alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

De cember 30, 2020

No. 04

- 20

- 00494

- CV

AMERICAN MEDICAL HOME HEALTH SERVICES, LLC , Hub City Home Health, Inc. d/b/a American Medical Home Health Services, American Medical Home Health Services San Antonio, LLC, American Medical Hospice Care, LLC, American Me dical Palliative Support,

LLC, Magdalena (Maggie) Clemente, Rene Estrada, and Gina Trevino, Appellants

v.

LEGACY HOME HEALTH AGENCY, INC . and Legacy Home Care Services, Inc. d/b/a All Seasons Home Care, Inc., Appellees

From the 150th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020

- CI

- 09053
Honorable David A. Canales , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The hearing set for January 4, 2021, on the Plaintiffs' Motion For Enforcement of Temporary Injunctions and Motion For Sanctions is stayed until further order of this court. See Tex. R. App. P. 29.4.

_________________________________ L uz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 30th day of December, 2020

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)   In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Hitor Group, a Nevada corporation (the Company) on Form 10 Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report)I Ken Martin, CEO and CAO of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/ Ken Martin_______________________________ Ken Martin, CEO, CAO Dated:  November 14, 2011
### Part E—Sexual Abuse Prevention Program
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3492 

To amend section 70107 of title 46, United States Code, to authorize 

appropriations for the port security grant program through 2015. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2011 

Ms. HAHN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To amend section 70107 of title 46, United States Code, 

to authorize appropriations for the port security grant 

program through 2015. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Port Security Grant 

5 Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PORT SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM. 

7 Section 70107(l) of title 46, United States Code, is 

8 amended by striking ‘‘2013’’ and inserting ‘‘2015’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 24, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 68309]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26176]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-821-802]


Agreement Suspending the Antidumping Investigation on Uranium 
From the Russian Federation; Correction to the Notice of Initiation of 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Correction to notice of initiation of antidumping and 
countervailing duty administrative reviews.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 24, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sally Gannon or Jonathan Herzog, 
Office of Policy and Negotiations, Bilateral Agreements Unit, Import 
Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington DC 
20230; telephone (202) 482-0162 or (202) 482-4271, respectively.

Background

    On November 19, 2004, the Department of Commerce (``the 
Department'') published in the Federal Register a notice of the 
initiation of antidumping and countervailing duty administrative 
reviews. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews, 69 FR 67701 (November 19, 2004) (``Initiation 
Notice''). In the Initiation Notice, the Department inadvertently 
listed the initiation of an administrative review of the Agreement 
Suspending the Antidumping Investigation on Uranium from the Russian 
Federation (``Russian uranium suspension agreement''). See Initiation 
Notice, 69 FR at 67701. The Department has not initiated an 
administrative review of the Russian uranium suspension agreement. 
Therefore, the Initiation Notice is hereby corrected to reflect that 
the administrative review of the Russian uranium suspension agreement 
has not been initiated.
    This notice is published in accordance with sections 751(a) of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)), and 19 CFR 
351.221(c)(1)(I).

    Dated: November 22, 2004.
Holly A. Kuga,
Senior Office Director, Office 4 for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 04-26176 Filed 11-23-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Danny D. Davis, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 73-135;

Third District

June 28, 1974.

*35James Geis, of the State Appellate Defender’s Office, of Ottawa, for appellant.

Fred R. Odendahl, State’s Attorney, of Monmouth, for the People.

Mr. JUSTICE STOUDER

delivered the opinion of the court:

Pursuant to his nonnegotiated plea of guilty to the offense of burglary the circuit court of Warren County after hearing denied the request of defendant, Danny Davis, for probation and sentenced him to a term of from 2 to 6 years in the penitentiary. On this appeal the only issue raised is defendant’s claim that his sentence is excessive.

The court conducted a combined hearing on defendant’s request for probation and in aggravation and mitigation of the sentence to be imposed. At such hearing the court considered the testimony of numerous character witnesses called by the defendant, the pre-sentence probation report and defendant’s prior record. It would serve no useful purpose to discuss the evidence at length since the gist of defendant’s argument seems to be that the court by relying primarily on the probation report and defendant’s prior record abused its discretion in meting out the sentence imposed.

In our view of the record we find no reason for disturbing the determination of the trial court. While it is true there was evidence presented by the defendant from which it could be inferred that probation or a lesser sentence might be appropriate it is also true that there is evidence contrary to the foregoing inferences supporting the action of the trial court. According to the evidence of defendant’s prior record he had been convicted of numerous misdemeanors most of them growing out of automobile offenses, liquor offenses and breach of the peace offenses. However, on one of the misdemeanor charges defendant had been sentenced to 9 months in prison. It also appears from the record a previous effort at probation had been unsuccessful. Under these circumstances it is peculiarly the function of the trial court to weigh the conflicting inferences and the fact that he may have referred to defendant’s prior record as of great significance in support of the sentence imposed does not mean that the court has abused its discretion in imposing sentence.

 Finally, defendant argues the court erred in failing to consider periodic imprisonment as provided by the Corrections Act which went *36into effect January 1, 1973. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 38, par. 1005 — 7 — 1.) However, we find no support for such contention in the record and in particular we find no support for any claim that the court failed to consider any of the sentencing alternatives available.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the circuit court of Warren County is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

ALLOY and DIXON, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe annual report on Form 10-K of Network Engines, Inc. (the “Company”)for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned,Gregory A. Shortell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)   the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.
| Dated: December 14, 2006 |                     |
|-------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                          | /s/ GREGORY  A. SHORTELL |
|                          | Gregory A. Shortell      |
|                          | Chief Executive Officer  |

 

----
United States

Environmental Protection

Agency

EPA/625/R-95/005

July 1996

Office of Research and

Development

Washington DC 20460

Pump-and-Treat

Ground-Water Remediation

A Guide for Decision Makers

and Practitioners
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# November 2011 Report on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of The Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206.

Accession Number: ML11340A112

Date Released: Friday, December 23, 2011

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML11341A020 - November 2011 Status Of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of The Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206. (3 page(s), 12/19/2011)
    - ML11341A040 - November 2011 Status Of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206 Enclosures. (20 page(s), 12/19/2011)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
### §80301. Organization

(a) Federal Charter.—Girl Scouts of the United States of America (in this chapter, the "corporation") is a body corporate and politic of the District of Columbia.

(b) Domicile.—The domicile of the corporation is the District of Columbia.

(c) Perpetual Existence.—Except as otherwise provided, the corporation has perpetual existence.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1361.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 80301 | 36:31. | Mar. 16, 1950, ch. 62, §§1, 2 (words before 2d comma), 64 Stat. 22. |
| | 36:32 (words before 2d comma). | |

Section

This section is substituted for the source provisions for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate executed and unnecessary words.
Cullen Thomas
 Consulting Geologist
 3621 Meadow Lane
 Edmond, OK 73013





Board of Directors


American Energy Production, Inc.


6073 Hwy 281 South,


Mineral Wells, TX 76067





May 11, 2010





Please utilize this correspondence as authorization for American Energy Production, Inc. (“AENP”) to utilize our report dated May 4, 2010 and all of the reserve estimates and projected future net income information (“Reserve Report”) for the AENP Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.  Additionally, AENP is authorized to disclose the Reserve Report to parties through press releases and on the AENP web site.





Sincerely,








/s/ Cullen Thomas


Cullen Thomas


Consulting Geologist
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 10, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-50687

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FERNANDO RIVERA-DELGADO,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. DR-02-CR-00721-ALL

--------------------

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Fernando Rivera-Delgado appeals the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United

States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Rivera-Delgado contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior

conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element

of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have

been alleged in his indictment. Rivera-Delgado maintains that he
No. 03-50687

-2-

pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry

under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds

the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed

for that offense.

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Rivera-Delgado acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1524

MAURICE A. DAVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LABAN WHITE, Attorney; CITY OF CLARKSBURGSANITARY BOARD; WOODY THRASHER; THRASHER ENGINEERING; OTHER LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (CA-00-9-1) Submitted: September 21, 2000 Decided: September 27, 2000 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Maurice A. Davis, Appellant Pro Se. John Andrew Smith, SMITH, CONLEY & WELLBORN, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Maurice A. Davis appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) motion and dismissing this civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Davis v. White , No. CA00-9-1 (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 27, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>


                                                                 Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of APW Ltd. (n/k/a BQX Ltd.) (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 2) for the year ended August 31, 2001
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Richard G. Sim, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/
---------------------------
Richard G. Sim
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 6, 2002
### SUBCHAPTER XXII—HEALTH SERVICES WITH RESPECT TO ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROME
| (1)   | the                  Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Colombia Goldfields                  Ltd. for                  the quarter ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements                  of                  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                  information contained in the Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A                  for                  the quarter ended June 30, 2006, fairly presents in all material                  respects,                  the financial condition and results of operations of Colombia Goldfields                  Ltd.. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: | /s/                    J. Randall Martin                          |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  J.                    Randall Martin                        |
|  Title:    |  Principal                    Executive Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  February                    9, 2007                         |
|   By: | /s/                    James Kopperson                            |
|  Name:     |  James                    Kopperson                          |
|  Title:    |  Principal                    Financial Officer              |
|  Date:     |  February                      9,                      2007  |
### **CHAPTER 137—MANAGEMENT OF RECHARGEABLE BATTERIES AND BATTERIES CONTAINING MERCURY**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERALLY

Sec.
14301.
Findings.
14302.
Definitions.
14303.
Information dissemination.
14304.
Enforcement.
14305.
Information gathering and access.
14306.
State authority.
14307.
Authorization of appropriations.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—RECYCLING OF RECHARGEABLE BATTERIES

14321.
Purpose.
14322.
Rechargeable consumer products and labeling.
14323.
Requirements.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—MANAGEMENT OF BATTERIES CONTAINING MERCURY

14331.
Purpose.
14332.
Limitations on sale of alkaline-manganese batteries containing mercury.
14333.
Limitations on sale of zinc-carbon batteries containing mercury.
14334.
Limitations on sale of button cell mercuric-oxide batteries.
14335.
Limitations on sale of other mercuric-oxide batteries.
14336.
New product or use.
| **Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity - (Parenthetical) - $ / shares** | 12 Months Ended |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|
||
| **Statement of Stockholders' Equity [Abstract]**                                   |            |   |   |
| Dividends declared per share (usd per share)                                       | $ 2.88          | $ 3.60 | $ 2.27 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Aggregate dividends declared during the period for each share of common stock outstanding.
+ References
Reference 1: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Topic 505 -SubTopic 10 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section S99 -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph (SX 210.3-04) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org//1943274/2147480008/505-10-S99-1
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_CommonStockDividendsPerShareDeclared**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**dtr-types:perShareItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_StatementOfStockholdersEquityAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |