alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc. 04-24999) published on pages 65195 and 65196 of the issue for Wednesday, November 10, 2004.

Under the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis heading, the entry for Charles Keith Akin, is revised to read as follows:

**A.  Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis**                     (Randall C. Sumner, Vice President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:                

*1.  Charles Keith Akin*, Clinton, Kentucky; and the Akin Control Group, which consists of Charles Keith Akin; Anita Akin; Burkley Investments, Inc.; Parkway Manor - KY; and Parkway Manor - TN,  all of Clinton, Kentucky; and Bruce Akin, Paducah, Kentucky; to acquire additional voting shares of Purchase Area Bancorp, Bardwell, Kentucky, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Bardwell Deposit Bank, Bardwell, Kentucky.                

Comments on this application must be received by November 24, 2004.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 10, 2004.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 04-25455 Filed 11-16-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
§ 1019.33 Statement of policy and interpretation. ( a ) In its enforcement of the Consumer Product Safety Act, the Commission interprets the provisions of that Act to prohibit the export of products which fail to comply with an applicable consumer product safety standard or banning rule issued under that Act if those products have at any time been distributed in commerce for use in the United States.
( b ) In its enforcement of the Federal Hazardous Substances Act, the Commission interprets the provisions of the Act to prohibit the export of products which are misbranded substances or banned hazardous substances as those terms are used in that Act if those products have at any time been sold or offered for sale in domestic commerce.
OPENING REMARKS OF NRC CHAIRMAN GREGORY B. JACZKO AT THE 

INFORMATION BRIEFING ON THE FUEL CYCLE OVERSIGHT PROGRAM

Good morning. We are meeting today to hear an update on efforts to revise the fuel cycle 

oversight process. 

The staff’s goal is to develop a new oversight process that is more risk-informed, 

performance-based, transparent, and predictable, with performance measurements or metrics 

leveraging the risk insights of the integrated safety analyses. 

Such an approach would allow the agency to focus its resources on the more risksignificant activities, and would also allow the public to more easily understand the performance 

of a particular facility.

Since the last Commission briefing in April 2010, the staff has completed a comparison 

of ISAs and PRAs, developed approaches for cornerstones for fuel cycle facilities, developed a 

process to provide incentives for licensees to maintain effective corrective action programs, and 

identified conceptual types for a fuel cycle significance determination process.

There is currently a paper before the Commission on these matters, and we look forward 

to learning more today about the staff’s initiatives to revise the fuel cycle process and where they 

currently are, in order to inform the Commission’s decisions. 

We will hear from two panels today. The first panel will consist of stakeholders from the 

industry and public interest groups, and they will be followed by presentations from NRC staff in 

the Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards and Region II.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-208 November 1, 2011
NRC, FEMA SEEK PUBLIC INPUT IN UPDATING EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

GUIDANCE; MEETING SEPT. 13 IN ROCKVILLE, MD.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Federal Emergency Management Agency 

(FEMA) will meet with the public, state and local officials and other interested groups Sept. 13 in 

Rockville, Md., to discuss a proposed update to the agencies’ guidance for emergency 

preparedness plans at U.S. nuclear power plants.

Both the NRC and FEMA currently evaluate those plans using a single set of guidance, 

“Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and 

Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants.” The agencies are starting what is expected to 

be a multiyear process for revising these criteria to incorporate what’s been learned since the 

guidance was published in 1980. This is the second of two explanatory meetings before the 

process starts; many additional meetings will be held around the country as the process continues.

The meeting will run from 1 to 5 p.m. in the Commission Hearing Room at the NRC’s 

White Flint complex at 11555 Rockville Pike in Rockville. The public will have the opportunity to 

ask questions and provide comments during the meeting. Those planning to attend in person 

should pre-register online. The meeting will include both a teleconference and Web conference. 

Anyone interested in calling in or viewing the Web conference should contact Carolyn Kahler at 

301-415-0705, Shannon King at 301-415- 6234, or EmergencyPreparedness.Resource@nrc.gov

by Sept. 10 for instructions. 

###

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand.

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted 

to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 12-096 August 30, 2012
#### Benjamin Bernstein, as Receiver of the Property of Nathan Lieberman, Appellant, v. Nathan Lieberman et al., Defendants, and Isadore Fried et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Van Voorhis, JJ.
### §2803. Performance plans

(a) The Postal Service shall prepare an annual performance plan covering each program activity set forth in the Postal Service budget, which shall be included in the comprehensive statement presented under section 2401(e) of this title. Such plan shall—

(1) establish performance goals to define the level of performance to be achieved by a program activity;

(2) express such goals in an objective, quantifiable, and measurable form unless an alternative form is used under subsection (b);

(3) briefly describe the operational processes, skills and technology, and the human, capital, information, or other resources required to meet the performance goals;

(4) establish performance indicators to be used in measuring or assessing the relevant outputs, service levels, and outcomes of each program activity;

(5) provide a basis for comparing actual program results with the established performance goals; and

(6) describe the means to be used to verify and validate measured values.

(b) If the Postal Service determines that it is not feasible to express the performance goals for a particular program activity in an objective, quantifiable, and measurable form, the Postal Service may use an alternative form. Such alternative form shall—

(1) include separate descriptive statements of—

(A) a minimally effective program, and

(B) a successful program,

with sufficient precision and in such terms that would allow for an accurate, independent determination of whether the program activity's performance meets the criteria of either description; or

(2) state why it is infeasible or impractical to express a performance goal in any form for the program activity.

(c) In preparing a comprehensive and informative plan under this section, the Postal Service may aggregate, disaggregate, or consolidate program activities, except that any aggregation or consolidation may not omit or minimize the significance of any program activity constituting a major function or operation.

(d) The Postal Service may prepare a non-public annex to its plan covering program activities or parts of program activities relating to—

(1) the avoidance of interference with criminal prosecution; or

(2) matters otherwise exempt from public disclosure under section 410(c) of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 103–62, §7, Aug. 3, 1993, 107 Stat. 293; amended Pub. L. 109–435, title X, §1010(d)(2), Dec. 20, 2006, 120 Stat. 3261.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 109–435 substituted "section 2401(e)" for "section 2401(g)" in introductory provisions.
B.C.D. 00-24 JUL 1 3 2000

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Mississippi Rail Group, Incorporated (MRGI)

d/b/a Kosciusko & Southwestern Railway

This is a determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning the status

of Mississippi Rail Group, Incorporated (MRGI) d/b/a Kosciusko &

Southwestern Railway as an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act (45

U.S.C. §231 et seq.) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C.

§351 el seq.).

In Surface Transportation Board (STB) Finance Docket No. 33746, decided

February 24, 2000, MRGI filed a verified notice of exemption to lease from the

State ofMississippi approximately 21.4 miles of rail line from milepost 0.2, at

Aberdeen Junction, to milepost 21.66, at Kosciusko, in Holmes and Attala

Counties, Mississippi. According to the STB decision, MRGI would be the

operator ofthe line.

Information regarding MRGI was furnished by Mr. David E. Delatte, Sr.,

President and Chief Executive Officer of MRGI. According to Mr. Delatte,

MRGI is a privately held corporation which was incorporated on June 8,1998 

and is owned by himself, Dr. Donald Guild, and Mr. Richard Spencer.

Mr. Delatte stated that MRGI began a trackcar tourist operation on

November 7,1998. MRGI began freight operations on May 1, 2000.

Information provided by Mr. Delatte indicated that MRGI has five employees

who were first compensated on February 1, 2000. The information provided by

Mr. Delatte shows that MRGI has been involved in rehabilitation ofthe railroad

line and that tourist trackcar rides will be 5 percent ofits operations.

Information of record establishes that MRGI’s freight operations over the rail

line will be 95 percent of its operations. Mr. Delatte stated that the railroad

interchanges cars with Canadian National (BA No. 1103) - Illinois Central

Railroad (BA No. 1516) at Aberdeen Junction and delivers to customers in

McAdams, Aponaug, Kosciusko and Munson, Mississippi.

Section 1(a)(1) ofthe Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. §231(a)(1)), insofar as

relevant here, defines a covered employer as:

(i) any carrier by railroad subject to the jurisdiction ofthe

Surface Transportation Board under part A ofsubtitle IV ofTitle

49, United States Code.

The evidence of record establishes that MRGI is a rail carrier subject to the

jurisdiction of the Surface Transportation Board. Accordingly, it is determined

that Mississippi Rail Group, Incorporated d/b/a Kosciusko & Southwestern

Railway became an employer within the meaning of section l(a)(l)(i) ofthe

BA# 5576
I

-2-

Mississippi Rail Group, Inc. (MRGI)

d/b/a Kosciusko & Southwestern Railway

Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. §23l(a)(l)(i)) and the corresponding

provision of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act effective May 1, 2000,

the date on which it commenced freight railroad operations.

CherryrT. Thomas

) Q*c- .

V. M. Speakman, Jr. u
1

Workshop on Probabilistic Flood Hazard 

Assessment

Panel 1: Federal Agencies’ Interests 

and Needs in PFHA

Co-Chairs:

Nilesh Chokshi, NRC and Mark Blackburn, DOE

January 29, 2012

Rockville, MD
Panel 1 Presentations

• NRC Staff Needs in PFHA ........................Fernando Ferrante, NRC

• Probabilistic Hazard Assessment Approaches: Transferable 

Methods from Seismic hazard...................Annie Kammerer, NRC

• Reclamation Dam Safety PFHA Perspective...J.ohn England, BOR

• FERC Need for PFHA...................................David Lord, FERC

• American Nuclear Society Standards Activities to Incorporate 

Probabilistic Approaches......John Stevenson & Ray Schneider, W
Panel 1 Panelists and 

Rapporteurs

• Panelists:

- Charles Ader, NRC

- Fernando Ferrante, NRC

- Annie Kammerer, NRC

- John England, BoR

- David Lord, FERC

- Patrick Regan, FERC

- John Stevenson, ANS-2.31

- Ray Schneider, Westinghouse

• Rapporteurs

- Christopher Cook, NRC

- Marie Pohida, NRC
Panel 1 Questions for 

Discussion

• What are the roles of deterministic and probabilistic hazard analysis in 

determining a design basis and conducting a risk assessment? How should 

they complement each other?

• What is the status of PFHA? For which flood causing mechanisms PFHAs 

can be conducted? What improvements are needed for their use in a risk 

assessment?

• Given the inherent large uncertainties, how should these be dealt with?

• What are the impediments, if any, for other flood causing mechanisms to 

develop PFHA approaches? How they can be overcome?

• What are your perceptions about the utility and usefulness of a PFHA for your 

agency missions?

• Is formal expert interaction approach like SSHAC a viable approach for 

PFHA? What PFHA specific consideration should be applied?

• Given the use of PFHA in the development of Design Basis Flooding 

determination, what is, or should be, the role of Beyond Design Basis 

Flooding in design and, if required how should it be determined?
### Part E—Other Assistance

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 108–186, title I, §102, Dec. 16, 2003, 117 Stat. 2686, amended heading generally. Prior to amendment, heading read "Mortgage Credit Enhancement".
### §3632. Action of the Governors

(a) Authority To Establish Rates and Classes.—The Governors, with the concurrence of a majority of all of the Governors then holding office, shall establish rates and classes for products in the competitive category of mail in accordance with the requirements of this subchapter and regulations promulgated under section 3633.

(b) Procedures.—

(1) In general.—Rates and classes shall be established in writing, complete with a statement of explanation and justification, and the date as of which each such rate or class takes effect.

(2) Rates or classes of general applicability.—In the case of rates or classes of general applicability in the Nation as a whole or in any substantial region of the Nation, the Governors shall cause each rate and class decision under this section and the record of the Governors' proceedings in connection with such decision to be published in the Federal Register at least 30 days before the effective date of any new rates or classes.

(3) Rates or classes not of general applicability.—In the case of rates or classes not of general applicability in the Nation as a whole or in any substantial region of the Nation, the Governors shall cause each rate and class decision under this section and the record of the proceedings in connection with such decision to be filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission by such date before the effective date of any new rates or classes as the Governors consider appropriate, but in no case less than 15 days.

(4) Criteria.—As part of the regulations required under section 3633, the Postal Regulatory Commission shall establish criteria for determining when a rate or class established under this subchapter is or is not of general applicability in the Nation as a whole or in any substantial region of the Nation.

(c) Transition Rule.—Until regulations under section 3633 first take effect, rates and classes for competitive products shall remain subject to modification in accordance with the provisions of this chapter and section 407, as such provisions were as last in effect before the date of enactment of this section.

(Added Pub. L. 109–435, title II, §202, Dec. 20, 2006, 120 Stat. 3206.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of enactment of this section, referred to in subsec. (c), is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 109–435, which was approved Dec. 20, 2006.
Cc:

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Attachments:

,. . '.{ iii:ENT OF

Faulk, Scott (OSJ)""DT.IT''''''

- ~:;fZETOPERAtIO,~~ . Faulk,Scott (OSn

lJI4 MAY 2 Wednesday, May 28,201412:30 PM .. .

q A <f. !8~ckley';'BeckleyAirport Manager'; 'Clarksburg'; 'Greenbrier'; 'Greenbrier Airport

Manager'; 'Mayor of Morgantown'; 'Morgantown'; 'Morgantown 2'; 'Morgantown 3';

'Staunton'; 'Staunton 2'; 'Staunton 3'; 'Staunton 4'; 'Staunton 5'; 'Staunton 6'; 'Staunton

7'; 'Staunton Airport Manager'; jmarhefka@cityofmorgantown.org'

Shawn Simpson <shawn@boutiqueair.com> (shawn@boutiqueair.com); 'Dave Hackett';

'Joshua Garth Newsteder'; Jamie Kogutek (Jamie.Kogutek@silverairways.com); Gormas,

Michael (OSn; Martin, Michael (OSn; Schlemmer, Kevin(OSn

Revised EASProposals for Your Review

Boutique Air.pdt; CityLinkAirat Beckley and Jamestown.pdf; CityLinkAirat

Clarksburg.pdf; CityLinkAirEASat Greenbrier.pdf; CityLinkAirEASat Morgantown.pdf;

Silver.pdf; SunAirProposal.pdf.

Greetings All,

I would like to update you on the Essential Air Service (EAS) situation at GreenbrierlWhite Sulphur Springs,

Beckley, ClarksburglFainnont, and Morgantown, West Virginia; and Staunton, Virginia, as well as give you an

opportunity to offer any comments on the record before we submit a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary

for Aviation and International Affairs.

As you know, by Order 2014-2-13, issued on February 19,2014, the Department requesting proposals from air

carriers interested in providing EAS at the above communities for a new term. In response to our request,.

Silver Airways, Boutique Air, City Link Air, and Sun Air submitted proposals for consideration. However, the

Department received multiple requests from air carriers asking that they be allowed to modify their proposals at

some or all of the communities. We reviewed those requests and found it to be in the public interest to grant

those requests. Therefore, the air carriers that submitted proposals in response to the most recent Request for

Proposals had until May 27, 2014, to submit a revised proposal, if they wished to do so.

I have attached each air carrier's revised proposal for your review and I expect them to be uploaded on

www.re!!ulations.!!ov sometime today, I request that you review the proposals and submit any comments you

may have as soon as possible, but no later than Thursday, June J 9,2014. Please send your comments directly to

scott.faulkiOldot.!!ov. Also, please forward this to all relevant parties that J have not included on the distribution

list.

Feel free to contact mc if you have any questions.

Kind Regards,

Scott Faulk

Transportation Industry Analyst

U.S. Department of Transp.ortation

Office of Aviation Analysis

EAS & Domestic Analysis Division

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

202- 366-9721

1
### §8527. Notice of provisions of subchapter

The Secretary shall prescribe a form of application for hospital treatment and domiciliary care which shall include notice of the provisions of this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1262, §5227; renumbered §8527, Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §402(b)(1), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 238; Pub. L. 102–83, §4(b)(1), (2)(E), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 404, 405.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–40 renumbered section 5227 of this title as this section.

Pub. L. 102–83 substituted "Secretary" for "Administrator".
### SUBCHAPTER I—STATE WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH INSTITUTE
#### § 9601.105 DAEO's responsibilities.

The NCUA DAEO may issue Instructions governing the submission of requests for approval of outside employment. The Instructions may exempt categories of employment from prior approval requirement of this section based on a determination that employment within those categories of employment would generally be approved and is not likely to involve conduct prohibited by statute or Federal regulation, including 5 CFR part 2635. The DAEO may include in these Instructions examples of outside employment that are permissible or impermissible consistent with this part and 5 CFR part 2635, including examples of other credit union-related entities.
No. II-10-052 

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417 

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416 

June 30, 2010 

E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 

NRC TO MEET WITH NFS TO DISCUSS 

APPARENT VIOLATIONS STEMMING FROM OCTOBER 2009 EVENT 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a predecisional enforcement 

conference in Atlanta for Tuesday, July 13 with officials of Nuclear Fuel Services in Erwin, Tenn. 

The meeting is being held to discuss apparent violations of NRC requirements associated 

with the augmented inspection of an Oct. 13, 2009 incident at the NFS facility. It will begin at 1 

p.m. at the NRC Region II office in Atlanta, located in the Marquis One Tower at 245 Peachtree 

Center Ave., NE. The meeting will be open to observation by the public, and NRC officials will be 

available at its conclusion to answer questions. 

On Oct. 13, 2009, during work on a commercial process line, a chemical reaction occurred 

during the dissolution of scrap material, resulting in unexpected levels of heat and the release of 

nitrogen compound gas fumes within the facility. No one was injured. The NRC dispatched a 

Special Inspection Team to the facility to investigate the event and within days, escalated the effort 

by adding additional inspectors to form an Augmented Inspection Team. That team identified some 

issues resulting in the apparent violations to be discussed at the enforcement conference. 

No decision on enforcement action will be made at the meeting. NRC officials will review 

information presented by NFS at the meeting and reach a decision on appropriate regulatory action 

at a later date. 

The NRC AIT inspection report is available through the Region II office or through the 

NRC Web page at www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. The number to access the document is 

ML100780127. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

245 Peachtree Center Ave. NE, Suite 1200 

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
### SUBCHAPTER I—LABORATORY MODERNIZATION AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER