Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 224 / Monday, November 22, 2004 / Notices 67911

(202) 564–0050; e-mail address: 

fried.gregory@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has 

submitted the following ICR to OMB for 

review and approval according to the 

procedures prescribed in 5 CFR 1320.12. 

On May 25, 2004, (69 FR 29718), EPA 

sought comments on this ICR pursuant 

to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no 

comments. 

EPA has established a public docket 

for this ICR under Docket ID No. OECA–

2004–0022, which is available for public 

viewing at the Enforcement and 

Compliance Docket and Information 

Center in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/

DC), EPA West, Room B102, 1301 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC. The EPA Docket Center Public 

Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 

4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

excluding legal holidays. The telephone 

number for the Reading Room is (202) 

566–1744, and the telephone number for 

the Enforcement and Compliance 

Docket and Information Center Docket 

is: (202) 566–1752. An electronic 

version of the public docket is available 

through EPA Dockets (EDOCKET) at 

http://www.epa.gov/edocket. Use 

EDOCKET to submit or view public 

comments, access the index listing of 

the contents of the public docket, and to 

access those documents in the public 

docket that are available electronically. 

When in the system, select ‘‘search,’’

then key in the docket ID number 

identified above. 

Any comments related to this ICR 

should be submitted to EPA and OMB 

within 30 days of this notice. EPA’s 

policy is that public comments, whether 

submitted electronically or in paper, 

will be made available for public 

viewing in EDOCKET as EPA receives 

them and without change, unless the 

comment contains copyrighted material, 

Confidential Business Information (CBI), 

or other information whose public 

disclosure is restricted by statute. When 

EPA identifies a comment containing 

copyrighted material, EPA will provide 

a reference to that material in the 

version of the comment that is placed in 

EDOCKET. The entire printed comment, 

including the copyrighted material, will 

be available in the public docket. 

Although identified as an item in the 

official docket, information claimed as 

CBI, or whose disclosure is otherwise 

restricted by statute, is not included in 

the official public docket, and will not 

be available for public viewing in 

EDOCKET. For further information 

about the electronic docket, see EPA’s 

Federal Register notice describing the 

electronic docket at 67 FR 38102 (May 

31, 2002), or go to http://www.epa.gov/

edocket.

Title: NSPS for Portland Cement 

Plants (40 CFR part 60, subpart F) 

(Renewal). 

Abstract: Particulate matter emissions 

from portland cement plants cause or 

contribute to air pollution that may 

reasonably be anticipated to endanger 

public health or welfare. Therefore, 

NSPS were promulgated for this source 

category. 

The control of emissions of 

particulate matter from portland cement 

plants requires not only the installation 

of properly designed equipment, but 

also the operation and maintenance of 

that equipment. Emissions of particulate 

matter from portland cement plants are 

the result of operation of kilns, clinker 

coolers, raw mill systems, raw mill 

dryers, raw material storage, clinker 

storage, finished product storage, 

conveyor transfer points, bagging and 

bulk loading and unloading systems. 

These standards rely on the capture of 

particulate emissions by a baghouse or 

electrostatic precipitator. 

In order to ensure compliance with 

these standards, adequate reporting and 

recordkeeping is necessary. In the 

absence of such information, 

enforcement personnel would be unable 

to determine whether the standards are 

being met on a continuous basis, as 

required by the Clean Air Act. 

All reports are sent to the delegated 

state or local authority. In the event that 

there is no such delegated authority, the 

reports are sent directly to the EPA 

regional office. Notifications are used to 

inform the Agency or delegated 

authority when a source becomes 

subject to the standard. The reviewing 

authority may then inspect the source to 

check if the pollution control devices 

are properly installed and operated. 

Performance test reports are needed as 

these are the Agency’s record of a 

source’s initial capability to comply 

with the emission standard and note the 

operating conditions under which 

compliance was achieved. The quarterly 

reports are used for problem 

identification, as a check on source 

operation and maintenance, and for 

compliance determinations. The 

standard also requires semiannual 

reporting of deviations from monitored 

opacity, as this is a good indicator of the 

source’s compliance status. 

An agency may not conduct or 

sponsor, and a person is not required to 

respond to, a collection of information 

unless it displays a currently valid OMB 

Control Number. The OMB Control 

Numbers for EPA’s regulations are listed 

in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15, 

and are identified on the form and/or 

instrument, if applicable. 

Burden Statement: The annual public 

reporting and recordkeeping burden for 

this collection of information is 

estimated to average 64.4 hours per 

response. Burden means the total time, 

effort, or financial resources expended 

by persons to generate, maintain, retain, 

or disclose or provide information to or 

for a Federal agency. This includes the 

time needed to review instructions; 

develop, acquire, install, and utilize 

technology and systems for the purposes 

of collecting, validating, and verifying 

information, processing and 

maintaining information, and disclosing 

and providing information; adjust the 

existing ways to comply with any 

previously applicable instructions and 

requirements; train personnel to be able 

to respond to a collection of 

information; search data sources; 

complete and review the collection of 

information; and transmit or otherwise 

disclose the information. 

Respondents/Affected Entities:

Portland Cement Plants. 

Estimated Number of Respondents:

118. 

Frequency of Response: Initially and 

semiannually. 

Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden:

15,978 hours. 

Estimated Total Annual Costs:

$1,552,045, which includes $37,000 

annualized capital/startup costs, 

$495,600 annual O&M costs, and 

$1,019,445 annual labor costs. 

Changes in the Estimates: There is an 

increase of 8,010 hours in the total 

estimated burden currently identified in 

the OMB Inventory of Approved ICR 

Burdens. This increase is primarily due 

to an increase in the estimated number 

of existing affected sources from 113 to 

118 and an increase in the number of 

hours to submit semiannual reports 

from 16 hours to 24 hours.

Dated: November 13, 2004. 

Oscar Morales, 

Director, Collection Strategies Division.

[FR Doc. 04–25822 Filed 11–19–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

[EB Docket No. 04–381; DA 04–3048] 

Hearing Designation Order To 

Adjudicate Petition for 

Reconsideration Filed by Gulf Power 

Company

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

67912 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 224 / Monday, November 22, 2004 / Notices 

1China Shipping Container Lines (Hong Kong) 

Co., Ltd. is a wholly owned subsidiary of China 

Shipping Container Lines Co. Ltd. (‘‘CSCL’’). On 

April 1, 2004 the Commission issued an Order in 

Petition No. P4–03, granting CSCL an exemption 

like that now sought by Petitioner—an exemption 

from the first sentence of section 9(c) of the 1984 

Act.

2The Petitioner, to date, has operated only 

outside of the United States’ trades. Petitioner 

advises that it will commence operations in the U.S. 

trades on or about January 1, 2005.

SUMMARY: On September 27, 2004, the 

Enforcement Bureau of the Federal 

Communications Commission 

(Commission) released a Hearing 

Designation Order (HDO) initiating a 

hearing to determine whether Gulf 

Power Company (Gulf Power) is entitled 

to receive compensation above marginal 

cost for any attachments to its utility 

poles belonging to Florida Cable 

Telecommunications Association; 

Comcast Cablevision of Panama City, 

Inc.; Mediacom Southeast, L.L.C.; and 

Cox Communications Gulf Coast, L.L.C 

(collectively, Cable Operators). To avail 

themselves of the opportunity to 

participate in this hearing, the parties 

were required to file a written Notice of 

Appearance with the Office of the 

Commission Secretary, stating an 

intention to appear on the date fixed for 

the hearing and present evidence on the 

issues specified in the HDO, within 20 

days of the mailing of the HDO to the 

parties.

DATES: The HDO was mailed to the 

parties on September 27, 2004. The 

parties were required to file their 

Notices of Appearance by October 18, 

2004.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications 

Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., 

Room TW–204(B), Washington, DC 

20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Rhonda J. Lien, 202–418–7330.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Enforcement Bureau previously ruled 

that Gulf Power violated section 224 of 

the Act, 47 U.S.C. 224, and the 

Commission’s pole attachment rules, 47 

CFR 1.1401–1.1418, by charging the 

Cable Operators rates higher than those 

allowed by the Commission’s rules and 

policies and by refusing to negotiate 

new rates in good faith. See Florida 

Cable Telecommunications Association, 

Inc.; Comcast Cablevision of Panama 

City, Inc.; Mediacom Southeast, L.L.C.; 

and Cox Communications Gulf Coast 

L.L.C. v. Gulf Power Company,

Memorandum Opinion and Order, 18 

FCC Rcd 9599 (Enf. Bur. 2003). Gulf 

Power timely filed a Petition for 

Reconsideration and Request for 

Evidentiary Hearing on June 23, 2003. 

The complete text of this HDO is 

available for inspection and copying 

during normal business hours in the 

FCC Reference Information Center, 

Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room 

CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554. This 

document may also be purchased from 

the Commission’s duplicating 

contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. 

(BCPI), Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., 

Room CY–B402, Washington, DC 20554, 

telephone 202–863–2893, facsimile 

202–863–2898, or via e-mail at http://

www.bcpiweb.com.

Federal Communications Commission. 

Christopher N. Olsen, 

Deputy Chief, Enforcement Bureau.

[FR Doc. 04–25517 Filed 11–19–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

[Petition No. P6–04] 

Petition of China Shipping Container 

Lines (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd., for an 

Exemption From the First Sentence of 

Section 9(c) of the Shipping Act; 

Notice of Filing 

Notice is hereby given that China 

Shipping Container Lines (Hong Kong) 

Co., Ltd. (‘‘Petitioner’’), a controlled 

carrier as that term is defined by the 

Shipping Act of 1984, has petitioned, 

pursuant to section 16 of the Shipping 

Act of 1984, 46 U.S.C. app. 1715, and 

46 CFR 502.69, for an exemption from 

the first sentence of section 9(c) of the 

1984 Act, 46 U.S.C. app. 1708(c).1

Petitioner seeks an exemption so that it 

may reduce its tariff rates upon 

publication.2

In order for the Commission to make 

a thorough evaluation of the Petition, 

interested persons are requested to 

submit views or arguments in reply to 

the Petition no later than December 6, 

2004. Replies shall consist of an original 

and 15 copies, be directed to the 

Secretary, Federal Maritime 

Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, 

NW., Washington, DC 20573–0001, and 

be served on Petitioner’s counsel, Brett 

M. Esber, Esq., Blank Rome LLP, 

Watergate 600 New Hampshire Avenue, 

NW., Washington, DC 20037. It is also 

requested that a copy of the reply be 

submitted in electronic form 

(WordPerfect, Word or ASCII) on 

diskette or e-mailed to 

Secretary@fmc.gov.

Copies of the petition are available at 

the Office of the Secretary of the 

Commission, 800 N. Capitol Street, 

NW., Room 1046. A copy may also be 

obtained by sending a request to 

secretary@fmc.gov or by calling (202) 

523–5725. Parties participating in this 

proceeding may elect to receive service 

of the Commission’s issuances in this 

proceeding through e-mail in lieu of 

service by U.S. mail. A party opting for 

electronic service shall advise the Office 

of the Secretary in writing and provide 

an e-mail address where service can be 

made. Such request may be directed to 

secretary@fmc.gov.

Bryant L. VanBrakle, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 04–25770 Filed 11–19–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6730–01–P

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed Collection; 

Comment Request

AGENCY: Board of Governors of the 

Federal Reserve System

SUMMARY: June 15, 1984, the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) 

delegated to the Board of Governors of 

the Federal Reserve System (Board) its 

approval authority under the Paperwork 

Reduction Act, as per 5 CFR 1320.16, to 

approve of and assign OMB control 

numbers to collection of information 

requests and requirements conducted or 

sponsored by the Board under 

conditions set forth in 5 CFR 1320 

Appendix A.1. Board–approved 

collections of information are 

incorporated into the official OMB 

inventory of currently approved 

collections of information. Copies of the 

OMB 83–Is and supporting statements 

and approved collection of information 

instruments are placed into OMB’s 

public docket files. The Federal Reserve 

may not conduct or sponsor, and the 

respondent is not required to respond 

to, an information collection that has 

been extended, revised, or implemented 

on or after October 1, 1995, unless it 

displays a currently valid OMB control 

number.

Request for comment on information 

collection proposal

The following information collection, 

which is being handled under this 

delegated authority, has received initial 

Board approval and is hereby published 

for comment. At the end of the comment 

period, the proposed information 

collection, along with an analysis of 

comments and recommendations 

received, will be submitted to the Board 

for final approval under OMB delegated 

authority. Comments are invited on the 

following:

a. whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper