alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HITACHI

GE Hitochi Nucleor Energy

Jerold G. Heod

Senior Vice President

Regulotory Affoirs

3901 Costle HoYne Rood

P.O. Box 780

Wilmington, NC 28402

USA

T 910-819-5692

F 910-341-2797

Jerold.Heod@ge.com

MFN 11-L35

Morch 24,2OI1.

U.S. Nucleor Regulotory Commission

Mr. Lowrence Kokojko, Director of High LevelWoste Repository Sofety

1-1-555 Rockville Pike

Rockville, MD 20852

Deor Mr. Kokojko:

I om writing to express the continuing commitment of Generol Electric-Hitochi (GEH)to developing our

power Reoctor lnnovotive Smoll Modulor (PRISM)/Advonced Recycling Center (ARC)technoloqy. This US

developed technology solves three domestic energy issues not currently oddressed with conventionol

nucleor technology. First, it recycles spent nucleor fuel ond reduces long-lived rodiooctive moteriol.

Second, it supports energy security by vostly increosing the energy thot con be extrocted from our

uronium resources. Third, it provides on option for o more cost-effective method of disposing of

weopons plutonium. These benefits ore in oddition to the low corbon benefits of nucleor electricity

production.

A key octivity to enobling introduction of this technology is the creotion ond opplicotion of supporting

regulotions. Therefore we ore strongly supportive of the recycling rulemoking process. We ore olso in

support of o licensing bosis thot is truly technology neutrol ond does not disodvontoge US developed

technology.

Recycling rulemoking will ollow GEH to prooctively porticipote in the NRC regulotory process. lt will

ollow us to understond the process by which our technology will be reviewed ond contribute our

technicol expertise to o broodly opplicoble opprooch.

We understond thot the NRC hos committed resources to the preliminory rulemoking process ond

reolize this hos been o chollenge given the mony priorities of the commission. We olso reolize thot

there ore other circumstonces thot, ot ony given time, con determine the direction by which resources

ore ollocoted throughout the NRC. But note thot our industry is committed to the recycling process os

evident by the continued investment in.the mony different technologies.

M€N 11'135

GE Hnad bdear E.4y
March 24,2011

Page2

Continued progress ond o definitive dote for o Finol Rule on the licensing of o recycling focility is o

mojor step forword, ond GEH stonds reody to work with you ond your stoff in onswering ony questions

o, ih" rulemoking process unfolds. In porticulor, we welcome the opportunity to better exploin our

recycling method in more detoilto support the necessity of moking o Finol Rule thot is technology

neutrol.

The Nucleor Energy lnstitute (NEl) hos publicly supported o technology neutrol rulemoking on beholf of

the recycling industry. lt is our hope thot the NRC will consider the industry position while developing

this importont rule.

GEH is committed ot the highest levels of our compony to seeing the recycling rulemoking process

through.

Thonk you for your leodership on this importont issue.

Sincerely,

,a z/"-zJerold G. Heod

Senior Vice President

Regulotory Affoirs

MFN 11'135

cE-Hilad Nudoer EreQy
§ 970.206 Statement of ownership. The application must include sufficient information to demonstrate that the applicant is a United States citizen, as required by § 970.103(b)(6), and as defined in § 970.101(t). In particular, the application must include: ( a ) Name, address, and telephone number of the United States citizen responsible for exploration operations to whom notices and orders are to be delivered; and
( b ) A description of the citizen or citizens engaging in such exploration, including: ( 1 ) Whether the citizen is a natural person, partnership, corporation, joint venture, or other form of association;
( 2 ) The state of incorporation or state in which the partnership or other business entity is registered;
( 3 ) The name of registered agent or equivalent representative and places of business;
( 4 ) Certification of essential and nonproprietary provisions in articles of incorporation, charter or articles of association; and
( 5 ) The name of each member of the association, partnership, or joint venture, including information about the participation of each partner and joint venturer and/or ownership of stock.
#### Village of Great Neck Estates, Appellant, v. Robert J. Rose, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

*672In our opinion respondent “ permitted ” the premises in question to be used as a parking space, since he suffered such use, or tacitly consented thereto, by failing to adopt measures effective to prevent it, although such measures were within his power and duty. (Cf. *People*v. *Knapp,*206 N. Y. 373, 384; *People ex rel. Price*v. *Sheffield Farms Co.,*180 App. Div. 615, affd. 225 N. Y. 25, and *People*v. *Harrison,*183 App. Div. 812.) The fact that the judgment did not specifically require respondent to erect a fence or barrier did not constitute a holding that he might fail to adopt such an obvious measure with impunity in the event that other measures should prove ineffective. Respondent was required to take such reasonable measures as would render the decree effective. (See *Mayor of City of New York*v. *New York & Staten Is. Ferry Co.,*64 N. Y. 622, 624.) Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Sneed and MacCrate, JJ., concur; Adel, J., dissents and votes to affirm. [See *post,*p. 792.]
### [§7106. Repealed. Pub. L. 115–55, §2(s)(1), Aug. 23, 2017, 131 Stat. 1112]

Section, added Pub. L. 87–666, §1, Sept. 19, 1962, 76 Stat. 554, §4006; renumbered §7106 and amended Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §402(b)(1), (d)(1), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 238, 239; Pub. L. 102–83, §4(a)(3), (4), (b)(1), (2)(E), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 404, 405, related to application for administrative appeals.

Provisions similar to those comprising this section were contained in subsec. (c)(2) of former section 4005 of this title, prior to the general amendment of sections 4005 to 4007 by Pub. L. 87–666.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable to all claims for which the Secretary of Veterans Affairs provides notice of a decision under section 5104 of this title on or after the later of 540 days after Aug. 23, 2017, or 30 days after the date on which the Secretary submits to Congress a certification of certain capabilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs to carry out the new appeals system established by Pub. L. 115–55 and to address appeals of decisions on legacy claims, with provision for early applicability of the new appeals system to certain claims, see section 2(x) of Pub. L. 115–55, set out as an Effective Date of 2017 Amendment note under section 101 of this title, and bracketed note thereunder.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF
TREASURER

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ariella Kapelner, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that:

(i)       
          The accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended
          March 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)       
          The information in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
          financial condition and results of operations of Tally-Ho Ventures, Inc. (the
          Company).

| | /s/ Ariella Kapelner
Ariella Kapelner
Treasurer
| | -----------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ProUroCareMedical Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Richard C. Carlson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

(1)           the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 
| /s/  Richard C. Carlson |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Richard C. Carlson      |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| August 14, 2007         |

 

----
Exhibit 31.1  Certification Pursuant to pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended  I, Mr. Biao Jin, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of AIDA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company);  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. As the registrant's certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and I have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the  registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  5. As the registrant's certifying officer, I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.   /s/ Biao Jin Biao Jin Chief Executive Officer Date: November 14, 2007
``

| |  |  | CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
| |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I, Nora Coccaro, chief executive officer and chief
 financial officer of Healthbridge, Inc. (Registrant) certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this Annual
 Report on Form 10-KSB (Report) of Registrant;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this
 Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
 to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
 misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the
 financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all
 material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as
 of, and for, the period presented in this Report;

4.     I am responsible for establishing
 and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14)
 for the Registrant and have:

a)     Designed such disclosure
 controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision,
 to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
 is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report
 is being prepared;

b)     Evaluated the effectiveness
 of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about
 the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
 this Report based on such evaluation; and

c)     Disclosed in this Report
 any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants
 most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that
 has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control
 over financial reporting; and

5.     I have disclosed, based
 on my most recent evaluation, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board
 of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)     All significant deficiencies
 and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which
 are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
 report financial information; and

b)     Any fraud, whether or not
 material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants
 internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: April 12, 2004

/s/ Nora Coccaro

Nora Coccaro, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
 Officer
#### § 1500.10 Education.

*Education* means programs that will educate or communicate the benefits of concrete masonry products in safe and environmentally sustainable development, advancements in concrete masonry product technology and development, and other information and programs designed to generate increased demand for commercial, residential, multi-family, and institutional projects using concrete masonry products and to generally enhance the image of concrete masonry products.
Unassociated Document


    Settlement
      and Release Deed

     

    The
      undersigned, Yozma Hofsheet Ltd., hereby fully and finally releases, acquits
      and
      forever discharges e-SIM Ltd., its officers, shareholders, employees, affiliates
      and other related parties from any and all actions, debts, claims,
      counterclaims, demands, liabilities, damages, causes of action, costs, expenses,
      and compensation of every kind and nature whatsoever, past or present, at law
      or
      in equity, whether known or unknown, which the undersigned or any party related
      to the undersigned, had, has, or may have had at any time in the past until
      and
      including the date of this letter, against e-SIM Ltd., including but not limited
      to any claims which relate to any debt of e-SIM Ltd. to the undersigned pursuant
      to the Consulting Agreement, dated August 7, 1997, between e-SIM Ltd. and Yozma
      Hofsheet Ltd. (the “Consulting Agreement”).

     

    We
      hereby
      confirm that the Consulting Agreement is terminated and of no effect.


     

    In
      witness whereof, the undersigned has signed this Settlement and Release Deed
      on
      this 24 day of July 2007

    


     

    Yozma
      Hofsheet, Ltd.

     

    
      
        

      

    

     

    
      
        	By:
----

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002****(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Can/Am Autosales,  Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-QSB for the  quarter ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the “Report”), I, Triantafyllos Groumoutis President of  the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:   

           (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  

           (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

  

/s/ Triantafyllos Groumoutis   Triantafyllos Groumoutis, President

Dated: November 14, 2003

----
No: IV-13-029 September 9, 2013

CONTACT: Lara Uselding, 817-200-1519

 Victor Dricks, 817-200-1128

NRC Names New Resident Inspector at 

Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has selected 

Rayomand Kumana as the new Resident Inspector at the 

Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant located near Glen 

Rose, Texas.

“Rayomand Kumana’s technical and regulatory 

experience will assist the NRC in carrying out its mission

to protect people and the environment by ensuring the safe 

operation of nuclear power plants,” said acting NRC 

Region IV Administrator Steven Reynolds.

In 2009, Kumana joined the NRC’s Region IV 

office in Arlington, Texas, as a project engineer. Prior to joining the NRC, he was a naval science 

instructor at Texas A&M University at Galveston. Kumana has served in the Navy onboard the 

submarine USS Springfield and in Afghanistan as an Afghan National Army trainer. He holds a 

bachelor’s in mathematics from Rice University and a master’s in environmental management from 

the University of Houston at Clear Lake.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant site has at least two NRC Resident Inspectors.

Kumana joins Senior Resident Inspector John Kramer. They serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at 

the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring significant work projects, and interacting with plant 

workers and the public. 

The Comanche Peak resident inspectors can be reached at: 254-897-1500.
(November 9, 1953.)

#### John Halperin et al., Appellants, v. Alvin B. Wolosoff et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Nolan, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 876.]
#### Patricia A. Dowling, Appellant, v Acea Mosey, as Erie County Public Administrator and as Administratrix of the Estate of Charles A. Saletta, Deceased, Respondent.

[821 NYS2d 326]

*1191Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Kevin M. Dillon, J.), entered May 24, 2005 in a personal injury action. The order granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

Memorandum: Plaintiff appeals from an order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury as defined in Insurance Law § 5102 (d). We reverse. In opposition to the motion, plaintiff submitted, inter alia, a December 28, 1999 report of her treating orthopedist that was affirmed under penalty of perjury but contained only a stamped facsimile signature, as well as the notation that it had been “dictated . . . but not read.” Contrary to plaintiffs contention on appeal, that report is not in admissible form *(see*CPLR 2106; *Park Health Ctr. v Country-Wide Ins. Co.,*1 Misc 3d 906[A], 2003 NY Slip Op 51529[U], *3; *Sandymark Realty Corp. v Creswell,*67 Misc 2d 630, 631 [1971]; *Macri v St. Agnes Cemetery,*44 Misc 2d 702, 703-704 [1965]). We nevertheless conclude that defendant waived any objection to the deficient affirmation by failing to raise the issue of its admissibility *(see Akamnonu v Rodriguez,*12 AD3d 187 [2004]; *Shinn v Catanzaro,*1 AD3d 195, 198 [2003]; *Scudera v Mahbubur,*299 AD2d 535 [2002]; *Sam v Town of Rotterdam,*248 AD2d 850, 851 [1998], *lv denied*92 NY2d 804 [1998]; *see also Bax v Allstate Health Care, Inc.,*26 AD3d 861, 863 [2006]). We further conclude that the orthopedist’s report, together with plaintiff’s deposition testimony, raises triable issues of fact whether plaintiff sustained a fracture as well as a medically determined injury that prevented her from performing substantially all of her usual and customary daily activities for at least 90 days during the 180 days immediately following the accident *(see*Insurance Law § 5102 [d]). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Martoche and Green, JJ.
#### § 971.605 Stable Reference Areas. [Reserved]
#### § 27.118 Applications and proposals lacking definite plans for involvement of human subjects.

Certain types of applications for grants, cooperative agreements, or contracts are submitted to Federal departments or agencies with the knowledge that subjects may be involved within the period of support, but definite plans would not normally be set forth in the application or proposal. These include activities such as institutional type grants when selection of specific projects is the institution's responsibility; research training grants in which the activities involving subjects remain to be selected; and projects in which human subjects' involvement will depend upon completion of instruments, prior animal studies, or purification of compounds. Except for research waived under § 27.101(i) or exempted under § 27.104, no human subjects may be involved in any project supported by these awards until the project has been reviewed and approved by the IRB, as provided in this policy, and certification submitted, by the institution, to the Federal department or agency component supporting the research.
[Civil No. 308.]

#### W. A. CLARK, Appellant, v. F. M. MURPHY, Appellee.

APPEAL from the District Court of the Third Judicial District in and for the County of Yavapai; James H. Wright,' Judge.

Herndon & Hawkins, and E. M. Sanford, for Appellant.

Baldwin & Johnston, for Appellee.

October 1, 1892.

(Note by Reporter.—The record shows, “Opinion filed,” but none appears in the records of the office of the clerk of the supreme court.)

Reversed.