alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 904.252 Witnesses. ( a ) *Fees.* Witnesses, other than employees of a Federal agency, summoned in an administrative proceeding, including discovery, are eligible to receive the same fees and mileage as witnesses in the courts of the United States.
( b ) *Witness counsel.* Any witness not a party may have personal counsel to advise him or her as to his or her rights, but such counsel may not otherwise participate in the hearing.
( c ) *Witness exclusion.* Witnesses who are not parties may be excluded from the hearing room prior to the taking of their testimony. An authorized officer is considered a party for the purposes of this subsection.
( d ) *Oath or affirmation.* Witnesses shall testify under oath or affirmation requiring the witness to declare that the witness will testify truthfully.
( e ) *Failure or refusal to testify.* If a witness fails or refuses to testify, the failure or refusal to answer any question found by the Judge to be proper may be grounds for striking all or part of the testimony given by the witness, or any other action deemed appropriate by the Judge.
( f ) *Testimony in a foreign language.* If a witness is expected to testify in a language other than the English language, the party sponsoring the witness must indicate that in its Initial Disclosures so that an interpreter can be arranged for the hearing. When available, the interpreter should be court certified under 28 U.S.C. 1827.
[71 FR 12448, Mar. 10, 2006, as amended at 87 FR 38939, June 30, 2022]
**COURT OF APPEALS**

**TENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS**

****

October 29, 2015

No. 10-15-00367-CR

JEREMIAH TENNON

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

From the 278th District Court

Walker County, Texas

Trial Court No. 26,799

**JUDGMENT**

	This appeal has been considered by the Court.  Because the Court finds that it does not have jurisdiction of the appeal, it is the judgment of this Court that the appeal is dismissed.  

A copy of this judgment will be certified by the Clerk of this Court and delivered to the trial court clerk for enforcement.

PER CURIAM

SHARRI ROESSLER, CLERK

By: ___________________________

							Nita Whitener, Deputy Clerk

# image1.png

# image2.jpeg

# image3.png
No: 13-082 September 23, 2013

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

National Academy of Sciences Starts

NRC- Sponsored Cancer Risk Pilot Study

The National Academy of Sciences (NAS) has started the initial planning step of the Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission-sponsored pilot study of cancer risks in populations around six U.S. nuclear 

power plants and a nuclear fuel-cycle facility. The NRC is asking the Academy to carry out this pilot to 

help the agency determine whether to extend the study to additional U.S. reactors and fuel-cycle 

facilities.

NAS staff will be holding meetings in the next few months regarding the pilot study; meeting 

information will be posted on the Academy website 10 business days before a meeting. The pilot study, 

described in the staff’s update (SECY-12-0136) to the agency’s five Commissioners, will examine

cancer risks around each of the seven nuclear sites using two types of epidemiological studies. The first 

will examine multiple cancer types in populations of all ages living near the nuclear sites; the second 

will be a record-linkage-based case-control study of cancers in children born near the sites. The six

nuclear power plants are:

• Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Morris, ll.

• Millstone Power Station, Waterford, Conn.

• Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, Forked River, N.J. 

• Haddam Neck (decommissioned), Haddam Neck, Conn.

• Big Rock Point Nuclear Power Plant (decommissioned), Charlevoix, Mich. 

• San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (permanently shut down), San Clemente, Calif.

The Dresden and Millstone sites include both operating reactors and a decommissioned reactor. 

The pilot effort will also study Nuclear Fuel Services in Erwin, Tenn. NAS recommended these sites 

because they provide a good sampling of facilities with different operating histories, population sizes

around them, and expected levels of complexity in data retrieval from the relevant state cancer 

registries.

The NAS study aims to update and improve information on potential cancer risks around 

nuclear sites from the 1990 U.S. National Institutes of Health – National Cancer Institute (NCI) report, 

“Cancer in Populations Living Near Nuclear Facilities.” The NRC has used the 1990 NCI report as a

primary resource when communicating with the public about cancer risks in counties that contain or are 

adjacent to nuclear sites.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3500 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3500

  To provide for the conveyance of a small parcel of National Forest 
  System land in the Flathead National Forest in the State of Montana 
  containing a World War II memorial to the Whitefish Mountain Resort.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 18, 2011

  Mr. Rehberg (for himself and Mr. Miller of Florida) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for the conveyance of a small parcel of National Forest 
  System land in the Flathead National Forest in the State of Montana 
  containing a World War II memorial to the Whitefish Mountain Resort.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAND EXCHANGE, WORLD WAR II MEMORIAL, FLATHEAD NATIONAL 
              FOREST, STATE OF MONTANA.

    (a) Land Exchange Required.--In exchange for the land described in 
subsection (b), the Secretary of Agriculture shall convey to Whitefish 
Mountain Resort of Whitefish, Montana, all right, title, and interest 
of the United States in and to a parcel of National Forest System land 
consisting of approximately 625 square feet on Big Mountain in the 
Flathead National Forest in the State of Montana and containing a World 
War II memorial.
    (b) Consideration.--As consideration for the conveyance of the 
Federal land under subsection (a), Whitefish Mountain Resort shall 
convey to the Secretary a parcel of land in the State of Montana 
acceptable to the Secretary and approximately equal in value to the 
value of the Federal land.
    (c) Costs of Conveyance.--The Secretary and Whitefish Mountain 
Resort shall share equally the nominal costs associated with a land 
exchange of parcels of such small size.
    (d) Management of Acquired Land.--The land acquired by the 
Secretary under subsection (b) shall be added to the Flathead National 
Forest and managed in accordance with the laws, rules, and regulations 
applicable to the National Forest System. The Secretary shall modify 
the boundaries of the Flathead National Forest to reflect the 
conveyances under this section.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Network Engines, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Gregory A. Shortell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|Date: December 14, 2007 |  | /s/Gregory A. ShortellGregory A. Shortell Chief Executive
Officer
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-54,001] 

Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on January 14, 2004, in response to a worker petition filed on behalf of workers at Yellow Book USA, Effingham, Illinois. 

A negative determination applicable to the petitioning group of workers was issued on June 24, 2003 (TA-W-51,897). No new information is evident which would result in a reversal of the Department's previous determination. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose; and the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC this 16th day of January 2004. 

Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 04-2607 Filed 2-5-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
§ 8a.205 Educational institutions and other entities controlled by religious organizations. ( a ) *Exemption.* These Title IX regulations do not apply to any operation of an educational institution or other entity that is controlled by a religious organization to the extent that application of these Title IX regulations would not be consistent with the religious tenets of such organization.
( b ) *Exemption claims.* An educational institution or other entity that wishes to claim the exemption set forth in paragraph (a) of this section shall do so by submitting in writing to the designated agency official a statement by the highest-ranking official of the institution, identifying the provisions of these Title IX regulations that conflict with a specific tenet of the religious organization.
### SUBCHAPTER III—MAJOR DISASTER AND EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE ADMINISTRATION
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 21

                              List of Subsidiaries

                                              Jurisdiction of
                 Name                          Incorporation       Ownership
                 ----                         ---------------      ---------

Stratos Lightwave LLC                            Delaware            100%
Stratos Lightwave - Florida Incorporated         Delaware            100%
Bandwidth Semiconductor LLC                      Delaware            100%
Advanced Interconnection Technology LLC          Delaware            100%
MP Optical Communications LLC                    Illinois             60%
B&H Mold LLC                                     Delaware            100%
Stratos Limited                               United Kingdom         100%
Paracer, Inc.                                    Delaware            100%
Tsunami Optics, Inc.                            California           100%
§ 700.72 Compulsory process. ( a ) If a person refuses to permit a duly authorized representative of the Department of Commerce to have access to any premises or source of information necessary to the administration or enforcement of the Defense Production Act or this part, the Department of Commerce may seek compulsory process. Compulsory process means the institution of appropriate legal action, including *ex parte* application for an inspection warrant or its equivalent, in any forum of appropriate jurisdiction.
( b ) Compulsory process may be sought in advance of an audit, investigation, or other inquiry, if, in the judgment of the Director of the Office of Strategic Industries and Economic Security, U.S. Department of Commerce, in consultation with the Chief Counsel for Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce, there is reason to believe that a person will refuse to permit an audit, investigation, or other inquiry, or that other circumstances exist which make such process desirable or necessary.
[49 FR 30414, July 30, 1984. Redesignated at 54 FR 601, Jan. 9, 1989, as amended at 63 FR 31924, June 11, 1998; 67 FR 45633, July 10, 2002; 71 FR 39528, July 13, 2006; 79 FR 47570, Aug. 14, 2014]
No: 13-100 December 3, 2013

CONTACT: Holly Harrington, 301-415-8200

 

U.S. NRC Chairman Stresses Importance of Independent Regulator;

Lauds Cooperative Relationship with Korean Agency

SEOUL, REPUBLIC OF KOREA – The top nuclear regulator in the United States Tuesday said

nuclear regulators must be independent agencies within governments to ensure a consistent, safetybased approach to overseeing the use of nuclear materials.

NRC Chairman Allison M. Macfarlane also praised the relationship the NRC has with the 

Korean regulator, the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission.

“Having a regulator that is independent, well-funded, and backed by the government is essential 

to ensure effective oversight over nuclear operators,” Macfarlane said. “We work closely with our 

colleagues in Republic of Korea, and I hope to further strengthen our already strong relationship in 

coming years.”

Macfarlane is also chairman of the Multinational Design Evaluation Process (MDEP), an 

international organization that brings together national nuclear regulators considering similar new 

reactor designs to share knowledge and experience and thus strengthen safety.

One element of the MDEP organization looks at strengthening the integrity of the global nuclear 

supply chain.

“Like many others, the nuclear industry is truly global. Reactors in the United States get parts 

from abroad, and reactors abroad get parts from the United States. It is critical that all regulators work 

to ensure that only quality, properly approved parts enter the supply chain for this industry,” 

Macfarlane said.
### Part H—Comprehensive Geriatric Education

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 111–148, title V, §5310(b)(10)(B), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 631, redesignated part I "Comprehensive Geriatric Education" as H.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior part H, consisting of sections 297w and 297x, was redesignated part G of this subchapter.
NRC SCHEDULES MEETING TO DISCUSS 2010 PERFORMANCE

ASSESSMENT FOR SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a meeting for Friday, April 

29, to discuss the agency’s assessment of safety performance during 2010 at the Sequoyah 

nuclear power plant. The plant, operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority, is near SoddyDaisy, Tenn., about 16 miles northeast of Chattanooga.

An informal open house meeting in the Sequoyah Training Center, 2600 Igou Ferry Road 

in Soddy-Daisy, will begin with a presentation at 1 p.m. and end at 3 p.m. 

NRC staff will be available to answer questions on the safety performance of the 

Sequoyah plant, as well as the NRC role in ensuring safe plant operation. 

“The NRC evaluates nuclear power plants in a systemic and detailed way every year,” 

said NRC Region II Administrator Victor McCree. “The inspections and oversight at Sequoyah 

ensure that the plant is operated in a way that protects people and the environment.”

A letter sent from the NRC Region II office to plant officials addresses the performance 

of the plant during 2010 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on 

the NRC web site at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/seq_2010q4.pdf.

The NRC found that the Sequoyah plant met all NRC safety objectives during 2010. 

Based on that performance, the two Sequoyah units will receive detailed baseline NRC 

inspections in 2011. 

The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess plant 

performance. The colors start with “green,” which has very low safety significance, to “white,” 

“yellow” or “red,” based on the significance of the issues. Inspection findings and performance 

indicators are updated on the NRC’s web site (www.nrc.gov) each quarter.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No: II-11-026

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416

 April 20, 2011

E-mail: OPA2.Resource@nrc.gov
Current performance information for Sequoyah Unit 1 is available on the NRC web site 

at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/SEQ1/seq1_chart.html. Current information for 

Unit 2 is at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/SEQ2/seq2_chart.html. 

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.
SOUTH CENTRAL TENNESSEE RAILROAD COMPANY

SOUTH CENTRAL TENNESSEE RAILROAD CORPORATION

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

This is the decision of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning

the continued status of the South Central Tennessee Railroad

Company (SCTRC) as an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act

(RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (RUIA) and the

new status of the South Central Tennessee Railroad Corporation

(SCTR) as an employer under the Acts. The SCTRC was ruled to be an

employer effective July 1, 1978.

SCTRC ceased operations and its employees last performed

compensated service on December 31, 1993, when it merged into the

SCTR. On January 1, 1994 SCTR began actual operations and first

compensated its employees. According to the agreement of merger

between SCTRC and SCTR, SCTRC ceased its corporate existence on the

effective date of the merger which was December 31, 1993 . SCTR has

replaced SCTRC and now operates on the same line and uses the same

equipment as the former SCTRC.

Based on the information summarized above, it is the Board's 

determination that the South Central Tennessee Railroad Company

ceased being an employer under the RRA and RUIA on December 31,

1993 . It is also the Board's determination that the South Central 

Tennessee Railroad Corporation became an employer under the Acts 

administered by the Board on January 1, 1994.

BCD 1995-71.1 BA # 5561
II 

Calendar No. 339

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H.R. 2309

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 4, 2003

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

OCTOBER 27, 2003

Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2300 Redondo Avenue in Long Beach, California, as the ‘‘Stephen Horn Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 2300 Redondo Avenue in Long Beach, California, 

6 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Stephen Horn Post 

7 Office Building’’. 
2

•HR 2309 RS 

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

5 to the ‘‘Stephen Horn Post Office Building’’. 

Calendar No. 339

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2309

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2300 Redondo Avenue in 

Long Beach, California, as the ‘‘Stephen Horn Post Office Building’’. 

OCTOBER 27, 2003

Reported without amendment
#### § 1000.25 Office of Hazard Identification and Reduction.

The Office of Hazard Identification and Reduction, under the direction of the Assistant Executive Director for Hazard Identification and Reduction, is responsible for managing the Commission's Hazard Identification and Analysis Program and its Hazard Assessment and Reduction Program. The Office reports to the Executive Director, and has line authority over the Directorates for Epidemiology and Health Sciences, Economic Analysis, Engineering Sciences, and Laboratory Sciences. The Office develops strategies for and implements the agency's operating plans for these two hazard programs. This includes the collection and analysis of data to identify hazards and hazard patterns, the implementation of the Commission's safety standards development projects, the coordination of voluntary standards activities, and providing overall direction and evaluation of projects involving hazard analysis, data collection, emerging hazards, mandatory and voluntary standards, petitions, and labeling rules. The Office assures that relevant technical, environmental, economic, and social impacts of projects are comprehensively and objectively presented to the Commission for decision.
### **CHAPTER 145—PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICER MEDAL OF VALOR AND TRIBUTES**

Sec.
15201.
Authorization of Medal.
15202.
Medal of Valor Board.
15203.
Board personnel matters.
15204.
Definitions.
15205.
Authorization of appropriations.
15206.
National Medal of Valor Office.
15207.
Consultation requirement.
15208.
Law enforcement tribute acts.
### SUBCHAPTER II—REPORTING OF INFORMATION
### **CHAPTER 118—ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DEMENTIAS RESEARCH**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec.
11201.
Findings.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—COUNCIL ON ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE

11211, 11212. Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—ADVISORY PANEL ON ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE

11221 to 11223. Omitted.

#### SUBCHAPTER III–A—NATIONAL ALZHEIMER'S PROJECT

11225.
The National Alzheimer's Project.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—RESEARCH RELATING TO SERVICES FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DEMENTIAS AND THEIR FAMILIES

11231, 11232. Repealed or Transferred.
11241 to 11243. Repealed or Transferred.

#### Part 1—Responsibilities of National Institute of Mental Health

11251.
Research program and plan.
11252.
Dissemination.
11253.
Authorization of appropriations.

#### Part 2—Responsibilities of Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

11261.
Research program.
11262.
Dissemination.
11263.
Authorization of appropriations.

#### Part 3—Responsibilities of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

11271.
Research program and plan.
11272.
Dissemination.
11273.
Authorization of appropriations.
11281 to 11283. Repealed or Transferred.

#### SUBCHAPTER V—EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES

11291.
Providing information for personnel of Social Security Administration.
11292.
Education of public, individuals with Alzheimer's disease and their families, and health and long-term care providers.
11293.
Education programs for safety and transportation personnel.
11294.
Authorization of appropriations.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 102–507, §2(b), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3281, struck out "SERVICES" before "RESEARCH" in chapter heading.