alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, James N. Ryan, the Chief Executive Officer of Petroleum Development Corporation, the managing general partner of PDC 2002-A Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"),  hereby certify that: 

- I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Partnership (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;
- the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

/s/ James N. Ryan                  

Name: James N. Ryan

Title: Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 12, 2003
Exhibit 10.31


                                 PROMISSORY NOTE


$200,000.00                                                San Mateo, California
                                                                  April 20, 2000


     For value  received,  the  undersigned  (the  "Borrower")  promises  to pay
AvantGo,  Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),  at its principal office
the principal sum of Two Hundred Thousand Dollars  ($200,000.00),  with interest
from  the date  hereof  at a rate of six  percent  (6%)  per  annum,  compounded
semiannually,  on the unpaid  balance of such  principal sum. Such principal and
interest  shall be due and  payable  on April 19,  2005 (the  "Maturity  Date"),
provided  that if the  Maturity  Date  occurs  during (i) the  "lock-up"  period
following an Initial Public  Offering of the Company's  securities,  or (ii) the
period of time  following a "Change of Control"  (as defined in the Stock Option
Agreement  (the  "Option  Agreement")  dated as of October 19, 1999  between the
undersigned and the Company) in which  Borrower's  ability to sell shares of the
Company's capital stock is prohibited, the Maturity Date shall be extended until
the date on which such lock-up period or prohibition expires.

     Notwithstanding  the foregoing,  the entire unpaid principal sum and unpaid
interest under this Note shall become  immediately  due and payable upon: (a) 90
days after the Borrower ceases to be employed by the Company; (b) the failure of
the Borrower to pay when due the principal  balance and accrued interest on this
Note and the continuation of such default for more than thirty (30) days; or (c)
the  insolvency of the Borrower,  the  commission of an act of bankruptcy by the
Borrower,  the execution by the Borrower of a general assignment for the benefit
of  creditors,  or the  filing by or  against  the  Borrower  of a  petition  in
bankruptcy  or a  petition  for  relief  under  the  provisions  of the  federal
bankruptcy act or another state or federal law for the relief of debtors and the
continuation of such petition without dismissal for a period of ninety (90) days
or more.

     Principal  and interest are payable in lawful money of the United States of
America. AMOUNTS DUE UNDER THIS NOTE MAY BE PREPAID AT ANY TIME WITHOUT PENALTY.

     Should suit be commenced to collect any sums due under this Note,  such sum
as the Court may deem reasonable  shall be added hereto as attorneys'  fees. The
makers and endorsers have severally  waived  presentment  for payment,  protest,
notice of protest, and notice of nonpayment of this Note.


                                        /s/ Mike Aufricht
                                        -----------------------------
                                        Mike Aufricht
Exhibit 32.1    Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Western Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc. (the "Company") for the six months ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Michael J. OHanlon, as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, Steven P. Grimes, as Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company and James W. Kleifges as Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Michael J. OHanlonBy:Michael J. OHanlonChief Executive Officer and PresidentDate:August 12, 2009/s/ Steven P. GrimesBy:Steven P. GrimesChief Operating Officer and Chief Financial OfficerDate:August 12, 2009/s/ James W. KleifgesBy:James W. KleifgesChief Accounting OfficerDate:August 12, 2009
# Službeni list C 391/2020

| | ISSN 1977-1088 |
| --- | --- |
| Službeni list
  Europske unije | C 391 |
| | |
| Hrvatsko izdanje | Informacije i objave | Godište 63.16. studenoga 2020. |

ISSN 1977-1088

Službeni list

Europske unije

C 391

Hrvatsko izdanje

Informacije i objave

Godište 63.16. studenoga 2020.

---

| Sadržaj | Stranica |
| --- | --- |
| | IV.   Obavijesti |
| | OBAVIJESTI INSTITUCIJA, TIJELA, UREDA I AGENCIJA EUROPSKE UNIJE |
| | Vijeće Europske unije |
| 2020/C 391/01 | Odluka Vijeća od 10. studenoga 2020. o imenovanju predsjednika žalbenih vijeća Ureda Europske unije za intelektualno vlasništvo | 1 |

Sadržaj

Stranica

IV.   Obavijesti

OBAVIJESTI INSTITUCIJA, TIJELA, UREDA I AGENCIJA EUROPSKE UNIJE

Vijeće Europske unije

2020/C 391/01

Odluka Vijeća od 10. studenoga 2020. o imenovanju predsjednika žalbenih vijeća Ureda Europske unije za intelektualno vlasništvo

1

---

| HR | |
| --- | --- |

HR

---

IV. Obavijesti

OBAVIJESTI INSTITUCIJA, TIJELA, UREDA I AGENCIJA EUROPSKE UNIJE

Vijeće Europske unije

| 16.11.2020 | HR | Službeni list Europske unije | C 391/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2020

HR

Službeni list Europske unije

C 391/1

---

ODLUKA VIJEĆA

od 10. studenoga 2020.

o imenovanju predsjednika žalbenih vijeća Ureda Europske unije za intelektualno vlasništvo

(2020/C 391/01)

VIJEĆE EUROPSKE UNIJE,

uzimajući u obzir Ugovor o funkcioniranju Europske unije,

uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (EU) 2017/1001 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 14. lipnja 2017. o žigu Europske unije (1), a posebno njezin članak 166. stavak 1.,

budući da:

Vijeće je 8. lipnja 2020. od Upravljačkog odbora Ureda Europske unije za intelektualno vlasništvo (EUIPO) primilo popis kandidata predloženih za mjesto predsjednika žalbenih vijeća EUIPO-a,

DONIJELO JE OVU ODLUKU:

Članak 1.

1.   G. João Nuno MAROCO AMARAL NEGRÃO, rođen u Lisabonu (Portugal) 2. studenoga 1970., imenuje se predsjednikom žalbenih vijeća Ureda Europske unije za intelektualno vlasništvo (EUIPO) na mandat od pet godina.

2.   Datum početka petogodišnjeg mandata iz stavka 1. određuje Upravljački odbor EUIPO-a.

Članak 2.

Ova Odluka stupa na snagu na dan objave u Službenom listu Europske unije.

Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 10. studenoga 2020.

Za Vijeće

Predsjednik

M. ROTH

---

(1)  SL L 154, 16.6.2017., str. 1.

1

---
June 25, 2015 

Mr. Mitch Highman 

MJOY Photography 

3544 8th Street E 

West Fargo, ND 58078 

Dear Mr.Highman: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your June 11, exemption request on behalf of MJOY Photography into the public 

docket (No. FAA-2015-2229), but we are unable to process your request any further. The 

information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For 

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS3517 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
#### § 730.3 “Dual use” and other types of items subject to the EAR.

The term “dual use” is often used to describe the types of items subject to the EAR. A “dual-use” item is one that has civil applications as well as terrorism and military or weapons of mass destruction (WMD)-related applications. The precise description of what is “subject to the EAR” is in § 734.3, which does not limit the EAR to controlling only dual-use items. In essence, the EAR control any item warranting control that is not exclusively controlled for export, reexport, or transfer (in-country) by another agency of the U.S. Government or otherwise excluded from being subject to the EAR pursuant to § 734.3(b) of the EAR. Thus, items subject to the EAR include purely civilian items, items with both civil and military, terrorism or potential WMD-related applications, and items that are exclusively used for military applications but that do not warrant control under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) (22 CFR parts 120 *et seq.*).

[78 FR 22705, Apr. 16, 2013]
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No. FAA - 2011 - 0548 Directorate ID: 2011 - SW - 025 - AD Helicopter Model: Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation (Sikorsky) Model S - 92A Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 29 Helico pters in the US Registry. Reason : This AD is prompted by a report of a crack found on the MGB upper housing assembly left mounting foot forward rib that cannot be detected visually. This AD requires a nondestructive inspection (NDI), eddy current or fluor escent penetrant inspection (FPI), of each main gearbox (MGB) upper housing assembly rib on the left, right, and forward MGB mounting foot. If there is a crack, this AD requires replacement. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $286,000 for a MGB upper housing. Labor per Helicopter 29 helicopters x 3.5 work- hours per inspection x 16 inspections per year x $85 per work - hour = $138,040. 56 work- hours x $85 per work - hour = $4,760, to replace 1 MGB. Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $4,760 to do 16 ND I inspections per year. Total US Fleet Cost $428,800, assuming 1 replacement of the MGB upper housing assembly. Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer: Michael Schwetz
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No s
. 42535/42536

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

DUSTIN MARKUS MEUSER ,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2015 Unpublished Opinion No. 543

Filed: July 9, 2015

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Michael E. Wetherell , District Judge.

Judgments of conviction and concurrent sentences of forty years with fifteen years determinate for robbery and fourteen years with seven years determinate for grand theft, affirmed

.

Sara B. Thom as, State Appellate Public Defender; Shawn F. Wilkerson , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming

, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge; and GRATTON, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM
In a global plea agreement, Dustin Markus Meuser pled guilty to one count of robbery

, Idaho Code § 18

- 6501 (Docket No. 42535), and one count of grand theft, I.C. §§ 18

- 2403(1), 18

- 2407(1)(b), 18

- 2409 (Docket No. 42536) . The district court sentenced Meuser to a unified

sentence of forty years with fifteen years determinate on the robbery charge and a concurrent

unified sentence of fourteen years with seve n years determinate on the grand theft charge

.
Meuser appeals asserting that the district court abused its discretion by imposing excessive

sentences

.2 Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factor s to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.

1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Ap plying these standards, and having reviewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Meuser ’s judgment s of conviction and sentence s are affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Presidio Trust

# AGENCY:

The Presidio Trust. 

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with “§ 103(c)(6) of the Presidio Trust Act, 16 U.S.C. 460bb note, Title I of Pub. L. 104-333, 110 Stat. 4097, as amended, and in accordance with the Presidio Trust's bylaws, notice is hereby given that a public meeting of the Presidio Trust Board of Directors will be held commencing 6 p.m. on Thursday, December 9, 2004, at the Officers' Club, 50 Moraga Avenue, Presidio of San Francisco, California. The Presidio Trust was created by Congress in 1996 to manage approximately eighty percent of the former U.S. Army base known as the Presidio, in San Francisco, California. 

The purposes of this meeting are to provide an end of the year project and budget update and to receive public comment in accordance with the Trust's Public Outreach Policy. 

*Accommodation:*                         Individuals requiring special accommodation at this meeting, such as needing a sign language interpreter, should contact Mollie Matull at (415) 561-5300 prior to December 3, 2004.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Karen Cook, General Counsel, the Presidio Trust, 34 Graham Street, P.O. Box 29052, San Francisco, California 94129-0052, telephone: (415) 561-5300. 

Dated: November 16, 2004. 

Karen A. Cook, 

General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 04-25779 Filed 11-19-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-4R-P
(June 21, 1949.)

#### Michael Nolan, Appellant, *v.*Eros Foods, Inc., Respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

A causal connection was shown between the fall of the plaintiff and the asserted negligence of defendant in permitting garbage to accumulate on the steps of the cellar stairway. Moreover, in the circumstances shown here, it cannot be said that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. On the evidence reasonable minds might well differ as to whether plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence *(Nelson*v. *Nygren,*259 N. Y. 71, 76; *Romano*v. *Home Owners’ Loan Corp.,*263 App. Div. 743). Accordingly, those issues of fact were properly left to the jury for resolution. The determination of the Appellate Term should be reversed and the judgment of the City Court in favor of plaintiff should be reinstated, with costs of this appeal and in the Appellate Term to appellant.

Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ., concur.

Determination unanimously reversed and the verdict of the City Court of the City of New York, Bronx County, reinstated, with costs of this appeal and costs in the Appellate Term to the appellant. [See *post,*p. 1025.]
INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND PRESS RELEASE ON GEORGIA

----

GEORGIA
### §171. Disposal as agricultural lands

Except as otherwise provided in chapter 3A of this title, all public lands within the State of Alabama, whether mineral or otherwise, shall be subject to disposal only as agricultural lands. All lands which had been reported to the General Land Office prior to March 3, 1883, as containing coal and iron shall first be offered at public sale.

(Mar. 3, 1883, ch. 118, 22 Stat. 487; Feb. 25, 1920, ch. 85, §1, 41 Stat. 437.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is from act Mar. 3, 1883, which contained an additional provision relating to pending homesteads, which was omitted because of its temporary nature.

#### Amendments

1920—The exception clause was inserted at beginning of this section because of act Feb. 25, 1920, which provided that deposits of coal, phosphate, sodium, oil, oil shale, or gas, and lands containing such deposits owned by the United States, shall be subject to disposition in the form and manner provided by such act.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

General Land Office abolished and functions transferred to Bureau of Land Management by Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1946, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100, and regulations thereunder. See note set out under section 1 of Title 43, Public Lands.
### §624. Information on certain leasing authorities

(a) In General.—Except as provided in subsection (b), not later than December 31 of each year following the date of enactment of this subchapter, a Federal agency with independent leasing authority shall submit to the Council a list of all leases, including operating leases, in effect on the date of enactment of this subchapter that includes—

(1) the date on which each lease was executed;

(2) the date on which each lease will expire;

(3) a description of the size of the space;

(4) the location of the property;

(5) the tenant agency;

(6) the total annual rental payment; and

(7) the amount of the net present value of the total estimated legal obligations of the Federal Government over the life of the contract.

(b) Exception.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to—

(1) the United States Postal Service; or

(2) any other property the Director excludes from subsection (a) for reasons of national security.

(Added Pub. L. 114–318, §3(a), Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1612.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of enactment of this subchapter, referred to in subsec. (a), is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 114–318, which was approved Dec. 16, 2016.
409 P.2d 266

#### Grover Lawrence SEVERS, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS of the State of New Mexico, Respondent.

No. 7908.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Jan. 3, 1966.

*632Traub, Parham & Zuris, Albuquerque, for petitioner.

Marrón & Houk, Albuquerque, for respondent.

CARMODY, Chief Justice.

Petitioner seeks a review of the decision of the Board of Bar Examiners, denying his application for admission to the New Mexico State Bar upon motion.

Except for the difference of name, the excerpt of the minutes of the Board of Bar Examiners is identical with that set out in the opinion in Rask v. Board of Bar Examiners, 75 N.M. 617, 409 P.2d 256.

Petitioner was admitted to practice of law in Ohio in 1940 following his graduation from Western Reserve University with a Bachelor of Law degree and his passing the Ohio bar examination. Other than approximately five years in the military service during World War IT, petitioner, since 1940, has generally held himself out as an attorney in the State of Ohio, and has actively and continuously practiced law as his sole occupation immediately preceding the filing of his application to be admitted on motion in 'New Mexico in September 1964.

It appears that the applicant is in all respects qualified to become a member of the' New Mexico Bar and is of good moral character.

For the reasons stated in Rask, the decision of the Board of Bar Examiners is reversed, and petitioner’s motion for admission will be granted upon proper showing of compliance with the residence requirement. It is so ordered.

CHAVEZ, NOBLE, MOISE and COMPTON, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 as
filed with the SEC on the date hereof, I, Eva Chen, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 27, 2015



By:

/s/ Eva ChenName:

Eva ChenTitle:

Chief Financial Officer




|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------