alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION



 Exhibit 10.5 
 ICAGEN, INC. 
 Summary of Director Compensation 
 Compensation of our Directors 
 Icagen, Inc.
reimburses each non-employee director for out-of-pocket expenses they incur in attending Board and committee meetings and pays each non-employee director an annual retainer fee of $25,000. The Chairman of the Company’s Audit Committee receives
an additional annual retainer of $10,000 and other committee chairmen receive an additional annual retainer of $3,000. In addition, the Company pays each non-employee director $1,000 for attendance at each Board meeting in which he or she
participates in person or $500 if attendance is by telephone. Each non-employee director also receives $1,000 for each meeting of a committee of the Board in which he or she participates in person or $500 if attendance is by telephone that is held
on a day other than the day of the date of any meeting of the full Board of Directors. Directors who are also the Company’s employees do not receive any compensation in their capacities as directors. 
 Upon the commencement of service on the Board by any non-employee director, the Company grants to such person a non-statutory stock option to purchase
the number of shares of the Company’s common stock equal to the product of (i) 10,000 shares of the Company’s common stock divided by 12 and (ii) the number of full calendar months between the date of commencement of service and
the month in which the Company’s next annual meeting of stockholders is scheduled to occur. Each of the Company’s non-employee directors is also automatically granted a non-statutory stock option to purchase 10,000 shares of the
Company’s common stock every year on the first business day after the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders. In addition, the Company’s Chairman of the Board of Directors receives a non-statutory stock option to purchase 20,000
additional shares of the Company’s common stock every year on the first business day after the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Options granted to the Company’s non-employee directors are fully vested on the date of grant and
have exercise prices equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. 
 In order to transition the
Company’s policy of automatically granting options to non-employee directors every year on the first business day of the calendar year to every year on the first business day after the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders, on
January 2, 2008, each of the Company’s non-employee directors will receive a non-statutory stock option to purchase 5,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company’s Chairman of the Board of Directors will also receive a
non-statutory stock option to purchase 10,000 additional shares of the Company’s common stock. These options will be fully vested on the date of grant and will have exercise prices equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock
on the date of grant.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL


FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT BY


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with this Quarterly
Report of Bekem Metals, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Yermek Kudabayev, Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.











Date:
      May 7, 2010
            By:
            /s/
      Yermek KudabayevYermek
      KudabayevInterim
      Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Francis E. Burns, Respondent, against John A. Lyons, as Commissioner of the Department of Correction of the State of New York, Appellant.

Memorandum: The State Civil Service Commission, at the request of appellant, certified the names of three guards for promotion to the position of sergeant in their graded order, namely: (1) Wilkins, (2) Burns (petitioner-respondent) and (3) Johnson. All had passed competitive civil service examinations for the position and had *1054claimed and received a preference as disabled war veterans (Civil Service Law, § 21; Rules for Classified Civil Service, rule XI, subd. 1). We think that subdivision 2 of rule VIII, applied, and gave to appellant the right to select any one of these three disabled veterans and that the appointment of Johnson was valid. All concur. (The order directs defendant to appoint petitioner to the rank of sergeant in the Department of Correction.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ.
### subpart 12—national institute of environmental health sciences
OFFICE 0F:THE **AmORNEY** GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

0-O.wuccC --

p-t-t. ’

reoeire4Hon. A. M. 'Jhrnndy, page z

## 474Bon. A. M. Turney,,page 5

The Con8tltutlon protide. that the duration of 011 offlaes not fix.4 thereby &all never exceed two yeare. But it also erprassly fixes the term of oertaln speoifled ofilcee at from tw to mix pSar8, and It autlwrfzes the Leglslatur. to fir the tbrma of oertaln 

### other oifloers and members of out&in boards at not exaee4i~ elx years. The first of these oormtitutlonal provisions (Art. 16, sec. 30) fixes the terms of all offloers at two ye&r@ where they are not otherwlae fixed by the oonstitutlon or by a statute or mun1a1pal or4lMnoer

Thero’h 90 statute requiring 4oputloa to take the 

### oathof offloe laoh Jenuuy,

the only requirement being that muoh otfloer, whether l leoted 

### or appointed, Shall, berofe enter* P enbsorlbe~tho oatr P tho-dut;.s~of his ,offi.e, take and **pro6ulbed by**  law. In Mswu 

### to yourfilwu Question youare respeotfully adtl8.4 

### that It Is 

### the~oplaiomo? t&ii3department that 

### whena Ueputy 

### mherlff irra~lnted.adl takes 

### em4subscribes to 

### the oath prssclrib.4:by~l.a~ before entering upon the dUt1.s Of hi. ofi he 18 not required 

### t&take the oath of 

### off180 '%it& Jiumuy but the Sirat 

### o&h ~takenis suffieht6 4url8g Tqloe norhisTpriEoipu; -:mJ-, rucrh **40$&f m?uXd**  **,be iequir@$**  **to take**  **‘ rtnb**  SUblWziBe~the oath of of$fw 

### pzom6rlkd**’ by**  law when reappoint84 .hy 

### ~klCphSmolpel wkem ~~'iQOi~ta.t~l~~or'~~~~~~;8ander a new prin.lpui



### Yom ~800& quostian has been an-d by this dopartneot Ill inion UO. 

### O-91 

### rhioh holds that 

### in OOlUltie8 h&ring 

### a 3



### po lrtiaioi b8i ~han~tOBthwaaB4 lnlmb1tant.e tk4~okultf 

### ~ad~m8088ar and

### eallbotorof 

### taxes is 

### entitled, un4.r Arti. 

### SBOZ to o&y one ahlo?deputyat a salary of 

### $laQo.oc pu 8makr

we ~3bliukue~~a~y or op%nson m. O-91 for formatlenr ~4. ooimonIamb,

vatmumg 

### that :fho?wsga4g tally enswere 

### lnqulry,we rcmalu your lnl-m

BY
#### In the Matter of The Container Co., Respondent. Edward Corsi, as Industrial Commissioner, Appellant.

-The Industrial Commissioner has appealed from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which reversed a decision of an Unemployment Insurance Referee sustaining the determination of the commissioner denying respondent’s claim for a refund of moneys in the nature of interest and penalties which had been made pursuant to section 572 of the Unemployment Insurance Law (Labor Law, art. 18). The facts in this case are stipulated. The only issue involved is whether or not respondent is entitled to a refund.- It appears that respondent became subject to the New York Unemployment Insurance Law on June 29, 1942. It did not notify the Division of Placement and Unemployment Insurance of that fact until June 22, 1945. On August 29, 1945, the commissioner determined that respondent was subject to the penalties under section 572 of the statute. Respondent then filed payroll reports with respect to its employees covered by our law. On September 7, 1945, it remitted to the division $2,896.64 covering all contributions to June 30, 1945. It then requested a waiver of interest and penalties because it had reported the same payrolls and paid contributions on the same employees to the State of Ohio. On November 8, 1945, respondent was notified that interest and penalties in the amount of $2,024.36 were due. It paid the interest assessment of $335.37 on October 13, 1945, and the penalty of $1,688.99 on December 15, 1945. On June 17, 1946, respondent filed a claim for a refund under section 578 of the law which became effective March 22, 1946. Respondent’s application for a refund was made within the time fixed by subdivision 6 of section 570 of the law. On August 22, 1946, the commissioner denied the claim for a refund on the ground that section 578 as it presently exists did not become effective until March 22, 1946 (L. 1946, eh. 192), which was subsequent to the date on which the payment was made. Respondent requested a hearing and the referee sustained the commissioner’s determination on the ground that the provisions of section 578 were not retroactive. Respondent then appealed to the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which reversed the referee’s decision and granted the refund on the ground that the statute is retroactive. Decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent. Present.— Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Poster and Russell, JJ.
### Part C—Technology Transfer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 20, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), GlobalPlatform, Inc. (“GlobalPlatform”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recover of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: GlobalPlatform, Inc., Foster City, CA. The nature and scope of GlobalPlatform's standards development activities are: (1) to Define, adopt, and evolve appropriate standards and specifications, including but not limited to standards and specifications for smart cards, systems and devices; (2) to facilitate and promote the development of systems and software applications for multiple application smart cards infrastructure; (3) to develop other conventions needed to facilitate cross-industry application loading, such as card management, security, key management and personalization; and (4) to complement and enhance other smart card specifications, standards, and industry groups as appropriate.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-25849  Filed 11-19-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
**EXHIBIT 23.1****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**Stratos International, Inc.Chicago, Illinois     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements onForm S-3(Nos. 333-87082and 333-83820) andForm S-8 (Nos.333-52516,333-97102,333-81836, 333-69284,333-69284 and333-66258) of StratosInternational, Inc. of our report dated June 14, 2006,relating to the consolidated financial statements which appearin this 10-K.     /s/ BDO Seidman, LLPChicago, IllinoisJuly 27, 2006
§ 998.10 Appointments of officer candidates. ( a ) The Secretary shall determine the number of appointments of officer candidates annually.
( b ) Applicants for an appointment as an officer candidate shall meet all qualifications described in § 998.11.
( c ) Selection and appointment of officer candidates shall be made according to the procedures described in § 998.12.
( d ) The Secretary may dismiss any officer candidate from the NOAA Corps Basic Officer Training Class who, during the candidate's term as an officer candidate, the Secretary considers unsatisfactory in either academics or conduct, or not adapted for a career in the NOAA Corps. Officer candidates shall be subject to all rules governing discipline prescribed by the Director.
( e ) Each officer candidate shall sign an agreement with the Secretary regarding the officer candidate's term of service in the NOAA Corps, which shall provide that the candidate agrees to: ( 1 ) Complete the course of instruction of the NOAA Corps Basic Officer Training Class;
( 2 ) Upon graduation from the Basic Officer Training Class program, accept an appointment, if tendered, to the grade of ensign; and
( 3 ) Serve on active duty in the NOAA Corps for at least four years immediately after such appointment.
( f ) An officer candidate or former officer candidate who is on active duty but who has not yet met their initial service obligation under paragraph (e)(3) of this section shall be considered to be in breach of their written agreement if they do not fulfill the terms of their service.
( g ) An individual found to be in breach of their written agreement shall be subject to the repayment provisions of § 998.30.
DENIED and Opinion Filed June 1, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-23-00532-CV

IN RE KARLA D. STOVER AND ROBERT J.S. THOMPSON, Relators

Original Proceeding from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-07079

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Pedersen, III, Nowell, and Miskel

Opinion by Justice Miskel

Before the Court is relators’ May 31, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus 

wherein relators seek relief from the trial court’s denial of their motion to stay. 

Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relators to demonstrate that the trial 

court clearly abused its discretion and that they lack an adequate remedy by appeal. 

In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. 

proceeding). 

After reviewing relators’ petition and the record before us, we conclude that 

relators have failed to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we 

deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. 
–2–

We also deny relators’ motion for emergency stay of proceedings as moot.

230532f.p05

/Emily Miskel//

EMILY MISKEL

JUSTICE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

TRAVISWILFORD BOWLES, Petitioner, vs. THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE; AND THE HONORABLE CONNIE J. STEINHEIMER, DISTRICT JUDGE, Res•ondents. No. 84929 

# FILED JUL 29 2022 ELIZABETHA.BROWN CLERKgFSiPREME COURT BY DEPUll< ORDERDENYING PETITION This is an original pro se petition for a writ ofmandamus or in the alternative to show cause pursuant to NRS 34.160 et seq. seeking to compelthe district court to conduct an evidentiary hearingand consider the merits ofpetitioner's habeas petition.

This court has originaljurisdiction to issue writs ofmandamus and the issuance of such extraordinary relief is within this court's sole discretion. See Nev. Const. art. 6, § 4; D.R. Horton, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 123 Nev. 468, 474-75, 168 P.3d 731, 736-37 (2007). Petitioner bears the burden to show that extraordinary relief is warranted and such reliefis proper only when there is no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 841, 844 (2004).

Although petitioner provided a brief affidavit wherein he references the dismissal ofa habeaspetition, he has not provided this court with anyrecord or documentation in support ofhis claims and necessaryfor thiscourt's consideration ofthepetition. SeeNRAP 21(a)(4) (providingthat petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(01 1947A 44#2P.understand[ing] the matters set forth in the petition"). We conclude that

petitioner has failed to demonstrate our intervention by extraordinary writ is warranted. Therefore, we decline to exercise our originaljurisdiction in this matter. See NRAP 21(b). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

# P rit,ALA Parraguirre C.J.

J. Hardesty 

## Al•ZSbas-. 0 J. Stiglich

cc: Hon. Connie J. Steinheimer, District Judge Travis Wilford Bowles Attorney General/Carson City Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A .46t,o 2
Editorial Note on Part 4
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 80 FR 70154, Nov. 13, 2015.

§ 4.3 Records under the FOIA. ( a ) Records under the FOIA include all Government records, regardless of format, medium or physical characteristics, and electronic records and information, audiotapes, videotapes, Compact Disks, DVDs, and photographs.
( b ) In response to a FOIA request, the Department has no obligation to create, compile, or obtain from outside the Department a record to satisfy a request (for example, extrapolating information from existing agency records, reformatting available information, preparing new electronic programs or databases, or creating data through calculations of rations, proportions, percentages, trends, frequency distributions, correlations, or comparisons). In complying with a request for records (including data and other electronically-stored information), whether the Department creates or compiles records (as by undertaking significant programming work) or merely extracts them from an existing database is fact dependent. The Department shall undertake reasonable efforts to search for records stored in electronic format (including data and other electronically-stored information).
( c ) Department officials may, upon request, create and provide new records to the public pursuant to statutes that authorize the creation and provision of new records for a fee, such as the first paragraph of 15 U.S.C. 1525, or in accordance with authority otherwise provided by law. Such creation and provision of records is outside the scope of the FOIA.
( d ) Components shall preserve all correspondence pertaining to the requests they receive under this subpart, as well as copies of all requested records, until disposition or destruction is authorized by Title 44 of the United States Code or the National Archives and Records Administration's General Records Schedule 4.2, Information Access and Protection Records. Components shall not dispose of records while they are the subject of a pending request, appeal, or lawsuit under the FOIA.
[66 FR 65632, Dec. 20, 2001, as amended at 79 FR 62558, Oct. 20, 2014; 83 FR 39589, Aug. 10, 2018]
ADVANCED NOTIFICATION OF 

SHIPMENT OF CATEGORY 1 AND/OR 2 

RADIOACTIVE SOURCES 

In accordance with 10 CFR Part 110.50(c)(3)(ii) 

of the U.S. NRC Regulations

NRC Form 830 (04-10-2024)

SEND COMPLETED FORM TO:

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 

ATTN: Headquarters Operation Center 

Email: hoo.hoc@nrc.gov (Preferred Reporting Method) 

Fax: (301) 816-5151 (Alternative Reporting Method)

A Name of individual and licensee making the 

notification; address and telephone number:

B Recipient name, location, and address 

(if different than above):

C Name, location, address, contact name and 

telephone number for exporting facility:

D

Radionuclide(s) and activity level in TBq, both 

for single and aggregate shipments:

Total Activity Level (TBq):

E Make, model and serial number, for any 

Category 1 and 2 sealed sources, if available:

F End-use in the U.S.:

G

Shipment date from the exporting facility: 

(MM/DD/YYYY)

H

Estimated arrival date at the end use location: 

(MM/DD/YYYY) 

NRC or agreement state license number to 

possess the import in the U.S.:

Expiration date of license: (MM/DD/YYYY)

REPORT OF IMPORT

NRC FORM 830

(04-10-2024)

10 CFR 110.50(c)(3)(ii)

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY OMB: NO. 3150-0036 EXPIRES: 04/30/2027 

Reference Number:

Comments:

Estimated burden per response to comply with this mandatory collection request: 30 minutes. This form 

allows the NRC to request additional information from licensees to determine whether a license should be 

revoked, suspended, or modified. Send comments regarding burden estimate to the FOIA, Library, and 

Information Collections Branch, (T-6 A10M), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 

20555-001, or by email to Infocollects.Resource@nrc.gov, and to the and the OMB reviewer at: OMB 

Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, (3150-0036), Attn: Desk Officer for the Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission, 725 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20503. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a 

person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the document requesting or requiring 

the collection displays a currently valid OMB control number.
### §7671. Authority for program

As part of the Educational Assistance Program, the Secretary may carry out a scholarship program under this subchapter. The program shall be known as the Department of Veterans Affairs Employee Incentive Scholarship Program (hereinafter in this subchapter referred to as the "Program"). The purpose of the Program is to assist, through the establishment of an incentive program for individuals employed in the Veterans Health Administration, in meeting the staffing needs of the Veterans Health Administration for health professional occupations for which recruitment or retention of qualified personnel is difficult.

(Added Pub. L. 105–368, title VIII, §802(a), Nov. 11, 1998, 112 Stat. 3352; amended Pub. L. 107–14, §8(a)(16), June 5, 2001, 115 Stat. 35.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2001—Pub. L. 107–14 substituted "hereinafter" for "hereafter".
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Packard Motor Car Co. of New York, Respondent, against William E. Boyland et al., Constituting the Tax Commission of the City of New York, Appellants. [4650 Broadway, Borough of Manhattan.]

Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.