alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 766.1 Scope.

In this part, references to the EAR are references to 15 CFR chapter VII, subchapter C. This part describes the procedures for imposing administrative sanctions for violations of the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended (the EAA), the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), or any order, license or authorization issued thereunder. Parts 760 and 764 of the EAR specify those actions that constitute violations, and part 764 describes the sanctions that apply. In addition to describing the procedures for imposing sanctions, this part describes the procedures for imposing temporary denial orders to prevent imminent violations of the EAA, the EAR, or any order, license or authorization issued thereunder. This part also describes the procedures for taking the discretionary protective administrative action of denying the export privileges of persons who have been convicted of violating any of the statutes, including the EAA, listed in section 11(h) of the EAA. Nothing in this part shall be construed as applying to or limiting other administrative or enforcement action relating to the EAA or the EAR, including the exercise of any investigative authorities conferred by the EAA. This part does not confer any procedural rights or impose any requirements based on the Administrative Procedure Act for proceedings charging violations under the EAA, except as expressly provided for in this part.
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the annual report of Worldwide Manufacturing USA, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), John Ballard, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ John Ballard

John Ballard

Chief Financial Officer

Date:  March 31, 2005
| 1.   | The      first unnumbered paragraph of the Note is hereby amended by deleting      therefrom the words “first anniversary” and inserting in lieu thereof the      words “second anniversary”. |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | This      Amendment shall become effectiveupon: |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------|

| a.   | The      Borrower’s payment to the Bank’s counsel’s fees and expenses of $2,247.50;      and |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| b.   | The      Bank’s receipt of a financial statement from the Guarantor dated on or      about December 7, 2007, substantially in the form of the “Financial      Statement” (as defined in theGuaranty). |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3.   | The      Note, as amended by this Amendment, remains in full force and      effect. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4.   | This      Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws      of the State of New York, without regard to conflicts of laws      principles. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 5.   | This      Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and by different      parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to      be an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute one in      the same instrument. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----
#### § 908.21 Report form.

Public Law 92-205 and these rules should be studied carefully prior to reporting. Reports required by these rules shall be submitted on forms obtainable on request from the Administrator, or on an equivalent format.[1] In special situations, such alterations to the forms as the circumstances thereto may render necessary may be made, provided they do not depart from the requirements of these rules or of Public Law 92-205.

###### Footnotes -
  908.21

[1] Filed as part of the original document.
### Part E—Reinsurance and Risk Adjustment
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Declaration of Disaster #3624, Amendment #3]

In accordance with a notice received from the Department of Homeland Security—Federal Emergency Management Agency—effective November 5, 2004, the above numbered declaration is hereby amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for physical damages as a result of this disaster to January 3, 2005.

                    All other information remains the same,                     *i.e.*, the deadline for filing applications for economic injury is June 15, 2005.                

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008)

Dated: November 10, 3004. 

Herbert L. Mitchell,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 04-25875 Filed 11-19-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-53,927] 

Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on January 2, 2004 in response to a worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Dixie Chips, Inc., Evergreen, Alabama. 

The petitioning group of workers is covered by an earlier petition filed on December 29, 2003 (TA-W-53,906) that is the subject of an ongoing investigation for which a determination has not yet been issued. Further investigation in this case would duplicate efforts and serve no purpose; therefore the investigation under this petition has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 8th day of January, 2004. 

Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 04-2598 Filed 2-5-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
#### Michael Brant, Appellant, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Edison Concrete Corp. et al., Defendants; George A. Fuller Co. et al., Respondents, and Walsh Construction Co. et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs. Slattery Construction Co., Third-Party Defendant.

No opinion. Carswell, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
ANNABELLA PINERA , Appellant,

v.
TARGET/SEDGWICK CMS , Appellee s

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 4077

_____________________________/
Opinion filed October 7 , 2016

. An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Marjorie Renee Hill , Judge

. Date of Accident: August 24, 2012.
Kimberly A. Hill of Kimberly A. Hill, P.L., Fort Lauderdale , for Appellant.
David S. Gold and David B. Stauber of Litchfield Cavo, LLP, Fort Lauderdale , for Appellee s

.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER C URIAM. In light of the Florida Supreme Court ’ s decision in Westphal v. City of St.
Petersburg , 194 So. 3d 311 (Fla. 2016), Appellant ’ s Motion for Rehearing filed June
9, 2016, is granted, and our opinion rendered June 7, 2016, is withdrawn. This matter **CORRECTED PAGES: pg 1 CORRECTION IS**  **UNDERLINED IN RED**  **MAILED: October 7, 2016 BY:**  **KMS**2 is remanded to the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) for reconsideration

consistent with Westphal

. The JCC also shall determine whether additional defenses
asserted by the Appellee s , if any, are appropriately raised and resolved under the

circumstances o f this case and the material change in the law represented
by Westphal

. REVERSED and REMANDED.
WETHERELL and KELSEY, JJ., and DEMPSEY, ANGELA C., Associate Judge, CONCUR.
§ 971.502 Conservation of resources. ( a ) If the Administrator establishes terms, conditions and restrictions relating to conservation of resources, he will employ a balancing process in the consideration of the state of the technology being developed, the processing system utilized and the value and potential use of any waste, the environmental effects of the recovery activities, economic and resource data, and the national need for hard mineral resources.
( b ) The application must set forth how the applicant's proposed method of collecting nodules will conserve resources by providing for the future opportunity for commercial recovery of the unrecovered balance of the resources in the proposed permit area. Although preliminary and subject to change, the discussion must include a plan for the chronology of areas to be mined. This is needed in order for the Administrator to determine if selective mining, expected to be carried out in the early years to improve cash flow, is part of a long range recovery plan.
( c ) If the applicant proposes a refining process that does not include the use of manganese in a productive manner, it may not render the manganese unavailable to future users by dispersing the tailings over a vast area unless such a scheme is necessary for the financial practicability of the commercial recovery activities of the applicant. A permittee must advise the Administrator in the annual report of the location, composition and quantity of manganese in tailings which remain after processing. Should national needs for manganese develop during the duration of a permit, e.g., in case of national emergency, the Administrator may cancel the exception granted involving dispersion of tailings. Applicants seeking an exception would be required to demonstrate how and in what time frame their commercial recovery processing activities could be modified to respond to new national needs.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Tranquility, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2007 (the Report), I, Dominick Pope, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations. August 18, 2008 /s/ Dominick Pope    Chief Financial Officer
### §3743. Liability on loans

Each individual who has an ownership interest in a veterans' small business concern that is provided a direct loan under this subchapter, or that obtains a loan guaranteed under this subchapter, shall execute a note or other document evidencing the direct or guaranteed business loan, and such individuals shall be jointly and severally liable to the United States for the amount of such direct loan or, in the case of a guaranteed loan, for any amount paid by the Secretary on account of such loan.

(Added Pub. L. 97–72, title III, §302(a), Nov. 3, 1981, 95 Stat. 1057, §1843; amended Pub. L. 101–237, title III, §313(b)(1), Dec. 18, 1989, 103 Stat. 2077; renumbered §3743, Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 406.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–83 renumbered section 1843 of this title as this section.

1989—Pub. L. 101–237 substituted "Secretary" for "Administrator".
#### § 265.2 Applicability.

The regulations in this part establish rules with respect to the parking and operation of motor vehicles and other activities and conduct on the site. These regulations are intended to supplement the rules and regulations regarding conduct in Part O of Subtitle A of this title and in other officially issued orders and regulations of the Department of Commerce and the National Institute of Standards & Technology

[39 FR 41170, Nov. 25, 1974, as amended at 55 FR 38316, Sept. 18, 1990]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6325

CLAYTON WESLEY CARLETON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WILLIE EAGLETON, Warden of Evans Correctional

Institution; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS; HENRY MCMASTER, Attorney General

of the State of South Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge.

(CA-02-909-4-23)

Submitted: June 12, 2003 Decided: June 17, 2003

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clayton Wesley Carleton, Appellant Pro Se. Derrick K. McFarland,

Samuel Creighton Waters, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH

CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIUM:

Clayton Wesley Carleton seeks to appeal the district court’s

order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may

not be taken to this court from the final order in a habeas corpus

proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate

of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). When a district

court dismisses a habeas petition solely on procedural grounds, a

certificate of appealability will not issue unless the petitioner

can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it

debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of a denial of

a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find

it debatable whether the district court was correct in its

procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.)

(quoting Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)), cert.

denied, 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Carleton has not satisfied this standard.

See Mitchell-El v. Cockrell, 123 S. Ct. 1029 (2003). Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We

deny Carleton’s motion for transfer of custody. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the material before the court and argument

would not aid in the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
### Part E—Nuclear Energy
### **CHAPTER 140—CRIMINAL JUSTICE IDENTIFICATION, INFORMATION, AND COMMUNICATION**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—CRIME IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY

Sec.
14601.
Transferred.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—EXCHANGE OF CRIMINAL HISTORY RECORDS FOR NONCRIMINAL JUSTICE PURPOSES

14611 to 14616. Transferred.
### Part C—Studies and Other Activities To Promote Effective Administration of Federal Elections
### §7408. Appointment of additional employees

(a) There shall be appointed by the Secretary under civil service laws, rules, and regulations, such additional employees, other than those provided in section 7306 and paragraphs (1) and (3) of section 7401 of this title and those specified in sections 7405 and 7406 of this title, as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter.

(b) The Secretary, after considering an individual's existing pay, higher or unique qualifications, or the special needs of the Department, may appoint the individual to a position in the Administration providing direct patient-care services or services incident to direct patient-services at a rate of pay above the minimum rate of the appropriate grade.

(Added Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §401(b)(2), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 229; amended Pub. L. 103–446, title XII, §1201(e)(21), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4686.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 4111 of this title prior to the repeal of that section as part of the complete revision of chapter 73 of this title by Pub. L. 102–40.

#### Amendments

1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–446 substituted "civil service" for "civil-service".
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-04-031] 

# AGENCY:

United States International Trade Commission. 

# Time and Date: 

December 10, 2004 at 11 a.m. 

# Place: 

Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000. 

# Status: 

Open to the public. 

# Matters To Be Considered:

1. Agenda for future meetings: none. 

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) (Wooden Bedroom Furniture from China)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before December 22, 2004.) 

5. Inv. Nos. 701-TA-437 and 731-TA-1060 and 1061 (Final) (Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from China and India)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determination to the Secretary of Commerce on or before December 22, 2004.) 

6. Outstanding action jackets: none. 

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

By order of the Commission.

Issued: November 15, 2004.

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission.

[FR Doc. 04-25800 Filed 11-17-04; 11:44 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
§ 310.8 Proposed plan for Federal participation. ( a ) Upon receipt of the statement, and the exhibits referred to in § 310.7, the Director shall prepare a proposed plan in cooperation with other interested departments and agencies of the Federal Government for Federal participation in the exposition.
( b ) In preparing the proposed plan for Federal participation in the exposition, the Director shall conduct a feasibility study of Federal participation including cost estimates by utilizing the services within the Federal Government, professional consultants and private sources as required and in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
( c ) The Director, in the proposed plan for Federal participation in the exposition, shall determine whether or not a Federal pavilion should be constructed and, if so, whether or not the Government would have need for a permanent structure in the area of the exposition or whether a temporary structure would be more appropriate.
( d ) The Director shall seek the advice of the Administrator of the General Services Administration to the extent necessary in carrying out the proposed plan for Federal participation in the exposition.
( e ) Upon completion of the proposed plan for Federal participation in the exposition, the Director shall submit the plan to the Secretary.
### §1716. Hospital care by other agencies of the United States

When so specified in an appropriation or other Act, the Secretary may make allotments and transfers to the Departments of Health and Human Services (Public Health Service), the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Interior, for disbursement by them under the various headings of their appropriations, of such amounts as are necessary for the care and treatment of veterans entitled to hospitalization from the Department under this chapter. The amounts to be charged the Department for care and treatment of veterans in hospitals shall be calculated on the basis of a per diem rate approved by the Office of Management and Budget.

(Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1143, §616; Pub. L. 94–581, title II, §202(g), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2856; Pub. L. 97–295, §4(95)(A), Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1313; renumbered §1716 and amended Pub. L. 102–83, §§4(a)(3), (4), (b)(1), (2)(E), 5(a), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 404–406.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), renumbered section 616 of this title as this section.

Pub. L. 102–83, §4(b)(1), (2)(E), substituted "Secretary" for "Administrator".

Pub. L. 102–83, §4(a)(3), (4), substituted "Department" for "Veterans' Administration" in two places.

1982—Pub. L. 97–295 substituted "Health and Human Services" for "Health, Education, and Welfare".

1976—Pub. L. 94–581 substituted "Office of Management and Budget" for "Bureau of the Budget".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1976 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 94–581 effective Oct. 21, 1976, see section 211 of Pub. L. 94–581, set out as a note under section 111 of this title.