alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. IV-12-026

Contact: Victor Dricks (817) 200-1128

 Lara Uselding (817) 200-1519

 

July 6, 2012 

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

NRC ISSUES CONFIRMATORY ACTION LETTER TO URANIUM ONE USA

FOLLOWING URANIUM RELEASE EVENT IN CANADA

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a Confirmatory Action Letter 

documenting actions that Uranium One USA has agreed to take following an incident in Canada 

in which three workers were exposed to yellowcake from a drum shipped from a U.S. facility.

The incident occurred on June 23 at a uranium conversion facility in Blind River, 

Canada. When a worker loosened a ring clamp on a 55-gallon drum containing uranium oxide 

yellowcake the lid blew off, ejecting about 26 kilograms of the material into the air. The worker 

closest to the drum and two others in the area, who were not wearing respirators, were exposed 

to airborne uranium. Any adverse health effects to the workers would likely be caused by 

chemical, rather than radiological effects.

The barrel had been shipped from Uranium One’s Willow Creek Facility in Wyoming to 

a Canadian conversion facility on May 29. Following this incident several other drums shipped 

to the Canadian facility containing yellowcake were found to be bulging from internal pressure. 

The Canadian facility has stopped opening containers of yellowcake from Uranium One’s 

Willow Creek facility until they can develop a plan to safely do so. The licensee has notified the 

NRC that it has suspended all shipping from the Willow Creek facility until it determines how 

the drums became pressurized. 

Under the terms of the Confirmatory Action Letter, Uranium One has agreed to 

investigate the cause of the event; develop a course of action to ensure the safety of any other 

unopened drums containing yellowcake previously shipped from its Wyoming facility; and 

develop a corrective action plan to ensure the safety of continued storage, shipment or further 

processing of the yellowcake. 

After similar events occurred at several facilities in 1998, corrective actions were adopted 

by the industry to prevent recurrence. Specifically, new procedures were adopted to ensure that 

drums containing yellowcake remained unsealed for at least three hours to ensure adequate 

cooling of the material.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV

 1600 E. Lamar Blvd.

 Arlington, TX 76011 - 4125

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov
Once the licensee has completed its own investigation, the NRC will conduct an 

inspection to independently evaluate the circumstances surrounding this event. The NRC will 

also review the licensee’s proposed corrective actions to ensure the facility can resume safe

shipping.

Copies of the Confirmatory Action letter will be posted on the NRC’s web site.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.
#### § 930.40 Multiple Federal agency participation.

Whenever more than one Federal agency is involved in a Federal agency activity or its associated facilities affecting any coastal use or resource, or is involved in a group of Federal agency activities related to each other because of their geographic proximity, the Federal agencies may prepare one consistency determination for all the federal activities involved. In such cases, Federal agencies should consider joint preparation or lead agency development of the consistency determination. In either case, the consistency determination shall be transmitted to the State agency at least 90 days before final decisions are taken by any of the participating agencies and shall comply with the requirements of § 930.39.
1

The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the Northern District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-1361

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Northern District of Iowa.

*

Francisco Javier Rivera-Gutierrez, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: May 13, 2009

Filed: June 9, 2009

___________

Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Francisco Rivera-Gutierrez pleaded guilty to illegally re-entering the United

States, after having been removed subsequent to a 1990 felony conviction for assault

with a dangerous weapon and a 1998 aggravated felony conviction for a drugtrafficking offense, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(2). The district court1

sentenced him to 57 months in prison and 3 years of supervised release. On appeal,

his counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the sentence is greater than necessary to comply with
-2-

the purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and thus unreasonable, because the district court

gave undue weight to Rivera-Gutierrez’s early criminal history and failed to give

sufficient weight to his significant break from his past criminal behavior.

We conclude that the sentence, which was within the advisory Guidelines range,

is not unreasonable. See United States v. Toothman, 543 F.3d 967, 970 (8th Cir.

2008) (a sentence within the advisory range is accorded presumption of

reasonableness on appeal); see also Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338, 341 (2007)

(allowing appellate presumption of reasonableness). The district court expressly

considered relevant factors under section 3553(a), including Rivera-Gutierrez’s

criminal history, and nothing in the record suggests that the court misapplied those

factors. After reviewing the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75,

80 (1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant

counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.

______________________________
### **CHAPTER 141—COMMERCIAL SPACE OPPORTUNITIES AND TRANSPORTATION SERVICES**
NRC ASSIGNS RESIDENT INSPECTOR TO ROBINSON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Atlanta have selected Christian Scott as the 

resident inspector for Progress Energy’s Robinson nuclear power plant, located near Hartsville, 

S.C., 26 miles northwest of Florence. Scott joins acting senior resident inspector Tim Chandler 

who is filling in for Jim Hickey. Hickey is on a temporary assignment in Atlanta until October.

Scott joined the NRC in June 2006 as a reactor engineer in the 

Nuclear Safety Professional Development Program in the NRC’s Region 

III office in Lisle, Ill. He served as a reactor engineer in the Region III 

Division of Reactor Projects until he was selected as the Robinson 

plant’s resident inspector.

Scott received a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering 

from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, N.Y., in 2005. Scott also received a bachelor’s

degree in applied physics from Morehouse College in Atlanta in 2006. Following graduation, 

Scott entered the NRC’s Nuclear Safety Professional Development Program.

“Christian Scott has the expertise and commitment to safety to help the NRC ensure the

Robinson plant is operated safely, protecting the public and the environment,” said NRC Region 

II Administrator Victor McCree. 

At least two NRC resident inspectors are assigned to each U.S. commercial nuclear plant. 

They serve as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major 

work projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. Resident inspectors can serve at 

one site for up to seven years. 

The Robinson resident inspectors can be reached at 843-383-4571. 

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No: II-11-049

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416

 August 24, 2011 

E-mail: OPA2.Resource@nrc.gov
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 95-30573

Summary Calendar

_____________________

PERCY BARTLEY,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

RICHARD P. IEYOUB, Attorney General,

State of Louisiana;

BURL CAIN, Acting Warden,

Respondents-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 94-CV-2547-M

_________________________________________________________________

February 23, 1996

Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Percy Bartley appeals from the district court's order denying

his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He

argues that his trial counsel was ineffective; that impermissibly

suggestive identification procedures were used; that the trial

judge vindictively imposed a severe sentence as punishment for

Bartley's refusal to accept a plea bargain; and that the sentence

was excessive and disproportionate. We have reviewed the record,
-2-

the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, and the district

court's order adopting the magistrate judge's report. We AFFIRM

for essentially the reasons given by the magistrate judge. Bartley

v. Ieyoub, No. 94-CV-2547-M (E.D. La. Dec. 5, 1994).

A F F I R M E D.
# L_2018256EN.01011701.xml

| 12.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 256/117 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 256/117

---

DECISION No 1/2018 OF THE ACP-EU COMMITTEE OF AMBASSADORS

of 28 September 2018

giving a discharge to the Director of the Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA) in respect of the implementation of its budget for the financial years 2001, 2002 and 2003 [2018/1525]

THE ACP-EU COMMITTEE OF AMBASSADORS,

Having regard to the Partnership agreement between the members of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part (1), and in particular Article 3(4) of Annex III thereto,

Having regard to Decision No 1/2000 of the ACP-EC Council of Ministers of 27 July 2000 regarding transitional measures valid from 2 August 2000 until the entry into force of the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement (2),

Having regard to the balance sheets of the Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation for the financial years 2001, 2002 and 2003, adopted on 31 December 2001, 31 December 2002 and 31 December 2003 respectively,

Having regard to the Auditors' reports on the Centre's accounts for the financial years 2001, 2002 and 2003,

Having taken note of the replies given by the Director of the Centre to the comments made by the Auditors,

Whereas:

| (1) | The revenue of the Centre for the financial years 2001, 2002 and 2003 consisted principally of contributions from the European Development Fund amounting to EUR 13 151 076, EUR 15 906 102 and EUR 14 880 000 respectively. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The revenue of the Centre for the financial years 2001, 2002 and 2003 consisted principally of contributions from the European Development Fund amounting to EUR 13 151 076, EUR 15 906 102 and EUR 14 880 000 respectively.

| (2) | The Director's overall implementation of the Centre's budgets during the financial years 2001, 2002 and 2003 were such that he should be given a discharge in respect of the implementation of those budgets, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Director's overall implementation of the Centre's budgets during the financial years 2001, 2002 and 2003 were such that he should be given a discharge in respect of the implementation of those budgets,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The Committee, on the basis of the Auditors' reports and the balance sheets for the corresponding financial years, hereby gives a discharge to the Director of the Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation in respect of the implementation of its budget for the financial years 2001, 2002 and 2003.

Done at Brussels, 28 September 2018.

For the ACP-EU Committee of Ambassadors

The Chairman

Ammo Aziza BAROUD

---

(1)  
  OJ L 317, 15.12.2000, p. 3.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 195, 1.8.2000, p. 46.

2

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

|                                |  |                       
|------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|Subsidiary Name                 |  | State of Incorporation
|                                |  |                       
|Avistar Systems Corporation (1) |  | Delaware              
|Collaboration Properties, Inc.  |  | Nevada                
|Avistar Systems (U.K.) Limited  |  | U.K.                  
|Avistar Corporation             |  | Delaware              
|Avistar Financial Corporation   |  | Delaware              



---

|(1) |  | In July 2001, the Board of Directors of Avistar Communications and the
board of directors of Avistar Systems approved the merger of Avistar
Systems, the wholly owned subsidiary of Avistar Communications, with and
into Avistar Communications. The merger was completed in July 2001.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
exv10w1



 





Exhibit 10.1




Summary of 2007 Non-Management Director Compensation



With the approval of The Williams Companies, Inc. 2007 Incentive Plan by the company’s
stockholders on May 17, 2007, the following compensation was awarded to the non-management
directors of The Williams Companies, Inc. on May 17, 2007:




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Annual Retainer	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Long-term
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	incentive
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Chair Retainers	 	Total fees paid in	 	(number of
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	and Special	 	cash or paid in	 	restricted stock
	 	 	Cash payment	 	Full value shares1	 	Committee fees	 	stock	 	units)2
	Kathleen B. Cooper
	 	$	75,000	 	 	$	35,010	 	 	 	—	 	 	$	110,010	 	 	 	3,000	 
	Irl F. Engelhardt
	 	$	75,000	 	 	$	35,010	 	 	 	—	 	 	$	110,010	 	 	 	3,000	 
	William R. Granberry
	 	$	75,000	 	 	$	35,010	 	 	 	—	 	 	$	110,010	 	 	 	3,000	 
	William E. Green3
	 	$	75,000	 	 	$	35,010	 	 	$	10,000	 	 	$	120,010	 	 	 	3,000	 
	Juanita H. Hinshaw4
	 	$	75,000	 	 	$	35,010	 	 	$	10,000	 	 	$	120,010	 	 	 	3,000	 
	W. R. Howell5
	 	$	75,000	 	 	$	35,010	 	 	$	30,000	 	 	$	140.010	 	 	 	3,000	 
	Charles M. Lillis6
	 	$	75,000	 	 	$	35,010	 	 	$	20,000	 	 	$	130,010	 	 	 	3,000	 
	George A. Lorch7
	 	$	75,000	 	 	$	35,010	 	 	$	20,000	 	 	$	130,010	 	 	 	3,000	 
	William G. Lowrie8
	 	$	75,000	 	 	$	35,010	 	 	$	15,000	 	 	$	125,010	 	 	 	3,000	 
	Frank T. MacInnis9
	 	$	75,000	 	 	$	35,010	 	 	$	10,000	 	 	$	120,010	 	 	 	3,000	 
	Janice D. Stoney
	 	$	75,000	 	 	$	35,010	 	 	 	—	 	 	$	110,010	 	 	 	3,000	 








 




			
	1	 	1,228 shares at $28.51 per share.
	 
	2	 	Payable May 17, 2010, or upon death or
other termination of service as a non-management director of the Company.
	 
	3	 	Special Litigation Committee fee
($10,000).
	 
	4	 	Special Litigation Committee fee
($10,000).
	 
	5	 	Lead Director fee ($20,000); Compensation
Committee chair fee ($10,000).
	 
	6	 	Special Litigation Committee fee
($10,000); Finance Committee chair fee ($10,000).
	 
	7	 	Special Litigation Committee fee
($10,000); Special Litigation Committee chair fee ($10,000).
	 
	8	 	Audit Committee chair fee ($15,000).
	 
	9	 	Nominating and Governance Committee chair
fee ($10,000).
SCWC

- 1 7

- 0000 006

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ‘ I

PATRICIA MORANZ , Petitioner /Plaintiff

- Appell ant ,

vs.

HARBOR MALL, LLC , Respondent /Defendant

- Appell ee

.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP

- 1 7

- 0000 006 ; CIVIL NO. 14

- 1

- 0172 )

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Petitioner Patricia Moranz ’s application for writ of

certiorari filed on March 18 , 202 1 , is hereby accepted

.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be
held in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant

to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai  i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move
for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ‘ i, May 13, 2021.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwa ld /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
/s/ Todd W. Eddins Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-17-0000006 13-MAY-2021 10:15 AM Dkt. 11 OGAC
#### § 894.814 Is a foster child included in the definition of TEI family member?

Generally, a foster child is excluded from coverage as they are not defined to be a *TEI family member.* However, a pre-adoptive child, adopted child, and an eligible ward in the legal custody of a *sponsor,* including a foster child who is a ward in the legal custody of a *sponsor,* are considered *TEI family members.*

[84 FR 26544 June 7, 2019]
#### Joseph F. Quinn, Respondent, v. Francis J. Anderson, Doing Business under the Name of the Old Homestead Bar & Grill, Appellant.

No opinion. Johnston, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
### SUBCHAPTER V—DIRECT HOUSING LOANS FOR NATIVE AMERICAN VETERANS

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–233, title I, §103(f)(1), June 15, 2006, 120 Stat. 400, substituted "DIRECT HOUSING LOANS FOR NATIVE AMERICAN VETERANS" for "NATIVE AMERICAN VETERAN HOUSING LOAN PILOT PROGRAM" in subchapter heading.
# L_2023106EN.01005001.xml

| 20.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 106/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 106/50

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 251/2022

of 23 September 2022

amending Annex IX (Financial services) to the EEA Agreement [2023/780]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/551 of 4 April 2022 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/85 on the equivalence to the requirements of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of the regulatory framework of the United States of America for central counterparties that are authorised and supervised by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/551 of 4 April 2022 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/85 on the equivalence to the requirements of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of the regulatory framework of the United States of America for central counterparties that are authorised and supervised by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex IX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex IX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 31bcaz (Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/85) of Annex IX to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32022 D 0551: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/551 of 4 April 2022 (OJ L 107, 6.4.2022, p. 82).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32022 D 0551: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/551 of 4 April 2022 (OJ L 107, 6.4.2022, p. 82).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/551 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 24 September 2022, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 23 September 2022.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kristján Andri STEFÁNSSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 107, 6.4.2022, p. 82.

1

(*)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*

---
No. IV-11-007

Contact: Victor Dricks Phone: (817) 860-8128

 Lara Uselding Phone (817) 917-0321

 

 March 21, 2011

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov 

NRC SENDS SPECIAL INSPECTION TEAM TO CALLAWAY NUCLEAR PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has begun a special inspection at the Callaway 

nuclear plant to review the circumstances surrounding the lubrication of an auxiliary feedwater 

pump. The plant, operated by Ameren Missouri, is located near Fulton, Mo.

Inspectors, who began their work today, will identify the circumstances surrounding an 

oil sample taken on Feb.8 indicating that the pump might have been inadequately lubricated. In 

addition, they will review the licensee’s response to the event and its evaluation of the 

operability of the pump. The pump is used to supply water to the plant’s steam generators during 

some accident conditions.

The oil sample was discolored and contained particulate indicating that the oil level may 

have been too low to properly lubricate the pump bearing. The pump may not have been able to 

run for a sufficient length of time to meet its safety function during an accident scenario.

NRC staff decided that a special inspection was appropriate due to a previous event in 2009 

involving inadequate lubrication in the same system. 

The NRC inspectors will write an inspection report on their findings within 45 days of 

the end of the inspection that will be publicly available.

###

NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125

Telephone: (817) 860-8128

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov