alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §17303. Fund for the payment of Government losses in shipment

(a) Establishment.—There is a revolving fund in the Treasury known as "the fund for the payment of Government losses in shipment".

(b) Use.—The fund shall be used for the replacement of valuables, or the value of valuables, lost, destroyed, or damaged while being shipped in accordance with regulations prescribed under section 17302 of this title.

(c) Unavailability.—The fund is not available with respect to any loss, destruction, or damage affecting valuables—

(1) that relates to property of the United States Postal Service that is chargeable to its officers or employees; or

(2) of which shipment shall have been made at the risk of persons other than the Federal Government and the executive departments, independent establishments, agencies, wholly owned Government corporations, officers and employees of the Government.

(d) Crediting of Recoveries and Repayments.—All recoveries and repayments on account of loss, destruction, or damage to valuables for which replacement is made out of the fund shall be credited to it and are available for the purposes of the fund.

(e) Appropriations.—Necessary amounts are appropriated for the fund.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1281.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 17303(a) | 40:722 (3d sentence words before 2d comma). | July 8, 1937, ch. 444, §2, 50 Stat. 479. |
| 17303(b) | 40:722 (1st sentence words after 5th comma). | |
| | 40:723 (2d sentence 2d proviso). | July 8, 1937, ch. 444, §3 (2d sentence 2d, last provisos, last sentence), 50 Stat. 480; Aug. 10, 1939, ch. 665, §1, 53 Stat. 1358; Pub. L. 91–375, §6(m)(4), Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 782. |
| 17303(c) | 40:723 (2d sentence last proviso). | |
| 17303(d) | 40:723 (last sentence). | |
| 17303(e) | 40:722 (1st sentence words before 5th comma, 2d sentence, 3d sentence words after 2d comma, last sentence). | |
| | 40:722a. | Pub. L. 103–329, title I (par. under heading "Payment of Government Losses in Shipment"), Sept. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 2387. |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "(hereinafter referred to as 'the fund')" are omitted as unnecessary.

In subsection (b), the text of 40:723 (2d sentence 2d proviso) is omitted as obsolete.

In subsection (e), the text of 40:722 (1st sentence words before 5th comma, 2d sentence, 3d sentence words after 2d comma, and last sentence) and the words "Beginning in fiscal year 1995 and thereafter" in 40:722a are omitted as obsolete. The words "for the fund" are substituted for "to make payments for the replacement of valuables, or the value thereof, lost, destroyed, or damaged in the course of shipments effected pursuant to section 721 of this title" for clarity and to eliminate unnecessary words.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-13-0112 - Consequence Study of a Beyond-Design-Basis Earthquake Affecting the Spent Fuel Pool for a U.S. Mark I Boiling Water Reactor

Accession Number: ML13256A334

Date Released: Tuesday, October 22, 2013

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML13256A339 - SECY-13-0112 - Consequence Study of a Beyond-Design-Basis Earthquake Affecting the Spent Fuel Pool for a U.S. Mark I Boiling Water Reactor (3 page(s), 10/9/2013)
    - ML13256A342 - SECY-13-0112 - Enclosure 1 - Consequence Study of a Beyond-Design-Basis Earthquake Affecting the Spent Fuel Pool for a U.S Mark I Boiling Water Reactor. (416 page(s), 10/9/2013)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION1350)

 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Beeston Enterprises Ltd, a Nevada corporation (the"Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2006, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Brian Smith,President/CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

 

***/s/ Bian Smith                               ***

Brian Smith, President, CEO, CFO

Dated:  August 10, 2006
§ 1.1 Policy. ( a ) Any person, partnership, or corporation may request advice from the Commission with respect to a course of action which the requesting party proposes to pursue. The Commission will consider such requests for advice and inform the requesting party of the Commission's views, where practicable, under the following circumstances. ( 1 ) The matter involves a substantial or novel question of fact or law and there is no clear Commission or court precedent; or
( 2 ) The subject matter of the request and consequent publication of Commission advice is of significant public interest.
( b ) The Commission has authorized its staff to consider all requests for advice and to render advice, where practicable, in those circumstances in which a Commission opinion would not be warranted. Hypothetical questions will not be answered, and a request for advice will ordinarily be considered inappropriate where: ( 1 ) The same or substantially the same course of action is under investigation or is or has been the subject of a current proceeding involving the Commission or another governmental agency, or
( 2 ) An informed opinion cannot be made or could be made only after extensive investigation, clinical study, testing, or collateral inquiry.
[44 FR 21624, Apr. 11, 1979; 44 FR 23515, Apr. 20, 1979, as amended at 54 FR 14072, Apr. 7, 1989]
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

UNITED PARKING, LLC
, a Florida limited liability

company, UNITED PARKING GROUP LLC, a Florida limited liability company, MARCEL PIERRE LE ROUX a/k/a/ MARCEL PIERRE LEROUX
, an individual,

and NIKOLAY LALOV
, an individual, Appellant s ,

v.

RAMIZ KHATIB and DEYAADDIN NATOUR, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Appellee s

.

No. 4D2024

- 0247

[ July 11, 2024 ]

Appeal of a nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Keathan B

. Frink , Judge; L.T. Case No.

CACE21006454

.

Vincent F

. Vaccarella and John A. Moore of Vincent F. Vaccarella, P.A.

, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant s

.

Samara Robbins Bober and Peter J. Bober of Bober & Bober, P.A., Hollywood, and Sam J. Smith and Loren B. Donnell of Burr & Smith, LLP, St. Petersburg for appellee s

.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

G ROSS

, D AMOORGIAN and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final unti l disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. II-13-022 April 21, 2013

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416

NRC EXITS MONITORING AND BEGINS ADDITIONAL INSPECTION 

FOR SECURITY INCIDENT AT WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II staff has returned to its normal mode 

after entering the monitoring mode of incident response following the security incident that 

occurred early this morning at the Watts Bar nuclear plant. The NRC had staffed its incident 

response center in the Region II office in Atlanta but deactivated continuous monitoring after the 

Tennessee Valley Authority, which operates the plant, determined that there was no further 

security condition or threat that would degrade the safety of the plant. The NRC continues to 

follow TVA’s action in its normal mode. 

TVA declared an unusual event, the lowest of the NRC’s four emergency classifications, 

shortly after 2 a.m. and notified the NRC that a plant security officer patrolling the TVA property 

near the Tennessee River was involved in an incident with gunfire. This location is outside the 

plant’s protected area. The officer was not injured and local law enforcement as well as the FBI 

are assisting in the investigation. 

TVA exited the unusual event at 12:30 p.m. after performing inspections of the protected 

area, conducting a helicopter survey of the plant and adjacent river area and inspecting the intake 

pumping station. The plant staff has notified the NRC that it will continue to maintain security at 

higher than normal levels. 

The NRC has dispatched two security inspectors from the Atlanta office to review the 

incident and the TVA response. 

The Watts Bar plant is located near Spring City, Tenn., about 60 miles southwest of 

Knoxville. Watts Bar Unit 1 is at 100 percent power and Unit 2 is under construction.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave. NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Benacquista Galleries, Inc. (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report"), I, James Price, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18

U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.





|/s/ James Price
-------------------
James Price
Chief Executive Officer
Duly Authorized Officer and Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer

Date: February 14, 2005
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
### SUBCHAPTER XI—CRIMINAL PENALTIES
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-13-0061 - Proposed Rule:  Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel (RIN 3150-AJ20)

Accession Number: ML13143A387

Date Released: Monday, June 24, 2013

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML13143A371 - SECY-13-0061 - Proposed Rule: Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel (RIN 3150-AJ20) (7 page(s), 6/7/2013)
    - ML13143A374 - SECY-13-0061 Enclosure 1: FRN - "Waste Confidence - Continued   Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel" (95 page(s), 6/7/2013)
    - ML13150A347 - SECY-13-0061- Enclosure 2:  "Waste Confidence Generic Environmental Impact Statement" (584 page(s), 6/7/2013)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
### subpart ii—block grants for substance use prevention, treatment, and recovery services

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 117–328, div. FF, title I, §1241(a)(2), Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5677, amended subpart heading generally. Prior to amendment, subpart heading read as follows: "Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse".
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: March 16, 2009
    
    /s/ Carl J. Grivner

Carl J. Grivner
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
### §11232. Repealed. Pub. L. 100–607, title I, §142(c)(1)(A), Nov. 4, 1988, 102 Stat. 3057

Section, Pub. L. 99–660, title IX, §932, Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3808, authorized appropriations for fiscal years 1988 through 1991 to carry out program of awards for research on Alzheimer's disease and related dementias.
### SUBCHAPTER III—TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AND INFORMATION SERVICES
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350








In connection with this Annual Report of Longwei Petroleum Investment Holding Limited (the “Company”) on the Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Toups, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Longwei Petroleum Investment Holding Limited.





Date: September 28, 2010








By: /s/  Michael Toups


___________________________




Michael Toups


Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
No: II-13-042 June 5, 2013

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416

NRC Increases Oversight of Sequoyah Nuclear Plant for Flood-Related Violations

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is increasing its oversight of the Sequoyah nuclear power 

plant after citing the plant for violations of requirements for analyzing and preparing for potential flooding.

The Sequoyah plant, operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority, is located on Chickamauga Lake 

about 16 miles northeast of Chattanooga. The lake is part of the Tennessee River system and TVA must 

account for potential flooding in the plant design and emergency procedures. No actual flooding event that 

would have affected the plant’s safety equipment has occurred.

The NRC staff held a conference with TVA officials in late April to discuss the risk significance of 

preliminary inspection findings in the flood protection area. 

After reviewing the NRC inspections and information presented by TVA at the conference, the NRC 

staff concluded that TVA did not establish adequate flood protection for the potential failure of upstream dams. 

The NRC staff has classified that violation as white, meaning it has low to moderate safety significance.

The NRC also found that TVA had not taken necessary measures to prevent water from entering the 

intake pumping station in the event of flooding. The NRC staff has also classified that violation as white.

