alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 303
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 303 appear at 68 FR 56555, Oct. 1, 2003.

§ 303.15 Purpose. ( a ) This subpart implements the responsibilities of the Secretaries of Commerce and the Interior (“the Secretaries”) under Pub. L. 106-36, enacted 25 June 1999 which substantially amended Pub. L. 97-446, enacted 12 January 1983, amended by Pub. L. 89-805, enacted 10 November 1966, amended by Pub. L. 94-88, enacted 8 August 1975, amended by Pub. L. 94-241, enacted 24 March 1976, and amended by Pub. L. 103-465, enacted 8 December 1994, and Public Law 108-429, enacted on 3 December 2004.
( b ) The amended law provides for the issuance of certificates to insular jewelry producers who have met the requirements of the laws and regulations, entitling the holder (or any transferee) to obtain refunds of duties on any article imported into the customs territory of the United States duty paid except for any article containing a material which is the product of a country to which column 2 rates of duty apply. The amounts of these certificates may not exceed specified percentages of the producers' verified creditable wages in the insular possessions (90% of wages paid for the production of the first 300,000 duty-free units and declining percentages, established by the Secretaries, of wages paid for incremental production up to 10,000,000 units by each producer) nor an aggregate annual amount for all certificates exceeding $5,000,000 adjusted for growth by the ratio of the previous year's gross national product to the gross national product in 1982. However, the law specifies that watch producer benefits are not to be diminished as a consequence of extending the duty refund to jewelry manufacturers. In the event that the amount of the calculated duty refunds for watches and jewelry exceeds the total aggregate annual amount that is available, the watch producers shall receive their calculated amounts and the jewelry producers would receive amounts proportionately reduced from the remainder. Refund requests are governed by regulations issued by the Department of Homeland Security (see 19 CFR 7.4).
( c ) Section 2401(a) of Pub. L. 106-36 and additional U.S. note 5 to chapter 91 of the HTSUS authorize the Secretaries to issue regulations necessary to carry out their duties. The Secretaries may cancel or restrict the certificate of any insular manufacturer found violating the regulations.
[49 FR 17740, Apr. 25, 1984, as amended at 70 FR 67648, Nov. 8, 2005; 72 FR 16715, Apr. 5, 2007; 73 FR 34857, June 19, 2008]
§ 734.13 Export. ( a ) Except as set forth in § 734.17 or § 734.18, *Export* means: ( 1 ) An actual shipment or transmission out of the United States, including the sending or taking of an item out of the United States, in any manner;
( 2 ) Releasing or otherwise transferring “technology” or source code (but not object code) to a foreign person in the United States (a “deemed export”);
( 3 ) Transferring by a person in the United States of registration, control, or ownership of: ( i ) A spacecraft subject to the EAR that is not eligible for export under License Exception STA (*i.e.,* spacecraft that provide space-based logistics, assembly or servicing of any spacecraft) to a person in or a national of any other country; or
( ii ) Any other spacecraft subject to the EAR to a person in or a national of a Country Group D:5 country.
( b ) Any release in the United States of “technology” or source code to a foreign person is a deemed export to the foreign person's most recent country of citizenship or permanent residency.
( c ) The export of an item that will transit through a country or countries to a destination identified in the EAR is deemed to be an export to that destination.
[81 FR 35603, June 3, 2016]
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 4 (Monday, January 7, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 64]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-28475]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER19-680-000]


Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based Rate Filing 
Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization: CS Berlin Ops, 
Inc.

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
CS Berlin Ops, Inc.'s application for market-based rate authority, with 
an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is January 15, 2019.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an 
eSubscription link on the website that enables subscribers to receive 
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). 
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#20666572636f4e4c494e45735550504f525460464552430e474f56"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b3f5f6e1f0fcdddfdaddd6e0c6c3c3dcc1c7f3d5d6c1d09dd4dcc5">[email protected]</span></a> or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, 
call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: December 26, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-28475 Filed 1-4-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 10.20

SUMMARY OF THE COMPANY'S NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Non-employee directors are paid $2,000 for each Board meeting attended in person, $1,000 per Board meeting conducted by
telephone, $1,500 for each Audit Committee meeting attended, whether in person or by phone, $1,000 for each Compensation Committee, Nominating Committee or Special Committee meeting attended in person
and $500 for each Compensation Committee, Nominating Committee or Special Committee meeting conducted by telephone. In addition, the Chairman of the Audit Committee is paid an additional fee of $8,000
per year and the Chairman of the Compensation Committee is paid an additional fee of $4,000 per year for their services as such. All directors are reimbursed for their reasonable expenses related to
attendance at meetings.

In
accordance with the Company's 2009 Incentive Plan, any non-employee director first elected to the Board will receive a stock option award of 50,000 shares. Each year, as
of the date of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, each non-employee director will receive a stock option award of 15,000 shares. The number of shares that may be allocated to be awarded
to non-employee directors cannot exceed 20% of the maximum number of shares authorized under the 2009 Plan.

---



QuickLinks
### **CHAPTER 18—BENEFITS FOR CHILDREN OF VIETNAM VETERANS AND CERTAIN OTHER VETERANS**

Sec.
[1801.
Repealed.]

#### SUBCHAPTER I—CHILDREN OF VIETNAM VETERANS BORN WITH SPINA BIFIDA

1802.
Spina bifida conditions covered.
1803.
Health care.
1804.
Vocational training and rehabilitation.
1805.
Monetary allowance.
[1806.
Repealed.]

#### SUBCHAPTER II—CHILDREN OF WOMEN VIETNAM VETERANS BORN WITH CERTAIN BIRTH DEFECTS

1811.
Definitions.
1812.
Covered birth defects.
1813.
Health care.
1814.
Vocational training.
1815.
Monetary allowance.
1816.
Regulations.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—CHILDREN OF CERTAIN KOREA AND THAILAND SERVICE VETERANS BORN WITH SPINA BIFIDA

1821.
Benefits for children of certain Korea service veterans born with spina bifida.
1822.
Benefits for children of certain Thailand service veterans born with spina bifida.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—GENERAL PROVISIONS

1831.
Definitions.
1832.
Applicability of certain administrative provisions.
1833.
Treatment of receipt of monetary allowance and other benefits.
1834.
Nonduplication of benefits.
1835.
Advisory council.
1836.
Care and coordination teams.
1837.
Duration of health care and benefits provided.
1838.
Biennial report.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2023**—Pub. L. 118–18, §1(e), Oct. 6, 2023, 137 Stat. 105, added items 1835 to 1838.

**2019**—Pub. L. 116–23, §4(c)(2), June 25, 2019, 133 Stat. 971, substituted "CHILDREN OF CERTAIN KOREA AND THAILAND SERVICE VETERANS BORN WITH SPINA BIFIDA" for "CHILDREN OF CERTAIN KOREA SERVICE VETERANS BORN WITH SPINA BIFIDA" in item for subchapter III and added item 1822.

**2003**—Pub. L. 108–183, §102(d)(2), (e)(1), Dec. 16, 2003, 117 Stat. 2654, substituted "BENEFITS FOR CHILDREN OF VIETNAM VETERANS AND CERTAIN OTHER VETERANS" for "BENEFITS FOR CHILDREN OF VIETNAM VETERANS" in chapter heading, added item for subchapter III and item 1821, and redesignated former item for subchapter III and items 1821 to 1824 as item for subchapter IV and items 1831 to 1834, respectively.

**2000**—Pub. L. 106–419, title IV, §401(f)(1), (3), Nov. 1, 2000, 114 Stat. 1860, 1861, substituted "BENEFITS FOR CHILDREN OF VIETNAM VETERANS" for "BENEFITS FOR CHILDREN OF VIETNAM VETERANS WHO ARE BORN WITH SPINA BIFIDA" in chapter heading, added item for subchapter I, struck out items 1801 "Definitions" and 1806 "Applicability of certain administrative provisions", added item for subchapter II and items 1811 to 1816, and added item for subchapter III and items 1821 to 1824.

**1997**—Pub. L. 105–114, title IV, §404(b)(2), Nov. 21, 1997, 111 Stat. 2295, substituted "Applicability of certain administrative provisions" for "Effective date of awards" in item 1806.
### TEX A S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN
NO. 03-06-00079- CV Gerald Clayton Merwin a/ k/ a J erry Clayton Merwin, Ind ividu ally

and d/ b/ a P r e st on C arSt e r e o, App e lla nt

v. Nova Inf ormat ion S ystem s, Inc. , Appellee
FROM THE COU NTY COU RT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. 286, 595, HONO RABLE J . DAVID PHILLIPS, JUDGE PRESIDING

ME MO R

A ND UMO P I NI O N Appellant Ge r ald C layton M er win a/ k/ a Jer r y C layton M er win, Individually and d/ b/ a P r eston C ar S ter eo and Appellee N ova Infor mation S ystems, Inc. have a gr eed to se t aside the def ault judgment made the ba sis of this appe al and have filed a joint motion to set aside the tr ial cour t’s judgment and r emand this ca se to the tr ial cour t. We gr ant the motion, set aside the tr ial cour t’s judgment w ithout r egar d to the mer its, and r emand the ca use to the tr ial cour t. T ex. R. App. P . 42. 1(a) (2)( B ).

__________________________________________ B ob P ember ton, Justice B efor e C hief Justice L aw, Justices P ur year and P ember ton Vac ated a nd Remanded F iled: June 8, 2006
Regional Corner: Krasnoyarsk Krai, Russia

----

**November 1998**
by Azim Mamanov
Krasnoyarsk Krai is one of Russia's most attractive regions for foreign investment, given thecurrent foreign commercial presence in the area and the natural resources, industrial base, andunique transportation situation of the area.   Krasnoyarsk Krai, with a population of 3.5 million, islocated in the central part of Siberia.  The Krai is rich in natural resources and possesses a rangeof highly developed industries, which play leading roles in Russia's economy.  It  is consistentlyranked among the 10 regions with the highest gross domestic product (GDP) in Russia.
#### Reynold Pelletier *v.*Caron Pipe Jacking, Inc., et al.

*William F. Gallagher,*in support of the petition.

*Marjorie Howes Drake,*in opposition.

Decided February 25, 1988

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 13 Conn. App. 276, is denied.
|                                                                                                                                                             |  | BISNIS HOSTS YASIN                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|**BISNISHome PageSearchBISNISEmbassyReportsCountryReportsIndustryReportsPublicationsSourcesof FinanceLeadsand EventsExchangeRatesState ExportsOtherSources** |  | December 1997/January 1998Russian Government Minister-Without-Portfolio Yevgeniy Yasin (above)  met with a group of 50
U.S. business representatives December 1, 1997 at a roundtable in Washington, DC sponsored by
BISNIS and NationsBank.  Yasin, a senior economic advisor to Russian President Boris Yeltsin,
pointed  out that the Russian economy is strengthening, citing a growing financial stability and
sharply reduced inflation.  Yasin observed that the  Asian financial crisis has put pressure on the
Russian financial system and the ruble, but stressed that a stable ruble is a top priority for the
Russian Government.  He encouraged U.S. companies to invest in Russia's housing and
agriculture sectors, where he believes U.S. technology and expertise would be particularly
welcome.This report is provided courtesy of the Business Information Service for the Newly
Independent States (BISNIS)
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marco Community Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31,
2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Thomas M. Whelan, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |     |  |                                                                    
|----------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 3, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Thomas M. Whelan                                               
|                  |  |     |  | Thomas M. Whelan, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
§ 630.402 Advanced sick leave. ( a ) At the beginning of a leave year or at any time thereafter when required by the exigencies of the situation, an agency may grant advanced sick leave in the amount of: ( 1 ) Up to 240 hours to a full-time employee— ( i ) Who is incapacitated for the performance of his or her duties by physical or mental illness, injury, pregnancy, or childbirth;
( ii ) For a serious health condition of the employee or a family member;
( iii ) When the employee would, as determined by the health authorities having jurisdiction or by a health care provider, jeopardize the health of others by his or her presence on the job because of exposure to a communicable disease;
( iv ) For purposes relating to the adoption of a child; or
( v ) For the care of a covered servicemember with a serious injury or illness, provided the employee is exercising his or her entitlement under 5 U.S.C. 6382(a)(3).
( 2 ) Up to 104 hours to a full-time employee— ( i ) When he or she receives medical, dental or optical examination or treatment;
( ii ) To provide care for a family member who is incapacitated by a medical or mental condition or to attend to a family member receiving medical, dental, or optical examination or treatment;
( iii ) To provide care for a family member who would, as determined by the health authorities having jurisdiction or by a health care provider, jeopardize the health of others by that family member's presence in the community because of exposure to a communicable disease; or
( iv ) To make arrangements necessitated by the death of a family member or to attend the funeral of a family member.
( b ) Two hundred forty hours is the maximum amount of advanced sick leave an employee may have to his or her credit at any one time. For a part-time employee (or an employee on an uncommon tour of duty), the maximum amount of sick leave an agency may advance must be prorated according to the number of hours in the employee's regularly scheduled administrative workweek.
[75 FR 75373, Dec. 3, 2010]
**Exhibit
      32.2**





Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§1350)





I,
      Michael A. Reisner, Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
      Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of ICON Capital Corp.,
      the Manager of the Registrant in connection with the Quarterly Report of ICON
      Income Fund Ten, LLC (the "LLC") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September
      30,
      2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the "Quarterly Report") certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





1.
            The
                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                13(a) or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m);
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
                all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                the LLC.








*Dated:
      November 14, 2007*





*/s/Michael A. Reisner*


Michael
      A. Reisner


Director,
      Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Manager


(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)


ICON
      Capital Corp.


Manager
      of ICON Income Fund Ten, LLC
### §140401. Organization

(a) Federal Charter.—Military Officers Association of America (in this chapter, the "corporation"), a nonprofit organization that meets the requirements for a veterans service organization under section 501(c)(19) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and is organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, is a federally chartered corporation.

(b) Expiration of Charter.—If the corporation does not comply with the provisions of this chapter, the charter granted by subsection (a) shall expire.

(Added Pub. L. 111–95, §1(a), Nov. 6, 2009, 123 Stat. 3001.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 501 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, referred to in subsec. (a), is classified to section 501 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.
#### § 2006.6 Formal dispute settlement.

If the issues in a petition are covered by a trade agreement between the United States and the foreign government involved and a mutually acceptable resolution cannot be reached within the consultation period provided for in the agreement, or by 150 days after consultations begin, whichever is earlier, the Trade Representative shall institute the formal dispute settlement proceedings, if any, provided for in the trade agreement.
#### H. Leslie Wenger, Respondent, v. Pullman Company, Appellant.

Present — Glennon, J. P., Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [191 Mise. 937, affd. 194 Misc. 330.]
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** Honorable Myron H. Bright, Senior Circuit Judge, Un ited States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designat ion.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 8/9/96 FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. JAMES THEODORE WICKS, also known as James Theron Watts, also known as James Wicks, also known as James T. Wicks, also known as James Paul Egdahl, also known as Jimmy Ray Bertrano, also known as James Theron Wicks, also known as James Theodore Watts, also known as Theodore Theron Wicks, also known as Theodore T. Wicks,

Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-6332 (D.C. No. CR-91-176-A) (W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before PORFILIO, BRIGHT, ** and KELLY, Circuit Judges.-2-

After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The c ase is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. We affirm substantially for the reasons provided bythe district court. The judgment of the United States District Court fo r the Western District of Oklahoma is AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court
Paul J. Kelly, Jr. Circuit Judge