alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.24  Repayment Agreement I  Party A:
        Inner Mongolia Gold Horse Industry Group Co. (Also know  as Jin Ma Group)
 Party B:
        Inner Mongolia Jin Ma Hotel Co., Ltd.
  Based on discussion of Board of Directors of Gold Horse International Inc, two parties: Inner Mongolia Gold Horse Industry Group and Inner Mongolia Jin Ma Hotel Co., Ltd. now execute and enter into this Repayment Agreement. It is now agreed as follows about loan to Inner Mongolia Gold Horse Industry Group from Inner Mongolia Jin Ma Hotel Co., Ltd amounting to 9,432,226.13 RMB:  I:  It is agreed that Inner Mongolia Gold Horse Industry Group will pay 4.50 million RMB to Inner Mongolia Jin Ma Hotel Co., Ltd before 30th September 2008.  II:  It is further agreed that Inner Mongolia Gold Horse Industry Group will pay 2 million RMB to Inner Mongolia Jin Ma Hotel Co., Ltd before October 2008, pay 1.50 million RMB before November, and pay 1,432,223.13 RMB before December.  This Repayment Agreement is binding upon two parties, and become effective since it is signed. It will be duplicated and each party holds one.  Seal:  Party A:
        Inner Mongolia Gold Horse Industry Group
 Date: 18th, July, 2008  Party B:
        Inner Mongolia Jin Ma Hotel Co., Ltd.
 Date: 18th, July, 2008   Repayment Agreement II




Party A:
        Inner Mongolia Gold Horse Industry Group Co. (Also known as Jin Ma Group)



Party B:
        Inner Mongolia Jin Ma Construction Co., Ltd.



Based on discussion of Board of Directors of Gold Horse International Inc, two parties: Inner Mongolia Gold Horse Industry Group and Inner Mongolia Jin Ma Construction Co., Ltd now execute and enter into this Repayment Agreement. It is now agreed as follows about loan from Inner Mongolia Gold Horse Industry Group to Inner Mongolia Jin Ma Construction Co., Ltd amounting to 2,788,425 RMB:



I:  It is agreed that Inner Mongolia Gold Horse Industry Group will pay 2.50 million RMB to Inner Mongolia Jin Ma Construction Co., Ltd before September 2008.



II:  It is further agreed that Inner Mongolia Gold Horse Industry Group will pay the rest of the money to Inner Mongolia Jin Ma Construction Co., Ltd before December 2008.



This Repayment Agreement is binding upon two parties, and become effective since it is signed. It will be duplicated and each party holds one.



Corporate Seal:




Party A:
        Inner Mongolia Gold Horse Industry Group

Date: 18th, July, 2008




Party B:
        Inner Mongolia Jin Ma Construction Co., Ltd.

Date: 18th, July, 2008
§ 1014.2 Definitions. As used in this part: ( a ) *Individual* means a person who is a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence.
( b ) *Privacy Act* means the Privacy Act of 1974 (Pub. L. 93-579).
( c ) *Record* means any item of personal information relating to an individual, such as educational, employment, financial or medical information.
( d ) *Statistical record* means a record in a system of records maintained for statistical research or reporting purposes only and not used in whole or in part in making any determination about an identifiable individual.
( e ) System of records or records systems means a group of records maintained by the Commission from which information may be retrieved by the name of an individual or some other individual identifier.
( f ) *Maintain* includes the collection, use, storage, and dissemination of information.
Exhibit 32.1


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Bayview  Corporation (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ended  November  30,  2004 as  filed  with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:


1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  February 18, 2005



/s/ Luigi Federico
---------------------------------------
Luigi Federico, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
NRC NAMES NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT CALVERT CLIFFS NUCLEAR PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia, Pa., have 

selected Edgardo Torres as the new resident inspector at the Calvert Cliffs 

nuclear power plant in Lusby, Md. Torres joins Senior Resident Inspector Silas 

Kennedy at the two-unit site, which is operated by Constellation Energy Nuclear 

Group.

Torres joined the NRC’s Region II office in Atlanta in 2007 as a project engineer in the 

resident inspector development program. Since November 2008 he has worked as a project 

engineer in the Region I office in King of Prussia. During that time, he has filled-in for extended 

periods of time as a resident inspector at both the Salem and Susquehanna nuclear power plants. 

Torres earned a bachelor’s degree in chemical engineering from the University of Puerto 

Rico Mayaguez Campus. He also served as a submarine officer in the United States Navy.

“Edgardo has the training, experience and commitment to safety that will help the NRC 

carry out its mission of protecting people and the environment, and ensure the safe operation of 

Calvert Cliffs,” said NRC Region I Administrator Bill Dean.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant site has at least two NRC Resident Inspectors. 

They serve as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting regular inspections, 

monitoring significant work projects, and interacting with plant workers and the public. 

Inspectors can work for up to seven years at any one site.

The Calvert Cliffs resident inspectors can be reached at 410-586-2626.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region I 

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov 

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. I-11-041

Contact: Diane Screnci (610) 337-5330

 Neil Sheehan (610) 337-5331

November 14, 2011

Email: opa1.resource@nrc.gov
### §3684. Limitations

Except as provided in section 3627 of this title, no provision of this chapter shall be construed to give authority to the Governors to make any change in any provision of this title.

(Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 765; Pub. L. 99–410, title II, §201(b)(4), Aug. 28, 1986, 100 Stat. 929; Pub. L. 109–435, title X, §1010(f), Dec. 20, 2006, 120 Stat. 3262.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–435 substituted "of this title" for "of section 3682 or 3683 or chapter 30, 32, or 34 of this title".

1986—Pub. L. 99–410 struck out ", or of the Federal Voting Assistance Act of 1955" after "or 34 of this title".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1986 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–410 applicable with respect to elections taking place after Dec. 31, 1987, see section 204 of Pub. L. 99–410, set out as an Effective Date note under section 20301 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 20, 1971, pursuant to Resolution No. 71–10 of the Board of Governors. See section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note preceding section 101 of this title.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL
                          FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bekem Metals, Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, James
Gunnell, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



Date: August 22, 2005                                /s/ James Gunnell
                                                   ---------------------------
                                                   James Gunnell,
                                                   Principal Financial Officer
Unassociated Document


    AMENDMENT
      TO

    


    STOCK
      TRANSFER AGREEMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 3, 005

    


    AND

    


    AMENDMENT
      TO STOCK TRANSFER CONTRACT DATED JANUARY 28, 

    2006

    


    This
      Amendment to a Stock Transfer Contract dated September 3, 2005, and to an
      Amendment to A Stock Transfer Contract dated January 28th,
      2006
      (Agreements) between Indigo-Energy, Inc., successor to Indigo Land and
      Development, Inc. (Company) and James C. Love IV (Shareholder), and is hereby
      amended to acceptance of a payment schedule from the Company to Shareholder
      as
      follows:

    


    
      	
              Date
                Due

            	 	
              Payment
                Amount

            	 
	
              July
                5, 2006

            	 	
              $

            	
              25,000

            	 
	
              August
                1, 2006

            	 	
              $

            	
              50,000

            	 
	
              September
                1, 2006

            	 	
              $

            	
              50,000

            	 
	
              October
                1, 2006

            	 	
              $

            	
              50,000

            	 
	
              TOTAL

            	 	
              $

            	
              175,000

            	 


    

    


    Should
      there be any cause or problem with the above payment schedule being paid to
      Shareholder by Indigo-Energy, Inc. then Shareholder will retain any and all
      monies paid to him as liquidated damages and get back his stock initially sold
      to the Treasuary.

    


    Receipt
      of final payment (October 1, 2006 total dollars paid $175,000) in accordance
      to
      the above schedule will constitute payment in full for all claims from the
      above
      referenced Agreements and any and all claims of any nature by Shareholder
      against Company and satisfy all of the requirements of the Agreements in
      full

     

    
      	 	 	 	 
	\s\
              James C. Love
              IV	 	 	7-5-06
	
              

            	 	 	date
	James
              C. Love IV,
              and individual	 	 	 


    

    
      	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	Accepted
              by the Company:	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	\s\
              David J. Larson	 	 	7-5-06
	
              

            	 	 	date
	David
              J. Larson, President
#### Aleda S. Phinny, Respondent, v. George T. Hay and Frederick C. Lockhart, Appellants.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The provision thereon as to striking out the denials in paragraph 10 of the answer does not preclude the defendants to plead denials of the existence of any fact alleged in the complaint in order “ to *946perfect the answer as a complete affirmative defense.” *(See Einstein v. Einstein,*158 App. Div. 500; *Douglass*v. *Phenix Ins. Co.,*138 N. Y. 216.) Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Oarr, Mills and ¡Rich, JJ., concurred.
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the amended annual report of Tranquility, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report"), I, Dominick Pope, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/Dominick Pope Dominick Pope, Principal Financial Officer Date: August 12, 2009
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company.  The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated.  The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors.  Comments must be received not later than December 3, 2004.

**A.  Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City**                     (Donna J. Ward, Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:                

*1.  Embry W. Williams, Jr.*, Amarillo, Texas; to acquire additional voting shares of Union BancShares, Inc., Clayton, New Mexico, and thereby indirectly acquire additional voting shares of First National Bank of New Mexico, Clayton, New Mexico.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 15, 2004.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 04-25689 Filed 11-18-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
NRC ISSUES SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT WITH OPEN ITEMS FOR

DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR PLANT LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued its Safety Evaluation Report (SER) 

with Open Items for the proposed renewal of the operating license for the Davis-Besse Nuclear 

Power Station in Oak Harbor, Ohio.

FirstEnergy Nuclear Operation Co. (FENOC) submitted an application to the NRC in 

August 2010 to extend the Davis-Besse license by 20 years. The current 40-year operating 

license is due to expire on April 22, 2017.

The SER documents the results of the NRC staff’s review of the license renewal 

application and site audit of Davis-Besse’s aging-management programs to address the safety of 

plant operations during the period of extended operation. Overall, the results show that FENOC 

has identified actions that have been or will be taken to manage the effects of aging in the 

appropriate systems, structures and components of the plant, and that their functions will be 

maintained during the period of extended operation.

The SER contains four open items: management of shield building cracks during the

period of extended operation; operating experience review prior to entering the period of 

extended operation; time-limited aging analyses of reactor vessel neutron embrittlement; and 

pressure-temperature limits.

After FENOC provides satisfactory information to resolve the four open items, the NRC 

staff will present its final conclusions on the license renewal application in an update to this 

SER. The staff expects to issue that update in October. 

The SER with Open Items on the Davis-Besse license renewal application is available on 

the NRC website.

The SER and the license renewal application have also been provided to the NRC’s 

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS), an independent body of experts that 

advises the NRC on reactor safety matters. An ACRS subcommittee is expected to discuss the 

SER with open items during a meeting on Sept. 19. The meeting, which will take place at NRC 

Headquarters in Rockville, Md., will be open to the public and will be announced on the NRC 

website’s public meetings page. The full ACRS will later issue a report discussing the results of 

its review.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 12-087 August 1, 2012
Additional information on license renewal in general and the Davis-Besse application in 

particular can be found on the NRC website.

###

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand.

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)   In connection with the amended quarterly Report of Hitor Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Ken Martin, CEO and CAO of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   [exhibit32002.gif]   Ken Martin, CEO, CAO Dated:  November 19, 2010
### SUBCHAPTER IV—CONSTRUCTION AND MODERNIZATION OF HOSPITALS AND OTHER MEDICAL FACILITIES
#### § 930.71 Federal license or permit activity described in detail.

The term “federal license or permit activity described in detail” means any activity requiring a federal license or permit, as defined in § 930.51, which the Secretary of the Interior determines must be described in detail within an OCS plan.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 209 ) ll-K - (I ) -2 2 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:55AM Sheet 209 of 325P. 2

ANALYSI S O F KE

YECONOMI C TES T PARAMETER S I N TH E POWERPLAN T AND INDUSTRIAL FUE L US E ACT . EEA , Inc . II-K-(I)-2 2

Januar y 26 , 1979 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUND I

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(I)-2 2
No: IV-13-014 May 16, 2013

CONTACT: Victor Dricks (817) 200-1128

 Lara Uselding (817) 200-1519

NRC To Discuss 2012 Performance Assessment for Columbia Generating Station

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet in Richland, Wash., on June 4, with 

representatives of Energy Northwest to discuss the agency’s 2012 assessment of safety performance 

for the Columbia Generating Station. The plant is located 12 miles northwest of Richland.

The meeting, which will be open to the public, is scheduled to begin at 5:30 p.m. in the 

Walkley Room of the Energy Northwest Training Center, 3000 George Washington Way, Richland.

In addition to the performance assessment, the NRC staff will be available to answer 

questions from the public on the safety performance of Columbia Generating Station, as well as the 

NRC’s role in ensuring safe plant operation.

“The NRC continually reviews the performance of Columbia Generating Station and the 

nation’s other commercial nuclear power facilities,” NRC Region IV Administrator Arthur T. 

Howell said.” This meeting will provide an opportunity for a discussion of our annual assessment of 

safety performance with the company and with local officials and residents who live near the 

plant.”

A letter sent from the NRC Region IV office to plant officials addresses the performance 

of the plant during 2012 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. 

The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess

nuclear plant performance. The colors start with green and then increase to white, yellow, or red, 

commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. Performance indicators are 

statistical measurements of plant and equipment performance. The NRC’s action matrix reflects 

overall plant performance and agency response. There are five columns in the matrix with Column 

1 requiring a baseline level of inspections. A move to the other columns results in an increased level 

of NRC oversight and inspections.

Columbia Generating Station was in Column 3, the degraded cornerstone column of the 

NRC’s action matrix during 2012, but was returned to Column 1 on May 14, 2013, after a 

supplemental inspection determined that appropriate corrective actions had been taken to address 

deficiencies related to emergency preparedness.
Page | 2

As a result, Columbia Generating Station will receive the normal level of oversight for the 

rest of 2013. Inspections are performed by two NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant, 

inspection specialists from the Region IV office in Arlington, Texas, and specialists from the 

agency’s headquarters in Rockville, Md.

Information about the plant’s current performance is available on the NRC website.
### Part B—Financial Distress Grants
#### § 1.41 Limited antitrust exemption.

The Export Trade Act authorizes the organization and operation of export trade associations, and extends to them certain limited exemptions from the Sherman Act and the Clayton Act. It also extends the jurisdiction of the Commission under the Federal Trade Commission Act to unfair methods of competition used in export trade against competitors engaged in export trade, even though the acts constituting such unfair methods are done without the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.