UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C.  20549

                                   FORM 10-QSB

[X]  QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
     OF 1934

          For the quarterly period ended  March 31, 2002
                                          --------------


[ ]  TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
     OF 1934

          For the transition period from __________ to __________

          Commission file number:  0 - 50235
                                   ---------


                       PERFORMANCE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC
         ---------------------------------------------------------------
        (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

          California                                03-0375751
------------------------------            -------------------------------
State or other jurisdiction of           (IRS Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization


          222 South Harbor Blvd., Suite 400, Anaheim, California 92805
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    (Address of principal executive offices)


                                 (714) 502-3780
                           -------------------------
                          (Issuer's telephone number)


    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    (Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
                                    report.)

Check  whether  the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section
13  or  15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter
period  that  the  issuer  was  required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes [ ]  No [X]


                      APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common
equity,  as of the latest practicable date: As of March 31, 2002, the issuer had
571,550  LLC  Units  issued  and  outstanding.


Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one):  Yes [ ]  No [X]


<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                       PERFORMANCE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC

                                    INDEX TO
                         QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB
                      FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2002


PART  I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION                                                              PAGE
<S>                                                                                          <C>
Item 1    Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  1

          Accountants' Review Report

          Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2002 (unaudited)

          Statement of Operations for the period from Inception (February 4, 2002) to
          March 31, 2002 (unaudited)

          Statement of Members' Equity for the period from Inception (February 4, 2002) to
          March 31, 2002 (unaudited)

          Statement of Cash Flows for the period from Inception (February 4, 2002) to
          March 31, 2002 (unaudited)

          Notes to the Financial Statements (unaudited)

Item 2    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
          Results of Operations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17


PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1    Legal Proceedings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

Item 2    Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

Item 4    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

Item 5    Other Events . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

Item 6    Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

SIGNATURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

CERTIFICATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
</TABLE>


<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


            [MOORE STEPHENS WURTH FRAZER AND TORBET, LLP LETTERHEAD]





To the Board of Directors
Performance Capital Management, LLC
Anaheim, California

We  have  reviewed  the  accompanying  balance  sheet  of  Performance  Capital
Management,  LLC,  as of March 31, 2002 and the related statements of operations
and  members'  equity  and cash flows for the period from inception (February 4,
2002)  through  March  31,  2002, in accordance with Statements on Standards for
Accounting  and  Review  Services  issued by the American Institute of Certified
Public  Accountants.  All  information included in these financial statements is
the  representation  of  the  management of Performance Capital Management, LLC.

A  review  consists principally of inquiries of Company personnel and analytical
procedures applied to financial data.  It is substantially less in scope than an
audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of
which  is  the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken
as  a  whole.  Accordingly,  we  do  not  express  such  an  opinion.

Based  on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be  made  to  the  accompanying  financial statements in order for them to be in
conformity  with  generally  accepted  accounting  principles.


/s/ Moore Stephens Wurth Frazer And Torbet, LLP

March 14, 2003
City of Industry, California




                                        1
<PAGE>
                       PERFORMANCE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC

                                  BALANCE SHEET
                              AS OF MARCH 31, 2002
                        (See Accountants' Review Report)
                        --------------------------------


                          ASSETS
                          ------

<S>                                          <C>
  Cash and cash equivalents                  $2,923,673
  Restricted cash                                21,355
  Other receivables                               6,848
  Purchased loan portfolios, net              4,563,669
  Property and equipment, net                   704,299
  Deposits                                       74,684
  Prepaid expenses and other assets              83,616
                                             ----------

      Total assets                           $8,378,144
                                             ==========




             LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS' EQUITY
             -------------------------------

LIABILITIES:
  Accounts payable                           $  168,489
  Pre-petition claims                           881,880
  Accrued liabilities                           310,520
  Income taxes payable                            2,948
                                             ----------
      Total liabilities                       1,363,837

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES                         -

MEMBERS' EQUITY                               7,014,307
                                             ----------

      Total liabilities and members' equity  $8,378,144
                                             ==========
</TABLE>



         The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.


                                        2
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                       PERFORMANCE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC

                             STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
            FROM INCEPTION (FEBRUARY 4, 2002) THROUGH MARCH 31, 2002
                        (See Accountants' Review Report)
                        --------------------------------


<S>                                         <C>
REVENUES:
  Portfolio collections                     $1,210,119
  Portfolio sales                               60,843
                                            -----------
    Total revenues                           1,270,962
  Less portfolio basis recovery                899,587
                                            -----------

NET REVENUES                                   371,375
                                            -----------

OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES:
  Salaries and benefits                        797,977
  General and administrative                   384,012
  Depreciation                                  34,387
                                            -----------
    Total operating costs and expenses       1,216,376
                                            -----------

LOSS FROM OPERATIONS                          (845,001)
                                            -----------

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
  Reorganization costs                         (53,598)
  Interest income                               25,257
  Other income                                  12,902
                                            -----------
    Total other expense, net                   (15,439)
                                            -----------

LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAX PROVISION              (860,440)

INCOME TAX PROVISION                             2,948
                                            -----------

NET LOSS                                    $ (863,388)
                                            ===========
</TABLE>



         The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.


                                        3
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                       PERFORMANCE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC

                          STATEMENT OF MEMBERS' EQUITY
            FROM INCEPTION (FEBRUARY 4, 2002) THROUGH MARCH 31, 2002
                        (See Accountants' Review Report)
                        --------------------------------



                                                             Total
                            Unreturned     Accumulated      Members'
                              Capital        Deficit         Equity
                           -------------  -------------  -------------
<S>                        <C>            <C>            <C>
Balance, February 4, 2002  $ 38,116,880   $(18,239,185)  $ 19,877,695

Distribution to investors   (12,000,000)             -    (12,000,000)

Net loss                              -       (863,388)      (863,388)
                           -------------  -------------  -------------

Balance, March 31, 2002    $ 26,116,880   $(19,102,573)  $  7,014,307
                           =============  =============  =============
</TABLE>



         The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.


                                        4
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                       PERFORMANCE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC

                             STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
            FROM INCEPTION (FEBRUARY 4, 2002) THROUGH MARCH 31, 2002
                        (See Accountants' Review Report)
                        --------------------------------

<S>                                                 <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
  Net loss                                          $   (863,388)
  Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
    used in operating activities:
      Depreciation                                        34,387
      Decrease in other receivable                        84,211
      Increase in other current assets                   (38,615)
      Decrease in loan portfolios                        199,536
      Decrease in accounts payable                       (65,833)
      Decrease in pre-petition claims                     (2,394)
      Increase in accrued liabilities                     64,602
      Increase in income taxes payable                     2,948
                                                    -------------
        Net cash used in operating activities           (584,546)


CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
  Distribution to investors                          (12,000,000)
                                                    -------------

NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS              (12,584,546)

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period        15,529,574
                                                    -------------

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period            $  2,945,028
                                                    =============

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE FOR CASH FLOW INFORMATION:

  Income taxes paid                                 $     10,874
                                                    =============

  Interest paid                                     $          -
                                                    =============
</TABLE>



         The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.


                                        5
<PAGE>
                       PERFORMANCE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC

                        NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                        (See Accountants' Review Report)
                        --------------------------------

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Performance  Capital  Management, LLC ("PCM LLC" or "the Company") is engaged in
the business of acquiring assets originated by federal and state banks and other
sources,  for  the  purpose  of  generating  income and cash flow from managing,
collecting,  or  selling  those  assets.  These assets consist of non-performing
credit  card  loan  portfolios  and  are  purchased  and  sold  as  portfolios
("portfolios").  Additionally,  some loan portfolios are assigned to third party
agencies  for  collection.

Reorganization Under Bankruptcy
-------------------------------

PCM  LLC  was  formed  under  a  Chapter  11  Bankruptcy Reorganization Plan and
operating  agreement.  The  plan called for the consolidation of five California
limited  partnerships  and  a  California  Corporation  into  the new California
Limited  Liability Company. The five California limited partnerships were formed
for  the  purpose  of  acquiring  investments  in  or  direct  ownership  of
non-performing credit card loan portfolios from financial institutions and other
sources.  The  general partner for the partnerships was Performance Development,
Inc.,  a  California  corporation  ("PDI").  PDI  was removed as general partner
during  bankruptcy.  The  assets  of  the  five  limited  partnerships consisted
primarily  of  non-performing  credit  card  loans, as well as cash. PCM LLC was
formed on January 14, 2002 and commenced operations upon the confirmation of its
Bankruptcy  Reorganization Plan ("Reorganization Plan") on February 4, 2002. The
entities  that  were  consolidated under the Reorganization Plan are as follows:

Performance  Asset  Management  Fund,  Ltd.,-  (PAM),  a  California  Limited
Partnership,  formed  in  1991.  Units  in  PAM were sold in a private placement
offering.  PAM  raised  $5,205,000  in  gross  proceeds  from  the  sale  of its
partnership  units.  PAM  was  not  subject to the reporting requirements of the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission.

Performance  Asset  Management  Fund  II, Ltd.,- (PAMII),  a  California Limited
Partnership,  formed  in  1992.  Units in PAMII were sold in a private placement
offering.  PAMII  raised  $7,670,000  in  gross  proceeds  from  the sale of its
partnership  units.  PAMII  was not subject to the reporting requirements of the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission.

Performance  Asset  Management  Fund  III, Ltd.,- (PAMIII), a California Limited
Partnership,  formed  in  1992. Units in PAMIII were sold in a private placement
offering  pursuant  to  Regulation  D promulgated by the Securities and Exchange
Commission on a "best efforts" basis. PAMIII raised $9,990,000 in gross proceeds
from  the sale of its partnership units. PAMIII was a public limited partnership
that  was  subject  to the reporting requirements of the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

Performance  Asset  Management  Fund  IV,  Ltd., - (PAMIV), a California Limited
Partnership,  formed in 1992. Units in PAMIV were sold in an intrastate offering
to  residents  of  California, pursuant to the provisions of Section 3(A)(11) of
the  Securities Act of 1933. PAMIV raised $28,595,000 in gross proceeds from the
sale  of  its partnership units. PAMIV was a public limited partnership that was
subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Performance   Asset   Management  Fund V,  Ltd., - (PAMV), a  California Limited
Partnership,  formed  in  1994.  Units  in PAMV were sold in a private placement
offering.  PAMV  raised  $5,965,000  in  gross  proceeds  from  the  sale of its
partnership  units.  PAMV  was  not subject to the reporting requirements of the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission.

Performance  Capital  Management,  Inc.  (PCM  INC),  a  California  corporation
incorporated  in  January  1993.  PCM  INC  identified  potential  portfolio
acquisitions,  performed  due  diligence in conjunction with potential portfolio
acquisitions,  acquired  portfolios, and through joint ventures with the limited
partnerships  (PAM,  PAMII, PAMIII, PAMIV, and PAMV) collected and sold acquired
portfolios.  The  limited  partnerships  (PAM,  PAMII,  PAMIII,


                                        6
<PAGE>
                       PERFORMANCE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC

                        NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                        (See Accountants' Review Report)
                        --------------------------------

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS, (CONTINUED)

Reorganization Under Bankruptcy, (continued)
--------------------------------------------

PAMIV,  and  PAMV)  collectively obtained 98.5% of the outstanding shares of PCM
INC.  The minority interest of 1.5% was effectively eliminated in the bankruptcy
plan.

Pre-Petition  Operations
------------------------

At all times before the bankruptcy, Vincent Galewick was the sole or controlling
shareholder  of  PCM  INC and PDI which served as general partner of the limited
partnerships  (PAM,  PAMII,  PAMIII,  PAMIV, and PAMV). A total of approximately
$57,450,000  was  raised  over  the  period  1991  to  1994  by  selling limited
partnership interests in PAM, PAMII, PAMIII, PAMIV, and PAMV. Approximately $8.7
million  was  deducted  for brokerage and organizational expenses. Approximately
$49  million  was  used  to purchase non-performing credit card loan portfolios.
These  portfolios  were typically purchased by the limited partnerships from PCM
INC.  PCM  INC  also  collected  the  portfolios  under joint venture agreements
between  itself  and  the  limited  partnerships.

In  the  normal  course  of  business,  loan  portfolios  would  be  purchased,
collections  would  be  made and in some cases the portfolios were sold. PCM INC
was  in  the  business  of  managing  these  loan  portfolios.

PCM INC generally charged a "mark-up" to the limited partnerships for portfolios
purchased  for  the  limited  partnerships.  This  markup averaged 35% above the
price  PCM  INC  paid  for  the portfolios on the open market.  PCM INC was also
contractually entitled to receive 45% of all monies collected on the portfolios.

In addition, PDI, former general partner of the limited partnerships, received a
management fee from the limited partnerships ranging from 2 to 2 1/2% of the net
asset  value  of  the loan portfolio on an annual basis and 10% of the amount of
any  distributions  to  the  limited  partners.

Numerous  issues  and claims were settled between the parties by the bankruptcy.
This  settlement  referred  to as "Intercompany Settlement" removed Mr. Galewick
from  any  further  role in the affairs of PCM INC and the limited partnerships,
transferred  to  the  Trustee  all claims of Mr. Galewick and others against the
limited  partners  and  controlling  interest  in  PCM INC thereby according the
limited  partners control over the entity which administered their assets.   The
Trustee  and  a  committee of equity security holders representing the PAM Funds
released  any  claims  of  the  debtor's  estate  against  Mr.  Galewick and Mr.
Galewick's  affiliates.  Inter-debtor  claims  were released and withdrawn.  Mr.
Galewick  received  consideration  from  the  bankruptcy  estates of the limited
partners.  As part of the settlement, PDI was removed as general partner and the
Trustee  resigned  as  Trustee  for  PDI,  thus  returning control of PDI to Mr.
Galewick.

The  following  is  a  summary  of the ownership interest of Performance Capital
Management, LLC pursuant to the terms of the Reorganization Plan:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Member's  Number of    Number of        Percentage
  Name    Investors  PCM LLC Units  Interest in PCM LLC
--------  ---------  -------------  -------------------
<S>       <C>        <C>            <C>
PAM             370         52,050                    9
PAMII           459         76,700                   14
PAMIII          595         99,900                   17
PAMIV          1153        285,950                   50
PAMV            327         56,950                   10
                     -------------  -------------------
Totals                     571,550                  100
                     =============  ===================
</TABLE>


                                        7
<PAGE>
                       PERFORMANCE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC

                        NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                        (See Accountants' Review Report)
                        --------------------------------


NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS, (CONTINUED)

The  Reorganization  Plan  calls  for  distributions to be made first to the LLC
Members  to  the  extent  of  and  in  proportion  to  their  unreturned Capital
Contributions;  and  thereafter  to  the  LLC  Members  in  proportion  to their
respective  percentage  ownership  interest.

The  combination  of  the  Partnerships and PCM INC is summarized as follows (in
thousands):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                   PAM      PAMII     PAMIII    PAMIV      PAMV     PCM INC     Total
                                ---------  --------  --------  --------  --------  ---------  ---------
<S>                             <C>        <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>        <C>
Sale of Limited
  Partnership Units             $  5,205   $ 7,670   $ 9,990   $28,595   $ 5,965   $      -   $ 57,425

Distributions
  to Investors                    (3,704)   (4,137)   (3,719)   (6,920)     (829)         -    (19,309)
                                ---------  --------  --------  --------  --------  ---------  ---------

Unreturned Capital                 1,501     3,533     6,271    21,675     5,136          -     38,116

Accumulated Deficit                 (288)   (1,333)   (2,424)   (9,330)   (2,561)    (2,302)   (18,238)
                                ---------  --------  --------  --------  --------  ---------  ---------

Cash and Net Assets
  Transferred to PCM LLC        $  1,213   $ 2,200   $ 3,847   $12,345   $ 2,575   $ (2,302)    19,878
                                =========  ========  ========  ========  ========  =========

2002 Distribution to Investors                                                                 (12,000)

Net Loss                                                                                          (863)
                                                                                              ---------

Members' Equity PCM, LLC
  at March 31, 2002                                                                           $  7,015
                                                                                              =========
</TABLE>


Performance  Asset  Management  Fund  III, Ltd. and Performance Asset Management
Fund  IV,  Ltd.,  were reporting entities under the Securities Act of 1934. PAM,
PAMII,  PAMV,  and  PCM  INC were not reporting entities. It has been determined
that Performance Capital Management, LLC is a "successor company" under rule 12g
3  of  the  Securities  Act  of  1934, and therefore is subject to the reporting
requirements of the Securities Act of 1934. PCM LLC's LLC units are not publicly
traded  securities.  The  Reorganization Plan placed certain restrictions on the
transfer  of  members'  interests.


NOTE 2 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Reporting Entity
----------------

The Company is a successor entity of six companies emerging from bankruptcy (see
Note  1).  The  accompanying  balance  sheet, statements of operations, members'
equity,  and cash flows includes balances and transactions beginning February 4,
2002  through  March  31,  2002.


                                        8
<PAGE>
                       PERFORMANCE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC

                        NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                        (See Accountants' Review Report)
                        --------------------------------


NOTE 2 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION (CONTINUED)

Comparative Statements
----------------------

Management has elected not to present the accompanying financial statements on a
comparative  basis  because  several  entities  shared  operating  expenses  and
professional  fees  during  the duration of bankruptcy proceedings that were not
included in the final bankruptcy plan.  Further, current management did not take
control  of  the  operations  until  the  Reorganization  Plan  was confirmed on
February  4,  2002.  Current  management  is  not  capable  of  arriving  at the
estimates  for  many of the assertions contained in the financial statements for
prior  periods.  The  cost and effort to reconstruct these financial statements,
if  such  reconstruction  is  even  possible,  would  outweigh  any benefit that
investors  may  derive.  The estimates necessary to prepare prior year financial
statements  for  the  successor  entity  would be so significant that management
believes a comparative presentation would be misleading.  Prior period financial
information  is  available in the bankruptcy filings with Central District Court
of  California  Case  No.  SA  98-27040-RA.

Fresh  Start  Accounting
------------------------

Statement  of Position 90-7 issued by the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants  ("SOP  90-7")  addresses accounting for companies in reorganization
under the bankruptcy code.  For certain entities, SOP 90-7 requires "fresh start
accounting"  which  records  a  revaluation  of  assets  to  fair  values and an
adjustment  of  liabilities  to  present  values.

SOP  90-7  also  requires the following procedures for entities that adopt fresh
start  accounting:

1.   The  reorganization value of the entity should be allocated to the entity's
     assets  following  FAS  141;
2.   Liabilities other than deferred taxes should be stated at present values of
     amounts  to  be  paid  using  current  interest  rates;
3.   Deferred  taxes  should  be presented in conformity with generally accepted
     accounting principles. Benefits realized from preconfirmation net operating
     loss  carryforwards should reduce reorganization value in excess of amounts
     allocable  to identifiable assets and other intangibles until exhausted and
     be  reported  as  a  direct  addition  to  paid-in  capital  thereafter;
4.   Changes  in  accounting  principles  that will be required for the emerging
     entity  within  the  twelve  months  following  the adoption of fresh start
     accounting  should be adopted at the same time fresh starting accounting is
     adopted.

SOP  90-7  also  requires  the  following  disclosure  in  the initial financial
statements  after  fresh  start  accounting  has  been  adopted:

1.   Adjustments to the historical amounts of individual assets and liabilities;
2.   The amount of debt forgiveness;
3.   The amount of prior retained earnings or deficit eliminated; and
4.   Other important matters in determining reorganization value.

Management  reviewed  these  requirements  and  determined  that  fresh  start
accounting  was  not  applicable  because  assets  exceeded liabilities prior to
confirmation  of  the  plan  and  existing  limited partners retained a majority
interest  in  the  successor  entity.

For  entities  that do not meet the requirements for fresh start accounting, SOP
90-7  requires  that  liabilities  compromised by a confirmed bankruptcy plan be
stated  at  present  value  of amounts to be paid, using current interest rates.
Debt  forgiveness,  if  any,  should  be  reported  as  an  extraordinary  item.

As  part  of  the  Reorganization  Plan,  no  debt  forgiveness  existed and all
liabilities  subject to compromise are presented on the face of the accompanying
balance  sheet  as  pre-petition  claims  with  disclosures required by SOP 90-7
presented  in  Note  9.


                                        9
<PAGE>
                       PERFORMANCE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC

                        NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                        (See Accountants' Review Report)
                        --------------------------------


NOTE  2  -  BASIS  OF  PRESENTATION  (CONTINUED)

Transfer  of  Assets  to  Successor  Company
--------------------------------------------

Assets  were  transferred  at  historical  carrying  values  and  postpetition
liabilities  were  assumed  as  required  by  the  bankruptcy confirmation plan.


NOTE  3  -  SUMMARY  OF  SIGNIFICANT  ACCOUNTING  POLICIES

Use  of  Estimates
------------------

In  preparing  financial  statements  in  conformity  with accounting principles
generally  accepted  in  the United States of America, management is required to
make  estimates  and  assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities,  the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the  financial  statements  and  the  reported  amounts of revenues and expenses
during  the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Significant  estimates  have  been made by management with respect to the timing
and  amount  of  collection of future cash flows from non-performing credit card
loan  portfolios.  Among  other  things,  the estimated future cash flows of the
portfolios  are  used  to recognize impairment in the purchased loan portfolios.
Management  reviews  the  estimate  of  future  collections and it is reasonably
possible  that  these  estimates  may  change  based on actual results and other
factors.   A  change  could  be  material  to  the  financial  statements.

Purchased  Loan  Portfolios
---------------------------

Purchased  loan  portfolios  consisted  primarily  of non-performing credit card
accounts.  For  substantially  all  of the Company's acquired portfolios, future
cash flows cannot be reasonably estimated in order to record an accretable yield
consistently.  Therefore,  the  Company  utilizes  the  cost  recovery method as
required  by AICPA Practice Bulletin 6.  Application of the cost recovery method
requires  that any amounts received be applied first against the recorded amount
of  the  portfolios;  when  that amount has been reduced to zero, any additional
amounts  received  are  recognized  as  net  revenue.  Acquired  portfolios  are
initially  recorded  at  there  respective  costs,  and  no  accretable yield is
recorded  on  the  accompanying  balance  sheet.

The Company provides a valuation allowance for acquired loan portfolios when the
present value of expected future cash flows do not exceed the carrying values of
the  portfolios.

Over the life of the portfolio, the Company's management continues to review the
carrying  values  of each loan for impairment.  If net estimated cash flows fall
below  the  carrying  value of the related portfolio, the valuation allowance is
adjusted  accordingly.  Adjustments  to  the valuation allowance are recorded in
the  results  of  operations  as  a  provision  for  losses  on loan portfolios.

Cash  and  Cash  Equivalents
----------------------------

PCM LLC defines cash equivalents as cash, money market investments and overnight
deposits  with  original maturities of less than three months.  Cash equivalents
are  valued  at  cost,  which  approximates  market.  The Company maintains cash
balances  at  one  bank  in  amounts  which exceeded federally insured limits by
approximately  $6.7  million  as  of  March  31,  2002.  The  Company  has  not
experienced  any losses in such accounts.  Management believes it is not exposed
to  any  significant  risks  on  cash  in  bank  accounts.


                                       10
<PAGE>
                       PERFORMANCE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC

                        NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                        (See Accountants' Review Report)
                        --------------------------------


NOTE 3 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Property  and  Equipment
------------------------

Property and equipment are carried at cost and depreciation is computed over the
estimated  useful  lives  of the assets ranging from 3 to 7 years.  PCM LLC uses
the  straight-line  method  of depreciation.  Property and equipment transferred
under  the reorganization plan were transferred at net book value.  Depreciation
is  computed  on  the  remaining  useful  life  at  the  time  of  transfer.

The  related  cost  and  accumulated depreciation of assets retired or otherwise
disposed  of  are  removed  from  the accounts and the resultant gain or loss is
reflected  in  earnings.  Maintenance  and  repairs are expensed currently while
major  betterments  are  capitalized.

Long-term  assets  of PCM LLC are reviewed annually as to whether their carrying
value  has  become  impaired.  Management considers assets to be impaired if the
carrying  value exceeds the future projected cash flows from related operations.
Management  also  re-evaluates  the periods of amortization to determine whether
subsequent  events  and circumstances warrant revised estimates of useful lives.
As  of  March 31, 2002, management expects these assets to be fully recoverable.

Revenue  Recognition
--------------------

Revenue  is  accounted  for  using  the  cost  recovery  method of accounting in
accordance  with  Practice Bulletin No. 6, "Amortization of Discounts on Certain
Acquired  Loans".  Under  the  cost  recovery  method  of  accounting,  all cash
receipts relating to individual loan portfolios are applied first to recover the
cost  of  the  portfolios,  prior  to recognizing any revenue.  Cash receipts in
excess  of cost of purchased loan portfolios are then recognized as net revenue.

Loan portfolio sales occur after the initial portfolio analysis is performed and
the loan portfolio is acquired.  Portfolios sold typically do not meet PCM LLC's
targeted collection characteristics or are located in geographic areas where PCM
LLC is not licensed to collect.  Loan portfolios sold are valued at the lower of
cost  or  market.

Proceeds  from  strategic  sales  of  purchased  loan portfolios are recorded as
revenue  when  received.

Income  Taxes
-------------

PCM LLC is treated as a partnership for Federal income tax purposes and does not
incur  Federal  income  taxes.  Instead, its earnings and losses are included in
the  personal  returns  of  its  members.

PCM  LLC  is  also  treated as a partnership for state income tax purposes.  The
State  of  California  imposes  an  annual  corporation filing fee and an annual
limited  liability  company  fee.


NOTE 4 - RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

During June of 2001, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No.  141,  "Business  Combinations"  ("FAS  141")  and  Statement  of  Financial
Accounting  Standards  No.  142,  "Goodwill  and  Other Intangible Assets" ("FAS
142").

FAS  141  requires  use  of  the  purchase method of accounting for all business
combinations initiated after June 30, 2001, provides specific guidance on how to
identify  the  accounting  acquirer in a business combination, provides specific
criteria  for  recognizing  intangible  assets  apart from goodwill and requires
additional financial statement disclosures regarding business combinations.  FAS
141  will  impact  the  Company's  accounting  for  any  business


                                       11
<PAGE>
                       PERFORMANCE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC

                        NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                        (See Accountants' Review Report)
                        --------------------------------


NOTE 4 - RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS (CONTINUED)

combinations  it  may  enter into in the future. However, FAS 141's adoption did
not  have  an  impact  on  the  Company's  financial  condition  or  results  of
operations.

FAS  142 addresses the accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets after
their  initial  recognition.  FAS  142  changes  the accounting for goodwill and
other  intangible assets by replacing periodic amortization of the asset with an
annual  test  of impairment of goodwill at either the reporting segment level or
one  level  below,  providing  for  similar  accounting treatment for intangible
assets  deemed  to  have  an  indefinite  life. Assets with finite lives will be
amortized  over  their  useful  lives.  FAS  142  also  provides  for additional
financial  statement  disclosures about goodwill and intangible assets.  FAS 142
will  impact the Company's accounting for any business combinations it may enter
into  in the future.   However, FAS 142's adoption did not have an impact on the
Company's  financial  condition  or  results  of  operations.

In  June  2001,  the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
143,  "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations" ("FAS 143"). FAS 143 changes
the  recorded  amount  of  liabilities  associated  with  asset  retirements and
requires the accretion of interest expense over the remaining life of the asset.
FAS  143  also  requires  additional  disclosure  regarding  asset  retirement
obligations.  This  Statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after June
15,  2002.  The  adoption  of  this  statement  will  not  have an impact on the
Company's  financial  condition  or  results  of  operations.

In  August 2001, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
144,  "Accounting  for  the  Impairment  or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets" ("FAS
144").  FAS  144  retains the existing requirements to recognize and measure the
impairment  of  long-lived  assets  to  be held and used or to be disposed of by
sale. However, FAS 144 changes the scope and certain measurement requirements of
existing  accounting guidance. FAS 144 also changes the requirements relating to
reporting  the  effects  of  a  disposal  or  discontinuation  of a segment of a
business.  This Statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after December
15,  2001.  The  adoption of this statement did not have a significant impact on
the  financial  condition  or  results  of  operations  of  the  Company.

In  April  2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
145  "Rescission of Statements No. 4, 14 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No.
13 and Technical Corrections." ("FAS 145").  This Statement rescinds SFAS No. 4,
"Reporting  Gains  and  Losses from Extinguishment of Debt," and an amendment of
that  Statement,  SFAS  No.  64,  "Extinguishments  of  Debt  Made  to  Satisfy
Sinking-Fund  Requirements."  This  Statement  also  rescinds  SFAS  No.  44,
"Accounting  for  Intangible  Assets  of Motor Carriers."  This Statement amends
SFAS No. 13, "Accounting for Leases," to eliminate any inconsistency between the
required  accounting for sale-leaseback transactions and the required accounting
for  certain  lease modifications that have economic effects that are similar to
sale-leaseback  transactions.  FAS  145 also amends other existing authoritative
pronouncements  to  make  various  technical  corrections,  clarify meanings, or
describe  their  applicability  under  changed  conditions.  This  Statement  is
effective  for  fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002.  The adoption of this
statement  is  not  expected  to  have  a  significant  impact  on the financial
condition  or  results  of  operations  of  the  Company.

In  June  2002,  the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
146,  "Accounting  for  Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities."  The
standard  requires companies to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal
activities  when  they  are incurred rather than at the date of commitment to an
exit  or  disposal plan. Examples of costs covered by the standard include lease
termination  costs and certain employee severance costs that are associated with
restructuring, discontinued operations, plant closing, or other exit or disposal
activity.  Previous  accounting  guidance  was  provided by EITF Issue No. 94-3,
"Liability  Recognition  for  Certain  Costs,  Employee Termination Benefits and
Other  Costs  to  Exit  an  Activity  (including  Certain  Costs  Incurred  in a
Restructuring)."  SFAS  No.  146  replaces  EITF  94-3  and  is  to  be  applied
prospectively  to exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002.
The Company will comply with this pronouncement beginning in 2003.  The adoption
of  this statement is not expected to have a significant impact on the financial
condition  or  results  of  operations  of  the  Company.


                                       12
<PAGE>
                       PERFORMANCE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC

                        NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                        (See Accountants' Review Report)
                        --------------------------------


NOTE 5 - FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The  estimated  fair  value and the methods and assumptions used to estimate the
fair values of the financial instruments of the Company as of March 31, 2002 are
as  follows.  The  carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash
and  liabilities  approximate  the fair value.  The fair value of purchased loan
portfolios  was  determined based on both market pricing and discounted expected
cash flows.  The discount rate is based on an acceptable rate of return adjusted
for  the  risk  inherent  in the loan portfolios.  The discount rate utilized at
March  31,  2002  was  20%.  The  estimated  fair  value  of loan portfolios was
$12,000,000  at  March  31,  2002.


NOTE 6 - PURCHASED LOAN PORTFOLIOS

The Company acquires portfolios of non-performing credit card loans from federal
and  state  banks  and other sources.  These loans are acquired at a substantial
discount  from  the  actual  outstanding  balance.  The  aggregate  outstanding
contractual  loan balances at March 31, 2002 totaled approximately $1.3 billion.

The  Company  initially  records acquired loans at cost.  To the extent that the
cost  of  a  particular  loan  portfolio  exceeds  the estimated amount of money
expected  to  be collected, a valuation allowance is recognized in the amount of
such  impairment.

The carrying amount of loans included in the accompanying balance sheet at March
31,  2002  is  as  follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                               <C>
Unrecovered cost balance,
  beginning of period             $    10,236,158
Valuation allowance,
  beginning of period                  (5,472,952)
                                  ----------------
Net balance, beginning of period        4,763,206
Net portfolio activity                   (199,537)
                                  ----------------
Net balance, end of period        $     4,563,669
                                  ================
</TABLE>

The activity in the loan portfolios in the accompanying financial statements for
the  period  ended  March  31,  2002  is  as  follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                <C>
Purchased loan portfolios          $             700,050
Collections on loan portfolios                (1,210,119)
Sales of loan portfolios                         (60,843)
Revenue recognized on collections                349,352
Revenue recognized on sales                       22,023
                                   ----------------------
Net portfolio activity                          (199,537)
                                   ======================
</TABLE>

The  valuation  allowance related to the loan portfolios at March 31, 2002 is as
follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                       <C>

Valuation allowance, beginning of period  $     5,472,952
Change in valuation allowance                           -
                                          ---------------
Valuation allowance, end of period        $     5,472,952
                                          ===============
</TABLE>


NOTE  7  -  OTHER  RECEIVABLES

Other  receivables consist of monies due to the Company from PCM INC and the PAM
Funds  as  of  March  31,  2002.


                                       13
<PAGE>
                       PERFORMANCE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC

                        NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                        (See Accountants' Review Report)
                        --------------------------------


NOTE  8  -  PROPERTY  AND  EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment at March 31, 2002 is as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                             <C>
Office furniture and equipment  $245,088
Computer equipment               456,616
Leasehold improvements            36,982
                                --------
  Totals                         738,686
Less accumulated depreciation     34,387
                                --------
  Property and equipment, net   $704,299
                                ========
</TABLE>

Depreciation expense for the period ended March 31, 2002 amounted to $34,387.


NOTE  9  -  PRE-PETITION  CLAIMS

Under  the  Reorganization  Plan,  PCM  LLC  is  required to pay certain allowed
pre-petition  claims  and professional fees totaling to approximately $1,400,000
of  which  $881,880  remains outstanding as of March 31, 2002.  These claims are
summarized  as  follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                               <C>
Accounting fees                   $             31,584
Collection expense                              29,530
Improvements                                   176,310
Legal fees                                      31,722
Mailing expense                                 24,524
Office supplies                                  7,258
Other                                           72,366
Portfolio settlement                            37,620
Public relations                                76,986
Rent and real estate commissions                82,680
Reserve for claims                             200,000
Telephone                                        9,854
Wages and other labor                          101,446
                                  --------------------
   Total                          $            881,880
                                  ====================
</TABLE>

NOTE 10 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Lease  Commitments
------------------

The  Company  currently  leases  office  space  in  Anaheim,  California under a
non-cancelable  five  year  operating lease.  Under the lease agreement, PCM LLC
must  pay  a basic monthly rental charge plus a portion of the building's common
area  expenses.

Prior  to  the Company moving to its current location, the Company leased office
space  in  Irvine, California under a non-cancelable operating lease expiring on
April  30,  2002.


                                       14
<PAGE>
                       PERFORMANCE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC

                        NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                        (See Accountants' Review Report)
                        --------------------------------


NOTE 10 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (CONTINUED)

Lease  Commitments  (continued)
-------------------------------

Future minimum lease commitments as of March 31, 2002 are as follows:

       Year ending
        March 31,
        ---------
           2003                    $ 311,000
           2004                      299,000
           2005                      307,000
           2006                      316,000
           2007                      214,000
     Thereafter                            -

Rental expense for the period ended March 31, 2002 was $95,069.

Consent Decree - Fair Credit Reporting Act
------------------------------------------

In  February  2001, a Consent Decree was entered in United States District Court
in  an  action  United States of America v. Performance Capital Management, Inc.
(One  of  the entities that formed Performance Capital Management, LLC, see Note
1).  Under  the  terms  of  the  Consent  Decree,  PCM,  INC had a civil penalty
pursuant to Section 621 (a) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. 1681s(a)
of  $2,000,000  waived.  The  Consent  Decree  basically  had  PCM  INC  and its
successors agree to follow the provisions of the Fair Credit Reporting Act.  The
Consent  Decree ordered, among other specifics, that PCM INC and its successors,
officers,  employees,  et  al,  are:  1.)enjoined from failing to report correct
delinquency  dates to consumer reporting agencies;  2.) enjoined from failing to
properly  investigate  consumer  disputes  and  verify,  correct  or  delete the
reporting of such information to consumer reporting agencies within the time set
forth  in  the  Fair Credit Reporting Act;   3.) enjoined from failing to report
accounts  as  "disputed"  to  consumer reporting agencies when consumers dispute
accounts either in writing, orally, or by electronic means; and 4) enjoined from
failing  to  comply  in  any  other  respect with the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

The  Consent Decree provides for a period of three years access to the business,
all computerized databases, right to inspect and copy all relevant documents and
the  right  to  interview  officers  and  employees.

Contingencies
-------------

PCM  LLC is involved in various legal actions primarily arising from PCM INC and
the  partnerships Chapter 11 filing.  Many of these issues have been resolved by
settlement  agreements.  PCM LLC management has actively resolved these actions.
At February 4, 2002, a provision was established of $200,000.  At March 31, 2002
the  balance  remaining  of  this provision is $200,000 which is included in the
pre-petition  claims  on  the  accompanying  balance  sheet.


NOTE 11 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Claim
-----

In December 2002, a bankruptcy claim totaling approximately $170,000 was brought
to  the  attention  of the Company.  This claim was not on the final claims list
filed  with  the  court.  PCM  LLC's Management does not believe that this claim
will  be  found  to be valid by the court and has not accrued for it as of March
31,  2002.  Management  does not believe the ultimate outcome of this claim will
have  a  material  adverse  affect  on  the  Company's  financial  position.


                                       15
<PAGE>
                       PERFORMANCE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC

                        NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                        (See Accountants' Review Report)
                        --------------------------------


NOTE 11 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (CONTINUED)

Purchase  Commitment
--------------------

In December 2002, the Company entered into an agreement that commits the Company
to  purchase  loan  portfolios.  The  initial  term of the agreement is 6 months
(December  2002 - May 2003) and the Company has the right to extend the term for
an  additional  6  months if it expresses the desire to do so by April 15, 2003.
Under  the  terms  of  the agreement the Company will pay 5% of the "Approximate
Current  Balance",  as  defined  in  the  agreement.  The  "Approximate  Current
Balances"  purchased in December 2002 and January, February, and March 2003 were
approximately  $2,274,000,  $2,326,000, $1,151,100, and $1,395,100 respectively.
The  amounts  paid  for  these  purchases  were  $113,689, $116,297, $57,555 and
$69,756.  Under  the  terms  of  the agreement, the commitment for April and May
2003  will be approximately $3.0 million in "Approximate Current Balances", at a
cost  of  approximately  $150,000.


                                       16
<PAGE>
ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS

Except  for  the  historical information presented in this document, the matters
discussed  in this Form 10-QSB, and specifically in "Management's Discussion and
Analysis  of  Financial  Condition  and  Results  of  Operations,"  or otherwise
incorporated  by  reference  into  this  document  contain  "forward  looking
statements" (as such term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act  of  1995). These statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking
terminology  such  as  "believes," "plans," "expects," "may," "will," "intends,"
"should,"  or  "anticipates" or the negative thereof or other variations thereon
or  comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy that involve risks and
uncertainties.  The  safe  harbor  provisions  of  Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933,
as  amended,  apply  to  forward-looking  statements made by Performance Capital
Management,  LLC.  You  should  not  place  undue  reliance  on  forward-looking
statements.  Forward-looking  statements  involve  risks  and uncertainties. The
actual  results  that  we achieve may differ materially from any forward-looking
statements due to such risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements
are  based  on  current expectations, and we assume no obligation to update this
information.  Readers  are  urged  to  carefully review and consider the various
disclosures  made  by  us in this report on Form 10-QSB and in our other reports
filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  that  attempt to advise
interested  parties  of  the  risks  and  factors  that may affect our business.

The  following  discussion  and  analysis of our financial condition and plan of
operation  should be read in conjunction with the unaudited financial statements
and  accompanying  notes and the other financial information appearing elsewhere
in  this  report  and  with  the financial information contained in our Form 8-K
filed  on  April  2,  2003.

OVERVIEW

We  acquire  assets  originated  by  federal  and  state  banking  and  savings
institutions,  loan  agencies,  and other sources, for the purpose of generating
income  and  cash flow from collecting or selling those assets. Typically, these
assets  consist of charged-off credit card contracts, but we have also purchased
other  forms  of  indebtedness,  including automobile deficiencies and defaulted
judgments.  These  assets  are  typically  purchased  and  sold  as  portfolios.

Before  purchasing  a portfolio, we conduct due diligence to assess the value of
the  portfolio.  We  try to purchase portfolios at a substantial discount to the
actual amount of money that they will ultimately produce, so that we can recover
the  cost  we  pay for the portfolio, pay our collection and operating costs and
still  have  a  profit.  We  record our portfolios at cost based on the purchase
price.  We  reduce  the cost bases of our portfolios on a portfolio-by-portfolio
basis based on collections, sales of some or all of the portfolio and impairment
of  net  realizable  value.

We  frequently sell certain portions of portfolios we purchase, such as accounts
from  particular states where we do not collect, and then collect the balance of
the  portfolio.  We do not generally purchase loan portfolios solely with a view
to  their resale, and for this reason we generally do not show portfolios on our
balance  sheet  as  "held for investment". From time to time we sell some of our
portfolios  either to capitalize on market conditions, to dispose of a portfolio
that  is not performing or to dispose of a portfolio whose collection life, from
our  perspective, has run its course. When we engage in these sales, we continue
collecting  the  portfolio  right  up  until  the  closing  of  the  sale.

We  refer  to the discounted present value of the actual amount of money that we
believe  a  portfolio  will  ultimately  produce  as  the  "fair  value"  of the
portfolio.  If we conduct our business successfully, the aggregate fair value of
our  portfolios should be substantially greater than the aggregate cost basis of
our  portfolios  presented  on  our  balance  sheet. We must make assumptions to
determine fair value, the most significant of which are the magnitude and timing
of  future  collections  and  the discount rate used to determine present value.
Because  of  the  inherent uncertainty associated with predicting future events,
our  determinations  of  fair  value  at  any  particular point in time are only
estimates,  and  actual  fair value could ultimately vary significantly from our
estimate.

We  earn revenues from collecting our portfolios and from selling our portfolios
or  portions  of  our  portfolios. We recognize gross revenue when we collect an
account and when we sell a portfolio or a portion of it. On our income statement
we  reduce  our  gross  revenues by the cost basis recovery of our portfolios to
arrive  at  net  revenue.  For  collections,  we  reduce  the  cost basis of the
portfolio dollar-for-dollar until we have completely recovered the cost basis of
the  portfolio.  When  we  sell a portfolio or a portion of it, to the extent of
remaining  cost  basis  for  the  portfolio,  we  reduce  the  cost basis of the
portfolio  by  a  percentage  of  the  original  portfolio  cost.


                                       17
<PAGE>
Our  net  revenues  from  portfolio collections may vary from quarter to quarter
because  the  number  and  magnitude of portfolios where we are still recovering
costs  may  vary, and because the return rates of portfolios whose costs we have
already  recovered  in full may vary. Similarly, our net revenues from portfolio
sales  may vary from quarter to quarter depending on the number and magnitude of
portfolios  (or  portions)  we  decide to sell and the market values of the sold
portfolios  (or  portions)  relative  to  their  cost  bases.

Our  operating  costs  and expenses consist principally of salaries and benefits
and  general  and  administrative  expenses.  Fluctuations  in  our salaries and
benefits  correspond  roughly  to fluctuations in our headcount. Our general and
administrative  expenses  include non-salaried collection costs, telephone, rent
and  professional  expenses.  Fluctuations  in  telephone  and  collection costs
generally  correspond  to  the  volume of accounts we are attempting to collect.
Professional  expenses  tend  to  vary based on specific issues we must resolve.

BASIS  OF  PRESENTATION

We present our financial statements based on our emergence from bankruptcy being
treated  as  the inception of our business. In our emergence from bankruptcy, we
succeeded to the assets and liabilities of six entities that were in bankruptcy.
The  equity  owners of these entities approved a reorganization plan under which
the  owners  of  these  six  entities  agreed  to receive ownership interests in
Performance  Capital  Management, LLC, in exchange for their ownership interests
in  the  predecessor  entities.  As  discussed  in  more detail in Note 2 to our
financial  statements,  we  do not present comparative financial information for
the  predecessor  entities  in  bankruptcy  because  we  believe  it  would  be
prohibitively  expensive,  if  not  impossible,  to  reconstruct  accurate
accrual-based  consolidated financial information for the six entities that were
in bankruptcy, and any financial statements developed for prior bankrupt periods
would  not  provide  meaningful  information  sufficient  to  justify  the cost.

CRITICAL  ACCOUNTING  ESTIMATES

We  present investments in portfolios on our balance sheet at the lower of cost,
market,  or  estimated  net  realizable value. As discussed above, we reduce the
cost basis of a portfolio on a proportionate basis when we sell a portion of the
portfolio,  and  we treat amounts collected on a portfolio as a reduction to the
carrying  basis  of  the  portfolio  on  an  individual portfolio basis. When we
present financial statements we assess the estimated net realizable value of our
portfolios  on  a  portfolio-by-portfolio  basis, and we reduce the value of any
portfolio  that  has  suffered  impairment  because  its  cost basis exceeds its
estimated  net  realizable  value.  Estimated  net  realizable  value represents
management's  estimates,  based  upon  present  plans  and  intentions,  of  the
discounted  present  value  of  future  collections. We must make assumptions to
determine  estimated net realizable value, the most significant of which are the
magnitude  and  timing  of  future  collections  and  the  discount rate used to
determine  present  value.  Once we write down a particular portfolio, we do not
increase it in subsequent periods if our plans and intentions or our assumptions
change.

We  present  the fair value of our portfolios only in the notes to our financial
statements,  not  in  the  basic  financial  statements  themselves. In order to
understand  our  financial  statements  the  reader must understand the concepts
involved  in estimation of the fair value of our portfolios, as discussed in the
section  above  entitled  "Overview".  Because  of  the  inherent  uncertainty
associated  with  predicting  future events, our determinations of fair value at
any  particular  point  in  time are only estimates, and actual fair value could
ultimately  vary  significantly  from  our  estimate.

When  we  collect  an  account  in  a portfolio, we reduce the cost basis of the
portfolio dollar-for-dollar until we have completely recovered the cost basis of
the  portfolio. We believe this method of accounting for the amortization of the
purchase  price  of  our  portfolios is conservative and minimizes the effect of
estimation  on  our  results  of  operations.  This  policy  has  the  effect of
"front-loading"  expenses,  however,  and  may  result  in a portfolio initially
showing  no  net  revenue for a period of time and then showing only net revenue
once  we  have  recovered its entire cost basis. Although this accounting policy
may  be  criticized  for  not  matching  portfolio  cost  basis  to revenue on a
proportionate basis over the life of the portfolio, we believe a policy grounded
in  conservatism  is  preferable  to  a  policy  of  attempting  to estimate the
appropriate  matching percentages, due to the distressed nature of the portfolio
assets and the lack of assurance that projected collections will actually occur.


                                       18
<PAGE>
When  we  sell  a  portfolio or a portion of it, to the extent of remaining cost
basis  for  the  portfolio,  we  reduce  the  cost  basis  of the portfolio by a
percentage of the original portfolio cost. Our policy does not take into account
whether the portion of the portfolio we are selling may be more or less valuable
than  the remaining accounts that comprise the portfolio. We believe our policy,
which  is  grounded  in  this  objective  measure  for  cost  basis recovery, is
preferable  to  a  policy  that would attempt to estimate whether a portion of a
portfolio  being  sold is more or less valuable than the remaining accounts that
comprise the portfolio, because our policy minimizes the effect of estimation on
our  results  of  operations.

OPERATING RESULTS

For  the period from February 4, 2002 (inception) to March 31, 2002, we incurred
a net loss of approximately $863,000. We had negative cash flows from operations
of  approximately  $585,000.

Revenue
-------

We  reported  gross  revenues in the amount of approximately $1.3 million during
the  period  from  February  4, 2002 (inception) to March 31, 2002. After taking
into  account  the  aggregate cost basis recovery of the portfolios we collected
and  sold,  we  reported  net  revenues  in  the  amount of $371,000. We derived
approximately  $349,000  of  our net revenues from approximately $1.2 million of
portfolio  collections.  We  expect our portfolio collections to increase in the
coming  year  because  we acquired a substantial amount of new portfolios toward
the  end  of  2002. We expect these increased collections to result in increased
net  revenues,  but  we cannot predict the magnitude of this increase because we
cannot  precisely  predict the mix of our collections between our old portfolios
(which  generally  have  smaller  cost  basis  recovery,  if  any)  and  our new
portfolios  (which  "front-load" their cost basis recovery).  As a general rule,
it  takes about one year for us to recover the cost basis of a new portfolio, so
we  do  not  expect  new  portfolios  acquired  in  late  2002  to  begin making
significant contributions to net revenues until the third and fourth quarters of
2003.  We  derived  approximately  $22,000  of  our  net  revenues from sales of
portfolios.

Operating  Expenses
-------------------

Our  general  and  administration  expenses  were approximately $384,000 for the
period  from  February  4,  2002 (inception) to March 31, 2002. Our salaries and
benefits  expenses  during  that  same  period  were approximately $798,000. Our
operating  expenses  may  increase  somewhat in 2003, but at this time we do not
expect  these  increases  to  be  substantial.

LIQUIDITY  AND  CAPITAL  RESOURCES

At  March  31,  2002,  we  had  approximately  $2.9  million  of  cash  and cash
equivalents. During the period ended March 31, 2002, we used approximately $12.0
million  for  a  distribution  to  our  members,  approximately $1.2 million for
operating  and  other  activities  and  approximately  $700,000  to purchase new
portfolios.  We  funded  these uses of cash principally through our opening cash
balance  of  approximately  $15.5 million at February 4, 2002, and approximately
$1.3  million  of  proceeds  from  collecting  and  selling  portfolios.

During  the  period  ended March 31, 2002, we did not achieve results consistent
with  our  business plan: to recover the cost we pay for our portfolios, pay our
collecting  and  operating  costs and still have a profit.  Our cost recovery of
approximately  $900,000  plus  our operating and other expenses of approximately
$1.2 million exceeded our collections and sales of approximately $1.3 million by
approximately  $863,000.  On  a  cash  basis,  our new portfolio acquisitions of
approximately  $700,000 plus our cash operating and other costs of approximately
$1.2 million exceeded our collections and sales of approximately $1.3 million by
approximately  $585,000.  This  $585,000  cash  deficit  was  funded  by  the
approximately  $3.5  million  of opening cash we had (after allowing for the $12
million  used  to  pay  a  distribution).  During  the  latter  part of 2002, we
invested  heavily  in the acquisition of new portfolios.  We spent this money to
acquire  new  portfolios  because  we  believe  it is important to our long-term
success  to  constantly  reinvest  in  new  portfolios.

By  the end of 2002, we believe we achieved a better balance between new and old
portfolios  than  we had on emergence from bankruptcy.  In addition, we have put
in  place  procedures to ensure that our collectors continue to focus collection
efforts  on  older  portfolios  that  still  have  returns to yield, rather than
focusing just on the most recently acquired portfolios.  With these improvements
in  our  portfolio balance and with our new procedures in place, we believe that
in 2003 we will achieve results consistent with our business plan, at least on a
cash  basis.


                                       19
<PAGE>
Our  portfolios  provide our principal source of liquidity. Over time, we expect
to  convert  our portfolios to cash in an amount that equals or exceeds the cost
basis  of  our portfolios. In addition, some portfolios whose cost bases we have
completely  recovered will continue to return collections to us. Our estimate of
the  fair  value  of our portfolios at March 31, 2002, did not change from $12.0
million at February 4, 2002.  At the same time, the cost basis of our portfolios
decreased  to  approximately  $4.6 million at March 31, 2002, from approximately
$4.8  million  at  February  4,  2002.

We used a discount rate of 20% to determine the fair values of our portfolios at
March 31, 2002, and February 4, 2002. The following table sets forth alternative
estimates  of  fair  value  if  we  assessed  collection risk as higher (using a
discount  rate  of  25%)  or  lower  (using  a  discount  rate  of  15%).

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                             March 31, 2002   February 4, 2002
                                             ---------------  -----------------
<S>                                          <C>              <C>
Higher collection risk (25% discount rate)   $  11.2 million  $    11.2 million
Assumed collection risk (20% discount rate)  $  12.0 million  $    12.0 million
Lower collection risk (15% discount rate)    $  12.8 million  $    12.8 million
</TABLE>

Our  estimates of fair values also would change if we revised our projections of
the  magnitude  and  timing  of  future  collections.  Because  of  the inherent
uncertainty associated with predicting future events, our determinations of fair
value  at any particular point in time are only estimates, and actual fair value
could  ultimately  vary  significantly  from  our  estimate.

We plan to realize the difference between fair value and cost basis over time as
we  collect  our portfolios. We generally collect our portfolios over periods of
time  ranging  from  three  to seven years, with the bulk of a portfolio's yield
coming  in  the first three years we collect it. If we succeed in collecting our
portfolios  and  realize the difference between fair value and cost basis of our
portfolios,  we  will  recover the cost we paid for them, pay our collection and
operating  costs,  and  still  have excess cash. In the near term we plan to use
some  of  our  cash  collections  representing  cost  basis  recovery  to  make
distributions  to  our  members  and  interest  holders.  Ultimately  we plan to
generate excess cash and use some of it to make distributions to our members and
interest  holders. We anticipate making our first distribution (not counting the
initial  $12  million distribution made shortly after emergence from bankruptcy)
during  the  second  quarter  of 2003, based on cash collected through March 31,
2003.

In  the  near  term,  we  plan to reinvest some of our opening cash and our cash
collections representing cost basis recovery to acquire additional portfolios to
continue growing the fair value of our portfolios on a quarter to quarter basis.
Ultimately we plan to reinvest all of the cash representing cost basis recovery,
plus a portion of excess cash, to acquire additional portfolios.

Our Board of Directors has described this strategy as having two parts:

  -  Provide an annuity without impairing the value of the business; and

  -  Grow the business to increase the annuity.

Due  to  factors  such  as  the  availability  of new portfolios, market pricing
conditions for new portfolios and the timing of distributions to our members, we
may  not  achieve  increases  in  fair  value  each  quarter.

In  general,  we  expect  increases  in  portfolio  fair  value  to  result in a
corresponding  increase  in  the  cost  basis of our portfolios presented on our
balance  sheet.  The  magnitude  and  timing of our collections could cause cost
basis  to  decline in some quarters when fair value actually increases, however,
because  we  "front-load"  our cost basis recovery instead of matching portfolio
cost  basis  recovery  to  revenue on a proportionate basis over the life of the
portfolio.  Our purchasing patterns could reinforce this divergence.  A decrease
in the magnitude of new portfolio acquisitions (i.e., failing to reinvest all of
cash  collections  representing  cost basis recovery) may still result in a fair
value  increase  because new portfolios generally have a fair value that exceeds
their  purchase  price.


                                       20
<PAGE>
We  do  not  have any lines of credit or other debt financing available to us at
this  time.  We do not have any plans to raise equity capital. Based on our cash
position  and  current  financial  resources, and assuming our operating results
continue  to  increase  at projected levels, we believe we have adequate capital
resources  to  continue  our business as presently conducted for the foreseeable
future.

We  do not have any contractual commitments to make capital expenditures, and we
have not budgeted any capital expenditures for the coming year. We may from time
to  time  acquire  capital  assets  on  an as needed basis. Our most significant
capital  assets  are  our  dialer  and  our  telephone  switch,  which we do not
anticipate  having  to  replace  within  the  next  year.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

We continue to assess the effects of recently issued accounting standards. The
impact of all recently adopted and issued accounting standards has been
disclosed in the footnotes to our unaudited Financial Statements, Note 4.

                           PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In  February  2001,  a  Consent Decree was entered in the United States District
Court  for  the Central District of California in an action involving the United
States of America v. Performance Capital Management, Inc. Under the terms of the
Consent  Decree,  Performance  Capital  Management,  Inc.  had  a  civil penalty
pursuant  to  Section  621(a)  of  the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. Sec.
1681s(a)  of  $2,000,000  waived.  The  Consent Decree basically had Performance
Capital  Management,  Inc.  and its successors agree to follow the provisions of
the  Fair  Credit  Reporting  Act.  The  Consent  Decree  ordered,  among  other
specifics,  that  Performance  Capital  Management,  Inc.  and  its  successors,
officers,  employees,  et  al,  are  (a) enjoined from failing to report correct
delinquency  dates  to consumer reporting agencies, (b) enjoined from failing to
properly  investigate  consumer  disputes  and  verify,  correct  or  delete the
reporting of such information to consumer reporting agencies within the time set
forth  in  the  Fair  Credit  Reporting Act, (c) enjoined from failing to report
accounts  as  "disputed"  to  consumer reporting agencies when consumers dispute
accounts  either  in  writing,  orally, or by electronic means, and (d) enjoined
from  failing to comply in any other respect with the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

The  Consent Decree provides that for a period of three years, the Federal Trade
Commission  has  access  to our business, all of our computerized databases, the
right to inspect and copy all relevant documents, and the right to interview our
officers  and  employees.

Except  as  described  above,  to  the  knowledge  of our executive officers and
directors,  neither we nor our subsidiaries are party to any legal proceeding or
litigation and none of our property is the subject of a pending legal proceeding
and  our  executive  officers  and  directors  know  of  no  other threatened or
contemplated  legal  proceedings  or  litigation.

ITEM 2.  CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Set forth below is information regarding the issuance and sale of our securities
without  registration  from February 4, 2002 (inception) through March 31, 2002.

Under  the  Plan  of  Reorganization approved by the Bankruptcy Court, we issued
571,550  LLC  Units to the PAM Funds, which were then distributed to the limited
partners  of  the  PAM Funds during February 2003, all pursuant to the exemption
provided  by Section 1145 of the Bankruptcy Code. We issued the LLC Units to the
PAM  Funds based on the gross dollars (approximately $57.4 million) the partners
had  invested  in  the  respective  PAM  Funds.

ITEM 4.  SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

In  October and November 2001, a vote was solicited from creditors and investors
of  the  PAM Funds and Performance Capital Management, Inc. who were eligible to
vote  on  the  Joint  Chapter  11  Plan  of  Reorganization  (the  "Plan  of
Reorganization") as proposed by the Trustee and the Official Committee of Equity
Security  Holders  and later confirmed by the United States Bankruptcy Court for
the  Central  District  of  California,  Santa  Ana  Division. The creditors and
investors  eligible  to  vote were asked to vote to accept or reject the Plan of
Reorganization.


                                       21
<PAGE>
For  purposes  of  confirming the vote to accept the Plan of Reorganization, the
Declaration  of  Catherine  M.  Castaldi,  counsel  to the Official Committee of
Equity  Security  Holders, was filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court. The results
of  the  vote  by  entity  in  the  Declaration  were  disclosed  as  follows:

Performance  Asset  Management  Fund,  Ltd.  (Class  10)
  -  Of the 125 equity security holders who voted, only one voted to reject the
     Plan, all others accepted the Plan. The rejecting party held only one unit.
     Thus Class 10 voted in favor of the Plan.
  -  There were three non-votes. These votes were not counted.

Performance  Asset  Management  Fund  II,  Ltd.  (Class  11)
  -  Of the 150 equity security holders who voted, only two voted to reject the
     Plan, all others accepted the Plan. The rejecting parties held an aggregate
     of five units. Thus Class 11 voted in favor of the Plan.
  -  There were eight non-votes. These votes were not counted.

Performance  Asset  Management  Fund  III,  Ltd.  (Class  12)
  -  Of the 225 equity security holders who voted, only three voted to reject
     the Plan, all others accepted the Plan. The rejecting parties held an
     aggregate of eight units. Thus Class 13 voted in favor of the Plan.
  -  There were 15 non-votes. These votes were not counted.

Performance  Asset  Management  Fund  IV,  Ltd.  (Class  13)
  -  Of the 514 equity security holders who voted, only seven voted to reject
     the Plan, all others accepted the Plan. The rejecting parties held an
     aggregate of 134 units. Thus Class 13 voted in favor of the Plan.
  -  There were 27 non-votes. These votes were not counted.

Performance  Asset  Management  Fund  V,  Ltd.  (Class  11)
  -  Of the 126 equity security holders who voted, all voted to accept the Plan.
     Thus Class 14 voted in favor of the Plan.
  -  There were 5 non-votes. These votes were not counted.

Ballots  were  disqualified  if either: (a) the voting party failed to check the
box with respect to acceptance or rejection; or (b) the voting party turned in a
ballot  where  the  party  was  neither  listed on the Schedules for the subject
debtor,  nor  had  filed  a  proof  of claim or interest for the subject debtor.
Eighty  parties  submitted  ballots where they held neither a claim nor interest
against  a  subject  debtor,  and  those  ballots  were  not  counted.


No  matters  were  submitted to the creditors or our investors during the period
from  inception,  February  4,  2002,  to  December  31,  2002.

ITEM 5.  OTHER EVENTS

During  the period ended March 31, 2002, pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization,
we  made  a  distribution  of  $12.0  million  to  our  Members.

ITEM 6.  EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a)  EXHIBITS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER   DESCRIPTION
-------  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<C>      <S>
   2.1*  Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization Proposed by Chapter 11 Trustee and the Official
         Committee of Equity Security Holders effective February 4, 2002

   2.2*  First Amended Disclosure Statement Describing Joint Chapter 11 Plan Proposed by Chapter 11
         Trustee and the Official Committee of Equity Security Holders approved on October 12, 2001

   3.1*  Performance Capital Management, LLC Articles of Organization

   3.2*  Operating Agreement for Performance Capital Management, LLC

   3.3*  First Amendment to Operating Agreement for Performance Capital Management, LLC

   4.1*  Specimen Performance Capital Management, LLC Unit Certificate

   4.2*  Specimen Performance Capital Management, LLC Economic Interest Unit Certificate

   4.3*  Provisions in the Operating Agreement for Performance Capital Management, LLC pertaining to
         the rights of LLC Unit holders (see Exhibit 3.2 and 3.3)

   10.1  Lease Agreement

   99.1  Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

   99.2  Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
</TABLE>

*  Filed on April 2, 2003 as an exhibit to Performance Capital Management, LLC's
report  on Form 8-K dated February 4, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference.


(b)  REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

No  reports  on  Form  8-K  were  filed  during the period from February 4, 2002
(inception)  to  March  31,  2002.


                                       22
<PAGE>
                                   SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.

                                          PERFORMANCE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC


   April 24, 2003                    By:  /s/ David J. Caldwell
--------------------                    ------------------------------------
       (Date)                             Name: David J. Caldwell
                                           Its: Chief Operations Officer



                                       23
<PAGE>
                                 CERTIFICATIONS


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, David J. Caldwell, certify that:

1.  I  have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Performance Capital
Management,  LLC;

2.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the  statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were  made,  not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other financial
information  included  in  this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects  the  financial  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods presented in this quarterly report;



Date:  April 24, 2003                        /s/  David J. Caldwell
      -----------------                    --------------------------------
                                           David J. Caldwell
                                           Chief Operations Officer



                                       24
<PAGE>
                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Edward M. Rucker, certify that:

1.  I  have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Performance Capital
Management,  LLC;

2.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the  statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were  made,  not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other financial
information  included  in  this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects  the  financial  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods presented in this quarterly report;



Date:  April 24, 2003                        /s/  Edward M. Rucker
      -----------------                    --------------------------------
                                           Edward M. Rucker
                                           Accounting Manager



                                       25
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            EXHIBIT INDEX


EXHIBIT
NUMBER   DESCRIPTION
-------  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<C>      <S>
   2.1*  Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization Proposed by Chapter 11 Trustee and the Official
         Committee of Equity Security Holders effective February 4, 2002

   2.2*  First Amended Disclosure Statement Describing Joint Chapter 11 Plan Proposed by Chapter 11
         Trustee and the Official Committee of Equity Security Holders approved on October 12, 2001

   3.1*  Performance Capital Management, LLC Articles of Organization

   3.2*  Operating Agreement for Performance Capital Management, LLC

   3.3*  First Amendment to Operating Agreement for Performance Capital Management, LLC

   4.1*  Specimen Performance Capital Management, LLC Unit Certificate

   4.2*  Specimen Performance Capital Management, LLC Economic Interest Unit Certificate

   4.3*  Provisions in the Operating Agreement for Performance Capital Management, LLC pertaining to
         the rights of LLC Unit holders (see Exhibit 3.2 and 3.3)

   10.1  Lease Agreement

   99.1  Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

   99.2  Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
</TABLE>

*  Filed on April 2, 2003 as an exhibit to Performance Capital Management, LLC's
report  on Form 8-K dated February 4, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference.


<PAGE>