alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Isadore J. Badura, Appellant, v. Arthur C. Badura, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur. (Appeal from a judgment for defendant for no cause of action in an automobile negligence action.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.
#### § 930.30 Objectives.

The provisions of this subpart are intended to assure that all Federal agency activities including development projects affecting any coastal use or resource will be undertaken in a manner consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the enforceable policies of approved management programs. The provisions of subpart I of this part are intended to supplement the provisions of this subpart for Federal agency activities having interstate coastal effects.
No: II-13-037 May 16, 2013

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416

NRC to Increase Oversight of Turkey Point Nuclear Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is increasing its oversight of Unit 3 at the Turkey 

Point nuclear power plant as a result of the number of unplanned shutdowns the plant has experienced. 

The Turkey Point plant is located near Homestead, Fla., about 20 miles south of Miami, and is operated 

by Florida Power & Light Co. 

After its quarterly review of plant performance in April, the NRC updated its assessment of 

Turkey Point Unit 3. That evaluation consisted of a review of performance indicators and inspection 

results. 

The NRC review found that Turkey Point Unit 3 crossed the green-to-white threshold for the 

“unplanned scrams per 7,000 critical hours” performance indicator. This was due to three trips in the 

first quarter this year. 

“Overall, the Turkey Point plant continues to operate safely,” said NRC Region II 

Administrator Victor McCree. “However, these shutdowns point to potential performance issues and 

we want to ensure that the company addresses them appropriately.” 

The NRC will conduct a supplemental inspection to provide assurance that the causes of the 

shutdowns are understood, to identify the extent of condition, and to ensure FPL’s corrective actions 

are sufficient.

The NRC evaluates inspection findings and performance indicators at commercial nuclear 

power plants with a color-coded system which classifies them as green, white, yellow or red, in 

increasing order of safety significance. As the significance increases, the NRC heightens the level of 

oversight for that plant including additional inspections. If a plant takes appropriate corrective actions 

and improves safety performance, the agency returns to its normal, but still extensive, inspection 

schedule.
#### In the Matter of the Adoption of Joseph R. Gardner, an Infant. Pasquale Longarelli et al., Appellants; Winona B. Gardner, Respondent.

Nt opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.
No: II-13-053 August 23, 2013

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416 

NRC Issues Confirmatory Action Letter to Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has outlined a list of actions committed to by the 

Tennessee Valley Authority intended to ensure the continued improvement of the utility’s Browns Ferry 

nuclear plant.

After those actions are completed by TVA and inspected by the NRC, the agency will reevaluate 

its increased oversight stemming from a high safety significance (red) inspection finding finalized in 

2011.

The Browns Ferry plant is near Athens, Ala., about 32 miles west of Huntsville.

The NRC sent a confirmatory action letter to TVA this week that confirms the list of Tier 1 

actions which TVA committed to in an Aug. 9 letter to the NRC. There are 10 Tier 1 actions scheduled 

to be completed by Nov. 30. Those actions include improvements in safety culture, the corrective action 

program, the safety system reliability plan, work management process and a procedure upgrade project. 

Once this group is completed, the NRC will determine the appropriate level of oversight.

The second group of longer-term actions, detailed by TVA in its Aug. 9 letter and focused on 

sustained excellent performance and long-term success criteria, are scheduled to be completed by Dec. 

15, 2014, though some are scheduled for completion as early as May 2014.

“The confirmatory action letter gives TVA a clear set of commitments and expectations, and 

ensures they understand what they must do to continue to safely operate the plant,” said Victor McCree, 

NRC Region II Administrator. “Browns Ferry has improved its safety performance, but it must continue 

to improve and sustain a high performance level.”

The red finding was issued due to the failure of a low-pressure coolant injection valve at Browns 

Ferry in the fall of 2010. That valve is part of a system relied upon for core cooling during certain 

accident scenarios. Even though the valve was promptly repaired after its condition was discovered, 

under the NRC’s oversight process a red finding has high safety significance and results in intensive 

NRC inspection and oversight.

A 23-person NRC team completed an intensive supplemental inspection at the plant in May. The 

supplemental inspection, which was divided into three parts, began in 2011 following the red finding.
Page | 2

(The confirmatory action letter will be available via the NRC website (search for 

ML13232A105). If you need an immediate copy, contact the NRC Region II Public Affairs Office.)
NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE MEDICAL USE OF ISOTOPES

NAMES NEW LEADERSHIP

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has named Bruce Thomadsen, Ph.D., as Chairman 

of the Advisory Committee on the Medical Use of Isotopes and Milton Guiberteau, M.D., as 

Vice-Chairman. The chairman and vice chairman are appointed by the director of NRC’s Office 

of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs. Former ACMUI 

Chairman Leon Malmud, M.D., has ended his term after 11 years of service and leadership on 

the committee.

The ACMUI, a group of experienced health care professionals, advises the NRC on 

policy and technical issues that arise in the regulation of medical uses of radioactive materials in 

diagnosis and therapy. The ACMUI members come from various disciplines and comment on 

changes to NRC regulations and guidance; evaluate certain non-routine uses of radioactive 

material; provide technical assistance in licensing, inspection and enforcement cases; and bring 

key issues to the Commission’s attention for appropriate action.

A complete listing of the ACMUI membership, their bios and public meeting schedule

can be found on the ACMUI web page.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 13-029 April 16, 2013
|                                                                                                                                                             |  | RUSSIAN TAX CERTIFICATION                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|**BISNISHome PageSearchBISNISEmbassyReportsCountryReportsIndustryReportsPublicationsSourcesof FinanceLeadsand EventsExchangeRatesState ExportsOtherSources** |  | April 1998by Kelly RafteryU.S. companies with business with operations in Russia often receive requests from the Russian
Government to complete a form  certifying that the company has paid U.S. tax on income from
subsidiaries.  The U.S. company must send this form for certification to the Internal Revenue
Service at the following address:Tony Skirkie
IRS 
11601 Roosevelt Blvd.
Philadelphia, PA 19255
Attn:   FIRPTA UnitInternational certifications are done on the night shift, from 4-12PM.  Mr. Skirkie can be reached
at the following numbers215-516-7229 (voice)
215-516-3906 (fax)
215-516-2555 (fax)
215-516-3412 (fax)All international certifications are done in Philadelphia, not in IRS regional offices.This report is provided courtesy of the Business Information Service for the Newly
Independent States (BISNIS)
Summary of interagency working comments on draft rule under EO 12866. These comments do not necessarily represent the views of OMB an d are subject to further policy review.

Suggested edits:

1) Page 11 Line 16: “EPA did not stay the e ffectiveness of the PSD Interpretive Memo pending reconsideration, but she did reiterate that the Memo “does not bind States issuing [PSD] permits under their own State Implementa tion Plans.” We suggest replacing “she” with “EPA” as the sentence begins with referring to the Agency rather than the

Administrator.

2) Page 12 last line continued on page 13: “We” should be replaced with “EPA” throughout

this section.

3) Page 29 Language suggestion - Second full sentence on the page: “However, in the absence of guidance on control strategies fr om EPA and other regulatory agencies, the BACT process may be [instead of is] more time and resource intensive when applied to a new pollutant

.

4) Would it be appropriate to call this package a final interpretive rule, rather than a notice of interpretation?

5) Suggested edit on Page 94-97: EPA might c onsider cutting back this text, which essentially boils down to two points: th e Act makes the PSD program automatically applicable once "EPA has determined to regulate a pollutant and such regulation is operative on the regulated activity," and the Act does not admit of any flexibility in these requirements except to the extent that will be addressed in the PSD Tailoring Rule. The text beginning with the paragra ph at the bottom of page 96 to the paragraph at the bottom of page 97 is repetitive and could be omitted.

6) Suggested edit to page 100-106: In the portion of the draft rule discussing the “Transition for Pending Permit Applications,” it might be advisable to add some more explicit discussion initially of what comments were received on this issue, and that this

section of the draft is intended to be a res ponse to those comments because this issue was not expressly raised in the proposal.

7) Page 1/Final Line: The following word in capita l letters is missing: “Thus, this notice explains THAT EPA . . . .”

8) Page 11/Second Line from the Bottom: Ther e should be a period after the parenthetical

date.

9) Page 49/Fifth Line from the Bottom: Th e word “asserts” should be “assert.”

10) Page 90/Line 12 and Final Sentence: The da te of “January 2, 2012” should be “January 2, 2011.” There is also no period for the co ncluding sentence at the bottom of the page.
#### § 766.4 Representation.

A respondent individual may appear and participate in person, a corporation by a duly authorized officer or employee, and a partnership by a partner. If a respondent is represented by counsel, counsel shall be a member in good standing of the bar of any State, Commonwealth or Territory of the United States, or of the District of Columbia, or be licensed to practice law in the country in which counsel resides if not the United States. A respondent personally, or through counsel or other representative, shall file a notice of appearance with the administrative law judge. BIS will be represented by the Office of Chief Counsel for Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce.

[61 FR 12907, Mar. 25, 1996, as amended at 67 FR 45633, July 10, 2002]
No: I-13-037 October 29, 2013

CONTACT: Diane Screnci 610-337-5330

 Neil Sheehan 610-337-5331

NRC Assigns New Resident Inspectors 

to Susquehanna Nuclear Power Plant

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia, Pa., have selected Jonathan Greives 

as the new Senior Resident Inspector, and Travis Daun as the new Resident Inspector at the Susquehanna 

Steam Electric Station, in Berwick, Pa. The two-unit site is operated by PPL Susquehanna, LLC. 

“Jon Greives and Travis Daun have the training, experience and commitment to safety that is 

needed for the NRC to carry out its mission of protecting people and the environment, and they will help 

ensure the safe operation of the Susquehanna units,” said NRC Region I Administrator Bill Dean.

Greives joined the NRC’s Region I office in King of Prussia, Pa., in June 

2009 as a project engineer. Most recently, he was the Resident Inspector at the 

Susquehanna Steam Electric Station. Prior to joining the NRC, Greives served for 

seven years in the Navy’s nuclear submarine force. During his naval service, he was 

a staff instructor at the Navy’s nuclear power training facilities and served aboard 

the USS Wyoming. He earned a bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from 

Bucknell University. 

Daun joined the NRC’s Region III office in Lisle, Ill., in April 2012 as a 

reactor engineer. Daun had previously served for eleven years in the Navy’s 

nuclear power program, most recently as the engineer officer aboard the nuclear 

submarine, the USS City of Corpus Christi. He has a bachelor’s degree in 

electrical engineering from Marquette University and a master’s in business 

management from American Intercontinental University.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They serve as 

the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major work projects and 

interacting with plant workers and the public. Resident inspectors can be assigned to any one site for up to 

seven years. 

The Susquehanna Resident Inspectors can be reached at (570) 542-2134.
#### § 904.215 Consolidation.

The Chief Administrative Law Judge may order that two or more administrative proceedings that involve substantially the same parties or the same issues be consolidated and/or heard together, either upon request of a party or *sua sponte.*
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Vincent Astor, Respondent, against Harry B. Chambers et al., Constituting the Tax Commission of the City of New York, Appellants. [Hotel St. Regis, 5th Ave. & 55th St., Borough of Manhattan.]

No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Van Yoorhis, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**CERTIFICATION     I, Barry Hollingsworth, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Stratos International, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:       a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;        b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and        c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):       a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and        b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: July 29, 2005         /s/ Barry Hollingsworth   Barry Hollingsworth  Chief Financial Officer  
91
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Surface Transportation Board 

The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from Harkins Cunningham on behalf of Canadian National Railway Company (WB525-9-11/9/2004), for permission to use certain data from the Board's Carload Waybill Samples. A copy of the request may be obtained from the Office of Economics, Environmental Analysis, and Administration. 

                    The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; therefore, if any parties object to these requests, they should file their objections with the Director of the Board's Office of Economics, Environmental Analysis, and Administration within 14 calendar days of the date of this notice. The rules for release of waybill data are codified at 49 CFR 1244.9.                           ( print page 68213)    

*Contact:*                     Mac Frampton, (202) 565-1541.                 

Vernon A. Williams, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 04-25929 Filed 11-22-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
#### Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. Britton Realty Corporation et al., Impleaded with Anna R. Mahnken et al.

Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.; Martin, P. J., taking no part.
#### § 1500.14 Manufacturer.

*Manufacturer* means any person engaged in the manufacturing of commercial concrete masonry products in the United States.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# July 2012 Report on The Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206.

Accession Number: ML12207A114

Date Released: Tuesday, August 14, 2012

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML12207A110 - July 2012 Report on The Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206. (3 page(s), 8/13/2012)
    - ML12207A121 - ENCLOSURE: July 2012 Report on The Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206. (34 page(s), 8/14/2012)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### Mike Lukanik, Appellant, *v.*Mike Batovic, Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York comity clerk’s office on the 16th day of March, 1915, granting a motion to open default and to answer.

Per Curiam:

The order appealed from is modified by adding to the conditions to the opening of the default that the defendant file an undertaking within ten days after the service of the order to be entered hereon, for the payment of any judgment that the plaintiff may ultimately recover against him. If such undertaking be not given within the time fixed, the order appealed from will be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order modified as directed in opinion; if the condition therein stated be not complied with, order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Order to be settled on notice.