alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §7624. Breach of agreement: liability

(a) A participant in the Tuition Reimbursement Program who fails to maintain employment as a Department employee permanently assigned to a Department health-care facility—

(1) may not be provided reimbursement for tuition for the course or courses in which the participant is enrolled; and

(2) in lieu of any service obligation arising from participation in the program, shall be liable to the United States for the amount which has been paid or is payable to or on behalf of the participant under the agreement, reduced by the proportion that the number of days served for completion of the service obligation bears to the total number of days in the participant's period of obligated service.

(b) Any amount of damages which the United States is entitled to recover under this section shall be paid to the United States within the one-year period beginning on the date of the breach of the agreement.

(Added Pub. L. 100–322, title II, §216(b), May 20, 1988, 102 Stat. 527, §4324; amended Pub. L. 100–687, div. B, title XV, §1503(a)(4), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4134; renumbered §7624, Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §402(b)(1), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 238; Pub. L. 102–83, §4(a)(3), (4), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 404.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–40 renumbered section 4324 of this title as this section.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–83 substituted "Department" for "Veterans' Administration" in two places in introductory provisions.

1988—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 100–687, §1503(a)(4)(A), substituted "participation in the program" for "completion of a course or courses in a previous semester or quarter", inserted "or is payable" after "has been paid", and inserted before period at end ", reduced by the proportion that the number of days served for completion of the service obligation bears to the total number of days in the participant's period of obligated service".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 100–687, §1503(a)(4)(B), struck out par. (1) which related to formula to apply to recover amount from participant who breaches agreement by failing to complete period of obligated service, and struck out par. (2) designation before "Any amount".
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-2295

___________ Gene Allen Davenport, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Orville L. Coady, District Judge for the * State of Nebraska, Thayer County * Courthouse; John Does; Arthur P. * Appeal from the United States Burnes, Attorney; Joseph Murray, * District Court for the Attorney; Gary R. Young, Thayer * District of Nebraska County Sheriff; Nancy C. McLaughlin, * Clerk of the District Court; Patrick * [UNPUBLISHED] Kenner, CEO, Thayer County Bank; * Lloyd Vancleef, CEO, Citizens State * Bank, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: September 3, 1997 Filed: September 25, 1997

___________ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.TheHonorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District 1 of N ebraska, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable David L

. Piester, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Nebraska. -2- Gene Allen Davenport appeals from a final order of the United States Distric t Court for the District of Nebraska, dismissing his complaint with prejudice for failing 1 to comply wi th Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8, and denying his motions fo r summary j udgment and for default judgment. We have carefully reviewed the record and affirm on the basis of the district court & s opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny his motion for judgment against two appellees. A true copy.
Attest:
CLE RK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT

.
§ 700.81 Appeals. ( a ) Any person who has had a request for adjustment or exception denied by the Office of Strategic Industries and Economic Security under § 700.80, may appeal to the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration, Department of Commerce, who shall review and reconsider the denial. Such appeals should be submitted to the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration, Bureau of Industry and Security, Department of Commerce, Room 3886, Washington, DC 20230, Ref: DPAS Appeals.
( b ) Appeals of denied requests for exceptions from or adjustments to compliance with the provisions of this part or an official action must be received by the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration no later than forty-five (45) days after receipt of a written notice of denial from the Office of Strategic Industries and Economic Security. After this forty-five (45) day period, an appeal may be accepted at the discretion of the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration.
( c ) Each appeal must be in writing and contain a complete statement of all the facts and circumstances related to the action appealed from and a full and precise statement of the reasons the decision should be modified or reversed.
( d ) In addition to the written materials submitted in support of an appeal, an appellant may request, in writing, an opportunity for an informal hearing. This request may be granted or denied at the discretion of the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration.
( e ) When a hearing is granted, the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration may designate an employee of the Department of Commerce to conduct the hearing and to prepare a report. The hearing officer shall determine all procedural questions and impose such time or other limitations deemed reasonable. In the event that the hearing officer decides that a printed transcript is necessary, all expenses shall be borne by the appellant.
( f ) When determining an appeal, the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration may consider all information submitted during the appeal as well as any recommendations, reports, or other relevant information and documents available to the Department of Commerce, or consult with any other persons or groups.
( g ) The submission of an appeal under this section shall not relieve any person from the obligation of complying with the provisions of this part or official action in question while the appeal is being considered, unless such relief is granted in writing by the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration.
( h ) The decision of the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration shall be made within a reasonable time after receipt of the appeal and shall be the final administrative action. It shall be issued to the appellant in writing with a statement of the reasons for the decision.
[49 FR 30414, July 30, 1984. Redesignated at 54 FR 601, Jan. 9, 1989, as amended at 63 FR 31925, June 11, 1998; 71 FR 39528, July 13, 2006; 79 FR 47571, Aug. 14, 2014; 89 FR 58976, July 22, 2024]
NRC SCHEDULES PUBLIC MEETING FOR NOV. 8 TO DISCUSS 

WATTS BAR NUCLEAR UNIT 2 CONSTRUCTION PROJECT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a meeting for Tuesday, 

Nov. 8, to discuss the status of construction at the Watts Bar nuclear plant’s second unit. 

The meeting will begin at 1 p.m. EST with a presentation by NRC staff on the Unit 2 

construction schedule, including major milestones and potential challenges. After the business 

portion of the meeting, the NRC staff will be available to answer questions from members of the 

public. The meeting will be at the Comfort Inn, 2811 Decatur Pike in Athens, Tenn. 

The plant is located near Spring City, Tenn., about 60 miles southwest of Knoxville. The 

NRC extended the construction permit for Watts Bar Unit 2 in 2008. TVA had suspended 

construction of the unit in 1985, but decided in August 2007 to complete the project. TVA plans

to complete construction in 2013.

TVA has been operating Unit 1 at the site since 1996.

Additional information on NRC inspection and oversight of Watts Bar Unit 2

construction activities is available on the NRC website.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No: II-11-063

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416 

 October 31, 2011 

E-mail: OPA2.Resource@nrc.gov
#### Fannie McQUINN, Movant, v. Clay ALEXANDER and Earnest Tuttle, Opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

January 30, 1948.

E. E. Bach, J. Douglas Graham and Leeburn Allen for movant.

F. T. Allen, Elmer Roberts and D. Earl Miller opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal denied; Judgment affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 23, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-20764 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus STERLING THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-540-1

-------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Sterling Thomas has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Thomas has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
# L_2020006EN.01000701.xml

| 10.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 6/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 6/7

---

Information concerning the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and the State of Israel on certain aspects of air services

Agreement between the European Community and the State of Israel on certain aspects of air services, signed in Brussels on 9 December 2008, entered into force on 4 November 2009, in accordance with Article 8 of the Agreement, as the last notification was deposited on 4 November 2009.

---
§ 921.51 Estuarine research guidelines. ( a ) Research within the National Estuarine Research Reserve System shall be conducted in a manner consistent with Estuarine Research Guidelines developed by NOAA.
( b ) A summary of the Estuarine Research Guidelines is published in the Federal Register as a part of the notice of available funds discussed in § 921.50(c).
( c ) The Estuarine Research Guidelines are reviewed annually by NOAA. This review will include an opportunity for comment by the estuarine research community.
### Fw: public comment on proposed smog standards Jackie Ashley to: Tricia Crabtree 01/08/2010 12:16 PM Cc: Alison Davis Tricia - Below is an email comment that we should add to the ozone docket once it opens. Thanks!

_

_________________________________ _ Jackie Ashley Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards US EPA ashley.j ackie@epa.gov 919-541-7664
Cathy Milbourn 01/08/2010 11:35:14 AM One for the docket -------------------------- From: Cathy Milbourn/DC/USEPA/US To: "Andrea Drinkard" <Drinkard.Andrea@epamail.epa.gov>, "Alison Davis" <davis.alison@epa.gov> Date: 01/08/2010 11:35 AM Subject: Fw: public comment on proposed smog standards
One for the docket

-------------------------- Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld

From: j ohn davidson [ j ohnjdavidson@gmail.com] Sent: 01/08/2010 11:32 AM EST To: Cathy Milbourn; Lina Younes Subject: public comment on proposed smog standards 

### Dear Cathy and Linda, Please let my voice be added to the many who support this proposal. I live in downtown Indianapolis and our air quality is terrible. Recently our city was rated as having the erd worst air quality in the USA and there are very few emission standards for consumers or industry. Beyond the scientific data, I can also add that I have had personal harm from the poor air quality. I live and work in downtown Indianapolis, and I often bike or walk to work. On numerous occasions I have had eye and nasal inflammation due to the poor air quality. There have even been occations where my eyes have discharged yellow fluid due to the high levels of chemicals and smog in the air. Thus I am support of this standard, and I would encourage you to increase the emission standards and water standards in our city and the nation. John D

### -- John Davidson Sustainability Consultant Indianapolis, IN
§ 921.12 Post site selection. ( a ) At the time of the coastal state's request for NOAA approval of a proposed site, the state may submit a request for funds to develop the draft management plan and for preparation of the EIS. At this time, the state may also submit a request for the remainder of the predesignation funds to perform a limited basic characterization of the physical, chemical and biological characteristics of the site approved by NOAA necessary for providing EIS information to NOAA. The state's request for these post site selection funds must be accompanied by the information specified in subpart I and, for draft management plan development and EIS information collection, the following programmatic information: ( 1 ) A draft management plan outline (see § 921.13(a) below); and
( 2 ) An outline of a draft memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the state and NOAA detailing the Federal-state role in Reserve management during the initial period of Federal funding and expressing the state's long-term commitment to operate and manage the Reserve.
( b ) The state is eligible to use the funds referenced in § 921.12(a) after the proposed site is approved by NOAA under the terms of § 921.11.
§ 2002.1 Trade Policy Committee Review Group. ( a ) The Trade Executive Committee, established by regulations appearing by 36 FR 23620, December 11, 1971 (15 CFR 2002.1), is abolished and there is hereby established as a subordinate body of the Trade Policy Committee the Trade Policy Committee Review Group (hereinafter referred to as the “Review Group”). The Review Group consists of a Deputy Trade Representative, designated by the Trade Representative, as chairman, and of high level officials designated from their respective agencies or offices by the Secretaries of Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Interior, Labor, State and Treasury, and the Executive Director of the Council on International Economic Policy. The Special Representative or the Deputy Special Representative, as appropriate, and each head of an agency or office, may designate from his respective agency or office high level officials to serve as alternate members of the Review Group in the event the regular member is unable to attend any meeting of the Review Group.
( b ) The Review Group performs the following functions unless such functions are assigned to a different body by the Special Representative or his designee: ( 1 ) Coordinates interagency activities concerning the trade agreements program and related matters;
( 2 ) Recommends policies and actions, and transmits appropriate materials, to the Special Representative concerning the trade agreements program and related matters, or, when appropriate, approves such policies and actions; and
( 3 ) As appropriate, reviews and approves recommendations of the Trade Policy Staff Committee on policies and actions concerning any proposed trade agreements, the trade agreements program, and related matters.
( 4 ) [Reserved]
( 5 ) Performs such other functions as the Special Representative or a Deputy Special Representative may from time to time direct.
[40 FR 18420, Apr. 28, 1975, as amended at 40 FR 39497, Aug. 28, 1975; 40 FR 60042, Dec. 31, 1975; 42 FR 55611, Oct. 18, 1977]
#### § 1110.104 Revocation of certification.

False certification as to any element of § 1110.102(a)(1) through (4) shall be grounds for revocation of certification, in addition to any other penalties at law. A Person properly certified who thereafter becomes aware that the Person no longer satisfies one or more elements of § 1110.102(a) shall promptly inform NTIS thereof in writing.

[81 FR 34892, June 1, 2016]
### §7901. Programs; purpose

(a) In General.—To encourage the recruitment and retention of Department personnel who have the information security skills necessary to meet Department requirements, the Secretary may carry out programs in accordance with this chapter to provide financial support for education in computer science and electrical and computer engineering at accredited institutions of higher education.

(b) Types of Programs.—The programs authorized under this chapter are as follows:

(1) Scholarships for pursuit of doctoral degrees in computer science and electrical and computer engineering at accredited institutions of higher education.

(2) Education debt reduction for Department personnel who hold doctoral degrees in computer science and electrical and computer engineering at accredited institutions of higher education.

(Added Pub. L. 109–461, title IX, §903(a)(1), Dec. 22, 2006, 120 Stat. 3460.)
§ 8a.115 Assurance required. ( a ) *General.* Either at the application stage or the award stage, Federal agencies must ensure that applications for Federal financial assistance or awards of Federal financial assistance contain, be accompanied by, or be covered by a specifically identified assurance from the applicant or recipient, satisfactory to the designated agency official, that each education program or activity operated by the applicant or recipient and to which these Title IX regulations apply will be operated in compliance with these Title IX regulations. An assurance of compliance with these Title IX regulations shall not be satisfactory to the designated agency official if the applicant or recipient to whom such assurance applies fails to commit itself to take whatever remedial action is necessary in accordance with § 8a.110(a) to eliminate existing discrimination on the basis of sex or to eliminate the effects of past discrimination whether occurring prior to or subsequent to the submission to the designated agency official of such assurance.
( b ) *Duration of obligation.* ( 1 ) In the case of Federal financial assistance extended to provide real property or structures thereon, such assurance shall obligate the recipient or, in the case of a subsequent transfer, the transferee, for the period during which the real property or structures are used to provide an education program or activity.
( 2 ) In the case of Federal financial assistance extended to provide personal property, such assurance shall obligate the recipient for the period during which it retains ownership or possession of the property.
( 3 ) In all other cases such assurance shall obligate the recipient for the period during which Federal financial assistance is extended.
( c ) *Form.* ( 1 ) The assurances required by paragraph (a) of this section, which may be included as part of a document that addresses other assurances or obligations, shall include that the applicant or recipient will comply with all applicable Federal statutes relating to nondiscrimination. These include but are not limited to: Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C. 1681-1683, 1685-1688).
( 2 ) The designated agency official will specify the extent to which such assurances will be required of the applicant's or recipient's subgrantees, contractors, subcontractors, transferees, or successors in interest.
§ 8a.310 Recruitment. ( a ) *Nondiscriminatory recruitment.* A recipient to which §§ 8a.300 through 8a.310 apply shall not discriminate on the basis of sex in the recruitment and admission of students. A recipient may be required to undertake additional recruitment efforts for one sex as remedial action pursuant to § 8a.110(a), and may choose to undertake such efforts as affirmative action pursuant to § 8a.110(b).
( b ) *Recruitment at certain institutions.* A recipient to which §§ 8a.300 through 8a.310 apply shall not recruit primarily or exclusively at educational institutions, schools, or entities that admit as students only or predominantly members of one sex, if such actions have the effect of discriminating on the basis of sex in violation of §§ 8a.300 through 8a.310.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

          - RIN 3145-AA58

# AGENCY:

National Science Foundation.

# ACTION:

Notice announcing updated penalty inflation adjustments for civil monetary penalties for 2019.

# SUMMARY:

The National Science Foundation (NSF or Foundation) is providing notice of its adjusted maximum civil monetary penalties, effective January 15, 2019. These adjustments are required by the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015 (the 2015 Act).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bijan Gilanshah, Assistant General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314. Telephone: 703.292.5055.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On June 27, 2016, NSF published an interim final rule amending its regulations to adjust, for inflation, the maximum civil monetary penalties that may be imposed for violations of the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978 (ACA), as amended, 16 U.S.C. 2401*et seq.,*                     and the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 (PFCRA), 31 U.S.C. 3801,                     *et seq.*                     These adjustments are required by the 2015 Act (Sec. 701 of Pub. L. 114-74). The 2015 Act also requires agencies to make subsequent annual adjustments for inflation. Pursuant to OMB guidance dated December 14, 2018, the cost-of-living adjustment multiplier for 2019 is 1.02522. Accordingly, the 2019 annual inflation adjustments for the maximum penalties under the ACA are $17,278 ($16,853 × 1.02522) for violations and $29,239 ($28,520 × 1.02522) for knowing violations of the ACA. Finally, the 2019 annual inflation adjustment for the maximum penalty for violations under PFCRA is $11,463 ($11,181 × 1.02522).                

Dated: December 18, 2018.

Suzanne Plimpton,

Reports Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation.

[FR Doc. 2018-27659 Filed 12-20-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7555-01-P