alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In connection with the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report of Superior Oil and
Gas Co. (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the
"Report"),  I, Daniel  Lloyd,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  hereby
certify that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78o(d)); and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  Mach 12, 2007

                                                      /s/ Daniel Lloyd
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Daniel Lloyd
                                                     Chief Financial Officer


     The above  certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350) and is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.







                                                                    Exhibit 32.1
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 222 (Thursday, November 18, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 67546]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25552]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE


Office of the Secretary; Notice of Closed Meeting

AGENCY: Defense Intelligence Agency Joint Military Intelligence 
College.

ACTION: Notice of closed meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of Subsection (d) of Section 10 of 
Pub. L. 92-463, as amended by Section 5 of Pub. L. 94-409, notice is 
hereby given that a closed meeting of the DIA Joint Military 
Intelligence College Board of Visitors has been scheduled as follows:

DATES: Tuesday, 4 January 2005, 1100 to 1700; and Wednesday, 5 January 
2005, 0800 to 1600.

ADDRESSES: Joint Military Intelligence College, Washington, DC 20340-
5100.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. A. Denis Clift, President, DIA 
Joint Military Intelligence College, Washington, DC 20340-5100 (202/
231-3344).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The entire meeting is devoted to the 
discussion of classified information as defined in Section 552b (c) 
(1), Title 5 of the U.S. Code and therefore will be closed. The Board 
will discuss several current critical intelligence issues and advise 
the Director, DIA, as to the successful accomplishment of the mission 
assigned to the Joint Military Intelligence College.

    Dated: November 12, 2004.
Jeannette Owings-Ballard,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 04-25552 Filed 11-17-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
No. IV-11-044

Contact: Victor Dricks (817) 860-8128

 Lara Uselding (817) 276-6519

 

October 5, 2011 

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

NRC BEGINS SPECIAL INSPECTION OF URANIUM ONE USA

URANIUM RECOVERY FACILITY IN WYOMING

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission began a special inspection today at the 

Uranium One Irigaray and Christensen Ranch in situ uranium recovery facility located near 

Casper, Wyo. 

On October 2, two operators were working at the facility, when an alarm sounded and the 

yellowcake dryer automatically shut down. Operators then noticed airborne yellowcake uranium 

outside the dryer enclosure within the process building.

In situ recovery facilities recover uranium from ores using a chemical injection process to 

remove the uranium. The uranium is then separated from the solution, concentrated, and dried to 

form yellowcake. 

An NRC inspector is traveling to the site to evaluate the incident and corrective actions 

underway. It appears that a seal on the dryer may have broken, causing the yellowcake powder to 

escape. Current information indicates there were no major safety impacts or release to the 

environment as the dryer is housed inside a pressurized sealed room within a building. The licensee 

is in the process of cleaning up the uranium within the facility. 

The NRC is conducting a special inspection to determine if the workers received any 

exposure to the yellowcake. The site ceased uranium recovery operations in 2000 and was restarted 

in January. The special inspection will ensure that the licensee takes appropriate corrective actions 

after reviewing the incident. 

The Irigaray and Christensen Ranch facility is operated by Uranium One USA Inc. After 

completing onsite preoperational inspections in December 2010, NRC notified Uranium One on 

Dec. 17, 2010, that it had fulfilled the necessary requirements to begin operations. The facility is 

authorized to produce up to 2.5 million pounds of uranium oxide, or yellowcake, annually.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125

Telephone: (817) 860-8128

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov
The NRC inspectors will issue a publicly available inspection report on their findings within 

45 days of the end of the inspection.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES link 

on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to 

NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.
#### § 286.10 Appeal.

Any applicant or other affected party may appeal to the NIST Director any action taken under the program. When appropriate, the Director may seek an independent review by the Deputy Chief Counsel.
Uzbekistan: President Signs Decree on Import Regulation Measures

----

**February 1998**
Source:  Tashkent NARODNOYE SLOVO
Decree by the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan on additional measures to regulate importoperations With the object of improving the regulation system of import operations and tighteningcontract and financial discipline while carrying them out, I decree:
To accept a proposal of the Ministry of Foreign Economic Relations, the Ministry ofMacroeconomics and Statistics, and the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Uzbekistan tointroduce a package of measures on 1 March 1998, to regulate the import of goods (work andservices) through tariffs, and to liberalize the procedure for concluding import contracts and forsupervising their execution in the Republic of Uzbekistan. The current procedure at authorizedbanks and custom houses for registering and supervising the execution of import contracts ofcorporate bodies and private individuals is to remain in place.  It shall be established that onlyimport contracts of economic entities that are not provided with foreign currency resources oftheir own are to be registered at the Uzbek Ministry of Foreign Economic Relations.  It isspecified that those imports at the Republic's customs borders which are not to be paid for inforeign currency are not subject to customs registration.
Such imports are placed in a bonded warehouse for a limited time, only upon the expiry of whichif the appropriate documents are not presented are they to be returned to the supplier at theimporter's expense. It shall be established that only the Ministry of Finance of the Republic ofUzbekistan and the authorized banks have the right to give guarantees of payment for importcontracts while carrying out international transactions.
Ministries, departments, and local administrations in the Republic of Uzbekistan are prohibitedfrom giving foreign partners any guarantee of payment for imports.  The Ministry of ForeignEconomic Relations, the Ministry of Finance, the State Customs Committee of the Republic ofUzbekistan, and the authorized banks should strictly follow the set procedure for fundingimport contracts. In the interests of domestic consumer market protection, the Cabinet ofMinisters of the Republic of Uzbekistan is within a week's time to revise:
#### § 734.601 Employees who work on an irregular or occasional basis.

An employee who works on an irregular or occasional basis or is a special Government employee as defined in 18 U.S.C. 202(a) is subject to the provisions of the applicable subpart of this part when he or she is on duty.

# Example:

An employee appointed to a special commission or task force who does not have a regular tour of duty may run as a partisan political candidate, but may actively campaign only when he or she is not on duty.
§ 2004.32 Production prohibited unless approved. ( a ) *Approval required.* An employee or any other person or entity in possession of records or information may not produce those records or information, or provide any testimony related to the records or information, in response to any demand or request without prior written approval from the General Counsel.
( b ) *Penalties.* Any person or entity that fails to comply with this subpart may be subject to the penalties provided in 18 U.S.C. 641 and other applicable laws. A current employee also may be subject to administrative or disciplinary proceedings.
U.S. Caspian Ambassadors' Tour

----

**February 1999**
The U.S. Trade and Development Agency (TDA) is organizing a tour of several U.S. cities forU.S. Ambassadors and senior commercial officers in the Caspian region.  The tour will takeplace April 30 to May 6, 1999.  The delegation will brief U.S. businesses on the latest projectdevelopments in the area, and businesses will have the opportunity for one-on-one meetings withthese senior U.S. Government officials.  
U.S. Ambassadors to the following countries will take part in the tour:
-  Armenia     Azerbaijan
   Georgia
   Kazakhstan
   Turkey
   Turkmenistan
  Uzbekistan

Sectors to be highlighted include: oil and gas pipelines, water and wastewater, power,telecommunications,transportation, and support services, including hotels, food processing, and retail facilities.
Friday, April 30
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Davy Crockett National Forest Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) meeting will meet on November 30, 2004.

# DATES:

The Davy Crockett National Forest RAC meeting will be held on November 30, 2004.

# ADDRESSES:

The Davy Crockett National Forest RAC meeting will be held at the Davy Crockett Ranger Station located on State Highway 7, approximately one-quarter mile west of FM 227 in Houston County, Texas. The meeting will begin at 6 p.m. and adjourn at approximately 9 p.m. A public comment period will be at 8:45 p.m.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Raoul Gagne, District Ranger, Davy Crockett National Forest, Rt. 1, Box 55 FS, Kennard, Texas 75847: Telephone: 936-655-2299 or e-mail at:                         *rgagne@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Davy Crockett National Forest RAC proposes projects and funding to the Secretary of Agriculture under section 203 of the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self Determination Act of 2000. The purpose of the November 30, 2004 meeting is to review and approve project proposals to submit to the Forest Supervisor for National Forests and Grasslands in Texas. These meetings are open to the public. The public may present written comments to the RAC. Each formal RAC meeting will also have time, as identified above, allocated for hearing public comments. Depending on the number of persons wishing to comment and time available, the time for individual oral comments may be limited.

Dated: November 5, 2004.

Raoul W. Gagne,

Designated Federal Officer, Davy Crockett National Forest RAC.

[FR Doc. 04-25179  Filed 11-10-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Henry Schectman, Appellant.

*1020Present—'Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ.
#### Maxine Pottish, Respondent, v. Morris Pottish, Appellant.

*832Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
#### § 5.8 Approval of regulations.

The provisions of this part have been approved by the Director, Bureau of the Budget, pursuant to Executive Order 10604, of April 22, 1955.
§ 10.3 Development of a proposed standard. ( a ) A proposed standard as submitted to the Department: ( 1 ) Shall be based on adequate technical information, or, in the case of size standards (including standards covering the quantities for packaged consumer commodities), on adequate marketing information, or both, as determined to be appropriate by the Department;
( 2 ) Shall not be contrary to the public interest;
( 3 ) Shall be technically appropriate and such that conformance or nonconformance with the standard can be determined either during or after the manufacturing process by inspection or other procedures which may be utilized by either an individual or a testing facility competent in the particular field;
( 4 ) Shall follow the format prescribed by the National Institute of Standards & Technology. (Copies of the recommended format may be obtained from the Office of Product Standards Policy, National Institute of Standards & Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899.);
( 5 ) Shall include performance requirements if such are deemed by the Department to be technically sound, feasible, and practical, and the inclusion of such is deemed to be appropriate;
( 6 ) May include dimensions, sizes, material specifications, product requirements, design stipulations, component requirements, test methods, testing equipment descriptions, and installation procedures. The appropriateness of the inclusion in a standard of any particular item listed in this subparagraph shall be determined by the Department; and
( 7 ) Shall be accompanied by rational statements pertaining to the requirements and test methods contained in the standard, if deemed necessary by the Department.
( b ) A proposed standard that is determined by the Department to meet the criteria set forth in paragraph (a) of this section may be subjected to further review by an appropriate individual, committee, organization, or agency (either government or nongovernment, but not associated with the proponent group).
( c ) A proposed standard may be circulated by the Department to appropriate producers, distributors, users, consumers, and other interested groups for consideration and comment as well as to others requesting the opportunity to comment.
( d ) The proponent group or appropriate committee which drafted the initial proposal under § 10.1(d) shall consider all comments and suggestions submitted by the reviewer designated under paragraph (b) of this section, and those received by the Department as a result of any circulation under paragraph (c) of this section, and may make such adjustments in the proposal as are technically sound and as are believed to cause the standard to be generally acceptable to producers, distributors, users, consumers, and other interested parties. The proposal will then be submitted to the Department for further processing.
[51 FR 22497, June 20, 1986, as amended at 55 FR 38315, Sept. 18, 1990]
________________________________________________________________________ 

TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 20-1231.2 

SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL COOPERATION 

Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and ISRAEL 

Signed at Ariel October 28, 2020 

Entered into force December 31, 2020 
 

 

NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)— 

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.”
HeinOnline -- 44 Fed. Reg. 38912 1979HeinOnline -- 44 Fed. Reg. 38913 1979
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Fibria Celulose S.A. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Marcelo Strufaldi Castelli, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(i)                                     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)                                  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| By:    | /s/ Marcelo Strufaldi Castelli |                       |
|--------|--------------------------------|----------------------------|
|   | Name:                          | Marcelo Strufaldi Castelli |   |
|   | Title:                         | Chief Executive Officer    |   |

 

Dated: February 27, 2015.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
### §3629. Reduced rates for voter registration purposes

The Postal Service shall make available to a State or local voting registration official the rate for any class of mail that is available to a qualified nonprofit organization under section 3626 for the purpose of making a mailing that the official certifies is required or authorized by the National Voter Registration Act of 1993.

(Added Pub. L. 103–31, §8(h)(1), May 20, 1993, 107 Stat. 86.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The National Voter Registration Act of 1993, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 103–31, May 20, 1993, 107 Stat. 77, which was formerly classified principally to subchapter I–H (§1973gg et seq.) of chapter 20 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering in Title 52, Voting and Elections, and is now classified principally to chapter 205 (§20501 et seq.) of Title 52. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective (1) with respect to a State that, on May 20, 1993, has a provision in the constitution of the State that would preclude compliance with section 20501 et seq. of Title 52, Voting and Elections, unless the State maintained separate Federal and State official lists of eligible voters, on the later of Jan. 1, 1996, or the date that is 120 days after the date by which, under the constitution of the State as in effect on May 20, 1993, it would be legally possible to adopt and place into effect any amendments to the constitution of the State that are necessary to permit compliance with section 20501 et seq. of Title 52 without requiring a special election, and (2) with respect to a State not described above, on Jan. 1, 1995, see section 13 of Pub. L. 103–31, set out as a note under section 20501 of Title 52.
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Carlos Maldonado

*Eugene J. Riccio,*special public defender, in support of the petition.

■ *LindaN. Knight,*assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided April 5, 1988

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 13 Conn. App. 368, is denied.
.,~. ,

321 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Mrs. IL E. S*pp, Exooutlvo &orobart 

Teaohor ~Rotiromont syqteo of hua 

Au* tla, Tax@8 

Doer 

l r o tiea the 

l b1leh.d 

sing * dosir* for 

fad th8t at t&al 

aot nat8hod the Tosoher 

nd r*tlre*ent 00tia not 

tha stat. n0t0h0a the 

or roeord *a lntaot, shs 

wao 88ktba to m&o aa option@ crmleotion to 

be dfeotlte when rstlrownt 00ola bo etieotire. Mlso Riley @hose option one and 

named ham mphew, Jn8tin Aobror ftilul, 68 

WJiSiROO. 

*The Teaoher Retirement Law ~88 emondod 

in 1941 a@ an cot oi the 49th Leglslaturo. 

The follow 

9 

10 a quotation of Seotion 3, 

Sub-aeotlon , 0r the sot: 

, 
"'. . . prti%dad further ~thot a0 rotlxvmmUt aboll k efPO0tiVo priar f0 AUgUSt 31, 1941." 

-8tkbe0ti0a 9, 0r th0 said awd84d: 

“‘. . . with tie provision that so eptioarl 

seleotioa rbll bo offoqtlvo in oaeo * wri4br.y ~aia8, wi$h&4 thdrty 450) $WB atto? r*- 

tir uo a t, l a6 t&at~ r\ub. a boaofioiar~ 8lull bo 

a @ a BUc r uc L l B ( 1 r o tiv* mbor l t-tbt!a ko o f 

do sth, untu th a tlr st p *ymmat n Oo o DlmOS t 

8~ 80m0i timit kbaer nwaly ano . . .g 
ma. a. B. Yapp - pago s 

qwnaa. that opinion fur thel dvlaed r that the bsaatlt8~papablq under the 4mtna4tt eat were iialt4a t4 rOturn Of hi8 

aooumuIat@d oontrlbutlona as authorlaod uadar Submotion 6 

of Seat-ion 6. 

ti 004ll4OtiO4 With Om OOS4~&6a~4tiO~ Of ,th4 QU44tiQll 

8ubmlttad. them ha8 bmn fllsd with u8 i briar In ru&mt 

or the 010&m of xr. if. A. n&l&r ‘te boaeritr unaer tb 

optional aotaotl@a ohosae b$,YLsa Mersare$ Roillr. 24s brirt 

ditr~rr with oar aOOrtr00tlon 0s tb 80i~iy 40a 0riwt 0s 

the ls4l u#nduat 0f~tho Yoaohn Rmtltm&t Aat, ln8oror a8 

It relet08 to th&s oxaim. fn adaltloa,, it * osmtwdod tbot 

ii sh4 OOCi8~TU0ti~B rhif#b WO b8V4 giV68 tq~.th4 -4@i ~LO 40X+404, 

then tha sot I8 v~olatlv* of, tJm met04 rl.gW8 eT X&88,p*Wy 

ana her adyi+a haetiol*ry, brorwe tie, .bpd ,&ew e+rr*tthIa@ ~toqairod of liti by lrr to~enWX@ .Jmr Bo ~zellmw*cll 

prior 60 th puuga Or t&w lr4l awMmn@ iti rhtoh .lt M 

be paid, thw ug not be. 

Wry truly