alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company.  The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated.  The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors.  Comments must be received not later than December 7, 2004.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta**                     (Sue Costello, Vice President) 1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30303:                

*1. The Cecil and Olivia Batchelor Family Limited Partnership*, J. Gregory Batchelor general partner; and The Olivia and Cecil Batchelor Family Limited Partnership, Rebecca Batchelor Reeves general partner; along with Cecil Batchelor, Oliva Batchelor, J. Gregory Batchelor, Rebecca Batchelor Reeves, Ray Bradley Reeves, Donna Batchelor, and Dependable True Value, Inc., all of Russellville, Alabama; to collectively acquire voting shares of CBS Banc-Corp, Russellville, Alabama, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Citizens Bank & Savings Company, Russellville, Alabama, and Bank of Bolivar, Bolivar, Tennessee.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 17, 2004.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 04-25896 Filed 11-22-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 15-916

________________________________________________________________________

ATOMIC ENERGY

Nuclear Safety

Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

and POLAND

Extending the Arrangement

of September 22, 2010

Signed at Vienna September 16, 2015
 

NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent

evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof

or authentication thereof.”
 

 POLAND

 Atomic Energy: Nuclear Safety

 Agreement extending the arrangement of 

 September 22, 2010.

 Signed at Vienna September 16, 2015;

 Entered into force September 16, 2015.

 
AGREEMENT EXTENDING THE ARRANGEMENT 

BETWEEN 

THE UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULA TORY 

COMMISSION 

AND 

THE PRESIDENT OF THE NATIONAL ATOMIC 

ENERGY AGENCY OF 

THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND 

FOR THE 

EXCHANGE OF TECHNICAL INFORMATION 

AND 

COOPERATION IN NUCLEAR SAFETY MATTERS 

SEPTEMBER 16, 2015 
AGREEMENT EXTENDING THE ARRANGEMENT 

BETWEEN 

THE UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

AND 

THE PRESIDENT OF THE NATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY 

OF THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND 

FOR THE 

EXCHANGE OF TECHNICAL INFORMATION 

AND 

COOPERATION IN NUCLEAR SAFETY MATTERS 

The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) and the President of the 

National Atomic Energy Agency of the Republic of Poland (President of the PAA), and 

hereinafter "the Parties;" 

Recalling the Arrangement Between the Nuclear Regulatory Commission of the United 

States of America and the President of the National Atomic Energy Agency of the 

Republic of Poland for the Exchange of Technical Information and Cooperation in 

Nuclear Safety Matters, signed at Vienna, Austria, on September 22, 201 0 (the 

Arrangement), which by its terms will expire on September 22, 2015; and 

Guided by their desire to continue cooperation under the Arrangement as envisaged by 

Article 19 of the Arrangement; 
2 

Hereby agree as follows: 

1. The duration of the Arrangement shall be extended for one year. The 

Arrangement shall therefore remain in force until September 22, 2016. 

2. This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature of the Parties. 

Signed at Vienna, Austria, on this 161

h day of September, 2015, in the English language. 

FOR THE UNITED STATES 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION.--

/' 

/§t~· / / ' 

FOR THE PRESIDENT OF THE 

ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY OF 

THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND 

Janusz u~ Wlodarski, President 

j
UPTI – GPI Coordinati

Jim Riley, NEI

October 20, 2011
Background

 The Ground Water Protection Initiative (GP

Underground Piping and Tanks Integrity In(UPTI) have similar goals and overlapping activities

 NSIAC questioned if the two Initiatives sho

combined

– NO Scopes, actions, and respon

are different

– BUT Initiatives overlap and would 

from coordination

 NEI committed to facilitate the coordinatio

– Initiatives referred to as the “Enhanced Ins

and Environmental Monitoring Initiatives”
Coordination Efforts

 Two deliverables:

– Enhanced Inspection and Environment

Monitoring Initiatives Coordination Workshop

– Coordination guidance

• Draft issued to workshop participants• Final to incorporate good practices from 

Workshop
Coordination Workshop

 Held September 7 and 8, 2011 in Den Covered

– Overview of NEI and EPRI guidelines– GPI and UPTI responsibilities GPI and UPTI responsibilities– Overview of coordination document– Plant examples of coordination efforts– Comparison of risk ranking methodolog

