alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 922
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

§ 922.214 Emergency regulations. ( a ) Where necessary to prevent or minimize the destruction of, loss of, or injury to a Sanctuary resource, or to minimize the imminent risk of such destruction, loss, or injury, any and all activities are subject to immediate temporary regulation, including prohibition. An emergency regulation shall not take effect without the approval of the Governor of Wisconsin or her/his designee or designated agency.
( b ) Emergency regulations remain in effect until a date fixed in the rule or six months after the effective date, whichever is earlier. The rule may be extended once for not more than six months.
No: 14-088 December 11, 2014

CONTACT: Maureen Conley, 301-415-8200 

NRC’s Advisory Committee On Reactor Safeguards Elects 2015 Leadership

And Confirms Meeting Schedule

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) 

has re-elected John W. Stetkar as Chairman and elected Dennis Bley as Vice-Chairman and Michael 

Corradini as Member-at-Large.

The ACRS, a group of experienced technical experts, advises the Commission, independently 

from the NRC staff, on safety issues related to the licensing and operation of nuclear power plants as 

well as issues of health physics and radiation protection.

The complete listing of the ACRS membership and their bios can be found on the ACRS web 

page.

The confirmed ACRS 2015 full-committee meeting schedule is available on the NRC website.
Appendix C PICTURES FROM THE SAMPLING EPISODEC

- 1 Figure C - 1. Sampler Working Inside a “Cleanbox”C

- 2 Figure C - 2 . Sample Tap and Tubing at the Influent to the FGD Wastewater Treatment SystemC

- 3 Figure C - 3 . Sample Collection at the Influent to the FGD Wastewater Treatment SystemC

- 4 Figure C - 4 . Sample Collection Set Up at the Pump - Off StationC

- 5 Figure C - 5 . Composite Sample Collection Set Up at the Effluent from the FGD Wastewater Treatment System
From: "Cassidy Mike" <MICHAEL.CASSIDY@kohler.com>

To: Jeff Telander/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 06/22/2010 02:32 PM

Subject: RE: Clarification Of Kohler Testing Proposal

Jeff,

As requested in this morning's telephone conversation, attached is a

listing that summarizes our scope of work proposal for the ICR. Our

proposal involves:

1) Kilns: Testing all (6) of the 1F tunnel kilns listed in the ICR

with changes made to test for PM filterable (RM5 front-half) rather than

PM2.5 and to only test cooling stacks that measure 20.5% oxygen or less.

During the emissions test program, all tunnel kiln stacks will be

measured for oxygen levels and stack gas flow (Ref Meths 1-3).

2) Ware Dryers: Testing five of the 6 ware dryers listed in the ICR.

Some dryers have multiple stacks, and representative stacks will be

tested as shown in the attachment. For any stack not tested, air flow

(RMs 1&2) will be measured during the emissions test of the dryer.

3) Spray Booths: Testing 10 of the spray booths identified in the ICR.

All 1F glaze is spray applied in booths with wet (water) overspray

control devices; no dry filter booths are used. Glaze is applied with

identical spray gun technology, but guns can be operated robotically,

automatically (fixed gun location), or manually. The 10 booths we've

proposed to test include 4 robotically controlled, 3 automatically

controlled, and 3 manually controlled. Emissions from these 10 booths

are representative of emissions of all other booths in operation as they

are all similar in booth design and spray technology. Our proposal

includes testing for PM filterable (RM5 front-half) rather than PM2.5

filterable, and to estimate metals emissions based on glaze composition

rather than RM 29.

We also discussed the following approaches to completing the ICR:

1) Using more than one test contractor to shorten turn-around time: We

agreed that involving more than one contractor may introduce variability

into the results that is unacceptable for HAPs such as D/F and metals

that may be emitted in ultra trace quantities and that it makes the most

sense not to introduce this variability, so one contractor and

analytical lab will be used.

2) Shortening the analytical time and ERT submittal: We will solicit

proposals for priority TATs and will select a contractor familiar with

EPA's ERT to help expedite results transmittal to EPA.

This information is intended to supplement our written proposal

submitted to you on June 10, 2010, and requests written approval of this

proposal. Please contact me with any questions.

Mike
No: II-13-056 August 29, 2013

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416 

NRC Assigns New Resident Inspector to Turkey Point Nuclear Power Plant

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Atlanta have selected 

Matthew Endress as the resident inspector for Florida Power & Light Co.’s 

Turkey Point nuclear power plant, located near Homestead, Fla., about 20 miles 

south of Miami. Endress joins NRC Senior Resident Inspector Tim Hoeg at the 

Turkey Point site. 

Endress joined the NRC in January 2011 as a reactor inspector in the 

NRC’s Region II office in Atlanta in the Division of Reactor Safety. Prior to 

joining the NRC, he served in the U.S. Navy as a nuclear-trained submarine 

warfare officer and also worked as a process engineer in the food and beverage industry. 

Endress received a bachelor of science degree in chemical engineering from the Georgia 

Institute of Technology and holds a master’s degree in business administration from Arizona State 

University.

“Matt Endress has the experience and dedication to carry out the NRC mission of protecting 

people and the environment by helping to ensure the safety of the Turkey Point plant,” said NRC 

Region II Administrator Victor McCree. 

At least two NRC resident inspectors are assigned to each operating U.S. commercial nuclear 

plant. They serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major 

work projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. Resident inspectors can serve at a 

reactor site for up to seven years. 

The Turkey Point resident inspectors can be reached at 305-245-7669.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                 Certification
                                      of
                              Service 1st Bancorp
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 regarding
   Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004


      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Service 1st Bancorp, a California corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify that:

      1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
         September 30, 2004 (the "Form 10-QSB") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
         Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2. Information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.



Dated:      November 12, 2004    /s/ JOHN O. BROOKS
                                 --------------------------------
                                     John O. Brooks
                                     Chief Executive Officer



Dated:      November 12, 2004    /s/ ROBERT E. BLOCH
                                 --------------------------------
                                     Robert E. Bloch
                                     Executive Vice President and
                                     Chief Financial Officer

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Service 1st Bancorp and will be retained by Service 1st
Bancorp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

                                                                 Page 87 of 87
### **CHAPTER 142—POISON CONTROL CENTER ENHANCEMENT AND AWARENESS**
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-15-0001: 2014 Annual Report on Commission Adjudication

Accession Number: ML15007A262

Date Released: Thursday, January 22, 2015

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML15007A288 - SECY-15-0001:  2014 Annual Report on Commission Adjudication (7 page(s), 1/5/2015)
    - ML15007A294 - SECY-15-0001: Attachment 1, 2014 Annual Charts on Commission Adjudication (6 page(s), 1/5/2015)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
§ 18.7 Allowable fees and expenses. ( a ) Awards will be based on rates customarily charged by persons engaged in the business of acting as attorneys, agents and expert witnesses, even if the services were made available without charge or at a reduced rate to the applicant.
( b ) No award for the fee of an attorney or agent under this rule may exceed $75.00 per hour. No award to compensate an expert witness may exceed the highest rate at which the Department pays expert witnesses. However, an award may also include the reasonable expenses of the attorney, agent, or witness as a separate item, if the attorney, agent, or witness ordinarily charges clients separately for such expenses.
( c ) In determining the reasonableness of the fee sought for an attorney, agent, or expert witness, the adjudicative officer shall consider the following: ( 1 ) If the attorney, agent, or witness is in private practice, his or her customary fee for similar services, or, if an employee of the applicant, the fully allocated cost of the services;
( 2 ) The prevailing rate for similar services in the community in which the attorney, agent or witness ordinarily performs services;
( 3 ) The time actually spent in the representation of the applicant;
( 4 ) The time reasonably spent in light of the difficulty or complexity of the issues in the proceedings; and
( 5 ) Such other factors as may bear on the value of the services provided.
( d ) The reasonable cost of any study, analysis, engineering report, test, project, or similar matter prepared on behalf of a party may be awarded, to the extent that the charge for the service does not exceed the prevailing rate for similar services, and the study or other matter was necessary for preparation of the applicant's case.
[47 FR 13510, Mar. 31, 1982, as amended at 53 FR 6799, Mar. 3, 1988]
§ 1018.27 Public participation. ( a ) The Commission is committed to a policy of encouraging public participation in its activities and will hold all advisory committee meetings open to the public.
( b ) The guidelines in section 8(c) of OMB Circular A-63 shall be followed in providing public access to advisory committee meetings.
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 21.1

                        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANTS




Madison River Management Company    (Delaware)
Madison River Holdings Corp.    (Delaware)
Madison River LTD Funding Corp.    (Delaware)
Gallatin River Holdings L.L.C.    (Delaware)
Gallatin River Communications L.L.C.    (Delaware)
MEBTEL, Inc.    (North Carolina)
Madison River Communications, LLC    (Delaware)
Gulf Communications, LLC    (Delaware)
Gulf Coast Services, Inc.    (Alabama)
Gulf Telephone Company    (Alabama)
Gulf Long Distance, Inc.    (Alabama)
Madison River Long Distance Solutions, Inc.    (Delaware)
Coastal Communications, Inc.    (Delaware)
Coastal Utilities, Inc.    (Georgia)
Coastal Long Distance Services, Inc.    (Georgia)
Savannah River Communications, LLC (Delaware)
EXHIBIT 32.1

                      CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE 1st BANCORP
  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 REGARDING QUARTERLY
            REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2006


         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of Service 1st Bancorp, a California corporation
("Bancorp"), does hereby certify that:

1.       Bancorp's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June
         30, 2006 (the "Form 10-QSB") fully complies with the requirements of
         Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
         amended; and

2.       Information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         Bancorp.




Date: August 11, 2006                    By: /s/ JOHN O. BROOKS
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             John O. Brooks
                                             Chief Executive Officer
                                             (Principal Executive Officer)

Date: August 11, 2006                    By: /s/ ROBERT E. BLOCH
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Robert E. Bloch
                                             Executive Vice President and
                                             Chief financial Officer
                                             (Principal Financial and
                                             Accounting Officer)



         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Service 1st Bancorp and will be retained by Service 1st Bancorp
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

                                       27
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Knightsbridge Resources Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period end of September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Ron Schmitz, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 17th day of August, 2007.



| | RON SCHMITZ                                        
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Ron Schmitz                                        
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

























---
#### Pier Busseti Viaggi E Crociere S. A., Appellant, v. Pier Busseti, New York, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion to strike allegations of the complaint denied. No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7357

EDWIN CRUZ,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GENE M. JOHNSON, Director,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District

Judge. (7:07-cv-00185-jet)

Submitted: December 13, 2007 Decided: December 21, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edwin Cruz, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney

General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Edwin Cruz seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order

is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000).

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v.

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S.

473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Cruz

has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability, deny Cruz’s motion for appointment of

counsel, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Exhibit 12.2
 Endeavour International Corporation
Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges
and Preference Securities Dividends
 Year Ended December 31,2009
    
    2008
    
    2007Earnings:Income (Loss) before Taxes
    
    $
    (94,687
    )
    
    $
    49,975
    
    
    $
    (72,353
    )Add: Fixed charges
    
    
    40,908
    
    
    
    37,781
    
    
    
    36,878Less: Capitalized interest
    
    
    (3,067
    )
    
    
    (3,998
    )
    
    
    (6,358
    )Earnings
    
    $
    (50,712
    )
    
    $
    91,754
    
    
    $
    (29,117
    )Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    16,630
    
    
    $
    22,974
    
    
    $
    19,282Preferred dividends
    
    
    21,211
    
    
    
    10,809
    
    
    
    11,238Capitalized interest
    
    
    3,067
    
    
    
    3,998
    
    
    
    6,358Total fixed charges
    
    $
    40,908
    
    
    $
    37,781
    
    
    $
    36,878Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2.4
    
    
    
    
### SUBCHAPTER IV—AERONAUTICS
### SUBCHAPTER III—COMMUNITY PROGRAM
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3447 

To require proprietary institutions of higher education to derive not less 

than 10 percent of such institutions’ revenues from sources other than 

veterans’ education benefits or funds provided under title IV of the 

Higher Education Act of 1965. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2011 

Mr. QUIGLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To require proprietary institutions of higher education to 

derive not less than 10 percent of such institutions’ 

revenues from sources other than veterans’ education 

benefits or funds provided under title IV of the Higher 

Education Act of 1965. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans’ Education 

5 Protection Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3447 IH

1 SEC. 2. REVISION OF 90–10 RULE. 

2 (a) REVISION OF 90–10 RULE.—Section 487(a)(24) 

3 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 

4 1094(a)(24)) is amended by inserting after ‘‘other than’’ 

5 the following: ‘‘veterans’ education benefits (as defined in 

6 section 480(c)) or’’. 

7 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The heading for 

8 subsection (d) of section 487 of the Higher Education Act 

9 of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1094(d)) is amended by inserting after 

10 ‘‘NON-TITLE IV’’ the following: ‘‘AND NON-VETERANS’ 

11 EDUCATION BENEFITS’’. 

12 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

13 The amendment made by section 2 shall be effective 

14 July 1, 2012. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### Part A—State Mental Health Service Programs
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CLASSIFICATION OUTLINE 

CLASS A - GENERAL WORKS

(Click each subclass for details) 

Subclass AC Collections. Series. Collected works

Subclass AE Encyclopedias

Subclass AG Dictionaries and other general reference works

Subclass AI Indexes

Subclass AM Museums. Collectors and collecting

Subclass AN Newspapers

Subclass AP Periodicals

Subclass AS Academies and learned societies

Subclass AY Yearbooks. Almanacs. Directories

Subclass AZ History of scholarship and learning. The humanities
Subclass AC 

AC1-999 Collections. Series. Collected works

AC1-195 Collections of monographs, essays, etc.

AC1-8 American and English

AC9-195 Other languages

AC200 Collections for Jewish readers

AC801-895 Inaugural and program dissertations

AC901-995 Pamphlet collections

AC999 Scrapbooks
Subclass AE 

AE1-(90) Encyclopedias 

AE5-(90) By language 
Subclass AG 

AG2-600 Dictionaries and other general reference works 
Subclass AI 

AI1-21 Indexes 
Subclass AM 

AM1-(501) Museums. Collectors and collecting

AM10-100 By country

AM111-160 Museology. Museum methods, technique, etc.

AM200-(501) Collectors and collecting
Subclass AN 

AN Newspapers 
Subclass AP 

AP1-(271) Periodicals

AP101-115 Humorous periodicals

AP200-230 Juvenile periodicals

AP(250)-(265) Periodicals for women

AP(270)-(271) Periodicals for Blacks
Subclass AS 

AS1-945 Academies and learned societies 

AS2.5-4 International associations, congresses, conferences, etc. 

AS11-785 By region or country
Subclass AY 

AY10-2001 Yearbooks. Almanacs. Directories

AY10-29 Annuals

AY30-1730 Almanacs

AY2001 Directories. General works on the compilation of 

directories, etc. 

Class directories by subject in B-Z 
Subclass AZ 

AZ(20)-999 History of scholarship and learning. The humanities

AZ101-(181) Philosophy. Theory

AZ191-193 Evaluation

AZ200-361 History

AZ501-908 By region or country
No. II-11-009 March 17, 2011

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416

NRC CANCELS CRYSTAL RIVER PLANT RESTART MEETING

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has cancelled a meeting to discuss the restart 

of the Crystal River plant after indications of a new separation or gap in the concrete 

containment.

The meeting was scheduled to be held at 1 p.m. on Tuesday, March 22 near the plant, 

which is operated by Progress Energy on the west coast of Florida about 80 miles north of 

Tampa. A similar meeting will be scheduled by the NRC in the area before the plant restarts. 

Progress Energy has reported that there are indications of additional separation or gap 

resulting from the repair work on the original containment wall. NRC inspectors will closely 

follow Progress Energy’s analyses as well as any planned repairs. 

The Crystal River plant shut down in the fall of 2009 for a planned refueling outage that 

included replacement of the steam generators. To move the large steam generators into the 

containment building, workers removed concrete to create the necessary opening. During that 

work, the plant staff discovered a separation or gap in the concrete containment wall. The Crystal 

River plant has been shut down since then while Progress Energy investigated the cause of the 

gap and repaired the concrete containment. 

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov