68174 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 23, 2004 / Notices 

Officials of the Peabody Museum of 

Archaeology and Ethnology have 

determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 

3001 (9–10), the human remains 

described above represent the physical 

remains of one individual of Native 

American ancestry. Officials of the 

Peabody Museum of Archaeology and 

Ethnology also have determined that, 

pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (2), there is 

a relationship of shared group identity 

that can be reasonably traced between 

the Native American human remains 

and the Navajo Nation, Arizona, New 

Mexico & Utah.

Representatives of any other Indian 

tribe that believes itself to be culturally 

affiliated with the human remains 

should contact Patricia Capone, 

Repatriation Coordinator, Peabody 

Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, 

Harvard University, 11 Divinity Avenue, 

Cambridge, MA 02138, telephone (617) 

496–3702, before December 23, 2004. 

Repatriation of the human remains to 

the Navajo Nation, Arizona, New 

Mexico & Utah may proceed after that 

date if no additional claimants come 

forward.

The Peabody Museum of Archaeology 

and Ethnology is responsible for 

notifying the Hopi Tribe of Arizona; 

Navajo Nation, Arizona, New Mexico & 

Utah; Pueblo of Acoma, New Mexico; 

and Pueblo of Laguna, New Mexico that 

this notice has been published.

Dated: September 30, 2004

Sherry Hutt

Manager, National NAGPRA Program

[FR Doc. 04–25925 Filed 11–22–04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4312–50–S

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

Notice of Inventory Completion: 

University of Massachusetts, 

Department of Anthropology, Amherst, 

MA

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

Notice is here given in accordance 

with the Native American Graves 

Protection and Repatriation Act 

(NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3003, of the 

completion of an inventory of human 

remains in the possession of the 

University of Massachusetts, 

Department of Anthropology, Amherst, 

MA. The human remains were removed 

from the Fort Neck Burying Ground in 

Charlestown, Washington County, RI.

This notice is published as part of the 

National Park Service’s administrative 

responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25 

U.S.C. 3003 (d)(3). The determinations 

within this notice are the sole 

responsibility of the museum, 

institution, or Federal agency that has 

control of the Native American human 

remains. The National Park Service is 

not responsible for the determinations 

within this notice.

A detailed assessment of the human 

remains was made by the University of 

Massachusetts, Department of 

Anthropology professional staff in 

consultation with representatives of the 

Narragansett Indian Tribe of Rhode 

Island.

In September of 1912, human remains 

representing a minimum of eight 

individuals were removed from the Fort 

Neck Burying Ground, on the grounds of 

the James S. Kenyon estate in 

Charlestown, RI, by Dr. Harris 

Hawthorne Wilder, his wife Dr. Inez 

Whipple Wilder, and two assistants. No 

known individuals were identified 

among the remains excavated. The 

Wilders’ field notes indicate that there 

were wooden and metal coffin 

fragments, small cloth fragments, and 

shroud pins associated with some of the 

burials, but there is no indication that 

these items were collected with the 

burials. The University of Massachusetts 

is not in possession of either associated 

or unassociated funerary objects from 

these burials.

The human remains collected from 

the Fort Neck Burying Ground were 

originally exhibited in the ‘‘Smith 

Anthropological and Zoological 

Museum’’ at Burton Hall, Smith College, 

Northampton, MA. Each of the 

individual bones was marked in black 

Indian ink, with identification numbers, 

letters, and Roman numerals that 

matched up to the Wilders’ site map, 

excavation schedule, and collections 

storage system; each set of human 

remains was originally numbered 1, 2, 

5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, based on their 

location in the row. In 1966, Smith 

College transferred, as an extended loan, 

the human remains from the Fort Neck 

Burying Ground, along with other 

Native American remains, to the 

Anthropology Department of the 

University of Massachusetts, Amherst, 

where they were accessioned as part of 

the ‘‘Wilder Collection,’’ and 

incorporated into the existing teaching 

and research collections. In 1987, the 

University of Massachusetts assigned 

new accession numbers to the 

individuals from the Fort Neck Burying 

Ground as follows: 1987–019 (Wilder 

#1), 1987–006 (Wilder #2), 1987–015 

(Wilder #5), 1987–004 (Wilder #6), 

1987–007 (Wilder #7), 1987–018 

(Wilder #8), 1987–016 (Wilder #9), and 

1987–014 (Wilder #10).

