alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Mortgagebrokers.com Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alex Haditaghi, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.      Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.      The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mortgagebrokers.com Holdings, Inc.

 
| Dated: May 22, 2006 |
|---------------------|

 

**MORTGAGEBROKERS.COM HOLDINGS, INC.**

 
| By: | */s/ Alex Haditaghi* |
|-----|----------------------|

President, Chief Executive Officer 

Chief Financial Officer and

Chairman of Board of Directors
Jntn najl 1-otop#m in.a

March 16, 2011

ATTN: Document-Control Desk

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Washington, DC 20555-0001

Subject: Submittal of Responses to Requests for Additional Information (RAI)

TAC L32739.

To Whom it May Concern,

The following document is provided as a response to the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission

RAIs pertaining to the International Isotopes Fluorine Products Inc. December 30, 2009

application to license a depleted uranium hexafluoride de-conversion and fluorine extraction

process facility.

(1) Official Responses to Electrical System RAIs - (Security Related Information)

Please contact me by phone at 208 524-5300 or email at jimiller@intisoid.com if you have any

questions regarding this letter or require additional information.

Sincerely,

John J. Miller, CHP

Radiation Safety Officer

JJM-2011-19

Enclosure as Stated

cc: Dr. Matthew Bartlett

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Mail Stop E2C40M 6003 Executive

Blvd. Rockville, MD 20852

4137 Commerce Circle, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83401 Phone:

208-524-5300, 800-699-3108 Fax: 208-424-1411 Website:

www.intisoid.com
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Tranquility, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 (the Report), I, Dominick Pope, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  March 28, 2008 /s/Dominick Pope     Chief Executive Officer
§ 998.30 Repayment for failure to satisfy service requirements. ( a ) An officer who fails to satisfy eligibility requirements or to meet the service requirements prescribed in §§ 998.23, 998.24, 998.25, 998.27(a), and 998.27(b) is required to reimburse the Government in an amount that bears the same ratio of the total costs of the training or education provided to that officer as the unserved portion of active duty bears to the total period of active duty the officer agreed to serve, unless waived by the Secretary under § 998.29(a) or (b). Calculation of the total cost of training subject to repayment includes tuition and matriculation fees, library and laboratory services, purchase or rental of books, materials, and supplies, but does not include travel, lodging, salary, or other allowances otherwise entitled to the individual. The total cost shall be calculated by the NOAA Commissioned Personnel Center and included in any written agreement.
( b ) An obligation to reimburse the Government under this Section is, for all purposes, a debt owed to the United States.
( c ) A discharge in bankruptcy under title 11 of the U.S. Code that is entered less than 5 years after the termination of a written agreement entered into under this part does not discharge the individual signing the agreement from a debt arising under such agreement.
§ 1105.13 Noncompensable costs. The items of cost toward which the Commission will not contribute include: ( a ) Costs for the acquisition of any interest in land or buildings;
( b ) Costs for the payment of items in excess of the participant's actual cost; and
( c ) Costs determined not to be allowable under generally accepted accounting principles and practices or part 1-15, Federal Procurement Regulations (41 CFR part 1-15).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

___________________

No. 16-2451

(7:08-cr-00043-D-1)

___________________

In re: KUNTA KENTA REDD,

 Petitioner.

___________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

___________________

Submitted: December 29, 2016 Decided: December 29, 2016

___________________

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and DIAZ, Circuit 

Judges.

____________________

Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

____________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

This case comes before the court on a petition for writ of 

mandamus filed by Kunta Kenta Redd under the Crime Victims' 

Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3771 ("CVRA"). The CVRA affords to

victims of crime the rights to reasonable protection from the 

accused, to notice of court proceedings, to participation

in court proceedings, to confer with government counsel, to

receive restitution, to proceedings free from unreasonable

delay, and to be treated with fairness. 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a).

These rights must be asserted in the district court and, if

the district court denies relief, the movant may petition

the court of appeals for a writ of mandamus. 18 U.S.C. §

3771(d)(3). If such a petition is filed, "[t]he court of

appeals shall take up and decide such application forthwith

within 72 hours after the petition has been filed." Id. If

the court of appeals denies the relief sought, "the reasons for

the denial shall be clearly stated on the record in a written 

opinion." Id.

Petitioner maintains that he is entitled to relief under 

the CVRA as a result of alleged plea bargaining abuse. He 

asserts that he should be allowed to reopen his plea and sentence. 

He seeks to bring charges against certain “suspects” and against 

an Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms agent. He challenges the 
3

veracity of various suspects or informants. He asserts that the 

district court and the court of appeals have erred in their 

rulings involving his criminal case and implies the courts are 

biased against him. 

Petitioner is not a crime victim under the CVRA. He pled 

guilty, pursuant to a written plea agreement, to one count of 

conspiracy to distribute and to possess with the intent to 

distribute cocaine and 50 grams or more of cocaine base, in 

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 846. He has challenged his conviction 

and sentence on appeal and in various post-conviction 

proceedings. The CVRA defines a “crime victim” as a “person 

directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of 

a Federal offense or an offense in the District of Columbia.” 

18 U.S.C. § 3771(e)(2)(A). Redd clearly does not come within

the statutory definition. The CVRA also provides that “[a] 

person accused of the crime may not obtain any form of relief 

under this chapter.” 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(l).

Accordingly, the court dismisses the petition for writ

of mandamus.

PETITION DISMISSED
No: III-14-013 April 2, 2014

CONTACT: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663

NRC Monitoring ALERT at 

Quad Cities Nuclear Power Plant

The Quad Cities nuclear power plant, a commercial nuclear facility licensed by the U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission, declared an Alert for Unit 2 at 1:40 p.m. CDT. The two-unit plant, with Mark 1 

boiling water reactors, is operated by Exelon Generation Co. and is located in Cordova, Ill., roughly 20 

miles northeast of Moline.

The operators declared an Alert for Unit 2 due to smoke in the turbine building with indications 

of damage to safety related electrical equipment. The plant’s fire brigade responded to the scene, and the 

plant called the local fire department and two ambulances to the site as a precaution. There were no 

reports of injuries.

Unit 2 was safely shut down. There have been no abnormal releases of radioactive material as a 

result of this event. Unit 1 continues to operate at full power.

The NRC mobilized its Incident Response Center in Region III located in Lisle, Ill., and is 

monitoring the events. The NRC resident inspectors at the site are closely following the plant’s actions 

from the control room.

An Alert is the second lowest of four NRC emergency classifications used to declare an event 

which may involve an actual or potential substantial degradation of the level of safety of the plant. 

The NRC’s primary concern right now is to make sure the public is protected and that the plant 

operator is taking swift and appropriate action to continue to maintain plant safety. Once the situation is 

resolved, the NRC will fully inspect the cause of and contributing factors to the event.
### §90108. Annual audit

The foundation shall enter into a contract with an independent auditor to conduct an annual audit of the foundation.

(Added Pub. L. 107–252, title VI, §601(a), Oct. 29, 2002, 116 Stat. 1721, §152608; renumbered §90108, Pub. L. 113–237, §3(c)(6)(B), Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 2840.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–237 renumbered section 152608 of this title as this section.
No: 13-040 May 22, 2013

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200

 

NRC to Discuss Post-Fukushima “Regulatory Framework”

June 5 in Rockville, Md.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with interested parties June 5 to discuss the 

staff’s progress in implementing a recommendation to revise the NRC’s regulatory approach in light 

of the Fukushima nuclear accident in March 2011.

The meeting will be held from 8 a.m. to noon in Room 1C03 of the NRC’s Three White 

Flint building at 11601 Landsdown Street, just off Marinelli Road in Rockville, Md. NRC staff will 

explain their current efforts to respond to Commission direction on implementing the Japan NearTerm Task Force’s Recommendation 1, which calls for developing a regulatory framework that 

appropriately balances requirements for multiple safety measures with consideration of unlikely, 

high-consequence events.

The public will have the opportunity to ask questions about the Recommendation 1 effort

during the meeting, which will include a teleconference and webinar. Those planning to attend the 

meeting or who need teleconference and webinar information should contact Brian Wagner at 

301-251-7595 or brian.wagner@nrc.gov by May 31 to ensure adequate resources are available.

The NRC’s Japan Near-Term Task Force examined issues raised by the Fukushima Dai-ichi

nuclear accident in March 2011. The NRC continues to evaluate and act on the Task Force’s 

recommendations to ensure U.S. nuclear power plants implement appropriate safety enhancements. 

Following direction from the agency’s five Commissioners, the NRC’s activities are being led by a 

steering committee of senior NRC management. The agency has also established the Japan LessonsLearned Project Directorate, a group of more than 20 full-time employees focused exclusively on 

implementing task force recommendations and related activities.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Deafness and Other Communications Disorders Special Emphasis Panel, Intraneural Auditory Prosthesis Stimulating Electrode Array.                    

*Date:*                         December 15, 2004.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6120 Executive Blvd., Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Da-yu Wu, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, NIDCD, NIH, 6120 Executive Blvd., Suite 400C, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-8683,                         *wudy@nidcd.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 10, 2004.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-25583  Filed 11-17-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 218 (Friday, November 12, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 65468]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25121]



[[Page 65468]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 04-122]


Notice of Prospective Patent License

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of prospective patent license.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NASA hereby gives notice that Kid Saver, Incorporated, of Fort 
Lauderdale, Florida, has applied for an exclusive license to practice 
the invention described and claimed in U.S. Patent No. 6,714,132 
entitled ``Self-Activating System and Method for Alerting When an 
Object or a Person is Left Unattended,'' and NASA Case No. LAR 16324-2 
entitled ``Self-Activating System and Method for Alerting When an 
Object or a Person is Left Unattended,'' both of which are assigned to 
the United States of America as represented by the Administrator of the 
National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Written objections to 
the prospective grant of a license should be sent to NASA Langley 
Research Center. NASA has not yet made a determination to grant the 
requested license and may deny the requested license even if no 
objections are submitted within the comment period.

DATES: Responses to this notice must be received by November 29, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Helen Galus, Patent Attorney, Mail 
Stop 212, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23681-2199, (757) 
864-3227; Fax 757-864-9190.

    Dated: November 2, 2004.
Keith T. Sefton,
Deputy General Counsel (Administration and Management).
[FR Doc. 04-25121 Filed 11-10-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
§ 1013.2 Definitions. ( a ) As used in this part 1013, the following terms shall have the respective meanings set forth in paragraphs (a), (c) and (d) of § 1011.2 of this subchapter: “Agency,” “Commissioner,” “Commission.”
( b ) *Majority of the Commission.* Three or more of the Commissioners.
( c ) *Commission meeting.* The joint deliberations of at least a majority of the Commission where such deliberations determine or result in the joint conduct or disposition of official Agency business. This term does not include meetings required or permitted by § 1013.4(b) (to determine whether a meeting will be open or closed), meetings required or permitted by § 1013.3(e) (to change the subject matter of a meeting or the determination to open or close a meeting after the public announcement) or meetings required or permitted by 1013.3(c) (to dispense with the one week advance notice of a meeting).
#### Jean Fernandes, Respondent, v. Anthony Fernandes, Appellant.

Present — Holán, P. J., Johnston, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ. [192 Misc. 484.]
### Part I—Violence Against Women Act Court Training and Improvements

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This part was, in the original, subtitle J of title IV of Pub. L. 103–322, as added by Pub. L. 109–162, and was redesignated as part I of this subchapter for purposes of codification.
### subpart i—grants for demonstration projects
#### § 1117.8 Effect of reports on liability.

A report by a manufacturer, distributor, retailer, or importer under this part shall not be interpreted, for any purpose, as an admission of liability or of the truth of the information contained in the report.
408 P.2d 150

#### Clifford KIZER, Petitioner, v. George L. REESE, Jr., District Judge, Respondent.

No. 8042.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Dec. 1, 1965.

Ordered that the petition for alternative writ of prohibition be and the same is hereby denied.
### §1907. List of laws inapplicable to procurements of commercially available off-the-shelf items

(a) Inclusion in Federal Acquisition Regulation.—

(1) In general.—The Federal Acquisition Regulation shall include a list of provisions of law that are inapplicable to contracts for the procurement of commercially available off-the-shelf items. A provision of law properly included on the list pursuant to paragraph (2) does not apply to contracts for the procurement of commercially available off-the-shelf items. This section does not render a provision of law not included on the list inapplicable to contracts for the procurement of commercially available off-the-shelf items.

(2) Laws to be included.—A provision of law described in subsection (b) shall be included on the list of inapplicable provisions of law required by paragraph (1) unless the Administrator makes a written determination that it would not be in the best interest of the Federal Government to exempt contracts for the procurement of commercially available off-the-shelf items from the applicability of the provision.

(3) Other authorities or responsibilities not affected.—This section does not modify, supersede, impair, or restrict authorities or responsibilities under—

(A) section 15 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644); or

(B) bid protest procedures developed under the authority of—

(i) subchapter V of chapter 35 of title 31;

(ii) section 3308 of title 10; or

(iii) sections 3706 and 3707 of this title.

(b) Covered Law.—Except as provided in subsection (a)(3), a provision of law referred to in subsection (a)(1) is a provision of law that the Administrator determines imposes Federal Government-unique policies, procedures, requirements, or restrictions for the procurement of property or services on persons whom the Federal Government has awarded contracts for the procurement of commercially available off-the-shelf items, except for a provision of law that—

(1) provides for criminal or civil penalties; or

(2) specifically refers to this section and provides that, notwithstanding this section, it shall be applicable to contracts for the procurement of commercially available off-the-shelf items.

(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3724;Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVII, §1702(h)(8), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2158.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1907 | 41:431(a), (b). | Pub. L. 93–400, §35(a), (b), as added Pub. L. 104–106, title XLII, §4203(a), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 654; Pub. L. 105–85, title X, §1073(g)(2)(C), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1906. |

Section

#### Amendments

2021—Subsec. (a)(3)(B)(ii). Pub. L. 117–81 substituted "section 3308" for "section 2305(e) and (f)".
§ 880.302 Payments of CSRS or FERS benefits. ( a ) OPM will pay an amount equal to the survivor annuity that would be payable as CSRS or FERS survivor annuity to an account in a financial institution designated (under electronic funds transfer regulations in part 209 or part 210 of Title 31, Code of Federal Regulations) by an individual who, if the missing annuitant were dead, would be entitled to receive payment of a survivor annuity.
( b ) If more than one individual would qualify for survivor annuity payments in the event of the missing annuitant's death, OPM will make separate payments in the same manner as if the missing annuitant were dead.
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Tranquility, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 (the Report), I, Dominick Pope, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  October 29, 2006 /s/Dominick Pope     President