alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS 

TO MEET APRIL 8-10 IN ROCKVILLE, MD. 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) will 

hold a public meeting April 8-10 in Rockville, Md., to discuss several issues of interest. Topics include: a 

review of interim staff guidance addressing post-combined license commitments for new reactors, a 

safety evaluation report with open items associated with the review of the U.S. Evolutionary Power 

Reactor design certification application, and the applicability of General Electric's methods to include a 

new fuel design (GNF2). 

The ACRS, a group of experienced technical experts, advises the Commission independently 

from the NRC staff on safety issues related to the licensing and operation of nuclear power plants. It also 

advises the Commission on issues in health physics and radiation protection. 

The meeting will be held in Room T2-B1 in the Two White Flint North building at NRC 

Headquarters at 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md. The sessions on Thursday, April 8, and Friday, 

April 9, will run from 8:30 a.m. to 7 p.m., and on Saturday, April 10, from 8:30 a.m. to 1 p.m. Portions of 

the meeting may be closed to discuss information that includes classified, proprietary, organizational or 

personnel matters. 

A complete agenda is available on the NRC’s Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/acrs/agenda/2010/. 

Anyone with questions or those wanting to make public statements during the meeting should 

contact Derek Widmayer, at (301) 415-7366. For video conferencing services, contact Theron Brown, at 

(301) 415-8066. 

### 

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand. 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

 

 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-055 March 30, 2010
#### § 990.60 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart is to provide a process for implementing restoration.
No. IV-13-003

Contact: Victor Dricks (817) 200-1128

 Lara Uselding (817) 200-1519

 

 Jan. 22, 2013

E-Mail: OPA4@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET PUBLIC TO DISCUSS SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING 

STATION STEAM GENERATOR ISSUES

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a public meeting on Feb. 12 to discuss the 

status of its review of Southern California Edison Co.’s (SCE) proposed plan for restarting San 

Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Unit 2. The plant, operated by SCE, is located in San 

Clemente, Calif.

The meeting will be held from 6-9 p.m. at the Capo Beach Church, 25975 Domingo Ave., 

in Capistrano Beach, Calif. The facility has seating for 1,100 persons and parking is free.

NRC staff will meet with the public to discuss the status of its inspection and technical 

evaluation of SCE’s response to the NRC Confirmatory Action Letter of March 27, concerning 

actions required to be taken by the company to address steam generator tube degradation at San 

Onofre. The company’s response to the Confirmatory Action Letter is available on the NRC 

website.

A leak in a Unit 3 steam generator tube on Jan. 31, 2012, led to the shutdown of that unit. 

The other reactor, Unit 2, was shut down for maintenance and refueling at the time. Subsequent 

inspections of the nearly new steam generators in both units found unexpected wear. Both units 

remain safely shut down and will not be permitted to restart until NRC has reasonable assurance 

they can be operated safely. 

The public will have an opportunity to ask questions of the NRC staff and Southern 

California Edison Co. officials and provide comments concerning the inspection and technical 

evaluation activities throughout the meeting.

“We want to provide the public with a status report on the NRC’s inspection activities at 

San Onofre and our ongoing evaluation of Southern California Edison’s proposal for restarting 

Unit 2,” said NRC Region IV Administrator Elmo E. Collins. “We encourage interested 

members of the public to attend the meeting, ask questions and provide comments to the NRC 

staff about our ongoing review.”

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV

 1600 E. Lamar Blvd.

 Arlington, TX 76011 - 4125

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov
The meeting will be webcast live at: http://video.nrc.gov . The video stream will begin 

about 5 p.m. PDT, but the audio stream will not start until the meeting begins. 

 A phone bridge is also available by calling: 1-888-790-2038 and entering passcode 47018. 

The webcast and phone bridge will be one-way only. Questions or comments can be 

submitted to the NRC staff after the meeting at: OPA4@nrc.gov .

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 22
- 00488
- CR

Troy Allen Dennis , Appellant

v. The State of Texas , Appellee

FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY NO. CR2018
- 048 , THE HONORABLE STEPHANIE BASCON , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellant Troy Allen Dennis was convicted by a jury of aggravated sexual assault of a child younger than six years of age and sentenced to life imprisonment. See Tex. Penal Code § 22.021(a)( 1)(B)(i), (f)(1). Appellant’s cou r t

- appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. Califo rnia by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrati n g why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967);
Garner v. State , 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 81

– 8 2 (1988). Appellant’s counsel has certified to this Court that s he s e nt copies of the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response, and provided a motion to assist appellant in obtaining the record. See2 Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319

– 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); see also Anders , 386 U.S. at
744. Appellant filed a pro se response on July 27 , 2023. We have conducted an independent review of the record

— including the record of the trial and sentencing proceedings below, appellate counsel’s brief, an d appellant’s pro se
response

— and find no reversible error. See Anders , 386 U.S. at 744; Garner , 300 S.W.3d at 766; Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 826

– 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We ag ree with counsel that the record presents no arguably meritorious gr ounds for review, and the appeal is frivolous. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. The trial court’s judgment of conviction is affirmed.

__________________________________________ Rosa Lopez Theofanis , Justice Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Tr iana and Theofanis Affirmed Filed: August 25, 2023 Do Not Publish
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL**

**EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Bekem Metals, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Yermek Kudabayev, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Date: November 14, 2008 | By:                     | /s/ Yermek Kudabayev |   |
|-------------------------|-------------------------|----------------------|--------|
|                    | Yermek Kudabayev        |
|                    | Chief Executive Officer |
(November 10, 1943.)

#### George A. Langan, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Onondaga Litholite Company, Appellant, v. First Trust & Deposit Company et al., Respondents.

*1057Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

NOTICE

Appellate case name: Raymond C. Clark v. Wendy Jean Morrow

Appellate case number: 01-15-00615-CV

Trial court case number: 68321-D

Trial court: 300th District Court of Brazoria County

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(c), the district clerk is directed to file 

a supplemental clerk’s record containing:

 “Order in Suit to Modify Parent-Child Relationship,” signed on February 20, 

2015.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c)(1).

The supplemental clerk’s record shall be filed in the First Court of Appeals within 14

days of the date of this notice.

The cost of preparing this record will be assessed as part of the costs of this appeal upon 

issuance of this Court’s judgment.

Clerk’s Signature: 

Date: August 13, 2015
NRC PUBLISHES ANNUAL SECURITY INSPECTION REPORT TO CONGRESS

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has made available to the public an 

unclassified version of an annual report to Congress outlining the previous year’s security 

inspection program. The report is required under the Energy Policy Act of 2005.

The report covers the NRC’s security inspection program, including force-on-force 

exercises, for commercial nuclear power reactors and Category I fuel cycle facilities for calendar 

year 2011.

“We are pleased to provide this report to Congress, which demonstrates the NRC’s 

ongoing commitment to ensuring nuclear power facilities in this country operate securely,” said 

NRC Chairman Allison Macfarlane. “This report reflects the rigor of our regulations, the 

expertise of our inspectors and the responsiveness of our licensees.”

According to the report, the NRC conducted 193 baseline security inspections at 

commercial nuclear power plants and 24 force-on-force inspections, which use a well-trained 

mock adversary force to test a facility’s security posture. These inspections identified 151 

findings, of which 140 findings were of very low security significance (or a green finding) and 

11 were of violations considered to be of more than “very low” significance, although the 

specifics of the severity violations are not public. By comparison, there were 197 inspections 

(172 baseline and 25 force-on-force) and 144 findings in 2010, of which 133 were of very low 

security significance and 11 were of greater than very low security significance. 

Whenever a finding is identified during a security inspection, the NRC ensures the issue 

is corrected immediately or compensatory measures are put in place, if necessary. Details of 

security findings are considered sensitive and not released to the public. 

The public version of the report can be found on the NRC Website. 

