alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. IV-11-009 

Contact: Victor Dricks (817) 860-8128

 Lara Uselding (817) 276-6519 

 March 29, 2011 

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

NRC TO DISCUSS 2010 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FOR

WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet in Burlington, Kan., on April 5,

with representatives of Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corp. to discuss the agency's 2010

assessment of safety performance for the Wolf Creek nuclear plant.

The meeting, which will be open to the public, is scheduled to begin at 6 p.m. at the

Coffey County Library, Burlington Branch, 410 Juniatta Street in Burlington.

In addition to the performance assessment, the NRC staff will be available to answer

questions from the public on the safety performance of Wolf Creek, as well as the NRC's role in

ensuring safe plant operation.

"The NRC continually reviews the performance of Wolf Creek and the nation's other

commercial nuclear power facilities," NRC Region IV Administrator Elmo E. Collins said. "This

meeting will provide an opportunity for a discussion of our annual assessment of safety

performance with the company and with local officials and residents who live near the plant."

A letter sent from the NRC Region IV office to plant officials addresses the performance

of the plant during 2010 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on

the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/wc_2010q4.pdf.

The NRC said the Wolf Creek plant operated safely during 2010. However, the plant is 

receiving heightened oversight from the NRC because of exceeding performance thresholds in 

the frequency of unplanned shutdowns and unplanned shutdowns with complications as well as 

safety system functional failures. Also, despite efforts by the licensee, weaknesses remain in the 

area of problem identification and resolution and human performance and the NRC will continue 

to focus inspection attention on these areas. 

Inspections are performed by NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant and by 

specialists from the Region IV Office in Arlington, Texas.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125

Telephone: (817) 860-8128

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov
Information about the plant’s current performance is available at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/WC/wc_chart.html.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.
316B PHASE III RULE

TELEPHONE LOG

Name of Caller: John Sunda, SAIC

Date: June 10, 2008

Company Name: Blue Stream Services

Street Address:

City/State/ZIP: New Iberia, LA

Person Contacted: Richard Brister

Title: Cooling Tower Specialist

Telephone #: 504-400-0093

E-Mail: rabrister@bellsouth.net 

 

Called to inquire further about technical requirements and costs of modular cooling towers.

He has previously sent me modular 3,000 ton tower monthly rental costs for a minimum of 4 

months/yr. The intent is to provide supplemental cooling or flow volume to plants that need it for 

only a portion of the year – often just 4 months. These costs include the units, piping, and 

pumps. They represent a relatively simple engineering job without extremely long pipe runs. 

They do not include freight and installation labor since these costs are very site-specific 

especially freight. They also do not include any site preparation costs. As an example he said 

freight could cost $3,000 to $4,000 per unit each way but is highly variable due to distance and 

recent changes in freight costs. Thus, the costs do not cover mobilization and demobilization 

activities. However, the units may remain onsite for the remainder of the year at no extra cost. So 

if a multi-year contract is used the mobilization and demobilization costs can be amortized over 
the length of the contract. The rental costs also include all maintenance costs. The vendor will 

replace and repair all equipment such as pumps, etc. The systems are monitored and controlled 

using computers so no additional operational labor is needed.

The costs do not include power supply equipment. He said that since the client being a power 

company they will likely be able to provide this component themselves so he only provided the 

me power requirements. He noted that the power requirements provided were on the high side 

especially for larger systems.

Regarding space requirements, he said that in some cases if space is a problem they have 

installed cooling units and/or pumps on barges.

He also noted that rentals are an easier option for power plants because they can be paid for using 

the operating budget as opposed to funding as a capital expenditure which requires all sorts 

planning, approvals, etc.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

In the Matter of C. A., a Juvenile,

 Appellant.

'

'

'

'

'

'

No. 08-16-00143-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 1

of Denton County, Texas 

(TC# JV-2014-00158)

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is Appellant’s motion to consolidate cause numbers 

08-16-00140-CV, 08-16-00141-CV, 08-16-00142-CV, 08-16-00143-CV, and 08-16-00144-CV

into a single appeal. To the extent Appellant is requesting that all five appeals proceed under a 

single cause number, the motion is DENIED. The Court will, however, permit Appellant and 

the State to file consolidated briefs (a single brief bearing all five cause numbers).

IT IS SO ORDERED this 25th day of August, 2016.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Hughes, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

             CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE, ACCOUNTING AND
             FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the Quarterly Report of New Pacific Ventures, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I
Brent Petterson, Secretary/Treasurer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

    (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.

/s/Brent Petterson
-------------------
Brent Petterson
Secretary/Treasurer/Director

September 10, 2004
#### § 280.2 Definitions used in this subpart.

In addition to the definitions provided in 15 U.S.C. 5402, the following definitions are applicable to this part:

*Abandonment of the Application.* The application for registration of a trademark on the Principal Register is no longer pending at the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

*Act.* The Fastener Quality Act (15 U.S.C. 5401 *et seq.,* as amended by Pub. L. 104-113, Pub. L. 105-234, and Public Law 106-34).

*Administrative law judge (ALJ).* The person authorized to conduct hearings in administrative enforcement proceedings brought under the Act.

*Assistant Secretary.* The Assistant Secretary for Export Enforcement, Bureau of Export Administration.

*Department.* The United States Department of Commerce, specifically, the Bureau of Export Administration, NIST and the Patent and Trademark Office.

*Director, NIST.* The Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

*Director, USPTO.* The Under Secretary for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

*Fastener Insignia Register.* The register of recorded fastener insignias maintained by the Director.

*Final decision.* A decision or order assessing a civil penalty or otherwise disposing of or dismissing a case, which is not subject to further review under this part, but which is subject to collection proceedings or judicial review in an appropriate Federal district court as authorized by law.

*Initial decision.* A decision of the administrative law judge which is subject to review by the Under Secretary for Export Administration, but which becomes the final decision of the Department in the absence of such an appeal.

*Party.* The Department and any person named as a respondent under this part.

*Principal Register.* The register of trademarks established under 15 U.S.C. 1051.

*Respondent.* Any person named as the subject of a charging letter, proposed charging letter, or other order proposed or issued under this part.

*Revisions* includes changes made to existing ISO/IEC Guides or other documents, and redesignations of those Guides or documents.

*Under Secretary.* The Under Secretary for Export Administration, United States Department of Commerce.

[61 FR 50558, Sept. 26, 1996. Redesignated and amended at 65 FR 39801, June 28, 2000]
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I,
Michael A. Reisner, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President of ICON Capital
Corp., the Manager of the Registrant, in connection with the Quarterly Report of
ICON Income Fund Ten, LLC (the “LLC”) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”) certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the LLC.











Date: November
13, 2008





/s/Michael A.
Reisner___


Michael
A. Reisner


Co-Chief
Executive Officer and Co-President


ICON
Capital Corp.


Manager
of ICON Income Fund Ten,
LLC
### §20101. Organization

(a) Federal Charter.—Agricultural Hall of Fame (in this chapter, the "corporation") is a federally chartered corporation.

(b) Perpetual Existence.—Except as otherwise provided, the corporation has perpetual existence.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1284.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20101(a) | 36:971. | Aug. 31, 1960, Pub. L. 86–680, §§1, 2, 4(1), 16, 74 Stat. 572, 574, 577. |
| | 36:972. | |
| 20101(b) | 36:974(1). | |
| | 36:986. | |

Section

This section is substituted for the source provisions for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate executed and unnecessary words.
1

The HONORABLE ROBERT W. PRATT, United States District Judge for the

Southern District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 01-3939

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Southern District of Iowa.

*

Francisco Raygoza-Aguayo, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: April 24, 2002

 Filed: April 26, 2002

___________

Before LOKEN, BEAM, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Francisco Raygoza-Aguayo pleaded guilty to illegal reentry following

deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b), and was sentenced to 46

months in prison and 2 years supervised release. On appeal, he challenges the district

court’s1

 failure to grant a downward departure based on his status as an alien subject

to removal.
-2-

As Raygoza acknowledges, his argument is foreclosed by United States v.

Cardosa-Rodriguez, 241 F.3d 613, 614 (8th Cir. 2001) (deportable aliens’ ineligibility

for Bureau of Prisons benefits does not provide basis for downward departure in

illegal-reentry cases).

Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Order entered October 2, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 00835 - CV EX PARTE CHARLES FER RIS On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court

Collin County, T exas Trial Court Cause No. 401 - 01805 - 2019



### O RDER Before the Court is appellee’s September 30, 2019 motion to substitute counsel

. We GRANT the motion and DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to remove Andrew Morris of The Coffey Firm as appellee’s counsel and su bstitute J. Edward Niehaus of Bodkin Niehaus Dorris & Jolley PLLC in his place.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
### §70913. Liability for acts of officers and agents

The FFA is liable for the acts of its officers and agents acting within the scope of their authority.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1359; Pub. L. 116–7, §14, Feb. 21, 2019, 133 Stat. 482.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 70913 | 36:281. | Aug. 30, 1950, ch. 823, §11, 64 Stat. 566. |

Section

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2019—Pub. L. 116–7 substituted "FFA" for "corporation".
### §2103. Furnishing of plans and specifications

(a) Plans and Specifications.—The Secretary is authorized to furnish to individuals eligible for assistance under this chapter, without cost to the individuals, model plans and specifications of suitable housing units.

(b) Handbook for Design.—The Secretary shall make available to veterans eligible for assistance under this chapter, without cost to the veterans, a handbook containing appropriate designs for specially adapted housing. The Secretary shall update such handbook at least once every six years to take into account any new or unique disabilities, including vision impairments, impairments specific to the upper limbs, and burn injuries.

(Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1168, §803; renumbered §2103 and amended Pub. L. 102–83, §§4(b)(1), (2)(E), 5(a), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 404–406; Pub. L. 110–289, div. B, title VI, §2602(b)(4), July 30, 2008, 122 Stat. 2859; Pub. L. 110–389, title V, §503, Oct. 10, 2008, 122 Stat. 4176.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Prior section 2103, Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1223, related to payment of mustering-out payments to beneficiaries of deceased members, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 89–50, §1(a), June 24, 1965, 79 Stat. 173, effective July 1, 1966.

#### Amendments

2008—Pub. L. 110–389 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, and added subsec. (b).

Pub. L. 110–289 substituted "individuals" for "veterans" in two places.

1991—Pub. L. 102–83 renumbered section 803 of this title as this section and substituted "Secretary" for "Administrator".
#### Parkview Paving Company, Inc. *v.*City of New Haven et al.

*Steven B. Kaplan,*in support of the petition.

*H. Gordon Hall,*in opposition.

Decided April 15, 1988

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 13 Conn. App."574, is denied.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 217 (Wednesday, November 10, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65222-65223]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24983]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Juan Bautista de Anza National Historic Trail Advisory 
Commission; Notice of Meeting

SUMMARY: Notice is given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act that the third meeting of the Juan Bautista de Anza 
National Historic Trail Advisory Commission will be held as follows:

DATES/TIMES: Saturday, November 13, from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. and 
Sunday, November 14, 2004, from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Santa Clara University, 500 El 
Camino Real, Santa Clara, California. The meeting on November 13 will 
be in the Seminar Room of Casa Italiana and on November 14 in the 
Weigand Room, Arts and Sciences Building. For a map of the campus go to 
http://www.scu.edu/map/. Saturday afternoon there will be a tour of 
Mission Santa Clara Asis. The public is welcome.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION AND COPIES OF MEETING MINUTES CONTACT: Meredith 
Kaplan, Juan Bautista de Anza National Historic Trail, 1111 Jackson 
Street, Suite 700, Oakland, California 94607, at (510) 817-1438, or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#076a627562636e736f586c66776b66694769777429606871"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="462b233423222f322e192d27362a27280628363568212930">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    The Advisory Commission was established in accordance with the 
National Trails System Act (915 U.S.C. 1241 et seq), as amended by 
Public Law 191-365 to consult with the Secretary of Interior on 
planning and other matters relating to the trail.

Agenda

1. Welcome
2. Review trail status
3. Web de Anza update

[[Page 65223]]

4. Subcommittee report on forming a foundation or friends group
5. Approve or reject forming non-profit friends group or foundation
6. Discuss promotion and implementation strategies

    This meeting is open to the public and opportunity will be provided 
for public comments at specific times during the meeting and prior to 
closing the meeting. The meeting will be recorded for documentation and 
transcribed for dissemination. Minutes of the meeting will be available 
to the public after approval of the full Advisory Commission.

    Dated: October 4, 2004.
Jonathan B. Jarvis,
Regional Director, Pacific West Region.
[FR Doc. 04-24983 Filed 11-9-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-52-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Oregon Pacific & Eastern Railway

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning the continued

status of Oregon Pacific & Eastern Railway (ORE), B.A. 3730, as an employer under

the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231 et. sea.) (RRA) and the Railroad

Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. § 351 et. seq.) (RUIA).

Information regarding ORE was provided by Ms. Catherine A. Shaw, attorney for OPE.

In Interstate Commerce Commission Finance Docket Numbers AB-401 (Sub-No. 1)

and AB-401 X , OPE abandoned a 3.35 mile segment of rail line between milepost 0.0

at Cottage Grove and milepost 3.35 at Mosby Creek, in Lane County, Oregon and a

14.5 mile segment of rail line between milepost 3.35 at Mosby Creek and milepost

17.5 at Culp Creek, Oregon. According to Ms. Shaw, OPE ceased rail operations on

April 29, 1994 and its employees last performed compensated service on August 15,

1 994. On August 24, 1 994, OPE donated approximately 14 miles of right-of-way to

the United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management, and on

November 30, 1994, OPE sold an additional 3.35 miles of right-of-way, car repair

shop, and other real estate to the City of Cottage Grove, Oregon. Ms. Shaw also

advised that CPE's machinery and equipment were sold at an auction conducted on

August 15, 1994. OPE was dissolved as a corporation on December 19, 1994.

Section 202.1 1 (20 CFR § 202.11) of the Board's regulations states:

The employer status of any company or person shall terminate whenever such

company or person loses any of the characteristics essential to the existence

of an employer status.

The evidence establishes that OPE ceased operations on April 29, 1994 and last

compensated its employees on August 1 5, 1 994. OPE was dissolved as a corporation

on December 1 9, 1 994. OPE no longer possesses the characteristics of an operating

railroad covered under the Acts; accordingly, under section 202.11 of the Board's

regulations, OPE is no longer a covered employer under the RRA and the RUIA.

In accordance with the above, the Board finds that effective with the close of

business August 15,1 994, the last day on which it paid compensation reportable to

this agency, OPE ceased to be an employer underTbe_£BA and the RUIA.

Glen L. Bower '

V. M. Speakman, Jr.J

Jerome F. Kever

BCD 1995-79 BA # 3730
#### § 296.30 Monitoring and evaluation.

The Program will provide monitoring and evaluation of areas of critical national need and its investments through periodic analyses. It will develop methods and metrics for assessing impact at all stages. These analyses will contribute to the establishment and adoption of best practices.
### §14523. Program implementation

(a) Requirements.—A program or project authorized under this chapter shall not be implemented until—

(1) the responsible federal official has decided that applications and plans relating to the program or project are not incompatible with the provisions and objectives of federal laws that the official administers that are not inconsistent with this subtitle; and

(2) the Appalachian Regional Commission has approved the program or project and has determined that it—

(A) meets the applicable criteria under section 14524 of this title and the requirements of the development planning process under section 14525 of this title; and

(B) will contribute to the development of the Appalachian region.

(b) Decision Is Controlling.—A decision under subsection (a)(2) is controlling and shall be accepted by the federal agencies.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1274.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 14523 | 40 App.:223. | Pub. L. 89–4, title II, §223, Mar. 9, 1965, 79 Stat. 18; Pub. L. 90–103, title I, §118, Oct. 11, 1967, 81 Stat. 264; Pub. L. 94–188, title I, §116, Dec. 31, 1975, 89 Stat. 1083. |

Section
### §17302. Compliance

(a) Prescribing Regulations.—With the approval of the President, the Secretary of the Treasury and the United States Postal Service jointly shall prescribe regulations governing the shipment of valuables by an executive department, independent establishment, agency, wholly owned Government corporation, officer, or employee of the Federal Government, with a view to minimizing the risk of loss and destruction of, and damage to, valuables in shipment.

(b) Compliance.—Each executive department, independent establishment, agency, wholly owned Government corporation, officer, and employee of the Government, and each person acting for, or at the direction of, the executive department, independent establishment, agency, wholly owned Government corporation, officer, or employee, must comply with the regulations when making any shipment of valuables.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1280.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 17302 | 40:721. | July 8, 1937, ch. 444, §1, 50 Stat. 479. |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "As soon as practicable after July 8, 1937" are omitted as obsolete. The words "United States Postal Service" are substituted for "Postmaster General" in section 1 of the Government Losses in Shipment Act (ch. 444, 50 Stat. 479) because of section 4(a) of the Postal Reorganization Act (Public Law 91–375, 84 Stat. 773).

In subsection (b), the words "After the effective date of such regulations, which shall be not more than thirty days after their issuance" are omitted as obsolete.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

For power of Secretary of the Treasury and United States Postal Service to prescribe, without approval of President, regulations under section 721 of former Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works (which was repealed and reenacted as this section by Pub. L. 107–217, §§1, 6(b), Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062, 1304), see section 3(a) of Ex. Ord. No. 10289, Sept. 17, 1951, 16 F.R. 9499, set out as a note under section 301 of Title 3, The President.