alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 930.73 OCS plan. ( a ) The term “OCS plan” means any plan for the exploration or development of, or production from, any area which has been leased under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1331 *et seq.*), and the regulations under that Act, which is submitted to the Secretary of the Interior or designee following management program approval and which describes in detail federal license or permit activities.
( b ) The requirements of this subpart do not apply to federal license or permit applications filed after management program approval for activities described in detail in OCS plans approved by the Secretary of the Interior or designee prior to management program approval.
### Part D—Manufacturing USA Program
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 20, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), DVB Project (“DVB”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: DVB Project, Geneva, SWITZERLAND. The nature and scope of  DVB's standards development activities are: To develop, assist in conformance testing in respect of, provide certification services related to, and promote specifications for digital video broadcasting and related fields.

                    For further information about the DVB Project, its activities, and its membership,                     *see http://www.dvb.org.*

Dorothy B. Fountain, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-25871  Filed 11-19-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
§ 330.606 Minimum criteria for agency definition of “well-qualified”. ( a ) At a minimum, the agency must define “well-qualified” as having knowledge, skills, abilities, and/or competencies clearly exceeding the minimum qualification requirements for the vacancy. The agency definition may or may not equate to the highly or best qualified assessment criteria established for the vacancy; however, the agency definition of “well-qualified” must satisfy the criteria in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) Under an agency's definition of “well-qualified,” the agency must be able to determine whether a CTAP eligible: ( 1 ) Meets the basic eligibility requirements (including employment suitability requirements under part 731 of this chapter and any medical qualifications requirements), qualification standards (including minimum educational and experience requirements), and any applicable selective factors;
( 2 ) Is physically qualified, with or without reasonable accommodation, to perform the essential duties of the position;
( 3 ) Meets any special qualifying conditions of the position;
( 4 ) Is able to satisfactorily perform the duties of the position upon entry; and
( 5 ) At agency discretion, either: ( i ) Rates at or above specified level(s) on all quality ranking factors; or
( ii ) Rates above minimally qualified in the agency's rating and ranking process.
§ 550.1201 Purpose, applicability, and administration. ( a ) *Purpose.* This subpart provides regulations to implement sections 5551, 5552, and 6306 of title 5, United States Code, and must be read together with those sections. Sections 5551 and 5552 provide for the payment of a lump-sum payment for accumulated and accrued annual leave when an employee: ( 1 ) Separates from Federal service; or
( 2 ) Enters on active duty in the armed forces and elects to receive a lump-sum payment for accumulated and accrued annual leave. Section 6306 requires that when an employee is reemployed in the Federal service prior to the expiration of the lump-sum period, he or she must refund an amount equal to the pay covering the period between the date of reemployment and the expiration of the period of annual leave (*i.e.,* the lump-sum leave period).
( b ) *Applicability.* This subpart applies to— ( 1 ) Any employee who separates, dies, or transfers under the conditions prescribed in § 550.1203; and
( 2 ) Any employee or individual employed by a territory or possession of the United States who enters on active duty in the armed forces and who elects to receive a lump-sum payment for accumulated and accrued annual leave.
( c ) *Administration.* The head of an agency having employees subject to this subpart is responsible for the proper administration of this subpart.
§ 950.7 Center for Environmental Assessment Services (CEAS). EDIS assists National decisionmakers in solving problems by providing data analyses, applications, assessments, and interpretations to meet their particular requirements. Many of these services are provided by the EDIS Center for Environmental Assessment Services (CEAS). ( a ) The following are examples of CEAS projects and services: ( 1 ) CEAS prepares data-based studies and weekly assessments of potential effects of climatic fluctuations on National and global grain production.
( 2 ) CEAS provides environmental analyses and assessments to support efficient and effective planning, site selection, design, construction, and operation of supertanker ports and offshore drilling rigs. Such planning depends heavily upon environmental assessments.
( 3 ) During the heating season, CEAS issues monthly and seasonal projections of natural gas demand for multi-State regions of the conterminous United States. Similar projections are made for electricity during the cooling season.
( 4 ) CEAS has developed and makes available when needed a statistical oil spill trajectory risk model based on historical meteorological and oceanographic data.
( 5 ) The center has analyzed the potential ecological effects of the planned disposal of huge volumes of saturated brine into Gulf waters for the National Strategic Petroleum Reserve and may be called on to provide similar services in other subject areas.
( 6 ) CEAS provides experiment design, data analysis, and data management support to project managers and produces merged, validated multidisciplinary data sets for international and national study (such undertakings as the recent key role in the Global Atmospheric Research Program (GARP) experiments).
( 7 ) CEAS provides special data or information as required. Currently the Center is assembling an inventory of cruises and a global oceanographic data base from observations taken during the First GARP Global Experiment (FGGE).
( b ) Additional information on these or related services can be obtained by writing: Director, Center for Environmental Assessment Services, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington, DC 20235; or by calling (202) 634-7251.
Editorial Note on Part 922
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

§ 922.201 Definitions. ( a ) The following terms are defined for purposes of this subpart: ( 1 ) *Sanctuary resource* means any historical resource with the Sanctuary boundaries, as defined in § 922.3. This includes, but is not limited to, any sunken watercraft and any associated rigging, gear, fittings, trappings, and equipment; the personal property of the officers, crew, and passengers, and any cargo; and any submerged or partially submerged prehistoric, historic, cultural remains, such as docks, piers, fishing-related remains (e.g., weirs, fish-traps) or other cultural heritage materials. Sanctuary resource also means any archaeological, historical, and cultural remains associated with or representative of historic or prehistoric American Indians and historic groups or peoples and their activities.
( 2 ) *Traditional fishing* means those commercial, recreational, and subsistence fishing activities that were customarily conducted within the Sanctuary prior to its designation or expansion, as identified in the relevant Final Environmental Impact Statement and Management Plan for this Sanctuary.
( b ) All other terms appearing in the regulations in this subpart are defined at § 922.11, and/or in the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. 1401 *et seq.,* and 16 U.S.C. 1431 *et seq.*
[84 FR 32603, July 8, 2019, as amended at 88 FR 19829, Apr. 4, 2023]
No. IV-12-030

Contact: Victor Dricks (817) 200-1128

 Lara Uselding (817) 200-1519

 August 17, 2012 

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD PREDECISIONAL ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE WITH COLASKA

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a predecisional enforcement 

conference with representatives of Colaska, dba Secon Southeast Alaska, on Aug. 21 to discuss 

apparent violations of NRC regulations regarding radiation safety and the security of portable 

nuclear gauges at the company’s facility in Juneau, Alaska.

The conference will begin at 2 p.m. CDT at the NRC’s Region IV office, 1600 East 

Lamar Blvd., Arlington, Texas. During the conference, the company will have an opportunity to 

address the five apparent violations that occurred at their facility. The public is invited to listen 

to the meeting by calling 800-952-9677 and ask to be connected to the meeting. NRC officials 

will be available before the conclusion of the meeting to answer questions.

The company holds an NRC license authorizing it to possess and use radioactive material 

in portable gauges used for road construction. During a May 17 inspection, an NRC inspector 

determined that the licensee failed to properly secure the gauges while in storage. They also 

failed to periodically review the radiation protection program, conduct an inventory of the 

gauges every six months, and conduct annual tests of the sealed sources for leakage or 

contamination. 

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference does not mean that a final

determination has been made, that violations have occurred or that enforcement action will be

taken. The purpose is to discuss the apparent violations, causes and safety significance, to

provide the licensee with an opportunity to point out any errors, if any, in the NRC inspection

report and to enable the company to outline its corrective actions.

No decision on the apparent violations or any contemplated enforcement action, such as a

civil penalty, will be made at the conference. Those decisions will be made by NRC officials at a

later time.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV

 1600 E. Lamar Blvd.

 Arlington, TX 76011-4511

Telephone: (817) 860-8100

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov
### Part A—Unlawful Acts
§ 930.6 State agency responsibility. ( a ) This section describes the responsibilities of the “State agency” described in § 930.11(o). A designated State agency is required to uniformly and comprehensively apply the enforceable policies of the State's management program, efficiently coordinate all State coastal management requirements, and to provide a single point of contact for Federal agencies and the public to discuss consistency issues. Any appointment by the State agency of the State's consistency responsibilities to a designee agency must be described in the State's management program. In the absence of such description, all consistency determinations, consistency certifications and federal assistance proposals shall be sent to and reviewed by the State agency. A State may have two State agencies designated pursuant to § 306(d)(6) of the Act where the State has two geographically separate federally-approved management programs.
( b ) The State agency is responsible for commenting on and concurring with or objecting to Federal agency consistency determinations and negative determinations (*see* subpart C of this part), consistency certifications for federal licenses, permits, and Outer Continental Shelf plans (*see* subparts D, E and I of this part), and reviewing the consistency of federal assistance activities proposed by applicant agencies (*see* subpart F of this part). The State agency shall be responsible for securing necessary review and comment from other State, regional, or local government agencies, and, where applicable, the public. Thereafter, only the State agency is authorized to comment officially on or concur with or object to a federal consistency determination or negative determination, a consistency certification, or determine the consistency of a proposed federal assistance activity.
( c ) If described in a State's management program, the issuance or denial of relevant State permits can constitute the State agency's consistency concurrence or objection if the State agency ensures that the State permitting agencies or the State agency review individual projects to ensure consistency with all applicable State management program policies and that applicable public participation requirements are met. The State agency shall monitor such permits issued by another State agency.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 224 (Monday, November 22, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 67949]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25836]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Petroleum Environmental Research Forum Project 
No. 03-03

    Notice is hereby given that, on November 2, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Petroleum Environmental 
Research Forum Project No. 03-03 (``PERF; Project No. 03-03'') has 
filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General 
and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the 
parties to the venture and (2) the nature and objectives of the 
venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the 
Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties 
to the venture are: ChevronTexaco Energy Technology Company, Richmond, 
CA; ExxonMobil Production Company, Houston, TX; Total E&P Services, 
Courbevoie, FRANCE; Halliburton Energy Services Group, Houston, TX; and 
Statoil ASA, Stavanger, NORWAY. The general area of PERF Project No. 
03-03's planned activity is to generate a set of model technical 
standards that may be incorporated into regulations (framework) based 
on a risk approach to protect health and the environment at E&P 
operations. The activities to be carried out include the development of 
a framework from which risk based technical standards can be derived. 
Participation in this joint venture will remain open to qualified 
persons and organizations, and the participants intend to file 
additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-25836 Filed 11-19-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
§ 841.1007 Agreement modification and termination. This agreement may be modified or terminated in the following manner: ( a ) Either party may suggest a modification of non-regulatory provisions of the agreement in writing to the other party. The other party must accept or reject the modification within 60 calendar days of the date of the suggestion.
( b ) The agreement may be terminated by either party on 60 calendar days written notice.
( c ) OPM may modify this agreement unilaterally through the rule making process described in sections 553, 1103, and 1105 of title 5, United States Code.
NRC Form 831A (04-10-2024)

Part 110 License Number:

NRC FORM 831A

(04-10-2024)

10 CFR 110.50(c)(3)(i)

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY OMB: NO. 3150-0036 EXPIRES: 04/30/2027

SOURCE

1

ACTIVITY (TBq) MAKE MODEL SERIAL NUMBER

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

REPORT OF EXPORT 

 CONTINUATION SHEET

ADVANCED NOTIFICATION OF 

SHIPMENT OF CATEGORY 1 AND/OR 2 

RADIOACTIVE SOURCES 

In accordance with 10 CFR Part 110.50(c)(3)(ii) 

of the U.S. NRC Regulations

PAGE NUMBER: OF

SEND COMPLETED FORM TO:

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 

ATTN: Headquarters Operation Center 

Email: hoo.hoc@nrc.gov (Preferred Reporting Method) 

Fax: (301) 816-5151 (Alternative Reporting Method) Reference Number:

Expiration Date of Part 110 License Number:

Estimated burden per response to comply with this mandatory collection request: 30 minutes. This form 

allows the NRC to request additional information from licensees to determine whether a license should be 

revoked, suspended, or modified. Send comments regarding burden estimate to the FOIA, Library, and 

Information Collections Branch, (T-6 A10M), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 

20555-001, or by email to Infocollects.Resource@nrc.gov, and to the and the OMB reviewer at: OMB Office 

of Information and Regulatory Affairs, (3150-0036), Attn: Desk Officer for the Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission, 725 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20503. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a 

person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the document requesting or requiring 

the collection displays a currently valid OMB control number.
# Úřední věstník C 323I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0863 |
| --- | --- |
| Úřední věstník
  Evropské unie | C 323I |
| | |
| České vydání | Informace a oznámení | Ročník 631. října 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0863

Úřední věstník

Evropské unie

C 323I

České vydání

Informace a oznámení

Ročník 631. října 2020

---

| Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informace |
| | INFORMACE ORGÁNŮ, INSTITUCÍ A JINÝCH SUBJEKTŮ EVROPSKÉ UNIE |
| | Rada |
| 2020/C 323 I/01 | Rozhodnutí Rady ze dne 29. září 2020, kterým se přijímá postoj Rady k návrhu souhrnného rozpočtu Evropské unie na rozpočtový rok 2021 | 1 |

Obsah

Strana

IV   Informace

INFORMACE ORGÁNŮ, INSTITUCÍ A JINÝCH SUBJEKTŮ EVROPSKÉ UNIE

Rada

2020/C 323 I/01

Rozhodnutí Rady ze dne 29. září 2020, kterým se přijímá postoj Rady k návrhu souhrnného rozpočtu Evropské unie na rozpočtový rok 2021

1

---

| CS | |
| --- | --- |

CS

---

IV Informace

INFORMACE ORGÁNŮ, INSTITUCÍ A JINÝCH SUBJEKTŮ EVROPSKÉ UNIE

Rada

| 1.10.2020 | CS | Úřední věstník Evropské unie | CI 323/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2020

CS

Úřední věstník Evropské unie

CI 323/1

---

ROZHODNUTÍ RADY

ze dne 29. září 2020,

kterým se přijímá postoj Rady k návrhu souhrnného rozpočtu Evropské unie na rozpočtový rok 2021

(2020/C 323 I/01)

RADA EVROPSKÉ UNIE,

s ohledem na Smlouvu o fungování Evropské unie, a zejména na čl. 314 odst. 3 této smlouvy, ve spojení se Smlouvou o založení Evropského společenství pro atomovou energii, a zejména s článkem 106a této smlouvy,

vzhledem k těmto důvodům:

| (1) | Dne 27. července 2020 předložila Komise návrh obsahující návrh souhrnného rozpočtu Evropské unie na rozpočtový rok 2021 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Dne 27. července 2020 předložila Komise návrh obsahující návrh souhrnného rozpočtu Evropské unie na rozpočtový rok 2021 (1).

| (2) | Rada projednala návrh Komise s cílem stanovit postoj, který by byl na straně příjmů v souladu s rozhodnutím Rady 2014/335/EU, Euratom ze dne 26. května 2014 o systému vlastních zdrojů Evropské unie (2) a na straně výdajů v souladu s návrhem nařízení Rady (EU, Euratom), kterým se stanoví víceletý finanční rámec na období 2021–2027, ve znění schváleném v široké míře na zasedání Coreperu dne 29. července 2020. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Rada projednala návrh Komise s cílem stanovit postoj, který by byl na straně příjmů v souladu s rozhodnutím Rady 2014/335/EU, Euratom ze dne 26. května 2014 o systému vlastních zdrojů Evropské unie (2) a na straně výdajů v souladu s návrhem nařízení Rady (EU, Euratom), kterým se stanoví víceletý finanční rámec na období 2021–2027, ve znění schváleném v široké míře na zasedání Coreperu dne 29. července 2020.

ROZHODLA TAKTO:

Jediný článek

Postoj Rady k návrhu souhrnného rozpočtu Evropské unie na rozpočtový rok 2021 přijala Rada dne 29. září 2020.

Úplné znění je k dispozici k nahlédnutí nebo ke stažení na internetových stránkách Rady: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/.

V Bruselu dne 29. září 2020.

Za Radu

předseda

M. ROTH

---

(1)  COM(2020) 300 final.

1

(2)  Úř. věst. L 168, 7.6.2014, s. 105.

2

---
EXHIBIT 32.1  Section 1350 Certification  In connection with the Annual Report of Gold Horse International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Liankuan Yang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
  2.
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Liankuan Yang Name: Liankuan Yang Title: Chief Executive Officer. principal executive officer  Dated: October 6, 2008  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.