alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1    Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Western Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc. (the "Company") for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven P. Grimes Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company and James W. Kleifges as Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge: (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Steven P. GrimesName:Steven P. GrimesChief Executive Officer, President 
Chief Financial Officer and TreasurerDate:May 12, 2010/s/ James W. KleifgesName:James W. KleifgesChief Accounting OfficerDate:May 12, 2010
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00425-CV

University of Texas at Arlington

v.

Sandra Williams and Steve Williams

§

§

§

§

From the 352nd District Court

of Tarrant County (352-248890-10)

March 28, 2013

Opinion by Justice Dauphinot

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s order. It is ordered that the order of the trial 

court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that Appellant University of Texas at Arlington shall pay 

all of the costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By_________________________________

 Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
EXHIBIT 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-231090 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-211150 and 333-238290 on Form S-8 of our report dated February 8, 2022, relating to the consolidated financial statements of CNA Financial Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) and the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2021.





/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Chicago, Illinois


February 8, 2022
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-7837-6]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice of availability.

# SUMMARY:

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing the availability of the “Model Application/Information Request for CERCLA Service Station Dealer Exemption.”

# DATES:

The model was issued on November 8, 2004.

# ADDRESSES:

                        The model will be available on EPA's Web site at                         *http://www.epa.gov/​compliance/​resources/​policies/​cleanup/​superfund/​ssde-mod-appinfo.pdf.*

      ( print page 65597)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Susan Boushell, EPA's Office of Site Remediation Enforcement, (202) 564-2173 or                         *boushell.susan@epa.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On February 3, 2004 (69 FR 5147), EPA published a notice of availability for public comment on the “Draft Model CERCLA Application/Information Request for Service Station Dealers.” On July 20, 2004 (69 FR 43412), EPA published a notice of availability for public comment on a revised draft model, entitled “Draft Model Application/Information Request for CERCLA Service Station Dealer Exemption.” After careful consideration of the comments received, EPA revised and finalized the model application/ information request. The final model is available on EPA's Web site at                     *http://www.epa.gov/​ compliance/resources/policies/cleanup/superfund/ssde-mod-appinfo.pdf.*

Dated: November 8, 2004.

Susan E. Bromm,

Director, Office of Site Remediation Enforcement.

[FR Doc. 04-25305 Filed 11-12-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 19, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-40244

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TIM C. WILLIAMS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(C-02-CR-105-1)

--------------------

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Defendant-Appellant Tim C. Williams appealed his conviction,

sentence, and final order of criminal forfeiture imposed after he

pleaded guilty to conspiracy to launder money and conspiracy to

possess with intent to distribute more than five kilograms of

cocaine. Following our limited remand for the district court to

address Williams’s motion for reconsideration, we affirmed. United

States v. Williams, No. 02-41608, 2004 WL 830779 (5th Cir. Apr. 19,

2004) (unpublished). While the case was on limited remand in the

district court, Williams filed a motion to recuse the district
2

court judge, which motion was denied. Williams’s appeal from the

denial of the recusal motion was docketed in this court as a

separate appeal from his appeal of his conviction and sentence.

Assuming the denial of the recusal motion is properly before us, we

perceive no abuse of discretion in the district court’s denial of

that motion. 

Williams argues that comments made by the district judge

during a sentencing hearing in a related criminal proceeding

demonstrated personal bias or prejudice toward Williams. He also

argues that recusal was warranted because the district court

unsealed his sentencing transcript for purposes of a state

forfeiture proceeding without giving him an opportunity to respond

to the motion to unseal and without requiring the government to

comply with a local rule.

We review a district court’s denial of a 28 U.S.C. § 455(a)

motion for recusal for abuse of discretion. United States v.

Jordan, 49 F.3d 152, 156 (5th Cir. 1995). Recusal should occur if

a reasonable person with knowledge of all the circumstances would

harbor doubts about the judge’s impartiality. United States v.

Anderson, 160 F.3d 231, 233 (5th Cir. 1998). The general rule is

that, to be disqualifying, bias or prejudice must stem from an

“extrajudicial source.” Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S. 540, 555

(1994). 

As our review of the entire context of the judicial

proceedings in which the events challenged in this case arose
3

reveals no disqualifying judicial bias, we conclude that there was

no abuse of discretion in the district court’s denial of Williams’s

recusal motion. See Andrade v. Chojnacki, 338 F.3d 448, 454-55

(5th Cir. 2003). Even if he had shown an abuse of discretion, any

error would be harmless. See Patterson v. Mobil Oil Corp., 335

F.3d 476, 485 (5th Cir. 2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1108 (2004).

AFFIRMED.
### §8724. Zoning regulations and maps

(a) Amendments of Zoning Regulations and Maps.—The National Capital Planning Commission may make a report and recommendation to the Zoning Commission of the District of Columbia, as provided in section 5 of the Act of June 20, 1938 (ch. 534, 52 Stat. 798), on the relation, conformity, or consistency of proposed amendments of the zoning regulations and maps with the comprehensive plan for the National Capital. The Planning Commission may also submit to the Zoning Commission proposed amendments or general revisions to the zoning regulations or the zoning map for the District of Columbia.

(b) Additional Report by Planning Commission.—When requested by an authorized representative of the Planning Commission, the Zoning Commission may recess for a reasonable period of time any public hearing it is holding to consider a proposed amendment to the zoning regulations or map so that the Planning Commission may have an opportunity to present to the Zoning Commission an additional report on the proposed amendment.

(c) Zoning Committee of National Capital Planning Commission.—

(1) Establishment and composition.—There is a Zoning Committee of the National Capital Planning Commission. The Committee consists of at least three members of the Planning Commission the Planning Commission designates for that purpose. The number of members serving on the Committee may vary.

(2) Duties.—The Committee shall carry out the functions vested in the Planning Commission under this section and section 8725 of this title—

(A) to the extent the Planning Commission decides; and

(B) when requested by the Zoning Commission and approved by the Planning Commission.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1223.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8724(a) | 40:71g(a). | June 6, 1924, ch. 270, §8(a)–(c), as added July 19, 1952, ch. 949, §1, 66 Stat. 790; Pub. L. 93–198, title II, §203(g), Dec. 24, 1973, 87 Stat. 783. |
| 8724(b) | 40:71g(b). | |
| 8724(c) | 40:71g(c). | |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "Act of June 20, 1938" are substituted for "Act of March 1, 1920" to correct an error in the law.

In subsection (b), the words "properly", "at its discretion", and "or its representative" are omitted as unnecessary.

In subsection (c)(1), the words "from time to time" are omitted as unnecessary.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 5 of the Act of June 20, 1938, referred to in subsec. (a), is section 5 of act June 20, 1938, ch. 534, 52 Stat. 798, which is not classified to the Code.
### [§11704. Renumbered §11703]
#### § 1.120 Purpose.

This subpart establishes procedures for the Commission's referral of past-due legally enforceable debts to the Department of the Treasury's Bureau of the Fiscal Service (Fiscal Service) for offset against the tax refund payments of the debtor, consistent with applicable Fiscal Service regulations and definitions set forth in 31 CFR 285.2 and 285.5.
### SUBCHAPTER II—PLANNING AGENCIES
#### § 970.404 Adequate exploration plan.

Before he may certify an application, the Administrator must find that the proposed exploration plan of the applicant meets the requirements of § 970.203.
APPROVED BY OMB: NO. 3150-0164 Estimated burden per response to comply with this information collection request: 45 minutes. This uniform manifest is required by NRC to meet reporting requirements of Federal and State Agencies for the safe transportation and disposal of low-level waste. 

Send comments regarding burden estimate to the FOIA, Library, and Information Collections Branch (T-6 A10M), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, or by email to Infocollects.Resource@nrc.gov, and the OMB reviewer at: OMB 

Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, (3150-0164), Attn: Desk Officer for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 725 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20503; email: oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is 

not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the document requesting or requiring the collection displays a currently valid OMB control number.

NRC FORM 540A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

UNIFORM LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE 

WASTE MANIFEST SHIPPING PAPER (Continuation)

See NUREG/BR-0204 for detailed instructions for completing this form: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/brochures/br0204/

8. Manifest Number 

 (Use this number on all continuation pages)

11. U. S. Department of Transportation Description 

 (Including UN ID number, proper shipping name, 

 hazard class, and any additional information)

 12. DOT 

 Labels

 13. Transport 

 Index 14. Physical and Chemical Form 15. Individual Radionuclides 16. Maximum Package  Activity in SI Units

17. Total Weight 

 or Volume 

(Use appropriate units)

18. Identification 

 Number of 

Package

NRC FORM 540A (04-26-2023)

(04-26-2023)

Page Of Page(s)
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**








In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Superior Oil and Gas Co.
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the
“Report”), I, Daniel Lloyd, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
      certify that to my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78o(d)); and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      August 13, 2007


*/s/
                Daniel Lloyd*Daniel
                LloydChief
                Financial Officer





The
      above
      certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB
      or as a separate disclosure document.




Exhibit
        32.1
### Part D—Schools and Nonprofits
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA S upreme C ourt C ause N o. DA 21 - 0237 PHILIP R. WIRTH ,

Appellant , v. LEWIS & CLARK COUNTY AND BRIDGE CREEK ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION ,

Appellees . **GRANT OF**  **EXTENSION**

Appellee Lewis & Clark County has requested a 30 - day extension from September 27, 2021, up to and including October 27, 2021, to file its Response Brief in this matter. Good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee Lewis & Clark County shall hav e until and including October 27, 2021, within which to file its Response Brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court September 20 2021

09/20/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0237
### SUBCHAPTER XI—HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATIONS
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 14, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41810

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

WILSON LOCKE LYNCH, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:05-CR-69

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Wilson Locke Lynch, Jr.,

has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required

by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Lynch has not

responded. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s

brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused

from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jefferson Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 14, 2004 |  | /s/    Anderson L. Smith             
|                   |  | Anderson L. Smith                    
|                   |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



|                   |  |                                                 
|------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 14, 2004 |  | /s/    Jane P. Hutton                           
|                   |  | Jane P. Hutton                                  
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Stephen N. Ananias, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Mindspeed Technologies, Inc.; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: June 29, 2012



/s/ STEPHEN N. ANANIASStephen N. AnaniasSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




6
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 224 (Monday, November 22, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 67943]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25860]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Consortium for Advanced Manufacturing-
International

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 16, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Consortium for Advanced 
Manufacturing-International (``CAM-I'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of 
the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of 
its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for 
the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: Consortium 
for Advanced Manufacturing-International, Fort Worth, TX. The nature 
and scope of CAM-I's standards development activities are: To focus on 
information preparation for computer aided/integrated manufacturing 
systems and methods related to standards software input/output, 
interfaces, and language specifications.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-25860 Filed 11-19-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
### Division J—Miscellaneous
Seismic Velocities from High-Resolution Surface-Seismic Imaging at Six ANSS Sites near Memphis, Tennessee

*By***Robert A. Williams, William J. Stephenson, Jack K. Odum, *and* David M. Worley**

**U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 03-218**

 

**Version 1.0**
Several universities in the central United States, including the University ofMemphis and St. Louis University, have recently collaborated in the installationof about thirty seismographs as part of the Advanced National Seismic System(ANSS). To better understand ground motions recorded at six of these sites, thisreport describes *P-*and *S-*wave velocities (*Vp* and *Vs*) in the upper 30 to 60 mmeasured using seismic refraction/reflection methods on the ground surface inMemphis, Arkansas, and western Tennessee.OFR-03-218 HTML file(This version of the report is accessible as defined in Section 508.)AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices
U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey      URL: https://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/of/2003/ofr-03-218/Questions or Assistance: USGS Web ContactPage Last Modified: Sat Jan 12 23:04 EDT 2013
### SUBCHAPTER IV—CONTINUATION, SUPPORT, AND EVOLUTION OF THE INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION
### SUBCHAPTER IV—HOUSING ASSISTANCE

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 101–625, title VIII, §§821, 823, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4331, 4355, which provided for the amendment of this subchapter generally and provided for implementation, transition, and a prospective effective date for the amendment, was repealed by Pub. L. 102–550, title XIV, §1410, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4038, which provided that: "The Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act is amended by striking sections 821 and 823 (42 U.S.C. 11361 note). The amendment made by such section 821 of such Act shall not take effect."
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 28, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00428

- CR

The STATE of Texas

, Appellant

v.

Raymond SOTO, Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR9019 The Honorable Velia J. Meza, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

In its notices of appeal, the State requested a stay pursuant to article 44.01(e) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. The request is GRANTED, and all proceedings in the underlying

causes are STAYED pending final disposition of this appeal. T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC

. art. 44.01(e).

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 28th day of June, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
### SUBCHAPTER III—FOLLOW THROUGH PROGRAMS