alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Stefan Tyrakowski, Appellant, v. Hans A. Connell, Appellee.

Gen. No. 21,185.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. M. L. McKinley, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the March term, 1915.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed January 17, 1916.

Statement of the Case.

Action by Stefan Tyrakowski, plaintiff, against Hans A. Connell, defendant, in the Superior Court of Cook county, to recover for personal injuries sustained as a result of the alleged negligence of defendant in operating his automobile, so that plaintiff was struck by it while crossing a street. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

It appeared that the defendant was driving in the right-hand street car track in Milwaukee avenue. Plaintiff started to cross diagonally between two street intersections. The distance between the right-hand rail of the right-hand track and the curb was ten feet five inches. Plaintiff testified that he looked both ways and did not see the car, or know that one was on the street until struck. Defendant testified that he saw plaintiff when he stepped from the curb; being then fifty feet away and going at the rate of ten miles an hour; that the horn of his car was sounded five or six times, but as plaintiff paid no attention he applied the brakes and locked his rear wheels, but the track was wet and the car slid and struck plaintiff. The action was tried by jury and there was a verdict of not guilty.

Thomas E. Swanson and Elwyn E. Long, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

*472Abstract of the Decision.

1. Witnesses, § *279*—when paper signed by party not admissible for purpose of impeachment of witness.*In an action to recover for personal injuries sustained by being struck by defendant’s automobile, alleged to have been negligently operated, it is not error to exclude a paper -written in court by defendant at plaintiff's request as evidence tending to impeach defendant’s testimony that he did not write a certain other paper in evidence.

2. Evidence, § *450*—when genuineness of handwriting may not be determined by comparison with other writing.*The genuineness of handwriting cannot be proved or disputed by comparison with other writing proved or admitted to be genuine unless the writing with which it is sought to be compared is properly in evidence and pertinent to the ease.

3. Instructions, § *151*—when requested instruction properly refused.*A requested instruction is properly refused where the jury are fully instructed as to the law of the case.

Mr. Justice Baker

delivered the opinion of the court.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Page 12 of 25
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(d)


                        KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 1999-B

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE


Bank One, National Association              Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas
One Bank One Plaza, Suite 0126              fka, Bankers Trust Company
Chicago, IL 60670                           280 Park Avenue 9th Floor
Attn: Corporate Trust Administration        New York, NY 10017
Phone: (312) 407-0192                       Attn: Corporate Trust & Agency Group
Fax: (312) 407-1708                         Structured Finance
                                            Phone: (212) 454-4298
                                            Fax: (212) 454-2331

Key Bank USA, National Association
800 Superior Ave, 4th Floor
Cleveland, OH 44114
ATTN: Senior Vice President
Key Education Resources
Phone: (216) 828-9342
Fax: (216) 828-9301


Pursuant to Section 4.09 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement among Key Bank USA,
National Association, as Seller, Master Servicer and Administrator, KeyCorp
Student Loan Trust 1999-B, and Bank One, National Association as Eligible Lender
Trustee, dated as of September 1, 1999 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned hereby
certifies that (i) a review of the activities of the Administrator from January
1, 2002, through December 31, 2002, and of its performance under the Agreement
has been made, and (ii) to the best of our knowledge, based on our review, the
Administrator has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement and the
related Administration Agreement respectively throughout such period.


                                           Key Bank USA, National Association,
                                           as Administrator


                                           By: /s/ DARLENE H. DIMITRIJEVS
                                               ---------------------------------
Date: March 14, 2003                           Name: Darlene H. Dimitrijevs, CPA
                                               Title: Senior Vice President


                                           By: /s/ DEBRA S. FRONIUS
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Name: Debra S. Fronius
                                               Title: Vice President
#### § 273.6 Reporting requirement.

Each Federal agency shall, as part of its annual budget submission each fiscal year, report to the Congress on the metric implementation actions it has taken during the previous fiscal year. The report will include the agency's implementation plans, with a current timetable for the agency's transition to the metric system, as well as actions planned for the budget year involved to implement fully the metric system, in accordance with this policy. Reporting shall cease for an agency in the fiscal year after it has fully implemented metric usage, as prescribed by the Metric Conversion Act (15 U.S.C. 205b(2).)
#### § 1.24 Rules applicable to wool, fur, and textile fiber products and rules promulgated under the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act.

Rules having the force and effect of law are authorized under section 6 of the Wool Products Labeling Act of 1939, section 8 of the Fur Products Labeling Act, section 7 of the Textile Fiber Products Identification Act, and sections 4, 5, and 6 of the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act.

[40 FR 15233, Apr. 4, 1975]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 17, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 67368]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25458]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


NSB Programs and Plans Committee; Notice of Meeting

Agency Holding Meeting:  National Science Foundation, National Science 
Board, Committee on Programs and Plans.

Date and Time:  November 19, 2004 2 p.m.-2:45 p.m. Open Session 
Teleconference.

Place:  The National Science Foundation, Stafford One Building, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Room 220, Arlington, VA 22230.

Status:  This meeting will be open to the public.

Matters to be Considered: 

Friday, November 19, 2004

Open Session (2 to 2:45 p.m.)

    1. Approval on behalf of the NSB [as delegated] NSF management's 
response to the OIG Semiannual Report to Congress.
    2. Report on A&O recommended Board responses to IPA-related 
questions from staff of House Appropriations Subcommittee for VA, HUD 
and Independent agencies.
    3. Report on draft Board position statements on issues in NAPA 
recommendations.

For Further Information Contact:  Dr. Michael P. Crosby, Executive 
Officer and NSB Office Director, (703) 292-7000, http://www.nsf.gov/nsb.

Michael P. Crosby,
Executive Officer and NSB Office Director.
[FR Doc. 04-25458 Filed 11-16-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 94-41085 Summary Calendar

__________________ MACIEJ RYBICKI, BOGNA RYBICKI, KATARZYNA RYBICKI, AGATA RYBICKI, Petitioners,
versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals A28-990-182/183/184/185
- - - - - - - - - - December 20, 1995 Before KING, SMITH, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Rybickis petitioned this court to review the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing an appeal of the Immigration Judge's decision denying their applications for asylum and withholding of deportation. They argue that there was not substantial evidence to support the BIA's conclusion thatNo. 94-41085 -2- reasonable persons in their circumstances would not fear persecution in Poland and that there was little likelihood of present or future persecution that would warrant asylum or withholding of deportation. We have reviewed the record and the BIA's decision and find that the evidence does not compel reversal of the BIA's determination. Chun v. INS , 40 F.3d 76, 78 (5th Cir. 1994). PETITION DENIED.
NRC TO INCREASE OVERSIGHT OF CATAWBA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Catawba nuclear power plant faces increased oversight from the U. S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission due to violations linked to an event in April where the plant temporarily

lost offsite power. 

The Catawba plant, which is operated by Duke Energy, is located near York, S.C., about 

18 miles south of Charlotte, N.C.

The two violations involved an incorrect modification to a Unit 1 generator protective 

relay that resulted in the loss of offsite power event. After a Regulatory Conference, the NRC 

determined that the violation for Unit 1 was appropriately characterized as “white,” meaning it 

has low to moderate safety significance. The violation for Unit 2 was found to be “green,” or

very low safety significance.

The NRC staff held the Regulatory Conference at Duke Energy’s request on Sept. 11 to 

discuss the risk significance of the inspection findings with the company. After reviewing the

information from the inspection and the supplemental information provided by Duke during the 

conference, the staff reached its final safety significance conclusions.

The NRC evaluates regulatory performance at commercial nuclear power plants with a 

color-coded system which classifies findings as green, white, yellow or red in increasing order of 

safety significance. 

The “white” finding puts Unit 1 into the Regulatory Response Column on the NRC 

Action Matrix, meaning the unit will be subject to additional NRC inspections beyond the 

baseline inspections that are conducted at all nuclear plants. Unit 2 remains in the Licensee 

Response Column, meaning it is subjected to normal baseline inspections.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No: II-12-060

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416 

 October 12, 2012

E-mail: OPA2.Resource@nrc.gov
---

|CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER     
|---------------------------------------------
|PURSUANT TO                                  
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Rainer Rotthaeuser, the Chief Executive Officer of
Exploration Drilling International Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for
      the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007, and to which this
      certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                              

| | By:    | /s/ Rainer Rotthaeuser               
| | ------ | -------------------------------------
| |        |                                      
| | Name:  | RAINER ROTTHAEUSER                   
| |        |                                      
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and President
| |        |                                      
| | Date:  | November 18, 2007                    

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
### §5125. Acceptance of reports of private physician examinations

For purposes of establishing any claim for benefits under chapter 11 or 15 of this title, a report of a medical examination administered by a private physician that is provided by a claimant in support of a claim for benefits under that chapter may be accepted without a requirement for confirmation by an examination by a physician employed by the Veterans Health Administration if the report is sufficiently complete to be adequate for the purpose of adjudicating such claim.

(Added Pub. L. 103–446, title III, §301(b), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4658.)
### SUBCHAPTER IX—REVITALIZATION OF NASA INSTITUTIONAL CAPABILITIES
### Start | Speaker Index
2695 From Sea to Sea: Effects of Invasive Species in Ma rine Systems

Sunday, February 20, 2011: 9:00 AM 146B (Washington Convention Center )
Susan Williams , University of California, Bodega Bay, CA Non-native species have invaded over 80% of marine regions on Earth, including remote Antarctica. Over half of these species are considered harmful in their invaded habitats, causing changes in native m arine ecosystems and exacting stiff economic costs from marine industries such as shipping and aquaculture, two of the main pathways for introduct ions. Control methods are particularly challenging in the fluid ocean and thus marine invasive species management rests heavily on prevention. As countrie s adopt the international convention for the manage ment of ship ballast water and the aquaculture industry strives to follow international codes for introductions and transfer of marine species, the p revention emphasis has shifted to other important pathways, such as hull fouling and the aquarium tra de, and to emerging pathways such as plastic debris . The effects of marine invasive species are myriad : toxic microorganisms such as dinoflagellates and th e cholera bacterium can affect human health while o ther species can change food webs and disrupt ecosystem services provided by marine wetland plant s (salt marshes, seagrasses). Public attention has been diverted away from marine invasive species as awareness of ocean climate change grows, despite th e facts that marine invaders are spreading twice as fast as marine species are shifting poleward as oceans warm, and that policies and protocols have b een established for marine invasive species managem ent, unlike the daunting challenge of mitigating climate change. Ocean warming compounds the problem of marine invasive species by opening new routes f or invasions, such as the Northwest Passage which has been ice-free since 2007, and by favoring the colonization, survival, and growth of some inv asive species over native species. Marine ecosystem s should respond more easily to a rapidly warming oce an if they are protected from invasive species and other disturbances that can be effectively managed.
See more of: Invasive Species: What Harm Do They Do?

See more of: Land and Oceans See more of: Symposia

<< Previous Presentation | Next Presentation >> 

## Page 1 of 1 Abstract: From Sea to Sea: Effects of Invasive Species in Marine Systems (2011 AAAS Annual Meeting (17

- 21 February 2011))

11/22/2011 http://aaas.confex.com/aaas/2011/webprogram/Paper2695.html
EXHIBIT 10.6

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE



US$1,000.00                                                      AUGUST 19, 2005
                                                     VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA



For value received,  BRAVO RESOURCES LTD. ("Maker") promises to pay to the order
of BEN KIRK,  the sum of ONE THOUSAND  DOLLARS  (US$1,000.00),  with interest to
accrue at the rate of THREE AND  ONE-HALF  PERCENT  (3.5%) from the date of each
advance as set forth below until this Note is paid in full:

   --------------------------------------------------------------------
             DATE OF ADVANCE                  AMOUNT OF ADVANCE
   --------------------------------------------------------------------
             August 19, 2005                     US$1,000.00
   --------------------------------------------------------------------

This Note  shall be due as to each  advance  two (2) years from the date of such
advance, but in no event later than August 18, 2007.

Maker may prepay this Note at any time without penalty.

Payment of this Note is not secured.

Should legal proceedings be necessary to enforce the payment of this Note, Maker
shall be liable for all costs of collection, including attorneys' fees.

"Maker"
BRAVO RESOURCES LTD.


By:      /S/ DANIEL SAVINO
   -----------------------------------------
         Daniel Savino, President
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JESSICA N. CARDEN, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-892

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed March 21, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk 

County; Neil A. Roddenbery, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and 

Lisa B. Lott, Assistant Public Defender, 

Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

KHOUZAM, MORRIS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
### §705. Telephone service for medical officers and facility directors

The Secretary may pay for official telephone service and rental in the field whenever incurred in case of official telephones for directors of centers, hospitals, independent clinics, domiciliaries, and medical officers of the Department where such telephones are installed in private residences or private apartments or quarters, when authorized under regulations prescribed by the Secretary.

(Added Pub. L. 102–83, §2(a), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 395.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 705 was renumbered section 1905 of this title.

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 234 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 102–83, §2(a).
### §6132. Sale of articles, signs, and solicitation in Supreme Court Building and grounds

It is unlawful—

(1) to offer or expose any article for sale in the Supreme Court Building or grounds;

(2) to display a sign, placard, or other form of advertisement in the Building or grounds; or

(3) to solicit fares, alms, subscriptions, or contributions in the Building or grounds.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1183.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6132 | 40:13h. | Aug. 18, 1949, ch. 479, §3, 63 Stat. 616. |

Section
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-13-0102 - Annual Review of the Lessons-Learned Program

Accession Number: ML13254A124

Date Released: Friday, October 18, 2013

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML13254A142 - SECY-13-0102 - Annual Review of the Lessons-Learned Program (4 page(s), 9/27/2013)
    - ML13254A144 - SECY-13-0102 - Enclosure 1 - Potential Lessons-Learned Items Presented to the Lessons-Learned Oversight Board December 2011 - September 2012 (2 page(s), 9/27/2013)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
No. II-09-019 April 3, 2009 

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 562-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 562-4416 

NRC SCHEDULES OPEN HOUSE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS ON 

2008 PERFORMANCE OF SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled an open house for 

Wednesday, April 15, and will be available to discuss and answer questions about the agency’s 

assessment of safety performance during 2008 at the Sequoyah nuclear power plant. The plant, 

operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority, is located about 10 miles northeast of Chattanooga 

near the town of Soddy Daisy, Tenn. 

The open house is informal and scheduled to run from 5-7 p.m. in the training center near 

the plant. 

NRC staff will be available to answer questions on the safety performance of the 

Sequoyah plant, as well as the NRC role in ensuring safe plant operation. 

“Throughout the year, we inspect and review the performance of the Sequoyah plant and 

all commercial nuclear plants,” NRC Region II Administrator Luis Reyes said. “We issue 

several inspection reports during the year and an overall annual assessment. This open house 

allows us to discuss that assessment with local officials and people near the plant, and answer 

any questions they may have.” 

A letter sent from the NRC Region II office to plant officials addresses the performance 

of the plant during 2008 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on 

the NRC web site at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/seq_2008q4.pdf . 

The NRC found that Sequoyah’s 2008 performance met all NRC safety objectives. This 

year, the NRC plans to continue to conduct the very detailed inspections required at those plants 

operating well. In addition, the agency will complete some generic inspections, in areas ranging 

from operator licensing examinations to spent fuel storage installation and ground water 

protection at Sequoyah in 2009. 

Performance at both Sequoyah units for all of 2008 was at a level that resulted in no 

additional NRC oversight. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov 
Current performance information for Sequoyah Unit 1 is available on the NRC web site 

at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/SEQ1/seq1_chart.html . Current performance 

information for Unit 2 is at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/SEQ2/seq2_chart.html . 

###