alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 270.104 Size and composition of a Team. ( a ) *Size of a Team.* The size of a Team will depend upon the likely scope and complexity of the investigation. A Team may consist of five or less members if the investigation is narrowly focused, or a Team may consist of twenty or more members divided into groups if the breadth of the investigation spans a number of technical issues. In addition, Teams may be supported by others at NIST, in other federal agencies, and in the private sector, who may conduct supporting experiments, analysis, interviews witnesses, and/or examine the response of first responders, occupants, etc.
( b ) *Composition of a Team.* ( 1 ) A Team will be composed of individuals selected by the Director and led by a Lead Investigator designated by the Director.
( 2 ) The Lead Investigator will be a NIST employee, selected based on his/her technical qualifications, ability to mobilize and lead a multi-disciplinary investigative team, and ability to deal with sensitive issues and the media.
( 3 ) Team members will include at least one employee of NIST and will include experts who are not employees of NIST, who may include private sector experts, university experts, representatives of professional organizations with appropriate expertise, and appropriate Federal, State, or local officials.
( 4 ) Team members who are not Federal employees will be Federal Government contractors.
( 5 ) Teams may include members who are experts in one or more of the following disciplines: civil, structural, mechanical, electrical, fire, forensic, safety, architectural, and materials engineering, and specialists in emergency response, human behavior, and evacuation.
( c ) *Duration of a Team.* A Team's term will end 3 months after the Team's final public report is published, but the term may be extended or terminated earlier by the Director.
[68 FR 66704, Nov. 28, 2003, as amended at 69 FR 33571, June 16, 2004]
###### Editorial Note on Part 922

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

#### § 922.197 Effect on affected federally-recognized Indian tribes.

The exercise of treaty fishing rights is not modified, altered, or in any way affected by the regulations promulgated in this Subpart. The Director shall consult with the governing body of each federally-recognized Indian tribe mentioned in the 1836 Treaty of Washington and in subsequent court decisions related to the Treaty regarding any matter which might affect the ability of the Tribe's members to participate in treaty fishing activities in the Sanctuary.

[79 FR 52972, Sept. 5, 2014; 80 FR 12080, Mar. 6, 2015]
### SUBCHAPTER II—DISASTER PREPAREDNESS AND MITIGATION ASSISTANCE
NRC ISSUES SECOND OF THREE TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORTS ON 

DOE’S YUCCA MOUNTAIN LICENSE APPLICATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has published the second of three technical 

evaluation reports (TERs) detailing the agency staff’s review of the Department of Energy’s 

license application for a high-level waste repository at Yucca Mountain in Nevada.

Publication of the report provides the staff’s technical review of the pre-closure 

information in the Yucca Mountain application. This TER does not include findings as to 

whether NRC’s regulatory requirements have been satisfied. 

“Technical Evaluation Report on the Content of the U.S. Department of Energy’s Yucca 

Mountain Repository License Application; Preclosure Volume: Repository Safety Before

Permanent Closure,” is part of the agency’s orderly closeout of the Yucca Mountain license 

review process and is intended as a public record of the staff’s scientific and technical work in 

preparing for and reviewing the application. It was developed using the draft Volume 2 of the 

staff’s Safety Evaluation Report (SER) on the application. 

A TER on postclosure safety, based on what would have been Volume 3 of the SER, was 

issued publicly on July 21. (Volume 1 of the SER was published in August 2010, before the 

licensing review was stopped.) The TERs were prepared as part of the agency’s knowledge 

management activities during the closeout of the Yucca Mountain licensing review. The 

closeout, including publication of the third TER, is expected to be complete by Sept. 30. 

The TER is available on the NRC website’s Yucca Mountain page.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-165 September 1, 2011
### **CHAPTER 143—APPALACHIAN REGIONAL COMMISSION**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION

Sec.
14301.
Establishment, membership, and employees.
14302.
Decisions.
14303.
Functions.
14304.
Recommendations.
14305.
Liaison between Federal Government and Commission.
14306.
Administrative powers and expenses.
14307.
Meetings.
14308.
Information.
14309.
Personal financial interests.
14310.
Annual report.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE

14321.
Grants and other assistance.
14322.
Approval of development plans, strategy statements, and projects.
14323.
Congressional notification.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

Pub. L. 117–58, div. A, title I, §11506(c)(2), Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 584, which directed amendment of the analysis for subchapter II of this chapter by adding item 14323 at the end, was executed by adding item 14323 to the analysis for this chapter to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
§ 1112.35 When must an audit be conducted? ( a ) At a minimum, each third party conformity assessment body must be reassessed at the frequency established by its accreditation body.
( b ) For the examination portion of the audit, which is conducted by the CPSC: ( 1 ) Each third party conformity assessment body must submit a CPSC Form 223 for audit purposes no less than every two years. When a CPSC Form 223 is submitted for audit purposes, the third party conformity assessment body must submit any accompanying documentation that would be required if it were a new application.
( 2 ) Under § 1112.13(a)(1), a third party conformity assessment body must submit a new CPSC Form 223 whenever the information supplied on the form changes. In the event that the third party conformity assessment body submits a new CPSC Form 223 to provide updated information, the third party conformity assessment body may elect to have the new CPSC Form 223 satisfy the requirement of paragraph (b)(1) of this section. If the third party conformity assessment body intends to have the new CPSC Form 223 treated as its submission for audit purposes, the third party conformity assessment body must make that intention clear upon submission, and it must submit any accompanying documentation that would be required if it were a new application.
( 3 ) At least 30 days prior to the date by which a third party conformity assessment body must submit a CPSC Form 223 for audit purposes, the CPSC will notify the body in writing, which may be electronic, of the impending audit deadline. A third party conformity assessment body may request an extension of the deadline for the examination portion of the audit, but it must indicate how much additional time is requested and explain why such an extension is warranted. The CPSC will notify the third party conformity assessment body whether its request for an extension has been granted.
[77 FR 31084, May 24, 2012, as amended at 78 FR 15865, Mar. 12, 2013]
#### Benjamin Feinberg et al., Appellants, v. Louis Feinberg, Respondent.

Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 784.]
§ 23.5 Report to the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. The Department of Commerce will compile and submit a consolidated report to OJJDP, by June 30, 1987, on its experience in implementation of 39 U.S.C. 3220(a) (2), the OJJDP guidelines, and the Department of Commerce's regulation. This report will cover the period from December 24, 1986 through March 31, 1987, and provide detail on: ( a ) The Department of Commerce's experience in implementation (including problems encountered), successful and/or innovative methods adopted to use missing children photographs and information on or in penalty mail, the estimated number of pieces of penalty mail containing such information, and the percentage of total penalty mail directed to the public which included missing children information.
( b ) The estimated total cost to implement the program, with supporting detail, and
( c ) Recommendations for changes in the program to make it more effective.
SERVED: March 21,2016 

. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

AIR MEDICAL RESOURCES GROUP, INC. 

DOCKET NO. FAA-2014-0551 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

ORDER REASSIGNING PROCEEDING 

?-~ t.~. 0 

Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin has transferred to the Food and Drug 

Administration. Accordingly, this proceeding is hereby reassigned from Judge Goodwin to 

Administrative Law Judge Douglas M. Rawald. Any dates set for hearing or prehearing 

conference are suspended until further notice. All other orders remain in full force and effect 

absent further order. 

SO ORDERED. 

Attachment-Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

ONE COPY 

Gregory S. Winton, Respondent's Counsel 

The Aviation Law Firm 

1997 Annapolis Exchange Parkway, Suite 300 

Annapolis, MD 21401 

TEL: 301-294-8550 

FAX: 866-568-9886 

Adam Runkel, Complainant 's Counsel 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Enforcement Division- Western Team 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, W A 98056 

TEL: 425-227-2914 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

Email: adam.runkel@faa.gov 

The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0551 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W 1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AQC-430. 

-2-
§ 1101.34 Reasonable steps to assure information release is “reasonably related to effectuating the purposes of the Acts” the Commission administers. ( a ) The steps set forth below are the steps the Commission has determined are reasonable to take to assure that the disclosure of information to the public effectuates the purposes of the Acts it administers. ( 1 ) *Purposes of the CPSA.* The Commission will review information to determine whether disclosure would be reasonably related to effectuating one or more of the specific purposes of the CPSA, as set forth in sections 2(b) and 5, 15 U.S.C. 2051(b) and 2054.
( 2 ) *Purposes of the FHSA, FFA, PPPA and RSA.* The Commission will also review information concerning products subject to the transferred acts it administers and to the Commission's specific functions under those acts to determine whether disclosure of information would be reasonably related to effectuating the purposes of those acts.
( 3 ) *Purposes of the FOIA.* FOIA requests will be reviewed to determine whether disclosure of the information is reasonably related to effectuating one or more of the purposes of the acts administered by the Commission. In the event of a close question on this issue, the Commission will defer to the purposes of the FOIA. The FOIA establishes a general right of the public to have access to information in the Commission's possession, particularly information that reveals whether the Commission is meeting its statutory responsibilities or information upon which the Commission bases a decision that affects the public health and safety.
( b ) In reviewing proposed information disclosures, the Commission will consider disclosing the material on the basis of whether release of the information, when taken as a whole, was prepared or is maintained in the course of or to support an activity of the Commission designed to accomplish one or more of the statutory purposes.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR
RULE 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, David H. Fleischman, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of TradeStation Group, Inc.; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                 
|-------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|April 29, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ David H. Fleischman                                         
|Date           |  |  |  |     |  | David H. Fleischman                                             
|               |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of Finance and Treasurer
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas** 

June 30, 2021

No. 04

- 20

- 00107

- CV

Douglas HEDRICK and Mark Hedrick, Appellants

v.

JBRF, LLC ; Lonestar Handguns, LLC; Joshua Felker; August C. Golla; and Debra S. Golla, Appellees

From the 45th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial C ourt No. 2016

- CI

- 00267 Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

This case was submitted on briefs on February 9, 2021. On June 28, 2021

, the parties filed a joint motion t o abate this appeal for thirty days to give th e parties time to finalize a

tentative s ettlement agreement

.

The joint motion to abate this appeal is GRANTED. See Transp. Ins. Co. v. Faircloth

, 898 S.W.2d 269, 280 (Tex. 1995) (“ Public policy favors the amicable settlement of

controversies .”).

We ABATE this appeal until July 28 , 202 1

.

We ORDER Appellant s to file in this court not later than July 28, 2021, (1) a motion to dismiss the appeal or (2) a motion to reinstate the appeal on the court’s docket so the appeal may proceed.

It is so ORDERED on June 30, 2021

.



### PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________ Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-11-0102 - Fourth Report on Status of Reactivation of Construction and Licensing for The Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2.

Accession Number: ML111530391

Date Released: Friday, August 12, 2011

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML111530399 - SECY-11-0102 - Fourth Report on Status of Reactivation of Constrcution and Licensing for The Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2. (8 page(s), 7/28/2011)
    - ML11203A006 - SECY-11-0102 - Enclosure 1 - Statistical Status Report - Fourth Report on Status of Reactivation of Construction and Licensing for Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2. (1 page(s), 6/17/2011)
    - ML11203A005 - SECY-11-0102 - Enclosure 2 - Chart of Future Activities - Fourth Report on Status of Reactivation of Construction and Licensing for Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Unit 2. (1 page(s), 7/21/2011)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
### §11842. Evaluation of drug abuse education and prevention efforts

#### (a) Method

The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall develop and conduct a structured evaluation of the different approaches utilized across the Nation to reduce drug abuse.

#### (b) Grants

The Secretary of Health and Human Services may make grants to or enter into contracts with appropriate entities for the purpose of conducting the evaluations required by subsection (a).

#### (c) Time of reports

The Secretary shall submit a report based on the evaluations prepared under subsection (a) not later than 1 year after November 18, 1988, and another report based on such evaluations not later than 3 years after November 18, 1988. A third report based on such evaluations shall be submitted by the Secretary not later than January 1, 1994.

#### (d) Authorization of appropriations

To carry out this section, there are authorized to be appropriated $12,000,000 in fiscal year 1989, and $15,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 1990 through 1993.

(Pub. L. 100–690, title III, §3522, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4260; Pub. L. 101–93, §4(2), Aug. 16, 1989, 103 Stat. 611; Pub. L. 101–204, title X, §1001(c)(1), Dec. 7, 1989, 103 Stat. 1826.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1989—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 101–93 and Pub. L. 101–204, §1001(c)(1)(A)(ii), made identical amendments, striking out "(as defined in section 11851(6) of this title)" after "drug abuse".

Pub. L. 101–204, §1001(c)(1)(A)(i), struck out ", acting through the Administrator," before "shall develop".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 101–204, §1001(c)(1)(B), substituted "Secretary of Health and Human Services" for "Administrator".
#### § 930.44 Availability of mediation for disputes concerning proposed activities.

In the event of a serious disagreement between a Federal agency and a State agency regarding the consistency of a proposed federal activity affecting any coastal use or resource, either party may request the Secretarial mediation or OCRM mediation services provided for in subpart G.
§ 1236.1 Scope. This part establishes a consumer product safety standard for infant sleep products, including inclined and flat sleep surfaces, that applies to all products marketed or intended to provide a sleeping accommodation for an infant up to 5 months of age, and that are not already subject to any of the following standards: ( a ) 16 CFR part 1218 Safety Standard for Bassinets and Cradles;
( b ) 16 CFR part 1219 Safety Standard for Full-Size Baby Cribs;
( c ) 16 CFR part 1220 Safety Standard for Non-Full-Size Baby Cribs;
( d ) 16 CFR part 1221 Safety Standard for Play Yards;
( e ) 16 CFR part 1222 Safety Standard for Bedside Sleepers.
§ 846.725 Appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board. ( a ) A person whose rights or interests under this part are affected by an agency decision that an employee is not eligible to elect FERS coverage or an agency refusal to accept a belated election under § 846.724, or an OPM decision denying an extension or waiver under § 846.722, may request the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) to review such decision in accord with procedures prescribed by MSPB. MSPB regulations relating to appeals are contained in chapter II of this title.
( b ) Paragraph (a) of this section is the exclusive remedy for review of agency decisions concerning eligibility to make an election under this subpart. An agency decision must not allow review under any employee grievance procedures, including those established by chapter 71 of title 5, United States Code, and 5 CFR part 771.
### Part B—Miscellaneous
§ 843.101 Purpose. ( a ) This part regulates death benefits and employee refunds under FERS.
( b ) This subpart contains definitions and regulations that have general application throughout this part.
| **General (Narrative) (Details)**                                    | Jun. 30, 2013 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|
| Percentage owned of outstanding common stock by majority shareholder | 90.00%        |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Percentage owned of outstanding common stock by majority shareholder
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**cna_PercentageOwnedOfOutstandingCommonStockByMajorityShareholder**Namespace Prefix:**cna_**Data Type:**num:percentItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**instant |
### [§§1560, 1561. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–66, div. A, title V, §563(c)(1), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 768]

Section 1560, Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1139, §560; Pub. L. 87–138, §1, Aug. 14, 1961, 75 Stat. 338; Pub. L. 88–77, §5(1), July 25, 1963, 77 Stat. 95; Pub. L. 88–651, Oct. 13, 1964, 78 Stat. 1078; Pub. L. 89–311, §4, Oct. 31, 1965, 79 Stat. 1156; Pub. L. 91–24, §5, June 11, 1969, 83 Stat. 33; Pub. L. 94–169, title I, §106(41), Dec. 23, 1975, 89 Stat. 1019; renumbered §1560 and amended Pub. L. 102–83, §§4(b)(4)(A), 5(a), (c)(1), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 405, 406; Pub. L. 107–296, title XVII, §1704(d), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2315, related to persons eligible for Medal of Honor Roll.

Section 1561, Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1139, §561; Pub. L. 87–138, §2(a), Aug. 14, 1961, 75 Stat. 338; Pub. L. 88–77, §5(2), July 25, 1963, 77 Stat. 95; Pub. L. 94–169, title I, §106(42), (43), Dec. 23, 1975, 89 Stat. 1019; renumbered §1561 and amended Pub. L. 102–83, §§4(b)(1), (2)(E), 5(a), (c)(1), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 404–406, related to certificates issued to persons on the Medal of Honor Roll.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable with respect to Medals of Honor awarded on or after Dec. 26, 2013, see section 563(d) of Pub. L. 113–66, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1134a of Title 10, Armed Forces.
EXHIBIT 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-166058 on Form S-3 and Registration Statements No. 333-166360 and 333-129538 on Form S-8 of our report dated February 20, 2013, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of CNA Financial Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”), and the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2012 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph concerning a change in accounting for costs associated with acquiring or renewing insurance contracts in 2012).


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Chicago, Illinois


February 20, 2013