alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TP 7245E

1 of 1 

AD Number: CF-2016-01

EMERGENCY

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is issued pursuant to Canadian Aviation Regulation (CAR) 521.427. 

No person shall conduct a take-off or permit a take-off to be conducted in an aircraft that is in their legal 

custody and control, unless the requirements of CAR 605.84 pertaining to ADs are met. Standard 625 - 

Aircraft Equipment and Maintenance Standards Appendix H provides information concerning alternative 

means of compliance (AMOC) to ADs.

Number:

CF-2016-01

ATA:

64

Effective Date:

19 January 2016 

Type Certificate:

H-107

Subject: 

Tail Rotor – Pitch Link Corrosion

Applicability:

Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limited (BHTC) model 429 helicopters, serial numbers 57001 and 

subsequent

Compliance:

As indicated below, unless already accomplished.

Background:

A model 429 helicopter experienced an in-flight failure of a tail rotor pitch link, resulting in noticeable 

vibration and difficulty controlling the helicopter. A safe landing was completed with no injuries; however 

there was collateral damage to the tail rotor system in addition to the failed pitch link.

Investigation revealed that the pitch link had fractured. A crack had initiated at a corrosion pit located 

between the roll staked lip of the part number (P/N) 429-312-107-103 bearing and the beveled edge of 

the P/N 429-012-112-103 tail rotor pitch link. Further investigation revealed deficiencies in the application 

of corrosion resistant finishes to the pitch link during the manufacturing process.

Undetected corrosion of the pitch link could lead to pitch link failure, resulting in loss of controllability of 

the helicopter. 

Corrective Actions:

1. Within 10 hours air time from the effective date of this AD: 

a. Inspect the tail rotor pitch link in accordance with Part I of BHTC Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) 

429-15-26, dated 7 December 2015, or later revision approved by the Chief, Continuing 

Airworthiness, Transport Canada.

b. Replace any pitch links found corroded during the inspection.

c. Modify pitch links found to be free of corrosion in accordance with Part I of the ASB noted 

above. Modification involves cleaning, application of corrosion preventative sealant and 

re-identification.

2. Subsequently, at intervals not exceeding 50 hours air time, inspect the tail rotor pitch links for the 

condition of applied sealant and reapply as applicable in accordance with Part II of the ASB 

noted above. 

Authorization:

For the Minister of Transport, 

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY

Rémy Knoerr

Chief, Continuing Airworthiness

Issued on 5 January 2016 

Contact:

Ross McGowan, Continuing Airworthiness, Ottawa, telephone 1-888-663-3639, facsimile 613-996-9178 

or e-mail AD-CN@tc.gc.ca or any Transport Canada Centre.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________
No. 96-40821 Summary Calendar

_____________________

ROBERT MEADOWS Plaintiffs-Appellant,

versus

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; ANDY COLLINS; JAMES A COLLINS, DIRECTOR, ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. G-94-CV-376

_________________________________________________________________ October 11, 1996 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, HIGGINBOTHAM and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *1 Redesignated § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) by § 804 of the Prison Litigation Reform Act,

Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996).

2 Douglass v. United States Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc); United States v. Calverley , 37 F.3d 160 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc).

2 Robert Meadows challenges the 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) 1 dismissal of his civil rights

action which contends that he was denied due process at two disciplinary hearings and

that his assignment to field duty violated the eighth amendment. Having considered

Meadows’ brief and reviewing the findings by the district court under the plain error
standard, 2 and noting no error of law, the judgment appealed is AFFIRMED.
Dismiss and Opinion Filed June 12, 2013 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01563-CV 

No. 05-12-01566-CV 

No. 05-12-01567-CV 

CONTINENTAL HERITAGE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant 

V. 

STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F11-42292-I, F11-42291-I, and F11-72467-I 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers, and Justice Lewis 

The Court has before it appellant’s May 16, 2013 motion to dismiss appeal. We GRANT

the motion and dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). 

 PER CURIAM 

121563F.P05 

 
 –2– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

CONTINENTAL HERITAGE 

INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant 

No. 05-12-01563-CV V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the Criminal District Court 

No. 2, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F11-42292I. 

Opinion delivered per curiam. Chief Justice 

Wright, Justice Lang-Miers and Justice 

Lewis sitting for the Court. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that appellee THE STATE OF TEXAS recover its costs of this appeal 

from appellant CONTINENTAL HERITAGE INSURANCE COMPANY. 

Judgment entered June 12, 2013 

 

/Carolyn Wright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

CONTINENTAL HERITAGE 

INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant 

No. 05-12-01566-CV V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the Criminal District Court 

No. 2, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F11-42291-I. 

Opinion delivered per curiam. Chief Justice 

Wright, Justice Lang-Miers and Justice 

Lewis sitting for the Court. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that appellee THE STATE OF TEXAS recover its costs of this appeal 

from appellant CONTINENTAL HERITAGE INSURANCE COMPANY. 

Judgment entered June 12, 2013 

 

/Carolyn Wright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –4– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

CONTINENTAL HERITAGE 

INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant 

No. 05-12-01567-CV V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the Criminal District Court 

No. 2, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F11-72467-I. 

Opinion delivered per curiam. Chief Justice 

Wright, Justice Lang-Miers and Justice 

Lewis sitting for the Court. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that appellee THE STATE OF TEXAS recover its costs of this appeal 

from appellant CONTINENTAL HERITAGE INSURANCE COMPANY. 

Judgment entered June 12, 2013 

/Carolyn Wright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE
### §§11441 to 11447. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–220, title I, §199(a)(5), Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1059

Section 11441, Pub. L. 100–77, title VII, §731, July 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 528, authorized demonstration program for homeless individuals.

Section 11442, Pub. L. 100–77, title VII, §732, July 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 528, related to State coordination with demonstration grant recipients.

Section 11443, Pub. L. 100–77, title VII, §733, July 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 529; Pub. L. 101–645, title VI, §621(a), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4743, related to application for grants.

Section 11444, Pub. L. 100–77, title VII, §734, July 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 529, related to authorized activities.

Section 11445, Pub. L. 100–77, title VII, §735, July 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 529, related to payments, Federal share, and limitations.

Section 11446, Pub. L. 100–77, title VII, §736, July 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 530, related to evaluation of projects.

Section 11447, Pub. L. 100–77, title VII, §737, July 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 530; Pub. L. 100–628, title VII, §703(a), Nov. 7, 1988, 102 Stat. 3246, defined terms.
§ 1018.17 Appointments. ( a ) The Chairman shall appoint as members to advisory committees those persons selected by the Commissioners.
( b ) The term of appointment to an advisory committee shall be for two years, unless otherwise specified by the Commission. To promote maximum participation, an advisory committee member may serve for only one consecutive full term. This subsection shall not be deemed to affect the term of appointment of any present member of an advisory committee in effect on the original effective date of this part, September 24, 1975.
( c ) A vacancy that occurs during the term of an appointment normally will be filled by the Commission from the applications or nominations on file. Appointment to any such vacancy will be for the unexpired portion of the original appointment. Appointees to such an unexpired term may be reappointed for a full two-year term.
( d ) Notwithstanding paragraphs (b) and (c) above, members of the Toxicological Advisory Board shall be appointed for terms of three years. Members may be reappointed for a subsequent three-year term. Any vacancy on the Board shall be filled in the same manner in which the original appointment was made. Any person appointed to fill a vacancy occurring before the expiration of the term for which his or her predecessor was appointed shall serve only for the remainder of such term.
[41 FR 45882, Oct. 18, 1976, as amended at 43 FR 60876, Dec. 29, 1978]
### SUBCHAPTER III—PRIVACY
§ 719.20 Record for decision. ( a ) *The record.* The transcript of hearings, exhibits, rulings, orders, all papers and requests filed in the proceedings, and, for purposes of any appeal under § 719.18 or under 22 CFR 103.8, the decision of the ALJ and such submissions as are provided for under § 719.18 or 22 CFR 103.8 will constitute the record and the exclusive basis for decision. When a case is settled, the record will consist of any and all of the foregoing, as well as the NOVA or draft NOVA, settlement agreement, and order.
( b ) *Restricted access.* On the ALJ's own motion, or on the motion of any party, the ALJ may direct that there be a restricted access portion of the record for any material in the record to which public access is restricted by law or by the terms of a protective order entered in the proceedings. A party seeking to restrict access to any portion of the record is responsible, prior to the close of the proceeding, for submitting a version of the document(s) proposed for public availability that reflects the requested deletion. The restricted access portion of the record will be placed in a separate file and the file will be clearly marked to avoid improper disclosure and to identify it as a portion of the official record in the proceedings. The ALJ may act at any time to permit material that becomes declassified or unrestricted through passage of time to be transferred to the unrestricted access portion of the record.
( c ) *Availability of documents* — ( 1 ) *Scope.* All NOVAs and draft NOVAs, answers, settlement agreements, decisions and orders disposing of a case will be displayed on the BIS Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Web site, at *http://www.bis.doc.gov/foia ,* which is maintained by the Office of Administration, Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce. This office does not maintain a separate inspection facility. The complete record for decision, as defined in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section will be made available on request.
( 2 ) *Timing.* The record for decision will be available only after the final administrative disposition of a case. Parties may seek to restrict access to any portion of the record under paragraph (b) of this section.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 228 (Monday, November 29, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 69391]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26206]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--ACORD Corporation

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 20, 2004, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), ACORD Corporation 
(``ACORD'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the 
name and principal place of business of the standards development 
organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development 
activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: ACORD 
Corporation, Pearl River, NY. The nature and scope of ACORD's standards 
development activities are: To improve efficiency in insurance and 
reinsurance transactions by: (1) Providing a common framework for the 
interchange of information; (2) speeding up communication of data; (3) 
reducing processing costs and paperwork; and (4) improving accuracy and 
facilitating e-commerce.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-26206 Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
### SUBCHAPTER II—ASSISTED HOUSING FOR INDIANS AND ALASKA NATIVES
§ 904.105 Payment of final civil penalty. ( a ) Respondent must make full payment of the civil penalty within 30 days of the date upon which the NOVA becomes effective as the final administrative decision and order of NOAA under § 904.104 or the date of the final administrative decision as provided in subpart C of this part, as directed by NOAA. Payment must be made in accordance with the bill and instructions provided by NOAA.
( b ) Upon any failure to pay the civil penalty assessed, NOAA may request the U.S. Department of Justice to recover the amount assessed in any appropriate district court of the United States, may act under § 904.106, or may commence any other lawful action.
[71 FR 12448, Mar. 10, 2006, as amended at 87 FR 38937, June 30, 2022]
### SUBCHAPTER I—UNITED STATES CENTRAL AUTHORITY
#### § 2017.5 Expiration.

The Trade Preferences Extension Act of 2015 extended the AGOA until September 30, 2025 (Pub. L. 114-27, sec. 103, 129 Stat. 364). Accordingly, this part will expire on that date unless extended by statute.
No: II-13-055 August 28, 2013

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416 

NRC Assigns Senior Resident Inspector to Nuclear Fuel Services In Erwin, Tenn. 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Atlanta have named 

Charles Stancil Jr. as the senior resident inspector at the Nuclear Fuel 

Services fuel facility in Erwin, Tenn.

Stancil joined the NRC in 2004 as a reactor engineer in the agency’s 

Region IV office in Arlington, Tex. He transferred to the Region II office in 

Atlanta and served as resident inspector for more than seven years at the 

Browns Ferry nuclear plant in Alabama. 

Before joining the NRC, Stancil served more than 12 years in the 

U. S. Navy and achieved the qualification of Engineering Officer on nuclear 

submarines. After leaving the Navy, he spent 20 years in the commercial nuclear industry where he 

worked in licensing, procurement engineering, operations and earned his senior reactor operator 

license. 

Stancil received a bachelor of science degree in ocean engineering from the U. S. Naval 

Academy.

“Charlie Stancil is an experienced inspector committed to safety,” said NRC Region II 

Administrator Victor McCree. “He will work to carry out the NRC mission of protecting people and the 

environment by helping ensure the safe operation of Nuclear Fuel Services.”

NRC resident inspectors serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at some fuel fabrication facilities 

and all commercial nuclear power plants. They conduct inspections, monitor major work projects and 

interact with plant workers and the public. Resident inspectors can serve at one site for up to seven 

years.

The NRC resident inspector office at NFS can be reached by calling 423-735-0544.
### SUBCHAPTER XII–G—RESIDENTIAL SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT FOR STATE PRISONERS
Exhibit 99.1:


         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of VSB Bancorp,
Inc., (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Merton Corn, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Raffaele Branca, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.



/s/ Merton Corn
-------------------------------
Merton Corn
Chief Executive Officer
August 13, 2003



-------------------------------
/s/ Raffaele M. Branca
Raffaele M. Branca
Chief Financial Officer
August 13, 2003


This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       23
# Úradný vestník C 366A/30.

| | ISSN 1977-1037 |
| --- | --- |
| Úradný vestník
  Európskej únie | C 366A |
| | |
| Slovenské vydanie | Informácie a oznámenia | Ročník 6330. októbra 2020 |

ISSN 1977-1037

Úradný vestník

Európskej únie

C 366A

Slovenské vydanie

Informácie a oznámenia

Ročník 6330. októbra 2020

---

| Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- |
| | Korigendá |
| 2020/C 366 A/01 | Korigendum k oznámeniu o voľnom pracovnom mieste CONS/AD/162/20 ( Ú. v. EÚ C 358 A, 26.10.2020 ) | 1 |

Obsah

Strana

Korigendá

2020/C 366 A/01

Korigendum k oznámeniu o voľnom pracovnom mieste CONS/AD/162/20 ( Ú. v. EÚ C 358 A, 26.10.2020 )

( Ú. v. EÚ C 358 A, 26.10.2020 )

1

---

| SK | |
| --- | --- |

SK

---

Korigendá

| 30.10.2020 | SK | Úradný vestník Európskej únie | CA 366/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2020

SK

Úradný vestník Európskej únie

CA 366/1

---

Korigendum k oznámeniu o voľnom pracovnom mieste CONS/AD/162/20

(
  Úradný vestník C 358 A z 26. októbra 2020
  )

(2020/C 366 A/01)

Na strane 1 v časti „VŠEOBECNÉ INFORMÁCIE“, „Útvar“:

| Namiesto: | „GR RELEX: Zahraničné veci, rozširovanie a civilná ochrana“ |
| --- | --- |

Namiesto:

„GR RELEX: Zahraničné veci, rozširovanie a civilná ochrana“

| má byť: | „GR RELEX: Vonkajšie vzťahy“. |
| --- | --- |

má byť:

má byť:

„GR RELEX: Vonkajšie vzťahy“.

Na strane 1 v časti „Kto sme“ v druhom odseku:

| Namiesto: | „Generálne riaditeľstvo pre zahraničné veci, rozširovanie a civilnú ochranu (GR RELEX) v súčasnosti zahŕňa 2 riaditeľstvá: RELEX.1, ktoré sa zaoberá obchodom, rozvojom, bezpečnosťou a koordináciou, a RELEX.2, ktoré sa zaoberá rozširovaním, Blízkym východom a severnou Afrikou, ako aj civilnou ochranou.“ |
| --- | --- |

Namiesto:

Namiesto

„Generálne riaditeľstvo pre zahraničné veci, rozširovanie a civilnú ochranu (GR RELEX) v súčasnosti zahŕňa 2 riaditeľstvá: RELEX.1, ktoré sa zaoberá obchodom, rozvojom, bezpečnosťou a koordináciou, a RELEX.2, ktoré sa zaoberá rozširovaním, Blízkym východom a severnou Afrikou, ako aj civilnou ochranou.“

| má byť: | „Generálne riaditeľstvo pre vonkajšie vzťahy (GR RELEX) v súčasnosti zahŕňa 2 riaditeľstvá: RELEX.1, ktoré sa zaoberá obchodom, rozvojom a bezpečnosťou, a RELEX.2, ktoré sa zaoberá susedskou politikou a reakciou na krízy.“ |
| --- | --- |

má byť:

má byť

„Generálne riaditeľstvo pre vonkajšie vzťahy (GR RELEX) v súčasnosti zahŕňa 2 riaditeľstvá: RELEX.1, ktoré sa zaoberá obchodom, rozvojom a bezpečnosťou, a RELEX.2, ktoré sa zaoberá susedskou politikou a reakciou na krízy.“

---
exv10w3



 





Exhibit 10.3




Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy



The purpose of this Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy of EPIX Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the “Company”), is to provide a total compensation package that enables the
Company attract and retain, on a long-term basis, high caliber directors who are not employees or
officers of the Company or its subsidiaries.



In furtherance of this purpose, all non-employee directors shall be paid cash compensation for
services provided to the Company as set forth below:




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Board of Directors	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Annual retainer for Board membership:
	 	$	20,000	 
	 

	 	Additional retainer for Chairman:
	 	$	10,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Board Committees	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Annual retainer for Committee membership:
	 	$	10,000	 
	 

	 	Additional retainer for Audit Committee chair:
	 	$	7,500	 
	 

	 	Additional retainer for Compensation Committee and
Nominating and Governance Committee chairs	 	$	5,000	 






     The equity awards under the Director Compensation Arrangements will consist of initial and
annual awards of stock options. Initial awards of stock options to purchase 25,000 shares of
common stock will be granted upon election or re-election to the Board of Directors. These options
will vest in three equal annual installments such that they become fully-vested on the earlier of
(i) the third anniversary of the date of grant or (ii) the date of the Company’s third annual
meeting following the date of grant. Annual awards of 10,000 stock options will be granted to
directors during the years in which such director is not up for re-election to the Board of
Directors. These options will vest in full on the earlier of (i) the first anniversary date of the
grant or (ii) the date of the Company’s next annual meeting, in each case provided that the
optionee is still a director of the Company on such date. All options will be granted at fair
market value on the date of grant and will be granted on the date of our annual meeting of stockholders.