alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. I-14-002 January 27, 2014

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331 

NRC Dispatches Special Inspection Team to Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has initiated a Special Inspection at the Calvert Cliffs 

nuclear power plant in Maryland. The inspection will further review an unplanned shutdown of both 

reactors at the site that occurred on Jan. 21.

Comprised of three members, the inspection team will begin its work today (Jan. 27) at the 

plant, which is located in Lusby, Md., and operated by Constellation Energy LLC. The review will 

evaluate what happened during the event, including the response by plant operators and safety systems. 

The inspection will also examine the event’s causes and any related issues. It will expand on initial 

assessments performed by two NRC inspectors, one of whom is the Senior Resident Inspector assigned 

to the facility on a full-time basis. The Senior Resident reported to the plant when the reactors shut 

down.

“We want to gain a better understanding of the chain of events that caused both of the reactors 

to simultaneously shut down and equipment anomalies subsequent to the plant trips,” said NRC Region 

I Administrator Bill Dean. “This inspection is designed to shed additional light on not only why the 

outages happened but how the plant operators handled them.”

Nuclear power plants not only send power out to the electrical grid, they also take a certain 

amount of power in for operational purposes. During a winter storm on Jan. 21, an electrical supply 

system that distributes some of this off-site power to the plant was temporarily interrupted. At this point 

it appears that snow and ice affected a ventilation louver filter, causing an electrical fault, or shortcircuit. Breakers tripped, or opened, as designed to clear the fault, shutting down the electrical supply 

system.

Subsequently, several electric-powered plant systems and components shut down, including 

motors for moving control rods and circulating-water pumps for Unit 2, triggering an automatic plant 

shutdown. The electricity loss also caused the Unit 1 main turbine control circuit to malfunction, which 

led to the automatic shutdown of Unit 1.

Both of the pressurized-water reactors were safely taken out of service following the power 

interruption, and there were no impacts on public health and safety.
EXHIBIT 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears
below constitutes and appoints J. Philip Hester, Sr., his Attorney-in-Fact, with
full power of substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, and in any
and all capacities, to sign this Form 10-KSB and any amendment thereto, and to
file the same, with exhibits thereto and such other documents in connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and hereby ratifies and
confirms all that said Attorney-in-Fact, or his substitute or substitutes, may
do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

     In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by
the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on
the dates indicated.



/s/ J. Philip Hester, Sr.                    /s/ Andrew M. Head
-------------------------                    ------------------
J. Philip Hester, Sr.                        Andrew M. Head
Chief Executive Officer, President and       Director
Director (principal executive officer)       March 29, 2007
March 29, 2007

/s/ Ralph Millard Bowen                      /s/ Bruce T. Howard
-----------------------                      -------------------
Ralph Millard Bowen                          Bruce T. Howard
Director                                     Director
March 29, 2007                               March 29, 2007

/s/ Marcus C. Byrd, Jr.                     /s/ David E. Johnson
-----------------------                     --------------------
Marcus C. Byrd, Jr.                         David E. Johnson
Director                                    Chairman of the Board of Directors
March 29, 2007                              March 29, 2007

/s/ Glennon C. Grogan                       /s/ William A. McRae
---------------------                       --------------------
Glennon C. Grogan                           William A. McRae
Director                                    Director
March 29, 2007                              March 29, 2007

/s/ James H. Grogan                         /s/ Kim M. Mills
-------------------                         ----------------
James H. Grogan                             Kim M. Mills
Secretary and Director                      Director
March 29, 2007                              March 29, 2007

/s/ Deborah F. McLeod
---------------------
Deborah F. McLeod
Chief Financial Officer (principal
accounting officer) and Executive
Vice President
March 29, 2007






<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
MediciNova, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Shintaro Asako, as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



Date: May 15, 2009By:

/s/    SHINTARO
ASAKOShintaro Asako Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and such certification is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### Division B—Elder Justice
### §12655. General authority

The Corporation may make grants to States or local applicants and may transfer funds to the Secretary of Agriculture or to the Secretary of the Interior for the creation or expansion of full-time, part-time, year-round, or summer, youth corps programs 1 To the extent practicable, the Corporation shall apply the provisions of division C in making grants under this section.

(Pub. L. 101–610, title I, §199A, formerly §121, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3140; Pub. L. 102–384, §5, Oct. 5, 1992, 106 Stat. 1455; renumbered §199A and amended Pub. L. 103–82, title I, §101(a), (e)(1), (2), Sept. 21, 1993, 107 Stat. 788, 815.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 12541 of this title prior to renumbering by Pub. L. 103–82, §101(a).

#### Amendments

1993—Pub. L. 103–82, §101(e)(1), (2), substituted "Corporation" for "Commission", substituted "or to the Secretary of the Interior" for ", to the Secretary of the Interior, or to the Director of ACTION", struck out "under section 12512 of this title" after "may make grants", and inserted at end "To the extent practicable, the Corporation shall apply the provisions of division C in making grants under this section."

1992—Pub. L. 102–384 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "The Commission may make grants under section 12512 of this title to States or local applicants, to the Secretary of Agriculture, to the Secretary of the Interior, or to the Director of ACTION for the creation or expansion of full-time or summer youth corps programs."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1993 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–82 effective Oct. 1, 1993, see section 123 of Pub. L. 103–82, set out as a note under section 1701 of Title 16, Conservation.

#### Short Title

For short title of subtitle I of title I of Pub. L. 101–610 which enacted this division, as the American Conservation and Youth Service Corps Act of 1990, see section 199 of Pub. L. 101–610, set out as a note under section 12501 of this title.

1 So in original. Probably should be followed by a period.
§ 1500.134 Policy on first aid labeling for saline emesis. ( a ) This section states the Consumer Product Safety Commission's policy concerning first aid instructions for the use of a salt solution to induce vomiting (saline emesis) in the event of ingestion of hazardous substances.
( b ) In many cases where hazardous substances are ingested, the recommended first aid instructions for inducing vomiting have contained a statement that this should be accomplished by drinking a solution of salt (sodium chloride) in warm water. At one time, this direction was considered medically acceptable. However, the Commission has obtained information showing that the instruction to perform saline emesis is no longer appropriate. This is because the use of salt to induce vomiting can cause severe hypernatremia (salt poisoning) with potentially toxic effects, particularly in children 5 years old or younger, the age group most often involved in accidental poisonings. In view of the availability of safer and more effective emetics such as ipecac syrup, the Commission no longer recommends a direction to perform saline emesis as a first aid direction for inducing vomiting.
( c ) The Commission believes that, for products for which directions for saline emesis have been given in the past, ipecac syrup, U.S.P., is the most appropriate emetic, unless a particular contraindication exists in connection with any particular hazardous substance.
( d ) The Commission wishes to emphasize that this policy does not require that any specific first aid instruction or wording be used. Where appropriate, the label may include directions ( 1 ) that the victim immediately contact a doctor or poison control center and/or
( 2 ) that vomiting be induced using methods other than salt. It is, of course, the manufacturer's responsibility to insure that the label provides enough information in addition to first aid instructions to fulfill all other labeling required by statute or regulation.
(Sec. 30(a), 86 Stat. 1231 (15 U.S.C. 2079(a)))
[43 FR 33704, Aug. 1, 1978]
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.3

              CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION

                                       OF

                                 EOTT Energy LLC

                         ------------------------------

                  EOTT Energy LLC (hereinafter called the "company"), a limited
liability company organized and existing under and by virtue of the Limited
Liability Company Act of the State of Delaware, does hereby certify:

                  1.       The name of the limited liability company is: EOTT
Energy LLC

                  2.       The certificate of formation of the company is hereby
amended by striking out Article 1. thereof and by substituting in lieu of said
Article the following new Article:

                           1.       The name of the limited liability company
is: Link Energy LLC

                  3.       This Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of
Formation shall be effective on October 1, 2003

Executed on this 15 day of August, 2003

/s/ Thomas M. Matthews
-------------------------
Thomas M. Matthews - Authorized Person
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 159 (Thursday, August 16, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 49409]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-20126]

========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 159 / Thursday, August 16, 2012 / 
Notices

[[Page 49409]]

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service

Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to the 
University of Mississippi of University, Mississippi, an exclusive 
license to U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 13/463,442, ``Anti-
Obesity Properties of Pterostilbene'', filed on May 3, 2012.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 17, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 
5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Rm. 4-1174, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: June Blalock of the Office of 
Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 
301-504-5989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Government's patent rights in 
this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as 
represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. The prospective exclusive 
license will be royalty-bearing and will comply with the terms and 
conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective exclusive 
license may be granted unless, within thirty (30) days from the date of 
this published Notice, the Agricultural Research Service receives 
written evidence and argument which establishes that the grant of the 
license would not be consistent with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 
and 37 CFR 404.7.

Richard J. Brenner,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2012-20126 Filed 8-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
```
#### DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. SCOTT.

No. 12005.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued June 7, 1954.

Decided July 1, 1954.

Messrs. Milton D. Korman and Hubert B. Pair, Asst. Corporation Counsel, Washington, D. C., for the District of Columbia, with whom Messrs. Vernon E. West, Corporation Counsel, Chester H. Gray, Principal Asst. Corporation Counsel, and Harry L. Walker, Asst. Corporation Counsel, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. Frank D. Reeves, Washington, D. C. , with whom Mr. Curtis P. Mitchell, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, FAHY and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this case the Municipal Court of Appeals reversed the conviction of appel-lee Scott, on the ground that he had been denied the effective assistance of counsel, and granted him a new trial. Scott v. District of Columbia, 1953, D.C.Mun. App., 99 A.2d 641.

 Each case of this sort must be judged on its own merits. The decision here certainly should not be taken as a holding that a defendant can escape justice merely by hiring a lawyer who represents, in another case, a witness against that defendant. It means that under all the circumstances of this case there was a failure of representation which deprived Scott of a fair trial. There is no suggestion that there was any chicanery on the part of the accused’s attorney, or scheme to thwart justice. The opinion of the Municipal Court of Appeals has our approval, and its decision will be

Affirmed.
(December 23, 1953.)

#### In the Matter of Stanwood United, Inc., Petitioner, against John F. O’Connell et al., Constituting the State Liquor Authority, Respondents.

Determination unanimously annulled, with $50 costs and disbursements to the petitioner, and the State Liquor Authority directed to forthwith restore the license certificate to the petitioner. Opinion by Cohn, J. Order filed. (Order of December 15, 1953, vacated.) Present — -Peek, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Bergan, JJ. [Also printed 283 App. Div. 79.]
###### Editorial Note on Part 922

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

###### Editorial Note on Subpart H of Part 922

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subpart H appear at 80 FR 34048, June 15, 2015.

#### § 922.85 Review of State permits and leases for certain aquaculture projects.

NOAA has described in a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with the State of California how the State will consult and coordinate with NOAA to review any new, amended or expanded lease or permit application for aquaculture projects in Tomales Bay involving introduced species.
Exhibit 32


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


<PAGE>

Exhibit 32


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Xpention  Genetics,  Inc.  (formerly
Bayview  Corporation  (the  "Company")  on Form  10-QSB/A  for the period  ended
November 30, 2005 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,  in the capacities and on the dates
indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that  to his
knowledge:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  April 19, 2006


/s/ David Kittrell
---------------------------------------
David Kittrell, CEO and CFO
### §721. Recoupment of bonuses or awards paid to employees of Department

(a) In General.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary may issue an order directing an employee of the Department to repay the amount, or a portion of the amount, of any award or bonus paid to the employee under title 5, including under chapters 45 or 53 of such title, or this title if—

(1) the Secretary determines that the individual engaged in misconduct or poor performance prior to payment of the award or bonus, and that such award or bonus would not have been paid, in whole or in part, had the misconduct or poor performance been known prior to payment; and

(2) before such repayment, the employee is afforded—

(A) notice of the proposed order; and

(B) an opportunity to respond to the proposed order by not later than 10 business days after the receipt of such notice; and

(3) the Secretary issues the order—

(A) in the case of a proposed order to which an individual responds under paragraph (2)(B), not later than five business days after receiving the response of the individual; or

(B) in the case of a proposed order to which an individual does not respond, not later than 15 business days after the Secretary provides notice to the individual under paragraph (2)(A).

(b) Appeal of Order of Secretary.—(1) Upon the issuance of an order by the Secretary under subsection (a) with respect to an individual, the individual shall have an opportunity to appeal the order to the Director of the Office of Personnel Management before the date that is seven business days after the date of such issuance.

(2) The Director shall make a final decision with respect to an appeal under paragraph (1) within 30 business days after receiving such appeal.

(Added Pub. L. 115–41, title II, §204(a), June 23, 2017, 131 Stat. 875.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Prior sections 721 and 722 were renumbered sections 1921 and 1922 of this title, respectively.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 115–41, title II, §204(c), June 23, 2017, 131 Stat. 876, provided that: "Section 721 of title 38, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply with respect to an award or bonus paid by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to an employee of the Department of Veterans Affairs on or after the date of the enactment of this Act [June 23, 2017]."
### Part B—Care Grant Program
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 28,2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,Raymond D. Cook, Vice President, Interim Chief Financial Officer and Treasurerof the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes ofTitle 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to thebest of my knowledge:

 
|   | (1)    | the Report fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934, and                                                    |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods indicated. |

 

This Certification has not been, and shall not bedeemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 
| Dated: May 6, 2008 | /s/ RAYMOND D. COOK                     |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                    | Raymond D. Cook                         |
|                    | Vice President, Interim Chief Financial |
|                    | Officer and Treasurer                   |

 

----
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-12-0019 - Denial of Petition for Rulemaking Requesting Amendments to 10 CFR Part 54 Regarding License Renewal Applications Submitted 20 Years Before Expiration of the Operating License (PRM-54-6)

Accession Number: ML113050346

Date Released: Saturday, May 12, 2012

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML113050034 - SECY-12-0019 - Denial of Petition for Rulemaking Requesting Amendments to 10 CFR Part 54 Regarding License Renewal Applications Submitted 20 Years Before Expiration of the Operating License (PRM-54-6) (6 page(s), 1/30/2012)
    - ML113050242 - Denial of Petition for Rulemaking - Federal Register Notice (49 page(s), 1/30/2012)
    - ML113050286 - Letter to Petitioner (3 page(s), 1/30/2012)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
### SUBCHAPTER IV—RESEARCH