alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 990.27 Use of assessment procedures. ( a ) *Standards for assessment procedures.* Any procedures used pursuant to this part must comply with all of the following standards if they are to be in accordance with this part: ( 1 ) The procedure must be capable of providing assessment information of use in determining the type and scale of restoration appropriate for a particular injury;
( 2 ) The additional cost of a more complex procedure must be reasonably related to the expected increase in the quantity and/or quality of relevant information provided by the more complex procedure; and
( 3 ) The procedure must be reliable and valid for the particular incident.
( b ) *Assessment procedures available.* ( 1 ) The range of assessment procedures available to trustees includes, but is not limited to: ( i ) Procedures conducted in the field;
( ii ) Procedures conducted in the laboratory;
( iii ) Model-based procedures, including type A procedures identified in 43 CFR part 11, subpart D, and compensation formulas/schedules; and
( iv ) Literature-based procedures.
( 2 ) Trustees may use the assessment procedures in paragraph (b)(1) of this section alone, or in any combination, provided that the standards in paragraph (a) of this section are met, and there is no double recovery.
( c ) *Selecting assessment procedures.* ( 1 ) When selecting assessment procedures, trustees must consider, at a minimum: ( i ) The range of procedures available under paragraph (b) of this section;
( ii ) The time and cost necessary to implement the procedures;
( iii ) The potential nature, degree, and spatial and temporal extent of the injury;
( iv ) The potential restoration actions for the injury; and
( v ) The relevance and adequacy of information generated by the procedures to meet information requirements of restoration planning.
( 2 ) If a range of assessment procedures providing the same type and quality of information is available, the most cost-effective procedure must be used.
§ 930.79 Effect of State agency concurrence. ( a ) If the State agency issues a concurrence or is conclusively presumed to concur with the person's consistency certification, the person will not be required to submit additional consistency certifications and supporting information for State agency review at the time federal applications are actually filed for the federal licenses or permits to which such concurrence applies.
( b ) Unless the State agency indicates otherwise, copies of federal license or permit applications for activities described in detail in an OCS plan which has received State agency concurrence shall be sent by the person to the State agency to allow the State agency to monitor the activities. Confidential and proprietary material within such applications may be deleted.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Earl Adams, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 116]

Motion for writ of error coram nobis denied. Present — Scudder, J.P., Smith, Green and Pine, JJ.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2583

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to allow remarried widows, 

widowers, and surviving divorced spouses to become or remain entitled 

to widow’s or widower’s insurance benefits if the prior marriage was 

for at least 10 years. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 24, 2003

Mr. DUNCAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to allow remarried widows, widowers, and surviving divorced spouses 

to become or remain entitled to widow’s or widower’s 

insurance benefits if the prior marriage was for at least 

10 years.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Remarried Widows’ 

5 and Widowers’ Benefits Act of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 2583 IH 

1 SEC. 2. ENTITLEMENT OF REMARRIED WIDOWS, WID2 OWERS, AND SURVIVING DIVORCED SPOUSES 

3 TO WIDOW’S AND WIDOWER’S INSURANCE 

4 BENEFITS. 

5 (a) WIDOW’S INSURANCE BENEFITS.—Section 

6 202(e)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 402(e)(3)) 

7 is amended—

8 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

9 the end; 

10 (2) in subparagraph (B), by adding ‘‘or’’ at the 

11 end; and 

12 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the fol13 lowing new subparagraph: 

14 ‘‘(C) a widow or surviving divorced wife who 

15 was married to the fully insured individual referred 

16 to in paragraph (1) for at least 10 years marries,’’. 

17 (b) WIDOWER’S INSURANCE BENEFITS.—Section 

18 202(f)(4) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 402(f)(4)) 

19 is amended—

20 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

21 the end; 

22 (2) in subparagraph (B), by adding ‘‘or’’ at the 

23 end; and 

24 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the fol25 lowing new subparagraph: 
3

•HR 2583 IH 

1 ‘‘(C) a widower or surviving divorced husband 

2 who was married to the fully insured individual re3 ferred to in paragraph (1) for at least 10 years mar4 ries,’’. 

5 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

6 The amendments made by this Act shall apply with 

7 respect to remarriages occurring on or after the date of 

8 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
### §605. Payment of costs

(a) Use of Acquisition Services Fund To Cover Costs.—The Acquisition Services Fund provided for in section 321 of this title is available for use by or under the direction and control of the Administrator of General Services to pay the costs of carrying out section 602 of this title, including the cost of purchasing or renting motor vehicles and related equipment and supplies.

(b) Setting Prices To Recover Costs.—

(1) In general.—The Administrator shall set prices for furnishing motor vehicles and related services under section 602 of this title. Prices shall be set to recover, so far as practicable, all costs of carrying out section 602 of this title.

(2) Increment for replacement cost.—In the Administrator's discretion, prices may include an increment for the estimated replacement cost of motor vehicles and related equipment and supplies. Notwithstanding section 321(f) of this title, the increment may be retained as a part of the capital of the Acquisition Services Fund but is available only to replace motor vehicles and related equipment and supplies.

(c) Accounting Method.—The purchase price of motor vehicles and related equipment, and any increment for estimated replacement cost, shall be recovered only through charges for the cost of amortization. Costs shall be determined, and financial reports prepared, in accordance with the accrual accounting method.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1123; Pub. L. 109–313, §3(h)(6), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1736.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 605 | 40:491(d). | June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title II, §211(d), as added Sept. 5, 1950, ch. 849, §5(c), 64 Stat. 583; Sept. 1, 1954, ch. 1211, §2, 68 Stat. 1127; Pub. L. 95–506, Oct. 24, 1978, 92 Stat. 1756. |

Section

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 109–313, §3(h)(6)(A), substituted "Acquisition Services Fund" for "General Supply Fund" in heading and text.

Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 109–313, §3(h)(6)(B), substituted "321(f)" for "321(f)(1)" and "Acquisition Services Fund" for "General Supply Fund".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2006 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 109–313 effective 60 days after Oct. 6, 2006, see section 6 of Pub. L. 109–313, set out as a note under section 5316 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
# L_2019238EN.01000102.xml

| 16.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 238/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 238/1

---

Information concerning the entry into force of Amendment 1 to the Agreement on cooperation in the regulation of civil aviation safety between the European Community and the United States of America

Amendment 1 to the Agreement on cooperation in the regulation of civil aviation safety between the European Community and the United States of America, signed in Brussels on 13 December 2017, entered into force on 1 August 2019, in accordance with Article 3 of the Agreement, as the last notification was deposited on 14 June 2019.

---
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR
RULE 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Salomon Sredni, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of TradeStation Group, Inc.; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |  |  |     |  |                        
|-------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|April 29, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Salomon Sredni     
|Date           |  |  |  |     |  | Salomon Sredni         
|               |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
§ 930.152 Application. ( a ) This subpart applies to federal actions having interstate coastal effects, and supplements the relevant requirements contained in 15 CFR part 930, subparts C (Consistency for Federal Agency Activities), D (Consistency for Activities Requiring a Federal License or Permit), E (Consistency for OCS Exploration, Development and Production Activities) and F (Consistency for Federal Assistance to State and Local Governments). Except as otherwise provided by this subpart, the requirements of other relevant subparts of part 930 apply to activities having interstate coastal effects.
( b ) Federal consistency is a requirement on federal actions affecting any coastal use or resource of a State with a federally-approved management program, regardless of the activities' locations (including States without a federally approved management program). The federal consistency requirement does not alter a coastal State's jurisdiction. The federal consistency requirement does not give States the authority to review the application of laws, regulations, or policies of any other State. Rather, the Act allows a management program to review federal actions and may preclude federal action as a result of a State objection, even if the objecting State is not the State in which the activity will occur. Such objections to interstate activities under subparts D, E and F may be overridden by the Secretary pursuant to subpart H of this part.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 19

- 00286

- CR

Michael Lee Arnett v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 347th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Cause No. 19FC

- 1199

- H

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this ca use on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal
DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. July 3, 2019
# jfourti) Court of ^pEalsi ^an santonto, tiexas; October 2,2013 No. 04-13-00600-CR Marcel Edgar REYES, Appellant

V. The STATE ofTexas, Appellee From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013CR5449W 

### Honorable Ray Olivarri, Judge Presiding ORDER 

### In accordance with this court's opinion ofthis date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. It is so ORDERED on October 2, 2013. 

# \Shnp —, C^heri^ Stone, ChiefJustice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hancj and affixed the seal ofthe said 

### court on^siSn^jday ofOctober, 2013. OF Clerk

""iiimmw''
#### Union Free School District No. 14 of Town of Hempstead, Nassau County, Respondent, v. Village of Hewlett Bay Park et al., Appellants.

The Village Law empowers villages to adopt zoning ordinances for “the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals, or the general welfare of the community” (§ 175). Any regulations adopted must be designed to facilitate “ the adequate provision of * * * schools ” (§ 177). The Constitution of the State imposes the duty upon the Legislature to provide a system of free public education, and reserves to the Legislature full power in relation to the “ maintenance, support or administration ” of the system, notwithstanding the powers conferred by the Home Rule provisions of the Constitution (art. XI; art. IX, § 13, subd. B). *(Matter of Bethlehem*
      *619
      *Union Free School*v. *Wilson,*303 N. Y. 107; *People ex rel. Elkind*v. *Rosenblum,*184 Misc. 916.) In compliance with the direction of the Constitution, the Education Law has been enacted, and it imposes upon school districts or the boards of education therein the duty to locate schools and empowers them to secure sites by condemnation, if necessary (Education Law, §§ 404, 405). Plans for buildings such as the respondent has contracted to build must be and have been approved by the Commissioner of Education (§ 408), who is empowered to hear appeals from the actions of school districts (§ 310), and who cannot approve the plans in the absence of specific provision for the health and safety of the children (§§ 408, 409). In the absence of a specific grant of power, the defendant village cannot by a zoning regulation prevent the location of a school within its borders and thereby prohibit the performance by the school district of the duty imposed upon it by law. *(People ex rel. Elkind*v. *Rosenblum,*184 Misc. 916, *supra;*cf. *Jewish Consumptives’ Relief Soc.*v. *Town of Woodbury,*230 App. Div. 228, affd. 256 N. Y. 619.) Present — Johnston, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ. [See *post,*p. 746.]
Editorial Note on Part 922
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

§ 922.182 Definitions. ( a ) *Acts* means the Hawaiian Islands National Marine Sanctuary Act (HINMSA; sections 2301-2307 of Pub. L. 102-587), and the National Marine Sanctuaries Act (NMSA; also known as Title III of the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act (MPRSA), as amended, 16 U.S.C. 1431 *et seq.*). *Adverse impact* means an impact that independently or cumulatively damages, diminishes, degrades, impairs, destroys, or otherwise harms.
*Alteration of the seabed* means drilling into, dredging, or otherwise altering a natural physical characteristic of the seabed of the Sanctuary; or constructing, placing, or abandoning any structure, material, or other matter on the seabed of the Sanctuary.
*Habitat* means those areas that provide space for individual and population growth and normal behavior of humpback whales, and include sites used for reproductive activities, including breeding, calving and nursing.
*Military activities* means those military activities conducted by or under the auspices of the Department of Defense and any combined military activities carried out by the Department of Defense and the military forces of a foreign nation.
*Sanctuary* means the Hawaiian Islands Humpback Whale National Marine Sanctuary.
*Sanctuary resource* means any humpback whale, or the humpback whale's habitat within the Sanctuary.
*Shoreline* means the upper reaches of the wash of the waves, other than storm or seismic waves, at high tide during the season of the year in which the highest wash of the waves occurs, usually evidenced by the edge of vegetation growth, or the upper limit of debris left by the wash of the waves.
*Take or taking a humpback whale* means to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, collect or injure a humpback whale, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct. The term includes, but is not limited to, any of the following activities: collecting any dead or injured humpback whale, or any part thereof; restraining or detaining any humpback whale, or any part thereof, no matter how temporarily; tagging any humpback whale; operating a vessel or aircraft or doing any other act that results in the disturbing or molesting of any humpback whale.
( b ) Other terms appearing in the regulations in this subpart are defined at 15 CFR 922.11, and/or in the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. 1401 *et seq.,* and 16 U.S.C. 1431 *et seq.*
[64 FR 66570, Nov. 29, 1999, as amended at 88 FR 970, Jan. 6, 2023]
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 21 (Thursday, January 31, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 772]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00359]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Biobehavioral and Behavioral Processes 
Integrated Review Group; Biobehavioral Regulation, Learning and 
Ethology Study Section.
    Date: February 21-22, 2019.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: The William F. Bolger Center, 9600 Newbridge Drive, 
Potomac, MD 20854.
    Contact Person: Unja Hayes, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
National Institutes of Health, Center for Scientific Review, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, md 20892, 301-827-6830, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#86f3e8ece7a8eee7ffe3f5c6e8efeea8e1e9f0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="394c575358175158405c4a79575051175e564f">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 25, 2019.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-00359 Filed 1-30-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 1500.103 Instructions. The agent(s) shall conduct the referendum, in the manner provided in this subpart, under the supervision of the Secretary. The Secretary may prescribe additional instructions, consistent with the provisions of this subpart, to govern the procedure to be followed by the agent(s). Such agent(s) shall: ( a ) Determine the period during which voters may cast ballots;
( b ) Provide notification to allow interested voters to register in advance of the referendum period. The Department will restrict the information requested to that information needed to ensure eligibility of request or to participate in the referendum. Types of information will include name, contact information (address, phone number, email), status as a manufacturer of concrete masonry units, affirmation of having manufactured concrete masonry units within 180 days prior to the beginning of the referendum period, the number of machine cavities in operation, their Employer Identification Number, and similar identifying information;
( c ) Provide ballots and related material to voters for use in the referendum. The ballot shall provide for recording essential information, including information needed for ascertaining whether the person voting, or on whose behalf the vote is cast, is an eligible voter. The Department will restrict the information requested to that information needed to determine a voter's eligibility. Information will include the name and address of the manufacturer, status as a manufacturer of concrete masonry units, affirmation that they have manufactured concrete masonry units within 180 days of the beginning of the referendum period, manufacturer Employer Identification Number, the number of machine cavities the manufacturer has in operation, and similar verification information;
( d ) Give reasonable public notice of the referendum: ( 1 ) By using available media or public information sources, without incurring advertising expense, to publicize the dates, method of voting, eligibility requirements, and other pertinent information. Such sources of publicity may include, but are not limited to webinars and other such media vehicles; and
( 2 ) By such other means as the agent may deem advisable;
( e ) Send to eligible manufacturers whose names and addresses are known to the agent, the instructions on voting, a ballot, and a summary of the terms and conditions of the proposed order;
( f ) At the end of the referendum period, collect, open, number, and review the ballots and tabulate the results in the presence of the Lead Executive authorized to monitor the referendum process;
( g ) Prepare a report on the referendum; and
( h ) Announce the results to the public.
April 21, 2016

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

LUCIDALIA CHAVEZ, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00481-CV V.

WALTER CHAVEZ, Appellee

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment, signed, March 17, 2014, was heard 

on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in 

the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED. We order 

appellant, Lucidalia Chavez, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. We further 

order this decision certified below for observance.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Thomas C. Duffy, Respondent, against Arthur I. Levine et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Present — Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Santry and Bergan, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 735.]
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# September 2012 2.206 Status Report.

Accession Number: ML12271A305

Date Released: Wednesday, October 10, 2012

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML12271A309 - September 2012 2.206 Report on The Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of The Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206. (3 page(s), 10/9/2012)
    - ML12271A313 - Enclosure - September 2012 2.206 Report on The Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of The Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206. (25 page(s), 10/9/2012)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer