Pesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 

# Pesticide Data Program Annual Summary Calendar Year 2005

United States Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Marketing Service

Science and Technology Programs 

## Visit our Web site at: www.ams.usda.gov/pdp

November 2006Pesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 United States Department of Agriculture
Marketing and Regulatory Programs
Agricultural Marketing Service
1400 Independence Ave. Washington, DC 20250 

## November 2006

To the Reader:
I am pleased to present the Pesticide Data Program’s (PDP) 15 th

## Annual Summary, which includes data for calendar year 2005. PDP data continue to demonstrate that the Nation’s food suppl y is among the safest in the world.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture im plemented PDP in May 1991. Since then, PDP has tested a wide range of commod ities in the U.S. food supply. Using a rigorous statistical approach to sampling and the most current laboratory methods, PDP has tested both fresh and processed fruit and vegetables , grains and grain products, milk and dairy products, beef, pork, poultry, drinking water, bottled water, and groundwater (initiated in 2006) for pesticide residues.

PDP data are essential for the im plementation of the 1996 Food Quality Protection Act, which direct s the Secretary of Agriculture to collect pesticide residue data on foods most likely consum ed by infants and children. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) us es PDP data as a critical component of dietary assessments of pesticide expos ure. The extensive and reliable PDP results provide realistic e xposure information to the EPA assessment process.
PDP is a partnership with cooperating St ate agencies responsible for sample collection and analysis. Tw elve States participated in the program during 2005: California, Colorado, Florida, Maryla nd, Michigan, Minneso ta, Montana, New York, Ohio, Texas, Washington, and Wi sconsin. Sound conclusions about our food supply can be drawn from PDP result s because together the sampling States represent all regions of the country and over half the Nation’s population.
The format of this Annual Summary is intended to provide the reader with thorough and accurate information. A detachable form is included following this letter for your comments and suggesti ons on how we can further improve this summary.
Sincerely,

Lloyd C. Day Administrator

AMS-Agricultural Marketing Service
An Equal Opportunity Provider and EmployerPesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 

# Contents Page No.


## Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................... ................vii

Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. .................ix
Acronyms and Abbreviations ..................................................................................................... ..........xii

Section I--Introduction ........................................................................................................................1

Section II-- Sampling Operations .......................................................................................................4 Background.................................................................................................................... ............4 Fresh and Processed Fruit and Vegetables ................................................................................6 Grains: Soybeans and Wheat Grain...........................................................................................9 Dairy: Milk and Heavy Cream ................................................................................................12 Pork.......................................................................................................................... ................13 Bottled Water and Municipal Drinking Water ........................................................................13

Section III--Laboratory Operations .................................................................................................15 Overview...................................................................................................................... ............15 Fresh and Processed Fruit and Vegetables ..............................................................................15 Soybeans and Wheat ........................................................................................................... ....17 Soybean Rust/Aphid Special Survey .......................................................................................17 Milk and Heavy Cream.......................................................................................................... ..17 Pork (Adipose and Muscle) ..................................................................................................... 17 Bottled Water................................................................................................................. ..........18 Drinking Water ................................................................................................................ ........18 Quality Assu rance Program..................................................................................................... 18

Section IV--Database Management ..................................................................................................20 Electronic Data Pathway....................................................................................................... ...20 Data Reporting................................................................................................................ .........22

Section V--Sample Results and Discussion ......................................................................................22 Sample Results................................................................................................................ .........22 Fresh vs. Processed........................................................................................................... .......23 Import vs. Domestic Residue Comparisons.............................................................................26 National Estimates ............................................................................................................ .......27 Soybean Rust/Aphid Results ...................................................................................................2 7 Postharvest Applications ...................................................................................................... ...27 Environmental Contaminants ..................................................................................................27 Multiple Pesticide Residue Detections ....................................................................................28 Tolerance Violations.......................................................................................................... ......28 Bottled Water Results......................................................................................................... .....29 Drinking Water Results ........................................................................................................ ...30 Synopsis...................................................................................................................... .............31

iiiPesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 

# Figures and Tables

Figures Page No.

1 PDP Program Operations Support and Data Users ...........................................................2 2 Program Participants ........................................................................................................ ..3 3 Commodity Origin ............................................................................................................ .8 4 Origin of Selected Fresh Commodities: Eggplant, Grapes and Winter Squash ...............10 5 Number of Samples Collected and Grower States for Soybeans -- Crop Year 2004.......11 6 Number of Samples Collected and Grower States for Wheat -- Crop Year 2004............12 7 Location of Pork Sample Collection Sites........................................................................14 8 Location of Drinking Water Collection Sites at Community Water Systems, 2005........15 9 PDP Data Pathway ...........................................................................................................2 1 10 Seasonality of Pesticides in Finished Drinking Water Samples.......................................32

Tables

1 PDP Commodity Collection Schedule for 2005 ................................................................5 2 Distribution of Samples Collected and Analyzed by Each Participating State..................7 3 Number of Samples Analyzed and Summary of Residues Detected by Commodity ......24 4 Selected Residue Comparisons for Fresh and Processed Commodities...........................25 5 Origin of Bottled Water Samples and Number of Residues Detected .............................30

Appendices A-L

Appendix A Commodity History Appendix B Distribution of Residues by Pesticide in Fruit and Vegetables Appendix C Distribution of Residues by Pesticide in Soybeans Appendix D Distribution of Residues by Pesticide in Soybean Rust/Aphid Special Survey Appendix E Distribution of Residues by Pesticide in Wheat Appendix F Distribution of Residues by Pesticide in Milk Appendix G Distribution of Residues by Pesticide in Heavy Cream Appendix H Distribution of Residues by Pesticide in Pork Appendix I Distribution of Residues by Pesticide in Bottled Water Appendix J Distribution of Residues by Pesticide in Drinking Water Appendix K Sample Origin by State or Country Appendix L Import vs. Domestic Pesticide Residue Comparisons Appendix M National Estimates for Concentration Percentiles vs. Tolerance Appendix N Cumulative Distributions of Residues for Selected Pesticide/Commodity Pairs Appendix O Number of Pesticides Detected per Sample Appendix P Fruit and Vegetable Samples Reported to FDA as Exceeding the Tolerance or Without Established Tolerance

vPesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 

# Acknowledgements
The States participating in the Pesticide Data Program (PDP) deserve special recognition for their contributions to the program. The dedication and flexibility of sample collectors allow the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) to adjust sampling protocols to respond to changing trends in commodity distribution andavailability. PDP acknowledges the contributions of the State laboratories, U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) AMS National Science Laboratory, th e Grain Inspection,Packers, and Stockyards Administration Laboratory in providing tes ting services to theprogram, and the National Agricultural Statistics Service for providi ng statistical support. PDP also acknowledges the exceptional support of the Health Effects Di vision staff of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, in helping set the direction for PDP.
Data presented in this report were collected and processed through the efforts of the following organizations:

Program Administration
Agricultural Marketing Service Science and Technology Programs 1400 Independence Ave., SW. South Building, Mail Stop 0222 Washington, DC 20250
Deputy Administrator Science & Technology Programs: Robert L. Epstein (202) 720-5231, Facsimile (202) 720-6496
Monitoring Programs Office 8609 Sudley Rd., Suite 206 Manassas, VA 20110 Director: Martha Lamont (703) 330-2300 x17, Facsimile (703) 369-0678
Deputy Director: Diana Haynes (703) 330-2300 x34, Facsimile (703) 369-0678 Electronic-mail Address:
amsmpo.data@usda.gov

Web Site:
http://www.ams.usda.gov/pdp
Participating State Agencies
California Department of Food and Agriculture California Department of Pesticide Regulation Colorado Department of Agriculture Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Maryland Department of Agriculture Michigan Department of Agriculture Minnesota Department of Agriculture Montana Department of Agriculture New York Department of Agriculture and Markets Ohio Department of Agriculture Texas Department of Agriculture Washington State Department of Agriculture Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade, and Consumer Protection
Participating Laboratories
California Department of Food and Agriculture Division of Inspection Services Center for Analytical Chemistry 3292 Meadowview Rd. Sacramento, CA 95832
Colorado Department of Agriculture Inspection & Consumer Services Division Laboratory Section 2331 West 31st Ave. Denver, CO 80211-3859
Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Chemical Residue Laboratory Building #3 3125 Conner Blvd. Tallahassee, FL 32399-1650

viiPesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 

## Ohio Department of Agriculture Consumer Analytical Laboratory 8995 East Main St. Reynoldsburg, OH 43068
Texas Department of Agriculture Pesticide Laboratory 1500 Research Parkway, Ste. B100 College Station, TX 77845
United States Department of Agriculture Grain Inspection, Packers & Stockyards Administration Technical Services Division 10383 North Ambassador Dr. Kansas City, MO 64153-1394
United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Marketing Service National Science Laboratory 801 Summit Crossing Pl. Gastonia, NC 28054
Washington State Department of Agriculture Chemical and Hop Laboratory 21 N. 1st Ave., Ste. 106 Yakima, WA 98902 Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Chemical Residue Laboratory 500 3rd St., NW Winter Haven, FL 33881
Michigan Department of Agriculture Laboratory Division 1615 South Harrison Rd. East Lansing, MI 48823-5224
Minnesota Department of Agriculture 601 N. Robert St. St. Paul, MN 55155-2531
Montana Department of Agriculture Laboratory Bureau McCall Hall, Montana State University Bozeman, MT 59717
New York Department of Agriculture and Markets Food Laboratory 1220 Washington Ave. State Office Campus, Bldg. 7 Albany, NY 12235

viiiPesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 

## This summary of results for 2005 is the 15 th 

## Annual Summary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Pe sticide Data Program (PDP). In 1991, USDA was charged with designing and implementing a program to collect data on pesticid e residues in food. The responsibility for this program was given to USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS).
Program Operations: AMS, through its Monitoring Programs Office (MPO), oversees the planning and policy development for PDP.MPO meets regularly with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and other stakeholders (e.g., industry and grower groups) to establish program prio rities and direction. Participating States have a prominent role in program planning activi ties and policy establishment, particularly policies relating to Quality Assurance (QA). The USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) provides sampling support to PD P and statistically reliable data on chemical usage at the State level and collects economic data that link chemical usage with economic characteristics.

Data Uses: PDP data are used primarily by EPA to prepare realistic pesticide dietary exposure assessments as part of its ongoing effort to implement the 1996 Food QualityProtection Act (FQPA). PDP provides highquality data on residues in food, particularly foods most likely consumed by infants and children, including minor crops. Minor crops are those grown on 300,000 acres or less in the U.S. – for example, many fruit and vegetable crops are defined as minor crops. PDP data are used in pesticide re-registration activities, in accordance with FQPA requirements.
PDP data are also used by the U.S. Food andDrug Administration (FDA), USDA’s Economic Research Service (ERS) and Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS), participatingStates, academic institutions, chemical manufacturers, environmental interest groups, food safety organizations, and groups within the private sector represen ting food producers. PDP data are used by the U.S. Government and agricultural community to examine pesticide residue issues that may affect good agricultural practices relating to integrated pest management objectives and U.S. trade, particularly in the competitive global market. PDP additionally provides support for USDA’s participation in the Codex Alimentarius Commission.

Risk Assessment: In estimating the potential risks of consumption of pesticide residues from food, EPA uses a step-wise tiered approach. As afirst step, EPA may use a conservative, worstcase scenario and assume that a pesticide is applied to the fullest extent permitted by the pesticide label; that is, on every acre of each approved crop at the maximum rate and frequency allowed. EPA may also assume that residues on treated crops are present at the maximum allowable level. Exposure estimates based on such assumptions are likely to significantly exceed actual exposure. When an initial assessment indicates a potential risk, EPA refines its assessment using more realistic exposure data. Refinements may include the use of additional data such as: (1) the percent of a crop treated with a pestic ide; (2) studies of the effects of washing, c ooking, processing, and storage; and (3) residue monitoring data. During the refinements of this exposure assessment, PDP data can be pivotal. PDP sampling procedures were designed to capture residues in the food supply as close as possible to the time of consumption. PDP concentrates its efforts to provide realistic pesticid e residue data on foods that are most often co nsumed by infants and children and incorporates recommendations made in 1993 by the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) in its report “ Pesticides in the Diets of Infants and Children.”
Participants: In 2005, sampling and/or testing program operations were carried out with the support of 12 States: California, Colorado, Florida, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota,

ix 

# Executive SummaryPesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005

x 

## Montana, New York, Ohio, Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin. Grain sampling was performed by USDA’s Federal Grain Inspection Service (FGIS) and pork sampling by USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS). Two Federal laboratories also provided testing services: USDA’s AMS National Science Laboratory and USDA’s Grain Inspection, Packers, and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA) Laboratory. Participating water utilities provided drinking water samples which were tested by the Colorado, Montana, and New York State laboratories. Bottled water samples were collected at food distribution centers and tested by the Minnesota laboratory. MPO is responsible for admini stering the program,coordinating sampling actions, directing technical performance issues and quality assurance measures, and managing database activities.
Sampling: PDP commodity sampling is based on a rigorous statistical design which ensures that the data are reliable for use in exposure assessments and that they can be used to draw various conclusions ab out the Nation’s food supply. Pesticides and commodities included each year in PDP are selected based on EPA data needs and on information about the types and amounts of food consumed by infants and children. Fruit and vegetable, dairy, and bottled water samples collected by each of the 10 sampling States (Califor nia, Colorado, Florida, Maryland, Michigan, Ne w York, Ohio, Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin) are apportioned according to that State’s population. Samples are randomly chosen close to the time and point of consumption (i.e., distribution centers rather than at farmgate) and re flect what is typically available to the consumer throughout the year. Samples are selected without regard to country of origin, variety, or organic labeling. The monthly sampling rate is 62 samples percommodity, except for highly seasonal commodities. For seasonal commodities, sampling rates are adjusted to reflect market availability. Sampling rates for grain and meat are based on production. Results: During 2005, PDP tested fresh and processed fruit and vegetables, soybeans, wheat, milk, heavy cream, pork, bottled water, and drinking water for vari ous insecticides, herbicides, fungicides, and growth regulators. Of the 14,749 total samples collected and analyzed, 10,154 were fruit and vegetable commoditiesincluding apples, cantaloupe, cauliflower, eggplant, grapes, grapefruit, fresh and frozen green beans, lettuce, oranges and orange juice, pears, fresh and dried plums (prunes), strawberries, watermelon, and winter squash. PDP also tested 668 soybean (plus 306 for a soybean rust/aphid special survey), 674 wheat, 746 milk, 369 heavy cream, 704 pork, 378 bottled water, and 750 drinking water samples. Excluding drinking water, approximately 84 percent of all samples tested were from U.S. sources, 14 percent were imports, 1 percent was of mixed origin, and approximately 1 percentwas of unknown origin. Approximately 21 percent of the orange juice samples were of mixed national origin.
Overall, 73 percent of fr esh fruit and vegetables and 61 percent of processed fruit and vegetables showed detectable residu es. More residues were detected in fresh produce than in processed products and grains. Resi dues detected in dairy products and pork samples were primarily low level residues of unavoidable environmental contaminants, including DDE p,p’ and dieldrin. Additionally, low levels of diphenylamine were detected in dairy products.
Excluding drinking water, 34 percent of samples tested contained no detectable pesticides [parent compound and metabolite(s) combined], 30 percent contained 1 pesticide, and 36 percent contained more than 1 pesticide. Low levels of environmental contaminants were detected in cantaloupe, cauliflower, green beans, heavy cream, lettuce, milk, pork, watermelon, and winter squash at concentrations well below levels that trigger regulatory actions.Pesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 

## water. The majority of pesticides, metabolites, and isomers included in the PDP testing profiles were not detected. None of the detections in the finished water samples exceeded established EPA Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCL) or Health Advisory (HA) levels or established Freshwater Aquatic Organism (FAO) criteria.

Data Availability: PDP continuously strives to improve methods for the collection, testing, and reporting of data. These data are freely available to EPA and other Federal and State agencies charged with regulating and setting policies on the use of pesticides. They are also available to all stakeh olders by hard copy, Internet, or custom reports generated by MPO. Additional copies of the PDP Annual Summary may be obtained by calling MPO at (703) 330- 2300 or by mailing the form provided at the end of this report. This publication, the PDP database file for 2005, and annual summaries and database files fo r previous years are available on the PDP Website at http:// www.ams.usda.gov/pdp

.

xi 

## Excluding samples for which no tolerances are set (bottled water and drinking water), residues exceeding the tolerance were detected in 0.2 percent of the 13,621 samples tested in 2005 – 25 samples with 1 residue each. A tolerance is the maximum amount of a pesticide residue allowable on a raw agricultural commodity. Established tolerances are listed in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 180. Residues with no estab lished tolerance were found in 4.2 percent of the samples (570 sampleswith 1 residue each, and 2 samples with 2 residues each). In most cases, these residues were detected at very low levels and some residues may have resulted from spray drift or crop rotations. PDP communicates these findings to FDA when they are reported by testing laboratories.
In finished drinking water, PDP detected low levels (measured in part s per trillion) of some pesticides, primarily widely used herbicides. Forty-eight different resi dues were detected in the untreated intake wate r and 43 in the treatedPesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005
xii 

# Acronyms and Abbreviations

% C.V. Percent Coefficient of Variation AMS Agricultural Marketing Service BQL Below Quantifiable Level CDFA California Department of Food and Agriculture EMRL Extraneous Maximum Residue Limit EPA Environmental Protection Agency ERS Economic Research Service ESA Ethane Sufonic Acid e-SIF Electronic-Sample Information Form FAO Freshwater Aquatic Organism FAPAS Food Analysis Performance Assessment Scheme FAS Foreign Agricultural Service FDA Food and Drug Administration FGIS Federal Grain Inspection Service FSIS Food Safety and Inspection Service FQPA Food Quality Protection Act GC Gas Chromatography GIPSA Grain Inspection, Packers, and Stockyards Administration GLP Good Laboratory Practices HA Health Advisory HPLC High Performance Liquid Chromatography LC Liquid Chromatography LIB Laboratory Information Bulletin LOD Limit of Detection LOQ Limit of Quantitation MCL Maximum Contaminant Level MPO Monitoring Programs Office MRL Maximum Residue Limit MRM Multiresidue Methods MS Mass Spectrometry NAS National Academy of Sciences NASS National Agricultural Statistics Service NSL National Science Laboratory OA Oxanilic AcidPesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005
xiii 

## PAM Pesticide Analytical Manual PDP Pesticide Data Program ppb parts per billion ppm parts per million ppt parts per trillion PT Proficiency Testing QA Quality Assurance QAO Quality Assurance Officer QAU Quality Assurance Unit QC Quality Control RDE Remote Data Entry SIF Sample Information Form SOP Standard Operating Procedure SPE Solid Phase Extraction SSL Secure Sockets Layer TPM Technical Program Manager USDA United States Department of Agriculture USGS United States Geological SurveyPesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 1 

# I. Introduction

The Pesticide Data Program (PDP), which was initiated in 1991 to collect data on pesticide residues in food, now has an important role in the implementation of the 1996 Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA). This law directs the Secretary of Agriculture to collect pesticide residue data on commodities most frequently consumed by infants an d children. PDP data are used primarily by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to assess dietary exposure during the review of the safety of existing pesticide tolerances (Maximum Residue Limits).

Because PDP collects data on food commodities primarily for exposure assessment, program operations differ markedly from those followed by regulatory monitoring programs for tolerance enforcement. PDP samples are collected closer to the point of consumption and are prepared emulating consumer practices. Sampling is based on EP A data needs and does not impede commodity di stribution. Laboratory operations are designed to achieve the lowest detectable levels rather than quick sample turnaround. As a dietary risk assessment support program, PDP focuses its pesticide testing on registered uses for the commodities in the program rather than screening for all potential illegal uses.
Figure 1(a) illustrates PDP program policy development and planning operations. Primary contributors to these activities include the participating States, EPA, USDA’s National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), and additional stakeholders including industry andgrower groups. Figure 1(b) depicts PDP primary data users including EPA, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), USDA’s Economic Research Service (ERS) and Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS), participating States, academic institutions, chemical manufacturers, environmental interest groups, food safety organizations, and groups within the privatesector representing food producers. Additionally, other Federal, St ate and foreign government agencies and industry have used PDP data to promote the export of U.S. commodities to international markets, and the Codex Alimentarius Committee on Pesticides Residues has requested information on PDP methodology for detecting residues as well as data profiles.
In 2005, sampling services were provided by 10 States (California, Colorado, Florida, Maryland,Michigan, New York, Ohio, Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin); the USDA Federal Grain Inspection Service (FGIS) ; and the USDA Food Safety Inspection Service (FSIS). Additionalsampling services were provided by participating drinking water facility personnel in nine States (California, Florida, Louisiana, Michigan,North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Washington) . Laboratory services were provided by the States of California,Colorado, Florida, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, New York, Ohio, Texas, and Washington; the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) National Science Laboratory (NSL); and the Grain Inspection, Packers, and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA) Laboratory. The AMSMonitoring Programs Office (MPO) is responsible for overall management of PDP.
Figure 2 shows the States that participate in program sampling and/or testing as well as the States in their direct distribution network. Together, these States represent about 50 percent of the Nation's population and all 4 census regions of the U.S. These States also represent major producers of fruit and vegetables in the U.S. 

# Pesticide Data Program (PDP) Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005
This summary consists of the following sections : (I.) Introduction, (II.) Sampling Operations, (III.) Laboratory Operations, (IV.) Database Manage ment, and (V.) Sample Results and DiscussionPesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 2 

## Figure 1. PDP Program Operations Support and Data Users. This figure illustrates (a) agencies/ groups that support PDP program policy and planning activities, and (b) agencies/groups that use PDP data. 

# Industry and Grower Groups

Academic Institutions Other Government

Agencies

Agricultural Industry CODEX

Chemical Manufacturers,

Environmental Interest

Groups, Food Safety Organizations (a) PDP Policy and Pl anning Contributions

(b) PDP Data Users 

# Participating States

National Agricultural Statistics Service Environmental Protection

Agency

Food and Drug Administration Participating States Environmental Protection

Agency

Foreign Agricultural Service Economic Research ServicePesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 3 

## AMS works closely with EPA to select commodities and pesticides for testing and in the selection of drinking water sites. Commodities selected are those repres enting the highest U.S.consumption, with an emphasis on foods consumed by infants and children. Appendix A provides a list of commodities tested by PDP from the beginning of the program in 1991 through 2006.
Fruit and vegetable samples are collected atterminal markets and large chain store distribution centers from which food commodities are supplied to supermarkets and grocery stores. Sampling at these locations allows for residue measurements that include pesticides applied during crop production and those applied after harvest (such as fungicides and growth regulators) and takes into account residue degradation while food commodities are in storage. Participation as a PDP sampling site is voluntary, which sets it apart from State and Federal enforcement programs. In 2005, more than 700 sites granted access and provided information, including site volume data, to sample collectors. This voluntary cooperation is important to PDP and makes it possible to adjust sampling protocols in response to fluctuations in food di stribution and production.
Pesticides screened by PDP include those with current registered uses and compounds for which toxicity data and preliminary estimates of dietary exposure indicate the need for more extensive residue data. PDP also monitors Nevada Idaho Wyoming

New Mexico

Hawaii Alaska V i r

g

i nia 

### Delaware Connecticut Massachusetts Michigan Vermont

New Jersey



## Figure 2. Program Participants. During 2005, AMS established coopera tive agreements with 12 States to sample and/or test PDP commodities. State laboratori es are responsible for anal yzing fresh and processed fruit and vegetable samples and drinking water samples. The Federal laboratory in Gastonia, North Carolina, analyzes meat, poultry, and dairy products, and the Fed eral laboratory in Kansas City, Missouri, analyzes whole and processed grain products. States that do not participate in PDP’s sampling program but are in the direct distribution networks of the participating States are also shown. New York



### Texas California

Oklahoma Washington

Wisconsin



### Florida

Participating State Minnesota

States where produce is directly marketed from Participating States
Location of Participating State (white stars)/Federal (black stars) Laboratories 

### Maryland Colorado Ohio MontanaPesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 4 

## pesticides for which EPA has instituted modified use directions (i.e., redu ced application rates or frequency) as part of risk management activities.The following appendices list the specific pesticides tested in the program: fruit and vegetables (Appendix B), soybeans (Appendix C), soybean rust/aphid special survey (Appendix D), wheat (Appendix E), milk (Appendix F), heavy cream (Appendix G), pork (Appendix H), bottled water (Appendix I), and drinking water (Appendix J). 

# II. Sampling Operations

♦ Background
The goal of the PDP sampling program is to obtain a statistically defe nsible representation of the U.S. food supply. PD P data reflect actual pesticide residue exposure from food. Using a rigorous statistical de sign, PDP has developed extensive procedures to ensure that samples are randomly selected from the national food distribution system and re flect what is typically available to the consumer.
Fruit, vegetables, da iry products, and bottled water are randomly collected by trained State inspectors at terminal markets and large chain store distribution centers throughout the country. Surrogate or “proxy” sites (retail markets) are occasionally used to collect these samples when the commodity of interest is unavailable at a terminal market or distribution center. In these instances, the commodity is selected in the rear storage area of the retail facility so that possible contamination by the consumer is eliminated and to allow capture of sample information from the product boxes. In 2005, approximately 7 percent of fruit, vegetable, and dairy products were collected at proxy sites. The commodities most often collected at proxy sites included milk, orange juice, heavy cream, and frozen green beans. Most of the bottled water samples were collected at proxy sites (re fer to “Bottled Water and Drinking Water” sec tion for details on this special collection criteria).
Whole grain samples are collected from trains, trucks, and barges bytrained USDA FGIS inspectors. Drinking water samples are collected by trained personnel at individual water treatment facilities at selected sites across the country. At these locations, information is usually available about the identity and origin of the sample. Sample information is captured at the time of sample collection for inclusion in PDP files.
PDP sample origin data identify the State or country where the commodity was produced. A comparison of PDP sample origin data to State production and import data by USDA’s NASS shows that PDP sampling is representative of the U.S. food supply. PDP sampling operations are adjusted according to product availability. The number of fruit, vegetable, dairy, and bottled water samples collected in each participating State is determined by State population. The number and location of collected grain and pork samples are determined by annual domestic production figures. For drinking water, each local watershed has it s own unique characteristics; therefore, sample collection for this commodity is not intended to reflect national trends. In this case, PDP collects samples in areas where it is known that targeted pesticides are heavily used. The quarterly collection schedule for all 2005 commodities is shown in Table 1.
PDP State sample collectors are trained to adhere to detailed program Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) that pr ovide criteria for site selection and specific instructions for sampleselection, shipping and handling, and chain-ofcustody. SOPs are updated as needed and serve as a technical reference in conducting program sampling reviews to ensure that program goals and objectives are met. SOPs for PDP sampling are available on the Internet at www.ams.usda. gov/pdp

. Fruit, vegetable, dairy, and bottled watersamples are packed in heavy-duty, temperaturecontrolled containers. Samples are shipped the same day as collection by overnight delivery to ensure that the selected commodities maintain their original integrity until they are received atPesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 5 

## Table 1. PDP Commodity Collection Schedule for 2005. Samples are most often collected for a 2-year time period. Commodities are initiated or terminated in different quarters of the year, so that new commodities are not brought into th e program all at the same time. This table illustrates time ranges for the listed commoditie s. See Appendix A for the complete PDP commodity history from May 1991 through December 2006. ** Soybeans were collected in the 2004 Crop Year, Oct 2004-Aug 2005. Soybeans were also collected for the soybean rust/aphid special survey Oct-Dec 2005. Commodity Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec End Date
Apples Dec-05
Cantaloupe Sep-05

Cauliflower Sep-06 Cream, heavy Dec-05 Eggplant Dec-06 Grapefruit Dec-06 Grapes Dec-05 Green Beans, Fresh Mar-05 Green Beans, Frozen Dec-05

Lettuce Dec-05

Milk Dec-05 Orange Juice Sep-06 Oranges Dec-05

Pears Sep-05
Plums, Fresh* Dec-06 Plums, Dried (prunes)* Dec-06 Pork, Adipose/Muscle Jun-05 Soybean Grain** Dec-05
Strawberries Dec-05
Water, Bottled Dec-06
Water, Finished Ongoing
Water, Untreated Ongoing

Watermelon Sep-06

Wheat Grain*** Apr-06 Winter Squash Jun-06

*** Wheat was collected in the 2004 Crop Year, Oct 2004-Apr 2005 and continued for the remainder of the year for the 2005 Crop Year. * Dried plums (prunes) were collected if fresh plums were unavailable.Pesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 6 

## their respective laboratory for analysis. Frozen cold packs are included in shipping containers, when necessary, so that holding temperatures are preserved throughout transit time. Grain samples are collected in pesticide-free polyethylene bags and are shipped in canvas pouches or boxes to the laboratory where the samples are refrigerated pending analysis. Pork samples are collected inpesticide-free polyethylene bags, frozen overnight, and shipped by next-day delivery to the laboratory for analysis. Drinking water samples are collected in specially prepared bottles containing dechlorinating agents to halt any potential compound degrad ation, packed with proper cushioning and cold packs, and shipped the same day as collection to their respective laboratory by overnight delivery.
PDP Sample Information Forms (SIFs) are used for chain-of-custody and to capture informationneeded to characterize the sample. Sample collectors use the forms to record information such as: (1) State of sample collection, (2) collection date, (3) sampling site code, (4) commoditycode, and (5) testing laboratory code. Information from these five data elements is combined to form a unique PDP sample identificationnumber for each sample. Other available information about each sample is recorded also, such as collector name, the State or country of origin, product variety, production claims such as organic, and any postharvest chemical applications. An electronic SI F (e-SIF) capturing system was implemented in 2003 and continuesto be used to record relevant sample information. Refer to Section IVon Database Management for more information on the e-SIF system.

♦ Fresh and Processed Fruit and Vegetables
Of all samples collected and analyzed in 2005, 69 percent (10,154 of 14,749) were fruit and vegetables, including fr esh and processed products. The fresh commodities collected for PDP were apples, cantaloupe, cauliflower, eggplant, grapes, grapefruit, green beans, lettuce, oranges, pears, plums, strawberries, watermelon, and winter squash. The processed commodities included frozen green beans, ready-to-serve and frozen orange juice, and dried plums (prunes). All fresh fruit and vegetable samples weighed either 3 or 5 pounds (3 pounds were collected for small-sized commodities such as grapes and strawberries, and 5 pounds were collected forlarger commodities such as eggplant and grapefruit). For large-sized commodities, such as cauliflower and cantaloupe, a minimum of twounits were collected to maintain sample representativeness. An exception for these largesized commodities was watermelon; only one unit was collected per sample because of its unusually heavy shipping weight.
Participating State agencies compile and maintain lists of sampling sites. The States provideAMS and NASS with annual volume information for commodities distributed at each site. This information is used to weight the site to determine the probability for sample selection. For example, a weight of 10 may be given to a site that distributes 100,000 pounds of produce annually and a weight of 1 is given to a site thatdistributes 10,000 pounds. The probabilityproportionate-to-size method of site selection then results in the larger site being 10 times more likely to be selected for sampling than the smaller site.
Participating States work with NASS to develop statistical procedures for site weighting and selection. States are also given the option of having NASS perform their quarterly site selection. The number of sampling sites and the volume of produce distributed by the sites vary greatly between States. Sampling plans thatinclude sampling dates, sites (primary and alternate), targeted commodities, and testing laboratories are prepar ed by each State on a quarterly basis. Collection of commodities is randomly assigned to weeks of the month, prior to selection of specific sampling dates within a week. Because sampling sites are selected for an entire quarter, States may assign the sites to particular months base d on geographic location.
State population figures ar e used to assign the number of fruit and vegetable samplesPesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 7 

## scheduled for collection each month. These population- and distri bution-network-based numbers result in the following monthlycollection assignments for each State: California, 14; Colorado, 2; Florida, 7; Maryland, 4; Michigan, 6; New York, 9; Ohio, 6; Texas, 8; Washington, 4; and Wisconsin, 2. This schedule results in a monthly target of 62 samples per commodity, or 744 samples per commodity per year.
The number of samples collected in each State is listed in Table 2. Figure 2 illustrates the participating States and the laboratories to

Table 2. Distribution of Samp les Collected and Analyzed by Each Participating State. This table includes those commodities collected at terminal ma rkets and distribution cente rs. The distribution of soybean, wheat, pork, and drinking water samples may be found in Figures 5, 6, 7, and 8, respectively. AP = Apples GR = Grapes PE = Pears
CF = Cauliflower GZ = Green Beans (Frozen) PU = Plums CM = Heavy Cream LT = Lettuce ST = Strawberries CN = Cantaloupe MK = Milk WB = Bottled Water EP = Eggplant OG = Oranges WM = Watermelon
GB = Green Beans OJ = Orange Juice WS = Winter Squash GF = Grapefruit PD = Plums, Dried (Prunes) 

### Commodity Legend State AP CF CN EP GB GF GR LT OG PE PU ST WM WS Total Fresh California 168 168 126 168 42 167 168 168 168 126 130 168 41 167 1,975 Colorado 24 24 18 24 6 24 24 24 24 18 19 24 - 24 277 Florida 84 84 63 83 21 84 84 84 84 63 64 84 64 84 1,030 Maryland 47 47 36 47 12 47 48 48 48 35 32 48 8 46 549 Michigan 72 72 54 72 18 72 72 72 72 54 53 72 - 72 827 New York 108 108 81 108 27 108 108 108 108 81 96 108 10 108 1,267 Ohio 72 72 54 68 17 72 71 72 71 52 47 70 - 65 803 Texas 96 95 72 96 24 96 93 96 94 72 84 94 59 96 1,167 Washington 48 48 36 48 11 48 48 48 48 36 32 46 - 47 544 Wisconsin 24 23 18 22 3 24 23 23 24 18 16 23 - 22 263 743 741 558 736 181 742 739 743 741 555 573 737 182 731 8,702

State GZ OJ PD Total Processed Total Fresh & Processed F&V California 125 168 36 329 2,304 Colorado 18 24 4 46 323 Florida 63 84 20 167 1,197 Maryland 35 48 13 96 645 Michigan 54 72 10 136 963 New York 81 108 12 201 1,468 Ohio 54 72 25 151 954 Texas 72 96 11 179 1,346 Washington 36 48 16 100 644 Wisconsin 17 24 6 47 310 555 744 153 1,452 10,154 MK 168 24 84 48 72 111 72 96 48 23 746 WB 93 12 36 26 36 48 39 52 24 12 378 CM
84 12 40 24 36 54 35 48 24 12 369 Fresh Fruit and Vegetables

Processed Fruit and Vegetables Dairy Product Water ProductPesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 8 

## which samples were shipped. The total number of samples per commodity and the percentage of each that were either domestic, imported, or of unknown origin are shown in Figure 3. The origin of some fresh commodities can vary greatly throughout the year. Graphic examples of this variation may be found in Figure 4 where differences in origin (domestic vs. import) are depicted for fresh eggplant, grapes, and winter squash by month. Fruit and vegetable samples originated from 39 States and 27 foreign countries.

--Continued Pears (555 Samples) 

### A. Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Commodities

Apples (743 Samples) Cantaloupe (558 Samples) Cauliflower (741 Samples)

Domestic 97.9% Domestic 48.2% Domestic 97.4%

Import 51.4% Import 2.6% Unknown 0.4%



### Eggplant (736 Samples) Grapefruit (742 Samples) Grapes (739 Samples)

Unknown 0.3% Domestic 99.0%

Import 0.7% Domestic 50.2% Domestic 57.6%

Import 39.3% Unknown 3.1%



### Lettuce (743 Samples) Lettuce (743 Samples) Oranges (741 Samples)

Unknown 0.5% Domestic 98.7%

Import 0.8% Domestic 95.1% Domestic 58.6%

Import 4.5% Unknown 0.4%



### Plums (573 Samples) Strawberries (737 Samples)

Import 6.0% Domestic 94.0% Domestic 79.8%

Import 19.8% Import 32.6% Import 49.7% Unknown 0.1% Import 2.0%

Unknown 0.5%

Import 40.2% Domestic 59.3% 

### Green Beans (181 Samples) Unknown 0.1%

Unknown 8.8%

Unknown 0.4%Pesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 9 

## ♦ Grains: Soybeans and Wheat Grain

Trained USDA FGIS inspectors collected 668 soybean samples for PDP for the 2004 crop year (September 2004 through August 2005). The actual sample collection pe riod was divided into two collection phases: October 2004 through February 2005 (493 samples) and April 2005 through August 2005 (175 samples). Samplecollection rates, on a statewide basis, were calculated on the basis of crop production totals averaged over a 3-year period. Samples were drawn from trucks (26% of samples), hopper cars (58% of samples), and barges/ships (16% of samples). Soybeans sl ated for export were excluded from the sampling scheme. PDP chain-of-custody procedures are similar to those used for fruit and vegetable samples. Sample information for soybeans included: inspection location, inspection point code, field office location, official agency collecting the sample, carrier identification (tru ck, barge, or railcar), State of origin, collection date, quantity of lot sampled, and inspector’s name. Pesticide B. Processed Fruit and Vegetable Commodities

Green Beans Peaches (751 Samples)

Domestic 74.5% Domestic 85.4%

Import 14.4% Mixed National 20.8% Import 4.3% Unknown 0.2% 

### Orange Juice (744 Samples) Green Beans, Frozen (555 Samples)



## Figure 3. Commodity Origin. This figure depicts the proportion of commodity origin (domestic vs. import vs. unknow n origin) for each fresh and processed fruit and vegetable product tested in 2005. Peaches (751 Samples)

Domestic 95.4%

Mixed National 0.7% Import 3.2% 

### Plums, Dried (Prunes) (153 Samples) Unknown 0.4%

Unknown 0.7% 

### Watermelon (182 Samples) Peaches (751 Samples)

Domestic 55.8% Domestic 62.6%

Import 29.1% Unknown 1.8% Unknown 8.3%

Import 42.4% 

### Winter Squash (731 Samples)Pesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 10 

### Domestic
Imported



## Figure 4. Origin of Selected Fresh Commoditi es: Eggplant, Grapes, and Winter Squash. Differences in origin (domestic vs. import) are illustrated by month. The targeted number of samples is 62 per month for each commodity. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

J A

N F E

B M A

R A P

R M A

Y J U

N J U

L A U

G S E

P O C

T N O

V D E

C



### 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

J A

N F E

B M A

R A P

R M A

Y J U

N J U

L A U

G S E

P O C

T N O

V D E C



### 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

J A

N F E

B M A

R A P

R M A

Y J U

N J U

L A U

G S E

P O C

T N O

V D E

C 

### Unknown 

## Origin of Eggplant Samples

Origin of Grape Samples

Origin of Winter Squash SamplesNumber of Samples CollectedNumber of Samples CollectedNumber of Samples CollectedPesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 11 

## residue analysis was performed by the GIPSA Technical Services Division Laboratory located in Kansas City, Missouri. Soybean samples originated from 20 States and were collected through 8 regional FGIS offices. There were no imported soybean samples; all were of domesticorigin. The origin and number of samples collected from each State is displayed in Figure 5.
In addition to routine soybean sampling for multiresidue analyses, PDP conducted a special sampling project for compounds used to combat soybean rust from October 2005 through December 2005. In response to an EPA data request, PDP coordinate d with industry to collect soybean samples that were slated only for export. A total of 306 samples were collected primarily from barges (98%-barges and 2%-trucks) that were scheduled for export from New Orleans, Louisiana (291 samples),Brunswick, Georgia (10 samples), and Chesapeake, Virginia (5 samples). Western and northern U.S. ports were excluded from this sampling survey becaus e the soybean rust fungus had not spread beyond the lower Southeastern U.S. where most of the soybean rust compounds had been applied. Sampling and chain-of-custody procedures were the same as those described above for routine soybean collection. Rust co mpound analysis was performed by the GIPSA Technical Services Division Laboratory in Kansas City, Missouri. Michigan



## Figure 5. Number of Samples Co llected and Grower States for Soybeans -- Crop Year 2004. A total of 668 soybean samples were collected between September 2004 and August 2005. The samples originated from 20 States and were collected in proportion to their production volumes. Residue testing for all samples was performed by GIPSA, located in Kansas City, Missouri. South Dakota

Iowa Minnesota

Arkansas North Dakota

A l a b a m a 5 5

12 7

2 5

4 16 16

15

22

22 116 62 44 115 43

44 80

33

Ohio

L o u i s i a n a

States where more than 30 samples originated

States where less than 30 samples originated

GIPSA laboratory—Kansas City, Missouri M i s s i s s i p p i Kansas M i s s o u r i Wisconsin

Nebraska Illinois

I n di a na

N

. C a

r o

l i n

a T

e n n essee

K

en

t uc

k y V ir

g

in

i aPesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 12 

## FGIS inspectors collected 674 samples of wheat grain for PDP for the 2004 crop year (October 2004 through April 2005). Wheat grain samples originated from 27 St ates. The origin and number of samples collected from each State is displayed in Figure 6. Sample collection and chain-of-custody procedures were the same as those described above for routine soybean collection. Wheat grain analysis was performed by the GIPSA Technical Services Division Laboratory in Kansas City, Missouri. ♦ Dairy: Milk and Heavy Cream

PDP State sample collectors obtained 746 whole milk samples from distribution centers or proxy sites in the 10 participating States that received milk from 26 different States. Sixty-five percentof milk samples were collected at retail distribution centers and 35 percent of the samples were collected at proxy sites (supermarkets or retail stores that receive pro duct directly from their distribution centers). Sel ection of proxy sites for

Michigan



## Figure 6. Number of Samples Co llected and Grower States for Wheat -- Crop Year 2004. A total of 674 wheat samples were collected. The samples originated from 27 States and were collected in proportion to their production volumes. Residue testing for all samples was performed by GIPSA, located in Kansas City, Missouri. South Dakota Minnesota

Arkansas North Dakota

A l a b a m a 7 3

1 6

1 2

4 16 123

4

127

13 15 8 23 20

17 33

26

Ohio

L o u i s i a n a

States where more than 30 samples originated

States where less than 30 samples originated

GIPSA laboratory—Kansas City, Missouri M i s s i s s i p p i Kansas M i s s o u r i Wisconsin

Nebraska Illinois

I n di a na

N

. C a

r o

l i n

a T

e n n essee

K

en

t uc

k y V ir

g

in

i a California 3 20 Colorado

Georgia 3 Idaho

30 Montana
52

Oklahoma
44

Texas

31 Washington 45Pesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 13 

## milk sample collection is based on a store’s close geographic proximity to its milk distribution center. All whole milk samples were of domestic origin. Sample collection States are found inTable 2. Shipment and chain-of-custody procedures were the same as for fruit and vegetable samples. Pesticide residue analysis for all samples was performed by the AMS NSL in Gastonia, North Carolina.
Between July and December, 369 heavy cream samples were collected by PDP State sample collectors. The heavy cream samples were collected from distributi on centers or proxy sites that received the cream from 22 different States. Sixty-six percent of the heavy cream samples were collected at retail distribution centers and 34 percent of the sample s were collected at proxy sites. Selection of proxy sites for heavy cream sample collection was the same as described above for milk. All heavy creamsamples were of domestic origin. Sample collection States are found in Table 2. Shipment and chain-of-custody procedures were the same as for fruit and vegetable samples. Pesticide residue analysis for all samples was performed by the AMS NSL in Gastonia, North Carolina.

♦ Pork
Between January and June, 704 pork samples were collected for PDP by trained FSIS inspectors. The inspector s collected samples at designated slaughter facilit ies, separately bagged each tissue in pesticide-free polyethylene bags, labeled the samples, and froze the samples overnight. Once frozen, the samples were packedwith frozen cold packs, the boxes tamperproofed, and shipped by overnight delivery to the NSL laboratory in Ga stonia, North Carolina, for analysis. FSIS used specially designed Unified Sampling Forms that contain all required PDP sample information. The forms were completed on site and accompanied each sample during shipment. Gilts (young female sows) and barrows (young castrated males) were sampled at the ratio of 51 pe rcent and 47 percent, respectively. Two percent of the samples were of an unknown type. Site samples consisted of approximately 1 pound of adipose tissue (352 samples) and 1 pound of muscle tissue (352 samples). Each set of tissues was sampled from the same hog. For the adipose tissue, back fat (51 percent of samples) and belly fat (49 percent of samples) were collected. Samples were taken from 40 slaughter facilitie s at rates according to throughput volume in 18 States (refer to Figure 7 for distribution of samples in each State). Ninety-six percent of all samples were obtained from hogs that were of domestic origin; four percent were of Canadian origin. All pork samples were analyzed by NSL, Gastonia, North Carolina.

♦ Bottled Water and Municipal Drinking Water
PDP State sample collectors collected 378 bottled water samples at a half sampling rate from the 10 participating States (California-7, Colorado-1, Florida-3, Maryland-2, Michigan-3, New York-4, Ohio-3, Te xas-4, Washington-2, and Wisconsin-1). Eighty -five percent of the samples were of domestic origin, 14 percent were imported, and 1 percent was of unknown origin. A minimum of 2 liters per sample wascollected from retail facilities in each participating State. Bottled water types excluded from the sampling scheme were: sparkling bottled water and mineral water. Artific ially carbonated water, seltzer water, and flavored water, which are not regulated by FDA as bottl ed water, also were not included in the sampling scheme. Most bottled water sample collection was performed at proxy sites (retail stores) because local, as well as national brands, were included in thesurvey. Sample information and packing procedures were the same as those for fruit and vegetables; however, the in clusion of cold packsfor shipping was unnecessary. Sample information on bottled water also included (1) bottle type and (2) brand name. Sample collection States are found in Table 2. Sample analysis was performed by the State laboratory in Minnesota.
In the municipal water sampling project, 750 drinking water samples were collected from community water systems in California, Florida,Pesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 14 

## Louisiana, Michigan, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Washington. Samples were collected bimonthly by trained water treatment facility personnel and sent to State laboratories in Colorado, Montana, and New York for analysis. Samples included water collected from both the raw water intake and thefinished drinking water after treatment. The untreated intake water and treated water were collected as paired samp les, taking into accounteach individual plant’s processing time. Dechlorination and preservative chemicals were added to the samples at the time of collection. Samples were packed with frozen cold packs and shipped overnight to the testing laboratories. Two years of water sample collection inMichigan, North Carolina, Ohio, and Washington were completed in 2005. Five sites in Oregon (3), Pennsylvani a (1), and Washington (1) were replaced in 2005 with only 1 year of sampling after evaluation of the data. The new sites in Louisiana, Pe nnsylvania, California, and North Dakota were sampled bimonthly as before; however, they were sampled weekly during the months of April, May, and June, when pesticides were more likely to have been heavily applied in those regions. Site selection was made in collaboration with EPA’s Office of Pesticide Programs. All selected sites met Figure 7. Location of Pork Sample Collection Sites. A total of 704 pork samples were collected, including 352 adipose tissue samples and 352 muscle tissue samples from the same hog. All samples were approximately 1 pound. FSIS inspectors collected samples at designated slaughter facilities. The samples originated from 25 States (12 samples were of unknown origin and 14 samples were from Canada). Residue testing for all samples was performed by th e National Science Laboratory in Gastonia, North Carolina. Michigan

N

. C ar

o

l i na 4

38

106 10 

### Ohio Iowa

12 212 

### Montana

Kansas N e w

Y

o r k



### California P en ns y l v ania



### Maryland 2

2 82

Arkansas


### Georgia 34 28

2 

### I llinois

I n d i a n a

4 

### Minnesota

Missouri 12 2



### Oklahoma Nebraska

38 2

48 

### South Dakota Oregon
2



### South Carolina 2 4



### Texas 8 8 

### Utah

V i r

g

i n i a 10 Wisconsin 6

States where more than 30 samples were collected.

States where less than 30 samples were collected.

USDA, National Science Laboratory, Gastonia, North CarolinaPesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 15 

## the following criteria: (1) service to populations under 50,000; (2) use of surface water as the primary source of water; and (3) location in regions of heavy ag riculture where known amounts of pesticides were applied. Water treatment method was not part of the selection criteria. General locations of water collection sites and testing laboratories are illustrated in Figure 8. 

# III. Laboratory Operations

♦ Overview

Twelve laboratories (10 State and 2 Federal) performed analyses for PDP. These laboratories are equipped with instrumentation capable of detecting residues at verylow levels. Laboratory staff members receive intensive training and must demonstrate analytical proficiency on a periodic basis. Program scientists continuously test new technologies and develop new techniques to improve the leve ls of detection. Major changes in methodology are evaluated and their soundness demonstrated and documented in accordance with PDP SOPs.

♦ Fresh and Processed Fruit and Vegetables
PDP participating laboratories analyzing fruit and vegetables monitored 251 parent pesticides, metabolites, degradates, and isomers using Multiresidue Methods (M RMs). Upon arrival at the testing facility, samples are visually examined for acceptabili ty and discarded if

Figure 8. Location of Drinking Water Collection Sites at Community Water Systems, 2005. A total of 16 water treatment fac ilities in the U.S. were sampled in paired units (coordinated treated and untrea ted samples). Sites represent areas of varied geographical settings but are loca ted in watersheds where pesticides were known to have been heavily applied. Michigan

N

. C ar

o

l i na 1

4

3 1 

### Ohio Washington

1 2



### Montana

Colorado

Sampled States (# of Sites)

Location of State laboratories that perform sample analysis N e w

Y

o r k



### California P en ns y l v ania



### Florida 1 

### Louisiana

1 1 

### North DakotaPesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 16 

## determined to be inedible (decayed, extensively bruised, or spoiled). Accepted samples are prepared emulating the practices of the averageconsumer to more closely represent actual exposure to residues. Fresh samples are prepared as follows: (1) apples and pears are washed with stems and cores removed; (2) cantaloupes are cut in half and seeds and rinds are removed; (3) cauliflower is washed and the wrapper leaves are removed; (4) eggplant and winter squash are washed and end pieces are removed; (5) grapes and green beans are washed and stems and extraneous materials are removed; (6) grapefruitand oranges are peeled and excess white membrane is removed; (7) le ttuce is washed, wrapper leaves are removed (head lettuce only), and damaged portions are removed; (8) plums are washed, the stems and leaves removed, and pitted; (9) strawberries are rinsed and stems and leaves are removed; and (10) watermelon is quartered and the rind removed; for large watermelon, alternate quarters of each fruit are homogenized (rind removed).
Processed samples are prepared as follows: (1) frozen green beans are homogenized with their entire contents, includingany liquid present; (2) fresh and reconstituted or ange juice samples are mixed until homogeneous; and (3) dried plums are mixed to ensure homogeneity.
Laboratories are permitted to refrigerate incoming fresh fruit and vegetable samples of the same commodity for up to 72 hours to allow for different sample arrival times from collection sites. Frozen and canned commodities may be held in storage (freezer or shelf) until the entire sample set is ready for analysis. Samples are homogenized using choppe rs and/or blenders and are separated into analytical portions (aliquots) for analysis. If testing cannot be performed immediately, the entire analytical set is frozen at -40°C or lower, according to PDP’s Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) require-ments. Surplus aliquots not used for the initial testing are retained frozen in the event that replication of analys is or verification testing is required. For analysis of fruit and vegetables, residues are extracted using organic solvents followed by various cleanup procedures such as Solid Phase Extraction (SPE). The California, Florida (Winter Haven), and Wa shington laboratories used modifications of the MRM developed by the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA). The New York laboratory used a method based on the Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada SPE method with some modifications based on the Luke procedure. The Florida (Tallahassee) and Michigan laboratories used a modified version of the QuEChERS method, deve loped and published in July 2003 by USDA’s Agricultural Research Service. The Ohio laboratory used variations and combinations of the FDA Luke I [Section 302 of Pesticide Analyt ical Manual (PAM) I] and Luke II [FDA Laboratory Information Bulletin (LIB) 3896] extraction procedures. The Texas laboratory used its adaptation of the Luke procedures for cantaloupe and winter squash and the CDFA method for watermelon. The Texas laboratory plans a full switch to the CDFA method as new commodities come into the program. All MRMs are determined, prior to use and through appropriate method validation procedures, to produce equivalent data for PDP analytical purposes.
Gas Chromatography (GC) and Liquid Chromatography (LC), coupled w ith selective detectors and Mass Spectrometry (MS) systems, are used for the initial identification and quantitation of pesticides. Laboratories are increasing their use of GC- and LC-MS systems and are specifically focusing on LC/MS-MS techniques to broaden the scope of testing and to keep pace with emerging analyte chemistries. All residuesinitially identified must be verified. Confirmation is accomplished by MS, alternate detection systems, or a lternate chromatographic behavior. Verification is considered crucial due to the complexity of commodity matrices and the low concentrations of detected residues. The verification process provides an extra measure of confidence in the identification of the analyte and its concentration.Pesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 17 

## Triazoles – Strawberries: The Michigan laboratory analyzed strawberries for three common metabolites of the triazole fungicides: 1,2,4- triazole, triazole acetic acid, and triazole alanine. The analyses were performed using LC coupled with tandem MS in order to achieve the low parts per billion (ppb) detection limits required for dietary risk assessment. Testing for the three common metabolites required development of special analytical techniques in addition to the more conventional PDP multiresidue methods.

♦ Soybeans and Wheat

The USDA GIPSA laborat ory in Kansas City, Missouri, analyzed soybean samples for 83 parent pesticides, metabolites, and isomers andwheat samples for 71 parent pesticides, metabolites, and isomers. On arrival at the testing facility, samples were visually examined for acceptability and discarded if moldy or infested. Samples were ground before being analyzed and surplus sample aliquots, not used for the initial testing, were retained inthe event that replication of analysis or ve rification testing was required. Extraction of soybean and wheatsamples was accomplished using solvent extraction and SPE cleanup coupled with MS detection.

♦ Soybean Rust/Aphid Special Survey
During October through December 2005, the USDA GIPSA laboratory also performed a special survey to monitor soybeans for 14 identified compounds used to combat soybean rust - azoxystrobin, bo scalid, cyproconazole,difenoconazole, epoxiconazole, fenarimol, fluquinconazole, flutriafol , myclobutanil, propiconazole, pyraclostrobin, tebuconazole, tetraconazole, and trifloxystrobin. In addition, the laboratory analyzed for two compounds used to control Chinese aphid, pymetrozine and thiamethoxam. A specialized method was developedin order to optimize recovery of the 16 compounds. Ground samples were extracted with organic solvent and cleaned using a combined SPE procedure. Analysis was performed using LC/MS-MS. ♦ Milk and Heavy Cream

The AMS NSL in Gastonia, North Carolina, tested milk and heavy cream samples for 88 parent pesticides, metabolites, degradates, and isomers. For milk, 1-quart to 1-gallon samples were collected and for cream, 1-pint cartons were collected for shipment to the testing facility. Upon arrival at the testing facility,samples were visually examined for acceptability and discarded if spoiled or if the containers had been ruptured during shipping. Samples were refrigerated until sample aliquots were taken, after which the al iquots were frozen (-70° C) prior to analysis. Because the milk and cream samples received were homogenized, further mixing at the laboratory was not required. A 100-gram aliquot was weighed for milk and a10-gram aliquot was weighed for cream followed by organic solvent extraction and sample cleanup using ultra-low refrigeration (-70°C), centrifugation, and dispersive SPE. For both milk and cream, three extra sample aliquots were weighed, frozen, and kept in reserve in the event that replication of analysis or verification testing was required. Surplus milk and cream remaining after the four aliquots were taken was then discarded. Samples were analyzed using GC with MS detection and selective detectors and high performance li quid chromatography (HPLC) with post-column derivatization and fluorescence detection.

♦ Pork (Adipose and Muscle)

The AMS NSL also tested pork adipose samplesfor 133 parent pesticides, metabolites, degradates, and isomers and pork muscle samples for 121 parent pesticides, metabolites, degradates, and isomers. For both pork adipose and pork muscle, approximately 1-pound samples were collected for shipment to the testing facility. Upon arrival at the testing facility, samples werevisually examined for acceptability and discarded if warm to the touch, spoiled, or leaking. If not homogenized immedi ately after arrival, samples were frozen at 0°C or lower untilhomogenized. The tissue samples were homogenized by grinding with dry ice in a large,Pesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 18

## high-speed food processor. The sample homogenates were placed into sample cups (approximately 60 grams per cup) and allowed to sublime at -20°C overnight before being stored at -70°C prior to analysis. A 20-gram aliquot was weighed for pork muscle and a 10-gram aliquot was weighed fo r pork adipose followed by organic solvent extraction and sample cleanup using ultra-low refrigeration (-70°C), centrifugation, and disp ersive SPE. For both pork muscle and adipose tissues, two extra sample homogenate cups, not used for the initial testing, were retained frozen in the event that replication of analysis or verification testing was required. Surplus pork tissue homogenate remaining after the three sample cups were filled was then discarded. Samples were analyzed using GC-MS and selective detectors and LC/ MS-MS.

♦ Bottled Water

The Minnesota laborat ory analyzed bottled water for 82 parent pesticides, metabolites, and isomers. These compounds were determined to be of interest to EPA based on data needs for risk assessment as re quired under FQPA. Upon arrival at the testing laboratory, samples were visually examined fo r acceptability (within labeled expiration date, no leakage). Samples were refrigerated until time of analysis. One liter of the sample provided was extracted for compounds amenable to GC analysis and one for chloroacetanilide co mpounds to be analyzed via LC/MS-MS.

♦ Drinking Water

The Colorado, Montana, and New York laboratories analyzed dri nking water for 222 parent pesticides, metabolites, degradates, and isomers. These compounds were determined to be of interest to EPA. Paired samples of the raw intake water (untreated) and disinfected finished drinking water (treated) were collected for analysis. Treated water samples were collected after the untreated samples at a time intervalconsistent with the hydraulic residence. Hydraulic residence is the average time from entry into the treatment facility until distribution as treated water. Each sample consisted of three 1-liter amber glass bottles collected at the water treatment facility. Upon arrival at the testing laboratory, samples were visually examined for acceptability and discarded if warm to the touch or leaking. Samples were refrigerated until time of analysis and extrac ted within 96 hours of collection. A 1-liter bottle was extracted for compounds amenable to GC analysis and another one for compounds amenable to LC analysis. The remaining bottle was held in reserve or extracted fo r specialty compounds requiring separate extrac tion/analytical procedures [e.g., ethane su lfonic acid (ESA) andoxanilic acid (OA) analogs of alachlor, acetochlor, and metolachlor]. Extraction methods used were based on SPE methods developed by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and were independently validated by each testing laboratory. Samples were analyzed using MS detection (single and tandem GC and LC technologies), selective detectors, or post-column derivatization HPLC detection systems.

♦ Quality Assurance Program
The primary objectives of the QA/QC program are to ensure the reliabi lity of PDP data and the performance equivalency of the participating laboratories. Direction for the PDP QA program is provided through SOPs based on EPA GoodLaboratory Practices (GLPs). Written SOPs provide uniform administrative, sampling, and laboratory procedures. SO Ps are revised annually to accommodate changes in the program. Aslaboratories continue to move toward accreditation to ISO 17025, program SOPs are being modified to align with these ISO requirements. Prior to submission to PDP, data are reviewed byeach Quality Assurance Unit (QAU) for completeness and adherence to PDP requirements.

Laboratory Technical Advisory Group and Quality Assurance Officers: A Technical Advisory Group comprised of laboratory TechnicalProgram Managers (TPMs) and Quality Assurance Officers (QAOs) is responsible for annually reviewing program SOPs and addressing QAPesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 19 

## issues. For day-to-dayQA oversight, PDP relies on the QAU at each participating facility. As required under EPA GLPs, the QAU operates independently from the laboratory staff and is responsible for performi ng quarterly internalprogram audits. Preliminary data review procedures are performed on-site by each laboratory’s QAU. Final review procedures are performed by PDP staff who are responsible for collating and reviewing data for conformance with SOPs.

Method Performance Requirements: Laboratories are required to determine and verify thelimits of detection (LODs) and limits of quantitation (LOQs) for each pesticide/commodity pair. LODs depend on matrix, analyte, and detector used. LODs for each pesticide/commodity pair are shown in the applicab le crop results appendix. Additional method performance/validation requirements include modules for consistent instrument response ( linearity), method range, and precision and accuracy.

Confirmation: Verification by MS or a suitable alternate detection syst em is required for all preliminary results. Veri fied residue amounts greater than or equal to LOD and below LOQ are reported as below quantifiable level (BQL). BQLs are assigned values at one-half the LOQ, and are used along with values greater than or equal to LOQ and non-detects in dietary risk assessments, when appropriate.

Routine Quality Control Procedures: PDP procedures for QC are intended to assess methodand analyst performance during sample preparation, clean-up, extraction, and, where applicable, derivatization. To maxi mize sample output and decrease the QC/sample ratio, samples are analyzed in analytical sets that include the test samples and the following components:
Reagent Blank - For analysis of fruit and vegetables, soybeans, wheat, milk, heavy cream,and pork, an amount of distilled water, equivalent to the natural moisture content of the commodity, is run through the entire analytical process to confirm gla ssware cleanliness and system integrity. Matrix Blank - A previously analyzed sample of the same commodity, which contains either very low concentrations of known residues or no detectable residues, is divided into two portions. The first portion is used to determine background information on naturally occurring chemicals and the second is used to prepare a matrix spike.
Matrix Spike(s) - Prior to extraction, a portionof matrix blank is spiked with marker pesticides to determine the precision and accuracy of the analyst and instrument performance. Marker pesticides are compounds selected from different pesticide cl asses (e.g., organochlorines, organophosphates, carbamates, conazoles, imidazolinones, neonicotinyls, phenoxy acid herbicides, pyrethr oids, strobilurins, triazines), which have physical and chemical characteristics similar to those in the class theyrepresent. Marker pesticides are used to monitor recovery instead of spiking all pesticides. This use of marker pesticides optimizes the resources required to an alyze the thousands of analyte/matrix combinations in the program while still allowing evaluation of daily recovery patterns. In addition, each laboratory must perform matrix spik es throughout the year for each analyte/crop combination reported by their laboratory. During 2005, PDP laboratories quantitated a total of 43,059 matrix spikes, with an overall mean recoveryof 91 percent and an overall percent coefficient of variation (% C.V.) of 26 percent. The % C.V. is calculated as the standard deviation divided by the mean.
Process Control Spike - A compound with physical and chemical characteristics similar to those of the pesticides being tested is used toevaluate the analytical process on a sample-bysample basis. Each of the analytical set components, except the reagent and matrix blanks, is spiked with process controls. During 2005, PDP laboratories quantitated a total of 54,997 process controls on 14,749 samples, with an overall mean recovery of 96 percent and an overall % C.V. of 19 percent. Of these process controls, 327 (0.59 percent) were rerun due to initial failure to meet PDP recovery criteria.Pesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 20 

## These rerun values are not included in these statistics.

Proficiency Testing: All facilities are required to participate in PDP’s Proficiency Testing (PT) program. For laboratories testing fresh and processed fruit and vege tables, grains, dairy products, and meats, multiresidue test samples containing pesticides of known quantities are periodically issued and analyzed under the same conditions as routine samples. The resulting data are used to determine performance equivalency among the testing laboratories and to evaluate individual laboratory performance. During 2005, PDP laboratories received 5 multiresidue fruit and vegetable proficiency testing sets consisting of 15 samples, 1 soybean and 1 wheat set each consisting of 3 samples, and 1 milk and 1 heavy cream set each consisting of 3 samples. For fruit and vegetable multiresidue screening, the 15samples comprised 5 commodities and were fortified with 58 compounds atlevels generally 1 to 10 times the LOQ. Five compounds were repeated once. Reported results for fruit and vegetable samples yielded an overall mean recovery of 95 percent and an overall % C.V. of 17 percent.
Additionally, PDP laboratories participated in the international AOAC ® 

## proficiency testingprogram. During 2005, PDP laboratories participated in two test rounds, one for apples and one for strawberries. Each sample set was fortified with 10 pesticides. Laboratories were evaluated based on z-scores for reported compounds, as well as any reported fals e negatives or false positives. Laboratories were not held responsible for reporting compounds not included in theirroutine screening method. Overall, PDP laboratories performed as well or better than other participating laboratories.
For water, two proficiency sample sets were analyzed during 2005. For the first set, a commercial vendor supplied PT solutions to the testing laboratories. Solution profiles were based on common laboratory an alytical profiles and detection limits. Test solutions were used for spiking, rather than di stribution of spiked samples, due to stability concerns. For each PT set, the vendor supplie d the laboratory’s QAUwith a custom solution that was diluted according to program protocols by the onsite QAU and fortified into one liter of unfiltered tap water. The spiked samples were then presented to the staff members of each respective laboratory foranalysis. For the other drinking water set, replicate samples from a site whose samples historically contained multiple pesticides were sent to each of the water-testing laboratories and reported results compared.

On-site Reviews: PDP staff performs on-site visits to determine compliance with PDP SOPs. Improvements in sampling, chain-of-custody, laboratory, recordkeeping, and electronic data transmission procedures are made as a result of on-site reviews. 

# IV. Database Management

PDP maintains an electronic database at the MPO in Manassas, Virginia, that serves as a central data repository. The data captured and stored in the PDP database include samplecollection and product information, residue findings, and process control recoveries for each sample analyzed, in addition to QA/QC fortified recoveries for each se t of samples. Each calendar-year survey is stored in a separate database structure, al lowing easier administration and data reporting. The PDP data path is illustrated in Figure 9.

♦ Electronic Data Path
PDP utilizes the Remote Data Entry (RDE)system, which is a customized software application that allows particip ating State and Federallaboratories to enter and transmit data electronically. The RDE system is centralized with all user interface software and database files residing in Washington, D.C. The laboratory users need only a Web browser to interface with the RDE system. Access is controlled through separate user login/password accounts and user access rights for the various system functions based on position requirements. The RDEPesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 21 

## Figure 9. PDP Data Pathway. An illustration of PDP data path from sample collection through laboratory analysis and reporting. - 10 State labs + 2 USDA labs - Fruit and vegetable samples prepared for consumption - Detect residues at low levels - Pesticide residue data generated

- Multi-tiered QA data review process 

## Laboratory Analysis Sample Collection

- Collection in 10 States - Samples taken close to consumer - Standardized Sample Information Form - Data entry on handheld/laptop computers

- Web-based data entry software - Import data from other systems - Access controlled by user login - Extensive data cross-checks 

## Laboratory Remote Data Entry (RDE) Data Review at HQ

- Chemists review data on-screen - Upload data to central database



## Year-end Review

- Data reconciliation Internet

Internet

- Standard & adhoc reporting - Annual Summary - Custom data sets 

## Data ReportingPesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 22 

## system utilizes Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) technology to encrypt all data passed between users’ computers and the central Web server.
A separate Windows ® 

## -based system allows sample collectors to capture the standardizedSIF electronically on handheld or laptop computers. The e-SIF system generates formatted text files containing sample information that are e-mailed to PDP headquarters and then imported into the Web-based RDE system.
The RDE data entry screens have extensive editing functions and cross-checks built into the software to ensure that valid values are entered for all critical data elements. This task is made easier by the practice of capturing and storing standardized codes for all critical alphanumeric data elements rather than their complete names, meanings, or descriptions. This coding scheme allows for faster and more accurate data entry, saves disk storage space, and allows the user to perform adhoc queries (data searches) on the database easily. The data entry screens also perform automatic edits on numeric fields, dates, and other character fields to ensure that entries are within prescribed boundaries.
At PDP headquarters, the RDE system allows staff chemists to review the data on-line and then to mark the data as ready-for-upload to the central PDP database. A separate upload application converts and passes the data to the PDP database which is presently maintained using Microsoft ® 

## Access in a Windows ® 

## operating environment. Access to the central PDP database is limited to PDP staff personnel only and is controlled through passwordprotection and user access rights. System backups are performed each ni ght and back-up tapes are sent to off-site storage once a week.

♦ Data Reporting
The PDP staff frequently receives requests for data from Government agencies and interested outside parties. Ad-hoc queries and custom reports are generated to fill such requests. An electronic library of dataqueries is maintained to generate standardized data summaries, including the data tables, charts, and appendices in this annual summary. Subsets of the PDP calendar-year databases are made available for download from the PDP Website. The data files on the Website are fixed-length text files that contain a portion of the sampling data, all of the reported residue findings, and reference lists that can be used to interpret the standardized codes used in the PDP data. The data files can be imported into defined database structures and manipulated with the use of common database management software packages.


# V. Sample Results and Discussion

♦ Sample Results
In 2005, PDP conducted surveys on a variety of foods including fresh and processed fruit and vegetables, soybeans, wheat, milk, heavy cream, pork, bottled water, and drinking water. Of the 14,749 samples that were collected and analyzed, 10,154 were fruit and vegetable commodities, 668 were soybean samples, 306 were soybean rust/aphid survey samples, 674 were wheat samples, 746 were milk samples, 369 were heavy cream samples, 704 were pork samples, 378 were bottled water samples, and 750 were drinking water samples.
Excluding drinking water samples, which were all from U.S. sources, approximately 84 percent of all samples were produced in the U.S., 14 percent were imports, approximately 1 percent were of mixed origin, and about 1 percent were of unknown origin. Appendix K shows the distribution of sample origin by State orcountry. Of the domestic samples, approximately 40 percent (4,614 of 11,737) were grown, packed, and/or di stributed in or from California. Approximately21 percent (155 of 744) of the orange juice samples were of mixed national origin (i.e., the juice was comprised of oranges grown in more than one country). Appendix L includes a comparison of residues for selected commodities with a significant import component.Pesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 23 

## Table 3 gives an overvi ew of the number of residue detections for fr esh and processed fruit and vegetables, grains, dairy, meat and water products determined during 2005. Overall 73 percent of fresh fruit and vegetables and 61 percent of processed fruit and vegetables showed detectable resi dues. The percent of samples with detections ranged from 13 percent (dried plums) to 98 percent (apples). Residues were detected in 22 percent of the soybean samples, 75 percent of the wheat samples, 99 percent of the milk samples, 99 percent of the heavy cream samples, 8 percent of the pork samples, and 16 percent of the bottled water samples. Residue findings in heavy cream and milk were primarily low level detections of diphenylamine and the unavoidable environmental contaminants DDE p,p’ and dieldrin.
Appendix B tabulates the distribution of residues in fruit and vegetables for the complete 2005 data set. Information included in this appendix are: number of samples analyzed for a particular compound; number and percent of samples with detections; range of concentrations dete cted; tolerance violations; range of analyti cal LODs; EPA tolerance levels or FDA action levels; and corresponding Codex Alimentarius MRLs and/or extraneousmaximum residue limits (EMRLs), when applicable. Appendices C, D, E, F, G, H, I, and J provide the distribution of residues for soybeans, soybean rust/aphid special survey, wheat, milk, heavy cream, pork, bottled water, and drinking water, respectively. The individual sample data can be downloaded from the PDP Website or obtained by contacting MPO.
In 2005, PDP also completed a special study of triazole fungicides an d metabolites begun in 2003 at the request of EPA. Michigan analyzed more than 500 strawberry samples for parent triazoles and common triazole metabolites. Triazole alanine was detected in 11.1 percent of the samples and 1,2,4-triazole was detected in less than 1 percent of the samples. Parent triazoles myclobutanil and triflumizole were detected in 34.7 and 1.4 percent of samples respectively. Triadimefon and triazole acetic acid were not detected.
Food monitoring data, together with dietary consumption surveys, are used by EPA to estimate dietary exposure to pesticides to ensure the safety of existing pesticide uses. EPA uses all results reported by PDP, including sample results reported as below the LOD and those above the tolerance. PDP laboratories are required to establish LODs and report any instrumental response below the LOD as a non-detect. LODs are established experimentally for each pesticide/commodity pair and are reported with each data set. The number of non-detects can be used in conjunction with percent crop treated data to determine what proportion of these values may be counted as zero towards the dietary exposure. As shown in Table 3, 33.7 percent of the samples (excluding drinking water and soybean rust/aphid samples) were reported as having no residue detections (i.e., results were below the established LOD). For samples containing residues, the vast majority of the detections were well below established tolerances.

♦ Fresh vs. Processed

The 2005 residue data, as in past years, show that residue profiles for fresh products are significantly different than for processed products. Raw agricultural commodities, if specifically grown for processing into juice for example, could receive different treatments than products destined for fresh market. An increase in residue leve ls (concentration) or reduction in residue levels is likely a direct result of processing ef fects such as cooking, pasteurization, and other processing steps. A comparison of residues for selected fresh and processed products is shown in Table 4.

For fresh and/or frozen green beans, detection of pesticides in greater than 10 percent of thesamples included acephate, bifenthrin, chlorothalonil, endosulfan I, endosulfan II, endosulfan sulfate, methamidophos, andPesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 24 

## Table 3. Number of Samples Analyzed and Su mmary of Residues Detected by Commodity. The distinction between the number of pesticides and different residues is made to differentiate a parent compound and its metabolite(s). A parent compound and its metabolites are re ported as a single pesticide detection rather than as separate residue detections. TOTAL PROCESSED Number of Samples Analyzed Samples with Residues Detected Percent of Samples with Detections Different Pesticides Detected Different Residues Detected Total Residue Detections

Apples 743 727 98 36 43 2,643 Cantaloupe 558 288 52 22 27 445 Cauliflower 741 650 88 16 17 816 Eggplant 736 172 23 15 18 315 Grapefruit 742 470 63 11 13 643 Grapes 739 520 70 31 34 1,250 Green Beans 181 166 92 18 22 536 Lettuce 743 696 94 43 52 2,475 Oranges 741 670 90 14 16 1,195 Pears 555 473 85 25 29 979 Plums 573 426 74 16 16 652 Strawberries 737 685 93 30 39 1,938 Watermelon 182 70 38 12 14 101 Winter Squash 731 313 43 25 30 452 8,702 6,326 73 14,440

Green Beans, Frozen 555 431 78 18 19 756 Orange Juice 744 430 58 9 10 459 Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 20 13 7 7 25 1,452 881 61 1,240

Number of Samples Analyzed = 10,154 Number of Samples with Residues Detected = 7,207 Percent with Residue Detections = 71.0%

Soybeans 668 144 22 9 9 150 Wheat 674 508 75 18 18 750 1,342 652 49 900

Number of Samples Analyzed = 13,693 Number of Samples with Residues Detected = 9,080 Percent with Residue Detections = 66.3% Fresh Fruit and Vegetables:

Processed Fruit and Vegetables: TOTAL FRESH

Dairy Product: Grain Product: 

### Fruit and Vegetables Totals:

All Commodities (excludes 750 drinking water samples and 306 soybean rust/aphid special survey samples): TOTAL GRAIN

Heavy Cream 369 366 99 9 11 901 Milk 746 738 99 12 12 1,857 1,115 1,104 99 2,758 Total Number of Different Pesticides Detected = 105 Total Number of Different Residues Detected = 118 Total Number of Residue Detections = 15,680

Total Number of Different Pesticides Detected = 166 Total Number of Different Residues Detected = 178 Total Number of Residue Detections = 19,513 Pork, Adipose 352 40 11 7 8 50 Pork, Muscle 352 18 5 2 3 20 704 58 8 70

Water Product:

Bottled Water 378 59 16 7 14 105 TOTAL DAIRY

TOTAL MEAT Meat Tissues:Pesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 25 

## vinclozolin. Acephate and methamidophos detections were essentially the same in the fresh green beans and frozen green beans. Chlorothalonil, endosulfan I, and endosulfan II were detected in fresh green beans, whereas there were no detections of these compounds in frozen green beans. Endosulfan sulfate was present in 58.6 percent of fresh green beans but was detected in only 0.7 percent of frozen green beans. In contrast, vinclozolin was detected in frozen green beans, but not the fresh product, and detections of bifenthrin were higher in the frozen green beans than in the fresh product.
A direct comparison of fr esh oranges to orange juice can be problematic. Not only may oranges specifically gr own for processing into juice receive different treatments than products destined for the fresh market, but entirely different varieties are grown specifically for juice production and may be treated completelydifferently from fresh market oranges. Approximately 21 percent of orange juice samples were comprised of juice from oranges grown in different countries. Ortho-phenylphenol was found in 52.0 percent of the orange juice samples and in 34.4 percent of the fresh product. In contrast, imazalil was found in 1.5 percent of the juice and on 74.2 percent of fresh oranges. Thiabendazole was detected in less than 1 percent of the juice samples but was detected in 43.7 percent of fresh oranges. Results for fresh plums are compared to Table 4. Selected Residue Comparisons for Fresh and Processed Commodities. The percentage of samples with detections and the range of reporte d values for selected pestic ides recovered from fresh vs. processed green beans, oranges and plums a re shown. Commodity/residue pairs were selected based on the following criteria: data availability for fresh and processed product within the same sampling timeframe; greater than 10% detection rate for a residue in either the fresh or processed commodity; and number of samples analyzed suffic ient to ensure adequate representation. Pesticide % of Samples

with Detects Minimum Value Detected, ppm Maximum Value Detected, ppm % of Samples

with Detects Minimum Value Detected, ppm Maximum Value Detected, ppm Acephate 21.0 0.003 3.0 26.8 0.003 0.88
Bifenthrin 2.8 0.013 0.39 12.6 0.013 0.093
Chlorothalonil 35.9 0.003 3.9 0 0 0
Endosulfan I 43.6 0.003 0.13 0 0 0
Endosulfan II 32.0 0.003 0.15 0 0 0
Endosulfan sulfate 58.6 0.003 0.47 0.7 0.003 0.003 Methamidophos 24.9 0.003 1.0 25.4 0.003 0.27
Vinclozolin 0 0 0 47.4 0.004 0.4 

### GREEN BEANS -- Fresh (2005) GREEN BEANS -- Frozen (2005)

Imazalil 74.2 0.050 0.79 1.5 0.050 0.25 o-Phenylphenol 34.3 0.017 0.084 52.0 0.017 0.096
Thiabendazole 43.7 0.050 0.61 0.5 0.05 0.23 

### ORANGES -- Fresh (2005) ORANGE JUICE (2005)

Fludioxonil 20.6 0.18 1.0 0 0 0 Iprodione 39.6 0.065 7.1 0 0 0
Phosmet 19.4 0.005 0.58 0 0 0 

### PLUMS -- Fresh (2005) PLUMS -- Dried (2005)Pesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 26 

## findings for dried plum s in Table 4. Fludioxonil (20.6%), iprodione (39.6%), and phosmet (19.4%) were detected in fresh plums. None of these compounds were detected in the dried product.
Fludioxonil was found in fresh plums but not dried; the highest residue detected was 1.0 parts per million (ppm) or 20 percent of the tolerance. Iprodione was found in fresh plums but not dried; the highest resi due detected was 7.1 ppm or 36 percent of the tolerance. Phosmet was found in fresh plums but not dried; the highest residue detected was 0.58 ppm or 12 percent of the tolerance.

♦ Import vs. Domestic Residue Comparisons
Information about the origin of each PDP sample is recorded when the sample is collected. Figure 3 illust rates the portion of the domestic and import component for each PDP fruit and vegetable commodity in 2005. The data generated by PDP reflect pesticideresidues in foods available to the U.S. consumer, including both domestic and imported products. Many commodities are almost entirely of domestic or igin with only a minorimport component. However, some fresh commodities, such as cantaloupe, eggplant, grapes, green beans, pears, plums, watermelon, and winter squash are from domestic growers part of the year and are imported during the remaining months. Comparisons of selected residues detected in im ported versus domestic winter squash, grapes, and cantaloupe can be found in Appendix L.
Overall, samples of domes tic winter squash had higher percent detections than those from Mexico. Samples of grapes from Chile and cantaloupes from Central America showed higher percent detections than the respective domestic samples. These sample sets were selected to compare data where residues are present in greater than10 percent of the commodity and allow comparison of individual residues. These data al so showed that the residue profile for domestic and imported crops was significantly different.
The winter squash data in Appendix L indicate that in 2005, residues were detected in 43.4 percent of the domestic samples and 38.0 percent of the Mexican samples. Dieldrin was detected in almost 12 percent of the domestic samples but was not detected in any of the samples from Mexico. Endosulfan sulfate was detected more frequentlyin the Mexican winter squash samples (22.1%) than domestic winter squash samples (11.3%). Ortho-phenylphenol was detected at similar rates in both the domestic and Mexican winter squash samples (19.1% and 20.0% respectively).
For grapes, 87.6 percent of the Chilean samples and 63.9 percent of the domestic samples had residues detected in 2004-2005. Captan, chlorpyrifos, cyprodinil, flud ioxonil, and iprodione were detected more often in the imported grape samples than the domestic grape samples. For example, captan residues were detected in 41.2 percent of the Chilean grape samples comparedto 2.5 percent of the domestic samples. Conversely, ethephon and myclobutanil were detected more often in the domestic grape samples than in the Chilean grape samples. Ethephon residues were detected in 17.3 percent of the Chilean samples compared to 57.0 percent of the domestic grape samples. Imidacloprid was detected at similar rates in both the domestic (15.8%) and Chilean grape samples (14.0%).
For cantaloupe, 37.5 per cent of the domestic product had residues compared to 74.6 percentof the Central American (Costa Rica, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua) samples in 2003-2005. Cantaloupe samples from CentralAmerica had more residues of endosulfan sulfate and methomyl than samples from the U.S.

♦ National Estimates
National estimates for selected pesticide/ commodity pairs are shown in Appendix M. In most cases for each pair, the levels of detectedPesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 27 

## residues are a small fraction of the tolerance level. A range of values for the average sample residue concentration (mean) for each pair is provided. The lower value for the range is determined by treating a sample without detectable residues as if it had a residue concentration equal to zero. The upper value is determined by treating such a sample as if it had a residue concentration equal to the LOD. Calculations for the 50th, 75th, and 90th percentiles for each of the selected pairs are shown. The ratio of the 90th percentile to the to lerance, as a normalization factor, is also prov ided. Percent detectionsand percentiles for apples, cantaloupe, cauliflower, eggplant, grapefruit, grapes, lettuce, oranges, pears, plums, strawberries, and winter squash were weighted to reflect monthlyvariations in marketing. No weighting adjustments were made for frozen green beans, heavy cream, milk, orange juice, soybeans, or wheat.
Appendix N displays the estimated distributions of 12 representative pesticide/commodity pairs. These graphs depict that the overwhelming majority of pesticide testing results and the respective means (average values) are at low concentrations. The range of values, the median at the 50th percentile, and the range in percentile representing the lower and upper bound for the sample mean are shown on each chart. Thepesticide/commodity pairs included in Appendix N are thiabendazole/apples, imidacloprid/ cauliflower, imazalil/grapefruit, vinclozolin/ frozen green beans, imazalil/oranges, DCPA/ lettuce, azinphos methyl/pears, iprodione/ plums, captan/strawberries, THPI/strawberries, DDE p,p’/heavy cream, and malathion/wheat. In some cases, there is convergence of the mean upper and lower bound into a single line due to the insignificant differences between them (e.g., captan/strawberries).

♦ Soybean Rust/Aphid Results
In 2005, PDP conducted a special survey of compounds used on soybeans to treat rust and the Chinese aphid. The GIPSA laboratory analyzed more than 300 samples for 14 fungicides used to treat soybean rust and 2 insecticides used to control the Chinese aphid. The fungicide pyraclostrobin was detected in 2 percent of the samples. The highest residue detected was 2 parts per billion (ppb) or 5 percent of the tolerance for pyraclostrobin. No other compounds were detected. Appendix D provides the results fo r the soybean special survey.

♦ Postharvest Applications
Pesticides can be app lied before and after harvest depending on the crop and approved label use. PDP data capture both preharvest and postharvest uses because samples are collected at points when all pestic ide applications have already occurred. Pesticides applied postharvest are used primarily as fungicides, but someinsecticides and sprouting inhibitors are important postharvest crop treatments. Some detections reported in Appendix B were most likely generated by postharvest applications to the raw agricultural commodity.

♦ Environmental Contaminants

DDT, DDD, and DDE
A total of 9,417 fruit and vegetable (Appendix B), 522 soybean (Appendix C), 674 wheat (Appendix E), 746 milk samples (Appendix F), 369 heavy cream samples (Appendix G), and 352 pork adipose samples (Appendix H) were screened for DDE p,p’, a metabolite of DDT. Other DDT metabolites measured only in fruit and vegetables and pork adipose include DDD o,p’ and DDD p,p’. Use of DDT has been prohibited in the U.S. since 1972; however, due to its persistence in the environment, residues of the DDE p,p’ metabolite were detected in 1.2 percent (112 detections in 9,417 samples) of the fruit and vegetable samples tested. Residues of DDE p,p’ were found in green beans (1.1%), lettuce (14.7%), winter squash (0.1%), milk (85.4%), heavy cream (86.7%), and pork adipose (7.1%). The hi ghest residue of DDE p,p’ found in heavy cream was 37 ppb or 3 percent of the establishe d action level. Residues of DDT o,p’ and DDT p,p’ were detected inPesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 28 

## lettuce (0.6% and 0.4% re spectively). Residues of DDT p,p’ were detected in cauliflower (0.1%) and winter squash (0.5%). These finding are largely attributable to the recent improvements in analytical technologies and associated lower detection limits. All detections of DDT and its metabolites were well below the established action levels.

OTHER EXTRANEOUS PESTICIDES

In 1974, all aldrin and dieldrin uses were canceled in the U.S., an d in 1978, all heptachlor uses were canceled. In 1986, chlordane uses, except termiticide uses, were canceled. Despite these cancellations and due to their persistence in the environment, residues of dieldrin were detected in cantaloupe, watermelon, winter squash, milk, and heavy cream in 2005. Dieldrin was found in 33.1 per cent of heavy creamsamples, 23.2 percent of milk samples, 6.6 percent of winter squash samples, 1.3 percent of cantaloupe samples, and less than 1 percent of the watermelon samples. One percent of wintersquash contained heptachlor epoxide, a metabolite of heptachlor. Cis and trans chlordane were detected in 1.5 and 1 percent of the winter squash samples, respectively. All detections were below the established action levels. No residues of aldrin were detected in fruit and vegetables, pork, or soyb eans. Oxychlordane, a chlordane metabolite, was not detected in any of the 1,796 fruit or vegetable samples analyzed.

♦ Multiple Pesticide Residue Detections
By virtue of the MRMs employed, PDP provides novel data that can be used by EPA in evaluating exposure to multiple residues from the same commodity. The data are crucial forassessments which consider cumulative exposure to pesticides determined to have common mechanisms of toxicity. The distribution of multiple pesticides occurring in samples tested during 2005 is presented in Appendix O.
These data indicate that approximately 34 percent of all samples tested contained no detectable pesticides [parent compound and metabolite(s) are combined], 30 percent contained 1 pesticide, and 36 percent contained more than 1 pesticide. Parent compounds and their metabolites are co mbined to report the number of “pesticides” rather than the number of “residues,” as was reported in summaries prior to 2003. For example, a sample with positive detections for Endosulfan I, II, and sulfate would have been counted as three residues in the 2002 Appendix L. That sample would be counted as just one pesticide detected in this Summary’s Appendix O.
Most multiple residue detections result from the application of more than one pesticide on a crop during a growing season; however, a number of other factor s could contribute tomultiple detections. Pesticide spray drift, residue transfer through crop rotation, crosscontamination at packi ng facilities, and/orpresence of persistent environmental contaminants could all contribute to residue detections.

♦ Tolerance Violations

A tolerance is defined under Section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act as the maximum quantity of a pesticide residue allowable on a raw agricultural commodity. Tolerances are also applicable to processed foods. EPA is in the process of reassessing tolerances under the health-based standards of FQPA. A tolerance violation occurs when a residue is found that exc eeds the tolerance level or when a residue is found for which there is no established tolerance. With the exception of meat, poultry, and egg products, for which USDA is responsible, FDA enforces tolerances for all imported and domestic foods that movethrough interstate commerce. Unlike enforcement programs, PDP emphasizes determination of residues at the lowest detectable levels ratherthan quick turn-around times. When PDP identifies samples with residues exceeding the tolerance or with residues for which there is no established tolerance, these detections are reported to FDA regional and headquarters’ offices. This notification is made in accordance with a Memorandum of Understanding betweenPesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 29 

## USDA and FDA for the purpose of pinpointing areas where closer surveillance may be needed. FDA enforcement action has not been a practical response to PDP analysis because of the time required between sample collection and data reporting.
Residues exceeding the established tolerance are noted with an “X” in Appendices B, C, D, E, F, G, and H. Similarly, residues for which a tolerance is not estab lished are noted with a “V.” The “X” and “V” annotations are followed by a number indicating the number of samples reported to FDA.
An established tolerance may apply to more than one residue because pesticides may break down into more than one metabolite or containmore than one isomer. For example, the tolerance for endosulfan combines residues of endosulfan I, endosulfan II, and endosulfan sulfate; and organophosphate tolerances may combine the parent compound and the sulfone and sulfoxide metabolites. Therefore, where applicable, the violatio ns in Appendix P are combined residues of parent and any isomers and/or metabolites to co unt the total number of samples with tolerance violations.
Excluding samples for which no tolerances are set (bottled water and drinking water), residues exceeding the tolerance were detected in 0.2 percent of the 13,621 samples tested in 2005 – 25 samples with 1 residue each. Residues with no established toleran ce were found in 4.2 percent of the samples (570 samples with 1 residue each, and 2 samples with 2 residues each). In most cases, these residues were detected at very low le vels and some residues may have resulted from spray drift or crop rotations. The residue levels and commodities are listed in Appendix P.

♦ Bottled Water Results

Bottled water is the second most consumed beverage in the United States. Due to its high consumption, PDP began testing bottled water in 2005. Bottled water is regulated as a packaged food product by the FDA and State regulatory agencies. FDA is adopting EPA’s MCLs for municipal water systems as its Standards of Quality (SOQs) for bottled water. Bottled water meets similar standards as municipal water systems.
Bottled water can come from many sources. Waters sampled by PDP included water which was purified from muni cipal sources, spring water, well water, and melt water from glaciers. It is not required for bottled water to identify a specific source on the label, but bottlers must adhere to the FDA St andard of Identity regulations that provide uniform definitions for the following bottled water classifications: bottled, drinking, artesi an, ground, distilled, deionized, reverse osmosis, mineral, purified, sparkling, spring, sterile , and well water. Ninety different brands of bottled water were sampled in 2005. These included small local brands of bottled waters as well as nationally sold brands. Some bottling companies may have multiple sources for their water and may list them on the label. Sampling these major brands of bottled water from various locations across the country allows PDP to obtain samples from these multiple sources. Due to its weight and shipping cost, most bottled water comes from domestic sources; however, 55 samples were imports from Canada, Fiji, France, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom.
PDP analyzed 378 bottled water samples using multiresidue methods to test for 82 pesticides and metabolites. Fourteen different residues from 7 different pesticides were detected in 16 percent of the bottled water samples. All but one of the detections was of commonly used herbicides and their metabolites. One fungicide was detected in a single sample. Appendix I provides a distribution of residues detected in bottled water.

Table 5 shows the residues which were detected in the bottled water sampled by PDP in 2005. The bulk of the residue de tections occurred in spring waters while only 12% of the samples purified from municipal sources contained anyPesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 30

## detectable residues. Most samples with detectable residues contained only a single pesticide or metabolite. A few of the samples contained multiple residues with a maximum of seven detectable residues within a given sample. All detections were well below any established EPA MCLs and Health Advisories (HAs).

♦ Drinking Water Results
Figure 8 shows the distribution of drinking water sites for the 2005 PDP testing program. Untreated and finished drinking water samples were collected from community water systems in California, Florida, Louisiana, Michigan,North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Washington. E ach watershed reflectsthe local topography, watershed size, geomorphology, soil types, geology, land use, land management practices, crop varieties, pesticides applied, and applicatio n methods. Due to the complexities associated with water quality assessments, these data reflect only the unique characteristics of the watersheds from which the samples were obtained.
PDP analyzed 750 water samples from community water systems using MRMs to test for more than 200 pesticides and metabolites. Treatment plants participating in the 2005 survey draw from surface water as their primary source waters. The data presented here are for the untreated water collected at treatment plant intakes and treated water (post-disinfection) collected just prior to di stribution to customers. Forty-eight different resi dues were detected in the untreated intake water and 43 in the finished water. Most of the detections were of commonly used herbicides and their metabolites

. The majority of pesticides included in the PDP testing profiles were not detected and none of the detections in the finished water samples exceeded EPA MCLs or HA levels.
Appendix J lists the MCL and/or HA values; however, many of the compounds in the PDP testing profiles do not have established regulatory standards. For comparative purposes, EPA FAO criteria, which are much lower than human-based MCLs or HAs, are also given. These criteria are lower than MCL or HA levels due primarily to higher exposure to these compounds because aquatic organisms live all or most of their lives in water. During 2005, no detections exceeded established FAO levels. Additional information re garding EPA drinking water standards is avai lable at: http://www.epa. gov/safewater/standard/setting.html

. Water treatment technologies vary widely and may be based on the local water chemistry, targeted contaminants needing removal, and cost. Appendix J shows the concentration of detected residues in treated and untreated water.

Bottled Water Source Number of Samples Collected Number of Samples with Residues Number of Residues Detected Origin

Artesian 1 1 2 Domestic
Glacier 2 1 1 Canada Groundwater 20 1 1 Fiji Purified Drinking Water 102 7 1-4 Domestic Spring Water 231 47 1-7 U.S., Canada, France
Unknown Source 22 2 1-2 Domestic 

## Table 5. Origin of Bottled Water Samples and Number of Residues Detected. PDP analyzed 378 bottled water samples using multiresidue methods to test for 82 pesticides and metabolites. Fourteen different residues from 7 different pesticid es were detected in 16 percent of the bottled water samples. All but one of the detecti ons were of commonly used herbicides and their metabolites. One fungicide was detected in a single sample. Appendix I provides a distribution of residues detected in bottled water.Pesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 31 

## In most cases, there were more detections in the untreated water than the treated water. In a few cases, residues detected in the treated water were not detected in the untreated water. The data acquired to date indicate that the water treatment process removed matrix interferences, allowing for a more sensitive measurement in the treated water. Depending on the treatment process employed, individual pest icides are entirely, partially, or not removed during the treatment process.
The data clearly show seasonal inputs in many cases, such as atrazine. Figure 10 depicts results for atrazine in finished drinking water at two North Carolina sites, 5002 and 5003, and for two sites in northwestern Ohio and two sites in southeastern Michigan. In the first graph, site 5003 shows seasonal variations, while for site 5002, there is no marked seasonal input but rather a continual year-round input. The second graph shows that for site s in northwestern Ohio and southeastern Mich igan, higher concentrations were detected in summer months when atrazine is heavily appl ied, but again, there is asteady input year-round. These observations convey the importance of year-round monitoring.

♦ Synopsis

A total of 10,154 fresh and processed fruit and vegetable samples, 668 soybean samples, 306 soybean rust/aphid survey samples, 674 wheat samples, 746 milk samples, 369 heavy cream samples, 704 pork samples, 378 bottled water samples, and 750 drinking water samples wereanalyzed for various pesticides including insecticides, herbicides, and fungicides. MRMs were used to detect a wide variety of compounds including carbamates, conazoles, imidazoles, organochlorines, organophosphates, phenoxy acid herbicides, pyrethroi ds, strobilurins, and triazines.
Excluding drinking water, approximately 84 percent of all samples tested were domestic, 14 percent were imports, 1 percent was of mixed origin, and 1 percent was of unknown origin. Approximately 21 percent of the orange juice samples were of mixed national origin.
Overall, 73 percent of fr esh fruit and vegetables and 61 percent of processe d fruit and vegetables showed detectable residu es. More residues were detected in fresh produce than in processed products and grains. Residues detected in dairyproducts and pork samples were primarily lowlevel residues of unavoidable environmental contaminants including DDE p,p’ and dieldrin. Additionally, low levels of diphenylamine were detected in dairy products.
Excluding drinking water, 34 percent of samples tested contained no detectable pesticides [parent compound and metabolite(s) are combined], 30 percent contained 1 pesticide, and 36 percent contained more than 1 pe sticide. Low levels of environmental contaminants were detected in cantaloupe, cauliflower, green beans, heavycream, lettuce, milk, pork, watermelon, and winter squash at concentrations well below levels that trigger regulatory actions.
Excluding samples for which no tolerances are set (bottled water and drinking water), residues exceeding the tolerance were detected in 0.2 percent of the 13,621 samples tested in 2005 – 25 samples with 1 residue each. Residues with no established tolerance were found in 4.2 percent of the samples (570 samples with 1 residue each, and 2 samples with 2 residues each). In most cases, these residues were detected at very low levels and some residues may have resulted from spray drift or crop rotations.
In finished drinking water, PDP detected low levels (measured in parts per trillion) of some pesticides, primarily widely used herbicides. Forty-eight different resi dues were detected in the untreated intake water and 43 in the treated water. The majority of pesticides, metabolites, and isomers included in the PDP testing profiles were not detected. None of the detections in the finished water samples exceeded established EPA MCL or HA levels or established FAO criteria.Pesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 32 

## Atrazine

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600



## Jan-05 Apr-05 Jul-05 Oct-05 MI 5001
MI 5002
OH 5003
OH 5004



## Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-DecConcentration in parts per trillion (ppt) 

## 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45



## Jan-05 Apr-05 Jul-05 Oct-05 NC 5002

NC 5003Concentration in parts per trillion (ppt)



## Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec

Figure 10. Seaonality of Pesticides in Finished Drinking Water Samples. Results are depicted for atrazine in finished drinking water at two North Carolina sites, 5002 and 5003, and for two sites in northwestern Ohio and two sites in southeastern Michigan. In the first gr aph, site 5003 shows seasonal variations, while for site 5002, there is no marked seasonal input but rather a continual year-round input. The second graph shows that for sites in northwestern Ohio and southeastern Michigan, higher concentrations were detected in summer months when atrazine is heavily applied, but again, there is a steady input year-round.Pesticide Data Program—Annual Summary, Calendar Year 2005 33 

# ♦♦♦♦♦

The U.S. Department of Agricult ure (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial st atus, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, po litical beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is deriv ed from any public assistance program (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs. ) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (B raille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720 -2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of di scrimination, write to US DA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S. W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or ca ll (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720- 6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

# Appendix A

Commodity History

Appendix A identifie s commodities sampled by the Pesticide Data Program through December 2006. Updates to this list are posted on the PDP Web site at http:// www.ams.usda.gov/pdp

.

## Fresh Commodities

Commodit y Start Date End Date
Apples 1 

## Sep-91 Dec-96 Apples (S-1) Jan-99 Dec-99 Apples (S-2) Jan-99 May-99 Apples Oct-00 Sep-02 Apples Jan-04 Dec-05 Apples (T-1) Jan-03 Dec-03 Asparagus Jan-02 Jun-03 Bananas Sep-91 Sep-95 Bananas Jan-01 Dec-02 Bananas Jan-06 Ongoing Bananas (TSP) Jul-03 Dec-03 Broccoli Oct-92 Dec-94 Broccoli Jan-01 Dec-02 Broccoli Oct-06 Ongoing Cantaloupe Jul-98 Jun-00 Cantaloupe Oct-03 Sep-05
Carrots 1 

## Oct-92 Sep-96 Carrots Oct-00 Sep-02 Carrots Jan-06 Ongoing Cauliflower Oct-04 Sep-06 Celery Feb-92 Mar-94 Celery Jan-01 Dec-02
Cherries 2 

## May-00 Aug-01 Cucumbers Jan-99 Dec-00 Cucumbers Oct-02 Sep-04 Eggplant Jan-05 Dec-06 Eggs (TSP) Jul-03 Dec-03 Grapefruit Aug-91 Dec-93 Grapefruit Jan-05 Dec-06 Grapes 1 

## May-91 Dec-96 Grapes Jan-00 Dec-01 Grapes (TSP) Jul-03 Dec-03 Grapes Jan-04 Dec-05 

## COMMODITY HISTORY AS OF DECEMBER 2006

Appendix A. Page 1 of 5

## Commodit y Start Date End Date Green Beans Feb-92 Dec-95 Green Beans Jan-00 Dec-01 Green Beans Apr-04 Mar-05 Greens (collard & kale) Oct-06 Ongoing Lettuce May-91 Dec-94 Lettuce Oct-99 Sep-01 Lettuce Jan-04 Dec-05 Mushrooms Oct-01 Sep-03
Nectarines 3 

## Jul-00 Sep-01 Onions Jan-02 Dec-03 Oranges 1 

## Aug-91 Dec-96 Oranges Jan-00 Dec-01 Oranges Jan-04 Dec-05 Peaches Feb-92 Sep-96 Peaches (S-3) Jan-00 Sep-00
Peaches 4 

## Jan-01 Sep-02 Peaches Oct-06 Ongoing Peaches (T-1) May-03 Sep-03 Pears Jan-97 Jun-99 Pears (S-1) Jul-98 Jun-99 Pears Oct-03 Sep-05 Pineapples Jul-00 Jun-02 Plums Jan-05 Dec-06 Potatoes May-91 Dec-95 Potatoes (S-4) Dec-96 Dec-97 Potatoes Jul-00 Jun-02 Spinach 1 

## Jan-95 Sep-97 Spinach Jul-02 Dec-03 Spinach Jan-06 Ongoing
Strawberries 5 

## Jan-98 Sep-00 Strawberries Jan-04 Dec-05 Sweet Bell Peppers Jan-99 Dec-00 Sweet Bell Peppers Oct-02 Sep-04
Sweet Potatoes 1 

## Jan-96 Jun-98 Sweet Potatoes Jan-03 Dec-04

Appendix A. Page 2 of 5

## Commodit y Start Date End Date
Tomatoes 1 

## Jul-96 Jun-99 Tomatoes Jan-03 Dec-04
Watermelon 6 

## Oct-05 Sep-06 Summer Squash Oct-06 Ongoing Winter Squash 5 

## Jan-97 Jun-99 Winter Squash Jul-04 Jun-06

1 

### Excludes sampling hiatus September - November 1996.

2 

### Sampling adjusted for market availability. Cherries were sampled for two years (May-00 - Aug-01) for a total of six months.

3 

### Sampling adjusted for market availability. Nectarines were sampled for two years (Jul-00 - Sep-01) for a total of six months.

4 

### Sam p lin g ad j usted for market availabilit y . Peaches were sam p led for two y ear s (Jan-01 - Sep-02) for a total of sixteen months.

5 

### Frozen collected when fresh unavailable.
6 

### Sam p les collected in California, Florida, and Texas onl y

.

(S-1) Special single serving project testing for organophosphates. (S-2) Special single serving project testing for carbamates. (S-3) Special single serving project testing for carbamate, organochlorine, organophosphate, organonitrogen, and sulfur compounds. (S-4) Special single serving project testing for aldicarb. (T-1) Triazole parent and metabolite compounds only. (TSP) Triazole Sampling Project. Samples sent to contract laboratory.

Appendix A. Page 3 of 5

## Processed Commodities
Commodit y Start Date End Date Apple Juice 1 

## Jul-96 Dec-98 Apple Juice Jan-02 Dec-02 Applesauce Jul-02 Dec-02 Applesauce Jan-06 Dec-06 Asparagus, Canned Jul-03 Dec-03 Corn Syrup 2 

## Jan-98 Jun-99 Grape Juice Jan-98 Dec-99 Green Beans, Canned/Frozen 1 

## Jan-96 Jun-98 Green Beans, Canned Jan-03 Mar-04 Green Beans, Frozen Apr-05 Dec-05 Orange Juice Jan-97 Dec-98 Orange Juice Oct-04 Sep-06 Peaches, Canned Dec-96 Dec-97 Peaches, Canned Jan-03 Dec-04 Peaches, Canned (T-1) Jan-03 Mar-03 Peaches, Canned (T-1) Oct-03 Dec-03 Peanut Butter Jan-00 Dec-00 Peanut Butter Jan-06 Dec-06 Peanut Butter (TSP) Jul-03 Dec-03 Pear Juice, Concentrate/Puree Jul-02 Jun-03 Pears, Canned Jul-99 Jun-00 Peas, Canned/Frozen Apr-94 Jun-96 Peas, Canned/Frozen 3 

## Oct-01 Sep-03 Peas, Frozen Jan-06 Ongoing Potatoes, Frozen Jan-06 Ongoing Raisins Jul-06 Ongoing Spinach, Canned Oct-97 Dec-98 Spinach, Frozen Jan-99 Dec-99 Spinach, Canned Jan-04 Jun-04 Strawberries, Frozen 4 

## Jan-98 Sep-00 Sweet Corn, Canned/Frozen Apr-94 Mar-96 Sweet Corn, Canned/Frozen 3 

## Oct-01 Sep-03 Tomato Paste, Canned Jan-01 Jun-01 Tomatoes, Canned Jul-99 Jun-00 Winter Squash, Frozen 4 

## Jan-97 Jun-99

1 

### Excludes sampling hiatus September - November 1996
2 

### Excludes sampling hiatus January 1999
3 

### Canned samples collected in first year and frozen samples in second year of testing.
4 

### Frozen collected when fresh unavailable (T-1) Triazole parent and metabolite compounds only. (TSP) Triazole Sampling Project. Samples sent to contract laboratory.

Appendix A. Page 4 of 5

## Grains Commodit y Start Date End Date Barley Oct-01 Sep-03 Corn Oct-06 Ongoing Oats Jul-99 Apr-00 Rice Oct-00 Sep-02 Soybeans Sep-96 Feb-98 Soybeans Oct-03 Sep-05 Soybean Rust/Aphid Oct-05 Dec-05 Wheat Feb-95 Jan-98 Wheat Sep-04 Aug-06 Wheat Flour Jan-03 Dec-04 Wheat Flour (T-1) Jan-03 Dec-03



## Dairy Commodit y Start Date End Date
Butter Jan-03 Dec-03 Heavy Cream Jul-05 Dec-05 Milk 1 

## Jan-96 Oct-98 Milk (TSP) Jul-03 Dec-03 Milk Jan-04 Dec-05



## Drinking Water States Start Date End Date California, New York Mar-01 Dec-03 Colorado, Kansas, Texas May-02 Dec-03 Oregon, Pennsylvania Jan-04 Dec-04 Michigan, North Carolina, Ohio, Washington Jan-04 Ongoing California, Florida Jan-05 Dec-05 Louisiana, North Dakota, Pennsylvania Jan-05 Ongoing Bottled Water - Ten Participating States Jan-05 Dec-06


## Meat / Poultry Products Commodit y Type Start Date End Date Poultry Young Chickens Apr-00 Mar-01 Poultry Young & Mature Chickens Jan-06 Ongoing Beef Cows, Heifers, Steers Jun-01 Jul-02 Pork Gilt, Barrow Jan-05 Jun-05

1 

### Excludes sam p lin g hiatus Se p tember - November 1996
(T-1) Triazole parent and metabolite compounds only. (TSP) Triazole Sampling Project. Samples sent to contract laboratory.

Appendix A. Page 5 of 5

# Appendix B

Distribution of Residues by Pesticide in Fruit and Vegetables

Appendix B shows residue detections fo r all fruit and vegetable pesticide/ commodity pairs tested, including range ofvalues detected, range of Limits of Detection (LODs), Environmental Protec tion Agency (EPA) tolerances, and Codex Maximum Residue Limit/Extraneous Maximum Residue Limit (MRL/EMRL) references for each pair.
In 2005, 10,154 fruit and vegetable samples were analyzed, of which 8,702 were fresh product and 1,452 were processed product.
PDP reports tolerance violations to t he Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as part of an interagency Memorandum of U nderstanding between the U.S. Department of Agriculture and FDA. Residues reported to FDA are shown in the “ Pesticide/ Commodity ” column to the right of the commodity and are annotated as “ X” (if the residue exceeded the established tolerance) or “ V” [if the residue did not have a tolerance listed in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 40, Part 180]. In both cases, these annotations are followed by a number indicating t he number of samples reported to FDA.
Action levels (ALs) are shown in this appendix, where applicable, and denote Action Level values established by FDA and/or Extraneous Maximum Residue Levels (EMRLs) established by the Codex Al imentarious Commission. Under FQPA, responsibility for establishing tolerances in lieu of action levels has been transferred to EPA. In the interim, action levels are used.

Data to establish Codex MRLs are eval uated by the Food and Agriculture/World Health Organization-sponsored Joint Meeting on Pesticide Residues (JMPR) based on toxicology, residue occurrence in crops de termined by supervised field trials, and dietary exposure. The Codex Committee on Pestici de Residues (CCPR) meets annually to discuss proposed MRLs and recommends approval to the Codex Alimentarius Commission. This means that Codex MRLs r epresent levels that are considered safe to humans. MRLs/EMRLs shown in this appendix are from the Codex Alimentarius: Proc. of Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues , 38 th 

## Session, April 3-8, 2006, Fortaleza, Brazil. Only C odex MRLs (CXLs) are listed.
The information herein is only intended to be an initial reference. Readers are reminded that international regulations and MRLs may change and that it is important that information obtained from this table be verified with knowledgeable parties in the market of interest prior to sale or shipment of exports.Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm Acephate (insecticide ) Apples 743 0 0.002 ^ 0.02 - Cantaloupe (X-1 ) 558 2 0.4 0.020 - 0.21 0.002 - 0.005 0.02 - Eggplant (X-6 ) 736 8 1.1 0.008 - 0.30 0.005 ^ 0.02 - Grapefrui t 742 0 0.002 - 0.004 0.02 - Grapes 739 0 0.002 - 0.005 0.02 - Green Beans 181 38 21.0 0.003 - 3.0 0.002 - 0.005 3 - Green Beans, Frozen 555 149 26.8 0.003 - 0.88 0.002 - 0.005 3 - Lettuce 743 60 8.1 0.003 - 0.090 0.002 - 0.003 10 - Orange Juice 744 4 0.5 0.003 ^ 0.002 ^ 0.02 - Oranges 741 0 0.002 ^ 0.02 - Pears 555 0 0.002 - 0.015 0.02 - Plums 573 0 0.005 ^ 0.02 - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.005 ^ 0.02 - Strawberries 737 0 0.001 - 0.002 0.02 - Watermelon (X-1) 182 2 1.1 0.003 - 0.71 0.002 - 0.005 0.02 - Winter Squash (X-1) 731 4 0.5 0.003 - 0.051 0.002 - 0.005 0.02 - TOTA L 9,413 267

Acetamiprid (insecticide) Apples 260 182 70.0 0.001 - 0.13 0.0006 ^ 1.0 - Cauliflowe r 741 7 0.9 0.001 - 0.005 0.0006 ^ 1.20 - Lettuce 527 83 15.7 0.001 - 0.27 0.0006 ^ 3.00 - TOTA L 1,528 272

Acibenzolar S methyl (plant activator ) Apples 528 0 0.007 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.007 ^ 1.0 - Lettuce 527 0 0.007 ^ 0.25 - TOTA L 1,796 0

Alachlor (herbicide) Cantaloupe 396 0 0.016 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.016 ^ NT - TOTA L 914 0

Aldicarb (insecticide) Apples 528 0 0.0003 - 0.001 NT - Cantaloupe 396 0 0.020 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.0003 - 0.001 NT - Grapefrui t 214 0 0.007 ^ 0.3 0.2 Grapes 523 0 0.010 ^ NT 0.2 Green Beans 127 0 0.020 ^ NT - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.020 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.0003 - 0.001 NT - Orange Juice 744 0 0.007 - 0.010 0.3 0.2 Oranges 719 0 0.007 - 0.010 0.3 0.2 Pears 394 0 0.010 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.010 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.020 ^ NT - TOTA L 5,890 0

Aldicarb sulfone (metabolite of Aldicarb) Apples 513 0 0.0009 - 0.003 NT - Cantaloupe 396 0 0.038 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 725 0 0.003 ^ NT - Grapefrui t 719 0 0.009 - 0.012 0.3 0.2 Green Beans 127 0 0.020 ^ NT - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.020 ^ NT -



## APPENDIX B. DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDUES BY PESTICIDE IN FRUIT AND VEGETABLES

Appendix B. Page 1 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm
Lettuce 498 0 0.0009 - 0.003 NT - Orange Juice 744 0 0.009 - 0.010 0.3 0.2 Oranges 741 0 0.009 - 0.010 0.3 0.2 Watermelon 64 0 0.010 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.038 ^ NT - TOTA L 5,440 0

Aldicarb sulfoxide (metabolite of Aldicarb ) Apples 411 0 0.0003 - 0.003 NT - Cantaloupe 396 0 0.038 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 342 0 0.001 - 0.004 NT - Grapefrui t 214 0 0.005 ^ 0.3 0.2 Grapes 523 0 0.010 ^ NT 0.2 Green Beans 127 0 0.020 ^ NT - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.020 ^ NT - Lettuce 468 0 0.0003 - 0.003 NT - Orange Juice 744 9 1.2 0.008 ^ 0.005 - 0.010 0.3 0.2 Oranges 741 2 0.3 0.008 - 0.025 0.005 - 0.010 0.3 0.2 Pears 394 0 0.010 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.010 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.038 ^ NT - TOTA L 5,337 11

Aldrin (insecticide) (parent of Dieldrin) Apples 743 0 0.003 - 0.024 0.03 AL 0.05 Cantaloupe 162 0 0.003 - 0.008 0.1 AL 0.1 Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.007 - 0.024 0.03 AL - Eggplan t 736 0 0.006 ^ 0.05 AL - Grapefrui t 742 0 0.003 - 0.008 0.02 AL 0.05 Grapes 523 0 0.002 ^ 0.05 AL - Green Beans 181 0 0.002 - 0.008 0.05 AL 0.05 Green Beans, Frozen 555 0 0.002 - 0.008 0.05 AL 0.05 Lettuce 743 0 0.003 - 0.024 0.03 AL 0.05 Orange Juice 744 0 0.003 - 0.008 0.02 AL 0.05 Oranges 741 0 0.003 - 0.008 0.02 AL 0.05 Pears 555 0 0.002 - 0.008 0.03 AL 0.05 Plums 573 0 0.006 ^ 0.3 AL - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.006 ^ 0.3 AL - Watermelon 182 0 0.002 - 0.003 0.1 AL 0.1 Winter Squash 213 0 0.003 - 0.008 0.1 AL 0.1 TOTA L 8,287 0

Allethrin (insecticide) Apples 215 0 0.010 ^ E X

- Cantaloupe 558 0 0.010 - 0.016 4 - Grapefrui t 742 0 0.010 - 0.040 E X

- Grapes 739 0 0.010 - 0.015 4 - Orange Juice 744 0 0.010 ^ E X

- Oranges 741 0 0.010 ^ E X

- Pears 555 0 0.010 - 0.015 E X

- Plums 573 0 0.021 ^ 4 - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.021 ^ 4 - Watermelon 64 0 0.015 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.016 ^ NT - TOTA L 5,602 0

Ametryn (herbicide ) Orange Juice 528 0 0.010 ^ NT - Oranges 525 0 0.010 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.010 ^ NT - TOTA L 1,117 0

Appendix B. Page 2 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm
Anilazine (fungicide) Green Beans 127 0 0.023 ^ NT - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.023 ^ NT - TOTA L 522 0

Atrazine (herbicide) Apples 528 0 0.002 - 0.006 NT - Cantaloupe 396 0 0.024 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.002 - 0.006 NT - Grapes 523 0 0.008 ^ NT - Green Beans 127 0 0.015 ^ NT - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.015 ^ NT - Lettuce (V-1) 527 1 0.2 0.006 ^ 0.002 ^ NT - Orange Juice 528 0 0.010 ^ NT - Oranges 525 0 0.010 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.008 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.008 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.024 ^ NT - TOTA L 5,266 1

Azinphos methyl (insecticide ) Apples 743 234 31.5 0.013 - 0.33 0.008 - 0.012 1.5 2 Cantaloupe 558 0 0.008 - 0.012 2.0 0.2 Eggplan t 736 1 0.1 0.007 ^ 0.004 ^ 0.3 0.5 Grapefrui t 214 0 0.008 ^ 2.0 1 Grapes 524 2 0.4 0.013 - 0.018 0.008 - 0.011 4.0 1 Green Beans 181 0 0.005 - 0.008 2.0 0.5 Green Beans, Frozen 555 0 0.005 - 0.008 2.0 0.5 Lettuce 527 0 0.012 ^ NT 0.5 Orange Juice 744 0 0.008 ^ 2.0 1 Oranges 741 0 0.008 ^ 2.0 1 Pears 555 139 25.0 0.013 - 0.33 0.008 - 0.011 1.5 2 Plums 573 32 5.6 0.007 - 0.10 0.004 ^ 2.0 2 Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 2 1.3 0.007 - 0.060 0.004 ^ 2.0 2 Strawberries 216 1 0.5 0.20 ^ 0.008 ^ 2.0 1 Watermelon 182 0 0.008 - 0.012 2.0 0.2 Winter Squash 518 0 0.012 ^ NT 0.5 TOTA L 7,720 411

Azoxystrobin (fungicide ) Apples 468 0 0.002 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 666 0 0.002 ^ 30 - Grapefrui t 528 11 2.1 0.0004 - 0.002 0.0004 ^ 1.0 - Grapes 523 13 2.5 0.002 - 0.042 0.002 ^ 1.0 - Lettuce 485 15 3.1 0.003 - 2.2 0.002 ^ 30.0 - Orange Juice 528 0 0.010 ^ 1.0 - Oranges 504 0 0.010 ^ 1.0 - Pears 394 0 0.002 ^ NT - Watermelon 182 0 0.0005 - 0.020 0.30 - TOTA L 4,278 39

Bendiocarb (insecticide)

Apples 743 0 0.002 - 0.040 SU - Cantaloupe 162 0 0.002 ^ SU - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.040 ^ SU - Eggplan t 736 0 0.010 ^ SU - Grapefrui t 719 0 0.002 - 0.010 SU - Grapes 739 0 0.002 - 0.005 SU - Lettuce 743 0 0.002 - 0.88 SU - Orange Juice 744 0 0.002 - 0.010 SU - Oranges 741 0 0.002 - 0.010 SU - Pears 555 0 0.002 - 0.005 SU - Plums 573 29 5.1 0.017 ^ 0.010 ^ SU -

Appendix B. Page 3 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.010 ^ SU - Strawberries 733 0 0.002 - 0.004 SU - Watermelon 182 0 0.002 - 0.016 SU - Winter Squash 213 0 0.002 ^ SU - TOTAL 8,477 29

Benfluralin (herbicide) Lettuce 216 0 0.020 ^ 0.05 - TOTA L 216 0

BHC alpha (insecticide)

Apples 743 0 0.002 - 0.007 0.05 AL - Cantaloupe 558 0 0.002 - 0.004 0.05 AL - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.007 ^ 0.05 AL - Eggplan t 736 0 0.004 ^ 0.05 AL - Grapefrui t 742 0 0.002 - 0.005 0.05 AL - Grapes 523 0 0.002 ^ 0.05 AL - Green Beans 127 0 0.0008 ^ 0.05 AL - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.0008 ^ 0.05 AL - Lettuce 743 0 0.002 - 0.007 0.05 AL - Orange Juice 744 0 0.002 ^ 0.05 AL - Oranges 741 0 0.002 ^ 0.05 AL - Pears 555 0 0.002 ^ 0.05 AL - Plums 573 0 0.003 ^ 0.05 AL - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.003 ^ 0.05 AL - Watermelon 182 0 0.002 ^ 0.05 AL - Winter Squash 731 0 0.002 - 0.004 0.05 AL - TOTA L 8,987 0

BHC beta (isomer of BHC alpha)

Green Beans 127 0 0.0008 ^ NT - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.0008 ^ NT - TOTA L 522 0

Bifenazate (acaricide)

Apples 215 0 0.020 ^ 0.75 1 Cantaloupe 396 0 0.013 ^ 0.75 0.3 Grapes 216 5 2.3 0.033 - 0.090 0.020 ^ 0.75 1 Pears 161 1 0.6 0.033 ^ 0.020 ^ 0.75 1 Strawberries 216 21 9.7 0.033 - 0.25 0.020 ^ 1.5 2 Watermelon 59 0 0.020 ^ 0.75 0.3 Winter Squash 731 0 0.013 - 0.034 0.75 0.7 TOTA L 1,994 27

Bifenthrin (insecticide)

Apples 743 0 0.003 - 0.010 0.05 - Cantaloupe 558 0 0.010 - 0.016 0.4 - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.003 ^ 0.6 - Eggplan t 736 1 0.1 0.047 ^ 0.028 ^ 0.05 - Grapefrui t 742 0 0.010 ^ 0.05 0.05 Grapes 739 1 0.1 0.018 ^ 0.010 - 0.011 0.2 - Green Beans 181 5 2.8 0.012 - 0.39 0.008 - 0.010 0.6 - Green Beans, Frozen 555 70 12.6 0.012 - 0.093 0.008 - 0.010 0.6 - Lettuce 743 0 0.003 - 0.010 3.0 - Orange Juice 744 0 0.010 ^ 0.05 0.05 Oranges 741 0 0.010 ^ 0.05 0.05 Pears 555 0 0.010 - 0.011 0.5 0.5 Plums 573 0 0.037 ^ 0.05 - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.037 ^ 0.05 - Strawberries 737 72 9.8 0.017 - 0.44 0.010 - 0.040 3.0 1 Watermelon 182 3 1.6 0.007 - 0.018 0.004 - 0.011 0.4 - Winter Squash 731 12 1.6 0.017 - 0.027 0.010 - 0.016 0.4 - TOTA L 10,154 164

Appendix B. Page 4 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm
Bitertanol (fungicide)

Watermelon 64 0 0.010 ^ NT - TOTA L 64 0

Boscalid (fungicide)

Apples 132 9 6.8 0.010 - 0.035 0.006 ^ 3.0 - Cantaloupe 396 0 0.039 ^ 1.6 - Cauliflowe r 682 0 0.006 ^ 3.0 - Lettuce 485 12 2.5 0.010 - 1.6 0.006 ^ 11.0 - Watermelon 182 0 0.003 - 0.010 1.6 - Winter Squash 518 1 0.2 0.065 ^ 0.039 ^ 1.6 - TOTA L 2,395 22

Bromacil (herbicide)

Grapefrui t 742 0 0.015 - 0.067 0.1 - Orange Juice 744 0 0.010 - 0.015 0.1 - Oranges 741 0 0.010 - 0.015 0.1 - TOTA L 2,227 0

Buprofezin (insecticide)

Apples 132 1 0.8 0.0002 ^ 0.0001 ^ 4 - Cantaloupe 162 0 0.015 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 216 0 0.0001 ^ NT - Eggplan t 736 0 0.029 ^ NT - Grapefrui t 742 0 0.0005 - 0.015 2.5 - Grapes 739 5 0.7 0.017 - 0.065 0.015 ^ 0.40 - Lettuce 333 0 0.0001 - 0.015 13 - Orange Juice 744 0 0.015 ^ 2.5 0.5 Oranges 741 0 0.015 ^ 2.5 0.5 Pears 394 0 0.015 ^ NT - Watermelon 182 0 0.012 - 0.015 0.5 - Winter Squash 213 0 0.015 ^ 0.50 - TOTA L 5,334 6

Butylate (herbicide )

Cantaloupe 308 0 0.016 ^ NT - Winter Squash 276 0 0.016 ^ NT - TOTA L 584 0

Captafol (fungicide) (parent of THPI) Cantaloupe 44 0 0.017 ^ NT - Grapes 523 0 0.015 ^ NT - Green Beans 127 0 0.030 ^ NT - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.030 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.015 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.015 ^ NT - Winter Squash 43 0 0.017 ^ NT - TOTA L 1,590 0

Captan (fungicide) (parent of THPI)

Apples 215 12 5.6 0.020 - 2.0 0.012 ^ 25 25 Cantaloupe 80 0 0.012 ^ 25 - Eggplan t 736 1 0.1 0.030 ^ 0.018 ^ 25 - Grapes 721 121 16.8 0.012 - 1.2 0.008 - 0.012 50 - Green Beans 127 5 3.9 0.008 - 0.46 0.005 ^ 25 - Green Beans, Frozen 412 0 0.005 - 0.012 25 - Lettuce 216 0 0.012 ^ 100 - Orange Juice 506 0 0.012 ^ NT - Oranges 525 0 0.012 ^ NT - Pears 555 61 11.0 0.012 - 2.1 0.008 - 0.012 25 25 Plums 573 0 0.016 ^ 100 -

Appendix B. Page 5 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 1 0.7 0.060 ^ 0.016 ^ 100 - Strawberries 737 517 70.1 0.020 - 12 0.012 - 0.038 25 20 Watermelon 123 0 0.008 - 0.010 25 - Winter Squash 79 0 0.012 ^ 25 - TOTA L 5,758 718

Carbaryl (insecticide )

Apples 743 53 7.1 0.0005 - 0.32 0.0003 - 0.002 10.0 5 Cantaloupe 558 20 3.6 0.003 - 0.11 0.002 - 0.008 10 - Cauliflowe r 741 1 0.1 0.0005 ^ 0.0003 ^ 10 - Eggplan t 736 22 3.0 0.017 - 0.14 0.010 ^ 10 1 Grapefrui t 719 13 1.8 0.003 - 0.039 0.002 - 0.006 10 7 Grapes 739 34 4.6 0.003 - 0.47 0.002 - 0.010 10 5 Green Beans 181 2 1.1 0.017 - 0.53 0.002 - 0.010 10 - Green Beans, Frozen 555 5 0.9 0.003 - 0.071 0.002 - 0.010 10 - Lettuce 743 1 0.1 0.004 ^ 0.0003 - 0.002 10 - Orange Juice 744 40 5.4 0.003 - 0.017 0.002 - 0.010 10 7 Oranges 741 14 1.9 0.003 - 0.12 0.002 - 0.010 10 7 Pears 555 61 11.0 0.003 - 0.33 0.002 - 0.010 10.0 5 Plums 573 49 8.6 0.017 - 0.11 0.010 ^ 10 - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 7 4.6 0.017 - 0.45 0.010 ^ 10 - Strawberries 733 21 2.9 0.003 - 0.44 0.002 ^ 10 - Watermelon 182 0 0.002 - 0.010 10 - Winter Squash 731 0 0.002 - 0.008 10 - TOTA L 10,127 343

Carbendazim - MBC (fungicide) (metabolite of benomyl)

Apples 528 110 20.8 0.0002 - 0.16 0.0001 - 0.0005 7.0 3 Cauliflowe r 741 20 2.7 0.0002 - 0.001 0.0001 - 0.0006 0.2 - Grapefrui t 351 0 0.045 ^ 10.0 - Lettuce (V-34) 527 34 6.5 0.0002 - 0.0008 0.0001 - 0.0005 NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.010 ^ NT - TOTA L 2,211 164

Carbofuran (insecticide) (parent of 3-Hydroxycarbofuran )

Apples 528 0 0.0003 ^ NT - Cantaloupe 558 3 0.5 0.054 - 0.29 0.002 - 0.008 0.2 - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.0003 ^ NT - Grapes 523 0 0.010 ^ 0.2 - Green Beans 127 0 0.015 ^ NT - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.015 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.0003 ^ NT - Orange Juice 528 0 0.010 ^ NT - Oranges 525 0 0.010 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.010 ^ NT - Strawberries 733 0 0.002 - 0.004 0.2 - Watermelon 182 0 0.002 - 0.010 0.4 - Winter Squash 731 0 0.002 - 0.008 0.6 - TOTA L 6,492 3

Carbophenothion (insecticide)

Apples 528 0 0.002 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.002 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.002 ^ NT - TOTA L 1,796 0

Carboxin (fungicide) Cantaloupe 44 0 0.016 ^ NT - Green Beans 54 0 0.008 ^ 0.2 - Green Beans, Frozen 160 0 0.008 ^ 0.2 - Winter Squash 43 0 0.016 ^ NT - TOTA L 301 0

Appendix B. Page 6 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm
Carfentrazone ethyl (herbicide)

Apples 132 0 0.001 ^ 0.10 - Cauliflowe r 216 0 0.001 ^ 0.10 - Eggplan t 736 0 0.030 ^ 0.10 - Grapes 523 0 0.008 ^ 0.10 - Lettuce 132 0 0.001 ^ 0.10 - Pears 394 0 0.008 ^ 0.10 - Watermelon 182 0 0.002 - 0.008 0.10 - TOTA L 2,315 0

Chlordane cis (insecticide) (isomer of Chlordane)

Apples 743 0 0.0007 - 0.002 0.1 AL 0.02 Cantaloupe 558 0 0.002 - 0.004 0.1 AL 0.02 Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.0007 ^ 0.1 AL 0.02 Eggplan t 736 0 0.003 ^ 0.1 AL 0.02 Grapefrui t 742 0 0.002 - 0.020 0.1 AL 0.02 Grapes 523 0 0.002 ^ 0.1 AL 0.02 Green Beans 181 0 0.0008 - 0.002 0.1 AL 0.02 Green Beans, Frozen 555 0 0.0008 - 0.002 0.1 AL 0.02 Lettuce 743 0 0.0007 - 0.002 0.1 AL 0.02 Orange Juice 744 0 0.002 - 0.012 0.1 AL 0.02 Oranges 741 0 0.002 - 0.012 0.1 AL 0.02 Pears 555 0 0.002 ^ 0.1 AL 0.02 Plums 573 0 0.003 ^ 0.1 AL 0.02 Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.003 ^ 0.1 AL 0.02 Watermelon 182 0 0.002 ^ 0.1 AL 0.02 Winter Squash 731 11 1.5 0.003 - 0.025 0.002 - 0.004 0.1 AL 0.02 TOTA L 9,201 11

Chlordane trans (insecticide) (isomer of Chlordane)

Apples 743 0 0.0007 - 0.002 0.1 AL 0.02 Cantaloupe 558 0 0.002 - 0.004 0.1 AL 0.02 Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.0007 ^ 0.1 AL 0.02 Eggplan t 736 0 0.003 ^ 0.1 AL 0.02 Grapefrui t 214 0 0.002 ^ 0.1 AL 0.02 Grapes 523 0 0.002 ^ 0.1 AL 0.02 Green Beans 181 0 0.0008 - 0.002 0.1 AL 0.02 Green Beans, Frozen 555 0 0.0008 - 0.002 0.1 AL 0.02 Lettuce 743 0 0.0007 - 0.002 0.1 AL 0.02 Orange Juice 744 0 0.002 - 0.012 0.1 AL 0.02 Oranges 741 0 0.002 - 0.012 0.1 AL 0.02 Pears 555 0 0.002 ^ 0.1 AL 0.02 Plums 573 0 0.003 ^ 0.1 AL 0.02 Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.003 ^ 0.1 AL 0.02 Watermelon 182 0 0.002 ^ 0.1 AL 0.02 Winter Squash 731 7 1.0 0.003 - 0.007 0.002 - 0.004 0.1 AL 0.02 TOTA L 8,673 7

Chlorethoxyfos (insecticide ) Cantaloupe 396 0 0.016 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.016 ^ NT - TOTA L 914 0

Chlorfenapyr (insecticide) Eggplan t 736 0 0.029 ^ 1.0 - TOTA L 736 0

Appendix B. Page 7 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm
Chlorfenvinphos total (insecticide)

Apples 528 0 0.004 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.004 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.004 ^ NT - TOTA L 1,796 0

Chlorothalonil (fungicide) Cantaloupe 206 0 0.005 - 0.008 5 2 Eggplant (V-10) 736 10 1.4 0.012 - 0.073 0.007 ^ NT - Grapes 523 0 0.002 ^ NT 0.5 Green Beans 181 65 35.9 0.003 - 3.9 0.002 - 0.005 5 5 Green Beans, Frozen 555 0 0.002 - 0.008 5 5 Lettuce (V-2) 2 2 100.0 0.013 - 0.20 0.005 - 0.008 NT - Orange Juice 528 0 0.008 ^ NT - Oranges 525 0 0.008 ^ NT - Pears (V-2) 394 2 0.5 0.004 ^ 0.002 ^ NT - Plums 573 0 0.008 ^ 0.2 - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.008 ^ 0.2 - Watermelon 182 0 0.002 - 0.010 5 - Winter Squash 256 14 5.5 0.008 - 1.0 0.005 - 0.008 5 5 TOTA L 4,814 93

Chlorpropham (herbicide, growth regulator)

Apples (V-1) 528 1 0.2 0.010 ^ 0.006 ^ NT - Cantaloupe 396 0 0.017 ^ NT - Cauliflower (V-2 ) 741 2 0.3 0.010 ^ 0.006 ^ NT - Grapes 523 0 0.011 ^ NT - Green Beans (V-1) 127 1 0.8 0.038 ^ 0.023 ^ NT - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.023 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.006 ^ NT - Orange Juice 528 0 0.010 ^ NT - Oranges 525 0 0.010 ^ NT - Pears (V-1) 394 1 0.3 0.018 ^ 0.011 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.011 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.017 ^ NT - TOTA L 5,266 5

Chlorpyrifos (insecticide )

Apples 743 8 1.1 0.002 - 0.013 0.001 - 0.004 1.5 1 Cantaloupe 558 21 3.8 0.007 - 0.016 0.004 ^ 0.1 - Cauliflowe r 741 7 0.9 0.002 - 0.010 0.001 ^ 1.0 0.05 Eggplan t 736 0 0.008 ^ 0.1 - Grapefrui t 742 18 2.4 0.001 - 0.004 0.0008 - 0.004 1.0 1 Grapes 739 92 12.4 0.006 - 0.19 0.004 ^ 0.5 0.5 Green Beans 181 0 0.004 - 0.005 0.05 0.01 Green Beans, Frozen 555 1 0.2 0.007 ^ 0.004 - 0.005 0.05 0.01 Lettuce 743 19 2.6 0.002 - 0.060 0.001 - 0.004 0.1 - Orange Juice 744 1 0.1 0.007 ^ 0.004 ^ 1.0 1 Oranges 741 28 3.8 0.007 - 0.017 0.004 ^ 1.0 1 Pears 555 17 3.1 0.006 - 0.024 0.004 ^ 0.05 1 Plums (X-3) 573 42 7.3 0.013 - 0.12 0.008 ^ 0.05 0.5 Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.008 ^ 0.05 0.5 Strawberries 737 29 3.9 0.001 - 0.035 0.0008 - 0.004 0.2 0.3 Watermelon 182 0 0.004 ^ 0.1 - Winter Squash 731 17 2.3 0.007 - 0.029 0.004 ^ 0.1 - TOTA L 10,154 300

Chlorpyrifos methyl (insecticide) Grapes 175 0 0.005 ^ NT 0.2 Green Beans 83 0 0.004 ^ NT 0.1 Pears 218 0 0.005 ^ NT - TOTA L 476 0

Appendix B. Page 8 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm
Clofentezine (insecticide)

Apples 347 1 0.3 0.19 ^ 0.007 - 0.022 0.5 0.5 Cauliflowe r 92 0 0.022 ^ NT - Lettuce 132 0 0.022 ^ NT - Pears 161 1 0.6 0.012 ^ 0.007 ^ 0.5 0.5 Watermelon 22 0 0.007 ^ NT - TOTA L 754 2

Clomazone (herbicide)

Apples 513 0 0.002 ^ NT - Cantaloupe 558 0 0.008 - 0.040 0.05 - Cauliflowe r 725 0 0.002 ^ NT - Grapes 523 0 0.015 ^ NT - Green Beans 181 0 0.005 - 0.008 0.05 - Green Beans, Frozen 555 0 0.005 - 0.008 0.05 - Lettuce 527 0 0.002 ^ NT - Orange Juice 528 0 0.008 ^ NT - Oranges 525 0 0.008 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.015 ^ NT - Watermelon 182 0 0.005 - 0.015 0.05 - Winter Squash 731 0 0.008 - 0.040 0.1 - TOTA L 5,942 0

Clothianidin (insecticide) (also a metabolite of thiamethoxam)

Watermelon 123 0 0.002 - 0.010 NT - TOTA L 123 0

Coumaphos (insecticide)

Apples 528 0 0.006 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.006 ^ NT - TOTA L 1,055 0

Coumaphos oxygen analog (metabolite of Coumaphos)

Apples 528 0 0.008 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.008 ^ NT - TOTA L 1,055 0

Cycloate (herbicide )

Apples 132 0 0.002 ^ NT - Cantaloupe 396 0 0.016 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 216 0 0.002 ^ NT - Lettuce 132 0 0.002 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.016 ^ NT - TOTA L 1,394 0

Cyfluthrin (insecticide )

Apples 743 0 0.030 - 0.14 0.05 0.5 Cantaloupe 558 0 0.030 ^ 0.05 - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.14 - 0.27 2.5 - Eggplan t 736 0 0.067 ^ 0.05 - Grapefrui t 742 0 0.021 - 0.030 0.2 - Grapes 739 0 0.023 - 0.030 0.05 - Green Beans 127 0 0.045 ^ 0.05 - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.045 ^ 0.05 - Lettuce 743 14 1.9 0.050 - 0.68 0.030 - 0.27 3.0 - Orange Juice 744 0 0.030 - 0.060 0.2 - Oranges 741 0 0.030 - 0.060 0.2 - Pears 555 0 0.023 - 0.030 0.05 - Plums 573 0 0.068 ^ 0.05 - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.068 ^ 0.05 - Strawberries 737 0 0.024 - 0.030 0.05 -

Appendix B. Page 9 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm
Watermelon 182 0 0.023 - 0.030 0.05 - Winter Squash 731 0 0.030 ^ 0.05 - TOTA L 9,940 14

Cyhalothrin, Total (Cyhalothrin-L + R157836 epimer) (insecticide) * * Apples 528 2 0.4 0.010 - 0.023 0.006 - 0.020 0.30 0.2 Cantaloupe 396 0 0.016 ^ 0.01 - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.006 - 0.020 0.4 - Grapefrui t 528 0 0.008 ^ 0.01 - Grapes 523 0 0.015 ^ 0.01 - Lettuce 527 65 12.3 0.010 - 0.37 0.006 ^ 2.0 - Orange Juice 528 0 0.060 ^ 0.01 - Oranges 525 0 0.060 ^ 0.01 - Pears 394 0 0.015 ^ 0.30 0.2 Strawberries (X-2 ) 521 3 0.6 0.014 - 0.17 0.008 ^ 0.01 - Watermelon 123 0 0.015 ^ 0.01 - Winter Squash 518 0 0.016 ^ 0.01 - TOTA L 5,852 70

Cyhalothrin, Lambda (includes gamma isomer) (insecticide)

Apples 213 0 0.006 ^ 0.30 0.2 Cantaloupe 162 0 0.006 ^ 0.01 - Eggplan t 736 0 0.038 ^ 0.20 - Grapefrui t 214 0 0.006 ^ 0.01 - Grapes 216 1 0.5 0.010 ^ 0.006 ^ 0.01 - Green Beans 181 0 0.006 - 0.030 0.20 - Green Beans, Frozen 555 0 0.006 - 0.030 0.20 - Lettuce 216 22 10.2 0.010 - 0.44 0.006 ^ 2.0 - Orange Juice 216 0 0.006 ^ 0.01 - Oranges 216 0 0.006 ^ 0.01 - Pears 161 3 1.9 0.010 ^ 0.006 ^ 0.30 0.2 Plums 573 0 0.039 ^ 0.50 - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.039 ^ 0.50 - Strawberries (X-2 ) 216 2 0.9 0.036 - 0.14 0.006 ^ 0.01 - Watermelon 59 0 0.006 ^ 0.01 - Winter Squash 213 0 0.006 ^ 0.01 - TOTA L 4,300 28

Cyhalothrin, epimer R157836 (insecticide)

Apples 213 0 0.006 ^ 0.30 0.2 Cantaloupe 162 0 0.006 ^ 0.01 - Eggplan t 124 0 0.077 ^ 0.20 - Grapefrui t 214 0 0.006 ^ 0.01 - Grapes 215 0 0.006 ^ 0.01 - Green Beans 54 0 0.006 ^ 0.20 - Green Beans, Frozen 160 0 0.006 ^ 0.20 - Lettuce 216 6 2.8 0.010 - 0.032 0.006 ^ 2.0 - Orange Juice 216 0 0.006 ^ 0.01 - Oranges 216 0 0.006 ^ 0.01 - Pears 161 0 0.006 ^ 0.30 0.2 Plums 46 0 0.047 ^ 0.50 - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 109 0 0.047 ^ 0.50 - Strawberries 216 0 0.006 ^ 0.01 - Watermelon 59 0 0.006 ^ 0.01 - Winter Squash 213 0 0.006 ^ 0.01 - TOTA L 2,594 6

Cypermethrin (insecticide )

Apples 743 0 0.030 - 0.17 NT 2 Cantaloupe 558 0 0.030 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.17 - 0.34 2.0 1 Eggplan t 736 0 0.057 ^ 0.2 0.2 Grapes 523 0 0.023 ^ NT 0.5

Appendix B. Page 10 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm
Green Beans 127 0 0.015 ^ 0.5 0.5 Green Beans, Frozen 397 4 1.0 0.025 - 0.050 0.015 - 0.030 0.5 0.5 Lettuce 743 54 7.3 0.043 - 1.0 0.030 - 0.34 10.0 2 Orange Juice 528 0 0.035 ^ NT 2 Oranges 525 0 0.035 ^ NT 2 Pears 555 0 0.023 - 0.030 NT 2 Plums 573 0 0.067 ^ NT 1 Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.067 ^ NT 1 Watermelon 182 0 0.020 - 0.030 NT - Winter Squash 731 0 0.030 ^ NT - TOTA L 7,815 58

Cyprodinil (fungicide)

Apples 215 2 0.9 0.013 ^ 0.008 ^ 0.1 0.05 Grapes 739 198 26.8 0.008 - 1.4 0.008 ^ 2.0 3 Green Beans, Frozen 1 1 100.0 0.14 ^ 0.082 ^ 0.6 0.5 Pears 555 0 0.008 ^ 0.1 1 Plums 573 7 1.2 0.013 - 0.079 0.008 ^ 2.0 2 Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 6 3.9 0.013 ^ 0.008 ^ 2.0 2 Strawberries 737 132 17.9 0.013 - 1.1 0.008 - 0.092 5.0 2 Watermelon 64 0 0.008 ^ NT - TOTA L 3,037 346

Cyromazine (insect growth regulator)

Apples 528 0 0.002 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.002 ^ 10.0 - Lettuce 527 17 3.2 0.004 - 0.59 0.002 ^ 7.0 5 TOTA L 1,796 17

DCPA (herbicide )

Apples 514 0 0.0007 ^ NT - Cantaloupe 558 6 1.1 0.005 - 0.012 0.003 - 0.007 1 - Cauliflowe r 741 57 7.7 0.001 - 0.006 0.0007 ^ 5 - Eggplan t 736 0 0.006 ^ 1 - Grapes 523 0 0.002 ^ NT - Green Beans 181 0 0.002 - 0.006 2 - Green Beans, Frozen 555 0 0.002 - 0.006 2 - Lettuce 743 228 30.7 0.001 - 0.17 0.0007 - 0.006 2 - Orange Juice 528 0 0.006 ^ NT - Oranges 525 0 0.006 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.002 ^ NT - Strawberries 737 0 0.003 - 0.006 2 - Watermelon 182 0 0.002 - 0.008 1 - Winter Squash 731 1 0.1 0.043 ^ 0.003 - 0.007 1 - TOTA L 7,648 292

DDD o,p' (metabolite of DDT)

Apples 528 0 0.001 ^ 0.1 AL - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.001 ^ 0.5 AL - Lettuce 527 0 0.001 ^ 0.5 AL - TOTA L 1,796 0

DDD p,p' (metabolite of DDT)

Apples 743 0 0.001 - 0.008 0.1 AL - Cantaloupe 558 0 0.004 - 0.020 0.1 AL - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.001 ^ 0.5 AL - Eggplan t 736 0 0.005 ^ 0.1 AL - Grapefrui t 742 0 0.004 - 0.016 0.1 AL - Grapes 739 0 0.004 - 0.008 0.05 AL - Green Beans 181 0 0.008 - 0.010 0.2 AL - Green Beans, Frozen 555 0 0.004 - 0.010 0.2 AL -

Appendix B. Page 11 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm
Lettuce 743 0 0.001 - 0.008 0.5 AL - Orange Juice 744 0 0.004 - 0.008 0.1 AL - Oranges 741 0 0.004 - 0.008 0.1 AL - Pears 555 0 0.004 - 0.008 0.1 AL - Plums 573 0 0.007 ^ 0.2 AL - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.007 ^ 0.2 AL - Watermelon 182 0 0.004 - 0.008 0.1 AL - Winter Squash 731 0 0.004 - 0.020 0.1 AL - TOTA L 9,417 0

DDE p,p' (metabolite of DDT)

Apples 743 0 0.002 - 0.007 0.1 AL - Cantaloupe 558 0 0.004 - 0.007 0.1 AL - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.002 ^ 0.5 AL - Eggplan t 736 0 0.005 ^ 0.1 AL - Grapefrui t 742 0 0.004 - 0.010 0.1 AL - Grapes 739 0 0.004 - 0.007 0.05 AL - Green Beans 181 2 1.1 0.003 ^ 0.002 - 0.007 0.2 AL - Green Beans, Frozen 555 0 0.002 - 0.007 0.2 AL - Lettuce 743 109 14.7 0.003 - 0.015 0.002 - 0.007 0.5 AL - Orange Juice 744 0 0.004 - 0.007 0.1 AL - Oranges 741 0 0.004 - 0.007 0.1 AL - Pears 555 0 0.004 - 0.007 0.1 AL - Plums 573 0 0.006 ^ 0.2 AL - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.006 ^ 0.2 AL - Watermelon 182 0 0.004 - 0.005 0.1 AL - Winter Squash 731 1 0.1 0.007 ^ 0.004 - 0.007 0.1 AL - TOTA L 9,417 112

DDT o,p' (insecticide)

Apples 513 0 0.001 ^ 0.1 AL - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.001 ^ 0.5 AL - Lettuce 527 3 0.6 0.002 ^ 0.001 ^ 0.5 AL - TOTA L 1,781 3

DDT p,p' (insecticide)

Apples 743 0 0.002 - 0.008 0.1 AL - Cantaloupe 162 0 0.0004 - 0.008 0.1 AL - Cauliflowe r 741 1 0.1 0.003 ^ 0.002 ^ 0.5 AL - Eggplan t 736 0 0.007 ^ 0.1 AL - Grapefrui t 742 0 0.004 - 0.029 0.1 AL - Grapes 739 0 0.004 - 0.008 0.05 AL - Green Beans 181 0 0.008 - 0.010 0.2 AL - Green Beans, Frozen 555 0 0.004 - 0.010 0.2 AL - Lettuce 743 3 0.4 0.003 ^ 0.002 - 0.008 0.5 AL - Orange Juice 744 0 0.004 - 0.008 0.1 AL - Oranges 741 0 0.004 - 0.008 0.1 AL - Pears 555 0 0.004 - 0.008 0.1 AL - Plums 573 0 0.010 ^ 0.2 AL - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.010 ^ 0.2 AL - Watermelon 123 0 0.004 - 0.005 0.1 AL - Winter Squash 213 1 0.5 0.007 ^ 0.004 - 0.008 0.1 AL - TOTA L 8,444 5

Deltamethrin (insecticide) (includes parent Tralomethrin)

Apples 698 0 0.015 - 0.53 0.2 0.2 Cantaloupe 558 0 0.015 - 0.24 0.2 0.2 Cauliflowe r 216 0 0.080 ^ 0.05 0.1 Eggplan t 736 0 0.052 ^ 0.3 -

Appendix B. Page 12 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm Grapefrui t 742 0 0.015 - 0.055 0.05 0.02 Grapes 739 0 0.015 - 0.023 0.05 0.2 Lettuce 216 1 0.5 0.025 ^ 0.015 ^ 0.05 0.5 Orange Juice 744 0 0.015 - 0.018 0.05 0.02 Oranges 741 0 0.015 - 0.018 0.05 0.02 Pears 555 0 0.015 - 0.023 0.05 - Plums 573 0 0.052 ^ 0.05 0.05 Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.052 ^ 0.05 0.05 Strawberries 737 0 0.015 - 0.11 0.05 0.2 Watermelon 182 0 0.015 - 0.023 0.2 0.2 Winter Squash 731 0 0.015 - 0.24 0.2 0.2 TOTA L 8,321 1

Diazinon (insecticide)

Apples 743 13 1.7 0.003 - 0.13 0.002 ^ 0.5 0.3 Cantaloupe 558 0 0.002 - 0.007 0.75 0.2 Grapefrui t 742 0 0.001 - 0.002 0.7 - Grapes 739 4 0.5 0.003 - 0.016 0.002 - 0.005 0.75 - Green Beans 181 0 0.002 - 0.005 0.5 0.2 Green Beans, Frozen 555 0 0.002 - 0.005 0.5 0.2 Lettuce 743 98 13.2 0.003 - 0.027 0.002 ^ 0.7 0.5 Orange Juice 744 0 0.002 ^ 0.7 - Oranges 741 0 0.002 ^ 0.7 - Pears 555 11 2.0 0.003 - 0.008 0.002 - 0.005 0.5 0.3 Plums 573 2 0.3 0.012 ^ 0.007 ^ 0.5 1 Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.007 ^ 0.5 1 Strawberries 737 3 0.4 0.002 - 0.005 0.001 - 0.002 0.5 0.1 Watermelon 182 0 0.002 - 0.005 0.75 - Winter Squash 731 0 0.002 - 0.007 0.75 0.05 TOTA L 8,677 131

Diazinon oxygen analog (metabolite of Diazinon)

Apples 743 0 0.003 ^ NT - Cantaloupe 558 0 0.003 - 0.016 NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.003 ^ NT - Grapefrui t 214 0 0.003 ^ NT - Grapes 739 0 0.001 - 0.003 NT - Green Beans 180 0 0.003 - 0.005 NT - Green Beans, Frozen 555 0 0.003 - 0.005 NT - Lettuce 743 0 0.003 ^ NT - Orange Juice 744 0 0.003 ^ NT - Oranges 741 0 0.003 ^ NT - Pears 555 0 0.001 - 0.003 NT - Plums 573 0 0.011 ^ NT - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.011 ^ NT - Strawberries 216 0 0.003 ^ NT - Watermelon 182 0 0.001 - 0.012 NT - Winter Squash 731 0 0.003 - 0.016 NT - TOTA L 8,368 0

Dichlobenil (herbicide)

Apples 728 0 0.005 - 0.019 0.5 - Cauliflowe r 709 0 0.019 - 0.064 NT - Grapes 697 0 0.005 - 0.013 0.15 - Lettuce 512 0 0.019 ^ NT - Orange Juice 528 0 0.005 ^ NT - Oranges 525 0 0.005 ^ NT - Pears 555 0 0.005 - 0.013 0.5 - Plums 573 0 0.011 ^ 0.15 - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.011 ^ 0.15 - Watermelon 86 0 0.005 - 0.013 NT - TOTA L 5,066 0

Appendix B. Page 13 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm
Dichlorvos - DDVP (insecticide) (also a metabolite of Naled)

Apples 743 0 0.002 - 0.003 0.5 - Cantaloupe 558 1 0.2 0.005 ^ 0.002 - 0.003 0.5 - Eggplan t 736 0 0.004 ^ 0.5 - Grapefrui t 742 0 0.0006 - 0.002 3 - Grapes 739 0 0.002 ^ 0.5 - Green Beans 181 0 0.002 - 0.006 0.5 - Green Beans, Frozen 555 0 0.002 - 0.006 0.5 - Lettuce 743 0 0.002 - 0.003 1 - Orange Juice 744 0 0.002 ^ 3 - Oranges 741 1 0.1 0.003 ^ 0.002 ^ 3 - Pears 394 0 0.002 ^ 0.5 - Plums 573 0 0.004 ^ 0.5 - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.004 ^ 0.5 - Strawberries 737 49 6.6 0.001 - 0.43 0.0007 - 0.002 1 - Watermelon 182 0 0.002 - 0.003 0.5 - Winter Squash 731 0 0.002 - 0.003 0.5 - TOTA L 9,252 51

Dicloran (fungicide)

Apples 528 0 0.002 ^ NT - Cantaloupe 396 0 0.010 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.002 ^ NT - Grapes 739 31 4.2 0.006 - 0.18 0.004 - 0.008 10 7 Green Beans 181 1 0.6 0.014 ^ 0.002 - 0.008 20 - Green Beans, Frozen 555 0 0.002 - 0.008 20 - Lettuce 743 9 1.2 0.003 - 0.013 0.002 - 0.008 10 - Orange Juice 528 0 0.008 ^ NT - Oranges 525 0 0.008 ^ NT - Pears (V-1) 395 1 0.3 0.013 ^ 0.004 - 0.008 NT - Plums 573 8 1.4 0.017 - 1.1 0.010 ^ 15 - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.010 ^ 15 - Watermelon 64 0 0.004 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.010 ^ NT - TOTA L 6,639 50

Dicofol o,p' (insecticide)

Apples 528 0 0.003 - 0.010 5 - Cauliflowe r 725 0 0.003 - 0.040 NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.003 ^ NT - Strawberries 521 0 0.006 - 0.012 5 - TOTA L 2,301 0

Dicofol p,p' (isomer of Dicofol o,p')

Apples 743 0 0.003 - 0.040 5 - Cantaloupe 558 11 2.0 0.017 - 0.045 0.010 - 0.018 5 0.2 Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.003 - 0.019 NT - Eggplan t 736 5 0.7 0.017 - 0.11 0.010 ^ 5 - Grapefrui t 742 0 0.010 - 0.022 10 5 Grapes 739 2 0.3 0.49 - 0.51 0.010 - 0.015 5 5 Green Beans 181 0 0.008 - 0.010 5 2 Green Beans, Frozen 555 6 1.1 0.012 - 0.044 0.008 - 0.010 5 2 Lettuce (V-1) 527 1 0.2 0.005 ^ 0.003 ^ NT - Orange Juice 744 0 0.010 ^ 10 5 Oranges 741 4 0.5 0.017 ^ 0.010 ^ 10 5 Pears 555 1 0.2 0.14 ^ 0.010 - 0.015 5 - Plums 573 5 0.9 0.040 - 0.94 0.024 ^ 5 1 Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 3 2.0 0.040 - 0.085 0.024 ^ 5 1 Strawberries 737 3 0.4 0.017 - 0.70 0.010 - 0.020 5 - Watermelon 182 0 0.010 - 0.015 5 - Winter Squash 731 0 0.010 - 0.018 5 1 TOTA L 9,938 41

Appendix B. Page 14 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm
Dieldrin (insecticide) (also a metabolite of Aldrin)

Apples 743 0 0.003 - 0.006 0.03 AL 0.05 Cantaloupe 558 7 1.3 0.005 - 0.010 0.003 - 0.018 0.1 AL 0.1 Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.005 ^ 0.03 AL - Eggplan t 736 0 0.004 ^ 0.05 AL 0.1 Grapefrui t 742 0 0.003 - 0.006 0.02 AL 0.05 Grapes 523 0 0.005 ^ 0.05 AL - Green Beans 181 0 0.0008 - 0.006 0.05 AL 0.05 Green Beans, Frozen 555 0 0.0008 - 0.006 0.05 AL 0.05 Lettuce 743 0 0.003 - 0.006 0.03 AL 0.05 Orange Juice 744 0 0.003 - 0.006 0.02 AL 0.05 Oranges 741 0 0.003 - 0.006 0.02 AL 0.05 Pears 555 0 0.003 - 0.006 0.03 AL 0.05 Plums 573 0 0.005 ^ 0.3 AL - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.005 ^ 0.3 AL - Watermelon 182 1 0.5 0.005 ^ 0.003 - 0.005 0.1 AL 0.1 Winter Squash 731 48 6.6 0.005 - 0.17 0.003 - 0.018 0.1 AL 0.1 TOTA L 9,201 56

Difenoconazole (fungicide)

Cantaloupe 396 0 0.072 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.005 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.072 ^ NT - TOTA L 978 0

Diflubenzuron (insecticide)

Apples (V-23) 469 23 4.9 0.011 - 0.14 0.007 ^ NT 5 Cauliflowe r 617 0 0.007 - 0.022 NT - Grapefrui t 214 0 0.007 ^ 0.5 0.5 Lettuce 497 0 0.007 ^ NT - Orange Juice 744 0 0.007 - 0.010 0.5 0.5 Oranges 741 0 0.0007 - 0.010 0.5 0.5 Pears 161 1 0.6 0.036 ^ 0.007 ^ 0.50 5 TOTA L 3,443 24

Dimethenamid (herbicide)

Cantaloupe 396 0 0.016 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.016 ^ NT - TOTA L 914 0

Dimethoate (insecticide) (parent of Omethoate)

Apples 743 5 0.7 0.004 - 0.057 0.002 ^ 2 - Cantaloupe 558 25 4.5 0.003 - 0.29 0.002 - 0.007 1 - Cauliflowe r 741 42 5.7 0.004 - 0.026 0.002 ^ 2 2 Grapefrui t 742 0 0.002 - 0.003 2 2 Grapes 739 5 0.7 0.008 - 0.032 0.002 - 0.005 1 - Green Beans 181 18 9.9 0.003 - 2.0 0.002 - 0.005 2 - Green Beans, Frozen 555 7 1.3 0.003 - 0.040 0.002 - 0.005 2 - Lettuce 743 76 10.2 0.003 - 0.11 0.002 ^ 2 2 Orange Juice 726 0 0.002 ^ 2 2 Oranges 741 2 0.3 0.003 ^ 0.002 ^ 2 2 Pears 555 0 0.002 - 0.005 2 1 Strawberries (V-1) 1 1 100.0 0.003 ^ 0.002 ^ NT - Watermelon 182 1 0.5 0.003 ^ 0.002 - 0.005 1 - Winter Squash 518 0 0.007 ^ NT - TOTA L 7,725 182

Dimethomorph (fungicide)

Apples 528 0 0.002 ^ NT - Cantaloupe 36 0 0.050 - 0.10 0.5 -

Appendix B. Page 15 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm Cauliflower (V-2 ) 741 2 0.3 0.003 ^ 0.002 ^ NT - Eggplan t 736 0 0.084 ^ 1.5 - Grapes 216 0 0.050 ^ 3.5 - Lettuce 743 212 28.5 0.003 - 4.2 0.002 - 0.10 10 - Orange Juice 528 0 0.030 ^ NT - Oranges 525 0 0.030 ^ NT - Watermelon 118 0 0.040 - 0.050 0.5 - TOTA L 4,171 214

Dinotefuran (insecticide)

Watermelon 59 0 0.0005 - 0.005 0.5 - TOTA L 59 0

Diphenamid (herbicide)

Apples 528 0 0.010 ^ NT - Cantaloupe (V-1) 396 1 0.3 0.030 ^ 0.018 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.010 ^ NT - Green Beans 127 0 0.015 ^ NT - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.015 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.010 ^ NT - Orange Juice 528 0 0.006 ^ NT - Oranges 525 0 0.006 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.018 ^ NT - TOTA L 4,285 1

Diphenylamine - DPA (fungicide )

Apples 743 616 82.9 0.005 - 2.9 0.003 - 0.010 10.0 10 Cantaloupe (V-4) 540 4 0.7 0.014 ^ 0.008 - 0.010 NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.003 ^ NT - Grapes 523 0 0.015 ^ NT - Green Beans 127 0 0.015 ^ NT - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.015 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.003 ^ NT - Orange Juice 528 0 0.010 ^ NT - Oranges 525 0 0.010 ^ NT - Pears 555 35 6.3 0.017 - 0.67 0.010 - 0.015 10 5 Watermelon 86 0 0.010 - 0.015 NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.008 ^ NT - TOTA L 5,808 655

Disulfoton (insecticide)

Apples 528 0 0.002 ^ NT - Cantaloupe 396 0 0.007 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.002 ^ 0.75 0.5 Grapes 523 0 0.004 ^ NT - Green Beans 181 0 0.003 - 0.008 0.75 0.2 Green Beans, Frozen 555 0 0.003 - 0.008 0.75 0.2 Lettuce 743 0 0.002 - 0.003 0.75 0.5 Pears 394 0 0.004 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.004 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.007 ^ NT 0.5 TOTA L 4,643 0

Disulfoton sulfone (metabolite of Disulfoton)

Apples 528 0 0.006 ^ NT - Cantaloupe 396 0 0.009 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.006 ^ 0.75 0.5 Grapes 523 0 0.004 ^ NT - Green Beans 181 0 0.004 - 0.005 0.75 0.2 Green Beans, Frozen 555 0 0.004 - 0.005 0.75 0.2 Lettuce 743 0 0.004 - 0.006 0.75 0.5 Pears 394 0 0.004 ^ NT -

Appendix B. Page 16 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm
Watermelon 64 0 0.004 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.009 ^ NT 0.5 TOTA L 4,643 0

Diuron (herbicide)

Apples 743 0 0.008 - 0.011 1 - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.008 ^ NT - Grapefrui t 214 0 0.011 ^ 1 - Grapes 216 0 0.011 ^ 1 - Lettuce 527 0 0.008 ^ NT - Orange Juice 744 0 0.010 - 0.011 1 - Oranges 741 1 0.1 0.017 ^ 0.010 - 0.012 1 - Pears 161 0 0.011 ^ 1 - TOTA L 4,087 1

Endosulfan I (insecticide)

Apples 733 17 2.3 0.008 - 0.31 0.003 - 0.006 2.0 1 Cantaloupe 558 4 0.7 0.005 - 0.008 0.003 - 0.007 2.0 0.5 Cauliflowe r 725 0 0.006 ^ 2.0 0.5 Eggplan t 736 20 2.7 0.007 - 0.049 0.004 ^ 2.0 - Grapes 739 0 0.002 - 0.005 2.0 1 Green Beans 181 79 43.6 0.003 - 0.13 0.002 - 0.005 2.0 0.5 Green Beans, Frozen 555 0 0.002 - 0.005 2.0 0.5 Lettuce 743 66 8.9 0.005 - 0.35 0.003 - 0.006 2.0 1 Orange Juice 546 0 0.005 ^ NT 0.5 Oranges 525 0 0.005 ^ NT 0.5 Pears 555 2 0.4 0.016 - 0.017 0.002 - 0.005 2.0 1 Plums 573 0 0.004 ^ 2.0 1 Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.004 ^ 2.0 1 Strawberries 737 4 0.5 0.053 - 0.22 0.003 - 0.006 2.0 - Watermelon 104 0 0.002 - 0.003 2.0 - Winter Squash 731 10 1.4 0.005 - 0.027 0.003 - 0.007 2.0 0.5 TOTA L 8,894 202

Endosulfan II (isomer of Endosulfan)

Apples 743 22 3.0 0.010 - 0.14 0.004 - 0.006 2.0 1 Cantaloupe 558 0 0.004 - 0.007 2.0 0.5 Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.006 - 0.020 2.0 0.5 Eggplan t 736 63 8.6 0.007 - 0.071 0.004 ^ 2.0 - Grapes 695 0 0.004 - 0.013 2.0 1 Green Beans 181 58 32.0 0.003 - 0.15 0.002 - 0.006 2.0 0.5 Green Beans, Frozen 555 0 0.002 - 0.006 2.0 0.5 Lettuce 743 46 6.2 0.007 - 0.39 0.004 - 0.006 2.0 1 Orange Juice 546 0 0.006 ^ NT 0.5 Oranges 525 0 0.006 ^ NT 0.5 Pears 533 3 0.6 0.010 - 0.046 0.004 - 0.013 2.0 1 Plums 573 0 0.004 ^ 2.0 1 Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.004 ^ 2.0 1 Strawberries 737 11 1.5 0.007 - 0.27 0.004 - 0.008 2.0 - Watermelon 104 0 0.004 ^ 2.0 - Winter Squash 731 5 0.7 0.007 - 0.012 0.004 - 0.007 2.0 0.5 TOTA L 8,854 208

Endosulfan sulfate (metabolite of Endosulfan)

Apples 743 11 1.5 0.007 - 0.12 0.004 - 0.020 2.0 1 Cantaloupe 558 159 28.5 0.007 - 0.094 0.004 - 0.007 2.0 0.5 Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.020 ^ 2.0 0.5 Eggplan t 736 87 11.8 0.010 - 0.083 0.006 ^ 2.0 - Grapes 739 0 0.004 - 0.007 2.0 1 Green Beans 181 106 58.6 0.003 - 0.47 0.002 - 0.007 2.0 0.5 Green Beans, Frozen 555 4 0.7 0.003 ^ 0.002 - 0.007 2.0 0.5 Lettuce 743 58 7.8 0.007 - 0.42 0.004 - 0.020 2.0 1 Orange Juice 546 0 0.006 - 0.007 NT 0.5

Appendix B. Page 17 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm Oranges 525 0 0.006 ^ NT 0.5 Pears 555 9 1.6 0.006 - 0.052 0.004 - 0.007 2.0 1 Plums 573 0 0.006 ^ 2.0 1 Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.006 ^ 2.0 1 Strawberries 737 14 1.9 0.007 - 0.050 0.004 - 0.008 2.0 - Watermelon 104 1 1.0 0.006 ^ 0.004 ^ 2.0 - Winter Squash 731 128 17.5 0.007 - 0.060 0.004 - 0.007 2.0 0.5 TOTA L 8,920 577

Endrin (insecticide)

Apples 528 0 0.007 ^ NT - Cantaloupe 558 0 0.004 - 0.040 0.05 AL 0.05 Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.007 - 0.022 0.05 AL - Eggplan t 736 0 0.004 ^ 0.05 AL - Grapes 523 0 0.002 ^ NT - Green Beans 181 0 0.001 - 0.008 0.05 AL - Green Beans, Frozen 555 0 0.001 - 0.008 0.05 AL - Lettuce 743 0 0.004 - 0.008 0.05 AL - Pears 394 0 0.002 ^ NT - Watermelon 182 0 0.002 - 0.008 0.05 AL 0.05 Winter Squash 731 0 0.004 - 0.040 0.05 AL 0.05 TOTA L 5,872 0

EPTC (herbicide)

Apples 528 0 0.064 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.064 ^ 0.1 - Eggplan t 736 0 0.016 ^ 0.1 - Lettuce 513 0 0.064 ^ 0.1 - Orange Juice 528 0 0.020 ^ 0.1 - Oranges 525 0 0.020 ^ 0.1 - TOTA L 3,571 0

Esfenvalerate (insecticide) (isomer of Fenvalerate) Eggplan t 736 0 0.054 ^ 0.05 - Grapefrui t 528 0 0.013 ^ 0.05 - Plums (X-1) 573 1 0.2 0.10 ^ 0.060 ^ 0.05 - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.060 ^ 0.05 - TOTA L 1,990 1

Esfenvalerate+Fenvalerate Total (insecticide )

Apples 743 3 0.4 0.025 ^ 0.015 - 0.12 2.0 2 Cantaloupe 558 0 0.015 - 0.042 1.0 0.2 Cauliflowe r 727 0 0.029 - 0.12 0.5 2 Grapefrui t 214 0 0.015 ^ 0.05 2 Grapes 739 1 0.1 0.025 ^ 0.015 - 0.038 0.05 1 Green Beans 181 7 3.9 0.025 - 0.064 0.015 - 0.050 2.0 1 Green Beans, Frozen 555 1 0.2 0.083 ^ 0.015 - 0.050 2.0 1 Lettuce 729 0 0.015 - 0.29 5.0 2 Orange Juice 744 0 0.015 - 0.051 0.05 2 Oranges 741 0 0.015 - 0.051 0.05 2 Pears 555 0 0.015 - 0.038 2.0 2 Strawberries 737 0 0.015 - 0.020 0.05 1 Watermelon 123 0 0.015 - 0.038 1.0 0.5 Winter Squash 731 0 0.015 - 0.042 1.0 0.5 TOTA L 8,077 12

Ethalfluralin (herbicide)

Apples 499 0 0.017 ^ NT - Cantaloupe 558 0 0.007 - 0.040 0.05 - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.017 - 0.056 NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.017 - 0.056 NT - Orange Juice 528 0 0.015 ^ NT - Oranges 525 0 0.015 ^ NT -
Appendix B. Page 18 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm
Watermelon 118 0 0.007 - 0.015 0.05 - Winter Squash 731 0 0.007 - 0.040 0.05 - TOTA L 4,227 0

Ethiofencarb (insecticide)

Apples 528 0 0.015 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.015 ^ NT - Grapes 523 0 0.010 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.015 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.010 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.010 ^ NT - TOTA L 2,777 0

Ethion (insecticide)

Apples 528 0 0.001 ^ NT - Cantaloupe 396 0 0.004 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.001 ^ NT - Grapefrui t 742 10 1.3 0.001 - 0.007 0.0007 - 0.002 5.0 - Grapes 523 0 0.005 ^ NT - Green Beans 127 0 0.010 ^ NT - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.010 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.001 ^ NT - Orange Juice 744 0 0.002 - 0.005 5.0 - Oranges 741 0 0.002 - 0.005 5.0 - Pears (V-1) 394 1 0.3 0.13 ^ 0.005 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.005 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.004 ^ NT - TOTA L 6,440 11

Ethion di oxon (metabolite of Ethion)

Grapefrui t 742 0 0.002 - 0.003 5.0 - Orange Juice 744 0 0.003 - 0.005 5.0 - Oranges 741 0 0.003 - 0.005 5.0 - TOTA L 2,227 0

Ethion mono oxon (metabolite of Ethion)

Apples 528 0 0.002 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.002 ^ NT - Grapefrui t 742 0 0.0007 - 0.002 5.0 - Lettuce 527 0 0.002 ^ NT - Orange Juice 744 0 0.002 ^ 5.0 - Oranges 741 0 0.002 ^ 5.0 - TOTA L 4,023 0

Ethoprop (insecticide)

Apples 528 0 0.0009 ^ NT - Cantaloupe 396 0 0.016 ^ NT 0.02 Green Beans 54 0 0.002 ^ 0.02 - Green Beans, Frozen 160 0 0.002 ^ 0.02 - Lettuce 527 0 0.0009 ^ NT 0.02 Orange Juice 528 0 0.002 ^ NT - Oranges 525 0 0.002 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.016 ^ NT - TOTA L 3,236 0

Etoxazole (acaricide)

Apples 132 7 5.3 0.0002 - 0.035 0.0001 ^ 0.20 - Cauliflowe r 216 0 0.0001 ^ NT - Lettuce 117 0 0.0001 ^ NT - TOTA L 465 7

Appendix B. Page 19 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm
Etridiazole (fungicide)

Grapes 523 0 0.002 ^ NT - Green Beans 127 0 0.003 ^ NT - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.003 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.002 ^ NT - Strawberries 521 0 0.006 ^ 0.20 - Watermelon 64 0 0.002 ^ NT - TOTA L 2,024 0

Famoxadone (fungicide)

Cantaloupe 396 0 0.13 ^ 0.30 - Eggplan t 736 0 0.051 ^ 4.0 - Watermelon 118 0 0.002 - 0.030 0.3 - Winter Squash 518 0 0.13 ^ 0.30 - TOTA L 1,768 0

Fenamidone (fungicide)

Watermelon 118 0 0.003 - 0.004 0.15 - TOTA L 118 0

Fenamiphos (insecticide)

Apples 743 0 0.002 - 0.004 0.25 0.05 Cantaloupe 396 0 0.006 ^ NT 0.05 Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.002 ^ NT - Eggplan t 736 0 0.007 ^ 0.1 - Grapefrui t 742 0 0.001 - 0.004 0.60 - Grapes 739 0 0.001 - 0.004 0.10 - Green Beans 127 0 0.008 ^ NT - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.008 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.002 ^ NT - Orange Juice 744 0 0.004 ^ 0.60 - Oranges 741 0 0.004 ^ 0.60 - Pears 394 0 0.001 ^ NT - Strawberries 216 0 0.004 ^ 0.6 - Watermelon 64 0 0.005 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.006 ^ NT - TOTA L 7,823 0

Fenamiphos sulfone (metabolite of Fenamiphos)

Apples 743 0 0.002 - 0.008 0.25 0.05 Cantaloupe 396 0 0.024 ^ NT 0.05 Eggplan t 736 0 0.016 ^ 0.1 - Grapefrui t 214 0 0.008 ^ 0.60 - Grapes 739 0 0.001 - 0.008 0.10 - Green Beans 127 0 0.020 ^ NT - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.020 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.002 - 0.004 NT - Orange Juice 744 0 0.008 ^ 0.60 - Oranges 741 0 0.008 ^ 0.60 - Pears 394 0 0.001 ^ NT - Strawberries 216 0 0.008 ^ 0.6 - Watermelon 64 0 0.005 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.024 ^ NT - TOTA L 6,554 0

Fenamiphos sulfoxide (metabolite of Fenamiphos)

Apples 528 0 0.002 - 0.004 0.25 0.05 Eggplan t 736 0 0.044 ^ 0.1 - Grapes 523 9 1.7 0.001 - 0.002 0.001 ^ 0.10 - Lettuce 527 0 0.002 - 0.004 NT - Orange Juice 528 0 0.012 ^ 0.60 - Oranges 525 0 0.012 ^ 0.60 -

Appendix B. Page 20 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm
Pears 394 0 0.001 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.005 ^ NT - TOTA L 3,825 9

Fenarimol (fungicide)

Apples 743 0 0.010 - 0.015 0.1 0.3 Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.010 ^ NT - Grapes 739 1 0.1 0.025 ^ 0.015 - 0.025 0.2 0.3 Lettuce 527 0 0.010 ^ NT - Pears 555 0 0.015 - 0.025 0.1 0.3 Watermelon 64 0 0.025 ^ NT - TOTA L 3,369 1

Fenbuconazole (fungicide)

Apples 395 0 0.0009 ^ NT 0.1 Cauliflower (V-4 ) 604 4 0.7 0.002 - 0.004 0.0009 ^ NT - Grapefrui t 742 26 3.5 0.0007 - 0.001 0.0004 - 0.030 0.5 - Grapes 523 0 0.005 ^ NT 10 Lettuce (V-1) 440 1 0.2 0.002 ^ 0.0009 ^ NT - Orange Juice 546 0 0.030 ^ NT - Oranges 525 0 0.030 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.005 ^ NT 0.1 Watermelon 64 0 0.005 ^ NT - TOTA L 4,233 31

Fenhexamid (fungicide) Plums 573 9 1.6 0.032 - 0.10 0.019 ^ 1.5 - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.019 ^ 1.5 - Strawberries 517 165 31.9 0.036 - 1.9 0.035 ^ 3.0 - TOTA L 1,243 174

Fenitrothion (insecticide)

Apples 528 0 0.003 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.003 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.003 ^ NT - TOTA L 1,796 0

Fenpropathrin (insecticide)

Apples 743 56 7.5 0.026 - 0.25 0.016 - 0.020 5.0 5 Cantaloupe 558 0 0.016 - 0.020 0.5 - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.016 ^ 3.0 - Eggplan t 736 0 0.022 ^ NT 0.2 Grapefrui t 742 0 0.007 - 0.020 2.0 - Grapes 739 13 1.8 0.019 - 0.56 0.015 - 0.020 5.0 5 Lettuce 527 0 0.016 ^ NT - Orange Juice 744 0 0.020 ^ 2.0 - Oranges 741 0 0.020 ^ 2.0 - Pears 555 7 1.3 0.033 - 0.14 0.015 - 0.020 5.0 5 Strawberries 737 87 11.8 0.010 - 0.59 0.006 - 0.020 2.0 - Watermelon 182 0 0.015 - 0.020 0.5 - Winter Squash 731 0 0.016 - 0.020 0.5 - TOTA L 8,476 163

Fenpyroximate (acaricide )

Apples 132 7 5.3 0.003 - 0.042 0.0006 ^ 0.40 - Cauliflowe r 216 0 0.0006 ^ NT - Lettuce 103 0 0.0006 ^ NT - TOTA L 451 7

Fenthion (insecticide)

Apples 528 0 0.002 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.002 ^ NT -

Appendix B. Page 21 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm Grapes 523 0 0.008 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.002 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.008 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.008 ^ NT - TOTA L 2,777 0

Fenvalerate (insecticide) (isomer of Esfenvalerate)

Watermelon 59 0 0.030 ^ 1.0 0.5 TOTA L 59 0

Fluazifop butyl (herbicide)

Apples 132 0 0.0003 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 216 0 0.0003 ^ NT - Lettuce 103 0 0.0003 ^ NT - TOTA L 451 0

Fludioxonil (fungicide)

Apples 528 0 0.012 - 0.040 5.0 - Cantaloupe 414 0 0.020 - 0.036 0.03 - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.012 - 0.27 2.0 - Eggplan t 736 0 0.13 ^ 0.01 - Grapes 739 101 13.7 0.011 - 0.50 0.010 - 0.020 1.0 2 Green Beans 181 0 0.015 - 0.050 0.4 - Green Beans, Frozen 555 0 0.015 - 0.050 0.4 - Lettuce 725 0 0.012 - 0.080 30 - Orange Juice 528 0 0.015 ^ 10 - Oranges 525 0 0.015 ^ 10 - Pears 394 0 0.010 ^ 5.0 - Plums 573 118 20.6 0.18 - 1.0 0.11 ^ 5.0 5 Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.11 ^ 5.0 5 Strawberries 216 48 22.2 0.025 - 0.46 0.015 - 0.020 2.0 3 Watermelon 182 0 0.010 - 0.030 0.03 - Winter Squash 518 0 0.036 ^ 0.01 - TOTA L 7,708 267

Flumioxazin (herbicide) Eggplan t 736 0 0.050 ^ NT - TOTA L 736 0

Fluridone (herbicide)

Apples 215 0 0.035 ^ 0.1 - Cantaloupe 540 0 0.016 - 0.035 0.1 - Grapefrui t 499 0 0.004 - 0.050 0.1 - Grapes 216 0 0.035 ^ 0.1 - Green Beans 181 0 0.035 - 0.15 0.1 - Green Beans, Frozen 555 0 0.035 - 0.15 0.1 - Lettuce 198 0 0.035 - 0.070 0.1 - Orange Juice 744 0 0.035 - 0.036 0.1 - Oranges 741 0 0.035 - 0.036 0.1 - Pears 161 0 0.035 ^ 0.1 - Strawberries 733 0 0.0003 - 0.035 0.1 - Watermelon 118 0 0.016 - 0.035 0.1 - Winter Squash 713 0 0.016 - 0.035 0.1 - TOTA L 5,614 0

Folpet (fungicide)

Apples 215 0 0.015 - 0.017 25 - Cantaloupe 206 0 0.015 - 0.066 15 3 Grapes 739 16 2.2 0.025 - 0.14 0.015 - 0.017 25 2 Lettuce 216 0 0.015 - 0.017 50 - Orange Juice 528 0 0.012 ^ NT - Oranges 525 0 0.012 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.015 ^ NT -

Appendix B. Page 22 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm
Strawberries 737 1 0.1 0.12 ^ 0.015 - 0.017 25 20 Watermelon 182 0 0.008 - 0.015 15 - Winter Squash 27 0 0.066 ^ NT - TOTA L 3,769 17

Fonofos (insecticide)

Apples 528 0 0.002 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.002 ^ NT - Grapes 523 0 0.005 ^ NT - Green Beans 181 0 0.002 - 0.005 NT - Green Beans, Frozen 555 0 0.002 - 0.005 NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.002 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.005 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.005 ^ NT - TOTA L 3,513 0

Forchlorfenuron (plant growth regulator)

Apples 441 0 0.0001 ^ 0.01 - Cauliflowe r 124 0 0.0005 ^ NT - Lettuce 191 0 0.0005 ^ NT - TOTA L 756 0

Halosulfuron methyl (herbicide)

Watermelon 59 0 0.001 ^ 0.1 - TOTA L 59 0

Heptachlor (insecticide)

Apples 528 0 0.002 ^ NT - Cantaloupe 558 0 0.003 - 0.006 0.05 AL - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.002 ^ 0.05 AL - Eggplan t 736 0 0.004 ^ 0.03 AL - Grapefrui t 742 0 0.003 - 0.006 0.05 AL 0.01 Grapes 523 0 0.0008 ^ 0.05 AL - Green Beans 127 0 0.002 ^ 0.05 AL - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.002 ^ 0.05 AL - Lettuce 743 0 0.002 - 0.006 0.05 AL - Orange Juice 744 0 0.003 - 0.006 0.05 AL 0.01 Oranges 741 0 0.003 - 0.006 0.05 AL 0.01 Pears 555 0 0.0008 - 0.006 0.05 AL - Plums 573 0 0.004 ^ 0.05 AL - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.004 ^ 0.05 AL - Watermelon 182 0 0.0008 - 0.003 0.05 AL - Winter Squash 731 0 0.003 - 0.006 0.05 AL - TOTA L 8,772 0

Heptachlor epoxide (metabolite of Heptachlor)

Apples 528 0 0.004 ^ NT - Cantaloupe 558 0 0.004 - 0.006 0.05 AL - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.004 ^ 0.05 AL - Grapefrui t 742 0 0.004 - 0.006 0.05 AL - Grapes 523 0 0.002 ^ 0.05 AL - Green Beans 181 0 0.001 - 0.006 0.05 AL - Green Beans, Frozen 555 0 0.001 - 0.006 0.05 AL - Lettuce 743 0 0.004 - 0.006 0.05 AL - Orange Juice 744 0 0.004 - 0.006 0.05 AL 10 Oranges 741 0 0.004 - 0.006 0.05 AL 10 Pears 555 0 0.002 - 0.006 0.05 AL - Watermelon 182 0 0.002 - 0.004 0.05 AL - Winter Squash 731 7 1.0 0.006 - 0.059 0.004 - 0.006 0.05 AL - TOTA L 7,524 7

Appendix B. Page 23 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm
Heptachlor epoxide cis (metabolite of Heptachlor) Eggplan t 736 0 0.004 ^ NT - Plums 573 0 0.004 ^ NT - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.004 ^ NT - TOTA L 1,462 0

Heptachlor epoxide trans (metabolite of Heptachlor) Eggplan t 736 0 0.004 ^ NT - Plums 573 0 0.004 ^ NT - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.004 ^ NT - TOTA L 1,462 0

Hexachlorobenzene - HCB (impurity of Quintozene)

Apples 528 0 0.001 ^ NT - Cantaloupe 396 0 0.003 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.001 ^ 0.1 - Grapes 523 0 0.0008 ^ NT - Green Beans 181 0 0.002 ^ 0.1 - Green Beans, Frozen 555 0 0.002 ^ 0.1 - Lettuce 527 0 0.001 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.0008 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.0008 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.003 ^ NT - TOTA L 4,427 0

Hexaconazole (fungicide)

Orange Juice 528 0 0.020 ^ NT - Oranges 525 0 0.020 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.010 ^ NT - TOTA L 1,117 0

Hydroprene (insect growth regulator)

Apples 528 0 0.013 ^ 0.2 - Cantaloupe 396 0 0.013 ^ 0.2 - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.013 ^ 0.2 - Lettuce 527 0 0.013 ^ 0.2 - Watermelon 59 0 0.010 ^ 0.2 - Winter Squash 518 0 0.013 ^ 0.2 - TOTA L 2,769 0

3-Hydroxycarbofuran (metabolite of Carbofuran ) Apples 528 0 0.0006 ^ NT - Cantaloupe 558 1 0.2 0.067 ^ 0.004 - 0.012 0.2 - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.0006 ^ NT - Grapes 739 0 0.004 - 0.010 0.2 - Green Beans 126 0 0.020 ^ NT - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.020 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.0006 ^ NT - Orange Juice 528 0 0.010 ^ NT - Oranges 525 0 0.010 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.010 ^ NT - Strawberries 733 0 0.004 - 0.007 0.2 - Watermelon 182 0 0.004 - 0.010 0.4 - Winter Squash 731 0 0.004 - 0.012 0.6 - TOTA L 6,707 1

5-Hydroxythiabendazole (metabolite of Thiabendazole ) Orange Juice 132 0 0.010 ^ 10 - Oranges 87 0 0.010 ^ 10 - Strawberries 521 0 0.002 ^ 5.0 - TOTA L 740 0

Appendix B. Page 24 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm
Imazalil (fungicide)

Apples 528 0 0.010 - 0.13 NT 5 Cantaloupe 396 0 0.030 ^ NT 2 Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.010 ^ NT - Grapefrui t 742 365 49.2 0.045 - 0.55 0.030 - 0.045 10.0 5 Grapes 523 0 0.005 ^ NT - Lettuce 512 0 0.010 ^ NT - Orange Juice 744 11 1.5 0.050 - 0.25 0.030 ^ 10.0 5 Oranges 741 550 74.2 0.050 - 0.79 0.030 ^ 10.0 5 Pears 394 0 0.005 ^ NT 5 Watermelon 64 0 0.010 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.030 ^ NT - TOTA L 5,903 926

Imidacloprid (insecticide)

Apples 743 198 26.6 0.0002 - 0.015 0.0001 - 0.009 0.6 0.5 Cantaloupe 162 8 4.9 0.015 ^ 0.009 ^ 0.5 0.2 Cauliflowe r 741 629 84.9 0.0002 - 0.047 0.0001 - 0.0002 3.5 0.5 Grapefrui t 719 0 0.009 - 0.014 0.7 1 Grapes 739 134 18.1 0.010 - 0.47 0.009 - 0.010 1.0 1 Lettuce 743 543 73.1 0.0002 - 0.19 0.0001 - 0.009 3.5 2 Orange Juice 744 0 0.009 - 0.010 0.7 1 Oranges 741 2 0.3 0.015 - 0.095 0.009 - 0.010 0.7 1 Pears 555 22 4.0 0.010 - 0.098 0.009 - 0.010 0.6 1 Strawberries 733 9 1.2 0.015 - 0.27 0.009 - 0.033 0.50 - Watermelon 123 15 12.2 0.010 - 0.18 0.009 - 0.010 0.50 0.2 Winter Squash 213 7 3.3 0.015 ^ 0.009 ^ 0.5 1 TOTA L 6,956 1,567

Indoxacarb (insecticide) Grapes 523 0 0.010 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.010 ^ 0.20 - Watermelon 64 0 0.010 ^ NT - TOTA L 981 0

Iprodione (fungicide)

Apples 528 0 0.008 ^ NT 5 Cantaloupe 396 0 0.008 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.008 - 0.028 NT - Grapes 739 119 16.1 0.025 - 1.6 0.015 - 0.023 60.0 10 Green Beans 181 11 6.1 0.025 - 0.39 0.015 - 0.021 2.0 2 Green Beans, Frozen 555 10 1.8 0.025 - 0.22 0.015 - 0.021 2.0 2 Lettuce 743 14 1.9 0.014 - 1.2 0.008 - 0.056 25.0 25 Pears (V-6) 395 6 1.5 0.038 - 0.39 0.021 - 0.023 NT 5 Plums 573 227 39.6 0.065 - 7.1 0.039 ^ 20.0 - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.039 ^ 20.0 - Strawberries 737 13 1.8 0.035 - 2.5 0.015 - 0.029 15 10 Watermelon 86 0 0.015 - 0.023 NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.008 ^ NT - TOTA L 6,345 400

Iprodione metabolite isomer (metabolite of Iprodione)

Apples 513 0 0.098 - 1.4 NT - Cauliflowe r 711 0 0.098 - 0.66 NT - Lettuce 469 1 0.2 0.16 ^ 0.098 - 1.4 25.0 - Strawberries 521 0 0.062 ^ 15 - TOTA L 2,214 1

Kresoxim-methyl (fungicide)

Apples 292 0 0.003 ^ 0.5 0.2 Cauliflowe r 170 0 0.003 ^ NT - Lettuce 338 0 0.003 ^ NT - TOTA L 800 0
Appendix B. Page 25 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm
Lindane - BHC gamma (insecticide)

Apples 743 0 0.002 - 0.003 1 - Cantaloupe 558 0 0.002 - 0.006 3 - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.003 ^ 1 - Eggplan t 736 0 0.005 ^ 1 - Grapefrui t 742 0 0.002 - 0.005 0.5 AL - Grapes 739 0 0.002 ^ 1 - Green Beans 181 0 0.001 - 0.002 0.5 AL - Green Beans, Frozen 555 1 0.2 0.002 ^ 0.001 - 0.002 0.5 AL - Lettuce 743 0 0.002 - 0.003 3 - Orange Juice 744 0 0.002 ^ 0.5 AL - Oranges 741 0 0.002 ^ 0.5 AL - Pears 555 0 0.002 ^ 1 - Plums 573 0 0.004 ^ 1 - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.004 ^ 1 - Strawberries 216 0 0.002 ^ 1 - Watermelon 182 0 0.002 ^ 3 - Winter Squash 731 0 0.002 - 0.006 3 - TOTA L 9,633 1

Linuron (herbicide)

Apples 528 0 0.003 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 725 0 0.003 ^ NT - Grapes 523 0 0.008 ^ NT - Green Beans 127 0 0.015 ^ NT - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.015 ^ NT - Lettuce (V-2) 527 2 0.4 0.005 ^ 0.003 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.008 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.008 ^ NT - TOTA L 3,283 2

Malathion (insecticide)

Apples 743 0 0.003 - 0.004 8 2 Cantaloupe 558 0 0.004 - 0.007 8 - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.003 ^ 8 - Eggplan t 736 2 0.3 0.013 - 0.041 0.008 ^ 8 - Grapefrui t 742 1 0.1 0.002 ^ 0.001 - 0.004 8 4 Grapes 739 0 0.004 ^ 8 8 Green Beans 181 0 0.004 - 0.008 8 1 Green Beans, Frozen 555 0 0.004 - 0.008 8 1 Lettuce 743 1 0.1 0.007 ^ 0.003 - 0.004 8 - Orange Juice 744 0 0.004 ^ 8 4 Oranges 741 0 0.004 ^ 8 4 Pears 555 0 0.004 ^ 8 - Plums 573 0 0.008 ^ 8 - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.008 ^ 8 - Strawberries 737 117 15.9 0.001 - 0.28 0.0007 - 0.004 8 1 Watermelon 182 0 0.004 - 0.006 8 - Winter Squash 731 1 0.1 0.007 ^ 0.004 - 0.007 8 - TOTA L 10,154 122

Malathion oxygen analog (metabolite of Malathion)

Apples 743 0 0.003 ^ NT - Cantaloupe 558 0 0.003 - 0.007 NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.003 ^ NT - Eggplan t 736 0 0.019 ^ NT - Grapefruit (V-5) 742 5 0.7 0.002 ^ 0.001 - 0.003 NT - Grapes 739 0 0.003 - 0.006 NT - Green Beans 181 0 0.003 - 0.005 NT - Green Beans, Frozen 555 0 0.003 - 0.005 NT - Lettuce 743 0 0.003 ^ NT - Orange Juice 744 0 0.003 ^ NT -

Appendix B. Page 26 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm Oranges 741 0 0.003 ^ NT - Pears 555 0 0.003 - 0.006 NT - Plums 573 0 0.019 ^ NT - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.019 ^ NT - Strawberries (V-16 ) 737 16 2.2 0.002 - 0.030 0.0009 - 0.003 NT - Watermelon 182 0 0.003 - 0.006 NT - Winter Squash 731 0 0.003 - 0.007 NT - TOTA L 10,154 21

Metalaxyl (fungicide)

Apples 700 0 0.006 - 0.040 0.2 1 Cantaloupe 558 11 2.0 0.014 - 0.017 0.008 - 0.010 1.0 0.2 Cauliflowe r 710 2 0.3 0.010 ^ 0.006 - 0.083 1.0 0.5 Eggplan t 736 0 0.020 ^ 1.0 - Grapefrui t 742 0 0.010 - 0.040 1.0 5 Grapes 739 12 1.6 0.041 - 0.39 0.010 - 0.015 2.0 1 Green Beans 181 0 0.010 - 0.015 0.2 - Green Beans, Frozen 555 0 0.010 - 0.015 0.2 - Lettuce 743 11 1.5 0.010 - 0.13 0.006 - 0.083 5.0 2 Orange Juice 744 0 0.010 ^ 1.0 5 Oranges 741 0 0.010 ^ 1.0 5 Pears 394 0 0.015 ^ NT 1 Plums 573 0 0.020 ^ 1.0 - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.020 ^ 1.0 - Strawberries 737 48 6.5 0.017 - 0.35 0.010 - 0.019 10.0 - Watermelon 182 1 0.5 0.017 ^ 0.008 - 0.015 1.0 0.2 Winter Squash 731 7 1.0 0.014 - 0.10 0.008 - 0.010 1.0 0.2 TOTA L 9,919 92

Methamidophos (insecticide) (also a metabolite of Acephate)

Apples 743 0 0.001 - 0.002 0.02 - Cantaloupe 558 5 0.9 0.003 - 0.023 0.002 - 0.004 0.5 - Eggplan t 736 49 6.7 0.007 - 0.37 0.004 ^ 1.0 - Grapefrui t 214 0 0.002 ^ 0.02 - Grapes 524 1 0.2 0.003 ^ 0.002 - 0.008 0.02 - Green Beans 181 45 24.9 0.003 - 1.0 0.002 - 0.005 1 - Green Beans, Frozen 555 141 25.4 0.003 - 0.27 0.002 - 0.005 1 - Lettuce 743 20 2.7 0.002 - 0.026 0.001 - 0.002 1.0 - Orange Juice 744 0 0.002 ^ 0.02 - Oranges 741 0 0.002 ^ 0.02 - Pears 555 0 0.002 - 0.008 0.02 - Plums 573 2 0.3 0.007 ^ 0.004 ^ 0.02 - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.004 ^ 0.02 - Strawberries 216 1 0.5 0.003 ^ 0.002 ^ 0.02 - Watermelon 182 2 1.1 0.006 - 0.069 0.002 - 0.008 0.5 - Winter Squash (X-3) 731 8 1.1 0.003 - 0.17 0.002 - 0.004 0.02 - TOTA L 8,149 274

Methidathion (insecticide)

Apples 743 0 0.002 - 0.004 0.05 0.5 Cantaloupe 396 0 0.010 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.002 ^ NT - Grapefrui t 214 0 0.004 ^ 2.0 2 Grapes 523 0 0.004 ^ NT 1 Lettuce 527 0 0.002 ^ NT - Orange Juice 744 1 0.1 0.008 ^ 0.004 - 0.005 2.0 2 Oranges 741 8 1.1 0.007 - 0.032 0.004 - 0.005 2.0 2 Pears 555 1 0.2 0.007 ^ 0.004 ^ 0.05 1 Plums 573 0 0.003 ^ 0.05 0.2 Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.003 ^ 0.05 0.2 Watermelon 64 0 0.004 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.010 ^ NT - TOTA L 6,492 10

Appendix B. Page 27 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm
Methiocarb (insecticide) (analyzed as sulfoxide)

Apples 513 0 0.0006 ^ NT - Cauliflower (V-1 ) 711 1 0.1 0.001 ^ 0.0006 ^ NT - Grapes 523 0 0.010 ^ NT - Green Beans 127 0 0.015 ^ NT - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.015 ^ NT - Lettuce 512 0 0.0006 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.010 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.010 ^ NT - TOTA L 3,239 1

Methomyl (insecticide)

Apples 743 4 0.5 0.002 - 0.028 0.001 - 0.014 1 2 Cantaloupe 558 88 15.8 0.020 - 0.14 0.012 - 0.014 0.2 0.2 Cauliflowe r 741 14 1.9 0.002 - 0.041 0.001 ^ 2 2 Eggplan t 736 22 3.0 0.020 - 0.22 0.012 ^ 0.2 - Grapefrui t 719 0 0.014 ^ 2 1 Grapes 739 42 5.7 0.010 - 0.80 0.010 - 0.014 5 5 Green Beans 181 7 3.9 0.025 - 0.34 0.014 - 0.015 2 1 Green Beans, Frozen 555 8 1.4 0.023 - 0.20 0.014 - 0.015 2 1 Lettuce 743 100 13.5 0.002 - 2.2 0.001 - 0.014 5 5 Orange Juice 744 0 0.010 - 0.014 2 1 Oranges 741 0 0.010 - 0.014 2 1 Pears 555 0 0.010 - 0.014 4 2 Strawberries 216 36 16.7 0.023 - 1.9 0.014 ^ 2 - Watermelon 182 16 8.8 0.007 - 0.11 0.004 - 0.014 0.2 0.2 Winter Squash 731 0 0.012 - 0.014 0.2 0.1 TOTA L 8,884 337

Methoprene (insect growth regulator)

Apples 528 0 0.014 - 0.048 NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.048 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.014 - 0.096 NT - TOTA L 1,796 0

Methoxychlor Total (insecticide)

Apples 528 0 0.002 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.002 ^ NT - Green Beans 127 0 0.005 ^ NT - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.005 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.002 ^ NT - TOTA L 2,318 0

Methoxychlor olefin (metabolite of Methoxychlor )

Apples 528 0 0.001 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 727 0 0.001 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.001 ^ NT - TOTA L 1,782 0

Methoxychlor p,p' (isomer of Methoxychlor)

Cantaloupe 396 0 0.009 ^ NT - Grapes 523 0 0.008 ^ NT - Green Beans 54 0 0.020 ^ NT - Green Beans, Frozen 160 0 0.010 - 0.020 NT - Orange Juice 528 0 0.020 ^ NT - Oranges 525 0 0.020 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.008 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.008 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.009 ^ NT - TOTA L 3,162 0

Appendix B. Page 28 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm
Methoxyfenozide (insecticide)

Watermelon 59 0 0.001 ^ 0.3 - TOTA L 59 0

Metolachlor (herbicide)

Apples 528 0 0.001 ^ NT - Cantaloupe 396 0 0.016 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.001 ^ NT - Grapes 523 0 0.015 ^ NT - Green Beans 181 0 0.008 - 0.010 0.3 - Green Beans, Frozen 555 0 0.008 - 0.010 0.3 - Lettuce 527 0 0.001 ^ NT - Orange Juice 528 0 0.010 ^ NT - Oranges 525 0 0.010 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.015 ^ NT - Plums 573 0 0.023 ^ 0.1 - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.023 ^ 0.1 - Watermelon 64 0 0.015 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.016 ^ NT - TOTA L 6,206 0

Metribuzin (herbicide)

Apples 528 0 0.013 - 0.044 NT - Cantaloupe 396 0 0.016 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.013 - 0.044 NT - Grapes 523 0 0.015 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.013 ^ NT - Orange Juice 528 0 0.030 ^ NT - Oranges 525 0 0.030 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.015 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.015 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.016 ^ NT - TOTA L 4,744 0

Mevinphos Total (insecticide)

Apples 528 0 0.002 ^ NT - Cantaloupe 558 0 0.002 - 0.012 0.5 - Grapes 739 0 0.002 - 0.008 0.5 - Green Beans 127 0 0.017 ^ NT - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.017 ^ NT - Lettuce 743 0 0.002 ^ 0.5 - Orange Juice 528 0 0.004 ^ NT - Oranges 525 0 0.004 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.008 ^ NT - Strawberries 737 2 0.3 0.001 ^ 0.0006 - 0.002 1.0 - Watermelon 182 0 0.002 - 0.008 0.5 - Winter Squash 518 0 0.012 ^ NT - TOTA L 5,974 2

Monocrotophos (insecticide)

Cantaloupe 396 0 0.007 ^ NT - Grapes 523 0 0.008 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.008 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.008 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.007 ^ NT - TOTA L 1,895 0

Myclobutanil (fungicide)

Apples 728 33 4.5 0.002 - 0.020 0.0009 - 0.020 0.5 0.5 Cantaloupe 558 0 0.008 - 0.020 0.20 - Cauliflowe r 711 0 0.0009 ^ 0.03 - Eggplan t 736 0 0.040 ^ 0.03 -

Appendix B. Page 29 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm Grapes 739 117 15.8 0.033 - 0.35 0.020 - 0.023 1.0 1 Green Beans 181 17 9.4 0.025 - 0.18 0.015 - 0.020 1.0 - Green Beans, Frozen 555 10 1.8 0.025 - 0.033 0.015 - 0.020 1.0 - Lettuce 728 0 0.0009 - 0.020 0.03 - Orange Juice 528 0 0.020 ^ NT - Oranges 525 0 0.020 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.023 ^ NT 0.5 Plums 573 0 0.033 ^ 2.0 0.2 Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.033 ^ 2.0 0.2 Strawberries (X-2 ) 737 256 34.7 0.002 - 0.69 0.001 - 0.020 0.50 1 Watermelon 182 0 0.020 - 0.023 0.20 - Winter Squash 731 2 0.3 0.014 ^ 0.008 - 0.020 0.20 - TOTA L 8,759 435

Napropamide (herbicide)

Apples 743 0 0.007 - 0.020 0.1 - Cantaloupe 558 1 0.2 0.067 ^ 0.020 - 0.040 0.1 - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.007 ^ 0.1 - Eggplan t 736 0 0.033 ^ 0.1 - Grapefrui t 742 0 0.020 ^ 0.1 - Lettuce 527 0 0.007 ^ NT - Orange Juice 744 0 0.020 ^ 0.1 - Oranges 741 0 0.020 ^ 0.1 - Pears 161 0 0.020 ^ 0.1 - Plums 573 0 0.033 ^ 0.1 - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.033 ^ 0.1 - Watermelon 118 0 0.020 ^ 0.1 - Winter Squash 731 0 0.020 - 0.040 0.1 - TOTA L 7,268 1

Naptalam (herbicide)

Cantaloupe 88 0 0.24 ^ 0.1 - Winter Squash 60 0 0.24 ^ NT - TOTA L 148 0

1-Naphthal (metabolite of Carbaryl )

Apples ( V-2) 54 2 3.7 0.017 - 0.11 0.010 ^ NT - Cantaloupe 523 3 0.6 0.017 ^ 0.010 - 0.16 10 - Grapefrui t 196 1 0.5 0.017 ^ 0.010 ^ 10 - Grapes 198 11 5.6 0.017 - 0.25 0.010 ^ 10 - Green Beans 54 0 0.010 ^ 10 - Green Beans, Frozen 142 0 0.010 ^ 10 - Lettuce 180 0 0.010 ^ 10 - Orange Juice 198 0 0.010 ^ 10 - Oranges 198 2 1.0 0.017 - 0.083 0.010 ^ 10 - Pears (V-10) 90 10 11.1 0.017 - 0.24 0.010 ^ NT - Strawberries 180 3 1.7 0.017 ^ 0.010 ^ 10 - Watermelon 105 0 0.010 - 0.018 10 - Winter Squash 678 0 0.010 - 0.16 10 - TOTA L 2,796 32

Nitrapyrin (bactericide )

Cantaloupe 44 0 0.016 ^ NT - Winter Squash 43 0 0.016 ^ NT - TOTA L 87 0

Norflurazon (herbicide)

Apples 685 0 0.005 - 0.032 0.1 - Cantaloupe 396 0 0.018 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 404 0 0.016 - 0.11 NT - Grapefrui t 214 0 0.020 ^ 0.2 - Grapes 739 0 0.010 - 0.020 0.1 - Lettuce 440 0 0.005 - 0.11 NT -
Appendix B. Page 30 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm Orange Juice 744 0 0.020 ^ 0.2 - Oranges 741 0 0.020 ^ 0.2 - Pears 555 0 0.010 - 0.020 0.1 - Plums 573 0 0.053 ^ 0.1 - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.053 ^ 0.1 - Watermelon 64 0 0.010 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.018 ^ NT - TOTA L 6,226 0

Norflurazon desmethyl (metabolite of Norflurazon)

Apples 743 0 0.030 - 0.060 0.1 - Cantaloupe 44 0 0.021 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.060 ^ NT - Grapefrui t 214 0 0.030 - 0.050 0.2 - Grapes 739 0 0.010 - 0.030 0.1 - Lettuce 527 0 0.018 - 0.12 NT - Orange Juice 744 0 0.030 ^ 0.2 - Oranges 741 0 0.030 ^ 0.2 - Pears 555 0 0.010 - 0.030 0.1 - Plums 573 0 0.041 ^ 0.1 - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.041 ^ 0.1 - Watermelon 64 0 0.010 ^ NT - Winter Squash 43 0 0.021 ^ NT - TOTA L 5,881 0

Omethoate (insecticide) (also metabolite of Dimethoate)

Apples 743 5 0.7 0.004 - 0.037 0.002 - 0.004 2 - Cantaloupe 558 13 2.3 0.007 - 0.062 0.004 - 0.018 1 - Cauliflowe r 725 12 1.7 0.004 - 0.013 0.002 ^ 2 - Grapefrui t 214 0 0.004 ^ 2 - Grapes 739 6 0.8 0.012 - 0.050 0.004 - 0.008 1 - Green Beans 181 18 9.9 0.007 - 0.13 0.004 - 0.005 2 - Green Beans, Frozen 555 5 0.9 0.008 - 0.031 0.004 - 0.005 2 - Lettuce 743 64 8.6 0.004 - 0.077 0.002 - 0.004 2 - Orange Juice 744 0 0.004 ^ 2 - Oranges 741 1 0.1 0.007 ^ 0.004 ^ 2 - Pears 555 1 0.2 0.012 ^ 0.004 - 0.008 2 - Watermelon 182 5 2.7 0.007 - 0.013 0.004 - 0.008 1 - Winter Squash 518 0 0.018 ^ NT - TOTA L 7,198 130

Oryzalin (herbicide) Grapes 523 0 0.010 ^ 0.05 - Pears 394 0 0.010 ^ 0.05 - Watermelon 64 0 0.020 ^ NT - TOTA L 981 0

Oxadixyl (fungicide)

Apples 528 0 0.013 ^ NT - Cantaloupe 558 0 0.008 - 0.015 NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.013 ^ NT - Lettuce 728 0 0.013 - 0.015 NT - Orange Juice 528 0 0.015 ^ NT - Oranges 525 0 0.015 ^ NT - Winter Squash 519 1 0.2 0.025 ^ 0.008 - 0.015 0.1 - TOTA L 4,127 1

Oxamyl (insecticide)

Apples 743 2 0.3 0.006 - 0.022 0.0003 - 0.008 2 2 Cantaloupe 558 4 0.7 0.013 - 0.062 0.008 ^ 2.0 2 Cauliflowe r 711 0 0.0003 - 0.0009 NT - Eggplan t 736 12 1.6 0.025 - 0.16 0.015 ^ 2.0 - Grapefrui t 719 0 0.004 - 0.008 3 5
Appendix B. Page 31 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm Grapes 523 0 0.010 ^ NT - Green Beans (V-1) 126 1 0.8 0.10 ^ 0.020 ^ NT - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.020 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.0003 - 0.003 NT - Orange Juice 744 0 0.008 - 0.010 3 5 Oranges 741 0 0.010 ^ 3 5 Pears 555 0 0.008 - 0.010 2.0 - Watermelon 182 6 3.3 0.022 - 0.16 0.004 - 0.010 2 - Winter Squash 731 0 0.008 ^ 2.0 - TOTA L 7,991 25

Oxamyl oxime (metabolite of Oxamyl )

Apples 215 0 0.010 ^ 2 2 Cantaloupe 148 8 5.4 0.017 - 0.16 0.010 ^ 2.0 2 Grapefrui t 683 0 0.010 - 0.014 3 5 Grapes 523 0 0.010 ^ NT - Orange Juice 672 0 0.010 ^ 3 5 Oranges 525 0 0.010 ^ 3 5 Pears 555 0 0.010 ^ 2.0 - Watermelon 123 13 10.6 0.014 - 0.24 0.010 ^ 2 - Winter Squash 213 0 0.010 ^ 2.0 - TOTA L 3,657 21

Oxychlordane (metabolite of Chlordane )

Apples 528 0 0.002 - 0.008 NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.002 - 0.008 NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.002 - 0.008 NT - TOTA L 1,796 0

Oxydemeton methyl (insecticide ) Grapefrui t 220 0 0.020 ^ 1 - Strawberries 521 0 0.015 ^ 2 - TOTA L 741 0

Oxydemeton methyl sulfone (metabolite of Oxydemeton methyl )

Apples 743 0 0.009 - 0.015 1 - Cantaloupe 162 0 0.015 ^ 0.3 - Eggplan t 736 1 0.1 0.047 ^ 0.028 ^ 1 - Grapefrui t 720 0 0.005 - 0.015 1 - Grapes 739 0 0.015 - 0.023 0.1 - Green Beans 181 0 0.010 - 0.015 0.5 - Green Beans, Frozen 555 0 0.010 - 0.015 0.5 - Lettuce 743 0 0.009 - 0.015 2 - Orange Juice 744 0 0.015 ^ 1 - Oranges 741 0 0.015 ^ 1 - Pears 555 0 0.015 - 0.023 0.3 - Plums 573 0 0.028 ^ 1 - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.028 ^ 1 - Strawberries 737 0 0.002 - 0.015 2 - Watermelon 182 0 0.012 - 0.023 0.3 - Winter Squash 213 0 0.015 ^ 0.3 - TOTA L 8,477 1

Oxyfluorfen (herbicide )

Apples 743 0 0.010 - 0.030 0.05 - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.010 ^ 0.05 - Grapes 739 0 0.025 - 0.030 0.05 - Lettuce 527 0 0.003 - 0.019 NT - Orange Juice 528 0 0.030 ^ NT - Oranges 525 0 0.030 ^ NT - Pears 555 0 0.025 - 0.030 0.05 - Plums 573 0 0.032 ^ 0.05 -

Appendix B. Page 32 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.032 ^ 0.05 - Watermelon 64 0 0.025 ^ NT - TOTA L 5,148 0

Parathion (insecticide)

Apples 528 0 0.005 ^ NT - Cantaloupe 396 0 0.006 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.005 ^ NT - Grapes 523 0 0.008 ^ NT - Green Beans 127 0 0.017 ^ NT - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.017 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.005 ^ NT - Orange Juice 528 0 0.003 ^ NT - Oranges 525 0 0.003 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.008 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.008 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.006 ^ NT - TOTA L 5,266 0

Parathion methyl (insecticide)

Apples 528 0 0.002 ^ NT 0.2 Cantaloupe 396 0 0.006 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.002 ^ NT - Grapes 523 0 0.004 ^ NT 0.5 Green Beans 127 0 0.008 ^ NT - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.008 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.002 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.004 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.004 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.006 ^ NT - TOTA L 4,213 0

Parathion methyl oxygen analog (metabolite of Parathion methyl )

Apples 528 0 0.005 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.005 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.005 ^ NT - TOTA L 1,796 0

Parathion oxygen analog (metabolite of Parathion)

Apples 528 0 0.003 ^ NT - Cantaloupe 396 0 0.016 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.003 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.003 ^ NT - Orange Juice 528 0 0.003 ^ NT - Oranges 525 0 0.003 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.016 ^ NT - TOTA L 3,763 0

Pendimethalin (herbicide)

Cantaloupe 396 0 0.016 ^ NT - Grapes 523 0 0.015 ^ NT - Green Beans 181 0 0.015 - 0.020 NT - Green Beans, Frozen 555 0 0.015 - 0.020 NT - Orange Juice 528 0 0.020 ^ NT - Oranges 525 0 0.020 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.015 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.015 ^ NT - Winter Squash (V-2) 518 2 0.4 0.027 ^ 0.016 ^ NT - TOTA L 3,684 2

Pentachloroaniline - PCA (metabolite of Quintozene)

Apples 528 0 0.001 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.001 ^ 0.1 -
Appendix B. Page 33 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm Grapes 523 0 0.005 ^ NT - Green Beans 127 0 0.010 ^ 0.1 - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.010 ^ 0.1 - Lettuce (V-1) 527 1 0.2 0.002 ^ 0.001 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.005 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.005 ^ NT - TOTA L 3,299 1

Pentachlorobenzene - PCB (metabolite of Quintozene)

Apples 528 0 0.002 - 0.006 NT - Cantaloupe 396 0 0.002 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.002 ^ 0.1 - Grapes 523 0 0.002 ^ NT - Green Beans 163 0 0.002 - 0.003 0.1 - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.003 ^ 0.1 - Lettuce 527 0 0.002 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.002 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.002 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.002 ^ NT - TOTA L 4,249 0

Pentachlorophenyl methyl sulfide (metabolite of Quintozene )

Apples 528 0 0.001 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.001 - 0.005 0.1 - Grapes 523 0 0.005 ^ NT - Green Beans 125 0 0.010 ^ 0.1 - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.010 ^ 0.1 - Lettuce 527 0 0.001 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.005 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.005 ^ NT - TOTA L 3,297 0

Permethrin Total (insecticide)

Cantaloupe 396 1 0.3 0.048 ^ 0.029 ^ 3.0 0.1 Grapes 523 0 0.038 ^ NT 2 Green Beans 126 0 0.075 ^ NT 1 Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.075 ^ NT 1 Pears 394 0 0.038 ^ 3.0 2 Watermelon 123 0 0.030 - 0.038 3.0 - Winter Squash 518 0 0.029 ^ 3.0 0.5 TOTA L 2,475 1

Permethrin cis (isomer of Permethrin)

Apples 743 1 0.1 0.025 ^ 0.002 - 0.012 0.05 2 Cantaloupe 162 0 0.012 ^ 3.0 0.1 Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.002 - 0.008 1.0 0.5 Eggplan t 736 4 0.5 0.022 - 0.045 0.013 ^ 1.0 1 Lettuce 743 146 19.7 0.004 - 1.7 0.002 - 0.012 20.0 2 Orange Juice (V-1) 529 1 0.2 0.020 ^ 0.012 - 0.015 NT 0.5 Oranges 525 0 0.015 ^ NT 0.5 Pears 161 0 0.012 ^ 3.0 2 Watermelon 59 0 0.012 - 0.015 3.0 - Winter Squash 213 3 1.4 0.020 ^ 0.012 ^ 3.0 0.5 TOTA L 4,612 155

Permethrin trans (isomer of Permethrin)

Apples 743 1 0.1 0.037 ^ 0.002 - 0.012 0.05 2 Cantaloupe 162 0 0.012 ^ 3.0 0.1 Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.002 - 0.008 1.0 0.5 Eggplan t 736 6 0.8 0.022 - 0.046 0.013 ^ 1.0 1 Lettuce 743 131 17.6 0.004 - 2.2 0.002 - 0.012 20.0 2 Orange Juice (V-1) 529 1 0.2 0.020 ^ 0.012 - 0.015 NT 0.5 Oranges 525 0 0.015 ^ NT 0.5
Appendix B. Page 34 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm
Pears 161 0 0.012 ^ 3.0 2 Watermelon 59 0 0.012 - 0.015 3.0 - Winter Squash 213 2 0.9 0.020 - 0.046 0.012 ^ 3.0 0.5 TOTA L 4,612 141

Phenmedipham (herbicide)

Cantaloupe 396 0 0.097 ^ NT - Winter Squash (V-4) 518 4 0.8 0.16 ^ 0.097 ^ NT - TOTA L 914 4

Phenothrin (insecticide)

Grapes 523 0 0.075 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.075 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.075 ^ NT - TOTA L 981 0

Phenthoate (insecticide)

Apples 528 0 0.006 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.006 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.006 ^ NT - TOTA L 1,796 0

o-Phenylphenol (fungicide) Apples 743 49 6.6 0.005 - 0.53 0.003 - 0.010 25 - Cantaloupe 558 34 6.1 0.014 - 0.24 0.008 - 0.010 10 - Cauliflower (V-1 ) 741 1 0.1 0.005 ^ 0.003 ^ NT - Eggplant (V-1) 1 1 100.0 0.057 ^ 0.010 ^ NT - Grapefrui t 742 75 10.1 0.017 ^ 0.010 - 0.076 10 10 Grapes 523 0 0.015 ^ NT - Green Beans (V-31) 51 31 60.8 0.017 - 0.020 0.010 ^ NT - Green Beans, Froz. (V-68) 68 68 100.0 0.017 - 0.095 0.010 ^ NT - Lettuce (V-80) 639 80 12.5 0.017 ^ 0.003 - 0.010 NT - Orange Juice 744 387 52.0 0.017 - 0.096 0.010 ^ 10 0.5 Oranges 741 254 34.3 0.017 - 0.084 0.010 ^ 10 10 Pears 555 76 13.7 0.015 - 13 0.010 - 0.015 25.0 20 Plums 573 8 1.4 0.017 ^ 0.010 ^ 20 - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.010 ^ 20 - Strawberries (V-3) 3 3 100.0 0.017 ^ 0.010 ^ NT - Watermelon (V-28) 123 28 22.8 0.017 ^ 0.010 - 0.015 NT - Winter Squash (V-128) 689 128 18.6 0.014 - 0.035 0.008 - 0.010 NT - TOTA L 7,647 1,223

Phorate (insecticide)

Apples 528 0 0.002 ^ NT - Cantaloupe 396 0 0.012 ^ NT - Grapes 523 0 0.004 ^ NT - Green Beans 181 0 0.003 - 0.011 0.1 0.1 Green Beans, Frozen 555 0 0.003 - 0.008 0.1 0.1 Lettuce 527 0 0.002 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.004 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.004 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.012 ^ NT - TOTA L 3,686 0

Phorate oxygen analog (metabolite of Phorate)

Apples 528 0 0.001 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.001 ^ NT - TOTA L 1,055 0

Phorate sulfone (metabolite of Phorate)

Apples 528 0 0.003 ^ NT - Cantaloupe 396 0 0.012 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.003 ^ NT -

Appendix B. Page 35 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm Grapes 523 0 0.012 ^ NT - Green Beans 181 0 0.004 - 0.005 0.1 0.1 Green Beans, Frozen 555 0 0.004 - 0.005 0.1 0.1 Lettuce 527 0 0.003 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.012 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.012 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.012 ^ NT - TOTA L 4,427 0

Phorate sulfoxide (metabolite of Phorate)

Apples 528 0 0.009 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.009 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.009 ^ NT - TOTA L 1,796 0

Phosalone (insecticide)

Apples 743 1 0.1 0.020 ^ 0.002 - 0.006 10.0 2 Grapes 739 0 0.006 - 0.015 10.0 - Green Beans 127 0 0.030 ^ NT - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.030 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.002 ^ NT - Pears 555 0 0.006 - 0.015 10.0 2 Plums 573 0 0.039 ^ 15.0 2 Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.039 ^ 15.0 2 Watermelon 64 0 0.015 ^ NT - TOTA L 3,876 1

Phosmet (insecticide)

Apples 743 144 19.4 0.008 - 0.28 0.005 ^ 10 10 Cantaloupe 396 0 0.012 ^ NT - Grapefrui t 214 0 0.005 ^ 5 5 Grapes 739 16 2.2 0.008 - 1.7 0.005 - 0.008 10 10 Green Beans 127 0 0.017 ^ NT - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.017 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.005 ^ NT - Orange Juice 744 0 0.005 ^ 5 5 Oranges 741 0 0.005 ^ 5 5 Pears 555 82 14.8 0.008 - 0.86 0.005 - 0.008 10 10 Plums 573 111 19.4 0.005 - 0.58 0.003 ^ 5 - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.003 ^ 5 - Watermelon 64 0 0.008 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.012 ^ NT - TOTA L 6,489 353

Phosphamidon (insecticide)

Apples 528 0 0.003 ^ NT - Cantaloupe 396 0 0.029 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.003 ^ NT - Grapes 523 0 0.015 ^ NT - Green Beans 127 0 0.033 ^ NT - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.033 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.003 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.015 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.015 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.029 ^ NT - TOTA L 4,213 0

Piperonyl butoxide (insecticide)

Apples 743 0 0.005 - 0.016 8 - Cantaloupe 558 0 0.008 - 0.010 8 1 Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.005 ^ E X

- Eggplan t 736 0 0.012 ^ E X

- Grapefrui t 214 0 0.010 ^ E X 5

Appendix B. Page 36 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm Grapes 739 0 0.010 - 0.015 8 - Green Beans 181 0 0.010 - 0.015 8 - Green Beans, Frozen 555 0 0.010 - 0.015 8 - Lettuce 743 2 0.3 0.021 - 0.025 0.005 - 0.010 E X 50 Orange Juice 744 0 0.010 ^ 8 0.05 Oranges 741 1 0.1 0.017 ^ 0.010 ^ 8 5 Pears 555 0 0.010 - 0.015 8 - Plums 573 0 0.012 ^ 8 - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 5 3.3 0.020 ^ 0.012 ^ 8 - Watermelon 86 0 0.010 - 0.015 E X 1 Winter Squash 731 2 0.3 0.092 - 0.22 0.008 - 0.016 E X 1 TOTA L 8,793 10

Pirimicarb (insecticide)

Apples 528 0 0.010 ^ NT 1 Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.010 ^ NT 1 Lettuce 527 0 0.010 ^ NT 1 Watermelon 64 0 0.005 ^ NT - TOTA L 1,860 0

Pirimiphos methyl (insecticide)

Apples 528 0 0.002 ^ NT - Cantaloupe 396 0 0.016 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.002 ^ NT - Grapes 523 0 0.004 ^ NT - Green Beans 127 0 0.008 ^ NT - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.008 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.002 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.004 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.004 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.016 ^ NT - TOTA L 4,213 0

Prallethrin (insecticide)

Apples 215 0 0.010 ^ 1.0 - Cantaloupe 558 0 0.010 - 0.024 1.0 - Eggplan t 736 0 0.028 ^ 1.0 - Grapefrui t 742 0 0.010 - 0.064 1.0 - Grapes 216 0 0.010 ^ 1.0 - Lettuce 216 0 0.010 ^ 1.0 - Orange Juice 744 0 0.010 ^ 1.0 - Oranges 741 0 0.010 ^ 1.0 - Pears 161 0 0.010 ^ 1.0 - Plums 573 0 0.028 ^ 1.0 - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.028 ^ 1.0 - Strawberries 737 0 0.010 - 0.082 1.0 - Watermelon 182 0 0.010 ^ 1.0 - Winter Squash 731 0 0.010 - 0.024 1.0 - TOTA L 6,705 0

Prochloraz (fungicide)

Grapes 523 0 0.002 ^ NT - Green Beans 127 0 0.003 ^ NT - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.003 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.002 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.002 ^ NT - TOTA L 1,503 0

Procymidone (fungicide)

Grapes 523 0 0.005 ^ NT 5 Pears 394 0 0.005 ^ NT 1 Watermelon 64 0 0.005 ^ NT - TOTA L 981 0

Appendix B. Page 37 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm
Profenofos (insecticide)

Apples 528 0 0.002 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.002 ^ NT - Grapes 523 0 0.011 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.002 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.011 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.011 ^ NT - TOTA L 2,777 0

Prometryn (herbicide)

Apples 528 0 0.007 ^ NT - Cantaloupe 396 0 0.049 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.007 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.007 - 0.022 NT - Orange Juice 528 0 0.010 ^ NT - Oranges 525 0 0.010 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.049 ^ NT - TOTA L 3,763 0

Pronamide (herbicide)

Apples 743 0 0.006 - 0.083 0.1 - Cantaloupe 396 0 0.018 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.006 ^ NT - Grapes 739 0 0.007 - 0.008 0.1 - Green Beans 126 0 0.015 ^ NT - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.015 ^ NT - Lettuce 743 4 0.5 0.010 - 0.053 0.006 - 0.008 1.0 - Pears 555 0 0.007 - 0.008 0.1 - Plums 573 0 0.014 ^ 0.1 - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.014 ^ 0.1 - Watermelon 64 0 0.008 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.018 ^ NT - TOTA L 5,746 4

Propamocarb hydrochloride (fungicide)

Watermelon 64 0 0.010 ^ 1.5 - TOTA L 64 0

Propargite (insecticide)

Apples 528 0 0.026 - 0.088 NT 3 Cantaloupe 396 0 0.008 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.026 ^ NT - Grapefrui t 742 0 0.020 - 0.030 5 3 Grapes 739 0 0.015 - 0.020 10 7 Lettuce 527 0 0.026 ^ NT - Orange Juice 744 0 0.020 ^ 5 0.3 Oranges 741 0 0.020 ^ 5 3 Pears 394 0 0.015 ^ NT 5 Watermelon 64 0 0.015 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.008 ^ NT - TOTA L 6,134 0

Propetamphos (insecticide)

Apples 743 0 0.002 - 0.003 0.1 - Cantaloupe 558 0 0.003 - 0.008 0.1 - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.002 ^ 0.1 - Grapefrui t 214 0 0.003 ^ 0.1 - Grapes 739 0 0.003 - 0.004 0.1 - Lettuce 743 0 0.002 - 0.003 0.1 - O range J u i ce 744 0 0

. 003 ^ 0

. 1

- Oranges 741 0 0.003 ^ 0.1 - Pears 555 0 0.003 - 0.004 0.1 -

Appendix B. Page 38 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm
Plums 573 0 0.008 ^ 0.1 - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.008 ^ 0.1 - Strawberries 737 0 0.0006 - 0.003 0.1 - Watermelon 182 0 0.003 - 0.006 0.1 - Winter Squash 731 0 0.003 - 0.008 0.1 - TOTA L 8,154 0

Propham (herbicide)

Watermelon 59 0 0.008 ^ NT - TOTA L 59 0

Propiconazole (fungicide)

Apples 410 0 0.005 ^ NT - Cantaloupe 396 0 0.016 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 572 0 0.005 ^ NT - Lettuce 469 0 0.005 ^ NT - Orange Juice 528 0 0.036 ^ NT - Oranges 525 0 0.036 ^ NT - Plums 573 2 0.3 0.060 - 0.12 0.036 ^ 1.0 1 Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 1 0.7 0.26 ^ 0.036 ^ 1.0 1 Watermelon 64 0 0.010 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.016 ^ NT - TOTA L 4,208 3

Propoxur (insecticide)

Grapes 175 0 0.010 ^ NT - Green Beans 83 0 0.015 ^ NT - Pears 218 0 0.010 ^ NT - TOTA L 476 0

Pymetrozine (insecticide)

Cauliflowe r 648 0 0.005 ^ 0.5 - Lettuce 469 1 0.2 0.033 ^ 0.005 ^ 0.6 - TOTA L 1,117 1

Pyraclostrobin (fungicide)

Apples 132 7 5.3 0.002 - 0.016 0.001 ^ 1.5 - Cauliflowe r 216 0 0.001 ^ 5.0 - Eggplan t 736 0 0.030 ^ 1.4 - Grapefrui t 528 40 7.6 0.0003 - 0.003 0.0003 ^ 2.0 - Lettuce 132 1 0.8 0.005 ^ 0.001 ^ 29.0 - Watermelon 123 0 0.001 - 0.003 0.5 - TOTA L 1,867 48

Pyridaben (insecticide, acaricide)

Apples 215 0 0.015 ^ 0.5 - Grapefrui t 742 5 0.7 0.001 - 0.002 0.001 - 0.015 0.5 - Grapes 216 1 0.5 0.025 ^ 0.015 ^ 1.5 - Orange Juice 744 0 0.010 - 0.015 0.5 - Oranges 741 0 0.010 - 0.015 0.5 - Pears 161 0 0.015 ^ 0.75 - Plums 573 0 0.041 ^ 2.5 - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.041 ^ 2.5 - TOTA L 3,545 6

Pyrimethanil (fungicide)

Apples 132 6 4.5 0.0005 - 0.76 0.0003 ^ 3.0 - Cauliflowe r 216 0 0.0003 ^ NT - Lettuce 132 0 0.0003 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.003 ^ NT - TOTA L 544 6

Appendix B. Page 39 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm
Pyriproxyfen (insecticide, growth regulator)

Apples 743 1 0.1 0.022 ^ 0.005 - 0.013 0.2 - Cantaloupe 162 0 0.005 ^ 0.10 - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.013 ^ 0.70 - Eggplan t 736 0 0.012 ^ 0.2 - Grapefrui t 258 0 0.005 - 0.045 0.3 0.5 Grapes 739 0 0.005 - 0.015 0.10 - Green Beans 181 0 0.005 - 0.030 0.10 - Green Beans, Frozen 555 0 0.005 - 0.030 0.10 - Lettuce 743 0 0.005 - 0.013 0.10 - Orange Juice 744 0 0.005 - 0.008 0.3 0.5 Oranges 741 0 0.005 - 0.008 0.3 0.5 Pears 555 0 0.005 - 0.015 0.2 - Plums 573 0 0.012 ^ 1.0 - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.012 ^ 1.0 - Strawberries 216 4 1.9 0.008 - 0.079 0.005 ^ 0.30 - Watermelon 182 0 0.004 - 0.015 0.10 - Winter Squash 213 0 0.005 - 0.009 0.10 - TOTA L 8,235 5

Quinoxyfen (fungicide)

Watermelon 118 0 0.0005 - 0.004 0.30 - TOTA L 118 0

Quintozene - PCNB (fungicide) (parent of HCB, PCA and PCB )

Apples 454 0 0.010 - 0.064 NT - Cantaloupe 396 0 0.004 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 576 0 0.003 - 0.040 0.1 - Grapes 523 0 0.002 ^ NT - Green Beans 181 12 6.6 0.001 ^ 0.0008 - 0.003 0.1 0.1 Green Beans, Frozen 555 2 0.4 0.001 - 0.012 0.0008 - 0.003 0.1 0.1 Lettuce 513 0 0.003 - 0.040 NT - Pears 394 0 0.002 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.002 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.004 ^ NT - TOTA L 4,174 14

Resmethrin (insecticide)

Apples 215 0 0.010 ^ 3.0 - Cantaloupe 558 0 0.010 - 0.032 3.0 - Grapefrui t 742 0 0.010 - 0.015 3.0 - Grapes 674 0 0.010 - 0.075 3.0 - Lettuce 435 0 0.007 - 0.010 3.0 - Orange Juice 744 0 0.010 ^ 3.0 - Oranges 741 0 0.010 ^ 3.0 - Pears 533 0 0.010 - 0.030 3.0 - Strawberries 216 0 0.010 ^ 3.0 - Watermelon 182 0 0.010 - 0.030 3.0 - Winter Squash 731 0 0.010 - 0.032 3.0 - TOTA L 5,771 0

Resmethrin cis (isomer of Resmethrin)

Apples 528 0 0.002 - 0.008 3.0 - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.002 - 0.008 3.0 - Lettuce 527 0 0.002 - 0.016 3.0 - TOTA L 1,796 0

Resmethrin trans (isomer of Resmethrin)

Apples 528 0 0.002 - 0.008 3.0 - Cauliflowe r 725 0 0.002 - 0.008 3.0 - Lettuce 527 0 0.002 - 0.008 3.0 - TOTA L 1,780 0

Appendix B. Page 40 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm
Sethoxydim (herbicide) Cantaloupe 308 0 0.13 ^ 4.0 - Cauliflowe r 216 0 0.001 ^ 5.0 - Lettuce 132 0 0.001 ^ 4.0 - Watermelon 59 0 0.050 ^ 4.0 - Winter Squash 276 0 0.13 ^ 4.0 - TOTA L 991 0

Simazine (herbicide)

Apples 743 0 0.002 - 0.010 0.25 - Cantaloupe 396 0 0.018 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.002 ^ NT - Grapefrui t 214 0 0.010 ^ 0.25 - Grapes 739 0 0.010 - 0.011 0.25 - Green Beans 127 0 0.023 ^ NT - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.023 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.002 ^ NT - Orange Juice 744 0 0.010 ^ 0.25 - Oranges 741 1 0.1 0.017 ^ 0.010 ^ 0.25 - Pears 555 0 0.010 - 0.011 0.25 - Plums 573 0 0.036 ^ 0.25 - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.036 ^ 0.25 - Strawberries 216 0 0.010 ^ 0.25 - Watermelon 86 0 0.010 - 0.011 NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.018 ^ NT - TOTA L 7,468 1

Spinosad (insecticide) (spinosyns A and D ) Watermelon 59 0 0.003 - 0.004 0.3 0.2 TOTA L 59 0

Spinosad A (insecticide) Strawberries 429 26 6.1 0.035 - 0.13 0.021 ^ 1.0 - Watermelon 64 0 0.002 ^ 0.3 0.2 TOTA L 493 26

Spinosad D (insecticide) Strawberries 429 8 1.9 0.033 - 0.089 0.020 ^ 1.0 - Watermelon 64 0 0.002 ^ 0.3 0.2 TOTA L 493 8

Spirodiclofen (acaricide) Watermelon 64 0 0.010 ^ NT - TOTA L 64 0

Spiromesifen (insecticide) Watermelon 64 0 0.002 ^ 0.1 - TOTA L 64 0

Sulfentrazone (herbicide) Strawberries 517 0 0.020 ^ 0.60 - TOTA L 517 0

Sulprofos (insecticide)

Apples 528 0 0.002 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.002 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.002 ^ NT - TOTA L 1,796 0

Appendix B. Page 41 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm
Tebuconazole (fungicide) Apples 513 0 0.002 ^ NT 0.5 Cauliflowe r 725 0 0.002 ^ NT - Grapes 739 48 6.5 0.033 - 0.30 0.020 - 0.077 5.0 2 Green Beans 127 0 0.045 ^ NT - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.045 ^ NT - Lettuce 512 0 0.002 ^ NT - Orange Juice 528 0 0.020 ^ NT - Oranges 525 0 0.020 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.023 ^ NT 0.5 Watermelon 64 0 0.023 ^ NT - TOTA L 4,522 48

Tebufenozide (insecticide) Apples 698 9 1.3 0.005 - 0.038 0.003 ^ 1.0 1 Cauliflowe r 588 0 0.003 ^ 5.0 - Grapes 739 0 0.001 - 0.003 3.0 2 Green Beans 54 0 0.003 ^ NT - Green Beans, Frozen 160 0 0.003 ^ NT - Lettuce 700 7 1.0 0.005 - 0.033 0.003 ^ 10.0 10 Pears 555 6 1.1 0.002 - 0.15 0.001 - 0.003 1.5 1 Watermelon 64 0 0.005 ^ NT - TOTA L 3,558 22

Tecnazene (fungicide) Apples 382 0 0.005 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 525 0 0.005 - 0.032 NT - Grapes 523 0 0.001 ^ NT - Green Beans 127 0 0.002 ^ NT - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.002 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.005 - 0.032 NT - Pears 394 0 0.001 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.001 ^ NT - TOTA L 2,937 0

TEPP (insecticide) Apples 528 0 0.006 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.006 ^ NT - TOTA L 1,055 0

Terbacil (herbicide) Apples 743 0 0.006 - 0.020 0.3 - Cantaloupe 396 0 0.018 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 725 0 0.006 ^ NT - Grapes 523 0 0.015 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.006 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.015 ^ NT - Strawberries 216 0 0.020 ^ 0.1 - Watermelon 182 0 0.015 - 0.080 0.4 - Winter Squash 518 0 0.018 ^ NT - TOTA L 4,224 0

Terbufos (insecticide) Apples 528 0 0.002 ^ NT - Cantaloupe 396 0 0.015 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.002 ^ NT - Grapes 523 0 0.005 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.002 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.005 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.005 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.015 ^ NT - TOTA L 3,691 0

Appendix B. Page 42 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm
Terbufos sulfone (metabolite of Terbufos) Apples 528 0 0.002 ^ NT - Cantaloupe 396 0 0.018 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.002 ^ NT - Grapes 523 0 0.005 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.002 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.005 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.018 ^ NT - TOTA L 3,627 0

Tetrachlorvinphos (insecticide) Apples 528 0 0.003 ^ NT - Cantaloupe 396 0 0.008 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.003 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.003 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.008 ^ NT - TOTA L 2,710 0

Tetradifon (insecticide) Apples 743 0 0.006 - 0.032 5 - Cantaloupe 558 0 0.006 - 0.028 1 - Cauliflowe r 726 0 0.032 - 0.13 NT - Grapefrui t 742 0 0.006 - 0.012 2 - Grapes 739 0 0.004 - 0.012 5 - Green Beans 127 0 0.008 ^ NT - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.008 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.010 - 0.064 NT - Orange Juice 744 0 0.006 - 0.012 2 - Oranges 741 0 0.006 - 0.012 2 - Pears 555 0 0.004 - 0.012 5 - Plums 573 0 0.011 ^ 5 - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.011 ^ 5 - Strawberries 521 0 0.004 - 0.008 5 - Watermelon 182 0 0.004 - 0.024 1 - Winter Squash 731 0 0.006 - 0.028 1 - TOTA L 8,757 0

Tetrahydrophthalimide - THPI (metabolite of Captafol and Captan ) Apples 743 114 15.3 0.033 - 1.5 0.020 - 0.27 25 - Cantaloupe 558 0 0.009 - 0.040 25 - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.020 - 0.13 2 Grapes 739 75 10.1 0.067 - 0.68 0.040 - 0.075 50 - Green Beans 7 7 100.0 0.067 - 0.53 0.040 ^ 25 - Lettuce 707 0 0.020 - 0.065 100 - Pears 555 48 8.6 0.067 - 1.9 0.040 - 0.075 25 - Strawberries 216 146 67.6 0.060 - 2.3 0.040 ^ 25 - Watermelon 123 0 0.040 - 0.075 25 - Winter Squash 731 9 1.2 0.015 - 0.11 0.009 - 0.065 25 - TOTA L 5,120 399

Tetramethrin (insecticide) Grapes 523 0 0.015 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.015 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.015 ^ NT - TOTA L 981 0

Thiabendazole (fungicide) (parent of 5-hydroxythiabendazole ) Apples 743 654 88.0 0.0002 - 7.0 0.0001 - 0.030 10 3 Cantaloupe 558 3 0.5 0.075 - 0.33 0.030 - 0.045 15.0 - Cauliflower (V-14 ) 741 14 1.9 0.0002 - 0.001 0.0001 - 0.0005 NT - Grapefrui t 214 73 34.1 0.050 - 0.33 0.030 ^ 10 10 Grapes 523 0 0.050 ^ NT -

Appendix B. Page 43 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm Lettuce (V-7) 527 7 1.3 0.0005 - 0.001 0.0005 ^ NT - Orange Juice 744 4 0.5 0.050 - 0.23 0.030 ^ 10 10 Oranges 741 324 43.7 0.050 - 0.61 0.030 ^ 10 10 Pears 555 370 66.7 0.050 - 2.9 0.030 - 0.050 10 3 Strawberries 737 3 0.4 0.003 - 0.90 0.002 - 0.030 5.0 - Watermelon 86 0 0.010 - 0.030 NT - Winter Squash 731 4 0.5 0.075 - 0.77 0.030 - 0.045 1 - TOTA L 6,900 1,456

Thiacloprid (insecticide) Apples 132 4 3.0 0.003 - 0.018 0.0004 ^ 0.3 - Cauliflowe r 216 0 0.0004 ^ NT - Lettuce 132 0 0.0004 ^ NT - TOTA L 480 4

Thiamethoxam (insecticide) (also parent of clothianidin) Apples 528 0 0.015 - 0.050 0.2 - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.015 - 0.060 NT - Lettuce (V-1) 527 1 0.2 0.025 ^ 0.015 - 0.050 NT - Watermelon 182 7 3.8 0.002 - 0.004 0.001 - 0.050 0.20 - TOTA L 1,978 8

Thiazopyr (herbicide) Grapefrui t 528 0 0.001 ^ 0.05 - Orange Juice 528 0 0.010 ^ 0.05 - Oranges 525 0 0.010 ^ 0.05 - TOTA L 1,581 0

Thiobencarb (herbicide) Apples 132 0 0.0006 ^ NT - Cauliflowe r 216 0 0.0006 ^ NT - Lettuce 348 0 0.0006 - 0.010 0.2 - Orange Juice 528 0 0.010 ^ NT - Oranges 525 0 0.010 ^ NT - TOTA L 1,749 0

Thiodicarb (insecticide) Lettuce 216 0 0.002 ^ 35 5 TOTA L 216 0

Tri-Allate (herbicide ) Grapes 523 0 0.015 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.015 ^ NT - Watermelon 64 0 0.015 ^ NT - TOTA L 981 0

Triadimefon (fungicide) Apples 713 0 0.0009 - 0.025 1.0 0.5 Cantaloupe 558 1 0.2 0.038 ^ 0.023 - 0.025 0.3 0.1 Cauliflowe r 696 0 0.0009 ^ NT - Grapes 739 1 0.1 0.073 ^ 0.011 - 0.025 1.0 0.5 Green Beans 127 0 0.023 ^ NT - Green Beans, Frozen 395 0 0.023 ^ NT - Lettuce 483 0 0.0009 - 0.003 NT - Orange Juice 528 0 0.025 ^ NT - Oranges 525 0 0.025 ^ NT - Pears 555 0 0.011 - 0.025 1.0 0.5 Strawberries 216 0 0.025 ^ NT 0.1 Watermelon 182 0 0.011 - 0.025 0.3 0.1 Winter Squash 731 5 0.7 0.038 ^ 0.023 - 0.025 0.3 0.1 TOTA L 6,448 7

Appendix B. Page 44 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm
Triadimenol (fungicide) (also a metabolite of Triadimefon) Cantaloupe 162 0 0.015 ^ 0.3 2 Grapes 216 12 5.6 0.025 - 0.22 0.015 ^ 1.0 2 Pears 161 0 0.015 ^ 1.0 0.5 Watermelon 123 0 0.011 - 0.015 0.3 2 Winter Squash 213 0 0.015 ^ 0.3 2 TOTA L 875 12

1,2,4-Triazole (common metabolite of triazole compounds) Strawberries 499 2 0.4 0.065 ^ 0.036 - 0.039 *** - TOTA L 499 2

Triazole acetic acid - TAA (common metabolite of triazole compounds ) Strawberries 499 0 0.011 - 0.012 NT - TOTA L 499 0

Triazole alanine - TA (common metabolite of triazole compounds) Strawberries 521 58 11.1 0.060 - 0.063 0.036 - 0.038 *** - TOTA L 521 58

Trifloxystrobin (fungicide) Apples 132 13 9.8 0.0002 - 0.007 0.0001 ^ 0.50 0.7 Cauliflowe r 216 0 0.0001 ^ NT - Grapefrui t 528 0 0.0004 ^ 0.3 - Lettuce (V-1) 118 1 0.8 0.0002 ^ 0.0001 ^ NT - Orange Juice 528 0 0.010 ^ 0.3 - Oranges 504 0 0.010 ^ 0.3 - Watermelon 182 0 0.001 - 0.005 0.5 - TOTA L 2,208 14

Triflumizole (fungicide) Apples 213 0 0.050 ^ 0.5 - Cantaloupe 558 0 0.040 - 0.050 0.5 - Grapes 739 0 0.020 - 0.050 2.5 - Pears 555 0 0.020 - 0.050 0.5 - Strawberries 216 3 1.4 0.083 ^ 0.050 ^ 2.0 - Watermelon 123 0 0.003 - 0.050 0.5 - Winter Squash 731 0 0.040 - 0.050 0.5 - TOTA L 3,135 3

Trifluralin (herbicide) Apples 528 0 0.0005 ^ NT - Cantaloupe 558 0 0.008 - 0.017 0.05 - Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.0005 ^ 0.05 - Grapefrui t 742 0 0.001 - 0.017 0.05 - Grapes 739 0 0.015 - 0.017 0.05 - Green Beans 181 0 0.015 - 0.017 0.05 - Green Beans, Frozen 555 0 0.015 - 0.017 0.05 - Lettuce 743 17 2.3 0.0008 - 0.005 0.0005 - 0.017 0.05 - Orange Juice 744 0 0.017 ^ 0.05 - Oranges 741 0 0.017 ^ 0.05 - Pears 394 0 0.015 ^ NT - Plums 573 0 0.021 ^ 0.05 - Plums, Dried (Prunes) 153 0 0.021 ^ 0.05 - Watermelon 182 0 0.015 - 0.017 0.05 - Winter Squash 731 0 0.008 - 0.017 0.05 - TOTA L 8,305 17

Triforine (fungicide) Apples 528 0 0.003 ^ 0.01 2 Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.003 ^ NT - Lettuce 527 0 0.003 ^ NT - TOTA L 1,796 0
Appendix B. Page 45 of 46Pesticide / Commodity Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples with Detections Range of Values Detected, ppm Range of LODs, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Codex MRL/EMRL, ppm

V ernolate (herbicide) Cantaloupe 308 0 0.016 ^ NT - Winter Squash 276 0 0.016 ^ NT - TOTA L 584 0

V inclozolin (fungicide) Apples 528 0 0.004 ^ NT 1 Cantaloupe 396 0 0.014 ^ NT 1 Cauliflowe r 741 0 0.004 ^ NT 1 Grapes 523 0 0.003 ^ NT 5 Green Beans 181 0 0.003 - 0.010 2.0 2 Green Beans, Frozen 555 263 47.4 0.004 - 0.40 0.003 - 0.010 2.0 2 Lettuce 743 4 0.5 0.006 - 0.017 0.004 - 0.010 10.0 5 Orange Juice 528 0 0.003 ^ NT - Oranges 525 0 0.003 ^ NT - Pears 394 0 0.003 ^ NT 1 Watermelon 64 0 0.003 ^ NT - Winter Squash 518 0 0.014 ^ NT - TOTA L 5,696 267

Zoxamide (fungicide) Cantaloupe 44 0 0.020 ^ 1.0 - Watermelon 59 0 0.025 ^ 1 - Winter Squash 43 0 0.020 ^ 1.0 - TOTA L 146 0

NOTES Only one distinct detected concentration or LOD value was reported for the pair. No tolerance level was set for that pesticide/commodity pair. Numbers shown are Action Levels established by FDA and Codex Extraneous Maximum Residue Levels (EMRLs) for som e pesticides. Under FQPA, responsibility for establishing tolerances in lieu of action levels has been transferred to EPA. In t he interim, action levels are used. EX = Exempt from a tolerance when applied to growing crops (pre-harvest) in accordance with Good Agricultural Practices. The re ader is advised to consult 40 CFR Part 180 for specific compounds. NOTE: Some commodity/compound pairs have post-harvest tolerances, but because PDP cannot ascertain when application occurred, the tolerance exemption is used. Safe use in spot and/or crack and crevice treatments. Residue was found where no tolerance was established by EPA. Following "V" are the number of occurrences. Residue was found which exceeds EPA tolerance or FDA action level. Following "X" are the number of occurrences. Previously reported as lambda cyhalothrin total, which included lambda cyhalothrin (a 1:1 mixture of the cis-(1R,3R),S-enantiom e r and the cis-(1S,3S),R-enantiomer) as well as R157836 (a 1:1 mixture of the cis-(1S,3S),S-enantiomer and the cis-(1R,3R), R-enantiomer). *** = Residues of this compound were detected. This compound has been determined to be a common metabolite of the triazole clas s of chemicals. Therefore, the residues detected cannot be attributed to a single triazole compound. ** = NT = AL =

SU ^

(V) = (X) =



## M

any of the listed tolerances and MRLs are the sum of a parent compound and metabolite(s)/isomer(s). The reader is advised to refer to EPA for the complete listing of compounds in tolerance expressions and to Codex for the complete listing of compounds in MRL expressions.

Appendix B. Page 46 of 46

# Appendix C
Distribution of Residues by Pesticide in Soybeans

Appendix C shows residue detections for all soybean compounds tested, including range of values detected, range of Limits of Detection (LODs), and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Codex Maximum Residue Limit/ Extraneous Maximum Residue Limit (MRL/EMRL) tolerance references for each pair.
In 2005, PDP analyzed 668 soybean samples. A total of 44 samples (22 percent) were reported with re sidue detections. All but one of the residue detections were much lower than the established tolerances.
See Appendix B for definition of ALs and MRLs.
MRLs/EMRLs shown in this appendix ar e from the Codex Alimentarius: Proc. of Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues , 38 th 

## Session, April 3-8, 2006, Fortaleza, Brazil. Only Codex MRLs (CXLs) are listed.
EPA tolerances as published in 40 CFR Part 180 are expressed in parts per million (ppm). Because soy bean residues are expressed in parts per billion (ppb), EPA Tolerances and Codex MRLs have been multiplied by a factor of 1,000 as a basis for comparison using a single scale . There is no intention to imply any more exactness in the value than that originally expressed by EPA and Codex.
The information herein is only intended to be an initial reference. Readers are reminded that international regulations and MRLs may change and that it is important that information obtained from this table be verified with knowledgeable parties in the market of interest prior to sale or shipment of exports.Pesticide Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples w/

Detects Range of Values Detected, ppb Range of LODs, ppb EPA Tolerance Level, ppb* Codex MRL/EMRL, ppb*


### Acephate I 648 40 ^ 1,000 300

Acetochlor H 667 3.1 ^ 100 -

Alachlor H 667 2 0.3 2.0 - 5.0 1.2 ^ 200 -

Aldicarb I 668 10 ^ 20 20

Aldicarb sulfone IM 638 3.0 ^ 20 20

Aldicarb sulfoxide IM 668 10 ^ 20 20

Aldrin I 606 12.5 ^ 50 AL 50

Bendiocarb I 640 1.5 ^ SU -

Benoxacor S 658 3.0 ^ 10 -
Boscalid F 667 1.5 ^ 2,000 - Carbaryl I 668 3.0 ^ 5,000 200

Carbendazim - MBC F 668 1.5 ^ 200 200

Carbofuran I 663 3.0 ^ 200 -

Carboxin F 667 1.2 ^ 200 - Chlorimuron ethyl H 284 10 ^ 50 - Chlorpyrifos I 647 94 14.5 5.0 - 24 3.0 ^ 300 100
Clofencet P 622 30 ^ 30,000 -

Clomazone H 667 3.0 ^ 50 -

Clothianidin I 656 3.0 ^ NT - Cyfluthrin I 628 10 ^ 50 - Cyhalothrin, epimer R157836 I 279 4.0 ^ 10 -
Cyhalothrin, Total (CyhalothrinL + R157836) I 368 5.5 ^ 10 - Cypermethrin I 667 25 ^ 50 50
DDD p,p' IM 667 1.5 ^ 200 AL -
DDE p,p' IM 522 1.9 ^ 200 AL -
Deltamethrin (includes parent Tralomethrin) I 667 15 ^ 100 200

Dieldrin I 667 2.4 ^ 50 AL 50

Dimethenamid H 667 9 1.3 2.0 - 9.0 1.0 ^ 10 -

Dimethoate I 646 8.0 ^ 50 -

Disulfoton I 667 6.0 ^ 100 50

Disulfoton sulfone IM 647 30 ^ 100 50

Disulfoton sulfoxide IM 657 3.6 ^ 100 50 

## APPENDIX C. DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDUES BY PESTICIDE IN SOYBEANS

Appendix C. Page 1 of 3Pesticide Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples w/

Detects Range of Values Detected, ppb Range of LODs, ppb EPA Tolerance Level, ppb* Codex MRL/EMRL, ppb*



### Endrin I 667 5.4 ^ 50 AL -

EPTC H 599 3.0 ^ 100 -

Esfenvalerate I 667 10 ^ 50 -

Ethalfluralin H 667 0.80 ^ 50 -
Fenoxaprop ethyl H 667 1.5 ^ 50 -
Fenpropathrin I 667 4.2 ^ NT - Fluazifop butyl H 667 3.0 ^ 1,000 -

Fludioxonil F 667 8.0 ^ 10 10

Flumetsulam H 662 10 ^ 50 -

Fluridone H 647 1.0 ^ 100 - Hydroprene R 667 21 ^ 200 - 3-Hydroxycarbofuran IM 668 3.0 ^ 200 -
5-Hydroxythiabendazole FM 615 3.0 ^ 100 -
Imazaquin H 658 3.0 ^ 50 -
Imidacloprid I 668 3.0 ^ 1,000 -

Indoxacarb I 667 27 ^ 800 -

Lactofen H 667 9.0 ^ 10 -
Linuron H 614 3.0 ^ 1,000 -
Malathion I 667 35 5.2 9.7 - 73 5.8 ^ 8,000 - Malathion oxygen analog IM 667 2.7 ^ NT - Metalaxyl F 667 2.0 ^ 1,000 50
Methamidophos I 621 30 ^ 1,000 100
Methomyl I 663 3.0 ^ 200 200
Methoxyfenozide I 668 1 0.1 5.0 ^ 3.0 ^ 100 -

Metolachlor H 667 1.9 ^ 200 -

Metribuzin H 626 6.5 ^ 300 -
Myclobutanil F 647 1.9 ^ 50 -

Norflurazon H 667 15 ^ 100 -
Norflurazon desmethyl HM 607 5.0 ^ 100 -

Omethoate IM 651 4.2 ^ 50 -
Oxadixyl F 667 3.0 ^ NT -
Oxamyl I 663 3.0 ^ 200 -
Oxyfluorfen H 667 2.0 ^ 50 -
Parathion ethyl I 667 4.2 ^ 100 -

Appendix C. Page 2 of 3Pesticide Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples w/

Detects Range of Values Detected, ppb Range of LODs, ppb EPA Tolerance Level, ppb* Codex MRL/EMRL, ppb*


### Parathion methyl I 667 6.1 ^ 100 -
Parathion methyl oxygen analog IM 633 1.7 ^ NT -
Parathion oxygen analog IM 667 25 ^ NT -

Pendimethalin H 667 6.0 ^ NT -

Permethrin Total IM 667 5 0.7 15.5 ^ 9.3 ^ 50 50

Phorate I 667 4.4 ^ 100 50
Prallethrin I 667 45 ^ 1,000 -
Propetamphos I 667 1.0 ^ 100 -
Pyriproxyfen I 667 32.3 ^ 100 -
Quizalofop ethyl H 667 1.9 ^ 50 -
Resmethrin I 667 2.3 ^ 3,000 -
Spinosad A I 638 3.0 ^ 20 10

Sulfentrazone H 647 1 0.2 25 ^ 15 ^ 50 -
Tetrahydrophthalimide (THPI) FM 667 15 ^ 2,000 -

Thiabendazole F 643 1 0.2 16 ^ 3.0 ^ 100 -
Thifensulfuron methyl H 668 6.0 ^ 100 -
Trifluralin (X-1) H 667 2 0.3 3.0 - 78.1 2.0 ^ 50 -



### NOTES * = EPA Tolerances and Codex MRLs have been multiplied by a factor of 1000 as a basis for comparison using a single scale.

There is no intention to imply any more exactness in the value than that originally expressed by EPA and Codex. ^ = Only one distinct detected concentration or LOD value was reported for the pair. NT = No tolerance level was set for that pesticide/commodity pair. AL = Numbers shown are Action Levels established by FDA and Codex Extraneous Maximum Residue Levels (EMRLs) for some

pesticides. Under FQPA, responsibility for establishing tolerances in lieu of action levels has been transferred to EPA. In the interim, action levels are used. (X) = Residue was found which exceeds EPA tolerance. Following "X" are the number of occurrences.

Pesticide Types: F = Fungicide, FM = Fungicide Metabolite H = Herbicide, HM = Herbicide Metabolite I = Insecticide, IM = Insecticide Metabolite P = Plant Growth Regulator R = Insect Growth Regulator S = Herbicide Safener 

## M

any of the listed tolerances and MRLs are the sum of a parent compound and metabolite(s)/isomer(s). The reader is advised to refer to EPA for the complete listing of compounds in tolerance expressions and to Codex for the complete listing of compounds in MRL expressions.

Appendix C. Page 3 of 3

# Appendix D
Distribution of Residues by Pesticide for the Soybean Rust/Aphid Special Survey

Appendix D shows residue detections for t he soybean rust/aphid special survey, including range of values detected, range of Limits of Detection (LODs), and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Codex Maximum Residue Limit/ Extraneous Maximum Residue Limit (MRL/EMRL) tolerance references for each pair.
In 2005, PDP analyzed 306 soybean samples during October through December for 14 identified compounds used to combat soybean rust and 2 insecticides used to control Chinese aphid in response to an EPA data need. Six samples were reported with residue detections. All detections were much lower than the established tolerances.
See Appendix B for definition of MRLs.
MRLs/EMRLs shown in this appendix ar e from the Codex Alimentarius: Proc. of Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues , 38 th 

## Session, April 3-8, 2006, Fortaleza, Brazil. Only Codex MRLs (CXLs) are listed.
EPA tolerances as published in 40 CFR Part 180 are expressed in parts per million (ppm). Because soy bean residues are expressed in parts per billion (ppb), EPA Tolerances and Codex MRLs have been multiplied by a factor of 1,000 as a basis for comparison using a single scale . There is no intention to imply any more exactness in the value than than originallyexpressed by EPA and Codex.
The information herein is only intended to be an initial reference. Readers are reminded that international regulations and MRLs may change and that it is important that information obtained from this table be verified with knowledgeable parties in the market of interest prior to sale or shipment of exports.Pesticide Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples w/

Detects Range of Values Detected, ppb Range of LODs, ppb EPA Tolerance Level, ppb* Codex MRL/EMRL, ppb*



### Azoxystrobin F 306 1.0 ^ NT -

Boscalid F 306 7.0 ^ 2000 -

Cyproconazole F 306 5.0 ^ NT -

Difenoconazole F 306 3.0 ^ NT -

Epoxiconazole F 306 4.0 ^ NT -

Fenarimol F 286 31 ^ NT -

Fluquinconazole F 306 14 ^ NT -

Flutriafol F 306 4.0 ^ NT -

Myclobutanil F 306 4.0 ^ 50 -

Propiconazole F 306 3.0 ^ NT -

Pymetrozine I 306 3.0 ^ NT -

Pyraclostrobin F 306 6 2 1.0 - 2.0 1.0 ^ 40 -

Tebuconazole F 286 4.0 ^ 100 -

Tetraconazole F 286 6.0 ^ NT -

Thiamethoxam I 306 1.0 ^ NT -

Trifloxystrobin F 306 1.0 ^ NT -



### NOTES * = EPA Tolerances and Codex MRLs have been multiplied by a factor of 1000 as a basis for comparison

using a single scale. There is no intention to imply any more exactness in the value than that originally expressed by EPA and Codex. ^ = Only one distinct detected concentration or LOD value was reported for the pair. NT = No tolerance level was set for that pesticide/commodity pair.

Pesticide Types: F = Fungicide
I = Insecticide



## APPENDIX D. DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDUES FOR SOYBEAN RUST/APHID SPECIAL SURVEY

Appendix D. Page 1 of 1

# Appendix E

Distribution of Residues by Pesticide in Wheat

Appendix E shows residue detections for all wheat compounds tested, including range of values detected, range of Limits of Detection (LODs), and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Codex Maxi mum Residue Limit/Extraneous Maximum Residue Limit (MRL/EMRL) toleranc e references for each pair.
In 2005, PDP analyzed 674 wheat samples. A total of 508 samples (75 percent) were reported with residue detections. All re sidue detections were much lower than the established tolerances.
See Appendix B for definition of ALs and MRLs.
MRLs/EMRLs shown in this appendix ar e from the Codex Alimentarius: Proc. of Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues , 38 th 

## Session, April 3-8, 2006, Fortaleza, Brazil. Only Codex MRLs (CXLs) are listed.
EPA tolerances as published in 40 CFR Part 180 are expressed in parts per million (ppm). Because wheat residues are expressed in parts per billion (ppb), EPA Tolerances and Codex MRLs have been multiplied by a factor of 1,000 as a basis for comparison using a single scale . There is no intention to imply any more exactness in the value than than originallyexpressed by EPA and Codex.
The information herein is only intended to be an initial reference. Readers are reminded that international regulations and MRLs may change and that it is important that information obtained from this table be verified with knowledgeable parties in the market of interest prior to sale or shipment of exports.Pesticide Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples w/

Detects Range of Values Detected, ppb Range of LODs, ppb EPA Tolerance Level, ppb* Codex MRL/EMRL, ppb*



### Acetochlor H 654 2 0.3 5.0 ^ 3.0 ^ 20 -
Allethrin I 674 3.0 ^ 2,000 -

Atrazine H 674 3.0 ^ 250 -

Bromuconazole 46 FM 674 6.0 ^ NT -

Bromuconazole 47 FM 674 4.0 ^ NT - Carbaryl I 634 6.0 ^ 3,000 2,000

Carbofuran I 494 34 ^ 100 -

Carboxin F 674 3.0 ^ 200 - Carfentrazone ethyl H 674 3.0 ^ 100.0 - Chlorpyrifos I 674 4 0.6 10 - 42 6.0 ^ 500 500 Chlorpyrifos methyl I 674 156 23.1 32 - 2610 19 ^ 6,000 10,000 Clodinafop propargyl H 654 3.0 ^ 100 - Cyanazine H 674 1 0.1 8.0 ^ 5.0 ^ 100 - Cyfluthrin I 654 19 2.9 38 - 669 23 ^ 4,000 -
Cyhalothrin, Total (Cyhalothrin-L + R157836) I 674 1 0.1 7.0 ^ 4.0 ^ 50 - Cyproconazole F 674 11 ^ NT -
DDE p,p' IM 674 3.0 ^ 500 AL 100

Diazinon I 674 1 0.1 5.0 ^ 3.0 ^ 50 - Diazinon oxygen analog IM 674 6.0 ^ NT - Diclofop methyl H 674 3.0 ^ 100 -

Dieldrin I 674 6.0 ^ 20 AL 20

Difenoconazole F 674 4.0 ^ 100 -

Dimethoate I 674 28 ^ 40 50
Dimethomorph F 644 19 ^ NT -

Disulfoton I 674 3.0 ^ 300 200

Disulfoton sulfone IM 674 13 ^ 300 200

Endosulfan I I 674 6.0 ^ 100 200

Endosulfan II IM 674 6.0 ^ 100 200

Endosulfan sulfate IM 674 3.0 ^ 100 200
Epoxiconazole F 674 4.0 ^ NT -

Etridiazole F 654 10 ^ 50 -

Fenbuconazole F 434 18 ^ NT 100
Fenitrothion I 671 6.0 ^ NT 10,000 

## APPENDIX E. DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDUES BY PESTICIDE IN WHEAT

Appendix E. Page 1 of 3Pesticide Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples w/

Detects Range of Values Detected, ppb Range of LODs, ppb EPA Tolerance Level, ppb* Codex MRL/EMRL, ppb*



### Fludioxonil F 674 9.0 ^ 20 50
Flufenacet H 674 6.0 ^ 1,000 -

Fluridone H 674 3.0 ^ 100 -
Heptachlor epoxide IM 674 3.0 ^ NT 20

Hexaconazole F 674 4.0 ^ NT - 3-Hydroxycarbofuran IM 569 6.0 ^ 100 -

Imazalil F 674 28 ^ 50 10 Lindane (BHC gamma) I 654 3 0.5 10 - 21 6.0 ^ 100 AL 10

Linuron H 674 25 ^ 250 -
Malathion I 674 451 66.9 5.0 - 2577 3.0 ^ 8,000 8,000
Malathion oxygen analog IM 674 5.0 ^ NT -
Metalaxyl F 674 1 0.1 25 ^ 6.0 ^ 200 50
Methoprene R 634 4 0.6 22 - 279 13 ^ 5,000 5,000
Methoxychlor p,p' (V-40) IM 674 40 5.9 8.0 - 21 5.0 ^ NT -

Metolachlor H 674 3.0 ^ 100 -

Metribuzin H 634 6.0 ^ 750 -
Myclobutanil F 674 13 ^ 30 -

Omethoate IM 654 3.0 ^ 40 -
Parathion ethyl I 671 5.0 ^ 1,000 -
Parathion oxygen analog IM 654 19 ^ NT -

Phorate I 434 6 1.4 13 ^ 8.0 ^ 50 50

Phorate sulfone IM 674 5.0 ^ 50 50
Piperonyl butoxide I 674 17 2.5 10 - 42 6.0 ^ 20,000 30,000
Pirimiphos methyl (V-22) I 674 22 3.3 5.0 ^ 3.0 ^ NT 7,000
Propanil H 674 9 1.3 8.0 ^ 5.0 ^ 200 -
Propiconazole F 654 11 ^ 100 50
RH 9129 (fenbuconazole metabolite) (V-4) FM 594 4 0.7 8.0 - 81 5.0 ^ NT -
RH 9130 (fenbuconazole metabolite) FM 674 4.0 ^ NT -

TCMTB F 674 25 ^ 100 -

Tebuconazole F 640 10 ^ 50 50

Tetraconazole F 674 4.0 ^ NT -
Thiabendazole F 514 13 ^ 1,000 -

Thiamethoxam I 654 3.0 ^ 20 -

Appendix E. Page 2 of 3Pesticide Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples w/

Detects Range of Values Detected, ppb Range of LODs, ppb EPA Tolerance Level, ppb* Codex MRL/EMRL, ppb*



### Tri Allate H 654 6.0 ^ 50 -
Triadimefon F 674 3.0 ^ 1,000 100

Triadimenol F 669 6.0 ^ 50 200

Trifluralin H 654 9 1.4 10 ^ 6.0 ^ 50 -

Triticonazole F 674 4.0 ^ 50 -



### NOTES * = EPA Tolerances and Codex MRLs have been multiplied by a factor of 1000 as a basis for comparison

using a single scale. There is no intention to imply any more exactness in the value than that originally expressed by EPA and Codex. ^ = Only one distinct detected concentration or LOD value was reported for the pair. NT = No tolerance level was set for that pesticide/commodity pair. AL = Numbers shown are Action Levels established by FDA and Codex Extraneous Maximum Residue Levels (EMRLs)

for some pesticides. Under FQPA, responsibility for establishing tolerances in lieu of action levels has been transferred to EPA. In the interim, action levels are used. (V) = Residue was found where no tolerance was established by EPA. Following "V" are the number of occurrences.

Pesticide Types: F = Fungicide, FM = Fungicide Metabolite
H = Herbicide I = Insecticide, IM = Insecticide Metabolite R = Insect Growth Regulator



## M

any of the listed tolerances and MRLs are the sum of a parent compound and metabolite(s)/isomer(s). The reader is advised to refer to EPA for the complete listing of compounds in tolerance expressions and to Codex for the complete listing of compounds in MRL expressions.

Appendix E. Page 3 of 3

# Appendix F

Distribution of Residues by Pesticide in Milk

Appendix F shows residue detections for all milk compounds tested, including range of values detected, range of Limits of Detection (LODs), and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Codex Maxi mum Residue Limit/Extraneous Maximum Residue Limit (MRL/EMRL) toleranc e references for each pair.
In 2005, PDP analyzed 746 milk samples. A total of 738 samples (99 percent) were reported with residue detections. All re sidue detections were much lower than the established tolerances.
See Appendix B for definition of ALs and MRLs.

MRLs/EMRLs shown in this appendix ar e from the Codex Alimentarius: Proc. of Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues , 38 th 

## Session, April 3-8, 2006, Fortaleza, Brazil. Only Codex MRLs (CXLs) are listed.
EPA tolerances as published in 40 CFR Part 180 are expressed in parts per million (ppm). Because milk residues are expressed in parts perbillion (ppb), EPA Tolerances and Codex MRLs have been multiplied by a factor of 1,000 as a basis for comparison using a single scale . There is no intention to imply any more exactness in the value than that originally expressed by EPA and Codex.
The information herein is only intended to be an initial reference. Readers are reminded that international regulations and MRLs may change and that it is important that information obtained from this table be verified with knowledgeable parties in the market of interest prior to sale or shipment of exports.Pesticide Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples w/

Detects Range of Values Detected, ppb Range of LODs, ppb EPA Tolerance Level, ppb* Codex MRL/EMRL, ppb*



### Acephate I 746 0.090 ^ 100 20

Alachlor H 746 0.15 ^ 20 -

Aldicarb I 746 0.060 ^ NT 10

Aldicarb sulfone IM 746 0.090 ^ NT 10

Aldicarb sulfoxide IM 746 0.18 ^ NT 10

Amitraz I 746 0.75 ^ 30 10

Atrazine H 746 0.18 ^ 20 -

Bifenthrin I 746 17 2.3 0.10 - 0.67 0.060 ^ 100 50 Buprofezin I 746 0.24 ^ 10 - Carbaryl I 746 2 0.3 0.083 ^ 0.050 ^ 300 50

Carbofuran I 746 0.090 ^ 20 50 Chlorfenapyr I 746 0.090 ^ 10 - Chlorpropham H 746 0.30 ^ 50 - Chlorpyrifos I 746 0.17 ^ 10 20 Chlorpyrifos methyl I 746 0.11 ^ 50 10 Chlorpyrifos methyl O-analog IM 746 1.5 ^ 50 - Coumaphos I 746 0.11 ^ 500 - Coumaphos oxygen analog IM 746 0.40 ^ 500 - Cyfluthrin I 746 6 0.8 1.0 ^ 0.60 ^ 1,000 10 Cyhalothrin, Total (Cyhalothrin-L + R157836 epimer) I 746 155 20.8 0.25 - 1.2 0.15 ^ 200 - Cypermethrin I 746 0.60 ^ 100 50
Cyproconazole F 746 0.21 ^ NT -
DDE p,p' IM 746 637 85.4 0.10 - 11 0.060 ^ 1,250 AL 20 DEF (Tribufos) H 746 0.12 ^ 2 - Deltamethrin (includes parent Tralomethrin) I 746 0.15 ^ 20 50 Dichlorvos (DDVP) I 746 0.050 ^ 20 20

Dieldrin I 746 173 23.2 0.13 ^ 0.080 ^ 300 AL 6

Difenoconazole F 746 0.15 ^ 10 -

Dimethoate I 746 1 0.1 0.10 ^ 0.060 ^ 2 50 Diphenylamine (DPA) F 746 683 91.6 0.10 - 6.3 0.060 ^ 10 0.4

Endosulfan I I 746 0.060 ^ 500 4

Endosulfan II IM 746 0.020 ^ 500 4 

## APPENDIX F. DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDUES BY PESTICIDE IN MILK

Appendix F. Page 1 of 3Pesticide Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples w/

Detects Range of Values Detected, ppb Range of LODs, ppb EPA Tolerance Level, ppb* Codex MRL/EMRL, ppb*



### Endosulfan sulfate IM 746 115 15.4 0.050 - 3.0 0.030 ^ 500 4
Epoxiconazole F 746 0.21 ^ NT -

Esfenvalerate+Fenvalerate Total I 746 0.15 ^ 300 100

Etridiazole F 746 0.21 ^ 50 - Fenamiphos I 746 0.17 ^ 100 5 Fenamiphos sulfone IM 746 0.70 ^ 100 5 Fenamiphos sulfoxide IM 746 0.84 ^ 100 5

Fenarimol F 746 0.24 ^ NT - Fenoxaprop ethyl H 746 0.090 ^ 20 - Fenpropathrin I 746 0.36 ^ 80 100 Fipronil I 746 0.30 ^ 50 20

Fluridone H 746 0.30 ^ 50 - Fluroxypyr 1-methylheptyl ester H 746 0.24 ^ 300 -

Flutolanil F 746 0.12 ^ 50 50

Fluvalinate I 746 0.45 ^ NT - Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) FM 746 0.21 ^ NT -

Hexaconazole F 746 0.15 ^ NT - 3-Hydroxycarbofuran IM 746 45 6.0 0.083 - 0.66 0.050 ^ 20 -
Iprodione F 746 0.75 ^ 500 -

Malathion I 746 0.12 ^ 500 - Malathion oxygen analog IM 746 0.13 ^ NT - Metalaxyl F 746 0.090 ^ 20 - Methamidophos I 746 0.080 ^ 100 20

Metolachlor H 746 0.27 ^ 20 -

Metribuzin H 746 0.60 ^ 50 -

MGK-264 I 746 0.51 ^ 300 - Myclobutanil F 746 0.24 ^ 200 10

Norflurazon H 746 0.45 ^ 100 -

Omethoate IM 746 0.12 ^ 2 - Oxydemeton methyl I 746 0.32 ^ 10 - Oxyfluorfen H 746 0.090 ^ 50 - Pentachloroaniline (PCA) FM 746 0.27 ^ NT - Pentachlorobenzene (PCB) FM 746 0.30 ^ NT - Pentachlorophenyl methyl ether FM 746 0.090 ^ NT - Pentachlorophenyl methyl sulfide FM 746 0.12 ^ NT -

Appendix F. Page 2 of 3Pesticide Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples w/

Detects Range of Values Detected, ppb Range of LODs, ppb EPA Tolerance Level, ppb* Codex MRL/EMRL, ppb*



### Permethrin Total IM 746 21 2.8 1.0 - 4.1 0.60 ^ 250 100

Profenofos I 746 0.17 ^ 10 10

Pronamide H 746 0.15 ^ 20 - Propachlor H 746 0.18 ^ 20 - Propanil H 746 0.18 ^ 50 - Propargite I 746 0.75 ^ 80 100 Propham H 746 0.75 ^ NT - Propiconazole F 746 0.36 ^ 50 10 Pyrazon H 746 0.15 ^ 10 - Quintozene (PCNB) F 746 0.24 ^ NT -

Simazine H 746 0.18 ^ 20 -

Tefluthrin I 746 0.27 ^ NT -
Tetrachlorvinphos I 746 2 0.3 0.27 ^ 0.16 ^ 500 -

Tetraconazole F 746 0.33 ^ 50.0 -

Tetradifon I 746 0.080 ^ 400 AL -

Tetramethrin I 746 0.75 ^ NT -

Thiabendazole F 746 0.33 ^ 400 200

Triadimefon F 746 0.27 ^ 40 50

Triadimenol F 746 0.21 ^ 10 10

Triflumizole F 746 0.18 ^ 50 -

Vinclozolin F 746 0.15 ^ 50 50



### NOTES * = EPA Tolerances and Codex MRLs have been multiplied by a factor of 1000 as a basis for comparison

using a single scale. There is no intention to imply any more exactness in the value than that originally expressed by EPA and Codex. ^ = Only one distinct detected concentration or LOD value was reported for the pair. NT = No tolerance level was set for that pesticide/commodity pair. AL = Numbers shown are Action Levels established by FDA and Codex Extraneous Maximum Residue Levels (EMRLs)

for some pesticides. Under FQPA, responsibility for establishing tolerances in lieu of action levels has been transferred to EPA. In the interim, action levels are used.

Pesticide Types: F = Fungicide, FM = Fungicide Metabolite H = Herbicide I = Insecticide, IM = Insecticide Metabolite



## M

any of the listed tolerances and MRLs are the sum of a parent compound and metabolite(s)/isomer(s). The reader is advised to refer to EPA for the complete listing of compounds in tolerance expressions and to Codex for the complete listing of compounds in MRL expressions.

Appendix F. Page 3 of 3

# Appendix G

Distribution of Residues by Pesticide in Heavy Cream

Appendix G shows residue detections fo r all heavy cream compounds tested, including range of values detected, range of Limits of Detection (LODs), and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Codex Maximum Residue Limit/ Extraneous Maximum Residue Limit (MRL/EMRL) tolerance references for each pair.
In 2005, PDP analyzed 369 heavy cream sa mples. A total of 366 samples (99 percent) were reported with residue detections . All residue detections were much lower than the established tolerances.
See Appendix B for definition of ALs and MRLs.
MRLs/EMRLs shown in this appendix ar e from the Codex Alimentarius: Proc. of Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues , 38 th 

## Session, April 3-8, 2006, Fortaleza, Brazil. Only Codex MRLs (CXLs) are listed.
EPA tolerances as published in 40 CFR Part 180 are expressed in parts per million (ppm). Because heavy cream residues are expressed in parts per billion (ppb), EPA Tolerances and Codex MRLs have been multip lied by a factor of 1,000 as a basis for comparison using a single sc ale. There is no intention to imply any more exactness in the value than that origina lly expressed by EPA and Codex.
The information herein is only intended to be an initial reference. Readers are reminded that international regulations and MRLs may change and that it is important that information obtained from this table be verified with knowledgeable parties in the market of interest prior to sale or shipment of exports.Pesticide Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples w/

Detects Range of Values Detected, ppb Range of LODs, ppb EPA Tolerance Level, ppb* Codex MRL/EMRL, ppb*


### Acephate I 369 0.90 ^ 100 20
Alachlor H 369 1.5 ^ 20 -

Aldicarb I 369 0.60 ^ NT 10

Aldicarb sulfone IM 369 0.90 ^ NT 10

Aldicarb sulfoxide IM 369 1.8 ^ NT 10

Amitraz I 369 7.5 ^ 30 10

Atrazine H 369 1.8 ^ 20 -

Bifenthrin I 369 1 0.3 1.0 ^ 0.60 ^ 100 50 Buprofezin I 369 2.4 ^ 10 - Carbaryl I 369 2 0.5 0.80 - 3.6 0.50 ^ 300 50

Carbofuran I 369 0.90 ^ 20 50 Chlorfenapyr I 369 0.90 ^ 10 - Chlorpropham H 369 3.0 ^ 50 - Chlorpyrifos I 369 1.7 ^ 10 20 Chlorpyrifos methyl I 369 0.11 ^ 50 10 Chlorpyrifos methyl O-analog IM 369 14.8 ^ 50 - Coumaphos I 369 1.1 ^ 500 - Coumaphos oxygen analog IM 369 4.0 ^ 500 - Cyfluthrin I 369 1 0.3 10 ^ 6.0 ^ 1,000 10 Cyhalothrin, Total (Cyhalothrin-L + R157836 epimer) I 369 85 23.0 2.5 ^ 1.5 ^ 200 - Cypermethrin I 369 6.0 ^ 100 50
Cyproconazole F 369 2.1 ^ NT -
DDE p,p' IM 369 320 86.7 1.0 - 37 0.60 ^ 1,250 AL 20 DEF (Tribufos) H 369 1.2 ^ 2 - Deltamethrin (includes parent Tralomethrin) I 369 1.5 ^ 20 50 Dichlorvos (DDVP) I 369 0.50 ^ 20 20

Dieldrin I 369 122 33.1 1.3 ^ 0.80 ^ 300 AL 6

Difenoconazole F 369 1.5 ^ 10 -

Dimethoate I 369 0.60 ^ 2 50 Diphenylamine (DPA) F 369 305 82.7 1.0 - 6.2 0.60 ^ 10 0.4

Endosulfan I I 369 1 0.3 1.0 ^ 0.60 ^ 500 4

Endosulfan II IM 369 1 0.3 4.6 ^ 0.20 ^ 500 4

Endosulfan sulfate IM 369 56 15.2 0.50 - 192 0.30 ^ 500 4 

## APPENDIX G. DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDUES BY PESTICIDE IN HEAVY CREAM

Appendix G. Page 1 of 3Pesticide Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples w/

Detects Range of Values Detected, ppb Range of LODs, ppb EPA Tolerance Level, ppb* Codex MRL/EMRL, ppb* 

### Epoxiconazole F 369 2.1 ^ NT -

Esfenvalerate+Fenvalerate Total I 369 1.5 ^ 300 100

Etridiazole F 369 2.1 ^ 50 - Fenamiphos I 369 1.7 ^ 100 5 Fenamiphos sulfone IM 369 7.0 ^ 100 5 Fenamiphos sulfoxide IM 369 8.4 ^ 100 5

Fenarimol F 369 2.4 ^ NT - Fenoxaprop ethyl H 369 0.90 ^ 20 - Fenpropathrin I 369 3.6 ^ 80 100 Fipronil I 369 3.0 ^ 50 20

Fluridone H 369 3.0 ^ 50 - Fluroxypyr 1-methylheptyl ester H 369 2.4 ^ 300 -

Flutolanil F 369 1.2 ^ 50 50

Fluvalinate I 369 4.5 ^ NT - Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) FM 369 2.1 ^ NT -

Hexaconazole F 369 1.5 ^ NT - 3-Hydroxycarbofuran IM 369 0.50 ^ 20 -
Iprodione F 369 7.5 ^ 500 -

Malathion I 369 1.2 ^ 500 - Malathion oxygen analog IM 369 1.3 ^ NT - Metalaxyl F 369 0.90 ^ 20 - Methamidophos I 369 0.80 ^ 100 20

Metolachlor H 369 2.7 ^ 20 -

Metribuzin H 369 6.0 ^ 50 -

MGK-264 I 369 5.1 ^ 300 - Myclobutanil F 369 2.4 ^ 200 10

Norflurazon H 369 4.5 ^ 100 -

Omethoate IM 369 1.2 ^ 2 - Oxydemeton methyl I 369 3.2 ^ 10 - Oxyfluorfen H 369 0.90 ^ 50 - Pentachloroaniline (PCA) FM 369 2.7 ^ NT - Pentachlorobenzene (PCB) FM 369 3.0 ^ NT - Pentachlorophenyl methyl ether FM 369 0.90 ^ NT - Pentachlorophenyl methyl sulfide FM 369 1.2 ^ NT -

Permethrin Total IM 369 7 1.9 10 - 60.1 6.0 ^ 250 100

Appendix G. Page 2 of 3Pesticide Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples w/

Detects Range of Values Detected, ppb Range of LODs, ppb EPA Tolerance Level, ppb* Codex MRL/EMRL, ppb*



### Profenofos I 369 1.7 ^ 10 10

Pronamide H 369 1.5 ^ 20 - Propachlor H 369 1.8 ^ 20 - Propanil H 369 1.8 ^ 50 - Propargite I 369 7.5 ^ 80 100 Propham H 369 7.5 ^ NT - Propiconazole F 369 3.6 ^ 50 10 Pyrazon H 369 1.5 ^ 10 - Quintozene (PCNB) F 369 2.4 ^ NT -

Simazine H 369 1.8 ^ 20 -

Tefluthrin I 369 2.7 ^ NT -
Tetrachlorvinphos I 369 1.6 ^ 500 -

Tetraconazole F 369 3.3 ^ 50.0 -

Tetradifon I 369 0.80 ^ 400 AL -

Tetramethrin I 369 7.5 ^ NT -

Thiabendazole F 369 3.3 ^ 400 200

Triadimefon F 369 2.7 ^ 40 50

Triadimenol F 369 2.1 ^ 10 10

Triflumizole F 369 1.8 ^ 50 -

Vinclozolin F 369 1.5 ^ 50 50



### NOTES * = EPA Tolerances and Codex MRLs have been multiplied by a factor of 1000 as a basis for comparison

using a single scale. There is no intention to imply any more exactness in the value than that originally expressed by EPA and Codex. ^ = Only one distinct detected concentration or LOD value was reported for the pair. NT = No tolerance level was set for that pesticide/commodity pair. AL = Numbers shown are Action Levels established by FDA and Codex Extraneous Maximum Residue Levels (EMRLs)

for some pesticides. Under FQPA, responsibility for establishing tolerances in lieu of action levels has been transferred to EPA. In the interim, action levels are used.

Pesticide Types: F = Fungicide, FM = Fungicide Metabolite H = Herbicide I = Insecticide, IM = Insecticide Metabolite



## M

any of the listed tolerances and MRLs are the sum of a parent compound and metabolite(s)/isomer(s). The reader is advised to refer to EPA for the complete listing of compounds in tolerance expressions and to Codex for the complete listing of compounds in MRL expressions.

Appendix G. Page 3 of 3

# Appendix H

Distribution of Residues by Pesticide in Pork

Appendix F shows residue detections for all pork compounds tested, including range of values detected, range of Limits of Detection (LODs), and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Codex Maxi mum Residue Limit/Extraneous Maximum Residue Limit (MRL/EMRL) toleranc e references for each pair.
In 2005, PDP analyzed pork tissue samples which included 352 adipose samples and 352 muscle samples. A total of 40 adipose samples (11 percent) and 18 muscle samples (5 percent) were reported with residue detections. Two of the adipose samples contained residues that exceeded the established EPA tolerance.
See Appendix B for definition of ALs and MRLs.
MRLs/EMRLs shown in this appendix ar e from the Code x Alimentarius: Proc. of Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues , 38 th 

## Session, April 3-8, 2006, Fortaleza, Brazil. Only Codex MRLs (CXLs) are listed.
EPA tolerances as published in 40 CFR Pa rt 180 are expressed in parts per million (ppm). Because pork residues are ex pressed in parts perbillion (ppb), EPA Tolerances and Codex MRLs have been multipli ed by a factor of 1,000 as a basis for comparison using a single scale. There is no intention to imply anymore exactness in the value than that originally expressed by EPA and Codex.
The information herein is only intended to be an initial reference. Readers are reminded that international r egulations and MRLs may change an d that it is important that information obtained from this table be verified with knowledgeable parties in the market of interest prior to sale or shipment of exports.Pesticide / Commodity Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples w/

Detects Range of Values Detected, ppb Range of LODs, ppb EPA Tolerance Level, ppb* Codex MRL/EMRL, ppb*


### Acephate I Pork, Adipose 352 1.2 ^ 100 - Pork, Muscle 352 0.60 ^ 100 50
Acetamiprid I Pork, Adipose 352 9.0 ^ 100 - Pork, Muscle 352 6.9 ^ 100 -

Alachlor H Pork, Adipose 352 3.6 ^ 20 - Pork, Muscle 352 1.5 ^ 20 -

Aldicarb I Pork, Adipose 352 0.42 ^ NT - Pork, Muscle 352 0.21 ^ NT 10

Aldicarb sulfone IM Pork, Adipose 352 2.4 ^ NT - Pork, Muscle 352 1.2 ^ NT 10

Aldicarb sulfoxide IM Pork, Adipose 352 13.5 ^ NT - Pork, Muscle 352 6.8 ^ NT 10

Aldrin I Pork, Adipose 352 7.5 ^ 300 AL 200

Atrazine H Pork, Adipose 352 0.60 ^ NT - Pork, Muscle 352 0.30 ^ NT -
Azoxystrobin F Pork, Adipose 352 3.0 ^ 10.0 - Pork, Muscle 352 3.0 ^ 10 -

Benoxacor S Pork, Adipose 352 0.60 ^ 10 - Pork, Muscle 352 0.30 ^ 10 -
BHC alpha I Pork, Adipose 352 1.2 ^ 300 AL -

Bifenazate A Pork, Adipose 352 6.0 ^ NT 100 Pork, Muscle 352 2.4 ^ 20 -

Bifenthrin I Pork, Adipose 352 1.5 ^ 1,000 - Pork, Muscle 352 0.90 ^ 500 -

Boscalid F Pork, Adipose 352 0.90 ^ 100 - Pork, Muscle 352 0.30 ^ 50 - 

## APPENDIX H. DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDUES BY PESTICIDE IN PORK

Appendix H. Page 1 of 10Pesticide / Commodity Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples w/

Detects Range of Values Detected, ppb Range of LODs, ppb EPA Tolerance Level, ppb* Codex MRL/EMRL, ppb*


### Buprofezin I Pork, Adipose 352 6.0 ^ 50 - Pork, Muscle 352 1.8 ^ 50 -
Captan F Pork, Adipose 352 18 ^ 50 - Pork, Muscle 352 30 ^ 50 -
Carbaryl I Pork, Adipose 352 7 2.0 1.0 - 98.6 0.60 ^ 100 - Pork, Muscle 352 10 2.8 0.50 - 6.6 0.30 ^ 100 50
Carbendazim (MBC) F Pork, Adipose 352 0.60 ^ 100 - Pork, Muscle 352 0.30 ^ 100 -

Carbofuran I Pork, Adipose 352 0.30 ^ NT 50 Pork, Muscle 352 0.15 ^ NT 50

Carboxin F Pork, Adipose 352 7.5 ^ 100 - Pork, Muscle 352 1.5 ^ 100 -

Chlordane cis I Pork, Adipose 352 0.90 ^ 300 AL 50

Chlordane trans I Pork, Adipose 352 0.90 ^ 300 AL 50

Chloroneb F Pork, Adipose 352 3.6 ^ 200 - Pork, Muscle 352 1.8 ^ 200 -

Chlorothalonil F Pork, Adipose 352 1 0.3 7.5 ^ 4.5 ^ 100 - Pork, Muscle 352 1.5 ^ 30 -
Chlorpropham H Pork, Adipose 352 1.2 ^ 500 - Pork, Muscle 352 0.60 ^ 500 -
Chlorpyrifos I Pork, Adipose 352 1 0.3 2.5 ^ 1.5 ^ 200 20 Pork, Muscle 352 0.75 ^ 50 -
Chlorpyrifos methyl I Pork, Adipose 352 0.90 ^ 500 - Pork, Muscle 352 0.45 ^ 500 -

Clethodim H Pork, Muscle 352 1.4 ^ 200 200

Clofentezine I Pork, Adipose 352 0.90 ^ 50 - Pork, Muscle 352 0.45 ^ 50 -

Appendix H. Page 2 of 10Pesticide / Commodity Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples w/

Detects Range of Values Detected, ppb Range of LODs, ppb EPA Tolerance Level, ppb* Codex MRL/EMRL, ppb* 

### Coumaphos I Pork, Adipose 352 1.2 ^ 1,000 - Pork, Muscle 352 0.60 ^ 1,000 -
Coumaphos oxygen analog IM Pork, Adipose 352 4.2 ^ 1,000 - Pork, Muscle 352 2.1 ^ 1,000 -
Cyfluthrin I Pork, Adipose 352 4.8 ^ 10,000 - Pork, Muscle 352 2.4 ^ 400 -
Cyhalothrin, Lambda I Pork, Adipose 352 2.4 ^ 3,000 - Pork, Muscle 352 0.90 ^ 200 -
Cypermethrin I Pork, Adipose 352 6.0 ^ 1,000 200 Pork, Muscle 352 3.0 ^ 200 -
DDD p,p' IM Pork, Adipose 352 1.2 ^ 5,000 AL 5,000
DDE p,p' IM Pork, Adipose 352 25 7.1 1.5 - 3.8 0.90 ^ 5,000 AL 5,000
DDT p,p' I Pork, Adipose 352 3.0 ^ 5,000 AL 5,000 Deltamethrin (includes parent Tralomethrin) I Pork, Adipose 352 9.0 ^ 50 500 Pork, Muscle 352 4.5 ^ 50 -
Dichlorvos (DDVP) I Pork, Adipose 352 0.90 ^ 100 - Pork, Muscle 352 0.45 ^ 100 50

Dieldrin I Pork, Adipose 352 3.0 ^ 300 AL 200

Difenoconazole F Pork, Adipose 352 4.8 ^ 50 - Pork, Muscle 352 2.4 ^ 50 -

Diflubenzuron I Pork, Adipose 352 0.60 ^ 50 100 Pork, Muscle 352 0.30 ^ 50 -
Diflufenzopyr H Pork, Adipose 352 1 0.3 57 ^ 3.0 ^ 300 -

Dimethoate I Pork, Adipose 352 0.90 ^ NT 50 Pork, Muscle 352 0.45 ^ NT 50

Appendix H. Page 3 of 10Pesticide / Commodity Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples w/

Detects Range of Values Detected, ppb Range of LODs, ppb EPA Tolerance Level, ppb* Codex MRL/EMRL, ppb*


### Diphenamid H Pork, Adipose 352 1.2 ^ NT - Pork, Muscle 352 0.60 ^ NT -
2,6-DIPN P Pork, Muscle 352 0.60 ^ 1,350 -

Endosulfan I I Pork, Adipose 352 10.5 ^ 200 100 Pork, Muscle 352 4.5 ^ 200 -

Endosulfan II IM Pork, Adipose 352 15 ^ 200 100 Pork, Muscle 352 4.5 ^ 200 -

Endosulfan sulfate IM Pork, Adipose 352 3.6 ^ 200 100 Pork, Muscle 352 1.5 ^ 200 -

Esfenvalerate+Fenvalerate Total I Pork, Adipose 352 3.0 ^ 1,500 1,000 Pork, Muscle 352 1.5 ^ 1,500 -

Ethalfluralin H Pork, Adipose 352 0.90 ^ NT - Pork, Muscle 352 0.60 ^ NT -

Ethion I Pork, Adipose 352 1.2 ^ 200 - Pork, Muscle 352 0.60 ^ 200 -

Ethofumesate H Pork, Adipose 352 9.0 ^ 50 - Pork, Muscle 352 0.90 ^ 50 -

Etridiazole F Pork, Adipose 352 1.5 ^ 100.0 - Pork, Muscle 352 0.90 ^ 100.0 -
Fenamiphos I Pork, Adipose 352 1.8 ^ 50 - Pork, Muscle 352 0.90 ^ 50 10
Fenamiphos sulfone IM Pork, Adipose 352 6.0 ^ 50 - Pork, Muscle 352 3.0 ^ 50 10
Fenamiphos sulfoxide IM Pork, Adipose 352 6.0 ^ 50 -

Fenarimol F Pork, Adipose 352 1.2 ^ NT - Pork, Muscle 352 0.90 ^ NT -

Fenbuconazole F Pork, Adipose 352 1.8 ^ 10 - Pork, Muscle 352 1.2 ^ 10 -

Appendix H. Page 4 of 10Pesticide / Commodity Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples w/

Detects Range of Values Detected, ppb Range of LODs, ppb EPA Tolerance Level, ppb* Codex MRL/EMRL, ppb*


### Fenoxaprop ethyl H Pork, Adipose 352 1.2 ^ 50 - Pork, Muscle 352 0.90 ^ 50 -
Fenpropathrin I Pork, Adipose 352 3.0 ^ 1,000 - Pork, Muscle 352 0.90 ^ 100 -

