alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 400
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 400 appear at 78 FR 69289, Nov. 19, 2013.

§ 400.46 Grantee liability. ( a ) *Exemption from liability.* A grant of authority, *per se,* shall not be construed to make the zone grantee liable for violations by zone participants. The role of the zone grantee under the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations is to provide general management of the zone to ensure that the reasonable needs of the business community are served. It would not be in the public interest to discourage public entities from zone sponsorship because of concern about liability without fault.
( b ) *Exception to exemption from liability.* A grantee could create liability for itself that otherwise would not exist if the grantee undertakes detailed operational oversight of or direction to zone participants. Examples of detailed operational oversight or direction include review of an operator's inventory-control or record-keeping systems, specifying requirements for such a system to be used by an operator, and review of CBP documentation related to an operator's zone receipts and shipments.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 25 (Friday, February 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 5873]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2588]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463 as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research (DMR) 
<greek-i>1203.
    Dates & Times: March 3, 2004; 8 a.m.--6 p.m. (open 10:45-12, 
1:15-4:30). March 4, 2004; 8 a.m.--4 p.m. (open 9:45-10:45).
    Place: Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
    Type of Meeting: Part open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Ulrich Strom, Program Director, Materials 
Research Science and Engineering Centers, Division of Materials 
Research, Room 1065, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, telephone (703) 292-4938.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning progress of Materials Research Science and Engineering 
Center and future funding decisions.
    Agenda: March 3, 2004--Open for Director's overview of Materials 
Research Science and Engineering Center and presentations. March 4, 
2004--Closed to review and evaluate progress of Materials Research 
Science and Engineering Center.
    Reason for Closing: The work being reviewed may include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: February 3, 2004.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-2588 Filed 2-5-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### *By* Rick Saltus, Pat Hill, Gerry Connard, Travis Hudson, *and* Adrienne Barnett

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and NoticesU.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
      URL: https://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/of/1999/ofr-99-0418/
Questions or Assistance: USGS Web Contact
Page Last Modified: Wed Dec  7 17:01 EDT 2016
§ 890.107 Court review. ( a ) A suit to compel enrollment under § 890.102 must be brought against the employing office that made the enrollment decision.
( b ) A suit to review the legality of OPM's regulations under this part must be brought against the Office of Personnel Management.
( c ) Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) carriers resolve FEHB claims under authority of Federal statute (5 U.S.C. chapter 89). A covered individual may seek judicial review of OPM's final action on the denial of a health benefits claim. A legal action to review final action by OPM involving such denial of health benefits must be brought against OPM and not against the carrier or carrier's subcontractors. The recovery in such a suit shall be limited to a court order directing OPM to require the carrier to pay the amount of benefits in dispute.
( d ) An action under paragraph (c) of this section to recover on a claim for health benefits: ( 1 ) May not be brought prior to exhaustion of the administrative remedies provided in § 890.105;
( 2 ) May not be brought later than December 31 of the 3rd year after the year in which the care or service was provided; and
( 3 ) Will be limited to the record that was before OPM when it rendered its decision affirming the carrier's denial of benefits.
( e ) A suit for equitable relief founded on 5 U.S.C. chapter 89 that is based on 5 U.S.C. 8902(p) and is governed by 5 CFR part 890 must be brought against OPM by December 31 of the 3rd year after the year in which disputed services were rendered.
[61 FR 15179, Apr. 5, 1996, as amended at 86 FR 36947, July 13, 2021]
1

Chappell, Regina

From: Sasser, Erika

Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2015 11:00 AM

To: Chappell, Regina

Subject: FW: Part of E.O. 12866 Review: Ozone NAAQS NFR and RIA Briefings RIN2060-AP38

Attachments: EO12866_Ozone_NAAQS_NFR_RIN2060_AP38_9_3_15_Overview.pdf; EO12866

_Ozone_NAAQS_FINAL_RIA_Briefing_RIN2060_AP38_09_03_2015.pdf

For ozone docket.  thanks

From: Sasser, Erika  

Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 11:02 AM

To: 'Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov'

Cc: Wesson, Karen; Weatherhead, Darryl; Langdon, Robin; Stone, Susan; Shepherd, Eloise

Subject: Part of E.O. 12866 Review: Ozone NAAQS NFR and RIA Briefings RIN2060‐AP38

Aaron—

Attached please find the briefings for today’s meetings on the Ozone NAAQS NFR and RIA.  Please let me know if you

have any questions.

Thanks,

Erika
#### Robert A. Wilkinson, Appellant, v. Nassau Shores, Inc., et al., Respondents, and John P. McKenna, Appellant.

Present — Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ. Motion for reargument denied, with $10 costs. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Johnston, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ. [See 278 App. Div. 970.]
###### Editorial Note on Part 922

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

#### § 922.227 Effect on affected federally recognized Nations and Tribes.

The exercise of treaty rights for federally recognized Nations and Tribes and their citizens is not modified, altered, or in any way affected by the regulations promulgated in this subpart. The Director shall consult with the governing body of each federally-recognized Nation and Tribe protected by the 1794 Treaty of Canandaigua regarding any matter which might affect the ability of the Nation and Tribe's citizens to participate in activities protected by that treaty in the Sanctuary.
KAZAKHSTAN: INVESTMENT PROJECTS IN THE TRANSPORT &TELECOMMUNICATION SECTORS - OPPORTUNITIES FOR U.S. COMPANIES

----

13 MAY 98
#### Betty-Jane H. Bauman, as Executrix of Bernard E. Bauman, Deceased, Respondent-Appellant, v. Town of Irondequoit, Appellant, and Laurelton Fire District of the Town of Irondequoit, Respondent.

Order affirmed, without costs of these appeals to any party. Memorandum: We think the decisions in *Bloom,*v. *Jewish Bd. of Guardians*(286 N. Y. 349); *Holmes*v. *County of Erie*(266 App. Div. 220, affd. 291 N. Y. 798), and *Bernardine*v. *City of New York*(294 N. Y. 361) which applied the waiver of immunity in the Court of Claims Act to municipalities overrules the decision in *Ottmann*v. *Village of Rockville Centre*(273 N. Y. 205) insofar as that decision might be held to bar the action against the defendant town. All concur. (In an action to recover damages for the death of plaintiff’s intestate, appeal by defendant town from part of an order denying its motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint; appeal by plaintiff from part of the same order which granted a motion by defendant fire district to dismiss the complaint as to it.) Present — MeCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ. [204 Mise. 494.] [See 283 App. Div. 767, 848.]
Searched for **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/EN-05-10058.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/EN-05-10058.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
#### § 970.700 General.

Congress, in authorizing the exploration for hard mineral resources under the Act, also enacted provisions relating to the protection of the marine environment from the effects of exploration activities. For example, before the Administrator may issue a license, pursuant to section 105(a)(4) of the Act he must find that the exploration proposed in an application cannot reasonably be expected to result in a significant adverse effect on the quality of the environment. Also, the Act requires in section 109(b) that each license issued by the Administrator must contain such terms, conditions and restrictions which prescribe the actions the licensee must take in the conduct of exploration activities to assure protection of the environment. Furthermore, the Act in section 105(c)(1)(B) provides for the modification by the Administrator of any term, condition or restriction if relevant data and other information indicates that modification is required to protect the quality of the environment. In addition, section 114 of the Act specifies that each license issued under the Act must require the licensee to monitor the environmental effects of the exploration activities in accordance with guidelines issued by the Administrator, and to submit such information as the Administrator finds to be necessary and appropriate to assess environmental impacts and to develop and evaluate possible methods of mitigating adverse environmental effects.
#### Ray F. Dillenbeck et al., Appellants, v. State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 27865.)

Present — 'Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Deyo and Santry, JJ. [193 Misc. 542.]
**Exhibit
      32.2**





Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§1350)





I,
      Michael A. Reisner, Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
      Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of ICON Capital Corp.,
      the Manager of the Registrant in connection with the Quarterly Report of ICON
      Income Fund Ten, LLC (the "LLC") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March
      31,
      2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the "Quarterly Report") certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





1.
            The
                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                13(a) or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m);
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
                all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                the LLC.








*Dated:
      December 11, 2007*





*/s/Michael A. Reisner*


Michael
      A. Reisner


Director,
      Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Manager


(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)


ICON
      Capital Corp.


Manager
      of ICON Income Fund Ten, LLC
### Substantive Requirements #4
Copy of GRIC's Air Quality MonitoringNetwork SeeAttachment: 

# + SeeAir Quality Data Summaries (Support Docs #1) 

# + GRIC QAPP (Region IX ofice) 

# + Letter Approving GRIC QAPP for Monitoring 

## + Region IX Audit of GRIC Monitoring Network (Region IX Office)
### §1506. Authorization of appropriations

Necessary amounts may be appropriated to carry out this chapter.

(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3700.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1506 | 41:422(l). | Pub. L. 93–400, §26(l), as added Pub. L. 100–679, §5(a), Nov. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 4063. |

Section
## COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00289

- CV

CASEY GARZA APPELLANT

V.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A

. APPELLEE

------------
FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 2014

- 001191

- 1

------------


### MEMORA NDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

------------ On September 9, 2014

, and September 24, 2014, we notified appellant in

accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c) that we would dismiss this
appeal unless the $1 9 5 filing fee was paid. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).

Appellant has not paid the $1 9 5 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2 Because appellant failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of

appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court ’s order of August 16 , 20 13

, 2

we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: October 30, 3014

2 See Supreme Court of Tex., Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals

, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi

- district Litigation , Misc. Docket No. 13

- 9127 (Aug. 16 , 20 13 ) (listing fees in courts of appeals).
§ 930.46 Supplemental coordination for proposed activities. ( a ) For proposed Federal agency activities that were previously determined by the State agency to be consistent with the management program, but which have not yet begun, Federal agencies shall further coordinate with the State agency and prepare a supplemental consistency determination if the proposed activity will affect any coastal use or resource substantially different than originally described. Substantially different coastal effects are reasonably foreseeable if: ( 1 ) The Federal agency makes substantial changes in the proposed activity that are relevant to management program enforceable policies; or
( 2 ) There are significant new circumstances or information relevant to the proposed activity and the proposed activity's effect on any coastal use or resource.
( 3 ) Substantial changes were made to the activity during the period of the State agency's initial review and the State agency did not receive notice of the substantial changes during its review period, and these changes are relevant to management program enforceable policies and/or affect coastal uses or resources.
( b ) The State agency may notify the Federal agency and the Director of proposed activities which the State agency believes should be subject to supplemental coordination. The State agency's notification shall include information supporting a finding of substantially different coastal effects than originally described and the relevant enforceable policies, and may recommend modifications to the proposed activity (if any) that would allow the Federal agency to implement the proposed activity consistent with the enforceable policies of the management program. State agency notification under this paragraph (b) does not remove the requirement under paragraph (a) of this section for Federal agencies to notify State agencies.
[65 FR 77154, Dec. 8, 2000, as amended at 71 FR 828, Jan. 5, 2006]
§ 971.208 Fee. ( a ) *General.* Section 104 of the Act provides that no application for the issuance or transfer of a permit will be certified unless the applicant pays to NOAA an administrative fee which reflects the reasonable administrative costs incurred in reviewing and processing the application.
( b ) *Amount.* A fee payment of $100,000, payable to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Department of Commerce, must accompany each application. If the administrative costs of reviewing and processing the application are significantly less than or in excess of $100,000, the Administrator, after determining the amount of the under- or over-charge, as applicable, will refund the difference or require the applicant to pay the additional amount before issuance or transfer of the permit. In the case of an application for transfer of a permit to, or for a significant change to a permit held by, an entity which has previously been found qualified for a permit, the Administrator may reduce the fee in advance by an appropriate amount which reflects costs avoided by reliance on previous findings made in relation to the proposed transferee.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BeestonEnterprises Ltd, a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB forthe quarter ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the "Report"), I, Brian Smith, President/CEO of the Company,certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.Section 1350), that to my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations ofthe Company. 

 

 

***/s/ Brian Smith                               ***

Brian Smith, President, CEO

Dated: November 7, 2005                   

----

 

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BeestonEnterprises Ltd, a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB forthe quarter ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the "Report"), I, Cindy Watt, Secretary/CFO of the Company, certify,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section1350), that to my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations ofthe Company. 

 

 

***/s/ Cindy Watt                               ***

Cindy Watt, Secretary, CFO

Dated: November 7, 2005               

 

----
---

Section 1350 Certifications

CERTIFICATE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

I, Jerry Dibble, a Director and President, who also
performs the function of Principal Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of Capital Mineral Investors, Inc. (the
Corporation), certify that the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report")
for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof:

|1. | fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and                                       
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                    
|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Corporation.

|(Signature) | /s/
      Jerry Dibble                                                                           | 
|----------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|            | Jerry Dibble                                                                                       | 
|(Title)     | President and Director (also performs the
      function of Principal Executive Officer, Principal | 
|            | Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
      Officer)                                          | 
|            |                                                                                                    | 
|(Date)      | August 13, 2008                                                                                    | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Corporation and will be retained by the Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John B. Simpson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of FoxHollow Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of FoxHollow Technologies, Inc.

Date: May 9, 2007



By:

/s/ JOHN B. SIMPSONJohn B. SimpsonChief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
NRC MONITORS PILGRIM STATION AFTER LOSS OF OFFSITE POWER AND 

UNUSUAL EVENT DECLARATION

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I staff is monitoring the Pilgrim 

nuclear power plant after the site lost offsite power Friday evening. The plant is operated by 

Entergy Nuclear and is located in Plymouth, Mass.

Pilgrim automatically shut down after losing offsite power at 9:17 Friday night (2/8). The 

plant is stable and all plant safety systems responded as designed. The plant's diesel generators 

are currently supplying power to plant equipment. Plant operators declared an unusual event due 

to the loss of all off-site power. An Unusual Event is the lowest of four levels of the NRC’s 

emergency classification system.

There was no impact to plant workers or the public.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES link on the 

NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's 

website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region I 

2100 Renaissance Blvd., King of Prussia, Pa. 19406-2713

E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov 

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. I-13-003

Contact: Diane Screnci (610) 337-5330

 Neil Sheehan (610) 337-5331

February 9, 2013 

Email: opa1.resource@nrc.gov
Issue Date: 10/16/2012 1 12-024 

 NRC INSPECTION MANUAL DIRS 

Change Notice 12-024

 DELETED: TRANSMITTED: 

 Number Date Number Date

1. IP 41502 10/15/12 

2. TI 2600/015 09/30/11 

3. 

TRAINING: No. 

REMARKS: IP 41502, “Nuclear Power Plant Simulation Facilities,” is an initial issuance. 

TI 2600/015, “Evaluation of Licensee Strategies for the Prevention and/or 

Mitigation of Emergencies at Fuel Facilities,” has been implemented. 

DISTRIBUTION: Standard. 

END