alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15
- 7139

JOSEPH GRIFFITH , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. ( 3:14

- cv
- 00047

- REP

- RCY )

Submitted : May 11, 2017 Decided: May 30, 2017

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Joseph Griffith, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher John Catizone, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Joseph Griffith appeals the district cou rt’s order accep ting the magistrate judge ’s report and recommendation and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition for lack of jurisdiction . On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s
brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Be cause Griffith ’ s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Griffith has forfeited appellate review of the
court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc. , 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Moreover, the distric t court correctly concluded that Griffith’s challenge was not properly brought in a § 2241 petition. See In re Jones , 226 F.3d 328, 333

- 34 (4th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, we grant Griffith’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the
district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
#### § 700.75 Compliance conflicts.

If compliance with any provision of the Defense Production Act, the Selective Service Act and related statutes, this regulation, or an official action would prevent a person from filling a rated order or from complying with another provision of the Defense Production Act, this regulation, or an official action, the person must immediately notify the Department of Commerce for resolution of the conflict.

[49 FR 30414, July 30, 1984. Redesignated at 54 FR 601, Jan. 9, 1989, as amended at 63 FR 31924, June 11, 1998]
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

****

In connection
with the Annual Report of Worldwide Manufacturing USA, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB
for the period ending December 31, 2003, (the "Report"), I, John D. Ballard, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1)	The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial
position and results of operations.

March 30, 2004

/s/ John D. BallardChief Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer
### Part B—Financial Assistance to Community Action Programs and Related Activities
CERTIFICATIONS
      OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERS PURSUANT TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT




Exhibit
      32






**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of American Energy Production, Inc., a
      Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ended December
      31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),
      Charles Bitters, Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer of the
      Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to their knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Charles BittersCharles
                BittersPrincipal
                Executive and Financial OfficerMarch
                30, 2007







[A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      American Energy Production, Inc. and will be retained by American Energy
      Production, Inc. and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
      request.]
NRC HOLDING PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS THE 

WESTINGHOUSE HEMATITE DECOMMISSIONING PLAN

The NRC has scheduled a public meeting to discuss the pending issuance of amendments 

to the Hematite license (NRC License No. SNM-00033), including approval of the site’s 

decommissioning plan and the Hematite soil alternate disposal requests. NRC staff will be 

present to discuss the results of its review of the decommissioning plan and answer questions 

from the public. 

The meeting will be held Tuesday, July 12, in the atrium of the Best Western Shalimar 

Conference Center, 1200 Gannon Drive, in Festus, Mo., from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. 

The Hematite plant, near Festus, operated as a nuclear fuel fabrication facility from 1954 

until 2001. In 2009, Westinghouse submitted its current decommissioning plan for the facility, a 

decommissioning funding plan, and a physical security and nuclear material control plan. When 

approved, all these documents will be incorporated into the Westinghouse license as license 

amendments.

Further information on the meeting can be found at the NRC Public Meeting Schedule 

website http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/public-meetings/index.cfm or contact T.R. Rowe of 

the NRC at 1-800-368-5642, extension 8008.

###

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC 

meeting should contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand.

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web 

address: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at 

www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when 

news releases are posted to NRC’s website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-122 July 1, 2011
§ 27.107 IRB membership. ( a ) Each IRB shall have at least five members, with varying backgrounds to promote complete and adequate review of research activities commonly conducted by the institution. The IRB shall be sufficiently qualified through the experience and expertise of its members (professional competence), and the diversity of its members, including race, gender, and cultural backgrounds and sensitivity to such issues as community attitudes, to promote respect for its advice and counsel in safeguarding the rights and welfare of human subjects. The IRB shall be able to ascertain the acceptability of proposed research in terms of institutional commitments (including policies and resources) and regulations, applicable law, and standards of professional conduct and practice. The IRB shall therefore include persons knowledgeable in these areas. If an IRB regularly reviews research that involves a category of subjects that is vulnerable to coercion or undue influence, such as children, prisoners, individuals with impaired decision-making capacity, or economically or educationally disadvantaged persons, consideration shall be given to the inclusion of one or more individuals who are knowledgeable about and experienced in working with these categories of subjects.
( b ) Each IRB shall include at least one member whose primary concerns are in scientific areas and at least one member whose primary concerns are in nonscientific areas.
( c ) Each IRB shall include at least one member who is not otherwise affiliated with the institution and who is not part of the immediate family of a person who is affiliated with the institution.
( d ) No IRB may have a member participate in the IRB's initial or continuing review of any project in which the member has a conflicting interest, except to provide information requested by the IRB.
( e ) An IRB may, in its discretion, invite individuals with competence in special areas to assist in the review of issues that require expertise beyond or in addition to that available on the IRB. These individuals may not vote with the IRB.
### SUBCHAPTER II—POINTS OF LIGHT FOUNDATION
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. §1350

I, David H. Fleischman, Chief Financial Officer of TradeStation Group, Inc., hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K of TradeStation Group, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TradeStation Group, Inc.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.



|               |  |                                        
|-------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|March 12, 2010 |  | /s/ David H. Fleischman                
|Date           |  | David H. Fleischman                    
|               |  | Chief Financial Officer,               
|               |  | Vice President of Finance and Treasurer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - [Report No. 2680]

Petitions for Reconsideration have been filed in the Commission's Rulemaking proceedings listed in this Public Notice and published pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e). The full text of this document is available for viewing and copying in Room CY-B402, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC, or may be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI) (1-800-378-3160). Oppositions to these petitions must be filed by December 6, 2004. See section 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions have expired.

*Subject:*                     In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism (CC Docket No. 02-6).                

*Number of Petitions Filed:*                     1.                

*Subject:*                     In the Matter of Modification of Parts 2 and 15 of the Commission's Rules for unlicensed devices and equipment approval (ET Docket No. 03-201).                

*Number of Petitions Filed:*                     1.                

*Subject:*                     In the Matter of Rules and Regulations Implementing the                           ( print page 67737)                        Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act of 2003 (CG Docket No. 04-53).                

*Number of Petitions Filed:*                     1.                

Marlene H. Dortch,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 04-25743 Filed 11-18-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
NO. 03-14-00595-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE

AUSTIN SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT

ANDREW ELON GARRAWAY,

Appellant

VS.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

APPEAL FROM

THE 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

HAYS COUNTY, TEXAS

TRIAL COURT CAUSE NO. CR-11-0925

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNTIMELY STATE'S BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE THIRD COURT OF

APPEALS:

State files this Motion for Leave to File an Untimely Brief, and in

support states:

1. The State's Briefwas due on March 19, 2015.

ACCEPTED

03-14-00595-CR

4634374

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

3/25/2015 11:14:14 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/25/2015 11:14:14 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
2. The time to file the State's brief has expired. The undersigned

attorney was preparing for jury trial and due to a heavy case load, the brief

has taken longer than expected to finalize.

3. This Motion is not sought for delay but so that justice may be

done.

4. For the foregoing reasons, the State seeks leave to file this brief

late pursuant to Texas Rules ofAppellate Procedure, Rule 38.6.

Respectfully submitted.

Ben Moore

Assistant Criminal District Attorney

Hays County, Texas

Hays County Government Center

712 South Stagecoach Trail, Ste. 2057

San Marcos, Texas 78666

benjamin.moore@co.hays.tx.us

(512)393-7600

(512) 393-2246 fax

State Bar No. 24042522

Counselfor State
CERTIFICATE

The foregoing Appellee Motion for Leave to File Untimely State's

Briefwas subscribed and sworn tobefore me byBen Moore onthis the 25^

day ofMarch, 2015.

RHONDA WIEDERSTEIN

MYCOMMISSION EXPIRES

September 9,2018

Ben Moore

Notary Public in and for the State ofTexas

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on March 25, 2015 I served the above motion by email to

Ellic Sahualla at ellic@sahuallalaw.com.

Ben Moore
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk July 24, 2012

s0716 

# Order

July 24, 2012

144968

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144968

COA: 301606

Oakland CC: 2010

- 230501

- FH

DORIAN LAMONT ROBINSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 3, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
No: 14-007 February 11, 2014

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

Embargoed Until 10:45 A.M. EST

NRC’s Strides in Post-Fukushima Efforts, Enhancing Regulation

Featured in International Atomic Energy Agency Report

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission “has acted promptly and effectively... in the interests of 

the public health and safety” following the March 2011 Fukushima nuclear accident, according to an 

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) report today. The report stems from a follow-up visit 

from the IAEA’s Integrated Regulatory Review Service (IRRS), which assesses a country’s regulatory 

infrastructure against international safety standards and good practices.

“We greatly appreciate the team’s findings that the NRC’s post-Fukushima actions are 

appropriately addressing the lessons we’ve learned,” said NRC Chairman Allison M. Macfarlane. “I’m 

pleased to see not only that our 2011 Near-Term Task Force report is internationally respected, but that

our inspection activities are also highlighted as being ‘exemplary.’”

The weeklong visit of eight nuclear regulators and support staff from European countries 

examined the NRC’s response to recommendations and suggestions from a full IRRS mission in 2010. 

The team’s examination of the agency’s response to Fukushima concluded the NRC acted in a timely 

manner and properly implemented short-term actions. The team also discussed the agency’s 

commitment to action in the long term, as well as the significant effort that remains for fully 

incorporating all the changes into NRC regulations.

The follow-up team commended the NRC for effectively addressing one of two 

recommendations and 19 of 20 suggestions from the original IRRS mission. The resolved 

recommendation involves comprehensively mapping the NRC’s various processes in order to develop a 

more integrated management approach. The NRC continues to address the remaining recommendation 

and suggestion, and will address the team’s new suggestion on consolidating rules and guidance for 

plants permanently ceasing operation and moving to decommissioning.

The follow-up team’s report will be available on the NRC website. The 2010 IRRS mission

focused on technical and policy issues regarding the agency’s oversight of operating U.S. nuclear 

power plants. The IRRS program provides independent peer review of a country’s nuclear regulator by 

interviewing staff, examining documents and observing inspection activities. The IAEA has conducted 

51 full or follow-up IRRS missions in countries that include Australia, Canada, France, Japan, Mexico, 

Russia and the United Kingdom.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE
              -----------------------------------------------------

                   CHASE CREDIT CARD OWNER TRUST SERIES 2000-2

             ------------------------------------------------------



         The undersigned, an Authorized Officer of the Chase Manhattan Bank USA,
National Association, as Administrator pursuant to the Indenture for the Chase
Credit Card Owner Trust Series 2000-2 does hereby certify that:

                  1. The undersigned is an Authorized Officer pursuant to the
                  Indenture to execute and deliver this Certificate to the
                  Indenture Trustee.

                  2. This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 3.9 of
                  the Indenture.

                  3. A review of the activities of the Issuer for the calendar
                  year ended December 31, 2001, and of performance under this
                  Indenture has been made under the supervision of the
                  undersigned.

                  4. To the best of the undersigned knowledge, based on such
                  review, the Issuer has complied with all conditions and
                  covenants in all material respects under this Indenture for
                  the calendar year ended December 31, 2001. No default in the
                  compliance of any such condition or covenant has occurred or
                  is continuing except as set forth in paragraph 5 below.

                  5. The following is a description of each default in the
                  performance of the Issuer's obligations under the provisions
                  of the Indenture known to the undersigned to have been made
                  during such period which sets forth in detail (i) the nature
                  of each such default, (ii) the action taken by the Issuer, if
                  any, to remedy each such default and (iii) the current status
                  of each such default: NONE.


                                                 (signatures on following page)

<PAGE>

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate this 25th
day of March, 2002.

                                      By CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, National
                                      Association, as Administrator




                                      By:    /s/ Patricia M. Garvey
                                             -------------------------
                                      Name:  Patricia M. Garvey
                                      Title: Vice President
**EXHIBIT 23**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmWe consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos.333-52516, 333-97102, 333-81836, 333-69284, 333-66258, and 333-114262; Form S-3 Nos. 333-87082 and333-83820), as amended, and in the related Prospectus of Stratos International, Inc. of our reportdated June 16, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of StratosInternational, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended April 30, 2005./s/ Ernst & Young LLPChicago, Illinois
### §6715. Coordination with District of Columbia

(a) Local Needs, Initiative, and Participation.—In carrying out the purposes of this subchapter and the Pennsylvania Avenue Development Corporation Act of 1972 (Public Law 92–578, 86 Stat. 1266), the Administrator of General Services shall—

(1) consult and cooperate with District of Columbia officials and community leaders at the earliest practicable time;

(2) give primary consideration to local needs and desires and to local and regional goals and policies as expressed in urban renewal, community renewal, and comprehensive land use plans and regional plans; and

(3) foster local initiative and participation in connection with the planning and development of projects.

(b) Compliance With Local Requirements.—To the extent the Administrator constructs, rehabilitates, alters, or improves any project under this subchapter, the Administrator shall comply with all District of Columbia laws, ordinances, codes, and regulations. Section 8722(d) of this title applies to all construction, rehabilitation, alteration, and improvement of all buildings by the Administrator under this subchapter. Construction, rehabilitation, alteration, and improvement of any project by non-Federal Government sources is subject to the District of Columbia Official Code and zoning regulations.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1198.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6715 | 40:878. | Pub. L. 92–578, §9, Oct. 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1273. |

Section

In subsection (b), the word "reconstructing" is omitted as unnecessary.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Pennsylvania Avenue Development Corporation Act of 1972, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 92–578, Oct. 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1266, which was classified to chapter 19 (§871 et seq.) of former Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, prior to repeal and reenactment as section 6701 of this title and this subchapter by Pub. L. 107–217, §§1, 6(b), Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062, 1304. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.
#### § 791.104 First interagency consultation.

Upon finding that an ICTS Transaction likely meets the criteria set forth in § 791.103(c) during the initial review under § 791.103, the Secretary shall notify the appropriate agency heads and, in consultation with them, shall determine whether the ICTS Transaction meets the criteria set forth in § 791.103(c).

[86 FR 4923, Jan. 19, 2021. Redesignated and amended at 89 FR 58265, July 18, 2024]