alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §7285. Practice and registration fees

(a) The Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims may impose a reasonable periodic registration fee on persons admitted to practice before the Court. The frequency and amount of such fee shall be determined by the Court. The Court may also impose a reasonable registration fee on persons (other than judges of the Court) participating at judicial conferences convened pursuant to section 7286 of this title or in any other court-sponsored activity.

(b) Amounts received by the Court under subsection (a) of this section shall be available to the Court for the following purposes:

(1) Conducting investigations and proceedings, including employing independent counsel, to pursue disciplinary matters.

(2) Defraying the expenses of—

(A) judicial conferences convened pursuant to section 7286 of this title; and

(B) other activities and programs of the Court that are intended to support and foster communication and relationships between the Court and persons practicing before the Court or the study, understanding, public commemoration, or improvement of veterans law or of the work of the Court.

(Added Pub. L. 100–687, div. A, title III, §301(a), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4119, §4085; renumbered §7285, Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §402(b)(1), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 238; amended Pub. L. 105–368, title V, §512(a)(1), Nov. 11, 1998, 112 Stat. 3341; Pub. L. 107–103, title VI, §604(a)–(c)(1), Dec. 27, 2001, 115 Stat. 999; Pub. L. 110–389, title VI, §605, Oct. 10, 2008, 122 Stat. 4179.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2008—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 110–389 inserted "reasonable" after "impose a" in two places and struck out ", except that such amount may not exceed $30 per year" after "by the Court".

2001—Pub. L. 107–103, §604(c)(1), substituted "Practice and registration fees" for "Practice fee" in section catchline.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 107–103, §604(a), inserted at end "The Court may also impose a registration fee on persons (other than judges of the Court) participating at judicial conferences convened pursuant to section 7286 of this title or in any other court-sponsored activity."

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 107–103, §604(b), substituted "for the following purposes:" and pars. (1) and (2) for "for the purposes of (1) employing independent counsel to pursue disciplinary matters, and (2) defraying administrative costs for the implementation of the standards of proficiency prescribed for practice before the Court."

1998—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 105–368 substituted "Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims" for "Court of Veterans Appeals".

1991—Pub. L. 102–40 renumbered section 4085 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1998 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 105–368 effective on first day of first month beginning more than 90 days after Nov. 11, 1998, see section 513 of Pub. L. 105–368, set out as a note under section 7251 of this title.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL
                          EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bekem Metals, Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Marat
Cherdabayev, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



Date: August 22, 2005                                 /s/ Marat Cherdabayev
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Marat Cherdabayev,
                                                     Principal Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 23.1
                                                                    ------------





                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-45618) pertaining to the 1995 Share Option and Incentive Plan, 1998
Share Option and Incentive Plan and 2000 Employees Share Purchase Plan, of our
report dated January 18, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Precise Software Solutions Ltd. included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.






                                                   Yours Truly,

                                            /s/ Kost, Forer and Gabbay
                                      ---------------------------------------
March 19, 2000                                KOST, FORER and GABBAY
Tel-Aviv, Israel                      A Member of Ernst & Young International
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-12-0101 - Issuance of Bulletin 2012-01, "Design Vulnerability in Electric Power System"

Accession Number: ML12135A466

Date Released: Friday, April 29, 2022

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML12135A426 - SECY-12-0101- Issuance of Bulletin 2012-01, "Design Vulnerability in Electric Power System" (4 page(s), 7/20/2012)
    - ML12135A457 - SECY-12-0101 - Enclosure:  NRC Bulletin 2012-01:  Design Vulverability in Electric Power System (8 page(s), 7/20/2012)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### Rock Island Butter Company v. James Rowland.

Motion denied, without costs, with leave to respondent to file additional brief. Opinion per curiam. Order to be settled on notice. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-2067

JESINTA N. VEFONGE,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A77-892-899)

Submitted: March 16, 2005 Decided: March 25, 2005

Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bokwe G. Mofor, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D.

Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Michelle E. Gorden, Senior

Litigation Counsel, Araceli Carrigan, Senior Attorney Advisor,

Susan Lea Smith, Senior Trial Attorney, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*

On December 9, 2004, we granted the Attorney General’s motion

for partial dismissal of the petition for review on the ground that

we lack jurisdiction to review the Board’s finding that Vefonge’s

asylum application was untimely filed and to review the denial of

her request for voluntary departure.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Jesinta N. Vefonge, a native and citizen of Cameroon,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“Board”) denying her motion to reopen or reconsider its

previous decision affirming the immigration judge’s denial of her

applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection

under the Convention Against Torture. We have reviewed the record

and the Board’s order and find no abuse of discretion.

Accordingly, as to the claims over which we retain jurisdiction,*

we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the

Board. See In re: Vefonge, No. A77-892-899 (B.I.A. July 28, 2004).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50764 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ARTHUR FORMANN, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-96-CA-51

- - - - - - - - - - November 4, 1998 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Federal prisoner (#17501-077) Arthur Formann has appealed the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his motion to vacate, 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We AFFIRM. Formann is not entitled to relief on his claim that the presentence report was disclosed to him less than 10 days prior to sentencing, and that his counsel was ineffective for failing to object to this and to correct alleged inaccuracies in the presentence report. See United States v. Cervantes , 132 F.3dNo. 97-50764 -2- 1106, 1109 (5th Cir. 1998); Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 687, 690 (1984). Formann contends that he is entitled to relief on grounds that his court-appointed counsel was ineffective in numerous other respects. We have determined that the district court did not err in denying relief relative to these claims. Formann contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions. The court will not consider this claim because the evidence was held to be sufficient upon his direct appeal, United States v. Faulkner , 17 F.3d 751, 768-71 (5th Cir. 1994). See United States v. Kalish , 780 F.2d 506, 508 (5th Cir. 1986). Furthermore, Formann's claim that a government witness's testimony lacked credibility is not a valid basis for relief from a conviction. See United States v. Robles-Pantoja , 887 F.2d 1250, 1254-55 (5th Cir. 1989). Formann contends that he is entitled to relief on grounds that the trial court did not instruct the jury that materiality of a false statement is an element of willfully overvaluing land or property in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014. He relies on United States v. Wells , 519 U.S. 482, 117 S.Ct. 921 (1997). The Wells Court held, however, that "materiality of falsehood is [not] an element of the crime of knowingly making a false statement to a federally insured bank, 18 U.S.C. § 1014." 117 S. Ct. at 924. Formann contends that he should be resentenced to home confinement, on authority of U.S.S.G. §§ 5H1.1 (age) and 5H1.4No. 97-50764 -3- (poor physical condition). This claim is not cognizable in a § 2255 proceeding. See Cervantes , 132 F.3d at 1109. JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
# L_2023011EN.01001601.xml

| 12.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 11/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 11/16

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 255/2019

of 25 October 2019

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2023/78]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1854 of 27 November 2018 on recognition of the ‘Better Biomass’ voluntary scheme for demonstrating compliance with the sustainability criteria under Directives 98/70/EC and 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1854 of 27 November 2018 on recognition of the ‘Better Biomass’ voluntary scheme for demonstrating compliance with the sustainability criteria under Directives 98/70/EC and 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 6az (Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/142) of Chapter XVII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘6aza. | 32018 D 1854: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1854 of 27 November 2018 on recognition of the ‘Better Biomass’ voluntary scheme for demonstrating compliance with the sustainability criteria under Directives 98/70/EC and 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 302, 28.11.2018, p. 73).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘6aza.

32018 D 1854: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1854 of 27 November 2018 on recognition of the ‘Better Biomass’ voluntary scheme for demonstrating compliance with the sustainability criteria under Directives 98/70/EC and 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 302, 28.11.2018, p. 73).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1854 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 26 October 2019, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 25 October 2019.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gunnar PÁLSSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 302, 28.11.2018, p. 73.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jefferson Bancshares, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by
                  the Report.


         November 9, 2004       /s/ Anderson L. Smith
                                --------------------------
                                Anderson L. Smith
                                President and Chief Executive Officer



         November 9, 2004       /s/ Anderson L. Smith
                                -------------------------------------------
                                Jane P. Hutton
                                Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
#### Annette De Nicola, Respondent, v. Sandar Strasser, Appellant.

No opinion. Insofar as defendant appeals from the original judgment, the appeal is dismissed, without costs. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and MacCrate, JJ.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-11-0024 - Use of Risk Insights to Enhance the Safety Focus of Small Modular Reactor Reviews

Accession Number: ML110110688

Date Released: Friday, March 4, 2011

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML110110691 - SECY-11-0024 - Use of Risk Insights to Enhance the Safety Focus of Small Modular Reactor Reviews (10 page(s), 2/18/2011)
    - ML110110701 - SECY-11-0024 - Enclosure: NUREG-0800, Standard Review Plan, Introduction, Draft Revision 3 (24 page(s), 2/11/2011)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS350 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
#### Helen M. O’Hara, Respondent, v. John O’Hara, Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion denied. On its face the stipulation precluded this application within the five-year period. Insufficient proof was submitted to show that the later developments were not contemplated in or at the time of the stipulation. Nor was it adequately shown that the developments were such to jusify relieving plaintiff wife of the terms of the stipulation or the judgment entered thereon. Consequently, it is not necessary to consider whether power existed to modify the judgment in this particular. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Breitel and Botein, JJ.
NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS TO MEET

MAY 12-14 IN ROCKVILLE, MD.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards 

(ACRS) will hold a public meeting May 12-14 in Rockville, Md., to discuss several issues of 

current interest. Some of the topics include: 

• Final Safety Evaluation Reports associated with the license renewal application for the 

Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations; and

• The advanced reactor research plan.

The ACRS advises the Commission, independently from the NRC staff, on safety issues 

related to the licensing and operation of nuclear power plants, and in areas of health physics and 

radiation protection. The meeting will be held in Room T-2B1 of the agency’s Two White Flint 

North building, at 11545 Rockville Pike. The session on May 12 will run from 1:30 p.m. to 

7:00 p.m. The May 13 session will run from 8:30 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. and the May 14 session will 

run from 8:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. Portions of the meeting may be closed to discuss proprietary 

information, as well as organizational and personnel matters. 

A complete agenda is available on the NRC’s website at: http://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/doc-collections/acrs/agenda/2011/.

Anyone with questions or who wants to make oral statements during the meeting should 

notify Ilka Berrios at (301) 415-3179. For video conferencing services, contact Theron Brown at 

(301) 415-8066.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-072 April 28, 2011
### §6306. Policing of buildings and grounds

(a) Designation of Employees as Special Police.—Subject to section 5375 of title 5, the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, the Trustees of the National Gallery of Art, and the Trustees of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts (or their designees) may designate employees of their respective agencies as special police, without additional compensation, for duty in connection with the policing of their respective specified buildings and grounds.

(b) Powers.—The employees designated as special police under subsection (a)—

(1) may, within the specified buildings and grounds, enforce, and make arrests for violations of, sections 6302 and 6303 of this title, any regulation prescribed under section 6304 of this title, federal or state law, or any regulation prescribed under federal or state law; and

(2) may enforce concurrently with the United States Park Police the laws and regulations applicable to the National Capital Parks, and may make arrests for violations of sections 6302 and 6303 of this title, within the several areas located within the exterior boundaries of the face of the curb lines of the squares within which the specified buildings and grounds are located.

(c) Uniforms and Other Equipment.—The employees designated as special police under subsection (a) may be provided, without charge, with uniforms and other equipment as may be necessary for the proper performance of their duties, including badges, revolvers, and ammunition.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1186.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6306(a) | 40:193n. | Oct. 24, 1951, ch. 559, §1, 65 Stat. 634; Pub. L. 91–34, §2(c), June 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 41; Pub. L. 104–134, title I, §101(c) [title II, proviso in 1st par. under heading "John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts"], Apr. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 1321–193, renumbered as title I by Pub. L. 104–140, §1(a), May 2, 1996, 110 Stat. 1327. |
| 6306(b)(1) | 40:193t (words before 5th comma). | Oct. 24, 1951, ch. 559, §7, 65 Stat. 635; Pub. L. 88–391, §2, Aug. 1, 1964, 78 Stat. 365. |
| 6306(b)(2) | 40:193x. | Oct. 24, 1951, ch. 559, §11, as added Pub. L. 88–391, §4, Aug. 1, 1964, 78 Stat. 366. |
| 6306(c) | 40:193t (words after 5th comma). | |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "section 5375 of title 5" are substituted for "section 5365 of title 5" because of section 801(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (Public Law 95–454, 92 Stat. 1221), which redesignated sections 5361 through 5365 of title 5 as sections 5371 through 5375 of title 5. The words "or their designees" are substituted for "or their authorized representatives" for consistency in the revised chapter.

In subsection (b)(2), the words "within which the specified buildings and grounds are located" are substituted for "within which the aforementioned buildings are located" for clarity.