alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §6137. Penalties

(a) In General.—An individual who violates this subchapter, or a regulation prescribed under section 6102 of this title, shall be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 60 days, or both.

(b) Venue and Procedure.—Prosecution for a violation described in subsection (a) shall be in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia or in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, on information by the United States Attorney or an Assistant United States Attorney.

(c) Offenses Involving Property Damage Over $100.—If during the commission of a violation described in subsection (a), public property is damaged in an amount exceeding $100, the period of imprisonment for the offense may be not more than five years.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1183; Pub. L. 108–356, §2, Oct. 21, 2004, 118 Stat. 1416.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6137 | 40:13m. | Aug. 18, 1949, ch. 479, §8, 63 Stat. 617. |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "fined under title 18" are substituted for "fined not more than $100" for consistency with chapter 227 of title 18.

In subsection (b), the words "Superior Court of the District of Columbia" are substituted for "Municipal Court for the District of Columbia" [subsequently changed to "District of Columbia Court of General Sessions" because of sections 1 and 7 of the Act of July 8, 1963 (Public Law 88–60, 77 Stat. 77, 78)] because of section 155(a) of the District of Columbia Court Reorganization Act of 1970 (Public Law 91–358, 85 Stat. 570).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2004—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 108–356 added subsec. (b) and struck out heading and text of former subsec. (b). Text read as follows: "Prosecution for a violation described in subsection (a) shall be in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, on information by the United States Attorney or an Assistant United States Attorney."
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 217 (Wednesday, November 10, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 65153]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25051]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers


Chief of Engineers Environmental Advisory Board; Meeting

AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

ACTION: Notice; cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Chief of Engineers Environmental Advisory Board meeting 
scheduled for November 19, 2004, from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. published in 
the Federal Register on Thursday, November 4, 2004 (69 FR 64282), has 
been cancelled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Norman Edwards, Headquarters, U.S. 
Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC 20314-1000; Ph: 202-761-1934.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-25051 Filed 11-9-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-92-M
#### § 801.4 Recordkeeping requirements.

In accordance with section 3104(b)(1) of title 22 of the United States Code, persons subject to the jurisdiction of the United States shall maintain any information essential for carrying out the surveys and studies provided for by the Act.

[79 FR 47575, Aug. 14, 2014, as amended at 79 FR 53291, Sept. 9, 2014; 79 FR 69759, Nov. 24, 2014]
Order filed October 21, 2016

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 16

- 00716

- CV

____________ In the Interest of S.G.F., Child

On Appeal from the 315th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2015

- 04655J

ORDER This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment in a parental termination appeal. Appellant’ s brief was due October 19, 2016

. No brief has been filed. Appeals in parental termination cases and child protection cases are to be brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed.
See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (effective May 1, 2012). This accelerated schedule requires greater compliance wit h briefing deadlines. Therefore we order appellant’s appointed counsel
, William M. Thursland
, to file appellant’s brief no later than October 31, 2016. If the brief is not filed by that date, counsel may be required to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of court. In addition, the court may require appointment of new counsel due to the failure to timely file appellant’s brief.

PER CURIAM
§ 904.5 Appearances. ( a ) A party may appear in person or by or with counsel or other representative.
( b ) Whenever an attorney or other representative contacts the Agency on behalf of another person with regard to any matter that has resulted in, or may result in, a written warning, a NOVA, NOPS, NIDP, or a forfeiture proceeding, that attorney or other representative shall file a Notice of Appearance with the Agency. Such notice shall indicate the name of the person on whose behalf the appearance is made.
( c ) Each attorney or other representative who represents a party in any hearing shall file a written Notice of Appearance with the Judge. Such notice shall indicate the name of the case, the docket number, and the party on whose behalf the appearance is made.
Editorial Note on Part 4
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 80 FR 70154, Nov. 13, 2015.

§ 4.27 Procedures for making requests for correction or amendment. ( a ) Any individual, regardless of age, who is a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence into the United States may submit a request for correction or amendment to the Department. The request should be made either in person or by mail addressed to the Privacy Act Officer who processed the individual's request for access to the record, and to whom is delegated authority to make initial determinations on requests for correction or amendment. The offices of Privacy Act Officers are open to the public between the hours of 9 a.m. and 4 p.m. Monday through Friday (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public holidays).
( b ) Requests submitted by mail should include the words “PRIVACY ACT REQUEST” in capital letters at the top of the letter and on the face of the envelope. Any request that is not addressed as specified in paragraph (a) of this section or that is not marked as specified in this paragraph will be so addressed and marked by Department personnel and forwarded immediately to the responsible Privacy Act Officer. A request that is not properly addressed by the individual will not be deemed to have been “received” for purposes of measuring the time period for response until actual receipt by the Privacy Act Officer. In each instance when a request so forwarded is received, the Privacy Act Officer shall notify the individual that his or her request was improperly addressed and the date the request was received at the proper address.
( c ) Since the request, in all cases, will follow a request for access under § 4.25, the individual's identity will be established by his or her signature on the request and use of the Department control number assigned to the request.
( d ) A request for correction or amendment should include the following: ( 1 ) Specific identification of the record sought to be corrected or amended (for example, description, title, date, paragraph, sentence, line and words);
( 2 ) The specific wording to be deleted, if any;
( 3 ) The specific wording to be inserted or added, if any, and the exact place at which it is to be inserted or added; and,
( 4 ) A statement of the basis for the requested correction or amendment, with all available supporting documents and materials that substantiate the statement. The statement should identify the criterion of the Act being invoked, that is, whether the information in the record is unnecessary, inaccurate, irrelevant, untimely or incomplete.
§ 536.204 Period of grade retention. ( a ) Unless grade retention is terminated under § 536.208, an employee is entitled to retain the grade held immediately before the action that provides entitlement to grade retention for 2 years beginning on the date the employee is placed in the lower-graded position.
( b ) During the 2-year period of grade retention, if an agency further reduces an employee in grade under circumstances also entitling the employee to grade retention, the employee must continue to retain the previous retained grade for the remainder of the first 2-year period. At the end of the first 2-year period, the employee is entitled to retain the grade of the position from which the second reduction in grade was made for 2 years following the effective date of the second reduction in grade.
( c ) Notwithstanding § 536.207(a)(1), grade retention continues to apply to an employee serving under an interim appointment made under 5 CFR 772.102 for the duration of the original 2-year grade retention period if the employee's grade was retained under this part in the appointment immediately preceding the interim appointment.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Edward R. Hammock, on Behalf of Demetruce Hayes, Petitioner, v Warden, Respondent.

[820 NYS2d 891]

Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application for bail reduction upon Queens County docket No. 2006QN034626 to release the defendant on his own recognizance or, in the alternative, fixing bail.

Adjudged that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The determination of the Supreme Court, Queens County, was not an improvident exercise of discretion, and did not violate “constitutional or statutory standards” *(People ex rel. Klein v Krueger,*25 NY2d 497, 499 [1969]; *see People ex rel. Rosenthal v*Wolfson, 48 NY2d 230 [1979]). Schmidt, J.P., Adams, Dillon and Covello, JJ., concur.
Product Certification in Russia

----
#### § 742.16 [Reserved]
#### Margaret M. Davis, Respondent, v. Vincent Froatz et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Present-—-Townley, Glennon, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
HeatExchanger_ID HeatExchagerType Notes 1 Serpentine 2 Tubular 3 Clamshell
###### Editorial Note on Subpart G of Part 9701

#### Editorial Note:

At 73 FR 58435, Oct. 7, 2008, the application of subpart G to part 9701 was rescinded.

#### § 9701.702 Waivers.

When a specified category of employees is covered by an appeals system established under this subpart, the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 7701 are waived with respect to that category of employees to the extent they are inconsistent with the provisions of this subpart. The provisions of 5 U.S.C. 7702 are modified as provided in § 9701.709 to use “MSPB or MRP” wherever the terms “Merit Systems Protection Board” or “Board” occur. The appellate procedures specified herein supersede those of MSPB to the extent MSPB regulations are inconsistent with this subpart. MSPB must follow the provisions in this subpart until conforming regulations are issued by MSPB.
### §1103. Selection procedure

(a) In General.—These procedures apply to the procurement of architectural and engineering services by an agency head.

(b) Annual Statements.—The agency head shall encourage firms to submit annually a statement of qualifications and performance data.

(c) Evaluation.—For each proposed project, the agency head shall evaluate current statements of qualifications and performance data on file with the agency, together with statements submitted by other firms regarding the proposed project. The agency head shall conduct discussions with at least 3 firms to consider anticipated concepts and compare alternative methods for furnishing services.

(d) Selection.—From the firms with which discussions have been conducted, the agency head shall select, in order of preference, at least 3 firms that the agency head considers most highly qualified to provide the services required. Selection shall be based on criteria established and published by the agency head.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1130.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1103 | 40:543. | June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title IX, §903, as added Pub. L. 92–582, Oct. 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1279. |

Section

In subsection (b), the words "engaged in the lawful practice of their profession" are omitted as unnecessary because of the definition of "firm" in section 1102 of the revised title.

In subsection (c), the words "compare alternative methods for furnishing services" are substituted for "the relative utility of alternative methods of approach for furnishing the required services" to eliminate unnecessary words.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Architectural and Engineering Services

Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title XIV, §1427(b), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1670, as amended by Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVII, §1702(l)(8), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2161, provided that: "Architectural and engineering services (as defined in section 1102 of title 40, United States Code) shall not be offered under multiple-award schedule contracts entered into by the Administrator of General Services or under Governmentwide task and delivery order contracts entered into under sections 3403 and 3405 of title 10, United States Code, or sections 303H and 303I of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 ([former] 41 U.S.C. 253h and 253i) [now 41 U.S.C. 4103, 4105(a) to (c)(1), (d) to (i)] unless such services—

"(1) are performed under the direct supervision of a professional architect or engineer licensed, registered, or certified in the State, territory (including the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico), possession, or Federal District in which the services are to be performed; and

"(2) are awarded in accordance with the selection procedures set forth in chapter 11 of title 40, United States Code."
#### William J. Spain v. James Talcott.

Motion denied to the extent stated in opinion per cur iam. Order to be settled on notice. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ,
#### In the Matter of Paul Klafeke, Respondent, against County of Nassau, et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Oun.jwell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
§ 960.1 Purpose. ( a ) The regulations in this part implement the Secretary's authority to license the operation of private remote sensing space systems under the Land Remote Sensing Policy Act of 1992, as amended, codified at 51 U.S.C. 60101 *et seq.,* and are intended to promote continued U.S. private sector innovation and leadership in the global remote sensing industry.
( b ) In carrying out this part, the Secretary takes into account the following considerations: ( 1 ) Technological changes in remote sensing;
( 2 ) Non-technological changes in the remote sensing space industry, such as to business models and practices;
( 3 ) The relative burden to licensees and benefits to national security and international policies of license conditions;
( 4 ) Changes in the methods to mitigate risks to national security and international policies;
( 5 ) International obligations of the United States;
( 6 ) The availability of data from sources in other nations;
( 7 ) The remote sensing regulatory environment in other nations; and
( 8 ) The potential for overlapping regulatory burdens imposed by other U.S. Government agencies.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 Pursuant to Section 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on September 28, 2004, Orasure Technologies, Inc., Lehigh University, Seeley G. Mudd-Building 6, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed: Drug
ScheduleAlphamethadol (9605)
IBenzoylecgonine (9180)
IIMorphine (9300)
II
 The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances in bulk to manufacture other controlled substances. Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such substances may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a). Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA 
                    **Federal Register**
                    Representative, Office of Liaison and Policy (ODLR) and must be filed no later than January 21, 2005. Dated: November 8, 2004. William J. Walker, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 04-25769 Filed 11-19-04; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
Editorial Note on Part 400
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 400 appear at 78 FR 69289, Nov. 19, 2013.

§ 400.25 Application for subzone designation. In addition to the requirements of §§ 400.21(d)(1)(i) and (ii) pertaining to legal authority, § 400.21(d)(2)(vii) pertaining to environmental aspects of the proposal, and § 400.21(d)(3)(i) and (iii) pertaining to operation, a grantee's application for subzone designation shall contain the following information: ( a ) The name of the operator/user for which subzone designation is sought;
( b ) The nature of the activity at the proposed subzone;
( c ) The address(es) and physical size (acreage or square feet) of the proposed subzone location(s); and
( d ) One or more maps conforming to the requirements of section § 400.21(d)(5)(ii). For any production activity to be conducted at a proposed subzone, the separate requirements of § 400.14(a) must be met.
Effective Date Note
Effective Date Note: At 77 FR 12139, Feb. 28, 2012, § 400.25 was added. This section contains information collection and recordkeeping requirements and will not become effective until approval has been given by the Office of Management and Budget.
Gazprom Projects

----
§ 711.6 Where to obtain forms. ( a ) Forms to complete declarations and reports required by the CWCR may be obtained by contacting: Treaty Compliance Division, Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 4515, 14th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, Telephone: (202) 482-1001. Forms and forms software may also be downloaded from the Internet at *www.cwc.gov .*
( b ) If the amount of information you are required to submit is greater than the given form will allow, multiple copies of forms may be submitted.
[71 FR 24929, Apr. 27, 2006, as amended at 73 FR 78182, Dec. 22, 2008]
### **CHAPTER 11—ESTABLISHMENT OF OFFICE AND AUTHORITY AND FUNCTIONS OF ADMINISTRATOR**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL

Sec.
1101.
Office of Federal Procurement Policy.
1102.
Administrator.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—AUTHORITY AND FUNCTIONS OF THE ADMINISTRATOR

1121.
General authority.
1122.
Functions.
1123.
Small business concerns.
1124.
Tests of innovative procurement methods and procedures.
1125.
Recipients of Federal grants or assistance.
1126.
Policy regarding consideration of contractor past performance.
1127.
Determining benchmark compensation amount.
1128.
Maintaining necessary capability with respect to acquisition of architectural and engineering services.
1129.
Center of excellence in contracting for services.
1130.
Effect of division on other law.
1131.
Annual report.

#### Amendment of Analysis

Pub. L. 113–67, div. A, title VII, §702(b)(2), (c), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 1189, provided that, applicable only with respect to costs of compensation incurred under contracts entered into on or after the date that is 180 days after Dec. 26, 2013, this analysis is amended by striking out item 1127. See 2013 Amendment note below.

Pub. L. 113–66, div. A, title VIII, §811(c)(2), (d), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 806, provided that, applicable with respect to costs of compensation incurred under contracts entered into on or after the date that is 180 days after Dec. 26, 2013, this analysis is amended by striking out item 1127. See 2013 Amendment note below.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2013**—Pub. L. 113–66, div. A, title VIII, §811(c)(2), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 806, and Pub. L. 113–67, div. A, title VII, §702(b)(2), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 1189, struck out item 1127 "Determining benchmark compensation amount".
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 9, 2015

t1202 

# Order

Clerk December 9, 2015

152075

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 152075

COA: 327015

Muskegon CC: 13

- 063905

- FC

TERRY WESLEY RAAP,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 17, 2015 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, beca use we are not persuaded

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER





I,
      Mark
      A. Emalfarb, Chief Executive Officer of Dyadic International Inc. (the
“Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





1.
            The
                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period
                ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the
                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
                Act of
                1934, and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
                Company.








IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
      10 th day
      of November 2006.





//s/
      Mark A.
      Emalfarb


________________________


Name:
      Mark A. Emalfarb


Title:
      Chief Executive Officer








This
      certification accompanies the Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Dyadic International, Inc. for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Dyadic International, Inc. and will be retained by Dyadic International, Inc.
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
### Part I—Additional Corporation Activities To Support National Service