alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### **CHAPTER 115—INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACQUISITION PILOT PROGRAM**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—CONDUCT OF PILOT PROGRAM

Sec.
11501.
Authority to conduct pilot program.
11502.
Evaluation criteria and plans.
11503.
Report.
11504.
Recommended legislation.
11505.
Rule of construction.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—SPECIFIC PILOT PROGRAM

[11521, 11522. Repealed.]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2002**—Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title VIII, §825(b)(3)(A), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2616, and Pub. L. 107–347, title II, §210(h)(3)(B), Dec. 17, 2002, 116 Stat. 2938, amended chapter heading identically, substituting "PROGRAM" for "PROGRAMS".

Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title VIII, §825(b)(3)(C), (D), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2616, and Pub. L. 107–347, title II, §210(h)(3)(D), (E), Dec. 17, 2002, 116 Stat. 2938, amended items for subchapters I and II identically, substituting "PROGRAM" for "PROGRAMS".

Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title VIII, §825(b)(3)(E), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2616, and Pub. L. 107–347, title II, §210(h)(3)(F), Dec. 17, 2002, 116 Stat. 2938, amended item 11501 identically, substituting "program" for "programs".

Pub. L. 107–347, title II, §210(h)(3)(G), Dec. 17, 2002, 116 Stat. 2939, struck out item 11521 "Share-in-savings pilot program", and directed redesignation of item 11522 as item 11521, which could not be executed because of repeal of item 11522 by Pub. L. 107–314, §825(b)(3)(F). See below.

Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title VIII, §825(b)(3)(F), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2616, struck out item 11522 "Solutions-based contracting pilot program".
NRC NEWS

 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-02-016 March 18, 2002

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: opa2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417 

 

NRC TO MEET WITH TVA OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS SAFETY

PERFORMANCE AT WATTS BAR NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Tennessee Valley Authority

officials on Wednesday, March 27, to discuss the results of NRC's annual assessment of safety

performance at the Watts Bar nuclear power plant.

The meeting will be held at 2:00 p.m. in the Andrew Johnson Room at the Best Western Motel,

1421 Murrayís Chapel Road in Sweetwater, Tennessee. The public is invited to observe the meeting,

and NRC officials will be available before the meeting is adjourned to answer any questions.

A letter sent from the NRCís Regional Administrator to TVA, which addresses plant safety

performance during the previous year and forms the basis of the meeting discussion, is available from

Region II Public Affairs or on the NRC web site at

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/wb_2001q4.pdf

Current information for the Watts Bar plant is available at

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/WB1/wb1_chart.html

###
### SUBCHAPTER I—ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIPS COOPERATION AND COORDINATION
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Irvin McNeal, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 12418;

Fourth District

August 15, 1974.

John F. McNichols and J. Daniel Stewart, both of State Appellate Defender’s Office, of Springfield, for appeHant.

Richard J. Doyle, State’s Attorney, of Danville (John R. McClory, Assistant State’s Attorney, of counsel), for the People.

Mr. JUSTICE TRAPP

delivered the opinion of the court:

Defendant appeals his conviction of burglary and theft entered upon jury verdicts. The court imposed sentence of 1 to 3 years.

The opinion of the supreme court in *People v. Ellis,*57 Ill.2d 127, 311 N.E.2d 98, controls the first issue raised upon appeal.

 Defendant correctly urges that the theft for which he was convicted was not independently motivated or otherwise separable from the acts constituting the burglary. Under such circumstances the conviction of theft must be reversed. *People v. Lilly,*56 Ill.2d 493, 309 N.E.2d 1; *People v. Whittington,*46 Ill.2d 405, 265 N.E.2d 679.

 The conviction of burglary and the sentence imposed are affirmed. The conviction for theft is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to issue an amended *mittimus.*

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded with directions.

SMITH, P. J., and SIMKINS, J., concur,
PUBLIC LAW 108–17—APR. 23, 2003 117 STAT. 623

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1505:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 149 (2003):

Mar. 31, considered and passed House.

Apr. 10, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 108–17

108th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2127 Beatties

Ford Road in Charlotte, North Carolina, as the ‘‘Jim Richardson Post Office’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

2127 Beatties Ford Road in Charlotte, North Carolina, shall be

known and designated as the ‘‘Jim Richardson Post Office’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Jim Richardson

Post Office’’.

Approved April 23, 2003.

Apr. 23, 2003

[H.R. 1505]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0688

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

BANNER LEE BOYD,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including November 16, 2020, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 8 2020

10/08/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0668
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE MARIA MEJIA-MORA, a.k.a.

Oscar Garcia-Vargas,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-70107

Agency No. A091-996-085

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 14, 2013** 

Before: SCHROEDER, GRABER, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Jose Maria Mejia-Mora, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to

reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

FILED

AUG 19 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-70107

review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen, Garcia v.

Holder, 621 F.3d 906, 912 (9th Cir. 2010), and we deny the petition for review. 

Mejia-Mora filed a timely motion to reopen with new, previously

unavailable, evidence of hardship to his United States citizen daughter to support

his application for cancellation of removal. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in

denying Mejia-Mora’s motion to reopen on the ground that the new evidence of his

daughter’s diagnosis with Bell’s palsy was insufficient to establish prima facie

eligibility for cancellation of removal. See id. at 912-913. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Federal Credit Union handbook**
 
1996 | 1999| 2002 | 2004| 2006
 
SuDoc Number:NCU 1.8:F 31/
Item Number:0526-B
CGP systemNumber:000470266
 
February 6, 2020
### Part B—Testing, Certification, Decertification, and Recertification of Voting System Hardware and Software
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of EMPS Research Corporation,
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Louis Naegle, Chief Executive Officer and Jennifer Preece, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



Date: November 14, 2003                          By:  /s/ Louis Naegle
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Louis Naegle,
                                                     Principal Executive Officer



Date: November 14, 2003                          By:  /s/ Jennifer Preece
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Jennifer Preece,
                                                     Principal Financial Officer
### In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

_________________________

No. 06

- 12

- 00092

- CR

______________________________

RONNY THOMAS TREVILION

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 196th Judicial District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court No. 27371

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

Ronny Thomas Trevilion, appellant, has filed with this Court a motion to dismiss his

appeal. The motion is signed by Trevilion and by his counsel in compliance with Rule 42.2(a) of

the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2(a). As authorized by Rule

42.2, we grant the motion. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

Bailey C. Moseley

Justice

Date Submitted: September 20, 2012

Date Decided: September 21, 2012

Do Not Publish
Exhibit 32.1    Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Western Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Brenda G. Gujral, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Steven P. Grimes, as Principal Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his or her knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Brenda G. GujralName:Brenda G. GujralChief Executive OfficerDate:May 15, 2007/s/ Steven P. GrimesName:Steven P. GrimesPrincipal Financial OfficerDate:May 15, 2007
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# 200700062 April 2013 Status Report on Petitions Under Title 10 of CFR Section 2.206.

Accession Number: ML13122A104

Date Released: Friday, May 24, 2013

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML13122A106 - April 2013 Report on the Status of Public Petitions under 10 CFR 2.206. (3 page(s), 5/23/2013)
    - ML13122A109 - Enclosure - April 2013 Report, on the Status of Public Petitions Under 10 CFR 2.206. (28 page(s), 5/23/2013)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-81021-CV-MIDDLEBROOKS/Matthewman

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT 

OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,

Plaintiff, 

and

STACEY MALO,

Intervenor Plaintiff,

v.

NICE SYSTEMS, INC.

Defendant.

____________________________________/

ORDER CLOSING CASE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Parties’ Joint Stipulations of Dismissal

with Prejudice (“Stipulations”), filed on August 19, 2021. (DE 162; DE 163). The Court 

congratulates the Parties on their amicable resolution of this matter and notes that pursuant to 

Anago Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, LLC, 677 F.3d 1272 (11th Cir. 2012), the Parties’ Stipulations

are self-executing and no order of the Court is required to dismiss this action. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that:

(1) The above-styled action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

 

Case 9:20-cv-81021-DMM Document 165 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/19/2021 Page 1 of 2
2

(2) The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE THIS CASE and DENY AS MOOT all pending 

motions.

SIGNED in Chambers in West Palm Beach, Florida, this 19th day of August, 2021.

 

___________________________________

DONALD M. MIDDLEBROOKS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to: Counsel of Record

Case 9:20-cv-81021-DMM Document 165 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/19/2021 Page 2 of 2
#### §§ 1034.131-1034.139 [Reserved]
Exhibit 99

Rio Minerals Limited

---

Mineral Exploration and Development910-475 Howe StreetVancouver, British ColumbiaCanada.  V6C 2B3
Email:  info@riominerals.comTelephone:  	(604) 671-2245Fax:		(604) 871-0231

---

June 20th, 2005

Mr. Jerry Jardine
New Pacific Ventures, Inc.
213-630 Roche Point Drive
North Vancouver, BC.  V7H 3A1



Dear Mr. Jardine:

A geographical survey and review of pertinent literature of the Riley 1-6 claims has been conducted.



I wish to advise the New Pacific Ventures Inc. that the Riley 1-6 claims host a deposit which is located within an area which is surrounded by other companies and because of it's location, the company will have to option properties from several other tenure holders which would render the project economically unviable for New Pacific Ventures.  This does not meet the requirements of New Pacific Ventures, and we recommend that New Pacific Ventures not continue the option agreement and return the property in good standing to the vendor, Cadre Capital Incorporated.



Respectfully Submitted:

/s/Andrew W. Molnar
Andrew W. Molnar
Rio Minerals Limited.









---

www.riominerals.com
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2523

To designate the United States courthouse located at 125 Bull Street in 

Savannah, Georgia, as the ‘‘Tomochichi United States Courthouse’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 19, 2003

Mr. BURNS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse located at 125 

Bull Street in Savannah, Georgia, as the ‘‘Tomochichi 

United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The United States courthouse located at 125 Bull 

5 Street in Savannah, Georgia, shall be known and des6 ignated as the ‘‘Tomochichi United States Courthouse’’. 

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

10 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed 
2

•HR 2523 IH 

1 to be a reference to the ‘‘Tomochichi United States Court2 house’’.

Æ
#### § 90.4 General.

This part provides a procedure for a governmental unit to request a challenge of a population estimate of the Census Bureau. The Census Bureau, upon receipt of the appropriate documentation, will attempt to resolve the estimate with the governmental unit.
### §10388. General regulatory authority

The Attorney General may promulgate regulations and guidelines to carry out this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §1708, as added Pub. L. 103–322, title I, §10003(a)(3), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1813.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3796dd–7 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-11-00869-CV

Elias J. De La Garza d/b/a Elias De La Garza Insurance, Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Insurance and Commissioner of Insurance Mike Geeslin, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-10-000643, HONORABLE RHONDA HURLEY, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On August 14, 2013, we granted appellant’s unopposed motion to stay proceedings

for 90 days and motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Appellant’s lead counsel died

unexpectedly. On December 11, 2013, appellant filed an unopposed motion to abate appeal because

appellant has been unable to secure new counsel. We grant the motion and abate the appeal. All

appellate deadlines will be tolled during the period of abatement. Appellant is directed to file either

a status report or a motion to reinstate by March 12, 2014.

__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Rose, and Goodwin

Abated

Filed: December 17, 2013
§ 990.43 Data collection. Trustees may conduct data collection and analyses that are reasonably related to Preassessment Phase activities. Data collection and analysis during the Preassessment Phase must be coordinated with response actions such that collection and analysis does not interfere with response actions. Trustees may collect and analyze the following types of data during the Preassessment Phase: ( a ) Data reasonably expected to be necessary to make a determination of jurisdiction under § 990.41 of this part, or a determination to conduct restoration planning under § 990.42 of this part;
( b ) Ephemeral data; and
( c ) Information needed to design or implement anticipated assessment procedures under subpart E of this part.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Jack Thomas Badgett v. Monte Land G'Sell, Individually, Monte Land G'Sell Revocable Living Trust a n d Monte Land G'Sell, TTEE

Appellate case number: 01

- 22

- 00587

- CV

Trial court case number: 2019

- 42337

Trial court: 113th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Jack Thomas Badgett, appeals from the trial court’s May 27, 2022 judgment after a bench trial and awarding damages to appellees, Monte Land G’Sell, Individually, Monte Land G’Sell Revocable Living Trust, and Monte Land G’Sell, TTEE. Pending before this Court is appellant’s motion to abate and order the trial court to prepare and file findings of fact and

conclusions of law.

Appellant conten ds that he filed a timely request for findings of fact and conclusions of law on June 9, 2022 and then a notice of past due findings and conclusions on July 7, 2022. Appellant asserts that the trial court has not filed findings and conclusions . The clerk ’s record filed on September 22, 2022 contains no findings of fact and conclusions of law.

“When properly and timely requested, the trial court has a mandatory duty to file findings

of fact and conclusions of law.” Glass v. Williamson

, 137 S.W.3d 114, 117

– 18 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 200 4

, no pet.). Appellant’s request for findings of fact and his notice of past due findings and conclusions were timely filed. See T EX

. R. C IV

. P. 296, 297

. Accordingly, we grant appellant’s motion. We abate the appeal and remand to the trial court for preparation of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial court shall forward a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings of fact and conclusions of law within 3 0 days

of the date of this order

.
It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

_____

/s/ Richard Hightowe r

________  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___ October 4, 2022

___
### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL PROVISIONS

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 97–35, title IX, §902(e)(1), (f)(1)(A), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 560, struck out heading "Part A—Definitions" before section 9411 and heading "Part B—State Administrative Responsibilities" before section 9421.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Martha Beck, Appellant, against Warden of the County Jail, Nassau County, et al., Respondents.

Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and Mac Crate, JJ., concur.
### SUBCHAPTER IX—SMART GRID
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 5, 2024

No. 04

- 23

- 00389

- CR

EX PARTE Juan Antonio VERASTEGUI ARANDA

From the County Court

, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10981CR

Honorable Susan D. Reed , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS Verastegui Aranda’s

appeal of the denial of his application for pretrial writ of habeas corpus for want of jurisdiction.

We further consider Verastegui Aranda’s appeal as a petition for writ of mandamus and DENY

his request for mandamus relief WITHOUT PREJUDICE

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a).

It is so ORDERED on June 5, 2024

.

_____________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 5th day of June, 2024

.

_____________________________ Luz Estrada , Chief Deputy Clerk
Commentary on Reactants
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 09, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, July 09, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19D0520. BRUCE D. TERRY v. THE STATE.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 12CR2766