alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10_6.htm


    
      

    

    Exhibit
      10.6

     

     

    Halkey-Roberts
      Corporation

    Incentive
      Compensation Plan

     

     

    This
      plan
      establishes a pool from which certain bonuses, awards, gifts and payments will
      be made and from which management and key employees of Halkey-Roberts
      Corporation (“Halkey-Roberts”) designated by the Board of Directors of
      Halkey-Roberts (the “Board”) may receive incentive compensation based on their
      position and impact on the profitability of Halkey-Roberts.

     

    The
      Pool:

     

    The
      pool
      shall be equal to 15% of the excess of Halkey-Robert’s operating profit, reduced
      by 50% of the amount of Atrion Corporation’s corporate overhead allocated
      to Halkey-Roberts each calendar year (a “Calendar Year”), over that amount
      required for Halkey-Roberts to realize a 15% return on the average of
      total net assets excluding cash but including working capital used in
      the operations of Halkey-Roberts in said Calendar Year.

     

    Distributions:

     

    Funds
      from the pool will cover bonuses paid to all manufacturing and assembly
      employees during the year, and any discretionary bonuses paid to individuals
      not
      designated as key employees, the annual Atrion Corporation corporate expense
      for
      Restricted Stock Units awarded to Halkey-Roberts personnel, and any other
      charges approved by the Board.  Remaining funds, if any, (less such
      amount, if any, as the Board may determine not to award for such Calendar Year)
      shall be distributed as bonuses to key individuals based on the ratio of points
      assigned by the Board to each person compared to the total of such points,
      subject to adjustment by the Board, and in the case of any participant who
      is an
      executive officer of Atrion Corporation, subject to a further review and
      adjustment by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of
      Atrion. Each participant will receive 75% of his or her specified bonus prior
      to
      March 15 following the Calendar Year and 25% by the next succeeding March 15
      provided the participant is then employed by Halkey-Roberts or one of its
      affiliates.
#### § 1051.3 Place of filing.

A petition should be mailed to: Office of the Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Washington, DC 20207. Persons wishing to file a petition in person may do so in the Office of the Secretary, at 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland.

[48 FR 57123, Dec. 28, 1983, as amended at 62 FR 46667, Sept. 4, 1997]
### §6103. Opening of bids

Whenever proposals for supplies have been solicited, the parties responding to the solicitation shall be notified of the time and place of the opening of the bids, and be permitted to be present either in person or by attorney. A record of each bid shall be made at the time and place of the opening of the bids.

(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3803.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6103 | 41:8. | R.S. §3710. |

Section
### §10192. Applicability

The provisions of this subchapter are subject to section 10107 of this title and shall not apply to facilities that are used for the disposal of high-level radioactive waste, low-level radioactive waste, transuranic waste, or spent nuclear fuel resulting from atomic energy defense activities.

(Pub. L. 97–425, title II, §212, Jan. 7, 1983, 96 Stat. 2245.)
#### Catherine Howes v. New York Press Company.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present—Clarke, P. J, McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Smith, JJ.
Exhibit 8.1
 LIST OF SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES OF SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD.
 Jurisdiction of
    
    Percentage OwnershipCompany
    
    Incorporation
    
    As of December 31, 2008SPIL (B.V.I.) Holding Limited
    
    British Virgin Islands
    
    
    100
    %Siliconware Investment Company Ltd.
    
    Republic of China
    
    
    100
    %Siliconware U.S.A. Inc.
    
    United States of America
    
    
    100
    %SPIL (Cayman) Holding Limited
    
    Cayman Islands
    
    
    100
    %Siliconware Technology (Suzhou) Limited
    
    Peoples Republic of China
    
    
    100
    %
JOINT PRESS RELEASE ON COOPERATION REGARDING THE ACCIDENT AT 

TEPCO’S FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

GREGORY JACZKO, CHAIRMAN, U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

GOSHI HOSONO, SPECIAL ADVISER TO THE PRIME MINISTER OF JAPAN

We had very productive talks about our joint interest in nuclear safety, and the support 

being provided to Japan by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission in dealing with the ongoing situation at Tokyo Electric Power Company’s (TEPCO) Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear 

Power Plant. Mr. Hosono expressed his sincere gratitude for the assistance the NRC provided 

following the accident. Chairman Jaczko extended sympathy to the people of Japan in dealing 

with the difficult circumstances. The NRC and the Japanese authorities have a long record of 

extensive cooperation in nuclear safety.

Chairman Jaczko briefed Mr. Hosono on NRC’s ongoing review of U.S. nuclear plants, 

and Mr. Hosono discussed the Government of Japan’s (GoJ) continuing efforts to deal with the 

challenges posed by the damaged Fukushima reactors and the report the GoJ recently submitted 

to the IAEA.

We look forward to further discussions and cooperation as this situation progresses and 

additional dialogue between the two Governments at the IAEA, and emphasize the importance of 

learning the lessons from TEPCO’s Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant accident to further 

the common cause of nuclear safety.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC’s website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-102 June 10, 2011
### §11335. Annual report

The National Board shall transmit to the Congress an annual report covering each year in which it conducts activities with funds made available under this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 100–77, title III, §305, July 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 491.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Termination of Reporting Requirements

For termination, effective May 15, 2000, of provisions of law requiring submittal to Congress of any annual, semiannual, or other regular periodic report listed in House Document No. 103–7 (in which a report required under this section is listed in the 4th item on page 169), see section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, as amended, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance.
#### Ex Parte: In the Matter of CHUNG HONG, Petitioner.

APPLICATION for a writ of Habeas Corpus.

Webster Street, for Petitioner.

September 5, 1890.

Writ denied.
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)   In connection with the amended quarterly Report of Hitor Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Ken Martin, CEO and CAO of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.     /s/ Ken Martin Ken Martin, CEO, CAO Dated:  November 14, 2011
### Part A—Grid Infrastructure Resilience and Reliability
#### The People of the State of New York v. John De Bellis.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 227 (Friday, November 26, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 68983]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26237]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


United States Postal Service Board of Governors; Sunshine Act 
Meeting

DATES AND TIMES: Tuesday, December 7, 2004; 10 a.m. and 3 p.m.

PLACE: Washington, DC., at U.S. Postal Service Headquarters, 475 
L'Enfant Plaza, SW., in the Benjamin Franklin Room.

STATUS: December 7--10 a.m. (Closed); 3 p.m. (Open).

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Tuesday, December 7--10 a.m. (Closed)

    1. Biohazard Detection Systems.
    2. Audit and Finance Committee Report and Review of Year-End 
Financial Statements.
    3. Financial Update.
    4. Rate Case Planning.
    5. Strategic Planning.
    6. Personnel Matters and Compensation Issues.

Tuesday, December 7--3 p.m. (Open)

    1. Minutes of the Previous Meeting, November 4, 2004.
    2. Remarks of the Postmaster General and CEO.
    3. Committee Reports.
    4. Fiscal Year 2004 Audited Financial Statements.
    5. Postal Service Fiscal Year 2004 Annual Report.
    6. Final Fiscal Year 2006 Appropriation Request.
    7. Capital Investments.
    a. Bethpage, New York, Logistics & Distribution Center.
    b. Kearny, New Jersey, Logistics & Distribution Center.
    8. Tentative Agenda for the January 11, 2005, meeting in 
Washington, DC

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William T. Johnstone, Secretary of the 
Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 
20260-1000. Telephone (202) 268-4800.

William T. Johnstone,
Secretary.

Neva R. Watson,
Alternate Certifying Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-26237 Filed 11-22-04; 4:12 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-M
AMENDMENT
      NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

    


    This
      AMENDMENT
      NO 1. TO EMPLOYMENT
      AGREEMENT
      (this
“Amendment”)
      is
      entered into on and effective for all purposes as of August 6, 2007 by and
      between Scott Newman (“Employee”)
      and
      Conversion Services International, Inc. (the “Company”).
      

    


    WHEREAS,
      the
      Company and Employee are parties to that certain Employment Agreement, entered
      into effective as of March 26, 2004 (the “Agreement”);

    


    WHEREAS,
      pursuant to Section 13 of the Agreement, amendments to the Agreement are
      required to be effected pursuant to a writing executed by the Company and
      Employee; and

    


    WHEREAS,
      the
      Company desires, and Employee hereby agrees, to amend the Agreement on the
      terms
      set forth herein.

    


    NOW,
      THEREFORE,
      in
      consideration of Employee’s continued employment with the Company, and for other
      good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which Employee and the Company
      hereby acknowledge, Employee and the Company hereby amend the Agreement as
      follows: 

    


    Section
      3(a) (Salary)is hereby striken in its entirety and shall now state:

    


    “The
      Company shall pay Employee (i) base compensation (the "Salary") for services
      rendered in the amount of Three Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand ($375,000) per
      annum payable on a semi-monthly basis (which base compensation may be increased
      by the Board of Directors of the Company, in its sole discretion), and (ii)
      annual bonus, if any, as may be determined by the Board of Directors of the
      Company, in its sole discretion.”

    


    No
      Further Amendment.
      Except
      as amended hereby, the Company and Employee hereby agree that the Agreement
      shall remain unmodfied and in full force and effect.

    


    


    


    [Signature
      Page Follows]


    
      
        
        

      

      
        1

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    


    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF,
      the
      undersigned have executed this Amendment effective as of the date first forth
      above.

    
      	 	 	 
	 	CONVERSION
              SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
	 
 	 
 	 
 
	 	By:  	/s/ Glenn
              Peipert
	 	
              

              Name: Glenn
                Peipert

              Title:
                Executive Vice President & Chief Operating Officer

            
	 	 
	 	 
	 	/s/ Scott Newman
	 	
              

              Scott
                Newman

            




    
      
         

      

      
        2
#### Supreme lodge Order of Mutual Protection, Complainant. Anna E. Eckhardt, Appellee, v. Pauline Eckhardt and Beulah Eckhardt, Appellants.

Gen. No. 21,348.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Thomas G. Whindes, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the March term, 1915.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed January 3, 1916.

Statement of the Case.

Interpleader by the Supreme Lodge Order of Mutual Protection against Pauline Eckhardt, Beulah Eckhardt and Anna E. Eckhardt, claimants, to a fund admitted to be due by said Lodge Order under a benefit certificate issued to Charles W. Eckhardt. Prom the decree entered on the bill awarding the fund to Anna E. Eckhardt, Pauline Eckhardt and Beulah Eckhardt appeal.

In the original benefit certificate Beulah Eckhardt, then the wife of Charles, was named as the beneficiary. In March, 1913, Beulah brought suit for divorce in the Chancery Court of Shelby county, Tennessee, charging desertion. Defendant was served and appeared by counsel. After hearing, a decree of divorce was entered finding that the court had jurisdiction and that complainant had sustained her charges by evidence, and ordering defendant to pay complainant, $1,000 in full of alimony, which was paid. No appeal was taken and the decree is still in force. Subsequently Charles Eckhardt married Anna Marley, the other claimant herein.

Under the |( laws of the Lodge Order a member had the right at any time to change his beneficiary, and after his marriage to Anna, Charles surrendered .his original certificate, and a new certificate was issued *303in which Anna Eckhardt was named as beneficiary. The fund which is the subject-matter of this litigation arises from the payment of this last certificate.

Abstract of the Decision.

Estoppel, § *71*—when one invoicing jurisdiction estopped, to deny it.*The jurisdiction of a court of a suit for divorce cannot be questioned in a subsequent proceeding by the party at whose request and upon whose testimony as to jurisdiction of facts such court found that it had jurisdiction, especially where such party has received the benefits of the divorce litigation and rights of others have accrued thereunder, it being immaterial whether the adjudication in the divorce litigation was procured through misrepresentation of facts or misrepresentation of the law.

Albert H. Fry, for appellants.

Robert Van Sands, for appellee Anna E. Eckhardt.

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.
## In t he Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 24

- 00011

- CR

EX PARTE LUIS GUSTAVO VENTURA GIL

On Appeal from the County Court Kinney County, Texas Trial Court No. 12027CR

Before Stevens , C.J., van Cleef and Rambin , JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Rambin2 

### ME MORANDUM OPINION This Court previously reversed the trial court’s denial of Appellant’s pretrial writ of habeas corpus and remanded the matter to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing. 1 Ex parte Gil , No. 06

- 23

- 00215

- CR, 2023 WL 8287590 (Tex. App.

— Texarkana Dec. 1, 20 23, pet. filed) (mem. op., not designated for publication). Before the issuance of our mandate, and while the State’s petition for discretionary review was pending before the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the trial court, on January 9, 2024, issued ano ther denial of Appellant’s pretrial writ of habeas corpus, which is the subject of this appeal. Recognizing that the trial court’s action prior to the issuance of our mandate was a
nullit y, T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 25.2(g) (“Once the record has been filed in the ap pellate court, all further proceedings in the trial court

— except as provided otherwise by law or by these rules

— will be suspended until the trial court receives the appellate

- court mandat e.”), the State filed a motion to dismiss this appeal for want of jur isdiction. We requested that appellant file a response to the State’s motion. In that response, appellant conceded that the trial court’s January 9, 2024, order is void and that this ap peal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

1 Originally appealed to the Fourth Court o f Appeals, this case was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equaliz atio n ef fort s
. See T EX
. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN
. § 7 3.001 (Supp.).3

In light of the fo regoing, we vacate the trial court’s denial of Appellant’s pretrial writ of habeas corpus issued on January 9, 2024, grant the State’s motion to dismiss the appeal, and dismiss this appe al.

Jeff Rambin Justice
Date Submitted: March 2 1 , 2024 Date Decided: March 22, 2024
Do Not Publish
**EPR**

**EVANCICPERRAULT ROBERTSON**

CERTIFIEDGENERAL ACCOUNTANTS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We herebyauthorize Prime Holdings and INvestments, Inc. to use our audited financialstatements of the Company as at December 31, 2001 in the Form 10-KSB AnnualReport Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934dated December 31, 2001.

 

 

Yourstruly,

EVANCICPERRAULT ROBERTSON

 

/s/Andrea Agnoloni 

AndreaAgnoloni (Mr.), CGA

Partner

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

102 -1975 Lonsdale Avenue, North Vancouver, B.C V7M 2K3

Telephone(604) 987-8101    Fax (604) 987-1794

Email: eprnv@istar.ca            Website:  epr.ca

OfficesAcross Canada, Affiliations Worldwide
Exhibit 32.1 Certification of Annual
Report  Pursuant
to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned
officer of Worldwide Energy and Manufacturing USA, Inc. (the Company), hereby
certifies that, to the undersigneds knowledge:  (1)
the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and  (2)
the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.  /s/ Jimmy
Wang Name: Jimmy Wang Chief Executive
Officer Date:  April
13, 2009
EXHIBIT 32

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


          The undersigned executive officers of the Registrant hereby certify to
the best of their  knowledge that this  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the
quarter  ended  September  30,  2004  (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
and the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



Date: November 15, 2004             By: /s/ William M. Tandy
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name: William M. Tandy
                                        Title:Chief Executive Officer




Date: November 15, 2004             By: /s/ Michael D. Wortham
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name: Michael D. Wortham
                                        Title:Chief Financial Officer
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

BRIAN BLIGE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-633

[September 8, 2022]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 from the Circuit Court for the 

Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Ernest A. Kollra, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 12-017569CF10A.

Richard L. Rosenbaum of Law Offices of Richard Rosenbaum, Fort 

Lauderdale, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, KUNTZ and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-31264 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus HUGH ROBINSON, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. CR-95-27-B

- - - - - - - - - - February 10, 1998 Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Hugh Robinson appeals his sentence for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. Robinson argues that the district court clearly erred in holding him responsible for 9.961 kilograms of cocaine and in imposing a sentence enhancement for obstruction of justice. Having reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, we AFFIRM. See United States v. Vital , 68 F.3d 114, 120 (5th Cir. 1995); United States v. Pofahl , 990 F.2d 1456, 1481-82 (5th Cir. 1993).
AFFIRMED.
##### 



Exhibit 10.40
   
    Granted To:
    
    Byron F. Marchant(the Employee for Incentive Stock Options, or the Optionee for Non-Qualified Stock Options)Grant Date:
    
    August 9, 2005Granted:
    
    3,704Grant Price:
    
    $0.0000The close of business on the business day immediately preceding:Vesting Schedule:
    
    Board Restricted Stock1,852 on 02/09/20061,852 on 08/09/2006
  o
 o  Signature:
    
    /s/ Byron F. MarchantoByron F. Marchant
 Note: If there are any discrepancies in the name or address shown above,
please make the appropriate corrections on this form.