alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD CANCELS ORAL ARGUMENTS IN 

DAVIS-BESSE LICENSE RENEWAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR MAY 18

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Atomic Safety and Licensing Board today 

canceled oral arguments scheduled for Friday, May 18, in Port Clinton, Ohio, on the Davis-Besse 

nuclear power plant license renewal hearing, at the request of the intervenors.

Friday’s session was to discuss the admissibility of a new contention filed by the 

intervenors, Beyond Nuclear, Citizens Environment Alliance of Southwestern Ontario, Don’t 

Waste Michigan, and the Green Party of Ohio, arguing that cracks in the Davis-Besse shield 

building should be considered “an aging-related feature” to be monitored throughout any period 

of extended operation. The oral arguments were announced in a Board Order issued March 28 

and press release 12-047, issued May 2.

On April 5, plant operator FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co. (FENOC) submitted 

responses to the NRC staff’s request for additional information and an amendment to its license 

renewal application. These documents addressed issues relating to shield building cracking and 

provided a new aging-management program called “Shield Building Monitoring Program.” 

FENOC then filed a motion opposing the contention on the shield building as moot.

The intervenors responded on May 14, requesting to reschedule the oral argument until 

after they amend their contention to reflect the license renewal application amendment. Under 

hearing proceedings, intervenors would have until June 4 to amend their contention. The Board 

granted this motion today. The Board said it will consider the amended contention and replies by 

FENOC and the NRC staff before deciding whether to reschedule oral argument.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 12-057 May 15, 2012
###### Editorial Note on Part 922

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

#### § 922.91 Definitions.

In addition to those definitions found at § 922.11, the following definitions apply to this subpart:

*Handline* means fishing gear that is set and pulled by hand and consists of one vertical line to which may be attached leader lines with hooks.

*Rod and reel* means a rod and reel unit that is not attached to a vessel, or, if attached, is readily removable, from which a line and attached hook(s) are deployed. The line is payed out from and retrieved on the reel manually or electrically.

*Stowed and not available for immediate use* means not readily accessible for immediate use, e.g., by being securely covered and lashed to a deck or bulkhead, tied down, unbaited, unloaded, partially disassembled, or stowed for transit.

[80 FR 13108, Mar. 12, 2015, as amended at 88 FR 966, Jan. 6, 2023]
Hogan Lovells US LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in the District of Columbia. “Hogan Lovells” is an international legal practice that includes Hogan Lovells US

LLP and Hogan Lovells International LLP, with offices in: Abu Dhabi Alicante Amsterdam Baltimore Beijing Berlin Brussels Caracas Colorado Springs Denver

Dubai Dusseldorf Frankfurt Hamburg Hanoi Ho Chi Minh City Hong Kong Houston London Los Angeles Madrid Miami Milan Moscow Munich New York

Northern Virginia Paris Philadelphia Prague Rome San Francisco Shanghai Silicon Valley Singapore Tokyo Ulaanbaatar Warsaw Washington DC Associated

offices: Budapest Jeddah Riyadh Zagreb. For more information see www.hoganlovells.com

\\DC - 023866/000002 - 4662424 v1

Hogan Lovells US LLP

Columbia Square

555 Thirteenth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20004

T +1 202 637 5600

F +1 202 637 5910

www.hoganlovells.com

May 15, 2013

By Electronic Mail

Ms. Esta Rosenberg

Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division

Office of International Aviation

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Motion of Mesa Airlines, Inc. for Temporary Waiver of Dormancy Conditions (PHX-MZT),

Dockets DOT-OST-2011-0076 and 2003-16529

Dear Ms. Rosenberg:

On behalf of Mesa Airlines, Inc., we have polled the U.S. carrier representatives served with

the above-referenced Motion filed on May 13, 2013, and no carrier has objected to the relief sought

therein.

