alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.5


Hexcel Corporation


Director Compensation Program


(as of May 10, 2007)


Each
member of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Hexcel Corporation (the “Company”)
who is not an employee of the Company (each a “Non-employee Director”) shall
receive compensation for such person’s services as a member of the Board as
outlined in this Director Compensation Program.


Cash Compensation


Annual Retainer Fees


·                  Annual
retainer fee in the amount of $30,000


·                  Additional
annual retainer fee in the amount of $5,000 for the Chairman of each standing
committee of the Board other than the Audit Committee


·                  Additional
annual retainer fee in the amount of $10,000 for the Chairman of the Audit
Committee


Meeting Fees


·                  Fee
in the amount of $1,500 for attending any meeting of the Board in person


·                  Fee
in the amount of $750 for attending any meeting of the Board by telephone


·                  Fee
in the amount of $750 for attending any meeting of any committee of the Board,
whether in person or by telephone


Equity Compensation


Upon
(1) initial election to the Board and (2) upon re-election to the Board and
effective as of the date of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders each year, each
Non-employee Director shall be awarded a grant of Restricted Stock Units (RSUs)
on the following basis:


·                  The
aggregate value of each grant shall be set at $50,000, but shall be reviewed
and is subject to change by the Compensation Committee from time to time based
on the advice of its independent compensation consultant and other factors it
deems relevant.


·                  Each
RSU shall have a value equal to the closing price of a share of common stock on
the date of grant.


·                  The
RSUs shall vest ratably on a daily basis over the one year period beginning on
the grant date, and will convert into an equal number of shares of common stock
on the first anniversary of the date of grant.













·                  Each
director will have the option to elect to defer conversion of the RSUs until
such time as the director leaves the Board. 
With respect to grants upon initial election to the Board, such election
must be made prior to the date of grant. 
With respect to grants upon re-election to the Board, such election must
be made by December 31 of the year prior to the year in which the grant is
awarded. This will defer conversion, but not vesting.


·                  The
RSUs will be issued under a Restricted Stock Unit Agreement in a form approved
by the Compensation Committee from time to time. The appropriate officers of
the Company have the authority to make changes to the form of Restricted Stock
Unit Agreement to preserve the tax deferred nature of any deferral election by
a director in accordance with the requirements of the American Jobs Creation
Act of 2004.



 2
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 10-201.35 

________________________________________________________________________ 

MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE 

 Instrument Amending the Treaty of 

January 18, 2001 Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and IRELAND 

Signed at Dublin July 14, 2005 

with 

Annex 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 IRELAND 

 Mutual Legal Assistance 

Instrument amending the treaty of January 18, 2001. 

Signed at Dublin July 14, 2005; 

Transmitted by the President of the United States of America 

 to the Senate September 28, 2006 (Treaty Doc. 109-13, 

 109th Congress, 2d Session); 

Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations 

 July 29, 2008 (Senate Executive Report No. 110-13, 

 110th Congress, 2d Session); 

Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate 

 September 23, 2008; 

Ratified by the President December 11, 2008; 

Exchange of Diplomatic Notes at Washington 

 August 11 and 12, 2009; 

Entered into force February 1, 2010. 

With annex. 























NOTE: This page should be numbered "24".
No. II-13-021 April 21, 2013

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416

NRC MONITORS SECURITY EVENT AT WATTS BAR NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II staff is monitoring the Watts Bar nuclear 

power plant as a result of a security incident just before 2 a.m. The NRC has staffed its incident 

response center in the Region II office in Atlanta and is monitoring the events along with the 

resident inspector who has responded to the site. 

The Tennessee Valley Authority, which operates the Watts Bar plant, notified the NRC 

that a security officer patrolling on TVA property near the Tennessee River exchanged gunfire 

with an individual. This location is outside the plant’s protected area. The officer was not injured 

and local law enforcement is assisting in the response to the incident. The incident occurred more 

than a quarter mile from the plant’s protected area and the plant remains secure.

As a result of the incident, the Watts Bar plant staff declared an unusual event, the lowest 

of the NRC’s four emergency classifications. 

The Watts Bar plant is located near Spring City, Tenn., about 60 miles southwest of 

Knoxville. Watts Bar Unit 1 is at 100 percent power and Unit 2 is under construction.

###

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave. NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21 - 0574

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MALINDA CRAZYMULE,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of r ecord and to the Honorable Nickolas C. Murnion , Di strict Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 13 2023

12/13/2023
Case Number: DA 21-0574
### SUBCHAPTER III—PAY FOR PHYSICIANS, PODIATRISTS, AND DENTISTS

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This subchapter was originally added by Pub. L. 102–40, May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 187, and amended by Pub. L. 102–405, Oct. 9, 1992, 106 Stat. 1972; Pub. L. 104–262, Oct. 9, 1996, 110 Stat. 3177; Pub. L. 103–446, Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4645; Pub. L. 106–419, Nov. 1, 2000, 114 Stat. 1822. This subchapter is shown here, however, as having been added by Pub. L. 108–445, §3(b), Dec. 3, 2004, 118 Stat. 2636, without reference to those intervening amendments because of the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 108–445.

#### Amendments

2019—Pub. L. 116–12, §1(b)(3), Apr. 8, 2019, 133 Stat. 845, inserted ", PODIATRISTS," after "PHYSICIANS" in subchapter heading.

2004—Pub. L. 108–445, §3(b), Dec. 3, 2004, 118 Stat. 2636, substituted "PAY FOR PHYSICIANS AND DENTISTS" for "SPECIAL PAY FOR PHYSICIANS AND DENTISTS" in subchapter heading.
No. IV-12-022

Contact: Victor Dricks (817) 200-1128

 Lara Uselding (817) 200-1519

 June 15,2012 

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD OPEN HOUSE JUNE 26 FOR WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will host an open house on June 26 in Burlington, 

Kan., to discuss the agency’s assessment of safety performance last year at the Wolf Creek 

nuclear plant. 

The open house is informal and will be held from 6 to 8 p.m. in the Kelly Park 4-H Bldg., 

625 South Third St. in Burlington. The plant is operated by the Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating 

Co., and is located near Burlington.

“The NRC continually reviews the safety performance of Wolf Creek and each of the 

nation’s commercial nuclear power plants,” said Region IV Administrator Elmo E. Collins. 

“This meeting will allow us to speak directly with the local community about the plant’s 

performance last year and the NRC’s actions to make sure the plant continues to operate safely, 

including the additional inspections performed during 2011 in response to the events at 

Fukushima Daiichi to evaluate the safety of U.S. nuclear plants. Those reviews showed that Wolf 

Creek and other U.S. plants continue to operate safely. ” 

A letter sent from the NRC Region IV office to plant officials will serve as the basis for 

the meeting discussion. It is available on the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/wc_2011q4.pdf.

The NRC said Wolf Creek operated safely during 2011 and will receive the very detailed 

inspection regime during 2012 used by the NRC for plants that are operating well. These 

inspections are performed by resident inspectors stationed at the plant and by specialists from the 

Region IV office in Arlington, Texas. The NRC is monitoring the licensee’s efforts to deal with 

issues regarding human performance and problem identification.

Current performance information for Wolf Creek is available on the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/WC/wc_chart.html.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV

 1600 E. Lamar Blvd.

 Arlington, TX 76011 - 4125

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov
#### § 746.10 [Reserved]
#### Frank Gerald KRUGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 01-16863.

D.C. No. CV-01-00590-RLH.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 13, 2002 *.

Decided May 28, 2002.

*666Before FERNANDEZ, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Frank Gerald Kruger appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing his action, which challenged the collection of federal taxes. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, *see Hughes v. United, States,*953 F.2d 531, 535 (9th Cir.1992), and we affirm.

The district court lacked jurisdiction over Kruger’s claim challenging the garnishment of wages because the claim addressed the merits of the underlying tax assessment. *See Huff v. United States,*10 F.3d 1440, 1445 (9th Cir.1993).

The district court lacked jurisdiction over Kruger’s claims for injunctive relief because legal actions filed to enjoin the Internal Revenue Service from the collection of taxes are barred by the Anti Injunction Act, 26 U.S.C. § 7421, and no exceptions applied. *See Hughes,*953 F.2d at 535.

The district court lacked jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1346 because Kruger did not fully pay the assessment. *See Flora v. United States,*362 U.S. 145, 146, 80 S.Ct. 630, 4 L.Ed.2d 623 (1960).

Kruger’s remaining contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
NRC CHAIRMAN JACZKO TO VISIT INDIA NOV. 14-18

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chairman Gregory B. Jaczko will lead a fiveperson NRC delegation to visit New Delhi, Mumbai, and Chennai in India, Nov. 14-18 to take 

part in meetings with the Indian Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB), other Government of 

India agencies, and visit a variety of nuclear facilities. The visit is to exchange information and 

share experience on safety standards and regulation for the safe operation of nuclear power 

plants.

The NRC delegation will visit the nuclear power plants in Tarapur (Tarapur Atomic 

Power Station) and Chennai (Madras Atomic Power Station), and laboratories at the Bhabba 

Atomic Research Centre in Mumbai and the Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research in 

Chennai. While there, the Chairman will meet with appropriate Indian Government officials, 

and staff of nuclear agencies and organizations.

“I look forward to the continuation and advancement of our long-term relationships with 

our AERB Indian counterparts and with other Indian organizations in the area of nuclear safety,” 

said Chairman Jaczko.

Prior to the Chairman’s visit, a nine-member technical delegation from NRC (including 

two from the Chairman’s group) will travel to New Delhi to participate in the 21st International 

Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT) being held at the India 

Habitat Centre Nov. 6-11, 2011 . The main SMiRT conference will be held in New Delhi 

Nov. 6-11, followed by post-conference seminars in Mumbai and Tamil Nadu on Nov. 14-15 on 

topics that include advances in seismic design of structures, innovative fast reactor design, and 

high temperature design reactors.

The 21st SMiRT will be dedicated to the art, science and practice of nuclear structural 

mechanics. It will feature seminars on the mechanics of materials; fracture mechanics and 

structural integrity; design and construction issues; safety, reliability, risk and margins; issues 

related to reactor operations, inspection, and maintenance; fuel cycle facilities, waste 

management, and decommissioning; and the challenges of new reactors.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-209 November 4, 2011
### **CHAPTER 112—VICTIM COMPENSATION AND ASSISTANCE**

Sec.
10601 to 10605.
Transferred.
10606.
Repealed.
10607 to 10609.
Transferred.
#### Albert W. Herrigel, Respondent, v. Max Greenan et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Marimac Novelty Co., Appellants.

No opinion. Carswell, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and Mac Crate, JJ., concur.
### Part B—Relationship to Other Laws; Regulatory References; Effective Date; Reports
### SUBCHAPTER IV—ENERGY SAVINGS IN GOVERNMENT AND PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS
No. IV-11-027

Contact: Victor Dricks (817) 860-8128

 Lara Uselding (817) 276-6519

 

 June 14, 2011 

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

NRC TO DISCUSS 2010 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

FOR COLUMBIA GENERATING STATION 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled an open house for June 21, in 

Richland, Wa., and will be available to discuss the agency=s 2010 assessment of safety 

performance for the Columbia Generating Station. The plant, located near Richland, is operated 

by Energy Northwest.

The open house is informal and scheduled to begin at 6 p.m. at Energy Northwest’s 

Business Services Center, 3000 George Washington Way, Richland.

There will be no formal presentation by NRC staff at the meeting. The NRC staff will be 

available to answer questions from the public on the safety performance of Columbia Generating 

Station, as well as the NRC=s role in ensuring safe plant operation.

 AThe NRC continually reviews the performance of Columbia Generating Station and the 

nation=s other commercial nuclear power facilities,@ NRC Region IV Administrator Elmo E. 

Collins said. AThis meeting will provide an opportunity for a discussion of our annual assessment 

of safety performance with the company and with local officials and residents who live near the 

plant.@

The NRC said the Columbia Generating Station operated safely during 2010 and will 

receive the detailed inspection regime during 2011 used by the NRC for plants that are operating 

safely. Inspections are performed by two NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant and by 

inspection specialists from the Region IV Office in Arlington, Texas.

A letter sent from the NRC Region IV office to plant officials addresses the performance 

of the plant during 2010 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on 

the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/wnp_2010q4.pdf.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125

Telephone: (817) 860-8128

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov
Current performance information for Columbia Generating Station is available on the 

NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/WASH2/wash2_chart.html.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.
NRC CHAIRMAN GREGORY B. JACZKO’S REMARKS AT 

TODAY’S MEETING ON THE FUEL CYCLE OVERSIGHT PROCESS 

Note: The Commission was briefed today by staff and external stakeholders on efforts to improve 

NRC oversight of fuel cycle facilities. 

 Good morning. The Commission meets today to discuss the agency’s oversight approach 

for fuel cycle facilities. I would like to welcome Commissioner Apostolakis to his first 

Commission meeting in his new role. As a former member and Chairman of the Advisory 

Committee on Reactor Safeguards, Commissioner Apostolakis is certainly no stranger to these 

meetings. The Commission will benefit greatly from his experience, expertise, and insights. I am 

pleased to be able to announce that this is the first meeting in several years in which the 

Commission will be operating at full strength with five Commissioners. 

 In recent years, the NRC has been working to revise our oversight approach for fuel cycle 

facilities to make it more risk-informed and performance-based. As I see it, greater predictability 

and transparency have been the core principles behind this ongoing effort. The staff recently 

provided a proposal to the Commission to develop a fuel cycle oversight process. Under the 

proposed approach, the agency would conduct a baseline inspection program, assess identified 

problems by their safety significance, and determine what actions to take on the basis of that 

assessment. During today’s meeting, the Commission will try to flesh out the specifics of the 

staff’s recommendations in order to act on the staff’s proposal. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-077 April 29, 2010
##### 



Exhibit 13.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the U.S. Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: June 16, 2006
    
    By:       /s/ Byung-Moo ParkName: Byung-Moo ParkTitle:   Chief Executive OfficerDate: June 16, 2006
    
    By:       /s/ Janice LeeName: Janice LeeTitle:   Chief Financial Officer
H. R. 2533

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the seventh day of January, two thousand and three

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 10701

Abercorn Street in Savannah, Georgia, as the ‘‘J.C. Lewis, Jr. Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

10701 Abercorn Street in Savannah, Georgia, shall be known and

designated as the ‘‘J.C. Lewis, Jr. Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘J.C. Lewis,

Jr. Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.