alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 713.1 Prohibition on exports and imports of Schedule 2 chemicals to and from States not Party to the CWC. ( a ) You may not export any Schedule 2 chemical (see supplement no. 1 to this part) to any destination or import any Schedule 2 chemical from any destination other than a State Party to the Convention. See supplement no. 1 to part 710 of the CWCR for a list of States that are party to the Convention. Note to § 713.1 ( a
):
See § 742.18 of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) (15 CFR part 742) for prohibitions that apply to exports of Schedule 2 chemicals to States not Party to the CWC.
( b ) Paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to: ( 1 ) The export or import of a Schedule 2 chemical to or from a State not Party to the CWC by a department, agency, or other entity of the United States, or by any person, including a member of the Armed Forces of the United States, who is authorized by law, or by an appropriate officer of the United States to transfer or receive the Schedule 2 chemical;
( 2 ) Mixtures containing Schedule 2A chemicals, if the concentration of each Schedule 2A chemical in the mixture is 1% or less by weight (note, however, that such mixtures may be subject to the regulatory requirements of other federal agencies);
( 3 ) Mixtures containing Schedule 2B chemicals if the concentration of each Schedule 2B chemical in the mixture is 10% or less by weight (note, however, that such mixtures may be subject to the regulatory requirements of other federal agencies); or
( 4 ) Products identified as consumer goods packaged for retail sale for personal use or packaged for individual use.
### §6510. Manufacturers and regular dealers

(a) Prescribing Standards.—The Secretary may prescribe, in regulations, standards for determining whether a contractor is a manufacturer or regular dealer with respect to materials, supplies, articles, or equipment to be manufactured or furnished under, or used in the performance of, a contract entered into by an agency of the United States.

(b) Judicial Review.—An interested person has the right of judicial review of any legal question relating to interpretation of the terms "regular dealer" and "manufacturer" as defined pursuant to subsection (a).

(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3811.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6510 | 41:43b. | June 30, 1936, ch. 881, §11, as added Pub. L. 103–355, title VII, §7201(4), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3378; Pub. L. 104–106, div. D, title XLIII, §4321(f)(1)(A), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 675. |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "an agency of the United States" are substituted for "any executive department, independent establishment, or other agency or instrumentality of the United States, or by the District of Columbia, or by any corporation all the stock of which is beneficially owned by the United States" because of the definition in section 6501 of the revised title.
##### 



Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (Nos.
333-118610, 333-107466, 333-66676, 333-51656, and 333-48026) pertaining to
various stock incentive and option plans and in Registration Statements (Form
S-3, Nos. 333-119431, 333-112759 and 333-104305) of TeleCommunication Systems,
Inc. of our reports dated March 16, 2005, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedules of TeleCommunication Systems, Inc.,
Telecommunication Systems, Inc. managements assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting of TeleCommunication Systems, Inc. included in
this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of TeleCommunication Systems, Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 2005.



| | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
| | ---------------------

Baltimore, Maryland
March 16, 2006
§ 734.5 Activities of U.S. and foreign persons subject to the EAR. The following kinds of activities are subject to the EAR: ( a ) Specific activities of “U.S. persons,” wherever located, related to the proliferation of nuclear explosive devices, “missiles,” chemical or biological weapons, whole plants for chemical weapons precursors, and certain military-intelligence end uses and end users as described in § 744.6 of the EAR.
( b ) Activities of U.S. or foreign persons prohibited by any order issued under the EAR, including a Denial Order issued pursuant to part 766 of the EAR.
[61 FR 12746, Mar. 25, 1996, as amended at 61 FR 68578, Dec. 30, 1996; 64 FR 27141, May 18, 1999; 64 FR 47105, Aug. 30, 1999; 74 FR 52883, Oct. 15, 2009; 86 FR 4869, Jan. 15, 2021]
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Lawrence Ruden, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of PR Specialists, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  October 17, 2008

/s/ Lawrence Ruden

Lawrence Ruden

President (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Tranquility, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 (the Report), I, Dominick Pope, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations. Date: October 29, 2007 /s/Dominick Pope     President
Exhibit 32.21

Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, Darwin L. Stump, the Chief Financial Officer of Petroleum Development Corporation, Managing General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify that: 

- I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;
- the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

_/s/ Darwin L. Stump                  

Darwin L. Stump

Chief Financial Officer of the 

Managing General Partner of the Registrant

___May 13, 2004_________
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 21 (Thursday, January 31, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00344]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; PAR-17-270: NIDDK 
Central Repositories Non-renewable Sample Access (X01).
    Date: February 4, 2019.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Najma S. Begum, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, 
Room 7349, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 
594-8894, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3c5e595b4951527c525558585712525554125b534a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a2c0c7c5d7cfcce2cccbc6c6c98ccccbca8cc5cdd4">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in 
advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of 
December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 24, 2019.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-00344 Filed 1-30-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 227 (Friday, November 26, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 68951]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26109]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Bureau of Customs and Border Protection


Notice of Cancellation of Customs Broker License

AGENCY: Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Department of 
Homeland Security.

ACTION: General notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 641 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 
(19 U.S.C. 1641) and the Customs Regulations (19 CFR 111.51), the 
following Customs broker licenses are canceled without prejudice.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     License
               Name                 <greek-i>         Issuing port
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Evans, Wood and Mooring, Inc.....        11425  Los Angeles.
South Florida Customs Brokers,           16898  Miami.
 Inc.
ADCO I.T.S., Inc.................        14361  Laredo.
MEC Transport Services Corp......        13618  Los Angeles.
J.H. Bachmann, Inc...............        11765  New York.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Dated: November 15, 2004.
Jayson P. Ahern,
Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field Operations.
[FR Doc. 04-26109 Filed 11-24-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
AMENDMENT NO





Exhibit
(10)(o)(5)


 


AMENDMENT NO. 4


TO


ALLTEL CORPORATION 401(k)
PLAN


(January 1, 2001
Restatement)


 


WHEREAS, ALLTEL
Corporation (the “Company”) maintains the ALLTEL Corporation 401(k) Plan, as
amended and restated effective January 1, 2001, and as subsequently amended,
(the “Plan”); and


 


WHEREAS, the
Company desires further to amend the Plan;


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
the Company hereby amends the Plan in the respects hereinafter set forth:


 


Effective as of
January 1, 2003, Appendix B is amended by adding a new subsection (g) to the
end thereof to provide as follows:


 


(g)           For
the 2003 Plan Year, each person who


 


(i)            was
an active employee of Cellular XL Associates, L.P. and became an Employee on
March 1, 2003; or


 


(ii)           was
an active employee of Western Wireless Corporation and became an Employee on
September 1, 2003.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company, by its duly
authorized officer, has caused this Amendment to be executed on this 10th day
of December, 2003.


 


	
   

  	
  ALLTEL CORPORATION

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Scott T. Ford

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  President & CEO
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the annual report of Worldwide Manufacturing USA, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Jimmy Wang, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Jimmy Wang

Chief Executive Officer

Date:  April 14, 2008
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL**

**EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Bekem Metals, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Yermek Kudabayev, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Date:  May 15, 2008 | By: | /s/ Yermek Kudabayev |  
 

Yermek Kudabayev

 

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

  |
|---------------------|-----|----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
U.S. Access Board: Rail Vehicles Access Advisory Committee

Subcommittee on Boarding and Alighting

June 25, 2014

1:00 – 3:00 Eastern

1.0 Introductions

2.0 Approval of the Agenda

3.0 Discussion of subcommittee scope and objectives 

4.0 Discussion on boarding and alighting methods

4.1 Discuss boarding methods and appropriate mode, in probable order of preference to 

accommodate the needs of people with disabilities. Note: Many of these methods 

could be used in conjunction with a bridge plate.

A. Full platform level boarding

B. Set-back platforms

C. Car-borne lifts

D. Mini-high platforms

E. Station-based mobile lifts 

5.0 Discussion on boarding and alighting devices

5.1 Review of current law and regulations and begin development of recommendations

A. Lifts

B. Ramps

C. Bridge plate

6.0 Planning 

6.1 Develop action items 

6.2 Assign duties and tasks 

6.3 Establish deadlines for deliverables

Attachments
#### John Servino, Appellant, v. Jean Servino, Respondent.

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment which (1) dismisses his first cause of action for a decree adjudging that he is a one-half owner of a parcel of property, title to which was taken in the name of defendant, his wife; and (2) limits his recovery on the second cause of action to $2,190.40, instead of awarding him $2,400, or one half of the total sum of $4,800 withdrawn by defendant from a savings account in the joint names of plaintiff and defendant. Judgment modified on the law and the facts by (1) striking therefrom the first two decretal paragraphs; (2) striking from the third decretal paragraph the words and figures *“*Two Thousand One Hundred Ninety and 40/100 ($2,190.40) ” and by substituting therefor the words and figures “ Two Thousand Four Hundred Dollars ($2,400) ”, The two causes of action in the complaint are severed, and a new trial is granted with respect to the first cause of action. As so modified, the judgment is affirmed, with costs to appellant to abide the event of the new trial with respect to the first cause of action. The finding in favor of respondent on the first cause of action is against the weight of the credible evidence. As to the second cause of action, findings of fact inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings are made as indicated herein. The proof establishes that the moneys in the joint account involved in the second cause of action belonged to both appellant and respondent equally. Therefore, appellant is entitled to one half of such moneys. Wenzel, Schmidt and Beldoek, JJ., concur; Nolan, P. J., and Adel, J., concur in the modification of the judgment with respect to the second cause of action but dissent as to the modification and the granting of a new trial with respect to the first cause of action, and, as to said first cause of action, vote to affirm the judgment, with the following memorandum: The finding in favor of respondent, in our opinion, is not against the weight of the evidence. If it be assumed, however, that appellant furnished a portion, or *777even all, of the money used to purchase the real property which is the subject of this alleged cause of action, he was, nevertheless, not entitled to a judgment. There was no believable evidence that the conveyance of the house to appellant’s wife and the taking of title in her name was without appellant’s consent or knowledge, nor was there any evidence that she agreed to hold the property in trust or to consider him a half owner. Apparently the taking of title in the wife’s name was what was contemplated by the parties, and if such was the case, it is not material that appellant did not understand the legal effect of the transaction. The investment of the money in the house, under the circumstances disclosed, indicated a gift to the wife, and was such in law, and no trust results in the husband’s favor. (Real Property Law, § 94; *Weigert*v. *Schlesinger,*150 App. Div. 765, affd. 210 N. Y. 573.)
*Figure 5.  Percentages of Females Aged 12 or Older Reporting Past Month Cigarette Use,by Time Period and Geographic Area:  2000 and 2001.*  Chapter 2's Figure 5 is a bar chart illustrating the percentage of females aged 12 or older reporting cigarette use during the past month, by time period and geographic area in 2000 and 2001.  It shows that the rate of cigarette use among females from the NY CMSA declined slightly in 2001, from 21.4 percent in the first three quarters to 19.8 percent in the fourth.

Click here to return to Figure 5
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

N OTICE TO F ILE T HIRD S UPPLEMENTAL C LERK ’ S R ECORD

Appellate case name: Patrick Olajide Akinwamide v. Transportation Insurance Company, CNA Insurance Company, and Automatic Data Processing Inc.

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 5

- 00 066

- CV

Trial court case number: 1997

- 48526

Trial court: 80th District Court of Harris County

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(c), the district cle rk is

directed to file a third supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified cop y of the findings of fact and conclusions of law, filed on November 12, 201 5

.

The third s upplemental clerk’s record shall be filed with the Clerk of the First Court of Appeals in the above

- referenced appellate cause number 01

- 1 5

- 00 066

- CV

within 10 days of the date of this notice. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 34.5(c)(1) , (3)

.

The cost of preparing this record will be assessed as part of the costs of this appeal upon issuance of this Court’s judgment.

Clerk’s signature: Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the Court

Date: December 10, 2015
### Part B—Energy Efficiency in Federal Agencies