alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No: 14-030 May 6, 2014

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200

NRC Seeks Comment on Supplement to Certification Rule

for General Electric-Hitachi New Reactor Design

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is seeking public comment on a supplement to the

proposed rule to certify General Electric-Hitachi’s (GEH) Economic Simplified Boiling Water Reactor 

(ESBWR) design. The supplement would add to the agency’s March 2011 proposed rule.

The supplement covers changes to analysis of the design’s steam dryer, which prevents excess 

moisture from damaging a nuclear power plant’s electricity-generating turbine. Since early 2012, NRC 

reviewers have been requesting and then examining additional steam dryer information from GEH. The 

supplement also formally incorporates several dozen reference documents as requirements in the draft 

certification rule.

The design certification process includes public participation as the NRC resolves any safety 

issues for proposed reactor designs. NRC certification, in the form of a final rule, means the design 

meets the agency’s safety requirements. An applicant for a nuclear power plant license using a certified 

design doesn’t need to submit safety information for the certified design. Instead, the license 

application and the NRC’s safety review would address the remaining safety issues for the proposed 

nuclear power plant.

The proposed rule supplement is available on regulations.gov under Docket ID NRC-2010-

0135. Comments on the topics covered by the supplement may be submitted until June 5 through 

regulations.gov; by e-mail to Rulemaking.Comments@nrc.gov; by mail to Secretary, U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001, ATTN: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff; 

or by fax to Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, at 301-415-1101. 

More information about the ESBWR design review can be found on the NRC’s website. The 

NRC is currently reviewing two Combined License applications referencing the GEH design. Detroit 

Edison Company is seeking a license for Fermi Unit 3 in Monroe County, Michigan, and Dominion is 

seeking a license for North Anna Unit 3 in Louisa County, Virginia. The NRC has certified four other 

standard reactor designs: the Advanced Boiling Water Reactor, System 80+, AP600, and AP1000.
### Part B—Geothermal Energy
§ 713.4 Advance declaration requirements for additionally planned production, processing, or consumption of Schedule 2 chemicals. ( a ) *Declaration requirements for additionally planned activities.* ( 1 ) You must declare additionally planned production, processing, or consumption of Schedule 2 chemicals after the annual declaration on anticipated activities for the next calendar year has been delivered to BIS if: ( i ) You plan that a previously undeclared plant on your plant site under § 713.2(a)(1)(ii) of the CWCR will produce, process, or consume a Schedule 2 chemical above the applicable declaration threshold;
( ii ) You plan to produce, process, or consume at a plant declared under § 713.2(a)(1)(ii) of the CWCR an additional Schedule 2 chemical above the applicable declaration threshold;
( iii ) You plan an additional activity (production, processing, or consumption) at your declared plant above the applicable declaration threshold for a chemical declared under § 713.2(a)(1)(ii) of the CWCR;
( iv ) You plan to increase the production, processing, or consumption of a Schedule 2 chemical by a plant declared under § 713.2(a)(1)(ii) of the CWCR from the amount exceeding the applicable declaration threshold to an amount exceeding the applicable inspection threshold (see § 716.1(b)(2) of the CWCR);
( v ) You plan to change the starting or ending date of anticipated production, processing, or consumption declared under § 713.2(a)(1)(ii) of the CWCR by more than three months; or
( vi ) You plan to increase your production, processing, or consumption of a Schedule 2 chemical by a declared plant site by 20 percent or more above that declared under § 713.2(a)(1)(ii) of the CWCR.
( 2 ) If you must submit a declaration on additionally planned activities because you plan to engage in any of the activities listed in paragraphs (a)(1)(i) through (vi) of this section, you also should declare changes to your declaration relating to the following activities. You do not have to submit an additionally planned declaration if you are only changing the following non-quantitative activities: ( i ) Changes to the plant's production capacity;
( ii ) Changes or additions to the product group codes for the plant site or the plant(s);
( iii ) Changes to the plant's activity status (i.e., dedicated, multipurpose, or other status);
( iv ) Changes to the plant's multipurpose activities;
( v ) Changes to the plant site's status relating to domestic transfer of the chemical;
( vi ) Changes to the plant site's purposes for which the chemical will be produced, processed or consumed; or
( vii ) Changes to the plant site's status relating to exports of the chemical or the addition of new countries for export.
( b ) *Declaration forms to be used.* If you are required to declare additionally planned activities pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, you must complete the Certification Form and Forms 2-1, 2-2, 2-3, and 2-3C as appropriate. Such forms are due to BIS at least 15 days prior to beginning the additional activity.
§ 1.82 Declaration of policy. ( a ) Except for actions which are not subject to the requirements of section 102(2)(C) of NEPA, no Commission proposal for a major action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment will be instituted unless an environmental impact statement has been prepared for consideration in the decisionmaking. All relevant environmental documents, comments, and responses as provided in this subpart shall accompany such proposal through all review processes. “Major actions, significantly affecting the quality of the human environment” referred to in this subpart “do not include bringing judicial or administrative civil or criminal enforcement actions” CEQ Regulation (40 CFR 1508.18(a)). In the event that the Commission in an administrative enforcement proceeding actively contemplates the adoption of standards or a form of relief which it determines may have a significant effect on the environment, the Commission will, when consistent with the requirements of law, provide for the preparation of an environmental assessment or an environmental impact statement or such other action as will permit the Commission to assess alternatives with a view toward avoiding or minimizing any adverse effect upon the environment.
( b ) No Commission proposal for legislation significantly affecting the quality of the human environment and concerning a subject matter in which the Commission has primary responsibility will be submitted to Congress without an accompanying environmental impact statement.
( c ) When the Commission finds that emergency action is necessary and an environmental impact statement cannot be prepared in conformance with the CEQ Regulations, the Commission will consult with CEQ about alternative arrangements in accordance with CEQ Regulation (40 CFR 1506.11).
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 15-915.3

________________________________________________________________________

ATOMIC ENERGY

Nuclear Safety

Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

and the NETHERLANDS

Extending the Arrangement

of September 18, 2013

Signed at Vienna September 15, 2015
 

NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent

evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof

or authentication thereof.”
 

 NETHERLANDS

 Atomic Energy: Nuclear Safety

 Agreement extending the arrangement of 

 September 18, 2013.

 Signed at Vienna September 15, 2015;

 Entered into force September 15, 2015.

 
AGREEMENT EXTENDING THE ARRANGEMENT 

BETWEEN 

THE UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULA TORY 

COMMISSION 

AND 

THEAUTHOIDTYFORNUCEARSAFETYAND 

RADIATION PROTECTION OF THE NETHERLANDS 

FOR THE 

EXCHANGE OF TECHNICAL INFORMATION 

AND 

COOPERATION IN NUCLEAR SAFETY MATTERS 

SEPTEMBER 15, 2015 
AGREEMENT EXTENDING THE ARRANGEMENT 

BETWEEN 

THE UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

AND 

THE AUTHORITY FOR NUCEAR SAFETY AND RADIATION 

PROTECTION OF THE NETHERLANDS 

FOR THE EXCHANGE OF TECHNICAL INFORMATION AND 

COOPERATION IN NUCLEAR SAFETY MATTERS 

The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) and the Authority for Nuclear 

Safety and Radiation Protection of the Netherlands (ANVS), hereinafter "the Parties;" 

Recalling the Arrangement Between the USNRC and the Department of Nuclear and Radiation 

Safety, Security and Safeguards (KFD) of The Netherlands for the Exchange of Technical 

Information and Cooperation In Nuclear Safety Matters, signed at Vienna on September 18, 

2013 (the Arrangement), which by its terms will expire on September 18, 2015; and 
2 

Recognizing that the KFD has been succeeded by the ANVS; and 

Guided by their desire to continue cooperation under the Arrangement as envisaged by Section 

IV.D. of the Arrangement; 

Hereby agree as follows: 

1. The duration of the Arrangement shall be extended for one year. The Arrangement shall 

therefore remain in force until September 18, 2016. 

2. All references in the Arrangement to "the Department of Nuclear and Radiation Safety, 

Security and Safeguards" and "KFD" shall be replaced by references to "the Authority for 

Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection" and "ANVS," respectively. 

3. This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature of the Parties. 

Signed at Vienna, this 151

h day of September, 2015, in two originals, in the English language. 

FOR THE UNITED STATES NUCLEAR 

REGULATORY _90MM~SION 

Jan . van den Heuvel, General Director
May 21, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DERRICK WAYNE MIDDLETON, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00481-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in judgment. 

The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED, and that this decision be certified 

below for observance.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

DL/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

XIU YUN CHEN,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-72269

Agency No. A096-390-212

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 16, 2010** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Xiu Yun Chen, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum,

FILED

FEB 23 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
DL/Research 2 07-72269

withholding of removal, and relied under the Convention Against Torture

(“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the

petition for review.

The IJ denied Chen’s asylum, withholding of removal and CAT claims

based on his finding that Chen could relocate within China. Chen failed to exhaust

her challenge to the IJ’s dispositive internal relocation finding before the BIA, and

therefore we dismiss the petition for review as to Chen’s claims. See Zara v.

Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 927, 931 (9th Cir. 2004) (declining “to hold that the BIA’s

streamlining decision excused the administrative requirement of exhaustion of

remedies”). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
### Part K—Minority Fellowship Program
SANDEE BRYAN MARION

CHIEF JUSTICE

KAREN ANGELINI

MARIALYN BARNARD

REBECA C. MARTINEZ

PATRICIA 0. ALVAREZ

LUZ ELENA D. CHAPA

JASON PULLIAM

JUSTICES

COURT OF APPEALS

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

CADENA-REEVES JUSTICE CENTER

300 DOLOROSA. SUITE 3200

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78205-3037

WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV/4THCOA.ASPX

Dan Pozza

Law Offices of Dan Pozza

239 East Commerce Street

San Antonio, TX 78205

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Robert B. Gilbreath

Hawkins, Parnell & Thackston, L.L.P.

Highland Park Place

4514 Cole Avenue, Suite 500

Dallas, TX 75205

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

January 14, 2015

Eric Turton

6039 Whitby Road #202

San Antonio, TX 78240

Carl Kolb

926 Chulie Dr

San Antonio, TX 78216-6522

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

KEITH E. HO'ITLE

CLERK OF COURT

TELEPHONE

(210)335-2635

FACSIMILE NO.

(210)335-2762

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 04-13-00239-CV

Trial Court Case Number: 2010-CI-14280

Style: Law Office ofOscar C. Gonzalez, Inc. and Oscar Gonzalez

v.

Isabel Sloan

The Appellee's Vacation Letter in the above styled and numbered cause has this date

been received from Carl Kolb.

Very truly yours,

KTH E. HOTTLE. CLERK

k^L g±z==±

Jonathan Quintero

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53220
Table 1.  Relationship Between Race Categories in NCHS Data and Categories Mandated by OMB

Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census
Internet Release date: June 1997

       NCHS Category                               OMB Mandated Category

           White-------------------------------------------White

           Black-------------------------------------------Black

           American Indian, Eskimo, or Aleut---------------American Indian and Alaska Native

           Chinese--------------------------|
                                            |
           Japanese                         |
                                            |
           Hawaiian                         |--------------Asian or Pacific Islander
                                            |
           Filipino                         |
                                            |
           Other Asian or Pacific Islander--|

           All other races---------------------------------must be recoded into one of the above categories
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in each of the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-53222), Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-86968) and the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-107079) pertaining to TradeStation Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
of our reports dated March 8, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of TradeStation Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries, TradeStation Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of TradeStation Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries, included in this annual report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006.



/s/ Ernst & Young LLPCertified Public Accountants


Fort Lauderdale, Florida,

March 8, 2007.
§ 921.30 Designation of National Estuarine Research Reserves. ( a ) The Under Secretary may designate an area proposed for designation by the Governor of the state in which it is located, as a National Esturaine Research Reserve if the Under Secretary finds: ( 1 ) The area is a representative estuarine ecosystem that is suitable for long-term research and contributes to the biogeographical and typological balance of the System;
( 2 ) Key land and water areas of the proposed Reserve, as identified in the management plan, are under adequate state control sufficient to provide long-term protection for reserve resources to ensure a stable environment for research;
( 3 ) Designation of the area as a Reserve will serve to enhance public awareness and understanding of estuarine areas, and provide suitable opportunities for public education and interpretation;
( 4 ) A final management plan has been approved by NOAA;
( 5 ) An MOU has been signed between the state and NOAA ensuring a long-term commitment by the state to the effective operation and implementation of the area as a National Estuarine Research Reserve;
( 6 ) All MOU's necessary for reserve management (*i.e.,* with relevant Federal, state, and local agencies and/or private organizations) have been signed; and
( 7 ) The coastal state in which the area is located has complied with the requirements of subpart B.
( b ) NOAA will determine whether the designation of a National Estuarine Research Reserve in a state with a federally approved coastal zone management program directly affects the coastal zone. If the designation is found to directly affect the coastal zone, NOAA will make a consistency determination pursuant to § 307(c)(1) of the Act, 16 U.S.C. 1456, and 15 CFR part 930, subpart C. See § 921.4(b). The results of this consistency determination will be published in the Federal Register when the notice of designation is published. See § 921.30(c).
( c ) NOAA will publish the notice of designation of a National Estuarine Research Reserve in the Federal Register. The state shall be responsible for having a similar notice published in the local media.
( d ) The term *state control* in § 921.30(a)(3) does not necessarily require that key land and water areas be owned by the state in fee simple. Acquisition of less-than-fee simple interests e.g., conservation easements) and utilization of existing state regulatory measures are encouraged where the state can demonstrate that these interests and measures assure adequate long-term state control consistent with the purposes of the research reserve (see also §§ 921.13(a)(7); 921.21(g)). Should the state later elect to purchase an interest in such lands using NOAA funds, adequate justification as to the need for such acquisition must be provided to NOAA.
### §1007. Seniority for employees in rural service

Subject to agreements made under chapter 12 of this title, the seniority of an employee of the Postal Service occupying a position whose regular duty involves the collection and delivery of mail on a rural route shall be preserved. Seniority for such employee shall commence on the first day of his service in such a position, or, in the event such an employee transfers to another such position, on the day he enters duty in the other position. Upon initial assignment, such an employee shall be assigned to the least desirable route and shall attain assignment to more desirable routes by seniority. Promotions and assignments for such an employee in such position shall be based on seniority and ability. If ability be sufficient, seniority shall govern.

(Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 732.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1971, pursuant to Resolution No. 71–9 of the Board of Governors. See section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note preceding section 101 of this title.
#### Esther M. Scharer, Respondent, v. Harry Scharer, Appellant.

Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region III

2443 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. III-13-011

Contact: Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil (630) 829-9663

April 5, 2013

E-Mail: OPA3.Resource@nrc.gov 

NRC CITES KEWAUNEE FOR AN ISSUE IN EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff issued a violation to Kewaunee Nuclear Power 

Plant, which will result in additional oversight. The plant operated by Dominion Energy 

Kewaunee is located near Kewaunee, Wisc., approximately 27 miles southeast of Green Bay.

NRC inspectors identified the violation during a December 2012 emergency preparedness 

inspection. The violation involved the plant’s failure to identify the loss of an indicator to

monitor system and effluent parameters for accurately classifying and declaring a general 

emergency and a site area emergency. Alternative methods were available to make the necessary 

emergency classification and declaration.

The utility has restored the instrument, returned it to service and has taken corrective 

actions to better assess emergency equipment failures.

“Even though the issue did not have an impact on the public, the NRC requires measures 

be in place and maintained to ensure the health and safety of the public is protected during 

certain emergency events,” said Region III Administrator Charles Casto. “We have inspected

the plant’s corrective actions and know there were alternative means to classify these events, but 

we will conduct additional inspections to ensure emergency equipment is in working condition.”

As a result of this finding Kewaunee will move from Column 1 to Column 2 of the 

NRC’s Action Matrix effective the fourth quarter of 2012 leading to a supplemental inspection. 

The inspection will determine if the plant staff has understood the cause of the problems, look at 

the plant’s ability to correctly assess and plan for activities involving emergency preparedness, 

and assess their ability to identify and resolve problems with appropriate priority.

The NRC evaluates a nuclear plant’s performance with a color coded process that 

classifies regulatory findings as green, white, yellow or red, in order of increasing safety 

significance. After consideration of the information the NRC staff has characterized the 

inspection finding as white or as having a low to moderate safety significance.
The company has 30 days to contest the finding. The NRC inspection letter detailing the 

final determination will be publically available through the NRC's website. The number to access 

the letter is ML13094A270.

Even though Dominion announced its decision to decommission the Kewaunee plant, it

currently remains under the NRC’s oversight program for operating reactors. 

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.
#### § 1019.7 Commission notification of foreign governments.

After receiving notification from the exporter, or any changes in notification, the Assistant Executive Director for Compliance shall inform on a priority basis the appropriate government agency of the country to which the noncomplying goods are to be sent of the exportation and the basis on which the goods are banned or fail to comply with Commission standards, regulations, or statutes, and shall send all information supplied by the exporter in accordance with § 1019.4(d). The Assistant Executive Director shall also enclose any information supplied in accordance with § 1019.4(e), but he or she may also state that the Commission disagrees with or takes no position on its content, including its relevance or accuracy. The Assistant Executive Director shall take whatever other action is necessary to provide full information to foreign countries and shall also work with and inform the U.S. State Department and foreign embassies and international organizations, as appropriate. The Assistant Executive Director shall also seek acknowledgment of the notification from the foreign government. Foreign governments intending to prohibit entry of goods that are the subject of a notification from the Commission should initiate action to prevent such entry and should notify the exporter directly of that intent.