alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2 Certification of Annual
Report **** Pursuant
to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned
officer of Worldwide Energy and Manufacturing USA, Inc.. (the Company), hereby
certifies that, to the undersigneds knowledge:  (1)
the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and  (2)
the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.  Date: April
13, 2009  /s/ John
Ballard Name: John
Ballard Chief Financial
Officer
CERTIFICATIONS OF
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 32

# CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 200218 U.S.C. SECTION
1350)

In connection with the Annual Report
of AMERICAN ENERGY PRODUCTION, INC., a Delaware corporation (the Company), on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), Charles Bitters, Principal Executive and Principal
Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to their knowledge:

(1)    
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and   

(2)     The information contained in the
          Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
          result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Charles BittersCharles BittersPrincipal
Executive OfficerApril 14, 2005

/s/ Charles Bitters Charles BittersPrincipal Financial
Officer

April 14, 2005

[A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to AMERICAN ENERGY PRODUCTION, INC.
and will be retained by AMERICAN ENERGY PRODUCTION, INC. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
### §1324. Strategic plan

(a) In General.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of the Federal Acquisition Supply Chain Security Act of 2018, the Council shall develop a strategic plan for addressing supply chain risks posed by the acquisition of covered articles and for managing such risks that includes—

(1) the criteria and processes required under section 1323(a) of this title, including a threshold and requirements for sharing relevant information about such risks with all executive agencies and, as appropriate, with other Federal entities and non-Federal entities;

(2) an identification of existing authorities for addressing such risks;

(3) an identification and promulgation of best practices and procedures and available resources for executive agencies to assess and mitigate such risks;

(4) recommendations for any legislative, regulatory, or other policy changes to improve efforts to address such risks;

(5) recommendations for any legislative, regulatory, or other policy changes to incentivize the adoption of best practices for supply chain risk management by the private sector;

(6) an evaluation of the effect of implementing new policies or procedures on existing contracts and the procurement process;

(7) a plan for engaging with executive agencies, the private sector, and other nongovernmental stakeholders to address such risks;

(8) a plan for identification, assessment, mitigation, and vetting of supply chain risks from existing and prospective information and communications technology made available by executive agencies to other executive agencies through common contract solutions, shared services, acquisition vehicles, or other assisted acquisition services; and

(9) plans to strengthen the capacity of all executive agencies to conduct assessments of—

(A) the supply chain risk posed by the acquisition of covered articles; and

(B) compliance with the requirements of this subchapter.

(b) Submission to Congress.—Not later than 7 calendar days after completion of the strategic plan required by subsection (a), the Chairperson of the Council shall submit the plan to the appropriate congressional committees and leadership.

(Added Pub. L. 115–390, title II, §202(a), Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5184.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of the enactment of the Federal Acquisition Supply Chain Security Act of 2018, referred to in subsec. (a), is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 115–390, which was approved Dec. 21, 2018.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 90 days after Dec. 21, 2018, and applicable to contracts that are awarded before, on, or after that date, see section 202(c) of Pub. L. 115–390, set out as a note under section 1321 of this title.

Title II of Pub. L. 115–390 effective 90 days after Dec. 21, 2018, see section 205 of Pub. L. 115–390, set out as a note under section 1321 of this title.
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Jeffery W. King (Impleaded), Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 56926;

First District (3rd Division)

August 1, 1974.

James J. Doherty, Public Defender, of Chicago, for appellant.

Bernard Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago, for the People.

PER CURIAM.

DEMPSEY, J., took no part.
Organizing YourRussian Business: When to Do a Joint Venture

----
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2478

To reinstate the authority of the Federal Communications Commission and 

local franchising authorities to regulate the rates for cable television service. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 16, 2003

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL

To reinstate the authority of the Federal Communications 

Commission and local franchising authorities to regulate 

the rates for cable television service.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 The Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cable Consumer Rights 

5 Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL. 

7 Subsection (b) of section 301 of the Telecommuni8 cations Act of 1996 is repealed. 
2

•HR 2478 IH 

1 SEC. 3. REINSTATEMENT OF PRIOR LAW. 

2 Section 623 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 

3 U.S.C. 543) shall be effective as if section 301(b) of the 

4 Telecommunications Act of 1934 had not been enacted. 

5 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

6 The provisions of this Act shall be effective 90 days 

7 after the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
Beacon 490P X

Com plex strontium aluminate, rare earth doped
§ 870.404 Withholdings and contributions provisions that apply to both Basic and Optional insurance. ( a ) Withholdings (and Government contributions, when applicable) are based on the amount of insurance last in force on an employee during the pay period.
( b ) Withholdings are not required for the period between the end of the pay period in which an employee separates from service and the date his/her annuity or compensation begins.
( c ) No payment is required while an insured employee is in nonpay status for up to 12 months. Exception: an employee who is in nonpay status while receiving compensation.
( d ) The deposit described in §§ 870.401(f) and 870.402(f) must be made no later than 60 calendar days after the date the employing office determines the amount of the underdeduction that has occurred, regardless of whether or when the underdeduction is recovered by the agency. The agency must determine whether to waive collection of the overpayment of pay, in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 5584, as implemented by 4 CFR chapter I, subchapter G. However, if the agency involved is excluded from the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 5584, it may use any applicable authority to waive the collection.
( e ) Effective October 21, 1972, when there is an official finding that an employee was suspended or fired erroneously, no withholdings are made from the back pay. Exception: if death or accidental dismemberment occurs during the period between the employee's removal and the finding that the agency action was erroneous, premiums are withheld from the back pay awarded.
( f ) If an individual's periodic pay, compensation, or annuity isn't sufficient to cover the full withholdings, any amount available for life insurance withholding must be applied first to Basic insurance, with any remainder applied to Optional insurance (first to Option B, then Option A, then Option C).
[62 FR 48731, Sept. 17, 1997, as amended at 68 FR 59082, Oct. 14, 2003; 75 FR 60578, Oct. 1, 2010]
Order entered May 21, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00392-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.M.M. AND C.N.M., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 301st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-l7-09018

ORDER

This is an appeal involving the termination of appellant’s parental rights. Before the 

Court is appellant’s May 17, 2019 motion requesting a free copy of the record and an extension 

of time to file a brief. We GRANT the motion. We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send 

appellant a paper copy of the clerk’s record filed on April 4, 2019 and the reporter’s record filed 

on May 3, 2019. Appellant shall file his brief on the merits by June 12, 2019.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG 

JUSTICE
No: II-13-40 June 4, 2013

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416

NRC Schedules Meeting to Discuss Reactor Vessel Repair at Harris Nuclear Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a public meeting for Thursday, 

June 13, to discuss its special inspection regarding the discovery of a quarter-inch flaw in a reactor 

vessel head nozzle at the Shearon Harris nuclear plant and the ensuing repairs by Duke Energy.

The plant, operated by Duke, is located near New Hill, N.C., about 20 miles southwest of 

Raleigh.

The meeting is scheduled for 6 p.m. at the Holly Springs Cultural Center, 300 W. Ballentine 

St., Holly Springs, N.C. The public is invited to attend the meeting and participate in the discussion 

with NRC officials. 

The plant was shut down on May 15 when further analysis of ultrasonic data gathered during 

an earlier refueling outage revealed an irregularity about one-quarter inch long in a nozzle on the vessel 

head. The flaw did not penetrate the vessel head wall and there was no leakage. Duke Energy has 

completed repairs and expects to restart the unit soon.

“We have verified that the condition has been corrected and the plant can be operated safely,” 

said Victor McCree, NRC Region II Administrator. “Although there was no threat to people living near 

the plant, we felt it was important to conduct a follow-up meeting to answer questions residents might 

have.” 

The NRC dispatched two specialized inspectors from the Region II offices in Atlanta to 

supplement the plant’s resident inspectors in assessing the events leading up to the discovery of the 

flaw. They also examined previous ultrasonic test records for the vessel head and evaluated the 

company’s repair of the problem. Preliminary findings of the inspection team will be discussed at the 

meeting, and the final inspection report will be released by mid-July.
#### § 995.22 Training of data users.

CED or CEVAD shall provide some form of product training and education materials to the customer to ensure that the end user has a sufficient level of information about the intended use of the derived product and what is needed to properly use it (e.g., requires certain equipment).
### §6714. Relocation services

(a) Use of District of Columbia Government.—The Administrator of General Services may use the services of the District of Columbia government in the administration of a relocation program pursuant to the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.). The Administrator shall reimburse the government for the cost of the services.

(b) Coordination of Relocation Programs.—All relocation services performed by or on behalf of the Administrator shall be coordinated with the District of Columbia's central relocation programs.

(c) Preferential Rights of Displaced Owners and Tenants.—An owner or tenant of real property whose residence or business is terminated as a result of acquisitions made pursuant to this subchapter or the Pennsylvania Avenue Development Corporation Act of 1972 (Public Law 92–578, 86 Stat. 1266) shall be granted a preferential right to lease or purchase from the Administrator similar real property as may become available for a similar use. The preferential right is limited to the parties in interest and is not transferable or assignable.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1197.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6714 | 40:877(b)–(d). | Pub. L. 92–578, §8(b)–(d), Oct. 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1273; Pub. L. 95–629, title I, §101(1)(f), Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3635. |

Section

In subsection (c), the words "retail, wholesale, service or other" and "or its agent" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "upon implementation of the development plan" are omitted as obsolete.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 91–646, Jan. 2, 1971, 84 Stat. 1894, which is classified principally to chapter 61 (§4601 et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4601 of Title 42 and Tables.

The Pennsylvania Avenue Development Corporation Act of 1972, referred to in subsec. (c), is Pub. L. 92–578, Oct. 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1266, which was classified to chapter 19 (§871 et seq.) of former Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, prior to repeal and reenactment as section 6701 of this title and this subchapter by Pub. L. 107–217, §§1, 6(b), Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062, 1304. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.
# GAINESVflL E M A G A Z I N Riiiul y McCloi' v Accoun t Executiv e 270 0 S.W. n" " Street, Gainesville , Plorid a3260 8 (352)374-507 1 Randall,McClory@gvilIesun.co m Augus t 17,201 0 Aloh aLe y _~ - - - Associat e Directo r

~ " " j^^r^i^;" ' Smal l Communit

y Ai r Servic e Development

Progran t (SCASDP ) , ^ ~'^^rJ^

- nloha.lev(«).dQt.po v '

_^ ^ ' Re : Smai l ConnnuHft

y Ai r Servic e Deveiopnieii t

Gran t ^- ^ Dea r Ms . Ley , Th e Gainesvill e Su

n full y support s th e Gaiiiesville-Alachu aCounl y Regiona l Airpor t Authorily' s reques t fo r aSmal l Communit

y Ai r Servic e Developmen t

grant t o help suppor

t th e ne w America

n Engl e Airline s servic e betwee n Gainesvill e an d Miam i and th e existin g loca

l air carriers , DeltaAi r

Line s and U S Airways . W

e recogniz e th e importanc e o f ai r servic e t o economi c developmen t and th e qualit

y o f lif e fo r resident s and visitor s i

n our region . W e wan t t o hel p ensur e th e succes s o f th e ne w American Airline s servic e betwee n Gainesvill e an d th e Miam i hub . W e ar e already workin g closel y wit h th e Airport

Authorit y and matchin g fund s spent . Th e lack o f ai r sei-vic e t o Sout h Florid aand adequat e connectin g servic e t o internatiofja J destination s ha s force d man

y t o commute t

o an d fio mothe r

airport s o r

mak e th e exhaustin g 5 + hou

r tri p t o Miam

i b y automobile . Additionally , American' s extensiv e domesti c an d international route structure fro mMiam i wil l provid e ne w tiave l option s and agreate r level o f frequency . Du e t o th e critical Importanc e o f qualit y ai r servic e fo

r our region , w e ar e committe d t o supportin g American' s ne w sei-vic e an d continue d improvement i n ai r seivice . Therefore , w e wil l matc h fund s spen t wit h Gainesvill e Sun an

d Gainesville.co mt o hel p Aineiican Airline s establis h it s new route between GN V an d MIA . Wit

h Th e Gainesvill e Sun an d Gainesville.com' s 192,78 0 dail y readers , w e believ e our donatio n fo

r advertisin g wil l help mak e th e new sei'vic e successful . I urg e yo u t o procee d wit

h ap])rovin g th e Airpor

t Authority' s reques t

fo r agran t t o assis t wit h marketin g effort s fo r th e nex t tw o years . I

f yo u hav e an y question s aboti t Gainesvill e Sun , pleas e fee l fre e t o contac t m e Sincerely , Randal l J . McClor

y Account Executiv e Gainesvill e Sun/Gainesville.co m Pag e 6 1
EXHIBIT 23.1
                                                                    ------------




                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements Form
S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-45618 and 333-65878) pertaining to the 1995 Share
Option and Incentive Plan, 1998 Share Option and Incentive Plan, 2000 Employees
Share Purchase Plan, Amended and Restated 1998 Share Option and Incentive Plan
and the Precise Software Solutions Ltd. Stock Option Plan (F/K/A Savant
Corporation Stock Option Plan) and Form S-3 (Registration Nos. 333-81620 and
333-65876) of Precise Software Solutions Ltd. and in the related prospectus of
our report dated January 18, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Precise Software Solutions Ltd. included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.


                                                      Yours Truly,

                                              /s/  KOST, FORER and GABBAY

March 29, 2002                                   KOST, FORER and GABBAY
Tel-Aviv, Israel                         A Member of Ernst & Young International
Kyrgyzstan UpdatesTax Legislation

----
### SUBCHAPTER I—PROMOTION OF COMMERCIAL SPACE OPPORTUNITIES
From: Simon [shsiung@swri.org] 

Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 7:04 AM 

To: Bartlett, Matthew; 'Simon'; Asadul Chowdhury; Sircar, Madhumita; 'John 

Miller'; thomasjh@comcast.net 

Cc: Guardiola, Maria 

Subject: Summary of Call between INIS and the Seismic/Structural reviewers regarding 

follow-up to RAI responses 

From: Bartlett, Matthew [mailto:Matthew.Bartlett@nrc.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 7:38 AM 

To: Simon; Asadul Chowdhury; Sircar, Madhumita; John Miller; thomasjh@comcast.net

Cc: Guardiola, Maria 

Subject: Summary of Seismic/Structural Call with INIS 

Summary of Call between INIS and the Seismic/Structural reviewers regarding follow-up to RAI 

responses 

On Monday May 16, 2011 the NRC staff held a conference call with International 

Isotopes Inc. (INIS) to discuss the seismic and structural review. The purpose of the call 

was to request clarification on several RAI responses that INIS had previously provided. 

The NRC structural reviewer requested information on flooding. INIS’s written response 

to RAI SS-2 indicates Department of Energy (DOE) standards were used to evaluate the 

flood hazards. However, INIS’ response did not explain why flooding is not a hazard to 

the INIS facility. The NRC requests additional technical justification for the conclusions 

drawn regarding flooding. The NRC staff also requests clarification on how berms/dams 

are used to prevent site flooding and whether these measures should be declared 

IROFS. The NRC staff also requests the applicant to provide the associated technical 

basis. 

The NRC seismic reviewers noted that RAI 7 has 6 sub-parts. INIS stated that the 

details for sub-parts 1-5 will not be available until the detailed design and site 

characterization are completed. The NRC reviewers clarified that detailed information 

was not needed, but rather information on the methodology (e.g. computer codes, soil 

analysis, etc.) that will be used to develop the design and site characterization. 

Information on the methodology would resolve the outstanding issues. This type of 

methodology information should be available prior to the detailed design or site 

characterization. 

INIS proposed conducting a conference call or site visit between the NRC seismic 

reviewers and the INIS seismic staff to discuss the RAIs. Prior to such a call/meeting a 

written request for the additional information (second round of RAIs) will be provided to 

INIS by NRC. The NRC seismic reviewers also noted that RAI 7 sub-part 3 and 4 were 

identical. INIS indicated this typo should be corrected. 

Sincerely, 

Matt Bartlett 

Project Manager 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 

NMSS/FCSS/AFCB 

(301)-492-3119
Institute of Nuclear Power OperationsInstitute of Nuclear Power Operations

Underground Piping UpdateUnderground Piping Update

© 2012 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations 

Piping UpdatePiping Update

Joseph SearsManager, Chemistry - INPONRC-NEI MeetingApril 4, 2011

Joseph SearsManager, Chemistry - INPONRC-NEI MeetingApril 4, 2011

7

13

3

80

100

120

tsApril 2012 Number of  Reported Events by Year and Failure Mode

Leak

Significant leak

Other degradation or maintenance

Adverse inspection finding (requires immediate repair within one cycle)

© 2012 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations 

71

91

69

12

3

5 8 4 22

4 13

0

20

40

60

2009 2010 2011 2012

Num

ber o

f Eve

nt

Year

117

80

100

120

140

mbe

r of E

vent

sApril 2012 Most Commonly Affected Systems

© 2012 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations 

48

36

17

11 108 7 6 6

0

20

40

60

Potable Water Distribution 

System

Fire Protection System (Water)

Essential Service Water 

System

Sanitary Waste Processing 

System

Nonessential Service Water 

System

No Industry Std. Name for this 

system

CVC/Makeup and Purification 

Sys. (PWR)

Circulating Water 

Structures

Condensate Storage and 

Transfer System

Wastewater Disposal System

Num

Contains Radioactive Material

5%

Safety Related10%

Contains Environmentally Sensitive Fluid

5%

Other Buried Piping-not run to failure

14%

April 2012 Buried Pipe Events Classification

© 2012 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations 

Other Buried Piping-run to failure

66%

Data source:  EPIX

Cracking6%

Galvanic Corrosion1%

General Corrosion19%

Other

Mechanical Overload6% Pitting

4%

April 2012 UPTI Task Force Failure Cause Codes

© 2012 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations 

Other Internal21%

Selective Leaching0%Flange, seal, or 

mechanical joint failure2%

Other41%
#### § 730.6 Control purposes.

The export control provisions of the EAR are intended to serve the national security, foreign policy, nonproliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and other interests of the United States, which in many cases are reflected in international obligations or arrangements. Some controls are designed to restrict access to items subject to the EAR by countries or persons that might apply such items to uses inimical to U.S. interests. These include controls designed to stem the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and controls designed to limit the military and terrorism support capability of certain countries. The effectiveness of many of the controls under the EAR is enhanced by their being maintained as part of multilateral control arrangements. Multilateral export control cooperation is sought through arrangements such as the Nuclear Suppliers Group, the Australia Group, and the Missile Technology Control Regime. The EAR also include some export controls to protect the United States from the adverse impact of the unrestricted export of commodities in short supply.

[61 FR 12734, Mar. 25, 1996, as amended at 78 FR 22705, Apr. 16, 2013]