alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the annual report of Sierra Wireless, Inc. (the “Corporation”)on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Jason W. Cohenour, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

 

 

Datedat Richmond, BC, Canada this March 27, 2009.

 

 
| /s/ JASON W. COHENOUR   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Jason W. Cohenour       |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b) OR 15d-14(b) AND 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

Jon E. Kirchnerhereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.      He is thePresident and Chief Executive Officer of DTS, Inc.

2.      The Form 10-Qreport of DTS, Inc. for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

3.      Theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q report of DTS, Inc. for thequarterly period ended June 30, 2006 fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of DTS, Inc.

| Dated: August 9, 2006 |   |                                    |
|---------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|                            | By:    | /s/ JON E. KIRCHNER                     |
|                            |   | Jon E. Kirchner                         |
|                            |   | *President and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to DTS, Inc.and will be retained by DTS, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission upon request.

----
***EXHIBIT 31***

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Gilbert Burciaga, certify that:  

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K (“Report”) of Providence Resources, Inc.;  

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;   

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this Report;   

 

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:  

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;   

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and  

 

c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and   

 

5. I have disclosed based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):   

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and   

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

Date: April 1, 2008

 

/s/ Gilbert Burciaga  

Gilbert Burciaga, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

 

35

 

----
Mr. Barry R Stephens 

Director 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION 4 

ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 

61 FORSYTH STREET 

ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960 

JUN 1 9 2Dt4 

Tennessee Division of Air Pollution Control 

312 Rosa L. Parks Avenue 15th Floor 

Nashville, Tennessee 37243 

Dear Mr. Stephens: 

On March 17,2014, we received a revision to the Tennessee State Implementation Plan submitted by 

your agency on March 13, 2014. That revision pertains to Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements for section 

110(a)(2) (A-C), D(i)(II), D(ii), (E-H), and (J-M) for the 2010 nitrogen dioxide standards. We have 

completed our review of this submission and have determined that all of the required administrative and 

technical components for these aforementioned elements are present. Consistent with CAA timeframes, 

we will review the submission for approvability prior to preparing a rulemaking notice to take action on 

the revision. 

If you have questions about this letter, contact me or Lynorae Benjamin, Chief of the Regulatory 

Development Section, at (404) 562-9040. 

Sincerely, 

Air, Pesticides and Taxies 

Management Division 

Internet Address (URLI • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 30% Postconsumer)
#### Mike Mallerdino, Plaintiff-Appellant, *v.*Joseph Pollina *et al.,*Defendants-Appellees.

(No. 58448;

First District (2nd Division)

July 8, 1974.

Black and Wrobel, of Chicago, for appellant.

Denis R. Pollina, of Chicago, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.
#### § 911.1 Purpose.

These regulations set forth the procedural, informational and technical requirements for use of the NOAA Data Collection Systems (DCS). In addition, they establish the criteria NOAA will employ when making determinations as to whether to authorize the use of its space-based DCS. The regulations are intended to facilitate the collection of environmental data as well as other such data which the Government is interested in collecting. In those instances where space-based commercial systems do not meet users' requirements, the intent is to not disadvantage the development of the commercial space-based services in this sector. Obtaining a system use agreement to operate data collection platforms pursuant to these regulations does not affect related licensing requirements of other Federal agencies such as the Federal Communications Commission.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

March 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
134859 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134859 COA: 277727 Wayne CC: 02-008330-01 SPENCER HOGAN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the A ugust 9, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

s0317 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 24, 2008

Clerk
Exhibit B

Phantom 2 Vision Manual V1.8

Please download Exhibit B for review @

download.dji­innovations.com
#### Gerald J. Fareri, Respondent, v. Irene H. Fareri, Appellant.

No opinion. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
### SUBCHAPTER III—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF SCIENCE POLICY
#### Dennis Riddell et al., Appellants, v June A. Brown et al., Defendants, and Donald Beaver, Doing Business as Beaver Dairy Farm, Respondent.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[821 NYS2d 701]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Cattaraugus County (Larry M. Himelein, A.J.), entered July 5, 2005 in a personal injury action. The order granted the motion of defendant Donald Beaver, doing business as Beaver Dairy Farm, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against him and denied plaintiffs’ cross motion for leave to supplement the bill of particulars.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by denying the motion and reinstating the complaint against defendant Donald Beaver, doing business as Beaver Dairy Farm, and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action against Donald Beaver, doing business as Beaver Dairy Farm (defendant), and other defendants to recover damages for injuries they sustained when they struck an underground gas line, causing an explosion. It appears on the record before us that defendant failed to support his motion with a copy of the pleadings in the action. That failure requires denial of the motion, regardless of its merits *(see*CPLR 3212 [b]; *Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v Piper,*286 AD2d 903 [2001]; *Niles v County of Chautauqua,*285 AD2d 988, 989 [2001]). We therefore modify the order by denying the motion of defendant and reinstating the complaint against him. Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Kehoe, Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.
### SUBCHAPTER VII—AMERICAN INNOVATION AND MANUFACTURING
#### In the Matter of Hulan E. Jack, Respondent, against James M. Power et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, et al., Respondents, and Chauncey M. Hooper, Appellant.

The orders appealed from are reversed and petitions dismissed on the ground that the weight of the evidence sustains a finding of continued valid residence by respondent-appellant Hooper in the county of Hew York. All concur. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Breitel and Botein, JJ.
### §12521. Purpose

The purpose of this part is to promote service-learning as a strategy to—

(1) support high-quality service-learning projects that engage students in meeting community needs with demonstrable results, while enhancing students' academic and civic learning; and

(2) support efforts to build institutional capacity, including the training of educators, and to strengthen the service infrastructure to expand service opportunities.

(Pub. L. 101–610, title I, §111, as added Pub. L. 111–13, title I, §1201, Apr. 21, 2009, 123 Stat. 1467.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 12521, Pub. L. 101–610, title I, §111, as added Pub. L. 103–82, title I, §103(a)(2), Sept. 21, 1993, 107 Stat. 825, prescribed general authority of the Corporation for National and Community Service to make grants for service-learning programs, prior to the general amendment of this part by Pub. L. 111–13.

Another prior section 12521, Pub. L. 101–610, title I, §111, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3132; Pub. L. 102–10, §4(2), Mar. 12, 1991, 105 Stat. 30, prescribed general authority of Commission on National and Community Service to make grants for service-learning programs, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–82, title I, §103(a)(2), Sept. 21, 1993, 107 Stat. 825.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 2009, see section 6101(a) of Pub. L. 111–13, set out as an Effective Date of 2009 Amendment note under section 4950 of this title.
§ 702.2 Scope and purpose of surveys—avoiding duplicative requests for information. ( a ) BIS will not send any survey to any person for completion unless the scope and purpose of the survey have been established, that scope and purpose are consistent with BIS's authorities under the DPA, and the data requested by the survey does not duplicate adequate and authoritative data already available to BIS from a Federal or other authoritative source.
( b ) BIS personnel of appropriate competence and authority will ensure that the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section are met.
( c ) This section shall not be construed as limiting the criteria that BIS may consider in determining whether to proceed with a survey. This paragraph shall not be construed as replacing or in any way modifying the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*).
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 6 (Wednesday, January 9, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 99]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00012]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 10652]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Imported 
for Exhibition--Determinations: ``Monumental Journey: The 
Daguerreotypes of Girault de Prangey'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects to be included in the exhibition 
``Monumental Journey: The Daguerreotypes of Girault de Prangey,'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Metropolitan 
Museum of Art, New York, New York, from on or about January 29, 2019, 
until on or about May 12, 2019, and at possible additional exhibitions 
or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elliot Chiu, Attorney-Adviser, Office 
of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-
6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#65160006110c0a0b5751505c2516110411004b020a13"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fd8e989e89949293cfc9c8c4bd8e899c8998d39a928b">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the 
Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, 
et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 
of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 
2000.

Marie Therese Porter Royce,
Assistant Secretary, for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department 
of State.
[FR Doc. 2019-00012 Filed 1-8-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Grace Meehan v. Maylew Company, Inc.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs. Present—Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Smith, JJ.
No. I-13-025 May 28, 2013 

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330 E-mail: opa1.resource@nrc.gov

 Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331

International Safety Review Team to Perform Follow-up Assessment

at Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant

 An international team of nuclear safety experts will conduct a follow-up safety review at 

the Seabrook nuclear power plant from June 3 to 7. The focus of this review will be on the 

responses to the recommendations developed following an earlier, more comprehensive review 

of operational safety practices at the Seabrook, N.H., facility.

There will be four members on the follow-up team, including a team leader and deputy 

team leader from the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), an evaluator 

from France and an evaluator from Brazil.

The voluntary peer review, which is coordinated by the IAEA, is known as an 

Operational Safety Review Team (OSART) visit. The initial OSART assessment was conducted 

at the plant from June 7 to 23, 2011, by a 14-member team. Members of the team came from 

countries that included France, the United Kingdom, Sweden, Canada, China, Spain, Brazil, 

Russia and the Czech Republic.

While the NRC does not conduct the assessment, it does closely follow it and the 

outcomes, both for their safety significance and process improvements. No new safetysignificant issues were identified during the 2011 review. NRC staff reviewed the OSART draft 

and final reports. They agreed with the team’s findings and did not identify any issues requiring 

additional NRC review. The final OSART report is available in the NRC’s Agencywide 

Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) under accession number 

ML12081A105. ADAMS is available at: http://adams.nrc.gov/wba/ .

The OSART program was established by IAEA in 1982. It is designed to assist member 

states in enhancing the operational safety of nuclear power plants and fostering continuous 

improvement through the dissemination of information on best practices. The Seabrook OSART 

was the seventh such review of a U.S. nuclear power plant since the program’s launch.
No: II-14-034 June 16, 2014

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416 

NRC Assigns New Resident Inspector for Summer Nuclear Power Plant Construction

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Atlanta have selected Timothy Chandler as one of the resident 

inspectors for two new units under construction at SCE&G’s Summer nuclear power plant near Jenkinsville, S.C.

The Summer plant already has one operating unit and is located about 26 miles northwest of Columbia.

Chandler joins NRC Senior Resident Inspector Rahsean Jackson and Resident Inspectors Patrick Donnelly and 

David Failla at the Summer construction site. 

Timothy Chandler began his career in the NRC’s resident inspector development 

program in November 2007. In March 2008, he assumed the duties of resident inspector at the 

Vogtle nuclear plant in east Georgia and continued in that position until being assigned to the 

NRC’s Summer construction office. 

For 15 years prior to the NRC, Chandler worked as a lead process engineer in various 

Department of Energy facilities at the Savannah River Site, and was involved with the 

radioactive startup of two different DOE facilities. Prior to SRS, he spent five years working 

as a contract senior reactor operator at various commercial nuclear facilities, developing and 

conducting licensed operator training. 

Chandler is an 11-year veteran of the U.S. Navy’s nuclear power program, and was a qualified reactor 

operator on two different submarine reactor designs. He graduated summa cum laude from the University of 

Maryland with a Bachelor of Science degree in hazardous materials management. 

“Tim Chandler has the dedication and expertise to help ensure the remaining construction of Summer Unit 2 

and 3 is completed according to NRC regulations and in a way that protects people and the environment,” said NRC 

Region II Administrator Victor McCree.

At least two NRC resident inspectors are assigned to each operating U.S. commercial nuclear plant. They 

serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major work projects and 

interacting with plant workers and the public. Resident inspectors can serve at a reactor site for up to seven years.

Construction sites have their own resident inspectors and the number assigned depends on the work at each site.

The Summer construction resident inspectors can be reached at 803-345-6856.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
MediciNova, Inc. for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the Report), I, Yuichi Iwaki, Chief Executive Officer of MediciNova, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MediciNova, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.



Date:

November 9, 2007By:

/s/    YUICHI
IWAKIYuichi Iwaki, M.D., Ph.D. President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


This certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
### §12512. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–82, title I, §112, Sept. 21, 1993, 107 Stat. 861

Section, Pub. L. 101–610, title I, §102, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3132, authorized Commission to make grants to carry out programs under parts B, C, D, and E of this subchapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1993, see section 123 of Pub. L. 103–82, set out as an Effective Date of 1993 Amendment note under section 1701 of Title 16, Conservation.
All data has been removed from this file as a result of CBI sanitization. All data provided by vendors 

related to sand filter specifications is considered CBI or CBI deducible.