workers and the public. 

The Fort Calhoun Station resident inspectors can be reached at: 402-426-9611.