alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. II-10-077 November 4, 2010 

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416 

NRC ASSIGNS NEW RESIDENT INSPECTORS TO 

BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials have selected Phillip Niebaum and Lundy 

Pressley as new resident inspectors at the Browns Ferry nuclear power plant near Athens, Ala., 

about 30 miles west of Huntsville. Niebaum and Pressley join Senior Resident Inspector Thierry 

Ross, Resident Inspector Charles Stancil and Site Secretary Charlotte White. 

 Phillip Niebaum joined the NRC in August 2006 as a project 

engineer in the Resident Inspector Development Program in the Region 

II office in Atlanta. He later served as a resident inspector at Southern 

Nuclear’s Hatch nuclear power plant near Baxley, in south Georgia. 

Before joining the agency, he was a reactor operator in the U.S. 

Navy, a system engineer at Siemens Westinghouse Power Corp. and was 

in the Shift Test Engineer qualification program at Norfolk Naval 

Shipyard. Niebaum received a Bachelor of Science degree, specializing in mechanical 

engineering, from the University of Central Florida in May 2000. 

Lundy Pressley joined the NRC in 2008 as a project engineer in 

the Resident Inspector Development Program in the Region II office. 

Before joining the agency, Pressley was attached to the 

Department of the Navy as a Qualified Shift Refueling Engineer based 

out of the Norfolk Naval Shipyard. As a civilian engineer for the Navy, 

he refueled Ohio class ballistic missile submarines and defueled and 

deactivated Los Angeles class submarines as well as serving as the lead 

reactor vessel head maintenance engineer for Improved Los Angeles class 

subs and Nimitz class aircraft carriers in the Atlantic fleet. Pressley received a Bachelor of 

Science degree in Engineering from North Carolina State University in Raleigh. 

“Both Phil Niebaum and Lundy Pressley have the experience and safety commitment to 

carry out the NRC’s mission of protecting people and the environment and to help ensure the 

safe operation of the Browns Ferry plant,” said NRC Region II Administrator Luis Reyes. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

245 Peachtree Center Ave. NE, Suite 1200 

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant site has at least two NRC resident inspectors. 

They serve as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting regular inspections, 

monitoring significant work projects, and interacting with plant workers and the public. Resident 

inspectors can be assigned to any one site for up to seven years. 

The Browns Ferry plant resident inspectors can be reached by calling 256-729-6196. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
### Part A—Research and Investigations
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ryan Anjorie, Appellant.

[820 NYS2d 814]

Application by the *965appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated December 16, 2002 *(People v Anjorie,*300 AD2d 500 [2002]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered March 30, 2000.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz, 2*NY3d 277 [2004]). Crane, J.P., Santucci, Rivera and Skelos, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


<PAGE>

Exhibit 32


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Xpention  Genetics,  Inc.  (formerly
Bayview Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended November
30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  the  undersigned,  in the capacities and on the dates indicated
below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information  contained  in the  Report fairly presents, in  all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  January 18, 2007


/s/ David Kittrell
---------------------------------------
David Kittrell, CEO and CFO
§ 1204.16 Production testing. ( a ) *General.* Manufacturers and importers shall test antennas subject to the standard periodically as they are manufactured, to demonstrate that the antennas meet the requirements of the standard.
( b ) *Types and frequency of testing.* Manufacturers and importers shall determine the types of tests for production testing. Each production test shall be conducted at a production interval short enough to provide a high degree of assurance that, if the samples selected for testing pass the production tests, all other antennas produced during the interval will meet the standard.
( c ) *Test failure* — ( 1 ) *Sale of antennas.* If any test yields results which do not indicate that all antennas manufactured during the production interval will meet the standard, production must cease and the faulty manufacturing process or design must be corrected. In addition, products manufactured before the appropriate corrective action is taken may not be distributed in commerce unless they meet the standard. It may be necessary to modify the antennas or perform additional tests to ensure that only complying antennas are distributed in commerce. Antennas which are subject to the standard but do not comply with the requirements of the standard cannot be offered for sale, distributed in commerce, or imported in the United States.
( 2 ) *Corrective actions.* When any production test fails to provide a high degree of assurance that all antennas comply with the standard, corrective action must be taken. Corrective action may include changes in the manufacturing and/or assembly process, equipment adjustment, repair or replacement, or other action deemed appropriate by the manufacturer or importer to achieve passing production test results.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marco Community Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,
2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Stephen A. McLaughlin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the Report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |     |  |                                               
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------
|Date: November 1, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Stephen A. McLaughlin                     
|                       |  |     |  | Stephen A. McLaughlin, Chief Executive Officer
### subpart 5—national center for complementary and integrative health

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 113–235, div. G, title II, §224(1), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2490, substituted "national center for complementary and integrative health" for "national center for complementary and alternative medicine" in subpart heading.
§ 1027.10 Statute of limitations. ( a ) If a debt has been outstanding for more than 10 years after CPSC's right to collect the debt first accrued, the agency may not collect by salary offset unless facts material to the Government's right to collect were not known and could not reasonably have been known by the official or officials who were charged with the responsibility for discovery and collection of such debts.
( b ) [Reserved]
### §11361a. Preventing involuntary family separation

#### (a) In general

After the expiration of the 2-year period that begins upon May 20, 2009, and except as provided in subsection (b), any project sponsor receiving funds under this subchapter to provide emergency shelter, transitional housing, or permanent housing to families with children under age 18 shall not deny admission to any family based on the age of any child under age 18.

#### (b) Exception

Notwithstanding the requirement under subsection (a), project sponsors of transitional housing receiving funds under this subchapter may target transitional housing resources to families with children of a specific age only if the project sponsor—

(1) operates a transitional housing program that has a primary purpose of implementing an evidence-based practice that requires that housing units be targeted to families with children in a specific age group; and

(2) provides such assurances, as the Secretary shall require, that an equivalent appropriate alternative living arrangement for the whole family or household unit has been secured.

(Pub. L. 100–77, title IV, §404, as added Pub. L. 111–22, div. B, title I, §1103, May 20, 2009, 123 Stat. 1677.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1103 of Pub. L. 111–22, which directed amendment of subtitle A of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act by adding this section after section 403 (as so redesignated by section 1101(2) of Pub. L. 111–22), was executed by adding this section following section 403 (42 U.S.C. 11361) of subtitle A of title IV of Pub. L. 100–77 (this part), to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the earlier of 18 months after May 20, 2009, or 3 months after publication of certain final regulations by Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, see section 1503 of Pub. L. 111–22, set out as an Effective Date of 2009 Amendment note under section 11302 of this title.
### Part B—Block Grants Regarding Mental Health and Substance Use

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 117–328, div. FF, title I, §1241(a)(1), Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5677, substituted "Substance Use" for "Substance Abuse" in part heading.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 24, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. (“ERCOT”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc., Austin, TX. The nature and scope of ERCOT's standards development activities are: ERCOT manages a major portion of the state's electric power grid. ERCOT is responsible for managing the reliable supply of electricity to all customers within its region by maintaining a balance between forecasted schedules of electricity providers and the actual electricity demand among all market participants. ERCOT's members include utilities (municipals, cooperatives and investor owned utilities), power marketers, generation providers, retail service providers and end-use customer representatives.

ERCOT members and market participants meet on a regular basis at ERCOT facilities to create, revise and discuss the standards, policies and procedures in place for the ERCOT region and markets. Because participants are adopting changes to existing standards on a regular basis, ERCOT's standards development activities must be considered on-going.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-25872  Filed 11-19-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Exhibit 31.2

Rule 13A-14(a)/ 15D-14(a) Certification
Of Chief Financial Officer

I, Raffaele M. Branca,
certify that:

1.          I
have reviewed this Report on Form 10-Q of VSB Bancorp, Inc.;

2.          Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.          Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.          The
small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the
small business issuer and have:

a. Designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to
be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

b. [Omitted in accordance
with SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]; and

c. Evaluated the
effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

d. Disclosed in this report
any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the small business issuers fourth fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.          The
small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small
business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a. All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 12, 2008

| |                       
| | ----------------------
| | /s/ Raffaele M. Branca
| |                       
| | Raffaele M. Branca    
| | President, CEO and CFO

27

---
AAM-12-062-E November 16, 2011

Exemption No. 10390 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-1221

Mr. J. B. Marshall Morristown Flying Services, Inc. 2349 Valley Home Road Talbott, TN, 37877

Dear Mr. Marshall:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated October28, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Morristown Flying Services, Inc. (MFS) for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow MFS to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program while operating under separate parts of the regulation.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to MFS.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.2

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Morristown Flying Services, Inc. an exemption from 14 CFR part 120 to the extent necessary to allow MFS to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program while operating under separate parts of the regulation, subject to

the conditions and limitations described below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of MFS are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol program must be implemented under the same auspices of the MFS part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on November 30, 2013 unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/
James R. Fraser, M.D. Deputy Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
No: 14-054 August 25, 2014

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

 

NRC Approves Power Uprate For Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved a request by Exelon Generation Co. to 

increase the generating capacity of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3, by 12.4 percent

each.

The NRC staff determined Exelon could safely increase the reactors’ output primarily by 

upgrading certain plant systems and components. NRC staff also reviewed Exelon’s evaluations 

showing the plant’s design can handle the increased power level.

The NRC’s safety evaluation of the plant’s proposed power uprate focused on several areas, 

such as the nuclear steam supply systems, instrumentation and control systems, electrical systems, 

accident evaluations, radiological consequences, operations and training, testing, and technical 

specification changes. For added confidence in the analysis, the NRC staff also conducted independent 

confirmatory calculations and audits of selected areas.

The power uprate authorizes Peach Bottom, located approximately 18 miles south of Lancaster, 

Pa., to increase each boiling water reactor’s generating capacity by approximately 140 megawatts 

electric. Exelon plans to implement Unit 2’s uprate during the fall 2014 refueling outage and Unit 3’s 

uprate during the fall 2015 refueling outage.

The NRC published a notice about the power uprate application in the Federal Register on April 

9, 2013. The agency’s evaluation of the Peach Bottom uprate will be available through the NRC’s

ADAMS electronic document database by entering Accession Number ML14133A046.
RUSSIAN FIGS SPECIAL REPORT

----

**November 1997**
*In recent years, several new financial-industrial groups, or FIGs, have emerged in Russia.In basic form, these special holding companies fall into two categories: bank-led andindustry-led. FIGs are a force to be reckoned with in some important industries, but many FIGssuffer from serious shortcomings. This State Department report discusses these influentialorganizations.*
The strength of FIGs lies in their combination of both industrial and financial organizations, astrength they have recently utilized to take a very active role in privatization of key areas of theRussian economy.  Most notable is Oneximbank's involvement in the acquisition of a stake in thetelecommunications company Svyazinvest.  Despite their strength, FIGs alone are not able tofulfill Russia's need for capital and are not likely to generate broad economic growth. Industry-ledFIGs, holding companies which include several industrial enterprises and usually at least onefinancial organization, have their own power which is gained from, among other things,accumulated resources. Nevertheless, many industry-led FIGs suffer from the same financial andmanagement shortcomings of typical Russian enterprises --lack of capital and managerial talenthave shown many FIGs to be uneven at organizing and reaping profit.
**Bank-Led FIGs**