alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §7623. Obligated service

(a) Each participant in the Tuition Reimbursement Program shall provide service in the full-time clinical practice of such participant's profession as a full-time employee of the Department for the period of obligated service provided in the agreement of such participant entered into under section 7603 of this title.

(b) A participant who on such participant's course completion date is a full-time employee in the Veterans Health Administration shall be considered to have begun serving such participant's period of obligated service on the course completion date.

(c) Except in the case of a participant whose tuition was paid pursuant to section 7622(e) of this title, if a participant in the Tuition Reimbursement Program fails to successfully complete a course, no reimbursement will be provided and no period of obligated service will be incurred.

(d) In the case of a participant whose tuition was paid pursuant to section 7622(e) of this title and who fails to complete the course involved, the period of obligation shall be of the same duration as it would have been if the participant had successfully completed the course and the course completion date shall be considered to be the date on which the participant's failure becomes an established fact.

(e) For the purposes of this section, the term "course completion date" means the date on which a participant in the Tuition Reimbursement Program completes such participant's course of training under the program.

(Added Pub. L. 100–322, title II, §216(b), May 20, 1988, 102 Stat. 526, §4323; amended Pub. L. 100–687, div. B, title XV, §1503(a)(3), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4134; renumbered §7623 and amended Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §402(b)(1), (d)(1), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 238, 239; Pub. L. 102–83, §4(a)(3), (4), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 404; Pub. L. 103–446, title XII, §1201(b)(1), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4682.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 103–446 substituted "Veterans Health Administration" for "Department of Medicine and Surgery".

1991—Pub. L. 102–40, §402(b)(1), renumbered section 4323 of this title as this section.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–83 substituted "Department" for "Veterans' Administration".

Pub. L. 102–40, §402(d)(1), substituted "7603" for "4303".

Subsecs. (c), (d). Pub. L. 102–40, §402(d)(1), substituted "7622(e)" for "4322(e)".

1988—Subsecs. (c), (d). Pub. L. 100–687 substituted "4322(e)" for "4322(f)".
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 25 (Friday, February 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 5864]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2599]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-53,858]


Elo Touchsystems, Inc., a Subsidiary of Tyco Electronics, 
Fremont, CA; Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on December 22, 2003 in response to a 
petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Elo 
TouchSystems, Inc., a subsidiary of Tyco Electronics, Fremont, 
California.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 12th day of January 2004.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-2599 Filed 2-5-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
#### Harry H. Galinger, Respondent, v. Max M. Tannenbaum, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 30th day of Hovember, 1914, on a verdict, and also from orders entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 9th and 12th days of January, 1915, denying motions for a new trial.

Per Curiam:

The court charged that if the jury found for the plaintiff on the issue of false representation, their verdict should be for $7,700, the full amount of plaintiff’s claim. The proof showed that plaintiff had at a foreclosure sale bought in a portion of the material which, as we understand the testimony, was the part concerning which he alleged he had been deceived. If such was the case, defendant was entitled to be credited with the purchase price. What, if any, further credits defendant may have been entitled to arising out of the disposition by plaintiff of other' portions of the material covered by the transaction between the parties, it is impossible on this record for us to determine. In any event the question of damages was for the jury and not for the court. On the new trial the testimony can be made sufficiently clear to permit the determination of any question arising on this point. On the question of false representations the verdict was against the weight of evidence. For this reason the judgment should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
### §§110, 111. Repealed. July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XIII, §1313, 58 Stat. 714

Section 110, acts June 5, 1920, ch. 235, 41 Stat. 875; June 16, 1921, ch. 23, 42 Stat. 38, provided for a schedule of charges for vessels at New York quarantine station. See section 269 of this title.

Section 111, act Feb. 15, 1893, ch. 114, §7, 27 Stat. 452, provided for suspension of immigration. See section 265 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Renumbering and Repeal of Repealing Act

Title XIII, §1313, formerly title VI, §611, of act July 1, 1944, which repealed these sections, was renumbered title VII, §711, by act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 958, §5, 60 Stat. 1049; §713, by act Feb. 28, 1948, ch. 83, §9(b), 62 Stat. 47; title VIII, §813, by act July 30, 1956, ch. 779, §3(b), 70 Stat. 721; title IX, §913, by Pub. L. 88–581, §4(b), Sept. 4, 1964, 78 Stat. 919; title X, §1013, by Pub. L. 89–239, §3(b), Oct. 6, 1965, 79 Stat. 931; title XI, §1113, by Pub. L. 91–572, §6(b), Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1506; title XII, §1213, by Pub. L. 92–294, §3(b), May 16, 1972, 86 Stat. 137; title XIII, §1313, by Pub. L. 93–154, §2(b)(2), Nov. 16, 1973, 87 Stat. 604, and was repealed by Pub. L. 93–222, §7(b), Dec. 29, 1973, 87 Stat. 936.
### Part T—Oral Healthcare Prevention Activities
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)   In connection with
the amended quarterly Report of Hitor Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation
(the Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31June 30, 2009,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Ken
Martin, CEO and CAO of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.   [exhibit3263009002.gif]  _______________________________ Ken Martin, CEO, CAO Dated:  August 19, 2009
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Declaration of Disaster #3652]
 The city and county of Honolulu in the State of Hawaii constitutes a disaster area as a result of heavy rains and flooding that occurred on October 30, 2004 on the island of Oahu. Applications for loans for physical damage as a result of this disaster may be filed until the close of business on January 18, 2005, and for economic injury until the close of business on August 16, 2005, at the address listed below or other locally announced locations: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 4 Office, P.O. Box 419004, Sacramento, CA 95841-9004. The interest rates are: PercentFor Physical Damage:Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
5.875Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.937Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
5.800Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Others (Including Non-Profit Organizations) with Credit Available Elsewhere
4.750For Economic Injury:Businesses and Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 365206 and for economic damage is 9AJ700. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008.) Dated: November 16, 2004. Hector V. Barreto, Administrator


[FR Doc. 04-26014 Filed 11-23-04; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
NRC CREATES WEB PAGE CONTAINING INFORMATION REGARDING 

CONCRETE DEGRADATION ISSUES AT SEABROOK NUCLEAR PLANT

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has established a page on the agency’s website to 

consolidate information on concrete degradation at the Seabrook nuclear power plant. Seabrook 

is a single pressurized-water reactor located in Seabrook, N.H., and operated by NextEra Energy 

Seabrook, LLC.

Among the items on the web page are correspondence to and from the NRC regarding the 

issue, slides from a 2012 public meeting on the topic and graphics illustrating the condition. 

Information on the issue will be added to the page as it becomes available. The page’s address is: 

http://www.nrc.gov/info-finder/reactor/seabrook/concrete-degradation.html .

 

The concrete degradation at Seabrook is caused by alkali silica reaction. This is a 

chemical combining of reactive silica from the concrete aggregate with the alkali from the 

cement paste in the presence of moisture. (Aggregates are inert granular materials, such as sand, 

gravel or crushed stone that, along with water and cement paste, are an essential ingredient in 

concrete.) The result of the reaction is a gel, which can expand and may cause micro-cracks in 

the concrete.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES link on the 

NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's 

website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region I 

2100 Renaissance Blvd., King of Prussia, Pa. 19406-2713

E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov 

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. I-12-049

Contact: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330

 Neil Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

Dec. 10, 2012

Email: opa1.resource@nrc.gov
### §22702. Purposes

The purposes of the corporation are—

(1) to preserve for ourselves and our posterity the great and basic truths and enduring principles upon which this Nation was founded;

(2) to maintain a continuing interest in the welfare and rehabilitation of the disabled veterans of World War II, the Korean conflict, and the Vietnam era and to establish facilities for the assistance of all veterans and to represent them in their claims before the Department of Veterans Affairs and other organizations without charge;

(3) to dedicate ourselves to the service and best interests of the community, State, and Nation to the end that our country shall be and remain forever a whole, strong, and free Nation;

(4) to aid and encourage the abolition of prejudice, ignorance, and disease;

(5) to encourage universal exercise of the voting franchise to the end that there shall be elected and maintained in public office men and women who hold public office as a public trust administered in the best interests of all the people;

(6) to advocate the development and means by which all Americans may become enlightened and informed citizens and thus participate fully in the functions of our democracy;

(7) to encourage and support an international organization of all peace-loving nations to the end that not again shall any nation be permitted to breach their national peace;

(8) to continue to serve the best interests of our Nation in peace as in war;

(9) to develop to the utmost the human, mental, spiritual, and economical resources of our Nation;

(10) to perpetuate and preserve the friendships and comradeship born on the battle front and nurtured in the common experience of service to our Nation during time of war; and

(11) to honor the memory of those men and women who gave their lives that a free America and a free world might live by the creation of living memorials in the form of additional educational, cultural, and recreational facilities.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1306.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 22702 | 36:67b(1), (3)–(10). | July 23, 1947, ch. 298, §3(1), (3)–(10), 61 Stat. 405. |
| | 36:67b(2). | July 23, 1947, ch. 298, §3(2), 61 Stat. 405; Aug. 15, 1977, Pub. L. 95–98, §1(b)(1), 91 Stat. 830; June 13, 1991, Pub. L. 102–54, §13(n)(1), 105 Stat. 278. |

Section
### SUBCHAPTER I—UNIVERSITY-AFFILIATED FACILITIES FOR PERSONS WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES
(October 29, 1953.)

#### George Colon Contracting Corporation, Appellant, v. Joseph J. Morrison et al., Constituting the Watertown Housing Authority, Defendants, and Herman T. Stichman, as Commissioner of Housing of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur. (Appeal from an order granting a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint as to defendants Commissioner of Housing and People of the State of New York in an action for damages for breach of a building contract.) Present — MeCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.
Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofstreetTRACKS® Gold Trust (the‘‘Trust’’) on Form 10-Q for the period endingJune 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, JamesLowe, principal financial officer of World Gold Trust Services, LLC,the sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Trust.

/s/ JamesLowe*                    

JamesLowe** Chief Financial Officer (principal financialofficer)August 8, 2006

|         |                                                                                                                                                     |
|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| *  | Theoriginally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained atthe Sponsor's offices and will be made available for inspectionupon request. |

|          |                                                                                                                                           |
|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| **  | The Registrant is a trust and Mr.Lowe is signing in his capacity as an officer of World Gold TrustServices, LLC, the sponsor of theTrust. |

----
1 The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief J udge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 08-1361

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Northern District of Iowa. * Francisco Javier Rivera-Gutierrez, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: May 13, 2009 Filed: June 9, 2009

___________ Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Francisco Rivera-Gutierrez pleaded guilty to illegally re-entering the United States, after having been removed subseque nt to a 1990 felony c onviction for assault with a dangerous weapon and a 1998 aggr avated felony conviction for a drugtrafficking offense, in violation of 8 U.S. C. § 1326(a), (b)(2). The district court 1 sentenced him to 57 months in prison and 3 years of supervised release. On appeal, his counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under A nders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the sentence is greater than necessary to comply with-2- the purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and thus unreasonable, because the district court gave undue weight to Rivera-Gutierrez’s ear ly criminal history and failed to give sufficient weight to his significant break from his past criminal behavior. We conclude that the sentence, which wa s within the advisory Guidelines range, is not unreasonable. SeeUnited States v. Toothman , 543 F.3d 967, 970 (8th Cir. 2008) (a sentence within the advisory range is accorded presumption of reasonableness on appeal); see also Rita v. United States , 551 U.S. 338, 341 (2007) (allowing appellate presumption of reasonabl eness). The district court expressly considered relevant factors under sec tion 3553(a), including Rivera-Gutierrez’s criminal history, and nothing in the recordsuggests that the c ourt misapplied those factors. After reviewing the reco rd independently under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.

______________________________
Exhibit
3.2





DEAN
      HELLER
            
            Entity
      #Secretary
      of State
            
            E0251052006-8204
      North Carson Street, Suite 1
            
            Document
      Number:Carson
      City, Nevada 89701-4299
            
            20060778378-68(775)
      634-5708Website:
      secretaryofstate.bizDate
      Filed:12/4/2006
      12:00:59 PMIn
      the office ofDean
      HellerSecretary
      of State








Certificate
of Amendment








Certificate of Amendment to
Articles of Incorporation


For Nevada Profit
Corporations





(Pursuant
to NRS 78.385 and 78.390 - After Issuance of Stock)





1. Name
of corporation:





MediQuip
Holdings, Inc.





2. The
articles have been amended as follows (provide article numbers, if
available):





Article
I: The name of the Corporation is Deep Down, Inc.





3. The
vote by which the stockholders holding shares in the corporation entitling them
to exercise at least a majority of the voting power, or such greater proportion
of the voting power as may be required in the case of a vote by classes or
series, or as may be required by the provisions of the articles of incorporation
have voted in favor of the amendment is 90%.





4.
Effective date of filing (optional): 12/14/06





5.
Officer Signature (required): /s/ David Francis
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2405 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2405

 To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit video voyeurism in 
the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 10, 2003

Mr. Oxley (for himself and Mr. Gonzalez) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit video voyeurism in 
the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Video Voyeurism Prevention Act of 
2003''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF VIDEO VOYEURISM.

    (a) In General.--Title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting after chapter 87 the following new chapter:

                         ``CHAPTER 88--PRIVACY

``Sec.
``1801. Video voyeurism.
``Sec. 1801. Video voyeurism
    ``(a) Whoever, in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction 
of the United States, having the intent to capture an improper image of 
an individual, knowingly does so under circumstances violating the 
privacy of that individual, shall be fined under this title or 
imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
    ``(b) In this section--
            ``(1) the term `captures', with respect to an image, means 
        videotapes, photographs, films, or records by any electronic 
        means;
            ``(2) the term `improper image', with respect to an 
        individual, means an image, captured without the consent of 
        that individual, of the naked or undergarment clad genitals, 
        pubic area, buttocks, or female breast of that individual; and
            ``(3) the term `under circumstances violating the privacy 
        of that individual' means under circumstances in which the 
        individual exhibits an expectation that the improper image 
        would not be made, in a situation in which a reasonable person 
        would be justified in that expectation.''.
    (b) Amendment to Part Analysis.--The table of chapters at the 
beginning of part I of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting after the item relating to chapter 87 the following new item:

``88. Privacy...............................................    1801''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 995.10 Correspondence and applications. ( a ) Distributors or value-added distributors desiring certification from NOAA shall provide a written request and application for certification to the Office of Coast Survey, Attention: Distribution Certification, N/CS, 1315 East West Highway, Silver Spring, Maryland 20910. Such a distributor or value-added distributor is hereafter referred to as Applicant. The Office of Coast Survey (OCS) is the approving office for certification under these requirements.
( b ) Applicant shall provide an application for certification that describes how each element in the applicable sections of this part has been met. The application will also contain an acknowledgment, signed by a company principal, of all terms and conditions described in this part.
( c ) Applicant shall use the appropriate template provided in Appendix A to subpart C of this part to prepare their request for certification.
( d ) Applicant shall provide, with its application, a point of contact with mailing address, phone number, and e-mail address. Applicant shall immediately notify NOAA, through the Office of Coast Survey, of any changes to point of contact information. Failure to do so will be considered a violation of this part and may lead to termination of certification.