alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1025.66 Qualifications and standards of conduct. ( a ) *Good faith transactions.* The Commission expects all persons appearing in proceedings before the Commission or the Presiding Officer to act with integrity, with respect, and in an ethical manner. Business transacted before and with the Commission or the Presiding Officer shall be conducted in good faith.
( b ) *Exclusion of parties, participants, or their representatives.* To maintain orderly proceedings, the Commission or the Presiding Officer may exclude parties, participants, or their representatives for refusal to comply with directions, continued use of dilatory tactics, refusal to adhere to reasonable standards of orderly and ethical conduct, failure to act in good faith, or violation of the prohibition in § 1025.68 against certain *ex parte* communications.
( c ) *Exclusions from the record.* The Presiding Officer or the Commission may disregard and order the exclusion from the record of any written or oral submissions or representations which are not made in good faith or which are unfair, incomplete, or inaccurate.
( d ) *Appeal by excluded party.* An excluded party, participant, or representative may petition the Commission to entertain an interlocutory appeal in accordance with § 1025.24 of these rules. If, after such appeal, the representative of a party or participant is excluded, the hearing shall, at the request of the party or participant, be suspended for a reasonable time so that the party or participant may obtain another representative.
Search For Partners,  March 16, 1999

----

The Business Information Service for the Newly Independent States (BISNIS) is the U.S.government's clearinghouse for trade and investment information on the Newly IndependentStates of the former Soviet Union.  BISNIS publishes SEARCH FOR PARTNERS to help U.S.companies find investment opportunities in the expanding markets of the former SovietUnion.
SEARCH FOR PARTNERS is distributed via this biweekly e-mail broadcast, and a limitedselection of these leads are published in a monthly newsletter.  Previous e-mail broadcasts areavailable through the BISNIS home page, at: http://www.mac.doc.gov/bisnis.  To receive thebiweekly report, e-mail BISNIS at [email protected] or call (202) 482-4655.  These opportunitiesare provided solely as an informational service and do not represent an endorsement by the U.S.Department of Commerce.  Verification of these leads is the responsibility of the reader.
Index of Investment Opportunities:
###### Editorial Note on Part 8b

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 8b appear at 68 FR 51353, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 8b.26 Procedures.

The enforcement provisions applicable to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 found at §§ 8.7 through 8.15 of this subtitle shall apply to this part.
§ 1028.120 Evaluation and disposition of applications and proposals for research to be conducted or supported by a Federal department or agency. ( a ) The department or agency head will evaluate all applications and proposals involving human subjects submitted to the Federal department or agency through such officers and employees of the Federal department or agency and such experts and consultants as the department or agency head determines to be appropriate. This evaluation will take into consideration the risks to the subjects, the adequacy of protection against these risks, the potential benefits of the research to the subjects and others, and the importance of the knowledge gained or to be gained.
( b ) On the basis of this evaluation, the department or agency head may approve or disapprove the application or proposal, or enter into negotiations to develop an approvable one.
Editorial Note on Part 922
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

§ 922.113 Permit procedures and issuance criteria. ( a ) A person may conduct an activity otherwise prohibited by § 922.112(a)(2) through (7) if the activity is specifically authorized by and conducted in accordance with the scope, purpose, terms and conditions of a permit issued under this section and subpart D of this part.
( b ) Applications for permits should be addressed to the Director, Office of National Marine Sanctuaries; ATTN: Superintendent, Cordell Bank National Marine Sanctuary, P.O. Box 159, Olema, CA 94950.
[88 FR 19827, Apr. 4, 2023]
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Maurice Block, Appellant, and Manfred Weiss et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur. [200 Misc. 473.]
Exhibit 32.0

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jefferson Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the
period covered by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |                                                 
|----------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------
|November 12, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Anderson L. Smith                           
|                  |  |  |  | Anderson L. Smith                               
|                  |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer           
|                  |  | 
|November 12, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Jane P. Hutton                              
|                  |  |  |  | Jane P. Hutton                                  
|                  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the annual report of Worldwide Manufacturing USA, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Jimmy Wang, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Jimmy Wang

Jimmy Wang

Chief Executive Officer

Date:  March 31, 2005
§ 1101.26 Circumstances when the Commission does not provide notice and opportunity to comment. ( a ) *Notice to the extent practicable.* Section 6(b)(1) requires that “to the extent practicable” the Commission must provide manufacturers and private labelers notice and opportunity to comment before disclosing information from which the public can ascertain readily their identity.
( b ) *Circumstances when notice and opportunity to comment is not practicable.* The Commission has determined that there are various circumstances when notice and opportunity to comment is *not* practicable. Examples include the following: ( 1 ) When the Commission has taken reasonable steps to assure that the company to which the information pertains is out of business and has no identifiable successor.
( 2 ) When the information is disclosed in testimony in response to an order of the court during litigation to which the Commission is not a party.
# L_2019036EN.01006201.xml

| 7.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 36/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 36/62

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 101/2017

of 5 May 2017

amending Annex XXI (Statistics) to the EEA Agreement [2019/213]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2304 of 19 December 2016 on the modalities, structure, periodicity and assessment indicators of the quality reports on data transmitted pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 549/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2304 of 19 December 2016 on the modalities, structure, periodicity and assessment indicators of the quality reports on data transmitted pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 549/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 19zb (Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/1365) of Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘19zc. | 32016 R 2304: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2304 of 19 December 2016 on the modalities, structure, periodicity and assessment indicators of the quality reports on data transmitted pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 549/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 345, 20.12.2016, p. 27).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘19zc.

32016 R 2304: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2304 of 19 December 2016 on the modalities, structure, periodicity and assessment indicators of the quality reports on data transmitted pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 549/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 345, 20.12.2016, p. 27).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2304 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 6 May 2017, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 5 May 2017.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 345, 20.12.2016, p. 27.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
§ 930.128 Public notice, comment period, and public hearing. ( a ) The Secretary shall provide public notice of the appeal within 30 days after the receipt of the Notice of Appeal by publishing a Notice in the Federal Register and in a publication of general circulation in the immediate area of the coastal zone likely to be affected by the proposed activity.
( b ) Except in the case of appeals involving energy projects, the Secretary shall provide a 30-day period for the public and interested Federal agencies to comment on the appeal. Notice of the public and Federal agency comment period shall be provided in the Notice required in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) ( 1 ) The Secretary shall accord greater weight to those Federal agencies whose comments are within the subject areas of their technical expertise.
( 2 ) The Secretary may, on the Secretary's own initiative or upon written request, for good cause shown, reopen the period for Federal agency comments before the closure of the decision record.
( d ) Except in the case of appeals involving energy projects, the Secretary may hold a public hearing in response to a request or on the Secretary's own initiative. A request for a public hearing must be filed with the Secretary within 30 days of the publication of the Notice in the Federal Register required in paragraph (a) of this section. If a hearing is held by the Secretary, it shall be noticed in the Federal Register and guided by the procedures described within § 930.113. If a hearing is held by the Secretary, the Federal Register notice for the hearing shall reopen the public and Federal agency comment period and shall close such comment period 10 days after the hearing.
[71 FR 831, Jan. 5, 2006]
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00426-CR

Charleston Lamon Moody

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 213th District Court

of Tarrant Coun ty (1435754D)

July 20, 2017

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appe al is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Terrie Livingston

Chief Justice Terrie Livingston
Adams, Kevin {OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Gentlemen, 

Eric Bookmeyer <ebookmeyer@masoncity.net> 

Tuesday, March 11, 2014 1:24 PM 

Devany, Dennis (OST); Adams, Kevin (OST); Schlemmer, Kevin (OST); 

Pam Osgood '_, 

The US DOT is requesting community comments, as specified in the DOT Order Requesting proposals for Mason City's 

Essential Air Service carrier, to be submitted by March 14, 2014. While we are grateful that the DOT requested these 

proposals on an expedited basis, we must request a 7-day extension to the comment period in order to have more time 

to consider both proposals. 

Fort Dodge is included in the same DOT Order and concurs with the extension request. 

Respectfully, 

Eric Bookmeyer, Mayor 

City of Mason City 

10 First Street NW 

Mason City, lA 50401 

641-421-3600 

mayor@masoncity.net 

NOTICE: Subject to the requirements of the Iowa Open Records Act, this message and accompanying documents are 

covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Subsection 2510-252, as amended, and contains 

information intended for the specified individual(s) only. This information may be confidential. If you are not the 

intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you 

have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, copying, or the taking of any action based on 

the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us 

immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message. Thank you. 

1
### SUBCHAPTER I—ESTABLISHMENT OF ADMINISTRATION AND AWARDING OF GRANTS FOR PROGRAMS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kevin D. McClain, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[821 NYS2d 522]

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Frank E Geraci, Jr., J.), rendered May 23, 2003. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the second degree (seven counts) and attempted robbery in the second degree (two counts).

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is reversed on the law, the plea is vacated, those parts of the motion seeking to suppress physical evidence seized from defendant’s vehicle, showup identifications and statements made by defendant to the police are granted and the matter is remitted to Monroe County Court for further proceedings on the indictment.

Same memorandum as in *People v McClain*(32 AD3d 1261 [2006]).

All concur, Hayes, J, not participating. Present — Gorski, J.P., Martoche, Green, Pine and Hayes, JJ.
#### Martin et al. v. Smith’s Ex’r et al.

November 14, 1947.

Rehearing denied June 25, 1948.

Faulkner & Faulkner for appellants.

Combs & Combs and Clark Pratt for appéllees.

Opinion of the Court by

Stanley, Commissioner

Affirming.

*611So far as we are able to ascertain from this large and' confusing record, built up over a period of ten years of litigation, plus the inclusion of records in former suits, the question is the title to portions of three tracts. Particularizing, it seems to be a question of locating division lines between the parties and whether or not their predecessors in title many years ago agreed upon the boundary. The case involves lines of Esau Hammons’ 1500-acre patent on the waters of Walker’s Branch of Troublesome Creek, in Knott County, and of three adjacent or partially overlapping patents of John Walker to 100, 200 and 700 acres, respectively.

The circuit court found the division lines to be as claimed by the plaintiffs, and also found that there was an agreement fixing those lines as the boundary between the tracts of land now owned by the parties to this suit. The court dismissed the several counterclaims of the defendants and enjoined them from trespassing upon the property of the plaintiffs as established by the judgment.

The controversy is essentially over the facts, or rather the proper or correct deductions from certain surveys and deeds and from overt acts of the predecessors of these parties. The case involves no new principle of law. It would avail nothing to the parties or to the public to endeavor to digest the indigestible evidence and spread it and the respective contentions of the parties over many pages. We have studied the voluminous briefs and considered extended oral arguments. In all probability as an original decision we would reach the same conclusion as the chancellor. In any event, we cannot say that the judgment upon the contradictory evidence is erroneous. •

Wherefore the judgment is affirmed.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3475 

To protect information received by the Commissioner of Social Security 

related to deceased individuals. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2011 

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas (for himself, Mr. BERG, Mr. BRADY of Texas, 

Mr. HERGER, Ms. JENKINS, Mr. MARCHANT, Mr. SCHOCK, and Mr. 

TIBERI) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To protect information received by the Commissioner of 

Social Security related to deceased individuals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Keeping IDs Safe Act 

5 of 2011’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3475 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROTECTING INFORMATION RECEIVED BY THE 

2 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY RE3 LATED TO DECEASED INDIVIDUALS. 

4 Section 205(r) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

5 405) is amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (5) by striking ‘‘for statistical 

7 and research activities’’ and all that follows and in8 serting ‘‘for law enforcement, tax administration, 

9 and statistical and research activities conducted by 

10 Federal agencies and for statistical and research ac11 tivities conducted by State agencies.’’; and 

12 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

13 paragraph: 

14 ‘‘(10) Information related to a deceased individual re15 ceived by the Commissioner of Social Security other than 

16 as described in paragraph (1) shall be treated for purposes 

17 of paragraph (6) in the same manner as information re18 ceived as described in paragraph (1).’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
SERVED OCTOBER 11, 2011 

-iPARTMENT Oi-

• iJAMSPORT/VTION ^ 

: :GCKET OPERATIONS 

- -••;• > -./^ t 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

T GI FREIGH T 

FAA DOCKET No. CP10NM0012 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMSNo. FAA-20I0-1079 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE 

The Motion of Respondent TGI Freight ("Respondent") for a two-day extension 

of time in which to file an answer to the Motion for Decision filed by Complainant 

Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainanl") ishercby GRANTED. " 

V - (>vc>ix.cJL ( ^ 

Attachment - Service List 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 
FAA Docket No. CP1ONM00I2 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE UST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Rebecca J. Hozubin, Respondent's Counsel 

Wilkcrson Hozubin 

310 K Street, Suite 405 

Anchorage, AK 99501 

TEL: 907-276-5297 

FAX: 907-276-5291 

Howard L. Martin, Jr., Complainant's Counsel 

Regional Counsel, Office of Regional Counsel, AAL-7 

Alaskan Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

222 W. 7"^ Avenue #14 

Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 

TEL: 907-271-5273 

FAX: 907-271-2800 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Lcrw Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 ' ;-

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administralion, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suile 2WI0Q0, Wasliingtoii, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
### SUBCHAPTER XVI—STUDIES
#### In the Matter of A.C.S. Child Support Litigation Unit, Respondent, v David S., Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 172]

Order, Family Court, New York County (M. Jay Segal, Referee), entered on or about March 14, 2005, which denied appellant putative father’s motion to vacate an order of filiation entered on default, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

First of all, appellant failed to show excusable default. Notwithstanding his three-year prison sentence, the paternity proceeding, including the order to take a DNA test, was commenced more than five months before appellant was incarcerated. He already was aware of the proceeding, and his conclusory statements that he did not know he could seek assistance while incarcerated are not credible. It is also noteworthy that appellant waited almost three months after he was released before making the within motion.

Appellant also failed to raise a meritorious defense. He adduces no evidence to contradict the mother’s sworn testimony in the prior proceedings that she had sexual relations only with him during the likely period of conception *(see Fitzgerald v Tamola,*199 AD2d 122 [1993]). His “doubt” that he is the subject child’s father, based on hearsay neighborhood rumors and his having been told he is not the father by the child’s present custodian (the sister of the child’s recently deceased mother), does not constitute contradictory evidence. The aunt certainly did not say anything at the hearing on appellant’s motion that could be understood as an admission that he is not the father, or indeed that she had knowledge on the issue of his *725paternity one way or the other. Significantly, appellant never denied having sexual relations with the child’s mother in the critical time frame. Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Marlow, Nardelli and Sweeny, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

I, Mark H. McKinnies, as Chief Financial Officer of ADA-Es, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1)         the Company’sQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)         the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

/s/ Mark H. McKinnies

Name:     Mark H. McKinnies 

Title:       Chief Financial Officer 

Date:       May 13, 2010