alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ology and Codes Freeze / Thaw

Concrete Techn

Weathering Regions
North Lanes Constructed With 

Non Air-Entrained Portland 

Cement

Bad Surface Scaling After 2 

Years

South Lanes Constru

Air-Entrained Portla

No Scaling After 

Excellent

Concrete

Effect of W/C Ratio on Concrete Properties

0 0.25 0.5 0.75 

Poor

Concrete

Property

Water-to-Cement Ratio
.25 .30 .35 .40 .45 .50 .55 .60 .65 

Water Cement Ratio -

By weight Lb. Water / Lb. Portland Ce
Characteristics of an 

adequate air void syst

z Spacing factor less than 0z Specific surface ~600 in

2/ 

more

z Voids per linear inch - 1-1

times the percentage of a
Air Content for Durab

z Approximately 9% of air in 

mortar fraction of the conshould provide the recommendd i 

e

d air content 

durability, regardless of chin cement, maximum aggrsize, consistency or type oaggregate
Total Target Air Conte

for Concrete

Nominal max. Aggregate Size,in.

Severe Exposure 

Moderate Exposure 

MilExp

3/8 7-1/2 6 4-1

Project specifications usually allow within -1 ttarget value

1⁄2 7 5-1/2 43⁄4 6 5 3-11 6 4-1/2 3 1-1/2 5-1/2 4-1/2 2-1

Air-Void System Analy

Void System Analy

z Measure air contentz Determine paramete

air-void system void system

z Evaluate durabilityz Predict future 

performance
Low Air Content
Air-Void Clusters at Void Clusters at 

Interface
Freeze-Thaw Resistan

Thaw Resistan

z Air-Void System (ASTM C z ASTM C 666z ASTM C 672








Factors Affecting F/T of 

Aggregates (D Aggregates (D-Cracking

Cracking

z Saturated conditionsz Coarse aggregate

 Pore structures Composition Particle size

z Pavement Design

 Sub-surface drainage


Avoidance of F/T Damag

z Use properly air-entrained conz Strength of the concretez W/CM ratioz Curing

-followed by drying perio

followed by drying perio

z Minimum exposure to moisture

 Well draining sub base Sloped for proper drainage Sealer
Exterior Concrete Mix

z w/c= 0.45z Cement Content 564 lb./cz Air entrainment ~ 6%z Good drainagez Proper finishing and low s

mix

z Curing followed by dryingz Avoid salt use for the first 
F/T Scaling

z Air void systemz W/Cz Aggregates

 Cherts (popouts)

z Bleeding

 P t fi i hi Prema

ture fi

nishing

 Weakened alyer Overworked slabs Baptizing

z Drainagez Curingz Late fall construction
Questions
#### Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Mayhew et al.

May 4, 1948.

Rehearing denied June 22, 1948.

C. D. Carpenter, Craft & Stanfill, C. S. Landrum and C. E. Rice, Jr. for appellant.

Bailey P. Wootton and Don A. Ward for appellees.

Opinion op the Court by

Van Sant, Commissioner

Reversing.

The action was instituted by appellant against appellees to condemn a railroad right of way through land in Perry County, Kentucky, title to which was claimed by all of the individual appellees, and a mortgage on which was held by the corporate appellee, Citizens State *794Bank. An appeal was perfected in the Circuit Court from the order of the County Court allowing $4500.00 as the value of tract No. 2, which is the only one affected by this appeal. The case was set for trial for the tenth day of October, 1946, at which time appellant suggested the deaths of the defendants, Marion Cornett, Jane Caudill, and Susan Beams, and moved the Court to continue the case until the action could be revived against the heirs of the deceased parties. The Court overruled the motion and entered upon the trial of the case, which resulted in a verdict for “the defendants,” without naming them, in the sum of $9,000.00.

The first ground relied on for reversal, and the only one it is necessary or proper for us to consider, is that the Court erred in ordering the case to be tried before it was revived against the heirs of the deceased defendants. The record shows that the deceased defendants were claiming an interest in the tract of land in question. Whether these claimants had an interest in the land or not, they were entitled to their day in court, and upon their deaths their heirs succeeded to such right. Whatever interest, if any, the deceased had in the land descended to the heirs, and the taking of such interest in an action to which they were not made parties would be taking the property without due process of law, in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, and Sections 13 and 242 of the Constitution of Kentucky.

The judgment is reversed for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
NRC ANNOUNCES OPPORTUNITY FOR HEARING ON APPLICATION TO RENEW 

OPERATING LICENSE FOR DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 

 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has announced the opportunity to request a hearing on 

an application to renew the operating license for the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station. 

 The Davis-Besse plant is a pressurized-water reactor located 21 miles southeast of Toledo, 

Ohio. The licensee, FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co., submitted the renewal application Aug. 30, 

and its current operating license expires on April 22, 2017. 

 The NRC staff has determined that the application contains sufficient information for the 

agency to formally “docket,” or file, the application and begin its technical review. Docketing the 

application does not preclude requesting additional information as the review proceeds; nor does it 

indicate whether the Commission will grant the application. 

 The deadline for requesting a hearing is 60 days following publication of a notice in the 

Federal Register, expected shortly. By that date, petitions must be filed by anyone whose interest 

may be affected by the license renewal and who wishes to participate as a party in the proceeding. 

The notice includes detailed instructions for requesting a hearing through the NRC’s E-filing 

system’s electronic submittal page at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html. For specific 

guidance and instructions on public involvement in hearings visit http://www.nrc.gov/aboutnrc/regulatory/adjudicatory/hearing.html. 

 Information about the license renewal process can be found on the NRC website at 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal.html. The Davis-Besse renewal application 

is online at http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications/davis-besse.html. 

### 

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should contact 

the Office of Public Affairs beforehand. 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-191 October 26, 2010
#### In the Matter of the Assessment of the Cost of the Improvement of Edgewood Avenue, in the City of Mount Vernon. City of Mount Vernon, Appellant; Philip Alpert et al., Respondents.

In our opinion the assessment was void, despite the subsequent confirmation thereof by the council, by reason of the fact that other land within the district of assessment, as fixed by the council’s ordinances authorizing the improvement and accepting the improvement as complete, adopted prior to the making of the assessment, was omitted from the assessment roll by the commissioner. (See *Hassen*v. *City of Rochester,*65 N. Y. 516; 67 N. Y. 528; *Matter of Turfler,*44 Barb. 46; *Doughty*v. *Hope,*3 Denio 594, affd. 1 N. Y. 79.) Whether the ground for the declaration of invalidity be stated merely as being the unlawful acts of the commissioner of assessment and taxation, or as being total lack of jurisdiction of the council to make the levy and assessment (see Mount Vernon City Charter, §§ 231, 232; L. 1922, ch. 490), the court nevertheless may vacate the assessment if it be void. *(People ex rel. Schick*v. *Marvin, 271*N. Y. 219; 249 App. Div. 293, affd. 275 N. Y. 587.) The objections filed by respondents, *854in connection with the hearing for the confirmation by the common council of the assessment by the commissioner, sufficiently stated the same grounds which were presented to the court and, therefore, the court was not without jurisdiction by virtue of section 232 of "the charter. No element of estoppel is presented by the claim that respondents themselves applied for the construction of the improvement and that their property may be the only one to benefit therefrom. The council, by legislative action, has determined that parcels other than that of the respondents will be benefited, and, under the authorities above cited, the council’s confirmation of the assessment is insufficient to change that legislative determination. Present — Johnston, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ. [195 Misc. 314.] [See *post,*p. 1045.]
NRC MEETING NOV. 16 IN ROCKVILLE, MD., TO DISCUSS 

NEW REACTOR CONSTRUCTION ASSESSMENT PROCESS 

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will host a panel discussion in Rockville, Md., on 

Monday, Nov. 16, to discuss the agency’s process for assessing licensee performance during new 

reactor construction efforts. 

 The NRC will hold the meeting from 8:30 to 11:30 a.m. in the Bethesda North Marriott 

Hotel and Conference Center, 5701 Marinelli Road in Rockville. Senior NRC managers, along 

with representatives from the nuclear industry and state government, will discuss the 

development of the agency’s construction assessment process. The group will also examine the 

Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) used for operating nuclear power plants and discuss how 

portions of the ROP’s assessment process could be included in construction assessment. 

 The public is invited to participate in the meeting, which will include a moderated 

question-and-answer session. A teleconference line will be available for members of the public. 

For more information or to register for the meeting, please contact Kevin Mattern in advance of 

the meeting at (301)-415-6622 or kevin.mattern@nrc.gov. 

### 

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand. 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 09-183 November 10, 2009
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-12-0145 - Denial of Petition for Rulemaking (PRM 70-9) - American Physical Society

Accession Number: ML12272A109

Date Released: Friday, May 31, 2013

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML12272A193 - SECY-12-0145 - Denial of Petition for Rulemaking (PRM-70-9) - American Physical Society. (6 page(s), 10/25/2012)
    - ML12272A196 - SECY-12-0145 - Enclosure 1: FRN: Petition for Rulemaking Denial:  Nuclear Proliferation Assessment in Licensing Process for Enrichment or Reprocessing Facilities PRM-70-9/NRC-2010-0372. (52 page(s), 10/25/2012)
    - ML103260300 - 2010/11/10-Petition for Rulemaking submitted on Behalf of The American Physical Society, Francis Slakey, on PRM-70-9, regarding NRC Rule Change. (7 page(s), 11/10/2010)
    - ML12272A195 - SECY-12-0145 - Enclosure 3: Denial Letter to Petitioner PRM 70-9 (3 page(s), 10/25/2012)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains documents other than rules or

proposed rules that are applicable to the

public. Notices of hearings and investigations,

committee meetings, agency decisions and

rulings, delegations of authority, filing of

petitions and applications and agency

statements of organization and functions are

examples of documents appearing in this

section.

Notices Federal Register

122 

Vol. 84, No. 11 

Wednesday, January 16, 2019 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

[Public Notice: 10653] 

Notice of Determinations; Culturally 

Significant Objects Imported for 

Exhibition—Determinations: ‘‘The Lure 

of Dresden: Bellotto at the Court of 

Saxony’’ Exhibition 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the 

following determinations: I hereby 

determine that certain objects to be 

included in the exhibition ‘‘The Lure of 

Dresden: Bellotto at the Court of 

Saxony,’’ imported from abroad for 

temporary exhibition within the United 

States, are of cultural significance. The 

objects are imported pursuant to loan 

agreements with the foreign owners or 

custodians. I also determine that the 

exhibition or display of the exhibit 

objects at the Kimbell Art Museum, Fort 

Worth, Texas, from on or about 

February 10, 2019, until on or about 

April 28, 2019, and at possible 

additional exhibitions or venues yet to 

be determined, is in the national 

interest. I have ordered that Public 

Notice of these determinations be 

published in the Federal Register. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Elliot Chiu, Attorney-Adviser, Office of 

the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of 

State (telephone: 202–632–6471; email: 

section2459@state.gov). The mailing 

address is U.S. Department of State, 

L/PD, SA–5, Suite 5H03, Washington, 

DC 20522–0505. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

foregoing determinations were made 

pursuant to the authority vested in me 

by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 

985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 

12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign 

Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 

1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 

6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 

Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, 

and Delegation of Authority No. 236–3 

of August 28, 2000. 

Marie Therese Porter Royce, 

Assistant Secretary Educational and Cultural 

Affairs, Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 2019–00068 Filed 1–15–19; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710–05–P 


khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
NRC NAMES NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Atlanta have selected Michelle P. Catts as 

the senior resident inspector at the Brunswick nuclear power plant. The plant, operated by Duke 

Energy, is near Southport, N.C., about 22 miles south of Wilmington.

“Michelle Catts has the experience and commitment to 

safety to help ensure that the Brunswick plant operates in a way 

that protects public health and safety,” said NRC Regional 

Administrator Victor McCree.

Catts earned a bachelor’s degree in nuclear engineering 

from North Carolina State University. Before joining the NRC in 

2003, she worked in the fuels group for Exelon Corp., which 

operates several nuclear power plants.

She joined the NRC as a reactor engineer in the NRC’s Region I office in King of 

Prussia, Pa. After completing a rigorous inspector qualification program, she worked as a reactor 

inspector in that office. She then became a resident inspector at Palo Verde Nuclear Generating 

Station in Arizona. Before being named the senior resident inspector at the Brunswick plant, she 

was the senior resident inspector at Indian Point 2 in New York. 

She joins Resident Inspector Mark Schweig at the Brunswick plant. The Brunswick NRC 

resident inspectors can be reached at 910-457-9531.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two resident inspectors. They 

serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting regular inspections, monitoring 

significant work activities, and interacting with plant workers and the public.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No: II-12-055

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416

 August 30, 2012

E-mail: OPA2.Resource@nrc.gov
### SERVED: March 27, 2013

,...., ___**·:-~,--** r---

; • ' j i**~** ,'• -f'.j I ! ';- 

### U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONJ-;> 

## ;;·.£..:-:::· i ' '**~** '"',.. - 

### - 

### OFFICE OF HEARINGS
.. · '··;
._,...,j :·,,**;'~:** 

### WASHINGTON, DC --,,] '"n

### 1 _ I ; l.. '.I l 1 ;. _) 

### 2: 3 8
In The Matter Of: HELOAIR, INC. Respondent ) ) ) ) ) 

### Docket No. FAA-2012-0472 Case No. 2011-EA-210018



### ORDERDISMISSING PROCEEDING OnMarch 14, 2013, a Notice ofHearing Location was filed. On March 27,2013, the FAA filed a Withdrawal ofComplaint stating that the parties had reached a settlement. Afterreviewing all relevant caselaw, decisions, regulations, statutory authority, andbeing fully advised; 

### IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. 

### The Pre-Hearing Status Conference set for Thursday, March28, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. Eastern time is cancelled. 2. The Hearing setto begin on April17, 2013, at the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Richmond, VA is cancelled. 3. Pursuantto 14 C.P.R.§ 13.215, the FAAhas withdrawn its Complaint, and this proceeding is dismissed with prejudice.

ivan nistrative Law Judge
Attachment: Service List•' FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0472 (Civil Penalty Action) SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL and FAX ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001
ZacheryM. Berman, Esq. 

### Complainant's Counsel Office oftheRegional Counsel, AEA-7 Eastern Region Federal Aviation Administration 1 Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 TEL: 718-553-3258 FAX: 718-995-5699 John G. Butler, III, Esq. 

### Respondent's Counsel SANDS ANDERSON PC Bank ofAmerica Center 1111 East Main Street, Suite 2400 Richmond VA 23219 TEL: 804-648-1636 FAX: 804-783-7291 Judge J.E. Sullivan 

### US. Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2132 FAJ(: 202-366-7536 ONE COPY

Whit Baldwin, President Heloair, Inc., 

### Respondent 5721 Gulfstream Road Richmond, VA 23250

1 For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
### §3147. Suspension of this subchapter during a national emergency

The President may suspend the provisions of this subchapter during a national emergency.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1153.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3147 | 40:276a–5. | Mar. 3, 1931, ch. 411, §6, 46 Stat. 1494; Aug. 30, 1935, ch. 825, 49 Stat. 1013. |

Section

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Termination of War and Emergencies

Joint Res. July 25, 1947, ch. 327, §3, 61 Stat. 451, provided that in the interpretation of former 40 U.S.C. 276a–5, the date July 25, 1947, was to be deemed to be the date of termination of any state of war theretofore declared by Congress and of the national emergencies proclaimed by the President on September 8, 1939, and May 27, 1941.
§ 325.4 Calculating time periods. ( a ) When these regulations require action to be taken within a fixed time period, and the last day of the time period falls on a non-working day, the time period shall be extended to the next working day.
( b ) The day after an application is deemed submitted shall be deemed the first of the days within which the Secretary must make a determination on the application.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2289 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2289

    To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to make grants for 
projects to construct fences or other barriers to prevent public access 
 to tracks and other hazards of fixed guideway systems in residential 
                                 areas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 2, 2003

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to make grants for 
projects to construct fences or other barriers to prevent public access 
 to tracks and other hazards of fixed guideway systems in residential 
                                 areas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Railway Safety Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. PUBLIC ACCESS TO TRACKS AND OTHER HAZARDS OF FIXED GUIDEWAY 
              SYSTEMS IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS.

    (a) Grants.--The Secretary of Transportation may make grants to the 
operator of a rail fixed guideway mass transportation system that is 
subject to regulation by the Federal Transit Administration or the 
Federal Railroad Administration for projects to construct fences or 
other barriers to prevent public access to tracks and other facilities 
of the system that may present a hazard in a residential area.
    (b) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of a project 
carried out with amounts made available under this section shall not 
exceed 50 percent.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated out of the Highway Trust Fund $5,000,000 for fiscal year 
2003 to carry out this section.
    (d) Applicability of Title 23.--Funds authorized by this section 
shall be available for obligation in the same manner as if such funds 
were apportioned under chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code; 
except that subsection (b) shall apply with respect to the Federal 
share and such funds shall remain available until expended.
                                 <all>
```