alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. IV-12-002

Contact: Victor Dricks (817) 200-1128

 Lara Uselding (817) 200-1519

 

January 9, 2012

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

NRC ISSUES $13,500 FINE AND CONFIRMATORY ORDER TO ACCURATE NDE & 

INSPECTION; BARS INDIVIDUAL FROM LICENSED ACTIVITIES FOR ONE YEAR

Accurate NDE & Inspection of Broussard, La., has agreed to make changes to its training 

and record-keeping programs under an agreement with the NRC that includes a $13,500 civil 

penalty. The company uses radioactive materials for non-destructive testing and inspection 

activities.

The NRC conducted an inspection of the company’s licensed activities in response to an 

event that occurred on March 15, 2010, when a company employee using an x-ray camera

attempted to retrieve a sealed capsule containing a small quantity of radioactive Iridium-192 that 

detached from a metal cable on an offshore oil platform in the Gulf of Mexico. The small capsule 

is attached to a metal cable that is unwound and used to take X-ray photographs for inspection 

purposes.

The employee attempted to retrieve the disconnected capsule without notifying the 

radiation safety officer as required by NRC and State of Louisiana regulations. As a result, the 

capsule fell into the Gulf of Mexico where it was lost.

The NRC identified five apparent violations of NRC requirements documented in a 

July 28, 2011 inspection report. The company chose to resolve the matter using the agency’s 

alternative dispute resolution process in which a neutral mediator assists parties in reaching an 

agreement.

As a result, the company has agreed to pay a $13,500 civil penalty; establish a 

comprehensive training program designed to deter future willful violations of NRC regulations; 

and use an independent third party to verify the effectiveness of its training programs for new 

and existing employees.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV

 1600 E. Lamar Blvd.

 Arlington, TX 76011-4511

Telephone: (817) 860-8100

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov
The NRC also issued an Order barring the individual involved in this incident from any 

NRC-licensed activities for a period of one year. An NRC investigation found he had engaged in 

deliberate misconduct by attempting to retrieve the capsule without making the required 

notifications.

Copies of the Orders will be posted on the NRC’s web site.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 222 (Thursday, November 18, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 67617]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25635]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 4872]


Notice of Meeting; United States International Telecommunication 
Advisory Committee Information Meeting on the World Summit on the 
Information Society

    The Department of State announces a meeting of the U.S. 
International Telecommunication Advisory Committee (ITAC). The purpose 
of the Committee is to advise the Department on matters related to 
telecommunication and information policy matters in preparation for 
international meetings pertaining to telecommunication and information 
issues.
    The ITAC will meet to discuss the matters related to the second 
phase of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS). The 
meeting will take place on Wednesday, December 8, 2004 from 10:30 a.m. 
to 12 p.m. in the lecture room of the Historic National Academy of 
Science Building. The National Academy of Sciences is located at 2100 C 
St. NW., Washington, DC.
    Members of the public are welcome to participate and may join in 
the discussions, subject to the discretion of the Chair. Persons 
planning to attend this meeting should send the following data by fax 
to (202) 647-5957 or e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a3c9cacfcfd0cccdc2c7e3d0d7c2d7c68dc4ccd5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ee848782829d81808f8aae9d9a8f9a8bc0898198">[email protected]</span></a> not later than 24 
hours before the meeting: (1) Name of the meeting, (2) your name, and 
(3) organizational affiliation. A valid photo ID must be presented to 
gain entrance to the National Academy of Sciences Building. Directions 
to the meeting location may be obtained by calling the ITAC Secretariat 
at 202 647-5205 or e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1b717277776874757a7f5b686f7a6f7e357c746d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="046e6d6868776b6a65604477706570612a636b72">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: November 4, 2004.
Anne Jillson,
Foreign Affairs Officer, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 04-25635 Filed 11-17-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-07-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### [§312. Repealed. Pub. L. 111–8, div. D, title V, §518(c)(1), Mar. 11, 2009, 123 Stat. 665]

Section, Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1073, related to transfer and use of amounts for major equipment acquisitions.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6719

ANTHONY D. HARRIS, SR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND; JON P. GALLEY, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-00-3750-WMN) Submitted: June 21, 2001 Decided: July 5, 2001 Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony D. Harris, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Celia Anderson Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Anthony D. Harris, Sr. seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Harris v. Attorney General MD , No. CA-00-3750-WMN (D. Md. Apr. 17, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 9001.102 Definitions.

For purposes of this part, the term:

*Affiliate* means any entity that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with another entity.

*Designated Agency Ethics Official,* or *DAEO,* as also used in 5 CFR part 2635, and “alternate DAEO” mean the individuals so designated by the Director, FHFA. The DAEO is responsible for designating agency ethics officials and ethics designees, as such terms are used in 5 CFR part 2635. The alternate DAEO acts as the DAEO in the DAEO's absence.

*Director* means the Director of FHFA or his or her designee.

*Employee* means an officer or employee of FHFA, including a special Government employee. For purposes of this part, it also means an individual on detail from another agency to FHFA for a period of more than 30 calendar days.

*Enterprise* means the Federal National Mortgage Association or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation.

*Federal Home Loan Bank* or *Bank* means a Bank established under the Federal Home Loan Bank Act; the term “Federal Home Loan Banks” means, collectively, all the Federal Home Loan Banks.

*Federal Home Loan Bank System* means the Federal Home Loan Banks under the supervision of the Federal Housing Finance Agency.

*Regulated entity* means the Federal National Mortgage Association and any affiliate thereof; the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and any affiliate thereof; or any Federal Home Loan Bank; the term “regulated entities” means, collectively, the Federal National Mortgage Association and any affiliate thereof; the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and any affiliate thereof; and the Federal Home Loan Banks.

*Safety and Soundness Act* means the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 (12 U.S.C. 4501 *et seq.*), as amended by the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (HERA), Public Law 110-289, 122 Stat. 2654 (2008).

*Security* means all interests in debt or equity instruments. The term includes, without limitation, secured and unsecured bonds, debentures, notes, securitized assets and commercial paper including loans securitized by mortgages or deeds of trust and securities backed by such instruments, as well as all types of preferred and common stock. The term encompasses current and contingent ownership interests including any beneficial or legal interest derived from a trust. Such interest includes any right to acquire or dispose of any long or short position in such securities and also includes, without limit, interests convertible into such securities, as well as options, rights, warrants, puts, calls and straddles with respect thereto. The term shall not, however, be construed to include deposit accounts, such as checking, savings, or money market deposit accounts.
#### Edward A. Currie *v.*Louis Marano et al.

*William C. Franklin,*in support of the petition.

*Richard Bruno,*in opposition.

Decided April 5, 1988

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 13 Conn. App. 527, is denied.
§ 843.306 Basic benefits on death of a non-disability retiree. ( a ) Except as provided in §§ 843.307 and 843.312, and paragraph (b) of this section, if an annuitant dies and is survived by a current spouse, the current spouse is entitled to a current spouse annuity equal to 50 percent of an annuity computed under subpart D of part 842 of this chapter, with respect to the retiree, unless— ( 1 ) The right to a current spouse annuity was waived under § 842.603 of this chapter (and no election was subsequently made under § 842.610 of this chapter nullifying the waiver); or
( 2 ) In the case of a marriage after retirement, the retiree did not file an election under § 842.612 of this chapter.
( b ) A current spouse who married the retiree after retirement is entitled to an annuity under paragraph (a) of this section only upon electing this annuity instead of any other survivor benefit to which such spouse may be entitled under this subpart, subpart B of this part, or under another retirement system for Government employees.
[52 FR 2074, Jan. 16, 1987, as amended at 52 FR 23014, June 17, 1987]
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-12-0112 - Policy Statement on Agreement State Programs

Accession Number: ML12110A187

Date Released: Friday, April 29, 2022

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML12110A183 - SECY-12-0112 - Policy Statement on Agreement State Programs (7 page(s), 8/14/2012)
    - ML12202B165 - Enclosure 1: Adequacy and Compatibility of Agreement State Programs_redlinestrikeout (7 page(s), 8/14/2012)
    - ML12202B157 - Enclosure 2: Statement of Principles and Policy for the Agreement State Program_redlinestrikeout (12 page(s), 8/14/2012)
    - ML12165A179 - Enclosure 3: Dissenting Opinion for Changes Made to the Policy Statement on Adequacy and Compatibility (2 page(s), 8/14/2012)
    - ML12110A200 - Enclosure 4: FRN for the Adequacy and Compatibility Policy Statement Draft Revisions (38 page(s), 8/14/2012)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
### §5007. Free transportation of postal employees

(a) Each person or carrier engaged in the transportation of mail shall carry on any vessel, train, motor vehicle, or aircraft he operates, upon exhibiting their credentials and without extra charge therefor, persons on duty in charge of the mails or when traveling to and from such duty.

(b)(1) In this subsection, "air carrier" and "aircraft" have the same meanings given those terms in section 40102(a) of title 49.

(2) An air carrier engaged in transporting mail shall carry without charge on any plane it operates those agents and officers of the Postal Service traveling on official business related to transporting mail by aircraft, as prescribed by regulations of the Secretary of Transportation, on exhibiting credentials.

(Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 768; Pub. L. 103–272, §4(g)(1), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1364.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–272 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsec. (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1971, pursuant to Resolution No. 71–9 of the Board of Governors. See section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note preceding section 101 of this title.
### §5712. Validity of affidavits

Any such oath, affirmation, affidavit, or examination, when certified under the hand of any such employee by whom it was administered or taken and authenticated by the seal of the Department, may be offered or used in any court of the United States and without further proof of the identity or authority of such employee shall have like force and effect as if administered or taken before a clerk of such court.

(Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1237, §3312; renumbered §5712, Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §402(b)(1), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 238; Pub. L. 102–83, §4(a)(3), (4), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 404.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–40 renumbered section 3312 of this title as this section.

Pub. L. 102–83 substituted "Department" for "Veterans' Administration".
### [§8169. Repealed. Pub. L. 117–168, title VII, §705(d), Aug. 10, 2022, 136 Stat. 1800]

Section, added Pub. L. 102–86, title IV, §401(a), Aug. 14, 1991, 105 Stat. 422; amended Pub. L. 103–452, title I, §103(d), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4786; Pub. L. 104–110, title I, §101(k), Feb. 13, 1996, 110 Stat. 769; Pub. L. 105–114, title II, §205(a), Nov. 21, 1997, 111 Stat. 2288; Pub. L. 106–117, title II, §208(e), Nov. 30, 1999, 113 Stat. 1568; Pub. L. 112—154, title II, §211(j), Aug. 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 1182, provided that the authority of the Secretary to enter into enhanced-use leases under this subchapter would expire on Dec. 31, 2023.
EXHIBIT 99.2


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Performance Capital
Management, LLC (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Edward M. Rucker, Accounting Manager of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
18  U.S.C.  (section)  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  (section)  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that,  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


                                          /s/  Edward M. Rucker
                                          ---------------------
                                          Edward M. Rucker
                                          Accounting Manager
                                          April 24, 2003


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  be  deemed  filed by the Company for purposes of
Section  18  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended.


<PAGE>
ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD TO HEAR ORAL ARGUMENT 

SEPT. 30 REGARDING CROW BUTTE LICENSE RENEWAL 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB) will 

hear oral arguments Sept. 30 and Oct. 1 in Chadron, Neb., regarding the application of Crow 

Butte Resources, Inc., to renew its license for its in-situ leach uranium recovery facility in 

Crawford, Neb. 

 The Oglala Sioux Tribe, the Oglala Delegation of the Great Sioux Nation Treaty Council, 

the Western Nebraska Resource Council and several individuals have petitioned to intervene in 

the license renewal proceeding. The oral arguments will address the standing of these potential 

parties to intervene and the admissibility of their various environmental and technical 

contentions. 

 The oral arguments will be held in the Chicoine Atrium of the Mari Sandoz High Plains 

Heritage Center, Chadron State College, 1000 Main St. in Chadron. They will begin at 9:00 a.m. 

on Sept. 30 and will carry over into Oct. 1 as necessary. 

The ASLB Panel is the independent trial-level adjudicatory body of the NRC. Acting on 

behalf of the Commission and independent of the agency staff, individual Licensing Boards 

conduct public hearings concerning contested issues that arise in the course of licensing and 

enforcement proceedings regarding nuclear reactors and the civilian use of nuclear materials in 

the United States. 

Licensing Boards typically consist of three administrative judges; in this proceeding, the 

board includes two technical experts and an attorney, with a second attorney serving as a special 

assistant to the board. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-176 Sept. 22, 2008
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-2185
JEFFREY THOMAS FARMER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MICHAEL V. HAYDEN; NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District Court of Columbia, at Washington, D.C. James Robertson, District Judge. (05-MC-314-JR) Submitted: January 19, 2006 Decided: January 24, 2006 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeffrey Thomas Farmer, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Jeffrey Thomas Farmer filed a notice of appeal in the District Court for the District of Columbia and requested the appeal be transferred to this Court. Because Farmer is not appealing a final order or judgment emanating from a court over which this court has jurisdiction, we are without jurisdiction. Accordingly, we deny Farmer’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Richard Slack, Appellee, v. Milwaukee-Mechanics Insurance Company, Appellant.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Appeal from the City Court of Bast St. Louis; the Hon. William B. Hadley, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the October term, 1913.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed May 1, 1914.

Statement of the Case.

Action by Bichará Slack against Milwaukee-Mechanics Insurance Company on a fire insurance policy issued to plaintiff on the contents of a six-room dwelling house. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, for seven hundred and fifty dollars, defendant appeals.

Plaintiff had four one thousand dollars insurance policies on the contents of the house in four different companies and being unable to effect a settlement brought suit against the respective companies. In a suit against the Security Insurance Company plaintiff recovered a judgment for seven hundred and seventy-five dollars, but on appeal to the Appellate Court the judgment was reversed and the cause remanded. *Security Ins. Co. v. Slack,*183 Ill. App. 579. The pleadings in that case and the present one appear to be identical and the evidence much the same except in some minor particulars. The decision in the former case is controlling on some of the questions raised in the present case, and reference must be had to the opinion in that case for the decision on those questions.

E. P. Peers and E. P. Holly, for appellant.

Webb *&*Webb, for appellee.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice Higbee

delivered the opinion of the court.

*566Abstract of the Decision.

1. Insurance, § *699*
      ***
      *—when refusal of requested instruction improper.*In an action on a fire insurance policy, refusal of a requested instruction that the insurance company would not be liable for loss or damage to the goods other than that arising from the fire resulting from plaintiff not being permitted by the police and fire department to take possession of the goods after the fire, *held*error, the policy insuring only against direct loss or damage by fire and providing that the insurer shall not be liable for loss caused directly or indirectly by order of any civil authorities.

2. Insurance, § *636*
      ***
      *—admissibility of insured’s list of property destroyed.*A copy of the list of articles made out and furnished the adjuster by the insured may be used by the insured to refresh his recollection when testifying as to what articles were destroyed, but where the list has the value of each article placed opposite the same it should not be permitted to go to the jury.

3. Insurance, § *426*
      ***
      *—amount of recovery for loss by fire.*Where a fire policy limits the liability of the insurer to the actual cash value of the property at the time of loss to be ascertained with proper deductions for depreciations however caused, the insured is not entitled to recover the cost price of the articles when new, it appearing that the articles had been used for one or more
#### Robert McMillan Barrow, Appellant, v. Constance Barrow, Respondent.

(Appeal No. 1.)

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Jenks, P, J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.