Fenthion I Pork, Adipose 352 2.4 ^ NT - Pork, Muscle 352 1.2 ^ NT -

Fenthion sulfone IM Pork, Adipose 352 6.0 ^ NT - Pork, Muscle 352 3.0 ^ NT -
Fipronil I Pork, Adipose 352 2.1 ^ 40 - Pork, Muscle 352 0.60 ^ 10 -

Flufenacet H Pork, Adipose 352 15 ^ 50 - Pork, Muscle 352 4.5 ^ 50 -

Fluridone H Pork, Adipose 352 0.90 ^ 50 - Pork, Muscle 352 0.90 ^ 50 -
Fluroxypyr 1-methylheptyl ester H Pork, Adipose 352 3.6 ^ 100 - Pork, Muscle 352 0.90 ^ 100 -

Flutolanil F Pork, Adipose 352 4.5 ^ 100 - Pork, Muscle 352 0.30 ^ 50 50

Fluvalinate I Pork, Adipose 352 3.0 ^ NT - Pork, Muscle 352 1.5 ^ NT -
Heptachlor I Pork, Adipose 352 0.90 ^ 200 AL 200
Heptachlor epoxide IM Pork, Adipose 352 6.0 ^ 200 AL 200

Hexazinone H Pork, Adipose 352 6.0 ^ 100 - Pork, Muscle 352 2.4 ^ 100 -
Hexythiazox I Pork, Adipose 352 10.5 ^ 20 -
Hydroprene R Pork, Adipose 352 4.5 ^ 200 - Pork, Muscle 352 1.5 ^ 200 -

Appendix H. Page 5 of 10Pesticide / Commodity Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples w/

Detects Range of Values Detected, ppb Range of LODs, ppb EPA Tolerance Level, ppb* Codex MRL/EMRL, ppb*


### 3-Hydroxycarbofuran IM Pork, Adipose 352 1.2 ^ NT - Pork, Muscle 352 0.60 ^ NT -

Imazalil F Pork, Adipose 352 3.0 ^ 10 - Pork, Muscle 352 1.5 ^ 10 -
Imidacloprid I Pork, Adipose 352 3.0 ^ 300 - Pork, Muscle 352 1.5 ^ 300 20

Indoxacarb I Pork, Adipose 352 0.30 ^ 1,500 - Pork, Muscle 352 0.15 ^ 100 -
Iprodione F Pork, Adipose 352 5.4 ^ 500 - Pork, Muscle 352 5.4 ^ 500 -
Isofenphos I Pork, Adipose 352 2.4 ^ NT - Pork, Muscle 352 1.2 ^ NT -

Isoxaflutole H Pork, Adipose 352 4.5 ^ 200 - Pork, Muscle 352 1.8 ^ 200 -
Lindane (BHC gamma) I Pork, Adipose 352 1.8 ^ 4,000 100

Linuron H Pork, Adipose 352 1.5 ^ 1,000 - Pork, Muscle 352 0.75 ^ 1,000 -

Malathion I Pork, Adipose 352 1.2 ^ 4,000 - Pork, Muscle 352 0.60 ^ 4,000 -
Malathion oxygen analog IM Pork, Adipose 352 1.8 ^ NT - Pork, Muscle 352 0.90 ^ NT -
Metalaxyl F Pork, Adipose 352 2.7 ^ 400 - Pork, Muscle 352 1.2 ^ 50 -
Methamidophos I Pork, Adipose 352 1.2 ^ 100 - Pork, Muscle 352 0.60 ^ 100 10

Methidathion I Pork, Adipose 352 1.8 ^ NT - Pork, Muscle 352 0.90 ^ NT -
Methoprene R Pork, Adipose 352 10.5 ^ 1,000 200 Pork, Muscle 352 5.4 ^ 100 -

Appendix H. Page 6 of 10Pesticide / Commodity Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples w/

Detects Range of Values Detected, ppb Range of LODs, ppb EPA Tolerance Level, ppb* Codex MRL/EMRL, ppb*


### Methoxychlor p,p' IM Pork, Adipose 352 1.5 ^ NT -
Methoxyfenozide I Pork, Adipose 352 0.30 ^ 100 50 Pork, Muscle 352 0.15 ^ 20 -

Metolachlor H Pork, Adipose 352 10.5 ^ NT - Pork, Muscle 352 0.90 ^ NT -

Metribuzin H Pork, Adipose 352 12 ^ 700 - Pork, Muscle 352 4.5 ^ 700 -

MGK-264 I Pork, Adipose 352 6 1.7 10 - 63.9 6.0 ^ 300 - MGK-326 (dipropyl isocinchomeronate) I Pork, Adipose 352 1.8 ^ 100 - Pork, Muscle 352 0.90 ^ 100 -

Mirex I Pork, Muscle 352 0.90 ^ 100 AL -
Myclobutanil F Pork, Muscle 352 1.8 ^ 100 -
1-Naphthol IM Pork, Adipose (X-1) 352 3 0.9 5.0 - 188 3.0 ^ 100 - Pork, Muscle 352 1 0.3 2.5 ^ 1.5 ^ 100 -
Nitrapyrin N Pork, Adipose 352 1.5 ^ 50 - Pork, Muscle 352 0.90 ^ 50 -

Norflurazon H Pork, Adipose 352 0.60 ^ 100 - Pork, Muscle 352 0.30 ^ 100 -

Omethoate IM Pork, Adipose 352 1.5 ^ NT - Pork, Muscle 352 0.75 ^ NT -

Oxadiazon H Pork, Adipose 352 1.5 ^ NT - Pork, Muscle 352 0.60 ^ NT -
Oxydemeton methyl I Pork, Adipose 352 6.0 ^ 10 -
Oxydemeton methyl sulfone IM Pork, Adipose 352 15 ^ 10 - Pork, Muscle 352 7.5 ^ 10 -

Appendix H. Page 7 of 10Pesticide / Commodity Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples w/

Detects Range of Values Detected, ppb Range of LODs, ppb EPA Tolerance Level, ppb* Codex MRL/EMRL, ppb*


### Oxyfluorfen H Pork, Adipose 352 0.90 ^ 50 - Pork, Muscle 352 0.60 ^ 50 -
Oxythioquinox I Pork, Muscle 352 1.8 ^ NT -

Permethrin Total IM Pork, Adipose 352 3.0 ^ 3,000 1,000 Pork, Muscle 352 3.0 ^ 250 -

Phorate I Pork, Adipose 352 1.2 ^ NT - Pork, Muscle 352 0.60 ^ NT 50

Phosalone I Pork, Adipose 352 1.2 ^ NT - Pork, Muscle 352 0.60 ^ NT -

Phosmet I Pork, Adipose 352 3.0 ^ 200 - Pork, Muscle 352 1.5 ^ 200 -
Piperonyl butoxide I Pork, Adipose (X-1) 352 6 1.7 10 - 179 6.0 ^ 100 2,000 Pork, Muscle 352 9 2.6 7.5 - 53.5 4.5 ^ 100 -
Pirimiphos methyl I Pork, Adipose 352 0.90 ^ 200 - Pork, Muscle 352 0.45 ^ NT 10

Prallethrin I Pork, Adipose 352 9.0 ^ 1,000 - Pork, Muscle 352 5.4 ^ 1,000 -

Profenofos I Pork, Adipose 352 1.8 ^ NT - Pork, Muscle 352 0.90 ^ NT 50

Pronamide H Pork, Adipose 352 0.90 ^ 20 - Pork, Muscle 352 0.30 ^ 20 -
Propachlor H Pork, Adipose 352 7.5 ^ 20 -
Propachlor oxanilic acid HM Pork, Muscle 352 3.6 ^ 20 -
Propanil H Pork, Adipose 352 3.6 ^ 100 - Pork, Muscle 352 1.2 ^ 100 -
Propargite I Pork, Adipose 352 7.2 ^ 100 100 Pork, Muscle 352 3.6 ^ 100 -

Appendix H. Page 8 of 10Pesticide / Commodity Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples w/

Detects Range of Values Detected, ppb Range of LODs, ppb EPA Tolerance Level, ppb* Codex MRL/EMRL, ppb*


### Propetamphos I Pork, Adipose 352 1.2 ^ 100 - Pork, Muscle 352 0.60 ^ 100 -
Propham H Pork, Adipose 352 10.5 ^ NT -
Propiconazole F Pork, Adipose 352 3.0 ^ 100 - Pork, Muscle 352 1.5 ^ 100 50
Pyrethrins I Pork, Adipose 352 90 ^ 100 - Pork, Muscle 352 45 ^ 100 -
Pyridaben I Pork, Adipose 352 1.8 ^ 50 - Pork, Muscle 352 1.8 ^ 50 -
Pyriproxyfen I Pork, Adipose 352 3.6 ^ 100 - Pork, Muscle 352 1.2 ^ 100 -

Resmethrin I Pork, Adipose 352 9.0 ^ 3,000 - Pork, Muscle 352 1.5 ^ 3,000 -
Sethoxydim H Pork, Muscle 352 0.30 ^ 200 -

Simazine H Pork, Adipose 352 3.9 ^ 20 - Pork, Muscle 352 2.0 ^ 20 -
Sulprofos H Pork, Adipose 352 1.8 ^ NT - Pork, Muscle 352 0.90 ^ NT -

Tebufenozide I Pork, Adipose 352 0.30 ^ 100 50 Pork, Muscle 352 0.15 ^ 80 -

Terbacil H Pork, Adipose 352 2.1 ^ NT - Pork, Muscle 352 1.5 ^ NT -
Tetrachlorvinphos I Pork, Adipose 352 2.4 ^ 1,500 -
Tetrahydrophthalimide (THPI) FM Pork, Adipose 352 12 ^ 50 - Pork, Muscle 352 6.0 ^ 50 -

Thiabendazole F Pork, Adipose 352 45 ^ 100 - Pork, Muscle 352 3.0 ^ 100 -

Appendix H. Page 9 of 10Pesticide / Commodity Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples w/

Detects Range of Values Detected, ppb Range of LODs, ppb EPA Tolerance Level, ppb* Codex MRL/EMRL, ppb*



### Thiamethoxam I Pork, Muscle 352 1.2 ^ 20 -

Thiobencarb H Pork, Adipose 352 6.0 ^ 200 - Pork, Muscle 352 0.60 ^ 200 -

Triadimefon F Pork, Adipose 352 3.0 ^ 40 - Pork, Muscle 352 1.5 ^ 40 50

Triadimenol F Pork, Adipose 352 3.6 ^ 100 - Pork, Muscle 352 2.4 ^ 100 50
Trifloxystrobin F Pork, Adipose 352 6.0 ^ 50 50 Pork, Muscle 352 0.90 ^ 50 -

Triflumizole F Pork, Adipose 352 2.1 ^ 500 - Pork, Muscle 352 0.90 ^ 50 -

Vinclozolin F Pork, Adipose 352 1.2 ^ 50 - Pork, Muscle 352 0.30 ^ 50 -



### NOTES * = EPA Tolerances and Codex MRLs have been multiplied by a factor of 1000 as a basis for comparison using a single scale.

There is no intention to imply any more exactness in the value than that originally expressed by EPA and Codex. ^ = Only one distinct detected concentration or LOD value was reported for the pair. NT = No tolerance level was set for that pesticide/commodity pair. AL = Numbers shown are Action Levels established by FDA and Codex Extraneous Maximum Residue Levels (EMRLs) for some

pesticides. Under FQPA, responsibility for establishing tolerances in lieu of action levels has been transferred to EPA. In the interim, action levels are used. (X) = Residue was found which exceeds EPA tolerance. Following "X" are the number of occurrences.

Pesticide Types: A = Acaricide N = Nitrification Inhibitor F = Fungicide, FM = Fungicide Metabolite P = Plant Growth Regulator H = Herbicide, HM = Herbicide Metabolite R = Insect Growth Regulator I = Insecticide, IM = Insecticide Metabolite S = Herbicide Safener



## M

any of the listed tolerances and MRLs are the sum of a parent compound and metabolite(s)/isomer(s). The reader is advised to refer to EPA for the complete listing of compounds in tolerance expressions and to Codex for the complete listing of compounds in MRL expressions.

Appendix H. Page 10 of 10

# Appendix I

Distribution of Residues by Pesticide in Bottled Water

Appendix I shows residue detections for all bottled water compounds tested, including range of values detected and range of Limits of Detection (LODs) for each pair.
In 2005, PDP analyzed 378 bottled water samples. A total of 59 samples (16%) were reported with residue detection s. Fourteen different resi dues from seven different pesticides were detected. Mo st samples with detections were for a single residue with only a few samples having multiple residues (up to a maximum ofseven). Bottled water is regulated by the FDA and State regulatory agencies for the same list of pesticides currently regulated in public drin king water by EPA. The Safe Drinking Water Act amendments of 1996 require that FD A consider applicability of all EPA MCLs and monitoring for bottled water. All det ections were well below any established EPA MCLs, which are being adopted by FDA as SOQs and HAs.Pesticide Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples w/

Detects Range of Values Detected, ppt Range of LODs, ppt



### 2,4 DB H 211 4.0 ^
2,4-D H 211 2.5 ^

Acetochlor H 378 1 0.3 17 ^ 10 ^

Acetochlor ethanesulfonic acid HM 211 9.0 ^

Acetochlor oxanilic acid HM 211 1 0.5 17.3 ^ 10 ^

Alachlor H 378 10 ^

Alachlor ethanesulfonic acid HM 211 9 4.3 13.7 - 121 12.5 ^

Alachlor oxanilic acid HM 211 1 0.5 17.3 ^ 10 ^

Atrazine H 378 10 2.6 17 - 50 10 ^ Bensulfuron methyl H 211 5.0 ^

Boscalid F 378 100 ^

Bromacil H 211 6.0 ^ Carbaryl I 211 7.5 ^

Carbofuran I 211 4.0 ^ Chlorimuron ethyl H 211 6.0 ^

Chlorothalonil F 378 30 ^ Chlorpyrifos I 378 30 ^

Clomazone H 378 30 ^ Clopyralid H 211 12.5 ^ Cyanazine H 378 50 ^

DCPA H 378 30 ^ Desethyl Atrazine HM 378 26 6.9 17 - 80 10 ^ Desethyl-desisopropyl Atrazine HM 211 4 1.9 50.5 - 69 15 ^ Desisopropyl atrazine HM 378 3 0.8 83 ^ 50 ^

Diazinon I 378 30 ^
Dimethenamid ESA HM 211 2.0 ^

Dimethenamid oxanilic acid HM 211 3.0 ^
Dimethenamid/Dimethenamid P H 378 10 ^

Dimethoate I 378 50 ^

Disulfoton sulfone IM 211 6.0 ^

Diuron H 211 4.0 ^
EPTC H 378 30 ^

Ethalfluralin H 378 30 ^

Flufenacet H 211 2.5 ^ 

## APPENDIX I. DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDUES BY PESTICIDE IN BOTTLED WATER

Appendix I. Page 1 of 3Pesticide Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples w/

Detects Range of Values Detected, ppt Range of LODs, ppt


### Fonofos I 378 30 ^

Halosulfuron H 211 9.0 ^ Hydroxy Atrazine HM 211 22 10.4 3.0 - 92.7 2.0 ^

Imazamethabenz acid H 211 3.0 ^ Imazamethabenz methyl H 211 1.5 ^

Imazamox H 211 4.0 ^ Imazapic H 211 3.0 ^ Imazapyr H 211 2.5 ^ Imazaquin H 211 5.0 ^ Imazethapyr H 211 2 0.9 3.0 ^ 2.0 ^

Linuron H 211 6.0 ^

Malathion I 378 30 ^
MCPA H 211 1.5 ^

MCPB H 211 3.0 ^ Metalaxyl F 211 2.5 ^

Metolachlor H 378 15 ^

Metolachlor ethanesulfonic acid HM 211 18 8.5 5.0 - 180 3.0 ^

Metolachlor oxanilic acid HM 211 6 2.8 6.1 - 22.6 3.0 ^

Metribuzin H 378 30 ^ Metsulfuron methyl H 211 7.0 ^ Myclobutanil F 378 50 ^

Neburon H 211 3.0 ^

Nicosulfuron H 211 8.0 ^ Parathion methyl I 378 30 ^

Pendimethalin H 378 30 ^

Phorate I 378 30 ^

Picloram H 211 1 0.5 52.8 ^ 12.5 ^

Prometon H 378 30 ^ Prometryn H 211 1.0 ^ Propachlor H 378 30 ^ Propachlor oxanilic acid HM 211 3.0 ^ Propanil H 378 30 ^ Propazine H 378 30 ^ Propiconazole F 378 50 ^ Propoxur I 211 3.0 ^
Siduron H 211 2.0 ^

Appendix I. Page 2 of 3Pesticide Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detections % of Samples w/

Detects Range of Values Detected, ppt Range of LODs, ppt


### Simazine H 378 30 ^ Sulfometuron methyl H 211 2.5 ^

Tebuconazole F 378 50 ^ Tebupirimfos I 378 30 ^

Tebuthiuron H 378 30 ^

Terbufos I 378 30 ^

Tetraconazole F 378 1 0.3 100 ^ 30 ^

Thifensulfuron H 211 5.0 ^

Thiobencarb H 211 2.5 ^

Tri Allate H 378 30 ^

Triasulfuron H 211 7.0 ^

Trifluralin H 378 30 ^



### NOTES ^ = Only one distinct detected concentration or LOD value was reported for the pair.

Pesticide Types: F = Fungicide H = Herbicide, HM = Herbicide Metabolite I = Insecticide, IM = Insecticide Metabolite

Appendix I. Page 3 of 3

# Appendix J

Distribution of Residues by Pesticide in Drinking Water

Appendix J shows residue detections for all drinking water compounds tested, including range of values detected and range of Limits of Detection (LODs). The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Nati onal Primary Drinking Water Regulation (NPDWR) Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) for drinking water, Health Advisory (HA) values for drinking water, and Freshwat er Aquatic Organism (FAOs) Criteria for ambient water are also shown. Units for LODs, MCLs, HAs, and FAOs are shown in parts per trillion (ppt).
In 2005, PDP analyzed 750 drinking water sa mples. PDP detected 43 different pesticide residues in finished drinking wate r and 48 residues in the untreated intake water; most of the detections were herbi cides. None of the finished drinking water samples exceeded EPA MCLs for any pestici de detected. In fact, the majority of pesticides included in the PD P screens were not detected.
The MCLs are legally enfor ceable standards that apply to public water systems. EPA’s regulations for MCLs may be refe renced at http://www.epa.gov/safewater/ mcl.html . The HAs are an estimate of acceptabl e drinking water levels for a chemical substance based on health effects information. The values published are for lifetime HA, which is the concentration of a chemical in drinking water that is not expected to cause any adverse noncarcinogenic effects fo r a lifetime of exposure. The HA values can be referenced at http://www.epa. gov/waterscience/criteria/drinking . FAO criteria are set by EPA and are the concentration of a chemical in water at or below which aquatic life are protected from acute and chronic adverse effe cts of the chemical. The FAO values can be referenced at http ://www.epa.gov/water science/criteria/ wqcriteria.html . Health Advisories and FAO criteria are not legally enforceable Federal standards, but serve as technical guidance to a ssist Federal, State, and local officials.
EPA MCL, HA, and FAO values are expre ssed in parts per million (ppm). Because drinking water residues are expre ssed in parts per trillion (ppt), EPA MCL, HA, and FAO values have been multiplied by a factor of 1,000,000 as a basis for comparison using a single scale . There is no intention to imply any more exactness in the value than that originally expressed by EPA.Pesticide / Commodity Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detects % of Samples

with Detects Range of Values Detected, ppt Range of LODs, ppt EPA MCL, ppt 1 EPA HA 2

, ppt 1 EPA FAO 3

, ppt 1



### 2 4 5 T H Water, Finished 230 1.8 - 22 50,000 Water, Untreated 231 1.8 - 22
2,4 DB H Water, Finished 374 14 - 151 Water, Untreated 375 14 - 151
2,4-D H Water, Finished 374 220 58.8 1.1 - 430 0.65 - 90 70,000 70,000 Water, Untreated 375 234 62.4 1.1 - 1200 0.65 - 90

Acetochlor H Water, Finished 374 9 2.4 15.3 - 314 9.2 - 49.5 Water, Untreated 376 27 7.2 15.3 - 669 9.2 - 49.5

Acetochlor ethanesulfonic acid HM Water, Finished 374 150 40.1 2.7 - 1200 1.6 - 45 Water, Untreated 376 151 40.2 7.2 - 1900 1.6 - 45

Acetochlor oxanilic acid HM Water, Finished 374 144 38.5 1.1 - 1300 0.68 - 45 Water, Untreated 376 147 39.1 1.1 - 1900 0.68 - 45

Acifluorfen H Water, Finished 111 79 ^ Water, Untreated 113 79 ^

Alachlor H Water, Finished 374 7.8 - 45 2000 Water, Untreated 376 7.8 - 45

Alachlor ethanesulfonic acid HM Water, Finished 374 188 50.3 2.8 - 244 1.7 - 45 Water, Untreated 376 193 51.3 2.8 - 281 1.7 - 45

Alachlor oxanilic acid HM Water, Finished 374 142 38.0 1.0 - 61 0.61 - 45 Water, Untreated 376 150 39.9 1.0 - 84 0.61 - 45

Aldicarb I Water, Finished 111 1500 ^ Water, Untreated 113 1500 ^

Aldicarb sulfone IM Water, Finished 111 200 ^ Water, Untreated 113 200 ^

Aldicarb sulfoxide IM Water, Finished 111 5.0 ^ Water, Untreated 113 5.0 ^

Aldrin I Water, Finished 255 5.0 - 9.6 Water, Untreated 257 5.0 - 9.6 3000 

## APPENDIX J. DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDUES BY PESTICIDE IN DRINKING WATER

Appendix J. Page 1 of 16Pesticide / Commodity Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detects % of Samples

with Detects Range of Values Detected, ppt Range of LODs, ppt EPA MCL, ppt 1 EPA HA 2

, ppt 1 EPA FAO 3

, ppt 1



### Atrazine H Water, Finished 374 279 74.6 1.1 - 1500 0.66 - 5.0 3000 Water, Untreated 376 284 75.5 1.1 - 3500 0.66 - 5.0 Azinphos methyl I Water, Finished 119 12 ^ Water, Untreated 119 12 ^
Benfluralin H Water, Finished 230 2.0 - 20 Water, Untreated 232 2.0 - 20 Bensulfuron methyl H Water, Finished 369 1.2 - 53 Water, Untreated 370 1.2 - 53

Bentazon H Water, Finished 374 167 44.7 0.30 - 31 0.18 - 206 200,000 Water, Untreated 375 180 48.0 0.30 - 194 0.18 - 206 BHC alpha I Water, Finished 44 20 ^ Water, Untreated 44 20 ^
Bifenthrin I Water, Finished 255 3.2 - 5.0 Water, Untreated 257 3.2 - 5.0
Bromacil H Water, Finished 263 2.5 - 9.6 90,000 Water, Untreated 262 32 12.2 4.2 - 77 2.5 - 9.6 Bromoxynil H Water, Finished 195 6.0 - 39 Water, Untreated 197 1 0.5 65 ^ 6.0 - 39

Butachlor H Water, Finished 263 1.9 - 5.3 Water, Untreated 263 1.9 - 5.3 Butylate H Water, Finished 255 1.8 - 10 400,000 Water, Untreated 257 1.8 - 10 Carbaryl I Water, Finished 374 1 0.3 19 ^ 4.7 - 23 700,000 Water, Untreated 375 3 0.8 7.8 - 17 4.7 - 23 Carbendazim (MBC) F Water, Finished 230 1.8 - 15 Water, Untreated 231 1.8 - 15

Carbofuran I Water, Finished 374 0.60 - 17 40,000 40,000 Water, Untreated 375 0.60 - 17 Carbophenothion I Water, Finished 230 5.3 - 11 Water, Untreated 232 5.3 - 11

Appendix J. Page 2 of 16Pesticide / Commodity Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detects % of Samples

with Detects Range of Values Detected, ppt Range of LODs, ppt EPA MCL, ppt 1 EPA HA 2

, ppt 1 EPA FAO 3

, ppt 1



### Chloramben H Water, Finished 119 60 ^ 100,000 Water, Untreated 118 60 ^
Chlordane cis I Water, Finished 225 2.3 - 5.0 2000 4 

### Water, Untreated 227 2.3 - 5.0 2400
Chlordane trans I Water, Finished 230 2.3 - 5.0 2000 4 

### Water, Untreated 232 2.3 - 5.0 2400 Chlorfenvinphos total I Water, Finished 374 7.5 - 24 Water, Untreated 376 7.5 - 24 Chlorimuron ethyl H Water, Finished 144 8 5.6 9.5 - 22 5.7 - 13 Water, Untreated 144 18 12.5 9.5 - 52 5.7 - 13
Chlorothalonil F Water, Finished 111 50 ^ Water, Untreated 113 50 ^ Chlorpyrifos I Water, Finished 230 6.0 - 11 20,000 Water, Untreated 232 6.0 - 11 Chlorpyrifos methyl I Water, Finished 230 11.3 - 14 Water, Untreated 232 11.3 - 14 Chlorpyrifos oxygen analog IM Water, Finished 111 510 ^ Water, Untreated 113 510 ^ Clopyralid H Water, Finished 364 35 9.6 5.7 - 190 3.4 - 151 Water, Untreated 365 30 8.2 5.7 - 100 3.4 - 151 Coumaphos I Water, Finished 230 3.8 - 61 Water, Untreated 232 3.8 - 61 Cyanazine H Water, Finished 374 1.7 - 25 1000 Water, Untreated 376 4 1.1 2.8 ^ 1.7 - 25 Cycloate H Water, Finished 256 3.3 - 6.0 Water, Untreated 255 3.3 - 6.0 Cyfluthrin I Water, Finished 255 40 - 75 Water, Untreated 257 40 - 75 Cyhalothrin, Total (Cyhalothrin-L + R157836 epimer) I Water, Finished 255 21 - 75 Water, Untreated 257 21 - 75

Appendix J. Page 3 of 16Pesticide / Commodity Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detects % of Samples

with Detects Range of Values Detected, ppt Range of LODs, ppt EPA MCL, ppt 1 EPA HA 2

, ppt 1 EPA FAO 3

, ppt 1 

### Cypermethrin I Water, Finished 255 74 - 90 Water, Untreated 257 74 - 90
DCPA H Water, Finished 230 0.80 - 2.5 70,000 Water, Untreated 232 0.75 - 2.5
DCPA monoacid HM Water, Finished 119 222 - 740 Water, Untreated 118 222 - 740 DDD o,p' IM Water, Finished 119 3.8 ^ Water, Untreated 119 3.8 ^ DDD p,p' IM Water, Finished 119 3.8 ^ Water, Untreated 119 3.8 ^ DDE o,p' IM Water, Finished 111 4.0 ^ Water, Untreated 113 4.0 ^ DDE p,p' IM Water, Finished 230 2.5 - 7.5 Water, Untreated 232 2.5 - 7.5 DDT o,p' I Water, Finished 119 3.8 ^ Water, Untreated 119 3.8 ^ DDT p,p' I Water, Finished 119 3.8 ^ Water, Untreated 119 3.8 ^ DEF (Tribufos) H Water, Finished 141 3.8 - 8.0 Water, Untreated 143 3.8 - 8.0 Deltamethrin (includes parent Tralomethrin) I Water, Finished 144 84 ^ Water, Untreated 144 84 ^ Desethyl atrazine HM Water, Finished 374 247 66.0 0.72 - 869 0.43 - 25 Water, Untreated 376 271 72.1 0.72 - 1078 0.43 - 25 Desisopropyl atrazine HM Water, Finished 374 150 40.1 2.7 - 139 1.6 - 50 Water, Untreated 376 167 44.4 2.7 - 330 1.6 - 50
Diazinon I Water, Finished 230 6.2 - 7.5 600 Water, Untreated 232 6.2 - 7.5 Diazinon oxygen analog IM Water, Finished 230 9.0 - 49 Water, Untreated 232 9.0 - 49

Appendix J. Page 4 of 16Pesticide / Commodity Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detects % of Samples

with Detects Range of Values Detected, ppt Range of LODs, ppt EPA MCL, ppt 1 EPA HA 2

, ppt 1 EPA FAO 3

, ppt 1



### Dicamba H Water, Finished 111 266 ^ 200,000 Water, Untreated 113 266 ^

Dichlobenil H Water, Finished 225 6.7 - 45 Water, Untreated 227 6.7 - 45 Dichlorprop H Water, Finished 119 5 4.2 3.0 ^ 1.8 ^ Water, Untreated 118 5 4.2 3.0 - 11 1.8 ^ Dichlorvos (DDVP) I Water, Finished 230 16 - 22.5 Water, Untreated 232 16 - 22.5

Dicloran F Water, Finished 119 7.5 ^ Water, Untreated 119 7.5 ^ Dicofol p,p' I Water, Finished 230 5.0 - 11.3 Water, Untreated 232 5.0 - 11.3 Dicrotophos I Water, Finished 111 132 ^ Water, Untreated 113 132 ^

Dieldrin I Water, Finished 230 5.0 - 15 2000 Water, Untreated 232 5.0 - 15 240

Dimethenamid ESA HM Water, Finished 111 45 ^ Water, Untreated 113 45 ^

Dimethenamid oxanilic acid HM Water, Finished 255 20 7.8 1.0 - 23 0.63 - 45 Water, Untreated 257 31 12.1 1.0 - 54 0.63 - 45

Dimethenamid/Dimethenamid P H Water, Finished 374 35 9.4 1.0 - 75 0.60 - 45 Water, Untreated 375 65 17.3 1.0 - 76 0.60 - 45

Dimethoate I Water, Finished 230 5.3 - 52 Water, Untreated 232 5.3 - 52

Dinoseb H Water, Finished 119 25 21.0 1.0 - 7.1 0.60 ^ 7000 7000 Water, Untreated 118 3 2.5 1.0 ^ 0.60 ^ Diphenamid H Water, Finished 119 24 ^ 200,000 Water, Untreated 119 24 ^

Disulfoton I Water, Finished 374 6.0 - 8.8 300 Water, Untreated 376 6.0 - 8.8

Appendix J. Page 5 of 16Pesticide / Commodity Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detects % of Samples

with Detects Range of Values Detected, ppt Range of LODs, ppt EPA MCL, ppt 1 EPA HA 2

, ppt 1 EPA FAO 3

, ppt 1



### Disulfoton sulfone IM Water, Finished 263 3.8 - 8.8 Water, Untreated 263 3.8 - 8.8

Diuron H Water, Finished 263 4 1.5 5.8 ^ 3.5 - 16 10,000 Water, Untreated 262 20 7.6 5.8 - 27 3.5 - 16

Endosulfan I I Water, Finished 230 5.0 - 22.5 Water, Untreated 232 5.0 - 22.5 220

Endosulfan II IM Water, Finished 230 12 - 18.8 220 Water, Untreated 232 12 - 18.8 220

Endosulfan sulfate IM Water, Finished 119 30 - 46.8 Water, Untreated 119 30 - 46.8

Endrin I Water, Finished 230 22 - 52.5 2000 2000 Water, Untreated 232 22 - 52.5 86

EPTC H Water, Finished 369 2.5 - 117.8 Water, Untreated 371 2.5 - 117.8

Esfenvalerate I Water, Finished 111 50 ^ Water, Untreated 113 50 ^

Esfenvalerate+Fenvalerate Total I Water, Finished 144 19 ^ Water, Untreated 144 19 ^

Ethalfluralin H Water, Finished 230 50 - 60 Water, Untreated 232 50 - 60

Ethion I Water, Finished 374 2.3 - 25 Water, Untreated 376 2.3 - 25

Ethion di oxon IM Water, Finished 111 35 ^ Water, Untreated 113 35 ^

Ethion mono oxon IM Water, Finished 230 3.8 - 51 Water, Untreated 232 3.8 - 51 Ethoprop I Water, Finished 369 4.5 - 6.0 Water, Untreated 371 4.5 - 6.0 Fenamiphos I Water, Finished 230 7.5 - 26 2000 Water, Untreated 232 7.5 - 26

Appendix J. Page 6 of 16Pesticide / Commodity Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detects % of Samples

with Detects Range of Values Detected, ppt Range of LODs, ppt EPA MCL, ppt 1 EPA HA 2

, ppt 1 EPA FAO 3

, ppt 1


### Fenamiphos sulfone IM Water, Finished 111 193 ^ Water, Untreated 113 193 ^

Fenarimol F Water, Finished 119 37.5 ^ Water, Untreated 119 37.5 ^
Fenitrothion I Water, Finished 374 6.0 - 52 Water, Untreated 376 6.0 - 52 Fenpropathrin I Water, Finished 263 14 - 60 Water, Untreated 263 14 - 60
Fenthion I Water, Finished 374 6.0 - 22 Water, Untreated 376 6.0 - 22 Fenthion-O analog IM Water, Finished 230 7.5 - 99 Water, Untreated 232 7.5 - 99

Fenuron H Water, Finished 230 15 - 27 Water, Untreated 231 15 - 27
Fludioxonil F Water, Finished 119 37.5 ^ Water, Untreated 119 37.5 ^
Flufenacet H Water, Finished 111 45 ^ Water, Untreated 113 45 ^
Flufenacet ESA HM Water, Finished 111 45 ^ Water, Untreated 113 45 ^
Flufenacet OA HM Water, Finished 144 24 16.7 1.2 - 26 0.75 ^ Water, Untreated 144 21 14.6 1.2 - 15 0.75 ^

Flumetsulam H Water, Finished 230 4 1.7 10 ^ 6.0 - 129 Water, Untreated 231 7 3.0 10 ^ 6.0 - 129

Fluometuron H Water, Finished 119 1.2 ^ 90,000 Water, Untreated 118 1 0.8 2.0 ^ 1.2 ^
Fluvalinate I Water, Finished 144 79 - 130 Water, Untreated 144 79 - 130
Fonofos I Water, Finished 119 7.5 ^ 10,000 Water, Untreated 119 7.5 ^

Appendix J. Page 7 of 16Pesticide / Commodity Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detects % of Samples

with Detects Range of Values Detected, ppt Range of LODs, ppt EPA MCL, ppt 1 EPA HA 2

, ppt 1 EPA FAO 3

, ppt 1



### Formetanate I Water, Finished 18 1500 ^ Water, Untreated 20 1500 ^ Halosulfuron methyl H Water, Finished 144 3.3 ^ Water, Untreated 144 3.3 ^ Heptachlor I Water, Finished 111 5.0 ^ 400 Water, Untreated 113 5.0 ^ 520 Heptachlor epoxide IM Water, Finished 230 5.0 - 15 200 Water, Untreated 232 5.0 - 15 520

Hexachlorobenzene FM Water, Finished 111 10 ^ 1000 Water, Untreated 113 10 ^ Hydroxy Atrazine HM Water, Finished 144 96 66.7 4.2 - 120 1.2 ^ Water, Untreated 144 97 67.4 2.0 - 440 1.2 ^ 3-Hydroxycarbofuran IM Water, Finished 230 24 - 46 Water, Untreated 231 24 - 46

Imazamethabenz acid H Water, Finished 144 1 0.7 2.2 ^ 0.60 ^ Water, Untreated 144 1 0.7 2.0 ^ 0.60 ^ Imazamethabenz methyl H Water, Finished 374 1 0.3 5.2 ^ 0.15 - 4.2 Water, Untreated 375 1 0.3 5.2 ^ 0.15 - 4.2

Imazamox H Water, Finished 263 1 0.4 4.0 ^ 1.8 - 3.1 Water, Untreated 262 1.8 - 3.1 Imazapic H Water, Finished 263 5 1.9 1.5 - 4.0 0.90 - 2.4 Water, Untreated 262 5 1.9 1.5 - 4.0 0.90 - 2.4 Imazapyr H Water, Finished 263 156 59.3 1.5 - 31 0.90 - 1.0 Water, Untreated 262 116 44.3 1.5 - 29 0.90 - 1.0 Imazaquin H Water, Finished 374 27 7.2 1.8 - 38 1.1 - 9.3 Water, Untreated 375 27 7.2 1.8 - 58 1.1 - 9.3 Imazethapyr H Water, Finished 374 77 20.6 2.0 - 63 1.0 - 7.9 Water, Untreated 375 67 17.9 2.0 - 36 1.0 - 7.9 Imidacloprid I Water, Finished 230 1.5 - 42 Water, Untreated 231 1.5 - 42

Appendix J. Page 8 of 16Pesticide / Commodity Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detects % of Samples

with Detects Range of Values Detected, ppt Range of LODs, ppt EPA MCL, ppt 1 EPA HA 2

, ppt 1 EPA FAO 3

, ppt 1


### Isofenphos I Water, Finished 230 4.5 - 9.5 Water, Untreated 232 4.5 - 9.5 Isofenphos oxygen analog IM Water, Finished 111 52 ^ Water, Untreated 113 52 ^ Lindane (BHC gamma) I Water, Finished 374 10 - 20 200 200 Water, Untreated 376 10 - 20 950

Linuron H Water, Finished 374 2.5 - 189 Water, Untreated 376 2 0.5 4.2 - 11 2.5 - 189

Malathion I Water, Finished 374 6.0 - 21 100,000 Water, Untreated 376 6.0 - 21 Malathion oxygen analog IM Water, Finished 119 6.0 ^ Water, Untreated 119 6.0 ^

MCPA H Water, Finished 374 1 0.3 152 ^ 7.2 - 91 4000 Water, Untreated 375 7.2 - 91

MCPB H Water, Finished 374 6.6 - 228 Water, Untreated 375 6.6 - 228 Mecoprop (MCPP) H Water, Finished 111 52 ^ Water, Untreated 113 52 ^ Metalaxyl F Water, Finished 374 3.0 - 36 Water, Untreated 376 1 0.3 10 ^ 3.0 - 36

Methidathion I Water, Finished 230 5.3 - 31 Water, Untreated 232 5.3 - 31 Methidathion oxygen analog IM Water, Finished 230 22.5 - 915 Water, Untreated 232 22.5 - 915
Methiocarb I Water, Finished 230 15 - 22 Water, Untreated 231 15 - 22 Methomyl I Water, Finished 230 3.6 - 25 200,000 Water, Untreated 231 3.6 - 25 Methoxychlor olefin IM Water, Finished 119 3.8 ^ 40,000 40,000 Water, Untreated 119 3.8 ^

Appendix J. Page 9 of 16Pesticide / Commodity Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detects % of Samples

with Detects Range of Values Detected, ppt Range of LODs, ppt EPA MCL, ppt 1 EPA HA 2

, ppt 1 EPA FAO 3

, ppt 1 

### Methoxychlor Total I Water, Finished 230 7.5 - 40 40,000 40,000 Water, Untreated 232 7.5 - 40
Metolachlor H Water, Finished 374 161 43.0 2.5 - 290 1.5 - 45 100,000 Water, Untreated 376 184 48.9 2.5 - 430 1.5 - 45
Metolachlor ethanesulfonic acid HM Water, Finished 374 277 74.1 0.60 - 1917 0.36 - 45 Water, Untreated 376 280 74.5 0.60 - 3603 0.36 - 45
Metolachlor oxanilic acid HM Water, Finished 374 235 62.8 5.3 - 1200 3.2 - 45 Water, Untreated 376 246 65.4 5.3 - 1500 3.2 - 45
Metribuzin H Water, Finished 230 35 - 45 200,000 Water, Untreated 232 35 - 45 Metsulfuron methyl H Water, Finished 238 1.5 - 28 Water, Untreated 237 4 1.7 2.5 - 5.0 1.5 - 28 Mevinphos Total I Water, Finished 230 6.0 - 15 Water, Untreated 232 6.0 - 15
Molinate H Water, Finished 225 9.8 - 12 Water, Untreated 227 9.8 - 12

Monuron H Water, Finished 230 6.0 - 54 Water, Untreated 231 6.0 - 54 Myclobutanil F Water, Finished 230 4 1.7 18.8 ^ 5.0 - 11.3 Water, Untreated 232 2 0.9 18.8 ^ 5.0 - 11.3 Napropamide H Water, Finished 230 24 - 25 Water, Untreated 232 24 - 25

Neburon H Water, Finished 374 1.2 - 75 Water, Untreated 375 1.2 - 75
Nicosulfuron H Water, Finished 263 20 7.6 3.0 - 35 1.8 - 4.8 Water, Untreated 262 31 11.8 3.0 - 35 1.8 - 4.8
Norflurazon H Water, Finished 230 18.8 - 31 Water, Untreated 232 18.8 - 31 Norflurazon desmethyl HM Water, Finished 225 37.5 - 72 Water, Untreated 227 37.5 - 72

Appendix J. Page 10 of 16Pesticide / Commodity Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detects % of Samples

with Detects Range of Values Detected, ppt Range of LODs, ppt EPA MCL, ppt 1 EPA HA 2

, ppt 1 EPA FAO 3

, ppt 1



### Oxadiazon H Water, Finished 230 15 ^ Water, Untreated 232 15 ^
Oxadixyl F Water, Finished 119 48.8 ^ Water, Untreated 119 48.8 ^
Oxamyl I Water, Finished 230 6.0 - 20 200,000 200,000 Water, Untreated 231 6.0 - 20
Oxychlordane IM Water, Finished 119 7.5 ^ Water, Untreated 119 7.5 ^
Oxydemeton methyl I Water, Finished 111 255 ^ Water, Untreated 113 255 ^
Oxyfluorfen H Water, Finished 230 11.3 - 25 Water, Untreated 232 11.3 - 25
Parathion ethyl I Water, Finished 263 7.5 - 15 Water, Untreated 263 7.5 - 15
Parathion methyl I Water, Finished 263 4.5 - 53 Water, Untreated 263 4.5 - 53
Parathion methyl oxygen analog IM Water, Finished 230 9.8 - 195 Water, Untreated 232 9.8 - 195
Parathion oxygen analog IM Water, Finished 230 7.5 - 104 Water, Untreated 232 7.5 - 104

Pebulate H Water, Finished 225 2.3 - 25 Water, Untreated 227 2.3 - 25

Pendimethalin H Water, Finished 230 4.5 - 5.0 Water, Untreated 232 4.5 - 5.0

Permethrin cis IM Water, Finished 255 1 0.4 68 ^ 4.5 - 8.0 Water, Untreated 257 4.5 - 8.0

Permethrin trans I Water, Finished 144 7.5 ^ Water, Untreated 144 7.5 ^

Appendix J. Page 11 of 16Pesticide / Commodity Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detects % of Samples

with Detects Range of Values Detected, ppt Range of LODs, ppt EPA MCL, ppt 1 EPA HA 2

, ppt 1 EPA FAO 3

, ppt 1



### Phenthoate I Water, Finished 119 15 ^ Water, Untreated 119 15 ^

Phorate I Water, Finished 230 5.2 - 11.3 Water, Untreated 232 5.2 - 11.2
Phorate oxygen analog IM Water, Finished 230 5.3 - 10 Water, Untreated 232 5.3 - 10

Phorate sulfone IM Water, Finished 230 6.0 - 16 Water, Untreated 232 6.0 - 16

Phorate sulfoxide IM Water, Finished 230 37.5 - 199 Water, Untreated 232 37.5 - 199

Phosalone I Water, Finished 230 4.5 - 52 Water, Untreated 232 4.5 - 52
Phosalone oxygen analog IM Water, Finished 111 631 ^ Water, Untreated 113 631 ^

Phosmet I Water, Finished 111 227 ^ Water, Untreated 113 227 ^
Phosphamidon I Water, Finished 230 12 - 297 Water, Untreated 232 12 - 297

Picloram H Water, Finished 374 22 - 447 500,000 500,000 Water, Untreated 375 1 0.3 37 ^ 22 - 447
Piperonyl butoxide I Water, Finished 119 18.8 ^ Water, Untreated 119 18.8 ^

Pirimicarb I Water, Finished 119 37.5 ^ Water, Untreated 119 37.5 ^
Pirimiphos methyl I Water, Finished 230 5.3 - 8.8 Water, Untreated 232 5.3 - 8.8

Prallethrin I Water, Finished 144 25 ^ Water, Untreated 144 25 ^

Appendix J. Page 12 of 16Pesticide / Commodity Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detects % of Samples

with Detects Range of Values Detected, ppt Range of LODs, ppt EPA MCL, ppt 1 EPA HA 2

, ppt 1 EPA FAO 3

, ppt 1



### Profenofos I Water, Finished 230 3.8 - 30 Water, Untreated 232 3.8 - 30

Prometon H Water, Finished 374 199 53.2 0.28 - 83 0.17 - 50 100,000 Water, Untreated 376 212 56.4 0.28 - 65 0.17 - 50
Prometryn H Water, Finished 374 11 2.9 0.28 - 89 0.17 - 24 Water, Untreated 376 54 14.4 0.28 - 118 0.17 - 24

Pronamide H Water, Finished 230 5.0 - 22.5 50,000 Water, Untreated 232 5.0 - 22.5
Propachlor H Water, Finished 374 1 0.3 2.1 ^ 0.64 - 16 90,000 Water, Untreated 376 0.64 - 16
Propachlor OA HM Water, Finished 144 1.4 ^ Water, Untreated 144 1.4 ^
Propanil H Water, Finished 374 2.9 - 25 Water, Untreated 376 2.9 - 25
Propargite I Water, Finished 230 90 - 180 Water, Untreated 232 90 - 180
Propetamphos I Water, Finished 230 6.0 - 8.4 Water, Untreated 232 6.0 - 8.4
Propham H Water, Finished 119 18 ^ 100,000 Water, Untreated 118 18 ^
Propiconazole F Water, Finished 230 37.5 - 55 Water, Untreated 232 37.5 - 55
Propoxur I Water, Finished 119 24.8 ^ Water, Untreated 119 24.8 ^
Quintozene (PCNB) F Water, Finished 119 11.3 ^ Water, Untreated 119 11.3 ^

Resmethrin I Water, Finished 144 7.8 ^ Water, Untreated 144 7.8 ^

Appendix J. Page 13 of 16Pesticide / Commodity Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detects % of Samples

with Detects Range of Values Detected, ppt Range of LODs, ppt EPA MCL, ppt 1 EPA HA 2

, ppt 1 EPA FAO 3

, ppt 1


### S-(2-hydroxy)propyl EPTC HM Water, Finished 111 125 ^ Water, Untreated 113 125 ^

Siduron H Water, Finished 263 1 0.4 3.5 ^ 2.1 - 2.4 Water, Untreated 262 3 1.1 3.5 - 16 2.1 - 2.4

Simazine H Water, Finished 374 179 47.9 1.2 - 287 0.71 - 50 4000 4,000 Water, Untreated 376 202 53.7 1.2 - 731 0.71 - 50
Sulfometuron methyl H Water, Finished 255 2 0.8 3.2 - 13 1.9 - 15 Water, Untreated 257 5 1.9 3.2 - 14 1.9 - 15
Sulfotep I Water, Finished 225 2.4 - 4.5 Water, Untreated 227 2.4 - 4.5
Sulprofos I Water, Finished 230 6.0 - 11 Water, Untreated 232 6.0 - 11
Sulprofos oxygen analog IM Water, Finished 111 37 ^ Water, Untreated 113 37 ^

Tebuconazole F Water, Finished 230 60 - 62 Water, Untreated 232 60 - 62
Tebupirimfos I Water, Finished 230 5.6 - 7.5 Water, Untreated 232 5.6 - 7.5
Tebupirimfos oxygen analog IM Water, Finished 230 9.0 - 13 Water, Untreated 232 9.0 - 13

Tebuthiuron H Water, Finished 374 141 37.7 0.35 - 3.8 0.21 - 10 500,000 Water, Untreated 375 164 43.7 0.35 - 7.8 0.21 - 10

Tecnazene P Water, Finished 114 18.8 ^ Water, Untreated 114 18.8 ^

Tefluthrin I Water, Finished 255 2.1 - 5.0 Water, Untreated 257 2.1 - 5.0

Terbacil H Water, Finished 119 22.5 ^ 90,000 Water, Untreated 119 22.5 ^

Appendix J. Page 14 of 16Pesticide / Commodity Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detects % of Samples

with Detects Range of Values Detected, ppt Range of LODs, ppt EPA MCL, ppt 1 EPA HA 2

, ppt 1 EPA FAO 3

, ppt 1



### Terbufos I Water, Finished 255 5.2 - 6.3 900 Water, Untreated 257 5.2 - 6.3

Terbufos sulfone IM Water, Finished 230 4.5 - 7.7 Water, Untreated 232 4.5 - 7.7
Terbufos-O analog IM Water, Finished 230 6.0 - 12 Water, Untreated 232 6.0 - 12
Tetrachlorvinphos I Water, Finished 230 6.0 - 63 Water, Untreated 232 6.0 - 63

Tetradifon I Water, Finished 89 37.5 ^ Water, Untreated 89 37.5 ^

Tetramethrin I Water, Finished 144 28 ^ Water, Untreated 144 28 ^

Thifensulfuron H Water, Finished 144 1.7 - 8.9 Water, Untreated 144 1 0.7 2.8 ^ 1.7 - 8.9

Thiobencarb H Water, Finished 263 1.6 - 24.8 Water, Untreated 263 1.6 - 24.8

Thiodicarb I Water, Finished 111 25 ^ Water, Untreated 113 25 ^
Tolclofos methyl F Water, Finished 111 5.0 ^ Water, Untreated 113 5.0 ^

Tralomethrin I Water, Finished 111 300 ^ Water, Untreated 113 300 ^

Tri Allate H Water, Finished 374 11 - 24.8 Water, Untreated 376 11 - 24.8

Triadimefon F Water, Finished 230 5.0 - 22.5 Water, Untreated 232 5.0 - 22.5

Triasulfuron H Water, Finished 144 1.6 - 3.1 Water, Untreated 144 1.6 - 3.1

Appendix J. Page 15 of 16Pesticide / Commodity Pest. Type Number of Samples Samples with Detects % of Samples

with Detects Range of Values Detected, ppt Range of LODs, ppt EPA MCL, ppt 1 EPA HA 2

, ppt 1 EPA FAO 3

, ppt 1


### Triclopyr H Water, Finished 230 74 32.2 10 - 174 6.0 - 42 Water, Untreated 231 70 30.3 10 - 283 6.0 - 42

Trifluralin H Water, Finished 220 1.5 - 3.3 5000 Water, Untreated 222 1.5 - 3.3

Vinclozolin F Water, Finished 200 5.0 - 6.0 Water, Untreated 202 5.0 - 6.0

NOTES

1 = EPA MCL, HA, and FAO values have been multiplied by a factor of 1,000,000 as a basis for comparison using a single scale. There is no intention to imply any more exactness in the value than that originally expressed by EPA.

2 = EPA Health Advisory values shown are for lifetime exposure.

3 = The FAO value applies to ambient water rather than drinking water.

4 = The MCL for chlordane is inclusive of the isomers.

^ = Only one distinct detected concentration or LOD value was reported for the pair.

Pesticide Types: F = Fungicide, FM = Fungicide Metabolite H = Herbicide, HM = Herbicide Metabolite I = Insecticide, IM = Insecticide Metabolite P = Plant Growth Regulator

Appendix J. Page 16 of 16

# Appendix K

Sample Origin by State or Country (Determined by Grower, Packer, or Distributor)

Appendix K gives the numberof fruit and vegetables, dairy, and bottled water samples per State or country of origin and the number of samples of unknown origin. Where available, origin of fresh commoditi es is taken from the grower or packer information. For processed commodities, origin is determined primarily by packer or distributor.
As shown in Appendix K, fruit and veget able, dairy, and bottled water samples originated from 39 States and 27 foreign countries. There were 247 domestic and 53 imported samples from unknown States and countries, respectively. There were an additional 93 samples from unk nown countries of origin. Pork, soybean, and wheat samples were all of domestic origin. Overall, for all samples except drinking water, 84 percent were from U.S. sour ces, 14 percent were imports , 1 percent were of mixed origin, and approximately 1 perc ent were of unknown origin.

### Part 1. Domestic Samples

H 2 O No. of % of
States = 39 AP CF CN EP GB GF GR LT OG PE PU ST WM WS GZ OJ PD CM MK WB Domestic Total

Alabama 2 2 <0.1

Arizona 1 12 11 1 3 1 1 2 28 3 63 0.5

Arkansas 8 5 3 13 9 38 0.3

California 36 678 155 123 330 324 652 595 87 310 604 32 147 64 79 111 73 156 58 4614 39.6

Colorado 1 4 1 1 6 1 5 2 1 1 23 4 50 0.4

Connecticut 3 1 1 3 55 63 0.5

Florida 1 4 59 72 60 211 20 5 62 3 7 65 27 27 29 256 1 23 59 16 1007 8.6 Georgia 1 2 56 2 16 3 10 16 106 0.9

Hawaii 4 4 <0.1

Idaho 8 1 42 35 4 21 33 6 150 1.3

Illinois 2 2 16 7 2 6 25 1 61 0.5

Kansas 4 4 <0.1 Kentucky 2 1 5 11 2 21 0.2

Louisiana 11 2 <0.1

Maine 1 5 1 1 1 3 12 0.1 Maryland 3 2 5 6 1 1 6 2 2 28 16 1 19 28 3 123 1.1

Massachusetts 2 1 2 11 20 1 37 0.3 Michigan 33 14 6 1 2 6 39 27 10 5 23 39 13 218 1.9

Minnesota 1 3 1 4 3 2 1 28 8 11 22 5 89 0.8
Mississippi 1 1 <0.1

Missouri 1 1 1 4 7 0.1
New Hampshire 1 1 <0.1 New Jersey 15 3 17 3 5 16 38 97 0.8

New Mexico 1 4 5 <0.1

New York 53 1 16 5 2 22 55 1 4 10 31 34 234 2.0

North Carolina 7 5 2 3 1 6 3 2 29 0.2

Ohio 5 2 2 12 7 1 1 1 2 23 38 32 2 39 85 23 275 2.4

Oklahoma 3 3 <0.1 Oregon 6 91 2 30 4 2 10 7 152 1.3 Pennsylvania 2 1 1 1 1 1 10 3 6 11 7 44 0.4

Rhode Island 1 1 <0.1

South Carolina 4 4 <0.1

Tennessee 19 6 25 0.2

Texas 20 22 20 16 7 172 12 23 29 11 15 26 10 45 63 5 54 88 21 659 5.7

Vermont 1 1 <0.1 Virginia 3 3 2 5 13 0.1 Washington 540 3 5 3 9 231 6 12 7 1 21 22 4 864 7.4 West Virginia 1 1 <0.1

Wisconsin 4 3 3 3 1 4 2 3 1 3 1 2 3 6 5 2 8 15 3 72 0.6

Unknown State 7 8 3 56 7 9 5 10 13 10 11 4 15 52 3 5 1 5 23 247 2.1
No. of Domestics 724 725 269 424 106 735 371 733 705 443 340 693 114 408 474 554 146 369 746 320 9,399

% of Total 97 98 48 58 59 99 50 99 95 80 59 94 63 56 85 74 95 100 100 85 80.7
Number and Percentage computed with 690 Pork samples, 974 Soybean samples, and 674 Wheat samples of domestic origin added: 11,7 37 83.8 Processed F&V Dairy Fresh F&V 

## APPENDIX K. SAMPLE ORIGIN BY STATE OR COUNTRY 1 

## (Determined by Grower, Packer, or Distributor)

Appendix K. Page 1 of 3

### Part 2. Imported Samples

H 2 O No. of % of Countries = 27 AP CF CN EP GB GF GR LT OG PE PU ST WM WS GZ OJ PD CM MK WB Imports Total Argentina 51 2 53 0.5
Australia 18 18 0.2
Bahamas 2 2 <0.1 Belgium 3 3 <0.1
Belize 1 1 <0.1
Brazil 3 22 25 0.2
Canada 4 7 3 3 2 10 39 11 79 0.7
Chile 8 284 1 46 227 4 570 4.9
China 6 6 0.1
Costa Rica 83 5 88 0.8 Dominican Republic 2 2 <0.1 Egypt 6 6 0.1 Fiji 14 14 0.1
France 9 1 26 36 0.3
Guatemala 90 4 94 0.8
Honduras 86 15 36 137 1.2 Japan 1 1 <0.1 Korea, Republic of 2 2 <0.1
Mexico 6 9 265 59 2 63 3 2 1 43 48 258 1 3 763 6.6
Netherlands 6 6 0.1
New Zealand 7 1 1 2 11 0.1 Nicaragua 3 1 4 8 0.1
Panama 1 1 <0.1
Peru 4 1 5 <0.1
South Africa 12 1 13 0.1
Taiwan 1 1 <0.1 United Kingdom 1 1 <0.1 Unknown Country 2 14 1 13 6 1 15 1 53 0.5 No. of Imports 19 15 287 289 59 5 367 6 33 110 230 44 53 310 80 32 5 0 0 55 1999

% of Total 3 2 51 39 33 1 50 1 4 20 40 6 29 42 14 4 3 0 0 14 17.2
Number and Percentage computed with 14 Pork samples originating from Canada added: 2,013 14.4



### Part 3. Mixed National Origin Samples

H 2 O No. of % of GZ OJ PD CM MK WB Mixed Orig Total Argentina / Chile / France / USA 1 1 <0.1
Belize / Brazil 1 1 <0.1
Belize / Brazil / Mexico / USA 2 2 <0.1
Belize / Costa Rica 4 4 <0.1
Brazil / Costa Rica 2 2 <0.1
Brazil / Costa Rica / USA 10 10 0.1
Brazil / Mexico 7 7 0.1
Brazil / Mexico / USA 40 40 0.3
Brazil / USA 81 81 0.7
Honduras / Mexico / USA 4 4 <0.1
Mexico / USA 2 2 <0.1 Multi-Country Origin - Countries Unknown 2 2 <0.1 No. of Mixed National Origin Samples 155 1 156

% of Total 21 1 1.3 Fresh F&V Processed F&V Dairy

Processed F&V Dairy



### Appendix K. Page 2 of 3

### Part 4. Unknown Origin Samples

H 2 O No. of % of

AP CF CN EP GB GF GR LT OG PE PU ST WM WS GZ OJ PD CM MK WB Unknown Total
Unknown Origin 1 2 23 16 2 1 4 3 2 3 15 13 1 3 1 3 93

% of Total <1 <1 3 9 <1 <1 1 <1 <1 1 8 2 <1 <1 1 1 0.8

SAMPLE TOTALS 743 741 558 736 181 742 739 743 741 555 573 737 182 731 555 744 153 369 746 378 11,647 Grand Total computed with 704 Pork samples, 974 Soybean samples, and 674 Wheat samples added: 13,999



### NOTE

1 Excludes soybean, wheat, pork, and treated/untreated drinking water samples.

Commodity Legend AP = Apples GR = Grapes PE = Pears CF = Cauliflower GZ = Green Beans (Frozen) PU = Plums CM = Heavy Cream LT = Lettuce ST = Strawberries CN = Cantaloupe MK = Milk WB = Bottled Water EP = Eggplant OG = Oranges WM = Watermelon GB = Green Beans OJ = Orange Juice WS = Winter Squash GF = Grapefruit PD = Plums, Dried (Prunes) Processed F&V Dairy Fresh F&V



### Appendix K. Page 3 of 3

# Appendix L

Import vs. Domestic Pesticide Residue Comparisons

PDP is designed to provide a comprehensi ve statistical picture of pesticide residues in the U.S. food s upply, representing all source s, including imports. Most commodities consumed are generally produc ed in the United St ates with import components that vary by commodity. Howeve r, several commodities tested over the past several years were cyclical; that is, par t of the year the commodity was produced domestically and part of the y ear it was imported.
Appendix L compares resi due data reported for sample s originating in the United States with those of the same comm odity from major ex porting countries. Residue data for domestic winter squas h are compared with data for samples originating in Mexico for 2005 only. Resi due data for grapes from the United States are compared with data for samples origi nating in Chile for 2004 and 2005. For cantaloupe, 2003-2005 data from Costa Rica, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua were combined and compared with data fr om the United States. Only residues detected in more than 10 percent of all sa mples are included in each comparison. All pesticides detected were regi stered in the United States. However, the profiles of residue findings were markedly different in the United States samples versus samples from these exporting countries. The diffe rences in residue detections between countries were likely due to the pesticides used in response to pest pressures based on differing environmental, climat ic, and growing conditions.

### Origin Year # of Samples Analyzed # of Samples w/ Detections % of Samples w/ Detections # of Residues Detected

United States 2005 408 177 43.4 250

Mexico 2005 258 98 38.0 147

Pesticide Origin # of Samples Analyzed # of Samples w/ Detections % of Samples w/ Detections

Dieldrin United States 408 48 11.8 Mexico 258 0 0

Endosulfan sulfate United States 408 46 11.3 Mexico 258 57 22.1

o-Phenylphenol United States 376 72 19.1 Mexico 250 50 20.0

NOTE: The Limits of Detection (LODs) for pesticide detections in winter squash are listed in Appendix B. 

# Appendix L. Import vs. Domestic Pesticide Residue Comparisons

2005 Distribution of Residues for Winter Squash United States Samples vs. Samples Originating in Mexico

2005 Distribution of Residues for Winter Squash Samples Originating in Mexico vs. United States (Only Pesticides with Residue Detections in at least 10 Percent of all Samples)

Appendix L. Page 1 of 3

### Origin Year # of Samples Analyzed # of Samples w/ Detections % of Samples w/ Detections # of Residues Detected

United States 2004 390 271 69.5 473 2005 371 215 58.0 397 2004-2005 761 486 63.9 870

Chile 2004 287 256 89.2 768 2005 284 244 85.9 737 2004-2005 571 500 87.6 1,505

Pesticide Origin # of Samples Analyzed # of Samples w/ Detections % of Samples w/ Detections
Captan United States 726 18 2.5 Chile 571 235 41.2

Chlorpyrifos United States 761 15 2.0 Chile 571 162 28.4

Cyprodinil United States 761 172 22.6 Chile 571 201 35.2

Ethephon United States 186 106 57.0 Chile 255 44 17.3

Fludioxonil United States 761 9 1.2 Chile 571 176 30.8

Imidacloprid United States 761 120 15.8 Chile 571 80 14.0

Iprodione United States 761 22 2.9 Chile 571 166 29.1

Myclobutanil United States 761 141 18.5 Chile 571 53 9.3

NOTE: The Limits of Detection (LODs) for pesticide detections in grapes are listed in Appendix B. 

# 2004-2005 Distribution of Residues for Grapes United States Samples vs. Samples Originating in Chile

2004-2005 Distribution of Residues for Grape Samples Originating in Chile vs. United States (Only Pesticides with Residue Detections in at least 10 Percent of all Samples)

Appendix L. Page 2 of 3

### Origin Year # o f S amples Analyzed # o f S amples w/ Detections % o f S amples w/ Detections # o fResidues Detected

United States 2003 144 69 47.9 84 2004 394 132 33.5 165 2005 269 102 37.9 141 2003-2005 807 303 37.5 390

Central America 1 

### 2003 35 33 94.3 52 2004 325 258 79.4 436 2005 262 173 66.0 281 2003-2005 622 464 74.6 769

Pesticide Origin # o f S amples Analyzed # o f S amples w/ Detections % o f S amples w/ Detections

Endosulfan sulfate United States 807 192 23.8 Central America 1 

### 622 372 59.8

Methomyl United States 807 37 4.6 Central America 1 

### 622 205 33.0

1 

### Combined findings from Costa Rica, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua.

NOTE: The Limits of Detection (LODs) for pesticide detections in cantaloupe are listed in Appendix B. 

# 2003-2005 Distribution of Residues for Cantaloupe Samples Originating in Central America 1 

# vs. United States (Only Pesticides with Residue Detections in at least 10 Percent of all Samples) 

# Central America 1 

# 2003-2005 Distribution of Residues for Cantaloupe United States Samples vs. Samples Originating in

Appendix L. Page 3 of 3

# Appendix M

National Estimates for Concentration Percentiles vs. Tolerance (Pairs With Residue Detections in at Least 10 Percent of Samples)

Appendix M shows 78 pesticide/commoditypairs (including metabolites, isomers, and degradates) with dete ctions in at least 10 percent of the samples tested. Concentrations detected are arranged in percent iles. The 90th percentile is compared to the Environmental Protection Agency to lerance established for each pesticide/ commodity pair.
The meaning of a percentile can be most ea sily explained through an example. For the apples/thiabendazole pair, the 50th percentile, or medi an, is estimated to be 0.13 ppm. This means that PDP estimates that at least 50 percent of apples available to U.S. consumers had thiabendazole residues of 0.13 ppm or less, while at least 50 percent had residues of 0.13 ppm or more. Similarly, t he 75th percentile (or the upper quartile) for this pair is estimated to be 0. 49 ppm, which means that at least 75 percent of apples had thiabendazole resi dues of 0.49 ppm or less, while at least 25 percent had residues of 0.49 ppm or more. Finally, the 90th percent ile is estimated to be 1.2 ppm, meaning that at least 90 percent of all apples had th iabendazole residues of 1.2 ppm or less, while at least 10 percent had residues of 1.2 ppm or more.
Percent detections and percentiles for appl es, cantaloupe, cauliflower, eggplant, grapefruit, grapes, lettuce, oranges, pears, pl ums, strawberries, and winter squash were weighted based on marketing data.

### APPENDIX M. NATIONAL ESTIMATES FOR CONCENTRATION PERCENTILES vs. TOLERANC E (Pairs With Residue Detections in at Least 10 Percent of Samples 1 

### )

% of Ratio of Samples with Mean (ppm) 2 

### Percentiles (ppm) 90th Percentile Commodity / Pesticide Detections Lower Upper 50th 75th 90th to Tolerance 1 Apples (W) Acetamiprid 80.0 0.014 0.014 0.007 0.019 0.036 0.036 Azinphos methyl 32.4 0.017 0.024 * 0.02 0.06 0.037 Carbendazim (MBC) 20.0 0.004 0.004 * * 0.004 0.001 Diphenylamine 81.5 0.37 0.37 0.041 0.57 1.2 0.12 Imidacloprid 26.1 0.001 0.003 * * 0.002 0.004 Phosmet 20.6 0.010 0.013 * * 0.028 0.003 Tetrahydrophthalimide (THPI) 14.8 0.030 0.057 * * 0.092 0.004 Thiabendazole 87.9 0.41 0.42 0.13 0.49 1.2 0.12

2 Cantaloupe (W) (January - September only) Endosulfan sulfate 19.4 0.004 0.009 * * 0.018 0.009 Methomyl 11.1 0.005 0.016 * * 0.014 0.070

3 Cauliflower (W) Imidacloprid 84.8 0.003 0.003 0.001 0.003 0.007 0.002

4 Eggplant (W) Endosulfan sulfate 11.9 0.002 0.008 * * 0.007 0.004

5 Grapefruit (W) Imazalil 49.2 0.046 0.066 * 0.075 0.12 0.012 o-Phenylphenol 10.1 0.002 0.058 * < 0.001 0.012 0.001 Thiabendazole 34.0 0.037 0.057 * 0.055 0.13 0.013

6 Grapes (W) Captan 13.0 0.013 0.020 * * 0.030 0.001 Chlorpyrifos 10.5 0.003 0.006 * * 0.004 0.009 Cyprodinil 26.9 0.040 0.046 * 0.011 0.12 0.060 Fludioxonil 11.2 0.012 0.023 * * 0.029 0.029 Imidacloprid 18.6 0.008 0.016 * * 0.022 0.022 Iprodione 14.0 0.027 0.045 * * 0.057 0.001 Myclobutanil 16.8 0.011 0.030 * * 0.050 0.050 Tetrahydrophthalimide (THPI) 8.5 0.014 0.073 * * * <0.001

7 Green Beans, Frozen (April - December only) Acephate 26.8 0.033 0.036 * 0.006 0.075 0.025 Bifenthrin 12.6 0.003 0.010 * * 0.014 0.023 Methamidophos 25.4 0.014 0.017 * 0.003 0.041 0.041 Vinclozolin 47.4 0.024 0.025 * 0.031 0.072 0.036

8 Heavy Cream (in parts per billion) Cyaholothrin, Total 23.0 0.75 1.9 * * 3.8 0.019 DDE p,p' 86.7 3.6 3.7 2.0 5.3 8.0 0.006 Dieldrin 33.1 0.56 1.1 * 0.91 1.9 0.065 Diphenylamine 82.7 1.2 1.3 1.1 1.9 1.9 0.19 Endosulfan sulfate 15.2 0.63 0.89 * * 0.55 0.001

Appendix M. Page 1 of 3

### % of Ratio of Samples with Mean (ppm) 2 

### Percentiles (ppm) 90th Percentile Commodity / Pesticide Detections Lower Upper 50th 75th 90th to Tolerance
9 Lettuce (W) Acetamiprid 15.9 0.004 0.004 * * 0.003 0.017 Cyhalothrin, Lambda 10.3 0.006 0.011 * * 0.007 0.002 Cyaholothrin, Total 12.3 0.008 0.013 * * 0.015 0.008 DCPA 30.6 0.002 0.003 * 0.001 0.005 0.003 DDE p,p' 14.6 0.001 0.003 * * 0.004 0.007 Diazinon 13.3 0.001 0.002 * * 0.003 0.005 Dimethoate 10.0 0.001 0.003 * * 0.002 0.001 Dimethomorph 28.1 0.074 0.089 * 0.003 0.10 0.010 Imidacloprid 73.0 0.010 0.012 0.003 0.012 0.028 0.008 Methomyl 13.3 0.015 0.019 * * 0.006 0.001 Permethrin cis 11.9 0.003 0.005 * * 0.012 NT Permethrin trans 19.7 0.038 0.045 * * 0.069 0.003 o-Phenylphenol 17.6 0.035 0.041 * * 0.047 0.002

10 Milk (in parts per billion) Cyaholothrin, Total 20.8 0.078 0.20 * * 0.38 0.002 DDE p,p' 85.4 0.44 0.45 0.19 0.43 0.85 0.001 Dieldrin 23.2 0.040 0.10 * * 0.20 0.001 Diphenylamine 91.6 0.34 0.34 0.15 0.21 0.56 0.056 Endosulfan sulfate 15.4 0.024 0.049 * * 0.075 < 0.001

11 Orange Juice o-Phenylphenol 52.0 0.014 0.019 0.012 0.026 0.032 0.003

12 Oranges (W) Imazalil 74.2 0.095 0.10 0.075 0.13 0.21 0.021 o-Phenylphenol 32.8 0.009 0.015 * 0.019 0.032 0.003 Thiabendazole 44.8 0.050 0.067 * 0.075 0.14 0.014

13 Pears (W) (January - September only) Azinphos methyl 24.8 0.012 0.020 * * 0.040 0.027 Captan 11.5 0.027 0.035 * * 0.019 0.001 Carbaryl 9.8 0.007 0.014 * * * < 0.001 o-Phenylphenol 15.5 0.18 0.19 * * 0.036 0.001 Phosmet 14.0 0.018 0.023 * * 0.022 0.002 Thiabendazole 68.5 0.41 0.42 0.23 0.62 1.1 0.11

14 Plums (W) Fludioxonil 31.9 0.10 0.18 * 0.19 0.34 0.068 Iprodione 11.9 0.18 0.21 * * 0.35 0.018 Phosmet 29.3 0.007 0.009 * 0.006 0.015 0.003

15 Soybeans (in parts per billion) Chlorpyrifos 14.5 1.3 3.8 * * 5.5 0.018

Appendix M. Page 2 of 3

### % of Ratio of Samples with Mean (ppm) 2 

### Percentiles (ppm) 90th Percentile Commodity / Pesticide Detections Lower Upper 50th 75th 90th to Tolerance 16 Strawberries (W) Captan 63.6 0.31 0.32 0.008 0.32 0,81 0.032 Cyprodinil 14.4 0.040 0.10 * * 0.11 0.022 Fenhexamid 30.2 0.063 0.088 * 0.057 0.21 0.070 Fenpropathrin 12.3 0.014 0.024 * * 0.023 0.012 Fludioxonil 18.5 0.022 0.037 * * 0.087 0.044 Malathion 17.1 0.004 0.006 * * 0.009 0.001 Methomyl 14.8 0.053 0.065 * * 0.092 0.046 Myclobutanil 37.8 0.018 0.023 * 0.008 0.056 0.11 Tetrahydrophthalimide (THPI) 61.7 0.24 0.25 0.13 0.34 0.54 0.022 Triazole alanine (TA) 11.9 0.010 0.043 * * 0.044 NT

17 Wheat (in parts per billion) Chlorpyrifos methyl 23.1 29.6 44.2 * * 60.8 0.10 Malathion 66.9 55.6 56.6 11.0 45.0 119.0 0.015

18 Winter Squash (W) Endosulfan sulfate 17.6 0.003 0.009 * * 0.016 0.008 o-Phenylphenol 18.1 0.004 0.011 * * 0.019 NT

NOTES

1 Includes some pairs with detections in more than 10 percent of the samples, but with estimated detections in less than 10 percent of the population. Excludes pairs with less than 100 sample observations.

2 The mean is estimated with a range of values. The lower bound is calculated with non-detections valued at zero. The upper bound is calculated using the LOD.



### * The percentile value is estimated to be below the Limit of Detection (LOD)
(W) Weighted for utilization. The Percent of Samples with Detections was recalculated to reflect national estimates.

NT No Tolerance established.

Appendix M. Page 3 of 3

# Appendix N

Cumulative Distributions of Residues for Selected Pesticide/ Commodity Pairs

In Appendix N, the concentrations detect ed (in parts per million, except where otherwise noted) are plotted versus the calculated percentiles for the following 12 pesticide/commodity pairs:
Thiabendazole / Apples Imidacloprid / Cauliflower Imazalil / Grapefruit Vinclozolin / Green Beans (Frozen) Imazalil / Oranges DCPA / Lettuce Azinphos methyl / Pears Iprodione / Plums Captan / Strawberries THPI / Strawberries DDE p,p’ / Heavy Cream Malathion / Wheat

The distribution of residues for all of the PDP pesticide/commodity pairs has the same curved shape. For each pesticide/co mmodity pair, the highest percentile graphed in the appendix (99 th 

## ) is lower than the highest concentration detected in the sample (refer to the va lue shown in each graph ’ s legend). Inclusion of the highest concentration would cause graph distortion, which would ob scure concentrations in the low ranges. The tolerance for the pesticide/c ommodity pair is also indicated in the legend of each graph. The large dots show the percenta ge of the commodity at or below a given level of residue concentration . For example, an estimated 50 percent of apples available to U.S. consumers in 2005 had thiabendazole residue concentrations of 0.13 ppm or less. The solid li nes, tailing the large dots, depict percentage values. The lowest value of these solid lines in dicates the estimated percentage of the commodity available to U.S. consumers with no detectable residues. For thiabendazole in apples, this is 13 percent. The shaded bar denotes the range of values estimated for the mean. In some ca ses, there is convergence of the mean upper and lower bound into a single line due to the insigni ficant differences between them. For thiabendazole in apples, the mean r ange is approximatel y 0.41 – 0.42 ppm, corresponding to the 70th percentile.0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100


### Percentiles 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5Concentration - (parts per million)

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5

LEGEND Tolerance is 10 ppm Highest Level Detected is 7 ppm

MEAN

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100


### Percentiles 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5Concentration - (parts per million)

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100


### Percentiles 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5Concentration - (parts per million)

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5

LEGEND Tolerance is 10 ppm Highest Level Detected is 7 ppm

MEAN 

# Thiabendazole / Apples

PercentilesConcentration - (parts per million)

10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 0.0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.010 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.018 0.020

0.0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.010 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.018 0.020

LEGEND Tolerance is 3.5 ppm

MEAN



### PercentilesConcentration - (parts per million)

10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 0.0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.010 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.018 0.020

0.0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.010 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.018 0.020



### PercentilesConcentration - (parts per million)

10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 0.0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.010 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.018 0.020

0.0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.010 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.018 0.020

LEGEND Tolerance is 3.5 ppm

MEAN 

# Imidacloprid / Cauliflower

Highest Level Detected is 0.047 ppm



### Appendix N. Page 1 of 6 

# Appendix N. Cumulative Di stributions of Residues for Selected Pesticide/Commodity Pairs

### PercentilesConcentration - (parts per million)

30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 0.0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20 0.22 0.24 0.26 0.28

0.0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20 0.22 0.24 0.26 0.28

LEGEND Tolerance is 10 ppm Highest Level Detected is 0.55 ppm

MEAN



### PercentilesConcentration - (parts per million)

30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 0.0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20 0.22 0.24 0.26 0.28

0.0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20 0.22 0.24 0.26 0.28



### PercentilesConcentration - (parts per million)

30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 0.0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20 0.22 0.24 0.26 0.28

0.0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20 0.22 0.24 0.26 0.28

LEGEND Tolerance is 10 ppm Highest Level Detected is 0.55 ppm

MEAN 

# Imazalil / Grapefruit

PercentilesConcentration - (parts per million)

30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 0.0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20 0.22

0.0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20 0.22

LEGEND Tolerance is 2 ppm Highest Level Detected is 0.4 ppm

MEAN



### PercentilesConcentration - (parts per million)

30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 0.0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20 0.22

0.0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20 0.22



### PercentilesConcentration - (parts per million)

30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 0.0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20 0.22

0.0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20 0.22

LEGEND Tolerance is 2 ppm Highest Level Detected is 0.4 ppm

MEAN 

# Vinclozolin / Green Beans (Frozen)

Appendix N. Page 2 of 6

### PercentilesConcentration - (parts per million)

10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 0.0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45

0.0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45

LEGEND Tolerance is 10 ppm

MEAN



### PercentilesConcentration - (parts per million)

10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 0.0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45

0.0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45



### PercentilesConcentration - (parts per million)

10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 0.0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45

0.0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45

LEGEND Tolerance is 10 ppm

MEAN 

# Imazalil / Oranges

Highest Level Detected is 0.74 ppm



### PercentilesConcentration - (parts per million)

50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 0.0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.010 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.018 0.020

0.0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.010 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.018 0.020

LEGEND Tolerance is 2 ppm Highest Level Detected is 0.17 ppm

MEAN



### PercentilesConcentration - (parts per million)

50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 0.0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.010 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.018 0.020

0.0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.010 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.018 0.020



### PercentilesConcentration - (parts per million)

50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 0.0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.010 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.018 0.020

0.0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.010 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.018 0.020

LEGEND Tolerance is 2 ppm Highest Level Detected is 0.17 ppm

MEAN 

# DCPA / Lettuce

Appendix N. Page 3 of 6

### PercentilesConcentration - (parts per million)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 0.0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20

0.0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20

LEGEND Tolerance is 1.5 ppm Highest Level Detected is 0.33 ppm

MEAN



### PercentilesConcentration - (parts per million)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 0.0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20

0.0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20



### PercentilesConcentration - (parts per million)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 0.0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20

0.0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20

LEGEND Tolerance is 1.5 ppm Highest Level Detected is 0.33 ppm

MEAN 

# Azinphos methyl / Pears

PercentilesConcentration - (parts per million)

80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0

LEGEND Tolerance is 20 ppm Highest Level Detected is 7.1 ppm

MEAN



### PercentilesConcentration - (parts per million)

80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0



### PercentilesConcentration - (parts per million)

80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0

LEGEND Tolerance is 20 ppm Highest Level Detected is 7.1 ppm

MEAN 

# Iprodione / Plums

Appendix N. Page 4 of 6

### PercentilesConcentration - (parts per million)

20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5

LEGEND Tolerance is 25 ppm Highest Level Detected is 6.8 ppm

MEAN



### PercentilesConcentration - (parts per million)

20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5



### PercentilesConcentration - (parts per million)

20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5

LEGEND Tolerance is 25 ppm Highest Level Detected is 6.8 ppm

MEAN 

# Captan / Strawberries

PercentilesConcentration - (parts per million)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8

LEGEND Tolerance is 25 ppm Highest Level Detected is 2.3 ppm

MEAN



### PercentilesConcentration - (parts per million)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8



### PercentilesConcentration - (parts per million)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8

LEGEND Tolerance is 25 ppm Highest Level Detected is 2.3 ppm

MEAN 

# THPI (Captan metabolite) / Strawberries

Appendix N. Page 5 of 6

### PercentilesConcentration - (parts per BILLION)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

LEGEND Tolerance is 1250 ppb Highest Level Detected is 37 ppb

MEAN



### PercentilesConcentration - (parts per BILLION)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20



### PercentilesConcentration - (parts per BILLION)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

LEGEND Tolerance is 1250 ppb Highest Level Detected is 37 ppb

MEAN 

# DDE p,p’ / Heavy Cream

PercentilesConcentration - (parts per BILLION)

30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

LEGEND Tolerance is 8000 ppb Highest Level Detected is 2577 ppb

MEAN



### PercentilesConcentration - (parts per BILLION)

30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800



### PercentilesConcentration - (parts per BILLION)

30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

LEGEND Tolerance is 8000 ppb Highest Level Detected is 2577 ppb

MEAN 

# Malathion / Wheat

Appendix N. Page 6 of 6

# Appendix O

Number of Pesticides Detected per Sample

Appendix O shows the perc entage of samples versus the number of pesticides detected per sample, excludi ng drinking water and the soybean rust/aphid special survey. The graph and data on page 1 showthe overall number of samples and percentages (of total number of samples analyzed) for each detection group across all commodities. The table on page 2 shows th e number of pesticides detected by individual commodity. For the 13,693 sample s analyzed, 33.7 percent of the samples had no detectable pesticides, 29.9 percent had 1 pesticide, and 36.4 percent of the samples had more than 1 pesticide.
This appendix reports t he number of distinct pesticides rather than residues, as was reported in summaries prior to 2003. A parent compound and its metabolites are reported as a single pesticide. For example, a single applicat ion of the pesticide endosulfan may result in residues of t he parent compound endosulfan I, its endosulfan II isomer, and its endosulfan su lfate metabolite. Thus, th ree residue detections could result from the use of a single pesticide. In the 2002 and previous summaries, the corresponding appendix would have counted thes e results as three distinct residues, while this appendix counts the findings as just one distinct pesticide.

## APPENDIX O. SAMPLES vs. NUMBER OF PESTICIDES 1 

## DETECTED PER SAMPLE 2



## 35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0 1 2 3 456789

0 1 2 3 456789
Number of Samples 4,613 4,101 2,449 1,416 655 248 141 46 22 2
Percent of Total Samples 33.7 29.9 17.9 10.3 4.8 1.8 1.0 0.3 0.2 0.02 

## TOTAL NUMBER OF SAMPLES = 13,693

NOTES
1 Parent compounds and their metabolites are combined to report the number of "pesticides" rather than the number of "residues," as was reported in summaries prior to 2003. For example, a sample with positive detections for Endosulfan I, II, and sulfat e would have been counted as three residues detected in the 2002 Appendix L. That same sample would be counted as just one pesticid e detected in this appendix.

2 Excludes drinking water and soybean rust/aphid special survey samples. 

## Number of Pesticides Detected per Sample

N um b er o f P est i c id es D etecte d per S amp l ePercent of Samples 33.7

17.9 29.9

1.8 4.8 10.3

0.02 0.2 0.3 1.0



## Multiple pesticide detections may result from: application of more than one pesticide, spray drift, crop rotation, cross-contamination, and/or indicate the presence of environmental contaminants.

Appendix O. Page 1 of 2Commodity (# of samples) 

## 0123456789 Fresh Fruit and Vegetables:

Apples (743) 2.2 5.1 19.4 27.2 21.3 14.0 8.1 1.9 0.9

-- Cantaloupe (558) 48.4 32.8 14.3 3.2 1.3

-- -- -- -- -- Cauliflower (741) 12.3 71.0 13.6 2.3 0.7 0.1 -- -- -- -- Eggplant (736) 76.6 16.4 6.3 0.5 0.1

-- -- -- -- -- Grapefruit (742) 36.7 45.7 12.5 4.7 0.4

-- -- -- -- -- Grapes (739) 29.6 26.7 20.6 11.4 6.8 2.7 1.8 0.4 0.1 -- Green Beans (181) 8.3 17.1 41.4 23.8 8.3 0.6 0.6

-- -- -- Lettuce (743) 6.3 18.8 23.7 15.5 15.9 7.9 6.1 3.6 1.9 0.3 Oranges (741) 9.6 37.0 37.8 14.3 1.3

-- -- -- -- -- Pears (555) 14.8 42.3 19.3 13.0 8.6 1.1 0.9

-- -- -- Plums (573) 25.7 43.8 23.0 6.3 1.0 0.2

-- -- -- -- Strawberries (737) 7.1 23.1 27.8 22.5 14.2 3.4 1.6 0.3 -- -- Watermelon (182) 61.5 25.3 10.4 2.2 0.5

-- -- -- -- -- Winter Squash (731) 57.2 30.6 8.9 2.7 0.4 0.1

-- -- -- -- 

### Processed Fruit and Vegetables:

Green Beans, Frozen (555) 22.3 43.8 15.7 13.5 3.8 0.7 0.2 -- -- -- Orange Juice (744) 42.2 54.6 2.8 0.3 0.1 -- -- -- -- -- Plums, Dried (153) 86.9 10.5 2.0 0.7

-- -- -- -- -- -- Percent of Total Samples 29.0 33.9 17.6 9.8 5.4 2.2 1.3 0.5 0.2 0.02 Actual Number of Samples 2,947 3,440 1,786 1,000 552 222 137 46 22 2



### Grain Products:

Soybeans (668) 78.4 20.7 0.9

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Wheat (674) 24.6 46.9 21.4 6.8 0.3 -- -- -- -- --
Percent of Total Samples 51.4 33.8 11.2 3.4 0.1 -- -- -- -- -- Actual Number of Samples 690 454 150 46 2 -- -- -- -- -- 

### Dairy Products:

Heavy Cream (369) 0.8 10 43.6 36.6 8.1 0.8 -- -- -- -- Milk (746) 1.1 9.7 45.7 30.6 9.4 3.1 0.5

-- -- -- Percent of Total Samples 1.0 9.8 45.0 32.6 9 2.3 0.4 -- -- -- Actual Number of Samples 11 109 502 363 100 26 4 -- -- --


### Meat Tissues:

Pork, Adipose (352) 88.6 9.7 1.4 0.3 -- -- -- -- -- -- Pork, Muscle (352) 94.9 4.8 0.3

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Percent of Total Samples 91.8 7.2 0.9 0.1 -- -- -- -- -- -- Actual Number of Samples 646 51 6 1 -- -- -- -- -- --


### Water Product:

Bottled Water (378) 84.4 12.4 1.3 1.6 0.3 -- -- -- -- --
Actual Number of Samples 319 47 5 6 1 -- -- -- -- --

NOTES
1 Parent compounds and their metabolites are combined to report the number of "pesticides" rather than the number of "residues."
2 Excludes the 750 drinking water samples and 306 soybean rust/aphid special survey samples. 

## Number of Pesticides 1 

## Detected per Sample 2 

## APPENDIX O. SAMPLES vs. NUMBER OF PESTICIDES DETECTED PER SAMPLE

TOTAL NUMBER OF FRUIT & VEGETABLE SAMPLES = 10,154 

## Percent

Appendix O. Page 2 of 2

# Appendix P

Fruit and Vegetable Samples Reported to FDA as Exceeding the Tolerance or Without Established Tolerance (per Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 180)

Appendix P shows residues reported to FDA as exceeding the tolerance or residues for which no established tolerance was listed under the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 40, Part 180. In 2005, a total of 593 samples with 599 residues were reported to the FDA as Presumptive Tolerance Violations.
A total of 22 fruit and vegetable sample s, 2 pork adipose samples, and 1 soybean sample, were found to have residues at levels exceeding the established tolerance. Fruit and vegetable samples cont aining a residue exceeding an established tolerance included 1 cantaloupe sample, 6 eggplant samples, 4 plum samples, 6 strawberry samples, 1 watermelon sample , and 4 winter squash samples. Of those 25 samples, 8 were reported as imported produce.
In addition, 572 fruit and vegetable sample s were found to have residues for which no tolerance was established.

• 570 samples contained 1 residue for which no tolerance was established.

• 2 samples contained 2 residues for which no tolerance was established.
Four of the 572 samples also contai ned 1 residue each that exceeded an established tolerance.
The columns under the Sample Origin heading provide the number of samples that were of domestic, im port, or unknown origin for ea ch pesticide/commodity pair listed.
Appendix P also notes if me tabolites (or isomers) were detected as part of the same sample. In instances where both parent and metabolite (or isomer) were detected, PDP accounted for both as par t of the same tolerance expression.

## Residues Exceeding Established Tolerance

Commodity / Pesticide Limit of Detection, ppm Concentration Detected, ppm EPA Tolerance Level, ppm Sample Origin



### 1 Cantaloupe / Acephate 0.005 0.21 0.02 U.S.

2 Eggplant / Acephate 0.005 0.3 0.02 U.S.

3 Eggplant / Acephate 0.005 0.27 0.02 U.S.

4 Eggplant / Acephate 0.005 0.13 0.02 U.S.

5 Eggplant / Acephate 0.005 0.12 0.02 U.S.

6 Eggplant / Acephate 0.005 0.07 0.02 U.S.

7 Eggplant / Acephate 0.005 0.055 0.02 U.S.

8 Plums / Chlorpyrifos 0.008 0.12 0.05 Import

9 Plums / Chlorpyrifos 0.008 0.069 0.05 Import

10 Plums / Chlorpyrifos 0.008 0.062 0.05 Import

11 Plums / Esfenvalerate 0.06 0.1 0.05 U.S.

12 Pork, Adipose / 1-Naphthol (Carbaryl metabolite) 3 (ppb) 188 (ppb) 100 (ppb) U.S.

13 Pork, Adipose / Piperonyl butoxide 6 (ppb) 179 (ppb) 100 (ppb) U.S.

14 Soybean Grain / Trifluralin 2 (ppb) 78.1 (ppb) 50 (ppb) U.S.

15 Strawberries / Cyhalothrin, Lambda 0.006 0.14 0.01 U.S.

16 Strawberries / Cyhalothrin, Lambda 0.006 0.036 0.01 U.S.

17 Strawberries / Cyhalothrin, Total (Cyhalothrin-L + R157836 epimer) 0.008 0.17 0.01 U.S.

18 Strawberries / Cyhalothrin, Total (Cyhalothrin-L + R157836 epimer) 0.008 0.046 0.01 U.S.

19 Strawberries / Myclobutanil 0.001 0.69 0.50 U.S.

20 Strawberries / Myclobutanil 0.001 0.63 0.50 U.S.

21 Watermelon / Acephate 0.002 0.71 0.02 Import

22 Winter Squash / Acephate 0.002 0.051 0.02 Import

23 Winter Squash / Methamidophos 0.002 0.17 0.02 Import

24 Winter Squash / Methamidophos 0.004 0.062 0.02 Import

25 Winter Squash / Methamidophos 0.004 0.03 0.02 Import 

## APPENDIX P. SAMPLES REPORTED TO FDA AS EXCEEDING THE TOLERANC E OR WITHOUT ESTABLISHED TOLERANC E (per Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 180)

Appendix P. Page 1 of 3Commodity / Pesticide U.S. Import Unk. 

### 1 Apples 1-Naphthol 54 2 3.7 0.017 - 0.11 0.010 ^ 2 0 0 Chlorpropham 528 1 0.2 0.010 ^ 0.006 ^ 1 0 0 Diflubenzuron 469 23 4.9 0.011 - 0.14 0.007 ^ 23 0 0

2 Cantaloupe Diphenamid 396 1 0.3 0.030 ^ 0.018 ^ 0 1 0 Diphenylamine (DPA) 540 4 0.7 0.014 ^ 0.008 - 0.010 4 0 0

3 Cauliflower Chlorpropham 741 2 0.3 0.010 ^ 0.006 ^ 2 0 0 Dimethomorph 741 2 0.3 0.003 ^ 0.002 ^ 2 0 0 Fenbuconazole 604 4 0.7 0.002 - 0.004 0.0009 ^ 4 0 0 Methiocarb 711 1 0.1 0.001 ^ 0.0006 ^ 1 0 0 o-Phenylphenol 1 

### 741 1 0.1 0.005 ^ 0.003 ^ 1 0 0 Thiabendazole 741 14 1.9 0.0002 - 0.001 0.0001 - 0.0005 13 1 0

4 Eggplant Chlorothalonil 736 10 1.4 0.012 - 0.073 0.007 ^ 9 1 0 o-Phenylphenol 1 

### 1 1 100 0.057 ^ 0.010 ^ 1 0 0

5 Grapefruit Malathion oxygen analog 742 5 0.7 0.002 ^ 0.001 - 0.003 5 0 0

6 Green Beans Chlorpropham 127 1 0.8 0.038 ^ 0.023 ^ 1 0 0 Oxamyl 126 1 0.8 0.10 ^ 0.020 ^ 1 0 0 o-Phenylphenol 1 

### 51 31 60.8 0.017 - 0.020 0.010 ^ 4 27 0

7 Green Beans, Frozen o-Phenylphenol 1 

### 68 68 100 0.017 - 0.095 0.010 ^ 58 10 0

8 Lettuce Atrazine 527 1 0.2 0.006 ^ 0.002 ^ 1 0 0 Carbendazim (MBC) 527 34 6.5 0.0002 - 0.0008 0.0001 - 0.0005 33 1 0 Chlorothalonil 2 2 100 0.013 - 0.20 0.005 - 0.008 2 0 0 Dicofol p,p' 527 1 0.2 0.005 ^ 0.003 ^ 1 0 0 Fenbuconazole 440 1 0.2 0.002 ^ 0.0009 ^ 1 0 0 Linuron 527 2 0.4 0.005 ^ 0.003 ^ 2 0 0 Pentachloroaniline (PCA) 527 1 0.2 0.002 ^ 0.001 ^ 1 0 0 o-Phenylphenol 1 

### 639 80 12.5 0.017 ^ 0.003 - 0.010 78 2 0 Thiabendazole 527 7 1.3 0.0005 - 0.001 0.0005 ^ 7 0 0 Thiamethoxam 527 1 0.2 0.025 ^ 0.015 - 0.050 1 0 0 Trifloxystrobin 118 1 0.8 0.0002 ^ 0.0001 ^ 1 0 0 Sample Origin 

## Distribution of Residues with No Tolerance Listed in 40 CFR, Part 180,

Range of LODs, ppm Number of Samples Samples Reported % of Samples Range of Values Detected, ppm 

## by Commodity/Pesticid e

Appendix P. Page 2 of 3

### i ty / Pesticide U.S. Import Unk.
9 Orange Juice Permethrin cis 2 

### 529 1 0.2 0.020 ^ 0.012 - 0.015 1 0 0 Permethrin trans 2 

### 529 1 0.2 0.020 ^ 0.012 - 0.015 1 0 0

10 Pears 1-Naphthol 90 10 11.1 0.017 - 0.24 0.010 ^ 2 8 0 Chlorothalonil 394 2 0.5 0.004 ^ 0.002 ^ 2 0 0 Chlorpropham 394 1 0.3 0.018 ^ 0.011 ^ 0 0 1 Dicloran 395 1 0.3 0.013 ^ 0.004 - 0.008 1 0 0 Ethion 394 1 0.3 0.13 ^ 0.005 ^ 1 0 0 Iprodione 395 6 1.5 0.038 - 0.39 0.021 - 0.023 1 5 0

11 Strawberries Dimethoate 1 1 100 0.003 ^ 0.002 ^ 1 0 0 Malathion oxygen analog 737 16 2.2 0.002 - 0.030 0.0009 - 0.003 12 4 0 o-Phenylphenol 1 

### 3 3 100 0.017 ^ 0.010 ^ 3 0 0

12 Watermelon o-Phenylphenol 1 

### 123 28 22.8 0.017 ^ 0.010 - 0.015 14 14 0

13 Wheat (in parts per billion) (ppb) (ppb) Methoxychlor p,p' 674 40 5.9 8.0 - 21 5.0 ^ 40 0 0 Pirimiphos methyl 674 22 3.3 5.0 ^ 3.0 ^ 22 0 0 RH 9129 594 4 0.7 8.0 - 81 5.0 ^ 4 0 0

14 Winter Squash Pendimethalin 518 2 0.4 0.027 ^ 0.016 ^ 2 0 0 Phenmedipham 518 4 0.8 0.16 ^ 0.097 ^ 4 0 0 o-Phenylphenol 1 

### 689 128 18.6 0.014 - 0.035 0.008 - 0.010 72 55 1

NOTES

1 o-Phenylphenol is a disinfectant approved for use in food handling establishments, including production facilities for commodities identified above.

2 Permethrin cis and trans isomers were detected within the same sample.

Note: For those pesticide/commodity pairs where the minimum detected value is less than the limit of quantitation (three times the limit of detection), the reported values are estimates. In a few cases, this may apply to the maximum detected value. 

### Range of LODs, ppm Sample Origin Number of Samples Samples Reported % of Samples Range of Values Detected, ppm

Appendix P. Page 3 of 3

# PESTICIDE DATA PROGRAM

Annual Summary Calendar Year 2005
Your satisfaction is very important to us and we welcome your comments and suggestions. Thank you for taking a moment to fill out and return this card.
How would you rate this document on: Good Fair Poor Visual Presentation? 9 9 9 Ease of Readability? 9 9 9 Information Provided? 9 9 9

Comments/ Suggestions: (Attach additional pages if needed)

How did you obtain this copy?

Would you like additional copies? (limit 10 per person, 25 per organization)

# Requested Mailing Address

Would you like to have your name/organization added to our mailing list?



## Mail or Fax to: USDA-AMS-S&T-Monitoring Programs Office 8609 Sudley Road, Suite 206 Manassas, VA 20110

Facsimile: 703-369-0678
Electronic Mail: amsmpo.data@usda.gov