UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T RI CH A RD W . LEW I S, P la in tif

f - c o u n te r - d e f

e n d a n t - A pp el l ee , v. TY RO N E D U FF; LI N D A D U FF, D efen d an t s-co u n t er-cl ai m an t s - A p p e lla n ts , a nd D A V I D A N T O N U C C I O ; e t a l., D efen d an t s. N o. 08- 17314 D. C . No . 3 : 9 9 - c v - 0 0 3 8 6 - L R HR AM D is tr ic t o f

N e v a d a , R e no ORDER

B ef ore: T A S H IM A , B E R Z O N , and C L IF T O N , C i rc ui tJudg es T h e m e m o r a n d u m d is p o s itio n f ile d o n N o v e m b e r2 3 , 2 0 1 0 , is w ith d r a w n . A re pl ac em entm em orandu m di sposi t i on w i l l be fi l ed concurrent l y w i th thi s order . T he pa ne l ha s vot e d t o de nythe pe t i t i on f orpa ne l r e he a r i ng. T he f ul l c ourtha s be e n a dvi s e d of the pe t i t i on f

orr e he a r i ng e n ba nc a nd no ju d g e h a s r e q u e s te d av o te o n w h e th e rto r e h e a rth e m a tte re n b a n c . See Fe d . R. A pp. P . 35. T y r one a nd L i ndaD uf

f s ’ pe t i t i on f

orpa ne l r e he a r i ng a nd pe t i t i on f or 

# FI LED MA R 18 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 17314 2 r e h e a r in g e n b a n c a r e d e n ie d . N o f u rth e rf ilin g s s h a ll b e a c c e p te d in th is c lo s e d ap p e a l.T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T RI CH A RD W . LEW I S, P la in tif

f - c o u n te r - d e f

e n d a n t - A pp el l ee , v. TY RO N E D U FF; LI N D A D U FF, D efen d an t s-co u n t er-cl ai m an t s - A p p e lla n ts , a nd D A V I D A N T O N U C C I O ; e t a l., D efen d an t s. N o. 08- 17314 D. C . No . 3 : 9 9 - c v - 0 0 3 8 6 - L R HR AM ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

N e va da L a rryR . H i c ks , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r16, 2010 ** 

# FI LED MA R 18 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 17314 2 B efo re: T A S H IM A , B E R Z O N , an d C L IF T O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. T y r one a nd L i ndaD uf

f appe a l pr o s e f

r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e nt i m po si ng m on et ary s anct i on s and ent er i ng a pre -f i l i ng re vi ew order a gai nstthem un der i t s i nh er entpo w er . W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 28 U . S . C . § 1 29 1. W e r evi ew f o ra n ab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n . F. J

. H ans haw E nte rs . , I

nc . v . E m e r ald R i v e rD e v . , I nc ., 2 4 4 F .3 d 1 1 2 8 , 1 1 3 5 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 1 ) ; D e L on g v. H enness ey , 912 F . 2d 1144, 1146 ( 9th C i r . 1990) . W e va c a t e a nd r e m a nd. T he di stri ctcourtdi d n otcl earl y e rrby fi nd i ng thatthe D uffs engaged i n b ad f a i th c onduc tbyw i l l f

ul l yr e f us i ng t o appe a ra the a r i ngs a nd byf i l i ng dupl i c a t i ve a nd f r i vol ous doc um e nt s , a nd thus the c ourtha d the i nhe r e ntpow e rt o s a nc t i on th e m . See G om ezv . V

e rnon , 2 5 5 F . 3 d 1 1 1 8 , 1 1 3 3 -3 4 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 1 ). T h e D u ffs’ c ont e nt i ons tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourtl a c ke d j ur i s di c t i on t o s a nc t i on the m or ju r is d ic tio n o v e rth e a c tio n a r e w ith o u t m e r it. H ow ever , w e vac at e the $2 3, 14 9. 98 sanct i on i m po se d. T he sanct i on w as cr i m i nal i n n ature, because i tw as i nt ended t o p un i sh the D uffs for thei r c on du ct and t o v i nd i ca t e the court ’ s autho ri ty, no tsol el y t o com pensat e pl ai nt i ff or coer ce th e D u f f s in to c o m p lia n c e w ith ac o u rt o r d e r . See F. J. H a n sh a w E n ters . , 244 F . 3d at11 37 -38. T he am ou ntof the sanct i on w as a “ se ri ou s c ri m i nal penal t [y ] . ” Se e i d. at1 1 3 8 . B ecau se th e san ct i o n w as cri m i n al i n n atu re an d th e am o u n tw as a08- 17314 3 “ se ri ou s” penal ty, the D uffs w er e e nt i t l ed t o the ful l du e proces s prot ec t i on s of a c r im in a l ju rytr ia l, s e e i d. , w hi ch they di d n otre ce i ve. O n rem and, the di stri ct courtm ayre i nst i tut e c ri m i nal sanct i on proceedi ng s s o l on g as the D uffs ar e p r o v id e d th e r e q u is ite p r o te c tio n s . Se e id. at11 41 -42. A l t ernat i vel y, the di stri ct c o u rt m a yim p o s e am o n e ta rys a n c tio n th a t is c iv il in n a tu r e o rn o t “s e r io u s ,” w ith o u t f u rth e rp r o c e e d in g s , b e c au s e th e D u f f s w e r e p r e v io u s lyg iv e n a d e q u a te n o tic e a n d a n o p p o rtu n ityto b e h e a r d . Se e L as arv . Ford MotorC o. , 399 F . 3d 11 01 , 11 10 -12 & n. 7 (9th C i r. 20 05 ). W e a l s o va c a t e the e ntryof the pr e - f i l i ng r e vi e w or de r . O n r e m a nd, the di stri ctcourtshou l d con si der w hether D e L on g v. H enness eya l l ow s i m pos i t i on of ap r e - f ilin g r e v ie w o r d e ra g a in s t ad e f e n d a n t, a n d if

s o , th e c o u rt s h o u ld e x p r e s s ly addres s the D e L ongfa ct ors i n d et erm i ni ng w hether t o i m po se a pre -f i l i ng re vi ew o r d e ra g a in s t th e D u f

f s . See 912 F . 2d a t1147- 48. T h e D u f f s s h a ll b e a rth e iro w n c o s ts o n ap p e a l. V AC AT E D a n d RE MAND E D.