alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 13.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Fibria Celulose S.A. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, João Adalberto Elek Júnior, Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(i)            the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| By:    | /s/ João Adalberto Elek Júnior                        |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name João Adalberto Elek Júnior                       |   |
|   | Title: Chief   Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer |   |

 

Dated: September 2, 2011

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
##### 



RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD CERTIFICATE June 12, 2003 Exhibit 10.62 Richard A. Young
219 Winchester Beach Drive
Annapolis, MD 21401 USA Dear Richard: Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the TeleCommunication Systems, Inc.
Amended & Restated 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (the Plan), you have been
granted a Restricted Stock Award (the Award) for the number of shares (each
an Award Share, and collectively, the Award Shares) of the Class A common
stock, par value $0.01 per share (the Common Stock) of TeleCommunication
Systems, Inc. (the Company) as outlined below. This Certificate constitutes
part of and is subject to the terms and provisions of the attached Restricted
Stock Grant Agreement (the Agreement) which is incorporated herein by
reference. Granted To: Richard A. Young     
(the Employee)
Grant Date: April 14, 2003
Award Shares Granted: 90,000
Vesting Schedule: 3-year Vesting 30,000 on 04/14/2004
30,000 on 04/14/2005
30,000 on 04/14/2006 By my signature below, I hereby acknowledge receipt of this Award granted on
the Grant Date shown above, which has been issued to me under the terms and
conditions of the Agreement and the Plan. I understand that I will forfeit all
unvested Award Shares at the close of business on my last day of employment at
TCS. I further acknowledge receipt of the Plan Prospectus and the latest annual
report or other SEC filing, and agree to be bound by all of the terms and
conditions of the Award, as evidenced in the Agreement, and the Plan. Signature: /s/ Richard A. Young
    
    Date: ________________Richard A. Young
 Note: If there are any discrepancies in the name or address shown above, please
make the appropriate corrections on this form.
Presidential Documents

67631

Federal Register 

Vol. 69, No. 222

Thursday, November 18, 2004

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 7846 of November 15, 2004

America Recycles Day, 2004

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation

Our Nation is dedicated to good stewardship of our natural resources. On 

America Recycles Day, we reaffirm our commitment to preserving our resources and recycling. 

Our country produces more than 200 million tons of municipal solid waste—

approximately 4 pounds of waste per person per day. As more garbage 

is generated, the demands on our landfills, natural resources, and environment continue to grow. Recycling helps conserve energy and natural resources, provides raw materials for key domestic industries, reduces air 

and water pollution, cuts greenhouse gas emissions, and promotes the development of cleaner technologies. Recycling and composting diverts millions 

of tons of material away from landfills and incinerators. Through curbside 

collection and recyclable drop-off centers, communities across our Nation 

are demonstrating their commitment to protecting our environment and to 

building a better future for our next generation. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim November 15, 2004, 

as America Recycles Day. I call upon the people of the United States to 

observe this day with appropriate programs and activities. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fifteenth day 

of November, in the year of our Lord two thousand four, and of the Independ-

[FR Doc. 04–25776

Filed 11–17–04; 9:09 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 

ence of the United States of America the two hundred and twenty-ninth.

W
#### § 781.4 U.S. Government requests for information needed to satisfy the requirements of the APR or the Act.

From time-to-time, one or more U.S. Government agencies (i.e., the Department of Defense, the Department of Energy, the NRC, or BIS) may contact a location to request information that the U.S. Government has determined to be necessary to satisfy certain requirements of the APR or the Act (e.g., clarification requests or vulnerability assessments). If the manner of providing such information is not specified in the APR, the agency in question will provide the location with appropriate instructions.
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-14-0544 SAT Date: 6/20/2014 Print Date: 7/2/2014

Related cases :

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 2

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 2 12

Exposure Based Review : Health: Ecotox: N o Routes of exposure : Health: Drinking Water Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ; Keywords : Keywords: IRR-E,MM,L (UNCERT); DEVEL; AQUATOX Summary of Assessment :
Fate : Fate Summary: P-14-0544 FATE:
log Kow = -1.76 (E) S > 10 g/L at 25 C (E) VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) log Koc = 1.90 (E) log Fish BCF = 0.50 (E) log Fish BAF = -0.04 (E)POTW removal (%) = 0 Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = mo Sorption to soils/sediments = low - moderate PBT Potential: P2B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl-rapid

Health : Health Summary: N ot absorbed from the skin, absorbed from the lung, absorbed from the GI tract ( p che m ). Concern for developmental toxicity based on compounds. Uncertain concern for irritation to eyes, mucous membranes and lungs depending on the pH ( p H range reported to be 7 - 10).

Ecotox : Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 >100 daphnid 48-h LC50 >100 green algal 96-h EC50 14.1 fish

_ chronic value 2.5 daphnid

_ chronic value >10
algal

_ chronic value 3.1
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SAR nearest analog methods for
SAR chemical class = ; MW 107; S > 700 g/L in water at 20 C (P); effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <180.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 250

SARs SAR Class Ecotox Category N one
Ecotox Factors Comments:
SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
### §1209. Applicability of Federal labor laws

(a) Employee-management relations shall, to the extent not inconsistent with provisions of this title, be subject to the provisions of subchapter II of chapter 7 of title 29.

(b) The provisions of chapter 11 of title 29 shall be applicable to labor organizations that have or are seeking to attain recognition under section 1203 of this title, and to such organizations, officers, agents, shop stewards, other representatives, and members to the extent to which such provisions would be applicable if the Postal Service were an employer under section 402 of title 29. In addition to the authority conferred on him under section 438 of title 29, the Secretary of Labor shall have authority, by regulation issued with the written concurrence of the Postal Service, to prescribe simplified reports for any such labor organization. The Secretary of Labor may revoke such provision for simplified forms of any such labor organization if he determines, after such investigation as he deems proper and after due notice and opportunity for a hearing, that the purposes of this chapter and of chapter 11 of title 29 would be served thereby.

(c) Each employee of the Postal Service shall have the right, freely and without fear of penalty or reprisal, to form, join, and assist a labor organization or to refrain from any such activity, and each employee shall be protected in the exercise of this right.

(Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 737.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1971, pursuant to Resolution No. 71–9 of the Board of Governors. See section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note preceding section 101 of this title.
#### § 0.17 Bureau of Consumer Protection.

The Bureau is responsible for enforcing the prohibition against unfair or deceptive acts or practices in section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 45), as well as numerous special statutes that the Commission is charged with enforcing. The Bureau carries out its responsibilities by investigating alleged law violations, recommending to the Commission such further steps as may be appropriate, and prosecuting enforcement actions authorized by the Commission. Such further steps may include seeking injunctive and other relief as permitted by statute in Federal district court; litigating before the agency's administrative law judges; negotiating settlement of complaints; initiating rules or reports; and initiating civil penalty proceedings for rule violations. The Bureau also conducts compliance investigations and, in compliance with Section 16(a)(1) of the FTC Act (15 U.S.C. 56(a)(1)), initiates proceedings for civil penalties to assure compliance with final Commission orders dealing with unfair or deceptive practices. The Bureau participates in trade regulation rulemaking proceedings under section 18(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 57a(a)(1)(B)) and other rulemaking proceedings under statutory authority. In addition, the Bureau seeks to educate both consumers and the business community about the laws it enforces, and to assist and cooperate with other state, local, and international agencies and organizations in consumer protection enforcement and regulatory matters.

[86 FR 38546, July 22, 2021]
NRC TO DISCUSS CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF REGULATION

MAY 31 IN ROCKVILLE, MD

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with interested groups and members of 

the public on Thursday, May 31, in Rockville, Md., to discuss how the agency is considering 

changes to its rulemaking process to reduce implementation challenges for license holders and 

NRC staff. 

The meeting will run from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. EDT in Room T2B3 of NRC Headquarters, 

11555 Rockville Pike in Rockville. Members of the public can also participate in the meeting via 

teleconference and webinar. For information on pre-registering, calling in or participating in the 

webinar, please contact Tara Inverso at 301-415-1024 or tara.inverso@nrc.gov.

The meeting will discuss the concept of “cumulative effects of regulation,” or CER, 

which could occur if the NRC issued several new and complex changes with overlapping 

deadlines and resource needs. The NRC understands CER should be minimized, since it could 

potentially distract both license holders and NRC staff from properly focusing on safety and 

security. The issue has taken on added importance as the agency implements the lessons learned 

from the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear accident.

The meeting is meant to inform the public about the staff’s approach to revising the 

NRC’s rulemaking process to avoid CER, and to allow the public to ask clarifying questions and 

provide feedback. The staff laid out its approach to the CER issue in a proposal to the 

Commission. The staff’s presentation for the meeting is available on the NRC’s electronic 

document database, ADAMS, by searching for accession number ML12123A083.

###

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand.

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 12-054 May 11, 2012
### **CHAPTER 56—TRANSPORTATION OF MAIL BY VESSEL**

Sec.
5601.
Sea post service.
5602.
Termination of contracts for foreign transportation.
5603.
Transportation of mail by vessel as freight or express.
5604.
Fines on ocean carriers.
5605.
Contracts for transportation of mail by vessel.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

          - 26 CFR Part 1 
          - [REG-208246-90] 
          - RIN 1545-BD47 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Cancellation of notice of public hearing on proposed rulemaking. 

# SUMMARY:

This document provides notice of cancellation of a public hearing on proposed regulations relating to the allocation and apportionment of charitable deductions. 

# DATES:

The public hearing originally scheduled for Thursday, December 2, 2004, at 10 a.m., is cancelled. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Treena Garrett of the Publications and Regulations Branch, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration) (202) 622-7180 (not a toll-free number). 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    A notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing that appeared in the                     **Federal Register**                     on Wednesday, July 28, 2004, (69 FR 44988), announced that                           ( print page 68111)                        a public hearing was scheduled for Thursday, December 2, 2004, at 10 a.m. in the IRS Auditorium, Internal Revenue Service Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The subject of the public hearing is proposed regulations under section 861 of the Internal Revenue Code. The public comment period for these proposed regulations expired on Tuesday, October 26, 2004. Outlines of oral comments were due on Tuesday, November 12, 2004.                 

The notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing, instructed those interested in testifying at the public hearing to submit a request to speak and an outline of the topics to be addressed. As of Wednesday, November 17, 2004, no one has requested to speak. Therefore, the public hearing scheduled for Tuesday, December 2, 2004, is cancelled. 

Cynthia E. Grigsby, 

Acting Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel, (Procedure and Administration). 

[FR Doc. 04-25964 Filed 11-22-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Order entered April 1 4 , 2014

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 14

- 00035

- CV

DAVID EOFF, Appellant

V.

CENTRAL MUTUAL INSUR ANCE COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Tri al Court Cause No. DC

- 12

- 09034



### O RDER

T he reporter’s record in this case is overdue. By postcard dated January 29, 2014, we

notified the Court Reporter that the reporter’s record was overdue. We directed the Court

Reporter to file the record within thir ty days. To date, the reporter’s record has not been filed.

We ORDER Sheretta L. Martin, Official Court Reporter for the 162nd Judicial District

Court, to file, within TEN DAYS of the date of this order, either: (1) the reporter’s record; (2)

written ver ification that no hearings were recorded; or (3) written verification that appellant has

not paid or made arrangements to pay for the record. We notify appellant that if we receive

verification the record has not been requested, or paid for, or no arran gements have been

made to pay for the record, we will order the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record.

See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c)We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order, by electronic transmission, to:

Sheretta L. Martin

Official C ourt Reporter, 162nd Judicial District Court.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John B. Simpson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of FoxHollow Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of FoxHollow Technologies, Inc.



|                  |  |                                                                           
|----------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 9, 2006
|                  | 
|By:               |  | /s/ John B. Simpson                                                       
|                  |  | John B. Simpson                                                           
|                  |  | Interim Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
(September 28, 2006)

#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Bradford S. Wheeler, Respondent.

[822 NYS2d 160]

Mercure, J.

Appeal from an amended order of the County Court of Cortland County (Ames, J.), entered November 16, 2005, which granted defendant’s motion to suppress written and oral statements.

Defendant is charged with rape in the first degree, rape in the second degree and endangering the welfare of a child. County Court conducted a *Huntley*hearing in response to defendant’s motion to suppress oral and written statements made by him to a State Police investigator while at the State Police barracks. The court initially denied defendant’s motion to suppress. Upon reconsideration, however, County Court granted the motion, finding that the People did not meet their burden of proof regarding the voluntariness of defendant’s statements. The People appeal.

Preliminarily, inasmuch as a court has continuing jurisdiction to reconsider its prior intermediate determinations *(see Aridas v Caserta,*41 NY2d 1059, 1061 [1977]; *see also Matter of International Assn. of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Local Union No. 6, AFL-CIO v State of New York,*280 AD2d 713, 714 [2001]), we find no impropriety in County Court’s sua sponte reexamination of its decision concerning the suppression of defendant’s statements. Nor are we persuaded *1108that the court erred in granting defendant’s motion to suppress. Following the investigator’s testimony at the *Huntley*hearing that he could not recall whether he read defendant his *Miranda*warnings prior to defendant’s arrival at the police station, defendant testified that the investigator questioned him without first advising him of the *Miranda*rights while they were in the vehicle traveling to the barracks. It is undisputed that defendant was in custody during this time. Defendant stated that when they got to the police station, the investigator read him his rights for the first time and continued questioning him about the same topics. The People did not recall the investigator to the stand to rebut defendant’s testimony. Under these circumstances, the court properly determined that the People did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt the voluntariness of defendant’s subsequent statements at the barracks, made as part of a single, continuous chain of events, along with the earlier statements improperly obtained before defendant was read his *Miranda*rights (see *People v Paulman,*5 NY3d 122,130-131 [2005]; *People v Chapple,*38 NY2d 112, 115 [1975]; *People v Valerius,*31 NY2d 51, 54-55 [1972]).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the amended order is affirmed.
ATTORNEY GzuEVANCE COMMISSION

OF MARYLAND

IN THE

COURT OF APPEALS

OF MARYLAND

Misc. Docket AG No. _

September Term, 2018

v.

Petitioner,

JASON MARK SIMS

Respondent.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action filed by

Petitioner pursuant to Maryland Rules l9-721(a)(2) and l9-738 and the Respondent's

response to the Court's Order to Show Cause, if any, it is day of

2018, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland;

ORDERED, that the Respondent, Jason Mark Sims, be and hereby is temporarily

suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland pursuant to Maryland Rule

19-738(d) until further order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Jason Mark Sirns

from the register of attorneys in this Court and certiff that fact to the Trustees of the Client

Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State

in accordance with Maryland Rule l9-761(b).

Senior Judge

52

2017