alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

### MEMORANDUM

TO: Public Record for the 2008 E ffluent Guidelines Program Plan EPA Docket Number EPA-HQ- OW-2006-0771 (www.regulations.gov)

FROM: Carey A. Johnston, P.E. USEPA/OW/OST ph: (202) 566 1014 johnston.carey@epa.gov

DATE: 23 April 2008

SUBJECT: American Dental Association and National Association of Clean Water Agencies Meeting Summary (22 April 2008)

Introduction

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) met with representatives from the American Dental Association (ADA) and the Na tional Association of Clean Water Agencies (NACWA) on 22 April 2008 to discuss the EPA Offi ce of Water’s (OW) De tailed Study of the Health Services Industry (HSI). EPA identified the HSI, wh ich includes dental facilities, for additional review in the final 2006 E ffluent Guidelines Program Plan. 1 Topics of the meeting include ADA’s amendments to its best manageme nt practices (BMPs) for dental amalgam, results of studies showing the impacts of using amalgam separators on POTW influent, biosolids, and the comments from NACWA and ADA on th e preliminary 2008 Effluent Guidelines Program Plan. 2 Table 1 at the end of this memora ndum lists the meeting participants.

Ms. Mary Smith, Director of EPA’s OW Engineering and Analysis Division, and Ms. Samantha Lewis gave a brief ove rview of EPA’s review of the public comments and data for the HSI Detailed Study. Ms. Smith explained that EPA’ s goal for the dental amalgam portion of the Health Services Industry Detailed Study is to collect good in formation on the mercury discharges from dental offices and the best practices and technologies for controllin g these discharges. She noted that EPA will use this information to info rm its decision-making on whether to initiate an effluent guidelines rulemaking. Meeting partic ipants discussed the NACWA and ADA public comments, submitted in response to the Agency’s preliminary 2008 Plan, regarding options for a national voluntary partnership program. Th e meeting concluded with NACWA and ADA agreeing to develop a draft framework for this national voluntary partne rship program and to share the draft framework with EPA.

1 See 21 December 2006; 71 FR 76644.
2 See 30 October 2007; 72 FR 61335. [Available at: http://epa.gov/guide/304m/].2 U.S. EPA/NACWA/ADA Meeting Participants EPA Headquarters (Washington, DC) Tuesday, 22 April 2008

Name Organization Phone Number E-mail

William Walsh Pepper Hamilton LLP (attorney for ADA) 202-220-1424 walshw@pepperlaw.com

Jerome Bowman American Dental Association 312-440-2877 bowmanj@ada.org

Chris Hornback National Association of Clean Water Agencies 202-833-9106, x 302 chornback@nacwa.org

Elizabeth Toot-Levy † Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District 216-641-6000, x 2236 toot-levye@neorsd.org

Keith J. Linn † Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District 216-641-6000 linnk@neorsd.org
Carey Johnston U.S. EPA, Office of Water 202-566-1014 johnston.carey@epa.gov

Jan Goodwin U.S. EPA, Office of Water 202-566-1060 goodwin.janet@epa.gov Mary T. Smith U.S. EPA, Office of Water 202-566-1000 smith.maryt@epa.gov Samantha Lewis U.S. EPA, Office of Water 202-566-1058 lewis.samantha@epa.gov † Participated via teleconference.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 06, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 06, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15D0443. RANDSTAD US et al. v. DARRIN REINACHER.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

15CV00638
§ 1016.4 Testimony of Commission employees in private litigation. ( a ) No Commission employee shall testify in his or her official capacity in any private litigation, without express authorization from the Commission's General Counsel. The Commission may, in its discretion, review a decision by the General Counsel to authorize such employee testimony. The General Counsel shall in such instances, where time permits, advise the Commission, on a no objection basis, of the authorization of such employee testimony.
( b ) If any Commission employee is served with a subpoena seeking testimony in private litigation, he or she must immediately notify the Office of the General Counsel. The Office of the General Counsel, in conjunction with the Department of Justice, will ( 1 ) take steps to quash the subpoena or
( 2 ) direct the employee to appear in response to the subpoena but refuse to testify on the ground that it is prohibited by this section.
( c ) If the General Counsel becomes aware of private litigation in which testimony by a Commission employee would be in the interests of the Commission, he or she may authorize such testimony, notwithstanding paragraph (b) of this section. The Commission may, in its discretion, review a decision by the General Counsel to authorize such employee testimony. The General Counsel shall in such instances, where time permits, advise the Commission, on a no objection basis, of the authorization of such employee testimony. Any such testimony must be provided in a way that minimizes the use of Commission resources as much as possible.
### §14322. Approval of development plans, strategy statements, and projects

(a) Annual Review and Approval Required.—The Appalachian Regional Commission annually shall review and approve, in accordance with section 14302 of this title, state and regional development plans and strategy statements, and any multistate subregional plans which may be developed.

(b) Application Process.—An application for a grant or for other assistance for a specific project under this subtitle shall be made through the state member of the Commission representing the applicant. The state member shall evaluate the application for approval. To be approved, the state member must certify, and the Federal Cochairman must determine, that the application—

(1) implements the Commission-approved state development plan;

(2) is included in the Commission-approved strategy statement;

(3) adequately ensures that the project will be properly administered, operated, and maintained; and

(4) otherwise meets the requirements for assistance under this subtitle.

(c) Affirmative Vote Requirement Deemed Met.—After the appropriate state development plan and strategy statement are approved, certification by a state member, when joined by an affirmative vote of the Federal Cochairman, is deemed to satisfy the requirements for affirmative votes for decisions under section 14302(a) of this title.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1264.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 14322(a) | 40 App.:303 (1st sentence). | Pub. L. 89–4, title III, §303, Mar. 9, 1965, 79 Stat. 20; Pub. L. 90–103, title I, §121, Oct. 11, 1967, 81 Stat. 265; Pub. L. 94–188, title I, §120, Dec. 31, 1975, 89 Stat. 1086; Pub. L. 107–149, §13(i), Mar. 12, 2002, 116 Stat. 72. |
| 14322(b) | 40 App.:303 (2d, 3d sentences). | |
| 14322(c) | 40 App.:303 (last sentence). | |

Section
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-8022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CHRISTOPHER DAMON SPENCER, a/k/a Dog,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief 

District Judge. (2:11-cr-00030-RBS-FBS-1; 2:12-cv-00447-RBS)

Submitted: February 26, 2013 Decided: March 1, 2013

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Damon Spencer, Appellant Pro Se. Sherrie Scott 

Capotosto, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Damon Spencer seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or 

wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see MillerEl v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district 

court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Spencer has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
| 1. | Such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,      2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for      the period ending March 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations      of China Growth Development,Inc. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      May 27, 2008                                                |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                   |
| /s/ Sam      Liu                                                       |
| Sam      LiuChief      Executive Officer, Chief      Financial Officer |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-53,914] 

Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on December 31, 2003, in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at InterMetro Industries Corporation, Cucamonga, California. 

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 12th day of January, 2004. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 04-2612 Filed 2-5-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
Editorial Note on Part 4
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 80 FR 70154, Nov. 13, 2015.

§ 4.22 Definitions. ( a ) All terms used in this subpart which are defined in 5 U.S.C. 552a shall have the same meaning herein.
( b ) As used in this subpart: ( 1 ) *Act* means the “Privacy Act of 1974, as amended (5 U.S.C. 552a)”.
( 2 ) *Appeal* means a request by an individual to review and reverse an initial denial of a request from that individual for correction or amendment.
( 3 ) *Component* means any office, division, bureau or other unit of the Department listed in Appendix A to this part (except that a regional office of a larger office or other unit does not constitute a separate component).
( 4 ) *Department* means the Department of Commerce.
( 5 ) *Inquiry* means either a request for general information regarding the Act and this subpart or a request from an individual (or that individual's parent or guardian) that the Department determine whether it has any record in a system of records that pertains to that individual.
( 6 ) *Person* means any human being and also shall include, but is not limited to, corporations, associations, partnerships, trustees, receivers, personal representatives, and public or private organizations.
( 7 ) *Privacy Act Officer* means those officials, identified in Appendix B to this part, who are authorized to receive and act upon inquiries, requests for access, and requests for correction or amendment.
( 8 ) *Request for access* means a request from an individual or an individual's parent or guardian to see a record pertaining to that individual in a particular system of records.
( 9 ) *Request for correction or amendment* means a request from an individual or an individual's parent or guardian that the Department change (by correction, amendment, addition or deletion) a particular record pertaining to that individual in a system of records.
( 10 ) *Un-redacted SSN Mailed Documents Listing (USMDL)* means the Department approved list, as posted at *www.commerce.gov/privacy ,* designating those documents for which the inclusion of SSN is determined to be necessary to fulfill a compelling Department business need when the documents are requested by individuals outside the Department or other Federal agencies, as determined jointly by the Senior Agency Official for Privacy and the Departmental Privacy Act Officer.
[66 FR 65632, Dec. 20, 2001, as amended at 86 FR 21935, Apr. 26, 2021]
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Prime Sun Power Inc. on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Olivier de Vergnies, Interim
Principal Executive Officer and Interim Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge
that:





(1) 
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) 
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:
August 20, 2009






By:
            /s/
      Olivier de VergniesName: Olivier
      de VergniesTitle:   Acting
      Principal Executive Officer and
              Acting Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.2


                         IDI Global, Inc.


                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

      I, Melanie Young, Principal Financial Officer of IDI Global, Inc.
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

(1)   the annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
      December 31, 2002, as amended, fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information contained in the Form 10-KSB, as amended, fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of the Company.



Date: May 14, 2003
                                           /s/ Melanie Young
                                          ____________________________________
                                          Melanie Young
                                          Principal Financial Officer
#### § 970.502 Consultation and cooperation with Federal agencies.

Prior to the issuance or transfer of an exploration license, the Administrator will continue the consultation and cooperation with other Federal agencies which were initiated pursuant to § 970.211. This consultation will be to assure compliance with, among other statutes, the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended, and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act. He also will consult, prior to any issuance, transfer, modification or renewal of a license, with any affected Regional Fishery Management Council established pursuant to section 302 of the Fishery Conservation and Management Act of 1976 (16 U.S.C. 1852) if the activities undertaken pursuant to such license could adversely affect any fishery within the Fishery Conservation Zone, or any anadromous species or Continental Shelf fishery resource subject to the exclusive management authority of the United States beyond such zone.
Unassociated Document


    China
      CITIC Bank

    Loan
      Certificate (1)


    
      	
              To
                Shenzhen Branch, China CITIC Bank:

              As
                approved by your bank, we borrowed the loan as follows from your
                bank.
                This loan certificate shall have the same legal force as loan agreement.
                This loan certificate shall come into effect when it has been signed
                and
                stamped by the authorized persons of both parties.

            
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
              Applicant

            	
               

            	
              Shenzhen
                BAK Battery Co., Ltd

            	
               

            	
              Loan
                No.

            	
               

            	
              (2007)
                Shenying Sundai Zi No. 006

            
	
              Currency

            	
               

            	
              RMB

            	
               

            	
              Amount

            	
               

            	
              50,000,000

            
	
              Usage

            	
               

            	
              Purchase
                of raw materials and others

            	
               

            	
              Loan
                start date

            	
               

            	
              April
                16, 2007

            
	
              Loan
                Term

            	
               

            	
              1
                year

            	
               

            	
              Loan
                termination date

            	
               

            	
              April
                16, 2008

            
	
              Annual
                rate

            	
               

            	
              5.751%

            	
               

            	
               

            	
               

            	
               

            
	
              Signature
                of Applicant

            	
               

            	
              Stamp
                of Applicant

            	
               

            	
              Signature
                of China CITIC Bank

            	
               

            	
              Stamp
                of China CITIC Bank

            
	
              /s/
                Xiangqian Li

            	
               

            	
               

            	
               

            	
              /s/Faling
                Wei
### §3118. Right of taking as addition to existing rights

The right to take possession and title in advance of final judgment in condemnation proceedings as provided by section 3114 of this title is in addition to any right, power, or authority conferred by the laws of the United States or of a State, territory, or possession of the United States under which the proceeding may be conducted, and does not abrogate, limit, or modify that right, power, or authority.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1147.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3118 | 40:258d. | Feb. 26, 1931, ch. 307, §4, 46 Stat. 1422. |

Section

The words "State, territory, or possession of the United States" are substituted for "State or Territory" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code.
Agency Spotlight

----

**January 1999**
**European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD)**The EBRD recentlypublished its Transition Report 1998.  The theme of this year's report is the financial sector intransition.  The report provides a two-page assessment of each country in which the EBRD hasoperations.  Each assessment includes time lines of important events in the transition process anda data table indicating progress in several areas.  The report includes country-by-country tableswith key economic data as well.  For more information, visit the EBRD's web site atwww.ebrd.com/english/region/tranrep/ or contact the EBRD Publications Desk by telephone:+44 (171) 338-7553, fax: +44 (171) 338-6102, or e-mail: [email protected].
**Eurasia Foundation**Eurasia Foundation recently launched the Synergy Program inthe Southern Caucasus to promote cross-border projects in regional business development,media, electronic communications, and municipal governance in Armenia, Azerbaijan, andGeorgia.  The program offers a forum to professional and technical organizations in the region topursue cooperation, with the ultimate goal of economic prosperity for these neighboringcountries.  For more information on the program, visit the foundation's web site atwww.eurasia.org or contact Michelle Maynard by telephone: (202) 234-7370, ext. 147, fax: (202)234-7377, or e-mail: [email protected].
Exhibit 32








Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I,  John D. Thomas, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 of Tremont Fair, Inc. fully complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Tremont Fair, Inc.





Date:  May 20, 2011





By:   /s/ John D. Thomas


John D. Thomas,


President and principal executive officer


and principal accounting officer