alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2022291EN.01003601.xml

| 10.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 291/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 291/36

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 156/2019

of 14 June 2019

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2022/2148]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1984 of 13 December 2018 on recognition of the ‘KZR INiG System’ for demonstrating compliance with the sustainability criteria under Directives 98/70/EC and 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1984 of 13 December 2018 on recognition of the ‘KZR INiG System’ for demonstrating compliance with the sustainability criteria under Directives 98/70/EC and 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 6ax (Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/2317) of Chapter XVII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘6ay. | 32018 D 1984: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1984 of 13 December 2018 on recognition of the ‘KZR INiG System’ for demonstrating compliance with the sustainability criteria under Directives 98/70/EC and 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 317, 14.12.2018, p. 25).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘6ay.

32018 D 1984: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1984 of 13 December 2018 on recognition of the ‘KZR INiG System’ for demonstrating compliance with the sustainability criteria under Directives 98/70/EC and 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 317, 14.12.2018, p. 25).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1984 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 15 June 2019, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 14 June 2019.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 317, 14.12.2018, p. 25.

1

(*)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*

---
§ 909.1 Definition of marine debris for the purposes of the Marine Debris Research, Prevention, and Reduction Act. ( a ) *Marine debris.* For the purposes of the Marine Debris Research, Prevention, and Reduction Act (33 U.S.C. 1951-1958 (2006)) only, marine debris is defined as any persistent solid material that is manufactured or processed and directly or indirectly, intentionally or unintentionally, disposed of or abandoned into the marine environment or the Great Lakes.
( b ) NOAA and the Coast Guard have jointly promulgated the definition of marine debris in this part. Coast Guard's regulation may be found in 33 CFR 151.3000.
[74 FR 45560, Sept. 3, 2009]
### Part H—Community-Based Justice Grants for Prosecutors
### §546. Contractor inventories

Subject to regulations of the Administrator of General Services, an executive agency may authorize a contractor or subcontractor with the agency to retain or dispose of contractor inventory.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1089.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 546 | 40:484(f). | June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title II, §203(f), 63 Stat. 386. |

Section
#### § 904.208 Extensions of time.

If appropriate and justified, the Judge may grant any request for an extension of time. Requests for extensions of time must, except in extraordinary circumstances, be made in writing.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ProUroCareMedical Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Richard C. Carlson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, RichardB. Thon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of ourknowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, that:

 

(1)           theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Richard C. Carlson  |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Richard C. Carlson      |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |
| October 22, 2008   |   |
|                    |   |
|                    |   |
| /s/ Richard. B. Thon    |   |
| Richard B. Thon         |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |
| October 22, 2008   |   |

 

----
Editorial Note on Subpart E of Part 9701
Editorial Note: At 73 FR 58435, Oct. 7, 2008, the application of subpart E to part 9701 was rescinded.

§ 9701.522 Exceptions to arbitration awards. ( a ) ( 1 ) In the case of awards involving the exercise of management rights or the duty to bargain under §§ 9701.511 and 9701.518, either party to arbitration under this subpart may file with the HSLRB an exception to any arbitrator's award. The HSLRB may take such action and make such recommendations concerning the award as is consistent with this subpart.
( 2 ) In the case of awards not involving the exercise of management rights or the duty to bargain under §§ 9701.511 and 9701.518, either party may file exceptions to an arbitration award with the Authority pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 7122 (which is not waived for the purpose of this subpart but which is modified to apply to arbitration awards under this section) and the Authority's regulations.
( 3 ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a)(2) of this section, exceptions to awards relating to a matter described in § 9701.521(f) may not be filed with the Authority.
( b ) If no exception to an arbitrator's award is filed under paragraph (a) of this section during the 30-day period beginning on the date of such award, the award is final and binding. Either party must take the actions required by an arbitrator's final award. The award may include the payment of back pay (as provided under 5 U.S.C. 5596 and 5 CFR part 550, subpart H).
( c ) Nothing in this section prevents the HSLRB from determining its own jurisdiction without regard to whether any party has raised a jurisdictional issue.
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of American Energy Production, Inc. (the
“Company”), on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Charles Bitters, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b)
and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes
Oxley Act of 2002,





i.   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





ii.   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





March
      31, 2008
                  By:
                  /s/ Charles
      BittersCharles
      BittersChief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Surface warfare**
 
2002
Spring
Summer
Fall
2003
Winter
Spring
Summer
Fall
2004
Winter
Spring
Summer
 
2006
Winter
Spring
Summer
Fall
2007
Winter
Spring
Summer
Fall | Fold  Out
 
 
SuDoc Number:D 207.18:
Item Number:0400-D (online)
CGP systemNumber:000570187
 
October 8, 2019
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 219 (Monday, November 15, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 65520]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25285]

[[Page 65520]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Rural Housing Service

Rural Business-Cooperative Service

Rural Utilities Service

Farm Service Agency

7 CFR Part 1955

RIN 0560-AG78

2002 Farm Bill Regulations--General Credit Provisions; Correction

AGENCIES: Rural Housing Service, Rural Business-Cooperative Service, 
Rural Utilities Services, and Farm Service Agency, USDA.

ACTION: Final rule; correcting amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects the final regulations published in the 
Federal Register on February 18, 2003, implementing certain provisions 
of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (2002 Act).

DATES: Effective Date: February 18, 2003.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Constance Beckwith, Senior Loan 
Officer, USDA/FSA/DAFLP/LSPMD/STOP 0523, Washington DC 20250-0523; 
telephone 202-720-9769; Facsimile: 202-690-1196; E-mail: [email protected]. Persons with disabilities who require 
alternative means for communication (Braille, large print, audio tape, 
etc.) should contact the USDA Target Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice 
and TDD).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Section 5310 of the 2002 Act changed the definition of qualified 
beginning farmer or rancher by increasing the acres of land that these 
applicants could own to a maximum of 30 (instead of 25) percent of the 
average farm or ranch size in the county.

Need for Correction

    As published, the final regulations amended the definition of 
``Beginning farmer or rancher'' in 7 CFR 762.102, 1941.4 and 1943.4 to 
comply with the requirements of the 2002 Act. The definition of 
``Beginning farmer or rancher'' is also included in 7 CFR 1955.103; 
however, the necessary amendment was inadvertently not included in the 
February 18, 2003, final rule.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1955

    Government acquired property, Sale of government acquired property, 
Surplus government property.

0
Accordingly, chapter XVIII, title 7, Code of Federal Regulations is 
corrected as follows:

PART 1955--PROPERTY MANAGEMENT

0
1. The authority citation for part 1955 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 7 U.S.C. 1989, 42 U.S.C. 1480.

Subpart C--Disposal of Inventory Property

0
2. Amend Sec.  1955.103 by removing the number ``25'' from the first 
sentence of paragraph (5) of the definition ``Beginning farmer or 
rancher'' and adding in its place the number ``30.''

