alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §18103. Research and development

(a) Support for Research.—The Administrator of General Services, in consultation with the Federal Communications Commission, shall seek to promote research by federal agencies, state agencies, and private entities to reduce the cost and improve the capabilities of telecommunications devices and systems that provide accessibility to hearing-impaired and speech-impaired individuals.

(b) Planning To Assimilate Technological Developments.—In planning future alterations to and modifications of the federal telecommunications system, the Administrator shall take into account—

(1) modifications that the Administrator determines are necessary to achieve the objectives of section 18102(a) of this title; and

(2) technological improvements in telecommunications devices and systems that provide accessibility to hearing-impaired and speech-impaired individuals.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1291.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 18103 | 40:762b. | Pub. L. 100–542, §4, Oct. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 2722. |

Section

Subsection (b)(1) is substituted for "results of the analysis required by section 762a(b)(3) of this title" because 40:762a(b)(3), which is omitted as executed and obsolete (see the revision note for section 18102(b) of the revised title), provided for an analysis and report regarding modifications that the Administrator determined were necessary to achieve the objectives of 40:762a(a), which is restated in section 18102(a) of the revised title.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Claude Rizzicone Jr., Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[820 NYS2d 673]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 12, 2005, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance *1057benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment at an auto body shop without good cause. Claimant testified that he resigned from his employment because he felt that his abilities and efforts were not appreciated. Although he did receive some criticism at work, the record establishes that continuing work was available. Inasmuch as dissatisfaction with one’s work environment does not constitute good cause for leaving employment *(see Matter of Kohen [Commissioner of Labor],*17 AD3d 955, 956 [2005]; *Matter of Sawastynowicz [Hudacs],*182 AD2d 926, 926 [1992]), we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision. Claimant’s contention that he quit due to a disability is unsupported inasmuch as there is no evidence in the record that he was medically advised to leave. Furthermore, although the record indicates that claimant resigned in order to avoid any reduction of his Social Security benefits, this does not constitute good cause for leaving employment *(see Matter of Balla [Sweeney],*227 AD2d 787 [1996]).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
§ 930.129 Dismissal, remand, stay, and procedural override. ( a ) The Secretary may dismiss an appeal for good cause. A dismissal is the final agency action. Good cause shall include, but is not limited to: ( 1 ) Failure of the appellant to submit a notice of appeal within the required 30-day period.
( 2 ) Failure of the appellant to submit a brief or supporting materials within the required period;
( 3 ) Failure of the appellant to pay a required fee;
( 4 ) Denial by the Federal agency of the federal license, permit or assistance application; or
( 5 ) Failure of the appellant to base the appeal on grounds that the proposed activity is either consistent with the objectives or purposes of the Act, or necessary in the interest of national security.
( b ) If the State agency's consistency objection is not in compliance with section 307 of the Act and the regulations contained in subparts D, E, F, or I of this part, the Secretary shall override the State's objection. The Secretary may make this determination as a threshold matter.
( c ) The Secretary may stay the processing of an appeal in accordance with § 930.130.
( d ) The Secretary may remand an appeal to the State agency for reconsideration of the project's consistency with the enforceable policies of the State's management program if significant new information relevant to the State agency's objection, not previously provided to the State agency during its consistency review, is submitted to the Secretary. The Secretary shall determine a time period for the remand to the State agency. The time period for remand must be completed within the period described in § 930.130 for the development of the Secretary's decision record. If the State agency responds that it still objects to the activity, then the Secretary shall continue to process the appeal. If the State agency concurs that the activity is consistent with the enforceable policies of the State's management program, then the Secretary shall declare the appeal moot and notify the Federal agency that the activity may be federally approved.
[65 FR 77154, Dec. 8, 2000, as amended at 71 FR 831, Jan. 5, 2006]
### Part G—Partnerships for Energy Security and Innovation
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

Puget Sound & Pacific Railroad ) ASBCA No. 63062

)

Under Contract No. N4425513RP00011 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT : Meghan A. Douris, Esq.

Oles Morrison Rinker & Baker LLP

Seattle, WA

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Craig D. Jensen, Esq.

Navy Chief Trial Attorney

Joshua S. Kauke, Esq.

Trial Attorney

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: January 19 , 2022

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63062

, Appeal of Puget Sound &

Pacific Railroad , rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: January 21, 2022 JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Oliver Hunter, Appellant.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, convicting him of the crime of assault in the second degree, and from the sentence, and from the order denying his motion for a new trial. Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial ordered. No questions of fact have been presented to or decided by this court. In view of the evidence that the shotgun was discharged into the ground, the jury, under appropriate instructions, might have found that the element of intent referred to in section 242 of the Penal Law was not present but that there was guilt of third degree assault nevertheless. The request to charge different degrees of the crime should have been granted to the extent of charging with respect to assault in the third degree. There was no error in refusing to grant the request to charge that there must be an intent to both wound and inflict grevious bodily harm. No separate appeal lies from the sentence or from the order denying the motion *723for a new trial, which have been reviewed on the appeal from the judgment. (Code Grim. Pro., § 517.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, MaeCrate and Beldock, JJ., concur.
### §531. Requirements relating to naming of Department property

(a) Naming Limitation.—Except as expressly provided by law or as authorized under subsection (b), a facility, structure, or real property of the Department, and a major portion (such as a wing or floor) of any such facility, structure, or real property, may be named only for the geographic area in which the facility, structure, or real property is located.

(b) Transfer of Names.—

(1) In general.—The Secretary may transfer the name of covered property of the Department to other covered property of the Department if—

(A) the original covered property was designated with that name by law;

(B) the Department no longer offers benefits or services at the original covered property;

(C) the other covered property is similar in type and purpose as the original covered property;

(D) the other covered property is located in a different location or at a different address from the original covered property within the town, city, or other local government area specified in the designation made by such law; and

(E) such transfer occurs not less than 30 days after the Secretary notifies the Committee on Veterans' Affairs of the Senate, the Committee on Veterans' Affairs of the House of Representatives, and each member of Congress representing the State in which the original covered property and other covered property are located of the intent of the Secretary to transfer the name of the original covered property to the other covered property.

(2) References.—If the Secretary transfers the name of covered property under paragraph (1), any reference in a law, regulation, map, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the covered property originally named by law shall be deemed to be a reference to the covered property to which the name has been transferred under such paragraph.

(3) Covered property.—In this subsection, the term "covered property" means a facility, structure, or real property of the Department or a major portion (such as a wing or floor) of any such facility, structure, or real property.

(Added Pub. L. 105–368, title X, §1001(a)(1), Nov. 11, 1998, 112 Stat. 3363; amended Pub. L. 117–137, §1(a), June 7, 2022, 136 Stat. 1254.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–137, §1(a)(2), (3), designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, inserted "or as authorized under subsection (b)" after "Except as expressly provided by law", and added subsec. (b).

Pub. L. 117–137, §1(a)(1), substituted "Requirements" for "Requirement" in section catchline.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 105–368, title X, §1001(b), Nov. 11, 1998, 112 Stat. 3363, provided that: "Section 531 of title 38, United States Code, as added by subsection (a)(1), shall apply with respect to the assignment or designation of the name of a facility, structure, or real property of the Department of Veterans Affairs (or of a major portion thereof) after the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 11, 1998]."
Editorial Note on Subpart D of Part 9701
Editorial Note: At 73 FR 58435, Oct. 7, 2008, the application of subpart D to part 9701 was rescinded.

§ 9701.402 Coverage. ( a ) This subpart applies to eligible DHS employees in the categories listed in paragraph (b) of this section, subject to a determination by the Secretary or designee under § 9701.102(b), except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section.
( b ) The following employees are eligible for coverage under this subpart: ( 1 ) Employees who would otherwise be covered by 5 U.S.C. chapter 43; and
( 2 ) Employees who were excluded from chapter 43 by OPM under 5 CFR 430.202(d) prior to the date of coverage of this subpart, as determined under § 9701.102(b).
( c ) This subpart does not apply to employees who are not expected to be employed longer than a minimum period (as defined in § 9701.404) during a single 12-month period.
Order entered August 3, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00133-CR

ESTEBAN GARCIA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 366-83445-2016

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s July 31, 2018 second motion for extension of time to file 

his brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief due on or before August 14, 2018.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
### §2006. Relationship between the Treasury and the Postal Service

(a) At least 15 days before selling any issue of obligations under section 2005 or 2011 of this title, the Postal Service shall advise the Secretary of the Treasury of the amount, proposed date of sale, maturities, terms and conditions, and expected maximum rates of interest of the proposed issue in appropriate detail and shall consult with him or his designee thereon. The Secretary may elect to purchase such obligations under such terms, including rates of interest, as he and the Postal Service may agree, but at a rate of yield no less than the prevailing yield on outstanding marketable Treasury securities of comparable maturity, as determined by the Secretary. If the Secretary does not purchase such obligations, the Postal Service may proceed to issue and sell them to a party or parties other than the Secretary upon notice to the Secretary and upon consultation as to the date of issuance, maximum rates of interest, and other terms and conditions.

(b) Subject to the conditions of subsection (a) of this section, the Postal Service may require the Secretary of the Treasury to purchase obligations of the Postal Service under section 2005 in such amounts as will not cause the holding by the Secretary of the Treasury resulting from such required purchases to exceed $2,000,000,000 at any one time. This subsection shall not be construed as limiting the authority of the Secretary to purchase obligations of the Postal Service under section 2005 in excess of such amount.

(c) Notwithstanding section 2005(d)(5) or 2011(e)(4)(E) of this title, obligations issued by the Postal Service shall be obligations of the Government of the United States, and payment of principal and interest thereon shall be fully guaranteed by the Government of the United States, such guaranty being expressed on the face thereof, if and to the extent that—

(1) the Postal Service requests the Secretary of the Treasury to pledge the full faith and credit of the Government of the United States for the payment of principal and interest thereon; and

(2) the Secretary, in his discretion, determines that it would be in the public interest to do so.

(Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 741; Pub. L. 109–435, title IV, §401(b)(4), Dec. 20, 2006, 120 Stat. 3225.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 109–435, §401(b)(4)(A), inserted "or 2011" after "section 2005" in first sentence.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 109–435, §401(b)(4)(B), inserted "under section 2005" before "in such amounts" in first sentence and before "in excess of such amount." in second sentence.

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 109–435, §401(b)(4)(C), inserted "or 2011(e)(4)(E)" after "section 2005(d)(5)".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1971, pursuant to Resolution No. 71–9 of the Board of Governors. See section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note preceding section 101 of this title.
J. Appellant pleaded guilty while represented by counsel and assisted by a court interpreter. During the court's canvass, appellant confirmed that the interpreter had done a site translation of the guilty plea agreement for him and that he thoroughly understood all of the contents of the written agreement, which included separate sections addressing the stipulated sentences and the possible immigration consequences of his plea. We discern no abuse of discretion by the district court in denying appellant's presentence motion to withdraw his guilty plea. See Rubio v. State, 124 Nev. 1032, 1040, 194 P.3d 1224, 1229-30 (2008); Crawford v. State, 117 at 721-22, 30 P.3d at 1125-26. Accordingly,

we ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

CAI i v lo
, 

### J. Douglas

Saitta

cc: Hon. Valorie J. Vega, District Judge Clark County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

2
Exhibit 13.2

906 Certification

Securities and Exchange
Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In connection with the periodic report of NetEase.com, Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Onward Choi, the Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of
the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certificate has
not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: June 29, 2010



|       |  |                               
|------ |  | ------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Onward Choi               
|Name:  |  | Onward Choi                   
|Title: |  | Acting Chief Financial Officer
NRC MAKES PREPARATIONS FOR APPROACH OF HURRICANE IRENE; 

DISPATCHES ADDITIONAL INSPECTORS TO NUCLEAR PLANTS

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is making preparations for the approaching 

Hurricane Irene at its headquarters operations center in Rockville, Md., and two of its incident 

response centers in Atlanta, Ga. and King of Prussia, Pa. The agency has also dispatched 

additional personnel to those nuclear power plants likely to be in the storm’s path. Other 

inspectors are on standby. Those dispatched will assist the NRC resident inspectors already 

stationed at those facilities. 

The nuclear plants with additional staff include: Brunswick near Southport, N.C., Surry 

in Surry, Va., Calvert Cliffs in Lusby, Md., Hope Creek/Salem in Hancocks Bridge, N.J., Oyster 

Creek in Forked River, N.J., Pilgrim in Plymouth, Mass., Millstone in Waterford, Ct., Seabrook 

in Seabrook, N.H., and Indian Point in Buchanan, N.Y. The agency is also monitoring Global 

Nuclear Fuels-Americas, LLC, in Wilmington, N.C.

NRC inspectors have verified that the plants have made the necessary preparations for 

Hurricane Irene. The agency has pre-positioned staff to monitor events and respond before, 

during and after the storm. Actions have been taken to ensure continuous communications with 

NRC-licensed facilities along the projected path of the storm.

The NRC’s regional offices have already made sure that appropriate equipment, 

including satellite phones, are available and operational. Before hurricane season even begins, 

the staff ensures that hurricane response training, computer programs and emergency contact 

information are all up to date. NRC inspectors also confirm that nuclear power plants in 

hurricane-prone areas have completed their extensive hurricane preparations.

All the reactors are operating at full power, but the plants' procedures require that they 

shut down prior to any predicted hurricane force winds on site. The plants' emergency diesel 

generators are available if off-site power is lost during the storm. All plants have flood protection 

above the predicted storm surge, and key components and systems also are housed in watertight 

buildings capable of withstanding hurricane force winds and flooding.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-159 August 26, 2011
The agency is continuously tracking Hurricane Irene using the resources of all federal 

agencies and several weather forecasting services.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website.
#### § 971.600 General.

The Act contains several provisions which relate to environmental protection. For example, section 105(a)(4) requires that, before the Administrator may issue a commercial recovery permit, he must find that the commercial recovery proposed in the application cannot reasonably be expected to result in a significant adverse environmental effect. In addition, each permit issued must contain TCRs which prescribe actions the permittee must take in the conduct of commercial recovery activities to assure protection of the environment (section 109(b)). The Act also provides for modification by the Administrator of any TCR if relevant data and information indicate that modification is required to protect the quality of the environment (section 105(c)(1)(B)). The Administrator also may order an immediate suspension or modification of activities (section 106(c)), or require use of best available technologies (section 109(b)), to prevent a significant adverse environmental effect. Furthermore, each permit issued under the Act must require the permittee to monitor the environmental effects of commercial recovery activities in accordance with guidelines issued by the Administrator, and to submit information the Administrator finds necessary and appropriate to assess environmental effects and to develop and evaluate possible methods of mitigating adverse effects (section 114).
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2433

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to provide veterans who participated in certain Department of 

Defense chemical and biological warfare testing to be provided health 

care for illness without requirement for proof of service-connection. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 11, 2003

Mr. RODRIGUEZ (for himself and Mr. SIMMONS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide veterans who 

participated in certain Department of Defense chemical 

and biological warfare testing to be provided health care 

for illness without requirement for proof of service-connection.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health Care for Vet5 erans of Project 112/Project SHAD Act of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 2433 IH 

1 SEC. 2. PROVISION OF HEALTH CARE TO VETERANS WHO 

2 PARTICIPATED IN CERTAIN DEPARTMENT OF 

3 DEFENSE CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WAR4 FARE TESTING. 

5 Section 1710(e) of title 38, United States Code, is 

6 amended—

7 (1) in paragraph (1), by adding at the end the 

8 following new clause: 

9 ‘‘(E) Subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), a veteran 

10 who participated in a test conducted by the Department 

11 of Defense Deseret Test Center as part of a program for 

12 chemical and biological warfare testing from 1962 through 

13 1973 (including the program designated as ‘Project Ship14 board Hazard and Defense (SHAD)’ and related land15 based tests) is eligible for hospital care, medical services, 

16 and nursing home care under subsection (a)(2)(F) for any 

17 illness, notwithstanding that there is insufficient medical 

18 evidence to conclude that such illness is attributable to 

19 such testing.’’. 

20 (2) in paragraph (2)(B), by striking out ‘‘sub21 paragraph (1)(C) or (1)(D)’’ and inserting ‘‘sub22 paragraph (C), (D), or (E) of paragraph (1)’’; and 

23 (3) in paragraph (3)—

24 (A) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of sub25 paragraph (B); 
3

•HR 2433 IH 

1 (B) by striking the period at the end of 

2 subparagraph (C) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

3 (C) by adding at the end the following new 

4 subparagraph: 

5 ‘‘(D) in the case of care for a veteran described 

6 in paragraph (1)(E), after December 31, 2005.’’.

Æ