alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**GAO-03-342**                      Published: Feb 14, 2003. Publicly Released: Mar 18, 2003.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Status of FY22 Projects 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

The events of September 11, 2001, have placed added emphasis on ensuring the security of the nation's food supply. GAO examined (1) whether FDA and USDA have sufficient authority under current statutes to require that food processors adopt security measures, (2) what security guidelines FDA and USDA have provided to industry, and (3) what security measures food processors have adopted.

## Recommendations

## Recommendations for Executive Action

## Full Report

Highlights

Full Report (53 pages)

Accessible Text 

## Office of Public Affairs

### Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

### Public Inquiries

Public Affairs
PublicAffairs@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

Homeland Security

Contaminated foodsFacility securityFood and drug legislationFood facilitiesFood industryFood inspectionFood supplyHomeland securitySafety regulationEpidemics
§ 1110.300 Appeal. ( a ) *General.* Any Person adversely affected or aggrieved by reason of NTIS denying or revoking such Person's certification under this part, or imposing upon such Person under this part a penalty, may obtain review by filing, within 30 days (or such longer period as the Director of NTIS may, for good cause shown in writing, fix in any case) after receiving notice of such denial, revocation or imposition, an administrative appeal to the Director of NTIS.
( b ) *Form of appeal.* An appeal shall be submitted in writing to Director, National Technical Information Service, at NTIS's current mailing address as found on its Web site: *www.ntis.gov .,* ATTENTION DMF APPEAL, and shall include the following: ( 1 ) The name, street address, email address and telephone number of the Person seeking review;
( 2 ) A copy of the notice of denial or revocation of certification, or the imposition of penalty, from which appeal is taken;
( 3 ) A statement of arguments, together with any supporting facts or information, concerning the basis upon which the denial or revocation of certification, or the imposition of penalty, should be reversed;
( 4 ) A request for hearing of oral argument before the Director, if desired.
( c ) *Power of attorney.* A Person may, but need not, retain an attorney to represent such Person in an appeal. A Person shall designate any such attorney by submitting to the Director of NTIS a written power of attorney.
( d ) *Hearing.* If requested in the appeal, a date will be set for hearing of oral argument before a representative of the Director of NTIS, by the Person or the Person's designated attorney, and a representative of NTIS familiar with the notice from which appeal has been taken. Unless it shall be otherwise ordered before the hearing begins, oral argument will be limited to thirty minutes for each side. A Person need not retain an attorney or request an oral hearing to secure full consideration of the facts and the Person's arguments.
( e ) *Decision.* After a hearing on the appeal, if a hearing was requested, the Director of NTIS shall issue a decision on the matter within 120 days, or, if no hearing was requested, within 90 days of receiving the appeal. The decision of the Director of NTIS shall be made after consideration of the arguments and statements of fact and information in the Person's appeal, and the hearing of oral argument if a hearing was requested, but the Director of NTIS at his or her discretion and with due respect for the rights and convenience of the Person and the agency, may call for further statements on specific questions of fact or may request additional evidence in the form of affidavits on specific facts in dispute. After the original decision is issued, an appellant shall have 30 days (or a date as may be set by the Director of NTIS before the original period expires) from the date of the decision to request a reconsideration of the matter. The Director's decision becomes final 30 days after being issued, if no request for reconsideration is filed, or on the date of final disposition of a decision on a petition for reconsideration.
#### Orson’s, Inc., Respondent, v. Geo. Rainess, Inc., Appellant.

*602No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and MacCrate, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION
-----------------------------------------
I, Michael D. Durham, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ADA-ES, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: May 9, 2006

/s/ Michael D. Durham
---------------------
Name: Michael D. Durham
Title: President and CEO
#### § 710.5 Authority.

The CWCR (parts 710 through 729 of this subchapter) implement certain provisions of the Chemical Weapons Convention under the authority of the Chemical Weapons Convention Implementation Act of 1998 (Act), the National Emergencies Act, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), as amended, and the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended, by extending verification and trade restriction requirements under Article VI and related parts of the Verification Annex of the Convention to U.S. persons. In Executive Order 13128 of June 25, 1999, the President delegated authority to the Department of Commerce to promulgate regulations to implement the Act, and consistent with the Act, to carry out appropriate functions not otherwise assigned in the Act but necessary to implement certain reporting, monitoring and inspection requirements of the Convention and the Act.
# Memorandum US. Departmentof**~c** • [ Yc :, 

### l f\ 

### q: 30 Transportation Officeofthe Secretary ofTransportatiOn Subject:

From:

To: Notice ofCommunication in Docket: DOT-OST-OST-2012-0029 Special Rules for Ronald Reag Airport (beyond-perimeter ex Secretary Ray LaHood 

# \ Chief, Dockets \ Date:

Reply to Attn. of: April 16, 2012



# \i In accordance with Departmentrules (14 CFR Part 300), I am reporting the following communication. On April16, 2012, during a telephone conversation with Governor Luis Fortufio from Puerto Rico, the Governor raised the subject of the Department's proceeding to allocate eight slot exemptions to new entrant and/or limited incumbent carriers for operations between Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA) and airports beyond the 1,250-mile DCA perimeter. The Governor expressed his supportfor the application filed byJetBlue Airways for nonstop service between DCA and SanJuan. I informed the Governor that, while I appreciated his interest in this case, I could not comment on its merits because the proceeding was under active consideration by the Department. Please place this memorandum in the appropriate Docket.

cc: Governor Luis Fortufio
NRC ISSUES DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ON

DEWEY-BURDOCK URANIUM RECOVERY PROJECT; SEEKS PUBLIC COMMENT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a draft supplemental environmental 

impact statement for the proposed Dewey-Burdock in-situ uranium recovery project in Custer 

and Fall River counties in South Dakota. Members of the public are encouraged to submit 

comments about the statement.

The statement includes the NRC staff’s preliminary recommendation to grant the license 

unless safety issues mandate otherwise.

Powertech (USA) Inc. submitted a license application for the facility on Aug. 10, 2009. 

The license would authorize Powertech to construct, operate and ultimately decommission the 

facility, which would use the in-situ leach process to recover uranium from underground ore and 

convert the recovered uranium into yellowcake for use in the production of nuclear fuel. 

The NRC draft report analyzes environmental impacts specific to the Dewey-Burdock 

site and mitigation strategies to reduce or avoid adverse effects on the surrounding environment. 

The staff continues to analyze safety aspects of the application in a separate technical review.

Public comments on the draft supplemental environmental impact statement will be 

accepted for 45 days following publication of a notice in the Federal Register, expected Nov. 23. 

Comments may be submitted over the federal government’s rulemaking website after that date 

using Docket ID NRC-2012-0277. They may also be mailed to Cindy Bladey, Chief, Rules, 

Announcements and Directives Branch, Office of Administration, Mail Stop TWB-05-B01M, 

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington D.C. 20555-0001. 

The draft supplemental environmental impact statement for the proposed DeweyBurdock uranium recovery project is available on the NRC website as Supplement 4 to NUREG1910, Generic Environmental Impact Statement for In-Situ Leach Uranium Milling Facilities.

More information on the application and the staff’s review is also available on the NRC website.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES link on the 

NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's 

website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 12-123 November 16, 2012
California Environmental Protection Agency AIR RESOURCES BOARD Executive Order S-16-001 WHEREAS,the rules identified in Enclosure A have been amended by the following air pollution control and air quality managementdistricts (districts): · Butte County Air Quality Management District Placer County Air Pollution Control District Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District Ventura CountyAir Pollution Control District WHEREAS, the districts are authorized by California Health and Safety Code (H&SC) section 40001 to adopt and enforce the rules identified in EnclosureA; WHEREAS, the rules have been submitted to the Air Resources Board (ARB) for inclusion in the California State Implementation Plan (SIP) as reasonably available control measuresfor limiting emissions ofair pollutants within the districts; WHEREAS, ARB has determined that these rules are necessaryto meet requirements ofthe federal Clean AirAct; and WHEREAS, ARB is authorized by H&SC sections 39601 , 39602, and 41650 through 41652 to adopt district rules as revisions to the SIP

. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that ARB hereby adopts the districts' rules identified in Enclosure A as revisions to the SIP. I certify, pursuantto 40 CFR 51.102(f), thatthe rules identified in Enclosure A were amended after notice and public hearings as required by 40 CFR 51.102(a) and 51

.102(d). Executed in Sacramento, California,this 11th day of

Richard W. Corey Executive Officer March , 2016.
§ 971.606 Onshore information. ( a ) To assist the Administrator in complying with NEPA requirements and to enable NOAA to function as lead agency in preparing permit site-specific environmental impact statements (EISs) and facilitating the preparation and processing of other environmental documents and permits, the applications must include the following information: ( 1 ) The location and affected environment of port, transport, processing and waste disposal facilities and associated facilities (e.g., maps, land use and layout);
( 2 ) A description of the environmental consequences and socio-economic effects of construction and operation of the facilities, including waste characteristics and toxicity;
( 3 ) Any mitigating measures that may be proposed;
( 4 ) Certification of consistency with the federally approved State coastal management program, where applicable, and evidence of the status of compliance with other State or local requirements relating to protection of the environment; and
( 5 ) Alternative sites and technologies considered by the applicant and the considerations which eliminate their selection.
( b ) The applicant must consult with NOAA as early as possible concerning the information to be submitted to NOAA to prepare an adequate environmental impact statement. The applicant is encouraged to consult with potentially affected States as early as is practicable [see also §§ 971.200(g) and 971.213].
( c ) The requirements of paragraphs (a)(1)-(3) and (5) of this section also apply if approval of processing outside the United States is requested by the applicant, in accordance with Executive Order 12114 which requires the environmental review of major Federal actions abroad. Information detailing the socio-economic impacts of foreign processing activities is not required.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i at e f orpubl i c at i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane lunani m ous l yc onc lude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T JO S E M A R IA M E JI A -M O R A , a. k. a. O scar G arci a-V arg as, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , Jr ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 12- 70107 A ge nc yN o. A 091- 996- 085 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r atio nA p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A ugus t14, 2013 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , G R A B E R , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J os e M ar i aM e

j i a - M or a , anat i ve and c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons pr o s e f or r e v ie w o f

th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r atio nA p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e rd e n y in g h is m o tio n to r e o p e n r e m o v a l p r o c e e d in g s . W e h av e ju r is d ic tio nu n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e 

# FI LED AU G 19 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 70107 2 r e v ie w f o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n th e B I A ’s d e n ia l o f am o tio nto r e o p e n , G arci a v. H older , 6 2 1 F .3 d9 0 6 , 9 1 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 0 ) , an dw e d e n yth e p e titio nf o rr e v ie w . M e jia - M o r af

ile datim e lym o tio nto r e o p e nw ith n e w , p r e v io u s ly un avai l abl e, evi dence of hardship t o h i s U ni t ed S t at es ci t i ze n d augh t ert o sup po rt h is ap p lic atio n f

o rc an c e llatio n o f

r e m o v a l. T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g M e

jia - M o r a ’s m o tio n to r e o p e no nth e g r o u n dth at th e n e w e v id e n c e o f h is d au g h te r ’s d ia g n o s is w ith B e ll’s p a ls yw a s in s u f f ic ie n t to e s tab lis h p r im af a c ie e lig ib ilityf

o rc an c e llatio n o f

r e m o v a l. Se e id. at 9 1 2 - 9 1 3 . P E T I T I O N F O R R E V I E W D E N I E D .
#### Erik H. Lorentzen, Appellant, v. Herman Stegemann, Respondent.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Stapleton, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Carr, J., dissented on the ground that the verdict is clearly inadequate.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 14, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), National Council for Prescription Drug Programs (“NCPDP”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: National Council for Prescription Drug Programs, Scottsdale, AZ. The nature and scope of NCPDP's standards development activities are: Creating and promoting standards for the transfer for data to and from the pharmacy services sector of the healthcare industry.

Dorothy B. Fountain, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-25863  Filed 11-19-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
##### 



Page 10 of 17 Exhibit 99(b) KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 1999-A OFFICERS CERTIFICATE JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., ELT
    
    Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, IT4 New York Plaza, 6th Floor
    
    60 Wall Street, 26th Floor-MS NYC60-2606New York, NY 10004
    
    New York, NY 10007Attn: ITS-Global Debt.
    
    Attn: Corporate Trust & Agency GroupPhone: (212) 623-5427
    
    Structured FinanceFax: (212) 623-5933
    
    Phone: (212) 250-8522Fax: (212) 797-8606KeyBank National Association800 Superior Ave, 4th FloorCleveland, OH 44114ATTN: President, KERPhone: (216) 828-4293Fax:  (216) 828-9301
 Pursuant to Section 4.09 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement among KeyBank National Association,
successor in interest to Key Bank USA, National Association, as Seller and Administrator, KeyCorp
Student Loan Trust 1999-A, as Issuer, Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency, as Servicer,
and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., successor in interest to Bank One, National Association, successor
in interest to The First National Bank of Chicago, not in its individual capacity but solely as
Eligible Lender Trustee, dated as of January 1, 1999 (the Agreement), the undersigned hereby
certifies that (i) a review of the activities of the Administrator from January 1, 2004, through
December 31, 2004, and of its performance under the Agreement has been made, and (ii) to the best
of our knowledge, based on our review, the Administrator has fulfilled all its obligations under
the Agreement and the related Administration Agreement respectively throughout such period. KeyBank National Association,
successor in interest to
Key Bank USA, National Association,
as Administratorby:/S/ DANIEL G. SMITHDate: February 18, 2005
    
    Name: Daniel G. Smith 
Title: Senior Vice Presidentby:/S/ DARLENE H. DIMITRIJEVSName: Darlene H. Dimitrijevs
Title: Senior Vice President