alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 341 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 341

      To amend title 23, United States Code, to increase certain 
       infrastructure finance provisions, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 19, 2011

Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas introduced the following bill; which 
   was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To amend title 23, United States Code, to increase certain 
       infrastructure finance provisions, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Transportation Infrastructure 
Finance and Innovation Act of 2011'' or ``TIFIA of 2011''.

SEC. 2. SECURED LOANS.

    (a) Maximum Amount.--Section 603(b) of title 23, United States 
Code, is amended as follows:
            (1) in paragraph (2) by striking ``33'' and inserting 
        ``49''; and
            (2) in paragraph (6) by inserting after ``project 
        obligations'' the following: ``entered into after (not 
        including such obligations issued to refund prior project 
        obligations), or not contemplated by the parties at the time, 
        the agreement to provide the secured loan is entered into under 
        this section''.

SEC. 3. LINES OF CREDIT.

    Section 604(b) of title 23, United States Code, is amended as 
follows:
            (1) in paragraph (2) by striking ``33'' and inserting 
        ``49''; and
            (2) in paragraph (8) by inserting after ``project 
        obligations'' the following: ``entered into after (not 
        including such obligations issued to refund prior project 
        obligations), or not contemplated by the parties at the time, 
        the agreement to provide the line of credit is entered into 
        under this section''.

SEC. 4. FUNDING.

