alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32**

 

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report Reef Global Energy II, L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Michael J. Mauceli, ChiefExecutive Officer, and Daniel C. Sibley, Chief Financial Officer of ReefPartners LLC, the managing general partner of Reef Global Energy II, L.P.,certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Partnership.

 

This certification is madesolely for the purposes of U.S.C. §1350, and not for any other purpose.

 
| /s/ Michael  J. Mauceli  |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Chief  Executive officer |
| Reef  Partners LLC       |
| August 14,  2003         |
|                     |
|                     |
| /s/ Daniel  C. Sibley    |   |
| Chief  Financial officer |
| Reef  Partners LLC       |
| August 14,  2003         |

 

1

----
### SUBCHAPTER III—SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC ENERGY RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION
#### Teedy DENHAM, Movant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

February 27, 1948.

Lawrence S. Hail for movant.

Eldon S. Dummit, Attorney General, and Paris Swinford, Assistant Attorney General, for the Commonwealth.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal denied; Judgment affirmed.
### §10503. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 10503 was editorially reclassified as section 50103 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
### Part G—Awards and Training

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 103–43, title I, §141(a)(2), June 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 136, redesignated part F "Awards and Training" as G. Former part G "General Provisions" redesignated H.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 228 (Monday, November 29, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69395-69396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26198]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Insulating Glass Manufacturers Alliance

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 15, 2004, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Insulating Glass 
Manufacturers Alliance (``IGMA'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of 
the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of 
its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for 
the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.

[[Page 69396]]

    Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: Insulating 
Glass Manufacturers Alliance, Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. The nature and 
scope of IGMA's standards development activities are: To develop and 
coordinate voluntary consensus standards applicable to the production 
of insulating glass units primarily through its sponsorship and 
administration of a certification program for insulating glass units. 
The IGMA certification program recognizes the need for regular and 
impartial product testing, maintenance of quality control in the 
manufacturing process, and identification of products that conform to 
established criteria. Products eligible for certification under the 
IGMA certification program are insulating glass units meeting the 
current published version of one or more of the following: (1) ASTM 
E2190, Standard Specification for Insulating Glass Unit Performance and 
Evaluation; (2) CAN CGSB 12.8, Insulating Glass Units. IGMA contracts 
with independent agencies and/or auditors to perform facility audits 
and compliance audits to ensure eligibility for certification. As part 
of the certification program, IGMA also provides guidelines to 
manufacturers and others for the implementation of quality assurance 
programs to ensure in-plant quality control.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-26198 Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7920

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JEAN OGLESBY HUBBARD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CR-90-112, CA-95-238-R)

Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: April 29, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jean Oglesby Hubbard, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr.,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying her

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.

Hubbard, Nos. CR-90-112; CA-95-238-R (W.D. Va. Nov. 1, 1995). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3512 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3512

   To amend the Abraham Lincoln Commemorative Coin Act to adjust how 
                      surcharges are distributed.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 29, 2011

  Mr. Nadler introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Abraham Lincoln Commemorative Coin Act to adjust how 
                      surcharges are distributed.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISTRIBUTION OF SURCHARGES.

    Section 7(b) of the Abraham Lincoln Commemorative Coin Act is 
amended by striking ``to the Abraham Lincoln Bicentennial Commission to 
further the work of the Commission'' and inserting the following:
``as follows:
            ``(1) The first $2,000,000, to the Abraham Lincoln 
        Bicentennial foundation, to further its work.
            ``(2) Of any amounts above $2,000,000, equal amounts to the 
        following:
                    ``(A) Ford's Theater, to maintain and preserve the 
                building and its contents.
                    ``(B) President Lincoln's Cottage at the Soldiers' 
                Home, to maintain and preserve the building and its 
                contents.
                    ``(C) The Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library and 
                Museum, for maintenance of the library and museum and 
                their contents.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1061.12 Commission consideration on merits. ( a ) If the Commission proposes to grant an application for exemption it will, in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553, publish a notice of that fact in the Federal Register, including a proposed exemption regulation, and provide an opportunity for written and oral comments on the proposed exemption by any interested party.
( b ) The Commission will evaluate all timely written and oral submissions received from interested parties, as well as any other available and relevant information on the proposal.
( c ) The Commission's evaluation will focus on: ( 1 ) Whether the State or local requirement provides a significantly higher degree of protection than the Commission statute or regulation from the risk of injury or illness that they both address.
( 2 ) Whether the State or local requirement would unduly burden interstate commerce if the grant of the exemption from preemption allows it to go into effect. The Commission will evaluate these factors in accordance with the Commission's statutory preemption provisions and their legislative history.
( 3 ) Whether compliance with the State or local requirements would not cause the product to be in violation of the applicable Commission statute, standard, or regulation.
( d ) If, after evaluating the record, the Commission determines to grant an exemption, it will publish a final exemption regulation, including the findings required by the statutory preemption provisions, in the Federal Register.
( e ) If the Commission denies an application, whether or not published for comment, it will publish its reasons for doing so in the Federal Register.
§ 971.602 Significant adverse environmental effects. ( a ) *Determination of significant adverse environmental effects.* The Administrator will determine the potential for or the occurrence of any significant adverse environmental effect or impact (for the purposes of sections 103(a)(2)(D), 105(a)(4), 106(c) and 109(b) (second sentence) of the Act), on a case-by-case basis.
( b ) *Basis for determination.* Determinations will be based upon the best information available, including relevant environmental impact statements, NOAA-collected data, monitoring results, and other data provided by the applicant or permittee, as well as consideration of the criteria in § 971.601(a).
( c ) *Related considerations.* In making a determination the Administrator may take into account any TCRs or other mitigation measures.
( d ) *Activities with no significant adverse environmental effect.* NOAA believes that exploration-type activities, as listed in the license regulations (15 CFR 970.701), require no further environmental assessment.
( e ) *Activities with potential for significant adverse environmental effects.* NOAA research has identified at-sea testing of recovery equipment, the recovery of manganese nodules in commercial quantities from the deep seabed, and the construction and operation of commercial-scale processing facilities as activities which may have some potential for significant adverse envirnomental effects.
( f ) *Related terms, conditions and restrictions.* Permits will be issued with TCRs containing environmental requirements with respect to protection (pursuant to § 971.419), mitigation (pursuant to § 971.419), or best available technology requirements (pursuant to § 971.423), as appropriate, and monitoring requirements (pursuant to § 971.424) to acquire more information on the environmental effects of deep seabed mining.
PROMISSORY NOTE



$U.S.250,000.00.                                          Dated: January  , 2003




     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned,  ARGOSY INTERNATIONAL,  LTD. ("Maker")
hereby  promises to pay to RMS TITANIC,  INC.  ("Payee") or its order the sum of
TWO HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND  ($U.S.250,000.00)  U.S.  DOLLARS.  Said sum shall be
paid one year from the date hereof (the "Maturity  Date") at Payee's  offices in
Atlanta, Georgia, or such other place designated in writing by Payee.

     All  payments  shall  be first  applied  to  interest  and the  balance  to
principal.  This Note may be prepaid,  at any time, in whole or in part, without
penalty. All prepayments shall be applied in reverse order of maturity.

     This Note is subject to an agreement (the  "Settlement  Agreement") of even
date amongst Maker,  Payee,  Danepath Limited and Graham Jessop.  The payment of
this Note is secured by a Stock Pledge Agreement between Maker and Payee of even
date.

     The  obligations  set forth in this Note are secured by certain assets (the
"Collateral") set forth in a security agreement of even date.

     The undersigned  and all other parties to this Note,  whether as endorsers,
guarantors or sureties,  agree to remain fully bound  hereunder  until this Note
shall be fully paid and waiver demand,  presentment  and protest and all notices
hereto  and  further  agree to  remain  bound,  notwithstanding  any  extension,
renewal,  modification,  waiver,  or other  indulgence by any holder or upon the
discharge  or  release of any  obligor  hereunder  or to this Note,  or upon the
exchange,  substitution,  or release of any  collateral  granted as security for
this Note. No  modification  or indulgence by any holder hereof shall be binding
unless  in  writing;  and any  indulgence  on any one  occasion  shall not be an
indulgence  for any  other or future  occasion.  Any  modification  or change of
terms,  hereunder granted by any holder hereof,  shall be valid and binding upon
the undersigned,  notwithstanding the acknowledgment of the undersigned, and the
undersigned does hereby irrevocably grants a power of attorney to enter into any
such  modification  on its  behalf.  The  rights of any holder  hereof  shall be
cumulative  and not  necessarily  successive.  This Note shall take  effect as a
sealed  instrument  and shall be construed,  governed and enforced in accordance
with  the laws of the  state  first  appearing  at the  head of this  Note.  The
undersigned hereby executes this Note as principal and not as surety.


                                                     ARGOSY INTERNATIONAL, LTD.



                                                     By
#### § 996.3 Fees.

NOAA may charge for its Quality Assurance Program activities such sums as may be permitted or required under this Act, or under other statutory authorities. Such sums are non-refundable. NOAA will attempt to identify any such charges upon first submission of a hydrographic product. However, the intent to charge and the amounts may change. NOAA will promptly notify the sponsor of any such changes, and will permit the sponsor to withdraw hydrographic products from consideration under the Quality Assurance Program should they so choose.
Exhibit 32.2

                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                           by Chief Financial Officer

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of VSB Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Raffaele M. Branca, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 12, 2007

                                        /s/ Raffaele M. Branca
                                        --------------------------------
                                        Raffaele M. Branca
                                        Executive Vice President and CFO

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       30
----

----

**Exhibit      32.1**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of and for the period(s) covered in the                Report. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                October 31, 2007 |   |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|--------|

|   | By:    | /s/                Richard M. Lavers   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   |   | Richard                M. Lavers       |
|   |   | Chief                Executive Officer |

----

----
§ 1116.11 Reports of civil actions under section 37 not admissions. Pursuant to section 37(d), 15 U.S.C. 2084(d), the reporting of a civil action under section 37 shall not constitute an admission of— ( a ) An unreasonable risk of injury;
( b ) A defect in the consumer product which was the subject of the civil action;
( c ) A substantial product hazard;
( d ) An imminent hazard; or
( e ) Any other liability under any statute or any common law.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 13

- 00088

- CV R&RC, LLC and Ramiro C. Ramirez, Appellants

v. BEXAR TRADING BEXAR TRADING COMPANY , Appellee From the 45th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2010

- CI

- 20550 Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Delivered and Filed: September 18, 2013
DIS MISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION On August 19, 2013, appellee filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, asserting the judgment is not a final judgment because the trial court has not determined the amount of attorneys’ fees to be awarded. After examining the record, this court issued an order on August 21, 2013, requiring appellants to file a response to appellee’s motion no later September 3, 2013. On September 4, 2013, appellee filed a motion for extension of time to file its brief, requesting that the deadline for filing its brief be extended until after this court rules on its motion to dismiss. The appellee’s motion stated that appellants indicated to appellee that they did not04

- 13

- 00088

- CV intend to respond to this court’s order. In response to an inquiry by a deputy clerk regarding the status of the appellants’ response to this court’s order, appellants’ attorney stated that he agreed that the judgment was not final and the appeal was prematurely filed. Because no final judgment has been signed in the underly ing cause, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Houston Health Clubs, Inc. v. First Court of Appeals , 722 S.W.2d 692, 693 (Tex. 1986); Northeast Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Aldridge , 400 S.W.2d 893, 895 (Tex. 1966). Costs of the appeal are tax ed against appellants.
PER CURIAM

- 2

-
*Gaffney, Cline & Associates***EXHIBIT 23.3****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT RESERVOIR ENGINEERS**We hereby consent to the inclusion in the Endeavour International Corporation Form 10-K for theyear ended December 31, 2006, and the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement numberNo. 333-119577 of Endeavour International Corporation on Form S-8, number 333-118503 of EndeavourInternational Corporation on Form S-3, Registration Statement number No. 333-128692 of EndeavourInternational Corporation on Form S-8, number 333-130515 of Endeavour International Corporation onForm S-3, number 333-132684 of Endeavour International Corporation on Form S-3, number 333-139304of Endeavour International Corporation on Form S-3, and number 333-124145 of EndeavourInternational Corporation on Form S-3, as amended, of the reference to Gaffney, Cline & AssociatesLtd.Bentley, Hampshire, England
#### Karen Panish, Respondent, v Sam Panish, Appellant.

[818 NYS2d 781]

In an action, inter alia, to impose a constructive trust upon certain real property, the defendant appeals, as limited by his *383notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Kent, J.), dated November 30, 2005, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was to stay all further proceedings in the Justice Court of the Town of East Hampton between the parties and/or Lawrence Panish, and the enforcement and/or execution of any warrant and/or notice issued in such proceedings, pending determination of the action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court did not err in staying a proceeding commenced by the defendant to evict the plaintiff from certain real property pending resolution of this action to impose a constructive trust upon the property *(see Whitmarsh v Farnell,*298 NY 336, 344 [1949]; *Reynolds v Division of Hous. & Community Renewal,*199 AD2d 15 [1993]; *Matter of MacLeod v Shapiro,*20 AD2d 424 [1964]; 3 Dolan, Rasch’s New York Landlord and Tenant-Summary Proceedings § 46:7 [4th ed]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Ritter, Santucci and Lunn, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF
TREASURER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ariella Kapelner, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that:

(i)       
          The accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended
          June 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)       
          The information in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
          financial condition and results of operations of Tally-Ho Ventures, Inc. (the
          Company).

| |  | Date: August 10, 2004BY: /S/ ARIELLA KAPELNER
ARIELLA KAPELNERTreasurer
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.