alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 10.3**

 

MindspeedTechnologies, Inc. (the “Company”) has entered into an agreement with eachof the following persons, which is substantially identical to the formof Indemnification Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’sQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005.

 

Dwight D. Decker

 

Donald L. Gips

 

 Raouf Y. Halim

 

Michael T. Hayashi

 

Bret W. Johnsen

 

Ming Louie

 

Thomas A. Madden

 

Jerre L. Stead

 

----
511.1

- 1 (Adopted February 5, l988)

RULE 511.1 SUBPOENAS

(a) Subpoenas shall be issued by the Chairman of the Hearing Board upon written

application of the party requesting its issuance.

(b) Applications for subpoenas shall, at a minimum, include:

(1) a declara

tion under penalty of perjury as to why such witness or documents

are necessary to the proceeding; and

(2) a form of subpoena or subpoena duces tecum to be issued.

(c) Applications for subpoenas shall be submitted to the Clerk of the Board. The

party req uesting issuance of the subpoena shall give telephone notice that such

application is being made to the opposing party prior to submission of the

application.

(d) If a party objects to the issuance of a subpoena or subpoena duces tecum, the

opposing party

shall notify the Clerk of the Board of its opposition and may

request that a hearing be scheduled on the matter. The Clerk of the Board shall

notify both parties by telephone of the date, time and location of the hearing.
UNITED STATES CO URT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. KYLE A. HANAHAN, Defendant - Appellant. No. 15-1072 (D.C. No. 1:14-CR-00269-RM-1) (D. Colo.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before KELLY , HARTZ , and McHUGH , Circuit Judges.

Following his acceptance of a plea agreement that included a waiver of his right to appeal, Kyle A. Hanahan plead ed guilty to transportation of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(1) and (b)(1). He was sentenced to 108 months’ imprisonment. Despite hi s waiver, he filed an appeal. The government has moved to enfor ce Hanahan’s appeal waiver. See United States v.

Hahn , 359 F.3d 1315, 1328 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (per curiam).

* This panel has determined that oral ar gument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctr ines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It ma y be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32. 1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### July 7, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court- 2 - In evaluating a motion to enforce a waiv er, we consider: “(1) whether the disputed appeal falls within the scope of the waiver of appellate rights; (2) whether the defendant knowingly and voluntarily waiv ed his appellate rights; and (3) whether enforcing the waiver would result in a miscarriage of justice.” Id. at 1325. Hanahan’s counsel has filed a response in which Hanahan “concedes that the appeal waiver contained in his plea agreement is enforceable” under Hahn . Aplt. Resp. at 1. Our independent review confirms that the proposed issues for appeal fall within the scope of the waiver or raise a claim of ineff ective assistance of counsel that Hanahan may not pursue on direct appeal, see United States v. Edgar , 348 F.3d 867, 869 (10th Cir. 2003) (stating rule, with “rare exception” not a pplicable here, that

ineffective-assistance claims must be br ought in a collateral proceeding). The plea agreement clearly sets forth the appeal waiver and stat es that it was knowing and voluntary, and the district court discussed the waiver and confirmed Hanahan’s understanding of it during his change of plea hearing. Moreover, there is no evidence contradicting Hanahan’s knowin g and voluntary acceptance of the waiver. Finally,

there is no indication that en forcing the waiver would re sult in a mi scarriage of justice as defined in Hahn , 359 F.3d at 1327. The motion to enforce is granted and this matter is dismissed.

Entered for the Court Per Curiam
E-STAR HOLDINGS, INC. SUBSIDIARIES EXHIBIT 21



Worldsbestmemebership.com, Inc.
Radence Generation II, Ltd.
Pierre D'Alby Ltd.
All-Star Car Wash Acquisition Corp.
All-Star Car Wash of Centereach, Inc.
All-Star Car Wash of Centereach Realty, Inc.
All-Star Car Wash of Commack, Inc.
All-Star Car Wash of Commack Realty, Inc.
All-Star Car Wash of Copiague, Inc.
All-Star Car Wash of Copiague Realty, Inc.
All-Star Car Wash of Freeport, Inc.
All-Star Car Wash of Freeport Realty, Inc.
All-Star Car Wash of Oceanside, Inc.
All-Star Car Wash of Oceanside Realty, Inc.
All-Star Car Wash of Port Jefferson, Inc.
All-Star Car Wash of Port Jefferson Realty, Inc.
All-Star Car Wash of Sayville, Inc.
All-Star Car Wash of Sayville Realty, Inc.




