alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION

I, Ron Schmitz, certify that:

1.
     I have reviewed this 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007, of Knightsbridge Resources Inc.;2.
     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
     The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:a.
     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc.
     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and5.
     The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a.
     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.


Date:
     August 20, 2007
     RON SCHMITZRon SchmitzPresident, Principal Executive Officer, PrincipalAccounting Officer and Principal FinancialOfficer


---
#### § 971.405 Breach of international peace and security involving armed conflict.

Before issuing or transferring a commercial recovery permit, the Administrator must find that the recovery proposed in the application will not create a situation which may reasonably be expected to lead to a breach of international peace and security involving armed conflict.
### §152112. Annual report

The corporation shall submit an annual report to Congress on the activities of the corporation during the prior fiscal year. The report shall be submitted at the same time as the report of the audit required by section 10101 of this title. The report may not be printed as a public document.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1412.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 152112 | 36:4111. | Nov. 14, 1988, Pub. L. 100–655, §112, 102 Stat. 3851. |

Section

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Termination of Reporting Requirements

For termination, effective May 15, 2000, of reporting provisions in this section, see section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance, and page 204 of House Document No. 103–7.
### [§1806. Repealed. Pub. L. 106–419, title IV, §401(c)(3), Nov. 1, 2000, 114 Stat. 1860]

Section, added Pub. L. 104–204, title IV, §421(b)(1), Sept. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 2926; amended Pub. L. 105–114, title IV, §404(b)(1), Nov. 21, 1997, 111 Stat. 2294, related to applicability of certain administrative provisions.

Prior section 1806 was renumbered section 3706 of this title.

Prior section 1807, added Pub. L. 94–324, §2(a), June 30, 1976, 90 Stat. 720; amended Pub. L. 97–72, title III, §303(d), Nov. 3, 1981, 95 Stat. 1060, related to service after July 25, 1947, and prior to June 27, 1950, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 100–322, title IV, §415(a)(4), May 20, 1988, 102 Stat. 550.

Prior section 1810 was renumbered section 3710 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective on the first day of the first month beginning more than one year after Nov. 1, 2000, see section 401(g) of Pub. L. 106–419, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1811 of this title.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph I. Romano, Appellant.

[820 NYS2d 534]

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County (Bruhn, J.), rendered May 23, 2005, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of robbery in the second degree.

In satisfaction of a two-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to robbery in the second degree and was sentenced to the minimum permissible prison term of 31⁄2 years, followed by five years of postrelease supervision. On appeal, appellate counsel for defendant seeks to be relieved of his assignment on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record, assigned counsel’s brief and defendant’s pro se submission, we agree. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and the application for leave to withdraw is granted *(see People v Cruwys,*113 AD2d 979 [1985], *lv denied*67 NY2d 650 [1986]; *see generally People v Stokes,*95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Carpinello, JJ., *1054concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.
### SUBCHAPTER III—CONSTRUCTION
### RO 11060 9443.1985(02)

FEB 26 1985

Mr. Kevin J. Walter

Bureau of Technical Services

Division of Environmental Enforcement Department of Environmental Conservation

State of New York

50 Wolf Road Albany, New York 12233-0001

Dear Mr. Walter:

I am writing in response to your recent letter requesting

clarification of the definition ofthe characteristics of ignitability for hazardous wastes.

Your understanding that the words "it is a liquid, other than an aqueous solution containi ng less than 24 percent alcohol by volume" were intended to exclude alcoholic beverages, such as wine, and non-liquid materials is correct. However, while the Agency's intent was that this exemption apply to potable beverages only, because the term "alcohol" was used instead of "ethanol," all aqueous wastes which are ignitable only because they contain alcohols (here using the term alcoho l to mean any chemical containing the hydroxyl [-OH] functional grou p) are excluded from regulation.

While the Agency completes the process of officially adopting a method for identifying "free liquids," for use in the land disposal regulations, it is our cu rrent practice to employ Method 9095 (see "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,SW-946 ̄) for such purposes. Any material passi ng through the paint filter is deemed to be a liquid.

With respect to what consti tutes an "aqueous solution,"

such a solution is one in which water is the primary component. This means that water constitutes at least 50 percent by weight of the sample. Although, we have not officially approved any test methods for determining a waste's water content, any competent laboratory should be able to make such a determination using standard techniques (e.g., Karl Fisher titration, GC).

We share your concern over th e ambiguities in the current ignitability definition and have a program underway to correct

the characteristic's shortcomin gs. Specifically, changes are under development to replace the alcoholic solution exclusion

### RO 11060 - 2 -

with a generic exclusion for those wastes which, while possessing a flash point below 60 ̄C, neither continue to burn nor, if they do burn, release enough energy to cause a major fire. In addition, steps are being taken to expand the ignitability characteristic to include wastes which are physical solids. Both of these changes will involve proposal and promulgation of specific

definitional test methods and thresholds.

I hope this information clears up any questions you may have about the ignitability char acteristic. If you have any further questions concerning any of the hazardous waste characteristics, please contact Da vid Friedman, of my staff, at

202-382-4770.

Sincerely yours,

Original Document signed

John H. Skinner

Director
Office of Solid Waste

bcc: G.A. Lucero WH-527

A. Corson

David Friedman Regional Solid Waste Branch Chiefs

Hotline
NRC CHAIRMAN GREGORY B. JACZKO’S REMARKS ABOUT TODAY’S 

PERIODIC BRIEFING ON NEW REACTOR ISSUES 

Note: The NRC Commissioners were briefed today by industry representatives and NRC staff on 

issues associated with new reactor inspections, tests, analysis and acceptance criteria (ITAAC). 

At our Commission meeting today, we continued to discuss the very important process 

used to verify that any new commercial nuclear power plant, with a combined license, has been 

constructed and will be operated in accordance with its license and NRC regulations. This 

process is called ITAAC, which stands for “inspections, tests, analysis and acceptance criteria.” 

The NRC staff has done a lot of work to determine under which circumstances a notification 

needs to be provided to the Commission and made available to the public regarding successfully 

completed ITAAC requirements, as well as changes required during the process. 

Substantial progress has been made in bringing greater regulatory clarity to ITAAC 

closure and maintenance, and, in an effort to ensure the clarity and predictability of this process 

is enhanced, the staff has recommended proceeding with a change to the rules in the area of 

ITAAC closure and maintenance. Considering the schedules for reviewing combined 

construction and operating license (COL) applications, I support and encourage the staff to 

continue to move in an expedited manner to bring these much needed improvements to our 

regulations. This will be one of the most important steps in making sure that a new nuclear 

power plant was constructed according to all safety and operating requirements. 

I commend the efforts of the staff, industry and other external stakeholders, for the 

progress made to date on refining and improving the ITAAC process. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web 

address: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at 

www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when 

news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 09-157 September 22, 2009
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I,Gerald J. Burnett, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the AnnualReport of Avistar Communications Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscalyear ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in such Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects thefinancial condition and results of operations of Avistar CommunicationsCorporation.
|        | By:    | /s/ GERALD J. BURNETT                   |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|   |   | Gerald J. Burnett                       |
|   |   | *Chief  Executive Officer and Chairman* |
|   |   | *(Principal  Executive Officer)*        |

 

I,Robert J. Habig, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the AnnualReport of Avistar Communications Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscalyear ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in such Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects thefinancial condition and results of operations of Avistar CommunicationsCorporation.
|        | By:    | /s/ ROBERT J. HABIG                             |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Robert J. Habig                                 |
|   |   | *Chief  Financial Officer*                      |
|   |   | *(Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer)* |

 

----
Exhibit 99.7

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Leitch Technology Corporation (the "Company") on Form 40-F for the year ended April 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tim E. Thorsteinson, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|September 13, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/TIM THORSTEINSONTim E. Thorsteinson
President and Chief Executive Officer
|------------------ |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Harold Rosenthal, Appellant.

Present —• Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.
### SUBCHAPTER XVII–A—DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD
### §8163. Use of greenhouses and nursery for trees, shrubs, and plants

The greenhouses and nursery shall be used only for the propagation of trees, shrubs, and plants suitable for planting in the public reservations. Only those trees, shrubs, and plants shall be planted in the public reservations.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1209.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8163 | 40:103. | June 20, 1878, ch. 359 (proviso in 2d par. under heading "Building and Grounds in and Around Washington and the Executive Mansion"), 20 Stat. 220. |

Section

The words "On and after June 20, 1878" are omitted as obsolete. The words "Only those trees, shrubs, and plants shall be planted in the public reservations" are substituted for "to which purpose only the said productions of the greenhouses and nursery shall be applied" for clarity.
###### Editorial Note on Part 922

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

#### § 922.194 [Reserved]
### §3404. Unsealed letters sent by blind or physically handicapped persons

Unsealed letters sent by a blind person or a person having a physical impairment, as described in section 3403(a)(1) of this title, in raised characters or sightsaving type, or in the form of sound recordings, may be mailed free of postage.

(Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 758.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1971, pursuant to Resolution No. 71–9 of the Board of Governors. See section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note preceding section 101 of this title.
No. II-11-006 March 4, 2011

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416

NRC SCHEDULES MEETING TO DISCUSS CRYSTAL RIVER RESTART 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a meeting in Crystal River, Fla., 

to discuss the restart of the Crystal River nuclear plant, located on the west coast of Florida about 

80 miles north of Tampa.

The meeting is scheduled for 1 p.m. on Tuesday, March 22 in Room 150 of the Crystal 

River nuclear plant training center, 8200 West Venable Street in Crystal River, and will be open 

to members of the public and the news media. NRC and Progress Energy officials will discuss 

the company’s preparations and readiness to restart the plant. NRC officials will also be 

available to answer questions after the discussion. 

The Crystal River plant shut down in the fall of 2009 for a planned refueling outage that 

included replacement of the steam generators. To move the large steam generators into the 

containment building, workers removed concrete to create the necessary opening. During that 

work, the plant staff discovered a separation or gap in the concrete containment wall. The Crystal 

River plant has been shut down since then while Progress Energy investigated the cause of the 

gap and repaired the concrete containment.

 

“The separation did not increase the risk to people living near the plant because the 

company’s analyses and our inspections found that the gap was created by the work done after 

the plant was shut down,” said NRC Region II Administrator Victor McCree.“NRC inspectors

have conducted many inspections and reviews of the company’s analyses and repairs, and the 

plant will not restart until the repaired containment building meets all safety requirements.” 

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE

Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov
### **CHAPTER 32—THIRD PARTY LIABILITY FOR HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CARE**

Sec.
2651.
Recovery by United States.
2652.
Regulations.
2653.
Limitation or repeal of other provisions for recovery of hospital and medical care costs.
No. IV-11-020

Contact: Victor Dricks (817) 860-8128

 Lara Uselding (817) 276-6519

May 3, 2011 

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

NRC TO DISCUSS 2010 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

OF COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet in Glen Rose, Texas, on Thursday, 

May 12, with representatives of Luminant Generation Co., to discuss the agency’s assessment of 

safety performance for the Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant. The plant is located near Glen 

Rose. 

The meeting, which will be open to the public, is scheduled to begin at 6 p.m. at the 

Somervell County Expo Exhibit Hall, 102 Northeast Vine Street, Glen Rose, Texas. In addition to 

the performance assessment, the NRC staff will be available to answer questions from the public on 

the safety performance of Comanche Peak and the NRC’s role in ensuring safe plant operation.

“The NRC continually reviews the performance of Comanche Peak and the nation’s other

commercial nuclear power facilities,” said NRC Region IV Administrator Elmo E. Collins. “The 

meeting provides an opportunity for us to discuss our annual assessment of the plant with the 

company, local officials and the public. We look forward to answering any questions they may have 

about our oversight.”

A letter sent from the NRC Region IV office to plant officials addresses the performance

of the plant during 2010 and will serve as the basis for discussion. It is available on the NRC 

website at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/cp_2010q4.pdf.

The NRC said Comanche Peak operated safely during 2010 and will receive the detailed

inspection regime during 2011 used by the NRC for plants that are operating well. Inspections are 

performed by NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant and by inspection specialists

from the Region IV Office in Arlington, Texas.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125

Telephone: (817) 860-8128

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov
Current performance information for Comanche Peak Units 1 and 2 is available on the

NRC website at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/CP1/cp1_chart.html and

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/CP2/cp2_chart.html.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marco Community Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Richard Storm, Jr., Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of and for the period covered by the Report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                                                
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Date: September 27, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Richard Storm, Jr.                         
|                         |  |  |  |     |  | Richard Storm, Jr., Principal Executive Officer