alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §8101. Supervision of public buildings and grounds in District of Columbia not otherwise provided for by law

(a) In General.—Under regulations the President prescribes, the Administrator of General Services shall have charge of the public buildings and grounds in the District of Columbia, except those buildings and grounds which otherwise are provided for by law.

(b) Notice of Unlawful Occupancy.—If the Administrator, or the officer under the direction of the Administrator who is in immediate charge of those public buildings and grounds, decides that an individual is unlawfully occupying any part of that public land, the Administrator or officer in charge shall notify the United States marshal for the District of Columbia in writing of the unlawful occupation.

(c) Ejection of Trespasser.—The marshal shall have the trespasser ejected from the public land and shall restore possession of the land to the officer charged by law with the custody of the land.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1204.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8101 | 40:19. | R.S. §1797; Apr. 28, 1902, ch. 594, [§] 1 (6th par. on p. 152), 32 Stat. 152. |

Section

In this chapter, the words "Administrator of General Services" are substituted for "Chief of Engineers" [subsequently changed to "Director of Public Buildings and Public Parks of the National Capital" because of section 3 of the Act of February 26, 1925 (ch. 339, 43 Stat. 983), "Director of the National Park Service" because of section 2 of Executive Order No. 6166 (eff. June 10, 1933) and the Act of March 2, 1934 (ch. 38, 48 Stat. 389), and "Public Buildings Administrator" because of sections 301 and 303 of Reorganization Plan No. I of 1939 (eff. July 1, 1939, 53 Stat. 1426, 1427)] because of section 103(a) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (ch. 288, 63 Stat. 380), which is restated as section 303(c) [303(b)] of the revised title.

In subsection (a), the words "through the War Department" in section 1797 of the Revised Statutes are omitted because of section 3 of the Act of February 26, 1925 (ch. 339, 43 Stat. 983).

In subsection (b), the words "If the Administrator . . . decides" are substituted for "when it shall be made to appear to the said Administrator" for clarity. The words "in the District of Columbia" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "the Administrator and the officer in charge" are substituted for "the officer in charge" for clarity.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                      CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE 1st BANCORP
  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 REGARDING QUARTERLY
           REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB/A FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2006


         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of Service 1st Bancorp, a California corporation
("Bancorp"), does hereby certify that:

1.       Bancorp's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended June
         30, 2006 (the "Form 10-QSB/A") fully complies with the requirements of
         Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
         amended; and

2.       Information contained in the Form 10-QSB/A fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         Bancorp.




Date: March 9, 2007                      By: /s/ JOHN O. BROOKS
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             John O. Brooks
                                             Chief Executive Officer
                                             (Principal Executive Officer)

Date: March 9, 2007                      By: /s/ ROBERT E. BLOCH
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             Robert E. Bloch
                                             Executive Vice President and
                                             Chief financial Officer
                                             (Principal Financial and
                                             Accounting Officer)



         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Service 1st Bancorp and will be retained by Service 1st Bancorp
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

                                       28
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 30, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 69681]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26301]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 34531] \1\


The Indiana Rail Road Company--Acquisition Exemption--Line of 
Monon Rail Preservation Corporation

    The Indiana Rail Road Company (INRD), a Class III rail carrier, has 
filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.41 to acquire 
from Monon Rail Preservation Corporation (Monon), approximately 3.98 
miles of rail line between milepost Q217.67 at Hunters, IN, and 
milepost Q213.69 at Ellettsville, IN, in Monroe County, IN. In 2001, 
INRD entered into an operating agreement with Monon, whereby INRD 
became the operator of the line.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ In a decision in this proceeding served on November 22, 
2004, the Board granted a request by INRD for waiver of the 60-day 
advance labor notice requirement of 49 CFR 1150.42(e).
    \2\ See The Indiana Rail Road Company--Operation Exemption--
Monon Rail Preservation Corporation, STB Finance Docket No. 33670 
(STB served Feb. 21, 2001).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    INRD certifies that its projected annual revenues as a result of 
this transaction will not result in the creation of a Class I or Class 
II rail carrier.
    INRD indicates that the parties would like to consummate the 
transaction on or shortly after December 6, 2004.
    If the notice contains false or misleading information, the 
exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 
U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to 
revoke will not automatically stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 34531, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, 1925 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, one 
copy of each pleading must be served on John Broadley, 1054 31st 
Street, NW., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20007.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at http://www.stb.dot.gov.

    Decided: November 22, 2004.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04-26301 Filed 11-29-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-01-P
### §3312. Database on price trends of items and services under Federal contracts

(a) Database Required.—The Administrator shall establish and maintain a database of information on price trends for items and services under contracts with the Federal Government. The information in the database shall be designed to assist Federal acquisition officials in the following:

(1) Monitoring developments in price trends for items and services under contracts with the Federal Government.

(2) Conducting price or cost analyses for items and services under offers for contracts with the Federal Government, or otherwise conducting determinations of the reasonableness of prices for items and services under such offers, and addressing unjustified escalation in prices being paid by the Federal Government for items and services under contracts with the Federal Government.

(b) Use.—(1) The database under subsection (a) shall be available to executive agencies in the evaluation of offers for contracts with the Federal Government for items and services.

(2) The Secretary of Defense may satisfy the requirements of this section by complying with the requirements of section 892 1 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (10 U.S.C. 2306a note).

(Added Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title VIII, §851(a)(1), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1855.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 892 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011, referred to in subsec. (b)(2), is section 892 of Pub. L. 111–383, which was formerly set out as a note under section 2306a of Title 10, Armed Forces, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title X, §1073(f), Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 996.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Use of Elements of Department of Defense Pilot Project

Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title VIII, §851(b), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1855, provided that: "In establishing the database required by section 3312 of title 41, United States Code (as added by subsection (a)), the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy shall use and incorporate appropriate elements of the pilot project on pricing being carried out by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics pursuant to section 892 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 [Pub. L. 111–383] (10 U.S.C. 2306a note) and the Better Buying Power initiative of the Secretary of Defense."

1 See References in Text note below.
Exhibit 32

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
                               U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      In connection  with the report of ProUroCare  Medical Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ended  September  30,  2005 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Maurice
R. Taylor,  Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  and I, Richard Thon, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Maurice R. Taylor
-----------------------
Maurice R. Taylor
Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2005

/s/ Richard Thon
-----------------------
Richard Thon
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2005
### §10201. Judicial review

Judicial review of research and development activities under this subchapter shall be in accordance with the provisions of section 10139 of this title.

(Pub. L. 97–425, title II, §221, Jan. 7, 1983, 96 Stat. 2254.)
#### Unity Sheet Metal Works, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Farrell Lines Incorporated, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Georgianna Knappen, as Executrix of Theodore T. Knappen, Deceased, et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Present — Cohn, J. P., Callahan, Breitel, Bastow and Botein, JJ.
### [§14. Repealed. Pub. L. 117–328, div. P, title I, §108(c)(1), Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5237]

Section, act June 25, 1948, ch. 644, 62 Stat. 675, related to forfeiture for messenger's neglect of duty.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.16

                          AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE

               AMENDMENT, dated as of January 26, 2001 (this "Amendment"), to
the Promissory Note, dated as of January 31, 2000 (the "Note"), between the
undersigned (the "Borrower"), and Western Multiplex Corporation, a Delaware
Corporation ("WMC" or the "Lender").

                              W I T N E S S E T H:
                              - - - - - - - - - -

               WHEREAS, pursuant to the Note, the Lender has agreed to make, and
has made, extensions of credit to the Borrower; and

               WHEREAS, the Borrower has requested, and, upon this Amendment
becoming effective, the Lender has agreed, that certain provisions of the Note
be amended in the manner provided for in this Amendment;

               NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the
agreements hereinafter set forth, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

               SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO SECTION 3(b) OF THE NOTE. Section 3(b) of
the Note is hereby amended by deleting all of the language contained in such
section and the caption is hereby amended to omit the words "Limited Recourse".

               SECTION 2. COUNTERPARTS. This Amendment may be executed in any
number of counterparts, all of which together shall constitute a single
instrument.

               SECTION 3. GOVERNING LAW. This Amendment and the rights and
obligations of the parties hereto shall be governed by, and construed and
interpreted in accordance with, the law of the State of California.

                     [Rest of Page Intentionally Left Blank]


<PAGE>


               IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment
to be duly executed and delivered by their proper and duly authorized officers
as of the day and year first above written.

                                            WESTERN MULTIPLEX CORPORATION


                                            By: /s/ Nancy Huber
                                               _________________________________
                                               Name: Nancy Huber
                                               Title: Chief Financial Officer


                                            EMPLOYEE


                                            By: /s/ Amir Zoufonoun
                                               _________________________________
                                               Name:  Amir Zoufonoun


                                            SPOUSE


                                            By: /s/ Lisa Zoufonoun
                                               _________________________________
                                               Name: Lisa Zoufonoun
### §7653. Amount of assistance

The Secretary may pay to a person selected to receive assistance under this subchapter the amount of $400 (adjusted in accordance with section 7631 of this title) for each month of the person's enrollment in a program of education or training covered by the agreement of the person entered into under section 7603 of this title. Payment of such benefits for any period shall be coordinated with any payment of benefits for the same period under chapter 106 of title 10.

(Added Pub. L. 101–366, title II, §205(a)(1), Aug. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 440, §4353; renumbered §7653 and amended Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §402(b)(1), (d)(1), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 238, 239.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–40 renumbered section 4353 of this title as this section and substituted "7631" for "4331" and "7603" for "4303".
(November 16, 1943.)

#### In the Matter of Warren N. Chase, an Attorney.

Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffeman and Sehenek, JJ., concur; Crapser, J., taking no part.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rodney D. McFarland, Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 322]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Kenneth R. Fisher, J.), rendered July 25, 2003. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of murder in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [1]), criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (§ 265.03 [2]), and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (§ 265.02 [4]). Contrary to the contentions raised in defendant’s pro se supplemental brief, the conviction is supported by legally sufficient evidence *(see People v Streeter,*21 AD3d 1291, 1292 [2005], *lv denied*6 NY3d 898 [2006]), and the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence *(see generally People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]; *People v Hill,*30 AD3d 1024 [2006]).

Contrary to the contentions raised in defendant’s main brief, Supreme Court did not err in summarily denying defendant’s motion to suppress evidence as the fruit of an allegedly unlawful arrest. Indeed, defendant fails to identify any suppressible fruits of his arrest, and our review of the record reveals none. The court also did not err in admitting in evidence the recordings of telephone calls evincing defendant’s participation in a scheme to tamper with the eyewitness *(see generally People v Robinson,*28 AD3d 1126, 1128 [2006]; *People v De Vivo,*282 AD2d 770, 772 [2001], *lv denied*96 NY2d 900 [2001]; *People v Jones,*276 AD2d 292 [2000], *lv denied*95 NY2d 965 [2000]), and the recordings were properly authenticated, thereby establishing the requisite foundation for their admission in evidence *(see People v Williams,*281 AD2d 933 [2001], *lv denied*96 *1239NY2d 869 [2001]; *People v Fuschino,*278 AD2d 657, 659 [2000], *lv denied*96 NY2d 800 [2001]). Even assuming, arguendo, that the court erred in admitting in evidence certain records of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles under the business records exception to the hearsay rule *(see generally*CPLR 4518; *People v Kennedy,*68 NY2d 569, 575-580 [1986]), we conclude that the error is harmless. The evidence of defendant’s guilt is overwhelming, and there is no significant probability that defendant would have been acquitted but for the admission of those records *(see generally People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 241-242 [1975]). The court did not err in submitting both the intentional and depraved indifference murder counts to the jury, inasmuch as the jury was properly instructed on the verdict sheet to consider the counts in the alternative. The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Green, JJ.
### SUBCHAPTER III—LIVABLE CITIES
# Europos Sąjungos C 391/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0960 |
| --- | --- |
| Europos Sąjungos
  oficialusis leidinys | C 391 |
| | |
| Leidimas lietuvių kalba | Informacija ir pranešimai | 63 metai2020m. lapkričio 16d. |

ISSN 1977-0960

Europos Sąjungos

oficialusis leidinys

C 391

Leidimas lietuvių kalba

Informacija ir pranešimai

63 metai2020m. lapkričio 16d.

---

| Turinys | Puslapis |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Pranešimai |
| | EUROPOS SĄJUNGOS INSTITUCIJŲ, ĮSTAIGŲ IR ORGANŲ PRANEŠIMAI |
| | Taryba |
| 2020/C 391/01 | 2020 m. lapkričio 10 d. Tarybos sprendimas, kuriuo skiriamas Europos Sąjungos intelektinės nuosavybės tarnybos Apeliacinių tarybų pirmininkas | 1 |

Turinys

Puslapis

IV   Pranešimai

EUROPOS SĄJUNGOS INSTITUCIJŲ, ĮSTAIGŲ IR ORGANŲ PRANEŠIMAI

Taryba

2020/C 391/01

2020 m. lapkričio 10 d. Tarybos sprendimas, kuriuo skiriamas Europos Sąjungos intelektinės nuosavybės tarnybos Apeliacinių tarybų pirmininkas

1

---

| LT | |
| --- | --- |

LT

---

IV Pranešimai

EUROPOS SĄJUNGOS INSTITUCIJŲ, ĮSTAIGŲ IR ORGANŲ PRANEŠIMAI

Taryba

| 2020 11 16 | LT | Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys | C 391/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2020 11 16

LT

Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys

C 391/1

---

TARYBOS SPRENDIMAS

2020 m. lapkričio 10 d.

kuriuo skiriamas Europos Sąjungos intelektinės nuosavybės tarnybos Apeliacinių tarybų pirmininkas

(2020/C 391/01)

EUROPOS SĄJUNGOS TARYBA,

atsižvelgdama į Sutartį dėl Europos Sąjungos veikimo,

atsižvelgdama į 2017 m. birželio 14 d. Europos Parlamento ir Tarybos reglamentą (ES) 2017/1001 dėl Europos Sąjungos prekių ženklo (1), ypač į jo 166 straipsnio 1 dalį,

kadangi:

2020 m. birželio 8 d. Taryba iš Europos Sąjungos intelektinės nuosavybės tarnybos (toliau – EUIPO) Valdančiosios tarybos gavo kandidatų, siūlomų į EUIPO Apeliacinių tarybų pirmininko pareigas, sąrašą,

PRIĖMĖ ŠĮ SPRENDIMĄ:

1 straipsnis

1.   João Nuno MAROCO AMARAL NEGRÃO, gimęs 1970 m. lapkričio 2 d. Lisabonoje (Portugalija), skiriamas Europos Sąjungos intelektinės nuosavybės tarnybos (toliau – EUIPO) Apeliacinių tarybų pirmininku penkerių metų laikotarpiui.

2.   Datą, nuo kurios prasideda 1 dalyje nurodytas penkerių metų laikotarpis, nustato EUIPO Valdančioji taryba.

2 straipsnis

Šis sprendimas įsigalioja jo paskelbimo Europos Sąjungos oficialiajame leidinyje dieną.

Priimta Briuselyje 2020 m. lapkričio 10 d.

Tarybos vardu

Pirmininkas

M. ROTH

---

(1)  OL L 154, 2017 6 16, p. 1.

1

---
.,;

",... _--'Atir'TI'.fiLj"I"T~ OF

. 'ANSPORTATION

:~:KET OPERATIOt~S

2JIZ it~Y - 8 A II: 25

07 May 2012

IN REPLY, REFER TO:

L390-12-1021

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Operations, M-30

West Building ground floor,

Room W12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington DC, 20590

~I CeSSna

A Textron Company

SUBJECT:

REFERENCE:

Exemption No. 10089 from 14 CFR 25.1447 (c)(I)

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-0290

This letter submits the petition of Cessna Aircraft Company for the extension of Exemption No.

10089, Regulatory Docket No. FAA-201O-0290, that is presently due to expire on 30 June 2012.

Exemption No. 10089 provides the operation of the Cessna Mode1680 airplane into and out of

an airport with a landing field above 14,000 feet, the flight crew must select the ">14K" position

on the airport elevation selection switch. This results in automatic deployment of the passenger

oxygen masks when the cabin pressure altitude is 15,750 +/- 250 feet. This feature is necessary

to reduce the occurrence of inadvertent deployment of oxygen mask.

Cessna would like the FAA to consider a permanent extension for aircraft 680-297 thru

680-0500.

In closing, Cessna continued to thank FAA for their consideration of previous petitions in the

subject Docket and we are hopeful of FAA's grant of the exemption extension requested in this

letter.

If you require additional information or have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact

Donna DeBuhr at 316-517-0689, email ddebuhr@cessna.textron.com

Sincerely,

~IJJUJ

Donna DeBuhr

Assistant TC ODA Administrator

Cessna Aircraft Company

ODA-I00129-CE
"

"

. '\

"

,'; ... ,'

"

, ,'

, •..r .

.; .

i:

, .

", ~... ,p,

{. ',. i.-"

-

.'."

j-, .".' .."1

.'I:

"

f.'

, ~'.

.,',.

;.'",

"

.~'.'

, '

.r- .'.,'; '... ~-..~,'~

.... ' r

',.'

"

, \

". ~... ,

,

"

.~.,

"

:-'.' .. ,