alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 224 (Monday, November 22, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 67963]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25768]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 958(i), the Attorney General shall, prior to 
issuing a registration under this Section to a bulk manufacturer of a 
controlled substance in Schedule I or II and prior to issuing a 
registration under 21 U.S.C. 952(a)(2)(B) authorizing the importation 
of such a substance, provide manufacturers holding registrations for 
the bulk manufacture of the substance an opportunity for a hearing.
    Therefore, in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34(a), this is notice 
that on August 20, 2004, ISP Freetown Fine Chemicals, 238 South Main 
Street, Assonet, Massachusetts 02702, made application by renewal to 
the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for registration as an 
importer of Phenylacetone (8501), a basic class of controlled substance 
listed in Schedule II.
    The company plans to import Phenylacetone to manufacture 
amphetamine.
    Any manufacturer who is presently, or is applying to be, registered 
with DEA to manufacture such basic class of controlled substance may 
file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed 
registration and may, at the same time, file a written request for a 
hearing on such application pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.43 and in such form 
as prescribed by 21 CFR 1316.47.
    Any such comments or objections or requests for hearing may be 
addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, 
Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, United 
States Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA 
Federal Register Representative, Office of Liaison and Policy (ODLR) 
and must be filed no later than December 22, 2004.
    This procedure is to be conducted simultaneously with, and 
independent, of the procedures described in 21 CFR 1301.34(b), (c), 
(d), (e) and (f). As noted in a previous notice published in the 
Federal Register on September 23, 1975, (40 FR 43745-46), all 
applicants for registration to import a basic class of any controlled 
substances in Schedule I or II are and will continue to be required to 
demonstrate to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion 
Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, that the requirements for 
such registration pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 958(a), 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and 
21 CFR 1301.34(b), (c), (d), (e) and (f) are satisfied.

    Dated: November 8, 2004.
William J. Walker,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 04-25768 Filed 11-19-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
BATH & HAMMONDSPORT RAILROAD

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

This is the decision of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning

the continued status of the Bath & Hammondsport Railroad Company

(BHRC) as an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act (RRA) and

the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (RUIA). BHRC was ruled to

be an employer under the Acts administered by the Board effective

January 17, 1872.

On February 25, 1993, BHRC sold substantially all of its rail line,

equipment, and operating rights to the Steuben County Industrial

Development Agency (Stueben) . BHRC operated the rail line for

Stueben until March 17, 1993 . After this date one employee

remained on the payroll to perform accounting and freight work

necessary to wind down BHRC operations. That employee was last

compensated on April 27, 1994.

Based on the information summarized above, it is the Board's

determination that the Bath & Hammondsport Railroad Company ceased

being an employer under the RRA and RUIA on April 27, 1994.

Glen L. Bower

BCD 1995-64 BA # 3201
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-4247

_____________________________

ROBERT B. TALBOT,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Wakulla County.

James O. Shelfer, Judge.

September 11, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, B.L. THOMAS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Robert B. Talbot, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos.333-136072, 333-118610, 333-107466, 333-66676, 333-51656, and 333-48026) pertaining to variousstock incentive and option plans and in Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-133018,333-119431, 333-112759, and 333-104305) pertaining to various stock offerings of TeleCommunicationSystems, Inc. of our reports dated March 8, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements and schedule of Telecommunication Systems, Inc., TeleCommunication Systems, Inc.management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting ofTelecommunication Systems, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of TeleCommunicationSystems, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006.   Baltimore, Maryland /s/ Ernst & Young LLPMarch 8, 2007
----

----

**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

| 1. | The                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section                13(a) or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in                all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company at the end of the periods covered by the Quarterly Report. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                May 18, 2007 |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|-----------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                              | By:    |  /s/                *James                Price                                  * |
|                              |   | James                Price                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|                              |   | Chief                Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT IN THE INTEREST OF: Z.A.B., A MINOR

PETITION OF: E.B., MOTHER : : : : : : : No. 608 EAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 22nd day of January, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 01-1534

___________ Michael Jacobson, * * Petitioner, * * Petition for Review of v. * an Order of the United States * Department of Agriculture. Ann Veneman, Secretary, United * States Department of Agriculture, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Respondent. *

___________ Submitted: August 30, 2001 Filed: September 4, 2001

___________ Before HANSEN, FAGG, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Michael Jacobson petitions this court for review of the United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA’s) decision not to hold a referendum on its beef checkoff program. Because we lack jurisdiction to review the USDA’s decision, we dismiss the petition without prejudice. Absent a statutory provision conferring jurisdiction upon the courts of appeals, the district courts have exclusive jurisdiction to review those agency decisions subject to judicial review. See Jaunich v. United States Commodity Futures Trading Comm’n ,-2-

50 F.3d 518, 520 (8th Cir. 1995); Nolandv. United States Civil Serv. Comm’n , 544 F.2d 333, 334 (8th Cir. 1976) (per curiam). The Beef Promotion and Research Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 2901-2911, which governs the beef checkoff program, does not include such a grant of jurisdiction. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition without prejudice. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
MEA LLili 

Michigan Education Association ' SPOR iATlOi i ^^^^ ^'^"'^^''^ ^^^"^^ 

" "•• '. • :'"|0!^PAT^ " •' ? East Lansing, MI 48823 

517-332-6551 

;"!: F--n v n P I: liM 800-292-1934 

February 20, 2012 

Docket Management Facility 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 

Washington, DC 20590 

Ref: Sun Country Slot Exemption - Docket Number FAA-2012-0089 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

Sun Country Airlines has requested an exemption from the slot limit at Ronald Reagan 

Washington National Airport (DCA) set for the in § 93.123(a), to permit FAA to create 

air carrier slots during certain limited hours for Sun Country's use. The proposed air 

carrier slots would replace two slot exemptions under DOT Order 2010-12-16 awarded to 

Sun Country. On January 6, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of 

Columbia Circuit vacated the DOT Order, and Sun Country will lose its existing service 

between DCA and the Lansing's Capital Region International Airport. Specifically, Sun 

Country desires one daily slot during each of the 1000 and 1100 hours. The proposed 

exemption would permit Sun County to continue operating its existing services and avoid 

an inequitable result of the Court's order. 

The Michigan Education Association (MEA) is located in Lansing. Many of our officers 

and managers fly to Washington D.C. on a regular basis. The MEA has a strong 

affiliation to the Lansing area and want to continue to contribute to the economic growth 

of the city. With the continuing service from the Lansing's Capital Region International 

Airport our organization can do just that. Our organization has more than 100,000 

members and some of them do fly from Lansing and perhaps more would be enticed to 

do the same if the flight schedule allows. Without the exemption. Sun Country will be 

forced to terminate service between LAN and DCA. Lansing will no longer have direct 

air access to DCA, and those passengers who use Sun Country connection service 

through LAN will lose that option as well. 

- www.inea.arg Affiliated witti the National Education Association 
February 20, 2012 

Page Two 

The Sun Country DCA service is essential to the economic growth of the Greater Lansing 

Region. The daily service is the only large aircraft (737-800) service to Washington 

Reagan Airport, in the state of Michigan outside of Detroit. Prior to Sun Country, the 

regional community had requested the introduction of this service from numerous other 

airline operators without success. Accordingly, it is critical that the FAA take the 

necessary steps to ensure the continuation of the Sun Country slots at the established 

flight times in the support of Greater Lansing's business and economic growth. 

Your immediate approval of this exemption, so that Sun Country can begin to enter flight 

schedules for sale for the balance of 2012, will be greatly appreciated. 

Smcerely, 

Nancy Sfrachan, Vice President 

Michigan Education Association
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains editorial corrections of previously published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule, and Notice documents. These corrections are prepared by the Office of the Federal Register. Agency prepared corrections are issued as signed documents and appear in the appropriate document categories elsewhere in the issue. 

# Corrections Federal Register 

### 13074

Vol. 70, No. 51
Thursday, March 17, 2005

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 39**
**[Docket No. FAA–2004–19530; Directorate Identifier 2002–NM–274–AD; Amendment**  **39–14008; AD 2005–05–19]**

**RIN 2120–AA64**
**Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 727 Airplanes** 

Correction

In rule document 05–4826 beginning on page 12120 in the issue of Friday, March 11, 2005, make the following corrections:
**§ 39.13 [Corrected]**

1. On page 12122 in § 39.13(h), in the table, in the fifth column, in the first entry, in the fourth line, ‘‘of the upper chord the’’ should read ‘‘of the upper chord of the’’.

2. On the same page, in the same section, in the same table, in the same column, in the second entry, in the third line, ‘‘chord’’ should read ‘‘chords’’.

3. On the same page, in the same section, in the same table, in the same column, in the third entry, in the third line, ‘‘of the rear spar from’’ should read ‘‘of the front spar and the lower chord of the rear spar from ’’.

4. On the same page, in the same section, in the same table, in the same column, in the fourth entry, in the third line, ‘‘rear spar WBL’’ should read ‘‘rear spar from WBL’’.

5. On page 12123, in the same section, in the same table, in the same column, the first entry is corrected to read as follows: An HFEC inspection of the upper chord of the rear spar from WBL 70.5 to the wing tip for cracks, corrosion, minor surface defects, and existing stop-drilled repairs of cracking (initial inspection only), in accordance with paragraph 3.B., Work Instructions, Part 9, of the Accomplishment Instructions of the service bulletin.
[FR Doc. C5–4826 Filed 3–16–05; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 1505–01–D**
EXHIBIT 11

STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

                                                       Years Ended December 31,
                                                       ------------------------
                                                       2005             2004
                                                       ----             ----

Weighted average shares of common stock
  outstanding during the year                         3,440,254       3,421,254

Shares of common stock issuable in connection
  with assumed exercise of options under the
  treasury stock method                                  73,305          40,907
                                                   ------------     -----------

Total                                                 3,513,559       3,462,161
                                                   ============     ===========

Net income                                         $  2,409,553     $ 1,647,558
                                                   ============     ===========

Per share amount - basic                           $      0.70      $      0.48

Per share amount - diluted                         $      0.69      $      0.48
### **CHAPTER 28—STRATEGIC PLANNING AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT**

Sec.
2801.
Definitions.
2802.
Strategic plans.
2803.
Performance plans.
2804.
Program performance reports.
2805.
Inherently Governmental functions.
No. II-13-027 April 23, 2013

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416

NRC SCHEDULES OPEN HOUSE TO DISCUSS 

CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled an open house for May 1 to 

discuss the agency’s assessment of safety performance during 2012 for the Crystal River nuclear 

power plant. The plant, operated by Duke Energy, is near Crystal River, Fla., about 80 miles 

north of Tampa.

The open house is scheduled to run from 10:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. in Room 150 of the 

Crystal River plant training center at 8200 Venable St. in Crystal River. There will be posters 

explaining the NRC’s role, and the NRC staff will be available to answer questions about the

Crystal River plant as well as overall NRC oversight and inspection. 

In February, Duke Energy announced that it would retire Crystal River’s single nuclear 

unit, which has been shut down since 2009. Although the purpose of the May 1 meeting is not to 

specifically discuss the process for decommissioning the Crystal River plant, NRC staff 

members with expertise in that area will be there to answer any questions. In addition, the NRC 

will no longer staff the resident inspector office at the plant and will perform inspections with

inspectors from the NRC regional office in Atlanta or other NRC offices.

Overall, the NRC staff concluded that the Crystal River plant was maintained in a safe 

manner in 2012, but the plant was subject to increased oversight due to an emergency 

preparedness issue during the first two quarters of the year. An NRC inspection found that the 

issue was addressed and the plant was under normal oversight for the second half of 2012.

The NRC staff is currently developing an inspection plan consistent with 

decommissioning at the plant.

“The NRC inspects nuclear plants and monitors their performance on an ongoing basis,” 

said NRC Region II Administrator Victor McCree. “We will continue to inspect and monitor the 

activities at the Crystal River site as Duke Energy works through the decommissioning process. 

We will have further meetings to discuss that process and although we will be closing the 

resident inspector office, we welcome any comments or questions nearby residents may have.”

The annual assessment letter for Crystal River is available on the NRC website. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave. NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
Further information about decommissioning can also be found on the NRC website.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3383 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3383

    To require railroad carriers to prepare and maintain a plan for 
  notifying local emergency responders before transporting hazardous 
                 materials through their jurisdictions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 4, 2011

 Mr. Gonzalez (for himself, Ms. Norton, and Mr. Rangel) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To require railroad carriers to prepare and maintain a plan for 
  notifying local emergency responders before transporting hazardous 
                 materials through their jurisdictions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safe Transportation of Hazardous 
Materials Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT.

    Every railroad carrier engaged in the transportation of hazardous 
materials shall transmit to the Secretary of Transportation, and 
annually update, a plan for providing at least 48 hours notification to 
local emergency responders before transporting hazardous materials 
through their jurisdictions within 48 hours of a request for such 
information from those local emergency responders. This plan may 
include notification by means of county or State government agencies.

SEC. 3. DEMONSTRATION.

    The Secretary of Transportation shall establish a requirement that 
railroad carriers periodically demonstrate to the Secretary that the 
procedures set forth in the plan transmitted under section 2 are 
adequate to provide appropriate notice to those local emergency 
responders if they request this information as described in section 2.

SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS.

    For purposes of this Act--
            (1) the term ``hazardous materials'' means materials 
        designated under section 5103(a) of title 49, United States 
        Code; and
            (2) the term ``emergency responder'' means State and local 
        emergency preparedness personnel described in section 613(a) of 
        the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance 
        Act (42 U.S.C. 5196b(a)).
                                 <all>
```
### StormKlear EPA Case Study

Project: RC Edwards Middle School

Central, SC

Owner: Pickens County School District, SC

Contractor: Raby Construction, Greenville, SC

Product: StormKlear DPS Segmented Socks

Dose Rate: 2.5 mg/L

Description: Approximately 35,000 square feet of additions and 80,000 square feet of renovations were

made to the existing RC Edwards Middle School located in Central, SC adjacent to Hartwell Lake off of

Highway 123 near Clemson University. Because of the clay soils and volume of rain, turbid water could

potentially bypass the standard BMP’s installed. As a result, a StormKlear DPS dewatering system using

Segmented Geosynthetic Socks was deployed. The Socks were installed in a 6” dual chambered schedule

40 PVC manifold. The DBP

‐ 2100 Sock was installed in the first chamber, and the GelFloc Sock in the

second; the discharge hose was then routed to a 15’ x 10’ TerraTex N08 filterbag.

Results – Influent: 687 NTU, Filterbag Discharge: 32 NTU

Residual Biopolymer Test: Negative
### Part B—Hybrid Vehicles, Advanced Vehicles, and Fuel Cell Buses