alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Unassociated Document


    SERVICES
      RENDERED AGREEMENT

    


    This
      Services Rendered Agreement is by and between Indigo-Energy, Inc.,
      (lEI), a Nevada
      Corporation located at 4041 University Drive, Suite 302, Fairfax, VA 22030,
      and
ML
      McVey
      (MLM), an individual located at, 2305 Bluff Rd SE, Roanoke, VA 24014
collectively
      referred to as "The Parties."

    


    WHEREAS,
      1131 is a developer of oil and gas properties, and

    


    WHEREAS,
      -MM has business: skills
      that
      were
      instrumental in assisting merging
      Procare with Indigo Land and
      Development.

    


    NOW,
      THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants provided herein,
      the Parties
      agree as follows:

    


    Services.

     

    MLM
      has
      performed
      certain
      duties
      for
      ProCare America
      and
      Indigo Land and Development
      in merging the two companies together.

    


    Compensation.
      IEI
      shall
      compensate MLM for these services as follows:

     

    1.
      MLM
will
      be
      allowed to purchase up to twelve million shares of IEI’s common stock at a price
      of $.0001 per share at any time through May 2006. Valuation is consistent with
      the book value of the company for a restricted share purchase. Such stock to
      be
      issued within 90 days of signing of this agreement and to be restricted by
      SEC
      rule 144.

    


    Termination. Either
      party may terminate this relationship, without cause, after the initial term
      of
      the Agreement, with thirty (30) days
      notice
      to
      the other, provided all compensation
      is current.

    


    Term.
      The
      term of this. agreement is for eight months starting August- 1;t200S.and ending
      March-1,
      2006

     

    Governing
      Law. This
      Agreement is being executed under and will be governed by the laws
      of
      the State of Nevada.

     

    
      
         

      

      
        I

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    

    


    IN
      WITNESS
      THEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement effective as of the
date
      signed below.

     

    
      	For
              Indigo-Energy,
              Inc.	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	\s\
              David Larson,
              President	 	 	3/1/06
	
              

            	 	 	Date
	David
              Larson,
              President	 	 	



    

    
      	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	3-1-06
	
              

            	 	 	Date
	ML
              McVey	 	 	 


    

     

    
      
         

      

      
        I
### §8712. Mayor of the District of Columbia

(a) Planning Responsibilities.—The Mayor of the District of Columbia is the central planning agency for the government of the District of Columbia in the National Capital and is responsible for coordinating the planning activities of the District government and for preparing and implementing the District elements of the comprehensive plan for the National Capital, which may include land use elements, urban renewal and redevelopment elements, a multiyear program of public works for the District, and physical, social, economic, transportation, and population elements. The Mayor's planning responsibility shall not extend to—

(1) federal or international projects and developments in the District, as determined by the National Capital Planning Commission; or

(2) the United States Capitol Buildings and Grounds as defined and described in sections 5101 and 5102 of this title, any extension of, or additions to, those Buildings and Grounds, and buildings and grounds under the care of the Architect of the Capitol.

(b) Participation and Consultation.—In carrying out the responsibilities under this section and section 8721 of this title, the Mayor shall establish procedures for citizen participation in the planning process and for appropriate meaningful consultation with any state or local government or planning agency in the National Capital region affected by any aspect of a comprehensive plan, including amendments, affecting or relating to the District.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1218; Pub. L. 109–284, §6(28), Sept. 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 1213.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8712 | 40:71a(a)(2). | June 6, 1924, ch. 270, §2(a)(2), as added July 19, 1952, ch. 949, §1, 66 Stat. 782; Pub. L. 93–198, title II, §203(a), Dec. 24, 1973, 87 Stat. 779. |

Section

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 109–284 inserted "of this title" after "sections 5101 and 5102".
IN RESPONSE, PLEASE 

REFER TO: M120601 

 June 11, 2012 

MEMORANDUM TO: R. W. Borchardt 

 Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Richard J. Laufer, Acting Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS – BRIEFING ON THE RESULTS OF 

THE AGENCY ACTION REVIEW MEETING, 8:30 A.M., FRIDAY, 

JUNE 1, 2012, COMMISSIONERS’ CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE 

