alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**GAO-02-982R**                      Published: Jul 26, 2002. Publicly Released: Jul 26, 2002.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Status of FY22 Projects 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

GAO reviewed the audit report covering the financial statements of the Future Farmers of America for fiscal years 2001 and 2000. GAO found no reportable instances of noncompliance. The audit reports included the auditors' opinions that the financial statements of the corporation were presented fairly in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

## Full Report

Full Report (2 pages)

Accessible Text 

## Office of Public Affairs

### Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

### Public Inquiries

Public Affairs
PublicAffairs@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

Auditing and Financial Management

Audit reportsFederal corporationsFinancial statement auditsAccounting standardsReporting requirementsFinancial statementsFarmingFederally chartered corporationFinancial managementRegulatory noncompliance
### §11364. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this subchapter $2,200,000,000 for fiscal year 2010 and such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2011.

(Pub. L. 100–77, title IV, §408, as added Pub. L. 111–22, div. B, title I, §1105, May 20, 2009, 123 Stat. 1678.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1105 of Pub. L. 111–22, which directed amendment of subtitle A of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act by adding this section at the end, was executed by adding this section at the end of subtitle A of title IV of Pub. L. 100–77 (this part), to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the earlier of 18 months after May 20, 2009, or 3 months after publication of certain final regulations by Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, see section 1503 of Pub. L. 111–22, set out as an Effective Date of 2009 Amendment note under section 11302 of this title.
### subpart 2—wtc survivors
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-13-0107 - Status of the Accident Sequence Precursor Program and the Standardized Plant Analysis Risk Models

Accession Number: ML13232A062

Date Released: Friday, October 25, 2013

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML13232A094 - SECY-13-0107 - Status of the Accident Sequence Precursor Program and the Standardized Plant Analysis Risk Models (7 page(s), 10/4/2013)
    - ML13232A092 - SECY-13-0107 - Enclosure 1- Results Trends and Insights of the Accident Sequence Precursor Program (16 page(s), 10/4/2013)
    - ML13233A222 - SECY-13-0107 - Enclosure 2 - Status of the Standardized Plant Analysis Risk Models (5 page(s), 10/4/2013)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
## SERVED: March 10, 2014 US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C.
IN THE MATTER OF

- SKYWEST AIRLINES 

### FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BEASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0904 FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0868 FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0869 FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0872 FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0873 FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0874 FDMS NO. FAA-2013- 0617 FDMS NO. FAA-2013- 0619

HEARING NOTICE 

### NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN thattestimony and evidence will beheard and considered onMay 19 through 23,2014, inclusive, in the U.S. Tax Court, Courtroom 5223, Wallace F. Bennett Federal Building, 125 S. State Street, Salt Lake City, UT 84138 1•



### Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative LawJudge ·Attachment: Service List

1Counsel may present the cases in any sequence. Absent agreementthe cases will be heard in the order listed.c SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY
. Federal AviationAdministration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W10001

Todd C. Emerson, 

### Respondent's Counsel Director

- Government and Legal Affairs SkyWest Airlines 444 SouthRiver Road St. George, UT 84790 TEL: 435-634-3530
. FAX: 435-634-3505 ONE COPY

Michael L. Dworkin, 

### Respondent's Counsel MICHAEL L. DWORKIN AND ASSOCIATES 465 California Street, Suite 210 San Francisco, CA 94104 TEL: 415-421-2500 FAX: 415-421-2560 EMAIL: law@avialex.com Robert Spitzer, 

### Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office ofRegional Counsel Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, WA 98057 TEL: 425-227-1417 FAX: 425-227-1007 FDMS Nos. FAA-2012- 0868,2012-0869,2012-0872, 2012-0873,2012-0874,2013- 0617,2013-0619,2012-0904
· (Civil PenaltyActions)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 2

### The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536

3
§ 930.101 Supplemental coordination for proposed activities. ( a ) For federal assistance activities that were previously determined by the State agency to be consistent with the management program, but which have not yet begun, the applicant agency shall further coordinate with the State agency if the proposed activity will affect any coastal use or resource substantially different than originally described. Substantially different coastal effects are reasonably foreseeable if: ( 1 ) The applicant agency makes substantial changes in the proposed activity that are relevant to management program enforceable policies; or
( 2 ) There are significant new circumstances or information relevant to the proposed activity and the proposed activity's effect on any coastal use or resource.
( 3 ) Substantial changes were made to the activity during the period of the State agency's initial review and the State agency did not receive notice of the substantial changes during its review period, and these changes are relevant to management program enforceable policies and/or affect coastal uses or resources.
( b ) The State agency may notify the applicant agency, the Federal agency and the Director of proposed activities which the State agency believes should be subject to supplemental coordination. The State agency's notification shall include information supporting a finding of substantially different coastal effects than originally described and the relevant enforceable policies, and may recommend modifications to the proposed activity (if any) that would allow the applicant agency to implement the proposed activity consistent with the management program. State agency notification under paragraph (b) of this section does not remove the requirement under paragraph (a) of this section for applicant agencies to notify State agencies.
[65 FR 77154, Dec. 8, 2000, as amended at 71 FR 829, Jan. 5, 2006]
First Department,

June, 1949.

(June 7, 1949.)

#### Clarkton Realty Corporation et al., Appellants, v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., et al., Respondents. (14 related actions against same defendants.)

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Russell C. Horowitz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Marchex, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Marchex, Inc.



|                   |  |  |  |        |  |                           
|------------------ |  |  |  | ------ |  | --------------------------
|Date: May 10, 2010 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/    RUSSELL C.
HOROWITZ
|                   |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Russell C. Horowitz       
|                   |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
##### 



To:
    
    Endeavour International CorporationFrom:
    
    BNP Paribas S.A. (the
Agent)Date:
    
    9 March 2007
 
 Endeavour International Corporation (the Company)
    
 1.
    
    INTRODUCTION1.1
    
    We refer to:-
 1.1.1
    
    the Credit Agreement; and1.1.2
    
    the Companys recent request relating to its compliance with Clause 24.4  Gearing.
 1.2
    
    Unless otherwise defined in this letter, terms defined in the Credit Agreement (whether
expressly or by incorporation and as the context so requires) shall have the same meaning when
used in this letter.2.
    
    WAIVER CONSENTWith effect from the date of this letter:
 Gearing Gearing st




---



##### 



3.
    
    GENERAL3.1
    
    Save as expressly provided for in this letter, no provision of any Finance Document is
waived, amended or otherwise modified and the waivers and amendments contemplated in this
letter shall be without prejudice to the rights and remedies of the Secured Creditors with
respect to any other matters.3.2
    
    This letter is a designated Finance Document.3.3
    
    This letter may be executed in a number of counterparts, and this has the same effect as if
the signatures on the counterparts were on a single copy of this letter.3.4
    
    This letter is governed by English law.3.5
    
    Please confirm your acceptance of the terms of this letter by counter-signing this letter or
a copy of it.
 Yours faithfully,/s/ Remi Collonges-Dufouleur
    
    /s/ Severine CantoiaRémi COLLONGES-DUFOULEUR
    
    Severine CANTOIAFor and on behalf ofBNP Paribas S.A.
 
 /s/ Lance GillilandFor and on behalf of Endeavour International Corporation(for itself and on behalf of each other Obligor)
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-12-0103 - Sixth Report on the Status of Reactivation of Construction and Licensing for Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2

Accession Number: ML12152A056

Date Released: Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML12152A048 - SECY-12-0103 - Sixth Report on the Status of Reactivation of Construction and Licensing for Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 (9 page(s), 7/24/2012)
    - ML12157A304 - SECY-12-0103 - Enclosure 1 - Statistical Status Report - Sixth Report on the Status of Reactivation of Construction and Licensing for Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 (1 page(s), 7/24/2012)
    - ML12157A461 - SECY-12-0103 - Enclosure 2 - Future Activities for Watts Bar Unit 2, Reactivation Project Plan (1 page(s), 7/24/2012)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
**AD Economic Evaluation**



### Docket No . FAA - 2011 - 0923 Directorate ID : 2009 - SW - 20 - AD Helicopter Model: Eurocopter France Model AS350B, B1, B2, B3, BA, and D; and AS355E, F,

F1, F2, and N Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 791 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : Cracks have been discovered in the spar of the upper fin ; modifying the upper and lower fin attachment is intended to prevent failure of a spar, loss of a fin, and a separated fin hitting a rotor . Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 453 Labor per Helicopter ( 4 x $ 8 5 /work-hour) $ 340 Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ 793 Total US Fleet Cost $ 627,263 Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Y es ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Pr oject Engineer : 

### Jim Grigg
§ 1112.23 May a CSPC-accepted third party conformity assessment body subcontract work conducted for purposes of section 14 of the CPSA? ( a ) A CPSC-accepted third party conformity assessment body (which, for purposes of this section, also will be referred to as the prime contractor) may only subcontract work conducted for purposes of section 14 of the CPSA to other third party conformity assessment bodies whose accreditation has been accepted by the CPSC for the scope necessary for the subcontracted work. Violation of this provision constitutes compromising the integrity of the testing process and may be grounds for withdrawal of the CPSC's acceptance of the accreditation of the prime and/or subcontracting third party conformity assessment body.
( b ) The provisions of this part apply to all CPSC-accepted third party conformity assessment bodies, even if they are a prime contractor and/or a subcontractor.
#### § 1310.4 Effective date.

By statute, the effective date of this ban is November 12, 2022. The effective date of this rule is September 15, 2023.
Exhibit 32.2

                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                           by Chief Financial Officer

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of VSB Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Raffaele M. Branca, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: May 11, 2004

                                       /s/ RAFFAELE M. BRANCA
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Raffaele M. Branca
                                       Executive Vice President and CFO

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       28
#### Reuben Gerber, Respondent, v. Arnold Constable Company, Incorporated, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 17, 2018

No. 04-17-00366-CR & 04-17-00367-CR

Roger Trudell DAVIS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR3461 & 2015CR6145

Honorable Steve Hilbig, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file the motion for rehearing is granted. The 

motion for rehearing is denied.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of September, 2018.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT ITEM
10 (a)(1)
RULE 30a-2(a) CERTIFICATIONS



I, Brian T.
Zino, certify that: 



	1.	 	
I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of Seligman Time Horizon/Harvester
Series, Inc.; 







	2.	 	
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 







	3.	 	
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the
financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 







	4.	 	
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and
have: 







	a)	 	
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; 







	b)	 	
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to
the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and 







	c)	 	
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent
fiscal half-year (the registrant’s second fiscal half-year in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting; and 







	5.	 	
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 







	a)	 	
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize,
and report financial information; and 







	b)	 	
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting. 






	Date: March 5, 2004	 	/S/ BRIAN T. ZINO	 
	   	 	Brian T. Zino	 
	   	 	Principal Executive Officer
No. I-13-038 November 7, 2013 

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331

NRC Proposes $7,000 Civil Penalty Against Puerto Rico Firm

for Violation of Order

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $7,000 fine against a Santurce, Puerto 

Rico, company for a violation involving its failure to comply with an NRC order.

In an order issued Aug. 7, 2012, the NRC notified Centro de Medicina (CDM) Nuclear that it 

had failed to pay its annual licensing fee to the agency and it had 20 days to do so. When the firm did 

not comply, the NRC revoked CDM’s license on Aug. 28, 2012, and required CDM to take several 

steps, including arranging for the disposal or transfer of any licensed nuclear materials possessed under 

its license.

An NRC inspector conducted a site visit on Jan. 17, 2013, and confirmed that the company’s 

licensed radioactive sources were properly accounted for and secured. To date, however, CDM has not 

complied with the order or responded to communications from the NRC.

An NRC letter to the company regarding this enforcement action states, “In assessing the 

significance of this violation, the NRC considered that CDM has failed to comply with the NRC order 

for more than a year and has taken no action to initiate decommissioning of its site or arrange for the 

transfer or disposal of its licensed radioactive materials. Additionally, CDM’s continued failure to 

provide the required information to, and communicate with, the NRC has impeded the NRC from 

carrying out its regulatory mission of protecting public health and safety and the environment, and has 

resulted in additional unplanned site visits to CDM’s facility to verify the security of CDM’s licensed 

material.”

Should the firm fail to adhere to the order within 60 days, the NRC will impose daily civil 

penalties of $100 per day. Because the NRC’s primary concern is ensuring that CDM meets its 

obligation to properly dispose of the licensed nuclear material in its possession, if the company 

transfers or disposes of the material within 60 days, the NRC will forgo all civil penalties and terminate 

the company’s license.
### **CHAPTER 69—COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT**

Sec.
5301.
Congressional findings and declaration of purpose.
5302.
General provisions.
5303.
Grants to States, units of general local government and Indian tribes; authorizations.
5304.
Statement of activities and review.
5305.
Activities eligible for assistance.
5306.
Allocation and distribution of funds.
5307.
Special purpose grants.
5308.
Guarantee and commitment to guarantee loans for acquisition of property.
5309.
Nondiscrimination in programs and activities.
5310.
Labor standards; rate of wages; exceptions; enforcement powers.
5311.
Remedies for noncompliance with community development requirements.
5312.
Use of grants for settlement of outstanding urban renewal loans of units of general local government.
5313.
Reporting requirements.
5313a.
Duplication of benefits.
5314.
Consultation by Secretary with other Federal departments, etc.
5315.
Interstate agreements or compacts; purposes.
5316.
Transition provisions.
5317.
Liquidation of superseded or inactive programs.
5318.
Urban development action grants.
5318a.
John Heinz Neighborhood Development Program.
5319.
Community participation in programs.
5320.
Historic preservation requirements.
5321.
Suspension of requirements for disaster areas.
5322.
Funds made available for administrative costs without regard to particular disaster appropriation.