alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS ADDED
BY


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Marco Community Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“Report”), I, Thomas M. Whelan, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of and for the period covered by the
report.

















Date:August 13,
      2008
            By:
            /s/
      Laura A. WittyLaura
      A. Witty, Interim Chief FinancialOfficer,
      Vice President and
Controller
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PR Specialists, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lawrence Ruden, Treasurer of our Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of our Company.



/s/ Lawrence Ruden

Lawrence Ruden

Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)

October 17, 2008
###### Editorial Note on Part 922

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

#### § 922.202 Joint management.

NOAA has primary responsibility for the management of the Sanctuary pursuant to the Act. However, NOAA shall co-manage the Sanctuary in collaboration with the State of Maryland and Charles County. The Director shall enter into a Memorandum of Agreement regarding this collaboration that shall address, but not be limited to, such aspects as areas of mutual concern, including Sanctuary programs, permitting, activities, development, and threats to Sanctuary resources.
AFS-13-169-E February 4, 2013

Mr. Jose Cordova Director of Quality and Materials Compass Airlines, Inc.

7500 Airline Drive, Suite 130 Minneapolis, MN 55450

Dear Mr. Cordova:

This letter is in response to your correspondence sent to the public docket dated January 22, 2013 (public docket No. FAA-2013-0059) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration for an exemption from § 121.803(c)(3) and Appendix A of part 121, Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations. The proposed ex emption, if granted, would provide relief from the requirement to include Atropine in an Emergency Medical Kit (EMK).

On January 25, 2013, the FAA issued Grant of Exemption No. 10690 (copy enclosed) to

Airlines for America, National Air Carrier A ssociation and Regional Airline Association and its members. The FAA finds that Compass Airlines, Inc., is covered under Exemption No. 10690; therefore, we will take no further action on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/ Ida M. Klepper Manager, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-001 January 4, 2010

NRC APPROVES FINAL RULE ON NUCLEAR REACTOR VESSEL 

PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission approved a final rule to provide alternate requirements 

for protection against pressurized thermal shock events in nuclear power plant reactor vessels. 

Updated analysis methods allow pressurized-water reactor (PWR) licensees to better account for 

some effects of aging on their reactor vessels. 

The rule increases the realism of calculations used to examine a PWR=s susceptibility to a 

phenomenon known as pressurized thermal shock (PTS). PTS can occur under some scenarios that 

rapidly cool the internal surface of the reactor vessel while the vessel is pressurized. This would 

subject the steel to substantial thermal stresses, which could lead to cracking and potential failure of 

the vessel. The other type of U.S. nuclear power plant design, a boiling water reactor, is not 

susceptible to PTS. 

The rule allows licensees of operating PWRs to voluntarily adopt a more realistic technical 

approach for determining the probability of vessel failure during a PTS event. This revised 

approach was derived using data from research on currently operating PWRs. The data indicate the 

overall risk of PTS-induced vessel failure after 60 years of reactor operation is much lower than 

previously estimated. 

 If a licensee chooses to adopt the new approach, the rule would require PWR operators to 

perform detailed analyses of both reactor vessel surveillance data and the results of regular reactor 

vessel inspections. If the analyses’ findings exceed certain limits, the operator must take steps to 

either limit the reactor vessel’s exposure to neutron radiation (which can make the vessel brittle) or 

determine how the reactor’s systems can be modified to prevent PTS-induced vessel failure. 

The rule is published in today’s Federal Register and will be available on the NRC=s Web 

site by entering ML083470915 at this address: http://adamswebsearch.nrc.gov/dologin.htm. For 

more information on the rule, contact NRC staff members Steward Schneider (telephone 301-415-

4123, e-mail. steward.schneider@nrc.gov), Barry Elliot (telephone 301-415-2709, e-mail 

barry.elliot@nrc.gov), or Mark Kirk (telephone 301-415-6015, e-mail mark.kirk@nrc.gov). 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. 

E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
NRC ISSUES ORDER TO BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

REVISING FIRE PROTECTION LICENSE AMENDMENT DEADLINE 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a Confirmatory Order to the Tennessee 

Valley Authority’s Browns Ferry nuclear power plant revising the date TVA has committed to 

submit a license amendment transitioning the plant’s three units to the National Fire Protection 

Association Standard 805. That standard contains performance-based guidelines that meet NRC 

regulations for protecting important equipment and systems within nuclear power plants. 

TVA had originally planned to submit its application in March of this year for the 

Browns Ferry plant, located near Athens, Ala. about 32 miles west of Huntsville. However, 

TVA has asked for the deadline to be extended to March 2013. After reviewing the information 

provided by TVA, including compensatory measures, additional modifications and the submittal 

schedule, the NRC is granting the extension and TVA has agreed to the Confirmatory Order to 

illustrate its continued commitment to transition to NFPA 805.

Copies of the Confirmatory Order are available from the Region II Office of Public 

Affairs by using the contact information above and it will be posted on the NRC website at 

www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/enforcement/actions.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No: II-12-037

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416

 May 22, 2012 

E-mail: OPA2.Resource@nrc.gov
### Part D—Repeal of Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for theyear ended December 31, 2004 of XO Communications, Inc.(the “Company”), as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, William Garrahan, Senior VicePresident and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.Date: March 18, 2005     /s/ William Garrahan           William Garrahan     Senior Vice President and     Acting Chief Financial Officer     (Principal Financial Officer)
### §3144. Authority to pay wages and list contractors violating contracts

(a) Payment of Wages.—

(1) In general.—The Secretary of Labor shall pay directly to laborers and mechanics from any accrued payments withheld under the terms of a contract any wages found to be due laborers and mechanics under this subchapter.

(2) Right of action.—If the accrued payments withheld under the terms of the contract are insufficient to reimburse all the laborers and mechanics who have not been paid the wages required under this subchapter, the laborers and mechanics have the same right to bring a civil action and intervene against the contractor and the contractor's sureties as is conferred by law on persons furnishing labor or materials. In those proceedings it is not a defense that the laborers and mechanics accepted or agreed to accept less than the required rate of wages or voluntarily made refunds.

(b) List of Contractors Violating Contracts.—

(1) In general.—The Comptroller General shall distribute to all departments of the Federal Government a list of the names of persons whom the Comptroller General has found to have disregarded their obligations to employees and subcontractors.

(2) Restriction on awarding contracts.—No contract shall be awarded to persons appearing on the list or to any firm, corporation, partnership, or association in which the persons have an interest until three years have elapsed from the date of publication of the list.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1152; Pub. L. 113–50, §2(a), Nov. 21, 2013, 127 Stat. 578.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3144(a)(1) | 40:276a–2(a) (1st sentence words before semicolon). | Mar. 3, 1931, ch. 411, §3, 46 Stat. 1494; Aug. 30, 1935, ch. 825, 49 Stat. 1012. |
| 3144(a)(2) | 40:276a–2(b). | |
| 3144(b) | 40:276a–2(a) (1st sentence words after semicolon, last sentence). | |

Section

In subsection (b), the words "or firms" are omitted as being included in "persons".

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2013—Pub. L. 113–50, §2(a)(1), struck out "of Comptroller General" after "Authority" in section catchline.

Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 113–50, §2(a)(2), substituted "Secretary of Labor" for "Comptroller General".
#### § 764.1 Introduction.

In this part, references to the EAR are references to 15 CFR chapter VII, subchapter C. This part specifies conduct that constitutes a violation of the ECRA and/or the EAR and the sanctions that may be imposed for such violations. Antiboycott violations are described in part 760 of the EAR, and the violations and sanctions specified in part 764 also apply to conduct relating to part 760, unless otherwise stated. This part describes administrative sanctions that may be imposed by BIS. This part also describes criminal sanctions that may be imposed by a United States court and other sanctions that are neither administrative nor criminal pursuant to sections 11A, B, and C of the Export Administration Act EAA and other statutes. Information is provided on how to report and disclose violations. Finally, this part identifies protective administrative measures that BIS may take in the exercise of its regulatory authority.

[85 FR 73416, Nov. 18, 2020]
### §1505. Examinations

To determine whether a contractor or subcontractor has complied with cost accounting standards prescribed under this chapter and has followed consistently the contractor's or subcontractor's disclosed cost accounting practices, an authorized representative of the head of the agency concerned, of the offices of inspector general established under chapter 4 of title 5, or of the Comptroller General shall have the right to examine and copy documents, papers, or records of the contractor or subcontractor relating to compliance with the standards.

(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3700; Pub. L. 117–286, §4(b)(71), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4350.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1505 | 41:422(k). | Pub. L. 93–400, §26(k), as added Pub. L. 100–679, §5(a), Nov. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 4062. |

Section

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–286 substituted "chapter 4 of title 5," for "the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.),".
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) May 2, 2011





CNA FINANCIAL CORPORATION(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware1-582336-6169860(State or other jurisdiction(Commission(IRS Employerof incorporation)File Number)Identification No.)











333 S. Wabash, Chicago, Illinois60604(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)





Registrant's telephone number, including area code     (312) 822-5000





NOT APPLICABLE(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)


Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions ( see General Instruction A.2. below):


[ ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


[ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)


[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))








1


---




ITEM 2.02 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION.


On May 2, 2011, the registrant issued a press release and posted on its website ( www.cna.com ) a financial supplement providing information on its results of operations for the first quarter 2011 .  The press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 and the financial supplement is furnished as Exhibit 99.2 to this Form 8-K.


The information under Item 2.02 and in Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2 in this Current Report is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for the purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section.  The information under Item 2.02 and in Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2 in this Current Report shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.





ITEM 9.01 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.


(d) Exhibits:


See Exhibit Index.





2


---




SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





CNA Financial Corporation(Registrant)Date:  May 2, 2011By/s/ D. Craig Mense(Signature)D. Craig MenseExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer





3


---




EXHIBIT INDEX





Exhibit No.Description99.1CNA Financial Corporation press release, issued May 2, 2011, providing information on the first quarter 2011 results of operations.99.2CNA Financial Corporation financial supplement, posted on its website May 2, 2011, providing supplemental financial information on the first quarter 2011.








4
### §1012. Disbursement and accounting: pay of enlisted members of the National Guard

Amounts appropriated for the pay, under subsections (a), (b), and (d) of section 206, section 301(f), section 402(e), and section 1002 of this title, of enlisted members of the Army National Guard of the United States or the Air National Guard of the United States for attending regular periods of duty and instruction shall be disbursed and accounted for by the Secretary of Defense. All such disbursements shall be made for 3-month periods for units of the Army National Guard or Air National Guard under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, and on pay rolls prepared and authenticated as prescribed in those regulations.

(Added Pub. L. 97–258, §2(i)(2)(B), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1061; amended Pub. L. 99–145, title XIII, §1303(b)(13)(A), (B), Nov. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 741; Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title VI, §602(c)(2), title IX, §913(c)(1), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 357, 411; Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title X, §1087(b)(5)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–292.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1012 | 31:698a. | Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, §31, 70A Stat. 632. |

The words "the Secretary concerned" are substituted for "officers and agents of the Finance Corps of the Army or finance officers of the Air Force, as the case may be" and "the Secretary of the Army or the Secretary of the Air Force, as the case may be" for consistency in the title. The words "various" and "issued" are omitted as surplus.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2000—Pub. L. 106–398 substituted "section 402(e)" for "section 402(b)(3)".

1996—Pub. L. 104–106 substituted "section 402(b)(3)" for "the last sentence of section 402(b)" and substituted "Secretary of Defense" for "Secretary concerned" in two places.

1985—Pub. L. 99–145 inserted ": pay of enlisted members of the National Guard" in section catchline, and substituted "for the pay, under subsections (a), (b), and (d) of section 206, section 301(f), the last sentence of section 402(b), and section 1002 of this title," for "under sections 206(a), (b), and (d), 301(f), 309, 402(b) (last sentence), and 1002 of this title for pay", "All such disbursements" for "Disbursements", and "as prescribed in those" for "under the".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1985 Amendment

Pub. L. 99–145, title XIII, §1303(b)(13)(D), Nov. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 741, provided that: "The amendments made by this paragraph [amending this section] shall take effect as if included in the enactment of section 2(i) of Public Law 97–258 [enacting this section]."
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

TOMMY HERRING, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 20-0811 (UNA)

)

FDA, et al., )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on the plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis

and his pro se complaint. For the reasons stated below, the Court will grant the application and 

dismiss the complaint.

The plaintiff alleges that, on September 21, 1979, a toxic chemical was injected into his 

spine. Compl. at 4. He identifies the substance as “AIDS virus,” and claims his health care 

providers have hidden this information from him by refusing to release his medical records. Id. 

Now that the “toxic chemical [has] eat[en] through the spine cord,” the plaintiff experiences pain. 

Id. He contends that this would not have happened to him if President John F. Kennedy had not 

been killed. Id. He demands damages of $19 billion. See id.

The trial court has the discretion to decide whether a complaint is frivolous, and such 

finding is appropriate when the facts alleged are irrational or wholly incredible. Denton v. 

Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 33 (1992); see Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989) (“[A] 

complaint, containing as it does both factual allegations and legal conclusions, is frivolous where 

it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact.”). Having reviewed the plaintiff=s complaint, 
the Court concludes that its factual allegations are baseless and wholly incredible. For this reason, 

the complaint is frivolous and must be dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1)(B). An Order 

consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.

/s/

AMY BERMAN JACKSON

United States District Judge

DATE: April 7, 2020