alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 922

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

#### § 922.141 Definitions.

In addition to those definitions found at § 922.11, the following definitions apply to this subpart:

*Industrial material* means mineral, as defined in § 922.11.

*Traditional fishing* means those commercial or recreational fishing methods which have been conducted in the past within the Sanctuary.

[60 FR 66877, Dec. 27, 1995, as amended at 88 FR 968, Jan. 6, 2023]
No: IV-13-025 August 16, 2013

CONTACT: Lara Uselding (817) 200-1519

 Victor Dricks (817) 200-1128

NRC, Omaha Public Power District to Meet on Fort Calhoun Nuclear Station

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with officials from the Omaha Public Power 

District (OPPD) on Aug. 27 to hear the licensee’s strategic plans to ensure long-term performance 

improvement at the Fort Calhoun nuclear plant. The plant is located 19 miles north of Omaha, Neb. 

No restart decision will be made at the meeting. The NRC’s goal is to understand the proposed 

actions aimed at ensuring long-term performance improvement if a restart decision is granted.

The meeting will be held from 1:30-4:00 p.m. on Aug. 27, in the NRC’s Region IV office located 

at 1600 E. Lamar Blvd., in Arlington, Texas. The public will have an opportunity to ask questions of the 

NRC staff before the meeting is adjourned. Members of the public may also participate via phone by 

dialing 1-877-917-3405, and entering pass code 3179621.

OPPD officials will brief NRC staff on its Fort Calhoun Station plan for sustained improvement

and enhancements it believes will provide improved long-term performance post restart. The action plans 

involve enhancements to safety culture, corrective actions, design basis documents, procedures and other 

operating programs. 

There have been ongoing NRC inspections at the site looking at the short-term recovery actions 

prior to a restart decision. OPPD’s plan offers the first glimpse at detailed long-term plans to sustain 

performance improvement.
### SUBCHAPTER I—GRANTS TO STATES FOR OLD-AGE ASSISTANCE

#### Repeal of Subchapter I of This Chapter; Inapplicability of Repeal to Puerto Rico, Guam, and Virgin Islands

Pub. L. 92–603, title III, §303(a), (b), Oct. 30, 1972, 86 Stat. 1484, provided that this subchapter is repealed effective January 1, 1974, except with respect to Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 97–35, title XXI, §2184(a)(1), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 816, struck out "AND MEDICAL ASSISTANCE" after "OLD-AGE ASSISTANCE" in subchapter heading. Words "FOR THE AGED" following "AND MEDICAL ASSISTANCE" were editorially struck out.

Pub. L. 86–778, title VI, §601(a), Sept. 13, 1960, 74 Stat. 987, inserted "AND MEDICAL ASSISTANCE FOR THE AGED" at end of subchapter heading.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 7134** 

TOMMY WILLIAMS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. VANESSA CRAWFORD, Sheriff , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis trict of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Claude M. Hilton , Senior District Judge. ( 1:11

- cv - 00544

- CMH

- TRJ )

Submitted : October 4, 2011 Decided: October 11, 2011

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Tommy Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Tommy Williams, a Virginia inmate, brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action after correctional officials seized various items of his pe rsonal property. The district court dismissed his complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2006), and Williams now appeals. Because Williams had an adequate post

- deprivation remedy under Virginia law for the allegedly wrongful confiscation , his pro perty was not taken without due process. Hudson v. Palmer , 468 U.S. 517, 53 3

- 36 (1984) . Nor has Williams alleged that any interference with his legal mail caused him to suffer actual detriment to a legal proceeding. See Lewis v. Casey , 518 U.S. 343, 349

- 51 (1996) ; White v. White , 886 F.2d 721, 723 (4th Cir. 1989). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court an d argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Global Assets & Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending  December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").  I,
Bertram  Cutler,  President & CFO of the  company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Bertram Cutler
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Bertram Cutler, President & CFO

Dated:  August 6 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         112,429
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,175
<ALLOWANCES>                                       370
<INVENTORY>                                      6,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               138,978
<PP&E>                                           9,195
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,097
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 146,212
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,646
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           342
<OTHER-SE>                                     135,134
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   146,212
<SALES>                                         38,216
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                43,074
<CGS>                                           26,695
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,729
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,863
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (60)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,481)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,481)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,481)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.99)


</TABLE>
### **CHAPTER 21G—PREGNANT WORKER FAIRNESS**

Sec.
2000gg.
Definitions.
2000gg–1.
Nondiscrimination with regard to reasonable accommodations related to pregnancy.
2000gg–2.
Remedies and enforcement.
2000gg–3.
Rulemaking.
2000gg–4.
Waiver of State immunity.
2000gg–5.
Relationship to other laws.
2000gg–6.
Severability.
B.C.D. 02-74

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION QCT 3 0 2002

Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad Company

Mount Hood Railway Company

Oregon Short Line Railroad Company

Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Company

Spokane International Railroad Company

Des Chutes Railroad Company

This is the decision ofthe Railroad Retirement Board regarding the continued

status ofthe following railroads as employers under the Railroad Retirement and 

Railroad Unemployment Insurance Acts: Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad

Company (B.A. No. 8040), Mount Hood Railway Company (B.A. No. 3628), 

Oregon Short Line Railroad Company (B.A. No. 8041), Oregon-Washington

Railroad & Navigation Company (B.A. No. 8038), Spokane International Railroad

Company (B.A. No. 1614), and Des Chutes Railroad Company1.

The above railroads were all merged into the Union Pacific Railroad Company at

the end of December 19872.

Accordingly, the Board holds that Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad Company, 

Mount Hood Railway Company, Oregon Short Line Railroad Company, OregonWashington Railroad & Navigation Company, Spokane International Railroad

Company, and Des Chutes Railroad Company ceased to be employers under the

Railroad Retirement and Railroad Unemployment Insurance Acts effective with 

the close of business on December 31, 1987.

Original signed by:

Cherryl T. Thomas

V. M. Speakman, Jr.

Jerome F. Kever

1 No B.A. number was assigned to the De Chutes Railroad Company; however, it had been held to be a covered

employer under the Acts.

2 Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Company and Des Chutes Railroad Company were merged into the

Oregon Short Line Railroad Company before that company was merged into the Union Pacific.

.5
**Exhibit
      32.2**





Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§1350)





I,
      Michael A. Reisner, Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
      Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of ICON Capital Corp.,
      the Manager of the Registrant in connection with the Quarterly Report of ICON
      Income Fund Ten, LLC (the "LLC") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30,
      2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the "Quarterly Report") certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





1.
            The
                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                13(a) or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m);
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
                all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                the LLC.








*Dated:
      December 11, 2007*





*/s/Michael A. Reisner*


Michael
      A. Reisner


Director,
      Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Manager


(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)


ICON
      Capital Corp.


Manager
      of ICON Income Fund Ten, LLC
Start | Speaker Index 

2695 From Sea to Sea: Effects of Invasive Species in Marine Systems 

Sunday, February 20, 2011: 9:00 AM 

146B (Washington Convention Center ) 

Susan Williams , University of California, Bodega Bay, CA 

Non-native species have invaded over 80% of marine regions on Earth, including remote Antarctica. Over half of these species are considered harmful in 

their invaded habitats, causing changes in native marine ecosystems and exacting stiff economic costs from marine industries such as shipping and 

aquaculture, two of the main pathways for introductions. Control methods are particularly challenging in the fluid ocean and thus marine invasive species

management rests heavily on prevention. As countries adopt the international convention for the management of ship ballast water and the aquaculture 

industry strives to follow international codes for introductions and transfer of marine species, the prevention emphasis has shifted to other important 

pathways, such as hull fouling and the aquarium trade, and to emerging pathways such as plastic debris. The effects of marine invasive species are myriad: 

toxic microorganisms such as dinoflagellates and the cholera bacterium can affect human health while other species can change food webs and disrupt 

ecosystem services provided by marine wetland plants (salt marshes, seagrasses). Public attention has been diverted away from marine invasive species as 

awareness of ocean climate change grows, despite the facts that marine invaders are spreading twice as fast as marine species are shifting poleward as 

oceans warm, and that policies and protocols have been established for marine invasive species management, unlike the daunting challenge of mitigating 

climate change. Ocean warming compounds the problem of marine invasive species by opening new routes for invasions, such as the Northwest Passage 

which has been ice-free since 2007, and by favoring the colonization, survival, and growth of some invasive species over native species. Marine ecosystems 

should respond more easily to a rapidly warming ocean if they are protected from invasive species and other disturbances that can be effectively managed. 

See more of: Invasive Species: What Harm Do They Do?

See more of: Land and Oceans

See more of: Symposia 

<< Previous Presentation | Next Presentation >> 

Abstract: From Sea to Sea: Effects of Invasive Species in Marine Systems (2011 AAAS Annual Meeting (17-21 February 2011)) Page 1 of 1

http://aaas.confex.com/aaas/2011/webprogram/Paper2695.html 11/22/2011
Exihibit 31.1


                       CERTIFICATIONS


I, Robert L. Smith and John Ballard certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of
Tabatha III, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this annual report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for
the registrant and have:

   a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
is being prepared;

   b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

   c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

   a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

   b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

6. I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date:August 13, 2003
                                                       /s/ ROBERT L. SMITH
                                                           Robert L. Smith
                                                   Chief Executive Officer

                                                      /s/ JOHN BALLARD
                                                           John Ballard
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
§ 971.801 Records to be maintained and information to be submitted by licensees and permittees. ( a ) ( 1 ) In addition to the information specified elsewhere in the part and in 15 CFR part 970, each licensee and permittee must keep such records, consistent with standard accounting principles, as specified by the Administrator in the license or permit. Such records shall include information which will fully disclose expenditures for exploration for, or commercial recovery of hard mineral resources in the area under license or permit, and any other information which will facilitate an effective audit of these expenditures.
( 2 ) The Administrator and the Comptroller General of the United States, or any of their duly authorized representatives, shall have access, for purposes of audit and examination to any books, documents, papers, and records of licensees and permittees which are necessary and directly pertinent to verification of the expenditures referred to in paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( b ) In addition to the information specified elsewhere in this part and in 15 CFR part 970, each applicant, licensee or permittee will be required to submit to the Administrator, upon request, data or other information the Administrator may reasonably need for purposes of: ( 1 ) Making determinations with respect to the issuance, revocation, modification, or suspension of the license or permit in question;
( 2 ) Evaluating the effectiveness of license or permit TCRs;
( 3 ) Compliance with the biennial Congressional report requirement contained in section 309 of the Act; and
( 4 ) Evaluation of the exploration or commercial recovery activities conducted by the licensee or permittee.
At a minimum, licensees and permittees shall submit an annual written report within 90 days after each anniversary of the license or permit issuance or transfer, discussing exploration or commercial recovery activities and expenditures. The report shall address diligence requirements (see § 971.503 and 15 CFR 970.602), implementation of any approved monitoring plan (see § 971.602 and 15 CFR 970.522(c) and 970.702(a)), and applicable changes which do not constitute revisions (see § 971.413(e) and 15 CFR 970.513(c)). Permittees must also report the tonnage of nodules recovered (§ 971.426) and discuss manganese conservation measures (see § 971.502).
§ 970.516 Approval of license transfers. ( a ) The Administrator may transfer a license after a written request by the licensee. After a licensee submits such a request to the Administrator, the proposed transferee will be deemed an applicant for an exploration license, and will be subject to the requirements and procedures of this part.
( b ) The Administrator will transfer a license if the proposed transferee and exploration activities meet the requirements of the Act and this part, and if the proposed transfer is in the public interest. The Administrator will presume that the transfer is in the public interest if it meets the requirements of the Act and this part. In case of mere change in the form or ownership of a licensee, the Administrator may waive relevant determinations for requirements for which no changes have occurred since the preceding application.
### SUBCHAPTER XII—SAFETY OF PUBLIC WATER SYSTEMS
### §8303. Restricted gifts

Disbursements from the General Post Fund shall be made on orders by and within the discretion of the Secretary and in the manner prescribed in section 8523 of this title; except that (1) if the testator or donor has directed or shall direct that the devise, bequest, or gift be devoted to a particular use authorized by this chapter, the same, less expenses incurred, or the net proceeds thereof, shall be used or disbursed as directed, except that a precatory direction shall be fulfilled only insofar as may be proper or practicable; and (2) if the testator or donor shall have indicated the desire that the devise, bequest, or gift shall be for the benefit of persons in hospitals or homes, or other institutions operated by the United States but under the jurisdiction of an official other than the Secretary, the same, less expenses incurred, or the net proceeds thereof which may come into possession of the Secretary, shall be disbursed by transfer to the governing authorities of such institution, or otherwise, in such manner as the Secretary may determine, for the benefit of the persons in the institution indicated by the testator or donor, for proper purposes, as nearly as practicable in conformity with such desire of the testator or donor.

(Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1255, §5103; Pub. L. 99–576, title VII, §701(91), Oct. 28, 1986, 100 Stat. 3299; renumbered §8303 and amended Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §402(b)(1), (d)(1), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 238, 239; Pub. L. 102–83, §4(b)(1), (2)(E), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 404, 405.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–40, §402(b)(1), renumbered section 5103 of this title as this section.

Pub. L. 102–83 substituted "Secretary" for "Administrator" wherever appearing.

Pub. L. 102–40, §402(d)(1), substituted "8523" for "5223".

1986—Pub. L. 99–576 substituted "the" for "his" in three places.
#### § 1.64 Condemnation proceedings.

In those cases arising under the Wool Products Labeling Act of 1939 and Fur Products Labeling Act, and where it appears to the Commission that the public interest requires such action, the Commission will apply to the courts for condemnation, pursuant to the authority granted in such Acts.

[32 FR 8444, June 13, 1967, as amended at 41 FR 4814, Feb. 2, 1976]
### Part D—Emergency Powers
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 08-2484

___________ Capital Promotions, L.L.C., * * Plaintiff - Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. Don King, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Defendant - Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: January 14, 2009 Filed: January 26, 2009

___________ Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Capital Promotions, L.L.C., commenced this diversity action in the United States District Court for the Southern Di strict of Iowa, alleging that boxing promoter Don King tortiously interfered with Capital’ s exclusive contractual relationship with boxer Tyeson Fields. King moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Conceding that King is a Florida resident without assets, agents, property, or physical presence in Iowa, Capital argued that personal jurisdiction is proper because King made phone calls to Capital’s officials in Iowa, and because Capital, an Iowa corporation, bore the brunt of the harm caused by King’s tortious conduct.1 The HONORABLE ROBERT W. PRATT, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. -2- The district court 1 granted the motion to dismiss, concluding in a thorough opinion that King lacked minimum contacts with Iowa sufficient under Iowa law and the Due Process Clause to subject him to th e personal jurisdiction of an Iowa court. Capital appeals. After careful review of the record, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s order dated June 6, 2008. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________