alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. III-10-017 

Contacts: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662 

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663 

 May 18, 2010 

 E-Mail: opa3@nrc.gov

Web site: www.nrc.gov

NRC SCHEDULES OPEN HOUSE TO DISCUSS CLINTON NUCLEAR POWER 

PLANT PERFORMANCE AND RELATED ISSUES JUNE 2 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled an open house for Wednesday, 

June 2, to discuss with local residents the agency’s assessment of safety performance for last 

year at the Clinton nuclear power plant and other NRC oversight activities. The plant, operated 

by Exelon Generating Company is in Clinton Ill., 24 miles northeast of Springfield. 

The open house will be informal and begin at 6 p.m. CDT at the Elks Club, 1520 E. 

South St., in Clinton. 

 “The NRC continually reviews the performance of the Clinton plant and the nation’s 

other commercial nuclear power facilities,” said NRC Region III Administrator Mark Satorius. 

“This meeting allows us to discuss our annual assessment of safety performance with members 

of the local community. The goal of this open house is to explain how the NRC works and 

answer questions from residents about nuclear regulation.” 

A letter sent from the NRC Region III office to plant officials addressed the performance 

of the plant during 2009 and will serve as the basis for the discussion. It is available on the NRC 

Web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/clin_2009q4.pdf. 

 Overall, the NRC found that the Clinton nuclear plant met all NRC safety objectives 

during 2009, and performance was at a level that resulted in no additional NRC oversight. The 

NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess nuclear plant 

performance. The colors start with “green” and then increase to “white,” “yellow” or “red,” 

commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. 

 All performance indicators and inspection findings for Clinton during 2009 were 

determined to be “green.” Performance indicators are a statistical measurement of plant and 

equipment performance. 

 

 Clinton will continue to receive the detailed inspection regime used by the NRC for 

plants that require no additional oversight. Routine inspections are performed by two NRC 

Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant and by inspection specialists from the Region III Office 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region III 

2443 Warrenville Road 

Lisle IL 60532 
in Lisle, Ill., and the agency’s headquarters in Rockville, Md. Among the areas of plant 

operations currently being inspected are equipment design, fire protection, and radiation 

protection. 

Current performance information for Clinton is available on the NRC Web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/CLIN/clin_chart.html. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
Editorial Note on Part 400
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 400 appear at 78 FR 69289, Nov. 19, 2013.

§ 400.41 General operation of zones; requirements for commencement of operations. ( a ) *In general.* Zones shall be operated by or under the general management of zone grantees, subject to the requirements of the FTZ Act and this part, as well as those of other federal, state and local agencies having jurisdiction over the site(s) and operation(s). Zone grantees shall ensure that the reasonable zone needs of the business community are served by their zones. CBP officials with oversight responsibilities for a port of entry represent the Board with regard to the zones adjacent to the port of entry in question and are responsible for enforcement, including physical security and access requirements, as provided in 19 CFR part 146.
( b ) *Requirements for commencement of operations in a zone.* The following actions are required before operations in a zone may commence: ( 1 ) The grantee shall submit the zone schedule to the Executive Secretary, as provided in § 400.44.
( 2 ) Approval or concurrence from the grantee and approval from CBP, pursuant to 19 CFR part 146, are required prior to the activation of any portion of an approved zone; and
( 3 ) Prior to activation of a zone, the operator shall obtain all necessary permits from federal, state and local authorities, and except as otherwise specified in the Act or this part, shall comply with the requirements of those authorities.
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 255

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to grant

an easement to facilitate access to the Lewis andClark Interpretative Center in Nebraska City,Nebraska.

108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 255

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to grant an easement to facilitate access to the Lewis and Clark Interpretative Center in Nebraska City, Nebraska.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 255 EH

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO GRANT EASEMENT.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior is

3 authorized to grant an easement to Otoe County, Ne4 braska, for the purpose of constructing and maintaining

5 an access road between the Lewis and Clark Interpretive

6 Center in Nebraska City, Nebraska, and each of the fol7 lowing roads:

8 (1) Nebraska State Highway 2.

9 (2) Otoe County Road 67.

10 (b) LOCATION OF ROAD.—The access road referred

11 to in subsection (a) shall not be located, in whole or in

12 part, on private property.

13 SEC. 2. USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS.

14 No funds from the Department of the Interior may

15 be used for design, construction, maintenance, or oper16 ation of the access road referred to in subsection (a) of

17 section 1.

Passed the House of Representatives May 14, 2003.

Attest:

Clerk.
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 20 (Wednesday, January 30, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 475-476]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00272]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Oncology 1-Basic Translational Integrated 
Review Group; Tumor Cell Biology Study Section.
    Date: February 7-8, 2019.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hotel Zoe Fisherman's Wharf, 425 North Point St., San 
Francisco, CA 94113.
    Contact Person: Charles Morrow, MD, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 6202, MSC 7804, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-408-9850, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#92fffde0e0fde5f1e1d2f1e1e0bcfcfbfabcf5fde4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f09d9f82829f879383b0938382de9e9998de979f86">[email protected]</span></a>.


[[Page 476]]


    This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in 
advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of 
December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 24, 2019.
Natasha M. Copeland,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-00272 Filed 1-29-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# L_2022279EN.01003101.xml

| 27.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 279/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 279/31

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 126/2019

of 8 May 2019

amending Annex XI (Electronic communication, audiovisual services and information society) to the EEA Agreement [2022/2023]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/235 of 24 January 2019 on amending Decision 2008/411/EC as regards an update of relevant technical conditions applicable to the 3 400-3 800 MHz frequency band (1), as corrected by OJ L 92, 1.4.2019, p. 11, is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/235 of 24 January 2019 on amending Decision 2008/411/EC as regards an update of relevant technical conditions applicable to the 3 400-3 800 MHz frequency band (1), as corrected by OJ L 92, 1.4.2019, p. 11, is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 5czd (Commission Decision 2008/411/EC) of Annex XI to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32019 D 0235: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/235 of 24 January 2019 (OJ L 37, 8.2.2019, p. 135), as corrected by OJ L 92, 1.4.2019, p. 11.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32019 D 0235: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/235 of 24 January 2019 (OJ L 37, 8.2.2019, p. 135), as corrected by OJ L 92, 1.4.2019, p. 11.’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/235, as corrected by OJ L 92, 1.4.2019, p. 11, in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 June 2019, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 May 2019.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 37, 8.2.2019, p. 135.

1

(*)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*

---
Board Coverage Decision

2003-19

Employee Service Determination*

No Decision Published
FINDING "SUCCESS" IN RUSSIA

----

**May 1998**
by Steven D. Jones
At your first meeting with your Russian partner, you delivered a powerful, concise pitch about thedeal you'd like to close.  Your partner responded with a forty-five minute presentation on thebackground of his organization, the political situation in Moscow, and the history of the buildingwhere your meeting was held.  The situation was awkward for everyone. Nothing concrete cameof your visit, and now, on your second trip to Moscow, your partner spends twenty minutestalking about your first encounter and still not a word about your proposal.  Your gentle effortsto get things back on track seem to fall on deaf ears.  What's going wrong?  Absolutely nothing.In fact, both sides are genuinely pursuing success as they understand it it's just that Russiansand Americans happen to understand success quite differently.
To be sure, no two Russians, let alone Russians and Americans, are likely to understand successin exactly the same way. Still, we can outline a basic framework that is likely to be shared bymany, if not most, members of each group.  History and  current circumstances strongly shapethese differences,  which are most sharply revealed when we encounter one another.
**Differing Approaches to Business**
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# CY 2011 Metric Report.

Accession Number: ML12037A175

Date Released: Monday, April 9, 2012

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML12037A133 - ROP Annual Performance Metric Report 2011. (3 page(s), 2/6/2012)
    - ML12037A174 - CY 2011 Metric Report. (57 page(s), 2/6/2012)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
|  |  |
|--|--|
|  |
|  |
|  |

|  |  |
|--|--|
#### Joseph Kellner v. Emil Kaufman et al.

Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.; Martin, P. J., taking no part.
#### § 531.411 Continuing evaluation after withholding a within-grade increase.

When a within-grade increase has been withheld, an agency may, at any time thereafter, prepare a new rating of record for the employee and grant the within-grade increase when it determines that he or she has demonstrated sustained performance at an acceptable level of competence. However, the agency shall determine whether the employee's performance is at an acceptable level of competence after no more than 52 calendar weeks following the original eligibility date for the within-grade increase and, for as long as the within-grade increase continues to be denied, determinations will be made after no longer than each 52 calendar weeks.

[51 FR 8421, Mar. 11, 1986]
#### § 8a.100 Purpose and effective date.

The purpose of these Title IX regulations is to effectuate Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (except sections 904 and 906 of those Amendments) (20 U.S.C. 1681, 1682, 1683, 1685, 1686, 1687, 1688), which is designed to eliminate (with certain exceptions) discrimination on the basis of sex in any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance, whether or not such program or activity is offered or sponsored by an educational institution as defined in these Title IX regulations. The effective date of these Title IX regulations shall be September 29, 2000.
NRC SCHEDULES MEETING TO DISCUSS SAFETY 

PERFORMANCE OF HONEYWELL METROPOLIS FACILITY 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a public meeting in Metropolis, 

Ill., on May 3 to discuss its latest evaluation of safety performance at the Honeywell Specialty 

Chemicals plant. The Honeywell plant processes uranium for use in commercial nuclear power 

plant fuel.

The meeting is scheduled to begin at 7 p.m. CDT at the Massac County Courthouse, 

1 Superman Square, in Metropolis. The public can observe the business portion of the meeting 

and NRC staff will be available after that session to answer questions or provide further 

information about NRC oversight of the facility.

 The NRC’s evaluation of Honeywell, called a Licensee Performance Review, covered a 

period beginning Jan. 1, 2011, and ending Dec. 31, 2011. The review covered performance at the 

plant in the areas of Safety Operations, Safeguards, Radiological Controls, Facility Support and 

Special Topics. 

 The review found that Honeywell continued to operate safely and securely and did not 

identify any areas in need of specific improvement. The NRC will also conduct the next review 

over a 24-month period which will end on Dec. 31, 2013. 

 The NRC letter to Honeywell discussing the performance review is available by going to 

the NRC web site at www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html and entering the document 

number ML12073A334.

 

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No: II-12-024

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416 

 April 23, 2012

E-mail: OPA2.Resource@nrc.gov
# Službeni list C 323I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-1088 |
| --- | --- |
| Službeni list
  Europske unije | C 323I |
| | |
| Hrvatsko izdanje | Informacije i objave | Godište 63.1. listopada 2020. |

ISSN 1977-1088

Službeni list

Europske unije

C 323I

Hrvatsko izdanje

Informacije i objave

Godište 63.1. listopada 2020.

---

| Sadržaj | Stranica |
| --- | --- |
| | IV.   Obavijesti |
| | OBAVIJESTI INSTITUCIJA, TIJELA, UREDA I AGENCIJA EUROPSKE UNIJE |
| | Vijeće Europske unije |
| 2020/C 323 I/01 | Odluka Vijeća od 29. rujna 2020. o donošenju stajališta Vijeća o nacrtu općeg proračuna Europske unije za financijsku godinu 2021. | 1 |

Sadržaj

Stranica

IV.   Obavijesti

OBAVIJESTI INSTITUCIJA, TIJELA, UREDA I AGENCIJA EUROPSKE UNIJE

Vijeće Europske unije

2020/C 323 I/01

Odluka Vijeća od 29. rujna 2020. o donošenju stajališta Vijeća o nacrtu općeg proračuna Europske unije za financijsku godinu 2021.

1

---

| HR | |
| --- | --- |

HR

---

IV. Obavijesti

OBAVIJESTI INSTITUCIJA, TIJELA, UREDA I AGENCIJA EUROPSKE UNIJE

Vijeće Europske unije

| 1.10.2020 | HR | Službeni list Europske unije | CI 323/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2020

HR

Službeni list Europske unije

CI 323/1

---

ODLUKA VIJEĆA

od 29. rujna 2020.

o donošenju stajališta Vijeća o nacrtu općeg proračuna Europske unije za financijsku godinu 2021.

(2020/C 323 I/01)

VIJEĆE EUROPSKE UNIJE,

uzimajući u obzir Ugovor o funkcioniranju Europske unije, a posebno njegov članak 314. stavak 3., u vezi s Ugovorom o osnivanju Europske zajednice za atomsku energiju, a posebno njegovim člankom 106.a,

budući da:

| 1. | Komisija je 27. srpnja 2020. podnijela prijedlog koji sadrži nacrt općeg proračuna Europske unije za financijsku godinu 2021. (1), |
| --- | --- |

1.

Komisija je 27. srpnja 2020. podnijela prijedlog koji sadrži nacrt općeg proračuna Europske unije za financijsku godinu 2021. (1),

| 2. | Vijeće je razmotrilo prijedlog Komisije s ciljem utvrđivanja stajališta sukladnog, na prihodovnoj strani, s Odlukom Vijeća 2014/335/EU, Euratom od 26. svibnja 2014. o sustavu vlastitih sredstava Europske unije (2) i, na rashodovnoj strani, s Nacrtom uredbe Vijeća (EU, Euratom) kojom se uspostavlja višegodišnji financijski okvir za razdoblje 2021. – 2027. koji je Coreper općenito odobrio 29. srpnja 2020. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Vijeće je razmotrilo prijedlog Komisije s ciljem utvrđivanja stajališta sukladnog, na prihodovnoj strani, s Odlukom Vijeća 2014/335/EU, Euratom od 26. svibnja 2014. o sustavu vlastitih sredstava Europske unije (2) i, na rashodovnoj strani, s Nacrtom uredbe Vijeća (EU, Euratom) kojom se uspostavlja višegodišnji financijski okvir za razdoblje 2021. – 2027. koji je Coreper općenito odobrio 29. srpnja 2020.

ODLUČILO JE:

Jedini članak

Vijeće je 29. rujna 2020. donijelo stajalište Vijeća o nacrtu općeg proračuna Europske unije za financijsku godinu 2021.

Cjeloviti tekst dostupan je za čitanje ili preuzimanje na internetskim stranicama Vijeća: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/.

Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 29. rujna 2020.

Za Vijeće

Predsjednik

M. ROTH

---

(1)  COM(2020) 300 final.

1

(2)  SL L 168, 7.6.2014., str. 105.

2

---
#### Helen Porte, Respondent, v. Raphael Porte, Appellant, and Anna Turkel, Corespondent.

Defendant is entitled to be advised in advance of the trial of all material factors with respect to the alleged expenditures for necessaries, the amounts and by whom such sums were advanced. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
§ 716.3 Consent to inspections; warrants for inspections. ( a ) The owner, operator, occupant or agent in charge of a facility may consent to an initial or routine inspection. The individual giving consent on behalf of the facility represents that he or she has the authority to make this decision for the facility.
( b ) In instances where consent is not provided by the owner, operator, occupant or agent in charge for an initial or routine inspection, BIS will seek administrative warrants as provided by the Act.
No. IV-09-004 

Contact: Victor Dricks 

Phone: (817) 860-8128 

 

 March 12, 2009 

E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

NRC ISSUES CONFIRMATORY ORDER TO MATTINGLY TESTING SERVICES 

 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a Confirmatory Order to Mattingly 

Testing Services, Inc. of Molt, Mont., to take corrective actions designed to improve compliance 

with NRC regulations for the possession and use of radioactive materials. 

 Mattingly has agreed to the terms and conditions of the Confirmatory Order that requires it 

to take a number of actions including: (1) hiring an independent consultant to evaluate the 

effectiveness of its radiation safety and compliance programs, (2) hiring an independent consultant 

to provide training, (3) improving procedures, (4) improving Mattingly’s disciplinary program, and 

(5) paying a civil penalty in the amount of $8,000. In addition, the company’s president/radiation 

safety officer has agreed not to participate in any NRC-licensed activities for two years. Mattingly 

has already implemented many corrective actions designed to prevent recurrence. 

 The terms of the Confirmatory Order were agreed to following Alternative Dispute 

Resolution, which uses a neutral mediator with no decision-making authority to assist the NRC and 

its licensees in resolving differences regarding enforcement actions. 

 The actions stemmed from an NRC inspection and investigation initiated in 2007 that 

identified nine apparent violations of NRC regulations, including failure by company officials to 

provide complete and accurate information to the NRC staff; failure by a worker to wear a personal 

dosimeter while performing radiographic operations; and failure to remove from service a device 

containing radioactive materials after its locking mechanism sustained damage. 

 Copies of the Confirmatory Order issued by the NRC to Mattingly are available on the NRC 

web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. 

 ### 

 

 NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. 

E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125 

Telephone: (817) 860-8128
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0466

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

vs. 

CHRISTOPHER HORN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including January 15, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 8 2023

12/08/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0466