alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Edward A. Grabowski, as Administrator of the Estate of Edward E. Grabowski, Deceased, Appellant-Respondent, v. Roadway Transit Company, Respondent-Appellant.

All concur. (Cross appeals from an order setting aside the verdict of the jury in favor of plaintiff for $35,000 and granting a new trial unless plaintiff stipulates to reduce the amount to $20,000, in an automobile negligence action.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Victoria Industries, Inc. a Nevada
      corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31,
      2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”), Albert Abdoulline, Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
      certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Victoria Industries, Inc., and will be retained by Victoria Industries, Inc.
      and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.






Date:
                October 1, 2008By:
            /s/
                Albert AbdoullineAlbert
                AbdoullineChief
                Executive Officer
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofstreetTRACKS® Gold Trust (the‘‘Trust’’) on Form 10-Q for the period endingJune 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, J. StuartThomas, principal executive officer of World Gold Trust Services, LLC,the Sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations ofthe Trust.

/s/ J. StuartThomas*        

J. Stuart Thomas**Managing Director(principal executive officer) August 8,2006

|         |                                                                                                                                                      |
|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| *  | The originally executed copy ofthis Certification will be maintained at the Sponsor's officesand will be made available for inspection upon request. |

|          |                                                                                                                                              |
|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| **  | The Registrant is a trust and Mr. Thomas is signingin his capacity as an officer of World Gold Trust Services, LLC, thesponsor of the Trust. |

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Matthew B. Ferguson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of FoxHollow Technologies, Inc. on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of FoxHollow Technologies, Inc.

Date: August 9, 2007



By:

/S/ MATTHEW B. FERGUSONMatthew B. Ferguson Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
### SUBCHAPTER III—PROVISIONS RELATING TO EXPERIMENTAL AND NEW PRODUCTS

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–435, title II, §203, Dec. 20, 2006, 120 Stat. 3207, substituted "PROVISIONS RELATING TO EXPERIMENTAL AND NEW PRODUCTS" for "TEMPORARY RATES AND CLASSES" in subchapter heading.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Louis Barge, Appellant.

Judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Queens, convicting defendant of the crime of book-making, in violation of section 986 of the Penal Law, unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ.
§ 719.12 Matters protected against disclosure. ( a ) *Protective measures.* The ALJ may limit discovery or introduction of evidence or issue such protective or other orders as in the ALJ's judgment may be needed to prevent undue disclosure of classified or sensitive documents or information, including Confidential Business Information as defined by the Act. Where the ALJ determines that documents containing classified or sensitive matter must be made available to a party in order to avoid prejudice, the ALJ may direct the other party to prepare an unclassified and nonsensitive summary or extract of the documents. The ALJ may compare the extract or summary with the original to ensure that it is supported by the source document and that it omits only so much as must remain undisclosed. The summary or extract may be admitted as evidence in the record.
( b ) *Arrangements for access.* If the ALJ determines that the summary procedure outlined in paragraph (a) of this section is unsatisfactory, and that classified or otherwise sensitive matter must form part of the record in order to avoid prejudice to a party, the ALJ may provide the parties opportunity to make arrangements that permit a party or a representative to have access to such matter without compromising sensitive information. Such arrangements may include obtaining security clearances or giving counsel for a party access to sensitive information and documents subject to assurances against further disclosure, including a protective order, if necessary.
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                              CRV MANAGEMENT, INC.



     It is hereby certified that:

     1.   The name of the Corporation (hereinafter called the "Corporation") is:

                              CRV MANAGEMENT, INC.

     2.   Article First of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation
is hereby amended to read as follows:

     FIRST: The name of this Corporation is: Western Hemisphere Investments
Corporation.

     3.   The following new Articles are hereby added to the Certificate of
Incorporation of the Corporation:

     EIGHTH: To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, the Corporation
shall provide indemnification of and advancement of expenses to the
directors and officers of the Corporation.

     Any amendment, repeal or modification of this Article Eighth, or the
adoption of any provision of this Certificate of Incorporation inconsistent with
this Article Eighth, by the stockholders of this Corporation shall not apply to
or adversely affect any right or protection of a director of this Corporation
existing at the time of such amendment, repeal, modification or adoption.

     NINTH: The Corporation reserves the right to adopt, amend, alter,
supplement, rescind or repeal in any respect any provision contained in this
Certificate of Incorporation, in the manner now or hereafter prescribed by
statute or applicable law, and all rights conferred upon stockholders herein are
granted subject to this reservation.

     TENTH: Elections of directors need not be by written ballot unless the
Bylaws of the Corporation shall so provide.

     ELEVENTH: Meetings of stockholders may be held within or without the State
of Delaware, as the Bylaws may provide. The books of the Corporation may be kept
(subject to any statutory requirements) outside the State of Delaware at such
place or places as may be designated from time to time by the Board of Directors
or in the Bylaws of the Corporation.

     4.   The amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation herein certified has
been duly adopted and written consent has been given in accordance
with the provisions of Sections 228 and 242 of the General Corporation
Law of the State of Delaware.



Signed on October 22, 2003                /s/ Gary Ted Ballard
                                          --------------------
                                              Gary Ted Ballard, President
**VENONA Historical Monograph #3:**
** The 1944-45 New York and Washington-Moscow KGB Messages**
#### § 930.104 Objectives.

This subpart requires that agencies (a) establish an efficient and effective system to identify those Federal employees who are qualified and authorized to operate Government-owned or -leased motor vehicles while on official Government business; and (b) periodically review the competence and physical qualifications of these Federal employees to operate such vehicles safely.
|  |
|--|
|  |
|  |
|  |

[Print Friendly Version]
### §7102. Applicability of chapter

(a) Executive Agency Contracts.—Unless otherwise specifically provided in this chapter, this chapter applies to any express or implied contract (including those of the nonappropriated fund activities described in sections 1346 and 1491 of title 28) made by an executive agency for—

(1) the procurement of property, other than real property in being;

(2) the procurement of services;

(3) the procurement of construction, alteration, repair, or maintenance of real property; or

(4) the disposal of personal property.

(b) Tennessee Valley Authority Contracts.—

(1) In general.—With respect to contracts of the Tennessee Valley Authority, this chapter applies only to contracts containing a clause that requires contract disputes to be resolved through an agency administrative process.

(2) Exclusion.—Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, this chapter does not apply to a contract of the Tennessee Valley Authority for the sale of fertilizer or electric power or related to the conduct or operation of the electric power system.

(c) Foreign Government or International Organization Contracts.—If an agency head determines that applying this chapter would not be in the public interest, this chapter does not apply to a contract with a foreign government, an agency of a foreign government, an international organization, or a subsidiary body of an international organization.

(d) Maritime Contracts.—Appeals under section 7107(a) of this title and actions brought under sections 7104(b) and 7107(b) to (f) of this title, arising out of maritime contracts, are governed by chapter 309 or 311 of title 46, as applicable, to the extent that those chapters are not inconsistent with this chapter.

(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3817.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 7102(a)–(c) | 41:602. | Pub. L. 95–563, §§3, 4, Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2383. |
| 7102(d) | 41:603. | |

Section

In subsection (c), the words "an agency head" are substituted for "the head of the agency" for consistency with the defined term "agency head" in section 7101 of the revised title.

In subsection (d), the words "chapter 309 or 311 of title 46" are substituted for "the Act of March 9, 1920, as amended (41 Stat. 525, as amended; 46 U.S.C. 741–752) or the Act of March 3, 1925, as amended (43 Stat. 1112, as amended; 46 U.S.C. 781–790)" in section 4 of the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (Public Law 95–563, 92 Stat. 2384) because of section 18(c) of Public Law 109–304 (46 U.S.C. note prec. 101).
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the

Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 1 7

- BG

- 227

IN RE : WAYNE R. HARTKE

201 6 D DN 374

A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Bar Reg istration No. 200378

BEFORE: Easterly , Associate Judge, and Nebeker and Reid , Senior Judge s

.

O R D E R (FILED

– June 29, 2017)

On consideration of the certified order suspending respondent from the practice of law in Virginia for three years following his stipulation to misconduct involving the failure to correct misrepresentations to bar counsel and his subsequent failure to comply with the conditions of his six

- month suspen sion ; t his

court’s April 14 , 2017

, order su spending respondent pending disposition of this

case and directing him to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed ; the statement of Disciplinary Counsel recommending the substantially

different sanction of a three

- year suspension with a fitness requirement ; and it appearing that respondent did not file a response to this court’s show cause order or file the required D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g) affidavit , it is

ORDERED that Wayne R. Hartke is hereby suspended from the practice of

law in the District of Columbia for three years with a fitness requirement

. See In re Sibley , 990 A.2d 483

, 487

- 88 (D.C. 2010) (explaining that the presumption of identical discipline in D.C. Bar R. XI, § 11 (c) will prevail except in “rare” c ases); D.C. Bar R. XI, § 11 (c)(4), (e) (permitting this court to “impose such discipline as it deems appropriate” where the “misconduct established warrants substantially different discipline in the District of Columbia”); see also In re Cater , 887 A.2d 1

,2

6 , 25 (D.C. 2005) (setting forth the standard for imposition of a fitness requirement and finding such requirement warranted where “the respondent has repeatedly evinced indifference . . . toward the disciplinary procedures by which the Bar regulates itself.” )

. F or purposes of eligibility to petition for reinstatement

, the suspension will not begin to run until such time as respondent files a D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g) affidavit.

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO FURNISHED PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ikanos
Communications, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended April 1, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of Daniel K. Atler, Chief Executive Officer
and President of the Company, and Cory J. Sindelar, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.



|                    |  |                             |  |                                             
|------------------- |  | --------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|                    |  | IKANOS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|                    |  |                            
|Dated: May 11, 2007 |  | By:                         |  | /s/ DANIEL K. ATLER                         
|                    |  |                             |  | Daniel K. Atler                             
|                    |  |                             |  | President and Chief Executive Officer       
|                    |  |                             |  | (Principal Executive Officer)               
|                    |  |                            
|Dated: May 11, 2007 |  | By:                         |  | /s/ CORY J. SINDELAR                        
|                    |  |                             |  | Cory J. Sindelar                            
|                    |  |                             |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  
|                    |  |                             |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Editorial Note on Part 922
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

§ 922.186 Penalties; appeals. ( a ) Pursuant to section 307 of the NMSA, each violation of either of the Acts, or any regulation in this subpart is subject to a civil penalty of not more than $100,000. Each such violation is subject to forfeiture of property or Sanctuary resources seized in accordance with section 307 of the NMSA. Each day of a continuing violation constitutes a separate violation.
( b ) Regulations setting forth the procedures governing the administrative proceedings for assessment of civil penalties for enforcement reasons, issuance and use of written warnings, and release or forfeiture of seized property appear at 15 CFR Part 904.
( c ) A person subject to an action taken for enforcement reasons for violation of these regulations or either of the Acts may appeal pursuant to the applicable procedures in 15 CFR Part 904.
EXHIBIT 99.1


           (Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
                            18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned hereby certify that:

     (i)  This Form 10-KSB, Annual Report, for the period ended December 31,
          2003, as filed by Chestatee Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") with the
          Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
          fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (ii) the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date:  March 28, 2003           BY: /s/J. Philip Hester, Sr.
                                    ------------------------
                                    J. Philip Hester, Sr.
                                    President and
                                    C.E.O. (Principal
                                    Executive Officer)


Date:  March 28, 2003           BY: /s/Deborah F. McLeod
                                    --------------------
                                    Deborah F. McLeod, C.F.O. and Treasurer
                                    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
§ 700.34 Elements of an allocation order. Allocation orders may be issued directly to the affected persons or by constructive notice to the parties through publication in the Federal Register. This section describes the elements that each order must include. ( a ) *Elements to be included in all allocation orders.* ( 1 ) A detailed description of the required allocation action(s), including its relationship to previously or subsequently received DX rated orders, DO rated orders, and unrated orders.
( 2 ) Specific start and end calendar dates for each required allocation action.
( b ) *Elements to be included in orders issued directly to affected persons.* ( 1 ) A statement that reads in substance: “This is an allocation order certified for national defense use. [Insert the name of the person receiving the order] is required to comply with this order, in accordance with the provisions of the Defense Priorities and Allocations System regulation (15 CFR part 700).”
( 2 ) The written signature on a manually placed order, or the digital signature or name on an electronically placed order, of an authorized official or employee of the Department of Commerce.
( c ) *Elements to be included in an allocation order issued by constructive notice through publication in the* Federal Register. ( 1 ) A statement that reads in substance: “This is an allocation order certified for national defense use. [Insert the name(s) of the person(s) to whom the order applies or a description of the class of persons to whom the order applies] is (are) required to comply with this order, in accordance with the provisions of the Defense Priorities and Allocations System regulation (15 CFR part 700).”
( 2 ) The order must be signed by an authorized official or employee of the Department of Commerce.
[79 FR 47567, Aug. 14, 2014, as amended at 89 FR 58973, July 22, 2024]
NRC APPROVES USEC’S PLAN TO RETURN PORTSMOUTH GASEOUS 

DIFFUSION ENRICHMENT PLANT TO DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved the United States Enrichment Corp. 

(USEC)’s plan to return the remainder of the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant (GDP) to the 

regulatory control of the Department of Energy (DOE) and to terminate the NRC’s Certificate of 

Compliance for the plant.

USEC requested termination of its certification in letters to the NRC dated March 15 and 

June 28. As part of the termination process, USEC will terminate its lease with DOE for the 

remaining facilities at the plant still under USEC control. 

The Portsmouth plant, located near Piketon, Ohio, was a DOE-owned uranium 

enrichment plant that was transferred to USEC when that company was created and later 

privatized in the 1990s. USEC terminated enrichment operations in 2001 and has maintained the 

plant in cold standby since. In September 2010, USEC transferred the main process buildings 

back to DOE control. As part of the current certificate termination, USEC will transfer the 

remainder of the facility, including NRC-regulated material, to DOE, which will regulate the 

plant under 10 CFR 830. At that point, NRC regulation under 10 CFR 76 will no longer be 

necessary.

DOE has agreed to assume regulatory authority over the plant and take possession and 

ownership of USEC-generated nuclear material at the site. Before the Certificate of Compliance 

can be terminated, USEC must certify to the NRC that all material has been transferred to DOE’s 

possession and ensure proper accounting of all material in the Nuclear Material Management and 

Safeguards System. Upon receiving and verifying USEC’s certification of the transfer, the NRC 

will issue a letter terminating the Certificate of Compliance.

USEC’s Lead Cascade and American Centrifuge Plant, under construction, are unaffected 

by the termination of the GDP certificate. They remain under NRC license and regulation under 

10 CFR 70.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-182 September 28, 2011