alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 904.211 Failure to appear. ( a ) If, after proper service of notice, any party appears at the hearing and an opposing party fails to appear, the Judge is authorized to: ( 1 ) Dismiss the case with prejudice, where the Agency is a non-appearing party; or
( 2 ) Where the respondents have failed to appear, find the facts as alleged in the NOVA, NOPS and/or NIDP and enter a default judgment against the respondents.
( b ) Following an order of default judgment, a non-appearing party may file a petition for reconsideration, in accordance with § 904.272. Only petitions citing reasons for non-appearance, as opposed to arguing the merits of the case, will be considered.
( c ) The Judge will place in the record all the facts concerning the issuance and service of the notice of time and place of hearing.
( d ) The Judge may deem a failure of a party to appear after proper notice a waiver of any right to a hearing and consent to the making of a decision on the record.
( e ) Failure to appear at a hearing shall not be deemed to be a waiver of the right to be served with a copy of the Judge's decision.
§ 745.2 End-Use Certificate reporting requirements under the Chemical Weapons Convention. Note:
The End-Use Certificate requirement of this section does not relieve the exporter of any requirement to obtain a license from the Department of Commerce for the export of Schedule 3 chemicals subject to the Export Administration Regulations or from the Department of State for the export of Schedule 3 chemicals subject to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations.
( a ) ( 1 ) No U.S. person, as defined in § 744.6(c) of the EAR, may export from the United States any Schedule 3 chemical identified in supplement no. 1 to this part to countries not party to the Chemical Weapons Convention (destinations *not* listed in supplement no. 2 to this part) unless the U.S. person obtains from the consignee an End-Use Certificate issued by the government of the importing destination. This Certificate must be issued by the foreign government's agency responsible for foreign affairs or any other agency or department designated by the importing government for this purpose. Supplement no. 3 to this part includes foreign authorized agencies responsible for issuing End-Use Certificates pursuant to this section. Additional foreign authorized agencies responsible for issuing End-Use Certificates will be included in supplement no. 3 to this part when known. End-Use Certificates may be issued to cover aggregate quantities against which multiple shipments may be made to a single consignee. An End-Use Certificate covering multiple shipments may be used until the aggregate quantity is shipped. End-Use Certificates must be submitted separately from license applications.
( 2 ) Submit a copy of the End-Use Certificate, no later than 7 days after the date of export, either by fax to (202) 482-1731 or by mail or courier delivery to the following address: Information Technology Team, Treaty Compliance Division, Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 4515, 14th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230. Attn: “CWC End-Use Certificate Report”.
( b ) The End-Use Certificate described in paragraph (a) of this section must state the following: ( 1 ) That the chemicals will be used only for purposes not prohibited under the Chemical Weapons Convention;
( 2 ) That the chemicals will not be transferred to other end-user(s) or end-use(s);
( 3 ) The types and quantities of chemicals;
( 4 ) Their specific end-use(s); and
( 5 ) The name(s) and complete address(es) of the end-user(s).
[64 FR 27143, May 18, 1999, as amended at 64 FR 49381, Sept. 13, 1999; 66 FR 49525, Sept. 28, 2001; 73 FR 38910, July 8, 2008]
Order entered September 2, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01176-CR

HARVEY CATHCART IV, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-1476880-K

ORDER

The State’s August 31, 2016 motion for extension of time to file a brief is GRANTED, 

and the State’s brief submitted to this Court on August 31, 2016 is ORDERED filed as of that 

date.

/s/ MOLLY FRANCIS 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
|                                                         |                | Exhibit 99(c)
|-------------------------------------------------------- | -------------- | -------------
|Household Finance Corporation                            |                |              
|Household Receivables Funding, Inc. III                  |                |              
|Household Credit Card Master Note Trust I, Series 2001-2 |               
|                                                         |                |              
|                                                         |                |              
|Original Class A Principal                               | 500,000,000.00 |              
|Number of Class A Bonds (000's)                          | 500,000.00     |              
|Original Class B Principal                               | 43,807,000.00  |              
|Number of Class B Bonds (000's)                          | 43,807.00      |              
|                                                         |                |              
|                                                         |                |              
|Distribution Date                                        |                | 2003 Totals  
|                                                         |                |              
|CLASS A                                                  |                |              
|Class A Principal Distributions                          |                | 0.00         
|Class A Interest                                         |                | 6,659,299.03 
|                                                         |                |              
|                                                         |                |              
|CLASS B                                                  |                |              
|Class B Principal Distributions                          |                | 0.00         
|Class B Interest                                         |                | 696,396.90
#### Grace Pursifull Van Camp v. W. Elmer Hupp et al.

October 3, 1947.

Sidney B. Neal, Judge.

Thomas E. Sandidge for appellant.

Fowler & Holbrook, O. L. Fowler and R. Miller Holland for appellee.

Opinion of the Court bt

Clay, Commissioner

Affirming.

This is a companion case to Van Camp v. Evans et al., 306 Ky. 59, 206 S. W. 2d No. 1, and involves the same issue. For the reasons stated in that opinion the judgment is affirmed.
### [§§3525, 3526. Vacant]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Prior to renumbering of sections 1700 to 1766 of this chapter as sections 3500 to 3566 by Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 406, sections 1725 and 1726 of this chapter were repealed.

Section 1725, Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1197, which related to period of operation for approval by Administrator, was repealed by Pub. L. 92–540, title IV, §402(2), Oct. 24, 1972, 86 Stat. 1090.

Section 1726, Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1197, which provided for control by agencies of United States, was repealed by Pub. L. 89–358, §3(a)(3), Mar. 3, 1966, 80 Stat. 20.
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-008-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
#### § 60.1 Public information.

The rules and procedures regarding public access to the records of the Bureau of the Census are found at 15 CFR part 4.

[57 FR 40841, Sept. 8, 1992]
### §3633. Provisions applicable to rates for competitive products

(a) In General.—The Postal Regulatory Commission shall, within 18 months after the date of enactment of this section, promulgate (and may from time to time thereafter revise) regulations to—

(1) prohibit the subsidization of competitive products by market-dominant products;

(2) ensure that each competitive product covers its costs attributable; and

(3) ensure that all competitive products collectively cover what the Commission determines to be an appropriate share of the institutional costs of the Postal Service.

(b) Review of Minimum Contribution.—Five years after the date of enactment of this section, and every 5 years thereafter, the Postal Regulatory Commission shall conduct a review to determine whether the institutional costs contribution requirement under subsection (a)(3) should be retained in its current form, modified, or eliminated. In making its determination, the Commission shall consider all relevant circumstances, including the prevailing competitive conditions in the market, and the degree to which any costs are uniquely or disproportionately associated with any competitive products.

(Added Pub. L. 109–435, title II, §202, Dec. 20, 2006, 120 Stat. 3206.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of enactment of this section, referred to in text, is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 109–435, which was approved Dec. 20, 2006.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Review of Postal Service Cost Attribution Guidelines

Pub. L. 117–108, title II, §203, Apr. 6, 2022, 136 Stat. 1147, provided that: "Not later than the date that is one year after the date of the enactment of this Act [Apr. 6, 2022], the Postal Regulatory Commission shall initiate a review of the regulations issued pursuant to sections 3633(a) and 3652(a)(1) of title 39, United States Code, to determine whether revisions are appropriate to ensure that all direct and indirect costs attributable to competitive and market-dominant products are properly attributed to those products, including by considering the underlying methodologies in determining cost attribution and considering options to revise such methodologies. If the Commission determines, after notice and opportunity for public comment, that revisions are appropriate, the Commission shall make modifications or adopt alternative methodologies as necessary."

[For definitions of terms used in section 203 of Pub. L. 117–108, set out above, see section 2 of Pub. L. 117–108, set out as a note under section 501 of this title.]

#### Study on Equal Application of Laws to Competitive Products

Pub. L. 109–435, title VII, §703, Dec. 20, 2006, 120 Stat. 3244, required the Federal Trade Commission to prepare and submit to the President and Congress, and to the Postal Regulatory Commission, within 1 year after Dec. 20, 2006, a comprehensive report identifying Federal and State laws that applied differently to the United States Postal Service with respect to the competitive category of mail (within the meaning of section 102 of this title) and to private companies providing similar products.
§ 906.10 Evidence. ( a ) The Federal Rules of Evidence do not apply to NAO proceedings.
( b ) An appellate officer will decide whether to admit evidence into the NAO case record. ( 1 ) An appellate officer may exclude unduly repetitious, irrelevant, and immaterial evidence. An appellate officer may also exclude evidence to avoid undue prejudice, confusion of the issues, undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.
( 2 ) An appellate officer may consider hearsay evidence.
( c ) Copies of documents may be offered as evidence, provided they are of equal legibility and quality as the originals, and such copies shall have the same force and effect as if they were originals. If an appellate officer so directs, a party shall submit original documents to the appellate officer.
( d ) An appellate officer may take official notice of Federal or State public records and of any matter of which courts may take judicial notice.
( e ) An appellate officer may request, and the program office that issued the initial administrative determination in the case before the appellate officer will provide, the interpretation(s) of the law made by the program office and applied to the facts in the case.
§ 971.302 Denial of certification. ( a ) The Administrator may deny certification of an application if the Administrator finds that the requirements of this subpart, or the requirements for issuance or transfer under § 971.403 through § 971.408, have not been met.
( b ) When the Administrator proposes to deny certification the Administrator will send to the applicant, via certified mail, return receipt requested, and publish in the Federal Register, written notice of intention to deny certification. The notice will include: ( 1 ) The basis upon which the Administrator proposes to deny certification; and
( 2 ) If the basis for the proposed denial is a deficiency which the Administrator believes the applicant can correct: ( i ) The action believed necessary to correct the deficiency; and
( ii ) The time within which any correctable deficiency must be corrected (not to exceed 180 days except as specified by the Administrator for good cause).
( c ) The Administrator will deny certification: ( 1 ) On the 30th day after the date the notice is received by the applicant, under paragraph (b) of the section, unless before the 30th day the applicant files with the Administrator a written request for an administrative review of the proposed denial; or
( 2 ) On the last day of the period established under paragraph (b)(2)(ii) in which the applicant must correct a deficiency, if that deficiency has not been corrected before that day and an administrative review requested pursuant to paragraph (c)(1) is not pending or in progress.
( d ) If a timely request for administrative review of the proposed denial is made by the applicant under paragraph (c)(1) of this section, the Administrator will promptly begin a formal hearing. If the proposed denial is the result of a correctable deficiency, the administrative review will proceed concurrently with any attempts to correct the deficiency, unless the parties agree otherwise or the administrative law judge orders differently.
( e ) If the Administrator denies certification, he will send to the applicant written notice of the denial, including the reasons therefor.
( f ) Any final determination by the Administrator granting or denying certification is subject to judicial review as provided in chapter 7 of title 5, United States Code.
# L_2023057EN.01001401.xml

| 23.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 57/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 57/14

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 36/2020

of 20 March 2020

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2023/350]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/1966 of 27 November 2019 amending and correcting Annexes II, III and V to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cosmetic products (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/1966 of 27 November 2019 amending and correcting Annexes II, III and V to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cosmetic products (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 1a (Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XVI of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32019 R 1966: Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/1966 of 27 November 2019 (OJ L 307, 28.11.2019, p. 15).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32019 R 1966: Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/1966 of 27 November 2019 (OJ L 307, 28.11.2019, p. 15).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) 2019/1966 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 21 March 2020, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 20 March 2020.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Clara GANSLANDT

---

(1)  
  OJ L 307, 28.11.2019, p. 15.

1

(*)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*

---
§ 892.402 I am a survivor annuitant as well as an active Federal employee; am I eligible for premium conversion? ( a ) If you are a survivor annuitant enrolled in FEHB who is receiving an annuity and you are employed in a position that conveys FEHB eligibility and is covered by the premium conversion plan, you are eligible to participate in premium conversion.
( b ) ( 1 ) If you wish to participate in premium conversion, you must notify your employing agency. Your employing agency will transfer in your FEHB coverage from the retirement system, and your employing agency will assume responsibility for contributing the government share of your FEHB coverage. Your coverage, including what FEHB plans you are eligible to enroll in, will be based on your status as an active employee and your employing agency will deduct your premiums from your salary.
( 2 ) If you do not notify your employing agency that you wish to participate in premium conversion, you will keep your FEHB coverage as a survivor annuitant, but your contributions towards your FEHB premiums will be made on an after-tax basis. Your status as an annuitant under the retirement regulations and your right to continue FEHB as a survivor annuitant following your period of employment is unaffected.
[68 FR 56529, Oct. 1, 2003]
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

July 29, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 136106 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 136106 COA: 279979 Oakland CC: 05-205251-FH COLLIN DENNARD PITTMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 19, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

d0721 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 29, 2008

Clerk
# L_2014069EN.01000101.xml

| 8.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 69/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 69/1

---

Information on the date of entry into force of the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community on the one hand, and the Government of Denmark and the Home Rule Government of Greenland, on the other hand

Following signature on 18 September 2012, the Government of Denmark, the Home Rule Government of Greenland and the European Union notified on 21 December 2012, on 28 December 2012 and on 29 January 2014 respectively that they had finalised their internal procedures to conclude the Protocol to the Fisheries Partnership Agreement.

The Protocol accordingly entered into force on 29 January 2014 pursuant to Article 13.1 thereof.

---
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 20 (Wednesday, January 30, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 484-485]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00294]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; PAR-17-123: Biomarkers 
for Diabetes, Digestive, Kidney and Urologic Diseases using Samples 
from the NIDDK Repository.
    Date: February 11, 2019.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Najma S. Begum, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Review Branch,

[[Page 485]]

DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Room 7349, 6707 Democracy 
Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 594-8894, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d0b2b5b7a5bdbe90beb9b4b4bbfebeb9b8feb7bfa6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="76141311031b1836181f12121d58181f1e58111900">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in 
advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of 
December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: January 24, 2019.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-00294 Filed 1-29-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

CYNTHIA L. POLLICK.

Petitioner

v.

ANTHONY P. TROZZOLILLO,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 278 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 17th day of October, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.