alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-0732 Directorate Identifier: 2012-CE-022-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Incorporating the 

new limitations 

(maintaining from 

2009-14-13)

3.5 $ 297.50 $0 $ 297.50 678 $201,705.00

Inspection/preparati

on wing spar 

(added limitation)

12.0 $1,020.0

0

0 $1,020.00 678 $691,560.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $893,265

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $0

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product
necessary

corrective actions 

based on revised 

limitations (from 

2009-14-13)

6.0 $ 510.00 $4,000 $4,510.00

repair spar if 

needed 7.0 $ 595.00 $5,000 $5,595.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
Exhibit
32 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350)   In connection with
the amended quarterly Report of Hitor Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation
(the Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Ken Martin,
CEO and CAO of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.     /s/ Ken
Martin_______________ Ken Martin, CEO, CAO Dated:  November 23, 2009
### §10903. Definitions

For purposes of this chapter—

(1) the term "eligible individual" means a candidate for the Child Development Associate credential whose income does not exceed the 1 130 percent of the lower living standard income level,2 by more than 50 percent;

(2) the term "lower living standard income level" means that income level (adjusted for regional, metropolitan, urban, and rural differences and family size) determined annually by the Secretary of Labor and based on the most recent lower living family budget issued by the Secretary of Labor;

(3) the term "Secretary" means the Secretary of Health and Human Services; and

(4) the term "State" means each of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the Virgin Islands, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the Marshall Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, and Palau.

(Pub. L. 99–425, title VI, §604, Sept. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 976; Pub. L. 101–501, title V, §502, Nov. 3, 1990, 104 Stat. 1256.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1990—Par. (1). Pub. L. 101–501, §502(1), substituted "130 percent of the lower living standard income level" for "poverty line, as defined in section 9902(2) of this title".

Pars. (2) to (4). Pub. L. 101–501, §502(2), (3), added par. (2) and redesignated former pars. (2) and (3) as (3) and (4), respectively.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1990 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 101–501 effective Oct. 1, 1990, see section 1001(a) of Pub. L. 101–501, set out as a note under section 8621 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1986, see section 1001 of Pub. L. 99–425, set out as an Effective Date of 1986 Amendment note under section 8621 of this title.

1 So in original. The word "the" probably should not appear.

2 So in original. The comma probably should not appear.
ASSET DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT

THIS AGREEMENT made as of the 10th day of December, 2003.

BETWEEN:

SPECTRE INDUSTRIES INC., 6 - 260 East Esplanade, North Vancouver, British Columbia, V7L 1A3

(hereinafter called the "Parent")

OF THE FIRST PART

AND:

SPECTRE HOLDINGS INC., 6 - 260 East Esplanade, North Vancouver, British Columbia, V7L 1A3

(hereinafter called the "Subsidiary")

OF THE SECOND PART

WITNESSES THAT WHEREAS:

A.	The Parent is the registered and beneficial owner of all of the issued and outstanding shares in the capital of the Subsidiary;

B.	The Parent and the Subsidiary desire to provide for a rollover of the assets of the Parent to the Subsidiary;

C.	The Parent and the Subsidiary desire to have all of the property, assets and undertaking of the Parent as a going concern distributed to the Subsidiary, in trust, pending approval of the shareholders of the Parent;

D.	On receipt of shareholder approval, all of the property, assets and undertaking of the Parent will be distributed to the Subsidiary; and

E.	The Parent has agreed to distribute to the Subsidiary all of the property, assets and undertaking of the Parent as a going concern.

THEREFORE in consideration of the premises and other good and valuable consideration (the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged by each of the parties hereto), the parties hereto agree as follows:

1.	Upon execution of this Agreement, the Parent hereby distributes to the Subsidiary all of the property, assets and undertaking of the Parent as a going concern, to be held in trust by the Subsidiary to the benefit of the Parent until the Closing Date (as hereinafter defined).

2.	On the Closing Date (as hereinafter defined) the Parent will distribute all of its assets to the Subsidiary free and clear of all liens, claims, charges, encumbrances, charters or restrictions whatsoever, at their cost to the Parent, and the Subsidiary will assume all liabilities and obligations of the Subsidiary.

3.	The "Closing Date" shall be the date of shareholder approval of the shareholders of the Parent to the distribution contemplated herein.

4.	This Agreement shall enure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties and their respective successors and assigns.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the 10th day of December, 2003.

SPECTRE INDUSTRIES INC.

per:

/s/ Matthew Markin					Authorized Signatory



SPECTRE HOLDINGS INC.

per:

/s/ Ian S. Grant					Authorized Signatory









This is page 2 of the Asset Distribution Agreement between Spectre Industries Inc. and Spectre Holdings Inc. dated the 10th day of December, 2003.
#### David M. Dorin, Respondent, v. Earl Brown, Appellant.

Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously modified so as to permit defendant to replead paragraphs 26 and 27 of his answer in mitigation of compensatory and punitive damages, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
Exhibit 10.5


                               THIRD AMENDMENT TO
                         AMERICAN RETIREMENT CORPORATION
                          EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

    The American Retirement Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan is hereby
amended, effective September 19, 2003, as follows:

 1.  By deleting the last sentence of Section 1.1 in its entirety and
     substituting therefore the following:

     "This Plan shall be known as the American Retirement Corporation Associate
     Stock Purchase Plan."

 2.  By deleting Section 2.15 in its entirety and substituting therefore
     the following:

     "2.15 Plan: American Retirement Corporation Associate Stock Purchase Plan."
           ----

 3.  By deleting the first sentence of Section 4.1 in its entirety and
     substituting therefore the following:

     "Each  Employee  shall  become  eligible to become a  Participant  for each
     Option Period on its  Commencement  Date if such Employee has been employed
     by the Employer for a continuous  period of at least three (3) months prior
     to the Commencement Date."

 4.  By  deleting  the  second  sentence  of  Section  4.4 in its  entirety  and
     substituting therefore the following:

     "In the case of an  acquisition,  credit shall be given to Employees of the
     acquired  Subsidiary  for  service  with  such  corporation  prior  to  the
     acquisition  for purposes of satisfying  the  requirement of Section 4.1 of
     three (3) months continuous employment."
### §12651c. Chief Executive Officer

#### (a) Appointment

The Corporation shall be headed by an individual who shall serve as Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, and who shall be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.

#### (b) Compensation

The Chief Executive Officer shall be compensated at the rate provided for level III of the Executive Schedule under section 5314 of title 5, plus 3 percent.

#### (c) Regulations

The Chief Executive Officer shall prescribe such rules and regulations as are necessary or appropriate to carry out the national service laws.

(Pub. L. 101–610, title I, §193, as added and amended Pub. L. 103–82, title II, §§202(a), 203(a)(1)(B), Sept. 21, 1993, 107 Stat. 877, 891; Pub. L. 111–13, title I, §1703, Apr. 21, 2009, 123 Stat. 1545.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2009—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 111–13 inserted ", plus 3 percent" before period at end.

1993—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 103–82, §203(a)(1)(B), which directed amendment of section 193(c) of subtitle I of the National and Community Service Act of 1990 by substituting "the national service laws" for "this chapter", was executed to subsec. (c) of this section, which is section 193 of subtitle G of title I of the National Community Service Act of 1990, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2009 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–13 effective Oct. 1, 2009, see section 6101(a) of Pub. L. 111–13, set out as a note under section 4950 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1993 Amendment

Amendment by section 203(a)(1)(B) of Pub. L. 103–82 effective Apr. 4, 1994, see section 203(d) of Pub. L. 103–82, set out as a note under section 12651 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Sept. 21, 1993, see section 202(i)(2) of Pub. L. 103–82, set out as a note under section 12651 of this title.

#### Regulations

Pub. L. 111–13, title VI, §6101(b), Apr. 21, 2009, 123 Stat. 1600, provided that: "Effective on the date of enactment of this Act [Apr. 21, 2009], the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation for National and Community Service may issue such regulations as may be necessary to carry out this Act [see Short Title of 2009 Amendment note set out under section 12501 of this title] and the amendments made by this Act."
STATE OF TEXAS

VS.

SHELTON WADE MONTGOMERY,

EX PARTE

g,3,^>-?S"-&\

NO. WR-83,375-01

CAUSE NO. 4762A

*

*

IN THE 100th DISTRICT COURT

*

*

IN AND FOR

* CARSON COUNTY, TEXAS

ORDER OF THE COURT

Pursuant to the Order ofthe Court ofCriminal Appeals the Clerk ofthe Court ofCarson County

is ordered to make the affidavit ofPaul Herrmann part ofthe appellate record as a supplemental record.

Further the Clerk ofthe Court is ordered to forward a copy ofthe Courts Order to Shelton

Montgomery.

s&/^€^2^,

Stuart M. Messer, District Judge Presiding

RECEIVED IN

50UBTOFCRIMINAL APPEALS

NOV 02 2015

!«a.et»
**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**AND
      PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**




In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
      Mortgagebrokers.com Holdings, Inc. for the Quarter Ending March 31, 2007, I,
      Alex Haditaghi, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
      of
      Mortgagebrokers.com Holdings, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      to
      the best of my knowledge and belief, that:




1.
        Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period
      ending March 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
        The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
      for the period ended March 31, 2007, fairly represents in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of Mortgagebrokers.com
      Holdings, Inc.




Dated:
                May 21, 2007





**MORTGAGEBROKERS.COM
      HOLDINGS, INC.**





By:
            */s/****Alex
                Haditaghi*
              Alex
                Haditaghi
              Chief Executive
                Officer,
              Chief
                Financial Officer and
              Principal
                Accounting Officer
### subpart 4—grants to private entities
|  |  | Framework Publications- Development of a National Digital Geospatial Data Framework , April 1995.    Fact Sheet on the National Digital Geospatial Data Framework.Framework Introduction and Guide |
|--|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
§ 930.62 State agency concurrence with a consistency certification. ( a ) At the earliest practicable time, the State agency shall notify the Federal agency and the applicant whether the State agency concurs with or objects to a consistency certification. The State agency may issue a general concurrence for minor activities (*see* § 930.53(b)). Concurrence by the State agency shall be conclusively presumed if the State agency's response is not received within six months following commencement of State agency review.
( b ) If the State agency has not issued a decision within three months following commencement of State agency review, it shall notify the applicant and the Federal agency of the status of the matter and the basis for further delay.
( c ) If the State agency issues a concurrence or is conclusively presumed to concur with the applicant's consistency certification, the Federal agency may approve the federal license or permit application. Notwithstanding State agency concurrence with a consistency certification, the federal permitting agency may deny approval of the federal license or permit application. Federal agencies should not delay processing applications pending receipt of a State agency's concurrence. In the event a Federal agency determines that an application will not be approved, it shall immediately notify the applicant and the State agency.
( d ) During the period when the State agency is reviewing the consistency certification, the applicant and the State agency should attempt, if necessary, to agree upon conditions, which, if met by the applicant, would permit State agency concurrence. The parties shall also consult with the Federal agency responsible for approving the federal license or permit to ensure that proposed conditions satisfy federal as well as management program requirements (*see also* § 930.4).
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Endeavour International
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Robert L. Thompson, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

               1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                    13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

               2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                    operations of the Company.

                                                    /s/ Robert L. Thompson
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Robert L. Thompson
                                                    Chief Accounting Officer

                                                    Date:  March 30, 2004

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Endeavour International Corporation and will be retained by
Endeavour International Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
### SUBCHAPTER VII—NEAR-EARTH OBJECTS
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. American Weekly, Inc., Respondent, against William E. Boyland et al., Constituting the Tax Commission of the City of New York, Appellants. [63 Vesey St., Borough of Manhattan.]

Order unanimously modified so as to fix the value for the property designated as Block 85, Lot 6, for each year under review as follows: Land $275,000, Building $300,000, Total $575,000. As so modified the order is affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellants. In our opinion on this record no other values are justified. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore and Breitel, JJ.
#### Paul Sheldon and Others, Respondents, v. Leopold Loevin, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present— Clarke, P. J., Scott, Smith, Page and Davis, JJ.
#### Leader A. G. et al., Respondents, v. Douglas Campbell et al., Copartners under the Name of Campbell Harding Goodwin & Danforth, et al., Defendants, and Jan A. Bata, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. No opinion. Present — Dore, J. P., Callahan, Breitel and Bastow, JJ. [See *post,*p. 942.]
§ 1.100 Administrative wage garnishment. ( a ) *General.* The Commission may use administrative wage garnishment for debts, including those referred to Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Department of Treasury, for cross-servicing. Regulations in 31 CFR 285.11 govern the collection of delinquent nontax debts owed to federal agencies through administrative garnishment of non-Federal wages. Whenever the Bureau of the Fiscal Service collects such a debt for the Commission using administrative wage garnishment, the statutory administrative requirements in 31 CFR 285.11 will govern.
( b ) *Hearing official.* Any hearing required to establish the Commission's right to collect a debt through administrative wage garnishment shall be conducted by a qualified individual selected at the discretion of the Chairman of the Commission, as specified in 31 CFR 285.11.
[75 FR 68418, Nov. 8, 2010, as amended at 81 FR 2742, Jan. 19, 2016]
#### Edwin C. Smith and Another, Respondents, v. Pure Strain Farm Company, Appellant, Impleaded with Frederick A. Brotsch, Jr., and Others.

Order affirmed with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Held, appellant was guilty of such laches in not applying to be made a party until the case was on the day calendar and about to be tried as justified the conditions imposed by the order. All concurred.
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(C) OF THE U.S.SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED**

 

I,David G. McLennan, certify that:

 

1.               I havereviewed this annual report on Form 40-F/A of Sierra Wireless, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for,the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)             Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date:  April 12.2006

 

 
| /s/  DAVID G. MCLENNAN   |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| David  G. McLennan       |
| Chief  Financial Officer |

 

1

----