alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §11502. Evaluation criteria and plans

(a) Measurable Test Criteria.—To the maximum extent practicable, the head of each executive agency conducting the pilot program under section 11501 of this title shall establish measurable criteria for evaluating the effects of the procedures or techniques to be tested under the program.

(b) Test Plan.—Before the pilot program may be conducted under section 11501 of this title, the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy shall submit to Congress a detailed test plan for the program, including a detailed description of the procedures to be used and a list of regulations that are to be waived.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1246; Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title VIII, §825(b)(2)(B)(i), (ii), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2616; Pub. L. 107–347, title II, §210(h)(2)(B)(i), (ii), Dec. 17, 2002, 116 Stat. 2938.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 11502 | 40:1472. | Pub. L. 104–106, div. E, title LIII, §5302, Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 691. |

Section

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2002—Pub. L. 107–314 and Pub. L. 107–347 amended section identically, substituting "the pilot" for "a pilot" in subsecs. (a) and (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2002 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 107–347 effective 120 days after Dec. 17, 2002, see section 402(a) of Pub. L. 107–347, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3601 of Title 44, Public Printing and Documents.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 20, 2009

l0317 

# Order

March 20, 2009

136926 & (65)

DANIEL HOWE, Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Appellee,

v SC: 136926 COA: 273949 Genesee CC: 2002-073710-NH MICHAEL BOUCREE and FLINT NEUROSCIENCE CENTER, Defendants,

and

BHADRABALA B. GANATRA, M.D., individually and d/b/a BHADRABALA B. GANATRA, M.D., P.C., Defendants-Appellees and Cross-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 10, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as crossappellants are considered. Leav e to appeal is DENIED in re lation to the judgment of the Court of Appeals orderi ng a new trial because of misconduc t by the plaintiff’s attorney. As stated by the panel, the reso lution of this issue renders the other appellate issues moot. Accordingly, we VACATE the remainder of the Court of Appeals judgment. The application for leave to appeal as cross-appellants is DENIED.

K ELLY , C.J., would grant leave to appeal.
From: Steven Blankenbeker < s_blankenbeker@yahoo.com >

Sent: 08/14/2008 01:18 PM To: Jeff Telander/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Subject: EPA Brick Info Jeff, I am attaching to this email the electronic version of the survey form. I tried to get as much information on this as I could. Much of the work on the first scrubber was done by the engineer before me so I had little to work with. The wet scrubber is only a few years old. I was able to get our owner to let me share all of this info, so I didn't try to classify anything as confidential this time. Call (704)636

- 2411 or email if you have any questions. Thanks, Steve Blankenbeker Engineer Taylor Clay Products (See attached file: Brick ICR 6

-4

- 08.xls)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT 

SYSTEM

v.

CROSS PETITION OF: PENNSYLVANIA 

STATE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION,

Intervenor

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 344 MAL 2015

Cross Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Published Opinion and Order

of the Commonwealth Court at Nos. 207 

CD 2014 and 293 CD 2014, at 113 A.3d 

9 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2015) entered on March 

20, 2015, affirming, reversing and 

remanding the Order Dated of the 

Office of Open Records at No. AP 2013-

1830 entered on January 31, 2014

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 17th day of January, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is GRANTED, the order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED, and the matter is 

REMANDED for proceedings consistent with Pennsylvania State Education Ass’n v. 

Dep’t of Community and Economic Development, 148 A.3d 142 (Pa. 2016). 

PENNSYLVANIANS FOR UNION 

REFORM DECIDED: JANUARY 17, 2017
Editorial Note on Part 922
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

§ 922.154 Consultation with the State of Washington, affected Indian tribes, and adjacent county governments. ( a ) The Director shall regularly consult with the State of Washington, the governing bodies of tribes with reservations adjacent to the Sanctuary, and adjacent county governments regarding areas of mutual concern, including Sanctuary programs, permitting, activities, development, and threats to Sanctuary resources.
( b ) The Director shall, when requested by such governments, enter into a memorandum of understanding regarding such consultations.
### **CHAPTER 2—ORGANIZATION**

Sec.
201.
United States Postal Service.
202.
Board of Governors.
203.
Postmaster General; Deputy Postmaster General.
204.
General Counsel; Judicial Officer; Chief Postal Inspector.
205.
Procedures of the Board of Governors.
206.
Advisory Council.
207.
Seal.
208.
Reservation of powers.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1996**—Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, §101(f) [title VI, §662(f)(2)(B)], Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–314, 3009–383, in item 204 substituted "General Counsel; Judicial Officer; Chief Postal Inspector" for "Assistant Postmasters General; General Counsel; Judicial Officer".
### §6303. Certain contracts limited to appropriated amounts

A contract to erect, repair, or furnish a public building, or to make any public improvement, shall not be made on terms requiring the Federal Government to pay more than the amount specifically appropriated for the activity covered by the contract.

(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3804.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6303 | 41:12. | R.S. §3733. |

Section

The words "the activity covered by the contract" are substituted for "the specific purpose" for clarity.
§ 2015.2 Definitions. For the purpose of this subpart, the following terms shall have the following meanings: ( a ) *In-quota sugar-containing products* means any article classified under any of the subheadings of the HTS specified in additional U.S. note 8 to chapter 17 of the HTS that is entered under the in-quota rate of duty.
( b ) *Allocated country* means a country to which an allocation of a particular quantity of sugar-containing products has been assigned.
( c ) Enter or Entered means to enter, or withdraw from warehouse, for consumption.
( d ) *HTS* means the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States.
( e ) *Participating Country* means any allocated country that USTR has determined is, and has notified the U.S. Customs Service as being, eligible to use export certificates.
( f ) *USTR* means the United States Trade Representative or the designee of the United States Trade Representative.
BISNIS Trades & Tenders, April 5, 1999 -- Part 2

----
##### 



Exhibit 10.37
   
    Granted To:
    
    Clyde A. Heintzelman(the Employee for Incentive Stock Options, or the Optionee for Non-Qualified Stock Options)Grant Date:
    
    August 9, 2005Granted:
    
    3,704Grant Price:
    
    $0.0000The close of business on the business day immediately preceding:Vesting Schedule:
    
    Board Restricted Stock1,852 on 02/09/20061,852 on 08/09/2006
  ooSignature:
    
    /s/ Clyde A. Heintzelman
 o
 Note: If there are any discrepancies in the name or address shown above,
please make the appropriate corrections on this form.
### SUBCHAPTER II—UNITED STATES INTERAGENCY COUNCIL ON HOMELESSNESS

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 108–199, div. G, title II, §216(3), Jan. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 394, substituted "UNITED STATES INTERAGENCY COUNCIL ON HOMELESSNESS" for "INTERAGENCY COUNCIL ON THE HOMELESS" in subchapter heading.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Brent M. Boyles, certify that:

1.               Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Maine &Maritimes Corporation (the registrant);

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a)                                      designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)                                     evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation;

c)                                      disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors:

a)                                      allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)                                     anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves Management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Dated: August 10, 2007                 |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                   |
| /s/ Brent M.  Boyles                   |   |
| Brent M. Boyles                        |
| President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7857
DEE DEIDRE FARMER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-96-699-H) Submitted: July 10, 1997 Decided: July 22, 1997 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dee Deidre Farmer, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the recordand the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Farmer v. North Carolina State Bar , No. CA-96-699-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 22, 1996). Appellant's motion for injunction is denied. We dispensewith oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 73 
          - [DA 04-3446; MB Docket No. 04-194, RM-10729] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Proposed rule; dismissal. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Audio Division dismisses a Petition for Rule Making filed by Jacor Broadcasting of Colorado, Inc., requesting the allotment of Channel 261C2 to Creede, Colorado, as its first local service.                         *See*67 FR 69703, November 19, 2002. Jacor Broadcasting of Colorado, Inc., or no other party, filed comments in support of the allotment of Channel 261C2 to Creede, Colorado. It is the Commission's policy to refrain from making a new allotment to a community absent an expression of interest.                     

# ADDRESSES:

Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. 

      ( print page 67297)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Rolanda F. Smith, Media Bureau, (202) 418-2180. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    This is a synopsis of the Commission's Report and Order, MB Docket No. 04-194, adopted October 27, 2004, and released October 29, 2004. The full text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC's Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 Twelfth Street, SW., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20054, telephone 1-800-378-3160 or                     *http:www.BCPIWEB.com.*                     This document is not subject to the Congressional Review Act. (The Commission is, therefore, not required to submit a copy of this Report and Order to GAO, pursuant to the Congressional Review Act,                     *see*5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) because the proposed rule was dismissed.)                 

Federal Communications Commission. 

John A. Karousos,

Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau. 

[FR Doc. 04-25510 Filed 11-16-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
LETTER FROM THE U.S. OMBUDSMAN

----

**September 1997**
My work on behalf of U.S. companies as U.S. Ombudsman for Energy and CommercialCooperation with the New Independent States continues this year on a number offronts--especially in the Russian Far East--and I would like to bring you up-to-date on itsprogress.  AsU.S. Ombudsman, my principal responsibilities are to promote priority energy and commercialprojects in the NIS countries, advocate for U.S. companies pursuing such projects, and encourageNIS governments to create business-friendly environments for U.S. firms doing business in theircountries.  To do this, I work closely with the White House, the Departments of Commerce,Energy, and State, and other federal agencies.  In addition to direct trade promotionresponsibilities, my office is deeply involved in coordinating the activities of the U.S.-RussianGore Chernomyrdin Commission and its counterparts in Ukraine and Kazakstan, the Gore- Kuchma and Gore Nazarbayev Commissions.
**In Russian Regions: Private Sector Participation**
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 09-003 January 8, 2009

NRC ANNOUNCES OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN HEARING ON 

NEW NUCLEAR REACTOR APPLICATION FOR FERMI SITE 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission today announced the opportunity to participate 

in the hearing on a Combined License (COL) application for a new nuclear reactor at the 

Fermi site in Michigan. 

Detroit Edison submitted its application Sept. 18, 2008, seeking a license to build and 

operate an Economic Simplified Boiling Water Reactor (ESBWR) at the site, approximately 

25 miles northeast of Toledo, Ohio. The application (minus proprietary and security-related 

details), is available on the NRC Web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/newreactors/col/fermi.html. 

 On Nov. 25, 2008, the NRC staff determined that the application contains sufficient 

information for the agency to formally “docket,” or file, the application and begin its 

technical review. Docketing the application does not preclude additional requests for 

information as the review proceeds; nor does it indicate whether the Commission will issue 

the license. The docket number established for this application is 52-033. 

 The NRC has issued in the Federal Register a notice of opportunity to intervene in 

the proceeding on the application, and the deadline for requesting a hearing is March 9. 

Petitions may be filed by anyone whose interest may be affected by the proposed license, 

who wishes to participate as a party in the proceeding, and who meets the criteria set out in 

the NRC’s regulations (10 CFR Part 2). NRC staff provided background information 

regarding the hearing process during an August 2008 outreach meeting held in Monroe, 

Mich. 

 A petition to intervene must be electronically submitted in a timely manner to the 

NRC's Electronic Information Exchange (EIE) system. The petition to intervene must be 

filed in accordance with the NRC's E-Filing Rule that appeared in the Federal Register on 

Aug. 28, 2007. Additional guidance and instructions regarding electronic submissions to the 

NRC EIE system is available on the NRC Web pages at: http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html. 
 Detailed information about the new reactor licensing process can be found on the 

NRC Web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors.html. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a 

SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web 

site.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the annual report of BidGive International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Thomas W. Richardson, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Thomas W. Richardson

Thomas W. Richardson

Chief Financial Officer

Date:  August 6, 2004
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 12.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

      I, Ted Sun, Acting Chief Executive Officer of NetEase.com, Inc., certify
that:

      1. I have reviewed this amendment no. 1 to annual report on Form 20-F/A of
NetEase.com, Inc.; and

      2. Based on my knowledge, this amendment no. 1 to annual report on Form
20-F/A does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this amendment no. 1 to annual report on Form 20-F/A.

Dated: December 29, 2003


By:  /s/ Ted Sun
    ----------------------------------
     Ted Sun
     Acting Chief Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Part 922
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

§ 922.184 Prohibited activities. ( a ) The following activities are prohibited and thus unlawful for any person to conduct or cause to be conducted. ( 1 ) Approaching, or causing a vessel or other object to approach, within the Sanctuary, by any means, within 100 yards of any humpback whale except as authorized under the Marine Mammal Protection Act, as amended (MMPA), 16 U.S.C. 1361 *et seq.,* and the Endangered Species Act, as amended (ESA), 16 U.S.C. 1531 *et seq.;*
( 2 ) Operating any aircraft above the Sanctuary within 1,000 feet of any humpback whale except as necessary for takeoff or landing from an airport or runway, or as authorized under the MMPA and the ESA;
( 3 ) Taking any humpback whale in the Sanctuary except as authorized under the MMPA and the ESA;
( 4 ) Possessing within the Sanctuary (regardless of where taken) any living or dead humpback whale or part thereof taken in violation of the MMPA or the ESA;
( 5 ) Discharging or depositing any material or other matter in the Sanctuary; altering the seabed of the Sanctuary; or discharging or depositing any material or other matter outside the Sanctuary if the discharge or deposit subsequently enters and injures a humpback whale or humpback whale habitat, provided that such activity: ( i ) Requires a Federal or State permit, license, lease, or other authorization; and
( ii ) Is conducted: ( A ) Without such permit, license, lease, or other authorization, or
( B ) not in compliance with the terms or conditions of such permit, license, lease, or other authorization.
( 6 ) Interfering with, obstructing, delaying or preventing an investigation, search, seizure or disposition of seized property in connection with enforcement of either of the Acts or any regulations issued under either of the Acts.
( b ) The prohibitions in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(5) of this § 922.184 do not apply to activities necessary to respond to emergencies threatening life, property or the environment; or to activities necessary for valid law enforcement purposes. However, while such activities are not subject to paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(5) of this § 922.184, this paragraph (b) does not exempt the activity from the underlying prohibition or restriction under other applicable laws and regulations (e.g., MMPA, ESA, and CWA).
( c ) Any Sanctuary fishery regulations shall not take effect in Hawaii State waters until established by the State Board of Land and Natural Resources.