alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 0.8 The Chair. The Chair of the Commission is designated by the President, and, subject to the general policies of the Commission, is the executive and administrative head of the agency. The Chair presides at meetings of and hearings before the Commission and participates with other Commissioners in all Commission decisions. In rulemaking proceedings under section 18(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 57a(a)(1)(B)), the Chair serves as or may designate another Commissioner to serve as the Chief Presiding Officer or may appoint another person to serve as Chief Presiding Officer who is not responsible to any other official or employee of the Commission. Attached to the Office of the Chair, and reporting directly to the Chair, and through the Chair to the Commission, are the following staff units: ( a ) The Office of the Chief Privacy Officer, which ensures that the agency's practices and policies comply with applicable federal information privacy and security requirements and standards;
( b ) The Office of Congressional Relations, which coordinates all liaison activities with Congress;
( c ) The Office of Equal Employment Opportunity and Workplace Inclusion, which advises and assists the Chair and the organizational units in EEO policy and diversity management issues;
( d ) The Office of Policy Planning, which assists the Commission to develop and implement long-range competition and consumer protection policy initiatives;
( e ) The Office of Public Affairs, which furnishes information concerning Commission activities to news media and the public; and
( f ) The Office of Technology, which employs expertise in technology to strengthen and support law enforcement investigations and actions, advise and engage with FTC staff and the Commission on policy and research initiatives, and engage the public and relevant experts to understand trends and to advance the Commission's work.
[86 FR 38546, July 22, 2021, as amended at 88 FR 42874, July 5, 2023]
### §1130. Effect of division on other law

This division does not impair or affect the authorities or responsibilities relating to the procurement of real property conferred by division C of this subtitle and chapters 1 to 11 of title 40.

(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3690.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1130 | 41:405(h)(1). | Pub. L. 93–400, §6(h)(1), Aug. 30, 1974, 88 Stat. 797; Pub. L. 96–83, §4, Oct. 10, 1979, 93 Stat. 649; Pub. L. 98–191, §5, Dec. 1, 1983, 97 Stat. 1328; Pub. L. 104–106, title LVI, §5607(d), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 702. |

Section
§ 846.203 Agency responsibilities. ( a ) Employing offices must distribute the election forms provided by OPM to each eligible individual, including all individuals in a nonduty status.
( b ) An employing office must obtain documentation of the individual's receipt of the election form specified in paragraph (a) of this section and retain the documentation permanently in the individual's official personnel folder (or the equivalent). Acceptable documentation includes— ( 1 ) A statement of receipt signed by the individual, or
( 2 ) A signed postal return receipt showing that the election form was received at the individual's address.
NRC SCHEDULES PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS OVERSIGHT

OF NEW VOGTLE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNITS 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a meeting for Wednesday, Jan. 

9, 2013 to discuss the inspection and oversight process for two new nuclear units being built at 

Southern Nuclear’s Vogtle plant site near Waynesboro, Ga., about 26 miles southeast of 

Augusta.

The meeting, which is open to the public, will begin at 6 p.m. EST at the Augusta 

Technical College Waynesboro/Burke Campus, 216 Highway 24 South in Waynesboro.

At the meeting, NRC staff will be providing an update and seeking public comment on 

the NRC’s construction reactor oversight process, known as the cROP pilot program, at the 

Vogtle site. That program includes inspection, assessment, enforcement and the verification 

process to ensure that new nuclear power plants are built according to their approved design, 

their license and NRC regulations. 

“We hope people who live near the plant site or have an interest in the process will come 

out to give us their feedback on our overall process for ensuring the safety of the new units,” said

Fred Brown, NRC Region II deputy administrator for construction. 

The NRC has three construction resident inspectors at the Vogtle site, supplemented by 

additional inspectors from the regional office in Atlanta and NRC headquarters in Rockville, Md. 

The NRC staff issued operating licenses for two AP1000 reactors at the Vogtle site in 

early 2012. Southern Nuclear submitted its application for those units in March 2008. 

Additional information on the NRC construction reactor oversight process can be found 

at www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors/oversight/crop.html.

###

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No: II-12-069

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416

 

 December 28, 2012

E-mail: OPA2.Resource@nrc.gov
News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.
### §70109. Records and inspection

(a) Records.—The corporation shall keep—

(1) correct and complete records of account;

(2) minutes of the proceedings of its members, board of directors, and committees having any of the authority of its board of directors; and

(3) at its principal office, a record of the names and addresses of its members entitled to vote.

(b) Inspection.—A member entitled to vote, or an agent or attorney of the member, may inspect the records of the corporation for any proper purpose, at any reasonable time.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1349.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 70109 | 36:5610. | Sept. 23, 1996, Pub. L. 104–201, title XVIII, §1810, 110 Stat. 2762. |

Section

The word "records" is substituted for "books and records" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code. The words "This section may not be construed to contravene any applicable State law" are omitted as unnecessary.
Unassociated Document







     

    701
      N Green Valley Pkwy, Suite 200, Henderson, NV 89074 702-990-3387/ fax
      702-990-3301

    


    From
      The Desk Of:

    Stanley
      L. Teeple, Secretary

    stanteeple@msn.com

     

    SCHEDULE
      3.1(g)

    


    TO

    


    RESTRICTED
      EQUITY PURCHASE AGREEMENT

    

      The
        Company has AFFILIATE relationships with stock ownership as
        follows-

      


      	1-  	
               David
                Larson- CEO

            


      	2-  	
               Richard
                Haggart- Consultant

            


      	3-  	
               Steve
                Durdin- Director

            


      	4-  	
               Mark
                Thompson- CEO Hub Energy

            


      


      Their
        consent letters are attached to this Schedule
Table of Contents

EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-63918) of
Arden Realty Limited Partnership and in the related Prospectus of our report dated February 3, 2004,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements, as amended, of Arden Realty Limited Partnership
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 2003.

|Los Angeles, California March 30, 2004 |  | BY: /S/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
|-------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------
### SUBCHAPTER III—REHABILITATION AND POSTHOSPITALIZATION CARE PROGRAMS AND ASSISTANCE TO STATES AND LOCALITIES
|                                                   |
|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                                   |  |
| Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): | January 15, 2014 (January 15, 2014) |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | CLARCOR Inc. |   |
|   | (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) |   |

|                                                                 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                 |  |  |
| Delaware                                                        |  1-11024 | 36-0922490 |
| (State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation or organization)   |  (Commission File Number) | (I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.) |
|                                                            |   |   |
| 840 Crescent Centre Drive, Suite 600, Franklin, Tennessee 37067 |
| (Address of principal executive offices)                        |

|                                                           |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                           |  |
| Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: | 615-771-3100 |

|                                                                                     |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                     |
| No Change                                                                           |
| (Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.) |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
|   |   |
| o      | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|   |   |
| o      | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|   |   |
| o      | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|   |   |
| o      | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |
|   |   |
|   |   |

----

|                  |
|------------------|
|                  |  |  |  |
| January 15, 2014 |   | By | /s/ RICHARD M. WOLFSON |
| (Date)           |   |   | Richard M. Wolfson |
|             |   |   | Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
|             |   |   |   |
No. II-13-025 April 22, 2013

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416

NRC SCHEDULES REGULATORY CONFERENCE TO DISCUSS APPARENT 

CONSTRUCTION VIOLATION AT NEW SUMMER NUCLEAR UNITS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled a regulatory conference with South 

Carolina Electric & Gas to discuss the risk significance of an apparent violation related to the 

anchorage and spacing of rebar being used to reinforce concrete in the new units of the V.C. 

Summer nuclear station.

Units 2 and 3 at Summer are being built by SCE&G near Jenkinsville, S.C., about 26 

miles northwest of Columbia. Unit 1 has been in operation at the site since 1982.

The conference is scheduled for April 30 at 9:30 a.m. in the NRC’s Region II office, 

located at 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200, in Atlanta. The public is invited to attend 

and NRC officials will be available to answer questions after the business portion of the meeting.

SCE&G and NRC officials will discuss the safety significance of an inspection finding 

and apparent violation at the new Summer units. The NRC inspectors found that the anchorage 

and spacing of the rebar in the floor and walls of the unit did not comply with code requirements. 

The violation has been preliminarily classified as white, meaning it has low to moderate safety 

significance. 

The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings to assess construction performance. The 

colors start with green, and escalate to white, yellow or red, based on the significance of the 

issues. Inspection findings are updated on the NRC’s website each quarter. 

No decision on the final safety significance or any possible enforcement action will be 

made at the conference. Those decisions will be made and the results will be announced by NRC 

officials at a later time.

The NRC inspection report for the issue at Summer can be found on the NRC website. 

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave. NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
CUSTOMS AUTHORITIES IN NAKHODKA, RUSSIA

----

2 MAR 98
## Subtitle II—Other Advertising and Contract Provisions

Chapter
Sec.
61.
Advertising
6101
63.
General Contract Provisions
6301
65.
Contracts for Materials, Supplies, Articles, and Equipment Exceeding $10,000
6501
67.
Service Contract Labor Standards
6701
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# March 2012 Report on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206.

Accession Number: ML12093A123

Date Released: Friday, April 13, 2012

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML12093A127 - March 2012 Report on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of The Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206. (3 page(s), 4/12/2012)
    - ML12093A128 - Enclosure: March 2012 Report on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.201. (24 page(s), 4/13/2012)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
§ 1018.32 Compensation and travel expenses. ( a ) A single rate of compensation will be offered to members of all advisory committees with the exception of government employees and those individuals whose company or organization prohibits such payment. This rate shall be $100 per day for each day in attendance at the meeting and for each day of travel.
( b ) The Commission shall determine per diem and travel expenses for members, staffs, and consultants in accordance with section 7(d) of the Advisory Committee Act and section 11 of OMB Circular No. A-63.
( c ) Members of advisory committees, while engaged in the performance of their duties away from their homes or regular place of business, may be allowed travel expenses including per diem in lieu of expenses as authorized by 5 U.S.C. 5703.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ernest Green, Appellant.

[820 NYS2d 823]

Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Sheila A. DiTullio, J.), rendered November 15, 2004. The judgment convicted defendant, after a nonjury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree and escape in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him after a nonjury trial of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 220.09 [1]) and escape in the second degree (§ 205.10 [2]), defendant contends that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree because, inter alia, the People failed to establish his knowledge of the aggregate weight of the controlled substance that he possessed. We reject that contention, inasmuch as such knowledge is not an element of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree *(see*§ 15.20 [4]; *People v Davis,*244 AD2d 1003, 1004 [1997]). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]; *People v Alicea,*289 AD2d 939, 940 [2001], *lv denied*98 NY2d 648 [2002]), we conclude that the evidence is legally sufficient to support the conviction of both crimes *(see generally People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Furthermore, the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence *(see generally id.).*

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit. Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Scudder, Kehoe, Smith and Green, JJ.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.17
                                   AMENDMENT

     This Amendment, entered into between MEDIMMUNE, INC. ("Medimmune"), and
APPLIED MOLECULAR EVOLUTION, INC., f/k/a Ixsys, Inc. ("AME"), and effective on
the last date of Signature below, modifies and amends the Selection Agreement
dated effective February 24, 1999 (the "Agreement"), by and between Ixsys, Inc.
("IXSYS") and MEDIMMUNE.

                                   WITNESSETH

     WHEREAS, MEDIMMUNE and AME desire to amend the Agreement in order to modify
certain aspects of the antibody selection terms;

     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual covenants and
agreements herein set forth, the parties hereto agree as follows:

     IXSYS shall now be known as AME, and the designation AME shall replace the
designation IXSYS in the Agreement.

     1.   Section 1.1 of the Agreement is restated in its entirety to read as
          follows:

          1.1  Within thirty six (36) months after the EFFECTIVE DATE, MEDIMMUNE
     shall designate by written notice to AME, one (1) antibody for which
     MEDIMMUNE desires to have AME perform a separate research and development
     programs (each, a "PROGRAM") to modify such antibody. Within forty eight
     (48) months after the EFFECTIVE DATE, MEDIMMUNE shall designate by written
     notice to AME, one (1) additional antibody for which MEDIMMUNE desires to
     have AME perform a PROGRAM to modify such antibody.

     2.   Section 1.3 of the Agreement is restated in its entirety to read as
          follows:

          1.3  Within thirty (30) days after MEDIMMUNE delivers to AME the
     written notice described in Section 1.1 for a PROGRAM, provided that the
     parties mutually agree upon the antibody and the target ligand, the parties
     shall duly execute and deliver a Research and Assignment and License
     Agreement in the form attached hereto as Appendix A, with the blanks on
     Exhibit 1 thereto completed as provided above and only those modifications
     as the parties mutually agree in writing.

     This Amendment and the Agreement set forth the entire agreement and
understanding between the parties as to the subject matter thereof and
supercedes all prior agreements and understandings in this respect. There shall
be no amendments or modifications to this Amendment or the Agreement, except by
a written document which is signed by both parties.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have each caused this Amendment to be
signed and delivered by its duly authorized officer or representative as
indicated below.

MEDIMMUNE                               AME



By:  /s/ SCOTT KOENIG                   By: /s/ LAWRENCE E. BLOCH
   -----------------------------            ------------------------------------
Name: Scott Koenig                      Name: Lawrence E. Bloch
Title: SVP, Research                    Title: CFO & VP of Business Development

Date: 3-5-01                            Date: 3-8-01
#### § 930.126 Consistency appeal processing fees.

The Secretary shall collect as a processing fee such other fees from the appellant as are necessary to recover the full costs of administering and processing appeals to the Secretary under section 307(c) of the Act. All processing fees shall be assessed and collected no later than 60 days after publication of the Federal Register Notice closing the decision record. Failure to submit processing fees shall be grounds for extending the time for issuance of a decision pursuant to section 319(a)(2) of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1465(a)(2)) and § 930.130 of this subpart.
#### Frederick J. Zivic *v.*Kay Brooke

*Larry R. Levine,*in support of the petition.

Decided April 5, 1988

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 13 Conn. App. 821, is denied.
§ 0.7 Delegation of functions. ( a ) The Commission, under the authority provided by Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1961 (15 U.S.C. 41 note), may delegate, by published order or rule, certain of its functions to a division of the Commission, an individual Commissioner, an administrative law judge, or an employee or employee board, and retains a discretionary right to review such delegated action upon its own initiative or upon petition of a party to or an intervenor in such action.
( b ) The Commission delegates its functions, subject to certain limitations, when no quorum is available for the transaction of business. The delegate or delegates are authorized to act in instances in which no party or intervenor would be adversely affected by the delegated action and entitled to seek review by the Commission, as provided by section 1(b) of Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1961, or in instances in which all such adversely affected parties or intervenors have waived such a right. In actions in which at least one Commissioner is participating, this delegation is to the participating Commissioner or to the body of Commissioners who are participating. In actions in which no Commissioner is available or no Commissioner is participating, the General Counsel in consultation, where appropriate, with the Directors of the Bureaus of Consumer Protection, Competition, and Economics will exercise this delegated authority without power of redelegation. This delegation does not alter or affect other delegations to Commission staff. This delegation is only authorized for those instances in which the Commission lacks a quorum as set forth in Commission Rule 4.14(b), 16 CFR 4.14(b) (Commission quorum).
[83 FR 7110, Feb. 20, 2018, as amended at 86 FR 38546, July 22, 2021]