alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §5713. Disobedience to subpoena

In case of disobedience to any such subpoena, the aid of any district court of the United States may be invoked in requiring the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of documentary evidence, and such court within the jurisdiction of which the inquiry is carried on may, in case of contumacy or refusal to obey a subpoena issued to any officer, agent, or employee of any corporation or to any other person, issue an order requiring such corporation or other person to appear or to give evidence touching the matter in question; and any failure to obey such order of the court may be punished by such court as a contempt thereof.

(Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1237, §3313; renumbered §5713, Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §402(b)(1), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 238; Pub. L. 102–54, §14(d)(6)(A), (B), June 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 286.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–40 renumbered section 3313 of this title as this section.

Pub. L. 102–54 amended section as in effect immediately before the enactment of Pub. L. 102–40 by substituting "subpoena" for "subpena" in section catchline and in two places in text.
#### § 905.1 Scope.

This part applies to the use, in enforcement proceedings conducted pursuant to the Magnuson Act, the MMPA, and the ESA, of information collected by voluntary fishery data collectors.
Exhibit
32.3
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I,
Anthony J. Branca, Chief Financial Officer of ICON Capital Corp., the Manager of
the Registrant, in connection with the Quarterly Report of ICON Income Fund
Ten, LLC (the “LLC”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Quarterly Report”) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that::
 
 1.
              The
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
 
 2.
              The
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the LLC.
 
 Date:
May ­­19, 2008
 
 /s/Anthony J.
Branca
 Anthony
J. Branca
 Chief
Financial Officer
 ICON
Capital Corp.
 Manager
of ICON Income Fund Ten, LLC
No: 13-059 July 9, 2013

CONTACT: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200 

NRC Publishes Annual Report to Congress on Nuclear Security Inspections

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has made available to the public an unclassified version of 

its annual report to Congress detailing the previous year’s security inspection program. The report is 

required under the Energy Policy Act of 2005.

The report covers the NRC’s security inspection program, including force-on-force exercises, 

for commercial nuclear power plants and Category I fuel cycle facilities for calendar year 2012.

“This report describes NRC’s efforts to ensure the protection of the nation’s nuclear power 

infrastructure against terrorist attacks,” said NRC Chairman Allison Macfarlane. “The NRC is 

committed to ensuring the nation’s commercial nuclear facilities continue to be safe and secure.”

During 2012, the NRC conducted 173 baseline security inspections at commercial nuclear 

power plants and 23 force-on-force inspections, which use a well-trained mock adversary force to test a 

facility’s security posture. These inspections identified 153 findings, of which 146 were of very low 

security significance and seven were greater than very low security significance. By comparison, there 

were 217 security inspections (193 baseline and 24 force-on-force) and 151 findings in 2011, of which 

140 were of very low security significance and 11 of greater than very low security significance.

Whenever a finding is identified during a security inspection, the NRC ensures the issue is 

corrected immediately or compensatory measures are put in place, if necessary. Details of security 

findings are considered sensitive and not released to the public.
#### J. C. Lyons Sons Co., Respondent, v. Firoz Realty Corporation, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

(Appeal No. 2.)

Settle order on notice. Present — Townley, Grlennon, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.
No. 14- 14 -00472- CR In the Court of Appeals For the Fourteenth District of Texas At Houston

 No. 1322772 In the 263rd Judicial District Court Of Harris County, Texas

 CHRISTOPHER ANDREW JACKSON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS Appellee

 STATE’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF

 TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

THE STATE OF TEXAS, pursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 2 & 10.5, moves for

an extension of time in which to file its appellate brief and in its motion, would

show the Court the following:

1. The appellant was charged with Murder (CR -39). After a trial, the jury found appellant guilty of the offense as charged and assessed punishment at 45 years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (CR-318). The appellant subsequently filed notice of appeal, and the trial court certified that he had the right to appeal (CR

– 321, 324 ).

2. The State’s brief is due March 27 , 2015. The State hereby requests an

extension for the filing of the State’s brief until April 27, 2015

. ACCEPTED 14-14-00472-CR FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/27/2015 7:26:08 AM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK3. The following facts are relied upon to show good cause for a n extension

of time to allow the State to file its brief :

The State has been working on and has filed the following briefs in the last thirty days.

Hollins v. State 1

- 14

- 00744

- CR State’s Brief filed March 4, 2015

Campbell v. State 1

- 14

- 00 807

- CR State’s Bri ef filed March 11, 2015

Ex Parte McGuire 14

- 14

- 01010

- CR State’s Brief filed March 1 6 , 2015

Le v. State 14

- 14

- 00043

- CR State ’ s Brief filed March 24, 2015

Furthermore , the undersigned attorney has been assigned the following briefs in addition to the brief in this cause number

.
Efran Lopez 14

- 14

- 00758

- CR State’s Brief due April 9, 2015

Dorsey v State 1

- 14

- 00685

- CR State’s Brief due April 14, 2015

Allen v State 14

- 14

- 00842

- CR State ’ s Brief due April 8, 20154. This is the State’s first request for an extension of time to file its brief.WHEREFORE, the Stat e prays that this Court will grant the requested

extension.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Kimberly Stelter K IMBERLY S TELTER Assistant District Attorney Harris County, Texas 1201 Franklin, Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77002

- 1923 (713) 755

- 5826 St elter_Kimberly @dao.hctx.net TBC No. 19141400

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing instrument will be served by efile.txcourts.gov to:

Jerome Godinich, Jr. Attorney at Law 929 Pres t on, Suite 200 The Kiam Building Houston, Texas 77002

/s/ Kimberly Stelter
K IMBERLY S TELTER Assistant District Attorney Harris County, Texas 1201 Franklin, Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77002

- 1 923 (713) 755

- 5826

Date : March 27 , 2015
| **INCOME TAXES (Narrative) (Details)**                    | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|----------------|----------------|
||
| **Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]**                      |           |           |   |   |
| Effective tax rate on earnings from continuing operations | 23.90%         | (1.40%)        | 23.30% | 22.50% |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Percentage of current income tax expense (benefit) and deferred income tax expense (benefit) pertaining to continuing operations.
+ References
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 740 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 12 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=121826272&loc=d3e32687-109319
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_EffectiveIncomeTaxRateContinuingOperations**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**dtr-types:percentItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_IncomeTaxDisclosureAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
NRC CONCLUDES HEARING ON VOGTLE NEW REACTORS,

FIRST-EVER COMBINED LICENSES TO BE ISSUED

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has concluded its mandatory hearing on Southern 

Nuclear Operating Company’s (SNC) application for two Combined Licenses (COL) at the Vogtle 

site in Georgia. In a 4-1 vote, the Commission found the staff’s review adequate to make the 

necessary regulatory safety and environmental findings, clearing the way for the NRC’s Office of 

New Reactors to issue the COLs.

The Commission imposed a condition on the COLs requiring inspection and testing of squib 

valves, important components of the new reactors’ passive cooling system.

The NRC staff is expected to issue the COLs within 10 business days. The COLs will 

authorize SNC to build and operate two AP1000 reactors at the Vogtle site, adjacent to the 

company’s existing reactors approximately 26 miles southeast of Augusta, Ga. NRC construction 

inspectors have been on-site since April 2010, examining SNC’s activities to prepare the plant’s 

foundation under a Limited Work Authorization the NRC issued on Aug. 26, 2009.

SNC submitted its COL application on March 28, 2008, and supplemented the application 

on Oct. 2, 2009. The NRC’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) independently 

reviewed aspects of the application that concern safety, as well as a draft of the staff’s Final Safety 

Evaluation Report (FSER). The ACRS provided the results of its review to the Commission in a 

report dated Jan. 24, 2011. The NRC completed its environmental review and issued a Final 

Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Vogtle COLs on March 24, 2011. The NRC 

completed and issued the FSER on Aug. 9, 2011. 

The NRC certified Westinghouse’s amended AP1000 design on Dec. 30, 2011. The AP1000

is a 1,100 megawatt electric pressurized-water reactor that includes passive safety features that 

would cool down the reactor after an accident without the need for electricity or human 

intervention. 

###

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should contact 

the Office of Public Affairs beforehand.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 12-013 February 9, 2012
News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES link 

on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to 

NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov
### **CHAPTER 155—FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE**

Sec.
15501.
Economic and infrastructure development grants.
15502.
Comprehensive economic and infrastructure development plans.
15503.
Approval of applications for assistance.
15504.
Program development criteria.
15505.
Local development districts and organizations.
15506.
Supplements to Federal grant programs.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–334, title VI, §6304(g), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4752, renumbered chapter 3 of subtitle V of this title as chapter 155 of this title.
1 The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United St ates District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 08-1685

___________ United States of America, * * Plaintiff – Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Northern District of Iowa. Abdel-Illah Elmardoudi, also known as * Hussein Mohsen Safieddine, also * known as George Labibe, also known * as Abdullah, also known as Jean-Pierre * [UNPUBLISHED] Tardelli, * * Defendant – Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: March 4, 2009 Filed: March 9, 2009

___________ Before BYE, JOHN R. GIBSON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Abdel-Ilah Elmardoudi conditionally plead ed guilty to one count of misuse of a Social Security number in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 408(a)(7)(A ), and was sentenced to sixty months imprisonment. On app eal, he challenges the district court's 1 denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment base d on his constitutional speedy trial and pre--2- indictment delay claims, as well as his sentence. Having considered Elmardoudi’s arguments for reversal and conduc ted the appropriate review, see United States v. Zastrow , 534 F.3d 854, 856 (8th Cir. 2008) (standard of review for a criminal sentence), United States v. Aldaco , 477 F.3d 1008, 1016 (8th Ci r. 2007) (standard of review for a constitutional speedy trial claim), United States v. Gladney , 474 F.3d 1027, 1030 (8th Cir. 2007) (standard of re view for a constitutional pre-indictment delay claim), we find no reason to overturn the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TIMOTHY BROCK,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 458 WAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 30th day of May, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. §1350

I, David H. Fleischman, Chief
Financial Officer of TradeStation Group, Inc., hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K of TradeStation Group,
Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TradeStation Group, Inc.

The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



|               |  |                                                                 
|-------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|March 13, 2008 |  | /s/ David H. Fleischman                                         
|Date           |  | David H. Fleischman                                             
|               |  | Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of Finance
and Treasurer
### §18. Same; parliamentary procedure at joint session

While the two Houses shall be in session as provided in this chapter, the President of the Senate shall have power to preserve order; and no debate shall be allowed and no question shall be put by the presiding officer except to either House on a motion to withdraw under section 15(d)(2)(C)(i).

(June 25, 1948, ch. 644, 62 Stat. 676; Sept. 3, 1954, ch. 1263, §3, 68 Stat. 1227; Pub. L. 117–328, div. P, title I, §110(b), (c)(2), Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5240.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–328, §110(c)(2), substituted "session" for "meeting" in section catchline and text.

Pub. L. 117–328, §110(b), inserted "under section 15(d)(2)(C)(i)" after "motion to withdraw".

1954—Act Sept. 3, 1954, substituted "chapter" for "subchapter".
§ 551.704 Claimant's representative. A claimant may designate a representative to assist in preparing or presenting a claim. The claimant must designate the representative in writing. A representative may not participate in OPM interviews unless specifically requested to do so by OPM. An agency may disallow a claimant's representative who is a Federal employee in any of the following circumstances: ( a ) When the individual's activities as a representative would cause a conflict of interest or position;
( b ) When the designated representative cannot be released from his or her official duties because of the priority needs of the Government; or
( c ) When the release of the designated representative would give rise to unreasonable costs to the Government.
NRC NAMES NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR 

AT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Atlanta have selected Tim Hoeg as the 

senior resident inspector for Florida Power & Light Co.’s Turkey Point nuclear power plant, 

located near Homestead, Fla., about 20 miles south of Miami. Hoeg joins NRC resident inspector 

Martha Barillas.

Before being assigned to the Turkey Point site, Hoeg had served 

since 2005 as the senior resident inspector at FPL’s St. Lucie nuclear 

power plant near Jensen Beach, Fla. Before that assignment, Hoeg was the 

senior resident inspector for four years at the Grand Gulf nuclear power 

plant near Port Gibson, Miss. Hoeg also worked as a resident inspector at

the Calvert Cliffs nuclear power plant in Maryland. 

He joined the NRC in March 1997 as a reactor engineer in the 

NRC’s Region I office in King of Prussia, Pa. Prior to joining the NRC, Hoeg worked as a 

system engineer for Public Service Electric and Gas Co. at its Salem Generating Station near 

Salem, N.J., and he also worked as a shift test engineer for General Dynamics Electric Boat in 

Groton, Conn. Hoeg also served in the U.S. Navy and retired from the Naval Reserve in 2005.

Hoeg received a Bachelor of Science Degree in Mechanical Engineering from Florida 

Atlantic University in Boca Raton.

“Tim Hoeg has the experience and dedication to carry out the NRC mission of protecting 

people and the environment by helping to ensure the safety of the Turkey Point plant,” said NRC 

Region II Administrator Victor McCree. 

At least two NRC resident inspectors are assigned to each operating U.S. commercial 

nuclear plant. They serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, 

monitoring major work projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. Resident 

inspectors can serve at a reactor site for up to seven years. 

The Turkey Point resident inspectors can be reached at 305-245-7669.

###

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No: II-13-002

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416 

 January 15, 2013

E-mail: OPA2.Resource@nrc.gov
News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.
### §12. Failure of certificates of electors to reach President of the Senate or Archivist of the United States; demand on State for certificate

When, after the meeting of the electors shall have been held, no certificate of vote mentioned in sections 9 and 11 of this title from any State shall have been received by the President of the Senate or by the Archivist of the United States by the fourth Wednesday in December, the President of the Senate or, if the President of the Senate be absent from the seat of government, the Archivist of the United States shall request, by the most expeditious method available, the chief election officer of the State to send up the certificate lodged with such officer by the electors of such State; and it shall be the duty of such chief election officer of the State upon receipt of such request immediately to transmit same by the most expeditious method available to the President of the Senate at the seat of government.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 644, 62 Stat. 674; Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 655, §8, 65 Stat. 712; Pub. L. 98–497, title I, §107(e)(1), (2)(B), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2291; Pub. L. 117–328, div. P, title I, §108(a), Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5237.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–328, §108(a)(1)–(4), (6)–(8), inserted ", after the meeting of the electors shall have been held," after "When", struck out "and list" after "certificate of vote" and after "send up the certificate", and substituted "in December," for "in December, after the meeting of the electors shall have been held,", "or, if the President of the Senate be absent" for "or, if he be absent", "lodged with such officer" for "lodged with him", "the duty of such chief election officer of the State" for "his duty", and "by the most expeditious method available" for "by registered mail".

Pub. L. 117–328, §108(a)(5), which directed substitution of "chief election officer" for "secretary of State", was executed by making the substitution for "secretary of state" to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

1984—Pub. L. 98–497 substituted "Archivist of the United States" for "Administrator of General Services" in section catchline and two places in text.

1951—Act Oct. 31, 1951, substituted "Administrator of General Services" for "Secretary of State" in section catchline and two places in text.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–497 effective Apr. 1, 1985, see section 301 of Pub. L. 98–497, set out as a note under section 2102 of Title 44, Public Printing and Documents.
#### Abraham Steinbach and Another, Copartners, etc., Respondents, v. Israel Kanowitz and Another, Copartners, etc., Appellants.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs on *Niche*v. *Ayer*(141 App. Div. 576). Present — Clarke, P. J., Scott, Smith, Page and Davis, JJ.