alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on October 22, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), the Joint Venture under ATP Award No. 70NANB4H3044 (“ATP JV”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties are Sarnoff Corporation, Princeton, NJ; Autoliv ASP, Inc., Auburn Hills, MI; and Ford Motor Company, Dearborn, MI. The general area of ATP JV's planned activity is active automotive safety through a novel fusion of vision and radar sensors that will identify and evaluate impending collisions in time to take advance action.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-25868  Filed 11-19-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
### §4707. Remission of liquidated damages

When a contract made on behalf of the Federal Government by the head of a Federal agency, or by an authorized officer of the agency, includes a provision for liquidated damages for delay, the Secretary of the Treasury on recommendation of the head of the agency may remit any part of the damages as the Secretary of the Treasury believes is just and equitable.

(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3799.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 4707 | 41:256a. | Sept. 5, 1950, ch. 849, §10(a), 64 Stat. 591; Pub. L. 104–316, title II, §202(u), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3845. |

Section
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-50413 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JAVIER HUGO GUEVARA-MARISCAL, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-00-CR-1998-ALL-H

-------------------- October 29, 2001 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Javier Hugo Guevara-Mariscal appeals the 57-month term of imprisonment imposed following his guilty plea conviction of attempting to illegally reenter the United States after removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Guevara-Mariscal complains that his sentence was enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2), which allowed the court to impose up to a twenty-year term of imprisonment because he was removed after being convicted of an aggravated felony. Guevara-Mariscal argues that the sentencing provision violates the Due Process Clause because it permittedNo. 01-50413 -2- the sentencing judge to find, under a preponderance of the evidence standard, a fact which increased the statutory maximumsentence to which he otherwise would have been exposed. GuevaraMariscal thus contends that his sentence is invalid and argues that it should not exceed the two-year maximum term of imprisonment prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Guevara-Mariscal acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). GuevaraMariscal’s argument is foreclosed. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
§ 904.304 Opportunity for hearing. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the recipient of a NOPS or NIDP will be provided an opportunity for a hearing, as governed by § 904.201.
( b ) There will be no opportunity for a hearing to contest a NOPS or NIDP if the permit holder/applicant had a previous opportunity to participate as a party in an administrative or judicial proceeding with respect to the violation that forms the basis for the NOPS or NIDP, whether or not the permit holder/applicant did participate, and whether or not such a proceeding was held.
[71 FR 12448, Mar. 10, 2006, as amended at 87 FR 38941, June 30, 2022]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-20168

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CARLOS PAUL GONZALEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:08-CR-76-1

Before REAVLEY, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Carlos Paul Gonzalez, federal prisoner # 82609-179, pleaded guilty to 

one count of conspiring to commit mail and wire fraud and was sentenced to 

135 months of imprisonment. He did not file a direct appeal. The district court 

dismissed his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 as barred by the waiver contained 

in Gonzalez’s plea agreement. Subsequently, Gonzalez filed a motion 

requesting that the district court judge recuse himself and a motion for a 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 25, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-20168 Document: 00514570729 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/25/2018
No. 17-20168

2

default judgment. The district court found that there were no proceedings 

pending before the court from which the district judge could recuse himself or 

from which the Government could be in default and denied the motions. 

Gonzalez appeals the denial of the motion to recuse.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 455(a), a justice, judge, or magistrate of the United 

States is required to recuse himself “in any proceeding in which his 

impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” Section 455(b) requires that he 

recuse himself in other specified circumstances, including proceedings where

he is personally biased. If “a judge’s partiality might reasonably be questioned, 

recusal is required under § 455(a),” even if the circumstance is not covered by 

§ 455(b). Andrade v. Chojnacki, 338 F.3d 448, 454 (5th Cir. 2003). As there 

was nothing pending before the district court when Gonzalez filed his motion 

for recusal, there was no proceeding from which the district court judge could 

recuse himself under § 455. Accordingly, Gonzalez’s recusal motion was 

unauthorized and meaningless. See United States v. Early, 27 F.3d 140, 142 

(5th Cir. 1994).

Gonzalez’s motions to expedite his appeal, for extraordinary relief, and 

for oral argument are denied.

AFFIRMED; MOTIONS DENIED.

 Case: 17-20168 Document: 00514570729 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/25/2018
### **CHAPTER 65—CONTRACTS FOR MATERIALS, SUPPLIES, ARTICLES, AND EQUIPMENT EXCEEDING $10,000**

Sec.
6501.
Definitions.
6502.
Required contract terms.
6503.
Breach or violation of required contract terms.
6504.
Three-year prohibition on new contracts in case of breach or violation.
6505.
Exclusions.
6506.
Administrative provisions.
6507.
Hearing authority and procedures.
6508.
Authority to make exceptions.
6509.
Other procedures.
6510.
Manufacturers and regular dealers.
6511.
Effect on other law.
# L_2023164EN.01003401.xml

| 29.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 164/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 164/34

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 309/2022

of 9 December 2022

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2023/1251]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/692 of 16 February 2022 amending, for the purposes of its adaptation to technical and scientific progress, Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (1), as corrected by OJ L 146, 25.5.2022, p. 150, is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/692 of 16 February 2022 amending, for the purposes of its adaptation to technical and scientific progress, Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (1), as corrected by OJ L 146, 25.5.2022, p. 150, is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 12zze (Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘- | 32022 R 0692: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/692 of 16 February 2022 (OJ L 129, 3.5.2022, p. 1), as corrected by OJ L 146, 25.5.2022, p. 150.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘-

32022 R 0692: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/692 of 16 February 2022 (OJ L 129, 3.5.2022, p. 1), as corrected by OJ L 146, 25.5.2022, p. 150.’

Article 2

The text of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/692, as corrected by OJ L 146, 25.5.2022, p. 150, in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 10 December 2022, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 9 December 2022.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kristján Andri STEFÁNSSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 129, 3.5.2022, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Program 

Letter

United States 

Railroad Retirement Board 

Office of Programs

Quality Reporting Service Center 

e-mail: QRSC@RRB.GOV

Phone: (312) 751-4992

 Fax: (312) 751-7190

Letter No. 2003-03 Date: 01/31/2003 

TO: Certification Contact Officials 

SUBJECT: Service & Compensation Reporting Instructions for Canadian Employees Only 

Background The Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) has experienced difficulties in 

recording and documenting earnings data for Canadian employees who reside 

in Canada but perform service in the United States (US) covered under the 

Railroad Retirement Act (RRA) or the Railroad Unemployment Insurance 

Act (RUIA). The problem exists because Canadian employees cannot receive 

Social Security Numbers (SSN) due to regulation changes by the Immigration 

& Naturalization Service in 1997. 

To reconcile this issue the RRB has developed and implemented special 

reporting instructions so employers can uniformly report annual service and 

compensation for Canadian employees to the RRB. 

 

Purpose This letter is to remind Canadian employers how to complete Form BA-3a: 

Annual Report of Creditable Compensation & Form G-440: Report 

Specifications Sheet for Canadian employees who do not have a SSN. 

Continued on next page 
Continued, 

 

Form BA-3a 

Instructions 

Take the following action when completing a tape, cd-rom or floppy disk 

Form Ba-3a, Annual Report of Creditable Compensation : 

• Enter the payroll ID in positions 9-18. 

• Enter the Canadian Social Insurance Number (SIN) in positions 19-27. 

• Enter **** in positions 74-77 to indicate that this is a Canadian without a 

U.S. Social Security Number. 

 

Form G-440 

Instructions 

Complete all sections of the G-440, Report Specifications Sheet in the usual 

manner. Enter the following statement in the remarks section of the Form 

G-440 in Red ink: “Report Includes Canadian Social Insurance Numbers”. 

 

 

Special Note Canadian employee records may be submitted on a separate Form BA-3a 

tape, cd-rom or diskette or as part of the regular annual report. 

 

Questions If you have any questions or concerns about this letter, you may contact a 

Compensation Specialist by e-mail at QRSC@RRB.GOV or by telephone at 

(312) 751-4992.
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Mortgagebrokers.com Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof  (the “Report”), I, Alex Haditaghi, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| 1.     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                |
| 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |

 
| By:    | */s/*   *Alex Haditaghi*

ALEX HADITAGHIChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer
Dated: August 22, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

  |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Cell Biology Integrated Review Group; Molecular and Integrative Signal Transduction Study Section.                    

*Date:*                         February 7-8, 2019.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Torrance Marriott Redondo Beach, 3635 Fashion Way, Torrance, Torrance, CA 90503.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Charles Selden, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5187, MSC 7840, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-451-3388,                         *seldens@mail.nih.gov*.                    

This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 25, 2019.

Sylvia L. Neal,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2019-00330 Filed 1-30-19; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
December 12 , 2013

A. Stanley Meiburg, PhD

Acting Regional Administrator

US EPA Region 4

Atlanta Federal Center

61 Forsyth Street, SW

Atlanta, GA 30303

- 8909

Re: South Carolina Recommendation for Fine Particulate Matter Boundary Designations

Dear Dr

. Meiburg :

I am writing this letter in response to the United States Environmental Protection Age n cy’s (EPA)

r e quest to submit boundary recommendations for the revised fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) National A mbient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) es tablished by EPA via 78 Federal Register 3086, January 1

, 2013

.

The Clean Air Act Section 107(d ) ( l) provides that, "By such date as the Administrator may re aso na bly require, but not later than one year after promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS for any po l l utant u n der section 109, the Governor of each s tate shall submit to the Administrator a list of all areas (or

po r tions thereof) in the s tate that should be designated as nonattainment, a t tainment, or unc lassifiable for

the new NAAQS..

. ” A ccordingly, Govern ors must submit their initial PM de s ignation recommendations

to the EPA no later than December 13, 2013

, (7 8 FR 3086 ).

Based on the attached ambient air monitoring data, I am pleased to report that South Carolina fu lly c o m plies with the revised fine particulat e matter standard. On behalf of Governor Nikki R. H a ley, I am

re c o m mend ing that each county in the State of South Carolina be separately desi g na ted as “attainment”

for the revised primary PM 2.5 NAAQS.

Should you have any questions regarding our recomme ndation, please contact Myra Reece,

Chief, B u reau of Air Quality, at (803) 898

- 4123 or by email at reecemc@dhec.sc.gov

.

Sincerely,

Catherine B. Templeton

cc: Elizabeth A. Dieck, D irector

, Environmental Affairs , SCDHEC

Myra C. Reece, Chief, Bureau of Air Quality, SCDHEC

Attachment : South Carolina Annual PM 2.5 Design Values

– 2012South Carolina Annual PM 2.5 NAAQS Design Values

– 2012

Site ID Site Name 2010

Weighted

Arithmeti c

A v erage (μg/m 3 ) 2011

Weighted

Arithmetic

A v erage (μg/m 3 ) 2012

Weighted

Arithmetic

A v erage (μg/m 3 ) 2010

-

2012

Design

Value

(μg/m 3 ) Design

Value

Valid?

45

- 019

- 0048 FAA Tower 9.2 * 10.2 8.5 9.3 No

45

- 019

- 0049 Charleston

Public

Works 9.4 9.7 7.7 8.9 Ye s

45

- 019

- 0051 Howard

Heights 9.3 * * 9.3 No

45

- 025

- 0001 Chesterfield 10.2 9.5 8.2 * 9.3 No

45

- 037

- 0001 Trenton 10.3 10.4 8.9 9.8 Yes

45

- 041

- 0003 Williams 10.9 11.1 9.2 10.4 Yes

45

- 045

- 0009 Taylors 11.2 10.9 * 9.8 10.6 No

45

- 045

- 0015 Gree nville

ESC 11.8 11.0 9.9 10.9 Yes

45

- 045

- 0016 Hillcrest

* 10.5 9.3 9.9 No

45

- 063

- 0008 Irmo 11.6 11.6 10.0 11.1 Yes

45

- 073

- 0001 Long Creek 8.6 * * 8.6 No

45

- 079

- 0007 Parklane 10.7 10.6 9.0 10.1 Yes

45

- 079

- 0019 Bates

House,

USC 11.1 11.4 * 9.7 10.7 No

45

- 083

- 0011 Gregg 11.4 11.0 9.8 10.7 Yes

Note: Annual averages not meeting completeness criteria are marked with “*”
#### § 786.3 Destruction or disposal of records.

If BIS or any other authorized U.S. government agency makes a formal or informal request for a certain record or records, such record or records may not be destroyed or disposed of without the written authorization of the requesting entity.
#### § 231.114 Secretary.

*Secretary* means the Secretary of Commerce or the Secretary's designees.
Editorial Note on Part 20
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear at 68 FR 51355, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 20.5 Exceptions to the rules. ( a ) *Normal operations or statutory objective of any program or activity.* A recipient is permitted to take an action otherwise prohibited by § 20.4 if the action reasonably considers age as a factor necessary to the normal operation or the achievement of any statutory objective of a program or activity. An action meets this standard if: ( 1 ) Age is used as a measure or approximation of one or more other characteristics; and
( 2 ) The other characteristic(s) must be measured or approximated in order for the normal operation of the program or activity to continue, or to achieve any statutory objective or the program or activity; and
( 3 ) The other characteristic(s) can be reasonably measured or approximated by the use of age; and
( 4 ) The other characteristic(s) are impractical to measure directly on an individual bases.
( b ) *Reasonable factors other than age.* A recipient is permitted to take an action otherwise prohibited by § 20.4 which is based on a factor other than age, even though that action may have a disproportionate effect on persons of different ages. An action may be based on a factor other than age only if the factor bears a direct and substantial relationship to the normal operation of the program or activity or to the achievement of a statutory objective.