T: 20 2 May 20, Lisa P. J a Adminis t Environ m 1101A E Ariel Ri o 1200 Pe n Washin g BY F Dear This 7607(d)( Francisc o reconsid e “Compl e Because b elieve t h Assu m Notice o r to com m Contr § 112(c) ( emissio n under § 1 § 129 fo r enumera t enumera t § 112(d) ( EPA has when E P for all th e EPA control th unlawfu l for whic h

1625 MA S 2 .667.4500 2011

a ckson trato r m ental Prote E PA Headqu a o s Building n nsylvania A g ton, DC 20 4 F IRST CLA S

Administra t is a petition 7)(B). The p o , Californi a e r certain as p e tion of Req u

this notice i h at a petitio n

m ing that § rprovide an y ent on this n

r ary to EPA ( 6). In parti c n s of the haz a 1 12(d)(2) or rthe listed c a t es. Thus m t ed pollutan t ( 2) or (d)(4) set standar d P A sets stan d

e listed HA P has argued i h e § 112(c)( l and arbitrar h it now cla i

S SACHUSETT F: 202.66 7 ction Agen c arters A ve., NW 4 60 S S MAIL A N
t or Jackson: under Clea n p arty submit t a94105, (41 p ects of the u irement To s not an acti n for recons i 307(d) does y opportuni t n otice. ’s claim in t h c ular, EPA h ardous air p o (d)(4). Firs a tegories, it m any of the l i

t s, as the Cl e for all the s o d s for only s o d ards under § P s emitted b y i n some ind i 6 ) pollutant s r y and, in a n i ms credit u n

S AVENUE N W 7 .2356 E: c y

N D EMAIL

n Air Act (“ C t ing this pet i 5 ) 977-550 0 final action Promulgat e on subject t o i deration is n

apply how e t y for public

h e notice, th h as not assu r o llutants en u t, although E h a s not set s i sted source s e an Air Act r o urces in th e o me of the s § 112(d)(2) o y the catego r i vidual rules s or are surr o n y event, EP A n der § 112(c A LASKA CALI NORTH W

W , SUITE 7 dcoffice@ear C AA” or “th i tion is Sierr 0 . By this pe t

taken at 76 F e Emission S o Clean Air A n ecessary a n

e ver, EPA d i

comment o n
h e agency ha r ed that sou r u merated in § E PA has set s tandards fo r s are not sub j r equires. S e e categories ources with i o r (d)(4) for r ies listed p u that its sta n o gates for th A did not e v )(6). FORNIA FLORIDA W EST ROCKY MOU

02 WASHIN thjustice.org h e Act”) § 3 0 r a Club, 85 S t ition, Sierr a F ed. Reg. 1 5 S tandards” ( “

Act § 307( d n d submits o n i d not propo s n it. Accor d

a s not compl e r ces account i § 112(c)(6) a some stand a rthe polluta n bj ect to stan d e cond, EPA h

and subcat e i n some cat e a category, u rsuant to §

n dards for oth h ose polluta n v en make th e MID-PACIFIC N NTAIN WASHING T

GTON, DC 2 W: www.e 0 7(d)(7)(B), S econd St., 2 aClub requ e 5 308 (Mar. 2
“ Section 11 2 d ), Sierra Cl u

ne only as a

s e its Sectio n d ingly, it wa

e ted its obli g ing for nine t are subject t ards under e i a nts that § 1 1 d ards with r e

has not set s e gories liste d e gories. Thi r

EPA has n o 112(c)(6). h er pollutan t n ts. Those c l e m in many o N ORTHEAST NOR T T ON, DC INTERN A

0036 arthjustice.o 42 U.S.C. § 2 nd Floor, S a e sts that you 2 1, 2011), ti t 2 (c)(6) Noti c u b does not

precaution.

n 112(c)(6) s impractic a

g ations und e t y percent o f t o standards i ther § 112 o 1 2(c)(6) e spect to the s tandards un d . Specifica l rd, althoug h o t set standar

t s effectivel y l aims are o f the categ o T HERN ROCKIES A TIONAL

rg § an t led c e”).

able

e r f the

o r
der l ly, h r ds

y

o riesIn short, EPA’s claim to have completed it s obligations under § 112(c)(6) is unlawful and arbitrary. Because this objection is of central relevance and could not have been raised during a period for public comment (which did not exist) , you must reconsider th e notice under Clean Air Act § 307(d)(7)(B).