alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3477 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

133 Hare Road in Crosby, Texas, as the Army First Sergeant David 

McNerney Post Office Building. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2011 

Mr. POE of Texas (for himself, Mr. PAUL, Mr. CARTER, Mr. MCCAUL, Mr. 

MARCHANT, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, Mr. HINOJOSA, Ms. GRANGER, Ms. 

JACKSON LEE of Texas, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. FLORES, Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. BRADY of Texas, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of 

Texas, Mr. OLSON, Mr. FARENTHOLD, Mr. THORNBERRY, Mr. CANSECO, 

Mr. HALL, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. BARTON of Texas, Mr. 

CUELLAR, Mr. REYES, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mr. AL GREEN of Texas, Mr. 

HENSARLING, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas, Ms. EDDIE

BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina, Mr. BOUSTANY, Mr. CHAFFETZ, Ms. HAYWORTH, Mr. BACA, and Mr. PENCE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 133 Hare Road in Crosby, Texas, as the 

Army First Sergeant David McNerney Post Office Building. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3477 IH

1 SECTION 1. ARMY FIRST SERGEANT DAVID MCNERNEY 

2 POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 133 Hare Road in Crosby, Texas, 

5 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Army First Ser6 geant David McNerney Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Army First Sergeant 

11 David McNerney Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kevin O’Connell, Appellant.

[820 NYS2d 922]

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s motion to be relieved of assignment granted *(see People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38 [1979]). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Ronald H. Tills, A.J. — Attempted Robbery, 2nd Degree). Present— Pigott, Jr., P.J., Kehoe, Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.
No: III-14-003 February 4, 2014

CONTACT: Viktoria Mitlyng, 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil, 630-829-9663

NRC Cites LaSalle Unit 2 for an Issue Involving a Reactor Shutdown

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff issued a finding to the LaSalle nuclear plant Unit 2 

for failing to adhere to a procedure, which resulted in a manual shutdown. The two-unit plant operated 

by Exelon Generation Co., is located in Marseilles, Ill., approximately 11 miles southeast of Ottawa.

NRC inspectors identified the finding during a September 2013 inspection at the plant. The 

finding involved the failure of the plant staff to perform certain procedural steps in accordance with

existing procedures. As a result approximately a foot of circulating water flowed into a small area in the 

turbine building, triggering intake pumps to shut off and a loss of normal heat removal, which led to a 

reactor shutdown.

“Even though the issue did not have an impact on the public, the NRC expects plants to make 

conservative decisions when planning or executing work activities. They need to follow procedures in 

order to ensure the safety of plant workers, the public and environment,” said NRC Region III 

Administrator Cynthia D. Pederson. 

The NRC will conduct a supplemental inspection to review the plants corrective actions such as 

additional training activities for operators, procedure revisions and whether plant staff understood the 

cause of the problem.

The NRC evaluates a nuclear power plant’s performance with a color-coded process that 

classifies regulatory findings as green, white, yellow or red, in order of increasing safety significance. 

After considering the information regarding this violation at LaSalle, the NRC staff has characterized 

the inspection finding as white or as having a low to moderate safety significance.

The company has 30 days to contest the finding. The NRC inspection letter detailing the final 

determination will be publically available via ADAMS.
No: II-14-053 October 20, 2014

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416

NRC Returns All Three Browns Ferry Nuclear Units 

to Normal Oversight and Inspection 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has returned all three units at the Browns Ferry

nuclear plant to the agency’s normal levels of inspection and oversight for the first time in more than 

four years. 

The Browns Ferry plant is operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority and is located near 

Athens, Ala., about 32 miles west of Huntsville. 

The increased oversight ended when NRC officials completed an inspection of the most recent 

issue at Browns Ferry. It involved staffing needed in the event of an emergency in the plant’s control 

room. The NRC issued an order confirming actions TVA is taking to address the issue. The NRC 

inspection verified that the steps are appropriate to maintain the needed staffing levels and the agency 

considers the issue closed.

“The Browns Ferry plant has made significant improvements in safety performance,” said NRC 

Region II Administrator Victor McCree. “Even though the plant’s three units are returning to normal 

oversight, we will continue to monitor and inspect the implementation of their improvement plan and 

the overall safety culture.”

The NRC has three resident inspectors at the Browns Ferry plant who are mostly responsible for 

completing the agency’s normal, but still extensive, inspections. Those inspectors are also assisted by 

specialist inspectors from the NRC regional office in Atlanta.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6447

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMES A. BUTLER, a/k/a Willie James Butler,

a/k/a John Thomas, a/k/a Grady,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 05-6495

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMES A. BUTLER, a/k/a Willie James Butler,

a/k/a John Thomas, a/k/a Grady,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior

District Judge. (CR-91-44)

Submitted: September 27, 2005 Decided: September 30, 2005
- 2 -

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James A. Butler, Appellant Pro Se. Gurney Wingate Grant, II, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

James A. Butler appeals the district court’s orders

denying his motions for correction of sentence under Fed. R. Civ.

P. 60 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 36 and for reconsideration. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for

the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.

Butler, No. CR-91-44 (Jan. 27, 2005; Mar. 15, 2005). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
CERTIFICATION OF
                           CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Amended Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB of
Service Air Group, Inc. (f/k/a Segway V Corp.) for the year ending December 31,
2004, I, Mohammad Sultan, Chief Financial Officer and I, Jag Dhillon, Chief
Executive Officer of Service Air Group, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   Such Amended Year End Report of Form 10-KSB for the year ending
          December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Amended Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB
          for the year ended December 31, 2004 fairly represents in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Service
          Air Group, Inc.

Dated:    March 24, 2005

SERVICE AIR GROUP, INC.


By:  /s/ Mohammad Sultan
-----------------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer


By:  /s/ Jag Dhillon
-----------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

In connection with the annual report of BidGive International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the
year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
James P. Walker, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> (1)        
>  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
> Exchange Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
> condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/  James P. Walker, Jr.James P. Walker, Jr.Chief Executive Officer

Date:  April 14, 2004
#### Lillian V. Schraig, Respondent, v. James V. Schraig, Appellant.

No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Peek,"P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
#### Agnes Connolly, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. Clausen-Flanagan Brewery, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment entered upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

Per Curiam:

On the authority of *Schaffer*v. *Baker Transfer Co.*(29 App. Div. 459) and *Connaughton*v. *Sun Printing & Pub. Assn.*(73 id. 316), the judgment and order appealed from are reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event, unless plaintiff stipulated to reduce the verdict to the sum of $3,000, in which event the judgment as so reduced and the order appealed from are affirmed, without costs. Present—Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Smith, JJ. Judgment and order reversed, new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event, unless plaintiff stipulates to reduce verdict to $3,000, in which event the judgment as so modified and order affirmed, without costs. Order to be settled on notice.
#### Hugh K. Bennett, Respondent, v. Boyouk Kazvini et al., Defendants, and Walter Hart, Inc., Intervener, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Breitel, JJ. [See *post, p.*835.]
1 The Honorable Gregory W. Carman, Chief Judge, United States Court of

International Trade, sitting by designation.

2 The Honorable Jean Hamilton, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 99-3037

___________ Brian Finney, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Eastern District of Missouri. * Dave Dormire, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: April 10, 2000 Filed: April 21, 2000

___________ Before BOWMAN and HANSEN, Circuit Judges, and CARMAN, 1 Judge.

___________ PER CURIAM. Brian Finney appeals from the order of the District Court 2 denying Finney's petitionfor a writ of habeas corpus. Challenging his state-court conviction and sentence on charges of first degree burglary, first degree robbery, armed criminal action, and felonious restraint, Finney's habeas petition raised seven grounds for habeas-2-

relief. In a thorough and well-reasoned opinion, the District Court rejected all of Finney's claims and dismissed his petition. The District Court then granted a certificate of appealability on all seven of Finney's claims, and Finney reasserts them on appeal. Having considered the case, we conclude that the District Court correctly disposedof all of Finney's claims. Because an extended opinion by this Court would add nothing of substance to the District Court's comprehensive opinion, we affirm on the basis of that opinion. AFFIRMED. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
### §10144. Consideration of effect of acquisition of water rights

The Secretary shall give full consideration to whether the development, construction, and operation of a repository may require any purchase or other acquisition of water rights that will have a significant adverse effect on the present or future development of the area in which such repository is located. The Secretary shall mitigate any such adverse effects to the maximum extent practicable.

(Pub. L. 97–425, title I, §124, Jan. 7, 1983, 96 Stat. 2229.)
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 341 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to increase certain infrastructure 

finance provisions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 19, 2011 

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to increase certain 

infrastructure finance provisions, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Transportation Infra5 structure Finance and Innovation Act of 2011’’ or 

6 ‘‘TIFIA of 2011’’. 

7 SEC. 2. SECURED LOANS. 

8 (a) MAXIMUM AMOUNT.—Section 603(b) of title 23, 

9 United States Code, is amended as follows: 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 341 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (2) by striking ‘‘33’’ and in2 serting ‘‘49’’; and 

3 (2) in paragraph (6) by inserting after ‘‘project 

4 obligations’’ the following: ‘‘entered into after (not 

5 including such obligations issued to refund prior 

6 project obligations), or not contemplated by the par7 ties at the time, the agreement to provide the se8 cured loan is entered into under this section’’. 

9 SEC. 3. LINES OF CREDIT. 

10 Section 604(b) of title 23, United States Code, is 

11 amended as follows: 

12 (1) in paragraph (2) by striking ‘‘33’’ and in13 serting ‘‘49’’; and 

14 (2) in paragraph (8) by inserting after ‘‘project 

15 obligations’’ the following: ‘‘entered into after (not 

16 including such obligations issued to refund prior 

17 project obligations), or not contemplated by the par18 ties at the time, the agreement to provide the line 

19 of credit is entered into under this section’’. 

20 SEC. 4. FUNDING. 

21 Section 608(a) of title 23, United States Code, is 

22 amended as follows: 

23 (1) in paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘each of fiscal 

24 years 2005 through 2009.’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 341 IH

1 year 2011 and $285,000,000 for each of fiscal years 

2 2012 through 2016.’’; and 

3 (2) in paragraph (3) by striking ‘‘each of fiscal 

4 years 2005 through 2009.’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal 

5 year 2011 and $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 

6 2012 through 2016.’’ 

Æ 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
H. R. 3412 

One Hundred Twelfth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twelve 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1421 Veterans 

Memorial Drive in Abbeville, Louisiana, as the ‘‘Sergeant Richard Franklin Abshire 

Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SERGEANT RICHARD FRANKLIN ABSHIRE POST OFFICE 

BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 1421 Veterans Memorial Drive in Abbeville, 

Louisiana, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant Richard 

Franklin Abshire Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Sergeant Richard Franklin Abshire Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### David D’Amico *v.*Clifford J. Willis, Chief of Police of the City of New Britain

*F. Gina Gelb,*in support of the petition.

*Joseph E. Shelly, Jr.,*in opposition.

Decided February 2, 1988

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 13 Conn. App. 124, is denied.
No: II-15-010 March 13, 2015

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

 Joey Ledford 404-997-4416

NRC Issues Order to Honeywell to Address Discrimination Concerns

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a confirmatory order to Honeywell 

International, Inc., requiring new training, communications, policies and guidance following an 

incident in which a contractor for the company terminated an employee, allegedly in part because the 

employee reported smelling alcohol on a supervisor’s breath while on duty.

The apparent violation stemming from the incident resulted in Honeywell’s request for an 

Alternative Dispute Resolution session. The ADR process uses a neutral mediator with no decisionmaking authority to assist the NRC and its licensees in reaching an agreement when there are 

differences regarding an enforcement action. An ADR session conducted on Dec. 9, 2014, resulted in 

an agreement for the NRC to issue an order outlining corrective actions to be taken by Honeywell.

As part of the agreement, the NRC refrained from issuing a Notice of Violation or proposing a 

civil penalty against Honeywell, and Honeywell neither admitted nor denied that a violation occurred.

The process stemmed from an NRC investigation into whether a Honeywell contractor, 

Bluestone, LLC, terminated one of its employees at the Honeywell Metropolis Works in Metropolis, 

Ill., after the employee informed both Bluestone and Honeywell of a safety concern, namely that the 

employee had smelled alcohol on the breath of an immediate supervisor onsite during duty hours. 

Bluestone is no longer a Honeywell contractor.

Under the terms of the order, some of which also apply to two other Honeywell facilities, the 

company has agreed to have its senior managers conduct presentations to advise employees about the 

company’s policies encouraging the reporting of employee concerns. The company will also present 

training on the issue and will modify processes providing for ongoing management support for 

employee protection requirements. In addition, the company will review and update its Safety 

Conscious Work Environment Policy and incorporate applicable aspects of NRC’s Safety Culture 

Policy as appropriate.
#### Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Appellant, v. First National Bank *&*Trust Company of Paterson, New Jersey, Defendant, and The People of the State of New York, Respondent.

Motion for reargument denied. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. [See 281 App. Div. 607.]
OIL AND GAS WELL COMPLETION REPORT PAGE 1

Form05_OG_WellCompletionRpt_FI20150604.doc 6/4 /2015 LV STATE OF NEVADA

COMMISSION ON MINERAL RESOURCES



## DIVISION OF MINERALS

400 W. King Street, Suite 106

Carson City, Nevada 89703

(775) 684

- 7040 | Fax (775) 684

- 7052

http://minerals.nv.gov

OIL AND GAS WELL COMPLETION REPORT

(To be filed not later than 15 days after well is completed/abandoned)

GEOLOGICAL FORMATIONS

NAME TOP BOTTOM NAME TOP BOTTOM

1. 6.

2. 7.

3. 8.

4. 9.

5. 10.

GAS OR OIL SANDS AND OR ZONES

1. TOP BOTTOM 5. TOP BOTTOM

2. TOP BOTTOM 6. TOP BOTTOM

3. TOP BOTTOM 7. TOP BOTTOM

4. TOP BOTTOM 8. TOP BOTTOM

IMPORTANT WATER SANDS

Give data on rate of inflow a nd elevation to which water rose in hole. T.D.

1. TOP BOTTOM REMARKS

2. TOP BOTTOM REMARKS

3. TOP BOTTOM REMARKS

4. TOP BOTTOM REMARKS

RECORD OF DRILL STEM TESTS AND SPECIAL TESTS

(Submit reports on separate sheet showing depths, dates, durati on of tests, results and attach hereto)

CASING RECORD

Size Weight (lb) per

foot Make Amount

Set Shoe Perforated Amount

Pulled Purpose From To

1

2

3

4

5

6 

### WELL LOCATION

Section

Locate well correctly. Company Lease

Address

Well No. in 1/4 of 1/4 of Sec.

T. , R. M.D.B.&M. Field

UTM Northing N; UTM Easting E (NAD 83 Datum)

County Permit Number

Drilling Commenced Completed

Drilling Contractor

Address

Total Depth of Well

Elevation above sea level in feet: Surface KB

Metho d determination ORIGINAL

– Company

DUPLICATE

– Division

TRIPLICATE

– NBM&GOIL AND GAS WELL COMPLETION REPORT PAGE 2

Form05_OG_WellCompletionRpt_FI20150604.doc 6/4 /2015 LV CEMENTING RECORD

Size of hole Size of casing Where set No. sacks of

cement Method used CMT. Density Yield Cement

ft./sxs

1

2

3

4

RECORD OF SHOOTING OR CHEMICAL TREATMENT

Size Shell

used Explosive or

chemical used Quantity Dat e Depth Treated Depth

cleaned out From To

1

2

3

PRODUCTION

Put on production , 20 . Time: (a.m.) (p.m.)

FOR FLOWING WELL:

Flowing pressure on casing lbs/sq.in.

Flowing pressure on tubing lbs/sq.in.

Size of tubing No. feet run

Size of choke Make choke

FOR PUMPING WELL:

Length of stroke used inches

Number strokes per minut e Size of working barrel

FOR OIL WELL:

Production of first 24 hours was barrels of fluid

Percent water

Percent sediment

Percent em ulsion

Gas

- oil ratio this well (cu. ft. gas per barrel of oil)

FOR GAS WELL:

Cubic feet of gas first 24 hours

Gallons of gasoline per MCF gas

LOGS AND ADDITIONAL RECORDS

Type of Survey Top Bottom Date Company

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

Attach to this record two (2) copies of all formational, electrical, radioactivity logs and deviation surveys.

I hereby certify that the information given herewith is a true, correct and complete re cord of this well and all work done

on it so far as can be determined from the available records.

Name Position

Company / Operator

Address City St. Zip Code

Date
### Part C—Admission to Hospitals and Outpatient Facilities; Confidentiality of Records

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Part consists of part C and portions of part D of title III of Pub. L. 91–616. Part B of such title enacted section 2688j–2 of this title. Part D, in addition to enacting section 4582 of this title, amended sections 246 and 2688h of this title.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Harry Schweitzer, Respondent, against Barnett Goldsmith, Appellant. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

*688Present — Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ.