alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, James W. McGinley, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of StratosInternational, Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:
     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
 

 

     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date:  July 29, 2004 /s/ James W. McGinley   James W. McGinley   President and Chief Executive Officer
### **CHAPTER 70—MANUFACTURED HOME CONSTRUCTION AND SAFETY STANDARDS**

Sec.
5401.
Findings and purposes.
5402.
Definitions.
5403.
Construction and safety standards.
5404.
Manufactured home installation.
5405.
Judicial review of orders establishing standards; petition; additional evidence before Secretary; certified copy of transcript.
5406.
Submission of cost or other information by manufacturer.
5407.
Research, testing, development, and training by Secretary.
5408.
Cooperation by Secretary with public and private agencies.
5409.
Prohibited acts; exemptions.
5410.
Civil and criminal penalties.
5411.
Injunctive relief.
5412.
Noncompliance with standards or defective nature of manufactured home; administrative or judicial determination; repurchase by manufacturer or repair by distributor or retailer; reimbursement of expenses, etc., by manufacturer; injunctive relief against manufacturer for failure to comply; jurisdiction and venue; damages; period of limitation.
5413.
Inspections and investigations for promulgation or enforcement of standards or execution of other duties.
5414.
Notification and correction of defects by manufacturer.
5415.
Certification by manufacturer of conformity of manufactured home with standards; form and placement of certification.
5416.
Consumer's manual; contents.
5417.
Effect upon antitrust laws.
5418.
Use of services, research and testing facilities of public agencies and independent laboratories.
5419.
Authority to collect fee.
5420.
Failure to report violations; penalties.
5421.
Prohibition on waiver of rights.
5422.
State enforcement.
5423.
Grants to States.
5424.
Rules and regulations.
5425.
Repealed.
5426.
Authorization of appropriations.
#### Lightboro Realty Corporation v. City of New York.

Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 748.]
### §3476. Education outside the United States

An eligible veteran may not enroll in any course offered by an educational institution not located in a State unless that educational institution is an approved institution of higher learning and the course is approved by the Secretary. The Secretary may deny or discontinue educational assistance under this chapter in the case of any veteran enrolled in an institution of higher learning not located in a State if the Secretary determines that such enrollment is not in the best interest of the veteran or the Federal Government.

(Added Pub. L. 89–358, §2, Mar. 3, 1966, 80 Stat. 17, §1676; amended Pub. L. 94–502, title II, §211(9), Oct. 15, 1976, 90 Stat. 2389; Pub. L. 96–466, title III, §307(b), Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2193; Pub. L. 101–237, title IV, §423(b)(1)(A), Dec. 18, 1989, 103 Stat. 2092; renumbered §3476, Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 406; Pub. L. 103–446, title VI, §604(a), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4671.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those comprising this section were contained in Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1177, which was classified to former section 1620 (second and third sentences) of this title, prior to repeal by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 89–358.

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–446 amended first sentence generally. Prior to amendment, first sentence read as follows: "An eligible veteran may not enroll in any course at an educational institution not located in a State unless such course is pursued at an approved institution of higher learning and the course is approved by the Secretary."

1991—Pub. L. 102–83 renumbered section 1676 of this title as this section.

1989—Pub. L. 101–237 substituted "Secretary" for "Administrator" wherever appearing.

1980—Pub. L. 96–466, among other changes, substituted reference to an eligible veteran not enrolling in any course for reference to an eligible veteran not pursuing a program of education, inserted provision that the course be approved by the Administrator, and substituted reference to any veteran enrolled in an institution of higher learning not located in a State for reference to any veteran in a foreign educational institution.

1976—Pub. L. 94–502 substituted "the Administrator's" for "his" and "if the Administrator finds" for "if he finds".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Pub. L. 103–446, title VI, §604(b), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4671, provided that: "The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall apply with respect to courses approved on or after the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 2, 1994]."

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–466 effective Oct. 1, 1980, except as otherwise specifically provided, see section 802(c) of Pub. L. 96–466, set out as a note under section 3452 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1976 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 94–502 effective Oct. 15, 1976, see section 703(b) of Pub. L. 94–502, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3693 of this title.
### subpart 1—stephanie tubbs jones child welfare services program

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–351, title I, §102(c), Oct. 7, 2008, 122 Stat. 3956, substituted "Stephanie Tubbs Jones Child Welfare Services Program" for "Child Welfare Services" in subpart heading.

Pub. L. 103–66, title XIII, §13711(a)(1), Aug. 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 649, added subpart 1 heading.
#### § 8a.210 Military and merchant marine educational institutions.

These Title IX regulations do not apply to an educational institution whose primary purpose is the training of individuals for a military service of the United States or for the merchant marine.
#### § 1000.19 Office of Financial Management, Planning and Evaluation.

The Office of Financial Management, Planning and Evaluation is responsible for developing the Commission's funds control system, long-range strategic plans, annual performance budgets and operating plans; analysis of major policy and operational issues; performing evaluations and management studies of Commission programs and activities; ensuring that Commission resources are procured and expended as planned and according to purchasing regulations; the review, control, and payment of Commission financial obligations; and, reporting on the use and performance of Commission resources. The Office recommends actions to the Executive Director to enhance the effectiveness of Commission programs and the management of budget, planning and evaluation, financial, and procurement activities. The Office serves as the staff support to the Commission Chief Financial Officer.
#### Joseph Guzik, Defendant in Error, v. Malgorzata Tomczak and John Tomczak, Plaintiffs in Error.

Gen. No. 21,192.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John R. Caverly, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the March term, 1915.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed January 17, 1916.

Statement of the Case.

Action by Joseph Guzik, plaintiff, against Malgorzata Tomczak and John Tomczak, defendants, owners of premises leased by plaintiff, for damages for unlawfully entering upon the leased premises and making repairs. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

L. J. Haigler, for plaintiffs in error.

*485Abstract of the Decision.

1. Landlord and tenant, § *433*
      ***
      *—what does not constitute extension of lease.*There was no extension of a lease where the landlord, before the expiration of the old lease, notified the tenant by letter that he would expect prompt surrender of the premises- at the expiration of the term, as he had made a lease to another person; that possession was necessary to make needed repairs and that if the tenant remained in possession after expiration of the term he would be charged double rent; and, after expiration of the term, the tenant vacated the premises after the landlord commenced making repairs, and the subsequent tender of double rent was refused.

2. Contracts, § *8*
      ***
      *—necessity of certainty in terms of.*A contract, in order to be binding, must be definite in all its provisions.

3. Instructions, § *118*
      ***
      *—when instruction refused as not applicable to evidence.*In an action for damages for unlawfully entering upon leased premises and making repairs, an instruction that it was the tenant’s duty to vacate the premises at the time of the expiration of the lease unless the jury found from the evidence that the tenant made arrangements with the landlord whereby he was to retain possession after the expiration of the lease,, *held*erroneous where there was no extension or renewal of the lease.

Lee W. Carpenter, for defendant in error.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.
Exhibit
13.2
  Certification
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
 Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C.
§§ 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an
officer of Global Sources Ltd. (the “Company”) that the amended Annual Report of
the Company on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company at the end of and for the periods covered by such
Report.
  Dated:  January
13, 2010
   /s/ David Gillan
                  David
      Gillan
                  Chief
      Financial Officer
 
 The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 1350(a) and
(b)), is not a part of the Form 20-F to which it refers and is, to the extent
permitted by law, provided by the above signatory to the extent of his
knowledge.
  A
SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO GLOBAL SOURCES LTD. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY GLOBAL SOURCES LTD. AND
FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON
REQUEST.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3481 

To prohibit universal service support of commercial mobile service through 

the Lifeline program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2011 

Mr. GRIFFIN of Arkansas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prohibit universal service support of commercial mobile 

service through the Lifeline program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Taxpayer Funded 

5 Cell Phones Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON LIFELINE SUPPORT FOR COM7 MERCIAL MOBILE SERVICE. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—A provider of commercial mobile 

9 service may not receive universal service support under 

10 sections 214(e) and 254 of the Communications Act of 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3481 IH

1 1934 (47 U.S.C. 214(e); 254) for the provision of such 

2 service through the Lifeline program of the Federal Com3 munications Commission. 

