alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 997.15 Audit and decertification. ( a ) NOAA may audit an RCOS that it has certified to ensure compliance with the IOOC certification criteria and these regulations. NOAA will notify the RCOS of its intent to conduct an audit and will coordinate with the RCOS on the audit schedule and process.
( b ) NOAA may decertify an RCOS. In general, an RCOS may be decertified when: ( 1 ) The results of an audit indicate that the RCOS no longer satisfies the requirements under which it was certified; or
( 2 ) Other relevant reasons for decertification become apparent.
( c ) NOAA's intent to decertify an RCOS, along with the identification of a specific deficiency(ies) and a recommended corrective action(s), shall be included in a written notification to the RICE. After receiving NOAA's written notification, an RCOS shall have up to 45 calendar days to request in writing that NOAA reconsider its intent to decertify the RCOS. The RCOS's request for reconsideration shall contain sufficient information for NOAA to determine whether to grant the request for reconsideration. Alternatively, the RCOS may correct the deficiency(ies) identified by NOAA within 45 calendar days, notify NOAA in writing of the corrective action(s) taken, and provide sufficient evidence for NOAA to determine the correctness and effectiveness of the corrective action(s) taken.
( d ) If an RCOS submits to NOAA a written request for reconsideration or a written assertion that the identified deficiency(ies) has been corrected, NOAA shall have up to 60 calendar days after receipt of the request or assertion, to review the request for reconsideration or the assertion of corrective action. NOAA's decision, along with the reason for its decision, shall be delivered to the applicant via letter delivered by first class mail and by electronic means.
( e ) Upon decertification, an RCOS shall no longer be incorporated into the System.
( f ) An RCOS may act voluntarily to terminate its certification at any time by notifying NOAA in writing of its desire to do so. Upon receipt of the notification by NOAA, the RICE will no longer be incorporated into the System.
Date: February 10, 2014

California Environmental Protection Agency

AIR RESOURCES BOARD

Enclosure A

Rules t hat we re Adopted or Amended by the Following

Air Pollution Control and Air Quality Management Districts

and a re Submitted a s Revisions to the

State of California Implementation Plan for Achieving

and Maintaining the National Ambient Air Quality Standards

District Rule

Number Date Adopted

or

Amended Title

Butte County

AQMD 434 4/25/13 Emissions Statements

(adopted)

Feather River

AQMD 3.14 8/1/11 Surface Preparation and

Clean

- up solvents (amended)

Feather River

AQMD 3.15 11/13/02 Architectural Coatings

(amended)

Feather River

AQMD 3.19 8/1/11 Vehicle and Mobile

Equipment Coating

Operations (amended)

Feather River

AQMD 3.20 8/1/11 Wood Products Coating

Operation (amended)

Feather River

AQMD 3.21 6/5/06 Industrial, Institutional, and

Commercial Boilers, Steam

Generators, and Process

Heaters (adopted)California Environmental Protection Agency

AIR RESOURCES BOARD

Enclosure A (continued)

Rules t hat w ere Adopte d or Amended by the Following

Air Pollution Control and Air Quality Management Districts

and a re Submitted As Revisions to the

State of California Implementation Plan for Achieving

and Maintaining the National Ambient Air Quality Standards

District Rul e

Number Date Adopted

or Amended Title

2 Plac er County

APCD 206 4/11/13 Incinerator Burning

(amended)

Placer County

APCD 213 2/21/13 Gasoline Transfer into

Stationary Storage

Containers (adopted)

Placer County

APCD 214 2/21/13 Transfer of Gasoline into

Vehicle Fuel Tanks

(amended)

San Joaquin Val ley

APCD 1020 2/21/13 Definitions (amended)

Santa Barbara

County APCD 810 6/20/13 Prevention of Significant

Deterioration (PSD)

(amended)California Environmental Protection Agency

AIR RESOURCES BOARD

Enclosure A (continued)

Rules t hat w ere Adopte d or Amended by the Following

Air Pollution Control and Air Quality Management Districts

and a re Submitted As Revisions to the

State of California Implementation Plan for Achieving

and Maintaining the National Ambient Air Quality Standards

District Rul e

Number Date Adopted

or Amended Title

3 South Coast AQMD 1114 5/3/13 Petroleum refinery Coking

Operations (adopted)

Yolo Solano AQMD 1.1 5/8/13 General Pr ovisions and

Definitions (amended)

Yolo Solano AQMD 2.31 5/8/13 Solvent Cleaning and

Degreasing (amended)
#### § 990.21 Relationship to the NCP.

This part provides procedures by which trustees may determine appropriate restoration of injured natural resources and services, where such injuries are not fully addressed by response actions. Response actions and the coordination with damage assessment activities are conducted pursuant to the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP), 40 CFR part 300.
### Part C—Other Support for State and Local Housing Strategies
|  |  | Clearinghouse Publications- Discovery and Viewing of Distributed       Spatial Data: The OpenMap Testbed  presented at EO/GEO'98, February       1998.    Distributed Mapping Scenario for the       WWW Mapping Special Interest Group of the OpenGIS Consortium.DOCUMENT.AML
 --       An Interim Solution for the Collection of Metadata in ARC/INFO, by Doug       Nebert, ESRI Conference, May 1995.   
- Draft Response to the OpenGIS Services Working       Group RFI on Catalog Service Interfaces  Fact Sheet on the National Geospatial Data   Clearinghouse.Information Architecture of a   Clearinghouse
, by Doug Nebert, WWW Conference, May 1996   
- June 1996 Essay on Future GIS and Data   Interoperability and Accessibility  Serving Digital Map Information through the   WWW and Wide-AREA Information Server Technology, by Doug Nebert, WWW   Conference, 1994.   Status of the National Geospatial Data   Clearinghouse on the Internet
, by Doug Nebert, ESRI Conference, May   1995.   
- Supporting Search for Spatial Data on the   Internet: What it Means to be a Clearinghouse Node , by Doug Nebert,   1996.    Trends in Internet   Service of Maps and Spatial Data Sets, by Doug Nebert, AAG Conference,   1995.   Use of Z39.50 to Search and Retrieve   Geospatial Data
, by Doug Nebert and J. Fulton, Digital Libraries   Conference, June 1995   
- Z39.50 Application Profile   for Geospatial Metadata or "GEO"  (Implementor's documentation for FGDC   in Z39.50) |
|--|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
FORM 13F COVER PAGE

Report for the Calendar Year or Quarter Ended: December 31, 2010

Check here if Amendment [   ]; Amendment Number:
This Amendment (Check only one.):  [   ] is a restatement.
                                   [   ] adds new holdings entries.

Institutional Investment Manager Filing this Report:

Name:    Continental Casualty Company
Address: 333 S. Wabash
	 Chicago, IL 60604


13F File Number:  28-387

The institutional investment manager filing this report and the
person by whom it is signed hereby represent that the person
signing the report is authorized to submit it, that all
information contained herein is true, correct, and complete, and
that it is understood that all required items, statements,
schedules, lists, and tables, are considered integral parts of
this form.


Person Signing this Report on Behalf of Reporting Manager:

Name:  Lynne Gugenheim
Title: SVP & Deputy General Counsel
Phone: (312) 822 4921
Signature, Place, and Date of Signing:

/s/ Lynne Gugenheim                Chicago, IL                        02/14/2011
---------------------------------  ---------------------------------  ----------
[Signature]                        [City, State]                      [Date]



The securities on which Continental Casualty Company exercises
shared investment discretion have been reported upon by CNA
Financial Corporation on behalf of Continental Casualty Company.

Report Type (Check only one.):

 [    ]              13F HOLDINGS REPORT.

 [  x ]              13F NOTICE.

 [    ]              13F COMBINATION REPORT.

List of Other Managers Reporting for this Manager:

CNAF Financial Corporation

<Page>
No. II-12-021 April 16, 2012

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416

NRC SCHEDULES OPEN HOUSE TO DISCUSS ANNUAL 

ASSESSMENT OF CATAWBA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled an open house for 

Tuesday, April 24 to discuss the agency’s assessment of safety performance during 2011 for the 

Catawba nuclear power plant. The plant, operated by Duke Energy, is located near York, S.C., 

about 18 miles south of Charlotte, N.C.

The session, which will be open to the public, is scheduled from 6-8 p.m. EDT in the 

Rock Hill City Hall Rotunda, 155 Johnston St. in Rock Hill. A formal presentation will begin at 

6:30 p.m.

NRC staff will be available to answer questions on the safety performance of the 

Catawba plant, as well as the NRC role in ensuring safe plant operations. 

Overall, the NRC staff concluded that the Catawba plant operated safely in 2011 and will 

receive normal detailed baseline oversight and inspection efforts. All inspection findings and 

performance indicators at the plant were “green,” meaning they had very low safety significance.

The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess plant 

performance. The colors start with “green,” and escalate to “white,” “yellow” or “red,” based on

the significance of the issues. Inspection findings and performance indicators are updated on the 

NRC’s web site (www.nrc.gov) each quarter. 

“Our inspectors have worked many hours ensuring that the Catawba plant met NRC 

safety requirements and protected people living near the plant as well as the environment,” NRC 

Region II Administrator Victor McCree said.

NRC inspectors also looked at whether there were immediate safety concerns at Catawba

and other U.S. plants after the March 2011 events at the Fukushima Daiichi plant in Japan. Those 

reviews found that the plants remained safe.

The annual assessment letter for the Catawba plant is available on the NRC web site at 

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/cat_2011q4.pdf. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave. NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
Routine inspections are carried out by the NRC resident inspectors assigned to the plant 

and by inspection specialists from the Region II office in Atlanta. Among the areas at the

Catawba plant to be inspected this year by NRC specialists are operator licensing examinations

and underground piping and tanks.

Current performance information for Catawba Unit 1 is available on the NRC web site 

at www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/CAT1/cat1_chart.html. Current performance 

information for Catawba Unit 2 is available on the NRC web site at 

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/CAT2/cat2_chart.html.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.
1

Eric H. Holder, Jr. has been appointed to serve as Attorney General of the

United States, and is substituted as respondent pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate

Procedure 43(c).

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-2205

___________

Jose Rolando Aguilar-Canas; Evelyn *

Elizabeth Montoya-Palacios, *

*

Petitioners, *

* Petition for Review of

v. * an Order of the Board

* of Immigration Appeals.

Eric H. Holder, Jr.,1

 Attorney General, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Respondent. *

___________

Submitted: September 8, 2009

Filed: September 11, 2009

___________

Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Jose Rolando Aguilar-Canas and Evelyn Elizabeth Montoya-Palacios

(petitioners), natives and citizens of El Salvador, petition for review of an order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which summarily affirmed the decision of an

immigration judge (IJ), denying their request for asylum, withholding of removal, and

relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). Petitioners challenge the denial
-2-

of withholding of removal and CAT relief. Upon careful review, see Eta-Ndu v.

Gonzales, 411 F.3d 977, 982-83 (8th Cir. 2005) (stating the deferential standard of

review for denial of withholding of removal); Chege v. Holder, 309 F. App’x 78, 79

n.2 (8th Cir. 2009) (per curiam) (holding the petitioner’s failure to address her

Convention Against Torture claim in her brief amounted to waiver of such claim), we

deny the petition. 

For the reasons explained by the IJ, petitioners failed to show that the gang

violence they suffered in El Salvador was attributable either to a political opinion that

they held or to their membership in a particular social group; thus, they similarly

failed to show it was more likely than not that they would be persecuted on account

of any such protected ground if returned to El Salvador. See Davila-Mejia v.

Mukasey, 531 F.3d 624, 628 (8th Cir. 2008) (defining membership in particular social

group); Mohamed v. Ashcroft, 396 F.3d 999, 1003 (8th Cir. 2005) (explaining that

harm arising from general conditions such as anarchy, civil war, or mob violence will

not ordinarily support claim of persecution).

We deny the petition. 

______________________________
### SUBCHAPTER II—PUBLIC SERVICES
### SUBCHAPTER XII—ADVANCES TO STATE UNEMPLOYMENT FUNDS
### §3103. Acquisition programs

(a) Congressional Policy.—It is the policy of Congress that the head of each executive agency should achieve, on average, 90 percent of the cost, performance, and schedule goals established for major acquisition programs of the agency.

(b) Establishment of Goals.—

(1) By head of executive agency.—The head of each executive agency shall approve or define the cost, performance, and schedule goals for major acquisition programs of the agency.

(2) By chief financial officer.—The chief financial officer of an executive agency shall evaluate the cost goals proposed for each major acquisition program of the agency.

(c) Identification of Noncompliant Programs.—When it is necessary to implement the policy set out in subsection (a), the head of an executive agency shall—

(1) determine whether there is a continuing need for programs that are significantly behind schedule, over budget, or not in compliance with performance or capability requirements; and

(2) identify suitable actions to be taken, including termination, with respect to those programs.

(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3743.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3103 | 41:263. | June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title III, §313, as added Pub. L. 103–355, title V, §5051(a), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3351; Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title VIII, §851(a), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1851. |

Section
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. William Stevenson, Appellant, v Superintendent of Groveland Correctional Facility, Respondent.

