alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1500.44 Disqualification. ( a ) In the event that any Board member or alternate Board member who was appointed as a manufacturer ceases to qualify as a manufacturer, such Board member or alternate Board member shall be disqualified from serving on the Board. The replacement may be at the Secretary's initiative or the Board may recommend to the Secretary that the member be removed.
( b ) If a member of the Board consistently refuses to perform the duties of a member of the Board, or if a member of the Board engages in acts of dishonesty or willful misconduct, the Board may recommend to the Secretary that the member be removed from office.
( c ) All members serve at the pleasure of the Secretary.
§ 766.6 Answer and demand for hearing. ( a ) *When to answer.* The respondent must answer the charging letter within 30 days after being served with notice of the issuance of a charging letter instituting an administrative enforcement proceeding, or within 30 days of notice of any supplement or amendment to a charging letter, unless time is extended under § 766.16 of this part.
( b ) *Contents of answer.* The answer must be responsive to the charging letter and must fully set forth the nature of the respondent's defense or defenses. The answer must admit or deny specifically each separate allegation of the charging letter; if the respondent is without knowledge, the answer must so state and will operate as a denial. Failure to deny or controvert a particular allegation will be deemed an admission of that allegation. The answer must also set forth any additional or new matter the respondent believes supports a defense or claim of mitigation. Any defense or partial defense not specifically set forth in the answer shall be deemed waived, and evidence thereon may be refused, except for good cause shown.
( c ) *Demand for hearing.* If the respondent desires a hearing, a written demand for one must be submitted with the answer. Any demand by BIS for a hearing must be filed with the administrative law judge within 30 days after service of the answer. Failure to make a timely written demand for a hearing shall be deemed a waiver of the party's right to a hearing, except for good cause shown. If no party demands a hearing, the matter will go forward in accordance with the procedures set forth in § 766.15 of this part.
( d ) *English language required.* The answer, all other papers, and all documentary evidence must be submitted in English, or translations into English must be filed and served at the same time.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-53,890] 

Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on December 29, 2004, in response to a petition filed by the United Steelworkers of America on behalf of workers at Arrow Terminals, Allquippa, Pennsylvania. 

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th day of January, 2004. 

Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 04-2613 Filed 2-5-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
No: II-13-047 July 2, 2013

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416

NRC Authorizes Honeywell Metropolis Facility to Resume Operations 

After a thorough evaluation and inspection of plant modifications at the Honeywell uranium conversion 

plant in Metropolis, Ill., the Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has determined that the company may resume 

all NRC-licensed activities. 

“We have inspected the changes made by the company and found that the facility has taken the necessary

actions to meet NRC requirements,” said NRC Region II Administrator Victor McCree. “Honeywell has 

appropriately enhanced the plant’s ability to withstand earthquakes and tornadoes.”

In October 2012, the NRC issued a confirmatory order to Honeywell describing the steps the company 

would have to take before it could resume its uranium conversion operations. That order came after inspections 

earlier in 2012 identified concerns related to the likelihood of a release of uranium hexafluoride following an 

earthquake or tornado.

The plant has been shut down since May 2012 and the company has been enhancing and modifying 

equipment to meet the requirements of that order. In June, the NRC allowed the plant to begin limited operations, 

but today’s decision authorizes operation of all of the plant processes covered by its NRC license.

The Honeywell plant takes milled uranium and converts it into uranium hexafluoride. That compound is 

then processed at other facilities to make fuel for commercial power reactors.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 245 (Friday, December 21, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 65782]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27631]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 10637]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Imported 
for Exhibition--Determinations: ``Tintoretto: Artist of Renaissance 
Venice'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects to be included in the exhibition 
``Tintoretto: Artist of Renaissance Venice,'' imported from abroad for 
temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with 
the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition 
or display of the exhibit objects at the National Gallery of Art, 
Washington, District of Columbia, from on or about March 10, 2019, 
until on or about July 7, 2019, and at possible additional exhibitions 
or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elliot Chiu, Attorney-Adviser, Office 
of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-
6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ff8c9a9c8b969091cdcbcac6bf8c8b9e8b9ad1989089"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9ae9fff9eef3f5f4a8aeafa3dae9eefbeeffb4fdf5ec">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the 
Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, 
et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 
of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 
2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-21 of December 14, 2018.

Jennifer Z. Galt,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural 
Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2018-27631 Filed 12-20-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### §8157. Joint title to medical equipment

(a) Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary may enter into agreements with institutions described in section 8153(a) of this title for the joint acquisition of medical equipment.

(b)(1) The Secretary may not pay more than one-half of the purchase price of equipment acquired through an agreement under subsection (a).

(2) Any equipment to be procured under such an agreement shall be procured by the Secretary. Title to such equipment shall be held jointly by the United States and the institution.

(3) Before equipment acquired under such an agreement may be used, the parties to the agreement shall arrange by contract under section 8153 of this title for the exchange or use of the equipment.

(4) The Secretary may not contract for the acquisition of medical equipment to be purchased jointly under an agreement under subsection (a) until the institution which enters into the agreement provides to the Secretary its share of the purchase price of the medical equipment.

(c)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary may transfer the interest of the Department in equipment acquired through an agreement under subsection (a) to the institution which holds joint title to the equipment if the Secretary determines that the transfer would be justified by compelling clinical considerations or the economic interest of the Department. Any such transfer may only be made upon agreement by the institution to pay to the Department the amount equal to one-half of the depreciated purchase price of the equipment. Any such payment when received shall be credited to the applicable Department medical appropriation.

(2) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary may acquire the interest of an institution in equipment acquired under subsection (a) if the Secretary determines that the acquisition would be justified by compelling clinical considerations or the economic interests of the Department. The Secretary may not pay more than one-half the depreciated purchase price of that equipment.

(Added Pub. L. 102–405, title I, §103(a)(1), Oct. 9, 1992, 106 Stat. 1973.)
#### § 1105.7 Limits on compensation.

The Commission may establish a limit on the total amount of financial compensation to be made to all participants in a particular proceeding and may establish a limit on the total amount of compensation to be made to any one participant in a particular proceeding.
#### Alex Darlow, Respondent, v. City of New York et al., Defendants, and Drake Bakeries, Inc., Appellant.

No opinion. Carswell, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
```

[House Report 108-209]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

108th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                    108-209

======================================================================

 
 PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 2691, DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR AND 
               RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2004

                                _______
                                

   July 15, 2003.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

Mr. Hastings of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the 
                               following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 319]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 319, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 2691, the 
Department of the Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations 
Act for fiscal year 2004, under an open rule. The rule provides 
one hour of general debate equally divided and controlled by 
the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Appropriations. The rule waives all points of order against 
consideration of the bill.
    Under the rules of the House the bill shall be read for 
amendment by paragraph. The rule waives points of order against 
provisions in the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 of 
rule XXI (prohibiting unauthorized appropriations or 
legislative provisions in an appropriations bill), except as 
specified in the resolution. The rule further waives points of 
order against amendments for failure to comply with clause 2(e) 
of rule XXI (prohibiting designated emergencies in reported 
appropriation bills). The rule authorizes the Chair to accord 
priority in recognition to Members who have pre-printed their 
amendments in the Congressional Record.
    Finally, the rule provides one motion to recommit with or 
without instructions.
    The waiver of clause 2 of rule XXI (prohibiting 
unauthorized appropriations or legislative provisions in an 
appropriations bill) is needed because there are numerous 
legislative provisions included in the bill.

                                

```
No. II-12-034 May 14, 2012

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416

NRC TO INCREASE OVERSIGHT OF ST. LUCIE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is increasing its oversight of Unit 1 at the St. Lucie 

nuclear power plant as a result of the number and type of unplanned shutdowns the plant has 

experienced. The St. Lucie plant is located in Jensen Beach, Fla., east of Port St. Lucie, and is 

operated by FPL. 

After its quarterly review of plant performance in April, the NRC updated its assessment of St. 

Lucie Unit 1. That evaluation consisted of a review of performance indicators and inspection results. 

The NRC review found that St. Lucie Unit 1 crossed the green-to-white threshold for 

Unplanned Scrams per 7,000 Critical Hours performance indicator. This was due to one trip in the 

third quarter of 2011, one trip in the fourth quarter of 2011, and one trip in the first quarter of 2012. 

In addition, the review identified that the Unplanned Scrams with Complications performance 

indicator also crossed the green-to-white threshold. This was due to one complicated trip in the third 

quarter of 2011 and one complicated trip in the first quarter of 2012.

“Overall, the St. Lucie plant continues to operate safely,” said NRC Region II Administrator 

Victor McCree. “However, these shutdowns point to performance issues and a trend that needs to be 

addressed.”

The NRC has placed St. Lucie Unit 1 in the Degraded Cornerstone Column of the Reactor 

Oversight Process Action Matrix beginning in the first quarter this year. The NRC will conduct a 

supplemental inspection to provide assurance that the causes of the shutdowns are understood, that 

the extent of condition is identified, and ensure FPL’s corrective actions are

sufficient.”

The NRC evaluates inspection findings and performance indicators at commercial nuclear 

power plants with a color-coded system which classifies them as green, white, yellow or red, in 

increasing order of safety significance. As the significance increases, the NRC heightens the level 

of oversight for that plant. If a plant takes appropriate corrective actions and improves safety 

performance, the agency returns to its normal, but still extensive, inspection schedule.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES link 

on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to 

NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave. NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
# Jurnalul Oficial C 366A/30 o

| | ISSN 1977-1029 |
| --- | --- |
| Jurnalul Oficial
  al Uniunii Europene | C 366A |
| | |
| Ediţia în limba română | Comunicări şi informări | Anul 6330 octombrie 2020 |

ISSN 1977-1029

Jurnalul Oficial

al Uniunii Europene

C 366A

Ediţia în limba română

Comunicări şi informări

Anul 6330 octombrie 2020

---

| Cuprins | Pagina |
| --- | --- |
| | Rectificări |
| 2020/C 366 A/01 | Rectificare la Anunț de post vacant CONS/AD/162/20 ( JO C 358 A, 26.10.2020 ) | 1 |

Cuprins

Pagina

Rectificări

2020/C 366 A/01

Rectificare la Anunț de post vacant CONS/AD/162/20 ( JO C 358 A, 26.10.2020 )

( JO C 358 A, 26.10.2020 )

1

---

| RO | |
| --- | --- |

RO

---

Rectificări

| 30.10.2020 | RO | Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene | CA 366/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2020

RO

Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene

CA 366/1

---

Rectificare la Anunț de post vacant CONS/AD/162/20

(
  Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene C 358 A din 26 octombrie 2020
  )

(2020/C 366 A/01)

La pagina 1, în secțiunea „INFORMAȚII GENERALE”, „Departament”:

| în loc de: | „DG RELEX: Afaceri externe, extindere și protecție civilă”, |
| --- | --- |

în loc de:

„DG RELEX: Afaceri externe, extindere și protecție civilă”,

| se citește: | „DG RELEX: Relații externe”. |
| --- | --- |

se citește:

se citește:

„DG RELEX: Relații externe”.

La pagina 1, în secțiunea „Cine suntem”, al doilea paragraf:

| în loc de: | „Direcția generală afaceri externe, extindere și protecție civilă (DG RELEX) cuprinde în prezent 2 direcții: RELEX.1, care se ocupă de comerț, dezvoltare, securitate și coordonare, și RELEX.2, care se ocupă de extindere, Orientul Mijlociu și Africa de Nord, protecție civilă.”, |
| --- | --- |

în loc de:

în loc de:

„Direcția generală afaceri externe, extindere și protecție civilă (DG RELEX) cuprinde în prezent 2 direcții: RELEX.1, care se ocupă de comerț, dezvoltare, securitate și coordonare, și RELEX.2, care se ocupă de extindere, Orientul Mijlociu și Africa de Nord, protecție civilă.”,

| se citește: | „Direcția generală relații externe” (DG RELEX) cuprinde în prezent două direcții: RELEX.1, care se ocupă de comerț, dezvoltare și securitate, și RELEX.2, care se ocupă de politica de vecinătate și răspunsul la criză.”. |
| --- | --- |

se citește:

se citește:

„Direcția generală relații externe” (DG RELEX) cuprinde în prezent două direcții: RELEX.1, care se ocupă de comerț, dezvoltare și securitate, și RELEX.2, care se ocupă de politica de vecinătate și răspunsul la criză.”.

---
(June 17, 1953.)

(Republish.)

#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Brighton Mills, Inc., Appellant, and Rayon Corporation of America, Respondent.

We find on the facts here that the parties stipulated to proceed in this arbitration with associate counsel present for a short time and with regular counsel present the next day. There has been no showing of prejudice. We find nothing else in the conduct of the arbitrators which could be considered misconduct. All of the complaints of *671substance relate to alleged errors of fact or law made by the arbitrators, which we may not review. Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion to confirm the award granted. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Callahan and Bergan, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 669.]
Exhibit 32.2


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bayview Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended February 29, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Date: April 14, 2004


/s/ Paul Ng
------------------------------------
Paul Ng
Principal Financial Officer
§ 2004.35 Processing demands and requests. ( a ) The General Counsel will review a request or demand to produce or disclose records, information or testimony and determine whether, or under what conditions, to authorize the employee to testify regarding USTR matters or produce records and information. The General Counsel will notify the requester of the final determination, the reasons for the grant or denial of the demand or request, and any conditions on disclosure.
( b ) When necessary, the General Counsel will coordinate with the U.S. Department of Justice to file appropriate motions, including motions to remove the matter to Federal court, to quash, or to obtain a protective order.
( c ) The General Counsel will process demands and requests in the order in which they are received. Absent unusual circumstances and depending on the scope of the demand or request, the General Counsel will respond within 45 calendar days of the date USTR receives all information necessary to evaluate the demand or request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL
                          EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bekem Metals, Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Marat
Cherdabayev, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



Date: May 23, 2005                                     /s/ Marat Cherdabayev
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Marat Cherdabayev,
                                                     Principal Executive Officer