WHITE FLINT NORTH, ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND (OPEN TO 

PUBLIC ATTENDANCE) 

The Commission was briefed by the NRC staff on the results of its annual Agency Action 

Review Meeting (AARM) regarding licensee performance held on April 25, 2012. In addition, 

representatives of Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) briefed the Commission on the Browns 

Ferry Integrated Improvement Plan. TVA was represented by Preston Swafford, Chief Nuclear 

Officer and Executive Vice President, Nuclear Power Group; Robert Whalen, Vice President, 

Nuclear Engineering; Timothy Cleary, Vice President, Regulatory Recovery Projects; and Keith 

Polson, Site Vice President, Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3. 

There were no requirements identified for staff action. 

cc: Chairman Jaczko 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Apostolakis 

 Commissioner Magwood 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA 

 OIG 

 OPA 

 Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR
#### Edgar S. Appleby and Others v. The City of New York.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. See memorandum per curiam. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
### SUBCHAPTER XI—DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Cite as 2015 Ark. 260



## SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-15-407 PHILLIP ENGLES PETITIONER V.
CIRCUIT COURT OF BOONE COUNTY RESPONDENT Opinion Delivered June 4, 2015 PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

REMANDED TO SETTLE THE RECORD.

PER CURIAM Petitioner Phillip Engles petitions this court for a writ of certiorari to the respondent, the Circuit Court of Boone County. The petition arises from the circuit court’s order denying his motion to dismiss based on violation of the speedy-trial provisions of Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 28 (2014). In his petition, Engles asserts that he was arrested on December 3, 2012, and filed his motion to dismiss on April 6, 2015. Following a hearing on Engles’s motion, the circuit court denied it, finding that the time period of August 25, 2014, through October 6, 2014, was tolled for good cause. At the hearing on Engles’s motion, the circuit court indicated that, in making its ruling, it had taken notice of certain letters in the “clerk’s file” that were dated during the time period at issue; however, those letters, while shown on the circuit court’s docket sheet, are not included in the record before us, and we are unable to determine whether they were made a part of the record at the hearing on Engles’s motion. While the State’s response isCite as 2015 Ark. 260

somewhat vague, it does reference that the good cause found by the circuit court was based on a recusal by the original trial judge. Not having the letters on which the circuit court relied, we are unable to review the merits of Engles’s petition. We therefore remand the matter to settle the record. Remanded to settle the record.

2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Tabatha V, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the
period ending June 30, 2003 (the "Report"), I, John Ballard, President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/John Ballard



 John Ballard,

 President and Chief Financial Officer

May 27, 2004
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

We hereby consentto the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3(file Nos. 333-66460, 333-82762 and 333-111519) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-41374,333-49978, 333-102741, 333-115988 and 333-133974) of Network Engines, Inc. ofour report dated December 11, 2006, relating to the consolidated financialstatements, financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting which appears inthis Form 10-K.
| /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
|                           |
| Boston, Massachusetts          |
| December 14, 2006              |

 

1

----
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 227 (Friday, November 26, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 68782]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26101]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2004-18824; Airspace Docket No. 04-ACE-50]


Modification of Class D Airspace; and Modification of Class E 
Airspace; Joplin, MO

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of the direct final 
rule which revises Class D and Class E airspace at Joplin, MO.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, January 20, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda Mumper, Air Traffic Division, 
Airspace Branch, ACE-520A, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal 
Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: 
(816) 329-2524.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on September 29, 
2004 (69 FR 58047). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure 
for a non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be 
no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public 
that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written 
adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an 
adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the 
regulation would become effective on January 20, 2005. No adverse 
comments were received, and thus this notice confirms that this direct 
final rule will become effective on that date.

    Issued in Kansas City, MO on November 8, 2004.
Anthony D. Roetzel,
Acting Area Director, Western Flight Services Operations.
[FR Doc. 04-26101 Filed 11-24-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
#### Metropolitan By-Products Company, Inc., Appellant, v. William P. Langevin and Another, Respondents, Impleaded with Roger P. Doyle and Others, Defendants.

