alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 890.1018 Determining length of debarment for an entity owned or controlled by a sanctioned provider. OPM shall determine the length of debarments of entities under 5 U.S.C. 8902a(c)(2) based on the type of violation committed by the person with an ownership or control interest. The types of violations actionable under this provision are: ( a ) *Owner/controller's debarment.* The debarment of an entity based on debarment of an individual with an ownership or control interest shall be for a period concurrent with the individual's debarment. If any aggravating or mitigating circumstances set forth in § 890.1016 apply solely to the entity and were not considered in setting the period of the individual's debarment, OPM may debar the entity for a period longer or shorter than the individual's debarment.
( b ) *Owner/controller's conviction.* The debarment of an entity based on the criminal conviction of a person with an ownership or control interest for an offense listed in 5 U.S.C. 8902a(b)(1)-(4) shall be for a period of not less than 3 years, subject to adjustment for any aggravating or mitigating circumstances set forth in § 890.1016 applying solely to the entity.
( c ) *Owner/controller's civil monetary penalty.* The debarment of an entity based on a civil monetary penalty imposed on a person with an ownership or control interest, shall be for a period of not less than 3 years, subject to adjustment for any aggravating or mitigating circumstances set forth in § 890.1016 applying solely to the entity.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2523 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2523

To designate the United States courthouse located at 125 Bull Street in 
   Savannah, Georgia, as the ``Tomochichi United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 19, 2003

  Mr. Burns introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the United States courthouse located at 125 Bull Street in 
   Savannah, Georgia, as the ``Tomochichi United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 125 Bull Street in 
Savannah, Georgia, shall be known and designated as the ``Tomochichi 
United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Tomochichi 
United States Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
BISNIS Search For Partners,  April 20, 1998

----

Index of Investment Opportunities:
1. Samara, Russia - Poultry Production
B.C.D. 00-21 JUN 0 1 2000

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Chester Valley Railway, Inc.

This is the decision of the Railroad Retirement Board regarding the

status of the Chester Valley Railway, Inc., as an employer under the

Railroad Retirement and Railroad Unemployment Insurance Acts.

Chester Valley (B.A. Number 4272) was held to be an employer under the

Acts effective March 29,1996. According to Mr. John C. Nolan, President

ofChester Valley, the railroad ceased operations December 31, 1997. The

corporation was dissolved on or about December 21,1999. The service

formerly provided by Chester Valley is now being provided by Penn

Eastern Rail Lines, Inc., a covered employer under the Acts (B.A. No.

2378), as of December 31,1997.

It is the determination ofthe Board that Chester Valley ceased to be an

employer under the Railroad Retirement and Railroad Unemployment

Insurance Acts effective with the close of business on December 31, 1997.

Jerome F. Kever
#### In the Matter of the Application of U. S. Vitamin Corporation et. al., Appellants, to Stay Arbitration Demanded by Harry E. Dubin, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Van Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**uBid.com
      Holdings, Inc.**





**CERIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that:





1.
      The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of uBid.com Holdings, Inc. for the quarter ended
      September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      the
      date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of uBid.com Holdings,
      Inc.




Date,
                November 14, 2007
            /s/Miguel
                A. Martinez, Jr.By:
                Miguel A. Martinez, Jr.Vice
                President, Finance





1
### SUBCHAPTER II—NATIONAL VISITOR FACILITIES ADVISORY COMMISSION
### §1101. Policy

The policy of the Federal Government is to publicly announce all requirements for architectural and engineering services and to negotiate contracts for architectural and engineering services on the basis of demonstrated competence and qualification for the type of professional services required and at fair and reasonable prices.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1129.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1101 | 40:542. | June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title IX, §902, as added Pub. L. 92–582, Oct. 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1279. |

Section

The words "The Congress hereby declares" are omitted as unnecessary.
§ 295.6 Criteria for selection. The evaluation criteria to be used in selecting any proposal for funding under this program, and their respective weights, are listed in this section. No proposal will be funded unless the Program determines that it has scientific and technological merit and that the proposed technology has strong potential for broad-based economic benefits to the nation. Additionally, no proposal will be funded that does not require Federal support, that is product development rather than high risk R&D, that does not display an appropriate level of commitment from the proposer, or does not have an adequate technical and commercialization plan. ( a ) *Scientific and technological merit (50%).* The proposed technology must be highly innovative. The research must be challenging, with high technical risk. It must be aimed at overcoming an important problem(s) or exploiting a promising opportunity. The technical leverage of the technology must be adequately explained. The research must have a strong potential for advancing the state of the art and contributing significantly to the U.S. scientific and technical knowledge base. The technical plan must be clear and concise, and must clearly identify the core innovation, the technical approach, major technical hurdles, the attendant risks, and clearly establish feasibility through adequately detailed plans linked to major technical barriers. The plan must address the questions of “what, how, where, when, why, and by whom” in substantial detail. The Program will assess the proposing team's relevant experience for pursuing the technical plan. The team carrying out the work must demonstrate a high level of scientific/technical expertise to conduct the R&D and have access to the necessary research facilities.
( b ) *Potential for broad-based economic benefits (50%).* The proposed technology must have a strong potential to generate substantial benefits to the nation that extend significantly beyond the direct returns to the proposing organization(s). The proposal must explain why ATP support is needed and what difference ATP funding is expected to make in terms of what will be accomplished with the ATP funding versus without it. The pathways to economic benefit must be described, including the proposer's plan for getting the technology into commercial use, as well as additional routes that might be taken to achieve broader diffusion of the technology. The proposal should identify the expected returns that the proposer expects to gain, as well as returns that are expected to accrue to others, *i.e.*, spillover effects. The Program will assess the proposer's relevant experience and level of commitment to the project and project's organizational structure and management plan, including the extent to which participation by small businesses is encouraged and is a key component in a joint venture proposal, and for large company single proposers, the extent to which subcontractor/subrecipient teaming arrangements are featured and are a key component of the proposal.
[63 FR 64414, Nov. 20, 1998]
```

[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 21 (Thursday, January 31, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 773]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00321]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Advancing Translational 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; SBIR Topic 18.
    Date: February 12, 2019.
    Time: 3:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, Room 
1037, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Rahat (Rani) Khan, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Center for Advancing 
Translational Sciences, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Rm. 1078, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-594-7319, [email protected].

    This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in 
advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of 
December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.859, 
Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.350, 
B--Cooperative Agreements; 93.859, Biomedical Research and Research 
Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 25, 2019.
Natasha M. Copeland,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-00321 Filed 1-30-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2438 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2438

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 115 West Pine Street in Hattiesburg, Mississippi, as the ``Major 
            Henry A. Commiskey, Sr. Post Office Building''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2438

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 115 West Pine Street in Hattiesburg, Mississippi, as the ``Major 
            Henry A. Commiskey, Sr. Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 115 
West Pine Street in Hattiesburg, Mississippi, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Major Henry A. Commiskey, Sr. Post Office 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Major Henry A. Commiskey, 
Sr. Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 4, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 890.1033 Notice of suspension. ( a ) *Written notice.* OPM shall send written notice of suspension according to the procedures and methods described in § 890.1006(c)-(f).
( b ) *Contents of notice.* The suspension notice shall contain information indicating that: ( 1 ) The provider has been suspended, effective on the date of the notice;
( 2 ) The initial period of the suspension;
( 3 ) The basis for the suspension;
( 4 ) The provisions of law and regulation authorizing the suspension;
( 5 ) The effect of the suspension; and
( 6 ) The provider's rights to contest the suspension.
February 7 , 2012



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JIMMY RAYNOR AND RUB Y LEWIS, INDIVIDUALL Y AND AS REPRESENTATIVES OF T HE ESTATE OF JOSEPH LYNN RAYNOR, DECEASE D , Appellants

NO. 14

- 10

- 01242

- CV V.

MOORES MACHINE SHOP, LLC , Appellee

____________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Moores Machine Shop, LLC, signed November 19, 2010, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore order the judgment of the court below REVERSED and REMAND the cause for proceedings in accordance with the court's opinion.

We order appellee, Moores Machine Shop, LLC, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. We further order this decision ce rtified below for observance.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 18

- 00318

- CV Osbaldo A. SAENZ Jr., Appellant

v. OSBALDO A. SAENZ SR. AND MARIA ESTELA G. SAENZ TRUST by and through its Trustee Esther A. S. Salmon, Appellee From the 381st Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas Trial Court No. DC

- 16

- 89 Honorable Jose Luis Garza, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice Delivered and Filed: June 2 7, 2018
DIS MISSED When Osbaldo A. Saenz Jr. filed this appeal, he was required to pay a $205.00 filing fee.
See T EX
. R. A PP
. 5; T EXAS S UPREME C OURT O RDER R EGARDING F EES C HARGED I N C IVIL C ASES I N THE S UPREME C OURT AND THE C OURTS OF A PPEALS AND B EFORE THE J UDICIAL P ANEL ON M ULTIDISTRICT L ITIGATION (Misc. Docket No. 159158, Aug. 28, 2015). Saenz did not pay the filing fee, and the clerk of this court notified Saenz by letter on May 15, 2018, that his notice of appeal was conditionally filed and the filing fee was due by May 29, 2018. The filing fee was not paid.04

- 18

- 00318

- CV

- 2

- In addition, the trial court clerk filed a notification of late record, stating that the clerk’s record, which was due June 4, would not be filed because Saenz had not paid or made arrangements
t o pay the clerk’s fee to prepare the record and is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee. On June 7, 2018, this court ordered that Saenz must, not later than June 18, 2018, either (1) pay this court’s filing fee and provide written proof that he ha s paid the trial court clerk’s fee for preparing the record or has made arrangements satisfactory to the clerk to pay the fee or (2) provide written proof to this court that he is indigent, or otherwise excused by statute or the Texas Rules of Appellate Pr ocedure from paying the fee. See T EX
. R. C IV
. P. 145; T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5, 20.1. The court advised Saenz that if he failed to respond satisfactorily within the time ordered, the appeal would be dismissed. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3. Saenz has not paid the filing fee, the clerk’s record has not been filed, and Saenz has not otherwise responded to our June 7, 2018 order. We therefore dismiss this appeal.
PER CURIAM
### §8141. Contract to rent buildings in the District of Columbia not to be made until appropriation enacted

A contract shall not be made for the rent of a building, or part of a building, to be used for the purposes of the Federal Government in the District of Columbia until Congress enacts an appropriation for the rent. This section is deemed to be notice to all contractors or lessors of the building or a part of the building.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1208.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8141 | 40:34. | Mar. 3, 1877, ch. 106 (words after 2d semicolon in 3d par. under heading "Miscellaneous"), 19 Stat. 370. |

Section
#### Margaret G. McNally, as Administratrix of the Estate of Louis J. McNally, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v. John M. Cragen et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Appeal from order directing a verdict in favor of respondent John M. Cragen dismissed, without costs. There is no such order. Present — Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.
### §606. Regulations related to operation

(a) In General.—The Director of the Office of Personnel Management shall prescribe regulations to govern executive agencies in authorizing civilian personnel to operate Federal Government-owned motor vehicles for official purposes within the States of the United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the territories and possessions of the United States.

(b) Elements of the Regulations.—The regulations shall prescribe standards of physical fitness for authorized operators. The regulations may require operators and prospective operators to obtain state and local licenses or permits that are required to operate similar vehicles for other than official purposes.

(c) Agency Orders.—The head of each executive agency shall issue orders and directives necessary for compliance with the regulations. The orders and directives shall provide for—

(1) periodically testing the physical fitness of operators and prospective operators; and

(2) suspension and revocation of authority to operate.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1123.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 606 | 40:491(j). | June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title II, §211(j), as added Sept. 5, 1950, ch. 849, §5(c), 64 Stat. 583; Sept. 1, 1954, ch. 1211, §2, 68 Stat. 1128; Pub. L. 86–624, §27(b), July 12, 1960, 74 Stat. 418. |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "Director of the Office of Personnel Management" are substituted for "United States Civil Service Commission" in section 211(j) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 because of section 102 of Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1978 (eff. Jan. 1, 1979, 92 Stat. 3783). The words "territories and" are added for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code.
### §15502. Comprehensive economic and infrastructure development plans

(a) State Plans.—In accordance with policies established by a Commission, each State member of the Commission shall submit a comprehensive economic and infrastructure development plan for the area of the region represented by the State member.

(b) Content of Plan.—A State economic and infrastructure development plan shall reflect the goals, objectives, and priorities identified in any applicable economic and infrastructure development plan developed by a Commission under section 15303.

(c) Consultation With Interested Local Parties.—In carrying out the development planning process (including the selection of programs and projects for assistance), a State shall—

(1) consult with local development districts, local units of government, and local colleges and universities; and

(2) take into consideration the goals, objectives, priorities, and recommendations of the entities described in paragraph (1).

(d) Public Participation.—

(1) In general.—A Commission and applicable State and local development districts shall encourage and assist, to the maximum extent practicable, public participation in the development, revision, and implementation of all plans and programs under this subtitle.

(2) Guidelines.—A Commission shall develop guidelines for providing public participation, including public hearings.

(Added Pub. L. 110–234, title XIV, §14217(a)(2), May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1476, and Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title XIV, §14217(a)(2), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 2238.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 enacted identical sections. Pub. L. 110–234 was repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the first day of the first fiscal year beginning after June 18, 2008, see section 14217(d) of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as a note under section 15101 of this title.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                       Performance Capital Management, LLC

                CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                           PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Performance Capital
Management,  LLC (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 as
filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  David  J.  Caldwell, as Chief Operations Officer of the Company, and
Edward  M.  Rucker, as Accounting Manager of the Company, each hereby certifies,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Sec.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that,  to  the  best  of  his  knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



   /s/  David  J.  Caldwell
---------------------------
David  J.  Caldwell
Chief  Operations  Officer
August  16,  2004



   /s/  Edward  M.  Rucker
--------------------------
Edward  M.  Rucker
Accounting  Manager
August  16,  2004



The material contained in this exhibit is not deemed "filed" with the Commission
and  is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under
the  Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any
general  incorporation  language  contained in such filing, except to the extent
that  the  Company  specifically  incorporates  it  by  reference.


<PAGE>