alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region III

2443 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. III-13-006

Contact: Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil (630) 829-9663

March 7, 2013

E-Mail: OPA3.Resource@nrc.gov 

NRC TO DISCUSS PRESSURIZED THERMAL SHOCK BASICS FOR PALISADES; 

WEBINAR TO BE HELD MARCH 19

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a webinar on March 19, to discuss 

Pressurized Thermal Shock and how it relates to the Palisades nuclear power plant. The plant is 

owned by Entergy Nuclear Operations and located in Covert, Mich., approximately 40 miles 

west of Kalamazoo.

Pressurized thermal shock is a phenomenon that would occur in a rare accident scenario 

in which a large amount of cold water has to be injected into the reactor resulting in its rapid 

cooling. This rapid cooling increases the stresses on the vessel and could challenge the vessel’s 

integrity.

“We are committed to keeping the public informed about the NRC’s oversight of the 

Palisades plant,” said NRC Region III Administrator Charles Casto. “This webinar will give us 

an opportunity to continue to discuss with the public issues of concern to them and how the NRC 

is handling these technical issues.”

The meeting is being held on a Tuesday after typical work hours as a direct result of 

feedback we received from the public to discuss issues at a more convenient time when people 

may not be working. The previous webinar on through-wall leaks was held on a Saturday to 

allow more public participation.

The NRC Region III office, located in Lisle, Ill., will first present information about 

pressurized thermal shock, NRC’s regulations on this issue and how it relates to Palisades. 

During the second part of the meeting the NRC staff will answer questions submitted online 

through the webinar. 

The webinar will be held from 5-6 p.m. EDT (4-5 p.m. CDT). Participants will be able to 

view presentation slides prepared by NRC staff and submit questions in writing over the Internet. 

Interested members of the public have to register by following the instructions in the meeting 

notice in order to participate. Webinar seats must be reserved by March 18. All webinar details 

and system requirements can be found in the public meeting notice.
###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.
### SUBCHAPTER I—DOMESTIC SUPPLY AVAILABILITY
#### In the Matter of Alfred L. Rose et al., Appellants. Williams Auction Sales Corp., Respondent.

Order unanimously modified by increasing the rental value to $32,000 and as so modified affirmed, with costs to the appellants. Ho opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
### subpart i—interagency coordination of activities

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 103–43, title XVIII, §1801(a)(3), June 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 192, added subpart I heading.
Exhibit 32.2




Certification Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350


by Principal Accounting Officer




In connection with the Quarterly Report of VSB Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jonathan B. Lipschitz, Vice President, Controller and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: November 9, 2010





/s/ Jonathan B. LipschitzJonathan B. LipschitzVice President, Controller and Principal Accounting Officer




A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




38
### Part C—Smallpox Emergency Personnel Protection
ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD TO HOLD PREHEARING CONFERENCE ON 

PRAIRIE ISLAND SPENT FUEL STORAGE FACILITY LICENSE RENEWAL

An Atomic Safety and Licensing Board will hold a “prehearing conference” Nov. 8 and 9 to 

hear arguments on the Prairie Island Indian Community’s standing and admissibility of their 

contentions challenging the license renewal application for the Independent Spent Fuel Storage 

Installation (ISFSI) at the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant. The plant, operated by Northern 

States Power Co., is located in Red Wing, Minn.

The conference will be held in the Devitt Courtroom of the Warren E. Burger Federal 

Building & United States Courthouse, 316 North Robert St., in St. Paul, Minn. Proceedings will 

begin at 9 a.m. each day and conclude no later than 5 p.m.

The Prairie Island Indian Community petitioned for a hearing, filing seven contentions 

challenging the Prairie Island ISFSI renewal application that Northern States Power Co. submitted 

on Oct. 20, 2011.

The Atomic Safety and Licensing Board is a quasi-judicial panel of judges independent of 

the NRC staff that conducts adjudicatory hearings in major licensing actions by the NRC. At the 

prehearing conference, only attorneys representing the petitioner, the utility and the NRC staff will 

participate. Members of the public are welcome to view the proceeding. 

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES link 

on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to 

NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 12-115 October 17, 2012
# FILED
February 5, 1999 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Cou rt Clerk IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE

STATE OF TENNESSEE ) CANNON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDR EN’S ) SERVICES, ) NO. 01A01-9806-J V-00275 Petitioner/Appellee ) v. ) HON. JOHN B. MELTON, III ) JUDGE TAMRA LEANN VIAR, ) Respondent/Appella

nt ) and ) ) JOHN FITZGERALD GROSS, ) (Present Wher

eabouts Unknown) ) and ) ) THE UNKNOWN FATHER OF ) KATELYN NICOLE V

IAR, ) (Present Wher

eabouts Unknown) ) Respondents. ) ) IN THE MATTER OF: ) KATELYN NICOLE VIAR ) Date of Birth: 9/22

/95 ) ORDER ON PETITION TO REHEAR We have reviewed the Petition to Rehear filed on behalf of the Attorney General and concl

ude that the Petition should be denied for the following

reasons. 1. The Attorney

General contends t

hat the State has pr

oved the gounds set out in T.C.A. § 36-117(g)(3)(A), th ereby justifying termination of p arental rights. We find, howev

er, that the testi

mony concer

ning the mother’ s current relationship with he

r child does not m

eet the requirem

ents of 36-117- (g)(3)(A)(i) and (iii) by clear a nd convincing ev idence. 2. The Attorney

General contends t

hat the return of the

child to the custody

of her mother presents a threat to the child’s safety. We disagree, and reference the testimony

of Lynn Law

rence, Kenneth H

azel, Lorett Q

uarcoo, Debbie2

Holder, Ann Rich

ey, Rita W

aller, Caroly

n Thomas and Da

le Peterson, all of whom have been

in personal contact w

ith the mother a

nd child. The Petition to Reh

ear is denied at the

costs of the Attorne

y General.

______________________________ William H.

Inman, Senio

r Judge

_______________________________ Houston M. Goddard, Presiding Judge

_______________________________ Herschel P. Fr

anks, Judge
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.8

                                    AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                              AMENDED AND RESTATED

                         OPTION TO PURCHASE COMMON STOCK

         THIS AMENDMENT (the "Amendment") to the Amended and Restated Option to
Purchase Common Stock (the "Option"), dated August 8, 2003, issued to
____________________ (the "Holder") to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock,
par value $.001, of Continental Southern Resources, Inc., a Nevada corporation
(the "Company"), is made and entered into February 26, 2004. Capitalized terms
not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in
the Option.


                                    RECITALS

         WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend the Option to delete
Section 3.3(a).

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises, and for
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties
hereto hereby agree as follows:

         1.       Section 3.3(a) is hereby deleted in its entirety.

         2.       Except as expressly provided herein, the Option shall remain
in full force and effect.

         3. This Amendment may be executed in counterpart, each of which shall
be deemed to be an original, and both of which together shall constitute one and
the same agreement.


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Holder and the Company have caused this
Amendment to be signed by their respective officers hereunto duly authorized,
all as of the date first written above.

                                       CONTINENTAL SOUTHERN RESOURCES, INC.


                                       By:__________________________________
                                          Name:
                                          Title:



                                       -------------------------------------
                                       [Holder]
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Bidgive International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the Report), I, James P. Walker, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  April 15, 2009 /s/James P. Walker, Jr.     Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0529 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JASSIE LAYDELL WESTERMAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 30 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 24 2023

07/24/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0529
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3413 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3413

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 1449 West Avenue in Bronx, New York, as the ``Private Isaac T. 
                         Cortes Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRIVATE ISAAC T. CORTES POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1449 West Avenue in Bronx, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Private Isaac T. Cortes Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Private 
Isaac T. Cortes Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 5, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3413

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 1449 West Avenue in Bronx, New York, as the ``Private Isaac T. 
                         Cortes Post Office''.
```
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 FORM 10-K/A
(Amendment No. 2)
 (Mark One)
 þ
    
    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the year ended December 31, 2005
 OR
 o
    
    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 Commission File No. 0-30821
 TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, INC.
  Maryland
    
    52-1526369(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or
Organization)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 275 West Street, Annapolis, MD
    
    21401(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 (410) 263-7616
   o þ
 o þ
 þ o
 o
  o þ o
 o þ
   DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
 Document
    
    Part of 10-K into which incorporatedDefinitive Proxy Statement related to registrants
    
    Part IIIAnnual Meeting of Stockholders to be held onJune 8, 2006




---



##### 



EXPLANATORY NOTE
    Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
 Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
  Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
   Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting




---



##### 



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  TeleCommunication Systems, Inc.By:
    
    /s/ Maurice B. ToséMaurice B. ToséChief Executive Officer, Presidentand Chairman of the Board
  Name
    
    Title
    
    Date/s/ Maurice B. Tosé *

Maurice B. Tosé
    
    Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of
the Board (Principal Executive Officer)
    
    May 10, 2006/s/ Thomas M. Brandt, Jr.

Thomas M. Brandt, Jr.
    
    Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer)
    
    May 10, 2006/s/ Clyde A. Heintzelman*
    
    Director
    
    May 10, 2006Clyde A. Heintzelman/s/ Richard A. Kozak *
    
    Director
    
    May 10, 2006Richard A. Kozak/s/ Weldon H. Latham*
    
    Director
    
    May 10, 2006Weldon H. Latham/s/ Byron F. Marchant*
    
    Director
    
    May 10, 2006Byron F. MarchantJames A. Bethmann
    
    Director
  
 * By:
    /s/ Thomas M. Brandt, Jr.

Thomas M. Brandt, Jr., as attorney-in-fact
    
    
    
    May 10, 2006




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 ExhibitNumbers
    
    Description23.1
    
    Consents of Experts and Counsel31.1
    
    Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 200231.2
    
    Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 200232.1
    
    Certification of the Chief
Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 200232.2
    
    Certification of the Chief
Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
#### In the Matter of William Griffin, Appellant, v Robert Dennison, as Chair of the Board of Parole, Respondent.

[820 NYS2d 670]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (McNamara, J.), entered January 13, 2006 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

*1061Petitioner is serving a prison sentence of 15 years to life following his 1988 convictions of murder in the second degree, two counts of assault in the third degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree. The charges stem from an incident wherein petitioner, in a highly intoxicated state, stabbed three fellow college students, resulting in the death of one of the victims. In October 2004, petitioner made his second appearance before the Board of Parole and his request for parole release was denied. Following an unsuccessful administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding. Supreme Court dismissed the petition and this appeal ensued.

It is well settled that “[i]n reviewing an inmate’s request for parole release, the Board must consider various statutory factors (see Executive Law § 259-i [1]; [2] [c] [A]), but it is not required to give equal weight to or discuss every factor it considered in reaching its discretionary determination” *(Matter of Parmes v Travis,*17 AD3d 885, 886 [2005]). A review of the record herein reveals that although it placed emphasis on the nature of the offense, the Board considered the relevant statutory factors, including petitioner’s lack of criminal history, his positive educational and institutional accomplishments, good disciplinary record, expressions of remorse and plans upon release. Inasmuch as the determination resulted from an exercise of the Board’s discretion based upon the statutory guidelines, and there being no showing that the determination was affected by “irrationality bordering on impropriety,” further judicial review is precluded *(Matter of Silmon v Travis,*95 NY2d 470, 476 [2000] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; *see*Executive Law § 259-i [5]; *see also Matter of Manley v New York State Bd. of Parole,*21 AD3d 1209, 1209 [2005], *lv denied*6 NY3d 702 [2005]; *Matter of Mendez v New York State Bd. of Parole,*20 AD3d 742, 743 [2005]). Petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his argument that the determination was based upon an informal executive policy to deny parole release to all violent felons, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Carpinello, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
