alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISMISS and Opinion Filed September 30, 2024 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-24-00485-CV 

ROSIE MCCONIC, Appellant 

V. 

GIANG HO, Appellee 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-24-01397-B 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Pedersen, III, and Justice Carlyle 

Opinion by Chief Justice Burns 

Appellant’s brief in this appeal is overdue. After appellant failed to respond 

to our inquiry regarding the reporter’s record, we ordered the appeal submitted 

without the reporter’s record and for appellant’s brief to be filed by August 9, 2024. 

By postcard dated August 13, 2024, we notified appellant her brief was overdue and 

directed her to file a brief within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do 

so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 38.8(a)(1). To date, appellant has not filed a brief nor otherwise 

corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. 
 –2– 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8 (a)(1); 

42.3(b), (c). 

240485F.P05 

 

/Robert D. Burns, III/

ROBERT D. BURNS, III 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

ROSIE MCCONIC, Appellant 

No. 05-24-00485-CV V. 

GIANG HO, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the County Court at 

Law No. 2, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-24-01397-

B. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice 

Burns. Justices Pedersen, III and 

Carlyle participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is 

DISMISSED. 

Judgment entered September 30, 2024
Exhibit 12.1
 Supplemental Financial Schedule II
 TeleCommunication Systems, Inc.
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
(amounts in thousands)
 Column A
    
    Column B
    
    Column C
    
    Column D
    
    Column EBalance
    
    Additions,Beginning of
    
    Costs, and
    
    
    
    
    
    Balance End ofDescription
    
    Year
    
    Expenses
    
    Deductions
    
    YearYear ended December 31, 2008Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
    
    $
    265
    
    
    $
    193
    
    
    $
    (173
    )
    
    $
    285Allowance for Inventory Obsolescence
    
    $
    645
    
    
    $
    353
    
    
    $
    (141
    )
    
    $
    857Year ended December 31, 2007Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
    
    $
    290
    
    
    $
    123
    
    
    $
    (148
    )
    
    $
    265Allowance for Inventory Obsolescence
    
    $
    616
    
    
    $
    100
    
    
    $
    (71
    )
    
    $
    645Year ended December 31, 2006Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
    
    $
    233
    
    
    $
    284
    
    
    $
    (227
    )
    
    $
    290Allowance for Inventory Obsolescence
    
    $
    533
    
    
    $
    83
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    616
§ 1051.6 Documents not considered petitions. ( a ) A document filed with the Commission which addresses a topic or involves a product outside the jurisdiction of the Commission will not be considered to be a petition. After consultation with the Office of the General Counsel, the Office of the Secretary, if appropriate, will forward to the appropriate agency documents which address products or topics within the jurisdiction of other agencies. The Office of the Secretary shall notify the sender of the document that it has been forwarded to the appropriate agency.
( b ) Any other documents filed with the Office of the Secretary that are determined by the Office of the General Counsel not to be petitions shall be evaluated for possible staff action. The Office of the General Counsel shall notify the writer of the manner in which the Commission staff is treating the document. If the writer has indicated an intention to petition the Commission, the Office of the General Counsel shall inform the writer of the procedure to be followed for petitioning.
§ 971.401 Proposal to issue or transfer and proposed terms, conditions and restrictions. ( a ) *Notice and comment.* The Administrator will publish in the Federal Register notice of each proposal to issue or transfer, including notice of a draft EIS, and of proposed terms and conditions for, and restrictions on, a commercial recovery permit that will be included with the draft EIS [see § 971.400(b)]. Subject to § 971.802, interested persons will be permitted to examine the materials relevant to such proposals. Interested persons and affected States will have at least 60 days after publication of such notice to submit written comments to the Administrator.
( b ) *Hearings.* ( 1 ) The Administrator will hold the public hearing(s) required by § 971.212(b) in an appropriate location and may employ such additional methods as he deems appropriate to inform interested persons about each proposal and to invite their comments thereon. A copy of the notice and draft EIS will be provided to the affected State agency. Information provided by NOAA may be used to supplement information provided by the applicant, however it will not affect schedules for State agency review and decisions with respect to consistency determinations as required in 15 CFR part 930, subpart D.
( 2 ) If the Administrator determines there exist one or more specific and material factual issues which require resolution by formal processes, at least one formal hearing, which may be consolidated with a hearing held by another agency, will be held in the District of Columbia metropolitan area in accordance with the provisions of subpart I of this part. The record developed in any such formal hearing will be part of the basis for the Administrator's decisions on issuance or transfer of, and on TCRs for, the permit.
### subpart 2—clinical laboratories
No: III-14-021 June 11, 2014

CONTACT: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663

NRC Schedules Open House June 17 to Discuss 

Performance of Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a public open house June 17 to discuss the 

agency’s annual safety performance of the Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station. The two-unit plant is 

operated by Exelon Generation Co., and is located in Cordova, Ill., about 20 miles northeast of Moline.

The open house is scheduled for 4-6 p.m. CDT at the Cordova Civic Center, 910 Third Ave. 

South, in Cordova. Attendees can have one-on-one discussions with NRC staff members about the 

plant’s 2013 performance and the agency’s oversight of the facility. 

“NRC inspectors spend a significant amount of time monitoring a wide range of plant activities 

to ensure the plant operates safely. Our hands-on approach is a key factor in protecting the public and 

environment,” said NRC Region III Administrator Cynthia D. Pederson. “We hold public meetings near 

the plant every year to make our inspectors available and accessible to answer questions and have open 

discussions about NRC oversight with those who live near the plant.”

The NRC review concluded that Quad Cities operated safely in 2013. All performance indicators 

and inspection findings for the facility were green or of very low risk. As a result, Quad Cities will 

continue to receive the NRC’s normal level of oversight during 2014.

The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess nuclear 

plant performance. The colors start with “green” and then increase to “white,” “yellow,” or “red,”

commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. Performance indicators are statistical 

measurements of plant and equipment performance.

This year Quad Cities will continue to receive the detailed inspection regime used by the NRC 

for all plants. Routine inspections are performed by two NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant 

and by inspection specialists from the Region III Office in Lisle, Ill., and the agency’s headquarters in 

Rockville, Md. 

The annual assessment letter sent from the NRC Region III office to the company addresses the 

performance of the plant during 2013 and is available on the NRC website.
Page | 2

The most current performance information for Quad Cities Unit 1 and Unit 2 is available on the 

NRC website.
§ 1210.13 Certification tests. ( a ) *General.* As explained in § 1210.11 of this subpart, certificates of compliance required by section 14(a) of the CPSA must be based on a reasonable testing program.
( b ) *Reasonable testing programs* — ( 1 ) *Requirements.* ( i ) A reasonable testing program for lighters is one that demonstrates with a high degree of assurance that all lighters manufactured for sale or distributed in commerce will meet the requirements of the standard, including the requirements of § 1210.3. Manufacturers and importers shall determine the types and frequency of testing for their own reasonable testing programs. A reasonable testing program should be sufficiently stringent that it will detect any variations in production or performance during the production interval that would cause any lighters to fail to meet the requirements of the standard.
( ii ) All reasonable testing programs shall include qualification tests, which must be performed on surrogates of each model of lighter produced, or to be produced, to demonstrate that the product is capable of passing the tests prescribed by the standard (see § 1210.14), and production tests, which must be performed during appropriate production intervals as long as the product is being manufactured (see § 1210.16).
( iii ) Corrective action and/or additional testing must be performed whenever certification tests of samples of the product give results that do not provide a high degree of assurance that all lighters manufactured during the applicable production interval will pass the tests of the standard.
( 2 ) *Testing by third parties.* At the option of the manufacturer or importer, some or all of the testing of each lighter or lighter surrogate may be performed by a commercial testing laboratory or other third party. However, the manufacturer or importer must ensure that all certification testing has been properly performed with passing results and that all records of such tests are maintained in accordance with § 1210.17 of this subpart.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

      ( print page 69392)    
                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 20, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), The Aluminum Association, Inc., (“the Aluminum Association”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: The Aluminum Association, Inc., Washington, DC. The nature and scope of the Aluminum Association's standards development activities are: to review all proposals or recommendations regarding revisions, additions, or deletions to the alloy and Temper Designation Systems for Aluminum (ANSI H35.1 and .1(m)), Dimensional Tolerances for Aluminum Mill Products (ANSI H35.2 and .2(M)), the Designation System for Aluminum Hardeners (ANSI H35.3), the Designation System for Unalloyed Aluminum (ANSI H35.4) and the Nomenclature System for Aluminum Metal Matrix Composite Materials (ANSI H35.5); to encourage the use of these documents by reference in other specifications; and to develop proposals for new ANSI standards applicable to aluminum and aluminum alloy wrought and cast products.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-26200  Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
### Part H—Trauma Service Availability
### SUBCHAPTER VII—ADMINISTRATION

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

1950—Act Aug. 28, 1950, ch. 809, title III, pt. 6, §361(f), 64 Stat. 558, substituted "ADMINISTRATION" for "SOCIAL SECURITY BOARD" as subchapter heading.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. on Form 20-F for
the year ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the SEC on the date hereof, I, Chi-Wen Tsai, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 11, 2017



By:

/s/ Chi-Wen
TsaiName:

Chi-Wen TsaiTitle:

Chief Executive Officer




|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
§ 801.5 Confidentiality. Information collected pursuant to 3104(c) of title 22 of the United States Code is confidential. ( a ) Access to this information shall be available only to officials and employees (including consultants and contractors and their employees) of agencies designated by the President to perform functions under the Act.
( b ) Subject to paragraph (d) of this section, the President may authorize the exchange of information between agencies or officials designated to perform functions under the Act.
( c ) Nothing in this part shall be construed to require any Federal agency to disclose information otherwise protected by law.
( d ) This information shall be used solely for analytical or statistical purposes or for a proceeding under § 801.6.
( e ) No official or employee (including consultants and contractors and their employees) shall publish or make available to any other person any information collected under the Act in such a manner that the person to whom the information relates can be specifically identified.
( f ) Reports and copies of reports prepared pursuant to the Act are confidential and their submission or disclosure shall not be compelled by any person without the prior written permission of the person filing the report and the customer of such person where the information supplied is identifiable as being derived from the records of such customer.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Performance Capital Management, LLC (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David J. Caldwell, as Chief Operations Officer of the Company, and I, Edward
M. Rucker, as Accounting Manager of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ David J. CaldwellDavid J. CaldwellChief Operations OfficerAugust 18, 2009/s/ Edward M. RuckerEdward M. RuckerAccounting ManagerAugust 18, 2009








The material contained in this exhibit is not deemed “filed” with the Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
§ 785.18 Record for decision. ( a ) *The record.* The transcript of hearings, exhibits, rulings, orders, all papers and requests filed in the proceedings, and, for purposes of any appeal under § 785.16 of the APR, the decision of the ALJ and such submissions as are provided for under § 785.16 of the APR will constitute the record and the exclusive basis for decision. When a case is settled, the record will consist of any and all of the foregoing, as well as the NOVA or draft NOVA, settlement agreement, and order.
( b ) *Restricted access.* On the ALJ's own motion, or on the motion of any party, the ALJ may direct that there be a restricted access portion of the record for any material in the record to which public access is restricted by law or by the terms of a protective order entered in the proceedings. A party seeking to restrict access to any portion of the record is responsible, prior to the close of the proceeding, for submitting a version of the document(s) proposed for public availability that reflects the requested deletion. The restricted access portion of the record will be placed in a separate file and the file will be clearly marked to avoid improper disclosure and to identify it as a portion of the official record in the proceedings. The ALJ may act at any time to permit material that becomes declassified or unrestricted through passage of time to be transferred to the unrestricted access portion of the record.
( c ) *Availability of documents* — ( 1 ) *Scope.* All NOVAs and draft NOVAs, answers, settlement agreements, decisions and orders disposing of a case will be displayed on the BIS Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Web site, at *http://www.bis.doc.gov/foia ,* which is maintained by the Office of Administration, Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce. The Office of Administration does not maintain a separate inspection facility. The complete record for decision, as defined in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section will be made available on request.
( 2 ) *Timing.* The record for decision will be available only after the final administrative disposition of a case. Parties may seek to restrict access to any portion of the record under paragraph (b) of this section.
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trump Casino Holdings, LLC, and Trump Casino Funding, Inc. (the “Companies”) onForm 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John P. Burke, the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies. |

 

| /s/ JOHN P. BURKE                                                                                                     |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                                                       |   |
| **John P. Burke Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of Trump Casino Holdings, LLC Trump Casino Funding, Inc.** |   |
|                                                                                                                  |   |
| **August 14, 2003**                                                                                                   |   |