alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 217 (Wednesday, November 10, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65229-65230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25102]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Section 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on August 16,

[[Page 65230]]

2004, Noramco Inc., 1440 Olympic Drive, Athens, Georgia 30601, made 
application by letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for 
registration as a bulk manufacturer of Codeine (9050), a basic class of 
controlled substance in Schedule II.
    The company plans to utilize codeine to produce small quantities of 
naturally occurring codeine impurities for use in quality assurance and 
internal testing of the finished products.
    Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered 
with DEA to manufacture such a substance may file comments or 
objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 
CFR 1301.33(a).
    Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, 
to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, 
Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, 
Washington, DC 20537, Attention: Federal Register Representative, 
Office of Liaison and Policy (ODLR) and must be filed no later than 
January 10, 2005.

    Dated: November 1, 2004.
William J. Walker,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 04-25102 Filed 11-9-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
#### § 930.93 Intergovernmental review process.

The term “intergovernmental review process” describes the procedures established by States pursuant to E.O. 12372, “Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs,” and implementing regulations of the review of federal financial assistance to applicant agencies.
### SUBCHAPTER I—COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Subchapter is based on subchapter A of chapter 8 of subtitle A of title VI of Pub. L. 97–35, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 489, as amended.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 06, 2015. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, July 06, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A15D0443. RANDSTAD US et al. v. DARRIN REINACHER. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 15CV00638
### SUBCHAPTER V—RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior subchapter V of this chapter consisting of sections 4151 and 4152, related to quality assurance, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §401(a)(2)(A), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 210. See Prior Provisions notes set out under section 4114 of this title.

A prior subchapter VI of this chapter was redesignated as subchapter V.

#### Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–328, div. U, title I, §182(a), Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5436, added subchapter V.
KJ

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0610

MARK DEMING, 

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

JASON DEMING and KELLY DEMING,

Defendants and Appellees.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellees’ unopposed Motion for Extension 

of Time to File Response Brief, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Appellees are granted an 

extension of time to and including July 13, 2022, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve the Appellees’ Response to the Appellant’s Opening Brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

June 3 2022

06/03/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0610
### §102. Definitions

As used in this title—

(1) "Postal Service" means the United States Postal Service established by section 201 of this title;

(2) "Board of Governors", and "Board", unless the context otherwise requires, mean the Board of Governors established under section 202 of this title;

(3) "Governors" means the 9 members of the Board of Governors appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, under section 202(a) of this title;

(4) "Inspector General" means the Inspector General appointed under section 202(e) of this title;

(5) "postal service" refers to the delivery of letters, printed matter, or mailable packages, including acceptance, collection, sorting, transportation, or other functions ancillary thereto;

(6) "product" means a postal service with a distinct cost or market characteristic for which a rate or rates are, or may reasonably be, applied;

(7) "rates", as used with respect to products, includes fees for postal services;

(8) "market-dominant product" or "product in the market-dominant category of mail" means a product subject to subchapter I of chapter 36;

(9) "competitive product" or "product in the competitive category of mail" means a product subject to subchapter II of chapter 36; and

(10) "year", as used in chapter 36 (other than subchapters I and VI thereof), means a fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 720; Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, §101(f) [title VI, §662(a)(2)], Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–314, 3009–379; Pub. L. 109–435, title I, §101, Dec. 20, 2006, 120 Stat. 3199.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Pars. (5) to (10). Pub. L. 109–435 added pars. (5) to (10).

1996—Par. (4). Pub. L. 104–208 added par. (4).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1971, pursuant to Resolution No. 71–9 of the Board of Governors. See section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note preceding section 101 of this title.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region III

2443 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. III-12-024

Contact: Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil (630) 829-9663

June 27, 2012

E-Mail: OPA3 @nrc.gov 

NRC FINES JANX INTEGRITY GROUP, INC. $49,000; 

BARS INDIVIDUAL FROM LICENSED ACTIVITIES FOR ONE YEAR

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a $49,000 civil penalty to JANX 

Integrity Group, Inc., (JANX) for safety and security related violations involving the 

performance of industrial radiography by its employees. JANX is located in Parma, Mich.

The violations were identified during an NRC inspection at a temporary jobsite on Spy 

Island, Alaska. An investigation by the NRC’s Office of Investigations was also conducted. As a 

result, safety and security violations were identified.

The NRC found that an individual, now a former JANX radiographer, deliberately 

performed radiographic imaging operations without a second qualified person and deliberately 

avoided and prevented an NRC inspector from completing his inspection. The NRC also found 

that radiation safety signs were not posted in the area while the work was being performed. 

Security violations were also identified, the details of which are not available to the public due to 

the sensitive nature of security information.

“These violations are of significant concern because the actions reflected inadequate 

oversight by the company and the individual acted irresponsibly, which could have resulted in 

significant health and safety consequences,” said Charles Casto, Region III Regional 

Administrator. “We expect the company to take responsibility to ensure safety and security are 

paramount and remain so when dealing with NRC regulated material.”

The company has taken corrective actions to address this issue. 

The NRC has issued an Order to ban the individual for one year from engaging in 

activities within NRC jurisdiction. 

Both the individual and JANX will have to either accept, contest or request mediation of 

the NRC’s decision.
Copies of the Enforcement Action will be posted on the Agencywide Documents Access 

and Management System (ADAMS) at the NRC website.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.
### §11102. Sense of Congress

It is the sense of Congress that, during the five-year period beginning with 1996, executive agencies should achieve each year through improvements in information resources management by the agency—

(1) at least a five percent decrease in the cost (in constant fiscal year 1996 dollars) incurred by the agency in operating and maintaining information technology; and

(2) a five percent increase in the efficiency of the agency operations.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1236.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 11102 | 40:1442. | Pub. L. 104–106, div. E, title LI, §5132, Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 689. |

Section
No. IV-13-012

Contact: Victor Dricks (817) 200-1128

 Lara Uselding (817) 200-1519

 

 April 26, 2013

E-Mail: OPA4@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS RESULTS OF AUGMENTED 

INSPECTION AT ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a public meeting on May 9 to discuss the 

results of an Augmented Inspection conducted at Arkansas Nuclear One to review the 

circumstances surrounding an industrial accident which caused a loss of offsite power to Unit 1 

and an automatic shutdown of Unit 2 on March 31.

The meeting will begin at 2 p.m. in the Reeves E. Richie Training Center at Arkansas 

Nuclear One, 1448 S.R. 333 in Russellvile, Ark. The meeting is open to public observation and 

members of the NRC staff will be available to answer questions from members of the public 

after the business portion of the meeting.

Workers were moving a massive electrical generator stator out of the plant’s turbine 

building during maintenance activity when a lifting rig collapsed, killing one person and injuring 

eight others. Entergy Operations Inc., which operates the plant, declared a Notice of Unusual 

Event, the lowest of four emergency classifications used by the NRC, but terminated it after 

taking corrective actions to stabilize the plant’s power supplies.

The NRC will issue a written report on the results of the inspection within 30 days of the 

public meeting.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV

 1600 E. Lamar Blvd.

 Arlington, TX 76011 - 4125

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov
§ 766.12 Prehearing conference. ( a ) The administrative law judge, on the judge's own motion or on request of a party, may direct the parties to participate in a prehearing conference, either in person or by telephone, to consider: ( 1 ) Simplification of issues;
( 2 ) The necessity or desirability of amendments to pleadings;
( 3 ) Obtaining stipulations of fact and of documents to avoid unnecessary proof; or
( 4 ) Such other matters as may expedite the disposition of the proceedings.
( b ) The administrative law judge may order the conference proceedings to be recorded electronically or taken by a reporter, transcribed and filed with the judge.
( c ) If a prehearing conference is impracticable, the administrative law judge may direct the parties to correspond with the judge to achieve the purposes of such a conference.
( d ) The administrative law judge will prepare a summary of any actions agreed on or taken pursuant to this section. The summary will include any written stipulations or agreements made by the parties.
| Archives   *CBP’s official newsletter CBP Today changed formats in 2007 andwith the winter issue of 2008 was renamed Frontline.**Frontline** appears quarterly.***CBP TodayArchived Issues**							    Archives 2007Jun_Jul			 | 		Apr_May			 | 		Feb_Mar			 | 		Dec_Jan							    Archives 2006October_November			 | 		aug_sep			 | 		June_July			 | 		May			 | 		April			 | 		March							    Archives 2005Nov_Dec			 | 		Sept_Oct			 | 		Jul_Aug			 | 		May_June			 | 		April			 | 		MarchJanuary_February							    Archives 2004Dec			 | 		October/November			 | 		Sep			 | 		Aug			 | 		June			 | 		MayApril			 | 		March			 | 		January / February							    Archives 2003December			 | 		November			 | 		September			 | 		August			 | 		June / July			 | 		MayApril			 | 		March			 | 		February			 | 		January							    Archives 2002December			 | 		November			 | 		October			 | 		September			 | 		August			 | 		JulyJune			 | 		May			 | 		April			 | 		March			 | 		February			 | 		January							    Archives 2001December			 | 		November			 | 		October			 | 		September			 | 		August			 | 		JulyJune			 | 		May			 | 		April			 | 		March			 | 		February			 | 		January						    Archives 2000					December			 | 		November			 | 		October			 | 		September			 | 		August			 | 		JulyJune			 | 		May			 | 		April			 | 		March			 | 		February			 | 		January						    Archives 1999					December			 | 		November			 | 		Octoberback to Current Cover Page                                                                                                                                                                 |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
April 21, 2016



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

LUCIDALIA CHAVEZ , Appellant

NO. 14

- 14

- 00481

- CV V.
WALTER CHAVEZ , Appellee

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment, signed, March 17, 2014, was heard

o n the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We order appellant, Lucid alia Chavez , to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
##### 



Exhibit 12.1 Supplemental Financial Schedule II TeleCommunication Systems, Inc.
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
(amounts in thousands) Column A
    
    Column B
    
    
    Column C
    
    
    Column D
    
    
    Column E
    
    
    Column FBalance
    
    
    Additions,
    
    
    Additions
    
    
    
    
    
    
    BalanceBeginning
    
    
    Costs, and
    
    
    from Acquired
    
    
    
    
    
    
    End ofDescription
    
    of Year
    
    
    Expenses
    
    
    Operations
    
    
    Deductions
    
    
    YearYear ended December 31, 2004 Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
    
    $
    393
    
    
    $
    863
    
    
    $
    1,226
    
    
    $
    (1,127
    )
    
    $
    1,355Year ended December 31, 2003 Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
    
    $
    361
    
    
    $
    357
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    (325
    )
    
    $
    393Year ended December 31, 2002 Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
    
    $
    221
    
    
    $
    353
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    (213
    )
    
    $
    361
 Schedules other than those listed above are omitted because of the absence of the conditions
under which they are required or because the information called for is included in the consolidated
financial statements or notes thereto.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 255

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to grant an easement to facilitate 

access to the Lewis and Clark Interpretative Center in Nebraska City, 

Nebraska. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2003

Mr. BEREUTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to grant an easement to facilitate access to the Lewis and Clark Interpretative Center in Nebraska City, Nebraska.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION TO GRANT EASEMENT. 

4 The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to grant 

5 an easement to Otoe County, Nebraska, for the purpose 

6 of constructing and maintaining an access road between 

7 the Lewis and Clark Interpretive Center in Nebraska City, 

8 Nebraska, and each of the following roads: 

9 (1) Nebraska State Highway 2. 
2

•HR 255 IH 

1 (2) Otoe County Road 67.

