alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. IV-10-25 

Contact: Victor Dricks Phone: (817) 860-8128 

 Lara Uselding Phone (817) 917-0321 

 June 21, 2010 

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

NRC CONDUCTING SPECIAL INSPECTION AT WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has begun a special inspection at the Wolf 

Creek Generating Station to review the circumstances surrounding complications with a plant 

cooling system pump. The incident did not affect public safety and the plant is currently 

operating at full power. Wolf Creek, operated by the Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corp., is 

located about three miles north of Burlington, Kan. 

 Two NRC inspectors, who began their work today, will evaluate the events and 

circumstances surrounding complications that first arose during testing of a component cooling 

water system pump on May 24. During subsequent testing on June 1, operators discovered 

pockets of nitrogen gas trapped in the system. The system is used to cool some safety-related and 

non-safety related components in the plant and acts to transfer heat from one cooling system to 

another to maintain safe operations. 

 “The purpose of this special inspection is to better understand the presence of nitrogen 

pockets and the implications of the condition on system operability,” said Region IV 

Administrator, Elmo E. Collins. 

 The NRC inspectors will develop a chronology of the event, review the licensee’s root 

cause determination, and evaluate the licensee’s maintenance and testing program and the 

effectiveness of operators’ response to the event. The inspection report documenting their 

findings will be publicly available within 45 days of the end of the inspection. 

 Nuclear plant performance is assessed by a combination of objective performance 

indicators reported by the licensee and by NRC inspection findings that are part of the reactor 

oversight process. Wolf Creek is currently in a category requiring additional oversight and 

inspections. 

### 

 NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125 

Telephone: (817) 860-8128
CASPIAN EXPORT MARKETS GROW

----

**June 1998**
**by Judith Robinson**
The energy-rich countries of the Caspian Basin--Azer-baijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan,and Uzbekistan-- are collectively emerging as an important regional market for U.S. exports tothe NIS.  Combined, these countries represent a range of opportunities for U.S. exports, whichgrew 263 percent from 1995 to 1997, to $812 million.  Continued growth is likely as majorenergy development projects get under way.  U.S. companies interested in the region shouldconsider specific export opportunities in individual countries, as well as opportunities connectedwith the region's energy projects, while keeping an eye on the realities of doing business in theCaspian Basin.
**Energy**
#### § 9401.110 Prohibited recommendations.

An employee shall not make recommendations or suggestions, directly or indirectly, concerning the acquisition or sale or other divestiture of a security in an entity supervised by the Bureau, or an entity that is a party or represents a party to a particular matter involving specific parties to which the employee is assigned.

[82 FR 35887, Aug. 2, 2017]
United States General Accounting Office 

Washington, D.C. 20548 

GAO’s Congressional Protocols Addendum 1 

November 1, 2002 

Since January 2000, the General Accounting Office has operated under a set of 

protocols governing GAO’s work for the Congress. The protocols are intended to 

provide clearly defined and transparent policies and practices relating to GAO’s work. 

We developed these protocols in consultation with Members of Congress and their 

staffs, tested them during a pilot implementation phase from January 2000 to 

September 2000, refined them on the basis of feedback from the pilot, and fully 

implemented them in November 2000. 

We have encouraged Members of Congress to contact us with comments or questions 

and we thank them for their feedback. Based on such feedback and our desire to 

maintain a fair and balanced approach to our work, we have decided to modify our 

protocols in two areas immediately: (1) work involving state and local activities and 

(2) comments on proposed legislation. While the changes are important, they affect 

only small sections of the existing document; therefore, we are issuing the following 

addendum to the November 2000 version of GAO’s Congressional Protocols (GAO01-145G). 

State and Local Activities: GAO does not conduct studies, reviews, evaluations or 

audits of state or local programs or activities that are solely within the purview of states 

or localities where there is no connection to federal matters. GAO does review certain 

state and local activities and programs that are (1) carried out in furtherance of federal 

law, such as environmental programs or insurance regulation, or (2) funded by federal 

programs, such as Medicaid, transportation, or education programs. In addition, to 

assist the Congress in developing federal legislation, reexamining the federal role or 

gauging federal performance, GAO sometimes reviews the practices of the states to 

ascertain “best practices” or lessons learned in dealing with particular issues. Further, 

GAO partners with state and local auditors to examine national issues that cross 

geopolitical boundaries (e.g., transportation, homeland security, Medicaid). 

When GAO receives a request from a Member of Congress that focuses on a major 

activity or program that is solely or largely centered in a specific geographical area that 

is represented by members beyond those requesting the work, GAO may advise the 

Members of Congress representing that geographic area of the timing, scope, and 

methodology of the work. After advising the requester, GAO also reserves the right to 

brief such members before the final report is publicly released on the findings, 

conclusions, and recommendations. 

 GAO-03-198G 

On July 16, 2004, GAO issued GAO-04-310G: 

GAO’s Congressional Protocols, which supercedes this 

document and GAO-01-145G.
Exhibit 99(e)



Independent Accountants' Report

The Board of Directors

HSBC Finance Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion that the servicing of credit card receivables owned by Household Credit Card Master Note Trust I, Series 2000-1(the receivables) has been conducted by HSBC Finance Corporation, successor by merger to Household Finance Corporation, as Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Article III and Section 5.08 of the Transfer and Servicing Agreement dated September 25, 2000 (the Agreement), as supplemented,as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004. HSBC Finance Corporation's management is responsible for the assertion.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting that the servicing of receivables has been conducted in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Article III and Section 5.08of the Agreement, as supplemented, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion,management's assertion thatthe servicing of the receivables has been conducted by HSBC Finance Corporation, successor by merger to Household Finance Corporation, as Servicer,in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Article III and Section 5.08 of the Transfer and Servicing Agreement dated September 25, 2000, as supplemented, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of the addressee and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than this specified party.



/s/ KPMG LLP

March 1, 2005





Management Assertion





As of and for the year ended December 31, 2004, the servicing of credit card receivables owned by Household Credit Card Master Note Trust I has been conducted by HSBC Finance Corporation, successor by merger to Household Finance Corporation, as Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles III and Section 5.08 of the Transfer and Servicing Agreement dated September 25, 2000, as supplemented by the Series 2000-1 Series Supplement.



|/s/ Steve Smith
Steve Smith
Servicing Officer
HSBC Finance CorporationMarch 1, 2005
Date
/s/ Margaret Sprude
Margaret Sprude
Chief Financial Officer -
HSBC Finance Corporation - Credit Card ServicesMarch 1, 2005
Date | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR




<PAGE>
EX-23.1 (CONT'D)

CONSENT OF MAULDIN & JENKINS, LLC





                         Consent of Independent Auditor

         We have issued our report dated February 7, 2003, accompanying the
financial statements of Chestatee Bancshares, Inc. as of and for the year ending
December 31, 2002, contained in the Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,
2002. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Form 10-KSB for
the year ended December 31, 2002.

                                                    /s/ Mauldin & Jenkins, LLC

Atlanta, Georgia
March 28, 2003
No. IV-12-014

Contact: Victor Dricks (817) 200-1128

 Lara Uselding (817) 200-1519

April 25, 2012 

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

NRC NAMES NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR 

AT CALLAWAY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has selected 

Tom Hartman as the new senior resident inspector at the 

Callaway plant located near Fulton, Mo.

 “Tom Hartman’s background and experience will assist 

the NRC in carrying out its mission of protecting people and the 

environment and ensuring the safe operation of nuclear power 

plants,” said NRC Region IV Administrator Elmo E. Collins.

In January 2009, Hartman joined the NRC Region III

offices located in Lisle, Ill. as a reactor engineer. He has served as the resident inspector at the 

Perry Nuclear Power Plant in Ohio since 2010. 

Prior to joining the NRC, Hartman worked at the Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant

operated by Xcel Energy as a licensed control room supervisor and fuel handling supervisor. He 

served in the Navy on board the USS Carl Vinson (CVN-70) and as an instructor at the Naval 

Prototype Training Unit in Ballston Spa, New York. Hartman holds a bachelor’s degree in 

Nuclear Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, New York.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant site has at least two NRC resident inspectors.

Hartman joins resident inspector Zach Hollcraft. They serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the 

facility, conducting inspections and monitoring significant work projects.

The Callaway resident inspectors can be reached at: (573) 676-3181.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV

 1600 E. Lamar Blvd.

 Arlington, TX 76011-4511

Telephone: (817) 860-8100

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov
| **No. 1**    October 1998     Letter from    the DirectorWildfires    in MexicoModel    Forest Network Creates Partnership OpportunitiesForest    Level Test of Criteria and IndicatorsNews Bits    from Around the WorldNew    Journals, Books & Web SitesMeeting    Announcements |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Recent Newsletters                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |

Visitors since December 10, 1998
Annual Conference of theAmerican-Uzbekistan Chamber ofCommerce (AUCC)

----

May 25, 1999
Tashkent,
#### § 785.5 Representation.

An individual respondent may appear, in person, or be represented by a duly authorized officer or employee. A partner may appear on behalf of a partnership, or a duly authorized officer or employee of a corporation may appear on behalf of the corporation. If a respondent is represented by counsel, counsel shall be a member in good standing of the bar of any State, Commonwealth or Territory of the United States, or of the District of Columbia, or be licensed to practice law in the country in which counsel resides, if not the United States. The U.S. Government will be represented by the Office of Chief Counsel. A respondent personally, or through counsel or other representative who has the power of attorney to represent the respondent, shall file a notice of appearance with the ALJ, or, in cases where settlement negotiations occur before any filing with the ALJ, with the Office of Chief Counsel.
§ 904.244 Production of documents and inspection. ( a ) *Scope.* If ordered by the Judge, any party may serve on any other party a request to produce a copy of any document or specifically designated category of documents, or to inspect, copy, photograph, or test any such document or tangible thing in the possession, custody, or control of the party upon whom the request is served.
( b ) *Procedure.* The request must set forth: ( 1 ) The items to be produced or inspected by item or by category, described with reasonable particularity, and
( 2 ) A reasonable time, place, and manner for inspection. The party upon whom the request is served must serve within 20 days a response or objections, which must address each item or category and include copies of the requested documents.
###### Editorial Note on Part 922

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

#### § 922.131 Definitions.

In addition to those definitions found at § 922.11, the following definitions apply to this subpart:

*Beneficial use of dredged material* means the use of dredged material removed from any of the four public harbors adjacent to the sanctuary (Pillar Point, Santa Cruz, Moss Landing, and Monterey) that has been determined by the Director to be suitable as a resource for habitat protection or restoration purposes only. Beneficial use of dredged material is not disposal of dredged material.

*Davidson Seamount Management Zone* means the area bounded by geodetic lines connecting a rectangle centered on the top of the Davidson Seamount, and consists of approximately 585 square nmi of ocean waters and the submerged lands thereunder. The shoreward boundary of this portion of the Sanctuary is located approximately 65 nmi off the coast of San Simeon in San Luis Obispo County. Exact coordinates for the Davidson Seamount Management Zone boundary are provided in appendix F to this subpart.

*Federal Project* means any water resources development project conducted by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers or operating under a permit or other authorization issued by the Corps of Engineers and authorized by Federal law.

*Hand tool* means a hand-held implement, utilized for the collection of jade pursuant to 15 CFR 922.132(a)(1), that is no greater than 36 inches in length and has no moving parts (e.g., dive knife, pry bar, or abalone iron). Pneumatic, mechanical, electrical, hydraulic, or explosive tools are, therefore, examples of what does not meet this definition.

*Motorized personal watercraft (MPWC)* means any vessel, propelled by machinery, that is designed to be operated by standing, sitting, or kneeling on, astride, or behind the vessel, in contrast to the conventional manner, where the operator stands or sits inside the vessel; any vessel less than 20 feet in length overall as manufactured and propelled by machinery and that has been exempted from compliance with the U.S. Coast Guard's Maximum Capacities Marking for Load Capacity regulation found at 33 CFR Parts 181 and 183, except submarines; or any other vessel that is less than 20 feet in length overall as manufactured, and is propelled by a water jet pump or drive.

[73 FR 70535, Nov. 20, 2008, as amended at 86 FR 62912, Nov. 15, 2021; 88 FR 967, Jan. 6, 2023]
§ 5.2 Policy. ( a ) The Department adopts the Federal policy announced in the Randolph-Sheppard Vending Stand Act, as amended, to provide blind persons with remunerative employment to enlarge the economic opportunities of the blind and to stimulate the blind to greater efforts in striving to make themselves self-supporting.
( b ) It shall be the policy of the Department to authorize blind persons licensed under the provisions of the Randolph-Sheppard Vending Stand Act, as amended to operate vending stands without any charge for space or necessary utilities on properties owned and occupied by the Department or on which the Department controls maintenance, operation, and protection.
( c ) The Department will cooperate with the Department of Education and State licensing agencies in making surveys to determine whether and where vending stands may be properly and profitably operated by licensed blind persons.
( d ) The application of a State licensing agency for a permit may be denied or revoked if it is determined that the interests of the United States would be adversely affected or the Department would be unduly inconvenienced by the issuance of a permit or its continuance.
( e ) Disagreements concerning the denial, revocation, or modification of a permit may be appealed by the State licensing agency as set forth in § 5.6.
[28 FR 7772, July 31, 1963, as amended at 55 FR 53489, Dec. 31, 1990]
### §2308. Modular contracting for information technology

(a) Use.—To the maximum extent practicable, the head of an executive agency should use modular contracting for an acquisition of a major system of information technology.

(b) Modular Contracting Described.—Under modular contracting, an executive agency's need for a system is satisfied in successive acquisitions of interoperable increments. Each increment complies with common or commercially accepted standards applicable to information technology so that the increments are compatible with other increments of information technology comprising the system.

(c) Provisions in Federal Acquisition Regulation.—The Federal Acquisition Regulation shall provide that—

(1) under the modular contracting process, an acquisition of a major system of information technology may be divided into several smaller acquisition increments that—

(A) are easier to manage individually than would be one comprehensive acquisition;

(B) address complex information technology objectives incrementally in order to enhance the likelihood of achieving workable solutions for attaining those objectives;

(C) provide for delivery, implementation, and testing of workable systems or solutions in discrete increments, each of which comprises a system or solution that is not dependent on a subsequent increment in order to perform its principal functions; and

(D) provide an opportunity for subsequent increments of the acquisition to take advantage of any evolution in technology or needs that occurs during conduct of the earlier increments;

(2) to the maximum extent practicable, a contract for an increment of an information technology acquisition should be awarded within 180 days after the solicitation is issued and, if the contract for that increment cannot be awarded within that period, the increment should be considered for cancellation; and

(3) the information technology provided for in a contract for acquisition of information technology should be delivered within 18 months after the solicitation resulting in award of the contract was issued.

(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3737.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2308 | 41:434. | Pub. L. 93–400, §38, formerly §35, as added Pub. L. 104–106, title LII, §5202(a), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 690; renumbered §38, Pub. L. 104–201, title X, §1074(d)(1), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2660. |

Section
# L_2019074EN.01000101.xml

| 18.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 74/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 74/1

---

Information concerning the signing and provisional application of a Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the State of Israel, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union

The above mentioned Protocol was signed in Brussels on 20 December 2018.

---
#### Mary Mrula, Appellant, v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, Respondent.

Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.
#### § 990.11 Scope.

The Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA), 33 U.S.C. 2701 *et seq.,* provides for the designation of federal, state, and, if designated by the Governor of the state, local officials to act on behalf of the public as trustees for natural resources and for the designation of Indian tribe and foreign officials to act as trustees for natural resources on behalf of, respectively, the tribe or its members and the foreign government. This part may be used by these officials in conducting natural resource damage assessments when natural resources and/or services are injured as a result of an incident involving an actual or substantial threat of a discharge of oil. This part is not intended to affect the recoverability of natural resource damages when recoveries are sought other than in accordance with this part.
### §3105. Buildings not to be draped in mourning

No building owned, or used for public purposes, by the Federal Government shall be draped in mourning nor may public money be used for that purpose.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1143.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3105 | 40:286. | Mar. 3, 1893, ch. 211, §3, 27 Stat. 715. |

Section

The words "On and after March 3, 1893" are omitted as obsolete.