alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1107.26 Recordkeeping. ( a ) A manufacturer of a children's product subject to an applicable children's product safety rule must maintain the following records: ( 1 ) A copy of the Children's Product Certificate for each product. The children's product covered by the certificate must be clearly identifiable and distinguishable from other products;
( 2 ) Records of each third party certification test. The manufacturer must have separate certification tests records for each manufacturing site;
( 3 ) Records of one of the following for periodic tests of a children's product: ( i ) A periodic test plan and periodic test results;
( ii ) A production testing plan, production test results, and periodic test results; or
( iii ) Testing results of tests conducted by a testing laboratory accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 (see § 1107.21 for availability) and periodic test results.
( 4 ) Records documenting the testing of representative samples, as set forth in § 1107.21(f), including the number of representative samples selected and the procedure used to select representative samples. Records also must include the basis for inferring compliance of the product manufactured during the periodic testing interval from the results of the tested samples;
( 5 ) Records of descriptions of all material changes in product design, manufacturing process, and sourcing of component parts, and the certification tests run and the test values; and
( 6 ) Records of the undue influence procedures, including training materials and training records of all employees trained on these procedures, including attestations described at § 1107.24(b)(1).
( b ) A manufacturer must maintain the records specified in paragraph (a) of this section for five years. The manufacturer must make these records available, either in hard copy or electronically, such as through an Internet Web site, for inspection by the CPSC upon request. Records may be maintained in languages other than English if they can be: ( 1 ) Provided immediately by the manufacturer to the CPSC; and
( 2 ) Translated accurately into English by the manufacturer within 48 hours of a request by the CPSC, or any longer period negotiated with CPSC staff.
[76 FR 69541, Nov. 8, 2011, as amended at 77 FR 72219, Dec. 5, 2012; 86 FR 22866, Apr. 30, 2021]
No. III-13-004

Contacts: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663

 February 18, 2013

 E-Mail: opa3@nrc.gov 

NRC SCHEDULES REGULATORY CONFERENCE TO DISCUSS

APPARENT VIOLATION AT PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR STATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a regulatory conference 

with officials of Northern States Power Company, Minnesota, on Monday, Feb. 25, to 

discuss a preliminary inspection finding in the emergency preparedness area. The twounit plant is located in Welch, Minn., 28 miles southeast of Minneapolis.

NRC and company officials will discuss the significance of the inspection finding, 

which involved the failure to follow and maintain the effectiveness of the plant’s

emergency plan. The finding did not represent an immediate safety concern. 

The meeting is scheduled for 12:30 p.m. CST in the NRC’s Region III office, 

located at 2443 Warrenville Road, in Lisle, Ill. The public is invited to observe and NRC 

officials will be available to answer questions. 

The NRC evaluates regulatory performance at commercial nuclear power plants 

with a color-coded system which classifies findings as green, white, yellow or red, in 

increasing order of safety significance. The NRC’s preliminary evaluation determined 

that the violation at Prairie Island was “white,” which means it has a low to moderate 

safety significance. 

No decisions on the final safety significance or other NRC actions will be made at 

the conference. Those decisions will be made by NRC officials at a later time. 

The NRC inspection report in which the apparent violation is documented is 

publicly available on the NRC website http://www.nrc.gov/ . The number to access the 

report is ML13024A420. 

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases 

are posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region III

2443 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532
§ 1130.1 Purpose, scope, and effective date. ( a ) *Purpose.* This part prescribes a consumer product safety rule establishing requirements for consumer registration of durable infant or toddler products. These requirements are intended to improve the effectiveness of recalls of, and safety alerts regarding, such products.
( b ) *Scope.* Part 1130 applies to manufacturers, including importers, of durable infant or toddler products, as defined in § 1130.2(a). It does not apply to infant or child restraint systems intended for use in automobiles that are covered by the registration program of the National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration (NHTSA) at 49 CFR 571.213, or to products that comprise a travel system, and are sold with a child restraint system that is covered by the NHTSA registration program at 49 CFR 571.213.
( c ) *Compliance Date.* Compliance with this part 1130 shall be required on June 28, 2010 for the following products: full-size cribs and nonfull-size cribs; toddler beds; high chairs, booster chairs, and hook-on chairs; bath seats; gates and other enclosures for confining a child; play yards; stationary activity centers; infant carriers; strollers; walkers; swings; and bassinets and cradles. Compliance with this part 1130 shall be required on December 29, 2010 for the following products: Children's folding chairs, changing tables, infant bouncers, infant bath tubs, bed rails and infant slings. Compliance with this part 1130 shall be required on September 24, 2020 for contoured changing pads (a type of baby changing product). The rule shall apply to durable infant or toddler products, as defined in § 1130.2(a), that are manufactured on or after those dates.
[74 FR 68676, Dec. 29, 2009, as amended at 84 FR 49949, Sept. 24, 2019]
#### In the Matter of City of Syracuse Industrial Development Agency, Respondent, Relative to Acquiring Certain Interests in the Carousel Center Site for the Phased Public Project Known as DestiNY USA. H & M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P., Appellant; Carousel Center Company, L.P., Respondent.

(Appeal No. 8.)

[821 NYS2d 518]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (John V Centra, J.), entered May 12, 2006 in a proceeding pursuant to EDPL article 4. The order, among other things, denied the motion of respondent H & M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P to dismiss the petition, granted the petition and authorized petitioner to acquire by condemnation certain Carousel Center interests of that respondent.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in *Matter of City of Syracuse Indus. Dev. Agency (J.C. Penney Corp., Inc.*— Carousel *Ctr. Co.,*L.P.) (32 AD3d 1332 [2006]).

All concur except Hurlbutt, J.P., who dissents and votes to reverse in accordance with the same dissenting memorandum as in *Matter of City of Syracuse Indus. Dev. Agency (J.C. Penney Corp., Inc.*— Carousel *Ctr. Co.,*L.P.) (32 AD3d 1332 [2006]). Present — Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Gorski and Green, JJ.
B.C.D. 03-32 APR 0 3 2003

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Western Railway of Alabama (WRA)

This is a determination of the Railroad Retirement Board

concerning the continuing status of Western Railway of Alabama 

(WRA) (B.A. No. 1527) as an employer under the Railroad

Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. §231 et seep) (RRA) and the Railroad 

Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. §351 et seep) (RUIA).

WRA has been an employer under the RRA and RUIA, with

service creditable from March 15, 1883.

In Surface Transportation Board (STB) Finance Docket 34290,

decided December 19, 2002, WRA and CSX Transportation Inc.

(B.A. No. 1524) (CSXT) filed a verified notice of exemption with

respect to a proposed corporate restructuring, through which

WRA, which is controlled by CSXT, would be merged into CSXT,

with CSXT as the surviving entity. According to the STB decision,

pursuant to an agreement with WRA, CSXT would acquire and

own all of the assets of WRA and would be responsible for all

debts, liabilities and obligations of WRA. As stated in the STB

decision, the purpose of the merger transaction was to reduce

corporate overhead and duplication by eliminating one corporation 

(i.e. WRA) while retaining the same assets to service customers.

As stated in the STB decision, the separate existence of WRA

would cease and CSXT would be the surviving entity. According

to the Agreement and Plan of Merger between WRA and CSXT,

WRA’s merger with CSXT was to take effect upon the exemption 

by the STB (section 1.2 of Plan of Merger).

Information regarding WRA was furnished by Mr. Walter G.

Williard, Director-Payroll & Excise Taxes for CSX Corporation.

Information provided by Mr. Williard shows that WRA owned and 

operated approximately 128.3 miles of railroad from West Point,

Georgia to Selma, Alabama. As stated above, Mr. Williard 

reported that WRA, an Aabama corporation, merged into CSXT

on December 3, 2002, pursuant to authority in STB Finance

Docket No. 34290. According to Mr. Williard, Mr. M. J. Ward was

BA#1527
-2-

Western Railway of Alabama (WRA)

the President of WRA. WRA’s directors were P.J. Aftoora, F.J. 

Favorite, O.A. Marrow, W.B. Reed, R.R. Yates and Mr. Ward. Mr.

Willard stated that WRA had no employees and that all of WRA’s

transactions were handled by the employees of CSXT.

Section 202.11 of the Board’s regulations provides that:

The employer status of any company or person 

shall terminate whenever such company or person 

loses any of the characteristics essential to the

existence of an employer status. (20 CFR 202.11.)

The record in this case indicates that WRA lost the characteristics

essential to the existence of its employer status and ceased being a

covered rail carrier employer effective December 3, 2002, the date

on which WRA merged into CSXT.

V. M. Speakman, Jr.

erome F. Kever
§ 1212.3 Requirements for multi-purpose lighters. ( a ) A multi-purpose lighter subject to this part 1212 shall be resistant to successful operation by at least 85% of the child-test panel when tested in the manner prescribed by § 1212.4.
( b ) The child-resistant mechanism of a multi-purpose lighter subject to this part 1212 must: ( 1 ) Operate safely when used in a normal and convenient manner,
( 2 ) Comply with this § 1212.3 for the reasonably expected life of the lighter,
( 3 ) Not be easy to deactivate or prevent from complying with this § 1212.3.
( 4 ) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(5) of this section, automatically reset when or before the user lets go of the lighter.
( 5 ) The child-resistant mechanism of a multi-purpose lighter subject to this part 1212 that allows hands-free operation must: ( i ) Require operation of an additional feature (e.g., lock, switch, etc.) after a flame is achieved before hands-free operation can occur;
( ii ) Have a manual mechanism for turning off the flame when the hands-free function is used; and either
( iii ) Automatically reset when or before the user lets go of the lighter when the hands-free function is not used; or
( iv ) Automatically reset when or before the user lets go of the lighter after turning off the flame when the hands-free feature is used.
### §10510. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 10510 was editorially reclassified as section 50109 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
IIB 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 33 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 19, 2011 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend the Securities Act of 1933 to specify when certain 

securities issued in connection with church plans are 

treated as exempted securities for purposes of that Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 33 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Church Plan Invest3 ment Clarification Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 AMENDMENT. 

5 Section 3(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 

6 U.S.C. 77c(a)(2)) is amended— 

7 (1) by inserting ‘‘(other than a retirement in8 come account described in section 403(b)(9) of the 

9 Internal Revenue Code of 1986, to the extent that 

10 the interest or participation in such single trust fund 

11 or collective trust fund is issued to a church, a con12 vention or association of churches, or an organiza13 tion described in section 414(e)(3)(A) of such Code 

14 establishing or maintaining the retirement income 

15 account or to a trust established by any such entity 

16 in connection with the retirement income account)’’ 

17 after ‘‘403(b) of such Code’’; and 

18 (2) by inserting ‘‘(other than a person partici19 pating in a church plan who is described in section 

20 414(e)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

21 1986)’’ after ‘‘section 401(c)(1) of such Code’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 18, 2011. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
§ 971.301 Required findings. Before the Administrator may certify an application for a commercial recovery permit, the Administrator must: ( a ) Approve the size and location of the commercial recovery area selected by the applicant, and this approval will occur unless the Administrator determines that ( 1 ) the area is not a logical mining unit under § 971.501, or
( 2 ) commercial recovery activities in the proposed area would result in a significant adverse environmental effect which cannot be avoided by imposition of reasonable restrictions; and
( b ) Find that the applicant— ( 1 ) Has demonstrated that, upon issuance or transfer of the permit, the applicant will be financially responsible to meet all obligations which may be required to engage in its proposed commercial recovery activities;
( 2 ) Has demonstrated that, upon permit issuance or transfer, it will possess, or have access to, the technological capability to engage in the proposed commercial recovery;
( 3 ) Has satisfactorily fulfilled all past obligations under any license or permit previously issued or transferred to the applicant under the Act;
( 4 ) Has a commercial recovery plan which meets the requirements of § 971.203; and
( 5 ) Has paid the permit fee specified in § 971.208.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Superior Oil & Gas Co. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, B.J. Sparks, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      August 19, 2008


*/s/
                B.J.
                Sparks*B.J. Sparks
                  Chief
                    Executive Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Superior Oil & Gas Co. and will be retained by Superior Oil & Gas Co.
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Timothy M. Massaro, Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 347]

Appeal from a judgment of the Livingston County Court (Ronald A. Cicoria, J.), rendered April 15, 2003. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of grand larceny in the fourth degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him after a jury trial of grand larceny in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 155.30 [1]). Defendant was convicted for stealing a restored 10-inch metal lathe. Defendant contends that the value of the metal lathe was not established by the People beyond a reasonable doubt, and that the evidence is thus legally insufficient to support his conviction. We disagree. The People presented the testimony of the owner of the metal lathe, who was qualified by County Court as an expert for purposes of valuing the lathe, that it would cost him approximately $2,800 to replace the lathe and tooling. Such testimony was sufficient to establish the value of the metal lathe and thus the evidence is sufficient to support defendant’s conviction of grand larceny in the fourth degree *(see*§ 155.20 [1]).

Contrary to defendant’s further contention, the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence *(see generally People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Defendant did not dispute that he possessed the metal lathe and refused to return it. Although the theory on defense was that defendant was given the metal lathe by the owner, it was for the trier of fact to determine the credibility of the witnesses and it cannot be said that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence where the jury credited the testimony of the owner that defendant took the lathe without his permission *(see generally People v Shaw,*277 AD2d 1052 [2000], *lv denied*96 NY2d 806 [2001]).

Finally, even assuming, arguendo, that the postarrest statements of defendant to police were improperly admitted, as defendant contends and the People concede, we conclude that there is no reasonable possibility that the admission of those statements might have contributed to the conviction and thus, any error in their admission is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt *(see People v Bastian,*294 AD2d 882, 884 [2002], *lv denied*98 NY2d 694 [2002]; *see generally People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 237 [1975]). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Kehoe, Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.
§ 1145.17 Multi-purpose lighters that can be operated by children; risks of death or injury. ( a ) The Commission finds that it is in the public interest to regulate under the Consumer Product Safety Act any risks of injury associated with the fact that multi-purpose lighters can be operated by young children, rather than to regulate such risks under the Federal Hazardous Substances Act or the Poison Prevention Packaging Act of 1970.
( b ) Therefore, if the Commission finds regulation to be necessary, risks of death or injury that are associated with multi-purpose lighters because the lighters can be operated by young children shall be regulated under one or more provisions of the Consumer Product Safety Act. Other risks that are associated with such lighters, and that are based solely on the fact that the lighters contain a hazardous substance, shall continue to be regulated under the Federal Hazardous Substances Act.
[64 FR 71884, Dec. 22, 1999]
### SUBCHAPTER VI—YOUTHBUILD PROJECTS
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3384 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a tax credit for 

the employment of wounded warriors. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 4, 2011 

Mr. HEINRICH (for himself and Mr. LUJA ́N) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

a tax credit for the employment of wounded warriors. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wounded Warriors 

5 Employment Opportunity Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. WOUNDED WARRIORS WORK OPPORTUNITY TAX 

7 CREDITS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (3) of section 51(b) of 

9 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

10 ‘‘subsection (d)(3)(A)(ii))’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3384 IH

1 (d)(3)(A)(ii) ($24,000 per year in the case of any indi2 vidual who is a qualified veteran by reason of subsection 

3 (d)(3)(A)(ii)(II) for taxable years ending before January 

4 1, 2017)’’. 

5 (b) SIMPLIFIED CERTIFICATION.—Section 51(d) of 

6 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding 

7 a new paragraph (15) as follows— 

8 ‘‘(15) CREDIT ALLOWED FOR UNEMPLOYED

9 DISABLED VETERANS.— 

10 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Any qualified veteran 

11 under paragraph (3)(A)(ii)(II) will be treated 

12 as certified by the designated local agency as 

13 having aggregate periods of unemployment if 

14 the veteran is certified by the designated local 

15 agency as being in receipt of unemployment 

16 compensation under State or Federal law for 

17 not less than 6 months during the 1-year period 

18 ending on the hiring date. 

19 ‘‘(B) REGULATORY AUTHORITY.—The Sec20 retary in his discretion may provide alternative 

21 methods for certification.’’. 

22 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

23 this section shall apply to individuals who begin work for 

24 the employer after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
§ 764.4 Reporting of violations. ( a ) *Where to report.* If a person learns that an export control violation of the EAR has occurred or may occur, that person may notify: Office of Export Enforcement, Bureau of Industry and Security,U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Room H-4520, Washington, D.C. 20230, Tel: (202) 482-1208, Facsimile: (202) 482-0964
or, for violations of part 760 of the EAR: Office of Antiboycott Compliance, Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Room H-6099C, Washington, D.C. 20230, Tel: (202) 482-2381, Facsimile: (202) 482-0913.
( b ) *Failure to report violations.* Failure to report potential violations may result in the unwarranted issuance of licenses or exports without the required licenses to the detriment of the interests of the United States.
( c ) *Reporting requirement distinguished.* The reporting provisions in paragraph (a) of this section are not “reporting requirements” within the meaning of § 764.2(i) of this part.
( d ) *Formerly embargoed destinations.* Reporting requirements for activities within the scope of § 764.2(e) that involve items subject to the EAR which may have been illegally exported or reexported to Libya prior to the lifting of the comprehensive embargo on Libya are found in § 764.7 of the EAR.
[61 FR 12902, Mar. 25, 1996, as amended at 70 FR 14391, Mar. 22, 2005]