alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION EXHIBIT 31.1  I, Kevin R. Griffith, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of IDI Global, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  Date: April 16, 2007  /s/ Kevin R. Griffith  Kevin R. Griffith President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary/Treasurer
CHAIRMAN 

### G. Steven Burrill
VICE CHAIRMAN 

### Bill Lochte
TREASURER 

### Barry McLeane
SECRETARY 

### John McGraw
DIRECTORS 

### Emil Bakka Ed Bluthardt Mary Cole Laub Lori Collins Emerson Coy



## ·Bob, Egan )oe{aux 

## Dick{einimku{Je/,;;,; August 3, 2012 U. S. Department ofTransportation Office ofAviation Analysis Essential Air Service Division 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 

## Dcfr:.

# osr ..

# 1.JJ'1-

# orOC\ PO Box 1621 Eagle River, WI 54521 (866) 306-3690tollfree

(715) 337-0061 office www.vilascountyedc.org vilasedc@yahoo.com

Attn: Mr. Dennis J. DeVany, Chief Essential Air Service Division RE: Docket OST-2011-0109 Rhinelander, Wisconsin Dear Mr. DeVany, On behalfofthe Vilas County Economic Development Corporation, Iask you to favorably consider the proposal ofSkyWest Airlines to provide essential air transportation services to Rhinelander, WI. SkyWest Airlines has astrong history of providing reliable Essential Air Service so critical to regions like that ofnorthern Wisconsin and the U.P. of Michigan served by the Rhinelander/Oneida County Airport. VCEDC is a public/private partnership for economic development whose charge is to assist area businesses to compete and grow in today's market piace. Complete commercial air service is vital to the Vilas County economy; and job growth in our internationally competitive manufacturing,wholesaling and construction firms such as Pukalllumber, Ahlborn Equipment, Cornerstone Custom Builders, Kwaterski Bros Wood Products, AED Superstore and Oldenburg Group. All need reliable airservice to major airline hubs. Destination tourism in Vilas County is the largest local economic engine. Second home ownership in Vilas County makes up 60% ofthe housing market and over 80% ofthe county's assessed value. The region is the destination of thousands ofsecond homeowners from the Minneapolis and Chicago markets. SkyWest Airlines will provide those "weekend warriors" with an alternative

### P a e 

## I2

means oftransportation much shorterthan the five to seven hourauto commute. We strongly urge your support ofthe 

### SkyWest Airlines application to provide Essential Air Services to Rhinelander/Oneida County Airport. Respectfully,

G. Steven Burrill Chairman, Vilas County Economic Development Corporation

2
### Part C—Federal Work-Study Programs

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This part was originally enacted as part C of title I of the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964, Pub. L. 88–452, which Act comprises this chapter. It was redesignated as part C of title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, Pub. L. 89–329, by Pub. L. 90–575, title I, §131(a), Oct. 16, 1968, 82 Stat. 1028, and subsequently transferred to part C (§1087–51 et seq.) of subchapter IV of chapter 28 of Title 20, Education.
### §12116. Regulations

Not later than 1 year after July 26, 1990, the Commission shall issue regulations in an accessible format to carry out this subchapter in accordance with subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 5.

(Pub. L. 101–336, title I, §106, July 26, 1990, 104 Stat. 336.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 24 months after July 26, 1990, see section 108 of Pub. L. 101–336, set out as a note under section 12111 of this title.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# General Electric-Hitachi: Issuance of Global Laser Enrichment License.

Accession Number: ML12248A316

Date Released: Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML12212A182 - J. Oliver Letter re; Issuance of Global Laser Enrichment License. (3 page(s), 9/25/2012)
    - ML12249A043 - Enclosure: Global Laser Enrichment License. (8 page(s), 9/25/2012)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 2277** 

DR. SIMON BANKS, Doctor of Law Former Administr ative Law Judge t/a Judge Banks’ Group , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ALEXANDRIA; THE COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY, ALEXANDRIA; THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR , Defendants

- Appellees

.

**No. 17**  **- 1081** 

DR. SIMON BANKS, Doctor of Law Former Administrative Law Judge t/a Judge Banks’ Group,
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ALEXANDRIA; THE COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY, ALEXANDRIA; THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR,

Defendants

- Appellees.

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Liam O’Grady , District Judge. ( 1:16

- cv
- 01309

- LO

- TCB )

Submitted : March 13, 2017 Decided: March 2 2 , 20172 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DIAZ, Circuit Judge, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Simon Banks, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Dr. Simon Banks appeals the
district court ’ s order s denying his emergency motion for a writ

of mandamus , his motion for reconsideration , and his motions for
injunctive and declaratory relief

. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Banks v. Circuit Court of

Alexandria , No. 1:16

- cv
- 01309

- LO

- TCB (E.D. Va. Oct. 17, 2016;
Oct. 24, 2016 ; filed Dec. 20, 2016, entered December 21, 2016 ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 23, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 68147]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25954]



[[Page 68147]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than December 17, 2004.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Jay Bernstein, Bank 
Supervision Officer) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:
    1. The Toronto-Dominion Bank, Toronot, Ontario; to acquire 51 
percent of the voting shares of Banknorth Group, Inc., and thereby 
indirectly acquire voting shares of Banknorth, National Association, 
both of Portland, Maine. Comments on this application must be received 
by December 8, 2004.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Patrick Wilder, Assistant Vice 
President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Royal Financial, Inc., Chicago, Illinois; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Royal 
Savings Bank, Chicago, Illinois.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 18, 
2004.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 04-25954 Filed 11-22-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------

                  Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Shimon Alon, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
officer) of Precise Software Solutions, Ltd. (the "Registrant"), certify, to the
best of my knowledge, based upon a review of Amendment No. 1 to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 of the Registrant
(the "Report"), that:

     (1) The Report, as amended, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) The information contained and incorporated by reference in the Report,
as amended, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Registrant.


/s/ Shimon Alon
-------------------------
Name: Shimon Alon
Date: May 27, 2003
### SUBCHAPTER IV—SALES OF PROPERTY FOR PRIVATE USE
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A2198. DENNIS THOMAS v. CITY OF ATLANTA FIREFIGHTERS

PENSION FUND, et al.

In this direct appeal, Dennis Thomas seeks review of the superior court’s final

order affirming the decision of the City of Atlanta Firefighters Pension Fund and its

Board of Trustees to deny Thomas’ claim for additional pension benefits. Under

OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1), however, appeals from orders of superior courts reviewing

an administrative decision must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary

appeal. See Dunlap v. City of Atlanta, 272 Ga. 523, 524 (531 SE2d 702) (2000).

Thomas’failure to follow the required appellate procedure deprives us of jurisdiction

over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

January 30, 2020

01/30/2020
NRC HOLDING PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS PROPOSED

ENHANCEMENTS TO ITS FORCE-ON-FORCE INSPECTIONS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is holding a public meeting Thursday, July 12, to 

discuss proposed enhancements to the agency’s Force-on-Force Significance Determination 

Process, which is one way the NRC inspects the security programs at nuclear power plants 

through so-called “force-on-force” exercises.

Force-on-force inspections are part of the overall regime under which the NRC inspects 

safety and security protocols. In force-on-force inspections, a mock adversary force “attacks” a 

site, and the NRC assesses the plant’s ability to defend itself. These are conducted every three 

years. 

NRC staff members are currently reviewing options for enhancing these inspections, 

including enhancing the way some of the objectives are assessed. At this meeting, the staff will 

brief the public and stakeholders on status of the proposed changes, and seek input and questions 

from the audience. 

The meeting will be held from 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. at the NRC’s Two White Flint North 

building (with visitor entrance at the One White Flint North building) at 11545 Rockville Pike, 

Rockville, Md., Room T10A01. Participation is also available via a toll-free audio 

teleconference. The call-in number is 1-888-968-4312, passcode: 22859.

The full meeting notice is located here: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/publicmeetings/index.cfm?action=search.detail&MeetingCode=20120582 .

###

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand.

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 12-079 June 29, 2012
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2012

- 0732 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2012

- CE

- 022

- AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into a nd then out of the changed cell

. **Estimated Costs:** Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- hours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

c ost (@$8 5 /h our) Parts Cost Total Costs (labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### In corporating the new limitations (maintaining from 2009

- 14

- 13) 3.5 $ 297.50 $0 $ 297.50 

### 678 $ 201,705.00


### Inspection/preparati on wing spar (added limitation) 12.0 $ 1,020.0 0 

### 0 $ 1,020.00 

### 678 $ 691,560.00
$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 893,265 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $ 

### 0

**On**

**- Condition Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- hours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

### necessary

corrective actions based on revised limitations (from 2009

- 14

- 13) 6.0 $ 510.00 $4,000 $ 4,510.00



### re pair spar if needed 7.0 $ 595.00 $5,000 $ 5,595.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0. 00 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### : **Executive Order 1286 6:**  Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES * NO

* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES * NO

* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a subs tantial number of small entities? E xplain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in A laska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
No: II-13-046 July 2, 2013 

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

 Joey Ledford 404-997-4416 

NRC Schedules Public Meeting to Discuss Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant  

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a public meeting for July 11 near 

the Browns Ferry nuclear power plant to discuss the recently completed NRC supplemental inspections 

performed as a result of a red inspection finding at the Tennessee Valley Authority facility. 

