alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa.

www.nrc.gov

 

No. I-07-008 March 20, 2007

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

 NUCLEAR GAUGE REPORTED STOLEN IN PHILADELPHIA;

 RECOVERY OF DEVICE IS SOUGHT

Authorities are seeking the return of a portable nuclear gauge that was stolen from a worksite in

the City of Philadelphia on Monday, March 19. The gauge, containing small amounts of radioactive

material, is used for industrial purposes such as measuring the density of soil at construction sites.

Anyone with information regarding the device is asked to contact the Nuclear Regulatory

Commission’s Headquarters Operations Center at (301) 816-5100. Collect calls will be accepted. The

center is staffed 24 hours a day.

Underwood Engineering, of Belmar, N.J., reported the gauge and its bright-yellow

transportation case were stolen from a truck parked at a construction worksite at Audenreid High

School Replacement Project at 3301 Tasker St., Phila. The theft occurred between 2:30 and 4:30 p.m.

on March 19. It was noticed that the gauge, which had been locked in the bed of the vehicle, was

missing at the end of the workday.

The Philadelphia Police Department was notified of the incident and responded to the area. 

Underwood Engineering is offering a reward for the return of the gauge.

The gauge holds small quantities of cesium-137 and americium-241. It consists of a shielding

container with a plunger-type handle protruding from the top to be used to extend and then retract the

radioactive source from the shielded position. When not in use, the handle is normally locked, with the

source in the retracted, safely shielded position.

As long as the source is in the shielded position, the gauge does not present a hazard to the

public. However, any attempt to tamper with the source would subject the person doing so to potential

radiation exposure. Handling of an unshielded source outside of the container would carry a risk of

potentially dangerous exposure.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 ###

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. 

E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

A typical moisture density gauge in use

A typical carrying case for a moisture density gauge
§ 791.108 Second interagency consultation. ( a ) Upon receipt of any submission by a party to an ICTS Transaction under § 791.107, the Secretary shall consider whether and how any information provided—including proposed mitigation measures—affects an initial determination of whether the ICTS Transaction meets the criteria set forth in § 791.103(c).
( b ) After considering the effect of any submission by a party to an ICTS Transaction under § 791.107 consistent with paragraph (a) of this section, the Secretary shall consult with and seek the consensus of all appropriate agency heads prior to issuing a final determination as to whether the ICTS Transaction shall be prohibited, not prohibited, or permitted pursuant to the adoption of negotiated mitigation measures.
( c ) If consensus is unable to be reached, the Secretary shall notify the President of the Secretary's proposed final determination and any appropriate agency head's opposition thereto.
( d ) After receiving direction from the President regarding the Secretary's proposed final determination and any appropriate agency head's opposition thereto, the Secretary shall issue a final determination pursuant to § 791.109.
[86 FR 4923, Jan. 19, 2021. Redesignated and amended at 89 FR 58265, July 18, 2024]
NRC FORM 536

(01-16-2024)

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

OPERATOR LICENSING 

EXAMINATION DATA

APPROVED BY OMB: NO. 3150-0131 EXPIRES: 01/31/2027 

Estimated burden per response to comply with this voluntary information collection request: 45 minutes. 

This information collection is used to plan budgets and resources for operator examinations. Send 

comments regarding burden estimate to the FOIA, Library, and Information Collections Branch (T-6 

A10M), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, or by email to 

Infocollects.Resource@nrc.gov, and the OMB reviewer at: OMB Office of Information and Regulatory 

Affairs, (3150-0131), Attn: Desk Officer for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 725 17th Street NW, 

Washington, DC 20503; email: oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. The NRC may not conduct or 

sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the document 

requesting or requiring the collection displays a currently valid OMB control number.

FACILITY NRC REGION

A. PROPOSED EXAMINATION PREPARATION SCHEDULE

PROPOSED NUMBER

ESTIMATED NUMBER OF 

LICENSEE-PREPARED 

EXAMINATIONS

ESTIMATED NUMBER OF 

NRC-PREPARED 

EXAMINATIONS

B. INITIAL OPERATOR LICENSE EXAMINATIONS

PROPOSED NUMBER CY 

NUMBER OF REACTOR 

OPERATORS

NUMBER OF SENIOR REACTOR 

OPERATORS - INSTANT

NUMBER OF SENIOR REACTOR 

OPERATORS - UPGRADE

NUMBER OF SENIOR REACTOR 

OPERATORS - LIMITED

PROPOSED DATES

PRIMARY DATE

ALTERNATE DATE

CY CY CY 

CY CY CY CY 

NRC FORM 536 (01-16-2024)
Docket Number FAA-2014-0123

 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response 

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 2/27/13 ---

Regional Airline Association 2/27/13 ---

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 2/27/13 ---

ATA M Lopez 2/27/13 ---
#### In the Matter of Greystone Holding Corporation, Appellant, against Joseph J. Lennox, as Commissioner of Assessment and Taxation of the Tax District Comprised of the City of Yonkers, et al., Respondents.

