alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|         |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| • | the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|         |                                                                                                                                                      |
|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| • | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |
| Dated: | July 31, 2012 | By   | /s/ Thomas F. Motamed   |
|   |   |   | Thomas F. Motamed  |
|   |   |   | Chief Executive Officer  |
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 36

 37

 38

 39 ★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲ ▲

▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

05/30

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 30 May 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL
Issue Date: 01/15/09 -1- 09-002 

NRC INSPECTION MANUAL DIRS

Change Notice 09-002 

 

 DELETED: TRANSMITTED: 

 Number Date Number Date

1. IP 95003 10/26/06 IP 95003 01/15/09 

2. IP 95003.01 01/17/02 P 95003.01 01/15/09 

3. ________ ________ IP 95003.02 01/15/09 

4. IMC 2610 01/09/86 ________ ________ 

5. IMC 2603 01/16/96 ________ ________ 

6. IP 88056 01/16/96 ________ ________ 

7. IP 88057 01/16/96 ________ ________ 

8. IP 88058 01/16/96 ________ ________ 

9. IP 88059 01/16/96 ________ ________ 

10. IP 88060 01/16/96 ________ ________ 

11. IP 88061 01/16/96 ________ ________ 

12. IP 88062 01/16/96 ________ ________ 

13. IP 88063 01/16/96 ________ ________ 

14. IP 88064 01/16/96 ________ ________ 

15. IP 88065 01/16/96 ________ ________ 

16. IP 88066 01/16/96 ________ ________ 

TRAINING: None 
Issue Date: 01/15/09 -2- 09-002 

REMARKS: IP 95003 (Supplemental Inspection For Repetitive Degraded 

Cornerstones, Multiple Degraded Cornerstones, Multiple Yellow Inputs or 

One Red Input) has been revised to incorporate the results of the Reactor 

Oversight Program (ROP) safety culture lessons-learned evaluation and to 

respond to ROP feedback forms. 

 IP 95003.01 (Emergency Preparedness) has been revised to so that the 

Emergency Preparedness inspection guidance in IP 95001.01 be 

considered during the performance of all 95003 inspections. 

IP 95003.02 (Guidance for Conducting an Independent NRC Safety 

Culture Assessment) is issued as a new attachment. Previously, most of 

this inspection guidance was contained within IP 95003 and its Enclosures 

A through F. IP 95003.02 includes guidance on performing a graded 

evaluation of a licensee’s third party safety culture assessment, including 

performing an evaluation of the third-party assessment methodology and 

tools. 

IMC 2610 (Resident Inspection Program at Nuclear Fuel Services Plant 

Erwin, Tennessee) has been deleted because it has been superseded by 

IP 88135, “Resident Inspection Program for Category I Fuel Cycle 

Facilities”. 

The following inspection manual documents, related to the chemical safety 

program, have been deleted. They were superseded by issuance of IMC 

2600, “Fuel Cycle Facility Operational Safety and Safeguards Inspection 

Program,” and its related elements in 2006: 

IMC 2603 (Inspection of the Nuclear Chemical Process Safety Program at 

Fuel Cycle Facilities) 

IP 88056 (Process Safety Information) 

IP 88057 (Hazard Identification and Assessment) 

IP 88058 (Standard Operating Procedures) 

IP 88059 (Site-Wide Safety Procedures) 

IP 88060 (Detection and Monitoring) 

IP 88061 (Chemical Safety Training) 

IP 88062 (Maintenance and Inspection) 

IP 88063 (Management of Change) 

IP 88064 (Emergency Response Procedures) 

IP 88065 (Incident Investigation) 

IP 88066 (Audits and Inspection) 

DISTRIBUTION: Standard 

 

END
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# September 2011 Report on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of The Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206.

Accession Number: ML112780188

Date Released: Monday, October 17, 2011

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML112690061 - Cover Letter: September 2011 10 CFR 2.206 Monthly Status Report. (3 page(s), 10/11/2011)
    - ML112690064 - Enclosures: September 2011 10 CFR 2.206 Monthly Status Report (23 page(s), 10/11/2011)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
March 18, 2013

***FOR THE RECORD***

PRESSURIZED THERMAL SHOCK AND PALISADES

On March 7, the NRC issued a press release announcing a March 19 webinar to discuss 

the concept of pressurized thermal shock and what it means for the Palisades nuclear plant 

located in Michigan. Subsequent media generated some confusion about the implications of this 

issue for the plant. 

Pressurized thermal shock could occur if a rare accident results in a large amount of cold 

water rapidly cooling the metal vessel holding the reactor core. This rapid cooling increases the 

stresses on the vessel and could challenge the vessel’s integrity. 

Some media reports implied the plant is in danger of shutting down permanently and that 

the issue is something new, representing immediate danger to the plant.

In fact, extensive research by the NRC, independent laboratories and industry experts has 

shown the issue is not a current safety concern and does not require any current repairs; it is a 

regulatory issue. The NRC has required Palisades, and all other plants with pressurized water 

reactors, to evaluate and track this issue for decades, to make sure they meet NRC requirements.

Palisades is operating safely and its reactor vessel conforms to the NRC’s safety requirements. 

This is not a new issue. Entergy is aware the NRC requires the plant to demonstrate that 

the reactor vessel will continue to operate safely beyond 2017, when the plant will reach a 

regulatory limit established to ensure the vessel will remain safe even in an extreme accident 

situation. 

We are holding the webinar to address concerns and misconceptions about the 

implications of this issue for Palisades. At that time, we will also communicate to the public how 

the agency will continue to make sure the reactor vessel remains safe going forward.

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001
Seedskadee NationalWildlife Refuge Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan - September 2001 5
Seedskadee NationalWildlife Refuge Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan - September 2001 27
Seedskadee NationalWildlif
Seedskadee NationalWildlife 
Seedskadee NationalWildlife 
Seedskadee NationalWildlif

Special Fishing Zone extends tothe County Road 8 Bridge (CCC)
Seedskadee NationalWildlif
Seedskadee NationalWildlif

8
Seedskadee NationalWildlife 

8
Seedskadee NationalWildlife 
Seedskadee NationalWildlif
Seedskadee NationalWildlife
### §15505. Local development districts and organizations

(a) Grants to Local Development Districts.—Subject to the requirements of this section, a Commission may make grants to a local development district to assist in the payment of development planning and administrative expenses.

(b) Conditions for Grants.—

(1) Maximum amount.—The amount of a grant awarded under this section may not exceed 80 percent of the administrative and planning expenses of the local development district receiving the grant.

(2) Maximum period for state agencies.—In the case of a State agency certified as a local development district, a grant may not be awarded to the agency under this section for more than 3 fiscal years.

(3) Local share.—The contributions of a local development district for administrative expenses may be in cash or in kind, fairly evaluated, including space, equipment, and services.

(c) Duties of Local Development Districts.—A local development district shall—

(1) operate as a lead organization serving multicounty areas in the region at the local level;

(2) assist the Commission in carrying out outreach activities for local governments, community development groups, the business community, and the public;

(3) serve as a liaison between State and local governments, nonprofit organizations (including community-based groups and educational institutions), the business community, and citizens; and

(4) assist the individuals and entities described in paragraph (3) in identifying, assessing, and facilitating projects and programs to promote the economic development of the region.

(Added Pub. L. 110–234, title XIV, §14217(a)(2), May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1477, and Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title XIV, §14217(a)(2), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 2239.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 enacted identical sections. Pub. L. 110–234 was repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the first day of the first fiscal year beginning after June 18, 2008, see section 14217(d) of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as a note under section 15101 of this title.
#### BOARD OF EDUCATION OF INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. NO. 2 OF TURNER COUNTY v. TURNER COUNTY.

A county treasurer is not, under the statutes, entitled to 4 per cent commission for the collection of school taxes.

(Opinion filed, June 27, 1910.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Turner County. Hon. E. G. Smith, Judge.

Action by the Board of Education of Independent School District No. 2 of Turner County, S. D., against Turner County. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

Remanded with directions.

*L. L. Fleeger,*for appellant. *Alan Bogue, Jr.,*for respondent.

WHITING, P. J.

This case is in all respects similar to the case of City of Centerville v. Turner County, 23 S. D. 424, 122 N. W. 350, 25 S. D. 300, 126 N. W. 605, with the exception that in this case it was the school tax which had been collected by the county treasurer and 4 per cent, thereof retained as commission.

The appellant urges that, even if the treasurer was unjustified under the statute in retaining the 4 per cent, commission in the collection of city taxes, yet he was entitled to retain such commission from school taxes. We can find nothing to justify such distinction, and it seems clear that this case is controlled in all things by the opinion in the Centerville Case.

It is therefore the opinion of this court that this cause should be remanded to the circuit court, and such court directed to ascertain the amount of taxes wrongfully withheld during the six years prior to the commencement of this action, and award judgment for the same with interest and costs. As so modified, the said judgment is affirmed, appellant being awarded costs on this appeal.

HANEY, J., dissenting. SMITH, J., taking no part in this decision.
### §6713. Certification of new construction

New construction (including substantial remodeling, conversion, rebuilding, enlargement, extension, or major structural improvement of existing building, but not including ordinary maintenance or remodeling or changes necessary to continue occupancy) shall not be authorized or conducted within the development area except on prior certification by the Administrator of General Services that the construction is, or may reasonably be expected to be, consistent with the carrying out of the development plan described in section 5(a) of the Pennsylvania Avenue Development Corporation Act of 1972 (Public Law 92–578, 86 Stat. 1269).

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1197.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6713 | 40:876(b). | Pub. L. 92–578, §7(b), Oct. 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1273; Pub. L. 93–427, §2, Oct. 1, 1974, 88 Stat. 1170. |

Section

The words "After October 1, 1974" and the text of 40:876(b) (proviso) are omitted as obsolete.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 5(a) of the Pennsylvania Avenue Development Corporation Act of 1972, referred to in text, was classified to section 874(a) of former Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 107–217, §6(b), Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1304.
### SUBCHAPTER II—CHIEF ACQUISITION OFFICERS COUNCIL
**EXHIBIT 32.2
**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

          Inconnection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year endedJune 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the“Report”) by Gold Horse International, Inc. (the “Registrant”), I, AdamWasserman, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that: 

 

 

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 

 

 

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of Registrant. 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Adam Wasserman

 
  
 

Adam Wasserman

 

 

 

Title: Chief Financial Officer, principal financial and accounting officer

Dated:October 1, 2010 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has beenprovided to the Registrant and will be retained by the company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**
exv4w1



 





Exhibit 4.1




     


	CERTIFICATE OF MEMBERSHIP UNITS




	Membership
Number            Units




	NATURAL INNOVATIVE RENEWABLE ENERGY, LLC
A Limited Liability Company
Organized Under the Laws of the State of Iowa




	THIS CERTIFIES THAT     is/are the




	owner(s) of    UNITS (   ) of the Membership Units of Natural
Innovative Renewable Energy, LLC, an Iowa limited liability company (the “Company). Changes
in the actual Membership Units held by the Members are reflected in the Certificate of
Registration of the Company.




	The Membership Units represented by this Certificate may not be transferred or assigned except
in compliance with the Operating Agreement of the Company, a copy of which is available at the
principal office of the Company.




	IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly
authorized President and Secretary as of this   day of 
, 20 .




	John Lucken, Chairman Steve Rowe, Secretary





 









 




,                      hereby sell, assign, and transfer unto                                     
                        
Units represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint                     
Attorney to transfer the said Units on the books of the within named Company with full power
of substitution in the premises.




     Dated                                         ,                     .



In Presence of




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 


	 	 	 	 

	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 

	 	 







THE TRANSFERABILITY OF THE MEMBERSHIP UNITS REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE IS
RESTRICTED. SUCH UNITS MAY NOT BE SOLD, ASSIGNED, OR TRANSFERRED, AND NO ASSIGNEE,
VENDEE, TRANSFEREE OR ENDORSEE THEREOF WILL BE RECOGNIZED AS HAVING ACQUIRED ANY
SUCH UNITS FOR ANY PURPOSES, UNLESS AND TO THE EXTENT SUCH SALE, TRANSFER,
HYPOTHECATION, OR ASSIGNMENT IS PERMITTED BY, AND IS COMPLETED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE
WITH, APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND STATE LAW AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THE
OPERATING AGREEMENT OF THE COMPANY, AS AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME.




THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE MAY NOT BE SOLD, OFFERED FOR SALE OR
TRANSFERRED IN THE ABSENCE OF AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF
1933, AS AMENDED, AND UNDER APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS, OR AN OPINION OF
COUNSEL SATISFACTORY TO THE COMPANY THAT SUCH TRANSACTION IS EXEMPT FROM
REGISTRATION UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, AND UNDER APPLICABLE
STATE SECURITIES LAWS.
### §6902. Assignment of right, title, and interest in the Union Station complex to the Secretary of Transportation

The Secretary of Transportation has the right, title, and interest in and to the Union Station complex, including all agreements and leases made under sections 101–110 of the National Visitors Center Facilities Act of 1968 (Public Law 90–264, 82 Stat. 43). To the extent the Secretary of Transportation and the Secretary of the Interior agree, the Secretary of the Interior may lease space for visitor services.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1201.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6902 | 40:811(a) (1st, 2d sentences). | Pub. L. 90–264, title I, §111(a) (1st, 2d sentences), as added Pub. L. 97–125, §3(3), Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1668. |

Section

This section is substituted for the text of 40:811(a) (1st, 2d sentences) to eliminate obsolete words.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Sections 101–110 of the National Visitors Center Facilities Act of 1968, referred to in text, are sections 101 to 110 of Pub. L. 90–264, title I, Mar. 12, 1968, 82 Stat. 43–45, which were classified principally to part A (§801 et seq.) of subchapter I of chapter 18 of former Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 107–217, §6(b), Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1304. Section 104 of the Act was classified as a note under section 804 of former Title 40 prior to repeal by Pub. L. 107–217. Section 108 of the Act was not classified to the Code.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2576

To amend the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act of 1940 to enhance 

the protection of credit ratings of active duty military personnel who 

are activated for military service. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 24, 2003

Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. EVANS, Mr. WELDON of Pennsylvania, Mr. PLATTS, Mr. FATTAH, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mr. LARSON of 

Connecticut, Mr. CAPUANO, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. ISRAEL, Mr. MARKEY, 

Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. HOEFFEL, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. FILNER, 

Mr. ACEVEDO-VILA ́, Mr. FROST, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of 

California, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, Mrs. DAVIS of California, 

Mrs. TAUSCHER, Mr. MEEHAN, Mr. HILL, Mr. JEFFERSON, Mr. KANJORSKI, Mr. MURTHA, Mr. DOYLE, Mr. HOLDEN, Mr. RYAN of Ohio, and 

Mr. WU) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL

To amend the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act of 1940 

to enhance the protection of credit ratings of active duty 

military personnel who are activated for military service.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Heroes Credit 

5 Protection Act’’. 
2

•HR 2576 IH 

1 SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF CREDIT RATINGS OF PERSONS AC2 TIVATED FOR MILITARY SERVICE. 

3 (a) CREDIT RATING PROTECTION.—The Soldiers’ 

4 and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act of 1940 (50 U.S.C. App. 501 

5 et seq.) is amended by inserting at the end of article I 

6 the following new section: 

7 ‘‘SEC. 109. (a) Any person or entity engaged in the 

8 practice of assembling or evaluating consumer credit infor9 mation that receives from a creditor a negative report of 

10 nonpayment or late payment with respect to a qualifying 

11 account of a person in military service shall enter with 

12 that negative report a notation that the account is delin13 quent or paid slowly due to military service. 

14 ‘‘(b) Any future potential creditor of such person who 

15 receives a credit report that includes a notation required 

16 by subsection (a) shall disregard any negative information 

17 so noted in the credit report. 

18 ‘‘(c) For purposes of this section, a qualifying ac19 count is an account that was opened by a person in mili20 tary service before the date on which that person entered 

21 that period of military service, but only with respect to 

22 obligations incurred before such date.’’. 

23 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Section 109 of the Soldiers’ 

24 and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act of 1940, as added by sub25 section (a), shall apply with respect to a period of military 

26 service (as defined in such Act) that is being performed 
3

•HR 2576 IH 

1 by a person on the date of the enactment of this Act or 

2 to which a person is ordered on or after such date.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 33 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 33

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Securities Act of 1933 to specify when certain securities 
    issued in connection with church plans are treated as exempted 
                  securities for purposes of that Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Church Plan Investment Clarification 
Act''.

SEC. 2. SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 AMENDMENT.

    Section 3(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77c(a)(2)) 
is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(other than a retirement income account 
        described in section 403(b)(9) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
        1986, to the extent that the interest or participation in such 
        single trust fund or collective trust fund is issued to a 
        church, a convention or association of churches, or an 
        organization described in section 414(e)(3)(A) of such Code 
        establishing or maintaining the retirement income account or to 
        a trust established by any such entity in connection with the 
        retirement income account)'' after ``403(b) of such Code''; and
            (2) by inserting ``(other than a person participating in a 
        church plan who is described in section 414(e)(3)(B) of the 
        Internal Revenue Code of 1986)'' after ``section 401(c)(1) of 
        such Code''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 18, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                H. R. 33

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the Securities Act of 1933 to specify when certain securities 
    issued in connection with church plans are treated as exempted 
                  securities for purposes of that Act.
```