alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 3.5**

**AMENDMENT NO. 1**

**TO THE**

**BYLAWS**

**OF**

**MARCO COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC.**

The Bylaws of Marco Community Bancorp, Inc. originally adopted on March 3, 2003 are amended on September 17, 2010, as toArticle II, Section 9, so that the Section now reads in its entirety as follows: 

**ARTICLE II**

**STOCKHOLDERS**

**Section 9 -*****RECORD DATE*****.** For the purpose of determining shareholders entitled to notice of or to vote atany meeting of shareholders or any adjournment, or shareholders entitled to receive payment of any dividend, or in order to make a determination of shareholders for any other proper purpose, the Board of Directors shall fix in advance a date as therecord date for any such determination of shareholders. Such date in any case shall be not more than 70 days and, in case of a meeting of shareholders, not fewer than 10 days prior to the date on which the particular action, requiring suchdetermination of shareholders, is to be taken. When a determination of shareholders entitled to vote at any meeting of shareholders has been made as provided in this Section, such determination shall apply equally to any adjournment.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 Nos. 333-73584, 333-42924, 333-89416, 333-102316 and 333-102317) of Applied
Molecular Evolution, Inc., of our report dated February 14, 2003, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Applied Molecular Evolution, Inc.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.


                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP


San Diego, California
February 28, 2003
Exhibit 32.2




Certification Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350


by Principal Accounting Officer




In connection with the Quarterly Report of VSB Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jonathan B. Lipschitz, Vice President, Controller and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May 11, 2010/s/ Jonathan B. LipschitzJonathan B. LipschitzVice President, Controller and Principal Accounting Officer




A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No: II-13-041 June 5, 2013

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416

NRC Increases Oversight of Watts Bar Nuclear Plant for Flood-Related Violations

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is increasing its oversight of the Watts Bar nuclear power 

plant after citing the plant for violations of requirements for analyzing and preparing for potential flooding.

The Watts Bar plant, operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority, is located on Watts Bar Lake about 

60 miles southwest of Knoxville. The lake is part of the Tennessee River system and TVA must account for 

potential flooding in the plant design and emergency procedures. No actual flooding event that would have 

affected the plant’s safety equipment has occurred.

The NRC staff held a conference with TVA officials in late April to discuss the risk significance of 

preliminary inspection findings in the flood protection area. 

After reviewing the NRC inspections and information presented by TVA at the conference, the NRC 

staff concluded that the Watts Bar staff would have been unable to implement some of their flood mitigation 

procedures within the time specified in those procedures. As a result, the NRC concluded that the plant’s flood 

mitigation strategy had been inadequate until July 2012 when the plant took compensatory measures. The NRC 

staff has classified that violation as yellow, meaning it has substantial safety significance.

The NRC staff also found that TVA did not establish adequate flood protection for the potential failure 

of upstream dams. The NRC staff has classified that violation as white, meaning it has low to moderate safety 

significance.

The Watts Bar plant was also cited for a violation because TVA did not notify the NRC within eight 

hours after discovery that the potential failure of the upstream dams and subsequent potential onsite flooding 

resulted in an unanalyzed condition affecting plant safety.

“TVA has taken adequate compensatory measures at the Watts Bar plant to ensure that the flooding

issues are not a current safety concern, but we want to be certain they appropriately address flooding scenarios

that could affect important plant safety equipment on a more long-term basis,” said NRC Region II

Administrator Victor McCree.

The NRC will schedule an inspection to evaluate TVA’s corrective actions for the yellow and white 

issues, and TVA must respond in writing with their corrective actions for the reporting violation. 

The NRC also identified a similar violation for the potential upstream dam scenario and the reporting 

violation at TVA’s Sequoyah nuclear plant. The news release for the flooding issues at the Sequoyah plant can 

be found on the NRC website.
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Agnes Rampe, as Administratrix of the Estate of Mary O’Connor, Deceased, Respondent. Alleyne M. Runyon et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Present—Carswell, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Tatonka Oil and Gas, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2007, as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Brian Hughes, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      to
      my knowledge that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Tatonka Oil and Gas, Inc. and will be retained by Tatonka Oil and Gas, Inc.
      and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.





Date:
                March 22, 2007
            By:*/s/ BRIAN HUGHES*
              
              Brian
                HughesChief
                Executive Officer
### SUBCHAPTER I—PUBLIC AND ASSISTED HOUSING DRUG ELIMINATION
NRC ISSUES BULLETIN ON POTENTIAL DESIGN VULNERABILITY 

IN ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS AT NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a Bulletin to all nuclear power plant 

licensees requesting information about their electric power system designs and alerting them to a 

potential design vulnerability that could affect the operation of key safety equipment.

On Jan. 30, Byron Station, Unit 2, shut down automatically due to unbalanced voltage 

entering the onsite power distribution system from the transmission network. The plant’s electric 

power system’s protection scheme was not designed to sense the loss of one of three power 

phases and automatically trip circuits to isolate the degraded outside power source and switch to 

emergency backup power. Plant operators diagnosed the problem eight minutes later and 

manually tripped the necessary circuits. 

The degraded offsite power source potentially could have damaged the plant’s emergency 

core cooling system. NRC regulations and plant technical specifications require reliable off-site 

and onsite power systems with sufficient capacity and capability to operate safety-related 

systems. Therefore, the NRC staff is seeking information to verify compliance with existing 

regulations and plant-specific licensing bases. The staff will use the information it receives to 

inform the Commission and determine if further regulatory action is needed.

The NRC issued Information Notice 2012-03 on March 1 to inform licensees of recent 

experience involving loss of one of three phases of the offsite power circuit, including the Byron 

event. The current Bulletin requests licensees to provide information on their electric system 

designs within 90 days. It applies to the 104 currently operating commercial power reactors and 

the four combined licenses for new reactors issued earlier this year. It does not apply to licensees 

who have permanently ceased operation and certified that the fuel has been removed from the 

reactor vessel.

Bulletin 2012-01, “Design Vulnerability in Electric Power System,” is available on the 

NRC website. 

###

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand.

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 12-086 July 27, 2012
#### § 230.3 New Standard Reference Materials.

When new SRM's or renewals of old ones are issued, announcements are made in SP 260, its supplement, and in scientific and trade journals.
§ 990.24 Compliance with other applicable laws and regulations. ( a ) *Worker health and safety.* When taking actions under this part, trustees must comply with applicable worker health and safety considerations specified in the NCP for response actions.
( b ) *Natural Resources protection.* When acting under this part, trustees must ensure compliance with any applicable consultation, permitting, or review requirements, including but not limited to: the Endangered Species Act of 1973, 16 U.S.C. 1531 *et seq.;* the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, 16 U.S.C. 1451 *et seq.;* the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, 16 U.S.C. 703 *et seq.;* the National Marine Sanctuaries Act, 16 U.S.C. 1431 *et seq.;* the National Historic Preservation Act, 12 U.S.C. 470 *et seq.;* the Marine Mammal Protection Act, 16 U.S.C. 1361 *et seq.;* and the Archaeological Resources Protection Act, 16 U.S.C. 470 *et seq.*
Exhibit 32


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


<PAGE>

Exhibit 32


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Xpention  Genetics,  Inc.  (formerly
Bayview Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended November
30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  the  undersigned,  in the capacities and on the dates indicated
below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  January 23, 2006


/s/ David Kittrell
---------------------------------------
David Kittrell, CEO and CFO
#### § 1119.5 Enforcement notification.

A person will be informed in writing if it is believed that the person has violated the law and if the Commission intends to seek a civil penalty. Any person who receives such a writing will have an opportunity to submit evidence and arguments that it should not pay a penalty or should not pay a penalty in the amount sought by the Commission.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mark Mitchell, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 116]

Motion for writ of error coram nobis denied. Present — Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Kehoe and Smith, JJ.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-20085

(Summary Calendar)

PAUL MAPLES,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

versus

PASADENA INDEPENDENT 

SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(H-96-CV-1753)

July 15, 1997

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff-Appellant Paul Maples asks us to reverse the

judgment of the district court dismissing his original and amended

complaints pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).
2

Specifically, Maples presents for our review alleged reversible

error by the district court in its determination that Maples had

neither a protected property nor liberty interest and did not state

a “First Amendment retaliation claim.” Additionally, in his

Statement of the Case on appeal, Maples makes reference to the

court’s failure to address his intentional infliction of emotional

distress claim and the court’s ruling regarding the statute of

limitations. 

In our de novo review we have carefully studied the record on

appeal and the facts, law, and arguments presented by counsel in

their briefs to this court. We have also considered the patiently

exhaustive discussion and explanation of this case as set forth in

the Memorandum and Order of the district court filed December 24,

1996. Based on our review, we are persuaded that the district

court correctly analyzed this case and the pleadings in light of

the facts and the law and reached the correct conclusions for the

right reasons. We would serve no useful purpose by writing

further, given the disposition of this case by the district court.

Consequently, the rulings and judgment of the district court are,

in all respects, 

AFFIRMED.
§ 997.20 General. ( a ) For the purposes of these certification regulations, when the verb “describe” is used it indicates that the RICE shall give an account in text that responds to the requirement. This text shall contain sufficient information to demonstrate how the RCOS satisfies the certification requirement. The RCOS may include a link(s) to additional information. When the verb “document” is used, it indicates that the RCOS shall furnish a document(s) that responds to the requirement. A text statement accompanying the document(s) will normally be necessary to provide context for the document(s) and to demonstrate how the RCOS satisfies the certification requirement. The RICE may include a link to a document in the accompanying text statement.
( b ) Documentation that addresses the certification requirements may include references to existing RCOS documents. All documents and materials may be submitted directly to the U.S. IOOSOffice or made accessible for public viewing on the RCOS's Web site.
( c ) To become certified, an RCOS must submit an application that addresses each of the requirements listed in this subpart.
No: 14-049 August 15, 2014

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

NRC Meeting Aug. 26 to Discuss Proposed Language For 

Consolidated Accident Mitigation Rule

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with members of the public and industry 

representatives Aug. 26 in Rockville, Md., to discuss potential rule language that would enhance 

U.S. nuclear power plants’ ability to respond to a reactor accident. The rulemaking is part of the NRC’s 

efforts to implement the lessons learned from the Fukushima nuclear accident in March 2011.

The meeting will run from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. in Room 6-A28 of the NRC’s Three White Flint 

North building, 11601 Landsdown St. in Rockville. The staff will discuss their efforts in crafting the 

rule, as well as how the agency examines how accident mitigation imposes new requirements on 

existing plants. Industry representatives will discuss the mitigation strategy guidance they’ve created to 

this point. The public will be able to comment and ask questions at several points in the meeting.

The public can participate via teleconference and webinar. Anyone interested in calling in or 

using the webinar should contact Jennifer Tobin at 301-415-2328 or jennifer.tobin@nrc.gov by Aug. 22 

to ensure proper resources are available. The preliminary proposed rule language will be available on 

Regulations.gov under Docket IDs NRC-2011-0299 and NRC-2012-0031; as well as on ADAMS, the 

NRC’s electronic document database, under accession number ML14218A253.

The proposed rule would create permanent regulations for future reactors, based on the concepts 

of an Order the NRC issued to all U.S. plants in March 2012. Under the Order, plants must obtain 

resources and create integrated plans and procedures to restore and maintain key safety functions if an 

external event, such as an earthquake or a flood, impacts the installed power distribution and safety 

systems.
#### § 1025.64 Attorneys.

Any attorney at law who is admitted to practice before any United States court or before the highest court of any State, the District of Columbia, or any territory or commonwealth of the United States, may practice before the Commission. An attorney's own representation that he/she is in good standing before any of such courts shall be sufficient proof thereof, unless otherwise directed by the Presiding Officer or the Commission.
No. III-12-008

Contacts: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663

 March 6, 2012

 E-Mail: opa3@nrc.gov 

NRC IS MONITORING AN UNUSUAL EVENT AT PRAIRIE ISLAND

NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is monitoring an Unusual Event – the 

lowest emergency level in the NRC’s emergency classification system - declared at 6:24

a.m. CT at the Prairie Island Nuclear Generation Plant Unit 2. The declaration was made

due to an indication of an increase in reactor coolant system leakage. The two-unit plant,

operated by Northern States Power Co.– Minnesota, is located in Welch, Minn.,

approximately 26 miles southeast of Minneapolis.

The NRC has activated its Incident Response Center in the Region III office in 

Lisle, Ill. Two NRC resident inspectors have responded to the site and are following the 

event in consultation with Region III staff.

Unit 2 is shut down for a refueling outage. The workers at the plant identified an 

apparent decrease in reactor vessel coolant level and are taking actions to further 

understand the situation. The plant is maintaining the appropriate level of water in the 

reactor. The NRC is monitoring the plant’s efforts.

There was no radiation released or impact to plant workers or the public. Unit 1 is 

at full power.

Once the event is over, the NRC will fully investigate the cause of contributing 

factors to the incident.

###

NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web 

address: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also 

offers a SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to 

NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region III

2443 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532
### SUBCHAPTER II—ADDITIONAL WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH PROGRAMS
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015 as
filed with the SEC on the date hereof, I, Eva Chen, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 25, 2016



By:

/s/ Eva ChenName:

Eva ChenTitle:

Chief Financial Officer




|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
### Part J—Carbon Dioxide Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior part J related to ultra-deepwater and unconventional natural gas and other petroleum resources, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 113–67, div. A, title III, §301(a), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 1181.
### Part N—National Resource Center