 Also at the meeting, the staff will discuss the annual safety assessment of the plant, located 

near Athens, about 32 miles west of Huntsville. 

 The meeting is scheduled for Thursday, July 11, at 1 p.m. at the Calhoun Community 

College Aerospace Training Center, 6250 Highway 31 North in Tanner, Ala. 

 The meeting will begin with a discussion of the safety performance of the three Browns 

Ferry units during 2012. Due to the red inspection finding issued in May 2011, Browns Ferry continues 

to receive increased inspection and oversight. 

 The red finding is associated with the failure of a low-pressure coolant injection valve at the 

plant in the fall of 2010. That valve is part of a system that would be used for core cooling during 

certain accident scenarios, and its inoperable state could have led to core damage had a series of 

unlikely events occurred. Even though the valve was promptly repaired after its condition was 

discovered, under the NRC’s oversight process a red finding has high safety significance and results in 

intensive NRC inspection and oversight. 

 The increased oversight process will be discussed during the second portion of the meeting. 

A 23-person inspection team has spent more than 3,000 total hours reviewing a wide range of programs 

at the plant, including maintenance, operations, engineering, problem identification and resolution and 

safety culture as well as management oversight and decision making. 

 NRC inspectors and managers from the NRC’s Region II office in Atlanta will attend the 

meeting and will be available to answer questions from the public following the business portion of the 

meeting. 

 “Although the NRC continually monitors each nuclear plant, we believe it is important to 

hold annual meetings near each plant to discuss our oversight and answer any questions local residents 

may have,” said NRC Region II Administrator Victor McCree. “We also want to ensure people get all 

the information they need about key inspections such as the one just completed at Browns Ferry.” 
Page | 2 

 The annual performance letter for the Browns Ferry plant is available on the NRC website, as 

is performance information for Browns Ferry Unit 1, Unit 2 and Unit 3. 

 Members of the public who cannot attend the meeting but are interested in participating by 

telephone should contact the NRC’s Craig Kontz before the meeting at 404-997-4715 or 

Craig.kontz@nrc.gov.
No: 14-073 October 23, 2014

CONTACT: Maureen Conley, 301-415-8200 

NRC Renews License for Dry Spent Fuel Storage Facility at Calvert Cliffs

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved a 40-year license renewal for Exelon 

Generation’s dry-cask independent spent fuel storage installation at the Calvert Cliffs nuclear power 

plant in Lusby, Md.

The license now has an expiration date of Nov. 30, 2052. The initial 20-year license would have 

expired Nov. 30, 2012, but Exelon submitted a request to renew it in 2010. This meant the facility was 

considered to be in “timely renewal,” where the license would not expire as long as the NRC staff was 

reviewing the request. This allowed the Calvert Cliffs’ independent spent fuel storage installation to 

continue to operate under its existing license until the NRC completed its safety and security review 

and reached a decision on the license renewal application.

The renewed license, the fifth the NRC has issued for a dry cask storage facility, contains 

conditions requiring periodic inspections of the casks and their components to ensure potential aging 

effects are identified and managed. These conditions require Exelon to take corrective action to address 

findings that could prevent a cask component from performing its safety function.

“We are confident that Calvert Cliffs’ dry cask storage systems meet the NRC’s strict standards 

and will be able to store spent fuel safely over the extended period of the renewed license,” said Mark 

Lombard, Director of the NRC’s Division of Spent Fuel Management. “In addition, inspections by the 

licensee and the NRC will ensure that effects from aging will not affect the casks’ ability to protect the 

public and the environment.”

There are now 71 independent spent fuel storage facilities in the United States. Spent fuel is 

moved into NRC-approved dry casks after an appropriate time of cooling in a spent fuel pool. Plants 

implement dry storage when their spent fuel pools are at or near capacity.