67912 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 224 / Monday, November 22, 2004 / Notices 

1China Shipping Container Lines (Hong Kong) 

Co., Ltd. is a wholly owned subsidiary of China 

Shipping Container Lines Co. Ltd. (‘‘CSCL’’). On 

April 1, 2004 the Commission issued an Order in 

Petition No. P4–03, granting CSCL an exemption 

like that now sought by Petitioner—an exemption 

from the first sentence of section 9(c) of the 1984 

Act.

2The Petitioner, to date, has operated only 

outside of the United States’ trades. Petitioner 

advises that it will commence operations in the U.S. 

trades on or about January 1, 2005.

SUMMARY: On September 27, 2004, the 

Enforcement Bureau of the Federal 

Communications Commission 

(Commission) released a Hearing 

Designation Order (HDO) initiating a 

hearing to determine whether Gulf 

Power Company (Gulf Power) is entitled 

to receive compensation above marginal 

cost for any attachments to its utility 

poles belonging to Florida Cable 

Telecommunications Association; 

Comcast Cablevision of Panama City, 

Inc.; Mediacom Southeast, L.L.C.; and 

Cox Communications Gulf Coast, L.L.C 

(collectively, Cable Operators). To avail 

themselves of the opportunity to 

participate in this hearing, the parties 

were required to file a written Notice of 

Appearance with the Office of the 

Commission Secretary, stating an 

intention to appear on the date fixed for 

the hearing and present evidence on the 

issues specified in the HDO, within 20 

days of the mailing of the HDO to the 

parties.

DATES: The HDO was mailed to the 

parties on September 27, 2004. The 

parties were required to file their 

Notices of Appearance by October 18, 

2004.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications 

Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., 

Room TW–204(B), Washington, DC 

20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Rhonda J. Lien, 202–418–7330.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Enforcement Bureau previously ruled 

that Gulf Power violated section 224 of 

the Act, 47 U.S.C. 224, and the 

Commission’s pole attachment rules, 47 

CFR 1.1401–1.1418, by charging the 

Cable Operators rates higher than those 

allowed by the Commission’s rules and 

policies and by refusing to negotiate 

new rates in good faith. See Florida 

Cable Telecommunications Association, 

Inc.; Comcast Cablevision of Panama 

City, Inc.; Mediacom Southeast, L.L.C.; 

and Cox Communications Gulf Coast 

L.L.C. v. Gulf Power Company,

Memorandum Opinion and Order, 18 

FCC Rcd 9599 (Enf. Bur. 2003). Gulf 

Power timely filed a Petition for 

Reconsideration and Request for 

Evidentiary Hearing on June 23, 2003. 

The complete text of this HDO is 

available for inspection and copying 

during normal business hours in the 

FCC Reference Information Center, 

Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room 

CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554. This 

document may also be purchased from 

the Commission’s duplicating 

contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. 

(BCPI), Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., 

Room CY–B402, Washington, DC 20554, 

telephone 202–863–2893, facsimile 

202–863–2898, or via e-mail at http://

www.bcpiweb.com.

Federal Communications Commission. 

Christopher N. Olsen, 

Deputy Chief, Enforcement Bureau.

[FR Doc. 04–25517 Filed 11–19–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

[Petition No. P6–04] 

Petition of China Shipping Container 

Lines (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd., for an 

Exemption From the First Sentence of 

Section 9(c) of the Shipping Act; 

Notice of Filing 

Notice is hereby given that China 

Shipping Container Lines (Hong Kong) 

Co., Ltd. (‘‘Petitioner’’), a controlled 

carrier as that term is defined by the 

Shipping Act of 1984, has petitioned, 

pursuant to section 16 of the Shipping 

Act of 1984, 46 U.S.C. app. 1715, and 

46 CFR 502.69, for an exemption from 

the first sentence of section 9(c) of the 

1984 Act, 46 U.S.C. app. 1708(c).1

Petitioner seeks an exemption so that it 

may reduce its tariff rates upon 

publication.2

In order for the Commission to make 

a thorough evaluation of the Petition, 

interested persons are requested to 

submit views or arguments in reply to 

the Petition no later than December 6, 

2004. Replies shall consist of an original 

and 15 copies, be directed to the 

Secretary, Federal Maritime 

Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, 

NW., Washington, DC 20573–0001, and 

be served on Petitioner’s counsel, Brett 

M. Esber, Esq., Blank Rome LLP, 

Watergate 600 New Hampshire Avenue, 

NW., Washington, DC 20037. It is also 

requested that a copy of the reply be 

submitted in electronic form 

(WordPerfect, Word or ASCII) on 

diskette or e-mailed to 

Secretary@fmc.gov.

Copies of the petition are available at 

the Office of the Secretary of the 

Commission, 800 N. Capitol Street, 

NW., Room 1046. A copy may also be 

obtained by sending a request to 

secretary@fmc.gov or by calling (202) 

523–5725. Parties participating in this 

proceeding may elect to receive service 

of the Commission’s issuances in this 

proceeding through e-mail in lieu of 

service by U.S. mail. A party opting for 

electronic service shall advise the Office 

of the Secretary in writing and provide 

an e-mail address where service can be 

made. Such request may be directed to 

secretary@fmc.gov.

Bryant L. VanBrakle, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 04–25770 Filed 11–19–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6730–01–P

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed Collection; 

Comment Request

AGENCY: Board of Governors of the 

Federal Reserve System

SUMMARY: June 15, 1984, the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) 

delegated to the Board of Governors of 

the Federal Reserve System (Board) its 

approval authority under the Paperwork 

Reduction Act, as per 5 CFR 1320.16, to 

approve of and assign OMB control 

numbers to collection of information 

requests and requirements conducted or 

sponsored by the Board under 

conditions set forth in 5 CFR 1320 

Appendix A.1. Board–approved 

collections of information are 

incorporated into the official OMB 

inventory of currently approved 

collections of information. Copies of the 

OMB 83–Is and supporting statements 

and approved collection of information 

instruments are placed into OMB’s 

public docket files. The Federal Reserve 

may not conduct or sponsor, and the 

respondent is not required to respond 

to, an information collection that has 

been extended, revised, or implemented 

on or after October 1, 1995, unless it 

displays a currently valid OMB control 

number.

Request for comment on information 

collection proposal

The following information collection, 

which is being handled under this 

delegated authority, has received initial 

Board approval and is hereby published 

for comment. At the end of the comment 

period, the proposed information 

collection, along with an analysis of 

comments and recommendations 

received, will be submitted to the Board 

for final approval under OMB delegated 

authority. Comments are invited on the 

following:

a. whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper