alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 18.5 Eligibility of applicants. ( a ) To be eligible for an award of attorney fees and other expenses under the Act, the applicant must be a party to the adversary adjudication for which it seeks an award. The term “party” is defined in 5 U.S.C. 551(3). The applicant must show that it meets all conditions of eligibility set out in this part.
( b ) The types of eligible applicants are as follows: ( 1 ) An individual with a net worth of not more than $2 million;
( 2 ) The sole owner of an unincorporated business who has a net worth of not more than $7 million, including both personal and business interests, and not more than 500 employees;
( 3 ) A charitable or other tax-exempt organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3)) with not more than 500 employees;
( 4 ) A cooperative association as defined in section 15(a) of the Agricultural Marketing Act (12 U.S.C. 1141j(a)) with not more than 500 employees; and
( 5 ) Any other partnership, corporation, association, unit of local government, or organization with a net worth of not more than $7 million and not more than 500 employees.
( c ) For the purpose of eligibility, the net worth and number of employees of an applicant shall be determined as of the date the proceeding was initiated.
( d ) An applicant who owns an unincorporated business will be considered as an “individual” rather than a “sole owner of an unincorporated business” if the issues on which the applicant prevails are related primarily to personal interests rather than to business interests.
( e ) The employees of an applicant include all persons who regularly perform services for remuneration for the applicant, under the applicant's direction and control. Part-time employees shall be included on a proportional basis.
( f ) The net worth and number of employees of the applicant and all of its affiliates shall be aggregated to determine eligibility. Any individual, corporation or other entity that directly or indirectly controls or owns a majority of the voting shares or other interest of the applicant, or any corporation or other entity of which the applicant directly or indirectly owns or controls a majority of the voting shares or other interest, will be considered an affiliate for purposes of this part, unless the adjudicative officer determines that such treatment would be unjust and contrary to the purposes of the Act in light of the actual relationship between the affiliated entities. In addition, the adjudicative officer may determine that financial relationships of the applicant other than those described in this paragraph constitute special circumstances that would make an award unjust.
( g ) An applicant that participates in a proceeding primarily on behalf of one or more other persons or entities that would be ineligible is not itself eligible for an award.
[47 FR 13510, Mar. 31, 1982, as amended at 53 FR 6798, Mar. 3, 1988]
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of ATM Financial Corp. on Form 10-QSB
for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Arthur Davis, Chief
Executive Officer, President, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  November 8, 2006    /s/ Arthur Davis
                           Arthur Davis
                           President & Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Review of NIH Clinical Trial Planning Grant Program (R34).                    

*Date:*                         December 8, 2004.                    

*Time:*                         10:30 a.m. to 12 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, 6701 Democracy                               ( print page 67594)                            Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Guo HE Zhang, PHD, MD, Scientific Review Administrator, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 800, Bethesda, MD 20817, 301-451-6524,                         *zhanggu@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 10, 2004.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-25568  Filed 11-17-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
CUSTOMS BONDED WAREHOUSING

----
AMENDED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

OF

TRAVELER'S INFOCENTER INC.

Under Section 242 of the

Delaware General Corporation Law

The undersigned President of Traveler's Infocenter Inc., (the "Corporation"), a corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the state of Delaware, pursuant to Section 242  of the
Delaware General Corporation Law, does hereby certify as follows:

1.   The Name of the Corporation is Traveler's Infocenter Inc.

2.    The Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation was originally filed with the Division of
Corporations on August 24, 1995.

3.  The Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, as heretofore amended, is hereby
amended to effect amendments or changes authorized by the General Law as follows: (i) to
change the name of the corporation to Green Dolphin Systems Corporation, and (ii)  to increase
the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock which the Corporation shall have authority to
issue 100,000,000 shares of Common Stock of the par value of $.001 per share and of the same
class as the presently authorized shares.

4.   Accordingly, the text of the Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended or changed to
read as follows:

FIRST: The name of the corporation is Green Dolphin Systems Corporation.

FOURTH: A. Authorized shares.  The aggregate number of shares which the Corporation shall
have the authority to is 100,000,000 shares of common stock (the common stock), par value
$.001.

5.   The amendment of the certificate of the corporation herein has been duly adopted in
accordance with the provision of Section 242 of the General Corporation Laws of the State of
Delaware.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I, Nicholas Plessas, President of the Corporation, have subscribed
this document and do hereby affirm, under the penalties of perjury, that the statements contained
herein have been examined by me and are true and correct, this 16th day of February, 2000.

/s/ Nicholas Plessas
February 17, 2011 

Mr. John J. Miller, CHP 

International Isotopes, Inc. 

4137 Commerce Circle 

Idaho Falls, ID 83401 

SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO THE INTERNATIONAL ISOTOPES INC. LETTER DATED 

DECEMBER 17, 2010 REGARDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 

STATEMENT SCOPING PROCESS FOR THE PROPOSED INTERNATIONAL 

ISOTOPES FLUORINE EXTRACTION PROCESS AND DEPLETED URANIUM 

DE-CONVERSION PLANT 

Dear Mr. Miller: 

Thank you for your letter, “Clarification Regarding Comments Received During the 

Environmental Impact Statement Scoping Process for the Proposed International Isotopes 

Fluorine Extraction Process and Depleted Uranium De-Conversion Plant,” dated December 17, 

2010. This letter has been placed in the Publicly Available Records System (PARS) of NRC’s 

Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), Accession Number 

ML110120141. ADAMS is accessible from the NRC web site at http://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/adams.html. 

Your letter provides comments regarding the “Environmental Impact Statement Scoping 

Process, Scoping Summary Report, Proposed International Isotopes Fluorine Products, Inc. 

(IIFP) Fluorine Extraction Process and Depleted Uranium De-Conversion Plant to be Located in 

Lea County, New Mexico,” dated November 24, 2010 (ML102871105). Specifically, you noted 

your concerns with the context, characterization and computation of comments. Pursuant to 

10 CFR § 51.29(b), the scoping summary report is intended to provide a concise summary of 

the determinations and conclusions reached, and significant issues identified during the scoping 

process. The staff may, however, revise these determinations prior to issuance of the draft 

environmental impact statement in accordance with 10 CFR § 51.29(c). We have made note of 

your comments and will consider them, as appropriate, in the development of the Draft EIS. 
J. Miller 2 

If you have any additional questions, please contact Matt Bartlett at (301)-492-3119 or via email 

matthew.bartlett@nrc.gov or myself at (301)-415-6458 or via email at asimios.malliakos@nrc.gov.

 Sincerely, 

 /RA/ 

 Asimios Malliakos, Project Manager 

 Environmental Review Branch A 

 Division of Waste Management 

 and Environmental Protection 

 Office of Federal and State Materials 

 and Environmental Management Programs 

 
J. Miller` 2 

If you have any additional questions, please contact Matt Bartlett at (301)-492-3119 or via email 

matthew.bartlett@nrc.gov or myself at (301)-415-6458 or via email at asimios.malliakos@nrc.gov.

 Sincerely, 

 Asimios Malliakos, Project Manager 

 Environmental Review Branch A 

 Division of Waste Management 

 and Environmental Protection 

 Office of Federal and State Materials 

 and Environmental Management Programs 

DISTRIBUTION: AMalliakos, FSME DDiaz-Toro, FSME MBartlett, NMSS 

 THiltz, NMSS JMoore, FSME 

ML110190713

OFFICE FSME/DWMEP FSME/DWMEP NMSS/AFCB OGC FSME/DWMEP 

NAME AMalliakos DDiaz-Toro 

Via e-mail 

THiltz 

Via e-mail 

JBielecki 

Via e-mail 

AMalliakos 

DATE 01/19 /11 01/19/11 01/25/11 02/08/11 02/17/11 

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
# L_2023011EN.01003101.xml

| 12.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 11/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 11/31

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 264/2019

of 25 October 2019

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2023/87]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/502 of 28 February 2018 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/799 laying down the requirements for the construction, testing, installation, operation and repair of tachographs and their components (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/502 of 28 February 2018 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/799 laying down the requirements for the construction, testing, installation, operation and repair of tachographs and their components (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 21bb (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/799) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32018 R 0502: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/502 of 28 February 2018 (OJ L 85, 28.3.2018, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32018 R 0502: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/502 of 28 February 2018 (OJ L 85, 28.3.2018, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/502 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 26 October 2019, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 25 October 2019.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gunnar PÁLSSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 85, 28.3.2018, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1751

AMEDE MOLIMI BULA BULA,

Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United

States,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A79-466-106)

Submitted: July 21, 2004 Decided: August 6, 2004

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ana T. Jacobs, ANA T. JACOBS & ASSOCIATES, Washington, D.C., for

Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, David V.

Bernal, Assistant Director, Anthony P. Nicastro, Office of

Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Amede Molimi Bula Bula, a native and citizen of the

Democratic Republic of the Congo, petitions for review of an order

of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal

of the immigration judge’s denial of his motion to reconsider. We

have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s order and

find that the Board did not abuse its discretion. See INS v.

Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992). Additionally, we conclude

Bula Bula’s claims that the Board’s new streamlining regulations,

pursuant to which his appeal was decided by a single Board member,

were impermissibly retroactive, inconsistent with the Immigration

and Nationality Act, and in violation of his rights under the Due

Process Clause are foreclosed by Blanco de Belbruno v. Ashcroft,

362 F.3d 272 (4th Cir. 2004), in which we concluded to the

contrary.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

UNDER

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

PACIFIC
MERCANTILE BANCORP

Annual Report on Form 10-K

for the Year
ended December 31, 2006

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pacific Mercantile Bancorp (the
Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the Annual Report), , and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Raymond E. Dellerba, certify that:

(1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: March 14, 2007



/s/ RAYMOND E. DELLERBARaymond E. Dellerba President and Chief Executive Officer
### §9504. Reports

As superintendent of the Washington Aqueduct, the Chief of Engineers annually shall submit to the Secretary of the Army, within nine months after the end of the fiscal year, a report of the Chief of Engineers' operations for that year and a report of the condition, progress, repairs, casualties, and expenditures of the Washington Aqueduct and other public works under the charge of the Chief of Engineers.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1234.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 9504 | 40:50. | R.S. §1812; Pub. L. 96–470, title II, §202(a), Oct. 19, 1980, 94 Stat. 2242. |

Section

The provisions of section 1812 of the Revised Statues [sic] which authorized the Chief of Engineers, as Superintendent of Public Buildings and Grounds, to report to the Secretary of War concerning the Chief of Engineers' operations for the preceding year, including an account of the manner in which all appropriations for public buildings and grounds had been applied, are omitted because the Office of Public Buildings and Grounds under the Chief of Engineers was abolished and the functions of the Chief of Engineers and the Secretary of War with respect to the Superintendent of Public Buildings and Grounds were transferred to the Director of Public Buildings and Public Parks of the National Capital by section 3 of the Act of February 26, 1925 (ch. 339, 43 Stat. 983). Those functions subsequently were transferred to the National Park Service by section 2 of Executive Order No. 6166 (eff. June 10, 1933) and the Act of March 2, 1934 (ch. 38, 48 Stat. 389), the Public Buildings Administrator in the Federal Works Agency by sections 301 and 303 of Reorganization Plan No. I of 1939 (eff. July 1, 1939, 53 Stat. 1426, 1427), and the Administrator of General Services by section 103(a) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (ch. 288, 63 Stat. 380), which is restated as section 303(c) [303(b)] of the revised title. The words "Secretary of the Army" are substituted for "Department of War" [subsequently changed to "Department of the Army" because of section 205(a) of the National Security Act of 1947 (ch. 343, 61 Stat. 501)] because of 10:3013(a)(1).
1 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 95-10902

Summary Calendar

LOCKHEED CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORP.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Texas

(4:92-CV-865-Y)

April 4, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

Rockwell International Corporation (“Rockwell”) outbid

Lockheed Corporation (“Lockheed”) to perform a contract between the

United States and Korea. Lockheed sued Rockwell alleging that

Rockwell’s performance under the contract would constitute

infringement of Lockheed’s copyright. Rockwell filed a “Motion to

Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction” in which it argued that exclusive

subject matter jurisdiction lay in the court of claims, not the
2

district court. A great deal of time passed and ultimately the

Korean Government canceled the contract rendering the dispute moot.

Lockheed then filed a notice of dismissal of its lawsuit which the

district court subsequently confirmed by entering an order of

dismissal. Rockwell appeals raising numerous issues. 

The threshold question is whether Lockheed had the right to

unilaterally dismiss its suit under Rule 41. Clearly it did. Rule

41(a)(1)(i) requires the filing of answer or motion for summary

judgment to preclude the plaintiff’s right of dismissal. Exxon v.

Maryland Casualty Co., 599 F.2d 659 (5th Cir. 1979). No such

pleading was filed in this case. Rockwell argues that a footnote

in its brief filed in support of its motion to the effect that the

court might wish to consider the motion as one for summary judgment

and the fact that, Lockheed in its brief agreed that the court

might do so, somehow transforms the Motion to Dismiss for Lack of

Jurisdiction into a motion for summary judgment. We find this

argument unavailing. What Rockwell filed it clearly labeled a

motion to dismiss. The content of its motion made it clear that it

was a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction under Rule

12(b)(1). Lockheed properly exercised its right to unilaterally

dismiss its case and we affirm that dismissal.

AFFIRMED.
### §190110. Service of process

(a) District of Columbia.—The corporation shall have a designated agent in the District of Columbia to receive service of process for the corporation. Notice to or service on the agent is notice to or service on the corporation.

(b) States, Territories, and Possessions.—As a condition to the exercise of any power or privilege granted by this chapter, the corporation shall file, with the secretary of state or other designated official of each State, territory, or possession of the United States in which a subordinate department or local chapter is organized, the name and address of an agent in that State, territory, or possession on whom legal process or demands against the corporation may be served.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1448.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 190110(a) | 36:236 (2d, last sentences). | June 30, 1950, ch. 431, §§16 (2d, last sentences), 17, 64 Stat. 315. |
| 190110(b) | 36:237. | |

Section

In subsection (b), the words "precedent" and "or conferred" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "with the secretary of state or other designated official" are substituted for "in the office of the secretary of state, or similar officer" for consistency in the revised title. The words "post office" are omitted as unnecessary.