alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION1350)

 

In connection with the Annual Report of LFG International,Inc. (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2004,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, LyleDurham, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Sect. 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sect 1350), that to my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

 

***/s/ Lyle Durham***

Lyle Durham, Chief Financial Officer

Dated: December 17, 2004

----
BCD 1995-90 BA # 2409
No: 13-077 September 12, 2013

CONTACT: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200 

NRC Seeks Public Comment on Proposed Rule and Environmental Study of 

Extended Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is seeking public comment on a proposed rule and 

supporting environmental study on the effects of extended storage of spent nuclear fuel beyond the 

licensed operating life of commercial reactors.

The proposed rule will be published tomorrow in the Federal Register. The public comment 

period will last for 75 days, through Nov. 27.

The proposed rule, known as “waste confidence,” would replace a similar provision in NRC’s 

environmental regulations that was vacated last year by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of 

Columbia Circuit. The rule does not authorize extended storage of spent fuel at reactor sites – a 

separate license is required for that. Rather, waste confidence is a generic finding of the environmental 

impacts of storing spent fuel for extended periods beyond the licensed operating life of reactors. The 

draft Waste Confidence Generic Environmental Impact Statement forms the regulatory basis for the 

proposed rule. The draft statement was distributed Sept. 6 and is available on the NRC’s waste 

confidence webpage. The proposed rule will also be available on this page following publication.

Previous versions of the proposed rule and draft statement were made publicly available in July. 

The current versions incorporate additional material and editorial changes directed by the Commission 

in a Staff Requirements Memorandum dated Aug. 5.

Public comments may be submitted several ways: Online through the federal government’s 

rulemaking website, www.regulations.gov using Docket ID NRC-2012-0246; by e-mail to 

Rulemaking.Comments@nrc.gov; by fax to 301-415-1101; by mail to Secretary, U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission, Washington DC 20555-0001, ATTN: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff; 

or by hand delivery to 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md., between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. on 

federal workdays. 

Comments may also be provided orally or in writing at one of 12 public meetings the NRC staff 

will hold around the country in October and November, part of the agency’s extensive public outreach 

effort on the waste confidence project. Details of these meetings are available on the NRC’s waste 

confidence webpage. All comments will be considered no matter how they are submitted.
### **CHAPTER 22—INDIAN HOSPITALS AND HEALTH FACILITIES**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION

Sec.
2001.
Hospitals and health facilities transferred to Public Health Service; restriction on closing hospitals.
2002.
Transfer of hospitals and facilities to State or private institutions; conditions and restrictions; failure to meet requirements.
2003.
Regulations.
2004.
Transfer of personnel, property, records, monies.
2004a.
Sanitation facilities.
2004b.
Implementation of education, hospital and health facility, etc., contracts and grants by Public Health Service personnel; request for detail of personnel.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—CONSTRUCTION OF HEALTH FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY HOSPITALS

2005.
Financial assistance by Surgeon General.
2005a.
Amount of assistance; determination of costs.
2005b.
Conditions of assistance.
2005c.
Payments.
2005d.
Eligibility of assisted project for aid under other acts; excluded costs.
2005e.
Definitions.
2005f.
Supervision or control of assisted hospitals.
#### § 930.110 Objectives.

The purpose of this subpart is to describe mediation procedures which Federal and State agencies may use to attempt to resolve serious disagreements which arise during the administration of approved management programs.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2



                                   PENGE CORP.
                            PROMISSORY NOTE EXTENSION

                                                Date: December 1, 2006


To whom it may concern;


      o     Penge Corp has a $30,000 promissory note with Philip Oleson that is
            due on December 13, 2006.

      o     The parties agree to extend the promissory notes on a month to month
            basis. The promissory notes can be called due with 30 days notice.
            The notes are extended with all terms remaining the same.



PENGE CORPORATION

By: /s/ KC Holmes
    ------------------------------
Name:  KC Holmes
Title: President, Penge Corp
3327 West Wadley, Suite 3-366, Midland, Texas 79707
432-967-1284

Date: 12/1/06


LENDER:

Signature: /s/ Philip Oleson
           ------------------------------
Name: Philip Oleson

Address: 844 W Bogus View Dr
         Eagle, ID 83616
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 13

- 11932 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 9:11

- cr - 80188

- DTKH

- 1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,
versus MIGUEL ANGEL HERNANDEZ

- ABRAHAM, a.k.a. Miguel Hernandez, Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

________________________ (December 30, 2013) Before PRYOR , MAR TIN, and FAY , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Case: 13-11932 Date Filed: 12/30/2013 Page: 1 of 32 Miguel Hernandez

- Abraham appeals his 77

- month sentence after pleading guilty to one count of illegal reentry into the United States after having been deported, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(2). On app eal, he argues the district judge lacked authority to increase his sentence , based upon prior convictions that were neither charged in the indictment nor proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. W e affirm. We review constitutional sentencing issues de novo . United States v. Steed , 548 F .3d 961, 978 (11th Cir. 2008) (per curiam). I n Almendarez

- Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 226

- 27 , 118 S. Ct. 1219, 1222 (1998) , the Supreme Court held the government does not need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt a defendant had prior convictions or allege those prior convictions in the indictment in order to
use them to enhance a defendant’s sentence under a federal statute. Although the Supreme Court has since expressed some doubt as to whether Almendarez

- Torres
was correctly decided, it has explicitly declined to revisit that decision. Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 489

- 90, 120 S. Ct. 2348, 2362 (2000) ; see also Alleyne v. United States , 133 S. Ct. 2151, 2160 n.1 (2013) (declini ng to revisit Almendarez

- Torres , because the parties did not contest that decision ). Rather, t he Supreme Court has maintained , “[o]ther than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory ma ximum

Case: 13-11932 Date Filed: 12/30/2013 Page: 2 of 33 must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 490, 120 S. Ct. at 2362

- 63. Furthermore, we since have held Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez

- Torres
. United States v. Beckles , 565 F.3d 832, 846 (11th Cir. 2009) ; United States v. Gibson , 434 F.3d 1234, 1246

- 47 (11th Cir. 2006)
. We have also
r ecognized that we are “bound to follow Almendarez

- Torres unless and until the Supreme Court itself overrules that decision.” United States v. Thomas , 242 F.3d 102 8, 1035 (11th Cir. 2001). Because Hernandez

- Abraham concedes binding precedent forecloses his argument , the district judge erred by enhancing his sentence based on prior convictions not charged in the indictment or proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt
. AFFIRMED. Case: 13-11932 Date Filed: 12/30/2013 Page: 3 of 3
#### § 1105.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to describe the factors the Commission considers when determining whether or not to contribute to the cost of an individual, a group of individuals, a public or private organization or association, partnership or corporation (hereinafter “participant”) who participates with the Commission in developing standards. The provisions of this part do not apply to and do not affect the Commission's ability and authority to contract with persons or groups outside the Commission to aid the Commission in developing proposed standards.
### SUBCHAPTER I—STANDARDS AND OBLIGATIONS OF RESIDENCY IN FEDERALLY ASSISTED HOUSING
#### § 1112.39 What records should a third party conformity assessment body retain regarding an audit?

A third party conformity assessment body must retain all records related to an audit that it receives from an accreditation body regarding a reassessment and all records pertaining to the third party conformity assessment body's resolution of, or plans for, resolving nonconformities identified through a reassessment by an accreditation body or through an examination by the CPSC. A third party conformity assessment body also must retain such records related to the last three reassessments (or however many reassessments have been conducted, if the third party conformity assessment body has been reassessed less than three times) and make such records available to the CPSC, upon request.
### §5108. Audit of private organizations

A private organization (except a political party or committee constituted for the election of federal officials), whether or not organized for profit and whether or not any of its income inures to the benefit of any person, that performs services or conducts activities in the United States Capitol Buildings or Grounds is subject to a special audit of its accounts for each year in which it performs those services or conducts those activities. The Comptroller General shall conduct the audit and report the results of the audit to the Senate and the House of Representatives.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1178.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 5108 | 40:193m–1. | Pub. L. 91–510, title IV, §451(a), Oct. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 1193. |

Section

The words "as defined by or pursuant to law" are omitted as unnecessary because of sections 5101 and 5102 of the revised title. The words "Comptroller General" are substituted for "General Accounting Office" because of 31:702 and for consistency in the revised title.
§ 923.96 Grant amendments. ( a ) Actions that require an amendment to a grant award such as a request for additional Federal funds, changes in the amount of the non-Federal share, changes in the approved project budget as specified in 15 CFR part 24, or extension of the grant period must be submitted to the Assistant Administrator and approved in writing by the NOAA Grants Officer prior to initiation of the contemplated change. Such requests should be submitted at least 30 days prior to the proposed effective date of the change and, if appropriate, accompanied by evidence of compliance with E.O. 12372 requirements.
( b ) NOAA shall acknowledge receipt of the grantee's request within the ten (10) working days of receipt of the correspondence. This notification shall indicate NOAA's decision regarding the request; or indicate a time-frame within which a decision will be made.
§ 1051.9 Factors the Commission considers in granting or denying petitions. ( a ) The major factors the Commission considers in deciding whether to grant or deny a petition regarding a product include the following items: ( 1 ) Whether the product involved presents an unreasonable risk of injury.
( 2 ) Whether a rule is reasonably necessary to eliminate or reduce the risk of injury.
( 3 ) Whether failure of the Commission to initiate the rulemaking proceeding requested would unreasonably expose the petitioner or other consumers to the risk of injury which the petitioner alleges is presented by the product.
( 4 ) Whether, in the case of a petition to declare a consumer product a “banned hazardous product” under section 8 of the CPSA, the product is being or will be distributed in commerce and whether a feasible consumer product safety standard would adequately protect the public from the unreasonable risk of injury associated with such product.
( b ) In considering these factors, the Commission will treat as an important component of each one the relative priority of the risk of injury associated with the product about which the petition has been filed and the Commission's resources available for rulemaking activities with respect to that risk of injury. The CPSC Policy on Establishing Priorities for Commission Action, 16 CFR 1009.8, sets forth the criteria upon which Commission priorities are based.
No: 14-020 March 24, 2014

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

NRC Seeks Comment on Proposed Revision to Acceptance Criteria

For Emergency Cooling Systems at U.S. Reactors

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is seeking comment on a proposed change to agency 

regulations regarding the acceptance criteria for emergency systems to cool the reactor core if an 

accident occurred at a U.S. nuclear power plant.

The proposed rule reflects recent research findings that identified new damage mechanisms for 

zirconium alloy-covered fuel rods during a loss-of-coolant accident. The proposed rule would also 

apply to all fuel types and cladding materials, as well as address a petition for rulemaking regarding 

crud, oxide deposits and hydrogen content in zirconium-alloy fuel cladding. The proposed rule would 

ensure an acceptable level of fuel rod performance following a loss-of-coolant accident, providing

adequate protection of public health and safety. The proposed rule would also provide licensees the 

option to use risk-informed methods to address the effects of debris during long-term cooling following 

a loss-of-coolant accident.

The proposed rule is not part of the NRC’s response to the 2011 events at Fukushima, but an 

outcome of a Nuclear Energy Institute petition for rulemaking in 2000, direction given to the staff by -

+_the Commission in 2003, and findings of a 10-year research program ending in 2008. Thus, the 

development of the proposed rule pre-dates the Japan events by several years.

For more information on the proposed rule, contact NRC staff members Tara Inverso by phone 

at 301-415-1024 or via e-mail tara.inverso@nrc.gov; or Paul M. Clifford by phone 301-415-4043, via 

e-mail paul.clifford@nrc.gov.

Comments on the changes will be accepted until June 9, following publication of the proposed 

rule in the Federal Register . The Federal Register notice also opens a comment period for three related 

draft regulatory guides. The notice includes instructions and the relevant Docket IDs for submitting 

comments on both the rule and on the guides. Comments may be submitted on the Regulations.gov

website; by e-mail to Rulemaking.Comments@nrc.gov ; hand delivered to: 11555 Rockville Pike, 

Rockville, Md., between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. (EST) federal workdays; telephone: 301-415-1677; 

mailed to

Secretary 

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Washington, DC 20555-0001 

ATTN: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff 

or submitted by fax to: Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission at 301-415-1101.
§ 960.2 Jurisdiction. ( a ) The regulations in this part set forth the requirements for the operation of private remote sensing space systems within the United States or by a U.S. person.
( b ) Instruments used primarily for mission assurance or other technical purposes, including but not limited to navigation, attitude control, monitoring spacecraft health, separation events, or payload deployments, such as traditional star trackers, sun sensors, and horizon sensors, shall not be subject to this part.
( c ) In the case of a system that is used for remote sensing and other purposes, as determined by the Secretary, the scope of the license issued under this part will not extend to the operation of instruments that do not support remote sensing.
( d ) The Secretary does not authorize the use of spectrum for radio communications by a private remote sensing space system.
No: III-14-004 February 11, 2014

CONTACT: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663

NRC Regional Office to Discuss Davis-Besse Steam Generator 

Installation: Webinar to be Held on February 20

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Region III office will hold a webinar Feb. 20 to discuss 

inspection efforts for Davis-Besse’s installation of two steam generators and how the agency’s activities 

help ensure the public and environment are protected.

“We are committed to having discussions about the NRC’s oversight of nuclear power plants,” 

said NRC Region III Administrator Cynthia D. Pederson. “This webinar will give us an opportunity to 

continue the dialogue with the public about issues of interest to them.”

The NRC Region III office, located in Lisle, Ill., will explain our regulations, discuss our 

inspection process and answer questions associated with the plant’s new steam generator installation.

The webinar will be held from 6:00-7:00 p.m. EDT (5:00-6:00 p.m. CDT). Participants will be 

able to view presentation slides prepared by NRC staff and submit questions in writing over the Internet. 

Interested members of the public must register online or follow the instructions on the meeting notice in 

order to participate.
§ 1000.10 The Chairman and Vice Chairman. ( a ) The Chairman is the principal executive officer of the Commission and, subject to the general policies of the Commission and to such regulatory decisions, findings, and determinations as the Commission is by law authorized to make, he or she exercises all of the executive and administrative functions of the Commission.
( b ) The Commission shall annually elect a Vice Chairman for a term beginning on June 1. The Vice Chairman shall serve until the election of his or her successor. The Vice Chairman acts in the absence or disability of the Chairman or in case of a vacancy in the Office of the Chairman.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 224 (Monday, November 22, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 67949]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25853]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Petroleum Environmental Research Forum Project 
No. 2002-13

    Notice is hereby given that, on October 20, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Petroleum Environmental 
Research Forum Project No. 2002-13 (``PERF Project No. 2002-13'') has 
filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General 
and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the 
parties to the venture and (2) the nature and objectives of the 
venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the 
Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties 
to the venture are: ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company, 
Fairfax, VA; ConocoPhillips Company, Houston, TX; and Unocal, 
Sugarland, TX. The nature and objectives of the venture are to create a 
forum for sharing information regarding the industry's water management 
practices. This may include water reuse solutions in practice, rejected 
reuse solutions, case studies in the area of water reuse/minimization/
optimization, produced water reclamation, wastewater recovery, and 
tools used to develop these solutions. The program will be carried out 
through compiling, presenting and exchanging of individual research 
projects, including identification of methods to improve water 
management for industry.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-25853 Filed 11-19-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

Directorate Identifier: 2009

- NM

- 247

- AD

**Costs:** Labor per airplane (1 work hour(s) x $8 5 /hour) $ 340 Parts per airplane $ + 0 Cost per airplane $ 340 Number of U.S.

- registered airplanes x 354 Total fleet cost $ 120,360

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
### Part F—Interagency Program for Trauma Research
### SUBCHAPTER XII—ELECTRICITY
August 8, 2016

Mr. Gregory S. Walden

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Counsel for AeroCine Ventures LLC

1333 New Hampshire Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20037

Re: FAA–2014–0400

Dear Mr. Walden:

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and 

have determined that we will continue to process your petition. 

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov, we 

are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently-issued regulation, 

Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations, Part 107 (www.faa.gov/uas) will satisfy your request. We have determined that 

your request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your 

petition for exemption. 

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will 

publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments, if we have 

not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you 

have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov. 

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst
### §140702. Organization

(a) Federal Charter.—Military Order of the World Wars (in this chapter, the "corporation"), a nonprofit corporation incorporated in the District of Columbia, is a federally chartered corporation.

(b) Expiration of Charter.—The charter granted by this chapter expires if the corporation fails to comply with any provision of—

(1) its bylaws or articles of incorporation;

(2) this chapter; or

(3) the laws of the District of Columbia that apply to corporations such as the corporation recognized under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1384.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 140702(a) | 36:5001. | Oct. 23, 1992, Pub. L. 102–484, title XVIII, §§1801, 1815 (last sentence), 1816, 106 Stat. 2581, 2583. |
| 140702(b) | 36:5014 (last sentence).36:5015. | |

Section

36:5015.

Subsection (a) is substituted for the source provision for consistency in the revised title.

In subsection (b), the words "restriction or other" in 36:5015 are omitted as unnecessary. The text of 36:5014 (last sentence) is omitted as unnecessary because of clause (2) of the revised subsection.
### SUBCHAPTER XI—PERSONNEL AND TRAINING