alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The United States Department of the Navy (Navy), announces its decision to construct and operate a Service Pier Extension (SPE) and associated support facilities in Hood Canal on the waterfront of Naval Base (NAVBASE) Kitsap Bangor, Washington (WA). The Navy will implement Alternative 2, short pier configuration, which is the preferred alternative in the October 2018 Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) for the Land-Water Interface (LWI) and SPE, NAVBASE Kitsap Bangor, WA. The Alternative 2 short pier configuration is also the environmentally preferred alternative and will fully meet the Navy's purpose and need for the proposed action.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The existing Service Pier will be extended by 520 feet and will require in-water as well as upland construction of                           ( print page 678)                        associated facilities to provide additional maintenance berthing capacity and improve associated support facilities for existing homeported and visiting submarines at NAVBASE Kitsap Bangor. The complete text of the Record of Decision (ROD) for the LWI and SPE SEIS is available on the project website at                     *http://www.nbkeis.com/​SEIS.aspx*, along with the October 2018 Final SEIS for LWI and SPE, NAVBASE Kitsap Bangor, WA. Single copies of the ROD are available upon request by contacting: Naval Facilities Engineering Command Northwest, Attn: Ms. Kimberly Kler (LWI and SPE SEIS Program Manager), 1101 Tautog Circle, Silverdale, WA 98315-1101.                

Dated: January 28, 2019.

M.S. Werner,

Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2019-00372 Filed 1-30-19; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
Exhibit
      32.1








CERTIFICATION
      OF PERIODIC REPORT


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I,
      Mathew
      G. Rule, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
      Denali Concrete Management, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the
      best
      of my knowledge:




(1)
            the
                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter
                ended
                March 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                U.S.C.
                78m or 78 o(d)); and




(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








Date:  May
      14, 2008     /s/
      Mathew G. Rule


Mathew
      G.
      Rule


President,
      Chief Executive
      Officer and


Chief
      Financial
      Officer






A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act has been furnished to Denali Concrete Management, Inc. and will be retained
      by Denali Concrete Management, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
### §528. Utilization of excess furniture

A department or agency of the Federal Government may not use amounts provided by law to purchase furniture if the Administrator of General Services determines that requirements can reasonably be met by transferring excess furniture, including rehabilitated furniture, from other departments or agencies pursuant to this subtitle.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1086.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 528 | 40:483b. | Aug. 7, 1953, ch. 340, §1316, 67 Stat. 439. |

Section

The words "Notwithstanding the provisions of any other law" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "may not use funds provided by law to purchase furniture" are substituted for "no funds shall be available in this or any other Act for the purchase of furniture" for clarity and to eliminate unnecessary words.
### §547. Agricultural commodities, foods, and cotton or woolen goods

(a) Policies.—The Administrator of General Services shall consult with the Secretary of Agriculture to formulate policies for the disposal of surplus agricultural commodities, surplus foods processed from agricultural commodities, and surplus cotton or woolen goods. The policies shall be formulated to prevent surplus agricultural commodities, or surplus foods processed from agricultural commodities, from being dumped on the market in a disorderly manner and disrupting the market prices for agricultural commodities.

(b) Transfers to Department of Agriculture.—

(1) In general.—The Administrator shall transfer without charge to the Department of Agriculture any surplus agricultural commodities, foods, and cotton or woolen goods for disposal, when the Secretary determines that a transfer is necessary for the Secretary to carry out responsibilities for price support or stabilization.

(2) Deposit of receipts.—Receipts resulting from disposal by the Department under this subsection shall be deposited pursuant to any authority available to the Secretary. When applicable, however, net proceeds from the sale of surplus property transferred under this subsection shall be credited pursuant to section 572(a) of this title.

(3) Limitation of sales.—Surplus farm commodities transferred under this subsection may not be sold, other than for export, in quantities exceeding, or at prices less than, the applicable quantities and prices for sales of those commodities by the Commodity Credit Corporation.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1089.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 547(a) | 40:484(g). | June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title II, §203(g), (h), 63 Stat. 386. |
| 547(b) | 40:484(h). | |

Section
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 7616

COREY E. JOHNSON , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. BUTLER LAW FIRM , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. Henry E. Hudson , District Judge. ( 3:17

- cv - 00033

- HEH

- RCY )

Submitted : February 22, 2018 Decided: February 27, 2018

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Corey E. Johnson , Appellant Pro Se

. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Corey E. Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition as successive . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a con stitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional clai ms is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Johnson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly , we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISS ED
§ 9301.13 Rules for determining if an individual is the subject of a record. ( a ) Individuals desiring to know if a specific system of records maintained by SIGAR contains a record pertaining to them should address their inquiries to the Privacy Officer, Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, 2530 Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA 22202. As there may be delays in mail delivery, it is advisable to send the request via facsimile to (703) 601-3804 or by email to *sigar.pentagon.gen-coun.mbx.privacy@mail.mil .* The written inquiry should contain a specific reference to the system of records maintained by the SIGAR listed in the SIGAR Notice of Systems of Records, or it should describe the type of record in sufficient detail reasonably to identify the system of records. Notice of SIGAR systems of records subject to the Privacy Act will be published in the Federal Register, posted on the SIGAR public facing Web site, and copies of the notices will be available upon request to the Privacy Officer when so published. A compilation of such notices will also be made and published by the Office of the Federal Register, in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552a(f).
( b ) At a minimum, the request should contain sufficient identifying information to allow SIGAR to determine if there is a record pertaining to the individual making the request in a particular system of records. In instances when the requester's identification is insufficient to ensure disclosure to the individual to whom the information pertains in view of the sensitivity of the information, SIGAR reserves the right to solicit from the person requesting access to a record additional identifying information.
( c ) Ordinarily the person requesting will be informed whether the named system of records contains a record pertaining to such person within 10 days of such a request (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and legal Federal holidays). Such a response will also contain or reference the procedures which must be followed by the individual making the request in order to gain access to the record.
( d ) Whenever a response cannot be made within the 10 days, the Privacy Officer will inform the person making the request the reasons for the delay and the date on which a response may be anticipated.
### §3706. Escrow of deposits and downpayments

(a) Any deposit or downpayment made by an eligible veteran in connection with the purchase of proposed or newly constructed and previously unoccupied residential property in a project on which the Secretary has issued a Certificate of Reasonable Value, which purchase is to be financed with a loan guaranteed, insured, or made under the provisions of this chapter, shall be deposited forthwith by the seller, or the agent of the seller, receiving such deposit or payment, in a trust account to safeguard such deposit or payment from the claims of creditors of the seller. The failure of the seller or the seller's agent to create such trust account and to maintain it until the deposit or payment has been disbursed for the benefit of the veteran purchaser at settlement or, if the transaction does not materialize, is otherwise disposed of in accordance with the terms of the contract, may constitute an unfair marketing practice within the meaning of section 3704(b) of this title.

(b) If an eligible veteran contracts for the construction of a property in a project on which the Secretary has issued a Certificate of Reasonable Value and such construction is to be financed with the assistance of a construction loan to be guaranteed, insured, or made under the provisions of this chapter, it may be considered an unfair marketing practice under section 3704(b) of this title if any deposit or downpayment of the veteran is not maintained in a special trust account by the recipient until it is either (1) applied on behalf of the veteran to the cost of the land or to the cost of construction or (2), if the transaction does not materialize, is otherwise disposed of in accordance with the terms of the contract.

(Added Pub. L. 86–665, §6(a), July 14, 1960, 74 Stat. 532, §1806; amended Pub. L. 94–324, §7(10), June 30, 1976, 90 Stat. 721; Pub. L. 101–237, title III, §313(b)(1), Dec. 18, 1989, 103 Stat. 2077; renumbered §3706 and amended Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), (c)(1), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 406; Pub. L. 103–446, title XII, §1201(e)(13), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4685.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–446, which directed the substitution of "of this title" for "of this chapter" the second and third places appearing, was executed by making the substitution the second and fourth places appearing to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

1991—Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), renumbered section 1806 of this title as this section.

Pub. L. 102–83, §5(c)(1), substituted "3704(b)" for "1804(b)" in subsecs. (a) and (b).

1989—Pub. L. 101–237 substituted "Secretary" for "Administrator" wherever appearing.

1976—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 94–324 substituted "the seller's" for "his".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1976 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 94–324 effective June 30, 1976, see section 9(a) of Pub. L. 94–324, set out as a note under section 3701 of this title.
Exhibit 32.1    Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Western Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc. (the Company) for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Steven P. Grimes Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company and James W. Kleifges as Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge: (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Steven P. GrimesName:Steven P. GrimesChief Executive Officer, President 
Chief Financial Officer and TreasurerDate:November 10, 2010/s/ James W. KleifgesName:James W. KleifgesChief Accounting OfficerDate:November 10, 2010
November 30, 2015 

Dear Mr. Huard: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket 

No. FAA−2015−3425). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) to process your petition. 

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) 

which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to 

proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation 

please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below. 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov. Once your information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the 

requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comment tracking 

number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process 

your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 12/15/15. If we do 

not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999. 

Sincerely, 

/S/ 

Program Analyst
•

RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 60

Amendment to Requirements for Hazardous Waste

Incinerator Permits

54 FR 4286-4288

January 30, 1989

(non-HSWA Cluster V)

In lieu of making the changes addressed by this checklist, a State may submit a

certification by the State Attorney General that he/she interprets his/her State's

existing regulations in the manner described in this rule. Such a simplified

application is allowed because EPA is only clarifying current regulatory language,

and the Agency assumes that these requirements are already in effect in most States.

If a State Attorney General cannot certify that he/she interprets his/her State's

existing regulations in the manner described in this rule, the State's regulations

must be amended to reflect this clarification.

STATE ANALOG IS:

FEDERAL

REQUIREMENT

FEDERAL

RCRA

CITATION

ANALOGOUS

STATE

CITATION

EQUIVALENT

MORE BROADSTRIN- ER IN

GENT SCOPE

•

PART 270 - EPA ADMINISTERED PERMIT PROGRAMS: THE

HAZARDOUS WASTE PERMIT PROGRAM

SUBPART F - SPECIAL FORMS OF PERMITS

HAZARDOUS WASTE INCINERATOR PERMITS WAC 173-303

• January 30, 1989 - Page 1 of 2
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 60: Amendment to Requirements for Hazardous

Waste Incinerator Permits (cont'd)

STATE ANALOG •

FEDERAL

REQUIREMENT

FEDERAL

RCRA

CITATION

ANALOGOUS

STATE.

CITATION

EQUIVALENT

MORE

STRINGENT

IS:

BROADER IN

SCOPE

,

•

after "permit," replace

"to" with "for"; after

"incinerate," replace

"may" with "must";

after "in accordance

with," insert

"§270.19(b) and";

before "(9)" insert

"(b)"; after

"section," add clause

regarding information

in §270.19(c) and a

sentence regarding

exemption from

§264.343 and 264.345;

after "trial burn

results" add sentence

regarding submission

of trail burn

results prior to permit

issuance; in last

sentence replace "if"

with "when"; change

requirements so that

the director specifies

a time period prior to

permit issuance in

which the trial burn

must be submitted 270.62(d) -807(10) x

• January 30, 1989 -Page 2 of 2
### **CHAPTER 33—ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION, AND ALTERATION**

Sec.
3301.
Definitions and nonapplication.
3302.
Prohibition on construction of buildings except by Administrator of General Services.
3303.
Continuing investigation and survey of public buildings.
3304.
Acquisition of buildings and sites.
3305.
Construction and alteration of buildings.
3306.
Accommodating federal agencies.
3307.
Congressional approval of proposed projects.
3308.
Architectural or engineering services.
3309.
Buildings and sites in the District of Columbia.
3310.
Special rules for leased buildings.
3311.
State administration of criminal and health and safety laws.
3312.
Compliance with nationally recognized codes.
3313.
Procurement of life-cycle cost effective and energy efficient lighting systems.
3314.
Baby changing facilities in restrooms.
3315.
Delegation.
3316.
Report to Congress.
3317.
Certain authority not affected.
3318. 1
Lactation room in public buildings.

3318. 1
Availability of Federal building project information.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2022**—Pub. L. 117–202, §3(b), Oct. 17, 2022, 136 Stat. 2226, added item 3313 and struck out former item 3313 "Use of energy efficient lighting fixtures and bulbs".

**2021**—Pub. L. 116–333, §2(b), Jan. 13, 2021, 134 Stat. 5114, which directed adding item 3318, relating to availability of Federal building project information, to the table of chapters for chapter 33, was executed by adding it to the table of sections for chapter 33, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

**2019**—Pub. L. 116–30, §2(b), July 25, 2019, 133 Stat. 1033, which directed adding item 3318, relating to lactation room in public buildings, after item 3316, was executed by adding it after item 3317, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

**2016**—Pub. L. 114–235, §2(b), Oct. 7, 2016, 130 Stat. 965, added items 3314 to 3317 and struck out former items 3314 "Delegation", 3315 "Report to Congress", and 3316 "Certain authority not affected".

**2007**—Pub. L. 110–140, title III, §323(c)(2), Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1591, added items 3313 to 3316 and struck out former items 3313 "Delegation", 3314 "Report to Congress", and 3315 "Certain authority not affected".

1  So in original. Two sections 3318 have been enacted.
COURT OF APPEALS

SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO

MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

To the 108th District Court of Potter County, Greeting:

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, on March 31,

2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Travon La Shae Ginn v. The State of Texas

Case Number: 07-14-00118-CR Trial Court Number: 66,042-E

was determined and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated March 31, 2015, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of said Court of

Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Honorable Justices of our said Court, with the seal thereof

annexed, at the City of Amarillo on November 5, 2015.

Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

FILE COPY
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marco Community Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, E. Terry Skone, Acting Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of and for the period covered by the Report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                                   
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------
|Date: September 27, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ E. Terry Skone                
|                         |  |  |  |     |  | E. Terry Skone                    
|                         |  |  |  |     |  | Acting Principal Financial Officer