alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §14508. Economic and energy development initiative

(a) Projects To Be Assisted.—The Appalachian Regional Commission may provide technical assistance, make grants, enter into contracts, or otherwise provide amounts to persons or entities in the Appalachian region for projects and activities—

(1) to promote energy efficiency in the Appalachian region to enhance the economic competitiveness of the Appalachian region;

(2) to increase the use of renewable energy resources, particularly biomass, in the Appalachian region to produce alternative transportation fuels, electricity, and heat; and

(3) to support the development of regional, conventional energy resources to produce electricity and heat through advanced technologies that achieve a substantial reduction in emissions, including greenhouse gases, over the current baseline.

(b) Limitation on Available Amounts.—Of the cost of any activity eligible for a grant under this section, not more than—

(1) 50 percent may be provided from amounts appropriated to carry out this section;

(2) in the case of a project to be carried out in a county for which a distressed county designation is in effect under section 14526, 80 percent may be provided from amounts appropriated to carry out this section; or

(3) in the case of a project to be carried out in a county for which an at-risk county designation is in effect under section 14526, 70 percent may be provided from amounts appropriated to carry out this section.

(c) Sources of Assistance.—Subject to subsection (b), grants provided under this section may be provided from amounts made available to carry out this section in combination with amounts made available under other Federal programs or from any other source.

(d) Federal Share.—Notwithstanding any provision of law limiting the Federal share under any other Federal program, amounts made available to carry out this section may be used to increase that Federal share, as the Commission decides is appropriate.

(Added Pub. L. 110–371, §3(a), Oct. 8, 2008, 122 Stat. 4040.)
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 141 (Tuesday, July 23, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 44090]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-17671]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 770

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2011-0380; FRL-9393-9]
RIN 2070-AJ44

Formaldehyde; Third-Party Certification Framework for the 
Formaldehyde Standards for Composite Wood Products; Extension of 
Comment Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA issued a proposed rule in the Federal Register of June 10, 
2013, concerning a third-party certification framework for the 
formaldehyde standards for composite wood products. This document 
extends the comment period from August 9, 2013 to August 26, 2013. 
After receiving requests for an extension, EPA believes it is 
appropriate to extend the comment period in order to give stakeholders 
additional time to assess the impacts of the proposal, review technical 
documents in the docket, and prepare comments.

DATES: EPA is extending the comment date for a proposed rule published 
June 10, 2013 at 78 FR 34796. Comments, identified by docket 
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2011-0380, must be received on 
or before August 26, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Follow the detailed instructions as provided under ADDRESSES 
in the Federal Register document of June 10, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical information contact: 
Erik Winchester, National Program Chemicals Division (7404T), Office of 
Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: 
(202) 564-6450; email address: winchester.erik@epa.gov.
    For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill, 
422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202) 
554-1404; email address: TSCA-Hotline@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document extends the public comment 
period established in the Federal Register of June 10, 2013 (78 FR 
34796) (FRL-9342-4). EPA is hereby extending the comment period, which 
was set to end on August 9, 2013, to August 26, 2013.
    To submit comments, or access the docket, please follow the 
detailed instructions as provided under ADDRESSES in the June 10, 2013, 
Federal Register document. If you have questions, consult the technical 
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 770

    Environmental protection, Composite wood products, Formaldehyde, 
Reporting and recordkeeping, Third-party certification.

    Dated: July 17, 2013.
James Jones,
Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution 
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2013-17671 Filed 7-22-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
Exhibit 31.4



I, Leonard A. Campanaro, certify that:



|1) | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-K/A of Armstrong World Industries, Inc.;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3) | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                  |  |                                             
|----- |  | ---------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Date: |  | November 4, 2004 |  |                                             
|      |  |                  |  | /s/ Leonard A. Campanaro                    
|      |  |                  |  | Leonard A. Campanaro Chief Financial
Officer
4

M e m o r a n d u m

U n i t e d S t a t e s G o v e r n m e n t

L-2000-29

FORM 0-115f (1-92) 

R a i l r o a d R e t i r e m e n t B o a r d

OCT 0 6 2000

TO Catherine Leyser

Director of Assessment and Training

FROM Steven A. Ba 

General Corn

SUBJECT : Retirement Pension Plan of the North Carolina System’s

Teachers’ and State Employees’ Retirement System Pension 

Plan

This is in response to your memorandum dated June 5, 2000, requesting an 

^ opinion as to whether the above-referenced retirement plan (Plan) is a

supplemental pension plan within the meaning of section 2(h)(2) of the 

Railroad Retirement Act.

Section 216.42(a) of the Board’s regulations defines a supplemental pension 

plan as follows:

(a) What is a private railroad pension. * * * A private pension for 

purposes of this subpart is a plan that:

(1) Is a written plan or arrangement which is communicated 

to the employees to whom it applies;

(2) Is established and maintained by an employer for a 

defined group of employees; and

(3) Provides for the payment of definitely determinable 

benefits to employees over a period of years, usually for life, 

after retirement or disability. Such a plan is sometimes 

referred to as a defined benefit plan.

^ The Plan at issue is a written plan which is communicated to the employees to 

whom it applies. It covers employees described in Chapter 135-3 of the North 

Carolina Retirement Systems laws. The Plan is a defined contribution plan
- 2 -

Catherine Leyser

which is funded by both employee and employer contributions. The Plan 

provides for a regular payment of benefits to employees under a set formula 

with vesting rights. The Plan has definite provisions pertaining to 

contributions, creditable service, vesting, retirement age and benefits and has 

been approved by the Internal Revenue Service.

On the basis of my review of the documents provided with your inquiry, I

concur with your opinion that the above-described pension plan is a private 

pension within the meaning of section 2(h)(2) of the RRA and section 216.42 of 

the Board’s regulations. Consequently, benefits under the Plan will reduce the 

supplemental annuity to the extent benefits are based upon employer 

contributions.

AAArfa:

H:\MISC iuityl826.wpd

/ M / t o
#### § 326.1 What is the Fellowship Program?

The U.S. and Foreign Commercial Service Pilot Fellowship Program targets graduate students interested in increasing the level of knowledge and awareness of and employment with the Foreign Service, consistent with 22 U.S.C. 3905. The Program develops a source of trained individuals, from academic disciplines representing the skill needs of the Department, who are dedicated to representing the United States' commercial interests abroad.
Editorial Note on Part 15
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 15 appear at 62 FR 19669, Apr. 23, 1997.

§ 15.1 Scope and purpose. ( a ) This subpart sets forth the procedures to be followed when a summons or complaint is served on the Department, a component, or the Secretary or a Department employee in his or her official capacity.
( b ) This subpart is intended to ensure the orderly execution of the affairs of the Department and not to impede any legal proceeding.
( c ) This subpart does not apply to subpoenas. The procedures to be followed with respect to subpoenas are set out in subpart B.
( d ) This subpart does not apply to service of process made on a Department employee personally on matters not related to official business of the Department or to the official responsibilities of the Department employee.
[53 FR 41318, Oct. 21, 1988. Redesignated and amended at 62 FR 19669, 19670, Apr. 23, 1997]
#### In the Matter of Joseph Garafolo, Respondent, against Maurice Finkelstein et al., Constituting the Temporary City Housing Rent Commission of the City of New York, Appellants.

Nolan, P. J., Carswell,' Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur. [See *post,*p. 944.]'
#### § 280.326 Records and files of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

The records relating to fastener insignia shall be open to public inspection. Copies of any such records may be obtained upon request and payment of the fee set by the Director, USPTO.

[61 FR 50558, Sept. 26, 1996. Redesignated and amended at 65 FR 39803, 39804, June 28, 2000]
<PAGE>
                                                                   Page 24 of 24
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(h)

Key Bank USA, National Association        Deutsche Bank Trust Company
Americas
127 Public Square                           formally known as Bankers
Trust Company
Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1306                as Indenture Trustee
                                          280 Park Avenue, 9th Floor
                                          New York, New York 10017

JPMorgan Chase Bank
  formally known as Bank One, National Association
  as Eligible Lender Trustee
227 West Monroe, 26th Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60606

                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT
                      FOR KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 1999-B

We have examined management's assertion, included in its representation letter
dated March 2, 2004 that Key Bank USA, National Association (KBUSA), a wholly
owned subsidiary of KeyCorp, complied with sections 4.04, 4.08(a), 4.08(b),
4.08(c), 5.05, 5.06, 5.07 and 5.08 of the KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 1999-B Sale
and Servicing Agreement and sections 1.(a)(xx), 1.(b)(iii), 2 and 3 of the
KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 1999-B Administration Agreement (collectively, the
"Agreements") as of December 31, 2003 and for the year then ended. Management is
responsible for KBUSA's compliance with those requirements. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on management's assertion about KBUSA's compliance
based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about KBUSA's
compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances, except that in accordance with
Section 5.05 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement, our examination assumed the
accuracy of reports prepared by KBUSA's student loan processor. We believe that
our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination
does not provide a legal determination on KBUSA's compliance with the specified
requirements.

In our opinion, assuming the accuracy of reports prepared by KBUSA's student
loan processor, management's assertion that KBUSA complied with the
aforementioned requirements as of December 31, 2003 and for the year then ended
is fairly stated, in all material respects.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of KBUSA, Deutsche
Bank Trust Company Americas, and JPMorgan Chase Bank and is not intended to be
and should not be used by anyone other than for these specified parties.

                                                    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

March 2, 2004
Cleveland, Ohio
§ 28.200 Agency and legislative liaison. ( a ) The prohibition on the use of appropriated funds, in § 28.100 (a), does not apply in the case of a payment of reasonable compensation made to an officer or employee of a person requesting or receiving a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement if the payment is for agency and legislative liaison activities not directly related to a covered Federal action.
( b ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, providing any information specifically requested by an agency or Congress is allowable at any time.
( c ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the following agency and legislative liaison activities are allowable at any time only where they are not related to a specific solicitation for any covered Federal action: ( 1 ) Discussing with an agency (including individual demonstrations) the qualities and characteristics of the person's products or services, conditions or terms of sale, and service capabilities; and,
( 2 ) Technical discussions and other activities regarding the application or adaptation of the person's products or services for an agency's use.
( d ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the following agencies and legislative liaison activities are allowable only where they are prior to formal solicitation of any covered Federal action: ( 1 ) Providing any information not specifically requested but necessary for an agency to make an informed decision about initiation of a covered Federal action;
( 2 ) Technical discussions regarding the preparation of an unsolicited proposal prior to its official submission; and,
( 3 ) Capability presentations by persons seeking awards from an agency pursuant to the provisions of the Small Business Act, as amended by Public Law 95-507 and other subsequent amendments.
( e ) Only those activities expressly authorized by this section are allowable under this section.
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 19 (Tuesday, January 29, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 463]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00205]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Population Sciences and Epidemiology 
Integrated Review Group; Social Sciences and Population Studies A 
Study Section.
    Date: January 31, 2019.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Edgewater Hotel, 2411 Alaskan Way Pier 67, Seattle, WA 
98121.
    Contact Person: Suzanne Ryan, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 3139, MSC 7770, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-
1712, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#57252e3639243d1734242579393e3f79303821"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="27555e4649544d6744545509494e4f09404851">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in 
advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of 
December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research; 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 18, 2019.
Natasha M. Copeland,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-00205 Filed 1-28-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Supreme Court Cause No. DA 19
- 0678 SUNSET IRRIGATION DISTRICT, CHRISS MACK and CAROLYN MACK, , Claimants and Appellee s , v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE); GL ENDA F. ANDERSON, JIMMY A. ANDERSON, JOHN ANDERSON, and ROWDY ANDERSON

Objectors and Appellant s , **ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME** 

Pursuant to the Un opposed Motion of Claimants/Appellees Chriss Mack and Carolyn Mack for an

e xtension of time to file its Response Brief in the above

entitled case, the absence of any objection by the opposing party and in accordance with Montana Rule of A

ppellate Procedure 26( 2 ), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for filing and service of Claim ants/Appellees’ Response Brief is extended until September 15 , 2020. Dated this ____ day of September 2020.
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court cc: Raymond Tipp Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 4 2020

09/04/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0678
REGIONAL CORNER: BASHKORTOSTAN, RUSSIA

----

**February 1999**
by Alexander Gordienko
The Republic of Bashkortostan is located in the southern Urals along the boundary of Europe and Asia.  Its areais 143,600 sq. m. As of January 1, 1995, Bashkortostan had a population of 4 million people.  The capital is Ufa, with1.1 million residents. Other large cities include Sterlitamak (pop. 256,000) and Salavat (pop. 155,000).  Representativesof 70 nations and ethnic groups live in the Republic of Bashkortostan.  The urban population constitutes 65 percent ofthe total. Bashkortostan is a autonomous state under the jurisdiction of the Russian Federation. 
**Natural Resources**
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-4537

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

HUMBERTO VALLE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,

Chief District Judge. (CR-03-448)

Submitted: June 30, 2005 Decided: August 2, 2005

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David B. Freedman, WHITE & CRUMPLER, Winston-Salem, North Carolina,

for Appellant. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney, Sandra

J. Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Humberto Valle pled guilty to conspiracy to distribute

more than five kilograms of cocaine hydrochloride, in violation of

21 U.S.C. § 846 (2000). He was sentenced to the statutory

mandatory minimum term of 120 months of imprisonment. See 21

U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A) (2000). Valle appeals his sentence.

Valle argues that the district court erred in applying

the federal sentencing guidelines as mandatory in violation of

United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). Because Valle did

not object to his sentence in the district court on these grounds,

our review is for plain error. United States v. Hughes, 401 F.3d

540, 547 (4th Cir. 2005). To demonstrate plain error, Valle must

establish that error occurred, that it was plain, and that it

affected his substantial rights. Id. at 547-48. If a defendant

establishes these requirements, the court’s “discretion is

appropriately exercised only when failure to do so would result in

a miscarriage of justice, such as when the defendant is actually

innocent or the error seriously affects the fairness, integrity or

public reputation of judicial proceedings.” Id. at 555 (internal

quotation marks and citation omitted).

In United States v. White, 405 F.3d 208, 216-17 (4th Cir.

2005), we held that treating the guidelines as mandatory was error

and that the error was plain. However, in the absence of a Sixth

Amendment violation prejudice is not presumed, and the defendant
- 3 -

bears the burden of showing that the error in application of the

then-mandatory guidelines affected the outcome of the district

court proceedings. Id. at 223. We find Valle fails to meet this

burden because he was sentenced to the statutory mandatory minimum

term of imprisonment, and thus the mandatory application of the

guidelines had no effect on his actual sentence.

Accordingly, we affirm Valle’s conviction and sentence.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### SUBCHAPTER III—FUNDS