alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 766.5 Filing and service of papers other than charging letter. ( a ) *Filing.* All papers to be filed shall be addressed to EAR Administrative Enforcement Proceedings, U.S. Coast Guard, ALJ Docketing Center, 40 S. Gay Street, Baltimore, Maryland, 21202-4022, or such other place as the administrative law judge may designate. Filing by United States mail, first class postage prepaid, by express or equivalent parcel delivery service, or by hand delivery, is acceptable. Filing by mail from a foreign country shall be by airmail. In addition, the administrative law judge may authorize filing of papers by facsimile or other electronic means, provided that a hard copy of any such paper is subsequently filed. A copy of each paper filed shall be simultaneously served on each party.
( b ) *Service.* Service shall be made by personal delivery or by mailing one copy of each paper to each party in the proceeding. Service by delivery service or facsimile, in the manner set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, is acceptable. Service on BIS shall be addressed to the Chief Counsel for Industry and Security, Room H-3839, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230. Service on a respondent shall be to the address to which the charging letter was sent or to such other address as respondent may provide. When a party has appeared by counsel or other representative, service on counsel or other representative shall constitute service on that party.
( c ) *Date.* The date of filing or service is the day when the papers are deposited in the mail or are delivered in person, by delivery service, or by facsimile.
( d ) *Certificate of service.* A certificate of service signed by the party making service, stating the date and manner of service, shall accompany every paper, other than the charging letter, filed and served on parties.
( e ) *Computing period of time.* In computing any period of time prescribed or allowed by this part or by order of the administrative law judge or the Under Secretary, the day of the act, event, or default from which the designated period of time begins to run is not to be included. The last day of the period so computed is to be included unless it is a Saturday, a Sunday, or a legal holiday (as defined in Rule 6(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure), in which case the period runs until the end of the next day which is neither a Saturday, a Sunday, nor a legal holiday. Intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays are excluded from the computation when the period of time prescribed or allowed is seven days or less.
[61 FR 12907, Mar. 25, 1996, as amended at 67 FR 45633, July 10, 2002; 70 FR 8250, Feb. 18, 2005]
**EXHIBIT23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statementson Form S-3 (file Nos. 333-66460 and 333-82762) andForm S-8 (Nos. 333-41374, 333-49978 and 333-102741)of Network Engines, Inc. of our reports dated December 14, 2005,relating to the consolidated financial statements, financial statementschedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting which appears in this Form 10-K.
| /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
| Boston, Massachusetts          |   |
| December 14, 2005         |   |

 

----
#### § 890.1302 Duration.

The demonstration project will run from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2002.
NRC TO DISCUSS FUKUSHIMA-RELATED ORDER

ON CONTAINMENT VENTS MAY 2 IN ROCKVILLE, MD

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with interested groups and members of 

the public on Wednesday, May 2, in Rockville, Md., to discuss how some U.S. nuclear power 

plants will implement an Order regarding systems to vent pressure from reactor containment 

buildings. 

The meeting will run from 9 a.m. to noon EDT in the Commissioners’ Hearing Room at

the NRC Headquarters complex, 11555 Rockville Pike in Rockville. Members of the public can 

also participate in the meeting via teleconference at 800-857-9802, passcode 38283, as well as 

via webinar.

Anyone interested in attending in person or via phone is strongly encouraged to contact 

Robert Fretz ahead of time at 301-415-1980 or robert.fretz@nrc.gov; he also has webinar log-in 

information.

The meeting will discuss the staff’s interim guidance for meeting the requirements of the 

Order, which applies to U.S. boiling-water reactors with “Mark I” and “Mark II” containment 

designs. The Order requires Mark I plants to ensure their venting systems are hardened and 

reliable; Mark II plants must install hardened reliable vents. The meeting will also discuss the 

concept of adding filters to the vents.

A task force of senior NRC officials recommended issuing the Order after concluding 

reliable hardened vents would allow Mark I and II containments to more effectively and safely 

release excessive containment pressure after a serious accident. The task force based the 

recommendation on the lessons learned from events at Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power 

plant. The Commission approved the task force recommendation and the NRC issued the Order 

on March 12. 

###

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand.

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 12-040 April 18, 2012
### §1129. Center of excellence in contracting for services

The Administrator shall maintain a center of excellence in contracting for services. The center shall assist the acquisition community by identifying, and serving as a clearinghouse for, best practices in contracting for services in the public and private sectors.

(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3690.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1129 | 41:405 note. | Pub. L. 108–136, title XIV, §1431(b), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1671. |

Section

The words "Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act" are omitted, and the word "maintain" is substituted for "establish", to eliminate obsolete words.
##### 



Exhibit 10.38
   
    Granted To:
    
    Richard A. Kozak(the Employee for Incentive Stock Options, or the Optionee for Non-Qualified Stock Options)Grant Date:
    
    August 9, 2005Granted:
    
    3,704Grant Price:
    
    $0.0000The close of business on the business day immediately preceding:Vesting Schedule:
    
    Board Restricted Stock1,852 on 02/09/20061,852 on 08/09/2006
  o
 Signature:
    
    /s/ Richard A. KozakRichard A. Kozak
 Note: If there are any discrepancies in the name or address shown above,
please make the appropriate corrections on this form.
#### Lewis R. Shapiro et al., Appellants, v. Menander T. Constant et al., Respondents.

Action to recover a down payment made in connection with a contract for the purchase of real property, and for damages and expenses. Order denying plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment, pursuant to rule 114 of the Rules of Civil Practice, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Lewis, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
**GAO-03-363**                      Published: Feb 14, 2003. Publicly Released: Feb 14, 2003.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Status of FY22 Projects 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

About 3,000 public housing authorities--state, county, and municipal agencies--develop and manage low-income housing in cooperation with the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Since 1979, 15 housing authorities have been placed in the hands of receivers' outside parties designated to manage the authorities during a specific period of time, usually several years. GAO was asked to identify the circumstances that led to receiverships, any differences in the way they operate and in their results, and the factors that have influenced the termination of receiverships.

## Full Report

Highlights

Full Report (39 pages)

Accessible Text 

## Office of Public Affairs

### Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

### Public Inquiries

Public Affairs
PublicAffairs@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

Housing

Housing programsLow income housingProgram managementPublic housingHousingFair housingRacial segregationPublic housing revitalizationUrban developmentLitigation
### SUBCHAPTER II—COAL
# CP^ . <> ^.^>-^ . V i;;Aiv5F0RMTI0

W . ^^^^_; ^

,2U^L ^

^^^.^w ^

-^^^--^^

. _. . ^

fcA-/* ? ^-^ - ^ ^,_; ^

^^•^.^—^'^ ^

.•g:3i.<. - z^^u^-^-^^^^A ^

/iM^^ —
§ 870.507 Open enrollment periods. ( a ) There are no regularly scheduled open enrollment periods for life insurance. Open enrollment periods are held only when specifically scheduled by OPM.
( b ) During an open enrollment period, unless OPM announces otherwise, eligible employees may cancel their existing waivers of Basic and/or Optional insurance by electing the insurance in a manner designated by OPM.
( c ) ( 1 ) OPM sets the effective date for all insurance elected during an open enrollment period. The newly elected insurance is effective on the 1st day of the 1st pay period that begins on or after the OPM-established date and that follows a pay period during which the employee was in pay and duty status for at least 32 hours, unless OPM announces otherwise.
( 2 ) A part-time employee must be in pay and duty status for one-half the regularly-scheduled tour of duty shown on his or her current Standard Form 50 for newly-elected coverage to become effective, unless OPM announces otherwise.
( 3 ) An employee who has no regularly-scheduled tour of duty or who is employed on an intermittent basis must be in pay and duty status for one-half the hours customarily worked before newly-elected coverage can become effective, unless OPM announces otherwise. For the purpose of this paragraph, an employing office may determine the number of hours customarily worked by averaging the number of hours worked in the most recent calendar year quarter prior to the start of the open enrollment period.
( d ) Within 6 months after an open enrollment period ends, an employing office may determine that an employee was unable, for reasons beyond his or her control, to cancel an existing waiver by electing to be insured during the open enrollment period. An election under this paragraph must be submitted within 60 days after being notified of the determination. Coverage is retroactive to the first pay period that begins on or after the effective date set by OPM and that follows a pay period during which the employee was in pay and duty status for at least 32 hours, unless OPM announces otherwise. If the employee does not file an election within this 60-day time limit, he or she will be considered to have waived coverage.
[75 FR 60579, Oct. 1, 2010]
#### § 930.64 Federal permitting agency responsibility.

Following receipt of a State agency objection to a consistency certification, the Federal agency shall not issue the federal license or permit except as provided in subpart H of this part.
No. II-12-028 May 7, 2012

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416

NRC SCHEDULES PUBLIC MEETING MAY 15 TO DISCUSS 

STATUS OF INSPECTIONS AT BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a public meeting near the 

Browns Ferry nuclear power plant to discuss the status of NRC supplemental inspections being 

performed as a result of a “red” inspection finding at the Tennessee Valley Authority facility. 

The meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, May 15, at 4 p.m. CDT at the Calhoun 

Community College Aerospace Training Center, 6250 Highway 31 North in Tanner, Ala.

The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the status of NRC inspection and oversight of 

TVA’s performance improvement plan and related activities associated with the red finding. 

The meeting will include members of the NRC supplemental inspection team as well as 

managers from the NRC’s Region II office in Atlanta. After TVA’s presentation, NRC staff will 

be available to answer questions from the public.

Members of the public interested in participating by telephone should contact the NRC's 

Eugene Guthrie before the meeting at 404-997-4662 or eugene.guthrie@nrc.gov . 

The “red” finding was issued in May 2011 because of the failure of a low pressure 

coolant injection valve at the plant the previous fall. That valve is part of a system that would be 

used for core cooling during certain accident scenarios and its inoperable state could have led to 

core damage had a series of unlikely events occurred. The valve was promptly repaired. Under 

the NRC’s oversight process, a “red” finding has “high safety significance” and results in 

increased NRC inspection and oversight of the facility.

The increased NRC oversight at Browns Ferry includes a broad set of supplemental 

inspections to evaluate safety, organizational and programmatic issues at the plant. The 

inspections represent a far more extensive review of programs and processes than those 

conducted as part of the NRC’s baseline inspection program. The facility’s safety culture is also 

being assessed.

The three-unit Browns Ferry plant is located near Athens, about 32 miles west of 

Huntsville. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave. NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
NRC SEEKS COMMENT ON PROPOSED GUIDANCE FOR EXAMINING

PLANT RESPONSE TO UPDATED FLOODING HAZARDS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is seeking public comment on proposed Interim Staff 

Guidance to U.S. nuclear power plants for evaluating how re-analyzed flooding hazards could affect 

plant performance. The need to re-analyze the hazard is one of the lessons learned from the 

Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear accident. The new analysis will take advantage of recent advances in 

understanding flooding hazards.

The proposed guidance would provide a means for meeting the requirements in a request for 

information the staff issued on March 12. The guidance would not be mandatory, but should a plant

decide to take a different approach, the NRC would review both the plant’s methodology and results 

when they submit their response.

The NRC will accept comments on the proposed guidance until Oct. 29; comments can be 

submitted via regulations.gov using Docket ID NRC–2012–0222.

The NRC began examining flooding issues, in the form of upstream dam failures, prior to the 

Fukushima Dai-ichi accident. That work was incorporated into the agency’s post-Fukushima efforts, 

which include requiring all U.S. plants to re-analyze potential flooding hazards at their sites using the 

latest available information. The plants will use present day guidance and analysis methods that have 

been used in new reactor applications to analyze hazards including stream and river flooding, hurricane 

storm surges, tsunami, and dam failures. In May, the NRC announced a schedule for all U.S. nuclear 

power plants to complete the hazard re-analysis by March of 2015. 

If the re-analyzed flood hazards exceed the levels a plant was originally designed for, the plant 

will tell the NRC what interim measures it will use to safely deal with the new hazard. The plant will 

also perform an “integrated assessment” to identify specific vulnerabilities and examine how existing 

or planned systems or procedures will prevent or mitigate flood damage. 

The staff’s draft guidance lays out several assumptions for the integrated assessment, such as 

taking into account available onsite resources and systems for responding to flooding. The assessment

must also consider any mode of operation (at full power, for example, or during a refueling outage) 

that could be affected by a flood, as well as simultaneous events such as losing power from the electric 

grid. The assessment cannot exclude a flooding event based can solely on how rare that flood might be.

The guidance is available on the NRC website. 

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES link on the NRC 

homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website. For the latest 

news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 12-107 September 28, 2012
lb/day tpy

DR‐GE‐01	through	DR‐GE‐07 Drillship	Main	Engines	and	Emergency	Generator 393,124 31,322

All	sources	with	EPN	starting	with		SB Supply	Boats 369,565 38,435

DR‐PO‐01 Painting	(paint	+	thinner) ‐ ‐

DR‐WL‐01,	DR‐WL‐02 Wire	Line	Engines	no.	1	and	2 15,118 1,572

DR‐GE‐08 ROV	Emergency	Generator 486.75 24.34

DR‐AC‐01 Air	Compressor	Diesel	Engine	#1 10.31 0.54

DR‐AC‐02 Air	Compressor	Diesel	Engine	#2 8.59 0.45

DR‐EC‐01	through	DR‐EC‐06 Escape	Capsule	Diesel	Engine	no.	1	to	6 122.55 12.25

DR‐FL‐01 Diesel	Powered	Forklift	Engine 824.61 85.76

DR‐FR‐01 Fast	Rescue	Craft 131.71 13.17

DR‐WB‐01 Water	Blasting	Engine 2,858.65 297.30

DR‐DC‐01	through	DR‐DC‐03 Dust	Collectors	no.	1	to	3 ‐ ‐

DR‐WO‐01 Welding ‐ ‐

DR‐DT‐01	through	DR‐DT‐09 Nine	Drill	Ship	Diesel	Storage	Tanks ‐ ‐

DR‐FT‐01	through	DR‐FT‐03 Three	Drill	Ship	Jet	Fuel	Storage	Tanks ‐‐

DR‐FE‐01 Drillship	Fugitive	Emissions ‐ ‐

DR‐VG‐01 Mud	Degasser	Vent 3,231 336

DR‐CU‐01,	DR‐CU‐02 Drilling	Casing	Units	1	and	2 6,795 706.66

DR‐EL‐01,	DR‐EL‐02 Electric	line	diesel	1	and	2 16,492 1,715

DR‐VS‐01	through	DR‐VS‐05 Well	Evaluation	Engines	No.	1	to	5 19,241 50.11

828,008 74,571

Drilling Scenario

Total Emissions

Air Emission Sources

Table 13. Drilling Scenario – GHG Emissions

EPN(s)
#### Dwight-Helmsley, Inc., Respondent, *v.*Myron Realty Company, Incorporated, Appellant.

*Per Curiam.*

There undoubtedly would have been a triable issue as to whether or not there was consideration for the co-brokerage agreement if the agreement had been oral. That agreement, however, is in writing and signed by the party sought to be charged therewith. The absence of consideration therefore does not affect its validity (Real Property Law, § 279; Personal Property Law, § 33). The only issue raised by the opposing affidavits is the absence of consideration. There is nothing set forth on which to base a claim of fraud or duress in the signing of the agreement.

The order should be reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint granted.

Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ., concur.

Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint granted. Settle order on notice.