alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3508. Right to examine contractor records

For the purpose of evaluating the accuracy, completeness, and currency of cost or pricing data required to be submitted by this chapter, an executive agency shall have the authority provided by section 4706(b)(2) of this title.

(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3770.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3508 | 41:254b(g). | June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title III, §304A(g), as added Pub. L. 103–355, title I, §1251(a)(2), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3283. |

Section
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 21 (Thursday, January 31, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 775]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00355]



[[Page 775]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Interdisciplinary Molecular Sciences and 
Training Integrated Review Group; Cellular and Molecular 
Technologies Study Section.
    Date: February 20-21, 2019.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Admiral Fell Inn, 888 South Broadway, Baltimore, MD 
21231.
    Contact Person: Tatiana V. Cohen, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5213, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-
455-2364, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f88c998c91999699d69b97909d96b8969190d69f978e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="621603160b030c034c010d0a070c220c0b0a4c050d14">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 25, 2019.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-00355 Filed 1-30-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### §605. Searching vessels for letters

An officer or employee of the Postal Service performing duties related to the inspection of postal matters, when instructed by the Postal Service to make examinations and seizures, and any customs officer without special instructions shall search vessels for letters which may be on board, or which may have been conveyed contrary to law.

(Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 728.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1971, pursuant to Resolution No. 71–9 of the Board of Governors. See section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note preceding section 101 of this title.
Choosing anOrganizational Form for Your Russian Business

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 24 (Thursday, February 5, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5514-5515]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2497]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army

Intent To Grant an Exclusive or Partially Exclusive License to 
Fiber Glass Industries, Incorporated

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with 37 CFR Part 404 et seq., the Department of 
the Army hereby gives notice of its intent to grant to Fiber Glass 
Industries, Incorporated, a corporation having its principle place of 
business at 69 Edson Street, Amsterdam, New York 12010, an exclusive or 
partially exclusive license relative to an ARL patent application (U.S. 
Patent Application 10/318667; ``Methods for Producing Nano-
Textured Solid Surfaces'', Jensen; et al.).

[[Page 5515]]

DATES: File written objections by April 5, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael D. Rausa, U.S. Army Research 
Laboratory, Office of Research and Technology Applications, ATTN: 
AMSRL-DP-T/Bldg. 459, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005-5425, 
Telephone: (410) 278-5028.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Anyone wishing to object to the granting of 
this license has 60 days from the date of this notice to file written 
objections along with supporting evidence, if any.

Luz D. Ortiz,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-2497 Filed 2-4-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 14, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Composite Panel Association (“CPA”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: Composite Panel Association, Gaithersburg, MD. The nature and scope of CPA's standards development activities are: Increasing acceptance and use of composite panel products (products made from composite wood and allied materials) and educating users about their benefits. CPA represents the composite panel industry on technical, environmental, quality assurance and product acceptance issues.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-25831  Filed 11-19-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
# L_2020039EN.01000101.xml

| 12.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 39/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 39/1

---

Information concerning the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the United Mexican States on certain aspects of air services

The Agreement between the European Union and the United Mexican States on certain aspects of air services, signed in Brussels on 15 December 2010, entered into force on 22 June 2012, in accordance with Article 7(1) of the Agreement, as the last notification was deposited on 23 May 2012.

---
TAKING THE FIRST STEPS

----
Order entered August 10, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00537-CV

JOSEPH ASHMORE, JR., ALLAN CLARK AND FINANCIAL RISK SPECIALISTS, 

INC., Appellants

V.

JMS CONSTRUCTION, INC. AND DAVID PERLEY, Appellees

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-10-13260

ORDER

We GRANT court reporter Stephanie S. Moses’s August 6, 2015 request for extension of 

time to file the reporter’s record and ORDER the record be filed no later than September 7, 

2015. 

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of General Medical Sciences Special Emphasis Panel Review of NIGMS ESI MIRA Grant Applications.                    

*Date:*                         April 5, 2019.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military Road NW, Washington, DC 20015.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ruth S. Grossman, DDS, Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, Room 3AN12J, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-3998,                         *grossmanrs@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, Special Minority Initiatives; 93.859, Biomedical Research and Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 19, 2018.

Melanie J. Pantoja,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2018-28019 Filed 12-26-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
|  |
|--|
|  |  |  | Search This Site |
|  |  |  |  |

|  |  |  | Library Gateway    •             CU Library Catalog    •    Ask         A Librarian
 Daily Haiku
 Credits
 Site Requirements      Mann Library, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 |
|--|--|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
### §3176. Administrator of General Services to furnish services in continental United States to international bodies

Sections 1535 and 1536 of title 31 are extended so that the Administrator of General Services, at the request of the Secretary of State, may furnish services in the continental United States, on a reimbursable basis, to any international body with which the Federal Government is affiliated.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1156.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3176 | 40:298b. | June 16, 1949, ch. 218, title IV, §405, 63 Stat. 199. |

Section

The words "Sections 1535 and 1536 of title 31" are substituted for "section 601 of the Economy Act, approved June 30, 1932, as amended" because of section 4(b) of the Act of September 13, 1982 (Public Law 97–258, 96 Stat. 1067), the first section of which enacted Title 31, United States Code. The words "Administrator of General Services" are substituted for "Public Buildings Administration" because of section 103(a) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (ch. 288, 63 Stat. 380), which is restated as section 303(c) [303(b)] of the revised title. The words "Secretary of State" are substituted for "State Department" because of 22:2651.
§ 286.7 Evaluation process. ( a ) Each applicant requesting to be evaluated under NVCASE is expected to initiate the process and assume designated responsibilities as NIST proceeds with its evaluation: ( 1 ) *Application.* The applicant completes and submit a request to be evaluated.
( 2 ) *Fee.* The applicant submits a partial payment with the application and agrees to submit the remaining balance based on evaluation costs as a condition for satisfactory completion of the process.
( 3 ) *Documentation.* The applicant operates a system and procedures that meet the applicable generic requirements and specific criteria. Relevant documentation submitted with the application is reviewed by NIST.
( 4 ) *On-site assessment.* The applicant and NIST cooperate in the scheduling and conduct of all necessary on-site evaluations, including the resolution of any deficiencies cited.
( 5 ) *Final review.* The applicant provides any supplementary materials requested by NIST, then NIST completes the review and decides on appropriate action.
( b ) NIST may take one of the following actions with regard to an applicant: ( 1 ) *Certificate.* If an applicant fully demonstrates conformity with all program requirements and specific criteria, NIST issues a certificate documenting this finding. Each certificate is accompanied by a document describing the specific scope of the accreditation or recognition.
( 2 ) *Denial.* If an applicant cannot demonstrate conformity with all program requirements and specific criteria, NIST may deny award of the certificate. An applicant who has failed to complete the evaluation satisfactorily may reapply when prepared to demonstrate full conformance with program requirements.
#### Ward Graves, Respondent, *v.*Thomas Dorsey, Appellant.

First Department,

January 29, 1952.

*340
      *Lee V. Eastman*of counsel *(Lawrence B. Simons*with him on the brief; *Spring & Eastman,*attorneys), for appellant.

*Charles Henry*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Under the court’s charge the plaintiff could not prevail without proof that the defendant accepted a bribe of $3,000 to repudiate the contract. In the absence of objection the charge became the law of the case in this respect. The evidence entirely failed to establish the acceptance of such bribe. In fact, the plaintiff conceded that he had no proof on that subject, except mere rumor in the trade. Accordingly, and because the evidence as a whole failed to establish any malicious interference with the plaintiff’s contract on the part of the defendant, the judgment should be reversed, with costs of this appeal to the appellant and the complaint dismissed, and judgment directed to be entered dismissing the complaint herein, with costs.

Shientag, J.

(dissenting in part). I dissent in part and vote to reverse and to order a new trial. The plaintiff failed to make out the cause of action alleged in his complaint. Neither the granting of the “ conventional ” motion to conform the pleadings to the proof nor the Judge’s charge purported to deal with any alleged willful, malicious conduct of the defendant other than that specifically charged in the complaint. In the interests of justice, however, the plaintiff should have the opportunity of amending his complaint properly and proceeding to a new trial in accordance therewith.

Peck, P. J., Glennon, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ., concur in *Per Curiam*opinion; Shientag, J., dissents in part, in opinion.

Judgment reversed, with costs of this appeal to the appellant and the complaint dismissed, and judgment is directed to be entered dismissing the complaint herein, with costs. Settle order on notice.
### [§§734 to 736. Repealed. Pub. L. 115–41, title I, §102(a)(1), June 23, 2017, 131 Stat. 865]

Section 734, added Pub. L. 114–223, div. A, title II, §247(a)(1), Sept. 29, 2016, 130 Stat. 888, related to evaluation criteria of supervisors and treatment of bonuses.

Section 735, added Pub. L. 114–223, div. A, title II, §247(a)(1), Sept. 29, 2016, 130 Stat. 889; amended Pub. L. 114–315, title VIII, §802(1), Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1591, related to training regarding whistleblower complaints. See section 733 of this title.

Section 736, added Pub. L. 114–223, div. A, title II, §247(a)(1), Sept. 29, 2016, 130 Stat. 889, related to reports to Congress on whistleblower complaints.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Prior sections 740 to 763, 765 to 779, 781 to 788, and 801 to 806 were renumbered sections 1940 to 1963, 1965 to 1979, 1981 to 1988, and 2101 to 2106 of this title, respectively.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

CRYSTAL CULLIN, as Guardian of )

AMELIA PHILLIPS )

)

)

Plaintiff s

, )

v. )

) C .A. No.: N20C

- 04

- 194 FJJ

REGAL HEIGHTS HEALTH CARE )

AND REHAB CENTER, LLC, )

a Delaware corporation )

)

)

Defendants. )

ORDER REGARDING AFFIDAVIT OF MERIT CONCERNING

MEDICAL CARE PROVIDED TO PLAINTIFF BY DEFENDANT REGAL

HEIGHTS HEALTH CARE AND REHAB CENTER, LLC

.

This 23rd day of December , 2020, the Court has reviewed in camera

Plaintiff’s affidavit of merit pursuant to 18 Del.C. § 6853(a)(1) 6853(d). Having

done so, the Court finds:

1. The affidavit of merit is signed by an expert witness.

2. The affidavit is accompanied by a current curriculum vitae of the expert

witness.

3. The affid avit contain s an opinion of the expert witness that there are

reasonable grounds to believe that the applicable standard of care was breached b y

Defendant Regal Heights Health Care and Rehab Center (“Defendant”), and that thebreach of the applicable stand ard of care by Defendant was the proximate cause of

the injuries claimed in the Complaint.

4. The curriculum vitae accompanying the affidavi t establishes tha t the

expert witness i s licensed to practice nursing in the state of Connecticut, that the

expert witness has been a certified legal nursing consultant as of the date of the

affidavit for the three (3) years immediately preceding the alleged negligent acts

described in the Complaint, and has been engaged in the treatment of patients and/or

in the teaching/academic side of nursing in the same of simil ar field as the named

Defendant within the last three (3) years.

Based on the foregoing, the Court finds that the affidavit of merit complies

with the requirements of 18 Del.C. §6853(a)(1) and 18 Del.C. §6853(c).

IT IS SO ORDERED.



## /s/ Francis F. Jones, Jr.

Francis F. Jones, Jr., Judge

cc: File&ServeXpress
B.C.D. 10-47

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION AUG 1 7 2010

BNSF Acquisition, Inc. (BAI)

BNSF Railway Company (BNSF)

This is a determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning the

continued status of the BNSF Acquisition, Inc. (BAI) as an employer under the

Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231 et sea.KRRA) and the Railroad

Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. § 351 et sea.KRUIA). Previously, BNSF

Acquisition had been determined to be covered under the Acts effective

December 4, 1996.

The latest coverage information in the file for BAI indicates that the Secretary of

State for the State of Delaware approved a merger of BAI into Burlington

Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) on March 18, 2008. BAI and BNSF provided the

certificate of merger and a consolidated Federal Income Tax Return for the year

ending December 31,2008. The Tax Form indicates the date of merger

(February 29, 2008) and details the assets transferred to BNSF from BAI.

Information in the file regarding this merger has been provided by research from

the Audit and Compliance Division of the Railroad Retirement Board after BAI

contacted Audit and Compliance to inform the agency that BAI was no longer

an entity. All shares of BAI were cancelled as a result of the merger. Upon the

date of merger, BNSF assumed all responsibility for debts, obligations, and duties

of BAI and acquired all of BAI’s assets.

Section 202.11 (20 CFR 202.11) of the Board's regulations states that:

The employer status of any company or person shall terminate whenever

such company or person loses any of the characteristics essential to the

existence of an employer status.

As indicated above, information in our coverage files indicates that BAI served

as a covered employer from its date of inception to the date the merger

occurred, February 29, 2008. The evidence of record establishes that BAI has 

not functioned as a separate entity since the date of the merger and no longer

possess the characteristics of an employer. The Board therefore finds that

BA # 3669
2

effective February 29, 2008, the date BNSF Acquisition, Inc., merged with BNSF,

BAI ceased to be a covered employer under the Railroad Retirement and

Railroad Unemployment Insurance Acts.

Yh^. Speakman

^7

Zerome F. Kever
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Robert Biersack, Acting Press Officer, Telephone (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 04-25646  Filed 11-15-04; 2:38 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M