alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2485

To limit the applicability of the annual updates to the allowance for State 

and other taxes in the tables used in the Federal Needs Analysis Methodology for the award year 2004–2005, published in the Federal Register 

on May 30, 2003. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 16, 2003

Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California (for himself, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. BISHOP of 

New York, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. OWENS, Mr. RYAN of Ohio, Mr. TIERNEY, 

Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. KIND, Mr. HOLT, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, and Ms. 

MCCOLLUM) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL

To limit the applicability of the annual updates to the allowance for State and other taxes in the tables used in 

the Federal Needs Analysis Methodology for the award 

year 2004–2005, published in the Federal Register on 

May 30, 2003.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring College Ac5 cess for all Americans Act’’. 
2

•HR 2485 IH 

1 SEC. 2. ALLOWANCE FOR STATE AND OTHER TAXES. 

2 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the an3 nual updates to the allowance for State and other taxes 

4 in the tables used in the Federal Needs Analysis Method5 ology to determine a student’s expected family contribu6 tion for the award year 2004–2005 under part F of title 

7 IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 

8 1087kk et seq.), published in the Federal Register on Fri9 day, May 30, 2003 (68 Fed. Reg. 32473), shall not apply 

10 to a student to the extent the updates will reduce the 

11 amount of Federal student assistance for which the stu12 dent is eligible.

Æ
No. II-09-003 January 16, 2009 

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 562-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 562-4416 

NRC SCHEDULES ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE WITH USEC 

ON OHIO GASEOUS DIFFUSION PLANT 

 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a predecisional enforcement 

conference in Atlanta on Thursday, Jan. 29 to discuss with officials of the United States 

Enrichment Corporation’s Gaseous Diffusion Plant in Portsmouth, Ohio, an apparent violation of 

NRC requirements associated with the movement of a liquid uranium hexafluoride cylinder. 

The meeting will begin at 10 a.m. (EST) at the NRC Region II office in Atlanta, located 

in the Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth St., S. W., Suite 23T85. The meeting will be 

open to observation by the public, and NRC officials will be available at its conclusion to answer 

questions from interested observers. 

NRC officials said that in September 2008 a plant employee discovered that a cylinder 

containing liquid uranium hexafluoride or UF6 had been moved to a storage pad without using 

either an approved overhead crane or cart as mandated by the facility’s safety requirements. An 

NRC inspection later found that USEC took immediate corrective actions and completed a 

thorough investigation after the event, which did not result in a mishap. 

No decision on enforcement action will be made at the meeting. NRC officials will 

review information presented by USEC at the meeting and reach a decision on appropriate 

regulatory action at a later date. 

The NRC inspection report on the issue is available through the Region II office or through the 

NRC Web page at www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html . The number to access the document is 

ML090050150. 

 

### 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
#### In the Matter of the Application of John E. Walsh, Jr., for Admission to Practice as an Attorney. (From the State of Pennsylvania.)

Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.
Search For Partners,  March 1, 1999

----

The Business Information Service for the Newly Independent States (BISNIS) is the U.S.government's clearinghouse for trade and investment information on the Newly IndependentStates of the former Soviet Union.
     BISNIS publishes SEARCH FOR PARTNERS to help U.S. companies find investmentopportunities in the expanding markets of the former Soviet Union.
     SEARCH FOR PARTNERS is distributed via this biweekly e-mail broadcast, and alimited selection of these leads are published in a monthly newsletter.  Previous e-mailbroadcasts are available through the BISNIS home page, at: http://www.mac.doc.gov.  Toreceive the biweekly report, e-mail BISNIS at [email protected] or call (202) 482-4655.     These opportunities are provided solely as an informational service and do not representan endorsement by the U.S. Department of Commerce.  Verification of these leads is theresponsibility of the reader.
##### 



RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD CERTIFICATE June 12, 2003 Exhibit 10.58 Maurice B. Tose
1299 Magnolia Ave.
Annapolis, MD 21403 USA Dear Maurice: Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the TeleCommunication Systems, Inc.
Amended & Restated 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (the Plan), you have been
granted a Restricted Stock Award (the Award) for the number of shares (each
an Award Share, and collectively, the Award Shares) of the Class A common
stock, par value $0.01 per share (the Common Stock) of TeleCommunication
Systems, Inc. (the Company) as outlined below. This Certificate constitutes
part of and is subject to the terms and provisions of the attached Restricted
Stock Grant Agreement (the Agreement) which is incorporated herein by
reference. Granted To: Maurice B. Tose     
(the Employee)
Grant Date: April 14, 2003
Award Shares Granted: 120,000
Vesting Schedule: 3-year Vesting 40,000 on 04/14/2004
40,000 on 04/14/2005
40,000 on 04/14/2006 By my signature below, I hereby acknowledge receipt of this Award granted on
the Grant Date shown above, which has been issued to me under the terms and
conditions of the Agreement and the Plan. I understand that I will forfeit all
unvested Award Shares at the close of business on my last day of employment at
TCS. I further acknowledge receipt of the Plan Prospectus and the latest annual
report or other SEC filing, and agree to be bound by all of the terms and
conditions of the Award, as evidenced in the Agreement, and the Plan. Signature: /s/ Maurice B. Tose
    
    Date: ________________Maurice B. Tose
 Note: If there are any discrepancies in the name or address shown above, please
make the appropriate corrections on this form.
Amendment to Amended & Restated Revolving Secured Line of Credit Promissory Note



 EXHIBIT 4.2 
 AMENDMENT TO 
 REVOLVING SECURED LINE OF CREDIT PROMISSORY NOTE 
 This Amendment entered into as of July 26, 2007 by and between the undersigned Borrower (the “Borrower”) and ATLANTIC BANK, a division of New York
Commercial Bank (the “Bank”). 
 WHEREAS, the Bank extended a revolving line of credit to the Borrower as evidenced by an Amended
and Restated Revolving Secured Line of Credit Promissory Note dated March 6, 2006 in the principal balance of Six Million Dollars ($6,000,000) and subsequently increased to Eight Million Dollars ($8,000,000) by amendment dated March 22,
2007 (the “Note”), (all documents and agreements executed by the Borrower in connection with the Note are hereinafter referred to as the “Loan Documents”), 
 WHEREAS, the Borrower has requested, and the Bank has agreed, to make certain amendments to the Note. 
 NOW THEREFORE, the parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows: 
  

	1.	Any term not defined herein shall have the same meaning as in the Note. 

  

	2.	Section 1. is amended by changing the “Maturity Date” to September 15, 2007. 

  

	3.	The Borrower hereby represents and warrants to the Bank that: 

  

	 	(a)	Each and every one of the representations and warranties set forth in the Loan Documents is true as of the date hereof and with the same effect as though made on the date hereof,
and is hereby incorporated herein in full by reference as if fully restated herein in its entirety. 

  

	 	(b)	No Default or Event of Default and no event or condition which, with the giving of notice or lapse of time or both, would constitute such a Default or Event of Default, now exists
or would exist. 

  

	4.	Except as set forth herein and amended and modified hereby, the Note and Loan Documents have not been amended or modified and remain in full force and effect.


  

	5.	Borrower waives any offset defense or counterclaim. Borrower may now have or may have in the future with regard to the Note and Loan Documents. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed and delivered on the date first written above. 
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW 







 Amendment to Amended and Restated Revolving Secured Line of Credit Promissory Note 
 As of My 26, 2007 
 Page -2- 
  

			
	 Borrower:

	
	 MEDALLION FUNDING CORP.

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Brian S. O’Leary

		 	Signature
	Print Name:	 	Brian S. O’Leary
	Title:	 	C.O.O.

  

			
	 Accepted By:
	 	 ATLANTIC BANK,
 a division of New York Commercial Bank



			
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Christopher Lynch

		 	Christopher Lynch
		 	Vice President
### Division F—Administrative Provisions
§ 705.7 Conduct of an investigation. ( a ) If the Department determines that it is appropriate to afford interested parties an opportunity to present information and advice relevant and material to an investigation, a public notice shall be published in the Federal Register soliciting from any interested party written comments, opinions, data, information or advice relative to the investigation. This material shall be submitted as directed within a reasonable time period to be specified in the notice. All material shall be submitted with 6 copies. In addition, public hearings may be held pursuant to § 705.8 of this part.
( b ) All requests and applications filed and all material submitted by interested parties, except information on material that is classified or determined to be confidential as provided in § 705.6 of this part, will be available for public inspection and copying in the Bureau of Industry and SecurityFreedom of Information Records Inspection Facility, Room H-4525, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230, in accordance with regulations published in part 4 of title 15, Code of Federal Regulations.
( c ) Further information may be requested by the Department from other sources through the use of questionnaires, correspondence, or other appropriate means.
( d ) The Department shall, as part of an investigation, seek information and advice from, and consult with, appropriate officers of the United States or their designees, as shall be determined. The Department shall also consult with the Secretary of Defense regarding the methodological and policy questions raised in the investigation. Upon the request of the Secretary, the Secretary of Defense shall provide the Secretary with an assessment of the defense requirements of the article in question. Communications received from agencies of the U.S. government or foreign governments will not be made available for public inspection.
( e ) Any request or application that is filed while an investigation is in progress, concerning imports of the same or related article and raising similar issues, may be consolidated with the request, application or motion that initiated the investigation.
[47 FR 14693, Apr. 6, 1982. Redesignated at 54 FR 601, Jan. 9, 1989 and amended at 54 FR 19355, May 5, 1989; 63 FR 31623, June 10, 1998]
II 

Calendar No. 343

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2533

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2003

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

OCTOBER 27, 2003

Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 10701 Abercorn Street in Savannah, Georgia, 

as the ‘‘J.C. Lewis, Jr. Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 10701 Abercorn Street in Savannah, Georgia, 

6 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘J.C. Lewis, Jr. 

7 Post Office Building’’. 
2

•HR 2533 RS 

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

5 to the ‘‘J.C. Lewis, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

Calendar No. 343

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2533

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 10701 Abercorn Street in 

Savannah, Georgia, as the ‘‘J.C. Lewis, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

OCTOBER 27, 2003

Reported without amendment
108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Mr. introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on

A BILL

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
### Part D—Rape Prevention and Control
<Page>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Genaissance Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Kevin Rakin, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                /s/ KEVIN RAKIN
                                                ------------------------------
                                                Kevin Rakin
Date: February 11, 2004                         Chief Executive Officer


    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Genaissance Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by
Genaissance Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Editorial Note on Subpart F of Part 9701
Editorial Note: At 73 FR 58435, Oct. 7, 2008, the application of subpart F to part 9701 was rescinded.

§ 9701.605 Initial service period. ( a ) DHS may establish an initial service period of 1 to 2 years for certain designated occupations in order for employees in such occupations to demonstrate appropriate competencies. DHS will establish standard policies for determining the applicability and the length of the ISP for specific occupations.
( b ) Employees must complete an ISP after selection for a designated DHS position in the competitive service before obtaining coverage under this subpart. All relevant prior Federal civilian service (including non-appropriated fund service), as determined by appropriate standards established by DHS, counts toward completion of this requirement.
( c ) An employee who is removed during a probationary, trial, or initial service period must be removed in accordance with 5 CFR 315.804 or 315.805, except for a preference eligible employee in the competitive service who has completed the first year of an ISP.
#### Duane P. Fox et al., Appellants, v. Village of Nassau, Respondent.

Present—Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gerald Ciccarelli, Appellant.

[822 NYS2d 186]

Appeal, by permission of a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Penny M. Wolfgang, J.), entered June 9, 2005. The order denied in part defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate the judgment convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree and attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree.

*1176It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by granting the motion in its entirety and vacating the judgment of conviction and as modified the order is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Erie County, for further proceedings on the indictment.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order denying in part his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate a 1989 judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree (Penal Law § 220.41 [1]) and attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree (§§ 110.00, 220.43 [1]). Contrary to the understanding of the parties and the court at the plea proceeding, attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree is a class A-I felony rather than a class A-II felony *(see*§ 110.05 [1]). Thus, Supreme Court properly concluded that the sentence of imprisonment of four years to life imposed on that count is illegal *(see*§ 70.00 [3] [a] [i]; *People v Gutierrez,*169 AD2d 882 [1991]). The court erred, however, in granting the motion only to the extent of vacating the sentence imposed on that count and permitting defendant to withdraw his plea of guilty on that count. “Where the plea bargain includes a sentence which is illegal because the minimum imposed is less than that required by law, . . . the proper remedy is to vacate the sentence and afford . . . defendant, having been denied the benefit of the bargain, the opportunity to withdraw the plea” *(People v Martin,*278 AD2d 743, 744 [2000]). Further, “[inasmuch as the entire sentence is ‘part and parcel of the plea bargain,’ it must be vacated in its entirety regardless of whether portions of the sentence are legal” *(People v Sheils,*288 AD2d 504, 505 [2001], *lv denied*97 NY2d 733 [2002], quoting *People v Sellers,*222 AD2d 941, 941 [1995]). We therefore modify the order by granting defendant’s motion in its entirety and vacating the judgment of conviction, and we remit the matter to Supreme Court for further proceedings on the indictment. In view of our determination, we do not address defendant’s remaining contentions. Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Scudder, Kehoe, Smith and Green, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 922
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

§ 922.32 Application requirements and procedures. ( a ) *Submitting applications.* Permit applications must be submitted by mail to the address listed in the subpart for the relevant national marine sanctuary or by electronic means as defined in the instructions for the ONMS permit application. Applicants proposing to conduct an activity in more than one national marine sanctuary should send the application to each NOAA office for the relevant national marine sanctuaries in which the activity is proposed.
( b ) *Application requirements.* All applications for a permit under this section must include the following information: ( 1 ) A detailed description of the proposed activity including: ( i ) A timetable for completion of the activity;
( ii ) A detailed description of the proposed location for the activity; and
( iii ) The equipment, personnel and methodology to be employed;
( 2 ) The qualifications and experience of all personnel;
( 3 ) The financial resources available to the applicant to conduct and complete the proposed activity and comply with any terms and conditions deemed necessary;
( 4 ) A statement as to why it is necessary to conduct the activity within a national marine sanctuary;
( 5 ) A description of the potential impacts of the activity, if any, on sanctuary resources and qualities;
( 6 ) A description of the benefits the conduct of the activity would have for the national marine sanctuary or national marine sanctuary system;
( 7 ) Copies of all other required licenses, permits, approvals, or other authorizations; and
( 8 ) Such other information as the Director may request or is specified in the relevant subpart.
( c ) *Additional information.* Upon receipt of an application, and as part of the evaluation of the permit application, the Director may: ( 1 ) Request such additional information as he or she deems necessary to act on the application;
( 2 ) Require a site visit; and
( 3 ) Seek the views of any persons.
( d ) *Time limit for submitting additional information.* Unless otherwise specified in writing by the Director, any information requested by the Director under paragraph (c) of this section must be received by the Director within 30 days of the postmark date of the request or, if email, the date of the email. Failure to provide such additional information may be deemed by the Director to constitute withdrawal of the permit application.
( e ) *Incomplete applications.* The Director may consider an application incomplete, and therefore may refuse to further consider the application, if the applicant: ( 1 ) Has failed to submit any of the information required under paragraph (b) of this section;
( 2 ) Has failed to submit any of the information requested by the Director under paragraph (c) of this section;
( 3 ) Has failed to pay any outstanding penalties that resulted from a violation of this part; or
( 4 ) Has failed to fully comply with a permit issued pursuant to this subpart.