alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC PRESENTING AT NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES MEETING

MAY 23 IN ATLANTA REGARDING NRC-SPONSORED CANCER RISK STUDY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will present information during the National 

Academy of Sciences’ (NAS) third committee meeting of the NRC-sponsored study, “Analysis 

of Cancer Risks in Populations Near Nuclear Facilities: Phase 1.” The meeting’s public session

will occur on May 23 at the Renaissance Concourse Atlanta Airport Hotel, One Hartsfield Centre 

Parkway in Atlanta.

In the morning session, the NRC will explain the agency’s oversight of the nuclear fuel 

cycle and civilian nuclear fuel facilities, and be available to answer committee member 

questions. Additional speakers in the morning, from other organizations, will discuss the 

examination of epidemiological data as well as Spanish studies of nuclear fuel facilities. In the 

afternoon session, the committee will hear presentations from speakers from other organizations

on U.S. cancer registries and issues that could affect the designs and methods of the NRCrequested work. Members of the public are welcome to attend both sessions, which will also be 

webcast. The NAS asks members of the public to register for the meeting, and the NAS website

has additional details, although they are subject to change. General questions on the study can be 

sent via e-mail to: crs@nas.edu. 

The NAS project will update the 1990 U.S. National Institutes of Health – National 

Cancer Institute (NCI) report, “Cancer in Populations Living Near Nuclear Facilities.” The NRC 

uses the 1990 NCI report as a primary resource when communicating with the public about 

cancer mortality risk in counties that contain or are adjacent to nuclear power facilities. In the 

new study, the NRC is asking the NAS to evaluate cancer diagnosis rates, in addition to mortality 

risk, for populations living near decommissioned, operating and proposed NRC-licensed nuclear 

facilities. Phase 1 of the NAS study will determine whether a technically defensible approach to 

meet the goals of the study request is feasible—and if so, the approach will be developed using 

scientifically sound processes for evaluating cancer risk that could be associated with nuclear 

facilities. 

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC’s website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-086 May 17, 2011
EXHIBIT 31.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, R.B. Harris, certify that:

1. I have reviewed  this annual  report on Form 10-KSB of Royal  Holiday  Mobile
Estates.;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions  about the  effectiveness  of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on our  evaluation  as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors:

a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which  could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability  to record,  process,
summarize and report  financial data and have  identified  for the  registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: September 22, 2003              /s/ R.B. Harris
                                      ---------------------
                                      R.B.Harris
                                      Acting Financial Officer/
                                      Director
EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Airlake Terminal Railway Company

MAR 0 6 2003

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning

the status of Airlake Terminal Railway Company as an employer under

the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231 et seg.) and the Railroad

Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. § 351 et sea.l.

Airlake is a Minnesota limited liability corporation with Progressive Rail,

Inc., a covered employer under the Acts (B.A. No. 4651) as its only

member.1 Airlake was organized on December 16, 2002. In Surface

Transportation Board Finance Docket No. 34295, Airlake filed a notice

of exemption to lease and operate approximately 2.35 miles of rail 

line owned by Progressive Rail in the Airlake Industrial Park. Airlake is

operated by employees of Progressive Rail which, as mentioned

above, is a covered employer under the Acts.

Section 1 (a)(1) of the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231 (a)(1)),

insofar as relevant here, defines a covered employer as:

(i) any carrier by railroad subject to the jurisdiction of

the Surface Transportation Board under Part A of subtitle IV

of title 49, United States Code;

Sections 1 (a) and 1 (b) of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act

(45 U.S.C. §§ 351 (a) and (b)) contain substantially the same definition,

as does section 3231 of the Railroad Retirement Tax Act (26 U.S.C.

§ 3231).

1 "Member" with respect to a limited liability corporation refers to an owner, 

analogous to a partner.

BA#4653
-2-

The evidence of record establishes that Airlake is a carrier operating in

interstate commerce. Accordingly, it is determined that Airlake is an

employer within the meaning of section 1 (a)(1) (i) of the Railroad

Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231 (a)(l)(i)) and the corresponding

provision of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act as of

December 16, 2002, the date as of which it was formed.

V. M. Speakman, Jr.

Jerome F. Kever
### **CHAPTER 1523—NATIONAL MUSIC COUNCIL**

Sec.
152301.
Organization.
152302.
Purposes.
152303.
Membership.
152304.
Governing body.
152305.
Powers.
152306.
Exclusive right to name, seals, emblems, and badges.
152307.
Restrictions.
152308.
Principal office.
152309.
Records and inspection.
152310.
Service of process.
152311.
Liability for acts of officers and agents.
152312.
Distribution of assets on dissolution or final liquidation.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may obtain copies of agreements by contacting the Commission's Office of Agreements at 202-523-5793 or via e-mail at                     *tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.*                     Interested parties may submit comments on an agreement to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within 10 days of the date this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                 

*Agreement No.:*                     011756-002.                 

*Title:*                     New World Alliance/Evergreen Slot Exchange Agreement.                 

*Parties:*                     APL Co. Pte. Ltd. and American President Lines, Ltd.; Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd.; Hyundai Merchant Marine Co., Ltd.; and Evergreen Marine Corp. (Taiwan) Ltd.                 

*Filing Party:*                     Eliot J. Halperin, Esq.; Manelli, Denison & Selter PLLC; 2000 M Street, NW.; 7th Floor; Washington, DC 20036.                 

*Synopsis:*                     The modification would permit greater flexibility in allocating space under the agreement. The parties request expedited review.                 

Dated: November 12, 2004.

By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission. 

Karen V. Gregory, 

Assistant Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 04-25488 Filed 11-16-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
## Division C—Procurement

#### Definitions

For additional definitions of terms used in this division, with certain exceptions, see section 102 of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works.
February 7, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JIMMY RAYNOR AND RUBY LEWIS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH LYNN RAYNOR, DECEASED, 

Appellants

NO. 14-10-01242-CV V.

MOORES MACHINE SHOP, LLC, Appellee

____________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Moores Machine 

Shop, LLC, signed November 19, 2010, was heard on the transcript of the record. We 

have inspected the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore order the 

judgment of the court below REVERSED and REMAND the cause for proceedings in 

accordance with the court's opinion.

We order appellee, Moores Machine Shop, LLC, to pay all costs incurred in this 

appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
### §150909. Statement required in audit report

The corporation shall include in the audit report statement required under section 10101(b)(1)(B) of this title a schedule of all contracts requiring payments greater than $10,000 and all payments of compensation or fees at a rate greater than $10,000 a year.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1397.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 150909 | 36:4514(b) (2d sentence cl. (2)). | July 14, 1964, Pub. L. 88–376, §14(b) (2d sentence cl. (2)), 78 Stat. 324. |

Section

The word "salaries" is omitted as included in "compensation".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Termination of Reporting Requirements

For termination, effective May 15, 2000, of reporting provisions in this section, see section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance, and page 203 of House Document No. 103–7.
1

The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the Western District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-1988

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Mario Flamenco, * Western District of Arkansas.

*

Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

___________

Submitted: January 27, 2004

Filed: February 5, 2004

___________

Before MELLOY, HANSEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

A jury found Mario Flamenco guilty of one count of conspiring to distribute

methamphetamine and one count of aiding and abetting the possession of

methamphetamine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1),

(b)(1)(B)(viii), and 846, and 18 U.S.C. § 2. The district court1

 sentenced him to

concurrent prison terms of 121 months followed by concurrent supervised release

terms of 3 and 4 years. On appeal, counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a
-2-

brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), raising as issues whether the

district court erred in sentencing Flamenco when it denied a downward departure and

refused to find him eligible for a drug-treatment program, and erred at trial when it

made adverse evidentiary rulings and refused to give certain jury instructions.

The district court stated that it would not exercise its discretion to grant a

downward departure based on Flamenco's deportable-alien status; that decision is

unreviewable, see United States v. Lim, 235 F.3d 382, 385 (8th Cir. 2000). A careful

review of the trial transcript shows that the district court's conclusion that Flamenco's

offense was a serious drug trafficking offense precluding a departure for aberrant

behavior under U.S.S.G. § 5K2.20 is correct. Flamenco cannot meet the requirement

of U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2(a)(5). We conclude the district court did not err in leaving the

drug-treatment determination to the Bureau of Prisons, see 18 U.S.C. § 3621(b); did

not abuse its discretion in any of its evidentiary rulings, see United States v. Claxton,

276 F.3d 420, 422 (8th Cir. 2002) (standard of review); and did not err in denying

Flamenco’s requests for jury instructions, see United States v. Lalley, 257 F.3d 751,

755 (8th Cir. 2001) (instructions as a whole must fairly and adequately submit issues

to jury; court will reverse only if error affected defendant’s substantial rights).

Following our independent review, see Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we

find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district

court, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,

      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


EXHIBIT 32.1


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Qlinks America, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof.


I, James O. Mulford, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief.

     1.   The Report complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
          the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of the
          operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods shown in
          such report.




                                                           /s/  James O. Mulford
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       James O. Mulford, Chief Executive Officer


Dated: November 8, 2007
### §2009a. Budgetary treatment of the Postal Service Fund

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the receipts and disbursements of the Postal Service Fund, including disbursements for administrative expenses incurred in connection with the Fund—

(1) shall not be included in the totals of—

(A) the budget of the United States Government as submitted by the President, or

(B) the congressional budget (including allocations of budget authority and outlays provided therein);

(2) shall be exempt from any general budget limitation imposed by statute on expenditures and net lending (budget outlays) of the United States Government; and

(3) shall be exempt from any order issued under part C of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, and shall not be counted for purposes of calculating the deficit under section 3(6) of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 for purposes of comparison with the maximum deficit amount under the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 nor counted in calculating the excess deficit for purposes of sections 251 and 252 1 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, for any fiscal year.

(Added Pub. L. 101–239, title IV, §4001(a)(1), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2133.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, referred to in par. (3), is title II of Pub. L. 99–177, Dec. 12, 1985, 99 Stat. 1038. Part C of the Act is classified generally to subchapter I (§900 et seq.) of chapter 20 of Title 2, The Congress. Sections 251 and 252 of the Act are classified to sections 901 and 902, respectively, of Title 2, and were amended generally by Pub. L. 101–508, title XIII, §13101(a), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–577, 1388–581. Section 251 of the Act was further amended generally by Pub. L. 112–25, title I, §101, Aug. 2, 2011, 125 Stat. 241. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 900 of Title 2 and Tables.

Section 3(6) of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974, referred to in par. (3), is classified to section 622(6) of Title 2.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 101–239, title IV, §4001(c), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2133, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [enacting this section] shall apply with respect to budgets for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1989."

#### Construction

Pub. L. 101–239, title IV, §4001(b), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2133, provided that: "Nothing in any amendment made by subsection (a) [enacting this section] shall be considered to diminish the oversight responsibilities or authority of the Congress under law, rule, or regulation with respect to the budget and operations of the United States Postal Service."

1 See References in Text note below.
JAPANESE GOVERNMENT ASKS FOR ASSISTANCE WITH REACTOR EVENTS;

U.S. GOVERNMENT AND NRC PREPARING RESPONSE

The Japanese government has formally asked for assistance from the United States as it 

continues to respond to nuclear power plant cooling issues triggered by an earthquake and 

tsunami on March 11. As part of a larger U.S. government response, the NRC is considering 

possible replies to the request, which includes providing technical advice.

Included in a U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) team dispatched 

earlier to Japan to assist with the disaster are two boiling-water reactor (BWR) experts from the 

NRC. They are currently in Tokyo offering technical assistance. USAID is the federal 

government agency primarily responsible for providing help to countries recovering from a 

disaster.

The NRC has been monitoring the Japanese reactor events via its Headquarters 

Operations Center in Rockville, Md., on a 24-hour-a-day basis.

The NRC will not comment on hour-to-hour developments at the Japanese reactors. This 

is an ongoing crisis for the Japanese who have primary responsibility.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-047 March 14, 2011
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE, ACCOUNTING AND

FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of New PacificVentures, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended January 31, 2005, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I Brent Petterson, Secretary/Treasurer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

   (1)  the Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

   (2)  the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/Brent PettersonBrent PettersonSecretary/TreasurerMarch 15, 2005