alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 224 (Monday, November 22, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 68001]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25875]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster <greek-i>3624, Amendment <greek-i>3]


State of Alabama

    In accordance with a notice received from the Department of 
Homeland Security--Federal Emergency Management Agency--effective 
November 5, 2004, the above numbered declaration is hereby amended to 
extend the deadline for filing applications for physical damages as a 
result of this disaster to January 3, 2005.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for economic injury is June 15, 2005.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: November 10, 3004.
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-25875 Filed 11-19-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2564

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the harbor 

maintenance tax is applied to certain ports that import cargo exceeding 

$100,000,000 in value per year. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 23, 2003

Mr. CAPUANO (for himself, Mr. DELAHUNT, Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts, Mr. 

OLVER, Mr. LYNCH, and Mr. MARKEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

that the harbor maintenance tax is applied to certain 

ports that import cargo exceeding $100,000,000 in value 

per year.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. APPLICATION OF HARBOR MAINTENANCE TAX 

4 TO CERTAIN PORTS IMPORTING CARGO EX5 CEEDING $100,000,000 IN VALUE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4462(a)(2) of the Internal 

7 Revenue Code of 1986 (defining port) is amended by add8 ing at the end the following new subparagraph: 
2

•HR 2564 IH 

1 ‘‘(D) SPECIAL RULE FOR FACILITIES USED

2 TO TRANSPORT IMPORTED CARGO WORTH MORE

3 THAN $100,000,000 IN A CALENDAR YEAR.—

4 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—The exception 

5 under subparagraph (B) shall not apply 

6 for a calendar year if for any preceding 

7 calendar year after 2001 the channel or 

8 harbor was used to transport commercial 

9 cargo entering the United States with an 

10 aggregate value exceeding $100,000,000. 

11 ‘‘(ii) REINSTATEMENT OF EXCEP12 TION.—Clause (i) shall cease to apply to 

13 any calendar year which is after a period 

14 of 3 consecutive calendar years in which—

15 ‘‘(I) the aggregate value of such 

16 cargo was $100,000,000 or less dur17 ing each year, and 

18 ‘‘(II) no Federal funds were used 

19 for construction, maintenance, or op20 eration. 

21 ‘‘(iii) DURATION OF REINSTATE22 MENT.—Clause (ii) shall continue to apply 

23 to each calendar year after the first cal24 endar year to which such clause applies 

25 only so long as the aggregate value of such 
3

•HR 2564 IH 

1 cargo was $100,000,000 or less during the 

2 preceding calendar year.’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) shall take effect on January 1, 2004.

Æ
### §6303. Unlawful activities

(a) Displays and Solicitations.—It is unlawful for anyone other than an authorized employee or concessionaire to carry out any of the following activities within the specified buildings and grounds:

(1) Offer or expose any article for sale.

(2) Display any sign, placard, or other form of advertisement.

(3) Solicit alms, subscriptions, or contributions.

(b) Touching of, or Injuries to, Property.—It is unlawful for anyone—

(1) other than an authorized employee, to touch or handle objects of art or scientific or historical objects on exhibition within the specified buildings or grounds; or

(2) to step or climb on, remove, or in any way injure any object of art, exhibit (including an exhibit animal), equipment, seat, wall, fountain, or other erection or architectural feature, or any tree, shrub, plant, or turf, within the specified buildings or grounds.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1185.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6303(a) | 40:193p. | Oct. 24, 1951, ch. 559, §§3, 4, 65 Stat. 634. |
| 6303(b) | 40:193q. | |

Section
### **CHAPTER 89—NATIONAL CAPITAL MEMORIALS AND COMMEMORATIVE WORKS**

Sec.
8901.
Purposes.
8902.
Definitions and nonapplication.
8903.
Congressional authorization of commemorative works.
8904.
National Capital Memorial Commission. 1

8905.
Site and design approval.
8906.
Criteria for issuance of construction permit.
8907.
Temporary site designation.
8908.
Areas I and II.
8909.
Administrative.

1  Section catchline amended by Pub. L. 108–126 without corresponding amendment of analysis.
###### Editorial Note on Part 922

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

#### § 922.100 Scope of regulations.

The provisions of this subpart J apply only to the waters of the United States and the Territory of American Samoa that are located within the boundary of the National Marine Sanctuary of American Samoa (Sanctuary). Neither the provisions of this subpart J nor any permit issued under its authority shall be construed to relieve a person from any other requirements imposed by statute or regulation of the Territory of American Samoa or of the United States. In addition, no statute or regulation of the Territory of American Samoa shall be construed to relieve a person from the restrictions, conditions, and requirements contained in this subpart J.
#### Michael Foley, as Guardian ad Litem of Laura Foley, an Infant, Respondent, v. Mary E. Newman, Appellant.

Judgment and order of the County Court of Westchester county unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present—Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ.
#### § 906.2 Definitions.

As used in this part:

*Agency record* means all material and information, including electronic, the office that issued the initial administrative determination relied on or considered in reaching its initial administrative determination, or which otherwise is related to the initial administrative determination.

*Appeal* means an appellant's petition to appeal an initial administrative determination and all administrative processes of the National Appeals Office related thereto.

*Appellant* means a person who is the named recipient of an initial administrative determination and appeals it to the National Appeals Office.

*Appellate officer* means an individual designated by the Chief of the National Appeals Office to adjudicate the appeal. The term may include the Chief of the National Appeals Office.

*Day* means calendar day unless otherwise specified by the Chief of the National Appeals Office. When computing any time period specified under these rules, count every day, including intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays. If the date that ordinarily would be the last day for filing with NAO falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, or a day NAO is closed, the filing period will include the first NAO workday after that date.

*Department* or *DOC* means the Department of Commerce.

*Initial Administrative Determination* or *IAD* means a determination made by an official of the National Marine Fisheries Service that directly and adversely affects a person's ability to hold, acquire, use, or be issued a limited access privilege. The term also includes determinations issued pursuant to other federal law, for which review has been assigned to the National Appeals Office by the Secretary.

*NAO* means the National Appeals Office, an adjudicatory body within the Office of Management and Budget, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Department of Commerce. The term generally means all NAO personnel, including appellate officers.

*NAO case record* means the agency record and all additional documents and other materials related to an appeal and maintained by NAO in a case file.

*NMFS* means the National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Department of Commerce.

*National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration* or *NOAA* means the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Department of Commerce.

*Party* means a person who files a petition for appeal with NAO and an office that issued the IAD if that office participates in the NAO appeal.

*Regional Administrator* means the administrator of one of five regions of NMFS: Northeast, Southeast, West Coast, Alaska, or Pacific Islands. The term also includes an official with similar authority within the DOC, such as the Director of NMFS Office of Sustainable Fisheries.

*Representative* means an individual properly authorized by an appellant in writing to act for the appellant in conjunction with an appeal pending in NAO. The representative does not need to be a licensed attorney.
§ 923.122 Objectives. ( a ) The objective of assistance provided under this part is to encourage each State with a federally-approved coastal management program to continually improve its program in specified areas of national importance. The Secretary is authorized to make grants to a coastal State for the development and submission for Federal approval of program changes that support attainment of one or more coastal zone enhancement objectives.
( b ) As required by section 309(a) of the Act, for purposes of this part, the term *coastal zone enhancement objective* means any of the following objectives: ( 1 ) Protection, restoration, or enhancement of the existing coastal wetlands base, or creation of new coastal wetlands.
( 2 ) Preventing or significantly reducing threats to life and destruction of property by eliminating development and redevelopment in high-hazard areas, managing development in other hazard areas, and anticipating and managing the effects of potential sea level rise and Great Lakes level rise.
( 3 ) Attaining increased opportunities for public access, taking into account current and future public access needs, to coastal areas of recreational, historical, aesthetic, ecological, or cultural value.
( 4 ) Reducing marine debris entering the Nation's coastal and ocean environment by managing uses and activities that contribute to the entry of such debris.
( 5 ) Development and adoption of procedures to assess, consider, and control cumulative and secondary impacts of coastal growth and development, including the collective effect on various individual uses or activities on coastal resources, such as coastal wetlands and fishery resources.
( 6 ) Preparing and implementing special area management plans for important coastal areas.
( 7 ) Planning for the use of ocean resources.
( 8 ) Adoption of procedures and enforceable policies to help facilitate the siting of energy facilities and Government facilities and energy-related activities and Government activities which may be of greater than local significance.
( 9 ) Adoption of procedures and policies to evaluate and facilitate the siting of public and private aquaculture facilities in the coastal zone, which will enable States to formulate, administer, and implement strategic plans for marine aquaculture.
[57 FR 31116, July 14, 1992. Redesignated at 61 FR 33818, June 28, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 12541, Mar. 17, 1997]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Jefferson Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the
period covered by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  |                                                 
|---------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|November 9, 2009 |  | /s/ Anderson L. Smith                           
|                 |  | Anderson L. Smith                               
|                 |  | President and Chief Executive Officer           
|                 | 
|November 9, 2009 |  | /s/ Jane P. Hutton                              
|                 |  | Jane P. Hutton                                  
|                 |  | Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION - ELIMINATION

MD 10.46 CREDIT HOURS DT-13-01

Volume 10,

Part 2:

Personnel Management

Position Evaluation and Management, Pay Administration, and Leave

Approved By: R. W. Borchardt

Executive Director for Operations

Date Approved: January 4, 2013

Expiration Date: January 4, 2018 

Issuing Office: Office of Human Resources

Human Resources Policy and Programs Team

Contact Name: Lawrence Davidson 

301-287-0706

Servicing Human Resources Specialist 

(names and phone numbers are listed here) 

Subject: Elimination of MD 10.46 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Guidance found in Management Directive (MD) 10.46, "Credit Hours," has been updated and 

consolidated and may now be found in MD 10.42, "Work Schedules and Premium Pay." 

Therefore, MD 10.46 is eliminated.

Directive and Handbook 10.42 have been revised to— 

• Consolidate and update policy and program guidance; 

• Remove detailed information about the laws and regulations, except where it is needed 

(for example, to provide context for policy and program guidance); and 

• Remove procedural guidance.
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Beeston Enterprises Ltd, a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Michael Upham, President/Treasurer/CEO/CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.      /s/ Michael Upham Michael Upham, President, Treasurer, CEO, CFO Dated:  November 22, 2010
### Division E—National Civilian Community Corps

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Subtitle E of title I of Pub. L. 101–610, comprising this division, was formerly classified to part H (§12653 et seq.) of this subchapter prior to amendment by Pub. L. 103–82, §104(b).

Pub. L. 111–13, title I, §1517, Apr. 21, 2009, 123 Stat. 1529, inserted division heading and struck out former heading.

#### Prior Provisions

This division is comprised of subtitle E, §§151–165, of title I of Pub. L. 101–610. A prior part E (§12591 et seq.), comprised of subtitle E, §§155–167, of title I of Pub. L. 101–610, related to innovative and demonstration programs and projects, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–82, §104(a).
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 223 (Friday, November 19, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 67749]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25737]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Customs and Border Protection


Annual User Fee for Customs Broker Permit and National Permit: 
General Notice

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of due date for Customs broker user fee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is to advise Customs brokers that the annual fee of $125 
that is assessed for each permit held by a broker whether it may be an 
individual, partnership, association or corporation, is due by January 
21, 2005. This announcement is being published to comply with the Tax 
Reform Act of 1986.

DATES: Due date for payment of fee: January 21, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bruce Raine, Broker Management Branch, 
(202) 344-2580.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 13031 of the Consolidated Omnibus 
Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (Pub. L. 99-272) established that an 
annual user fee of $125 is to be assessed for each Customs broker 
permit and National permit held by an individual, partnership, 
association or corporation. This fee is set forth in the Customs 
Regulations in section 111.96 (19 CFR 111.96).
    Customs Regulations provide that this fee is payable for each 
calendar year in each broker district where the broker was issued a 
permit to do business by the due date which will be published in the 
Federal Register annually. Broker districts are defined in the General 
Notice published in the Federal Register, Volume 60, No. 187, September 
27, 1995.
    Section 1893 of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 (Pub. L. 99-514) 
provides that notices of the date on which the payment is due for each 
broker permit shall be published by the Secretary of the Treasury in 
the Federal Register by no later than 60 days before such due date.
    This document notifies brokers that for 2005, the due date of the 
user fee is January 21, 2005. It is expected that the annual user fees 
for brokers for subsequent years will be due on or about the twentieth 
of January of each year.

    Dated: November 9, 2004.
Jayson P. Ahern,
Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field Operations.
[FR Doc. 04-25737 Filed 11-18-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
### SUBCHAPTER II–A—HEAD START TRANSITION PROJECT
### §6716. Reports

(a) Reports to President and Congress.—The Administrator of General Services shall transmit comprehensive and detailed reports of the Administrator's operations, activities, and accomplishments under this subchapter to the President and Congress. The Administrator shall transmit a report to the President each January and to the President and Congress at other times that the Administrator considers desirable.

(b) Protection and Enhancement of Significant Historic and Architectural Values.—A report under subsection (a) shall include a detailed discussion of the actions the Administrator has taken in the reporting period to protect and enhance the significant historic and architectural values of structures within the boundaries of the Administrator's jurisdiction under this subchapter and shall indicate similar actions the Administrator plans to take and issues the Administrator anticipates dealing with during the upcoming fiscal year related to historic and architectural preservation. The report shall indicate the degree to which public concern has been considered and incorporated into decisions the Administrator made relative to historic and architectural preservation.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1198.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6716(a) | 40:880(a). | Pub. L. 92–578, §11(a), Oct. 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1274; Pub. L. 98–141, §8(d), Oct. 31, 1983, 97 Stat. 910. |
| | 40:880(b). | Pub. L. 92–578, §11(b), (c), as added Pub. L. 98–141, §8(d), Oct. 31, 1983, 97 Stat. 910. |
| 6716(b) | 40:880(c). | |

Section

In subsection (a), the text of 40:880(b) is omitted as obsolete. The requirement that a report be transmitted to Congress each January is eliminated pursuant to section 3003 of the Federal Reports Elimination and Sunset Act of 1995 (31 U.S.C. 1113 note). See, also, page 205 of House Document No. 103–7.
### SUBCHAPTER XVII—PROTECTING AMERICA'S COMPETITIVE EDGE THROUGH ENERGY

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This subchapter was enacted as part of the America COMPETES Act, also known as the America Creating Opportunities to Meaningfully Promote Excellence in Technology, Education, and Science Act, and also as part of the Protecting America's Competitive Edge Through Energy Act, also known as the PACE–Energy Act, and not as part of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, which enacted subchapters I to XVI of this chapter.
#### § 768.9 Appeals of negative foreign availability determinations.

Appeals of negative determinations will be conducted according to the standards and procedures described in part 756 of the EAR. A Presidential decision (NSO) to deny a license or continue controls notwithstanding a determination of foreign availability is not subject to appeal.
### [§3402. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–70, title I, §1331(e)(3)(A), Sept. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 482]

Section, Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 757, related to mailing privileges of members of Armed Forces of the United States and of friendly foreign nations in the Canal Zone.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1979, see section 3304 of Pub. L. 96–70, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3601 of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse.
The Hon. Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., United States District Judge for the Western 1

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

______________

No. 98-1584WM

______________

Cheryl Ann Hall, *

*

Appellant, *

* On Appeal from the United

v. * States District Court for

* the Western District of 

* Missouri.

Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of *

Social Security, * [Not to be published.]

*

Appellee. * 

___________

Submitted: September 24, 1998

Filed: October 2, 1998

___________

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM. 

This is a social-security case in which the claimant asserts disability, principally

upon the basis of depression. The Commissioner found that the depression was not a

significant problem, and the claimant had the residual functional capacity to perform

a limited range of sedentary work. The District Court held that this finding was 1
-2-

supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole, and granted the defendant

Commissioner's motion for summary judgment. 

We affirm. Having reviewed the briefs and record and heard oral argument, we

agree with the District Court. We do not believe that the case has sufficient

precedential significance to justify the writing of a full opinion. 

Affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S.COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.