alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 222 (Thursday, November 18, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 67617]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25637]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE


Bureau of Nonproliferation; Termination of Missile Proliferation 
Sanctions Against a Russian Entity

[Public Notice 4902]

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A determination has been made that sanctions imposed on a 
Russian entity, effective July 22, 2004 (69 FR 43875), pursuant to the 
Arms Export Control Act, as amended, and the Export Administration Act 
of 1979 as amended (as carried out under Executive Order 13222 of 
August 17, 2001) no longer apply.

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 18, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vann H. Van Diepen, Office of 
Chemical, Biological and Missile Nonproliferation, Bureau of 
Nonproliferation, Department of State (202-647-1142).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A determination was made on November 1, 
2004, pursuant to Section 73(b)(1)(A) of the Arms Export Control Act 
(22 U.S.C. 2797b(b)(1)(A)) and Section 11B(b)(2)(A) of the Export 
Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. app. 2410b(b)(2)(A)), as carried 
out under Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001, that the sanctions 
imposed effective July 22, 2004 (69 FR 43875), on the Russian entity 
Federal Research and Production Complex Altay (and its subunits and 
successors) do not apply. A determination was also made to impose 
sanctions against this entity under separate authority, as announced in 
a separate Notice in the Federal Register.

    Dated: November 12, 2004.
Susan F. Burk,
Acting Assistant Secretary of State for Nonproliferation, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 04-25637 Filed 11-17-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-27-P
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 222 (Thursday, November 18, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 67545]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25692]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE:  Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 2 p.m.

LOCATION:  Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, 
Maryland.

STATUS:  Closed to the Public--Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(f)(1) and 16 
CFR 1013.4(b)(3)(7)(9) and (10) and submitted to the Federal Register 
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3).

MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED: Compliance Status Report--The staff will brief 
the Commission on the status of various compliance matters.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20207 (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: November 15, 2004.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04-25692 Filed 11-16-04; 11:42 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-M
#### § 908.10 Penalties.

Knowing and willful violation of any rule adopted under the authority of section 2 of Public Law 92-205 shall subject the person violating such rule to a fine of not more than $10,000, upon conviction thereof.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Tranquility, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 (the Report), I, Dominick Pope, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations. March 28, 2008 /s/ Dominick Pope    Chief Financial Officer
99–008

107TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 107–293

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 3009, ANDEAN

TRADE PROMOTION AND DRUG ERADICATION ACT

NOVEMBER 16 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 15), 2001.—Referred to the House

Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. DIAZ-BALART, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

R E P O R T

[To accompany H. Res. 289]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 289, by a non-record vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration in the House of H.R.

3009, the Andean Trade Promotion and Drug Eradication Act,

under a closed rule. The rule provides one hour of debate equally

divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means.

The rule waives all points of order against consideration of the

bill. This includes a waiver of clause 4(a) of rule XIII requiring a

three-day layover of the committee report. The rule also provides

that the amendment recommended by the Committee on Ways and

Means now printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted.

Finally, the rule provides one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Æ
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Movito Holdings Ltd. (the "Company")
  on 10Q SB for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities
  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jamie Cirotto,
  Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
  to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                        
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                    
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        result of operations of the Company.

|Date: November 14, 2003. |  | /s/Jamie Cirotto       
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|                         |  |                        
|                         |  | (Signature)            
|                         |  |                        
|                         |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                         |  |                        
|                         |  | (Title)                

---
§ 13.9 Receipt of and response to comments. ( a ) The Secretary follows the procedures in § 13.10 if: ( 1 ) A state office or official is designated to act as a single point of contact between a state process and all Federal agencies; and
( 2 ) That office or official transmits a state process recommendation for a program selected under § 13.6.
( b ) ( 1 ) The single point of contact is not obligated to transmit comments from state, areawide, regional or local officials and entities where there is no state process recommendation.
( 2 ) If a state process recommendation is transmitted by a single point of contact, all comments from state, areawide, regional, and local officials and entities that differ from it must also be transmitted.
( c ) If a state has not established a process, or is unable to submit a state process recommendation, state, areawide, regional and local officials and entities may submit comments either to the applicant or to the Department.
( d ) If a program or activity is not selected for a state process, state, areawide, regional and local officials and entities may submit comments either to the applicant or to the Department. In addition, if a state process recommendation for a nonselected program or activity is transmitted to the Department by the single point of contact, the Secretary follows the procedures of § 13.10 of this part.
( e ) The Secretary considers comments which do not constitute a state process recommendation submitted under these regulations and for which the Secretary is not required to apply the procedures of § 13.10 of this part, when such comments are provided by a single point of contact, by the applicant, or directly to the Department by a commenting party.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-0306  -017   021-CV

IN RE 21ST CENTURY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.InN rReE BrRyYaAnN W. AlLdDrRiIdDgGeE	RELATOR

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	The court has considered relator's petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.  Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

	Relator shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL AA:	cayCAYCE, CL..J.; GARDNER,  and WALKERanCAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

DELIVERED: January 21, 2003 February 6, 2006
### SUBCHAPTER I—TRANSFER AND ASSIGNMENT OF RIGHTS, AUTHORITIES, TITLE, AND INTERESTS

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–284, §6(21), Sept. 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 1213, substituted "ASSIGNMENT" for "ASSIGMENT" in heading.
### §6305. Outstationing of counseling and outreach personnel

The Secretary may station employees of the Department at locations other than Department offices, including educational institutions, to provide—

(1) counseling and other assistance regarding benefits under this title to veterans and other persons eligible for benefits under this title; and

(2) outreach services under this subchapter.

(Added Pub. L. 109–233, title IV, §402(a), June 15, 2006, 120 Stat. 409; amended Pub. L. 117–205, §2(b)(2), Oct. 17, 2022, 136 Stat. 2233.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 7724 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 109–233.

#### Amendments

2022—Par. (2). Pub. L. 117–205 substituted "this subchapter" for "this chapter".
# L_2017308EN.01002001.xml

| 23.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 308/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 308/20

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 117/2016

of 3 June 2016

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2017/2135]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Council Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90 (1) was repealed by Regulation (EC) No 470/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council (2), which are incorporated into the EEA Agreement, and consequently the reference to Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90 should be deleted from the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Council Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90 (1) was repealed by Regulation (EC) No 470/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council (2), which are incorporated into the EEA Agreement, and consequently the reference to Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90 should be deleted from the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The text of point 14 (Council Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90) of Chapter XIII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement is deleted.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on 4 June 2016, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 3 June 2016.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 224, 18.8.1990, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 152, 16.6.2009, p. 11.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-22-00045-CV

Bertha Villarreal

v.

Aida Guerrero Villarreal

On Appeal from the

389th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. C-4394-20-H

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

March 9, 2023
#### Lester J. Robinson, III, Appellant, v Jeffrey William Polasky et al., Respondents.

[822 NYS2d 183]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Amy J. Fricano, J.), entered August 11, 2005 in a personal injury action. The order granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: In an action to recover damages for personal injuries arising from an automobile accident, plaintiff appeals *1216from an order granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The complaint, as amplified by the bill of particulars, sought recovery under three categories of serious injury as set forth in Insurance Law § 5102 (d), i.e., the permanent consequential limitation of use, the significant limitation of use and the 90/180 categories. With respect to the 90/180 category, defendants met their initial burden on the motion by submitting excerpts of plaintiffs deposition testimony wherein plaintiff admitted that he did not miss any full days of work after the accident. In response, plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact whether he was unable to perform substantially all of the material acts that constituted his usual and customary daily activities *(see Burns v McCabe,*17 AD3d 1111 [2005]; *Parkhill v Cleary,*305 AD2d 1088, 1090 [2003]; *see also Simpson v Feyrer,*27 AD3d 881 [2006]).

Contrary to the contention of plaintiff, defendants met their initial burden on the motion with respect to the permanent consequential limitation of use and significant limitation of use threshold categories by submitting competent medical evidence establishing as a matter of law that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury under either of those categories *(see Sarkis v Gandy,*15 AD3d 942 [2005]; *Hoffmann v Stechenfinger,*4 AD3d 778, 779 [2004]). In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Winslow v Callaghan,*306 AD2d 853, 854 [2003]). We reject the contention of plaintiff that the affidavit of a chiropractor, stating that plaintiff sustained “lineal annular tearing” of two discs, is sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact. That affidavit did not constitute “ ‘objective evidence of the extent or degree of the alleged physical limitations resulting from th[at] disc injury’ ” *(Owen v Rapid Disposal Serv.,*291 AD2d 782, 782-783 [2002]), inasmuch as it failed to provide a numeric percentage of plaintiffs loss of range of motion or a qualitative assessment of plaintiffs condition *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345, 350 [2002]).

We have considered plaintiff’s remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit. Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Kehoe, Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.
§ 930.57 Consistency certifications. ( a ) Following appropriate coordination and cooperation with the State agency, all applicants for required federal licenses or permits subject to State agency review shall provide in the application to the federal licensing or permitting agency a certification that the proposed activity complies with and will be conducted in a manner consistent with the management program. At the same time, the applicant shall furnish to the State agency a copy of the certification and necessary data and information.
( b ) The applicant's consistency certification shall be in the following form: “The proposed activity complies with the enforceable policies of (name of State) approved management program and will be conducted in a manner consistent with such program.”
OPENING REMARKS OF NRC CHAIRMAN GREGORY B. JACZKO

AT TODAY’S BRIEFING ON EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

Good morning. Before we begin today’s meeting on emergency planning, I would like to 

take a moment to acknowledge Public Service Recognition Week and to thank the NRC staff for 

everything they do on behalf of the American people. Throughout my time with the Commission, 

I have always been impressed by their expertise, experience, and dedication to our important 

mission. Although the Commission never loses sight of the staff’s efforts, I am glad that we have 

the additional opportunity during Public Service Recognition Week to recognize their excellent

work. 

With that, I’ll turn to the subject of today’s meeting – the draft final rule on emergency 

planning, which is currently before the Commission. Effective emergency planning is a key tenet 

of our agency’s defense-in-depth philosophy for protecting public health and safety. Even as we 

work hard to ensure that licensees prevent accidents from happening in the first place, we also 

require that licensees develop strategies to mitigate and contain them in the event that they do.

In line with our national approach to emergency preparedness, we recognize that this is a 

shared responsibility of federal agencies, state and local authorities, and the private sector. That 

is why we have gone well beyond what is formally required to involve the public, licensees, and 

other stakeholders in this process. Throughout this multi-year effort, they actively participated 

and contributed significantly to the development of this rule, and it is a stronger, more effective 

regulation because of their participation. This is a model of how we should approach our 

rulemaking in this area and others.

As you may know, the Japan task force also will examine this issue as part of its 

comprehensive safety review. It is, of course, possible that the task force may make 

recommendations for additional changes to our emergency planning program. That does not, 

however, detract from the importance of finishing the work at hand and moving forward with the 

concrete improvements to our regulatory framework included in this rule.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-074 May 3, 2011
I also want to acknowledge our close working relationship with the Federal Emergency 

Management Agency (FEMA), as well as the strong work of the NRC staff in developing this 

rule.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.
## SUBTITLE V—REGIONAL ECONOMIC AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT

Chapter
Sec.
151.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
15101
153.
REGIONAL COMMISSIONS
15301
155.
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
15501
157.
ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS
15701
# L_2019219EN.01001701.xml

| 22.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 219/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 219/17

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 204/2017

of 27 October 2017

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2019/1367]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/748 of 14 December 2016 amending Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council in order to take into account the evolution of the mass of new light commercial vehicles registered in 2013, 2014 and 2015 (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/748 of 14 December 2016 amending Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council in order to take into account the evolution of the mass of new light commercial vehicles registered in 2013, 2014 and 2015 (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 21ay (Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter III of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32017 R 0748: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/748 of 14 December 2016 (OJ L 113, 29.4.2017, p. 9).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32017 R 0748: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/748 of 14 December 2016 (OJ L 113, 29.4.2017, p. 9).’

Article 2

The text of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/748 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 28 October 2017, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1), or on the day of the entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 111/2017 of 16 June 2017 (2), whichever is the later.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 27 October 2017.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Sabine MONAUNI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 113, 29.4.2017, p. 9.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

(2)  
  OJ L 142, 7.6.2018, p. 45.

2

---