    Dated: November 5, 2004.
Gilbert Gonzales,
Acting Under Secretary for Rural Development.
    Dated: November 3, 2004.
J.B. Penn,
Under Secretary for Farm and Foreign Agricultural Services.
[FR Doc. 04-25285 Filed 11-12-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-05-P
```
### SUBCHAPTER II—PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE DEVELOPMENT
### §6307. Contracts with Federal Government-owned establishments and availability of appropriations

An order or contract placed with a Federal Government-owned establishment for work, material, or the manufacture of material pertaining to an approved project is deemed to be an obligation in the same manner that a similar order or contract placed with a commercial manufacturer or private contractor is an obligation. Appropriations remain available to pay an obligation to a Federal Government-owned establishment just as appropriations remain available to pay an obligation to a commercial manufacturer or private contractor.

(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3806.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6307 | 41:23. | June 5, 1920, ch. 240, (last par. under heading "Purchase of Articles Manufactured at Government Arsenals"), 41 Stat. 975. |
| | | July 1, 1922, ch. 259, (1st proviso on p. 812), 42 Stat. 812. |

Section

The words "heretofore or" are omitted as obsolete. The word "hereafter" is omitted as unnecessary because the provision is restated as permanent law rather than as part of a fiscal year appropriation.
§ 8a.535 Effect of state or local law or other requirements. ( a ) *Prohibitory requirements.* The obligation to comply with §§ 8a.500 through 8a.550 is not obviated or alleviated by the existence of any State or local law or other requirement that imposes prohibitions or limits upon employment of members of one sex that are not imposed upon members of the other sex.
( b ) *Benefits.* A recipient that provides any compensation, service, or benefit to members of one sex pursuant to a State or local law or other requirement shall provide the same compensation, service, or benefit to members of the other sex.
Jntmatbnul ni ao inn1

August 10, 2011

ATTN: Document-Control Desk

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Docket No. 40-9086

Subject: Submittal of Responses to Requests for Additional Information (RAI)

TAC L32739

To Whom it May Concern,

The following documents are provided as a response to the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission

RAls pertaining to the International Isotopes Fluorine Products Inc. December 30, 2009

application to license a depleted uranium hexafluoride de-conversion and fluorine extraction

process facility.

(1) Official Responses to Accident Analysis RAI Follow-Up Questions - Security Related

Information.

Please contact me by phone at 208 524-5300 or email at iimiller@intisoid.com if you have any

questions regarding this letter or require additional information.

Sincerely,

John J. Miller, CHP

Radiation Safety Officer

JJM-2011-44

Enclosure as Stated

cc: Dr. Matthew Bartlett

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Mail Stop E2C40M

6003 Executive Blvd.

Rockville, MD 20852

4137 Commerce Circle, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83401

Phone: 208-524-5300, 800-699-3108 Fax: 208-424-1411

Website: www.intisoid.com \A k. s' J
#### Smith et al. v. Howard et al.

May 14, 1948.

Rodes K. Myers for appellant.

G. D. Millikin and G. D. Millikin, Jr., for appellee.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Rees

Affirming.

The appeal is from a judgment in favor of the appellees setting aside deeds to two small tracts of land in Warren County which were executed to the appellant Grace Howard Smith by her aged father. In a supplemental judgment an award was made to Mrs. Smith for services rendered in caring for her father during the latter years of his life. On this appeal Mrs. Smith is insisting that the jury, to which an issue out of chancery was submitted, was not justified in finding that her father was mentally incapacitated at the time he executed the deeds. It is insisted also that incompetent evidence was admitted, and that errors were committed in submitting the issue out of chancery to a jury.

We are met at the threshold of the case by a question of practice, namely, the effect of the failure of the losing party to file a motion and grounds for a new trial. The appellees contend that, since no motion and grounds for a new trial were filed by the appellants, the only question reviewable on the appeal is the sufficiency of the pleadings to support the judgment. We deem it unnecessary to enter upon an extensive discussion of the case because we think this contention is sound. Counsel for the appellants have sought diligently to show that a motion and grounds for a new trial were filed in due time, but the transcript of the record fails *444to disclose that they were ever filed. In the case of Shannon v. Stratton *&*Terstegge, 144 Ky. 26, 137 S. W. 850, it was held that where an issue out of chancery is tried by a jury it is governed by the same rules as govern in ordinary actions, and in the absence of a motion for a new trial the appellant presents nothing for review except the sufficiency of the pleadings to support the judgment. This is true even where a jury is waived and the case is submitted to the court. Whitmer v. Cardwell, 194 Ky. 351, 238 S. W. 1048; Hickey v. Glass, 285 Ky. 848, 149 S. W. 2d 535. In the case at bar the pleadings amply support the judgment. Furthermore, we are convinced from our examination of the whole record that the chancellor made a proper disposition of the case when he allowed Mrs. Smith the sum of $1,500 in the supplemental judgment on her counterclaim.

Judgment affirmed.
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 21

- 00071

- CR

IN RE BENJAMIN MORRISON

Original Proceeding

From the 19th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010

- 997

- C1

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Benjamin Morrison ’s petition for writ of mandamus , filed on March 25,

2021, is denied.

MATT JOHNSON

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Neill , and

Justice Johnson

Petition d enied

Opinion delivered and filed March 31, 2021

Do not publish

[OT 06 ]
### **CHAPTER 37—AWARDING OF CONTRACTS**

Sec.
3701.
Basis of award and rejection.
3702.
Sealed bids.
3703.
Competitive proposals.
3704.
Post-award debriefings.
3705.
Pre-award debriefings.
3706.
Encouragement of alternative dispute resolution.
3707.
Antitrust violations.
3708.
Protests.
§ 904.303 Notice of intent to deny permit (NIDP). ( a ) [Reserved]
( b ) The NIDP will set forth the basis for its issuance and any opportunity for a hearing.
( c ) NOAA will not refund any fee(s) submitted with a permit application if a NIDP is issued.
( d ) A NIDP may be issued in conjunction with or independent of a NOPS.
[71 FR 12448, Mar. 10, 2006, as amended at 87 FR 38941, June 30, 2022]
§ 1500.83 Effect of termination or amendment. Unless otherwise expressly provided by the Secretary, the termination of this Order, or the issuance of any amendment, shall not: ( a ) Affect or waive any right, duty, obligation or liability which shall have arisen, or which may thereafter arise in connection with any provision of this Order;
( b ) Release or extinguish any violation of this Order; or
( c ) Affect or impair any rights or remedies of the United States, or of the Secretary or of any other persons, with respect to any such violation.
BISNIS Trades and Tenders, July 21, 1997

----

FOCUS: RUSSIAN FAR EAST
THE BUSINESS INFORMATION SERVICE FOR THE NEWLY INDEPENDENT STATES(BISNIS) HAS CREATED THE BISNIS TRADES AND TENDERS ELECTRONIC NEWSLETTER TOHELP U.S. COMPANIES FIND BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES IN THE EXPANDING MARKETS OFTHE NEWLY INDEPENDENT STATES (NIS) OF THE FORMER SOVIET UNION.
THESE OPPORTUNITIES ARE PROVIDED SOLELY AS AN INFORMATIONAL SERVICEAND DO NOT REPRESENT AN ENDORSEMENT BY THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE. VERIFICATION OF LEADS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE READER. BISNIS MAYCONSIDER OTHER PRIVATE SECTOR-GENERATED TRADE LEADS AND TENDERS, INELECTRONIC FORM ONLY, AND PUBLISH ON A SPACE-AVAILABLE BASIS. PLEASE SEND YOUR LEADSTO [email protected]
=====================================================================INDEX OF LEADS:
LEAD #1: Iodine - Khabarovsk, Russia
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region III

2443 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. III-12-005

Contact: Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil (630) 829-9663

January 31, 2012

E-Mail: OPA3.RegionIII@nrc.gov 

NRC BEGINS SPECIAL INSPECTION AT BYRON NUCLEAR PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has started a Special Inspection to review the 

circumstances around the loss of offsite power that led to a Unit 2 reactor shutdown on Jan. 30 at the 

Byron nuclear power plant. 

The two-unit plant is operated by Exelon Generation Co. and is located in Byron, Ill., about 17 

miles southwest of Rockford.

The special inspection team began work today and will look into how plant equipment responded 

to the loss of offsite power. They will review the sequence of events, evaluate the facts and 

circumstances, and review the plants actions surrounding the incident. The team will also review the 

plant’s evaluation of what happened, their plan for addressing the cause of the event, and the 

implementation of their corrective actions.

Unit 2 remains in a safe and stable shutdown condition and the diesel generators continue 

to supply power to the plant as planned for this type of incident. There was a steam release from 

the non-nuclear side of the plant with trace amounts of tritium. This type of steam release is used by 

nuclear power plants to release pressure in order to maintain the plant in a stable condition. Doses to the

public from this type of release are significantly below even the most stringent Federal protective limits 

and, therefore, do not pose a risk to public health and safety.

The NRC’s special inspection report will be available within 45 days of the inspection’s 

completion of through the NRC RIII Office of Public Affairs or through the Agencywide Documents 

Access and Management System (ADAMS) at the NRC website.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

TIMOTHY FONSECA

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 9

- 00 227

- C R

Appeal from the

243 rd District Court

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 201 80D02567 )

O R D E R

On September 5, 2019, Appellant filed a notice of appeal in the above

- styled and numbered

cause. The notice of appeal was late, but it was filed within fifteen days after the deadline for the

notice of appeal to be filed. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an

appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by TEX.R.APP.P.

26.1 but within the fifteen

- day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension

of time. See Verburgt v. Dor ner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). However, an appellant must

still provide the Court with a reasonable explanation for the late filing of the notice of appeal before

the Court may accept the appeal.

On September 6, 2019, Appellant filed a motion for ex tension of time to file the notice of

appeal in which he provided a reasonable explanation for the delay. Accordingly, Appellant's

motion for extension of time is GRANTED. Further, the record is now due on or before October

2, 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 9 th day of September , 20 1 9

.

PER CURIAM