alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Pesticide industry sales andusage [electronic resource]: ... market estimates.**
 
1988 | 1989
1995 | 1996-97 | 1997 | 1998-99 | 1999
2001 | 2007
 
SuDoc Number:EP 5.29:
Item Number:0473-B-20 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000553114
 
February 6, 2020
#### § 908.16 Signature.

All reports filed with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration must be dated and signed by or on behalf of the person conducting or intending to conduct the weather modification activities referred to therein by such person, individually or, in the case of a person other than an individual, by a partner, officer, or other person having corresponding functions and authority. For this purpose “officer” means a president, vice president, treasurer, secretary, or comptroller. Notwithstanding the foregoing, such reports may also be signed by the duly authorized agent or attorney of the person whose activities are being reported. Proof of such authorization shall be furnished to the Administrator when filing a report, unless previously furnished.
#### § 295.23 Dissolution of joint research and development ventures.

Upon dissolution of any joint research and development venture receiving funds under these procedures or at a time otherwise agreed upon, the Federal Government shall be entitled to a share of the residual assets of the joint venture proportional to the Federal share of the costs of the joint venture as determined by independent audit.
No. I-09-036 

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331 

August 4, 2009

E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region I 

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

NRC BOARD ISSUES ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT OF ENFORCEMENT 

PROCEEDING INVOLVING A THOROFARE, N.J., COMPANY 

 A Thoroughfare, N.J., firm, Eastern Testing and Inspection Inc. (ETI), has agreed to pay a 

$4,500 civil penalty, its president will not participate in any work under the jurisdiction of the 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission for six months and a former vice president will not participate in 

such work for a year. 

 The NRC in February proposed more severe penalties – a fine of $13,000 and one year 

suspensions for each individual. The company appealed the NRC’s proposed notice of violation, 

penalties and orders, requiring the creation of an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel. The 

Board accepted a settlement negotiated by the NRC staff and the company in which the two parties 

agreed to disagree about the violations the NRC said occurred, but agreed to a settlement that meets 

NRC’s conditions that the firm take action to ensure the violations do not occur again. 

 The company is required to develop and implement an annual training program that explains 

specific requirements to employees using licensed materials, and to contract with a consultant to 

evaluate the effectiveness of the firm’s security and radiation safety program. In addition, the firm 

agreed it will not possess licensed nuclear materials in New Jersey before Nov. 10, 2009. Company 

president, Himat Soni, agreed not to work with NRC licensed material for six months. The vice 

president, Dhiraj Soni, has since left the firm and will not work with NRC licensed material for a 

year. 

Last February the NRC found ETI deliberately violated agency regulations. Specifically, ETI 

failed to implement a security requirement that required coordination with local law enforcement 

agencies, and failed to provide complete and accurate information to the NRC. The agency concluded 

that the violations were willful. The problems associated with the violations did not involve handling 

of nuclear materials. 

The company has 30 days to pay the reduced penalty. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. 

E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T17:37:45-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
#### Nancy O. de Marigny v. Alfred F. de Marigny.

Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Yan Yoorhis, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 757.]
### §50106. Powers

The corporation has only the powers provided in its bylaws and articles of incorporation filed in each State in which it is incorporated.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1342.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 50106 | 36:3702. | Dec. 9, 1985, Pub. L. 99–172, §2, 99 Stat. 1020. |

Section

The words "and subject to the laws of such State or States" are omitted as unnecessary.
§ 30.8 Time and place for presenting proof of filing citations and exemption legends. The following conditions govern the time and place to present proof of filing citations, postdeparture filing citations, AES downtime filing citation, exemption, or exclusion legends. The USPPI or the authorized agent is required to deliver the proof of filing citations, postdeparture filing citations, AES downtime filing citations, exemption, or exclusion legends required in § 30.7 to the exporting carrier. See appendix B of this part for the properly formatted proof of filing citations, exemption, or exclusion legends. Failure of the USPPI or the authorized agent of either the USPPI or FPPI to comply with these requirements constitutes a violation of the regulations in this part and renders such principal party or the authorized agent subject to the penalties provided for in subpart H of this part. ( a ) *Mail exports.* The proof of filing citation, postdeparture filing citation, AES downtime filing citation, exemption and/or exclusion legend for items exported by mail as required in § 30.4(b) shall be annotated on the appropriate U.S. Postal Service customs declaration form (and/or its electronic equivalent) and presented with the packages at the time of mailing. The Postal Service is required to deliver the proof of filing citation, postdeparture filing citation, AES downtime filing citation, exemption or exclusion legend prior to export.
( b ) *Pipeline exports.* The proof of filing citations or exemption and exclusion legends for items being sent by pipeline shall be presented to the operator of a pipeline no later than four calendar days after the close of the month. See § 30.4(c)(2) for requirements for the filing of export information by pipeline carriers.
( c ) *Exports by other methods of transportation.* For exports sent other than by mail or pipeline, the USPPI or the authorized agent is required to deliver the proof of filing citations and/or exemption and exclusion legends to the exporting carrier in accord with the time periods set forth in § 30.4(b).
[78 FR 16378, Mar. 14, 2013, as amended at 82 FR 18391, Apr. 19, 2017; 82 FR 43843, Sept. 20, 2017]
### §8901. Purposes

The purposes of this chapter are—

(1) to preserve the integrity of the comprehensive design of the L'Enfant and McMillan plans for the Nation's Capital;

(2) to ensure the continued public use and enjoyment of open space in the District of Columbia and its environs, and to encourage the location of commemorative works within the urban fabric of the District of Columbia;

(3) to preserve, protect and maintain the limited amount of open space available to residents of, and visitors to, the Nation's Capital; and

(4) to ensure that future commemorative works in areas administered by the National Park Service and the Administrator of General Services in the District of Columbia and its environs—

(A) are appropriately designed, constructed, and located; and

(B) reflect a consensus of the lasting national significance of the subjects involved.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1227; Pub. L. 108–126, title II, §203(a), Nov. 17, 2003, 117 Stat. 1349.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8901 | 40:1001. | Pub. L. 99–652, §1, Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3650. |

Section

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2003—Par. (2). Pub. L. 108–126 substituted "Columbia and its environs, and to encourage the location of commemorative works within the urban fabric of the District of Columbia;" for "Columbia;".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2003 Amendment

Pub. L. 108–126, title II, §205, Nov. 17, 2003, 117 Stat. 1353, provided that: "Except for the provision in the amendment made by section 202(b) [amending section 8908 of this title] prohibiting a visitor center from being located in the Reserve (as defined in section 8902 of title 40, United States Code), nothing in this title [see Short Title of 2003 Amendment note set out under section 101 of this title] shall apply to a commemorative work for which a site was approved in accordance with chapter 89 of title 40, United States Code, prior to the date of enactment of this title [Nov. 17, 2003]."

#### Findings

Pub. L. 108–126, title II, §202(a), Nov. 17, 2003, 117 Stat. 1349, provided that: "Congress finds that—

"(1) the great cross-axis of the Mall in the District of Columbia, which generally extends from the United States Capitol to the Lincoln Memorial, and from the White House to the Jefferson Memorial, is a substantially completed work of civic art; and

"(2) to preserve the integrity of the Mall, a reserve area should be designated within the core of the great cross-axis of the Mall where the siting of new commemorative works is prohibited."
### §8725. Recommendations on platting and subdividing land

(a) By Council of the District of Columbia.—The Council of the District of Columbia shall submit any proposed change in, or addition to, the regulations or general orders regulating the platting and subdividing of lands and grounds in the District of Columbia to the National Capital Planning Commission for report and recommendation before the Council adopts the change or addition. The Council shall advise the Commission when it does not agree with the recommendations of the Commission and shall give the reasons why it disagrees. The Commission then shall submit a final report within 30 days. After considering the final report, the Council may act in accordance with its legal responsibilities and authority.

(b) By Planning Commission.—The Commission shall submit to the Council any proposed change in, or amendment to, the general orders that the Commission considers appropriate. The Council shall treat the amendments proposed in the same manner as other proposed amendments.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1224.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8725 | 40:71g(d). | June 6, 1924, ch. 270, §8(d), as added July 19, 1952, ch. 949, §1, 66 Stat. 790. |

Section

In subsection (b), the words "to the Council" are added for clarity.
Editorial Note on Part 922
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

§ 922.121 Definitions. In addition to those definitions found at § 922.11, the following definitions apply to this subpart: As used in this subpart: *Disturb or disturbing a ray or whale shark* means to, or attempt to touch, handle, ride, pursue, chase away, hunt, restrain, detain (no matter how temporarily), capture, collect, or conduct any other activity that disrupts or has the potential to disrupt any ray or whale shark in the Sanctuary by any means. Notwithstanding the above, the mere presence of human beings (e.g., swimmers, divers, boaters, kayakers) is exempted from this definition.
*Harmful matter* means any substance, or combination of substances, that because of its quantity, concentration, or physical, chemical, or infectious characteristics may pose a present or potential threat to Sanctuary resources or qualities, including but not limited to: Fishing nets, fishing line, hooks, fuel, oil, and those contaminants (regardless of quantity) listed at 40 CFR 302.4 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 9601(14) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended.
*No-activity zone* (applicable only to oil and gas industry activities) means the geographic areas delineated by the Department of the Interior in Topographic Features Stipulations for Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) lease sales as defined by a bathymetric contour (isobath) ranging from 55-85m in depth, with the exception of Stetson Bank (52m) and East and West Flower Garden Banks (100m). The Notice to Lessees (NTL) No. 2009-G39 provides and consolidates guidance for the avoidance and protection of biologically sensitive features and areas (*i.e.* topographic features, pinnacles, live bottoms (low relief features)) and other potentially sensitive biological features (PSBFs) when conducting operations in water depths shallower than 980 feet (300 meters) in the Gulf of Mexico. NTL 2009-G39 remains in effect pursuant to NTL No. 2015-N02. The no-activity zones are based on depth contours as noted for the following Banks: Stetson Bank (52 meters), MacNeil Bank (82 meters), Rankin Banks (including 28 Fathom Bank) (85 meters), Bright Bank (85 meters), Geyer Bank (85 meters), Elvers Bank (85 meters), McGrail Bank (85 meters), Bouma Bank (85 meters), Rezak Bank (85 meters), Sidner Bank (85 meters), Sonnier Bank (55 meters), Alderdice Bank (80 meters), and Parker Bank (85 meters). For East and West Flower Garden Banks, the no-activity zones are based on the “ 1 ⁄ 4 1 ⁄ 4 1 ⁄ 4” aliquot system formerly used by the Department of the Interior, a method that delineates a specific portion of a block rather than the actual underlying isobath. The precise aliquot part description of these areas around East and West Flower Garden Banks are provided in appendix A of this subpart.
[77 FR 25068, Apr. 27, 2012, as amended at 86 FR 4953, Jan. 19, 2021; 88 FR 967, Jan. 6, 2023]
§ 270.102 Conditions for establishment and deployment of a Team. ( a ) The Director may establish a Team for deployment after an event that caused the failure of a building or buildings that resulted in substantial loss of life or posed significant potential for substantial loss of life. The Director will determine the following prior to deploying a Team: ( 1 ) The event was any of the following: ( i ) A major failure of one or more buildings or types of buildings due to an extreme natural event (earthquake, hurricane, tornado, flood, etc.);
( ii ) A fire that resulted in a building failure of the building of origin and/or spread beyond the building of origin.
( iii ) A major building failure at significantly less than its design basis, during construction, or while in active use; or
( iv ) An act of terrorism or other event resulting in a Presidential declaration of disaster and activation of the National Response Plan; and
( 2 ) A fact-finding investigation of the building performance and emergency response and evacuation procedures will likely result in significant and new knowledge or building code revision recommendations needed to reduce or mitigate public risk and economic losses from future building failures.
( b ) In making the determinations pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, the Director will consider the following: ( 1 ) Whether sufficient financial and personnel resources are available to conduct an investigation; and
( 2 ) Whether an investigation of the building failure warrants the advanced capabilities and experiences of a Team; and
( 3 ) If the technical cause of the failure is readily apparent, whether an investigation is likely to result in relevant knowledge other than reaffirmation of the technical cause; and
( 4 ) Whether deployment of a Team will substantially duplicate local or state resources equal in investigatory and analytical capability and quality to a Team; and
( 5 ) Recommendations resulting from a preliminary reconnaissance of the site of the building failure.
( c ) To the maximum extent practicable, the Director will establish and deploy a Team within 48 hours after such an event.
[68 FR 66704, Nov. 28, 2003, as amended at 69 FR 33571, June 16, 2004]
§ 310.2 Definitions. For the purpose of this part, except where the context requires otherwise: ( a ) *Act* means Pub. L. 91-269.
( b ) *Secretary* means the Secretary of Commerce.
( c ) *Commissioner General* means the person appointed to act as the senior Federal official for the exposition as required by BIE rules and regulations.
( d ) *Director* means the Director of the International Expositions Staff, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Export Development, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
( e ) *Applicant* means a State, County, municipality, a political subdivision of the foregoing, private non-profit or not-for-profit organizations, or individuals filing an application with the Director seeking Federal recognition of an international exposition to be held in the United States.
( f ) *State* means one of the several States of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands.
( g ) *Exposition* means an international exposition proposed to be held in the United States for which an application has been filed with the Director seeking Federal recognition under the Act; which proposes to invite more than one foreign country to participate; and, which would exceed three weeks in duration. Any event under three weeks in duration is not considered an international exposition under BIE rules.
[40 FR 34107, Aug. 14, 1975. Redesignated and amended at 46 FR 57457, Nov. 24, 1981]
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 20 (Wednesday, January 30, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 476]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00231]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Hypertension and Microcirculation.
    Date: February 6, 2019.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Le Meridien Delfina Santa Monica, 530 Pico Blvd., Santa 
Monica, CA 90405.
    Contact Person: Katherine M. Malinda, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4140, MSC 7814, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-435-0912, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2c674d5844495e45424973614d404542484d6c4f5f5e02424544024b435a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ade6ccd9c5c8dfc4c3c8f2e0ccc1c4c3c9ccedcededf83c3c4c583cac2db">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in 
advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of 
December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 23, 2019.
Natasha M. Copeland,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-00231 Filed 1-29-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 791.109 Final determination. ( a ) For each transaction for which the Secretary issues an initial determination that an ICTS Transaction is prohibited, the Secretary shall issue a final determination as to whether the ICTS Transaction is: ( 1 ) Prohibited;
( 2 ) Not prohibited; or
( 3 ) Permitted, at the Secretary's discretion, pursuant to the adoption of negotiated mitigation measures.
( b ) Unless the Secretary determines in writing that additional time is necessary, the Secretary shall issue the final determination within 180 days of accepting a referral and commencing the initial review of the ICTS Transaction pursuant to § 791.103.
( c ) If the Secretary determines that an ICTS Transaction is prohibited, the Secretary shall have the discretion to direct the least restrictive means necessary to tailor the prohibition to address the undue or unacceptable risk posed by the ICTS Transaction.
( d ) The final determination shall: ( 1 ) Be written, signed, and dated;
( 2 ) Describe the Secretary's determination;
( 3 ) Be unclassified and contain no reference to classified national security information;
( 4 ) Consider and address any information received from a party to the ICTS Transaction;
( 5 ) Direct, if applicable, the timing and manner of the cessation of the ICTS Transaction;
( 6 ) Explain, if applicable, that a final determination that the ICTS Transaction is not prohibited does not preclude the future review of transactions related in any way to the ICTS Transaction;
( 7 ) Include, if applicable, a description of the mitigation measures agreed upon by the party or parties to the ICTS Transaction and the Secretary; and
( 8 ) State the penalties a party will face if it fails to comply fully with any mitigation agreement or direction, including violations of IEEPA, or other violations of law.
( e ) The written, signed, and dated final determination shall be sent to: ( 1 ) The parties to the ICTS Transaction via registered U.S. mail and electronic mail; and
( 2 ) The appropriate agency heads.
( f ) The results of final written determinations to prohibit an ICTS Transaction shall be published in the Federal Register. The publication shall omit any confidential business information.
[86 FR 4923, Jan. 19, 2021. Redesignated and amended at 89 FR 58265, July 18, 2024]