alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TO:               Robert D. Hardy
DATE:             July 16, 2003
FROM:             Harold C. Simmons
                  Steven L. Watson

RE:               NL Industries, Inc.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The terms of your separation from NL Industries,  Inc. and its subsidiaries will
be in accordance with the following:

1)   You will  continue  in the  position  of Vice  President,  Chief  Financial
     Officer and  Controller  for each of NL and KII until the respective NL and
     KII 2nd quarter Form 10-Q's and ancillary documents are filed with the SEC.
     Your  responsibilities  will  include  executing  required   certifications
     related to  historical  financial  statements  included  in SEC  filings or
     otherwise for periods during which you have held the  applicable  position.
     You will continue  providing services on a full time basis, as requested by
     our  designee(s),  and be paid salary at an annual rate of $400,000 through
     9/30/03.

2)   From  9/30/03 to  12/31/03  you will serve as a  consultant  to NL on an as
     needed basis consistent with your search for a new employment position. You
     will be paid semi-monthly at an annual rate of $400,000 through 12/31/03.

3)   Lump sum severance/bonus  payments of $200,000 each will be paid on 9/30/03
     and 12/31/03. These payments will extinguish all obligations due to you and
     you will not be entitled to any other severance or bonus payments under any
     agreements, plans or policies.

4)   Stock option and employee benefits, other than severance and bonus plans or
     policies,  will be governed by the terms of the applicable plans, with your
     effective  termination date deemed being (i) with respect to stock options,
     6/30/04,  and (ii) with respect to all other applicable  employee benefits,
     the earlier of 12/31/03 or the date upon which you secure  other  full-time
     employment.

5)   From 1/1/04 through 6/30/04 a consulting retainer will be paid at a rate of
     $15,000 per month, plus  reimbursement of your reasonable  expenses,  which
     will terminate upon your attainment of other full-time employment.  NL will
     be entitled to up to 50 hours of your  services per month in return for the
     retainer. Hours exceeding 50 hours per month will be paid at a rate of $200
     per hour.  Subsequent to the  termination of the consulting  retainer,  you
     agree to provide consulting services as may be reasonably requested,  which
     are  consistent  with your time  availability,  at a rate of $200 per hour,
     plus reimbursement of your reasonable expenses.

6)   It is understood  that your work  performance  during the periods set forth
     above will be consistent with your prior performance.

Acknowledged and Agreed:

By: /s/Robert D. Hardy                                        Date: 07/17/03
    ------------------                                              --------
## ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET 

# Attachment Number008 Attachment Name Attachment 8PbSrTiZrO Process Flow 

# Associated PMNSection Number Pt.2, Sec.A,1d. DoesnotcontainCBI



# ReportNumber CONSI 1031778685535100- 00 000 000 

## oo
0 0 Q 

## ~~ 

# o0 toC = t; 00 

## r--- 

# o 0.0 * 0 0 

## 0 cjqj 0 l 0 0 

### to to gb OU 0 0 0 c
.5 0 " 

## o~t (U-.0,t 00 

## (U'

- ;--4 0 

# u

4-z0 00 w "00 

## ~c >0 

## ~ 4- C4 m u cn (D 

## Z (I Z

* 000. 0
0 0 

### 5)) 

## 0.

0 o0 0 ; Cd 00 

# E~L 00. 

### Qn 0 

### -- 0 .-'-14 0
-l 00o.aon.

U 

### . 

# u 0. 00tn 00) 00 en 0 

# z 0 u

oo C)ICL u0 

# o rA n 4) a~ ) 

# 3 "u1e CC
0 

### or E4 o4b : 

### E r* 00CA
0
NRC TO HIGHLIGHT VENDOR INSPECTION ACTIVITIES DURING NEW REACTOR 

CONSTRUCTION WORKSHOP IN BALTIMORE JUNE 28

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will explain its oversight process for companies that 

support new reactor construction during a workshop June 28 in Baltimore.

“Vendors’ quality products and expertise are vital to ensuring new reactors are built to operate 

safely,” said Laura Dudes, Director of the Division of Construction Inspection in the NRC’s Office of 

New Reactors. “We want to ensure current and potential vendors understand our requirements, and 

how rigorously we oversee construction sites and the vendors themselves.” 

The workshop is open to the public and runs from 8 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. on June 28 at the 

Renaissance Baltimore Harborplace Hotel located at 202 East Pratt St. Baltimore. Presenters will 

include NRC staff, the Nuclear Procurement Issues Committee (NUPIC, an industry vendor 

clearinghouse), the Nuclear Energy Institute, the Electric Power Research Institute and current 

nuclear vendors. Those interested in attending the workshop should pre-register by June 17. 

Individuals needing reasonable accommodations to participate in the workshop should contact 

Marlayna Vaaler by June 10, via e-mail at Marlayna.Vaaler@nrc.gov or via phone at 

301-415-3178.

The workshop brings together members of the public, licensees, applicants, vendors, basic 

component suppliers, industry organizations, and the NRC staff to discuss issues including:

vendor oversight for new reactor construction;

quality assurance rulemaking activities;

international calibration laboratories;

current activities to prevent the use of counterfeit, fraudulent, or suspect items;

using commercial-grade items in safety-related applications;

software quality assurance; and

non-reactor vendor inspections.

NRC staff will be available at the end of each workshop session for additional discussions. 

The NRC is holding the workshop in conjunction with the NUPIC vendor meeting to ensure vendors 

can participate. Additional workshop information is available on the NRC website. 

###

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should contact 

the Office of Public Affairs beforehand.

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES link on 

the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's 

website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 12-050 May 9, 2012
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Duane J. Charache, Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 728]

Appeal from an order of the Genesee County Court (Robert C. Noonan, J.), entered June 8, 2005. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level three risk under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 *et seq.).*The total risk factor score on the risk assessment instrument prepared by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders (Board) resulted in the presumptive classification of defendant as a level three risk, but the Board recommended a downward departure to level two. County Court, however, “was not ‘bound by the recommendation of the Board and, in the exercise of its discretion, [was entitled to] depart from that recommendation and determine [defendant’s] risk level based upon the facts and circumstances that appear [ed] in the record’ ” *(People v Carswell,*8 AD3d 1073, 1073 [2004], *lv denied*3 NY3d 607 [2004], quoting *Matter of New York State Bd. of Examiners of Sex Offenders v Ransom,*249 AD2d 891, 891-892 [1998]). The record supports the court’s determination that there was no “mitigating factor of a kind, or to a degree, not otherwise adequately taken into account by the guidelines,” and thus that a departure from the presumptive risk level was not warranted (Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, at 4 [Nov. 1997]). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that he was denied due process as the result of the failure of the prosecutor to provide timely notice as required by Correction Law § 168-n (3) that he would be seeking a risk level determination differing from the Board’s recommendation *(see People v Smith,*17 AD3d 1045 [2005], *lv denied*5 NY3d 705 [2005]; *see also People v Girup,*9 AD3d 913, 914 [2004]). We decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice *(see*CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). Present — Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Gorski and Green, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 17, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 67360]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25455]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies; Correction

    This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc. 04-24999) published on pages 
65195 and 65196 of the issue for Wednesday, November 10, 2004.
    Under the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis heading, the entry for 
Charles Keith Akin, is revised to read as follows:
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. Charles Keith Akin, Clinton, Kentucky; and the Akin Control 
Group, which consists of Charles Keith Akin; Anita Akin; Burkley 
Investments, Inc.; Parkway Manor - KY; and Parkway Manor - TN, all of 
Clinton, Kentucky; and Bruce Akin, Paducah, Kentucky; to acquire 
additional voting shares of Purchase Area Bancorp, Bardwell, Kentucky, 
and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Bardwell Deposit Bank, 
Bardwell, Kentucky.
    Comments on this application must be received by November 24, 2004.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 10, 
2004.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 04-25455 Filed 11-16-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Margaret Riechel, Respondent, against Stokol Sales of New York et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, allowing death benefits on account of the death of the claimant’s husband. The question raised is whether the death of the decedent was solely due to intoxication while on duty, within the meaning of section 10 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law and section 18 of article I of the New York State Constitution. The decedent, a pipefitter’s helper, was returning to the employer’s premises from a plumbing job, with fellow employees in the employer’s truck. The truck had an open stake body with a tarpaulin cover over the stakes. There was no tailboard at the rear of the truck and the back was open. While the truck was in motion, the decedent moved to the left rear part of the truck, where he stood up and proceeded to urinate onto the highway. While so engaged, he held on to a stake on the left side of the truck. The road curved to the right and as the truck followed the curve, the decedent lost his balance and fell off the truck. He died as the result of a fractured skull which he sustained when he struck the highway. The proof of the decedent’s intoxication was overwhelming but, upon this record, the board was justified in finding that decedent’s death did not result solely from his intoxication. The operation of the truck around the curve, throwing the decedent off balance and catapulting him onto the highway, was the immediate active cause of the decedent’s injury. At most, the decedent’s intoxication was one of the contributing factors in bringing about his injury; it was not the sole cause. Because of his intoxication, decedent placed himself in a dangerous position in which he would not have placed himself if he had been sober but his situation was a passive one and no injury would have resulted if an active force had not been brought to bear upon the situation by an independent human agency. This case is to be differentiated from a case in which an intoxicated person falls to his own injury, without the intervention of any other agency, or in which the intoxicated person is in control of the instrumentality which is the sole cause of his injury. (See *Matter of Shannon*v. *American Gan Go.,*278 App. Div. 546, motion for leave to appeal denied 303 N. Y. 1016.) Under subdivision 4 of section 21 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, there is a presumption that the injuries did not result solely from the intoxication of decedent while on duty. The presumption was not overcome by the proof in this case. Under the circumstances, the board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence and must be affirmed. Award and decision unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Imrie, JJ.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****� News. Computer and Internet use at work in ... [electronicresource].**
 
2001 | 2003
 
SuDoc Number:L 2.120/2-22:
Item Number:0769-P-04 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000931204
 
February 6, 2020
§ 971.205 Vessel safety and documentation. In order to provide a basis for the necessary determinations with respect to the safety of life and property at sea, pursuant to § 971.407, § 971.422 and Subpart G of this part, the application must contain the following information for vessels used in commercial recovery, except for those vessels under 300 gross tons which are engaged in oceanographic research: ( a ) *U.S. flag vessel.* All mining ships and at least one of the transport ships used by each permittee must be documented under the laws of the United States. To the extent that the applicant knows which United States flag vessels it will use, it must include with its application copies of the vessels' current valid Coast Guard Certificates of Inspection.
( b ) *Foreign flag vessels.* To the extent that the applicant knows which foreign flag vessel(s) it will be using for other purposes, the application must include evidence of the following: ( 1 ) That any foreign flag vessel whose flag state is party to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974 (SOLAS 74) possesses current valid SOLAS 74 certificates;
( 2 ) That any foreign flag vessel whose flag state is not party to SOLAS 74 but is party to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1960 (SOLAS 60) possesses current valid SOLAS 60 certificates; and
( 3 ) That any foreign flag vessel whose flag state is not a party to either SOLAS 74 or SOLAS 60 meets all applicable structural and safety requirements contained in the published rules of a member of the International Association of Classification Societies (IACS).
( c ) *Supplemental certificates.* If the applicant does not know at the time of submitting an application which vessels it will be using, it must submit the applicable certification for each vessel before the cruise on which it will be used.
§ 3.1 Authority. ( a ) Under section 3 of the HAVANA Act of 2021 (Pub. L. 117-46), codified in 22 U.S.C. 2680b, the Secretary of Commerce or other agency heads may provide a payment for a qualifying injury to the brain to a covered employee or covered dependent, who incurred a qualifying injury to the brain on or after January 1, 2016. The authority to provide such payments is at the sole discretion of the Secretary or their designee.
( b ) The regulations in this part are issued in accordance with 22 U.S.C. 2680b(i)(4) and also apply to former covered employees of the Department of Commerce and their covered dependents.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

        CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

         I, David H. Fleischman, Chief Financial Officer of TradeStation Group,
Inc., hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

         The Annual Report on Form 10-K of TradeStation Group, Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TradeStation
Group, Inc.

         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.

March 12, 2004                     /s/ David H. Fleischman
--------------                     --------------------------------------------
Date                               David H. Fleischman
                                   Chief Financial Officer,
                                      Vice President of Finance and Treasurer
Editorial Note on Part 400
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 400 appear at 78 FR 69289, Nov. 19, 2013.

§ 400.47 Retail trade. ( a ) *In general.* Retail trade is prohibited in activated areas of zones, except that 1) sales or other commercial activity involving domestic, duty-paid, and duty-free goods may be conducted within an activated area of a zone under a permit issued by the zone grantee and approved by the Board, and 2) no permits shall be necessary for sales involving domestic, duty-paid or duty-free food and non-alcoholic beverage products sold within the zone or subzone for consumption on premises by individuals working therein. The Executive Secretary shall determine whether an activity is retail trade, subject to review by the Board when the zone grantee requests such a review with a good cause. Determinations on whether an activity constitutes retail trade shall be based on precedent established through prior rulings by CBP, as appropriate. Such prior rulings shall remain effective unless a determination is issued to modify their effect (after a notice-and-comment process, as appropriate). Determinations made by the Executive Secretary pursuant to this section shall be made available to the public via the Board's Web site.
( b ) *Procedure.* Requests for Board approval under this section shall be submitted in letter form, with supporting documentation, to the Executive Secretary, who is authorized to act for the Board in these cases, after consultation with CBP as necessary.
( c ) *Criteria.* In evaluating requests under this section, the Executive Secretary and CBP shall consider factors that may include: ( 1 ) Whether any public benefits would result from approval; and
( 2 ) The economic effect such activity would have on the retail trade outside the zone in the port of entry area.
Tsunami Flooding Assessment 

Using Forecast Tools

Yong Wei1,2, Vasily Titov1

1. Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, 

NOAA

2. University of Washington

Workshop on probabilistic flood hazard assessment

January 29-31, Rockville, MD

Panel 5: Tsunami flooding
56003

56001

55023

55015

Detection

 Tsunameter

Inversion

 Prop. Database

Inun. forecast

 Forecast Models

NOAA’s Tsunami Forecast Methodology

Forecast tests:

• 33 real-time tests

• 6 data tests

• 39 global test events
Tsunamicast – a forecast tool developed for NRC
West Pacific East Pacific

Tsunami Propagation Database:

1725 unit sources for pre-computed tsunami events.
PMEL Tsunami Unit Source:

• 100 km × 50 km

• Placed along subduction zones and known tsunamigenic

faults

• Aligned to fit known fault geometries

• Computed using linear shallow-water equations

• Can be linearly combined for source magnitude > 7.5

Indian

Ocean

Atlantic

Ocean
Related reference: PMEL tsunami forecast series on model development http://nctr.pmel.noaa.gov/most-pubs.html
Tsunami Flooding Assessment Using Forecast Tools

PTHA tsunami hazard 

maps

PMEL tsunami forecast 

tools

Reconstruct disaggregated

scenarios using a combination

of PMEL “unit tsunami sources”:

• source location

• magnitude

• rupture area

• slip

Tsunami inundation modeling for 

reconstructed sources 

Tuning for PTHA tsunami height 

using unit tsunami sources

Derive probabilistic flooding 

hazard maps using an envelop 

of inundation lines obtained from 

above steps

- Source disaggregation 

and selection

Courtesy of Thio et al. 

(2010)

- Offshore tsunami 

height for an ARP level

Courtesy of Thio et al. 

(2010)
### Part A—HOPE for Homeownership of Multifamily Units
#### § 847.502 Transfers to the CSR Fund.

For elections of CSRS or FERS coverage under § 847.411 or FERS coverage and service credit under § 847.421, the amount under § 847.504 will be transferred to the Fund using the procedures established under § 847.506.
Order entered March 21, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 12
- 01681
- CV WALTER MITCHELL, Appellant
V. TONYA CHANDLER, ET A L . , Appellee s On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial C ourt Cause No. 10
- 12330
- J 

### O RDER The Court has before it appellant’s March 18, 2013 motion to file late brief and amended brief. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS that the brief tendered by appellant on March 18, 2013 be filed as of today’s date. T he Court ORDERS that any amended brief be filed by March 22, 2013.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE