alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, Darwin L. Stump, the Chief Financial Officer of Petroleum Development Corporation, the managing general partner of PDC 2002-B Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"),  hereby certify that: 

- I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Partnership (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;
- the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

/s/ Darwin L. Stump                  

Name: Darwin L. Stump

Title: Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 12, 2003
§ 960.6 Application categorization. ( a ) Within seven days of the Secretary's notification to the applicant under § 960.5(c) that the application is complete, the Secretary shall determine, after consultation with the Secretaries of Defense and State as appropriate, the category for the system as follows: ( 1 ) If the application proposes a system with the capability to collect unenhanced data substantially the same as unenhanced data already available from entities or individuals not licensed under this part, such as foreign entities, the Secretary shall categorize the application as Tier 1;
( 2 ) If the application proposes a system with the capability to collect unenhanced data substantially the same as unenhanced data already available, but only from entities or individuals licensed under this part, the Secretary shall categorize the application as Tier 2; and
( 3 ) If the application proposes a system with the capability to collect unenhanced data not substantially the same as unenhanced data already available from any domestic or foreign entity or individual, the Secretary shall categorize the application as Tier 3.
( b ) If the Secretary of Defense or State disagrees with the Secretary's determination in paragraph (a) of this section, the Secretary of Defense or State may notify the Secretary and request the Secretary's reconsideration. Such a request for reconsideration may not be delegated below the Assistant Secretary level. If the Secretary of Defense or State disagrees with the Secretary's reconsideration decision, the Secretary of Defense or State may appeal that tier categorization pursuant to the interagency dispute resolution procedures in Section IV(B) of the MOU, but only at the Advisory Committee on Private Remote Sensing Space Systems level or higher. The Secretary shall categorize the system in accordance with the decision resulting from such MOU procedures.
( c ) The system shall remain in the tier assigned to it under paragraph (a) in this section until such time as the Secretary determines, after consultation with the Secretaries of Defense and State as appropriate, that the system belongs in a lower-numbered tier due to the advancement of non-U.S. commercial remote sensing capabilities or due to other facts, or until the Secretary grants the licensee's request for a license modification that results in re-categorization under § 960.13. When the Secretary determines that a lower-numbered tier is appropriate due to reasons other than a modification under § 960.13, the Secretary will notify the applicant or licensee in writing that the system falls under a lower-numbered tier than the one previously assigned under this section. Upon receiving that notification, the applicant or licensee will be responsible for complying only with the license conditions applicable to the new tier.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Thomas Lecas, Respondent, against Schramm’s Esso Station et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Employer and its insurance carrier appeal from a decision of Workmen’s Compensation Board awarding compensation to claimant for 100% loss of the left eye. Appellants argue that the board’s finding that the loss of vision is causally related to the accident of January 4, 1951, is contrary to and not supported by the substantial probative evidence in the record. Claimant worked days at the employer’s service station and nights as a guard at Chase National Bank. On the day mentioned, as he was filling the tank of an automobile, the hose broke and the escaping gasoline struck him in the face and eyes. He went to the men’s room of the station where he applied cold water to them. Later he consulted a physician who referred him to an eye specialist. The latter’s examination disclosed a 20/60 vision in the right eye, and all claimant could then see with his- left eye were objects through a pinhole. The board’s finding that the breaking of the hose and the gasoline striking his left eye and face caused him to sustain accidental injuries in the nature of corneal abrasion, ruptured choroid, and hemorrhage of the retina, all of the left eye, with 100% loss of vision thereof is substantially supported by the evidence. There was testimony that in operating the hose claimant had his head close to the gasoline tank in order to see that it did not overflow and that the full pressure of the gasoline hit him in the face when the hose burst. In appellants’ application for review it was stated that the Esso Corporation had advised that the hose pressure of gasoline in the tanks at retail pumps is twenty pounds and that the position valve to shut off the pump is set at thirty pounds. This statement was not controverted. There was substantial medical testimony that a severe blow to the eye, such as would result from the impact of a liquid pressure of from twenty to thirty pounds, would be sufficient to produce the injuries which caused claimant’s loss of vision. Decision and award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Imrie, JJ.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Gregory W. Freiberg, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of XO Holdings, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in the Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or causedsuch internal control over financial reporting to be designed underour supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding thereliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.Date: April 30, 2007/s/ Gregory W. Freiberg
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Mark H. McKinnies, as Chief Financial Officer of ADA-Es, Inc. (the
Company), certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Mark H. McKinnies
|Name:                 |  | Mark H. McKinnies      
|Title:                |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:                 |  | November 7, 2007
### Part A—Establishment of Program; Advisory Committee
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 13-13367

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cv-00617-HLA-TEM

NELLIE ANNETTE BROWN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

PUTNAM COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT HEALTHY FAMILIES, et al.,

Defendants,

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, GOVERNMENT AGENCY, 

Defendant-Appellee.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(January 2, 2014)

Before HULL, MARCUS and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 13-13367 Date Filed: 01/02/2014 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Nellie Brown appeals pro se the dismissal of her third amended complaint. 

The district court dismissed Brown’s complaint for failure to perfect service of 

process, and Brown does not challenge that ruling. See Timson v. Sampson, 518 

F.3d 870, 874 (11th Cir. 2008). The district court instructed Brown how to perfect 

service of process and what party to name as the proper defendant, gave her three 

opportunities to comply with those instructions, and warned her that the failure to 

perfect service of her third amended complaint would result in dismissal.

Although we treat pro se litigants like Brown leniently, “we nevertheless ... 

require[ ] them to conform to procedural rules.” Albra v. Advan, Inc., 490 F.3d 

826, 829 (11th Cir. 2007) (quoting Loren v. Sasser, 309 F.3d 1296, 1304 (11th Cir.

2002)).

We AFFIRM the dismissal of Brown’s third amended complaint.

Case: 13-13367 Date Filed: 01/02/2014 Page: 2 of 2
No: 13-067 August 13, 2013

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200

NRC Meeting Aug. 22 in Rockville, Md., to Discuss Review

of Faster Transfer of Spent Fuel to Dry Casks

NRC staff will discuss ongoing analysis of spent fuel transfer with the public on Aug. 22 in 

Rockville, Md. The staff, as part of the NRC’s response to the 2011 Fukushima nuclear accident, has 

been examining potentially faster transfer of spent fuel into “dry cask” facilities.

The meeting will run from 9-11:30 a.m. EDT in the Commission Hearing Room of the NRC’s 

White Flint complex at 11555 Rockville Pike in Rockville. NRC staff will describe their ongoing 

analysis on whether faster transfers should be required. The analysis is based in part on a recent draft 

report comparing the effects of a very strong earthquake on one type of fully loaded spent fuel pool 

versus the same pool with a minimal amount of spent fuel. 

The meeting will include a teleconference and webinar for those unable to attend in person. 

Interested groups and the public will have the opportunity to ask questions and provide feedback on the 

staff’s analysis. Please contact Kevin Witt at 301-415-2145 or kevin.witt@nrc.gov for teleconference 

information (to ensure appropriate resources are available) or for questions about the meeting.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3528 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3528

 To amend the Hate Crime Statistics Act to include crimes against the 
                               homeless.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 30, 2011

Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas (for herself, Ms. Wasserman Schultz, 
   Mr. Davis of Illinois, Mrs. Napolitano, Mr. Cohen, and Ms. Moore) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Hate Crime Statistics Act to include crimes against the 
                               homeless.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hate Crimes Against the Homeless 
Statistics Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF HOMELESS.

    Section 1(b) of the Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note) 
is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ``homeless status,'' 
        after ``sexual orientation,''; and
            (2) by adding the the end the following:
            ``(6) As used in this subsection, the term `homeless 
        status' with respect to an individual, refers to an individual 
        who--
                    ``(A) lacks a fixed, regular, and adequate 
                nighttime residence; or
                    ``(B) has a primary nighttime residence that is--
                            ``(i) a public or private place not 
                        designed for, or ordinarily used as, a regular 
                        sleeping accommodation for human beings, 
                        including cars, parks, public spaces, abandoned 
                        buildings, substandard housing, bus or train 
                        stations, or similar settings;
                            ``(ii) a supervised publicly or privately 
                        operated shelter designed to provide temporary 
                        living accommodations, including motels, 
                        hotels, congregate shelters, and transitional 
                        housing; or
                            ``(iii) housing of other persons in which 
                        the individual is temporarily staying due to 
                        loss of housing, economic hardship, or a 
                        similar reason.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                           by Chief Executive Officer

     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  VSB  Bancorp,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on or about the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Merton Corn,  President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: May 8, 2007

                                                /s/ Merton Corn
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Merton Corn, President and CEO

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       26
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofstreetTRACKS® Gold Trust (the"Trust") on Form 10-Q for the period endingJune 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. StuartThomas, principal executive officer of World Gold Trust Services, LLC,the Sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations ofthe Trust.

/s/ J. StuartThomas*        

J. Stuart Thomas**Managing Director(principal executive officer) August 10,2005

|         |                                                                                                                                                      |
|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| *  | The originally executed copy ofthis Certification will be maintained at the Sponsor's officesand will be made available for inspection upon request. |

|          |                                                                                                                                              |
|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| **  | The Registrant is a trust and Mr. Thomas is signingin his capacity as an officer of World Gold Trust Services, LLC, thesponsor of the Trust. |

----
### §8736. Execution of deeds

The Mayor of the District of Columbia may execute deeds of conveyance for real estate sold under this subchapter. The deeds shall contain a full description of the land sold as required by law.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1227.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8736 | 40:72e. | Aug. 5, 1939, ch. 449, §3, 53 Stat. 1211. |

Section

The word "proper" is omitted as unnecessary. The words "as required by" are substituted for "either by metes and bounds, or otherwise according to" to eliminate unnecessary words.
Exhibit 31.1

FORM 10-Q CERTIFICATION

I, Steven R. Williams, certify that:

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's first fiscal quarter of 2004 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the board of directors of the Managing General Partner of the registrant;

(a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:  May 13, 2004               
 /s/ Steven R. Williams                           

Steven R. Williams

Chief Executive Officer of the 

Managing General Partner of the Registrant
### SUBCHAPTER VII—MUNICIPALITIES
Exhibit 32


CERTIFICATION





In connection with the periodic report of The Clorox Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2020, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), we, Benno Dorer, Chair and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Kevin B. Jacobsen, Executive Vice President – Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to our knowledge:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.





This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.





Date: August 13, 2020





/s/ Benno DorerBenno DorerChair and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Kevin B. JacobsenKevin B. JacobsenExecutive Vice President – Chief Financial Officer