alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### O. C. Wilson Advertising Company, Appellee, v. Louis T. Orr and J. L. Donahue, Appellants.

Gen. No. 21,425.

1. Contracts, § *385*
      ***
      *-—when evidence sufficient to sustain finding as to existence of contract for advertising and compliance therewith.*In an action to recover for advertising, evidence examined, and *held*to warrant a finding that defendants made a joint original promise to pay for the insertion of advertising in plaintiff’s newspapers, and that plaintiff caused the insertion of the advertisements in accordance with the terms of defendants’ promise.

2. Evidence, § *110*
      ***
      *—when act of publishing newspaper may be proved without producing newspaper.*In an action to recover for advertising, it is not error to admit evidence that advertisements were inserted in newspapers without the production of the newspapers containing the advertisements, since the act of publishing a document regarded as distinct from its terms may he proved without producing it.

3. Contracts, § *384*
      ***
      *—-when evidence sufficient to sustain verdict*
      *608
      *in action for advertising.*In an action to recover for advertising, evidence examined and *held*sufficient to sustain a verdict for plaintiff.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Joseph E. Ryan, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the October term, 1915.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed January 31, 1916.

Rehearing denied February 14, 1916.

Cavender & Kaiser, for appellants; Donald L. Morrill, of counsel.

Beck & Mies, for appellee.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice Baker

delivered the opinion of the court.

This appeal brings in review a judgment for nine hundred and ninety dollars entered on the verdict of a jury in an action brought by the appellee against the appellants in the Municipal Court.

From the evidence we think that the jury might properly find that the defendants made to the plaintiff a joint original promise to pay for certain advertising which the plaintiff was to insert in certain newspapers, and that the plaintiff caused the advertisements agreed on to be inserted in newspapers in accordance with the terms of defendants’ promise.

The contention of appellants that the court erred in admitting evidence that the advertisements were inserted in newspapers without producing the papers is without merit. The act of publishing a document regarded as distinct from the terms of the document may be proved without production. 2 Wigmore on Evidence, sec. 1248; *City of Des Moines v. Casady,*21 Iowa 572; *Moore v.*Gilliam, 5 Mun. (Va.) 348; *Dingle v. City of Chicago,*172 Ill. 170; *McChesney v. People,*178 Ill. 542.

The evidence is, in our opinion, ample to sustain the verdict, we find in the record no reversible error in procedure, and the judgment of the Municipal Court is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
NRC ASSIGNS NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR TO

HOPE CREEK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in the agency’s Region I Office 

in King of Prussia, Pa., have selected Fred Bower as the new senior resident 

inspector for the Hope Creek nuclear power plant in Hancocks Bridge (Salem 

County), N.J. He joins Amar Patel, the NRC resident inspector assigned to the 

plant.

Bower first joined the NRC in 1990 as a reactor engineer in the Region I 

Office. Most recently, he worked as the senior resident inspector at the Peach 

Bottom nuclear power plant in York County, Pa. In addition to his work as a 

region-based inspector, Bower has also been assigned as a resident inspector at the Salem nuclear 

power plant, located adjacent to Hope Creek, and at the Calvert Cliffs nuclear power plant in 

Calvert County, Md.

Prior to joining the NRC, Bower worked in progressively more responsible positions 

associated with the repair, modification and overhaul of naval ships and submarines at the Norfolk 

Naval Shipyard in Portsmouth, Va.

Bower is a graduate of Virginia Tech, where he earned a bachelor’s degree in mechanical 

engineering. He also holds a master’s degree in engineering management from Old Dominion 

University.

“Fred Bower’s extensive experience and commitment to safety will help the NRC ensure 

that Hope Creek conducts operations with the highest safety standards to protect the public health 

and safety,” NRC Region I Administrator William Dean said.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They serve as 

the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major work projects 

and interacting with plant workers and the public.

The Hope Creek resident inspectors can be reached at (856) 935-5373.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES link 

on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to 

NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region I 

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov 

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. I-11-030

Contact: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330

 Neil Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

August 31, 2011

Email: OPA1.RESOURCE@nrc.gov
Editorial Note on Part 922
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

§ 922.61 Prohibited or otherwise regulated activities. Except as may be permitted by the Director, the following activities are prohibited and thus are unlawful for any person to conduct or to cause to be conducted within the Sanctuary: ( a ) Anchoring in any manner, stopping, remaining, or drifting without power at any time;
( b ) Any type of subsurface salvage or recovery operation;
( c ) Diving of any type, whether by an individual or by a submersible;
( d ) Lowering below the surface of the water any grappling, suction, conveyor, dredging or wrecking device;
( e ) Detonating below the surface of the water any explosive or explosive mechanism;
( f ) Drilling or coring the seabed;
( g ) Lowering, laying, positioning or raising any type of seabed cable or cable-laying device;
( h ) Trawling; or
( i ) Discharging waster material into the water in violation of any Federal statute or regulation.
#### § 1033.2 Display of control numbers.

The following rules enforced by the Consumer Product Safety Commission containing collections of information are listed with the control numbers assigned by the Office of Management and Budget:

| Part or section of title 16 Code of Federal Regulations | Currently assigned OMB control No. |
| --- | --- |
| Part 1019 | 3041-0003 |
| Part 1204 | 3041-0006 |
| Part 1509 | 3041-0012 |
| Part 1508 | 3041-0013 |
| Part 1632 | 3041-0014 |
| Part 1210 | 3041-0016 |
| Part 1630, 1631 | 3041-0017 |
| Sections 1500.18(a)(6), 1500.86(a)(4) | 3041-0019 |
| Part 1209 | 3041-0022 |
| Parts 1610, 1611 | 3041-0024 |
| Parts 1615, 1616 | 3041-0027 |
| Part 1505 | 3041-0035 |
| Part 1406 | 3041-0040 |
| Part 1205 | 3041-0091 |
| Part 1211 | 3041-0125 |

(44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(1); 5 U.S.C. 553)

[62 FR 42397, Aug. 7, 1997]
**
**Exhibit 13.2**

**Certification by the Principal Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of AMTD International Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-Ffor the year ended December 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Cliff Kin Wang Li, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and 

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: April 30, 2020 

 
By: 
  /s/ Cliff Kin Wang Li
   Name: Cliff Kin Wang Li   Title: Chief Financial Officer**
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6207** 

DEBORAH V. HUBBARD, a/k/a Deborah Videtto Hubbard, a/k/a Deborah Hubbard

- Sarvis , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
WILLIAM BYARS, JR.; JUDY ANDERSON; T. TYLER; D. FOULK, a/k/a Officer Foulks; SADI RAFI , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Anderson

. Bruce H. Hendricks , District Judge. ( 8:14

- cv
- 00033

- BHH )

Submitted : June 25, 2015 Decided: June 30, 2015

Before GREGORY, FLOYD , and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Deborah V. Hubbard , Appellant Pro Se. James E. Parham, Jr. , Irmo, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Deborah V. Hubbard appeals the district court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on h er 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (20 12 ) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Hubbard v. Byars ,
No. 8:14

- cv
- 00033

- BHH (D.S.C. Jan. 26, 2015). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in t he materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 930.2 Public participation.

State management programs shall provide an opportunity for public participation in the State agency's review of a Federal agency's consistency determination or an applicant's or person's consistency certification.
Exhibit 23.5

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements:

|  | (1) |  | Registration Statement (Form S-3 Nos. 333-118503, 333-130515, 333-132684, 333-139304, 333-149744, 333-163781 and 333-165853) of Endeavour International Corporation and in the related Prospectuses, |
|--|-----|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) |  | Registration Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-186274) of Endeavour International Corporation and in the related Prospectuses, and |
|--|-----|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (3) |  | Registration Statement (Form S-8 Nos. 333-119577, 333-128692, 333-143794, 333-149743, 333-157967, 333-169851, 333-171392, 333-183250 and 333-183251) of Endeavour International Corporation and in the related Prospectuses; |
|--|-----|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

of our reports dated March 17, 2014, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Endeavour International Corporation and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Endeavour International Corporation, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2013.

 

/s/  Ernst & Young LLP

 

Houston, Texas 

March 17, 2014

----
No. I-13-027 July 29, 2013 

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330 E-mail: opa1.resource@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331

NRC Staff to Meet with Constellation on Aug. 5 in Baltimore

To Discuss Performance of Company’s Nuclear Plant Fleet

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with senior management from Constellation 

Energy Nuclear Group, LLC, on Monday, Aug. 5, to discuss topics related to the performance of the 

company’s nuclear power plants. Constellation operates a fleet of nuclear power plants, including 

Calvert Cliffs, in Lusby (Calvert County), Md.; Ginna, in Ontario (Wayne County), N.Y.; and Nine Mile 

Point, in Scriba (Oswego County), N.Y.

The purpose of this meeting, which will be open to the public, is for Constellation to brief

the NRC on activities and licensing actions involving its plants. It is scheduled to begin at 8 a.m. at the 

Royal Sonesta Harbor Court Hotel, at 550 Light St. in Baltimore. The session will take place in the 

hotel’s Guilford Room.

“We welcome the opportunity to hear from the company during this meeting about developments 

and issues – some of which are common in nature – affecting all of its plants. This maximizes our 

resources, as well as theirs,” NRC Region I Administrator Bill Dean said.

This will be what is known as an NRC Category 1 meeting. That is, it will be a session

with one company to discuss particular regulatory issues regarding specific facilities. Following

the business portion of the meeting, members of the public will have an opportunity to discuss

with NRC staff Constellation’s performance and the role of the NRC in ensuring safe plant

operation.

A portion of the meeting involving security issues will be closed to public observation.

The agenda for the meeting is available on the NRC’s website.
### Part A—General Emergency Authorities
§ 700.60 General provisions. ( a ) The Department of Commerce may, from time-to-time, take specific official actions to implement or enforce the provisions of this part.
( b ) Some of these official actions (rating authorizations and letters of understanding) are discussed in this subpart. Official actions that pertain to compliance (administrative subpoenas, demands for information, and inspection authorizations) are discussed in § 700.71(c). Directives are discussed in § 700.62.
[79 FR 47569, Aug. 14, 2014]
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 34 ) ll-K - (B ) -2 2 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:49 AM Sheet 34 of 325P. 2 

# 9 M 

# - 0
II-K-(B)-2 2 HIGHLIGHT S O F TH E JANUARY7 MEETIN GO F TH E INFORMA L ANALYSI S WORKINGGROU P O N TH E INDUSTRIAL BOILE RNSPS . Lette r fro

m R.L . Short , EPArEAB , t o Informa l Analysi s Workin g Group . Januar y 17 , 1980 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUND I

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(B)-2 2
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of DirectorsAvistar Communications Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements (Nos. 333-115755, 333-43944 and 333-63914)on Form S-8 of Avistar Communications Corporation of our reportdated March 16, 2006, except for the second paragraph of Note 13, asto which the date is April 18, 2006 with respect to the consolidatedbalance sheet of Avistar Communications Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31,2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’equity (deficit), and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2005, andthe related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31,2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Avistar CommunicationsCorporation.
|                       | /s/ Burr, Pilger & Mayer LLP |
|-----------------------|---------------------------------------|
| Palo Alto, California |
| April 26, 2006   |

 

----
StormKlear EPA Case Study

Project: RC Edwards Middle School

Central, SC

Owner: Pickens County School District, SC

Contractor: Raby Construction, Greenville, SC

Product: StormKlear DPS Segmented Socks

Dose Rate: 2.5 mg/L

Description: Approximately 35,000 square feet of additions and 80,000 square feet of renovations w

made to the existing RC Edwards Middle School located in Central, SC adjacent to Hartwell Lake off o

Highway 123 near Clemson University. Because of the clay soils and volume of rain, turbid water cou

potentially bypass the standard BMP’s installed. As a result, a StormKlear DPS dewatering system us

Segmented Geosynthetic Socks was deployed.  The Socks were installed in a 6” dual chambered sch

40 PVC manifold. The DBP‐2100 Sock was installed in the first chamber, and the GelFloc Sock in the

second; the discharge hose was then routed to a 15’ x 10’ TerraTex N08 filterbag.

Results – Influent: 687 NTU, Filterbag Discharge: 32 NTU

Residual Biopolymer Test: Negative
#### § 1000.17 Office of Equal Employment Opportunity and Minority Enterprise.

The Office of Equal Employment Opportunity and Minority Enterprise is responsible for assuring compliance with all laws and regulations relating to equal employment opportunity. The Office provides advice and assistance to the Chairman and Commission staff on all EEO related issues including the agency Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization Program. The Office develops agency EEO program policies. The Office manages the discrimination complaint process, including the adjudication of discrimination complaints, and facilitates Affirmative Employment Program (AEP) planning for women, minorities, individuals with disabilities and disabled veterans. The Office plans and executes special emphasis programs and special programs with minority colleges, and EEO, diversity, prevention of sexual harassment and related training. The Office identifies trends, personnel policies and practices that have an impact on EEO and makes recommendations to the Chairman on the effectiveness and efficiency of EEO programs and methods to enhance equal opportunity.
###### Editorial Note on Part 8b

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 8b appear at 68 FR 51353, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 8b.9 Administrative requirements for small recipients.

The Secretary may require small recipients to comply with §§ 8b.7 and 8b.8, in whole or in part, when the Secretary finds a violation of this part or finds that such compliance will not significantly impair the ability of the small recipient to provide benefits or services.
### Part B—Ozone Protection
### §12103. Additional definitions

As used in this chapter:

#### (1) Auxiliary aids and services

The term "auxiliary aids and services" includes—

(A) qualified interpreters or other effective methods of making aurally delivered materials available to individuals with hearing impairments;

(B) qualified readers, taped texts, or other effective methods of making visually delivered materials available to individuals with visual impairments;

(C) acquisition or modification of equipment or devices; and

(D) other similar services and actions.

#### (2) State

The term "State" means each of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the Virgin Islands of the United States, the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.".

(Pub. L. 101–336, §4, as added Pub. L. 110–325, §4(b), Sept. 25, 2008, 122 Stat. 3556.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 101–336, July 26, 1990, 104 Stat. 327, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 12101 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 2009, see section 8 of Pub. L. 110–325, set out as an Effective Date of 2008 Amendment note under section 705 of Title 29, Labor.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Termination of Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands

For termination of Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, see note set out preceding section 1681 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.
^^^^13 5^^ e>^ U^^-^i^ ^ 

Appendix B 

ANNUAL COMPENSATION PROJECTION 

FOR ESSENTIAL AIR SERVICE AT 

CHATHAM AND FUNTER BAY, ALASKA 

For the Two Year Period Beginning October 1, 2010 

Block Hours: (See Note A) 

Revenue Estimates 

Passengers FNR 

Passengers CYM 

Cargo (pounds) FNR 

Cargo (pounds) CYM 

Total Revenue 

Direct Expense 

Mail Sorting: 312 days @ 2 1/2 minutes day 

Pilot (Including Benefits & WC Ins) 

Fuel & Oil 

Insurance (Aircraft & Liability) 

Maintenance 

Depreciation 

Total Direct Expenses 

Indirect Expense 

Hangar 

Overhead 

Total Indirect Expenses 

Total Operating Expenses (TOE) 

Return at 10% of TOE 

Total Economic Cost 

Annual Subsidy for 100% Completion 

^ 

56 

10 

0 

639 

Hours 

13 

38 

38 

38 

38 

38 

38 

38 

Fare/Rate 

$77.00 

155.00 

0.20 

0.40 

Rate per 

Hour 

50.00 

134.30 

112.05 

64.22 

93.86 

17.41 

76.16 

99.77 

Totals '4 

$4,312 3:^ 

1,550 5? 

0 

256 

6,118 

Totals 

650 

5,103 

4,258 

2,440 

3,567 

662 

16.680 

2,894 

• 3,791 

6.685 

647.76 23,365 

10% 

Trips 

per Yr 

12 

40 

U 

64.78 

112,54 

Hours 

per Trip 

1.5 

0.5 

2.337 

25.702 

$19,584 

Block 

Hours 

18 

20 

M 

Note A. 

Block Hour Calculation 

JNU-FNR-CYM-JNU 

JNU-FNR-JNU 

Total Annual Block Hours 

Aircraft: DeHavilland Beaver DHC-2, Cessna 206 or Cessna 185. 

2010 USDOTMail Contract Appendix B 2010-06-09 Page 1 of 1
#### Frank Quintana, Appellant, v. American Export Lines, Inc., Respondent.

*662In our opinion, the action should not have been deferred for more than three years. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
Issue Date: 01/23/14 1 14-003 

 NRC INSPECTION MANUAL DIRS 

Change Notice 14-003

 

 DELETED: TRANSMITTED: 

 Number Date Number Date

1. IP 88020 09/05/06 IP 88020 01/23/14 

2. IP 88025 09/25/06 IP 88025 01/23/14 

3. IP 88055 08/19/08 IP 88055 01/23/14 

4. IP 88135.02 01/23/14 

TRAINING: No 

REMARKS: IP 88020, “Operational Safety,” has been revised significantly to add details 

regarding the inspection of the licensee’s ISA, specifically focused on performing 

a cradle-to-grave type inspection. The IP revision added details and examples 

for the inspector to verify the licensee’s accident sequences and IROFS are 

adequate to meet the performance requirements and aligned with the licensee’s 

methodology. The proposed revision also clarifies NRC internal communication 

and coordination exceptions regarding ISA or ISA-summary related issues. 

There were no changes in the recommended inspection hours or frequency from 

the current program. 

 IP 88025, “Maintenance and Surveillance of Safety Controls,” has been revised 

with significant reformatting. This revision now includes an additional review of 

training, organizational structure, and audits. The increased content should 

provide a more complete and thorough inspection of the maintenance 

organization. In order to account for the additional content, the estimated 

inspection hours for the implementation of the revised inspection procedure was 

increased to 30 hours of direct inspection effort, from 24 hours, in the Resource 

Estimate section. 

 IP 88055, “Fire Protection (Annual),” has been significantly revised to update the 

format according to new IMC0040 standards. Redundant information between 

the requirements and the guidance sections has been removed to increase 

efficiency. Minor grammar edits have been completed. Additional information 

regarding the PI&R section has been added from IP 88005. Additional training 

information has been added from IP 88010. 

 IP 88135.02, “Plant Status,” is a new document, based on an entire revision of 

 IP 88135. 

DISTRIBUTION: Standard for IP 88020, 88025, 88055 

DISTRIBUTION: IP 88135.02 has been designated as containing “Official Use Only – SecurityRelated Information,” and is therefore not available to the public. For 

information on this IP, please contact Kurt Cozens at 301-287-9061. 

END
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3046119-JAN-201211:16 AM