alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 922
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

§ 922.215 Permit procedures. ( a ) A person may conduct an activity otherwise prohibited by § 922.213(a)(1) and (2) if conducted under and in accordance with the scope, purpose, terms and conditions of a permit issued under this section and subpart D of this part.
( b ) Applications for such permits should be addressed to the Director, Office of National Marine Sanctuaries; ATTN: Superintendent, Wisconsin Shipwreck Coast National Marine Sanctuary, 1305 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
[88 FR 973, Jan. 6, 2023]
DISMISS and Opinion Filed January 25, 2022 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00496-CV KIMBERLY HENDER SON, Appellant V. RAHMAN PROPERTIES, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Hunt County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC2100183

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Jus tice Molberg, and Justice Smith Opinion by Chief Justice Burns Appellant’s brief was due on December 19, 2021. When it was not filed, we notified appellant by postcard dated December 22, 2021 and di rected her to file her brief, along with a motion to extend time fo r filing the same, by January 3, 2022. We cautioned appellant that the fa ilure to file a brief or an extension motion by that time would result in the appeal being dismissed under rule 38.8(a)(1). To date, appellant has not filed a brief or motion; nor has she communicated with the Court about her appeal.–2– Under these circumstances, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c).

210496F.P05 /Robert D. Burns, III / ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
KIMBERLY HENDERSON, Appellant
No. 05-21-00496-CV V. RAHMAN PROPERTIES, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1, Hunt County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC2100183. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. Justices Molberg and Smith participating. In accordance with this Court’s opi nion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

. Judgment entered January 25, 2022
### SUBCHAPTER I—ALTERNATIVE FUELS—GENERAL
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-2980
THOMAS T. SCAMBOS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JACK G. PETRIE; ROBERT WATSON, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-321-A) Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: April 22, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas T. Scambos, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Teresa Ellen McLaughlin, Gary R. Allen, Annette Marie Wietecha, Anthony Thomas Sheehan, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissingwith prejudice Appellant's action alleging violations of the Internal Revenue Code and denying his motion for relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 52, 59(e). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Scambos v. Petrie ,No. CA-95-321-A (E.D. Va. July 24, 1995; Sept. 12, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Drug Resistance and HIV Infection.                    

*Date:*                         November 23, 2004.                    

*Time:*                         12:30 PM to 1:30 PM.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Rockledge 6700, 6700B Rockledge Drive 3145, Bethesda, MD 20817, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Geetha P. Bansal, PhD., Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, NIAID/NIH/DHHS, Room 3145, 6700-B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 402-5658,                         *gbansal@niaid.nih.gov*.                    
      ( print page 64781)    
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS.)

Dated: October 28, 2004.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-24799  Filed 11-5-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### § 930.84 Continuing State agency objections.

If the State agency objects to the consistency certification for an amended OCS plan, the prohibition in § 930.80 against Federal agency approval of licenses or permits for activities described in detail in such a plan applies, further Secretarial review pursuant to subpart H of this part may take place, and the development of an additional amended OCS plan and consistency certification may be required pursuant to §§ 930.82 through 930.83.
#### Samuel Friedman, Appellant, v. Odora Company, Inc., et al., Respondents.

We find that the three defenses attacked are insufficient in law. (See *Pollitz*V. *Wabash Bailroad Go., No.*1,150 App. Div. 709; *Pollitz*v. *Wabash Bailroad Co., No. 2,*150 App. Div. 715.) Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously modified by granting plaintiff’^ cross motion to dismiss said defenses and by denying examination of plaintiff before trial on item 8 in said order and as so modified affirmed, with $20 costs and dsibursements to the appellant. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
§ 890.1067 Provider contests of proposed penalties and assessments. ( a ) *Contesting proposed sanctions.* A provider may formally contest the proposed penalties and assessments by sending a written notice to the debarring official within 30 days after receiving the notice described in § 890.1066. The debarring official must apply the administrative procedures set forth in §§ 890.1069 and 890.1070 to decide the contest.
( b ) *Contesting debarments and financial sanctions concurrently.* If OPM proposes debarment and penalties and assessments in the same notice, the provider may contest both the debarment and the financial sanctions in the same proceeding. If the provider pursues a combined contest, the requirements set forth in §§ 890.1022 through 890.1024, as well as this section, apply.
( c ) *Settling or compromising proposed sanctions.* The debarring official may settle or compromise proposed sanctions at any time before issuing a final decision under § 890.1070.
Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Law Office of Alexander Sakin, LLC, New York (Alexander Sakin of counsel), for respondent.

Law Office of Alexander Sakin, LLC, New York (Alexander Sakin of counsel), for respondent.

Motion by respondent for an order reinstating him to the practice of law following his suspension by May 2019 order of this Court (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 172 AD3d 1706, 1711 [2019]; see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16).

Upon reading respondent's notice of motion and affidavit with exhibits sworn to August 9, 2019, the October 23, 2019 responsive correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department and respondent's supplemental submission dated November 14, 2019, and having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the Rules of this Court, (2) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (3) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Zerdan], 173 AD3d 1602, 1603 [2019]; Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Serbinowski], 164 AD3d 1049, 1050 [2018]), it is

ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effectively immediately.

Garry, P.J., Lynch, Mulvey and Aarons, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 23, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 68153]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25903]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel Unsolicited Program Project (PO1) 
Application.
    Date: December 14, 2004.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge 6700B Rockledge 
Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: John A. Bogdan, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge 
Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-496-2550, 
[email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 15, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-25903 Filed 11-22-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
No. IV-11-033

Contact: Victor Dricks (817) 860-8128

 Lara Uselding (817) 276-6519

July 11, 2011 

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

NRC ISSUES $3,500 FINE AND CONFIRMATORY ORDER

TO BOZEMAN DEACONESS HOSPITAL

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a $3,500 fine and Confirmatory 

Order to the Bozeman Deaconess Hospital in Bozeman, Mont., for security violations involving 

radioactive materials stored at its medical lab.

The violations were identified during an unannounced NRC inspection at the hospital on 

January 27, 2010. NRC determined hospital officials willfully failed to secure radioactive 

materials from unauthorized removal or access and failed to control and maintain constant 

surveillance of radioactive material as required. These violations contributed to the loss of a vial 

containing a small quantity of samarium-153, which is prescribed to patients with metastatic 

bone lesions who are having bone pain.

The NRC determined willfulness was involved because hospital employees, including the 

radiation safety officer, had previously raised concerns about lab security, but hospital managers 

did not adequately address these.

Hospital officials were given a choice of a pre-decisional enforcement conference, at 

which the issues would be discussed with NRC officials, or Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) 

which uses a mediator to resolve issues. They chose ADR and a mediation session was held on 

May 25 at NRC’s Region IV offices in Arlington, Texas.

As a result of mediation, the hospital has agreed to (1) pay a $3,500 fine; (2) hire a thirdparty organization to train hospital staff and managers on enforcement actions NRC can take for 

deliberate misconduct; (3) establish more effective training programs for staff; and (4) 

implement procedures to encourage workers to raise radiation safety concerns.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV

612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400

Arlington, TX 76011-4125

Telephone: (817) 860-8128

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov
The NRC’s letter to the hospital, its enclosures and the licensee’s response will be made 

available to the public through the agency’s electronic reading room at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/html. Help in finding these documents is available from 

the NRC Public Document Room at 1-800-397-4209.

##

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.
### SUBCHAPTER I–A—INSTITUTIONALIZED PERSONS
COALITION PROVISIONAL AUTHORITY

BAGHDAD, IRAQ

PUBLIC NOTICE

REGARDING ORGANIZATION IN THE WORKPLACE

June 6, 2003

The Administrator of the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) hereby advises all

citizens, residents of, and temporary workers in Iraq of the following information

concerning organizations in the workplace.

To the extent consistent with its obligation to maintain security and civil order, the

Coalition Provisional Authority respects Iraqi laws. This extends to Iraqi labor

laws prescribing the conditions under which employees of government

instrumentalities and enterprises continue to work under the CPA on behalf of the

people of Iraq. Although Iraqi labor permits these employees to elect their

representatives, the law does not authorize employee elections of Directors or

Directing Staff of government instrumentalities and enterprises.

Therefore, the CPA will not recognize the election of Directors, or otherwise allow

interference with managerial prerogatives of the Directing Staff of government

instrumentalities and enterprises. The CPA will authorize appropriate changes in

government Directing Staffs when warranted by reason of poor performance,

corruption, security requirements, or as part of the De-Baathification process.

The form of industrial and labor relations ultimately will be a matter for the Iraqi

people and the future Iraqi government to decide.
ONLINE REGISTRATION OPEN FOR FUEL CYCLE INFORMATION EXCHANGE, 

JUNE 11-12, 2013 IN ROCKVILLE, MD

Online registration is open for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s 8th Annual Fuel Cycle 

Information Exchange (FCIX), to be held June 11-12 at the agency’s headquarters in Rockville, Md.

NRC Chairman Allison Macfarlane will deliver a keynote address on June 11. The

conference will include discussions and presentations on post-Fukushima regulatory requirements, 

operating experience, cumulative effects of regulation, security and new construction. 

The FCIX will run from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. each day, in the NRC Auditorium. Visitors will need 

to enter at the agency’s One White Flint North building, 11555 Rockville Pike, in Rockville. More 

information about the conference, including online registration, is available at the NRC website.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 13-024 April 8, 2013
NRC TO DISCUSS INDUSTRY’S POST-FUKUSHIMA EFFORTS

SEPT. 21 IN ROCKVILLE, MD.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with nuclear power plant industry 

representatives on Wednesday, Sept. 21, to discuss the industry’s plans and proposed actions to 

address the lessons learned from the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear accident.

The meeting will run from 1-3:30 p.m. in the Commission Meeting Room on the first 

floor of One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike in Rockville. The NRC staff will consider 

the industry’s feedback as they prepare a proposal to prioritize recommendations from the 

agency’s Near-Term Task Force. The Commission has asked the staff to provide its prioritization 

proposal by Oct. 3.

Additional information regarding the meeting, including expected participants and a more 

detailed agenda, will be available on the NRC’s public meeting schedule. The meeting will be 

webcast, and a toll-free teleconference will also be available. Members of the public may ask 

questions of the NRC staff before the meeting ends; those interested in teleconference 

information should contact Amy Bonaccorso at RST01_F.Resource@nrc.gov for instructions.

###

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand.

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-173 September 15, 2011
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6370

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ERNEST MELVIN TUCKER, a/k/a Sonny Tucker,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief

District Judge. (CR-95-11, CA-00-108-3)

Submitted: July 2, 2002 Decided: July 15, 2002

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ernest Melvin Tucker, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow,

Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Ernest Melvin Tucker seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. See United States v. Tucker, Nos. CR-95-11; CA-00-

108-3 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 28, 2002). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
PRARI AND RUSSIAN REGIONAL AGRIBUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES

----

**February 1999**
by Joan Morgan
U.S. agribusiness companies interested in doing business in Russia's regions should know about the U.S.Agency for International Development's (USAID) Program to Revitalize Agriculture through RegionalInvestment (PRARI).  The program's mission is to (1) promote policy and institutional changes, and (2) facilitateagribusiness trade and investment between prospective U.S. and Russian partners.  According to Christian Foster,an agribusiness adviser at USAID, PRARI is now focusing on bringing U.S. and Russian agribusiness companiestogether through two agribusiness investment missions to Russia in 1999 as a part of its continuing work in theregions.
**PRARI**