alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

APPOINTMENT TO THE CIVIL

PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE

. :

:

:

: No. 696

CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 17 th day of April, 2019, Terrence R. Nealon, Jr., Esquire,

Lackawanna County, is hereby appointed as a member of the Civil Procedural Rules

Committee for a term of three years, commencing Ju ne 30 , 2019.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lamel Smith, Appellant.

[820 NYS2d 822]

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Mathews, J.), rendered April 13, 2004, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of manslaughter in the first degree.

Defendant was charged by indictment with murder in the second degree and manslaughter in the first degree for his role in a fatal shooting. Pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement, defendant pleaded guilty to manslaughter in the first degree in exchange for a sentence of 10 years in prison. Defendant was then sentenced in accordance with the plea agreement, and he now appeals.

We are unpersuaded by defendant’s sole contention that his sentence is harsh and excessive. Notwithstanding, among other things, defendant’s youth and his lack of a significant criminal record, there is no indication that County Court abused its discretion in imposing the sentence for this violent offense, nor are there any extraordinary circumstances that would warrant a modification thereof. Inasmuch as defendant agreed to the sentence under the negotiated plea bargain agreement, we find no reason to reduce the sentence imposed *(see People v Miller,*
      *108329 AD3d 1033, 1033 [2006]; *People v McCarthy,*23 AD3d 919, 919-920 [2005]).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Issue Date: 04/24/13 1 13-012 

 NRC INSPECTION MANUAL DIRS 

Change Notice 13-012

 DELETED: TRANSMITTED: 

 Number Date Number Date

1. IMC 0102 08/22/05 IMC 0102 04/24/13 

2. IP 71111.04 10/28/11 IP 71111.04 04/24/13 

3. IP 82301 12/22/08 IP 82301 04/24/13 

4. IP 82302 12/22/08 IP 82302 04/24/13 

5. IP 82701 12/22/08 IP 82701 04/24/13 

TRAINING: No. 

REMARKS: IMC 0102, “Oversight and Objectivity of Inspectors and Examiners at Reactor 

Facilities,” has been revised to reflect current expectations on line management 

observation of NRC inspectors and improved routing of site visit observation 

forms. Also closed the following feedback forms: 0102-1237, -1384, -1598, -

1617, -1618, and -1648. 

IP 71111.04, “Equipment Alignment,” has been revised to allow the flexibility to 

perform one of the two complete system walkdowns outside of the mitigating 

systems cornerstone. 

IP 82301, “Evaluation of Exercises for Power Plants,” has been re-activated for 

the decommissioning of Crystal River 3 and Kewaunee. 

IP 82302, “Review of Exercise Objectives and Scenarios for Power Reactors,” 

has been re-activated for the decommissioning of Crystal River 3 and Kewaunee. 

IP 82701, “Operational Status of the Emergency Preparedness Program,” has 

been re-activated for the decommissioning of Crystal River 3 and Kewaunee. 

DISTRIBUTION: Standard 

END
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Gregory Bruno, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
---

Section 1350 Certifications

CERTIFICATE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

I, Jerry Dibble, a Director and President, who also
performs the function of Principal Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of Capital Mineral Investors, Inc. (the
Corporation), certify that the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report")
for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof:

|1. | fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and                                       
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                    
|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Corporation.

|(Signature) | /s/ Jerry
      Dibble                                                                           | 
|----------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|            | Jerry Dibble                                                                                       | 
|(Title)     | President and Director (also performs the function
      of Principal Executive Officer, Principal
|            | Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)                                               
|            |                                                                                                    | 
|(Date)      | August 19, 2008                                                                                    | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Corporation and will be retained by the Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-10-0099 - Proposed Revision to Memorandum of Understanding Between the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Accession Number: ML102080044

Date Released: Friday, August 20, 2010

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML100150065 - SECY-10-0099 - Proposed Revision to Memorandum of Understanding Between the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (4 page(s), 7/30/2010)
    - ML091530139 - Charter: Joint FEMA/NRC Steering Committee on Emergency Preparedness. (5 page(s), 7/6/2009)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jefferson Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  |                                      
|---------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|November 9, 2006 |  | /s/ Anderson L. Smith                
|                 |  | Anderson L. Smith                    
|                 |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



|                 |  |                                                 
|---------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|November 9, 2006 |  | /s/ Jane P. Hutton                              
|                 |  | Jane P. Hutton                                  
|                 |  | Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
§ 1021.12 Environmental assessment. ( a ) An environmental assessment shall first briefly describe the proposed action and realistic alternative actions. Next, it shall identify all effects on the environment that can be expected to result from the proposed and alternative actions. After each anticipated effect is identified, it shall be described as fully as can be done with available data in order to show its magnitude and significance. Sources of information for assessment include CPSC staff studies and research reports, information gathered at hearings or meetings held to obtain the views of the public on the proposed action, and other information received from members of the public and from governmental entities.
( b ) The assessment shall identify and describe any methods or approaches which would avoid or minimize adverse effects on the environment.
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 24, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 68440]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26054]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 34604]

Rio Valley Railroad, Inc.--Acquisition Exemption--Rail Lines of 
Union Pacific Railroad Company in Cameron County, TX

    Rio Valley Railroad, Inc. (RVRI), a Class III rail carrier, has 
filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.41 to acquire by 
lease approximately 17.38 miles of rail lines located in Cameron 
County, TX, from the Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP). RVRI will 
lease the following rail lines: (1) A portion of the Mission Industrial 
Lead from milepost 0.06, at a point 50 feet measured at a right angle 
from UP's Brownsville Subdivision main track No. 104 at Harlingen, TX, 
to milepost 1.00 in Harlingen Yard at Harlingen, TX; (2) the Santa Rosa 
Industrial Lead from milepost 0.00 in Harlingen Yard at Harlingen, TX, 
to milepost 11.38 near Rogers Lacy, TX; and (3) approximately 5 miles 
of track in Harlingen Yard at Harlingen, TX.
    This transaction is related to STB Finance Docket No. 34605, Rio 
Valley Switching Company--Operation Exemption--Rio Valley Railroad, 
Inc., wherein Rio Valley Switching Company seeks to operate the lines 
being leased by RVRI.
    RVRI certifies that its projected revenues as a result of this 
transaction will not result in the creation of a Class II or Class I 
rail carrier. The transaction was scheduled to be consummated no sooner 
than November 2, 2004, the effective date of the exemption (7 days 
after the exemption was filed).
    If the notice contains false or misleading information, the 
exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 
U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to 
revoke will not automatically stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 34604, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, 1925 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, one 
copy of each pleading must be served on Thomas F. McFarland, Thomas F. 
McFarland, P.C., 208 South LaSalle Street, 1890, Chicago, IL 
60604-1112.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at 
``www.stb.dot.gov.''

    Decided: November 17, 2004.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04-26054 Filed 11-23-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 17, 2018

No. 04

- 17

- 00366

- CR & 04

- 17

- 00367

- CR

Roger Trudell DAVIS

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judi cial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR3461 & 2015CR6145

Honorable Steve Hilbig, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file the motion for rehearing is granted. The

motion for rehearing is denied.

_____________________________ ____ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 17th day of September, 2018

.

_____________________ ______________ K eith E. H ottle

Clerk of Court
No: II-13-044 June 19, 2013

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416

NRC Proposes $70,000 Fine for Violations at Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Unit 2 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has proposed a $70,000 civil penalty against the 

Tennessee Valley Authority for violations related to the commercial grade dedication program during 

the construction of Watts Bar nuclear plant Unit 2. The Watts Bar plant, where one unit has been in 

operation since 1996, is located near Spring City, Tenn., about 60 miles southwest of Knoxville.

The NRC requires certain components in a nuclear plant to meet strict nuclear quality 

assurance standards. Commercial grade dedication is a process that provides reasonable assurance that 

components purchased from a commercial supplier are equivalent to nuclear grade items. This 

assurance is achieved through documented inspections, tests or analyses. 

An NRC inspection conducted in late 2012 and early this year identified three violations 

related to the Watts Bar Unit 2 commercial grade dedication program. NRC inspectors found a 

breakdown in the program resulting in construction of unknown quality, a failure to report that 

breakdown and a failure to identify that issue as a significant condition affecting quality. 

“While TVA has aggressively addressed these issues, the violations and proposed civil 

penalty emphasize the importance of an effective quality assurance program during construction as well 

as prompt identification and reporting of any related breakdowns,” said NRC Region II Deputy 

Administrator for Construction Fred Brown.

At a conference in early May, TVA outlined a number of corrective actions including a 

review of all commercial grade dedication documents, additional staff training and creating a new 

position to oversee the process. The NRC also noted that TVA continues to test items that have already 

been purchased or installed. 

TVA has 30 days to respond to the violations and either pay the civil penalty or protest 

its imposition.

A copy of the letter sent to TVA is available on the NRC website.
(May 31, 1949.)

#### Ira M. Belfer, Respondent, *v.*Dictograph Products, Inc., Appellant.

*Per Curiam.*

The Special Term’s ruling that plaintiff’s claims are established by what amounts to a *“*fatal refusal to respond to the notice to admit ” (Civ. Prac. Act, § 322) was erroneous. Where a party has elected to decline to admit or to deny certain items tendered in a notice served pursuant to the foregoing section for reasons given, the only penalty to be imposed by the court if it finds such refusal was unreasonable is the assessment of reasonable expenses incurred in the making of the proof by the other party (Civ. Prac. Act, § 322, subd. 3; *Langan*v. *First Trust & Deposit Co.,*270 App. Div. 700, affd. 296 N. Y. 1014; *Rusnak*v. *Doby,*267 App. Div. 122). The question as to whether a party has rightly or wrongly declined for reasons set forth to admit or to deny an item tendered in a notice to admit is for the trial court and not for the Special Term to decide *(Langan*V. *First Trust & Deposit Co., supra,*p. 706).

There was no warrant for granting plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment as to the “ First ”, *“*Second ”, “ Third ” and “ Fifth ” causes of action contained in the amended complaint. The oral agreements alleged by plaintiff as the basis for these causes of action are unequivocally denied in the answer and in the affidavits submitted by defendant. This raised -an issue that could only be resolved by a trial.

Defendant’s motion for summary judgment grounded upon the affirmative defense contained in the answer was properly denied.

The order should be reversed to the extent of denying plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant.

Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Yan Voorhis and Shientag, JJ., concur.

Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, to the extent of denying plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment. [See *post,*p. 923.]
**Exhibit32**

****

**THE CLOROXCOMPANY**

CERTIFICATION

In connection with theperiodic report of The Clorox Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Kfor the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the "Report"), we, Gerald E. Johnston, ChiefExecutive Officer and Karen M. Rose, Chief FinancialOfficer****of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof,solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of theUnited States Code, that to the best of our knowledge:

the Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, and

the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company at the dates and for theperiods indicated. 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

This Certification has notbeen, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with theSecurities and Exchange Commission.

Dated this 19th day ofSeptember, 2003.

/s/ Gerald E.Johnston  

Gerald E.Johnston

President and ChiefExecutive Officer

/s/ KarenRose

Karen Rose

Group Vice President– Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2533 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 2533

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 24, 2003

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 10701 Abercorn Street in Savannah, Georgia, as the ``J.C. Lewis, Jr. 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 10701 
Abercorn Street in Savannah, Georgia, shall be known and designated as 
the ``J.C. Lewis, Jr. Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``J.C. Lewis, Jr. Post Office 
Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 23, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Norman Simmons, Respondent.

Present—Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Harris and McCurn, JJ.
#### Isaak Goldberg, etc., Respondent, v. Georgia Building Company and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with Vernewl Realty and Construction Corporation, Appellant.

Judgment and order of the County Court of Kings county affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-53,781] 

Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on December 11, 2003 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Bes-Tex Fabrics, Inc., New York, New York. 

The investigation revealed that the subject firm did not separate or threaten to separate a significant number or proportion of workers as required by section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974. Significant number or proportion of the workers means that at least three workers in a firm with a workforce of fewer than 50 workers would have to be affected. Separations by the subject firm did not meet this threshold level; consequently the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC this 12th day of January 2004. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 04-2601 Filed 2-5-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
### §8106. Regulations

Government-wide regulations governing actions under this chapter shall be issued pursuant to division B of subtitle I of this title.

(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3830.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8106 | 41:705. | Pub. L. 100–690, title V, §5156, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4308. |

Section

The words "Not later than 90 days after November 18, 1988, the" are omitted as obsolete.
§ 1000.6 Commission decisions and records. ( a ) Each decision of the Commission, acting in an official capacity as a collegial body, is recorded in Minutes of Commission meetings or as a separate Record of Commission Action. Copies of Minutes or of a Record of Commission Action may be obtained by e-mail (*cpsc-os@cpsc.gov*) or written request to the Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland 20814, or may be examined at Commission headquarters. Requests should identify the subject matter of the Commission action and the approximate date of the Commission action, if known.
( b ) Other records in the custody of the Commission may be requested by e-mail (*cpsc-os@cpsc.gov*) or in writing from the Office of the Secretary pursuant to the Commission's Procedures for Disclosure or Production of Information under the Freedom of Information Act (16 CFR part 1015).
### Part B—General Activities