U.S. Fire Administration/Technical Report Series

Special Report: 

Firefighter Arson

USFA-TR-141/January 2003

Homeland

Security

U.S. Fire Administration Fire Investigations Program

T

he U.S. Fire Administration develops reports on selected major fires throughout the country. 

The fires usually involve multiple deaths or a large loss of property. But the primary criterion 

for deciding to do a report is whether it will result in significant “lessons learned.” In some 

cases these lessons bring to light new knowledge about fire--the effect of building construction or 

contents, human behavior in fire, etc. In other cases, the lessons are not new but are serious enough 

to highlight once again, with yet another fire tragedy report.

The reports are sent to fire magazines and are distributed at National and Regional fire meetings. The 

International Association of Fire Chiefs assists USFA in disseminating the findings throughout the 

fire service. On a continuing basis the reports are available on request from USFA; announcements 

of their availability are published widely in fire journals and newsletters.

This body of work provides detailed information on the nature of the fire problem for policymakers 

who must decide on allocations of resources between fire and other pressing problems, and within 

the fire service to improve codes and code enforcement, training, public fire education, building 

technology, and other related areas.

The Fire Administration, which has no regulatory authority, sends an experienced fire investigator 

into a community after a major incident only after having conferred with the local fire authorities 

to insure that USFA’s assistance and presence would be supportive and would in no way interfere 

with any review of the incident they are themselves conducting. The intent is not to arrive during 

the event or even immediately after, but rather after the dust settles, so that a complete and objective 

review of all the important aspects of the incident can be made. Local authorities review USFA’s 

report while it is in draft. The USFA investigator or team is available to local authorities should they 

wish to request technical assistance for their own investigation.

This report and its recommendations were developed by USFA staff and by TriData Corporation, 

Arlington, Virginia, its staff and consultants, who are under contract to assist the Fire Administration 

in carrying out the Fire Reports Program.

The U.S. Fire Administration greatly appreciates the cooperation received from the City of Bessemer 

Fire and Rescue Service. Particular thanks go to Bessemer Fire Marshal Bill Avery and also Alabama 

State Fire Marshal John S. Robinson.

For additional copies of this report write to the U.S. Fire Administration, National Fire Data Center, 

16825 South Seton Avenue, Emmitsburg, Maryland 21727.

Special Report: Firefighter Arson

Prepared by: Hollis Stambaugh

 Hilary Styron

This is Report 141 of the Major Fires Investigation Project conducted

by TriData Corporation under contract EMW-90-C-3338 to the United

States Fire Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

Homeland

Security

Department of Homeland Security

United States Fire Administration

National Fire Data Center

U.S. Fire Administration

Mission Statement

As an entity of the Department of Homeland 

Security, the mission of the USFA is to reduce life and economic losses due to fire 

and related emergencies, through leadership, advocacy, coordination, and support. 

We serve the Nation independently, in coordination with other Federal agencies, 

and in partnership with fire protection and 

emergency service communities. With a 

commitment to excellence, we provide public education, training, technology, and data 

initiatives.

Homeland

Security

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The U.S. Fire Administration greatly appreciates the cooperation received from the following people 

and organizations during the preparation of this report:

Richard Barlette Chief, Arson Bureau, State of New York Office of Fire Prevention and 

Control

James Bowie Legislative Liaison, Fireman’s Association of South Carolina

Ken Cabe South Carolina Forestry Commission

David H. Fischler Commissioner, Suffolk County Department of Fire and Rescue

Timothy G. Huff Consultant; Former Analyst for the National Center for the Analysis of 

Violent Crime, FBI Academy

Kevin Kelm ATF Agent (Treasury), National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime, 

FBI Academy

Edward A. Mann Pennsylvania State Fire Commissioner

Frank McGarry Project Manager, National Association of State Fire Marshals

Joseph Murabito Delaware State Fire School

Burt Polk State Fire Marshal, South Carolina

Willard Preston Delaware State Fire Marshal

Paul E. Reichenbach Public Education/Information Specialist, Office of the Pennsylvania 

State Fire Commissioner

Nicholas Saites Sergeant, Fire Marshal Unit, Bureau of Criminal Investigation 

Pennsylvania State Police

Dr. Allen D. Sapp Professor of Criminal Justice, Central Missouri State University

James Swafford Lieutenant, Hamilton County, Tennessee Sheriff’s Department, Property 

Crimes Division

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

DEFINING THE PROBLEM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

Firefighter Arson Statistics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

Profiling the Firefighter Arsonist. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

MOTIVES OF FIREFIGHTER ARSON . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

CASES OF ARSON IN THE FIRE SERVICE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

Arson Incidents Involving Volunteer Firefighters. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

Wildland/Forest Fire Service. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

IMPACT OF FIREFIGHTER ARSON . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

Public Trust. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

Fire Department Impact. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

Financial Consequences. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

PREVENTION OF FIREFIGHTER ARSON . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

Pennsylvania Firefighter Arson Task Force. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

Suffolk County, New York Arson Task Force. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

New York State, Office of Fire Prevention and Control—

Fire Service Organization and Fire Behavior: Firefighter Firesetters. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

South Carolina Forestry Commission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

Delaware State Fire Marshal’s Office and Delaware State Fire School. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

APPENDIX A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27

Affidavit For Fire Company Membership, The Office of the 

State Fire Marshal in Pennsylvania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

APPENDIX B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

“South Carolina Firefighters Employment and Registration Act’. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30

South Carolina State Fire Marshal’s Office Firefighter 

Registration Forms. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31

APPENDIX C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37

State of New York S2657-A LAVALLE Chapter 423 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38

Section 176.b.16 Town Law, State of New York. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43

Article 35 Division of Criminal Justice Services Section 837-o, Executive Law. . . . . . . . . . . . . 44

Article 150, Section 150.01 Arson in the fifth degree. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45

1

INTRODUCTION

Everyone in the fire service must be, and should be, prepared to admit that there is a 

[firefighter arson] problem and that precise, firm methods are needed to combat this situation. To ignore the problem or suggest that it does not exist will only increase the damage caused by the arson firefighters involved, as well as destroy the morale of the other 

firefighters in their departments. We must talk to our members about firefighter arson. 

We must investigate, charge, and convict those that are committing this crime.1

Slowly, the fire service is shedding light on a situation that occurs rarely but which is nevertheless serious: some firefighters intentionally start fires. A very small percentage of otherwise trustworthy firefighters cause the very flames they are dispatched to put out. The incidence of 

illegal firesetting among the nation’s fire and rescue personnel is not known precisely. Fire incident 

data does not generate many details about incendiary fires, and a suspect’s occupation is rarely, if 

ever, included in the database. Overall, relatively little research has been conducted on arson compared to other types of crimes. Even less information data is available about arsonists who are also 

public safety personnel.

Most fire departments will never experience having a member indicted for arson. But for those that 

do, the impact is almost always significant. This report delves into the problem of firefighter arson 

and explains what some communities and states are doing to prevent it. These jurisdictions have 

taken bold steps by publicly stating that the problem exists, and they have acted to solve it. Given 

the far-reaching effects that criminal firesetting by a firefighter can cause, awareness and action are 

clearly necessary.

The impact of firefighter arson can be severe. People die or are seriously injured, including fellow 

firefighters who respond to the call. Homes are destroyed. An arsonist from within the fire department can disgrace the whole department, and his actions diminish public trust. Several states that 

have experienced the crime of firefighter arson have developed new legislation that directly impacts 

the prosecution of firefighters accused of arson. Firefighter arson task forces have been organized to 

prevent the crime. Education, training, and appropriate criminal background and reference checks 

are key components of the programs. Some of these proactive efforts are highlighted in this report 

to give fire service leaders ideas for their own departments.

Research conducted in the early 1990s by the National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime 

(NCVAC) located at the FBI Academy in Quantico, Virginia, suggests that a “tell-tale” sign that a 

firefighter may be setting fires is a sudden increase in nuisance fires within a company’s “first due” 

area. The research also indicates that firefighter arson offenders tend to be relatively new to the 

department, typically less than three years as a member. The FBI study of 25 cases of firefighter arson 

in seven U.S. states and one Canadian province showed that the number one motive was excitement, 

especially among young firefighters who were eager to put their training to practical use, and to be 

seen as heroes to fellow firefighters and the community they served. In that study, 75 firefighters 

were found to be responsible for 182 fires.

1 “NVFC Study: Fire-setting Firefighters--the Arsonist in the Fire Department,” originally published in the Illinois Gong, 

appeared in Minnesota Fire Chief, March/April 1995 issue.
2

Firefighter arsonists often escalate their fires over time. The NCVAC report2 indicates that firefighter 

arsonists, as is typical of most arsonists, generally start with nuisance fires, such as dumpsters, trash 

piles, or vegetation. Eventually, the firefighter arsonist graduates to other targets that have more 

damage potential, such as, abandoned vehicles or unoccupied structures. Sometimes even occupied 

structures are threatened by the arsonist’s actions. The FBI notes that one firefighter set fires to storage sheds beneath the stairs of occupied apartments.

In reviewing cases of firefighter arson for this report, it was apparent that one of the primary motives 

for firefighters who commit arson is to be seen as a hero. They may be the first to call in a fire, the 

first on the scene, and one of the most eager, excited, and enthusiastic members of the response 

team. Their main reason for lighting the fire is so they can appear as a hero, either by being the first 

to spot the flames, or by rescuing people and saving property. Extreme cases of firefighter arson 

involve fires set in occupied structures. When a firefighter sets fire to an occupied structure, the 

potential for being a life-saving hero is even greater. In North Carolina, one firefighter would set fire 

to an occupied house, and then return to the scene and rescue the family. His need for excitement, 

being worshiped, and getting attention predominated over any concern about the terrible danger to 

which he exposed the occupants.

DEFINING THE PROBLEM

The legal definition of arson varies considerably from state to state as do the minimum sentencing 

guidelines for this crime. Absent a uniform legal definition, the NCVAC defined arson as the willful 

and malicious burning of property. According to the NCVAC, the criminal act of arson has to have three 

elements:

There has been a burning of property. This must be shown to the court to be actual destruction, at least in part, not just scorching or sooting (although some states include any physical 

or visible impairment of any surface).

The burning is proven to be incendiary.

The burning was started with malice, that is, with the specific intent of destroying property.

Regardless of the motives, once a firefighter intentionally starts a fire, a criminal act has been committed. Some of the firefighter arsonists may not be aware that arson (in most states) is a felony. 

Younger firefighters especially tend to be unfamiliar with how the criminal justice system works and 

what can happen to them if they set a fire. A 1994 article published by the Suffolk County Arson Task 

Force (SCATF)3 on firefighter arson, describes what the consequences will be for firefighters who 

commit the crime of arson:

The crime will have a financial impact upon the arrestee.

The loss of family and friends is possible.

Personal embarrassment within the community is possible if the press highlights the 

individual.

•

•

•

•

•

•

2 Fire Setting Fire Fighters: Arsonists In The Fire Department-Identification and Prevention; 1994.

3 SCATF is a division within the Suffolk County Department of Fire, Rescue and Emergency Services in Yaphank, New York.
USFA-TR-141/January 2003 3

The loss of a job and the inability to obtain future jobs is probable.

The crime will bring embarrassment to the fire department and bring the potential for 

departmental financial losses.

The arrestee will lose certain civil rights if convicted of a felony.

The individual will not be permitted to join another fire department in the state [and probably anywhere else if the crime is known].

Firefighter Arson Statistics

The National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC), the National Fire Incident Reporting System (NFIRS), 

and the UCR report crimes of arson. None of the three, however, track the sub group of incendiary 

fires set by firefighters. Such a database would be challenging to develop because it could only be 

populated after criminal proceedings occurred and a verdict of guilty or a confession was obtained. 

It takes months, sometimes years, for arson cases to be cleared. Without comprehensive information 

and accurate statistics on a statewide or National basis, cases that occur tend to be viewed as anomalies, and perceived as isolated incidents. While some states may be able to produce information on 

the number of firefighter arson prosecutions, other fire agencies do not even acknowledge that the 

problem exists.

Recent reports in the news give a sense that the numbers nationwide are increasing. It is hard to 

know whether cases of arson involving firefighters are just being given more attention by the media, 

or whether there really are more cases occurring. Regardless, it is important to view the issue within 

the context of the whole fire service. With over one million volunteer and paid firefighters, the 

number of those who cause fires represents only a fraction of the number who otherwise serve 

honorably.

In 1993, the South Carolina Forestry Commission (SCEC) began looking into firefighter arson. They 

found that at least 33 fire department volunteers had been charged with arson in their state alone. 

In 1994, the Forestry Commission reported that the numbers had climbed upwards to 47. In 1996, 

a statewide teleconference was held by the SCFC to provide a comprehensive look at firefighter 

arson. Following the teleconference, the South Carolina Arson Investigators Association began offering awareness training to any department that requested it. Authorities wanted to make the message 

clear: firefighter arson would not be tolerated in South Carolina. The programs have been hailed as 

an outstanding success, with the number of firefighter arrests reduced from 47 in 1994, to 30 in 

1995, and to three in 1996.

In September 1993, the National Volunteer Fire Council (NVFC) established a Subcommittee on 

Firefighter Arson due to an increasing number of firefighter arson cases. The subcommittee was 

charged with investigating issues relating to firefighter arson, compiling the existing information, conducting research on the issue, and making any recommendations needed to overcome the 

problem.

While there was no doubt that firefighter arson occurs, the subcommittee was challenged by the 

lack of hard data available concerning arson caused by firefighters. In 1994 a National survey was 

conducted in an attempt to obtain better statistics. The subcommittee contacted fire chiefs, firefighters and fire marshals in every state with a survey that was to gauge the size of the problem, its effect 

on the fire service in that area, and the measures that had been taken to guard against firefighter 

•

•

•

•
4

arsonists. In the article, NVFC Study: The Fire-setting Firefighters--The Arsonists in the Fire Departments, published 

in the April 1995 issue of Minnesota Fire Chief, it was reported that 85 percent of the surveys were 

returned. The findings included:

Accurate numbers on both arson cases and the number of cases that involve firefighters are 

not available in most states. Many states have no numbers on how many arson cases involve 

fire service personnel. No respondents indicated knowledge of previous or ongoing investigations into the scope of the problem.

Many states do little or nothing in terms of training or awareness within the fire service on 

firefighter arson. A few states actively promote an awareness of the issue by incorporating the 

topic into state training courses. They use videos and other tools during department training 

or utilize the state fire marshal's office for short courses.

There was a consensus among most respondents that education and screening of applicants 

are an important part of the solution.

Only one state is currently pursuing legislation that would require a criminal background 

check of all applicants for fire department membership. While other states are not currently 

pursuing legislation, most see background checks as a practical means of deterring and 

identifying firefighter arsonists. Most respondents believed that education concerning the 

costs, dangers and legal aspects of arson, either incorporated into state training courses or 

given to new department members, can make a significant difference in deterring would-be 

arsonists.

Since the publication of this article, some progress has been made in passing legislation requiring 

background checks and firefighter registration. South Carolina and New York have passed firefighter 

registration laws. There has also been an increase in task forces established to address the problems 

of firefighter arson.

•

•

•

•
USFA-TR-141/January 2003 5

Profiling the Firefighter Arsonist

In the mid-90's, the South Carolina Forestry Commission developed a profile of the firefighter arsonist. At the same time, the FBI's Behavior Analysis Unit was also preparing a profile of firefighters who 

commit arson. The results of the two profiles are similar. While the profiles are still being tested 

for reliability, law enforcement officers in South Carolina and the FBI agree that they are remarkably 

accurate for the majority of the known cases. Table I provides a side-by-side comparison.

Table 1. Firefighter Arsonist Profile Comparison

South Carolina Forestry Commission FBI’s Behavior Analysis Unit

White male, age 17-26 White male, age 17-25

Product of disruptive, harsh, or unstable rearing 

environment

One or both parents missing from home during childhood. If from an 

intact home, the emotional atmosphere was mixed and unstable.

Poor relationship with father, overprotective mother Dysfunctional. One of their parents left the home before the child 

reached age 17. Cold, distant, hostile or aggressive relationship with 

natural father.

If married, poor marital adjustment Poor marital adjustment. If not married, still living at home with 

parents.

Lacking in social and interpersonal skills Lack of stable interpersonal relationships 

Poor occupational adjustment, employed in low-paying jobsPoor occupational adjustment. Menial laborer, skilled laborer, clerical jobs

Fascinated with the fire service and its trappings Interested in fire service in the context that it provides an arena for 

excitement, not for the sake of public service.

May be facing unusual stress (family, financial, or 

legal problems)

Alcoholism, childhood hyperactivity, homosexuality, depression, 

borderline personality disorder, and suicidal tendencies

Average to above-average intelligence but poor to 

fair academic performance in school

Mixed findings on intelligence, but most arsonists have been found 

to have average to higher intelligence. Poor academic performance.

Researchers note that firefighter arsonists, with some exceptions, use fairly unsophisticated methods 

in setting fires. Media reports and research show that arsonists tend to use available materials (paper 

or clothes), with gasoline as the most common accelerant. They ignite the fires with matches or 

cigarette lighters.
6

MOTIVES OF FIREFIGHTER ARSON

Motive is defined as the inner drive or impulse that is the cause, reason, or incentive that induces or 

prompts a specific behavior.4 Researchers in the area of arson conclude that there are six primary 

motives behind firesetting:

Excitement

Vandalism

Revenge

Profit

Extremist/Terrorist

Crime Concealment

What motivates a firefighter to set fires is a subject of great debate. Motives vary and can be abstract. 

Professionals in criminal investigation, psychiatric disease, and fire investigation have developed classifications for the motives behind firesetting in the general population. While fire service members 

who commit arson are represented among those classifications, there are some motives that are 

particular to firefighters. For example, the primary motives for firefighter arson seem to be the need 

to be seen as a hero, to practice extinguishing fires, or to earn extra money.

Some researchers believe that firefighter arsonists, like civilian arsonists, undergo a mental process 

referred to as RPM: the arsonist rationalizes the crime, projects blame, and minimizes the consequences. The FBI may conduct further research of RPM related to firefighter arson.5

The sections below elaborate on the six recognized motives of arson in general and how they apply 

to firefighters. Unfortunately, there are examples of firefighter arson in each category. 

Excitement-motivated Arson 

Offenders motivated by excitement include seekers of thrills, attention, recognition, and rarely, but 

importantly, sexual gratification. Excitement and action accompany a fire. The ability to create a 

situation requiring the response of the fire service and law enforcement provide some people with 

a feeling of empowerment over society. Potential targets of the excitement-motivated arsonist run 

full spectrum from so-called nuisance fires to occupied apartment houses at nighttime. Firefighters 

are known to set fires so they can engage in the suppression effort. Firefighter arsonists who seek 

recognition, or wish to be viewed as heroes, may set and “discover” the fires.

Vandalism-motivated Arson

Vandalism-motivated arson is defined as malicious or mischievous firesetting that results in damage 

to property. Vandalism fires are most often set by two or more individuals (usually juveniles) for 

no apparent reason other that “just for kicks.” One of the most common targets is schools or school 

property and educational facilities. Vandals also frequently target abandoned structures and flammable vegetation. This is one motive that may be found more frequently among civilian firesetters 

than among firefighters who set fires.

•

•

•

•

•

•

4A Motive Based Offender Analysis of a Serial Arsonist. NCVAC, FBI Academy, Quantico, VA.

5

 The theory of RPM applies to other crimes as well. For further information on the concept of RPM, contact the National 

Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime, FBI Academy, Quantico, Virginia.
USFA-TR-141/January 2003 7

Revenge-motivated Arson

Revenge motivated fires are set in retaliation for some injustice, real or imagined, perceived by the 

offender. The event or circumstance that is perceived as a wrong may have occurred months or 

years before the fire-setting activity. Revenge-motivated arson can further be subdivided into four 

major groups: personal revenge, societal retaliation, institutional retaliation, and group retaliation. 

Disgruntled employees of the fire service may set fires in retaliation for a perceived grievance. In 

one case a volunteer torched the fire station, and in another, a fire chief torched his fire station. In 

one case, the FBI found that a group of demoralized firefighters set fires in retaliation for a grievance 

against their fire chief.

Crime Concealment-motivated Arson

Arson is the secondary criminal activity of this motivational category. The fire is set for the purpose 

of covering up a murder or burglary or to eliminate evidence left at a crime scene. Other examples 

include fires set to destroy business records to conceal cases of embezzlement and the many cases of 

auto theft arson where fire is set to destroy evidence. In March of 2000 in Memphis, Tennessee, a 

career firefighter was charged with attempted arson, after lighting his house on fire at an attempt to 

conceal the murder of his wife.

Profit-motivated Arson

Arsonists in this category expect profit from their firesetting, either directly for monetary gain, or 

indirectly to eliminate debt. The key to this fire is the desire to cause the most possible damage in the 

least possible time. Examples include insurance fraud, liquidating property, dissolving businesses, 

destroying inventory, land clearance, or to gain employment. The latter is exemplified by the allegations brought against a part-time forest service firefighter in Arizona during the summer of 2002, 

who wanted the extra work.

Extremist/Terrorist-motivated Arson

Arsonists may set fires to further social, political, or religious causes. Examples of extremist/terrorist-motivated targets include abortion clinics, slaughterhouses, animal laboratories, and furriers 

or fur outlets. The targets of political terrorists reflect the focus of the terrorists’ wrath. Although 

the arsonist wishes his individual identity to remain unknown, it is usually important that their 

group or “cause” be identified as the responsible party. In the late 1990s and into 2000, there were 

documented incidents of extremist arson in the south. In Alabama, churches of predominantly 

African-American membership were burned to the ground. Some of these fires were later attributed 

to white firefighters.

Mixed Motives

Media accounts and interviews with arson investigators indicate that the motives for firefighters to 

commit arson are usually mixed; that is, there is more than one motive as borne out by the above 

examples. In interviews with firefighter arsonists, they indicated that while there was a primary 

motive, there were secondary motives as well. Reports from the FBI suggest that the arsonist may be 

disenfranchised from his fire department, and alienated by our society such that the aspect of power 

should be considered as part of the motive. Revenge arsonists, whether civilian or firefighter, may 

target society, but another motive is to achieve a sense of power.
8

An FBI agent who studied arson asserts that revenge is present in all arsons to a “greater or lesser 

degree.” The FBI report, A Motive-Based Offender Analysis of Serial Arsonists, had this to say about mixed 

motives involving revenge and power:

Motives for arson, like other aspects of human behaviors, often defy structured, unbending definition. Strictly speaking, who can argue that vandals are not looking for excitement when they are engaging in their malicious mischief? Add an element of power and 

revenge and one can see the problem of strict, unyielding classification. ...Be aware that 

motivations may change.... 

While investigators theorize that firefighters mostly set fires to be seen as heroes and that the motive 

is peripherally laced with the need for power, the firefighter may underestimate the power and consequences of the fire.6

 Firefighters with a desperate need to obtain recognition commit risky acts that 

reflect bad judgment. They fail to consider the potential consequences of the crime, or they think 

they will not get caught.

While arson often is not directly associated with economic recession, arson caused by firefighters 

certainly can have economic ties. Increased overtime pay, attempts at covering gambling debts, and 

fighting fires for a paid-on-call fire service have all been incentives for firefighters to set fires. In the 

summer of 2002, a wildland firefighter was charged with setting one of the largest wildfires in history. As an unemployed temporary firefighter for the Bureau of Indian Affairs, the Arizona resident 

would have earned a reported $8.00 per hour for fighting fires.

There were notable differences between the FBI and Forestry Commission research on the subject of 

whether firefighter arsonists act alone or in groups. The FBI research showed that most firefighter 

arsonists work alone, but many South Carolina cases involved several firefighters from a single department. The latter behavior is similar to group behavior in adolescents, suggesting that insecurity and 

lack of maturity are significant in the psychology of firefighter arsonists.7

The FBI study found that the arson cases involving more than one firefighter frequently were associated with department programs designed for younger participants, such as those for apprentice 

firefighters, youth groups, or auxiliary firefighter programs for teenagers.8 Novice (or junior) firefighters are disproportionately represented in the fraction of a percentage of fire department members who set fires.

CASES OF ARSON IN THE FIRE SERVICE

Of the approximately 30,0009 fire departments in the United States, the overwhelming majority 

(possibly as high as 75 percent or higher) are volunteer departments. The crime of firefighter arson 

has occurred in career departments, volunteer departments, and the wildland fire service. Most of 

6

While it is generally believed by society that firefighters, of all people, should understand the power of fire; new 

members to the fire service, junior volunteers, or fire departments that do not have many working fires, may not be 

experienced in the power of fire and its consequences.

7Cabe, Ken. Firefighter Arson: Local Alarm, Fire Management Notes. Volume 56, Number 1, 1996. Page 8.

8Huff, Timothy, Violent Crime Case Analyst, Behavior Analysis Unit at the National Center for the Analysis of Violent 

Crime within the FBI Academy, authored, Focus On: Arson, published in the August 15, 1994 issue of IAFC On Scene.

9 Estimate courtesy of the U.S. Fire Administration.
USFA-TR-141/January 2003 9

the documented cases have occurred in volunteer departments, which is not surprising since volunteers far outnumber career members. That fact notwithstanding, perhaps the most well-known case 

involved a career firefighter. John Orr, former chief arson investigator with the Glendale, California 

Fire Department, was a prolific firesetter. In 1991 a federal grand jury indicted Orr on charges that 

he set or tried to set blazes in eight stores during a three-year period. There were countless other 

fires where he was a suspect, but the evidence was not sufficient to charge him. Orr was indicted on 

five counts of arson and three counts of attempted arson, and was later convicted by a Superior Court 

jury of setting fire to a home center store. Four people, including a two-year old boy were killed in 

that blaze. A book and made-for-TV movie publicized the case.

Officials believe that Orr might never have been caught were it not for the investigation of a fire 

that occurred at a craft store. The investigators of that fire were able to recover a fingerprint from a 

partially burned incendiary device, and after a search of almost 1.2 million fingerprints, a match was 

made to John Orr.

Glendale officials and Federal authorities conducted an investigation of Orr that included surveillance. They alerted his supervisors that he was an arson suspect. Prior to the investigation, John 

Orr had written a novel about a firefighter turned arsonist. In October of 1991, Mr. Orr asked his 

secretary to type a letter to publishers, pitching his novel about an actual serial arsonist, stating, “He 

has not been identified or apprehended, and probably will not be in the future. As in the real case, 

the arsonist in my novel is a firefighter.”

The Los Angeles Times reported that the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s office accepted a life 

prison term for Orr. The jury had been deadlocked eight to four on whether to recommend that the 

17-year veteran firefighter and arson investigator be executed.

Case Study #1

Memphis, Tennessee

March 2000: Memphis Fire Department, career firefighter Fredrick Williams, 41 confessed 

to killing his new bride, setting fire to their home and fatally shooting two colleagues and a 

sheriff’s deputy. Williams was charged with murder, attempted murder and arson. The incident started when Williams’ wife of three weeks arrived home. He shot and killed her in the 

kitchen with a 12-gauge shotgun. Williams then set fire to a back bedroom. 

A Sheriffs Deputy responding to the call was shot in the head when Williams allegedly came 

out of the house and fired a shot through the Deputy’s windshield. A passerby was shot in 

the face and suffered non-life threatening injuries. 

A fire truck arrived on the scene. They could not see the Deputy’s wrecked squad car and 

could not see that he had been shot. Williams allegedly ambushed the firefighters as they 

arrived to fight a blaze at his home. Williams, a six-year veteran of the fire department was 

shot in the groin by police officers when he refused to put down his weapon. 
10 U.S. Fire Administration/Technical Report Series

Arson Incidents Involving Volunteer Firefighters

The State of Tennessee Department of Commerce and Insurance, Division of Fire Prevention, Bomb 

and Arson Section provided to this study information related to firefighter arson, including a 

memo they published in October 2001. A portion of the memo discussed the results of an internal 

investigation:

In the past three years, the Bomb and Arson Section has investigated the following 

cases where volunteer firemen were identified as suspects and/or defendants in an 

investigation:

A total of 11 volunteer firefighters were identified as suspects in these cases. Nearly 

$1,700,000 in fire losses resulted because of the action of these defendants. Targets 

included a fire department, a car dealership, residential dwellings, barns, a mobile home, 

and a house of worship. There were no deaths or injuries associated with these incidents. 

Motives have ranged from the “hero” syndrome to sexual gratification.

In addition to the cases worked by this Section, we also offered assistance in the latter 

part of 1998 to (name deleted for anonymity) the head of the Hamilton County Sheriff’s 

Department Arson Unit. A former volunteer firefighter was attempting to secure his 

position back as a volunteer firefighter and encountered resistance from the chief. He 

and six other volunteers entered into a conspiracy to burn a vacant house, thereby providing this former firefighter an opportunity to call it in and regain the confidence of 

the chief. Unfortunately, when he was in the process of starting the fire, he was trapped 

inside the house and died. A total of six (6) volunteer firefighters were subsequently 

convicted for this crime.

One of our most significant cases involved a volunteer fire chief who allegedly set 

fire to a local fire department, causing $750,000 in damages. After more than a oneyear investigation, he was indicted by a Federal grand jury in the Western District of 

Tennessee. Subsequently, a Federal Judge dismissed the indictment on the grounds that 

the interstate nexus requirement of 18 U.S.C.844(i) was not met. The United States 

Attorney has appealed this decision. Another one of our cases involved a State employee 

who was a guard at Fort Pillow State Prison and worked as a volunteer firefighter at both 

the Henning and Fort Pillow Fire Departments. He entered guilty pleas to arson of his 

mobile home and a grass fire.

We must emphasize that the bulk of men and women in the volunteer fire service provide 

a valuable contribution to their respective communities. However, inasmuch as screenings and background investigations are rarely conducted, a relatively small segment of 

individuals with less than pure motives are sometimes members of these units. Our task 

is to ensure that, when such incidents do occur, we develop sufficient evidence to sustain 

their conviction in court.

Upon release from prison, the State employee of the Fort Pillow State Prison (mentioned above) was 

arrested again for burning a car dealership in Brownsville, TN, causing approximately $750,000 in 

damage. His motive for starting the fires was sexual gratification. He was subsequently convicted 

for and sentenced to a three year prison term in conjunction with the arson charges and charges of 

following the fire apparatus.
USFA-TR-141/January 2003 11

Case Study #2

Hamilton County, Tennessee

Of the cases mentioned in the State of Tennessee’s memorandum, the Hamilton County 

incident, had a far-reaching, long-term impact on the firefighters, the community, and the 

department.

The five surviving firefighters plead guilty to arson and aggravated burglary. Most of the 

defendants were sentenced to ten-year prison terms. A sixth man pleaded guilty to being an 

accessory after the fact and was sentenced to one year, suspended, and probation. One of 

the men was sentenced to eight one-year consecutive terms on the arson and burglary pleas. 

He was also sentenced to one-year consecutive terms on guilty pleas to unrelated charges of 

solicitation of a minor and altering the vehicle identification number on an automobile.

The volunteer firefighters were current or former members of a volunteer fire department 

near Chattanooga. As a result of the charges, investigation, and subsequent sentencing of the 

men, the department met with much public scrutiny and community mistrust.

In July of 1999, residents called for an immediate investigation into the fire department, 

focusing on the way it managed its money and staff, as well as its ability and readiness to 

respond to fires, “...not just the ones they set themselves.” Residents were outraged with the 

knowledge that the firefighters received hundreds of hours of training and still considered 

themselves “so bored they had to set fire to a house.”

The fire chief of the department believed that the incident was an isolated one. However, a 

review of the Tennessee Incident Fire Reporting System showed that the department responded 

to five suspicious fires in vacant buildings or lots in their jurisdiction from 1997 to 1999. All 

were located within one mile of the fire station. In media reports, a county arson investigator confirmed that the suspicious fires at the five locations were under investigation, and may 

eventually be linked to the former firefighters.

Ultimately a review panel was named to review the practices and standards of the department. The review panel submitted 23 recommendations, which included requesting criminal 

background checks on current and future members and establishing progressive disciplinary 

procedures.

After the results of the review panel were made public, there was still much finger pointing, 

anger, and animosity towards the fire department. Several residents felt as if nothing had 

been accomplished. With the panel consisting of only emergency personnel except for one 

public citizen, “take care of their own” allegations surfaced. The incident demonstrates that 

the crime of firefighter-related arson can impact the entire community. The impact is still felt 

by some members of the community today.
12 U.S. Fire Administration/Technical Report Series

Case Study #3

Dearborn, Missouri

On June 2, 2001, Travis Brown, 30, a volunteer firefighter with the Dearborn Area Fire 

Protection District was killed when the tanker truck he was riding in while en route to a barn 

fire, rolled over. Brown was ejected from the truck and pronounced dead on the scene. The 

driver of the truck was seriously injured in the wreck and was transported by helicopter to a 

near-by trauma center.

The firefighters were responding on a mutual aid call from another fire department when 

the wreck occurred. During the investigation, a volunteer firefighter from the first responding department confessed to having started the barn fire and several other fires in the Platte 

County area over the course of several weeks. In his statement to police, Jason Hendrix confessed that he started the fire by lighting a stack of paper feed bags with a wooden match; he 

then closed the barn door and fled the scene.

The Platte County Sheriffs Department charged Hendrix, 26, with second-degree arson, a 

class C felony. At the time, bond for Hendrix was set at $20,000. During the arraignment of 

his case, Mr. Hendrix pleaded innocent to the arson charge and requested a 10 percent cash 

bond payment on the original bond amount. The Assistant Prosecutor objected, arguing that 

Hendrix posed a danger to society. The Platte County Circuit Judge put special conditions on 

the bond request and said that Hendrix was not allowed to have any fire-making materials or 

flammable materials in his possession. If he was to be found with fire-making materials, he 

would be taken into custody and have the bond amount increased to $200,000.

On June 12, 2001 the charges against Mr. Hendrix were upgraded to include one count of 

second-degree murder. In the state of Missouri, if in committing a felony a death occurs, the 

offender may also be charged with murder. The firefighters of Brown’s department encouraged the Prosecutor to file felony murder charges.

During a preliminary hearing regarding the case, a judge found probable cause and ruled that 

the case be heard before a jury on one count of second-degree murder, three felony charges-

-including second-degree arson--and first-degree property damage. The bond amount was 

set at $270,000. Mr. Hendrix also faced charges of five misdemeanor counts of negligently 

setting fire to a woodland, cropland, or grassland. He could be sentenced up to seven years 

for the arson charge, 10 to 30 years or life on the second-degree murder charge and up to 

five years for the property damage charge.

His wife and five children survive Travis Brown. He was also a registered nurse at a nearby 

health organization. The community supported the families of the wreck by establishing a 

memorial fund.
USFA-TR-141/January 2003 13

Case Study #4

Lake Charles, Louisiana

May 2002: Darrel James Lyon, 19, a junior volunteer firefighter pleaded no contest to setting 

three fires while on probation with an area fire department. The fires were set at an American 

Legion post, a field behind a dance school, and a vacant building.

Lyon pleaded no contest in March to three felony counts of arson, rather than face a trial on 

those charges and three which were dismissed; two of forgery and one of unauthorized use 

of an access card.

Lyon’s parents were firefighters and he wanted to be a firefighter in Chicago. He participated 

in the local fire department’s junior volunteer program and helped clean trucks, pack hoses, 

and fight some fires under other firefighters’ supervision.

Case Study #5

Caddo Parish, Louisiana

August 1999: Following a joint investigation by the Caddo Parish Sheriff’s Office and the 

Louisiana Fire Marshal’s Office, a volunteer firefighter was arrested and charged with one 

count of simple arson.

Donald Edward Kerry, 25 was arrested and charged with setting an abandoned house on fire 

in April 1999. Kerry was a suspect in four other suspicious fires in the same part of the parish 

in the same time period. Additional charges were pending at the time of this report.

Case Study #6

St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana

June 26, 2002: Kenneth James Delaune, 26, and Dustin Shane Talley, 19, were booked on 

charges of intentionally setting forest fires, raising the number of arrests to nine in the largest 

arson investigation the state of Louisiana has seen.

The arrests are part of a year-long investigation into more than a dozen suspicious fires near 

Pearl River. Seven other firefighters from St. Tammany Paris Fire Protection District Nos. 7 

and 11 were arrested in October 2001. Investigators reported that the firefighters torched 

eight abandoned homes and set several forest fires out of boredom. After setting the fires the 

firefighters would return to the stations and wait to be called out on the blazes.

The seven firefighters who pleaded guilty in March of 2002 each received a two-year suspended sentence and two years of probation and were ordered to pay restitution and complete 200 hundred hours of community service. 
14 U.S. Fire Administration/Technical Report Series

Wildland/Forest Fire Service

In the past decade there has been an average of 116,000 wildfires per year in our nation’s forests. 

According to Federal statistics, 102,000 of them were person-caused, both accidentally and intentionally. A miniscule number of arson fires in our National forests are set by federally-employed 

firefighters; nevertheless, a retired Forest Service fire administrator estimates that 10 to 20 wildfires 

per year are deliberately started by firefighters. A director of the Western Fire Ecology Center in 

Eugene, Oregon, noted that, “we only hear of the very worst and blatant incidents, where people are 

caught red-handed or confess.”

As noted earlier, arson offenders in the Forest Service and other federal wildland agencies often have 

a financial incentive. Permanent firefighting positions under the National Fire Plan have hourly 

wages starting at $9.40 to $14.43 per hour. Temporary positions range from $7.67 per hour to 

$10.52 per hour starting salary. Regionally there are variables in target grade level, tour of duty, 

bargaining unit status, and location.

During the fire season, the need for firefighters increases dramatically. Temporary and contract 

employees are brought in to augment the resources required to fight wildland fires during the peak 

season. The number of positions to be filled depends on an individual unit’s needs.

In 2000, a former Forest Service fire safety worker was sentenced to three years in prison for setting 

fires in the Oregon woods. Investigations showed that she wanted to earn overtime pay fighting the 

fires.10 A Forest Service firefighter was sentenced to prison in 2001 for fires he set in the Cleveland 

National Forest. 

In the summer of 2002, two Forest Service employees were accused of allegedly setting two of the 

largest wildfires in this country’s history. The Rodeo fire in Arizona that allegedly was started by a 

part-time Forest Service firefighter, merged with another blaze and raced across more than 465,000 

acres. It destroyed at least 423 homes and devastated the economy of the communities nearby, 

including an Indian reservation. The fire was difficult to contain, and is estimated to have cost the 

state of Arizona and the Forest Service over $10 million to control.

The part-time firefighter was a resident of the already economically depressed Fort Apache Indian 

Reservation that had portions of land and timber destroyed in the fire. Prosecutors allege that the fire 

was set in dry grass and with the hope that the firefighter would be called to fight the fire and earn 

$8.00 an hour as part of the fire crew.

In Colorado, also in the summer of 2002, a Forest Service employee was accused of starting the 

Hayman fire in the Pike National Forest. It was a 137,000-acre fire—the largest in that state’s history--and the fire destroyed more than 130 homes, caused the evacuation of 25,000 residents, and 

threatened the outlying suburbs of Denver. Smoke and ash from the fire could be seen for hundreds 

of miles, and fans at the Colorado Rockies baseball games were subject to falling ash from the sky. 

The smoke from the Hayman fire was considered a health hazard by public health officials, and cost 

the state of Colorado and the Forest Service an estimated $15 million. While the accused employee 

maintains the fire was accidental, prosecutors suggest that the fire was set for revenge, attention, and 

to gain financially.

10As a side note, female arsonists are unusual, and female firefighter arsonists are rare.
USFA-TR-141/January 2003 15

Case Study #7

U.S. Forest Service Firefighter

In July of 2001, James King, 26, a seasonal firefighter for the US Forest Service was accused 

of setting fire fires in a two-month period in the Cleveland National Forest. According to 

an affidavit filed with the US Attorney, a fellow firefighter who responded to a fire in May of 

that year, said that King “appeared to have been watching in the area for something to appear 

when no one else could see anything.”

No one was injured in any of the fires, which consumed about 30 acres in San Diego County. 

A special agent with the US Forest Service believed that if King had not been stopped, he 

would have continued to set fires. Investigators were concerned that as the fire season went 

on, King might have set a fire that would have escaped control and become a large fire, possibly injuring lives and damaging property.

According to the affidavit filed in US District Court, King was seen to have a “huge smile on 

his face” as he responded to a fire in July 2001, near the Pine Hills station. The affidavit also 

described King as eagerly dispatching fire trucks to small blazes that broke out near the station 

when he was the only firefighter on duty.

According to news media accounts, King had been under surveillance for five weeks. Fellow 

firefighters grew suspicious of King in May when he alerted them to a fire near the station. 

King insisted that there was a fire, though no one else at the station could see or smell smoke. 

He then guided the fire crew to the location of the fire on the Inaja Indian Reservation.

King later confirmed the investigators’ suspicions. While staring at a brush pile across the 

road from the ranger station, according to the affidavit, King asked another firefighter, “What 

would I do if a fire started in front of the station? Would I be able to take the fire engine over 

and put out the fire?” Nine days later, a brush fire occurred across the station, and it was 

determined to be intentionally set.

In October of 2001, James King pleaded guilty for setting two blazes in the Cleveland National 

Forest, in exchange for dismissal of three other arson charges against him. He was free on 

$50,000 bail and satellite surveillance. An Assistant U.S. Attorney for the case told reporters 

that King may face prison time and restitution for firefighting costs, estimated at $101,000. 

Under the law, each of the two remaining arson charges carries a maximum penalty of five 

years in prison and a $250,000 fine.

The Assistant US Attorney was willing to accept the pleas for the two largest fires that occurred 

on June 14 and July 14, 2001 in exchange for the dismissal of charges on three small blazes 

that burned less than three acres. The two larger fires burned over 50 acres and took air tankers to extinguish. King admitted that he set one of the two fires because he wanted “a little 

extra pay.” He allegedly set the other one to see how fast a fire would spread, then fled when 

it quickly burned, reports say.

On March 29, 2002, King was sentenced to 30 months in federal prison for setting the two 

fires and ordered to pay $101,747 in restitution. The Federal judge on the case recommended 

King for a “boot camp” program for part of his sentence time. He was ordered not to return 

to the firefighting profession upon his release. He will be on supervised probation for three 

years after he serves his sentences.
16 U.S. Fire Administration/Technical Report Series

IMPACT OF FIREFIGHTER ARSON

When firefighters commit arson, the impact can be far reaching, as mentioned previously. Firefighters 

who set criminal fires are responsible for a chain of consequences that negatively affect department 

unity, public trust, and oversight.

Public Trust

The efforts of firefighters across the nation and internationally embody many of the values and 

traditions long respected and admired by the citizens they serve. Firefighters devote many hours 

acquiring essential training and protecting lives and property, while sometimes having to place their 

own lives and physical well-being in jeopardy. Firefighters are trusted community helpers and role 

models for service to others. Unfortunately, each year the public and members of the fire and rescue 

service are surprised to learn that a few firefighters have been responsible for setting fires. Motives 

not withstanding, the effect is the same: public trust in the fire department involved, and morale 

within department, suffer.

The actions of this small number of individuals can even place communities and citizens at greater 

risk. If a firefighter arsonist is discovered, public confidence in the fire department wanes, even if 

only temporarily. For the community, a firefighter who intentionally endangers property and safety 

represents a breach of trust. Public outrage may result and there can be financial repercussions. The 

withdrawal of community support can affect the financial resources available to the fire service, 

disrupt training, place equipment upgrades and purchases on hold, and alter budget planning. An 

organization that suffers from a poor reputation is less likely to attract high caliber applicants. If 

the problem continues, the standard for applicants and recruits can decline and the performance of 

members can drop.

Fire Department Impact

When a firefighter commits the crime of arson, the crime can impact not only the community 

he serves, but the department as well. First of all, firefighters may get injured or even die while 

responding to blazes that another firefighter started. That is the most direct, and tragic impact on 

a fire department. There also can be intense scrutiny from the public and other government agencies. The turmoil caused by allegations, investigations, and any subsequent prosecution impacts the 

department in ways that may not be obvious at first.

Recruiting new members for the fire department may become more difficult, or the quality of the 

applicants may decline. When information about the charges becomes fodder for the news media, 

potential quality recruits may decide to apply elsewhere to avoid the guilty-by-association stigma. 

Some members of departments that have experienced firefighter arson among their ranks liken it 

to the scarlet letter. Members may feel shunned by the public they serve and be questioned at fire 

scenes as to whether the fire they are working to suppress is suspicious.

Along with community distrust of the fire department comes distrust of the fire chief. The public, 

officials, and other firefighters generally raise questions as to why the fire chief was not aware there 

was a problem with one of his firefighters. There is sometimes reluctance on the part of the fire 

department’s management to report suspicions of firefighter arson to law enforcement because of 

the potential investigation that would likely follow.
USFA-TR-141/January 2003 17

When an allegation of firefighter arson is brought forward by the fire chief, disruption within the 

department quickly follows, whether or not these allegations prove to be true. Fire service leaders 

are in a tough spot. They may internally debate “what if I’m wrong” and hesitate to come forward, 

knowing that if the accusation is false, the ramifications would be great for the firefighter, the department, and himself. Employee morale suffers when there are allegations looming and ultimately can 

lead to in-fighting among department members.

Financial Consequences

Firefighters convicted of arson face serious economic consequences. In many of the cases researched 

for this report, sentencing included restitution; the amounts ranged from $5,000 to $250,000.

Insurance costs from property damage can reach into the millions. Fire suppression efforts come 

with a cost as well. The fire suppression and containment efforts for the Hayman Fire in Colorado 

and the Rodeo Fire in Arizona were estimated to cost $15 million and $10 million respectively. 

Volunteer, career, and wildland fire services have been forced to regroup and take a detailed inventory 

of the equipment they used during these fires. Almost all the fire agencies that responded will have 

to request grant assistance from the federal government to replace equipment that was damaged or 

destroyed during suppression efforts.

Table 2 outlines a number of firefighter arson incidents. It provides a glimpse of the crime and 

its financial impact. The examples are representative of the types of cases seen throughout the 

country.

Table 2. Firefighter Arson Incidents

Year and Location Age of Firefighter Estimated Loss Incident Descriptions

2002 

Martins Ferry, OH

25 and 20 Unlisted Two firefighters and a terminated former firefighter from the 

same department were arrested for setting a structure fire. 

The Fire Chief sated, “They put a bunch of firemen’s lives in 

jeopardy...and put a mark against us. They will be dropped...

we’ll just have to look for new people...”

2002

Brunswick, MD

31 $30,000 A firefighter is accused of setting a garage fire and with making 

a false report of a fire. The charges carry a combined maximum penalty of 25 years in jail plus fines exceeding $30,000 

dollars. The firefighter was being held in the Frederick 

County, MD jail on a $150,000 bond at time of report.

2002 

Kent County, MD

26 Unlisted The son of a local fire chief has been charged with second 

degree arson in a late September park pavilion fire. He also is 

alleged to have participated in setting fires in vacant dwellings, 

according to State Police and Fire Marshal’s Office investigators. The firefighter is serving a one year suspension form the 

fire department after entering an Alford plea to second-degree 

assault related to a non-fire incident in 2001. Lesser charges 

for sex offenses were dismissed.
18 U.S. Fire Administration/Technical Report Series

Table 2. Firefighter Arson Incidents (continued)

Year and Location Age of Firefighter Estimated Loss Incident Descriptions

2002

Columbia, PA

22 $197,295 A former volunteer was sentenced to 3-6 years in state prison 

with 14 years of probation for setting a string of fires in the 

Columbia, PA area. He is one of three former firefighters 

charged in the arson spree.

2002

Golden, CO

19 $120,000 A firefighter admitted to setting a fire that damaged a greenhouse and an adjacent building. He was charged with firstdegree arson, felony criminal mischief, first-degree criminal 

trespass, felony theft and burglary. He had been on duty and 

then left to run an errand; about 40 minutes after his return, the 

call about the greenhouse fire came in.

2002

Laurel, MD

20 Over $1 Million A firefighter was indicted on five counts of arson and related 

charges for fires dating back to 2000 in the Lanham area. He 

along with three other men from the fire department set fires 

that caused over $1 million in damages.

2002 

New Jersey

23 Unlisted A firefighter was charged with arson after setting fire to 

his apartment while people were sleeping inside. He told 

investigators he was behind on rent payments due to gambling 

problems.

2002

Ostander, OH

20 and 19 Century old barn 

and livestock

Two firefighters were charged with two barn fires, and allegations were made that they were responsible for a string of 

other fires in central Ohio.

2001-02

Hanover, PA

20 Over 

$1 Million

A firefighter charged with seven arson in York County, claims 

he has multiple personalities and that “Samantha” actually lit 

the fires. Most of the fires were small and no one was injured. 

He faces over 40 felony charges for the incidents.

2001 

Long Island, NY

19 Unlisted A probationary, volunteer firefighter admitted to torching a 

Long Island flower shop in an attempt to become a hero by 

putting out the blaze. He was charged with arson and criminal 

trespass.

2001 

Stevensville, MD

20 Unlisted In April 2001, a volunteer firefighter was arrested by the State 

Fire Marshal’s Office in connection with two arsons on Kent 

Island. He was charged with second-degree arson and three 

counts of malicious burning of property for burning a truck 

trailer behind a Kmart store. Thirty-three firefighters from 

surrounding communities were needed to extinguish that fire. 

He also set a trash container on fire. His motive was to have 

a chance to go out on a fire call with the Kent Island Volunteer 

Fire Department.
USFA-TR-141/January 2003 19

Table 2. Firefighter Arson Incidents (continued)

Year and Location Age of Firefighter Estimated Loss Incident Descriptions

2001

Rochester, NY

25 Death of 

wife and 3 

children

Firefighter was charged with killing his wife age 23 and their 

four children, aged 15 months to 6 years old by setting fire 

to their home in western New York. He was arraigned on 

charges of second-degree murder and arson, with a potential 

penalty of 25 years to life in prison.

2001

Stockbridge, MA

17 Unlisted A juvenile, training to be a firefighter had recently been hailed 

a hero for rescuing his grandmother from a burning building. 

He was arrested for setting a string of fires, including one that 

destroyed the Great Barrington lumber mill.

2001

Madison County, NC

19 Unlisted A firefighter was charged with numerous counts of arson 

involving forest fires and structure fires. When asked why he 

did it he said, “I just like to put the fire out.” The investigation 

revealed that every fire he was charged with he had called in. 

He is a prime suspect in several other incidents, too.

2001 

Clark County, OH

32 Unlisted A volunteer firefighter was charged with four counts of 

aggravated arson in four fires in a mobile-home complex near 

Springfield. In one of the fires, the firefighter rescued his 

girlfriend’s sons from her burning mobile home.

2000

Henning, TN

46 Unlisted The Fire Chief of the Henning Fire Department was indicated 

for setting ablaze the fire station that was destroyed by the fire. 

Special agents from ATF, the State Fire Marshal Bomb and 

Arson Section and the State Bureau of Investigation cooperated on the sensitive case.

1999

Henagar, AL

19 Over $1 million for 

multiple fires

The Fire Chief had the Police Department run background 

checks on all unfamiliar volunteers, one of whom (along with 

two juveniles aged 15 and 17) was charged with five counts 

of second-degree arson following a year-long investigation. 

The firefighter was hired by another fire department upon his 

dismissal from Henagar. One of the fires he is accused of setting caused damages estimated at close to $1 million dollars. 

The last fire he is accused of setting was started three hours 

before his arrest.

1992-94

Suffolk County, NY

Nine firefighters in 

multiple incidents

$1.5 million and 

two deaths

1992: One firefighter was arrested and convicted of setting 

fires. 1993: 35 firefighters – 8 of whom were from three different departments in Suffolk County – were arrested for arson 

throughout the state that year.

International

Australia 18 Unlisted A firefighter set fire to a school so he could impress students 

with his uniform. Police investigating the arson found 60 pairs of 

underwear in his home. Psychologist testimony showed that the 

arson and sexual fetishism were fueled by low self-esteem and 

the need to impress people.
20 U.S. Fire Administration/Technical Report Series

Table 2. Firefighter Arson Incidents (continued)

Year and Location Age of Firefighter Estimated Loss Incident Descriptions

Tasmania 26 $73,000 Burnie Supreme Court heard testimony from a firefighter who set 

fire to 14 houses plus some shed and scrub fires to gain favor 

from his bosses. The blaze took days to control. Personnel 

and heavy equipment had to be called in to fight it. He had 

joined the Zeehan Volunteer Fire Brigade in 1988 when he 

was 13.

Tokyo, Japan Unknown Unknown A firefighter was arrested for a series of arson attacks, to which 

he admitted. He said he started the fires “to vent my frustrations.” The firefighter is also a construction worker. About 60 

suspicious fires in construction areas had broken out since 

August of 1999, and the arsonist admitted to starting more than 

10 of them.

PREVENTION OF FIREFIGHTER ARSON

In an effort to combat firefighter arson, several states have developed programs to educate members 

of the fire service about the problem. Proactive prevention and awareness programs to combat firefighter arson try to instill in cadet firefighters, as well as in seasoned veterans, that there should be 

zero tolerance for the degrading and dangerous behavior exhibited by firefighter arsonists. There is 

a growing awareness of the serious implications of firefighter arson to the well being of the community and the fire service. At the same time, there is an increasing recognition that something needs 

to be done to reduce the potential of firefighter arson.

The keys to prevention seem to lie in recognizing the problem, acknowledging the serious threat it 

poses to public safety and to the credibility of the fire service, and improving screening procedures 

for new recruits. These preventative actions require the cooperation of all relevant authorities and a 

commitment to address the problem at a National level as well.

Several fire service leaders in the United States have taken active steps to ward off the potential for 

firesetting among department members. Some have created task forces; others have added the topic 

to their fire training curriculum or set up special projects. A few states have succeeded in getting 

new laws passed that strengthen penalties for arson, while others have developed information for 

firefighters on the criminal justice system and the legal issues that an offender faces if charged with 

arson. State fire academies in some parts of the country explain in firefighter recruit classes that there 

is a zero tolerance policy for firefighter arson. The lectures to new firefighters stress that arson is a 

crime their peers will not tolerate.

Below is a summary of several state programs currently underway.

Pennsylvania Firefighter Arson Task Force

Founded in the fall of 2000, the Firefighter Arson Task Force was created to provide training to the 

fire leaders in Pennsylvania’s fire companies, and to help identify potential arsonists among the ranks. 

The task force is composed of “officials with the knowledge, experience, and influence necessary to 
USFA-TR-141/January 2003 21

effect change in the situation.” The task force was established in order to address the need to alert 

and inform fire service and other allied personnel to the dangers and repercussions of intentionally 

setting fires.

The Firefighter Arson Task Force developed awareness education programs, to target the prevention of 

firefighter arson, and a policy for mitigating existing problems. The State Fire Academy offers training programs that now address the subject of firefighter arson. Curriculum elements may be incorporated into one or more of the state’s programs: the 88-hour Essentials of Firefighting, the Arson Awareness 

for Emergency Personnel class, and the stand alone program, Firefighter Arsonist Prevention and Mitigation.

The programs stress awareness that firefighter arson could happen, the consequences of such acts, 

an overview of the state laws regarding arson, and actions to mitigate the problem. The program 

emphasizes the importance of prevention, education, and training with a combined effort from both 

the firefighter and the fire service.

To help discourage the intentional misuse of fire by firefighters, the Office of the Pennsylvania State 

Fire Commissioner has worked on creating ways that could identify whether someone interested in 

joining a fire department has any record of firesetting. Indeed, early fascination and experimentation 

with fire is a common precursor to arson.

Conducting background checks on new applicants is becoming a more common feature of preemployment screening in many public safety agencies. The Office of the Pennsylvania State Fire 

Commissioner, however, recognizes that background checks can be more difficult to carry out 

within the volunteer fire service than they are in career departments for reasons of cost and time. 

Moreover, many non-urban areas protected by volunteer firefighters are struggling to recruit and 

retain fire department members. Wanting to encourage, not discourage, new members, volunteer 

department may hesitate to add another hurdle like background investigations to the list of membership requirements.

The Office of the State Fire Marshal in Pennsylvania, therefore, has prepared an alternative that 

accomplishes some of what a background check would accomplish, and provides a measure of 

protection from liability for the fire department should they ever experience an incident involving 

firefighter arson. The Office makes available to Pennsylvania fire departments, a sample one-page 

statement, Affidavit For Fire Company Membership, wherein applicants affirm that they have never been 

convicted, pleaded no lo contender, or been found guilty of the crime of arson or of false alarms to 

public safety agencies. The statement further asserts that the applicant has made full disclosure of 

all arrests, convictions, or adjudications for other criminal offenses. The affidavit must be signed by 

the applicant and by a magistrate. It becomes part of the applicant’s file. A copy of the document is 

included in Appendix A.

Suffolk County, New York Arson Task Force

The Suffolk County Arson Task Force educates its firefighters on the criminal justice system and 

mandates background checks. The lessons taught in the Suffolk County Arson Task Force classes 

make the firefighters aware of the impact of arson on the firefighter, both criminally and socially, by 

using the “scared straight” approach. The program shows firefighters how their arrest would affect 

family, friends, career, and freedom. The program also reminds firefighters of their commitment and 

responsibility to the community.
22 U.S. Fire Administration/Technical Report Series

New York State, Office of Fire Prevention and Control--

Fire Service Organization and Fire Behavior: Firefighter Firesetters

In response to the occurrences of firefighter arson in the State of New York, the State Office of Fire 

Prevention and Control developed a curriculum that can be taught to incoming classes of new fire 

cadets. Rather than speak informally about firefighter arson, instructors follow a comprehensive 

outline with chapters that were developed for the Academy. The curriculum begins with information 

on the legal system, the crime of arson, and the penalties an offender may face.

Each chapter has lesson objectives and the instructor emphasizes throughout the serious nature of 

arson and the associated penalties for conviction. When the material was originally produced, some 

of the legal penalties were different. New York recently has taken great strides to change what level 

an offender may plea to, and what sentencing would subsequently result from an arson conviction.

After discussion of the legal ramifications of firefighter arson, the program goes on to include a 

section on community impact. Topics discussed here address the impact of firefighter arson on the 

community the firefighter serves, the impact on family and friends, and the financial burden that 

could result. Included in this portion is information on the impact the crime would have on the fire 

department itself. The curriculum indicates that the crime would have a negative Impact on recruitment, the public image of the department, support for the department, and embarrassment to the 

fire department.

Finally, the program stresses that each firefighter has the duty and responsibility to promote and support arson control measures within their community as the first line of defense in combating arson. 

Candidates are taught that not only would arson cause a “black eye” to the department, the stigma of 

an arson conviction is something that they would regret for the rest of their lives.

South Carolina Forestry Commission

In 1993-94, the South Carolina Forestry Commission developed a general, descriptive profile of 

fire service personnel who had been arrested for arson. The profile was recognized by the Southern 

Group of State Foresters as being reasonably accurate in describing firefighter arsonists throughout 

the southern region of the United States. Then, in 1997, the Southern Group received a grant from 

the National Wildlife Coordinating Group to develop a written instrument that could identify any 

firefighter applicants who may be predisposed to firesetting. The project was assigned to the South 

Carolina Forestry Commission.

The South Carolina Forestry Commission contracted with a criminology professor at Central Missouri 

State University to develop the instrument. The consultant serves as an advisor to the FBI and the 

National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime, and is the co-author of NCAVC’s Essential Findings 

from a Study of Serial Arsonists.

The Arson Screening and Prediction System (ASAP)11 created for the South Carolina Forestry 

Commission was designed to be administered, scored, and evaluated by field level fire administrators. Based on the numeric score, a fire leader can ascertain whether a particular recruit or firefighter 

11 The instrument does not presume to identify an individual as an arsonist, nor is it intended as a criterion for acceptance or rejection of any applicant for a firefighting position. It simply compares a subject’s responses with the profile 

characteristics.
USFA-TR-141/January 2003 23

may be predisposed to commit arson. The test is a “user-friendly” tool of sorts that does not need 

to be sent off for analysis. The fire leader utilizing this test can review the answers immediately and 

determine the best course of action from there.

The assessment instrument is based on eight specific domains:

I. Personal

 Age, race, gender

II. Marital and Family

 Relationship with father and mother, marital adjustment, rearing environment

III. Occupational

 Employment and work history

IV. Social Interaction

 Social skills, interpersonal skills, empathy, interpersonal problem solving

V. Personal and Emotional Needs

 Self-control, impulsiveness, aggressive tendencies, anger threshold, life planning

VI. Self Esteem

 Intelligence, academic performance, self-esteem

VII. Stress

 Financial management, income levels, family and legal stress

VIII. Fire Service Attitudes

 Fascination with the fire service and its trappings

Forty questions were developed to explore each of these domains. Four responses are provided for 

each question; test subjects are instructed to select the response that most closely describes their feelings about the question. The questions are simply phrased using common vocabulary. Most subjects 

complete the questionnaire in about a half-hour.12

Scoring the Instrument

The possible responses to each question are assigned values of 1 through 4; the composite score for 

any screening will lie in a range of 40 through 160. The higher the score, the more the applicant 

resembles the general profile of a firefighter arsonist. Scores of 80 or less indicate the applicant does 

not fit the general profile in any significant way. Scores of 120 or more indicate a high degree of 

match to the general profile. Scores in the 81-119 ranges are subject to interpretation. Use of the 

answer sheet simplifies the scoring of the instrument.

Delaware State Fire Marshal’s Office and Delaware State Fire School

One of the first states to publicly recognize that in rare cases, firefighters set fires, was Delaware. In 

1994 the State Fire Marshal and the Director of the Delaware State Fire School released a course, 

12 More specific information and test questions may be obtained by contacting Kenneth Cabe, Information Officer, South 

Carolina Forestry Commission, PG Box 21707, Columbia, SC 29221-1707.
24 U.S. Fire Administration/Technical Report Series

“Firefighter Arson Awareness”. The course was created to provide fire service students with training 

on the problem of firefighter arson and what can be done to correct the problem. The messages are 

clear:

Arson is a problem;

Firefighter arson is also a problem;

Firefighter arson occurs in Delaware;

It is not acceptable; and

Offenders will be investigated and prosecuted.

The fire service constituency in the state supported the training, recognizing that it takes only a small 

fraction of all firefighters to cause serious harm to the fire service’s reputation and community support. Preventing firefighter arson from occurring is an important goal.

“Registration Law” Legislation

In South Carolina, a law passed May 23, 2001 requires registration of all new firefighters hired after 

July 1, 2001. The South Carolina Firefighters Employment and Registration Act allows for criminal 

background checks of new firefighters. Firefighters hired prior to June 30, 2001 are required to 

register with the South Carolina State Fire Marshal, however, a criminal background check was considered “not necessary.

Members of the fire service in South Carolina consider this Bill to be one of the most important ever 

sought. Mandating firefighter registration and criminal background checks is a proactive tool to prevent firefighter arson. The Bill requires the State Fire Marshal’s office to create an identification number for each registrant and to maintain relevant records on the firefighters. Firefighters employed by 

a public fire department are required to register, or will not be allowed to perform firefighting duties. 

The public fire departments are also required to notify the State Fire Marshals office within sixty days 

of a firefighter separating his employment.

Exceptions to the registration law were firefighters employed by the United States government or an 

individual engaged in firefighting duties during a declared state emergency. The law also includes 

this mandate:

A person who is convicted, pleads guilty or no contest, or otherwise admits guilt, regardless of 

adjudication, to a felony, arson related crime, use of an illegal substance, or abuse of a controlled 

substance within the last ten years, shall not be allowed to perform firefighting duties in the State of 

South Carolina on or after July 1, 2001. After the expiration of the ten-year period, the Fire Chief 

has the option and discretion to determine whether or not to hire a person with a criminal record 

as a firefighter.

A full text version of Bill S.390 and examples of South Carolina Firefighter Registration forms are 

included in Appendix B.

South Carolina was the only state where an enacted “registration law” could be found. This type of 

legislation should possibly be considered in other states to help prevent firefighter arson. It is useful 

in preventing firefighter arson and preempting current offenders from “department jumping” to 

other fire services within the state.

•

•

•

•

•
USFA-TR-141/January 2003 25

Criminal Background Checks

Over a decade ago, the FBI began creating an arson profile. It was about this time that several fire 

departments began doing criminal background checks and psychological testing on firefighter applicants. The problems associated with a firefighter arsonist can be reduced with applicant screening 

and background examinations. While screening cannot be 100 percent effective for a fire department 

any more than for a police department, when combined with a background check the possibility 

of hiring a potential arsonist, or current one, is generally thought to be reduced. The percentage of 

reduction, however, is speculative and data is not currently available to verify the impact. Measures 

such as these are preventative, but can be expensive.

Combining screening and background checks for an applicant may alert a fire leader that a prospective member has a criminal history. In the little research that has been conducted on firefighter 

arson, there was evidence that some of the individuals were convicted of arson in one state, and then 

moved to another state only to set more fires.

In conjunction with the Suffolk County Arson Task Force, the Suffolk County Police Arson Squad 

provides applicant screening. Suffolk County asks applicants to sign a waiver that would allow the 

County to inspect the applicant’s criminal history as part of the department’s application process. 

Failure to sign the waiver precludes the applicant from further consideration. The waiver for criminal 

history checks as a pre-employment requirement can be a simple and effective screening measure.

In the State of New York in February of 1999, Chapter 423, The Executive Law was amended to add 

a new section 837-o, which requires fire chiefs to obtain an arson history background check of any 

applicant for membership in a volunteer fire company. The law became effective on April 1, 2000. 

The check is to be conducted by the Division of Criminal Justice Services at no cost to the applicant 

or the fire company. If history of an arson conviction is found, the applicant is barred from membership. The Town Law, Village Law, and Not-for- profit Corporation Law were also amended to require 

the arson history checks.

The amendment in New York State’s law came after years of fire officials lobbying to make a conviction of arson in any degree an absolute bar to membership in a fire company. Chapter 423’s intent 

is to strengthen the ability of fire companies to police their own ranks by enabling fire chiefs to 

require new volunteer firefighter applicants, including those who transfer between fire companies, 

to undergo an arson conviction record check prior to acceptance as members. The New York law is 

provided in Appendix C.

Even with all of the efforts a fire department may take to prevent a potential firefighter arsonist from 

joining their department, some still slip through the cracks. Following is an account of a volunteer 

firefighter who moved from one state to another and applied to a new volunteer fire department, 

and then finally a career fire department. It is easy to see that even with the system in place for background checks, diligence is still required on the part of the fire department. The following example 

is a case in point.
26 U.S. Fire Administration/Technical Report Series

Case Study #8

Criminal Background Checks, Texas

A firefighter was convicted of burning a vehicle as a part of an insurance fraud. He received 

probation in a plea bargain for a reduced charge. The firefighter then moved to another 

state and joined another small volunteer fire department. While there, a series of arson fires 

occurred in that jurisdiction. Strong circumstantial evidence pointed to the firefighter as the 

prime suspect, and an investigation commenced, but before charges could be filed against 

the individual, he applied, and was accepted as a recruit in a large career fire department in 

another state: Texas.

Since the prior criminal conviction did not occur in Texas, it was not initially discovered during the pre-employment background check. Furthermore, since the arson-related offense 

was originally listed in a category unique to that states classification system, the system in 

Texas “translated” it to a similarly worded misdemeanor category. Consequently, when asked 

if he had ever committed a felony, the applicant said, “No,” and a polygraph showed no 

deception during pre-employment screening. Fortunately, the prior criminal history and 

the on-going arson investigation in the other state were discovered while the person was in 

training for the career fire department. He was subsequently dismissed from employment 

with the fire department.

v v v

Firefighter arson is not a trivial problem for the fire service. Its importance is measured not by large 

numbers of incidents, but by the serious impact of the very few which do occur. The problem may 

be increasing or maybe is just now capturing the attention of the media, but the number of cases 

that have recently come to light indicates the need for better screening and adequate arson awareness training programs for firefighters. The 99.9 percent of the nation’s law-abiding fire and rescue 

personnel have only to gain from bringing to light the .01 percent of the fire service who endanger 

their colleagues and the citizens they are sworn to protect.
USFA-TR-141/January 2003 27

Appendix A

Affidavit For Fire Company Membership

The Office of the State Fire Marshal in Pennsylvania
28 U.S. Fire Administration/Technical Report Series
USFA-TR-141/January 2003 29

Appendix B

“South Carolina Firefighters 

Employment and Registration Act”

South Carolina Legislature

General Assembly General Bill S.390

and

South Carolina State Fire Marshal’s Office

Firefighter Registration Forms
30 U.S. Fire Administration/Technical Report Series
USFA-TR-141/January 2003 31
32 U.S. Fire Administration/Technical Report Series
USFA-TR-141/January 2003 33
34 U.S. Fire Administration/Technical Report Series
USFA-TR-141/January 2003 35
36 U.S. Fire Administration/Technical Report Series
37

Appendix C

State of New York S2657-A LAVALLE Chapter 423

Section 176.b.16 Town Law, State of New York

Article 35 Division of Criminal Justice Services Section 837-o,

Executive Law

Article 150, Section 150.01 Arson in the fifth degree
38 U.S. Fire Administration/Technical Report Series

S2657-A LAVALLE Chapter 423 STATE OF NEW YORK

S. 2657-A A. 4736-A

Cal. No. 625 R. R. 112

1999–2000 Regular Sessions

SENATE - ASSEMBLY

February 16, 1999

§ 837-o. Search for arson conviction records of volunteer firefighter applicants.

1. Any person who applies for membership in a fire company, as such term is defined in 

section three of the volunteer firefighters’ benefit law, or who seeks to transfer as a member 

to another fire company, shall be required to authorize the submission of his or her name 

and other authorized identifying information to the division which shall search its files for 

records indicating whether the person stands convicted of the crime of arson. The chief of 

the fire company to which application is made shall provide written notice to the applicant 

that a search will be conducted, and if the applicant desires to proceed, he or she shall 

complete a search request on the form provided for this purpose by the division of criminal 

justice services.

2. The chief of the fire company shall send the completed search request form to either 

(i) the sheriff’s department of the county in which the fire company is located, or (ii) the 

department of state, office of fire prevention and control, as follows:

(a) the sheriff’s department of the county in which the fire company is located shall be 

responsible for receiving the search requests and processing the search requests with the 

division, unless the county legislative body adopts and files with the secretary of state pursuant to the municipal home rule law a local law providing that the sheriff’s department shall 

not have such responsibility;

(b) in all other instances where a county legislative body has adopted a local law pursuant 

to paragraph (a) of this subdivision, the department of state, office of fire prevention and 

control shall be responsible for receiving search requests and forwarding the search requests 

to the division. The department of state, office of fire prevention and control is hereby authorized to establish a communication network with the division for the purpose of forwarding 

search requests and receiving search results pursuant to paragraph (b) of this subdivision.

3. (a) All searches concerning the application for membership in a fire company shall be 

conducted under the provisions of subdivision six of section eight hundred thirty-seven of 

this article without the assessment of any fee to the applicant or fire company and shall pertain solely to ascertaining whether the applicant stands convicted of arson.
USFA-TR-141/January 2003 39

 (b) The results of the search shall be communicated in writing to the chief of the fire 

company from which the search request originated by either the sheriff’s department or the 

department of state, office of fire prevention and control, and shall be kept confidential by 

the chief, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this subdivision. The results of the search 

shall only state either that: (i) the applicant stands convicted of arson, or (ii) the applicant 

has no record of conviction for arson. The results of the search shall not divulge any other 

information relating to the criminal history of the applicant.

 (c) At the time an applicant is advised that he or she is ineligible for membership due to 

a record of conviction for arson, he or she shall also be advised of the rights to challenge 

and appeal the information contained in the record of conviction as provided in the rules 

and regulations of the division. The applicant shall continue to be barred from membership until all administrative and judicial challenges to the accuracy of such information or 

appeals therefore, are ultimately resolved in his or her favor, or if such a determination is 

unchallenged.

§ 3. Section 176-b of the town law is amended by adding a new subdivision 17 to read as 

follows:

17. Upon application by any person for membership in a fire company operating pursuant 

to this section, the fire chief shall cause the applicant’s background to be checked pursuant 

to section eight hundred thirty-seven-o of the executive law for a criminal history involving 

a conviction for arson.

§ 4. Section 10-1006 of the village law is amended by adding a new subdivision 19 to read 

as follows:

19. Upon application by any person for membership in a fire company operating pursuant 

to this section, the fire chief shall cause the applicant’s background to be checked pursuant 

to section eight hundred thirty-seven-o of the executive law for a criminal history involving 

a conviction for arson.

§ 5. Paragraph (c) of section 1402 of the not-for-profit corporation law is amended by adding a new subparagraph 5 to read as follows:

(5) Upon application by any person for membership in a fire corporation operating pursuant to this section, the fire chief shall cause the applicant’s background to be checked 

pursuant to section eight hundred thirty-seven-o of the executive law for a criminal history 

involving a conviction for arson.

§ 6. This act shall take effect April 1, 2000 except that the division of criminal justice services 

and the department of state are immediately authorized to promulgate such rules and regulations necessary to implement this act on or before such effective date.
40 U.S. Fire Administration/Technical Report Series
USFA-TR-141/January 2003 41
42 U.S. Fire Administration/Technical Report Series
USFA-TR-141/January 2003 43
44 U.S. Fire Administration/Technical Report Series
USFA-TR-141/January 2003 45