alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 13.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Fibria Celulose S.A. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Guilherme Perboyre Cavalcanti, Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(i)                                     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)                                  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| By:    | /s/ Guilherme Perboyre   Cavalcanti |                                                   |
|--------|-------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name                                | Guilherme Perboyre Cavalcanti                          |   |
|   | Title:                              | Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer |   |

 

Dated: February 24, 2016

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
### SUBCHAPTER V—RENEWABLE ENERGY
§ 904.254 Interlocutory review. ( a ) Application for interlocutory review shall be made to the Judge. The application shall not be certified to the Administrator except when the Judge determines that: ( 1 ) The ruling involves a dispositive question of law or policy about which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion; or
( 2 ) An immediate ruling will materially advance the completion of the proceeding; or
( 3 ) The denial of an immediate ruling will cause irreparable harm to a party or the public.
( b ) Any application for interlocutory review shall: ( 1 ) Be filed with the Judge within 30 days after the Judge's ruling;
( 2 ) Designate the ruling or part thereof from which appeal is being taken;
( 3 ) Set forth the ground on which the appeal lies; and
( 4 ) Present the points of fact and law relied upon in support of the position taken.
( c ) Any party that opposes the application may file a response within 20 days after service of the application.
( d ) The certification to the Administrator by the Judge shall stay proceedings before the Judge until the matter under interlocutory review is decided.
### §203. Postmaster General; Deputy Postmaster General

The chief executive officer of the Postal Service is the Postmaster General appointed under section 202(c) of this title. The alternate chief executive officer of the Postal Service is the Deputy Postmaster General appointed under section 202(d) of this title.

(Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 721.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Aug. 12, 1970, see section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note preceding section 101 of this title.
EX-10.92



 






	 	 	 	 	 



Exhibit 10.92




EXHIBIT A




TO




ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION AMENDMENT – DOMESTIC BUSINESS CORPORATION




ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY





     Article 7 of the Articles of Incorporation of Erie Indemnity Company (the “Corporation”) is
hereby amended to add new subsections (h) and (i), the full text of which read as follows:



          “(h) Any action required or permitted to be taken at a meeting of the holders of Class B
Common Stock may be taken without a meeting if consent or consents thereto signed by the holders of
a majority of the Class B Common Stock then outstanding shall be filed in writing with the
Secretary of the Corporation.




            (i) All or any classes and series of shares of Common Stock of the Corporation, or any
part thereof, may be represented by certificates or be uncertificated.”




46
§ 781.2 Purposes of the Additional Protocol and APR. ( a ) *General.* The Additional Protocol is a supplement to the existing U.S.-IAEA Safeguards Agreement, which entered into force in 1980. It provides the IAEA with access to additional information about civil nuclear and nuclear-related items, materials, and activities and with physical access to reportable locations where nuclear facilities, materials, or ores are located (to ensure the absence of undeclared nuclear material and activities) and to other reportable locations and locations specified by the IAEA (to resolve questions or inconsistencies related to the U.S. Declaration). The Additional Protocol is based upon and is virtually identical to the IAEA Model Additional Protocol (see IAEA Information Circular, INFCIRC/540, at *http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/index.html*), except that it excludes IAEA access to activities with direct national security significance to the United States, or to locations or information associated with such activities, and provides for managed access in connection with those same activities and to locations or information associated with those activities.
( b ) *Purposes of the Additional Protocol.* The Additional Protocol is designed to enhance the effectiveness of the U.S.-IAEA Safeguards Agreement by providing the IAEA with information about aspects of the U.S. civil nuclear fuel cycle, including: Mining and concentration of nuclear ores; nuclear-related equipment manufacturing, assembly, or construction; imports, exports, and other activities involving certain source material (i.e., source material that has not reached the composition and purity suitable for fuel fabrication or for being isotopically enriched); imports and exports of specified nuclear equipment and non-nuclear material; nuclear fuel cycle-related research and development activities not involving nuclear material; and other activities involving nuclear material not currently subject to the U.S.-IAEA Safeguards Agreement (e.g., nuclear material that has been exempted from safeguards pursuant to paragraph 37 of INFCIRC/153 (Corrected) June 1972).
( c ) *Purposes of the Additional Protocol Regulations.* To fulfill certain obligations of the United States under the Additional Protocol, BIS has established the APR, which require the reporting of information to BIS (as described in parts 783 and 784 of the APR) from all persons and locations in the United States (as described in § 781.3(a) of the APR) with reportable activities. This information, together with information reported to other U.S. Government agencies and less any information to which the U.S. Government applies the national security exclusion, is aggregated into a U.S. declaration, which is submitted annually to the IAEA. The APR also provide for complementary access at such locations in accordance with the provisions in part 784 of the APR.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 224 (Monday, November 22, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 67940]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25837]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--American Association for Accreditation of 
Ambulatory Surgery Facilities

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 14, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the American Association 
for Accreditation of Ambulatory Surgery Facilities (``AAAASF'') has 
filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General 
and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal 
place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the 
nature and scope of its standards development activities. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: American 
Association for Accreditation of Ambulatory Surgery Facilities, Gurnee, 
IL. The nature and scope of AAAASF's standards development activities 
are: the development of standards by which single-specialty and multi-
specialty out-patient surgery facilities are accredited. The standards 
for accreditation of such surgery facilities are developed continually 
revised by AAAASF's committee of medical professionals.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-25837 Filed 11-19-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### § 801.9 [Reserved]
Amendment to Petition ID: FAA-2015-4030 01/04/16

Dear Sir or Madam,

I, William J. Camp wish to amend my petition to omit and proceed without the inclusion of “CLOSED SET 

FILMING” in the proposed operating usage of my Unmanned Aerial System (UAS). On Page 4, item entitled 

INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF THE PETITIONER and thus eliminating the requirement to provide a 

Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) as required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 

8, Section 1.

INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF THE PETITIONER originally stated:

 General aerial still photos 

 Commercial Media Applications i.e. Wedding Videography and Business Promotional Video 

 Wildlife population surveys 

 Real Estate marketing 

 Aerial inspections of public and private structures. 

I would like to amend this section to now read as follows:

The objective of WILLIAM J CAMP and his aerial operations is to safely provide high quality imaging for a 

variety of commercial, public, and residential uses, specifically targeting:

This exemption request, once granted would allow the petitioner to operate a

small unmanned aerial vehicle (UAVs), unmanned aircraft system (UAS) to

conduct bridge Inspections, flare stack inspection, utility-power generation

system inspections and patrolling, aerial inspection, photography and

videography of residential and commercial real estate, weddings, and wedding

events, aerial inspection, photography and videography of utility

infrastructure including but not limited to electrical power lines, wind

turbines and cell towers, pipeline inspection and patrolling, filmmaking,

cinematography, and videography, precision agriculture with on board

sensors, wildlife and forestry monitoring and mosquito and insect control,

aerial surveying, construction site inspection and monitoring, public entity

support operations, Aerial imaging for safety, monitoring and comparing work

efforts and completion percentages, and security of controlled environment

of various sites, aerial video and live video feed to assist with search and

rescue operations under the authority and support of local authority

officials, aerial video and photography for public and private use including

television, public events, and cinematography live feed and live

newsgathering, training to persons individually or belonging to both private

and public organizations to increase awareness and improve safety for

current and future UAS operations within the NAS, special events: including

high schools. Colleges, professional sports, open air events and fairs,

research, risk management and assessment, surface mining, disaster and catastrophe events.

I appreciate your further consideration on this matter and I’ve included my contact information below if 

there are any further concerns. 

Respectfully,

William J. Camp

wjcamp@gmail.com

305-879-8243
## Well Status indicators are STATUS and PERM_STATUS and OPERSTATUS. These

status indicators will help you understand what status the well is in. Here is a table that

will help explain the options that you will see.

ABBREVIATIONS USED IN STATUS FIELD ABBR EVIATIONS USED IN PERM_STATUS FIELD

UN UNKNOWN P PENDING

ND NEW DRILL E EXPIRED

SP SPUDDED C CANCELED

EX EXPIRED

CA CANCELED

AC ACTIVE

PA PLUGGED & ABANDONED



### POSSIBLE COMBINATIONS OF OG_STATUS AND PERMIT STATUS

STATUS PERM_STATUS

UN NULL No permit, spud, completion or plug date

UN NULL OR has plugging information with no Plugging_Comp_Date

UN P has plugging information with no Plugging_Comp_Date, permit pending

ND P No spud, completion or plug date pending permit

EX E No spud, completion or plug date expired permit

CA C No spud, completion or plug date canceled permit

SP NULL Spud date > completion or plug date

AC NULL Active well with no permit or completion date > permit date

AC P Active well with pending permit

AC E Act ive well with expired permit approved after completion date

PA NULL Plugged well with no permit or plug date > permit date

PA P Plugged well with pending permit

PA E Plugged well with expired permit approved after plugging date



### There is a rare occasi on that a Well has a canceled status. This occurs when an intent to drill is canceled on

a new drill (ND). In this case the OG Status will be “CA” and the Permit Status will be “C”. The operstatus

field has a value if there is a corresponding record in th e uic_wells table. Operstatus fields will contain the

following values

– (PA, AC, TM, PD).

PA

– plugged and abandoned

AC

– active injection well

TM

– injection is terminated

PD

– injection permit form 1015 is pending approval
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-4222

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

ALBERT EUGENE HARDY, JR., 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, 

District Judge. (1:07-cr-00010-LHT-1) 

Submitted: November 6, 2009 Decided: November 19, 2009 

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Reita P. Pendry, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. 

Edward R. Ryan, United States Attorney, Charlotte, North 

Carolina; Amy E. Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, 

Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
PER CURIAM: 

 Albert Eugene Hardy, Jr., appeals from his 168-month 

sentence, entered pursuant to his guilty plea to conspiracy to 

possess with intent to distribute crack cocaine. On appeal, he 

asserts that the district court erred in failing to provide 

individualized reasoning for the chosen sentence, as required by 

United States v. Carter, 564 F.3d 325 (4th Cir. 2009). The 

Government has raised Hardy’s appellate waiver contained in his 

plea agreement. Finding that Hardy has waived consideration of 

the claim on appeal, we dismiss. 

 A defendant may, in a valid plea agreement, waive the 

right to appeal under 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (2006). See United 

States v. Wiggins, 905 F.2d 51, 53 (4th Cir. 1990). We review 

the validity of an appellate waiver de novo and will uphold a 

waiver of appellate rights if the waiver is valid and the issue 

being appealed is covered by the waiver. See United States v. 

Blick, 408 F.3d 162, 168 (4th Cir. 2005). An appellate waiver 

is generally considered to be knowing and voluntary if the 

district court specifically questioned the defendant concerning 

the waiver provision during the Rule 11 colloquy and the record 

indicates that the defendant understood the full significance of 

the waiver and was not denied effective assistance of counsel. 

See United States v. Johnson, 410 F.3d 137, 151 (4th Cir. 2005). 

 

2 
3 

 During Hardy’s Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 hearing, the 

district court specifically questioned Hardy about the appellate 

waiver and, after doing so, found that Hardy voluntarily and 

intelligently entered his plea. The record reveals nothing to 

suggest that the district court’s finding was erroneous, and 

Hardy raises no claim to the contrary. Accordingly, the 

appellate waiver contained in Hardy’s plea agreement is valid 

and enforceable. Moreover, Hardy’s sole contention on appeal--

that the district court erred in failing to properly explain the 

basis for his sentence--is foreclosed by his appellate waiver. 

 Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Editorial Note on Part 922
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

§ 922.140 Boundary. ( a ) The Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary (Sanctuary) consists of an area of approximately 639 square nautical miles (nmi2) (846 sq. mi.) of Federal marine waters and the submerged lands thereunder, over and around Stellwagen Bank and other submerged features off the coast of Massachusetts. The boundary encompasses the entirety of Stellwagen Bank; Tillies Bank, to the northeast of Stellwagen Bank; and portions of Jeffreys Ledge, to the north of Stellwagen Bank.
( b ) The Sanctuary boundary is identified by the following coordinates, indicating the most northeast, southeast, southwest, west-northwest, and north-northwest points: 42.76672 −70.21664 (NE); 42.09330 −70.03506 (SE); 42.12924 −70.47043 (SW); 42.54830 −70.59737 (WNW); and 42.65123 −70.50262 (NNW). The western border is formed by a straight line connecting the most southwest and the west-northwest points of the Sanctuary. At the most west-northwest point, the Sanctuary border follows a line contiguous with the three-mile jurisdictional boundary of Massachusetts to the most north-northwest point. From this point, the northern border is formed by a straight line connecting the most north-northwest point and the most northeast point. The eastern border is formed by a straight line connecting the most northeast and the most southeast points of the Sanctuary. The southern border follows a straight line between the most southwest point and a point located at 42.11526 −70.27800. From that point, the southern border then continues in a west-to-east direction along a line contiguous with the three-mile jurisdictional boundary of Massachusetts until reaching the most southeast point of the Sanctuary. The boundary coordinates are listed in appendix A to this subpart.
[60 FR 66877, Dec. 27, 1995, as amended at 88 FR 968, Jan. 6, 2023]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Michael Gaughan, Appellant.

Present — Poster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ.
§ 30.72 Civil penalty procedures. ( a ) *General.* Whenever a civil penalty is sought for a violation of this part, the charged party is entitled to receive a formal complaint specifying the charges and, at his or her request, to contest the charges in a hearing before an administrative law judge. Any such hearing shall be conducted in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 556 and 557.
( b ) *Applicable law for delegated function.* If, pursuant to 13 U.S.C. 306, the Secretary delegates functions addressed in this part to another agency, the provisions of law of that agency relating to penalty assessment, remission or mitigation of such penalties, collection of such penalties, and limitations of action and compromise of claims shall apply.
( c ) *Commencement of civil actions.* If any person fails to pay a civil penalty imposed under this subpart, the Secretary may request the Attorney General to commence a civil action in an appropriate district court of the United States to recover the amount imposed (plus interest at currently prevailing rates from the date of the final order). No such action may be commenced more than five years after the date the order imposing the civil penalty becomes final. In such action, the validity, amount, and appropriateness of such penalty shall not be subject to review.
( d ) *Remission and mitigation.* Any penalties imposed under § 30.71(b)(1) and (b)(2) may be remitted or mitigated, if: ( 1 ) The penalties were incurred without willful negligence or fraud; or
( 2 ) Other circumstances exist that justify a remission or mitigation.
( e ) *Deposit of payments in General Fund of the Treasury.* Any amount paid in satisfaction of a civil penalty imposed under this subpart shall be deposited into the general fund of the Treasury and credited as miscellaneous receipts, other than a payment to remit a forfeiture which shall be deposited into the Treasury Forfeiture fund.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-13-0124 - Policy Options for Merchant (Non-Electric Utility) Plant Financial Qualifications

Accession Number: ML13093A158

Date Released: Thursday, December 12, 2013

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML13057A006 - SECY-13-0124 - Policy Options For Merchant (Non-Electric Utility) Plant Financial Qualifications (W/ENCLOSURES 2, 3 AND 4) (24 page(s), 11/22/2013)
    - ML003752225 - STAFF REQUIREMENTS - SECY-97-253 - POLICY OPTIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR FINANCIAL QUALIFICATIONS IN RESPONSE TO RESTRUCTURING OF THE ELECTRIC UTILITY INDUSTRY (2 page(s), 1/15/1998)
    - ML12264A790 - SECY-98-153 Update of Issues Related to Nuclear Power Reactor Financial Qualifications in Response to Restructuring of the  Electric Utility Industry (42 page(s), 6/29/1998)
    - ML023600088 - SECY-02-0180 - "Legal & Financial Policy Issues Associated with Licensing New Nuclear Power Plants." (26 page(s), 10/7/2002)
    - ML030900371 - SRM-SECY-02-0180 - "Legal and Financial Policy Issues Associated With Licensing New Nuclear Power Plants." (1 page(s), 3/31/2003)
    - ML12334A187 - LTR-12-0675 Letter from Ellen Ginsberg to Chairman Macfarlane re Request for Commission Guidance to Clarify Application of Financial Qualifications Requirements in the Context of New Nuclear Plant Developed by Merchant Generators re South Texas COL (17 page(s), 11/13/2012)
    - ML12291A816 - Transcripts of 10/11/12 Public Meeting - Financial Qualifications for Merchant Plant COL Applicants .docx (122 page(s), 10/11/2012)
    - ML13022A446 - Transcript of Public Meeting on Financial Qualifications for Merchant Plant Combined License Applicants, January 8, 2013, Pages 1-171. (174 page(s), 1/8/2013)
    - ML13217A070 - SECY-13-0124 - Enclosure 1 - Non-Concurrence Process(NCP-2013) for subject document Policy Options for Merchant Plant Financial Qualifitcations (ML13057A006) (24 page(s), 11/22/2013)
    - ML12263A738 - SECY-97-253 - Policy Options for Nuclear Power Reactor Financial Qualifications in Response to Restructuring of the Electric Utility Industry (32 page(s), 10/24/1997)
    - ML12236A723 - SECY-79-299 - Generic Issue of Financial Qualifications: Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities (97 page(s), 4/27/1979)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
### [§5505. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–446, title XII, §1201(g)(4)(A), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4687]

Section, added Pub. L. 101–508, title VIII, §8001(a)(1), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–341, §3205; renumbered §5505, Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §402(b)(1), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 238, related to limitation on compensation payments for certain incompetent veterans.