alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No: 14-009 February 21, 2014

CONTACT: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200 

NRC Seeks Public Comment on Draft Environmental Report for 

Callaway Nuclear Plant License Renewal – Meetings Scheduled for March 19

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission seeks public comment on a draft report assessing the 

environmental impacts of extending the operating license for the Callaway nuclear power plant in 

Fulton, Mo.

The Callaway plant is a single pressurized water reactor and is licensed to operate through Oct. 

18, 2024. Union Electric Co., a subsidiary of Ameren Missouri, applied on Dec. 15, 2011, to renew the 

license for an additional 20 years. 

The draft environmental impact statement contains the NRC staff’s preliminary finding that the 

environmental impacts of license renewal would not preclude renewing the license. This finding is 

based on the analysis and findings in the agency’s generic environmental impact statement on license 

renewal, the environmental report submitted by Ameren, consultation with federal, state and local 

agencies, the NRC staff’s own independent review, and the staff’s consideration of public comments.

The NRC staff will hold two public meetings March 19 at the Fulton City Hall, 18 East 4th St., 

in Fulton, to present the report’s findings and receive comments from the public. The first session will 

run from 2-3:30 p.m., and the second from 7-8:30 p.m. Comments may also be submitted over the 

federal rulemakings website at www.regulations.gov , using Docket ID NRC-2012-0001, or mailed to 

Cindy Bladey, Chief, Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch (RADB), Office of 

Administration, Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-44M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 

20555-0001. Comments will be accepted through April 7.

The draft environmental impact statement for the Callaway plant license renewal (NUREG1437, supplement 51), along with information on the staff’s review of the license renewal application, 

is available on the NRC website.
STATEMENT OF NRC CHAIRMAN GREGORY B. JACZKO 

ON VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will issue a Demand For Information (DFI) to 

Entergy to determine what, if any, regulatory actions are necessary regarding the Vermont 

Yankee nuclear plant. In accordance with our Enforcement Policy, the NRC staff will issue the 

DFI to Entergy to provide information under oath to allow us to make this determination. This 

step is being taken in response to Entergy’s investigation of their interactions with the State of 

Vermont. 

Earlier this month I told the Vermont Congressional delegation that the NRC would 

closely monitor the developments at Vermont Yankee. Once Entergy responds, the NRC will 

assess and independently verify the information provided to ascertain the implications on NRCregulated safety activities and the impact on safety culture at the site. The NRC will determine 

whether it needs to take any further action. 

This is the latest of several steps that the NRC has taken on this matter. Senior personnel 

will soon arrive at Vermont Yankee to verify assertions and information that Entergy has 

provided regarding its recent licensing activities. In addition, the NRC has sent a Region I 

manager to the site to provide additional oversight, augmenting the NRC Resident Inspectors 

assigned to Vermont Yankee. 

I will see to it that the NRC takes every measure necessary to independently assure that 

the health and safety of the public and the environment is protected at Vermont Yankee. 

 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-036 February 24, 2010
#### § 970.210 Reasonable time for full compliance.

Priority of right will not be lost in case of any application filed which is in substantial but not full compliance, as specified in § 970.209, if the Administrator determines that the applicant, within 60 days after issuance to the applicant by the Administrator of written notice that the application is in substantial but not full compliance, has brought the application into full compliance with the requirements of §§ 970.201 through 970.208.

[46 FR 45898, Sept. 15, 1981; 47 FR 5966, Feb. 9, 1982]
Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

MANDATE

TO THE 283RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF DALLAS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas, on the 18th day of December, 2017, 

the cause on appeal to revise or reverse the judgment between

ROCKY CORONADO, Appellant

No. 05-16-01004-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F14-56962-T.

Opinion delivered by Justice Myers. 

Justices Francis and Whitehill participating.

was determined; and this Court made its order in these words:

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is MODIFIED to 

include an affirmative family violence finding. As MODIFIED, the judgment is AFFIRMED.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of the Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth District of Texas, in this behalf, and have it duly obeyed and executed.

WITNESS the HON. CAROLYN WRIGHT, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals, with 

the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Dallas, this 6th day of June, 2018.

5 L M

LISA MATZ, Clerk
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                         302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT



I, Bertram Cutler, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  annual  report on Form  10-KSB of  Global Assets &
Services, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: September 20, 2004


/s/ Bertram Cutler
-----------------------
Bertram Cutler, President &
Acting CFO
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# FSME-13-019 - Notification of Availability of Standardized Presentation on Safety Culture Policy Statement for Use by Agreement States.

Accession Number: ML13002A179

Date Released: Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML13002A181 - FSME-13-019 - Notification of Availability of Standardized Presentation on Safety Culture Policy Statement for Use by Agreement. (3 page(s), 2/6/2013)
    - ML13002A203 - FSME-13-019 - Safety Culture Presentation for Agreement States. (27 page(s), 2/6/2013)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
EXHIBIT 31.1  CERTIFICATION  I, Liankuan Yang certify that:  1.
        I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Gold Horse International, Inc.;
  2.
        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3.
        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
  4.
        The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
  (a)
        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  (b)
        Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
  (c)
        Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting;
  5.
        The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  (a)
        All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
  (b)
        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Liankuan Yang Name: Liankuan Yang Title: Chief Executive Officer. principal executive officer  Dated: August 1, 2008
No: II-13-050 August 19, 2013

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416

NRC Schedules Meeting to Discuss Status of Major Projects at Oconee Nuclear Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled a public meeting for Wednesday, Aug. 28, 

with Duke Energy officials to discuss the status of major projects at the Oconee nuclear power plant.

The Oconee plant, operated by Duke, is near Seneca, S.C., about 30 miles west of Greenville.

The meeting will start at 12:30 p.m. EDT at the NRC's Region II offices, 245 Peachtree Center 

Ave., NE, Suite 1200, in Atlanta. The public is invited to attend, and NRC officials will answer 

questions from the public after the business portion of the meeting. Some portions of the meeting may 

be closed to the public if security-related information is discussed.

The projects to be discussed include pending plant improvements designed to prevent or 

mitigate the effects of floods or tornadoes. There will also be discussions about work related to the 

plant’s transition to different fire protection standards as well as enhancements to improve Oconee’s 

ability to cope with possible equipment failures.
### **CHAPTER 6—PRIVATE CARRIAGE OF LETTERS**

Sec.
601.
Letters carried out of the mail.
602.
Foreign letters out of the mails.
603.
Searches authorized.
604.
Seizing and detaining letters.
605.
Searching vessels for letters.
606.
Disposition of seized mail.
### §7104. Contractor's right of appeal from decision by contracting officer

(a) Appeal to Agency Board.—A contractor, within 90 days from the date of receipt of a contracting officer's decision under section 7103 of this title, may appeal the decision to an agency board as provided in section 7105 of this title.

(b) Bringing an Action De Novo in Federal Court.—

(1) In general.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), and in lieu of appealing the decision of a contracting officer under section 7103 of this title to an agency board, a contractor may bring an action directly on the claim in the United States Court of Federal Claims, notwithstanding any contract provision, regulation, or rule of law to the contrary.

(2) Tennessee valley authority.—In the case of an action against the Tennessee Valley Authority, the contractor may only bring an action directly on the claim in a district court of the United States pursuant to section 1337 of title 28, notwithstanding any contract provision, regulation, or rule of law to the contrary.

(3) Time for filing.—A contractor shall file any action under paragraph (1) or (2) within 12 months from the date of receipt of a contracting officer's decision under section 7103 of this title.

(4) De novo.—An action under paragraph (1) or (2) shall proceed de novo in accordance with the rules of the appropriate court.

(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3820.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 7104(a) | 41:606. | Pub. L. 95–563, §7, Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2385. |
| 7104(b) | 41:609(a). | Pub. L. 95–563, §10(a), Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2388; Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §161(10), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 49. |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "of contract appeals" are omitted as unnecessary because of the definition of "agency board" in section 7101 of the revised title.

In subsection (b)(1), the words "United States Court of Federal Claims" are substituted for "United States Claims Court" because of section 902(b)(1) of the Federal Courts Administration Act of 1992 (Pub. L. 102–572, 106 Stat. 4516, 28 U.S.C. 171 note).
**Exhibit 31.1**

Certification ofChief Executive Officer

I, Richard A.Smith, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, as amended, of Eschelon Telecom, Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4.     The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)              designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)             evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)              disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors:

a)              all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)             any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
|        | November 13, 2006 |
|--------|-------------------|
|   |              |   |
|   |              |   |
|   | Sign:             | /S/        Richard  A. Smith |   |
|   |              | Richard A. Smith |   |
|   |              | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region III

2443 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. III-13-003

Contact: Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil (630) 829-9663

January 29, 2013

E-Mail: OPA3.RegionIII@nrc.gov 

NRC NAMES NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR AT 

DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has selected Tom Briley as the 

new Resident Inspector at the Davis-Besse nuclear power plant in Oak 

Harbor, Ohio, approximately 20 miles southeast of Toledo. The nuclear 

power facility is operated by FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co.

Each commercial nuclear power plant site in the United States has at 

least two Resident Inspectors who monitor day-to-day operations at the 

plant. Briley joins Senior NRC Resident Inspector Dan Kimble at the 

Davis-Besse facility.

“Tom Briley’s background and regulatory experience will assist the NRC in carrying out 

its mission of protecting people and the environment and ensuring the safe operation of nuclear 

power plants,” said Region III Administrator Charles Casto.

Briley received his bachelor’s degree in 2008 and his master’s degree in 2009, both in 

nuclear engineering and radiological sciences from the University of Michigan. 

Following graduation, he joined the NRC in 2009 as a reactor engineer in the Nuclear 

Safety Professional Development Program and graduated in 2011. After successfully completing 

the agency’s inspector qualification program, he served as acting Resident Inspector at Dresden 

nuclear power plant in Illinois.

The NRC Resident Inspectors have offices at the Davis-Besse plant and can be reached at 

(419) 244-4494.

###

NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
§ 1052.3 Conduct of oral presentation. ( a ) The purpose of the oral presentation is to afford interested persons an opportunity to participate in person in the Commission's rulemaking or other proceedings and to help inform the Commission of relevant data, views and arguments.
( b ) The oral presentation, which shall be taped or transcribed, shall be an informal, non-adversarial legislative-type proceeding at which there will be no formal pleadings or adverse parties.
( c ) The proceedings for the oral presentation shall be conducted impartially, thoroughly, and expeditiously to allow interested persons an opportunity for oral presentation of data, views or arguments.
Editorial Note on Part 8b
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 8b appear at 68 FR 51353, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 8b.21 Treatment of students. ( a ) *General.* No qualified handicapped student shall, on the basis of handicap, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any academic research, occupational training, housing, health insurance, counseling, financial aid, physical education, athletics, recreation, transportation, other extracurricular, or other post secondary education aid, benefits, or services to which this subpart applies.
( b ) A recipient to which this subpart applies that considers participation by students in education programs or activities not operated wholly by the recipient as part of, or equivalent to, education programs or activities operated by the recipient shall assure itself that the other education program or activity, as a whole, provides an equal opportunity for the participation of qualified handicapped persons.
( c ) A recipient to which this subpart applies may not, on the basis of handicap exclude any qualified handicapped student from any course or study, or other part of its education program or activity.
( d ) A recipient to which this subpart applies shall operate its program or activity in the most integrated setting appropriate.