alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 911.7 Continuation of the NOAA Data Collection Systems. ( a ) NOAA expects to continue to operate DCS on its geostationary and polar-orbiting satellites, subject to the availability of future appropriations. However, viable commercial space-based alternatives may eventually obviate the need for NOAA to operate its own space-based DCS.
( b ) If use of the system in support of NOAA programs increases, it eventually may be necessary to the further restrict system usage by other users. If such restrictions on use become necessary, or in the event that NOAA discontinues operation of GOES and/or POES, NOAA will provide, to the maximum extent practicable, advance notice and an orderly transition.
( c ) NOAA will not be responsible for any losses resulting from the nonavailability of the NOAA DCS.
exv10w1



 





Exhibit 10.1




Amendment No. 5

To License Agreement




     This Amendment No. 5 to License Agreement (the “Amendment”), entered into on July 31,
2007, with an effective date as of July 1, 2007, by and between Metromedia Company, a Delaware
general partnership, and Metromedia International Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation.



W I T N E S S E T H :




     WHEREAS, Metromedia Company (the “Licensor”) and Metromedia International Group, Inc. (the
“Licensee”) are parties to that certain License Agreement, dated as of November 1, 1995, as amended
(the “License Agreement”), pursuant to which Licensor granted to Licensee a license to use the
Licensor’s trade name and trademark “Metromedia” in accordance with the terms and conditions of
the License Agreement; and



     WHEREAS, both Licensor and Licensee have agreed to amend the License Agreement to extend the
Term of the License Agreement;



     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual premises and covenants made herein and other
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Licensor and
Licensee agree as follows:




	1.	 	Capitalized Terms





     All capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in
the License Agreement.




	2.	 	Term





     Paragraph 2 of the License Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following:




     “2. This Agreement and the rights and licenses granted under Paragraph 1 shall be in
effect until December 31, 2008, unless earlier terminated as provided herein (the “Term”).”




	3.	 	Miscellaneous






	 	3.1	 	Except as specifically provided herein, nothing contained in this Amendment
shall be deemed to modify in any respect the terms, provisions or conditions of the
License Agreement, and such terms, provisions and conditions shall remain in full force
and effect.
	 
	 	3.2	 	This Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of Licensor,
Licensee and their respective permitted successors and assigns.




 









 










IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Licensor and Licensee have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first
written above.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	LICENSOR:



Metromedia Company

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/  Stuart Subotnick
 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	LICENSEE:



Metromedia International Group, Inc.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Mark S. Hauf
 	 
	 	 	Mark S. Hauf, President
Exhibit 32








Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I,  Cyrus Boga, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 of Tremont Fair, Inc. fully complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Tremont Fair, Inc.





Date:  May 12, 2010





By:           /s/ Cyrus Boga


Cyrus Boga,


Chief Executive Officer
#### § 1000.30 Directorate for Laboratory Sciences.

The Directorate for Laboratory Sciences, which is managed by the Associate Executive Director for Laboratory Sciences, is responsible for conducting engineering analyses and testing of consumer products, supporting the development of voluntary and mandatory standards, and supporting the Agency's compliance activities through product safety assessments. A wide variety of products are tested and evaluated to determine the causes of failure and the hazards presented. Product safety tests involve mechanical, electrical, and combustion engineering, as well as thermal and chemical analyses. Test protocols are developed, test fixtures and setups are designed and fabricated, and tests are conducted following the requirements and guidance of voluntary and mandatory standards and/or using sound engineering and scientific judgment. The Laboratory participates with and supports other agency directorates on multi-disciplinary teams in the development of voluntary and mandatory standards. The Laboratory coordinates and cooperates with other Federal agencies, private industry, and consumer interest groups by sharing engineering and scientific research, test, and evaluation expertise. Additionally, Corrective Action Plans, proposed by manufacturers to correct a product defect, are tested and evaluated to assure that the proposed changes adequately resolve the problem. Regulated products, such as children's products, sleepwear, and bicycle helmets, are routinely tested and evaluated for compliance with the Consumer Product Safety Act, the Federal Hazardous Substances Act, the Flammable Fabrics Act, and the Poison Prevention Packaging Act. The Directorate is composed of the Mechanical Engineering Division, the Electrical Engineering Division (which includes flammable fabrics), and the Chemical Division. Overall, the directorate provides engineering, scientific, and other technical expertise to all entities within the Consumer Product Safety Commission.
### SUBCHAPTER I—FINDINGS, DECLARATIONS, AND DEFINITIONS
s CodeFundamentals

gy and hnolo te Tec Concre
References

 Design and Control 

Design and Control 

Concrete Mixtures, 

PCA 2002 (rev 2008PCA 2002 (rev. 2008

 Fundamentals of Co

CD062 PCA 2007 CD062, PCA 2007
Up to 8% Air Up to 8% Air

7-15% Cemen60-75% Aggre(Coarse and Fi(Coarse and Fi14-21% Wate

r
Types of Concrete

 Book Labc Rl 

ea 
Quality Concrete

 A mixture of CEMENT, WATER, and AGG

that will meet the requirements under that will meet the requirements under expected to serve.
Fresh Concrete Propert

 Consistenc Workability Uniformity Bleeding Setting & 

Hardening
Hardened Concrete Prope

 Drying Rate Strengt

h

 Durability Permeability 

Watertightn



A

brasion Res

 Volume Stab

C kC t Crac

k

Con

tro
ESSENTIALS of Quality Concret

1. Suitable Materials Suitable Materials2. Proper Proportioning, Mixing

Proper Proportioning, Mixing

and Transporting

3. Proper Placing & Consolidati

Proper Placing & Consolidati

4. Proper Finishing & Jointing Proper Finishing & Jointing5. Proper Curing Proper Curing 
Avoiding Problems

 Design- Constructibility Mix Design Materials Selection Placement Procedures Environment

Design

Workmanship 
Design-Constructibil

Constructibil

 Reinforcement location Tolerances Joints
Mix Design

 Mater w/cm Slump Streng Durab Aesthe
Materials Selection

 Cement Supplementa

Cementing M

 Water 

Agg g re

gates

 Admixtures
Placement

 Transpo Placeme Consolid Finishin C i ur ng
Environment

 Hot & Cold P

Hot

& Cold P

 Freeze-Thaw  Chemical

Summary

Desired Properties of Concre

 Consistency Workability

 Drying 

 Workability  Strengt Uniformity

l d

 Durabi Permea

 Bleeding Setting & 

Watert

 Volume 

Hardening Crack C
No. II-09-034 June 9, 2009 

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 562-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 562-4416 

NRC SCHEDULES PUBLIC MEETING TO REVIEW PROPOSED 

NEW DEVELOPMENT LINE AT NUCLEAR FUEL SERVICES 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a public meeting for 

Wednesday, June 17, to discuss the results of a readiness review inspection at Nuclear Fuel 

Services. The inspection is related to the Erwin, Tenn., facility’s license amendment authorizing 

a new commercial development line. 

The meeting is scheduled to begin at 4 p.m. at the NFS Training Center, located at 1650 

Jackson Love Highway in Erwin. The NRC staff will discuss the preliminary results of an 

operational readiness review inspection. The NFS license amendment requires a review to verify 

that preparations are complete and adequate before the company can launch the new process line. 

The line will convert uranium hexafluoride into either uranium oxide or uranyl nitrate. Those 

compounds would then be either transferred to the applicable NFS customer or used in other 

NFS lines to process fuel for commercial nuclear use. 

 

The public is invited to attend the meeting and will have opportunities before and after 

the session to ask questions and receive more information from NRC staff. 

The new line was authorized by the NRC on May 11 in the form of a license amendment. 

An Environmental Assessment prepared in conjunction with the license amendment concluded 

that the new line would not have a significant impact on the environment. The company will not 

be allowed to operate the new line until it meets all NRC requirements. 

More information on the meeting can be accessed through the NRC’s public electronic 

reading room on the Internet at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. The meeting notice 

can be accessed by entering ML091560379 when prompted. 

 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
#### In the Matter of Opening and Extending Washington Avenue from East River to Jackson Avenue, etc.

Motion denied. The original exhibit may be produced and submitted to the court on the argument. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ.
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Bonnie L. McNamara, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           the annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of id-Confirm, Inc. for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of id-Confirm, Inc.

Date: January 19, 2006

/s/ Bonnie L. McNamara                  

Bonnie L. McNamara 

Chief Financial Officer 

(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
#### § 904.4 Computation of time periods.

For a NOVA, NOPS or NIDP, the 30-day response period begins to run on the date the notice is received. All other time periods begin to run on the day following the service date of the document, paper, or event that begins the time period. Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal holidays will be included in computing such time, except that when such time expires on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, in which event such period will be extended to include the next business day. This method of computing time periods also applies to any act, such as paying a civil penalty, required by this part to take place within a specified period of time. When the period of time prescribed or allowed is less than 11 days, intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays will be excluded in the computation.

[71 FR 12448, Mar. 10, 2006, as amended at 87 FR 38936, June 30, 2022]
First Department,

May, 1915.

#### Marie Dudley, Appellant, *v.*Edward Dudley, Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 1st dayof April, 1915, granting a motion to dismiss the action and to vacate all proceedings therein.

Per Curiam:

It is clear that the court has jurisdiction of the cause of action, and nothing appears to justify the court in refusing to continue jurisdiction. The order appealed from is, therefore, reversed, with ten *938dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughhlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
§ 700.30 Policy. ( a ) Allocation orders will: ( 1 ) Be used only when there is insufficient supply of a material, service, or facility to satisfy national defense requirements through the use of the priorities authority or when the use of the priorities authority would cause a severe and prolonged disruption in the supply of materials, services, or facilities available to support normal U.S. economic activities; and
( 2 ) Not be used to ration materials or services at the retail level.
( b ) Allocation orders, when used, will be distributed equitably among the suppliers of the materials, services, or facilities being allocated and not require any person to relinquish a disproportionate share of the civilian market.
[79 FR 47567, Aug. 14, 2014]
#### ALLEN et al. v. ASHELL.

(Opinion filed May 14, 1910.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Brown County. Hon. J. H. McCoy, *Judge.*

Action by Hiram A. Allen and another against Bernard Ashell. From a judgment for plaintiffs, and an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

*'Bruell*& *Morris,*for appellant.

*Taubman*& *Williamson,*for respondent.

WHITING, P. J.

This cause is before us upon appeal from a decree of the circuit court in favor of the plaintiff, and also from the order of said court denying a new trial. This cause was tried in the circuit court before Judge McCOY, then judge of the circuit court in and for -the Fifth judicial circuit of this state, but now one of the judges of this court. Judge McCOY being disqualified *406to hear this' cause upon appeal, and the said appeal having been duly considered by the four remaining -members of this bench, and they being equally divided in their views as to- the merits of the appeal herein, it is ordered that the judgment of the' lower . court and the order denying a new trial herein be, and the same are, in all things affirmed.
No: II-14-016 April 3, 2014

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416 

NRC Schedules Open House April 15 to Discuss Agency’s 

Assessment of Farley Nuclear Power Plant 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled an open house for April 15 to talk to people in 

the community about the agency’s assessment of the Farley nuclear power plant during 2013. The plant, 

operated by Southern Nuclear Operating Co., is located near Columbia, Ala., about 18 miles east of Dothan.

The open house is scheduled to run from 3-5 p.m. at the Alabama Midland Railroad Depot, 312 

Midland Street in Ashford, Ala.

NRC staff members will be available to answer questions on the performance of the Farley plant, as 

well as the overall NRC role in ensuring safe plant operations.

“Our resident and region-based inspectors spend many hours monitoring plant activities to ensure that 

the plant operates safely,” said NRC Region II Administrator Victor McCree. “We hold these meetings every 

year to make our staff available to people who live close to the plant and answer questions about our 

oversight.”

A letter sent from the NRC Region II office to plant officials addresses the performance of both Farley 

units during 2013. 

During 2013, the NRC found that both Farley units operated in a manner that preserved public health 

and safety and met all NRC objectives. The NRC issued a violation related to the plant’s emergency plan. That 

issue stems from a calculation error in the radiological values which would be used to declare emergency 

levels. The issue was identified by Southern Nuclear and found by the NRC to have low to moderate safety 

significance. The company has corrected the error in the emergency plan. However, it will result in an

additional NRC inspection this year. Otherwise, the plant will receive the NRC’s normal detailed inspections 

in 2014.

Current performance information for Farley Unit 1 and Unit 2 is available on the NRC website.
407 P.2d 361

#### STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Clark REYNOLDS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 7879.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Nov. 1, 1965.

Atwood *&*Malone, Bob F. Turner, Roswell, for appellant.

Boston E. Witt, Atty. Gen., Oliver' E. Payne, Deputy Atty. Gen., Roy G. Hill,

*522Frank Bachicha, Jr., Asst. Attys. Gen., Santa Fe, for appellee.

MOISE, Justice.

This'case presents the identical question decided this date in State v. Dalrymple, 75 N.M., 514, 407 P.2d 356, and the two cases were consolidated for argument here. The decision announced in State v. Dalrymple is controlling here, and this case is accordingly -rewersed and remanded to the trial court with instructions to grant a new trial on the information charging defendant as a habitual offender.

It is so ordered.

CARMODY, C. J., and CHAVEZ, NOBLE and COMPTON, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BeestonEnterprises Ltd, a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB forthe quarter ending March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the "Report"), I, Brian Smith, President/Treasurer/CEO/CFO of theCompany, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations ofthe Company. 

 

 

***/s/ Brian Smith                                           ***

Brian Smith, President,Treasurer,CEO,CFO

Dated: May 14, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 227 (Friday, November 26, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 68886]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26110]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Department of the Air Force, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to delete systems of records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Air Force is deleting a system of 
records notice from its existing inventory of record systems subject to 
the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This proposed actions will be effective without further notice 
on December 27, 2004, unless comments are received which result in a 
contrary determination.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the Air Force Privacy Act Manager, Office 
of the Chief Information Officer, AF-CIO/P, 1155 Air Force Pentagon, 
Washington, DC 20330-1155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. Anne Rollins at (703) 696-6280.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department of the Air Force systems of 
records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as 
amended, have been published in the Federal Register and are available 
from the address above.
    The proposed deletion is not within the purview of subsection (r) 
of the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires 
the submission of a new or altered system report.

    Dated: November 19, 2004.
Jeannette Owings-Ballard,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
F061 AFMC A

System name:
    Aeromedical Research Data (June 11, 1997, 62 FR 31793).
    Reason: Records are now being maintained under the system of 
records F044 AF SG E, entitled ``Medical Record System'' last published 
in the Federal Register December 9, 2003, 68 FR 68609.

[FR Doc. 04-26110 Filed 11-24-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
### SUBCHAPTER III—UPPER ATMOSPHERE RESEARCH
Exhibit 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Tabatha III, Inc.,
the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending June
30, 2003, (the "Report"), I, I, John Ballard, Principal Financial
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/s/ John Ballard
-----------------------
John Ballard
Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer


Date: March 16, 2004
#### Frank X. Lo Sacco *v.*Debra M. Young et al.

*Frank X. Lo Sacco,*pro se, in support of the petition.

Decided April 21, 1988

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 13 Conn. App. 827, is granted, limited to the issue: “Does unexcused untimeliness in the filing of a motion to set aside a verdict and for a new trial automatically limit the scope of appellate review, even when there was no objection at the trial to the untimeliness of the motion?”
No. IV-09-034 

Contact: Victor Dricks 

Phone: (817) 860-8128 

 

 October 29, 2009 

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING 

ON SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION 

 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Southern California 

Edison Co. officials on Nov. 5 to discuss the results of a recently completed independent safety 

culture assessment and the status of performance improvements at San Onofre Nuclear 

Generating Station. SCE operates the plant, located near San Clemente, Calif. 

 The meeting, which will be open to public observation, will begin at 6:30 p.m. in the 

Trestles Room of the Doubletree Guest Suites at 34402 Pacific Coast Highway, Dana Point, 

Calif. 

 The public will have an opportunity to observe and ask questions of NRC staff before the 

meeting is adjourned. 

 ### 

 

 NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125 

Telephone: (817) 860-8128