alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3691A. Withdrawal or leave of absence from certain education

(a) In General.—(1) A covered member may, after receiving orders to enter a period of covered service, withdraw or take a leave of absence from covered education.

(2)(A) The institution concerned may not take any adverse action against a covered member on the basis that such covered member withdraws or takes a leave of absence under paragraph (1).

(B) Adverse actions under subparagraph (A) include the following:

(i) The assignment of a failing grade to a covered member for covered education.

(ii) The reduction of the grade point average of a covered member for covered education.

(iii) The characterization of any absence of a covered member from covered education as unexcused.

(iv) The assessment of any financial penalty against a covered member.

(b) Withdrawal.—If a covered member withdraws from covered education under subsection (a), the institution concerned shall refund all tuition and fees (including payments for housing) for the academic term from which the covered member withdraws.

(c) Leave of Absence.—If a covered member takes a leave of absence from covered education under subsection (a), the institution concerned shall—

(1) assign a grade of "incomplete" (or equivalent) to the covered member for covered education for the academic term from which the covered member takes such leave of absence; and

(2) to the extent practicable, permit the covered member, upon completion of the period covered service, to complete such academic term.

(d) Definitions.—In this section:

(1) The term "covered education" means a course of education—

(A) at an institution of higher education; and

(B) paid for with educational assistance furnished under a law administered by the Secretary.

(2) The term "covered member" means a member of the Armed Forces (including the reserve components) enrolled in covered education.

(3) The term "covered service" means—

(A) active service or inactive-duty training, as such terms are defined in section 101 of title 10; or

(B) State active duty, as defined in section 4303 of this title.

(4) The term "institution concerned" means, with respect to a covered member, the institution of higher education where the covered member is enrolled in covered education.

(5) The term "institution of higher education" has the meaning given such term in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001).

(6) The term "period of covered service" means the period beginning on the date on which a covered member enters covered service and ending on the date on which the covered member is released from covered service or dies while in covered service.

(Added Pub. L. 117–328, div. U, title II, §216(a), Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5455.)
#### Elizabeth E. Thompson, Appellant, v. Board of Education of the City of Syracuse, Respondent.

All concur. (Appeal from a judgment of Onondaga County Court, Breed, J., affirming a judgment of Syracuse Municipal Court, Skerritt, J., dismissing plaintiff’s complaint, in an action to recover an alleged unpaid balance of plaintiff’s salary as a teacher in defendant's schools.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ. [See *post,*p. 844.]
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Harry L. Markell, Respondent, for Compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Law, v. Daniel Green Felt Shoe Company, Employer, and American Mutual Compensation Insurance Company, Insurance Carrier, Appellants.

Award affirmed on the authority of *Matter of Heitz*v. *Ruppert*(218 N. Y. 148). All concurred; Lyon, J., in result.
§ 1105.4 Eligibility. In order to be eligible to receive a financial contribution, a participant must request in advance a specific contribution with an explanation as to why the contribution is likely to result in a more satisfactory standard than would be developed without a contribution. The request for a contribution shall contain, to the fullest extent possible and appropriate, the following information: ( a ) A description of the point of view, interest and/or expertise that the participant intends to bring to the proceeding;
( b ) The reason(s) that representation of the participant's interest, point of view, or expertise can reasonably be expected to contribute substantially to a full and fair determination of the issues involved in the proceeding;
( c ) An explanation of the economic interest, if any, that the participant has (and individuals or groups comprising the participant have) in any Commission determination related to the proceeding;
( d ) A discussion, with supporting documentation, of the reason(s) a participant is unable to participate effectively in the proceeding without a financial contribution;
( e ) A description of the participant's employment or organization, as appropriate; and
( f ) A specific and itemized estimate of the costs for which the contribution is sought.
§ 1034.160 Communications. ( a ) The agency shall take appropriate steps to ensure effective communication with applicants, participants, personnel of other Federal entities, and members of the public. ( 1 ) The agency shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids where necessary to afford a handicapped person an equal opportunity to participate in, and enjoy the benefits of, a program or activity conducted by the agency. ( i ) In determining what type of auxiliary aid is necessary, the agency shall give primary consideration to the requests of the handicapped person.
( ii ) The agency need not provide individually prescribed devices, readers for personal use or study, or other devices of a personal nature.
( 2 ) Where the agency communicates with applicants and beneficiaries by telephone, telecommunication devices for deaf persons (TDD's) or equally effective telecommunication systems shall be used.
( b ) The agency shall ensure that interested persons, including persons with impaired vision or hearing, can obtain information as to the existence and location of accessible services, activities, and facilities.
( c ) The agency shall provide signage at a primary entrance to each of its inaccessible facilities, directing users to a location at which they can obtain information about accessible facilities. The international symbol for accessibility shall be used at each primary entrance of an accessible facility.
( d ) This section does not require the agency to take any action that it can demonstrate would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of a program or activity or in undue financial and administrative burdens. In those circumstances where agency personnel believe that the proposed action would fundamentally alter the program or activity or would result in undue financial and administrative burdens, the agency has the burden of proving that compliance with § 1034.160 would result in such alteration or burdens. The decision that compliance would result in such alteration or burdens must be made by the agency head or his or her designee after considering all agency resources available for use in the funding and operation of the conducted program or activity, and must be accompanied by a written statement of the reasons for reaching that conclusion. If an action required to comply with this section would result in such an alteration or such burdens, the agency shall take any other action that would not result in such an alteration or such burdens but would nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, handicapped persons receive the benefits and services of the program or activity.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2254 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2254

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 1101 Colorado Street in Boulder City, Nevada, as the ``Bruce 
                    Woodbury Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 22, 2003

 Mr. Porter (for himself, Mr. Gibbons, and Ms. Berkley) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government 
                                 Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 1101 Colorado Street in Boulder City, Nevada, as the ``Bruce 
                    Woodbury Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BRUCE WOODBURY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1101 Colorado Street in Boulder City, Nevada, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Bruce Woodbury Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Bruce 
Woodbury Post Office Building.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods indicated.
  Dated: February 10, 2009
    /s/ BRET W. JOHNSENBret W. JohnsenSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer
January 10, 2006


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 - Fifth Street - N.W.
Washington, DC  20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

This letter authorizes the following representatives of The Clorox Company,
acting singly, to execute and file with you on my behalf future Forms 3,
4 and 5 respecting my holdings of equity securities of The Clorox Company:

Laura Stein, Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary
Angela Hilt, Senior Corporate Counsel
Cheryl Brice, Assistant Secretary

Sincerely,


/s/ Robert W. Matschullat
Name:  Robert W. Matschullat
Title:  Presiding Director
February 22, 2011

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2006-26068

Mr. Donald Dillman

American Airlines

P.O. Box 619617 DFW Airport, TX 75261

Dear Mr. Dillman:

On July 23, 2007, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) granted American Airlines (American) an exemption from §§ 121.391(a) and 121.393(b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). Exemption No. 9411 allowed American to substitute a pilot for one required flight attendant crewmember during boarding at an intermediate stop and to reduce the number of required flight attendants on board during the deplaning of passengers at an intermediate stop, subject to certain conditions and limitations. This exemption terminated on July 31, 2009.

On the date the exemption was scheduled to terminate, the FAA was actively engaged in rulemaking regarding revisions to crewmember requirements when passengers are onboard an airplane. The FAA found it appropriate to extend the exemption while rulemaking efforts were completed. Therefore, the FAA extended the termination date of Exemption No. 9411 to July 31, 2011, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

On November 5, 2010, the FAA published a final rule (Crewmember Requirements When Passengers are Onboard) regarding crewmember requirements when passengers are onboard an airplane, which became effective January 4, 2011 (75 FR 68189) (copy enclosed). The final rule substantially addresses the relief granted in Exemption No. 9411. Therefore, the FAA is rescinding Exemption No. 9411A on April 29, 2011.2 A copy of this letter will be placed onto the docket (Docket No. FAA-2006-26068).

Sincerely,

/s/ Raymond Towles Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service

Enclosure
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods indicated.
  Dated: May 8, 2007
    /s/ Simon BiddiscombeSimon BiddiscombeSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary and Treasurer
#### § 930.91 Federal assistance.

The term “federal assistance” means assistance provided under a federal program to an applicant agency through grant or contractual arrangements, loans, subsidies, guarantees, insurance, or other form of financial aid.
#### Anna Kraus, Respondent, v. Lena Halpern, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion.- Present — Clarke, P. J., Scott, Smith, Page and Davis, JJ.
#### Francis A. Weisbecker and Others, Respondents, v. Muller Paper Goods Company, Inc., Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 340 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 340

 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to remove the exclusion 
    from medical assistance under the Medicaid Program of items and 
      services for patients in an institution for mental diseases.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 19, 2011

Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas introduced the following bill; which 
          was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to remove the exclusion 
    from medical assistance under the Medicaid Program of items and 
      services for patients in an institution for mental diseases.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF MEDICAID EXCLUSION FROM MEDICAL ASSISTANCE OF 
              ITEMS AND SERVICES FURNISHED TO PATIENTS IN AN 
              INSTITUTION FOR MENTAL DISEASES.

    (a) In General.--The first sentence of section 1905(a) of the 
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d(a)) is amended, in the matter 
following paragraph (29)--
            (1) by striking ``such term does not include--'' and ``(A) 
        any'' and inserting ``such term does not include any'';
            (2) by striking ``; or'' and inserting a period; and
            (3) by striking subparagraph (B).
    (b) Conforming Amendments To Permit Medical Assistance for IMD 
Patients Under 65 Years of Age.--The following provisions of such Act 
are each amended by striking ``65 years of age or older'' each place it 
appears:
            (1) Paragraphs (20) and (21) of section 1902(a) (42 U.S.C. 
        1396b(a)).
            (2) Section 1905(a)(14) (42 U.S.C. 1396d(a)(14)).
            (3) Section 1919(d)(7)(B)(i)(I) (42 U.S.C. 
        1396r(d)(7)(B)(i)(I)).
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on October 1, 2011, and shall apply to items and services 
furnished on or after such date.
                                 <all>
```
### SUBCHAPTER IV—GRANTS TO STATES FOR AID AND SERVICES TO NEEDY FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN AND FOR CHILD-WELFARE SERVICES

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 90–248, title II, §240(a), Jan. 2, 1968, 81 Stat. 911, inserted "AND FOR CHILD-WELFARE SERVICES" at end of subchapter heading.

Pub. L. 87–543, title I, §104(a)(1), July 25, 1962, 76 Stat. 185, substituted "AID AND SERVICES TO NEEDY FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN" for "AID TO DEPENDENT CHILDREN" in subchapter heading.
### subpart 9—national eye institute
### SUBCHAPTER I—THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM
#### Burgraf v. Reynolds et al.

November 25, 1947.

R. Monroe Fields, Judge.

V. R. Bentley for appellant.

P. B. Stratton and J. E. Childers for appellees.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Cammack

— Affirming.

A. E. Justice died testate in 1940. He left surviving him his widow, Yicy E. Justice, and eight children. Mrs. Yicy Justice died testate in 1943. She left her daughter, the appellant Dixie Burgraf, $1.00, and de*105vised the remainder of her property to the other children. Following the death of her mother the appellant instituted this action to recover her interest in certain mineral rights which she had conveyed to her father and mother in 1936 upon an alleged oral promise that they were to devise or reconvey those rights back to her. The only evidence offered by the appellant was her own deposition, which was stricken upon the ground that she should not be permitted to testify as to transactions with her deceased father under subsection 2, section 606, of the Civil Code of Practice. The appeal is from a judgment dismissing the appellant’s petition.

In 1930, Mr. and Mrs. Justice conveyed to their' eight children the mineral rights in a 100 acre tract of land in consideration of love and affection. Apparently being of the opinion that he had not reserved sufficient estate for the maintenance of himself and his wife, Mr. Justice went to his children in 1936 and asked them to reconvey the mineral rights. This was done. Mrs. Burgraf alleged that her father assured her that if she would sign the deed he would reconvey the mineral rights to her, but that he either failed or refused to do so, and it was not until after the death of her mother in 1943 that she learned that her interest in the mineral rights was not to be reconveyed to her.

We think Mrs. Burgraf failed to establish a resulting or constructive trust. Clear and convincing proof is required to establish such a trust. Bank of Clarkson v. Meredith, 301 Ky. 671, 192 S. W. 2d 967. Even considering her testimony, which was properly stricken, we find nothing to show that she was in any manner overreached. Her parents had given her an interest in the mineral rights in the 100 acre tract, and there is nothing to show that she raised any objection to joining with her brothers and sisters to reconvey those rights in 1936. The 1936 deed contained no restrictive provisions and the transaction was not an unreasonable one.

Should Mrs. Burgraf be permitted to testify as to the transactions with her deceased father, it would open the door for an attack upon any deed made under circumstances similar to those here involved. There is nothing to show that any undue influence was brought *106upon her by her father, nor do we view the execution of the deed in any sense as an unnatural act.

For the reasons given we think the judgment should be and it is affirmed.
Exhibit 32

Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, James N. Ryan, the Chief Executive Officer of Petroleum Development Corporation, the managing general partner of PDC 2002-C Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"),  hereby certify that: 

- I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Partnership (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;
- the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

_  _/s/ James N. Ryan                                

Name: James N. Ryan

Title: Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 12, 2003
### §3103. Admission of guide dogs or other service animals accompanying individuals with disabilities

(a) In General.—Guide dogs or other service animals accompanying individuals with disabilities and especially trained and educated for that purpose shall be admitted to any building or other property owned or controlled by the Federal Government on the same terms and conditions, and subject to the same regulations, as generally govern the admission of the public to the property. The animals are not permitted to run free or roam in a building or on the property and must be in guiding harness or on leash and under the control of the individual at all times while in a building or on the property.

(b) Regulations.—The head of each department or other agency of the Government may prescribe regulations the individual considers necessary in the public interest to carry out this section as it applies to any building or other property subject to the individual's jurisdiction.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1143.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3103(a) | 40:291 (1st sentence). | Dec. 10, 1941, ch. 563, 55 Stat. 796. |
| 3103(b) | 40:291 (last sentence). | |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "Seeing-eye dogs or other" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "or other service animals" are added, and the words "individuals with disabilities" are substituted for "blind masters", because of section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794) and Part 39 of Title 28 of the Code of Federal Regulations, which expanded the coverage of the source provision to all service animals and to all individuals with disabilities.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bayview Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  November 15, 2004





/s/ Luigi Federico

---------------------------------------

Luigi Federico, President and C.E.O.

(Principal Executive Officer)
#### § 1112.30 What is the purpose of this subpart?

This subpart establishes the audit requirements for third party conformity assessment bodies pursuant to section 14(i)(1) of the Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA) (15 U.S.C. 2063(i)(1)). Compliance with these requirements is a condition of the continuing accreditation of such third party conformity assessment bodies pursuant to section 14(a)(3)(C) of the CPSA. However, this subpart does not apply to certifying organizations under the Labeling of Hazardous Art Materials Act, even if such organizations are third party conformity assessment bodies.
### SUBCHAPTER IV—ENERGY INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION
#### § 754.2 [Reserved]