alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Nichols, Shepard & Co., plaintiffs in error, v. John D. Hail, defendant in error.

1. Practice: final judgment. A'judgment upon the verdict of a jury finding for defendant, for costs only, is not a final judgment.

2. -: - — . To obtain the review of a case in this court, there must be a final judgment upon the merits of the case, in the court below.

Error from the district court for Cuming county. Tried below before Griffey, J.

*Uriah*Bruner, for plaintiffs in error.

*Stevenson, Oarrigan <£> Osborn,*for defendant in error.

Gantt, J.

The record in this case shows a trial by jury, a verdict of the jury finding for the defendant, a motion by plaintiffs for a new trial, and it concludes as follows:

> “ The court being fully ad'vised in the premises, it is ordered and adjudged that said motion be and the same *195is hereby overruled, to which ruling of the court the plaintiffs then and there excepted. It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the court that the defendant have and recover of plaintiffs judgment upon the verdict of the jury for his costs taxed at $67.93.”

This is not a judgment upon the finding of the jury, disposing of the merits of the case. A final judgment in such case is:

> *“*It is considered by the court that the plaintiff take nothing by his writ, and that the defendant go hence without day.” The record entry is simply an assertion that the *“*defendant have and recover of plaintiffs a judgment for his costs.”

As the record contains no final judgment upon which error will lie, the cause must be remanded to the district court, in order that it may be proceeded therein to final judgment, according to law.

Judgment accordingly.
§ 736.1 Introduction. In this part, references to the EAR are references to 15 CFR chapter VII, subchapter C. A person may undertake transactions subject to the EAR without a license or other authorization, unless the regulations affirmatively state such a requirement. As such, if an export, reexport, or activity is subject to the EAR, the general prohibitions contained in this part and the License Exceptions specified in part 740 of the EAR must be reviewed to determine if a license is necessary. In the case of all exports from the United States, you must document your export as described in part 762 of the EAR regarding recordkeeping and clear your export through the U.S. Customs Service as described in part 758 of the EAR regarding export clearance requirements. Also note that for short supply controls all prohibitions and License Exceptions are in part 754 of the EAR. ( a ) In this part we tell you: ( 1 ) The facts that make your proposed export, reexport, or conduct subject to these general prohibitions, and
( 2 ) The ten general prohibitions.
( b ) Your obligations under the ten general prohibitions and under the EAR depend in large part upon the five types of information described in § 736.2(a) of this part and upon the general prohibitions described in § 736.2(b) of this part. The ten general prohibitions contain cross-references to other parts of the EAR that further define the breadth of the general prohibitions. For that reason, this part is not freestanding. In part 732, we provide certain steps you may follow in proper order to help you understand the general prohibitions and their relationship to other parts of the EAR.
( c ) If you violate any of these ten general prohibitions, or engage in other conduct contrary to the Export Administration Act, the EAR, or any order, license, License Exception, or authorization issued thereunder, as described in part 764 of the EAR regarding enforcement, you will be subject to the sanctions described in that part.
#### In the Matter of Peter S. Spitz, an Attorney.

Present ■—-Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 776-777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-1]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Connecticut Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a planning meeting of 
the

[[Page 777]]

Connecticut Advisory Committee to the Commission will be held at the 
University of Connecticut School of Law, Faculty Lounge, 55 Elizabeth 
Street, Hartford, CT 06105, and will convene at 12:00 noon (EST) 
Friday, January 13, 2012. The purpose of the planning meeting is to 
work to finalize the Committee report on racial profiling.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the regional office by Monday, February 
13, 2011. Comments may be mailed to the Eastern Regional Office, U.S. 
Commission on Civil Rights, 624 9th Street NW., Suite 740, Washington, 
DC 20425, faxed to (202) 376-7548, or emailed to ero@usccr.gov.
    Persons needing accessibility services should contact the Eastern 
Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled 
date of the meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Eastern Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Eastern Regional Office at the above 
email or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, December 31, 2011.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit
[FR Doc. 2012-1 Filed 1-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
Page 1 of 1 

 

POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT 

Assessor: 

 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES 

Scenario#: Number of Release Sites: 

Release Activity: 

Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE 

Total Releases: 

 

(kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) 

Release Days/yr: 

 

Per Site Release: 

(kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day) 

Remarks: EAB DROP: Release information for this compound does not meet criteria for preparation 

of an exposure assessment in the Exposure Assessment Branch=s (EAB) Initial Review 

Exposure Report (this report). 

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 1
### §622. Collocation among United States Postal Service properties

(a) Identification of Postal Property.—Each year, the Postmaster General shall—

(1) identify a list of postal properties with space available for use by Federal agencies; and

(2) not later than September 30, submit the list to—

(A) the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate; and

(B) the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the House of Representatives.

(b) Voluntary Identification of Postal Property.—Each year, the Postmaster General may submit the list under subsection (a) to the Council.

(c) Submission of List of Postal Properties to Federal Agencies.—

(1) In general.—Not later than 30 days after the completion of a list under subsection (a), the Council shall provide the list to each Federal agency.

(2) Review by federal agencies.—Not later than 90 days after the receipt of the list submitted under paragraph (1), each Federal agency shall—

(A) review the list;

(B) review properties under the control of the Federal agency; and

(C) recommend collocations if appropriate.

(d) Terms of Collocation.—On approval of the recommendations under subsection (c) by the Postmaster General and the applicable agency head, the Federal agency or appropriate landholding entity may work with the Postmaster General to establish appropriate terms of a lease for each postal property.

(e) Rule of Construction.—Nothing in this section exceeds, modifies, or supplants any other Federal law relating to any competitive bidding process governing the leasing of postal property.

(Added Pub. L. 114–318, §3(a), Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1609.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Oversight and Reform of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 6, One Hundred Sixteenth Congress, Jan. 9, 2019. Committee on Oversight and Reform of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Oversight and Accountability of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Eighteenth Congress, Jan. 9, 2023.
Editorial Note on Part 922
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

§ 922.150 Boundary. ( a ) The Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary (Sanctuary) consists of an area of approximately 2,408 square nautical miles (nmi2) (3,188 sq. mi.) of coastal and ocean waters, and the submerged lands thereunder, off the central and northern coast of the State of Washington.
( b ) The Sanctuary boundary extends from Koitlah Point due north to the United States/Canada international boundary. The Sanctuary boundary then follows the U.S./Canada international boundary seaward to the 100 fathom isobath. The seaward boundary of the Sanctuary approximates the 100 fathom isobath in a southerly direction from the U.S./Canada international boundary to a point due west of the mouth of the Copalis River cutting across the heads of Nitnat, Juan de Fuca and Quinault Canyons. The coastal boundary of the Sanctuary is the mean higher high water line when adjacent to Federally managed lands cutting across the mouths of all rivers and streams, except where adjacent to Indian reservations, State and county owned lands; in such case, the coastal boundary is the mean lower low water line. La Push harbor is excluded from the Sanctuary boundary shoreward of the International Collision at Sea regulation (Colreg.) demarcation lines. The boundary coordinates are listed in appendix A to this subpart.
[60 FR 66877, Dec. 27, 1995, as amended at 76 FR 67360, Nov. 1, 2011; 88 FR 969, Jan.6, 2023]
### §408. International money-order exchanges

The Postal Service may make arrangements with other governments, with which postal conventions are or may be concluded, for the exchange of sums of money by means of postal orders. It shall fix limitations on the amount which may be so exchanged and the rates of exchange.

(Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 725.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1971, pursuant to Resolution No. 71–9 of the Board of Governors. See section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note preceding section 101 of this title.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors and StockholdersRightNow Technologies, Inc.:

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form S-8 (Nos.333-149776, 333-141340, 333-138543, 333-124329, 333-118515) of RightNowTechnologies Inc. of our reports dated March 6, 2009, with respect to theconsolidated balance sheets of RightNow Technologies, Inc. as of December 31,2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations,stockholders’ equity and comprehensive loss, and cash flows, for each of theyears in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, and the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, whichreports appear in the December 31, 2008 annual report on Form 10 K of RightNowTechnologies, Inc.

 

Our report on theconsolidated financial statements refers to RightNow Technologies, Inc.’sadoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48, *Accounting for Uncertainties in Income Taxes, an Interpretation of FASBStatement No. 109,* effective January 1, 2007.

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

 

Portland, OregonMarch 6, 2009

 

----
§ 700.2 Introduction. ( a ) Certain national defense and energy programs (including military, emergency preparedness, homeland security, and critical infrastructure protection and restoration activities) may be eligible for priorities and allocations support as determined by a Determination Department.
( b ) The Department of Commerce administers the DPAS and may exercise priorities and allocations authority to ensure the timely delivery of industrial resources to meet approved program requirements.
( c ) The Department of Commerce has delegated authority to place priority ratings on contracts or orders necessary or appropriate to promote the national defense to certain government agencies that issue such contracts or orders. Such delegations include authority to authorize recipients of rated orders to place ratings on contracts or orders to contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers. Schedule I to this part includes a list of agencies to which the Department of Commerce has delegated authority. The Department of Commerce is also listed as an agency for programs where its authorization is necessary to place rated orders.
[89 FR 58970, July 22, 2024]
BA # 4664
NRC ISSUES LICENSE TO GE-HITACHI

FOR LASER URANIUM ENRICHMENT PLANT IN NORTH CAROLINA

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission today issued a license to General Electric-Hitachi 

Global Laser Enrichment LLC (GLE) to construct and operate a uranium enrichment plant using 

laser technology in Wilmington, N.C.

The license authorizes GLE to enrich uranium up to 8 percent by weight in the fissile 

isotope U-235, using a laser-based technology. This low-enriched uranium will be used in fuel for 

commercial nuclear power reactors. GLE plans to construct the plant at the site of GE-Hitachi’s 

existing Global Nuclear Fuel-America’s fuel fabrication plant.

GLE submitted its license application on June 26, 2009. The NRC staff conducted thorough 

safety and environmental reviews of the proposed facility. A Safety Evaluation Report (NUREG2120) and Final Environmental Impact Statement (NUREG-1938) were published in February. The 

Safety Evaluation Report documented the staff’s conclusions that GLE’s proposed facility complies 

with NRC regulations and would not pose an undue risk to the health and safety of workers or the 

public. The Environmental Impact Statement concluded there would be no significant 

environmental impacts that would preclude licensing the facility.

The NRC’s review of the GLE license application provided several opportunities for public 

comment and participation, including public meetings in Wilmington in July 2008 to discuss the 

review process; May 2009 to discuss the scope of the NRC’s environmental review; July 2010 to 

present the draft EIS and receive public comment; and May 2012 to present the final safety and 

environmental reports. 

A notice of opportunity to request an adjudicatory hearing was published Jan. 13, 2010; no 

hearing requests were received. Under NRC regulations, an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 

conducted a mandatory hearing on the staff’s review in July. The Board issued its decision 

authorizing the staff to issue the license Sept. 19.

The NRC staff will conduct inspections during the construction and operation of the GLE

facility. The agency plans to hold a public meeting in Wilmington before construction begins to 

explain its oversight plans to the public.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES link 

on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to 

NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 12-106 September 25, 2012
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 222 (Thursday, November 18, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 67535]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25607]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Availability of Seats for the Florida Keys National Marine 
Sanctuary Advisory Council

AGENCY: National Marine Sanctuary Program (NMSP), National Ocean 
Service (NOS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 
Department of Commerce (DOC).

ACTION: Notice and request for applications.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary (FKNMS or 
Sanctuary) is seeking applicants for the following vacant seats on its 
Sanctuary Advisory Council (Council): Maritime Heritage; South Florida 
Ecosystem Restoration; South Florida Ecosystem Restoration (alternate); 
Citizen-at-Large, Upper Keys (alternate); Commercial fishing, Marine/
Tropical (alternate); Charter Fishing, Sports (alternate) and 
Conservation & Environment (2). Applicants are chosen based upon their 
particular expertise and experience in relation to the seat for which 
they are applying; community and professional affiliations; philosophy 
regarding the protection and management of marine resources; and the 
length of residence in the area affected by the Sanctuary. The 
Conservation & Environment seat has the additional requirement that the 
applicants are employed by accredited non-profit organizations and live 
in Monroe County or Dade County. Applicants who are chosen as members 
should expect to serve 3-year terms, pursuant to the Council's Charter.

DATES: Applications are due by December 3, 2004.

ADDRESSES: Application kits may be obtained from Fiona Wilmot, Florida 
Keys National Marine Sanctuary, P.O. Box 500368, Marathon, FL 33050. 
Completed applications should be sent to the same address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fiona Wilmot at the above address or 
(305) 743-2437, ext. 27 or [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Council provides information for 
Sanctuary Managers on a wide variety of issues. The 20 member Council 
of stakeholders reflects the larger community from which it is drawn 
and meets bimonthly. Smaller working groups meet as necessary on 
specific topics.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1431, et seq.

(Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog Number 11.429, Marine Sanctuary 
Program)

    Dated: November 10, 2004.
Daniel J. Basta,
Director, National Marine Sanctuary Program, National Ocean Services, 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
[FR Doc. 04-25607 Filed 11-17-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-NK-M
```
#### § 2011.201 General.

This subpart sets forth the terms and conditions under which certificates will be issued to U.S. importers for importing specialty sugars from specialty sugar source countries. Specialty sugars imported from specialty sugar source countries may not be entered unless accompanied by a specialty sugar certificate. This subpart applies only to the ability to enter specialty sugar at the in-quota tariff rates of the quota (subheadings 1701.11.10, 1701.12.10, 1701.91.10, 1701.99.10, 1702.90.10, and 2106.90.44 of the HTS). Nothing in this subpart shall affect the ability to enter articles at the over-quota tariff rate (subheadings 1701.11.50, 1701.12.50, 1701.91.30, 1701.99.50, 1702.90.20, 2106.90.46).

[61 FR 26785, May 29, 1996]
AUTOMOTIVE MARKET GROWS IN GEORGIA

----

**May 1998**
by David Chantladze
Georgia has a small but growing market for imported automobiles.  American vehicles are popularin this market, but parts and accessories are scarce.  Over the last five years, several foreign carmakers have opened dealerships in Georgia and are importing new vehicles.  U.S. exporters ofparts and accessories have a good opportunity to establish themselves in a market that is likely togrow as Georgia's economy benefits from Caspian Sea energy development.
**The Market**
#### Elizabeth Reich, Appellant, v. Eva M. B. Lane, Respondent. Elizabeth Reich, Appellant, v. Eva M. B. Lane, as Administratrix, etc., and Another, Respondents.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 8b

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 8b appear at 68 FR 51353, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 8b.1 Purpose.

Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, prohibits discrimination on the basis of handicap in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. The purpose of this part is to implement section 504 with respect to programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department of Commerce.
No. IV-12-007

Contact: Victor Dricks (817) 200-1128

 Lara Uselding (817) 200-1159

 

 February 23, 2012 

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS RESULTS OF AUGMENTED INSPECTION

CONDUCTED AT THE WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a public meeting on March 6 to discuss 

the results of an Augmented Inspection conducted at the Wolf Creek nuclear power plant 

following a loss of off-site power that occurred there. The plant is located near Burlington, Kan.

The meeting will begin at 7 p.m. at the New Strawn Community Center, 319 W. Getz, in 

New Strawn, Kan. The meeting is open to public observation and members of the NRC staff will 

be available to answer questions from members of the public after the business portion of the 

meeting.

On Jan. 13, officials at the Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Co., declared an Unusual 

Event after the failure of a main generator electrical breaker, followed by an unexplained loss of 

power to a startup transformer. This caused the switchyard to be de-energized, which removed 

the plant’s connection to the electrical power grid. All safety systems responded as expected 

and emergency diesel generators automatically powered safety-related equipment. An Unusual 

Event is the lowest of four NRC emergency categories.

The Unusual Event was terminated about three hours later after offsite power was 

partially restored. 

The NRC will issue a report on the results of the inspection within 30 days.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV

 1600 E. Lamar Blvd.

 Arlington, TX 76011 - 4125

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov
#### § 831.1001 Purpose.

This subpart sets forth the provisions concerning employees and Members who are simultaneously covered by the Old Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI) tax and the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS). Except as provided under this subpart, these employees and Members are treated the same as other covered employees and Members under the CSRS.