alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1:

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of VSB Bancorp, Inc.,
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Merton
Corn, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Raffaele Branca, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ MERTON CORN
-------------------------------
Merton Corn
Chief Executive Officer
June 19, 2003


/s/ RAFFAELE M. BRANCA
-------------------------------
Raffaele M. Branca
Chief Financial Officer
June 19, 2003

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       22
### SUBCHAPTER II—ATTORNEY GENERAL GUIDELINES
Exhibit
32.2

Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350
by Principal Accounting Officer

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of VSB Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald
Giampaolo, Vice President, Controller and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                   |                                                             
|------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 12, 2009 |                                                             
|                  
|                   | /s/ Ronald Giampaolo                                        
|                   |                                                             
|                   | Ronald Giampaolo                                            
|                   | Vice President, Controller
 and Principal Accounting Officer

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

29

---
No. III-12-013

Contacts: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663

April 17, 2013 

E-Mail: opa3@nrc.gov 

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

NRC MONITORS UNUSUAL EVENT AT LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III staff is monitoring the LaSalle 

nuclear power plant after a lightning strike knocked out offsite power to both Units 1 and 2. The 

NRC has mobilized its Incident Response Center in Region III located in Lisle, Ill., and is 

monitoring the events along with the resident inspector onsite.

 LaSalle declared an Unusual Event around 3:11 p.m. CST after external power was lost 

to the two Mark II boiling water reactors. The plants automatically shut down and all control 

rods were inserted. The plant’s diesel generators are currently supplying power to plant 

equipment. An Unusual Event is the lowest levels of the NRC’s four level emergency 

classification system.

The two-unit site is operated by Exelon Generation Co., and is located in Marseilles, Ill., 

roughly 11 miles southeast of Ottawa.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region III

2443 Warrenville Road Suite 210

Lisle, IL 60532

Web site: www.nrc.gov
Appendix C - Inventory Summary - NRC FY 2013

Page 1 of 2 -

Obligations

% Total 

Obligations

Fixed 

Price Cost T&M/LH Other Competed

Not 

Competed

Not 

Available 

for Comp. blank Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

R710 SUPPORT - MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL $3,614,200.00 2.4% 69.3% 0.0% 30.7% 0.0% 96.3% 0.0% 3.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.7% 65.5%

Biggest Percentage of Obligations

D399

IT AND TELECOM- OTHER IT AND 

TELECOMMUNICATIONS $91,748,044.15 59.9% 63.7% 0.0% 36.3% 0.0% 96.9% 0.3% 1.7% 0.0% 0.3% 0.1% 9.0% 40.3%

R499 SUPPORT- PROFESSIONAL: OTHER $13,268,002.94 8.7% 3.9% 86.0% 10.1% 0.0% 16.9% 83.1% 0.0% 0.0% 1.7% 5.1% 13.3% 55.8%

V301

TRANSPORTATION/TRAVEL/RELOCATIO

N-RELOCATION $4,225,000.00 2.8% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%

R699 SUPPORT- ADMINISTRATIVE: OTHER $8,089,571.22 5.3% 67.0% 0.0% 33.4% 0.0% 47.7% 0.5% 51.8% 0.0% 13.3% 15.2% 13.9% 25.2%

D302

IT AND TELECOM- SYSTEMS 

DEVELOPMENT $6,102,450.00 4.0% 14.7% 0.0% 86.8% 0.0% 92.5% 0.0% 7.5% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 12.5% 35.1%

R425

SUPPORT - PROFESSIONAL: 

ENGINEERING/TECHNICAL $14,744,894.31 9.6% 5.7% 44.8% 49.6% 0.0% 38.3% 23.7% 0.0% 0.0% 1.7% 2.5% 15.5% 55.9%

D313

IT AND TELECOM- COMPUTER AIDED 

DESIGN/COMPUTER AIDED 

MANUFACTURING (CAD/CAM) $3,634,325.88 2.4% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 31.6% 68.4% 0.0% 0.0% 18.2% 0.9% 2.5% 10.3%

R408

SUPPORT - PROFESSIONAL PROGRAM 

MANAGEMENT SUPPORT $3,524,646.65 2.3% 13.1% 0.0% 86.9% 0.0% 91.7% 8.3% 0.0% 0.0% 12.8% 22.7% 1.4% 66.2%

S206 HOUSEKEEPING - GUARD $4,101,567.35 2.7% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 26.9%

R710 See Above

Special Interest Functions

Contract Type Analysis

(as % of PSC Obligations)

Competition Analysis

(as a % of PSC Obligations)

Time of Obligation Analysis

(as % of PSC Obligations)
Appendix C: Inventory Summary - NRC FY 2013

Page 2 of 2 -

Obligations

% Total 

Obligations

Small 

Business SDB

8(a) 

Program VOSB SDVOSB HUBZone WOSB

R710 SUPPORT - MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL $3,614,200.00 2.4% 69.3% 3.7% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.7%

Biggest Percentage of Obligations

D399

IT AND TELECOM- OTHER IT AND 

TELECOMMUNICATIONS $91,748,044.15 59.9% 11.9% 2.6% 2.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.5%

R499 SUPPORT- PROFESSIONAL: OTHER $13,268,002.94 8.7% 12.7% 5.9% 5.9% 4.3% 0.8% 0.3% 6.1%

V301

TRANSPORTATION/TRAVEL/RELOCATIO

N-RELOCATION $4,225,000.00 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

R699 SUPPORT- ADMINISTRATIVE: OTHER $8,089,571.22 5.3% 89.9% 67.9% 88.3% 24.7% 1.0% 20.9% 30.9%

D302

IT AND TELECOM- SYSTEMS 

DEVELOPMENT $6,102,450.00 4.0% 7.5% 6.6% 6.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.5%

R425

SUPPORT - PROFESSIONAL: 

ENGINEERING/TECHNICAL $14,744,894.31 9.6% 71.6% 2.3% 2.3% 0.4% 0.4% 0.0% 37.7%

D313

IT AND TELECOM- COMPUTER AIDED 

DESIGN/COMPUTER AIDED 

MANUFACTURING (CAD/CAM) $3,634,325.88 2.4% 79.6% 68.4% 68.4% 52.0% 1.6% 0.0% 13.0%

R408

SUPPORT - PROFESSIONAL PROGRAM 

MANAGEMENT SUPPORT $3,524,646.65 2.3% 72.2% 70.4% 72.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 15.1%

S206 HOUSEKEEPING - GUARD $4,101,567.35 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

R710

Special Interest Functions

Small Business Analysis

(as a % of PSC Obligations)

See Above
§ 905.4 Use of information. ( a ) Except as provided for in paragraph (b) of this section, information collected by a voluntary fishery data collector may not be introduced by the Secretary as evidence against any consenting owner that is a party to an enforcement proceeding.
( b ) Provided that all applicable evidentiary requirements are satisfied: ( 1 ) Information collected by a voluntary fishery data collector may be introduced in an enforcement proceeding by any party except the Secretary;
( 2 ) If information is introduced pursuant to paragraph (b)(1) of this section, all information collected by a voluntary fishery data collector may be introduced by any other party, including the Secretary.
( c ) Independent evidence derived from information collected by a voluntary fishery data collector may be introduced by any party, including the Secretary, in an enforcement proceeding.
### §1604. Vessels not subject to International Regulations

(a) The International Regulations do not apply to vessels while in the waters of the United States shoreward of the navigational demarcation lines dividing the high seas from harbors, rivers, and other inland waters of the United States.

(b) Whenever a vessel subject to the jurisdiction of the United States is in the territorial waters of a foreign state the International Regulations shall be applicable to, and shall be complied with by, that vessel to the extent that the laws and regulations of the foreign state are not in conflict therewith.

(Pub. L. 95–75, §5, July 27, 1977, 91 Stat. 309; Pub. L. 96–591, §6(1), Dec. 24, 1980, 94 Stat. 3434.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1980—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 96–591 substituted provision providing that the International Regulations do not apply to vessels while in the waters of the United States shoreward of the navigational demarcation lines dividing the high seas from harbors, rivers, and other inland waters of the United States for provisions that had made specific reference to harbors, rivers, and other inland waters of the United States, as defined in section 154 of this title, to the Great Lakes of North America and their connecting and tributary waters, as defined in section 241 of this title, and to the Red River of the North and rivers emptying into the Gulf of Mexico and their tributaries, as defined in section 301 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Pub. L. 96–591, §7, Dec. 24, 1980, 94 Stat. 3435, provided that: "Sections 2, 4, 6(1), and 8(a) [enacting section 2072 and former sections 2001 to 2038 of this title, amending this section, and repealing sections 154 to 159, 171 to 183, 191, 192, 201 to 213, 221, 222, 231, 232, 301 to 303, 311 to 323, 331, 341 to 356, 360, and 360a of this title and sections 526b, 526c, and 526d of former Title 46, Shipping] are effective 12 months after the date of enactment of this Act [Dec. 24, 1980], except that on the Great Lakes, the effective date of sections 2 and 4 [enacting section 2072 and former sections 2001 to 2038 of this title] will be established by the Secretary. [The effective date on the Great Lakes was established as Mar. 1, 1983. See 47 F.R. 15135, Apr. 8, 1982.] Section 5 [enacting section 2073 of this title] is effective on October 1, 1981."
No: III-14-015 May 5, 2014

CONTACT: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663

NRC Names New Senior Resident Inspector at Quad Cities Nuclear Station

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has selected Rob Murray as the new 

Senior Resident Inspector at the Quad Cities nuclear power plant in Cordova, Ill., 

approximately 20 miles northeast of Moline. The nuclear power facility is operated by 

Exelon Generation Co., LLC.

Murray joined the NRC in 2008 as a reactor engineer in Region III. Prior to 

joining the agency, he served six years as a submarine officer in the U.S. Navy. 

Murray, from Orland Park, Ill., holds a bachelor’s degree in electromechanical 

engineering from Loras College and a MBA from Webster University. Most 

recently, he was the Resident Inspector at the Duane Arnold nuclear plant in Palo, Iowa.

“Rob Murray is an excellent inspector with a firm commitment to safety. He will help the NRC 

fulfill its mission of protecting people and the environment by ensuring the Quad Cities plant operates at 

the high standards set by the NRC,” said Region III Administrator Cynthia D. Pederson.

Each commercial nuclear power plant site in the United States has at least two NRC Resident 

Inspectors who monitor day-to-day operations at the plant. 

The NRC Resident Inspectors at Quad Cities can be reached at 309-654-2227.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Harry Levine, Otherwise Called Harry Beckerman, Defendant. Benjamin Cohen, *900Surety, Appellant.

Order affirmed. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trump Casino Holdings, LLC, and Trump Casino Funding, Inc. (the “Companies”) onForm 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donald J. Trump, the Chief Executive Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies. |

 

| /s/ DONALD J. TRUMP                                                                                  |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                                      |   |
| **Donald J. Trump Chief Executive Officer of Trump Casino Holdings, LLC Trump Casino Funding, Inc.** |   |
|                                                                                                 |   |
| **August 14, 2003**                                                                                  |   |
No: 13-075 September 9, 2013

CONTACT: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200 

NRC Meeting in Rockville, MD, Sept. 19 to 

Discuss Cumulative Effects of Regulation

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a public meeting Sept. 19 in Rockville, 

Md., to discuss how the agency can gather new information on accounting for the combined effect of 

multiple regulatory actions. 

The Commission recently directed the staff to continue efforts aimed at ensuring the agency can 

“consider more completely the overall impacts of multiple rules, orders, generic communications, 

advisories, and other regulatory actions on licensees and their ability to focus effectively on items of 

greatest safety import.” The Commission also directed the staff to include opinions from those 

interested in the topic, write up any recommendations and report them to the Commission by March 

2015. 

The meeting will be held in Room T10-A1 of the NRC’s Two White Flint building at 11555 

Rockville Pike in Rockville from 1:30-4:30 p.m. The meeting will focus on efforts to obtain nuclear 

industry case studies on the accuracy of cost and schedule estimates in NRC regulatory analyses. The 

staff expects industry and public interest groups to comment on the effort and the public is invited to 

take part in the discussion. 

Seating will be limited at the meeting, which will include teleconference and webinar access. 

For details, contact Tara Inverso at 301-415-1024 or tara.inverso@nrc.gov by Sept. 12 to ensure 

enough resources are available.
### SUBCHAPTER III—OTHER PROVISIONS RELATING TO RADIOACTIVE WASTE
§ 890.1019 Determining length of debarment based on ownership or control of a sanctioned entity. OPM shall determine the length of debarments of individual providers under 5 U.S.C. 8902a(c)(3) based on the type of violation committed by the sanctioned entity owned or controlled by the person with an ownership or control interest. The types of violations actionable under this provision are: ( a ) *Entity's debarment.* If a provider's debarment is based on his ownership or control of a debarred entity, the debarment shall be concurrent with the entity's debarment. If any of the aggravating or mitigating circumstances identified in § 890.1016 applies directly to the provider that owns or controls the debarred entity and was not considered in setting the period of the entity's debarment, OPM may debar the provider for a period longer or shorter, respectively, than the entity's debarment.
( b ) *Entity's conviction.* If a provider's debarment is based on the criminal conviction of an entity he owns or controls for an offense listed in 5 U.S.C. 8902a(b)(1)-(4), OPM shall debar the provider for a period of no less than 3 years, subject to adjustment for any aggravating or mitigating circumstances identified in § 890.1016 that apply to the provider as an individual.
( c ) *Entity's civil monetary penalty.* If a provider's debarment is based on a civil monetary penalty imposed on an entity he owns or controls, OPM shall debar him for 3 years, subject to adjustment on the basis of the aggravating and mitigating circumstances listed in § 890.1016 that apply to the provider as an individual.
Exhibit 31.2


Rule 13A-14(a)/ 15D-14(a) Certification


Of Principal Accounting Officer




I, Jonathan B. Lipschitz, certify that:




1.           I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-Q of VSB Bancorp, Inc.;




2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.           The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:




a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b. [Omitted in accordance with SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]; and




c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




d. Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.           The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.




Date: May 11, 2010/s/ Jonathan B. LipschitzJonathan B. LipschitzVice President, Controller and Principal Accounting Officer
### SUBCHAPTER XII–H—GRANTS TO COMBAT VIOLENT CRIMES AGAINST WOMEN
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 9, 2021

No. 04-21-00320-CR

Jessie NELSON,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court, Atascosa County, Texas

Trial Court No. 35546

Honorable Bob Brendel, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant, Jessie Ray Nelson, filed a notice of appeal from the judgment on August 4, 

2021. The clerk’s record has been filed. The clerk’s record includes the trial court’s certification 

of defendant’s right of appeal, which states “the Defendant has waived the right of appeal.” 

Rule 25.2(a)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure requires “[t]he trial court [to] 

enter a certification of the defendant’s right of appeal in every case in which it enters a judgment 

of guilt or other appealable order.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). This court must dismiss an appeal 

“if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the 

record.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). However, we are first “obligated to review that record [to] 

ascertain[] whether the certifications [are] defective.” Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2005). A certification is “defective” if it “proves to be inaccurate” “when compared 

with the record.” Id. at 614. 

Appellant pled guilty to the underlying offense and a jury found him guilty. Nothing in 

the record indicates a plea agreement or a waiver of the right to appeal. However, the trial 

court’s certification indicates appellant waived his right to an appeal. Although the certification 

appears to be inaccurate, and therefore defective, this appeal may not proceed on the merits in 

the absence of a certification by the trial court that appellant has the right of appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.2(d). To “ensur[e] that [appellant’s] right to appeal is not abridged due to ‘defects or 

irregularities’ which can be corrected,” we ABATE this appeal for a period of ten days to allow 

the trial court to review the record and to either (1) submit an amended Rule 25.2 certification 

that comports with the record or (2) direct the trial court clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s 

FILE COPY
record that evidences the appellant waived his right to appeal. See Dears, 154 S.W.3d at 614-

15; TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c), 37.1. We ORDER the clerk to file a supplemental record containing 

any amended certification signed by the trial court and/or a record showing appellant waived his 

right to appeal not later than August 24, 2021.

We ORDER the clerk of this court to serve copies of this order on the attorneys of record, 

the trial court judge, and the trial court clerk. 

_________________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of August, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY