alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Internet Communications Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Rory O'Byrne, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 13th day of November, 2003.

| | /s/ Rory O'Byrne                                                         
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                          
| | Rory O'Byrne 
Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer
| |
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Frank Ivanoff, Appellant.

Judgments of conviction of the Court of Special Sessions affirmed. No opinion. Carr, Stapleton,Mills, Richand Putnam, JJ., concurred.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Colombia Goldfields Ltd. for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1)

the quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Colombia Goldfields Ltd. for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

the information contained in the quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2009, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Colombia Goldfields Ltd.

| | By:    | /s/
T. W. Lough                           
| | ------ | ------------------------------------------
| | Name:  | T. W. Lough                               
| | Title: | President and Principal Accounting Officer
| | Date:  | April 30 , 2009                           



---
### Part D—Research; Evaluation; Technical Assistance; Training
EXHIBIT 99.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Performance Capital
Management,  LLC  (the  "Company")  for the period ended March 31, 2002 as filed
with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I,  David  J. Caldwell, Chief Operations Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (section) 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that,  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


                                                    /s/ David J. Caldwell
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                  David J. Caldwell
                                                  Chief Operations Officer
                                                  April 24, 2003


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  be  deemed  filed by the Company for purposes of
Section  18  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended.


<PAGE>
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-10-0164 - Annual Review of the Need for Rulemaking or Regulatory Guidance on Extended Low-Level Radioactive Waste Storage

Accession Number: ML103500291

Date Released: Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML103090031 - SECY-10-0164 - Annual Review of the Need for Rulemaking or Regulatory Guidance on Extended Low-Level Radioactive Waste Storage (8 page(s), 12/23/2010)
    - ML103500302 - SECY-10-0164 - Enclosure 1 - Common Goals and Elements for All Licensees for Extended Low-Level Radioactive Waste Storage (2 page(s), 12/23/2010)
    - ML103500326 - SECY-10-0164 - Enclosure 2 - Examples of Existing Guidance Relevant to Extended Storage of Low-Level Radioactive Waste (1 page(s), 12/23/2010)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on October 20, 2004, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq*. (“the Act”), Siemens Westinghouse Power Corporation: Conformal Direct-Write Technology Enabled, Wireless, Smart Turbine Components has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade                           ( print page 69399)                        Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties to the venture are: Siemens Westinghouse Power Corporation, Orlando, FL and Mesoscribe Technologies, Inc., Stony Brook, NY. The nature and objectives of the venture are to demonstrate the viability of smart, self-aware engine components that will incorporate embedded, harsh-environment capable sensors for thermal, mechanical, and wear sensing, integrated with wireless technology for signal transmission under the Advanced Technology Program of NIST. The activities of the joint venture will be partially funded by an award from the Advanced Technology Program, National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-26223 Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### Mildred Shotack, Respondent, v. Walter Shotack, Appellant.

Order unanimously modified by reducing alimony to $35 per week and counsel fee to $200 and, as so modified affirmed. The amount now fixed is adequate. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Breitel, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2


Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer


of CNA Financial Corporation


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350


(As adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of CNA Financial Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:


|  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|• | the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedJune 30, 2018filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|  |                                                                                                                                                     
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|• | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:July 30, 2018By/s/ D. Craig MenseD. Craig MenseChief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
### subpart 6—savings provisions
#### In the Matter of Robert I. Lennox, Judgment-Creditor-Respondent, against Robert W. Brady et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Brady & Daly, Judgment Debtors, and Robert R. Daly, Judgment-Debtor-Appellant. Zarkin Machine Co. Inc., Third-Party Appellant.

The order of reference to the Official Referee is not appealable. *(Haubrich*v. *Haubrich,*267 App. Div. 872; *Carretta*v. *Evans,*254 App. Div. 773; *Matter of Greenwald [United Kitchen Equipment*Co.], 248 App. Div. 904; *Luttenberger*v. *Alpert Woodworking Corp.,*252 App. Div. 862.) The order appealed from is not in form to permit this court to pass upon the question of the power of Special Term to adopt the procedure followed, in the face of substantial dispute and real controversy as to the existence of any indebtedness from the third party to the judgment debtor. *(Kenney*v. *South Shore Natural Gas & Fuel Co.,*201 N. Y. 89, 92; *Drivas*v. *Lekas,*265 App. Div. 818; *Haubrich*v. *Haubrich, supra.)*In the event that hearings be had before the Official Referee, appellants may by proper objection before the Referee avoid consent and acquiescence in the adopted practice. *(Matter of Powley*v. *Dorland Bldg. Co.,*281 N. Y. 423.) Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
10.2


SIXTH AMENDMENT TO
EQUITY RESIDENTIAL 2002 SHARE INCENTIVE PLAN


THIS SIXTH AMENDMENT (the “Sixth Amendment”) to EQUITY
RESIDENTIAL 2002 SHARE INCENTIVE PLAN (“Plan”) is executed as of the 15th day
of March, 2007.


RECITALS


WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of Equity Residential
(the “Company”) adopted the Plan on February 21, 2002, which was approved by
the shareholders of the Company at the 2002 annual meeting.


WHEREAS, the Company entered into a First Amendment to
the Plan dated as of February 7, 2003, a Second Amendment to the Plan dated as
of June 10, 2003, a Third Amendment to the Plan dated as of April 25, 2005, a
Fourth Amendment to the Plan dated as of February 1, 2006 and a Fifth Amendment
to the Plan dated as of October 1, 2006.


WHEREAS, the Company desires to further amend the Plan
pursuant to this Sixth Amendment to change the retirement age for non-employee
Trustees from 70 to 72.


NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is further amended as follows:


1.             Share
Awards.   Section 5 (a) (iii) (C) is
hereby deleted in its entirety and the following section is substituted
therefor:


(C)           with respect to a
Grantee who is a member of the Board (excluding employee trustees) in
connection with his or her retirement at or after age 72, the Board’s decision
not to renominate him or her for re-election to the Board at any shareholders’
meeting at which Trustees are elected, or the failure to be re-elected to the
Board at any such shareholders’ meeting, or the Trustee’s resignation from the
Board by reason of either:  (i) a
material change in the Trustee’s employment or job responsibilities; or (ii)
the Trustee’s disability.


2.             Share
Options.    Section 6 (e) (iii) is
hereby deleted in its entirety and the following is substituted therefor:


(iii)          with respect to a
Grantee who is a member of the Board (excluding employee trustees) in
connection with his or her retirement at or after age 72,  the Board’s decision not to renominate him or
her for re-election to the Board at any shareholders’ meeting at which Trustees
are elected, or the failure to be re-elected to the Board at any such
shareholders’ meeting, or the Trustee’s resignation from the Board by reason of
either:  (i) a material change in the
Trustee’s employment or job responsibilities; or (ii) the Trustee’s disability,
in which case it shall be exercisable until its Expiration Date.


3.             Plan
In Full Force And Effect.   After
giving effect to this Sixth Amendment, the Plan remains in full force and
effect.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Sixth Amendment has been
executed as of the date first written above.


 


	
  

  	
  EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Bruce C. Strohm

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Bruce C. Strohm

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Executive Vice President and General Counsel
No: II-14-010 March 18, 2014

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416 

NRC Schedules Meetings to Discuss Agency’s Assessment

of Summer Nuclear Plant Unit 1 Operation and Units 2 and 3 Construction 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled an open house for March 27 to 

discuss the safety performance in 2013 of SCE&G’s Summer nuclear station, near Jenkinsville, S.C., 

about 26 miles northwest of Columbia. A separate meeting will follow to explain inspection and 

oversight for the two new units that are under construction at the same site. 

The open house will begin at 6 p.m. in the gymnasium at the McCrorey-Liston School of 

Technology, 1978 Monticello Rd. (State Highway 215 South), in Blair, S.C.

A letter sent from the NRC Region II office to plant officials addresses the performance of the 

operating unit during 2013 and will serve as the basis for the informal discussion.

The NRC found that the operating Summer unit met all NRC safety objectives in 2013. That 

performance means the plant will continue to receive the normal detailed NRC inspections this year.

“Our resident and region-based inspectors spend many hours monitoring plant activities to 

ensure that the plant operates safely,” said NRC Region II Administrator Victor McCree. “We hold 

these meetings every year to make our staff available to people who live close to the plant and answer 

questions about our oversight.”

Current performance information for the Summer plant is available on the NRC website.

At the second public meeting, which is scheduled to begin at 7 p.m., the NRC staff will discuss 

the agency’s assessment of the construction of the two new units in 2013. The NRC has two resident 

inspectors for the operating unit and three construction resident inspectors at the Summer site.

A letter sent from the NRC to plant officials addresses the oversight of the construction and will 

serve as the basis for the meeting presentation. The NRC staff found that the units were being 

constructed in a manner that protected public health and safety and met all regulatory objectives.

The NRC website has additional information on the NRC construction reactor oversight 

process.
§ 870.510 Continuation of eligibility for former Federal employees of the Civilian Marksmanship Program. ( a ) A Federal employee who was employed by the Department of Defense to support the Civilian Marksmanship Program as of the day before the date of the transfer of the Program to the Corporation for the Promotion of Rifle Practice and Firearms Safety, and was offered and accepted employment by the Corporation as part of the transition described in section 1612(d) of Public Law 104-106, 110 Stat. 517, is deemed to be an employee for purposes of this part during continuous employment with the Corporation unless the individual files an election under § 831.206(c) or § 842.109(c) of this title. Such a covered individual is treated as if he or she were a Federal employee for purposes of this part, and of any other part within this title relating to FEGLI. The individual is entitled to the benefits of, and is subject to all conditions under, FEGLI on the same basis as if the individual were an employee of the Federal Government.
( b ) Cessation of employment with the Corporation for any period terminates eligibility for coverage under FEGLI as an employee during any subsequent employment by the Corporation.
( c ) The Corporation must withhold from the pay of an individual described by paragraph (a) of this section an amount equal to the premiums withheld from the pay of a Federal employee for FEGLI coverage and, in accordance with procedures established by OPM, pay into the Employees' Life Insurance Fund the amounts deducted from the individual's pay.
( d ) The Corporation must, in accordance with procedures established by OPM, pay into the Employees' Life Insurance Fund amounts equal to any agency contributions required under FEGLI.
[74 FR 66566, Dec. 16, 2009]
#### Sol Kass et al., Respondents, v. Ralph Kaplan et al., Appellants.

Ho opinion. Holán, P. J., Carswell, Johnston and MaeCrate, JJ., concur; Sneed, J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment and to dismiss the complaint, upon the ground that the judgment improperly extends, by implication, a restrictive covenant to the fifteen-foot parcel which was never subject thereto. (See *Kitching*v. *Brown,*180 N. Y. 414, 427.)
§ 1031.13 Criteria for employee involvement. ( a ) Commission officials, other than those positions listed in § 1031.12(a), may be involved in the development of voluntary safety standards for consumer products, but only in their official capacity as employees of the Commission and if permitted to do so by their supervisor and any other person designated by agency management procedures. Such involvement shall be in accordance with Commission procedures.
( b ) Employees in positions listed in § 1031.12(a)(4), (5), and (6) may be involved, on a case-by-case basis, in the development of a voluntary standard provided that they have the specific advance approval of the Commission.
( c ) Except in extraordinary circumstances and when approved in advance by the Executive Director in accordance with the provisions of the Commission's meetings policy, 16 CFR part 1012, Commission personnel shall not become involved in meetings concerning the development of voluntary standards that are not open to the public for attendance and observation. Attendance of Commission personnel at a voluntary standard meeting shall be noted in the public calendar and meeting logs filed with the Office of the Secretary in accordance with the Commission's meetings policy.
( d ) Generally, Commission employees may become involved in the development of voluntary standards only if they are made available for comment by all interested parties prior to their use or adoption.
( e ) Involvement by Commission officials and employees in voluntary standards bodies or standards-developing groups does not, of itself, connote Commission agreement with, or endorsement of, decisions reached, approved or published by such bodies or groups.
### Part A—Conflict of Interest Provisions
Exhibit 4.1

               INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA


                                Simple Tech Inc.

                    TOTAL AUTHORIZED ISSUE 200,000,000 SHARES

                                                                 See Reverse for
                                                             Certain Definitions

  150,000,000 SHARES                                         50,000,000 SHARES
PAR VALUE $.0001 EACH                                      PAR VALUE $.0001 EACH
    COMMON STOCK                                               PREFERRED STOCK


This is to Certify that ______________________________________ is the owner of

________________________________________________________________________________
            FULLY PAID AND NONASSESABLE SHARES OF PREFERRED STOCK OF
                                Simple Tech Inc.

transferable  on the books of the  Corporation by the holder hereof in person or
by  duly  authorized  Attorney  upon  surrender  of  this  Certificate  properly
endorsed.  Witness,  the seal of the  Corporation and the signatures of its duly
authorized officers.

Dated


__________________________________            __________________________________
                         Secretary                                     President

<PAGE>
The following abbreviations when used in the inscription on the face of this
certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full
according to applicable laws or regulations:

TEN COM - as tenants in common                    UNIF GIFT MIN ACT....Custodian
TEN ENT - as tenants by the entireties                            (Cust) (Minor)
JT TEN -  as joint tenants with right
          of survivorship and not as                      Act____________
          tenants in common                                    (State)

         Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.

For value received, ______________________ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto


PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER
IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE


________________________________________________________________________________
 (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE)

________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________  shares
represented  by the  within  Certificate,  and do hereby irrevocably constitute
and appoint

_______________________________________________________________________ Attorney
to transfer  the said Shares on the books of the within  named Corporation  with
full power of substitution in the premises.


Dated: _____________________       ___________

In presence of

                                             ___________________________________


_____________________________________________
### subpart iii—grants for home visiting services for at-risk families