alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1400.5 Decision. ( a ) *Procedure.* After receipt of an application requesting formal designation as a socially or economically disadvantaged group, the Department of Commerce will publish a notice in the Federal Register that formal designation of this group will be considered. This notice will request comment from the public on the propriety of such a designation. The Department may gather additional information which supports or refutes the group's request. Any member of the public, including Government representatives, may submit information in written form. It is the responsibility of the applicant, however, to submit all relevant information which it wishes considered in its request for a determination of group eligibility.
( b ) *Decision.* A decision will be made within 180 days of the receipt of the request. The decision will be published in the Federal Register. Applicants will also be informed in writing.
( c ) *Appeal.* All questions of eligibility and procedural requirements shall be resolved by the Director, MBDA whose decision shall be final. An applicant may appeal this decision to the Secretary of Commerce. Applicants requesting an appeal should provide any information discovered subsequent to the Director's initial decision which would further their claim. The right to appeal shall be granted at the absolute discretion of the Secretary.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region III

2443 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. III-12-018

Contact: Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil (630) 829-9663

May 21, 2012

E-Mail: OPA3.RegionIII@nrc.gov 

CHARLES A. CASTO NAMED ADMINISTRATOR OF

NRC’S REGION III OFFICE

The U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has named Charles A. Casto 

as the new administrator of its Region III office in Lisle, Ill. Casto officially 

assumed his new position on May 21, 2012. 

As regional administrator, Casto will oversee a staff of more than 300 

employees. Region III is responsible for regulating 16 commercial nuclear 

power plants and over 1,200 materials licensees in seven Midwestern states.

“Charles Casto is exceptionally well qualified to lead Region III in carrying out our 

mission of protecting people and the environment," said Bill Borchardt, the NRC’s executive 

director for operations. “He has held positions of increasing responsibility and continues to 

successfully meet the challenges before him. Most recently, he led the NRC’s team of experts 

dispatched to Japan in response to the emergency at the Fukushima Dai-ichi site. He brings this 

unique experience and insight to Region III to continue our unwavering commitment to safety. "

Casto joined the NRC in 1985 as an Operator Licensing Examiner in Region II. He held a 

number of progressively more responsible leadership positions in Region II from 1997 to 2008. 

He was appointed as Deputy Regional Administrator in Region IV in 2008. In 2010, he returned 

to Region II in the position of Deputy Regional Administrator for Construction, the program

responsible for the oversight of new nuclear plant construction activities. 

Casto was the lead NRC executive providing support to the Japanese government and U.S. 

Ambassador following the earthquake and tsunami that struck Japan affecting several reactors at 

the Fukushima Dai-ichi site between March, 2011 and February, 2012. 

Prior to joining the NRC, Mr. Casto worked in the nuclear industry as an operator and operations 

instructor at Browns Ferry in 1979 and as an NRC certified Senior Reactor Operator Instructor at 

Brunswick in 1984. 
He received a Bachelor's degree from the State University of New York, a Master’s 

degree in Public Administration from the University of Georgia, and is a doctoral student in 

business at Kennesaw State College. 

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ARTURO TOSCANO-VILLASENOR,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-50218

D.C. No. 3:09-cr-03434-L

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

M. James Lorenz, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2011** 

Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Arturo Toscano-Villasenor appeals from the 57-month sentence imposed

following his guilty-plea conviction for attempted entry after deportation, in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and

we affirm.

FILED

FEB 22 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-50218

Toscano-Villasenor contends that the district court erred when it applied a

16-level enhancement, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii), because his prior

conviction for inflicting corporal injury on a spouse or co-habitant, in violation of

section 273.5 of the California Penal Code, does not qualify as a crime of violence. 

This contention is foreclosed by United States v. Laurico-Yeno, 590 F.3d 818, 823

(9th Cir. 2010).

Toscano-Villasenor further contends that the district court procedurally erred

by treating the Sentencing Guidelines as presumptively reasonable. The record

reflects that the district court did not so err. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d

984, 991 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc).

