alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2
 **CERTIFICATION**
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Brand Intermediate Holdings, Inc. (the åCompanyæ) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the Reportæ), I, Jeffrey W. Peterson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 3.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
 4.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 
 
 Date: November 15, 2004/s/ Jeffrey W. PetersonJeffrey W. PetersonChief Financial Officer and Vice President,Finance 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 224 (Monday, November 22, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 67945]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25852]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Glazing Industry Secretariat Committee

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 28, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Glazing Industry 
Secretariat Committee (``GISC'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of 
the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of 
its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for 
the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: Glazing 
Industry Secretariat Committee, Topeka, KS. The nature and scope of 
GISC's standards development activities are: To function as the 
Secretariat with oversight and administrative responsibilities for ANSI 
Standard Z97.1, American National Standard for Safety Glazing Materials 
Used in Buildings--Safety Performance Specifications and Methods of 
Test, establishing the specifications and methods of tests for safety 
properties of safety glazing materials (glazing materials designed to 
promote safety and to reduce or minimize the likelihood of cutting and 
piercing injuries when the glazing materials are broken by human 
contact) as used for all building and architectural purposes.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-25852 Filed 11-19-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Summary of Meeting Between the Utility Water Act Group (UWAG) and EPA Staff

October 4, 2011 

List of Attendees

Greg Schaner, EPA 

Erika Farris, EPA 

Melissa Bouotene, EPA 

Janet Goodwin, EPA 

Brooks Smith, H&W for UWAG 

Miranda Yost, H&W for UWAG 

Jesse Pritts, EPA 

Pete Ford, EPA 

Mary Ellen Levine, EPA 

Jeremy Bauer, EPA 

Summary of Meeting

During the meeting, UWAG discussed several proposed permit provisions that were problematic 

for linear utility construction, including requirements relating to the following: 

• Control stormwater discharges within the site; 

• Minimize soil compaction; 

• Minimize exposure of building materials; 

• Stabilization of access roads and equipment pads; 

• Buffers; 

• Perimeter controls; and 

• Stabilization of construction entrances and exits.
KENNETH E HAMMETT

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 2099

______ _______________________/

Opinion filed September 20, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Columbia County

. Wesley R. Douglas , Judge

.

K e nneth E Hammett, pro se , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B. L. THOMAS , ROWE, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR
§ 754.7 Petitions for the imposition of monitoring or controls on recyclable metallic materials; Public hearings. ( a ) *Scope.* Section 7(c) of the Export Administration Act of 1979 (EAA) provides for the filing and review of petitions seeking the imposition of monitoring or controls on recyclable metallic materials.
( b ) *Eligibility for filing petitions.* Any entity, including a trade association, firm or certified or recognized union or group of workers, which is representative of an industry or a substantial segment of an industry which processes metallic materials capable of being recycled with respect to which an increase in domestic prices or a domestic shortage, either of which results from increased exports, has or may have a significant adverse effect on the national economy or any sector thereof, may submit a written petition to BIS requesting the monitoring of exports, or the imposition of export controls, or both, with respect to such materials.
( c ) *Public hearings.* The petitioner may also request a public hearing. Public hearings may also be requested by an entity, including a trade association, firm, or certified or recognized union or group of workers, which is representative of an industry or a substantial segment of an industry which processes, produces or exports the metallic materials which are the subject of a petition.
( d ) *Address.* Submit petitions pursuant to section 7(c) of the EAA, via courier, to: Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Room 2099B, Washington, DC 20230.
[61 FR 12844, Mar. 25, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 25467, May 9, 1997; 73 FR 38, Jan. 2, 2008; 78 FR 13470, Feb. 28, 2013]
**Powerful Partnership Page**
-  PresidentClinton Establishes NSTC Working Group on International Energy Research,Development, Demonstration, and Deployment Sep 14, 1999
-  PowerfulPartnerships: PCAST Study Urges U.S. Investment in Clean and EfficientTechnologies  Aug 19, 1999
-  Powerful Partnerships:A Synthesis of a Report by the President's Committee of Advisors on Scienceand Technology  *(PDF 489kb)* Aug 6, 1999
-  PowerfulPartnerships: The Federal Role in International Cooperation on Energy Innovation.*(PDF 1.3mb)* Aug 2, 1999
-  VicePresident Releases PCAST Report *Powerful Partnerships: The Federal Rolein International Cooperation on Energy Innovation** *Aug2, 1999

****Office of Science andTechnology Policy**1600 Pennsylvania Ave, N.WWashington, DC 20502202.395.7347Information@ostp.eop.gov*To comment on this service,send feedback to the WebDevelopment Team.*  **
§ 995.6 Fees. ( a ) The Office of Coast Survey, NOAA, may charge a fee for costs incurred to process each request for certification pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 892b(b)(1)(C) and 892b(b)(2). The amount of the fee, if one is charged, will be determined by the Director, Office of Coast Survey, and charged to all Applicants based on the time and effort involved.
( b ) If a fee is charged, it will be charged for each application for certification submitted by an Applicant. A fee may also be charged for resubmissions of revised requests that were initially unacceptable and are sent in within 90 days as described in § 995.11(b)(2).
### **CHAPTER 153—REGIONAL COMMISSIONS**

Sec.
15301.
Establishment, membership, and employees.
15302.
Decisions.
15303.
Functions.
15304.
Administrative powers and expenses.
15305.
Meetings.
15306.
Personal financial interests.
15307.
Tribal participation.
15308.
Annual report.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–334, title VI, §6304(g), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4752, renumbered chapter 2 of subtitle V of this title as chapter 153 of this title.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 25 (Friday, February 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 5873]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2587]



[[Page 5873]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463 as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research (DMR) 
<greek-i>1203.
    Dates & Times: February 18, 2004; 7:30 a.m.-6 p.m. (open 10-12, 
1-4:45). February 19, 2004; 8 a.m.-5 p.m. (open 9:30-11).
    Place: University of California at Santa Barbara, CA.
    Type of Meeting: Part open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Thomas Riekier, Program Director, Materials 
Research Science and Engineering Centers, Division of Materials 
Research, Room 1065, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, telephone (703) 292-4914.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning progress of Materials Research Science and Engineering 
Center for future funding decisions.
    Agenda: February 18, 2004--Open to review and evaluate progress 
of Materials Research Science and Engineering Center.
    Reason for Closing: The work being reviewed may include 
information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: February 3, 2004.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-2587 Filed 2-5-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### Jacob A. Izenstatt et al., Appellants, v. I. Alfred Levy et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Michael Johnson, certify that:

1.    I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of @Road, Inc.;

2.    Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.    The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and
the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
March 15, 2005

/s/MICHAEL JOHNSON

Michael
Johnson
Chief Financial Officer

---



QuickLinks
### [§411c. Renumbered §481c]
#### § 919.410 May I approve a participant's use of the services of an excluded person?

After entering into a covered transaction with a participant, you as an agency official may not approve a participant's use of an excluded person as a principal under that transaction, unless you obtain an exception under § 919.120.
Order entered June 26, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 00758
- CV
JARI'L ROBINSON , ET AL. , Appellant s

V. PACE HOMES, Appellee On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court C ause No. DC
- 13
- 13967
- D



### O RDER
We GRANT appellant’s June 17, 2015 motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal. The notice of appeal filed on June 17, 2015 is deemed timely for jurisdictional purposes.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
### §5605. Contracts for transportation of mail by vessel

The Postal Service may contract for the transportation of mail by vessel without advertising for bids.

(Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 773; Pub. L. 109–435, title X, §1002(b)(3), Dec. 20, 2006, 120 Stat. 3255.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–438 struck out "for periods of not in excess of 4 years" before period at end.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1971, pursuant to Resolution No. 71–9 of the Board of Governors. See section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note preceding section 101 of this title.
NRC SCHEDULES MEETING JUNE 28 IN ATLANTA TO DISCUSS

PROPOSED INTERNATIONAL ISOTOPES FACILITY IN NEW MEXICO

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a public meeting for Thursday, 

June 28, to discuss the proposed International Isotopes facility in Lea County, N.M., that would

recover fluorine and make uranium from depleted uranium hexafluoride more suitable for 

disposal.

The meeting is scheduled for 10 a.m. EDT in Room 1486 of the NRC’s Region II Office 

at 245 Peachtree Center NE in Atlanta. The company will discuss the status of the project, and 

the NRC staff will provide an overview of the construction inspection program and how it would 

apply to the facility if it receives an NRC license. The meeting is open to the public and NRC 

staff will be available to answer questions or provide additional information after the business 

portion of the meeting. 

International Isotopes Fluorine Products Inc., a subsidiary of International Isotopes Inc., 

applied on Dec. 30, 2009, for a license to construct and operate the facility. The facility would

process depleted uranium hexafluoride from uranium enrichment facilities into fluorine products 

for commercial use and depleted uranium oxides for long-term stable disposal. The proposed 

plant would be located 14 miles west of Hobbs, N.M. 

###

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand.

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No: II-12-043

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416

 

 

June 14, 2012

 E-mail: OPA2.Resource@nrc.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2287 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2287

To amend title 37, United States Code, to remove the prohibition on the 
   ability of qualified dental officers in the uniformed services to 
 receive additional special pay while undergoing dental internship or 
                          residency training.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 2, 2003

    Mr. Simmons (for himself, Mr. Evans, Mr. Upton, Mr. Frost, Mr. 
 Hostettler, Mr. Turner of Texas, Mr. Souder, Mr. Kildee, Ms. Jackson-
  Lee of Texas, and Mr. Ney) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 37, United States Code, to remove the prohibition on the 
   ability of qualified dental officers in the uniformed services to 
 receive additional special pay while undergoing dental internship or 
                          residency training.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

     This Act may be cited as the ``Dental Officer Retention Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF LIMITATION ON RECEIPT OF SPECIAL PAY BY DENTAL 
              OFFICERS.

     Section 302b of title 37, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(4), by striking ``for any 12-month 
        period during which the officer is not undergoing dental 
        internship or residency training. Such additional special pay 
        shall be paid''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ``for any 12-month 
        period''.
                                 <all>
```
### §588. Movement and supply of office furniture

(a) Definition.—In this section, the term "controlled space" means a substantial and identifiable segment of space (such as a building, floor, or wing) in a location that the Administrator of General Services controls for purposes of assignment of space.

(b) Application.—This section applies if an agency (or unit of the agency), moves from one controlled space to another, whether in the same or a different location.

(c) Moving Existing Furniture.—The furniture and furnishings used by an agency (or organizational unit of the agency) shall be moved only if the Administrator determines, after consultation with the head of the agency and with due regard for the program activities of the agency, that it would not be more economical and efficient to make suitable replacements available in the new controlled space.

(d) Providing Replacement Furniture.—In the absence of a determination under subsection (c), suitable furniture and furnishings for the new controlled space shall be provided from stocks under the control of the moving agency or from stocks available to the Administrator, whichever the Administrator determines to be more economical and efficient. However, the same or similar items may not be provided from both sources.

(e) Control of Replacement Furniture.—If furniture and furnishings for a new controlled space are provided from stocks available to the Administrator, the items being provided remain in the control of the Administrator.

(f) Control of Furniture Not Moved.—

(1) In general.—If furniture and furnishings for a new controlled space are provided from stocks available to the Administrator, the furniture and furnishings that were previously used by the moving agency (or unit of the agency) pass to the control of the Administrator.

(2) Reimbursement.—

(A) In general.—Furniture and furnishings passing to the control of the Administrator under this section pass without reimbursement.

(B) Exception for trust fund.—If furniture and furnishings that were purchased from a trust fund pass to the control of the Administrator under this section, the Administrator shall reimburse the trust fund for the fair market value of the furniture and furnishings.

(3) Revolving or working capital fund.—If furniture and furnishings are carried as assets of a revolving or working capital fund at the time they pass to the control of the Administrator under this section, the net book value of the furniture and furnishings shall be written off and the capital of the fund is diminished by the amount of the write-off.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1115.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 588 | 40:490(g). | June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title II, §210(g), as added Sept. 1, 1954, ch. 1211, §3, 68 Stat. 1129. |

Section

In subsection (f)(2), the reimbursement requirement in 40:490(g) (last sentence) is set out as an exception to a general "without reimbursement" rule in 40:490(g) (3d sentence) to harmonize an inconsistency in the source law.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 20, 2009 

l0317 

Order 

 

March 20, 2009 

136926 

& (65) 

 

DANIEL HOWE, 

Plaintiff-Appellant 

and Cross-Appellee, 

v SC: 136926 

 COA: 273949 

Genesee CC: 2002-073710-NH 

MICHAEL BOUCREE and 

FLINT NEUROSCIENCE CENTER, 

 Defendants, 

and 

BHADRABALA B. GANATRA, M.D., 

individually and d/b/a BHADRABALA B. 

GANATRA, M.D., P.C., 

 Defendants-Appellees 

 and Cross-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 10, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as crossappellants are considered. Leave to appeal is DENIED in relation to the judgment of the 

Court of Appeals ordering a new trial because of misconduct by the plaintiff’s attorney. 

As stated by the panel, the resolution of this issue renders the other appellate issues moot. 

Accordingly, we VACATE the remainder of the Court of Appeals judgment. The 

application for leave to appeal as cross-appellants is DENIED. 

 KELLY, C.J., would grant leave to appeal.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. William Horowitz, Appellant, against Vernon A. Morhous, as Warden of Great Meadow Prison, Respondent.

*869Present — Foster, P. J., Heffeman, Brewster, Deyo and Bergan, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Bernard Hoppner, Appellant.

'No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ.
### §702. Return of foreign excess property to United States

(a) In General.—Under regulations prescribed pursuant to subsection (b), foreign excess property may be returned to the United States for handling as excess or surplus property under subchapter II of chapter 5 of this title or section 549 or 551 of this title when the head of the executive agency concerned, or the Administrator of General Services after consultation with the agency head, determines that return of the property to the United States for such handling is in the interest of the United States.

(b) Regulations.—The Administrator shall prescribe regulations to carry out this section. The regulations must require that transportation costs for returning foreign excess property to the United States are paid by the federal agency, state agency, or donee receiving the property.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1126.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 702 | 40:512(c). | June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title IV, §402(c), as added Pub. L. 91–426, §2(d), Sept. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 883; Pub. L. 94–519, §4, Oct. 17, 1976, 90 Stat. 2455. |

Section