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 12-094 August 21, 2012
No: 13-057 July 2, 2013

CONTACT: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200 

NRC Cites Duke Energy for 

Fire Protection Violation at Oconee Nuclear Power Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a Notice of Violation and a Confirmatory

Order to Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC for failing to implement a license condition on fire protection at 

its Oconee nuclear power plant in South Carolina. Oconee has three pressurized water reactors and is 

located about 30 miles west of Greenville, S.C. 

Duke had committed through a license condition to complete installation and implementation of 

the protected service water system at Oconee by Jan. 1, 2013, as part of transitioning the plant’s fire 

protection program to the National Fire Protection Association Standard No. 805 under NRC 

regulations. When Duke notified the NRC that it would miss the deadline and requested an extension, 

the NRC denied the request.

Failure to complete the installation of the protected service water system is a significant 

regulatory concern to the NRC because proper installation would improve safety and reduce risk at the 

plant. Duke has increased compensatory fire protection measures that further ensure adequate safety at 

the plant while completing the upgrades.

NRC staff held a pre-decisional enforcement conference with Duke officials in March. During 

that session and a subsequent meeting, Duke agreed to a schedule that will complete Oconee’s 

transition to the NFPA 805 standard by 2016, with several intermediate milestones that will provide 

safety enhancements before that date. Those milestones are spelled out in the Confirmatory Order 

issued July 1, and are now regulatory requirements as part of the Oconee operating license.

The NRC staff determined that Duke’s violation of its NFPA 805 license conditions was a 

Severity Level III violation, the second-lowest of four severity levels in the NRC enforcement process. 

Because Duke took corrective actions to commit additional resources and improve management of the 

project, implement compensatory measures and establish a new timeline for completing the transition

to the NFPA 805 standard, no civil penalty will be assessed at this time. A civil penalty will be 

considered if Duke misses milestones established in the Confirmatory Order.
§ 1.84 Draft environmental impact statements: Availability and comment. Except for proposals for legislation, environmental impact statements shall be prepared in two stages: Draft statement and final statement. ( a ) *Proposed rules or guides.* ( 1 ) An environmental impact statement, if deemed necessary, shall be in draft form at the time a proposed rule or guide is published in the Federal Register and shall accompany the proposal throughout the decisionmaking process.
( 2 ) The major decision points with respect to rules and guides are: ( i ) Preliminary formulation of a staff proposal;
( ii ) The time the proposal is initially published in the Federal Register as a Commission proposal;
( iii ) Presiding officer's report (in trade regulation rule proceedings);
( iv ) Submission to the Commission of the staff report or recommendation for final action on the proposed guide or rule;
( v ) Final decision by the Commission. The decision on whether or not to prepare an environmental impact statement should occur at point (a)(2)(i) of this section. The publication of any draft impact statement should occur at point (a)(2)(ii) of this section. The publication of the final environmental impact statement should occur at point (a)(2)(iv) of this section.
( b ) *Legislative proposals.* In legislative matters, a legislative environmental impact statement shall be prepared in accordance with CEQ Regulation (40 CFR 1506.8).
( c ) In rule or guide proceedings the draft environmental impact statement shall be prepared in accordance with CEQ Regulation (40 CFR 1502.9) and shall be placed in the public record to which it pertains; in legislative matters, the legislative impact statement shall be placed in a public record to be established, containing the legislative report to which it pertains; these will be available to the public through the Office of the Secretary and will be published in full with the appropriate proposed rule, guide, or legislative report; such statements shall also be filed with the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Office of Environmental Review (CEQ Regulation (40 CFR 1506.9)) for listing in the weekly Federal Register Notice of draft environmental impact statements, and shall be circulated, in accordance with CEQ Regulations (40 CFR 1502.19, 1506.6) to appropriate federal, state and local agencies.
( d ) Forty-five (45) days will be allowed for comment on the draft environmental impact statement, calculated from the date of publication in the EPA's weekly Federal Register list of draft environmental impact statements. The Commission may in its discretion grant such longer period as the complexity of the issues may warrant.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-13-0069- Denial of Petition for Rulemaking (PRM-32-7)

Accession Number: ML13093A453

Date Released: Tuesday, September 17, 2013

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML13094A109 - SECY-13-0069 - Denial of Petition for Rulemaking (PRM-32-7) (3 page(s), 6/21/2013)
    - ML13094A106 - SECY-13-0069 - Enclosure 1: Federal Register Notice: Compatibility of Generally Licensed and Exempt Devices PRM-32-7 (10 page(s), 6/21/2013)
    - ML13094A108 - SECY-13-0069 - Enclosure 2: Letter to the Petitioner Denial Letter PRM-32-7 (2 page(s), 6/21/2013)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
### SUBCHAPTER II–B—CHILD CARE AND DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Subchapter is based on subchapter C of chapter 8 of subtitle A of title VI of Pub. L. 97–35, as added by Pub. L. 101–508, title V, §5082(2), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–236, and amended by Pub. L. 102–401, §3(a), Oct. 7, 1992, 106 Stat. 1959; Pub. L. 102–586, §8(c)(1), Nov. 4, 1992, 106 Stat. 5036.
#### Effie FULLER, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

December 19, 1947.

Dinkle & Fannin for appellant.

Eldon S. Dummit, Attorney General, and H. K. Spear, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Appeal from Boyd Circuit Court; Watt M. Prichard, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

$100 fine and 30 days in jail for unlawfully selling intoxicating liquor in local option territory.

Appeal denied; Judgment affirmed.
§ 906.6 Ex parte communications. ( a ) *Ex parte communication* means any oral or written communication about the merits of a pending appeal between one party and the NAO with respect to which reasonable prior notice to all parties is not given. However, ex parte communication does not include inquiries regarding procedures, scheduling, and status.
( b ) Ex parte communication is not permissible unless all parties have been given reasonable notice and an opportunity to participate in the communication.
( c ) If NAO receives an ex parte communication, NAO shall document the communication and any responses thereto in the NAO case record. If the ex parte communication was in writing, NAO shall include a copy of the communication in the NAO case record. If the ex parte communication was oral, NAO shall prepare a memorandum stating the substance of the oral communication, and include the memorandum in the NAO case record. NAO will provide copies of any such materials included in the NAO case record under this paragraph to the parties.
( d ) NAO may require a party to show cause why such party's claim or interest in the appeal should not be dismissed, denied, disregarded, or otherwise adversely affected because of an ex parte communication.
( e ) NAO may suspend this section during an alternative dispute resolution process established by regulation or agency policy.
( f ) Communication with NAO, including appellate officers, concerning procedures, scheduling, and status is permissible.
NRC FY 2012 BUDGET BRIEFING SLIDES AVAILABLE ON WEBSITE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has made available slides on its proposed Fiscal 

Year 2012 budget on the website at www.nrc.gov under Highlights in the middle of the page 

and under $ Budget and Performance in the bottom left corner. These slides that summarize 

the $1.04 billion budget request will be used to brief the media today. Because the NRC recovers 

approximately 90 percent of its budget through fees, the agency’s net budget authority is $128.6 

million.

The NRC is submitting to Congress its FY 2012 budget request for $1,038.1 million, 

representing a decrease of $28.7 million below the agency’s FY 2010 budget. The major changes 

include:

• A $20.5 million decline in reduced demand for operating reactors licensing 

activities;

• A $12.5 million increase for expected construction of two new reactors and 

additional advance reactor support;

• A zeroing out of resources for the orderly closeout of the Yucca Mountain HighLevel Waste repository review due to completion prior to FY2012; and

• An $8.3 million increase in spent nuclear fuel storage and transportation 

activities.

For the major program areas, NRC is requesting $800.8 million for its work in Nuclear 

Reactor Safety, $226.5 million for Nuclear Materials and Waste Safety and $10.9 million for 

Inspector General activities. 

The Congressional Budget Justification for FY 2012 (NUREG-1100, volume 27) will be 

made available on the NRCs website and announced separately.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-025 February 14, 2011