alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC PROPOSES CIVIL PENALTY FOR VIRGINIA FIRM FOR

TEMPORARY LOSS OF PORTABLE NUCLEAR GAUGE

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has proposed a $3,500 fine for an Ashburn, Va., 

engineering firm for a violation of agency requirements involving the control and security of 

NRC-licensed radioactive materials. The violation stems from the temporary loss of a portable 

nuclear gauge in December 2010 at the Fort George G. Meade Army Base, in Fort Meade, Md.

 On Dec. 2, 2010, GeoConcepts discovered that one of its portable nuclear gauges had 

been taken during a suspected theft of construction equipment. At the time, the gauge was stored 

at a temporary job site at the Army base. The gauge contains a small amount of radioactive 

material and is used for such purposes as measuring soil density at construction sites.

 The gauge was last seen on the afternoon of Nov. 29, 2010. It had been stored inside a 

lock-box and chained to the exterior of a sea-land container at the construction site. The NRC 

was notified of the missing gauge, as was the base police force. On Dec. 10, 2010, GeoConcepts 

was notified by base police that they had recovered a locked portable gauge transport case with 

the company’s name on it. Subsequent investigation determined it was the missing device and 

that it did not appear to have been tampered with.

 An NRC inspection performed in March and April 2011 found that GeoConcepts did 

not, as required by NRC regulations, use a minimum of two independent physical controls to 

secure the portable gauge from unauthorized removal, when the device was not under the control 

and constant surveillance of company personnel.

During a Predecisional Enforcement Conference with NRC staff on June 29, 2011, 

GeoConcepts representatives stated that, in their opinion, the gauge had been secured in 

accordance with NRC requirements. Specifically, it was housed inside of its locked transport 

case, which was inside of a lock box. The lock box was secured to the exterior of the sea-land 

container by a chain and lock.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region I 

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov 

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. I-11-028

Contact: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330

 Neil Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

August 9, 2011

Email: OPA1.RESOURCE@nrc.gov
However, the NRC has determined only one barrier – a single lock and chain – was 

provided to prevent removal of the lock box, which was not consistent with the requirements and 

made it easier for the gauge to be removed without authorization.

GeoConcepts has implemented actions to prevent a recurrence.

The company is required to provide the NRC with a written reply within 30 days.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website.
FILED

February 5, 1999

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

STATE OF TENNESSEE ) CANNON COUNTY

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN’S )

SERVICES, ) NO. 01A01-9806-JV-00275

Petitioner/Appellee )

v. ) HON. JOHN B. MELTON, III

) JUDGE

TAMRA LEANN VIAR, )

Respondent/Appellant )

and )

)

JOHN FITZGERALD GROSS, )

(Present Whereabouts Unknown) )

and )

)

THE UNKNOWN FATHER OF )

KATELYN NICOLE VIAR, )

(Present Whereabouts Unknown) )

Respondents. )

)

IN THE MATTER OF: )

KATELYN NICOLE VIAR )

Date of Birth: 9/22/95 )

ORDER ON PETITION TO REHEAR

We have reviewed the Petition to Rehear filed on behalf of the Attorney

General and conclude that the Petition should be denied for the following

reasons.

1. The Attorney General contends that the State has proved the gounds set out

in T.C.A. § 36-117(g)(3)(A), thereby justifying termination of parental rights. 

We find, however, that the testimony concerning the mother’s current

relationship with her child does not meet the requirements of 36-117-

(g)(3)(A)(i) and (iii) by clear and convincing evidence. 

2. The Attorney General contends that the return of the child to the custody of

her mother presents a threat to the child’s safety. We disagree, and reference

the testimony of Lynn Lawrence, Kenneth Hazel, Lorett Quarcoo, Debbie
2

Holder, Ann Richey, Rita Waller, Carolyn Thomas and Dale Peterson, all of

whom have been in personal contact with the mother and child.

The Petition to Rehear is denied at the costs of the Attorney General.

______________________________

William H. Inman, Senior Judge

_______________________________

Houston M. Goddard, Presiding Judge

_______________________________

Herschel P. Franks, Judge
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 18 (Monday, January 28, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 431]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00215]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Healthcare Delivery and Methodologies 
Integrated Review Group; Community-Level Health Promotion Study 
Section.
    Date: February 11-12, 2019.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bahia Resort Hotel, 998 West Mission Bay Drive, San 
Diego, CA 92109.
    Contact Person: Ping Wu, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 3166, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-451-8428, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d0a7a5a0e490b3a3a2febeb9b8feb7bfa6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e6919396d2a6859594c8888f8ec8818990">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in 
advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of 
December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research; 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 22, 2019.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-00215 Filed 1-25-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-KSB of Segway IVCorp. for the Year Ended December 31, 2005, I, Donny Smith, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and Chief Financial Officer of Segway IV Corp. hereby certify pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 
| 1.     | Such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005, fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and                                   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| 2.     | The information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the periodended December 31, 2005, fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Segway IV Corp. |

 
| By:    | */s/*   *Donny Smith*

Donny SmithChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  | * *                                                                                                  |

 
| Dated: | March 31, 2006 |
|--------|----------------|
EXHIBIT
32.1




DEEP
DOWN, INC.




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Deep Down, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned,
Ronald E. Smith, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)                       The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)                       The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By: /s/ RONALD E.
SMITH


Ronald E.
Smith


President
and Chief Executive Officer


March 31,
2008
### SUBCHAPTER I—EMPLOYMENT
#### § 280.200 Scope.

Section 280.201 of this part specifies that failure to take any action required by or taking any action prohibited by this part constitutes a violation of this part. Section 280.202 describes the penalties that may be imposed for violations of this part. Sections 280.204 through 280.222 establish the procedures for imposing administrative penalties for violations of this part.

[65 FR 39802, June 28, 2000]
Amendment to Employment Letter



 Exhibit 10.9Z 
 August 1, 2007 
 Richard King 
 Re: Amendment to
offer letter 
 Dear Richard, 
 Effective August 1, 2007,
your offer letter from Tercica, Inc., dated as of February 25, 2007 (the “Offer Letter”), has been amended to provide additional compensation to you as follows: Beginning August 1, 2007, you will receive a $7,000 per month
reimbursement for rental housing for you and your family in the San Francisco Bay Area until the earlier of July 31, 2008 or the first month you begin making mortgage payments for a home you have purchased in the San Francisco Bay Area (i.e.,
in such case the rental housing reimbursement will cease and the mortgage assistance payments specified in the Offer Letter will begin). 
  

	
	Very truly yours,
	
	 /s/ John A. Scarlett, M.D.

	John A. Scarlett, MD
	President and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 280.205 Representation.

A respondent individual may appear and participate in person, a corporation by a duly authorized officer or employee, and a partnership by a partner. If a respondent is represented by counsel, counsel shall be a member in good standing of the bar of any State, Commonwealth or Territory of the United States, or of the District of Columbia, or be licensed to practice law in the country in which counsel resides if not the United States. A respondent personally, or through counsel or other representative who has the power of attorney to represent the respondent, shall file a notice of appearance with the administrative law judge. The Department will be represented by the Office of Chief Counsel for Export Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# 0825 - E114 - Digital Instrumentation and Control.

Accession Number: ML12151A418

Date Released: Friday, June 29, 2012

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML12151A420 - 0825 - E114 - Digital Instrumentation and Control - 01 - Introduction and Overview. (108 page(s), 5/30/2012)
    - ML12151A422 - 0825 - E114 - Digital Instrumentation and Control - 02 - Architecture Overview. (98 page(s), 5/30/2012)
    - ML12151A423 - 0825 - E114 - Digital Instrumentation and Control - 03 - Regulatory Concerns. (47 page(s), 5/30/2012)
    - ML12151A425 - 0825 - E114 - Digital Instrumentation and Control - 04 - Qualification. (56 page(s), 5/30/2012)
    - ML12151A426 - 0825 - E114 - Digital Instrumentation and Control - 05 - Software Firmware Lifecycle Concepts. (68 page(s), 5/30/2012)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
### §1834. Nonduplication of benefits

(a) Monetary Allowance.—In the case of an eligible child under subchapter II of this chapter whose only covered birth defect is spina bifida, a monetary allowance shall be paid under subchapter I of this chapter. In the case of an eligible child under subchapter II of this chapter who has spina bifida and one or more additional covered birth defects, a monetary allowance shall be paid under subchapter II of this chapter. In the case of a child eligible for benefits under subchapter I or II of this chapter who is also eligible for benefits under subchapter III of this chapter, a monetary allowance shall be paid under the subchapter of this chapter elected by the child.

(b) Vocational Rehabilitation.—An individual may only be provided one program of vocational training under this chapter.

(Added Pub. L. 106–419, title IV, §401(b), Nov. 1, 2000, 114 Stat. 1860, §1824; renumbered §1834 and amended, Pub. L. 108–183, title I, §102(a)(1), (c), Dec. 16, 2003, 117 Stat. 2653, 2654.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1834 was renumbered section 3734 of this title.

#### Amendments

2003—Pub. L. 108–183, §102(a)(1), renumbered section 1824 of this title as this section.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 108–183, §102(c), inserted at end: "In the case of a child eligible for benefits under subchapter I or II of this chapter who is also eligible for benefits under subchapter III of this chapter, a monetary allowance shall be paid under the subchapter of this chapter elected by the child."
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2409

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to clarify that inpatient 

drug prices charged to certain public hospitals are included in the best 

price exemptions for the Medicaid drug rebate program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 10, 2003

Mr. SHADEGG (for himself, Mr. NORWOOD, Mr. MARKEY, and Mr. TOWNS) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to clarify 

that inpatient drug prices charged to certain public hospitals are included in the best price exemptions for the 

Medicaid drug rebate program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safety Net Hospital 

5 Pharmacy Access Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY. 

7 The constitutional authority upon which this Act 

8 rests is the power of the Congress to regulate commerce 
2

•HR 2409 IH 

1 with foreign nations and among the several States, set 

2 forth in section 8 of article I of the Constitution of the 

3 United States. 

4 SEC. 3. CLARIFICATION OF INCLUSION OF INPATIENT 

5 DRUG PRICES CHARGED TO CERTAIN PUBLIC 

6 HOSPITALS IN THE BEST PRICE EXEMPTIONS 

7 FOR THE MEDICAID DRUG REBATE PRO8 GRAM. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1927(c)(1)(C)(i)(I) of the 

10 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r–8(c)(1)(C)(i)(I)) is 

11 amended by inserting before the semicolon the following: 

12 ‘‘(including inpatient prices charged to hospitals described 

13 in section 340B(a)(4)(L) of the Public Health Service 

14 Act)’’. 

15 (b) ANTI-DIVERSION PROTECTION.—Section 

16 1927(c)(1)(C) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r–8(c)(1)(C)) 

17 is amended by adding at the end the following: 

18 ‘‘(iii) APPLICATION OF AUDITING AND

19 RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS.—With 

20 respect to a covered entity described in 

21 section 340B(a)(4)(L) of the Public Health 

22 Service Act, any drug purchased for inpa23 tient use shall be subject to the auditing 

24 and recordkeeping requirements described 
3

•HR 2409 IH 

1 in section 340B(a)(5)(C) of the Public 

2 Health Service Act.’’. 

3 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 this section take effect on October 1, 2003.

Æ
No: I-13-042 December 5, 2013

CONTACT: Diane Screnci 610-337-5330

 Neil Sheehan 610-337-5331

NRC Assigns New Resident Inspector to Pilgrim Station

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia, Pa., have 

selected Brian Scrabeck as the new resident inspector at the Pilgrim nuclear power 

plant in Plymouth, Mass. Scrabeck joins NRC senior resident inspector Max 

Schneider at the plant, which is operated by Entergy Nuclear.

Scrabeck joined the NRC May 20, 2012, as a project engineer in the 

Region I Division of Reactor Projects. Prior to joining the agency, Scrabeck

worked at the James A. FitzPatrick plant in Scriba, N.Y., as a senior reactor 

operator. He served in the United States Navy as a submarine officer aboard the USS Parche, and in the 

United States Marine Corps as a reconnaissance marine and cryptologic linguist. Scrabeck earned a 

bachelor of science in aerospace engineering from the U.S. Naval Academy and a master’s in engineering 

management from Old Dominion University. 

“Brian has the training, experience and commitment to safety that is needed for the NRC to carry 

out its mission of protecting people and the environment, and he will help ensure the safe operations of 

Pilgrim,” said NRC Region I Administrator Bill Dean.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They serve as the 

agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major work projects and 

interacting with plant workers and the public. Resident Inspectors can be assigned to any one site for up to 

seven years.

The Pilgrim resident inspectors can be reached at 508-747-0565.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL**

**FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Bekem Metals, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the *“Report”*), I, Yermek Kudabayev, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

 
| Date: May 8, 2007 | By: | /s/ Yermek Kudabayev |  
 

Yermek Kudabayev, Principal Financial Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  |
|-------------------|-----|----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Anthony Biondolillo, Respondent.

Appeal by the People of the State of Rew York from an order of the County Court, Kings County, which granted a motion in the nature of *coram*nobis, and vacated a sentence previously imposed on respondent in that court. On the trial which resulted in the sentence which was vacated, respondent had been represented by counsel. When he appeared for sentence, however, he was not so represented, nor was he advised of his right to counsel at that time. Before imposing sentence the County Judge stated to respondent, a second felony offender, that he did not think that there was much that a lawyer could do for respondent, and asked him if he wanted a lawyer to appear for him before judgment was pronounced. Respondent answered that he did not. The court therefore pronounced the judgment which was required by the statute. (Penal Law, § 1941.) The sentence has been vacated upon the ground that section 308 of the Code of Criminal Procedure requires that a defendant who appears for sentence in a criminal action, without counsel, must be advised of his right to be represented by counsel, and that the failure so to advise the respondent in the instant case deprived the County Court of jurisdiction to pronounce judgment. Order reversed on the law and motion to vacate judgment denied. On the record presented, respondent was not deprived of any right provided by section 308 of the Code of Criminal Procedure *(People*v. *Be Maio,*279 App. Div. 596, affd. 303 R. Y. 939), nor was he deprived of his right to be represented by counsel or denied due process of law in violation of his constitutional rights. He was no stranger to criminal procedure, and suffered no disadvantage, insofar as the record discloses, from the expression of opinion by the County Judge that counsel could be of little assistance to him, particularly when that expression of opinion was coupled with what appears to have been an offer to assign counsel if respondent so desired. Rolan, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, MacCrate and Beldoek, JJ., concur.
#### § 8.4 Positions excepted from the application of this part.

This part shall not apply to positions in Hawaii, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and Alaska, and on the Isthmus of Panama.
EXHIBIT 32.2  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the filing of
the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) by Gold Horse International, Inc. (the Registrant), I, Adam Wasserman, Chief Financial Officer of
the Registrant, hereby certify that:  1.
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
  2.
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of Registrant.
  /s/ Adam Wasserman Name: Adam Wasserman Title: Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer  Dated: August 1, 2008  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.