HEARING 12/3/2014

www.midwestlitigation.com Phone: 1.800.280.3376 Fax: 314.644.1334

MIDWEST LITIGATION SERVICES

Page 1

1 VEOLIA PUBLIC HEARING

2 UNITED STATES EPA PROPOSAL

3 OF AN OPERATING PERMIT RENEWAL

4 FOR THE VEOLIA ES TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC

5 SAUGET, ILLINOIS

6

7 DECEMBER 3, 2014

8

9

10

11

12

13

14 HEARING OFFICER: Ms. Genevieve Damico

15 ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER: Mr. David Ogulei

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25
 HEARING 12/3/2014

www.midwestlitigation.com Phone: 1.800.280.3376 Fax: 314.644.1334

MIDWEST LITIGATION SERVICES

Page 2

1 INDEX

2 PAGE

3 Opening comments by Ms. Damico 6

4 Opening comments by Mr. Ogulei 9

5 Comments by Ms. Alana Siegel 16

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25
 HEARING 12/3/2014

www.midwestlitigation.com Phone: 1.800.280.3376 Fax: 314.644.1334

MIDWEST LITIGATION SERVICES

Page 3

1 VEOLIA PUBLIC HEARING

2 UNITED STATES EPA PROPOSAL

3 OF AN OPERATING PERMIT RENEWAL

4 FOR THE VEOLIA ES TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC

5 SAUGET, ILLINOIS

6

7 DECEMBER 3, 2014

8

9 HEARING OFFICER: Ms. Genevieve Damico

10 ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER: Mr. David Ogulei

11

12

13 The following Public Hearing was held

14 at the offices of East St. Louis Higher Education,

15 601 James R. Thompson Boulevard, Building D, Room

16 2002, East St. Louis, Illinois 62201, on Wednesday,

17 December 3, 2014, between the hours of 3:01 o'clock

18 in afternoon and 7:00 o'clock in the afternoon,

19 before Kathleen Watson Brunsmann, a Certified Court

20 Reporter (MO), Certified Shorthand Reporter (IL),

21 Registered Professional Reporter, Certified Realtime

22 Reporter and the following was made of record

23 to-wit:

24

25
 HEARING 12/3/2014

www.midwestlitigation.com Phone: 1.800.280.3376 Fax: 314.644.1334

MIDWEST LITIGATION SERVICES

Page 4

1 A P P E A R A N C E S

2

3 For the U.S. Environmental Protection

4 Agency, Region 5:

5

6 Mr. David Ogulei

7 Environmental Engineer;

8 Ms. Genevieve Damico

9 Chief of Air Permits Section;

10 Ms. Andrea Morgan

11 Environmental Engineer

12 77 West Jackson Boulevard, AR-18J

13 Chicago, Illinois 60604-3590

14 312.353.0987

15

16 Present on Behalf of Veolia ES Technical

17 Solutions, LLC:

18

19 Mr. Joseph Kellmeyer

20 Thompson Coburn

21 505 North 7th Street, Suite 2600

22 St. Louis, Missouri 63101

23 314.552.6000

24

25
 HEARING 12/3/2014

www.midwestlitigation.com Phone: 1.800.280.3376 Fax: 314.644.1334

MIDWEST LITIGATION SERVICES

Page 5

1 Kathleen Watson Brunsmann, RPR/CRR

2 Missouri CCR #1376

3 Illinois CSR #084-001317

4 Midwest Litigation Services

5 711 North Eleventh Street

6 St. Louis, Missouri 63101

7 (314) 644-2191

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25
 HEARING 12/3/2014

www.midwestlitigation.com Phone: 1.800.280.3376 Fax: 314.644.1334

MIDWEST LITIGATION SERVICES

Page 6

1 ****************

2 MS. DAMICO: Okay. Good afternoon,

3 everybody. Let the record reflect that it is 3:01

4 on December 3rd, 2014. This hearing is on US EPA's

5 proposal of an operating permit renewal for the

6 Veolia Environmental Services Technical Solutions

7 LLC located in Sauget, Illinois. This hearing is

8 being held in Room 2002 in Building D of the

9 Southern Illinois University Edwardsville East St.

10 Louis Higher Education Campus, 601 James R. Thompson

11 Boulevard in East St. Louis, Illinois.

12 Legal notice of the hearing was

13 published in the Belleville News Democrat newspaper

14 on October 16th and the East St. Louis Monitor

15 newspaper on October 23rd, 2014. The permit

16 documents are publicly available at

17 www.regulations.gov, docket ID:

18 EPA-R05-OAR-2014-0280, and information about the

19 hearing was placed on US EPA's website.

20 My name is Genevieve Damico, the Chief

21 of the Air Permit Section with the US Environmental

22 Protection Agency, Region 5. I will be serving as

23 the Hearing Officer for today's hearing. A court

24 reporter is making the transcript of everything that

25 is said here today, and that transcript will become
 HEARING 12/3/2014

www.midwestlitigation.com Phone: 1.800.280.3376 Fax: 314.644.1334

MIDWEST LITIGATION SERVICES

Page 7

1 part of US EPA's official administrative record on

2 this facility.

3 David Ogulei and Andrea Morgan,

4 Environmental Engineers, are also here today

5 representing the US EPA. Everyone is from the

6 Chicago, Illinois office of US EPA.

7 We are here today to listen to your

8 comments regarding the US EPA's draft operating

9 renewal permit that US EPA is proposing to issue to

10 Veolia ES Technical Solutions LLC located in Sauget,

11 Illinois.

12 Today's hearing will have two parts.

13 In the first part, David Ogulei will provide an

14 overview of the draft permit. Second, we will take

15 public questions for the record. However, we will

16 not respond to questions or comments today.

17 All persons wishing to speak during

18 this hearing should let us know by filling out a

19 blue index card with your name. When your name is

20 called, please state your name, then spell your name

21 for the court reporter. If you have written

22 comments but do not wish to speak, please give them

23 to me before you leave.

24 So that everyone who wishes to comment

25 has a chance to do so, please limit your comments to
 HEARING 12/3/2014

www.midwestlitigation.com Phone: 1.800.280.3376 Fax: 314.644.1334

MIDWEST LITIGATION SERVICES

Page 8

1 four minutes. At the three and a half minute mark,

2 I will ask you to conclude within 30 seconds. If

3 you have not finished at that time, I will ask you

4 to release the floor to the next commenter. After

5 everyone has gotten a chance to comment, if time is

6 still available before the close of the hearing, you

7 may return and finish your comments. Alternatively,

8 you may submit your remaining comments to me on

9 paper today or through the comment process until the

10 end of the public comment period.

11 Please remember to repeat your last

12 name and spell it for the court reporter.

13 We will not be holding any -- an

14 informal question and answer session as part of this

15 hearing. Any testimony received at this hearing,

16 along with any written comments received by the end

17 of the comment period will be part of the official

18 record for this permit.

19 The US EPA has prepared a fact sheet

20 which is available here today. The fact sheet and

21 other documents in the record for this permitting

22 action provide details about the permit, and also

23 explain how you may file written comments. You can

24 find the record for this permit action at

25 www.regulations.gov, docket ID:
 HEARING 12/3/2014

www.midwestlitigation.com Phone: 1.800.280.3376 Fax: 314.644.1334

MIDWEST LITIGATION SERVICES

Page 9

1 EPA-R05-OAR-2014-0280.

2 In addition to any oral arguments you

3 provide today, you may also submit written comments

4 on the draft permit through December 19th. US EPA

5 will add any comments that we receive by the close

6 of business on December 19th to the permitting

7 record.

8 David Ogulei from the US EPA will give

9 us an overview of the permit. Following the

10 overview, I will call names of those who registered

11 to speak today in the order that they registered.

12 When I call your name, please come up to the front

13 of the room, state your name and address, spell your

14 last name, and identify any company or organization

15 you're representing.

16 MR. OGULEI: Good afternoon. My name

17 is David Ogulei, and I am an environmental engineer

18 at the Chicago office of the US EPA.

19 Veolia ES Technical Solution's Sauget,

20 Illinois facility, or simply Veolia, is a treatment,

21 storage and disposal facility, which accepts waste

22 for disposal through incineration. Veolia receives

23 containers and bulk shipments of hazardous solid,

24 liquid and gaseous wastes; analyzes and transfers

25 the waste to temporary storage facilities; and
 HEARING 12/3/2014

www.midwestlitigation.com Phone: 1.800.280.3376 Fax: 314.644.1334

MIDWEST LITIGATION SERVICES

Page 10

1 processes and incinerates it in three incinerators.

2 The waste that Veolia receives varies, and can

3 contain differing amounts of hazardous materials.

4 The Clean Air Act requires an operating

5 permit -- known as a Title V permit -- for

6 facilities that emit or have the capacity to emit

7 large amounts of air pollution, and for certain

8 types of facilities that must comply with specific

9 federal standards. Veolia is required to get a

10 Title V permit because it is a major source of

11 hazardous air pollutant emissions and is subject to

12 one of the National Emission Standards for Hazardous

13 Air Pollutants, or NESHAPs. This permit details the

14 amount of pollution the facility can emit and what

15 it must do to control the pollution. A Title V

16 permit is valid for five years and may be renewed in

17 five year increments.

18 As I will describe in more detail in a

19 few minutes, EPA is proposing to renew the Title V

20 operating permit for Veolia and here is the legal

21 background on that.

22 EPA issued a Title V permit to Veolia

23 on September 12, 2008 and the permit became

24 effective on October 12, 2008. Prior to issuing the

25 permit, EPA reviewed historical metal feedrate data
 HEARING 12/3/2014

www.midwestlitigation.com Phone: 1.800.280.3376 Fax: 314.644.1334

MIDWEST LITIGATION SERVICES

Page 11

1 supplied by Veolia. The term "feedrate" describes

2 the amount of waste that Veolia burns in its

3 incinerators. Feedrate limits set the amount -- the

4 maximum amount of specific types of waste -- here,

5 heavy metals, such as mercury, lead, cadmium,

6 arsenic, chromium and beryllium -- that Veolia can

7 feed into its incinerators per hour. EPA concluded

8 that the data provided by Veolia prior to issuance

9 of the 2008 permit was not reliable for determining

10 feedrate limits, (also called operating parameter

11 limits, or OPLs), for heavy metals.

12 Because EPA found the data unreliable,

13 EPA issued Veolia's permit without including

14 feedrate limits for mercury, lead, cadmium, arsenic,

15 chromium or beryllium. However, as required by the

16 federal regulations governing hazardous waste

17 incinerators, EPA included in the permit a

18 compliance schedule that required Veolia to test all

19 three incinerators to develop feedrate limits for

20 emissions of mercury, low-volatile metals (that is

21 arsenic, chromium, and beryllium) and semi-volatile

22 metals (that is lead and cadmium).

23 Veolia conducted the required

24 comprehensive performance tests in August and

25 September of 2008. EPA reviewed the results, and in
 HEARING 12/3/2014

www.midwestlitigation.com Phone: 1.800.280.3376 Fax: 314.644.1334

MIDWEST LITIGATION SERVICES

Page 12

1 January of 2013, EPA began a process to revise the

2 2008 permit. EPA later chose to simply incorporate

3 the proposed changes into Veolia's permit renewal

4 that is the subject of today's public hearing.

5 So what is EPA proposing? EPA is

6 proposing to make changes to and renew the existing

7 Title V operating permit for Veolia. The proposed

8 permit contains all the emissions limitations and

9 standards to which Veolia is subject and will ensure

10 that there's enough monitoring and recordkeeping

11 required to verify that the source is in compliance

12 with permit requirements.

13 EPA is proposing to add the feedrate

14 limits for mercury, semi-volatile, and low volatile

15 metals that were omitted from the Veolia's 2008

16 permit and to update other operating parameter

17 limits as required by federal regulations for

18 hazardous waste incinerators. The feedrate limits

19 that we are proposing to add to the permit were

20 established using the results of Veolia's October

21 2013 comprehensive performance tests, and Veolia is

22 already required to comply with the limits under the

23 NESHAP for hazardous waste incinerators. To ensure

24 compliance with these metal feedrate limits, EPA is

25 also proposing to improve Veolia's feedsteam
 HEARING 12/3/2014

www.midwestlitigation.com Phone: 1.800.280.3376 Fax: 314.644.1334

MIDWEST LITIGATION SERVICES

Page 13

1 analysis procedures. The additional analysis

2 procedures proposed by EPA would supplement analysis

3 requirements for mercury, semi-volatile metals and

4 low volatile metals, as specified in Veolia's

5 feedstream analysis plan, known as a FAP, and would

6 supercede any less stringent provisions in the FAP.

7 Incorporation of the additional

8 feedstream analysis procedures into the Title V

9 permit would not eliminate Veolia's obligation to

10 maintain an adequate FAP, consistent with federal

11 regulations for hazardous waste incinerators.

12 Additionally, EPA is proposing to

13 require Veolia to temporarily install and operate a

14 continuous emissions monitoring system for metals,

15 or multi-metals CEMS, on each of its three

16 incinerators. Veolia will operate the CEMSs as

17 parametric monitoring systems to assess whether the

18 operating parameter limits for specific metals are

19 adequate to ensure compliance with federal rules.

20 As parametric monitoring systems, the CEMSs will

21 verify the adequacy of the feedrate limits. The

22 CEMSs will test the air emitted during incineration

23 to determine that the amount of mercury,

24 semi-volatile metals, low volatile metals, and other

25 metals emitted, and will report results
 HEARING 12/3/2014

www.midwestlitigation.com Phone: 1.800.280.3376 Fax: 314.644.1334

MIDWEST LITIGATION SERVICES

Page 14

1 approximately once every 15 minutes.

2 The test results will help the EPA and

3 Veolia ensure the feedrate limits in the permit are

4 adequate to protect air quality and to ensure

5 compliance with the NESHAP for hazardous waste

6 incinerators. EPA is proposing to require the

7 Veolia to operate the CEMSs for no less than 12

8 consecutive months or until EPA has enough

9 information to determine if the proposed feedrate

10 limits are adequate to ensure Veolia complies with

11 the Clean Air Act.

12 Once EPA has collected sufficient

13 information, EPA will no longer require Veolia to

14 use multi-metal CEMSs.

15 EPA is also proposing to remove some

16 requirements that no longer apply. For example, an

17 emission limit previously included in the permit to

18 meet federal standards for the boiler is no longer

19 applicable because EPA has promulgated new federal

20 standards that apply to the boiler. EPA, therefore,

21 would replace that emissions limit with the new

22 federal standards for boilers.

23 As Ms. Damico noted, we will not answer

24 any questions or respond to any comments today.

25 However, after the close of the comment period, we
 HEARING 12/3/2014

www.midwestlitigation.com Phone: 1.800.280.3376 Fax: 314.644.1334

MIDWEST LITIGATION SERVICES

Page 15

1 will respond in writing to each written oral --

2 written or oral comment filed today, and any

3 comments submitted before the close of the public

4 comment period. Our responses will be contained in

5 a response to comments document that we will

6 distribute to each person who files comments or

7 requests to receive a copy of the final permit.

8 Thank you.

9 MS. DAMICO: Okay. Well, it appears at

10 this time that we do not have anybody interested in

11 testifying, so we are going to take a 30 minute

12 break, at which time we will revisit if any other

13 speakers have arrived and would like to speak at the

14 hearing.

15 Okay, thank you.

16 (Recess.)

17 MS. DAMICO: All right. Any speakers

18 at this time?

19 (No response.)

20 MS. DAMICO: Okay. We will take

21 another 30 minute break and see if anybody would

22 like to speak at that time.

23 (Recess.)

24 MS. DAMICO: Okay. It's been a half

25 hour, and at this time I do not think we have any
 HEARING 12/3/2014

www.midwestlitigation.com Phone: 1.800.280.3376 Fax: 314.644.1334

MIDWEST LITIGATION SERVICES

Page 16

1 speakers available, so we will take another half

2 hour break.

3 (Recess.)

4 MS. DAMICO: Okay. Do we have any

5 speakers?

6 (No response.)

7 MS. DAMICO: So another half hour

8 passed, we have no interested speakers at this time,

9 so we'll take another half an hour.

10 (Recess.)

11 MS. DAMICO: Did anybody want us to

12 reread any of our opening remarks?

13 (No response.)

14 MS. DAMICO: We're good? All right.

15 So it is now 5:10 and I do believe at

16 this point we do have a couple of people who are

17 interested in testifying, so I will welcome our

18 first speaker up. State and spell your name for the

19 court reporter.

20 MS. SIEGEL: Alana Siegel, A-L-A-N-A,

21 S-I-E-G-E-L.

22 MR. WANG: My name is Terry Wang,

23 T-E-R-R-Y, W-A-N-G.

24 MS. SIEGEL: Good afternoon. My name

25 is Alana Siegel and this is Terry Wang, and we are
 HEARING 12/3/2014

www.midwestlitigation.com Phone: 1.800.280.3376 Fax: 314.644.1334

MIDWEST LITIGATION SERVICES

Page 17

1 both students in the Interdisciplinary Environmental

2 Legal Clinic at Washington University in St. Louis.

3 At the clinic, we work on a team that represents

4 Kathy Andria and The American Bottom Conservancy

5 (ABC), a non-profit environmental justice and

6 advocacy group located in the Metro-East region.

7 As you may be aware, Veolia's Sauget

8 facility is located in an environmentally

9 overburdened community. The community is subjected

10 to hazardous air emissions from Veolia and many

11 other industrial facilities in the vicinity. This

12 fact makes it especially important that EPA

13 seriously consider the implications of Veolia's

14 hazardous air emissions as a contributory part to a

15 much larger whole.

16 Generally, ABC is pleased with the

17 changes EPA has proposed to Veolia's permit because

18 they will help protect the community from Veolia's

19 hazardous air emissions:

20 Most significantly, ABC supports EPA in

21 its decision requiring Veolia to install and operate

22 a multi-metals Continuous Emissions Monitoring

23 System. EPA's requirement that the CEMS be used as

24 a Continuous Parameter [sic] Monitoring System is

25 necessary and justified. Veolia's most recent
 HEARING 12/3/2014

www.midwestlitigation.com Phone: 1.800.280.3376 Fax: 314.644.1334

MIDWEST LITIGATION SERVICES

Page 18

1 Comprehensive Performance Test showed an

2 unexplainable variability in mercury and low and

3 semi-volatile metal emissions between incinerators 2

4 and 3. Although these incinerators are nearly

5 identical, when fed hazardous materials at the same

6 rate and in the same quantity they emit a

7 significantly different amount. This variability

8 casts doubt on the ability of a feedrate to

9 accurately correlate with rate of emissions. The

10 CEMS used as CPMS will help ensure that the new

11 feedrate limits for hazardous metals are compliant

12 with national emission standards, thereby protecting

13 human health and the environment. We hope that

14 after 12 consecutive months of using the CEMS as a

15 CPMS, Veolia will come to appreciate its utility and

16 petition to continue using it for compliance

17 monitoring.

18 ABC is pleased that EPA has finally

19 incorporated feedrate limits for mercury, low and

20 semi-volatile metals based on the most recent

21 Comprehensive Performance Test. Veolia has

22 unfortunately been operating without these limits

23 since the last permit was issued in 2008. The test

24 has the incinerators operating at the most

25 controlled settings they will likely ever operate.
 HEARING 12/3/2014

www.midwestlitigation.com Phone: 1.800.280.3376 Fax: 314.644.1334

MIDWEST LITIGATION SERVICES

Page 19

1 During the test, the burners are intentionally

2 spiked to show what the emissions of hazardous

3 metals are when fed in a pure and known

4 concentration. Because of the emissions of mercury,

5 low and semi-volatile metals are the most hazardous

6 to human health and the environment, it is important

7 to ABC that there are accurate feedrate limits for

8 the metals.

9 Lastly, ABC is happy that EPA will

10 require Veolia to perform enhanced feedstream

11 analysis for mercury and low and semi-volatile

12 metals. Currently, Veolia only tests about ten

13 percent of the waste fed into its incinerators.

14 Instead, it relies on broad profiles generated by

15 waste-generating companies. Considering the

16 variability in emissions from Veolia's incinerators,

17 sampling just ten percent of the waste feed is not

18 adequate to accurately characterize the waste that

19 it burns. Veolia will now be required to test

20 everything it feeds into the incinerators for

21 mercury and low and semi-volatile metals, which ABC

22 feels it should have been doing all along.

23 In addition to these improvements, ABC

24 would like to see EPA require that Veolia install

25 and operate an activated carbon injection system on
 HEARING 12/3/2014

www.midwestlitigation.com Phone: 1.800.280.3376 Fax: 314.644.1334

MIDWEST LITIGATION SERVICES

Page 20

1 both units 2 and 3. Our written comment will

2 discuss this in greater detail, but ABC feels that

3 having activated carbon injection systems will help

4 mitigate the variability in mercury emissions from

5 these identical units, as evidenced by the most

6 recent Comprehensive Performance Test. Carbon

7 injection will help ensure compliance with mercury

8 emission limits despite this variability, as it

9 significantly reduces mercury emissions.

10 Lastly, ABC has concerns about some

11 provisions in the renewal permit that are unclear.

12 We will discuss these in greater detail in our

13 written comment.

14 Overall, ABC would like to see the

15 permit be implemented with the current changes

16 intact: The Permit should require the use of a CEMS

17 as a CPMS for 12 months, enhanced feedstream

18 analysis procedures for mercury and low and

19 semi-volatile metals, and feedrate limits for these

20 metals as determined by the 2014 CPT results.

21 Thank you for consideration of our

22 comments.

23 MS. DAMICO: Thank you. All right.

24 Thank you very much.

25 Do we have anybody else that is
 HEARING 12/3/2014

www.midwestlitigation.com Phone: 1.800.280.3376 Fax: 314.644.1334

MIDWEST LITIGATION SERVICES

Page 21

1 interested in speaking at this time?

2 (No response.)

3 MS. DAMICO: Okay. We will be in

4 another half hour break.

5 Thank you.

6 (Recess.)

7 MS. DAMICO: All right. I think our

8 half hour is up. I assume we still have no takers

9 for speaking. Anyone?

10 (No response.)

11 MS. DAMICO: All right. So we will

12 break for another half hour because we have no

13 speakers at the moment.

14 Thank you.

15 (Recess.)

16 MS. DAMICO: Okay. Another half hour

17 has passed. No speakers. Okay, so we'll have the

18 record show that nobody is interested in speaking

19 and we'll take another half hour.

20 (Recess.)

21 MS. DAMICO: All right. We have 15

22 minutes left, and still nobody interested in

23 speaking, so we'll be closing shop down in 15

24 minutes.

25 (Recess.)
 HEARING 12/3/2014

www.midwestlitigation.com Phone: 1.800.280.3376 Fax: 314.644.1334

MIDWEST LITIGATION SERVICES

Page 22

1 MS. DAMICO: Okay. We're back on the

2 record. This concludes our hearing tonight.

3 Remember, if you did not give oral or written

4 comments tonight, the comment period ends on

5 December 19th. Thank you for coming.

6 Let the record show it is now 7:00 on

7 December 3rd, 2014, and the hearing for Veolia ES

8 Technical Solutions LLC Draft Operating Permit is

9 now closed.

10 (Hearing adjourned.)

11 (WHEREIN, the hearing was concluded at

12 7:00 PM.)

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25
 HEARING 12/3/2014

www.midwestlitigation.com Phone: 1.800.280.3376 Fax: 314.644.1334

MIDWEST LITIGATION SERVICES

Page 23

1 CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER

2

3 I, Kathleen Watson Brunsmann, a

4 Certified Court Reporter (MO), Certified Shorthand

5 Reporter (IL), Registered Professional Reporter, and

6 a Certified Realtime Reporter, do hereby certify

7 that the witness whose testimony appears in the

8 foregoing deposition was duly sworn by me pursuant

9 to 5 ILCS 255/2 (from Ch. 101, par.2); that the

10 testimony of said witness was taken by me to the

11 best of my ability and thereafter reduced to

12 typewriting under my direction; that I am neither

13 counsel for, related to, nor employed by any of the

14 parties to the action in which this deposition was

15 taken, and further that I am not a relative or

16 employee of any attorney or counsel employed by the

17 parties thereto, nor financially or otherwise

18 interested in the outcome of the action.

19

20

21 ___________________________________

22 Certified Shorthand Reporter

23 within and for the State of Illinois

24

25
 HEARING 12/3/2014

www.midwestlitigation.com Phone: 1.800.280.3376 Fax: 314.644.1334

MIDWEST LITIGATION SERVICES

A

ABC 17:5,16,20

18:18 19:7,9,21

19:23 20:2,10

20:14

ability 18:8

23:11

accepts 9:21

accurate 19:7

accurately 18:9

19:18

Act 10:4 14:11

action 8:22,24

23:14,18

activated 19:25

20:3

add 9:5 12:13,19

addition 9:2

19:23

additional 13:1,7

Additionally

13:12

address 9:13

adequacy 13:21

adequate 13:10

13:19 14:4,10

19:18

adjourned 22:10

administrative

7:1

advocacy 17:6

afternoon 3:18

3:18 6:2 9:16

16:24

Agency 4:4 6:22

air 4:9 6:21 10:4

10:7,11,13

13:22 14:4,11

17:10,14,19

Alana 2:5 16:20

16:25

Alternatively 8:7

American 17:4

amount 10:14

11:2,3,4 13:23

18:7

amounts 10:3,7

analysis 13:1,1,2

13:5,8 19:11

20:18

analyzes 9:24

Andrea 4:10 7:3

Andria 17:4

answer 8:14

14:23

anybody 15:10

15:21 16:11

20:25

appears 15:9

23:7

applicable 14:19

apply 14:16,20

appreciate 18:15

approximately

14:1

arguments 9:2

arrived 15:13

arsenic 11:6,14

11:21

AR-18J 4:12

assess 13:17

assume 21:8

attorney 23:16

August 11:24

available 6:16

8:6,20 16:1

aware 17:7

A-L-A-N-A

16:20

B

back 22:1

background

10:21

based 18:20

began 12:1

Behalf 4:16

believe 16:15

Belleville 6:13

beryllium 11:6

11:15,21

best 23:11

blue 7:19

boiler 14:18,20

boilers 14:22

Bottom 17:4

Boulevard 3:15

4:12 6:11

break 15:12,21

16:2 21:4,12

broad 19:14

Brunsmann 3:19

5:1 23:3

Building 3:15 6:8

bulk 9:23

burners 19:1

burns 11:2 19:19

business 9:6

C

C 4:1

cadmium 11:5,14

11:22

call 9:10,12

called 7:20 11:10

Campus 6:10

capacity 10:6

carbon 19:25

20:3,6

card 7:19

casts 18:8

CCR 5:2

CEMS 13:15

17:23 18:10,14

20:16

CEMSs 13:16,20

13:22 14:7,14

certain 10:7

CERTIFICATE

23:1

Certified 3:19,20

3:21 23:4,4,6

23:22

certify 23:6

Ch 23:9

chance 7:25 8:5

changes 12:3,6

17:17 20:15

characterize

19:18

Chicago 4:13 7:6

9:18

Chief 4:9 6:20

chose 12:2

chromium 11:6

11:15,21

Clean 10:4 14:11

clinic 17:2,3

close 8:6 9:5

14:25 15:3

closed 22:9

closing 21:23

Coburn 4:20

collected 14:12

come 9:12 18:15

coming 22:5

comment 7:24

8:5,9,10,17

14:25 15:2,4

20:1,13 22:4

commenter 8:4

comments 2:3,4

2:5 7:8,16,22

7:25 8:7,8,16

8:23 9:3,5

14:24 15:3,5,6

20:22 22:4

community 17:9

17:9,18

companies 19:15

company 9:14

compliance

11:18 12:11,24

13:19 14:5

18:16 20:7

compliant 18:11

complies 14:10

comply 10:8

12:22

comprehensive

11:24 12:21

18:1,21 20:6

concentration

19:4

concerns 20:10

conclude 8:2

concluded 11:7

22:11

concludes 22:2

conducted 11:23

consecutive 14:8

18:14

Conservancy

17:4

consider 17:13

consideration

20:21

Considering

19:15

consistent 13:10

contain 10:3

contained 15:4

containers 9:23

contains 12:8

continue 18:16

continuous 13:14

17:22,24

contributory

17:14

control 10:15

controlled 18:25

copy 15:7

correlate 18:9

counsel 23:13,16

couple 16:16

court 3:19 6:23

7:21 8:12 16:19

23:4

CPMS 18:10,15

20:17

CPT 20:20

CSR 5:3

current 20:15

Currently 19:12

D

D 3:15 6:8

Damico 1:14 2:3

3:9 4:8 6:2,20

14:23 15:9,17

15:20,24 16:4,7

16:11,14 20:23

21:3,7,11,16,21

22:1

data 10:25 11:8
 HEARING 12/3/2014

www.midwestlitigation.com Phone: 1.800.280.3376 Fax: 314.644.1334

MIDWEST LITIGATION SERVICES

11:12

David 1:15 3:10

4:6 7:3,13 9:8

9:17

December 1:7

3:7,17 6:4 9:4,6

22:5,7

decision 17:21

Democrat 6:13

deposition 23:8

23:14

describe 10:18

describes 11:1

despite 20:8

detail 10:18 20:2

20:12

details 8:22

10:13

determine 13:23

14:9

determined

20:20

determining 11:9

develop 11:19

different 18:7

differing 10:3

direction 23:12

discuss 20:2,12

disposal 9:21,22

distribute 15:6

docket 6:17 8:25

document 15:5

documents 6:16

8:21

doing 19:22

doubt 18:8

draft 7:8,14 9:4

22:8

duly 23:8

E

E 4:1,1

East 3:14,16 6:9

6:11,14

Education 3:14

6:10

Edwardsville 6:9

effective 10:24

Eleventh 5:5

eliminate 13:9

emission 10:12

14:17 18:12

20:8

emissions 10:11

11:20 12:8

13:14 14:21

17:10,14,19,22

18:3,9 19:2,4

19:16 20:4,9

emit 10:6,6,14

18:6

emitted 13:22,25

employed 23:13

23:16

employee 23:16

ends 22:4

engineer 1:15

3:10 4:7,11

9:17

Engineers 7:4

enhanced 19:10

20:17

ensure 12:9,23

13:19 14:3,4,10

18:10 20:7

environment

18:13 19:6

environmental

1:15 3:10 4:3,7

4:11 6:6,21 7:4

9:17 17:1,5

environmentally

17:8

EPA 1:2 3:2 7:5

7:6,9 8:19 9:4,8

9:18 10:19,22

10:25 11:7,12

11:13,17,25

12:1,2,5,5,13

12:24 13:2,12

14:2,6,8,12,13

14:15,19,20

17:12,17,20

18:18 19:9,24

EPA's 6:4,19 7:1

7:8 17:23

EPA-R05-OA...

6:18 9:1

ES 1:4 3:4 4:16

7:10 9:19 22:7

especially 17:12

established 12:20

everybody 6:3

evidenced 20:5

example 14:16

existing 12:6

explain 8:23

F

facilities 9:25

10:6,8 17:11

facility 7:2 9:20

9:21 10:14 17:8

fact 8:19,20

17:12

FAP 13:5,6,10

fed 18:5 19:3,13

federal 10:9

11:16 12:17

13:10,19 14:18

14:19,22

feed 11:7 19:17

feedrate 10:25

11:1,3,10,14,19

12:13,18,24

13:21 14:3,9

18:8,11,19 19:7

20:19

feeds 19:20

feedsteam 12:25

feedstream 13:5

13:8 19:10

20:17

feels 19:22 20:2

file 8:23

filed 15:2

files 15:6

filling 7:18

final 15:7

finally 18:18

financially 23:17

find 8:24

finish 8:7

finished 8:3

first 7:13 16:18

five 10:16,17

floor 8:4

following 3:13,22

9:9

foregoing 23:8

found 11:12

four 8:1

front 9:12

further 23:15

G

gaseous 9:24

Generally 17:16

generated 19:14

Genevieve 1:14

3:9 4:8 6:20

give 7:22 9:8

22:3

going 15:11

good 6:2 9:16

16:14,24

gotten 8:5

governing 11:16

greater 20:2,12

group 17:6

H

half 8:1 15:24

16:1,7,9 21:4,8

21:12,16,19

happy 19:9

hazardous 9:23

10:3,11,12

11:16 12:18,23

13:11 14:5

17:10,14,19

18:5,11 19:2,5

health 18:13 19:6

hearing 1:1,14

3:1,9,13 6:4,7

6:12,19,23,23

7:12,18 8:6,15

8:15 12:4 15:14

22:2,7,10,11

heavy 11:5,11

held 3:13 6:8

help 14:2 17:18

18:10 20:3,7

Higher 3:14 6:10

historical 10:25

holding 8:13

hope 18:13

hour 11:7 15:25

16:2,7,9 21:4,8

21:12,16,19

hours 3:17

human 18:13

19:6

I

ID 6:17 8:25

identical 18:5

20:5

identify 9:14

IL 3:20 23:5

ILCS 23:9

Illinois 1:5 3:5,16

4:13 5:3 6:7,9

6:11 7:6,11

9:20 23:23

implemented

20:15

implications

17:13

important 17:12

19:6

improve 12:25

improvements

19:23

incinerates 10:1

incineration 9:22

13:22

incinerators 10:1

11:3,7,17,19

12:18,23 13:11

13:16 14:6 18:3

18:4,24 19:13

19:16,20

included 11:17

14:17
 HEARING 12/3/2014

www.midwestlitigation.com Phone: 1.800.280.3376 Fax: 314.644.1334

MIDWEST LITIGATION SERVICES

including 11:13

incorporate 12:2

incorporated

18:19

Incorporation

13:7

increments 10:17

index 2:1 7:19

industrial 17:11

informal 8:14

information 6:18

14:9,13

injection 19:25

20:3,7

install 13:13

17:21 19:24

intact 20:16

intentionally

19:1

Interdisciplina...

17:1

interested 15:10

16:8,17 21:1,18

21:22 23:18

issuance 11:8

issue 7:9

issued 10:22

11:13 18:23

issuing 10:24

J

Jackson 4:12

James 3:15 6:10

January 12:1

Joseph 4:19

justice 17:5

justified 17:25

K

Kathleen 3:19

5:1 23:3

Kathy 17:4

Kellmeyer 4:19

know 7:18

known 10:5 13:5

19:3

L

large 10:7

larger 17:15

Lastly 19:9 20:10

lead 11:5,14,22

leave 7:23

left 21:22

legal 6:12 10:20

17:2

limit 7:25 14:17

14:21

limitations 12:8

limits 11:3,10,11

11:14,19 12:14

12:17,18,22,24

13:18,21 14:3

14:10 18:11,19

18:22 19:7 20:8

20:19

liquid 9:24

listen 7:7

Litigation 5:4

LLC 1:4 3:4 4:17

6:7 7:10 22:8

located 6:7 7:10

17:6,8

longer 14:13,16

14:18

Louis 3:14,16

4:22 5:6 6:10

6:11,14 17:2

low 12:14 13:4

13:24 18:2,19

19:5,11,21

20:18

low-volatile

11:20

M

maintain 13:10

major 10:10

making 6:24

mark 8:1

materials 10:3

18:5

maximum 11:4

meet 14:18

mercury 11:5,14

11:20 12:14

13:3,23 18:2,19

19:4,11,21 20:4

20:7,9,18

metal 10:25

12:24 18:3

metals 11:5,11

11:20,22 12:15

13:3,4,14,18,24

13:24,25 18:11

18:20 19:3,5,8

19:12,21 20:19

20:20

Metro-East 17:6

Midwest 5:4

minute 8:1 15:11

15:21

minutes 8:1

10:19 14:1

21:22,24

Missouri 4:22

5:2,6

mitigate 20:4

MO 3:20 23:4

moment 21:13

Monitor 6:14

monitoring

12:10 13:14,17

13:20 17:22,24

18:17

months 14:8

18:14 20:17

Morgan 4:10 7:3

multi-metal

14:14

multi-metals

13:15 17:22

N

N 4:1

name 6:20 7:19

7:19,20,20 8:12

9:12,13,14,16

16:18,22,24

names 9:10

national 10:12

18:12

nearly 18:4

necessary 17:25

neither 23:12

NESHAP 12:23

14:5

NESHAPs 10:13

new 14:19,21

18:10

News 6:13

newspaper 6:13

6:15

non-profit 17:5

North 4:21 5:5

noted 14:23

notice 6:12

O

obligation 13:9

October 6:14,15

10:24 12:20

office 7:6 9:18

Officer 1:14 3:9

6:23

offices 3:14

official 7:1 8:17

Ogulei 1:15 2:4

3:10 4:6 7:3,13

9:8,16,17

Okay 6:2 15:9,15

15:20,24 16:4

21:3,16,17 22:1

omitted 12:15

once 14:1,12

opening 2:3,4

16:12

operate 13:13,16

14:7 17:21

18:25 19:25

operating 1:3 3:3

6:5 7:8 10:4,20

11:10 12:7,16

13:18 18:22,24

22:8

OPLs 11:11

oral 9:2 15:1,2

22:3

order 9:11

organization

9:14

outcome 23:18

Overall 20:14

overburdened

17:9

overview 7:14

9:9,10

o'clock 3:17,18

P

P 4:1,1

PAGE 2:2

paper 8:9

parameter 11:10

12:16 13:18

17:24

parametric 13:17

13:20

part 7:1,13 8:14

8:17 17:14

parties 23:14,17

parts 7:12

par.2 23:9

passed 16:8

21:17

people 16:16

percent 19:13,17

perform 19:10

performance

11:24 12:21

18:1,21 20:6

period 8:10,17

14:25 15:4 22:4

permit 1:3 3:3

6:5,15,21 7:9

7:14 8:18,22,24

9:4,9 10:5,5,10

10:13,16,20,22

10:23,25 11:9

11:13,17 12:2,3

12:7,8,12,16,19

13:9 14:3,17

15:7 17:17

18:23 20:11,15

20:16 22:8
 HEARING 12/3/2014

www.midwestlitigation.com Phone: 1.800.280.3376 Fax: 314.644.1334

MIDWEST LITIGATION SERVICES

Permits 4:9

permitting 8:21

9:6

person 15:6

persons 7:17

petition 18:16

placed 6:19

plan 13:5

please 7:20,22,25

8:11 9:12

pleased 17:16

18:18

PM 22:12

point 16:16

pollutant 10:11

Pollutants 10:13

pollution 10:7,14

10:15

prepared 8:19

Present 4:16

previously 14:17

prior 10:24 11:8

procedures 13:1

13:2,8 20:18

process 8:9 12:1

processes 10:1

Professional 3:21

23:5

profiles 19:14

promulgated

14:19

proposal 1:2 3:2

6:5

proposed 12:3,7

13:2 14:9 17:17

proposing 7:9

10:19 12:5,6,13

12:19,25 13:12

14:6,15

protect 14:4

17:18

protecting 18:12

Protection 4:3

6:22

provide 7:13

8:22 9:3

provided 11:8

provisions 13:6

20:11

public 1:1 3:1,13

7:15 8:10 12:4

15:3

publicly 6:16

published 6:13

pure 19:3

pursuant 23:8

Q

quality 14:4

quantity 18:6

question 8:14

questions 7:15

7:16 14:24

R

R 3:15 4:1 6:10

rate 18:6,9

Realtime 3:21

23:6

receive 9:5 15:7

received 8:15,16

receives 9:22

10:2

Recess 15:16,23

16:3,10 21:6,15

21:20,25

record 3:22 6:3

7:1,15 8:18,21

8:24 9:7 21:18

22:2,6

recordkeeping

12:10

reduced 23:11

reduces 20:9

reflect 6:3

regarding 7:8

region 4:4 6:22

17:6

registered 3:21

9:10,11 23:5

regulations

11:16 12:17

13:11

related 23:13

relative 23:15

release 8:4

reliable 11:9

relies 19:14

remaining 8:8

remarks 16:12

remember 8:11

22:3

remove 14:15

renew 10:19 12:6

renewal 1:3 3:3

6:5 7:9 12:3

20:11

renewed 10:16

repeat 8:11

replace 14:21

report 13:25

reporter 3:20,20

3:21,22 6:24

7:21 8:12 16:19

23:1,4,5,5,6,22

representing 7:5

9:15

represents 17:3

requests 15:7

require 13:13

14:6,13 19:10

19:24 20:16

required 10:9

11:15,18,23

12:11,17,22

19:19

requirement

17:23

requirements

12:12 13:3

14:16

requires 10:4

requiring 17:21

reread 16:12

respond 7:16

14:24 15:1

response 15:5,19

16:6,13 21:2,10

responses 15:4

results 11:25

12:20 13:25

14:2 20:20

return 8:7

reviewed 10:25

11:25

revise 12:1

revisit 15:12

right 15:17 16:14

20:23 21:7,11

21:21

room 3:15 6:8

9:13

RPR/CRR 5:1

rules 13:19

S

S 4:1

sampling 19:17

Sauget 1:5 3:5

6:7 7:10 9:19

17:7

schedule 11:18

Second 7:14

seconds 8:2

Section 4:9 6:21

see 15:21 19:24

20:14

semi-volatile

11:21 12:14

13:3,24 18:3,20

19:5,11,21

20:19

September 10:23

11:25

seriously 17:13

Services 5:4 6:6

serving 6:22

session 8:14

set 11:3

settings 18:25

sheet 8:19,20

shipments 9:23

shop 21:23

Shorthand 3:20

23:4,22

show 19:2 21:18

22:6

showed 18:1

sic 17:24

Siegel 2:5 16:20

16:20,24,25

significantly

17:20 18:7 20:9

simply 9:20 12:2

solid 9:23

Solutions 1:4 3:4

4:17 6:6 7:10

22:8

Solution's 9:19

source 10:10

12:11

Southern 6:9

speak 7:17,22

9:11 15:13,22

speaker 16:18

speakers 15:13

15:17 16:1,5,8

21:13,17

speaking 21:1,9

21:18,23

specific 10:8 11:4

13:18

specified 13:4

spell 7:20 8:12

9:13 16:18

spiked 19:2

St 3:14,16 4:22

5:6 6:9,11,14

17:2

standards 10:9

10:12 12:9

14:18,20,22

18:12

state 7:20 9:13

16:18 23:23

STATES 1:2 3:2

storage 9:21,25

Street 4:21 5:5

stringent 13:6

students 17:1

subject 10:11

12:4,9

subjected 17:9

submit 8:8 9:3

submitted 15:3
 HEARING 12/3/2014

www.midwestlitigation.com Phone: 1.800.280.3376 Fax: 314.644.1334

MIDWEST LITIGATION SERVICES

sufficient 14:12

Suite 4:21

supercede 13:6

supplement 13:2

supplied 11:1

supports 17:20

sworn 23:8

system 13:14

17:23,24 19:25

systems 13:17,20

20:3

S-I-E-G-E-L

16:21

T

take 7:14 15:11

15:20 16:1,9

21:19

taken 23:10,15

takers 21:8

team 17:3

Technical 1:4 3:4

4:16 6:6 7:10

9:19 22:8

temporarily

13:13

temporary 9:25

ten 19:12,17

term 11:1

Terry 16:22,25

test 11:18 13:22

14:2 18:1,21,23

19:1,19 20:6

testifying 15:11

16:17

testimony 8:15

23:7,10

tests 11:24 12:21

19:12

thank 15:8,15

20:21,23,24

21:5,14 22:5

thereto 23:17

think 15:25 21:7

Thompson 3:15

4:20 6:10

three 8:1 10:1

11:19 13:15

time 8:3,5 15:10

15:12,18,22,25

16:8 21:1

Title 10:5,10,15

10:19,22 12:7

13:8

today 6:25 7:4,7

7:16 8:9,20 9:3

9:11 14:24 15:2

today's 6:23 7:12

12:4

tonight 22:2,4

to-wit 3:23

transcript 6:24

6:25

transfers 9:24

treatment 9:20

two 7:12

types 10:8 11:4

typewriting

23:12

T-E-R-R-Y

16:23

U

unclear 20:11

unexplainable

18:2

unfortunately

18:22

UNITED 1:2 3:2

units 20:1,5

University 6:9

17:2

unreliable 11:12

update 12:16

use 14:14 20:16

utility 18:15

U.S 4:3

V

V 10:5,10,15,19

10:22 12:7 13:8

valid 10:16

variability 18:2,7

19:16 20:4,8

varies 10:2

Veolia 1:1,4 3:1,4

4:16 6:6 7:10

9:19,20,22 10:2

10:9,20,22 11:1

11:2,6,8,18,23

12:7,9,21 13:13

13:16 14:3,7,10

14:13 17:10,21

18:15,21 19:10

19:12,19,24

22:7

Veolia's 11:13

12:3,15,20,25

13:4,9 17:7,13

17:17,18,25

19:16

verify 12:11

13:21

vicinity 17:11

volatile 12:14

13:4,24

W

Wang 16:22,22

16:25

want 16:11

Washington 17:2

waste 9:21,25

10:2 11:2,4,16

12:18,23 13:11

14:5 19:13,17

19:18

wastes 9:24

waste-generati...

19:15

Watson 3:19 5:1

23:3

website 6:19

Wednesday 3:16

welcome 16:17

West 4:12

we'll 16:9 21:17

21:19,23

We're 16:14 22:1

wish 7:22

wishes 7:24

wishing 7:17

witness 23:7,10

work 17:3

writing 15:1

written 7:21 8:16

8:23 9:3 15:1,2

20:1,13 22:3

www.regulatio...

6:17 8:25

W-A-N-G 16:23

Y

year 10:17

years 10:16

#

#084-001317 5:3

#1376 5:2

1

101 23:9

12 10:23,24 14:7

18:14 20:17

15 14:1 21:21,23

16 2:5

16th 6:14

19th 9:4,6 22:5

2

2 18:3 20:1

2002 3:16 6:8

2008 10:23,24

11:9,25 12:2,15

18:23

2013 12:1,21

2014 1:7 3:7,17

6:4,15 20:20

22:7

23rd 6:15

255/2 23:9

2600 4:21

3

3 1:7 3:7,17 18:4

20:1

3rd 6:4 22:7

3:01 3:17 6:3

30 8:2 15:11,21

312.353.0987

4:14

314 5:7

314.552.6000

4:23

5

5 4:4 6:22 23:9

5:10 16:15

505 4:21

6

6 2:3

601 3:15 6:10

60604-3590 4:13

62201 3:16

63101 4:22 5:6

644-2191 5:7

7

7th 4:21

7:00 3:18 22:6,12

711 5:5

77 4:12

9

9 2:4