alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No: III-13-031 August 1, 2013

CONTACT: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663

NRC Schedules Public Meeting Aug. 8 to Discuss 

Performance of Braidwood Nuclear Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a public meeting Aug. 8 to discuss the agency’s 

annual safety assessment of the Braidwood nuclear power plant. The two-unit plant, operated by Exelon 

Generation Company, LLC, is located in Braceville, Ill., about 20 miles southwest of Joliet.

The public meeting will be held at 6 p.m. at the Braidwood City Hall, 141 W. Main St., in 

Braidwood. The NRC staff will present the results of the plant’s 2012 annual assessment, talk about the 

NRC and its range of activities and be available to respond to questions and comments from the public. 

“When the NRC evaluates Braidwood’s performance for the previous year, we take a look at any 

and all issues that might be of concern,” said Region III Administrator Charles Casto. “Then we map out 

our inspection plans for that specific facility, issue inspection reports, and hold public meetings near the 

plant in order to discuss our oversight and answer questions from local residents.”

The annual assessment letter sent from the NRC Region III office to plant officials addresses the 

performance of the plant during 2012 and will serve as the basis for the discussion.

The NRC review concluded that Braidwood Units 1 and 2 operated safely in 2012.

The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess nuclear 

plant performance. The colors start with green and then increase to white, yellow, or red, commensurate 

with the safety significance of the issues involved. Performance indicators are statistical measurements 

of plant and equipment performance. 

All performance indicators and inspection findings for Unit 1 during 2012 were determined to be 

green.

All inspection findings for Unit 2 were green. There was one white performance indicator in the 

area of mitigating systems during the second quarter of the year which returned to green during the third
Page | 2

quarter. Mitigating systems are key pieces of equipment and specific systems that must be available and 

reliable when needed.

As a result of this overall performance, Braidwood will receive the NRC’s normal level of 

oversight during 2013.

Routine inspections are performed by two NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant and by 

inspection specialists from the Region III Office in Lisle, Ill., and the agency’s headquarters in Rockville, 

Md. Among the areas of plant operations being inspected this year are independent spent fuel installation, 

radiation protection and license renewal.

The most current performance information for Braidwood Unit 1 and Unit 2 is available on the

NRC's website.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

128549 & (18) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 128549 

 COA: 258589 

Kalkaska CC: 01-002086-FH 

JODIE JAMES LOWERY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 7, 2005 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The 

miscellaneous motion is DENIED. 

p1024 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2005 

Clerk
### Part A–1—Certain Industrial Equipment

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This part was, in the original, designated part C and has been changed to part A–1 for purposes of codification.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eric Boyer, Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 544]

Motion for reargument denied. Present — Pigott, Jr., PJ., Hurlbutt, Scudder and Green, JJ.
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009
as filed with the SEC on the date hereof, I, Eva Chen, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 29, 2010



By:

/s/ Eva ChenName:

Eva ChenTitle:

Chief Financial Officer




|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the company and will be retained by the
company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### In the Matter of Edward F. Mitchell, an Attorney, Respondent. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner.

[820 NYS2d 816]

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1999. He maintained an office for the practice of law in New Jersey where he was admitted in 1998.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey, by order dated September 20, 2005, temporarily suspended respondent from the practice of law until further order of that court. The order was based on a petition by the New Jersey Office of Attorney Ethics submitting clear evidence that respondent had neglected client matters, made apparent thefts from two clients, failed to explain a trust account overdraft, and failed to communicate with clients, the courts, or the Office of Attorney Ethics since the summer of 2005.

We grant petitioner’s motion for an order imposing reciprocal discipline pursuant to this Court’s rules *(see*22 NYCRR 806.19; *see e.g. Matter of Carney,*263 AD2d 670 [1999]). Respondent has not replied to or otherwise appeared upon the motion, which petitioner served on respondent at two of his last known addresses by certified and regular mail. We further determine that the interests of justice will be served by suspending respondent from practice indefinitely and until further order of this Court.

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that petitioner’s motion is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately, and until further order of this Court; and it is further ordered that, while so suspended, respondent is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; he is forbidden to appear as an attorney or *1106counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give to another any opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further ordered that respondent shall comply with the provisions of this Court’s rules regulating the conduct of suspended attorneys *(see*22 NYCRR 806.9).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN RE: SIX BALLOTS IN THE 2024 

GENERAL PRIMARY ELECTION

PETITION OF: JAMIE WALSH

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 333 MAL 2024

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth 

Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of July, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
exv10w13xcy



 





			
	CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED
	 	EXHIBIT 10.13(c) REDACTED






AMENDMENT TWO




TO THE




BILLING SERVICES AND LICENSE AGREEMENT




BETWEEN




VERISIGN, INC.




AND




RURAL CELLULAR CORPORATION




     THIS AMENDMENT TWO by and between VeriSign, Inc. (“VeriSign”) and Rural Cellular Corporation
(“Customer”) is made and entered into to be effective the date of the last signature hereto.



W I T N E S S E T H:




     WHEREAS, VeriSign and the Customer are parties to that certain Billing Services and License
Agreement, dated to be effective July 21, 2005 as amended by Amendment One dated to be effective
June 20, 2006, (hereinafter referred to as “Agreement”); and



     WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend the Agreement as provided herein;



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the covenants and undertakings set forth
herein, VeriSign and Customer agree as follows:




	1.	 	The first sentence of Section 3.B is replaced in its entirety with the
following:
	 
	 	 	***






	2.	 	Except as hereby modified, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect
in all aspects throughout the remainder of the term thereof.





*** Information omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to a request for confidential treatment.



 





					
	License Agreement – Amendment Two
	 	Page 1
	 	VeriSign Proprietary






 









 






     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has made and caused this Amendment Two to
be duly executed for it on its behalf by its authorized representative, to be effective the date of
the last signature hereto.



     The parties acknowledge and agree that this Amendment Two constitutes the entire understanding
and agreement between VeriSign and Customer with respect to the subject matter hereof, and
supersedes any and all prior or contemporaneous oral or written representation, understanding,
agreement or communication relating thereto.



     The signatories to this Amendment Two hereby warrant and represent that they have the
authority to execute this Amendment Two on behalf of the entity or entities for which they sign.



     This Amendment Two does not bind or obligate either party in any manner unless duly executed
by an authorized representative.



	 	 	 
	VERISIGN, INC.

	 	RURAL CELLULAR CORPORATION
	 
	 	 
	By: /s/ Thomas L. Dean

	 	By: /s/ W. A. Wilkinson, Jr.
	 
	 	 
	Name: Thomas L. Dean

	 	Name: W. A. Wilkinson, Jr.
	 
	 	 
	Title: VP – VCS Business Ops

	 	Title: VP BSS
	 
	 	 
	Date: 10-5-06

	 	Date: 10-2-06






*** Information omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to a request for confidential treatment.



 





					
	License Agreement – Amendment Two
	 	Page 2
	 	VeriSign Proprietary
§ 990.65 Opening an account for recovered damages. ( a ) *General.* Sums recovered by trustees in satisfaction of a natural resource damage claim must be placed in a revolving trust account. Sums recovered for past assessment costs and emergency restoration costs may be used to reimburse the trustees. All other sums must be used to implement the Final Restoration Plan or all or an appropriate component of a Regional Restoration Plan or an existing restoration project.
( b ) *Joint trustee recoveries* — ( 1 ) *General.* Trustees may establish a joint account for damages recovered pursuant to joint assessment activities, such as an account under the registry of the applicable federal court.
( 2 ) *Management.* Trustees may develop enforceable agreements to govern management of joint accounts, including agreed-upon criteria and procedures, and personnel for authorizing expenditures out of such joint accounts.
( c ) *Interest-bearing accounts.* Trustees may place recoveries in interest-bearing revolving trust accounts, as provided by section 1006(f) of OPA (33 U.S.C. 2706(f)). Interest earned on such accounts may only be used for restoration.
( d ) *Escrow accounts.* Trustees may establish escrow accounts or other investment accounts.
( e ) *Records.* Trustees must maintain appropriate accounting and reporting procedures to document expenditures from accounts established under this section.
( f ) *Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund.* Any sums remaining in an account established under this section that are not used either to reimburse trustees for past assessment and emergency restoration costs or to implement restoration must be deposited in the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund, as provided by section 1006(f) of OPA (33 U.S.C. 2706(f)).
### Part B—Rural STEM Education Research
### §112. Removal of revenue officers from port during epidemic

Whenever, by the prevalence of any contagious or epidemic disease in or near the place by law established as the port of entry for any collection district, it becomes dangerous or inconvenient for the officers of the revenue employed therein to continue the discharge of their respective offices at such port, the Secretary of the Treasury, or, in his absence, the Undersecretary of the Treasury, may direct the removal of the officers of the revenue from such port to any other more convenient place, within, or as near as may be to, such collection district. And at such place such officers may exercise the same powers, and shall be liable to the same duties, according to existing circumstances, as in the port or district established by law. Public notice of any such removal shall be given as soon as may be.

(R.S. §4797; July 31, 1894, ch. 174, §4, 28 Stat. 205; June 10, 1921, ch. 18, §301, 42 Stat. 23; Feb. 17, 1922, ch. 55, 42 Stat. 366.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. 4797 derived from act Feb. 23, 1799, ch. 12, §4, 1 Stat. 620.

Acts July 31, 1894, and June 10, 1921, abolished offices of First Comptroller and Comptroller of the Treasury.

"Undersecretary of the Treasury" was substituted in text for "the First Comptroller" on authority of act Feb. 17, 1922.
**GAO-03-328**                      Published: Feb 19, 2003. Publicly Released: Mar 21, 2003.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Status of FY22 Projects 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

The Congress has been seeking to increase federal agency purchases of equipment and services on line. The General Services Administration's (GSA) Advantage Internet-based ordering system is meant for conducting market research and ordering all types of products and services on line. About $84 million has already been invested in this endeavor. GAO was asked to assess how effectively GSA has managed this investment.

## Recommendations

## Recommendations for Executive Action

## Full Report

Highlights

Full Report (13 pages)

Accessible Text 

## GAO Contacts

### 

William T. Woods
woodsw@gao.gov

(202) 512-4841

## Office of Public Affairs

### Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

### Public Inquiries

Public Affairs
PublicAffairs@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

Government Operations

Federal procurementSystems designInternetStrategic planningProcurementFederal agenciesInformation technologyWarehouse facilitiesIntellectual property rightsGovernment reform
No: 14-033 May 19, 2014

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

NRC, FERC Commissioners to Discuss Grid Reliability,

Reactor Issues May 28 in Rockville, Md

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) 

will hold a joint meeting Wednesday, May 28, at NRC headquarters in Rockville, Md.

The meeting will begin at 9 a.m. and end at approximately 10:30 a.m., followed by a closed 

meeting. The meeting will be in the Commission Conference Room in One White Flint North, 11555 

Rockville Pike in Rockville. Staff members from both agencies and the North American Electric 

Reliability Corporation will brief NRC and FERC Commissioners on topics including grid reliability, 

nuclear power plant license renewals and dam safety.

The NRC is providing a webcast of the joint meeting. Those attending in person should plan to 

arrive at the NRC at least a half-hour in advance of the meeting. The NRC offices are located across the 

street from the White Flint Metro station. Parking is available at the White Flint metro parking garage 

on Marinelli Road.
Underground Piping and Tank Integrity Initiative

Update

Mark Richter

Senior Project Manager-NEI

USNRC/Industry Public Meeting: Underground Piping and Tanks Initiative Update

June 11, 2014 • Rockville, MD
Overview

• UPTI Initiative Update

• Initiative Implementation Status 
UPTI Initiative Update

• No revisions since Revision 3 was issued May, 2013.

• NEI issued letter in May, 2014 reinforcing the 

requirement that stations enter operating 

experience into INPO’s ICES database. 

- The ICES database has been revised to facilitate entry of 

operating experience for underground tanks. 

- The entry of operating experience for underground 

tanks is retroactive to January 1, 2012.
Implementation Status
Implementation Status

• Plants have completed the first eight milestones. 

• Positive trends are indicated on each milestone.

• Milestones complete by December 31, 2014.

• Plants in the “at risk” category reflect that the 

initiative is not applicable to plants that have 

permanently ceased operations.

• The Asset Management Plans capture future 

inspections and related activities.
#### Norman Hertz et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Hertz, Wolf & Kline, Respondents, v. 93 Prince Street Corporation, Appellant.

Present — Glennon, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 41795

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

RENE RAMOS,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 831

Filed: November 26, 2014

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED 

OPINION AND SHALL NOT 

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Jerome County. Hon. John K. Butler, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of five years, with a minimum 

period of confinement of two, for battery on a peace officer, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Reed P. Anderson, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen, Deputy 

Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Rene Ramos pled guilty to battery on a peace officer. Idaho Code § 18-915(3). The 

district court sentenced Ramos to a unified term of five years, with a minimum period of 

confinement of two. Ramos appeals asserting that the district court abused its discretion by 

imposing an excessive sentence.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 
2

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Ramos’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
### §8161. Reservation of parking spaces for Members of Congress

The Council of the District of Columbia shall designate, reserve, and properly mark appropriate and sufficient parking spaces on the streets adjacent to all public buildings in the District for the use of Members of Congress engaged in public business.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1209.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8161 | 40:60a. | June 29, 1956, ch. 479 (3d par. under heading "Department of Vehicles and Traffic"), 70 Stat. 447. |

Section

The words "On and after June 29, 1956" are omitted as obsolete. The words "Council of the District of Columbia" are substituted for ["]Commissioners" [meaning the Board of Commissioners of the District of Columbia] [subsequently changed to "District of Columbia Council" because of section 402(300) of Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1967 (eff. Nov. 3, 1967, 81 Stat. 969)] because of sections 401 and 404(a) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (Public Law 93–198, 87 Stat. 785, 787).