Sincerely,

Patrick R. Rizzi

Counsel

patrick.rizzi@hoganlovells.com

D +1 202 637 5659

Counsel for Mesa Airlines, Inc.

cc: bob.kneisley@wnco.com; marshall.sinick@squiresanders.com; robert.wirick@aa.com;

francis.heil@aa.com; sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com; sametta.c.barnett@delta.com;

jhill@dowlohnes.com; jyoung@yklaw.com; dkirstein@yklaw.com;

john.fredericksen@suncountry.com; dan.weiss@united.com; howard_kass@usairways.com;

barbara.russell@virginamerica.com; brian.hedberg@dot.gov; esta.rosenberg@dot.gov;

brett.kruger@dot.gov; urskr@state.gov; info@airlineinfo.com
NRC SCHEDULES MEETING TO DISCUSS SAFETY 

PERFORMANCE OF HONEYWELL METROPOLIS FACILITY 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a public meeting in Metropolis, 

Ill., on May 9 to discuss its latest evaluation of safety performance at the Honeywell Specialty 

Chemicals plant. The Honeywell plant processes uranium for use in commercial nuclear power 

plant fuel.

The meeting is scheduled to begin at 7 p.m. CDT at the Massac County Courthouse, 1 

Superman Square, in Metropolis. The public can observe the business portion of the meeting and 

NRC staff will be available after that session to answer questions or provide further information 

about NRC oversight of the facility.

 The NRC’s evaluation of Honeywell, called a Licensee Performance Review, covered a 

period beginning January 7, 2010, and ending December 31, 2010. The review covered 

performance at the plant in the areas of Safety Operations, Safeguards, Radiological Controls, 

Facility Support and Special Topics. 

 The review found that Honeywell continued to operate safely and securely and did not 

identify any areas in need of specific improvement. However, the NRC said that the agency 

plans to perform some additional inspection activities beyond those required by the plant’s core 

inspection program. The NRC will also conduct the next review over a 12-month period. 

 The NRC letter to Honeywell discussing the performance review is available by going to 

the NRC website at www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html and entering the document 

number ML110660054.

 

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No: II-11-028

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416

 April 27, 2011

E-mail: OPA2.Resource@nrc.gov
NRC ISSUES SUMMARY OF AGENCY PERFORMANCE

AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR FY 2012

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued its Summary of Performance and 

Financial Information, Fiscal Year 2012, also called the Citizen’s Report. The congressionally 

mandated report summarizes the agency’s performance in protecting people and the environment 

through the regulation of nuclear power and civilian use of nuclear material. It also provides key 

financial and performance information for Congress and the public to assess how well the agency 

has carried out its mission.

In FY 2012, the NRC provided effective and efficient oversight of 104 commercial 

nuclear power plants across the country, continuing to strengthen the interrelationship among 

safety, security and emergency preparedness. The agency issued the first regulatory requirements 

based on lessons learned from the March 2011 Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear incident in Japan, 

setting stronger standards for coping with extreme natural events. The agency also identified 

additional safety improvements that are expected to be completed in the next four years.

The NRC also remained focused on the safe and secure civilian use of nuclear materials 

through effective oversight of fuel facilities, uranium recovery sites, decommissioning sites, and 

nuclear material user licensees. The agency licensed a new uranium enrichment facility during 

FY 2012. It also launched a major two-year environmental study of spent nuclear fuel storage.

The NRC Summary of Performance and Financial Information, Fiscal Year 2012 Report 

(NUREG-1542, Volume 18, Supplement 1), is available on the NRC website. The full 

Performance and Accountability Report for FY 2012 was published in November 2012.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 13-009 February 20, 2013
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7639

ISSAC D. PATTERSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge.

(CA-97-1064-2)

Submitted: April 15, 1999 Decided: April 21, 1999

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Issac D. Patterson, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Eldridge Jeffrey, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

October 20, 1998, the district court’s records show it was entered

on the docket sheet on October 21, 1998. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.

P. 58 and 79(a), we consider this date as the effective date of the

district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232,

1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Issac D. Patterson seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See Patterson v. Angelone, No. CA-97-1064-2

(E.D. Va. Oct. 21, 1998).* We also deny Patterson’s application to

proceed in formal pauperis in this court. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 995.27 Format validation software testing.

Tests shall be performed verifying, as far as reasonable and practicable, that CEVAD's data testing software performs the checks, as specified by CEVAD, for verifying that the converted data conforms to its own proprietary product specification. These tests may be combined with testing of the conversion software.
Exhibit 32.2

          CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of East Penn Financial Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Theresa M. Wasko,
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      o     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      o     To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
            presents, in all material respects, the Company's consolidated
            financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
            the dates and for the periods presented in the Report.


 /s/ Theresa M. Wasko
-------------------------------------------------------
Theresa M. Wasko, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

Dated: August 10, 2006


                                    Page 34
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l y c onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. A RTU RO TO SCA N O - V I LLA SEN O R, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 10- 50218 D . C . N o. 3: 09 -c r- 03 43 4-L ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia M . J a m e s L or e nz , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry 15, 2011 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , F E RN A N D E Z , an d M . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. A rturo T oscano -V i l l as enor appeal s f rom the 57 -m on th sent ence i m po se d f o llo w in g h is g u ilty - p le ac o n v ic tio n f o ra tte m p te d e n try a f

te rd e p o rta tio n , in vi ol a t i on of

8 U . S . C . § 1326. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291, a nd w e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED FEB 22 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 50218 2 T os c a no- V i l l a s e norc ont e nds tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourte rr e d w he n i tappl i e d a 16- l e ve l e nha nc e m e nt , pur s ua ntt o U . S . S . G . § 2L 1. 2( b) ( 1) ( A ) ( i i ) , be c aus e hi s pr i or c onvi c t i on f

ori nf l i c t i ng c orpor a l i nj ury on as pous e orc o- habi t a nt , i n vi ol a t i on of s e c tio n 2 7 3 .5 o f

th e C a lif

o rn iaP e n a l C o d e , d o e s n o t q u a lif y a s ac r im e o f

v io le n c e . T h i s co n t en t i o n i s fo recl o sed b y U ni te d State s v . L aur i c o- Y e no , 590 F . 3d 818, 823 ( 9th C i r . 2010) . T oscano -V i l l as enor further c on t ends thatthe di stri ctcourtprocedural l y e rr ed by tre at i ng the S ent enci ng G ui del i nes a s pre sum pt i vel y r ea sonabl e. T he re cord r e f le c ts th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt d id n o t s o e rr . Se e U n ite d S ta te s v . C a r ty , 520 F . 3d 98 4, 99 1 (9th C i r. 20 08 ) ( en banc). T os c a no- V i l l a s e nora l s o c ont e nds tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourti m pos e d a s ubs t a nt i ve l y unr e a s onabl e s e nt e nc e tha tw a s gr e a t e rtha n ne c e s s a ry t o f ul f i l l the purpos e s of

18 U . S . C . § 3553( a ) . I n l i ghtof the t ot a l i ty of

the c i r c um s t a nc e s a nd th e s e c tio n 3 5 5 3 ( a ) f

a c to r s , th e s e n te n c e a t th e b o tto m o f th e G u id e lin e s r a n g e is s u b s ta n tiv e ly r e a s o n ab le . Se e Ca r ty , 520 F . 3d a t993. AF F I RME D.
### **CHAPTER 83—BUY AMERICAN**

Sec.
8301.
Definitions.
8302.
American materials required for public use.
8303.
Contracts for public works.
8304.
Waiver rescission.
8305.
Annual report.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 127 (Monday, July 2, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 39321]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-16110]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Eighth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 225, Rechargeable Lithium 
Battery and Battery Systems--Small and Medium Sizes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Meeting Notice of RTCA Special Committee 225, Rechargeable 
Lithium Battery and Battery Systems--Small and Medium Sizes.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
eighth meeting of RTCA Special Committee 225, Rechargeable Lithium 
Battery and Battery Systems--Small and Medium Sizes.

DATES: The meeting will be held July 17-19, 2012, from 9 a.m.-5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC, 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC, 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-
9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a) (2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 225. The agenda will 
include the following:

Tuesday, July 17, 2012

     Introductions and administrative items.
     Review and approve agenda
     Review and approval of summary from last plenary meeting.
     Update to TOR.
     Review schedule for upcoming Plenaries, working group 
meetings, and document preparation.
     Review action items.
     Working Group Meeting--Review draft document.

Wednesday, July 18

     Review agenda, other actions.
     Working Group Meeting--Review draft document.

Thursday, July 19

     Review agenda, other actions.
     Verify dates of next plenary and upcoming working group 
meetings.
     Establish Agenda for next plenary meeting.
     Working Group Meeting--Review draft document.
     Working Group report, review progress and actions.
     Review new action items.
     Adjourn.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 26, 2012.
David Sicard,
Manager, Business Operations Branch, Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-16110 Filed 6-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
### §4301. Definitions

In this chapter:

(1) Compensation.—The term "compensation", for a fiscal year, means the total amount of wages, salary, bonuses, and deferred compensation for the fiscal year, whether paid, earned, or otherwise accruing, as recorded in an employer's cost accounting records for the fiscal year.

(2) Covered contract.—The term "covered contract" means a contract for an amount in excess of $500,000 that is entered into by an executive agency, except that the term does not include a fixed-price contract without cost incentives or any firm fixed-price contract for the purchase of commercial products or commercial services.

(3) Fiscal year.—The term "fiscal year" means a fiscal year established by a contractor for accounting purposes.

(4) Senior executive.—The term "senior executive", with respect to a contractor, means the 5 most highly compensated employees in management positions at each home office and each segment of the contractor.

(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3784; Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §836(b)(17), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1864.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 4301(1) | 41:256(m)(1). | June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title III, §306(m), as added Pub. L. 105–85, title VIII, §808(b)(2), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1836; Pub. L. 105–261, title VIII, §804(b), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2083. |
| 4301(2) | 41:256(l)(1). | June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title III, §306(l)(1), as added Pub. L. 100–700, §8(a)(1), Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4634; Pub. L. 103–355, title II, §2151, Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3315. |
| 4301(3) | 41:256(m)(3). | |
| 4301(4) | 41:256(m)(2). | |

Section

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Par. (2). Pub. L. 115–232 substituted "commercial products or commercial services" for "commercial items".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Jan. 1, 2020, subject to a savings provision, see section 836(h) of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as an Effective Date of 2018 Amendment; Savings Provision note under section 453b of Title 6, Domestic Security.
### **CHAPTER 104—NUCLEAR SAFETY RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND DEMONSTRATION**

Sec.
9701.
Congressional findings and declaration of policy.
9702.
Definitions.
9703.
Research, development, and demonstration program; establishment; purposes; implementation.
9704.
National reactor engineering simulator feasibility study.
9705.
Federal Nuclear Operations Corps' study.
9706.
Dissemination of information.
9707.
Comprehensive program management plan.
9708.
Authorization of appropriations.
#### The German-American Coffee Company, Respondent, v. Clarence A. Diehl, Appellant. (Action No. 2.)

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the opinion of Page, J., at Special Term (reported in 86 Misc. Rep. 547), with leave to the defendant to withdraw the demurrer and to answer on payment of costs in this court and in the court below. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
### §11703. Procurement procedures

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council shall ensure that the process for acquisition of information technology is a simplified, clear, and understandable process that specifically addresses the management of risk, incremental acquisitions, and the need to incorporate commercial information technology in a timely manner.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1252, §11704; renumbered §11703, Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title VIII, §825(c)(2), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2616.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 11704 | 40:1461. | Pub. L. 104–106, div. E, title LII, §5201, Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 689. |

Section

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 11703 was renumbered section 11702 of this title.

#### Amendments

2002—Pub. L. 107–314 renumbered section 11704 of this title as this section.