alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2107. Savings provisions

This chapter does not—

(1) restrict the disclosure of information to, or its receipt by, a person or class of persons authorized, in accordance with applicable agency regulations or procedures, to receive that information;

(2) restrict a contractor from disclosing its own bid or proposal information or the recipient from receiving that information;

(3) restrict the disclosure or receipt of information relating to a Federal agency procurement after it has been canceled by the Federal agency before contract award unless the Federal agency plans to resume the procurement;

(4) prohibit individual meetings between a Federal agency official and an offeror or potential offeror for, or a recipient of, a contract or subcontract under a Federal agency procurement, provided that unauthorized disclosure or receipt of contractor bid or proposal information or source selection information does not occur;

(5) authorize the withholding of information from, nor restrict its receipt by, Congress, a committee or subcommittee of Congress, the Comptroller General, a Federal agency, or an inspector general of a Federal agency;

(6) authorize the withholding of information from, nor restrict its receipt by, the Comptroller General in the course of a protest against the award or proposed award of a Federal agency procurement contract; or

(7) limit the applicability of a requirement, sanction, contract penalty, or remedy established under another law or regulation.

(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3731.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2107 | 41:423(h). | Pub. L. 93–400, §27(h), as added Pub. L. 100–679, §6(a), Nov. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 4063; Pub. L. 101–189, title VIII, §814(a)–(d)(1), Nov. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 1495; Pub. L. 101–510, title XIV, §1484(l)(6), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1720; Pub. L. 102–25, title VII, §705(i), Apr. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 121; Pub. L. 103–355, title VIII, §8301(e), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3397; Pub. L. 104–106, title XLIII, §4304(a), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 663. |

Section
#### Harry A. Moody, Respondent, v. Isaac Morris, Appellant.

Motion denied on condition that defendant perfect his appeal, place the case on the June calendar and be ready for argument when reached; otherwise, motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Present — Jenks, P. J., Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Putnam, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                            WOIZE INTERNATIONAL LTD.
               FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I am  the  Chief  Financial  Officer  of  Woize  International  Ltd.,  a  Nevada
corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection with
the Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended December 31, 2005 and filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Form 10-QSB").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information  contained
in the Form 10-QSB  fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.




February 21, 2006                                /s/ Anders Dankers
                                                 -----------------------------
                                                 Anders Dankers
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                                 (Principal Accounting Officer)
#### Frances B. Mendoza, Respondent, v. Armando E. Mendoza, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendant to answer within ten days after service of the order, with notice of entry thereof, on payment of said costs. Ho opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. [See *post,*p. 894.]
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 33 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.33

                      One Hundred Twelfth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twelve

                                 An Act

 
 To amend the Securities Act of 1933 to specify when certain securities 
     issued in connection with church plans are treated as exempted 
                  securities for purposes of that Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Church Plan Investment Clarification 
Act''.
SEC. 2. SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 AMENDMENT.
    Section 3(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77c(a)(2)) 
is amended--
        (1) by inserting ``(other than a retirement income account 
    described in section 403(b)(9) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
    1986, to the extent that the interest or participation in such 
    single trust fund or collective trust fund is issued to a church, a 
    convention or association of churches, or an organization described 
    in section 414(e)(3)(A) of such Code establishing or maintaining 
    the retirement income account or to a trust established by any such 
    entity in connection with the retirement income account)'' after 
    ``403(b) of such Code''; and
        (2) by inserting ``(other than a person participating in a 
    church plan who is described in section 414(e)(3)(B) of the 
    Internal Revenue Code of 1986)'' after ``section 401(c)(1) of such 
    Code''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
# L_2015156EN.01000101.xml

| 20.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 156/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 156/1

---

Information concerning the signature of the Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and Algeria, of the other part, on a Framework Agreement between the European Union and Algeria on the general principles for the participation of Algeria in Union programmes

The above Protocol between the European Union and Algeria was signed on 4 June 2015 in Brussels.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 16, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Electronic Industries Alliance (“EIA”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: Electronic Industries Alliance, Arlington, VA. The nature and scope of EIA's standards development activities are: The development and maintenance of voluntary industry standards and related documents, formulation of positions for presentation on behalf of the United States in international standards fora, and preparation of technical information and reports for use by industry and government, on behalf of manufacturers of electronic products and providers of services to said manufacturers and consumers.

Dorothy B. Fountain, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-25846  Filed 11-19-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
RUSSIA ADOPTS LAW ON REGISTRATION OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY RIGHTS

----

**November 1997**
by Ethan S. Burger & Irina Paliashvili
A new Russian law "On the State Registration of Immovable Property Rights and RelatedTransactions," takes effect January 31, 1998 and is likely to improve the legal basis for investmentin Russian land, buildings, and other immovable property.  The law provides for the creation of asystem of reliable real estate records at a time when Russia's much-reduced inflation rate andincreased capital inflows are making loans more easily available for mortgages and projectfinance.
The new law provides that registration is the legal recognition and confirmation of the origin,limitation, transfer, or termination of rights to immovable property.  Registration is accomplishedby entry into a Unified State Register.  The unified register will be maintained at the regional ormunicipal level  by a designated local institution.  Such an institution may be a land committee,inventory bureau, or another body designated by the local government, but will be headed by aregistrar appointed by a federal governmental body with the consent of the relevant politicalsubdivision (i.e. subject).  Registration activities are limited to those specified by the registrationlaw.  A single federal body, probably the Federal Commission for Immovable Property andthe Appraisal of Immovable Property, will establish rules for the unified register and willoversee its establishment and operation by the local institutions. 
The new law replaces numerous partially-implemented presidential edicts; governmental decrees;and other federal, regional, and local normative acts that have sought to fill the gap in registrationrules until now.  The law is intended to introduce consistency into the non-uniform localregistration systems that have taken root throughout the country.  The law is to be self-financingthrough a fee system, a measure intended to reverse the current state of unreliable record-keepingthat has resulted from a lack of material resources and qualified personnel.  
**The Unified Register**
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-40760 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. H E M E R H E M E L I L O P E Z-GOMEZ, also known as Hermer Emeli Lopez-Gomez, also known as Lomeli Perez-Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant

A ppeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:12-CR-156-1
Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defende r a p p o i n t e d t o r epresent Hemer H emeli LopezGomez has moved for leave t o withdraw and has filed a brief i n accordance with Anders v. C

alifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United S tates v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lopez-Gomez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief a nd the relevant portions of the record reflected therei n . We

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no n onfrivolous issue U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D April 16, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R
. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R
. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 12-40760 Document: 00512210093 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/16/2013No. 12-40760

for ap p e l l a t e r eview. A ccordingly, counsel’s motion for leave t o withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further r e s p o n sibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 12-40760 Document: 00512210093 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/16/2013
Buried Piping and Tanks Inter

Staff Guidance

Eric Blocher

April 4, 2012
Key Considerations

 Inspection categories based exclusively on 

materials may result in over-selection of low non-safety related piping

 Cathodic protection OE review is not consist

with RG 1.188/NEI 95-10

 Cathodic protection Cathodic protection

– Adequate protection tied to the NACE standard

annual surveys and deviations greater than 90 

– Effect of not meeting survey criteria on categor– Recommend considering corrective action proc

repair activities and work management proces
Key Considerations

 Inspections should be based on per-site 

rather than per-unit

 Clarify inspection requirements for pipin

backfilled with controlled low strength m

– Recommend top surface only

 Recommend buried component coatings b

Recommend buried component coatings b

evaluated by a trained coatings inspector. example:

– EPRI Buried Pipe Condition Assessment a

Repair and

– EPRI Comprehensive Coatings Training Co
Comment Status

 NEI letter requesting extension of com

period to April 23, 2012

– Concurrent activities

 Status?
§ 905.3 Access to information. Information collected by a voluntary fishery data collector: ( a ) Is subject to disclosure to both the Secretary and the public, to the extent required or authorized by law; and
( b ) Is subject to discovery by any party to an enforcement proceeding, to the extent required or authorized by law.
### §4302. Adjustment of threshold amount of covered contract

Effective on October 1 of each year that is divisible by 5, the amount set forth in section 4301(2) of this title shall be adjusted to the equivalent amount in constant fiscal year 1994 dollars. An adjusted amount that is not evenly divisible by $50,000 shall be rounded to the nearest multiple of $50,000. If an amount is evenly divisible by $25,000 but is not evenly divisible by $50,000, the amount shall be rounded to the next higher multiple of $50,000.

(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3784.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 4302 | 41:256(l)(2). | June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title III, §306(l)(2), as added Pub. L. 100–700, §8(a)(1), Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4634; Pub. L. 103–355, title II, §2151, Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3315. |

Section
§ 930.81 Multiple permit review. ( a ) A person submitting a consistency certification for federal license or permit activities described in detail in an OCS plan is strongly encouraged to work with other Federal agencies in an effort to include, for consolidated State agency review, consistency certifications and supporting data and information applicable to OCS-related federal license or permit activities affecting any coastal use or resource which are not required to be described in detail in OCS plans but which are subject to State agency consistency review (e.g., Corps of Engineer permits for the placement of structures on the OCS and for dredging and the transportation of dredged material, Environmental Protection Agency air and water quality permits for offshore operations and onshore support and processing facilities). In the event the person does not consolidate such OCS-related permit activities with the State agency's review of the OCS plan, such activities will remain subject to individual State agency review under the requirements of subpart D of this part.
( b ) A State agency objection to one or more of the OCS-related federal license or permit activities submitted for consolidated review shall not prevent the person from receiving Federal agency approval: ( 1 ) For those OCS-related license or permit activities found by the State agency to be consistent with the management program; and
( 2 ) For the license or permit activities described in detail in the OCS plan provided the State agency concurs with the consistency certification for such plan. Similarly, a State agency objection to the consistency certification for an OCS plan shall not prevent the person from receiving Federal agency approval for those OCS-related license or permit activities determined by the State agency to be consistent with the management program.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Prime Sun Power Inc. on Form 10-Q for
      the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gerald Sullivan, Acting
      Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




November
      19, 2008


By:
            /s/
                Gerald SullivanName:Gerald
                SullivanTitle:Acting
                Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
                Officer
§ 9301.7 Definitions. For purposes of this subpart: ( a ) *Commercial use request* means a request from or on behalf of a person who seeks information for a use or purpose that furthers the requester's or other person's commercial, trade, or profit interests.
( b ) *Direct costs* means those costs incurred in searching for and duplicating (and, in the case of commercial use requests, reviewing) documents to respond to a FOIA request. Direct costs include, for example, salaries of employees who perform the work and costs of conducting large-scale computer searches.
( c ) *Duplicate* means to copy records to respond to a FOIA request. Copies can take the form of paper, audio-visual materials, or electronic records, among others.
( d ) *Educational institution* means a preschool, a public or private elementary or secondary school, an institution of graduate higher education, an institution of undergraduate higher education, an institution of professional education, and an institution of vocational education, that operates a program or programs of scholarly research.
( e ) *Fee category* means one of the three categories that agencies place requesters in for the purpose of determining whether a requester will be charged fees for search, review and duplication.
( f ) *Fee waiver* means the waiver or reduction of processing fees if a requester can demonstrate that certain statutory standards are satisfied.
( g ) *Non-commercial scientific institution* means an institution that is not operated on a commercial basis and that operates solely for the purpose of conducting scientific research the results of which are not intended to promote any particular product or industry.
( h ) *Representative of the news media* means any person or entity that gathers information of potential interest to a segment of the public, uses its editorial skills to turn the raw materials into a distinct work, and distributes that work to an audience.
( i ) *Review* means to examine a record to determine whether any portion of the record may be withheld and to process a record for disclosure, including by redacting it.
( j ) *Search for* means look for and retrieve records covered by a FOIA request, including by looking page-by-page or line-by-line to identify responsive material within individual records.
[77 FR 38172, June 27, 2012]
### §593. Protection for veterans preference employees

(a) Definitions.—In this section, the following definitions apply:

(1) Covered services.—The term "covered services" means any guard, elevator operator, messenger, or custodial services.

(2) Sheltered workshop.—The term "sheltered workshop" means a sheltered workshop employing the severely handicapped under chapter 85 of title 41.

(b) In General.—Except as provided in subsection (c), amounts made available to the General Services Administration pursuant to section 592 of this title may not be obligated or expended to procure covered services by contract if an employee who was a permanent veterans preference employee of the Administration on November 19, 1995, would be terminated as a result.

(c) Exception.—Amounts made available to the Administration pursuant to section 592 of this title may be obligated and expended to procure covered services by contract with a sheltered workshop or, if sheltered workshops decline to contract for the provision of covered services, by competitive contract for a period of no longer than 5 years. When a competitive contract expires, or is terminated for any reason, the Administration shall again offer to procure the covered services by contract with a sheltered workshop before procuring the covered services by competitive contract.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1120; Pub. L. 109–284, §6(6), Sept. 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 1212; Pub. L. 111–350, §5(l)(11), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3852.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 593 | 40:490c. | Pub. L. 104–52, title V, §503, Nov. 19, 1995, 109 Stat. 491. |

Section

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2011—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 111–350 substituted "chapter 85 of title 41" for "the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46 et seq.)".

2006—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 109–284 substituted "available to the General Services Administration" for "available to the Administration".