alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1729B. Consolidated patient accounting centers

(a) In General.—Not later than five years after the date of the enactment of this section, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall establish not more than seven consolidated patient accounting centers for conducting industry-modeled regionalized billing and collection activities of the Department.

(b) Functions.—The centers shall carry out the following functions:

(1) Reengineer and integrate all business processes of the revenue cycle of the Department.

(2) Standardize and coordinate all activities of the Department related to the revenue cycle for all health care services furnished to veterans for non-service-connected medical conditions.

(3) Apply commercial industry standards for measures of access, timeliness, and performance metrics with respect to revenue enhancement of the Department.

(4) Apply other requirements with respect to such revenue cycle improvement as the Secretary may specify.

(Added Pub. L. 110–387, title IV, §406(a), Oct. 10, 2008, 122 Stat. 4129.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of the enactment of this section, referred to in subsec. (a), is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–387, which was approved Oct. 10, 2008.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1729B, added Pub. L. 106–117, title II, §202(a), Nov. 30, 1999, 113 Stat. 1561; amended Pub. L. 107–103, title V, §509(c), Dec. 27, 2001, 115 Stat. 997; Pub. L. 107–330, title III, §308(g)(7), Dec. 6, 2002, 116 Stat. 2829, related to the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Improvement Fund, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 108–7, div. K, title I, §113(a)(1), Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 482.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Balance

Pub. L. 108–7, div. K, title I, §113(a)(1), Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 482, repealed former section 1729B of this title and provided that any balance as of Feb. 20, 2003, in the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Improvement Fund established under former section 1729B was to be transferred to the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Care Collections Fund established under section 1729A of this title.
### SUBCHAPTER VII—PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
I 

I 

I 

I 

i 

I 

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of --

ProLogic Inc. 

Under Contract No. FA8726-06-C-0005 et al. 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

) 

) 

) ASBCA No. 60445 

) 

) 

Keith L. Baker, Esq. 

Baker, Cronogue, Tolle & Werfel, LLP 

McLean, VA 

E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq. 

DCMA Chief Trial Attorney 

Kara M. Klaas, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

Defense Contract Management Agency 

Chantilly, VA 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

This appeal has settled, and by motion filed on June 20, 2018, appellant moved for 

dismissal of the appeal with prejudice. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed from the Board's 

docket with prejudice. 

Dated: June 25, 2018 

'LJlEIDROUTY 

Administrative Judge 

Vice Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60445, Appeal of ProLogic Inc., 

rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
### §3115. Irrevocable commitment of Federal Government to pay ultimate award when fixed

(a) Requirement for Irrevocable Commitment.—Action under section 3114 of this title irrevocably committing the Federal Government to the payment of the ultimate award shall not be taken unless the head of the executive department or agency or bureau of the Government empowered to acquire the land believes that the ultimate award probably will be within any limits Congress prescribes on the price to be paid.

(b) Authorized Purposes of Expenditures After Irrevocable Commitment Made.—When the Government has taken or may take title to real property during a condemnation proceeding and in advance of final judgment in the proceeding and has become irrevocably committed to pay the amount ultimately to be awarded as compensation, and the Attorney General believes that title to the property has been vested in the Government or that all persons having an interest in the property have been made parties to the proceeding and will be bound by the final judgment, the Government may expend amounts appropriated for that purpose to demolish existing structures on the property and to erect public buildings or public works on the property.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1146.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3115(a) | 40:258c. | Feb. 26, 1931, ch. 307, §3, 46 Stat. 1422. |
| 3115(b) | 40:258e. | Feb. 26, 1931, ch. 307, §5, 46 Stat. 1422; Pub. L. 91–393, §4, Sept. 1, 1970, 84 Stat. 835. |

Section

In subsection (b), the words "possession of" are omitted as unnecessary.
#### Roy Gould, Respondent, v. Churchill L. Kohlman, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Breitel and Bergan, JJ.
### Part J—Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Tuberculosis in Correctional Institutions
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2567 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2567

     To name the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center in 
Minneapolis, Minnesota, as the ``Paul Wellstone Department of Veterans 
                       Affairs Medical Center''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 23, 2003

Ms. McCollum (for herself, Mr. Evans, Mr. Oberstar, Mr. Rodriguez, Mr. 
Ryan of Ohio, Mr. Filner, Ms. Corrine Brown of Florida, Ms. Waters, Mr. 
 Gutierrez, Ms. DeLauro, Mr. Strickland, Mr. Snyder, and Mr. Michaud) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To name the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center in 
Minneapolis, Minnesota, as the ``Paul Wellstone Department of Veterans 
                       Affairs Medical Center''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL 
              CENTER, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA, AS THE PAUL WELLSTONE 
              DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER.

    The Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center located in 
Minneapolis, Minnesota, shall after the date of the enactment of this 
Act be known and designated as the ``Paul Wellstone Department of 
Veterans Affairs Medical Center''. Any reference to such medical center 
in any law, regulation, map, document, or other paper of the United 
States shall be considered to be a reference to the Paul Wellstone 
Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Alurion Realty Corporation, Appellant, against William W. Mills et al., Constituting the Tax Commission of the City of New York, Respondents. [1429-1431 Broadway, Borough of Manhattan.]

— Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3403 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3403

   To repeal the proposed rule of the Agricultural Marketing Service 
relating to the establishment of a Christmas tree promotion, research, 
    and information program and the assessment of fees to fund such 
                                program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 10, 2011

Mr. Walsh of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                    to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To repeal the proposed rule of the Agricultural Marketing Service 
relating to the establishment of a Christmas tree promotion, research, 
    and information program and the assessment of fees to fund such 
                                program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Save Christmas Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ASSESSMENT OF FEES ON CHRISTMAS TREES TO FUND 
              CHRISTMAS TREE PROMOTION, RESEARCH, AND INFORMATION 
              PROGRAM.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the rule submitted by 
the Agricultural Marketing Service of the Department of Agriculture 
relating to the establishment of a Christmas tree promotion, research, 
and information program (published at 76 Federal Register 69094 
(November 8, 2011)) shall have no force or effect and no substantially 
similar rule may be promulgated.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3406 

To restore the rule that agreements between manufacturers and retailers, 

distributors, or wholesalers to set the price below which the manufacturer’s product or service may not be sold violates the Sherman Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2011 

Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia (for himself and Mr. CONYERS) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To restore the rule that agreements between manufacturers 

and retailers, distributors, or wholesalers to set the price 

below which the manufacturer’s product or service may 

not be sold violates the Sherman Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Discount Pricing Con5 sumer Protection Act of 2011’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3406 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON MINIMUM RESALE PRICE MAINTE2 NANCE. 

3 Any agreement setting a price below which a product 

4 or service may not be sold by a retailer, wholesaler, or 

5 distributor shall violate section 1 of the Sherman Act (15 

6 U.S.C. 1). 

7 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

8 This Act shall take effect 90 days after the date of 

9 the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### SUBCHAPTER II—DESIGNATION OF REGIONS
(January 14, 1948.)

#### In the Matter of the Claim of John Pytel, Respondent, against Carborundum Company et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal by the employer and its insurance carrier from an award. The employee is mentally incompetent as the result of the injury. Section 115 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law limits the application of section 25-a of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The award should be affirmed. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Foster and Russell, JJ. [See *post,*p. 924.]
§ 919.345 What happens if I fail to disclose information required under § 919.335? If we later determine that you failed to disclose information under § 919.335 that you knew at the time you entered into the covered transaction, we may— ( a ) Terminate the transaction for material failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the transaction; or
( b ) Pursue any other available remedies, including suspension and debarment.
No. IV-13-007

Contact: Victor Dricks (817) 200-1128

 Lara Uselding (817) 200-1519

 

March 7, 2013 

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS 

FORT CALHOUN NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a public meeting on March 27 to discuss 

the status of the Fort Calhoun nuclear plant’s recovery activities and actions described in the 

recently revised Confirmatory Action Letter (CAL). The plant, located 19 miles north of Omaha, 

Neb., is owned and operated by Omaha Public Power District (OPPD).

The meeting will be held from 6-9 p.m. at the Doubletree Hotel, 1616 Dodge St. 

in Omaha. This meeting is one of a series the NRC is holding to keep the public informed 

about OPPD’s effort to address performance issues. 

On Feb. 26, the NRC issued a revised CAL adding actions that include containment 

internal structural issues, the use of Teflon seals for containment electrical cables, and several 

event reports involving recently identified equipment problems. At the meeting, the NRC staff 

will discuss these action items, results of recently performed NRC inspection activities, and 

future NRC inspections to address the numerous restart action items.

Following NRC and OPPD presentations, the public will have an opportunity to 

ask the NRC questions about Fort Calhoun and the regulator’s oversight activities.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV

 1600 E. Lamar Blvd.

 Arlington, TX 76011-4511

Telephone: (817) 860-8100

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-188-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
No. IV-11-002 

Contact: Victor Dricks: (817) 860-8128 

 Lara Uselding: (817) 276-6519 

 

 January 3, 2011

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD REGULATORY CONFERENCE 

WITH COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a regulatory conference with 

Luminant Generation Co. officials on Jan. 13, to discuss the significance of an inspection finding 

at the Comanche Peak nuclear power plant. The plant is located near Glen Rose, Texas. 

 Conferees will discuss the significance, cause and corrective actions associated with the 

apparent failure by the company to incorporate into station procedures information necessary to 

ensure continued operability of a water tank that supplies safety-related equipment. Specifically, 

an NRC inspection revealed, the company failed to take steps necessary to ensure that a rubberlike bladder inside the tank was properly maintained. 

The meeting, which will be open to public observation, will begin at 1 p.m. in the NRC’s 

Region IV offices in Arlington, Texas. The public will have an opportunity to observe and ask 

questions of NRC staff after the business portion of the meeting. Members of the public can 

listen to the meeting via a special telephone line by calling 1-800-952-9677 and asking to be 

connected to the meeting. 

The NRC evaluates regulatory performance at commercial nuclear power plants with a 

color coded process which classifies regulatory findings as either green, white, yellow or red, in 

increasing order of increasing safety significance. The NRC staff has preliminary determined 

that the significance of the violation is “white,” meaning it has a low to moderate safety 

significance. 

No decision on the final significance, the apparent violations or any contemplated 

enforcement action will be made during the conference. Those decisions will be made by NRC 

officials at a later date. 

 ### 

 

 NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125 

Telephone: (817) 860-8128
#### Mark Sands et al., Individually and Doing Business under the Name of Alloyed Metals Company, Respondents, v. Daniel Klein et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Appeal unanimously dismissed. No opinion. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Breitel and Bergan, JJ.
### SUBCHAPTER VIII—POLICE CORPS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS TRAINING AND EDUCATION
#### § 272.4 Waiver.

The prohibitions set forth in § 272.2 may be waived for any toy, look-alike or imitation firearm that will be used only in the theatrical, movie or television industry. A request for such a waiver should be made, in writing, to the Chief Counsel for NIST, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Mail Stop 1052, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899-1052. The request must include a sworn affidavit which states that the toy, look-alike, or imitation firearm will be used only in the theatrical, movie or television industry. A sample of the item must be included with the request.

[78 FR 4765, Jan. 23, 2013]
### §18302. Definitions

In this chapter, the following definitions apply:

(1) Arbitration.—The term "arbitration"—

(A) means the arbitration of disputes, regarding the terms and conditions of employment, that is required under an interstate compact governing an interstate compact agency operating in the national capital area; but

(B) does not include the interpretation and application of rights arising from an existing collective bargaining agreement.

(2) Arbitrator.—The term "arbitrator" refers to either a single arbitrator, or a board of arbitrators, chosen under applicable procedures.

(3) Interstate compact agency operating in the national capital area.—The term "interstate compact agency operating in the national capital area" means any interstate compact agency that provides public transit services and that was established by an interstate compact to which the District of Columbia is a signatory.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1292.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 18302 | 40:1302(1), (2), (4), (5). | Pub. L. 104–50, title IV, §403(1), (2), (4), (5), Nov. 15, 1995, 109 Stat. 464. |

Section

The text of 40:1302(4) and (5) is combined to eliminate unnecessary words.
### **CHAPTER 109B—SECURE WATER**

Sec.
10361.
Findings.
10362.
Definitions.
10363.
Reclamation climate change and water program.
10364.
Water management improvement.
10365.
Hydroelectric power assessment.
10366.
Climate change and water intragovernmental panel.
10367.
Water data enhancement by United States Geological Survey.
10368.
National water availability and use assessment program.
10369.
Research agreement authority.
10370.
Effect.
10371.
Water prediction and forecasting.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Energy information directory.**
 
1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2001
 
SuDoc Number:E 3.33:
Item Number:0435-E-08 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000568140
 
February 6, 2020
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Wniteb ~tate~ ~ourt of ~peaI~

for tbe jfeberaI (!Circuit

IN RE VEGAS AMUSEMENT, INC.

2012-1279

(Reexamination No. 90/011,023)

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark

Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.

ON MOTION

Before DYK, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Vegas Amusement, Inc. moves without opposition for

the court to take judicial notice of certain documents

available online and cited in its reply brief before the Board

of Patent Appeals and Interferences. Judicial notice may

be appropriate with respect to certain documents outside of

the record. However, the relevance ofsuch materials is left

to.the discretion ofthe merits panel.

Accordingly,

IT Is ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted.

Case: 12-1279 Document: 30 Page: 1 Filed: 09/28/2012
IN RE VEGAS AMUSEMENT, INC.

(2) A copy ofthis order shall be transmitted to the

merits panel assigned to hear this case.

FOR THE COURT

2

SEP 282012

Date

cc: Michael Dergosits, Esq.

Raymond T. Chen, Esq.

s26

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

u.a.cauwft~FOR

THE FEDERAL ClRCutT

SEP 282012

.W4 tlllBALV

WRK

Case: 12-1279 Document: 30 Page: 2 Filed: 09/28/2012
### §153503. Membership

(a) Eligibility.—Except as provided in this chapter, eligibility for membership in the corporation and the rights and privileges of members are as provided in the constitution and bylaws of the corporation.

(b) Voting.—Each member (except an honorary or associate member) has one vote on each matter submitted to a vote at a meeting of the members.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1425.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 153503 | 36:4608. | Aug. 19, 1964, Pub. L. 88–449, §8, 78 Stat. 498. |

Section
#### § 970.213 Amendment to an application.

After an application has been submitted to the Administrator, but before a determination is made on the issuance or transfer of a license, the applicant must submit an amendment to the application if required by a significant change in the circumstances represented in the original application and affecting the requirements of this subpart. Applicants should consult with NOAA to determine if changes in circumstances are sufficiently significant to require submission of an amendment. The application, as amended, would then serve as the basis for determinations by the Administrator under this part. For each amendment judged by the Administrator to be significant, he will provide a copy of such amendment to each other Federal agency and department which received a copy of the original application, and also will provide for public notice, hearing and comment on the amendment pursuant to § 970.212. Such amendment, however, will not affect the priority of right established by the filing of the original application. After the issuance of or transfer of a license, any revision by the licensee will be made pursuant to § 970.513.