alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. IV-11-049

Contact: Victor Dricks (817) 860-8128

 Lara Uselding (817) 276-6519

 

 

 November 21, 2011 

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

NRC ISSUES WATERFORD NUCLEAR PLANT INSPECTION FINDING 

OF LOW TO MODERATE SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has determined that an inspection finding at the 

Waterford 3 nuclear plant involving unplanned radiation exposure to workers is of “white” or 

low to moderate safety significance. The facility, operated by Entergy, is located 25 miles west 

of New Orleans, La.

“This finding was caused by the licensee’s failure to use effective engineering controls 

prior to conducting work during a refueling outage,” Region IV Administrator Elmo Collins said. 

“The NRC will determine the appropriate follow-up actions to ensure this issue is being 

addressed; including additional inspections.” 

In 2009, during a refueling outage, officials failed to properly contain highly radioactive 

cooling water from leaking onto work areas resulting in unplanned radiation doses to workers. 

Although, the radiological doses the workers received were below regulatory limits, NRC 

regulations require that radiation exposures be limited to As Low As Reasonably Achievable 

(ALARA). 

This issue was identified during an NRC inspection in the spring of 2010, to review the 

effectiveness of radiological control practices during the previous refueling outage. NRC staff 

held a regulatory conference with Entergy officials on October 3, during which licensee 

representatives discussed the inspection finding. 

After review of the information, NRC staff has characterized the finding as “white”. NRC 

evaluates performance at plants with a color-coded process which classifies regulatory findings 

as either green, white, yellow, or red, in order of increasing significance. 

The NRC inspection report is available through the agency’s electronic reading room at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and ML112360693. Help in accessing these 

documents is available from the NRC Public Document Room staff by calling 1-800-397-4209.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125

Telephone: (817) 860-8128

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov
###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-13-0001 - Staff Recommendations for Improving the Integration of the Ongoing 10 CFR Part 61 Rulemaking Initiatives

Accession Number: ML12199A422

Date Released: Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML12199A412 - SECY-13-0001 - Staff Recommendations for Improving the Integration of the Ongoing 10 CFR Part 61 Rulemaking Initiatives (8 page(s), 12/31/2012)
    - ML12341A038 - SECY-13-0001 - Enclosure 1 - 10 CFR Part 61 Rulemaking Assignments (1 page(s), 12/31/2012)
    - ML12199A437 - SECY-13-0001 - Enclosure 2 -Summary of Stakeholder Recommendations for Revising Part 61 (3 page(s), 12/31/2012)
    - ML12248A121 - SECY-13-0001 - Enclosure 3 - Summary of Stakeholder Recommendations for Revising Part 61 (9 page(s), 12/31/2012)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 15-0252 

Focus Ready Draft 2/19/2015

ENGINEER: Macek \ DDH 

 

MSDS: Yes Label: No

Gen Eqpt: wear gloves resistant to chemical permeation/ chemical goggles 

or safety glasses/ wear suitable protective clothing/ local exhaust 

ventilation recommended/ general mechanical ventilation recommended

Respirator: an approved dust mask should be worn if dust is generated 

during handling

Health Effects: exposure to any kind of dust is potentially harmful

TLV/PEL:

silica amorphous - precipitated silica 6 mg/m3 OSHA PEL 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10/2015):

Analogs: 

Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: 

Migration to groundwater: Negligible 

PBT rating: P3B1T1 

Health: 1-2 Inhalation 

Eco: 1 No releases to water 
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3A

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: 

Generated by the 09/30/2013 version of ChemSTEER. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

None.

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No 
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 15-0252 

 

 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide 

with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium. 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 15-0252 

 

 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide 

with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium.
### Part C—Continuum of Care Program

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 111–22, div. B, title III, §1301(1), May 20, 2009, 123 Stat. 1680, substituted "Continuum of Care Program" for "Supportive Housing Program" in heading.
#### David Levberg v. Henry D. Schumacher.

Motion granted. Present—Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Smith, JJ.
Enclosure 8: NRC Handouts

Meeting Summary of July 28, 2010 

Public Meeting with NEI

Dated August 4, 2010
Safety Culture Monitoring Panel 

(SCMP)

Public Meeting on NEI 09-07 Pilot 1
Safety Culture Monitoring Panel 

(SCMP)

2

Public Meeting on NEI 09-07 Pilot

Relationship between the line and 

oversight personnel and insights of the 

oversight managers 

Trends in the type of issues brought 

into the ECP, or the increased use of 

the ECP by specific workgroups 

NRC allegation statistics 

Variations in performance trends, 

including human performance and 

equipment reliability indicators 

Oversight area represented on panel; 

HR input on disciplinary cases and 

gnevances 

No trend identified in the quarter; or 

ECP trend not discussed; any ECP 

concerns with HP flags were 

discussed and looked at CAP trends 

Were discussed; were not discussed 

Primary area of input with AFls, 

especially procedure use and quality; 

looked at apparent cause 

determinations and trends; talked 

about individual issues and binned 

according to INPO attributes 
Safety Culture Monitoring Panel 

(SCMP)

Each department tracks this, and then 

the CAP manager assesses any 

possible deltas;

Struggling with thresholds for coding 

the data ; Quantitative Worksheet was 

not used by a SLT who indicated the 

data was difficult to interpret).

Public Meeting on NEI 09-07 Pilot

3
Site Leadership Team (SLT)

; plant manager and department 

leads

Public Meeting on NEI 09-07 Pilot 4
Site Leadership Team (SLT)

Public Meeting on NEI 09-07 Pilot 5

Insights of the offsite safety specialists 

are used 

End result should be an improved 

understanding of where efforts should 

be applied to improve nuclear safety 

culture 

Review is documented and follow-up 

actions are tracked 

Issued an seel in procedure use. 

The AFI identified through the NEI 09-

07 was procedure use, so there 

seems to be consistency between the 

seel process and this one. 

Report did not status prior 

recommendations
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CEO

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Madison River Capital, LLC (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), J. Stephen Vanderwoude, as Managing Director, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                              |  |                                                        
|----------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|/S/    J. STEPHEN
VANDERWOUDE
|Name:                         |  | J. Stephen Vanderwoude                                 
|Title:                        |  | Managing Director, Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer
|Date:                         |  | March 23, 2005                                         



This certification accompanies the
Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PR Specialists, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lawrence Ruden, President of our Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of our Company.



/s/ Lawrence Ruden

Lawrence Ruden

President (Principal Executive Officer)

October 17, 2008
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23
 
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
The Board of Directors
Advanced Communications Group, Inc.
 
    We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-71273, 333-71275, 333-71277 and 333-71283) of our
report dated February 10, 1999 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Advanced Communications Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and
1997 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in
stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years ended December 31,
1998 and 1997, and for the period from inception (June 6, 1996) through December
31, 1996, and the related schedule, which report appears in the December 31,
1998 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Advanced Communications Group, Inc.
 
KPMG LLP
St. Louis, Missouri
March 31, 1999
 
                                       50
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 23-0273

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

ZACKARY MATTHEW MAAS,

 Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT’S 

OPENING BRIEF

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file 

his opening brief, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of 

time to and including September 20, 2024 within which to file his opening 

brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 21 2024

08/21/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0273
### §17705. Approval of Federal Communications Commission

A transfer under this chapter does not require the approval of the Federal Communications Commission except to the extent that the approval of the Commission is necessary under section 17704(3) of this title.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1288.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 17705 | 40:784. | Pub. L. 90–135, title I, §204, Nov. 14, 1967, 81 Stat. 443. |

Section
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 223 (Friday, November 19, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 67737]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25690]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than December 3, 2004.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Sue Costello, Vice President) 
1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30303:
    1. DBT Holding Company, Vidalia, Georgia; to engage de novo through 
its subsidiary, DBW Technologies, LLC, Atlanta, Georgia, in data 
processing activities, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(14)(i) of 
Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 15, 
2004.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 04-25690 Filed 11-18-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
### **CHAPTER 71—CONTRACT DISPUTES**

Sec.
7101.
Definitions.
7102.
Applicability of chapter.
7103.
Decision by contracting officer.
7104.
Contractor's right of appeal from decision by contracting officer.
7105.
Agency boards.
7106.
Agency board procedures for accelerated and small claims.
7107.
Judicial review of agency board decisions.
7108.
Payment of claims.
7109.
Interest.
### SUBCHAPTER II—GRANT PROGRAMS
§ 906.12 Closing the evidentiary portion of the NAO case record. ( a ) At the conclusion of the NAO proceedings, an appellate officer will establish the date upon which the evidentiary portion of the NAO case record will close. Once an appellate officer closes the evidentiary portion of the NAO case record, with or without a hearing, no further submissions or argument will be accepted into the NAO case record.
( b ) NAO in its discretion may reopen the evidentiary portion of the NAO case record or request additional information from the parties at any time prior to final agency action.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 218 (Friday, November 12, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 65465]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25174]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Workforce Investment Act: Native American Employment and Training 
Council

AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, Labor.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (FACA) (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, and section 166(h)(4) of the 
Workforce Investment Act (WIA) [29 U.S.C. 2911(h)(4)], notice is hereby 
given of the next meeting of the Native American Employment and 
Training Council as constituted under WIA.

TIME AND DATE: The meeting will begin at 9 a.m. e.s.t. (eastern 
standard time) on Tuesday, November 30, 2004, and continue until 5 p.m. 
e.s.t. that day. The meeting will reconvene at 9 a.m. e.s.t. on 
Wednesday, December 1, 2004, and continue until approximately 5 p.m. 
e.s.t. on that day. The period from 3 p.m. to 5 p.m. e.s.t. on November 
30, 2004 will be reserved for participation and presentation by members 
of the public. The meeting will adjourn at approximately 5 p.m. on 
Wednesday, December 1, 2004.

PLACE: All sessions will be held in Room C-5515 (1A), FPB, U.S. 
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20210.

STATUS: The meeting will be open to the public. Persons who need 
special accommodations should contact Ms. Brown on (202) 693-3737 by 
November 5, 2004.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The formal agenda will include, but not be 
limited to, the following topics: (1) A further discussion of the 
common measures; (2) the EMILE reporting system; (3) reporting work 
group recommendations; (4) future training needs of section 166 
grantees; and (5) youth forums.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Athena Brown, Chief, Division of 
Indian and Native American Programs, Office of National Programs, 
Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room 
S-4203, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210.

TELEPHONE: (202) 693-3737 (voice) (this is not a toll-free number) or 
1-800-877-8339 (TTY) or speech-to-speech at 1-877-877-8982 (these are 
toll-free numbers).

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of November, 2004.
Thomas M. Dowd,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Employment and Training Administration.
[FR Doc. 04-25174 Filed 11-10-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 4395

_____________________________
T OMMIE R. P OWERS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA D EPARTMENT OF A GRICULTURE / D IVISION OF R ISK M ANAGEMENT , Appellee s

.

_____________________________

On appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims Margaret E. Sojourner , Judge

.
Date of Accident: January 22, 2016

. September 25, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
M AKAR , W INOKUR , and W INSOR , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

William E. Gregory of William E. Gregory, P.A., Miami
, for Appellant.

Joanne M. Prescott of Zimmerman, Kiser & Sutcliffe, P.A., Orlando
, for Appellee s

.
No. IV-12-012

Contact: Victor Dricks (817) 200-1128

 Lara Uselding (817) 200-1519

 

April 10, 2012 

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

NRC ISSUES FORT CALHOUN STATION INSPECTION FINDING

OF HIGH SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has determined that an inspection finding at the 

Fort Calhoun Station involving an electrical breaker fire is of “red” or high safety significance. 

The plant, operated by the Omaha Public Power District, is located 19 miles north of Omaha, 

Neb.

“This finding has high safety significance because it affected multiple safety systems and 

consequently warrants actions to prevent recurrence,” said NRC Region IV Administrator Elmo 

E. Collins.

The finding stems from an NRC special inspection regarding an electrical fire that led to 

the declaration of an Alert at Fort Calhoun on June 7, 2011. The fire started in a replacement 

electrical breaker where poor alignment between components and inadequate maintenance 

increased the electrical resistance on some parts, causing them to heat up and fail. Soot and 

smoke from the resulting fire then knocked out power to a redundant electrical system used for 

distributing power to vital equipment needed for the safe shutdown of the plant. The plant was 

shut down at the time because of flooding along the Missouri River.

The fire resulted in the loss of spent fuel pool cooling for approximately 90 minutes and 

could have resulted in the loss of a safety function or multiple failures in systems used to 

mitigate a severe accident, had one occurred. In the event of a serious accident, operators would 

have had to take compensatory measures to safely shut the plant down. OPPD has taken 

appropriate corrective action to prevent recurrence.

The NRC staff has characterized the finding as “red.” NRC evaluates performance at 

plants with a color-coded process which classifies regulatory findings as either green, white, 

yellow or red, in order of increasing significance. The final significance letter issued to OPPD 

will be available on the NRC webpage at www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV

 1600 E. Lamar Blvd.

 Arlington, TX 76011 - 4125

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov
Fort Calhoun is receiving a special category of increased NRC oversight for plants that 

have been shut down for extended periods and have significant performance issues. The plant 

cannot restart without NRC approval.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the 

EMAIL UPDATES link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to 

subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the 

NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.
Editorial Note on Part 922
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

§ 922.8 Penalties. ( a ) Each violation of the NMSA or the other statutes designating national marine sanctuaries listed in § 922.2(b), any regulation in this part or any permit issued pursuant thereto, is subject to a civil penalty. Each day of a continuing violation constitutes a separate violation.
( b ) Regulations setting forth the procedures governing administrative proceedings for assessment of civil penalties, permit sanctions and denials for enforcement reasons, issuance and use of written warnings, and release or forfeiture of seized property appear at 15 CFR part 904.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2014

d0421 

# Order

Clerk April 28, 2014

148406 & (20)

GE MONEY BANK,

Plaintiff

- Counter

Defendant

- Appellee,

v SC: 148406

COA: 316223

Ingham CC: 11

- 000655

- AV

CONSTANCE HADDAD,

Defendant

- Counter

Plaintiff

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED to permit

the filing of the defendant’s supplementa l appendix, but DENIED in all other respects.

The application for leave to appeal the July 31, 2013 order of the Court of Appeals is

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented

should be reviewed by this Court.
### Division H—Investment for Quality and Innovation

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

This division is comprised of subtitle H, §§198–198C, 198H, 198K, 198O, 198P, and 198S, of title I of Pub. L. 101–610. A prior part H (§12653 et seq.), comprised of subtitle H, §§195–195O, of title I of Pub. L. 101–610, was renumbered subtitle E, §§151–166, of title I of Pub. L. 101–610 by Pub. L. 103–82, §104(b), and transferred to division E (§12611 et seq.) of this subchapter.