alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 930.63 State agency objection to a consistency certification. ( a ) If the State agency objects to the applicant's consistency certification within six months following commencement of review, it shall notify the applicant, Federal agency and Director of the objection. A State agency may assert alternative bases for its objection, as described in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
( b ) State agency objections that are based on sufficient information to evaluate the applicant's consistency certification shall describe how the proposed activity is inconsistent with specific enforceable policies of the management program. The objection may describe alternative measures (if they exist) which, if adopted by the applicant, may permit the proposed activity to be conducted in a manner consistent with the enforceable policies of the management program.
( c ) A State agency objection may be based upon a determination that the applicant has failed, following a written State agency request, to supply the information required pursuant to § 930.58 or other information necessary for the State agency to determine consistency. If the State agency objects on the grounds of insufficient information, the objection shall describe the nature of the information requested and the necessity of having such information to determine the consistency of the activity with the management program. The objection may describe alternative measures (if they exist) which, if adopted by the applicant, may permit the proposed activity to be conducted in a manner consistent with the enforceable policies of the management program.
( d ) *Alternatives.* If a State agency proposes an alternative(s) in its objection letter, the alternative(s) shall be described with sufficient specificity to allow the applicant to determine whether to, in consultation with the State agency: adopt an alternative; abandon the project; or file an appeal under subpart H. Application of the specificity requirement demands a case specific approach. More complicated activities or alternatives generally need more information than less-complicated activities or alternatives. See § 930.121(c) for further details regarding alternatives for appeals under subpart H of this part.
( e ) A State agency objection shall include a statement to the following effect:
Pursuant to 15 CFR part 930, subpart H, and within 30 days from receipt of this letter, you may request that the Secretary of Commerce override this objection. In order to grant an override request, the Secretary must find that the activity is consistent with the objectives or purposes of the Coastal Zone Management Act, or is necessary in the interest of national security. A copy of the request and supporting information must be sent to the [Name of State] management program and the federal permitting or licensing agency. The Secretary may collect fees from you for administering and processing your request.
[65 FR 77154, Dec. 8, 2000, as amended at 71 FR 828, Jan. 5, 2006]
### ' S li0&l!nOS3a? l / LINDSE Y O . GRAHA M 

# %llv ^ UNITE D STATE S SENAT E

Augus t 25 . 201( 1 Sccreuiry Ka

y II . I.alloo d Unite dSlaic s DcparliiK-ni orTransportatiti n 1200 No w .Jerse

y Avenue . SI.

- Washington. D C 2059 0 Dea rSeerciarvLaHoocI : er a

r o > o o o 

## oo o o o 1 understanc l tlia

i yo u wil l .soo

n b e niak'uiL ! decision. s o n jiran i awards . Colunihi aMetropolita n Airport (Columbia , South CaroHna ) ha s suhuiilie dagrnu l fo r th e Departmen t

ofTransptination' s Stmil l Commwiif

y Ai r Servic e Devclapmei U Orcm t App/iaiiiin i fOST-2(}l()-()I2-i) . I believ e thi s t o b e aworth ) projce l ati dI wnul das k tha t you iiiv o i

t liill Lonsiileraiio n unde r al l apjiropriai e guideline s an dregulations . Th e Columbi aMeiropolilai i Aiqw n (CAII ) SCITC S mor e tha n 1.2 millio n passenger s an d processe s mor e than I68;00 0 ton s ol'airearg o annually . I t ha s appro.\inuuel y 5 0 agencie s an d businesse s locate do n ili e airpor t properly . Ai r

passenge r

an dcarg o servic e i s provide dby schedule dairlines , je t

treigli l carriers , tw o live dba.se operait>rs . luxi l variou s charie r

(lights . .Ai

r operation s are conducte do n a n <S60l) " \150 ' runway an da

n SOUO " .\150 ' runway . Th e Columbi a Metropolita n Airpor t

Commissio n i s .seekin g t o expan dcurren t service s by attractin g alow-eos t carrie r t o th e area . C.AI; ! wa s recentl y awartle dagran t IVo mth e Departmen t

o f Transporialio n t o complet e runwa y repair s an dtbc v hav e bee n successru l i n addin g llighl s int o th e are asinc e ihai time . The y no w see k

t o furthe r

expan dserviee s an dolTuring s by bringin g alow-eos t carrie r t o ih e midland s are aofSoul h Carolina . Thank yo u lo r you r assistanc e wit

h thi s mailer . I

T I ean provid e additiona l inlbrniation , pleas e d o no t hesitat e l o contac t

me . Sincerely . LindscjNp . Graha m Unite dSinte s Senato r

it\ S MAvrior . ^iiii i I ;;i..i r 10 ? COi-.-v:'i . S C 73X1 1 IGC.-|?J3-0-.i : ;;i'TT r11 1 l.lIlRiiiliMf.U. n Pini l T Su m ") U iB>:i;;'.i-;ii 7 ir.'. n Ilii|-.,1 3 tJl,i; i 1 v» l !;i;ir i 11 ? f;cci-nii , E C 7'jn o
Buried Piping Integrity Initia

Revision

Maria Korsnick, Constellation

September 21, 2010
Proposed Revision to Initiativ

 Buried Piping Integrity Initiative adopt

November 18, 2009

 Buried Piping Integrity Initiative applies t

piping that is in direct contact with the so

 Experience since then indicates that a re

to the Initiative should be considered
Why Revise the Initiative?

 Operating experience

– Degradation of piping in vaults and tunne

occur

 Original Initiative does not include tanks

– Include for completeness Include for completeness
Expansion of Initiative Scop

 Add

– Underground piping not in contact with – Underground tanks– If the

y g are outside of buildin

gs and

• Contain licensed radioactive material o• Are safety related 

 Identify the new Initiative and the origin

Initiative as the “Underground Piping aTank Integrity Initiative”
Milestones

 Applicable to the added scope

1. Procedures and oversight by December 32. Prioritization by June 30, 20123. Condition assessment p y lan b December 

2012

4. Plan implementation by June 30, 20135. Condition assessment of components co

licensed material by June 30, 2014

6. Asset management plan by December 31
Current Status

 Proposed Underground Piping and Ta

Integrity Initiative approved by the NucStrategic Issues Advisory Committee iSeptember 2010 

 A revision to NEI 09-14, Guideline for t

Management of Buried Piping Integritybeing prepared
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T17:28:19-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
### §126. Reports to Congress

The Administrator of General Services, at times the Administrator considers desirable, shall submit a report to Congress on the administration of this subtitle. The report shall include any recommendation for amendment of this subtitle that the Administrator considers appropriate and shall identify any law that is obsolete because of the enactment or operation of this subtitle.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1071.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 126 | 40:492. | June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title II, §212, formerly §210, 63 Stat. 393; renumbered §212, Sept. 5, 1950, ch. 849, §5(a), 64 Stat. 580. |

Section

The words "in January of each year and" are omitted pursuant to section 3003 of the Federal Reports Elimination and Sunset Act of 1995 (31 U.S.C. 1113 note). See, also, page 174 of House Document No. 103–7.
### §7474. Consultation

The Under Secretary for Health shall carry out this subchapter after consultation with the special medical advisory group established pursuant to section 7312(a) of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §401(b)(5), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 238; amended Pub. L. 102–405, title III, §302(c)(1), Oct. 9, 1992, 106 Stat. 1984.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 4124 of this title prior to the repeal of that section as part of the complete revision of chapter 73 of this title by Pub. L. 102–40.

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–405 substituted "Under Secretary for Health" for "Chief Medical Director".
null

269.03845
No: 13-066 August 12, 2013

CONTACT: Dave McIntyre, 301-415-8200 

NRC Public Meetings to Discuss Environmental Reviews of 

Byron, Braidwood Nuclear Plant License Renewals

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold public meetings Aug. 20 and Aug. 21 near the 

Byron and Braidwood nuclear power plants in Illinois to discuss the agency’s environmental reviews of 

the plants’ proposed license renewal.

Meetings for the Byron Station environmental review will be held Aug. 20 at the Byron Forest 

Preserve, 7993 N. River Road, in Byron. Meetings for the Braidwood environmental review will be 

held Aug. 21 at the Fossil Ridge Public Library, 386 W. Kennedy Road, in Braidwood. On each date, 

sessions will be held from 2-4 p.m. and 7-9 p.m., with NRC staff explaining the review process and 

taking comments from the public about the scope of the reviews.

Exelon Generation Co. filed an application, dated May 29, seeking to renew the operating 

licenses of the two plants for an additional 20 years of operation. The Braidwood Nuclear Station, 

located 20 miles southwest of Joliet, and the Byron Nuclear Station, located 17 miles southwest of 

Rockford, each have two pressurized-water reactors. The current operating licenses for Braidwood 

expire on Oct. 17, 2026, for Unit 1 and Dec. 18, 2027, for Unit 2. The licenses for Byron expire Oct. 

31, 2024, for Unit 1 and Nov. 6, 2026, for Unit 2. 

Exelon, in submitting a single application to cover both plants, cited extensive similarities in the 

systems, structures and components of each that are analyzed in a license renewal review. The NRC 

will conduct separate environmental reviews because of differences in environmental and cultural 

resources surrounding the plants. 

Members of the public wishing to submit comments in writing on the scope of the 

environmental reviews may do so at the federal government’s rulemaking website, 

www.regulations.gov, using Docket ID NRC-2013-0178 for Byron and Docket ID NRC-2013-0169 for 

Braidwood. They may also be mailed (using the same docket IDs) to Cindy Bladey, Chief, Rules, 

Announcements and Directives Branch (RADB), Office of Administration, Mail Stop: 3WFN 

06A44M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC 20555-0001. Comments on both 

reviews will be accepted through Sept. 27.
#### In the Matter of Brian M.R.C., an Infant. Erie County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Heidi T., Respondent. Lawrence F. Korzeniewski, Esq., as Law Guardian, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[820 NYS2d 838]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Patricia A. Maxwell, J.), entered January 23, 2006 in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b. The order set forth the terms and conditions of a four-month suspended judgment.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs *(see Matter of Cherilyn P., 192*AD2d 1084 [1993], *lv denied*82 NY2d 652 [1993]; *see also*CPLR 5511). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Kehoe, Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****ECO-news**
 
1995 | 1996 | 1997| 1998 | 1999
2000 | 2001-02 | 2002-03 | 2003-04 | 2005 | 2007 | 2008
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.139:
Item Number:0084-A-06 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000554439
 
February 7, 2020
Electrpnic Code of Federal Regulations: Page 1 of 1 

Runaround scrap means scrap materials generated on-site by aluminum casting, extruding, rolling, scalping, 

forging, forminglstamping, cutting, and trimming operations and that do not contain paint or solid coatings. 

Uncoatedlunpainted aluminum chips generated by turning, boring, milling, and similar machining operations may 

be clean charge if they have been thermally dried or treated by a centrifugal cleaner, but are not considered to 

be runaround scrap.
### **CHAPTER 76—AGE DISCRIMINATION IN FEDERALLY ASSISTED PROGRAMS**

Sec.
6101.
Statement of purpose.
6102.
Prohibition of discrimination.
6103.
Regulations.
6104.
Enforcement.
6105.
Judicial review.
6106.
Study of discrimination based on age.
6106a.
Reports to the Secretary and Congress.
6107.
Definitions.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODEIn connection with the Annual Report of Stratos International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-K for the period ended April 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Barry Hollingsworth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.July 29, 2005         /s/ Barry Hollingsworth   Barry Hollingsworth    Chief Financial Officer   
94
#### Eliza J. Chalmers and Others v. National Cash Register Company.

*907Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 17, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 67360]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25453]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than December 10, 2004.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Patrick Wilder, Assistant Vice 
President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. QCR Holdings, Inc., Moline, Illinois; to acquire 100 percent of 
the voting shares of Rockford Bank and Trust Company, Rockford, 
Illinois (in organization).

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 10, 
2004.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 04-25453 Filed 11-16-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
# Dziennik Urzędowy C 391/2020

| | ISSN 1977-1002 |
| --- | --- |
| Dziennik Urzędowy
  Unii Europejskiej | C 391 |
| | |
| Wydanie polskie | Informacje i zawiadomienia | Rocznik 6316 listopada 2020 |

ISSN 1977-1002

Dziennik Urzędowy

Unii Europejskiej

C 391

Wydanie polskie

Informacje i zawiadomienia

Rocznik 6316 listopada 2020

---

| Spis treści | Strona |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informacje |
| | INFORMACJE INSTYTUCJI, ORGANÓW I JEDNOSTEK ORGANIZACYJNYCH UNII EUROPEJSKIEJ |
| | Rada |
| 2020/C 391/01 | Decyzja Rady z dnia 10 listopada 2020 r. w sprawie powołania prezesa izb odwoławczych Urzędu Unii Europejskiej ds. Własności Intelektualnej | 1 |

Spis treści

Strona

IV   Informacje

INFORMACJE INSTYTUCJI, ORGANÓW I JEDNOSTEK ORGANIZACYJNYCH UNII EUROPEJSKIEJ

Rada

2020/C 391/01

Decyzja Rady z dnia 10 listopada 2020 r. w sprawie powołania prezesa izb odwoławczych Urzędu Unii Europejskiej ds. Własności Intelektualnej

1

---

| PL | |
| --- | --- |

PL

---

IV Informacje

INFORMACJE INSTYTUCJI, ORGANÓW I JEDNOSTEK ORGANIZACYJNYCH UNII EUROPEJSKIEJ

Rada

| 16.11.2020 | PL | Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej | C 391/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2020

PL

Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej

C 391/1

---

DECYZJA RADY

z dnia 10 listopada 2020 r.

w sprawie powołania prezesa izb odwoławczych Urzędu Unii Europejskiej ds. Własności Intelektualnej

(2020/C 391/01)

RADA UNII EUROPEJSKIEJ,

uwzględniając Traktat o funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej,

uwzględniając rozporządzenie Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) 2017/1001 z dnia 14 czerwca 2017 r. w sprawie znaku towarowego Unii Europejskiej (1), w szczególności jego art. 166 ust. 1,

a także mając na uwadze, co następuje:

w dniu 8 czerwca 2020 r. Rada otrzymała od Zarządu Urzędu Unii Europejskiej ds. Własności Intelektualnej (EUIPO) listę kandydatów zaproponowanych na stanowisko prezesa izb odwoławczych EUIPO,

PRZYJMUJE NINIEJSZĄ DECYZJĘ:

Artykuł 1

1.   João Nuno MAROCO AMARAL NEGRÃO, urodzony w Lizbonie (Portugalia) w dniu 2 listopada 1970 r. zostaje niniejszym powołany na stanowisko prezesa izb odwoławczych Urzędu Unii Europejskiej ds. Własności Intelektualnej (EUIPO) na pięcioletnią kadencję.

2.   Zarząd EUIPO ustala dzień rozpoczęcia pięcioletniej kadencji, o której mowa w ust. 1.

Artykuł 2

Niniejsza decyzja wchodzi w życie z dniem jej opublikowania w Dzienniku Urzędowym Unii Europejskiej.

Sporządzono w Brukseli dnia 10 listopada 2020 r.

W imieniu Rady

M. ROTH

Przewodniczący

---

(1)  Dz.U. L 154 z 16.6.2017, s. 1.

1

---
#### In the Matter of Mackson P. McDowall, a Suspended Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee of the Eighth Judicial District, Petitioner.

[820 NYS2d 919]

Order of disbarment entered. Same per curiam as in *Matter of McDowall*(33 AD3d 246 [2006]). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Kehoe, Martoche and Smith, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Patchogue Medford Union Free School District, Petitioner, v Stephen L. Braslow, as Judge of the Suffolk County Court, Respondent.

[820 NYS2d 524]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to prohibit the enforcement of an order of the respondent, Stephen L. Braslow, a Judge of the County Court, Suffolk County, dated March 3, 2006, in a criminal action entitled *People v Conwell,*pending in the County Court, Suffolk County, under indictment No. 256-2006, which directed the petitioner to provide the defendant therein,' Christopher Conwell, with six hours of education per day, from Monday to Friday.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

“Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court — in cases where judicial authority is challenged — acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers” *(Matter of Holtzman v Goldman,*71 NY2d 564, 569 [1988]; *see Matter of Rush v Mordue,*68 NY2d 348, 352 [1986]). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Crane, J.P., Goldstein, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32

Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, Darwin L. Stump, the Chief Financial Officer of Petroleum Development Corporation, the managing general partner of PDC 2002-C Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"),  hereby certify that: 

- I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Partnership (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;
- the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

__ /s/ Darwin L. Stump                  

Name: Darwin L. Stump

Title: Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 12, 2003
#### Thomas Woods, Respondent, v. Elmer Smith, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Martin, P. J., taking no part.
### SUBCHAPTER I—MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Tommie L. Calvin, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 73-266;

Fifth District

July 23, 1974.

Robert E. Farrell and Richard Thomas, both of the State Appellate Defenders Office, of Mt. Vernon, for appellant.

Howard Hood, States Attorney, of Murphysboro (Ralph J. Mendel-sohn, of Illinois Model State’s Attorneys Support Unit, of counsel, and Darrell L. Conley), for the People.

Opinion by

Mr. JUSTICE EBERSPACHER.
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Paul Weight, a/k/a James E. Council (Impleaded), Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 58971;

First District (2nd Division)

August 6, 1974.

James J. Doherty, Public Defender, of Chicago (Leonard V. Solomon, Assistant Public Defender, of counsel), for appellant.

Bernard Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago (Kenneth L. Gillis and Dennis J. O’Hara, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel), for the People.

PER CURIAM.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Russell C. Horowitz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Marchex, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2009
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Marchex, Inc.



|                       |  |  |  |        |  |                           
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | --------------------------
|Date: November 9, 2009 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/    RUSSELL C.
HOROWITZ
|                       |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Russell C. Horowitz       
|                       |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer