alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1308.2 Determinations for specified plastics. ( a ) The following plastics do not exceed the phthalates content limits with a high degree of assurance as that term is defined in 16 CFR part 1107: ( 1 ) Polypropylene (PP), with any of the following additives: ( i ) The plasticizers polybutenes, dioctyl sebacate, isooctyl tallate, paraffinic, naphthenic, and mineral plasticizing oils, and polyol;
( ii ) Unrecovered catalysts;
( iii ) Fillers;
( iv ) Primary and secondary antioxidants;
( v ) Neutralizing agents;
( vi ) Antistatic agents;
( vii ) Slip agents;
( viii ) Metal deactivators;
( ix ) Quenchers;
( x ) UV stabilizers;
( xi ) Nucleating agents;
( xii ) Flame retardants;
( xiii ) Blowing or foaming agents;
( xiv ) Antiblocking agents;
( xv ) Lubricants; or
( xvi ) Colorants.
( 2 ) Polyethylene (PE), with any of the following additives: ( i ) The plasticizers glyceryl tribenzoate, polyethylene glycol, sunflower oil, paraffin wax, paraffin oil, mineral oil, glycerin, EPDM rubber, and EVA polymer;
( ii ) Initiators;
( iii ) Promoters;
( iv ) Unrecovered catalysts;
( v ) Fillers;
( vi ) Antistatic agents;
( vii ) Flame retardants;
( viii ) Anti-blocking agents;
( ix ) Slip agents;
( x ) Blowing agents;
( xi ) Cross-linking agents;
( xii ) Antioxidants;
( xiii ) Carbon black; or
( xiv ) Colorants.
( 3 ) General purpose polystyrene (GPPS), medium-impact polystyrene (MIPS), high-impact polystyrene (HIPS), and super high-impact polystyrene (SHIPS) with any of the following additives: ( i ) Unrecovered catalysts;
( ii ) Internal lubricants;
( iii ) Chain transfer/transition agents;
( iv ) Stabilizers;
( v ) Diluents;
( vi ) Colorants;
( vii ) Aluminum chloride, ethyl chloride, hydrochloric acid;
( viii ) Iron oxide, potassium oxide, chromium oxide; or
( ix ) Bifunctional peroxides.
( 4 ) Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), with any of the following additives: ( i ) The plasticizers hydrocarbon processing oil, triphenyl phosphate, resorcinol bis(diphenyl phosphate), oligomeric phosphate, long chain fatty acid esters and aromatic sulfonamide;
( ii ) Stabilizers;
( iii ) Lubricants;
( iv ) Antioxidants;
( v ) Molecular weight regulators;
( vi ) Initiators/unrecovered catalysts,
( vii ) Activators;
( viii ) Emulsifiers; or
( ix ) Colorants.
( b ) Accessible component parts of children's toys and child care articles made with the specified plastics, and specified additives, listed in paragraph (a) of this section are not required to be third party tested pursuant to section 14(a)(2) of the CPSA and 16 CFR part 1107.
( c ) Accessible component parts of children's toys and child care articles made with a plastic or additives not listed in paragraph (a) of this section that are plasticized or may contain phthalates are required to be third party tested pursuant to section 14(a)(2) of the CPSA and 16 CFR part 1107.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Jon E. Kirchner hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       He is thePresident and Chief Executive Officer of Digital Theater Systems, Inc.

 

2.                                       The Form 10-Qreport of Digital Theater Systems, Inc. for the quarterly period endedMarch 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

3.                                       The informationcontained in the Form 10-Q report of Digital Theater Systems, Inc. for thequarterly period ended March 31, 2004 fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Digital TheaterSystems, Inc.

 

Dated:   May 17, 2004

 
|   | By:    | /s/ JON E. KIRCHNER                   |   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Jon E. Kirchner                       |
|   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to DigitalTheater Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Digital Theater Systems, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

 

----
#### Vincent P. Horan, Appellant, v. John F. Trommer, Inc., Respondent, et al., Defendants.

-Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. The date for the examination to proceed shall be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Botein, JJ.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents SECY-13-0132 - U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Staff Recommendation For The Disposition Of Recommendation 1 Of The Near-Term Task Force Report Accession Number: ML13277A413 Date Released: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 Package Contents The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools. ML13277A418 - SECY-13-0132 - U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Staff Recommendation For The Disposition Of Recommendation 1 Of The Near-Term Task Force Report (14 page(s), 12/6/2013)
            ML13277A421 - SECY-13-0132 Enclosure 1 - Detailed Discussion of Recommended Improvement Activities for the Disposition of NTTF Recommendation 1 (71 page(s), 12/6/2013)
            ML13277A422 - SECY-13-0132 Enclosure 2 - NRC Staff Responses to Public Comments on White Paper Dated May 14, 2013 (11 page(s), 12/6/2013)
            ML13277A425 - SECY-13-0132 Enclosure 3 Defense-In-Depth Observations and Detailed History (71 page(s), 12/6/2013)
            ML13277A426 - SECY-13-0132 Enclosure 4 - NRC Staff Outreach on Disposition of NTTF Recommendation 1 (3 page(s), 12/6/2013)
            ML13318A135 - Draft Commission Paper, "NRC Staff Recommendation for the Disposition of Recommendation 1 of the Near-Term Task Force Report" (7 page(s), 11/20/2013)
            ML13329A782 - SECY-13-0132 Enclosure 7 Staff Response to the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (5 page(s), 12/6/2013)


Privacy Policy Site Disclaimer
No. IV-13-001

Contact: Victor Dricks (817) 200-1128

 Lara Uselding (817) 200-1519

 

January 7, 2013 

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

NRC TO DISCUSS PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF INSPECTION

FOR CALLAWAY NUCLEAR PLANT LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION

NRC staff will present preliminary results of an inspection conducted as part of the 

agency’s review of the Callaway nuclear power plant’s license renewal application on Thursday, 

Jan. 17, 2013. Callaway, located near Fulton, Mo., is owned and operated by Union Electric Co.

An open house will be held from 4 to 5:30 p.m. at the Fulton City Hall, 18 East Fourth

St., in Fulton. NRC Region IV staff, from Arlington, Texas, will be available to discuss the 

preliminary results and answer questions from the public.

The NRC team inspected the plant’s aging management programs as they are applied to 

systems, structures and components within the scope of license renewal. The team also assessed 

the processes used to determine what systems, structures and components are required to be 

monitored for aging effects.

Under NRC regulations, the original operating license for a commercial nuclear power 

plant has a term of 40 years. The license can be renewed for up to an additional 20 years if NRC

requirements are met. The current operating license for the Callaway plant expires on

Oct. 18, 2024.

In December of 2011, Union Electric Co. submitted an application to extend the plant’s 

license by 20 years. The inspection of the plant’s aging management programs is one of a 

number of NRC activities involved in evaluating a license renewal application. The NRC still 

must determine whether further inspections are needed as part of its review of the application.

Currently no final licensing decisions for reactors, including license renewal, will be 

made by the Commission until the waste confidence rule is completed. NRC’s waste confidence 

environmental impact statement and rule is expected by September 2014. 

Additional information concerning license renewal and the Callaway application in 

particular can be found at: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal.html.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV

 1600 E. Lamar Blvd.

 Arlington, TX 76011-4511

Telephone: (817) 860-8100

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov
###

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand.

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.
#### § 0.18 Bureau of Economics.

The Bureau aids and advises the Commission concerning the economic aspects of all of its functions, and is responsible for the preparation of various economic reports and surveys. The Bureau provides economic and statistical assistance to the enforcement Bureaus in the investigation and trial of cases.

[41 FR 54483, Dec. 14, 1976. Redesignated at 45 FR 36341, May 29, 1980, and amended at 50 FR 53303, Dec. 31, 1985; 86 FR 38547, July 22, 2021]
#### Dorothy W. Bernstein, Respondent, *v.*Daniel W. Bernstein, Appellant.

Fourth Department,

May 27, 1953.

*Samuel Schwartz*and *Joseph C. Mennella*for appellant.

*Cyril J. Kendall*and *John J. Kiegher*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

By order to show cause, the defendant-appellant sought an order amending the final decree of annulment rendered herein to eliminate therefrom the provision requiring said defendant-appellant to pay the sum of $20 per week for the support and maintenance of the daughter of the parties. Upon *31the argument of the motion, it appeared that the said daughter was temporarily employed at the Eastman Kodak Company with a take-home weekly wage of $40.81.

The affidavits submitted by the plaintiff-respondent wife and the daughter in opposition to the motion, disclosed that the daughter was desirous of obtaining a college education and with that in mind, was working to earn sufficient money to attend college. No cross motion as required by section 117 of the Civil Practice Act is made by plaintiff-respondent to amend the decree by increasing the amount of payments required to be made by the defendant-appellant in an amount sufficient to afford the daughter a college education.

Upon the return of the motion and without taking any evidence on the question of the defendant-appellant’s financial ability to make increased payments for the education of the daughter, and in the absence of a cross motion seeking increased payments for such purpose, the Special Term made an order modifying the decree of annulment by providing (1) that the payments being made by appellant of $20 per week for the support and maintenance of the daughter be suspended while she is employed and if, during her minority, she becomes unemployed, such payments shall be resumed in the amount of $20 a week; and (2) if, during minority, she enters a college or other institution of higher education authorized to confer degrees, such payments shall be made at the rate of $30 per week during the time she is a student in such college.

Shortly following the granting of such an order, the infant plaintiff gave up her position with Eastman Kodak and entered Rochester Institute of Technology.

We believe the Special Term, in the absence of a cross motion seeking increased payments for the daughter’s college education, and without taking any testimony as to the financial ability of both the parents, was without jurisdiction to make the order appealed from. For the reasons stated, the order of the Special Term insofar as appealed from should be reversed on the law and facts, without costs.

All concur. Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Wheeler, JJ.

Order insofar as appealed from reversed on the law and facts, without costs of this appeal to either party.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 128549 & (18) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 128549 COA: 258589 Kalkaska CC: 01-002086-FH JODIE JAMES LOWERY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 7, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to re lief under MCR 6.508(D). The miscellaneous motion is DENIED.

p1024 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2005

Clerk
#### § 1027.12 Interest, penalties, and administrative costs.

Charges may be assessed on a debt for interest, penalties, and administrative costs in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3717 and the Federal Claims Collection Standards, 4 CFR 101.1 *et seq.*
#### Aida De A. Breckenridge, Respondent, v. William Clemente et al., Doing Business as Clemente, Clemente & Sabatini, Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Judgment unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered, solely as to the measure of damages, upon the ground the amount awarded is excessive, unless plaintiff stipulates to reduce the amount for which judgment was directed to be entered in the sum of $40,000, in which event the judgment, as so modified, is affirmed. Settle order on notice. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Bergan, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 228 (Monday, November 29, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 69446]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26267]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

November 19, 2004.
    The Department of the Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
11000, 1750 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before December 29, 
2004 to be assured of consideration.

Departmental Offices/Office of Foreign Assets Control

    OMB Number: 1505-0177.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Procedures for Payments to Persons Who Hold Certain 
Categories of Judgments.
    Description: Submissions will provide the U.S. Government with 
information to be used in determining the eligibility of an applicant 
under Sec. 2002 of Public Law 106-386 (The Victims of Trafficking and 
Violence Protection Act of 2000) and to complete processing of payments 
under Sec. 2002.
    Respondents: Individuals or households.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 20.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 12 hours.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 240 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Lois K. Holland, Departmental Offices, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220, (202) 622-1563.
    OMB Reviewer: Joseph F. Lackey, Jr., Office of Management and 
Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503, (202) 395-7316.

Lois K. Holland,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-26267 Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4811-16-P
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 17, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 67266-67267]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25515]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 04-3442; MB Docket No. 04-169, RM-10760]


Radio Broadcasting Services; El Indio, TX

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Audio Division, at the request of Charles Crawford, allots 
Channel 236A to El Indio, Texas, as the community's first local aural 
transmission service. See 69 FR 29253, May 21, 2004. Channel 236A can 
be allotted to El Indio, in compliance with the Commission's minimum 
distance separation requirements, provided there is a site restriction 
of 1.3 kilometers (0.8 miles) southeast of the community at coordinates 
28-30-22 North Latitude and 100-18-03 West Longitude. A filing window 
for Channel 236A at El Indio, Texas, will not be opened at this time. 
Instead, the issue of opening a filing window for this channel will be 
addressed by the Commission in a subsequent order.

DATES: Effective December 13, 2004.

[[Page 67267]]


ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rolanda F. Smith, Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MB Docket No. 04-169, adopted October 27, 2004, and 
released October 29, 2004. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during regular business hours at 
the FCC's Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 Twelfth Street, 
SW., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The complete text of this 
decision may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating 
contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW., Room 
CY-B402, Washington, DC 20054, telephone 1-800-378-3160 or http://www.BCPIWEB.com. The Commission will send a copy of this Report and 
Order in a report to be sent to Congress and the General Accounting 
Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 
801(a)(1)(A).

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio, Radio broadcasting.

PART 73--RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES

0
1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334 and 336.


Sec.  73.202  [Amended]

0
2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Texas, is 
amended by adding El Indio, Channel 236A.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 04-25515 Filed 11-16-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
### subpart 2—national heart, lung, and blood institute
Exhibit 32.1

                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                           by Chief Executive Officer

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of VSB Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Merton Corn, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Date: August 9, 2005

                                       /s/ MERTON CORN
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Merton Corn,
                                       President and CEO


A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       29
**Exhibit
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of North American Natural Gas, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended April 30, 2005 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jim
      Glavas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of 2002,
      that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of all the
      Company.











/*s/
                Jim Glavas*Jim
                GlavasChief
                Executive OfficerJuly
                6, 2005
### **CHAPTER 50—GENERAL**

Sec.
5001.
Provisions for carrying mail.
5002.
Transportation of mail of adjoining countries through the United States.
5003.
Establishment of post roads.
5004.
Discontinuance of service on post roads.
5005.
Mail transportation.
5006.
Lien on compensation of contractor.
5007.
Free transportation of postal employees.
### Part A—Community Action Agencies and Programs
§ 990.54 Restoration selection—evaluation of alternatives. ( a ) *Evaluation standards.* Once trustees have developed a reasonable range of restoration alternatives under § 990.53 of this part, they must evaluate the proposed alternatives based on, at a minimum: ( 1 ) The cost to carry out the alternative;
( 2 ) The extent to which each alternative is expected to meet the trustees' goals and objectives in returning the injured natural resources and services to baseline and/or compensating for interim losses;
( 3 ) The likelihood of success of each alternative;
( 4 ) The extent to which each alternative will prevent future injury as a result of the incident, and avoid collateral injury as a result of implementing the alternative;
( 5 ) The extent to which each alternative benefits more than one natural resource and/or service; and
( 6 ) The effect of each alternative on public health and safety.
( b ) *Preferred restoration alternatives.* Based on an evaluation of the factors under paragraph (a) of this section, trustees must select a preferred restoration alternative(s). If the trustees conclude that two or more alternatives are equally preferable based on these factors, the trustees must select the most cost-effective alternative.
( c ) *Pilot projects.* Where additional information is needed to identify and evaluate the feasibility and likelihood of success of restoration alternatives, trustees may implement restoration pilot projects. Pilot projects should only be undertaken when, in the judgment of the trustees, these projects are likely to provide the information, described in paragraph (a) of this section, at a reasonable cost and in a reasonable time frame.