alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### **CHAPTER 32—PENALTY AND FRANKED MAIL**

Sec.
3201.
Definitions.
3202.
Penalty mail.
3203.
Endorsements on penalty covers.
3204.
Restrictions on use of penalty mail.
3205.
Accounting for penalty covers.
3206.
Reimbursement for penalty mail service.
3207.
Limit of weight of penalty mail; postage on overweight matter.
3208.
Shipment by most economical means.
3209.
Executive departments to supply information.
3210.
Franked mail transmitted by the Vice President, Members of Congress, and congressional officials.
3211.
Public documents.
3212.
Congressional Record under frank of Members of Congress.
3213.
Seeds and reports from Department of Agriculture.
3214.
Mailing privilege of former President; surviving spouse of former President.
3215.
Lending or permitting use of frank unlawful.
3216.
Reimbursement for franked mailings.
3217.
Correspondence of members of diplomatic corps and consuls of countries of Postal Union of Americas and Spain.
3218.
Franked mail for survivors of Members of Congress.
3219.
Mailgrams.
3220.
Use of official mail in the location and recovery of missing children.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1985**—Pub. L. 99–87, §1(a)(2), Aug. 9, 1985, 99 Stat. 290, added item 3220.

**1981**—Pub. L. 97–69, §6(c)(2), Oct. 26, 1981, 95 Stat. 1043, substituted "survivors" for "surviving spouses" in item 3218.

**1973**—Pub. L. 93–191, §§1(b), 4(b), 12(b), Dec. 18, 1973, 87 Stat. 741, 742, 746, substituted "Franked mail transmitted by the Vice President, Members of Congress, and congressional officials" for "Official correspondence of Vice President and Members of Congress" in item 3210, substituted "President, surviving spouse of former President" for "Presidents" in item 3214, and added item 3219.
NRC SEEKING ROUNDTABLE PARTICIPANTS FOR SEPTEMBER PUBLIC 

MEETING ON THE USE OF RADIOACTIVE CESIUM-137 CHLORIDE SOURCES 

 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is seeking individuals interested in participating in 

roundtable discussions at a public meeting scheduled for Sept. 29-30 in Rockville, Md. The 

meeting is being held to solicit early public input on issues associated with the use of radioactive 

cesium chloride sources. Interested individuals must submit their names to the NRC by Sept. 1. 

There will be five roundtable sessions on the topics of: alternative cesium chloride 

sources, alternative technologies, phase out and transportation issues, additional enhanced 

security, and potential future requirements. For each roundtable session, five to seven panel 

members will be selected. The goal is to receive broad stakeholder perspectives on each of the 

five topics. 

Cesium chloride sources are used in many different devices including irradiators. 

However, the workshop will concentrate on the use of sources identified by the International 

Atomic Energy Agency as Category 1 and 2 sources, which may pose a significant risk to public 

health and the environment if not properly handled and secured. The National Academy of 

Sciences has recently recommended the replacement or elimination of certain cesium chloride 

sources. 

 Those interested in being roundtable participants should contact John P. Jankovich, at 

(301) 415-7904 or Cynthia Jones, at (301) 415-0298, or via e-mail to john.jankovich@nrc.gov or 

Cynthia.jones@nrc.gov. An NRC staff member will follow-up with interested participants with 

additional details. More information is also available in the Federal Register, at 

http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-17545.pdf. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-153 August 19, 2008
[LETTERHEAD OF EQUITY ONE]

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2
                                January 31, 2000

<TABLE>
<S>                                     <C>                         <C>
The Chase Manhattan Bank                AMBAC Indemnity Corp.       Equity One ABS, Inc.
450 West 33rd Street                    One State Street Plaza      103 Springer Bldg.
15th Floor                              18th Floor                  3411 Silverside Road
New York, NY 10001                      New York, NY 10004          Wilmington, DE 19810
Attn: Norma Catone, Account Officer     Attn: Warren Tong, VP
</TABLE>

RE:  Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 1998
     (the "Agreement") for Equity One ABS, Inc.
     Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 1998-1
     ------------------------------------------------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     Pursuant to the provisions of the Agreement, I, Lynn Barry, Assistant Vice
President of Equity One, Inc. Inc. (the "Servicer") do hereby certify as
follows:

     1.  A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from
         December 1, 1998 through November 30, 1999 and of its performance under
         the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

     2.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
         fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
         respects throughout such period.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 31st day of January
2000.

                                              EQUITY ONE, INC.


                                              /s/ Lynn Barry
                                              -----------------------------
                                              Lynn Barry
                                              Assistant Vice President

LB/lv

cc: Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP
    2600 One Commerce Square
    Philadelphia, PA 19103-7098
    Attn: David Joseph, Esquire

                              - YOUR LOAN SOURCE -

             523 Fellowship Road * Suite 230 * Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

DAVID CARLETTI AND BRENDA CARLETTI, H/W,

Petitioners

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 576 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 14th day of March, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
## us.Departmentof 

### Transportation Officeofthe Secretary ofTransportation

MEMORANDUM TO DOCKET 2009-0155 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

On September 15, 2010, the Secretary ofTransportation, togetherwith the Deputy Secretary, the General Counsel, Assistant SecretaryforAviation and International Affairs, and othersenior staff, metwith Mr. Richard Anderson, CEO of Delta Airlines, and members of his corporate staff. Mr, Anderson had requested the meeting. He made several points relating both tothe ongoing Delta/Virgin antitrust immunity (ATI) proceeding and to the international aviation industry and U.S. Airline competition with foreign airlines generally, with emphasis on Delta's role in it.

With regard to the ATI case, Mr. Anderson discussed the character ofthe U.S.-Australia market and Delta's service in it. He emphasized Delta's position regarding its perceived need for antitrust immunity, arguing that two other carriers already serve the marketwith large market shares, and the applicants need ATI to compete effectively. He further asserted thatthe tentative decision was inconsistentwith past DOT precedent, and thatthis was the first application to be rejected.

In response, the Secretary emphasized thatthe Department reviews applications in a consistent
manner. The Assistant Secretary expressed her readiness to workwith carriers within the context ofthe Department's statutory mandate, and that Delta had been treated fairly and openly in the course ofthe ATI proceeding, She emphasized thatthe Department must proceed and decide in accordance with the statute.

Both she and the Secretary noted theirwillingness to grant Delta's unopposed motion for additional time to respond to the Department's show-cause order in that case, and to engage furtherwith Delta on the issues.
AZERBAIJAN:  LEGAL ENVIRONMENT AND LEGISLATION UPDATE

----

March 1999
Excerpt from "The USACC Investment Guide to Azerbaijan 1999," available at the April 27-28 USACC's Conference "Azerbaijan in the 21st Century" in Los Angeles (see contact at end). Authored by Ledingham Chalmers/Jura Consultants, Baku, Azerbaijan
INTRODUCTION
The legal system in Azerbaijan is in a state of transition as the Republic transforms itself from thecommand economy controlled by Moscow during the days when Azerbaijan was a SocialistRepublic of the Soviet Union to a market oriented economy controlled by its own elected executiveand legislature.
The process of such historic change is complex and this has been reflected in the laws of Azerbaijan.For despite the adoption of a new constitution in 1995, certain laws and regulations of the formerSoviet Union remain partially in force, although this situation is slowly but steadily changing. Theconstitutional authority and status of legislation or bodies enacting legislation may not always beclear and formalities in relation to the enactment of legislation may not always have been followed,all of which may affect the validity of legislative acts. Problems may also arise when consideringthe relative hierarchy of laws where there are inconsistencies in two or more laws. Even with theenactment of new legislation, there can be a lack of co-ordination between Parliament, the variousMinistries and the President's Office resulting in some laws being passed which may appear toconflict with one other. An added complication is that the secondary legislation (ie. Acts of thePresident's Office, the Cabinet of Ministers and various Ministries) are not consistently publishedor reported and, thus, it can be very difficult to confirm whether certain legislation is in existenceor not.
One more complication is that enacted laws are not always followed consistently by differentbranches of the State and instances of violation of laws in practice by government agencies are notinfrequent.  The system of judicial protection of rights is not effective, in particular in instanceswhen the executive body is involved.
The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the UK Know How Fund and theEuropean Union's Technical Assistance for the CIS (TACIS) Scheme have been providing guidanceto the Azeri government to assist in improving a legislative structure which effectively responds tothe current pace of economic development as well as providing a solid base for the futuredevelopment of a market oriented economic system.
This article aims to provide some general assistance for foreign investors in dealing with legislationin Azerbaijan. It is imperative that legal and tax advisers are contacted in Baku for the mostup-to-date information as a result of the frequency with which laws and taxation matters change andto provide specific advice that may apply to any individual project.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

# RECEIVED JUN 252014 

## HEARING DOCKET *********************************************** In the Matter of Ridan Investments, Inc. Respondent. 

## • * 

## • • 

## • * 

## • • * * *********************************************** FAA Docket No.: TO BE ASSIGNED FDMS No.: FAA-2013-1082 FAA Case No.: 2012S0700133 FAA Region: Western-Pacific Judge: Hon. Richard C. Goodwin COMPLAINANT'S NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY

To: Administrative LawJudge (ALJ) Richard C. Goodwin, and Respondent, through its counsel, Lawrence M. Burek, herein: On or about June 10,2014, ALJ Goodwin served his Amended Procedural Order inthe instant matter. Paragraph 2 ofthat Procedural Order stated, "The parties shall be prepared to present this case at a hearing on or after August 1, 2014
..." As ofthe date of preparation ofthis Notice, no hearing date has yet been noticed. Complainantrespectfully requests that the hearing date be scheduled for a date on
or after August 25, 2014 based onits representative's unavailability. Complainant's representative has pre-approved leave and will be out ofthe office from July 28, 2014 and will notreturn until the week ofAugust 18,2014. Consequently, Complainantrespectfully requests thatthe hearing inthis matter be scheduled for August 25, 2014, or later, inorder to bepresent andproperly prepare for a hearing.

Respectfully submitted, NAOMI TSUDA Regional Counsel
By: Courtne Adolph General A-ttorney Dated: June 17,2014

2CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certifY that on this date I have placed in the United States mail, postage prepaid, the executed original, and one copy of the COMPLAINANT'S NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY, addressed as follows: Hearing Docket Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000 I further certifY that onthis date I have sent via facsimile and placed inthe United States mail, postage prepaid, a copy ofthe above, addressed as follows: The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Ave., S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, D.C. 20590 Attn.: PatriciaMatthews, StaffAssistant Facsimile: (202) 366-7536 And by e-mail and United States mail, postage prepaid, a copy of the above, addressed as follows:
Lawrence M. Burek (Counsel for Respondent) 550 North Parkcenter Drive, Suite 204 SantaAna, CA 92705 E-mail: lburek@lsblawyers.com

.· Dated: JUN 17 ·.2014 

# 1/

# ~.~

Antonia Garcia, Paralegal Office ofthe Regional Counsel Federal AviationAdministration Western-Pacific Region Lawndale, California 3
DISTRIBUTIONIN KAZAKSTAN

----
### §59c. East River, New York

That portion of the East River, in New York County, State of New York, lying between the south line of East Seventeenth Street, extended eastwardly, the United States pierhead line as it existed on July 1, 1965, and the south line of East Thirtieth Street, extended eastwardly, is hereby declared to be not a navigable water of the United States within the meaning of the Constitution and the laws of the United States.

(Pub. L. 89–298, title III, §307, Oct. 27, 1965, 79 Stat. 1094.)
# L_2023117EN.01000101.xml

| 4.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 117/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 117/1

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 277/2022

of 28 October 2022

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2023/873]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1177 of 7 July 2022 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/683 by introducing and updating, in the templates for the information document and certificate of conformity in paper format, the entries as regards certain safety systems, and adjusting the numbering system for the approval certificates for a type of vehicle, system, component or separate technical unit (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1177 of 7 July 2022 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/683 by introducing and updating, in the templates for the information document and certificate of conformity in paper format, the entries as regards certain safety systems, and adjusting the numbering system for the approval certificates for a type of vehicle, system, component or separate technical unit (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 51a (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/683) of Chapter I of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32022 R 1177: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1177 of 7 July 2022 (OJ L 183, 8.7.2022, p. 54).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32022 R 1177: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1177 of 7 July 2022 (OJ L 183, 8.7.2022, p. 54).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1177 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 29 October 2022, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 28 October 2022.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kristján Andri STEFÁNSSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 183, 8.7.2022, p. 54.

1

(*)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*

---
### Part F—Benefits
§ 700.10 Authority. ( a ) *Delegations to the Department of Commerce.* The priorities and allocations authorities of the President under Title I of the Defense Production Act with respect to industrial resources have been delegated to the Secretary of Commerce under Executive Order 13603 of March 16, 2012 (3 CFR, 2012 Comp., p. 225). The priorities authorities of the President under the Selective Service Act and related statutes with respect to industrial resources have also been delegated to the Secretary of Commerce under Executive Order 12742 of January 8, 1991 (3 CFR, 1991 Comp. 309).
( b ) *Delegations by the Department of Commerce.* The Department of Commerce has authorized the Delegate Agencies to assign priority ratings to orders for industrial resources needed for use in approved programs.
( c ) *Jurisdiction limitations.* ( 1 ) The priorities and allocations authority for certain items have been delegated under Executive Order 13603, other executive orders, or Interagency Memoranda of Understanding between other agencies. Unless otherwise agreed to by the concerned agencies, the provisions of this part are not applicable to: ( i ) Food resources, food resource facilities, livestock resources, veterinary resources, plant health resources, and the domestic distribution of farm equipment and commercial fertilizer (delegated to the Department of Agriculture);
( ii ) All forms of energy (delegated to the Department of Energy);
( iii ) Health resources (delegated to the Department of Health and Human Services);
( iv ) All forms of civil transportation (delegated to the Department of Transportation); and
( v ) Water resources (delegated to the Department of Defense/U.S. Army Corps of Engineers).
( 2 ) The priorities and allocations authority set forth in this part may not be applied to communications services subject to Executive Order 13618 of July 6, 2012—Assignment of National Security and Emergency Preparedness Communications Functions (3 CFR, 2012 Comp., p. 273).
[79 FR 47565, Aug. 14, 2014, as amended at 89 FR 58971, July 22, 2024]
### §703. Allotments: members of Coast Guard

Members of the Coast Guard may, under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Homeland Security, make allotments from their pay and allowances.

(Pub. L. 87–649, Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 484; Pub. L. 90–623, §3(1), Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1314; Pub. L. 107–296, title XVII, §1704(c), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2314.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 703 | 14:464. | [None.] |

The words "members of the Coast Guard" are substituted for the words "officers and enlisted men", since together they compose the entire membership.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2002—Pub. L. 107–296 substituted "Secretary of Homeland Security" for "Secretary of Transportation".

1968—Pub. L. 90–623 substituted "Secretary of Transportation" for "Secretary of the Treasury".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2002 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 107–296 effective on the date of transfer of the Coast Guard to the Department of Homeland Security, see section 1704(g) of Pub. L. 107–296, set out as a note under section 101 of Title 10, Armed Forces.

#### Effective Date of 1968 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 90–623 intended to restate without substantive change the law in effect on Oct. 22, 1968, see section 6 of Pub. L. 90–623, set out as an Effective Date of 1968 Amendment note under section 5334 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
### §110102. Organization

(a) Federal Charter.—Jewish War Veterans of the United States of America, Incorporated (in this chapter, the "corporation"), a nonprofit corporation incorporated in New York, is a federally chartered corporation.

(b) Expiration of Charter.—If the corporation does not comply with any provision of this chapter, the charter granted by this chapter expires.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1367.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 110102(a) | 36:2701(a). | Aug. 21, 1984, Pub. L. 98–391, §§1(a), 15 (last sentence), 16, 98 Stat. 1358, 1361. |
| 110102(b) | 36:2714 (last sentence).36:2715. | |

Section

36:2715.

In subsection (a), the words "a nonprofit corporation incorporated in New York" are substituted for "organized and incorporated as a nonprofit entity under the laws of the State of New York", and the words "is a federally chartered corporation" are substituted for "is hereby recognized as such and is granted a Federal charter", for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary words.

In subsection (b), the text of 36:2714 (last sentence) is omitted as included in 36:2715. The words "restrictions or" are omitted as unnecessary.
### §6304. Certain contracts limited to one-year term

Except as otherwise provided, an executive department shall not make a contract for stationery or other supplies for a term longer than one year from the time the contract is made.

(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3804.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6304 | 41:13. | R.S. §3735. |

Section

The words "an executive department shall not" are substituted for "it shall not be lawful for any of the executive departments to" to state the legal prohibition directly and to eliminate unnecessary words.