alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §8138. Treatment of certain health facilities as State homes

(a) The Secretary may treat a health facility (or certain beds in a health facility) as a State home for purposes of subchapter V of chapter 17 of this title if the following requirements are met:

(1) The facility (or certain beds in such facility) meets the standards for the provision of nursing home care that are applicable to State homes, as prescribed by the Secretary under section 8134(b) of this title, and such other standards relating to the facility (or certain beds in such facility) as the Secretary may require.

(2) The facility (or certain beds in such facility) is licensed or certified by the appropriate State and local agencies charged with the responsibility of licensing or otherwise regulating or inspecting State home facilities.

(3) The State demonstrates in an application to the Secretary that, but for the treatment of a facility (or certain beds in such facility), as a State home under this subsection, a substantial number of veterans residing in the geographic area in which the facility is located who require nursing home care will not have access to such care.

(4) The Secretary determines that the treatment of the facility (or certain beds in such facility) as a State home best meets the needs of veterans for nursing home care in the geographic area in which the facility is located.

(5) The Secretary approves the application submitted by the State with respect to the facility (or certain beds in such facility).

(b) The Secretary may not treat a health facility (or certain beds in a health facility) as a State home under subsection (a) if the Secretary determines that such treatment would increase the number of beds allocated to the State in excess of the limit on the number of beds provided for by regulations prescribed under section 8134(a) of this title.

(c) The number of beds occupied by veterans in a health facility for which payment may be made under subchapter V of chapter 17 of this title by reason of subsection (a) shall not exceed—

(1) 100 beds in the aggregate for all States; and

(2) in the case of any State, the difference between—

(A) the number of veterans authorized to be in beds in State homes in such State under regulations prescribed under section 8134(a) of this title; and

(B) the number of veterans actually in beds in State homes (other than facilities or certain beds treated as State homes under subsection (a)) in such State under regulations prescribed under such section.

(d) The number of beds in a health facility in a State that has been treated as a State home under subsection (a) shall be taken into account in determining the unmet need for beds for State homes for the State under section 8134(d)(1) of this title.

(e) The Secretary may not treat any new health facilities (or any new certain beds in a health facility) as a State home under subsection (a) after September 30, 2009.

(Added Pub. L. 109–461, title II, §211(c)(1), Dec. 22, 2006, 120 Stat. 3420.)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Abraham Schwartz, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-10-0144 - Recent Staff Outreach Regarding Specific License Requirements for Exports to Embargoed Destinations

Accession Number: ML102950106

Date Released: Monday, December 13, 2010

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML102930641 - SECY-10-0144 - Recent Staff Outreach Regarding Specific License Requirement for Exports to Embargoed Destinations. (4 page(s), 10/29/2010)
    - ML102950109 - Enclosure - OIP Import/Export Webpage. (4 page(s), 10/22/2010)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### Carnegie Trust Company v. S. H. Kress.

Motion granted. Order to be settled on notice. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
### [§11332. Repealed. Pub. L. 107–296, title X, §1005(a)(1), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2272; Pub. L. 107–347, title III, §305(a), Dec. 17, 2002, 116 Stat. 2960]

Section, Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1244, related to Federal computer system security training and plan.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Dec. 17, 2002, see section 402(b) of Pub. L. 107–347, set out as an Effective Date of 2002 Amendments note under section 3504 of Title 44, Public Printing and Documents.

Repeal by Pub. L. 107–296 effective 60 days after Nov. 25, 2002, see section 4 of Pub. L. 107–296, set out as an Effective Date note under section 101 of Title 6, Domestic Security.
### §15705. Biannual meetings of representatives of all Commissions

(a) In General.—Representatives of each Commission, the Appalachian Regional Commission, and the Denali Commission shall meet biannually to discuss issues confronting regions suffering from chronic and contiguous distress and successful strategies for promoting regional development.

(b) Chair of Meetings.—The chair of each meeting shall rotate among the Commissions, with the Appalachian Regional Commission to host the first meeting.

(Added Pub. L. 110–234, title XIV, §14217(a)(2), May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1480, and Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title XIV, §14217(a)(2), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 2242.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 enacted identical sections. Pub. L. 110–234 was repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the first day of the first fiscal year beginning after June 18, 2008, see section 14217(d) of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as a note under section 15101 of this title.
# , .PuLASKI

Dedicated to IJOUrsuccess

www.pulaskitech.edu Technical College

' .... ,, ' ·--., ; !: ' ,;**~** ,Z··. ·' :'>**~>** 

### .., :November 5 1 2012 '· ;;:,::**~** 

# ·.**~** 

# ,_ :znrz .f.:nv 2.1 P

_ !: 

## 22

·.··.**~.:,**..... 

### U:S. Department ofTransportation ·:;

### 'D' Docket Operations, M-30 West·Building ground floor Room W12-140 ·, 1200 New**~ers.ey.:Avenue,** SE. · Washington, DC 20590 SUBJECT: Request for extension of exemption. Exemption No: 10168 Docket Number FAA-2002-13291 Dear Sir or Madam, ••• ;'1'.

1. am-writing in resppnse ofthe notice that my exemption for FAAtesting will expire November 30,· 2012. This is my second requestjust to ensure that your office will receive ourrequest. ' · ·· I**r~quest** that an·exte.nsiori ofthe exemption be approved for my organization. The ability to test students upon the completion oftraining has greatly benefited their ability to succeed in their,pursuit of FAA mechanics certification. In the past a student had to complete 12 months oftraining before being evaluated on the first 3 months ofthat training.

' ><;. .: • Since the approval ofthis exemptioiJ·;the"completion rate of our curriculum has increased. The number of students completing the entire maintenance training program has also increased. " With the implantation ofthis exemption students are more confident and self reliant as to their ability to succeed in the program. It has benefited this program immensely. I hope to have our exemption extended another 2 years. Please contact me ifyou have any questions.**Sincerely,~~** Steven 

### L. Hotle, Director Pulaski Technical CollegeAviation Technology Center PH: (501) 835-5420 FX: (501) 834-7859

Aviation Maintenance Technology Center 16oo West Maryland Avenue North Little Rock, AR 72120 Phone 501-835-5420 Fax 501-834·7859
### Part D—Area Health Services Development Funds

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 96–79, title II, §202(a), Oct. 4, 1979, 93 Stat. 632, redesignated former part F as part D relating to area health services development funds and former part D as part B.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 222 (Thursday, November 18, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67608-67609]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25597]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Bureau of Labor Statistics


Federal Economic Statistics Advisory Committee; Notice of Open 
Meeting and Agenda

    The seventh meeting of the Federal Economic Statistics Advisory 
Committee will be held on December 14, 2004 in the Postal Square 
Building, 2 Massachusetts Avenue NE., Washington, DC. A meeting that 
had been scheduled for June 11, 2004, which would have been the 
Committee's seventh meeting, was canceled because that date was 
declared a national day of mourning for former President Ronald Reagan 
and Federal offices were closed.
    The Federal Economic Statistics Advisory Committee is a technical 
committee composed of economists, statisticians, and behavioral 
scientists who are recognized for their attainments and objectivity in 
their respective fields. Committee members are called upon to analyze 
issues involved in producing Federal economic statistics and recommend 
practices that will lead to optimum efficiency, effectiveness, and 
cooperation among the Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics 
and the Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis and Bureau 
of the Census.
    The meeting will be held in Meeting Rooms 1 and 2 of the Postal 
Square Building Conference Center. The schedule and agenda for the 
meeting are as follows:

9 a.m. Opening session
9:45 a.m. Alternative measures of household income
1 p.m. Priorities for future meetings

[[Page 67609]]

1:30 p.m. Response rates and nonresponse in establishment surveys
3:45 p.m. Development of an Employment Cost Index (ECI) excluding 
workers earning incentive pay
4:45 p.m. Conclude (approximate time)

    The meeting is open to the public. Any questions concerning the 
meeting should be directed to Margaret Johnson, Federal Economic 
Statistics Advisory Committee, on Area Code (202) 691-5600. Individuals 
with disabilities, who need special accommodations, should contact Ms. 
Johnson at least two days prior to the meeting date.

    Signed at Washington, DC the 3rd day of November 2004.
Kathleen P. Utgoff,
Commissioner of Labor Statistics.
[FR Doc. 04-25597 Filed 11-17-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-24-P
### subpart 1—requirements payments
ISO Metadata Standard Harmonization Status 

NSDI

By: Rick Pearsall

      FGDC Metadata Coordinator

FGDC MWG Meeting

ISO Metadata Standard Status 
        -  FGDC Registered Review of ISO Metadata Standard Committee Draft - Summer/Fall 1998
        -  210 Registrants
        -  approximately 500 comments
        -  ISO Metadata Standard Editorial Committee Meeting - December 1998
        -  10 Nations/Liaisons attended
        -  962 comments

NSDI

FGDC MWG Meeting

ISO Metadata Standard Editorial Committee MeetingResults 
        -  Total Document Restructure
        -  Metadata Dictionary/Repository

	 (all elements)
        -  Essential Metadata

	 (Mandatory elements)
        -  Structured towards Profiles
        -  International, National, Private/Industry

NSDI

FGDC MWG Meeting

ISO Metadata Standard Editorial Committee MeetingResults 
        -  Requirement for TC211 UML Model
        -  Schedule slide approx. 6 months
        -  Another Committee Draft review - June 1999
        -  DIS Vote - Fall 1999
        -  Approved ISO Standard - Spring 2000 

NSDI

FGDC MWG Meeting

ISO Metadata Standard Essential Metadata 

Title

Abstract

Bounding Geospatial Coord (4)

Dataset Language

Dataset Character set

Metadata Language

Metadata Character set

Resp Party Name

Resp Party Address

Themecode

Reference Date

NSDI

FGDC MWG Meeting

ISO Metadata Standard Implementation/Education
        -  Development of FGDC Profile(s)  - 	Summer/Fall 1999 (finalized early spring 2000)
        -  Implementation Issues
        -  Software development to migrate FGDC Metadata records to ISO
        -  Significant Vendor Interest

NSDI

FGDC MWG Meeting

ISO Metadata Standard Implementation/Education
        -  Metadata Collection/Validation Software Education
        - Training
        -  FGDC Metadata Training Meeting (April 1999)
        -  FGDC/UCGIS Contract for University Metadata educational material
        - NSGIC indicating interest to be focal point for metadata training
        -  Materials - ie factsheets, workbook
        -  Timetable
        -  Migration of existing metadata records
        -  Population of new metadata records

NSDI

FGDC MWG Meeting
#### § 842.401 Purpose.

This subpart regulates the basic annuity computation under the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS).
### SUBCHAPTER II—SUPPLY CHAINS FOR CLEAN ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2099

To extend the existing temporary duty suspension on 2,4-Dicumylphenol. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2003

Mr. MCNULTY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To extend the existing temporary duty suspension on 2,4-

Dicumylphenol.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. 2,4-DICUMYLPHENOL. 

4 (a) AMENDMENT.—Heading 9902.19.80 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended 

6 in the effective period column by striking ‘‘2003’’ and in7 serting ‘‘2005’’. 

8 (b) RETROACTIVE APPLICATION.—If the date of the 

9 enactment of this Act occurs on or after January 1, 2004, 

10 then, notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of 

11 1930 or any other provision of law, and upon proper re-
2

•HR 2099 IH 

1 quest filed with the Bureau of Customs and Border Pro2 tection of the Department of Homeland Security within 

3 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, any 

4 entry, or withdrawal from warehouse for consumption, of 

5 goods described in heading 9902.19.80 of the Harmonized 

6 Tariff Schedule of the United States—

7 (1) which is made after December 31, 2003, 

8 and before the date of the enactment of this Act, 

9 and 

10 (2) with respect to which there would have been 

11 no duty if the amendment made by subsection (a) 

12 applied to such entry or withdrawal, 

13 shall be liquidated or reliquidated as if such amendment 

14 applied to such entry or withdrawal.

Æ
#### Christian Camps, Inc., Respondent, v. Village of Speculator, Hamilton County, Appellant. Christian Camps, Inc., Respondent, v. School District No. 1 of the Town of Lake Pleasant, Hamilton County, Appellant. Christian Camps, Inc., Respondent, v. County of Hamilton, Defendant, and Town of Lake Pleasant, Hamilton County, Appellant.

Present — Foster, P. J., Heffeman, Brewster, Santry and Bergan, JJ. [See *post,*p. 1004.]
#### § 971.804 Amendment to regulations for conservation, protection of the environment, and safety of life and property at sea.

The Administrator may amend the regulations in this part and 15 CFR part 970 at any time as the Administrator determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to provide for the conservation of natural resources, protection of the environment, or the safety of life and property at sea. The amended regulations will apply to all exploration or commercial recovery activities conducted under any license or permit issued or maintained pursuant to this part or 15 CFR part 970, except that amended regulations which provide for conservation of natural resources will apply to activities conducted under an existing license or permit during the present term of that license or permit only if the Administrator determines that the amended regulations providing for conservation of natural resources will not impose serious or irreparable economic hardship on the licensee or permittee. Any amendment to regulations under this section will be made pursuant to the procedures in subpart I of this part.
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2011-0548 Directorate ID: 2011-SW-025-AD

Helicopter Model: Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation (Sikorsky) Model S-92A Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 29 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: This AD is prompted by a report of a crack found on the MGB upper housing assembly left 

mounting foot forward rib that cannot be detected visually. This AD requires a nondestructive inspection 

(NDI), eddy current or fluorescent penetrant inspection (FPI), of each main gearbox (MGB) upper 

housing assembly rib on the left, right, and forward MGB mounting foot. If there is a crack, this AD 

requires replacement.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $286,000 for a MGB upper housing.

Labor per Helicopter 29 helicopters x 3.5 work-hours per inspection x 16 

inspections per year x $85 per work-hour = 

$138,040.

56 work-hours x $85 per work-hour = $4,760, to 

replace 1 MGB.

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $4,760 to do 16 NDI inspections per year.

Total US Fleet Cost $428,800, assuming 1 replacement of the MGB 

upper housing assembly.

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Michael Schwetz
No: III-13-018 May 16, 2013

CONTACT: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663

NRC Regional Office to Discuss Regulations about Releases from Nuclear Power Plants; 

Webinar to be Held May 23

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Region III office will hold a webinar May 23 to discuss 

how radioactive releases from nuclear power plants to the environment are regulated to ensure the public 

and environment are protected.

The office, located in Lisle, Ill., will explain our regulations, how releases are monitored, NRC 

limits, and how the public and environment are protected. The NRC will also briefly discuss a recent 

release below NRC limits from a water tank at the Palisades nuclear power plant.

“We remain committed to having open and transparent discussions about the NRC’s oversight of 

nuclear power plants,” said Region III Administrator Charles Casto. “This webinar will give us an 

opportunity to continue the conversation with the public about issues of interest to them.”

Any radioactive release from a nuclear power plant is reported to the NRC. One way the NRC 

ensures safety is to keep plant releases as low as reasonably possible under the existing limit for the 

public. 

The webinar will be held from 5:30-6:30 p.m. EDT. Participants will be able to view 

presentation slides prepared by NRC staff and submit questions in writing over the Internet. Interested 

members of the public must to register at https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/781378536 or follow 

the instructions on the meeting notice in order to participate.
### SUBCHAPTER III—COMMERCIAL REUSABLE IN-SPACE TRANSPORTATION
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ProUroCareMedical Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Richard Thon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1)           the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

/s/ Richard Thon       

Richard Thon

Chief FinancialOfficer

May 15, 2007

----
No: III-14-014 April 9, 2014

CONTACT: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663

NRC Schedules Public Meeting April 15 to Discuss Performance of 

Duane Arnold Energy Center 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a public meeting with representatives of 

NextEra Energy Duane Arnold on April 15 to discuss the agency’s 2013 assessment of safety 

performance at the Duane Arnold Energy Center. The plant is located in Palo, Iowa, approximately eight

miles northwest of Cedar Rapids.

The meeting is scheduled for 6:00 p.m. at the Hiawatha Community Center, 101 Emmons St., In 

Hiawatha, Iowa. The NRC will present its assessment of the plant’s 2013 performance, talk about 

agency activities, and be available to discuss questions or comments with the public. 

“NRC inspectors spend a significant amount of time monitoring a wide range of plant activities 

to ensure the plant operates safely. Our hands-on approach is a key factor in protecting the public and 

environment,” said NRC Region III Administrator Cynthia D. Pederson. “We hold public meetings near 

the plant every year to update those who live nearby about NRC’s oversight.”

The annual assessment letter sent from the NRC Region III office to plant officials addresses the 

performance of the plant during 2013 and will serve as the basis for the discussion.

The NRC’s assessment of Duane Arnold’s performance is that overall the plant operated safely 

last year. A decline in performance, however, was reflected in two inspection findings of low to 

moderate safety significance. One finding related to poor procedures and maintenance of the diesel 

generator oil heat exchanger. The second finding involved the failure to perform an operability 

evaluation and investigate an unexpected reading on the reactor core isolation cooling turbine speed 

indicator.

The decline in the plant’s performance has resulted in increased oversight and additional 

inspections to ensure effective corrective actions. Routine inspections are performed by two NRC 

Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant and by inspection specialists from the Region III Office in 

Lisle, Ill., and the agency’s headquarters in Rockville, Md.

The most current performance information for Duane Arnold is available on the NRC's website.
________________________________________________________________________ 

TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 20-701 

ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION 

Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and OTHER GOVERNMENTS 

Signed at Mexico City, Washington and Ottawa 

November 30, 2018, December 11, 2018 and 

December 18, 2018 

Entered into force July 1, 2020 

With Exchange of Notes 
 

 

NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)— 

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.”