alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 922
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

§ 922.31 National Marine Sanctuary special use permits. ( a ) *In general.* A person may conduct a specified special use permit activity, if such activity is specifically authorized by, and is conducted in accordance with the scope, purpose, manner, terms and conditions of, a special use permit issued under this section.
( b ) *Authority to issue.* The Director, at his or her discretion, may issue a special use permit in accordance with this subpart and section 310 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1441).
( c ) *Public notice.* The Director will not issue a special use permit for any category of activity unless the Director has published a notice in the Federal Register that such category of activity is subject to the requirements of section 310 of the Act.
( d ) *Fees.* The Director may assess and collect fees for the conduct of any activity authorized by a special use permit issued pursuant to this section. The fee will be assessed in accordance with § 922.35.
[88 FR 958, Jan. 6, 2023, as amended at 89 FR 48287, June 6, 2024]
#### Banque de Salonique, Respondent, v. Jules Fabry et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.; Callahan, J., dissents and votes to reverse and grant defendants’ motion to declare service a nullity on the ground that there was no necessity for such second service.
#### BALDWIN v. SOUTH DAKOTA CENT. RY. CO.

(Opinion filed, May 24, 1910.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lake Count}'-. Plon. Joseph W. Jonjís, Judge.

Action by A. A. Baldwin against the South Dakota Central Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, and an order denying a new -trial, defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

*Joe*Kirby, for appellant.

*Krause*& Krause, for respondent.

McGOY, J.

It appears that in 1905, plaintiff was lawfully in possession of certain fenced pasture lands, under lease from the fee owner thereof, situated in Lake county; that on the loth day of June, 1905, defendant wrongfully and unlawfully and without the consent of plaintiff, or the owner of said lands, entered upon said lands and took down and removed a portion of said pasture fence, and constructed a line of railway grade across the same, all without previous notice to plaintiff, and while plaintiff was absent from his home on adjacent lands; that by reason of the faking down and removal of said fence the cattle in said pasture in charge of plaintiff were permitted to escape and wander away, and that plaintiff was thereby necessarily compelled to expend time and labor in searching for and recovering said cattle, one of which never was found; that in so constructing said railway grade across said lands plaintiff was wholly deprived of the use *471of 36 acres thereof the remainder of said season. This suit was brought to recover damages caused to plaintiff in consequence of the said acts of defendant. On trial, by stipulation before the court without jury, findings and judgment were rendered in favor of plaintiff for the sum of.$135, with interest and costs, defendant appeals, alleging the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the findings and judgment. There is no conflict in the evidence. We are of the opinion that each and all the findings of the learned trial court are sustained by .the evidence, and that there is sufficient evidence to sustain the amount of damage found. It will serve no useful purpose to reproduce the evidence.

Finding no error -in the record, the judgment of the circuit court and the order denying a new trial, appealed from, are affirmed.
# L_2020368EN.01001201.xml

| 5.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 368/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 368/12

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 110/2018

of 31 May 2018

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2020/1614]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/773 of 15 May 2018 on design, construction and performance requirements and testing standards for marine equipment and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/306 of 6 February 2017 (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/773 of 15 May 2018 on design, construction and performance requirements and testing standards for marine equipment and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/306 of 6 February 2017 (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/773 repeals Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/306, which is incorporated into the EEA Agreement and which is consequently to be repealed under the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/773 repeals Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/306, which is incorporated into the EEA Agreement and which is consequently to be repealed under the EEA Agreement.

| (3) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The text of point 3 (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/306) of Chapter XXXII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement shall be replaced by the following:

‘
  32018 R 0773: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/773 of 15 May 2018 on design, construction and performance requirements and testing standards for marine equipment and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/306 of 6 February 2017 (OJ L 133, 30.5.2018, p. 1).’.

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/773 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 June 2018, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 31 May 2018.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 133, 30.5.2018, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
#### §§ 8c.4-8c.9 [Reserved]
#### In the Matter of the Application of I. Charles Schwalb for Reinstatement as an Attorney.

Motion for reinstatement denied. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Breitel, JJ.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# May 2011 Report on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206.

Accession Number: ML111590047

Date Released: Wednesday, June 22, 2011

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML111430653 - 06/15/2011 Memorandum Regarding May 2011 Report on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 CFR of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206. (3 page(s), 6/15/2011)
    - ML111430675 - Monthly Status Report 10CFR2.206, "Request for Action under this Subpart Status Report". (23 page(s), 6/15/2011)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
06/08/201 1 11:4 0 VA X703358101 1 AI A f^00 2 

# NAC A ':)R!AT:Cl- , •i-' W

_o , ^ q q Nationa lAi r Carrie r AsBCkciatio n 100 0Wilso nBlvd , Suite170

0 Arlington , V

A22209 Ph : (703)358-806 1 Fax : (703 ) 358-8070 www.naca-cc

Jun e8 , 201 1

Honorabl eRa yLaHoo d Secretar y U.S . Departmen t o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , S E Washington , D C 2 059 0 Re : Fina l Rul e Enhancin g Airlin e Passenge r Protection s Docke t N . DOT-OST-2010-014 0 Dea r Mr . LaHood : Nationa l Ai r Carrie r Association , o nbehal f o f itsel f cin dit s members , join s th e reques t date dJun e 7 , 2011 , o f Ai r Transpor t Association ^ Regiona l Airlin e Association , an dAi r Carrie r Associatio no f Americ a t o exten dth e deadlin e fo r complianc e wit hregulation s promulgate dApri l 25 , 2011 , Enhancin g Airlin e Passenge r Protections , 7 5 Fed . Reg . 23110-167 . Th e deadlin e shoul d b e extende d becaus e o f th e complexit yan d cos t o f achievin g compliance , a s explaine di nATA' s request . NAC Aha s oppose d th e regulation s i nthei r curren t forman d continue s t o d o so . Assumin g th e regulation s d o g o int o effec t i nthei r curren t form , however , NAC Abelieve s complianc e canno t b e achieve d withi nth e tim e contemplate dbyth e regulation s withou t undu e cos t t o th e airline s an dconfusio nt o th e travelin g publi c Th e deadlin e shoul dtherefor e b e extende da s requeste d i nATA' s request . Your s truly . 

# ^(Qs^iiist^Sioo^ ^ A . Oakle yBroot s Presiden t
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2538 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2538

 To designate the United States courthouse located at 400 North Miami 
   Avenue in Miami, Florida, as the ``Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. United 
                          States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 19, 2003

  Mr. Meek of Florida (for himself, Mr. Hastings of Florida, Ms. Ros-
Lehtinen, Mr. Lincoln Diaz-Balart of Florida, Mr. Mario Diaz-Balart of 
Florida, Mr. Deutsch, and Ms. Corrine Brown of Florida) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the United States courthouse located at 400 North Miami 
   Avenue in Miami, Florida, as the ``Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. United 
                          States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 400 North Miami Avenue in 
Miami, Florida, shall be known and designated as the ``Wilkie D. 
Ferguson, Jr. United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Wilkie D. 
Ferguson, Jr. United States Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
### §20505. Annual meeting

The corporation shall hold an annual meeting at a place in the United States as may from time to time be designated.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1288.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20505 | 36:3203 (last sentence). | Aug. 25, 1937, ch. 762, §3 (last sentence), 50 Stat. 799. |

Section
§ 923.23 Other areas of particular concern. ( a ) The management program may, but is not required to, designate specific areas known to require additional or special management, but for which additional management techniques have not been developed or necessary authorities have not been established at the time of program approval. If a management program includes such designations, the basis for designation must be clearly stated, and a reasonable time frame and procedures must be set forth for developing and implementing appropriate management techniques. These procedures must provide for the development of those items required in § 923.21. The management program must identify an agency (or agencies) capable of formulating the necessary management policies and techniques.
( b ) The management program must meet the requirements of § 923.22 for containing procedures for designating areas for preservation or restoration. The management program may include procedures and criteria for designating areas of particular concern for other than preservation or restoration purposes after program approval.
§ 8a.135 Designation of responsible employee and adoption of grievance procedures. ( a ) *Designation of responsible employee.* Each recipient shall designate at least one employee to coordinate its efforts to comply with and carry out its responsibilities under these Title IX regulations, including any investigation of any complaint communicated to such recipient alleging its noncompliance with these Title IX regulations or alleging any actions that would be prohibited by these Title IX regulations. The recipient shall notify all its students and employees of the name, office address, and telephone number of the employee or employees appointed pursuant to this paragraph.
( b ) *Complaint procedure of recipient.* A recipient shall adopt and publish grievance procedures providing for prompt and equitable resolution of student and employee complaints alleging any action that would be prohibited by these Title IX regulations.
Coös,

June, 1898,

#### Lydon, *Adm’x, v.*Grand Trunk Railway Co.

Case, for negligence, by the administratrix of the estate of an employee of the defendants. Trial by jury and verdict for the plaintiff. At the close of the evidence, subject to the defendant’s exception, the court denied their motion to direct a verdict in their favor.

*Albert 8. Twitchell,*for the plaintiff.

*Robert N. Chamberlin*and *Clarence A. Hight*(of Maine), for the defendants.

Pike, J.

There was no evidence upon which a jury could properly find that the plaintiff’s intestate was ignorant of any fact material to his safety.

*Verdict set aside : judgment for the defendants.*

Wallace, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
### §114. General pay limitation

Notwithstanding any provision of law, other than the provisions of this chapter, no employee of the White House Office, the Executive Residence at the White House, the Domestic Policy Staff, or the Office of Administration, nor any employee under the Vice President appointed under section 106 of this title, may be paid at a rate of basic pay in excess of the minimum rate of basic pay then currently paid for GS–16 of the General Schedule of section 5332 of title 5.

(Added Pub. L. 95–570, §3(a), Nov. 2, 1978, 92 Stat. 2450.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to any fiscal year beginning on or after Oct. 1, 1978, see section 6(a) of Pub. L. 95–570, set out as an Effective Date of 1978 Amendment note under section 102 of this title.

#### References in Other Laws to GS–16, 17, or 18 Pay Rates

References in laws to the rates of pay for GS–16, 17, or 18, or to maximum rates of pay under the General Schedule, to be considered references to rates payable under specified sections of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, see section 529 [title I, §101(c)(1)] of Pub. L. 101–509, set out in a note under section 5376 of Title 5.
§ 791.105 Initial determination. ( a ) If, after the consultation required by § 791.104, the Secretary determines that the ICTS Transaction does not meet the criteria set forth in § 791.103(c): ( 1 ) The transaction shall no longer be under review; and
( 2 ) Future review of the transaction shall not be precluded, where additional information becomes available to the Secretary.
( b ) If, after the consultation required by § 791.104, the Secretary determines that the ICTS Transaction meets the criteria set forth in § 791.103(c), the Secretary shall: ( 1 ) Make an initial written determination, which shall be dated and signed by the Secretary, that: ( i ) Explains why the ICTS Transaction meets the criteria set forth in § 791.103(c); and
( ii ) Sets forth whether the Secretary has initially determined to prohibit the ICTS Transaction or to propose mitigation measures, by which the ICTS Transaction may be permitted; and
( 2 ) Notify the parties to the ICTS Transaction either through publication in the Federal Register or by serving a copy of the initial determination on the parties via registered U.S. mail, facsimile, and electronic transmission, or third-party commercial carrier, to an addressee's last known address or by personal delivery.
( c ) Notwithstanding the fact that the initial determination to prohibit or propose mitigation measures on an ICTS Transaction may, in whole or in part, rely upon classified national security information, or sensitive but unclassified information, the initial determination will contain no classified national security information, nor reference thereto, and, at the Secretary's discretion, may not contain sensitive but unclassified information.
[86 FR 4923, Jan. 19, 2021. Redesignated and amended at 89 FR 58265, July 18, 2024]
##### 



Exhibit 23.2

Consent of Independent Auditors

To The Board of Directors
TeleCommunication Systems (Holdings) Ltd



We consent to the incorporation, as exhibit 99.01 in
December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of TeleCommunication Systems Inc,
of our report dated March 3, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance
sheet of TeleCommunication Systems (Holdings) Ltd and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2005 and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2005.



| | /s/ James & Cowper
| | ------------------

James & Cowper
Phoenix House
Bartholomew St
Newbury
RG14 5QA
England

March 14, 2006
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-40718

Summary Calendar

 

JESSE RAY MILES, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ROGER WEST ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:95-CV-90

- - - - - - - - - -

July 17, 1996

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jesse Ray Miles, Jr., TDCJ No. 638526, appeals the dismissal

with prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action following a bench

trial conducted by the magistrate judge. The magistrate judge

did not err by entering a dismissal with prejudice in this action

instead of a dismissal without prejudice. See Baris v. Sulpicio

Lines, Inc., 74 F.3d 567, (5th Cir. 1996). Since Miles received

a bench trial, the magistrate judge obviously construed Miles’

pleadings to state a claim against the defendants.
No. 95-40718

- 2 -

The magistrate judge did not err by refusing to appoint

counsel for Miles. See Ulmer v. Chancellor, 691 F.2d 209, 212

(5th Cir. 1982). Because Miles participated in the bench trial

without objecting and reminding the magistrate judge of his jury

request, he is barred from raising the issue on appeal. Matter

of Wynn, 889 F.2d 644, 646 (5th Cir. 1989). The defendants did

not violate Miles’ due process rights by placing him into

solitary confinement for two months. See Sandin v. Conner, 115

S. Ct. 2293, 2300 (1995). Miles’ appeal is DISMISSED as

frivolous. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

We warn Miles that the filing of future frivolous appeals

will result in sanctions. E.g., Smith v. McCleod, 946 F.2d 417,

418 (5th Cir. 1991); Jackson v. Carpenter, 921 F.2d 68, 69 (5th

Cir. 1991). If Miles has any other appeals pending in this court

at this time, he should review them in light of the foregoing

warning and move to withdraw any appeal that is frivolous.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
§ 970.300 Purposes and definitions. ( a ) This subpart sets forth the procedures which the Administrator will apply to applications filed with NOAA covering areas of the deep seabed where the applicants have engaged in exploration prior to June 28, 1980, and to the resolution of conflicts arising out of such applications. This subpart also establishes the date on which NOAA will begin to accept applications or amendments filed by new entrants, and certain other procedures for new entrants.
( b ) For the purposes of this subpart the term: ( 1 ) *Amendment* means an amendment to an application which changes the area applied for;
( 2 ) *Application* means an application for an exploration license which is filed pursuant to the Act and this subpart;
( 3 ) *Conflict* means the existence of more than one application or amendment with the same priority of right: ( i ) Which are filed with the Administrator or with the Administrator and a reciprocating state; and
( ii ) In which the deep seabed areas applied for overlap in whole or part, to the extent of the overlap;
( 4 ) *Original conflict* means a conflict solely between or among applications;
( 5 ) *New conflict* means a conflict between or among amendments filed after July 22, 1982, and on or before October 15, 1982;
( 6 ) *Domestic conflict* means a conflict solely between or among applications or amendments which have been filed with the Administrator.
( 7 ) *International conflict* means a conflict arising between or among applications or amendments filed with the Administrator and a reciprocating state.
NRC COMPLETES FY12 NUCLEAR EDUCATION GRANT AWARDS AND

ANNOUNCES FY13 FEDERAL FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES

With the issuance this week of an additional $3.7 million in grants, the NRC has awarded 

approximately $18.6 million to academic institutions in fiscal year 2012 through the Nuclear 

Education Program. The grants are used for scholarship, fellowship, trade school and community 

college scholarship, faculty development and curricula development. The NRC also announced 

the availability of its FY 2013 funding opportunities, with deadlines the first week in October.

Congress authorized the NRC, through the Nuclear Education Program, to provide 

federal funding opportunities to qualified academic institutions to encourage careers and research 

in nuclear, mechanical and electrical engineering, health physics and related fields to meet 

expected future workforce needs. This fiscal year, the NRC awarded 75 grants to 55 higher 

education institutions located in 29 states and Puerto Rico. These grants will help to develop a 

future workforce capable of designing, constructing, operating and regulating the next generation 

of nuclear facilities.

The NRC announces grant opportunities on www.Grants.gov, which helps the public find 

and apply for federal funding opportunities. A panel of NRC staff and expert reviewers from 

academia and industry reviews all the grant proposals. The panel composition is diverse with 

most reviewers having both experience reviewing proposals for government agencies and 

advanced credentials in nuclear engineering, health physics, radiochemistry or related disciples. 

Each panelist has to certify that they do not have any conflict of interests for the proposals they 

evaluate.

The complete list of grants awarded is posted on the NRC’s website along with more 

information on the NRC’s Nuclear Education Program and future grant opportunities.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC’s website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 12-101 September 10, 2012