```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2557 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 151
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2557

                          [Report No. 108-265]

 To provide for the conservation and development of water and related 
resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct various 
 projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of the United States, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 23, 2003

    Mr. Young of Alaska (for himself and Mr. Duncan) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

                           September 5, 2003

           Additional sponsors: Mr. Oberstar and Mr. Costello

                           September 5, 2003

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
 [Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed 
                               in italic]
 [For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on June 
                               23, 2003]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the conservation and development of water and related 
resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct various 
 projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of the United States, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Water Resources 
Development Act of 2003''.
    (b) Table of Contents.--

Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
Sec. 2. Definition of secretary.

                   TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

Sec. 1001. Project authorizations.
Sec. 1002. Small projects for flood damage reduction.
Sec. 1003. Small projects for emergency streambank protection.
Sec. 1004. Small projects for navigation.
Sec. 1005. Small projects for improvement of the quality of the 
                            environment.
Sec. 1006. Small projects for aquatic ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 1007. Small projects for shoreline protection.
Sec. 1008. Small projects for snagging and sediment removal.

                      TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec. 2001. Annual passes for recreation.
Sec. 2002. Non-Federal contributions.
Sec. 2003. Harbor cost sharing.
Sec. 2004. Funding to process permits.
Sec. 2005. National shoreline erosion control development and 
                            demonstration program.
Sec. 2006. Written agreement for water resources projects.
Sec. 2007. Assistance for remediation, restoration, and reuse.
Sec. 2008. Compilation of laws.
Sec. 2009. Dredged material disposal.
Sec. 2010. Wetlands mitigation.
Sec. 2011. Remote and subsistence harbors.
Sec. 2012. Beneficial uses of dredged material.
Sec. 2013. Cost sharing provisions for certain areas.
Sec. 2014. Revision of project partnership agreement.
Sec. 2015. Cost sharing.
Sec. 2016. Credit for work performed before partnership agreement.
Sec. 2017. Recreation user fee revenues.
Sec. 2018. Expedited actions for emergency flood damage reduction.
Sec. 2019. Watershed and river basin assessments.
Sec. 2020. Tribal partnership program.
Sec. 2021. Treatment of certain separable elements.
Sec. 2022. Prosecution of work.
Sec. 2023. Wildfire firefighting.
Sec. 2024. Credit for nonconstruction services.
Sec. 2025. Technical assistance.
Sec. 2026. Centers of specialized planning expertise.
Sec. 2027. Coordination and scheduling of Federal, State, and local 
                            actions.
Sec. 2028. Project streamlining.
Sec. 2029. Lakes program.
Sec. 2030. Mitigation for fish and wildlife losses.
Sec. 2031. Cooperative agreements.
Sec. 2032. Project planning.
Sec. 2033. Independent peer review.

                 TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

Sec. 3001. Cook Inlet, Alaska.
Sec. 3002. King Cove Harbor, Alaska.
Sec. 3003. Sitka, Alaska.
Sec. 3004. Tatilek, Alaska.
Sec. 3005. Nogales Wash and tributaries, Arizona.
Sec. 3006. Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, Arkansas.
Sec. 3007. Saint Francis Basin, Arkansas.
Sec. 3008. American and Sacramento Rivers, California.
Sec. 3009. Cache Creek Basin, California.
Sec. 3010. Grayson Creek/Murderer's Creek, California.
Sec. 3011. John F. Baldwin Ship Channel and Stockton Ship Channel, 
                            California.
Sec. 3012. Los Angeles Harbor, Los Angeles, California.
Sec. 3013. Larkspur Ferry Channel, Larkspur, California.
Sec. 3014. Napa River Salt Marsh Restoration, Napa River, California.
Sec. 3015. Pacific Flyway Center, Sacramento, California.
Sec. 3016. Pinole Creek, California.
Sec. 3017. Prado Dam, California.
Sec. 3018. Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel, California.
Sec. 3019. Sacramento River, Glenn-Colusa, California.
Sec. 3020. San Lorenzo River, California.
Sec. 3021. Upper Guadalupe River, California.
Sec. 3022. Walnut Creek Channel, California.
Sec. 3023. Wildcat/San Pablo Creek Phase I, California.
Sec. 3024. Wildcat/San Pablo Creek Phase II, California.
Sec. 3025. Brevard County, Florida.
Sec. 3026. Broward County and Hillsboro Inlet, Florida.
Sec. 3027. Gasparilla and Estero Islands, Florida.
Sec. 3028. Lido Key Beach, Sarasota, Florida.
Sec. 3029. Manatee Harbor, Florida.
Sec. 3030. Tampa Harbor, Florida.
Sec. 3031. Tampa Harbor-Big Bend Channel, Florida.
Sec. 3032. Miami Harbor, Florida.
Sec. 3033. Little Wood River, Gooding, Idaho.
Sec. 3034. Hennepin-Hopper Lakes, Illinois.
Sec. 3035. Mississippi River and Big Muddy River, Illinois.
Sec. 3036. Spunky Bottoms, Illinois.
Sec. 3037. Emiquon, Illinois.
Sec. 3038. Little Calumet River, Indiana.
Sec. 3039. White River, Indiana.
Sec. 3040. Wolf Lake, Indiana.
Sec. 3041. Prestonsburg, Kentucky.
Sec. 3042. Amite River and tributaries, Louisiana, East Baton Rouge 
                            Parish Watershed.
Sec. 3043. Atchafalaya Basin, Louisiana.
Sec. 3044. Public access, Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, Louisiana.
Sec. 3045. J. Bennett Johnston Waterway, Mississippi River to 
                            Shreveport, Louisiana.
Sec. 3046. Mississippi Delta Region, Louisiana.
Sec. 3047. New Orleans to Venice, Louisiana.
Sec. 3048. West Bank of the Mississippi River (East of Harvey Canal), 
                            Louisiana.
Sec. 3049. Camp Ellis, Saco, Maine.
Sec. 3050. Union River, Maine.
Sec. 3051. Cass River, Spaulding Township, Michigan.
Sec. 3052. Detroit River Shoreline, Detroit, Michigan.
Sec. 3053. Water Resources Institute, Muskegon, Michigan.
Sec. 3054. Saginaw River, Bay City, Michigan.
Sec. 3055. Ada, Minnesota.
Sec. 3056. Duluth Harbor, McQuade Road, Minnesota.
Sec. 3057. Grand Portage Harbor, Minnesota.
Sec. 3058. Granite Falls, Minnesota.
Sec. 3059. Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Sec. 3060. Red Lake River, Minnesota.
Sec. 3061. Silver Bay, Minnesota.
Sec. 3062. Taconite Harbor, Minnesota.
Sec. 3063. Two Harbors, Minnesota.
Sec. 3064. Deer Island, Harrison County, Mississippi.
Sec. 3065. Bois Brule Drainage and Levee District, Missouri.
Sec. 3066. Sand Creek Watershed, Wahoo, Nebraska.
Sec. 3067. Alamogordo, New Mexico.
Sec. 3068. Orchard Beach, Bronx, New York.
Sec. 3069. Times Beach, Buffalo, New York.
Sec. 3070. Port of New York and New Jersey, New York and New Jersey.
Sec. 3071. New York State Canal System.
Sec. 3072. Arcadia Lake, Oklahoma.
Sec. 3073. Willamette River Temperature Control, McKenzie Subbasin, 
                            Oregon.
Sec. 3074. French Creek, Union City Dam, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 3075. Lackawanna River at Olyphant, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 3076. Lackawanna River at Scranton, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 3077. Raystown Lake, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 3078. Sheraden Park Stream and Chartiers Creek, Allegheny County, 
                            Pennsylvania.
Sec. 3079. Solomon's Creek, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 3080. South Central Pennsylvania.
Sec. 3081. Wyoming Valley, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 3082. Little Limestone Creek, Jonesborough, Tennessee.
Sec. 3083. Cedar Bayou, Texas.
Sec. 3084. Lake Kemp, Texas.
Sec. 3085. Lower Rio Grande Basin, Texas.
Sec. 3086. North Padre Island, Corpus Christi Bay, Texas.
Sec. 3087. Proctor Lake, Texas.
Sec. 3088. San Antonio Channel, San Antonio, Texas.
Sec. 3089. Elizabeth River, Chesapeake, Virginia.
Sec. 3090. Roanoke River Upper Basin, Virginia.
Sec. 3091. Blair and Sitcum Waterways, Tacoma Harbor, Washington.
Sec. 3092. Greenbrier River Basin, West Virginia.
Sec. 3093. Manitowoc Harbor, Wisconsin.
Sec. 3094. Mississippi River Headwaters Reservoirs.
Sec. 3095. Continuation of project authorizations.
Sec. 3096. Project reauthorizations.
Sec. 3097. Project deauthorizations.
Sec. 3098. Land conveyances.
Sec. 3099. Extinguishment of reversionary interests and use 
                            restrictions.
Sec. 3100. Land exchange, disposal and acquisition of lands, Allatoona 
                            Lake, Georgia.

                           TITLE IV--STUDIES

Sec. 4001. John Glenn Great Lakes basin program.
Sec. 4002. St. George Harbor, Alaska.
Sec. 4003. Susitna River, Alaska.
Sec. 4004. Searcy County, Arkansas.
Sec. 4005. Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway, Illinois, 
                            Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin.
Sec. 4006. Hamilton, California.
Sec. 4007. Oceanside, California.
Sec. 4008. Sacramento River, California.
Sec. 4009. San Francisco Bay, Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California.
Sec. 4010. Tybee Island, Georgia.
Sec. 4011. Calumet Harbor, Illinois.
Sec. 4012. Paducah, Kentucky.
Sec. 4013. Bastrop-Morehouse Parish, Louisiana.
Sec. 4014. West Feliciana Parish, Louisiana.
Sec. 4015. City of Mackinac Island, Michigan.
Sec. 4016. Chicago, Illinois.
Sec. 4017. South Branch, Chicago River, Chicago, Illinois.
Sec. 4018. Northeast Mississippi.
Sec. 4019. Pueblo of Zuni, New Mexico.
Sec. 4020. Hudson-Raritan Estuary, New York and New Jersey.
Sec. 4021. Sac and Fox Nation, Oklahoma.
Sec. 4022. Sutherlin, Oregon.
Sec. 4023. Tillamook Bay and Bar, Oregon.
Sec. 4024. Ecosystem restoration and fish passage improvements, Oregon.
Sec. 4025. Northeastern Pennsylvania aquatic ecosystem restoration and 
                            protection.
Sec. 4026. Georgetown and Williamsburg Counties, South Carolina.
Sec. 4027. Sabine Pass to Galveston Bay, Texas.
Sec. 4028. Grand County and Moab, Utah.
Sec. 4029. Chehalis River Basin, Washington.
Sec. 4030. Sprague, Lincoln County, Washington.
Sec. 4031. Monongahela River Basin, Northern West Virginia.
Sec. 4032. Wauwatosa, Wisconsin.

                   TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

Sec. 5001. Maintenance of navigation channels.
Sec. 5002. Watershed management.
Sec. 5003. Dam safety.
Sec. 5004. Structural integrity evaluations.
Sec. 5005. Flood mitigation priority areas.
Sec. 5006. Additional assistance for authorized projects.
Sec. 5007. Expedited completion of reports and construction for certain 
                            projects.
Sec. 5008. Expedited completion of reports for certain projects.
Sec. 5009. Southeastern water resources assessment.
Sec. 5010. Upper Mississippi River environmental management program.
Sec. 5011. Missouri and Middle Mississippi Rivers enhancement project.
Sec. 5012. Membership of Missouri River Trust.
Sec. 5013. Great Lakes fishery and ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 5014. Susquehanna, Delaware, and Potomac River basins.
Sec. 5015. Chesapeake Bay environmental restoration and protection 
                            program.
Sec. 5016. Montgomery, Alabama.
Sec. 5017. Pinhook Creek, Huntsville, Alabama.
Sec. 5018. Alaska.
Sec. 5019. Akutan Small Boat Harbor, Alaska.
Sec. 5020. Lowell Creek Tunnel, Seward, Alaska.
Sec. 5021. St. Herman and St. Paul Harbors, Kodiak, Alaska.
Sec. 5022. Augusta and Clarendon, Arkansas.
Sec. 5023. Loomis Landing, Arkansas.
Sec. 5024. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River navigation project, Arkansas 
                            and Oklahoma.
Sec. 5025. St. Francis River Basin, Arkansas and Missouri.
Sec. 5026. Cambria, California.
Sec. 5027. Contra Costa Canal, Oakley and Knightsen, California; 
                            Mallard Slough, Pittsburg, California.
Sec. 5028. East San Joaquin County, California.
Sec. 5029. Sacramento Area, California.
Sec. 5030. Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel, California.
Sec. 5031. San Francisco, California.
Sec. 5032. San Francisco, California, waterfront area.
Sec. 5033. Stockton, California.
Sec. 5034. Charles Hervey Townshend Breakwater, Connecticut.
Sec. 5035. Everglades restoration, Florida.
Sec. 5036. Florida Keys water quality improvements.
Sec. 5037. Lake Worth, Florida.
Sec. 5038. Lake Lanier, Georgia.
Sec. 5039. Riley Creek recreation area, Idaho.
Sec. 5040. Reconstruction of Illinois flood protection projects.
Sec. 5041. Kaskaskia River basin, Illinois, restoration.
Sec. 5042. Natalie Creek, Midlothian and Oak Forest, Illinois.
Sec. 5043. Peoria riverfront development, Peoria, Illinois.
Sec. 5044. Illinois River basin restoration.
Sec. 5045. Calumet region, Indiana.
Sec. 5046. Rathbun Lake, Iowa.
Sec. 5047. Cumberland River Basin, Kentucky.
Sec. 5048. Mayfield Creek and tributaries, Kentucky.
Sec. 5049. North Fork, Kentucky River, Breathitt County, Kentucky.
Sec. 5050. Southern and Eastern Kentucky.
Sec. 5051. Coastal Louisiana ecosystem protection and restoration.
Sec. 5052. Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
Sec. 5053. West Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana.
Sec. 5054. Chesapeake Bay shoreline, Maryland, Virginia, Pennsylvania, 
                            and Delaware.
Sec. 5055. Delmarva conservation corridor, Maryland.
Sec. 5056. Detroit River, Michigan.
Sec. 5057. Oakland County, Michigan.
Sec. 5058. St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair, Michigan.
Sec. 5059. Garrison and Kathio Township, Minnesota.
Sec. 5060. Northeastern Minnesota.
Sec. 5061. Desoto County, Mississippi.
Sec. 5062. Harrison, Hancock, and Jackson Counties, Mississippi.
Sec. 5063. Mississippi River, Missouri, and Illinois.
Sec. 5064. St. Louis, Missouri.
Sec. 5065. Hackensack Meadowlands area, New Jersey.
Sec. 5066. Atlantic Coast of New York.
Sec. 5067. College Point, New York City, New York.
Sec. 5068. Flushing Bay and Creek, New York City, New York.
Sec. 5069. Little Neck Bay, Village of Kings Point, New York.
Sec. 5070. Onondaga Lake, New York.
Sec. 5071. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, North Carolina.
Sec. 5072. Stanly County, North Carolina.
Sec. 5073. Central Riverfront Park, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Sec. 5074. Piedmont Lake Dam, Ohio.
Sec. 5075. Ohio.
Sec. 5076. Waurika Lake, Oklahoma.
Sec. 5077. Columbia River, Oregon.
Sec. 5078. Eugene, Oregon.
Sec. 5079. John Day Lock and Dam, Lake Umatilla, Oregon and Washington.
Sec. 5080. Lowell, Oregon.
Sec. 5081. Hagerman's Run, Williamsport, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 5082. Northeast Pennsylvania.
Sec. 5083. Susquehannock Campground access road, Raystown Lake, 
                            Pennsylvania.
Sec. 5084. Upper Susquehanna River basin, Pennsylvania and New York.
Sec. 5085. Washington, Greene, Westmoreland, and Fayette Counties, 
                            Pennsylvania.
Sec. 5086. Cano Martin Pena, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Sec. 5087. Beaufort and Jasper Counties, South Carolina.
Sec. 5088. Cooper River, South Carolina.
Sec. 5089. Lakes Marion and Moultrie, South Carolina.
Sec. 5090. Upper Big Sioux River, Watertown, South Dakota.
Sec. 5091. Fritz Landing, Tennessee.
Sec. 5092. Memphis, Tennessee.
Sec. 5093. Town Creek, Lenoir City, Tennessee.
Sec. 5094. Tennessee River partnership.
Sec. 5095. Clear Creek and tributaries, Harris, Galveston, and Brazoria 
                            Counties, Texas.
Sec. 5096. Harris County, Texas.
Sec. 5097. Harris Gully, Harris County, Texas.
Sec. 5098. Onion Creek, Texas.
Sec. 5099. Pelican Island, Texas.
Sec. 5100. Front Royal, Virginia.
Sec. 5101. Richmond National Battlefield Park, Richmond, Virginia.
Sec. 5102. Baker Bay and Ilwaco Harbor, Washington.
Sec. 5103. Chehalis River, Centralia, Washington.
Sec. 5104. Hamilton Island Campground, Washington.
Sec. 5105. Puget Island, Washington.
Sec. 5106. Bluestone, West Virginia.
Sec. 5107. West Virginia and Pennsylvania flood control.
Sec. 5108. Lower Kanawha River Basin, West Virginia.
Sec. 5109. Central West Virginia.
Sec. 5110. Southern West Virginia.
Sec. 5111. Construction of flood control projects by non-Federal 
                            interests.
Sec. 5112. Bridge authorization.
Sec. 5113. Additional assistance for critical projects.
Sec. 5114. Use of Federal hopper dredge fleet.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF SECRETARY.

    In this Act, the term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of the 
Army.

                   TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

SEC. 1001. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.

    Except as otherwise provided in this section, the following 
projects for water resources development and conservation and other 
purposes are authorized to be carried out by the Secretary 
substantially in accordance with the plans, and subject to the 
conditions, described in the respective reports designated in this 
section:
            (1) American river watershed, california.--The project for 
        flood damage reduction and environmental restoration, American 
        River Watershed, California: Report of the Chief of Engineers, 
        dated November 5, 2002, at a total cost of $257,300,000, with 
        an estimated Federal cost of $201,200,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $56,100,000; except that the Secretary is 
        authorized to accept funds from State and local governments and 
        other Federal agencies for the purpose of constructing a 
        permanent bridge instead of the temporary bridge described in 
        the recommended plan and may construct such permanent bridge if 
        all additional costs for such bridge, above the $36,000,000 
        provided for in the recommended plan for bridge construction, 
        are provided by such governments or agencies.
            (2) Pine flat dam and reservoir, california.--The project 
        for environmental restoration, Pine Flat Dam and Reservoir, 
        Fresno County, California: Report of the Chief of Engineers, 
        dated July 19, 2002, at a total cost of $38,480,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $24,930,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $13,550,000.
            (3) South platte river, denver, colorado.--The project for 
        environmental restoration Denver County Reach, South Platte 
        River, Denver, Colorado: Report of the Chief of Engineers, 
        dated May 16, 2003, at a total cost of $17,997,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $11,698,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $6,299,000.
            (4) Morganza to the gulf of mexico, louisiana.--
                    (A) In general.--The project for hurricane and 
                storm damage reduction, Morganza to the Gulf of Mexico, 
                Louisiana: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated 
                August 23, 2002, at a total cost of $719,000,000, with 
                an estimated Federal cost of $467,000,000 and an 
                estimated non-Federal cost of $252,000,000.
                    (B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the 
                non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost 
                of work carried out by the non-Federal interest for 
                interim flood protection after March 31, 1989, if the 
                Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
                project.
            (5) Smith island, maryland.--The project for environmental 
        restoration and protection, Smith Island, Maryland: Report of 
        the Chief of Engineers, dated October 29, 2001, at a total cost 
        of $8,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $5,200,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $2,800,000.
            (6) Corpus christi ship channel, corpus christi, texas.--
        The project for navigation and environmental restoration, 
        Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Texas, Channel Improvement 
        Project: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated June 2, 2003, 
        at a total cost of $153,808,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
        of $73,554,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $80,254,000.
            (7) Matagorda bay, texas.--The project for navigation, Gulf 
        Intracoastal Waterway, Brazos River to Port O'Connor, Matagorda 
        Bay Re-Route, Texas: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated 
        December 4, 2002, at a total cost of $14,515,000. The costs of 
        construction of the project are to be paid \1/2\ from amounts 
        appropriated from the general fund of the Treasury and \1/2\ 
        from amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund.
            (8) Riverside oxbow, fort worth, texas.--
                    (A) In general.--The project for environmental 
                restoration, Riverside Oxbow, Fort Worth, Texas: Report 
                of the Chief of Engineers dated May 29, 2003, at a 
                total cost of $22,200,000, with an estimated Federal 
                cost of $9,180,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
                $13,020,000.
                    (B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the 
                non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost 
                of design and construction work carried out on the 
                Beach Street Dam and associated features by the non-
                Federal interest before the date of the partnership 
                agreement for the project if the Secretary determines 
                that the work is integral to the project.
            (9) Deep creek, chesapeake, virginia.--The project for the 
        Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Bridge Replacement, Deep Creek, 
        Chesapeake, Virginia: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated 
        March 3, 2003, at a total cost of $22,178,000.

SEC. 1002. SMALL PROJECTS FOR FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of 
the following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project 
is feasible, may carry out the project under section 205 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s):
            (1) Cache river basin, grubbs, arkansas.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Cache River basin, Grubbs, Arkansas.
            (2) Santa ana river basin and orange county streams, 
        california.--Project for flood damage reduction, Santa Ana 
        River basin and Orange County streams, California.
            (3) Stony creek, oak lawn, illinois.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Stony Creek, Oak Lawn, Illinois.
            (4) Olive hill and vicinity, kentucky.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Olive Hill and vicinity, Kentucky.
            (5) Nashua river, fitchburg, massachusetts.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, Nashua River, Fitchburg, Massachusetts.
            (6) Saginaw river, hamilton dam, flint, michigan.--Project 
        for flood damage reduction, Saginaw River, Hamilton Dam, Flint, 
        Michigan.
            (7) Marsh creek, minnesota.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Marsh Creek, Minnesota.
            (8) Roseau river, roseau, minnesota.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Roseau River, Roseau, Minnesota.
            (9) South branch of the wild rice river, borup, 
        minnesota.--Project for flood damage reduction, South Branch of 
        the Wild Rice River, Borup, Minnesota.
            (10) Twin valley lake, wild rice river, minnesota.--Project 
        for flood damage reduction, Twin Valley Lake, Wild Rice River, 
        Minnesota.
            (11) Blacksnake creek, st. joseph, missouri.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, Blacksnake Creek, St. Joseph, Missouri.
            (12) McKeel brook, new jersey.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, McKeel Brook, New Jersey.
            (13) East river, silver beach, new york city, new york.--
        Project for flood damage reduction, East River, Silver Beach, 
        New York City, New York.
            (14) Ramapo river, town of monroe and villages of monroe, 
        kiryas joel, and harriman, new york.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Ramapo River, Town of Monroe and Villages of Monroe, 
        Kiryas Joel, and Harriman, New York.
            (15) Little mill creek, southampton, pennsylvania.--Project 
        for flood damage reduction, Little Mill Creek, Southampton, 
        Pennsylvania.
            (16) Little neshaminy creek, warrenton, pennsylvania.--
        Project for flood damage reduction, Little Neshaminy Creek, 
        Warrenton, Pennsylvania.
            (17) Surfside beach, south carolina.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Surfside Beach and vicinity, South Carolina.
    (b) Special Rules.--In carrying out the project for flood damage 
reduction, South Branch of the Wild Rice River, Borup, Minnesota, 
referred to in subsection (a)(9) the Secretary may consider national 
ecosystem restoration benefits in determining the Federal interest in 
the project and shall allow the non-Federal interest to participate in 
the financing of the project in accordance with section 903(c) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) to the extent 
that the Secretary's evaluation indicates that applying such section is 
necessary to implement the project.

SEC. 1003. SMALL PROJECTS FOR EMERGENCY STREAMBANK PROTECTION.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is feasible, 
may carry out the project under section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 
1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r):
            (1) Ouachita and black rivers, arkansas.--Project for 
        emergency streambank protection, Ouachita and Black Rivers, 
        Arkansas.
            (2) Melvina ditch, chicago ridge, illinois.--Project for 
        emergency streambank protection for the east side of Melvina 
        Ditch in the vicinity of 96th Street and Nashville Avenue, 
        Chicago Ridge, Illinois.
            (3) Middle fork grand river, gentry county, missouri.--
        Project for emergency streambank protection, Middle Fork Grand 
        River, Gentry County, Missouri.
            (4) Shrewsbury river, rumson, new jersey.--Project for 
        emergency streambank protection, Shrewsbury River, Rumson, New 
        Jersey.
            (5) Kowawese unique area and hudson river, new windsor, new 
        york.--Project for emergency streambank protection, Kowawese 
        Unique Area and Hudson River, New Windsor, New York.

SEC. 1004. SMALL PROJECTS FOR NAVIGATION.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is feasible, 
may carry out the project under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act 
of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577):
            (1) Blytheville county harbor, arkansas.--Project for 
        navigation, Blytheville County Harbor, Arkansas.
            (2) Evanston, illinois.--Project for navigation, Evanston, 
        Illinois.
            (3) Niagara frontier transportation authority boat harbor, 
        buffalo, new york.--Project for navigation, Niagara Frontier 
        Transportation Authority Boat Harbor, Buffalo, New York.
            (4) Woodlawn marina, lackawanna, new york.--Project for 
        navigation, Woodlawn Marina, Lackawanna, New York.
            (5) Baker bay and ilwaco harbor, washington.--Project for 
        navigation, Baker Bay and Ilwaco Harbor, Washington.

SEC. 1005. SMALL PROJECTS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE QUALITY OF THE 
              ENVIRONMENT.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for the following project and, 
if the Secretary determines that the project is appropriate, may carry 
out the project under section 1135 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a): Project for improvement of the quality 
of the environment, Smithville Lake, Missouri.

SEC. 1006. SMALL PROJECTS FOR AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is 
appropriate, may carry out the project under section 206 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330):
            (1) Colorado river, yuma, arizona.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Colorado River, Yuma, Arizona.
            (2) Chino valley, california.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Chino Valley, California.
            (3) New and alamo rivers, imperial county, california.--
        Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, New and Alamo 
        Rivers, Imperial County, California, including efforts to 
        address invasive aquatic plant species.
            (4) San diego river, california.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, San Diego River, California, including 
        efforts to address invasive aquatic plant species.
            (5) Stockton deep water ship channel and lower san joaquin 
        river, california.--Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, 
        Stockton Deep Water Ship Channel and lower San Joaquin River, 
California.
            (6) Sweetwater reservoir, san diego county, california.--
        Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Sweetwater 
        Reservoir, San Diego County, California, including efforts to 
        address invasive aquatic plant species.
            (7) Biscayne bay, florida.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration, Biscayne Bay, Key Biscayne, Florida.
            (8) Destin harbor, florida.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration, Destin Harbor, Florida.
            (9) Chattahoochee river, columbus, georgia, and phenix 
        city, alabama.--Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, City 
        Mills Dam and Eagle and Phenix Dam, Chattahoochee River, 
        Columbus, Georgia, and Phenix City, Alabama.
            (10) Chattahoochee river and ocmulgee river basins, 
        georgia.--Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, 
        Chattahoochee River and Ocmulgee River basins, Gwinnett County, 
        Georgia.
            (11) Snake river, jerome, idaho.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Snake River, Jerome, Idaho.

SEC. 1007. SMALL PROJECTS FOR SHORELINE PROTECTION.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for the following project and, 
if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible, may carry out 
the project under section 3 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing 
Federal participation in the cost of protecting the shores of publicly 
owned property'', approved August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426g): Project 
for shoreline protection, Nelson Lagoon, Alaska.

SEC. 1008. SMALL PROJECTS FOR SNAGGING AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for the following project and, 
if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible, the Secretary 
may carry out the project under section 2 of the Flood Control Act of 
August 28, 1937 (33 U.S.C. 701g): Project for removal of snags and 
clearing and straightening of channels for flood control, Kowawese 
Unique Area and Hudson River, New Windsor, New York.

                      TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS

SEC. 2001. ANNUAL PASSES FOR RECREATION.

    Section 208(c)(4) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(16 U.S.C. 460d-3 note; 110 Stat. 3681; 113 Stat. 294) is amended by 
striking ``the December 31, 2003'' and inserting ``December 31, 2004''.

SEC. 2002. NON-FEDERAL CONTRIBUTIONS.

    Section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2213) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(n) Non-Federal Contributions.--
            ``(1) Prohibition on solicitation of excess 
        contributions.--The Secretary may not solicit contributions 
        from non-Federal interests for costs of constructing authorized 
        water resources development projects or measures in excess of 
        the non-Federal share assigned to the appropriate project 
        purposes listed in subsections (a), (b), and (c) or condition 
        Federal participation in such projects or measures on the 
        receipt of such contributions.
            ``(2) Limitation on statutory construction.--Nothing in 
        this subsection shall be construed to affect the Secretary's 
        authority under section 903(c) of this Act.''.

SEC. 2003. HARBOR COST SHARING.

    (a) Payments During Construction.--Section 101(a)(1) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211(a)(1); 100 Stat. 
4082) is amended in each of subparagraphs (B) and (C) by striking ``45 
feet'' and inserting ``53 feet''.
    (b) Operation and Maintenance.--Section 101(b)(1) of such Act (33 
U.S.C. 2211(b)(1)) is amended by striking ``45 feet'' and inserting 
``53 feet''.
    (c) Definitions.--Section 214 of such Act (33 U.S.C. 2241; 100 
Stat. 4108) is amended in each of paragraphs (1) and (3) by striking 
``45 feet'' and inserting ``53 feet''.
    (d) Applicability.--The amendments made by subsections (a), (b), 
and (c) shall apply only to a project, or separable element of a 
project, on which a contract for physical construction has not been 
awarded before the date of enactment of this Act.

SEC. 2004. FUNDING TO PROCESS PERMITS.

    Section 214(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (33 
U.S.C. 2201 note; 114 Stat. 2594) is amended by striking ``2003'' and 
inserting ``2005''.

SEC. 2005. NATIONAL SHORELINE EROSION CONTROL DEVELOPMENT AND 
              DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM.

    (a) Extension of Program.--Section 5(a) of the Act entitled ``An 
Act authorizing Federal participation in the cost of protecting the 
shores of publicly owned property'', approved August 13, 1946 (33 
U.S.C. 426h(a)), is amended by striking ``6 years'' and inserting ``10 
years''.
    (b) Extension of Planning, Design, and Construction Phase.--Section 
5(b)(1)(A) of such Act (33 U.S.C. 426h(b)(1)(A)) is amended by striking 
``3 years'' and inserting ``6 years''.
    (c) Cost-Sharing; Removal of Projects.--Section 5(b) of such Act 
(33 U.S.C. 426h(b)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as paragraphs 
        (5) and (6), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following:
            ``(3) Cost sharing.--The Secretary may enter into a cost-
        sharing agreement with a non-Federal interest to carry out a 
        project, or a phase of a project, under the erosion control 
        program in cooperation with the non-Federal interest.
            ``(4) Removal of projects.--The Secretary may pay all or a 
        portion of the costs of removing a project, or an element of a 
        project, constructed under the erosion control program if the 
        Secretary determines during the term of the program that the 
        project or element is detrimental to the environment, private 
        property, or public safety.''.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 5(e)(2) of such Act 
(33 U.S.C. 426h(e)(2)) is amended by striking ``$21,000,000'' and 
inserting ``$31,000,000''.

SEC. 2006. WRITTEN AGREEMENT FOR WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS.

    (a) Partnership Agreements.--Section 221 of the Flood Control Act 
of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``under the provisions'' and all 
                that follows through ``under any other'' and inserting 
                ``under any'';
                    (B) by inserting ``partnership'' after ``written'';
                    (C) by striking ``Secretary of the Army to furnish 
                its required cooperation for'' and inserting ``district 
                engineer for the district in which the project will be 
                carried out under which each party agrees to carry out 
                its responsibilities and requirements for 
                implementation or construction of''; and
                    (D) by inserting after ``$25,000.'' the following: 
                ``Such agreement may include a provision for liquidated 
                damages in the event of a failure of one or more 
                parties to perform.'';
            (2) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f); and
            (3) by inserting after subsection (d) the following:
    ``(e) Limitation.--Nothing in subsection (a) shall be construed as 
limiting the authority of the Secretary to ensure that a partnership 
agreement meets all requirements of law and policies of the Secretary 
in effect on the date of entry into the partnership agreement.''.
    (b) Local Cooperation.--Section 912(b) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (101 Stat. 4190) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) by striking ``shall'' the first place it 
                appears and inserting ``may''; and
                    (B) by striking the last sentence; and
            (2) in paragraph (4)--
                    (A) by inserting after ``injunction, for'' the 
                following: ``payment of liquidated damages or, for'';
                    (B) by striking ``to collect a civil penalty 
                imposed under this section,''; and
                    (C) by striking ``any civil penalty imposed under 
                this section,'' and inserting ``any liquidated 
                damages,''.
    (c) Applicability.--The amendments made by subsections (a) and (b) 
only apply to partnership agreements entered into after the date of 
enactment of this Act; except that at the request of a non-Federal 
interest for a project the district engineer for the district in which 
the project is located may amend a project partnership agreement 
entered into on or before such date and under which construction on the 
project has not been initiated as of such date of enactment for the 
purpose of incorporating such amendments.
    (d) References.--
            (1) To cooperation agreements.--Any reference in a law, 
        regulation, document, or other paper of the United States to a 
        cooperation agreement or project cooperation agreement shall be 
        treated to be a reference to a partnership agreement or a 
        project partnership agreement, respectively.
            (2) To partnership agreements.--Any reference to a 
        partnership agreement or project partnership agreement in this 
        Act (other than this section) shall be treated as a reference 
        to a cooperation agreement or a project cooperation agreement, 
        respectively.

SEC. 2007. ASSISTANCE FOR REMEDIATION, RESTORATION, AND REUSE.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may provide to State and local 
governments assessment, planning, and design assistance for 
remediation, environmental restoration, or reuse of areas located 
within the boundaries of such State or local governments where such 
remediation, environmental restoration, or reuse will contribute to the 
improvement of water quality or the conservation of water and related 
resources of drainage basins and watersheds within the United States.
    (b) Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
assistance provided under subsection (a) shall be 50 percent.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $30,000,000 for each of fiscal 
years 2004 through 2008.

SEC. 2008. COMPILATION OF LAWS.

    Within one year after the date of enactment of this Act, the laws 
of the United States relating to the improvement of rivers and harbors, 
flood control, beach erosion, and other water resources development 
enacted after November 8, 1966, and before January 1, 2004, shall be 
compiled under the direction of the Secretary and the Chief of 
Engineers and printed for the use of the Department of the Army, 
Congress, and the general public. The Secretary shall reprint the 
volumes containing such laws enacted before November 8, 1966. In 
addition, the Secretary shall include an index in each volume so 
compiled or reprinted. Not later than December 1, 2004, the Secretary 
shall transmit at least 25 copies of each such volume to the Committee 
on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives 
and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate.

SEC. 2009. DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL.

    Section 217 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
U.S.C. 2326a; 110 Stat. 3694-3696) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d);
            (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following:
    ``(c) Governmental Partnerships.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary may enter into cost-
        sharing agreements with 1 or more non-Federal public interests 
        with respect to a project, or group of projects within a 
        geographic region if appropriate, for the acquisition, design, 
        construction, management, or operation of a dredged material 
        processing, treatment, contaminant reduction, or disposal 
        facility (including any facility used to demonstrate potential 
        beneficial uses of dredged material, which may include 
        effective sediment contaminant reduction technologies) using 
        funds provided in whole or in part by the Federal Government. 
        One or more of the parties of the agreement may perform the 
        acquisition, design, construction, management, or operation of 
        a dredged material processing, treatment, or disposal facility. 
If appropriate, the Secretary may combine portions of separate 
construction or maintenance appropriations from separate Federal 
projects with the appropriate combined cost-sharing between the various 
projects when the facility serves to manage dredged material from 
multiple Federal projects located in the geographic region of the 
facility.
            ``(2) Public financing.--
                    ``(A) Agreements.--
                            ``(i) Specified federal funding sources and 
                        cost sharing.--The cost-sharing agreement used 
                        shall clearly specify the Federal funding 
                        sources and combined cost-sharing when 
                        applicable to multiple Federal navigation 
                        projects and the responsibilities and risks of 
                        each of the parties related to present and 
                        future dredged material managed by the 
                        facility.
                            ``(ii) Management of sediments.--The cost-
                        sharing agreement may include the management of 
                        sediments from the maintenance dredging of 
                        Federal navigation projects that do not have 
                        partnership agreements. The cost-sharing 
                        agreement may allow the non-Federal sponsor to 
                        receive reimbursable payments from the Federal 
                        Government for commitments made by the sponsor 
                        for disposal or placement capacity at dredged 
                        material treatment, processing, contaminant 
                        reduction, or disposal facilities.
                            ``(iii) Credit.--The cost-sharing agreement 
                        may allow costs incurred prior to execution of 
                        a partnership agreement for construction or the 
                        purchase of equipment or capacity for the 
                        project to be credited according to existing 
                        cost-sharing rules.
                    ``(B) Credit.--Nothing in this subsection 
                supersedes or modifies existing agreements between the 
                Federal Government and any non-Federal sponsors for the 
                cost-sharing, construction, and operation and 
                maintenance of Federal navigation projects. Subject to 
                the approval of the Secretary and in accordance with 
                existing laws, regulations, and policies, a non-Federal 
                public sponsor of a Federal navigation project may seek 
                credit for funds provided in the acquisition, design, 
                construction, management, or operation of a dredged 
                material processing, treatment, or disposal facility to 
                the extent the facility is used to manage dredged 
                material from the Federal navigation project. The non-
                Federal sponsor shall be responsible for providing all 
                necessary lands, easements, rights-of-way, or 
                relocations associated with the facility and shall 
                receive credit for these items.''; and
            (3) in each of subsections (d)(1) and (d)(2)(A), as so 
        redesignated--
                    (A) by inserting ``and maintenance'' after 
                ``operation''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``processing, treatment, or'' 
                after ``dredged material'' the first place it appears.

SEC. 2010. WETLANDS MITIGATION.

    In carrying out a water resources project that involves wetlands 
mitigation and that has impacts that occur within the service area of a 
mitigation bank, the Secretary, to the maximum extent practicable and 
where appropriate, shall give preference to the use of the mitigation 
bank if the bank contains sufficient available credits to offset the 
impact and the bank is approved in accordance with the Federal Guidance 
for the Establishment, Use and Operation of Mitigation Banks (60 Fed. 
Reg. 58605) or other applicable Federal law (including regulations).

SEC. 2011. REMOTE AND SUBSISTENCE HARBORS.

    (a) In General.--In conducting a study of harbor and navigation 
improvements, the Secretary may recommend a project without the need to 
demonstrate that the project is justified solely by national economic 
development benefits if the Secretary determines that--
            (1)(A) the community to be served by the project is at 
        least 70 miles from the nearest surface accessible commercial 
        port and has no direct rail or highway link to another 
        community served by a surface accessible port or harbor; or
            (B) the project would be located in the Commonwealth of 
        Puerto Rico, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana 
        Islands, or American Samoa;
            (2) the harbor is economically critical such that over 80 
        percent of the goods transported through the harbor would be 
        consumed within the community served by the harbor and 
        navigation improvement; and
            (3) the long-term viability of the community would be 
        threatened without the harbor and navigation improvement.
    (b) Justification.--In considering whether to recommend a project 
under subsection (a), the Secretary shall consider the benefits of the 
project to--
            (1) public health and safety of the local community, 
        including access to facilities designed to protect public 
        health and safety;
            (2) access to natural resources for subsistence purposes;
            (3) local and regional economic opportunities;
            (4) welfare of the local population; and
            (5) social and cultural value to the community.

SEC. 2012. BENEFICIAL USES OF DREDGED MATERIAL.

    (a) In General.--Section 204 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326) is amended by striking subsections (c) through 
(g) and inserting the following:
    ``(c) In General.--The Secretary may carry out projects to 
transport and place suitable material dredged in connection with the 
construction, operation, or maintenance of an authorized navigation 
project at locations selected by a non-Federal entity for use in the 
construction, repair, or rehabilitation of projects determined by the 
Secretary to be in the public interest and associated with navigation, 
flood damage reduction, hydroelectric power, municipal and industrial 
water supply, agricultural water supply, recreation, hurricane and 
storm damage reduction, aquatic plant control, and environmental 
protection and restoration.
    ``(d) Cooperative Agreement.--Any project undertaken pursuant to 
this section shall be initiated only after non-Federal interests have 
entered into an agreement with the Secretary in which the non-Federal 
interests agree to pay the non-Federal share of the cost of 
construction of the project and 100 percent of the cost of operation, 
maintenance, replacement, and rehabilitation of the project in 
accordance with section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213).
    ``(e) Special Rule.--Construction of a project under subsection (a) 
for the protection and restoration of aquatic and ecologically related 
habitat the cost of which does not exceed $750,000 and which will be 
located in a disadvantaged community as determined by the Secretary may 
be carried out at Federal expense.
    ``(f) Determination of Construction Costs.--Costs associated with 
construction of a project under this section shall be limited solely to 
construction costs that are in excess of those costs necessary to carry 
out the dredging for construction, operation, or maintenance of the 
authorized navigation project in the most cost effective way, 
consistent with economic, engineering, and environmental criteria.
    ``(g) Selection of Dredged Material Disposal Method.--In developing 
and carrying out a project for navigation involving the disposal of 
dredged material, the Secretary may select, with the consent of the 
non-Federal interest, a disposal method that is not the least-cost 
option if the Secretary determines that the incremental costs of such 
disposal method are reasonable in relation to the environmental 
benefits, including the benefits to the aquatic environment to be 
derived from the creation of wetlands and control of shoreline erosion. 
The Federal share of such incremental costs shall be determined in 
accordance with subsection (d).
    ``(h) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), for any project carried out 
under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a nonprofit 
entity, with the consent of the affected local government.
    ``(i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $30,000,000 annually for projects under this section of 
which not more than $3,000,000 annually may be used for construction of 
projects described in subsection (e). Such sums shall remain available 
until expended.
    ``(j) Regional Sediment Management Planning.--In consultation with 
appropriate State and Federal agencies, the Secretary may develop, at 
Federal expense, plans for regional management of material dredged in 
conjunction with the construction, operation, or maintenance of 
navigation projects, including potential beneficial uses of dredged 
material for construction, repair, or rehabilitation of public projects 
for navigation, flood damage reduction, hydroelectric power, municipal 
and industrial water supply, agricultural water supply, recreation, 
hurricane and storm damage reduction, aquatic plant control, and 
environmental protection and restoration.''.
    (b) Repeal.--
            (1) In general.--Section 145 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1976 (33 U.S.C. 426j) is repealed.
            (2) Hold harmless.--The repeal made by paragraph (1) shall 
        not affect the authority of the Secretary to complete any 
        project being carried out under such section 145 on the day 
        before the date of enactment of this Act.
    (c) Priority Areas.--In carrying out section 204 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326), the Secretary shall 
give priority to a project for the beaches of Bogues Bank in the 
vicinity of Morehead City, North Carolina, and a project in the 
vicinity of the Smith Point Park Pavilion and the TWA Flight 800 
Memorial, Brookhaven, New York.

SEC. 2013. COST SHARING PROVISIONS FOR CERTAIN AREAS.

    Section 1156 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2310; 100 Stat. 4256) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 1156. COST SHARING PROVISIONS FOR CERTAIN AREAS.

    ``The Secretary shall waive local cost-sharing requirements up to 
$500,000 for all studies and projects in the Commonwealth of Puerto 
Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana 
Islands, and the United States Virgin Islands, in Indian country (as 
defined in section 1151 of title 18, United States Code, and including 
lands that are within the jurisdictional area of an Oklahoma Indian 
tribe, as determined by the Secretary of the Interior, and are 
recognized by the Secretary of the Interior as eligible for trust land 
status under part 151 of title 25, Code of Federal Regulations) or on 
land in the State of Alaska conveyed to an Alaska Native Village 
Corporation under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 
1601 et seq.).''.

SEC. 2014. REVISION OF PROJECT PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT.

    Upon authorization by law of an increase in the maximum amount of 
Federal funds that may be allocated for a project or an increase in the 
total cost of a project authorized to be carried out by the Secretary, 
the Secretary shall revise the project partnership agreement for the 
project to take into account the change in Federal participation in the 
project.

SEC. 2015. COST SHARING.

    An increase in the maximum amount of Federal funds that may be 
allocated for a project or an increase in the total cost of a project 
authorized to be carried out by the Secretary shall not affect any cost 
sharing requirement applicable to the project under title I of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211 et seq.).

SEC. 2016. CREDIT FOR WORK PERFORMED BEFORE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT.

    If the Secretary is authorized to credit toward the non-Federal 
share the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal interest before 
the date of the partnership agreement for the project and such work has 
not been carried out as of the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary shall enter into an agreement with the non-Federal interest 
for the project under which the non-Federal interest shall carry out 
such work, and the credit shall apply only to work carried out under 
the agreement.

SEC. 2017. RECREATION USER FEE REVENUES.

    Section 225 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 297-298) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1) by striking ``During fiscal years 
        1999 through 2002, the'' and inserting ``The''; and
            (2) in subsection (a)(3) by striking ``September 30, 2005'' 
        and inserting ``expended''.

SEC. 2018. EXPEDITED ACTIONS FOR EMERGENCY FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION.

    The Secretary shall expedite any authorized planning, design, and 
construction of any project for flood damage reduction for an area 
that, within the preceding 5 years, has been subject to flooding that 
resulted in the loss of life and caused damage of sufficient severity 
and magnitude to warrant a declaration of a major disaster by the 
President under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster and Emergency Relief 
Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.).

SEC. 2019. WATERSHED AND RIVER BASIN ASSESSMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 729 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2267a; 114 Stat. 2587-2588; 100 Stat. 4164) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (d)--
                    (A) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph 
                (4);
                    (B) by striking the period at the end of paragraph 
                (5) and inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(6) Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California.'';
            (2) by striking paragraph (1) of subsection (f) and 
        inserting the following:
            ``(1) Non-federal share.--The non-Federal share of the 
        costs of an assessment carried out under this section on or 
        after December 11, 2000, shall be 25 percent.''; and
            (3) by striking subsection (g).
    (b) Revision of Partnership Agreement.--The Secretary shall revise 
the partnership agreement for any assessment being carried out under 
such section 729 to take into account the change in non-Federal 
participation in the assessment as a result of the amendments made by 
subsection (a).

SEC. 2020. TRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM.

    Section 203(b)(1)(B) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(33 U.S.C. 2269(b)(1)(B); 114 Stat. 2589) is amended by inserting after 
``Code'' the following ``, and including lands that are within the 
jurisdictional area of an Oklahoma Indian tribe, as determined by the 
Secretary of the Interior, and are recognized by the Secretary of the 
Interior as eligible for trust land status under part 151 of title 25, 
Code of Federal Regulations''.

SEC. 2021. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN SEPARABLE ELEMENTS.

    (a) In General.--If, in carrying out a water resources project, the 
Secretary identifies a separable element that would advance a primary 
mission of the Corps of Engineers, with benefits that could be achieved 
more cost-effectively if carried out in conjunction with the project, 
the Secretary, in consultation with the non-Federal interest, may carry 
out such separable element at Federal expense if the cost of such 
separable element does not exceed 3 percent of the Federal project cost 
and does not exceed $1,000,000.
    (b) Operation and Maintenance.--Operation and maintenance of a 
separable element of a project carried out under this section shall be 
a non-Federal responsibility.
    (c) Limitation on Statutory Construction.--Nothing in this section 
shall be construed to increase the amount authorized to be appropriated 
for a project beyond that amount authorized by law or to provide a 
separate authorization of appropriations.

SEC. 2022. PROSECUTION OF WORK.

    Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of September 22, 1922 (33 
U.S.C. 621; 42 Stat. 1043), is amended by inserting after ``harbors'' 
the following: ``, including any planning, engineering, design, 
construction, operation, and maintenance,''.

SEC. 2023. WILDFIRE FIREFIGHTING.

    Section 309 of Public Law 102-154 (42 U.S.C. 1856a-1; 105 Stat. 
1034) is amended by inserting ``the Secretary of the Army,'' after 
``the Secretary of Energy,''.

SEC. 2024. CREDIT FOR NONCONSTRUCTION SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to allow a non-Federal 
interest credit toward its share of project costs for any authorized 
water resources development project for the cost of materials and in-
kind services, including design and management services but not 
including construction, provided by the non-Federal interest for 
implementation of the project.
    (b) Limitation.--Credit authorized under subsection (a)--
            (1) shall not exceed the non-Federal share of project 
        costs;
            (2) shall not alter any other requirements that require a 
        non-Federal interest to provide lands, easements, rights-of-
        way, and dredged material disposal areas for the project;
            (3) shall not exceed the actual and reasonable costs of the 
        materials or in-kind services provided by the non-Federal 
        interest, as determined by the Secretary; and
            (4) shall not be allowed unless the Secretary has 
        determined that such materials or services are compatible with 
        and necessary for the project.

SEC. 2025. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE.

    Section 22 of Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 
1962d-16) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a) by striking ``The Secretary'' and 
        inserting the following:
    ``(a) Federal State Cooperation.--
            ``(1) Comprehensive plans.--The Secretary'';
            (2) by inserting after the last sentence in subsection (a) 
        the following:
            ``(2) Technical assistance.--
                            ``(A) In general.--At the request of a 
                        governmental agency or non-Federal interest, 
                        the Secretary may provide, at Federal expense, 
                        technical assistance to such agency or non-
                        Federal interest in managing water resources.
                            ``(B) Types of assistance.--Technical 
                        assistance under this paragraph may include 
                        provision and integration of hydrologic, 
                        economic, and environmental data and 
                        analyses.''
            (3) in subsection (b)(1) by striking ``this section'' each 
        place it appears and inserting ``subsection (a)(1)'';
            (4) in subsection (c) by striking ``(c) There is'' and 
        inserting the following:
    ``(c) Authorization of Appropriations.--
            ``(1) Federal and state cooperation.--There is'';
            (5) in subsection (c) strike ``the provisions of this 
        section'' and insert ``subsection (a)(1);''; and
            (6) by inserting at the end of subsection (c) the 
        following:
            ``(2) Technical assistance.--There is authorized to be 
        appropriated $5,000,000 annually to carry out subsection 
        (a)(2), of which not more than $2,000,000 annually may be used 
        by the Secretary to enter into cooperative agreements with 
        nonprofit organizations to provide assistance to rural and 
        small communities.''.

SEC. 2026. CENTERS OF SPECIALIZED PLANNING EXPERTISE.

    (a) Establishment.--The Secretary is authorized to establish 
centers to provide specialized planning expertise for water resources 
projects to be carried out by the Secretary to enhance and supplement 
the capabilities of the districts of the Army Corps of Engineers.
    (b) Duties.--A center of expertise shall have the following duties:
            (1) Providing technical and managerial assistance to 
        district engineers for project planning, development, and 
        implementation.
            (2) Providing peer reviews of new major scientific, 
        engineering, or economic methods, models or analyses that will 
        be used to support decisions of the Secretary with respect to 
        feasibility studies.
            (3) Providing support for external peer review panels 
        convened by the Secretary.
            (4) Performing such other duties as prescribed by the 
        Secretary.

SEC. 2027. COORDINATION AND SCHEDULING OF FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL 
              ACTIONS.

    (a) Notice of Intent.--Upon request of the non-Federal interest in 
the form of a written notice of intent to construct or modify a non-
Federal water supply, wastewater infrastructure, flood damage 
reduction, environmental restoration, or navigation project that 
requires the approval of the Secretary, the Secretary shall initiate, 
subject to subsection (g)(1), procedures to establish a schedule for 
consolidating Federal, State, and local agency and Indian tribe 
environmental assessments, project reviews, and issuance of all permits 
for the construction or modification of the project. The non-Federal 
interest shall submit to the Secretary, with the notice of intent, 
studies and documentation, including environmental reviews, that may be 
required by Federal law for decisionmaking on the proposed project. All 
States and Indian tribes having jurisdiction over the proposed project 
shall be invited by the Secretary, but shall not be required, to 
participate in carrying out this section with respect to the project.
    (b) Procedural Requirements.--Within 15 days after receipt of 
notice under subsection (a), the Secretary shall publish such notice in 
the Federal Register. The Secretary also shall provide written 
notification of the receipt of a notice under subsection (a) to all 
State and local agencies and Indian tribes that may be required to 
issue permits for the construction of the project or related 
activities. The Secretary shall solicit the cooperation of those 
agencies and request their entry into a memorandum of agreement 
described in subsection (c) with respect to the project. Within 30 days 
after publication of the notice in the Federal Register, State and 
local agencies and Indian tribes that intend to enter into the 
memorandum of agreement with respect to the project shall notify the 
Secretary of their intent in writing.
    (c) Scheduling Agreement.--Within 90 days after the date of receipt 
of notice under subsection (a) with respect to a project, the Secretary 
of the Interior, the Secretary of Commerce, and the Administrator of 
the Environmental Protection Agency, as necessary, and any State or 
local agencies that have notified the Secretary under subsection (b) 
shall enter into an agreement with the Secretary establishing a 
schedule of decisionmaking for approval of the project and permits 
associated with the project and with related activities.
    (d) Contents of Agreement.--An agreement entered into under 
subsection (c) with respect to a project, to the extent practicable, 
shall consolidate hearing and comment periods, procedures for data 
collection and report preparation, and the environmental review and 
permitting processes associated with the project and related 
activities. The agreement shall detail, to the extent possible, the 
non-Federal interest's responsibilities for data development and 
information that may be necessary to process each permit required for 
the project, including a schedule when the information and data will be 
provided to the appropriate Federal, State, or local agency or Indian 
tribe.
    (e) Revision of Agreement.--The Secretary may revise an agreement 
entered into under subsection (c) with respect to a project once to 
extend the schedule to allow the non-Federal interest the minimum 
amount of additional time necessary to revise its original application 
to meet the objections of a Federal, State, or local agency or Indian 
tribe that is a party to the agreement.
    (f) Final Decision.--Not later than the final day of a schedule 
established by an agreement entered into under subsection (c) with 
respect to a project, the Secretary shall notify the non-Federal 
interest of the final decision on the project and whether the permit or 
permits have been issued.
    (g) Reimbursement.--
            (1) Costs of coordination.--The costs incurred by the 
        Secretary to establish and carry out a schedule to consolidate 
        Federal, State, and local agency and Indian tribe environmental 
        assessments, project reviews, and permit issuance for a project 
        under this section shall be paid by the non-Federal interest.
            (2) Costs incurred to expedite permits and reviews.--
                    (A) Acceptance of non-federal funds.--The Secretary 
                may accept funds from the non-Federal interest to hire 
                additional staff or obtain the services of consultants, 
                or to provide financial, technical, and administrative 
                support to agencies that have entered into an agreement 
with the Secretary under subsection (c) with respect to a project in 
order to facilitate the timely processing, review, and completion of 
applicable Federal, State, and local agency and Indian tribe 
environmental assessments, project reviews, and permits for the 
project.
                    (B) Use of funds.--Funds accepted under this 
                paragraph shall be used to supplement existing 
                resources of the Secretary or a participating agency.
                    (C) Assurance of level of service and 
                impartiality.--The Secretary shall ensure that the 
                Department of the Army and any participating agency 
                that accepts funds under this paragraph shall continue 
                to provide the same level of service to other projects 
                and other responsibilities not covered by this section 
                as it would provide notwithstanding any activities 
                carried out under this section and that acceptance of 
                such funds will not impact impartial decisionmaking 
                either substantively or procedurally.
    (h) Report on Timesavings Methods.--Not later than 3 years after 
the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall prepare and 
transmit to Congress a report estimating the time required for the 
issuance of all Federal, State, local, and tribal permits for the 
construction of non-Federal projects for water supply, wastewater 
infrastructure, flood damage reduction, environmental restoration, and 
navigation. The Secretary shall include in that report recommendations 
for further reducing the amount of time required for the issuance of 
those permits, including any proposed changes in existing law.

SEC. 2028. PROJECT STREAMLINING.

    (a) Policy.--The benefits of water resources projects are important 
to the Nation's economy and environment, and recommendations to 
Congress regarding such projects should not be delayed due to 
uncoordinated and sequential environmental reviews or the failure to 
timely resolve disputes during the development of water resources 
projects.
    (b) Scope.--This section shall apply to each study initiated after 
the date of enactment of this Act to develop a feasibility report under 
section 905 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2282), or a reevaluation report, for a water resources project if the 
Secretary determines that such study requires an environmental impact 
statement under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
    (c) Water Resources Project Review Process.--The Secretary shall 
develop and implement a coordinated review process for water resources 
projects.
    (d) Coordinated Reviews.--
            (1) In general.--The coordinated review process under this 
        section shall provide that all environmental reviews, analyses, 
        opinions, permits, licenses, and approvals that must be issued 
        or made by a Federal, State, or local government agency or 
        Indian tribe for a water resources project will be conducted 
        concurrently, to the maximum extent practicable, and completed 
        within a time period established by the Secretary, in 
        cooperation with the agencies identified under subsection (e) 
        with respect to the project.
            (2) Agency participation.--Each Federal agency identified 
        under subsection (e) shall formulate and implement 
        administrative, policy, and procedural mechanisms to enable the 
        agency to ensure completion of environmental reviews, analyses, 
        opinions, permits, licenses, and approvals described in 
        paragraph (1) in a timely and environmentally responsible 
        manner.
    (e) Identification of Jurisdictional Agencies.--With respect to 
each water resources project, the Secretary shall identify, as soon as 
practicable, all Federal, State, and local government agencies and 
Indian tribes that may have jurisdiction over environmental-related 
matters that may be affected by the project or may be required by law 
to conduct an environmental-related review or analysis of the project 
or determine whether to issue an environmental-related permit, license, 
or approval for the project.
    (f) State Authority.--If a coordinated review process is being 
implemented under this section by the Secretary with respect to a water 
resources project within the boundaries of a State, the State, 
consistent with State law, may choose to participate in such process 
and provide that all State agencies that have jurisdiction over 
environmental-related matters that may be affected by the project or 
may be required by law to conduct an environmental-related review or 
analysis of the project or determine whether to issue an environmental-
related permit, license, or approval for the project, be subject to the 
process.
    (g) Memorandum of Understanding.--The coordinated review process 
developed under this section may be incorporated into a memorandum of 
understanding for a project between the Secretary and the heads of 
other Federal, State, and local government agencies and Indian tribes 
identified under subsection (e) with respect to the project and the 
non-Federal interest for the project.
    (h) Effect of Failure To Meet Deadline.--
            (1) Notification of congress and ceq.--If the Secretary 
        determines that a Federal, State, or local government agency, 
        Indian tribe, or non-Federal interest that is participating in 
        a coordinated review process under this section with respect to 
        a project has not met a deadline established under subsection 
        (d) for the project, the Secretary shall notify, within 30 days 
        of the date of such determination, the Committee on 
        Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives, the Committee on Environment and Public Works 
        of the Senate, the Council on Environmental Quality, and the 
        agency, Indian tribe, or non-Federal interest involved about 
        the failure to meet the deadline.
            (2) Agency report.--Not later than 30 days after the date 
        of receipt of a notice under paragraph (1), the Federal, State, 
        or local government agency, Indian tribe, or non-Federal 
        interest involved shall submit a report to the Secretary, the 
        Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives, the Committee on Environment and Public Works 
        of the Senate, and the Council on Environmental Quality 
        explaining why the agency, Indian tribe, or non-Federal 
        interest did not meet the deadline and what actions it intends 
        to take to complete or issue the required review, analysis, 
        opinion, permit, license, or approval.
    (i) Purpose and Need and Determination of Reasonable 
Alternatives.--
            (1) In general.--As an official of the lead Federal agency 
        that is responsible for carrying out a study to which this 
        section applies and its associated process for meeting the 
        requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
        (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and as the Federal agency with 
        expertise in water resources development, the Secretary, in 
        carrying out such study and process, shall--
                    (A) define the purpose and need for the proposed 
                water resources project; and
                    (B) determine which alternatives are reasonable and 
                may be reasonably anticipated to meet project purposes 
                and needs.
            (2) Streamlining study.--To streamline a study to which 
        this section applies and its associated process for meeting the 
        requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
        (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), the Secretary may eliminate from 
        consideration any alternatives the Secretary determines are not 
        reasonable or are not reasonably anticipated to meet project 
        purposes and needs.
    (j) Solicitation and Consideration of Comments.--In applying 
subsection (i), the Secretary shall solicit, consider, and respond to 
comments from interested persons and governmental entities.
    (k) Categorical Exclusions.--Not later than 120 days after the date 
of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall develop and publish a 
list of categorical exclusions from the requirement that an 
environmental assessment or an environmental impact statement be 
prepared under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 
4321 et seq.) for water resources projects.
    (l) Limitations.--Nothing in this section shall preempt or 
interfere with--
            (1) any practice of seeking public comment;
            (2) any power, jurisdiction, or authority that a Federal, 
        State, or local government agency, Indian tribe, or non-Federal 
        interest has with respect to carrying out a water resources 
        project; or
            (3) any obligation to comply with the provisions of the 
        National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4371 et 
        seq.) and the regulations issued by the Council on 
        Environmental Quality to carry out such Act.
    (m) Benchmarks.--Within 12 months of the date of enactment of this 
Act, the Chief of Engineers shall establish benchmarks for determining 
the length of time it should take to conduct a feasibility study for a 
water resources development project and its associated review process 
under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4371 et 
seq.). Benchmarks may be established for activities based on project 
type, size, cost, and complexity. The Chief of Engineers shall use such 
benchmarks as a management tool to make the feasibility study process 
more efficient in all districts of the Army Corps of Engineers.

SEC. 2029. LAKES PROGRAM.

    Section 602(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4148; 110 Stat. 3758; 113 Stat. 295) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at end of paragraph (18);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (19) and 
        inserting a semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(20) Kinkaid Lake, Jackson County, Illinois, removal of 
        silt and aquatic growth and measures to address excessive 
        sedimentation;
            ``(21) Rogers Pond, Franklin Township, New Jersey, removal 
        of silt and restoration of structural integrity;
            ``(22) Greenwood Lake, Greenwood Lake, New York, removal of 
        silt and aquatic growth; and
            ``(23) Lake Rodgers, Creedmoor, North Carolina, removal of 
        silt and excessive nutrients and restoration of structural 
        integrity.''.

SEC. 2030. MITIGATION FOR FISH AND WILDLIFE LOSSES.

    (a) Completion of Mitigation.--Section 906(a) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283(a)) is amended by 
adding at the following:
            ``(3) Completion of mitigation.--In those instances in 
        which it is not technically practicable to complete mitigation 
        concurrent with the last day of project construction because of 
        the nature of the mitigation to be undertaken, the Secretary 
        shall complete the required mitigation as expeditiously as 
        practicable, but in no case later than the last day of the 
        first fiscal year beginning after the last day of construction 
        of the project or separable element of the project.''.
    (b) Mitigation Plan Contents.--Section 906(d) of such Act (33 
U.S.C. 2283(d)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Contents.--A mitigation plan shall include--
                    ``(A) a description of the physical action to be 
                undertaken to achieve the mitigation objectives within 
                the watershed in which such losses occur and, in any 
case in which mitigation must take place outside the watershed, a 
justification detailing the rationale for undertaking the mitigation 
outside of the watershed;
                    ``(B) a description of the lands or interests in 
                lands to be acquired for mitigation and the basis for a 
                determination that such lands are available for 
                acquisition;
                    ``(C) the type, amount, and characteristics of the 
                habitat being restored;
                    ``(D) success criteria for mitigation based on 
                replacement of lost functions and values of the 
                habitat, including hydrologic and vegetative 
                characteristics; and
                    ``(E) a plan for any necessary monitoring to 
                determine the success of the mitigation, including the 
                cost and duration of any monitoring, and to the extent 
                practicable, the entities responsible for any 
                monitoring.
            ``(4) Responsibility for monitoring.--In any case in which 
        it is not practicable to identify in a mitigation plan for a 
        water resources project, the entity responsible for monitoring 
        at the time of a final report of the Chief of Engineers or 
        other final decision document for the project, such entity 
        shall be identified in the partnership agreement entered into 
        with the non-Federal interest.''.
    (c) Status Report.--
            (1) In general.--Concurrent with the President's submission 
        to Congress of the President's request for appropriations for 
        the Civil Works Program for a fiscal year, the Secretary shall 
        submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of 
        the House of Representatives and the Committee on the 
        Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report on the 
        status of construction of projects that require mitigation 
        under section 906 of Water Resources Development Act 1986 (33 
        U.S.C. 2283; 100 Stat. 4186) and the status of such mitigation.
            (2) Projects included.--The status report shall include the 
        status of all projects that are under construction, all 
        projects for which the President requests funding for the next 
        fiscal year, and all projects that have completed construction, 
        but have not completed the mitigation required under section 
        906 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986.

SEC. 2031. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.

    (a) In General.--For the purpose of expediting the cost-effective 
design and construction of wetlands restoration that is part of an 
authorized water resources project, the Secretary may enter into 
cooperative agreements under section 6305 of title 31, United States 
Code, with nonprofit organizations with expertise in wetlands 
restoration to carry out such design and construction on behalf of the 
Secretary.
    (b) Limitations.--
            (1) Per project limit.--A cooperative agreement under this 
        section shall not obligate the Secretary to pay the nonprofit 
        organization more than $1,000,000 for any single wetlands 
        restoration project.
            (2) Annual limit.--The total value of work carried out 
        under cooperative agreements under this section may not exceed 
        $5,000,000 in any fiscal year.

SEC. 2032. PROJECT PLANNING.

    (a) Objectives.--
            (1) Flood control, navigation, and hurricane and storm 
        damage reduction projects.--The Federal objective of any study 
        of the feasibility of a water resources project carried out by 
        the Secretary for flood damage reduction, navigation, or 
        hurricane and storm damage reduction shall be to maximize the 
        net national economic development benefits associated with the 
        project, consistent with protecting the Nation's environment.
            (2) Ecosystem restoration projects.--The Federal objective 
        of any study of the feasibility of a water resources project 
        for ecosystem restoration carried out by the Secretary shall be 
        to maximize the net national ecosystem restoration benefits 
        associated with the project, consistent with national economic 
        development.
            (3) Projects with multiple purposes.--In the case of a 
        study that includes multiple project purposes, the primary and 
        other project purposes shall be evaluated, based on the 
        relevant Federal objective identified under paragraphs (1) and 
        (2).
            (4) Selection of project alternatives.--
                    (A) In general.--Notwithstanding the Federal 
                objectives identified in this subsection, the Secretary 
                may select a project alternative that does not maximize 
                net benefits if there is an overriding reason based 
                upon other Federal, State, local, or international 
                concerns.
                    (B) Flood damage reduction, navigation, and 
                hurricane storm damage reduction projects.--With 
                respect to a water resources project described in 
                paragraph (1), an overriding reason for selecting a 
                plan other than the plan that maximizes national 
                economic development benefits may be if the Secretary 
                determines, and the non-Federal interest concurs, that 
                an alternative plan is feasible and achieves the 
                project purposes while providing greater ecosystem 
                restoration benefits.
                    (C) Ecosystem restoration projects.--With respect 
                to a water resources project described in paragraph 
                (2), an overriding reason for selecting a plan other 
                than the plan that maximizes national ecosystem 
                restoration benefits may be if the Secretary 
                determines, and the non-Federal interest concurs, that 
                an alternative is feasible and achieves the project 
                purpose while providing greater economic development 
                benefits.
    (b) Identifying Additional Benefits and Projects.--
            (1) Primarily economic benefits.--In conducting a study of 
        the feasibility of a project where the primary benefits are 
        expected to be economic, the Secretary may identify ecosystem 
        restoration benefits that may be achieved in the study area 
        and, after obtaining the participation of a non-Federal 
        interest, may study and recommend construction of a separate 
        project or separable project element to achieve those benefits.
            (2) Primarily ecosystem restoration benefits.--In 
        conducting a study of the feasibility of a project where the 
        primary benefits are expected to be associated with ecosystem 
        restoration, the Secretary may identify economic benefits that 
        may be achieved in the study area and, after obtaining the 
        participation of a non-Federal interest, may study and 
        recommend construction of a separate project or separable 
        project element to achieve those benefits.
            (3) Rules applicable to identified separate projects and 
        elements.--Any separate project or separable element identified 
        under paragraph (1) or (2) and recommended for construction 
        shall not be considered integral to the underlying project 
        under study and, if authorized, shall be subject to a separate 
        partnership agreement, unless a non-Federal interest agrees to 
        share in the cost of both projects or separable elements.
    (c) Calculation of Benefits and Costs for Flood Damage Reduction 
Projects.--A feasibility study for a project for flood damage reduction 
shall include, as part of the calculation of benefits and costs--
            (1) a calculation of the residual risk of flooding 
        following completion of the proposed project;
            (2) a calculation of any upstream or downstream impacts of 
        the proposed project; and
            (3) calculations to ensure that the benefits and costs 
        associated with structural and nonstructural alternatives are 
        evaluated in an equitable manner.

SEC. 2033. INDEPENDENT PEER REVIEW.

    (a) Project Studies Subject to Independent Peer Review.--
            (1) In general.--Project studies shall be subject to a peer 
        review by an independent panel of experts as determined under 
        this section.
            (2) Scope.--The peer review may include a review of the 
        economic and environmental assumptions and projections, project 
        evaluation data, economic analyses, environmental analyses, 
        engineering analyses, formulation of alternative plans, methods 
        for integrating risk and uncertainty, models used in evaluation 
        of economic or environmental impacts of proposed projects, and 
        any biological opinions of the project study.
            (3) Project studies subject to peer review.--
                    (A) Mandatory.--A project study shall be subject to 
                peer review under paragraph (1) if the project has an 
                estimated total cost of more than $50,000,000, 
                including mitigation costs, and is not determined by 
                the Chief of Engineers to be exempt from peer review 
                under paragraph (6).
                    (B) Discretionary.--A project study may be subject 
                to peer review if--
                            (i) the Governor of an affected State 
                        requests a peer review by an independent panel 
                        of experts;
                            (ii) the head of a Federal or State agency 
                        charged with reviewing the project study 
                        determines that the project is likely to have a 
                        significant adverse impact on environmental, 
                        cultural, or other resources under the 
                        jurisdiction of the agency after implementation 
                        of proposed mitigation plans and requests a 
                        peer review by an independent panel of experts; 
                        or
                            (iii) the Chief of Engineers determines 
                        that the project study is controversial.
            (4) Controversial projects.--Upon receipt of a written 
        request under paragraph (3)(B) or on the initiative of the 
        Chief of Engineers, the Chief of Engineers shall determine 
        whether a project study is controversial.
            (5) Factors to consider.--In determining whether a project 
        study is controversial, the Chief of Engineers shall consider 
        if--
                    (A) there is a significant public dispute as to the 
                size, nature, or effects of the project; or
                    (B) there is a significant public dispute as to the 
                economic or environmental costs or benefits of the 
                project.
            (6) Project studies excluded from peer review.--Project 
        studies that may be excluded from peer review under paragraph 
        (1) are--
                    (A) a study for a project the Chief of Engineers 
                determines--
                            (i) is not controversial;
                            (ii) has no more than negligible adverse 
                        impacts on scarce or unique cultural, historic, 
                        or tribal resources;
                            (iii) has no substantial adverse impacts on 
                        fish and wildlife species and their habitat 
                        prior to the implementation of mitigation 
                        measures; and
                            (iv) has, before implementation of 
                        mitigation measures, no more than a negligible 
                        adverse impact on a species listed as 
                        endangered or threatened species under the 
                        Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1539 
                        et seq.) or the critical habitat of such 
                        species designated under such Act; and
                    (B) a study for a project pursued under section 205 
                of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), 
                section 2 of the Flood Control Act of August 28, 1937 
                (33 U.S.C. 701g), section 14 of the Flood Control Act 
                of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r), section 107(a) of the River 
                and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577(a)), section 3 of 
                the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing Federal 
                participation in the cost of protecting the shores of 
                publicly owned property'', approved August 13, 1946 (33 
                U.S.C. 426g), section 111 of the River and Harbor Act 
                of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 426i), section 3 of the Act entitled 
                ``An Act authorizing the construction, repair, and 
                preservation of certain public works on rivers and 
                harbors, and for other purposes'', approved March 2, 
                1945 (33 U.S.C. 603a), section 1135 of the Water 
                Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a), 
                section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
                1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), or section 204 of the Water 
                Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326).
            (7) Appeal.--The decision of the Chief of Engineers whether 
        to peer review a project study shall be published in the 
        Federal Register and shall be subject to appeal by a person 
        referred to in paragraph (3)(B)(i) or (3)(B)(ii) to the 
        Secretary of the Army if such appeal is made within the 30-day 
        period following the date of such publication.
            (8) Determination of project cost.--For purposes of 
        determining the estimated total cost of a project under 
        paragraph (3)(A), the project cost shall be based upon the 
        reasonable estimates of the Chief of Engineers at the 
        completion of the reconnaissance study for the project. If the 
        reasonable estimate of project costs is subsequently determined 
        to be in excess of the amount in paragraph (3)(A), the Chief of 
        Engineers shall make a determination whether a project study 
        should be reviewed under this section.
    (b) Timing of Peer Review.--The Chief of Engineers shall determine 
the timing of a peer review of a project study under subsection (a). In 
all cases, the peer review shall occur during the period beginning on 
the date of the completion of the reconnaissance study for the project 
and ending on the date the draft report of the Chief of Engineers for 
the project is made available for public comment. Where the Chief of 
Engineers has not initiated a peer review of a project study, the Chief 
of Engineers shall consider, at a minimum, whether to initiate a peer 
review at the time that--
            (1) the without project conditions are identified;
            (2) the array of alternatives to be considered are 
        identified; and
            (3) the preferred alternative is identified.
Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to require the Chief of 
Engineers to conduct multiple peer reviews for a project study.
    (c) Establishment of Panels.--
            (1) In general.--For each project study subject to peer 
        review under subsection (a), as soon as practicable after the 
        Chief of Engineers determines that a project study will be 
        subject to peer review, the Chief of Engineers shall contract 
        with the National Academy of Sciences (or a similar independent 
        scientific and technical advisory organization), or an eligible 
        organization, to establish a panel of experts to peer review 
        the project study for technical and scientific sufficiency.
            (2) Membership.--A panel of experts established for a 
        project study under this section shall be composed of 
        independent experts who represent a balance of areas of 
        expertise suitable for the review being conducted.
            (3) Limitation on appointments.--An individual may not be 
        selected to serve on a panel of experts established for a 
        project study under this section if the individual has a 
        financial or close professional association with any 
        organization or group with a strong financial or organizational 
        interest in the project.
            (4) Congressional notification.--Upon identification of a 
        project study for peer review under this section, but prior to 
        initiation of any review, the Chief of Engineers shall notify 
        the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and 
        the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House 
        of Representatives of such review.
    (d) Duties of Panels.--A panel of experts established for a peer 
review for a project study under this section shall, consistent with 
the scope of the referral for review--
            (1) conduct a peer review for the project study submitted 
        to the panel for review;
            (2) assess the adequacy and acceptability of the economic 
        and environmental methods, models, and analyses used by the 
        Chief of Engineers;
            (3) provide timely written and oral comments to the Chief 
        of Engineers throughout the development of the project study, 
        as requested; and
            (4) submit to the Chief of Engineers a final report 
        containing the panel's economic, engineering, and environmental 
        analysis of the project study, including the panel's assessment 
        of the adequacy and acceptability of the economic and 
        environmental methods, models, and analyses used by the Chief 
        of Engineers, to accompany the publication of the project 
        study.
    (e) Duration of Project Study Peer Reviews.--
            (1) Deadline.--A panel of experts shall--
                    (A) complete its peer review under this section for 
                a project study and submit a report to the Chief of 
                Engineers under subsection (d)(4) within 180 days after 
                the date of establishment of the panel, or, if the 
                Chief of Engineers determines that a longer period of 
                time is necessary, such period of time established by 
                the Chief of Engineers, but in no event later than 90 
                days after the date a draft project study is made 
                available for public review; and
                    (B) terminate on the date of submission of the 
                report.
            (2) Failure to meet deadline.--If a panel does not complete 
        its peer review of a project study under this section and 
        submit a report to the Chief of Engineers under subsection 
        (d)(4) on or before the deadline established by paragraph (1) 
        for the project study, the Chief of Engineers shall continue 
        the project study for the project that is subject to peer 
        review by the panel without delay.
    (f) Recommendations of Panel.--
            (1) Consideration by the chief of engineers.--After 
        receiving a report on a project study from a panel of experts 
        under this section and before entering a final record of 
        decision for the project, the Chief of Engineers shall consider 
        any recommendations contained in the report and prepare a 
        written response for any recommendations adopted or not 
        adopted.
            (2) Public availability and transmittal to congress.--After 
        receiving a report on a project study from a panel of experts 
        under this section, the Chief of Engineers shall--
                    (A) make a copy of the report and any written 
                response of the Chief of Engineers on recommendations 
                contained in the report available to the public; and
                    (B) transmit to Congress a copy of the report, 
                together with any such written response, on the date of 
                a final report of the Chief of Engineers or other final 
                decision document for a project study that is subject 
                to peer review by the panel.
    (g) Costs.--
            (1) In general.--The costs of a panel of experts 
        established for a peer review under this section--
                    (A) shall be a Federal expense; and
                    (B) shall not exceed $500,000.
            (2) Waiver.--The Chief of Engineers may waive the $500,000 
        limitation contained in paragraph (1)(B) in cases that the 
        Chief of Engineers determines appropriate.
    (h) Applicability.--This section shall apply to--
            (1) project studies initiated during the 2-year period 
        preceding the date of enactment of this Act and for which the 
        array of alternatives to be considered has not been identified; 
        and
            (2) project studies initiated during the period beginning 
        on such date of enactment and ending 4 years after such date of 
        enactment.
    (i) Report.--Within 4 1/2 years of the date of enactment of this 
section, the Chief of Engineers shall submit a report to Congress on 
the implementation of this section.
    (j) Nonapplicability of FACA.--The Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to any peer review panel established 
under this section.
    (k) Savings Clause.--Nothing in this section shall be construed to 
affect any authority of the Chief of Engineers to cause or conduct a 
peer review of a water resources project existing on the date of 
enactment of this section.
    (l) Definitions.--In this section, the following definitions apply:
            (1) Project study.--The term ``project study'' means a 
        feasibility study or reevaluation study for a project. The term 
        also includes any other study associated with a modification or 
        update of a project that includes an environmental impact 
        statement, including the environmental impact statement.
            (2) Affected state.--The term ``affected State'', as used 
        with respect to a project, means a State all or a portion of 
        which is within the drainage basin in which the project is or 
        would be located and would be economically or environmentally 
        affected as a consequence of the project.
            (3) Eligible organization.--The term ``eligible 
        organization'' means an organization that--
                    (A) is described in section 501(c)(3), and exempt 
                from Federal tax under section 501(a), of the Internal 
                Revenue Code of 1986;
                    (B) is independent;
                    (C) is free from conflicts of interest;
                    (D) does not carry out or advocate for or against 
                Federal water resources projects; and
                    (E) has experience in establishing and 
                administering peer review panels.

                 TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

SEC. 3001. COOK INLET, ALASKA.

    (a) Anchorage Harbor.--The project for navigation improvements, 
Cook Inlet, Alaska (Anchorage Harbor, Alaska), authorized by section 
101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 299) and modified by 
section 199 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (90 Stat. 
2944), is further modified to direct the Secretary to establish a 
harbor depth of minus 45 feet mean lower low water for a length of 
5,200 feet at the modified Port of Anchorage intermodal marine facility 
at each phase as such phases are completed and thereafter as the entire 
project is completed, at a total cost of $8,175,000. Federal 
maintenance shall continue for the existing facility until the modified 
facility is completed. Federal maintenance of the modified project 
shall be in accordance with such section 101; except that the project 
shall be maintained at a depth of minus 45 feet mean lower low water 
for such 5,200 feet, at an estimated annual cost of $6,000,000.
    (b) Navigation Channel.--The Secretary shall modify the channel 
depth to run the entire length of Fire Island Range and Point Woronzof 
Range maintaining the same width and modifying the depth to minus 45 
feet mean lower low water in the existing Cook Inlet Navigation Channel 
approach to Anchorage Harbor, Alaska, at a total cost of $21,525,000. 
The project shall be maintained at a depth of minus 45 mean lower low 
water, at an estimated annual cost of $3,000,000.

SEC. 3002. KING COVE HARBOR, ALASKA.

    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for the 
project for navigation, King Cove Harbor, Alaska, being carried out 
under section 107 of the River Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), 
shall be $8,000,000.

SEC. 3003. SITKA, ALASKA.

    The Thompson Harbor, Sitka, Alaska, element of the project for 
navigation Southeast Alaska Harbors of Refuge, Alaska, authorized by 
section 101 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 
4801), is modified to direct the Secretary to take such action as may 
be necessary to correct design deficiencies in such element, at a 
Federal expense of $6,300,000.

SEC. 3004. TATILEK, ALASKA.

    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for the 
project for navigation, Tatilek, Alaska, being carried out under 
section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), shall 
be $10,000,000.

SEC. 3005. NOGALES WASH AND TRIBUTARIES, ARIZONA.

    The project for flood control, Nogales Wash and tributaries, 
Arizona, authorized by section 101(a)(4) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4606) and modified by section 303 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3711) and 
section 302 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 
2600), is further modified to direct the Secretary to use the Mexico 
Plan-1st Added Increment, as described in the limited reevaluation 
report dated September 13, 2002, to determine the cost allocation and 
cost apportionment for the project.

SEC. 3006. GRAND PRAIRIE REGION AND BAYOU METO BASIN, ARKANSAS.

    The Secretary shall review the general reevaluation report for the 
Bayou Meto basin element of the project for Grand Prairie Region and 
Bayou Meto Basin, Arkansas, reauthorized by section 363(a) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3730), and make a 
determination of whether the element is feasible, regardless of mission 
priorities.

SEC. 3007. SAINT FRANCIS BASIN, ARKANSAS.

    The project for flood control, Saint Francis Basin, Missouri and 
Arkansas, authorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1950 
(64 Stat. 172), is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct 
improvements along Ditch No. 1 that consist of a gated culvert through 
the Saint Francis Levee and related channel improvements.

SEC. 3008. AMERICAN AND SACRAMENTO RIVERS, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood damage reduction, American and Sacramento 
Rivers, California, authorized by section 101(a)(1) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3662-3663) and modified by 
section 366 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 
319-320), is further modified to direct the Secretary to carry out the 
project, at a total cost of $205,000,000.

SEC. 3009. CACHE CREEK BASIN, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood control, Cache Creek Basin, California, 
authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4112), is modified to direct the Secretary to mitigate 
the impacts of the new south levee of the Cache Creek settling basin on 
the city of Woodland's storm drainage system, including all appurtenant 
features, erosion control measures, and environmental protection 
features. Such mitigation shall restore the city's preproject capacity 
(1,360 cubic feet per second) to release water to the Yolo Bypass, 
including channel improvements, an outlet work through the west levee 
of the Yolo Bypass, and a new low-flow cross channel to handle city and 
county storm drainage and settling basin flows (1,760 cubic feet per 
second) when the Yolo Bypass is in a low flow condition.

SEC. 3010. GRAYSON CREEK/MURDERER'S CREEK, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Grayson Creek/
Murderer's Creek, California, being carried out under section 206 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), is 
modified to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal share 
of the cost of the project the cost of work carried out by the non-
Federal interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
project and to authorize the Secretary to consider national ecosystem 
restoration benefits in determining the Federal interest in the 
project.

SEC. 3011. JOHN F. BALDWIN SHIP CHANNEL AND STOCKTON SHIP CHANNEL, 
              CALIFORNIA.

    The project for navigation, San Francisco to Stockton, California, 
authorized by section 301 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 
1091) is modified--
            (1) to provide that the non-Federal share of the cost of 
        the John F. Baldwin Ship Channel and Stockton Ship Channel 
        element of the project may be provided in the form of in-kind 
        services and materials; and
            (2) to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-
        Federal share of the cost of such element the cost of planning 
        and design work carried out by the non-Federal interest before 
        the date of an agreement for such planning and design if the 
        Secretary determines that such work is integral to such 
        element.

SEC. 3012. LOS ANGELES HARBOR, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for navigation, Los Angeles Harbor, Los Angeles, 
California, authorized by section 101(b)(5) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2577), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project the cost of the planning, design, and construction work carried 
out by the non-Federal interest before the date of the partnership 
agreement for the project if the Secretary determines the work is 
integral to the project.

SEC. 3013. LARKSPUR FERRY CHANNEL, LARKSPUR, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for navigation, Larkspur Ferry Channel, Larkspur, 
California, authorized by section 601(d) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4148), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to prepare a limited reevaluation report to determine whether 
maintenance of the project is feasible. If the Secretary determines 
that maintenance of the project is feasible, the Secretary shall carry 
out the maintenance.

SEC. 3014. NAPA RIVER SALT MARSH RESTORATION, NAPA RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

    In carrying out the feasibility study for the project for aquatic 
ecosystem restoration, Napa River Salt Marsh Restoration, Napa and 
Sonoma Counties, California, the Secretary shall determine whether work 
carried out by the non-Federal interest is integral to the project. In 
any case in which the work is determined to be integral to the project 
before completion of the final report of the Chief of Engineers on the 
project, such work shall be included as part of the project, and the 
cost of such work shall be recommended in the final report for credit 
toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project. Work carried 
out after submission of the final report and before the date of the 
partnership agreement for the project that is determined to be integral 
to the project shall be considered as part of the project, and the cost 
of such work shall be credited toward the non-Federal share of the cost 
of the project.

SEC. 3015. PACIFIC FLYWAY CENTER, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Pacific Flyway 
Center, Sacramento, California, being carried out under section 206 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), is 
modified to authorize the Secretary to expend $2,000,000 to enhance 
public access to the project.

SEC. 3016. PINOLE CREEK, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for improvement of the quality of the environment, 
Pinole Creek Phase I, California, being carried out under section 1135 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a), is 
modified to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal share 
of the cost of the project the cost of work carried out by the non-
Federal interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
project.

SEC. 3017. PRADO DAM, CALIFORNIA.

    Upon completion of the modifications to the Prado Dam element of 
the project for flood control, Santa Ana River Mainstem, California, 
authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4113), the Memorandum of Agreement for the Operation 
for Prado Dam for Seasonal Additional Water Conservation between the 
Department of the Army and the Orange County Water District (including 
all the conditions and stipulations in the memorandum) shall remain in 
effect for volumes of water made available prior to such modifications.

SEC. 3018. SACRAMENTO DEEP WATER SHIP CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for navigation, Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel, 
California, authorized by section 202(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4092), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project the cost of planning and design work carried out by the non-
Federal interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
project.

SEC. 3019. SACRAMENTO RIVER, GLENN-COLUSA, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood control, Sacramento River, California, 
authorized by section 2 of the Act entitled ``An Act to provide for the 
control of the floods of the Mississippi River and of the Sacramento 
River, California, and for other purposes'', approved March 1, 1917 (39 
Stat. 949), and modified by section 102 of the Energy and Water 
Development Appropriations Act, 1990 (103 Stat. 649), section 301(b)(3) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3110), title 
I of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1999 (112 
Stat. 1841), and section 305 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1999 (113 Stat. 299), is further modified to direct the Secretary to 
credit the non-Federal interest up to $4,000,000 toward the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the project for costs incurred by the non-Federal 
interest in carrying out activities (including the provision of lands, 
easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and dredged material disposal 
areas) associated with environmental compliance for the project if the 
Secretary determines that the activities are integral to the project.

SEC. 3020. SAN LORENZO RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood control, San Lorenzo River, California, 
authorized by section 101(a)(5) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1996 (110 Stat. 3663), is modified to direct the Secretary to credit 
not more than $2,000,000 toward the non-Federal share of the cost of 
the project for the cost of the work carried out by the non-Federal 
interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the project 
if the Secretary determines the work is integral to the project.

SEC. 3021. UPPER GUADALUPE RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood damage reduction and recreation, Upper 
Guadalupe River, California, described as the Bypass Channel Plan of 
the Chief of Engineers dated August 19, 1998, authorized by section 
101(a)(9) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 
275), is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project, 
at a total cost of $140,328,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$70,164,000, and an estimated non-Federal cost of $70,164,000. The non-
Federal share of the cost of the project shall be subject to section 
103(a)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2213(a)(3)).

SEC. 3022. WALNUT CREEK CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Walnut Creek 
Channel, California, being carried out under section 206 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), is modified to 
direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost 
of the project the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal interest 
before the date of the partnership agreement for the project if the 
Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project and to 
authorize the Secretary to consider national ecosystem restoration 
benefits in determining the Federal interest in the project.

SEC. 3023. WILDCAT/SAN PABLO CREEK PHASE I, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for improvement of the quality of the environment, 
Wildcat/San Pablo Creek Phase I, California, being carried out under 
section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2309a), is modified to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-
Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of work carried out 
by the non-Federal interest before the date of the partnership 
agreement for the project if the Secretary determines that the work is 
integral to the project.

SEC. 3024. WILDCAT/SAN PABLO CREEK PHASE II, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Wildcat/San Pablo 
Creek Phase II, California, being carried out under section 206 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), is modified 
to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal share of the 
cost of the project the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal 
interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the project 
if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project 
and to authorize the Secretary to consider national ecosystem 
restoration benefits in determining the Federal interest in the 
project.

SEC. 3025. BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA.

    Section 310 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 301) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) Credit.--After completion of the study, the Secretary shall 
credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost 
of nourishment and renourishment associated with the shore protection 
project incurred by the non-Federal interest to respond to damages to 
Brevard County beaches that are the result of a Federal navigation 
project, as determined in the final report for the study.''.

SEC. 3026. BROWARD COUNTY AND HILLSBORO INLET, FLORIDA.

    The project for shore protection, Broward County and Hillsboro 
Inlet, Florida, authorized by section 301 of the River and Harbor Act 
of 1965 (79 Stat. 1090), and modified by section 311 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 301), is further modified 
to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal share of the 
cost of the project the cost of mitigation construction and derelict 
erosion control structure removal carried out by the non-Federal 
interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the project 
if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project.

SEC. 3027. GASPARILLA AND ESTERO ISLANDS, FLORIDA.

    The project for shore protection, Gasparilla and Estero Island 
segments, Lee County, Florida, authorized under section 201 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1073) by Senate Resolution dated 
December 17, 1970, and by House Resolution dated December 15, 1970, and 
modified by section 309 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2602), is further modified to direct the Secretary to credit 
toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of 
work carried out by the non-Federal interest before the date of the 
partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary determines that 
the work is integral to the project.

SEC. 3028. LIDO KEY BEACH, SARASOTA, FLORIDA.

    The project for shore protection, Lido Key Beach, Sarasota, 
Florida, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1970 
(84 Stat. 1819), deauthorized under section 1001(b) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)), and reauthorized 
by section 364(2)(A) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
(113 Stat. 313), is modified to direct the Secretary to construct the 
project, at a total cost of $12,926,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
of $6,547,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $6,379,000, and at 
an estimated average annual cost of $925,000 for periodic nourishment 
over the 50-year life of the project, with an estimated annual Federal 
cost of $468,500 and an estimated annual non-Federal cost of $456,500.

SEC. 3029. MANATEE HARBOR, FLORIDA.

    The project for navigation, Manatee Harbor, Florida, authorized by 
section 202(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4093) and modified by section 102(j) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4612), is further modified--
            (1) to include the construction of an extension of the 
        south channel a distance of approximately 1584 feet consistent 
        with the general reevaluation report, dated April 2002, 
        prepared by the Jacksonville District Corps of Engineers, at a 
        total cost of $11,300,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $8,475,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $2,825,000;
            (2) to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-
        Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of in-kind 
        services and materials provided for the project by the non-
        Federal interest;
            (3) to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-
        Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of planning, 
        design, and construction work carried out by the non-Federal 
        interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
        project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral 
        to the project; and
            (4) to authorize the Secretary to carry out the project as 
        modified at a total cost of $61,500,000.

SEC. 3030. TAMPA HARBOR, FLORIDA.

    The project for navigation, Tampa Harbor, Florida, referred to in 
section 4 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of September 22, 1922 (42 Stat. 
1042), is modified to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-
Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of planning, design, 
and construction work carried out by the non-Federal interest before 
the date of the partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary 
determines that the work is integral to the project.

SEC. 3031. TAMPA HARBOR-BIG BEND CHANNEL, FLORIDA.

    The project for navigation, Tampa Harbor-Big Bend Channel, Florida, 
authorized by section 101(a)(18) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1999 (113 Stat. 276) is modified to direct the Secretary to credit 
toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of 
planning, design, and construction work carried out by the non-Federal 
interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the project 
if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project.

SEC. 3032. MIAMI HARBOR, FLORIDA.

    The project for navigation, Miami Harbor Channel, Florida, 
authorized by section 101(a)(9) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1990 (104 Stat. 4606) and modified by section 315 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 302), is further modified 
to include as a project purpose environmental mitigation required 
before July 18, 2003, by Federal, State, and local environmental 
agencies for unauthorized or unanticipated environmental impacts 
within, or in the vicinity of, the authorized project.

SEC. 3033. LITTLE WOOD RIVER, GOODING, IDAHO.

    The project for flood damage reduction, Little Wood River, Gooding, 
Idaho, being carried out under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 
1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), is modified--
            (1) to authorize the non-Federal interest to provide any 
        portion of the non-Federal share of the cost of the project in 
        the form of services, materials, supplies, or other in-kind 
        contributions;
            (2) to authorize the non-Federal interest to use funds made 
        available under any other Federal program toward the non-
        Federal share of the cost of the project if such use of the 
        funds is permitted under the other Federal program; and
            (3) to direct the Secretary, in calculating the non-Federal 
        share of the cost of the project, to make a determination under 
        section 103(m) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
        (33 U.S.C. 2213(m)) on the non-Federal interest's ability to 
        pay.

SEC. 3034. HENNEPIN-HOPPER LAKES, ILLINOIS.

    (a) Project Purpose.--The project for flood control, Hennepin 
levees, Illinois, authorized by the Flood Control Act of June 26, 1936 
(35 Stat. 1583), is modified to add environmental restoration as a 
project purpose.
    (b) Maximum Amount.--The maximum amount of Federal funds that may 
be expended for the project for improvement of the quality of the 
environment, Hennepin-Hopper Lakes, Illinois, being carried out under 
section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2309a), shall be $7,500,000.
    (c) Limitation.--Nothing in this section shall affect the 
eligibility of the project for emergency repair assistance under 
section 5(a) of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction 
of certain public works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and 
for other purposes'', approved August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n).

SEC. 3035. MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND BIG MUDDY RIVER, ILLINOIS.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood control, Mississippi River 
and Big Muddy River, Illinois, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 
1938, is modified to authorize the Secretary to carry out repair and 
rehabilitation of the project at a total cost of $22,600,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $16,950,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
of $5,650,000, and to perform operation and maintenance of the project 
thereafter.
    (b) Other Assistance.--Federal assistance made available through 
the Department of Agriculture may be used toward payment of the non-
Federal share of the costs of the repair and rehabilitation under this 
section.
    (c) United States Lands.--Costs under this section for the repair 
and rehabilitation allocable to the protection of lands owned by the 
United States shall be a Federal responsibility. The Secretary shall 
seek reimbursement from the Secretary of Agriculture for the costs 
allocated to protecting lands owned by the Department of Agriculture.
    (d) Operation and Maintenance of Non-Federal Lands.--The cost of 
operation and maintenance under this section allocated to protecting 
non-Federal lands shall be a non-Federal responsibility.

SEC. 3036. SPUNKY BOTTOMS, ILLINOIS.

    (a) Project Purpose.--The project for flood control at Spunky 
Bottoms, Illinois, authorized by section 5 of the Flood Control Act of 
June 26, 1936 (35 Stat. 1584), is modified to add environmental 
restoration as a project purpose.
    (b) Maximum Amount.--The maximum amount of Federal funds that may 
be expended for the project for improvement of the quality of the 
environment, Spunky Bottoms, Illinois, being carried out under section 
1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a), 
shall be $7,500,000.
    (c) Limitation.--Nothing in this section shall affect the 
eligibility of the project for emergency repair assistance under 
section 5(a) of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction 
of certain public works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and 
for other purposes'', approved August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n).

SEC. 3037. EMIQUON, ILLINOIS.

    (a) Maximum Amount.--The maximum amount of Federal funds that may 
be expended for the project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Emiquon, 
Illinois, being carried out under section 206 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), shall be $7,500,000.
    (b) Limitation.--Nothing in this section shall affect the 
eligibility of the project for emergency repair assistance under 
section 5(a) of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction 
of certain public works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and 
for other purposes'', approved August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n).

SEC. 3038. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, INDIANA.

    The project for flood control, Little Calumet River, Indiana, 
authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4115), is modified to authorize the Secretary to carry 
out the project in accordance with the postauthorization change report 
dated August 2000, at a total cost of $186,300,000, with an estimated 
Federal cost of $136,600,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$49,700,000.

SEC. 3039. WHITE RIVER, INDIANA.

    The project for flood control, Indianapolis on West Fork of White 
River, Indiana, authorized by section 5 of the Act entitled ``An Act 
authorizing the construction of certain public works on rivers and 
harbors for flood control, and other purposes'', approved June 22, 1936 
(49 Stat. 1586), and modified by section 323 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3716) and section 322 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 303-304), is further 
modified to authorize the Secretary to undertake the riverfront 
alterations described in the Central Indianapolis Waterfront Concept 
Plan, dated February 1994, for the Fall Creek Reach feature, at a total 
cost of $28,545,000 and to direct the Secretary to credit toward the 
non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of planning, 
design, and construction work carried out by the non-Federal interest 
before the date of the partnership agreement for the project if the 
Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project.

SEC. 3040. WOLF LAKE, INDIANA.

    The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Wolf Lake, Indiana, 
being carried out under section 206 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), is modified to direct the Secretary to 
credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost 
of planning, design, and construction work carried out by the non-
Federal interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
project.

SEC. 3041. PRESTONSBURG, KENTUCKY.

    The Prestonsburg, Kentucky, element of the project for flood 
control, Levisa and Tug Fork of the Big Sandy and Cumberland Rivers, 
West Virginia, Virginia, and Kentucky, authorized by section 202(a) of 
the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1981 (94 Stat. 
1339), is modified to direct the Secretary to take measures to provide 
a 100-year level of flood protection for the city of Prestonsburg.

SEC. 3042. AMITE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, LOUISIANA, EAST BATON ROUGE 
              PARISH WATERSHED.

    The project for flood damage reduction and recreation, Amite River 
and Tributaries, Louisiana, East Baton Rouge Parish Watershed, 
authorized by section 101(a)(21) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1999 (113 Stat. 277) and modified by section 116 of Division D of 
Public Law 108-7 (117 Stat. 140), is further modified to direct the 
Secretary to carry out the project with the cost sharing for the 
project determined in accordance with section 103(a) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(a)), as in effect on 
October 11, 1996.

SEC. 3043. ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LOUISIANA.

    (a) In General.--Section 315(a)(1) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2603-2604) is amended to read as 
follows:
            ``(1) is authorized to study, design, construct, operate, 
        and maintain, at Federal expense, a Type A Regional Visitor 
        Center in the vicinity of Morgan City, Louisiana, in 
        consultation with the State of Louisiana, to provide 
        information to the public on the Atchafalaya River system and 
        other associated waterways that have influenced surrounding 
        communities, and national and local water resources development 
        of the Army Corps of Engineers in South Central Louisiana; 
        and''.
    (b) Technical Correction.--Section 315(b) of such Act is amended by 
striking ``(a)'' and inserting ``(a)(2)''.
    (c) Donations.--Section 315 of such Act is amended by adding at the 
end the following:
     ``(c) Donations.--In carrying out subsection (a)(1), the 
Mississippi River Commission is authorized to accept the donation of 
cash, funds, lands, materials, and services from non-Federal 
governmental entities and nonprofit corporations.''.

SEC. 3044. PUBLIC ACCESS, ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LOUISIANA.

    The public access feature of the Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, 
Louisiana, project, authorized by the Water Resources Development Act 
1986 (100 Stat. 4142), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
acquire from willing sellers the fee interest, exclusive of oil, gas, 
and minerals, of an additional 20,000 acres of land within the Lower 
Atchafalaya Basin Floodway for the public access feature of the 
Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, to enhance fish and wildlife 
resources, at a total cost of $4,000,000.

SEC. 3045. J. BENNETT JOHNSTON WATERWAY, MISSISSIPPI RIVER TO 
              SHREVEPORT, LOUISIANA.

    The project for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses, J. Bennett 
Johnston Waterway, Mississippi River to Shreveport, Louisiana, 
authorized by section 601(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4142) and modified by section 4(h) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4016), section 102(p) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4613), section 
301(b)(7) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 
3710), and section 316 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2572), is further modified to authorize the purchase and 
reforesting of lands which have been cleared or converted to 
agricultural uses.

SEC. 3046. MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION, LOUISIANA.

    The Mississippi Delta Region project, Louisiana, authorized as part 
of the project for hurricane-flood protection on Lake Pontchartrain, 
Louisiana, by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 
1077) and modified by section 365 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3739), is further modified to direct the 
Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project the costs of relocating oyster beds in the Davis Pond project 
area if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
Mississippi Delta Region project.

SEC. 3047. NEW ORLEANS TO VENICE, LOUISIANA.

    The New Orleans to Venice, Louisiana, project for hurricane 
protection, authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 
(76 Stat. 1184), is modified to authorize the Secretary to carry out 
the work on the St. Jude to City Price, Upper Reach A back levee. The 
Federal share of the cost of such work shall be 70 percent.

SEC. 3048. WEST BANK OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER (EAST OF HARVEY CANAL), 
              LOUISIANA.

    Section 328 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 304-305) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``operation and maintenance'' and 
                inserting ``operation, maintenance, rehabilitation, 
                repair, and replacement''; and
                    (B) by striking ``Algiers Channel'' and inserting 
                ``Algiers Canal Levees''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project shall be 35 percent.''.

SEC. 3049. CAMP ELLIS, SACO, MAINE.

    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for the 
project being carried out under section 111 of the River and Harbor Act 
of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 426i) for the mitigation of shore damages 
attributable to the project for navigation, Camp Ellis, Saco, Maine, 
shall be $10,000,000.

SEC. 3050. UNION RIVER, MAINE.

    The project for navigation, Union River, Maine, authorized by the 
first section of the Act entitled ``An Act making appropriations for 
the construction, repair, and preservation of certain public works on 
rivers and harbors, and for other purposes'', approved June 3, 1896 (29 
Stat. 215), is modified by redesignating as an anchorage area that 
portion of the project consisting of a 6-foot turning basin and lying 
northerly of a line commencing at a point N315,975.13, E1,004,424.86 
thence running north 61 degrees 27 minutes 20.71 seconds west about 
132.34 feet to a point N316,038.37, E1,004,308.61.

SEC. 3051. CASS RIVER, SPAULDING TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood damage reduction, Cass 
River, Spaulding Township, Saginaw County, Michigan, being carried out 
under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), is 
modified to incorporate flood control works constructed by the non-
Federal interests between Sheridan Road and East Street (M-13) if the 
Secretary determines that the inclusion of such flood control works is 
feasible.
    (b) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the project the cost of work carried out by the 
non-Federal interest before the date of the partnership agreement for 
the project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to 
the project.

SEC. 3052. DETROIT RIVER SHORELINE, DETROIT, MICHIGAN.

    (a) In General.--The project for emergency streambank and shoreline 
protection, Detroit River Shoreline, Detroit, Michigan, being carried 
out under section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r), 
is modified to include measures to enhance public access.
    (b) Maximum Federal Expenditure.--The maximum amount of Federal 
funds that may be expended for the project shall be $3,000,000.

SEC. 3053. WATER RESOURCES INSTITUTE, MUSKEGON, MICHIGAN.

    (a) In General.--The project for emergency streambank and shoreline 
protection, Water Resources Institute, Muskegon, Michigan, being 
carried out under section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 
U.S.C. 701r), is modified to provide for completion of shoreline 
protection measures in accordance with the approved plans and 
specifications for Grand Valley State University, Lake Michigan Center, 
dated August 6, 2001.
    (b) Maximum Federal Expenditure.--The maximum amount of Federal 
funds that may be expended for the project shall be $2,000,000.
    (c) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the project the cost of design and implementation 
of shoreline protection measures carried out by the non-Federal 
interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the project 
if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project.

SEC. 3054. SAGINAW RIVER, BAY CITY, MICHIGAN.

    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for the 
project for emergency streambank protection, Saginaw River, Bay City, 
Michigan, being carried out under section 14 of the Flood Control Act 
of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r), shall be $2,000,000.

SEC. 3055. ADA, MINNESOTA.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood damage reduction, Wild Rice 
River, Ada, Minnesota, being carried out under section 205 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to consider national ecosystem restoration benefits in 
determining the Federal interest in the project.
    (b) Evaluation of Benefits and Costs.--In evaluating the economic 
benefits and costs for the project, the Secretary shall not consider 
the emergency levee adjacent to Judicial Ditch No. 51 in the 
determination of conditions existing prior to construction of the 
project.
    (c) Special Rule.--In evaluating and implementing the project, the 
Secretary shall allow the non-Federal interest to participate in the 
financing of the project in accordance with section 903(c) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) to the extent that 
the Secretary's evaluation indicates that applying such section is 
necessary to implement the project.

SEC. 3056. DULUTH HARBOR, MCQUADE ROAD, MINNESOTA.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Duluth Harbor, McQuade 
Road, Minnesota, being carried out under section 107 of the River and 
Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577) and modified by section 321 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2605), is further 
modified to authorize the Secretary to provide public access and 
recreational facilities as generally described in the Detailed Project 
Report and Environmental Assessment, McQuade Road Harbor of Refuge, 
Duluth, Minnesota, dated August 1999.
    (b) Credit.--The Secretary shall provide credit toward the non-
Federal share of the cost of the project for the costs of design work 
carried out before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
project.
    (c) Maximum Federal Expenditure.--The maximum amount of Federal 
funds that may be expended for the project shall be $5,000,000.

SEC. 3057. GRAND PORTAGE HARBOR, MINNESOTA.

    The Secretary shall provide credit toward the non-Federal share of 
the cost of the navigation project for Grand Portage Harbor, Minnesota, 
carried out under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 
U.S.C. 577) and modified by section 312 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2605), for the costs of design work 
carried out before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
project.

SEC. 3058. GRANITE FALLS, MINNESOTA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is directed to implement under 
section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s) the 
locally preferred plan for flood damage reduction, Granite Falls, 
Minnesota, substantially in accordance with the detailed project report 
dated 2002, at a total cost of $12,000,000, with an estimated Federal 
cost of $8,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $4,000,000.
    (b) Project Financing.--In evaluating and implementing the project 
under this section, the Secretary shall allow the non-Federal interests 
to participate in the financing of the project in accordance with 
section 903(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4184), to the extent that the detailed project report evaluation 
indicates that applying such section is necessary to implement the 
project.
    (c) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal 
share of the project the cost of design and construction work carried 
out by the non-Federal interest before date of execution of a 
partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary determines that 
the work is integral to the project.
    (d) Maximum Funding.--The maximum amount of Federal funds that may 
be expended for the flood damage reduction shall be $8,000,000.

SEC. 3059. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA.

    Section 527 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2657) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a) by inserting after ``June 30, 1999'' 
        the following ``, and including Hennepin Island and adjacent 
        areas on the east side of the Mississippi River''; and
            (2) in subsection (c) by striking ``$10,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$25,000,000''.

SEC. 3060. RED LAKE RIVER, MINNESOTA.

    The project for flood control, Red Lake River at Crookston, 
Minnesota, authorized by section 101(a)(23) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 278), is modified to include flood 
protection for the adjacent and interconnected areas generally known as 
the Sampson and Chase/Loring neighborhoods, in accordance with the 
Feasibility Report Supplement, Local Flood Protection, Crookston, 
Minnesota, at a total cost of $25,000,000, with an estimated Federal 
cost of $16,250,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $8,750,000.

SEC. 3061. SILVER BAY, MINNESOTA.

    The project for navigation, Silver Bay, Minnesota, authorized by 
section 2 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 19), 
is modified to include operation and maintenance of the general 
navigation facilities as a Federal responsibility.

SEC. 3062. TACONITE HARBOR, MINNESOTA.

    The project for navigation, Taconite Harbor, Minnesota, carried out 
under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), 
is modified to include operation and maintenance of the general 
navigation facilities as a Federal responsibility.

SEC. 3063. TWO HARBORS, MINNESOTA.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Two Harbors, 
Minnesota, being carried out under section 107 of the River and Harbor 
Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), is modified to include construction of a 
dredged material disposal facility, including actions required to clear 
the site.
    (b) Lands, Easements, and Rights-of-Way.--Non-Federal interests 
shall be responsible for providing all lands, easements, rights-of-way, 
and relocations necessary for the construction of the dredged material 
disposal facility.
    (c) Maximum Federal Expenditure.--The maximum amount of Federal 
funds that may be expended for the project shall be $5,000,000.

SEC. 3064. DEER ISLAND, HARRISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.

    The project for ecosystem restoration, Deer Island, Harrison 
County, Mississippi, being carried out under section 204 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326) is modified to 
authorize the non-Federal interest to provide any portion of the non-
Federal share of the cost of the project in the form of services, 
materials, supplies, or other in-kind contributions.

SEC. 3065. BOIS BRULE DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, MISSOURI.

    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for the 
project for flood damage reduction, Bois Brule Drainage and Levee 
District, Missouri, being carried out under section 205 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), shall be $25,000,000.

SEC. 3066. SAND CREEK WATERSHED, WAHOO, NEBRASKA.

    The project for ecosystem restoration and flood damage reduction, 
Sand Creek watershed, Wahoo, Nebraska, authorized by section 101(b)(20) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2578), is 
modified--
            (1) to direct the Secretary to provide credit toward the 
        non-Federal share of the cost of the project or reimbursement 
        for the costs of any work that has been or will be performed by 
        the non-Federal interest before, on, or after the approval of 
        the project partnership agreement, including work performed by 
        the non-Federal interest in connection with the design and 
        construction of 7 upstream detention storage structures, if the 
        Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project;
            (2) to require that in-kind work to be credited under 
        paragraph (1) be subject to audit; and
            (3) to direct the Secretary to accept advance funds from 
        the non-Federal interest as needed to maintain the project 
        schedule.

SEC. 3067. ALAMOGORDO, NEW MEXICO.

    The Secretary shall review the general reevaluation report, dated 
March 1999, for the project for flood protection, Alamogordo, New 
Mexico, authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 
Stat. 85), and determine if the locally preferred flood detention basin 
would provide the same level of flood protection for the north side of 
the city of Alamogordo at a cost that is not greater than the cost of 
authorized channel improvements. If the Secretary determines that the 
flood detention basin is feasible, would provide the same level of 
flood protection, and can be constructed at the no additional cost, the 
Secretary may construct the flood detention basin instead of the 
channel improvements. The Federal share of the cost of the flood 
detention basin alternative shall be calculated in the same manner as 
if the channel improvements project was being constructed.

SEC. 3068. ORCHARD BEACH, BRONX, NEW YORK.

    The project for shoreline protection, Orchard Beach, Bronx, New 
York, authorized by section 554 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1996 (110 Stat. 3781), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
construct the project, at a total cost of $18,000,000.

SEC. 3069. TIMES BEACH, BUFFALO, NEW YORK.

    The project for improvement of the quality of the environment, 
Times Beach, Buffalo, New York, being carried out under section 1135 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4251), is 
modified to direct the Secretary to credit not more than $750,000 
toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project for the cost of 
planning, design, and construction work carried out by the non-Federal 
interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the project 
if the Secretary determines the work is integral to the project.

SEC. 3070. PORT OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY.

    The navigation project, Port of New York and New Jersey, New York 
and New Jersey, authorized by section 101(a)(2) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2576), is modified--
            (1) to authorize the Secretary to allow the non-Federal 
        interest to construct a temporary dredged material storage 
        facility to receive dredged material from the project if--
                    (A) the non-Federal interest submits, in writing, a 
                list of potential sites for the temporary storage 
                facility to the Committee on Transportation and 
                Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, the 
                Committee on Environment and Public Works of the 
                Senate, and the Secretary at least 180 days before the 
                selection of the final site; and
                    (B) at least 70 percent of the dredged material 
                generated in connection with the project suitable for 
                beneficial reuse will be used at sites in the State of 
New Jersey to the extent that there are sufficient sites available; and
            (2) to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-
        Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of 
        construction of the temporary storage facility if the Secretary 
        determines that the work is integral to the project.

SEC. 3071. NEW YORK STATE CANAL SYSTEM.

    Section 553(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3781) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(c) New York State Canal System Defined.--In this section, the 
term `New York State Canal System' means the 524 miles of navigable 
canal that comprise the New York State Canal System, including the 
Erie, Cayuga-Seneca, Oswego, and Champlain Canals and the historic 
alignments of these canals, including the cities of Albany and 
Buffalo.''.

SEC. 3072. ARCADIA LAKE, OKLAHOMA.

    Payments made by the city of Edmond, Oklahoma, to the Secretary in 
October 1999 of all costs associated with present and future water 
storage costs at Arcadia Lake, Oklahoma, under Arcadia Lake Water 
Storage Contract Number DACW56-79-C-002 shall satisfy the obligations 
of the city under that contract.

SEC. 3073. WILLAMETTE RIVER TEMPERATURE CONTROL, MCKENZIE SUBBASIN, 
              OREGON.

    (a) In General.--The project for environmental restoration, 
Willamette River Temperature Control, McKenzie Subbasin, Oregon, 
authorized by section 101(a)(25) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1996 (110 Stat. 3665) and modified by section 344 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 308), is further modified 
to direct the Secretary to pay, subject to the availability of 
appropriations, compensation for losses to small business attributable 
to the implementation of the drawdown conducted as a part of project 
implementation in 2002.
    (b) Establishment of Program.--Not later than 120 days after the 
date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall establish, and 
provide public notice of, a program--
            (1) to receive claims for compensation for losses to small 
        business attributable to the implementation of the drawdown 
        conducted as a part of project implementation in 2002;
            (2) to evaluate claims for such losses; and
            (3) to pay claims for such losses.
    (c) Implementation of Program.--In carrying out the program 
established under subsection (b), the Secretary shall provide--
            (1) public notice of the existence of the program 
        sufficient to reach those in the area that may have suffered 
        losses to small businesses;
            (2) a period for the submission of claims of not fewer than 
        45 days and not greater than 75 days from the date of the first 
        public notice of the existence of the program;
            (3) for the evaluation of each claim submitted to the 
        Secretary under the program and a determination of whether the 
        claim constitutes a loss to a small business on or before the 
        last day of the 30-day period beginning on the date of 
        submission of the claim; and
            (4) for the payment of each claim that the Secretary 
        determines constitutes a loss to a small business on or before 
        the last day of the 30-day period beginning on the date of the 
        Secretary's determination.
    (d) Loss to a Small Business Defined.--In this section, the term 
``loss to a small business'' means documented financial losses 
associated with commercial activity of a small business that can be 
attributed to the turbidity levels in the McKenzie River being higher 
than those anticipated in the original planning documents and public 
announcements existing before the initiation of the drawdown in 2002. 
Commercial losses include decline in sales, loss of revenue (including 
loss of revenue from canceled or delayed reservations at lodging 
establishments), and any other financial losses that can be shown to be 
associated with the elevated turbidity levels in the McKenzie River in 
2002.
    (e) Payment of Claims.--The payment of claims for losses to small 
businesses shall be a Federal responsibility.

SEC. 3074. FRENCH CREEK, UNION CITY DAM, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The project for flood control French Creek, Union City Dam, 
Pennsylvania, authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 
1962 (76 Stat. 1189), is modified to include recreation as a project 
purpose.

SEC. 3075. LACKAWANNA RIVER AT OLYPHANT, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The project for flood control, Lackawanna River at Olyphant, 
Pennsylvania, authorized by section 101(16) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4803), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to construct the project, at a total cost of $20,000,000.

SEC. 3076. LACKAWANNA RIVER AT SCRANTON, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The project for flood control, Lackawanna River at Scranton, 
Pennsylvania, authorized by section 101(17) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4803), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to construct the project, at a total cost of $23,000,000.

SEC. 3077. RAYSTOWN LAKE, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary may take such action as may be necessary, including 
construction of a breakwater, to prevent shoreline erosion between .07 
and 2.7 miles south of Pennsylvania State Route 994 on the east shore 
of Raystown Lake, Pennsylvania.

SEC. 3078. SHERADEN PARK STREAM AND CHARTIERS CREEK, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, 
              PENNSYLVANIA.

    The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Sheraden Park Stream 
and Chartiers Creek, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, being carried out 
under section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
U.S.C. 2330), is modified to direct the Secretary to credit up to 
$400,000 toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project for 
planning and design work carried out by the non-Federal interest before 
the date of the partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary 
determines that the work is integral to the project.

SEC. 3079. SOLOMON'S CREEK, WILKES-BARRE, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The project for flood control, Wyoming Valley, Pennsylvania, 
authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4124), is modified to include as a project element the 
project for flood control for Solomon's Creek, Wilkes-Barre, 
Pennsylvania.

SEC. 3080. SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 313(h)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(106 Stat. 4847; 109 Stat. 407; 117 Stat. 142) is amended by striking 
``Allegheny, Armstrong, Beford, Blair, Cambria, Clearfield, Fayette, 
Franklin, Fulton, Greene, Huntingdon, Indiana, Juniata, Mifflin, 
Somerset, Snyder, Washington, and Westmoreland Counties'' and inserting 
``Allegheny, Armstrong, Bedford, Blair, Cambria, Fayette, Franklin, 
Fulton, Greene, Huntingdon, Indiana, Juniata, Somerset, Washington, and 
Westmoreland Counties''.

SEC. 3081. WYOMING VALLEY, PENNSYLVANIA.

    In carrying out the project for flood control, Wyoming Valley, 
Pennsylvania, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4124), the Secretary shall 
coordinate with non-Federal interests to review opportunities for 
increased public access.

SEC. 3082. LITTLE LIMESTONE CREEK, JONESBOROUGH, TENNESSEE.

    In evaluating and implementing the project for flood damage 
reduction, Little Limestone Creek, Jonesborough, Tennessee, under 
section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), the 
Secretary shall allow the non-Federal interest to participate in the 
financing of the project in accordance with section 903(c) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184), to the extent that 
the Secretary's evaluation indicates that applying such section is 
necessary to implement the project.

SEC. 3083. CEDAR BAYOU, TEXAS.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Cedar Bayou, Texas, 
reauthorized by section 349(a)(2) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2632), is modified--
            (1) to authorize the Secretary to carry out the project to 
        a depth of 10 feet by 100 feet wide from mile 2.5 to mile 11 on 
        Cedar Bayou if the Secretary determines that the project is 
        feasible; and
            (2) to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-
        Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of planning 
        and design work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the 
        project if the Secretary determines that such work is integral 
        to the project.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--Cost sharing for construction and operation and 
maintenance of the project shall be determined in accordance with 
section 101 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2211).

SEC. 3084. LAKE KEMP, TEXAS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may not take any legal or 
administrative action seeking to remove a Lake Kemp improvement before 
the earlier of January 1, 2020, or the date of any transfer of 
ownership of the improvement occurring after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
    (b) Limitation on Liability.--The United States, or any of its 
officers, agents, or assignees, shall not be liable for any injury, 
loss, or damage accruing to the owners of a Lake Kemp improvement, 
their lessees, or occupants as a result of any flooding or inundation 
of such improvements by the waters of the Lake Kemp reservoir, or for 
such injury, loss, or damage as may occur through the operation and 
maintenance of the Lake Kemp dam and reservoir in any manner.
    (c) Lake Kemp Improvement Defined.--In this section, the term 
``Lake Kemp improvement'' means an improvement (including dwellings) 
located within the flowage easement of Lake Kemp, Texas, below 
elevation 1159 feet mean sea level.

SEC. 3085. LOWER RIO GRANDE BASIN, TEXAS.

    The project for flood control, Lower Rio Grande Basin, Texas, 
authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4125), is modified--
            (1) to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-
        Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of planning, 
        design, and construction work carried out by the non-Federal 
        interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
        project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral 
        to the project; and
            (2) to direct the Secretary, in calculating the non-Federal 
        share of the cost of the project, to make a determination under 
        section 103(m) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
        (33 U.S.C. 2213(m)) on the non-Federal interest's ability to 
        pay.

SEC. 3086. NORTH PADRE ISLAND, CORPUS CHRISTI BAY, TEXAS.

    The project for ecosystem restoration and storm damage reduction, 
North Padre Island, Corpus Christi Bay, Texas, authorized by section 
556 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 353), is 
modified to include recreation as a project purpose.

SEC. 3087. PROCTOR LAKE, TEXAS.

    The Secretary is authorized to convert flowage easements to fee 
simple title in the subdivisions of Buffalo Springs and Frees Lakeview, 
and adjacent areas, located within the boundaries necessary for the 
operation of the Proctor Lake project, Texas, authorized by section 203 
of the Flood Control Act of 1954 (68 Stat. 1259), and to purchase all 
improved and unimproved properties within such boundaries and to pay 
relocation assistance benefits to qualified landowners as applicable 
under the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real 
Property Acquisition Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.).

SEC. 3088. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.

    The project for flood control, San Antonio Channel, Texas, 
authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1954 (68 Stat. 
1259) as part of the comprehensive plan for flood protection on the 
Guadalupe and San Antonio Rivers in Texas and modified by section 103 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (90 Stat. 2921) and 
section 335 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 
2611), is further modified to authorize the Secretary to credit toward 
the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of 
construction work carried out by the non-Federal interest before the 
date of the partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary 
determines that the work is integral to the project.

SEC. 3089. ELIZABETH RIVER, CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA.

    Section 358 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 312) is amended by striking ``September 30, 1999'' and inserting 
``May 4, 1997''.

SEC. 3090. ROANOKE RIVER UPPER BASIN, VIRGINIA.

    The project for flood control, Roanoke River Upper Basin, Virginia, 
authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4126) and modified by section 110 of the Energy and 
Water Development Appropriations Act, 1990 (103 Stat. 650), is further 
modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project, at a 
total cost of $64,300,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$42,100,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $22,200,000. In 
carrying out the project, the Secretary shall award contracts based on 
invitation-for-bids procedures.

SEC. 3091. BLAIR AND SITCUM WATERWAYS, TACOMA HARBOR, WASHINGTON.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Blair and Sitcum 
Waterways, Tacoma Harbor, Washington, authorized by section 202(a) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4096) and 
deepened to 51 feet under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 
1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), is modified to direct the Secretary to review the 
locally prepared plan for the Blair and Sitcum Waterways, Washington, 
and, if the Secretary determines that the plan meets the evaluation and 
design standards of the Corps of Engineers and that the plan is 
feasible, to authorize the Secretary to carry out the plan, at a 
Federal cost of $4,240,000.
    (b) Non-Federal Work.--The Secretary shall provide credit toward 
the non-Federal share of the cost of the project, or reimbursement for, 
the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal interest before the 
date of the partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary 
determines that the work is integral to the project.

SEC. 3092. GREENBRIER RIVER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA.

    Section 579(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3790; 113 Stat. 312) is amended by striking ``$47,000,000'' and 
inserting ``$89,000,000''.

SEC. 3093. MANITOWOC HARBOR, WISCONSIN.

    The project for navigation, Manitowoc Harbor, Wisconsin, authorized 
by the River and Harbor Act of August 30, 1852, is modified to direct 
the Secretary to deepen the upstream reach of the navigation channel 
from 12 feet to 18 feet, at a total cost of $300,000.

SEC. 3094. MISSISSIPPI RIVER HEADWATERS RESERVOIRS.

    Section 21 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 
Stat. 4027) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``1276.42'' and inserting 
                ``1278.42'';
                    (B) by striking ``1218.31'' and inserting 
                ``1221.31''; and
                    (C) by striking ``1234.82'' and inserting 
                ``1235.30''; and
            (2) by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following:
    ``(b) Exception.--The Secretary may operate the headwaters 
reservoirs below the minimum or above the maximum water levels 
established in subsection (a) in accordance with water control 
regulation manuals (or revisions thereto) developed by the Secretary, 
after consultation with the Governor of Minnesota and affected tribal 
governments, landowners, and commercial and recreational users. The 
water control regulation manuals (and any revisions thereto) shall be 
effective when the Secretary transmits them to Congress. The Secretary 
shall report to Congress at least 14 days before operating any such 
headwaters reservoir below the minimum or above the maximum water level 
limits specified in subsection (a); except that notification is not 
required for operations necessary to prevent the loss of life or to 
ensure the safety of the dam or where the drawdown of lake levels is in 
anticipation of flood control operations.''.

SEC. 3095. CONTINUATION OF PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 1001(b)(2) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)), the following 
projects shall remain authorized to be carried out by the Secretary:
            (1) The project for navigation, Fall River Harbor, 
        Massachusetts, authorized by section 101 of the River and 
        Harbor Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 731).
            (2) The project for flood control, Agana River, Guam, 
        authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development 
        Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4127).
    (b) Limitation.--A project described in subsection (a) shall not be 
authorized for construction after the last day of the 5-year period 
beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, unless, during such 
period, funds have been obligated for the construction (including 
planning and design) of the project.

SEC. 3096. PROJECT REAUTHORIZATIONS.

    Each of the following projects may be carried out by the Secretary 
and no construction on any such project may be initiated until the 
Secretary determines that the project is feasible:
            (1) Menominee harbor and river, michigan and wisconsin.--
        The project for navigation, Menominee Harbor and River, 
        Michigan and Wisconsin, authorized by section 101 of the River 
        and Harbor Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 482) and deauthorized on April 
        15, 2002, in accordance with section 1001(b)(2) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)).
            (2) Manitowoc harbor, wisconsin.--That portion of the 
        project for navigation, Manitowoc Harbor, Wisconsin, consisting 
        of the channel in the south part of the outer harbor, 
deauthorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962 (76 
Stat. 1176).

SEC. 3097. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATIONS.

    (a) In General.--The following projects are not authorized after 
the date of enactment of this Act:
            (1) Bridgeport harbor, connecticut.--The portion of the 
        project for navigation, Bridgeport Harbor, Connecticut, 
        authorized by the River and Harbor Act of July 3, 1930 (46 
        Stat. 919), consisting of an 18-foot channel in Yellow Mill 
        River and described as follows: Beginning at a point along the 
        eastern limit of the existing project, N123,649.75, 
        E481,920.54, thence running northwesterly about 52.64 feet to a 
        point N123,683.03, E481,879.75, thence running northeasterly 
        about 1,442.21 feet to a point N125,030.08, E482,394.96, thence 
        running northeasterly about 139.52 feet to a point along the 
        east limit of the existing channel, N125,133.87, E482,488.19, 
        thence running southwesterly about 1,588.98 feet to the point 
        of origin.
            (2) Norwalk harbor, connecticut.--The following portions a 
        10-foot channel of the project for navigation, Norwalk Harbor, 
        Connecticut, authorized by the first section of the Rivers and 
        Harbors Appropriations Act of March 2, 1919 (40 Stat. 1276):
                    (A) An approximate rectangular shaped section along 
                the northwesterly terminus of the channel. The section 
                is 35-feet wide and about 460-feet long and is further 
                described as follows: Commencing at a point 
                N104,165.85, E417,662.71, thence running south 24 
                degrees 06 minutes 55 seconds east 395.00 feet to a 
                point N103,805.32, E417,824.10, thence running south 00 
                degrees 38 minutes 06 seconds east 87.84 feet to a 
                point N103,717.49, E417,825.07, thence running north 24 
                degrees 06 minutes 55 seconds west 480.00 feet, to a 
                point N104,155.59, E417.628.96, thence running north 73 
                degrees 05 minutes 25 seconds east 35.28 feet to the 
                point of origin.
                    (B) An area having the approximate shape of a 
                parallelogram along the northeasterly portion of the 
                channel, southeast of the area described in 
                subparagraph (A). This area is 20-feet wide and about 
                260-feet long and is further described as follows: 
                Commencing at a point N103,855.48, E417,849.99, thence 
                running south 33 degrees 07 minutes 30 seconds east 
                133.40 feet to a point N103,743.76, E417,922.89, thence 
                running south 24 degrees 07 minutes 04 seconds east 
                127.75 feet to a point N103,627.16, E417,975.09, thence 
                running north 33 degrees 07 minutes 30 seconds west 
                190.00 feet to a point N103,786.28, E417,871.26, thence 
                running north 17 degrees 05 minutes 15 seconds west 
                72.39 feet to the point of origin.
            (3) Chicago river and harbor, chicago, illinois.--Those 
        portions of the projects for navigation, Chicago River and 
        Chicago Harbor, Chicago, Illinois, authorized by the River and 
        Harbor Act of March 3, 1899 (30 Stat. 1129), extending 50 feet 
        riverward of the existing dock wall on the south side of the 
        channel from Lake Street to Franklin Street and 25 feet 
        riverward of the existing dock wall on the south side of the 
        channel from Franklin Street to Wabash Avenue, and those areas 
        within 20 feet of the bridge abutments on the south side of the 
        channel for the length of the protection bridge piers from the 
        Franklin Street Bridge to the Michigan Avenue Bridge.
            (4) Island end river, massachusetts.--The portion of the 
        project for navigation, Island End River, Massachusetts, 
        carried out under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 
        1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), described as follows: Beginning at a 
        point along the eastern limit of the existing project, 
        N507,348.98, E721,180.01, thence running northeast about 35 
        feet to a point N507,384.17, E721,183.36, thence running 
        northeast about 324 feet to a point N507,590.51, E721,433.17, 
        thence running northeast about 345 feet to a point along the 
        northern limit of the existing project, N507,927.29, 
        E721,510.29, thence running southeast about 25 feet to a point 
        N507,921.71, E721,534.66, thence running southwest about 354 
        feet to a point N507,576.65, E721,455.64, thence running 
        southwest about 357 feet to the point of origin.
            (5) City waterway, tacoma, washington.--The portion of the 
        project for navigation, City Waterway, Tacoma, Washington, 
        authorized by the first section of the River and Harbor 
        Appropriations Act of June 13, 1902 (32 Stat. 347), consisting 
        of the last 1,000 linear feet of the inner portion of the 
        waterway beginning at Station 70+00 and ending at Station 
        80+00.
    (b) Anchorage Area, New London Harbor, Connecticut.--The portion of 
the project for navigation, New London Harbor, Connecticut, authorized 
by the River and Harbor Appropriations Act of June 13, 1902 (32 Stat. 
333), that consists of a 23-foot waterfront channel and that is further 
described as beginning at a point along the western limit of the 
existing project, N188, 802.75, E779, 462.81, thence running 
northeasterly about 1,373.88 feet to a point N189, 554.87, E780, 
612.53, thence running southeasterly about 439.54 feet to a point N189, 
319.88, E780, 983.98, thence running southwesterly about 831.58 feet to 
a point N188, 864.63, E780, 288.08, thence running southeasterly about 
567.39 feet to a point N188, 301.88, E780, 360.49, thence running 
northwesterly about 1,027.96 feet to the point of origin, shall be 
redesignated as an anchorage area.
    (c) Norwalk Harbor, Connecticut.--The 10-foot channel portion of 
the Norwalk Harbor, Connecticut, navigation project described in 
subsection (a)(2) is modified to authorize the Secretary to realign the 
channel to include a new section immediately north of the area 
described in subsection (a)(2)(B). The new triangular shaped section is 
described as follows: Commencing at a point N103,968.35, E417,815.29, 
thence running south 17 degrees 05 minutes 15 seconds east 118.09 feet 
to a point N103,855.48, E417,849.99, thence running north 33 degrees 07 
minutes 30 seconds west 36.76 feet to a point N103,886.27, E417.829.90, 
thence running north 10 degrees 05 minutes 26 seconds west 83.37 feet 
to the point of origin.
    (d) Chicago River and Harbor, Chicago, Illinois.--The projects for 
navigation, Chicago River and Chicago Harbor referred to in subsection 
(a)(3) are modified to direct the Secretary to redefine the Federal 
navigation channel for the North Branch Canal portion extending from 
100 feet downstream of the Halsted Street Bridge to 100 feet upstream 
of the Division Street Bridge to be no wider than 66 feet.
    (e) Additional Deauthorizations.--The following projects are not 
authorized after the date of enactment of this Act, except with respect 
to any portion of such a project which portion has been completed 
before such date or is under construction on such date:
            (1) The project for flood damage reduction, Cache Creek 
        Basin, Clear Lake Outlet Channel, California, authorized by the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662).
            (2) The project for flood control, Goleta and Vicinity, 
        California, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1970.
            (3) The project to modify the Central and Southern Florida 
        project to improve water supply to the Everglades National 
        Park, Florida, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1954 
        (Public Law 83-780) and the Flood Control Act of 1968 (Public 
        Law 90-483).
            (4) The project for flood control, Central and Southern 
        Florida Project, Shingle Creek Basin, Florida, authorized by 
        the Flood Control Act of 1962.
            (5) The project for flood control, Middle Wabash, 
        Greenfield Bayou, Indiana, authorized by section 10 of the 
        Flood Control Act of 1946.
            (6) The project for flood damage reduction, Lake George, 
        Hobart, Indiana, authorized by section 602 of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662).
            (7) The project for flood damage reduction, Green Bay Levee 
        and Drainage District No. 2, Iowa, authorized by the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986, deauthorized in fiscal year 
        1991, and reauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act 
        of 1992 (Public Law 102-580).
            (8) The project for flood damage reduction, Hazard, 
        Kentucky, authorized by section 3 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1988 (Public Law 100-676) and section 108 of 
        the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-
        640).
            (9) The recreation portion of the project for flood 
        control, Taylorsville Lake, Kentucky, authorized by section 203 
        of the Flood Control Act of 1966.
            (10) The project for flood control, West Kentucky 
        Tributaries, Kentucky, authorized by the Flood Control Acts of 
        1965 and 1970 and the Water Resources Development Act of 1986.
            (11) The project for flood damage reduction, Bayou Cocodrie 
        and Tributaries, Louisiana, authorized by the Flood Control Act 
        of 1941 and the Water Resources Development Act of 1974.
            (12) The project for flood control, Eastern Rapides and 
        South-Central Avoyelles Parishes, Louisiana, authorized by the 
        Flood Control Act of 1970 (Public Law-611).
            (13) The project for Red River Waterway, Shreveport, 
        Louisiana to Daingerfield, Texas, authorized by the River and 
        Harbor Act of 1968 (Public Law 90-483).
            (14) The project for flood damage reduction Brockton, 
        Massachusetts, authorized by section 401(c) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662).
            (15) The project for navigation, Grand Haven Harbor, 
        Michigan, authorized by section 202 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662).
            (16) The project for navigation, Greenville Harbor, 
        Mississippi, authorized by section 601 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662).
            (17) The project for hydropower, Libby Dam, Montana, (Units 
        6-8), authorized by section 549 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-303).
            (18) The project for flood damage reduction, Platte River 
        Flood and Related Streambank Erosion Control, Nebraska, 
        authorized by section 603 of the Water Resources Development 
        Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662).
            (19) The project for navigation, Outer Harbor, Buffalo, New 
        York, authorized by section 110 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1992.
            (20) The project for flood damage reduction, Sugar Creek 
        Basin, North Carolina and South Carolina, authorized by section 
        401 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 
        99-662).
            (21) The project for flood control and recreation, 
        Fairfield, Ohio, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662).
            (22) The project for shoreline protection, Maumee Bay, Lake 
        Erie, Ohio, authorized by section 501(a) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986.
            (23) The project for flood control and water supply, Parker 
        Lake, Muddy Boggy Creek, Oklahoma, authorized by the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662).
            (24) The project for the Columbia River, Seafarers 
        Memorial, Hammond, Oregon, authorized by the Energy and Water 
        Development Appropriations Act of 1991.
            (25) The project for bulkhead repairs, Quonset Point-
        Davisville, Rhode Island, authorized by section 571 of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1996.
            (26) The project for flood damage reduction, Harris Fork 
        Creek, Tennessee and Kentucky, authorized by section 102 of the 
        Water Resources Development Acts of 1976 and 1986.
            (27) The project for flood damage reduction, Arroyo 
        Colorado, Texas, authorized by the Water Resources Development 
        Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662).
            (28) The project for flood damage reduction, Cypress Creek-
        Structural, Texas, authorized by the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1988.
            (29) The project for flood damage reduction, East Fork 
        Channel Improvement, Increment 2, East Fork of the Trinity 
        River, Texas, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1962.
            (30) The project for flood damage reduction, Falfurrias, 
        Texas, authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 
        1988.
            (31) The project for bank erosion, Kanawha River, 
        Charleston, West Virginia, authorized by section 603(f)(13) of 
        the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-
        662).
    (f) Conditions.--The first sentence of section 1001(b)(2) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``two years'' and inserting ``year''; and
            (2) by striking ``7'' and inserting ``5''.

SEC. 3098. LAND CONVEYANCES.

    (a) Milford, Kansas.--
            (1) In general.--Subject to the provisions of this section, 
        the Secretary shall convey by quitclaim deed without 
        consideration to the Geary County Fire Department, Milford, 
        Kansas, all right, title, and interest of the United States in 
        and to a parcel of land consisting of approximately 7.4 acres 
        located in Geary County, Kansas, for construction, operation, 
        and maintenance of a fire station.
            (2) Survey to obtain legal description.--The exact acreage 
        and the description of the real property referred to in 
        paragraph (1) shall be determined by a survey that is 
        satisfactory to the Secretary.
            (3) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that the 
        property conveyed under paragraph (1) ceases to be held in 
        public ownership or to be used for any purpose other than a 
        fire station, all right, title, and interest in and to the 
        property shall revert to the United States, at the option of 
        the United States.
    (b) Boardman, Oregon.--Section 501(g)(1) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3751) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``city of Boardman,'' and inserting ``the 
        Boardman Park and Recreation District, Boardman,''; and
            (2) by striking ``such city'' and inserting ``the city of 
        Boardman''.
    (c) Generally Applicable Provisions.--
            (1) Applicability of property screening provisions.--
        Section 2696 of title 10, United States Code, shall not apply 
        to any conveyance under this section.
            (2) Additional terms and conditions.--The Secretary may 
        require that any conveyance under this section be subject to 
        such additional terms and conditions as the Secretary considers 
        appropriate and necessary to protect the interests of the 
        United States.
            (3) Costs of conveyance.--An entity to which a conveyance 
        is made under this section shall be responsible for all 
        reasonable and necessary costs, including real estate 
        transaction and environmental compliance costs, associated with 
        the conveyance.
            (4) Liability.--An entity to which a conveyance is made 
        under this section shall hold the United States harmless from 
        any liability with respect to activities carried out, on or 
        after the date of the conveyance, on the real property 
        conveyed. The United States shall remain responsible for any 
        liability with respect to activities carried out, before such 
        date, on the real property conveyed.

SEC. 3099. EXTINGUISHMENT OF REVERSIONARY INTERESTS AND USE 
              RESTRICTIONS.

    (a) Idaho.--
            (1) In general.--With respect to each deed listed in 
        paragraph (2), the reversionary interests and use restrictions 
        relating to industrial use purposes are extinguished.
            (2) Affected deeds.--The deeds with the following county 
        auditor's file numbers are referred to in paragraph (1):
                    (A) Auditor's Instrument No. 399218 of Nez Perce 
                County, Idaho--2.07 acres.
                    (B) Auditor's Instrument No. 487437 of Nez Perce 
                County, Idaho--7.32 acres.
    (b) Old Hickory Lock and Dam, Cumberland River, Tennessee.--
            (1) Release of retained rights, interests, reservations.--
        With respect to land conveyed by the Secretary to the Tennessee 
        Society of Crippled Children and Adults, Incorporated (now 
        known as ``Easter Seals Tennessee''), at Old Hickory Lock and 
        Dam, Cumberland River, Tennessee, under section 211 of the 
        Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1087), the reversionary 
        interests and the use restrictions relating to recreation and 
        camping purposes are extinguished.
            (2) Instrument of release.--As soon as possible after the 
        date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall execute and 
        file in the appropriate office a deed of release, amended deed, 
        or other appropriate instrument effectuating the release of 
        interests required by paragraph (1).
    (c) No Effect of Other Rights.--Nothing in this section affects the 
remaining rights and interests of the Corps of Engineers for authorized 
project purposes.

SEC. 3100. LAND EXCHANGE, DISPOSAL AND ACQUISITION OF LANDS, ALLATOONA 
              LAKE, GEORGIA.

    (a) Land Exchange.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may exchange lands above 863 
        feet in elevation at Allatoona Lake, Georgia, identified in the 
        Real Estate Design Memorandum prepared by the Mobile district 
        engineer, April 5, 1996, and approved October 8, 1996, for 
        lands on the north side of Allatoona Lake that are needed for 
        wildlife management and for protection of the water quality and 
        overall environment of Allatoona Lake.
            (2) Terms and conditions.--The basis for all land exchanges 
        under this subsection shall be a fair market appraisal so that 
        lands exchanged are of equal value.
    (b) Disposal and Acquisition of Lands, Allatoona Lake, Georgia.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may also sell lands above 
        863 feet in elevation at Allatoona Lake, Georgia, identified in 
        the memorandum referred to in subsection (a)(1) and may use the 
        proceeds to pay costs associated with the purchase of lands 
        needed for wildlife management and for protection of the water 
        quality and overall environment of Allatoona Lake.
            (2) Terms and conditions.--Land sales and purchases to be 
        conducted under this subsection shall be subject to the 
        following terms and conditions:
                    (A) Lands acquired under this subsection shall be 
                by negotiated purchase from willing sellers only.
                    (B) The basis for all transactions under the 
                program shall be a fair market appraisal acceptable to 
                the Secretary.
                    (C) The purchasers shall share in the associated 
                environmental and real estate costs, to include surveys 
                and associated fees in accordance with the memorandum 
                referred to in subsection (a)(1).
                    (D) Any other conditions that the Secretary may 
                impose.
    (c) Repeal.--Section 325 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1992 (106 Stat. 4849) is repealed.

                           TITLE IV--STUDIES

SEC. 4001. JOHN GLENN GREAT LAKES BASIN PROGRAM.

    Section 455 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 330-332) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(g) In-Kind Contributions for Study.--The non-Federal interest 
may provide up to 100 percent of the non-Federal share required under 
subsection (f) in the form of services, materials, supplies, or other 
in-kind contributions.''.

SEC. 4002. ST. GEORGE HARBOR, ALASKA.

    The Secretary shall conduct, at Federal expense, a study to 
determine the feasibility of providing navigation improvements at St. 
George, Alaska.

SEC. 4003. SUSITNA RIVER, ALASKA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for hydropower, recreation, and related purposes 
on the Susitna River, Alaska.

SEC. 4004. SEARCY COUNTY, ARKANSAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
using Greers Ferry Lake as a water supply source for Searcy County, 
Arkansas.

SEC. 4005. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND ILLINOIS WATERWAY, ILLINOIS, 
              IOWA, MINNESOTA, MISSOURI, AND WISCONSIN.

    The Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report on the results of 
the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway Restructured System 
Navigation Feasibility Study, Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and 
Wisconsin, no later than July 1, 2004.

SEC. 4006. HAMILTON, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary is directed to continue planning, preconstruction, 
engineering, and design efforts on the Sacramento-San Joaquin River 
Basins Comprehensive Study-Hamilton City Flood Damage Reduction and 
Ecosystem Restoration Initial Project and shall include in the study an 
area 2 miles north and 4 miles south of State Highway 32.

SEC. 4007. OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA.

    Section 414 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2636) is amended by striking ``32 months'' and inserting ``44 
months''.

SEC. 4008. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive study to determine the 
feasibility of, and alternatives for, measures to protect water 
diversion facilities and fish protective screen facilities in the 
vicinity of river mile 178 on the Sacramento River, California.

SEC. 4009. SAN FRANCISCO BAY, SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of the beneficial use of dredged material from the San 
Francisco Bay in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California, 
including the benefits and impacts of salinity in the Delta and the 
benefits to navigation, flood damage reduction, ecosystem restoration, 
water quality, salinity control, water supply reliability, and 
recreation.
    (b) Cooperation.--In conducting the study, the Secretary shall 
cooperate with the California Department of Water Resources and 
appropriate Federal and State entities in developing options for the 
beneficial use of dredged material from San Francisco Bay for the 
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta area.
    (c) Review.--The study shall include a review of the feasibility of 
using Sherman Island as a rehandling site for levee maintenance 
material, as well as for ecosystem restoration. The review may include 
monitoring a pilot project using up to 150,000 cubic yards of dredged 
material and being carried out at the Sherman Island site, examining 
larger scale use of dredged materials from the San Francisco Bay and 
Suisun Bay Channel, and analyzing the feasibility of the potential use 
of saline materials from the San Francisco Bay for both rehandling and 
ecosystem restoration purposes.

SEC. 4010. TYBEE ISLAND, GEORGIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
including the northern end of Tybee Island extending from the north 
terminal groin to the mouth of Lazaretto Creek as a part of the project 
for beach erosion control, Tybee Island, Georgia, carried out under 
section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5).

SEC. 4011. CALUMET HARBOR, ILLINOIS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for navigation at Calumet Harbor, Illinois.

SEC. 4012. PADUCAH, KENTUCKY.

    The Secretary is authorized to complete a rehabilitation evaluation 
report for the project for flood damage reduction, Paducah, Kentucky, 
and, if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible, proceed 
to preconstruction engineering and design for rehabilitation of the 
project.

SEC. 4013. BASTROP-MOREHOUSE PARISH, LOUISIANA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply, Bastrop-Morehouse Parish, 
Louisiana.

SEC. 4014. WEST FELICIANA PARISH, LOUISIANA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for riverfront development, including enhanced 
public access, recreation, and environmental restoration, on the 
Mississippi River in West Feliciana Parish, Louisiana.

SEC. 4015. CITY OF MACKINAC ISLAND, MICHIGAN.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for navigation at the city of Mackinac Island, 
Michigan.

SEC. 4016. CHICAGO, ILLINOIS.

    Section 425(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2638) is amended by inserting ``Lake Michigan and'' before ``the 
Chicago River''.

SEC. 4017. SOUTH BRANCH, CHICAGO RIVER, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for ecosystem restoration at the South Fork of 
the South Branch of the Chicago River, Chicago, Illinois.

SEC. 4018. NORTHEAST MISSISSIPPI.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
modifying the project for navigation, Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, 
Alabama and Mississippi, to provide water supply for northeast 
Mississippi.

SEC. 4019. PUEBLO OF ZUNI, NEW MEXICO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects for water resources development, environmental 
restoration, and natural resources protection for the Pueblo of Zuni, 
New Mexico, under section 203 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
2000 (33 U.S.C. 2269).

SEC. 4020. HUDSON-RARITAN ESTUARY, NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY.

    In carrying out the study for environmental restoration, Hudson-
Raritan Estuary, New York and New Jersey, the Secretary shall establish 
and utilize watershed restoration teams composed of estuary restoration 
experts from the Corps of Engineers, the New Jersey Department of 
Environmental Protection, and the Port Authority of New York and New 
Jersey and other experts designated by the Secretary for the purpose of 
developing habitat restoration and water quality enhancement.

SEC. 4021. SAC AND FOX NATION, OKLAHOMA.

    The Secretary shall complete a water and related land resource 
conservation and management plan for the Sac and Fox Nation, Oklahoma, 
under section 203 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (33 
U.S.C. 2269).

SEC. 4022. SUTHERLIN, OREGON.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of water resources 
along Sutherlin Creek in the vicinity of Sutherlin, Oregon, to 
determine the feasibility of carrying out a project to restore and 
enhance aquatic resources using a combination of structural and 
bioengineering techniques and, if the Secretary determines that the 
project is feasible, may carry out the project.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $2,500,000.

SEC. 4023. TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OREGON.

    The Secretary shall conduct under section 216 of the Flood Control 
Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1830) a study of the project for navigation, 
Tillamook Bay and Bar, Oregon, authorized by the first section of the 
River and Harbor Appropriations Act of July 25, 1912 (37 Stat. 220), to 
investigate measures to address dangerous and hazardous wave and ocean 
conditions.

SEC. 4024. ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION AND FISH PASSAGE IMPROVEMENTS, OREGON.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of undertaking ecosystem restoration and fish passage 
improvements on rivers throughout the State of Oregon.
    (b) Requirements.--In carrying out the study, the Secretary shall--
            (1) work in coordination with the State of Oregon, local 
        governments, and other Federal agencies; and
            (2) place emphasis on--
                    (A) fish passage and conservation and restoration 
                strategies to benefit species that are listed or 
                proposed for listing as threatened or endangered 
                species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 
                U.S.C. 1531 et seq.); and
                    (B) other watershed restoration objectives.
    (c) Pilot Program.--
            (1) In general.--In conjunction with conducting the study 
        under subsection (a), the Secretary may carry out pilot 
        projects to demonstrate the effectiveness of ecosystem 
        restoration and fish passages.
            (2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
        to be appropriated $5,000,000 to carry out this subsection.

SEC. 4025. NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION AND 
              PROTECTION.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out aquatic ecosystem restoration and protection projects in 
the counties of Lackawanna, Lycoming, Susquehanna, Wyoming, Pike, 
Wayne, Sullivan, Bradford, Northumberland, Union, Snyder, and Montour, 
Pennsylvania, particularly as related to abandoned mine drainage 
abatement and reestablishment of stream and river channels.

SEC. 4026. GEORGETOWN AND WILLIAMSBURG COUNTIES, SOUTH CAROLINA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply for Georgetown and Williamsburg 
Counties, South Carolina, including the viability and practicality of 
constructing a desalinization water treatment facility to meet such 
water supply needs.

SEC. 4027. SABINE PASS TO GALVESTON BAY, TEXAS.

    In conducting a feasibility study for shore protection and related 
improvements between Sabine Pass and the entrance to Galveston Bay, 
Texas, the Secretary may include any benefits related to the use of 
State Highway 87 as an emergency evacuation route in the determination 
of national economic development benefits of the project.

SEC. 4028. GRAND COUNTY AND MOAB, UTAH.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply for Grand County and the city 
of Moab, Utah, including a review of the impact of current and future 
demands on the Spanish Valley Aquifer.

SEC. 4029. CHEHALIS RIVER BASIN, WASHINGTON.

    The Secretary shall conduct a river basin study for the Chehalis 
River basin, Washington, including a study of the uses of the basin's 
water resources to assist users in developing a fair and equitable 
distribution of such resources.

SEC. 4030. SPRAGUE, LINCOLN COUNTY, WASHINGTON.

    The Secretary may accept from the non-Federal interest to pay all 
or a part of the non-Federal share of the cost of feasibility study for 
the project for flood control in the vicinity of Sprague, Lincoln 
County, Washington, funds made available under any other Federal 
program if such use of the funds is permitted under the Federal 
program.

SEC. 4031. MONONGAHELA RIVER BASIN, NORTHERN WEST VIRGINIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out aquatic ecosystem restoration and protection projects in 
the watersheds of the Monongahela River basin lying within the counties 
of Hancock, Ohio, Marshall, Wetzel, Tyler, Pleasants, Wood, Doddridge, 
Monongalia, Marion, Harrison, Taylor, Barbour, Preston, Tucker, 
Mineral, Grant, Gilmer, Brooke, and Rithchie, West Virginia, 
particularly as related to abandoned mine drainage abatement.

SEC. 4032. WAUWATOSA, WISCONSIN.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction and environmental 
restoration, Menomonee River and Underwood Creek, Wauwatosa, Wisconsin.

                   TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

SEC. 5001. MAINTENANCE OF NAVIGATION CHANNELS.

    (a) In General.--Upon request of a non-Federal interest, the 
Secretary shall be responsible for maintenance of the following 
navigation channels and breakwaters constructed or improved by the non-
Federal interest if the Secretary determines that such maintenance is 
economically justified and environmentally acceptable and that the 
channel or breakwater was constructed in accordance with applicable 
permits and appropriate engineering and design standards:
            (1) Pix Bayou navigation channel, Chambers County, Texas.
            (2) Pidgeon Industrial Harbor, Pidgeon Industrial Park, 
        Memphis Harbor, Tennessee.
            (3) Racine Harbor, Wisconsin.
    (b) Completion of Assessment.--Not later than 6 months after the 
date of receipt of a request from a non-Federal interest for Federal 
assumption of maintenance of a channel listed in subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall make a determination as provided in subsection (a) and 
advise the non-Federal interest of the Secretary's determination.
    (c) Sabine-Neches Waterway, Texas.--The Secretary shall remove 
sunken vessels and debris between miles 35 and 43 of the Channel to 
Orange, Sabine-Neches Waterway, Texas, for the purpose of improving 
navigation safety and reducing the risk to the public.

SEC. 5002. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may provide technical, planning, and 
design assistance to non-Federal interests for carrying out watershed 
management, restoration, and development projects at the locations 
described in subsection (d).
    (b) Specific Measures.--Assistance provided under subsection (a) 
may be in support of non-Federal projects for the following purposes:
            (1) Management and restoration of water quality.
            (2) Control and remediation of toxic sediments.
            (3) Restoration of degraded streams, rivers, wetlands, and 
        other waterbodies to their natural condition as a means to 
        control flooding, excessive erosion, and sedimentation.
            (4) Protection and restoration of watersheds, including 
        urban watersheds.
            (5) Demonstration of technologies for nonstructural 
        measures to reduce destructive impacts of flooding.
    (c) Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
assistance provided under subsection (a) shall be 50 percent.
    (d) Project Locations.--The locations referred to in subsection (a) 
are the following:
            (1) Spring Branch watershed, Huntsville, Alabama.
            (2) Tuolumne County, California.
            (3) Cucamonga basin, Upland, California.
            (4) Kinkaid Lake, Jackson County, Illinois.
            (5) Those portions of the watersheds of the Concord, 
        Charles, Blackstone, Neponset, Taunton, Nashua, Shawsheen, and 
        Merrimack Rivers, Massachusetts, lying within the Interstate 
        Route 495 corridor.
            (6) Jackson Brook watershed, New Jersey.
            (7) Those portions of the watersheds of the Beaver, Upper 
        Ohio, Connoquenessing, Lower Allegheny, Kiskiminetas, Lower 
        Monongahela, Youghiogheny, Shenango, and Mahoning Rivers lying 
        within the counties of Beaver, Butler, Lawrence, and Mercer, 
        Pennsylvania.
            (8) Southampton Creek watershed, Southampton, Pennsylvania.
            (9) Unami Creek watershed, Milford Township, Pennsylvania.
            (10) Amite River basin, Louisiana.
            (11) Iberville Parish, East Atchafalaya River basin, 
        Louisiana.
            (12) Genesee River watershed, New York.
            (13) Tonawanda Creek watershed, New York.
            (14) Buffalo River watershed, New York.
            (15) Eighteenmile Creek watershed, Niagara County, New 
        York.
            (16) Cattaragus Creek watershed, New York.
            (17) Oswego River basin, New York.
            (18) Red River watershed, Louisiana.
            (19) Fountain Creek and tributaries, Colorado.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $15,000,000.

SEC. 5003. DAM SAFETY.

    (a) Assistance.--The Secretary may provide assistance to enhance 
dam safety at the following locations:
            (1) Mountain Park Dam, Mountain Park, Georgia.
            (2) Barber Dam, Ada County, Idaho.
            (3) Fish Creek Dam, Blaine County, Idaho.
            (4) Lost Valley Dam, Adams County, Idaho.
            (5) Salmon Falls Dam, Twin Falls County, Idaho.
            (6) Whaley Lake Dam, Pawling, New York.
            (7) Lake Carl Blackwell Dam, Stillwater, Oklahoma.
            (8) Dams in Mountain Lakes Park, Princeton Township, New 
        Jersey.
            (9) State Dam, Auburn, New York.
            (10) Candor Dam, Candor, New York.
    (b) Special Rule.--The assistance provided under subsection (a) for 
State Dam, Auburn, New York, shall be for a project for rehabilitation 
in accordance with the report on State Dam Rehabilitation, Owasco Lake 
Outlet, New York, dated March 1999, if the Secretary determines that 
the project is feasible.
    (c) Fern Ridge Dam, Oregon.--It is the sense of Congress that the 
Secretary should work to immediately remedy the situation at Fern Ridge 
Dam, Oregon, due to the rapid deterioration of the dam.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $6,000,000.

SEC. 5004. STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY EVALUATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Upon request of a non-Federal interest, the 
Secretary shall evaluate the structural integrity and effectiveness of 
a project for flood damage reduction and, if the Secretary determines 
that the project does not meet such minimum standards as the Secretary 
may establish and, absent action by the Secretary, the project will 
fail, the Secretary may take such action as may be necessary to restore 
the integrity and effectiveness of the project.
    (b) Priority.--The Secretary shall evaluate under subsection (a) 
the following projects:
            (1) Project for flood damage reduction, Arkansas River 
        Levees, river mile 205 to river mile 308.4, Arkansas.
            (2) Project for flood damage reduction, Marianna Borough, 
        Pennsylvania.
            (3) Project for flood damage reduction, Nonconnah Creek, 
        Tennessee.

SEC. 5005. FLOOD MITIGATION PRIORITY AREAS.

    Section 212(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (33 
U.S.C. 2332(e); 114 Stat. 2599) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (27);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (28) and 
        inserting a semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(29) La Crosse County, Wisconsin;
            ``(30) Crawford County, Wisconsin;
            ``(31) Buffalo County, Wisconsin;
            ``(32) Calhoun County, Illinois;
            ``(33) Saint Charles County, Missouri;
            ``(34) Saint Louis County, Missouri;
            ``(35) Dubuque County, Iowa;
            ``(36) Scott County, Iowa;
            ``(37) Rock Island County, Illinois;
            ``(38) Ascension Parish, Louisiana;
            ``(39) East Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana;
            ``(40) Iberville Parish, Louisiana; and
            ``(41) Livingston Parish, Louisiana.''.

SEC. 5006. ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR AUTHORIZED PROJECTS.

    Section 219(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4835; 110 Stat. 3757; 113 Stat. 334) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (7);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (8) and 
        inserting a semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(9) $20,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(20);
            ``(10) $20,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(25);
            ``(11) $15,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(26);
            ``(12) $7,800,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(27);
            ``(13) $18,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(31); and
            ``(14) $30,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(40).''.

SEC. 5007. EXPEDITED COMPLETION OF REPORTS AND CONSTRUCTION FOR CERTAIN 
              PROJECTS.

    The Secretary shall expedite completion of the reports and, if the 
Secretary determines the project is feasible, shall expedite completion 
of construction for the following projects:
            (1) Welch Point, Elk River, Cecil County, Maryland, being 
        carried out under section 535(a) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 348-349).
            (2) West View Shores, Cecil County, Maryland, being carried 
        out under section 521 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
        2000 (114. Stat. 2655).
            (3) Sylvan Beach Breakwater, Verona, Oneida County, New 
        York, being carried out under section 3 of the Act entitled 
        ``An Act authorizing Federal participation in the cost of 
        protecting the shores of publicly owned property'', approved 
        August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426g).
            (4) Fulmer Creek, Village of Mohawk, New York, being 
        carried out under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 
        (33 U.S.C. 701s).
            (5) Moyer Creek, Village of Frankfort, New York, being 
        carried out under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 
        (33 U.S.C. 701s).
            (6) Steele Creek, Village of Ilion, New York, being carried 
        out under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 
        U.S.C. 701s).
            (7) Oriskany Wildlife Management Area, Rome, New York, 
        being carried out under section 206 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330).
            (8) Whitney Point Lake, Otselic River, Whitney Point, New 
        York, being carried out under section 1135 of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a).
            (9) Newton Creek, Bainbridge, New York, being carried out 
        under section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 
        701r).
            (10) Chenango Lake, Chenango County, New York, being 
        carried out under section 206 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330).
            (11) Lucas Berg Pit, Worth, Illinois, being carried out as 
        part of the Calumet-Sag navigation project, authorized by 
        section 2 of the River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945 (59 
        Stat. 19), and modified by the first section of the River and 
        Harbor Act of July 24, 1946 (60 Stat. 636), and section 109 of 
        the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 302).

SEC. 5008. EXPEDITED COMPLETION OF REPORTS FOR CERTAIN PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall expedite completion of the 
reports for the following projects and, if the Secretary determines 
that a project is justified in the completed report, proceed directly 
to project preconstruction, engineering, and design:
            (1) Project for flood damage reduction and ecosystem 
        restoration, Sacramento and San Joaquin River basins, Hamilton, 
        California.
            (2) Project for ecosystem restoration, University Lake, 
        Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
            (3) Project for shoreline protection, Detroit River 
        Greenway Corridor, Detroit, Michigan.
            (4) Project for shoreline stabilization at Egmont Key, 
        Florida.
    (b) Special Rule.--In carrying out the project for shoreline 
stabilization at Egmont Key, Florida, referred to in subsection (a)(4), 
the Secretary shall waive any cost share to be provided by non-Federal 
interests for any portion of the project that benefits federally owned 
property.
    (c) Chesapeake, Maryland.--The Secretary shall expedite completion 
of the study being carried out under section 535(b) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 349) with respect to 
additional compensation to the city of Chesapeake, Maryland.

SEC. 5009. SOUTHEASTERN WATER RESOURCES ASSESSMENT.

    The Secretary may provide assistance to a coordinated effort by 
Federal, State, and local agencies, non-Federal and nonprofit entities, 
regional researchers, and other interested parties to assess the water 
resources and water resources needs of river basins and watersheds of 
the southeastern United States.

SEC. 5010. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.

    Section 1103(e)(7)(A) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (33 U.S.C. 652(e)(7)(A)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following: ``The non-Federal interest may provide the non-Federal share 
of the cost of the project in the form of services, materials, 
supplies, or other in-kind contributions.''.

SEC. 5011. MISSOURI AND MIDDLE MISSISSIPPI RIVERS ENHANCEMENT PROJECT.

    Section 514(g) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 343; 117 Stat. 142) is amended by striking ``and 2004'' and 
inserting ``through 2015''.

SEC. 5012. MEMBERSHIP OF MISSOURI RIVER TRUST.

    Section 904(b)(1)(B) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2708) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of clause (vii);
            (2) by redesignating clause (viii) as clause (ix); and
            (3) by inserting after clause (vii) the following:
                            ``(viii) rural water systems; and''.

SEC. 5013. GREAT LAKES FISHERY AND ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.

    Section 506(f)(3)(B) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(42 U.S.C. 1962d-22; 114 Stat. 2646) is amended by striking ``50 
percent'' and inserting ``100 percent''.

SEC. 5014. SUSQUEHANNA, DELAWARE, AND POTOMAC RIVER BASINS.

    (a) Ex Officio Member.--Notwithstanding section 3001(a) of the 1997 
Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Recovery From Natural 
Disasters, and for Overseas Peacekeeping Efforts, Including Those in 
Bosnia (111 Stat. 176) and section 2.2 of both the Susquehanna River 
Basin Compact (Public Law 91-575) and the Delaware River Basin Compact 
(Public Law 87-328), beginning in fiscal year 2002 and thereafter, the 
Division Engineer, North Atlantic Division, Corps of Engineers, shall 
be the ex officio United States member under the Susquehanna River 
Basin Compact and the Delaware River Basin Compact, who shall serve 
without additional compensation and who may designate an alternate 
member or members in accordance with the terms of those respective 
compacts.
    (b) Authorization To Allocate.--The Secretary may allocate funds to 
the Susquehanna River Basin Commission, Delaware River Basin 
Commission, and the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 
(Potomac River Basin Compact (Public Law 91-407)) to fulfill the 
equitable funding requirements of their respective interstate compacts.
    (c) Water Supply and Conservation Storage.--The Secretary shall 
enter into an agreement with the Delaware River Basin Commission to 
provide temporary water supply and conservation storage at the Francis 
E. Walter Dam, Pennsylvania, during any period in which the Commission 
has determined that a drought warning or drought emergency exists. The 
agreement shall provide that the cost for any such water supply and 
conservation storage shall not exceed the incremental operating costs 
associated with providing the storage.

SEC. 5015. CHESAPEAKE BAY ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND PROTECTION 
              PROGRAM.

    Section 510(i) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3761) is amended by striking ``$10,000,000'' and inserting 
``$30,000,000''.

SEC. 5016. MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA.

    The Secretary shall review the navigation and aquatic ecosystem 
restoration components of the Montgomery Riverfront and Downtown Master 
Plan, Montgomery, Alabama, dated May 2001, and prepared by the non-
Federal interest and, if the Secretary determines that those components 
meet the evaluation and design standards of the Corps of Engineers and 
that the components are feasible, may carry out the components at a 
Federal cost not to exceed $5,000,000.

SEC. 5017. PINHOOK CREEK, HUNTSVILLE, ALABAMA.

    The Secretary shall design and construct the locally preferred plan 
for flood protection at Pinhook Creek, Huntsville, Alabama, under the 
authority of section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 
701s). The Secretary shall allow the non-Federal interest to 
participate in the financing of the project in accordance with section 
903(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) 
to the extent that the Secretary's evaluation indicates that applying 
such section is necessary to implement the project.

SEC. 5018. ALASKA.

    Section 570 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 369) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (e)(3)(B) by striking the last sentence;
            (2) in subsection (h) by striking ``$25,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$40,000,000''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(i) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project 
undertaken under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a 
nonprofit entity, with the consent of the affected local government.
    ``(j) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Ten percent of the amounts 
appropriated to carry out this section may be used by the Corps of 
Engineers district offices to administer projects under this section at 
100 percent Federal expense.''.

SEC. 5019. AKUTAN SMALL BOAT HARBOR, ALASKA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall expedite the study for the 
Akutan Small Boat Harbor, Alaska, and upon completion of the 
feasibility study, shall design and construct the project, if the 
Secretary determines that the project is feasible.
    (b) Treatment of Certain Dredging.--The headlands dredging for the 
mooring basin shall be considered general navigation feature for 
purposes of estimating the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project.

SEC. 5020. LOWELL CREEK TUNNEL, SEWARD, ALASKA.

    (a) Long-Term Maintenance and Repair.--The Secretary shall assume 
responsibility for the long-term maintenance and repair of the Lowell 
Creek Tunnel.
    (b) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
whether alternative methods of flood diversion in Lowell Canyon are 
feasible.

SEC. 5021. ST. HERMAN AND ST. PAUL HARBORS, KODIAK, ALASKA.

    The Secretary shall carry out, on an emergency basis, necessary 
removal of rubble, sediment, and rock that are impeding the entrance to 
the St. Herman and St. Paul Harbors, Kodiak, Alaska, at a Federal cost 
of $2,000,000.

SEC. 5022. AUGUSTA AND CLARENDON, ARKANSAS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to perform operation, 
maintenance, and rehabilitation of authorized and completed levees on 
the White River between Augusta and Clarendon, Arkansas.
    (b) Reimbursement.--After performing the operation, maintenance, 
and rehabilitation under subsection (a), the Secretary shall seek 
reimbursement from the Secretary of the Interior of an amount equal to 
the costs allocated to benefits to a Federal wildlife refuge of such 
operation, maintenance, and rehabilitation.

SEC. 5023. LOOMIS LANDING, ARKANSAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of shore damage in the vicinity 
of Loomis Landing, Arkansas, to determine if the damage is the result 
of a Federal navigation project, and, if the Secretary determines that 
the damage is the result of a Federal navigation project, the Secretary 
shall carry out a project to mitigate the damage under section 111 of 
the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 426i).

SEC. 5024. MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION PROJECT, ARKANSAS 
              AND OKLAHOMA.

    The McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River navigation and comprehensive 
development project, Arkansas and Oklahoma, authorized by the Act 
entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction of certain public works 
on rivers and harbors for flood control, and for other purposes'', 
approved June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1215), and the first section of the 
River and Harbor Act of 1946 (60 Stat. 364) and modified by section 108 
of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1988 (101 Stat. 
1329-112), is further modified to authorize a project depth of 12 feet 
in the States of Arkansas and Oklahoma.

SEC. 5025. ST. FRANCIS RIVER BASIN, ARKANSAS AND MISSOURI.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of increased siltation and 
streambank erosion in the St. Francis River basin, Arkansas and 
Missouri, to determine if the siltation or erosion, or both, are the 
result of a Federal flood control project and, if the Secretary 
determines that the siltation or erosion, or both, are the result of a 
Federal flood control project, the Secretary shall carry out a project 
to mitigate the siltation or erosion, or both.

SEC. 5026. CAMBRIA, CALIFORNIA.

    Section 219(f)(48) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(114 Stat. 2763A-220) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$10,300,000'' and inserting the 
        following:
                    ``(A) In general.--$10,300,000'';
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward 
                the non-Federal share of the cost of the project not to 
                exceed $3,000,000 for the cost of planning and design 
                work carried out by the non-Federal interest before the 
                date of the partnership agreement for the project if 
                the Secretary determines that the work is integral to 
                the project.''; and
            (3) by aligning the remainder of the text of subparagraph 
        (A) (as designated by paragraph (1) of this section) with 
        subparagraph (B) (as added by paragraph (2) of this section).

SEC. 5027. CONTRA COSTA CANAL, OAKLEY AND KNIGHTSEN, CALIFORNIA; 
              MALLARD SLOUGH, PITTSBURG, CALIFORNIA.

    Sections 512 and 514 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2650) are each amended by adding at the end the following: 
``All planning, study, design, and construction on the project shall be 
carried out by the office of the district engineer, San Francisco, 
California.''.

SEC. 5028. EAST SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

    Section 219(f)(22) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(106 Stat. 4835-4836; 113 Stat. 336) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$25,000,000'' and inserting the 
        following:
                    ``(A) In general.--$25,000,000'';
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward 
                the non-Federal share of the cost of the project (i) 
the cost of design and construction work carried out by the non-Federal 
interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the project 
if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project; 
and (ii) the cost of in-kind services and materials provided for the 
project by the non-Federal interest.
                    ``(C) In-kind contributions.--The non-Federal 
                interest may provide any portion of the non-Federal 
                share of the cost of the project in the form of 
                services, materials, supplies, or other in-kind 
                contributions.''; and
            (3) by aligning the remainder of the text of subparagraph 
        (A) (as designated by paragraph (1) of this section) with 
        subparagraph (B) (as added by paragraph (2) of this section).

SEC. 5029. SACRAMENTO AREA, CALIFORNIA.

    Section 219(f)(23) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(106 Stat. 4835-4836; 113 Stat. 336) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$25,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$35,000,000'';
            (2) by inserting ``water supply and'' before ``regional''; 
        and
            (3) by adding at the end the following: ``$________________ 
        for wastewater and water supply infrastructure in the counties 
        of Modoc, Lassen, Plumas, Butte, Sierra, Nevada, El Dorado, and 
        Placer, California.''.

SEC. 5030. SACRAMENTO DEEP WATER SHIP CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to transfer title to 
the Bascule Bridge, deauthorized by section 347(a)(2) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2000 (114. Stat. 2618), to the city of 
West Sacramento, California, subject to the execution of an agreement 
by the Secretary and the city which specifies the terms and conditions 
for such transfer. The terms and conditions of the transfer shall 
include a provision authorizing the Secretary to participate in the 
construction of a replacement bridge following the removal of the 
Bascule Bridge.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriation.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $5,000,000 for the Secretary to participate in the 
construction of a replacement bridge under this section.

SEC. 5031. SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Pier 70 Wharf 5 Removal and Dredging Project.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the 
        Port of San Francisco, shall carry out the project for removal 
        of Wharf 5 and associated pilings and dredgings at Pier 70 in 
        San Francisco, California, substantially in accordance with the 
        Port's redevelopment plans.
            (2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
        to be appropriated $1,600,000 to carry out this subsection.
    (b) Piers 94-96 Repairs Project.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the 
        Port of San Francisco, California, may carry out the project 
        for repairs to Piers 94-96 in San Francisco, California, 
        substantially in accordance with the Port's redevelopment plan.
            (2) Authorization of appropriation.--There is authorized to 
        be appropriated $5,000,000 to carry out this subsection.
    (c) Capital Improvement Project.--
            (1) Establishment of office.--The Secretary shall establish 
        a centralized office at the office of the district engineer, 
        San Francisco, California, for the use of all Federal and State 
        agencies that are or will be involved in issuing permits and 
        conducting environmental reviews for the capital improvement 
        project to repair and upgrade the water supply and delivery 
        system for the city of San Francisco.
            (2) Contributions.--The Secretary may use the authority 
        under section 214 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
        2000 (33 U.S.C. 2201 note) for the project described in 
        paragraph (1).
            (3) Protection of impartial decisionmaking.--In carrying 
        out this subsection, the Secretary and the heads of Federal 
        agencies receiving funds under such section 214 for the project 
        described in paragraph (1) shall ensure that the use of the 
        funds accepted under such section for such project will not 
        impact impartial decisionmaking with respect to the issuance of 
        permits, either substantively or procedurally, or diminish, 
        modify, or otherwise affect the statutory or regulatory 
        authorities of such agencies.

SEC. 5032. SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, WATERFRONT AREA.

    (a) Area To Be Declared Nonnavigable; Public Interest.--Unless the 
Secretary finds, after consultation with local and regional public 
officials (including local and regional public planning organizations), 
that the proposed projects to be undertaken within the boundaries of 
the portion of the San Francisco, California, waterfront area described 
in subsection (b) are not in the public interest, such portion is 
declared to be nonnavigable waters of the United States.
    (b) Northern Embarcadero South of Bryant Street.--The portion of 
the San Francisco, California, waterfront area referred to in 
subsection (a) is as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the 
northwesterly line of Bryant Street with the southwesterly line of 
Spear Street, which intersection lies on the line of jurisdiction of 
the San Francisco Port Authority; following thence westerly and 
southerly along said line of jurisdiction as described in the State of 
California Harbor and Navigable Code Section 1770, as amended in 1961, 
to its intersection with the easterly line of Townsend Street produced 
southerly; thence northerly along said easterly line of Townsend Street 
produced to its intersection with the United States Government pier-
head line; thence following said pier-head line westerly and northerly 
to its intersection with the existing boundary line of Piers 30/32, 
then northerly and easterly along the existing boundary of Piers 30/32 
until its intersection with the United States Government pier-head 
line, thence following said pier-head line westerly and northerly to 
the northwesterly line of Bryant Street produced northwesterly; thence 
southwesterly along said northwesterly line of Bryant Street produced 
to the point of beginning.
    (c) Requirement That Area Be Improved.--The declaration of 
nonnavigability under subsection (a) applies only to those parts of the 
area described in subsection (b) that are or will be bulkheaded, 
filled, or otherwise occupied by permanent structures and does not 
affect the applicability of any Federal statute or regulation 
applicable to such parts the day before the date of enactment of this 
Act, including sections 9 and 10 of the Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 
401 and 403; 30 Stat. 1151), commonly known as the Rivers and Harbors 
Appropriation Act of 1899, section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution 
Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1344), and the National Environmental Policy Act 
of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
    (d) Expiration Date.--If, 20 years from the date of enactment of 
this Act, any area or part thereof described in subsection (b) is not 
bulkheaded or filled or occupied by permanent structures, including 
marina facilities, in accordance with the requirements set out in 
subsection (c), or if work in connection with any activity permitted in 
subsection (c) is not commenced within 5 years after issuance of such 
permits, then the declaration of nonnavigability for such area or part 
thereof shall expire.

SEC. 5033. STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Reevaluation.--The Secretary shall reevaluate the feasibility 
of the Lower Mosher Slough element and the levee extensions on the 
Upper Calaveras River element of the project for flood control, 
Stockton Metropolitan Area, California, carried out under section 
211(f)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 
3683), to determine the eligibility of such elements for reimbursement 
under section 211 of such Act (33 U.S.C. 701b-13).
    (b) Special Rules for Reevaluation.--In conducting the reevaluation 
under subsection (a), the Secretary shall not reject a feasibility 
determination based on policies of the Corps of Engineers concerning 
the frequency of flooding, the drainage area, and the amount of runoff.
    (c) Reimbursement.--If the Secretary determines that the elements 
referred to subsection (a) are feasible, the Secretary shall reimburse, 
subject to appropriations, the non-Federal interest under section 211 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 for the Federal share of 
the cost of such elements.

SEC. 5034. CHARLES HERVEY TOWNSHEND BREAKWATER, CONNECTICUT.

    The western breakwater for the project for navigation, New Haven 
Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by the 1st section of the Act entitled 
``An Act making appropriations for the construction, repair, and 
preservation of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for 
other purposes'', approved September 19, 1890 (26 Stat. 426), shall be 
known and designated as the ``Charles Hervey Townshend Breakwater''.

SEC. 5035. EVERGLADES RESTORATION, FLORIDA.

    (a) Comprehensive Plan.--
            (1) Hillsboro and okeechobee aquifer.--Section 601(b)(2)(A) 
        of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2681) 
        is amended--
                    (A) in clause (i) by adding at the end the 
                following: ``The project for aquifer storage and 
                recovery, Hillsboro and Okeechobee Aquifer, Florida, 
                authorized by section 101(a)(16) of the Water Resources 
                Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 276), shall be 
                treated for purposes of this section as being in the 
                Plan.''; and
                    (B) in clause (iii) by inserting after 
                ``subparagraph (B)'' the following: ``and the project 
                for aquifer storage and recovery, Hillsboro and 
                Okeechobee Aquifer''.
            (2) Outreach and assistance.--Section 601(k) of such Act 
        (114 Stat. 2691-2692) is amended by adding at the end the 
        following:
            ``(3) Maximum expenditures.--The Secretary may expend up to 
        $3,000,000 per fiscal year for fiscal years beginning after 
        September 30, 2002, to carry out this subsection.''.
    (b) Critical Restoration Projects.--Section 528(b)(3)(C) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3769; 113 Stat. 286) 
is amended--
            (1) in clause (i) by striking ``$75,000,000'' and all that 
        follows through ``2003'' and inserting ``$95,000,000''; and
            (2) in clause (ii) by striking ``$25,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$30,000,000''.

SEC. 5036. FLORIDA KEYS WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS.

    Section 109(e)(2) of Division B of the Miscellaneous Appropriations 
Act, 2001 (enacted into law by Public Law 106-554) (114 Stat. 2763A-
222) is amended by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) Credit for work prior to execution of the 
                partnership agreement.--The Secretary shall credit 
                toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project 
                (i) the cost of construction work carried out by the 
                non-Federal interest before the date of the partnership 
                agreement for the project if the Secretary determines 
                that the work is integral to the project; and (ii) the 
                cost of land acquisition carried out by the non-Federal 
                interest for projects to be carried out under this 
                section.''.

SEC. 5037. LAKE WORTH, FLORIDA.

    The Secretary may carry out necessary repairs for the Lake Worth 
bulkhead replacement project, West Palm Beach, Florida, at an estimated 
total cost of $9,000,000.

SEC. 5038. LAKE LANIER, GEORGIA.

    The Secretary may assist local interests with planning, design, and 
construction of facilities at the Lake Lanier Olympic Center, Georgia, 
in support of the 2003 World Kayaking Championships, at a total cost of 
$5,300,000.

SEC. 5039. RILEY CREEK RECREATION AREA, IDAHO.

    The Secretary is authorized to carry out the Riley Creek Recreation 
Area Operation Plan of the Albeni Falls Management Plan, dated October 
2001, for the Riley Creek Recreation Area, Albeni Falls Dam, Bonner 
County, Idaho.

SEC. 5040. RECONSTRUCTION OF ILLINOIS FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may participate in the 
reconstruction of an eligible flood control project if the Secretary 
determines that such reconstruction is not required as a result of 
improper operation and maintenance of the project by the non-Federal 
interest.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the costs for the 
reconstruction of a flood control project authorized by this section 
shall be the same Federal share that was applicable to construction of 
the project. The non-Federal interest shall be responsible for 
operation and maintenance and repair of a project for which 
reconstruction is undertaken under this section.
    (c) Reconstruction Defined.--In this section, the term 
``reconstruction'', as used with respect to a project, means addressing 
major project deficiencies caused by long-term degradation of the 
foundation, construction materials, or engineering systems or 
components of the project, the results of which render the project at 
risk of not performing in compliance with its authorized project 
purposes. In addressing such deficiencies, the Secretary may 
incorporate current design standards and efficiency improvements, 
including the replacement of obsolete mechanical and electrical 
components at pumping stations, if such incorporation does not 
significantly change the scope, function, and purpose of the project as 
authorized.
    (d) Eligible Projects.--The following flood control projects are 
eligible for reconstruction under this section:
            (1) Wood River Drainage and Levee District, Illinois, 
        authorized as part of the navigation project of the Upper 
        Mississippi River basin by section 2 of the Flood Control Act 
        of June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1218).
            (2) Clear Creek Drainage and Levee District, Illinois, 
        authorized by section 5 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 
        1936 (49 Stat. 1581).
            (3) Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District, 
        Illinois, authorized as part of the navigation project of the 
        Upper Mississippi River basin by section 2 of the Flood Control 
        Act of June 22, 1938 (52 Stat. 1218).
    (e) Justification.--The reconstruction of a project authorized by 
this section shall not be considered a separable element of the 
project.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriation.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $15,000,000 to carry out this section. Such sums shall 
remain available until expended.

SEC. 5041. KASKASKIA RIVER BASIN, ILLINOIS, RESTORATION.

    (a) Kaskaskia River Basin Defined.--In this section, the term 
``Kaskaskia River basin'' means the Kaskaskia River, Illinois, its 
backwaters, its side channels, and all tributaries, including their 
watersheds, draining into the Kaskaskia River.
    (b) Comprehensive Plan.--
            (1) Development.--The Secretary shall develop, as 
        expeditiously as practicable, a comprehensive plan for the 
        purpose of restoring, preserving, and protecting the Kaskaskia 
        River basin.
            (2) Technologies and innovative approaches.--The 
        comprehensive plan shall provide for the development of new 
        technologies and innovative approaches--
                    (A) to enhance the Kaskaskia River as a 
                transportation corridor;
                    (B) to improve water quality within the entire 
                Kaskaskia River basin;
                    (C) to restore, enhance, and preserve habitat for 
                plants and wildlife;
                    (D) to increase economic opportunity for 
                agriculture and business communities; and
                    (E) to reduce the impacts of flooding to 
                communities and landowners.
            (3) Specific components.--The comprehensive plan shall 
        include such features as are necessary to provide for--
                    (A) the development and implementation of a program 
                for sediment removal technology, sediment 
                characterization, sediment transport, and beneficial 
                uses of sediment;
                    (B) the development and implementation of a program 
                for the planning, conservation, evaluation, and 
                construction of measures for fish and wildlife habitat 
                conservation and rehabilitation, and stabilization and 
                enhancement of land and water resources in the basin;
                    (C) the development and implementation of a long-
                term resource monitoring program;
                    (D) the development and implementation of a 
                computerized inventory and analysis system; and
                    (E) the development and implementation of a 
                systemic plan to reduce flood impacts by means of 
                ecosystem restoration projects.
            (4) Consultation.--The comprehensive plan shall be 
        developed by the Secretary in consultation with appropriate 
        Federal agencies, the State of Illinois, and the Kaskaskia 
        River Coordinating Council.
            (5) Report to congress.--Not later than 2 years after the 
        date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to 
        Congress a report containing the comprehensive plan.
            (6) Additional studies and analyses.--After transmission of 
        a report under paragraph (5), the Secretary shall conduct 
        studies and analyses of projects related to the comprehensive 
        plan that are appropriate and consistent with this subsection.
    (c) General Provisions.--
            (1) Water quality.--In carrying out activities under this 
        section, the Secretary's recommendations shall be consistent 
with applicable State water quality standards.
            (2) Public participation.--In developing the comprehensive 
        plan under subsection (b), the Secretary shall implement 
        procedures to facilitate public participation, including 
        providing advance notice of meetings, providing adequate 
        opportunity for public input and comment, maintaining 
        appropriate records, and making a record of the proceedings of 
        meetings available for public inspection.
    (d) Coordination.--The Secretary shall integrate activities carried 
out under this section with ongoing Federal and State programs, 
projects, and activities, including the following:
            (1) Farm programs of the Department of Agriculture.
            (2) Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (State of 
        Illinois) and Conservation 2000 Ecosystem Program of the 
        Illinois Department of Natural Resources.
            (3) Conservation 2000 Conservation Practices Program and 
        the Livestock Management Facilities Act administered by the 
        Illinois Department of Agriculture.
            (4) National Buffer Initiative of the Natural Resources 
        Conservation Service.
            (5) Nonpoint source grant program administered by the 
        Illinois Environmental Protection Agency.
    (e) Cost Sharing.--
            (1) In general.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
        activities carried out under this section shall be 35 percent.
            (2) In-kind services.--The Secretary may credit the cost of 
        in-kind services provided by the non-Federal interest for an 
        activity carried out under this section toward not more than 80 
        percent of the non-Federal share of the cost of the activity. 
        In-kind services shall include all State funds expended on 
        programs that accomplish the goals of this section, as 
        determined by the Secretary. The programs may include the 
        Kaskaskia River Conservation Reserve Program, the Illinois 
        Conservation 2000 Program, the Open Lands Trust Fund, and other 
        appropriate programs carried out in the Kaskaskia River basin.

SEC. 5042. NATALIE CREEK, MIDLOTHIAN AND OAK FOREST, ILLINOIS.

    The Secretary shall carry out a project for flood damage reduction 
under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s) 
Natalie Creek, Midlothian and Oak Forest, Illinois, if the Secretary 
determines that the project is feasible.

SEC. 5043. PEORIA RIVERFRONT DEVELOPMENT, PEORIA, ILLINOIS.

    The Secretary may carry out the project for Peoria riverfront 
development, Peoria, Illinois, under section 519 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2653-2655), at a total cost of 
$16,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $10,400,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $5,600,000.

SEC. 5044. ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN RESTORATION.

    (a) Extension of Authorization.--Section 519(c)(2) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2654) is amended by 
striking ``2004'' and inserting ``2010''.
    (b) In-Kind Services.--Section 519(g)(3) of such Act (114 Stat. 
2655) is amended by inserting before the period at the end of the first 
sentence ``if such services are provided not more than 5 years before 
the date of initiation of the project or activity''.

SEC. 5045. CALUMET REGION, INDIANA.

    Section 219(f)(12) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(113 Stat. 335) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$10,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$30,000,000''; and
            (2) by striking ``Lake and Porter'' and inserting ``Benton, 
        Jasper, Lake, Newton, and Porter''.

SEC. 5046. RATHBUN LAKE, IOWA.

    (a) Conveyance.--The Secretary shall convey the remaining water 
supply storage allocation in Rathbun Lake, Iowa, to the Rathbun 
Regional Water Association (in this section referred to as the ``Water 
Association'').
    (b) Cost Sharing.--Notwithstanding the Water Supply Act of 1958 (43 
U.S.C. 390b), the Water Association shall pay 100 percent of the cost 
of the water supply storage allocation to be conveyed under subsection 
(a). The Secretary shall credit toward such non-Federal share the cost 
of any structures and facilities constructed by the Water Association 
at the project.
    (c) Terms and Conditions.--Before conveying the water supply 
storage allocation under subsection (a), the Secretary shall enter into 
an agreement with the Water Association, under which the Water 
Association shall agree to--
            (1) in accordance with designs approved by the Chief of 
        Engineers, construct structures and facilities referred to in 
        subsection (b) that have a value equal to or greater than the 
        amount that otherwise would be paid to the Federal Government 
        for the costs of the water supply storage under the Water 
        Supply Act of 1958 (43 U.S.C. 390b);
            (2) be responsible for operating and maintaining the 
        structures and facilities;
            (3) pay all operation and maintenance costs allocated to 
        the water supply storage space;
            (4) use any revenues generated at the structures and 
        facilities that are above those required to operate and 
        maintain or improve the complex to undertake, subject to the 
        approval of the Chief of Engineers, activities that will 
        improve the quality of the environment in the Rathbun Lake 
        watershed area; and
            (5) such other terms and conditions as the Secretary 
        considers necessary to protect the interests of the United 
        States.

SEC. 5047. CUMBERLAND RIVER BASIN, KENTUCKY.

    At reservoirs managed by the Secretary within the Cumberland River 
basin, Kentucky, the Secretary shall continue to charge fees associated 
with storage and maintenance of water supply that were in effect on 
October 1, 2002.

SEC. 5048. MAYFIELD CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, KENTUCKY.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of flood damage along Mayfield 
Creek and tributaries between Wickliffe and Mayfield, Kentucky, to 
determine if the damage is the result of a Federal flood damage 
reduction project, and, if the Secretary determines that the damage is 
the result of a Federal flood damage reduction project, the Secretary 
shall carry out a project to mitigate the damage at Federal expense.

SEC. 5049. NORTH FORK, KENTUCKY RIVER, BREATHITT COUNTY, KENTUCKY.

    The Secretary shall rebuild the structure that is impeding high 
water flows on the North Fork of the Kentucky River in Breathitt 
County, Kentucky, in a manner that will reduce flood damages, at an 
estimated total cost of $1,800,000. The non-Federal interest shall 
provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and disposal 
areas required for the project. Operation and maintenance of the 
rebuilt structure shall be a non-Federal expense.

SEC. 5050. SOUTHERN AND EASTERN KENTUCKY.

    Section 531 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3774; 113 Stat. 348; 117 Stat. 142) is amended by adding the 
following:
    ``(i) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Ten percent of the amounts 
appropriated to carry out this section for fiscal years 2004 and 
thereafter may be used by the Corps of Engineers district offices to 
administer projects under this section at 100 percent Federal 
expense.''.

SEC. 5051. COASTAL LOUISIANA ECOSYSTEM PROTECTION AND RESTORATION.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section, the following definitions apply:
            (1) Coastal louisiana ecosystem.--The term ``Coastal 
        Louisiana Ecosystem'' means the coastal area of Louisiana from 
        the Sabine River on the west to the Pearl River on the east and 
        includes tidal waters, barrier islands, marshes, coastal 
        wetlands, rivers and streams, and adjacent areas.
            (2) Governor.--The term ``Governor'' means the Governor of 
        Louisiana.
            (3) Task force.--The term ``Task Force'' means the Coastal 
        Louisiana Ecosystem Protection and Restoration Task Force 
        established by subsection (e).
    (b) Comprehensive Plan.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall develop a 
        comprehensive plan for the purpose of protecting, preserving, 
        and restoring the Coastal Louisiana Ecosystem. The 
        comprehensive plan shall provide for the protection, 
        conservation and restoration of the wetlands, barrier islands, 
        shorelines, and related lands and features that protect 
        critical resources, habitat, and infrastructure from the 
        impacts of coastal storms, hurricanes, erosion, and subsidence.
            (2) Deadline.--Not later than July 1, 2004, the Secretary 
        shall transmit the plan to Congress.
            (3) Contents.--The plan shall include a comprehensive 
        report and a programmatic environmental impact statement 
        covering the proposed Federal action set forth in the plan.
            (4) Additional studies and analyses.--After transmission of 
        a report under this subsection, the Secretary may conduct 
        studies and analyses of projects related to the comprehensive 
        plan that are appropriate and consistent with this subsection.
    (c) Integration of Other Activities.--
            (1) In general.--In developing the plan under subsection 
        (b), the Secretary shall integrate ongoing Federal and State 
        projects and activities, including projects implemented under 
        the Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection and Restoration Act 
        (16 U.S.C. 3951 et seq.), the Louisiana Coastal Wetlands 
        Conservation Plan, the Louisiana Coastal Zone Management Plan, 
        and the plan of the State of Louisiana entitled ``Coast 2050: 
        Toward a Sustainable Coastal Louisiana''.
            (2) Statutory construction.--
                    (A) Existing authority.--Except as otherwise 
                expressly provided for in this section, nothing in the 
                section affects any authority in effect on the date of 
                enactment of this Act, or any requirement relating to 
                the participation in protection or restoration 
                activities in the Coastal Louisiana Ecosystem, 
                including projects and activities specified in 
                paragraph (1) of--
                            (i) the Department of the Army;
                            (ii) the Department of the Interior;
                            (iii) the Department of Commerce;
                            (iv) the Environmental Protection Agency;
                            (v) the Department of Agriculture;
                            (vi) the Department of Transportation;
                            (vii) the Department of Energy; and
                            (viii) the State of Louisiana.
                    (B) New authority.--Nothing in this section confers 
                any new regulatory authority on any Federal or non-
                Federal entity that carries out any activity authorized 
                by this section.
    (d) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of developing 
the plan under subsection (b) shall be 50 percent.
    (e) Coastal Louisiana Ecosystem Protection and Restoration Task 
Force.--
            (1) Establishment and membership.--There is established the 
        Coastal Louisiana Ecosystem Protection and Restoration Task 
        Force, which shall consist of the following members (or, in the 
        case of the head of a Federal Agency, a designee at the level 
        of Assistant Secretary or an equivalent level):
                    (A) The Secretary.
                    (B) The Secretary of the Interior.
                    (C) The Secretary of Commerce.
                    (D) The Administrator of the Environmental 
                Protection Agency.
                    (E) The Secretary of Agriculture.
                    (F) The Secretary of Transportation.
                    (G) The Secretary of Energy.
                    (H) The Coastal Advisor to the Governor.
                    (I) The Secretary of the Louisiana Department of 
                Natural Resources.
                    (J) A representative of the Governor's Advisory 
                Commission on Coastal Restoration and Conservation, 
                Louisiana.
            (2) Duties of task force.--The Task Force--
                    (A) shall consult with, and provide recommendations 
                to, the Secretary during development of the 
                comprehensive plan under subsection (b)(1);
                    (B) shall coordinate the development of consistent 
                policies, strategies, plans, programs, projects, 
                activities, and priorities for addressing the 
                protection, conservation, and restoration of the 
                Coastal Louisiana Ecosystem;
                    (C) shall exchange information regarding programs, 
                projects, and activities of the agencies and entities 
                represented on the Task Force to promote ecosystem 
                protection, restoration, and maintenance;
                    (D) shall establish a regional working group which 
                shall include representatives of the agencies and 
                entities represented on the Task Force as well as other 
                governmental entities as appropriate for the purpose of 
                formulating, recommending, coordinating, and 
                implementing policies, strategies, plans, programs, 
                projects, activities, and priorities of the Task Force;
                    (E) may allow the working group described in 
                subparagraph (D) to--
                            (i) establish such advisory bodies as are 
                        necessary to assist the Task Force in its 
                        duties; and
                            (ii) select as an advisory body any entity 
                        that represents a broad variety of private and 
                        public interests;
                    (F) shall facilitate the resolution of interagency 
                and intergovernmental conflicts associated with the 
                protection, conservation, and restoration of the 
                Coastal Louisiana Ecosystem;
                    (G) shall coordinate scientific research associated 
                with the protection and restoration of the Coastal 
                Louisiana Ecosystem;
                    (H) shall provide assistance and support to 
                agencies and entities represented on the Task Force in 
                their protection and restoration activities;
                    (I) shall prepare an integrated financial plan and 
                recommendations for coordinated budget requests for the 
                funds proposed to be expended by agencies and entities 
                represented on the Task Force for the protection, 
                conservation, and restoration of the Coastal Louisiana 
                Ecosystem; and
                    (J) shall transmit to the Committee on 
                Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
                Representatives and the Committee on Environment and 
                Public Works of the Senate a report that summarizes the 
                activities of the Task Force.
            (3) Procedures and advice.--
                    (A) Public participation.--
                            (i) In general.--The Task Force shall 
                        implement procedures to facilitate public 
                        participation in the advisory process, 
                        including providing advance notice of meetings, 
                        providing adequate opportunity for public input 
                        and comment, maintaining appropriate records, 
                        and making a record of proceedings of meetings 
                        available for public inspection.
                            (ii) Oversight.--The Secretary shall ensure 
                        that the procedures described in clause (i) are 
                        adopted and implemented and that the records 
                        described in clause (i) are accurately 
                        maintained and available for public inspection.
                    (B) Advisors to the task force and working 
                groups.--The Task Force or the working group described 
                in paragraph (2)(D) may seek such advice and input from 
                any interested, knowledgeable, or affected party as the 
                Task Force or working group determines to be necessary 
                to perform the duties described in paragraph (2).
                    (C) Application of the federal advisory committee 
                act.--The Task Force, advisors to the Task Force, and 
                any associated workgroups shall not be considered 
                advisory committees under the Federal Advisory 
                Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App).
            (4) Compensation.--A member of the Task Force shall receive 
        no additional compensation for the services provided as a 
        member of the Task Force.
            (5) Travel expenses.--Travel expenses incurred by a member 
        of the Task Force in the performance of services for the Task 
        Force shall be paid by the agency or entity that the member 
        represents.

SEC. 5052. BATON ROUGE, LOUISIANA.

    Section 219(f)(21) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(113 Stat. 336; 114 Stat. 2763A-220) is amended by striking 
``$20,000,000'' and inserting ``$35,000,000''.

SEC. 5053. WEST BATON ROUGE PARISH, LOUISIANA.

    Section 517(5) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 345) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(5) Mississippi River, West Baton Rouge Parish, 
        Louisiana, project for waterfront and riverine preservation, 
        restoration, enhancement modifications, and interpretive center 
        development.''.

SEC. 5054. CHESAPEAKE BAY SHORELINE, MARYLAND, VIRGINIA, PENNSYLVANIA, 
              AND DELAWARE.

    (a) In General.--In carrying out comprehensive study of the 
feasibility of a project to address shoreline erosion and related 
sediment management measures to protect water and land resources of the 
Chesapeake Bay, the Secretary may carry out pilot projects to 
demonstrate the feasibility of alternative measures to address sediment 
loads to the Chesapeake Bay from sediment behind dams on the lower 
Susquehanna River.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $5,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 5055. DELMARVA CONSERVATION CORRIDOR, MARYLAND.

    (a) Assistance.--The Secretary may provide technical assistance to 
the Secretary of Agriculture in carrying out the Conservation Corridor 
Demonstration Program authorized under subtitle G of title II of Public 
Law 107-171 (116 Stat. 275-278).
    (b) Coordination and Integration.--In carrying out water resources 
projects in the State of Maryland on land located on the east side of 
the Chesapeake Bay, the Secretary shall coordinate and integrate, to 
the extent practicable, such projects with any activities undertaken to 
implement a conservation corridor plan approved by the Secretary of 
Agriculture under section 2602 of Public Law 107-171 (116 Stat. 275-
276).

SEC. 5056. DETROIT RIVER, MICHIGAN.

    Section 568(c)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
(113 Stat. 368) is amended by striking ``$1,000,000'' and inserting 
``$25,000,000''.

SEC. 5057. OAKLAND COUNTY, MICHIGAN.

    Section 219(f)(29) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(113 Stat. 336) is amended by inserting ``sanitary sewer overflows 
and'' before ``combined sewer overflows''.

SEC. 5058. ST. CLAIR RIVER AND LAKE ST. CLAIR, MICHIGAN.

    The Secretary shall carry out feasible aquatic ecosystem 
restoration projects identified in the comprehensive management plan 
for St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair, Michigan, developed under 
section 426 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 
326), at a total Federal cost of not to exceed $5,000,000.

SEC. 5059. GARRISON AND KATHIO TOWNSHIP, MINNESOTA.

    (a) Project Description.--Section 219(f)(61) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (114 Stat. 2763A-221) is amended--
            (1) in the paragraph heading by striking ``township'' and 
        inserting ``and crow wing and mille lacs counties'';
            (2) by inserting ``, Crow Wing County, Mille Lacs County,'' 
        after ``Garrison''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following: ``Such assistance 
        shall be provided directly to the Garrison-Kathio-West Mille 
        Lacs Lake Sanitary District, Minnesota.''.
    (b) Procedures.--In carrying out the project for Garrison and 
Kathio Township, Minnesota, authorized by such section 219(f)(61), the 
Secretary may use the cost sharing and contracting procedures available 
to the Secretary under section 569 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 368).

SEC. 5060. NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTA.

    (a) In General.--Section 569 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1999 (113 Stat. 368) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a) by striking ``Benton, Sherburne,'' 
        and inserting ``Beltrami, Hubbard, Wadena,'';
            (2) by striking the last sentence of subsection (e)(3)(B);
            (3) by striking subsection (g) and inserting the following:
    ``(g) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project 
undertaken under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a 
nonprofit entity.''; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(i) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Ten percent of the amounts 
appropriated to carry out this section may be used by the Corps of 
Engineers district offices to administer projects under this section at 
100 percent Federal expense.''.
    (b) Biwabik, Minnesota.--The Secretary shall reimburse the non-
Federal interest for the project for environmental infrastructure, 
Biwabik, Minnesota, carried out under section 569 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 368-369), for planning, 
design, and construction costs that were incurred by the non-Federal 
interest with respect to the project before the date of the partnership 
agreement for the project and that were in excess of the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the project if the Secretary determines that the 
costs are appropriate.

SEC. 5061. DESOTO COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.

    Section 219(f)(30) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(113 Stat. 336; 114 Stat. 2763A-220) is amended by striking 
``$20,000,000'' and inserting ``$30,000,000''.

SEC. 5062. HARRISON, HANCOCK, AND JACKSON COUNTIES, MISSISSIPPI.

    In carrying out projects for the protection, restoration, and 
creation of aquatic and ecologically related habitats located in 
Harrison, Hancock, and Jackson Counties, Mississippi, under section 204 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326), the 
Secretary shall accept any portion of the non-Federal share of the cost 
of the project in the form of services, materials, supplies, and other 
in-kind contributions.

SEC. 5063. MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MISSOURI, AND ILLINOIS.

    As a part of the operation and maintenance of the project for the 
Mississippi River (Regulating Works), between the Ohio and Missouri 
Rivers, Missouri and Illinois, authorized by the first section of an 
Act entitled ``Making appropriations for the construction, repair, and 
preservation of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for 
other purposes'', approved June 25, 1910, the Secretary may carry out 
activities necessary to restore and protect fish and wildlife habitat 
in the middle Mississippi River system. Such activities may include 
modification of navigation training structures, modification and 
creation of side channels, modification and creation of islands, and 
studies and analysis necessary to apply adaptive management principles 
in design of future work.

SEC. 5064. ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI.

    Section 219(f)(32) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(106 Stat. 4835-4836; 113 Stat. 337) is amended by striking 
``$15,000,000'' and inserting ``$35,000,000''.

SEC. 5065. HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS AREA, NEW JERSEY.

    Section 324 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4849; 110 Stat. 3779) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``design'' and inserting 
                ``planning, design,''; and
                    (B) by striking ``Hackensack Meadowlands 
                Development'' and all that follows through ``Plan for'' 
                and inserting ``New Jersey Meadowlands Commission for 
                the development of an environmental improvement program 
                for'';
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) in the subsection heading by striking 
                ``Required'';
                    (B) by striking ``shall'' and inserting ``may'';
                    (C) by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the 
                following:
            ``(1) Restoration and acquisitions of significant wetlands 
        and aquatic habitat that contribute to the Meadowlands 
        ecosystem.'';
                    (D) in paragraph (2) by inserting ``and aquatic 
                habitat'' before the period at the end; and
                    (E) by striking paragraph (7) and inserting the 
                following:
            ``(7) Research, development, and implementation for a water 
        quality improvement program, including restoration of hydrology 
        and tidal flows and remediation of hot spots and other sources 
        of contaminants that degrade existing or planned sites.'';
            (3) in subsection (c) by inserting before the last sentence 
        the following: ``The non-Federal sponsor may also provide in-
        kind services, not to exceed 25 percent of the total project 
        cost, and may also receive credit for reasonable cost of design 
        work completed prior to entering into the partnership agreement 
        with the Secretary for a project to be carried out under the 
        program developed under subsection (a).''; and
            (4) in subsection (d) by striking ``$5,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$35,000,000''.

SEC. 5066. ATLANTIC COAST OF NEW YORK.

    (a) Development of Program.--Section 404(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4863) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``processes'' and inserting ``and related 
        environmental processes'';
            (2) by inserting after ``Atlantic Coast'' the following: 
        ``(and associated back bays)'';
            (3) by inserting after ``actions'' the following: ``, 
        environmental restoration or conservation measures for coastal 
        and back bays,''; and
            (4) by inserting at the end the following: ``The plan for 
        collecting data and monitoring information included in such 
        annual report shall be fully coordinated with and agreed to by 
        appropriate agencies of the State of New York.''.
    (b) Annual Reports.--Section 404(b) of such Act is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Initial Plan.--Not later than 12 months 
        after the date of the enactment of this Act, the'' and 
        inserting ``Annual Reports.--The'';
            (2) by striking ``initial plan for data collection and 
        monitoring'' and inserting ``annual report of data collection 
        and monitoring activities''; and
            (3) by striking the last sentence.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 404(c) of such Act 
(113 Stat. 341) is amended by striking ``and an additional total of 
$2,500,000 for fiscal years thereafter'' and inserting ``$2,500,000 for 
fiscal years 2000 through 2002, and $17,000,000 for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2002,''.

SEC. 5067. COLLEGE POINT, NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK.

    In carrying out section 312 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1990 (104 Stat. 4639-4640), the Secretary shall give priority to 
work in College Point, New York City, New York.

SEC. 5068. FLUSHING BAY AND CREEK, NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost 
of the project for ecosystem restoration, Flushing Bay and Creek, New 
York City, New York, the cost of design and construction work carried 
out by the non-Federal interest before the date of the partnership 
agreement for the project if the Secretary determines that the work is 
integral to the project.

SEC. 5069. LITTLE NECK BAY, VILLAGE OF KINGS POINT, NEW YORK.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may carry out a navigation project 
at Little Neck Bay (Hague Basin), Village of Kings Point, New York, 
sufficient to permit the safe operation of the vessel T/V Kings Pointer 
at all tide levels.
    (b) Reimbursement.--The Secretary shall seek reimbursement from the 
United States Merchant Marine Academy for the cost of the project 
carried out under this section.

SEC. 5070. ONONDAGA LAKE, NEW YORK.

    Section 573 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 372-373) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (f) by striking ``$10,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$30,000,000'';
            (2) by redesignating subsections (f) and (g) as subsections 
        (g) and (h), respectively; and
            (3) by inserting after subsection (e) the following:
    ``(f) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project 
carried out under this section, a non-Federal sponsor may include a 
nonprofit entity, with the consent of the affected local government.''.

SEC. 5071. JOHN H. KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, NORTH CAROLINA.

    The Secretary shall expedite the completion of the calculations 
necessary to negotiate and execute a revised, permanent contract for 
water supply storage at John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, North Carolina, 
among the Secretary and the Kerr Lake Regional Water System and the 
city of Henderson, North Carolina.

SEC. 5072. STANLY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA.

    Section 219(f)(64) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(114 Stat. 2763A-221) is amended by inserting ``water and'' before 
``wastewater''.

SEC. 5073. CENTRAL RIVERFRONT PARK, CINCINNATI, OHIO.

    If the Secretary is authorized to carry out a downtown waterfront 
development project for the Central Riverfront Park, Cincinnati, Ohio, 
the Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of 
the project the cost of--
            (1) design and construction work undertaken by the non-
        Federal interest before entering into a partnership agreement 
        for the project with the Secretary if the Secretary determines 
        that the work is integral to the project; and
            (2) land, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations 
        provided by the non-Federal interest.

SEC. 5074. PIEDMONT LAKE DAM, OHIO.

    In reconstructing the road on the Piedmont Lake Dam as part of the 
project for dam safety assurance, Piedmont Lake Dam, Ohio, being 
carried out under section 4 of the Flood Control Act of August 11, 1939 
(53 Stat. 1414-1415), the Secretary shall upgrade the condition of the 
road to meet standards applicable to public use roads in the State of 
Ohio. The incremental cost of upgrading the road to meet such standards 
shall be a non-Federal expense.

SEC. 5075. OHIO.

    Section 594(g) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 383) is amended by striking ``$60,000,000'' and inserting 
``$90,000,000''.

SEC. 5076. WAURIKA LAKE, OKLAHOMA.

    The remaining obligation of the Waurika Project Master Conservancy 
District payable to the United States Government in the amounts, rates 
of interest, and payment schedules is set at the amounts, rates of 
interest, and payment schedules that existed, and that both parties 
agreed to, on June 3, 1986, and may not be adjusted, altered, or 
changed without a specific, separate, and written agreement between the 
District and the United States Government.

SEC. 5077. COLUMBIA RIVER, OREGON.

    Section 401(b)(3) of Public Law 100-581 (102 Stat. 2944), is 
amended by inserting ``and Celilo Village, Oregon'' after ``existing 
sites''.

SEC. 5078. EUGENE, OREGON.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of restoring the millrace in Eugene, Oregon, and, if 
the Secretary determines that the restoration is feasible, shall carry 
out the restoration.
    (b) Consideration of Noneconomic Benefits.--In determining the 
feasibility of restoring the millrace, the Secretary shall include 
noneconomic benefits associated with the historical significance of the 
millrace and associated with preservation and enhancement of resources.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $20,000,000.

SEC. 5079. JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM, LAKE UMATILLA, OREGON AND WASHINGTON.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall pay up to $2,500,000 to the 
provider of research and curation support previously provided to the 
Federal Government as a result of the multipurpose project, John Day 
Lock and Dam, Lake Umatilla, Oregon and Washington, authorized by 
section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1950 (64 Stat. 167), and the 
several navigation and flood damage reduction projects constructed on 
the Columbia River and Lower Willamette River, Oregon and Washington.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $2,500,000.

SEC. 5080. LOWELL, OREGON.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may convey without consideration to 
Lowell School District, by quitclaim deed, all right, title and 
interest of the United States in and to approximately 3.32 acres of 
land and buildings thereon, known as Tract A-82, located in Lowell, 
Oregon, and described in subsection (b).
    (b) Description of Property.--The parcel of land authorized to be 
conveyed under subsection (a) is as follows: Commencing at the point of 
intersection of the west line of Pioneer Street with the westerly 
extension of the north line of Summit Street, in Meadows Addition to 
Lowell, as platted and recorded at page 56 of Volume 4, Lane County 
Oregon Plat Records; thence north on the west line of Pioneer Street a 
distance of 176.0 feet to the true point of beginning of this 
description; thence north on the west line of Pioneer Street a distance 
of 170.0 feet; thence west at right angles to the west line of Pioneer 
Street a distance of 250.0 feet; thence south and parallel to the west 
line of Pioneer Street a distance of 170.0 feet; thence east 250.0 feet 
to the true point of beginning of this description in Section 14, 
Township 19 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, Lane 
County, Oregon.
    (c) Terms and Conditions.--Before conveying the parcel to the 
school district, the Secretary shall ensure that the conditions of 
buildings and facilities meet the requirements of applicable Federal 
law.
    (d) Generally Applicable Provisions.--
            (1) Applicability of property screening provisions.--
        Section 2696 of title 10, United States Code, shall not apply 
        to any conveyance under this section.
            (2) Liability.--An entity to which a conveyance is made 
        under this section shall hold the United States harmless from 
        any liability with respect to activities carried out, on or 
        after the date of the conveyance, on the real property 
        conveyed. The United States shall remain responsible for any 
        liability with respect to activities carried out, before such 
        date, on the real property conveyed.

SEC. 5081. HAGERMAN'S RUN, WILLIAMSPORT, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary may rehabilitate the pumps at the project for flood 
damage reduction, Hagerman's Run, Williamsport, Pennsylvania, at a 
total Federal cost of $225,000.

SEC. 5082. NORTHEAST PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 219(f)(11) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(113 Stat. 335) is amended by striking ``and Monroe'' and inserting 
``Northumberland, Union, Snyder, and Montour''.

SEC. 5083. SUSQUEHANNOCK CAMPGROUND ACCESS ROAD, RAYSTOWN LAKE, 
              PENNSYLVANIA.

    (a) Improvement of Access Road.--The Secretary may make 
improvements to the Susquehannock Campground access road at Raystown 
Lake, Pennsylvania.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $500,000.

SEC. 5084. UPPER SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN, PENNSYLVANIA AND NEW YORK.

    Section 567 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3787-3788; 114 Stat. 2662-2663) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(2) by striking ``$10,000,000.'' and 
        inserting the following: ``$20,000,000, of which the Secretary 
        may utilize not more than $5,000,000 to design and construct 
        feasible pilot projects during the development of the strategy 
        to demonstrate alternative approaches for the strategy. The 
        total cost for any single pilot project may not exceed 
        $500,000. The Secretary shall evaluate the results of the pilot 
        projects and consider the results in the development of the 
        strategy.'';
            (2) in subsection (c)--
                    (A) in the subsection heading by striking 
                ``Cooperation'' and inserting ``Cooperative''; and
                    (B) by striking ``cooperation'' and inserting 
                ``cooperative''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the project (i) the cost of design and 
construction work carried out by the non-Federal interest before the 
date of the partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary 
determines that the work is integral to the project; and (ii) the cost 
of in-kind services and materials provided for the project by the non-
Federal interest.''.

SEC. 5085. WASHINGTON, GREENE, WESTMORELAND, AND FAYETTE COUNTIES, 
              PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 219(f)(70) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(114 Stat. 2763A-221) is amended by striking ``$8,000,000'' and 
inserting ``$13,300,000''.

SEC. 5086. CANO MARTIN PENA, SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO.

    The Secretary shall review a report prepared by the non-Federal 
interest concerning flood protection and environmental restoration for 
Cano Martin Pena, San Juan, Puerto Rico, and, if the Secretary 
determines that the report meets the evaluation and design standards of 
the Corps of Engineers and that the project is feasible, may carry out 
the project, at a total cost of $130,000,000, with an estimated Federal 
cost of $85,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $45,000,000.

SEC. 5087. BEAUFORT AND JASPER COUNTIES, SOUTH CAROLINA.

    The Secretary may accept from the Department of the Navy, and may 
use, not to exceed $23,000,000 to assist the Beaufort Jasper Water and 
Sewage Authority, South Carolina, with its plan to consolidate civilian 
and military wastewater treatment facilities.

SEC. 5088. COOPER RIVER, SOUTH CAROLINA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to provide technical 
and financial assistance for the removal of the Grace and Pearman 
Bridges over the Cooper River, South Carolina.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriation.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $5,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 5089. LAKES MARION AND MOULTRIE, SOUTH CAROLINA.

    Section 219(f)(25) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(113 Stat. 336; 114 Stat. 2763A-220) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$15,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$35,000,000''; and
            (2) by inserting ``wastewater treatment and'' before 
        ``water supply''.

SEC. 5090. UPPER BIG SIOUX RIVER, WATERTOWN, SOUTH DAKOTA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall review the project for flood 
damage reduction, Upper Big Sioux River basin, Watertown, South Dakota, 
as described in the report of the Chief of Engineers, dated August 31, 
1994, and entitled ``Watertown and Vicinity, South Dakota'' and, if the 
Secretary determines that the project is feasible, may carry out the 
project, at a total cost of $25,000,000.
    (b) Non-Federal Share.--
            (1) In general.--The non-Federal share of the cost of the 
        review may be provided in the form of in-kind services and 
        materials.
            (2) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-
        Federal share of the cost of the review the cost of planning 
        and design work carried out by the non-Federal interest before 
        the date of an agreement for the review if the Secretary 
        determines that such work is integral to the review.

SEC. 5091. FRITZ LANDING, TENNESSEE.

    The Secretary shall--
            (1) conduct a study of the Fritz Landing Agricultural Spur 
        Levee, Tennessee, to determine the extent of levee 
        modifications that would be required to make the levee and 
        associated drainage structures consistent with Federal 
        standards;
            (2) design and construct such modifications; and
            (3) after completion of such modifications, incorporate the 
        levee into the project for flood control, Mississippi River and 
        Tributaries, authorized by the Act entitled ``An Act for the 
        control of floods on the Mississippi River and its tributaries, 
        and for other purposes'', approved May 15, 1928 (45 Stat. 534-
        539), commonly known as the ``Flood Control Act of 1928''.

SEC. 5092. MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE.

    The Secretary shall review the aquatic ecosystem restoration 
component of the Memphis Riverfront Development Master Plan, Memphis, 
Tennessee, prepared by the non-Federal interest and, if the Secretary 
determines that the component meets the evaluation and design standards 
of the Corps of Engineers and that the component is feasible, may carry 
out the component at a total Federal cost not to exceed $5,000,000.

SEC. 5093. TOWN CREEK, LENOIR CITY, TENNESSEE.

    The Secretary shall design and construct the project for flood 
damage reduction designated as Alternative 4 in the Town Creek, Lenoir 
City, Loudon City, Tennessee, feasibility report of the Nashville 
district engineer, dated November 2000, under the authority of section 
205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), notwithstanding 
section 1 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 (33 U.S.C. 701a; 49 
Stat. 1570). The non-Federal share of the cost of the project shall be 
subject to section 103(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(a)).

SEC. 5094. TENNESSEE RIVER PARTNERSHIP.

    (a) In General.--As part of the operation and maintenance of the 
project for navigation, Tennessee River, Tennessee, Alabama, 
Mississippi, and Kentucky, authorized by the first section of the 
Rivers and Harbors Act of July 3, 1930 (46 Stat. 927), the Secretary 
may enter into a partnership with a nonprofit entity to remove debris 
from the Tennessee River in the vicinity of Knoxville, Tennessee, by 
providing a vessel to such entity, at Federal expense, for such debris 
removal purposes.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $500,000.

SEC. 5095. CLEAR CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, HARRIS, GALVESTON, AND BRAZORIA 
              COUNTIES, TEXAS.

    The Secretary shall expedite completion of the report for the 
project for flood damage reduction, ecosystem restoration, and 
recreation, Clear Creek and tributaries, Harris, Galveston, and 
Brazoria Counties, Texas.

SEC. 5096. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS.

    Section 575(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3789; 113 Stat. 311) is amended by inserting before the period at 
the end the following: ``, whether or not such works or actions are 
partially funded under the hazard mitigation grant program of the 
Federal Emergency Management Agency''.

SEC. 5097. HARRIS GULLY, HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS.

    (a) Study.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
        determine the feasibility of carrying out a project for flood 
        damage reduction in the Harris Gully watershed, Harris County, 
        Texas, to provide flood protection for the Texas Medical 
        Center, Houston, Texas.
            (2) Use of local studies and plans.--In conducting the 
        study, the Secretary shall use, to the extent practicable, 
        studies and plans developed by the non-Federal interest if the 
        Secretary determines that such studies and plans meet the 
        evaluation and design standards of the Corps of Engineers.
            (3) Completion date.--The Secretary shall complete the 
        study by July 1, 2004.
    (b) Critical Flood Damage Reduction Measures.--The Secretary may 
carry out critical flood damage reduction measures that the Secretary 
determines are feasible and that will provide immediate and substantial 
flood damage reduction benefits in the Harris Gully watershed, at a 
Federal cost of $7,000,000.
    (c) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the project the cost of planning, design, and 
construction work carried out by the non-Federal interest before the 
date of the partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary 
determines that such work is integral to the project.
    (d) Nonprofit Entity.--Notwithstanding section 221 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), a nonprofit entity may, with 
the consent of the local government, serve as a non-Federal interest 
for the project undertaken under this section.

SEC. 5098. ONION CREEK, TEXAS.

    In carrying out the study for the project for flood damage, 
reduction, recreation, and ecosystem restoration, Onion Creek, Texas, 
the Secretary shall include the costs and benefits associated with the 
relocation of flood-prone residences in the study area for the project 
during the 2-year period before the initiation of the feasibility study 
to the extent the Secretary determines such relocations are compatible 
with the project. The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the project the cost of relocation of such flood-
prone residences incurred by the non-Federal interest before the date 
of the partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary 
determines that the relocation of such residences is integral to the 
project.

SEC. 5099. PELICAN ISLAND, TEXAS.

    (a) In General.--Section 108(a) of the Energy and Water Development 
Appropriations Act, 1994 (33 U.S.C. 59hh(a)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``The Secretary'' and inserting the 
        following:
            ``(1) Authority to convey.--The Secretary'';
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Letter of intent.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Secretary may provide a 
                letter of intent to the city of Galveston for 
                conveyance of less than 100 acres of the parcel 
                described in subsection (a) for private development 
                purposes if the Secretary receives and approves a 
                proposal by the city designating the land which would 
                be subject to such development.
                    ``(B) Disposition of spoil.--If the Secretary 
                issues a letter of intent under subparagraph (A), no 
                additional spoil material may be placed on the land 
                designated for private development for a period of at 
                least 5 years from the date of issuance of the letter 
                to provide the city of Galveston with an opportunity to 
                secure private developers, perform appraisals, conduct 
                environmental studies, and provide the compensation to 
                the United States required for the conveyance.''; and
            (3) by aligning the remainder of the text of paragraph (1) 
        (as designated by paragraph (1) of this subsection) with 
        paragraph (2) (as added by paragraph (2) of this subsection).
    (b) Expiration Date.--Section 108(e)(3) of such Act (33 U.S.C. 
59hh(e)(3)) is amended by striking ``date of the enactment of this 
Act'' and inserting ``date of enactment of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2003''.

SEC. 5100. FRONT ROYAL, VIRGINIA.

    Section 591(a)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
(113 Stat. 378) is amended by striking ``$12,000,000'' and inserting 
``$22,000,000''.

SEC. 5101. RICHMOND NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD PARK, RICHMOND, VIRGINIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to carry out bluff 
stabilization measures on the James River in the vicinity of Drewry's 
Bluff, Richmond National Battlefield Park, Richmond, Virginia.
    (b) Reimbursement.--The Secretary shall seek reimbursement from the 
Secretary of the Interior of any costs incurred by the Secretary in 
carrying out subsection (a).

SEC. 5102. BAKER BAY AND ILWACO HARBOR, WASHINGTON.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of increased siltation in Baker 
Bay and Ilwaco Harbor, Washington, to determine if the siltation is the 
result of a Federal navigation project (including diverted flows from 
the Columbia River) and, if the Secretary determines that the siltation 
is the result of a Federal navigation project, the Secretary shall 
carry out a project to mitigate the siltation as part of maintenance of 
the Federal navigation project.

SEC. 5103. CHEHALIS RIVER, CENTRALIA, WASHINGTON.

    The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost 
of the project for flood damage reduction, Chehalis River, Centralia, 
Washington, the cost of planning, design, and construction work carried 
out by the non-Federal interest before the date of the partnership 
agreement for the project if the Secretary determines that the work is 
integral to the project.

SEC. 5104. HAMILTON ISLAND CAMPGROUND, WASHINGTON.

    The Secretary is authorized to plan, design, and construct a 
campground for Bonneville Lock and Dam at Hamilton Island (also know as 
``Strawberry Island'') in Skamania County, Washington.

SEC. 5105. PUGET ISLAND, WASHINGTON.

    The Secretary is directed to place dredged and other suitable 
material along portions of the Columbia River shoreline of Puget 
Island, Washington, between river miles 38 to 47 in order to protect 
economic and environmental resources in the area from further erosion, 
at a Federal cost of $1,000,000. This action shall be coordinated with 
appropriate resource agencies and comply with applicable Federal laws.

SEC. 5106. BLUESTONE, WEST VIRGINIA.

    Section 547 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2676-2678) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(1)(A) by striking ``4 years'' and 
        inserting ``5 years'';
            (2) in subsection (b)(1)(B)(iii) by striking ``if all'' and 
        all that follows through ``facility'' and inserting ``assurance 
        project'';
            (3) in subsection (b)(1)(C) by striking ``and 
        construction'' and inserting ``, construction, and operation 
        and maintenance'';
            (4) by adding at the end of subsection (b) the following:
            ``(3) Operation and ownership.--The Tri-Cities Power 
        Authority shall be the owner and operator of the hydropower 
        facilities referred to in subsection (a).'';
            (5) in subsection (c)(1)--
                    (A) by striking ``No'' and inserting ``Unless 
                otherwise provided, no'';
                    (B) by inserting ``planning,'' before ``design''; 
                and
                    (C) by striking ``prior to'' and all that follows 
                through ``subsection (d)'';
            (6) in subsection (c)(2) by striking ``design'' and 
        inserting ``planning, design,'';
            (7) in subsection (d)--
                    (A) by striking paragraphs (1) and (2) and 
                inserting the following:
            ``(1) Approval.--The Secretary shall review the design and 
        construction activities for all features of the hydroelectric 
        project that pertain to and affect stability of the dam and 
        control the release of water from Bluestone Dam to ensure that 
        the quality of construction of those features meets all 
        standards established for similar facilities constructed by the 
        Secretary.'';
                    (B) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph 
                (2);
                    (C) by striking the period at the end of paragraph 
                (2) (as so redesignated) and inserting ``, except that 
                hydroelectric power is no longer a project purpose of 
                the facility. Water flow releases from the hydropower 
                facilities shall be determined and directed by the 
                Corps of Engineers.''; and
                    (D) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Coordination.--Construction of the hydroelectric 
        generating facilities shall be coordinated with the dam safety 
        assurance project currently in the design and construction 
        phases.'';
            (8) in subsection (e) by striking ``in accordance'' and all 
        that follows through ``58 Stat. 890)'';
            (9) in subsection (f)--
                    (A) by striking ``facility of the interconnected 
                systems of reservoirs operated by the Secretary'' each 
                place it appears and inserting ``facilities under 
                construction under such agreements''; and
                    (B) by striking ``design'' and inserting 
                ``planning, design'';
            (10) in subsection (f)(2)--
                    (A) by ``Secretary'' each place it appears and 
                inserting ``Tri-Cities Power Authority''; and
                    (B) by striking ``facilities referred to in 
                subsection (a)'' and inserting ``such facilities'';
            (11) by striking paragraph (1) of subsection (g) and 
        inserting the following:
            ``(1) to arrange for the transmission of power to the 
        market or to construct such transmission facilities as 
        necessary to market the power produced at the facilities 
        referred to in subsection (a) with funds contributed by the 
        Tri-Cities Power Authority; and'';
            (12) in subsection (g)(2) by striking ``such facilities'' 
        and all that follows through ``the Secretary'' and inserting 
        ``the generating facility''; and
            (13) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(i) Tri-Cities Power Authority Defined.--In this section, the 
`Tri-Cities Power Authority' refers to the entity established by the 
City of Hinton, West Virginia, the City of White Sulphur Springs, West 
Virginia, and the City of Philippi, West Virginia, pursuant to a 
document entitled `Second Amended and Restated Intergovernmental 
Agreement' approved by the Attorney General of West Virginia on 
February 14, 2002.''.

SEC. 5107. WEST VIRGINIA AND PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD CONTROL.

    (a) Cheat and Tygart River Basins, West Virginia.--Section 
581(a)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 
3790; 113 Stat. 313) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``flood control measures'' and inserting 
        ``structural and nonstructural flood control, streambank 
        protection, stormwater management, and channel clearing and 
        modification measures''; and
            (2) by inserting ``with respect to measures that 
        incorporate levees or floodwalls'' before the semicolon.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 581(c) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3791) is amended by 
striking ``$12,000,000'' and inserting ``$90,000,000''.

SEC. 5108. LOWER KANAWHA RIVER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a watershed and river basin assessment 
under section 729 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2267a) for the Lower Kanawha River Basin, in the counties of 
Mason, Putnam, Kanawha, Jackson, and Roane, West Virginia.

SEC. 5109. CENTRAL WEST VIRGINIA.

    Section 571 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 371) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``Nicholas,''; and
                    (B) by striking ``Gilmer,''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(i) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project 
undertaken under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a 
nonprofit entity with the consent of the affected local government.
    ``(j) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Ten percent of the amounts 
appropriated to carry out this section may be used by the Corps of 
Engineers district offices to administer projects under this section at 
100 percent Federal expense.''.

SEC. 5110. SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA.

    (a) Corps of Engineers.--Section 340 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4856; 113 Stat. 320) is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(h) Corps of Engineers.--Ten percent of the amounts appropriated 
to carry out this section for fiscal years 2003 and thereafter may be 
used by the Corps of Engineers district offices to administer projects 
under this section at 100 percent Federal expense.''.
    (b) Southern West Virginia Defined.--Section 340(f) of such Act is 
amended by inserting ``Nicholas,'' after ``Greenbrier,''.
    (c) Nonprofit Entities.--Section 340 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4856) is further amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(i) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project 
undertaken under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a 
nonprofit entity with the consent of the affected local government.''.

SEC. 5111. CONSTRUCTION OF FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS BY NON-FEDERAL 
              INTERESTS.

    Section 211(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
U.S.C. 701b-13) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(9) Buffalo bayou, texas.--The project for flood control, 
        Buffalo Bayou, Texas.
            ``(10) Halls bayou, texas.--The project for flood control, 
        Halls Bayou, Texas.
            ``(11) St. Paul downtown airport (holman field), st. paul, 
        minnesota.--The project for flood damage reduction, St. Paul 
        Downtown Holman Field), St. Paul, Minnesota.''.

SEC. 5112. BRIDGE AUTHORIZATION.

    There is authorized to be appropriated $20,000,000 for the 
construction of the bridge referred to in section 1001(1).

SEC. 5113. ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR CRITICAL PROJECTS.

    Section 219(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335-337; 114 Stat. 2763A-220-221) is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
            ``(71) Plaquemine, louisiana.--$7,000,000 for sanitary 
        sewer and wastewater infrastructure, Plaquemine, Louisiana.
            ``(72) Charleston, south carolina.--$20,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, including wastewater collection 
        systems, Charleston, South Carolina.
            ``(73) Cross, south carolina.--$2,000,000 for water-related 
        environmental infrastructure, Cross, South Carolina.
            ``(74) Surfside, south carolina.--$8,000,000 for 
        environmental infrastructure, including stormwater system 
        improvements and ocean outfalls, Surfside, South Carolina.
            ``(75) North myrtle beach, south carolina.--$3,000,000 for 
        environmental infrastructure, including ocean outfalls, North 
        Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.
            ``(76) Tia juana valley, california.--$1,400,000 for water-
        related environmental infrastructure, Tia Juana Valley, 
        California.
            ``(77) Cabarrus county, north carolina.--$4,500,000 for 
        water-related infrastructure, Cabarrus County, North Carolina.
            ``(78) Richmond county, north carolina.--$8,000,000 for 
        water-related infrastructure, Richmond County, North Carolina.
            ``(79) Union county, north carolina.--$9,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, Union County, North Carolina.
            ``(80) Washington, district of columbia.--$35,000,000 for 
        implementation of a combined sewer overflow long term control 
        plan, Washington, District of Columbia.
            ``(81) Southern los angeles county, california.--
        $15,000,000 for environmental infrastructure for the 
        groundwater basin optimization pipeline, Southern Los Angeles 
        County, California.
            ``(82) Indianapolis, indiana.--$6,430,000 for environmental 
        infrastructure for Indianapolis, Indiana.
            ``(83) Henderson, nevada.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Henderson, Nevada.
            ``(84) Sennett, new york.--$1,500,000 for water 
        infrastructure, Town of Sennett, New York.
            ``(85) Ledyard and montville, connecticut.--$7,113,000 for 
        water infrastructure, Ledyard and Montville, Connecticut.
            ``(86) Awendaw, south carolina.--$2,000,000 for water-
        related infrastructure, Awendaw, South Carolina.
            ``(87) St. clair county, alabama.--$5,000,000 for water-
        related infrastructure, St. Clair County, Alabama.
            ``(88) East bay, san francisco, and santa clara areas, 
        california.--$4,000,000 for a desalination project to serve the 
        East Bay, San Francisco, and Santa Clara areas, California.
            ``(89) Athens, tennessee.--$16,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Athens, Tennessee.
            ``(90) Warwick, new york.--$1,200,000 for water storage 
        capacity restoration, Warwick, New York.
            ``(91) Kiryas joel, new york.--$20,000,000 for water-
        related infrastructure, Kiryas Joel, New York.
            ``(92) Whittier, california.--$8,000,000 for wastewater and 
        water-related infrastructure, Whittier, California.
            ``(93) Anacostia river, district of columbia and 
        maryland.--$20,000,000 for environmental infrastructure and 
        resource protection and development to enhance water quality 
        and living resources in the Anacostia River watershed, District 
        of Columbia and Maryland.
            ``(94) Duchesne, iron, and uintah counties, utah.--
        $10,000,000 for water-related infrastructure, Duchesne, Iron, 
        and Uintah Counties, Utah.
            ``(95) Hancock, harrison, jackson, and pearl river 
        counties, mississippi.--$5,824,300 for water and wastewater-
        related infrastructure, Hancock, Harrison, Jackson, and Pearl 
        River Counties, Mississippi.''.

SEC. 5114. USE OF FEDERAL HOPPER DREDGE FLEET.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study on the appropriate 
use of the Federal hopper dredge fleet.
    (b) Contents.--In conducting the study, the Secretary shall--
            (1) obtain and analyze baseline data to determine the 
        appropriate use of the Federal hopper dredge fleet;
            (2) prepare a comprehensive analysis of the costs and 
        benefits of existing and proposed restrictions on the use of 
        the Federal hopper dredge fleet; and
            (3) assess the data and procedure used by the Secretary to 
        prepare the Government cost estimate for worked performed by 
        the Federal hopper dredge fleet.
    (c) Consultation.--The Secretary shall conduct the study in 
consultation with ports, pilots, and representatives of the private 
dredge industry.
    (d) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report on the 
results of the study.

                                                 Union Calendar No. 151

108th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2557

                          [Report No. 108-265]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To provide for the conservation and development of water and related 
resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct various 
 projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of the United States, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 5, 2003

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
```