The location of the Fort Neck Burying 

Ground was described in a 1912 

newspaper article: ‘‘The ancient burial 

place is beautifully located on Fort 

Neck, near Cross Mills in Charlestown, 

at the head of Powaget, or Charlestown 

pond. It lies near the old Indian trail, 

later known in Colonial days as the 

King’s or Queen’s highway, as chanced 

to be at the time the ruler of England. 

Later it was called the country road, and 

then again the Post road’’ (The Sun, 

Providence, RI, September 8, 1912). The 

Wilders got permission to excavate from 

the owners of the land, heirs of the late 

James S. Kenyon, and the town council 

of Charlestown. The Wilders’ site map 

of ‘‘Fort Neck Burying Ground - 

Charlestown, R.I. Excavation of 

September 1912’’ plots the location of 

10 burials in the one row targeted for 

study, and at least four additional rows. 

The site had been previously excavated 

on at least two occasions. In 1859, 

Charlestown citizens collected several 

skeletal elements and artifacts from this 

and other Narragansett burial sites that 

were apparently sent to Brown 

University. Dr. Usher Parsons of 

Providence later re-opened this 

graveyard and other sites to supply his 

own ‘‘repository of scientific 

curiosities’’ (Wilder Field Notebook #1, 

Charlestown, R.I., summer 1912, stored 

in Wilder Collection Series VI: 

Professional Activities, Box 29, Folder 

6, Smith College Archives).

An entry in the Smith College 

Zoology Department Accession Book 

describes the remains as follows: 

‘‘Collection of Skeletons from 

Charlestown, R.I. Fort Neck Burying 

ground. People from Narragansett 

Reservation, buried perhaps between 

1750–1840. Ten bodies. Excavated 1912 

by the Wilders. These not accessioned 

yet. (March 1919)’’ (Smith College 

Zoology Department Accession Book II, 

page 29, on file at University of 

Massachusetts, Amherst). The Wilders’

field notes indicate that two out of the 

ten graves they selected for excavation 

showed signs of previous disturbance, 

and the bodies were already missing. 

One empty grave had a marked 

headstone: ‘‘Here lieth ye Body of 

George ye son of Charles Ninigret, King 

of ye Natives and his wife Hannah’’; the 

footstone read: ‘‘Ninigret, George. 1731c 

- 22 Dec 1732.’’ The Ninigret family is 

identified as Niantic and Narragansett in 

Narragansett tribal genealogical records. 

No materials were removed from the 

two empty graves by the Wilders. The 

University of Massachusetts is now in 

possession of eight sets of human 

remains from the Fort Neck Burying 

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 23, 2004 / Notices 68175

Ground, none of which have been 

identified by name.

Based on Narragansett Indian tribal 

written and oral histories; colonial, 

local, and regional historic 

documentation; documents in the 

Wilder Collection at the University of 

Massachusetts and the Smith College 

Archives; Dr. Wilder’s reconstruction of 

genealogical information for the 

Narragansett peoples based on 

ethnographic interviews at the time of 

excavation; Narragansett Indian tribal 

genealogical records; geography; and 

proximity of the cemetery to the 

Narragansett Indian Tribal Reservation, 

it has been determined that the human 

remains described in this notice are 

affiliated with the Narragansett Indian 

Tribe of Rhode Island.

Officials of the University of 

Massachusetts, Department of 

Anthropology have determined that, 

pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (9–10), the 

human remains described above 

represent the physical remains of eight 

individuals of Native American 

ancestry. Officials of the University of 

Massachusetts, Department of 

Anthropology also have determined 

that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (2), 

there is a relationship of shared group 

identity that can be reasonably traced 

between these Native American human 

remains and the Narragansett Indian 

Tribe of Rhode Island.

Representatives of any other Indian 

tribe that believes itself to be culturally 

affiliated with the human remains 

should contact Ralph Faulkingham, 

Chair, Department of Anthropology, 

University of Massachusetts, Room 215 

Machmer Hall, Amherst, MA 01003, 

telephone (413) 545–0028, before 

December 23, 2004. Repatriation of the 

human remains to the Narragansett 

Indian Tribe of Rhode Island may 

proceed after that date if no additional 

claimants come forward.

The University of Massachusetts, 

Department of Anthropology is 

responsible for notifying the 

Narragansett Indian Tribe of Rhode 

Island that this notice has been 

published.

Dated: October 22, 2004

Sherry Hutt,

Manager, National NAGPRA Program.

[FR Doc. 04–25923 Filed 11–22–04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4312–50–S

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 731–TA–282 (Second 

Review)] 

Petroleum Wax Candles From China

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice of Commission 

determination to conduct a full five-year 

review concerning the antidumping 

duty order on petroleum wax candles 

from China. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice that it will proceed with a full 

review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)(5)) to determine whether 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

order on petroleum wax candles from 

China would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury within a reasonably foreseeable 

time. A schedule for the review will be 

established and announced at a later 

date. For further information concerning 

the conduct of this review and rules of 

general application, consult the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, part 201, subparts A through 

E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, 

subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 

207).

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 5, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server (http://

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

this review may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

November 5, 2004, the Commission 

determined that it should proceed to a 

full review in the subject five-year 

review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of 

the Act. The Commission found that the 

domestic interested party group 

response to its notice of institution (69 

F.R. 46182, August 2, 2004) was 

adequate and that the respondent 

interested party group response to its 

notice of institution was inadequate. 

The Commission also found that other 

circumstances warranted conducting a 

full review. A record of the 

Commissioners’ votes, the 

Commission’s statement on adequacy, 

and any individual Commissioner’s 

statements will be available from the 

Office of the Secretary and at the 

Commission’s web site.

Authority: This review is being conducted 

under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act 

of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to 

section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules.

By order of the Commission.

Issued: November 17, 2004. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission.

[FR Doc. 04–25894 Filed 11–22–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–54,945; TA–W–54,945A] 

Amcor Plastube, Inc., Breinigsville, 

Pennsylvania; Amcor Plastube, Inc., 

Lake in the Hills, Illinois; Amended 

Certification Regarding Eligibility To 

Apply for Worker Adjustment 

Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273) the 

Department of Labor issued a Notice of 

Certification Regarding Eligibility to 

Apply for Worker Adjustment 

Assistance on June 16, 2004, applicable 

to workers of Amcor Plastube, Inc., 

Breinigsville, Pennsylvania. The notice 

was published in the Federal Register

on July 7, 2004 (69 FR 40984). 

At the request of the State agency, the 

Department reviewed the certification 

for workers of the subject firm. New 

information shows that a separation 

occurred involving an employee of 

Amcor Plastube, Inc., Breinigsville, 

Pennsylvania, working in Lake in the 

Hills, Illinois. Mr. James Sonsalla 

provided support services for the 

production of plastic squeeze tubes and 

polyfoil tubes for the cosmetic industry 

that are produced by the firm. 

Based on these findings, the 

Department is amending this 

certification to extend coverage to the 

employee of the Breinigsville, 

Pennsylvania facility of Amcor Plastube, 

Inc., working in Lake in the Hills, 

Illinois. 

The intent of the Department’s 

certification is to include all workers of 

Amcor Plastube, Inc., Breinigsville, 

Pennsylvania, who were adversely