alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3310. Quantities to order

(a) Factors Affecting Quantity To Order.—Each executive agency shall procure supplies in a quantity that—

(1) will result in the total cost and unit cost most advantageous to the Federal Government, where practicable; and

(2) does not exceed the quantity reasonably expected to be required by the agency.

(b) Offeror's Opinion of Quantity.—Each solicitation for a contract for supplies shall, if practicable, include a provision inviting each offeror responding to the solicitation to state an opinion on whether the quantity of supplies proposed to be procured is economically advantageous to the Federal Government and, if applicable, to recommend a quantity that would be more economically advantageous to the Federal Government. Each recommendation shall include a quotation of the total price and the unit price for supplies procured in each recommended quantity.

(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3761.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3310 | 41:253f. | June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title III, §303F, formerly §303G, as added Pub. L. 98–577, title II, §205(a), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 3073; renumbered §303F, Pub. L. 99–145, title XIII, §1304(c)(4)(A), Nov. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 742. |

Section

In subsection (b), the words "or quantities" are omitted because of 1:1.
### §1709A. Teleconsultation

(a) Teleconsultation.—(1) The Secretary shall carry out an initiative of teleconsultation for the provision of remote mental health and traumatic brain injury assessments in facilities of the Department that are not otherwise able to provide such assessments without contracting with third-party providers or reimbursing providers through a fee basis system.

(2) The Secretary shall, in consultation with appropriate professional societies, promulgate technical and clinical care standards for the use of teleconsultation services within facilities of the Department.

(3) In carrying out an initiative under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall ensure that facilities of the Department are able to provide a mental health or traumatic brain injury assessment to a veteran through contracting with a third-party provider or reimbursing a provider through a fee basis system when—

(A) such facilities are not able to provide such assessment to the veteran without—

(i) such contracting or reimbursement; or

(ii) teleconsultation; and

(B) providing such assessment with such contracting or reimbursement is more clinically appropriate for the veteran than providing such assessment with teleconsultation.

(b) Teleconsultation Defined.—In this section, the term "teleconsultation" means the use by a health care specialist of telecommunications to assist another health care provider in rendering a diagnosis or treatment.

(Added Pub. L. 112–154, title I, §108(a)(1), Aug. 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 1174.)
### §451. Procedure for consideration of alleged violations

The procedure for consideration of alleged violations of part A of subchapter II consists of—

(1) counseling and mediation as provided in section 452; and

(2) election, as provided in section 453, of either—

(A) an administrative proceeding as provided in section 453(1) and judicial review as provided in section 1296 of title 28; or

(B) a civil action in a district court of the United States as provided in section 1346(g) of title 28.

(Added Pub. L. 104–331, §2(a), Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4067.)
Editorial Note on Subpart D of Part 9701
Editorial Note: At 73 FR 58435, Oct. 7, 2008, the application of subpart D to part 9701 was rescinded.

§ 9701.406 Setting and communicating performance expectations. ( a ) Performance expectations must align with and support the DHS mission and its strategic goals, organizational program and policy objectives, annual performance plans, and other measures of performance. Such expectations include those general performance expectations that apply to all employees, such as standard operating procedures, handbooks, or other operating instructions and requirements associated with the employee's job, unit, or function.
( b ) Supervisors and managers must communicate performance expectations, including those that may affect an employee's retention in the job. Performance expectations need not be in writing, but must be communicated to the employee prior to holding the employee accountable for them. However, notwithstanding this requirement, employees are always accountable for demonstrating appropriate standards of conduct, behavior, and professionalism, such as civility and respect for others.
( c ) Performance expectations may take the form of— ( 1 ) Goals or objectives that set general or specific performance targets at the individual, team, and/or organizational level;
( 2 ) Organizational, occupational, or other work requirements, such as standard operating procedures, operating instructions, administrative manuals, internal rules and directives, and/or other instructions that are generally applicable and available to the employee;
( 3 ) A particular work assignment, including expectations regarding the quality, quantity, accuracy, timeliness, and/or other expected characteristics of the completed assignment;
( 4 ) Competencies an employee is expected to demonstrate on the job, and/or the contributions an employee is expected to make; or
( 5 ) Any other means, as long as it is reasonable to assume that the employee will understand the performance that is expected.
( d ) Supervisors must involve employees, insofar as practicable, in the development of their performance expectations. However, final decisions regarding performance expectations are within the sole and exclusive discretion of management.
### §6511. Effect on other law

This chapter may not be construed to modify or amend the following provisions:

(1) Chapter 83 of this title.

(2) Sections 3141 to 3144, 3146, and 3147 of title 40.

(3) Chapter 307 of title 18.

(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3811.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6511 | 41:42. | June 30, 1936, ch. 881, §8, 49 Stat. 2039. |

Section

Paragraph (1) is substituted for "Title III of the act entitled 'An Act making appropriations for the Treasury and Post Office Departments for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1934, and for other purposes', approved May 3, 1933 (commonly known as the Buy American Act)" for consistency in the revised title and to correct an error in the source, which incorrectly gives May 3, 1933, rather than March 3, 1933, as the date of approval.

Paragraph (2) is substituted for "the Act entitled 'An Act relating to the rate of wages for laborers and mechanics employed on public buildings of the United States and the District of Columbia by contractors and subcontractors, and for other purposes', approved March 3, 1931 (commonly known as the Bacon-Davis Act), as amended from time to time" because of section 5(c) of Public Law 107–217 (40 U.S.C. note prec. 101) and for consistency with title 40.

The words "the labor provisions of Title II of the National Industrial Recovery Act, approved June 16, 1933, as extended" are omitted as obsolete because of section 201 of the Act of June 21, 1938 (ch. 554, 52 Stat. 816), as amended by the Acts of June 27, 1940 (ch. 437, 54 Stat. 633), April 5, 1941 (ch. 40, 55 Stat. 110), and June 27, 1942 (ch. 450, 56 Stat. 410).

The words "or [the labor provisions] of section 7 of the Emergency Relief Appropriation Act, approved April 8, 1935" are omitted as obsolete. The intended reference was probably to section 7 of the Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1935 (49 Stat. 118). Section 7 of the Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1935 provided that the President shall require certain rates of pay for persons engaged in carrying out projects that were financed by amounts being appropriated in that Act.

Paragraph (3) is substituted for "the Act entitled 'An Act to provide for the diversification of employment of Federal prisoners, for their training and schooling in trades and occupations, and for other purposes', approved May 27, 1930, as amended and supplemented by the Act approved June 23, 1934" for consistency with title 18. The Act of May 27, 1930 (ch. 340, 46 Stat. 391) and the Act of June 23, 1934 (ch. 736, 48 Stat. 1211), which were classified to sections 744a to 744n of former title 18, were substantially repealed and were replaced by chapter 307 and section 4162 of title 18 in the codification of title 18 by the Act of June 25, 1948 (ch. 645, 62 Stat. 683). Subsequently, section 4162 of title 18 was repealed by section 218(a)(4) of Public Law 98–473 (98 Stat. 2027).
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Fredericka Nuborazek, on Behalf of Herself and Gaylene C. Nuborazek, an Infant, Respondent, against De Witt C. Waterman et al., Doing Business as a Partnership, Respondents, and Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co., Appellant. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Present- — -Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Deyo and Bergan, JJ.
Unassociated Document


    

      Settlement
        and Release Deed

      


      The
        undersigned, Marc Belzberg, hereby confirms as follows:

      


      	1.  	
              I
                have received the amount of $250,000 in cash from SKY MobileMedia,
                Inc.
                (“SKY”) and have received stock of SKY, which is placed in escrow, in the
                value of $350,000 (the “SKY Stock”). 

            


       

      	2.  	
              Other
                than my rights to receive the SKY Stock in accordance with the terms
                of
                the Asset Purchase Agreement between e-SIM Ltd. and SKY dated September
                28, 2006, on my behalf and on behalf of Yozma
                Hofsheet Ltd., a party related to me,
                I
                hereby fully and finally release, acquit and forever discharge e-SIM
                Ltd.,
                its officers, shareholders, employees, affiliates and other related
                parties from any and all actions, debts, claims, counterclaims, demands,
                liabilities, damages, causes of action, costs, expenses, and compensation
                of every kind and nature whatsoever, past or present, at law or in
                equity,
                whether known or unknown, which I or any party related to me, had,
                has, or
                may have had at any time in the past until and including the date
                of this
                letter against e-SIM Ltd., including but not limited to any claims
                which
                relate to any debt of e-SIM Ltd. to me or my related parties or related
                to
                the performance of the Asset Purchase Agreement referenced above.
                

            


       

      In
        witness whereof, I have signed this Settlement and Release Deed on this 12
        day of July 2007

       

       

       

      
        
          

        

      

      Marc
        Belzberg
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2368 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2368

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to tax the campaign 
committees of candidates for State and local public office in the same 
       manner as campaign committees of candidates for Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 5, 2003

Mr. Green of Texas (for himself, Mr. Reyes, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Gonzalez, 
Mr. Rodriguez, Mr. Stenholm, Mr. Ortiz, Mr. Sandlin, Ms. Eddie Bernice 
  Johnson of Texas, Mr. Lampson, Mr. Turner of Texas, Mr. Frost, Mr. 
  Bell, Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas, Mr. Hinojosa, Mr. Doggett, and Mr. 
    Hall) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to tax the campaign 
committees of candidates for State and local public office in the same 
       manner as campaign committees of candidates for Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF SPECIAL RULE FOR PRINCIPAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEES 
              TO CANDIDATES FOR STATE OR LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICE.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (A) of section 527(h)(2) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to principal campaign committee 
defined) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``or for State or local public office'' 
        after ``a candidate for Congress'', and
            (2) in clause (i), by inserting ``in the case of a 
        candidate for Congress,'' before ``section 302(e)''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
http://www.downstreambusiness.com/diesel-fuel-fuels/EIA-Gasoline-Demand-Rise-23-2015-Flat2016_142995

EIA: US Gasoline Demand To Rise 2.3% 

In 2015; Flat In 2016

By Bryan Sims. Published September 11, 2015

U.S gasoline demand, which rose by 80,000 barrels per day (bbl/d) in 2014, is projected to increase 210,000 

bbl/d, or 2.3%, in 2015 as effects of employment growth and lower gasoline prices outweigh increases in 

vehicle-fleet efficiency, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s (EIA) latest “Short-Term 

Energy Outlook” (STEO).

However, gasoline consumption is forecast to remain flat in 2016, as a long-term trend toward vehicles that are 

more fuel efficient offset the effect of continued economic growth on highway travel, the EIA noted in the 

report.

Consumption of distillate fuel, which includes diesel fuel and heating oil, is forecast to be relatively unchanged 

this year and then increase by 60,000 bbl/d, or 1.5%, in 2016. The 2016 growth is driven by increasing 

manufacturing output, foreign trade and marine fuel use, according to the EIA.

Meanwhile, U.S. ethanol production, which averaged 934,000 bbl/d in 2014, is forecast to average more than 

950,000 bbl/d in both 2015 and 2016, the report noted.

Ethanol consumption, which averaged 877,000 bbl/d in 2014, is forecast to average slightly more than 900,000 

bbl/d in both 2015 and 2016, resulting in an average 9.9% ethanol share of the total gasoline pool.

“EIA does not expect significant increases in E15 or E85 consumption over the forecast period,” the 

government’s energy statistics agency said, adding that the proposed multiyear Renewable Fuel Standard 

targets could encourage imports of Brazilian sugarcane ethanol, which were 3,000 bbl/d in 2014.

On May 29, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency proposed a rule setting RFS volumes for 2014 through 

2016. Although these volumes could be modified before the final rule is issued, they were used in developing 

the EIA’s latest STEO report.

The EIA added that the largest effect of the proposed RFS targets will be on biodiesel consumption, which 

contributes to meeting the biomass-based diesel, advanced biofuel and total renewable fuel RFS targets.

Biodiesel production averaged an estimated 81,000 bbl/d in 2014 and is forecast to average 92,000 bbl/d in 

2015 and 98,000 bbl/d in 2016. Net imports of biomass-based diesel are also expected to increase from 15,000 

bbl/d in 2014 to 23,000 bbl/d in 2015, and to 35,000 bbl/d in 2016.

“EIA expects that a combination of higher biomass-based diesel consumption, higher consumption of domestic 

and imported ethanol and banked Renewable Identification Numbers will help meet the newly proposed RFS 

volumes through 2016,” according to the EIA.

Bryan Sims can be reached at bsims@hartenergy.com.
# L_2020275EN.01000101.xml

| 24.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 275/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 275/1

---

Information concerning the entry into force of the Protocol amending the Euro-Mediterranean Aviation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Government of the State of Israel, of the other part, to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia

The Protocol amending the Euro-Mediterranean Aviation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Government of the State of Israel, of the other part, to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia, signed in Brussels on 19 February 2015, entered into force on 2 August 2020, in accordance with Article 3(1) of the Protocol, as the last notification was deposited on 2 July 2020.

---
§ 10.7 Procedure when a recommended standard is not supported by a consensus. If the Department determines that a recommended standard is not supported by a consensus, the Department may: ( a ) Return the recommended standard to the Standard Review Committee for further action, with or without suggestions;
( b ) Terminate the development of the recommended standard under these procedures; or
( c ) Take such other action as it may deem necessary or appropriate under the circumstances.
### §17307. Purchase of insurance

An executive department, independent establishment, agency, wholly owned Government corporation, officer, or employee may expend money, or incur an obligation, for insurance, or for the payment of premiums on insurance, against loss, destruction, or damage in the shipment of valuables only as specifically authorized by the Secretary of the Treasury. The Secretary may give the authorization if the Secretary finds that the risk of loss, destruction, or damage in the shipment cannot be guarded against adequately by the facilities of the Federal Government or that adequate replacement cannot be provided under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1282.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 17307 | 40:726. | July 8, 1937, ch. 444, §4, 50 Stat. 480. |

Section

The words "On and after the effective date of the regulations prescribed under section 721 of this title" are omitted as obsolete. The words "the circumstances are such that" are omitted as unnecessary.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Chester W. Carr, Appellant.

Appeal from an order of Saratoga County Court denying appeb lant’s motion for a writ of *coram nolis.*Order affirmed, without costs. Hill, P, J., Heffeman, Foster, Russell and Deyo, JJ., concur. [See *post,*p. 929.]
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Tranquility, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2007 (the Report), I, Dominick Pope, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  August 18, 2008 /s/Dominick Pope     Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL, INC.                                    Exhibit 10.09
2003 BONUS AWARD PLAN

On March 7, 2003, a 2003 Bonus Award Plan under the 2002 Incentive Plan or any
successor Incentive Plan was approved by the Company's Board of Directors to be
administered by its Compensation Committee. Individuals were nominated and
approved for inclusion in the Plan and reviewed after final results were
completed. Recommendations for cash bonus awards were based on the
accomplishment of results (Individual, Profit Center and Total Company) in order
to determine the amount of award, if any, to be made. Awardees must be amongst
the nominated group for eligibility, and be employed by the Company at the time
of funding. Bonuses are earned when paid. Individuals, as designated, are
subject to a maximum bonus eligibility of 10%-125% of current base salary.

The 2003 Bonus Award Plan is based on achieving specific results by the
Individual, his Profit Center and the Total Company. In order to integrate each
of these performances in a fashion that benefits the Shareholders and Employees,
each item is interrelated. The amount of award recommendation was based on the
following methodology:

Individual Coefficient

The Individual Coefficient is determined by taking the individual's weighted
average evaluation of objectives achieved times the individual's salary maximum.
This is the beginning step in determining the final award. An individual's
performance must meet certain minimum criteria or he is eliminated from bonus
award consideration.

Profit Center Results Contribution

The Profit Center Contribution is determined by comparing the Profit Center Net
Income Objective with the results achieved and determining the Contribution to
the Individual Coefficient.

Should the Profit Center results be below a specified amount, all the
individuals in that Profit Center may be eliminated from the Award Program. The
Chief Executive Officer may review the performance of areas within the region on
a case-by-case basis and take appropriate action. Should the actual results be
equal to or greater than such specified amount, the individual becomes eligible
for an award.

Oceaneering International, Inc. Results Contribution

The Company Results Contribution is determined by comparing the Company's Net
Income Result with the Objective planned. The results achieved determine the
multiplier used. Thus, an individual may, subject to the determined maximum, be
recommended for an award equal to the Individual Coefficient times the Profit
Center Contribution times the Company Results Contribution times current base
salary.

The 2003 Bonus Award Plan is in effect for 2003. It is extremely important that
the Company continue improved results. All participants must be committed to a
reward system based on achieving results. The Company is entrepreneurially
oriented and must use its maximum creativity, effort and determination in
achieving individual results that collectively increases its Shareholders' Net
Wealth. The 2003 Bonus Award Plan is structured to foster that position.
cc: Hon. David B. Barker, District Judge 

Hon. Valerie Adair, District Judge 

Christopher Donald Lomprey 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) I947A