alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 950.3 National Climatic Center (NCC). The National Climatic Center acquires, processes, archives, analyzes, and disseminates climatological data; develops analytical and descriptive products to meet user requirements; and provides facilities for the World Data Center-A (Meteorology). It is the collection center and custodian of all United States weather records, the largest of the EDIS centers, and the largest climatic center in the world. ( a ) Climatic data available from NCC include: ( 1 ) Hourly Surface Observations from Land Stations (ceiling, sky cover, visibility, precipitation or other weather phenomena, obstructions to vision, pressure, temperature, dew point, wind direction, wind speed, gustiness).
( 2 ) Three-Hourly and Six-Hourly Surface Observations from Land Stations, Ocean Weather Stations, and Moving Ships (variable data content).
( 3 ) Upper Air Observations (radiosondes, rawinsondes, rocketsondes, low-level soundings, pilot-balloon winds, aircraft reports).
( 4 ) Radar Observations (radar log sheets, radar scope photography).
( 5 ) Selected Maps and Charts (National Meteorological Center products).
( 6 ) Derived and Summary Data (grid points, computer tabulations, digital summary data).
( 7 ) Special Collections (Barbados Oceanographic and Meteorological Experiment meteorological data, Global Atmospheric Research Program basic data set, solar radiation data, many others).
( b ) Queries should be addressed to: National Climatic Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Asheville, NC 28801, tel. 704-258-2850, Ext. 683.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS UNDER 18 U.S.C. §1350



We, William R. Cruz and Ralph L. Cruz, Co-Chairmen of the Board and Co-Chief
Executive Officers of TradeStation Group, Inc., hereby certify, to our respective knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 10-K of TradeStation Group, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TradeStation
Group, Inc.



The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



|              |  |  |  |                               
|------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------
|March 8, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ William R. Cruz           
|Date          |  |  |  | William R. Cruz               
|              |  |  |  | Co-Chairman of the Board      
|              |  |  |  | and Co-Chief Executive Officer
|              |  | 
|March 8, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Ralph L. Cruz             
|Date          |  |  |  | Ralph L. Cruz                 
|              |  |  |  | Co-Chairman of the Board      
|              |  |  |  | and Co-Chief Executive Officer
### SUBCHAPTER XIV—HEALTH RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

          - 46 CFR Part 531
          - [Docket No. 04-12]
          - RIN 3072-AC30

# AGENCY:

Federal Maritime Commission.

# ACTION:

Proposed rulemaking; extension of time.

# SUMMARY:

The Commission by Notice of Proposed Rulemaking published November 3, 2004 (69 FR 63981) proposed an exemption from the tariff publication requirements of the Shipping Act of 1984 for service arrangements made by non-vessel-operating common carriers, subject to the conditional filing requirements set forth in this new Part. The Commission has received and determined to grant a request from the Department of Justice, for an extension of time to November 30, 2004 to file comments in this proceeding.

# DATES:

Comments are now due November 30, 2004. Submit an original and 15 copies of comments (paper), or e-mail comments as an attachment in WordPerfect 10, Microsoft Word 2003, or earlier versions of these applications.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Address all comments concerning this proposed rule to: Bryant L. VanBrakle, Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., Room 1046, Washington, DC 20573-0001; (202) 523-5725, e-mail:                         *Secretary@fmc.gov.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Amy W. Larson, General Counsel, Federal Maritime Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., Room 1018, Washington, DC 20573-0001; (202) 523-5740, e-mail:                         *GeneralCounsel@fmc.gov;*                         and Austin L. Schmitt, Director, Office of Operations, Federal Maritime Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., Room 1078, Washington, DC 20573-0001, (202) 523-0988.                    

Bryant L. VanBrakle,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 04-26125 Filed 11-24-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
### Part D—Health Care Quality Improvement

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior part D, consisting of sections 299c to 299c–7, was redesignated part E of this subchapter.
§ 231.205 Retention of records. ( a ) During the 10-year period beginning on the date of the Federal financial assistance award under 15 U.S.C. 4652 and for a period of seven years following any significant transaction involving the material expansion of semiconductor manufacturing capacity in a foreign country of concern, a covered entity or member of the affiliated group planning or engaging in any such significant transaction involving the material expansion of semiconductor manufacturing capacity in a foreign country of concern shall maintain records related to the significant transaction in a manner consistent with the recordkeeping practices used in their ordinary course of business for such transactions.
( b ) A covered entity that is notified that a transaction is being reviewed by the Secretary shall immediately take steps to retain all records relating to such transaction, including if those records are maintained by a member of the affiliated group or by related entities.
### §7264. Rules of practice and procedure

(a) The proceedings of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims shall be conducted in accordance with such rules of practice and procedure as the Court prescribes.

(b) The mailing of a pleading, decision, order, notice, or process in respect of proceedings before the Court shall be held sufficient service of such pleading, decision, order, notice, or process if it is properly addressed to the address furnished by the appellant on the notice of appeal filed under section 7266 of this title.

(c) Section 455 of title 28 shall apply to judges and proceedings of the Court.

(Added Pub. L. 100–687, div. A, title III, §301(a), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4116, §4064; renumbered §7264 and amended Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §402(b)(1), (d)(1), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 238, 239; Pub. L. 102–82, §4, Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 376; Pub. L. 105–368, title V, §512(a)(1), Nov. 11, 1998, 112 Stat. 3341.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1998—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 105–368 substituted "Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims" for "Court of Veterans Appeals".

1991—Pub. L. 102–40, §402(b)(1), renumbered section 4064 of this title as this section.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 102–40, §402(d)(1), substituted "7266" for "4066".

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 102–82 added subsec. (c).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1998 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 105–368 effective on first day of first month beginning more than 90 days after Nov. 11, 1998, see section 513 of Pub. L. 105–368, set out as a note under section 7251 of this title.

#### Interim Rules of Court of Veterans Appeals

Pub. L. 101–94, title II, §203, Aug. 16, 1989, 103 Stat. 627, provided that the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (28 U.S.C. App.) would be interim rules of United States Court of Veterans Appeals unless otherwise provided by the Court in accordance with this chapter, and if there was a conflict between a provision of Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and procedures set forth in this chapter, procedures set forth in this chapter would apply.
Zachary Jalbert

1223 Lattimore Drive

Clermont, FL 34711

Cell: 352-348-5409

Email: zackjalbert11@me.com

I, Zachary Jalbert, hereby submit this petition for exemption under Section 333; FAA 

Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Public Law 112-95 FEB. 14, 2012, Section 333.

I request this exemption in order to operate my UAV/UAS, Blade Chroma Quadcopter Aircraft, in 

order to provide services for profit to include aerial photography, aerial cinematography, 

aerial filming and photography for real estate, construction firms, aerial mapping, 

agriculture mapping, special events to include but not limited to weddings, private or public 

parties/events, business advertising, promotional events, geological surveying, and 

environmental studies.

The ability to provide these services to other local businesses and individuals in my 

community will benefit them by opening up opportunities they otherwise did not have before. 

Traditional methods of aerial photography/videography are simply not viable options for the 

average consumer as they are costly and involve greater risks to everyone involved; i.e. the 

use of larger aircraft carrying humans and flammable fuel. By utilizing the UAV/UAS the same 

results can be achieved with much safer conditions.

Prior to each flight/operation of the UAV/UAS, I will conduct a Pre-Flight Safety Inspection.

Only the manufacturers authorized repair facilities/ providers will perform any and all 

repairs. Flights will not take place over densely populated areas or private property without 

the owners permission. The UAV/UAS will only be operated within visual line of sight and will 

not be flown near airports or above 400 feet. The FAA can be confident that operations of this 

UAV/UAS will achieve at least the equivalent or greater level of safety.

The requests of this petition are similar to those of Mr. Todd Thomas Drone Pics, and Mr. Mike 

Lloyd & Associates, all of who have received Section 333 exemptions for comparable aircraft 

for similar operations.

The specific sections of 14 C.F.R from which I am seeking exemption are as follows:

14 C.F.R. Part 21;

14 C.F.R. 45.23(b);

14 C.F.R. 61.101(e)(4), & (5);

14 C.F.R. 61.113(a) & (b);

14 C.F.R. 61.133 (a);

14 C.F.R. 61.23(a) & (c);

14 C.F.R 91.7(a)

14 C.F.R. 91.9(b)(2);

14C.F.R. 91.109(a);

14 C.F.R. 91.119;

14 C.F.R. 91.121;

14 C.F.R. 91.151(a);

14 C.F.R. 91.203(a) & (b);

14 C.F.R. 91.405(a);

14 C.F.R. 91.407(a)(1);
14 C.F.R. 91.409(a)(2};

14 C.F.R. 91.417(a) & (b).

Please find the included User Manual of which I have reviewed for safe flight operations.

I truly thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Zachary Jalbert

http://www.horizonhobby.com/pdf/BLH8665-manual-EN.pdf
LOUIS W. GRAFFEO III AND 

JESSICA GRAFFEO,

Appellant,

v.

ELIZABETH BAUER A/K/A 

ELIZABETH MCDONALD,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-3765

_____________________________/

Opinion filed August 8, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.

Michael A. Flowers, Judge.

Michael H. Crew and Justin I. Remol of Crew & Crew, P.A., Fort Walton Beach, 

for Appellant.

Steven B. Bauman and Jeffrey L. Burns of Anchors Smith Grimsley, Fort Walton 

Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, C.J., BENTON, and MARSTILLER, JJ., CONCUR.
§ 998.26 Computation of service obligations for NOAA Corps and officer training and civilian training and advanced education. Service obligations incurred under § 998.24 and § 998.25(a) are computed as shown in this section, with the exception of fixed-period ADSOs as provided under § 998.24(a)(1) through (5). Officers may accumulate more than one ADSO from multiple obligating events. When an officer incurs an ADSO, compute the ADSO using the following rules: ( a ) For obligating events that require calculation: ( 1 ) For training greater than 60 days but equal to or fewer than 365 days: ( i ) *Step 1.* Count the number of calendar days of the course of instruction using the beginning and end dates of the course, including breaks, weekends, holidays, and summers, regardless of whether the officers attended classes during those periods.
( ii ) *Step 2.* Multiply the total found in Step 1 by three to get the total length of the ADSO in days.
( iii ) *Step 3.* Add the number of days found in Step 2 to the end date of the training to determine the date that the ADSO will expire.
( iv ) *Example.* An officer attends a semester-long civilian course of instruction that begins on January 1, 2021, and ends on May 30, 2021. ( A ) *Step 1.* January 1, 2021 to May 30, 2021 = 150 training days.
( B ) *Step 2.* 150 training days × 3 = 450 days, or 1 year, 85 days ADSO length.
( C ) *Step 3.* May 30, 2021 + 450 days = August 23, 2022 ADSO expiration.
( 2 ) For training greater than 365 days: ( i ) *Step 1.* The first 365 days of training automatically incur three years ADSO.
( ii ) *Step 2.* Count the number of additional training days from the 366th day to the end date of the course, including breaks, weekends, holidays, and summers, regardless of whether the officers attended classes during those periods.
( iii ) *Step 3.* Add the number of days found in Step 2 to three years to determine the total ADSO length.
( iv ) *Step 4.* Add the total ADSO length found in Step 3 to the end date of the training to determine the date that the ADSO will expire.
( v ) *Example.* An officer attends a full-time civilian postgraduate program that spans three academic years, beginning on September 1, 2021 and graduating on May 31, 2024. ( A ) *Step 1.* First year: September 1, 2021 to August 31, 2022 = 3 year ADSO.
( B ) *Step 2.* Additional training time: September 1, 2022 to May 31, 2024 = 639 days or 1 year, 274 days.
( C ) *Step 3.* 3-year ADSO + 639 days = 4 years, 274 days total ADSO length.
( D ) *Step 4.* May 31, 2024 + 4 years, 274 days = March 1, 2029 ADSO expiration.
( b ) The officer will ensure that supporting documents for each event are submitted to the NOAA Commissioned Personnel Center for review and verification for accurate calculation of their ADSO. The length of the ADSO shall be identified in the written agreement with the officer described in § 998.22(c).
### Part A—Individual and Group Market Reforms

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 111–148, title I, §1001(1), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 130, substituted "Individual and Group Market Reforms" for "Group Market Reforms" in part heading.
### Part I—Recommendation to States
Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation

For Nevada Profit Corporations

(Pursuant to NRS 78.385 and 78.390  After Issuance of Stock)





1.  Name of corporation:  BAS CONSULTING, INC.



2.  The articles have been amended as follows (provide article numbers, if available):



Article IV(a) is amended to read as follows:



The Corporation shall be authorized to issue the following shares:

Common  75,000,000 at par value $.001

Preferred  1,000,000 at par value $.001



3.  The vote by which the stockholders holding shares in the corporation entitling them to exercise at least a majority of the voting power, or such greater proportion of the voting power as may be required in the case of a vote by classes or series, or as may be required by the provisions of the articles of incorporation have voted in favor of the amendments is:  1  *



4.  Effective date of filing (optional):  ___________________________________________



5.  Officer Signature (required):  /s/ B. Alva Schoomer



* If any proposed amendment would alter or change any preference or any relative or other right given to any class or series of outstanding shares, then the amendment must be approved by the vote, in addition to the affirmative vote otherwise required, of the holders of shares representing a majority of the voting power of each class or series affected by the amendment regardless of limitations or restrictions on the voting power thereof.



IMPORTANT: Failure to include any of the above information and submit the proper fees may cause this filing to be rejected.



SUBMIT IN DUPLICATE





1





STATE OF NEVADA

OFFICE OF THE

SECRETARY OF STATE







Certified Copy



September 19, 2005



Job Number:

C20050919-0608

Reference Number:

Expedite:

Through Date:



The undersigned filing officer hereby certifies that the attached copies are true and exact copies of all requested statements and related subsequent documentation filed with the Secretary of States Office, Commercial Recordings Division listed on the attached report.





Document Number(s)

Description

Number of Pages

20050413530-83

Amendment

1 Pages/1 Copies







Respectfully,



/s/ Dean Heller

SEAL

DEAN HELLER

Secretary of State



By

/s/ C Norton



Certification Clerk









Commercial Recording Division

202 N. Carson Street

Carson City, Nevada 89701-4069

Telephone (775) 684-5708

Fax (775) 684-7138



2
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION
OF TREASURER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ariella Kapelner, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that:

(i)       
          The accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended
          September 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)       
          The information in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
          financial condition and results of operations of Tally-Ho Ventures, Inc. (the
          Company).

| |                                                 
| | ------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Ariella Kapelner 
Ariella Kapelner
Treasurer

Date: November 10, 2004

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                           by Chief Financial Officer

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of VSB Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Raffaele M. Branca, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 10, 2005

                                         /s/ RAFFAELE M. BRANCA
                                         ------------------------------------
                                         Raffaele M. Branca
                                         Executive Vice President and CFO


A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       26
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

March 11, 2005

Mr. Glenn M. Karisch

Barnes & Karisch, P.C.

2901-D Bee Caves Road

Austin, TX 78746

Honorable Guy S. Herman

Probate Court No 1

PO Box 1748

Austin, TX 78767-1748

Ms. Alice London

Watson Bishop London & Galow

106 East 6th Street, Suite 700

Austin, TX 78701

Mr. John B. Kyle

Kyle Mathis & Lucas, L.L.P.

8300 Douglas, Suite 700

Dallas, TX 75225

Mr. Jack W. London

Law Offices of Jack W. London & Associates , P.C.

106 E. 6th Street, Suite 700

Austin, TX 78701

RE:Case Number:  03-0867

Court of Appeals Number:  03-03-00233-CV

Trial Court Number:  77,916-A and B

Style:IN RE  WILSON N. JONES MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, RAMONA HENSON, R.N., AND SHELLY SELF, L.V.N.

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed per curiam opinion in the above-referenced cause.  The Motion for Temporary Order under Rule 29.3 is dismissed as moot.

Sincerely,

Andrew Weber, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosure

**Case No. 03-0867Page 2**
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Michael D. Durham, as President and Chief Executive Officer of ADA-ES, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) Amendment No. 1 to the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael D. Durham
|Name:                 |  | Michael D. Durham                    
|Title:                |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: October 19, 2012