alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD CERTIFICATE June 12, 2003 Exhibit 10.56 Drew A. Morin
1008 Howard Grove View
Davidsonville, MD 21035 USA Dear Drew: Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the TeleCommunication Systems, Inc.
Amended & Restated 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (the Plan), you have been
granted a Restricted Stock Award (the Award) for the number of shares (each
an Award Share, and collectively, the Award Shares) of the Class A common
stock, par value $0.01 per share (the Common Stock) of TeleCommunication
Systems, Inc. (the Company) as outlined below. This Certificate constitutes
part of and is subject to the terms and provisions of the attached Restricted
Stock Grant Agreement (the Agreement) which is incorporated herein by
reference. Granted To: Drew A. Morin     
(the Employee)
Grant Date: April 14, 2003
Award Shares Granted: 85,000
Vesting Schedule: 3-year Vesting 28,333 on 04/14/2004
28,333 on 04/14/2005
28,334 on 04/14/2006 By my signature below, I hereby acknowledge receipt of this Award granted on
the Grant Date shown above, which has been issued to me under the terms and
conditions of the Agreement and the Plan. I understand that I will forfeit all
unvested Award Shares at the close of business on my last day of employment at
TCS. I further acknowledge receipt of the Plan Prospectus and the latest annual
report or other SEC filing, and agree to be bound by all of the terms and
conditions of the Award, as evidenced in the Agreement, and the Plan. Signature: /s/ Drew A. Morin
    
    Date: ________________Drew A. Morin
 Note: If there are any discrepancies in the name or address shown above, please
make the appropriate corrections on this form.
### [§11522. Repealed. Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title VIII, §825(b)(1), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2615]

Section, Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1247, related to a pilot program to test the feasibility of using solutions-based contracting for the acquisition of information technology. Subsequent to repeal, Pub. L. 107–347, title II, §210(h)(3)(A), Dec. 17, 2002, 116 Stat. 2938, directed that this section be renumbered section 11521 of this title.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**uBid.com
      Holdings, Inc.**





**CERIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that:





1.
 
      The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of uBid.com Holdings, Inc. for the quarter
      ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      the
      date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
 
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of uBid.com
      Holdings, Inc.


Date,
              August 14, 2007
            By:
            /s/
              Miguel A. Martinez, Jr.Miguel
              A. Martinez, Jr.Vice
              President, Finance
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-77,055

RANDALL WAYNE MAYS, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON APPEAL FROM THE DENIAL OF A MOTION

TO DETERMINE EXECUTION COMPETENCY

FROM CAUSE NO. B-156,717 IN THE 392ND DISTRICT COURT

HENDERSON COUNTY

KELLER, P.J., filed a dissenting opinion in which MEYERS, J., joined.

Mental illness and incompetence to be executed are not the same thing. Appellant has 1

produced evidence that he is mentally ill, but he has produced no evidence that he fails to understand

(1) that he is to be executed and the execution is imminent or (2) the reason he is to be executed. 

There is simply no evidence that anyone has ever asked appellant if he understands that he is to be

executed and that his execution is imminent. Nor is there any evidence that anyone has asked him

if he understands that he is being executed for the capital murder of two peace officers. I agree with

See Ferguson v. Sec'y, Fla. Dep't of Corr., 716 F.3d 1315, 1336 n.4 (11th Cir. 2013); State 1

ex rel. Cole v. Griffith, 460 S.W.3d 349, 356 (Mo. 2015).
MAYS DISSENT — 2

most of the Court's analysis regarding the proper standard of review, but I do not agree with its

application to the facts in this case. 

I respectfully dissent.

Filed: December 16, 2015

Publish
### [§323. Renumbered §355]
<PAGE>
                                                                  Page 12 of 24

                                                                  EXHIBIT 99(d)

                        KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 1999-B

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

JPMorgan Chase Bank                   Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas
One Bank One Plaza, Suite 0126        fka,  Bankers Trust Company
Chicago, IL  60670                    60 Wall Street, 26th Floor - MS NYC60-2606
Attn: Corporate Trust Administration  New York, New York 10005
Phone: (312) 407-0192                 Attn: Corporate Trust & Agency Group
Fax:     (312) 407-1708               Structured Finance
                                      Phone: (212) 250-8522
                                      Fax:   (212) 797-8606
Key Bank USA, National Association
800 Superior Ave, 4th Floor
Cleveland, OH 44114
ATTN: President, KER
Phone: (216) 828-4293
Fax:     (216) 828-9301



Pursuant to Section 4.09 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement among Key Bank USA,
National Association, as Seller, Master Servicer, and Administrator, KeyCorp
Student Loan Trust 1999-B, as Issuer, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, successor in
interest to Bank One, National Association, not in its individual capacity but
solely as Eligible Lender Trustee, dated as of September 1, 1999 (the
"Agreement"), the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) a review of the
activities of the Administrator from January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2003,
and of its performance under the Agreement has been made, and (ii) to the best
of our knowledge, based on our review, the Administrator has fulfilled all its
obligations under the Agreement and the related Administration Agreement
respectively throughout such period.

                                    Key Bank USA, National Association,
                                    as Administrator


                                    by:

                                           /S/ DARLENE H. DIMITRIJEVS
                                    ---------------------------------
Date: February 19, 2004             Name: Darlene H. Dimitrijevs, CPA
                                    Title:   Senior Vice President


                                    by:

                                           /S/ DEBRA S. FRONIUS
                                    ---------------------------------
                                    Name: Debra S. Fronius
                                    Title:   Vice President
### MAY 0 9 2016
• LX. NDEMAN
BY 

# te

F DE 

### ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR RESIGNATIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
IN THE MATTER OF RESIGNATION OF JAMES H. DAVENPORT, BAR NO. 2682. No. 70196 

# FILED

This is a joint petition by the State Bar of Nevada and attorney James H. Davenport for his resignation from the Nevada bar.

SCR 98(5) provides that Nevada attorneys who are not actively practicing law in this state may resign from the state bar if certain conditions are met. The petition includes statements from state bar staff confirming that no disciplinary, fee dispute arbitration, or client security fund matters are pending against Davenport; and that he is current on all membership fee payments and other financial commitments relating to his practice of law in this state. 

### See SCR 98(5)(a)(1)-(2).

Bar counsel has recommended that the resignation be approved, and the Board of Governors has approved the application for resignation. 

### See SCR 98(5)(a)(2). Davenport acknowledges that his resignation is irrevocable and that the state bar retains continuing jurisdiction with respect to matters involving a past member's conduct prior to resignation. 

### See SCR 98(5)(c)-(d). Finally, Davenport has submitted an affidavit of compliance with SCR 115. 

### See SCR 98(5)(e).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 

# 149 - 1(-103 (0) 19474 (401»

### )Aa Douglas

Cherr

J. The petition satisfies the requirements of SCR 98(5). Accordingly, we approve attorney James H. Davenport's resignation. SCR 98(5)(a)(2). The petition is hereby granted.

It is so ORDERED.

J. Hardesty

Saitta

cc: James H. Davenport C. Stanley Hunterton, Bar Counsel, State Bar of Nevada Kimberly K. Farmer, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada Perry Thompson, Admissions Officer, U.S. Supreme Court

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A 4ler ,
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 22 (Thursday, February 2, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5291-5292]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-2348]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7784]

The Designation of Yassin Chouka, Also Known as Yasin Chouka, 
Also Known as Abu Ibrahim, Also Known as Abu Ibraheem the German, also 
Known as Abu Ibrahim al Almani, as a Specially Designated Global 
Terrorist pursuant to Section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224, as Amended

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive 
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 
2003, I hereby determine that the individual known as Yassin Chouka, 
also known as Yasin Chouka, also known as Abu Ibrahim, also known as 
Abu Ibraheem the German, also known as Abu Ibrahim al Almani, 
committed, or poses a significant risk of committing, acts of terrorism 
that threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national security, 
foreign policy, or economy of the United States.
    Consistent with the determination in Section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because

[[Page 5292]]

to do so would render ineffectual the measures authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: January 20, 2012.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-2348 Filed 2-1-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
**EXHIBIT 31.1****SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, Joseph B. Feil, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of MetLife Policyholder Trust, for whichWilmington Trust Company acts as Trustee;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, distributableincome and changes in trust corpus of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;     4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), or for causing such procedures to beestablished and maintained, for the registrant and I have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and     5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors:     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves persons who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     In giving the certifications in paragraphs 4 and 5 above, I have relied to the extent Iconsider reasonable on information provided to me by MetLife, Inc. and Mellon Investor ServicesLLC.         By:  /s/  Joseph B. Feil   Joseph B. Feil    Assistant Vice PresidentWilmington Trust Company   Date: March 30, 2007
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Worldwide Manufacturing USA, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 (the "Report"), I, John Ballard, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/s/John BallardJohn Ballard, Chief Financial Officer

April 13, 2007
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Cancer  Detection  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  February 28, 2009,  as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
David Kittrell,  Principal  Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: April 16, 2009

By:     /s/ David Kittrell
        ------------------------------
        David Kittrell
        Principal Executive Officer and
        Principal Financial Officer
.·-, .··· 

Resolution 14·04 

Community of Elfin Cove 

Endc~rnt:"r•t o:l' Alaska Sea pla:r..es' r~r:fti~l Air Se-rf"'!? Proposal for Ano'!l',!ff F(':~.rr·'r'ear Term •::<1 -3 DHC-2 

Beaii!U/C!!'.tSna 20G ~nof. C~ii"l<l 208 Ca·rava n Pl.;;.tform. 

WH:Ei!i:EAS, The Cc<rwr.wni~·f of Elfin (:q;<e-, Ala:sJ,;a IS remotely ~ZI.~ta\!Jed on Chk:!laE;of Island, withou: m~t.: 

•:Jt ferry ;!1(;!;~515 to the ~T<a in Ia nd; .ami 

WHE!iliEAS,. Elfin O;;·~t> f.3~ls wooer tlle 1978 ,t.,ir!:ir~ ~c-r:gui<ltior; Act Essent'-al Air Servi~e (EASJ p~ram: 

arr~ 

WH:.Eili:t:A$, :Schedul!!!d air !d!r.•i~;;JI' p~.:;ovides il critics llf11lk ttl• ~m~;fE~q' ~erlke,;., rtl?!!<l1t.l! i:n~, equi;;mcnt 

and ~JJ:t:Plies:, freight and us rn~~~ "~~"~:l'c~. a n,j buslne£3 and to uri~ tr""Vl!.ll; a oo 

WliolERIEAS.,. ~!fin (..;:;· .. "' is sr:rved b·1• our s.c1~d':l!".ld air Si! !'Vice pro~ef Kalir1ia~ A·.-i;Jtion r.:li::Ja "A.Ia~'t~ 

s~aplar)~"" with ;z minimwT:five guarar.t"l,ed rE!!und;rips pcr·.....-eeldr: the sumnl<!ttiml'" pr.~": Si!ason, and 

~t le;;sttwo jj;L!.a:a.,~M tound:rips Dl!'''l'leek rn the oft-pl!'a:k ~t::a~on_, w-eiiltfler ~2rmlttio"l~; and 

WrU:I!t~ASJ Alas~a Sea.pla n-::s l'i~ ~ h;ll fleet cf s:tra !J.ll'lc aM :a~nphibi\:)u~ flo;;t p!;;.ne:s .and r.as ~pa.l;iy 

S<!l"\'~ our <:;:Qml:TIUnrty for i7 l{il'<lts 11o1i£1i Ob~p!]?rfett ~f-E!!( !!!'COrd; a,~d 

WHERfA:S. A!a~k;~ S>::!;apl:anes prop.c:ses tE!! cnntin~.JI!' se:rvica to Elfin Cft::Jve urn:li!!r :a new fou-"-'~ea r cor'r!/ao::::t 

uljiizinij: its extsti;n~ D:HC·2 ~;;IV'('ri'Cessr.a 206 !teet e11 st~ight f!o;;rts in the- &umme~:'ml:l<~nt:l ;;ornph.ibkHJS 

fl~;~~u in tr~O\t1lrrter wh!!!n ~.he l::~tbl!;;t~.J j)Cild is frozen; and 

WHIEREAS, Al;~$s-.a ~apl;mes pro;:~s upgr;;n;!ing its ;=Jeet 'A•lth the .ari!ldi!.'itm of;;n lfP.-c;;pah~ cessna. LOB 

caravan a<ircrai't on ~ rn;;-h ibious flcats ci!e;ri71g gre.ate r ca-~-aclt'{, a end imprc ... ~ r~li;;obiii't:'f du;lng pDor 

•,·i:;.:b!lit,· condltlon~ at Elie l::J4NU ;;:irport when VFi1l.opeT~tions an:~ otlierw·,:;e grc?U.~de~;L 

*P;;/i- Oate '
NACHi 


NACHI TECHNOLOGY INC. 713Pushville Road Greenwood, IN 46143 317.535.5000 Fax: 317.535.8484 

March 17,2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

UnitedStates Department ofTransportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

On behalf of Nachi Technology, Inc and Nachi America, I am writing to express 

our strong support for the application of Delta Air Lines for new nonstop service between 

Detroit and Haneda Airport in Toyko, Japan. 

Approval ofDelta's new service would be a major benefit for our region, 

:w~e.remanycc()rpotations have strong trade and market presence with Japan. There 

fife 'almost'2S0 Jipan'esc companies located in Indiana and hundreds more whose 

1)usinessa.~tiyiti~s rely on access to Japan and its market. The growth of our business 

ties with Japan had created demand for increased capacity to Tokyo. Indiana 

corporate representatives look to the convenience of flying into Tokyo's downtown 

I-Ianeda airport. 

Indianapolis does not offer international service to Asia, and many of our 

business travelers use Detroit as their hub when flying to Japan. Detroit is a proven 

and successful gateway to Asia and is an airport that can support trans-pacific routes. 

This summer Delta is adding new service to Seoul and Hong Kong, fulfilling the 

Commitment Delta made to DTW to make it the airline's gateway to Asia. The 

/\ddition ofHancda as a destination is anatumlfitthat would dearly belletlt'out 

region. 

Thank you for consideration ofthis request. 

Slnc~ly, ",. ~ 

~,M"", ,. 

Daniel:E.Nebesfo .... 

Vice President-Operations .. 

Sales and Marketing. .. 

®
 ISOlTS 16949: 2009 


ISO 14001 : 2004 
 10001.41&
Summary of interagency working comments on draft rule under EO 12866.   

These comments do not necessarily represent the views of OMB and are subject to further policy review. 

Suggested edits: 

1) Page 11 Line 16: “EPA did not stay the effectiveness of the PSD Interpretive Memo 

pending reconsideration, but she did reiterate that the Memo “does not bind States issuing 

[PSD] permits under their own State Implementation Plans.” We suggest replacing “she” 

with “EPA” as the sentence begins with referring to the Agency rather than the 

Administrator. 

2) Page 12 last line continued on page 13: “We” should be replaced with “EPA” throughout 

this section. 

3) Page 29 Language suggestion - Second full sentence on the page: “However, in the 

absence of guidance on control strategies from EPA and other regulatory agencies, the 

BACT process may be [instead of is] more time and resource intensive when applied to 

 a new pollutant. 

4) Would it be appropriate to call this package a final interpretive rule, rather than a notice 

of interpretation? 

5) Suggested edit on Page 94-97: EPA might consider cutting back this text, which 

essentially boils down to two points: the Act makes the PSD program automatically 

applicable once "EPA has determined to regulate a pollutant and such regulation is 

operative on the regulated activity," and the Act does not admit of any flexibility in these 

requirements except to the extent that will be addressed in the PSD Tailoring Rule. The 

text beginning with the paragraph at the bottom of page 96 to the paragraph at the bottom 

of page 97 is repetitive and could be omitted. 

6) Suggested edit to page 100-106: In the portion of the draft rule discussing the 

“Transition for Pending Permit Applications,” it might be advisable to add some more 

explicit discussion initially of what comments were received on this issue, and that this 

section of the draft is intended to be a response to those comments because this issue was 

not expressly raised in the proposal. 

7) Page 1/Final Line: The following word in capital letters is missing: “Thus, this notice 

explains THAT EPA . . . .” 

8) Page 11/Second Line from the Bottom: There should be a period after the parenthetical 

date. 

9) Page 49/Fifth Line from the Bottom: The word “asserts” should be “assert.” 

10) Page 90/Line 12 and Final Sentence: The date of “January 2, 2012” should be “January 

2, 2011.” There is also no period for the concluding sentence at the bottom of the page.
Issue Date: 09/09/13 1 13-020 

 NRC INSPECTION MANUAL DIRS 

Change Notice 13-020

 DELETED: TRANSMITTED: 

 Number Date Number Date

1. IMC 0612 App G 09/09/13 

2. IP 42454 07/29/08 IP 42454 09/09/13 

3. 

TRAINING: No. 

REMARKS: IMC 0612 App G, “Emergency Planning Cornerstone-Specific Supplemental 

Guidance for Appendix B Screening Figures 1 and 2,” is an initial issuance. 

Reviewed commitments for the last four years and found none. 

IP 42454, “Emergency Operating Procedures,“ has been revised based on 

periodic review and update. The title was changed to more accurately reflect the 

procedures being inspected. Added program applicability, removed one 

reference, and made formatting changes. Researched commitments for the last 

four years and found none. 

DISTRIBUTION: Standard: 

END