alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 296.9 Activities not permitted for joint ventures. The following activities are not permissible for TIP-funded joint ventures: ( a ) Exchanging information among competitors relating to costs, sales, profitability, prices, marketing, or distribution of any product, process, or service that is not reasonably required to conduct the research and development that is the purpose of such venture;
( b ) Entering into any agreement or engaging in any other conduct restricting, requiring, or otherwise involving the marketing, distribution, or provision by any person who is a party to such joint venture of any product, process, or service, other than the distribution among the parties to such venture, in accordance with such venture, of a product, process, or service produced by such venture, the marketing of proprietary information, such as patents and trade secrets, developed through such venture, or the licensing, conveying, or transferring of intellectual property, such as patents and trade secrets, developed through such venture; and
( c ) Entering into any agreement or engaging in any other conduct: ( 1 ) To restrict or require the sale, licensing, or sharing of inventions or developments not developed through such venture; or
( 2 ) To restrict or require participation by such party in other research and development activities, that is not reasonably required to prevent misappropriation of proprietary information contributed by any person who is a party to such venture or of the results of such venture.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United
States Code), the undersigned officer of Dicut, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of his
knowledge, that:

     1.     The Transition Report on Form 10-KSB for the nine months ended
December 31, 2002 (the "Form 10-KSB") of the Company complies in all
material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.     The information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date: April 16, 2003



/s/ Raj Kalra
Raj Kalra, Chief Executive Officer


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United
States Code), the undersigned officer of Dicut, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of his
knowledge, that:

     1.     The Transition Report on Form 10-KSB for the nine months ended
December 31, 2002 (the "Form 10-KSB") of the Company complies in all
material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.     The information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date: April 16, 2003



/s/ Pierre Quilliam
Pierre Quilliam, Chief Financial Officer
REVISED: NRC SENDS ADDITIONAL EXPERTS TO ASSIST JAPAN

The NRC has sent nine additional experts to Tokyo to provide assistance as requested by the 

Japanese government. Acting as part of a U.S. Agency for International Development assistance 

team, the NRC has dispatched the experts to Tokyo to provide assistance as requested by the 

Japanese government. 

The first members of the team left the United States Monday evening and were due to arrive 

in Tokyo Wednesday afternoon. The team includes additional reactor experts, international affairs 

professional staffers, and a senior manager from one of the NRC’s four operating regions.

The team members come from the NRC’s headquarters in Rockville, Md., and from offices 

in King of Prussia, Pa., Chattanooga, Tenn., and Atlanta. The team has been instructed to: conduct 

all activities needed to understand the status of efforts to safely shut down the Japanese reactors; 

better understand the potential impact on people and the environment of any radioactivity releases; 

if asked, provide technical advice and support through the U.S. ambassador for the Japanese 

government’s decision making process; and draw on NRC-headquarters expertise for any other 

additional technical requirements. The team will be in communication with the Japanese regulator, 

the U.S. Embassy, NRC headquarters, and other government stakeholders as appropriate.

The team is led by Charles A. Casto, deputy regional administrator of the NRC’s Center of 

Construction Inspection, based in NRC’s office in Atlanta. Casto has worked in the commercial 

nuclear power industry at three different nuclear power plants, including Browns Ferry, which has 

three boiling water reactors, operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority in Alabama. He has also 

worked as a licensed reactor operator and operator instructor. Casto will provide a single point of 

contact for the U.S. Ambassador in Japan on nuclear reactor issues.

The two reactor experts sent Saturday to Japan will participate as members of this assistance 

team.

Note To Editors: Revision reflects an additional team member, there are now a total of 11 

NRC staffers on the assistance team. 

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-048R March 14, 2011
STATEMENT OF NRC CHAIRMAN GREGORY B. JACZKO

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Inspector General conducted a 

comprehensive review of the agency’s handling of the High-Level Waste program. The 

conclusions of the report reaffirm that my actions have been and remain consistent with 

established law, guidance, and my authorities as Chairman. With the IG report now 

completed, we can all move forward with a renewed commitment to ensuring public 

health and safety in the use of nuclear materials – the essential mission of the NRC.

The closeout of the Yucca Mountain license review has been a complicated issue, 

with dedicated and experienced people holding different viewpoints. All NRC Chairmen 

have the responsibility to make difficult and sometimes controversial decisions. The IG 

plays an important role in enabling the American people to continue to have confidence 

that my focus as Chairman – and the entire agency’s focus – is on effectively carrying out 

the NRC’s vital safety mission. Thus, I appreciate the thoroughness with which the IG 

and his staff conducted this comprehensive review over the last seven months. 

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a 

SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC’s 

website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-099 June 8, 2011
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

November 1, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00596

- CR

EX PARTE Edwing Ricardo ALVARADO RODRIGUEZ Appellant

From the County Court

, Kinney County, T exas Trial Court No. 10500CR Honorable Tully Shahan , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

A ppellant’s brief is currently due on October 31 , 2022. On October 26, 2022, appellant filed an unopposed motion requesting a sixty

- day extension of time to file his brief. W e GRANT

the motion and ORDER appellant to file his brief by December 30, 2022

. Further requests for

extension s of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 1st day of November, 2022

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Cl erk of Court
* Honorable Richard D. Cudahy, Senior U.S. Circuit Judge for the Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation.

1 Seventy-five heroin pellets were passed over the next thirty hours.

2 Rodriguez sought to suppress both the pellets and some post-arrest statements made to custom officials. The district court granted Rodriguez's motion on the pellets but denied the motion on the statements. The denial of the motion to suppress the statements is not before us. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. No. 94-4768. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. Jaime Antonio RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellee. Feb. 14, 1996. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. (No. 93-490CR-FAM), Federico A. Moreno, Judge. Before EDMONDSON and DUBINA, Circuit Judges, and CUDAHY * , Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM: This case involves a traveler who was suspected of smuggling drugs in his alimentary canal, that is, an internal drug carrier. The traveler was detained for about ninety minutes by customs agents as he entered the country. While he was detained, heroin was discovered as a result of a bowel movement; 1 but the district court ordered that the heroin pellets be suppressed. 2 The government appealed. We reverse and remand for further proceedings. That customs agents had—from the circumstances, including the traveler's inconsistent statements—reasonable suspicion that thetraveler was a drug smuggler is not contested. The question presented involves the significance of a clean bowel movement the traveler had soon after he was detained. The first heroin pellet was excreted in a later bowel movement. The district court concluded that the first bowel movement destroyed the previously existing reasonable suspicion. We disagree. Once reasonable suspicion exists that a person entering the country is an internal drug smuggler, the government may detain the traveler until enough time has passed to allow the contents of the suspected smuggler's stomach to be excreted. See United States v. Henao-Castano, 729 F.2d 1364, 1366 (11th Cir.1984). The traveler-suspect often has some control over the length of his detention; for example, he could choose the usually speedier alternative of an x-ray examination. We accept that there may be limits on how long police can detain a suspected internal carrier (or how many bowel movements can be required); these limits, however, have not been approached in this case where the international traveler was held only ninety minutes and when only two bowel movements were involved. Cf. United States v. Mosquera-Ramirez, 729 F.2d 1352, 1355 (11th Cir.1984) (approving twelve hour detention of suspected swallower who refused x-ray examination); United States v. Onumonu, 967 F.2d 782, 784-85 (2d Cir.1992) (approving six day detention); United States v. Odofin, 929 F.2d 56, 58 (2d Cir.1991) (approving 24 day detention of suspected swallower); United States v. Yakubu, 936 F.2d 936, 937 (7th Cir.1991) (approving 20 hour detention). REVERSED and REMANDED.
§ 700.32 Controlling the general distribution of a material in the civilian market. No allocation action by the Department of Commerce may be used to control the general distribution of a material in the civilian market unless the conditions of paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of this section are met. ( a ) The Secretary has made a written finding that: ( 1 ) Such material is a scarce and critical material essential to the national defense, and
( 2 ) The requirements of the national defense for such material cannot otherwise be met without creating a significant dislocation of the normal distribution of such material in the civilian market to such a degree as to create appreciable hardship.
( b ) The Secretary has submitted the finding for the President's approval through the Assistant to the President and National Security Advisor and the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism.
( c ) The President has approved the finding.
( d ) In this section, the term, “Secretary” means the Secretary of Commerce or his or her designee.
[79 FR 47567, Aug. 14, 2014]
### §2603. Settlement of claims for damages caused by the Postal Service

When the Postal Service finds a claim for damage to persons or property resulting from the operation of the Postal Service to be a proper charge against the United States, and it is not cognizable under section 2672 of title 28, it may adjust and settle the claim.

(Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 745.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1971, pursuant to Resolution No. 71–9 of the Board of Governors. See section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note preceding section 101 of this title.

#### Charge Against Postal Revenues for Settlement of Claims for Damages and for Losses Resulting From Unavoidable Casualty

Pub. L. 89–57, title II, §201, June 30, 1965, 79 Stat. 200, provided in part: "That hereafter settlement of claims, pursuant to law, current and prior fiscal years, for damages, and for losses resulting from unavoidable casualty shall be paid from postal revenues."
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 19 (Tuesday, January 29, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 459]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00178]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center For Scientific Review Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Surgical Sciences, Biomedical Imaging and 
Bioengineering Integrated Review Group; Surgery, Anesthesiology and 
Trauma Study Section.
    Date: February 6-7, 2019.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 
Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Weihua Luo, MD, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5114, MSC 7854, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 435-1170, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f09c859f87b0938382de9e9998de979f86"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="701c051f07301303025e1e19185e171f06">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in 
advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of 
December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 18, 2019.
Sylvia L. Neal,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy .
[FR Doc. 2019-00178 Filed 1-28-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2015

- 6542 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2015

- NM

- 038

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then ou t of the changed cell

.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement)

Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance)

Work

- hours

(include

access, testing,

and close

- up) Labor

cost

(@$8 5 / h

our) Parts Cost Total Costs

(labor +

parts) Number of

U.S.

Registered

Products Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Replacement 4.0 $ 340.00 $638 $ 978.00 

### 197 $ 192,666.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### The known number of products in compl iance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 192,666



### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

On

- Conditi on Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement) Work

- hours

(include access,

testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used t o explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO

Explanation:

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific r equirements for

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
/* styles.css from Reston for homepage redesign 9/2002removed the following:a:link {font-family: Verdana; font-size: 11px;}a:visited {font-family: Verdana; font-size: 11px;}a:active {font-family: Verdana; font-size: 11px;}a:hover {font-family: Verdana; font-size: 11px;}11/15/02-changed link01,link02,lftnavabove,lftnavbelow to black		 added t2links*/a.link01:link {text-decoration: none;}a.link01:visited {text-decoration: none;}a.link01:active {text-decoration: underline;}a.link01:hover {text-decoration: underline;}a.link02:link {text-decoration: none;}a.link02:visited {text-decoration: none;}a.link02:active {text-decoration: underline;}a.link02:hover {text-decoration: underline;}a.link03:link {text-decoration: underline;}a.link03:visited {text-decoration: underline;}a.link03:active {text-decoration: none;}a.link03:hover {text-decoration: none;}/*span {font-family: Verdana; font-size: 11px;} */.head01 {font-weight: bold; color: #FFFFFF;font-family: Verdana; font-size: 11px;}.head02 {font-weight: bold; color: #990000;font-family: Verdana; font-size: 11px;}.copytxt01 {color: #000000;font-family: Verdana; font-size: 11px;}.disctxt01 {color: #7E7E7E;font-family: Verdana; font-size: 11px;}.link01 {color: #000000;font-family: Verdana; font-size: 11px;}.link02 {font-weight: bold; color: #000000;font-family: Verdana; font-size: 11px;}.link03 {font-weight: bold; color: #28287E;font-family: Verdana; font-size: 11px;}.search {font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10px; color: #000000;}/* added for new left nav on tier3 9/2002 by cbiesemeyer */.lftnavtt3 {	font-family: "Times New Roman", serif;	font-size: 12px;	color: #000000;	font-weight: bold;	left-margin: 5%;	text-decoration: none;	}.lftnavbtn {	font-family: Verdana;	font-size: 10px;	color: #ffffff;	font-weight: bold;	left-margin: 5px;	text-decoration: none;	}.lftnavabove {	font-family: Verdana;	font-size: 10px;	color: #000000;	font-weight: bold;	left-margin: 5%;	}.lftnavbelow {	font-family: Verdana;	font-size: 10px;	color: #000000;	font-weight: normal;	}.t2links {	font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;	font-size: 11px;	color: #0000ff;	font-weight: normal;	}	a.lftnavabove:link, a.lftnavabove:visited, a.lftnavbelow:link, a.lftnavbelow:visited,a.t2links:visited, a.t2links:link {	text-decoration: none;	}a.lftnavabove:active, a.lftnavabove:hover, a.lftnavbelow:active, a.lftnavbelow:hover,a.t2links:active, a.t2links:hover {	text-decoration: underline;	}td#secytravels a:hover, td#secytravels a:active 	{text-decoration: underline;	font-family: Arial, sans-serif;	font-size: 13px;	color: #ffffff;	font-weight: bold;}td#secytravels a:link, td#secytravels a:visited 	{text-decoration: underline;	font-family: Arial, sans-serif;	font-size: 13px;	color: #ffffff;	font-weight: bold;}a.nohref {	color: #000000;	text-decoration: none;	}
```

[House Hearing, 107 Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

 
                    IMPROVING ACADEMIC ACHIVEMENT 
                   WITH FREEDOM AND ACCOUNTABILITY

=======================================================================

                                HEARING

                               before the

                      COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND
                             THE WORKFORCE

                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                      ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH CONGRESS

                             FIRST SESSION

                               __________

             HEARING HELD IN CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, MARCH 2, 2001

                               __________

                           Serial No. 107-4

                               __________

            Printed for the use of the Committee on Education
                           and the Workforce

    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED]

```
Conference and Exhibition:  Azerbaijan in the 21st Century: Strategic, Political andCommercial Priorities

----

**March 1999**
The U.S.-Azerbaijan Chamber of Commerce presents
The USACC Third Annual  Conference and Exhibition
April 27 28, 1999
Regal Biltmore Hotel
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6861

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

ROBERT NEAL, SR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, District 

Judge. (0:02-cr-01392-CMC-1)

Submitted: January 10, 2011 Decided: February 11, 2011

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Neal, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Neal, Sr., appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion to compel the Government to file a Fed. R. 

Crim. P. 35 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. United States v. Neal, No. 0:02-cr01392-CMC-1 (D.S.C. Apr. 29, 2010). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED