alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

                    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning                           ( print page 488)                        individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.                

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Training in Veterinary and Comparative Medicine.                    

*Date:*                         February 12, 2019.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Vonda K. Smith, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 6188, MSC 7892, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-1789,                         *smithvo@csr.nih.gov.*

This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 24, 2019.

Ronald J. Livingston, Jr.,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2019-00269 Filed 1-29-19; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### § 919.130 Does exclusion under the Federal procurement system affect a person's eligibility to participate in nonprocurement transactions?

If any Federal agency excludes a person under the FAR on or after August 25, 1995, the excluded person is also ineligible to participate in nonprocurement covered transactions under this part. Therefore, an exclusion under the FAR has reciprocal effect in Federal nonprocurement transactions.
EXIM SIGNS AGREEMENTS FOR KYRGYZSTAN, CAUCASUS

----

**October 1997**
by John Crosson
Export financing will become easier for U.S. companies doing business in four smaller NISmarkets as a result of agreements signed this summer by the Export-Import Bank of the UnitedStates (Ex-Im Bank) with the governments of Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Kyrgyzstan. The new "project incentive agreements" (PIAs) will permit Ex-Im Bank to support U.S. exportsto four NIS countries where its financing had previously been completely unavailable.  
The agreements are for use in projects for which repayment will be based on export revenuesfrom the projects themselves.  Repayment is assured via offshore collateral accounts establishedfor this purpose.  The PIA for Georgia has already led to a major sale for Northrop Grumman,and is an example for companies wishing to export to these markets.
**Project Incentive Agreements: What Are They?**
Under the terms of a PIA, the host country government promises to issue the necessary licencesand provide other assurances and regulatory support in lieu of Ex-Im Bank's requirement for asovereign guarantee from the host country government.  Instead, financing is secured on the basisof export revenues derived from the transaction being financed or from related projects.  Offshorecollateral accounts are established to facilitate repayment.  Ex-Im Bank President and ChairmanJames Harmon calls the four new PIAs "an important first step toward opening the door toemerging market[s] with significant potential for U.S. exporters."
Ex-Im Bank signed its first PIA in December 1993 with Russia and has signed PIAs with Belarus,Turkmenistan, and Kazakstan in addition to the four concluded this summer.  In July 1996, Ex-ImBank approved PIA financing to support the sale of $60 million worth of mining equipment byCaterpillar and other U.S. companies to Almazy Rossii-Sakha, Russia's largest producer ofdiamonds.  As is the case with the other PIAs,  in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Kyrgyzstan,Ex-Im Bank will consider creditworthy projects that have the potential to generate sufficient hardcurrency earnings to repay the financing.  U.S. exporters should be aware, however, that if thebuyer is a government-owned entity, it may need to apply for a limited waiver of the WorldBank/EBRD "negative pledge clause" in order for Ex-Im Bank to be able to finance theproject.
**Already In Use**
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-12-0123 - Update on Staff Plans to Apply the Full-Scope Site Level 3 PRA Project Results to the NRC's Regulatory Framework

Accession Number: ML12202B170

Date Released: Friday, September 28, 2012

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML12202B171 - SECY-12-0123 - Update on Staff Plans to Apply the Full-Scope Site Level 3 PRA Project Results to the NRC's Regulatory Framework (8 page(s), 9/12/2012)
    - ML12202B172 - Potential Uses Of The Full-Scope Site Level 3 PRA Project (Enclosure to SECY-12-0123) (5 page(s), 9/13/2012)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### Constance P. Wallace, Respondent, v. Time, Incorporated, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
12/23/2010 11:13 <;15421?'=6E DWDRKIN AND A^^QC PAGE 02/03 

Michae l L Dworki n and Associates 

^-offi - n^PARTMENTOF 

•v :^PORW!C)N, 

•H OPERATIONS 

q p ?•• U^ 

VIA FA X 

465 California Sirc« 

Suite 210 December 20, 2010 

•San Francisco 

California 94104 

{415) 421-2500 

Fai (415)421-25<j0 

www.avijJec, com 

la'w(g>avl.'Jcxxom 

Hearing Docket, AOC-430 

Federal Aviation Adminisiratioii 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

WUbur Wright Building, Suite 2W1000 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

(FAX: 1-202-493-5142) 

The Honorable Richard C, Goodwin 

Administrative Law Judge 

U-S- Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building, Ground Floor, Room E12-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

(FAX: 1-202-366-7536) 

Scott R. Morris, Esq. 

Federal Aviarion Admimstration 

Northwest Mountain Region 

Office of Regional Couascl, ANM-7 

1601 Lind Avenue S.W, 

Renton, Washington 98057 

(FAX: 1-425-227-1007) 

Re: SKYWEST AIRUNES, INC. 

FAA Case No. 2009NM60048 

Hearing Docket No- CP10NM0002 

DMS No. FAA-2010-0312 

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: 

To confiim my discussions with FAA attorney Scott Morris, the parties have 

agreed to settle this matter. 

iOO/SOO® swo VVJ 2t!l9e6t'202 XVJ et?eL 0L02/eS/SL 
12/20/2010 11:13 dl54217-PS0 DUQRKIN AND AP^OC PAGE 03/03 

Hearing Docket Clerk, Judge Goodwin and Scott Morris, Esq. 

Re; Sky West Airlines, Inc. 

December 20, 2010 

Page 2 

By tlais letter, SkyWest Airlines, Inc. withdraws irs request for hearing and 

requests that this proceeding be terminated. As you know, the hesiring in this matter 

is presently scheduled for Salt Lake City on January 11-14, 2011. 

This request does not constitute, nor be deemed to constitute, an admission 

by SkyWest Airlines, Inc. of the marters alleged in the FAA's Final Notice of 

Proposed Civil Penalty or Complaint, or m the forthcoming Order Assessing Civil 

Penalty, All allegations and/or findings contained in the Final Notice of Proposed 

Civil Penalty, die Complaint and any subsequent Order continue to be denied. 

We trust that an appropriate Order Terminating Proceeding will be issued. 

Rcspectfiilly submitted, y ^ 

ye^tml y y^urs, 

/ ••' yy^^^w^ ^ ' Michael L. Dwortin 

cc: SkyWest Airlines, Inc. 

vvj snseetso s xvd Et:sL OLOS/GS/S
### **CHAPTER 11—SELECTION OF ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS**

Sec.
1101.
Policy.
1102.
Definitions.
1103.
Selection procedure.
1104.
Negotiation of contract.
DISMISS and Opinion F iled September 30, 2024 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-24-00485-CV ROSIE MCCONIC, Appellant V. GIANG HO, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-24-01397-B MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burn s, Justice Pedersen, III, and Justice Carlyle Opinion by Chief Justice Burns Appellant’s brief in this appeal is ove rdue. After appellant failed to respond to our inquiry regarding the reporter’s record, we ordered the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record and for appella nt’s brief to be filed by August 9, 2024. By postcard dated August 13, 2024, we notif ied appellant her br ief was overdue and directed her to file a brief within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of th is appeal without further notice. See T EX
. R.
A PP
. P. 38.8(a)(1). To date , appellant has not file d a brief nor otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding th e status of this appeal.–2– Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal . See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8 (a)(1); 42.3(b), (c).

240485F.P05 /Robert D. Burns, III / ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT ROSIE MCCONIC, Appellant
No. 05-24-00485-CV V. GIANG HO, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-24-01397- B. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. Justices Pedersen, III and Carlyle participating. In accordance with this Court’s opi nion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

. Judgment entered September 30, 2024
### SUBCHAPTER V—SPECIAL RESTORATIVE TRAINING
### §20109. Service of process

The corporation shall have a designated agent in the District of Columbia to receive service of process for the corporation. Notice to or service on the agent is notice to or service on the corporation.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1286.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20109 | 36:975(b). | Aug. 31, 1960, Pub. L. 86–680, §5(b), 74 Stat. 575. |

Section
#### Richard Baker et al., Respondents, v. Blanche J. Halpern et al., Appellants.

Present — Foster, P. J., Heffeman, Brewster, Santry and Bergan, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Subpart C of Part 9701

#### Editorial Note:

At 73 FR 58435, Oct. 7, 2008, the application of subpart C to part 9701 was rescinded.

#### § 9701.352 Use of highest previous rate.

DHS will issue implementing directives regarding the discretionary use of an individual's highest previous rate of basic pay received as a Federal employee or as an employee of a Coast Guard nonappropriated fund instrumentality (NAFI) in setting pay upon reemployment, transfer, reassignment, promotion, demotion, placement in a different occupational cluster, or change in type of appointment. For this purpose, basic pay may include a locality-based payment or supplement under circumstances approved by DHS. If an employee in a Coast Guard NAFI position is converted to an appropriated fund position under the pay system established under this subpart, DHS must use the existing NAFI rate to set pay upon conversion.
From: Risley, David To: Szabo, Aaron Cc: Fisher, Brian Subject: Part of E.O. 12866 Review: Interagency Discussion about Interstate Transport Rule for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS (2060-AS05) Date: Wednesday, October 07, 2015 10:39:12 AM Attachments: EO12866_2008 O3 NAAQS CSAPR Update 2060 AS05 NPRM FRN_20151007 Policy Overview Briefing.pptx EO12866_2008 O3 NAAQS CSAPR Update 2060 AS05 NPRM FRN_20151007 RIA Briefing.pptx



## Aaron, Attached are the briefing documents that we’ll use for today’s overview briefing. Please let us know if you have any questions.

Best, David
EXHIBIT
10.42


 


AMENDMENT TWO TO THE


2000 PERFORMANCE SHARE PLAN OF


DUKE-WEEKS REALTY CORPORATION


 


This Amendment Two to the 2000
Performance Share Plan of Duke-Weeks Realty Corporation (“Plan”) is hereby
adopted this 28th day of January, 2004 by Duke Realty Limited Partnership
(“Corporation”). Each capitalized term not otherwise defined herein has the
meaning set forth in the Plan.


 


WITNESSETH:


 


WHEREAS, the
Corporation maintains the Plan for the purposes set forth therein; and


 


WHEREAS,
pursuant to Section 4.1 of the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Corporation
(“Board”) and the Executive Compensation Committee of the Board (“Committee”)
have reserved the right to amend the Plan with respect to certain matters; and


 


WHEREAS, the
Committee has determined to amend the Plan to clarify the definition of “Funds
from Operations Per Share;” and


 


WHEREAS, the
Committee has approved and authorized this Amendment Two;


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, pursuant to the authority reserved to the Committee under Section
4.1 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of January 28, 2004,
with respect to all Performance Shares granted at any time under the Plan in
the following particular:


 


By adding the following sentence to the end
of Section 3.3.2 of the Plan:


 


If the manner in
which Funds from Operations Per Share is computed by the Partnership is changed
as a result of a directive from the National Association of Real Estate
Investment Trusts or the Securities and Exchange Commission after the date on
which the Performance Goals for a Performance Period is established by the
Committee, then the determination of whether the Performance Goals have been
achieved for such Performance Period shall be based upon the computation of
Funds from Operations per Share using the methodology in effect on the date the
Performance Goals were established.


 


All other
provisions of the Plan shall remain the same.


 


IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, Duke Realty Limited Partnership, by its duly authorized officer, has
executed this Amendment Two to the 2000 Performance Share Plan of Duke-Weeks
Realty Corporation this 28th day of January, 2004.


 


	
   

  	
  DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

  
	
   

  
	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
    /s/
  Dennis D. Oklak

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Dennis D.
  Oklak, President
Editorial Note on Part 922
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

§ 922.35 Special use permit fees. ( a ) *Authority to assess fees.* The Director may assess a fee for the conduct of any activity authorized under a special use permit issued under § 922.31. The Director may collect assessed fees through agreement with the permit applicant. No special use permit may be effective until all assessed fees are received unless otherwise provided by the Director by a fee schedule set forth as a permit condition.
( b ) *Components of permit fees.* A fee assessed under this section may include: ( 1 ) All costs incurred, or expected to be incurred, in reviewing and processing the permit application, including, but not limited to, costs for: ( i ) Personnel;
( ii ) Personnel hours;
( iii ) Equipment;
( iv ) Environmental analysis, assessment or consultation;
( v ) Copying; and
( vi ) Overhead costs directly related to reviewing and processing the permit application;
( 2 ) All costs incurred, or expected to be incurred, as a direct result of the conduct of the activity for which the permit is being issued, including, but not limited to: ( i ) The cost of monitoring the conduct both during the activity and after the activity is completed in order to assess the impacts to sanctuary resources and qualities;
( ii ) The use of an official NOAA observer, including travel and expenses and personnel hours; and
( iii ) Overhead costs directly related to the permitted activity; and
( 3 ) An amount which represents the fair market value of the use of the sanctuary resource.
§ 8a.425 Counseling and use of appraisal and counseling materials. ( a ) *Counseling.* A recipient shall not discriminate against any person on the basis of sex in the counseling or guidance of students or applicants for admission.
( b ) *Use of appraisal and counseling materials.* A recipient that uses testing or other materials for appraising or counseling students shall not use different materials for students on the basis of their sex or use materials that permit or require different treatment of students on such basis unless such different materials cover the same occupations and interest areas and the use of such different materials is shown to be essential to eliminate sex bias. Recipients shall develop and use internal procedures for ensuring that such materials do not discriminate on the basis of sex. Where the use of a counseling test or other instrument results in a substantially disproportionate number of members of one sex in any particular course of study or classification, the recipient shall take such action as is necessary to assure itself that such disproportion is not the result of discrimination in the instrument or its application.
( c ) *Disproportion in classes.* Where a recipient finds that a particular class contains a substantially disproportionate number of individuals of one sex, the recipient shall take such action as is necessary to assure itself that such disproportion is not the result of discrimination on the basis of sex in counseling or appraisal materials or by counselors.
#### Westchester Mortgage Company, Respondent, *v.*Thomas B. McIntire, Inc., Defendant, Impleaded with William H. Foster, Appellant.

Second Department,

June 11, 1915.

Bills and notes — effect of extension of time of payment of note in suit upon liability of guarantor who had previously agreed to an extension.

Where, after the maker and guarantor of a note were in default in a suit thereon, the holder extended the time of payment of the note in suit and two others for a specified time, such extension did not discharge the guarantor who had agreed to prior extensions.

Such written extension of payment did not have a retroactive effect so as to amount to a withdrawal of the pending suit in which the guarantor was in default.

Appeal by the defendant, William H. Foster, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Westchester on the 25th day of January, 1915, upon the verdict of a jury rendered by direction of the court, both sides having moved for the direction of a verdict at the close of the case.

The judgment was for the amount of a promissory note and interest.

*Frederick B. Van Kleeck, Jr.,*for the appellant.

*Jonathan Holden,*for the respondent.

Putnam, J.:

Defendant raises the. effect of an extension of time of payment of a note already in suit. After the maker and guaran*466tor were in default, the holder extended the note in suit, and two others, from July fourteenth to August first. Such indulgence did not discharge appellant as guarantor, because in the previous March he had agreed in writing to one or more extensions if in all not over six months. But appellant urges that this written extension of payment had a retroactive effect and amounted to a withdrawal of the pending suit in which he was already in default. We cannot, however, read into this extension (which only gave further time to pay the note) such enlargement of its scope and effect. It looked to the future and made no mention of the suit which had been regularly instituted. It would be going far to say that such forbearance tacitly discontinued the suit so that if the note should be not paid on August first plaintiff would have to begin a new action. The words used and the intent to be presumed meant only that further steps in the suit and the entry of judgment were to be held in abeyance. If not paid when the time was up the note could then be put in judgment. We may look also at the effect of a contrary holding. To such a kindly forbearance it would annex legal consequences which would tend to discourage courtesy and indulgence to one served with process, while the. policy of the law should favor a reasonable respite to a debtor in temporary difficulty.

The judgment should, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.

Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
§ 905.2 Definitions. When used in this part: *Consenting owner* means the owner, operator, or crewmember of a vessel carrying a voluntary fishery data collector.
*Enforcement proceeding* means any judicial or administrative trial or hearing, initiated for the purpose of imposing any civil or criminal penalty authorized under the Magnuson Act, MMPA, or ESA, including but not limited to, any proceeding initiated to: Impose a monetary penalty; modify, sanction, suspend or revoke a lease, license or permit; secure forfeiture of seized property; or incarcerate an individual.
*ESA* means the Endangered Species Act, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 1531 *et seq.*, and implementing regulations.
*Information* means all observations, data, statistics, photographs, film, or recordings collected by a voluntary fishery data collector for conservation and management purposes, as defined by the Magnuson Act, MMPA, or ESA, while onboard the vessel of a consenting owner.
*Magnuson Act* means the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 1801 *et seq.*, and implementing regulations.
*MMPA* means the Marine Mammal Protection Act, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 1361 *et seq.,* and implementing regulations.
*Secretary* means the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of the Interior, their chosen designees, or any other Federal agency authorized to enforce the provisions of the Magnuson Act, MMPA, or ESA.
*Vessel* means any vessel as defined at 16 U.S.C. 1802(31).
*Voluntary fishery data collector* means: ( 1 ) Any person, including an observer or a sea sampler;
( 2 ) Placed aboard a vessel by the Secretary;
( 3 ) For the purpose of collecting information; and
( 4 ) Whose presence aboard that vessel is not required by the Secretary pursuant to provisions of the Magnuson Act, MMPA, or ESA, or their implementing regulations.