alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 25 (Friday, February 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 5865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2606]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-52,412]


Lear Corporation, SSD Division, Elsie, MI; Dismissal of 
Application for Reconsideration

    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative 
reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance for workers at Lear Corporation, SSD Division, 
Elsie, Michigan. The application contained no new substantial 
information which would bear importantly on the Department's 
determination. Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued.

TA-W-52,412; Lear Corporation, SSD Division Elsie, Michigan 
(December 16, 2003)

    Signed at Washington, DC this 27th day of January 2004.
Timothy Sullivan,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-2606 Filed 2-5-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
§ 351.601 Order of release from competitive level. ( a ) Each agency must select competing employees for release from a competitive level (including release from a competitive level involving a pay band) under this part in the inverse order of retention standing, beginning with the employee with the lowest retention standing on the retention register. An agency may not release a competing employee from a competitive level while retaining in that level an employee with lower retention standing except: ( 1 ) As required under § 351.606 when an employee is retained under a mandatory exception or under § 351.806 when an employee is entitled to a new written notice of reduction in force; or
( 2 ) As permitted under § 351.607 when an employee is retained under a permissive continuing exception or under § 351.608 when an employee is retained under a permissive temporary exception.
( b ) At its option an agency may provide for intervening displacement within the competitive level before final release of the employee with the lowest-retention standing from the competitive level.
( c ) When employees in the same retention subgroup have identical service dates and are tied for release from a competitive level, the agency may select any tied employee for release.
[73 FR 29388, May 21, 2008]
#### § 740.4 Shipments to Country Group B countries (GBS).

License Exception GBS authorizes exports and reexports to Country Group B (see Supplement No. 1 to part 740), except Sudan and Ukraine, of those commodities where the Commerce Country Chart (Supplement No. 1 to part 738 of the EAR) indicates a license requirement to the ultimate destination for national security reasons only and identified by “GBS—Yes” on the CCL. See § 743.1 of the EAR for reporting requirements for exports of certain commodities under License Exception GBS.

[86 FR 4933, Jan. 19, 2021]
# L_2019062EN.01001601.xml

| 1.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 62/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 62/16

---

DECISION No 3/JP/2018

of 25 January 2019

of the Joint Committee set up under the Agreement on Mutual Recognition between the European Community and Japan related to the registration of Conformity Assessment Bodies under the Sectoral Annex on Telecommunications Terminal Equipment and Radio Equipment [2019/347]

THE JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on Mutual Recognition between the European Community and Japan and in particular Article 8(3)(a) and 9(1)(b) thereof;

Whereas the Joint Committee is to take a decision to list a Conformity Assessment Body or Bodies under a Sectoral Annex;

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

| 1. | The Conformity Assessment Body indicated below is registered under the Sectoral Annex on Telecommunications Terminal Equipment and Radio Equipment of the Agreement, for the products and conformity assessment procedures as indicated below.





  Name, acronym and contact details of the Conformity Assessment Body:
  Name: CETECOM GmbH
  Address: Im Teelbruch 116, D-45219 Essen, GERMANY

  Telephone number: +49 2054 9519 404
  Fax number: +49 2054 9519 150
  E-mail address: francis.lima@cetecom.com
  URL address: http://www.cetecom.com
  Contact person of the designated CAB: Francis Lima |
| --- | --- |

1.

Name, acronym and contact details of the Conformity Assessment Body:

Name: CETECOM GmbH

Address: Im Teelbruch 116, D-45219 Essen, GERMANY

Telephone number: +49 2054 9519 404

Fax number: +49 2054 9519 150

E-mail address: francis.lima@cetecom.com

URL address: http://www.cetecom.com

Contact person of the designated CAB: Francis Lima

| Scope of registration in terms of products and conformity assessment procedures:
  For Radio Law:
  Specified Radio Equipment specified in Article 38-2-2, paragraph (1), items i), ii), iii) of the Radio Law |
| --- |

Scope of registration in terms of products and conformity assessment procedures:

For Radio Law:

Specified Radio Equipment specified in Article 38-2-2, paragraph (1), items i), ii), iii) of the Radio Law

| 2. | This decision, done in duplicate, shall be signed by the Co-Chairs. The decision shall be effective from the date of the later of these signatures. |
| --- | --- |

2.

On behalf of Japan

Kyoichiro KAWAKAMI

Signed in Tokyo on 25 January 2019

On behalf of the European Union

Ignacio IRUARRIZAGA

Signed in Brussels on 16 January 2019

---
# Službeni list C 366A/30.

| | ISSN 1977-1088 |
| --- | --- |
| Službeni list
  Europske unije | C 366A |
| | |
| Hrvatsko izdanje | Informacije i objave | Godište 63.30. listopada 2020. |

ISSN 1977-1088

Službeni list

Europske unije

C 366A

Hrvatsko izdanje

Informacije i objave

Godište 63.30. listopada 2020.

---

| Sadržaj | Stranica |
| --- | --- |
| | Ispravci |
| 2020/C 366 A/01 | Ispravak Oglasa za slobodno radno mjesto CONS/AD/162/20 ( SL C 358 A, 26.10.2020. ) | 1 |

Sadržaj

Stranica

Ispravci

2020/C 366 A/01

Ispravak Oglasa za slobodno radno mjesto CONS/AD/162/20 ( SL C 358 A, 26.10.2020. )

( SL C 358 A, 26.10.2020. )

1

---

| HR | |
| --- | --- |

HR

---

Ispravci

| 30.10.2020 | HR | Službeni list Europske unije | CA 366/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2020

HR

Službeni list Europske unije

CA 366/1

---

Ispravak Oglasa za slobodno radno mjesto CONS/AD/162/20

(
  Službeni list Europske unije C 358 A od 26. listopada 2020.
  )

(2020/C 366 A/01)

Na stranici 1., u odjeljku „OPĆE INFORMACIJE”, u tablici, pod „Služba”:

| umjesto: | „GU RELEX: Vanjski poslovi, proširenje i civilna zaštita”; |
| --- | --- |

umjesto:

„GU RELEX: Vanjski poslovi, proširenje i civilna zaštita”;

| treba stajati: | „GU RELEX: Vanjski odnosi”. |
| --- | --- |

treba stajati:

treba stajati:

„GU RELEX: Vanjski odnosi”.

Na stranici 1., u odjeljku „O nama”, u drugom odlomku:

| umjesto: | „Glavna uprava „Vanjski poslovi, proširenje i civilna zaštita” (GU RELEX) trenutačno obuhvaća dvije uprave: RELEX.1 bavi se trgovinom, razvojem, sigurnošću i koordinacijom, a RELEX.2 bavi se proširenjem, Bliskim istokom i Sjevernom Afrikom te civilnom zaštitom.”; |
| --- | --- |

umjesto:

umjesto:

„Glavna uprava „Vanjski poslovi, proširenje i civilna zaštita” (GU RELEX) trenutačno obuhvaća dvije uprave: RELEX.1 bavi se trgovinom, razvojem, sigurnošću i koordinacijom, a RELEX.2 bavi se proširenjem, Bliskim istokom i Sjevernom Afrikom te civilnom zaštitom.”;

| treba stajati: | „Glavna uprava „Vanjski odnosi” (GU RELEX) trenutačno obuhvaća dvije uprave: RELEX.1 bavi se trgovinom, razvojem i sigurnošću, a RELEX.2 bavi se politikom susjedstva i odgovorom na krize.” |
| --- | --- |

treba stajati:

treba stajati:

„Glavna uprava „Vanjski odnosi” (GU RELEX) trenutačno obuhvaća dvije uprave: RELEX.1 bavi se trgovinom, razvojem i sigurnošću, a RELEX.2 bavi se politikom susjedstva i odgovorom na krize.”

---
### §9101. Establishment, composition, and vacancies

(a) Establishment.—There is a Commission of Fine Arts.

(b) Composition.—The Commission is composed of seven well-qualified judges of the fine arts, appointed by the President, who serve for four years each or until their successors are appointed and qualified.

(c) Vacancies.—The President shall fill vacancies on the Commission.

(d) Expenses.—Members of the Commission shall be paid actual expenses in traveling to and from the District of Columbia to attend Commission meetings and while attending those meetings.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1232.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 9101(a), (b) | 40:104 (1st sentence). | May 17, 1910, ch. 243, §1 (1st, 2d sentences, last sentence words after comma), 36 Stat. 371. |
| 9101(c) | 40:104 (2d sentence). | |
| 9101(d) | 40:104 (last sentence words after comma). | |

Section

In subsection (a), the word "permanent" is omitted as obsolete.

In subsection (d), the words "the District of Columbia" are substituted for "Washington" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code.
1

In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS 

No. 17-1655V 

 Filed: September 21, 2018 

UNPUBLISHED 

KATIE REAVES, 

 Petitioner, 

v. 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, 

 Respondent. 

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; 

Causation-In-Fact; Influenza (Flu) 

Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to 

Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) 

   

Jessica Anne Olins, Maglio Christopher and Toale, PA, Washington, DC, for petitioner. 

Traci R. Patton, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. 

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master: 

 On November 1, 2017, Katie Reaves (“petitioner”) filed a petition for 

compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. 

§300aa-10, et seq.,

2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that her receipt of an 

influenza (“flu”) vaccine on October 5, 2016, caused her to suffer a left-sided shoulder 

injury to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”). Petition at 1-2. The case was assigned to 

the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. 

On September 21, 2018, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he 

concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 

4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent states that “petitioner suffered bursitis in her 

left shoulder, and that it was caused-in-fact by the flu vaccine she received on October 

                                                            

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the 

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with 

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits 

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012). 
2

5, 2016.” Id. at 3. Respondent further agrees that “the records show that petitioner 

suffered the sequelae of her injury for more than six months” and that “petitioner has 

met the statutory requirements for compensation.” Id.

 In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the 

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Chief Special Master
Exhibit 32.2

                 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of BidGive International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Thomas W. Richardson, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


      (1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


      (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.




/s/ Thomas W. Richardson

Thomas W. Richardson

Chief Financial Officer



Date: April 12, 2005
### §3708. Criminal penalties

A contractor or subcontractor having a duty to employ, direct, or control a laborer or mechanic employed in the performance of work contemplated by a contract to which this chapter applies that intentionally violates this chapter shall be fined under title 18, imprisoned for not more than six months, or both.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1174.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3708 | 40:332. | Pub. L. 87–581, title I, §106, Aug. 13, 1962, 76 Stat. 359. |

Section

The words "shall be fined under title 18" are substituted for "shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and for each and every such offense shall, upon conviction, be punished by a fine of not to exceed $1,000" for consistency with chapter 227 of title 18. The words "in the discretion of the court having jurisdiction thereof" are omitted as unnecessary.
**GAO-02-933R**                      Published: Aug 01, 2002. Publicly Released: Aug 01, 2002.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Status of FY22 Projects 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

The Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990 requires each federal agency to issue a regulation adjusting its covered maximum civil monetary penalties for inflation by October 23, 1996, and requires them to make necessary adjustments at least once every 4 years thereafter. The Food and Drug Administration's Office of the Chief Counsel indicated that at least 14 of the agency's civil penalties are covered by the act, but the agency had not adjusted any of them for inflation.

## Recommendations

## Recommendations for Executive Action

## Full Report

Full Report (4 pages)

## GAO Contacts

### 

J. Christopher Mihm
mihmj@gao.gov

(202) 512-6806

## Office of Public Affairs

### Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

### Public Inquiries

Public Affairs
PublicAffairs@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

Government Operations

Fines (penalties)InflationNoncomplianceFederal lawPrice inflationFood qualityMammographyQuality standardsFederal rulemakingFederal agencies
KENNETH E HAMMETT,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-2099

_____________________________/

Opinion filed September 20, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Columbia County.

Wesley R. Douglas, Judge.

Kenneth E Hammett, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B. L. THOMAS, ROWE, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00175-CV

In the Interest of Z.B., A Child §

§

§

§

From the 323rd District Court

of Tarrant County (323-98709J-13)

October 23, 2014

Opinion by Justice Gardner

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there was no 

error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By __/s/ Anne Gardner___________

 Justice Anne Gardner
### §8525. Court actions

If necessary to obtain such assets the Secretary, through the Secretary's authorized attorneys, may bring and prosecute appropriate actions at law or other legal proceedings, the costs and expenses thereof to be paid as are other administrative expenses of the Department.

(Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1261, §5225; Pub. L. 99–576, title VII, §701(104), Oct. 28, 1986, 100 Stat. 3301; renumbered §8525, Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §402(b)(1), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 238; Pub. L. 102–83, §4(a)(3), (4), (b)(1), (2)(E), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 404, 405.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–40 renumbered section 5225 of this title as this section.

Pub. L. 102–83 substituted "Secretary" for "Administrator", "Secretary's" for "Administrator's", and "Department" for "Veterans' Administration".

1986—Pub. L. 99–576 substituted "the Administrator's" for "his".
#### § 285.6 Application for accreditation.

A laboratory may apply for accreditation in any of the established LAPs. The applicant laboratory shall provide a completed application to NVLAP, pay all required fees and agree to certain conditions as set forth in the NVLAP Application for Accreditation, and provide management system documentation to NVLAP (or a designated NVLAP assessor) prior to the assessment process.

[85 FR 60060, Sept. 24, 2020]
SERVED: March 27, 2013 ,...., ___ ·:-~,-- r---

; • ' j i ~ ,' • -f'.j I ! ';-

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONJ-;> ;;·.£..:-:::· i ' ' ~ '"',.. - - OFFICE OF HEARINGS .. · '··; . _,...,j :·,, ;'~: 

WASHINGTON, DC --,,] '"n 1 _ I ; l.. '.I l 1 ;. _) 2: 3 8 

In The Matter Of: 

HELOAIR, INC. 

Respondent 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. FAA-2012-0472 

Case No. 2011-EA-210018 

ORDER DISMISSING PROCEEDING 

On March 14, 2013, a Notice of Hearing Location was filed. 

On March 27,2013, the FAA filed a Withdrawal of Complaint stating that the parties had 

reached a settlement. 

After reviewing all relevant caselaw, decisions, regulations, statutory authority, and being 

fully advised; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. The Pre-Hearing Status Conference set for Thursday, March28, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. 

Eastern time is cancelled. 

2. The Hearing set to begin on April17, 2013, at the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in 

Richmond, VA is cancelled. 

3. Pursuant to 14 C.P.R.§ 13.215, the FAA has withdrawn its Complaint, and this 

proceeding is dismissed with prejudice. 

ivan 

nistrative Law Judge 

Attachment: Service List 
•' 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0472 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL and FAX 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Zachery M. Berman, Esq. 

Complainant's Counsel 

Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AEA-7 

Eastern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3258 

FAX: 718-995-5699 

John G. Butler, III, Esq. 

Respondent's Counsel 

SANDS ANDERSON PC 

Bank of America Center 

1111 East Main Street, Suite 2400 

Richmond VA 23219 

TEL: 804-648-1636 

FAX: 804-783-7291 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

US. Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAJ(: 202-366-7536 

ONE COPY 

Whit Baldwin, President 

Heloair, Inc., Respondent 

5721 Gulfstream Road 

Richmond, VA 23250 

1 For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 

600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: 

Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
No: IV-13-035 November 13, 2013

CONTACT: Victor Dricks (817) 200-1128

 Lara Uselding (817) 100-1519

NRC Issues $7,000 Fine to Southwest X-Ray Corp.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has proposed fining Southwest X-Ray Corp. of Glenrock, 

Wyo., $7,000 for two violations of NRC regulations. The company uses radiography cameras to 

photograph pipe welds.

The violations involve the company’s failure to ensure that a qualified radiographer accompany 

and supervise a radiographer’s assistant while conducting radiographic operations. The violations were 

caused by a lack of communication between a radiographer and his assistant when the radiographer left 

a shop to answer a telephone call while operations were still being performed by the assistant. The 

radiographer’s assistant told NRC he thought the radiographer was still in the area, and the 

radiographer said he thought the assistant knew he had left the area.

The violations were identified by an NRC inspector on July 8, during an unannounced 

inspection of the company’s facility in Casper, Wyo.

An enforcement conference was held on Sept 12, 2013 during which company officials 

provided NRC staff with additional information. The NRC staff has decided that a civil penalty is 

appropriate for the two violations because comprehensive corrective actions taken by the company have 

not been completed.

Copies of the enforcement action will be posted on the NRC web site. The results of the NRC 

inspection can be found in ADAMS under Accession ML 13233A167.

The company has 30 days in which to appeal the decision, or 10 days to request alternate 

dispute resolution, using a neutral third-party mediator.
### SUBCHAPTER IX—EDUCATION
### SUBCHAPTER XV—UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYEES