alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 223 (Friday, November 19, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67698-67699]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25683]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Alabama, Arkansas, 
Louisiana and Mississippi Advisory Committees

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a conference 
call of the Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana and Mississippi Advisory 
Committees will convene at 1:30 p.m. and adjourn at 3:30 p.m. on 
Wednesday, December 15, 2004. The purpose of the conference call is to 
plan for future activities in 2005.
    This conference call is available to the public through the 
following call-in number: 1-800-659-8290, access code 29789882. Any 
interested member of the public may call this number and listen to the 
meeting. Callers can expect to incur charges for calls not initiated 
using the supplied call-in number or over wireless lines and the 
Commission will not refund any incurred charges. Callers will incur no 
charge for calls using the call-in number over land-line connections. 
Persons with hearing impairments may also follow the proceedings by 
first calling the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-977-8339 and providing 
the Service with the conference call number.
    To ensure that the Commission secures an appropriate number of 
lines for the public, persons are asked to register by contacting Jo 
Ann Daniels of

[[Page 67699]]

the Central Regional Office, 913-551-1400 and TDD number 913-551-1414, 
by 3 p.m. on Thursday, December 9, 2004. The meeting will be conducted 
pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the 
Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, November 8, 2004.
Ivy L. Davis,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 04-25683 Filed 11-18-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
T he Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western 1 District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-3957

___________ RTC Mortgage Trust 1994-N2, a * Delaware Business Trust, * * Appellee * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Myron W. Haith; Richard Brock; * Stuart Kahn, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellants, * * Joseph Haith, * * Garnishee. *

___________ Submitted: December 8, 1998 Filed: December 31, 1998

___________ Before HANSEN, ROSS and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. MyronHaith, Richard Brock, and Stuart Kahn appeal from the district court’s 1 denial of their Federal Rule of Civil Pro cedure 60(b) motion. After carefully reviewing-2-

the record and the parties’ submission s, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-13-0036 - Annual Report to the Commission on Licensee Performance in the Materials and Waste Programs for Fiscal Year 2012

Accession Number: ML13070A167

Date Released: Friday, April 19, 2013

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML13070A205 - SECY-13-0036 - Annual Report to the Commission on Licensee Performance in the Materials and Waste Programs for Fiscal Year 2012 (6 page(s), 4/5/2013)
    - ML13070A277 - SECY-13-0036 - Enclosure 1:  Nuclear Material Events Database Annual Report Fiscal Year 2012 (86 page(s), 4/5/2013)
    - ML13070A279 - SECY-13-0036 - Enclosure 2:  Summary of Severity Level I and II Enforcement Actions for Calendar Year 2012 (1 page(s), 4/5/2013)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 17, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67361-67362]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25468]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Citizenship and Immigration Services Bureau

[CIS No. 2331-04]
RIN 1615-ZA68

Extension of Honduras for Temporary Protected Status; Correction

AGENCY: Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is 
correcting a notice that was published in the Federal Register on 
November 3, 2004 at 69 FR 64084 which announced the extension of the 
designation of Honduras for Temporary Protected Status (TPS). In the 
supplemental information to the notice, USCIS inadvertently misstated 
that only Form I-821 with Revision Date 7/30/04 will

[[Page 67362]]

be accepted. However, the Form I-821 Instructions were revised on 
November 5, 2004 and are now consistent with the filing instructions in 
the aforementioned Federal Register notice. Therefore, USCIS is 
notifying affected nationals of Honduras (or aliens with no nationality 
who last habitually resided in Honduras) that Form I-821 with Revision 
Date 11/05/04 will be accepted until further notice, and Form I-821 
with Revision Date 7/30/04 will be accepted through January 3, 2005. 
All applicants are required to follow the same filing requirements as 
listed in the notice at 69 FR 64084 regardless of the version of the 
Form I-821 submitted.

DATES: This correction is effective November 17, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Colleen Cook, Residence and Status 
Services, Office of Programs and Regulations Development, U.S. 
Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security, 
111 Massachusetts Ave., NW., 3rd floor, Washington, DC 20529, telephone 
(202) 514-4754.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Need for Correction

    As published in the Federal Register on November 3, 2004 (69 FR 
64084), the notice contains an error that is in need of correction.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication on November 3, 2004 (69 FR 64084), of 
the notice that was the subject of FR Doc. 04-24608 is corrected as 
follows:
    1. On page 64086, beginning on the 8th line in the first column, 
the sentences ``Please note that Form I-821 has been revised and only 
the new form with Revision Date 7/30/04 will be accepted. Submissions 
of older versions of Form I-821 will be rejected.'' is corrected to 
read: ``Please note that Form I-821 has been revised and the new form 
with Revision Date 11/05/04 will be accepted until further notice. The 
previous version of Form I-821 with Revision Date 7/30/04 will be 
accepted through January 3, 2005.''

