alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No: IV-14-010 April 30, 2014

CONTACT: Victor Dricks (817) 200-1128

Lara Uselding (817) 200-1519

NRC to Hold Public Meeting to Discuss

Status of Fort Calhoun Nuclear Station

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with Omaha Public Power District (OPPD) 

officials on May 13 to discuss the status of performance improvement activities at the Fort Calhoun 

nuclear power plant. The plant, operated by OPPD, is located 19 miles north of Omaha, Neb.

The meeting will be held from 6 - 9 p.m. at the Omaha Marriot, 10220 Regency Circle, in 

Omaha, NRC officials will answer questions from the public after the business portion of the meeting.

The plant remains under the NRC’s increased oversight and the discussion will center on the 

status of OPPD’s improvement initiatives in the engineering and operations performance areas, results 

of self-assessment activities, and effectiveness of the corrective action process.

These items are part of the post-restart Confirmatory Action Letter and must be resolved before 

the plant would be allowed to return to the NRC’s reactor oversight process. The plant restarted Dec. 

18, 2013, after a shutdown of 32 months.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Siskiyou County Resource Advisory Committee will meet in Yreka, California, December 13, 2004. The meeting will include routine business, presentations of larger scale project concept papers, and the review and recommendation for implementation of submitted project proposals.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held December 13, 2004, from 4:30 p.m. until 7 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Yreka High School Library, Preece Way, Yreka, California.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Don Hall, RAC Coordinator, Klamath National Forest, (530) 841-4468 or electronically at                         *donaldhall@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public. Public comment opportunity will be provided and individuals will have the opportunity to address the Committee at that time.

Dated: November 19, 2004.

Margaret J. Boland,

Designated Federal Official.

[FR Doc. 04-26180  Filed 11-24-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Questions for EPA on Survey Response to PVC MACT Section 114 Request

(Submitted 10-30-09)

1. Survey Part 2: Several forms ask for itemization of specific HAP and Total VOC concentrations or 

amounts. Is total VOC exclusive of the materials listed as HAPs?

2. Form K-1-a “Percent of time control equipment operated”. This is assumed to mean the percent 

of time the control equipment was in operation relative to its associated stream/equipment and 

not the percent of time the equipment operated relative to a year. Is this correct?

3. Please define what a “feedstock” is (as referred to in Form H) – this is not clear within the survey.

4. What is the significance of having boilers used for steam generation included in Form E 

(Combustion Units other than Thermal Oxidizers, Catalytic Oxidizers and Flares) when they have 

their own MACT standard?

5. What is “intrinsic viscosity” and is this the same as “inherent viscosity” (as referred to in Form B1)?

6. On Form J – why is there reference to form G-1 (Process Control Changes)?

7. Please more clearly define “Maintenance Wastewater”

8. On Form O – Is the intended tank survey for those only vented to the atmosphere? A number of 

vessels are used for intermediate holding and are closed systems.

9. On Form K34 – Is waste water exposed to atmosphere at any point? Waste water is normally 

stripped if it contains a certain amount of VCM. Is the intention to identify what the quality of the 

waste water is when it first becomes exposed to atmosphere and if so, should that be identified?

10. On Form B-1, the industry measures molecular weight using inherent viscosity. The form asks for 

intrinsic viscosity which is a different test and is not practiced in the PVC industry. For purposes 

of clarification, can the EPA clarify the use of inherent viscosity for reporting?

11. On Form B-1, because production runs will be reported by resin grade, can the form be modified 

to allow ranges in inherent viscosity for grade groups?

12. On Form B-1, the cell for reporting production volume needs to be able to allow a number greater 

than 100,000. 

13. Some cells on some forms have restricted access that do not allow a response to be entered. 

Can EPA suggest a workaround so that information can be entered into restricted access cells?
§ 1112.33 What must an audit address or cover and who conducts the audit? ( a ) The reassessment portion of an audit must cover management requirements and technical requirements. Each reassessment portion of an audit also must examine the third party conformity assessment body's management systems to ensure that the third party conformity assessment body is free from any undue influence regarding its technical judgment.
( b ) The third party conformity assessment body must have the reassessment portion of the audit conducted by the same accreditation body that accredited the third party conformity assessment body. For example, if a third party conformity assessment body was accredited by an accreditation body named AB-1, then AB-1 would conduct the reassessment. If, however, the same third party conformity assessment body changes its accreditation so that it becomes accredited by a different accreditation body named AB-2, then AB-2 would conduct the reassessment.
( c ) The third party conformity assessment body must have the examination portion of the audit conducted by the CPSC. The examination portion of the audit will consist of resubmission of the “Consumer Product Conformity Assessment Body Acceptance Registration Form” (CPSC Form 223) by the third party conformity assessment body and the CPSC's examination of the resubmitted CPSC Form 223. ( 1 ) For “firewalled” conformity assessment bodies, the CPSC's examination may include verification to ensure that the “firewalled” conformity assessment body continues to meet the criteria set forth in section 14(f)(2)(D) of the CPSA.
( 2 ) For government-owned or government-controlled conformity assessment bodies, the CPSC's examination may include verification to ensure that the government-owned or government-controlled conformity assessment body continues to meet the criteria set forth in section 14(f)(2)(B) of the CPSA.
No: 14-087 December 10, 2014

