alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of APW Ltd. (n/k/a BQX Ltd.) (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 2) for the year ended August 31, 2001
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Richard D. Carroll Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/
---------------------------
Richard D. Carroll
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
November 6, 2002
EXHIBIT 32

STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Kwajo M. Sarfoh, is the Chief Executive
 Officer and Princiapal Financial Officer of Cape Coastal Trading Corporation (the Company).

This statement is being furnished in connection with
 the filing by the Company of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June
 30, 2004 (the Report).

By execution of this statement, I certify that:

|a. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
 Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and
|-- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|b. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
 in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the
 dates and for the periods covered by the Report.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | /S/ Kwajo M. SarfohKwajo M. Sarfoh, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial OfficerDate: August 24, 2004
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 223 (Friday, November 19, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 67697]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25723]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 223 / Friday, November 19, 2004 / 
Notices

[[Page 67697]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Eastern Arizona Counties Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Eastern Arizona Counties Resource Advisory Committee will 
meet in Snowflake, Arizona. The purpose of the meeting is to review and 
approve projects for funding.

DATES: The meeting will be held December 3, 2004, at 12:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Silver Creek Campus of 
Northland Pioneer College, Symposium Room (LC101), located on Highway 
77, Snowflake, Arizona. Send written comments to Robert Dyson, Eastern 
Arizona Counties Resource Advisory Committee, c/o Forest Service, USDA, 
P.O. Box 640, Springerville, Arizona 85938 or electronically to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#89fbedf0fae6e7c9effaa7efeceda7fcfa"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8af8eef3f9e5e4caecf9a4ecefeea4fff9">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Dyson, Public Affairs Officer, 
Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests, (928) 333-4301.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Committee 
discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. 
However, persons who wish to bring Pub. L. 106-393 related matters to 
the attention of the Committee may file written statements with the 
Committee staff three weeks before the meeting. Opportunity for public 
input will be provided.

    Dated: November 1, 2004.
Elaine J. Zieroth,
Forest Supervisor, Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests.
[FR Doc. 04-25723 Filed 11-18-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
| **Fair Value (Narrative) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions** | Mar. 31, 2020 | Dec. 31, 2019 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|---------------|
| **Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]**                        |          |          |
| Other invested assets overseas deposit                       | $ 58          | $ 60          |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Overseas deposits are excluded from the fair value hierarchy because their fair value is recorded using the net asset value per share (or equivalent) practical experiment, which can be redeemed at net asset value in 90 days or less.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**cna_OtherInvestedAssetsOverseasDeposit**Namespace Prefix:**cna_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**debit**Period Type:**instant |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_FairValueDisclosuresAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# Quarterly April- June 2014 Report on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206.

Accession Number: ML14182A061

Date Released: Wednesday, July 16, 2014

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML14181B288 - Quarterly April- June 2014 Report on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206 (Memo). (3 page(s), 7/11/2014)
    - ML14181B293 - Quarterly April- June 2014 Report on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206 (Enclosure). (22 page(s), 7/11/2014)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### Alison M. Lederer, Appellant, v. Field and Fancy Publishing Company, Respondent.

Motion denied upon condition that appellant print asan addendum that part of the judgment roll which was omitted from the printed papers on appeal, and be ready for argument on Thursday, April 15, 1915; otherwise, motion granted, with ten dollars costs. (Code Civ. Proc. § 1353; *Muller*v. *City of Philadelphia,*144 App. Div. 593.) Present —Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Max Rumack et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Persons Similarly Situated, Appellants, against Joseph A. McNamara et al., Constituting the Municipal Civil Service Commission of the City of New York, Respondents, and Edward M. Capalbo, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated, Intervener, Respondent.

Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 805.]
#### Babetta Wachsman and Another, Respondents, v. Travelers’ Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Clarke, P. J., Scott, Dowling, Smith and Page, JJ.
History: 

Conrad, 

RE: Meeting with Ferroalloys Industry on 5/1/2012 --follow up 

Amy M. Lincoln to: Conrad Chin, John Rego, Jeff.McKinney, .05/31/2012 05:27PM Rlunn, JKonrady 

Chuck French, Jonathan Averback, "Beth Friedman", Peter Westlin, 

Cc: Robin Segall, Steffan Johnson, "Brad Nelson", Kelly Rimer, Darcie 

Smith 

This message has been replied to and forwarded. 

Thanks for your email. Felman is on schedule to perform stack testing in June. We are in the process of 

finalizing a stack test protocol with our vendor and should have that complete by next week. We would 

appreciate the review of your in-house experts in advance of the testing, and will get you a copy of the 

complete protocol as soon as we have it. 

Amy 

Amy M. Lincoln 

Principal 

Beveridge & Diamond, P.C. 

456 Montgomery Street Suite 1800 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

T (415) 262-4029- F (415) 262-4040 

Alincoln@bdlaw.com 

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: This electronic message contains information from the law firm 

of Beveridge & Diamond, P.C. and may be confidential or privileged. The information is intended 

solely for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) named above. If you are not the intended 

recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message 

is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by telephone at 

(202) 789-6000 or by e-mail reply and delete this message. Thank you. 

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. 

From: Conrad Chin [mailto:Chin.Conrad@epamail.epa.gov] 

-- sent-;---'Fhursday;--May-24,----20~ 2-6;-4-=J AM 

To: John Rego; Jeff.McKinney@erametgroup.com; Amy M. Lincoln; Rlunn@fpiwv.com; 

J Konrady@fpiwv .com 

Cc: Chuck French; Jonathan Averback; Beth Friedman; Conrad Chin; Peter Westlin; Robin Segall; Steffan 

Johnson; Brad Nelson; Kelly Rimer; Darcie Smith 

Subject: Re: Meeting with Ferroalloys Industry on 5/1/2012 --follow up 

Good morningDuring our meeting on 5/1, I heard that both Felman and Era met are planning to perform the compliance 

tests in June. Both plants plan to test for HAPs that will be regulated for the first time (HCI, formaldehyde, 

PAHs, mercury, etc.). 

I would think that you might want to provide a copy of your test plan for us to review soon. We have our 

in-house test experts ready and willing to review your test plans. 
For your reference, I am attaching a copy of the ICR Enclosure that we sent out in April 2010, which 

provided the suggested test methods at that time. 

(See attached file: Draft_Ferroalloys_ICR_Enclosure_2_04051 O.pdf) 

Conrad K. Chin 

Mail Code 0243-02 

Metals and Minerals Group 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

91.9-541-1512 (voice) 

919-541-3207 (fax)
### subpart 2—prescription drug plans; pdp sponsors; financing
### §10603d. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 10603d was editorially reclassified as section 20107 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
No: II-14-039 July 22, 2014

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416

NRC Names New Resident Inspector for Vogtle Nuclear Plant Construction 

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Atlanta have selected Sarah Temple as a Resident 

Inspector for the construction of Vogtle Units 3 and 4, located near Waynesboro, Ga., about 26 miles 

southeast of Augusta. The two new units are licensed to Southern 

Nuclear Operating Co., which operates the two existing Vogtle nuclear 

units at the same site. 

Sarah Temple is a native of Birmingham, Ala., and began her

NRC career in 2010 as a civil engineer in the Division of Construction 

Inspection in the NRC’s Region II Office in Atlanta. 

Temple has also served on a rotational assignment as a Resident 

Inspector for construction at the Watts Bar plant in Tennessee. In 

addition to being a qualified construction inspector, she is also qualified as a vendor inspector. 

Temple received her bachelor of civil engineering from Auburn University in Auburn, Ala., in 

2010. 

 Temple joins Senior Resident Inspector Justin Fuller and Resident Inspectors Coleman Abbott and 

Chad Huffman at the Vogtle nuclear construction site.

 “Sarah Temple has the training and commitment to help ensure that construction is completed 

according to NRC regulations and in a way that protects people and the environment,” said Deputy 

Regional Administrator for Construction Fred Brown.

Each operating U.S. commercial nuclear power plant site has at least two NRC Resident Inspectors.

They serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting regular inspections, monitoring 

significant work projects, and interacting with plant workers and the public. Inspectors can serve for up to 

seven years at any one site. Construction sites have their own NRC Resident Inspectors and the number 

assigned will be dependent on the work being done at each site.

 The Vogtle construction Resident Inspectors can be reached at 706-437-2540.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# B. Bower Ltr With Enclosure.

Accession Number: ML091200456

Date Released: Friday, May 15, 2009

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML091200463 - B. Bower Ltr Re: Request for Additional Information on Phase 1 DP for West Valley Demonstration Project. (4 page(s), 5/15/2009)
    - ML091240051 - Enclosure: Request for Additional Information for West Valley Demonstration Project. (23 page(s), 5/15/2009)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Victoria Industries, Inc. a Nevada
corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), Oleg Batratchenko, Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and





(2)
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and result of operations of the
  Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Victoria Industries, Inc., and will be retained by Victoria Industries, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.





Date:
      March 30, 2009By:
                /s/
      Oleg BatratchenkoOleg
      BatratchenkoChief
      Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-8 No. 333-52516, No. 333-87102, No. 333-81836, No. 333-69284 and No.
333-66258 and Forms S-3 No. 333-87082 and No. 333-83820) as amended, and in the
related Prospectus of Stratos Lightwave, Inc. of our report dated June 13, 2002,
except for Note 15, as to which the date is July 18, 2002, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedules of Stratos Lightwave, Inc.
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended April 30, 2002.


Chicago, Illinois
July 26, 2002
§ 904.321 Reinstatement of permit. ( a ) A permit suspended for a specified period of time will be reinstated automatically at the end of the period.
( b ) A permit suspended until stated requirements are met will be reinstated only by order of NOAA.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John J. Klozko, Appellant.

Nolan, P J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

LAURA KNIGHT,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 12

- 00355

- CR

Appeal from the

346 th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC#20090D02461)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2015.

STEVEN L. HUGHES, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2002 of XO Communications, Inc. (the Company), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Nathaniel A. Davis, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and     
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date: March 21, 2003

| |                                                                                                             
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Nathaniel A. Davis
Nathaniel A. Davis
President and Chief Operating Officer(Principal
Executive Officer)
#### *Joseph O.Lambert, Appellant, v. City of Rochester, Responde*nt.

affirmed, without costs' of this' appeal to either party. All bon All concur. ’(Appeal from a judgment of Monroe Trial Terin dismissing the complaint in' *a*negligence action.) Present &emdash; McCurn, P. J., Kimball, Piper, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ.
#### § 1000.11 Delegation of functions.

Section 27(b)(9) of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2076(b)(9)) authorizes the Commission to delegate any of its functions and powers, other than the power to issue subpoenas, to any officer or employee of the Commission. Delegations are documented in the Commission's Directives System.
### subpart iii—scholarship program and loan repayment program

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 100–177, title II, §202(f), Dec. 1, 1987, 101 Stat. 999, inserted subpart III heading and redesignated former subpart III as IV.
### Part B—Cybersecurity
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

I, Michael D. Durham, as President and Chief Executive Officer of ADA-ES, Inc. (the Company), certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael D. Durham
|Name:                 |  | Michael D. Durham                    
|Title:                |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date:                 |  | August 6, 2008
#### Clifford Berger et al., Appellants, v Tarry Fuel Oil Co., Respondent.

[819 NYS2d 556]

In an action to recover damages resulting from the discharge of petroleum, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Jamieson, J.), entered February 17, 2004, as denied that branch of their motion, pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a), which was to set aside a jury verdict in favor of the defendant and against them as against the weight of the evidence, and (2) a judgment of the same court entered August 5, 2004, which, inter alia, upon the jury verdict, and upon the order entered February 17, 2004, is in favor of the defendant and against them dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law and the facts, the complaint is reinstated, and a new trial is ordered, with costs to abide the event.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action *(see Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment *(see*CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

The issue of the admissibility of expert testimony on a particular issue is addressed primarily to the sound discretion of the trial court *(see Franco v Muro,*224 AD2d 579 [1996]; *Price v New York City Hous. Auth.,*92 NY2d 553 [1998]). In this case, however, where the defendant’s expert was permitted to testify on the ultimate issue as to whether or not the defendant was negligent, and the expert’s testimony did not exceed the scope of common knowledge, the admission of such proof constituted reversible error *(see Nevins v Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co.,*164 AD2d 807 [1990]; *DiLillo v Reitman Blacktop,*299 AD2d 517 [2002]).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are either without merit or need not be reached in light of our determination. Schmidt, J.P., Spolzino, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.