    Section 608(a) of title 23, United States Code, is amended as 
follows:
            (1) in paragraph (1) by striking ``each of fiscal years 
        2005 through 2009.'' and inserting ``fiscal year 2011 and 
        $285,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2012 through 2016.''; and
            (2) in paragraph (3) by striking ``each of fiscal years 
        2005 through 2009.'' and inserting ``fiscal year 2011 and 
        $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2012 through 2016.''
                                 <all>
```
§ 1.123 Change in notification to Bureau of the Fiscal Service. After the Commission sends the Fiscal Service notification of a debtor's liability for a debt, the Commission will promptly notify the Fiscal Service if the Commission: ( a ) Determines that there is a material error or other material change in the information contained in the notification, including in the amount of the debt, subject to any additional due process requirements, where applicable, under this subpart or the Federal Claims Collection Standards, if the amount of debt has increased;
( b ) Receives a payment or credits a payment to the account of the debtor named in the notification that reduces the amount of the debt referred to Fiscal Service for offset; or
( c ) Otherwise concludes that such notification is appropriate or necessary.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 15

- 00168

- CR

ERIC MOSQUEDA

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appelle e

From the 54th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- 1757

- C2

ORDER

Appellant’s Unopposed Motion to File Amended Brief for Appellant, filed on

December 7, 2015, is granted. Appellant’s amended brief is filed as of the date of its

receipt.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion granted

Order issued and filed December 17, 2015
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL**

**EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Bekem Metals, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Yermek Kudabayev, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Date:  August 14, 2008 | By: | /s/ Yermek Kudabayev |  
 

Yermek Kudabayev

 

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

  |
|------------------------|-----|----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
### subpart i—congregate nutrition services
T HE U NITED B UILDING , 77 W EST W ACKER D RIVE , C HICAGO , IL 60601 May 24, 2012

Mr. Paul L. Gretch Director Office of International Aviation Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Applications of Continental/ United /United Express and bmi Docket s DOT

- OST

- 2003

- 15758

, - 2005

- 22547,

- 2006

- 25733,

- 2006

- 23627,

- 2007

- 28500 and

- 2009

- 0174

Dear Mr. Gretch:

By Notice s of Action Taken in th e above docket s , 1 the Department granted Statements of Authorization and e xemptions authorizing reciprocal code

- share services by Continental/ United/United Express 2 and bmi

. Consistent with Department requirements

, Continental/ United/United Express and bmi notify the Department that they will terminate all code

- share services

, effective May 31 , 2012.

Sincerely,

Dan Weiss Don H. Hainbach Managing Director, International Garofalo, Goerlich, Hainbach PC and Regulatory Affairs F or BRITISH MIDLAND UNITED AIR LINES, INC. AND CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC.

cc: R obert Finamore Esta Rosenberg Mary Street

1 By Order 20 11

- 3

- 14, the Department reissued these authorities in the name of Continental, Continental Micronesia and Air Micronesia and/or United.
2 United is filing this notice on behalf of United Express carriers that hold a statement of authorization to code share with bmi: GoJet (Docket DOT

- OST

- 20 05

- 22547), SkyWest (Docket DOT

- OST

- 2006

- 23627), Mesa (Docket DOT

- OST

- 2006

- 25733) and Shuttle America (Docket DOT

- OST

- 2007

- 28500)

.T HE U NITED B UILDING , 77 W EST W ACKER D RIVE , C HICAGO , IL 60601 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have this date served a copy of the foregoing document on all

persons named below by causing a copy to be sent via email:

anita.mosner@hklaw.com agoerlich@ggh

- airlaw.com carl.nelson@aa.com charters@evergreenairlines.com dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil efarberman@wiley.rein.com howard.kass@usairways.com jhill@dowlohnes.com john.allen@faa.gov john.fredericksen@suncountry. com jrichardson@jonlrichardson.com kevin.montgomery@polairaircargo.com matwood@sherblackwell.com mcmillin@woa.com mroller@rollerbauer msinick@ssd.com nsparks@fedex.com pmurphy@lopmurphy.com rpommer@atlasair.com rsilverberg@sgbdc.com

s ascha.vanderbellen@delta.com slachter@lachter

- clements.com william.stallings@usdoj.gov

Annalei Avanceña Int ernational Regulatory A dvisor

May 24, 2012
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 06a0394p.06 

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

_________________ P AUL G REGORY H OUSE , Petitioner-Appellant, v. R ICKY B ELL , Warden, Respondent-Appellee. X - - - -> , - - N No. 00-6136
Filed: October 25, 2006

_________________ ORDER

_________________ This appeal is now before us on remand from the Supreme Court, House v. Bell , 126 S. Ct. 2064 (2006). In light of the Court’s opinion (and the Tennessee attorney general’s statement in respondent’s brief before the Supreme Court that unexhausted issues remain under Tenn. Code. Ann. § 40-30-117(a)(2)(4)), we ask that the parties submit letter briefs addressing whether remand to the courts of Tennessee is appropriate in order to allow petitioner to exhaust his state-court remedies on his actual innocence claim. Letter briefs shall be due within sixty days of this order and shall not exceed fifteen pages. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT /s/ Leonard Green

___________________________________ Clerk

1
### §6108. Authority for judicial orders of restitution

(a) Any Federal court, when sentencing a defendant convicted of an offense arising from the misuse of benefits under this title, may order, in addition to or in lieu of any other penalty authorized by law, that the defendant make restitution to the Department.

(b) Sections 3612, 3663, and 3664 of title 18 shall apply with respect to the issuance and enforcement of orders of restitution under subsection (a). In so applying those sections, the Department shall be considered the victim.

(c) If the court does not order restitution, or orders only partial restitution, under subsection (a), the court shall state on the record the reasons therefor.

(d) Amounts received in connection with misuse by a fiduciary of funds paid as benefits under laws administered by the Secretary shall be paid to the individual whose benefits were misused. If the Secretary has previously reissued the misused benefits, the amounts shall be treated in the same manner as overpayments recouped by the Secretary and shall be deposited to the credit of the applicable revolving fund, trust fund, or appropriation.

(Added Pub. L. 108–454, title V, §504(b)(1), Dec. 10, 2004, 118 Stat. 3621.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the first day of the seventh month beginning after Dec. 10, 2004, see section 507(a) of Pub. L. 108–454, set out as an Effective Date of 2004 Amendment note under section 5312 of this title.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Willard Abel and William Marchese, Appellants.

Memorandum: In view of the absence, in the records of these defendants, of any convictions other than trivial traffic infractions, we think the sentences of four months’ imprisonment were too severe and that the fines imposed, together with sentences to thirty days’ imprisonment will constitute ample punishment for the offenses to which they have entered pleas of guilty. All concur. (Appeals from judgments which sentenced defendants each to imprisonment for four months, with a fine of $500.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ.
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

_________________________

No. 06-12-00092-CR

______________________________

RONNY THOMAS TREVILION, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 196th Judicial District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court No. 27371

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Ronny Thomas Trevilion, appellant, has filed with this Court a motion to dismiss his 

appeal. The motion is signed by Trevilion and by his counsel in compliance with Rule 42.2(a) of 

the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). As authorized by Rule 

42.2, we grant the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

Bailey C. Moseley

Justice

Date Submitted: September 20, 2012

Date Decided: September 21, 2012

Do Not Publish
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

11 a.m., Friday, December 17, 2004.

# PLACE:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Surveillance Matters.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jean A. Webb, (202) 418-5100.

Catherine D. Daniels,

Assistant Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 04-25677  Filed 11-16-04; 10:29 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: In re Sarah Haden

Appellate case number: 01-19-00405-CV

Trial court case number: 2012-59856

Trial court: 311th District Court of Harris County

The en banc court has unanimously voted to deny relator’s motion for en banc 

reconsideration of the denial of relator’s request for temporary relief.*It is ordered that the motion 

for en banc reconsideration is denied.

Judge’s signature: /s/ ___Sarah B. Landau_______ 

 Acting for the En Banc Court

Date: June 11, 2019

* En banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Keyes, Higley, Lloyd, Kelly, 

Goodman, Landau, Hightower, and Countiss.
Skip header section

People Business Geography Newsroom Subjects A to Z Search@Census

## Current Construction Reports

**C21 - New Residential Construction in Selected MetropolitanAreas**

**C21 Series/Publication has been discontinued.**

Presents quarterly estimates for forty selected metropolitan areas(MA's) of the number of new, privately owned residential housing unitsauthorized by building permits, authorized but not yet started, started, underconstruction, and completed.  Annual totals and comparative data forearlier years are given also.  Tables include all such housing units and separate figures for one-family houses. An annual supplement provides statistics on sales of new one-family houses including the number sold, median and average sales prices, and median and average floor areas.

This publication is a joint report of the Bureau of the Census and theDepartment of Housing and Urban Development.

All documents are in PDF format.   [PDF] or  denotes a file in Adobe’s Portable Document Format. To view the file, you will need the Adobe® Reader® available free from Adobe.  This symbol  indicates a link to a non-government web site.  Our linking to these sites does not constitute an endorsement of any products, services or the information found on them. Once you link to another site you are subject to the policies of the new site.

| YEAR        | C21 -- New Residential Construction in Selected Metropolitan Areas |
|-------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Quarter 1   | Quarter 2                                                          | Quarter 3 | Quarter 4 |
| Quarter 1   | Quarter 2                                                          | Quarter 3 | Quarter 4 |
| Quarter 1   | Quarter 2                                                          | Quarter 3 | *Quarter 4* |
| *Quarter 1* | *Quarter 2*                                                        | *Quarter 3* | Quarter 4 |

Additional information on Construction Statistics

Source:  *U.S. Census Bureau*

Skip footer section

Privacy Policy 2010Census DataTools Information Quality Product Catalog Contact Us Home
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-52,412]

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers at Lear Corporation, SSD Division, Elsie, Michigan. The application contained no new substantial information which would bear importantly on the Department's determination. Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued. 

TA-W-52,412; Lear Corporation, SSD Division Elsie, Michigan (December 16, 2003)

Signed at Washington, DC this 27th day of January 2004.

Timothy Sullivan,

Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 04-2606 Filed 2-5-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Mortgagebrokers.com Holdings Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Alex Haditaghi, Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| 1.     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                             |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                              |
| 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany. |

 
| By:    | */s/*   *Alex Haditaghi*

ALEX HADITAGHIChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer
Dated: May 23, 2005

 

 

 

  |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
### Part B—Oil and Gas Demand Reduction and Substitution
#### In the Matter of the Application of Karl A. McCormick, Proctor of the Bar for the Eighth Judicial District.

Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ.
#### § 946.8 Review of proposed certification for restructuring.

The Responsible Meteorologist shall transmit the proposed certification and the accompanying documentation to the Regional Director for review. The Regional Director may amend or supplement the documentation provided subsequent readers can easily identify his or her amendments or supplements. If the Regional Director agrees with the proposed certification, he or she shall endorse the proposed certification, and transmit it along with all the accompanying documentation to the Secretary. A copy of any proposed certification shall be provided to the Committee upon request of the Committee.
§ 998.12 Selection of officer candidates. ( a ) The Secretary shall prescribe the number of applicants to be selected for officer candidates and the basic qualifications necessary to fulfill the needs of the NOAA Corps.
( b ) A personnel board convened pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 3022 shall review all qualified applicants and make recommendations for appointment to the Secretary and the President. Applicants shall be rated on collegiate record, work experience, references, the report of the interviewing officer, and all other available information.
( c ) Upon review of the recommendations of the personnel board, the Secretary shall make those temporary appointments in the grade of officer candidate as deemed appropriate. An original appointment of an officer candidate, upon graduation from the Basic Officer Training Class program of the NOAA Corps, may not be made in any other grade than ensign.
( d ) Officer candidates receiving appointments as ensigns upon graduation from the Basic Officer Training Class program shall take rank according to their proficiency as shown by the order of their merit at date of graduation.
### subpart 2—election assistance commission standards board and board of advisors
#### David G. Crofut, Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent. Anita M. Crofut, Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent.

(Motion No. 1889.) (Motion No. 1890.)

*682Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Bergan and Coon, JJ., concur; Brewster, J., dissents.
§ 970.510 Objections to terms, conditions and restrictions. ( a ) The licensee may file a notice of objection to any term, condition or restriction in the license. The licensee may object on the grounds that any term, condition or restriction is inconsistent with the Act or this part, or on any other grounds which may be raised under applicable provisions of law. If the licensee does not file notice of an objection within the 60-day period immediately following the licensee's receipt of the notice of issuance or transfer under § 970.509, he will be deemed conclusively to have accepted the terms, conditions and restrictions in the license.
( b ) Any notice of objection filed under paragraph (a) of this section must be in writing, must contain the precise legal basis for the objection, and must provide information relevant to any underlying factual issues deemed by the licensee as necessary to the Administrator's decision upon the objection.
( c ) Within 90 days after receipt of the notice of objection, the Administrator will act on the objection and publish in the Federal Register, as well as provide to the licensee, written notice of his decision.
( d ) If, after the Administrator takes final action on an objection, the licensee demonstrates that a dispute remains on a material issue of fact, the Administrator will provide for a formal hearing which will proceed in accordance with subpart I of 15 CFR part 971.
( e ) Any final determination by the Administrator on an objection to terms, conditions or restrictions in a license after the formal hearing provided in paragraph (d) of this section is subject to judicial review as provided in chapter 7 of title 5, United States Code.
[46 FR 45903, Sept. 15, 1981, as amended at 54 FR 548, Jan. 6, 1989]