alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1034.170 Compliance procedures. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, this section applies to all allegations of discrimination on the basis of handicap in programs or activities conducted by the agency.
( b ) The agency shall process complaints alleging violations of section 504 with respect to employment according to the procedures established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1613 pursuant to section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791).
( c ) The Office of Equal Employment Opportunity and Minority Enterprise shall be responsible for coordinating implementation of this section. Complaints may be sent to the Director, Office of Equal Employment Opportunity and Minority Enterprise, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Washington, D.C. 20207.
( d ) The agency shall accept and investigate all complete complaints for which it has jurisdiction. All complete complaints must be filed within 180 days of the alleged act of discrimination. The agency may extend this time period for good cause.
( e ) If the agency receives a complaint over which it does not have jurisdiction, it shall promptly notify the complainant and shall make reasonable efforts to refer the complaint to the appropriate government entity.
( f ) The agency shall notify the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board upon receipt of any complaint alleging that a building or facility that is subject to the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4151-4157), or section 502 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. 792), is not readily accessible to and usable by handicapped persons.
( g ) Within 180 days of the receipt of a complete complaint for which it has jurisdiction, the agency shall notify the complainant of the results of the investigation in a letter containing— ( 1 ) Findings of fact and conclusions of law;
( 2 ) A description of a remedy for each violation found; and
( 3 ) A notice of the right to appeal.
( h ) Appeals of the findings of fact and conclusions of law or remedies must be filed by the complainant within 90 days of receipt from the agency of the letter required by § 1034.170(g). The agency may extend this time for good cause.
( i ) Timely appeals shall be accepted and processed by the head of the agency.
( j ) The head of the agency shall notify the complainant of the results of the appeal within 60 days of the receipt of the request. If the head of the agency determines that additional information is needed from the complainant, he or she shall have 60 days from the date of receipt of the additional information to make his or her determination on the appeal.
( k ) The time limits cited in paragraphs (g) and (j) of this section may be extended with the permission of the Assistant Attorney General.
( l ) The agency may delegate its authority for conducting complaint investigations to other Federal agencies, except that the authority for making the final determination may not be delegated to another agency.
[51 FR 4575, 4579, Feb. 5, 1986, as amended at 51 FR 4575, Feb. 5, 1986]
§ 700.21 Application for priority rating authority. ( a ) For projects believed to maximize domestic energy supplies, a person may request priority rating authority for scarce, critical, and essential supplies of materials, equipment, and services (related to the production of materials or equipment, or the installation, repair, or maintenance of equipment) by submitting a request to the Department of Energy. Further information may be obtained from the Department of Energy, Office of Cybersecurity, Energy Security, and Emergency Response, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585; Telephone: (202) 586-8100; Email: *askcr@hq.doe.gov .*
( b ) If the Department of Energy notifies the Department of Commerce that the project maximizes domestic energy supplies and that the materials, equipment, or services are critical and essential, the Department of Commerce will determine whether the items in question are scarce, and, if they are scarce, whether there is a need to use the priorities authority. ( 1 ) Scarcity implies an unusual difficulty in obtaining the materials, equipment, or services in a time frame consistent with the timely completion of the energy project. In determining scarcity, the Department of Commerce may consider factors such as the following: ( i ) Value and volume of material or equipment shipments;
( ii ) Consumption of material and equipment;
( iii ) Volume and market trends of imports and exports;
( iv ) Domestic and foreign sources of supply;
( v ) Normal levels of inventories;
( vi ) Rates of capacity utilization;
( vii ) Volume of new orders; and
( viii ) Lead times for new orders.
( 2 ) In finding whether there is a need to use the priorities authority, the Department of Commerce may consider alternative supply solutions and other measures.
( c ) After the Department of Commerce has conducted its analysis, it will advise the Department of Energy whether the two findings have been satisfied. If the findings are satisfied, the Department of Commerce will authorize the Department of Energy to grant the use of a priority rating to the applicant.
( d ) Schedule I to this part includes a list of approved programs to support the maximization of domestic energy supplies. A Department of Energy regulation setting forth the procedures and criteria used by the Department of Energy in making its determination and findings is published in 10 CFR part 216.
[79 FR 47567, Aug. 14, 2014, as amended at 89 FR 58972, July 22, 2024]
#### Giuseppe Sciaballa, Suing, etc., v. Illinois Surety Company.

Motion granted; questions to be settled on settlement of order. Order to be settled on notice. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Board Coverage Decision

2010-4

The Newburgh & South Shore Railroad, LLC

Name Change - Effective May 9, 1998

Newburgh & South Shore Railroad Ltd

has changed its name to

Newburgh & Southshore Railroad, LLC.

No Decision Published

BA # 3268
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of EMPS Research Corporation,
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Louis Naegle, Principal Executive Officer and Jennifer Preece,
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



Date: May 14, 2004                                   /s/ Louis Naegle
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Louis Naegle,
                                                     Principal Executive Officer



Date: May 14, 2004                                   /s/ Jennifer Preece
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Jennifer Preece,
                                                     Principal Financial Officer
§ 837.502 Reinstatement of annuity. ( a ) *When appropriate.* ( 1 ) When an annuity was terminated because of reemployment under the provisions of § 837.202 of this part, or any similar provision of statute or regulation in effect prior to the promulgation of this part, the annuity that was terminated will be reinstated effective the date immediately following the date the reemployed annuitant separated from reemployment, if— ( i ) The reemployed annuitant's right to annuity has not been terminated under any other provision of regulation or statute; and
( ii ) The reemployed annuitant is not entitled to either an immediate or deferred CSRS or FERS annuity based on the separation from reemployment.
( 2 ) When an annuity was suspended because of reemployment under the provisions of § 837.203 of this part, the annuity that was suspended will be reinstated effective the date immediately following the date the reemployed annuitant separated from reemployment.
( b ) *Amount of reinstated annuity.* The amount of an annuity reinstated under the provisions of paragraph (a)(2) of this section will be the amount of the annuity at the effective date of termination, adjusted by such adjustments as would have occurred had the annuity remained payable during the period of reemployment.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

January 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129371 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 129371 

 COA: 255634 

Kent CC: 03-007933-FC 

HOWARD LATRELL DUBOIS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 12, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0123 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 30, 2006 

Clerk
§ 1101.25 Notice of intent to disclose. ( a ) *Notice to manufacturer or private labeler.* In accordance with section 6(b)(2) of the CPSA, if the Commission, after following the notice provisions of section 6(b)(1), determines that information claimed to be inaccurate by a manufacturer or private labeler in comments submitted under section 6(b)(1) should be disclosed because the Commission believes it has complied with section 6(b)(1), the Commission shall notify the manufacturer or private labeler that it intends to disclose the information not less than 5 days after the date of the receipt of notification by the firm. The notice of intent to disclose will include an explanation of the reason for the Commission's decision, copies of any additional materials, such as explanatory statements and letters to Freedom of Information Act requesters, which were not previously sent to the firm.
( b ) *Commission finding a lesser period is required.* The Commission may determine that the public health and safety requires less than 5 days advance notice of its intent to disclose information claimed to be inaccurate. For example, the Commission may determine it is necessary to warn the public quickly because individuals may be in danger from a product hazard or a potential hazard, or to correct product safety information released by third persons, which mischaracterized statements made by the Commission about the product or which attributes to the Commission statements about the product which the Commission did not make.
( c ) *Notice of findings.* The Commission will inform a manufacturer or private labeler of a product which is the subject of a public health and safety finding that the public health and safety requires less than 5 days advance notice either orally or in writing, depending on the immediacy of the need for quick action.
[48 FR 57430, Dec. 29, 1983, as amended at 73 FR 72335, Nov. 28, 2008]
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,                and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of                Registrant. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                                       |                             |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                       | /s/                Patrick Smyth |
|   | Name:                    Patrick SmythTitle:                    Chief Executive                    Officer |

----
#### § 1.99 Submission of rules, guides, interpretations, and policy statements to Congress and the Comptroller General.

Whenever the Commission issues or substantively amends a rule or industry guide or formally adopts an interpretation or policy statement that constitutes a “rule” within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 804(3), a copy of the final rule, guide, interpretation or statement, together with a concise description, the proposed effective date, and a statement of whether the rule, guide, interpretation or statement is a “major rule” within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 804(2), will be transmitted to each House of Congress and to the Comptroller General. The material transmitted to the Comptroller General will also include any additional relevant information required by 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(B). This provision generally applies to rules issued or substantively amended pursuant to § 1.14(c), § 1.15(a), § 1.19, or § 1.26(d); industry guides issued pursuant to § 1.6; interpretations and policy statements formally adopted by the Commission; and any rule of agency organization, practice or procedure that substantially affects the rights or obligations of non-agency parties.

[63 FR 36340, July 8, 1998]
#### § 1025.61 Who may make appearances.

A party or participant may appear in person, or by a duly authorized officer, partner, regular employee, or other agent of the party or participant, or by counsel or other duly qualified representative, in accordance with § 1025.65.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 25 (Friday, February 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 5864]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2605]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-52,760]


Fishing Vessel Freedom (F/V) Freedom Mt. Vernon, WA; Dismissal of 
Application for Reconsideration

    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative 
reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance for workers at Fishing Vessel (F/V) Freedom, Mt. 
Vernon, Washington. The application contained no new substantial 
information which would bear importantly on the Department's 
determination. Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued.

TA-W-52,760; Fishing Vessel F/V) Freedom Mt. Vernon, Washington 
(January 14, 2004)


    Signed at Washington, DC this 27th day of January 2004.
Timothy Sullivan,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-2605 Filed 2-5-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
#### § 850.401 Electronic notice of coverage determination.

An agency or other entity that submits electronic employee records directly or through a Shared Service Center must include in the notice of law enforcement officer, firefighter, or nuclear materials retirement coverage, required by §§ 831.811(a), 831.911(a), 842.808(a), or 842.910(a) of this chapter, the position description number, or other unique alphanumeric identifier, in the notice for the position for which law enforcement officer, firefighter, or nuclear materials courier retirement coverage has been approved. Agencies or other entities must submit position descriptions to OPM in a PDF document to combox address: *combox@opm.gov.*

[78 FR 68983, Nov. 18, 2013]
NRC CONTINUES TO MONITOR HURRICANE SANDY; NO PLANTS SHUT DOWN 

AS A RESULT OF THE STORM

 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is continuing to monitor impacts from 

Hurricane Sandy on nuclear power plants in the Northeastern United States. As of 3 p.m. EDT 

Monday, no plants have had to shut down as a result of the storm although some plants, 

including Oyster Creek and Salem Unit 2, were already out of service for regularly scheduled 

refueling and maintenance outages. All plants remain in a safe condition, with emergency 

equipment available if needed and NRC inspectors on-site.

 “Given the breadth and intensity of this historic storm, the NRC is keeping a close watch 

on all of the nuclear power plants that could be impacted,” NRC Chairman Allison Macfarlane 

said. “Our extra inspectors sent to the potentially affected sites will continue, on an around-theclock basis, to independently verify that the safety of these plants is maintained until the storm 

has passed and afterwards.”

 The NRC has dispatched inspectors to all of the plants that could experience effects of 

the storm. These include: Oyster Creek, in Lacey Township, N.J.; Salem and Hope Creek, in 

Hancocks Bridge, N.J.; Calvert Cliffs, in Lusby, Md.; Limerick, in Limerick Township, Pa.; 

Peach Bottom, in Delta, Pa.; Three Mile Island, in Middletown, Pa.; Susquehanna, in Salem 

Township, Pa.; Indian Point, in Buchanan, N.Y.; and Millstone, in Waterford, Conn. Those 

inspectors, working with the NRC inspectors on-site on a daily basis, will independently verify 

that operators are following relevant procedures to ensure plant safety before, during and after 

the storm.

 In addition, the NRC is monitoring the storm from its emergency response centers.

 Nuclear power plant procedures require that the facilities shut down under certain severe

weather conditions. The plants’ emergency diesel generators are available if off-site power is 

lost during the storm. Also, all plants have flood protection above the predicted storm surge, and 

key components and systems are housed in watertight buildings capable of withstanding 

hurricane-force winds and flooding.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region I 

2100 Renaissance Blvd., King of Prussia, Pa. 19406-2713

E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov 

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. I-12-041

Contact: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330

 Neil Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

Oct. 29, 2012 4 p.m.

Email: opa1.resource@nrc.gov
The NRC will continue to track Hurricane Sandy using the resources of all federal 

agencies and several weather forecasting services. The agency will also continue to 

communicate on storm-related developments with other federal and state agencies.

 ###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES link on the 

NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's 

website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.
§ 1028.110 Expedited review procedures for certain kinds of research involving no more than minimal risk, and for minor changes in approved research. ( a ) The Secretary of HHS has established, and published as a Notice in the Federal Register, a list of categories of research that may be reviewed by the IRB through an expedited review procedure. The Secretary will evaluate the list at least every 8 years and amend it, as appropriate, after consultation with other Federal departments and agencies and after publication in the Federal Register for public comment. A copy of the list is available from the Office for Human Research Protections, HHS, or any successor office.
( b ) ( 1 ) An IRB may use the expedited review procedure to review the following: ( i ) Some or all of the research appearing on the list described in paragraph (a) of this section, unless the reviewer determines that the study involves more than minimal risk;
( ii ) Minor changes in previously approved research during the period for which approval is authorized; or
( iii ) Research for which limited IRB review is a condition of exemption under § 1028.104(d)(2)(iii), (d)(3)(i)(C), and (d)(7) and (8).
( 2 ) Under an expedited review procedure, the review may be carried out by the IRB chairperson or by one or more experienced reviewers designated by the chairperson from among members of the IRB. In reviewing the research, the reviewers may exercise all of the authorities of the IRB except that the reviewers may not disapprove the research. A research activity may be disapproved only after review in accordance with the nonexpedited procedure set forth in § 1028.108(b).
( c ) Each IRB that uses an expedited review procedure shall adopt a method for keeping all members advised of research proposals that have been approved under the procedure.
( d ) The department or agency head may restrict, suspend, terminate, or choose not to authorize an institution's or IRB's use of the expedited review procedure.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                             CERTIFICATION OF CEO
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Madison River Capital,
LLC (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), J.
Stephen Vanderwoude, as Managing Director, Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ J. Stephen Vanderwoude
----------------------------------------

Name:   J. Stephen Vanderwoude
Title:  Managing Director, Chairman
        and Chief Executive Officer
Date:   March 30, 2004




This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Andrew J. McKenna restricted stock unit awards



 Exhibit 10(q) 
 DESCRIPTION OF RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS GRANTED TO ANDREW J. MCKENNA 
 Upon the recommendation of the Governance
Committee of the Board of Directors (“Board”) of McDonald’s Corporation (the “Company”), the Board awarded Andrew J. McKenna a grant of 17,000 restricted stock units (“RSU”) on May 23, 2007 in recognition of
his responsibilities as non-executive Chairman. Each RSU represents the right to receive, when the RSU vests, one share of the Company’s common stock or, at the Company’s discretion, cash equal to the fair market value thereof. The RSUs
will vest on the later of (i) one year from the date of grant and (ii) Mr. McKenna’s retirement from the Board. The RSUs will immediately vest upon Mr. McKenna’s death or if his service on the Board terminates because
he becomes disabled. As disclosed on Forms 8-K filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission on May 16, 2005 and May 31, 2006, Mr. McKenna received grants of 10,000 and 15,000 RSUs, respectively, on the same terms as
described herein.