alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NAMES NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR AT PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has selected Jim Nance as the new resident 

inspector at the Perry Nuclear Power Plant in Perry, Ohio. The nuclear 

power facility is operated by First Energy Nuclear Operating Company.

Each commercial nuclear power plant site in the United States 

has at least two resident inspectors who monitor day-to-day operations 

at the plant. Nance joins Senior NRC Resident Inspector Mark 

Marshfield at the Perry facility.

Nance came to the NRC Region III as a reactor engineer in 

January 2011. Since joining the agency, he has completed a rigorous 

inspector qualification program and has participated in engineering 

inspections throughout the Midwest region. Most recently, Nance 

completed several assignments at the Braidwood and Byron nuclear power generating stations in 

Illinois.

“Nance’s background, training, and experience will assist the NRC in carrying out its 

mission of protecting people and the environment and ensuring the safe operation of nuclear power 

plants,” said Cynthia Pederson, Acting Regional Administrator for NRC Region III.

Nance graduated from the United States Naval Academy in 1980 and then served as a 

nuclear qualified officer aboard the USS Richard B. Russell (SSN-687), before leaving military 

service. Prior to joining the NRC, he served as an Examiner for the Malcolm Baldrige National 

Quality Award and as a partner in a consulting firm focused on Quality Management and Cultural 

Engineering.

The resident inspectors have an office at the Perry plant and can be reached by telephone at 

440/259-3610.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES link 

on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to 

NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region III

2443 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532

Site: www.nrc.gov Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. III-12-016

Contact: Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662

 Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663

April 25, 2012

E-Mail: OPA3 @nrc.gov
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 10542 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
MICHAEL WILLIAM GORDON , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:12

- CR

- 93

- 5

Before PRADO, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Michael William Gordon has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gordon h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 16, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-10542 Document: 00512597809 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/16/2014No. 13

- 10542

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion fo r leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-10542 Document: 00512597809 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/16/2014
No. IV-12-003

Contact: Victor Dricks (817) 200-1128

 Lara Uselding (817) 200-1519

 

January 9, 2012

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

NRC PROPOSES $140,000 CIVIL PENALTY FOR RIVER BEND NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has proposed a $140,000 civil penalty against 

Entergy Operations, Inc. at the River Bend Station, for control room operators accessing the 

internet without authorization and failure by the utility to take timely corrective actions once 

the issue was identified. River Bend is located 24 miles northwest of Baton Rouge.

Control room operators are directly responsible for monitoring the reactor and other 

important plant systems to ensure that it is operated safely. Plant procedures require operators to 

remain attentive and focused on their work. 

Between January and April 2010, nine operators deliberately violated those procedures 

and accessed the internet from the plant’s control room while on duty. Three of the nine did so 

with such frequency and duration that they are being issued severity level III enforcement 

violations. The remaining six operators will receive severity level IV violations. The websites 

visited included news, sports, fishing and retirement account sites. The plant will receive a 

severity level III violation and a fine double the base civil penalty of $70,000. Severity level I 

represents the greatest significance and Severity level IV is the lowest level. 

“NRC relies on a good faith effort to comply with regulatory requirements. This action 

reflects the significance of the violation due to the number of people involved and the willful 

nature of their actions,” said Region IV Administrator Elmo E. Collins. “While the licensee 

has since taken steps to correct the problem and ensure it doesn’t happen again, they did not 

promptly address the larger safety culture issue.”

The NRC resident inspectors were notified of the issue and NRC launched an 

investigation in July 2010. On Nov. 21, 2011, Entergy officials met with NRC at a pre-decisional 

enforcement conference to discuss their corrective actions. Based on all the information 

gathered, NRC has determined that the licensee did not take prompt corrective actions to 

effectively address the larger safety culture issues raised by the operators’ actions.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV

 1600 E. Lamar Blvd.

 Arlington, TX 76011-4511

Telephone: (817) 860-8100

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov
###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.
### Part A—Establishment of Systems
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;
 (b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
 (c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report,
based on our evaluation; and
 (d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Linda H. SimmonsLinda H. SimmonsChief Financial Officer
and Treasurer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Page 8 of 19


                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(a)

                        KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 1999-B

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE


Bank One, National Association             Banker's Trust Company
One Bank One Plaza, Suite 0126             Four Albany Street
Chicago, IL 60670                          New York, New York 10006
ATTN: Corporate Trust Administration       ATTN: Corporate Trust & Agency Group
Phone:  (312) 407-0192                       Structured Finance
Fax:    (312) 407-1708                     Phone:  (212) 250-6501
                                           Fax:    (212) 250-6349

Key Bank USA, National Association
800 Superior Ave, 4th Floor
Cleveland, OH  44114
ATTN: Senior Vice President
Key Education Resources
Phone:  (216) 828-9342
Fax:    (216) 828-9301


Pursuant to Section 4.09 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement among Key Bank USA,
National Association, as Seller, Master Servicer and Administrator, Key Corp
Student Loan Trust 1999-B, and Bank One, National Association, as Eligible
Lender Trustee, dated as of September 1, 1999 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned
hereby certifies that (i) a review of the activities of the Master Servicer from
January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2000, and of its performance under the
Agreement has been made, and (ii) to the best of our knowledge, based on our
review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the
Agreement throughout such period.

                                     Key Bank USA, National Association,
                                     as Master Servicer


Date: March 29, 2000                 By:   /s/ Randall M. Behm
                                        ----------------------------------
                                     Name:  Randall M. Behm
                                     Title: Senior Vice President

                                     By:   /s/ Darlene H. Dimitrijevs
                                        ----------------------------------
                                     Name:  Darlene H. Dimitrijevs, CPA
                                     Title: Senior Vice President
Order entered September 14, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05
- 20
- 00699
- CV IN THE INTEREST OF C .B., ET AL., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 305th Judicial District C ourt Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. JC
- 18
- 00992
- X ORDER Although ordered to file the reporter’s record in this parental termination case no later than September 8, 2020, court reporter Pamela Sumler has failed to comply

. Accordingly, we ORDE R Ms. Sumler , Official Court Reporter for the 305th Judicial District Court, to file the reporter’s record no later than September 21, 2020

. To ensure the record is filed as ordered, the trial court must arrange a substitute reporter if necessary. See T E X
. R. A PP
. P. 28.4(b)(1). We caution that, should the record not be filed by September 21st , an order that Ms. Sumler not sit as a reporter until she complies may issue.We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to the Honorable Cher yl Lee Shannon, Presiding Judge of the 305 th Judicial District Court; Ms. Sumler; and, the parties. /s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
§ 8a.110 Remedial and affirmative action and self-evaluation. ( a ) *Remedial action.* If the designated agency official finds that a recipient has discriminated against persons on the basis of sex in an education program or activity, such recipient shall take such remedial action as the designated agency official deems necessary to overcome the effects of such discrimination.
( b ) *Affirmative action.* In the absence of a finding of discrimination on the basis of sex in an education program or activity, a recipient may take affirmative action consistent with law to overcome the effects of conditions that resulted in limited participation therein by persons of a particular sex. Nothing in these Title IX regulations shall be interpreted to alter any affirmative action obligations that a recipient may have under Executive Order 11246, 3 CFR, 1964-1965 Comp., p. 339; as amended by Executive Order 11375, 3 CFR, 1966-1970 Comp., p. 684; as amended by Executive Order 11478, 3 CFR, 1966-1970 Comp., p. 803; as amended by Executive Order 12086, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 230; as amended by Executive Order 12107, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 264.
( c ) *Self-evaluation.* Each recipient education institution shall, within one year of September 29, 2000: ( 1 ) Evaluate, in terms of the requirements of these Title IX regulations, its current policies and practices and the effects thereof concerning admission of students, treatment of students, and employment of both academic and non-academic personnel working in connection with the recipient's education program or activity;
( 2 ) Modify any of these policies and practices that do not or may not meet the requirements of these Title IX regulations; and
( 3 ) Take appropriate remedial steps to eliminate the effects of any discrimination that resulted or may have resulted from adherence to these policies and practices.
( d ) *Availability of self-evaluation and related materials.* Recipients shall maintain on file for at least three years following completion of the evaluation required under paragraph (c) of this section, and shall provide to the designated agency official upon request, a description of any modifications made pursuant to paragraph (c)(2) of this section and of any remedial steps taken pursuant to paragraph (c)(3) of this section.
#### Kirsten E. Westphal, Respondent, v Greyhound Lines, Inc., et al., Appellants.

[820 NYS2d 613]

In an action to recover damages for wrongful death, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Grays, J.), *430dated June 15, 2005, which granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability and denied, as academic, their cross motion for an open commission to take a nonparty deposition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The evidence submitted by the plaintiff established a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of the defendants’ liability *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 325 [1986]). Any minor inconsistencies in the testimony of the plaintiff’s witnesses were insufficient in this case to raise a bona fide issue as to their credibility *(see Coughlin v Bartnick,*293 AD2d 509 [2002]).

The defendants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Luciano and Covello, JJ., concur.
| **Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves (Narrative) (Details) (USD $)In Millions, unless otherwise specified** | 3 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|----------------|
||
| Catastrophe losses net of reinsurance                                                                                | $ 68           | $ 100          | $ 96 | $ 155 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Catastrophe losses net of reinsurance
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**cna_CatastropheLossesNetOfReinsurance**Namespace Prefix:**cna_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**debit**Period Type:**duration |
§ 930.123 Definitions. ( a ) The “appellant” is the applicant, person or applicant agency submitting an appeal to the Secretary pursuant to this subpart.
( b ) For the purposes of this subpart, the “Federal agency” is the agency whose proposed issuance of a license or permit or grant of assistance is the subject of the appeal to the Secretary.
( c ) The term “energy project” means projects related to the siting, construction, expansion, or operation of any facility designed to explore, develop, produce, transmit or transport energy or energy resources that are subject to review by a coastal State under subparts D, E, F or I of this part.
( d ) The term “consolidated record” means the record of all decisions made or actions taken by the lead Federal permitting agency or by another Federal or State administrative agency or officer, maintained by the lead Federal permitting agency, with the cooperation of Federal and State administrative agencies, related to any federal authorization for the permitting, approval or other authorization of an energy project.
( e ) The term “lead Federal permitting agency” means the Federal agency required to: issue a federal license or permit under subparts D or I of this part; approve an OCS plan under subpart E of this part; or provide federal financial assistance under subparts F or I of this part for an energy project.
[65 FR 77154, Dec. 8, 2000, as amended at 71 FR 829, Jan. 5, 2006]
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2524

To redesignate the Federal building located at 935 Pennsylvania Avenue 

Northwest in the District of Columbia as the ‘‘Federal Bureau of Investigation Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 19, 2003

Mr. BURTON of Indiana (for himself, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. LATOURETTE, Mr. 

DELAHUNT, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida, Mr. 

LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. WATT, Mr. 

TIERNEY, Ms. WATSON, and Mr. CONYERS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To redesignate the Federal building located at 935 Pennsylvania Avenue Northwest in the District of Columbia as 

the ‘‘Federal Bureau of Investigation Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION. 

4 The Federal building located at 935 Pennsylvania 

5 Avenue Northwest in the District of Columbia, commonly 

6 known as the J. Edgar Hoover Federal Building, shall be 
2

•HR 2524 IH 

1 known and designated as the ‘‘Federal Bureau of Inves2 tigation Building’’. 

3 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

4 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

5 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal 

6 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be 

7 a reference to the ‘‘Federal Bureau of Investigation Build8 ing’’.

Æ
12/13/2011 15:48 FAX 2024935U2 PAA 406541.4101 

12002/002 

p.2 

Reep 

Bella 

Laird ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

^•| D:::'::f3ior,i\^ c:0''po'"?.-ion 

•^•FPAniMENT OF 

:;:jKrT OPERATIONS 

m\ G[C 13 P ' 3: 5^-^ 

Noveirber30, 2011 

\TA FACSIMILE 

202-366-7536 

The Xonorabk Richard C. Goodwin 

Administraiivc Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of I'ransponalion 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Id the Matter of Armorcoat USA, LLC 

FDMS No. rAA-20U-O78l 

Dear Jud^e Goodwin: 

I am counsel for Annorcoat USA, LLC I have spoken with counsel for the FAA, Kyle 

Lomiizo'\v. concerning scheduling of this hearing. While we will, of course, work diligently to 

try to resolve this matter short of trial, I wanted to advise the court that I will be out of my office 

on a preMovisiy scheduled vacation from Februai"y 2 ^ to February 24' \ Because prep time will 

be necessary in the event oftrial. 1 would ask the court's indulgence in nor scheduling this matter 

during the mouth of February, 2012 if the hearing date of January 6"'^ cannot be met. Vour 

con:jiderarion is appreciated. I have spoken to Mr. Lomazow about tliis concern iO this letter and 

comincntaiy will rot be a surprise to him. 

Very sincerely, 

REEP,-BELLa UMRD. P,C. 

Richard A. Reep 

RAK^sld 

cc: Hearing Docket Clerk, Federal A\iation Administraiion (via facsimile at 202-493-5020) 

Kyle E. Lomazow (via facsimile at 425-227O007) 

J. Grajix Lincoln 

John Rvan
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 222 (Thursday, November 18, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 67625]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25610]



[[Page 67625]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board


Release of Waybill Data

    The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from Mayer, 
Brown, Rowe & Maw on behalf of The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe 
Railway Company (BNSF) (WB461-11--10/20/2004) for permission to use 
certain data from the Board's Carload Waybill Samples. A copy of this 
request may be obtained from the Office of Economics, Environmental 
Analysis, and Administration.
    The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; 
therefore, if any parties object to these requests, they should file 
their objections with the Director of the Board's Office of Economics, 
Environmental Analysis, and Administration within 14 calendar days of 
the date of this notice. The rules for release of waybill data are 
codified at 49 CFR 1244.9.
    Contact: Mac Frampton, (202) 565-1541.

Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04-25610 Filed 11-17-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
### SUBCHAPTER I—PROGRAMS
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Unico, Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended February 28, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I Mark A. Lopez, Chief Executive Officer of Unico, Incorporated (the "Company"), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, was adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|                      |                                                             |
|----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated: June 15, 2009 | */s/ Mark A. Lopez*

Mark A. Lopez

Chief Executive Officer |
|                 |                                                        |