alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 17, 2004)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 67297]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25513]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 04-3444; MB Docket No. 04-378; RM-11079]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Lake Charles, LA and West Orange, TX

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; dismissal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: At the request of Apex Broadcasting, Inc., the Audio Division 
dismisses the petition for rule making proposing the reallotment of 
Channel 258C0 from Lake Charles, Louisiana to West Orange, Texas, and 
the modification of Station KBXG(FM)'s license accordingly. See 69 FR 
60344, October 8, 2004. A showing of continuing interest is required 
before a channel will be allotted. It is the Commission's policy to 
refrain from making an allotment to a community absent an expression of 
interest. Therefore, we will grant the request to withdraw the instant 
proposal.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon P. McDonald, Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MB Docket No. 04-378, adopted October 27, 2004, and 
released October 29, 2004. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Information Center (Room CY-A257), 445 12th Street, 
SW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and 
Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, 
Washington, DC 20054, telephone 1-800-378-3160 or www.BCPIWEB.com. This 
document is not subject to the Congressional Review Act. (The 
Commission is, therefore, not required to submit a copy of this Report 
and Order to GAO, pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 
U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) because the proposed rule was dismissed.)

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 04-25513 Filed 11-16-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Editorial Note on Part 15
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 15 appear at 62 FR 19669, Apr. 23, 1997.

§ 15.11 Scope. ( a ) This subpart sets forth the policies and procedures to be followed with respect to the production or disclosure of the testimony of employees and former employees of the Department of Commerce as witnesses in legal proceedings and the production or disclosure of information contained in Department of Commerce documents, or any information acquired by any person while such person was an employee of the Department of Commerce, for use in legal proceedings pursuant to a request, order, or subpoena (collectively referred to in this subpart as a “demand”). No Department employee or former employee shall comply with such a demand without the prior authorization of the General Counsel or appropriate agency counsel, in accordance with this subpart.
( b ) This subpart does not apply to any legal proceeding in which an employee is to testify while on leave status, regarding facts or events unrelated to the official business of the Department or the duties of the employee.
( c ) This subpart does not apply to any legal proceeding in which the Department is a party or to subpoenas for testimony or documents received from Congress, a Federal agency Inspector General, or a Special Prosecutor.
( d ) This subpart does not apply to any demand for testimony of employees and former employees of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or to demands for the production of USPTO documents. The process for any demand for testimony of an employee or for the production of documents of the USPTO can be found at 37 CFR 104.21 through 104.24, and any such demands must be sent directly to the USPTO.
( e ) This subpart in no way affects the rights and procedures governing public access to records pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, the Privacy Act, or the Trade Secrets Act or other Federal law restricting the disclosure of information. Moreover, demands in legal proceedings for the production of records, or for the testimony of Department employees regarding information protected by the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a, the Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. 1905, Census data under Title 13, U.S.C., or other confidentiality statutes, must satisfy the requirements for disclosure set forth in those statutes, if any, before the records may be provided or testimony given. The General Counsel or appropriate agency counsel should first determine if there is a legal basis to provide the testimony or records sought under applicable confidentiality statutes before applying the procedures established in this subpart.
( f ) This subpart is not intended to be relied upon to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by any party against the United States.
[87 FR 162, Jan. 4, 2022]
### §122. National Flag Week

The President is requested to issue each year a proclamation—

(1) designating the week in which June 14 falls as National Flag Week; and

(2) calling on citizens to display the flag of the United States during National Flag Week.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1259.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 122 | 36:157a. | June 9, 1966, Pub. L. 89–443, 80 Stat. 194. |

Section
### Part D—Strengthening Capacity for Basic Nurse Education and Practice

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior part D related to scholarship grants to schools of nursing and consisted of sections 298c to 298c–8, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 105–392.
## Attachment 2: Missouri SO 2 

## Monitoring Summary (As of 4/4/16)

http://dnr.mo.gov/env/apcp/docs/so2monitoringdata.pdf
Exhibit
32.3





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I,
Anthony J. Branca, Chief Financial Officer of ICON Capital Corp., the Manager of
the Registrant, in connection with the Quarterly Report of ICON Income Fund Ten,
LLC (the “LLC”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly
Report”) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.
            The
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the LLC.











Date: May
15, 2009





/s/Anthony J.
Branca__


Anthony
J. Branca


Chief
Financial Officer


ICON
Capital Corp.


Manager
of ICON Income Fund Ten,
LLC
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 

 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

))))))))))))))))))))))))

No. 97-30866

))))))))))))))))))))))))

PHYLLIS ROMAGUERA; ET AL

Plaintiffs,

V.

PHYLLIS ROMAGUERA

Plaintiff -Appellee,

v.

JON GEGENHEIMER, Clerk of Court, 24th Judicial District, Court Ex

Officio Recorder of Mortgages and Conveyances, Parish of Jefferson,

State of Louisiana; ET AL

Defendants

JON GEGENHEIMER, Clerk of Court, 24th Judicial District Court, Ex

Officio Recorder of Mortgages and Conveyances, Parish of Jefferson,

State of Louisiana

Defendant - Appellant 

))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Louisiana, New Orleans

))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

March 5, 1999

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion 12/24/98, 5 Cir., ________, ________ F.3d ________)

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, JONES and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 
 Treating the Petition for Rehearing En Banc BY APPELLANT JON

GEGENHEIMER as a Petition for Panel Rehearing, the Petition for

Panel Rehearing is DENIED. No member of the Panel nor judge in

regular active service of the court having requested that the court

be polled on Rehearing En Banc (FED.R.APP.P. and 5

th CIR. R.35), the

petition for Rehearing En Banc by BY APPELLANT JOH GEGENHEIMER is

DENIED. 

However, to clarify the opinion, we are substituting the last

paragraph on page 6 with the following paragraph.

We hold that the district court’s acknowledgment of

Romaguera’s request served to notify opposing counsel of

the request, thereby satisfying Congress’ intended

purpose under Rule 54(d)(2). Had the district court

refrained from giving the impression that a hearing would

be scheduled by the court, Romaguera would have been

required to file the motion under Rule 54(d)(2). As a

consequence of the court’s acknowledgment of the request,

together with its indication in its order that a hearing

would be held thereon, however, a filing was not needed

and the subsequent filing by Romaguera simply served as

a reminder to the court that it had failed to set a

hearing date.
### Part B—Grants for State and Community Programs for Children, Youth, and Families
Order entered November 12 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00918
- CV TE LUN WANG, Appellant

V. XIANGYU CAO, RUOTIAN LI, SI HAN , AND LINGCHAO CHEN, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429
- 04995
- 2017



### O RDER By order dated October 10, 2019, we ordered this appeal be submitted without the reporter’s record. Before the Court is appellant’s Novem ber 6, 2019 motion for lea ve to respond to the October 10 th order

. We GRANT the motion as follows:
We VACATE this Court’s order dated October 10, 2019. Appellant has requested and paid the fee for the reporter’s records for the following hearings : 1. Decemb er 15, 201 7

- recorded by Deputy Reporter Brenda Varela;
2. April 12, 2018

- recorded by Deputy Reporter LaTresta Ginyard; and
3. August 3, 2018

- recorded by Deputy Reporter La Toya Young

- Martinez.
A lthough a ppellant states in her motion that the “transcripts” of the December 15th and April 12th hearings have been “delivered”, no reporter’s records have been filed in this appeal. Thereporter’s record of the December 15th hearing was filed in a prior appeal in appellate cause

number 05

- 18

- 00014

- CV. Appellant h as also requested the reporter’s record for the hearing held on May 3, 2019 and will pay for the record when she receives the invoice.
We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to transfer a copy of the reporter’s record of the December 15, 2017 hearing filed in appell ate cause number 05

- 18

- 00014

- CV into this appeal.
W e ORDER Cindy Bardwell, as the Official Court Reporter for the 429th J udicial District Court, to file, WITHIN TWENTY DAYS of the date of this order, the reporter’s
records from the April 12, 2018, A ugust 3, 2018, and May 3, 2019 hearings. Also before the Court is appellant’s November 6, 2019 motion to extend the time to file
her brief on the merits. As the record is not yet complete , appellant’s brief is not due. Accordingly, we DENY the motion as premature. Appellant’s brief will be due within thirty days after the date the reporter’s records are filed. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.6(a)(2).
We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Bardwell; Ms LaTresta Ginyard; Ms. Young

- Martinez; and all parties.
/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
### §4503. Security for advance payments

Advance payments under section 4501 of this title may be made only on adequate security and a determination by the agency head that to do so would be in the public interest. The security may be in the form of a lien in favor of the Federal Government on the property contracted for, on the balance in an account in which the payments are deposited, and on such of the property acquired for performance of the contract as the parties may agree. This lien shall be paramount to all other liens and is effective immediately upon the first advancement of funds without filing, notice, or any other action by the Federal Government.

(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3791.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 4503 | 41:255(d). | June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title III, §305(d), 63 Stat. 396; July 12, 1952, ch. 703, §1(m), 66 Stat. 594; Pub. L. 85–800, §4, Aug. 28, 1958, 72 Stat. 966; Pub. L. 103–355, title II, §2051(a)(4), (5), (d), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3304. |

Section
#### Walter Williams, Respondent, v. Lee & Simmons, Inc., Defendant, and Pittston Stevedoring Corp., Appellant.

Plaintiff, a longshoreman, while engaged in removing cargo from a barge, was injured when a heavy wooden case or cases which had been loaded by appellant in tiers seven feet high, fell, struck him and fractured his ankle. The jury awarded plaintiff a verdict for $7,500. Judgment reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, unless within ten days after the entry of the order hereon plaintiff stipulates to reduce the verdict to $5,500, in which event the judgment, as so reduced, is unanimously affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the verdict was excessive. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
### SUBCHAPTER IV—ELECTRIC MOTOR VEHICLES
# L_2018305EN.01003301.xml

| 29.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 305/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 305/33

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 66/2017

of 17 March 2017

amending Annex XXI (Statistics) to the EEA Agreement [2018/1830]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1872 of 6 October 2016 establishing for 2016 the ‘Prodcom list’ of industrial products provided for by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3924/91 (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1872 of 6 October 2016 establishing for 2016 the ‘Prodcom list’ of industrial products provided for by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3924/91 (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 4an (Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1711) of Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘4ao. | 32016 R 1872: Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1872 of 6 October 2016 establishing for 2016 the “Prodcom list” of industrial products provided for by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3924/91 (OJ L 290, 25.10.2016, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘4ao.

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) 2016/1872 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 18 March 2017, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 17 March 2017.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 290, 25.10.2016, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
OPENING REMARKS OF NRC CHAIRMAN GREGORY B. JACZKO AT THE 

BRIEFING ON THE NRC’S APPROACH TO SEVERE ACCIDENTS

Good morning. The Commission meets today to receive an overview of the agency’s 

approach to severe accidents and to discuss the potential uses for Level 3 probabilistic risk 

assessments (PRA). 

Since the 1995 PRA Policy Statement, the Commission has endorsed and encouraged the 

use of PRAs and other risk tools to strengthen our regulatory framework. Today, they are widely 

used by the NRC in a number of important safety areas, including fire protection and new reactor 

design reviews. Although not all of our activities necessarily lend themselves to this type of risk 

analysis, it is no exaggeration to say that the NRC today is a leader in the state-of-the-art use of 

PRA technology.

I want to thank the staff for developing a paper that lays out several options on how we 

can build on this strong foundation and move forward with the future use of Level 3 PRAs. 

There is no question that the state-of-the-art has improved significantly over the last two 

decades, and that there are new issues that perhaps should be examined through the completion 

of Level 3 PRAs. As the staff notes in their paper, those include issues raised by the Fukushima 

accident, specifically the challenges posed by multi-unit events and the risks of radiological 

releases from spent fuel pools.

It is a credit to everyone who has worked on these issues – including notably my 

colleague Commissioner Apostolakis – that we are today considering the development a fullscope Level 3 PRA. 

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC’s website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-142 July 28, 2011
JERRY NEIL ALFRED

,

Petitioner,

v.

STEPHEN K. ENFINGER, et al.,

L. T. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent s

. ___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FI LE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 1434

Opinion filed November 7, 2014.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari

– original jurisdiction

.

Jerry Neil Alfred, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Eric M . Neiberger, Assistant Attorney General,

Tallahassee ; Jennifer Parker, General Counsel, Department of Corrections,

Tallahassee, for Respondent s

.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

PADOVANO, THOMAS, and CLARK, JJ., CONCUR.
| + NASA Homepage+ NASA en Español+ Marte en Español+ Mars Home+ MER Home**Summary**                                                Related Links                                                                  + Freedom of Information Act+ The President's Management Agenda+ FY 2002 Agency Performance and                              accountability report+ NASA Privacy Statement, Disclaimer, and                              Accessiblity Certification+ Freedom to Manage                           Last Updated: + Comments and Questions |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### § 90.9 Review of challenge.

The Chief, Population Division, Census Bureau, or the Chief's designee shall review the evidence provided with the request for the population estimate challenge, shall work with the governmental unit to verify the data provided by the governmental unit, and evaluate the data to resolve the issues raised by the governmental unit. Furthermore, the designated FSCPE agencies are encouraged to serve as conduits with local governments in the review of pre-release estimates, to the extent that this is possible given data confidentiality requirements for pre-release data. Thereafter, the Census Bureau shall respond in writing with a decision to accept or deny the challenge. In the event that the Census Bureau finds that the population estimate should be updated, it will also post the revised estimate on the Census Bureau's website (*www.census.gov*).
#### § 1018.61 Statutory advisory committees.

A new charter shall be filed for each statutory advisory committee in accordance with section 9(c) of the Advisory Committee Act and § 1018.11 upon the expiration of each successive two-year period following the date of enactment of the statute establishing or requiring the establishment of the committee.
# j9 MINISTERIO rS DE FOMENTO Si 

### FAX
FROM:

TO: 

### Strategic and Policy. Headof Department Mr. Raúl Medina Caballero 

### Director, Office of International Aviation 

### US Department of Transportation Office of the Secretaryof Transportation Mr. Paul Gretch Fax: 1 202 366 6780 SECRETARIA DE ESTADO DE TRANSPORTES DIRECCIÓN GENERAL DE AVIACIÓN CIVIL SUBDIRECCIÓN GENERAL DE TRANSPORTE AÉREO

SUBJEC: TAG AVIATION ESPAÑA NON-SCHEDULED AIR SERVICES TO/FROM THE UNITED STATES S/REF: N/REF: 

## vz FECHA: 

### 8 July 2011 NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS ONE:


### Dear Mr. Gretch, Reg.



### With reference to the intentions of TAG Aviation España to conduct non-scheduled air services 

### to/from the UnitedStates based on fifth freedom traffic rights, the Spanish Civil Aviation Authority hereby confirms that similar requests submitted by United States air carriers will be treated on the basis ofreciprocity.

Raúl Medina Caballero 

### Deputy Directorate General for AirTransport

Correo electrónico: fax TAG Aviation julio2011 P° DE LA CASTELLANA, 67 28071 MADRID TEL: 91 597 81 40 FAX: 91 597 86 43 EN CASO DEPROBLEMAS ENLARECEPCIÓN. PORFAVOR LLAMEANUESTRAS OFICINAS.
### SUBCHAPTER XII–F—JUVENILE ACCOUNTABILITY BLOCK GRANTS
### §9502. Authority of Chief of Engineers

(a) In General.—The Chief of Engineers and necessary assistants may use all lawful means to carry out their duties.

(b) Supply of Water in District of Columbia.—

(1) Providing water.—The Chief of Engineers has complete control over the Washington Aqueduct to regulate the manner in which the authorities of the District of Columbia may tap the supply of water to the inhabitants of the District of Columbia.

(2) Stoppage of water flow.—The Chief of Engineers shall stop the authorities of the District of Columbia from tapping the supply of water when the supply is no more than adequate to the wants of the public buildings and grounds.

(3) Appeal of decision.—The decision of the Chief of Engineers on all questions concerning the supply of water under this subsection may be appealed only to the Secretary of the Army.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1234.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 9502(a), (b)(1), (2) | 40:51. | R.S. §1810. |
| 9502(b)(3) | 40:52. | R.S. §1811. |

Section

In subsection (b)(3), the words "Secretary of the Army" are substituted for "Department of War" [subsequently changed to "Department of the Army" because of section 205(a) of the National Security Act of 1947 (ch. 343, 61 Stat. 501)] because of 10:3013(a)(1).
### Part A—Clean Coal Power Initiative