alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES 

 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 REGION I 

 475 ALLENDALE ROAD 

 KING OF PRUSSIA, PA 19406-1415 

February 24, 2010 

Roland G. Fletcher, Manager 

Radiological Health Program 

Air & Radiation Management Administration 

Maryland Department of the Environment 

1800 Washington Blvd, Suite 750 

Baltimore, MD 21230-1724 

Dear Mr. Fletcher: 

A periodic meeting with your Office was held on November 4, 2009. The purpose of the 

meeting was to review and discuss the status of the Maryland Department of the Environment’s 

Agreement State program. The NRC was represented by Michelle Beardsley and me. 

I have completed and enclosed a general meeting summary, including any specific actions that 

will be taken as a result of the meeting. 

If you feel that our conclusions do not accurately summarize the meeting discussion, or have 

any additional remarks about the meeting in general, please contact me at (610) 337-5371, or 

email to Donna.Janda@nrc.gov to discuss your comments. 

Sincerely, 

/RA/ 

Donna M. Janda 

Regional State Agreements Officer 

Division of Nuclear Materials Safety 

Enclosure: As stated 

 
February 24, 2010 

Roland G. Fletcher, Manager 

Radiological Health Program 

Air & Radiation Management Administration 

Maryland Department of the Environment 

1800 Washington Blvd, Suite 750 

Baltimore, MD 21230-1724 

Dear Mr. Fletcher: 

A periodic meeting with your Office was held on November 4, 2009. The purpose of the 

meeting was to review and discuss the status of the Maryland Department of the Environment’s 

Agreement State program. The NRC was represented by Michelle Beardsley and me. 

I have completed and enclosed a general meeting summary, including any specific actions that 

will be taken as a result of the meeting. 

If you feel that our conclusions do not accurately summarize the meeting discussion, or have 

any additional remarks about the meeting in general, please contact me at (610) 337-5371, or 

email to Donna.Janda@nrc.gov to discuss your comments. 

Sincerely, 

/RA/ 

Donna M. Janda 

Regional State Agreements Officer 

Division of Nuclear Materials Safety 

Enclosure: As stated 

Distribution: 

Michelle Beardsley, FSME 

Aaron McCraw, FSME 

Monica Orendi, FSME 

John Kinneman, RI DNMS 

SUNSI Review Complete: DMJ (Reviewer=s Initials) 

DOCUMENT NAME: S:\State Agreement Files\Maryland\11-4-2009 MD Periodic Meeting Summary Cover Letter.doc 

After declaring this document AAn Official Agency Record@ it will be released to the Public. 

To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without attachment/enclosure "E" = Copy with 

attachment/enclosure "N" = No copy ML100550092 

OFFICE DNMS/RI E DNMS/RI N 

NAME DJanda/DMJ JKottan/JJK 

DATE 2/24/2010 2/24/2010 

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
EX-10.01


    AMENDMENT
      TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE AGREEMENT

     

     

    Amendment
      (the “Amendment”), dated as of July 30, 2007, to the Securities Exchange
      Agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”), dated as of April 30, 2007, entered into
      by and among RNS Software, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“RNS”), Livio Susin
      (“Susin”), Regena Therapeutics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Regena”), and the
      shareholders of Regena (“Regena Shareholders”). 

     

    WITNESSETH:

     

    WHEREAS,
      RNS, Susin, Regena and the Regena Shareholders entered into the Exchange
      Agreement as of April 30, 2007; and

     

    WHEREAS,
      each of RNS, Susin, Regena and the Regena Shareholders desire to amend the
      Exchange Agreement for the reasons and in the manner hereinafter set
      forth.

     

    NOW,
      THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained
      herein, and for other good and valuable consideration the receipt and
      sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged the parties hereto agree as
      follows:

     

    1. Section
      2.1 of the Exchange Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the date July 31,
      2007, in the second line thereof and inserting the date August 31,
      2007.

     

    2. Regena
      agrees to pay approximately $5,000 in additional costs incurred by RNS in
      connection with its 10-Q filing which result from the extension of the closing
      date from July 31, 2007, to August 31, 2007. 

     

    3. Except
      as
      explicitly amended by this Amendment, all of the terms and conditions of the
      Exchange Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and the Exchange
      Agreement, as hereby amended, is ratified and affirmed.

     

    4. This
      Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when
      so
      executed and delivered shall be deemed an original and all of which
      counterparts, taken together, shall constitute one and the same
      instrument.

     

    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, each party hereto has caused this Amendment to be duly executed
      as of the date first above written.

     

    RNS
      SOFTWARE, INC.

     

    By:
      /s/
      Livio Susin

               
      President

     

    


     

    


     

    REGENA
      THERAPEUTICS, INC.

     

    By:
      /s/
      Frank A. Wingrove

               
      President

     

     

    RNS
      REDEEMED SHAREHOLDER

     

     

    /s/
      Livio
      Susin

    2189
      West
      2nd
      Avenue,
      Suite 11

    Vancouver,
      BC V6K 1H7

     

    REGENA
      SHAREHOLDERS

     

     

    /s/
      Kurt
      A. Heiar

    3661
      Danielle Court NE

    North
      Liberty, Iowa 52317


    
      
        --

         

      

      
         

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    


    REGENACORP,
      INC.

    by

     

    /s/
      Frank
      A. Wingrove, President

        
      2501 N. Loop Drive

       
      Ames, Iowa 50010
### Adams, Kevin {OST) From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Cc:
Gentlemen, Eric Bookmeyer <ebookmeyer@masoncity.net> Tuesday, March 11, 2014 1:24 PM Devany, Dennis (OST); Adams, Kevin (OST); Schlemmer, Kevin (OST); Pam Osgood '_,

The US DOT is requesting community comments, as specified in the DOT Order Requesting proposals for Mason City's Essential Air Service carrier, to be submitted by March 14, 2014. While we are grateful thatthe DOT requested these proposals on an expedited basis, we must request a7-day extension to the comment period in orderto have more time to consider both proposals. Fort Dodge is included in the same DOT Order and concurs with the extension request. Respectfully,
Eric Bookmeyer, Mayor
City of Mason City 10 First Street NW Mason City, lA 50401 641-421-3600 mayor@masoncity.net NOTICE: Subject to the requirements ofthe Iowa Open Records

### Act, this message and accompanying documents are covered bythe Electronic Communications Privacy

### Act, 18 U.S.C. Subsection 2510-252, as amended, and contains information intended forthe specified individual(s) only. This information may be confidential. Ifyou are notthe intended recipient oran agent responsible for delivering ittothe intended recipient, you are hereby notified thatyou have received this document in errorand thatany review, dissemination, copying, orthe taking ofany action based on the contents ofthis information is strictly prohibited. Ifyou have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message. Thankyou.

1
```

[House Report 107-336]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                    107-336

======================================================================

 
WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 
                  1, NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT OF 2001

                                _______
                                

  December 13 (legislative day, December 12), 2001.--Referred to the 
                House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

Ms. Pryce of Ohio, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 315]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 315, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                summary of provisions of the resolution

    The resolution waives all points of order against the 
conference report to accompany H.R. 1, the No Child Left Behind 
Act of 2001, and against its consideration. The resolution 
further provides that the conference report shall be considered 
as read.

                                  

```
§ 917.30 General. ( a ) 33 U.S.C. 1124a sets up a program of International Cooperation Assistance in marine reseach, marine education and training, and marine advisory services designed to enhance the research and technical capability of developing foreign nations with respect to ocean and coastal resources and to promote the international exchange of information and data with respect to the assessment, development, utilization, and conservation of such resources. Any Sea Grant College or Sea Grant Regional Consortium or any institution of higher education, laboratory, or institute (if such institution, laboratory or institute is located within any state) may apply for and receive International Cooperation Assistance funding.
( b ) International Cooperation Assistance funding proposals will be expected to address: ( 1 ) The nature and focus of the proposed project,
( 2 ) the utilization of institutional and other appropriate resources in the implementation of the project,
( 3 ) a clear indication of the foreign participant's (individual or institution) commitment to the project,
( 4 ) identification of accomplishments expected from a single granting interval,
( 5 ) implicit or explicit out-year commitment of resources, and
( 6 ) the impact of the proposed project on the institution receiving funding.
( c ) The projects supported by International Cooperation Assistance funding are intended to be genuinely cooperative. Innovation and uniqueness will be significant factors in the determination of proposals to be funded. In the case of a proposed international project that is submitted from an institution where a Sea Grant program is in existence, the extent to which the proposed project takes advantage of the Sea Grant institutional capability existing at that institution and thereby strengthening it, as opposed to being a mere appendage to the ongoing Sea Grant program, will also be an important evaluation factor. The U.S. Department of State will be given the opportunity to review all International Cooperation Assistance projects and none will be funded without this consultation. Because the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) also funds international projects of the kind that can be funded under the Sea Grant International Cooperation Assistance program, and, to effect coordination in this area between Sea Grant and UNESCO, the Division of Marine Sciences (UNESCO) will be informed of all International Cooperation Assistance projects funded.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Accounting Officer of Proton Laboratories, Inc.,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Section 1350 of 18
U.S.C. 63.

I, Edward Alexander, the Chief Accounting Officer of Proton Laboratories, Inc.
hereby certify that Proton Laboratories, Inc.'s periodic report on Form 10-KSB
and the financial statements contained therein fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d) and that information contained in the periodic report
on Form 10-KSB and the financial statements contained therein fairly represents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations
of Proton Laboratories, Inc.

Date:  April 12, 2005


Edward Alexander
/s/ Edward Alexander
Chief Accounting Officer of
Proton Laboratories, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Proton
Laboratories, Inc. and will be retained by Proton Laboratories, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SHARIFF ATUN EL, :

also known as DOUGLAS NELSON, :

:

Petitioner, :

:

v. : Civil Action No. 09-2340 (EGS)

:

ERIC HOLDER, :

:

Respondent. :

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter comes before the Court on petitioner’s pro se petition for a writ of habeas

corpus. It appears that petitioner challenges his current custody at the D.C. Jail arising from two

criminal actions pending in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. See Pet. at 1, 3 (page

numbers designated by the Court). Such a challenge must be brought by motion in the Superior

Court under D.C. Code § 23-110. In relevant part D.C. Code § 23-110 provides:

[An] application for a writ of habeas corpus in behalf of a prisoner

who is authorized to apply for relief by motion pursuant to this

section shall not be entertained by . . . any Federal . . . court if it

appears . . . that the Superior Court has denied him relief, unless it

also appears that the remedy bymotion is inadequate or ineffective to

test the legality of his detention. 

D.C. Code § 23-110(g). “Section 23-110 has been found to be adequate and effective because it

is coextensive with habeas corpus.” Saleh v. Braxton, 788 F. Supp. 1232 (D.D.C. 1992); see

Swain v. Pressley, 430 U.S. 372, 375 (1977) (noting that the procedure for collateral review of

Superior Court convictions under § 23-110 “is comparable to that authorized by 28 U.S.C. §

2255 for the United States district courts”). It is settled that “a District of Columbia prisoner has

1
no recourse to a federal judicial forum unless the local remedy is ‘inadequate or ineffective to test

the legality of his detention’” Byrd v. Henderson, 119 F.3d 34, 36-37 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (internal

footnote omitted); Garris v. Lindsay, 794 F.2d 722, 726 (D.C. Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 993

(1986). 

 Petitioner does not demonstrate that the remedy available to him in the Superior Court is

an inadequate or ineffective means to challenge his current custody. Accordingly, the Court will

dismiss the petition without prejudice. An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is 

issued separately.

SIGNED: Emmet G. Sullivan

United States District Judge

DATE: January 8, 2010
§ 743.2 High performance computers: Post shipment verification reporting. ( a ) *Scope.* This section outlines special post-shipment reporting requirements for exports of certain computers to destinations in Computer Tier 3, see § 740.7(d) for a list of these destinations. Post-shipment reports must be submitted in accordance with the provisions of this section, and all relevant records of such exports must be kept in accordance with part 762 of the EAR.
( b ) *Requirement.* Exporters must file post-shipment reports and keep records in accordance with recordkeeping requirements in part 762 of the EAR for high performance computer exports to destinations in Computer Tier 3, as well as, exports of commodities used to enhance computers previously exported or reexported to Computer Tier 3 destinations, where the “Adjusted Peak Performance” (“APP”) is greater than that listed in ECCN 4A003.b in the Commerce Control List, supplement no. 1 to part 774 of the EAR.
( c ) *Information that must be included in each post-shipment report.* No later than the last day of the month following the month in which the export takes place, the exporter must submit the following information to BIS at the address listed in paragraph (d) of this section: ( 1 ) Exporter name, address, and telephone number;
( 2 ) License number;
( 3 ) Date of export;
( 4 ) End-user name, point of contact, address, telephone number;
( 5 ) Carrier;
( 6 ) Air waybill or bill of lading number;
( 7 ) Commodity description, quantities—listed by model numbers, serial numbers, and APP level in WT; and
( 8 ) Certification line for exporters to sign and date. The exporter must certify that the information contained in the report is accurate to the best of his or her knowledge. Note to paragraph ( c
) of this section:
Exporters are required to provide the PRC End-User Certificate Number to BIS as part of their post-shipment report. When providing the PRC End-User Certificate Number to BIS, you must identify the transaction in the post shipment report to which that PRC End-User Certificate Number applies.
( d ) *Address.* A copy of the post-shipment report(s) required under paragraph (b) of this section shall be delivered, via courier, to: U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Enforcement Analysis, HPC Team, 14th Street and Constitution Ave., NW., Room 4065, Washington, DC 20230. Note that BIS will not accept reports sent C.O.D.
[71 FR 20886, Apr. 24, 2006, as amended at 73 FR 35, Jan. 2, 2008; 76 FR 36988, June 24, 2011; 77 FR 39369, July 2, 2012; 79 FR 45296, Aug. 4, 2014; 81 FR 64675, Sept. 20, 2016]
### §589. Installation, repair, and replacement of sidewalks

(a) In General.—An executive agency may install, repair, and replace sidewalks around buildings, installations, property, or grounds that are—

(1) under the agency's control;

(2) owned by the Federal Government; and

(3) located in a State, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, or a territory or possession of the United States.

(b) Reimbursement.—Subsection (a) may be carried out by—

(1) reimbursement to a State or political subdivision of a State, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, or a territory or possession of the United States; or

(2) a means other than reimbursement.

(c) Regulations.—Subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance with regulations the Administrator of General Services prescribes with the approval of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget.

(d) Use of Amounts.—Amounts appropriated to an executive agency for installation, repair, and maintenance, generally, are available to carry out this section.

(e) Liability.—This section does not increase or enlarge the tort liability of the Government for injuries to individuals or damages to property.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1116.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 589 | 40:490(i). | June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title II, §210(i), as added Pub. L. 89–344, Nov. 8, 1965, 79 Stat. 1304. |

Section

In subsections (a) and (b), the words "territory or" are added for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code.

In subsection (c), the words "Director of the Office of Management and Budget" are substituted for "Director of the Bureau of the Budget" in section 210(i) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 because the office of Director of the Bureau of the Budget was redesignated the Director of the Office of Management and Budget by section 102(b) of Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1970 (eff. July 1, 1970, 84 Stat. 2085). Section 102 of Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1970, was repealed by section 5(b) of the Act of September 13, 1982 (Public Law 97–258, 96 Stat. 1085), the first section of which enacted Title 31, United States Code, but the successor provision, 31:502, continued the designation as Director of the Office of Management and Budget.

In subsection (e), the words "beyond such liability presently existing by virtue of any other law" are omitted as unnecessary.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-128319) and in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-131462) of our report dated February 17, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Eschelon Telecom, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005.

 

 
|   | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP |
|--------|---------------------------|

 

Minneapolis, Minnesota

March 13, 2006

 

----
# L_2021149EN.01256001.xml

| 30.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 149/2560 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 149/2560

---

Notice concerning the entry into force of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part, and of the Agreement between the European Union and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland concerning security procedures for exchanging and protecting classified information

The Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part, and of the Agreement between the European Union and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland concerning security procedures for exchanging and protecting classified information (1), signed at Brussels and London on 30 December 2020, will enter into force on 1 May 2021.

1

---

(1)  See pages 10 and 2540 of this Official Journal.

1

---
### §3303. Exclusion of particular source or restriction of solicitation to small business concerns

(a) Exclusion of Particular Source.—

(1) Criteria for exclusion.—An executive agency may provide for the procurement of property or services covered by section 3301 of this title using competitive procedures but excluding a particular source to establish or maintain an alternative source of supply for that property or service if the agency head determines that to do so would—

(A) increase or maintain competition and likely result in reduced overall cost for the procurement, or for an anticipated procurement, of the property or services;

(B) be in the interest of national defense in having a facility (or a producer, manufacturer, or other supplier) available for furnishing the property or service in case of a national emergency or industrial mobilization;

(C) be in the interest of national defense in establishing or maintaining an essential engineering, research, or development capability to be provided by an educational or other nonprofit institution or a Federally funded research and development center;

(D) ensure the continuous availability of a reliable source of supply of the property or service;

(E) satisfy projected needs for the property or service determined on the basis of a history of high demand for the property or service; or

(F) satisfy a critical need for medical, safety, or emergency supplies.

(2) Determination for class disallowed.—A determination under paragraph (1) may not be made for a class of purchases or contracts.

(b) Exclusion of Other Than Small Business Concerns.—An executive agency may provide for the procurement of property or services covered by section 3301 of this title using competitive procedures, but excluding other than small business concerns in furtherance of sections 9 and 15 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638, 644).

(c) Nonapplication of Justification and Approval Requirements.—A contract awarded pursuant to the competitive procedures referred to in subsections (a) and (b) is not subject to the justification and approval required by section 3304(e)(1) of this title.

(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3747.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3303 | 41:253(b). | June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title III, §303(b), 63 Stat. 395; July 12, 1952, ch. 703, §1(m), 66 Stat. 594; Pub. L. 90–268, §2, Mar. 16, 1968, 82 Stat. 49; Pub. L. 98–369, title VII, §2711(a)(1), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 1175; Pub. L. 98–577, title V, §504(a)(1), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 3086; Pub. L. 103–355, title I, §1052, Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3260. |

Section