alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### **CHAPTER 20—FINANCE**

Sec.
2001.
Definitions.
2002.
Capital of the Postal Service.
2003.
The Postal Service Fund.
[2004.
Repealed.]
2005.
Obligations.
2006.
Relationship between the Treasury and the Postal Service.
2007.
Public debt character of the obligations of the Postal Service.
2008.
Audit and expenditures.
2009.
Annual budget.
2009a.
Budgetary treatment of the Postal Service Fund.
2010.
Restrictions on agreements.
2011.
Provisions relating to competitive products.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2006**—Pub. L. 109–435, title IV, §401(a)(2), Dec. 20, 2006, 120 Stat. 3225, added item 2011.

**1997**—Pub. L. 105–33, title VII, §7003(a)(2)(A), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 663, struck out item 2004 "Transitional appropriations".

**1989**—Pub. L. 101–239, title IV, §4001(a)(2), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2133, added item 2009a.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Disposition of Savings Accruing to the United States Postal Service

Pub. L. 108–18, §3, Apr. 23, 2003, 117 Stat. 627, which provided for disposition of savings accruing to the United States Postal Service, was repealed by Pub. L. 109–435, title VIII, §804(a), Dec. 20, 2006, 120 Stat. 3253.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 16, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 67151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25352]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health, Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel Psychometric (IRT) Models for Clinical Studies.
    Date: December 1, 2004.
    Time: 3:43 p.m. to 5:20 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, (telephone conference 
call).
    Contact Person: Mark Czarnolewsi, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, Neuroscience 
Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 8122, MSC 9667, Bethesda, MD 
20892-9667, (301) 435-4582, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#117c726b70637f7e7d517c70787d3f7f78793f767e67"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="432e203922312d2c2f032e222a2f6d2d2a2b6d242c35">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, 
Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientists Development Award, 
Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientists 
Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 8, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-25352] Filed 11-15-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Brand Energy & InfrastructureServices, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the ‘Report”), I, Paul T. Wood, Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.               The Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.
| Date: November 2, 2006 |                               |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                   | /s/ Paul T. Wood                   |
|                   | Paul T. Wood                       |
|                   | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, |
|                   | President and Director             |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
### §901. Authority to prescribe rules for conduct and penalties for violations

(a)(1) The Secretary shall prescribe regulations to provide for the maintenance of law and order and the protection of persons and property on Department property.

(2) In this chapter, the term "Department property" means land and buildings that are under the jurisdiction of the Department and are not under control of the Administrator of General Services.

(b) Regulations under subsection (a) shall include—

(1) rules for conduct on Department property; and

(2) the penalties, within the limits specified in subsection (c), for violations of such rules.

(c) Whoever violates any rule prescribed by regulation under subsection (b)(1) shall be fined in accordance with title 18 or imprisoned not more than six months, or both. The Secretary may prescribe by regulation a maximum fine less than that which would otherwise apply under the preceding sentence or a maximum term of imprisonment of a shorter period than that which would otherwise apply under the preceding sentence, or both. Any such regulation shall apply notwithstanding any provision of title 18 or any other law to the contrary.

(d) The rules prescribed under subsection (a), together with the penalties for violations of such rules, shall be posted conspicuously on property to which they apply.

(e) The Secretary shall consult with the Attorney General before prescribing regulations under this section.

(f)(1) The Secretary may not prohibit the use of a covered service dog in any facility or on any property of the Department or in any facility or on any property that receives funding from the Secretary.

(2) For purposes of this subsection, a covered service dog is a service dog that has been trained by an entity that is accredited by an appropriate accrediting body that evaluates and accredits organizations which train guide or service dogs.

(Added Pub. L. 102–83, §2(a), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 397; amended Pub. L. 112–154, title I, §109, Aug. 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 1174.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Prior section 901 was renumbered section 2301 of this title.

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 218(a) of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 102–83, §2(a).

#### Amendments

2012—Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 112–154 added subsec. (f).
```

MOLDOVA GETS GSP STATUS

Moldova has been granted preferential treatment for its exports to the United
States under the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP).  President Clinton
signed a proclamation granting Moldova GSP status on July 28, 1995.  The GSP
grants duty-free access to 4,600 industrial and agricultural products from over 140
developing countries and territories.  Moldova will now be eligible to export all of
these products to the United States duty-free. GSP status has already been
granted to Armenia, Belarus, Kazakstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Ukraine, and
Uzbekistan.
```
NRC SEEKS PUBLIC COMMENT ON PROPOSED CHANGES TO REGULATIONS 

ON DISTRIBUTION OF URANIUM AND THORIUM 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is seeking public comment on proposed 

amendments to its regulations regarding the distribution and licensing of unenriched uranium and 

thorium (also known as source material). 

 The proposed rule, published July 26 in the Federal Register, would require specific 

licenses for the initial distribution of source material to exempt persons and certain general 

licensees. Such licenses would impose certain labeling and quality control requirements, as well 

as new reporting and recordkeeping requirements. 

The rule would also modify the existing possession and use requirements for the general 

license to possess source material. Current NRC regulations allow commercial and industrial 

firms, research, education and medical institutions, and federal, state and local government 

agencies to use and transfer up to 15 pounds of source material at any one time, and up to 150 

pounds in any one calendar year. The proposed rule would lower those possession limits to 1.5 

kilograms (3.3 pounds) and 7 kilograms (15.4 pounds) for source material in a dispersible form 

or being processed. 

Possession limits would not be changed for persons possessing source material in a solid, 

non-dispersible form (such as display samples of depleted uranium metal) or processing uranium 

from drinking water. 

The proposed rule would also exempt certain lenses coated with source material from 

licensing, though the manufacturers, some of whom are currently operating under a general 

license, would require a specific license. 

These new license requirements and possession limits are intended to help ensure the 

protection of public health and safety by ensuring that licensees safely possess source material 

and that the NRC has a better understanding of how much source material is being distributed 

annually. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-132 July 27, 2010
The proposed rule is available at this web address: 

http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-18223.pdf. 

Comments will be accepted for 120 days following publication in the Federal Register. 

Comments may be submitted over the federal government’s rulemaking Web site at 

http://www.regulations.gov using Docket ID NRC-2009-0084, by e-mail to 

Rulemaking.Comments@nrc.gov, or by fax to (301) 415-1101. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### JUL 24 1998 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
ERNESTINE MAULTSBY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,
v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, sued as State of Oklahoma, Defendant-Appellee. No. 97-6242 (D.C. No. CIV-96-1292-M) (W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before KELLY , BARRETT , and HENRY , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materiallyassist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The c ase is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.-2-

Plaintiff appeals the district court’s decision gra nting defendant summary judgment on plaintiff’s claims of race and age disc rimination, asserted under Title VII, see 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17, and the Age Discri mination in Employment Act, see 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-34. This court reviews a summary judgment decision de novo, viewing the record in th e light most favorable to the nonmoving party. See Sprague v. Thorn Americas, Inc. , 129 F.3d 1355, 1360-61 (10th Cir. 1997). Summary judgment is appropriate only if there are no genuinely disputed issues of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). Upon consideration of the record and the parties’ appellate arguments, we affirm the district court’s decision for substantia lly the reasons stated in that court’s order dated June 26, 1997. In doing so, we deny plaintiff’s motions seeking to supplement the record on appeal with evi dence not before the district court. See John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Weisman , 27 F.3d 500, 506 (10th Cir. 1994). Plaintiff asserts that the district court’s summaryjudgment decision was the result of her attorney’s incompetence. In a civil case such as this, however, plaintiff’s remedy for incompetent representation i s a malpractice action against her attorney. See MacCuish v. United States , 844 F.2d 733, 735-36 (10th Cir. 1988).-3-

The judgment of the United States District Court fo r the Western District of Oklahoma is, therefore, AFFIRMED. We grant plainti ff’s motion to supplement her opening brief with an appendix of cited authori ty. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court
Paul J. Kelly, Jr. Circuit Judge
§ 27.110 Expedited review procedures for certain kinds of research involving no more than minimal risk, and for minor changes in approved research. ( a ) The Secretary of HHS has established, and published as a Notice in the Federal Register, a list of categories of research that may be reviewed by the IRB through an expedited review procedure. The Secretary will evaluate the list at least every 8 years and amend it, as appropriate, after consultation with other federal departments and agencies and after publication in the Federal Register for public comment. A copy of the list is available from the Office for Human Research Protections, HHS, or any successor office.
( b ) ( 1 ) An IRB may use the expedited review procedure to review the following: ( i ) Some or all of the research appearing on the list described in paragraph (a) of this section, unless the reviewer determines that the study involves more than minimal risk;
( ii ) Minor changes in previously approved research during the period for which approval is authorized; or
( iii ) Research for which limited IRB review is a condition of exemption under § 27.104(d)(2)(iii), (d)(3)(i)(C), and (d)(7) and (8).
( 2 ) Under an expedited review procedure, the review may be carried out by the IRB chairperson or by one or more experienced reviewers designated by the chairperson from among members of the IRB. In reviewing the research, the reviewers may exercise all of the authorities of the IRB except that the reviewers may not disapprove the research. A research activity may be disapproved only after review in accordance with the nonexpedited procedure set forth in § 27.108(b).
( c ) Each IRB that uses an expedited review procedure shall adopt a method for keeping all members advised of research proposals that have been approved under the procedure.
( d ) The department or agency head may restrict, suspend, terminate, or choose not to authorize an institution's or IRB's use of the expedited review procedure.
### §150404. Board of directors

Subject to section 150406, the board of directors of the corporation, and the responsibilities of the board, shall be as provided in the constitution and bylaws of the corporation and in conformity with the laws under which the corporation is incorporated.

(Added Pub. L. 118–31, div. E, title LI, §5103(a), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 936.)
B.C.D. 02-79

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

BIRMINGHAM TERMINAL COMPANY

NOV 1 2 2002

This is the determination ofthe Railroad Retirement Board concerning the

continuing status ofthe Birmingham Terminal Company (BTC) (B.A. No. 4508)

as an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231, et seep)

(RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. § 351, et seep)

(RUIA). BTC was ruled to be an employer under the RRA and RUIA effective

July 1, 1901.

Mr. M. W. Jackson, Manager, Payroll Accounting, Norfolk Southern Corporation 

(NS) (B.A. No. 9408), reported that BTC was dissolved on June 1, 1986.

In accordance with the information set forth above, it is the determination ofthe

Railroad Retirement Board that Birmingham Terminal Company ceased to be an

employer under the RRA and RUIA on June 1, 1986, the date it was dissolved.

V. M. Speakman, Jr.

BA# 4508
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Silver Star Energy,  Inc. on
Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  September  30,  2005,  as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Robert
McIntosh, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/    Robert McIntosh
Robert McIntosh
President, CEO and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


November 4, 2005


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of New York Life Insurance Company, Appellant, Relative to Unemployment Insurance Contributions under Article 18 of the Labor Law. Frieda S. Miller, as Industrial Commissioner of the State of New York, Respondent. In the Matter of the Claim of Frank Goldstein et al. New York Life Insurance Company, Appellant; Frieda S. Miller, as Industrial Commissioner of the State of New York, Respondent.

*1053All concur.
#### Bishop et al. v. Caldwell.

February 24, 1948.

As Modified March 16, 1948.

Ray C. Lewis, Judge.

*856Charles C. Smith for appellants.

T. T. Burchell for appellee.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Cammack —

Affirming.

William Bishop died intestate in 1941. He left surviving him his widow and ° six children, of whom the appellee, Esther B. Caldwell, was one. Mrs. Bishop, who married John Couch shortly after her husband’s death, had not lived with her husband for some time prior to his death. Mr. Bishop made his home with Mrs. Caldwell. Seif Allen was living on the Bishop property, which consisted of some 70 acres, at the time of Mr. Bishop’s death. Shortly thereafter litigation arose concerning Mr. Bishop’s estate. In the settlement of that action, which was defended by Mrs. Caldwell, Mrs. Elizabeth Couch executed to Mrs. Caldwell a deed under which she conveyed to the latter all of her dower interest in the property. Only two tracts of land were referred to in that deed, but they were described as con* taining 70 acres. . When Seif Allen refused to vacate the property Mrs. Caldwell instituted a forcible entry and detainer proceeding against him in which she was successful. Allen took no steps questioning the validity of that action.

In this action Mrs. Caldwell set up claim to a five-sixths interest in the property and all of Mrs. Elizabeth Couch’s dower interest therein. It was finally adjudged that she was entitled to the relief sought and that her sister, Sarah Couch, was the owner of the remaining one-fifth interest. The statement of appeal shows that only'Grant Bishop, Bradie Bishop, and Sarah and John Couch are appealing.

It appears that the cases were consolidated below, but a separate appeal was filed by Allen which will be disposed of in a separate opinion.

Questions are raised as to whether Mrs. Elizabeth Couch’s dower deed covered all of her interest in the property, and whether that deed was made prematurely.

It seems that Mr. Bishop had acquired his property *857in three tracts. As we have noted, it was comprised of 70 acres, hut the dower deed, while referring to only two tracts, called for an interest in 70 acres. Mrs. Elizabeth Couch testified that she intended to and did convey all of her interest in the property to Mrs. Caldwell. She is raising no question as to the validity of the deed, and we fail to see how any of the appellants have in any way been prejudiced by the court’s ruling in favor of Mrs. Caldwell. Following Mr. Bishop’s death, litigation arose involving the title to his property, and, apparently, with the sanction of the court in that action, Mrs. Couch conveyed all of her dower interest in the property to Mrs. Caldwell. Under the circumstances, we think the chancellor properly disposed of the case.

Judgment affirmed.
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 **CERTIFICATION
                  PURSUANT TO****18
                  U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS
                  ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION
                  906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
                  2002**
  
 In
        connection with the Annual report of eRoomSystem Technologies, Inc. (the
        "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        David A. Gestetner, Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Secretary
        (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
        of
        the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
        to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  
 (2)  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  
 /s/
                  David A. Gestetner
              
              President,
                  Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and and Chairman of the
                  Board
              
              June
                    22, 2006David
                  A. Gestetner
              
              (Principal
                  Executive Officer and Principal
                Financial
                  and Accounting Officer)
   -65-
### §140. Stephen Foster Memorial Day

The President may issue each year a proclamation—

(1) designating January 13 as Stephen Foster Memorial Day; and

(2) calling on the people of the United States to observe Stephen Foster Memorial Day with appropriate ceremonies, pilgrimages to his shrines, and musical programs featuring his compositions.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1262.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 140 | 36:158. | Oct. 27, 1951, ch. 593, 65 Stat. 659. |

Section