alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [License No. 02/72-0610]

Notice is hereby given that Gefus SBIC, L.P., 375 Park Avenue, Suite 2401, New York, NY 10152, a Federal Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (“the Act”), in connection with the financing of a small concern, has sought an exemption under section 312 of the Act and section 107.730, Financings which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). Gefus SBIC, L.P. proposes to provide equity/debt security financing to Idetic, Inc. The financing is contemplated for operating expenses and for general corporate purposes.

The financing is brought within the purview of § 107.730(a)(1) of the Regulations because Gefus Capital Partners I, L.P. , Gefus Strategic Partners I, L.P., Inman Ventures I, L.P. and Admiral Bobby Inman, all Associates of Gefus SBIC, L.P., own more than ten percent of Idetic, Inc.

Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit written comments on the transaction to the Associate Administrator for Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416.

Dated: November 9, 2004.

Harry Haskins,

Acting Associate Administrator for Investment.

[FR Doc. 04-25312 Filed 11-12-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
# L_2022267EN.01001201.xml

| 13.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 267/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 267/12

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 171/2022

of 10 June 2022

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2022/1871]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/2166 of 3 December 2021 on the unresolved objections regarding the conditions for granting an authorisation for the biocidal product Teknol Aqua 1411-01 in accordance with Article 36 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/2166 of 3 December 2021 on the unresolved objections regarding the conditions for granting an authorisation for the biocidal product Teknol Aqua 1411-01 in accordance with Article 36 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 12zzzzzzzt (Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/2174) of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘12zzzzzzzu. | 32021 D 2166: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/2166 of 3 December 2021 on the unresolved objections regarding the conditions for granting an authorisation for the biocidal product Teknol Aqua 1411-01 in accordance with Article 36 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 437, 7.12.2021, p. 10).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘12zzzzzzzu.

32021 D 2166: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/2166 of 3 December 2021 on the unresolved objections regarding the conditions for granting an authorisation for the biocidal product Teknol Aqua 1411-01 in accordance with Article 36 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 437, 7.12.2021, p. 10).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/2166 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 11 June 2022, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 10 June 2022.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Nicolas VON LINGEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 437, 7.12.2021, p. 10.

1

(*)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*

---
No. IV-12-035

Contact: Victor Dricks (817) 200-1128

 Lara Uselding (817) 200-1519

 

September 4, 2012 

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD MEETING WITH ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC, 

AT THE AGENCY’S REGIONAL OFFICE IN TEXAS

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with officials from Entergy 

Operations, Inc., on Sept. 10 to discuss the performance of four of its nuclear power plants. 

The meeting is open to the public and will begin at 8 a.m. in NRC’s Region IV offices at 

1600 E. Lamar in Arlington, Texas. 

 The NRC staff and Entergy officials will discuss topics of mutual interest including 

performance at Arkansas Nuclear One, near Russellville, Ark.; Grand Gulf, near Port Gibson, 

Miss.; River Bend, near Baton Rouge, La.; and Waterford, west of New Orleans, La. Plant 

officials will have an opportunity to respond. The public will have an opportunity to ask 

questions at various times during the meeting.

A phone bridge is available to members of the public by calling 1-888-989-6482 and 

entering pass code 69328. Members of the NRC staff will be available to answer questions from 

members of the public after the business portion of the meeting.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV

 1600 E. Lamar Blvd.

 Arlington, TX 76011-4511

Telephone: (817) 860-8100

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov
§ 80.3 Rules applicable to deceased persons and estates. ( a ) Census information relating to a deceased person may be released only to a parent, child, grandchild, brother, sister, spouse, insurance beneficiary, or the executor or administrator of a deceased person's estate. The request must be signed by a person entitled to receive the information as provided herein, state the relationship of the applicant to the deceased, and include a certified copy of the death certificate or other adequate proof of death. The request of an executor or administrator must be accompanied by a certified copy of the court order of appointment.
( b ) Except for a spouse, a person related to the deceased person through marriage, such as an in-law relationship, is not eligible to request Census information on the deceased, whether or not the applicant was a member of the household of the deceased.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0607-0117) [40 FR 53232, Nov. 17, 1975, as amended at 48 FR 56744, Dec. 23, 1983]
Copyrighted page/s removed. Copyrighted material is not available in Regulations.gov since it may not be reproduced without consent of the copyright holder.

Please contact the EPA Docket Center, Public Reading Room to view this document.

Address: 1301 Constitution Ave, NW

Room 3334 Washington, DC 20004

Telephone: 202-566-1744

Fax: 202-566-9744

Email: docket-customerservice@epa.gov
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 243 (Wednesday, December 19, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 65173]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27377]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial 
Research Special Emphasis Panel; Amelogenesis Model-Special Emphasis 
Panel.
    Date: February 28, 2019.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, 6701 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Yun Mei, MD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Branch, NIDCR, NIH, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, 
Suite #670, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-827-4639, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#afd6dac181c2cac6efc1c6c781c8c0d9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0a737f6424676f634a646362246d657c">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral 
Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 13, 2018.
Natasha M. Copeland,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-27377 Filed 12-18-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 9301.19 Schedule of fees. ( a ) *Prohibitions against charging fees.* Individuals will not be charged for: ( 1 ) The search and review of the record;
( 2 ) Any copies of the record produced as a necessary part of the process of making the record available for access; or
( 3 ) Any copies of the requested record when it has been determined that access can only be accomplished by providing a copy of the record through the mail.
( b ) *Waiver.* The Privacy Officer may, at no charge, provide copies of a record if it is determined that the production of the copies is in the interest of the Government.
( c ) *Fee schedule and method of payment.* Fees will be charged as provided below except as provided in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section. ( 1 ) *Duplication of records.* Records will be duplicated at a rate of $.10 per page for copying of 4 pages or more. There is no charge for copying fewer pages.
( 2 ) Where it is anticipated that the fees chargeable under this section will amount to more than $25, the person making the request shall be notified of the amount of the anticipated fee or such portion thereof as can readily be estimated. In instances where the estimated fees will greatly exceed $25, an advance deposit may be required. The notice or request for an advance deposit shall extend an offer to the person requesting to consult with the Privacy Officer in order to reformulate the request in a manner which will reduce the fees, yet still meet the needs of individuals making the request.
( 3 ) Fees must be paid in full prior to issuance of requested copies. In the event the person requesting is in arrears for previous requests copies will not be provided for any subsequent request until the arrears have been paid in full.
( 4 ) Remittances shall be in the form either of a personal check or bank draft drawn on a bank in the United States, or a postal money order. Remittances shall be made payable to the order of the Treasury of the United States and mailed or delivered to the Privacy Officer, Office of the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, 2530 Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA 22202.
( 5 ) A receipt for fees paid will be given upon request.
§ 280.300 Recorded insignia required prior to offer for sale. Unless the specifications provide otherwise, if a fastener is required by the applicable consensus standard(s) to bear an insignia identifying its manufacturer, the manufacturer must: ( a ) Record the insignia with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office prior to any sale or offer for sale of the fastener; and
( b ) Apply the insignia to any fastener that is sold or offered for sale. The insignia must be readable, and must be applied using the method for applying a permanent insignia that is provided for in the applicable consensus standard(s), or, if the applicable consensus standard(s) do(es) not specify a method for applying a permanent insignia, through any means of imprinting a permanent impression.
[65 FR 39803, June 28, 2000]
#### § 90.5 Who may file a challenge.

A request for a challenge of a population estimate generated by the Census Bureau may be filed only by the chief executive officer or highest elected official of a governmental unit. In those instances where the FSCPE member agency represents a non-functioning county or statistical equivalent, the governor will serve as the chief executive officer or highest elected official.
§ 719.13 Prehearing conference. ( a ) On the ALJ's own motion, or on request of a party, the ALJ may direct the parties to participate in a prehearing conference, either in person or by telephone, to consider: ( 1 ) Simplification of issues;
( 2 ) The necessity or desirability of amendments to pleadings;
( 3 ) Obtaining stipulations of fact and of documents to avoid unnecessary proof; or
( 4 ) Such other matters as may expedite the disposition of the proceedings.
( b ) The ALJ may order the conference proceedings to be recorded electronically or taken by a reporter, transcribed and filed with the ALJ.
( c ) If a prehearing conference is impracticable, the ALJ may direct the parties to correspond with the ALJ to achieve the purposes of such a conference.
( d ) The ALJ will prepare a summary of any actions agreed on or taken pursuant to this section. The summary will include any written stipulations or agreements made by the parties.
§ 906.17 Review by the Regional Administrator. ( a ) If NAO does not receive a timely motion for reconsideration pursuant to § 906.16(a), receives a timely motion and rejects it pursuant to § 906.16(d)(1), or issues a revised decision pursuant to § 906.16(d)(2) or (e), NAO will notify the Regional Administrator and the appellant, and provide a copy of the case record for its decision or revised decision to the Regional Administrator.
( b ) In reviewing NAO's findings of fact, the Regional Administrator may only consider the evidentiary record including arguments, claims, evidence of record and other documents of record that were before NAO when it rendered its decision or revised decision.
( c ) The Regional Administrator may take the following action within 30 days of service of NAO's notification and receipt of the case record under paragraph (a) of this section: ( 1 ) Issue a written decision adopting, remanding, reversing, or modifying NAO's decision or revised decision.
( 2 ) Issue a stay for no more than 90 days to prevent NAO's decision or revised decision from taking effect.
( d ) The Regional Administrator must provide a written decision explaining why an NAO decision or revised decision has been remanded, reversed, or modified. Consistent with § 906.18(b), the Regional Administrator may, but does not need to, issue a written decision to adopt an NAO decision or revised decision.
( e ) The Regional Administrator will serve a copy of any written decision or stay on NAO and the appellant.
### [§201. Repealed. July 16, 1951, ch. 226, §5(a), 65 Stat. 122]

Section, act June 25, 1948, ch. 644, 62 Stat. 680, related to protection of President and family. See section 3056 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The
Board of Directors and Stockholders
RightNow Technologies, Inc.:

We
consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-118515, 333-124329, 333-138543
and 333-141340) of RightNow Technologies, Inc. of our reports dated March 14, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of RightNow Technologies, Inc. as
of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, which reports appear in the
December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of RightNow Technologies, Inc.

Our
report on the consolidated financial statements refers to RightNow Technologies, Inc.'s adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment,
effective January 1, 2006, and Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainties in Income Taxes, an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109,effective January 1, 2007.

/s/
KPMG LLP

Portland,
Oregon
March 14, 2008

---



QuickLinks
#### Lexington Milk Bar, Inc., Respondent, v. 38 East 23rd Street Corp., Appellant.

*579Present — Peek, P. J., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *post,*p. 734.]
Editorial Note on Part 400
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 400 appear at 78 FR 69289, Nov. 19, 2013.

§ 400.26 Criteria for evaluation of proposals, including for zones, expansions, subzones, or other modifications of zones. The Board shall consider the following factors in determining whether to approve an application pertaining to a zone: ( a ) The need for zone services in the port of entry area, taking into account existing as well as projected international trade-related activities and employment impact;
( b ) The suitability of each proposed site and its facilities based on the plans presented for the site, including existing and planned buildings, zone-related activities, and the timeframe for development of the site;
( c ) The specific need and justification for each proposed site, taking into account existing sites and/or other proposed sites;
( d ) The extent of state and local government support, as indicated by the compatibility of the zone project with the community's master plan or stated goals for economic development and the views of state and local public officials involved in economic development. Such officials shall avoid commitments that anticipate the outcome of Board decisions; and
( e ) The views of persons likely to be materially affected by proposed zone activity.
[77 FR 12139, Feb. 28, 2012, as amended at 89 FR 8528, Feb. 8, 2024]
1

Workshop on Probabilistic Flood Hazard 

Assessment

Panel 6: Riverine Flooding

Co-Chairs:

Rajiv Prasad, PNNL, and Will Thomas, Michael Baker

January 30, 2013

Rockville, MD
Panel 6 Presentations
Panel 6 Panelists and 

Rapporteurs

• Panelists:

– Douglas Clemetson, USACE

– John England, BoR

– Nicole Novembre, BoR

– Jery Stedinger, Cornell University

– Mel Schaefer, MGS Engineering

• Rapporteurs

- Peter Chaput, NRC (NRO)

- Jeff Mitman, NRC (NRR)
Panel 6 Questions for 

Discussion
Panel 6 Questions for 

Discussion
#### § 970.403 Previous license and permit obligations.

In order to certify an application, the Administrator must find that the applicant has satisfactorily fulfilled all past obligations under any license or permit previously issued or transferred to the applicant under the Act.
No. IV-11-013

Contact: Victor Dricks (817) 860-8128

 Lara Uselding (817) 276-6519

April 19, 2011 

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov 

NRC TO HOLD OPEN HOUSE TO DISCUSS

2010 PERFORMANCE OF CALLAWAY NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold an open house in Fulton, Mo., on

April 26, to discuss the agency’s 2010 assessment of safety performance for the Callaway nuclear 

power plant.

The open house is informal and will begin at 6 p.m. at the Burton Business Building, 

Classroom 6, William Woods University, One University Ave., in Fulton. Members of the public 

will have an opportunity to meet informally with the NRC staff, ask questions and learn about the 

agency’s role in ensuring safe plant operation.

“The NRC continually reviews the performance of Callaway and the nation’s other 

commercial nuclear power facilities,” NRC Region IV Administrator Elmo E. Collins said. “This 

informal meeting will provide members of the public with an opportunity to learn about our annual 

assessment of safety performance at the plant.”

Although the plant received heightened oversight during the first half of the year, a 

subsequent inspection determined that the appropriate corrective actions were implemented. The 

NRC said Callaway operated safely during 2010 and will receive the detailed inspection regime 

used by the NRC for plants that are operating well. Inspections are performed by two NRC Resident 

Inspectors assigned to the plant and by inspection specialists from the Region IV Office in 

Arlington, Texas.

A letter sent from the NRC Region IV office to plant officials addresses the performance

of the plant during 2010. It is available on the NRC website at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/call_2010q4.pdf.

Current performance information for Callaway is available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/CALL/call_chart.html.

###

NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address:

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125

Telephone: (817) 860-8128

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov
### §7108. Rejection of applications

An application for review on appeal shall not be entertained unless it is in conformity with this chapter.

(Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1243, §4008; renumbered §7108, Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §402(b)(1), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 238.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–40 renumbered section 4008 of this title as this section.
#### § 30.62 Emergency exceptions.

The Census Bureau and CBP may jointly authorize the postponement of or exception to the requirements of the regulations in this Part as warranted by the circumstances in individual cases of emergency where strict enforcement of the regulations would create a hardship. In cases where export control requirements also are involved, the concurrence of the regulatory agency and CBP also will be obtained.