alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC UNVEILS NEW WEB DESIGN THAT ENHANCES USABILITY 

AND ADDS NEW FEATURES

A redesign of the NRC’s public website was formally unveiled today following 

comprehensive testing over the weekend to ensure that all new features work as intended. This is 

the first significant Web update since 2001.

“This newly redesigned website reflects the agency’s dedication to using new technology to 

improve openness, transparency, and public outreach,” said Chairman Gregory B. Jaczko. “The new 

design includes upgrades and changes suggested by the public through online surveys, interviews,

and focus groups held around the country.”

The redesign improves navigation, content, and accessibility – all of which allow users to 

locate information quickly and easily. It employs best practices in Web design and includes features 

allowing users to be notified of updated content. The redesign also includes an updated Facility 

Locator that uses Google maps and leads easily to facility-specific information.

The redesign also features the following additions and enhancements:

• “Reporting a Safety Concern” is prominently located on the home page;

• Rotating slides on the home page highlight major areas of interest;

• A new interactive calendar allows quick access to the latest NRC public meetings;

• A new “Spotlight” replaces the Key Topics on the home page, and now is available 

on each page of the site;

• Consistent navigation in the header and footer areas aids users in moving through the 

site; and

• A scrolling Emergency Alert banner is activated when necessary.

Visitors are encouraged to provide feedback on the redesign by posting a comment on the 

NRC Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov/. 

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-065 April 18, 2011
NO. 73,429 

### °5- 13-l<6Zi*.'CXL

FILED IN COURT OF APPEALS

JUN 2 11999 

## IN THE COURT OF CRIMINALAPP^ALS OF TEXAS

EX PARTE ANTHONY CARL TURNER, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS FROM DALLAS COUNTY The opinion was delivered per curiam.
OPINION This is a post-conviction application for a writ ofhabeas corpus forwarded to this Court pursuant to Article 11.07, V.A.C.C.P. Applicant was convicted ofthe offense of burglary ofa vehicle, and punishment was assessed at ninety-nine years imprisonment. This conviction was affirmed. Turner v. State. No. 05-93-01826-CR (Tex. App.— Dallas, delivered June 5,1996, no pet.). Applicant contends that he was denied an opportunity to file a petitionfor

### discretionary review because his appellate attorney did not timely notify him that his conviction had been affirmed. The trial court could not determine that Applicant was aware that his conviction had been affirmed in time to file a petitionfordiscretionary review andrecommended that reliefbe granted. We agree with the trial court's recommendation. 

### Habeas corpus reliefis granted, and Applicant is granted leave to file an out-of

### time petition for discretionary review from his conviction in cause numberF93-60164- HL from the Criminal District CourtNumber 5of Dallas County. Applicant is ordered 

### returnedto the point atwhich he can file ameaningful petition for discretionary review. 

### Forpurposes ofthe Texas Rules ofAppellate Procedure, all time limits shall be calculated as ifthe Court of Appeals' decision hadbeenrendered onthe day the mandate of this Court issues. We holdthat should Applicant desire to seek discretionary review, 

### he musttake affirmative steps to see thathis petition is filed inthe Court ofAppeals 

### within thirty days ofthe date the mandate ofthis Courthas issued. DELIVERED: June 16, 1999 DO NOT PUBLISHCourt of Criminal appeals Pox 12308 Capitol Station &u£Stm,tea£f 787XX & ^«5 "CO

>>~. * .%,<•——srrr ya ' A 0.1 POSTAGE

l[i<<' : -„,. \- ;V*|
• d j ; ; / * : -"! i 0 2 6 2,

LISA ROMBOK CLERK 5TH COURT OF APPEALS 

### COURTHOUSE 60 0 COMMERCE 2ND FLOOR DALLAS TX 7 52 02 73,429

M75282 U„Ui,l«iMUmiilil««»H
§ 950.6 Environmental Science Information Center (ESIC). ESIC is NOAA's information specialist, librarian, and publisher. ESIC coordinates NOAA's library and information services and its participation in the national network of scientific information centers and libraries. Computerized literature searches provide information from over 80 data bases. The complete list of data bases is available on request. All ESIC information facilities provide the normal library tailored information and reference services. As NOAA's publisher of scientific and technical information, ESIC reviews, edits, and processes NOAA manuscripts for publication. ( a ) Services available from ESIC include: ( 1 ) *Reference services.* Some services are provided on a cost-recovery basis to non-NOAA individuals.
( 2 ) *Publication copy services.* Copies of NOAA publications are provided on request from qualified users, including governments, universities, non-profit organizations, professional societies, chambers of commerce, public information media, and individuals and organizations having cooperative or exchange agreements with NOAA.
( 3 ) *Bibliographies.* Special bibliographies are prepared on request. When provided to non-NOAA individuals, service is on a full cost-recovery basis.
( 4 ) *Current awareness services.* Periodically provides announcements of titles of newly published NOAA scientific and technical publications.
( 5 ) *Lending services.* Materials are loaned to other libraries and to NOAA employees.
( 6 ) On-site use of library collections.
( 7 ) *Publishing services.* Includes providing refereeing, reviewing, editing, and publishing services for NOAA authors of manuscripts destined for both NOAA and non-NOAA publication series.
( b ) Queries should be addressed to: Environmental Science Information Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Rockville, MD 20852, tel. 301-443-8137.
Timeline (estimated) for NRC External Safety Culture Initiative 

Milestone Date 

1. Hold weekly 2 hr. meetings with NRC 

program offices to review public comments 

on the SC policy statement April-June 2010 

2. NRC program offices perform outreach 

activities to promote awareness of NRC SC 

effort May-November 2010 

3. SC Steering Committee meetings every 8 

weeks May 2010-January 2011 

4. INPO validation study/ RES confirmatory 

analysis July – September, 2010 

5. Potentially conduct public meeting in Las 

Vegas, NV September, 2010 

6. Issue meeting summary for public meeting October, 2010 

7. Issue FRN to provided: 1) final revision of 

draft SCPS definition/traits, and 2) 

opportunity for comment. September– October, 2010 

8. Analyze public comments from FRN and 

outreach; develop final revision to the SCPS October, 2010 

9. Send out draft final SCPS for office review 

and concurrence October 2010 - January, 2011 

10. Commission Memo: final SCPS (WITS 2009-

00132/SECY-2009-0297) January 31, 2011
#### § 265.21 Improper use of roads as thoroughfares.

Except as otherwise provided herein, no person shall drive a motor vehicle or bicycle onto the site for the sole purpose of using the roads of the site as a thoroughfare between roads bordering the site. This section shall not apply to bicyclists using officially approved bike paths on the site.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of EMPS Research Corporation,
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, James Gunnell, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



Date: November 15, 2004

/s/ James Gunnell
-----------------------------
James Gunnell,
Principal Financial Officer
# L_2021067EN.01002201.xml

| 25.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 67/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 67/22

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 134/2018

of 6 July 2018

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2021/196]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/295 of 15 December 2017 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) No 44/2014, as regards vehicle construction and general requirements, and Delegated Regulation (EU) No 134/2014, as regards environmental and propulsion unit performance requirements for the approval of two- or three-wheel vehicles and quadricycles (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/295 of 15 December 2017 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) No 44/2014, as regards vehicle construction and general requirements, and Delegated Regulation (EU) No 134/2014, as regards environmental and propulsion unit performance requirements for the approval of two- or three-wheel vehicles and quadricycles (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in points 46b (Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 44/2014) and 46d (Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 134/2014) of Chapter I of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32018 R 0295: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/295 of 15 December 2017 (OJ L 56, 28.2.2018, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32018 R 0295: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/295 of 15 December 2017 (OJ L 56, 28.2.2018, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/295 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 7 July 2018, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 6 July 2018.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda Helen SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 56, 28.2.2018, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 25, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41845

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SILVIO DUNEZ-DE GRANDE,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:05-CR-646-ALL

--------------------

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Silvio Dunez-De Grande appeals from his guilty-plea

conviction of, and sentence for, violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326 by

being found in the United States without permission after

deportation. He argues, in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530

U.S. 466 (2000), that the 70-month term of imprisonment imposed

in his case exceeds the statutory maximum sentence allowed for

the § 1326(a) offense charged in his indictment. He challenges

the constitutionality of § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony
No. 05-41845

-2-

and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather

than elements of the offense that must be found by a jury. 

Dunez-De Grande’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). 

Although he contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly

decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule

Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi, we have repeatedly

rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres

remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268,

276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Dunez-De

Grande properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light

of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here

to preserve it for further review.

AFFIRMED.
### §543. Method of disposition

An executive agency designated or authorized by the Administrator of General Services to dispose of surplus property may do so by sale, exchange, lease, permit, or transfer, for cash, credit, or other property, with or without warranty, on terms and conditions that the Administrator considers proper. The agency may execute documents to transfer title or other interest in the property and may take other action it considers necessary or proper to dispose of the property under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1086.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 543 | 40:484(c). | June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title II, §203(c), 63 Stat. 385. |

Section
#### Harold W. Thomas, Respondent, v. Fred Colbath, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1321 CA 14-00904**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ.

NEIL LOVELESS AND PAULA MANNING, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

V ORDER

PAUL KOENIG, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

ROBERT J. LUNN, ROCHESTER, AND FRANK A. ALOI, FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.

TADROS LAW OFFICE, P.C., SYRACUSE (SHADIA TADROS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Wayne County (Dennis M. Kehoe, A.J.), entered August 19, 2013. The interlocutory judgment declared the rights of the parties with respect to certain real property.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

Entered: January 2, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
### Part 1—Responsibilities of National Institute of Mental Health

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 100–607, title I, §142(c)(2)(C), (D), Nov. 4, 1988, 102 Stat. 3057, redesignated part 2 as 1 and struck out former part 1 heading "Responsibilities of National Institute on Aging".
AMENDMENT
      NO. 1 TO SEVERANCE AGREEMENT

     

    AMENDMENT
      NO. 1 TO THE SEVERANCE AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) made as of the 3rd
      day of
      August, 2007 by and between GRIFFON CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
      (hereinafter the “Company”) and PATRICK ALESIA (hereinafter the
“Executive”).

     

    WITNESSETH:

     

    WHEREAS,
      the Company and Executive entered into a Severance Agreement dated July 18,
      2006
      (hereinafter the “Severance Agreement”); and

     

    WHEREAS,
      the Company and Executive desire to modify the said Severance Agreement to
      comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue
      Code.

     

    NOW,
      THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:

     

    
      	 	
              1.

            	
              All
                references to 35 percent with regard to an amount of voting securities
                or
                outstanding stock in Section 2.1 shall henceforth be read to mean
                30
                percent, effective as of the date
                hereof.

            


    

     

    
      	 	
              2.

            	
              A
                new sentence shall be added after the first sentence of Section 4.3,
                which
                shall read in its entirety as follows, effective as of the date
                hereof:

            


    

     

    
      	 	 	
              “Any
                such claims for reimbursement of a proper medical or health expense
                shall
                be paid as soon as administratively feasible following the proper
                submission of such expense; provided however, that all such claims
                must be
                submitted and paid by the end of the year following the year in which
                such
                expense is incurred.” 

            


    

     

    
      	 	
              3.

            	
              Except
                as specifically provided in and modified by this Amendment, the Severance
                Agreement is in all other respects hereby ratified and confirmed
                and
                references to the Severance Agreement shall be deemed to refer to
                the
                Severance Agreement as modified by this
                Amendment.

            


    

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        
        

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    

     

    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of the day
      and
      year first above written.

    
      	 	 	 
	 	GRIFFON
              CORPORATION
	 
 	 
 	 
 
	
            	By:  	/s/ Eric P. Edelstein
	 	
              

            
	 	 
	 	/s/ Patrick L. Alesia
	 	
              
Patrick
              Alesia


    

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        2
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 224 (Monday, November 22, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 67944]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25846]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Electronic Industries Alliance

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 16, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Electronic Industries 
Alliance (``EIA'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with 
the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) 
the name and principal place of business of the standards development 
organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development 
activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: Electronic 
Industries Alliance, Arlington, VA. The nature and scope of EIA's 
standards development activities are: The development and maintenance 
of voluntary industry standards and related documents, formulation of 
positions for presentation on behalf of the United States in 
international standards fora, and preparation of technical information 
and reports for use by industry and government, on behalf of 
manufacturers of electronic products and providers of services to said 
manufacturers and consumers.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-25846 Filed 11-19-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
```
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Mark H. McKinnies, as Chief Financial Officer of ADA-Es, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)        the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)        the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Mark H. McKinnies
|Name:                 |  | Mark H. McKinnies      
|Title:                |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:                 |  | November 12, 2010
#### In the Matter of Mercia Bascombe, Appellant, v John Bascombe, Respondent.

[819 NYS2d 472]

In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the wife appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Cammer, J.H.O.), dated June 10, 2005, which, after a hearing, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the petition is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Kings County, for a dispositional hearing and the entry of an appropriate order of disposition.

The Family Court, after conducting a hearing, dismissed the wife’s family offense petition in which she sought an order of protection against her husband, finding that she did not establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, that a family offense had occurred. We find, however, that the Family Court erred in not giving collateral estoppel effect to the husband’s conviction, upon his plea of guilty, to harassment in the second degree, a class A misdemeanor, which arose out of the same facts which formed the basis of the family offense petition *(see Lili B. v Henry F.,*235 AD2d 512 [1997]; *Colby v Crocitto,*207 AD2d 764 [1994]; *Hooks v Middlebrooks,*99 AD2d 663 [1984]). Thus, we reinstate the petition and remit the matter to the Family Court, *471Kings County, for a dispositional hearing and the entry of an appropriate order of disposition. Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Luciano and Covello, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
                               U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      In connection with the report of ProUroCare Medical Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
P. Grossman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Richard Thon, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.

/s/ Michael P. Grossman
--------------------------
Michael P. Grossman
Chief Executive Officer

November 15, 2004

/s/ Richard Thon
---------------------------
Richard Thon
Chief Financial Officer

November 15, 2004

                                       28