alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1208.2 Jurisdiction. ( a ) *USERRA.* Under 38 U.S.C. 4324, a person entitled to the rights and benefits provided by chapter 43 of title 38, United States Code, may file an appeal with the Board alleging that a Federal agency employer or the Office of Personnel Management has failed or refused, or is about to fail or refuse, to comply with a provision of that chapter (other than a provision relating to benefits under the Thrift Savings Plan for Federal employees). In general, the provisions of chapter 43 of title 38 that apply to Federal employees guarantee various reemployment rights following a period of service in a uniformed service, provided the employee satisfies the requirements for coverage under that chapter. In addition, chapter 43 of title 38 prohibits discrimination based on a person's service—or application or obligation for service—in a uniformed service (38 U.S.C. 4311). This prohibition applies with respect to initial employment, reemployment, retention in employment, promotion, or any benefit of employment.
( b ) *VEOA.* Under 5 U.S.C. 3330a, a preference eligible who alleges that a Federal agency has violated his rights under any statute or regulation relating to veterans' preference may file an appeal with the Board, provided that he has satisfied the statutory requirements for first filing a complaint with the Secretary of Labor and allowing the Secretary at least 60 days to attempt to resolve the complaint.
#### Andrews Allen and John A. Garcia, copartners, and Allen & Garcia Company, Defendants in Error, v. Arthur H. Swett, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 21,508.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John C. Work, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the March term, 1915.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed January 17, 1916.

Statement of the Case.

Suit by Andrews Allen & John A. Garcia, copartners, and Allen & Garcia Company, a corporation, plaintiffs, against Arthur H. Swett, defendant, to recover for services rendered the defendant. On judgment for the plaintiffs, the defendant brings error.

Suit was brought January 13, 1914, by Allen and Garcia, copartners as Allen & Garcia, against A. H. Swett. March 16, 1914, it was ordered that all papers and proceedings be and they thereby were amended by making Allen & Garcia Company, a corporation, co-plaintiff in the action. Garcia, a mining engineer, was asked by Swett to examine coal land in Iowa and make a report. He did so, and charged for his services and expenses $338.20, for which sum the plaintiff had judgment.- The Lucas Coal & Supply Company, a corporation of which Swett was president and treasurer and a director, was the owner of the mine, and the contention of the defendant was that the Lucas Company and not he was liable for the services rendered.

Castle, Williams, Long & Castle, for plaintiff in error.

Underwood & Smyser, for defendants in error; Charles R. Young and Arthur A. Basse, of counsel.

*476Abstract of the Decision.

Appeal and error, § *1714*—when question of misjoinder of parties waived.*Where, on review on a writ of error, it does not appear that the plaintiff in error objected in the trial court on the ground of misjoinder of the plaintiffs below, and the propriety of such joinder is not questioned by any assignment of error, nor argued in the brief of the plaintiff in error except in his reply brief, such misjoinder, if any, must be considered as waived.

Mr. Justice Baker

delivered the opinion of the court.
§ 911.8 Technical requirements. ( a ) All platform operators of the NOAA DCS must use a data collection platform radio set whose technical and design characteristics are certified to conform to applicable specifications and regulations.
( b ) All platform operators are responsible for all costs associated with the procurement and operation of the platforms, and for the acquisition of data from those platforms, either directly from the satellite or from the applicable data processing center.
### §4006. Protection of States' rights

(a) Nothing in this chapter shall be interpreted to adversely affect existing State regulatory or enforcement power which has been granted to any State through the Clean Water Act [33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.] or Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 [16 U.S.C. 1451 et seq.].

(b) Nothing in this chapter shall be interpreted to expand the regulatory or enforcement power of the Federal Government which has been delegated to any State through the Clean Water Act or Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972.

(Pub. L. 105–383, title VI, §607, formerly §606, Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3450; renumbered §607, Pub. L. 117–144, §2(a)(1), June 16, 2022, 136 Stat. 1266.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Clean Water Act, referred to in text, is act June 30, 1948, ch. 758, as amended generally by Pub. L. 92–500, §2, Oct. 18, 1972, 86 Stat. 816, also known as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, which is classified generally to chapter 26 (§1251 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1251 of this title and Tables.

The Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, referred to in text, is title III of Pub. L. 89–454, as added by Pub. L. 92–583, Oct. 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1280, which is classified generally to chapter 33 (§1451 et seq.) of Title 16, Conservation. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1451 of Title 16 and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly set out in a note under section 1451 of Title 16, Conservation.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 607 of Pub. L. 105–383 was renumbered section 608 and is classified to section 4007 of this title.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 22, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62609-62610]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-24608]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

DOE/NSF Nuclear Science Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Office of Science, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of Renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 14(a)(2)(A) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, (Pub. L. 92-463), and in

[[Page 62610]]

accordance with Title 41 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 
102-3.65, and following consultation with the Committee Management 
Secretariat, General Services Administration, notice is hereby given 
that the DOE/NSF Nuclear Science Advisory Committee (NSAC) will be 
renewed for a two-year period.
    The Committee will provide advice and recommendations to the 
Director, Office of Science (DOE), and the Assistant Director, 
Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences (NSF), on scientific 
priorities within the field of basic nuclear science research.
    Additionally, the renewal of the DOE/NSF Nuclear Science Advisory 
Committee has been determined to be essential to conduct business of 
the Department of Energy and the National Science Foundation, and to be 
in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties 
imposed upon the Department of Energy and National Science Foundation, 
by law and agreement. The Committee will continue to operate in 
accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 
adhering to the rules and regulations in implementation of that Act.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Timothy Hallman at (301) 903-3613.

    Issued in Washington, DC on September 30, 2013.
Carol A. Matthews,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-24608 Filed 10-21-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
Amendment No. 1 to 2007 Amendment and Restatement of Performance Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10(e)(15) 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 TO THE 
 2007 AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF 
 XEROX CORPORATION 2004 PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE PLAN 
 WITNESSETH: 
 WHEREAS, Xerox Corporation (the
“Company”) has established the 2007 Amendment and Restatement of the Xerox Corporation 2004 Performance Incentive Plan (hereinafter referred to as the “Plan”), and 
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan, 
 NOW, THEREFORE, Section 2 of the Plan is hereby
amended to read in its entirety as follows: 
  

	 “2.
	 Effective Date and Term 


 The
Plan shall be effective as of May 20, 2004, subject to the approval of the Company’s shareholders at the 2004 annual meeting. No awards or grants can be made after April 30, 2012 unless terminated sooner pursuant to Section 13 by
the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”). Effective May 20, 2004, no further awards shall be made under a Predecessor Plan, but outstanding awards under any Predecessor Plan shall remain outstanding in accordance with their
applicable terms and conditions.” 
 The foregoing amendment is effective as of May 24, 2007. In all other respects, the Plan shall remain
unchanged. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be signed as of the
31st day of May, 2007. 
  

			
	 XEROX CORPORATION

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Patricia M. Nazemetz

		 	 Vice President
No. IV-11-040

Contact: Victor Dricks (817) 860-8128

 Lara Uselding (817) 276-6519

 

September 12, 2011 

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

NRC SENDS SPECIAL INSPECTION TEAM TO FORT CALHOUN NUCLEAR PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has begun a special inspection at the Fort 

Calhoun Station to review the circumstances surrounding a breaker fire that resulted in an Alert 

declaration on June 7. The plant, operated by the Omaha Public Power District, is located about 

20 miles north of Omaha, Neb. and has been shutdown since April for a refueling outage and 

impacts from the Missouri River floodwaters.

A team of three NRC inspectors, who began their work today, will evaluate the 

circumstances leading up to a fire in a switchgear room housing buses that provide power to 

multiple pieces of equipment. The fire caused a temporary loss of power to the spent fuel pool 

cooling pumps that circulate water through the pool. There were no major safety impacts due to 

the plant being in a safe shutdown condition. 

The NRC is conducting a special inspection to ensure that the causes are known and 

corrected prior to the plant being approved to restart.

“We want to thoroughly understand the circumstances surrounding the fire and the 

modification made to the breaker component that may have potentially caused the fire, “said 

Region IV Administrator Elmo E. Collins.

The NRC inspectors will write an inspection report on their findings within 45 days of 

the end of the inspection that will be publicly available.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125

Telephone: (817) 860-8128

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov
§ 904.250 Notice of time and place of hearing. ( a ) The Judge shall be responsible for scheduling the hearing. With due regard for the convenience of the parties, their representatives, or witnesses, the Judge shall fix the time, place and date for the hearing and shall notify all parties of the same. The Judge will promptly serve on the parties notice of the time and place of hearing. The hearing will not be held less than 20 days after service of the notice of hearing unless the hearing is expedited as provided under paragraph (d) of this section.
( b ) A request for a change in the time, place, or date of the hearing may be granted by the Judge.
( c ) Upon the consent of each party to the administrative proceeding, the Judge may order that one or more issues be heard on submissions or affidavits if it appears that such issues may be resolved by means of written materials and that efficient disposition of those issues can be made without an in-person hearing.
( d ) At any time after commencement of an administrative proceeding, any party may move to expedite the scheduling of the administrative proceeding as provided in § 904.209.
[71 FR 12448, Mar. 10, 2006, as amended at 87 FR 38939, June 30, 2022]
§ 890.804 Coverage. ( a ) *Type of enrollment.* A former spouse who meets the requirements of § 890.803 may elect coverage for self only, self plus one, or self and family. A self and family enrollment covers only the former spouse and all eligible children of both the former spouse and the employee, former employee, or employee annuitant, provided such children are not otherwise covered by a health plan under this part. A self plus one enrollment covers only the former spouse and one eligible child of both the former spouse and the employee, former employee, or employee annuitant, provided the child is not otherwise covered by a health plan under this part. A child must be under age 26 or incapable of self-support because of a mental or physical disability existing before age 26. No person may be covered by two enrollments.
( b ) A child is considered to be the child of the former spouse or the employee, former employee, or employee annuitant if he or she is— ( 1 ) A natural child; or
( 2 ) An adopted child.
( c ) *Child incapable of self-support.* When a former spouse enrolls for a family enrollment which includes a child who has become 26 years of age and is incapable of self-support, the employing office shall determine such child's eligibility in accordance with § 890.302(c), (d), and (e).
[78 FR 64877, Oct. 30, 2013, as amended at 80 FR 55737, Sept. 17, 2015]
§ 923.132 Definitions. ( a ) *Continuing review* means monitoring State performance on an ongoing basis. As part of the continuing review, evaluations of approved CZM programs will be conducted and written findings will be produced at least once every three years.
( b ) *Adherence* means to comply with the approved CZM program and financial assistance award or work program.
( c ) *Interim sanction* means suspension and redirection of any portion of financial assistance extended to any coastal State under this title, if the Secretary determines that the coastal State is failing to adhere to the management program or a State plan developed to manage a national estuarine reserve, or a portion of the program or plan approved by the Secretary, or the terms of any grant or cooperative agreement funded under this title.
( d ) *Approved CZM program* means those elements of the program approved by the Secretary, under 15 CFR part 923 (Development and Approval Provisions), including any changes to those elements made by approved amendments and routine program implementation.
( e ) *Financial assistance award* means a legal instrument that creates a relationship between the Federal government and another entity (recipient). The principal purpose of the award is the transfer of money or services in order to accomplish a public purpose authorized by Federal statute. The term “financial assistance award” encompasses grants, loans, and cooperative agreements. The following elements constitute the award: ( 1 ) The work program described in the approved application;
( 2 ) The budget;
( 3 ) The standard terms and conditions of the award;
( 4 ) Any special award conditions included with the award;
( 5 ) The statutes and regulations under which the award is authorized; and
( 6 ) Applicable OMB cost principles and administrative requirements.
( f ) *Work program* means a description of the tasks to be undertaken by a State for a given time period for the purpose of implementing and enforcing an approved CZM program. The work program is submitted as a part of a Federal financial assistance application, or separately in the absence of Federal financial assistance.
( g ) *Assistant Administrator* means the Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services and Coastal Zone Management, or the NOAA Official responsible for directing the Federal Coastal Zone Management Program.
[47 FR 21021, May 17, 1982, as amended at 57 FR 31113, July 14, 1992. Redesignated at 61 FR 33818, June 28, 1996]
§ 270.330 Moving and preserving evidence. ( a ) A Team and NIST will take all necessary steps in moving and preserving evidence obtained during the course of an investigation under the Act to ensure that such evidence is preserved.
( b ) In collecting and preserving evidence in the course of an investigation under the Act, a Team and NIST will: ( 1 ) Maintain records to ensure that each piece of evidence is identified as to its source;
( 2 ) Maintain and document an appropriate chain of custody for each piece of evidence;
( 3 ) Use appropriate means to preserve each piece of evidence; and
( 4 ) Ensure that each piece of evidence is kept in a suitably secure facility.
( c ) If a Federal law enforcement agency suspects and notifies the Director that a building failure being investigated by a Team under the Act may have been caused by a criminal act, the Team, in consultation with the Federal law enforcement agency, will take necessary actions to ensure that evidence of the criminal act is preserved and that the original evidence or copies, as appropriate, are turned over to the appropriate law enforcement authorities.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-12-0071 - Final Rule:  Domestic Licensing of Source Material - Amendments/Integrated Safety Analysis (RIN 3150-AI50)

Accession Number: ML12094A344

Date Released: Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML12095A031 - SECY-12-0071 - Final Rule:  Domestic Licensing of Source Material -Amendments/Integrated Safety Analysis (RIN 3150-AI50) (7 page(s), 5/7/2012)
    - ML12095A032 - SECY-12-0071 - Enclosure 1:  FRN Final Rule: Domestic Licensing of Source Material - Amendments/Integrated Safety Analysis (153 page(s), 5/7/2012)
    - ML12095A037 - SECY-12-0071 - Enclosure 2:  Regulatory Analysis Part 40 Integrated Safety Analysis Final Rule (25 page(s), 5/7/2012)
    - ML12095A033 - SECY-12-0071 - Enclosure 3:  Environmental Assessment and Finding of no Significant Impact for the Final Rule Amending 10 CFR Part 40 Domestic Licensing of Source Material - Amendments/Integrated Safety Analysis (7 page(s), 5/7/2012)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
§ 904.301 Bases for permit sanctions or denials. ( a ) Unless otherwise specified in a settlement agreement, or otherwise provided by statutes or in this subpart, NOAA may sanction any permit issued under the statutes cited in § 904.1(c). The bases for an action to sanction or deny a permit include the following: ( 1 ) Violation of any statute administered by NOAA, including violation of any regulation promulgated or permit condition or restriction prescribed thereunder, by the permit holder/applicant or with the use of a permitted vessel;
( 2 ) The failure to pay a civil penalty imposed under any marine resource law administered by NOAA;
( 3 ) The failure to pay a criminal fine imposed or to satisfy any other liability incurred in a judicial proceeding under any of the statutes administered by NOAA; or
( 4 ) The failure to pay any amount in settlement of a civil forfeiture imposed on a vessel or other property.
( b ) A sanction may be applied to a permit involved in the underlying violation, as well as to any permit held or sought by the permit holder/applicant, including permits for other vessels. (See, e.g., 16 U.S.C. 1858(g)(1)(i)).
( c ) A permit sanction may not be extinguished by sale or transfer. A vessel's permit sanction is not extinguished by sale or transfer of the vessel, nor by dissolution or reincorporation of a vessel owner corporation, and shall remain with the vessel until lifted by NOAA.
[87 FR 38941, June 30, 2022]
###### Editorial Note on Subpart B of Part 9701

#### Editorial Note:

At 73 FR 58435, Oct. 7, 2008, the application of subpart B to part 9701 was rescinded.

#### § 9701.232 Special transition rules for Federal Air Marshal Service.

Notwithstanding any other provision in this subpart, if DHS transfers Federal Air Marshal Service positions from the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) to another organization within DHS, DHS may cover those positions under a classification system that is parallel to the classification system that was applicable to the Federal Air Marshal Service within TSA. DHS may, after coordination with OPM, modify that system. DHS will issue implementing directives on converting Federal Air Marshal Service employees to any new classification system that may subsequently be established under this subpart, consistent with the conversion rules in § 9701.231.
#### § 918.4 Duration of Sea Grant College designation.

Designation will be made on the basis of merit and the determination by the Secretary of Commerce that such a designation is consistent with the goals of the Act. Continuation of the Sea Grant College designation is contingent upon the institution's ability to maintain a high quality performance consistent with the requirements outlined above. The Secretary may, for cause and after an opportunity for hearing, suspend or terminate a designation as a Sea Grant College.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James Cahill and Jack Lewin, Appellants.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Cohn, Callahan, Van Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA



### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT

REGINA CLARK

,

Appellant,

v.

DAVID T. CLARK

,

Appellee

.

No. 2D 20 2 3

- 2399

May 2 4 , 20 2 4

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for

Hillsborough County; Lindsay M. Alvarez, Judge.

Regina Clark, pro se.

No appearance for Appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT

, VILLANTI

, and ROTHSTEIN

- YOUAKIM

, JJ.

, Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.