alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 930.3 Review of the implementation of the federal consistency requirement.

As part of the responsibility to conduct a continuing review of approved management programs, the Director of the Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management (Director) shall review the performance of each State's implementation of the federal consistency requirement. The Director shall evaluate instances where a State agency is believed to have either failed to object to inconsistent federal actions, or improperly objected to consistent federal actions. This evaluation shall be incorporated within the Director's general efforts to ascertain instances where a State has not adhered to its approved management program and such lack of adherence is not justified.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-11-0054 - Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment for Calendar Year 2010

Accession Number: ML110590458

Date Released: Thursday, April 21, 2022

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML110550749 - SECY-11-0054 - Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment for Calendar Year 2010 (9 page(s), 4/8/2011)
    - ML110550735 - SECY-11-0054 - Enclosure 1: Reactor Oversight Process Program Area Evaluations (8 page(s), 4/8/2011)
    - ML110530220 - SECY-11-0054 - Enclosure 2: Regulatory Impact Summary (2 page(s), 4/8/2011)
    - ML110590436 - SECY-11-0054 - Enclosure 3: Reactor Oversight Process Resources (2 page(s), 4/8/2011)
    - ML110530196 - SECY-11-0054 - Enclosure 4: Resident Inspector Demographics (11 page(s), 4/8/2011)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### § 4a.3 Classification levels.

Information may be classified as national security information by a designated original classifier of the Department if it is determined the information concerns one or more of the categories described in section 1.4 of E.O. 13526. The levels established in section 1.2 of E.O. 13526 (Top Secret, Secret, and Confidential) are the only terms that may be applied to national security information. Except as provided by statute, no other terms shall be used within the Department for the three classification levels.

[85 FR 35375, June 10, 2020]
NRC PUBLIC MEETING APRIL 24 TO DISCUSS DECOMMISSIONING OF

KEWAUNEE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT IN WISCONSIN

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a public meeting April 24 to discuss and 

receive public comment on Dominion Energy Kewaunee’s plan to shut down and decommission 

the Kewaunee nuclear power plant.

The meeting will be held from 7-9 p.m. at the Kewaunee City Council Chambers, 401 

Fifth St. in Kewaunee, Wis. NRC staff members will discuss the regulatory process for 

decommissioning a nuclear power plant as well as Dominion’s plans for the Kewaunee facility.

Kewaunee Power Station is a pressurized water reactor located 27 miles southeast of 

Green Bay. The plant began commercial operation in June 1974. On Feb. 25, 2013, Dominion 

notified the NRC of its plan to cease operation on May 7. This was the first of two formal 

certifications that initiate the decommissioning process. Once the plant ceases operation and 

Dominion certifies that the fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor, the operating 

license will no longer authorize operation of the plant. The license will remain in effect until 

Dominion completes the decommissioning process and the NRC notifies the company that the 

license has been terminated.

Dominion’s Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report for Kewaunee is 

available in the NRC’s online ADAMS document database at accession number ML13063A248.

Information about the Kewaunee plant and the decommissioning process are available on the 

NRC website. 

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 13-027 April 15, 2013
EXHIBIT 32.2  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") by Gold Horse International, Inc. (the "Registrant"), I, Adam Wasserman, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of Registrant.  /s/ Adam WassermanAdam WassermanChief Financial Officer, principal financial and accounting officer  Dated: September 28, 2011   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. II-10-066 September 23, 2010

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416

NRC SCHEDULES MEETING IN VIDALIA 

TO DISCUSS HATCH NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a public meeting in Vidalia, 

Ga., for Wednesday, Sept. 29 to discuss corrective actions associated with two previously issued 

white inspection findings at the Hatch nuclear power plant, located about 20 miles south of 

Vidalia near Baxley, Ga., and operated by Southern Nuclear Operating Company.

The meeting is scheduled to begin at 6:30 p.m. (EDT) in the executive conference room 

at Southeastern Technical College, 3301 E. First St. in Vidalia.

The meeting is called a regulatory performance meeting and the discussion will focus on 

corrective actions associated with the two white findings, one dealing with the failure of a 

coupling on one of the emergency diesel generators and the other related to the failure to 

establish appropriate preventive maintenance for some electronic components, which also 

affected the reliability of the diesel generators. Emergency diesel generators provide back-up 

power for plant safety systems if off-site power is lost. 

Members of the public may attend and NRC officials will be available to answer 

questions after the business portion of the meeting.

Under the NRC reactor oversight process, inspection findings are evaluated using a 

significance determination process and assigned a color indicating its safety significance. 

Findings with very low safety significance are labeled "green." "White" findings have low to 

moderate safety significance, "yellow" findings have substantial safety significance, and "red" 

findings have high safety significance. Inspection findings with higher safety significance than 

“green” prompt the NRC to increase oversight and inspection.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave. NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
§ 970.603 Conservation of resources. ( a ) With respect to the exploration phase of seabed mining, the requirement for the conservation of natural resources, encompassing due regard for the prevention of waste and the future opportunity for the commercial recovery of the unrecovered balance of the hard mineral resources in the area to which the license applies, may not be particularly relevant. Thus, since the Act requires such terms, conditions and restrictions only as needed, exploration licenses will require such provisions only as the Administrator deems necessary.
( b ) NOAA views license phase mining system tests as an opportunity to examine, with industry, the conservation implications of any mining patterns used. Thus, in order to develop information needed for future decisions during commercial recovery, NOAA will include with a license a requirement for the submission of collector track and nodule production data. Only if information submitted reflects that the integrated system tests are resulting in undue waste or threatening the future opportunity for commercial recovery of the unrecovered balance of hard mineral resources will the Administrator modify the terms, conditions or restrictions pertaining to the conservation of natural resources, in order to address such problems.
( c ) If the Administrator so modifies such terms, conditions and restrictions relating to conservation of resources, he will employ a balancing process in the consideration of the state of the technology being developed, the processing system utilized and the value and potential use of any waste, the environmental effects of the exploration activities, economic and resource data, and the national need for hard mineral resources.
###### Editorial Note on Part 8b

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 8b appear at 68 FR 51353, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 8b.15 Employment on ships.

No qualified handicapped individual possessing an appropriate license or certificate obtained from the United States Coast Guard pursuant to the requirements of 46 CFR 10.01-1 *et seq.* and 12.01-1 *et seq.* shall, on the basis of handicap, be subjected to discrimination in employment on ships under any program or activity to which this part applies.
### §556. Disposal of dredge vessels

(a) In General.—The Administrator of General Services, pursuant to sections 521 through 527, 529, and 549 of this title, may dispose of a United States Army Corps of Engineers vessel used for dredging, together with related equipment owned by the Federal Government and under the control of the Chief of Engineers, if the Secretary of the Army declares the vessel to be in excess of federal needs.

(b) Recipients and Purposes.—Disposal under this section is accomplished—

(1) through sale or lease to—

(A) a foreign government as part of a Corps of Engineers technical assistance program;

(B) a federal or state maritime academy for training purposes; or

(C) a non-federal public body for scientific, educational, or cultural purposes; or

(2) through sale solely for scrap to foreign or domestic interests.

(c) No Dredging Activities.—A vessel described in subsection (a) shall not be disposed of under any law for the purpose of engaging in dredging activities within the United States.

(d) Deposit of Amounts Collected.—Amounts collected from the sale or lease of a vessel or equipment under this section shall be deposited into the revolving fund authorized by section 101 (9th par.) of the Civil Functions Appropriation 1 Act, 1954 (33 U.S.C. 576), to be available, as provided in appropriation laws, for the operation and maintenance of vessels under the control of the Corps of Engineers.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1102.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 556 | 40:483d. | Pub. L. 99–662, title IX, §945, Nov. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 4200. |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "U.S. Army Corps of Engineers" are substituted for "Corps of Engineers" for clarity. The words "Secretary of the Army" are substituted for "Secretary" because of section 2 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33:2201).

In subsection (d), the words "U.S. Army Corps of Engineers" are substituted for "Corps of Engineers" for clarity.

1 So in original. Probably should be "Appropriations".
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

VERNON LORENZO ROLLE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-1785

[December 16, 2020]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Charles A. Schwab, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 1998-CF-002853 A.

Vernon Lorenzo Rolle, Columbus, Georgia, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Casiano v. State, 280 So. 3d 105, 107 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019)

(affirmance does not preclude challenge to the application of the prison 

releasee reoffender statute in any future case in which the State seeks to 

apply it).

LEVINE, C.J., CONNER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-4222

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. ALBERT EUGENE HARDY, JR., Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (1:07-cr-00010-LHT-1)

Submitted: November 6, 2009 Decided: November 19, 2009

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reita P. Pendry, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Edward R. Ryan, United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina; Amy E. Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Albert Eugene Hardy, Jr., appeals from his 168-month sentence, entered pursuant to his guilty plea to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute crack cocaine. On appeal, he asserts that the district court erred in failing to provide individualized reasoning for the chosen sentence, as required by

United States v. Carter , 564 F.3d 325 (4th Cir. 2009). The Government has raised Hardy’s appellate waiver contained in his plea agreement. Finding that Hardy has waived consideration of the claim on appeal, we dismiss. A defendant may, in a valid plea agreement, waive the right to appeal under 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (2006). See United States v. Wiggins , 905 F.2d 51, 53 (4th Cir. 1990). We review the validity of an appellate waiver de novo and will uphold a waiver of appellate rights if the waiver is valid and the issue being appealed is covered by the waiver. See United States v.

Blick , 408 F.3d 162, 168 (4th Cir. 2005). An appellate waiver is generally considered to be knowing and voluntary if the district court specifically questioned the defendant concerning the waiver provision during the Rule 11 colloquy and the record indicates that the defendant understood the full significance of

the waiver and was not denied effective assistance of counsel.

See United States v. Johnson , 410 F.3d 137, 151 (4th Cir. 2005).

23 During Hardy’s Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 hearing, the district court specifically questioned Hardy about the appellate waiver and, after doing so, found that Hardy voluntarily and intelligently entered his plea. The record reveals nothing to suggest that the district court’s finding was erroneous, and Hardy raises no claim to the contrary. Accordingly, the appellate waiver contained in Hardy’s plea agreement is valid and enforceable. Moreover, Hardy’s sole contention on appeal-- that the district court erred in failing to properly explain the basis for his sentence--is foreclosed by his appellate waiver. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### PART D—PUBLIC BUILDINGS, GROUNDS, AND PARKS IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Board Coverage Decision 

2010-42.8

Fort Worth Livestock Handling

Employer Coverage Terminated*

No Decision Published

BA # 4832
### §8107. Advertisements and sales in or around Washington Monument

Except on the written authority of the Director of the National Park Service, advertisements of any kind shall not be displayed, and articles of any kind shall not be sold, in or around the Washington Monument.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1206.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8107 | 40:43. | Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 299, §1 (proviso in 2d par. on p. 997), 35 Stat. 997. |

Section

The words "Director of the National Park Service" are substituted for "Secretary of War" [subsequently changed to "Director of Public Buildings and Public Parks of the National Capital["] because of section 3 of the Act of February 26, 1925 (ch. 339, 43 Stat. 983)] because of section 2 of Executive Order No. 6166 (eff. June 10, 1933) and the Act of March 2, 1934 (ch. 38, 48 Stat. 389).
BISNIS Trades & Tenders, January 4, 1999 - Part 1

----
§ 998.40 Purpose. This subpart— ( a ) Establishes policy and implements 33 U.S.C. 3071(a)(8), (a)(13), (b), and (c) to provide protection against reprisal to NOAA Corps officers for making or preparing or being perceived as making or preparing a protected communication.
( b ) Assigns responsibilities and delegates authority for such protection against reprisal and prescribes procedures.
#### James L. Rolfe, Appellant, v. Lester M. Spaide et al., Respondents.

Motion for reargument denied, with $10 costs; motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 943.]
### SUBCHAPTER IV—ACTIVITIES FOR HEALTH, INDEPENDENCE, AND LONGEVITY

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Title IV of the Older Americans Act of 1965, comprising this subchapter, was originally enacted by Pub. L. 89–73, title IV, as added Pub. L. 93–29, title IV, §401, May 3, 1973, 87 Stat. 45, and amended by Pub. L. 94–135, Nov. 28, 1975, 89 Stat. 717; Pub. L. 95–478, Oct. 18, 1978, 92 Stat. 1537; Pub. L. 97–115, §11(a), Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1601. Such title is shown herein, however, as having been added by Pub. L. 106–501, title IV, §401, Nov. 13, 2000, 114 Stat. 2257, without reference to such intervening amendments because of the extensive revision of the title's provisions by Pub. L. 106–501.

Prior sections 3030aa to 3030jj were omitted in the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 106–501.

A prior section 3030aa, Pub. L. 89–73, title IV, §401, as added Pub. L. 98–459, title IV, §401, Oct. 9, 1984, 98 Stat. 1780; amended Pub. L. 100–175, title I, §151, Nov. 29, 1987, 101 Stat. 951; Pub. L. 102–375, title IV, §401, Sept. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 1243, related to statement of purpose of this subchapter.

A prior section 3030bb, Pub. L. 89–73, title IV, §402, as added Pub. L. 98–459, title IV, §401, Oct. 9, 1984, 98 Stat. 1781; amended Pub. L. 100–175, title I, §§104(d), 105(d), 134(c)(1), Nov. 29, 1987, 101 Stat. 930, 941; Pub. L. 102–54, §13(q)(9)(C), June 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 281; Pub. L. 102–321, title I, §163(c)(2)(C), July 10, 1992, 106 Stat. 377; Pub. L. 102–375, title I, §102(b)(1)(A), title IV, §402, title IX, §904(a)(16), Sept. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 1200, 1244, 1308; Pub. L. 103–171, §§2(14), 3(a)(13), Dec. 2, 1993, 107 Stat. 1989, 1990, related to administration.

A prior section 3030jj, Pub. L. 89–73, title IV, §410, as added Pub. L. 98–459, title IV, §402, Oct. 9, 1984, 98 Stat. 1781; amended Pub. L. 100–175, title I, §134(c)(2), Nov. 29, 1987, 101 Stat. 941; Pub. L. 102–375, title IV, §403, Sept. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 1244, related to purpose of former part A of this subchapter.
Faulk, Scott (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

pua bebz <pua_bebz@yahoo.com> 

Tuesday, November 26, 2013 7:40 PM 

Faulk, Scott (OST); EAS (OST) 

kalaupapa Contract my choice 

~- .. - . ; ; . : 

· .. _ .. :: 

:._. i 1 ··-

- ;;. -_ .. : 

recently seeing this in the news paper, i decided to share my opinion. I live in molokai and ive been 

flying with mokulele for about few years now, and counting! loving their great service and flight times. i 

would choose mokulele to take passengers down to beautiful historic kalaupapa! 

1
### §1813. Health care

(a) Needed Care.—The Secretary shall provide an eligible child such health care as the Secretary determines is needed by the child for that child's covered birth defects or any disability that is associated with those birth defects.

(b) Authority for Care To Be Provided Directly or by Contract.—The Secretary may provide health care under this section directly or by contract or other arrangement with a health care provider.

(c) Definitions.—For purposes of this section, the definitions in section 1803(c) of this title shall apply with respect to the provision of health care under this section, except that for such purposes—

(1) the reference to "specialized spina bifida clinic" in paragraph (2) of that section shall be treated as a reference to a specialized clinic treating the birth defect concerned under this section; and

(2) the reference to "vocational training under section 1804 of this title" in paragraph (8) of that section shall be treated as a reference to vocational training under section 1814 of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 106–419, title IV, §401(a), Nov. 1, 2000, 114 Stat. 1857.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1813 was renumbered section 3713 of this title.

Another prior section 1813, Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1211, automatically guaranteed loans made to a veteran if made for the purpose of purchasing business property, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 93–569, §7(a), Dec. 31, 1974, 88 Stat. 1866.