4 (b) COMMERCIAL MOBILE SERVICE DEFINED.—In 

5 this section, the term ‘‘commercial mobile service’’ has the 

6 meaning given such term in section 332(d)(1) of the Com7 munications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 332(d)(1)). 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### §§11601 to 11610. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 11601, Pub. L. 100–300, §2, Apr. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 437, which provided findings and declarations related to the International Child Abduction Remedies Act, was transferred to section 9001 of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse.

Section 11602, Pub. L. 100–300, §3, Apr. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 437, which provided definitions, was transferred to section 9002 of Title 22.

Section 11603, Pub. L. 100–300, §4, Apr. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 438, which related to judicial remedies, was transferred to section 9003 of Title 22.

Section 11604, Pub. L. 100–300, §5, Apr. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 439, which related to provisional remedies, was transferred to section 9004 of Title 22.

Section 11605, Pub. L. 100–300, §6, Apr. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 439, which related to admissibility of documents, was transferred to section 9005 of Title 22.

Section 11606, Pub. L. 100–300, §7, Apr. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 439; Pub. L. 105–277, div. G, title XXII, §2213, Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–812; Pub. L. 108–370, §2, Oct. 25, 2004, 118 Stat. 1750, which related to the United States Central Authority, was transferred to section 9006 of Title 22.

Section 11607, Pub. L. 100–300, §8, Apr. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 440, which related to costs and fees, was transferred to section 9007 of Title 22.

Section 11608, Pub. L. 100–300, §9, Apr. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 440, which related to collection, maintenance, and dissemination of information, was transferred to section 9008 of Title 22.

Section 11608a, Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(7) [div. A, title II, §201], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–419, which related to the Office of Children's Issues, was transferred to section 9009 of Title 22.

Section 11609, Pub. L. 100–300, §10, Apr. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 441, which related to an interagency coordinating group, was transferred to section 9010 of Title 22.

Section 11610, Pub. L. 100–300, §12, Apr. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 442, which related to authorization of appropriations, was transferred to section 9011 of Title 22.
§ 1211.23 Certification testing. ( a ) *General.* Manufacturers and importers shall either test each individual garage door operator (or have it tested) or shall rely upon a reasonable testing program to demonstrate compliance with the requirements of the standard.
( b ) *Reasonable testing program.* This paragraph provides guidance for establishing a reasonable testing program. ( 1 ) A reasonable testing program for automatic residential garage door operators is one that provides reasonable assurance that the operators comply with the standard. Manufacturers and importers may define their own testing programs. Such reasonable testing programs may, at the option of manufacturers and importers, be conducted by an independent third party qualified to perform such testing programs.
( 2 ) To conduct a reasonable testing program, the garage door operators should be divided into production lots. Sample operators from each production lot should be tested in accordance with the reasonable testing program so that there is a reasonable assurance that if the operators selected for testing meet the standard, all operators in the lot will meet the standard. Where there is a change in parts, suppliers of parts, or production methods that could affect the ability of the operator to comply with the requirements of the standard, the manufacturer should establish a new production lot for testing.
( 3 ) The Commission will test for compliance with the standard by using the test procedures contained in the standard. However, a manufacturer's reasonable testing program may include either tests prescribed in the standard or any other reasonable test procedures.
( 4 ) If the reasonable testing program shows that an operator does not comply with one or more requirements of the standard, no operator in the production lot can be certified as complying until all non-complying operators in the lot have been identified and destroyed or altered by repair, redesign, or use of a different material or components to the extent necessary to make them conform to the standard. The sale or offering for sale of garage door operators that do not comply with the standard is a prohibited act and a violation of section 19(a) of the CPSA (15 U.S.C. 2068(a)), regardless of whether the operator has been validly certified.
### Part B—Education
Amendment to SCG Holding Corporation 1999 Founders Stock Option Plan



 Exhibit 10.3 
 AMENDMENT TO THE 
 SCG HOLDING CORPORATION 
 1999 FOUNDERS STOCK OPTION PLAN 
 ON
Semiconductor Corporation (“Company”), formerly SCG Holding Corporation, previously approved and adopted the SCG Holding Corporation 1999 Stock Option Plan (“Plan”). The Plan has been amended from time to time. By this
instrument, the Company desires to further amend the Plan to help prevent inadvertent earnings charges under the revised Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (“FAS 123R”), “Share-Based Payment”
(“Amendment”). 
  

	 	1.	The provisions of this Amendment shall be effective as of the date adopted by the Company’s Compensation Committee. 

  

	 	2.	Section 4.14(a) of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows: 

 (a) Increase or Decrease in Issued Shares Without Consideration. Subject to any required action by the stockholders of the Company, in the event of any increase or decrease in the number of issued shares of
Common Stock resulting from a subdivision or consolidation of shares of Common Stock or the payment of a stock dividend (but only on the shares of Common Stock), or any other increase or decrease in the number of such shares effected without receipt
of consideration by the Company, the Board shall make such adjustments with respect to the number of shares of Common Stock subject to the Options and the exercise price per share of Common Stock to prevent the enlargement or dilution of rights.

  

	 	3.	Section 4.14(d) of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows: 

 (d) Other Changes. In the event of any change in the capitalization of the Company or a corporate change other than those specifically referred to in Sections 4.14(a), (b) or (c) hereof, the Board
shall make adjustments in the number and class of shares subject to Options outstanding on the date on which such change occurs and in the per-share exercise price of each such Option to prevent dilution or enlargement of rights. 
 4. This Amendment shall amend only the provisions of the Plan as set forth herein. Those provisions of the Plan not expressly amended shall be considered
in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment
to be executed by its duly authorized representative on this 16th day of May, 2007. 
  

			
	ON SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	/s/ G. SONNY CAVE
		 	G. Sonny Cave,
		 	Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

In connection with the report of LFG International, Inc. (the"Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2006, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Lyle Durham, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Sect. 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sect. 1350), that to my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

 

/s/ Lyle Durham 

Lyle Durham, Chief Financial Officer and

Chief Executive Officer

Dated: January 19, 2007
# &:a NCDENR
North Carolina Department ofEnvironment and Natural Resources Beverly Eaves Perdue Dee Freeman Governor Secretary December 9, 2009

A. Stanley Meiberg, Acting Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 61 Forsyth Street, SW Atlanta, GA 30303-3104
SUBJECT: Wright Chemical Corp. NPL Listing Riegelwood (Acme) , Columbus County, NC NCD 024 766 719

# DearMr~ 

# A::

I am writing in response to your request for the state ofNorth Carolina's position regarding the proposed listing ofthe Wright Chemical Corp. site on the National Priorities List (NPL).
The State of North Carolina agrees that the site poses a significant threat to the public health and the environment. Therefore, we support the Environmental Protection Agency ' s efforts to propose this site for inclusion on the NPL.
North Carolina appreciates the EPA ' s continued assistance to protect the state ' s public health and the environment. If you have any questions or require further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact Jim Bateson, NC Superfund Section at (919) 508-8449.

## ~cerel**Y'**

# ~F~~P~

cc: Dexter Matthews, NC DWM Jack Butler, NC DWM Jim Bateson, NC DWM Franklin Hill , US EPA Region 4 Jennifer Wendel, US EPA Region 4

1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601

# N~rth Carolina Phone: 919-733-4984 \ FAX: 919-715-3060 Internet: www.enr

.state.nc.us 

# ;Valuralill An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer

- 50 % Recycled \ 10% Post Consumer Paper
### SUBCHAPTER VIII—SPECIAL BENEFITS FOR CERTAIN WORLD WAR II VETERANS

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior subchapter VIII, relating to taxes with respect to employment and consisting of sections 1001 to 1011 of this title, was omitted. See Prior Provisions note set out under section 1001 of this title.
### SUBCHAPTER I—PAYMENTS TO STATES FOR ELECTION ADMINISTRATION IMPROVEMENTS AND REPLACEMENT OF PUNCH CARD AND LEVER VOTING MACHINES