alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2015-2119 Directorate ID: 2015-SW-005-AD

Helicopter Model: Agusta S.p.A Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 34 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to prevent blade failure and subsequent loss of 

control of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $143,000

Labor per Helicopter

(1 work hour X $85 for 

inspection)

$85

Other

(Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $143,085

Total US Fleet Cost

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Martin Crane
BCD 2024-26 BA # 5340

(Issued 07/30/2024)

Name changed from

CCET, LLC

to

Cincinnati Eastern Railroad, LLC

NO DECISION PUBLISHED
#### § 8a.540 Advertising.

A recipient shall not in any advertising related to employment indicate preference, limitation, specification, or discrimination based on sex unless sex is a bona fide occupational qualification for the particular job in question.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Brett White, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of
Corio, Inc.

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the
financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying
officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-
15(e) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: June 3, 2004



|/s/   BRETTWHITE                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|Brett WhiteExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer

---
NRC SEEKS PUBLIC INPUT TO FY 2012 PROPOSED FEE RULE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission seeks public comments on the proposed changes to

its regulations for the licensing, inspection and annual fees it charges applicants and licensees for 

fiscal year (FY) 2012. The proposed fee rule, published today in the Federal Register, includes 

fees required by law to recover approximately 90 percent of the agency’s budget authority. 

The NRC received a total appropriation of $1,038.1 million for fiscal year 2012. Based 

on the FY 2012 budget submitted to the Congress, the total amount of fees the NRC has to 

recover by Sept. 30 is approximately $909.5 million, about one percent ($6.3 million) less than 

in FY 2011. Approximately 40 percent of the fees (10 CFR Part 170) will be billed for specific 

services to recover the cost of special benefits to identifiable applicants and licensees and the 

remaining 60 percent will be billed as annual fees (10 CFR Part 171). 

The proposed rule includes several changes. First, the NRC is proposing to change the 

current hourly rate of $273 to $274 for FY 2012. This increase in hourly rate is a result of an 

increase in agency direct budgetary resources from FY 2011. Second, the NRC would revise the 

flat license application fees in 10 CFR Parts 170.21 and 170.31 to reflect the new hourly rate.

Finally, the FY 2012 proposed annual fees would increase for some licenses due to increased 

direct budgeted resources for most material users, fuel facilities and transportation. However, the 

annual fees would decrease for operating nuclear reactors, research and test reactors, spent fuel 

storage facilities and most uranium recovery licenses. 

The NRC is continuing its efforts to keep its fees as low as possible by ensuring its 

programs are conducted efficiently and effectively, and requesting from Congress only the 

resources necessary to perform its mission of protecting people and the environment.

Comments on the proposed rule are due by April 16, 2012, and may be submitted 

through the federal government’s Rulemaking website at www.regulations.gov using Docket ID 

NRC-2011-0207 or by e-mail to Rulemaking.Comments@nrc.gov. They may also be mailed to 

Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., 20555-0001, ATTN: 

Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 12-026 March 16, 2012
For more information on the NRC Plans, Budget and Performance visit the NRC website.

###

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand.

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.
### §3563. Notification of eligibility

The Secretary shall notify the parent or guardian of each eligible person whose eligibility is based on the death or disability of a parent or on a parent being listed in one of the categories referred to in section 3501(a)(1)(C) of this title of the educational assistance available to such person under this chapter. Such notification shall be provided not later than the month in which such eligible person attains such person's thirteenth birthday or as soon thereafter as feasible.

(Added Pub. L. 91–219, title II, §207(a), Mar. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 82, §1763; amended Pub. L. 94–502, title III, §310(24), Oct. 15, 1976, 90 Stat. 2392; Pub. L. 97–295, §4(46), Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1308; Pub. L. 101–237, title IV, §423(b)(1)(A), Dec. 18, 1989, 103 Stat. 2092; renumbered §3563 and amended Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), (c)(1), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 406; Pub. L. 109–444, §3(b)(5), Dec. 21, 2006, 120 Stat. 3307; Pub. L. 109–461, title III, §301(b)(5), title X, §1006(b), Dec. 22, 2006, 120 Stat. 3427, 3468.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–461, §1006(b), provided that as of the enactment of Pub. L. 109–461, the amendments made by Pub. L. 109–444 were deemed for all purposes not to have taken effect and that Pub. L. 109–444 ceased to be in effect. See Amendment notes below and section 1006(b) of Pub. L. 109–461, set out as a Coordination of Provisions With Pub. L. 109–444 note under section 101 of this title.

Pub. L. 109–461, §301(b)(5), substituted "each eligible person whose eligibility is based on the death or disability of a parent or on a parent being listed in one of the categories referred to in section 3501(a)(1)(C) of this title" for "each eligible person defined in section 3501(a)(1)(A) of this title".

Pub. L. 109–444, which substituted "each eligible person whose eligibility is based on the death or disability of a parent or on a parent being listed in one of the categories referred to in section 3501(a)(1)(C) of this title" for "each eligible person defined in section 3501(a)(1)(A) of this title", was terminated by Pub. L. 109–461, §1006(b). See Amendment notes above.

1991—Pub. L. 102–83 renumbered section 1763 of this title as this section and substituted "3501(a)(1)(A)" for "1701(a)(1)(A)".

1989—Pub. L. 101–237 substituted "Secretary" for "Administrator".

1982—Pub. L. 97–295 substituted "of this title" for "of this chapter".

1976—Pub. L. 94–502 substituted "such person's" for "his".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2006 Amendment

Amendment by section 301(b)(5) of Pub. L. 109–461 applicable with respect to a payment of educational assistance for a course of education pursued after Dec. 22, 2006, see section 301(d) of Pub. L. 109–461, set out as a note under section 3501 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1976 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 94–502 effective Oct. 15, 1976, see section 703(b) of Pub. L. 94–502, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3693 of this title.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.87

                    SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         This Second Amendment (this "First Amendment") is dated effective July
1, 2003 by and among Kramont Operating Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited
partnership (the "Company"), Kramont Realty Trust, a Maryland real estate
investment trust ("Kramont") and George S. Demuth ("Executive").

                                   BACKGROUND

         WHEREAS, the parties hereto entered into an Employment Agreement
effective as of July 1, 2001, as amended by First Amendment dated July 1, 2002,
(herein referred to as "Employment Agreement"), wherein the parties agreed to
the terms and conditions of Executive's employment with the Company; and

         WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to further amend certain of the
terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement.

         NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants
herein contained, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties hereto
agree as follows:

         1.       All capitalized terms used herein, but not otherwise defined,
shall have the meanings ascribed in the Employment Agreement.

         2.       Paragraph 4 (a) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended
to show that the Base Salary of Executive is increased to $206,000.00, effective
July 1, 2003.

         3.       Paragraph 5 (c) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended
to show that in accordance with the Kramont 2000 Incentive Plan, the Company
hereby grants the Executive 5,981 restricted shares of common stock under the
terms and conditions contained in a share grant letter agreement (the "Share
Grant Agreement"), the form of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof
as Exhibit "A". Simultaneous with the execution of this Second Amendment,
Executive agrees to execute and deliver to the Company the Share Grant
Agreement.

         4.       This Second Amendment and the Employment Agreement represent
the entire understanding between the parties and supercede all other oral or
written agreements between the parties. The Employment Agreement, as amended by
this Second Amendment, is hereby ratified and confirmed and remains in full
force and effect.

<PAGE>

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this
Second Amendment as of the date and year first above written.

                                    KRAMONT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.

                                    By: ________________________________________
                                        Louis P. Meshon, Sr.
                                        President

                                    KRAMONT REALTY TRUST

                                    By: ________________________________________
                                        Louis P. Meshon, Sr.
                                        President

                                    Executive

                                    By: ________________________________________
                                        George S. Demuth
### §2001. Definitions

As used in this chapter—

(1) "Fund" means the Postal Service Fund established by section 2003 of this chapter;

(2) Competitive products fund.—The term "Competitive Products Fund" means the Postal Service Competitive Products Fund established by section 2011; and

(3) "obligations", when referring to debt instruments issued by the Postal Service, means notes, bonds, debentures, mortgages, and any other evidence of indebtedness.

(Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 738; Pub. L. 109–435, title IV, §401(b)(1), Dec. 20, 2006, 120 Stat. 3225.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Pars. (2), (3). Pub. L. 109–435 added par. (2) and redesignated former par. (2) as (3).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1971, pursuant to Resolution No. 71–9 of the Board of Governors. See section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note preceding section 101 of this title.
### §§20709a to 20709c. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 20709a, Pub. L. 115–392, §7, Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5253, which related to holistic training for Federal law enforcement officers and prosecutors, was redesignated as section 212 of Pub. L. 109–164 and transferred to section 20712 of this title.

Section 20709b, Pub. L. 115–393, title V, §501, Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5275, which related to encouraging a victim-centered approach to training of Federal law enforcement personnel, was redesignated as section 213 of Pub. L. 109–164 and transferred to section 20713 of this title.

Section 20709c, Pub. L. 115–393, title V, §504, Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5277, which related to training of tribal law enforcement and prosecutorial personnel, was redesignated as section 214 of Pub. L. 109–164 and transferred to section 20714 of this title.
AGENCY SPOTLIGHT

----

**March 1999**
**Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA)** --  IPAnet/PrivatizationLink, an Internet-basedinformation service operated by MIGA, an arm of the World Bank, has helped develop websites for NISprivatization agencies. New sites aimed at promoting foreign investment and offering new business opportunities inNIS countries include:
§ 1400.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) The purpose of this part is to set forth regulations for determination of group eligibility for MBDA assistance.
( b ) In order to be eligible to receive assistance from MBDA funded organizations, a concern must be a minority business enterprise. A minority business enterprise is a business enterprise that is owned or controlled by one or more socially or economically disadvantaged persons. Executive Order 11625 designates Blacks, Puerto-Ricans, Spanish-speaking Americans, American Indians, Eskimos, and Aleuts as persons who are socially or economically disadvantaged and thus eligible for MBDA assistance. Other groups designated are listed below in paragraph (c). The purpose of this regulation is to provide guidance to groups not previously designated as eligible for assistance who believe they are entitled to formal designation as “socially or economically disadvantage” under the Executive Order. Upon adequate showing by representatives of the group that the group is, as a whole, socially or economically disadvantaged the group will be so designated and its members will be eligible for MBDA assistance. Designation under Executive Order 11625 establishes eligibility status only for MBDA funded programs. It will not establish eligibility for any other Federal or Federally funded program.
( c ) In addition to those listed in E.O. 11625, members of the following groups have been designated as eligible to receive assistance: Hasidic Jews, Asian Pacific Americans, and Asian Indians.
NRC AND THE NORTH AMERICAN ELECTRIC RELIABILITY CORPORATION 

COORDINATE THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES FOR CYBER SECURITY REQUIREMENTS 

 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the North American Electric Reliability 

Corporation (NERC) have signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) that outlines each 

organization’s responsibility for applying cyber security requirements to nuclear power plants. The MOU 

was developed to ensure consistent regulation since the NRC and NERC have overlapping authority over 

cyber security at these commercial facilities. 

The MOU acknowledges the NRC’s regulatory responsibility for inspecting digital systems that 

can affect safety, security and emergency preparedness of a nuclear power plant as well as NERC’s 

responsibility for regulating digital systems related to continuity of electric power generation. As part of 

the MOU, the NRC and NERC agree to share information discovered during respective inspections that 

they believe may be relevant to any digital system governed by the other organization. Since under this 

provision NERC may need access to sensitive information or Safeguards Information, NERC has agreed 

to comply with NRC requirements related to protecting this information. 

Each entity is responsible for taking enforcement action consistent with its own statutory 

authority. To ensure consistent regulation, both organizations agree in the MOU to coordinate on any 

enforcement actions that might be necessary should a cyber security incident result in a violation of both 

NRC and NERC requirements. 

The MOU is in addition to a Memorandum of Agreement signed in July 2007 that generally 

outlines the relationship between the two organizations. It will be effective for five years unless 

terminated by either of the organizations. 

The NRC and NERC will hold a series of workshops to help U.S. nuclear power plants define 

which of their cyber systems and assets must comply with each organization’s requirements. 

A Federal Register notice outlining the details of the MOU was published today and is available 

at: http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/2010-229.htm. 

 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-005 January 11, 2010
405 P.2d 238

#### VILLAGE OF RUIDOSO DOWNS, New Mexico, E. E. Miller, Zeke Scott, H. H. Shier, and the Board of Trustees of the Village of Ruidoso Downs, New Mexico, Petitioners, v. Honorable George L. ZIMMERMAN, Judge of the District Court of Lincoln County, New Mexico, Respondent.

No. 7941.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Sept. 9, 1965.

CARMODY, Chief Justice, and CHAVEZ, NOBLE, MOISE and COMPTON, Justices, concurring.

Ordered that the alternative writ of prohibition heretofore issued herein on August 13, 1965, he and the same is hereby quashed for the reason that the issues herein are moot.
#### § 256.3 Procedure.

Arrangements for collaborative research by NIST with a Research Associate generally begin through discussions or correspondence between NIST scientists and representatives of potential sponsoring companies, trade associations or professional organizations. These preliminary steps are followed by the consummation of a Memorandum of Agreement which is signed by NIST, the sponsoring organization and the Research Associate. The agreement sets out the respective responsibilities and obligations of all parties.
REGIONAL CORNER: ASHGABAT, TURKMENISTAN

----

by Joan Morgan
**August 1997**
Ashgabat, capital of Turkmenistan, is the country's largest city and primary economic, industrial,administrative, and educational center.  Ashgabat is also the gateway to business in Turkmenistan,a Central Asian country with huge reserves of natural gas and petroleum.
With a population of 407,000, Ashgabat is located in the southern part of Turkmenistan at thefoot of the Kopet Dag mountain range in the Kara Kum desert. Although the capital is located inthe Ahal Velayat (region), it has its own municipal government.  Near Ashgabat is the Kara KumCanal, the largest irrigation system in the world.
More than 50 factories are located in Ashgabat, which is one of Turkmenistan's majormanufacturing centers.  Local enterprises include dairy and meat processing plants, bakeries, apetroleum-industry equipment plant, glass works, spinning mills, and silk factories.  It has severalmachine building and metal working enterprises and a cement plant.  Carpets made in Ashgabatare internationally renowned, and a number of textile manufacturers are also located in the vicinityof Ashgabat.
**Consumer Product Distribution**
### SUBCHAPTER I—NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE STATE GRANT PROGRAM
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Silver Star Energy,  Inc. on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007,  as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, David  Naylor,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/    David Naylor
David Naylor
Treasurer, Director
(Principal Financial Officer)


May 11, 2007


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.