alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
 CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 
 In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Barola Oil
& Gas Co. Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, I certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:
 
 (1)
    the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Barola Oil & Gas Co. Inc. for the
      quarter ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
    the
      information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
      quarter ended March 31, 2005, fairly presents in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of Barola Oil & Gas
      Co. Inc.
 
 By:
    /s/
      Henry
      StarekName:
    Henry
      StarekTitle:
    Principal
      Executive Officer,
      Principal
      Financial Officer and DirectorDate:
    May
      13, 2005
§ 923.93 Eligible implementation costs. ( a ) Costs claimed must be beneficial and necessary to the objectives of the grant project. As used herein the terms cost and grant project pertain to both the Federal and the matching share. Allowability of costs will be determined in accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular A-87: Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian Tribal Governments.
( b ) Federal funds awarded pursuant to section 306 of the Act may not be used for land acquisition purposes and may not be used for construction purposes. These costs may be eligible, however, pursuant to section 306A of the Act.
( c ) The primary purpose for which implementation funds, pursuant to section 306 of the Act, are to be used is to assure effective implementation and administration of the management program, including especially administrative actions to implement enforceable program policies, authorities and other management techniques. Implementation activities should focus on achieving the policies of the Act.
( d ) Section 306 funding in support of any of these purposes may be used to fund, among other things: ( 1 ) Personnel costs,
( 2 ) Supplies and overhead,
( 3 ) Equipment, and
( 4 ) Feasibility studies and preliminary engineering reports.
( e ) States are encouraged to coordinate administrative funding requests with funding possibilities pursuant to sections 306A, 308, 309, 310 and 315 of the Act, as well as with funding possibilities pursuant to section 6217 of the Coastal Zone Act Reauthorization Amendments of 1990. When in doubt as to the appropriate section of the Act under which to request funding, States should consult with OCRM. States should consult with OCRM on technical aspects of consolidating requests into a single application.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2410 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2410

   To prohibit the importation for sale of foreign-made flags of the 
                       United States of America.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 10, 2003

Mr. Strickland introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit the importation for sale of foreign-made flags of the 
                       United States of America.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Genuine American Flag Act''.

SEC. 2. IMPORTATION FOR SALE OF FOREIGN-MADE AMERICAN FLAGS PROHIBITED.

    Beginning 6 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, no 
flag of the United States of America (regardless of size and whether or 
not in compliance with the standard proportions prescribed by Executive 
order) that is the product or manufacture of any foreign country or 
instrumentality may be imported for sale into the United States.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ProUroCare Medical Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard C. Carlson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Richard B. Thon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, that:




(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




/s/ Richard C. CarlsonRichard C. CarlsonChief Executive OfficerMay 9, 2011





/s/ Richard B. ThonRichard B. ThonChief Financial OfficerMay 9, 2011
### §7319. Mammography quality standards

(a) A mammogram may not be performed at a Department facility unless that facility is accredited for that purpose by a private nonprofit organization designated by the Secretary. An organization designated by the Secretary under this subsection shall meet the standards for accrediting bodies established under subsection (e) of section 354 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 263b).

(b) The Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, shall prescribe quality assurance and quality control standards relating to the performance and interpretation of mammograms and use of mammogram equipment and facilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs consistent with the requirements of section 354(f)(1) of the Public Health Service Act. Such standards shall be no less stringent than the standards prescribed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under section 354(f) of the Public Health Service Act.

(c)(1) The Secretary, to ensure compliance with the standards prescribed under subsection (b), shall provide for an annual inspection of the equipment and facilities used by and in Department health care facilities for the performance of mammograms. Such inspections shall be carried out in a manner consistent with the inspection of certified facilities by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under section 354(g) of the Public Health Service Act.

(2) The Secretary may not provide for an inspection under paragraph (1) to be performed by a State agency.

(d) The Secretary shall ensure that mammograms performed for the Department under contract with any non-Department facility or provider conform to the quality standards prescribed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under section 354 of the Public Health Service Act.

(e) For the purposes of this section, the term "mammogram" has the meaning given such term in paragraph (5) of section 354(a) of the Public Health Service Act.

(Added Pub. L. 104–262, title III, §321(a)(1), Oct. 9, 1996, 110 Stat. 3195.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 354 of the Public Health Service Act, referred to in text, is section 354 of act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, which is classified to section 263b of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Deadline for Prescribing Standards

Pub. L. 104–262, title III, §321(b), Oct. 9, 1996, 110 Stat. 3195, required the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to prescribe standards under subsection (b) of this section not later than the end of the 120-day period beginning on Oct. 9, 1996.

#### Implementation Report

Pub. L. 104–262, title III, §321(c), Oct. 9, 1996, 110 Stat. 3195, required the Secretary to submit to Congress a report on the Secretary's implementation of this section not later than 120 days after Oct. 9, 1996.
#### Lillian Vedder, as Administratrix of the Estate of Robert Vedder, Deceased, Respondent, v. Jennie F. Turco et al., Doing Business as Turco Milk Transportation Co., et al., Appellants.

*621All-concur. (Appeal from a judgment for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.
### Part B—Applications and Related Provisions
### §8221. Declaration of purpose

The purpose of this subchapter is to authorize the Secretary to carry out a program of grants to medical schools which have maintained affiliations with the Department in order to assist such schools to expand and improve their training capacities and to cooperate with institutions of the types assisted under subchapter III of this chapter in carrying out the purposes of such subchapter.

(Added Pub. L. 92–541, §2(a), Oct. 24, 1972, 86 Stat. 1104, §5081; renumbered §8221, Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §402(b)(2)(C), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 239; amended Pub. L. 102–83, §4(a)(3), (4), (b)(1), (2)(E), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 404, 405.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–40 renumbered section 5081 of this title as this section.

Pub. L. 102–83 substituted "Secretary" for "Administrator" and "Department" for "Veterans' Administration".
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 21-0574

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

MALINDA CRAZYMULE,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Nickolas C. Murnion, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 13 2023

12/13/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0574
Editorial Note on Part 922
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

§ 922.204 Emergency regulations. ( a ) Where necessary to prevent or minimize the destruction of, loss of, or injury to a Sanctuary resource, or to minimize the imminent risk of such destruction, loss, or injury, any and all activities, other than DoD activities, are subject to immediate temporary regulation, including prohibition. An emergency regulation shall not take effect without the approval of the Governor of Maryland or her/his designee or designated agency.
( b ) Emergency regulations remain in effect until a date fixed in the rule or six months after the effective date, whichever is earlier. The rule may be extended once for not more than six months.
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Agnes M. Gabler, Deceased. Fred H. J. Garr et al., Appellants; Olean Trust Company, Respondent.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Love and Kimball, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 840.]
#### § 919.600 How do suspension and debarment actions start?

When we receive information from any source concerning a cause for suspension or debarment, we will promptly report and investigate it. We refer the question of whether to suspend or debar you to our suspending or debarring official for consideration, if appropriate.
### Part B—Interim Storage Program
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 242 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 242

              To make technical corrections in patent law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 8, 2003

   Mr. Issa (for himself, Mr. Farr, Mr. Nethercutt, and Mr. Meehan) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
              To make technical corrections in patent law.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Plant Breeders Equity Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 35, UNITED STATES CODE.

    (a) Heading.--The heading of section 162 of title 35, United States 
Code, is amended to read as follows:
``Sec. 162. Description, claim, novelty''.
    (b) Novelty.--Section 162 of title 35, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``No plant patent application shall be denied, nor shall any issued 
plant patent be invalidated, on the grounds that the invention was 
described in a printed publication to which section 102(b) of this 
title applies, unless the invention was described in a printed 
publication in this or a foreign country more than ten years prior to 
the date of the application for patent in the United States.''.
    (c) Conforming Amendment.--The item relating to section 162 in the 
table of sections for chapter 15 of title 35, United States Code, is 
amended to read as follows:

``162. Description, claim, novelty.''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply to any 
application for a plant patent that is filed on or after that date, or 
is pending on that date, and to any patent in force on that date.
                                 <all>
```
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-11-0053 - Final Rule:  Enhancements to Emergency Preparedness Regulations (10 CFR Part 50 and 10 CFR Part 52) (RIN-3150-AI10)

Accession Number: ML102150182

Date Released: Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML102150180 - SECY-11-0053 - Final Rule:  Enhancements to Emergency Preparedness Regulations (10 CFR Part 50 and 10 CFR Part 52) (RIN-3150-AI10) and Enclosure 1 (8 page(s), 4/8/2011)
    - ML110811259 - SECY-11-0053 - Enclosure 2 - EP Rule Implementation Matrix (6 page(s), 4/8/2011)
    - ML102150169 - SECY-11-0053 - Enclosure 3 - Federal Register Notice - Enchancement to Emergency Preparedness Regulatons (152 page(s), 4/8/2011)
    - ML102150131 - SECY-11-0053 - Enclosure 4 - Regualtory Analysis and Backfit Analysis (62 page(s), 9/1/2010)
    - ML102150163 - SECY-11-0053 - Enclosure 5 - EP Environmental Assessment (12 page(s), 4/8/2011)
    - ML102150147 - SECY-11-0053 - Enclosure 6 - Summary and Analysis of Public Comments on the Proposed Rule (140 page(s), 4/8/2011)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
regon Department of Environmental Quality

Headquarters

81.1 SW Sixth Avenue

Portland, OR 97204-1390

(503) 229-5696

FAX (503) 229-6124

TTY: 711

Dennis McLerran, Regional Administrator

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10

1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Re: Designation of SKATS Ozone Maintenance Area

Dear Mr. McLerran:

The purpose of this letter is to advise the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that

the Salem-Keizer Area Transportation Study (SKATS) is an ozone maintenance area

under Oregon state law.

SKATS was formerly in non-compliance with the one-hour ozone National Ambient Air

Quality Standard (NAAQS), and was designated as a non-attainment area by EPA. It

subsequently met the requirements for compliance with the one-hour ozone NAAQS, but

did not obtain redesignation as an attainment area before the 1997 eight-hour ozone

NAAQS replaced the one-hour standard. Since that time, SKATS has remained in

compliance with the eight-hour ozone NAAQS.

The state of Oregon considers SKATS an ozone maintenance area under Oregon law. As

a maintenance area, nonattainment-area New Source Rules of the State of Oregon do not

apply to sources in this area. The state will continue all existing ozone strategies as

submitted in the section 110(a)(1) maintenance plan and supporting rules for Portland and

Salem, Oregon submitted on May 22, 2007. DEQ looks forward to EPA proceeding,

under federal law, with its review and approval of the Oregon ozone maintenance plan as

a revision to Oregon's State Implementation Plan.

P_lease_feel_free_to contact me if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

An rew Ginsburg, Ad inistrator

Air Quality Division

John A. Kitzhaber, MD, Governor

September 22, 2011
§ 734.10 Patents and standards-related activity. ( a ) *Patents.* “Technology” is not subject to the EAR if it is contained in any of the following: ( 1 ) A patent or an open (published) patent application available from or at any patent office;
( 2 ) A published patent or patent application prepared wholly from foreign-origin “technology” where the application is being sent to the foreign inventor to be executed and returned to the United States for subsequent filing in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office;
( 3 ) A patent application, or an amendment, modification, supplement or division of an application, and authorized for filing in a foreign country in accordance with the regulations of the Patent and Trademark Office, 37 CFR part 5; or
( 4 ) A patent application when sent to a foreign country before or within six months after the filing of a United States patent application for the purpose of obtaining the signature of an inventor who was in the United States when the invention was made or who is a co-inventor with a person residing in the United States.
( b ) *Standards-related activity.* A standards-related activity includes the development, adoption, or application of a standard (*i.e.,* any document or other writing that provides, for common and repeated use, rules, guidelines, technical or other characteristics for products or related processes and production methods), including but not limited to conformity assessment procedures. A “standards-related activity” includes an action taken for the purpose of developing, promulgating, revising, amending, issuing or reissuing, interpreting, implementing or otherwise maintaining or applying such a standard. When released for a “standards-related activity,” “technology” or “software” is not subject to the EAR provided it meets at least one condition in both paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of this section: ( 1 ) The “technology” or “software” is: ( i ) Designated EAR99;