Ho opinion. Present Holán, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and MaeCrate, JJ. [197 Mise. 463.]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-10666 

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RIGOBERTO RUIZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:99-CR-147-2-Y

--------------------

May 4, 2001

Before DAVIS, JONES and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel representing Rigoberto Ruiz has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ruiz was

provided with a copy of counsel’s Anders motion and brief. Ruiz

has filed a response challenging the constitutionality of his

stop, search, arrest, detention, interrogation, and cooperation

with the authorities; challenging the sufficiency of the

evidence; alleging misconduct by law enforcement officers and

prosecutors; and alleging that he received ineffective assistance
No. 00-10666 

-2-

from his trial counsel. Ruiz asks this court to deny counsel’s

Anders motion and to appoint new appellate counsel or permit him

to proceed pro se. 

The record has not been adequately developed for us to

consider Ruiz’s ineffective assistance arguments in this direct

appeal. See United States v. Higdon, 832 F.2d 312, 314 (5th Cir.

1987). With respect to Ruiz’s remaining claims, our independent

review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Ruiz’s response shows

that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Consequently,

Ruiz’s motion to substitute counsel or, alternatively, for leave

to proceed pro se is DENIED AS MOOT, counsel’s motion for leave

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th

Cir. R. 42.2.
**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**AND
      PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**




In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
      Mortgagebrokers.com Holdings, Inc. for the Quarter Ending June 30, 2007, I,
      Alex
      Haditaghi, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
      Mortgagebrokers.com Holdings, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      to
      the best of my knowledge and belief, that:




1.
        Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period
      ending June 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
        The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
      for the period ended June 30, 2007, fairly represents in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of Mortgagebrokers.com
      Holdings, Inc.




Dated:
                August 14, 2007





**MORTGAGEBROKERS.COM
      HOLDINGS, INC.**





By:
            */s/****Alex
                Haditaghi*
              Alex
                Haditaghi
              Chief Executive
                Officer,
              Chief
                Financial Officer and
              Principal
                Accounting Officer
§ 930.208 Administrative Law Judge Loan Program—detail to other agencies. ( a ) In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 3344, OPM administers an Administrative Law Judge Loan Program that coordinates the loan/detail of an administrative law judge from one agency to another. An agency may request from OPM the services of an administrative law judge if the agency is occasionally or temporarily insufficiently staffed with administrative law judges, or an agency may loan the services of its administrative law judges to other agencies if there is insufficient work to fully occupy the administrative law judges' work schedule.
( b ) An agency's request to OPM for the services of an administrative law judge must: ( 1 ) Identify and briefly describe the nature of the cases(s) to be heard;
( 2 ) Specify the legal authority for which the use of an administrative law judge is required; and
( 3 ) Demonstrate, as appropriate, that the agency has no administrative law judge available to hear the case(s).
( c ) The services of an administrative law judge under this program are made from the starting date of the detail until the end of the current fiscal year, but may be extended into the next fiscal year with OPM's approval. Decisions for an extension are made by OPM on a case-by-case basis.
( d ) The agency requesting the services of an administrative law judge under this program is responsible for reimbursing the agency that employs the administrative law judge for the cost of the service.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 24, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68435-68436]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26016]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster <greek-i> 10001]


State of Maryland

    Allegany County and the contiguous counties of Garrett and 
Washington in the State of Maryland; Bedford, Fulton,