Æ
### SUBCHAPTER III—ADVISORY COMMITTEES
BISNIS Trades & Tenders, September 21, 1998 -- PART 2

----

INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT, U.S. & FOREIGN COMMERCIAL SERVICE ANDU.S.
§ 923.43 Direct State land and water use planning and regulation—Technique B. ( a ) The management program must provide for any one or a combination of general techniques specified in subsection 306(d)(11) of the Act for control of land and water uses within the coastal zone. The second such control technique, at subsection 306(d)(11)(B) of the Act, is direct state land and water use planning and regulation (control technique B).
( b ) To have control technique B approved, the State must have the requisite direct authority to plan and regulate land and water uses subject to the management program. This authority can take the form of: ( 1 ) Comprehensive legislation—A single piece of comprehensive legislation specific to coastal management and the requirements of this Act.
( 2 ) Networking—The utilization of authorities which are compatible with and applied on the basis of coastal management policies developed pursuant to § 923.3.
( c ) In order to apply the networking concept, the State must: ( 1 ) Demonstrate that, taken together, existing authorities can and will be used to implement the full range of policies and management techniques identified as necessary for coastal management purposes; and
( 2 ) Bind each party which exercises statutory authority that is part of the management program to conformance with relevant enforceable policies and management techniques. Parties may be bound to conformance through an executive order, administrative directive or a memorandum of understanding provided that: ( i ) The management program authorities provide grounds for taking action to ensure compliance of networked agencies with the program. It will be sufficient if any of the following can act to ensure compliance: The State agency designated pursuant to subsection 306(d)(6) of the Act, the State's Attorney General, another State agency, a local government, or a citizen.
( ii ) The executive order, administrative directive or memorandum of understanding establishes conformance requirements of other State agency activities or authorities to management program policies. A gubernatorial executive order will be acceptable if networked State agency heads are directly responsible to the Governor.
( 3 ) Where networked State agencies can enforce the management program policies at the time of section 306 approval without first having to revise their operating rules and regulations, then any proposed revisions to such rules and regulations which would enhance or facilitate implementation need not be accomplished prior to program approval. Where State agencies cannot enforce coastal policies without first revising their rules and regulations, then these revisions must be made prior to approval of the State's program by the Assistant Administrator.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Justin E. Pelc, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[821 NYS2d 296]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 17, 2005, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Claimant worked for a heating and cooling company performing service, installation and sales. He was provided a company-owned truck and tools which he normally kept at his home. On May 12, 2005, after experiencing difficulties with his employer, claimant completed his shift, removed his personal belongings from the truck and returned it — containing the employer’s tools, uniforms and keys — to the company lot. When claimant did not report to work or call in the following morning, the employer assumed that he had quit, and called him to express his dissatisfaction with the condition of the truck. Claimant did not thereafter return to work, but applied for and received unemployment insurance benefits. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal *1085Board subsequently ruled that he was disqualified from receiving benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. In addition, the Board charged him with a recoverable overpayment of benefits and reduced his right to receive future benefits by eight days. Claimant appeals.

We affirm. Neither general dissatisfaction with working conditions *(see Matter of Fierro [Commissioner of Labor],*306 AD2d 672, 673 [2003]) nor the inability to get along with a supervisor *(see Matter of Micara [Commissioner of Labor],*307 AD2d 568, 569 [2003]) constitutes good cause for leaving employment. Claimant testified that, prior to the incident in question, he had unpleasant discussions with the employer concerning his on call assignments and use of the truck, and was unhappy with his work situation. In view of this, as well as the employer’s testimony that claimant did not express any intention of reporting to work when called and that he never told claimant that he was discharged, substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that claimant left his job for personal and noncompelling reasons. In addition, inasmuch as claimant falsely stated on his unemployment insurance application that he was discharged from his position due to lack of work, substantial evidence also supports the Board’s finding that he made a willful misrepresentation to obtain benefits *(see Matter of Adorisio [Commissioner of Labor],*18 AD3d 942, 943 [2005]).

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Peters, Spain and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.