alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §124. Agency use of amounts for property management

Amounts appropriated, allocated, or available to a federal agency for purposes similar to the purposes in section 121 of this title or subchapter I (except section 506), II, or III of chapter 5 of this title may be used by the agency for the disposition of property under this subtitle, and for the care and handling of property pending the disposition, if the Director of the Office of Management and Budget authorizes the use.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1071.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 124 | 40:475(b). | June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title VI, §603(b), formerly §503(b), 63 Stat. 403; renumbered [§] 603(b), Sept. 5, 1950, ch. 849, §6(a), (b), 64 Stat. 583. |

Section

The words "heretofore or hereafter" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "Director of the Office of Management and Budget" are substituted for "Director of the Bureau of the Budget" in section 603(b) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 because the office of Director of the Bureau of the Budget was redesignated the Director of the Office of Management and Budget by section 102(b) of Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1970 (84 Stat. 2085). Section 102 of Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1970, was repealed by section 5(b) of the Act of September 13, 1982 (Public Law 97–258, 96 Stat. 1085), the first section of which enacted Title 31, United States Code, but the successor provision, 31:502, continued the designation as Director of the Office of Management and Budget.
### §18101. Definitions

In this chapter—

(1) Federal agency.—The term "federal agency" has the same meaning given that term in section 102 of this title.

(2) TTY.—The term "TTY" means a text-telephone used in the transmission of coded signals through the nationwide telecommunications system.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1290.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 18101 | 40:762. | Pub. L. 100–542, §2, Oct. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 2721. |

Section
olo

gy 

and

 Co

des

olo

gy 

and

 Co

des Group 1Group 1

Conditions & Specifications:

• Concrete slab in Arizona

• 6-in thick

• Exposed to moisture 

• Specified strength of 4000 psi at 28 days

• Slump of 4 in 1 in

Co

ncr

ete 

Tech

no

Co

ncr

ete 

Tech

no • Slump of 4 in. 1 in.

• No statistical data available

Coarse Aggregate:

• Smooth and rounded gravel

• 3/4 -in. nominal maximum size

• S.G. = 2.68 (SSD)

• Dry-rodded bulk density = 2789.1 lb/yd3 (103.3 lb/ft3)

• Absorption, abs = 1.2%

• Moisture content, mc = _________%

Fine Aggregate (Sand):

• Manufactured Sand

• S.G. = 2.64 (SSD)

• Fineness modulus, FM = 2.85

• Absorption, abs = 0.8%

• Moisture content, mc = _________%

Admixtures:

None

olo

gy 

and

 Co

des

olo

gy 

and

 Co

des Group 2Group 2

Conditions & Specifications:

• Concrete footing for 200 ft tall containment structure

• Specified strength of 3000 psi at 28 days

• Slump of 3 in. 1 in.

• No statistical data available

Co

ncr

ete 

Tech

no

Co

ncr

ete 

Tech

no

Coarse Aggregate:

• Smooth and rounded gravel

• 3/4 -in. nominal maximum size

• S.G. = 2.68 (SSD)

• Dry-rodded bulk density = 2789.1 lb/yd3 (103.3 lb/ft3)

• Absorption, abs = 1.2%

• Moisture content, mc = _________%

Fine Aggregate (Sand):

• Manufactured Sand

• S.G. = 2.64 (SSD)

• Fineness modulus, FM = 2.85

• Absorption, abs = 0.8%

• Moisture content, mc = _________%

Admixtures:

None

olo

gy 

and

 Co

des

olo

gy 

and

 Co

des Group 3Group 3

Conditions & Specifications:

• Concrete is to be used for cooling towers in Maryland 

• Exposed to moderate chlorides and sulfates from sea-water environment

• Specified strength of 4000 psi at 28 days

• Slump of 5 in. 1 in.

Co

ncr

ete 

Tech

no

Co

ncr

ete 

Tech

no • No statistical data available

Coarse Aggregate:

• Smooth and rounded gravel

• 3/4 -in. nominal maximum size

• S.G. = 2.68 (SSD)

• Dry-rodded bulk density = 2789.1 lb/yd3 (103.3 lb/ft3)

• Absorption, abs = 1.2%

• Moisture content, mc = _________%

Fine Aggregate (Sand):

• Manufactured Sand

• S.G. = 2.64 (SSD)

• Fineness modulus, FM = 2.85

• Absorption, abs = 0.8%

• Moisture content, mc = _________%

Admixtures:

None

olo

gy 

and

 Co

des

olo

gy 

and

 Co

des Group 4Group 4

Conditions & Specifications:

• Concrete to be used for an intake structure in a fresh water reservoir in Southern California

• Exposed to severe sulfates from soils

• Specified strength of 5000 psi at 28 days

• Slump of 3 in. 1 in.

Co

ncr

ete 

Tech

no

Co

ncr

ete 

Tech

no Slump of 3 in. 1 in.

• No statistical data available

Coarse Aggregate:

• Smooth and rounded gravel

• 3/4 -in. nominal maximum size

• S.G. = 2.68 (SSD)

• Dry-rodded bulk density = 2789.1 lb/yd3 (103.3 lb/ft3)

• Absorption, abs = 1.2%

• Moisture content, mc = _________%

Fine Aggregate (Sand):

• Manufactured Sand

• S.G. = 2.64 (SSD)

• Fineness modulus, FM = 2.85

• Absorption, abs = 0.8%

• Moisture content, mc = _________%

Admixtures:

None
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region III

2443 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. III-12-039

Contact: Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil (630) 829-9663

October 25, 2012

E-Mail: OPA3 @nrc.gov 

NRC SCHEDULES NOVEMBER 1 MEETING TO DISCUSS OVERSIGHT OF 

ZION NUCLEAR POWER PLANT AND DECOMMISSIONING

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a public meeting on Thursday, Nov.

1, to discuss the agency’s actions to ensure the safe decommissioning of the Zion Nuclear Power 

Station. The two-unit plant, located in Zion, Ill., is approximately 40 miles north of Chicago, 

and ceased operation in 1997.

Decommissioning activities at the plant are being carried out by ZionSolutions, a 

subsidiary of EnergySolutions created to manage the decommissioning work at Zion and based 

in Salt Lake city, Utah.

The meeting will be held at 6 p.m. CDT in the Illinois Beach Resort and Conference 

Center, One Lake Front Drive, in Zion. The public is encouraged to participate in the meeting, 

which is tailored to provide members of the public with an opportunity to have a dialogue with 

NRC representatives. NRC staff will also be available for questions and discussion after the 

meeting.

During the Nov. 1 meeting, NRC staff will discuss its roles and oversight of the 

decommissioning project. The NRC will also address issues of concern, such as how people can 

have confidence that spent nuclear fuel at Zion will be stored safely and how NRC’s oversight 

processes assure that the site is decontaminated to levels that permit release of the property and 

termination of the NRC license.

Zion Unit 1 operated from 1973 to 1997; Unit 2 operated from 1974 to 1996. After a 

nuclear plant is permanently shut down, the NRC requires decommissioning to take place within 

60 years of the shut down date. In 2008, plant owner Exelon Corp. submitted a request to the 

NRC to transfer licensed ownership to ZionSolutions. The NRC reviewed the license transfer 
request, making sure that the company had proper staffing and expertise to safely implement 

decommissioning activities and that there would be sufficient funds to fully decommission the 

plant. The NRC approved the license transfer Sep. 2010. 

# # #

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand.

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.
### SUBCHAPTER V—OPERATION OF BUILDINGS AND RELATED ACTIVITIES
#### § 970.517 Diligence requirements.

The terms, conditions and restrictions in each exploration license must include provisions to assure diligent development. The Administrator will establish these pursuant to § 970.602.
407 P.2d 54

#### Quint T. EVANS, Western Auto Transport, Inc., a corporation, and Transport Indemnity Co., a corporation, Petitioners, v. Honorable Samuel Z. MONTOYA, Judge of the First Judicial District in and for the County of Santa Fe, Respondent.

No. 7986.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Nov. 3, 1965.

Ordered that the alternative writ of mandamus heretofore issued herein on September 30, 1965, be and the same is hereby made permanent.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 222 (Thursday, November 18, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 67545]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25677]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, December 17, 2004.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean A. Webb, (202) 418-5100.

Catherine D. Daniels,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 04-25677 Filed 11-16-04; 10:29 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
**GAO-02-848**                      Published: Jul 30, 2002. Publicly Released: Jul 30, 2002.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Status of FY22 Projects 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

This report provides a status of the Internal Revenue Service's (IRS) efforts to implement recommendations GAO made on its audits of IRS's financial statements. In updating the status of these recommendations, GAO included the results of its audit of IRS's financial statements for fiscal year 2001 and 2000.

## Full Report

Full Report (42 pages)

Accessible Text 

## Office of Public Affairs

### Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

### Public Inquiries

Public Affairs
PublicAffairs@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

Auditing and Financial Management

Audit reportsFinancial statement auditsFinancial auditFinancial managementInternal controlsAccounting proceduresData errorsCost accountingFinancial statementsFinancial systems
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 20, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41799 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus TOMAS LOPEZ-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:03-po-3282-1

-------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Tomas Lopez-Rodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Lopez-Rodriguez has not filed a response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH C IR . R. 42.2.
### SUBCHAPTER VI—COAL
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 16, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Consortium for Advanced Manufacturing-International (“CAM-I”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: Consortium for Advanced Manufacturing-International, Fort Worth, TX. The nature and scope of CAM-I's standards development activities are: To focus on information preparation for computer aided/integrated manufacturing systems and methods related to standards software input/output, interfaces, and language specifications.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-25860  Filed 11-19-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
### Part A—Individual Responsibility
#### § 930.120 Objectives.

This subpart sets forth the procedures by which the Secretary may find that a federal license or permit activity, including those described in detail in an OCS plan, or a federal assistance activity, which a State agency has found to be inconsistent with the enforceable policies of the management program, may be federally approved because the activity is consistent with the objectives or purposes of the Act, or is necessary in the interest of national security.
#### Amanda Renaut, Plaintiff, v. The City of New York, Appellant, Impleaded with Gustav Grossman and Another, Defendants. William F. Schneider, as County Clerk of New York County, Respondent.

Order affirmed. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6181
ROBERT WATSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MICHAEL MOORE; GERALDINE MIRO; MR. NICHOLS; MS. ROSS; MS. JOHNSON; JOHN SHU; D. L. SMITH; MR. COHEN; FRED BROWN; SERGEANT JOHNSON; CAPTAIN ALBRITTON, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofSouth Carolina, at Florence. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA96-3371-4-19BE) Submitted: May 1, 1997 Decided: May 8, 1997 Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Watson, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra J. Senn, STUCKEY & SENN, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order, which dismissed all Defendants except one and ordered service of complaint on the remaining Defendant. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdictionbecause the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Search For Partners,  December 7, 1998     

----

          The Business Information Service for the Newly Independent States (BISNIS) is the U.S.     government's clearinghouse for trade and investment information on the Newly     Independent States of the former Soviet Union.  BISNIS publishes SEARCH FORPARTNERS to help U.S. companies find     investment opportunities in the expanding markets of the former Soviet Union.
       SEARCH FOR PARTNERS is distributed via biweekly e-mail broadcast with a     limited selection of all leads published in this monthly newsletter.  Previous e-mail     broadcasts are available through the BISNIS home page, at:     http://www.mac.doc.gov/bisnis.  To receive the biweekly report, e-mail BISNIS at     [email protected] or call (202) 482-4655.
       These opportunities are provided solely as an informational service and do not     represent an endorsement by the U.S. Department of Commerce.  Verification of these     leads is the responsibility of the reader.
          Index of Investment Opportunities:
§ 16.8 Termination of participation. ( a ) The Secretary upon finding that a participant is not complying with the conditions set out in these procedures or in a Specification may terminate upon 30 days notice the participant's right to continue his participation in the program: *Provided,* That the participant shall first by given an opportunity to show cause why the participation should not be terminated.
( b ) Upon receipt of a notice from the Secretary of the proposed termination, which notice shall set forth the reasons for such proposed termination, the participant shall have thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of such notification to request a hearing under the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 556. The Secretary's proposed termination shall become final through the issuance of a written decision to the participant in the event such participant does not appeal the proposed termination within the thirty (30) day period. If, however, the participant requests a hearing within the thirty (30) day period, the Secretary's proposed termination shall be stayed pending the outcome of the hearing held pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 556.
( c ) A participant may at any time terminate his participation and responsibilities under this program with regard to a specific type of product by giving written notice to the Secretary that he has discontinued use of the Department of Commerce Label and Mark for all consumer products of the type involved.
### SUBCHAPTER III—EXPLORATION INITIATIVE
NRC ASSIGNS NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR 

TO SUSQUEHANNA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 

 Jonathan Greives has been selected as the new Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission resident inspector at the Susquehanna Steam 

Electric Station in Berwick, Pa. He joins NRC Senior Resident 

Inspector Pat Finney at the two-unit site, operated by PPL. 

 “Jon Greives’ experience, training and commitment to safety 

will help the NRC in its mission of protecting people and the 

environment by helping ensure that Susquehanna continues to meet the 

high standards set by the agency,” acting NRC Region I Administrator Marc L. Dapas said. 

 Greives joined the NRC in June 2009 after serving seven years in the United States 

Navy’s nuclear power program. During his naval service, he was a staff instructor at the Naval 

Nuclear Power Training Command and served aboard the USS Wyoming, a nuclear submarine. 

He is now a lieutenant in the Navy Reserve. 

 Greives is a graduate of Bucknell University where he earned a bachelor’s degree in 

electrical engineering. He also completed the Navy’s nuclear power training program and a 

rigorous NRC inspector qualification program. 

 Each U.S. commercial nuclear plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They serve 

as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major work 

projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. 

 The Susquehanna resident inspectors can be reached at (570) 542-2134. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region I 

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406 

E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. I-10-041 

Contact: Diane Screnci 610/337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan 610/337-5331 

September 8, 2010

Email: OPA1.RESOURCE@nrc.gov