[[Page 68436]]

and Somerset Counties in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; and 
Hampshire, Mineral, and Morgan Counties in the State of West Virginia 
constitute a disaster area as a result of heavy rains caused by the 
remnants of Hurricane Frances and Hurricane Ivan that occurred on 
September 6, 2004. Applications for loans for physical damage as a 
result of the disaster may be filed until the close of business on 
January 18, 2005, and for economic injury until the close of business 
on August 16, 2005, at the address listed below or other locally 
announced locations: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 
1 Office, 360 Rainbow Blvd., South 3rd Floor, Niagara Falls, NY 14303.
    The interest rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners with credit available elsewhere.................      6.375
  Homeowners without credit available elsewhere..............      3.187
  Businesses with credit available elsewhere.................      5.800
  Businesses and non-profit organizations without credit           2.900
   available elsewhere.......................................
  Others (including non-profit organizations) with credit          4.875
   available elsewhere.......................................
For Economic Injury:
  Businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without           2.900
   credit available elsewhere................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 10001 
for Maryland, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia. The number assigned to 
this disaster for economic injury is 10002 for Maryland, Pennsylvania, 
and West Virginia.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008.)

    Dated: November 16, 2004.
Hector V. Barreto,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 04-26016 Filed 11-23-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
### §8302. Necessity for coordination in the development of the Washington metropolitan region

Because the District of Columbia is the seat of the Federal Government and has become the urban center of a rapidly expanding Washington metropolitan region, the necessity for the continued and effective performance of the functions of the Government in the District of Columbia, the general welfare of the District of Columbia, the health and living standards of the people residing or working in the District of Columbia, and the conduct of industry, trade, and commerce in the District of Columbia require that to the fullest extent possible the development of the District of Columbia and the management of its public affairs, and the activities of the departments, agencies, and instrumentalities of the Government which may be carried out in, or in relation to, the other areas of the Washington metropolitan region, shall be coordinated with the development of those other areas and with the management of their public affairs so that, with the cooperation and assistance of those other areas, all of the areas in the Washington metropolitan area shall be developed and their public affairs shall be managed so as to contribute effectively toward the solution of the community development problems of the Washington metropolitan region on a unified metropolitan basis.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1210.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8302 | 40:131. | Pub. L. 86–527, §2, June 27, 1960, 74 Stat. 223. |

Section

The words "The Congress hereby declares that" are omitted as obsolete. The words "at the seat of said Government" are omitted as unnecessary.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 24, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 68408]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26053]



[[Page 68408]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD


Agency Recordkeeping/Reporting Requirements Under Review by the 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB)

    The National Transportation Safety Board intends to submit the 
following (see below) public information collection request (ICR) to 
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance 
under the paperwork reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35). OMB approval is being requested concurrently with this 
submission. A copy of this individual ICR, with applicable supporting 
documentation, may be obtained by calling the National Transportation 
Safety Board Departmental Clearance Officer, Deborah Bruce (202) 314-
6511. Comments and questions about the ICR listed below should be 
directed to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OMB 
Desk Officer for the National Transportation Safety Board, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10102, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20503.
    Agency: National Transportation Safety Board.
    Title: Pilot/Operator Aircraft Accident/Incident Report.
    OMB Number: 3147-0001.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Affected Public: Individuals, businesses (for and not for profit), 
Governments (State, local, and Tribal).
    Number of Respondents: 2,100.
    Estimated time per respondent: 60 minutes.
    Total Burden Hours: 2,100.
    Description: The National Transportation Safety Board is required 
to investigate aviation accidents and certain incidents as stated in 
the 49 Code of Federal Regulations Part 830. Entities having a 
reportable accident/incident are required to report the details 
pertaining to the event to the Safety Board. To ensure pertinent data 
is collected, the Board uses a standard form for reporting the 
accident/incident.
    The National Transportation Safety Board is seeking clearance to 
use the Pilot/Operator Aircraft Accident/Incident Report to help 
determine the facts, conditions, and circumstances of aviation 
accidents/incidents in order to facilitate prevention strategies and 
maintain statistics on aviation safety.

    Dated: November 18, 2004.
Vicky D'Onofrio,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-26053 Filed 11-23-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7533-01-M
SINGLE INSTALLMENT NOTE

In consideration of value received, We, the undersigned UNICO INCORPORATED,
Arizona (borrower), agrees to pay RAY C. BROWN (Lender) the amount of ONE-
HUNDRED-THOUSAND & XX/100 DOLLARS ($100,000), on which such amount interest
shall accrue at the rate of 10% percent per year.

The entire amount, principal and interest, shall be due and payable on or
before APRIL 18, 2005.  The borrower may repay this loan without any early
payment penalty.

Failure to make a payment when due shall be considered a default on this note.
Should such a default exist for more than a grace period of THIRTY (30) days,
Borrower agrees to pay Lender all reasonable costs and expenses incurred
during collection proceedings, including, but not limited to, attorney fees.



UNICO INCORPORATED, ARIZONA (Borrower)

    /s/ Ray C. Brown                         4/19/03
By: __________________________________      __________________
RAY C. BROWN, Chief Executive Officer       Date


    /s/ David F. Poisson                     4/22/03
______________________________________      __________________
SECRETARY UNICO, INC.                       Date


    /s/ Ray C. Brown                         4/19/03
______________________________________      ___________________
RAY C. BROWN (Lender)                       Date
Energy East Exhibit 10-32 2007 2nd Qtr 10-Q



Exhibit 10-32



 

AMENDMENT NO. 4

TO THE 

ENERGY EAST CORPORATION

SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN

EFFECTIVE AS OF

AUGUST 1, 2001



WHEREAS, Energy East Corporation (the "Company") established the Energy East Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the "Plan"), effective as of August 1, 2001; and 


WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan, as permitted by Section 7 of the Plan, to permit a limited timing of payment election.


        NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended, effective as of August 1, 2007 as follows:



1.   Paragraph 6C of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following subparagraph to the end of Paragraph 6C:


"If Wesley von Schack so elects on or prior to 12/31/07, then, notwithstanding anything else contained herein, he will receive the retirement benefit described in Paragraph 6, as actuarially determined pursuant to his Employment Agreement (dated December 31, 2006), in a single lump sum upon the earlier of (i) the date of the consummation of a transaction which is a "change in the ownership or effective control of the Corporation or in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets of the Corporation" (as such term is defined in Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A) or (ii) the date payment would be made as a result of his termination of employment with the Corporation and it affiliates in accordance with the termination of employment provisions in Paragraph 6."







All the provisions of the Plan not specifically mentioned in this Amendment No. 4 shall be considered modified to the extent necessary to be consistent with the changes made in this Amendment No. 4.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF OF THE ADOPTION OF THIS AMENDMENT NO. 4, Energy East Corporation has set its hand and seal to this Amendment No. 4 as of the 31st day of July, 2007.



	 	
ENERGY EAST CORPORATION



	 	 
	
Witness: /s/Michelle Taylor                            
	
By: /s/R.R. Benson                                                

	 	
      Its:
§ 971.409 Denial of issuance or transfer. ( a ) The Administrator may deny issuance or transfer of a permit if he finds that the applicant or the proposed commercial recovery activities do not meet the rquirements of this part for the issuance or transfer of a permit.
( b ) When the Administrator proposes to deny issuance or transfer, he will send to the applicant, via certified mail, return receipt requested, and publish in the Federal Register, written notice of his intention to deny issuance or transfer. The notice will include: ( 1 ) The basis upon which the Administrator proposes to deny issuance or transfer; and
( 2 ) If the basis for the proposed denial is a deficiency which the Administrator believes the applicant can correct: ( i ) The action believed necessary to correct the deficiency; and
( ii ) The time within which any correctable deficiency must be corrected (not to exceed 180 days except as specified by the Administrator for good cause).
( c ) The Administrator will deny issuance or transfer: ( 1 ) On the 30th day after the date the notice is received by the applicant under paragraph (b) of this section, unless before the 30th day the applicant files with the Administrator a written request for an administrative review of the proposed denial; or
( 2 ) On the last day of the period established under paragraph (b)(2)(ii) in which the applicant must correct a deficiency, if the deficiency has not been corrected before that day and an administrative review requested pursuant to paragraph (c)(1) is not pending or in progress.
( d ) If a timely request for administrative review of the proposed denial is made by the applicant under paragraph (c)(1) of this section, the Administrator will promptly begin a formal hearing in accordance with subpart I. If the proposed denial is the result of a correctable deficiency, the administrative review will proceed concurrently with any attempt to correct the deficiency, unless the parties agree otherwise or the administrative law judge orders differently.
( e ) If the Administrator denies issuance or transfer, the Administrator will send to the applicant written notice of final denial, including the reasons therefor.
( f ) Any final determination by the Administrator granting or denying issuance or transfer of a permit is subject to judicial review as provided in chapter 7 of title 5, United States Code.
### SUBCHAPTER XX—CONFRONTING USE OF METHAMPHETAMINE