alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 743.5 Prior notifications to Congress of Exports of “600 Series Major Defense Equipment.” ( a ) *General requirement.* Applications to export items on the Commerce Control List that are “600 Series Major Defense Equipment” will be notified to Congress as provided in this section before licenses for such items are issued. ( 1 ) Exports of “600 Series Major Defense Equipment” to U.S. Government end users under License Exception GOV (§ 740.11(b) of the EAR) do not require such notification.
( 2 ) Exports of “600 Series Major Defense Equipment” that have been or will be described in a notification filed by the U.S. State Department under the Arms Export Control Act do not require such notification by BIS.
( b ) BIS will notify Congress prior to issuing a license authorizing the export of items to a country *outside* the countries listed in Country Group A:5 (see supplement no. 1 to part 740 of the EAR) that are sold under a contract that includes $14,000,000 or more of “600 Series Major Defense Equipment.”
( c ) BIS will notify Congress prior to issuing a license authorizing the export of items to a country listed in Country Group A:5 (see supplement no. 1 to part 740 of the EAR) that are sold under a contract that includes $25,000,000 or more of “600 Series Major Defense Equipment.”
( d ) In addition to information required on the application, the exporter must include a copy of the signed contract (including a statement of the value of the “600 Series Major Defense Equipment” items to be exported under the contract) for any proposed export described in paragraphs (b) or (c) of this section.
( e ) *Address.* Munitions Control Division at *mcd_compliance@bis.doc.gov*.
[78 FR 22722, Apr. 16, 2013, as amended at 87 FR 32987, June 1, 2022]
### §456. Confidentiality

(a) Counseling.—All counseling under section 452 shall be strictly confidential, except that, with the consent of the covered employee, the employing office may be notified.

(b) Mediation.—All mediation under section 452 shall be strictly confidential.

(Added Pub. L. 104–331, §2(a), Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4068.)
<PAGE>

                                                                    Page 9 of 19

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(a)

                        KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 1999-A

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE


Bank One, National Association              Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas
fka, The First National Bank of Chicago     fka,  Bankers Trust Company
One Bank One Plaza, Suite 0126              280 Park Avenue 9th Floor
Chicago, IL 60670                           New York, NY 10017
Attn: Corporate Trust Administration        Attn: Corporate Trust & Agency Group
Phone: (312) 407-0192                       Structured Finance
Fax:   (312) 407-1708                       Phone: (212) 454-4298
                                            Fax:   (212) 454-2331

Key Bank USA, National Association
800 Superior Ave, 4th Floor
Cleveland, OH 44114
ATTN: Senior Vice President
Key Education Resources
Phone: (216) 828-9342
Fax:   (216) 828-9301


Pursuant to Section 4.09 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement among Key Bank USA,
National Association, as Seller and Administrator, KeyCorp Student Loan Trust
1999-A and The First National Bank of Chicago (nka, Bank One, National
Association), as Eligible Lender Trustee, dated as of January 1, 1999 (the
"Agreement"), the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) a review of the
activities of PHEAA as Servicer from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2002,
and of its performance under the Agreement has been made, and (ii) to the best
of the undersigned's knowledge, based on the review, PHEAA as Servicer has
fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period.

The undersigned also hereby certifies that PHEAA has disclosed to the
Administrator and to the Trust's certified public accountants all significant
deficiencies relating to PHEAA's compliance with the minimum servicing standards
in accordance with a review conducted in compliance with the Uniform Single
Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar standard as set forth in the
Agreement.


                                                   PENNSYLVANIA HIGHER EDUCATION
                                                   ASSISTANCE AGENCY, Servicer



Date: March 14, 2003                               By: /S/ RICHARD E. WILLEY
                                                     -------------------------
                                                   Name: Richard E. Willey
                                                   Title: President and CEO
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William B. Buczynski, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Memorandum: On this record we regard the sentence of imprisonment for six months, in addition to the fine, •imposed, as unduly rigorous. We think the modification of the sentence of *624imprisonment to thirty days together with the $500 fine is sufficient punishment. All concur. (Appeal from a judgment which sentenced defendant to imprisonment for six months, with a fine of $500.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ.
§ 702.6 Definitions. The definitions in this section apply throughout this part. *Confidential.* A description of information that is subject to the disclosure prohibitions of the DPA (50 U.S.C. app. 2155(d)).
*Initial distribution letter.* A letter that BIS sends to a person that has been identified by the U.S. Government as a supplier or customer of materials, products or services used for activities of the industry that is the focus of a survey. The letter describes the survey's primary objectives, how survey results will assist the U.S. Government, and the confidential treatment of the information submitted. The letter also includes BIS contact information.
*Person.* The term “person” includes: ( 1 ) An individual, corporation, partnership, association, or any other organized group of persons, or legal successor or representative thereof;
( 2 ) Any State or local government or agency thereof;
( 3 ) The Government of the United States, of the District of Columbia, of any commonwealth, territory or possession of the United States, or any department, agency or commission thereof. Note to the definition of “person.”
Paragraph (1) of this definition is not limited to commercial or for-profit organizations. For example, the term “any other organized group of persons” may encompass labor unions, academic institutions, charitable organizations or any group of persons who are organized in some manner. The term corporation is not limited to publicly traded corporations or corporations that exist for the purpose of making a profit.
*Survey.* A questionnaire or other request for information that collects detailed information and data to support both the assessment of a particular industrial sector or technology and the development of a corresponding study.
Editorial Note on Part 922
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

§ 922.13 Selection of nominated areas for national marine sanctuary designation. ( a ) The Director may select a nominated area from the inventory for future consideration as a national marine sanctuary.
( b ) Selection of a nominated area from the inventory shall begin the formal sanctuary designation process. A notice of intent to prepare a draft environmental impact statement shall be published in the Federal Register and posted on the Office of National Marine Sanctuaries website. Any designation process will follow the procedures for designation and implementation set forth in section 304 of the Act.
§ 904.305 Final administrative decision. ( a ) If no request for hearing is timely filed as provided in § 904.201(a), the NOPS or NIDP becomes effective as the final administrative decision and order of NOAA 30 days after service of the NOPS or NIDP or on the last day of any delay period granted.
( b ) If a request for hearing is timely filed in accordance with § 904.201(a), the date of the final administrative decision is as provided in subpart C of this part.
§ 90.6 When a challenge may be filed. ( a ) A request for a challenge to a population estimate may be filed any time up to 90 days after the release of the estimate by the Census Bureau. Publication by the Census Bureau on its website (*www.census.gov*) shall constitute release. Documentation requesting a challenge of any estimate may also be filed any time up to 90 days after the date the Census Bureau, on its own initiative, revises that estimate.
( b ) If, however, a governmental unit has a sufficiently meritorious reason for not filing in a timely manner, the Census Bureau has the discretion to accept the late request.
### PAI-PEPO-P&RIV Support Documents Nick Parsons to: Cortney_Higgins 11/17/2011 02:00 PM Cc: Ann Johnson, Penny Lassiter, Andrea Siefers, Mike Thrift, Jan Gilbreath 

### Cortney, Attached are the technical support memos, ICR forms, and EJ and economic impacts analyses for this package. I've also attached a revised package with the most up-to-date cost numbers, as well as some typo corrections. P&RIV PCCT Impacts Assessment Memo.pdf P&RIV PCCT Impacts Assessment Memo.pdf PAI-PEPO-P&RIV Economic Impact Analysis.pdf PAI-PEPO-P&RIV Economic Impact Analysis.pdf PAI-PEPO-P&RIV Emissions Memo.pdf PAI-PEPO-P&RIV Emissions Memo.pdf PAI-PEPO-P&RIV Impacts Memo.pdf PAI-PEPO-P&RIV Impacts Memo.pdf PAI-PEPO-P&RIV MACT Allowables Memo.pdf PAI-PEPO-P&RIV MACT Allowables Memo.pdf PAI-PEPO-P&RIV Technology Review Memo.pdf PAI-PEPO-P&RIV EJ Report.docx

P&RIV ROCIS 83-I- Part II.doc P&RIV ROCIS 83-I- Part II.doc P&RIV Supporting Statement.doc P&RIV Supporting Statement.doc PAI ROCIS 83-I- Part I.doc PAI ROCIS 83-I- Part I.doc PAI ROCIS 83-I- Part II.doc PAI ROCIS 83-I- Part II.doc PAI Supporting Statement.doc PAI Supporting Statement.doc PEPO ROCIS 83-I- Part I.doc PEPO ROCIS 83-I- Part I.doc PEPO ROCIS 83-I- Part II.doc PEPO ROCIS 83-I- Part II.doc PEPO Supporting Statement.doc PEPO Supporting Statement.doc P&RIV ROCIS 83-I- Part I.doc EO12866_ChemicalRTR2060-AR02Proposal_20111117.docx
#### § 890.1201 Purpose.

This subpart sets forth the circumstances under which individuals are covered under this part in accordance with the provisions of section 599C of Public Law 101-513.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Musculoskeletal, Oral and Skin Sciences Integrated Review Group; Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Sciences Study Section.                    

*Date:*                         February 14, 2019.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Drury Inn & Suites River Walk, 201 North St. Mary's Street, San Antonio, TX 78205.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Maria Nurminskaya, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-1222,                         *nurminskayam@csr.nih.gov.*

This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical  Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 24, 2019.

Ronald J. Livingston, Jr.,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2019-00307 Filed 1-29-19; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
§ 9801.301 Requests for amendment of record. ( a ) *How addressed.* A requester seeking to amend a record or records pertaining to requester in a CIGIE system of records should submit a written request that includes the words “Privacy Act Amendment Request” on both the envelope and at the top of the request letter to the Executive Director, Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency, 1717 H Street NW., Suite 825, Washington, DC 20006. Records not subject to the Privacy Act will not be amended in accordance with these provisions.
( b ) *Contents of request.* A request to amend a record in a CIGIE system of records must include: ( 1 ) The name of the system of records and a brief description of the record proposed for amendment. In the event the request to amend the record is the result of the requester having gained access to the record in accordance with the provisions concerning access to records as set forth in subpart B of this part, copies of previous correspondence between the requester and CIGIE will serve in lieu of a separate description of the record.
( 2 ) The exact portion of the record the requester seeks to have amended should be indicated clearly. If possible, proposed alternative language should be set forth, or, at a minimum, the reasons why the requester believes the record is not accurate, relevant, timely, or complete should be set forth with enough particularity to permit CIGIE to not only understand the requester's basis for the request, but also to make an appropriate amendment to the record.
( c ) *Burden of proof.* The requester has the burden of proof when seeking the amendment of a record. The requester must furnish sufficient facts to persuade the appropriate system manager of the inaccuracy, irrelevance, untimeliness, or incompleteness of the record.
( d ) *Identification requirement.* When the requester's identity has been previously verified pursuant to § 9801.201, further verification of identity is not required as long as the communication does not suggest a need for verification. If the requester's identity has not been previously verified, the appropriate system manager may require identification validation as described in § 9801.201.
[81 FR 86563, Dec. 1, 2016, as amended at 82 FR 51334, Nov. 6, 2017]
§ 921.50 General. ( a ) To stimulate high quality research within designated National Estuarine Research Reserves, NOAA may provide financial support for research projects which are consistent with the Estuarine Research Guidelines referenced in § 921.51. Research awards may be awarded under this subpart to only those designated Reserves with approved final management plans. Although research may be conducted within the immediate watershed of the Reserve, the majority of research activities of any single research project funded under this subpart may be conducted within Reserve boundaries. Funds provided under this subpart are primarily used to support management-related research projects that will enhance scientific understanding of the Reserve ecosystem, provide information needed by Reserve management and coastal management decision-makers, and improve public awareness and understanding of estuarine ecosystems and estuarine management issues. Special research projects may be oriented to specific Reserves; however, research projects that would benefit more than one Reserve in the National Estuarine Reserve Research System are encouraged.
( b ) Funds provided under this subpart are available on a competitive basis to any coastal state or qualified public or private person. A notice of available funds will be published in the Federal Register. Special research project funds are provided in addition to any other funds available to a coastal state under the Act. Federal funds provided under this subpart may not exceed 70 percent of the total cost of the project, consistent with § 921.81(e)(4) (“allowable costs”), except when the financial assistance is provided from amounts recovered as a result of damage to natural resources located in the coastal zone, in which case the assistance may be used to pay 100 percent of the costs.
[58 FR 38215, July 15, 1993, as amended at 62 FR 12541, Mar. 17, 1997]
#### In the Matter of DeCaro Capital Investment Group, LLC, et al., Appellants, v William Voekler et al., Respondents.

[821 NYS2d 610]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Board of Zoning Appeals of the Unincorporated Village of Málveme, dated May 27, 2004, which, after a hearing, inter alia, affirmed a decision of the Building Inspector denying the petitioners’ application for a building permit, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Peck, J.), dated December 13, 2004, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Local zoning boards have broad discretion *(see Matter of Pecoraro v Board of Appeals of Town of Hempstead,*2 NY3d 608, 613 [2004]; *Matter of Halperin v City of New Rochelle,*24 AD3d 768, 771 [2005]), and judicial review is thus limited to determining whether the zoning board’s action was arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion *(see Matter of Fuhst v Foley,*45 NY2d 441, 444 [1978]; *Matter of Mangan v Cianciulli,*19 AD3d 598 [2005]).

Here, the denial by the respondent Board of Zoning Appeals of the Unincorporated Village of Malverne (hereinafter the Board) of the petitioners’ application for a building permit on the ground that the proposed use was not permitted in the residential districts in which the property was located had a rational *853basis in the record and was not arbitrary or capricious *(see Matter of Ifrah v Utschig,*98 NY2d 304, 308-309 [2002]; *Matter of Sasso v Osgood,*86 NY2d 374, 384 [1995]; *Matter of Taggart v Tortora,*24 AD3d 456, 457 [2005]). The petitioners failed to establish that the proposed propane filling station was an accessory use to the permitted nursery/garden center. Thus, the Supreme Court properly declined to disturb the Board’s determination *(see Matter of Pecoraro v Board of Appeals of Town of Hempstead, supra*at 614-615; *Matter of Blake v Planning Bd. of Town of Philipstown,*21 AD3d 486, 487 [2005]).

The petitioners’ remaining contention is without merit. Crane, J.P., Ritter, Krausman and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
NRC HOLDS PUBLIC MEETINGS TO DISCUSS PROPOSED CHANGES

TO REGULATIONS FOR RESEARCH AND TEST REACTORS IN

IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, SEPT. 13-14

The NRC will hold two public meetings on Sept. 13-14 during the 2011 National 

Organization of Test, Research and Training Reactors’ Annual meeting in Idaho Falls, Idaho. The 

meeting will provide a forum for the public to ask questions and provide informal comments about 

proposed changes to regulations for research and test reactors (RTR) facilities.

The first meeting, on Sept. 13, is being held to discuss proposals to change the RTR license 

renewal process in order to enhance effectiveness and efficiency. The second meeting on Sept. 14,

is being held to discuss proposals to revise the regulatory guidelines (NUREG-1537) for preparing 

and reviewing applications that pertain to digital instrumentation and control systems for RTR 

facilities. 

Both meetings will be held at the Shilo Inn & Suites, 780 Lindsay Blvd. in Idaho Falls, 

Idaho. The Sept. 13 meeting will run from 1 to 3 p.m. and the Sept. 14 meeting will run from 

8 a.m. to 12 p.m.

For more information or if you need a reasonable accommodation to participate in these 

meetings please notify Duane Hardesty at 301-415-3724 or Duane.Hardesty@nrc.gov, William

Kennedy at 301-415-2784 or William.Kennedy@nrc.gov; and beginning Sept. 12 contact Meghan 

Creedon at 301-415-2170 or Meghan.Creedon@nrc.gov. 

Both meetings will be available for participants to view via Webcast or through 

teleconference.

The full meeting notices are available the NRC public meeting Web page and includes 

directions on viewing the meetings via Web conference and participating by telephone. 

###

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should contact 

the Office of Public Affairs beforehand.

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES link 

on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to 

NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-168 September 7, 2011
Sullivan,

June, 1897.

#### Rowell *v.*Claggett.

An executory agreement for a pledge of property with authority to sell, unaccompanied by possession on the part of the pledgee, is of no effect as against a subsequent attachment by a creditor of the pledgor.

Trover, for a horse, carriage, sleigh, and harness. Facts found by the court. The property was owned by one Sherwood, but was entrusted to the care of his wife’s son Perley. Sherwood was a debtor of his wife and of the plaintiff. Upon a demand by the plaintiff' for the payment of his debt, Sherwood agreed that the plaintiff should take the property and sell it, and if it should bring more than the amount of his claim, he should pay over the balance; and he gave the plaintiff a written order on Perley for the delivery of the property. On the next day, before the plaintiff presented his order, Perley, having learned of its existence and acting under the direction of Mrs. Sherwood, caused the property to be attached by the defendant, a deputy sheriff, in an action upon her claim. The court ordered a verdict for the defendant, and the plaintiff excepted.

*Albert S. Wait,*for the plaintiff.

*George R. Brown,*for the defendant.

Pike, J.

The agreement between Sherwood and the plaintiff did not constitute a sale of the property. It was a mere executory agreement for a pledge with authority to sell. As the plaintiff failed to obtain possession of the property, the pledge was not completed, and the transaction had no effect as against the defendant’s attachment. *Colby*v. *Cressey, 5*N. H. 237; *Brown*v. *Wiggin,*16 N. H. 312; *Wolcott*v. *Keith,*22 N. H. 196, 209.

*Exception overruled.*

Blodgett, J., did not sit: the others concurred.