alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali C 391/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0987 |
| --- | --- |
| Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali
  tal-Unjoni Ewropea | C 391 |
| | |
| Edizzjoni bil-Malti | Informazzjoni u Avviżi | Volum 6316 ta' Novembru 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0987

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali

tal-Unjoni Ewropea

C 391

Edizzjoni bil-Malti

Informazzjoni u Avviżi

Volum 6316 ta' Novembru 2020

---

| Werrej | Paġna |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informazzjoni |
| | INFORMAZZJONI MINN ISTITUZZJONIJIET, KORPI, UFFIĊĊJI U AĠENZIJI TAL-UNJONI EWROPEA |
| | il–Kunsill |
| 2020/C 391/01 | Deċiżjoni tal-Kunsill tal-10 ta’ Novembru 2020 li taħtar il-President tal-Bordijiet tal-Appell tal-Uffiċċju tal-Proprjetà Intellettwali tal-Unjoni Ewropea | 1 |

Werrej

Paġna

IV   Informazzjoni

INFORMAZZJONI MINN ISTITUZZJONIJIET, KORPI, UFFIĊĊJI U AĠENZIJI TAL-UNJONI EWROPEA

il–Kunsill

2020/C 391/01

Deċiżjoni tal-Kunsill tal-10 ta’ Novembru 2020 li taħtar il-President tal-Bordijiet tal-Appell tal-Uffiċċju tal-Proprjetà Intellettwali tal-Unjoni Ewropea

1

---

| MT | |
| --- | --- |

MT

---

IV Informazzjoni

INFORMAZZJONI MINN ISTITUZZJONIJIET, KORPI, UFFIĊĊJI U AĠENZIJI TAL-UNJONI EWROPEA

il–Kunsill

| 16.11.2020 | MT | Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea | C 391/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2020

MT

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea

C 391/1

---

DEĊIŻJONI TAL-KUNSILL

tal-10 ta’ Novembru 2020

li taħtar il-President tal-Bordijiet tal-Appell tal-Uffiċċju tal-Proprjetà Intellettwali tal-Unjoni Ewropea

(2020/C 391/01)

IL-KUNSILL TAL-UNJONI EWROPEA,

Wara li kkunsidra t-Trattat dwar il-Funzjonament tal-Unjoni Ewropea,

Wara li kkunsidra r-Regolament (UE) 2017/1001 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tal-14 ta’ Ġunju 2017 dwar it-trademark tal-Unjoni Ewropea (1), u b’mod partikolari l-Artikolu 166(1) tiegħu,

Billi:

Fit-8 ta’ Ġunju 2020, il-Kunsill irċieva mingħand il-Bord tat-Tmexxija tal-Uffiċċju tal-Proprjetà Intellettwali tal-Unjoni Ewropea (EUIPO) lista ta’ kandidati proposti għall-kariga ta’ President tal-Bordijiet tal-Appell tal-EUIPO,

ADOTTA DIN ID-DEĊIŻJONI:

Artikolu 1

1.   Is-Sur João Nuno MAROCO AMARAL NEGRÃO, imwieled f’Lisbona (il-Portugall) fit-2 ta’ Novembru 1970, huwa b’dan maħtur President tal-Bordijiet tal-Appell tal-Uffiċċju tal-Proprjetà Intellettwali tal-Unjoni Ewropea (EUIPO) għal mandat ta’ ħames snin.

2.   Id-data li fiha jibda l-mandat ta’ ħames snin imsemmi fil-paragrafu 1 għandha tiġi ddeterminata mill-Bord tat-Tmexxija tal-EUIPO.

Artikolu 2

Din id-Deċiżjoni għandha tidħol fis-seħħ fid-data tal-pubblikazzjoni tagħha f’Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea.

Magħmul fi Brussell, l-10 ta’ Novembru 2020.

Għall-Kunsill

Il-President

M. ROTH

---

(1)  ĠU L 154, 16.6.2017, p. 1.

1

---
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

MAR 16 1999

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v.

RAFAEL NUNEZ-PULIDO

aka

MIGUEL AGUSTIN ALVAREZ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

No. 98-4118

(Dist. of Utah)

(D.C. No. 97-CR-131-C)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before TACHA, McKAY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The court,

therefore, honors the parties’ requests and orders the case submitted without oral

argument.
-2-

Raphael Nunez-Pulido (“Nunez”) entered a conditional plea of guilty

pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(a)(2) to one count of possession of

methamphetamine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). 

On appeal, Nunez challenges the district court’s denial of Nunez’s motion to

suppress. This court exercises jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

In reviewing a decision denying a motion to suppress, this court reviews a

district court’s findings of fact for clear error and views the evidence in the light

most favorable to the United States. United States v. Baker, 30 F.3d 1278, 1280

(10th Cir. 1994). The reasonableness of a search and seizure under the Fourth

Amendment is a question of law to be reviewed de novo. United States v.

Martinez-Cigarroa, 44 F.3d 908, 910 (10th Cir. 1995).

The court has undertaken a careful review of the magistrate judge’s Report

and Recommendation, the district court order, the parties’ briefs and contentions,

and the entire record on appeal. In light of that close review, this court concludes

that given the totality of the circumstances surrounding the stop and detention, the

district court did not err in concluding that the continued detention of Nunez was

supported by reasonable, articulable suspicion of criminal activity. Accordingly,

the district court’s denial of Nunez’s motion to suppress is AFFIRMED for
2

In light of our conclusion that the continued detention of Nunez was

supported by reasonable, articulable suspicion, this court need not address the

waiver argument raised by the United States in its brief on appeal.

-3-

substantially those reasons set out in the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated February 20, 1998.2

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Michael R. Murphy

Circuit Judge
#### Vernon SCALF, Movant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

May 11, 1948.

J. J. Tye and Victor A. Jordan for movant.

A. E. Punk, Attorney General, and Squire N. Williams, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Commonwealth, opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal denied. Judgment affirmed.
No: II-14-040 July 24, 2014

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416

NRC Lifts Confirmatory Order at Honeywell Metropolis Works 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has advised officials at Honeywell Metropolis Works that 

they have satisfied the terms of a 2012 Confirmatory Order issued to the uranium conversion plant requiring 

modifications to protect the facility against major earthquakes and tornadoes.

During an inspection in May 2012, the NRC determined that process equipment at Honeywell lacked 

adequate seismic restraints, supports and bracing to ensure integrity during such events. Honeywell agreed to 

make the modifications, which were outlined in the Confirmatory Order, issued in October 2012. 

The NRC confirmed during inspections that the completed modifications complied with agency 

requirements and authorized the facility to resume operations in July 2013. The NRC reviewed Honeywell’s 

revised Integrated Safety Analysis last month and determined it was adequate, clearing the way for the lifting 

of the Confirmatory Order this week.

“Honeywell’s corrective actions have satisfied the terms of the Confirmatory Order, which we have 

closed,” said Victor McCree, the NRC’s Region II administrator. “The company has taken the necessary 

actions to protect the community and the environment, which was our original goal.”

The Metropolis, Ill., plant converts milled uranium into uranium hexafluoride gas, which is then 

enriched at other facilities to make fuel for commercial nuclear power reactors.
EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Charles City Railway Line, Inc.

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning the continued status of 

Charles City Railway Line, Inc. (CCRY), B.A. No. 4645, as an employer under the Railroad 

Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. §231 et seq.) (RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act

(45 U.S.C. §351 et sea.VRUIAL

Information regarding CCRY was provided by Barbara Uetz, former General Manager of

CCRY. She stated that CCRY ceased railroad operations on February 24, 1994, due to lack of 

operating funds. She advised that all payroll taxes have been paid for the first quarter of 1994.

In Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC), Directed Service Order No. 1515, decided on

March 4, 1994, the ICC granted Cedar River Railroad Company’s request to provide rail service 

over CCRY’s line.

Section 202.11 (20 CFR §202.11) of the Board’s regulations states:

The employer status of any company or person shall terminate whenever such

company or person loses any of the characteristics essential to the existence of an

employer status.

According to the information provided by Ms. Uetz, CCRY ceased operations on February 24,

1994. The ICC has granted Cedar River Railroad Company’s request to provide service over 

CCRY’s rail line. Since CCRY no longer possess the characteristics of an operating railroad

company covered by the Acts, CCRY is no longer a covered employer under the RRA and

The Board therefore finds that effective with the close of business February 24, 1994, the date

it ceased operations, Charles City Railway Line, Inc. ceased being a covered employer under

the RRA and the RUIA.

RUIA.

V. M/Speakman, Jr.

Jerome F. Kever

BCD 1995-52 BA # 4645
### Part F—Additional Requirements To Regulate Safety of Drinking Water
Exhibit 31.2

FORM 10-Q CERTIFICATION

I, Darwin L. Stump, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this  report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's first fiscal quarter of 2004 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors auditors and the audit committee of the board of directors of the Managing General Partner of the registrant:

(a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:  May 13, 2004               
 /s/ Darwin L. Stump                           

Darwin L. Stump

Chief Financial Officer of the 

Managing General Partner of the Registrant
#### § 80.4 Signature of persons unable to sign their name.

A person requesting Census information who is unable to sign his or her name shall make an “X” mark where signature is required, and the mark must be witnessed by two persons who know the applicant. They must also sign the application certifying the applicant's identity. In the case of such persons who are unable to make an “X” mark, Census information can be released upon receipt of a physician's sworn statement verifying the disability and the written request of a parent, brother, sister, child or a spouse.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0607-0117)

[40 FR 53232, Nov. 17, 1975, as amended at 48 FR 56744, Dec. 23, 1983]
### SUBCHAPTER IV—FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
### subpart 20—national institute on minority health and health disparities

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 111–148, title X, §10334(c)(1)(A)–(C), (D)(ii), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 973, redesignated subpart 6 of part E of this subchapter as this subpart and substituted "National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities" for "National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities" in heading.
B.C.D. 03-72

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Appalachian Railcar Services, Inc.

SEP 1 8 2003

This is the decision of the Railroad Retirement Board regarding the

continued status of Appalachian Railcar Services, Inc. (ARS) as an

employer under the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231, et

seq.) (RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45

U.S.C. § 351, et seg.) (RUIA).

ARS operated a shortline railroad under a contract with Big Eagle 

Rail, LLC1, and performed rail car repairs. It was held to be an

employer under the Acts effective August 20, 2000, (B.A. Number

9410) to the extent that it operated the shortline railroad for Big

Eagle Rail. The operation of the shortline railroad was to be taken

over by Short Line Services, Inc., an affiliate of ARS2, under a

contract entered into April 1, 2003, between Big Eagle and Short

Line Services. The operation by Short Line Services was to begin as

of the date of the Board’s decision holding Short Line Services to be

an employer, which was June 25, 2003.

Section 202.11 of the Board’s regulations provides that:

The employer status of any company or person

shall terminate whenever such company or person loses

any of the characteristics essential to the existence of an

employer status.

Through the termination of its operation of the short line railroad,

ARS has lost the characteristics essential to the existence of an

employer status. Accordingly, the Board holds that ARS ceased to be

an employer under the RRA and RUIA effective with the close of

business on June 25, 2003. Cf. Rev Ruling 82-99, 1982-2 C.B. 154,

wherein the Internal Revenue Service ruled that a railroad ceases to

1 Big Eagle Rail was held to be an employer under the RRA and the RUIA as ofAugust 20, 2000

(B.C.D. No. 01-85, December 4, 2001).

2 On June 25, 2003, the Board held Short Line Services to be an employer as ofthat date (B.C.D.

No. 03-57, B.A. No. 2415).

BA#9410
-2-

Appalachian Railcar Services, Inc.

be an employer subject to taxes under the Railroad Retirement Tax 

Act when the railroad’s employees stop performing services in

connection with the railroad’s carrier activities.

ferome F. Kever
No: II-13-049 August 12, 2013

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416

NRC Schedules Regulatory Conference to Discuss 

Apparent Violation at Robinson Nuclear Plant

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled a regulatory conference with Duke Energy to 

discuss the risk significance of an apparent violation related to the company’s failure to perform adequate 

preventive maintenance on the dedicated shutdown diesel generator at the Robinson nuclear power plant.

The Robinson plant, operated by Duke, is near Hartsville, S.C., about 28 miles northwest of Florence.

The conference is scheduled for Monday, Aug. 19, at 10:30 a.m. at the NRC’s Region 2 offices, 245 

Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200, in Atlanta. The public is invited to attend, and NRC officials will 

answer questions from the public after the business portion of the conference.

NRC and Duke officials will discuss the risk significance of the apparent violation, which was 

identified after the failure of the radiator fan belts and subsequent automatic shutdown of the dedicated 

shutdown diesel generator in October 2012. There was no actual event requiring the use of that diesel generator 

and it was repaired and returned to service. However, the fan belts were degraded, in part, because of 

inadequate inspection, maintenance and periodic replacement. The belt failures could have prevented the

shutdown diesel generator from being available during a loss of power or a fire. 

Even though there was no threat to workers or people living near the plant, the NRC has preliminarily 

determined the finding is white, meaning it has low to moderate safety significance.

The NRC uses color-coded inspection finding to assess plant performance. The colors range from

green, or very low safety significance, to white, yellow and red, which has the highest safety significance.

No decision on the final safety significance and any additional NRC actions will be made at the 

conference. That decision will be announced at a later time. 

The NRC inspection report with more details on the apparent violation is available on the NRC 

website.
**From:** Inspire 1 <beta@dji.com> **Sent:** Thursday, July 9, 2015 11:01 PM **To:** Rowland, Jason **Subject:** You are accepted to DJI Inspire 1 Beta testing

Dear Jason, Your application has been reviewed and we are pleased to inform you that you have been accepted! You will receive an E-mail within the next few days when the beta is ready to begin. In the event that the project is full, you will be placed on an "Alternates" team in case there is a future opening. In the meantime please bookmark this site as it will be your primary communication portal during the beta period. Thank you for your interest, **The Inspire 1 Beta Team** Page 1 of 1

7/ 10/2015 file:///C:/Program%20Files%20(x86)/Documentum/CTS/docbases/ProDocbase/config/temp_sessions/335141679

...
###### Editorial Note on Part 8b

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 8b appear at 68 FR 51353, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 8b.2 Application.

This part applies to each recipient of Federal financial assistance from the Department of Commerce and to each program or activity receiving such assistance. The requirements of this part do not apply to the ultimate beneficiaries of Federal financial assistance in the program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bayview Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material

respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the

Company.



Date: November 15, 2004





/s/ Paul Ng

------------------------------------

Paul Ng

Principal Financial Officer
## Congressional Justification

The NLM Congressional Justification provides the Senate and House Appropriations Committees detailed estimates and justifications for research and research support activities (infrastructure, administrative, etc.) that NLM would anticipate funding at the President's Budget Request level.
        - 2024 Congressional Justification (PDF)
        - View previous NLM Congressional Justifications

## Strategic Plan

The NLM Strategic Plan positions the Library to carry out its congressionally mandated mission and support the important work of NIH by creating a future in which data and information transform and accelerate biomedical discovery, improving health and health care.
        - A Platform for Biomedical Discovery and Data-Powered Health: National Library of Medicine Strategic Plan 2017–2027
        - View previous NLM Strategic Plans

## Annual Reports for NLM Program and Services

    - The annual reports are in PDF format.       
Fiscal Year 2017Fiscal Year 2016Fiscal Year 2015Fiscal Year 2014Fiscal Year 2013Fiscal Year 2012Fiscal Year 2011Fiscal Year 2010

Fiscal Year 2009Fiscal Year 2008Fiscal Year 2007Fiscal Year 2006Fiscal Year 2005Fiscal Year 2004Fiscal Year 2003

Fiscal Year 2002Fiscal Year 2001Fiscal Year 2000Fiscal Year 1999Fiscal Year 1998Fiscal Year 1997Fiscal Years 1943-1996
 

## Additional Reports

    - Forecasting Costs for Preserving, Archiving, and Promoting Access to Biomedical Data  (2020)
    - Report of the Blue Ribbon Panel Review: Intramural Research Program (PDF)  (2018)
    - National Library of Medicine Working Group Final Report to the Advisory Committee to the Director (PDF)  (2015)
    - Requirements for an NLM Digital Repository: Report and Recommendations (PDF)  (2007) and  Recommendations on NLM Digital Repository Software (PDF)  (2008)
    - Computational Technology for Effective Health Care: Immediate Steps and Strategic Directions  (2009)

Previous NLM publications and productions can be found in the Digital Collections.

Last Reviewed: March 29, 2023
§ 1500.105 Ballots. ( a ) The agent(s) shall accept all ballots cast. However, if an agent determines a need for additional review for any reason, the agent shall endorse above the voter's signature on the ballot with a statement to the effect that the ballot needs additional scrutiny. The agent will attach to the ballot information regarding the reasons for additional review, the results of any investigations made with respect to the review, and the final disposition of the review. Agents will not count ballots found to be invalid or late, a non-exhaustive list of examples include: ( 1 ) The ballot is blank, missing a vote, has no signature;
( 2 ) Both voting boxes are marked in the vote section;
( 3 ) The ballot arrives after midnight of the last day of the referendum period;
( 4 ) The ballot is in a state that agents cannot determine the vote; or
( 5 ) The ballot has a name that is different on the ballot from that of the registered voter, except for votes cast by power of attorney with sufficient documentation to prove such power of attorney.
( b ) As stated in § 1500.102(e), the Secretary does not authorize proxy voting. However, agents will accept power of attorney votes with proper documentation.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-15-0055, Denial of Petition for Rulemaking Submitted by the Commonwealth of Massachusettes (PRM-51-29)

Accession Number: ML14063A370

Date Released: Wednesday, September 2, 2015

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML14063A378 - SECY-15-0055:  Denial of Petition for Rulemaking Submitted by the Commonwealth of Massachusettes (PRM-51-29) (5 page(s), 4/7/2015)
    - ML14063A407 - SECY-15-0055:  Enclosure 1 - Federal Register Notice, Denial of Petition for Rulemaking submitted by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (PRM-51-29) (24 page(s), 4/7/2015)
    - ML14063A411 - SECY-15-0055:  Enclosure 2 - Draft Letter to Petitioner, Denial of Petition for Rulemaking submitted by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (PRM-51-29) (3 page(s), 4/7/2015)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer