alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Description of Nonemployee Director Compensation Policy



 Exhibit 10.6 
  
 Description of Nonemployee Director Compensation Policy 
  
 The following describes the Company’s Compensation Policy for Nonemployee Directors (the
“Policy”). 
  
 Pursuant to the Policy, all nonemployee Directors receive
an annual fee of $12,000. In addition, the Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) receives an additional annual fee of $13,000, the Chairman of the Audit Committee of the Board receives an additional annual fee of
$5,000, and the Chairmen of the Compensation Committee and the Strategic Planning Committee of the Board each receive an additional annual fee of $4,000. Annual fees are payable quarterly in advance. 
  
 In addition, each nonemployee Director receives a $1,000 fee for each Board meeting attended,
and each member of a Board Committee receives an additional $1,000 fee for each Committee meeting attended. A payment will be made only for a meeting where minutes of that meeting are prepared. Nonemployee Directors also receive reimbursement for
their reasonable out-of-pocket costs of attending Board and Committee meetings. 
  
 Nonemployee Directors receive an initial grant of 40,000 stock options upon joining the Board (the “Initial Grant”). An additional grant of 40,000 stock options is also made to any nonemployee Director who becomes Chairman of the
Board (the “Chairman Grant”). Each nonemployee Director receives an annual grant of 20,000 stock options (the “Annual Grant”) on the annual option grant date for officers and employees of the Company, except for the Chairman of
the Board, who receives an annual grant of 30,000 stock options. 
  
 The options
granted to nonemployee Directors are nonqualified stock options, and have an exercise price equal to the mean between the high and low sales prices of the Company’s Common Stock as quoted on The Nasdaq Stock Market on the grant date. Each
Initial Grant and Chairman Grant generally vests on a monthly basis over the 24 months immediately following the grant date, and each Annual Grant generally vests on a monthly basis over the 12 months immediately following the grant date. All
vesting of the options will cease 90 days after the nonemployee Director ceases to serve on the Board. Options become exercisable in full immediately upon the occurrence of a change in control of the Company. A change in control of the Company would
occur on the happening of such events as the beneficial ownership by a person or group of 30 percent or more of the outstanding Common Stock of the Company, certain changes in Board membership affecting a majority of positions, certain mergers or
consolidations, a sale or other transfer of all or substantially all the Company’s assets, or approval by the stockholders of a plan of liquidation or dissolution of the Company, as well as any change in control required to be reported by the
proxy disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Payment of the exercise price may be made in cash or by delivery of previously acquired shares of Common Stock having a fair market value equal to the aggregate exercise price.
### §1103. Special provisions relating to claims based upon effects of tobacco products

(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a veteran's disability or death shall not be considered to have resulted from personal injury suffered or disease contracted in the line of duty in the active military, naval, air, or space service for purposes of this title on the basis that it resulted from injury or disease attributable to the use of tobacco products by the veteran during the veteran's service.

(b) Nothing in subsection (a) shall be construed as precluding the establishment of service connection for disability or death from a disease or injury which is otherwise shown to have been incurred or aggravated in active military, naval, air, or space service or which became manifest to the requisite degree of disability during any applicable presumptive period specified in section 1112 or 1116 of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 105–178, title VIII, §8202(a)(1), as added Pub. L. 105–206, title IX, §9014(a), July 22, 1998, 112 Stat. 865; amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, §926(a)(6), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3830.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1103 was renumbered section 1104 of this title.

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 substituted "air, or space service" for "or air service" in subsecs. (a) and (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Title IX of Pub. L. 105–206 effective simultaneously with enactment of Pub. L. 105–178 and to be treated as included in Pub. L. 105–178 at time of enactment, see section 9016 of Pub. L. 105–206, set out as an Effective Date of 1998 Amendment note under section 101 of Title 23, Highways.

Pub. L. 105–178, title VIII, §8202(b), as amended by Pub. L. 105–206, title IX, §9014(a), July 22, 1998, 112 Stat. 865, provided that: "Section 1103 of title 38, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply with respect to claims received by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs after the date of the enactment of this Act [June 9, 1998]."
### §1721. Power to make rules and regulations

Rules and regulations prescribed under section 501(a) of this title shall include rules and regulations to promote good conduct on the part of persons who are receiving hospital, nursing home, and domiciliary care and medical services in Department facilities. The Secretary may prescribe in rules and regulations under such section limitations in connection with the furnishing of such care and services during a period of national emergency (other than a period of war or an emergency described in section 8111A of this title).

(Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1143, §621; Pub. L. 94–581, title II, §§202(j), 210(a)(8), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2856, 2863; Pub. L. 100–322, title I, §133, May 20, 1988, 102 Stat. 507; Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §402(d)(1), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 239; renumbered §1721 and amended Pub. L. 102–83, §§2(c)(1), 4(a)(3), (4), (b)(1), (2)(E), 5(a), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 402, 404–406.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Prior section 1721 was renumbered section 3521 of this title.

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), renumbered section 621 of this title as this section.

Pub. L. 102–83, §4(b)(1), (2)(E), substituted "Secretary" for "Administrator".

Pub. L. 102–83, §4(a)(3), (4), substituted "Department" for "Veterans' Administration".

Pub. L. 102–83, §2(c)(1), substituted "501(a)" for "210(c)(1)".

Pub. L. 102–40 substituted "8111A" for "5011A".

1988—Pub. L. 100–322 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "The Administrator shall prescribe—

"(1) such rules and procedure governing the furnishing of hospital, nursing home, and domiciliary care as the Administrator may deem proper and necessary;

"(2) limitations in connection with the furnishing of hospital, nursing home, and domiciliary care; and

"(3) such rules and regulations as the Administrator deems necessary in order to promote good conduct on the part of persons who are receiving hospital, nursing home, or domiciliary care in Veterans' Administration facilities."

1976—Cl. (1). Pub. L. 94–581, §§202(j), 210(a)(8), substituted "hospital, nursing home, and domiciliary care as the Administrator may deem" for "hospital and domiciliary care as he may deem".

Cl. (2). Pub. L. 94–581, §202(j), substituted "hospital, nursing home, and domiciliary care" for "hospital and domiciliary care".

Cl. (3). Pub. L. 94–581, §§202(j), 210(a)(8), substituted "as the Administrator deems" for "as he deems" and "hospital, nursing home, or domiciliary care" for "hospital or domiciliary care".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1976 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 94–581 effective Oct. 21, 1976, see section 211 of Pub. L. 94–581, set out as a note under section 111 of this title.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 223 (Friday, November 19, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67736-67737]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25743]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[Report No. 2680]


Petitions for Reconsideration of Action in Rulemaking Proceeding

October 29, 2004.
    Petitions for Reconsideration have been filed in the Commission's 
Rulemaking proceedings listed in this Public Notice and published 
pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e). The full text of this document is 
available for viewing and copying in Room CY-B402, 445 12th Street, 
SW., Washington, DC, or may be purchased from the Commission's copy 
contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI) (1-800-378-3160). 
Oppositions to these petitions must be filed by December 6, 2004. See 
section 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies 
to an opposition must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing 
oppositions have expired.

    Subject: In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service 
Support Mechanism (CC Docket No. 02-6).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 1.

    Subject: In the Matter of Modification of Parts 2 and 15 of the 
Commission's Rules for unlicensed devices and equipment approval (ET 
Docket No. 03-201).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 1.

    Subject: In the Matter of Rules and Regulations Implementing the

[[Page 67737]]

Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act 
of 2003 (CG Docket No. 04-53).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 1.

Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04-25743 Filed 11-18-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
#### § 919.440 What method do I use to communicate those requirements to participants?

To communicate the requirement, you must include a term or condition in the transaction requiring the participants' compliance with subpart C of this part and requiring them to include a similar term or condition in lower-tier covered transactions.
Northwest Russia Business Delegation to Visit the U.S. in April 1999

----

**March 1999**
                      The American Chamber of Commerce in Russia  will lead a delegation of Northwest Russianbusinesses and government representatives to the United States during the second half of April.The delegation, consisting of governors and business leaders from several oblasts in this region,will travel to New York, Boston, and Washington, D.C., to foster trade and investment tiesbetween the United States and Northwest Russia.  
For more information, contact the American Chamber of Commerce in Russia: tel:  +7 (095)961-2141; fax: +7 (095) 961-2142; email: [email protected].
***This report is provided courtesy of the Business Information Service for the NewlyIndependent States (BISNIS)***
#### Celia Mishkin, Respondent, v. Morris Mishkin, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Present — Townley, Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents and votes to reverse on the ground that the issue whether plaintiff intended to waive her right to the weekly payments in question is an issue of fact to be determined after a trial and should not be disposed of as an issue of law on motion addressed to these pleadings.
#### § 40.5 Other cooperative arrangements.

The Bureau of the Census also undertakes the training of foreign nationals proposed through the Department of State under the International Exchange Service (IES) or under the sponsorship of public international agencies.
Exhibit 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
   of Corio, Inc.:



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-103843, 333-63322, 333-81600 and
333-45948) and the registration statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-110065) of
Corio, Inc. of our report dated January 26, 2004, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of Corio, Inc. as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and
comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2003 and the related financial statement schedule,
which report appears in the December 31, 2003, annual report on Form 10-K of
Corio, Inc.



Our report refers to a change in the method of accounting
for goodwill and other acquired intangible assets in 2002.



/s/    KPMG LLP



Mountain View, California
   March 26, 2004

---
§ 280.207 Answer and demand for hearing. ( a ) *When to answer.* The respondent must answer the charging letter within 30 days after being served with notice of the issuance of a charging letter instituting an administrative enforcement proceeding, or within 30 days of notice of any supplement or amendment to a charging letter, unless time is extended under § 280.217 of this part.
( b ) *Contents of answer.* The answer must be responsive to the charging letter and must fully set forth the nature of the respondent's defense or defenses. The answer must admit or deny specifically each separate allegation of the charging letter; if the respondent is without knowledge, the answer must so state and will operate as a denial. Failure to deny or controvert a particular allegation will be deemed an admission of that allegation. The answer must also set forth any additional or new matter the respondent believes supports a defense or claim of mitigation. Any defense or partial defense not specifically set forth in the answer shall be deemed waived, and evidence thereon may be refused, except for good cause shown.
( c ) *Demand for hearing.* If the respondent desires a hearing, a written demand for one must be submitted with the answer. Any demand by the Department for a hearing must be filed with the administrative law judge within 30 days after service of the answer. Failure to make a timely written demand for a hearing shall be deemed a waiver of the party's right to a hearing, except for good cause shown. If no party demands a hearing, the matter will go forward in accordance with the procedures set forth in § 280.216 of this part.
( d ) *English language required.* The answer, all other papers, and all documentary evidence must be submitted in English, or translations into English must be filed and served at the same time.
[61 FR 50558, Sept. 26, 1996. Redesignated and amended at 65 FR 39802, June 28, 2000]
#### Mrs. Vernon FISHER, Movant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

June 4, 1948.

Roy Wilhoit for movant.

A. E. Punk, Attorney General and Zeb A. Stewart, Assistant Attorney General, opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal denied. Judgment affirmed.
(September 30, 1953.)

#### Ruth E. Maloney, as Administratrix of the Estate of Thomas F. Maloney, Deceased, Respondent, v. State of New York, Appellant.

(Claim No. 31319.)

— Order insofar as appealed from reversed on the law, without costs of this appeal to either party, and motion denied. Memorandum: We conclude that in the absence of statutory authority, the Court of Claims is without power to order a discovery and inspection under section 324 of the Civil Practice Act. All concur. (Appeal from part of an order permitting claimant’s attorney or representative to inspect and photograph machinery and equipment of a boat.) Present — MeCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ. [204 Misc. 263.]
September 21, 2011 

MEMORANDUM TO: R. W. Borchardt 

 Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS – SECY-11-0089 – OPTIONS FOR 

PROCEEDING WITH FUTURE LEVEL 3 PROBABILISTIC RISK 

ASSESSMENT (PRA) ACTIVITIES 

The Commission has approved a modified version of Option 3 to conduct a full-scope 

comprehensive site level 3 PRA. The staff should plan for and perform a new full-scope 

comprehensive site Level 3 PRA for an operating plant, as described in Option 3. However, to 

alleviate some of the near-term resource challenges and to allow adequate time for a careful 

site selection process, the schedule for the Level 3 PRA described in Option 3 should be 

extended to 4 years. The staff should engage industry stakeholders to select the most 

appropriate pilot site. 

The staff should explore the benefits of working collaboratively, as appropriate, with the Electric 

Power Research Institute. 

The staff should incorporate both technical and project management insights from the ongoing 

state-of-the-art reactor consequence analysis (SOARCA) project as well as from other relevant 

activities as described in the “Other Options” section of SECY-11-0089 to ensure technically 

sound, disciplined, and timely completion of any planned site Level 3 PRA activities. In 

particular, the staff should build on the SOARCA work to gain a better understanding of potential 

radiological effects of postulated accident sequences, particularly in the analysis of accidents at 

multiple units on a site and from the additional source terms contributed by spent fuel pools and 

dry casks. 

The staff should develop a detailed project plan to complete this work and provide a copy to the 

Commission for its information within six months of the SRM resulting from this paper. 

(EDO) (SECY Suspense: 3/21/12) 

The staff should provide briefings to Commission staff on at least an annual basis to assure that 

the Commission remains fully informed and engaged as this work proceeds. 

(EDO) (SECY Suspense: 9/21/12) 

The agency’s endeavors towards a Level 3 PRA will need to be developed with rigor and 

discipline to ensure that the end results of the analysis will meet the vision of maintaining and 

enhancing the NRC’s technical competence and regulatory decision making. A necessary 

outgrowth of this effort should be the development, early in the project, of a clear articulation of 

how the results of the analysis can be applied consistent with the NRC’s Principles of Good 
Regulation. A paper updating the Commission regarding the staff’s plans to apply the Level 3 

PRA results to the NRC’s regulatory framework should be provided to the Commission for 

information 12 months after the issuance of the staff requirements memorandum (SRM) 

resulting from SECY-11-0089. 

(EDO) (SECY Suspense: 9/21/12) 

cc: Chairman Jaczko 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Apostolakis 

 Commissioner Magwood 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA 

 OPA 

 Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.6


                                 FIRST AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                            NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS
                            LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
                            (AS AMENDED AND RESTATED)

         WHEREAS, GP Natural Resource Partners LLC (the "Company") maintains the
Natural Resource Partners Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "LTIP") for the purpose
of granting Awards thereunder to eligible employees of the Company and its
Affiliates who perform services for Natural Resource Partners L.P.; and

         WHEREAS, certain Affiliates separately maintain nonqualified deferred
compensation plans pursuant to which their eligible employees may electively
defer compensation to be paid by their employer; and

         WHEREAS, to clarify that Awards granted by the Company under the LTIP
to employees of such Affiliates may be deferred under such plans;

         NOW, THEREFORE, Section 7 of the LTIP is amended by adding thereto a
new paragraph (k), Participation by Affiliates, to read as follows:

                  "(k)  Participation by Affiliates. With respect to the Awards
         made to the employees of an Affiliate, the Company shall act as an
         agent of such participating Affiliate. In this regard, the Company
         shall make payment with respect to such Awards directly to the
         participating Affiliate, which, in turn, shall be responsible for
         making the payments with respect to such Awards to its eligible
         employees."

         All terms used herein that are defined in the Plan shall have the same
meanings given to such terms in the Plan, except as otherwise expressly provided
herein.

         Except as amended and modified hereby, the Plan shall continue in full
force and effect and the Plan and this instrument shall be read, taken and
construed as one and the same instrument.

         Executed this 8th day of December, 2003.

                                       GP Natural Resource Partners LLC

                                       By:    /s/ Wyatt L. Hogan
                                           -------------------------------------
                                       Name:  Wyatt L. Hogan
                                       Title: Vice President and General Counsel
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-2203

AHMED GBADANSI MURTALA,

Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (A72-163-325)

Submitted: March 3, 2004 Decided: March 19, 2004

Before MICHAEL, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Allan Ebert, LAW OFFICES OF ALLAN EBERT, Washington, D.C., for

Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, John C.

Cunningham, Senior Litigation Counsel, Larry P. Cote, OFFICE OF

IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Ahmed Gbadansi Murtala, a native and citizen of Nigeria,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen deportation

proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and

find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying

Murtala’s motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2003);

INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992). Accordingly, we deny

the petition for review on the reasoning of the Board. See In re:

Murtala, No. A72-163-325 (B.I.A. Sept. 4, 2003). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of 3Power Energy Group Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Toby Durrant, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: September 2, 2011





By:
/s/ Toby DurrantName:     Toby DurrantTitle:       Principal Executive Officer andPrincipal Financial Officer
#### § 23.4 Cost and percentage estimates.

It is estimated that this program will cost the Department of Commerce $39,530 in the first year. It is the Department of Commerce's estimate that 9% of its penalty mail will transmit missing children photographs and information when the program is fully implemented.