<PAGE>
Exhibit 31.2

SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION

I, Jerry
Turin, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 29, 2013 of Oclaro, Inc.;
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: October 28, 2013 |  | /s/ Jerry Turin        
|                        |  | Jerry Turin            
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### Alison M. Lederer, Appellant, v. Field and Fancy Publishing Company, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton, Rich and Putnam, JJ.
### SUBCHAPTER III—NATIONAL HOMEOWNERSHIP TRUST DEMONSTRATION
AMENDMENT



 EXHIBIT 10.36.3 
  
 AMENDMENT 
  
 Amendment dated as of February 24, 2004 (the “Amendment”) to Amended and Restated Engagement Letter between Michael Warren Associates, Inc. (the
“Firm” or “Warren”) and BNS Co. (the “Client” or the “Company”) dated January 24, 2003 as amended to date (the “Agreement”). 
  
 WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Agreement to allow for the extension of services subject to the Agreement.

  
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of these premises and the
mutual promises set forth below, and for good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby given, the parties hereby agree as follows: 
  

	1.	The “Assignment Length” set forth in Addendum I to the Agreement is hereby amended to delete the phrase “One year from January 24, 2003, unless earlier
terminated” and replace the same with “From January 24, 2003 to and including December 31, 2004, unless earlier terminated”. 

  

	2.	Except as modified above, the Agreement as amended shall remain in full force and effect. 

  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has caused this Amendment to be duly executed and delivered as of the day first
above written. 
  

			
	 Michael Warren Associates, Inc.

		
	By:	 	/s/    MICHAEL WARREN
	 	 	

	 	 	Michael Warren
	
	 BNS Co.

		
	By:	 	/s/    KENNETH N. KERMES
	 	 	

	 	 	 Kenneth N. Kermes
 Chairman, Board of
Directors
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Foreign Agricultural Service 

# AGENCY:

Foreign Agricultural Service, USDA. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

The Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS), re-certified the trade adjustment assistance (TAA) petition that was filed by the Georgia Shrimp Association on behalf of Georgia shrimpers and initially certified on November 19, 2003. Shrimpers who land their catch in Georgia will be eligible to apply for fiscal year 2005 benefits during a 90-day period beginning on November 29, 2004. The application period closes on February 28, 2005. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Upon investigation, the Administrator determined that continued increases in imports of like or directly competitive products contributed importantly to a decline in the average landed price of shrimp in Georgia by 37.7 percent during the 2003 marketing period (January-December), compared to the 1997-2001 base period. Eligible producers may request technical assistance from the Extension Service at no cost and receive an adjustment assistance payment, if certain program criteria are satisfied. Producers in fiscal year 2005 who did not receive technical assistance under the fiscal year 2004 TAA program must obtain the technical assistance from the Extension Service by May 31, 2005, in order to be eligible for financial payments. 

Producers of raw agricultural commodities wishing to learn more about TAA and how they may apply should contact the Department of Agriculture at the addresses provided below for General Information. 

*Producers Certified as Eligible for TAA, Contact:*                     Farm Service Agency service centers.                 

*For General Information About TAA, Contact:*                     Jean-Louis Pajot, Coordinator, Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers, FAS, USDA, (202) 720-2916, e-mail:                     *trade.adjustment@fas.usda.gov.*

Dated: November 10, 2004. 

A. Ellen Terpstra, 

Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service. 

[FR Doc. 04-26086 Filed 11-23-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-10-P
NRC SCHEDULES MEETING WITH FPL TO DISCUSS APPLICATION

FOR NEW NUCLEAR UNITS AT THE TURKEY POINT SITE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a public meeting for Friday, 

Dec. 7, to discuss Florida Power and Light’s draft responses to NRC questions regarding the 

alternative site selection process described in the company’s combined license application for 

two new units at the Turkey Point nuclear plant site. 

The meeting is scheduled for 9:30 a.m. EST in Salon I and II at the Miami Marriott 

Dadeland, 9090 South Dadeland Blvd. in Miami. The meeting is open to the public and NRC 

officials will be available to answer questions after the business portion of the meeting.

FPL submitted an application in June 2009 seeking approval to build and operate two 

Westinghouse AP1000 reactors at the site about 20 miles south of Miami near Homestead, Fla. 

More information on the company’s application and the NRC review can found at

www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors/col/turkey-point.html.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No: II-12-067

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416 

 November 29, 2012

E-mail: OPA2.Resource@nrc.gov
### §412. Nondisclosure of lists of names and addresses

(a) Except as specifically provided by subsection (b) or other law, no officer or employee of the Postal Service shall make available to the public by any means or for any purpose any mailing or other list of names or addresses (past or present) of postal patrons or other persons.

(b) The Postal Service shall provide to the Secretary of Commerce for use by the Bureau of the Census such address information, address-related information, and point of postal delivery information, including postal delivery codes, as may be determined by the Secretary to be appropriate for any census or survey being conducted by the Bureau of the Census. The provision of such information under this subsection shall be in accordance with such mutually agreeable terms and conditions, including reimbursability, as the Postal Service and the Secretary of Commerce shall deem appropriate.

(Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 727; Pub. L. 103–430, §4, Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4394.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–430 substituted "(a) Except as specifically provided by subsection (b) or other law," for "Except as specifically provided by law," and added subsec. (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1971, pursuant to Resolution No. 71–9 of the Board of Governors. See section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note preceding section 101 of this title.
Section 1350 Certification

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


      In connection with the quarterly report of Pioneer Financial Services,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: (1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


Date:  August 13, 2004
                                    By:
                                       ----------------------------
                                       William D. Sullivan
                                       Chief Executive Officer
|                                                   |
|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                                   |  |
| Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): | March 16, 2016 (March 16, 2016) |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | CLARCOR Inc. |   |
|   | (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) |   |

|                                                                 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                 |  |  |
| Delaware                                                        |  1-11024 | 36-0922490 |
| (State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation or organization)   |  (Commission File Number) | (I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.) |
|                                                            |   |   |
| 840 Crescent Centre Drive, Suite 600, Franklin, Tennessee 37067 |
| (Address of principal executive offices)                        |

|                                                           |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                           |  |
| Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: | 615-771-3100 |

|                                                                                     |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                     |
| No Change                                                                           |
| (Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.) |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
|   |   |
| o      | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|   |   |
| o      | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|   |   |
| o      | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|   |   |
| o      | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |
|   |   |
|   |   |

----

|                |
|----------------|
|                |  |  |  |
| March 16, 2016 |   | By | /s/ RICHARD M. WOLFSON |
| (Date)         |   |   | Richard M. Wolfson |
|           |   |   | Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
|           |   |   |   |
Submitted on record and briefs August 4,

reversed and remanded December 27, 2000

#### Karl L. THOMPSON, *Appellant, v.*Catherine KNOX and Lanny Ryals, *Respondents.*

(M9906051; CA A106610)

15 P3d 626

Karl L. Thompson filed the briefs *pro se.*

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General, and Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondents.

Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Deits, Chief Judge, and Armstrong, Judge.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded. *Curtis v. Lampert,*171 Or App 336, 15 P3d 626 (2000).
NRC CREATES THREE BOARDS TO CONSIDER CONTENTIONS 

IN YUCCA MOUNTAIN HEARING 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel has 

established three boards to consider admissibility of contentions in the adjudicatory hearing 

over the geologic high-level nuclear waste repository proposed for Yucca Mountain, Nev. 

 Each board consists of three judges, two with legal expertise and one with technical 

expertise. Combined, the boards will consider and rule upon the admissibility of 

approximately 320 proposed contentions filed by 12 petitioners. These boards will consider 

only the standing of the petitioners and the admissibility of the contentions; additional boards 

will be established to rule on any contentions that are admitted for a hearing. 

 Procedures for the standing and admissibility phase of the hearing were set out in an 

ASLB order issued today. Petitioners will file their pleadings, responses and replies with all 

three boards, which will then allocate the contentions for consideration. The boards expect to 

hold oral arguments on standing and admissibility sometime this spring at the NRC’s Las 

Vegas Hearing Facility. 

 The Department of Energy submitted its application for the Yucca Mountain 

repository on June 3, 2008. The NRC staff docketed the application Sept. 8. A notice of 

opportunity to request a hearing was published in the Federal Register on Oct. 22, with 

petitions filed in December. 

 Petitioners include the states of Nevada and California, several Nevada counties, and 

Native American tribal groups. Two other Nevada counties filed requests to participate as 

interested government bodies. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a 

SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web 

site. 

 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 09-014 January 16, 2009
No. IV-12-039 

Contact: Victor Dricks (817) 200-1128 

 Lara Uselding (817) 200-1519 

 

 Sept. 21, 2012 

E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov 

NRC TO MEET WITH ENERGY NORTHWEST TO DISCUSS 

 COLUMBIA GENERATING STATION 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Energy Northwest 

officials on Oct 15 to discuss performance improvement initiatives for the Columbia Generating 

Station located near Richland, Wash. 

The meeting is open to public observation and will begin at 1 p.m. in the NRC’s Region 

IV office at 1600 E. Lamar Blvd., in Arlington, Texas. Members of the public will have an 

opportunity to ask questions or make comments after the business portion of the meeting is 

concluded. 

NRC officials and Energy Northwest officials will discuss licensee initiatives and 

progress in improving human performance at the plant. 

A phone bridge is available to members of the public by calling 1-888-469-0505 and 

entering pass code 54303. 

### 

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 1600 E. Lamar Blvd. 

 Arlington, TX 76011 - 4125 

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov