alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 13.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the annual report which this certification accompanies,
I, Jean-Cyril Spinetta, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|1 | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2 | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company as of and for the periods
presented in the report.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The foregoing
certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not intended to be used or relied upon for any other purpose.



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|Date: September 29, 2004                 
|                                         
|/s/    Jean-Cyril Spinetta               
|Jean-Cyril Spinetta                      
|Chief Executive Officer of Air France-KLM
Amendment No. 1 to Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.



 EXHIBIT 10.1 
 Amendment No. 1 to 
 Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. Supplemental Deferred Investment Plan 

 WHEREAS, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (the “Company”) adopted and implemented, effective as of October 13, 2006, a
Supplemental Deferred Investment Plan (the “Plan”) for the benefit of a select group of Management and highly-compensated Employees of the Company. 
 WHEREAS, the terms of the Plan are set forth in a Supplemental Deferred Investment Plan Document (the “Plan Document”), which provides in Section 9.1 that the Plan may be amended by the Company’s
Chief Administrative Officer to the extent necessary or advisable to comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). 
 WHEREAS, the Company has determined that the amendment set forth herein is advisable to comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code,
including the final regulations issued under Section 409A. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as set forth below. Capitalized
terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan. 
 1. The last sentence of
Section 5.1 of the Plan Document is hereby amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows: 
 “The lump sum payment
shall be made, or installment payments shall commence, on the first business day of the first month following the six month anniversary of a participant’s date of termination.” 
 The remainder of the Plan Document shall remain in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this Amendment No. 1 to Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. Supplemental Deferred Investment Plan as of June 12, 2007.
  

			
	CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC.
	
	 /s/ Robert D. Wilner

	By:	 	Robert D. Wilner
		 	Chief Administrative Officer
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Theresa A. McKenna, Respondent, against Atlas Contractors Equipment Corp. et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Foster, P. J., Brewster, Santry and Bergan, JJ., concur; Heffernan, J., dissents and votes to affirm the award.
### **CHAPTER 12—EXAMINATION OF APPLICATION**

Sec.
131.
Examination of application.
132.
Notice of rejection; reexamination.
133.
Time for prosecuting application.
134.
Appeal to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
135.
Derivation proceedings.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2011**—Pub. L. 112–29, §3(j)(5), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 291, amended items 134 and 135 generally, substituting "Appeal to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board" for "Appeal to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences" in item 134 and "Derivation proceedings" for "Interferences" in item 135.

**1984**—Pub. L. 98–622, title II, §204(b)(2), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3388, substituted "Patent Appeals and Interferences" for "Appeals" in item 134.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Acceleration Certificate Issued Pursuant to the Patents for Humanity Program

Pub. L. 116–316, Jan. 5, 2021, 134 Stat. 5065, provided that:

#### "SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

"This Act may be cited as the 'Patents for Humanity Program Improvement Act'.

#### "SEC. 2. TRANSFERABILITY OF ACCELERATION CERTIFICATES.

"(a) In General.—A holder of an acceleration certificate issued pursuant to the Patents for Humanity Program (established in the notice entitled 'Humanitarian Awards Pilot Program', published at 77 Fed. Reg. 6544 (February 8, 2012)), or any successor thereto, of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, may transfer (including by sale) the entitlement to such acceleration certificate to another person.

"(b) Requirement.—An acceleration certificate transferred under subsection (a) shall be subject to any other applicable limitations under the notice entitled 'Humanitarian Awards Pilot Program', published at 77 Fed. Reg. 6544 (February 8, 2012), or any successor thereto."
#### § 2003.3 [Reserved]
### §8702. Prohibited conduct

A person may not—

(1) provide, attempt to provide, or offer to provide a kickback;

(2) solicit, accept, or attempt to accept a kickback; or

(3) include the amount of a kickback prohibited by paragraph (1) or (2) in the contract price—

(A) a subcontractor charges a prime contractor or a higher tier subcontractor; or

(B) a prime contractor charges the Federal Government.

(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3839.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8702 | 41:53. | Mar. 8, 1946, ch. 80, §3, 60 Stat. 37; Pub. L. 86–695, Sept. 2, 1960, 74 Stat. 740; Pub. L. 99–634, §2(a), Nov. 7, 1986, 100 Stat. 3524. |

Section

In paragraph (3), before subparagraph (A), the words "directly or indirectly" are omitted as unnecessary.
NRC NAMES MARK A. SATORIUS AS DIRECTOR OF FEDERAL AND STATE 

MATERIALS AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has announced the selection

of Mark A. Satorius as Director of the Office of Federal and State Materials 

and Environmental Management Programs (FSME). He will assume his 

new duties in early October. 

He succeeds Charles L. Miller, who after a long and distinguished 

career, is retiring. Since 2009, Satorius has served as regional administrator, 

Region III in Lisle, Ill. His successor there will be named later.

“I congratulate Mark Satorius on his appointment to this very 

important post,” said NRC Chairman Gregory B. Jaczko. “Throughout his exemplary career, he 

has made an important contribution to the agency’s mission of protecting public health, safety 

and the environment in the regulation of nuclear materials.”

In his new position, Satorius will oversee the office activities and the regulatory 

framework for the safe and secure use of nuclear materials, medical, industrial, academic and 

commercial applications, uranium recovery activities, low-level radioactive waste sites, and the 

decommissioning of previously operating nuclear facilities and power plants. In addition, he will 

work with federal agencies, states, and tribal and local governments on regulatory matters.

Satorius first joined the NRC staff in 1989 as an operating licensing examiner in Region 

IV (Arlington, Texas), and then as a reactor inspector and senior project engineer in that region. 

He served in a number of senior management positions in headquarters that include deputy 

director in the Office of Enforcement, chief of regional operations and program management 

staff in the Office of the Executive Director for Operations, and chief of the performance 

assessment section in the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. In 2004, he returned to Region 

IV as deputy director of reactor projects, the organization responsible for staffing and supporting 

the Resident Inspector program. He was later promoted to Region III as the director of reactor 

projects and later deputy regional administrator.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-129 July 19, 2011
Satorius earned a Bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from the United States 

Naval Academy and served as a nuclear-trained submarine officer.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC’s website.
§ 791.101 Information to be furnished on demand. ( a ) Pursuant to the authority granted to the Secretary under sections 2(a), 2(b), and 2(c) of the Executive Order and IEEPA, persons involved in an ICTS Transaction may be required to furnish under oath, in the form of reports or otherwise, at any time as may be required by the Secretary, complete information relative to any act or transaction, subject to the provisions of this part. The Secretary may require that such reports include the production of any books, contracts, letters, papers, or other hard copy or electronic documents relating to any such act, transaction, or property, in the custody or control of the persons required to make such reports. Reports with respect to transactions may be required either before, during, or after such transactions. The Secretary may, through any person or agency, conduct investigations, hold hearings, administer oaths, examine witnesses, receive evidence, take depositions, and require by subpoena the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of any books, contracts, letters, papers, and other hard copy or documents relating to any matter under investigation, regardless of whether any report has been required or filed in connection therewith.
( b ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the term “document” includes any written, recorded, or graphic matter or other means of preserving thought or expression (including in electronic format), and all tangible things stored in any medium from which information can be processed, transcribed, or obtained directly or indirectly, including correspondence, memoranda, notes, messages, contemporaneous communications such as text and instant messages, letters, emails, spreadsheets, metadata, contracts, bulletins, diaries, chronological data, minutes, books, reports, examinations, charts, ledgers, books of account, invoices, air waybills, bills of lading, worksheets, receipts, printouts, papers, schedules, affidavits, presentations, transcripts, surveys, graphic representations of any kind, drawings, photographs, graphs, video or sound recordings, and motion pictures or other film.
( c ) Persons providing documents to the Secretary pursuant to this section must produce documents in a format useable to the Department of Commerce, which may be detailed in the request for documents or otherwise agreed to by the parties.
###### Editorial Note on Subpart G of Part 9701

#### Editorial Note:

At 73 FR 58435, Oct. 7, 2008, the application of subpart G to part 9701 was rescinded.

#### § 9701.701 Purpose.

This subpart contains the regulations implementing the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 9701(a) through (c) and (f) concerning the Department's appeals system for certain adverse actions covered under subpart F of this part. These provisions require that the new appeals regulations provide Department employees fair treatment, are consistent with the protections of due process and, to the maximum extent practicable, provide for the expeditious handling of appeals.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                       PERFORMANCE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC

                CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                           PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Performance Capital
Management,  LLC  (the  "Company")  for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2004  as  filed  with  the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  David J. Caldwell, as Chief Operations Officer of the Company,
and  Edward  M.  Rucker,  as  Accounting  Manager  of  the  Company, each hereby
certifies,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that,  to  the  best  of  his  knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ David J. Caldwell
------------------------
David J. Caldwell
Chief Operations Officer
November 17, 2004



/s/ Edward M. Rucker
-----------------------
Edward M. Rucker
Accounting Manager
November 17, 2004


The material contained in this exhibit is not deemed "filed" with the Commission
and  is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under
the  Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any
general  incorporation  language  contained in such filing, except to the extent
that  the  Company  specifically  incorporates  it  by  reference.


<PAGE>
ANNABELLA PINERA,

Appellant,

v.

TARGET/SEDGWICK CMS,

Appellees.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 1D15-4077

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 7, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims.

Marjorie Renee Hill, Judge.

Date of Accident: August 24, 2012.

Kimberly A. Hill of Kimberly A. Hill, P.L., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellant.

David S. Gold and David B. Stauber of Litchfield Cavo, LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for 

Appellees.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

In light of the Florida Supreme Court’s decision in Westphal v. City of St. 

Petersburg, 194 So. 3d 311 (Fla. 2016), Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing filed June 

9, 2016, is granted, and our opinion rendered June 7, 2016, is withdrawn. This matter 

CORRECTED PAGES: pg 1

CORRECTION IS UNDERLINED IN 

RED

MAILED: October 7, 2016

BY: KMS
2

is remanded to the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) for reconsideration 

consistent with Westphal. The JCC also shall determine whether additional defenses 

asserted by the Appellees, if any, are appropriately raised and resolved under the 

circumstances of this case and the material change in the law represented 

by Westphal.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

WETHERELL and KELSEY, JJ., and DEMPSEY, ANGELA C., Associate Judge, 

CONCUR.
§ 719.5 Initiation of administrative proceedings. ( a ) *Letter of intent to charge.* The Director of the Office of Export Enforcement, Bureau of Industry and Security, may notify a respondent by letter of the intent to charge. This letter of intent to charge will advise a respondent that BIS has conducted an investigation and intends to recommend that the Secretary of State issue a Notice of Violation and Assessment (NOVA). The letter of intent to charge will be accompanied by a draft NOVA and proposed order, and will give the respondent a specified period of time to contact BIS to discuss settlement of the allegations set forth in the draft NOVA. An administrative enforcement proceeding is not initiated by a letter of intent to charge. If the respondent does not contact BIS within the specified time, or if the respondent requests it, BIS will make its request for initiation of an administrative enforcement proceeding to the Secretary of State in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) *Request for Notice of Violation and Assessment (NOVA).* The Director of the Office of Export Enforcement, Bureau of Industry and Security, may request that the Secretary of State initiate an administrative enforcement proceeding under this § 719.5 and 22 CFR 103.7. If the request is in accordance with applicable law, the Secretary of State will initiate an administrative enforcement proceeding by issuing a NOVA. The Office of Chief Counsel shall serve the NOVA as directed by the Secretary of State.
( c ) *Content of NOVA.* The NOVA shall constitute a formal complaint, and will set forth the basis for the issuance of the proposed order. It will set forth the alleged violation(s) and the essential facts with respect to the alleged violation(s), reference the relevant statutory, regulatory or other provisions, and state the amount of the civil penalty to be assessed. The NOVA will inform the respondent of the right to request a hearing pursuant to § 719.6 of the CWCR, inform the respondent that failure to request such a hearing shall result in the proposed order becoming final and unappealable on signature of the Secretary of State, and provide payment instructions. A copy of the regulations that govern the administrative proceedings will accompany the NOVA.
( d ) *Proposed order.* A proposed order shall accompany every NOVA, letter of intent to charge, and draft NOVA. It will briefly set forth the substance of the alleged violation(s) and the statutory, regulatory or other provisions violated. It will state the amount of the civil penalty to be assessed.
( e ) *Notice.* Notice of the intent to charge or of the initiation of formal proceedings shall be given to the respondent (or respondent's agent for service of process, or attorney) by sending relevant documents, via first class mail, facsimile, or by personal delivery.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**Chief Executive Officer Certification**

I, Paul T. Wood, Chief Executive Officer and Presidentof Brand Energy & Infrastructure Services, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Brand Energy & Infrastructure Services, Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand we have:

(a)          designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

(b)         evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report on such evaluation; and

(c)          disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

(a)          all significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)         any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls over financial reporting;
| Date: November 2, 2006 | /s/ Paul T. Wood                   |
|-----------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                        | Paul T. Wood                       |
|                        | Chief Executive Officer, President |

 

----