alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Maurice B. Tosé, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of TeleCommunicationSystems, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2003; 2. Based on my knowledge, this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this annual report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internalcontrol over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date ofthis Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (the “Evaluation Date”); and  c) presented in this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures basedon our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrols which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial data and have identifiedfor the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internalcontrols; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols.
6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in thisannual report whether there were significant changes in internal controlsor in other factors that could significantly affect internal controlssubsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including anycorrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses.   /s/ Maurice B. ToséMaurice B. Tosé
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Stephen N. Ananias, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Mindspeed Technologies, Inc.; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 15, 2013



/s/ STEPHEN N. ANANIASStephen N. Ananias Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




7
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 25 (Friday, February 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 5871]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2616]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-53,515B; TA-W-53,515E; TA-W-53,515I; and TA-W-53,515K]


Thomasville Furniture Industries, Inc., CDK/CPS, Thomasville, NC; 
Thomasville Furniture Industries, Inc., Plant M, Thomasville, NC; 
Thomasville Furniture Industries, Inc., Warehouse, Thomasville, NC; and 
Thomasville Furniture Industries, Inc., Lenoir Plant, Lenoir, NC; 
Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on November 13, 2003, in response to a 
petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of 
Thomasville Furniture Industries, Inc., CDK/CPS, Thomasville, North 
Carolina (TA-W-53,515B); Thomasville Furniture Industries, Inc., Plant 
M, Thomasville, North Carolina (TA-W-53,515E); Thomasville Furniture 
Industries, Inc., Warehouse, Thomasville, North Carolina (TA-W-
53,515I); and Thomasville Furniture Industries, Inc., Lenoir Plant, 
Lenoir, North Carolina (TA-W-53,515K).
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 13th day of January, 2004.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-2616 Filed 2-5-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
----

----

**Exhibit        32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

| 1. | The                  Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section                  13(a) or                  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                  information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,                  in all                  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                  of                  the Company at the end of the periods covered by the Quarterly                  Report. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|-------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:                  May 21, 2007 |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|                                | By:    | /s/                  *James                  Price                                     * |
|                                |   | James                  Price                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|                                |   | Chief                  Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |

----
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JAMES BRETT ZIMMERMAN,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-17471

D.C. Nos. 3:08-cv-00203-LRHVPC

3:05-cr-00241-LRHVPC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 9, 2012** 

San Francisco, California

Before: FARRIS, NOONAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

James Brett Zimmerman appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for

habeas corpus. We review the district court’s denial of a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion

FILED

NOV 16 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

de novo, United States v. Gamba, 541 F.3d 895, 898 (9th Cir. 2008), and now

affirm.

Zimmerman, who was previously convicted of felony robbery and burglary,

pleaded guilty to one count of bank robbery and was sentenced to a prison term. 

During the plea negotiations, the government promised not to pursue a federal

three strikes charge in exchange for Zimmerman’s guilty plea. See 18 U.S.C. §

3559(c)(1)(A) (defendants convicted of a serious violent felony who have

previously been convicted of at least two additional serious violent felonies are

subject to life imprisonment). Zimmerman now claims that the government’s

promise was illusory because he did not use or threaten to use a firearm or

dangerous weapon during his robberies, and therefore qualifies for a statutory

exception to the three strikes rule. See id. § 3559(c)(3)(A). 

Zimmerman is mistaken. Because he had more than two prior serious

violent felony convictions, the government could have charged him under the three

strikes statute. See id. § 3559(c)(1)(A). Zimmerman would then have had the

burden of proving that he qualified for the exception. The existence of the

exception makes no difference to the government’s charging decision. See United

States v. Kaluna, 192 F.3d 1188, 1196 (9th Cir. 1999). The government’s promise

not to pursue a three-strikes charge against Zimmerman was not illusory.
3

Zimmerman claims ineffective assistance of counsel based on his attorney’s

failure to investigate his criminal history. Primarily because the outcome of a three

strikes proceeding was not foreseeable at the time of the plea negotiation,

Zimmerman fails to show prejudice resulting from the allegedly deficient

performance of his attorney. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 688

(1984). Because Zimmerman does not show prejudice, he is not entitled to relief.

The district court is AFFIRMED.
No: IV-14-007 April 23, 2014

CONTACT: Victor Dricks (817) 200-1128

Lara Uselding (817) 100-1519

NRC Schedules Regulatory Conference to Discuss Apparent Violation

At Wolf Creek Nuclear Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with officials from Wolf Creek Nuclear 

Operating Corp. April. 30 to discuss a preliminary inspection finding associated with emergency 

preparedness at the Wolf Creek nuclear plant. The plant is located near Burlington, Kan. 

The 2 p.m. meeting at the NRC’s Region IV office at 1600 E. Lamar Blvd, Arlington, Texas, is 

open to the public. NRC officials will answer questions from the public after the business portion of the 

conference. A telephone bridge will be available for the meeting by calling 1-888-324-3612 and 

entering passcode 1383890.

The NRC evaluates regulatory performance at commercial nuclear plants with a color-coded 

process that classifies inspection findings as green, white, yellow or red in order of increasing safety 

significance. The NRC has preliminarily determined that the emergency preparedness finding had low 

to moderate safety significance, or was “white.”

NRC inspectors observed and evaluated a regularly scheduled emergency preparedness exercise 

at the site on Nov. 5, 2013. During the exercise, the NRC found that the licensee had not addressed a 

previously identified error involving software used to assess offsite radiation dose during a plant 

emergency. Dose assessment is a key component of a plant operator’s emergency response and it is 

important that it be accurate.

The NRC report details the inspection findings. No decision on the final safety significance of 

the findings or any additional NRC actions will be made at the conference. That decision will be 

announced at a later time.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2460 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2460

   To provide for the conveyance of the reversionary interest of the 
    United States in certain lands to the Clint Independent School 
                    District, El Paso County, Texas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 2003

  Mr. Reyes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                  Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for the conveyance of the reversionary interest of the 
    United States in certain lands to the Clint Independent School 
                    District, El Paso County, Texas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF PROPERTY.

    (a) Conveyance.--Subject to section 2, the Secretary of State shall 
execute and file in the appropriate office such instrument as may be 
necessary to release the reversionary interest of the United States in 
the land referred to in subsection (b).
    (b) Land Described.--The land described in this subsection consists 
of Tracts 4-B, 5, and 7, Block 14, San Elizario Grant, County of El 
Paso, State of Texas.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    The release under section 1 shall be made upon condition that the 
Clint Independent School District in the County of El Paso, State of 
Texas, use any proceeds received from the disposal of such land for 
public educational purposes.
                                 <all>
```
FORM 10-Q CERTIFICATION

I, Darwin L. Stump, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PDC 2002-B Limited Partnership;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

	(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 12, 2003
 /s/ Darwin L. Stump                                 

Darwin L. Stump

Chief Financial Officer of Petroleum Development Corporation 

Managing General Partner of PDC 2002-B Limited Partnership
#### §§ 1.111-1.119 [Reserved]
Editorial Note on Part 922
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

§ 922.30 National Marine Sanctuary general permits. ( a ) *Authority to issue general permits.* The Director may allow a person to conduct an activity that would otherwise be prohibited by this part through issuance of a general permit, provided the applicant complies with: ( 1 ) The provisions of this subpart; and
( 2 ) The permit procedures and criteria for all national marine sanctuaries in which the proposed activity is to take place in accordance with relevant site-specific regulations appearing in subparts F through U of this part.
( b ) *Sanctuary general permit categories.* The Director may issue a sanctuary general permit under this subpart and the relevant site-specific subpart, subject to such terms and conditions as he or she deems appropriate, if the Director finds that the proposed activity falls within one of the following categories or a category in the relevant site-specific subpart: ( 1 ) Research—activities that constitute scientific research or scientific monitoring of a national marine sanctuary resource or quality;
( 2 ) Education—activities that enhance public awareness, understanding, or appreciation of a national marine sanctuary or national marine sanctuary resource or quality;
( 3 ) Management—activities that assist in managing a national marine sanctuary;
( 4 ) Jade removal—the removal of loose jade from the Jade Cove area, without the use of pneumatic, mechanical, electrical, hydraulic or explosive tools, within Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary that cannot be collected under 15 CFR 922.132(a)(1)(ii) and (iii). Preference will be given for applications proposing to collect loose pieces of jade for research or educational purposes;
( 5 ) Tribal self-determination—activities conducted by a Washington Coast treaty tribe and/or its designee as certified by the governing body of the tribe to promote or enhance tribal self-determination, tribal government functions, the exercise of treaty rights, the economic development of the tribe, subsistence, ceremonial and spiritual activities, or the education or training of tribal members; and
( 6 ) Further FKNMS purposes—activities that further the purposes of Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary, including those that facilitate multiple use of the sanctuary, to the extent compatible with the primary objective of resource protection.
§ 917.41 Application guidance for Sea Grant funding. ( a ) Detailed guidance for submission of applications for National Sea Grant Program Funding is given in the publication, “The National Sea Grant Program: Program Description and Suggestions for Preparing Proposals,” available on request from: Office of Sea Grant Program, 3300 Whitehaven Street NW., Washington, DC 20235.
( b ) It is noted here that application for Sea Grant funding shall be made pursuant to the following Federal provisions: ( 1 ) OMB Circular A-110 “Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other Non-Profit Organizations.”
( 2 ) OMB Circular A-111, “Designation of Federal Programs Suitable for Joint Funding Purposes.”
( 3 ) GSA FMC 73-6, “Coordinating Indirect Cost Rates and Audit at Educational Institutions.”
( 4 ) GSA FMC 73-7, “Administration of College and University Research Grants.”
( 5 ) GSA FMC 73-8, “Cost Principles for Educational Institutions.”
( 6 ) GSA FMC 74-4, “Cost Principles Applicable to Grants and Contracts with State and Local Governments.”
( 7 ) OMB Circular A-102, “Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants-in-Aid to State and Local Governments.”
( 8 ) NOAA General Provisions implementing OMB Circular A-110, “Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other Non-Profit Organizations.”