alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 13

- 00247

- CV

IN RE BETTY PARKER R OWLEY

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis , and

Justice Scoggins

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed August 15 , 2013

[OT06]
Alerta para Consumidores

Federal Trade Commission Q Bureau of Consumer Protection Q Office of Consumer and Business Education

F C EDERAL RADE OMMISSION T FTC OR HE ONSUMER

1-877-FTC-HELP www.ftc.gov

Escudos de Radiación: ¿Afectan las

células de los consumidores?

En esta época, parece que todo el mundo tiene un teléfono celular. No es de asombrarse que los

promotores comenzaran a anunciar que los escudos son una protección contra la radiación que los

teléfonos emiten. Pero la Comisión Federal de Comercio (FTC), la agencia nacional de protección del

consumidor, sostiene que las tesis actuales sobre los escudos son "puro palabrerío."

De acuerdo con la FTC, no existen pruebas científicas de que los así denominados escudos

reduzcan significativamente la exposición a emisiones electromagnéticas. De hecho, dice la agencia, los

productos que pueden bloquear sólo el auricular B u otra pequeña porción del teléfono B son

totalmente ineficientes porque todo el teléfono emite ondas electromagnéticas. Lo que es más, estos

escudos pueden interferir con la señal del teléfono, provocar que tenga aún menos energía para

comunicarse con la estación base y posiblemente emitir más radiación.

Se están realizando estudios sobre toda relación entre las emisiones de teléfonos celulares y los

problemas de salud.

Sin embargo, para los usuarios de teléfonos celulares que deseen limitar su exposición a las

emisiones electromagnéticas de sus telefonos, la FTC sugiere limitar el uso de su teléfono celular a

conversaciones breves; aumentar la distancia entre su antena y su cabeza utilizando un equipo de

manos libres o un teléfono de automóvil con la antena fuera del auto; o evitar el uso de teléfonos

celulares donde la señal sea pobre.

La FTC trabaja en favor del consumidor para la prevención de prácticas comerciales fraudulentas,

engañosas y desleales dentro del mercado y proporciona información de utilidad al consumidor para

identificar, detener y evitar dichas prácticas. Para presentar un reclamo o recibir información gratuita

sobre temas de interés del consumidor, llame sin cargo al 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357), o

utilice el formulario de reclamo en línea visitando www.ftc.gov. La Comisión Federal de Comercio

ingresa todos los reclamos relacionados a fraudes cometidos a través de Internet, sistema de

telemercadeo, robo de identidad y otros reclamos fraudulentos a una segura Base de Datos en línea

llamada Consumer Sentinel (Centinela del Consumidor), dicha Base de Datos se encuentra a

disposición de cientos de agencias de aplicación de la ley civil y penal en los Estados Unidos y en el

exterior del país.

febrero 2002
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2054

To amend the Bill Emerson Humanitarian Trust Act to provide clarification 

with respect to the period of time for which funds may be held in 

the trust established under that Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2003

Mr. JOHN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Agriculture 

A BILL

To amend the Bill Emerson Humanitarian Trust Act to 

provide clarification with respect to the period of time 

for which funds may be held in the trust established 

under that Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO BILL EMERSON HUMANI4 TARIAN TRUST ACT. 

5 Section 302(b)(1)(D) of the Bill Emerson Humani6 tarian Trust Act (7 U.S.C. 1736f–1(b)(1)(D)) is amended 

7 by inserting after ‘‘paragraph (2)(B)’’ the following: 
2

•HR 2054 IH 

1 ‘‘which may be held for such period of time as the Sec2 retary determines to be appropriate and’’.

Æ
Editorial Note on Part 303
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 303 appear at 68 FR 56555, Oct. 1, 2003.

§ 303.4 Determination of territorial distribution. ( a ) *Procedure for determination.* The Secretaries shall determine the territorial shares concurrently with their determination of the total annual duty exemption, and in the same manner (see § 303.3, above).
( b ) *Standards for determination* — ( 1 ) *Limitations.* A territorial share may not be reduced by more than 500,000 units in any calendar year. No territorial share shall be less than 500,000 units.
( 2 ) *Criteria for setting precise quantities.* The Secretaries shall determine the precise quantities after considering, *inter alia,* the territorial capacity to produce and ship watch units. The Secretaries shall further bear in mind the aggregate benefits to the territories, such as creditable wages paid, creditable wages per unit exported, and corporate income tax payments.
( 3 ) *Limitations on reduction of share.* The Secretaries shall not reduce a territory's share if its producers use 85% or more of the quantity distributed to that territory in the immediately preceding year, except in the case of a major increase or decrease in the number of producers in a territory or if they believe that a territorial industry will decrease production by more than 15% from the total of the preceding year.
( 4 ) *Standby redistribution authority.* The Secretaries may redistribute territorial shares if such action is warranted by circumstances unforeseen at the time of the initial distributions, such as that a territory will use less than 80% of its total by the end of a calendar year, or if a redistribution is necessary to maintain the competitive nature of the territorial industries.
[49 FR 17740, Apr. 25, 1984, as amended at 50 FR 7170, Feb. 21, 1985]
### SCWC-16-0000692 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs. SHUAN E. FLEETWOOD, also known as SHAUN FLEETWOOD,

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-16-0000692; CR. NO. 10-1-1668) ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI ( B y : R e c k t e n w a l d , C . J . , N a k a y a m a , M c K e n n a , P o l l a c k , a n d W i l s o n , J J . )



### Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant’s application for writ of certiorari, filed on January 2, 2019, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai # i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, February 12, 2019. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-16-0000692 12-FEB-2019 01:34 PM
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: John R. Guillory and Preis, PLC v. Hallmark Specialty Insurance 

Company

Appellate case number: 01-22-00081-CV

Trial court case number: 2021-33760

Trial court: 151st District Court of Harris County

James H. Gibson has filed a motion to appear pro hac vice as counsel for Appellants John 

P. Guillory and Preis PLC. The motion is supported by a motion from Texas attorney David L. 

Pybus. Both motions comply with the rules. TEX. RULES GOVERN. BAR ADM’N R. XIX; TEX. R.

APP. P. 10.1(a). Accordingly, we grant both motions and order that James H. Gibson is 

admitted pro hac vice to participate in this appeal as counsel for Appellants.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/Veronica Rivas-Molloy

Acting individually 

Date: March 3, 2022
<PAGE>

                                                                   Page 13 of 25
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(e)


                        KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 1999-B

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE


Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas          Key Bank USA, National Association
fka, Bankers Trust Company                    800 Superior Avenue, 4th Floor
280 Park Avenue 9th Floor                     Cleveland, Ohio 44114
New York, NY 10017                            ATTN: Senior Vice President
Attn: Corporate Trust & Agency Group          Key Education Resources
Structured Finance                            Phone: (216) 828-9342
Phone: (212) 454-4298                         Fax: (216) 828-9301
Fax: (212) 454-2331


Pursuant to Section 3.09 of the Indenture between KeyCorp Student Loan Trust
1999-B, as Issuer, and Bankers Trust Company, as Indenture Trustee, dated
September 1, 1999, the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) a review of the
activities of the Issuer from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2002, and of
its performance under the Indenture has been made, and (ii) to the best of my
knowledge, based on such review, the Issuer has fulfilled all its obligations
under the Indenture throughout such period.


                                          KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 1999-B,
                                          as Issuer
                                          By: Bank One, National Association
                                          as Eligible Lender Trustee


                                          By: /s/ JEFFREY L. KINNEY
                                              ----------------------------------
Date: March 14, 2003                          Name: Jeffrey L. Kinney
                                              Title: Vice President
# L_2020210EN.01003901.xml

| 2.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 210/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 210/39

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 70/2019

of 29 March 2019

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2020/823]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/987 of 27 April 2018 amending and correcting Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/655 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1628 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to monitoring of gaseous pollutant emissions from in-service internal combustion engines installed in non-road mobile machinery (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/987 of 27 April 2018 amending and correcting Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/655 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1628 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to monitoring of gaseous pollutant emissions from in-service internal combustion engines installed in non-road mobile machinery (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 1g (Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/655) of Chapter XXIV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| | ‘, as amended by:






  — | 32018 R 0987: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/987 of 27 April 2018 (OJ L 182, 18.7.2018, p. 40).’ |
| --- | --- | --- |

‘, as amended by:

—

32018 R 0987: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/987 of 27 April 2018 (OJ L 182, 18.7.2018, p. 40).’

Article 2

The text of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/987 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 30 March 2019, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 29 March 2019.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 182, 18.7.2018, p. 40.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
On Friday, January 22, 2013 at 1:30 PM EST, Secretary Ray LaHood had a conversation via telephone with the Governor of Puerto Rico, Alejandro García

Padilla, regarding the privatization of the Luis Muñoz Marín International Airport (SJU).

Governor García

- Padilla informed the Secretary that he was not requesting a decision on the application by a specific date, but wanted to express the following concerns with respect to SJU’s application to participate in the FAA’s Airport
Privatization Pil ot Program:

• The firing of any employees of SJU as a result of privatization; and

• Any increase in airport rates or fees at SJU.

Secretary LaHood noted that the FAA is currently reviewing the SJU application and was aware of the concerns expressed by the Governor, which were previously expressed on December 28, 2012. The Secretary stated that the FAA would render a decision on the application shortly.
**GAO-02-1118R**                      Published: Sep 20, 2002. Publicly Released: Sep 20, 2002.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Status of FY22 Projects 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

GAO reviewed the audit report covering the financial statements of the Retired Enlisted Association, Incorporated, for fiscal years 2001, 2000, and 1999. GAO did not review the auditors' working papers and did not render an audit opinion. The audit reports included the auditors' opinions that the financial statements of the corporation do not present fairly, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the financial position of the corporation or the changes in its net assets or cash flows for 2001, 2000, and 1999.

## Full Report

Full Report (2 pages)

Accessible Text 

## Office of Public Affairs

### Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

### Public Inquiries

Public Affairs
PublicAffairs@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

Auditing and Financial Management

Accounting standardsAudit reportsFederal corporationsFinancial statement auditsReporting requirementsFinancial statementsAuditorsFederally chartered corporationFinancial managementElderly persons
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

872 

KA 09-00579 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HENDELL PHILLIPS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

THOMAS J. EOANNOU, BUFFALO (JEREMY D. SCHWARTZ OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (NICHOLAS T. TEXIDO

OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Penny

M. Wolfgang, J.), rendered March 9, 2009. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon a jury verdict, of criminal possession of a weapon in

the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third

degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him

upon a jury verdict of criminal possession of a weapon in the second

degree (Penal Law § 265.03 [3]) and criminal possession of a weapon in

the third degree (§ 265.02 [1]). Defendant failed to preserve for our

review his contention that Supreme Court erred in instructing the jury

on accessorial liability with respect to criminal possession of a

weapon in the second degree (see CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to

exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion

in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). Defendant also

failed to preserve for our review his contention that the evidence is

legally insufficient to support the conviction of criminal possession

of a weapon in the second degree inasmuch as his motion for a trial

order of dismissal was not “ ‘specifically directed’ at the alleged

error[s]” now asserted on appeal (People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19). In

any event, that contention is without merit. Defendant contends that

the evidence is legally insufficient to establish that he possessed a

loaded firearm outside of his home or place of business (see Penal Law

§ 265.03 [3]), and that such possession was knowing and unlawful. 

Defendant, however, admitted to the police that he sold the gun at

issue to his accomplice and hid the gun on the night of the shooting

upon the accomplice’s request, and the People presented evidence

establishing that defendant’s DNA was found on both the gun and the

bandana wrapped around the gun. The People also presented evidence
-2- 872 

KA 09-00579 

establishing that defendant told the police that the house where the

gun was located was his accomplice’s house; he never told the police

that it was his home and, indeed, there is no evidence to support that

inference. Further, viewing the evidence in light of the elements of

criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree as charged to the

jury (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 349), we reject defendant’s

further contention that the verdict is against the weight of the

evidence with respect to that crime (see generally People v

Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). Finally, the sentence is not unduly

harsh or severe.

Entered: September 27, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
----

----

**Exhibit        32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

| 1. | The                  Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section                  13(a) or                  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                  information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,                  in all                  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                  of                  the Company at the end of the periods covered by the Quarterly                  Report. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|-------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:                  May 21, 2007 |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|                                | By:    |  /s/                  *James                  Price                                  * |
|                                |   | James                  Price                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|                                |   | Chief                  Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |

----
|  |  | Metadata Publications- Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata Version 2 - June 1998  Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata April 1997.   Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata Workbook, March 1995.   
- Description of changes made to the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata June 1994 version.    Draft Encoding Standard for FGDC Metadata revised June 24, 1997.   Fact Sheet on Geospatial Metadata.
- Final Draft Version 2.0 of the GEO Profile : Z39.50 Application Profile for the Content Specification for Digital Geospatial Metadata    Perspectives in the Development of ISO Metadata Standards, by Dave Danko, WWW Workshop, February 1997.   The Value of Metadata, Manager's Brochure. |
|--|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|