alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
131924 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131924 COA: 258266 Washtenaw CC: 01-001965-FC OMAR JERMAINE GATES, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the Ju ly 13, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s1220 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 29, 2006

Clerk
§ 530.307 OPM review and adjustment of special rate schedules. ( a ) OPM may review an established special rate schedule at any time to determine whether that schedule should be increased, decreased, or discontinued, taking into account the circumstances listed in § 530.304(b) and the factors listed in § 530.306 that led to establishing the schedule. An authorized agency official may request that OPM conduct such a review of one or more special rate schedules.
( b ) OPM may designate lead agencies to assist in the review of designated special rate schedules and to coordinate the collection of relevant data. Each affected agency is responsible for submitting complete supporting data upon request to OPM or the lead agency, as appropriate.
( c ) OPM will adjust a special rate schedule by determining the amount of the special rate supplement to be paid on top of the current GS rate for each rate range within the schedule. OPM will determine the extent to which special rate supplements are to be adjusted (increased or decreased), if at all, and when the special rate supplements are to be adjusted. As provided in 5 U.S.C. 5305(d), special rate schedule adjustments made by OPM have the force and effect of statute.
( d ) ( 1 ) For special rate schedules computed by applying a fixed-percentage supplement on top of each GS rate within a rate range, OPM may require that a change in the underlying GS rate automatically results in an adjusted special rate schedule, unless OPM determines that an adjustment in the supplement percentage is appropriate for one or more special rate schedules.
( 2 ) For special rate schedules computed by applying a fixed-dollar supplement on top of each GS rate within a rate range, OPM may require that special rate supplements generally be adjusted to reflect the increase in GS rates, unless OPM determines that a different adjustment is appropriate for one or more special rate schedules.
( e ) If OPM determines that a special rate schedule, or a rate range within a special rate schedule, is no longer needed to ensure satisfactory recruitment or retention of qualified employees, OPM may discontinue the schedule or rate range. Consistent with § 530.303(d), if all employees and positions covered by a special rate schedule or rate range are entitled to a higher rate of basic pay, the schedule or rate range (as applicable) will be automatically discontinued.
( f ) OPM may change the established conditions for coverage under a special rate schedule at any time based on a reevaluation of the circumstances and factors that led to establishing the schedule. Expansion of coverage is equivalent to establishing a special rate schedule for a category of affected employees. Reduction of coverage is the equivalent of discontinuing a special rate schedule for a category of affected employees.
( g ) When a special rate schedule is adjusted or discontinued, or when there is a change in a schedule's coverage criteria, the rate of pay for affected employees must be set as provided in §§ 530.321 through 530.323.
### §50103. Purposes

(a) Provided in Articles of Incorporation.—The purposes of the corporation are as provided in the articles of incorporation.

(b) Perpetuating Memories.—To perpetuate the memories of the fathers of the Daughters of Union Veterans of the Civil War 1861–1865, their loyalty to the Union, and their unselfish sacrifices for the preservation of the Union, the purposes of the corporation also include—

(1) encouraging the preservation of historic sites and the construction and preservation of monuments commemorating any aspect of the Civil War;

(2) building and maintaining a Museum of Civil War History, admission to which shall be free and open to the public, in the city of Springfield, Illinois, as a repository of Civil War documents, artifacts, and cultural relics;

(3) maintaining a library in connection with the Civil War museum, admission to which shall be open to the public, containing the official volumes of the War of the Rebellion Records, Civil War genealogical files, Adjutant General reports of the various States, military and biographical records and accounts of the individual service of Union soldiers, sailors, and marines, diaries, letters, relics, and other records;

(4) promulgating and teaching American history, particularly the history of the Civil War period, through the establishment of scholarship programs at the national and State levels, the presentation of American flags to youth groups and newly naturalized citizens, and the sponsorship of contests of educational merit;

(5) caring for veterans of all wars through volunteer programs in Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers and in homes and other institutions maintained by the States for the welfare of American veterans; and

(6) participating, in a spirit of cooperation and reciprocity, in programs with other societies devoted to American history, veterans' affairs, or community interests.

(c) Veterans' and Patriotic Organization.—The corporation shall function as a veterans' and patriotic organization as authorized by the laws of each State in which it is incorporated.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1341.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 50103 | 36:3703. | Dec. 9, 1985, Pub. L. 99–172, §3, 99 Stat. 1020; June 13, 1991, Pub. L. 102–54, §13(n)(8), 105 Stat. 278. |

Section

The word "objects" is omitted as included in "purposes" and for consistency in the revised title.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2293 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2293

    To amend the National Labor Relations Act to prevent government 
 agencies from requiring or prohibiting employers in the construction 
      industry to enter into agreements with labor organizations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 2, 2003

   Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
        referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the National Labor Relations Act to prevent government 
 agencies from requiring or prohibiting employers in the construction 
      industry to enter into agreements with labor organizations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Government Labor Neutrality Act of 
2003''.

SEC. 2. MANDATE OF GOVERNMENT LABOR NEUTRALITY TOWARD EMPLOYERS COVERED 
              UNDER THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS ACT.

    Section 8(e) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 158(e)) 
is amended by adding at the end of the first proviso the following: 
``Provided further, That notwithstanding any other provision of this 
Act, an agency or department of the Government, an agent acting on the 
Government's behalf, a recipient of a Federal grant or financial 
assistance, a person who has entered into a cooperative agreements with 
the Government, a State or political subdivision thereof, shall not 
require or prohibit an employer in the construction industry to enter 
into an agreement with a labor organization in connection with any 
construction, alteration, painting, or repair work.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

SMALL BUSINESS FLOURISHES IN KRASNODAR
by Padraic J. Sweeney

"We're investing in Russian agribusiness through training, hybrid seeds, and
equipment," replied Harriet Peterson, president of Cornerstone International Group,
when asked recently about her firm's business in Southern Russia's lush Krasnodar
Krai.  U.S. food growers and processors are already establishing a foothold in
Krasnodar, one of Russia's most productive agricultural regions.  Along with
industry giants such as Cargill, Phillip Morris, and Conagra, small entrepreneurial
ventures like Cornerstone are prospering there, as Russia's farm sector gradually
adapts to a market economy.

Cornerstone raises popcorn in Krasnodar, using seed imported from the United
States.  After processing and packaging, its product is distributed in Russia,
Ukraine and other NIS countries.  Attracted by the krai's long, warm growing
season and the emphasis on agriculture in the local economy, Peterson believes
that Krasnodar is an area that "any agribusiness company should be looking at" if
they're interested in doing business in Russia.

Training Local Growers

Cornerstone contracts with farmers in the Adygai Autonomous Republic, which lies
entirely within the borders of Krasnodar Krai, to grow popcorn from hybrid U.S.
seed.  Since growing popcorn differs somewhat from growing other types of corn,
Cornerstone provides technical assistance to support its local contractors.  "We
want our farmers to use the best of U.S. farming to get good yields, making
business more profitable for all of us," Peterson says.

Since popcorn is a relatively new product in Russia, and quality was not a high
priority in the Soviet-era food-processing industry, setting and maintaining high
standards is very important.  As a result, Cornerstone closely supervises the entire
growing, cleaning and packaging process.  "We aren't going to compromise the
quality of our product just because we are producing in Russia," Peterson told
BISNIS Bulletin recently.

Cornerstone has generally found the local business people to be interested, if
somewhat inexperienced, in dealing with U.S. companies.  Farmers, especially in
the Adygai Republic, are quite eager to work with a U.S. firm, Peterson said.  To
do so successfully, however, they need technical assistance and payment and
credit terms to help them overcome Russia's lack of an effective farm credit
system.  The Krasnodar Krai and Adygai Republic governments generally are
receptive to foreign companies in Krasnodar, in Peterson's experience.  Some older
officials view foreigners and foreign businesses with suspicion, but they recognize
the importance of Western investment to expanding and modernizing Krasnodar's
economy.  Peterson is bullish on the region: "Today the area is unknown by many
Western firms.  But as more companies and more support services get in there,
Krasnodar Krai and Adygai will be the center of Western agribusiness in the NIS." 

Padraic Sweeney is Editor-in-Chief of BISNIS Bulletin.
```
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 4

- 00 360

- C V

Style: George M. Bishop, et al. v. Chappell Hill Service Company, LLC

and High Meadows Land & Cattle, LLC

Date motion filed * : August 14, 201 4

Type of motion: Motion to Dismiss

Party filing motion: Appell ee

Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? No

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due:

 Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional

motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________

Appell ee s ’ motion to dismiss the appeal , filed within appellee s ’ response , is

ordered taken with the case. The Clerk of this Court is ordered to docket the

appellee s ’ response and motion to dismiss, which has been filed only as a motion,

also as appellee s ’ brief.

Judge's signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting

Panel consists of

____________________________________________

Date: _ July 30, 2015

_
Exhibit 31.2  Certification Pursuant to pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended  I, Hui Lin, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-QSB of AIDA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. As the registrant's certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and I have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the  registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  5. As the registrant's certifying officer, I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.   /s/ Hui Lin Hui Lin Chief Financial Officer  Date: November 13, 2006
**GAO-02-959**                      Published: Sep 24, 2002. Publicly Released: Sep 24, 2002.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Status of FY22 Projects 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

The Fiscal Year 2002 Defense Authorization Act required GAO to review GuardNet, the National Guard's wide-area network, which is used to support various Defense applications and was used to support homeland security activities after the terrorist attacks of September 11th. GAO was asked to determine the current and potential requirements for GuardNet and the effectiveness of the processes for managing the network's requirements, configuration, and security.

## Recommendations

## Recommendations for Executive Action

See All 7 Recommendations

## Full Report

Highlights

Full Report (43 pages)

Accessible Text 

## Office of Public Affairs

### Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

### Public Inquiries

Public Affairs
PublicAffairs@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

National Defense

Computer networksFirewallsComputer securityEmergency preparednessHomeland securityInformation resources managementInformation systemsInternal controlsNational GuardSystems management
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Jack Thomas Badgett v. Monte Land G'Sell, Individually, Monte Land 

G'Sell Revocable Living Trust and Monte Land G'Sell, TTEE

Appellate case number: 01-22-00587-CV

Trial court case number: 2019-42337

Trial court: 113th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Jack Thomas Badgett, appeals from the trial court’s May 27, 2022 judgment 

after a bench trial and awarding damages to appellees, Monte Land G’Sell, Individually, Monte 

Land G’Sell Revocable Living Trust, and Monte Land G’Sell, TTEE. Pending before this Court 

is appellant’s motion to abate and order the trial court to prepare and file findings of fact and 

conclusions of law. 

Appellant contends that he filed a timely request for findings of fact and conclusions of 

law on June 9, 2022 and then a notice of past due findings and conclusions on July 7, 2022. 

Appellant asserts that the trial court has not filed findings and conclusions. The clerk’s record 

filed on September 22, 2022 contains no findings of fact and conclusions of law.

“When properly and timely requested, the trial court has a mandatory duty to file findings 

of fact and conclusions of law.” Glass v. Williamson, 137 S.W.3d 114, 117–18 (Tex. App.—

Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, no pet.). Appellant’s request for findings of fact and his notice of past 

due findings and conclusions were timely filed. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 296, 297.

Accordingly, we grant appellant’s motion. We abate the appeal and remand to the trial 

court for preparation of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial court shall forward a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings of fact and conclusions of law within 30 days 

of the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: _____/s/ Richard Hightower________

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___October 4, 2022___
#### Francis Cammisa et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Francesco Valentino & Company, Appellants, v. City of New York, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — ■ Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ.
Third Addendum to Management Services Agreement



 Exhibit 10.6 
 THIRD ADDENDUM TO MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT 
 This Third Addendum (the “Addendum”) is entered into as of August 1, 2007, by and between CALIFORNIA RADIATION THERAPY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., a California corporation (“Manager”) and
21ST CENTURY ONCOLOGY OF CALIFORNIA A MEDICAL CORPORATION, a California medical corporation (“Medical Group”). This Addendum amends Sections
1.(a) of the Management Services Agreement dated May 1, 2006, as set forth below. 
 From and after the date here of, 

 

	 	(i)	Section 1.(a) shall be amended to read as follows: 

 “(a)
Management. The Manager will be responsible for general management and administration operations of the Office locations, excluding the provision of medical services, set forth on Exhibit B hereto. The Manager shall not engage in the practice
of medicine.” 
  

					
	 Accepted:
	 	CALIFORNIA RADIATION THERAPY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
			
		 	By:	 	 /s/ David N.T. Watson

		 		 	David N.T. Watson
		 		 	Vice President
		
	 Accepted:
	 	21ST CENTURY ONCOLOGY OF CALIFORNIA, A MEDICAL CORPORATION
			
		 	By:	 	 /s/ Daniel E. Dosoretz

		 		 	Daniel E. Dosoretz, M.D.
		 		 	Vice President








 EXHIBIT B 
 THIRD ADDENDUM TO MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT 
 Office Locations and Manager
Compensation 
  

			
	 Office Location
	  	 Manager
 Compensation
 as a % of Net
 Collected Dollars

	 Palm Desert
 77840 Flora Road
 Palm Desert, CA 92211
	  	77%
		
	 Santa Monica
 2428 Santa Monica Boulevard
 Suite 103
 Santa Monica, CA 90404
	  	77%
		
	 Beverly Hills Radiation Oncology
 150 N. Robertson Blvd.
 Suite 160
 Beverly Hills, CA 90221
	  	77%
		
	 Vidya S. Bobba, M.D., Inc.
 963 Butte Street
 Redding, CA 96001
	  	77%
**VENONA Historical Monograph #4:The KGB in San Francisco and Mexico City andthe GRU in New York and Washington**

     The release of VENONA translations involved careful consideration of
§ 837.505 Cost-of-living adjustments on Member annuities. ( a ) *Applying cost-of-living adjustments to recomputed Member annuities under CSRS.* A member annuity benefit that is recomputed under section 8344(d)(1) of title 5, United States Code, which applies to certain former Members who become employed in an appointive position subject to CSRS, will include the cost-of-living adjustments under section 8340 of title 5, United States Code, that are effective after the commencing date of the benefit computed under section 8344(d)(1).
( b ) *Limitations on cost-of-living adjustments on recomputed Member annuities under CSRS.* For purposes of determining limitations on cost-of-living adjustments under section 8340(g) of title 5, United States Code, the final (or average) salary of a Member whose benefit has been recomputed under section 8344(d)(1) of title 5, United States Code, which applies to certain former Members who become employed in an appointive position subject to CSRS, will be increased by adjustments in the rates of the General Schedule under subpart I of chapter 53 of title 5, United States Code, that are effective after the commencing date of the benefit computed under section 8344(d)(1).
[59 FR 10267, Mar. 4, 1994]