alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §452. Counseling and mediation

(a) In General.—The President, or the designee of the President, shall by regulation establish procedures substantially similar to those under sections 402 and 403 of the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 for the counseling and mediation of alleged violations of a law made applicable under part A of subchapter II.

(b) Exhaustion Requirement.—A covered employee who has not exhausted counseling and mediation under subsection (a) shall be ineligible to make any election under section 453 or otherwise pursue any further form of relief under this subchapter.

(Added Pub. L. 104–331, §2(a), Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4067.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Sections 402 and 403 of the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995, referred to in subsec. (a), are classified to sections 1402 and 1403, respectively, of Title 2, The Congress.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1997, except that subsec. (a) of this section effective Oct. 26, 1996, see section 471 of this title.
### [§3538. Vacant]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Prior to renumbering of sections 1700 to 1766 of this chapter as sections 3500 to 3566 by Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 406, section 1738 of this chapter, added Pub. L. 95–202, title II, §201(b), Nov. 23, 1977, 91 Stat. 1437, which related to accelerated payment of educational assistance allowances, was repealed by Pub. L. 100–689, title I, §124(a), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4174.
### §1102. Special provisions relating to surviving spouses

(a) No compensation shall be paid to the surviving spouse of a veteran under this chapter unless such surviving spouse was married to such veteran—

(1) before the expiration of fifteen years after the termination of the period of service in which the injury or disease causing the death of the veteran was incurred or aggravated; or

(2) for one year or more; or

(3) for any period of time if a child was born of the marriage, or was born to them before the marriage.

(b) Subsection (a) shall not be applicable to any surviving spouse who, with respect to date of marriage, could have qualified as a surviving spouse for death compensation under any law administered by the Secretary in effect on December 31, 1957.

(Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1119, §302; Pub. L. 86–491, June 8, 1960, 74 Stat. 161; Pub. L. 90–77, title I, §101(a), Aug. 31, 1967, 81 Stat. 178; Pub. L. 94–433, title IV, §404(2)–(4), Sept. 30, 1976, 90 Stat. 1378; renumbered §1102 and amended Pub. L. 102–83, §§4(a)(1), 5(a), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 403, 406.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), renumbered section 302 of this title as this section.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 102–83, §4(a)(1), substituted "administered by the Secretary" for "administered by the Veterans' Administration".

1976—Pub. L. 94–433, §404(4), substituted "surviving spouses" for "widows" in section catchline.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 94–433, §404(2), substituted "surviving spouse of a veteran under this chapter unless such surviving spouse was married to such veteran" for "widow of a veteran under this chapter unless she was married to him".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 94–433, §404(3), substituted "surviving spouse" for "widow" in two places.

1967—Subsec. (a)(2), (3). Pub. L. 90–77 qualified widow of a veteran for receipt of compensation by reducing in par. (2) the requisite marriage period from five years to one year and by making her eligible for benefits in par. (3) in event of antenuptial birth.

1960—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 86–491 substituted "fifteen years" for "ten years".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1976 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 94–433 effective Oct. 1, 1976, see section 406 of Pub. L. 94–433, set out as a note under section 1101 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1967 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 90–77 effective first day of first calendar month which begins more than ten days after Aug. 31, 1967, see section 405 of Pub. L. 90–77, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
WebEx Communications, Inc.:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-47892) on From S-8 of WebEx Communications, Inc. of our report dated
February 2, 2001, except as to Note 8 which is as of March 29, 2001, relating to
the consolidated balance sheets of WebEx Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and comprehensive loss, and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2000,
and the related schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2000, annual
report on Form 10-K of WebEx, Communications, Inc.


/s/ KPMG LLP

Mountain View, California
March 29, 2001
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 170 (Thursday, September 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 54467]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-22378]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES

Economic Impact Policy

    This notice is to inform the public that the Export-Import Bank of 
the United States has received an application for a $25.1 million 
guarantee to support the U.S. export of aircraft tooling equipment to 
Mexico and the United Kingdom. The U.S. exports will enable the Mexican 
and British facilities to produce composite aircraft parts. All of the 
new Mexican and British production will be sent back to the U.S. for 
final assembly into business aircraft. Available information indicates 
that this type of supply chain structure exists because of the need for 
industry participants to produce technically specific goods at 
proprietary facilities. Interested parties may submit comments on this 
transaction by e-mail to economic.impact@exim.gov or by mail to 811 
Vermont Avenue, NW., Room 947, Washington, DC 20571, within 14 days of 
the date this notice appears in the Federal Register.

John F. Simonson,
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-22378 Filed 8-31-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
### Part D—Evidence-Based Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Services

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 114–144, §4(j)(1), Apr. 19, 2016, 130 Stat. 340, inserted "Evidence-Based" before "Disease" in part heading.

Pub. L. 106–501, title III, §314(2), Nov. 13, 2000, 114 Stat. 2253, redesignated part F of this subchapter as part D.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior part D, consisting of sections 3030h to 3030k of this title, related to in-home services for frail older individuals, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 106–501, title III, §314(1), Nov. 13, 2000, 114 Stat. 2253. See prior provisions notes under section 3030g–22 of this title.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 14, 2014

No. 04-14-00194-CV

DTND SIERRA INVESTMENTS, LLC,

Appellant

v.

COMPASS BANK,

Appellee

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-18326

Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Appellant's request for oral argument is hereby DENIED.

It is so ORDERED on November 14, 2014.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ___________________________________

 Keith E. Hottle

 Clerk of Court
#### In the Matter of J. P. Stevens & Co., Inc., Appellant. Edward Corsi, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board. On January 21, 1952, the Utica and Mohawk Cotton Mills, Inc., which had been engaged in manufacturing, sold all its assets in New York State to J. P. Stevens & Co., Inc. The seller intended to discontinue all its New York business and the buyer did not intend to continue that business, but merely to acquire assets. There remained, however, a program of discontinuance of Utica’s operations and winding up its manufacturing comnitments. The proof is that at the time of transfer of assets by Utica “all of its New York operations Had not been completely discontinued ” and *“*the services of all of its employees had not been terminated.” It also was established that Stevens “ continued with this program ”. While all manufacturing operations had ceased by February 2, 1952, some work in connection with Utica’s business continued into March. The statute, Unemployment Insurance Law (Labor Law, art. 18, § '581, subd. 4) provides that where an employer transfers his “organization, trade or business in whole or in part” the transferee shall take over and continue the transferor’s employer’s account under the Unemployment Insurance Law *“*including its balance and all other aspects of its experience”. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board has held, *977affirming a referee, that Stevens by the acts accompanying the transfer of Utica’s assets, also took over Utica’s unemployment insurance account, and that the rate of Stevens which was adversely affected by the combining of the two accounts, was properly fixed under the statute. Some of the employees of Utica, whose claims tend to affect the balance in Utica’s account and hence Stevens’ rate under the accounts as combined, were separated by Utica before the transfer of assets and some were separated by Stevens after that time. If the account is deemed transferred, however, and assumed by the transferee, both classes of employees are chargeable to Stevens’ account, since the whole of the Utica balance, unsegregated as to particular classes of employees, is transferred. We think there was a transfer of “organization, trade or business ” with the transfer of assets. It was the “ business ” of Utica to carry out the program of continuing to execute its manufacturing commitments until they were complete; it was part of its “ trade ” to do this; and the employees of Utica who continued to February 2d and the few who continued on after this were, in part, Utica’s “ organization ”, In becoming a transferee of these activities and instrumentalities as well as of assets, Stevens also became a transferee, we think, of the Utica unemployment insurance employer’s account. Decision unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent. Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpem and Imrie, JJ.
1 

# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 17-1655V Filed: September 21, 2018

UNPUBLISHED

KATIE REAVES,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Special Processing Unit (SPU); Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; Causation-In-Fact; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

Jessica Anne Olins, Maglio Christopher and T oale, PA, Washington, DC, for petitioner.
Traci R. Patton, U.S. D epartment of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Dorsey , Chief Special Master:

On November 1, 2017, Katie Reaves (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Inju ry Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.

, 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that her receipt of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on October 5, 2016, caused her to suffer a left-sided shoulder injury to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”). Petition at 1-2. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On September 21, 2018, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that petitioner is entitled to comp ensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent states that “petitioner suffered bursitis in her left shoulder, and that it was caused-in-fac t by the flu vaccine she received on October

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reaso ned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Cour t of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other inform ation, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, t he undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Ac t will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).2 5, 2016.” Id. at 3. Respondent further agrees that “the records show that petitioner suffered the sequelae of her in jury for more than six mont hs” and that “petitioner has met the statutory requirem ents for compensation.” Id.

In view of respondent’s positio n and the evidence of record, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey
Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master
#### § 4601.108 Reporting waste, fraud, abuse, and corruption.

Employees shall disclose waste, fraud, abuse, and corruption to appropriate authorities, such as the DHS Office of Inspector General.
### **CHAPTER 101—MAGNETIC FUSION ENERGY ENGINEERING**

Sec.
9301.
Congressional findings and declaration of policy.
9302.
Definitions.
9303.
Program activities.
9304.
Comprehensive program management plan; submittal to Congressional committees.
9305.
Magnetic fusion engineering center.
9306.
Repealed.
9307.
Program advisory committees.
9308.
International cooperation; examination of impact on national magnetic fusion program; exploration of prospects for joint funding in construction of fusion engineering device; report to Congressional committees on results of examination and exploration.
9309.
Technical manpower requirements; report to President and Congress.
9310.
Dissemination of information.
9311.
Repealed.
9312.
Authorization of appropriations; contract authority.
### SUBCHAPTER XIV—MATCHING GRANT PROGRAM FOR SCHOOL SECURITY
DEPARTMENTOFTHEARMY 

HEADQUARTERS, U.S. ARMY AERONAUTICAL SERVICES AGENCY 

9325 GUNSTON ROAD, SUITE N319 

FORT BELVOIR, VA 22060-5582 

Office of the Director of Plans, Policy and Programs 

US Department ofTransportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Room W12-140 

Washington, DC 20590-0001 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Request an extension to Exemption Number 9835B (Regulatory Docket Number 

FAA-2002-13066) granted to the Department of the Army. This exemption from 

§91.209(a) (1) and (2) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) permits the 

United States Army to conduct certain military training operations at night without lighted 

aircraft position lights. The conditions under which the current exemption was granted 

remain in effect. 

For questions regarding this request, contact the U.S. Department of the Army 

Representative to FAA Headquarters, SFC Jerod Broten at (202) 267-9427 or 

jerod. broten@faa.gov. 

Sincerely, 

L. S. DIBBLE, DAC, GS-15 

Director of Plans, Policy and Programs
NRC NAMES NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Atlanta have selected 

Galen Smith as the senior resident inspector for the Tennessee Valley 

Authority’s Sequoyah nuclear power plant, located near Soddy-Daisy, Tenn., 

about 16 miles northeast of Chattanooga. Smith joins NRC Resident 

Inspector Wesley Deschaine. 

Smith has been the NRC senior resident inspector at the Nuclear Fuel 

Services facility in Erwin, Tenn., since 2009 and was the resident inspector at

NFS for three years before assuming that position.

Smith joined the NRC in 2001 as a project engineer in the Division of Reactor Projects in 

the NRC’s Region I in King of Prussia, Pa. From 2002-2006, he was the resident inspector at the 

Beaver Valley nuclear power station in Shippingport, Pa. 

He earned a bachelor of science in mechanical engineering from Duke University and a 

master’s degree in electrical engineering from the University of South Florida. His experience 

prior to joining the NRC included stints as an operations manager for Lucent Technologies, a 

control room supervisor at Florida Power & Light’s St. Lucie nuclear power plant and a nuclear 

submarine officer in the U.S. Navy. Smith is also a licensed professional engineer in Florida. 

“Galen Smith has the experience and sense of duty needed to carry out the NRC mission 

of protecting people and the environment by helping to ensure the safety of the Sequoyah plant,” 

said NRC Region II Administrator Victor McCree. 

At least two NRC resident inspectors are assigned to each operating U.S. commercial 

nuclear plant. They serve as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, 

monitoring major work projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. Resident 

inspectors can serve at a reactor site for up to seven years. 

The Sequoyah resident inspectors can be reached at 423-842-8001.

###

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No: II-13-004

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416 

 January 31, 2013

E-mail: OPA2.Resource@nrc.gov
News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES link on the 

NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's 

website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.
NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS 

TO DISCUSS JAPAN TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS AT FEB. 9-11 MEETING 

The Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) will hear presentations and 

hold discussions regarding the implementation of the Japan task force recommendations at a 

meeting on Feb. 9-11 at NRC headquarters in Rockville, Md. The Japan task force was chartered 

to undertake a review of NRC’s processes and regulations to determine if the Commission should 

make additional improvements in regulations, and to give recommendations for policy direction.

Further meeting location details and information are listed on the complete ACRS 

meeting agenda available on the NRC’s website.

The ACRS advises the Commission, independently from the NRC staff, on safety issues 

related to the licensing and operation of nuclear power plants, as well as issues in the areas of 

health physics and radiation protection. For more information on the ACRS, view an NRC video

presentation on YouTube or visit the NRC website.

###

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand.

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 12-012 February 6, 2012
###### Editorial Note on Part 8

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 8 appear at 68 FR 51352, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 8.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to effectuate the provisions of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (hereafter referred to as the “Act”) to the end that no person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department of Commerce. This part is consistent with achievement of the objectives of the statutes authorizing the financial assistance given by the Department of Commerce as provided in section 602 of the Act.
Case 1:09-cv-00089-CKK Document 25 Filed 02/04/10 Page 1 of 10Case 1:09-cv-00089-CKK Document 25 Filed 02/04/10 Page 2 of 10Case 1:09-cv-00089-CKK Document 25 Filed 02/04/10 Page 3 of 10Case 1:09-cv-00089-CKK Document 25 Filed 02/04/10 Page 4 of 10Case 1:09-cv-00089-CKK Document 25 Filed 02/04/10 Page 5 of 10Case 1:09-cv-00089-CKK Document 25 Filed 02/04/10 Page 6 of 10Case 1:09-cv-00089-CKK Document 25 Filed 02/04/10 Page 7 of 10Case 1:09-cv-00089-CKK Document 25 Filed 02/04/10 Page 8 of 10Case 1:09-cv-00089-CKK Document 25 Filed 02/04/10 Page 9 of 10Case 1:09-cv-00089-CKK Document 25 Filed 02/04/10 Page 10 of 10
#### § 930.83 Review of amended OCS plans; public notice.

After receipt of a copy of the amended OCS plan, consistency certification, and necessary data and information, State agency review shall begin. The requirements of §§ 930.77, 930.78, and 930.79, apply to the review of amended OCS plans, except that the applicable time period for purposes of concurrence by conclusive presumption shall be three months instead of six months.
NRC ANNOUNCES AVAILABILITY OF LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION

FOR LIMERICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission announced today that an application for a 20-year 

renewal of the operating licenses for the Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2, is available for 

public review. 

The Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2, are boiling-water nuclear reactors,

located in Limerick Township, Pa., about 21 miles from Philadelphia, and the current operating 

licenses for Units 1 and 2 expire on Oct. 26, 2024, and June 22, 2029, respectively.

The licensee, Exelon Generation Co., LLC, submitted the renewal application June 22. It is 

available in the NRC’s electronic documents systems, known as the Agencywide Documents 

Access and Management System (ADAMS) by searching for accession number ML111790800. 

Help in using ADAMS can be obtained via the NRC’s Public Document Room at 1-800-397-4209 

or 301-415-4737, or by e-mail at PDR.Resosurce@nrc.gov. Documents for Limerick license 

renewal application will be available on the NRC website on the license renewal Web page.

The NRC staff is currently conducting an initial review of the application to determine whether it 

contains enough information for the required formal review. If the application has sufficient 

information, the NRC will formally “docket,” or file, the application and will announce an 

opportunity to request a public hearing.

For further information, contact Robert Kuntz, Division of License Renewal Programs, 

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Mail Stop O11-F1, 

Washington, D.C. 20555; telephone 301-415-3733.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 11-119 June 30, 2011