alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-11-0328

SAT Date: 4/26/2011

Print Date: 8/3/2012

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 2

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 11

Exposure Based Review:

Health: Yes Exposure based testing (health): May Fit HPV Category

Ecotox: Yes

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

P2Rec Comments:

Comment: No Comment

Keywords:

 Keywords: 

SOLV IRR-E,S,L,GI

SOLV NEURO

SENS-S,L

IMMUNO

MUTA

UNCERT ONCO

AQUATOX-A,C

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:
Fate Summary: P-11-0328

FATE: Estimations for typical MW 92 

Liquid with MP = -94.9 C (M for typical)

log Kow = 2.73 (M for typical) 

S = 526 mg/L at 25 C (M for typical)

VP = 28.4 torr at 25 C (M for typical)

BP = 21-538 C (M for mixture), 111 °C (M for typical)

H = 6.64E-3 (E)

log Koc = 2.37 (E)

log Fish BCF = 1.47 (E)

log Fish BAF = 1.58 (E) 

POTW removal (%) = 25-75 via sorption, stripping and biodeg

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = low - strong

Volatilization half-life from a standard river = 1 hrs

Volatilization half-life from a standard lake = 4 da

Atmospheric Oxidation Half-life = 25 hr via OH radical

PBT Potential: P1B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = slow - rapid

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption of some (unspecified) PMN constituents is 

good all routes, based on physical/chemical properties. There are concerns for solvent irritation 

and solvent neurotoxicity. There is also concern for dermal and respiratory sensitization, based 

on and information in the PMN MSDS. There are also concerns for immunotoxicity 

based on and mutagenicity based on 

 There is also uncertain concern for oncogenicity based on .

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 24

daphnid 48-h LC50 15

green algal 96-h EC50 8.7

fish _ chronic value 2.6

daphnid _ chronic 

value

1.8

algal _ chronic 

value

3.6

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for neutral organic chemicals; 
SAR chemical class = hydrocarbon; MW 92; log Kow = 2.54 (EPI), 2.73 (M, ); liquid 

with unknown mp (P); S = 530 mg/L at 25 C (P); pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% 

active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and 

TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

180

SARs neutral organic chemicals

SAR Class hydrocarbon new chemicals category: neutral 

organics

Ecotox Category 

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: J. Kwiat
#### Donald F. Smith, Appellant, v. Eleanor D. Smith, Respondent.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered on the 16th day of February, 1948, in the Madison County Clerk’s office, dismissing the complaint herein. The action was brought for annulment of marriage. The complaint alleged that the plaintiff was induced to marry the defendant through false and fraudulent representations previous to said marriage. The court found that the defendant falsely represented that she had never been previously married; that the plaintiff believed said statements and representations to be true; that plaintiff after said marriage discovered said representation to be wholly untrue and that defendant had been previously married to one George Mieklus, having been married to said Mieklus on June 3, 1944. The defendant offered no proof and did not contest the action. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs. The court hereby disapproves of and annuls conclusions of law numbered 1 and 2 made by the trial court. The court makes the following conclusions of law: That the plaintiff is entitled to an interlocutory decree annulling his marriage to the defendant on the ground of fraud and the Clerk of the County of Madison is hereby directed to enter the usual interlocutory decree of annulment on this determination. Heffernan, Foster, Bussell and Deyo, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J,5 dissents.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Hector A. Zayas and Others, Respondents.

Judgments and orders affirmed on the authority of *People*v. *Arnstein*(211 N. Y. 585). Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.; Ingraham, P. J., and Laughlin, J., dissented.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  Certification
                                       of
                               Service 1st Bancorp
  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 regarding Quarterly
           Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004


         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Service 1st Bancorp, a California corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify that:

         1.   The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
              ended March 31, 2004 (the "Form 10-QSB") fully complies with the
              requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
              Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2.   Information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.



Dated:   May 12, 2004                        /s/ JOHN O. BROOKS
                                             --------------------------------
                                             John O. Brooks
                                             Chief Executive Officer



Dated:   May 12, 2004                        /s/ ROBERT E. BLOCH
                                             --------------------------------
                                             Robert E. Bloch
                                             Executive Vice President and
                                             Chief Financial Officer

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Service 1st Bancorp and will be retained by Service 1st Bancorp
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

                                                                   Page 25 of 25
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods indicated.
  Dated: May 8, 2007
    /s/ Raouf Y. HalimRaouf Y. HalimChief Executive Officer
§ 904.302 Notice of permit sanction (NOPS). ( a ) Service of a NOPS against a permit issued to a foreign fishing vessel will be made on the agent authorized to receive and respond to any legal process for vessels of that country.
( b ) The NOPS will set forth the permit sanction to be imposed, the bases for the permit sanction, and any opportunity for a hearing. It will state the effective date of the permit sanction, which will ordinarily not be earlier than 30 days after the date of receipt of the NOPS (see § 904.322).
( c ) Upon demand by an authorized enforcement officer, a permit holder must surrender a permit against which a permit sanction has taken effect. The effectiveness of the permit sanction, however, does not depend on surrender of the permit.
[71 FR 12448, Mar. 10, 2006, as amended at 87 FR 38941, June 30, 2022]
§ 1000.1 The Commission. ( a ) The Consumer Product Safety Commission is an independent regulatory agency formed on May 14, 1973, under the provisions of the Consumer Product Safety Act (Pub. L. 92-573, 86 Stat. 1207, as amended (15 U.S.C. 2051, *et seq.*)). The purposes of the Commission under the CPSA are: ( 1 ) To protect the public against unreasonable risks of injury associated with consumer products;
( 2 ) To assist consumers in evaluating the comparative safety of consumer products;
( 3 ) To develop uniform safety standards for consumer products and to minimize conflicting State and local regulations; and
( 4 ) To promote research and investigation into the causes and prevention of product-related deaths, illnesses, and injuries.
( b ) The Commission is authorized to consist of five members appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, for terms of seven years. However, the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993, Public Law 102-389, limited funding to that for three Commissioners for fiscal year 1993 and thereafter.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 27, 2015

No. 04-15-00231-CV

IN RE Dean DAVENPORT; Dillon Water Resources, Ltd.; 5D Drilling and Pump Service, Inc. 

f/k/a Davenport Drilling & Pump Service, Inc.; 5D Water Resources, LLC f/k/a Davenport 

Oper., LLC; Water Exploration Co., Ltd.; WAD, Inc.; Water Investment Leasing Company, 

LLC; Blue Gold Resources Management, LLC; Blue Gold Properties, LLC; and Blue Gold 

Development, LLC

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On May 22, 2015, real parties in interest Tom Hall, Law Offices of Thomas C. Hall, P.C., 

and Blake Dietzmann, filed an unopposed motion for extension of time to file a response to the 

petition for writ of mandamus. The motion is GRANTED. A response on behalf of the real 

parties in interest is due in this court no later than June 18, 2015.

It is so ORDERED on May 27, 2015.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2012-CI-03086, styled Tom Hall, Thomas C. Hall, P.C. as Successor in 

Interest to Hall & Bates, L.L.P., Blake Dietzmann, Tim Patton and Timothy Patton, P.C. v. Dillon Water Resources, 

Ltd., 5D Drilling and Pump Service, Inc. f/k/a Davenport Drilling & Pump Service, Inc., 5D Water Resources, LLC 

f/k/a Davenport Oper., LLC, Dean Davenport, WAD, Inc., Water Exploration Co., Ltd., Water Investment Leasing 

Company, LLC, Blue Gold Resources Management, LLC, Blue Gold Properties, LLC and Blue Gold Development, 

LLC, pending in the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Peter A. Sakai presiding.
#### Kenneth E. Newell, as Administrator with the Will Annexed of Carolyn M. Newell, Deceased, Respondent, v. Juliet R. Jasper, Appellant; Juliet Absolon et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. [See *post,*p. 937.]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**DALE METZGER,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 457 WAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 15th day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allo wance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**

**Justice Eakin did not participate in the decision of this m atter.**
### §§11281, 11282. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 11281, Pub. L. 99–660, title IX, §951, Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3813, which provided for establishment of Clearinghouse on Alzheimer's Disease, was renumbered section 445E of the Public Health Service Act by Pub. L. 100–607, title I, §142(a), Nov. 4, 1988, 102 Stat. 3057, and is classified to section 285e–7 of this title.

Section 11282, Pub. L. 99–660, title IX, §952, Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3813, which provided for dissemination project to be conducted by national organization representing individuals with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias, was renumbered section 445F of the Public Health Service Act by Pub. L. 100–607, title I, §142(a), Nov. 4, 1988, 102 Stat. 3057, and is classified to section 285e–8 of this title.
Exhibit 32


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


<PAGE>

Exhibit 32


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Xpention  Genetics,  Inc.  (formerly
Bayview Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended November
30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  the  undersigned,  in the capacities and on the dates indicated
below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information  contained  in the  Report fairly presents, in  all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  January 18, 2008


/s/ David Kittrell
---------------------------------------
David Kittrell, CEO and CFO
No: 15-017 March 20, 2015

CONTACT: Dave McIntyre, 301-415-8200 

NRC Issues Final Environmental Report on Sequoyah Nuclear Plant License Renewal

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has published its final report detailing the environmental 

impacts of renewing the operating licenses of the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2. The 

supplemental environmental impact statement contains the NRC staff’s conclusion that the impacts 

would not preclude renewing the plant’s licenses for an additional 20 years.

The Sequoyah plant has two pressurized water reactors, located in Soddy-Daisy, Tenn. about 16 

miles northeast of Chattanooga. The reactors are currently licensed to operate through Sept. 17, 2020, 

for Unit 1 and Sept. 15, 2021, for Unit 2. The operator, Tennessee Valley Authority, submitted its 

renewal application Jan. 15, 2013. 

The NRC’s review of the application consists of a technical safety review and an environmental 

review. The final supplemental environmental impact statement is Supplement 53 to NUREG-1437, 

Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants. It is now available on 

the NRC’s website.

The NRC published a draft version of the report last August and held two public meetings in 

Soddy-Daisy in September to receive public comment. The final report includes the staff’s responses to 

the comments.

The Sequoyah Nuclear Plant license renewal application and general information about reactor 

license renewal are available on the NRC website.
### **CHAPTER 45—FAIR HOUSING**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERALLY

Sec.
3601.
Declaration of policy.
3602.
Definitions.
3603.
Effective dates of certain prohibitions.
3604.
Discrimination in the sale or rental of housing and other prohibited practices.
3605.
Discrimination in residential real estate-related transactions.
3606.
Discrimination in the provision of brokerage services.
3607.
Religious organization or private club exemption.
3608.
Administration.
3608a.
Collection of certain data.
3609.
Education and conciliation; conferences and consultations; reports.
3610.
Administrative enforcement; preliminary matters.
3611.
Subpoenas; giving of evidence.
3612.
Enforcement by Secretary.
3613.
Enforcement by private persons.
3614.
Enforcement by Attorney General.
3614–1.
Incentives for self-testing and self-correction.
3614a.
Rules to implement subchapter.
3615.
Effect on State laws.
3616.
Cooperation with State and local agencies administering fair housing laws; utilization of services and personnel; reimbursement; written agreements; publication in Federal Register.
3616a.
Fair housing initiatives program.
3617.
Interference, coercion, or intimidation.
3618.
Authorization of appropriations.
3619.
Separability.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—PREVENTION OF INTIMIDATION

3631.
Violations; penalties.
In the

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-23-00078-CV

IN THE MATTER OF JENNIFER NICOLE HINES AND

SAMANTHA LUE HAWTHORN-NORTON AND

IN THE INTEREST OF C.C.H. AND D.M.-H., MINOR CHILDREN

On Appeal from the County Court at Law

Lamar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 91997

Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice van Cleef
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Samantha Lue Hawthorn-Norton, appellant, filed a notice of appeal in this matter on 

October 9, 2023. Appellant has not filed a docketing statement in accordance with Rule 32.1 of 

the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 32.1. Further, appellant has not 

tendered the mandatory $205.00 filing fee associated with the appeal, see TEX. R. APP. P. 5, and 

has not filed proof of indigency in lieu of a filing fee, see TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1. 

“A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs must pay—at the 

time an item is presented for filing—whatever fees are required by statute or Supreme Court 

order. The appellate court may enforce this rule by any order that is just.” TEX. R. APP. P. 5. 

By letter dated November 3, 2023, appellant was provided with notice of and an 

opportunity to cure these defects. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). The clerk’s letter further 

warned appellant that, if she did not submit an adequate response to the notice by November 13, 

2023, this appeal would be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution and for failure to comply 

with the above-cited rules. Appellant did not file a docketing statement, did not pay the 

mandatory filing fee, and did not file proof of indigency in lieu of a filing fee. Further, we 

received no communication from appellant responsive to the November 3 correspondence.

Accordingly, this appeal is ripe for dismissal. 
3

Pursuant to Rule 42.3, subsections (b) and (c), of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, 

we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

Charles van Cleef

Justice

Date Submitted: November 29, 2023

Date Decided: November 30, 2023
**UNPUBLISHED**

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15** 

**- 1382** 

CATANDRIA N. SOUBLET ,
Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE ,
Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States Tax Court. ( No. 27242

- 14)

Submitted : August 27 , 2015 Decided: August 31, 2015

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Catandria N. Soublet, Appellant Pro Se. Patricia McDonald Bowman, Trial Attorney, Bridget Maria Rowan, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Catandria N. Soublet a ppeals from the tax court ’ s order

dismissing for lack of jurisd iction her unsigned and unratified

petition for redetermination of a deficiency with respect to her

2012 income tax liability. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in

forma pauperis and affirm f or the reasons stated by the tax

court. See Soublet v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue , T.C. No.

27242

- 14 (U.S.T.C. Apr. 6, 2015). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this cou rt and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRM E D
#### Venice Marina, Inc., Respondent, v. John Sjogren, Tenant, and Plum Island Fishing Station, Inc., Appellant.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Appellate Division, to dispense with printing record on appeal and for other relief denied, with $10 costs. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, MaeCrate, Schmidt and Beldoek, JJ.
### **CHAPTER 3—LEPROSY**
<PAGE>



                                                                   Page 17 of 17





                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(f)


Key Bank USA, National Association               Bankers Trust Company
127 Public Square                                as Indenture Trustee
Cleveland, Ohio  44114-1306                      4 Albany Street, 7th Floor
                                                 New York, New York  10015

Bank One, National Association
  as Eligible Lender Trustee
One First National Plaza Suite 0126
Chicago, Illinois  60670

                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT
                      FOR KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 1999-A

We have examined management's assertion, included in its representation letter
dated March 19, 2002 that Key Bank USA, National Association (KBUSA), a wholly
owned subsidiary of KeyCorp, complied with sections 4.04, 4.08(a), 4.08(b),
4.08(c), 5.05, 5.06, 5.07 and 5.08 of the KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 1999-A Sale
and Servicing Agreement and sections 1.(a)(xx), 1.(b)(iii), 2 and 3 of the
KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 1999-A Administration Agreement (collectively, the
"Agreements") as of December 31, 2001 and for the year then ended. Management is
responsible for KBUSA's compliance with those requirements. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on management's assertion about KBUSA's compliance
based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about KBUSA's
compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances, except that in accordance with
Section 5.05 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement, our examination assumed the
accuracy of reports prepared by KBUSA's student loan processor. We believe that
our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination
does not provide a legal determination on KBUSA's compliance with the specified
requirements.

In our opinion, assuming the accuracy of reports prepared by KBUSA's student
loan processor, management's assertion that KBUSA complied with the
aforementioned requirements as of December 31, 2001 and for the year then ended
is fairly stated, in all material respects.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of KBUSA, Bankers
Trust Company, and Bank One, National Association and is not intended to be and
should not be used by anyone other than for these specified parties.



                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


March 19, 2002
#### Joseph A. Firsching, Jr., et al., Respondents, v. Central New York Power Corporation, Appellant.

Memorandum: The examination permitted is too broad in scope and is not limited as to the period of time concerning which the plaintiff is authorized to make inquiry of the defendant’s officers, agents and employees. The record does not contain sufficient facts to permit the court to modify the order. If a new application is made the supporting affidavit should state the date, or approximate date when the defendant replaced the regulator, meter, and attachments, and the order should limit the examination from the date when such replacements were made to the time when the explosion occurred. It should further be limited to permit the plaintiffs to inquire into only those matters alleged in paragraph “Seventh” of the complaint. All concur. (The order grants plaintiffs’ motion for an examination of defendant as an adverse party before trial and denies defendant’s cross motion for judgment on the pleadings.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ.