alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No: III-13-025 July 2, 2013

CONTACT: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663

NRC Will Hold an Open House on 2013 Monticello Nuclear Power Plant Performance 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold an open house July 9 to discuss the agency’s 

assessment of the Monticello nuclear plant’s safety performance for last year. The plant is located in 

Monticello, Minn., approximately 30 miles northwest of Minneapolis.

During the open house, which is scheduled for 4-6 p.m. at the Monticello Community Center, 

505 Walnut St., in Monticello, attendees will have an opportunity to hold one-on-one discussions 

with NRC staff members about the plant’s 2012 performance and the agency’s oversight of the 

facility. NRC staff on hand will include the inspectors assigned to the plant on a full-time basis, and staff 

from the Region III Office in Lisle, Ill.

The assessment letter sent from the NRC Region III office to plant officials addresses the 

performance of the plant during 2012 and will serve as the basis for the discussion.

Overall, the Monticello plant operated safely during 2012. At the conclusion of last year, all 

performance indicators and inspection findings for the facility were green, or of very low risk. As a 

result, Monticello will continue to receive the NRC’s normal level of oversight during 2013.

“When the NRC evaluates the performance of the Monticello plant for the previous year, we take 

a look at any and all issues that might be of concern,” said Region III Administrator Charles Casto. 

“Then we map out our inspection plans for that specific facility, issue inspection reports and hold public 

meetings near the plant in order to discuss our oversight and answer questions from local residents.”

The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess nuclear 

plant performance. The colors start with green and then increase to white, yellow, or red, commensurate 

with the safety significance of the issues involved. Performance indicators are statistical measurements 

of plant and equipment performance. 

Inspections are performed by two NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant and by 

specialist inspectors from the Region III Office in Lisle, Ill., and the agency’s headquarters in Rockville, 

Md. Among the areas of performance to be inspected this year by NRC specialists are activities 

associated with radiological safety, independent spent fuel storage, emergency preparedness and fire 

protection.

The most current performance assessment for Monticello is available on the NRC website.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 7, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 13607]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5434]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), announcement is made of a Health Care 
Policy and Research Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting.

    A Special Emphasis Panel is a group of experts in fields related 
to health care research who are invited by the Agency for Healthcare 
Research and Quality (AHRQ), and agree to be available, to conduct 
on an as needed basis, scientific reviews of applications for AHRQ 
support. Individual members of the Panel do not attend regularly-
scheduled meetings and do not serve for fixed terms or a long period 
of time. Rather, they are asked to participate in particular review 
meetings which require their type of expertise.
    Substantial segments of the upcoming SEP meeting listed below 
will be closed to the public in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, section 10(d) of 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2 and 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(6). Grant applications for the Research Centers in Primary 
Care Practice Based Research and Learning (P30) applications are to 
be reviewed and discussed at this meeting. These discussions are 
likely to reveal personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the applications. This information is exempt from 
mandatory disclosure under the above-cited statutes.
    SEP Meeting on: Research Centers in Primary Care Practice Based 
Research and Learning (P30).
    Date: March 29, 2012 (Open on March 29 from 8 a.m. to 8:15 a.m. 
and closed for the remainder of the meeting).
    Place: Gaithersburg Marriott Washingtonian Center, 9751 
Washingtonian Boulevard, Gaithersburg, MD 20850.
    Contact Person: Anyone wishing to obtain a roster of members, 
agenda or minutes of the non-confidential portions of this meeting 
should contact Mrs. Bonnie Campbell, Committee Management Officer, 
Office of Extramural Research, Education and Priority Populations, 
AHRQ, 540 Gaither Road, Room 2038, Rockville, Maryland 20850, 
Telephone (301) 427-1554.
    Agenda items for this meeting are subject to change as priorities 
dictate.

    Dated: February 27, 2012.
Carolyn M. Clancy,
Director.
[FR Doc. 2012-5434 Filed 3-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-M
```
SW-846 Update V Abstract - 1 Revision 3 

 October 2012

ABSTRACT 

Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods (SW-846) provides test 

procedures and guidance which are recommended for use in conducting the evaluations and 

measurements needed to comply with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), 

Public Law 94-580, as amended. These methods are approved by the U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency for obtaining data to satisfy the requirements of 40 Code of Federal 

Regulations (CFR) Parts 122 through 270 promulgated under RCRA, as amended. This manual 

presents the state-of-the-art in routine analytical testing adapted for the RCRA program. It 

contains procedures for field and laboratory quality control, sampling, determining hazardous 

constituents in wastes, determining the hazardous characteristics of wastes (toxicity, ignitability, 

reactivity, and corrosivity), and for determining physical properties of wastes. It also contains 

guidance on how to select appropriate methods. 

 Several of the hazardous waste regulations under Subtitle C of RCRA require that specific 

testing methods described in SW-846 be employed for certain applications. Refer to 40 CFR Parts 

260 through 270, for those specific requirements. Any reliable analytical method may be used to 

meet other requirements under Subtitle C of RCRA.
### §40103. Purposes

The purposes of the corporation are as provided in the articles of incorporation and include a continuing commitment, on a national basis, to—

(1) preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States and the laws of the States;

(2) commemorate the wars, campaigns, and military actions of the United States to reflect profound respect, high honor, and great tribute on the glorious dead and the surviving veterans of those wars, campaigns, and actions and to give all Americans a greater understanding of and appreciation for the sacrifices of those who participated in them for all Americans;

(3) stimulate to the highest degree possible the interests of the entire Nation in the problems of veterans, their widows, and orphans;

(4) cooperate to the fullest extent and in a harmonious manner with all veterans' organizations in common projects designed to serve the interests of all veterans of all wars in which the United States has participated;

(5) collate, preserve, and encourage the study of historical episodes, chronicles, mementos, and events pertaining to the wars, campaigns, and military actions of the United States;

(6) inculcate an enduring love of country, a deep and abiding sense of patriotism, and a profound commitment to Americanism among all the people of the United States;

(7) encourage, among the youth of our Nation, respect for our national flag, our anthem, and the traditions of America;

(8) preserve the freedoms of all the people, national peace, prosperity, tranquility, good will, the permanence of free institutions, and the defense of the United States;

(9) foster the association of veterans of the Catholic faith who have served in the Armed Forces of the United States;

(10) encourage morality in government, labor, management, economic, social, fraternal, and all other phases of American life;

(11) promote the realization that the family is the basic unit of society;

(12) increase our love, honor, and service to God and to our fellow man without regard to race, creed, color, or national origin; and

(13) function as a veterans' and patriotic organization as authorized by the laws of each State in which it is incorporated.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1329; Pub. L. 109–284, §5(6), Sept. 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 1212.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 40103 | 36:2603. | Aug. 17, 1984, Pub. L. 98–382, §3, 98 Stat. 1343. |

Section

Before clause (1), the word "objects" is omitted as included in "purposes".

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Par. (13). Pub. L. 109–284 substituted "laws of each State" for "laws of the each State".
#### § 0.735-3 Applicability.

This part applies to all persons included within the term “employee” as defined in § 0.735-4, except as otherwise provided in this part.
### §601. Mississippi River; regulation of reservoirs at headwaters

It shall be the duty of the Secretary of the Army to prescribe such rules and regulations in respect to the use and administration of the reservoirs at the headwaters of the Mississippi River as in his judgment the public interest and necessity may require; which rules and regulations shall be posted in some conspicuous place or places for the information of the public. And any person knowingly and willfully violating such rules and regulations shall be liable to a fine not exceeding $500, or imprisonment, not exceeding six months, the same to be enforced by prosecution in any district court of the United States within whose territorial jurisdiction such offense may have been committed. And the Secretary of the Army shall cause such gaugings to be made at or near Saint Paul during the annual operation of said reservoirs as shall determine accurately the discharge at that point, the cost of same to be paid out of the annual appropriation for gauging the waters of the Mississippi River and its tributaries.

(Aug. 11, 1888, ch. 860, §1, 25 Stat. 419; July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §205(a), 61 Stat. 501.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is from act Aug. 11, 1888, the River and Harbor Appropriation Act of 1888.

In the original text the words "said reservoirs" appeared instead of "reservoirs at the headwaters of the Mississippi river." The provision from which this section is derived, however, followed an appropriation "for continuing operations upon the reservoirs at the headwaters of the Mississippi river."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Department of War designated Department of the Army and title of Secretary of War changed to Secretary of the Army by section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, 61 Stat. 501. Section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, was repealed by section 53 of act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 641. Section 1 of act Aug. 10, 1956, enacted "Title 10, Armed Forces" which in sections 3010 to 3013 continued Department of the Army under administrative supervision of Secretary of the Army.
#### Primo Picchioni, Respondent, v. City of New York, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Townley, Glen-non, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
----

| By:    |                                                 |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                                 |   |
|   | /s/ Brent M. Boyles                                  |   |
|   | Brent      M. Boyles                                 |   |
|   | President and Chief Executive      Officer           |   |
|   |                                                 |   |
|   |                                                 |   |
|   | /s/ Michael I. Williams                              |   |
|   | Michael      I. Williams                             |   |
|   | Senior      Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, |   |
|   | Treasurer      and Assistant Secretary               |   |

----
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Mary L. Pregon, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[820 NYS2d 178]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 3, 2005, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant worked as a clerk at a retail store. In July 2004, she traveled to Florida for a planned two-week trip during which she intended to take care of certain matters pertaining to her mother’s estate. When she experienced problems with the estate, claimant called her employer and left a message advising that she would be unable to return to work on the date scheduled. In response, the employer left a message on claimant’s cell phone stating that if she did not return to work at the scheduled time, she would be terminated. Claimant, in turn, left a second message stating that she was sorry that things did not work out. She was subsequently disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits on the ground that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Claimant appeals.

We affirm. It is undisputed that, after receiving the message on her cell phone, claimant did not attempt to speak with her manager to explain her predicament or work out a solution that would allow her to keep her job. Rather, she assumed that her manager did not care about her personal problems and that she would be fired. Inasmuch as claimant failed to take reasonable steps to protect her job, substantial evidence supports the *651Board’s finding that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause *(see Matter of Jacobs [Commissioner of Labor],*13 AD3d 963, 964 [2004]; *Matter of Perez [Commissioner of Labor],*7 AD3d 906, 907-908 [2004]).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
### SUBCHAPTER III—DEFINITIONS AND REPORTS
#### § 971.701 Criteria for safety of life and property at sea.

Response to the safety at sea requirements in essence will involve vessel inspection requirements, as identified by present laws and regulations. The primary inspection statutes pertaining to United States flag vessels are: 46 App. U.S.C. 86 (Loadlines) and 46 U.S.C. 3301 (Inspection of Seagoing Barges, Seagoing Motor Vessels, and Freight Vessels). United States flag vessels will be required to meet all applicable regulatory requirements, including the requirement for a current valid Coast Guard Certificate of Inspection (pursuant to § 971.205(a)). United States flag vessels are under United States jurisdiction on the high seas and subject to domestic enforcement procedures. With respect to foreign flag vessels, the SOLAS 74 or SOLAS 60 certificate requirements specified in § 971.205(b) apply.
#### Carl H. Haas, Appellant, v. James Brown, Respondent.

Judgment insofar as appealed from and order reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and verdict of the jury reinstated. Memorandum: The court having submitted the issue of the extent of damages to the jury without objection, the sufficiency of the complaint in that regard could not be tested upon a motion for a new trial. The jury having returned a verdict in the amount testified to by the mechanic who repaired plaintiff’s car, it was error for the court to disregard this sum and reduce the verdict to six cents. We also feel that the court was in error in refusing to grant the motion to amend the complaint to conform to the proof which was admitted without objection. All concur. (Appeal from part of a judgment for plaintiff for $267, which verdict was reduced to six cents by an order of the court, in an automobile negligence action.) Present — MeCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.
### §621. Definitions

In this subchapter:

(1) Administrator.—The term "Administrator" means the Administrator of General Services.

(2) Council.—The term "Council" means the Federal Real Property Council established by section 623(a).

(3) Director.—The term "Director" means the Director of the Office of Management and Budget.

(4) Federal agency.—The term "Federal agency" means—

(A) an executive department or independent establishment in the executive branch of the Government; or

(B) a wholly owned Government corporation (other than the United States Postal Service).

(5) Field office.—The term "field office" means any office of a Federal agency that is not the headquarters office location for the Federal agency.

(6) Postal property.—The term "postal property" means any property owned or leased by the United States Postal Service.

(7) Public-private partnership.—The term "public-private partnership" means any partnership or working relationship between a Federal agency and a corporation, individual, or nonprofit organization for the purpose of financing, constructing, operating, managing, or maintaining one or more Federal real property assets.

(8) Underutilized property.—The term "underutilized property" means a portion or the entirety of any real property, including any improvements, that is used—

(A) irregularly or intermittently by the accountable Federal agency for program purposes of the Federal agency; or

(B) for program purposes that can be satisfied only with a portion of the property.

(Added Pub. L. 114–318, §3(a), Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1608.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Purpose

Pub. L. 114–318, §2, Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1608, provided that: "The purpose of this Act [see section 1 of Pub. L. 114–318, set out as a Short Title of 2016 Amendment note under section 101 of this title] is to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the Federal Government in managing property of the Federal Government by—

"(1) requiring the United States Postal Service to take appropriate measures to better manage and account for property;

"(2) providing for increased collocation with Postal Service facilities and guidance on Postal Service leasing practices; and

"(3) establishing a Federal Real Property Council to develop guidance on and ensure the implementation of strategies for better managing Federal property."
### **CHAPTER 30—NONMAILABLE MATTER**

Sec.
3001.
Nonmailable matter.
3002.
Nonmailable motor vehicle master keys.
3002a.
Nonmailability of locksmithing devices.
3003.
Mail bearing a fictitious name or address.
3004.
Delivery of mail to persons not residents of the place of address.
3005.
False representations; lotteries.
[3006.
Repealed.]
3007.
Detention of mail for temporary periods.
3008.
Prohibition of pandering advertisements.
3009.
Mailing of unordered merchandise.
3010.
Mailing of sexually oriented advertisements.
3011.
Judicial enforcement.
3012.
Civil penalties.
3013.
Semiannual reports on investigative activities of the Postal Service.
3014.
Nonmailable plants.
3015.
Nonmailable plant pests and injurious animals.
3016.
Administrative subpoenas.
3017.
Nonmailable skill contests or sweepstakes matter; notification to prohibit mailings.
3018.
Hazardous material.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2006**—Pub. L. 109–435, title X, §1008(c)(2), Dec. 20, 2006, 120 Stat. 3260, added item 3018.

**1999**—Pub. L. 106–168, title I, §§105(b)(1), 107(d), 108(b), Dec. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1811, 1814, 1816, repealed item 3006 "Unlawful matter" and added items 3016 and 3017.

**1992**—Pub. L. 102–393, title VI, §631(d)(2), Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1776, added item 3015.

**1988**—Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7090(b), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4410, added item 3002a.

Pub. L. 100–574, §1(a)(2), Oct. 31, 1988, 102 Stat. 2893, added item 3014.

**1983**—Pub. L. 98–186, §3(c), Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1317, added items 3012 and 3013.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Jacob Glass, Defendant. Peerless Casualty Company, Respondent.

Consideration of all factors leads to the conclusion that remission of the forfeiture was an improvident exercise of discretion. The willful default herein, and the effect thereof, tending, as it does, to bring the administration of justice into disrepute, may not be disregarded. *(People*v. *Rigby,*293 N. Y. 912; *People*v. *Schwarze,*168 App. Div. 124, 126; *People*v. *Licenziata,*230 App. Div. 358, affd. 256 N. Y. 534; *People*v. *Angolette,*267 App. Div. 996.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
### **CHAPTER 179—ALASKA FEDERAL-CIVILIAN ENERGY EFFICIENCY SWAP**

Sec.
17901.
Definitions.
17902.
Sale of electric energy.
17903.
Purchase of electric power.
17904.
Implementation powers and limitations.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 24, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 68327]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25983]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Force Protection in 
Urban and Unconventional Environments will meet in closed session on 
December 1-2, 2004, at Fort Irwin, CA; 29 Palms, CA; and March Air 
Reserve Base, CA. This Task Force will review and evaluate force 
protection capabilities in urban and unconventional environments and 
provide recommendations to effect change to the future Joint Force.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they 
affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. Specifically, 
the Task Force's foci will be to evaluate force protection in the 
context of post major combat operations that have been conducted in 
Iraq and Afghanistan. In the operations, loss of national treasure--
military and civilian, U.S. and other nations--has resulted from 
actions executed by non-state and rogue actors. The threat and 
capabilities these insurgent, terrorist and criminal actions present 
post a most serious challenge to our ability to achieve unified action.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. 2), it has been 
determined that these Defense Science Board Task Force meetings concern 
matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and that, accordingly, these 
meetings will be closed to the public.
    Due to scheduling difficulties, there is insufficient time to 
provide timely notice required by Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act and Sec.  101-6.1015(b) of the GSA Final Rule on 
Federal Advisory Committee Management, 41 CFR Part 101-6, which further 
requires publication at least 15 calendar days prior to the meeting.

    Dated: November 17, 2004.
Jeannette Owings-Ballard,
OSD Federal Register, Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 04-25983 Filed 11-23-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P