The Sequoyah plant was also cited for a violation because TVA did not notify the NRC within eight 

hours after discovery that the potential failure of the upstream dams and subsequent potential onsite flooding 

resulted in an unanalyzed condition affecting plant safety.

“TVA has taken adequate compensatory measures at the Sequoyah plant to ensure that the flooding 

issues are not a current safety concern, but we want to be certain they appropriately address flooding scenarios 

that could affect important plant safety equipment on a more long-term basis,” said NRC Region II 

Administrator Victor McCree. 

The NRC will schedule an inspection to evaluate TVA’s corrective actions and TVA must respond in 

writing with their corrective actions for the reporting violation. 

The NRC also identified a similar violation for the potential upstream dam scenario and the reporting 

violation at TVA’s Watts Bar nuclear plant. The news release for the flooding issues at the Watts Bar plant can 

be found on the NRC website.
§ 1110.7 Who must certify and provide a certificate. ( a ) *Imports.* Except as otherwise provided in a specific standard, in the case of a product manufactured outside the United States, only the importer must certify in accordance with, and provide the certificate required by, CPSA section 14(a) as applicable, that the product or shipment in question complies with all applicable CPSA rules and all similar rules, bans, standards, and regulations applicable to the product or shipment under any other Act enforced by the Commission.
( b ) *Domestic products.* Except as otherwise provided in a specific standard, in the case of a product manufactured in the United States, only the manufacturer must certify in accordance with, and provide the certificate required by, CPSA section 14(a) as applicable, that the product or shipment in question complies with all applicable CPSA rules and all similar rules, bans, standards, and regulations applicable to the product or shipment under any other Act enforced by the Commission.
( c ) *Availability of certificates* — ( 1 ) *Imports.* In the case of imports, the certificate required by CPSA section 14(a) must be available to the Commission from the importer as soon as the product or shipment itself is available for inspection in the United States.
( 2 ) *Domestic products.* In the case of domestic products, the certificate required by CPSA section 14(a) must be available to the Commission from the manufacturer prior to introduction of the product or shipment in question into domestic commerce.
Description of revision to Director compensation arrangement



 EXHIBIT 10.4 
 DESCRIPTION OF REVISION TO DIRECTOR COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENT 
 Due to the
Company’s pending merger with an affiliate of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. (the “KKR Transaction”), on May 30, 2007, the Compensation and Benefits Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors of First
Data Corporation (the “Company”) determined that the normal equity compensation granted to non-employee directors in the first part of each year was not appropriate for 2007. As described in the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 17, 2007 (the “Proxy Statement”), the Company has the ability to make additional cash payments to directors to compensate the non-employee directors for the difference between
the intended value of equity awards and the value of awards that are granted. The Committee determined that, instead of granting the equity awards, the following cash compensation of equal value should be paid to non-employee directors within an
administratively reasonable period of time following the close of the KKR Transaction. 
 Annual and Committee Retainers 
 Each non-employee director will receive $90,000 plus any 2007 committee retainers payable, less appropriate withholding, instead of any
equity he or she would have received from the conversion of his or her cash retainer into stock options and/or unrestricted stock units as described on page 27 of the Company’s Proxy Statement. 
 Annual Grants of Non-Qualified Stock Options 
 Each non-employee director also will receive $125,000, less appropriate withholding, instead of receiving an annual grant valued at $125,000 in the form of immediately vested non-qualified stock options or unrestricted stock units as
described on page 28 of the Company’s Proxy Statement. 
 In addition, the three non-employee directors that were
re-elected at the 2007 Annual Shareholder Meeting on May 30, 2007, Mr. David Coulter, Mr. Richard Kiphart and Ms. Joan Spero, will receive $135,000 prorated at 1/36 per month (or partial month) from May 30, 2007 until
such time as the director terminates board service or the close KKR Transaction, which ever occurs earlier, less appropriate withholding, instead of receiving a grant valued at $135,000 in the form of immediately vested non-qualified stock options
or unrestricted stock units as described on page 28 of the Company’s Proxy Statement.
EXHIBIT 10.5


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO


TALX CORPORATION OUTSIDE DIRECTORS’ STOCK OPTION PLAN


On May 15, 2001, the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors reviewed and approved a
special stock option award to Outside Directors of 1,000 shares effective May
1, 2001 at the closing price of the stock on that date and an adjustment to the
annual award to 2,500 shares. The Board of Directors approved all
recommendations of the Compensation Committee on May 15, 2001.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the annual report of Sierra Wireless, Inc. (the “Corporation”)on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, David G. McLennan, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

 

 

Datedat Richmond, BC, Canada this March 26, 2008.

 

 
| /s/ DAVID G. MCLENNAN   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| David G. McLennan       |
| Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### The German-American Coffee Company, Respondent, v. John O’Neil, Appellant. (Action No. 2.)

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the opinion of Page, J., at' Special Term, in *German-*
      *914
      *American Coffee Co.*v. *Diehl, No. 2*(reported in 86 Misc. Rep. 547), with leave to defendant to withdraw demurrer and to answer on payment of costs in this court and in the court below. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.