 Deliverable: coordination guidance
Coordination Guidance Conte

 Good practices related to coordinating 

Underground Piping and Tanks IntegritGround Water Protection Initiatives

 Covers

– Description of both Initiatives– Comparison of Initiative elements– Description of interface– Recommendations for efficient impleme
Coordination Guidance Statu

 Second draft of document completed  Draft being reviewed by coordination te Final draft will be sent to the workshop 

attendees and BPITF for comment

 Goal: complete by the end of 2011
#### In the Matter of Ignacio Reynoso, Appellant, v Michael McGinnis, as Superintendent of Southport Correctional Facility, Respondent.

[821 NYS2d 476]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Tait, J.), entered December 28, 2005 in Chemung County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition as untimely.

In August 2005, petitioner commenced a proceeding for a writ of habeas corpus challenging a determination of the Time Allowance Committee establishing his conditional release date, which was administratively affirmed on August 8, 2001. After Supreme Court converted it to a CPLR article 78 proceeding, respondent moved to dismiss the proceeding as untimely. Supreme Court granted the motion and this appeal ensued.

Pursuant to CPLR 217 (1), petitioner had four months from the date the administrative determination became final and binding on August 8, 2001 to commence a proceeding challenging it *(see Matter of Acero v Sabourin,*5 AD3d 821, 822 [2004]; *see also People ex rel. Miranda v Kuhlmann,*127 AD2d 924, 925 [1987], *lv denied*69 NY2d 612 [1987]). As he did not do so until August 2005, Supreme Court properly dismissed it as untimely. *1148Petitioner’s request for reconsideration did not operate to extend the statute of limitations *(see Matter of Ruffin v Joy,*298 AD2d 724, 724 [2002]).

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Mugglin, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

I, Lorne Kalisky, Principal Executive Officerof Vican Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form10-Q of the Company;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisannual report; and

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the period presented in this annual report.

 

Date: November 21, 2011

 

/s/ Lorne Kalisky	

Lorne Kalisky
CERTIFICATION OF
                          CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                            CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB of Segway V
Corp. for the year ending December 31, 2002, I, Rick Plotnikoff, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Segway V Corp. hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   Such Year End Report of Form 10-KSB for the year ending December
          31, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for
          the year ended December 31, 2002 fairly represents in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
          Segway V Corp.

Dated:    December 4, 2003

SEGWAY V CORP.


By:  /s/ Rick Plotnikoff
-----------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T22:11:55-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
ADVANCED NOTIFICATION OF 

SHIPMENT OF CATEGORY 1 AND/OR 2 

RADIOACTIVE SOURCES 

In accordance with 10 CFR Part 110.50(c)(3)(i) 

of the U.S. NRC Regulations

NRC Form 831 (04-10-2024)

SEND COMPLETED FORM TO:

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 

ATTN: Headquarters Operation Center 

Email: hoo.hoc@nrc.gov (Preferred Reporting Method) 

Fax: (301) 816-5151 (Alternative Reporting Method)

A

Part 110 license number:

B

Name of the individual and licensee making the 

notification: (address, city, state, zip code and 

telephone number)

U. S. exporting facility: 

(company name, address, city, state, zip 

code and telephone number)

C Foreign recipient name, address and end use 

location(s) if different than recipient's address:

D

Radionuclide(s) and activity level in TBq, both 

for single and aggregate shipments:

Total Activity Level (TBq):

E Make, model and serial number, for any 

category 1 and 2 sealed sources, if available:

F End-use in the importing country, if known:

G Shipment date: (MM/DD/YYYY)

H

REPORT OF EXPORT

NRC FORM 831

(04-10-2024)

10 CFR 110.50(c)(3)(i)

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY OMB: NO. 3150-0036 EXPIRES: 04/30/2027 

This notification should be accompanied by a copy of the foreign recipient's authorization or confirmation 

of that authorization from the government of the importing country, as required by 110.32(g).

Reference Number:

Comments:

Expiration date:

Estimated burden per response to comply with this mandatory collection request: 30 minutes. This form 

allows the NRC to request additional information from licensees to determine whether a license should be 

revoked, suspended, or modified. Send comments regarding burden estimate to the FOIA, Library, and 

Information Collections Branch, (T-6 A10M), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 

20555-001, or by email to Infocollects.Resource@nrc.gov, and to the and the OMB reviewer at: OMB 

Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, (3150-0036), Attn: Desk Officer for the Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission, 725 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20503. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a 

person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the document requesting or requiring 

the collection displays a currently valid OMB control number.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 218 (Friday, November 12, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 65426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25202]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-6657-6]


Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of 
EPA Comments

    Availability of EPA comments prepared pursuant to the Environmental 
Review Process (ERP), under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act and 
Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act, as amended. 
Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of 
Federal Activities at (202) 564-7167.
    An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental 
impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated April 02, 2004 (69 
FR 17403).

Draft EISs

    ERP No. D-AFS-G65094-NM Rating LO, Ojo Caliente Proposed 
Transmission Line, Authorization for Construction, Operation, and 
Maintenance of a New 115kV Transmission Line and Substation, Carson 
National Forest and BLM Taos Field Office, Taos and Rio Arriba 
Counties, NM.
    Summary: EPA has no objection to the selection of the preferred 
Alternative D with options. ERP No. D-AFS-J65424-MT Rating EC2, 
Fishtrap Project, Proposed Timber Harvest, Prescribed Burning Road 
Construction and Other Restoration Activities, Lolo National Forest, 
Plains/Thompson Falls Ranger District, Sanders County, MT.
    Summary: EPA supports Alternative 2 and it's potential to improve 
water quality, reduce road density and decrease habitat fragmentation 
in the long-term. However, EPA expressed concerns about the short-term 
impacts of increased sedimentation on water quality and bull trout. EPA 
recommend earlier implementation of road BMP improvements and road 
restoration relative to timber harvest and road construction, and 
additional road closure and decommissioning in the Upper Fishtrap 
drainage.
    ERP No. D-DHS-D11036-MD Rating EC2, National Biodefense Analysis 
and Countermeasures Center (NBACC) Facility at Fort Detrick, 
Construction and Operation, Fort Detrick, Frederick County, MD.
    Summary: EPA is concerned with the fracture trace located directly 
on the proposed project site and the potential impacts to groundwater.

Final EISs

    ERP No. F-AFS-K65263-CA Meteor Project, Proposal for Harvesting 
Timber and Conducting Associated Activities on 744 Acres, 
Implementation, Klamath National Forest, Salmon River Ranger District, 
Siskiyou County, CA.
    Summary: The Final EIS addressed EPA's concerns and no formal 
comments were sent to the preparing agency.

    Dated: November 8, 2004.
Robert W. Hargrove,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 04-25202 Filed 11-10-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
### SUBCHAPTER II—INVESTMENT IN AFFORDABLE HOUSING
### SUBCHAPTER II—FAMILY SUPPORT
(August 16, 2006)

#### In the Matter of Ken Diamondstone, Respondent, v Martin E. Connor, Jr., et al., Appellants, et al., Respondent. *483(Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Mark Stein et al., Appellants, v Ken Diamondstone, Respondent, et al., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 2.)

[819 NYS2d 486]

In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, inter alia, to validate a petitions designating Ken Diamondstone as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 12, 2006, for the nominations of the Democratic Party and the Working Families Party, respectively, as the candidate for the public office of State Senator for the 25th Senatorial District, and a related proceeding, inter alia, to invalidate the same designating petitions on the ground that the candidate does not meet the statutory residency requirements, which proceedings were jointly tried, Martin E. Connor, Jr., Mark Stein, Naftali Ausch, and Martin Connor appeal from a final order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Harkavy, J.), dated August 11, 2006, which granted the petition to validate, denied the petition to invalidate, and directed the Board of Elections of the City of New York to place the name of Ken Diamondstone on the appropriate ballot.

Ordered that the final order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the candidate was a resident of the 25th Senatorial District for the 12 months immediately preceding the election. The question of residence is a factual one, based on a variety of factors and circumstances (see *Matter of Fernandez v Monegro,*10 AD 3d 429 [2004]; *Matter of Markowitz v Gumbs,*122 AD2d 906 [1986]). The trial court, which had the advantage of viewing the witnesses and listening to their testimony, was in the best position to assess credibility and reconcile conflicting testimony (see *Barnet v Cannizzaro,*3 AD2d 745, 747 [1957]). The Supreme Court’s determination that the candidate resided at the address listed as his residence on his designating petitions should not be disturbed *(cf. Matter of Fernandez v Monegro, supra; Matter of Camardi v Sinawski,*297 AD2d 357, 358 [2002]).

In light of our determination, we need not reach the remaining contentions. Miller, J.P, Ritter, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ., concur.
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE00415A3

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
Exhibit
32.1






STELLAR
RESOURCES LTD.


OFFICER’S
CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Stellar Resources Ltd. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending January
31, 2009as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Luigi Rispoli, President, and Chief Executive Officer
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:




(1)    
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)    
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.






Dated  March
18, 2009




/s/
Luigi
Rispoli


Luigi
Rispoli


President
and Chief Executive Officer
### §323. Consumer Information Center Fund 1

(a) Existence.—There is in the Treasury a Federal Citizen Services Fund, General Services Administration, for the purpose of disseminating Federal Government information to the public and for other related purposes.

(b) Deposits.—Money shall be deposited into the Fund from—

(1) appropriations from the Treasury for Federal Citizen Services activities;

(2) user fees from the public;

(3) reimbursements from other federal agencies for costs of distributing publications; and

(4) any other income incident to Center 2 activities.

(c) Expenditures.—Money deposited into the Fund is available for expenditure for Center 2 activities in amounts specified in appropriation laws. The Fund shall assume all liabilities, obligations, and commitments of the Center 2 account.

(d) Unobligated Balances.—Any unobligated balances at the end of a fiscal year remain in the Fund and are available for authorization in appropriation laws for subsequent fiscal years.

(e) Gift Account.—The Center 2 may accept and deposit to this account gifts for purposes of defraying the costs of printing, publishing, and distributing consumer information and educational materials and undertaking other consumer information activities. In addition to amounts appropriated or otherwise made available, the Center 2 may expend the gifts for these purposes and any balance remains available for expenditure.

(f) The Administrator may enter into agreements with federal agencies to provide services through the Fund on a fully reimbursable basis.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1077; Pub. L. 111–8, div. D, title V, §516, Mar. 11, 2009, 123 Stat. 664; Pub. L. 117–103, div. E, title V, §527, Mar. 15, 2022, 136 Stat. 276.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 323(a)–(d) | 40:761. | Pub. L. 98–63, title I, §101 (1st–9th sentences in par. under heading "Consumer Information Center Fund"), July 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 321. |
| 323(e) | 40:761a. | Pub. L. 105–65, title III, (last proviso in par. under heading "Consumer Information Center Fund"), Oct. 27, 1997, 111 Stat. 1377. |

Section

In this section, the text of 40:761 (6th–last sentences) is omitted as obsolete.

In subsection (a), the words "Notwithstanding any other provision of law" are omitted as unnecessary.

In subsection (b), the words "for fiscal year 1983 and subsequent fiscal years" are omitted as obsolete and unnecessary.

In subsection (e), the words "Notwithstanding any other provision of law" and "during fiscal year 1998 and hereafter" are omitted as unnecessary.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 117–103 added subsec. (f).

2009—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 111–8 substituted "Federal Citizen Services" for "Consumer Information Center" and struck out "consumer" after "Federal Government".

Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 111–8 substituted "Federal Citizen Services" for "Consumer Information Center".

1 So in original. Probably should be "Federal Citizen Services Fund".

2 So in original. See 2009 Amendment notes below.
### **CHAPTER 25—FEDERAL FLOOD INSURANCE**

Sec.
2401 to 2413. Repealed.
2414.
Issuance of notes by Administrator of Federal Emergency Management Agency; terms and conditions.
2415 to 2421. Repealed.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00220-CR

Christopher Patrick Farr

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From Criminal District Court No. 2

of Tarrant County (1433221D)

March 23, 2017

Opinion by Justice Meier

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Bill Meier 

 Justice Bill Meier