alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Joseph C. Swensen, Respondent, v. James Da Cruze et al., Appellants.

Oral representations made prior to the execution of an agreement for the purchase and sale of real property are deemed merged in the written contract. The alleged oral representations made thereafter are without consideration. *(Strauss*v. *Levitt & Sons,*244 App. Div. 739; *Eighmie*v. *Taylor,*98 N. Y. 288.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur. [See *post,*p. 758.]
### §5314A. Dispute of indebtedness

(a) Establishment.—The Secretary shall prescribe regulations that establish an administrative process for the dispute of the existence or amount of an indebtedness described in section 5314(a)(1) of this title (without regard to whether the Secretary has made a deduction under such section regarding such indebtedness).

(b) Standards.—The process under subsection (a) shall be efficient, effective, and equitable.

(c) Timeliness.—The Secretary shall ensure that each dispute under subsection (a) proceeds in accordance with standards for timeliness prescribed by the Secretary under this section.

(d) Limitation.—The Secretary may not submit to any debt collector (as defined in section 803 of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (15 U.S.C. 1692a)) any dispute pending under this section.

(e) Rule of Construction.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to modify the procedures for seeking review of a decision of the agency of original jurisdiction described in section 5104C(a)(1) of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 117–328, div. U, title II, §255(b)(1), Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5464.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Administrative Process for Dispute of Indebtedness and Improvements to Department Website

Pub. L. 117–328, div. U, title II, §255(b)(2), (3), Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5465, provided that:

"(2) Existing administrative process.—The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall carry out section 5314A of such title, as added by paragraph (1), by improving the administrative process of the Department of Veterans Affairs for the dispute of the existing or amount of an indebtedness that was in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 29, 2022].

"(3) Improvements to department website and notices.—In carrying out paragraph (2), the Secretary shall—

"(A) improve the website of the Department; and

"(B) ensure that such website and written notices sent to a person about indebtedness described in section 5314(a) of title 38, United States Code, contain all information a person needs to dispute such an indebtedness, including a description of—

"(i) the specific actions the person will need to take in order to dispute the indebtedness;

"(ii) the documentation that will be required for the dispute; and

"(iii) how the documentation is to be submitted."
### §6113. Duties of the Superintendent of the Supreme Court Building

Except as provided in section 6111(a) of this title, all duties and work required for the operation, domestic care, and custody of the Supreme Court Building shall be performed under the direction of the Marshal of the Supreme Court. The Marshal serves as the superintendent of the Building.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1181.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6113 | 40:13c. | May 7, 1934, ch. 222, §3, 48 Stat. 668; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §27, 62 Stat. 990. |

Section

The words "Except as provided in section 6111(a) of this title" are substituted for "other" for clarity.
§ 900.412 Effect on other regulations, forms, and instructions. ( a ) *Effect on other regulations.* Regulations, orders, or like directions issued before the effective date of this subpart by OPM which impose requirements designed to prohibit discrimination against individuals on the ground of race, color, or national origin under a program to which this subpart applies, and which authorizes the suspension or termination of or refusal to grant or to continue Federal financial assistance to an applicant for or recipient of assistance under a program for failure to comply with the requirements, are superseded to the extent that discrimination is prohibited by this subpart, except that nothing in this subpart relieves a person of an obligation assumed or imposed under a superseded regulation, order, instruction, or like direction, before the effective date of this subpart. This subpart does not supersede any of the following (including future amendments thereof): ( 1 ) Executive Order 11246 (3 CFR, 1965 Supp.) and regulations issued thereunder or
( 2 ) any other orders, regulations, or instructions, insofar as these orders, regulations, or instructions prohibit discrimination on the ground of race, color, or national origin in a program or situation to which this subpart is inapplicable, or prohibit discrimination on any other ground.
( b ) *Forms and instructions.* OPM shall issue and promptly make available to all interested persons forms and detailed instructions and procedures for effectuating this subpart as applied to programs to which this subpart applies, and for which it is responsible.
( c ) *Supervision and coordination.* The Director, Office of Personnel Management may from time to time assign to officials of OPM, or to officials of other departments or agencies of the Government with the consent of the departments or agencies, responsibilities in connection with the effectuation of the purposes of title VI and this subpart (other than responsibilities for final decision as provided in § 900.410), including the achievement of effective coordination and maximum uniformity within OPM and within the executive branch in the application of title VI and this subpart to similar programs and in similar situations. An action taken, determination made, or requirement imposed by an official of another department or agency acting pursuant to an assignment of responsibility under this paragraph shall have the same effect as though the action had been taken by OPM.
#### § 1500.12 Machine cavities.

*Machine cavities* means the cavities with which a block machine could be equipped.
#### § 785.20 Reporting a violation.

If a person learns that a violation of the Additional Protocol, the Act, or the APR has occurred or may occur, that person may notify: Office of Export Enforcement, Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Room H-4520, Washington, DC 20230; Tel: (202) 482-1208; Facsimile: (202) 482-0964.
§ 9801.201 Requests for access. ( a ) *How addressed.* A requester seeking access to records pertaining to the requester in a CIGIE system of records should submit a written request that includes the words “Privacy Act Request” on both the envelope and at the top of the request letter to the Executive Director, Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency, 1717 H Street NW., Suite 825, Washington, DC 20006.
( b ) *Description of records sought.* ( 1 ) A request should contain a specific reference to the CIGIE system of records from which access to the records is sought. Notices of CIGIE systems of records subject to the Privacy Act are published in the Federal Register, and copies of the notices are available on CIGIE's Web site at *www.ignet.gov ,* or upon request from CIGIE's Office of General Counsel.
( 2 ) If the written inquiry does not refer to a specific system of records, it must describe the records that are sought in enough detail to enable CIGIE personnel to locate the system of records containing them with a reasonable amount of effort.
( 3 ) The request should state whether the requester wants a copy of the record or wants to examine the record in person.
( c ) *Verification of identity.* A requester seeking access to records pertaining to the requester must verify their identity in their request. The request must state the requester's full name, current address, and date and place of birth. The requester must sign the request and the signature must either be notarized or state, “Under penalty of perjury, I hereby declare that I am the person named above and I understand that any falsification of this statement is punishable under the provisions of Title 18, United States Code (U.S.C.), Section 1001 by a fine of not more than $10,000 or by imprisonment of not more than five years, or both; and that requesting or obtaining any record(s) under false pretenses is punishable under the provisions of Title 5, U.S.C., Section 552a(i)(3) as a misdemeanor and by a fine of not more than $5,000.” In order to help the identification and location of requested records, the requester may optionally include their social security number. No identification shall be required if the records are required by 5 U.S.C. 552 to be released.
( d ) *Verification of guardianship.* When making a request as the parent or guardian of a minor or as the guardian of someone determined by a court to be incompetent for access to records about that individual, the requester must establish: ( 1 ) The identity of the individual who is the subject of the record, by stating the name, current address, date and place of birth, and, at the requester's option, the social security number of the individual;
( 2 ) The requester's identity, as required in paragraph (c) of this section;
( 3 ) That the requester is the parent or guardian of that individual, which may be established by providing a copy of the individual's birth certificate showing the requester's parentage or by providing a court order establishing the requester's guardianship; and
( 4 ) That the requester is acting on behalf of that individual in making the request.
§ 930.112 Request for Secretarial mediation. ( a ) The Secretary or other head of a Federal agency, or the Governor or the State agency, may notify the Secretary in writing of the existence of a serious disagreement, and may request that the Secretary seek to mediate the disagreement. A copy of the written request must be sent to the agency with which the requesting agency disagrees, to the Assistant Administrator, and to the Director.
( b ) Within 15 days following receipt of a request for mediation the disagreeing agency shall transmit a written response to the Secretary, and to the agency requesting mediation, indicating whether it wishes to participate in the mediation process. If the disagreeing agency declines the offer to enter into mediation efforts, it must indicate the basis for its refusal in its response. Upon receipt of a refusal to participate in mediation efforts, the Secretary shall seek to persuade the disagreeing agency to reconsider its decision and enter into mediation efforts. If the disagreeing agencies do not all agree to participate, the Secretary will cease efforts to provide mediation assistance.
**GAO-02-1114R**                      Published: Sep 20, 2002. Publicly Released: Sep 20, 2002.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Status of FY22 Projects 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

GAO reviewed the audit reports covering the financial statements of the National Fund for Medical Education, for fiscal year 2000. GAO found no reportable instances of noncompliance. The audit reports included the auditors' opinions that the financial statements of the corporation were presented fairly in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

## Full Report

Full Report (2 pages)

Accessible Text 

## Office of Public Affairs

### Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

### Public Inquiries

Public Affairs
PublicAffairs@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

Auditing and Financial Management

Audit reportsAuditing standardsFederal corporationsFinancial statement auditsReporting requirementsFinancial statementsMedical educationFederally chartered corporationFinancial managementRegulatory noncompliance
#### GRANVILLE-SMITH v. GRANVILLE-SMITH.

No. 11354.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted June 25, 1954.

Decided July 13, 1954.

Dudley, Hoffman & McGowan, Charlotte Amalie, St. Thomas, V. I., Arnold, Fortas & Porter, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Warren H. Young, Christiansted, St. Croix, V. I., for appellee.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and MARIS, GOODRICH, MeLAUGHLIN, KA-LODNER, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This case is the same with regard to all operative facts and principles of law as Alton v. Alton, 3 Cir., 1953, 207 F.2d 667, certiorari granted, 1954, 347 U.S. 911, 74 S.Ct. 478; proceedings dismissed because moot, June 1, 1954. That decision must govern this. While individual members of the Court have not modified their views as set out' in the opinions in that case, all recognize the authority of a decision rendered after due consideration by the Court en banc.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.
NRC SCHEDULES CONFERENCE 

WITH FPL FOR FEB. 21 TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATIONS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a meeting with officials of

Florida Power and Light Co., for Tuesday, Feb. 21 to discuss apparent violations of NRC 

requirements related to the company’s failure to properly maintain the Turkey Point nuclear 

plant’s onsite emergency response facility.

The plant, operated by FPL, is located about 25 miles south of Miami near Homestead, 

Fla.

The meeting will begin at 1 p.m. EST at the NRC Region II office in Atlanta, located at 

245 Peachtree Center Ave., Suite 1200. The meeting will be open to the public and NRC 

officials will be available after the meeting to answer any questions. Anyone interested in 

attending the meeting or participating by telephone should contact the NRC's Daniel Rich at 404-

997-4721 or Daniel.Rich@nrc.gov or Michael Donithan at 404-997-4538 or 

Michael.Donithan@nrc.gov.

The purpose of the meeting is to discuss apparent violations associated with the failure to 

properly maintain Turkey Point’s Technical Support Center, an onsite emergency response 

facility. Specifically, on two different occasions in 2010 and 2011, plant personnel disabled 

portions of the TSC ventilation system, which would have left the facility unusable during a 

radiological emergency had one occurred.

The NRC evaluates regulatory performance at commercial nuclear power plants with a 

color-coded process which classifies regulatory findings as either green, white, yellow or red, in 

order of increasing safety significance. The failure to properly maintain the TSC ventilation 

system has been preliminarily determined by the NRC to be “white,” or of low to moderate 

safety significance.

FPL also failed to inform the NRC of the TSC’s inoperability, an apparent violation of 

NRC requirements. That violation is being evaluated using the NRC’s traditional enforcement 

process and could result in a civil penalty because it impeded the regulatory process. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No: II-12-002

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416 

 February 14, 2012

E-mail: OPA2.Resource@nrc.gov
No decision on enforcement action will be made at the meeting. NRC officials will 

review information presented by FPL at the meeting and reach a decision on appropriate 

regulatory action at a later date.

An NRC inspection report with information on the issue is available through the NRC 

website at www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. The number to access the document is 

ML120260599.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofstreetTRACKS® Gold Trust (the"Trust") on Form 10-Q for the period endingMarch 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. StuartThomas, principal executive officer of World Gold Trust Services, LLC,the Sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations ofthe Trust.

/s/ J. StuartThomas*        

J. Stuart Thomas**Managing Director(principal executive officer) May 11,2005

|         |                                                                                                                                                      |
|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| *  | The originally executed copy ofthis Certification will be maintained at the Sponsor's officesand will be made available for inspection upon request. |

|          |                                                                                                                                              |
|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| **  | The Registrant is a trust and Mr. Thomas is signingin his capacity as an officer of World Gold Trust Services, LLC, thesponsor of the Trust. |

----
### §4309. Burden of proof on contractor

In a proceeding before a board of contract appeals, the United States Court of Federal Claims, or any other Federal court in which the reasonableness of indirect costs for which a contractor seeks reimbursement from the Federal Government is in issue, the burden of proof is on the contractor to establish that those costs are reasonable.

(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3788.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 4309 | 41:256(j). | June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title III, §306(j), as added Pub. L. 100–700, §8(a)(1), Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4634; Pub. L. 103–355, title II, §2151, Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3313. |

Section
### Part C—National Clearinghouse
# L_2020068EN.01006101.xml

| 5.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 68/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 68/61

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 309/2019

of 13 December 2019

amending Annex IX (Financial Services) to the EEA Agreement [2020/327]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/1229 of 25 May 2018 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards on settlement discipline (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/1229 of 25 May 2018 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards on settlement discipline (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex IX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex IX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 31bfg (Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/2030) of Annex IX to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘31bfh. | 32018 R 1229: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/1229 of 25 May 2018 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards on settlement discipline (OJ L 230, 13.9.2018, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘31bfh.

32018 R 1229: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/1229 of 25 May 2018 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards on settlement discipline (OJ L 230, 13.9.2018, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/1229 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 14 December 2019, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1), or on the day of the entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 18/2019 of 8 February 2019 (2), whichever is the later.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 13 December 2019.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gunnar PÁLSSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 230, 13.9.2018, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

(2)  
  OJ L 60, 28.2.2019, p. 31.

2

---