alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2016358EN.01000102.xml

| 29.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 358/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 358/1

---

Notice concerning the provisional application between the European Union and the Republic of Ecuador of the Protocol of Accession to the Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Colombia and Peru, of the other part, to take account of the accession of Ecuador

The European Union and the Republic of Ecuador have notified the completion of the procedures necessary for the provisional application of the Protocol of Accession to the Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Colombia and Peru, of the other part, to take account of the accession of Ecuador (1), signed in Brussels on 11 November 2016. Consequently, the Protocol shall be provisionally applied, pursuant to Article 27(4) thereof, as from 1 January 2017 between the European Union and the Republic of Ecuador. As a result, and by virtue of Article 3 of the Council Decision (EU) 2016/2369 (2) on the signing and provisional application of the Protocol, the provisions of the Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Colombia and Peru, of the other part (3) shall be applied on a provisional basis by the European Union as provided for in Article 330(3) thereof, pending the completion of the procedures necessary for the conclusion of the said Protocol, with the exception of Article 2, Article 202(1) and Articles 291 and 292 of the Agreement.

1

2

3

---

(1)  
  OJ L 356, 24.12.2016, p. 3.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 356, 24.12.2016, p. 1.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 354, 21.12.2012, p. 3.

3

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 11, 2014

p0604

Order 

Clerk

June 11, 2014

148444

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148444

COA: 312308

Oakland CC: 2012-240981-FH

RICHARD LEE HARTWICK,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 19, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall 

include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether a defendant’s entitlement to 

immunity under § 4 of the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act (MMMA), MCL 333.26421 

et seq., is a question of law for the trial court to decide; (2) whether factual disputes 

regarding § 4 immunity are to be resolved by the trial court; (3) if so, whether the trial 

court’s finding of fact becomes an established fact that cannot be appealed; (4) whether a 

defendant’s possession of a valid registry identification card establishes any presumption 

for purposes of § 4 or § 8; (5) if not, what is a defendant’s evidentiary burden to establish 

immunity under § 4 or an affirmative defense under § 8; (6) what role, if any, do the 

verification and confidentiality provisions in § 6 of the act play in establishing 

entitlement to immunity under § 4 or an affirmative defense under § 8; and (7) whether 

the Court of Appeals erred in characterizing a qualifying patient’s physician as issuing a 

prescription for, or prescribing, marijuana. 

We direct the Clerk to schedule the oral argument in this case for the same future 

session of this Court when it will hear oral argument in People v Tuttle (Docket No. 

148971).

Persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this 

case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
Editorial Note on Subpart C of Part 9701
Editorial Note: At 73 FR 58435, Oct. 7, 2008, the application of subpart C to part 9701 was rescinded.

§ 9701.353 Setting pay upon promotion. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in this section, upon an employee's promotion, DHS must provide an increase in the employee's rate of basic pay equal to at least 8 percent. The rate of basic pay after promotion may not be less than the minimum rate of the higher band.
( b ) DHS will issue implementing directives providing for an increase other than the amount specified in paragraph (a) of this section in the case of— ( 1 ) An employee promoted from an Entry/Developmental band to a Full Performance band (consistent with the pay progression plan established for the Entry/Developmental band);
( 2 ) An employee who was demoted and is then repromoted back to the higher band; or
( 3 ) Employees in other circumstances specified by DHS implementing directives.
( c ) An employee receiving a retained rate (*i.e.,* a rate above the maximum of the band) before promotion is entitled to a rate of basic pay after promotion that is at least 8 percent higher than the maximum rate of the employee's current band (except in circumstances specified by DHS implementing directives). The rate of basic pay after promotion may not be less than the minimum rate of the employee's new band rate range or the employee's existing retained rate of basic pay. If the maximum rate of the employee's new band rate range is less than the employee's existing rate of basic pay, the employee will continue to be entitled to the existing rate as a retained rate.
( d ) DHS may determine the circumstances under which and the extent to which any locality or special rate supplements are treated as basic pay in applying the promotion increase rules in this section.
----

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BeestonEnterprises Ltd, a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB forthe quarter ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the "Report"), I, Brian Smith, President/CEO of the Company,certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.Section 1350), that to my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

 

***/s/ Brian Smith                               ***

Brian Smith, President, CEO

Dated: May 4, 2005                           

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1382

CATANDRIA N. SOUBLET,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States Tax Court.

(No. 27242-14)

Submitted: August 27, 2015 Decided: August 31, 2015

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Catandria N. Soublet, Appellant Pro Se. Patricia McDonald 

Bowman, Trial Attorney, Bridget Maria Rowan, UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Catandria N. Soublet appeals from the tax court’s order 

dismissing for lack of jurisdiction her unsigned and unratified 

petition for redetermination of a deficiency with respect to her 

2012 income tax liability. We have reviewed the record and find 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the tax 

court. See Soublet v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, T.C. No. 

27242-14 (U.S.T.C. Apr. 6, 2015). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### §702. Definition

For purposes of this chapter, "Federal land management agency" includes—

(1) the Forest Service of the Department of Agriculture;

(2) the Bureau of Land Management of the Department of the Interior;

(3) the National Park Service of the Department of the Interior;

(4) the Fish and Wildlife Service of the Department of the Interior;

(5) the Bureau of Reclamation of the Department of the Interior; and

(6) the Army Corps of Engineers.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1267.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 702 | 36:169i–1(a)(2). | Aug. 27, 1986, Pub. L. 99–402, §4(a)(2), 100 Stat. 911. |

Section
#### §§ 30.75-30.99 [Reserved]
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


EXHIBIT 32.1


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Qlinks America, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") for the three months ended March 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof.


I, James O. Mulford, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief.

     1.   The Report complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
          the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of the
          operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods shown in
          such report.




                                               /s/  James O. Mulford
                                               ---------------------------------
                                       James O. Mulford, Chief Executive Officer


Dated: May 14, 2007
No. IV-12-009

Contact: Victor Dricks (817) 200-1128

 Lara Uselding (817) 200-1519

 

March 20, 2012 

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF TO MEET WITH OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT 

OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS FORT CALHOUN NUCLEAR PLANT

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with officials from the Omaha 

Public Power District in Blair, Neb., on April 4, to discuss the status of performance 

improvements at the Fort Calhoun nuclear plant. OPPD operates the plant, located 19 miles north 

of Omaha.

The meeting, which is open to public observation, will begin at 6 p.m. at the Blair High 

School Auditorium, 440 N. 10th St., in Blair.

Fort Calhoun is shut down and remains in a safe mode following flooding last spring 

along the Missouri River. 

Omaha Public Power District officials will brief the NRC staff on their improvement 

plan, preparations for the 2012 flood season, equipment modifications at the plant and 

organizational changes. Members of the NRC staff will be available to answer questions from 

the public after the business portion of the meeting.

A video of the meeting will be posted to a special website devoted to NRC’s oversight of 

Fort Calhoun.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV

 1600 E. Lamar Blvd.

 Arlington, TX 76011 - 4125

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov
#### § 255.3 Award of fellowships.

Fellowships shall be awarded by the Director of the National Institute of Standards & Technology, with the approval of the Secretary of Commerce and the Secretary of State, or the duly authorized representative of the Secretary of State. Applications shall be transmitted to the Secretary of State by the government of the American republic of which the applicant is a citizen through the American diplomatic mission accredited to that government.

[13 FR 8374, Dec. 28, 1948, as amended at 55 FR 38315, Sept. 18, 1990]
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Qlinks  America,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I, Michael
Thornley,  Chief Financial Officer of the company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.




                                         /s/ Michael Thornley
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Michael Thornley, CFO

Dated: August 11, 2006
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

RightNow Technologies, Inc.:

 

We consent to incorporation byreference in the registration statement (No. 333-115331) on Form S-8 ofRightNow Technologies, Inc. of our report dated March 21, 2005, with respect tothe consolidated balance sheets of RightNow Technologies, Inc. as of December31, 2004 and 2003 and the related consolidated statements of operations,changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit) and comprehensive income (loss), andcash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,2004, which report appears in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-Kof RightNow Technologies, Inc.

 

 
| /s/ KPMG LLP |   |
|--------------|--------|

 

Billings, Montana

March 28, 2005

 

----
## ZUCKERT SCOUTT b 

## RASENBERGER, L.L.P.

888 Seventeenth Street, NW;Washington, DC 20006-3309 Telephone [202] 298-8660 Fax [202] 342-0683 wwwzsrlawcom

WILLIAM H. CALLAWAY, JR.



### Via regulations.gov and email

Robert Finamore Chief, Foreign Air Carrier Licensing U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200New Jersey Ave., 

### S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 November 15, 2012 whcallaway@zsrlaw.com



### Re: Application ofJin Air Company, Limited for an Exemption (U.S.-Korea Open Skies); Docket DOT-OST-2012-0194

Dear Mr

..Finamore:

We have polled the air carriers on the attached service list regarding the above-referenced Application and received no objections. Accordingly, we respectfully request expedited consideration ofthis Application.

cc: All parties on attached service list. Very truly yours,

# Lo.~.

# ..**AO~ -~~~11-!(__D**  William H. Callaway, Jr. Jonathon H. Foglia Counsel to JinAir Company, LimitedCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certifythat I caused a copy ofthe foregoing letterto be served electronically, this 15th day of November, 2012, upon each ofthe parties below.

John M. Allen Director, Flight Standards Service Federal AviationAdministration, AFS-1 800 Independence Ave., SW, Rm. 821 Washington, DC 20591 john.allen@faa.gov

Robert Wirick American Airlines 1101 Seventeenth St., NW, Suite 600 Washington, DC 20036 robert.wirick@aa.com

Russell E. Pommer Atlas Air 1747 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Suite 875 Washington, D.C 20006 rpommer@atlasair.com

Alexander Van Der Bellen Sametta C. Barnett DeltaAir Lines 1212 New York Ave., NW, Suite 200 Washington, DC 20005 sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com sametta.c.bamett@delta.com

Jonathan B. Hill Counsel for Hawaiian Airlines Dow, Lohnes & Albertson, PLLC 1200 New Hampshire Ave., NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036 jhill@dlalaw.com

G. BaileyLeopard Angeline Garbuzinski Federal Express Corporation 3620 Hacks Cross Road, Building B, 3rdFloor Memphis, TN 38125 anbird@fedex.com gbleopard@fedex.com Lorraine B. Halloway Gerald F. Murphy Counsel for United Airlines Crowell & Moring LLP 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 lhalloway@crowell.com gmurphy@crowell.com

Stephen J. Morrissey UnitedAirlines 1225 New York Avenue, NW, Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20005 steve.morrissev@united.com

Dan Weiss Jonathan T. Linde United Airlines 77 West Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60601 dan.weiss@united.com jonathan.linde@united.com

Anita Mosner Jennifer Nowak Counsel for United Parcel Service Holland & Knight 800 1

## ih Street, NW, Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20006 anita.mosner@hklaw.com jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com

HowardKass Benjamin Slocum US Airways 1401 H Street, NW, Suite 1075 Washington, DC 20006 howard kass@usairways.com benjamin.slocum@usairways.comMalcolm L. Benge Counsel for WorldAirways andNorth American Airlines Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger LLP 888 1

## ih Street, NW, Suite 700 Washington, DC 20006 mlbenge@zsrlaw.com
### §17501. Definitions

In this chapter, the following definitions apply:

(1) Executive agency.—The term "executive agency"—

(A) means an executive agency (as that term is defined in section 105 of title 5) that operates at least 300 motor vehicles; but

(B) does not include the Tennessee Valley Authority.

(2) Motor vehicle.—The term "motor vehicle" means—

(A) a vehicle self-propelled or drawn by mechanical power; but not

(B) a vehicle designed or used for military field training, combat, or tactical purposes, or any other special purpose vehicle exempted from the requirements of this chapter by the Administrator of General Services.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1283.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 17501 | 40:913. | Pub. L. 99–272, title XV, §15313, Apr. 7, 1986, 100 Stat. 338. |

Section

In this section, the text of 40:913(2)–(4) is omitted as unnecessary because the complete names of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, the Administrator of General Services, and the Comptroller General of the United States are used the first time the terms appear in a section.

Before clause (1), the words "this chapter" were in the original "this title", meaning title XV (§§15101 to 15313) of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (Public Law 99–272, 100 Stat. 330). In clause (2)(B), the words "this chapter" are substituted for "this part" as the probable intent of Congress because title XV of the Act does not contain part designations and the intention was probably to refer to title XV, which is restated as this chapter.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 8, 2011

0228 

# Order

March 8, 2011

142095

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142095 COA: 291882 Kent CC: 08-004992-FC MARVIN MICHAEL JONES, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 23, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 13.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the Annual Report of Votorantim Celulose e Papel S.A.
(the "Company") on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, as
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Valdir Roque, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

                (i)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of
                        section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange
                        Act of 1934; and

                (ii)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                        in all material respects, the financial condition and
                        results of operations of the Company.





       /s/ Valdir Roque
------------------------------------
Name:  Valdir Roque
Title: Chief Financial Officer

June 30, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
§ 2641.206 One-year restriction on any former senior or very senior employee's representations on behalf of, or aid or advice to, a foreign entity. ( a ) *Basic prohibition of 18 U.S.C. 207(f) .* For one year after service in a senior or very senior employee position terminates, no former senior employee or former very senior employee shall knowingly represent a foreign government or foreign political party before an officer or employee of an agency or department of the United States, or aid or advise such a foreign entity, with the intent to influence a decision of such officer or employee. For purposes of describing persons who may not be contacted with the intent to influence, under 18 U.S.C. 207(f) and this section, the phrase “officer or employee” includes the President, the Vice President, and Members of Congress, and the term “department” includes the legislative branch of government.
( b ) *Exceptions and waivers.* The prohibition of 18 U.S.C. 207(f) does not apply to a former senior or former very senior employee who is: ( 1 ) Acting on behalf of the United States. *See* § 2641.301(a). (Note, however, the limitation in § 2641.301(a)(2)(ii).)
( 2 ) Acting as an elected State or local government official. *See* § 2641.301(b).
( 3 ) Testifying under oath. *See* § 2641.301(f).
( 4 ) Acting on behalf of an international organization pursuant to a waiver. *See* § 2641.301(h).
( 5 ) Acting as an employee of a Government-owned, contractor-operated entity pursuant to a waiver. *See* § 2641.301(i).
( 6 ) Subject to a waiver issued for certain positions. *See* § 2641.301(j).
( c ) *Commencement and length of restriction* — ( 1 ) *Generally.* Except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section, 18 U.S.C. 207(f) is a one-year restriction. The one-year period is measured from the date when an employee ceases to be a senior or very senior employee, not from the termination of Government service, unless the two occur simultaneously. *See* examples 1 and 2 to paragraph (d) of § 2641.204.
( 2 ) *U.S. Trade Representative or Deputy U.S. Trade Representative.* 18 U.S.C. 207(f) is a permanent restriction as applied to a former U.S. Trade Representative or Deputy U.S. Trade Representative.
( d ) *Represent, aid, or advise.* [Reserved]
( e ) *With the intent to influence.* [Reserved]
( f ) *Decision of employee of an agency.* [Reserved]
( g ) *Foreign entity.* [Reserved]