alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Cc:

From: Sent: To:

Subject: Attachments: 

# ,. . '.{iii:ENTOF Faulk, Scott 

### (OSJ)""DT.IT''''''



## -~:;fZET OPERAtIO,~~

. Faulk,Scott (OSn 

## lJI4 MAY2 Wednesday, May28,201412:30 PM
.. .



## q 

## A <f. !8~ckley';'BeckleyAirport Manager'; 'Clarksburg'; 'Greenbrier'; 'Greenbrier Airport

Manager'; 'Mayor ofMorgantown'; 'Morgantown'; 'Morgantown 2'; 'Morgantown 3'; 'Staunton'; 'Staunton 2'; 'Staunton 3'; 'Staunton 4'; 'Staunton 5'; 'Staunton 6';'Staunton 7'; 'Staunton AirportManager'; jmarhefka@cityofmorgantown.org' Shawn Simpson <shawn@boutiqueair.com> (shawn@boutiqueair.com); 'DaveHackett'; 'Joshua Garth Newsteder'; Jamie Kogutek (Jamie.Kogutek@silverairways.com);Gormas, Michael(OSn; Martin,Michael(OSn; Schlemmer, Kevin(OSn RevisedEASProposals for YourReview Boutique Air.pdt;CityLinkAir at Beckleyand Jamestown.pdf; CityLinkAir at Clarksburg.pdf; CityLinkAir EASat Greenbrier.pdf; CityLinkAir EASat Morgantown.pdf; Silver. pdf; SunAirProposal.pdf.
Greetings All, Iwould like to update you on the Essential Air Service (EAS) situation at GreenbrierlWhite Sulphur Springs, Beckley, ClarksburglFainnont, and Morgantown, West Virginia; and Staunton, Virginia, as well as give you an opportunity to offer any comments on the record before we submit a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs. As you know, by Order 

### 2014-2-13, issued on February 

### 19,2014, the Department requesting proposals from air carriers interested in providing EAS at the above communities for a new term. In response to our request,. Silver Airways, Boutique Air, City Link Air, and Sun Air submitted proposals for consideration. However, the Department received multiple requests from air carriers asking that they be allowed to modify their proposals at some or all of the communities. We reviewed those requests and found itto be in the public interest to grant those requests. Therefore, the air carriers that submitted proposals in response to the most recent Request for Proposals had until May 

### 27, 2014, to submit arevised proposal, ifthey wished to do so. Ihave attached each air carrier's revised proposal for your review and I expect them to be uploaded on www.re!!ulations.!!ov sometime today, Irequest that you review the proposals and submit any comments you may have as soon as possible, but no later than Thursday, June 

### J9,2014. Please send your comments directly to scott.faulkiOldot.!!ov. Also, please forward this to all relevant parties that 

### J have not included on the distribution list. Feel free to contact mc ifyou have any questions. Kind Regards, Scott Faulk Transportation Industry Analyst U.S. Department of Transp.ortation Office of Aviation Analysis EAS 

### & Domestic Analysis Division 

### 1200New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 

### 20590 202-366-9721

1
### §6114. Oliver Wendell Holmes Garden

The Architect of the Capitol shall maintain and care for the Oliver Wendell Holmes Garden in accordance with the provisions of law on the maintenance and care of the grounds of the Supreme Court Building.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1181.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6114 | 40:13e. | Oct. 22, 1940, ch. 908, §6, 54 Stat. 1208. |

Section

The words "After the completion and dedication of" are omitted as executed.
### **CHAPTER 147—MISCELLANEOUS**

Sec.
14701.
Applicable labor standards.
14702.
Nondiscrimination.
14703.
Authorization of appropriations.
14704.
Termination.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

DANNY A. HOGAN, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-1743

)

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL )

TRUST COMPANY, as trustee, )

in trust for THE REGISTERED )

HOLDERS OF MORGAN STANLEY )

ABS CAPITAL I TRUST 2004-NC2, )

MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH )

CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2004-NC2; )

THE LITTLE MERMAID )

CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION )

INC.; and UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF )

DANNY A. HOGAN, )

)

Appellees. )

)

Opinion filed August 24, 2018. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Collier County; Christine Greider, 

Judge.

James R. Ackley of Law Offices of 

James R. Ackley, P.A., West Palm 

Beach, for Appellant. 

Joseph T. Kohn and Benjamin B. 

Brown of Quarles & Brady LLP, 

Naples, for Appellee Deutsche Bank 

National Trust Company.
- 2 -

No appearance for remaining 

Appellees. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, BLACK, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
----

 

Exhibit 31

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Brian Smith, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB ofBeeston Enterprises Ltd. for the quarter ended March 31, 2005;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport.

4. The registrant's other certifying offering officers and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for theregistrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of thisquarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and c) presented in this quarterlyreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors andthe audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies in the design oroperation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant'sability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and haveidentified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internalcontrols; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internalcontrols; and 

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I haveindicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changesin internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affectinternal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.

 

 

Date:  May 4, 2005                           

 

***/s/ Brian Smith                               ***

Brian Smith

President, CEO

----
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3378 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3378

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 220 Elm Avenue in Munising, Michigan, as the ``Elizabeth L. Kinnunen 
                        Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 4, 2011

  Mr. Benishek (for himself, Mr. Huizenga of Michigan, Mr. Camp, Mr. 
 Kildee, Mr. Upton, Mr. Walberg, Mr. Rogers of Michigan, Mr. Clarke of 
 Michigan, and Mr. McCotter) introduced the following bill; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 220 Elm Avenue in Munising, Michigan, as the ``Elizabeth L. Kinnunen 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIZABETH L. KINNUNEN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 220 Elm Avenue in Munising, Michigan, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Elizabeth L. Kinnunen Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Elizabeth 
L. Kinnunen Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
U.S .. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

. GREAT LAKES AVIATION, LTD 

FAA DOCKET No. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS FAA-2011-0672 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

On June 30, 2011, the Federal AviationAdministration (hereinafter "Complainant") filed 

a Complaint. Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. (hereinafter "Respondent") had earlier requested a 

hearing. By letter dated October 18, 2012, Respondent filed a Withdrawal of Request for 

Hearing, citing settlement of the matter. 

14 C.F.R. §·13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency attorney 

. may withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing without the 

consent of the administrative law judge. If an agency attorney withdraws the complaint or 

a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the answer, the administrative law judge 

shall dismiss the proceedings under this subpart with prejudice." 

WHEREFORE, the within filed Withdrawal of Request for Hearing having been read and 

considered, it is ORDERED that: · 
2 

1. Respondent's Withdrawal of Request for Hearing is hereby GRANTED; and 

2. This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

Attachments - Service List 

{l;duJC.~~ Richard C. Goodwin ~ 

Administrative Law Judge 
-3-

SERVICE LIST 

FDMS No. FAA-2011-0672 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY . 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGCA30 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 

ONE COPY 

Timothy R. Thornton, Respondent's Counsel 

Briggs and Morgan, P.A. 

2200 IDS Center 

80 South 8th Street 

Minneapolis, MN 55402-2157 

TEL: 612-977-8400 

FAJ(: 612-977-8650 

Kyle Lomazow, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue, SW. 

Renton, W A 98057 

TEL: 425-227-1847 

FAJ(: 425-227-1007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department ofTransportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAJ(: 202-366-7536 

1 Service was by U.S. M:iit For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S. W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 

2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
EXHIBIT 3.2

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                                  I-TRAX, INC.

         I-trax, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue
of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "Corporation"),

         DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

         FIRST: That the Board of Directors adopted a resolution setting forth a
proposed amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of said Corporation and
declaring said amendment advisable and directing that said amendment be
submitted to the stockholders of said Corporation entitled to vote in respect
thereof for their approval. The resolution setting forth said amendment is as
follows:

                  RESOLVED, that the Certificate of Incorporation of the
         Corporation be amended by replacing the first sentence of the FOURTH
         Article thereof so that such sentence shall be and read as follows:

                           "The total number of shares of stock which the
                  Corporation shall have authority to issue is 102,000,000
                  shares, of which (i) 100,000,000 shares are designated as
                  Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share, and (ii) 2,000,000
                  shares are designated as Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value per
                  share."

         SECOND: That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board of
Directors, an annual meeting of the stockholders of said corporation was duly
called and held, upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware at which meeting the necessary number
of shares as required by statute were voted in favor of the amendment.

         THIRD: That thereafter said amendment was duly adopted in accordance
with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State
of Delaware.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to
be signed by the Chief Executive Officer and the Secretary of the Corporation
this 24th day of May, 2001.

                                            I-TRAX, INC.


                                            By: /s/ Frank A. Martin
                                                     Frank A. Martin
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40659 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus NDUBUIZU M. MBADIWE, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6-95-CR-58-1

- - - - - - - - - - February 24, 1997 Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Ndubuizu M. Mbadiwe appeals his conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine with the intent to dristibute. He argues that the district court should have granted his motion to suppress evidence Mbadiwe argues that the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress the cocaine that was discovered during a search of his car because: 1) his detention exceeded the scope of the traffic stop, making the delay unreasonable;No. 96-40659 - 2 - 2) his consent to search was not voluntarily given; and 3) the search was illegal because it was conducted without a warrant. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government, the district court did not err by denying Mbadiwe’s motion to suppress evidence. See United States v. Ponce , 8 F.3d 989, 995 (5th Cir. 1993).
AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3412 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3412

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 29, 2012

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 1421 Veterans Memorial Drive in Abbeville, Louisiana, as the 
      ``Sergeant Richard Franklin Abshire Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SERGEANT RICHARD FRANKLIN ABSHIRE POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1421 Veterans Memorial Drive in Abbeville, Louisiana, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Sergeant Richard Franklin Abshire Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
Richard Franklin Abshire Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 28, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 904.505 Summary sale. ( a ) In view of the perishable nature of fish, any person authorized to enforce a statute administered by NOAA may, as authorized by law, sell or cause to be sold, and any person may purchase, for not less than its domestic fair market value, fish seized under such statute.
( b ) Any person purchasing fish subject to this section must deliver the proceeds of the sale to a person authorized to enforce a statute administered by NOAA immediately upon request of such authorized person. Anyone who does not so deliver the proceeds may be subject to penalties under the applicable statute or statutes.
( c ) NOAA will serve the Notice of the Summary Sale on the owner or consignee, if known or easily ascertainable, or to any other party that the facts of record indicate has an interest in the seized fish, unless the owner or consignee or other interested party has otherwise been personally notified. Notice will be sent either prior to the sale, or as soon thereafter as practicable.
( d ) The proceeds of the sale, after deducting any reasonable costs of the sale, will be subject to any administrative or judicial proceedings in the same manner as the seized fish would have been, including an action in rem for the forfeiture of the proceeds. Pending disposition of such proceedings, the proceeds will, as appropriate, either be deposited in a NOAA suspense account or submitted to the appropriate court.
( e ) Seizure and sale of fish is without prejudice to any other remedy or sanction authorized by law.
[71 FR 12448, Mar. 10, 2006, as amended at 87 FR 38942, June 30, 2022]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 23, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 68153]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25902]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commerical property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel NIAID AIDS Training Grant.
    Date: December 14, 2004.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge 6700, 6700B 
Rockledge Drive, 3145, Bethesda, MD 20817, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Geetha P. Bansal, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NIAID/NIH/DHHS, Room 3145, 6700-B Rockledge Drive, MSC 
7616, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 402-5658, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#284f4a49465b494468464149414c06464140064f475e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fd9a9f9c938e9c91bd93949c9499d3939495d39a928b">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 15, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-25902 Filed 11-22-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 10.4

AMENDMENT TO TRADESTATION GROUP, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK

PURCHASE PLAN

AMENDMENT, dated December 16, 2005, to TRADESTATION GROUP, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN, assumed and adopted by TradeStation
Group, Inc. pursuant to that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization dated January 19, 2000, for which a registration statement on Form S-8 was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 5, 2001 (the
Plan).

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of TradeStation Group, Inc., at a meeting held December 13, 2005,
authorized and directed that the Purchase Price definition in the Plan be amended.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as
follows:



| | 1. | Purchase Price. Effective for all future Offering Periods under the Plan, beginning with the Offering Period that commences January 1, 2006, the definition of
Purchase Price under the Plan shall be as follows:
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Purchase Price shall mean an amount equal to eighty-five
percent (85%) of the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the Exercise Date, rounded up to the nearest One Cent ($0.01).



| | 2. | Capitalized Terms. Capitalized terms used herein, which are not herein defined, shall have the respective meanings ascribed to them in the Plan.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | No Other Amendments. Except as set forth in this Amendment, the Plan remains unmodified and of full force and effect.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Plan has been amended as herein set forth on the date first above written.



TRADESTATION GROUP, INC.By:

/s/ Marc J. StoneMarc J. Stone, General Counsel
400 P.2d 480

#### STATE of New Mexico ex rel. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF VAUGHN MUNICIPAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 33, Relator, v. The Honorable J. V. GALLEGOS, Judge by Designation for the Fourth Judicial District, County of Guadalupe, State of New Mexico, Respondent.

No. 7831.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

April 7, 1965.

CARMODY, Chief Justice, and CHAVEZ, NOBLE, MOISE and COMPTON, Justices, sitting:

Ordered that said motion that the alternative writ of prohibition heretofore issued herein be made absolute be and the same is hereby denied.

Further Ordered that said motion that the alternative writ of prohibition heretofore issued herein be quashed be and the same is hereby granted.

Now, therefore, it is ordered that the alternative writ of prohibition heretofore issued herein on March 11, 1965 be and the same is hereby quashed and set aside.