alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OPENING REMARKS OF NRC CHAIRMAN GREGORY B. JACZKO AT TODAY’S

BRIEFING ON THE AGENCY ACTION REVIEW MEETING

Good morning. The Commission meets today to receive a briefing on the results of the 

Agency Action Review Meeting (AARM). This is among the most important meetings the 

Commission holds every year. It provides us the opportunity to publicly review licensee safety 

performance over the previous year, and to focus on the most significant safety challenges that 

licensees experienced. The issues we will be discussing today are at the heart of our public health 

and safety mission.

In 2010, both reactor and material licensees demonstrated good overall performance. We 

did identify, however, some significant issues at certain facilities. Among those facilities is 

Nuclear Fuel Services (NFS), which has experienced several safety issues over the past few 

years. During today’s discussion, the Commission would like to hear what concrete steps NFS 

plans to take to address these safety issues and to ensure that they do not appear at next year’s 

AARM meeting. The Commission also will hear from representatives from the Department of 

Veterans’ Affairs (VA) about the steps they have taken since last year’s meeting to address the 

issues that led to multiple events at the VA Medical Center in Philadelphia. 

While no reactor licensee met the criteria for participating in this year’s AARM meeting, 

we did identify some concerning issues at certain plants over the past year. Right now, there are 

three reactor licensees in Column 3 of the Reactor Oversight Process Action Matrix. One plant—

Brown’s Ferry—is currently in Column 4 after experiencing an issue of high safety significance 

late last year. It’s clear that both the agency and its licenses need to continue to maintain a strong 

safety focus to avoid those types of challenges.

During today’s meeting, the Commission first will hear presentations from the NRC staff, 

and then from two panels of representatives from the Nuclear Fuel Services and the Department 

of Veterans’ Affairs. 

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC’s website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-091 May 27, 2011
§ 2017.1 Petition for review. ( a ) Any person may submit a petition to USTR in accordance with this section with respect to the compliance of any country listed in section 107 of the AGOA (19 U.S.C. 3706), with the eligibility requirements set forth in section 104 of the AGOA (19 U.S.C. 3703) and the eligibility criteria set forth in section 502 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2462).
( b ) A petition must: ( 1 ) Identify the sub-Saharan African country that would be subject to the review;
( 2 ) Indicate the specific eligibility requirement or criterion that the petitioner believes warrants review; and
( 3 ) Include all available supporting arguments and information to explain why review is warranted.
( c ) A petition requesting an out-of-cycle review under section 111(d)(4) of the AGOA (19 U.S.C. 2466a(d)(4)) must contain a statement indicating the existence of exceptional circumstances warranting the out-of-cycle review.
( d ) The TPSC may request additional information.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

November 26, 2004.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-7588.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with December 12, 1988, court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                     *Veterans Administration*, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's notice is for the purposes of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: November 18, 2004.

Mark R. Johnston,

Director, Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs.

[FR Doc. 04-25985 Filed 11-24-04; 8:45 pm]

BILLING CODE 4210-29-M
### §1312. Functions

(a) Principal Forum.—The Chief Acquisition Officers Council is the principal interagency forum for monitoring and improving the Federal acquisition system.

(b) Functions.—The Council shall perform functions that include the following:

(1) Develop recommendations for the Director of the Office of Management and Budget on Federal acquisition policies and requirements.

(2) Share experiences, ideas, best practices, and innovative approaches related to Federal acquisition.

(3) Assist the Administrator in the identification, development, and coordination of multiagency projects and other innovative initiatives to improve Federal acquisition.

(4) Promote effective business practices that ensure the timely delivery of best value products to the Federal Government and achieve appropriate public policy objectives.

(5) Further integrity, fairness, competition, openness, and efficiency in the Federal acquisition system.

(6) Work with the Office of Personnel Management to assess and address the hiring, training, and professional development needs of the Federal Government related to acquisition.

(7) Work with the Administrator and the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council to promote the business practices referred to in paragraph (4) and other results of the functions carried out under this subsection.

(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3694.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1312(a) | 41:414b(d). | Pub. L. 93–400, §16A(d), (e), as added Pub. L. 108–136, title XIV, §1422(a), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1668. |
| 1312(b) | 41:414b(e). | |

Section
### SUBCHAPTER IV—PRIVATIZATION OF CORPORATION
No. III-08-030 

Contact: Viktoria Mitlyng 

Phone: 630-829-9663 

Prema Chandrathil 

Phone: 630-829-9663 

 August 5, 2008 

 E-Mail: opa3@nrc.gov 

Web site: www.nrc.gov

NRC BEGINS SPECIAL INSPECTION AT 

PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR PLANT DUE TO REACTOR TRIP 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is conducting a special inspection at the Prairie Island 

Nuclear Power Station to review the causes of a reactor trip (automatic shutdown) and a subsequent trip 

of one of two auxiliary feedwater pumps. The two-unit plant operated by Xcel Energy is located near Red 

Wing, Minn. 

 

On July 31, 2008, at 8:17 a.m. Prairie Island Unit 1 reactor tripped and was shut down safely. 

Unit 2 was not affected. 

“Although public health and safety were not at risk as a result of the event, it is important for us 

to understand what caused the trip and the problem with the auxiliary feedwater pump,” said Regional 

Administrator James Caldwell. “Our special inspection team is also tasked with reviewing the utility’s 

corrective actions and the company’s analysis of the extent of the problem.” 

The reactor trip occurred when a component of the reactor trip system failed and provided a trip 

signal to the reactor. All plant systems responded as expected during the shutdown with the exception of 

the turbine driven auxiliary feed water pump. The pump started as expected but tripped shortly thereafter. 

Auxiliary feedwater pumps provide back-up water supply to the reactor. 

Region III dispatched a three-person special inspection team to the plant to review the root 

causes of the reactor trip and the turbine driven auxiliary feedwater pump issue. The special inspection 

will also review the utility’s response to the situation and the company’s corrective actions. 

 The duration of a special inspection cannot be determined in advance. The average duration of a 

special inspection is seven days. The inspection report will be issued about 45 days after the inspection is 

complete. It will be available through the NRC RIII Office of Public Affairs and at the NRC web site: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html 

When Unit 1 was being returned to service on August 3, plant operators declared an Unusual 

Event due to elevated levels of hydrazine, an ammonia-like chemical in the turbine building. An Unusual 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region III 

2443 Warrenville Road 

Lisle IL 60532 
Event is the lowest level of emergency in the NRC’s emergency classification system. The company 

terminated the Unusual Event later on the same day when levels of hydrazine were successfully reduced. 

The special inspection team will review the circumstances around the Unusual Event. 

 

### 

 NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
§ 1014.6 Request for correction or amendment to a record. ( a ) Any individual who has reviewed a record pertaining to himself or herself may request the Executive Director to correct or amend all or any part of the record.
( b ) Each request for a correction or amendment of a record shall be in writing and shall contain the following information: ( 1 ) The name of the individual requesting the correction or amendment;
( 2 ) The name or other description of the system of records in which the record sought to be amended is maintained;
( 3 ) The location of that record in the system of records to the extent that it is known;
( 4 ) A copy of the record sought to be amended or a description of that record;
( 5 ) A statement of the material in the record that should be corrected or amended;
( 6 ) A statement of the specific wording of the correction or amendment sought; and
( 7 ) A statement of the basis for the requested correction or amendment including any material that the individual can furnish to substantiate the reasons for the amendment sought.
[40 FR 53381, Nov. 18, 1975, as amended at 42 FR 22878, May 5, 1977]
#### Francisicka Wesolowski, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. Edward H. Butler, Individually and as Executor, etc., Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL**

**EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Bekem Metals, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Yermek Kudabayev, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Date:  July 30, 2009 | By: | /s/ Yermek Kudabayev |  
 

Yermek Kudabayev

 

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

  |
|----------------------|-----|----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
##### 



Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Siliconware Precision Industries
Co., Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Wen Chung Lin, a Director and the Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:



| | 3. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 4. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

Date: June 26, 2003

| |  |                                                               
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | By: /s/ Wen Chung Lin                                         
| |  |                                                               
| |  | Name: Wen Chung Lin
Title:   Director; Chief Executive Officer



|* |  | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
|- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
### §5501A. Beneficiaries' rights in mental competence determinations

The Secretary may not make an adverse determination concerning the mental capacity of a beneficiary to manage monetary benefits paid to or for the beneficiary by the Secretary under this title unless such beneficiary has been provided all of the following, subject to the procedures and timelines prescribed by the Secretary for determinations of incompetency:

(1) Notice of the proposed adverse determination and the supporting evidence.

(2) An opportunity to request a hearing.

(3) An opportunity to present evidence, including an opinion from a medical professional or other person, on the capacity of the beneficiary to manage monetary benefits paid to or for the beneficiary by the Secretary under this title.

(4) An opportunity to be represented at no expense to the Government (including by counsel) at any such hearing and to bring a medical professional or other person to provide relevant testimony at any such hearing.

(Added Pub. L. 114–255, div. B, title XIV, §14017(a), Dec. 13, 2016, 130 Stat. 1307.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 114–255, div. B, title XIV, §14017(c), Dec. 13, 2016, 130 Stat. 1307, provided that: "Section 5501A of title 38, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply to determinations made by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs on or after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 13, 2016]."
No. IV-13-04

Contact: Victor Dricks (817) 200-1128

 Lara Uselding (817) 200-1519

 

January 28, 2013

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

NRC INSPECTION TEAMS ARRIVE AT FORT CALHOUN NUCLEAR PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Monday launched a series of inspections at the 

Fort Calhoun nuclear plant to examine the plant’s restart checklist and evaluate a recent cooling 

water pump issue. The plant, operated by the Omaha Public Power District (OPPD), is located 19 

miles north of Omaha, Neb. and has been closed since the April 2011 Missouri River floods.

NRC inspectors will evaluate a condition, reported on Dec. 2, 2012, involving four main 

water pumps incorrectly anchored using shorter bolts than required. The pumps, referred to by 

the operator as raw water pumps, provide the main cooling water from the Missouri River to the 

plant. Shorter bolts may have caused the pumps to be inoperable following extreme ground 

motion during an earthquake. 

Other NRC inspectors and headquarters personnel are reviewing various items from the 

restart checklist that include flooding, fire, and an ongoing safety culture evaluation. 

About 450 items need to be inspected for adequacy prior to any restart authorization decision

under the NRC restart basis document.

“As we continue our work to oversee OPPD’s corrective actions to address the restart 

checklist, additional NRC inspectors are on site to ensure that the plant operator has taken the 

appropriate steps to replace the pump bolts,” said Region IV Administrator Elmo E. Collins.

The NRC inspectors will write a publicly available inspection report on their findings 

within 45 days of the end of the inspection.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV

 1600 E. Lamar Blvd.

 Arlington, TX 76011-4511

Telephone: (817) 860-8100

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov
### §15704. Inspector General; records

(a) Appointment of Inspector General.—There shall be an Inspector General for the Commissions appointed in accordance with section 403(a) of title 5. All of the Commissions shall be subject to a single Inspector General.

(b) Records of a Commission.—

(1) In general.—A Commission shall maintain accurate and complete records of all its transactions and activities.

(2) Availability.—All records of a Commission shall be available for audit and examination by the Inspector General (including authorized representatives of the Inspector General).

(c) Records of Recipients of Commission Assistance.—

(1) In general.—A recipient of funds from a Commission under this subtitle shall maintain accurate and complete records of transactions and activities financed with the funds and report to the Commission on the transactions and activities.

(2) Availability.—All records required under paragraph (1) shall be available for audit by the Commission and the Inspector General (including authorized representatives of the Commission and the Inspector General).

(d) Annual Audit.—The Inspector General shall audit the activities, transactions, and records of each Commission on an annual basis.

(Added Pub. L. 110–234, title XIV, §14217(a)(2), May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1480, and Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title XIV, §14217(a)(2), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 2242; amended Pub. L. 117–286, §4(b)(70), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4350.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 enacted identical sections. Pub. L. 110–234 was repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

#### Amendments

2022—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 117–286 substituted "section 403(a) of title 5." for "section 3(a) of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.)."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the first day of the first fiscal year beginning after June 18, 2008, see section 14217(d) of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as a note under section 15101 of this title.
#### § 1014.11 Penalties.

Any person who makes a false statement in connection with any request for a record, or an amendment thereto, under this part, is subject to the penalties prescribed in 18 U.S.C. 494, 495, and 1001; and 5 U.S.C. 552a(i)(3).
### subpart vii—drug pricing agreements
No: IV-13-037 December 9, 2013

CONTACT: Victor Dricks (817) 200-1128

Lara Uselding (817) 100-1519

NRC Monitoring Event at Arkansas Nuclear One

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has activated its incident response center in Arlington, 

Texas, following the declaration of an Unusual Event at the Arkansas Nuclear One nuclear power plant. 

The plant, operated by Entergy Operations, Inc., is located in Russellville, Ark.

The Unusual Event was declared by operators at 8 a.m. CST after Unit 2 experienced a 

transformer explosion in an electrical switchyard. The interruption of electrical power to Unit 2 caused 

protective systems to shut down the reactor.

Operators will keep the Unit 2 reactor offline while the cause of the explosion is investigated 

and a determination is made on what repairs are necessary. Unit 1 remains operating at about 95 

percent power.

No radiation releases have been reported. Power is being supplied to Unit 2 by an emergency 

diesel generator and one source of offsite power and plant conditions are stable. There are normally two 

sources of offsite power.

An Unusual Event is the lowest of four nuclear emergency classifications and means events 

indicate a potential degradation of the level of safety of a plant. The NRC’s senior resident inspector 

assigned to the site is inside the plant’s control room monitoring the licensee’s response to the event.