alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Performance Capital
Management, LLC (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, David J. Caldwell, as Chief Operations Officer of the Company, and I, Edward
M. Rucker, as Accounting Manager of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ David J.
      CaldwellDavid
      J. CaldwellChief
      Operations OfficerAugust
      18, 2008/s/EdwardM.RuckerEdward M. RuckerAccounting
      ManagerAugust
      18, 2008








The
material contained in this exhibit is not deemed “filed” with the Commission and
is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing, except to the extent
that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
409 P.2d 262

#### Hobart M. SHULENBURG, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS of the State of New Mexico, Respondent.

No. 7863.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Jan. 3, 1966.

Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb, Charles B. Larrabee, Albuquerque, for petitioner.

Marrón & Houk, Albuquerque, for respondent.

CARMODY, Chief Justice.

Petitioner seeks a review of the decision of the Board of Bar Examiners, denying his application for admission to the New Mexico State Bar upon motion.

Except for the difference of name, the excerpt of the minutes of the Board of Bar Examiners is identical with that set out in the opinion in Rask v. Board of Bar Examiners, 75 N.M. 617, 409 P.2d 256.

Petitioner was admitted to the Bar of Illinois in 1922, following his graduation from the University of Chicago Law School. He has been a member of the Colorado Bar and has actively practiced in Denver for more than twenty years. He is, on the face of the record, in all respects qualified to become a member of the New Mexico Bar and is of good moral character.

For the reasons stated in Rask, the decision of the Board of Bar Examiners is reversed, and petitioner’s motion for admission will be granted. It is so ordered.

CHAVEZ, NOBLE, MOISE, and COMPTON, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1


Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer


of CNA Financial Corporation


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350


(As adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of CNA Financial Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:


• the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2022 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


• the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:October 31, 2022By/s/ Dino E. RobustoDino E. RobustoChief Executive Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### § 971.428 Other necessary permits.

Each permit will provide that securing the deep seabed mining permit for activities described in the recovery plan and accompanying application does not eliminate the need to secure all other necessary Federal, State, and local permits.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6719

ANTHONY D. HARRIS, SR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND;

JON P. GALLEY,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.

(CA-00-3750-WMN)

Submitted: June 21, 2001 Decided: July 5, 2001

Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony D. Harris, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Celia Anderson Davis,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony D. Harris, Sr. seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. See Harris v. Attorney General MD, No. CA-00-3750-WMN (D. Md. Apr. 17, 2001). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 0.6 [Reserved]
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 09, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 09, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A19D0520. BRUCE D. TERRY v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

12CR2766
Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of SpeechWorks International, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended
December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Richard J. Westelman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that:



(1)    the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |    
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ---
|                     
|Dated: March 26, 2003 |  |  |  | By:
|                      |  |  |  |    



A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SpeechWorks International, Inc. and will be retained by SpeechWorks International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title:****Marine Corps University, Command andStaff College catalog [electronic resource]
 
2003-2004
 
SuDoc Number:D 214.37:
Item Number:0383-B-02 (online)
CGP System Number:000553907
 
 
 
** 
**Permanent Public Access
** 
Title 44 of  the United States Code (44 U.S.C. Section 1911) stipulates that public access  to official Government information products disseminated through the Federal  Depository Library Program (FDLP) must be maintained permanently in regional  depository libraries and by depository libraries not served by a regional  library. Since online products are not physically distributed to depository  libraries for retention, GPO has assumed responsibility for the provision of  permanent access to Government information products residing on FDsys  servers.
GPO's  permanent public access commitment is also met by bringing  agency-disseminated Internet resources under the purview of GPO and  incorporating them into a digital archive. GPO captures copies of agency  electronic information products, and creates PURLs so that users will be  automatically redirected to the archived products if the information is no  longer accessible on the agency Web site. Please refer to the report Managing  the FDLP Electronic Collection: A Policy and Planning Document for more  information.
 
August 11, 2017********
§ 768.8 Eligibility of expedited licensing procedures for non-controlled countries. ( a ) BIS determines the eligibility of an item for expedited licensing procedures on the basis of an evaluation of the foreign availability of the item. Eligibility is specific to the items and the countries to which they are found to be available.
( b ) BIS will initiate an eligibility evaluation: ( 1 ) On its own initiative;
( 2 ) On receipt of a FAS; or
( 3 ) On receipt of a TAC certification.
( c ) Upon initiation of an eligibility evaluation following receipt of either a FAS or TAC certification, BIS will notify the claimant or TAC of the receipt and initiation of an evaluation and publish a Federal Register notice of the initiation of the evaluation.
( d ) The criteria for determining eligibility for expedited licensing procedures are: ( 1 ) The item must be available-in-fact to the specified non-controlled country from a foreign source;
( 2 ) The item must be of a quality similar to that of the U.S.-controlled item; and
( 3 ) The item must be available-in-fact to the specified non-controlled country without effective restrictions.
( e ) Within 30 days of initiation of the evaluation, the Secretary of Commerce will make a determination of foreign availability on the basis of the BIS evaluation and recommendation, taking into consideration the evidence the Secretaries of Defense, State, and other interested agencies provide to BIS and any other information that the Secretary considers relevant.
( f ) Within 30 days of the receipt of the FAS or TAC certification, BIS will publish the Secretary's determination in the Federal Register, that the item will or will not be eligible for expedited licensing procedures to the stated countries and, where appropriate, amend supplement no. 2 to part 768.
( g ) Following completion of a self-initiated evaluation, BIS will be notified of the Secretary's determination and, where appropriate, supplement no. 2 to part 768 will be amended.
( h ) Foreign availability submissions and TAC certifications to initiate an expedited licensing procedure evaluation must be clearly designated on their face as a request for expedited licensing procedure and must specify the items, quantities and countries alleged eligible. Submissions and certifications should be sent to: Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security, Room H-1093, 14th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230.
[61 FR 12915, Mar. 25, 1996, as amended at 72 FR 25196, May 4, 2007]
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00456-CV

In re Directory Assistants, Inc.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TOM GREEN COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin

Filed: July 29, 2014
Honorable Geo. II.Sheppard

Comptroller of PublicAccounts Austin, Texas
Dear Mr. Sheppard: OpinionNo. O-5087 Re: Authority of the Comptroller to issuewarrant payable to County Treasurer for the Offlcers' Salary Fund, while the County Treasurer Is at the time emploged as principal teacher In a public school.

YOU propound to us for a legal opinion the following: "Thisdepartment has been notified that the 

### auig elected CountyTreasurer of Navarro County has flled oath and bond but has not received commission from the Secretary of State. She is at the same time holding a position of principal teacher in the Corsicanapublic school. In view of this fact this department desires your answer to the followingquestions:
"Isthe Comptroller authorized to issuewarrant payable to the County Treasurer ofNavarro County for the Officers' Salary Fund due,.Navarro County by the State of Texas while such County Treasurer'ls employedas principal teacher in the Corsicanapublic school?
"Is this department authorized to issuewarrant payable to the Corslcana IndependentSchool District for the apportionmentdue said district by the State of Texas when part of the funds represented in saidwarrant will be used for the payment or the partial payment of the salary to the principal teacher of the Corslcanapublic school when such teacher at the same time holds the office of County Treasurer?"' Section 33 of ArticleXVI of the Constitutionreferred to by you is as follows:Honorable Geo. H. Sheppard - page 2 

### O-5087

“TheAccounting Officers of this State shall neither draw nor pay a warrant upon the~~Treasury

in favor of any person, for salary or compensationas agent, officer or appointee,who holds at the same time any other office or position of honor, trust or profit,/under this State or theUnited States, except as prescribed in this Constitution." This provision of the Constitution is not applicable to the situationpresented.

The employmentof the County Treasurer as a principal teacher in the city schools of,Corsicana Isundoubtedly a "positlonof honor, trust and profitunder this State,"but it has no applicationbecause the proposedvoucher to the Treasurer is'~'not

"for salary or compensationas agent, officer or appointee," whatsoever. The sum for which the warrant issues to the~county Treasurer is the State's contribution to the Officers' Salary Fund of Nav-arroCounty,and the CountyTreasurer, in receiving and turning over to the OfficersISalary Fund the proceeds thereof, Is doing so in a fiduciary capacity. The warrant should issue in the ordinary course.

Upon similarreasoning your second question should be answered to the same effect.

Warrant to the schooldistrict is not one to the teacher, even though the teacher is to be paid a salaryby the district from fundsmade up in part of the State warrant. Such a warrant may lawfully issue and shouldbe paid. Very truly yours ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS By s/OcLe Speer Ocie Speer Assistant
OS-MR-WC
APPROVED FEB 

### 13, 1943 s/Gerald C. Mann ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS Approved Opinion CommitteeBy s/BWB Chairman
NExTera

ENERG-Y,4

S EA BROO K

June 21, 2012

SBK-L-12129

Docket No. 50-443

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Attn: Document Control Desk

One White Flint North

11555 Rockville Pike

Rockville, MD 20852

Seabrook Station

Response to Confirmatory Action Letter

Reference: NRC letter to NextEra Energy Seabrook, CAL No. 1-2012-002,

Confirmatory Action Letter (CAL), Seabrook Station, Unit 1 -

Information Related to Concrete Degradation Issues (ML 121254172)

In the above reference, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a

Confirmatory Action Letter, stating its expectation that NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC

(NextEra Energy Seabrook) will carry out the commitments outlined in the letter

according to its previously provided schedule. Accordingly, NextEra Energy Seabrook is

required to submit the technical details of the testing planned at the contracted research

and development facility by June 30, 2012.

The enclosure of this letter contains the technical details of the testing planned at the

contracted research and development facility.

Should you have any questions regarding this letter or the enclosure to this letter, please

contact Mr. Michael O'Keefe, Licensing Manager at (603) 773-7745.

Sincerely,

NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC

Kevin T. Walsh

Site Vice President

S-&3(

NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, P.O. Box 300, Lafayette Road, Seabrook, NH 03874
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

SBK-L- 12129/Page 2

Enclosure: ASR at Seabrook Station - Shear and Lap Splice Testing

cc:

W. M. Dean, NRC Region I Administrator

J. G. Lamb, NRC Project Manager

W. J. Raymond, NRC Senior Resident Inspector

Mr. Christopher M. Pope, Director Homeland Security and Emergency

Management

New Hampshire Department of Safety

Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management

Bureau of Emergency Management

33 Hazen Drive

Concord, NH 03305

Mr. John Giarrusso, Jr., Nuclear Preparedness Manager

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Emergency Management Agency

400 Worcester Road

Framingham, MA 01702-5399
### SUBCHAPTER IV—MAJOR DISASTER ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS
No: 14-023 March 27, 2014

CONTACT: Ivonne Couret, 301-415-8200 

NRC Again Honored Among Top Supporters

of Historically Black Colleges and Universities

The 2014 annual survey conducted by U.S. Black Engineer & Information Technology

magazine lists the Nuclear Regulatory Commission as one of the government agencies considered most 

supportive of the engineering departments of Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU). 

The 12th annual survey is a result of a poll among deans of the accredited HBCU engineering 

programs and the corporate-academic alliance known as Advancing Minorities’ Interest in Engineering. 

“This is the seventh consecutive year the NRC has been recognized by U.S. Black Engineer &

Information Technology magazine for our support of the engineering departments of Historically Black 

Colleges and Universities,” said Vonna Ordaz, director of the NRC’s Office of Small Business and 

Civil Rights. “That’s quite an honor and credit for this recognition is due to the continuous efforts of 

NRC employees and our agency’s special programs.”
**CERTIFICATION      **

| 1.   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                     |                                                                                |                               |
|------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                                |                                                                           |                          |
| Date:               August 15, 2005 | By:                                                                       | /s/ Paul              T. Wood |
|                                     | Paul              T. Wood                                                           |
|                                     | Chairman,              Chief Executive Officer, President and              Director |
#### John J. Bechard, Respondent-Appellant, v. State of New York, Appellant-Respondent. Ann R. Bechard, Respondent-Appellant, v. State of New York, Appellant-Respondent.

(Claim No. 31287.)

(Claim No. 31288.)—

Cross appeals by each claimant and by the State in each claim from judgments of the Court of Claims in favor of the claimants. The claimants are husband and wife and the motor vehicle involved in the accident was owned by the husband who was present in it, but was being driven by the wife. The car was proceeding on a grade on a State highway approaching a bridge used as an overhead railroad crossing. There was wet snow “packed on the highway” and it was slippery. The car skidded across the highway, the rear end colliding with concrete guard posts pushing them over, and continued down the embankment. The Court of Claims has held that the State was negligent in the maintenance of the guard posts “in not providing a proper backfill which would give the concrete posts sufficient support and anchorage.” The husband’s testimony leaves a very considerable doubt in the record whether the condition of the guard posts, which is the only negligent act attributed by the Court of Claims to the State, has been shown to have had any causal association with his injuries. The wife’s injuries were sustained when the car went through the guardrailing and down the embankment, but the husband seems to have been out of the car before it went through the railing. If that is so, the negligence of the State in relation to the stability of the backfill has not been shown to have causal connection with his injuries. He was asked whether he was thrown out of the car “before it hit the guide rail or afterwards ” and to this he said that “ As soon as I heard ‘plunk’, I was out of the car”. He had hold of the handle of the door and “ it must be ” that the door came open. He went down the bank also, but it is clear-that he was not then in the car. He said “I wasn’t in the car * .* 51 if I rolled down or if I flew down or not, I found myself on the base of the hill ”, While we are of opinion that this record does not clearly demonstrate the husband’s injuries due to the negligence of the State as found, there is sufficient uncertainty in the record to suggest that there should be a new trial on this claim. Upon the new trial the husband would be entitled in any event to the damages to his car and for the medical and hospital services necessary for his *1104wife, but these items should be held aside until it is determined what the amount of the judgment should be. We regard the judgment of $2,500 in the wife’s ease as adequate. The judgment in the claim of John J. Bechard is reversed on the facts and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant State of New York to abide the event; and the judgment in the claim of Ann R. Bechard is affirmed, with costs. Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Imrie, JJ., concur.
§ 1018.28 Records and transcripts. ( a ) Subject to section 552 of title 5, United States Code (Freedom of Information Act) and 16 CFR part 1015 (Commission's Procedures for Disclosure or Production of Information under the Freedom of Information Act), the records, reports, transcripts, minutes, appendices, working papers, drafts, studies, agendas or other documents which were made available to or prepared for or by an advisory committee shall be made available for public inspection and copying in the Commission's Office of the Secretary.
( b ) Advisory Committee documents shall be made available until the advisory committee ceases to exist. Disposition of the advisory committee documents shall be determined by the Secretary of the Commission at that time.