alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Unassociated Document


    Summary
      of Loan Agreement by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Eastern
      Branch, Agricultural Bank of China dated June 22,
      2007.

     

    Summary
      of the main articles 

    
      	
              Ø

            	
              Contract
                number: NO.81101200700001153

            


    

    
      	
              Ø

            	
              Loan
                Principal: RMB 60 million;

            


    

    
      	
              Ø

            	
              Loan
                term: from June 22, 2007 to June 22,
                2008

            


    

    
      	
              Ø

            	
              Interest
                rate: annually 6.57%, payable on the 20th
                of
                each month;

            


    

    n Penalty
      interest rate for delayed repayment: 5.022% plus 50% *5.022%;

    n Penalty
      interest rate for embezzlement of loan proceeds: 5.022% * 2;

    
      	
              Ø

            	
              Purpose
                of the loan is to provide working capital for the Company;
                

            


    

    
      	
              Ø

            	
              Advanced
                repayment of loan needs to be approved by the Lender;
                

            


    

    
      	
              Ø

            	
              Breach
                of contract penalties: suspension of loan un-provided, demand prepayment
                of loan principal and interest before maturity; imposition of punitive
                interest; compensation for the Lender’s expenses incurred due to the
                Company’s breach of contract such as lawyer’s fee, travel cost in case of
                litigation, etc.

            


    

     

    Summary
      of the articles omitted 

    
      	
              Ø

            	
              Types
                of the loan 

            


    

    
      	
              Ø

            	
              Clearing
                of the loan interest 

            


    

    
      	
              Ø

            	
              Condition
                precedent to the drawing of the loan


            


    

    
      	
              Ø

            	
              Rights
                and obligations of the borrower

            


    

    
      	
              Ø

            	
              Rights
                and obligations of the lender 

            


    

    
      	
              Ø

            	
              Guarantee
                of the loan 

            


    

    
      	
              Ø

            	
              Dispute
                settlement 

            


    

    
      	
              Ø

            	
              Miscellaneous
                

            


    

    
      	
              Ø

            	
              Validity

            


    

    
      	
              Ø

            	
              Notes
### subpart iv—state legal assistance development program
### Part A–1—Advanced Notification of Traveling Sex Offenders
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Appellate case name: Bradley Jared Barton v. Office of Attorney General

Appellate case number: 01-19-00677-CV

Trial court case number: 2018-84841

Trial court: 309th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Bradley Jared Barton, has filed a Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of 

Court Costs. The Court abates this appeal for the trial court to hold a hearing to hear evidence 

and issue findings of fact to determine whether appellant is indigent. See TEX. R. APP. P.

20.1(b)(3). The court coordinator of the trial court shall set a date for said hearing within 30 days 

of the date of this Order and notify the parties, including appellant. If appellant is now 

incarcerated, he may appear by closed video teleconference.1 The trial court shall have a court 

reporter, or court recorder, record the hearing and file the reporter’s record with this Court no 

later than 30 days from the date of the indigency hearing. The trial court clerk shall file a clerk’s 

record containing the trial court’s findings no later than 30 days from the date of the indigency 

hearing.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active 

docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the clerk’s record and 

reporter’s record of the hearing are filed with this Court.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ________/s/ Russell Lloyd______________

 Acting individually 

Date: October 8, 2019_____________

 

1 Any such teleconference must use a closed-circuit video teleconferencing system that provides for a 

simultaneous compressed full motion video and interactive communication of image and sound between 

the trial court, appellant, and any attorneys representing the State or appellant. On request, appellant and 

his counsel shall be able to communicate privately without being recorded or heard by the trial court or the 

attorney representing the State.
### subpart 1—[repealed]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 111–358, title IX, §901(c)(1), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 4044, struck out heading for subpart 1 "PILOT PROGRAM OF GRANTS TO SPECIALTY SCHOOLS FOR SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS".
**Exhibit 99.3**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. §1350,**

 

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of SierraWireless, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the periodended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof, I, David B. Sutcliffe, Chief Executive Officerof the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  March 24,  2005      |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                  |
|                                  |
| /s/  DAVID B. SUTCLIFFE          |   |
| David  B. Sutcliffe                   |
| Chairman  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

SHARELL HORTON AND ANDREA

NORWOOD

VERSUS

BATON ROUGE POLICE

DEPARTMENT, CITY OF BATON

ROUGE/ EAST BATON ROUGE

PARISH, SAUNDRA W. WATTS, 

AND STATE FARM MUTUAL

AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY

NO. 2022 CW 0016

MARCH 10, 2022

In Re: City of Baton Rouge/ Parish of East Baton Rouge, 

applying for supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District

Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 681306. 

BEFORE: McDONALD, LANIER, AND WOLFE, TT. 

WRIT GRANTED. The district court' s August 2, 2021 ruling

granting plaintiffs' motion to strike the jury is reversed. A

pleading demanding a jury trial must be filed no later than ten

days after service of the last pleading directed to any issue

triable by jury. La. Code Civ. P. art. 1733( C). The defendant, 

the City/ Parish of East Baton Rouge, filed an answer on March

26, 2021, in which it included a request for a

jury trial. A

defendant may file its answer at any time prior to the signing

of a default judgment against him. La. Code Civ. P. art. 1002. 

No default judgment was signed in this case, and therefore, the

answer filed by the City/ Parish of East Baton Rouge was timely

filed. Since defendant' s jury demand was made in an answer, it

necessarily was filed within ten days from the last pleading

directed to any issue triable by jury. See Boudreaux v. Total

CATV, Inc., 536 So. 2d 571, 572 ( La. App. lst Cir. 1988). 

Therefore, plaintiffs' motion to strike the jury is denied. 

JMM

WIL

EW

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

01

4DETY CLE K OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
### Part B—Personnel Provisions
#### John J. Connors, Respondent, v. International Railway Company, Appellant.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, unless appellant file and serve printed brief and pay to respondent’s attorney ten dollars by October eleventh and be ready to argue appeal on October seventeenth.
# AGENCY SPOTLIGHT

 

**U.S.Department of State, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs**—The bureau(formerly part of the U.S. Information Agency) has announced an opencompetition (RFP E/PN-00-09) for assistance awards for exchanges and trainingprograms for the Newly Independent States of Russia, Belarus, Moldova, Ukraine,Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Uzbekistan. Thebureau seeks exchange programs that address the following themes: Women’sLeadership Programs (all countries), Women’s Political Leadership Programs(Russia, Moldova, Ukraine, Kazakhstan), Professional and Business AssociationsPrograms (Russia, Moldova, Ukraine, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia),Content-Based Internet Training (West NIS, Caucasus), Distance Learning in theField of Business Management (Ukraine), Public Library Reform (Ukraine),Caucasus Regional Cooperation, and more. The bureau is interested in proposalswhose designs take into account the need for ongoing sharing of information andtraining. 

 

The deadline for submission of proposals is 5:00 pm,December 22, 1999. For further information, visithttp://e.usia.gov/education/rfps/. To request an application package, contactThomas Driscoll, program coordinator, tel: (202) 260-6230 or email:[email protected].
No: 14-004 January 30, 2014

CONTACT: Maureen Conley, 301-415-8200 

NRC Issues Final Environmental Impact Statement

on Dewey-Burdock Uranium Recovery Project

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued the final supplemental environmental impact 

statement (SEIS) for the proposed Dewey-Burdock in-situ uranium recovery project in Custer and Fall 

River counties in South Dakota. The report concludes there are no environmental impacts that would 

preclude licensing the facility.

Powertech (USA) Inc. submitted a license application for the facility on Aug. 10, 2009. The 

license would authorize Powertech to construct, operate and ultimately decommission the facility. The 

facility would use the in-situ recovery process to extract uranium from underground ore and convert the 

recovered uranium into yellowcake for use in the production of nuclear fuel. 

The NRC report analyzes environmental impacts specific to the Dewey-Burdock site and 

mitigation strategies to reduce or avoid adverse effects on the surrounding environment. The staff 

completed its analysis in March 2013 of the safety aspects of the application in a separate technical 

review. That review concluded that Powertech’s application complies with NRC regulations. The NRC 

is also reviewing the project’s potential impacts on historic and cultural resources and would only issue 

a license after that process is completed. Later this year, an NRC Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 

will hear oral arguments from interveners that raised concerns about the project.

The SEIS for the proposed Dewey-Burdock uranium recovery project is available on the NRC 

website as Supplement 4 to NUREG-1910, Generic Environmental Impact Statement for In-Situ Leach 

Uranium Milling Facilities. More information on the application and the staff’s review is also available 

on the NRC website.
# L_2023004EN.01005401.xml

| 5.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 4/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 4/54

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 232/2019

of 27 September 2019

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2023/37]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/831 of 22 May 2019 amending Annexes II, III and V to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cosmetic products (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/831 of 22 May 2019 amending Annexes II, III and V to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cosmetic products (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 1a (Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XVI of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32019 R 0831: Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/831 of 22 May 2019 (OJ L 137, 23.5.2019, p. 29).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32019 R 0831: Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/831 of 22 May 2019 (OJ L 137, 23.5.2019, p. 29).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) 2019/831 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 28 September 2019, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 27 September 2019.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gunnar PÁLSSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 137, 23.5.2019, p. 29.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 4891] 

The Industry Advisory Panel of the Overseas Buildings Operations will meet on Thursday, December 9, 2004 from 9:45 a.m. until 3:30 p.m. Eastern Standard Time. The meeting will be held at the Department of State, 2201 C Street, NW., (entrance on 23rd Street), Washington, DC. The majority of the meeting is devoted to an exchange of ideas between the Department's Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations' senior management and the panel members, on design, operations and building maintenance. Members of the public are asked to kindly refrain from joining the discussion until Director Williams opens the discussion to the public. 

                    Due to limited seating space for members of the public, we ask that you kindly e-mail your information. To participate in this meeting, simply register by e-mail at                     *IAPR@STATE.GOV*                     before December 3, 2004. Your email should include the following information; Date of birth, social security number, company name and title. This information is required to issue a temporary pass to enter the building.                 

                    For questions, please contact                     *PinzinoLE3@state.gov*                     or call tel: 703/875-6872;                 

                    Ms. Gina Pinzino; or                     *SpragueMA@state.gov*                     tel: 703/875-7173 for Michael Sprague.                 

Charles E. Williams,

Director/Chief Operating Officer, Overseas Buildings Operations, Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 04-26169 Filed 11-23-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-24-P
### Part A—HOME Investment Partnerships
### §8129. Preference for offerors employing veterans

(a) Preference.—(1) In awarding a contract for the procurement of goods or services, the Secretary may give a preference to offerors that employ veterans on a full-time basis.

(2) The Secretary shall determine such preference based on the percentage of the full-time employees of the offeror who are veterans.

(b) Enforcement Penalties for Misrepresentation.—(1) Any offeror that is determined by the Secretary to have willfully and intentionally misrepresented the veteran status of the employees of the offeror for purposes of subsection (a) may be debarred from contracting with the Department for a period of not less than five years.

(2) If the Secretary carries out a debarment under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall—

(A) commence debarment action against the offeror by not later than 30 days after determining that the offeror willfully and intentionally misrepresented the veteran status of the employees of the offeror as described in paragraph (1); and

(B) complete debarment actions against such offeror by not later than 90 days after such determination.

(3) The debarment of an offeror under paragraph (1) includes the debarment of all principals in the offeror for a period of not less than five years.

(Added Pub. L. 116–315, title VII, §7003(a), Jan. 5, 2021, 134 Stat. 5058.)
### SUBCHAPTER XIII—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY SCIENCE EDUCATION PROGRAMS

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This subchapter was enacted as part of part E (§§3161–3168) of title XXXI of div. C of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991, known as the Department of Energy Science Education Enhancement Act, and not as part of the Department of Energy Organization Act which comprises this chapter.
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PetroleumDevelopment Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certify pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| /s/ Steven R. Williams                 |  | May 6, 2005 |
|----------------------------------------|--|-------------|
| Steven R. Williams, Chairman,          |  |
| and Chief Executive Officer            |  |
|                                        |  |
|                                        |  |
| /s/ Darwin L. Stump                    |  | May 6, 2005 |
| Darwin L. Stump                        |  |
| Chief  Financial Officer and Treasurer |  |

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signaturethat appears in typed form within the electronic version of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, has been provided to Petroleum DevelopmentCorporation and will be retained by Petroleum Development Corporation andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §435. Generally applicable remedies and limitations

(a) Attorney's Fees.—If a covered employee, with respect to any claim under this chapter, or a qualified person with a disability, with respect to any claim under section 421, is a prevailing party in any proceeding under section 453(1), the administrative agency may award attorney's fees, expert fees, and any other costs as would be appropriate if awarded under section 706(k) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

(b) Interest.—In any proceeding under section 453(1), the same interest to compensate for delay in payment shall be made available as would be appropriate if awarded under section 717(d) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

(c) Civil Penalties and Punitive Damages.—Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, no civil penalty or punitive damages may be awarded with respect to any claim under this chapter.

(d) Exclusive Procedure.—

(1) In general.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), no person may commence an administrative or judicial proceeding to seek a remedy for the rights and protections afforded by this chapter except as provided in this chapter and in sections 1296 and 1346(g) and chapter 179 of title 28.

(2) Veterans.—A covered employee under section 416 may also utilize any provisions of chapter 43 of title 38 that are applicable to that employee.

(e) Scope of Remedy.—Only a covered employee who has undertaken and completed the procedures described in section 452 may be granted a remedy under part A of this subchapter.

(f) Construction.—

(1) Definitions and exemptions.—Except where inconsistent with definitions and exemptions provided in this chapter, the definitions and exemptions in the laws made applicable by this chapter shall apply under this chapter.

(2) Size limitations.—Notwithstanding paragraph (1), provisions in the laws made applicable under this chapter (other than paragraphs (2) and (3) of section 2(a) of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act) determining coverage based on size, whether expressed in terms of numbers of employees, amount of business transacted, or other measure, shall not apply in determining coverage under this chapter.

(g) Political Affiliation.—It shall not be a violation of any provision of this chapter to consider, or make any employment decision based on, the party affiliation, or political compatibility with the employing office, of an employee who is a covered employee.

(Added Pub. L. 104–331, §2(a), Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4066.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Sections 706 and 717 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (b), are classified to sections 2000e–5 and 2000e–16, respectively, of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.

Section 2 of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, referred to in subsec. (f)(2), is classified to section 2101 of Title 29, Labor.