alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### N o r t h A l e u t i a n B a s i n S t

. G e o r g e B a s i n

B o w e r s B a s i n

A l e u t i a n A r c S h u m a g i n K o d i a k G u l f

o f
A l a s k a A l e u t i a n B a s i n N a v a r i n

B a s i n S t

. M a t t h e w H a l l N o r t o n B a s i n H o p e B a s i n

C o o k
I n l e t 

# A L A S K A C h u k c h i S e a
B e a u f o r t S e a 

## D e p a r t m e n t o f t h e I n t e r i o r O u t e r C o n t i n e n t a l S h e l f O i l a n d G a s S t r a t e g y

E x e c u t e d L e a s e s

D e f e r r a l A r e a

L o w R e s o u r c e P o t e n t i a l a n d / o r L o w S u p p o r t f o r P o t e n t i a l N e w L e a s i n g

L e a s i n g C o n s i d e r a t i o n 2 0 1 2

- 2 0 1 7 P r o g r a m

O C S P l a n n i n g A r e a B o u n d a r y

G C S N A D 8 3
A l a s k a A l b e r s P r o j e c t i o n M a y
, 2 0 1 3 N o t e : T h e M a r i t i m e B o u n d a r i e s a n d l i m i t s s h o w n h e r e o n

, a s w e l l a s t h e d i v i s i o n s b e t w e e n p l a n n i n g a r e a s

, a r e f o r i n i t i a l p l a n n i n g p u r p o s e s o n l y a n d d o n o t

n e c e s s a r i l y r e f l e c t t h e f u l l e x t e n t o f U

. S

. s o v e r e i g n

r i g h t s u n d e r i n t e r n a t i o n a l a n d d o m e s t i c l a w

. C a n a d a U

. S

. 

# 3

0 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 0
M i l e s

0 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 0
N a u t i c a l M i l e s
### §9302. Consent of Theodore Roosevelt Association required for development

(a) General Plan for Development.—The Theodore Roosevelt Association must approve every general plan for the development of Theodore Roosevelt Island.

(b) Development Inconsistent With Plan.—As long as the Association remains in existence, development inconsistent with the general plan may not be carried out without the Association's consent.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1233; Pub. L. 109–284, §6(30), Sept. 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 1213.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 9302 | 40:124 (proviso). | May 21, 1932, ch. 200, §1 (proviso), 47 Stat. 163. |

Section

The words "Theodore Roosevelt Association" are substituted for "Roosevelt Memorial Association" because of section 2 of the Act of May 21, 1953 (ch. 63, 36:210101 note).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 109–284 substituted "With" for "with" in heading.
### [§§3477, 3478. Vacant]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Prior to renumbering of sections 1651 to 1693 of this chapter as sections 3451 to 3493 by Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 406, sections 1677 and 1678 of this chapter were repealed.

Section 1677, added Pub. L. 90–77, title III, §302(b), Aug. 31, 1967, 81 Stat. 185; Pub. L. 90–631, §5, Oct. 23, 1968, 82 Stat. 1335; Pub. L. 91–219, title I, §102, title II, §203, Mar. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 76, 78; Pub. L. 92–540, title I, §102(1), title IV, §401(3), Oct. 24, 1972, 86 Stat. 1075, 1090; Pub. L. 93–508, title I, §102(1), Dec. 3, 1974, 88 Stat. 1579; Pub. L. 93–602, title II, §203(a), Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1958; Pub. L. 95–202, title I, §102(1), Nov. 23, 1977, 91 Stat. 1433; Pub. L. 96–466, title II, §§201(1), 211(1), title VI, §603(a), Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2187, 2189, 2209, which set forth provisions respecting eligibility, approval, etc., for flight training, was repealed by Pub. L. 97–35, title XX, §§2003(b)(3)(A), 2006, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 782, 783, effective Oct. 1, 1981, except as otherwise provided for persons receiving educational assistance.

Section 1678, added Pub. L. 90–77, title III, §306(a), Aug. 31, 1967, 81 Stat. 188, which related to special training for educationally disadvantaged, was repealed by Pub. L. 91–219, title II, §204(a)(2), Mar. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 79.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 3.13

            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                            EOTT Energy Finance Corp.
                     --------------------------------------


      EOTT Energy Finance Corp. (hereinafter called the "corporation"), a
corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, does hereby certify:

      1.    The name of the corporation is EOTT Energy Finance Corp.

      2.    The certificate of incorporation of the corporation is hereby
            amended by striking out Article 1 thereof and by substituting in
            lieu of said Article the following new Article:

            1.    The name of the corporation is Link Energy Finance Corp.

      3.    The amendment of the certificate of incorporation herein certified
            has [have] been duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of
            Sections 228 and 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
            Delaware.

      4.    This Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation shall
            be effective on October 1, 2003.

Executed on this 15 day of August, 2003.

                                             /s/ Thomas M. Matthews
                                             -----------------------
                                             Thomas M. Matthews- CEO
#### In the Matter of Frederick Clark, Petitioner, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[821 NYS2d 493]

*1143Lahtinen, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Superintendent of Auburn Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with violating count procedures, refusing a direct order, harassment and lying. The charges arose after petitioner failed to get up from his bed for a count as directed by a correction officer and then gave an insolent response. Following a tier II disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of all charges except lying. After exhausting his administrative remedies, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, as amplified by the testimony of its authoring correction officer, as well as the testimony of another inmate who heard the incident occur, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt *(see Matter of Price v Goord,*29 AD3d 1203, 1204 [2006]; *Matter of Deoleo v Selsky,*29 AD3d 1102, 1103 [2006]). Although petitioner contends that he was denied due process because the count procedures are not specifically set out in the disciplinary rule *(see*7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [13] [in]), the Hearing Officer found that the procedures had been posted in the blocks and printed in a manual that was accessible to inmates, and petitioner’s testimony at the hearing indicated that he understood and had fair notice of the rule. Moreover, it cannot be said that the rule, while not necessarily informative on its face, did not give petitioner, as “ ‘a person of ordinary intelligence,’ ” fair notice that refusing to cooperate in a count was forbidden *(Matter of Tavarez v Goord,*237 AD2d 837, 838 [1997], quoting *Matter of Rabi v LeFevre,*120 AD2d 875, 877 [1986]). Thus, we reject petitioner’s contention that the rule is impermissibly vague *(see Matter of Vigliotti v Carpenter,*16 AD3d 858, 859 [2005], *lv denied*5 NY3d 705 [2005]).

We have reviewed petitioner’s remaining challenges and find them to be without merit.

Crew III, J.P., Carpinello, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marco Community Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Richard Storm, Jr., Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of and for the period covered by the Report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                                                
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Date: September 27, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Richard Storm, Jr.                         
|                         |  |  |  |     |  | Richard Storm, Jr., Principal Executive Officer
BISNIS Trades & Tenders Special Issue:  Kharkiv Initiative ,  January 19, 1999

----
(October 31, 1951.)

#### In the Matter of the Estate of Daniel M. Edwards, Deceased. Smith and Sovik et al., Appellants; E. Winston Rodormer et al., as Trustees, et al., Respondents.

All concur. (Appeal from part of an order denying an application for an allowance for legal services.) Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 400
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 400 appear at 78 FR 69289, Nov. 19, 2013.

§ 400.35 Examiner's review—application for subzone designation. The examiner shall develop a memorandum with a recommendation on whether to approve the application, taking into account the criteria enumerated in § 400.26. To develop that memorandum, the examiner shall review the case records including public comments, and may request information and evidence from parties of record, as necessary. The examiner's memorandum shall generally be submitted to the Board within 30 days of the close of the period for public comment. However, additional time may be taken as necessary for analysis of any public comment in opposition to the application or if other complicating factors arise. ( a ) If the examiner's recommendation is unfavorable to the applicant, it shall be considered preliminary and the applicant shall be notified in writing (via electronic means, where appropriate) of the preliminary recommendation and the factors considered in its development. The applicant shall be given 30 days from the date of notification, subject to extensions upon request by the applicant, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, in which to respond to the recommendation and submit additional evidence pertinent to the factors considered in the development of the preliminary recommendations. Public comment may be invited on preliminary recommendations when warranted.
( b ) If the response contains new evidence on which there has not been an opportunity for public comment, the Executive Secretary shall publish notice in the Federal Register after completion of the review of the response. The new material shall be made available for public inspection and the Federal Register notice shall invite further public comment for a period of not less than 30 days, with an additional 15-day period for rebuttal comments.
( c ) If the factors considered for an examiner's recommendation(s) change as a result of new evidence, the applicable procedures of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section shall be followed.
( d ) The CBP adviser shall be requested, when necessary, to provide further comments, which shall be submitted within 45 days after the request.
[77 FR 12139, Feb. 28, 2012, as amended at 89 FR 8529, Feb. 8, 2024]
No. IV-12-037

Contact: Victor Dricks (817) 200-1128

 Lara Uselding (817) 200-1519

 

Sept. 11, 2012 

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

NRC ISSUES CONFIRMATORY ORDER BANNING INDIVIDUAL

FROM NRC LICENSED ACTIVITIES FOR 18 MONTHS

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a Confirmatory Order banning 

James Chaisson from engaging in NRC-licensed activities for 18 months for safety and security 

violations involving radioactive materials.

The NRC issued the Confirmatory Order after conducting an inspection and investigation 

that determined that Mr. Chaisson, as a former area supervisor and lead radiographer, engaged in 

deliberate misconduct while performing licensed activities when employed by Texas Gamma 

Ray, LLC, of Houston, Texas. 

Specifically, while employed by the company in Rock Springs, Wyo., Mr. Chaisson

deliberately failed to comply with NRC regulations by storing a device containing radioactive 

materials used to photograph pipe welds at a location not authorized by the company’s license 

periodically from December 2009 through April 2010, even though he knew the facility did not 

meet NRC security requirements.

Mr. Chaisson chose alternate dispute resolution (ADR) which uses a mediator to resolve 

issues. The Confirmatory Order is the result of an agreement reached during an ADR session 

conducted on July 26.

The order imposes an 18-month ban on engaging in NRC licensed activities, followed by 

limited work restrictions for a period of four years and requires Mr. Chaisson to successfully 

complete 80 hours of specialized training.

The NRC’s letter to the individual will be made available to the public through the 

agency’s electronic reading room at: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/html . Help in 

finding documents is available from the NRC Public Document Room at 1-800-397-4209.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV

 1600 E. Lamar Blvd.

 Arlington, TX 76011 - 4125

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov
###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.
#### § 720.4 Effect of denial.

Any person denied export privileges pursuant to this part shall be considered a “person denied export privileges” for purposes of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) (15 CFR parts 730 through 774). Orders denying export privileges pursuant to Parts 764 and 766 of the EAR are published in the Federal Register when they are issued and are legally controlling documents in accordance with their terms. BIS maintains unofficial compilations of persons denied export privileges on its Web site.

[71 FR 24929, Apr. 27, 2006, as amended at 73 FR 78183, Dec. 22, 2008]
§ 2017.4 Public inspection. USTR will make publicly available at *www.regulations.gov:* ( a ) Any written request, brief or similar submission of information made pursuant to this part; and
( b ) Any stenographic record of any public hearing that may be held pursuant to this part.
( c ) ( 1 ) USTR will grant business confidential status and withhold from public disclosure the information submitted if the petitioner certifies that the information customarily would not be released to the public and clearly designates the information as confidential business information.
( 2 ) To request business confidential status the petitioner must mark the submission “BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL” at the top and bottom of the cover page and on each succeeding page, and the submission should indicate, via brackets, the specific information that is confidential.
( 3 ) If the submission contains business confidential information, the petitioner also must submit a non-confidential version or summary, indicating where confidential information has been redacted, and a written explanation of why the material should be protected.
( 4 ) The non-confidential version or summary will be made publicly available at *www.regulations.gov .*
( 5 ) A request for exemption of any particular information may be denied if it is determined that such information is not entitled to exemption under law. In the event of such a denial, the information will be returned to the person who submitted it, with a statement of the reasons for the denial.
I am asking for a exemption under 14 CFR part 120 to combine my part 135 with my 91.147 

operation. I am the owner of both and think that in the public interest this would be a better use 

of material available. The combination would alow our operation to use the same drug program 

with the same personel.The name of the companies are: Under 91.147 John Tomaino DBA 

American Helicopters and under Part135 Western States Aircraft LLC with me(John 

Tomaino) as the DER. Express Evaluation Express Evaluation Express Evaluation Express Evaluation Express Evaluation Express Evaluation Express Evaluation Express Evaluation Express Evaluation Express Evaluation Express Evaluation

EVALUATION: Express Server

EVALUATION: Conversion Package
### §7333. Nondiscrimination against alcohol and drug abusers and persons infected with the human immunodeficiency virus

(a) Veterans eligible for treatment under chapter 17 of this title who are alcohol or drug abusers or who are infected with the human immunodeficiency virus shall not be discriminated against in admission or treatment by any Department health-care facility solely because of their alcohol or drug abuse or dependency or because of their viral infection.

(b) The Secretary shall prescribe regulations for the enforcement of this section. Such regulations, with respect to the admission and treatment of such veterans who are alcohol or drug abusers, shall be prescribed in accordance with section 7334 of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 94–581, title I, §111(a)(1), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2850, §4133; amended Pub. L. 100–322, title I, §122(a), May 20, 1988, 102 Stat. 503; renumbered §7333 and amended Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §§401(a)(4)(A), 402(d)(1), 403(a)(1), (2), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 221, 239.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–40, §401(a)(4)(A), renumbered section 4133 of this title as this section.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–40, §403(a)(2), substituted "Department" for "Veterans' Administration".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 102–40, §§402(d)(1), 403(a)(1), substituted "Secretary" for "Administrator" and "7334" for "4134".

1988—Pub. L. 100–322 substituted "Nondiscrimination against alcohol and drug abusers and persons infected with the human immunodeficiency virus" for "Nondiscrimination in the admission of alcohol and drug abusers to Veterans' Administration health care facilities" as section catchline, and amended text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "Veterans eligible for treatment under chapter 17 of this title who are alcohol or drug abusers and who are suffering from medical disabilities shall not be discriminated against in admission or treatment, solely because of their alcohol or drug abuse or dependence, by any Veterans' Administration health care facility. The Administrator, pursuant to the provisions of section 4134 of this title, shall prescribe regulations for the enforcement of this nondiscrimination policy with respect to the admission and treatment of such eligible veterans who are alcohol or drug abusers."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Restriction on Testing for Infection With Human Immunodeficiency Virus

Pub. L. 100–322, title I, §124, May 20, 1988, 102 Stat. 505, as amended by Pub. L. 102–83, §6(j)(3), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 409, provided that the Secretary of Veterans Affairs could not conduct a widespread program to test for the human immunodeficiency virus unless funds for the program were appropriated, with an exception for voluntary testing, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 110–387, title IV, §407, Oct. 10, 2008, 122 Stat. 4130.
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Thurman L. Holt, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 73-215;

Second District

August 28, 1974.

Cuve Glosser, of Rochelle, for appellant.

Patrick E. Ward, State’s Attorney, of Dixon (James W. Jerz, of Model District State’s Attorneys Office, of counsel), for the People.

Opinion by

Mr. JUSTICE RECHENMACHER.
|            |                                                                                                    |
|------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| “(n) | Excess Benefit Plan” means the separable portion of the Plan contained in Appendix B.” |

----
1 From:

Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 11:57 PM

To: RedHill

Subject: Protect our Water from Jet Fuel

Follow Up Flag: Follow up

Flag Status: Flagged

Aloha,

I am writing to express my extreme concern and dismay for the quality of our drinking water threatened by the jet fuel

leaking from Navy storage tanks in Red Hill. When will you protect this precious resource?

Please ensure this jet fuel is completely cleaned up immediately. Twenty

‐ five years is way to o long to wait before ac ting

to save our most precious resource. If the leaks cannot be immediately fixed, then the tanks must be emptied. This is

criminal since the aquifer supplies water for the citizens and farmlands of Oahu.

I also ask that the public comment period on the neg o tiated agreement between the U.S. Navy, Environmental

Protection Agency, and Hawaii Department of Health be extended to allow the public meaningful opportunity to

understand and weigh

‐ in on this important issue.

Please continue to keep me informed in this decision

‐ making process.

Thank you.
Wetland Units of Flint Hills NWR

Coffey and Lyon Counties, Kansas

6 | CREATED
43) WATURAL

Map #5 Wetland Units Map



ills National Wildlife Refuge —

Map # 7b Hunting Map


Soils of Flint Hills NWR

Coffey and Lyon Counties, Kansas

we
%

-e

Soil Capability Classes

I - Few or No Hazards

i -~
:
at a sv t
’ , at ES
pd
} « ~ A 2%

: : 2 “ie Map #4 Soils Map



Flint Hills National Wildlife Refuge

Coffey and Lyon Counties, Kansas

oA

Refuge Boundary
’ Croplands as of 1999

Map #6 Cropland/Farmland Map



NWI Data tsmad on May 1885, June 1885, ant
June 1986 color intared aerial photographs

Wetlands of Flint in NWR

nT ae Lyon Counes, Kansas

Draft

Acres of Wetlands Within Refuge Boundary

Legend

Wetland Water Regimes
Open Water
River
Seasonally Flooded
Hl Semipermanently Flooded
_| Temporarily Flooded
-| Upland

Map #8 Wetland Habitat Map



State of Kansas

mate

a

QuivirsNWR Hutchinson || @ Flint Hills National
ion - "a “Wildlife Refuge

Wichita | Kansas A Pittsbu

] Ammunition lant * ”

Map # 1 Vicinity Map



Flint Hills National Wildlife Refuge

{ pret a nes a e ss .
+ : - . 79

Fig, * ® .
a Be P|

et)

Map # 7a Public Use Map



Location

Map #2 Ecoregion Map


inties, Kansas

« ia . 2-

Flint Hills National Wildlife Refuge

Legend

Rd 100 jeg : i : | ; [J Refuge Boundary

_ Hartford . 3 [Q) Parking Area

: ; Boat Ramp

Gi Refuge Headquarters

Map #3 Base Map