alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON 

MEDICAL USES OF ISOTOPES TO MEET MAY 7-8 

 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Medical Uses of 

Isotopes (ACMUI) will meet May 7-8 to discuss, among other items, the National Council on 

Radiation Protection and Measurements Report 160 “Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the 

Population of the United States” and its implications for NRC programs. 

 The Committee will also discuss subcommittee reports on reportable events involving 

radioactive materials for medical uses; training and experience for the medical uses of yttrium-90 

microspheres to fight liver cancer; and a summary of the NRC’s enforcement process and actions 

against medical licensees. 

 The ACMUI advises the NRC on policy and technical issues related to the regulation of 

medical uses of certain radioactive materials. 

The public portion of the meeting will be on Thursday, May 7, from 8 a.m. to 3:15 p.m. 

and Friday, May 8, from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. A detailed agenda is available at 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acmui/agenda. 

The meeting will be held at NRC headquarters, Two White Flint North Building’s 

Auditorium, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md. Questions from the public will be permitted 

at the discretion of the committee chairperson. Any member of the public wishing to provide a 

written statement, or otherwise participate in the meeting, or meeting attendee requiring special 

services, should contact Ashley Cockerham, by phone at (240) 888-7129 or email 

ashley.cockerham@nrc.gov. All submittals must be received by April 30, and must pertain to a 

topic on the meeting agenda. 

Minutes of the meeting will be available in early June. The draft transcript will be 

available in early June on the ACMUI Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/acmui/tr/ and in the NRC Public Document Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 

Md. 20852-2738, telephone (800) 397-4209. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 09-072 April 14, 2009
### 

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand. 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
### §3662. Rate and service complaints

(a) In General.—Any interested person (including an officer of the Postal Regulatory Commission representing the interests of the general public) who believes the Postal Service is not operating in conformance with the requirements of the provisions of sections 101(d), 401(2), 403(c), 404a, or 601, or this chapter (or regulations promulgated under any of those provisions) may lodge a complaint with the Postal Regulatory Commission in such form and manner as the Commission may prescribe.

(b) Prompt Response Required.—

(1) In general.—The Postal Regulatory Commission shall, within 90 days after receiving a complaint under subsection (a)—

(A) either—

(i) upon a finding that such complaint raises material issues of fact or law, begin proceedings on such complaint; or

(ii) issue an order dismissing the complaint; and

(B) with respect to any action taken under subparagraph (A)(i) or (ii), issue a written statement setting forth the bases of its determination.

(2) Treatment of complaints not timely acted on.—For purposes of section 3663, any complaint under subsection (a) on which the Commission fails to act in the time and manner required by paragraph (1) shall be treated in the same way as if it had been dismissed pursuant to an order issued by the Commission on the last day allowable for the issuance of such order under paragraph (1).

(c) Action Required if Complaint Found To Be Justified.—If the Postal Regulatory Commission finds the complaint to be justified, it shall order that the Postal Service take such action as the Commission considers appropriate in order to achieve compliance with the applicable requirements and to remedy the effects of any noncompliance (such as ordering unlawful rates to be adjusted to lawful levels, ordering the cancellation of market tests, ordering the Postal Service to discontinue providing loss-making products, or requiring the Postal Service to make up for revenue shortfalls in competitive products).

(d) Authority To Order Fines in Cases of Deliberate Noncompliance.—In addition, in cases of deliberate noncompliance by the Postal Service with the requirements of this title, the Postal Regulatory Commission may order, based on the nature, circumstances, extent, and seriousness of the noncompliance, a fine (in the amount specified by the Commission in its order) for each incidence of noncompliance. Fines resulting from the provision of competitive products shall be paid from the Competitive Products Fund established in section 2011. All receipts from fines imposed under this subsection shall be deposited in the general fund of the Treasury of the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 109–435, title II, §205, Dec. 20, 2006, 120 Stat. 3216.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3662, Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 764, related to rate and service complaints, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 109–435, title II, §205, Dec. 20, 2006, 120 Stat. 3216.
###### Editorial Note on Part 8b

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 8b appear at 68 FR 51353, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 8b.16 Discrimination prohibited.

No qualified handicapped individual shall, because a recipient's facilities are inaccessible to or unusable by handicapped individuals, be denied the benefits of, be excluded from participation in, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity to which this part applies.
§ 412.201 Management succession. The head of each agency, in consultation with OPM, must develop a comprehensive management succession program, based on the agency's workforce succession plans, to fill agency supervisory and managerial positions. These programs must be supported by employee training and development programs. The focus of the program should be to develop managers as well as strengthen organizational capability, and to ensure an adequate number of well-prepared and qualified candidates for leadership positions. These programs must: ( a ) Implement developmental training consistent with agency succession management plans;
( b ) Provide continuing learning experiences throughout an employee's career, such as details, mentoring, coaching, learning groups, and projects. These experiences should provide broad knowledge and practical experience linked to OPM's Federal leadership competencies, as well as agency-identified, mission-related competencies, and should be consistent with the agency's succession management plan; and
( c ) Include program evaluations pursuant to 5 CFR 410.202.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, EDRN: Biomarkers Reference Laboratories (EDRN:BRL).                    

*Date:*                         December 9, 2004.                    

*Time:*                         12 p.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6130 Executive Blvd., Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Timothy C. Meeker, MD, Scientific Review Administrator, Special Referral and Resources Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8088, Rockville, MD 20852 (301) 594-1279.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower, 93.399, Cancer Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 2, 2004.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-25016 Filed 11-9-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-12-0052 - Annual Report to the Commission on Licensee Performance in the Materials and Waste Programs Fiscal Year 2011

Accession Number: ML120600613

Date Released: Friday, April 20, 2012

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML120610639 - SECY-12-0052- Annual Report to the Commission on License Performance in the Materials and Waste Programs Fiscal Year 2011 (7 page(s), 4/4/2012)
    - ML120600623 - SECY-12-0052 - Enclosure 1:  Nuclear Material Events Database Annual Report (50 page(s), 2/1/2012)
    - ML120600605 - SECY-12-0052 - Enclosure 2:  Abnormal Occurrence Event Study Breakdown (2 page(s), 4/4/2012)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
§ 923.131 General. This subpart sets forth the requirements for review of approved State coastal zone management (CZM) programs pursuant to section 312 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1458). This subpart defines “continuing review” and other important terms, and sets forth the procedures for: ( a ) Conducting continuing reviews of approved State CZM programs;
( b ) Providing for public participation;
( c ) Invoking interim sanctions for non-adherence to an approved coastal zone management program or a portion of such program; and
( d ) Withdrawing program approval and financial assistance.
[57 FR 31113, July 14, 1992. Redesignated and amended at 61 FR 33818, June 28, 1996]
#### § 894.305 Am I eligible to enroll if I am a former spouse receiving an apportionment of annuity?

No. Former spouses receiving an apportionment of annuity are not eligible to enroll in FEDVIP. However, a *TEI former spouse* is eligible to enroll in a FEDVIP vision plan as long as he or she remains unremarried.

[83 FR 58178, Nov. 19, 2018]
### **CHAPTER 133—POLLUTION PREVENTION**

Sec.
13101.
Findings and policy.
13102.
Definitions.
13103.
EPA activities.
13104.
Grants to States for State technical assistance programs.
13105.
Source Reduction Clearinghouse.
13106.
Source reduction and recycling data collection.
13107.
EPA report.
13108.
Savings provisions.
13109.
Authorization of appropriations.
§ 801.3 Reporting requirements. Except for surveys subject to rulemaking in §§ 801.7, 801.8, 801.10, 801.11, 801.12, and 801.13, reporting requirements for all other surveys conducted by the Bureau of Economic Analysis shall be as follows: ( a ) Notice of specific reporting requirements, including who is required to report, the information to be reported, the manner of reporting, and the time and place of filing reports, will be published by the Director of the Bureau of Economic Analysis in the Federal Register prior to the implementation of a survey;
( b ) In accordance with section 3104(b)(2) of title 22 of the United States Code, persons notified of these surveys and subject to the jurisdiction of the United States shall furnish, under oath, any report containing information which is determined to be necessary to carry out the surveys and studies provided for by the Act; and
( c ) Persons not notified in writing of their filing obligation by the Bureau of Economic Analysis are not required to complete the survey.
[85 FR 31052, May 22, 2020, as amended at 87 FR 54887, Sept. 8, 2022]
§ 923.85 Procedural requirements of other Federal law. NOAA shall determine on a case-by-case basis whether each program change requires NOAA to take additional actions under any other Federal requirements. ( a ) If a state's program change will affect the resources or interests of any federally-recognized Indian Tribe (tribe), NOAA shall contact the affected tribe(s) and determine if Government-to-Government consultation is desired under Executive Order 13175 (Nov. 6, 2000).
( b ) If, for the purposes of ESA, NHPA, MSFCMA or MMPA compliance, NOAA determines that a state's program change will have effects on listed threatened or endangered species, historic properties, essential fish habitat or marine mammals, then NOAA shall determine if consultation is needed with the applicable Federal agency under the ESA, NHPA, MSFCMA and MMPA.
( c ) When NOAA determines whether to consult under other Federal statutes or tribal executive orders, NOAA's ability to require changes to a state's proposed program change are limited by the following: ( 1 ) Once NOAA approves a state's management program, NOAA cannot require a state to change its program. NOAA can, through periodic evaluations of a state's management program under section 312 of the Act, establish necessary actions if NOAA finds a state is not adhering to its NOAA-approved program, but NOAA can only recommend that a state change its program to create a different state standard or to address emerging issues; and
( 2 ) NOAA can approve or disapprove a program change request. When NOAA reviews a program change, NOAA has a limited ability to require a state to make changes to state policies. If NOAA disapproves a program change request, this does not require a state to change state law. Therefore, there is no effect from NOAA's denial on the implementation of state law at the state (or local government) level. NOAA's denial means the disapproved state policy is not part of the state's NOAA-approved management program and cannot be used for CZMA Federal consistency purposes. NOAA cannot use a program change to require changes to other parts of a state's management program.
### §11503. Report

(a) Requirement.—Not later than 180 days after the completion of the pilot program under this chapter, the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy shall—

(1) submit to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget a report on the results and findings under the program; and

(2) provide a copy of the report to Congress.

(b) Content.—The report shall include—

(1) a detailed description of the results of the program, as measured by the criteria established for the program; and

(2) a discussion of legislation that the Administrator recommends, or changes in regulations that the Administrator considers necessary, to improve overall information resources management in the Federal Government.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1246; Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title VIII, §825(b)(2)(B)(iii), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2616; Pub. L. 107–347, title II, §210(h)(2)(B)(iii), Dec. 17, 2002, 116 Stat. 2938.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 11503 | 40:1473. | Pub. L. 104–106, div. E, title LIII, §5303, Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 692. |

Section

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2002—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 107–314 and Pub. L. 107–347 amended subsec. (a) identically, substituting "the pilot" for "a pilot" in introductory provisions.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2002 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 107–347 effective 120 days after Dec. 17, 2002, see section 402(a) of Pub. L. 107–347, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3601 of Title 44, Public Printing and Documents.
Exhibit 16.1

[Coopers & Lybrand Letterhead]




April 15, 1997




Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Gentlemen:

We have read the statements made by Clark Refining & Marketing, Inc. (copy 
attached), which we understand will be filed with the Commission, pursuant to 
Item 4 of Form 8-K, as part of the Company's Form 8-K report for the month 
of April 1997.  We agree with the statements concerning our Firm in such 8-K.  
We agree with the statements concerning our Firm in such 8-K, except that we 
were previously informed that the requisite number of Board resolutions of 
Clark USA, Inc. "the Company's parent" confirming our dismissal were received 
on April 4, 1997.


Very truly yours,


/s/  Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

mrl/ymf
Attachment
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1666

CLAUDIA SANCHEZ GLOVER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN

SERVICES,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA04-693-CCB)

Submitted: October 26, 2005 Decided: November 14, 2005

Before TRAXLER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Claudia Sanchez Glover, Appellant Pro Se. John Walter Sippel, Jr.,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland; Sherri

Lanette Evans, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Washington,

D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*This court does not have jurisdiction to review the March 4,

2005 order dismissing Glover’s complaint because Glover failed to

file a timely notice of appeal from that order. When the United

States or its officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal

must be filed no more than sixty days after the entry of the

district court’s final judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P.

4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and

jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr., 434 U.S.

257, 264 (1978). The district court’s order of dismissal was

entered on the docket on March 4, 2005. Glover’s motion for

reconsideration did not toll the sixty day period because it was

not filed within ten days of the March 4 order. See Fed. R. App.

P. 4(a)(4). Glover’s notice of appeal was filed on June 6, 2005,

or beyond the sixty day appeal period from the March 4, 2005 order.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Claudia Sanchez Glover appeals a district court order

denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the

record and the district court order and affirm substantially for

the reasons stated by the district court. See Glover v. Secretary,

HHS, No. CA-04-693-CCB (D. Md. May 2, 2005).* We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### SUBCHAPTER XIII—CLEAN AIR COAL PROGRAM
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

September 13, 2005

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 04-16212

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 03-62291-CV-JEM

ERIC GOLDSTEIN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

CITY OF SUNRISE, a municipal corporation, 

ROBERT STEIN, Captain, individually, 

DAVID BOYETT, Chief, individually, 

Defendants, 

JAMES SKELLION, Lt., individually, 

Defendant-CounterClaimant-Appellant, 

versus 

F. SCOTT FISTEL, 

Third-Party-DefendantCounter-Defendant. 
2

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(September 13, 2005)

Before ANDERSON, DUBINA and CARNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This is Lt. James Skellion’s appeal from the district court’s omnibus order

holding that he is not entitled to qualified immunity and, consistent with that

holding, denying Skellion’s motion to dismiss and his motion for summary

judgment. Skellion’s only argument on appeal is that a Title VII violation cannot

provide the sole basis for the 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim that Eric Goldstein asserts

against him in count III in his amended complaint. See Arrington v. Cobb County, 

139 F.3d 865, 872 (11th Cir. 1998) (“Of course, an allegation of a Title VII

violation cannot provide the sole basis for a § 1983 claim. [A] plaintiff cannot

bootstrap an untimely Title VII claim by bringing a § 1983 action based only on a

statutory violation of Title VII.”) (internal citations omitted). Skellion misreads

the amended complaint. Count III of the amended complaint alleges that Skellion,

among others, “clearly violated established statutory or constitutional rights”

(emphasis added) of Goldstein. Accordingly, the premise of Skellion’s appeal is

mistaken.
3

AFFIRMED.
### §50307. Service of process

As a condition to the exercise of any power or privilege granted by this chapter, the corporation shall file, with the secretary of state or other designated official of each State in which a chapter is organized, the name and address of an agent in that State on whom legal process or demands against the corporation may be served.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1345.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 50307 | 36:90j. | June 17, 1932, ch. 268, §10, 47 Stat. 321; July 15, 1942, ch. 505, §7, 56 Stat. 660. |

Section

The words "precedent", "herein", and "or conferred" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "with the secretary of state or other designated official" are substituted for "in the office of the secretary" for consistency in the revised title. The words "post-office" and "authorized" are omitted as unnecessary.