alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2550 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2550

To amend the American Servicemembers' Protection Act of 2002 to provide 
clarification with respect to the eligibility of certain countries for 
                   United States military assistance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 19, 2003

 Mr. Shimkus (for himself, Mr. Hunter, Mr. Skelton, and Mr. Oberstar) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                        International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the American Servicemembers' Protection Act of 2002 to provide 
clarification with respect to the eligibility of certain countries for 
                   United States military assistance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY OF CERTAIN COUNTRIES FOR UNITED STATES MILITARY 
              ASSISTANCE.

    (a) Amendment.--Section 2007(d)(1) of the American Servicemembers' 
Protection Act of 2002 (title II of Public Law 107-206) is amended by 
adding at the end before the semicolon the following: ``or a country 
that has concluded a protocol with NATO for the accession of the 
country to NATO''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on July 1, 2003.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Silver Star Energy,  Inc. on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004,  as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Robert McIntosh,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/    Robert McIntosh
Robert McIntosh
President, CEO and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


May 14, 2004


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00852-CR

Gregory Lopez, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, 207TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. CR2012-396, HONORABLE GARY L. STEEL, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R A N D M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

On September 19, 2014, this Court granted appellant’s second motion for extension

of time to file appellant’s brief and ordered that appellant’s brief be filed no later than November 17,

2014. In this Court’s order, we notified appellant’s appointed counsel that a failure to comply with

the order would result in the referral of this case to the trial court for a hearing under Rule 38.8(b)

of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. To date, the brief has not been filed.

We therefore abate the cause and remand it to the trial court to hold a hearing in

accordance with Rule 38.8. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). The trial court shall conduct a

hearing to determine whether appellant still wishes to prosecute this appeal and, if so, whether

appointed counsel has abandoned the appeal. See id. The trial court shall make appropriate findings

and recommendations. If appellant desires to appeal and present counsel is not prepared to prosecute

this appeal in a timely fashion, the court shall appoint substitute counsel who will effectively
represent appellant on appeal. See id. Following the hearing, the trial court shall order the

appropriate supplemental reporter’s and clerk’s records, including any order and findings, to be

prepared and forwarded to the Clerk of this Court no later than December 19, 2014. See id.

It is so ordered this 4th day of December 2014.

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Field

Abated and Remanded

Filed: December 4, 2014

Do Not Publish

2
###### Editorial Note on Subpart C of Part 9701

#### Editorial Note:

At 73 FR 58435, Oct. 7, 2008, the application of subpart C to part 9701 was rescinded.

#### § 9701.344 Special within-band increases.

DHS may issue implementing directives regarding special within-band basic pay increases for employees within a Full Performance or higher band established under § 9701.212 who possess exceptional skills in critical areas or who make exceptional contributions to mission accomplishment or in other circumstances determined by DHS. Increases under this section are in addition to any performance pay increases made under § 9701.342 and may be made effective at any time. Special within-band increases may not be based on length of service.
NRC SCHEDULES PUBLIC MEETING JUNE 21 TO DISCUSS IMPLEMENTING 

REVISIONS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION REGULATIONS RULE

FOR LICENSE RENEWAL OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a meeting for Tuesday, June 21, 

from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m., to discuss the implementation of a final rule revising the environmental 

protection regulations for the renewal of nuclear power plant operating licenses and other 

environmental review issues. 

NRC staff will begin the meeting with a presentation on implementing the rule. Then 

industry will provide a presentation followed by an opportunity for open discussion. The public 

is invited to participate in this meeting. 

The meeting will be held at the NRC Headquarters, 11555 Rockville Pike, room 

O13G04. A complete agenda is available on the NRC’s public meeting schedule Web page. 

More information and all associated documents about the final rule can be found at 

regulations.gov website by using the docket identification NRC-2008-0608 as the keyword.

Anyone with questions regarding the meeting or for teleconference conferencing services 

should contact April BeBault at 301-415-3760.

###

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand.

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC’s website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-108 June 15, 2011
### SUBCHAPTER VI—EDUCATION AND TRAINING
##### 



Exhibit 23.1 Independent Auditors Consent The Board of Directors
XO Communications Inc.: We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-103428 and No. 333-106302) on Form S-8 of XO Communications, Inc. of our report
dated March 8, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance
sheet of XO Communications, Inc. as of December 31, 2003
(Reorganized XO) and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for the periods from January 1, 2003 to
December 31, 2003 (Reorganized XO period) and for the portion of January 1,
2003 related to the Predecessor's reorganization gain (Predecessor XO period),
and all related financial statement schedules, which report appears in the
December 31, 2003, annual report on Form 10-K of XO Communications, Inc. Our report refers to our audit of the adjustments that
were applied to adopt Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 145,
Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement
No. 13, and Technical Corrections to revise the 2001 consolidated financial
statements, as more fully described in Note 5(d) to the consolidated financial
statements. However, we were not engaged to audit, review, or apply
any procedures to the 2001 consolidated financial statements other than with respect to such adjustments. As discussed in Notes 1, 2 and 3, to the consolidated financial statements, on
January 16, 2003, XO Communications, Inc. emerged from bankruptcy. The
consolidated financial statements of Reorganized XO reflect the impact of
adjustments to reflect the fair value of assets and liabilities under fresh
start reporting, which was applied effective January 1, 2003. As a result, the
consolidated financial statements of Reorganized XO are presented on a
different basis than those of Predecessor XO and, therefore, are not comparable
in all respects. /s/ KPMG LLP Mclean, Virginia
March 11, 2004
#### § 325.1 Scope.

This part contains regulations for issuing export trade certificates of review under title III of the Export Trading Company Act, Pub. L. 97-290. A holder of a certificate of review and the members named in the certificate will have specific protections from private treble damage actions and government criminal and civil suits under U.S. Federal and State antitrust laws for the export conduct specified in the certificate and carried out during its effective period in compliance with its terms and conditions.
##### 



RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD CERTIFICATE June 12, 2003 Exhibit 10.53 Timothy J. Lorello
1524 Sappington Drive
Gambrills, MD 21054 USA Dear Timothy: Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the TeleCommunication Systems, Inc.
Amended & Restated 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (the Plan), you have been
granted a Restricted Stock Award (the Award) for the number of shares (each
an Award Share, and collectively, the Award Shares) of the Class A common
stock, par value $0.01 per share (the Common Stock) of TeleCommunication
Systems, Inc. (the Company) as outlined below. This Certificate constitutes
part of and is subject to the terms and provisions of the attached Restricted
Stock Grant Agreement (the Agreement) which is incorporated herein by
reference. Granted To: Timothy J. Lorello     
(the Employee)
Grant Date: April 14, 2003
Award Shares Granted: 55,000
Vesting Schedule: 3-year Vesting 18,333 on 04/14/2004
18,333 on 04/14/2005
18,334 on 04/14/2006 By my signature below, I hereby acknowledge receipt of this Award granted on
the Grant Date shown above, which has been issued to me under the terms and
conditions of the Agreement and the Plan. I understand that I will forfeit all
unvested Award Shares at the close of business on my last day of employment at
TCS. I further acknowledge receipt of the Plan Prospectus and the latest annual
report or other SEC filing, and agree to be bound by all of the terms and
conditions of the Award, as evidenced in the Agreement, and the Plan. Signature: /s/ Timothy J. Lorello
    
    Date: ________________Timothy J. Lorello
 Note: If there are any discrepancies in the name or address shown above, please
make the appropriate corrections on this form.
Spray Cooling forPerformance Enhancement ofAir-Cooled CondensersJ.S. MaulbetschM. N. DiFilippoK. D. ZammitEPRI Advanced Cooling WorkshopCharlotte, North CarolinaAugust 9, 2008AlternativeSolutionsHybrid wet-dry systems–Commonly used for plume abatement–Several design optionsSpray-enhanced dry cooling–Technology adaptation fromgas turbine unitsSpray-EnhancedDry CoolingIn gas turbines, inlet aircooling racks used toenhance efficiency–Pre-cooling spray nozzlesintroduce fine mistIn dry cooling systems,approach could be appliedto pre-cool inlet air–Reduce capacity loss–Water use intermittent; rate~25% full wet coolingSpray-EnhancedDry CoolingWithout pre-cooling, ambientT increase from ~55o to 90oFreduces capacity–For 235-MW unit, lose 10 to12 MW (~5%)If air pre-cooled to 70%relative humidity, capacityloss reduced–For 235-MW unit, lose only3 to 5 MWChinese CampACC at ChineseCampSprays inoperationMist entering fanSprayEnhancementSpray EnhancementTest SetupHot DayPerformanceAverage DB Temperature ProfilesCrockett Single-Cell Spray Testing606570758085909510012:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM

DB Temperature, FDeck DBFan Outlet DBB Exch DBGlycolDeck WBFan Oultlet WBMaximum CoolingEffectMaximum Cooling Effect for Cell B Airflow0246810121416180510 15 2025Wet Bulb Depression, deg F

Cooling Effect, deg F10 gpm15 gpm20 gom25 gpm5 gpmCooling EffectResultsCooling Effect vs. Wet Bulb Depression0246810121413.51414.51515.51616.5Wet Bulb Depression, deg F

Cooling Effect, deg FSpray rate = 19 gpmTDe ck DB-TFanDBvs (TDe ck DB-TDe ck WB) x S pray R ateS ingle-Cell Testing, Crock ett024681012140 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500(TDeckDB-TDeckW B)x S pra y Ra te , Fx gpm

T DeckDB -T FanDB , FData Correlation(TDe ck DB-TFanDB)/(TDe ck DB-TDe ck WB) vs S pray R ateS ingle-Cell Testing, Crock ett0.00.20.40.60.80.05.010.015.020.025.0S pra y Ra te , gpm

(T DeckDB -T FanDB )/(T DeckDB -T DeckWB )Correlation vs.Spray RateEl Dorado EnergyCenterEl Dorado ACCEffect onBackpressureTurbine Back Pressure vs Spray Rate - JulyElDorado LLC2345670 20 40 60 80 100 120Spray Rate, gpm/cell

Back Pressure, "HgAmb DB = 115 F110 F105 F100 F95 F90 FSteam Flow = 1,067,000 #/hrPower RecoveryRecovered Power vs Start Temp vs Spray Period2,4002,6002,8003,0003,2003,4003,6003,8004,000859095100105Start Temperature for Spraying, F

Recov Power, MWHr10am to 7:59pm10am-8:59pm10am-6:59pm11am-6:59pmWater Budget = 35,210,000 gallonsSpray Period - 10am-8:59pmWater Budget = 26,410,000 gallonsNow What?Showstoppers- Surface wetting- Rainback- Cost (Approx $0.5 M for 40 cell, plus $0.7 Mto 2.0M for water treatment and storage)Approaches- Nozzle choice/location- Flow modeling- Demisters
# L_2022041EN.01003601.xml

| 22.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 41/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 41/36

---

RECOMMENDATION No 1/2022 OF THE EU-PLO JOINT COMMITTEE

of 31 January 2022

approving the extension of the EU-PA Action Plan [2022/253]

THE EU-PLO JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Euro-Mediterranean Interim Association Agreement on trade and cooperation between the European Community, of the one part, and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) for the benefit of the Palestinian Authority of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, of the other part (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | The Euro-Mediterranean Interim Association Agreement on trade and cooperation between the European Community, of the one part, and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) for the benefit of the Palestinian Authority of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, of the other part (the ‘Interim Association Agreement’) was signed on 24 February 1997 and entered into force on 1 July 1997. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Euro-Mediterranean Interim Association Agreement on trade and cooperation between the European Community, of the one part, and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) for the benefit of the Palestinian Authority of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, of the other part (the ‘Interim Association Agreement’) was signed on 24 February 1997 and entered into force on 1 July 1997.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 63 of the Interim Association Agreement, the Joint Committee has the power to take decisions and make appropriate recommendations. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 63 of the Interim Association Agreement, the Joint Committee has the power to take decisions and make appropriate recommendations.

| (3) | Article 10 of the Rules of Procedure of the Joint Committee provides for the possibility of taking decisions by written procedure between sessions if both Parties so agree. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Article 10 of the Rules of Procedure of the Joint Committee provides for the possibility of taking decisions by written procedure between sessions if both Parties so agree.

| (4) | The extension of the EU-PA Action Plan for three years will give the Parties the opportunity to take forward their cooperation for the coming years, including through the possible negotiation of partnership priorities, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The extension of the EU-PA Action Plan for three years will give the Parties the opportunity to take forward their cooperation for the coming years, including through the possible negotiation of partnership priorities,

HAS ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING RECOMENDATION:

Article 1

The Joint Committee, acting by written procedure, recommends that the EU-PA Action Plan be extended for three years as of the date of the adoption of this Recommendation.

Article 2

This Recommendation shall take effect on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 31 January 2022.

For the EU-PLO Joint Committee

The Chairperson

Estephan SALAMEH

---

(1)  
  OJ L 187, 16.7.1997, p. 3.

1

---
### subpart 1—medical training generally
FEDERAL GEOGRAPHIC DATA COMMITTEE PHONE: 703-648-5514

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, 590 NATIONAL CENTER FAX: 703-648-5755

RESTON, VIRGINIA 20192 HTTP://WWW .FGDC.GOV E-MAIL: GDC@USGS.GOV

April 1999

NSDI Community/Federal Information Partnership

The Nation's communities are calling for greater governments, the academic community, and the

assistance in dealing with issues that affect their private and non-profit sectors. The initiative will

economic, social, and environmental well being. have two integrated components:

Many of the problems transcend local

jurisdictional boundaries and are best addressed Ç A competitive matching grant program to

by place-based approaches that require consensus help promote the widespread availability

among many stakeholder groups. Communities and use of geographic data for community

are looking for leadership, information, and problem solving. This component will

support from the Federal Government. In many increase the capacity of communities to

cases ready access to coordinated geographic data create and use geographic data in decision

from all levels of government and private industry making.

is essential for communities to identify key issues Ç Support for Federal agencies to make their

and take necessary actions. geographic data more readily available to

The National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI) ensure the full and rapid implementation of

is the linkage of technology, policies, standards, the NSDI in a cost-effective and

and resources that are necessary to improve the cooperative manner.

way geospatial data is acquired, stored,

processed, disseminated, and used. The NSDI is The aim of the partnership is to build on the

being developed by many organizations comprehensive, integrated, nationwide National

throughout the country in response to a Spatial Data Infrastructure and improve

recommendation in the Vice President’s National accessability to all Americans.

Performance Review. The Federal Geographic

Data Committee (FGDC) has provided guidance

for this effort and considerable progress has been

made but much work remains.

The Community/Federal Information Partnership

(C/FIP) is being developed by the 17 federal

agencies that make up the FGDC in cooperation

with organizations from State, local, and Tribal 

communities. This component will help

America’s communities need

spatially referenced earth and

biological science data to make

informed decisions about their

futures . . . information partnerships

with federal agencies provide the

essential data they need.
----

**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form10-Q of Colombia Goldfields Ltd. for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, Icertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that: 
(1) 

the quarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of Colombia Goldfields Ltd. for the quarter ended March 31,2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
(2) 

the informationcontained in the quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,2008, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Colombia Goldfields Ltd.. 

By:        */s/ J. Randall Martin                                              *Name:    J. Randall Martin Title:      Chief Executive Officer and Vice ChairmanDate:      May 9, 2008
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6325

CLAYTON WESLEY CARLETON, Petitioner - Appellant,

versus WILLIE EAGLETON, Warden of Evans Correctional Institution; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; HENRY MCMASTER, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-02-909-4-23) Submitted: June 12, 2003 Decided: June 17, 2003 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clayton Wesley Carleton, Appellant Pro Se. Derrick K. McFarland, Samuel Creighton Waters, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIUM: Clayton Wesley Carleton seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken to this court from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). When a district court dismisses a habeas petition solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of a denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Carleton has not satisfied this standard. SeeMitchell-El v. Cockrell , 123 S. Ct. 1029 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We deny Carleton’s motion for transfer of custody. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process. DISMISSED