alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC HOSTING MULTI-AGENCY FEDERAL WORKSHOP JAN. 29-31

ON IMPROVING EXTREME FLOOD EVENT HAZARD ASSESSMENT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will host specialists from several federal agencies,

contractors, industry, academia and other subject-matter experts at NRC headquarters from 

Jan. 29-31 to discuss improved methods to estimate extreme flood event frequencies.

Specialists from several NRC offices developed the workshop together with their 

counterparts at the Department of Energy, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the Army 

Corps of Engineers, the Bureau of Reclamation, and the U.S. Geological Survey. The workshop 

runs from 8:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. each day in the auditorium of the NRC’s White Flint complex at 

11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md. The public is welcome to observe in person or via live 

webcast, which will also be archived for later viewing. Those interested in attending should 

complete a registration form as soon as possible to facilitate navigating NRC security during the 

workshop.

The workshop will examine several issues, starting with the various agencies’

flood-assessment needs for evaluating critical infrastructure. Each day will conclude with a

limited opportunity for the public to ask questions and make comments on workshop topics.

This workshop is part of a research effort to inform future activities meant to incorporate event 

probabilities into a risk-informed approach for external hazards, in this case flood hazards. The 

workshop discussions are separate from ongoing NRC requirements for U.S. nuclear power 

plants to re-examine flooding hazards. The workshop topics exclude licensing issues or 

discussion of specific plants, and no regulatory decisions will be considered.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 13-005 January 22, 2013
BISNIS Trades & Tenders, September 21, 1998 -- Part 1

----
us. Department of 

Transportation 

Office of the Secretary 

of Transportation 

MEMORANDUM TO DOCKET 2009-0155 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

On September 15, 2010, the Secretary of Transportation, together with the Deputy Secretary, 

the General Counsel, Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs, and other senior 

staff, met with Mr. Richard Anderson, CEO of Delta Airlines, and members of his corporate staff. 

Mr, Anderson had requested the meeting. He made several points relating both to the ongoing 

Delta/Virgin antitrust immunity (ATI) proceeding and to the international aviation industry and 

U.S. Airline competition with foreign airlines generally, with emphasis on Delta's role in it. 

With regard to the ATI case, Mr. Anderson discussed the character of the U.S.-Australia market 

and Delta's service in it. He emphasized Delta's position regarding its perceived need for 

antitrust immunity, arguing that two other carriers already serve the market with large market 

shares, and the applicants need ATI to compete effectively. He further asserted that the 

tentative decision was inconsistent with past DOT precedent, and that this was the first 

application to be rejected. 

In response, the Secretary emphasized that the Department reviews applications in a consistent 

manner. The Assistant Secretary expressed her readiness to work with carriers within the 

context of the Department's statutory mandate, and that Delta had been treated fairly and 

openly in the course of the ATI proceeding, She emphasized that the Department must proceed 

and decide in accordance with the statute. 

Both she and the Secretary noted their willingness to grant Delta's unopposed motion for 

additional time to respond to the Department's show-cause order in that case, and to engage 

further with Delta on the issues.
Editorial Note on Part 922
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

§ 922.193 Prohibited or otherwise regulated activities. ( a ) Except as specified in paragraphs (b) through (d) of this section, the following activities are prohibited and thus are unlawful for any person to conduct or to cause to be conducted: ( 1 ) Recovering, altering, destroying, possessing, or attempting to recover, alter, destroy, or possess an underwater cultural resource.
( 2 ) Drilling into, dredging or otherwise altering the lakebottom associated with underwater cultural resources, including contextual information; or constructing, placing or abandoning any structure, material or other matter on the lakebottom associated with underwater cultural resources, except as an incidental result of: ( i ) Anchoring vessels;
( ii ) Traditional fishing operations; or
( iii ) Minor projects (as defined in appendix B of this subpart) that do not adversely affect underwater cultural resources.
( 3 ) Using grappling hooks or other anchoring devices on underwater cultural resource sites that are marked with a mooring buoy.
( 4 ) Interfering with, obstructing, delaying or preventing an investigation, search, seizure or disposition of seized property in connection with enforcement of the Act or any regulations issued under the Act.
( b ) Members of a federally-recognized Indian tribe may exercise treaty-secured rights, subject to the requirements of other applicable law, without regard to the requirements of this subpart. The Director may consult with the governing body of a tribe regarding ways the tribe may exercise such rights consistent with the purposes of the Sanctuary, provided that the rights are authorized by the tribe by regulation, license, or permit.
( c ) The prohibitions in paragraphs (a)(1) through (3) of this section do not apply to valid law enforcement activities, or any activity necessary to respond to an emergency threatening life or the environment.
( d ) The prohibitions in paragraphs (a)(1) through (3) of this section do not apply to any activity: ( 1 ) Specifically authorized by, and conducted in accordance with the scope, purpose, terms and conditions of, a permit issued pursuant to § 922.195 or a special use permit issued pursuant to subpart D of this part.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
[65 FR 39056, June 22, 2000, as amended at 88 FR 19829, Apr. 4, 2023]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 223 (Friday, November 19, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67750-67751]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25661]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1564-DR]


New York; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the

[[Page 67751]]

State of New York (FEMA-1564-DR), dated October 1, 2004, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 10, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of New York is hereby amended to include the following 
area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of October 1, 2004: Chautauqua County for Public 
Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 
Individuals and Households Program-Other Needs, 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)
Michael D. Brown,
Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of 
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 04-25661 Filed 11-18-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
### Part G—Other Benefits
Exhibit 10.46



 



EXHIBIT 10.46


INSURANCE BONUS AGREEMENT



Erie Indemnity Company, a Pennsylvania business corporation (the “Employer”),
and Michael J. Krahe (the “Executive”) intending to be legally bound hereby
agree as follows:



	 	1.	 	The Employer agrees to pay all premiums on life insurance Policy
No.
16 352 040 insuring Executive’s life issued by the Northwestern Mutual
Life Insurance Company of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and owned by Executive
as long as Executive remains employed by the Employer. No
contributions toward the payment of premiums by the Executive are
required.
	 
	 	2.	 	The Executive will execute an endorsement on the policy restricting
the Executive’s right to (a) surrender the policy for its cash value,
(b) obtain a policy loan from the insurance company, (c) assign the
policy as collateral, (d) change the ownership of the policy by
endorsement or assignment, or (e) change insured. The Employer shall
not be entitled to receive any benefits under the policy.
	 
	 	 	 	Employer shall release the endorsement after fifteen (15) years have
passed if Executive was continuously employed by the Employer
throughout that time. If Executive’s employment is terminated for any
reason by either party
during that fifteen (15) year period, the Employer is under no
obligation to release the endorsement. However, if employment is
terminated prior to that time, the Executive retains the right to
convert the policy to a plan of paid up insurance.
	 
	 	3.	 	The Executive will recognize the premium paid hereunder as
additional compensation for federal income tax purposes.
	 
	 	4.	 	The Employer shall, in addition to the premium payment, annually
increase the Executive’s normal compensation by an amount determined by
the following formula: P/1-X where P equals premium paid by the
Employer on the policy pursuant to this Agreement and X equals the
Executive’s marginal Federal income tax bracket for such year plus the
tax rate for any of the following that may be applicable:




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	
(a)
	 	Pennsylvania income tax;
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	
(b)
	 	Employee portion of Pennsylvania
unemployment tax;
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	
(c)
	 	Local income tax;
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	
(d)
	 	Employee portion of FICA OASDI; and
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	
(e)
	 	Employee portion of FICA Medicare.




	 	5.	 	This Agreement is being delivered and is intended to be performed
in Pennsylvania and shall be construed and enforced in accordance with
the laws of Pennsylvania.



45






 







	 	6.	 	This Agreement is the entire understanding among the parties and
may be altered, amended or revoked only by subsequent written
instrument executed by all parties.



WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement this 23rd day of
December, 2003.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	
By:
	 	/s/ Douglas F. Ziegler
	 	 	 	 	

	(Corporate Seal)	 	 	 	Douglas F. Ziegler, Senior Vice President
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	
Attest:
	 	/s/ Jan R. Van Gorder
	 	 	 	 	

	 	 	 	 	  Jan R. Van Gorder, Secretary
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	/s/ Michael J. Krahe
	 	 	 	 	

	 	 	 	 	  Michael J. Krahe



46
# Please wait...

If this message is not eventually replaced by the proper contents of the document, your PDF viewer may not be able to display this type of document.

You can upgrade to the latest version of Adobe Reader for Windows®, Mac, or Linux® by visiting http://www.adobe.com/go/reader_download.

For more assistance with Adobe Reader visit http://www.adobe.com/go/acrreader.

Windows is either a registered trademark or a trademark of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. Mac is a trademark of Apple Inc., registered in the United States and other countries. Linux is the registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the U.S. and other

countries.
#### KING v. UNITED STATES.

No. 4918.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit,

Aug. 2, 1954.

Samuel King filed a brief, pro se.

Selby S. Soward, Asst. U. S. Atty., Topeka, Kan. (William C. Farmer, U. S. Atty., Wichita, Kan., was with him on the brief), for the United States,

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, PICKETT, Circuit Judge, and SAVAGE, District Judge.

*713PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing an application for a writ of ha-beas corpus filed by King.

King was charged by an indictment containing five counts, returned in the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri. The first count charged that King on September 2, 1949, in the Western District of Missouri, did unlawfully sell one-half grain of heroin, a derivative of opium, and one grain of cocaine, a derivative of coca leaves, the same not then and there being sold in pursuance of a written order of the person to whom sold, On a form issued in blank for that purpose by the Secretary of the Treasury of the United States. Counts two, three, four and five charged hke offenses al-kged to have been committed m such District on September 21, 1949, Septena-ber 21 1949, September 22, 1949, and September 25, 1949, respectively.

King pleaded guilty to each count of the indictment. He was sentenced to imprisonment for a term of five years on count one and a term of five years on count two to begin at the expiration of the sentence imposed on count one, and for terms of five years on each of counts three, four, and five to run concurrently with each other and with the sentence imposed on count one.

As ground for the writ, King alleged in his application that he had served the sentence imposed on count one and that the sentences imposed on counts two, three, four, and five were void, in that the offense charged in count one and the offenses charged in counts two, three, four, and five were identical.

King wholly failed to allege any facts showing that the remedy by motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 was inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention.

 Moreover, by his pleas of guilty he admitted the facts charged in the several counts of the indictment,1 and each count, particularly counts one and two, the crucial counts here, charged separate and distinct offenses.2

Affirmed.

1

. Godish v. United States, 40 Cir., 182 F. 2d 842; Norris v. Hudspeth, 10 Cir., 114 F.2d 1007.

2

. See Blockbnrger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 301, 302, 52 S.Ct. 180, 76 L.Ed. 806.
exv4w2



 






Exhibit 4.2








	COMMON STOCK




	THIS CERTIFICATE IS TRANSFERABLE IN




	NEW YORK, NY AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF
THE STATE OF DELAWARE




	DEMANDTEC, INC.




	COMMON STOCK
SEE REVERSE FOR
CERTAIN DEFINITIONS
CUSIP 24802R 50 6




	FULLY PAID AND NONASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, $0.001 PAR VALUE, OF




	DEMANDTEC, INC.




	(the “Corporation”), transferable on the books of the Corporation by the record holder hereof,
in person or by duly authorized attorney, upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.
This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and
Registrar.




	In Witness Whereof the Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by the facsimile
signatures of its duly authorized officers.




	Dated:




	COUNTERSIGNEDAND REGISTERED:
WELLS            FARGO            BANK, N.A.




	TRANSFER AGENT AND
REGISTRAR BY




	SECRETARY




	PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





 









 












	DEMANDTEC, INC.




	The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate,
shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or
regulations:




	TEN COM — as tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT — Custodian




	TEN ENT — as tenants by the entireties(Cust) (Minor) JT TEN — as joint tenants with right of
under Uniform Gifts to Minors survivorship and not as tenants Act in common (State)




	Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.




	For value received, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto




	PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE




	(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE)




	shares of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably
constitute and appoint




	Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full
power of substitution in the premises.
Dated
Signature(s) Guaranteed:




	Signature(s)




	THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR            NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE(S) ON THIS ASSIGNMENT            MUST            CORRESPOND




	INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN            WITH THE NAME(S) AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN




	ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED            EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY




	SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. CHANGE WHATEVER.




	RULE 17Ad-15.
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 20 (Wednesday, January 30, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 483]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00268]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Interventions to Prevent and Treat Addictions Study Section 
(IPTA).
    Date: February 7, 2019.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: The Westgate Hotel, 1055 Second Avenue, San Diego, CA 
92101.
    Contact Person: Marc Boulay, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 3110, MSC 7808, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 300-
6541, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7e1c110b121f0713193e1d0d0c5010171650191108"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="10727f657c71697d77507363623e7e79783e777f66">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in 
advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of 
December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 24, 2019.
Natasha M. Copeland,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-00268 Filed 1-29-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### §406. Postal services at Armed Forces installations

(a) The Postal Service may establish branch post offices at camps, posts, bases, or stations of the Armed Forces and at defense or other strategic installations.

(b) The Secretaries of Defense and Transportation shall make arrangements with the Postal Service to perform postal services through personnel designated by them at or through branch post offices established under subsection (a) of this section.

(c)(1) The Secretary of Defense shall authorize the use of a post office established under subsection (a) in a location outside the United States by citizens of the United States—

(A) who—

(i) are employed by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization; and

(ii) perform functions in support of the Armed Forces of the United States; and

(B) if the Secretary makes a written determination that such use is—

(i) in the best interests of the Department of Defense; and

(ii) otherwise authorized by applicable host nation law or agreement.

(2) No funds may be obligated or expended to establish, maintain, or expand a post office established under subsection (a) for the purpose of use described in paragraph (1) of this subsection.

(Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 724; Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title X, §1056, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1593; Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title XVIII, §1806(a), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 688.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2023—Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 118–31 substituted "shall authorize the use" for "may authorize the use" in introductory provisions.

2019—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 116–92 added subsec. (c).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1971, pursuant to Resolution No. 71–9 of the Board of Governors. See section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note preceding section 101 of this title.
#### Hungarian General Credit-Bank, Respondent, *v.*Edward H. Titus, Appellant.

First Department,

December 8, 1916.

See head note in *Hungarian General Credit-Bank*v. *Titus (ante, p.*504).

Appeal by the defendant, Edward H. Titus, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 5th day of June, 1916, denying defendant’s motion to compel plaintiff to reply to new matter set up in the amended answer by way of avoidance.

*Louis W. Severy,*for the appellant

*Morris Cukor,*for the respondent.

Smith, J.:

By agreement of counsel the question involved upon this appeal is identical with that involved in another appeal in the same case from an order denying a motion to compel the plaintiff to reply to an amended answer (175 App. Div. 504). *507For like reason as therein stated the order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, without costs.

Clarke, P. J., Scott, Page and Davis, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs. Order to be settled on notice.