(Appeal No. 1.)

— Motion to resettle order granted, and resettled order signed. Present — Thomas, Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ.
### Part A—Domestic Supply
Certification of the
Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002



In
connection with the annual report of Worldwide Energy and Manufacturing USA,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), Jimmy Wang, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/
Jimmy Wang

Chief
Executive Officer

Date:  May
19, 2008
### **CHAPTER 175—FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE EXPENDITURE CONTROL**

Sec.
17501.
Definitions.
17502.
Monitoring system.
17503.
Data collection.
17504.
Agency statements with respect to motor vehicle use.
17505.
Presidential report.
17506.
Reduction of storage and disposal costs.
17507.
Savings.
17508.
Compliance.
17509.
Applicability.
17510.
Cooperation.
### §3503. Revolving fund

(a) Establishment.—There is a revolving fund established by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to provide amounts for advances under this chapter. The fund comprises amounts appropriated under this chapter and all repayments and other receipts received in connection with advances made under this chapter.

(b) Authorizations.—Not more than $70,000,000 may be appropriated to the revolving fund as necessary to carry out the purposes of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1168.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3503 | 40:462(e). | Aug. 2, 1954, ch. 649, title VII, §702(e), 68 Stat. 641; Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 783, title I, §112, 69 Stat. 641; Pub. L. 87–70, title V, §502(3), (4), June 30, 1961, 75 Stat. 175; Pub. L. 88–560, title VI, §602(a), Sept. 2, 1964, 78 Stat. 799; Pub. L. 89–117, title XI, §1104, Aug. 10, 1965, 79 Stat. 503; Pub. L. 90–19, §10(a) (related to 40:462), May 25, 1967, 81 Stat. 22. |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "heretofore or hereafter" are omitted as unnecessary. The text of 40:462(e)(2) is omitted as obsolete. Title V of the War Mobilization and Reconversion Act of 1944 (50 App.:1671) terminated on June 30, 1947. The Act of October 13, 1949 (40:451 et seq.) authorized the Housing and Home Finance Administrator to make certain loans and advances for the 2-year period immediately following October 13, 1951.

In subsection (b), the words "in addition to amounts authorized to be appropriated for the purposes of this section before September 2, 1964" are omitted as executed.
#### § 971.427 Processing outside the United States.

If appropriate TCRs will incorporate provisions to implement the decision of the Administrator regarding the return of resources processed outside the United States, in accordance with § 971.408.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 30, 2020

No. 04-20-00494-CV

AMERICAN MEDICAL HOME HEALTH SERVICES, LLC, Hub City Home Health, Inc. 

d/b/a American Medical Home Health Services, American Medical Home Health Services San 

Antonio, LLC, American Medical Hospice Care, LLC, American Medical Palliative Support, 

LLC, Magdalena (Maggie) Clemente, Rene Estrada, and Gina Trevino,

Appellants

v.

LEGACY HOME HEALTH AGENCY, INC. and Legacy Home Care Services, Inc. d/b/a All 

Seasons Home Care, Inc.,

Appellees

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-CI-09053

Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The hearing set for January 4, 2021, on the Plaintiffs' Motion For Enforcement of 

Temporary Injunctions and Motion For Sanctions is stayed until further order of this court. See 

Tex. R. App. P. 29.4.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 30th day of December, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
#### § 1019.3 General requirements for notifying the Commission.

Not less than 30 days before exporting any noncomplying goods described in § 1019.1(b), the exporter must file a statement with the Consumer Product Safety Commission, as described in §§ 1019.4 and 1019.5 of this subpart A. The exporter need not notify the Commission about the export of items described in § 1019.1 (c), (d), or (e). As described in § 1019.5, the exporter may request the Commission to allow the statement to be filed between 10 and 29 days before the intended export, and the request may be granted for good cause.
Third Amendment to the Trust Agreement dated May 8, 1996



 Exhibit 10.169 
 THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE TRUST AGREEMENT 
 FOR THE CHARLES SCHWAB 
 PROFIT SHARING AND EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN 
 The Trust Agreement for the Charles Schwab Profit Sharing and Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“Plan”), which was amended and restated in its entirety effective November 1, 1990, and further amended
effective January 1, 1992 and July 1, 1992, is hereby amended as follows, effective as of January 1, 1996: 
 The fifth
sentence of Section 5.05(f) is amended to read as follows: 
 Any allocated Employer Securities with respect to which Participants are
entitled to issue directions pursuant to the foregoing and for which such directions are not received by the Purchasing Agent shall be voted by the Purchasing Agent in the same proportion as the shares of Employer Securities for which Participant
voting instructions have been received. 
  

			
	 CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC.

		
	 By:
	 	 /S/ Luis E. Valencia

	 Its:
	 	CAO
	 Date:
	 	 May 8, 1996

	
	 THE CHARLES SCHWAB TRUST COMPANY

		
	 By:
	 	 /S/ Richard R. Tinervin

	 Its:
	 	President and CEO
	 Date:
	 	 May 3, 1996
§ 16.6 Establishment of fees and charges. ( a ) The Secretary in conjunction with the use of the Working Capital Fund of the National Institute of Standards & Technology, as authorized under section 12 of the Act of March 3, 1901, as amended (15 U.S.C. 278b), for this program, shall establish fees and charges for use of the Department of Commerce Label and Mark on each product. Such fees and charges shall be related to the number of units of products labeled, where appropriate. The fees and charges established by the Secretary, which may be revised by her when she deems it appropriate to do so, shall be in amounts calculated to make the operation of this program as self-sufficient as reasonable. A separate notice will be published in the Federal Register simultaneously with the notice of each proposed Specification referred to in § 16.5(a). Such notice will set out a schedule of estimated fees and charges the Secretary proposes to establish. The notice would be furnished for informational and guidance purposes only in order that the public may evaluate the proposed Specification in light of the expected fees to be charged.
( b ) At such time as the Secretary publishes the notice announcing the final Specification referred to in § 16.5(c)(1), she shall simultaneously publish a separate notice in the Federal Register setting forth the final schedule of fees that will be charged participants in the program. The effective date of such final schedule of fees shall be the same as the date on which the final Specification takes effect.
( c ) Revisions, if any, to the fees and charges established by the Secretary under paragraph (b) of this section shall be published in subsequent Federal Register notices and shall take effect not less than thirty (30) days after the date of publication of such notice.
( d ) The establishment of fees and charges under this section may, at any time, be suspended by the Secretary for any length of time.
[42 FR 26648, May 25, 1977, as amended at 42 FR 57686, Nov. 4, 1977; 55 FR 38315, Sept. 18, 1990]
### §1302. Lease of buildings

Except as otherwise specifically provided by law, the leasing of buildings and property of the Federal Government shall be for a money consideration only. The lease may not include any provision for the alteration, repair, or improvement of the buildings or property as a part of the consideration for the rent to be paid for the use and occupation of the buildings or property. Money derived from the rent shall be deposited in the Treasury as miscellaneous receipts.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1131.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1302 | 40:303b. | June 30, 1932, ch. 314, §321, 47 Stat. 412. |

Section

The words "On and after June 30, 1932" are omitted as obsolete.
### subpart 3—grants for research on voting technology improvements
Exhibit 32.1




REGENOCELL THERAPEUTICS, INC.
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE SARBANNES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of RegenoCELL Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”), I, James F. Mongiardo, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ James F. MongiardoJames F. MongiardoChief Executive Officerand

Chief Financial Officer




May 23, 2011
#### Mary E. Collins, Appellant, v. Joseph Zoladz, Doing Business under the Name of Joseph Zoladz Lumber Company, et al., Respondents.

Judgment insofar as it dismisses the complaint as to defendant Niagara Frontier Transit System, Inc., affirmed, with costs; judgment insofar as it dismisses the complaint as to Joseph Zoladz, Doing Business under the Name of Joseph Zoladz Lumber Company, reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the evidence presented questions of fact as to that defendant’s negligence. All concur, Piper, J., not voting. (Appeal from a judgment of Erie Trial Term, dismissing the complaint as to both defendants in a bus line negligence action.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Piper, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ.