alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2533 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2533

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 10701 Abercorn Street in Savannah, Georgia, as the ``J.C. Lewis, Jr. 
                        Post Office Building''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2533

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 10701 Abercorn Street in Savannah, Georgia, as the ``J.C. Lewis, Jr. 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 10701 
Abercorn Street in Savannah, Georgia, shall be known and designated as 
the ``J.C. Lewis, Jr. Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``J.C. Lewis, Jr. Post Office 
Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 23, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

FULL WRITTEN EXPLANATION 

Approval

1. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission voted to close the following meeting: 

Thursday, February 26, 2015 

 2:00 PM Discussion of NRC International Activities (Closed - Ex. 1 and 9) 

 

The Commission voted 4-0 on February 9 and February 10, 2015 to close this 

discussion which is reasonably expected to involve classified information and 

premature disclosure would be likely to significantly frustrate implementation 

of a proposed Commission action. 

 

Attendance

- Commissioners and members of their staffs 

- Representative of Commission Staff Offices 

- The Executive Director for Operations and members of his staff 

- The Director of the Office of International Programs and members of his staff 

- Representatives of other Federal Agencies 

Contact Person for More Information

Glenn Ellmers, Office of the Secretary (301-415-0442) 

 

 /RA/

 Glenn Ellmers 

 Office of the Secretary 

 02/11/2015
### subpart 2—health care quality improvement programs
Docket No: FAA-2016-3704 Dir iD: 2016-NM-005-AD

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? 

Organization Person Contacted Date Response 

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 1/14/16

Regional Airline Association 1/14/16

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association David Oord 1/14/16

Airlines for America Robert Ireland 1/14/16
### §3215. Lending or permitting use of frank unlawful

A person entitled to use a frank may not lend it or permit its use by any committee, organization, or association, or permit its use by any person for the benefit or use of any committee, organization, or association. This section does not apply to any standing, select, special, or joint committee, or subcommittee thereof, or commission, of the Senate, House of Representatives, or Congress, composed of Members of Congress, or to the Democratic caucus or the Republican conference of the House of Representatives or of the Senate.

(Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 754; Pub. L. 93–191, §10, Dec. 18, 1973, 87 Stat. 746.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1973—Pub. L. 93–191 substituted provision for nonapplication of section to "any standing, select, special, or joint committee, or subcommittee thereof, or commission, of the Senate, House of Representatives, or Congress, composed of Members of Congress, or to the Democratic caucus or the Republican conference of the House of Representatives or of the Senate" for such nonapplication to "any committee composed of Members of Congress".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1973 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 93–191 effective Dec. 18, 1973, see section 14 of Pub. L. 93–191, set out as a note under section 3210 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1971, pursuant to Resolution No. 71–9 of the Board of Governors. See section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note preceding section 101 of this title.
#### Dennis Riddell et al., Respondents, v June A. Brown, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

(Appeal No. 5.)

[820 NYS2d 924]

*1213Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Cattaraugus County (Larry M. Himelein, A.J.), entered February 14, 2006 in a personal injury action. The order denied the motion of defendant June A. Brown for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against her.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint against defendant June A. Brown is dismissed.

Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action against June A. Brown (defendant) and other defendants to recover damages for injuries they sustained when they struck an underground gas line, causing an explosion. We conclude that Supreme Court erred in denying the motion of defendant, the prior owner of the gas line, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against her. Generally, liability for an allegedly defective condition on property must be based on “occupancy, ownership, control, or a special use of such premises. The existence of one or more of th[o]se elements is sufficient to give rise to a duty of care” *(Balsam v Delma Eng’g Corp.,*139 AD2d 292, 296 [1988] [citations omitted], *lv dismissed in part and denied in part*73 NY2d 783 [1988]). Defendant established her entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting evidence establishing that, at the time of the accident, none of those elements was present, and plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(see id.*at 297; *see generally Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). Because defendant owed no duty of care to plaintiffs, she cannot be held liable for the allegedly defective condition on the property *(see Bruhns v Antonelli,*255 AD2d 478 [1998]; *Balsam,*139 AD2d at 296-297). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Kehoe, Martoche, Smith and Fine, JJ.
### Part A—Measurement Research
### §§11481 to 11489. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–235, title I, §142(b), Oct. 3, 1996, 110 Stat. 3089

Section 11481, Pub. L. 100–77, title VII, §771, as added Pub. L. 101–645, title VI, §651, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4747, related to definitions for this part.

Section 11482, Pub. L. 100–77, title VII, §772, as added Pub. L. 101–645, title VI, §651, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4749; amended Pub. L. 103–382, title III, §370(a), Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3976, related to general grants for demonstration programs to encourage provision of supportive services to low-income individuals and families.

Section 11483, Pub. L. 100–77, title VII, §773, as added Pub. L. 101–645, title VI, §651, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4752, related to requirement that family support grant recipients were to use not more than 7 percent of such grant to improve the retention and effectiveness of staff and volunteers.

Section 11484, Pub. L. 100–77, title VII, §774, as added Pub. L. 101–645, title VI, §651, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4752; amended Pub. L. 103–382, title III, §370(d), Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3977, related to family case managers.

Section 11485, Pub. L. 100–77, title VII, §775, as added Pub. L. 101–645, title VI, §651, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4752, related to Gateway programs.

Section 11486, Pub. L. 100–77, title VII, §776, as added Pub. L. 101–645, title VI, §651, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4754, related to evaluation of programs and entities that received assistance under this subchapter.

Section 11487, Pub. L. 100–77, title VII, §777, as added Pub. L. 101–645, title VI, §651, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4754; amended Pub. L. 103–382, title III, §370(b), Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3977, related to submission of reports to Congress by the Secretary.

Section 11488, Pub. L. 100–77, title VII, §778, as added Pub. L. 101–645, title VI, §651, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4755, provided that nothing in this part was to be construed to modify Federal selection preferences described in section 1437d of this title or authorized policies and procedures of governmental housing authorities operating under annual assistance contracts pursuant to section 1437 et seq. of this title with respect to admissions, tenant selection and evictions.

Section 11489, Pub. L. 100–77, title VII, §779, as added Pub. L. 101–645, title VI, §651, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4755; amended Pub. L. 103–382, title III, §370(c), Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3977, authorized appropriations to carry out this part.
NRC NAMES NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT HOPE CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia, 

Pa., have selected Christopher Williams as the new Resident Inspector 

at the Hope Creek nuclear plant in Lower Alloways Creek Township, 

N.J. Williams joins Senior Resident Inspector Fred Bower at the plant, 

which is operated by PSEG Nuclear.

Williams joined the agency in 2010 after serving in the Navy’s 

Nuclear Propulsion Program for 14 years, including tours as an 

Engineering Officer and Reactor Safeguards Examining Board member. After completing a 

rigorous NRC inspector qualification program, he has been working as a reactor inspector at 

plants throughout the Northeast carrying out engineering inspections. Williams earned a 

bachelor’s degree in accounting from the University of Florida and a master’s in engineering 

management from Old Dominion University in Virginia. 

“Chris Williams has the training, experience and commitment to safety to carry out the 

NRC mission of protecting people and the environment by helping to ensure the safe operation 

of Hope Creek,” said NRC Region I Administrator Bill Dean.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant site has at least two NRC Resident Inspectors. 

They serve as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting regular inspections, 

monitoring significant work projects, and interacting with plant workers and the public. 

Inspectors can serve for up to seven years at any one site.

The Hope Creek resident inspectors can be reached at 856-935-5373.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES link on the 

NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's 

website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region I 

2100 Renaissance Blvd., King of Prussia, Pa. 19406-2713

E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov 

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. I-12-029

Contact: Diane Screnci (610) 337-5330

 Neil Sheehan (610) 337-5331

July 2, 2012

Email: opa1.resource@nrc.gov
### Part D—Other Federal Energy Conservation Measures

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This part, originally designated part E and subsequently redesignated part F by Pub. L. 95–619, title IV, §441(a), Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3267, was changed to part D for purposes of codification.
#### The City of New York v. Harris Ginsberg. The City of New York v. Harris Ginsberg. The City of New York v. Harris Ginsberg. The City of New York v. Harris Ginsberg.

Motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Smith and Davis, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 228 (Monday, November 29, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 69397]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26214]



[[Page 69397]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Joint Venture Under ATP Award No. 70NAB4H3055

    Notice is hereby given that, on October 20, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the Joint Venture Under ATP 
Award No. 70NAB4H3055 has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
(1) The identities of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and 
objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of invoking the Act;s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties 
to the venture are: The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, MI and Veeco 
Metrology, LLC, Santa Barbara, CA. The nature and objectives of the 
venture are to develop high speed atomic force microscope capabilities 
for quantitative nanomechanical measurements.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-26214 Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
###### Editorial Note on Part 922

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

#### § 922.198 Procedures for determining watercraft and related items which sink on or after the date of Sanctuary designation to be an underwater cultural resource.

The Director, in consultation with the State of Michigan, appropriate federal agencies, and the governing body of any affected federally-recognized tribe, may determine, after providing 45 days for public comment, that any sunken watercraft, including a ship, boat, canoe, skiff, raft, or barge; the rigging, gear, fittings, trappings, and equipment of any sunken watercraft; the personal property of the officers, crew, and passengers of any sunken watercraft; and the cargo of any sunken watercraft, that sinks on or after the date of Sanctuary designation, to be an underwater cultural resource if such is determined by the Director to be 50 years or older and of special national significance due to architectural significance or association with individuals or events that are significant to local or national history.
#### In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner; Catherine A. Lindsey, Respondent.

[820 NYS2d 532]

Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1995, was suspended by this Court’s order dated June 15, 2000 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (273 AD2d 600 [2000]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the grounds that she has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (22 NYCRR) part 118. Petitioner does not object to respondent’s application.

Respondent’s application is granted and she is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Cardona, EJ., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.
Exhibit 21.1
 SUBSIDIARIES
 Name:
    
    
    
    Jurisdiction of Organization1.
    
    
    Endeavour Operating Corporation
    
    Delaware2.
    
    
    Endeavour Energy UK Limited
    
    England and Wales3.
    
    
    Endeavour Energy Netherlands B.V.
    
    The Netherlands4.
    
    
    Endeavour International Holding B.V.
    
    The Netherlands5.
    
    
    Endeavour Energy New Ventures, Inc.
    
    Delaware6.
    
    
    END Management Company
    
    Delaware7.
    
    
    Endeavour North Sea Limited
    
    England and Wales8.
    
    
    Endeavour Energy Luxembourg S.a.r.l.
    
    Luxembourg
§ 231.308 Recovery and other remedies. ( a ) Interest on a debt under § 231.305 or § 231.307 will be calculated from the date on which the Secretary provides a final notification that an action violated § 231.202 or § 231.203.
( b ) The Secretary may take action to collect a debt under § 231.305 or § 231.307 if such debt is not paid within the time prescribed by the Secretary in the required agreement or mitigation agreement. In addition or instead, the matter may be referred to the Department of Justice for appropriate action.
( c ) If the Secretary makes an initial determination that § 231.202 or § 231.203 have been violated, the Secretary may suspend Federal financial assistance.
( d ) The recoveries and remedies available under this section are without prejudice to other available remedies, including remedies articulated in the required agreement or civil or criminal penalties.
Untitled Document




 Exhibit
      10.1

 

RAM
      HOLDINGS LTD.

RAM
      REINSURANCE COMPANY LTD.

DIRECTOR
      COMPENSATION

 

On
    August 3, 2007, the Boards of Directors of RAM Holdings Ltd. and RAM Reinsurance
    Company Ltd., on recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance
    Committee, approved the compensation program described below to compensate
    non-employee directors for service on the Boards of Directors of RAM Holdings
    Ltd., RAM Reinsurance Company Ltd., and their respective committees. The
    compensation program described below replaces the compensation program currently
    in effect.

 

Directors
    who are “independent” as defined under Section 301 of the Sarbanes
    Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules thereunder, and the non-employee Chairman
    of the Board of Directors, will receive the following compensation:

 

	 
	•
	Annual
          cash retainer for Board service of $35,000



	 
	•
	Annual
          cash retainer for Audit Committee service of $5,000



	 
	•
	Annual
          cash retainer for service on the Compensation Committee, Nominating
          and Corporate Governance Committee and Risk Management Committee of
          $4,000 each



	 
	•
	Annual
          cash retainer for service as the Chair of the Audit Committee of $10,000



	 
	•
	Annual
          cash retainer for service as the Chair of the Compensation Committee,
          Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Risk Management Committee
          of $6,000 each



	 
	•
	Annual
          cash retainer for service as the Chair of the Board of Directors of
          $25,000



	 
	•
	Initial
          award of 13,000 options for new directors



	 
	•
	Annual
          award of $40,000 fair value of options or restricted share units for
          all directors



 

The
    above cash retainer amounts are all additive. For example, the Chair of the
    Audit Committee will receive the Board retainer of $35,000, the Audit Committee
    retainer of $5,000 and the Audit Committee Chair retainer of $10,000, for
    a total of $50,000. 

 

The
    cash retainers will be paid on a quarterly basis (1/4 each quarter) and are
    not dependent upon meeting attendance.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Russell C. Horowitz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Marchex, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Marchex, Inc.



|                   |  |        |  |                           
|------------------ |  | ------ |  | --------------------------
|Date: May 10, 2011 |  | By:    |  | /S/    RUSSELL C.
HOROWITZ
|                   |  | Name:  |  | Russell C. Horowitz       
|                   |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: March 16, 2009
    
    /s/ Gregory W. FreibergGregory W. Freiberg
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)