alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

In connection with the report of LFG International, Inc. (the"Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2005, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Lyle Durham,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Sect 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sect 1350), that to my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

***/s/ Lyle Durham                                   ***

Lyle Durham, Chief Financial Officerand

Chief Executive Officer

Dated: December 20, 2005
NRC MEETINGS IN ROCKVILLE, MD, APRIL 12 TO DISCUSS FUKUSHIMA 

LESSONS LEARNED, CONTAINMENT VENTING SYSTEMS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold separate meetings April 12 related to 

the lessons learned from the March 2011 nuclear accident in Fukushima, Japan.

The first meeting will cover general issues of schedules and guidance for actions 

stemming from the NRC’s Japan Near-Term Task Force recommendations; the second will 

discuss specific issues related to enhancing requirements for venting systems at U.S. plants 

similar to those involved in the Fukushima accident.

Both meetings will be held in the Commission Hearing Room on the first floor of the 

NRC’s White Flint complex at 11555 Rockville Pike in Rockville. The general meeting between 

senior NRC managers and industry executives will run from 9 a.m.-noon. The meeting on 

venting systems for “Mark I” and “Mark II” containments will run from 1-5 p.m. The public is 

invited to observe the meetings and offer comments or ask questions at specific points in the 

agenda.

Both meetings will include teleconferences; the general meeting will be webcast and the 

venting system meeting will include a webinar. To ensure adequate teleconference and webinar

resources are available, those interested in using those services should contact Rajender Auluck

at 301-415-1025 or rajender.auluck@nrc.gov by April 11.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 13-022 April 3, 2013
EXHIBIT 31.2  CERTIFICATION  I, Adam Wasserman, certify that:  1.
        I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Gold Horse International, Inc.;
  2.
        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3.
        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
  4.
        The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
  (a)
        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  (b)
        Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
  (c)
        Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting;
  5.
        The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  (a)
        All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
  (b)
        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Adam Wasserman Name: Adam Wasserman Title: Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer  Dated: August 1, 2008
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOGA SINGH,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-73616

Agency No. A079-570-221

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 14, 2013** 

Before: SCHROEDER, GRABER, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Joga Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal

proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of

FILED

AUG 16 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-73616

discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen. Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d

983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Singh’s motion to reopen as

untimely where the motion was filed over three years after the BIA’s final order,

see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Singh failed to present sufficient evidence of

changed circumstances in India to qualify for the regulatory exception to the time

limit for filing motions to reopen, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); Malty v.

Ashcroft, 381 F.3d 942, 945 (9th Cir. 2004) (“The critical question is . . . whether

circumstances have changed sufficiently that a petitioner who previously did not

have a legitimate claim for asylum now has a well-founded fear of future

persecution.”). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### Amos Jones, Appellant, v. Lottie Veeck et al., Appellees.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Appeal from City Court of Alton; the Hon. James E. Duiwegan, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the March term, 1915.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed December 1, 1915.

Statement of the Case.

Action by Amos J ones,. plaintiff, against Lottie Veeck, Julius F. Veeck, Julius Veeck and Rosa L. Veeck, defendants, to recover commissions for the sale or exchange of real estate. From a judgment against him, the plaintiff appeals.

J. V. E. Marsh, for appellant.

William P. Boynton, for appellees.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice Boggs

delivered the opinion of the court.

*120Abstract of the Decision.

1. Principal and agent, § *72*
      ***
      *—when agent acting for both parties not entitled to recover commission.*While an agent’s right of recovery against his principal for commissions will not he defeated where the latter had knowledge that the agent was also acting for the other party to the transaction and consented to his receipt of compensation therefor, lack of such knowledge and consent on the part of the principal will defeat the agent’s action.

2. Appeal and error, § *1411*
      ***
      *—when verdict not disturbed on appeal.*Where there is a direct conflict of evidence as to the knowledge of a principal that his agent was also acting for the other party to the transaction and as to the principal’s consent that the agent should receive compensation therefor, the question is one for the jury, whose verdict will not be disturbed on appeal in the absence of serious errors in the rulings on the admission of testimony or in the instructions.

3. Appeal and error, § *1712*
      ***
      *—when errors abandoned .in argument not considered.*Where the appellant wholly abandons in his argument certain assignments of error on the record, the Appellate Court is not required, under the rules, to give them any attention.

4. Brokers, § *84*
      ***
      *—when evidence as to why transaction not completed competent.*In a real estate broker’s action against his principal for commissions for effecting a sale or exchange of property, evidence as to why the transaction was never consummated held competent as tending to show that the broker had forfeited his right to commission.

5. Appeal and error, § *1410*
      ***
      *—when verdict not disturbed on appeal.*In the absence of serious error in the rulings of the trial court where the questions involved are principally those of fact, the Appellate Court is not warranted in disturbing the verdict of the jury unless it is against the manifest weight of evidence.
§ 908.1 Definitions. As used in this part, terms shall have the meaning ascribed in this section. ( a ) *Administrator.* The Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
( b ) *Person.* Any individual, corporation, company, association, firm, partnership, society, joint stock company, any State or local government or any agency thereof, or any other organization, whether commercial or nonprofit, except where acting solely as an employee, agent, or independent contractor of the Federal government.
( c ) *Weather modification activity.* Any activity performed with the intention of producing artificial changes in the composition, behavior, or dynamics of the atmosphere.
( d ) *United States.* The several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and any territory or insular possession of the United States.
( e ) *Persons whose activities relate to weather modification.* Persons engaged in weather modification activities or engaged in the distribution or sale of weather modification apparatus or materials known by them to be destined for use in weather modification activities.
( f ) *Project.* A related series of weather modification activities having a common objective.
( g ) *Target area.* The ground area within which the effects of the weather modification activity are expected to be found.
( h ) *Control area.* A preselected, untreated ground area used for comparison with a target area.
( i ) *Weather modification apparatus.* Any apparatus used with the intention of producing artificial changes in the composition, behavior, or dynamics of the atmosphere. For example: Seeding generators, propane devices, flares, rockets, artillery projectiles, jet engines, etc.
( j ) *Sponsor.* The primary person for whom the weather modification activity is performed.
( k ) *Operator.* The person who is primarily responsible for carrying out the weather modification activity.
[41 FR 23394, June 10, 1976, as amended at 46 FR 32233, June 22, 1981]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Page 18 of 19


                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(g)

                         Independent Accountant's Report
                           of Ernst & Young regarding
                                   Great Lakes

                        Report of Independent Accountants

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report of
Management on Compliance with Specified Key Alternative Loan Program
Requirements, that Great Lakes Educational Loan Services, Inc. (Great Lakes)
complied with the specified requirements of the Subservicing Agreement (KeyCorp
Student Loan Trust 1999-B) between Key Bank USA, National Association and Great
Lakes dated as of September 1, 1999 (Subservicing Agreement) during the period
September 1, 1999 through December 31, 2000. Management is responsible for Great
Lakes' compliance with those requirements. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assertion about Great Lakes' compliance based on our
examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about Great Lakes'
compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures, as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a
legal determination on Great Lakes' compliance with specified requirements.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Great Lakes complied with the
aforementioned requirements during the period September 1, 1999 through December
31, 2000 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of management of
Great Lakes Educational Loan Services, Inc.; Bank One, National Association;
Bankers Trust Company; Moody's Investor Services, Inc.; Standard and Poor's
Ratings Services; Fitch IBCA; and Key Bank USA, National Association, and is not
intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified
parties.

                                      /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


                                      January 5, 2001
#### § 265.19 Unattended vehicles.

No person shall leave a motor vehicle unattended on the site with the engine running or a key in the ignition switch or the vehicle not effectively braked.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 6856

OSBALDO LEMUS BERRIOS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. DINO E. FLORES, Esq.; SCHAFFER, BLACK & FLORES, P.C. , Defendant s - Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Theodore D. Chuang , District Judge. ( 8:20

- cv - 03198

- TDC )

Submitted : December 21, 2021 Decided: December 27, 2021

Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Osbaldo Lemus Berrios, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Osbaldo Lemus Berrios appeals the district court’s order dismissing Berrios’ civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s order

. See Berrios v. Flores , No

. 8:20

- cv - 03198

- TDC ( D. Md

. May 6 , 2021 ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
No. 89-6447.

#### Graves *v.*Careercom Corp.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 35.3

SERVICER COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB UNDER THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

|   | Re: | HSBC Credit Card Master Note Trust (USA) I – 2006-1 |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------|

I, James F. Vacca, Vice President, Item Processing of HSBC Technology & Services (USA) Inc. (the “Company”), pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB under the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 3.05 of the Second Amended and Restated Transfer and Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2006 (the “Agreement”), among HSBC Receivables Funding Inc. I, as Transferor, HSBC Finance Corporation, as Servicer, and Wilmington Trust Company, as Owner Trustee of the HSBC Credit Card Master Note Trust (USA) I, hereby certify that:

 

|   | 1. | A review of the activities of the Company from September 15, 2006 through December 31, 2006 and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period referred to above except as set forth below: |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | NONE |
|--------|------|

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this certificate on behalf of the Company this 5th  day of March 2007.                   

 

HSBC Technology & Services (USA) Inc.

 

 

|   | By: | /s/ James F. Vacca |
|--------|-----|--------------------|

|   | Name: | James F. Vacca |
|--------|-------|----------------|

|   | Title: | Vice President, Item Processing |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------|
### Part C—Energy Efficient Products
### subpart i—general grant provisions

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 104–146, §7(b)(1), May 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1368, added heading "subpart i—general grant provisions".
### §7618. Additional program requirements

(a) Program Modification.—Notwithstanding any provision of this subchapter, the Secretary shall carry out this subchapter after the date of the enactment of this section by modifying the Scholarship Program in such a manner that the program and hiring processes are designed to fully employ Scholarship Program graduates as soon as possible, if not immediately, upon graduation and completion of necessary certifications, and to actively assist and monitor graduates to ensure certifications are obtained in a minimal amount of time following graduation.

(b) Clinical Tours.—The Secretary shall require participants in the Scholarship Program to perform clinical tours in assignments or locations determined by the Secretary while the participants are enrolled in the course of education or training for which the scholarship is provided.

(c) Mentors.—The Secretary shall ensure that at the commencement of the period of obligated service of a participant in the Scholarship Program, the participant is assigned to a mentor who is employed in the same facility where the participant performs such service.

(Added Pub. L. 111–163, title VI, §603(c)(2), May 5, 2010, 124 Stat. 1173.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of the enactment of this section, referred to in subsec. (a), is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 111–163, which was approved May 5, 2010.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 7618 was renumbered section 7619 of this title.
No: 13-076 September 12, 2013

CONTACT: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200 

NRC to Hold Public Meeting Sept. 26 in Carlsbad, Calif., on the

Nuclear Power Reactor Decommissioning Process

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a public meeting Sept. 26 in Carlsbad, 

Calif., to discuss the decommissioning process for nuclear power reactors, including the San Onofre 

Nuclear Generating Station in southern California.

The meeting will be held at the Omni LaCosta Hotel, 2100 Costa del Mar Road, in Carlsbad, 

from 6-9 p.m. Doors will open at 5 p.m. to allow for security screening. NRC technical staff will give a 

presentation lasting approximately 45 minutes describing the regulations and process covering 

decommissioning of nuclear power reactors, and then take questions from the public. 

Southern California Edison has certified to the NRC that it has permanently ceased operations 

of San Onofre Units 2 and 3 and removed fuel from the reactors. Unit 1 was permanently shut down in 

1992. The plant is located near San Clemente.
Martin, Michael (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Everyone: 

Martin, Michael (OST) 

Wednesday, June 06, 2012 3:18 PM 

'Jack Skinner (skinner@laramieairport.com)';.'<3arx rriompso~ r, 1 8 

(worlandairport@rtconnect.net)'; 'mayor@rtconnect.net' 

Brad Rawson; mike.thompson@skywest.com; 'chowell@flygreatlakes.com'; 

'dvoss@flygreatlakes.com'; amber.schlabs@wyo.gov 

EAS proposals at Laramie and Worland, WY 

Great Lakes Laramie Worland Proposal 6 5 2012.pdf; SkyWest EAS bid for LAR 2012.pdf 

I would like to update you on the Essential Air Service (EAS) situation at Laramie and Worland, WY, and give you an 

opportunity to offer any comments on the record before we submit a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary for 

Aviation and International Affairs. We issued Order 2012-4-31, April 26, 2012, requesting proposals from airlines 

interested in providing Essential Air Service (EAS) for a new term at Laramie and Worland, WY. In response to our 

request, Great Lakes, the incumbent, submitted a proposal to serve both communities, and SkyWest submitted a 

proposal to serve just Laramie. 

I have attached both airlines' proposals for your review. I expect each airline's proposal to be uploaded on 

www.regulations.gov by this afternoon. I request that you review each proposal and submit any comments you may 

have as soon as possible, but no later than Tuesday, July 10. Please send your comments directly to me via e-mail at 

michael.f.martin@dot.gov. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. 

Michael Martin 

United States Department of Transportation 

Essential Air Service (EAS) and Small Community Air Service Development Program (SCASDP) 

(202) 366-6494 

1
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-13-0080 - Final Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules

Accession Number: ML112920115

Date Released: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML13137A148 - SECY-13-0080 - FINAL PLAN FOR RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF EXISTING RULES (4 page(s), 7/29/2013)
    - ML13137A178 - SECY-13-0080 - Enclosure 1 - NRC's Final Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules (19 page(s), 7/29/2013)
    - ML13137A210 - SECY-13-0080 - Enclosure 2 - Federal Register Notice for NRC's Final Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules (13 page(s), 7/29/2013)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### Mabel P. Hunt, as Administratrix of the Estate of Robert Hunt, Deceased, Appellant, v. Foster Wheeler Corporation, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party, upon the ground that upon the record before us it appears that it had been determined that the deceased at the time of his injury and death was an employee of both defendants. All concur. (Appeal from an order granting a motion by defendant Foster Wheeler Corporation for a stay until the decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board has become final and until appeals have been finally determined.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.