#### PRENTISS et al. v. AMERICAN UNIVERSITY et al. WRATHER et al. v. AMERICAN UNIVERSITY et al.

Nos. 11942, 11943.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued May 18 1954

Decided June 10, 1954.

Petition for Rehearing Denied July 21,1954.

Messrs. Harry L. Walker and John Hampton Baumgartner, Jr., Assistant Corporation Counsel, Washington, D. C., for the District of Columbia, with whom Messrs. Vernon E. West, Corporation Counsel, Leo A. Rover, U. S. Atty., Chester H. Gray, Principal Asst. Corporation Counsel, Oliver Gasch, Principal Asst. U. S. Atty., and Milton D. Korman, Asst. Corporation Counsel, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellants Prentiss et al.

Mr. James C. Wilkes, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Norman M. Glasgow and George A. Glasgow, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellants Wrather et al.

Messrs. E. F. Colladay and D. C. Colla-day, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. James R. Stoner, Washington, D. C., was 0n the briefs, for appellee The American University. Mr. Calvin G. Dworshak, Washington, D. C., entered an appearanCe for appellee American University.

,Messrs. Paul B. Cromelm and Thomas M. Raysor, Washington, D. C., for apWebb Hayes National Traingchool fQr Deaconesses and Missionaries

Mr. Andrew T. Altmann, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Clyde D. Garrett, Washington, D. C., was on the briefs, for appellee Equitable Life Ins. Co.

Before EDGERTON, WILBUR K. FILLER, and BAZELON, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam.

An order of the Zoning Commission of the District of Columbia rezonod the campus of The American University from residential *“A”*to residential *“A*restricted”. The immediate effect of the order was to prevent the building on the campus of a hospital to be maintained in connection with a School of Nursing.

*283
      **“The governmental power to interfere by zoning regulations with the general rights of the land owner by restricting the character of his use, is not unlimited, and. other questions aside, such restriction cannot be imposed if it does not bear a substantial relation to the public health,, safety, morals, or general welfare.” Nectow v. Cambridge, 277 U.S. 183, 188, 48 S.Ct. 447, 448, 72 L.Ed. 842. In the District Court, Judge Holtzoff found that the restriction which the rezoning order would impose on the University’s right to use its land did not meet this requirement. He therefore found the order unconstitutional, and set it aside, as taking the University’s property without due process of law. 1 D.C., 113 F.Supp. 389. We think he was clearly right. The judgment of the District Court is

Affirmed.
### §5903. Recognition with respect to particular claims

(a) In General.—The Secretary may recognize any individual for the preparation, presentation, and prosecution of any particular claim for benefits under any of the laws administered by the Secretary if—

(1) such individual has certified to the Secretary that no fee or compensation of any nature will be charged any individual for services rendered in connection with such claim; and

(2) such individual has filed with the Secretary a power of attorney, executed in such manner and in such form as the Secretary may prescribe.

(b) Suspension.—An individual recognized under this section shall be subject to the provisions of section 5904(b) of this title on the same basis as an individual recognized under section 5904(a) of this title.

(Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1238, §3403; renumbered §5903, Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §402(b)(1), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 238; Pub. L. 102–83, §4(a)(1), (b)(1), (2)(E), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 403–405; Pub. L. 109–461, title I, §101(a)(3), Dec. 22, 2006, 120 Stat. 3407.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–461 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, and added subsec. (b).

1991—Pub. L. 102–40 renumbered section 3403 of this title as this section.

Pub. L. 102–83, §4(b)(1), (2)(E), substituted "Secretary" for "Administrator" in introductory provisions and wherever appearing in pars. (1) and (2).

Pub. L. 102–83, §4(a)(1), substituted "administered by the Secretary" for "administered by the Veterans' Administration" in introductory provisions.