alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with Amendment No. 2 to the Quarterly Report of Prime Sun Power
      Inc.
      on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gerald Sullivan,
      Acting Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge
      that:




(1)  
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)  
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




October
      9, 2008


By:
            /s/
                Gerald SullivanName:Gerald
                SullivanTitle:Acting
                Principal Executive Officer and
              Principal Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 17, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 67361]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25545]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Law Enforcement Training Center


Notice of meeting

AGENCY: Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC), Department of 
Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee to the National Center for State and 
Local Law Enforcement Training (National Center) at the Federal Law 
Enforcement Training Center will meet on December 1, 2004, beginning at 
8 a.m.

ADDRESSES: Federal Law Enforcement Training Center, 1131 Chapel 
Crossing Road, Glynco, GA 31524.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reba Fischer, Designated Federal 
Officer, National Center for State and Local Law Enforcement Training, 
Federal Law Enforcement Training Center, Glynco, GA 31524, 912-267-
2343, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e694838487c8808f95858e8394a6828e95c8818990"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="33415651521d555a40505b564173575b401d545c45">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The agenda for this meeting includes remarks 
by the Committee Co-Chairs, Randy Beardsworth, Director of Operations, 
Border and Transportation Security, Department of Homeland Security, 
and Deborah Daniels, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Justice 
Programs, Department of Justice; an update on current training 
initiatives of the National Center; and planning of strategic goals. 
This meeting is open to the public. Anyone desiring to attend must 
contact Reba Fischer, the Designated Federal Officer, no later than 
November 20, 2004, at (912) 267-2343, to arrange clearance. This 
meeting was originally scheduled for September 14, 2004, but was 
cancelled due to Hurricane Ivan.

    Dated: November 5, 2004.
Stanley Moran,
Director, National Center for State and Local Law Enforcement Training.
[FR Doc. 04-25545 Filed 11-12-04; 4:32 pm]
BILLING CODE 4810-32-U


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 240.3 Permissible sizes.

Lime in barrels shall be packed only in barrels containing 280 pounds or 180 pounds, net weight. For the purposes of this section the word “barrel” is defined as a cylindrical or approximately cylindrical vessel, cask or drum.

(Sec. 2, 39 Stat. 530; 15 U.S.C. 238)
§ 27.115 IRB Records. ( a ) An institution, or when appropriate an IRB, shall prepare and maintain adequate documentation of IRB activities, including the following: ( 1 ) Copies of all research proposals reviewed, scientific evaluations, if any, that accompany the proposals, approved sample consent forms, progress reports submitted by investigators, and reports of injuries to subjects.
( 2 ) Minutes of IRB meetings, which shall be in sufficient detail to show attendance at the meetings; actions taken by the IRB; the vote on these actions including the number of members voting for, against, and abstaining; the basis for requiring changes in or disapproving research; and a written summary of the discussion of controverted issues and their resolution.
( 3 ) Records of continuing review activities, including the rationale for conducting continuing review of research that otherwise would not require continuing review as described in § 27.109(f)(1).
( 4 ) Copies of all correspondence between the IRB and the investigators.
( 5 ) A list of IRB members in the same detail as described in § 27.108(a)(2).
( 6 ) Written procedures for the IRB in the same detail as described in § 27.108(a)(3) and (4).
( 7 ) Statements of significant new findings provided to subjects, as required by § 27.116(c)(5).
( 8 ) The rationale for an expedited reviewer's determination under § 27.110(b)(1)(i) that research appearing on the expedited review list described in § 27.110(a) is more than minimal risk.
( 9 ) Documentation specifying the responsibilities that an institution and an organization operating an IRB each will undertake to ensure compliance with the requirements of this policy, as described in § 27.103(e).
( b ) The records required by this policy shall be retained for at least 3 years, and records relating to research that is conducted shall be retained for at least 3 years after completion of the research. The institution or IRB may maintain the records in printed form, or electronically. All records shall be accessible for inspection and copying by authorized representatives of the Federal department or agency at reasonable times and in a reasonable manner.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under Control Number 0990-0260)
Editorial Note on Part 922
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

§ 922.153 Permit procedures and criteria. ( a ) A person may conduct an activity prohibited by § 922.152(a)(2) through (8) if conducted in accordance with the scope, purpose, terms and conditions of a permit or ONMS authorization issued under this section and subpart D of this part.
( b ) Applications for such permits or ONMS authorizations should be addressed to the Director, Office of National Marine Sanctuaries; ATTN: Superintendent, Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary, 115 E Railroad Ave., Suite 301, Port Angeles, WA 98362.
( c ) The Director shall obtain the express written consent of the governing body of an Indian tribe prior to issuing a permit, if the proposed activity involves or affects resources of cultural or historical significance to the tribe.
( d ) Removal or attempted removal of any Indian cultural resource or artifact may only occur with the express written consent of the governing body of the tribe or tribes to which such resource or artifact pertains, and certification by the Director that such activities occur in a manner that minimizes damage to the biological and archeological resources. Prior to permitting entry onto a significant cultural site designated by a tribal governing body, the Director shall require the express written consent of the governing body of the tribe or tribes to which such cultural site pertains.
( e ) Where the issuance or denial of a permit is requested by the governing body of a Washington Coast treaty tribe, the Director shall consider and protect the interests of the tribe to the fullest extent practicable in keeping with the purposes of the Sanctuary and his or her fiduciary duties to the tribe.
[88 FR 969, Jan. 6, 2023]
Kodiak Energy, Inc.





EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual Report of Kodiak Energy, Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








Dated:  April 13, 2011




/s/  William S. Tighe


Name: William S. Tighe


Title: Chief Executive Officer











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Finlay Straus, Inc., et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Respondents, v. University of the State of New York et al., Appellants.

Hill, P. J., Crapser and Bliss, JJ., concur; Heffernan, J., dissents in memorandum in which Sehenck, J., concurs. Heffernan, J. (dissenting). I dissent. Defendants have appealed from an order of the Albany *1043Special Term of the Supreme Court granting plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary injunction pending the trial of the action in which it is sought to obtain a judgment declaring rules 6, 7 and 8 of the Board of Regents relating to the practice of optometry *ultra vires.*The plaintiffs are domestic corporations engaged in the business of selling jewelry and kindred goods in 19 stores in the city of New York. In their several stores they have retained the services of licensed optometrists who examine the eyes of customers and prescribe corrective lenses. The customer is billed through the corporation and pays one fee which includes the cost of examination, the lenses and the frames. The fee is paid to the corporation and not to the optometrist who is merely its employee. The rules which are attacked have no application to plaintiffs and apply solely to optometrists. There is nothing in these rules to prevent plaintiffs from carrying on an advertising campaign in connection with the sale of optometry goods as merchandise on prescription. Not only do these rules not apply to plaintiffs but no notice required by such rules has ever been given to any of plaintiffs’ employees. Defendants have not threatened plaintiffs with the institution of any action and hence there is nothing which the court may enjoin. It is quite apparent that plaintiffs are not the real parties in interest in this suit because on no theory have they a cause of action against defendants. There is nothing in the complaint to indicate that plaintiffs are entitled to a judgment against defendants restraining the commission or continuance of any act. It seems to me that the temporary injunction was improvidently granted and that the order should be reversed and the motion denied.
§ 831.302 Unused sick leave. ( a ) For annuity computation purposes, the service of an employee who retires on immediate annuity or dies leaving a survivor entitled to annuity is increased by the days of unused sick leave to his credit under a formal leave system.
( b ) An immediate annuity is one which begins to accrue not later than 1 month after the employee is separated.
( c ) A formal leave system is one which is provided by law or regulation or operates under written rules specifying a group or class of employees to which it applies and the rate at which sick leave is earned.
( d ) In general, 8 hours of unused sick leave increases total services by 1 day. In cases where more or less than 8 hours of sick leave would be charged for a day's absence, total service is increased by the number of days in the period between the date of separation and the date that the unused sick leave would have expired had the employee used it (except that holidays falling within the period are treated as work days, and no additional leave credit is earned for that period).
( e ) If an employee's tour of duty changes from part time to full time or full time to part time within 180 days before retirement, the credit for unused sick leave is computed as though no change had occurred.
[34 FR 17617, Oct. 31, 1969]
### §6135. Parades, assemblages, and display of flags in the Supreme Court Building and grounds

It is unlawful to parade, stand, or move in processions or assemblages in the Supreme Court Building or grounds, or to display in the Building and grounds a flag, banner, or device designed or adapted to bring into public notice a party, organization, or movement.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1183.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6135 | 40:13k. | Aug. 18, 1949, ch. 479, §6, 63 Stat. 617. |

Section
§ 784.5 Subsidiary arrangements. ( a ) *General subsidiary arrangement.* The United States Government may conclude a general subsidiary arrangement with the IAEA that governs complementary access activities, irrespective of the location (i.e., an arrangement that is not location-specific).
( b ) *Location-specific subsidiary arrangement* — ( 1 ) *Purpose.* If requested by the location or deemed necessary by the U.S. Government, the U.S. Government will negotiate a location-specific subsidiary arrangement with the IAEA. The purpose of such an arrangement is to establish procedures for conducting managed access at a specific declared location. If the location requests, it may participate in preparations for the negotiation of a location-specific subsidiary arrangement with the IAEA and may observe the negotiations to the maximum extent practicable. The existence of a location-specific subsidiary arrangement does not in any way limit the right of the owner, operator, occupant, or agent in charge of the location to withhold consent to a request for complementary access.
( 2 ) *Format and content.* The form and content of a location-specific subsidiary arrangement will be determined by the IAEA and the U.S. Government, in consultation with the location, on a case-by-case basis.
### §18301. Findings and purposes

(a) Findings.—Congress finds that—

(1) affordable public transportation is essential to the economic vitality of the national capital area and is an essential component of regional efforts to improve air quality to meet environmental requirements and to improve the health of both residents of and visitors to the national capital area as well as to preserve the beauty and dignity of the Nation's capital;

(2) use of mass transit by both residents of and visitors to the national capital area is substantially affected by the prices charged for mass transit services, prices that are substantially affected by labor costs, since more than two-thirds of operating costs are attributable to labor costs;

(3) labor costs incurred in providing mass transit in the national capital area have increased at an alarming rate and wages and benefits of operators and mechanics currently are among the highest in the Nation;

(4) higher operating costs incurred for public transit in the national capital area cannot be offset by increasing costs to patrons, since this often discourages ridership and thus undermines the public interest in promoting the use of public transit;

(5) spiraling labor costs cannot be offset by the governmental entities that are responsible for subsidy payments for public transit services since local governments generally, and the District of Columbia government in particular, are operating under severe fiscal constraints;

(6) imposition of mandatory standards applicable to arbitrators resolving arbitration disputes involving interstate compact agencies operating in the national capital area will ensure that wage increases are justified and do not exceed the ability of transit patrons and taxpayers to fund the increase; and

(7) federal legislation is necessary under section 8 of Article I of the United States Constitution to balance the need to moderate and lower labor costs while maintaining industrial peace.

(b) Purpose.—The purpose of this chapter is to adopt standards governing arbitration that must be applied by arbitrators resolving disputes involving interstate compact agencies operating in the national capital area in order to lower operating costs for public transportation in the Washington metropolitan area.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1291.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 18301 | 40:1301. | Pub. L. 104–50, title IV, §402, Nov. 15, 1995, 109 Stat. 463. |

Section

In subsection (a)(7), the reference is to section 8 of article I of the United States Constitution to correct an error in the source provision.
#### § 1500.8 Department.

*Department* means the United States Department of Commerce.
### Part D—Industrial Energy Efficiency
§ 848.202 Working percentage and officially established hours for phased employment. ( a ) For the purpose of this subpart, *working percentage* means the percentage of full-time equivalent employment equal to the quotient obtained by dividing— ( 1 ) The number of officially established hours per pay period to be worked by a phased retiree, as described in paragraph (b) of this section; by
( 2 ) The number of hours per pay period to be worked by an employee serving in a comparable position on a full-time basis.
( b ) The number of officially established hours per pay period to be worked by an employee in phased retirement status must equal one-half the number of hours the phased retiree would have been scheduled to work had the phased retiree remained in a full-time work schedule and not elected to enter phased retirement status. These hours make up the officially established part-time work schedule of the phased retiree and exclude any additional hours worked under § 848.205(j).
Proposed Rule: Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions 

Meeting Documentation Kinder Morgan 12/15/09 

Date Staff Contact Information Name of Organization Summary of Discussion Written Comments 

Provided? 

Did they also submit to 

Docket? 

Date 

sent to 

EPACCD 

12/15/09 Barbora Master 

Lisa Bacanskas 

Bill Wehrum (Hunton & 

Williams) 

R. Tim Bradley (Kinder 

Morgan) 

Among the issues: geologic 

sequestration, enhanced oil 

recovery, emissions, CO2 supply
§ 970.500 General. ( a ) *Proposal.* After certification of an application pursuant to Subpart D of this part, the Administrator will proceed with a proposal to issue or transfer a license for the exploration activities described in the application.
( b ) ( 1 ) *Terms, conditions and restrictions.* Within 180 days (or such longer period as the Administrator may establish for good cause shown in writing) after certification, the Administrator will propose terms and conditions for, and restrictions on, the proposed exploration which are consistent with the provisions of the Act and this part as set forth in §§ 970.517 through 970.524. Proposed and final terms, conditions and restrictions will be uniform in all licenses, except to the extent that differing physical and environmental conditions require the establishment of special terms, conditions and restrictions for the conservation of natural resources, protection of the environment, or the safety of life and property at sea. The Administrator will propose these in writing to the applicant. Also, public notice thereof will be provided pursuant to § 970.501, and they will be included with the draft of the EIS on the issuance of a license which is required by section 109(d) of the Act.
( 2 ) If the Administrator does not propose terms, conditions and restrictions within 180 days after certification, he will notify the applicant in writing of the reasons for the delay and will indicate the approximate date on which the proposed terms, conditions and restrictions will be completed.
( c ) *Findings.* Before issuing or transferring an exploration license, the Administrator must make written findings in accordance with the requirements of §§ 970.503 through 970.507. These findings will be made after considering all information submitted with respect to the application and proposed issuance or transfer. He will make a final determination on issuance or transfer of a license, and will publish a final EIS on that action, within 180 days (or such longer period of time as he may establish for good cause shown in writing) following the date on which proposed terms, conditions and restrictions, and the draft EIS, are published.
### §704. Other methods of disposal

(a) In General.—Foreign excess property not disposed of under section 702 or 703 of this title may be disposed of as provided in this section.

(b) Methods of Disposal.—

(1) Sale, exchange, lease, or transfer.—The head of an executive agency may dispose of foreign excess property by sale, exchange, lease, or transfer, for cash, credit or other property, with or without warranty, under terms and conditions the head of the executive agency considers proper.

(2) Exchange for foreign currency or credit.—If the head of an executive agency determines that it is in the interest of the United States, foreign excess property may be exchanged for—

(A) foreign currencies or credits; or

(B) substantial benefits or the discharge of claims resulting from the compromise or settlement of claims in accordance with law.

(3) Abandonment, destruction, or donation.—The head of an executive agency may authorize the abandonment, destruction, or donation of foreign excess property if the property has no commercial value or if estimated costs of care and handling exceed the estimated proceeds from sale.

(c) Advertising.—The head of an executive agency may dispose of foreign excess property without advertising if the head of the executive agency finds that disposal without advertising is the most practicable and advantageous means for the Federal Government to dispose of the property.

(d) Transfer of Title.—The head of an executive agency may execute documents to transfer title or other interests in, and take other action necessary or proper to dispose of, foreign excess property.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1126.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 704 | 40:512(a). | June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title IV, §402(a), 63 Stat. 398; Pub. L. 91–426, §2(a)–(c), Sept. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 883; Pub. L. 99–627, §3(a), Nov. 7, 1986, 100 Stat. 3509. |

Section
#### Vitacrescenza Summo, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. Snare & Triest Company and Steel and Masonry Contracting Company, Appellants.

Motion denied. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ.
BISNIS ROUNDTABLE WITH CENTRAL ASIAN PRESIDENT

----

**November 1997**
On October 2, President Emomali Rakhmonov of Tajikistan met with more than 90 U.S. companyrepresentatives during a business roundtable sponsored by BISNIS at the Department ofCommerce.  
President Rakhmonov presented an overview of his country's industrial-economic climate andexpressed his desire to see further U.S.-Tajik economic cooperation. Rakhmonov also highlightedthat with the signing of the Tajik Peace Accords with the Tajik opposition, the potential forgrowth is tremendous in the areas of private enterprise, the labor force, and agricultural andindustrial resources.  
This was the fourth presidential roundtable BISNIS has facilitated this year to bring U.S.companies together with a visiting NIS leader.
***This report is provided courtesy of the Business Information Service for the NewlyIndependent States (BISNIS)***
Confidential  

Polymer  

Weight  

Information