alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 50.10 Fee structure for special population censuses.

The Bureau of the Census is authorized to conduct special population censuses at the request of and at the expense of the community concerned. To obtain a special population census, an authorized official of the community should write a letter to the Associate Director for Demographic Fields, Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C. 20233, requesting detailed information and stating the approximate present population. The Associate Director will reply giving an estimate of the cost and other pertinent information. Title 13, United State Code, section 196, Special Censuses, requires payment to the Bureau of the actual or estimated cost of each such special census.

[47 FR 18, Jan. 4, 1982]
§ 831.1210 Annuity rights after a disability annuity terminates. ( a ) An individual is entitled to an immediate annuity when the disability annuity stops because of recovery or restoration to earning capacity if the individual is not reemployed in a position subject to civil service retirement coverage and— ( 1 ) Is at least age 50 when the disability annuity stops and had 20 or more years of service at the time of retirement for disability; or
( 2 ) Had 25 or more years of service at the time of retirement for disability regardless of age.
( b ) An individual whose annuity stops because of recovery or restoration to earning capacity and who is not eligible for an immediate annuity under paragraph (a) of this section, is eligible for a deferred annuity upon reaching age 62.
( c ) The disability annuity of an individual whose annuity stopped because of recovery or restoration to earning capacity may be reinstated under § 831.1212 of this part.
Jame s Turner/R6/USEPA/U S 05/09/200 7 04:5 4 P M , T o Rebamburg@aol.co m ccShaw n Ghose/R6/USEPA/US@EP A bc c Subject Re : Graham/Roger s Roa d legal Q PRIVILEGE D AN D CONFIDENTIA L Bob , I hav e talke d wit h th e RP M an d I thin k w e ca n probabl yfi xSub-Par a 4(a) , b yhavin g th e ful l restrictio n o n groun d wate rus e o n th e 1.3 8 acr e tract , bu t o n th e large r20,29 6 acr e trac t requir e onl ya prio rwritte n approva l o fEP ARegio n 6 Superfun d Divisio n wit h cop yt o th e Stat e (ADEQ) , fo rinstallatio n o rus e o fa groun d wate rwell
. Wha t d o yo u think ? Jame s L
. Turne r Senio rAttorne y Offic e o fRegiona l Counse l (6RC-S ) U:S

. EP ARegio n 6 144 5 Ros s Avenue , Ste

. 120 0 Dallas , Texa s 75202-273 3 E-Mail : Turner.James@epa.go v, Ph : (214)665-315 9 Fax : (214 ) 665-646 0

905033 9
### Part A—Renewable Fuel Standard
### §5107. Concerts on grounds

Sections 5102, 5103, 5104(b)–(f), 5105, 5106, and 5109 of this title and sections 9, 9A, 9B, and 9C of the Act of July 31, 1946 (ch. 707, 60 Stat. 719, 720), do not prohibit a band in the service of the Federal Government from giving concerts in the United States Capitol Grounds at times which will not interfere with Congress and as authorized by the Architect of the Capitol.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1178; Pub. L. 108–178, §3(2), Dec. 15, 2003, 117 Stat. 2640.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 5107 | 40:193l. | July 31, 1946, ch. 707, §13, 60 Stat. 720. |

Section

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Sections 9, 9A, 9B, and 9C of the Act of July 31, 1946, referred to in text, are classified to sections 1961, 1966, 1967, and 1922, respectively, of Title 2, The Congress.

#### Amendments

2003—Pub. L. 108–178 substituted "5105, 5106" for "5105, 5105".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2003 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 108–178 effective Aug. 21, 2002, see section 5 of Pub. L. 108–178, set out as a note under section 5334 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
### Part A—Headstart Programs
### SUBCHAPTER V—HUMAN SPACE FLIGHT
#### Publicity Leasing Company, Appellant, *v.*Alfred Ludwig, Superintendent of Buildings, Borough of Manhattan, City of New York, and Others, Respondents.

First Department,

May 21, 1915.

See head note in *Southern Leasing Co.*v. *Ludwig (ante,*p. 233).

Appeal by the plaintiff, Publicity Leasing Company, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 8 th day of February, 1915, denying its motion for an injunction *pendente lite.*

*Walter H. Bond,*for the appellant.

*John P. O’Brien,*for the respondent superintendent of buildings.

*Hector M. Hitchings,*for the respondents Mecca Realty Company and another.

Scott, J.:

For the reasons stated in *Southern Leasing Co.*v. *Ludwig*(168 App. Div. 233), decided herewith, the order appealed from will be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant against the Mecca Realty Company and the O. J. Crude Company, and the motion for an injunction granted, to the extent indicated in the opinion in above-mentioned case.

McLaughlin, Laughlin and Clarke, JJ., concurred; Ingraham, P. J., dissented.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant against the Mecca Realty Company and the O. J. Crude Company, and the motion for injunction granted to extent indicated in opinion. Order to he settled on notice.
§ 930.154 Listing activities subject to routine interstate consistency review. ( a ) *Geographic location of listed activities.* Each coastal State intending to conduct a consistency review of federal activities occurring in another State shall: ( 1 ) List those Federal agency activities, federal license or permit activities, and federal assistance activities that the State intends to routinely review for consistency; and
( 2 ) Generally describe the geographic location for each type of listed activity.
( b ) In establishing the geographic location of interstate consistency review, each State must notify and consult with the State in which the listed activity will occur, as well as with relevant Federal agencies.
( c ) *Demonstrate effects.* In describing the geographic location for interstate consistency reviews, the State agency shall provide information to the Director that coastal effects from listed activities occurring within the geographic area are reasonably foreseeable. Listed activities may have different geographic location descriptions, depending on the nature of the activity and its effects on any coastal use or resource. For example, the geographic location for activities affecting water resources or uses could be described by shared water bodies, river basins, boundaries under the State's coastal nonpoint pollution control program, or other ecologically identifiable areas.
( d ) *Director approval.* State agencies shall submit their lists and geographic location descriptions developed under this section to the Director for approval as a routine program change under subpart H of 15 CFR part 923. Each State submitting this program change shall include evidence of consultation with States in which the activity will occur, evidence of consultation with relevant Federal agencies, and any agreements with other States and Federal agencies regarding coordination of activities.
( e ) *State failure to list interstate activities.* A coastal State that fails to list federal activities subject to interstate review, or to describe the geographic location for these activities, under paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section, may not exercise its right to review activities occurring in other States, until the State meets the listing requirements. The listing of activities subject to interstate consistency review, and the description of the geographic location for those listed activities, should ensure that coastal States have the opportunity to review relevant activities occurring in other States. States may amend their lists and geographic location descriptions pursuant to the requirements of this subpart and subpart H of 15 CFR part 923. States which have complied with paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section may also use the procedure at § 930.54 to review unlisted activities. States will have a transition period of 18 months from the date this rule takes effect. In that time a State may review an interstate activity pursuant to § 930.54 of this part. After the transition period States must comply with this subpart in order to review interstate activities.
§ 923.128 Revisions to assessments and strategies. ( a ) A State, in consultation with the Assistant Administrator, may propose to revise its approved Strategy. Revision(s) to an approved Strategy must be submitted to and approved by the Assistant Administrator prior to the initiation of the contemplated change.
( b ) The Assistant Administrator will review such proposed revision(s) and determine if public review and comment is required. This determination will be based on the extent to which the proposed revision(s) changes the original scope of the State's Strategy.
( c ) If the Assistant Administrator determines that public review and comment is necessary, he/she will notify the State of his/her determination. The State will be required to provide public review and comment in accordance with NOAA guidance.
( d ) A State that wants to revise substantively the program changes identified in its approved Strategy or to address new enhancement objectives not identified as a priority in the original Assessment, also must revise the Assessment through a public process as described in NOAA's guidance.
( e ) The Assistant Administrator, in consultation with the State, may reduce a state's weighting factor assigned to its Strategy as a result of failure to meet the milestones in its Strategy.
( f ) The Assistant Administrator will notify the State of his/her decision to approve or deny the proposed revision(s) to the Strategy, and any change in the weighting factor assigned to its Strategy.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-53,019] 

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers at Thermal Engineering International, Utility Products Division, Joplin, Missouri. The application contained no new substantial information which would bear importantly on the Department's determination. Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued. 
      ( print page 5871)    
TA-W-53,019; Thermal Engineering International Utility Products Division, Joplin, Missouri (January 16, 2003) 

Signed at Washington, DC this 27th day of January 2004. 

Timothy Sullivan, 

Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 04-2604 Filed 2-5-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
ARMENIA: REPORT ON ARMAVIR PROVINCE

----

APRIL 1999
INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT, US AND FOREIGN COMMERCIAL SERVICE AND U.S.DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 1998.  ALL RIGHTS RESERVED OUTSIDE OF THE UNITEDSTATES.
--------
#### Herman Weiss, Appellant, v. Martin Weiss et al., Respondents.

Hagarty, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur. [See *post,*p. 801.]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Norman J. Brabson, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Present — Cohn, J. P., Breitel, Bastow, Botein and Bergan, JJ.; Breitel, J., taking no part.
Files available through this site represent the digital component of the Map of Surficial Deposits in the Eastern and Central United States (East of 102 degrees West Longitude), U.S. Geological Investigations Series I-2789.

This following files are provided in .ZIP or .tar.gz archives:

	i-2789.txt--the metadata for the data

	sfgeoep020.*--the shapefiles of the geology polygons
	sfgeoel020.*--the shapefiles of the geology arcs
	glacall020.*--the shapefiles of the glacial limit lines
	glacagl020.*--the shapefiles of the glacial limit lines and decorations
			that are only properly displayed in Lambert_Azuthimal
			projection with the following parameters:  Radius of the
			sphere of projection, 6370997; Longitude of projection
			center, -100; and Latitude of projection center, 45.

	sfgeoem020l.e00--the lambert_azimuthal coverage of the geology
	sfgeoem020.e00--the geographic coverage of the geology
	glacall020l.e00--the lambert_azimuthal coverage of the glacial limit lines
	glacall020l.e00--the lambert_azimuthal coverage of the glacial limit lines
				and decorations
	glacall020.e00--the geographic coverage of the glacial limit lines



Chuck Bush
cbush@usgs.gov
(303) 236-4723
## SUBTITLE III—INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT

Chapter
Sec.
111.
GENERAL
11101
113.
RESPONSIBILITY FOR ACQUISITIONS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
11301
115.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACQUISITION PILOT PROGRAM
11501
117.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT MATTERS
11701

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2002**—Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title VIII, §825(b)(3)(G), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2616, and Pub. L. 107–347, title II, §210(h)(3)(H), Dec. 17, 2002, 116 Stat. 2939, amended item for chapter 115 identically, substituting "PROGRAM" for "PROGRAMS".
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-4537

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus HUMBERTO VALLE, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-03-448) Submitted: June 30, 2005 Decided: August 2, 2005 Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David B. Freedman, WHITE & CRUMPLER, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellant. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney, Sandra J. Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Humberto Valle pled guilty to conspiracy to distribute more than five kilograms of cocaine hydrochloride, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2000). He was sentenced to the statutory mandatory minimum term of 120 months of imprisonment. See21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A) (2000). Valle appeals his sentence. Valle argues that the district court erred in applying the federal sentencing guidelines as mandatory in violation of United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). Because Valle did not object to his sentence in the district court on these grounds, our review is for plain error. United States v. Hughes , 401 F.3d 540, 547 (4th Cir. 2005). To demonstrate plain error, Valle must establish that error occurred, that it was plain, and that it affected his substantial rights. Id. at 547-48. If a defendant establishes these requirements, the court’s “discretion is appropriately exercised only when failure to do so would result in a miscarriage of justice, such as when the defendant is actually innocent or the error seriously affects the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings.” Id. at 555 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). In United States v. White , 405 F.3d 208, 216-17 (4th Cir. 2005), we held that treating the guidelines as mandatory was error and that the error was plain. However, in the absence of a Sixth Amendment violation prejudice is not presumed, and the defendant- 3 - bears the burden of showing that the error in application of the then-mandatory guidelines affected the outcome of the district court proceedings. Id. at 223. We find Valle fails to meet this burden because he was sentenced to the statutory mandatory minimum term of imprisonment, and thus the mandatory application of the guidelines had no effect on his actual sentence. Accordingly, we affirm Valle’s conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING ON APRIL 13 WITH ENTERGY NUCLEAR 

TO DISCUSS RESULTS OF INDEPENDENT SAFETY CULTURE SURVEYS 

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Entergy Nuclear 

Operations, Inc., on Tuesday, April 13 to discuss the results of independent safety culture 

surveys conducted by the company at all of its nuclear power plants last year. The specific focus 

of this meeting will be the survey results for Entergy’s plants in the Northeastern United States: 

Indian Point and James A. FitzPatrick, in New York State; Pilgrim, in Massachusetts; and 

Vermont Yankee, in Vermont. 

 The meeting, which will be open to the public, will begin at 1:30 p.m. in the Public 

Meeting Room of the NRC’s Region I Office in King of Prussia, Pa. (Directions to the Region I 

Office are available on the agency’s web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/aboutnrc/locations/region1.html.) There will be an opportunity for members of the public to ask 

questions of NRC staff prior to the session’s adjournment. 

 Members of the public who would like to listen to the meeting by phone can do so by 

calling 1-800-621-8432 and using pass code 44732. 

 “An environment which allows and encourages plant workers to raise safety-related 

concerns is vital to ensure the safe operation of nuclear power plants,” NRC Region I Deputy 

Administrator Marc Dapas said. “This discussion will be helpful to aid our understanding of 

Entergy’s actions at its Region I facilities.” 

 Additional public meetings on the Entergy safety culture surveys were held on March 29 

in the NRC’s Region III Office, to discuss the results from the company’s Palisades plant, and on 

March 31 in the agency’s Region IV Office, to discuss the company’s Arkansas Nuclear One, 

Grand Gulf, River Bend and Waterford plants. 

 The meetings are being held to adhere to a commitment made by Entergy as part of an 

Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) agreement reached with the NRC in 2009 concerning a 

security-related issue at the Palisades nuclear power plant, which is located in Covert, Mich. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region I 

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406 

E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. I-10-015 

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

April 6, 2010

Email: OPA1.RESOURCE@nrc.gov
### Part A–1—Electric Transmission
EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Silver Foot, Inc. d/b/a Sierra Railroad Company; BA No. 2752

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board regarding the status of Silver

Foot, Inc. d/b/a Sierra Railroad Company ("SFI"), BA No. 2752, as an employer under the

Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. §231 et seq.KRRA) and Railroad Unemployment

Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. §351 et seq.H'RUIA).

Information obtained in a letter dated February 5, 1996 establishes that on March 16, 1995,

SFI sold all of its Sierra Railroad Company ("SRC") assets to Sierra Pacific Coast Railway,

Inc. ("SPCR") d/b/a The Eccles and Eastern Railroad Company ("ECCLES"), BA No. 3789,

with the exception of three locomotives which were leased to SPCR under a long term

equipment lease. SFI ceased operation of SRC on March 16, 1995. On September 29, 1995,

Sierra Railroad, a Division of Coast Enterprises, Inc. ("SR"), BA No. 2774, acquired SRC

from ECCLES. SFI has no current relationship with either SPCR or SR.

Information in the record establishes that SFI is no longer in business and that it was last in

business on March 16, 1995. Accordingly, the Board finds that effective with the close of

business March 16, 1995, Silver Foot, Inc. d/b/a Sierra Railroad Company ceased to be an

employer under the RRA and the RUIA.

Glen L. Bower

hF-’ V. M. Speakman, Jr

erome F. Kever

BCD 1996-42

BA# 2752
EXHIBIT 32.1  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") by Gold Horse International, Inc. (the "Registrant"), I, Liankuan Yang, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of Registrant.  /s/ Liankuan YangLiankuan YangChief Executive Officer, principal executive officer  Dated: September 28, 2011   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.