alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Marion Sakow, Suing Derivatively on Behalf of Columbia Bagel, Inc., Appellant, v Columbia Bagel, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[822 NYS2d 5]

*690Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Robert D. Lippmann, J.), entered March 4, 2005, which, to the extent appealed from, directed that nonparty appellant Robson is jointly and severally liable with plaintiff to pay 22 NYCRR subpart 130-1 sanctions to defendants in the total amount of $118,456, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with costs, and the sanction vacated.

Upon review, we find that although counsel could have been more careful or attentive in matters of pretrial preparation, none of his conduct was completely without legal merit, undertaken primarily to delay or prolong the litigation or to harass or maliciously injure another, or asserted material factual statements that are false (22 NYCRR 130-1.1 [c]). For instance, we cannot find that plaintiff and her attorney intentionally protracted the case while lacking a good faith belief in the merit of the action. Indeed, until the evidentiary rulings made shortly before trial, they were confident in their case *(cf. Proficient Food Co. v Phoenix Partners,*6 AD3d 168 [2004]). Nor is there a proper basis to conclude that they intentionally prepared and tendered altered exhibits. To the extent counsel proceeded with incomplete or improper exhibits, we do not find his conduct sanctionable. Counsel’s conduct in belatedly providing notice of his planned expert testimony, and his ultimate inability to offer that testimony, similarly falls outside the definition of sanction-able behavior *(cf. Parametric Capital Mgt., LLC v Lacher,*26 AD3d 175 [2006]). Concur — Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Williams and McGuire, JJ.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 15

- 00037

- CR

Alberto Alba Villarreal

v. The State of Texas

On a ppeal from the 445th District Court of Cameron County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2013

- DCR

- 3189

- I

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having consider ed this cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed in part (Count II)
and reversed and rendered in part (Count I) . The Court orders the judgment of the trial
court AFFIRMED IN PART (COUNT II) and REVERSE D AND RENDER ED IN PART (COUNT I)

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. October 20 , 2016
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection  with the Annual Report of Eureka  Financial  Corp,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form  10-QSB  for the  quarter  ended  June 30,  2004  (the
"Report")  as filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date
hereof, we, Edward F. Seserko,  President and Chief Executive Officer,  and Gary
B. Pepper,  Executive  Vice  President  and Chief  Financial  Officer,  certify,
pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  August 13, 2004




/s/Edward F. Seserko                                /s/Gary B. Pepper
-------------------------------------               ----------------------------
Edward F. Seserko                                   Gary B. Pepper
President and Chief Executive Officer               Executive Vice President and
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
### §10342. Research program

The Director of the National Science Foundation shall establish a basic research program on membranes and membrane processes. Such program may be carried out through awarding grants, entering into contracts or cooperative agreements, or direct research.

(Pub. L. 102–490, §3, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3142.)
### SUBCHAPTER V—IDENTIFICATION AND USE OF SURPLUS FEDERAL PROPERTY
Exhibit 32.1


Certification Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350


by Chief Executive Officer




In connection with the Quarterly Report of VSB Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Raffaele M. Branca, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May 11, 2010/s/ Raffaele M. BrancaRaffaele M. BrancaPresident and CEO




A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 228 (Monday, November 29, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 69378]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26255]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Arthritis and 
Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Review of 
Research Scientist Development Award--Research & Training (K01's), 
Conference (R13's), and Institutional National Research Service 
Award (T32's).
    Date: December 10, 2004.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Double Tree Hotel, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 
20852.
    Contact Person: Guo HE Zhang, PhD, MD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal 
and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy 
Boulevard, Suite 800, Bethesda, MD 20817, (301) 451-6524, 
[email protected].

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, 
Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 18, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-26255 Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
§ 970.202 Statement of technological experience and capabilities. ( a ) *General.* The application must contain information sufficient to demonstrate to the Administrator the technological capability of the applicant to carry out, in accordance with the regulations contained in this part, the exploration program set out in the applicant's exploration plan. It must contain sufficient information for the Administrator to make a determination on the applicant's technological capability pursuant to § 970.402.
( b ) *Contents.* In particular, the information submitted pursuant to this section must demonstrate knowledge and skills which the applicant either possesses or to which he can demonstrate access. The information must include: ( 1 ) A description of the exploration equipment to be used by the applicant in carrying out the exploration program;
( 2 ) A description of the environmental monitoring equipment to be used by the applicant in monitoring the environmental effects of the exploration program; and
( 3 ) The experience on which the applicant will rely in using this or similar equipment.
#### § 1021.2 Policy.

It is the policy of the Commission to weigh and consider the effects upon the human environment of a proposed action and its reasonable alternatives. Actions will be designed to avoid or minimize adverse effects upon the quality of the human environment wherever practicable.
### SUBCHAPTER III—FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT FOOD AND SHELTER PROGRAM
NRC FORM 366B

(04-02-2024)

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) 

(FAILURE CONTINUATION)

APPROVED BY OMB: NO. 3150-0104 EXPIRES: 04/30/2027

Estimated burden per response to comply with this mandatory collection request: 80 hours. Reported 

lessons learned are incorporated into the licensing process and fed back to industry. Send comments 

regarding burden estimate to the FOIA, Library, and Information Collections Branch (T-6 A10M), U. S. 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, or by email to 

Infocollects.Resource@nrc.gov, and the OMB reviewer at: OMB Office of Information and Regulatory 

Affairs, (3150-0104), Attn: Desk Officer for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 725 17th Street NW, 

Washington, DC 20503. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to 

respond to, a collection of information unless the document requesting or requiring the collection 

displays a currently valid OMB control number.

(See NUREG-1022, R.3 for instruction and guidance for completing this form 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1022/r3/)

- -

3. LER NUMBER

REV 

NO.

SEQUENTIAL 

NUMBER

YEAR

1. FACILITY NAME 2. DOCKET NUMBER

13. COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT

CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER REPORTABLE TO IRIS

NRC FORM 366B (04-02-2024) Page of

052

050
No: I-14-032 July 31, 2014

 CONTACT: Diane Screnci 610-337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan 610-337-5331 

NRC Imposes Civil Penalty Against Rhode Island Firm 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is imposing an $8,400 civil penalty against a Riverside, 

R.I., company for failing to receive the appropriate approvals from the NRC before performing work on 

numerous occasions at both a federal facility in Rhode Island and in Connecticut.

The NRC on March 20 proposed a fine of $11,200 for Geisser Engineering Corp. (GEC) but has 

now reduced that total.

Rhode Island is an “Agreement State,” which means that under an agreement with the NRC, it 

oversees the use of nuclear materials within its borders that otherwise would be regulated by the NRC. 

However, such activities performed at federal facilities within Agreement States, as well as at any sites 

in Non-Agreement States, are under the jurisdiction of the NRC and therefore must be approved by the 

agency. The approval process is known as “reciprocity.”

The NRC determined that GEC willfully failed to adhere to that reciprocity requirement and 

used portable nuclear gauges in areas of federal jurisdiction. Specifically, between Oct. 21, 2009 and 

June 23, 2011, the company performed work at the Newport Naval Station in Newport, R.I., an area of 

exclusive federal jurisdiction, and in Connecticut, a non-Agreement State, without filing for reciprocity 

with the NRC prior to conducting the activities. In total, GEC failed to file for reciprocity on 22 

occasions.

In correspondence dated April 15, GEC requested relief from the proposed NRC civil penalty 

stating the proposed enforcement action, along with a penalty issued by Massachusetts for a violation 

involving the company’s failure to file for reciprocity prior to performing work in the state, would 

create a financial hardship.

GEC is required to pay the civil penalty or request a hearing within 30 days.
| + NASA Homepage+ NASA en Español+ Marte en Español+ Mars Home+ MER Home**Press Kits** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### § 1018.43 Comprehensive review.

A comprehensive review of all Commission established or utilized advisory committees shall be made annually in accordance with section 10 of the GSA Circular No. A-63, as amended, and shall be submitted to the GSA Secretariat by November 30 of each year.

[41 FR 45882, Oct. 18, 1976, as amended at 46 FR 63249, Dec. 31, 1981]
### §1711. Value engineering

Each executive agency shall establish and maintain cost-effective procedures and processes for analyzing the functions of a program, project, system, product, item of equipment, building, facility, service, or supply of the agency. The analysis shall be—

(1) performed by qualified agency or contractor personnel; and

(2) directed at improving performance, reliability, quality, safety, and life cycle costs.

(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3718.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1711 | 41:432. | Pub. L. 93–400, §36, as added Pub. L. 104–106, title XLIII, §4306(a), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 665. |

Section
No: III-14-001 January 2, 2014

CONTACT: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663

NRC Schedules Regulatory Conference to Discuss Apparent Violation at 

Duane Arnold Nuclear Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a regulatory conference with officials 

of NextEra Energy Duane Arnold, LLC, on Tuesday, Jan. 7, to discuss a preliminary finding in the 

reactor safety area. The plant is located in Palo, Iowa, 8 miles northwest of Cedar Rapids.

NRC and company officials will discuss the significance of the inspection finding, which 

involved failing to perform an immediate operability determination. This failure delayed identification 

of an inoperable cooling system for the plant. The finding is not a current safety concern. 

The meeting is scheduled for 1-4 p.m. in the NRC’s Region III office, located at 2443 

Warrenville Road, in Lisle, Ill. The public is invited to observe and NRC officials will be available to 

answer questions. 

The NRC evaluates regulatory performance at commercial nuclear power plants with a colorcoded system that classifies findings as green, white, yellow or red, in increasing order of safety 

significance. The NRC’s preliminary evaluation determined that the violation at Duane Arnold was 

white, which means it has a low to moderate safety significance. 

No decisions on the final safety significance or other NRC actions will be made at the 

conference. Those decisions will be made by NRC officials at a later time. 

The NRC inspection report in which the apparent violation is documented is publicly available.
No. II-10-009 March 19, 2010 

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 562-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 562-4416 

NRC TO DISCUSS 2009 PERFORMANCE OF 

FARLEY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a meeting for Tuesday, 

March 30, with representatives of Southern Nuclear Operating Co. to discuss the agency’s 

assessment of safety performance during 2009 at the Farley nuclear power plant. The plant, 

operated by Southern Nuclear, is 18 miles southeast of Dothan in south Alabama. 

The meeting, which will be open to the public, is scheduled to begin with an open house 

at 6:30 p.m. CDT, followed by a brief presentation at 7 p.m. The meeting will be held at the 

Hilton Garden Inn, 171 Hospitality Lane in Dothan. 

Before and after the presentation, NRC staff will be available to answer questions on the 

safety performance of the Farley plant, as well as the NRC role in ensuring safe plant operation. 

“We inspect and review the performance of the Farley plant and all other commercial 

nuclear plants throughout the year,” NRC Region II Administrator Luis Reyes said. “This 

meeting gives us an opportunity to discuss the plant’s safety performance with the company, 

local officials and citizens interested in the plant.” 

A letter sent from the NRC Region II office to plant officials addresses the performance 

of the plant during 2009 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on 

the NRC web site at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/far_2009q4.pdf. 

The NRC found that Farley’s 2009 performance met all NRC safety objectives. There 

were findings during the year, however, that prompted additional inspections beyond the scope 

of those considered routine or baseline. One inspection, completed in February, was related to 

the plant being cited for failure to properly maintain the system for communicating with all 

nearby residents in the event of an emergency. This supplemental inspection found no significant 

weaknesses. 

 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov 
Current performance information for Farley Unit 1 is available on the NRC web site at: 

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/FAR1/far1_chart.html. Current performance 

information for Unit 2 is at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/FAR2/far2_chart.html. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

In connection with the report of Nano-Jet Corp.(the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2007, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Ken Martin, ChiefFinancial Officer and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to myknowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany. 

Ken Martin, Chief Financial Officer and

Chief Executive Officer

Dated: August 20, 2007
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. §1350

I,
David H. Fleischman, Chief Financial Officer of TradeStation Group, Inc., hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

The Annual
Report on Form 10-K of TradeStation Group, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TradeStation Group, Inc.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



|               |  |                                                                 
|-------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|March 11, 2011 |  | /s/ David H. Fleischman                                         
|Date           |  | David H. Fleischman                                             
|               |  | Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of Finance and Treasurer
### **CHAPTER 58—DISASTER RELIEF**
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# May 2013 Report on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of The Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206.

Accession Number: ML13154A422

Date Released: Wednesday, June 12, 2013

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML13154A424 - May 2013 Report on the Status of Public Petitions under Titled 10 CFR 2.206. (3 page(s), 6/12/2013)
    - ML13154A425 - Enclosure - May 2013, 2.206 Status of Public Petitions. (26 page(s), 6/12/2013)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### § 880.301 Purpose.

This subpart establishes OPM's policy concerning the availability and amount of CSRS and FERS annuity payments and the continuation of FEHBP and FEGLI coverage and premiums while an annuitant is classified as a missing annuitant.
#### § 80.5 Detrimental use of information.

Section 8 of Title 13, United States Code requires that,

In no case shall information furnished under the authority of this section be used to the detriment of the persons to whom such information relates.

[40 FR 53232, Nov. 17, 1975]
| 1. | Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-104426 and 333-59058) pertaining to Global Sources Equity Compensation Plans Numbers I, II, III, IV, V, VI and VII of Global Sources Ltd.; |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-138474) pertaining to Global Sources Equity Compensation (2007) Master Plan and Global Sources Ltd. Directors Purchase Plan (as of November 5, 2005); |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | Registration Statement (Form F-3/A No. 333-114411) pertaining to the prospectus of Global Sources Ltd; and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4. | Registration Statement (Form F-3 No. 333-154960) pertaining to the prospectus of Global Sources Ltd. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|