alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of
ADA-ES, Inc. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I, Michael D. Durham, certify that:
In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of ADA-ES, Inc.
(the "Company) for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Michael D. Durham, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

/s/ Michael D. Durham
---------------------
Name: Michael D. Durham
Title: President
Date: November 4, 2004


I, Mark H. McKinnies, certify that:
In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of ADA-ES, Inc.
(the "Company) for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Mark H. McKinnies, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.


/s/ Mark H. McKinnies
---------------------
Name: Mark H. McKinnies
Title: CFO
Date: November 4, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Genaissance Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended
December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Ben Kaplan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

|Date: March 15, 2005 |  | /s/BEN KAPLANBen Kaplan Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
LAND MARKET REFORM IN GEORGIA IS UNDER WAY

----

20 JAN 99
SCWC-12-0000897 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs. CIERRA ANN M. KAM, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000897; CASE NO. 1DTA-12-00359) ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Reck tenwald, C.J., Nak ayama, Mc Kenna, Po llack, an d Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Cierra Ann M. Kam’s application for writ of certiorari filed on February 19, 2015, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai # i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, April 2, 2015. Taryn R. Tomasa for petitioner Brian R. Vincent for respondent /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000897 02-APR-2015 07:56 AM
### Fw: Alternative threshold for NO 2 near-road monitors for your discussion at 2:30 Lisa Heinzerling to:Mancini, Dominic J., hking 01/20/2010 11:04 AM
Cc: Lydia Wegman, Richard Wayland, Lewis Weinstock, Nealson Watkins, Padmini Singh, Tricia Crabtree, Scott Jenkins, Charlotte Bertrand Dom and Heidi, EPA does not support the alternative threshold described in the email below. Lisa

----- Forwarded by Charlotte Bertrand/DC/USEPA/US on 01/19/2010 01:18 PM -----

From: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US To: dmancini@omb.eop.gov, Heidi King <hking@omb.eop.gov> Cc: Richard Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lewis Weinstock/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Nealson Watkins/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Padmini Singh/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Tricia Crabtree/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Scott Jenkins/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Charlotte Bertrand/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 01/19/2010 01:07 PM Subject: Alternative threshold for NO2 near-road monitors for your discussion at 2:30 Dom and Heidi, I spoke with my management. We are willing to put forward an alternative threshold for the first tier of the near-road monitoring network for you to discuss with your management at your 2:30 meeting. The alternative would use a threshold of 500,000 people, rather than 350,000 people, in determining the number of required monitors for the first tier of the near-road network. This means that areas of 500,000 or more population would be required to have one near-road monitor, for a total of 102 monitors, compared to the 143 monitors which would be required if we used the threshold of 350,000 people. The second tier of the near-road network, which requires an additional monitor in CBSAs of 2,500,000 people or more or an area which has one or more road segments with an AADT over 250,000, would remain unchanged. This means that the total number of required near-road monitors would be 126, rather than 167. Please let me know if you have any questions about this alternative. We hope that if this approach works for you that we can close out this discussion today. I would appreciate it if one of you would call me after your 2:30 meeting and let me know if we have an agreement. Thanks. Lydia
Flue Gas Heat Capacity assuming 100% saturated with water after wet scrubber

Calculation basis 1,000 scf total flue gas (wet)

Vol % lbs

Mass

Fraction

Individual Cp*

btu/lb-deg f

flue gas Cp

btu/lb-deg f

Dry Flue Gas 90% 67.79 0.935 0.255 0.239

Water 10% 4.68 0.065 0.510 0.033

Total 100% 72.47 1.000 0.271

* assume air for dry flue gas

Cp's from fig 3-12 Perry's 5th ed.

Control Efficiency for 2nd Scrubber

Controlled Emission Rate after 1st Scrubber 2,749.7 t/yr (UTAC emission rates)

Control Efficiency 1st Scrubber 50%

Uncontrolled Emission Rate 5,499.4 t/yr

Overall Control Efficiency 80%

Overall Emission Rate 1,099.9 t/yr

Amount Removed by 2nd Scrubber 1,649.8 t/yr

2nd Scrubber Efficiency 60%
# L_2014170EN.01000103.xml

| 11.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 170/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 170/1

---

Information relating to the provisional application of an Additional Protocol to the Agreement between the Kingdom of Norway and the European Union on a Norwegian Financial Mechanism for the period 2009-2014 consequent to the participation of the Republic of Croatia in the European Economic Area

The completion of the procedures necessary for the provisional application of an Additional Protocol to the Agreement between the Kingdom of Norway and the European Union on a Norwegian Financial Mechanism for the period 2009-2014 consequent to the participation of the Republic of Croatia in the European Economic Area (1), signed in Brussels on 11 April 2014, having taken place on 11 April 2014, the Protocol is applied on a provisional basis since 12 April 2014.

1

---

(1)  See page 5 of this Official Journal.

1

---
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Vincent Sokolowsky, Deceased. Paul Kokoshen et al., Appellants; Public Administrator of the County of New York, as Administrator of the Estate of Vincent Sokolowsky, Deceased, Respondent.

No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Anthony Simpson, Appellant, v Warden of Rikers Island Correctional Facility, Respondent, and New York State Division of Parole, Respondent.

[822 NYS2d 496]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Judith Lieb, J.), entered June 21, 2005, which dismissed petitioner’s writ of habeas corpus, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The hearing officer was willing to accommodate petitioner’s request for his girlfriend to testify as a witness, despite petitioner’s failure to give proper notice and his counsel’s admitted failure to prepare the necessary paperwork to allow her into the prison premises. However, the request was withdrawn after the parole officer opted not to proceed on the charge as to which the proposed witness was expected to testify. No request was made that she be allowed to testify as to the second charge. This was enough to satisfy the “flexible” procedural requirements applicable *(see Morillo v City of New York,*178 AD2d 7, 12 [1992], *appeal dismissed*79 NY2d 1039 [1992], *lv denied*80 NY2d 752 [1992]). Concur — Buckley, P.J., Saxe, Williams, Sweeny and Malone, JJ.
### §404a. Specific limitations

(a) Except as specifically authorized by law, the Postal Service may not—

(1) establish any rule or regulation (including any standard) the effect of which is to preclude competition or establish the terms of competition unless the Postal Service demonstrates that the regulation does not create an unfair competitive advantage for itself or any entity funded (in whole or in part) by the Postal Service;

(2) compel the disclosure, transfer, or licensing of intellectual property to any third party (such as patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets, and proprietary information); or

(3) obtain information from a person that provides (or seeks to provide) any product, and then offer any postal service that uses or is based in whole or in part on such information, without the consent of the person providing that information, unless substantially the same information is obtained (or obtainable) from an independent source or is otherwise obtained (or obtainable).

(b) The Postal Regulatory Commission shall prescribe regulations to carry out this section.

(c) Any party (including an officer of the Commission representing the interests of the general public) who believes that the Postal Service has violated this section may bring a complaint in accordance with section 3662.

(Added Pub. L. 109–435, title IV, §403(a), Dec. 20, 2006, 120 Stat. 3226.)
### SUBCHAPTER II—GENERAL AUTHORITY AND ADMINISTRATION

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior subchapter II of this chapter consisting of sections 4121 to 4124, related to Regional Medical Education Centers, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §401(a)(3), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 210. See Prior Provisions notes set out under section 4114 of this title.
Issue Date: 12/19/2011 - 1 - 11-041 

 NRC INSPECTION MANUAL DIRS

Change Notice 11-041 

 DELETED: TRANSMITTED: 

 Number Date Number Date

1. TI 2515/183 03/23/11 

2. TI 2515/184 04/29/11 

3. TI 2515/185 Rev 1 11/23/11 TI 2515/185 12/19/11 

4. IP 65001.22 12/19/11 

TRAINING: None 

REMARKS: TI 2515/183: (Followup to the Fukushima Daiichi Fuel Damage Event) 

 This TI is being deleted, as the objectives of the TI have been met. 

 TI 2515/184: (Availability and Readiness Inspection of Severe Accident 

Management Guidelines (SAMGs)) This TI is being deleted, as the 

objectives of the TI have been met. 

TI 2515/185, Rev 1: (Reserved for Followup to the Review of the 

Implementation of the Industry Ground Water Protection Voluntary 

Initiative) Revision issued to add plant in Section 03.02 that was 

inadvertently left off the list of plants. 

IP 65001.22 (Inspection of Digital Instrumentation and Control (DI&C) 

System/Software Design Acceptance Criteria (DAC) – Related to ITAAC) 

This is a new procedure. 

DISTRIBUTION: Standard 

END
### §12441. Grants to protect the privacy and confidentiality of victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking

The Attorney General, through the Director of the Office on Violence Against Women, may award grants under this part to States, Indian tribes, territories, or local agencies or nonprofit, nongovernmental organizations to ensure that personally identifying information of adult, youth, and child victims of domestic violence, sexual violence, stalking, and dating violence shall not be released or disclosed to the detriment of such victimized persons.

(Pub. L. 103–322, title IV, §41101, as added Pub. L. 109–162, title I, §107, Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 2983.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 14043b of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
Editorial Note on Subpart A of Part 9701
Editorial Note: At 73 FR 58435, Oct. 7, 2008, the application of subpart A to part 9701 was rescinded.

§ 9701.103 Definitions. In this part: *Authorized agency official* means the Secretary or an official who is authorized to act for the Secretary in the matter concerned.
*Coordination* means the process by which DHS, after appropriate staff-level consultation, officially provides OPM with notice of a proposed action and intended effective date. If OPM concurs, or does not respond to that notice within 30 calendar days, DHS may proceed with the proposed action. However, if OPM indicates the matter has Governmentwide implications or consequences, DHS will not proceed until the matter is resolved. The coordination process is intended to give due deference to the flexibilities afforded DHS by the Homeland Security Act and the regulations in this part, without compromising OPM's institutional responsibility, as codified in 5 U.S.C. chapter 11 and Executive Order 13197 of January 18, 2001, to provide Governmentwide oversight in human resources management programs and practices.
Department or DHS means the Department of Homeland Security.
*Director* means the Director of the Office of Personnel Management.
*Employee* means an employee within the meaning of that term in 5 U.S.C. 2105.
General Schedule or GS means the General Schedule classification and pay system established under chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of title 5, U.S. Code.
*Implementing directives* means directives issued at the Departmental level by the Secretary or designee to carry out any policy or procedure established in accordance with this part. These directives may apply Departmentwide or to any part of the Department as determined by the Secretary at his or her sole and exclusive discretion.
*OPM* means the Office of Personnel Management.
*Secretary* means the Secretary of Homeland Security or, as authorized, the Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security.
Secretary or designee means the Secretary or a DHS official authorized to act for the Secretary in the matter concerned who serves as— ( 1 ) The Undersecretary for Management; or
( 2 ) The Chief Human Capital Officer for DHS.
|         |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|---------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| • | the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2020 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|         |                                                                                                                                                      |
|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| • | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |
| Dated: | May 4, 2020 | By   | /s/ Albert J. Miralles |   |
|   |   |   | Albert J. Miralles |   |
|   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer  |   |
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MARLON GRANT,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-3473

[January 25, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael Lynch, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 05-013624 CF10A.

Marlon Grant, Pahokee, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., WARNER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
exv10w4



 







    Exhibit 10.4



 


	 	 	 	 	 
	
 
	
 
	
    CONFIDENTIAL
    TREATMENT
	
 
	
    
    

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
    Amgen USA, Inc.
    

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
    One Amgen Center Drive
    

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
    Thousand Oaks, CA 91320-1799
    

	

    March 22, 2007
    


	
 
	
 
	
 
	
    805-447-1000
    

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
    www.amgen.com
    










    Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc.




    920 Winter Street




    Waltham, MA 02451




    Attn: Robert McGorty



 



    Re: Amendment No. 3 to Sourcing & Supply
    Agreement No. 200600447 dated October 1, 2006



 



    Dear Mr. McGorty:



 



    This letter has been written to evidence the agreement reached
    by Amgen USA Inc. (“Amgen”) and Fresenius Medical Care
    Holdings, Inc. (“FMCH”) to modify and formally amend
    the above-referenced Agreement (the “Agreement”) by
    and between Amgen and FMCH for the purchase of
    EPOGEN®
    and
    Aranesp®
    effective October 1, 2006. Unless otherwise specifically
    defined in this letter, each term used herein shall have the
    meaning assigned to such term in the Agreement.



 



    [*]



 



    [*]



 



    If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to
    contact your Account Manager, Keith Woods at
    (800) 232-9997
    ext 38152. We look forward to receiving a signed copy of this
    amendment letter.



 



    Sincerely,



 








    AMGEN USA, INC.



 



    
    

    




    Neil Bankston




    Executive Director, Pricing & Contracts



 


 


		
	    Agreement
    No. 200600447 — Amend No. 3
    	     Ver.
    FMCHA3_032207f.DOC
    



		
	    ACIS 10518
    	    Fax
    No. 805-376-8558       
    




    

    1








 







    CONFIDENTIAL
    TREATMENT



 



    ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:



 



    Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc.



 



    /s/  Ronald
    J. Kuerbitz








    Name: Ronald J. Kuerbitz



			
	 	    Title:   
	
    Executive Vice President




 



    Date: March 29, 2007



 



    Amgen Inc.



 



    /s/  Helen
    Torley








    Name: Helen Torley



			
	 	    Title:   
	
    Vice President and General Manager




 



    Date: April 23, 2007



 


 


		
	    cc: 	
    Amgen Inc. General Counsel





    Keith Woods




    Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. — General Counsel



 








    ***



 



    (see attached file: FMCHA3_Addendum D_032207F)



 


 


		
	    Agreement
    No. 200600447 — Amend No. 3
    	     Ver.
    FMCHA3_032207f.DOC
    



		
	    ACIS 10518
    	    Fax
    No. 805-376-8558       
    




    

    2








 






    CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT



 



    ***
#### Doretha E. Reaves, Appellant, v Wegmans Food Markets, Inc., Respondent.

[821 NYS2d 510]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (William P. Polito, J.), entered June 1, 2005 in a personal injury action. The order granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court. Present — Gorski, J.P., Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.
#### Noel Baker, Appellant, v David Baker, Respondent.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[822 NYS2d 200]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County (Michael F. Griffith, A.J.), entered August 3, 2005 in a divorce action. The judgment, among other things, equitably distributed the marital property.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is modified on the law by providing that the net proceeds from the sale of the home shall be distributed equally between the parties and as modified the judgment is affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff appeals from a judgment that, inter alia, distributed the assets of the marriage. We conclude that Supreme Court’s distribution of the assets was reasonable and not an abuse of discretion *(see McPheeters v McPheeters,*284 AD2d 968 [2001]), including the amount and duration of maintenance *(see Anderson v Anderson,*286 AD2d 967, 969 [2001]), except insofar as the court ordered that defendant receive $15,000 from the net proceeds of the sale of the home in which plaintiff was living prior to an equal distribution of those net proceeds. The court determined that the $15,000 represented defendant’s separate contribution towards the purchase of the home and defendant was therefore entitled “to recoup [that] sum ... as his separate property claim.” We conclude that the *1276subject $15,000 was transformed into marital property when defendant deposited that amount into a joint checking account and ultimately used that amount toward the purchase of the home *(see Solomon v Solomon,*307 AD2d 558 [2003], *lv dismissed*1 NY3d 546 [2003]; *Sherman v Sherman,*304 AD2d 744 [2003]). Thus, we modify the judgment by providing that the net proceeds from the sale of the home shall be distributed equally between the parties and otherwise affirm.

All concur, Hayes, J., not participating. Present — Kehoe, J.P., Gorski, Martoche, Pine and Hayes, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.54

                             AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE
        R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO HOLDINGS, INC. ANNUAL INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN



        WHEREAS, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") has in
effect the R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc. Annual Incentive Award Plan,
Effective January 1, 1987 and Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2002
(the "Plan");

        WHEREAS, in accordance with resolutions adopted by the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company on June 4, 2003, this
Amendment No. 1 has been authorized and approved; and

        WHEREAS, this Amendment No. 1 herein does not violate the prohibitions
of Section 9 of the Plan;

        NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended effective as of June 4, 2003,
as follows:

                1.      Item (n) of Exhibit A of the Plan ("Definitions") is
        hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following language:

                        "(n) Operating Companies - R. J. Reynolds Tobacco
                        Company, Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc., R. J.
                        Reynolds International Business Group, Inc. (and related
                        international businesses) and any future operating
                        companies acquired by R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings,
                        Inc. that become wholly-owned direct or indirect
                        subsidiaries of R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc."

                2.      Except as the Plan is modified by this Amendment No. 1,
        the Plan remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 1 hereby is adopted by the
Company as of June 4, 2003.

                                           R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO HOLDINGS, INC.

                                           By: /s/ McDara P. Folan, III
                                               --------------------------------
                                               McDara P. Folan, III
                                               Vice President, Deputy General
                                                  Counsel and Secretary