CONTACT: Maureen Conley, 301-415-8200 

NRC Remains Among the Best Places to Work in the Federal Government,

Partnership for Public Service Says

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is again among the top places to work in the federal 

government, according to the non-profit Partnership for Public Service, which released its annual 

rankings Dec. 9. The NRC, which has made the top 10 for as long as the rankings have been available, 

this year comes in 6th out of 25 mid-sized agencies. 

The NRC is an independent agency of about 4,000 employees.

The rankings are compiled from an annual survey conducted by the Office of Personnel 

Management. The data this year shows the NRC has sustained its performance in most areas, improved 

in some and declined in others. Areas of improvement included job satisfaction, up 1 percent from last 

year to a 72 percent positive response, and talent management, up 2 percent to a 70 percent positive 

response. 

While the agency’s scores slipped in knowledge management and leadership, the Partnership for 

Public Service ranked NRC supervisors first among 22 mid-sized agencies. The “Effective Leadership: 

Supervisors” subcategory measures employee opinions about their immediate supervisor’s job 

performance, how well supervisors give employees the opportunity to demonstrate leadership skills and 

the extent to which employees feel supervisors support employee development and provide worthwhile 

feedback about job performance.

In each of the major indices used and measured by the survey, the NRC ranked either second, 

third or fourth among all federal agencies. In government-wide measurements, the NRC was second in 

talent management, second in job satisfaction, third in leadership and knowledge management, and 

fourth in the results-oriented performance culture area. The agency’s overall score fell slightly, from 

73.8 in 2013 to 72.9 this year.

“We look forward each year to getting information that will help focus our attention on areas 

where we can improve,” said NRC Chairman Allison Macfarlane. “We want our employees to continue 

to remain fully engaged and to have a high level of job satisfaction. Given the nature of our mission, it 

is imperative that we remain a high-performing organization rooted in a strong culture that values its 

people and their work.”

“We are pleased to see our employees still rate this agency so high,” said Chief Human Capital 

Officer Miriam Cohen. “We certainly have our challenges, especially backfilling behind the talented 
Page | 2

people who retire after long careers here. But given our low attrition rate and the large number of 

applications we receive for each job posting, the evidence is clear—the NRC remains a great place to 

work.”

The annual government-wide survey evaluates the management leadership, employee 

satisfaction and organizational culture of federal agencies. The NRC uses the results of the survey as a 

key source of staff input, and for continually improving and maintaining an effective workforce.

The full rankings are available here.
### §11132. Reporting of sanctions taken by Boards of Medical Examiners

#### (a) In general

#### (1) Actions subject to reporting

Each Board of Medical Examiners—

(A) which revokes or suspends (or otherwise restricts) a physician's license or censures, reprimands, or places on probation a physician, for reasons relating to the physician's professional competence or professional conduct, or

(B) to which a physician's license is surrendered,

shall report, in accordance with section 11134 of this title, the information described in paragraph (2).

#### (2) Information to be reported

The information to be reported under paragraph (1) is—

(A) the name of the physician involved,

(B) a description of the acts or omissions or other reasons (if known) for the revocation, suspension, or surrender of license, and

(C) such other information respecting the circumstances of the action or surrender as the Secretary deems appropriate.

#### (b) Failure to report

If, after notice of noncompliance and providing opportunity to correct noncompliance, the Secretary determines that a Board of Medical Examiners has failed to report information in accordance with subsection (a), the Secretary shall designate another qualified entity for the reporting of information under section 11133 of this title.

(Pub. L. 99–660, title IV, §422, Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3789.)
§ 990.15 Considerations to facilitate restoration. In addition to the procedures provided in subparts D through F of this part, trustees may take other actions to further the goal of expediting restoration of injured natural resources and services, including: ( a ) *Pre-incident planning.* Trustees may engage in pre-incident planning activities. Pre-incident plans may identify natural resource damage assessment teams, establish trustee notification systems, identify support services, identify natural resources and services at risk, identify area and regional response agencies and officials, identify available baseline information, establish data management systems, and identify assessment funding issues and options. Potentially responsible parties, as well as all other members of the public interested in and capable of participating in assessments, should be included in pre-incident planning to the fullest extent practicable.
( b ) *Regional Restoration Plans.* Where practicable, incident-specific restoration plan development is preferred, however, trustees may develop Regional Restoration Plans. These plans may be used to support a claim under § 990.56 of this part. Regional restoration planning may consist of compiling databases that identify, on a regional or watershed basis, or otherwise as appropriate, existing, planned, or proposed restoration projects that may provide appropriate restoration alternatives for consideration in the context of specific incidents.
### §1002. Qualified individuals

Except as otherwise provided in this subchapter, an individual—

(1) who has attained the age of 65 on or before December 14, 1999;

(2) who is a World War II veteran;

(3) who is eligible for a supplemental security income benefit under subchapter XVI for—

(A) the month in which this subchapter is enacted; and

(B) the month in which the individual files an application for benefits under this subchapter;

(4) whose total benefit income is less than 75 percent of the Federal benefit rate under subchapter XVI;

(5) who has filed an application for benefits under this subchapter; and

(6) who is in compliance with all requirements imposed by the Commissioner of Social Security under this subchapter,

shall be a qualified individual for purposes of this subchapter.

(Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title VIII, §802, as added Pub. L. 106–169, title II, §251(a), Dec. 14, 1999, 113 Stat. 1844.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

For prior provisions, see note set out under section 1001 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2415 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2415

                    For the relief of Zdenko Lisak.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 10, 2003

Mr. LaTourette introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                    For the relief of Zdenko Lisak.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF GROUNDS FOR REMOVAL OF, OR DENIAL OF ADMISSION TO, 
              ZDENKO LISAK.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding sections 212(a) and 237(a) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act, Zdenko Lisak may not be removed from 
the United States, or denied admission to the United States, by reason 
of any act of his that is a ground for removal or denial of admission 
and is reflected in the records of the Immigration and Naturalization 
Service of the Department of Justice, or the Visa Office of the 
Department of State, on the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Rescission of Outstanding Order of Removal.--The Attorney 
General shall rescind any outstanding order of removal or deportation, 
or any finding of deportability, that has been entered against Zdenko 
Lisak by reason of any act described in subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1

Rule 13A-14(a)/15D-14(a) Certification
Of Chief Executive Officer

I, Raffaele M. Branca,
certify that:

1.          I
have reviewed this Report on Form 10-Q of VSB Bancorp, Inc.;

2.          Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.          Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.          The
small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the
small business issuer and have:

a. Designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to
be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

b. [Omitted in accordance
with SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]; and

c. Evaluated the
effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

d. Disclosed in this report
any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the small business issuers fourth fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.          The
small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small
business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a. All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 12, 2008

| |                       
| | ----------------------
| | /s/ Raffaele M. Branca
| |                       
| | Raffaele M. Branca    
| | President and CEO     

26

---
§ 1031.12 Membership criteria. ( a ) The Commissioners, their special assistants, and Commission officials and employees holding the positions listed below, may not become members of a voluntary standards group because they either have the responsibility for making final decisions, or advise those who make final decisions, on whether to rely on a voluntary standard, promulgate a consumer product safety standard, or to take other action to prevent or reduce an unreasonable risk of injury associated with a product. ( 1 ) The Commissioners;
( 2 ) The Commissioners' Special Assistants;
( 3 ) The General Counsel and General Counsel Staff;
( 4 ) The Executive Director, the Deputy Executive Director, and Special Assistants to the Executive Director;
( 5 ) The Associate Executive Directors and Office Directors;
( 6 ) The Assistant Executive Director of the Office of Hazard Identification and Reduction, the Deputy Assistant Executive Director of the Office of Hazard Identification and Reduction and any Special Assistants to the Assistant Executive Director of that office.
( b ) All other officials and employees not covered under § 1031.12(a) may participate as voting members or accept leadership positions in voluntary standard development groups, when authorized with the prior approval of the Office of the Executive Director.
( c ) Commission employees or officials who have the approval of the Office of the Executive Director to accept membership in a voluntary standards organization or group pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section shall apprise the General Counsel and the Voluntary Standards Coordinator prior to their acceptance.
( d ) Commission officials or employees who desire to become a member of a voluntary standards body or group in their individual capacity must obtain prior approval of the Commission's Ethics Counselor for an outside activity pursuant to the Commission's Employee Standards of Conduct, 16 CFR part 1030.
[71 FR 38755, July 10, 2006, as amended at 81 FR 5377, Feb. 2, 2016]
Docket No. FAA - 2016 - 5039 Dir ID 2013 - NM - 148 - AD
#### § 1025.48 Official docket.

The official docket in any adjudicatory proceedings shall be maintained in the Office of the Secretary and be available for public inspection during normal business hours of the Commission.