alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BISNIS Trades & Tenders, December 28, 1998  -- PART 2

----

International Copyright, U.S. & Foreign Commercial Service and U.S. Department of State, 1997.      All rights reserved outside of the United States.
The Business Information Service for the Newly Independent States (BISNIS) is the U.S. Department ofCommerce's information clearinghouse on trade and investment in the emerging markets of the newlyindependent states of the former Soviet Union.  BISNIS has created the "BISNIS Trades & Tenders"electronic newsletter to help U.S.. companies find business opportunities in these expanding markets.
These opportunities are provided solely as an informational service and do not represent an endorsementby the U.S. Department of Commerce. Verification of leads is the responsibility of the reader. BISNISmay consider other private sector-generated trade leads and tenders, in electronic form only, and publishon a space-available basis.   Please send your leads to [email protected]
A full selection of BISNIS leads and other market intelligence is available via BISNIS OnLine at: www.mac.doc.gov/BISNIS
#### Howard F. LeBuff, Respondent, v. Sears, Roebuck & Company, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ.
### §3002a. Nonmailability of locksmithing devices

(a) Any locksmithing device is nonmailable mail, shall not be carried or delivered by mail, and shall be disposed of as the Postal Service directs, unless such device is mailed to—

(1) a lock manufacturer or distributor;

(2) a bona fide locksmith;

(3) a bona fide repossessor; or

(4) a motor vehicle manufacturer or dealer.

(b) For the purpose of this section, "locksmithing device" means—

(1) a device or tool (other than a key) designed to manipulate the tumblers in a lock into the unlocked position through the keyway of such lock;

(2) a device or tool (other than a key or a device or tool under paragraph (1)) designed for the unauthorized opening or bypassing of a lock or similar security device; and

(3) a device or tool designed for making an impression of a key or similar security device to duplicate such key or device.

(Added Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7090(a), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4409.)
#### § 8c.11 Notice.

The agency shall make available to employees, applicants, participants, beneficiaries, and other interested persons such information regarding the provisions of this part and its applicability to the programs or activities conducted by the agency, and make such information available to them in such manner as the Secretary of Commerce or the Secretary's designee finds necessary to apprise such persons of the protections against discrimination assured them by section 504 and this regulation.
### §11505. Rule of construction

This chapter does not authorize the appropriation or obligation of amounts for the pilot program authorized under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1246; Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title VIII, §825(b)(2)(C), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2616; Pub. L. 107–347, title II, §210(h)(2)(C), Dec. 17, 2002, 116 Stat. 2938.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 11505 | 40:1475. | Pub. L. 104–106, div. E, title LIII, §5305, Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 692. |

Section

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2002—Pub. L. 107–314 and Pub. L. 107–347 amended section identically, substituting "program" for "programs".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2002 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 107–347 effective 120 days after Dec. 17, 2002, see section 402(a) of Pub. L. 107–347, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3601 of Title 44, Public Printing and Documents.
§ 1180.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) The purpose of this regulation is to facilitate public access to the vast amount of scientific, technical and engineering information (STEI) that is produced by and for federal agencies.
( b ) This regulation provides a variety of methods for federal agencies to adopt to ensure the timely transfer to the National Technical Information Service (NTIS) of all unclassified STEI that is available for public dissemination and that results from federal funding. It is issued pursuant to the authority contained in Section 108 of the American Technology Preeminence Act (Pub. L. 102-245).
### §6505. Structural and mechanical care and security

(a) Structural and Mechanical Care.—The Architect of the Capitol, under the direction of the Commission for the Judiciary Office Building—

(1) is responsible for the structural and mechanical care and maintenance of the Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building and improvements, including the care and maintenance of the grounds of the Building, in the same manner and to the same extent as for the structural and mechanical care and maintenance of the Supreme Court Building under section 6111 of this title; and

(2) shall perform all other duties and work required for the operation and domestic care of the Building and improvements.

(b) Security.—

(1) Capitol police.—The United States Capitol Police—

(A) are responsible for all exterior security of the Building and other improvements constructed under this chapter; and

(B) may police the Building and other improvements, including the interior and exterior, and may make arrests within the interior and exterior of the Building and other improvements for any violation of federal or state law or the laws of the District of Columbia, or any regulation prescribed under any of those laws.

(2) Marshal of the supreme court.—This chapter does not interfere with the obligation of the Marshal of the Supreme Court to protect justices, officers, employees, or other personnel of the Supreme Court who may occupy the Building and other improvements.

(3) Reimbursement.—The Architect shall transfer from the account described in section 6507 of this title amounts necessary to reimburse the United States Capitol Police for expenses incurred in providing exterior security under this subsection. The Capitol Police may accept amounts the Architect transfers under this paragraph. Those amounts shall be credited to the appropriation account charged by the Capitol Police in carrying out security duties.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1190.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6505(a) | 40:1204(a). | Pub. L. 100–480, §5, Oct. 7, 1988, 102 Stat. 2331; Pub. L. 102–392, title III, §311(a), Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1723. |
| 6505(b)(1)(A) | 40:1204(b)(1). | |
| 6505(b)(1)(B) | 40:1204(c). | |
| 6505(b)(2), (3) | 40:1204(b)(2), (3). | |

Section

In subsection (a), before clause (1), the words "Upon occupancy by the United States of the building and other improvements constructed under this chapter" are omitted as obsolete.
### §602. Foreign letters out of the mails

(a) Except as provided in section 601 of this title, the master of a vessel departing from the United States for foreign ports may not receive on board or transport any letter which originated in the United States that—

(1) has not been regularly received from a United States post office; or

(2) does not relate to the cargo of the vessel.

(b) The officer of the port empowered to grant clearances shall require from the master of such a vessel, as a condition of clearance, an oath that he does not have under his care or control, and will not receive or transport, any letter contrary to the provisions of this section.

(c) Except as provided in section 1699 of title 18, the master of a vessel arriving at a port of the United States carrying letters not regularly in the mails shall deposit them in the post office at the port of arrival.

(Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 727.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1971, pursuant to Resolution No. 71–9 of the Board of Governors. See section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note preceding section 101 of this title.
**FREEDOM
      BANCSHARES, INC.**


**AND
      SUBSIDIARY**





**EXHIBIT
      32.2**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Freedom
      Bancshares, Inc. (the “ Company ”)
      for
      the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 (the “ Periodic
      Report ”),
      the
      undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to Title 18, Section 1350 United States
      Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      to
      the best of his knowledge and belief, that the Periodic Report fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934 and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.





May
      15,
      2006








/s/
                Clyde A. McArthurClyde
                A. McArthurChief
                Financial Officer







A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Freedom Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by Freedom Bancshares, Inc. and
      furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.





The
      information in this Exhibit 32.2 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
## Pr opo s e d R u l e : M a n d a t o r y Re p o r t i n g o f G r ee n h o u s e G a s E m i s s i o n s

M ee ti n g D o c u m e n t a t i o n K i n d e r M o r g an 1 2 / 15 / 09

D at e S ta ff C o n ta ct I n fo r m a ti o n N am e of O r g a n i z a ti o n S u m ma

r y o f D i s c u ss i o n W r i tt e n C o mm e n t s

P r ov i d e d ?

D i d t h e y al s o s u b mi t t o

D o c k e t ? D at e

s e n t t o

E PA

CC D

12 / 15 / 09 B a r bo r

a M a s t e r

L i s a B a c an s k

a s B ill W

e h r u m ( H un t on &

W i l li a m s )

R

. T i m B r ad l ey ( K i nd e r

M o r gan ) A m ong t h e i ss u e s : g e o l o g i c

s e qu e s t r a ti o n

, e nhan ce d o i l

r ec o ve r y

, e m i ss i on s

, C O 2 s upp l

y
Exhibit 99.1

MAVERICK INVESTMENT CORP.





July 30, 2006



Capital Mineral Investors, Inc.
c/o 9217 Pavilion Place
Mission, B.C.  
V2V 6X6

Attention:  Jerry Dibble, President

Re:	Option Agreement dated May 31, 2006 between Capital Mineral Investors, Inc. ("CMI") 
and Maverick Investment Corp. ("Maverick") regarding 71 claim cells and 14 claims lots in Quebec, Canada (the "Dibble Option Agreement")

Under the Dibble Option Agreement dated May 31, 2006 between CMI & Maverick, CMI is required to pay to Maverick $30,000 on or before July 31, 2006.  Maverick hereby agrees to extend the time period for this payment to December 31, 2006.  There is no interest and no fees that become payable as a result of this extension.

Yours truly,

MAVERICK INVESTMENT CORP.

/s/ "Patrick O'Brien"

Patrick O'Brien
President
#### Ruth Whitney, by Arthur A. Whitney, Appellee, v. Frank N. Derby and William M. Derby, Jr., Appellants.

Gen. No. 21,358.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. H. Steeling Pomeroy, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the March term, 1915.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed January 3, 1916.

Statement of the Case.

Action by Ruth Whitney, by Arthur A. Whitney, her father and next friend, plaintiff, against Frank N. Derby and William M. Derby, Jr., defendants, for injuries received by the fall of a stone railing. There was a verdict for plaintiff for $1,250, which, on the suggestion of the trial court, was remitted to $650. From this judgment, defendants appeal.

The evidence showed that plaintiff was injured by a stone railing falling on her as she was playing on the front steps of a building where she lived, which building was owned by the defendants. In her declaration she alleged that this stone railing was suffered by the defendants “to be loose, so that it was likely to fall over,” and that “while plaintiff was about to enter said premises, in passing upon and along said steps in dangerous proximity of said stone slab or railing, without any fault or negligence on her part, by reason of the carelessness and negligence of the defendants, and each of them, aforesaid, the said stone slab or railing fell or toppled against and upon the said plaintiff.” There was evidence that plaintiff “rocked” the stone back and forth, though warned of the danger at the time, and finally pulled it over on her.

Warren Pease, for appellants.

*310Abstract of the Decision.

1. Landlord and tenant, § *230*
      ***
      *-—when landlord not liable for. injury to child of tenant.*In an action by an infant child of a tenant against a landlord to recover for injuries by the falling of a railing, evidence examined and *held*to show that injury was caused by negligence of plaintiff.

2. Damages, § *122*
      ***
      *—when verdict excessive.*A verdict of $1,250 for scratches or abrasions on plaintiff’s leg, from which she quickly recovered, is so excessive as to indicate that the jury were moved by prejudice and sympathy, and the judgment will not be allowed to stand even though plaintiff remitted all in excess of $650.

Coburn & Bentley, for appellee.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### § 1500.71 Books and records.

Each manufacturer subject to this Order shall maintain and make available for inspection by the Secretary such books and records as are necessary to carry out the provisions of this Order, including such records as are necessary to verify any reports required. Such records shall be retained for at least 7 years beyond the fiscal period of their applicability.
Rozlyn N. DePonte 

P 0 Box 1355 

Kaunakakai, HI 96748 

Mr. Kevin Schlemmer 

Director, Essential Air Service 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Email address: 

Kevin Schlemmer: kevin.schlemmer@dot.gov 

Scott Faulk: scott.faulk@dot.gov 

Kevin Adams: kevin.adams@dot.gov 

Subject: Support for Mokulele's Kalaupapa EAS proposal 

When I travel to visit my family on Oahu and Maui, I always fly on Mokulele because I know I can 

depend on them. The people who work for Mokulele are so friendly and helpful, and I always feel safe 

and in good hands when I travel on their flights. Now I have heard thatMokulele would like permission 

to fly to and from Kalaupapa, and I am very much in favor of that idea. I believe that the people who live 

there and the people who come to take tours would enjoy flying on Mokulele as much as I do, so I hope 

you will give them the permission to fly to Kalaupapa. 

!fi; 

Rozlyn N. DePonte
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Herman Goldberg, Paula Cohen, Stella Silinsky, Yetta Edelman, Henrietta Loehman and Ida Cohen, Appellants.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Cohn, J., dissents as to the defendants Paula Cohen, Henrietta Loehman, Stella Silinsky and Ida Cohen, and votes to reverse and dismiss the information, on the ground that the guilt of these defendants was not established beyond a reasonable doubt.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6574** 

MALCOLM E. PFEIFFER

- EL , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED STATES CONGRESS; UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT , Respondents

– Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. Terrence W . Boyle , District Judge. ( 5:11

- hc

- 02061

- BO )

Submitted : July 26, 2012 Decided: August 2, 2012

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Malcolm E. Pfeiffer

- El , Appellant Pro Se
. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Malcolm E. Pfeiffer

- El , a state prisoner, seeks to
ap peal the district c ourt’s order denying relief on his “Averment of Jurisdiction
. ” Because Pfeiffer

- El is a state prisoner , and the pleading was appropriately docketed as one arising under 28 U.S.C. § 22 41 (2006) , the district court’s

or der is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)( 2 ) (2006)
. A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the distri ct court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Pfeiffer

- El has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability , deny leave3 to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISS ED
#### § 8a.440 Health and insurance benefits and services.

Subject to § 8a.235(d), in providing a medical, hospital, accident, or life insurance benefit, service, policy, or plan to any of its students, a recipient shall not discriminate on the basis of sex, or provide such benefit, service, policy, or plan in a manner that would violate §§ 8a.500 through 8a.550 if it were provided to employees of the recipient. This section shall not prohibit a recipient from providing any benefit or service that may be used by a different proportion of students of one sex than of the other, including family planning services. However, any recipient that provides full coverage health service shall provide gynecological care.
________________________________________________________________________ 

TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 20-1223 

SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL COOPERATION 

Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA 

Extending the Agreement of July 2, 1999 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at Washington 

December 2 and 23, 2020 

Entered into force December 23, 2020 

With Effect from July 2, 2020 
 

 

 

NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)— 

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.”
2nd Amend / Kelly A. Gray



 Exhibit 10.47 
  
 SECOND AMENDMENT 
 TO 
 AMENDED AND
RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 This Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (this
“Second Amendment”), dated September 24, 2002, is entered into by and between St. John Knits, Inc., a California corporation (“Company”), and Kelly A. Gray, an individual (“Executive”), and amends terms of that certain
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of July 14, 1998, as amended, between the Company and Executive (the “1998 Agreement”). In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement set forth herein, the parties hereto agree
as follows (all capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the 1998 Agreement). 
  
 1.
Section II.1 of the 1998 Agreement shall be amended to reflect an increase in the Base Salary from $500,000 to $650,000, effective as of November 5, 2001. 
  
 2. Section II.6 of the 1998 Agreement shall be amended to reflect an increase in the Modeling Fee from $400,000 to $500,000, effective as of July 29, 2002. 
  
 3. Section IV.5(e) of the 1998 Agreement shall be amended to reflect that twice Executive’s Base Salary shall be equal to $1,300,000.

  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written. 

 
 
	 “Company”
  
 St. John Knits,
Inc.,
 a California corporation
 
	 
	 By:
 	 	 /s/    Bob Gray        
 

	  	 	 Bob Gray
 Chief Executive Officer
 

 
  
  
 
	 “Executive”
 
	 
	 /s/    Kelly A. Gray         
 

	 Kelly A. Gray
### **CHAPTER 15A—RECIPROCAL FIRE PROTECTION AGREEMENTS**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—PROTECTION OF UNITED STATES PROPERTY

Sec.
1856.
Definitions.
1856a.
Authority to enter into reciprocal agreement; waiver of claims; reimbursement; ratification of prior agreements.
1856a–1.
Authority to enter into contracts with State and local governmental entities.
1856b.
Emergency assistance.
1856c.
Service in line of duty.
1856d.
Funds.
1856e.
Reimbursement of fire funds.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—WILDFIRE SUPPRESSION WITH FOREIGN FIRE ORGANIZATION

1856m.
Definitions.
1856n.
Implementation.
1856n–1.
Reciprocal agreements with liability coverage.
1856 o.
Funds.
1856p.
Repealed.
### §607. Records

The Administrator of General Services shall maintain an accurate record of the cost of establishing, maintaining, and operating each motor vehicle pool or system established under section 602 of this title.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1124.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 607 | 40:491(f) (1st sentence). | June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title II, §211(f) (1st sentence), as added Sept. 5, 1950, ch. 849, §5(c), 64 Stat. 583; Sept. 1, 1954, ch. 1211, §2, 68 Stat. 1127. |

Section