    Dated: November 12, 2004.
Richard A. Sloan,
Director, Regulatory Management Division, U.S. Citizenship and 
Immigration Services.
[FR Doc. 04-25468 Filed 11-16-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-10-P
```
§ 919.800 What are the causes for debarment? We may debar a person for— ( a ) Conviction of or civil judgment for— ( 1 ) Commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public or private agreement or transaction;
( 2 ) Violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes, including those proscribing price fixing between competitors, allocation of customers between competitors, and bid rigging;
( 3 ) Commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, tax evasion, receiving stolen property, making false claims, or obstruction of justice; or
( 4 ) Commission of any other offense indicating a lack of business integrity or business honesty that seriously and directly affects your present responsibility;
( b ) Violation of the terms of a public agreement or transaction so serious as to affect the integrity of an agency program, such as— ( 1 ) A willful failure to perform in accordance with the terms of one or more public agreements or transactions;
( 2 ) A history of failure to perform or of unsatisfactory performance of one or more public agreements or transactions; or
( 3 ) A willful violation of a statutory or regulatory provision or requirement applicable to a public agreement or transaction;
( c ) Any of the following causes: ( 1 ) A nonprocurement debarment by any Federal agency taken before October 1, 1988, or a procurement debarment by any Federal agency taken pursuant to 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, before August 25, 1995;
( 2 ) Knowingly doing business with an ineligible person, except as permitted under § 919.120;
( 3 ) Failure to pay a single substantial debt, or a number of outstanding debts (including disallowed costs and overpayments, but not including sums owed the Federal Government under the Internal Revenue Code) owed to any Federal agency or instrumentality, provided the debt is uncontested by the debtor or, if contested, provided that the debtor's legal and administrative remedies have been exhausted;
( 4 ) Violation of a material provision of a voluntary exclusion agreement entered into under § 919.640 or of any settlement of a debarment or suspension action; or
( 5 ) Violation of the provisions of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (41 U.S.C. 701); or
( d ) Any other cause of so serious or compelling a nature that it affects your present responsibility.
### Notes from Meeting with **Environmental Technology Council**

**Attended by:** ETC Staff

: David Case , James Williams ETC Members: Scott Kuhn (Clean Harbors), Bob Garn er (Veolia), Tom Baker (Veolia),

Carrie Berringer (Heritage) and others EPA Staff: Kristin Fitzgerald , Jessica Young, Lisa Lauer Date: January 26 , 2011

EPA m et with representative s and members of Environmental Technology Council (ETC). ETC discussed EPA’s Universal Waste proposal saying that pharmaceuticals are not like oth er universal wa stes. That is, because the pharmaceuticals have street value, they need more securit y than other universal wastes. ETC also mentioned that LDR treatment standards are not uniform for hazardous waste pharmaceuticals. And they indicated that only

6 or 7 hazardous waste incinerators can take DEA controlled substances.
### §132. Competitive procedures

In division B, the term "competitive procedures" means procedures under which an agency enters into a contract pursuant to full and open competition.

(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3682.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 132 | 41:403(5). | Pub. L. 93–400, §4(5), formerly §4(6), as added Pub. L. 98–369, title VII, §2731(3), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 1195; redesignated as §4(5), Pub. L. 100–679, §3(c), Nov. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 4056; Pub. L. 103–355, title VIII, §8001(b)(1)–(3), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3386. |

Section
ASLB TO HEAR ORAL ARGUMENTS NOV. 5-6 ON CONTENTION 

REGARDING CRACKS IN DAVIS-BESSE SHIELD BUILDING

The Atomic Safety and Licensing Board will hear oral arguments Nov. 5-6 on a new 

contention in the Davis-Besse nuclear plant relicensing hearing. The contention alleges that 

cracks in the plant’s shield building should be considered “an aging-related feature” that would 

preclude renewing the plant’s operating license for an additional 20 years.

The contention was filed in January by four intervenors in the hearing: Beyond Nuclear, 

Citizens Environment Alliance of Southwestern Ontario, Don’t Waste Michigan, and the Green 

Party of Ohio. The oral arguments will discuss whether the Board should admit the contention.

The oral arguments were originally scheduled for May 18 but were postponed at the request of 

the intervenors.

The Board will also consider a motion by FirstEnergy, the plant’s operator, to dismiss a 

separate contention challenging inputs to the operator’s Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives 

analysis.

The oral arguments will be held in the Common Pleas Courtroom of the Lucas County 

Courthouse, 700 Adams St., in Toledo, Ohio. Argument will start at 9 a.m. and continue to 4:30 

p.m. on Nov. 5, resuming on Nov. 6 if necessary. More information about the issues to be 

discussed and the format of the oral argument can be found in a Board Order issued Sept. 20. 

Only lawyers for the intervenors, the NRC staff and FirstEnergy will be allowed to 

participate. The public and media are welcome to attend, but signs, banners, posters or other 

displays will not be permitted in the courtroom.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 12-118 October 24, 2012
### §5104C. Options following decision by agency of original jurisdiction

(a) Within One Year of Decision.—(1) Subject to paragraph (2), in any case in which the Secretary renders a decision on a claim, the claimant may take any of the following actions on or before the date that is one year after the date on which the agency of original jurisdiction issues a decision with respect to that claim:

(A) File a request for higher-level review under section 5104B of this title.

(B) File a supplemental claim under section 5108 of this title.

(C) File a notice of disagreement under section 7105 of this title.

(2)(A) Once a claimant takes an action set forth in paragraph (1), the claimant may not take another action set forth in that paragraph with respect to the same claim or same issue contained within the claim until—

(i) the higher-level review, supplemental claim, or notice of disagreement is adjudicated; or

(ii) the request for higher-level review, supplemental claim, or notice of disagreement is withdrawn.

(B) Nothing in this subsection shall prohibit a claimant from taking any of the actions set forth in paragraph (1) in succession with respect to a claim or an issue contained within the claim.

(C) Nothing in this subsection shall prohibit a claimant from taking different actions set forth in paragraph (1) with respect to different claims or different issues contained within a claim.

(D) The Secretary may, as the Secretary considers appropriate, develop and implement a policy for claimants who—

(i) take an action under paragraph (1);

(ii) wish to withdraw the action before the higher-level review, supplemental claim, or notice of disagreement is adjudicated; and

(iii) in lieu of such action take a different action under paragraph (1).

(b) More Than One Year After Decision.—In any case in which the Secretary renders a decision on a claim and more than one year has passed since the date on which the agency of original jurisdiction issues a decision with respect to that claim, the claimant may file a supplemental claim under section 5108 of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 115–55, §2(h)(1), Aug. 23, 2017, 131 Stat. 1108.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to all claims for which the Secretary of Veterans Affairs provides notice of a decision under section 5104 of this title on or after the later of 540 days after Aug. 23, 2017, or 30 days after the date on which the Secretary submits to Congress a certification of certain capabilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs to carry out the new appeals system established by Pub. L. 115–55 and to address appeals of decisions on legacy claims, with provision for early applicability of the new appeals system to certain claims, see section 2(x) of Pub. L. 115–55, set out as an Effective Date of 2017 Amendment note under section 101 of this title, and bracketed note thereunder.
No. IV-09-025 

Contact: Victor Dricks 

Phone: (817) 860-8128 

 

 June 29, 2009 

 E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

NRC NAMES NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR AT FORT CALHOUN NUCLEAR PLANT 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has assigned Jacob 

Wingebach as a resident inspector at the Fort Calhoun nuclear plant. The plant, 

operated by the Omaha Public Power District, is located about 20 miles north of 

near Omaha, Neb. 

“Jacob Wingebach’s technical and regulatory experience will assist the 

NRC in carrying out its mission of protecting people and the environment and 

ensuring the safe operation of nuclear power plants,” said NRC Region IV 

Administrator Elmo E. Collins. 

Wingebach joined the NRC as a reactor engineer in the Region III office in Lisle, Illinois, 

in 2008, where he was assigned to the Division of Reactor Projects. He graduated from the 

United States Naval Academy in 2001 with a Bachelor of Science degree in Systems Engineering 

and served as a submarine officer in the U.S. Navy. 

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two resident inspectors. They 

serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting regular inspections, monitoring 

significant work activities and interacting with plant workers and the public. Wingebach joins 

Senior Resident John Kirkland at the site. 

The Fort Calhoun resident inspectors can be reached at: (402) 426-9611. 

 ### 

 

 NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125 

Telephone: (817) 860-8128
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CFO

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Madison River Capital, LLC (the Company) for the
year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Paul H. Sunu, as Managing Director, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                 |  |                                                         
|---------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|                
|/s/ PAUL H. SUNU
|Name:            |  | Paul H. Sunu                                            
|Title:           |  | Managing Director, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
|Date:            |  | March 31, 2006                                          

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
No. IV-12-044

Contact: Victor Dricks (817) 200-1128

 Lara Uselding (817) 200-1519

 

October 15, 2012 

E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

NRC ISSUES $3,500 FINE AND CONFIRMATORY ORDER TO DBI, INC.

DBI, Inc. of Casper, Wyo., has agreed to make changes to its training program and pay a 

$3,500 fine as part of an agreement with the NRC. The company uses radiography cameras at its 

jobsite in Casper and at temporary jobsites to find structural defects in welds.

Between July 1, 2011, and July 17, 2012, the NRC conducted an inspection of the 

company’s facility and identified four apparent violations of NRC regulations. These include 

failure to conduct a survey when approaching a radiography camera; having at least one qualified 

individual present during radiography operations; supervising an assistant radiographer and 

providing complete and accurate information to the NRC. Three of these apparent violations 

involve willful misconduct by DBI.

The apparent violations were documented in an NRC inspection report issued on Aug. 8. 

The company chose to resolve the matter using the agency’s alternative dispute resolution 

process in which a neutral mediator assists parties in reaching an agreement.

As a result, the company has agreed to pay a $3,500 civil penalty, establish a 

comprehensive training program using an outside consultant designed to deter future willful 

violations of NRC regulations, conduct unannounced field audits, and implement a testing 

program to verify the effectiveness of corrective actions to its training programs for current and 

new employees.

Copies of the Order will be posted to the NRC’s web site.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV

 1600 E. Lamar Blvd.

 Arlington, TX 76011 - 4125

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov