alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC Form 830A (04-10-2024)

Name of individual and licensee making the 

notification; address and telephone number:

NRC FORM 830A

(04-10-2024)

10 CFR 110.50(c)(3)(ii)

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY OMB: NO. 3150-0036 EXPIRES: 04/30/2027 

SOURCE

1

ACTIVITY (TBq) MAKE MODEL SERIAL NUMBER

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

REPORT OF IMPORT 

CONTINUATION SHEET

ADVANCED NOTIFICATION OF 

SHIPMENT OF CATEGORY 1 AND/OR 2 

RADIOACTIVE SOURCES 

In accordance with 10 CFR Part 110.50(c)(3)(ii) 

of the U.S. NRC Regulations

PAGE NUMBER: OF

SEND COMPLETED FORM TO:

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 

ATTN: Headquarters Operation Center 

Email: hoo.hoc@nrc.gov (Preferred Reporting Method) 

Fax: (301) 816-5151 (Alternative Reporting Method) Reference Number:

Estimated burden per response to comply with this mandatory collection request: 30 minutes. This form 

allows the NRC to request additional information from licensees to determine whether a license should be 

revoked, suspended, or modified. Send comments regarding burden estimate to the FOIA, Library, and 

Information Collections Branch, (T-6 A10M), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 

20555-001, or by email to Infocollects.Resource@nrc.gov, and to the and the OMB reviewer at: OMB Office 

of Information and Regulatory Affairs, (3150-0036), Attn: Desk Officer for the Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission, 725 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20503. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a 

person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the document requesting or requiring 

the collection displays a currently valid OMB control number.
### Part B—Assistance for Migrant, and Other Seasonally Employed Farmworkers and Their Families
### Part C—Scholarships
#### Manocraft Clothes, Inc., v. Simon Gittelmacher.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied with $10 costs. Motion for a stay granted, pending the granting or final refusal by the Court of Appeals of leave to appeal, upon appellant’s filing the undertaking prescribed by section 593 of the Civil Practice Act. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 887.]
Editorial Note on Part 922
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

§ 922.160 Purpose. ( a ) The purpose of the regulations in this subpart is to implement the comprehensive management plan for the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary by regulating activities affecting the resources of the Sanctuary or any of the qualities, values, or purposes for which the Sanctuary is designated, in order to protect, preserve and manage the conservation, ecological, recreational, research, educational, historical, and aesthetic resources and qualities of the area. In particular, the regulations in this part are intended to protect, restore, and enhance the living resources of the Sanctuary, to contribute to the maintenance of natural assemblages of living resources for future generations, to provide places for species dependent on such living resources to survive and propagate, to facilitate to the extent compatible with the primary objective of resource protection all public and private uses of the resources of the Sanctuary not prohibited pursuant to other authorities, to reduce conflicts between such compatible uses, and to achieve the other policies and purposes of the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary and Protection Act and the National Marine Sanctuaries Act.
( b ) Section 304(e) of the NMSA requires the Secretary to review management plans and regulations every five years, and make necessary revisions. Upon completion of the five year review of the Sanctuary management plan and regulations, the Secretary will repropose the regulations in their entirety with any proposed changes thereto, including those regulations in subparts A and E of this part that apply to the Sanctuary. The Governor of the State of Florida will have the opportunity to review the re-proposed regulations before they take effect and if the Governor certifies such regulations as unacceptable, they will not take effect in State waters of the Sanctuary.
Second Department,

January, 1948.

(January 12, 1948.)

#### Atlantic & Pacific Packing Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Isidore Weinstein, Doing Business as Weinstein’s Food Stores, Appellant.

The motion for reargument of the motion to reargue *(ante,*p. 785) the appeal will he deemed a motion to reopen plaintiff’s default in serving an amended complaint within the time allowed by the order of this court entered November 25, 1947 (272 App. Div. 1073). The motion is granted and plaintiff’s time to serve an amended complaint is extended until ten days after the entry of the order hereon, on condition that within said ten days plaintiff pay to defendant $30 costs; otherwise the motion is denied, with $10 costs. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.
§ 1.95 Procedures upon election. ( a ) After receipt of the notification of election to apply the procedures of this section pursuant to § 1.93, the Commission shall promptly assess such penalty as it deems appropriate, in accordance with § 1.97.
( b ) If the civil penalty has not been paid within 60 calendar days after the assessment order has been issued under paragraph (a) of this section, the General Counsel, unless otherwise directed, shall institute an action in the appropriate district court of the United States for an order enforcing the assessment of the civil penalty.
( c ) Any election to have this section apply may not be revoked except with the consent of the Commission.
§ 8a.435 Employment assistance to students. ( a ) *Assistance by recipient in making available outside employment.* A recipient that assists any agency, organization, or person in making employment available to any of its students: ( 1 ) Shall assure itself that such employment is made available without discrimination on the basis of sex; and
( 2 ) Shall not render such services to any agency, organization, or person that discriminates on the basis of sex in its employment practices.
( b ) *Employment of students by recipients.* A recipient that employs any of its students shall not do so in a manner that violates §§ 8a.500 through 8a.550.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Qing Yu, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[820 NYS2d 868]

Lahtinen, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 28, 2004, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she failed to comply with registration requirements.

Claimant worked as a salesperson for a cosmetics company for approximately seven months until she was separated from her employment in June 2004 under circumstances not at issue herein. She thereafter submitted a claim for unemployment insurance benefits in August 2004, with an effective date of July 26, 2004. Contending that her employer had failed to advise her that she was entitled to receive benefits immediately following *1096her separation from work, claimant subsequently requested that her claim be back-dated to June 28, 2004. In a decision filed on December 28, 2004, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board denied claimant’s request on the basis that she did not comply with registration requirements. Claimant appeals.

While claimant’s appeal was being perfected, she was paid the maximum amount of unemployment insurance benefits allowable for the given year. Thereafter, the Commissioner of Labor asked that the Board reopen and reconsider its December 28, 2004 decision disallowing back-dating of the claim, specifically seeking to withdraw its previous determination that claimant had failed to comply with registration requirements and, therefore, was ineligible for benefits effective June 28, 2004. In so moving, the Commissioner noted that such action would not result in any additional benefits being paid to claimant as she had already received the maximum amount allowed. The Board granted the Commissioner’s application and rescinded its December 28, 2004 decision.

Inasmuch as the decision by which claimant contends on this appeal to be aggrieved has been fully rescinded by the Board, this matter has been rendered moot *(see Matter of Batavia Enclosures [Commissioner of Labor],*267 AD2d 671, 671 [1999]; *Matter of Greenbaum [Commissioner of Labor],*257 AD2d 931, 932 [1999]; *Matter of Moore [County of Monroe*— Hartnett], 155 AD2d 721, 721 [1989]). To that end, upon review of the record, we find no circumstances warranting the application of the exception to the mootness doctrine *(see Matter of Batavia Enclosures [Commissioner of Labor], supra*at 671).

Crew III, J.P., Carpinello, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
#### Audrey L. Franklin, Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 30509.)

—Judgment affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur. (Appeal from a judgment dismissing a claim for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by claimant by reason of her having been burned during a fire in the Kensington-Fillmore Veteran Emergency Housing Project at Buffalo.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kim-ball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.
§ 1061.8 Information on the heightened degree of protection afforded. An application for an exemption from preemption shall also contain information demonstrating that the State or local requirement provides a significantly higher degree of protection from the risk of injury or illness than the preempting Commission statute, standard, or regulation. More specifically, an application shall contain: ( a ) A description of the risk of injury or illness addressed by the State or local requirement.
( b ) A detailed explanation of the State or local requirement and its rationale.
( c ) An analysis of differences between the State or local requirement and the Commission statute, standard, or regulation.
( d ) A detailed explanation of the State or local test method and its rationale.
( e ) Information comparing available test results for the Commission statute, standard, or regulation and the State or local requirement.
( f ) Information to show hazard reduction as a result of the State or local requirement, including injury data and results of accident simulation.
( g ) Any other information that is relevant to applicant's contention that the State or local requirement provides a significantly higher degree of protection than does the Commission statute, standard, or regulation.
( h ) Information regarding enforcement of the State or local requirement and sanctions that could be imposed for noncompliance.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 344 

To amend the Federal Reserve Act to remove the power of Federal reserve 

banks to buy and sell municipal securities, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 19, 2011 

Mr. NEUGEBAUER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Reserve Act to remove the power 

of Federal reserve banks to buy and sell municipal securities, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fiscal Responsibility 

5 Effective Enforcement Act of 2011’’ or the ‘‘FREE Act 

6 of 2011’’. 

7 SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF POWER TO BUY AND SELL MUNICIPAL 

8 SECURITIES. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 14(b)(1) of the Federal 

10 Reserve Act is amended by striking ‘‘and bills, notes, revVerDate Mar 15 2010 03:57 Jan 20, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H344.IH H344

pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 344 IH

1 enue bonds, and warrants with a maturity from date of 

2 purchase of not exceeding six months, issued in anticipa3 tion of the collection of taxes or in anticipation of the re4 ceipt of assured revenues by any State, county, district, 

5 political subdivision, or municipality in the continental 

6 United States, including irrigation, drainage and reclama7 tion districts,’’. 

8 (b) TRANSITION RULE.—Notwithstanding the 

9 amendment made by subsection (a), a Federal reserve 

10 bank shall have the power to sell any bills, notes, revenue 

11 bonds, or warrants described in the language struck by 

12 such amendment, if such bills, notes, revenue bonds, or 

13 warrants are held by the Federal reserve bank on the date 

14 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
### Part F—Job Opportunities and Basic Skills Training Program
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 11-3639

___________

David Anthony Stebbins, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Missouri.

Reliable Heat & Air, LLC; *

Randal Richardson, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: July 20, 2012

Filed: July 24, 2012

___________

Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

David Stebbins appeals the district court’s adverse grant ofsummary judgment

1

on his disability-discrimination claim and related hostile-work-environment claim,

and the district court’s denial of his “motion to confirm arbitration award.” Upon

careful de novo review, see Tusing v. Des Moines Indep. Cmty. Sch. Dist., 639 F.3d

507, 514 (8th Cir. 2011), we conclude that the grant of summary judgment was

proper, for the reasons stated by the district court. We also conclude that the district

The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge for the Western 1

District of Missouri.
court properly denied Stebbins’s “motion to confirm arbitration award,” as that

motion was meritless.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
### Part G—Off-Highway Motor Vehicles

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This part was, in the original, designated part I and has been changed to part G for purposes of codification.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The California Coast Provincial Advisory Committee (PAC) will meet on December 9, 2004, in Eureka, California. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss issues relating to implementing the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP).

# DATES:

The meeting will be held from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

      ( print page 67300)    

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Six Rivers National Forest Supervisor's Office, 1330 Bayshore Way, Eureka.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Phebe Brown, Committee Coordinator, USDA, Mendocino National Forest, 825 N. Humboldt Avenue, Willows, CA 95988, (503) 934-1137; E-MAIL                         *pybrown@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda items to be covered include: (1) Regional Exosystem Office (REO) update; (2) Provincial Interagency Executive Committee (PIEC) feedback to the PAC regarding their recommendations on watershed analyses and Healthy Forest Restoration Act projects; (3) Report on the Province 2004 Implementation Monitoring activity held in September; (4) Continue panel discussion concerning options for silvicultural treatments on federal lands; (5) Presentation on the NWFP 10-year monitoring program; (6) Presentation on Bureau of Land Management/Department of Fish and Game research on impacts of fall, winter and spring prescribed burning on avian and terrestrial species; and (7) Public comment. The meeting is open to the public. Public input opportunity will be provided and individuals will have the opportunity to address the Committee at that time.

Dated: November 9, 2004.

Phebe Y. Brown,

Committee Staff Coordinator.

[FR Doc. 04-25482  Filed 11-16-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 29, 2010

p0125 

# Order

January 29, 2010

139998

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139998 COA: 293232 Livingston CC: 08-017562-FH JEFFREY SCOTT SPANN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e October 21, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# December 2011 Report on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of The Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206.

Accession Number: ML120120145

Date Released: Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML120120146 - December 2011 Report on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206. (3 page(s), 1/30/2012)
    - ML120120148 - Enclosure: December 2011 Report on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of The Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206. (18 page(s), 1/30/2012)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
### SUBCHAPTER VII—RURAL CRIME
##### 



Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the annual report of Argo-Tech
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
year ended October 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), each of the undersigned officers of the
Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to such officers knowledge:



| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements
    of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                                                                                               
|
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
    periods expressed in the Report.



| |     |                        
| | --- | -----------------------
| | By: | /s/ MICHAEL S. LIPSCOMB

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| |                        
| | Michael S. Lipscomb    
| | Chief Executive Officer



| |     |                         
| | --- | ------------------------
| | By: | /s/ FRANCES S. ST. CLAIR

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| |                        
| | Frances S. St. Clair   
| | Chief Financial Officer

Date: January 27, 2005
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000

Commission File Number: 333-85443-04

ABN AMRO Mortgage Corporation issuer in respect of
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2000-2
(Exact Name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware      			363886007
(State or Other Juris-		(I.R.S. Employer
diction of Incorporation)     Identification No.)

181 West Madison Street, Chicago, IL 60602
(Address of Principal Executive Office)

248-643-2530
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:     None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:     None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed  by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  X   No _

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K.

Not applicable.

Aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of
the Registrant as of December 31, 2000.

Not applicable.

Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31,
2000.

Not applicable.
§ 1025.55 Final decision on appeal or review. ( a ) *Consideration of record.* Upon appeal from or review of an Initial Decision, the Commission shall consider the record as a whole or such parts of the record as are cited or as may be necessary to resolve the issues presented and, in addition, shall, to the extent necessary or desirable, exercise all the powers which it could have exercised if it had made the Initial Decision.
( b ) *Rendering of final decision.* In rendering its decision, the Commission shall adopt, modify, or set aside the findings, conclusions, and order contained in the Initial Decision, and shall include in its Final Decision a statement of the reasons for its action and any concurring or dissenting opinions. The Commission shall issue an order reflecting its Final Decision.
( c ) Except as otherwise ordered by the Commission, the Commission shall endeavor to file its Decision within ninety (90) days after the filing of all briefs or after receipt of transcript of the oral argument, whichever is later.
### Part B—HOPE for Homeownership of Single Family Homes