alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3699B. Treatment of certain for-profit educational institutions

(a) In General.—In the case of any for-profit educational institution that is converted to a nonprofit educational institution, the State approving agency or the Secretary when acting as a State approving agency shall conduct annual risk-based surveys of the institution during the three-year period beginning on the date on which the educational institution is so converted.

(b) Risk-based Survey Defined.—In this section, the term "risk-based survey" means the risk-based survey developed under section 3673A of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 116–315, title I, §1022(a), Jan. 5, 2021, 134 Stat. 4959.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 116–315, title I, §1022(c), Jan. 5, 2021, 134 Stat. 4959, as amended by Pub. L. 117–16, §5(a), June 8, 2021, 135 Stat. 283, provided that: "Section 3699B of title 38, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply with respect to the conversion of a for-profit educational institution to a nonprofit educational institution, or the conversion of a for-profit educational institution to a public educational institution, that occurs on or after the date of the enactment of this Act [Jan. 5, 2021]."

[Pub. L. 117–16, §5(b), June 8, 2021, 135 Stat. 283, provided that: "The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending section 1022(c) of Pub. L. 116–315, set out above] shall apply as if included in the enactment of the Johnny Isakson and David P. Roe, M.D. Veterans Health Care and Benefits Improvement Act of 2020 (Public Law 116–315)."]
§ 285.8 Proficiency testing. ( a ) *Proficiency testing requirements.* Proficiency testing undertaken to meet the criteria for NVLAP accreditation shall be consistent with the provisions contained in NIST Handbook 150, *NVLAP Procedures and General Requirements* (incorporated by reference, see § 285.16), where applicable, including revisions from time to time. Laboratories must participate in proficiency testing as specified for each LAP in the NVLAP program handbooks.
( b ) *Analysis and reporting.* Proficiency testing results are analyzed by NVLAP and results of the analysis are made known to the participants. Any result not meeting the criteria specified in the NVLAP LAP program handbook is identified as a nonconformity.
( c ) *Proficiency testing nonconformities.* ( 1 ) Unsatisfactory participation in any proficiency testing program is a technical nonconformity which must be resolved in order to obtain initial accreditation or maintain accreditation.
( 2 ) Proficiency testing nonconformities are defined as, but not limited to, one or more of the following: ( i ) Failure to meet specified proficiency testing performance requirements prescribed by NVLAP;
( ii ) Failure to participate in a regularly scheduled “round” of proficiency testing for which the laboratory has received instructions and/or materials;
( iii ) Failure to submit laboratory control data as required; or
( iv ) Failure to produce acceptable test or calibration results when using NIST Standard Reference Materials or special artifacts whose properties are well-characterized and known to NIST/NVLAP.
( 3 ) NVLAP will notify the laboratory of proficiency testing nonconformities and actions to be taken to resolve the nonconformities. Denial or suspension of accreditation will result from failure to resolve nonconformities.
[85 FR 60060, Sept. 24, 2020]
Agency Spotlight

----

**May 1998**
**European Bank for Reconstruction and Development** The EBRD recently updatedits World Wide Web document "Alternative Sources of Finance for Small and Medium-SizedProjects in Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union." Found on the Bank'swebsite, the document contains country-by-country information on the EBRD's equity- and loan-financing programs, including investment or venture capital funds, regional funds, lendingprograms involving local banks, and other assistance to small and medium-sized enterprises.  Thisdocument is available at www.ebrd.org/new/index.htm.
**U.S. Department of Commerce/U.S. Commercial Service**The U.S. Commercialwill move to new facilities in St. Petersburg, effective May 18, 1998.  The Commercial Serviceand the American Business Center/St. Petersburg will be located at 25 Nevsky
§ 240.4 Definitions. ( a ) The term *container of less capacity than the standard small barrel,* as mentioned in section 3 of the law and as used in the rules and regulations in this part, is defined as any container not in barrel form containing therein a net weight of lime of less than 180 pounds.
( b ) The term *label* as used in the rules and regulations in this part is defined as any printed, pictorial, or other matter upon the surface of a barrel or other container of lime subject to the provisions of this act, or upon cloth or paper or the like which is permanently affixed to it by pasting or in a similar manner.
( c ) The term *tag* is defined as a tough and strong strip of cloth or paper or the like, bearing any printed, pictorial, or other matter, which is loose at one end and which is secured to a container of lime subject to the provisions of the act.
(Sec. 3, 39 Stat. 530; 15 U.S.C. 239)
### §423. Validity of allowance payments based on purported marriages

A payment of an allowance, based on a purported marriage, that is made under this chapter, under the Career Compensation Act of 1949, or under the Pay Readjustment Act of 1942, before judicial annulment or termination of that marriage, is valid, if a court of competent jurisdiction adjudges or decrees that the marriage was entered into in good faith on the part of the spouse who is a member of a uniformed service or if, in the absence of such a judgment or decree, such a finding of good faith is made by the Secretary concerned or by a person designated by him to investigate the matter.

(Pub. L. 87–649, Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 479.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 423 | 37:303. | Oct. 12, 1949, ch. 681, §503, 63 Stat. 827. |

The words "or which hereafter may be" are omitted as surplusage. The words "a person designated by him to investigate the matter" are substituted for the words "such person as he may designate for the purpose".

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Career Compensation Act of 1949, referred to in text, is act Oct. 12, 1949, ch. 681, 63 Stat. 802, which was classified principally to chapter 4 (§231 et seq.) of former Title 37, Pay and Allowances, prior to the revision and reenactment of Title 37 by Pub. L. 87–649, Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 451. For distribution of sections of chapter 4 of former Title 37, see Table preceding section 101 of this title.

The Pay Readjustment Act of 1942, referred to in text, is act June 16, 1942, ch. 413, 56 Stat. 359, which was classified principally to chapter 2 (§101 et seq.) of former Title 37, Pay and Allowances, prior to the revision and reenactment of title 37 by Pub. L. 87–649, Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 451. For distribution of sections of chapter 2 of former title 37, see Table preceding section 101 of this title.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, George Kadifa, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Annual Report of Corio, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
this Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Corio, Inc.

Dated: June 3, 2004



|/s/  GEORGEKADIFA
George KadifaPresident and Chief Executive Officer
|--------------------------------------------------------------------

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marco Community Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Stephen A. McLaughlin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the Report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                                               
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------
|Date: August 3, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Stephen A. McLaughlin                     
|                     |  |     |  | Stephen A. McLaughlin, Chief Executive
Officer
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 20 (Wednesday, January 30, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 479]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00237]



[[Page 479]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; PAR Panel: Understanding Alzheimer's Disease in the Context 
of the Aging, Metabolic Changes and Interactions between Brain and 
Systemic or Non-Neuronal Systems.
    Date: February 14, 2019.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Boris P. Sokolov, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5217A, MSC 7846, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-408-9115, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a7c5d4c8ccc8cbc8d1e7c4d4d589c9cecf89c0c8d1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bedccdd1d5d1d2d1c8feddcdcc90d0d7d690d9d1c8">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in 
advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of 
December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 22, 2019.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-00237 Filed 1-29-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 216 (Tuesday, November 9, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 64998]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24943]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL RATE COMMISSION


Briefing on New Postal Service Rollforward Model

AGENCY: Postal Rate Commission.

ACTION: Notice of public briefing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service will present a briefing and demonstration 
of its new PC-based rollforward model software on Tuesday, November 16, 
2004 at 10 a.m. in the Commission's hearing room. The briefing will 
address the history of the Postal Service's rollforward model, reasons 
why the new version was developed, and components of the new model. A 
question-and-answer session will follow. The meeting is open to the 
public.

DATES: Tuesday, November 16, 2004.

ADDRESSES: Postal Rate Commission (hearing room), 1333 H Street NW., 
Washington, DC 20268-0001, Suite 300.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, 
202-789-6818.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulatory History

    69 FR 7530, February 17, 2004.
    Earlier this year, the Postal Rate Commission gave a public 
demonstration of the new computer software model it has developed to 
handle the cost model/rollforward function in rate cases. The Postal 
Service has likewise been involved in updating its rollforward 
software. For the Postal Service, this would mean moving from a 
mainframe platform to a PC-based platform. This presentation will be 
quite similar in content and format to that provided by the Commission. 
As with the Commission's new software, the primary purpose of the 
Postal Service's new model is not to change the substance of the 
rollforward methodology, but rather to perform the same computational 
operations and achieve the same results using a different computer 
platform. The demonstration will use the rollforward model from the 
last omnibus rate case to illustrate how the model works.
    The Postal Service anticipates having a version of the model 
available on the Commission's Web site, http://www.prc.gov, so that 
interested observers can load the model and follow along on their own 
computers. There are a limited number of computer outlets in the 
hearing room which will be available for use during the presentation. 
Interested persons should contact Steven W. Williams at 202-789-6842.

Steven W. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04-24943 Filed 11-8-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Truman Townsend, Respondent, against Union Bag and Paper Corp. et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal by employer and its insurance carrier from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board which determined that claimant suffered an occupational disease which was causally related to his employment. Claimant’s duties in his employment required him to push a hand truck carrying fifty-gallon barrels of paste across a concrete floor. The evidence indicates that claimant suffered from a pre-existing susceptibility to pes planus third degree bilateral with metatarsalgia, commonly known as “fiat feet”. The nature of claimant’s work and the extra pressure exerted upon his feet aggravated the condition and caused it to become painful. The principal contention of appellants is that even though the work produced the pain it did not produce the condition, and therefore may not be considered an occupational disease. There is medical testimony, however, that the physical condition, aside from pain, was aggravated by the nature of claimant’s work. The decision of the board that claimant is suffering from an occupational disease contracted due to the nature of his employment, is sustained by the evidence. *(Matter of Vines*v. *Lazar Motors,*277 App. Div. 1083.) Decision unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Imrie, JJ.
### §152908. Restrictions

(a) Stock and Dividends.—The corporation may not issue stock or declare or pay a dividend.

(b) Political Activities.—The corporation or a director or officer as such may not contribute to, support, or participate in any political activity or in any manner attempt to influence legislation.

(c) Distribution of Income or Assets.—The income or assets of the corporation may not inure to the benefit of, or be distributed to, a director, officer, or member during the life of the charter granted by this chapter. This subsection does not prevent the payment of reasonable compensation to an officer or reimbursement for actual necessary expenses in amounts approved by the board of directors.

(d) Loans.—The corporation may not make a loan to a director, officer, or employee.

(e) Claim of Governmental Approval or Authorization.—The corporation may not claim congressional approval or the authority of the United States Government for any of its activities.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1421.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 152908(a) | 36:2908(d). | Oct. 30, 1984, Pub. L. 98–561, §8(a)–(e), 98 Stat. 2911. |
| 152908(b) | 36:2908(c). | |
| 152908(c) | 36:2908(a). | |
| 152908(d) | 36:2908(b). | |
| 152908(e) | 36:2908(e). | |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "any shares of" are omitted as unnecessary.

In subsection (c), the words "inure to the benefit of" are substituted for "inure to" for consistency in the revised title.
### §1121. Basic entitlement

The surviving spouse, child or children, and dependent parent or parents of any veteran who died before January 1, 1957 as the result of injury or disease incurred in or aggravated by active military, naval, or air service, in line of duty, during a period of war, shall be entitled to receive compensation at the monthly rates specified in section 1122 of this title.

(Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1122, §321; Pub. L. 92–197, §6, Dec. 15, 1971, 85 Stat. 662; Pub. L. 94–433, title IV, §404(12), Sept. 30, 1976, 90 Stat. 1378; renumbered §1121 and amended Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), (c)(1), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 406.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), renumbered section 321 of this title as this section.

Pub. L. 102–83, §5(c)(1), substituted "1122" for "322".

1976—Pub. L. 94–433 substituted "spouse" for "widow".

1971—Pub. L. 92–197 struck out eligibility clause when the veteran died after April 30, 1957, under circumstances described in section 417(a) of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1976 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 94–433 effective Oct. 1, 1976, see section 406 of Pub. L. 94–433, set out as a note under section 1101 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1971 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 92–197 effective Jan. 1, 1972, see section 10 of Pub. L. 92–197, set out as a note under section 1311 of this title.
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


         In connection with the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report of Superior Oil
and Gas Co. (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended  September 30,
2006 (the "Report"),  I, Daniel Lloyd,  Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,
hereby certify that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78o(d)); and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  November 17, 2006

                                             /s/ Daniel Lloyd
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Daniel Lloyd
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


         The above  certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss.1350)  and is not being filed as
part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report of Tranquility, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the "Report"), I, Dominick Pope, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/Dominick PopeDominick Pope, Chief Executive Officer Date: February 28, 2011
NRC BEGINS SPECIAL INSPECTION AT

MONTICELLO NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has started a Special Inspection to review the 

circumstances surrounding the blockage of a portion of the fire protection sprinkler system

located outside of the reactor building, in an intake structure that houses some safety-related 

equipment. 

The plant is operated by Northern States Power Company-Minnesota and is located in 

Monticello, Minn., 35 miles northwest of Minneapolis.

On Sept. 2, the company reported to the NRC that while performing testing of the intake 

structure fire suppression sprinkler system, workers identified blockage in a portion of the 

system. This piping supplies water from the Mississippi River to the sprinkler system in case of a 

fire in the building. The NRC staff determined that because this blockage could interfere with the 

sprinkler system’s ability to suppress a fire that could affect safety-related equipment and 

because there is also a potential generic concern, a special inspection was appropriate.

The company instituted a continuous compensatory fire watch and stationed backup fire 

suppression equipment in the intake building to make sure the plant could respond to a fire in 

this location.

A three-member NRC team that includes a fire protection specialist will evaluate the 

condition of the fire suppression system in the intake building, the plant’s compensatory 

measures and the root cause investigation; determine if other sprinkler systems in the plant have 

similar blockage; look into existence of previous occurrences of this issue and review previous 

corrective actions; and determine if there are generic implications for other plants.

“There is no immediate safety concern here,” NRC Region III Deputy Administrator 

Cynthia Pederson said. “Nevertheless, we want to gain a better understanding of this issue, how 

and why it occurred, and its implications for Monticello and for other plants.” 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region III

2443 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. III-11-033

Contact: Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil (630) 829-9663

September 13, 2011

E-Mail: OPA3.RegionIII@nrc.gov 
The NRC’s special inspection report documenting the team’s findings will be issued 

within 45 days of the inspection’s completion through the AGENCY DOCUMENTS ACCESS 

AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (ADAMS) at the NRC website.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.