alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the Senate of the United States, 

February 6, 2012. 

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 347) entitled ‘‘An Act to correct and simplify the 

drafting of section 1752 (relating to restricted buildings or 

grounds) of title 18, United States Code.’’, do pass with the 

following 

AMENDMENT: 

Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert: 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Restricted 

3 Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011’’. 

4 SEC. 2. RESTRICTED BUILDING OR GROUNDS. 

5 Section 1752 of title 18, United States Code, is amend6 ed to read as follows: 

7 ‘‘§ 1752. Restricted building or grounds 

8 ‘‘(a) Whoever— 
2 

† HR 347 EAS 

1 ‘‘(1) knowingly enters or remains in any re2 stricted building or grounds without lawful authority 

3 to do so; 

4 ‘‘(2) knowingly, and with intent to impede or 

5 disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business or 

6 official functions, engages in disorderly or disruptive 

7 conduct in, or within such proximity to, any re8 stricted building or grounds when, or so that, such 

9 conduct, in fact, impedes or disrupts the orderly con10 duct of Government business or official functions; 

11 ‘‘(3) knowingly, and with the intent to impede or 

12 disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business or 

13 official functions, obstructs or impedes ingress or 

14 egress to or from any restricted building or grounds; 

15 or 

16 ‘‘(4) knowingly engages in any act of physical 

17 violence against any person or property in any re18 stricted building or grounds; 

19 or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be punished as pro20 vided in subsection (b). 

21 ‘‘(b) The punishment for a violation of subsection (a) 

22 is— 

23 ‘‘(1) a fine under this title or imprisonment for 

24 not more than 10 years, or both, if— 
3 

† HR 347 EAS 

1 ‘‘(A) the person, during and in relation to 

2 the offense, uses or carries a deadly or dangerous 

3 weapon or firearm; or 

4 ‘‘(B) the offense results in significant bodily 

5 injury as defined by section 2118(e)(3); and 

6 ‘‘(2) a fine under this title or imprisonment for 

7 not more than one year, or both, in any other case. 

8 ‘‘(c) In this section— 

9 ‘‘(1) the term ‘restricted buildings or grounds’ 

10 means any posted, cordoned off, or otherwise re11 stricted area— 

12 ‘‘(A) of the White House or its grounds, or 

13 the Vice President’s official residence or its 

14 grounds; 

15 ‘‘(B) of a building or grounds where the 

16 President or other person protected by the Secret 

17 Service is or will be temporarily visiting; or 

18 ‘‘(C) of a building or grounds so restricted 

19 in conjunction with an event designated as a 

20 special event of national significance; and 

21 ‘‘(2) the term ‘other person protected by the Se22 cret Service’ means any person whom the United 

23 States Secret Service is authorized to protect under 

24 section 3056 of this title or by Presidential memo-
4 

† HR 347 EAS 

1 randum, when such person has not declined such pro2 tection.’’. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H.R. 347 

AMENDMENT
### SUBCHAPTER VII—FBI TRAINING OF STATE AND LOCAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE PERSONNEL
### SUBCHAPTER II—PREVENTION OF INTIMIDATION
### SUBCHAPTER II—STUDY AND DESIGNATION OF TWO MILL TAILING SITES IN NEW MEXICO
[Civil No. 261.]

#### CHARLES W. BEACH, Appellee, v. FREDERICK GAINS, Appellant.

APPEAL from the District Court of the Third Judicial District in and for the County of Yavapai. James H. Wright, Judge.

Harris Baldwin, for Appellant.

Herndon & Hawkins, and E. M. Sanford, for Appellee.

January 19, 1889.

(Note hy Reporter.—The record shows, “Opinion filed,” hut none appears in the records of the office of the clerk of the supreme court.)

Affirmed.
### Part S—Health Care Quality Programs
|**OTHER LIABILITIES (Tables)**              | 12 Months Ended                                                                                                                                                                         
|------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|**Other Liabilities Disclosure [Abstract]** |                                                                                                                                                                                         
|Other Noncurrent Liabilities                | Other liabilities consisted of the following as of June 30:20182017Venture agreement terminal obligation, net$341$317Employee benefit obligations283298Taxes5242Other102113Total$778$770
|                                           
|                                            |                                                                                                                                                                                         
|                                            | 2018                                                                                                                                                                                    
|Venture agreement terminal obligation, net  | $                                                                                                                                                                                       
|Employee benefit obligations                | 283                                                                                                                                                                                     
|Taxes                                       | 52                                                                                                                                                                                      
|Other                                       | 102                                                                                                                                                                                     
|Total                                       | $                                                                                                                                                                                       

X- ReferencesNo definition available.
+ Details**Name:**
us-gaap_OtherLiabilitiesDisclosureAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**
us-gaap_**Data Type:**
xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**
na**Period Type:**
duration X- DefinitionTabular disclosure of other noncurrent liabilities.
+ ReferencesNo definition available.
+ Details**Name:**
us-gaap_OtherNoncurrentLiabilitiesTableTextBlock**Namespace Prefix:**
us-gaap_**Data Type:**
nonnum:textBlockItemType**Balance Type:**
na**Period Type:**
duration
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015 as
filed with the SEC on the date hereof, I, Chi-Wen Tsai, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 25, 2016



By:

/s/ Chi-Wen TsaiName:

Chi-Wen TsaiTitle:

Chief Executive Officer




|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### KREMER et al, Respondents v. PUBLIC DRUG COMPANY, Appellant.

(170 N. W. 959).

(File No. 4432.

Opinion filed February 11, 1919.)

Action by Frederick B. Kremer, et al, v. Public Drug Com*377pany, a corporation. From a judgment for plaintiffs, and from an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

See, Kremer et al, v. Public Drug Company, 41 S. D.- 170 N. W. 571

Selover, *Schultz & Selover,*and *H. G. Fuller,*for Appellant.

*Crawford & Crawford,*for Respondents.

SMITH, P. J.

The record presented upon this appeal is identical with that in the case of Frederick Kremer et al. v. Public Drug Co., a corporation, and this appeal is controlled by the decision in that case, which will be found in 170 N. W. 571.

Judgment of affirmance will be entered, as in that case. No costs to be taxed in this court.
### §4502. Payment

(a) Basis for Payment.—When practicable, payments under section 4501 of this title shall be made on any of the following bases:

(1) Performance measured by objective, quantifiable methods such as delivery of acceptable items, work measurement, or statistical process controls.

(2) Accomplishment of events defined in the program management plan.

(3) Other quantifiable measures of results.

(b) Payment Amount.—Payments made under section 4501 of this title may not exceed the unpaid contract price.

(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3791.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 4502(a) | 41:255(b). | June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title III, §305(b), as added Pub. L. 103–355, title II, §2051(b), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3304. |
| 4502(b) | 41:255(c). | June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title III, §305(c), 63 Stat. 396; July 12, 1952, ch. 703, §1(m), 66 Stat. 594; Pub. L. 85–800, §4, Aug. 28, 1958, 72 Stat. 966; Pub. L. 103–355, title II, §2051(a)(3), (5), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3304. |

Section
### UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

SECTOR POLICIES AND PROGRAMS DIVISION

OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY PLANNING AND STANDARDS

OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION



### MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: OAQPS Budget and Staffing Information

FROM: Allison Mayer

OAQPS/SPPD/FIG (E143

- 03)

TO: Coal Mines Docket (EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2013

- 0358)

DATE: April 30 , 2013

Below is a table sho wing OAQPS’s budget history, extramural funds , and staffing levels

f rom fiscal years 2006

- 2013

.

OAQPS Budget and Staffing Levels

Fiscal Year OAQPS Budget 1

(Millions) OAQPS Extramural

Funds 1 (Millions) FTE 3

2006 $77.2 $37.2 348.4

2007 $76.7 $35.2 340.4

2008 $73.1 $29.9 340.4

2009 $73.4 $28.1 340.4

2010 $75.1 $28.9 339.4

2011 $79.9 $25.7 355.9

2012 $74.3 $22.6 345.7

2013 $68.0 2 $21.2 2 345.7 4

Notes:

1 This information was obtained from Compass financial database unless otherwise noted

2 This estimate came from the March 7, 2013 Office of Budget Sequestration Planning Exercise

3 This information was obtained from the internal EPA FTE allocation spreadsheet distributed to offices

in EPA’s Office of Air and Radiation

4 Expected FTE, subject to change
#### § 18.13 Documentation of fees and expenses.

The application shall be accompanied by full documentation of the fees and expenses, including the cost of any study, analysis, engineering report, test, project, or similar matter for which an award is sought. A separate itemized statement shall be submitted for each professional firm or individual whose services are covered by the application, showing the hours spent in connection with the proceeding by each individual, a description of the specific services performed, the rate at which each fee has been computed, any expenses for which reimbursement is sought, the total amount claimed, and the total amount paid or payable by the applicant or by any other person or entity for the services provided. The adjudicative officer may require the applicant to provide vouchers, receipts, or other substantiation for any expenses claimed.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-60475 Summary Calendar

LOUIS DAVIS, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI; JOSEPH W. GEX; JAMES G. TUCKER, III; CHARLES E. WOOD; MISSISSIPPI BAR,

Defendants-Appellees.

_____________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:96CV190BrR

______________________________________

*********************************************

LOUIS DAVIS, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JAMES G. TUCKER, III,

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:96CV288BrR

_____________________________________June 20, 1997June 20, 1997

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4. Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM: *

Louis Davis, Jr., Mississippi prisoner #1642 5

, appeals the dismissal of his civil rights

complaint as frivolous. He has filed a motion for leave to proceed i n forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal.

The motion for leave to appeal IFP is GRANTED.

Davis is not required to pay an initial partial filing fee; however, he shall make monthly

payments of twenty percent of the preceding month’s income credited to his account. S ee 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(a). The agency having custody of Davis is directed to forward payments from his prisoner

account to the clerk of the district court each time the amount in his account exceeds $10 until the

filing fee is paid. See id

.

Davis’ trial and appellate counsel are private parties and therefore are not state actors under

42 U.S.C. § 1983. A dickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.

, 398 U.S. 144, 152 (1970); Hobbs v. Hawkins

, 968

F.2d 471, 480 (5th Cir. 1992). The state prosecutor i s entitled to absolute prosecutorial immunit y.

Boyd v. Biggers

, 31 F.3d 279, 285 (5th Cir. 1994). The State of Mississippi and the Mississippi Bar,

as an “arm” of the state, are absolutely immune from suit under the Eleventh Amendment. N ordgren

v. Hafter

, 789 F.2d 334, 336-37 (5th Cir.); Voisin’s Oyster House, Inc. v. Guidry

, 799 F.2d 183, 186

(5th Cir. 1986).

Davis’ appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d.

215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. S ee 5th Cir. R.

42.2. The motion to file supplemental briefs is DENIED.
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), the undersigned, Alan Woinski, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Gaming Venture Corp., U.S.A., (the "Company"),
does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10QSB for the three months ended March 31,
2005 of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

Date: May 13, 2005

By /s/Alan Woinski
   ----------------------
Alan Woinski
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
No. 89-1353.

#### R. W. Meyer, Inc. *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
### Part I—Research Administration and Operations
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 23, 2004)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 68110-68111]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25964]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[REG-208246-90]
RIN 1545-BD47


Allocation and Apportionment of Deductions for Charitable 
Contributions; Hearing Cancellation

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Cancellation of notice of public hearing on proposed 
rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document provides notice of cancellation of a public 
hearing on proposed regulations relating to the allocation and 
apportionment of charitable deductions.

DATES: The public hearing originally scheduled for Thursday, December 
2, 2004, at 10 a.m., is cancelled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Treena Garrett of the Publications and 
Regulations Branch, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and 
Administration) (202) 622-7180 (not a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A notice of proposed rulemaking and notice 
of public hearing that appeared in the Federal Register on Wednesday, 
July 28, 2004, (69 FR 44988), announced that

[[Page 68111]]

a public hearing was scheduled for Thursday, December 2, 2004, at 10 
a.m. in the IRS Auditorium, Internal Revenue Service Building, 1111 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The subject of the public 
hearing is proposed regulations under section 861 of the Internal 
Revenue Code. The public comment period for these proposed regulations 
expired on Tuesday, October 26, 2004. Outlines of oral comments were 
due on Tuesday, November 12, 2004.
    The notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing, 
instructed those interested in testifying at the public hearing to 
submit a request to speak and an outline of the topics to be addressed. 
As of Wednesday, November 17, 2004, no one has requested to speak. 
Therefore, the public hearing scheduled for Tuesday, December 2, 2004, 
is cancelled.

Cynthia E. Grigsby,
Acting Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing 
Division, Associate Chief Counsel, (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. 04-25964 Filed 11-22-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
### Part H–1—Stephanie Tubbs Jones Gift of Life Medal

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Part was enacted as part of the Stephanie Tubbs Jones Gift of Life Medal Act of 2008, and not as part of the Public Health Service Act which comprises this chapter.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Tabatha IV, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the
period ending June 30, 2004 (the "Report"), I, John Ballard, President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/John Ballard



 John Ballard,

 President and Chief Financial Officer

September 16, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL
                          FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bekem Metals, Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,
James Gunnell, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



Date: November 21, 2005                              /s/ James Gunnell
                                                   ---------------------------
                                                   James Gunnell,
                                                   Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM'S CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
DOBI Medical International, Inc. and Subsidiary on Form S-8, File No.333-121048
of our report, which includes an explanatory paragraph as to the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern, dated February 2, 2006, on our audits of
the consolidated financial statements of Dobi Medical International, Inc., as of
December 31, 2005 and for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, which
report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10KSB.



                            /s/ Marcum & Kliegman LLP

                                  New York, NY

                                February 9, 2006
No: III-14-017 May 12, 2014

CONTACT: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663

NRC Names New Resident Inspector at D.C. Cook Nuclear Station

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has selected Thomas Taylor as the new 

Resident Inspector at the D.C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant in Bridgman, Mich., 

approximately 13 miles south of Benton Harbor. The nuclear power facility is operated 

by Indiana Michigan Power Co.

Taylor joined the NRC as a reactor engineer in Region III in 2007. Before 

joining the NRC he enlisted in the Navy and received a bachelor’s degree in chemistry 

from the U.S. Naval Academy. He also earned a master’s of engineering management 

degree from Old Dominion University.

“Thomas Taylor’s training and commitment to safety will assist the NRC in fulfilling its mission 

to protect people, the environment, and workers. He will help ensure the D.C. Cook plant follows the 

high standards set by the NRC,” said Region III Administrator Cynthia D. Pederson.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear plant site has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They serve as 

the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major work projects and 

interacting with plant workers and the public. Taylor joins Senior Resident Inspector John Ellegood at 

the facility. Both inspectors can be reached at (269) 465-5353.
#### In the Matter of Peter T. Scott, Respondent, against Clifford J. Fletcher, as Commissioner of Motor Vehicles of the State of New York, Appellant.

*884Present — Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Deyo and Santry, JJ.