alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I, Rory O'Byrne, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Secure Automated Filing Enterprises, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly Report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report;
4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
5. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Quarterly Report is being prepared;
6. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 45 days of the filing date of this Quarterly Report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
7. presented in this Quarterly Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
8. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
9. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
10. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
11. I have indicated in this Quarterly Report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

|Date: October 20, 2004 |  | /s/ Rory O'Byrne                                               
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  |                                                                
|Name:                  |  | Rory O'Byrne                                                   
|Title:                 |  | President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer

---
Exhibit 23


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:


|    |                                                                                                            
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-224699) and in the related Prospectuses of The Clorox Company, and




|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | Registration Statements  (Form S-8 Nos. 33-56563, 33-56565, 33-41131, including post effective amendments No. 1 and No. 2, 333-16969, 333-29375, 333-44675, 333-69455, including post effective amendment No. 1, 333-86783, 333-90386, including the post effective amendment No. 1, 333-131487, 333-193913 and 333-213161) of The Clorox Company;

of our reports dated August 14, 2018 , with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of The Clorox Company and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of The Clorox Company included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of The Clorox Company for the year ended June 30, 2018 .


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


San Francisco, CA


August 14, 2018
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles May, Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 200]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. McLaughlin, J.), rendered June 9, 2005, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the third degree and possession of burglar’s tools, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490 [1987]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility. There was ample evidence supporting the conclusion that defendant entered a building with intent to commit a crime.

Defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims are unreviewable on direct appeal because they involve matters outside the record *(see People v Rivera,*71 NY2d 705, 709 [1988]; *People v Love,*57 NY2d 998 [1982]). On the existing record, to *767the extent it permits review, we find that defendant received effective assistance under the state and federal standards *(see People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 713-714 [1998]; *see also Strickland v Washington,*466 US 668 [1984]).

CPL 210.30 (6) forecloses appellate review of defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the grand jury evidence, and defendant’s other arguments concerning the grand jury proceedings are without merit.

We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining claims. Concur — Buckley, P.J., Saxe, Williams, Sweeny and Malone, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
  /s/ Carl J. Grivner

Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Gregory W. Freiberg

Gregory W. FreibergSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
________________________________________________________________________ 

TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 20-603 

SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL COOPERATION 

Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF 

AMERICA and 

the PHILIPPINES 

Signed at Manila July 16, 2019 

Entered into force June 3, 2020 
 

 

NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)— 

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.”
NRC SCHEDULES MEETING ON NFS OVERSIGHT AND RELATED ISSUES

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a public meeting for Thursday, 

Sept. 8 in Erwin, Tenn., to discuss its oversight of the Nuclear Fuel Services facility there as well 

as related issues of interest to local residents.

The meeting is scheduled to begin at 6 p.m. at the Unicoi County High School, 700 South 

Mohawk Drive in Erwin. There will be opening remarks and introductions, followed by three 

separate presentations on frequently asked about topics. There will be a short break after each 

presentation when the presenters and NRC staff will be available to answer questions.

The first presentation will focus on a National Academy of Sciences study commissioned 

by the NRC to update a national cancer study in areas near nuclear facilities. The area around 

NFS will be among those studied, and NAS officials will be on hand to discuss the study. A 1990

study, conducted by the National Institute of Health’s National Cancer Institute, found no 

increased risk of death from cancer for people living near nuclear facilities.

The second presentation will cover NRC rules and regulations regarding radiation 

exposure and public dose limits. A senior level NRC technical advisor will discuss the scientific 

basis for the limits and address concerns of residents living near NFS.

During the final presentation, an official from the NRC’s Office of Enforcement will 

discuss the agency’s enforcement process and how it relates to the inspection of the NFS facility.

 These presentations fulfill a commitment made by the NRC staff at an earlier public 

meeting to discuss these particular issues in greater detail.

 

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No: II-11-053

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416 

 August 31, 2011

E-mail: OPA2.Resource@nrc.gov
PARAMETER SEP '04OCT '04NOV '04DEC '04JAN '05FEB '05MAR '05APR '05MAY '05JUN '05JUL '05AUG '05

ARSENIC ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND BORON ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND CADMIUM 2.484 1.82 2.455 2.38 2.6825 2.31 2.132 2.81 2.245 2.6025 2.245 2.424 CHROMIUM 55.86 58.3542.0475 54.92 55.5 58.225 54.92 52.85 41.225 48.7 44.15 45.98 COPPER 739.4 744.25 757.75 699.6 679 696.75 634.2 600.75 605.25 640.75 623.5 680.6 LEAD 216.6 215.25 186.5 183.6 188 192.5 168.4 163 165 172.25 156.75 192 MERCURY 3.816 3.7375 3.7475 2.928 3.035 3.285 3.002 2.95 2.61 2.55 2.5275 2.362 MOLYBDENUM 35.74 36.6 32.025 26.64 18.4 14.7 13.76 11.675 12.125 14.9 22.2 26.52 NICKEL 25.04 26.65 25 26.06 26.625 28.9 27.54 27.42524.37523.875 23.3 23.58 SELENIUM 5.184 5.985 5.7475 5.742 5.6225 5.8575 5.9 6.0525 5.1075 5.805 5.655 5.534 ZINC 1248 1250 1262.5 1230 1180 1270 1192 1130 1077 1145 1080 1160

PARAMETER SEP 'O5OCT 'O5NOV '05DEC '05JAN '06FEB '06MAR '06APR '06MAY' 06JUN' 06JUL' 06AUG '06 ARSENIC ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND BORON ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND CADMIUM 2.135 2.5275 2.178 2.2575 2.335 2.3975 2.238 2.0775 2.315 2.035 2.1 1.846 CHROMIUM 41.85 45.6 49.64 46.3 46.5 55.475 64.38 58.875 61.925 73.425 66.9 62.66 COPPER 676.75 695.75 643 623.25 653.75 665.5 651.6 613 643.75 624.5 583 628 LEAD 167.5 178 176 164.75 174.5 195.25 159.2 140 169 219 226 212.4 MERCURY 2.1575 2.185 2.112 2.8325 2.04 1.835 1.82 1.91252.14752.1175 1.5 1.236 MOLYBDENUM 34.825 39.2 22.84 14.25 11.69 10.2325 9.694 13.12516.9725 16.4 21.8 22.3 NICKEL 21.42525.025 23.32 23.02525.375 24.6 25.92 23.65 25.1 27.625 26.4 23.36 SELENIUM 5.1925 5.1725 5.256 5.5375 4.82 4.7025 3.938 4.7475 5.7825 5.4 6.2 5.554 ZINC 1130 1215 1112 1107.5 1155 1177.5 1126 1095 1185 1217.5 1152 1182 MWRA BIOSOLID PELLET METALS ANALYSIS, SEPTEMBER '04 THROUGH AUGUST '06

All concentrations are expressed in mg/kg, dry weight basis
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed July 19, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-0340

Lower Tribunal No. 19-4994 CC

________________

Projekt Property Restoration, Inc. a/a/o Yessenia & Andres 

Arias,

Appellant,

vs.

Citizens Property Insurance Corporation,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Michael G. 

Barket, Judge.

Valiente, Carollo & McElligott, PLLC and Matthew McElligott and 

Caroline Carollo, for appellant.

Kelley Kronenberg, P.A., and Kimberly J. Fernandes (Tallahassee), for 

appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, SCALES and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit
          32.1**
  **CERTIFICATION
          PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of Victoria Industries, Inc. a Nevada
        corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31,
        2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
        (the “Report”), Albert Abdoulline, Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
        certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
        adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        Victoria Industries, Inc., and will be retained by Victoria Idustries, Inc.
        and
        furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request.
 
 Date:
                  April 15, 2008By:
              /s/
                  Albert AbdoullineAlbert
                  AbdoullineChief
                  Executive Officer
§ 280.215 Interlocutory review of rulings. ( a ) At the request of a party, or on the administrative law judge's own initiative, the administrative law judge may certify to the Under Secretary for review a ruling that does not finally dispose of a proceeding, if the administrative law judge determines that immediate review may hasten or facilitate the final disposition of the matter.
( b ) Upon certification to the Under Secretary of the interlocutory ruling for review, the parties will have 10 days to file and serve briefs stating their positions, and five days to file and serve replies, following which the Under Secretary will decide the matter promptly.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jefferson Bancshares, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by
                  the Report.


         May 10, 2005          /s/ Anderson L. Smith
                               --------------------------------------
                               Anderson L. Smith
                               President and Chief Executive Officer



         May 10, 2005          /s/ Jane P. Hutton
                               ------------------------------------------------
                               Jane P. Hutton
                               Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Raphel A. Hall, Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 141]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John F. O’Donnell, J.), rendered August 18, 2005. The judgment convicted defendant, after a nonjury trial, of assault in the third degree and menacing in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed. Present — Pigott, Jr., PJ., Hurlbutt, Martoche and Green, JJ.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 9, 2010 

p0830 

Order 

 

September 9, 2010 

141025 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141025 

 COA: 294440 

Wayne CC: 04-010421-01 

CHARLES PAYTON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 31, 2010 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

DAVIS, J., not participating. I recuse myself and am not participating because I 

was on the Court of Appeals panel in this case. See MCR 2.003(B).
### SUBCHAPTER VII—VEHICLES AND FUELS
#### § 280.325 Cumulative listing of recordal information.

The Director, USPTO, shall maintain a record of the names, current addresses, and legal entities of all recorded manufacturers and their recorded insignia.

[65 FR 39804, June 28, 2000]
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

January 8, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134896 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

v SC: 134896 Justices 

 COA: 278544 

JEFFREY RICHARD MOORE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

Wayne CC: 06-004980 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 21, 2007 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t1217 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 8, 2008 

Clerk
### Part A—National Institutes of Health
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-12-0016 - 2011 Annual Report on Commission Adjudication

Accession Number: ML12032A114

Date Released: Monday, February 13, 2012

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML12032A117 - SECY-12-0016 - 2011 Annual Report on Commission Adjudication (5 page(s), 1/30/2012)
    - ML12032A122 - SECY-12-0016 - Attachment --- Chart (7 page(s), 1/30/2012)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### Joseph Seguin, Appellant, v. Herbert Myers, Respondent. Mary Seguin, Appellant, v. Herbert Myers, Respondent.

Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ., concur.
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed April 9, 2019.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-18-01466-CV

DAVID LEMON, FA EDGEPOINT SERVICES, LLC, AND ORANGE LEAF 

VENTURES, LLC, Appellants

V.

STRAIT CAPITAL COMPANY, LTD., Appellee

On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-08245

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Myers, Osborne, and Nowell

Opinion by Justice Osborne

Before the Court is appellants’ March 29, 2019 motion to dismissthe appeal. In the motion, 

appellants state the parties have settled their claims and ask us to dismiss this appeal. We grant 

the motion. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1.

We dismiss the appeal.

181466F.P05

/Leslie Osborne/

LESLIE OSBORNE

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

DAVID LEMON, FA EDGEPOINT 

SERVICES, LLC, AND ORANGE LEAF 

VENTURES, LLC, Appellants

No. 05-18-01466-CV V.

STRAIT CAPITAL COMPANY, LTD., 

Appellee

On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-08245.

Opinion delivered by Justice Osborne, 

Justices Myers and Nowell participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that each party bear its own costs of appeal.

Judgment entered this 9th day of April, 2019.
```

[108th Congress Public Law 37]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ037.108]

[[Page 117 STAT. 832]]

Public Law 108-37
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To designate the regional headquarters building for the National Park 
 Service under construction in Omaha, Nebraska, as the ``Carl T. Curtis 
          National Park Service Midwest Regional Headquarters 
            Building''. <<NOTE: June 26, 2003 -  [S. 703]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF CARL T. CURTIS NATIONAL PARK SERVICE 
                              MIDWEST REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS 
                              BUILDING.

    The regional headquarters building for the National Park Service 
under construction in Omaha, Nebraska, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Carl T. Curtis National Park Service Midwest Regional Headquarters 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the regional headquarters building 
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Carl 
T. Curtis National Park Service Midwest Regional Headquarters Building.

    Approved June 26, 2003.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 703:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 108-135 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 149 (2003):
            Apr. 11, considered and passed Senate.
            June 16, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```