alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Biobehavioral and Behavioral Processes Integrated Review Group; Language and Communication Study Section.                    

*Date:*                         February 11-12, 2019.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Warwick Denver, 1776 Grant Street, Denver, CO 80203.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Wind Cowles, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive Room 3172, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-437-7872,                         *cowleshw@csr.nih.gov.*

This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 25, 2019.

Natasha M. Copeland,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2019-00319 Filed 1-30-19; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 224 (Monday, November 22, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 67943]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25869]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Cyber Security Industry Alliance, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 20, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Cyber Security Industry 
Alliance, Inc. (``CSIA'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of 
the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of 
its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for 
the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: Cyber 
Security Industry Alliance, Inc., Wakefield, MA. The nature and scope 
of CSIA's standards development activities are: To promote the 
continuous enhancement of cyber security through public policy, 
education and technology-focused initiatives; (2) to promote such 
initiatives across the cyber security industry and on a global basis; 
(3) to promote and encourage the adoption of strong, effective 
technology standards relating to the cyber security industry through 
the foregoing initiatives and public education; and (4) to undertake 
such other activities as may from time to time be appropriate to 
further the purposes and achieve the goals set forth above.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-25869 Filed 11-19-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
### Part A—Volunteers in Service to America
§ 904.241 Depositions. ( a ) *Notice.* If a motion for deposition is granted, and unless otherwise ordered by the Judge, the party taking the deposition of any person must serve on that person and on any other party written notice at least 15 days before the deposition would be taken (or 25 days if the deposition is to be taken outside the United States). The notice must state the name and address of each person to be examined, the time and place where the examination would be held, the name, mailing address, telephone number, and email address (if one is available) of the person before whom the deposition would be taken, and the subject matter about which each person would be examined.
( b ) *Taking the deposition.* Depositions may be taken before any officer authorized to administer oaths by the law of the United States or of the place where the examination is to be held, or before a person appointed by the Judge. Each deponent will be sworn, and any party has the right to cross-examine. Objections are not waived by failure to make them during the deposition unless the ground of the objection is one that might have been removed if presented at that time. The deposition will be recorded, transcribed, signed by the deponent, unless waived, and certified by the officer before whom the deposition was taken. All transcription costs associated with the testimony of a deponent will be borne by the party seeking the deposition. Each party will bear its own expense for any copies of the transcript. See also § 904.252(a).
( c ) *Alternative deposition methods.* By order of the Judge, the parties may use other methods of deposing parties or witnesses, such as telephonic depositions, depositions through videoconference, or depositions upon written questions. Objections to the form of written questions are waived unless made within 5 days of service of the questions.
( d ) *Use of depositions at hearing.* ( 1 ) At hearing, part or all of any deposition, so far as admissible under this Part as though the witness were then testifying, may be used against any party who was present or represented at the taking of the deposition or had reasonable notice.
( 2 ) The deposition of a witness may be used by any party for any purpose if the Judge finds: ( i ) That the witness is unable to attend due to death, age, health, imprisonment, disappearance or distance from the hearing site; or
( ii ) That exceptional circumstances make it desirable, in the interest of justice, to allow the deposition to be used.
( 3 ) If only part of a deposition is offered in evidence by a party, any party may introduce any other part.
[71 FR 12448, Mar. 10, 2006, as amended at 87 FR 38938, June 30, 2022]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

DALE METZGER, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 457 WAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 15th day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED. 

Justice Eakin did not participate in the decision of this matter.
No. II-09-065 November 25, 2009 

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 562-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 562-4416 

NRC ISSUES ORDER MODIFYING CONSTRUCTION 

AUTHORIZATION FOR MIXED OXIDE FACILITY 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a Confirmatory Order to the mixed 

oxide facility under construction at the Department of Energy’s Savannah River site near Aiken, 

S.C. as part of a settlement agreement in a case involving a contract senior engineer allowing a 

junior engineer to sign his signature to documents in violation of facility construction procedures 

and NRC requirements. 

The order requires Shaw AREVA MOX Services, the company building the facility, to 

adhere to changes in its NRC construction authorization based on an agreement reached during 

alternative dispute resolution sessions with the agency in October. 

 

Shaw AREVA requested the alternative dispute resolution process to resolve differences 

with the NRC concerning the apparent violations and to discuss corrective actions. The 

confirmatory order documents the company’s commitments to the NRC reached as part of the 

NRC’s ADR process, which can be selected in place of traditional NRC enforcement. Often, the 

ADR process is more effective than traditional enforcement action. The ADR process uses a 

mediator to help the NRC and the company or organization find the best way to address the 

causes of the violations. The ADR process strives to make sure that effective long-term solutions 

for correcting violations are identified and agreed upon; that the commitment to improvement is 

made; and that the individual or organization meets the commitments made to the NRC in a way 

that ensures the agency’s safety rules and regulations are implemented. 

As part of the settlement agreement, Shaw AREVA agreed to a number of corrective 

actions and enhancements, including reviews of similar documents, revised procedures, 

increased training, and periodic quality assurance assessments and safety conscious work 

environment surveys. Some of the actions agreed to by Shaw AREVA have been completed and 

others must be completed by the end of next year. 

In consideration of the commitments made by Shaw AREVA, the NRC will not propose 

a civil penalty, issue a Notice of Violation or take other enforcement action on the matter. The 

NRC will, however, evaluate adherence to the commitments during future inspections. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov 
Copies of the letter and the Confirmatory Order will be available in the electronic reading 

room on the NRC website at www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html or by contacting the Office of 

Public Affairs in Region II with the contact information on this release. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
### SUBCHAPTER I—FIRST AMENDMENT PRIVACY PROTECTION
### SUBCHAPTER XII–C—RURAL DRUG ENFORCEMENT
### SUBCHAPTER VIII—COMMERCIAL INITIATIVES
§ 997.26 Civil liability. ( a ) For purposes of determining liability arising from the dissemination and use of observation data gathered pursuant to the ICOOS Act and these regulations, any non-Federal asset or regional information coordination entity incorporated into the System by contract, lease, grant, or cooperative agreement that is participating in the System shall be considered to be part of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Any employee of such a non-Federal asset or regional information coordination entity, while operating within the scope of his or her employment in carrying out the purposes of this subtitle, with respect to tort liability, is deemed to be an employee of the Federal Government.
( b ) The ICOOS Act's grant of civil liability protection (and thus the RCOS's limited status as part of NOAA) applies only to an RCOS that: ( 1 ) Is participating in the System, meaning the RCOS has been certified by NOAA in accordance with the ICOOS Act and these regulations; and
( 2 ) Has been integrated into the System by memorandum of agreement with NOAA.
( c ) An “employee” of a regional information coordination entity is an individual who satisfies all of the following requirements: ( 1 ) The individual is employed or contracted by a certified RCOS that has been integrated into the System by memorandum of agreement with NOAA, and that is participating in the System, as defined in § 997.26(b);
( 2 ) The individual is identified by the RCOS, as required in § 997.23(d)(3) and (f)(1)(i), as one of the individuals responsible for the collection, management, or dissemination of ocean, coastal, and Great Lakes observation data; and
( 3 ) The individual is responsive to federal government control.
( d ) The protection afforded to employees of an RCOS with regard to liability applies only to specific individuals employed or contracted by an RCOS who meet the requirements of § 997.26(c) and who are responsible for the collection, management, or dissemination of ocean, coastal, and Great Lakes observation data. The RCOS must identify to NOAA's satisfaction: The individual(s) responsible for overall system management, as applicable, the individual(s) responsible for observations system management across the region, and the individual(s) responsible for management of data operations across the region. In accepting certification, the RCOS will concede to NOAA the power to ensure these individuals comply with the requirements of this rule in their daily operations and that they are responsive to NOAA through the agreement the RCOS has with NOAA.
### Part E—Student Loans

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 105–392, title I, §123(2), Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3562, redesignated subpart II of part B as part E.

Pub. L. 94–63, title IX, §941(g)(3), July 29, 1975, 89 Stat. 365, inserted subpart II heading.
### Part B—Special Rural Programs
IB 

Union Calendar No. 482 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3409 

[Report No. 112–670] 

To limit the authority of the Secretary of the Interior to issue regulations 

before December 31, 2013, under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2011 

Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

SEPTEMBER 13, 2012 

Additional sponsors: Mr. STIVERS, Mr. HARRIS, Mr. ROE of Tennessee, Mr. 

BUCSHON, Mr. KELLY, Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky, Mr. FLORES, Mr. 

HARPER, Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, Mr. TIBERI, Mr. ROKITA, Mr. MCKINLEY, Mr. SHUSTER, Mr. BARTLETT, Mr. LATOURETTE, Mr. BERG, Mrs. 

CAPITO, Mr. GOSAR, and Mr. MURPHY of Pennsylvania 

SEPTEMBER 13, 2012 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3409 RH

A BILL 

To limit the authority of the Secretary of the Interior to 

issue regulations before December 31, 2013, under the 

Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3409 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Coal Miner Employ5 ment and Domestic Energy Infrastructure Protection 

6 Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON AUTHORITY TO ISSUE REGULA8 TIONS UNDER THE SURFACE MINING CON9 TROL AND RECLAMATION ACT OF 1977. 

10 The Secretary of the Interior may not, before Decem11 ber 31, 2013, issue or approve any proposed or final regu12 lation under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation 

13 Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.) that would— 

14 (1) adversely impact employment in coal mines 

15 in the United States; 

16 (2) cause a reduction in revenue received by the 

17 Federal Government or any State, tribal, or local 

18 government, by reducing through regulation the 

19 amount of coal in the United States that is available 

20 for mining; 

21 (3) reduce the amount of coal available for do22 mestic consumption or for export; 

23 (4) designate any area as unsuitable for surface 

24 coal mining and reclamation operations; or 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
4 

•HR 3409 RH

1 (5) expose the United States to liability for tak2 ing the value of privately owned coal through regula3 tion. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 482 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3409 

[Report No. 112–670] 

A BILL 

To limit the authority of the Secretary of the InteReclamation Act of 1977. 2013, under the Surface Mining Control and rior to issue regulations before December 31, 

SEPTEMBER 13, 2012 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
NRC EXITS MONITORING MODE FOR JAPANESE NUCLEAR EMERGENCY; 

CONTINUES TO SUPPORT U.S. GOVERNMENT EFFORTS

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission announced today it will exit “monitoring 

mode” and transition its response to the Japanese nuclear emergency from its 24-hour Operations 

Center to its Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR).

The NRC activated its headquarters-based Operations Center on March 11, 2011, in 

response to the events at Fukushima Daiichi in Japan. Since that time, staff from throughout the 

agency supported the U.S. government’s response, including staff dispatched to the U.S. 

Embassy in Tokyo. 

“The conditions at the Japanese reactors are slowly stabilizing. As conditions have 

continued to improve and the Japanese continue to implement their recovery plan, the NRC has 

determined that it is time to adjust our response,” said Executive Director for Operations Bill 

Borchardt. 

A team in NRR will assume the responsibility of supporting the NRC staff members in 

Japan, the U.S. Embassy, and will coordinate response efforts with federal and industry partners. 

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC’s website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-083 May 16, 2011
No: III-13-034 August 9, 2013

CONTACT: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663

NRC Increases Oversight of Point Beach for Flooding Protection Violation

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is increasing its oversight of the Point Beach Nuclear Plant 

Units 1 and 2 for failures to ensure appropriate procedures were in place for a potential flood. 

Point Beach is operated by NextEra Energy and is located in Two Rivers, Wis., approximately 

13 miles northeast of Manitowoc.

An NRC inspector identified the violation during an inspection conducted from January to 

March. The violation involved the failure of the plant to have procedures to prescribe how to protect 

safety-related equipment in the turbine building and pump house from potential lake flooding.

The NRC staff held a regulatory conference in July to discuss the risk significance of the 

preliminary finding. After reviewing the NRC inspection and information presented by the company, the 

NRC staff concluded the violation should be classified as “white,” meaning it has a low to moderate 

safety significance.

The company has taken corrective actions to address the violation and has additional actions 

planned in order to prevent recurrence.

The NRC will conduct a supplemental inspection to ensure that the root cause and contributing 

causes are identified and understood, and that corrective actions are sufficient.
# Diario Oficial C 366A/30 d

| | ISSN 1977-0928 |
| --- | --- |
| Diario Oficial
  de la Unión Europea | C 366A |
| | |
| Edición en lengua española | Comunicaciones e informaciones | 63.° año30 de octubre de 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0928

Diario Oficial

de la Unión Europea

C 366A

Edición en lengua española

Comunicaciones e informaciones

63.° año30 de octubre de 2020

---

| Sumario | Página |
| --- | --- |
| | Corrección de errores |
| 2020/C 366 A/01 | Corrección de errores del anuncio de vacante CONS/AD/162/20 ( DO C 358 A de 26.10.2020 ) | 1 |

Sumario

Página

Corrección de errores

2020/C 366 A/01

Corrección de errores del anuncio de vacante CONS/AD/162/20 ( DO C 358 A de 26.10.2020 )

( DO C 358 A de 26.10.2020 )

1

---

| ES | |
| --- | --- |

ES

---

Corrección de errores

| 30.10.2020 | ES | Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea | CA 366/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2020

ES

Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea

CA 366/1

---

Corrección de errores del anuncio de vacante CONS/AD/162/20

(
  Diario Oficial de la Unión Eropea C 358 A de 26 de octubre de 2020
  )

(2020/C 366 A/01)

En la página 1, bajo «INFORMACIÓN GENERAL», «Servicio»:

| donde dice: | «Dirección General de Relaciones Exteriores Asuntos Exteriores, Ampliación y Protección Civil», |
| --- | --- |

donde dice:

«Dirección General de Relaciones Exteriores Asuntos Exteriores, Ampliación y Protección Civil»,

| léase: | «DG RELEX:Relaciones Exteriores». |
| --- | --- |

léase:

léase:

«DG RELEX:Relaciones Exteriores».

En la página 1, bajo «Quiénes somos», párrafo segundo:

| donde dice: | «La Dirección General de Asuntos Exteriores, Ampliación y Protección Civil (DG RELEX) cuenta actualmente con dos direcciones: RELEX.1, que se ocupa de las cuestiones relativas a comercio, desarrollo, seguridad y coordinación, y RELEX.2, que se encarga de las cuestiones sobre ampliación, Oriente Medio y Norte de África y protección civil.», |
| --- | --- |

donde dice:

donde dice:

«La Dirección General de Asuntos Exteriores, Ampliación y Protección Civil (DG RELEX) cuenta actualmente con dos direcciones: RELEX.1, que se ocupa de las cuestiones relativas a comercio, desarrollo, seguridad y coordinación, y RELEX.2, que se encarga de las cuestiones sobre ampliación, Oriente Medio y Norte de África y protección civil.»,

| léase: | «La Dirección General “Relaciones Exteriores” (DG RELEX) cuenta actualmente con dos direcciones: RELEX.1, que se ocupa de las cuestiones relativas a comercio, desarrollo y seguridad, y RELEX.2, que se encarga de la política de vecindad y de la respuesta a las crisis.». |
| --- | --- |

léase:

léase:

«La Dirección General “Relaciones Exteriores” (DG RELEX) cuenta actualmente con dos direcciones: RELEX.1, que se ocupa de las cuestiones relativas a comercio, desarrollo y seguridad, y RELEX.2, que se encarga de la política de vecindad y de la respuesta a las crisis.».

---