alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1


FIFTH ADDENDUM TO LEASE
DATED JULY 6, 1994, BY AND BETWEEN H-K ASSOCIATES, (LESSOR) AND FOCUS
ENHANCEMENTS, INC., (LESSEE) FOR THE PREMISE LOCATED AT 1370 DELL AVENUE,
CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA.


Whereas Lessee desires to
renew it’s above referenced Lease. Lessor and Lessee agree to modify the
existing Lease with the following changes:


1.     Premise:


Premise consists of approximately 27,500 square feet of a free standing
building.


2.     Term:


The term shall be for Three (3) years and (5) five months, commencing
August 1, 2007 and ending on December 31, 2010.


3.     Rent:


Rent shall be based on a
NNN Lease as per the following:


Aug. 1, 2007 — Dec. 31,
2007  — 
$22,880 per month


Jan. 1, 2008 — Dec. 31,
2008  — 
$0.90 NNN per square foot per month


Jan. 1, 2009 — Dec. 31,
2009  — 
$0.95 NNN per square foot per month


Jan. 1, 2010 — Dec. 31, 2010  —  $1.00
NNN per square foot per month


4.     Security Deposit:


Lessee currently has a Security Deposit on account with Lessor in the
amount of 22,888.00.  On January 1, 2008,
the new Security Deposit shall be $27,500.00. Lessee shall deposit with Lessor
$4,612.00 which sum represents the difference between the existing Security
Deposit and the new Security Deposit.


5.     Right to Renew Lease:


Providing Lessee is not
in default, Lessee shall have the right to renew Lease for one, three year
period beginning January 1, 2011. Lessee shall give Lessor written notice of
its intent to renew, not less than 180 days prior to the expiration of the
Lease. Rent for the renewal period shall be as follows:


Jan. 1, 2011 — Dec. 31,
2011  — 
$1.05 NNN per square foot per year


Jan. 1, 2012 — Dec. 31,
2012  — 
$1.09 NNN per square foot per year


Jan. 1, 2013 — Dec. 31, 2013  —  $1.13
NNN per square foot per year











Page 2 of 2


Addendum to Lease dated July 6,
1994


6.              Cancellation
Option and Buy Out:


Lessee shall have the
option to cancel this Lease, provided, Lessee gives Lessor a minimum of 90 days
written notice prior to canceling said Lease.


The cost to Lessee to
cancel the Lease shall be as follows:


a.               To cancel during
the period of months one (1) through twelve (12), Lessee shall pay to Lessor an
amount equal to six (6) months rent.


b.              To cancel during the
period of months thirteen (13) through (24), Lessee shall pay to Lessor an
amount equal to four (4) months rent.


c.               To cancel during
the period of months twenty five (25) through forty-two (42), Lessee shall pay
to Lessor an amount equal to two (2) months rent.


7.     Occupancy:


Whereas Lessee presently occupies the Premises, Lessee agrees to accept
said Premise in their present condition and state.


Read and Agreed:


	
  H-K Associates

  	
   

  	
  Focus Enhancements, Inc

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By: 

  	
  /s/ Neil Hamm

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  By 

  	
  /s/ Brett Moyer

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Name Printed:

  	
   

  	
  Name Printed:

  
	
  Neil Hamm, G.P.

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Brett Moyer

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Date: 8/1/07

  	
   

  	
  Date: 7/10/07
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ANTIAN DEANDRE SEWELL
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 895

[ January 20, 2022 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County ; Sherwood Bauer, Jr. , Judge; L.T. Case No.

432019CF000686A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Gary Lee Caldwell, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah Koenig,

Assistant Atto rney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN

, C IKLIN
, and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)   In connection with the amended quarterly Report of Hitor Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ending September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Ken Martin, CEO and CAO of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   [exhibit32amended93006002.gif]  _______________________________ Ken Martin, CEO, CAO Dated:  June 12, 2009
#### § 1120.1 Authority.

Under the authority of section 15(j) of the Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA), the Commission determines that consumer products or classes of consumer products listed in § 1120.3 of this part have characteristics whose existence or absence present a substantial product hazard under section 15(a)(2) of the CPSA. The Commission has determined that the listed products have characteristics that are readily observable and have been addressed by a voluntary standard, that the voluntary standard has been effective, and that there is substantial compliance with the voluntary standard. The listed products are subject to the reporting requirements of section 15(b) of the CPSA and to the recall provisions of section 15(c) and (d) of the CPSA, and shall be refused entry into the United States under section 17(a)(4) of the CPSA.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 20, 2004, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Forum on Education Abroad, Inc. (“Forum”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recover of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

                    Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: Forum on Education Abroad, Inc., Northampton, MA. The nature and scope of Forum's standards development activities are: (1) To develop and present voluntary consensus standards for education abroad programs, for domestic colleges and universities and entities in other nations that provide or partner in providing education abroad programs for students from U.S. colleges and universities; and (2) to present                           ( print page 69395)                        standards and methods for assessing performance against the standards that can be used by the smallest and simplest organizations interested in self-improvement, through to the largest and most complex organizations in the education abroad field.                

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-26221 Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4416-11-M
#### § 1105.5 Applications.

Applications must be submitted to the Office of the Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Washington, D.C. 20207, within the time specified by the Commission in its Federal Register notice beginning the development proceeding.
### SUBCHAPTER X—LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)   In connection with the amended quarterly Report of Hitor Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Ken Martin, CEO and CAO of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  [exhibit32amended63008002.gif]   _______________________________ Ken Martin, CEO, CAO Dated:  June 12, 2009
**GAO-02-979R**                      Published: Jul 26, 2002. Publicly Released: Jul 26, 2002.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Status of FY22 Projects 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

GAO reviewed the audit report covering the financial statements of the Boy Scouts of America for fiscal year 2000. GAO found no reportable instances of noncompliance. The audit reports included the auditors' opinions that the financial statements of the corporation were presented fairly in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

## Full Report

Full Report (2 pages)

Accessible Text 

## Office of Public Affairs

### Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

### Public Inquiries

Public Affairs
PublicAffairs@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

Auditing and Financial Management

Audit reportsFederal corporationsFinancial statement auditsAccounting standardsReporting requirementsFinancial statementsFederally chartered corporationFinancial managementRegulatory noncomplianceAuditors
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECURITIES ACT RULES 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14(a)

I, Jon E. Kirchner, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of DTS, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
May 10, 2010

By:

/s/ JON E. KIRCHNER Jon E. Kirchner Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
#### Ida Cohen, Suing, etc., v. Illinois Surety Company.

Motion granted; questions to be settled on settlement of order. Order to be settled on notice. Present —Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 27, 2021

NO. 03-19-00481-CR

Jalen Veliz, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 147TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, TRIANA, AND SMITH

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. Because 

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§1350)





I,
      Michael A. Reisner, Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
      Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of ICON Capital Corp.,
      the Manager of the Registrant in connection with the Quarterly Report of ICON
      Income Fund Ten, LLC (the "LLC") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30,
      2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the "Quarterly Report") certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





1.
            The
                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                13(a) or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m);
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
                all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                the LLC.








*Dated:
      December 11, 2007*





*/s/Michael A. Reisner*


Michael
      A. Reisner


Director,
      Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Manager


(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)


ICON
      Capital Corp.


Manager
      of ICON Income Fund Ten, LLC
Exhibit 14.1

The
Board of Directors
Autonomy Corporation Plc
Cambridge Business Park
Cowley Road
Cambridge
CB4 0WZ

April 20,
2004

Dear
Sirs,

Re: Consent to inclusion of our Audit Opinion

We consent to the incorporation by reference of our audit report dated April 14, 2004, in the Registration Statement of Autonomy Corporation Plc,
Form S-8 (Registration number 333-109842) dated October 20, 2003, appearing in the annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2003.

Yours
faithfully

Deloitte
and Touche LLP

---



QuickLinks
### **CHAPTER 97—ACID PRECIPITATION PROGRAM AND CARBON DIOXIDE STUDY**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—ACID PRECIPITATION

Sec.
8901.
Introductory provisions.
8902.
Comprehensive ten-year program.
8903.
Comprehensive research plan.
8904.
Implementation of comprehensive plan; new or existing regulatory authorities, etc., not granted or modified.
8905.
Authorization of appropriations.
8906.
Updated data base on acid content in precipitation; new monitoring site not required.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—CARBON DIOXIDE

8911.
Comprehensive study of projected impact on atmospheric levels of fossil fuel combustion, etc.
8912.
Authorization of appropriations.
No: 14-060 September 16, 2014

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

NRC Certifies GE-Hitachi New Reactor Design 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission today approved a rule to certify GE-Hitachi Nuclear 

Energy’s Economic Simplified Boiling-Water Reactor (ESBWR) design for use in the United States. 

The rule will go into effect 30 days after its publication in the Federal Register.

The design certification process provides for early public participation and resolution of safety 

issues for proposed reactor designs. NRC certification, in the form of today’s final rule, means the 

ESBWR meets the agency’s applicable safety requirements. If an applicant for a nuclear power plant 

license references a certified design, the applicant need not submit safety information for the design. 

Instead, the license application and the NRC’s safety review would address the remaining site-specific 

safety issues for the proposed nuclear power plant. 

The certified design is fully described in a “design control document,” which is approved 

(incorporated by reference) in the design certification rule. The NRC conducted an extensive technical 

evaluation of the design and issued a safety evaluation report in March 2011. The certification rule 

notice includes discussion of both public comments on a March 2011 proposed rule, as well as 

information in petitions submitted to the NRC after the Fukushima nuclear accident in Japan. 

The NRC supplemented the draft certification rule in May 2014 to account for changes in

analysis of the design’s steam dryer, which prevents excess moisture from damaging a nuclear power 

plant’s electricity-generating turbine. NRC reviewers asked for additional steam dryer information from 

GE-Hitachi between 2011 and 2013. The staff’s examination of that information led to the supplement, 

which also formally incorporated several dozen reference documents as requirements in the draft 

certification rule. The NRC received no comments on the supplemental rule.

GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy submitted its application for ESBWR certification on Aug. 24, 

2005. The ESBWR is a 1,594 megawatt electric, natural circulation reactor. The design includes 

passive safety features that would cool down the reactor after an accident without the need for human 

intervention. These passive features include: 

• enhanced natural circulation via a taller reactor vessel, a shorter core and improved water 

flow through the vessel; 

• an isolation condenser system to control water levels and remove decay heat while the 

reactor is pressurized, and; 
Page | 2

• a gravity-driven cooling system to maintain water levels when the reactor pressure has 

dropped. 

More information about the ESBWR design review can be found on the NRC’s website. The 

NRC is currently reviewing two Combined License applications referencing the GEH design. Detroit 

Edison Company is seeking a license for Fermi Unit 3 in Monroe County, Mich., and Dominion is 

seeking a license for North Anna Unit 3 in Louisa County, Va. The NRC has certified four other 

standard reactor designs: the Advanced Boiling Water Reactor, System 80+, AP600, and AP1000.
No: IV-14-001 January 15, 2014

CONTACT: Victor Dricks, 817-200-1128

Lara Uselding, 817-200-1519

NRC to Meet with Officials from Wolf Creek Nuclear Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with officials of the Wolf Creek Nuclear 

Operating Corp. on Jan. 22 to discuss the licensee’s progress in addressing safety conscious work 

environment concerns. The plant is located north of Burlington, Kan. 

The meeting, which will be open to public observation, will be held from 1-3 p.m. in the NRC’s 

Region IV office at 1600 East Lamar Blvd., Arlington, Texas. Members of the public can also listen to 

the meeting by calling 1-888-566-5789. 

On Aug. 19, 2013, following inspections and interviews with plant workers, the NRC issued 

chilling effect letter after determining a “chilled work environment” exists within the Quality Assurance 

(QA) group at the plant. A chilled work environment is one in which workers are hesitant to raise safety 

concerns for fear of retaliation.

The company responded with a letter a month later outlining actions it is taking to address the 

concerns and ensure they facilitate a strong safety conscious work environment. At the meeting, 

company officials will provide an update on their progress.

On May 15, 2013, the U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety & Health 

Administration (OSHA) found that Enercon, a Wolf Creek contractor, fired a worker for raising 

concerns with how work was being performed at Wolf Creek.

The NRC considered OSHA’s finding and decided to issue the chilling effect letter as the firing 

might affect the willingness of other workers to speak up on nuclear-related projects at the plant. In 

order to ensure safe operations at a plant, it is imperative that workers feel encouraged to raise safety 

concerns.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-14-0117:  Radiation Protection Code Analysis and Maintenance Program

Accession Number: ML14204A795

Date Released: Wednesday, November 12, 2014

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML14204A698 - SECY-14-0117:  The Radiation Protection Computer Code Analysis and Maintenance Program (6 page(s), 10/24/2014)
    - ML14204A793 - SECY-14-0117:  Enclosure 1 - Codes in the Radiation Protection Code Analysis and Maintenance Program (6 page(s), 10/24/2014)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
### SUBCHAPTER X—RE-SCOPING AND REVITALIZING INSTITUTIONAL CAPABILITIES