[820 NYS2d 831]

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Livingston County (Gerard J. Alonzo, Jr., A.J.), entered October 26, 2004 in a habeas corpus proceeding. The judgment dismissed the petition.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs as moot *(see People ex rel. Kendricks v Smith,*52 AD2d 1090 [1976]). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Martoche, Smith and Green, JJ.
Issue Date 11/22/11 - 1 - 11-037 

 NRC INSPECTION MANUAL DIRS

Change Notice 11-037 

 DELETED: TRANSMITTED: 

 Number Date Number Date

1. IP 65001.02 10/03/07 IP 65001.02 11/22/11 

2. IP 90002 11/22/11 

TRAINING: None 

REMARKS: IP 65001.02: (Inspection of ITAAC-Related Installation of Structural 

Concrete) This document is being revised to update and clarify the 

waterproofing membrane and buried piping issue. 

 IP 90002: (Construction Degraded Performance Column Inspections) 

This is an initial issuance of this document 

DISTRIBUTION: Standard 

END
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: April 23, 2015 519189 

________________________________

In the Matter of ANTHONY 

MEDINA, 

Petitioner, 

v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

DONALD VENETTOZZI, as Acting 

Director of Special Housing 

and Inmate Disciplinary 

Programs, 

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: February 24, 2015

Before: McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Lynch and Devine, JJ.

__________

Anthony Medina, Romulus, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H.

Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this

Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to

review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and

Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating

a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with

threats, conspiring to take over an area of the correctional

facility, urging others to participate in actions detrimental to

the facility and creating a disturbance. According to the

misbehavior report, petitioner became loud and disruptive and

began pulling on the metal observation mesh in his cell. This

caused the lock and unlock lights for petitioner's cell to flash
-2- 519189 

in the control room. When correction officers responded to his

cell, he continued to yell threats and encourage inmates to "rile

this place up." Following a tier III disciplinary hearing at

which petitioner pleaded guilty with explanation to creating a

disturbance, the Hearing Officer found him guilty of that charge

and not guilty of the remaining charges. The determination was

affirmed upon administrative appeal and this CPLR article 78

proceeding ensued.

We confirm. Petitioner's plea of guilty with an

explanation precludes a challenge to the sufficiency of the

evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of

Campbell v Bedard, 123 AD3d 1278, 1278 [2014]; Matter of Ramos v

Annucci, 121 AD3d 1486, 1486 [2014]). Petitioner's remaining

contentions, including that he was denied the assistant of his

choice and that the Hearing Officer improperly denied him access

to the confidential mental health testimony, are unpreserved for

our review given his failure to raise them at the hearing

(see Matter of Robinson v Annucci, 122 AD3d 981, 982 [2014];

Matter of Abrams v Fischer, 109 AD3d 1030, 1031 [2013]).

McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Lynch and Devine, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without

costs, and petition dismissed. 

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
§ 930.150 Objectives. ( a ) A federal activity may affect coastal uses or resources of a State other than the State in which the activity will occur. Effective coastal management is fostered by ensuring that activities having such reasonably foreseeable interstate coastal effects are conducted consistent with the enforceable policies of the management program of each affected State.
( b ) The application of the federal consistency requirement to activities having interstate coastal effects is addressed by this subpart in order to encourage cooperation among States in dealing with activities having interstate coastal effects, and to provide States, local governments, Federal agencies, and the public with a predictable framework for evaluating the consistency of these federal activities under the Act.
# L_2023004EN.01007301.xml

| 5.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 4/73 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 4/73

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 240/2019

of 27 September 2019

amending Annex XI (Electronic communication, audiovisual services and information society) to the EEA Agreement [2023/45]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/419 of 23 January 2019 pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the adequate protection of personal data by Japan under the Act on the Protection of Personal Information (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/419 of 23 January 2019 pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the adequate protection of personal data by Japan under the Act on the Protection of Personal Information (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 5eq (Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1250) of Annex XI to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘5er. | 32019 D 0419: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/419 of 23 January 2019 pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the adequate protection of personal data by Japan under the Act on the Protection of Personal Information (OJ L 76, 19.3.2019, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘5er.

32019 D 0419: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/419 of 23 January 2019 pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the adequate protection of personal data by Japan under the Act on the Protection of Personal Information (OJ L 76, 19.3.2019, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/419 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 28 September 2019, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 27 September 2019.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gunnar PÁLSSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 76, 19.3.2019, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---