alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC TO DISCUSS IMPLEMENTING ORDERS FOR

POST-FUKUSHIMA IMPROVEMENTS MAY 18 IN ROCKVILLE, MD

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with industry representatives May 18 to 

discuss schedules and guidance for the Orders and related request for information the agency 

issued on March 12. The actions stem from recommendations of the NRC’s Japan Near-Term 

Task Force (NTTF), which examined issues raised by the Fukushima nuclear accident in March

2011.

The meeting will be held from 9 a.m. to noon in the Commissioners’ Conference Room

at NRC Headquarters, 11545 Rockville Pike in Rockville, Md. Senior NRC management and 

industry executives will discuss guidance for the three Orders (covering strategies to respond to 

extreme natural events resulting in the loss of power at plants, ensuring reliable hardened 

containment vents, and enhancing spent fuel pool instrumentation), as well as a multifaceted 

request for information.

The public will have the opportunity to ask the NRC staff questions about the process 

during the meeting, which will be webcast. A teleconference will also be available; those 

planning to attend the meeting or call in to the teleconference should contact James Shea at 

301-415-1388 or james.shea@nrc.gov to ensure adequate meeting resources are available.

The NRC continues to evaluate and act on the lessons learned from Fukushima to ensure 

U.S. nuclear power plants implement appropriate safety enhancements. Following direction from 

the agency’s five Commissioners, the NRC’s activities are being led by a steering committee 

comprised of senior NRC management. The agency has also established the Japan LessonsLearned Project Directorate, a group of more than 20 full-time employees focused exclusively on 

implementing NTTF recommendations and related activities.

###

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand.

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 12-053 May 11, 2012
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 228 (Monday, November 29, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 69377]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26252]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commerical property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Arthritis and 
Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Review of 
Research Program Projects, P01's.
    Date: December 16, 2004.
    Time: 10:30 a.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, 6701 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Yan Z. Wang, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal 
and Skin Diseases, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 820, Bethesa, MD 
20892, (301) 594-4957, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b1c6d0dfd6c880f1dcd0d8dd9fdfd8d99fd6dec7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4c3b2d222b357d0c212d252062222524622b233a">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, 
Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 18, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-26252 Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No: 14-019 March 13, 2014

CONTACT: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200 

NRC Seeks Public Comment on Draft Environmental Report for 

Davis-Besse Nuclear Plant License Renewal – Meetings Scheduled for March 25

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission seeks public comment on a draft report assessing the 

environmental impacts of extending the operating license for the Davis-Besse nuclear power plant in 

Oak Harbor, Ohio.

The Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station is a single pressurized water reactor and is licensed to 

operate through April 22, 2017. First Energy Nuclear Operating Co. applied on Aug. 27, 2010, to renew 

the license for an additional 20 years. 

The draft environmental impact statement contains the NRC staff’s preliminary finding that the 

environmental impacts of license renewal would not preclude renewing the license. This finding is 

based on the analysis and findings in the agency’s generic environmental impact statement on license 

renewal, the environmental report submitted by First Energy, consultation with federal, state and local 

agencies, the NRC staff’s own independent review, and the staff’s consideration of public comments.

The NRC staff will hold two public meetings March 25 at the Camp Perry Conference Center, 

1000 Lawrence Road, Building 600, in Port Clinton, Ohio, to present the report’s findings and receive 

comments from the public. The first session will run from 2-4 p.m., and the second from 7-9 p.m. 

Comments may also be submitted over the federal rulemakings website at www.regulations.gov, using 

Docket ID NRC-2010-0298, or mailed to Cindy Bladey, Chief, Rules, Announcements, and Directives 

Branch, Office of Administration, Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-44M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 

Washington, DC 20555-0001. Comments will be accepted through April 21.

The draft environmental impact statement for the Davis-Besse license renewal (NUREG-1437, 

supplement 52), along with information on the staff’s review of the license renewal application, is 

available on the NRC website.
### SUBCHAPTER III—MISCELLANEOUS AND TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS
### §10242. Office of Nuclear Waste Negotiator

#### (a) Establishment

There is established the Office of the Nuclear Waste Negotiator that shall be an independent establishment in the executive branch.

#### (b) Nuclear Waste Negotiator

(1) The Office shall be headed by a Nuclear Waste Negotiator who shall be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. The Negotiator shall hold office at the pleasure of the President, and shall be compensated at the rate provided for level III of the Executive Schedule in section 5314 of title 5.

(2) The Negotiator shall attempt to find a State or Indian tribe willing to host a repository or monitored retrievable storage facility at a technically qualified site on reasonable terms and shall negotiate with any State or Indian tribe which expresses an interest in hosting a repository or monitored retrievable storage facility.

(Pub. L. 97–425, title IV, §402, as added Pub. L. 100–202, §101(d) [title III], Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1329–104, 1329–121; Pub. L. 100–203, title V, §5041, Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–243; amended Pub. L. 100–507, §1, Oct. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 2541.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 100–202 and Pub. L. 100–203 added identical sections.

#### Amendments

1988—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 100–507 amended subsec. (a) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (a) read as follows: "There is established within the Executive Office of the President the Office of the Nuclear Waste Negotiator."
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of --

Advanced System Management 

Solutions JV, LLC 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Under Contract No. N0042 l-l O-C-0043 et al. ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 61457 

Stephen J. McBrady, Esq. 

Skye Mathieson, Esq. 

Charles Baek, Esq. 

Crowell & Moring LLP 

Washington, DC 

Arthur M. Taylor, Esq. 

DCMA Chief Trial Attorney 

Samuel W. Morris, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

Defense Contract Management Agency 

Chantilly, VA 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: July 1, 2019 

Administrative Judge 

Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61457, Appeal of Advanced System 

Management Solutions JV, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
### §131. Acquisition

In division B, the term "acquisition"—

(1) means the process of acquiring, with appropriated amounts, by contract for purchase or lease, property or services (including construction) that support the missions and goals of an executive agency, from the point at which the requirements of the executive agency are established in consultation with the chief acquisition officer of the executive agency; and

(2) includes—

(A) the process of acquiring property or services that are already in existence, or that must be created, developed, demonstrated, and evaluated;

(B) the description of requirements to satisfy agency needs;

(C) solicitation and selection of sources;

(D) award of contracts;

(E) contract performance;

(F) contract financing;

(G) management and measurement of contract performance through final delivery and payment; and

(H) technical and management functions directly related to the process of fulfilling agency requirements by contract.

(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3682.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 131 | 41:403(16). | Pub. L. 93–400, §4(16), as added Pub. L. 108–136, title XIV, §1411, Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1663. |

Section
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-10-0128 - Proposed Rule:  Domestic Licensing of Source Material - Amendments/Integrated Safety Analysis (RIN 3150-AI50)

Accession Number: ML102380272

Date Released: Tuesday, October 19, 2010

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML102380217 - SECY-10-0128 - Proposed Rule:  Domestic Licensing of Source Material - Amendments/ Integrated Safety Analysis (RIN 3150-AI50) (7 page(s), 10/1/2010)
    - ML102380237 - SECY-10-0128 - Enclosure 1 - FRN for Resubmitted Part 40 ISA Proposed Rule (76 page(s), 10/1/2010)
    - ML102380243 - SECY-10-0128 - Enclosure 2 - Regulatory Analysis for Resubmitted Part 40 ISA Proposed Rule (19 page(s), 10/1/2010)
    - ML102380248 - SECY-10-0128 - Enclosure 3 - Environmental Assessment for Resubmitted Part 40 ISA Proposed Rule (9 page(s), 10/1/2010)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
| **Business Segments (Narrative) (Details)** | 12 Months Ended |
|---------------------------------------------|-----------------|
||
| Percentage of written premiums foreign      | 8.80%           | 6.90% | 7.00% |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Percentage of direct written premiums derived outside of the United States
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**cna_PercentageOfWrittenPremiumsForeign**Namespace Prefix:**cna_**Data Type:**num:percentItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40062

T. J. JONES,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

JANIE COCKRELL, DIRECTOR,

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

(4:99-CV-24)

September 25, 2001

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

With the benefit of briefs and oral argument, we are persuaded

that the motion to reconsider our denial of a request to expand the

certificate of appealability should be denied and judgment of the

district court denying habeas relief to T.J. Jones should be

affirmed.2

Jones has urged reversal on two grounds. Jones first contends

that the district court erred in sustaining a challenge for cause

to Genie Robins Williams, a member of the venire. Ms. Williams’s

response to questions by the prosecutor, defense counsel, and the

state tri al judge presented a classic equivocating prospective

juror. We cannot find that the state trial judge abused his

discretion in excusing Ms. Williams. See Wainwright v. Witt , 469

U.S. 412 (1985).

Jones argues that some jurors received extrinsic evidence from

other jurors during the course of their deliberations at the

sentencing phase of trial. The story is that Ms. Robert, a juror,

had expressed concern that if sentenced to death, Jones might not

have sufficient time to reflect upon his situation. While the

length of the times suggested in response is disputed, the longest

time suggested was an estimate by another juror that it could take

20 to 30 years before an execu tion was carried out. We are not

persuaded that this colloquy among jurors durin g deliberations

present s the forbidden taint of extrinsic evidence. It bears

mention that the speculation, even this longest time of the

conflicting versions, was not seriously in error. Regardless, the

concern of Ms. Robert, the juror assertedly improperly influenced,

was that any execution not be swiftly imposed and that assuredly

was not to be. In short, an assurance regarding the likelihood of

that circumstance does no more than reflect the reality of capital3

punishment today. And to our eyes there was nothing impermissibly

foreign introduced in the jurors’ deliberations.

The judgment is affirmed and the motion to reconsider our

denial of further certificate of appealability is denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Tabatha I, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the
period ending June 30, 2004 (the "Report"), I, John Ballard, President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/John Ballard



 John Ballard,

 President and Chief Financial Officer

September 15, 2004
#### Max Hochberg, Appellant, v. William Weisman, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ. [See 274 App. Div. 763.]
March 25, 2015 

The Honorable Fred Upton 

Chairman, Committee on Energy 

 and Commerce 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

Dear Mr. Chairman: 

On behalf of the Commission, I am transmitting the February 2015 monthly status report 

on the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) activities and use of unobligated carryover 

funds appropriated from the Nuclear Waste Fund. This report describes NRC activities in 

February 2015 to address the remand by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia 

Circuit in In re Aiken County, regarding the licensing process for the U.S. Department of 

Energy’s Yucca Mountain license application. 

 Please feel free to contact me or Eugene Dacus, Director of the Office of Congressional 

Affairs, at 301-415-1776 if you have questions or need more information. 

 Sincerely, 

 /RA/ 

 Stephen G. Burns 

Enclosure: 

As stated 

cc: Representative Frank Pallone 

 
Identical letter sent to: 

The Honorable Fred Upton 

Chairman, Committee on Energy 

 and Commerce 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Frank Pallone 

The Honorable John Shimkus 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Environment 

 and the Economy 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Paul Tonko 

The Honorable James Inhofe 

Chairman, Committee on Environment 

 and Public Works 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

cc: Senator Barbara Boxer 

The Honorable Shelley Moore Capito 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Clean Air 

 and Nuclear Safety 

Committee on Environment 

 and Public Works 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

cc: Senator Thomas R. Carper 

The Honorable Ed Whitfield 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Energy 

 and Power 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Bobby L. Rush 

The Honorable Harold Rogers 

Chairman, Committee on Appropriations 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Nita Lowey 

The Honorable Mike Simpson 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Energy 

 and Water Development 

Committee on Appropriations 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Marcy Kaptur 

The Honorable Lamar Alexander 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Energy 

 and Water Development 

Committee on Appropriations 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

cc: Senator Dianne Feinstein
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-40307

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SERGIO ESTRADA-ZAMARRIPA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:15-CR-494-1

Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Sergio EstradaZamarripa has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Estrada-Zamarripa has filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein, as well as Estrada-Zamarripa’s response. We concur with counsel’s 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 20, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-40307 Document: 00513804545 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2016
No. 16-40307

2

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-40307 Document: 00513804545 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2016
#### V. R. (Bill) LOGAN, Movant, v. COMMONWEALTH, Opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

March 26, 1948.

Rodes K. Myers for movant.

A. E. Funk, Attorney General, and Carl D. Perkins and Jo M. Ferguson, Assistant Attorneys General, opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from a judgment of the Edmonson Circuit Court convicting movant of the crime of assault and battery and fixing his punishment at a fine of $400- and imprisonment in the county jail for six months.

Appeal denied; Judgment affirmed.
### §11708. Assignment of personnel

#### (a) In general

The Secretary is authorized to enter into an agreement with any entity under which the Secretary is authorized to assign personnel of the Department of Health and Human Services with expertise identified by such entity to such entity on detail for the purposes of providing comprehensive health promotion and disease prevention services to Native Hawaiians.

#### (b) Applicable Federal personnel provisions

Any assignment of personnel made by the Secretary under any agreement entered into under the authority of subsection (a) shall be treated as an assignment of Federal personnel to a local government that is made in accordance with subchapter VI of chapter 33 of title 5.

(Pub. L. 100–579, §9, Oct. 31, 1988, 102 Stat. 2923; Pub. L. 100–690, title II, §2309, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4229; Pub. L. 102–396, title IX, §9168, Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1948.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

The 1992 amendment is based on section 1 of S. 2681, One Hundred Second Congress, as passed by the Senate on Aug. 7, 1992, and enacted into law by section 9168 of Pub. L. 102–396. Section 9168, which referred to S. 2681, as passed by the Senate on "September 12, 1992", has been treated as referring to S. 2681, as passed by the Senate on Aug. 7, 1992, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

Pub. L. 100–579 and Pub. L. 100–690 enacted substantially identical sections. The text of this section is based on section 9 of Pub. L. 100–579, as subsequently amended.

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–396 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to rule of construction.
### **CHAPTER 42—NARCOTIC ADDICT REHABILITATION**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec.
3401.
Declaration of policy.
3402.
State facilities and personnel for care and treatment; encouragement of adequate provision; benefit of experience of Surgeon General and Attorney General.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—CIVIL COMMITMENT OF PERSONS NOT CHARGED WITH ANY CRIMINAL OFFENSE

3411 to 3426. Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—REHABILITATION AND POSTHOSPITALIZATION CARE PROGRAMS AND ASSISTANCE TO STATES AND LOCALITIES

3441, 3442. Repealed.