( ii ) Controlled on the CCL for anti-terrorism reasons only; or
( iii ) For the following ECCN “items” level paragraphs of “technology” or “software” specifically for the “development,” “production,” or “use” of cryptographic functionality once the release is for a “standards-related activity:” “software” that is classified under ECCN 5D002.b or 5D002.c.1 (for equipment specified in ECCN 5A002.a and 5A002.c only); “technology” that is classified under ECCN 5E002 (for equipment specified in ECCN 5A002.a, .b and .c); and “technology” for software controlled under ECCN 5D002.b or .c.1 (for equipment specified in ECCN 5A002.a and .c only) when the release is for a “standards-related activity;” and
( 2 ) The “standards-related activity:” ( i ) Is for a “published” standard; or
( ii ) Occurs with the intent that the resulting standard will be “published.”
[89 FR 58273, July 18, 2024]
### §60101. Definition

For purposes of this chapter, "State" includes the District of Columbia and the territories and possessions of the United States.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1345.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 60101 | 36:4813. | Nov. 5, 1990, Pub. L. 101–510, title XVI, §1614, 104 Stat. 1738. |

Section

The words "the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands" are omitted as included in "the territories and possessions of the United States".
### [§491. Renumbered §431]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 491 of this title, which related to benefits for certain members assigned to the Defense Intelligence Agency, was originally section 431 of this title and was transferred to chapter 8 of this title by Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title VI, §631(d)(2), Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1460, and renumbered section 491 of this title by Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title X, §1076(h)(2), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1955. Section 491 was repealed by Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title VI, §604(a), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 1767. The section was revived to read as it did immediately before its repeal and renumbered section 431 of this title by Pub. L. 117–263, div. A, title VI, §615(a), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 2624. The section was transferred to its original location in Chapter 7 of this title to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to section 491 were contained in section 192 of Title 10, Armed Forces, prior to enactment of section 491 by Pub. L. 99–145.
### IN THE UNI TED STATES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCUIT

No. 11-51011 Summary Calendar
JUAN MANUEL HERNANDEZ-ZAVALA, Petitioner-Appellant

v. U N I T ED STATES OF AMERICA; WARDEN, R.C.D.C. III Bureau of Prisons; GEO GROUP, Respondents-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

(4:11-CV-48)
Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Juan Manuel Hernandez-Zaval a , federal prisoner # 64912-097, an alien against whom the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement has issued

a detainer subjecting him to immediate removal fro m the United States upon release from Bureau of Prisons (BOP) custody, moves this court to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) to appeal the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 p e titi o n challenging the BOP’s exclusion of him from rehabilitation progra m s a nd U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Novembe r 21, 20 12 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5 , the court hasd ete rm inedthat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-51011 Document: 00512061211 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/21/2012No. 11-51011

halfway houses. His arguments are foreclosed by this court’s deci s i o n in Gallegos-Hernandez v. United States , 688 F.3d 190, 192-93 (5th Cir. 2012), petition for cert. filed (Sept. 14, 2012) (No. 12-6450). Accordingly, Hernandez-Zavala’s motion to proceed IFP is DENIED, and his appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See 5 T H C I R . R. 42.2.

2 Case: 11-51011 Document: 00512061211 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/21/2012
§ 295.20 Types of assistance available. This subpart describes the types of assistance that may be provided under the authority of 15 U.S.C. 278n(b)(1). Such assistance includes but is not limited to: ( a ) Partial start-up funding for joint research and development ventures.
( b ) A minority share of the cost of joint research and development ventures for up to five years.
( c ) Equipment, facilities and personnel for joint research and development ventures.