Toscano-Villasenor also contends that the district court imposed a

substantively unreasonable sentence that was greater than necessary to fulfill the

purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). In light of the totality of the circumstances and

the section 3553(a) factors, the sentence at the bottom of the Guidelines range is

substantively reasonable. See Carty, 520 F.3d at 993.

AFFIRMED.
NRC OFFERS HEARING AND COMMENT OPPORTUNITY ON ACQUISITION OF 

WYOMING URANIUM RECOVERY FACILITY BY RUSSIAN FIRM

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission offers the opportunity to request a hearing and 

comment on the proposed transfer of control of Uranium One USA, which holds an NRC license 

for a uranium recovery facility in Wyoming, to JSC Atomredmetzoloto (ARMZ), a Russian 

corporation.

ARMZ entered into an agreement in June to purchase a majority share of Uranium One 

USA’s parent company, Uranium One Inc. of Canada. Uranium One USA submitted a license 

amendment request to the NRC in July, seeking approval of the change of control.

Uranium One USA currently holds an NRC license for the Irigaray-Christensen Ranch 

in-situ leach uranium recovery (ISR) facility in eastern Wyoming. Uranium One Americas, 

another subsidiary of Uranium One Inc., has applied for new licenses for proposed ISR facilities 

at Moore Ranch and Jab & Antelope, both in Wyoming. These applications would also be 

affected by the proposed change of control.

ARMZ is controlled by Rosatom, the Russian Federation’s state agency that oversees the 

Russian nuclear industry. 

A notice of opportunity to request a hearing and opportunity to comment was published 

in the Federal Register today. The notice includes detailed instructions on how to file a hearing 

request. The deadline for requesting a hearing is 20 days after publication.

Comments may be submitted for 30 days after publication of the Federal Register notice, 

over the federal government’s rulemaking website, www.regulations.gov, by searching for 

Docket ID NRC-2010-0300. Comments may also be mailed to Secretary, U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., 20555-0001, ATTN: Rulemakings and Adjudication 

Staff.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-166 September 20, 2010
Search For Partners,   November 23, 1998

----

The Business Information Service for the Newly Independent States (BISNIS) is the U.S.government's clearinghouse for trade and investment information on the Newly IndependentStates of the former Soviet Union.
§ 904.216 Prehearing conferences. ( a ) Prior to any hearing or at any other time deemed appropriate, the Judge may, upon his or her own initiative, or upon the application of any party, direct the parties to appear for a conference or arrange a telephone conference. The Judge shall provide at least 24 hours' notice of the conference to the parties, and shall record such conference by audio recording or court reporter, to consider: ( 1 ) Simplification or clarification of the issues or settlement of the case by consent;
( 2 ) The possibility of obtaining stipulations, admissions, agreements, and rulings on admissibility of documents, understandings on matters already of record, or similar agreements that will avoid unnecessary proof;
( 3 ) Agreements and rulings to facilitate the discovery process;
( 4 ) Limitation of the number of expert witnesses or other avoidance of cumulative evidence;
( 5 ) The procedure, course, and conduct of the administrative proceeding;
( 6 ) The distribution to the parties and the Judge prior to the hearing of written testimony and exhibits in order to expedite the hearing; or
( 7 ) Such other matters as may aid in the disposition of the administrative proceeding, including the status of settlement discussions.
( b ) The Judge in his or her discretion may issue an order showing the matters disposed of in such conference, and shall provide a transcript of the conference upon the request of a party.
[71 FR 12448, Mar. 10, 2006, as amended at 87 FR 38938, June 30, 2022]
# L_2022084EN.01004301.xml

| 11.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 84/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 84/43

---

RECOMMENDATION No 1/2022 OF THE EU-ISRAEL ASSOCIATION COUNCIL

of 8 March 2022

approving the extension of the EU-Israel Action Plan (2022/412)

THE EU-ISRAEL ASSOCIATION COUNCIL,

Having regard to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the State of Israel, of the other part (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | The Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the State of Israel, of the other part (‘the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement’) was signed in Brussels on 20 November 1995 and entered into force on 1 June 2000. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the State of Israel, of the other part (‘the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement’) was signed in Brussels on 20 November 1995 and entered into force on 1 June 2000.

| (2) | Article 69 of the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement gives the Association Council the power to take decisions and make appropriate recommendations. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 69 of the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement gives the Association Council the power to take decisions and make appropriate recommendations.

| (3) | Article 10 of the Rules of Procedure of the Association Council provides for the possibility of taking decisions or recommendations by written procedure between sessions, if the Parties so agree. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Article 10 of the Rules of Procedure of the Association Council provides for the possibility of taking decisions or recommendations by written procedure between sessions, if the Parties so agree.

| (4) | The extension of the EU-Israel Action Plan for three years will give the Parties the opportunity to take forward their cooperation for the coming years, including through the possible negotiation of partnership priorities, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The extension of the EU-Israel Action Plan for three years will give the Parties the opportunity to take forward their cooperation for the coming years, including through the possible negotiation of partnership priorities,

HAS ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION:

Article 1

The Association Council, acting by written procedure, recommends that the EU-Israel Action Plan be extended for three years as of the date of the adoption of this Recommendation.

Article 2

This Recommendation shall take effect on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 8 March 2022.

For the Council

The President

J. BORRELL FONTELLES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 147, 21.6.2000, p. 3.

1

---
# National Diabetes Month, 2004

More than 18 million Americans are estimated to have diabetes. Diabetes is the leading cause of new blindness, end-stage kidney disease, and nontraumatic amputations. It can also double a person's risk of heart attack and stroke and can cause nervous system damage and premature death. During National Diabetes Month, we seek to raise awareness of the impact of diabetes on our citizens, and we recognize those committed to improving the treatment and prevention of this chronic disease.

Approximately one million Americans have been diagnosed with type 1 diabetes, once known as juvenile diabetes. It develops from autoimmune, genetic, and environmental influences, most often striking children, adolescents, and young adults. By developing the disease so young, people with type 1 diabetes have a greater risk for serious complications. Type 2 diabetes affects approximately 17 million Americans, and is most common in people over 40 who are overweight, inactive, or have a family history of this disease. While people of all backgrounds are affected, type 2 diabetes disproportionately strikes African Americans, Hispanic Americans, Asian Americans, and Native Americans. The number of Americans with type 2 diabetes has grown dramatically, and many more Americans are at high risk for developing it.

My Administration is committed to funding diabetes research. This year, the National Institutes of Health dedicated $993 million for diabetes research, and I have requested more that $1 billion for 2005, a 49 percent increase since 2001.

We are also working to raise awareness of the risk factors associated with diabetes. According to clinical research, people at risk for type 2 diabetes can reduce their risk by approximately 58 percent if they lose a modest amount of weight and stay physically active. Those who already live with diabetes can greatly reduce their risk for heart disease and stroke by controlling their blood sugar, blood pressure, and cholesterol.

                    NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim November 2004 as National Diabetes Month. I call upon all Americans to observe this month with appropriate programs and activities.                          ( print page 65048)    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fourth day of November, in the year of our Lord two thousand four, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and twenty-ninth.

[FR Doc. 04-25166

Billing code 3195-01-P
§ 930.61 Public participation. ( a ) Following receipt of the material described in § 930.60 the State agency shall ensure timely public notice of the proposed activity. Public notice shall be provided for the area(s) of the coastal zone likely to be affected by the proposed activity, as determined by the State agency. At the discretion of the State agency, public participation may include one or more public hearings. The State agency shall not require an applicant or a Federal agency to hold a public hearing. State agencies should restrict the period of public notice, receipt of comments, hearing proceedings and final decision-making to the minimum time necessary to reasonably inform the public, obtain sufficient comment, and develop a decision on the matter.
( b ) *Content of public notice.* The public notice shall: ( 1 ) Specify that the proposed activity is subject to review for consistency under the policies of the management program;
( 2 ) Provide sufficient information to serve as a basis for comment;
( 3 ) Specify a source for additional information; and
( 4 ) Specify a contact for submitting comments to the management program.
( c ) Procedural options that may be used by the State agency for issuance of public notice include, but are not limited to, public notice through an official State gazette, a local newspaper serving areas of the coastal zone likely to be affected by the activity, individual State mailings, public notice through a management program newsletter, and electronic notices, e.g., web sites. However, electronic notices, e.g., web sites, shall not be the sole source of a public notification, but may be used in conjunction with other means. Web sites may be used to provide a location for the public to obtain additional information. The State agency may require the applicant to provide the public notice. State agencies shall not require that the Federal agency provide public notice. The State agency may rely upon the public notice provided by the Federal agency reviewing the application for the federal license or permit (e.g., notice of availability of NEPA documents) if such notice satisfies the minimum requirements set forth in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
( d ) Federal and State agencies are encouraged to issue joint public notices, and hold joint public hearings, whenever possible to minimize duplication of effort and to avoid unnecessary delays.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation No. 731-TA-244 (Second Review)] 

## Determination 

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year review, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on natural bristle paint brushes from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.                 

## Background 

The Commission instituted this review on May 3, 2004 (69 FR 24191) and determined on August 6, 2004 that it would conduct an expedited review (69 FR 51474, August 19, 2004). 

The Commission transmitted its determination in this review to the Secretary of Commerce on November 9, 2004. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication No. 3733 (November 2004), entitled Natural Bristle Paint Brushes from China: Investigation No. 731-TA-244 (Second Review). 

Issued: November 16, 2004. 

By order of the Commission.

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 04-25733 Filed 11-18-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
§ 766.23 Related persons. ( a ) *General.* In order to prevent evasion, certain types of orders under this part may be made applicable not only to the respondent, but also to other persons then or thereafter related to the respondent by ownership, control, position of responsibility, affiliation, or other connection in the conduct of trade or business. Orders that may be made applicable to related persons include those that deny or affect export privileges, including temporary denial orders, and those that exclude a respondent from practice before BIS.
( b ) *Procedures.* If BIS has reason to believe that a person is related to the respondent and that an order that is being sought or that has been issued should be made applicable to that person in order to prevent evasion of the order, BIS shall, except in an *ex parte* proceeding under § 766.24(a) of this part, give that person notice in accordance with § 766.5(b) of this part and an opportunity to oppose such action. If the official authorized to issue the order against the respondent finds that the order should be made applicable to that person in order to prevent evasion of the order that official shall issue or amend the order accordingly.
( c ) *Appeals.* Any person named by BIS in an order as related to the respondent may appeal that action. The sole issues to be raised and ruled on in any such appeal are whether the person so named is related to the respondent and whether the order is justified in order to prevent evasion. ( 1 ) A person named as related to the respondent in an order issued pursuant to § 766.25 may file an appeal with the Under Secretary for Industry and Security pursuant to part 756 of the EAR.
( 2 ) A person named as related to the respondent in an order issued pursuant to other provisions of this part may file an appeal with the administrative law judge. ( i ) If the order made applicable to the related person is for a violation related to part 760 of the EAR, the related person may file an appeal with the administrative law judge. The related person may appeal the initial decision and order of the administrative law judge to the Under Secretary in accordance with the procedures set forth in § 766.21.
( ii ) If the order made applicable to the related person is issued pursuant to § 766.24 of this part to prevent an imminent violation, the recommended decision and order of the administrative law judge shall be reviewed by the Under Secretary in accordance with the procedures set forth in § 766.24(e) of this part.
( iii ) If the order made applicable to the related person is for a violation of the EAR not related to part 760 of the EAR and not issued pursuant to § 766.24 of this part, the recommended decision and order of the administrative law judge shall be reviewed by the Under Secretary in accordance with the procedures set forth in § 766.22 of this part.
[61 FR 12907, Mar. 25, 1996, as amended at 71 FR 27605, May 12, 2006]