alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2293

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to prevent government agencies 

from requiring or prohibiting employers in the construction industry 

to enter into agreements with labor organizations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 2, 2003

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to prevent government agencies from requiring or prohibiting employers 

in the construction industry to enter into agreements 

with labor organizations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Government Labor 

5 Neutrality Act of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 2293 IH 

1 SEC. 2. MANDATE OF GOVERNMENT LABOR NEUTRALITY 

2 TOWARD EMPLOYERS COVERED UNDER THE 

3 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS ACT. 

4 Section 8(e) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 

5 U.S.C. 158(e)) is amended by adding at the end of the 

6 first proviso the following: ‘‘Provided further, That not7 withstanding any other provision of this Act, an agency 

8 or department of the Government, an agent acting on the 

9 Government’s behalf, a recipient of a Federal grant or fi10 nancial assistance, a person who has entered into a cooper11 ative agreements with the Government, a State or political 

12 subdivision thereof, shall not require or prohibit an em13 ployer in the construction industry to enter into an agree14 ment with a labor organization in connection with any con15 struction, alteration, painting, or repair work.’’.

Æ
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Brand Energy & InfrastructureServices, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the ‘Report”), I, Paul T. Wood, Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.               The Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.
| Date: August 11, 2006 |                               |
|----------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                       | /s/ Paul T. Wood                   |
|                       | Paul T. Wood                       |
|                       | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, |
|                       | President and Director             |

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

----
Integrated Safety Analysis: Why 

Appropriate for Fuel Recycling Faci

Rod McCullum, Nuclear Energy Institute

October 19, 2010 
Industry Recycle Task Force

 Formed in 2006 to work with NRC to address 

for regulatory framework for future recycling fa

 Shared industry recommended approach (Par

NRC in December 2008

 Interacting with NRC on staff Regulatory Gap 

Interacting with NRC on staff Regulatory Gap 

 Considers Gap #5 – risk analysis – to be a hig Submitted white paper Integrated Safety Anal

is it Appropriate for Fuel Recycling Facilities? 

September 2010 to advance the dialogue in th
Integrated Safety Analysis (IS

 Application proven for Part 70 fuel facilitie Systematic analysis

– Identifies hazards, accident sequences, and item

relied on for safety (IROFS)

– E t bli h lik lih d d f 

E

s

t

abli

s

hes lik

elihoo

d an

d consequences o

f even

– Assures appropriate safety controls are in place t

meet performance objectives

 Flexible methodology can be tailored to 

unique facilities
Probabilistic Risk Assessment (P

 Detailed, quantitative representation of facility 

 Relies on extensive databases of failure data 

established over time from numerous sources

 Is most effective where there are complex kn

inter

-dependencies between mechanical syst

dependencies between mechanical syst

hazardous inventories, and energy sources cof dispersing contaminants to the public

 If used within an ISA framework, a limited sco

could provide risk insights in the context of coaccident sequence frequencies for some sce
Industry Recommendation

 ISA is the most appropriate, cost-effective

and informative analytical tool for evaluat

risk and demonstrating safety performancrisk and demonstrating safety performanc

fuel recycling facilities
Editorial Note on Subpart C of Part 9701
Editorial Note: At 73 FR 58435, Oct. 7, 2008, the application of subpart C to part 9701 was rescinded.

§ 9701.321 Structure of bands. ( a ) DHS may, after coordination with OPM, establish ranges of basic pay for bands, with minimum and maximum rates set and adjusted as provided in § 9701.322. Rates must be expressed as annual rates.
( b ) For each band within an occupational cluster, DHS will establish a common rate range that applies in all locations.
### §90111. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the foundation for carrying out the purposes of this chapter—

(1) $5,000,000 for fiscal year 2003; and

(2) such sums as may be necessary for each succeeding fiscal year.

(Added Pub. L. 107–252, title VI, §601(a), Oct. 29, 2002, 116 Stat. 1721, §152611; renumbered §90111, Pub. L. 113–237, §3(c)(6)(B), Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 2840.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–237 renumbered section 152611 of this title as this section.
### §170511. Liability for acts of officers and agents

The corporation is liable for the acts of its officers and agents acting within the scope of their authority.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1446.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 170511 | 36:2509. | July 23, 1984, Pub. L. 98–372, §9, 98 Stat. 1240. |

Section
No. IV-10-031 

Contact: Victor Dricks: (817) 860-8128 

 Lara Uselding: (817) 276-6519 

 August 30, 2010

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

NRC PROPOSES $24,700 FINE FOR BASIN ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has proposed a fine of $24,700 against the Basin 

Electric Power Cooperative in connection with an incident in which several workers were exposed 

to radiation is excess of NRC limits at a coal-fired power plant in Wheatland, Wyo. 

Basin Electric has an NRC license authorizing it to use radioactive materials in gauges at the 

Laramie River Station to measure the flow of coal through chutes located between storage bunkers 

and pulverizers. The shutters of these gauges were not closed and locked prior to the licensee 

allowing welders to work around the gauges. 

Seventeen workers were exposed to radiation from the gauges between Sept. 7 and 18, 2009. 

While six received doses in excess of NRC regulatory limits, none of the workers are expected to 

experience long-term adverse health effects as a result of the exposures. 

“Protecting public health and safety is an important part of the NRC’s mission,” NRC 

Region IV Administrator Elmo E. Collins said in a letter to the licensee. “Because the event had a 

substantial potential for the welders to have received higher doses had they worked for longer 

periods in the vicinity of the nuclear gauges, this violation is of significant concern to the NRC.” 

NRC inspectors determined that several factors contributed to the violations of NRC 

regulations, including failure to close and lock the shutter mechanisms of the nuclear gauges as 

required, and failure to conspicuously post caution signs in areas where gauges were located. The 

licensee has taken corrective action to prevent recurrence. 

A pre-decisional enforcement conference was held with Basin Electric on July 14, to review 

the facts and circumstances surrounding the event. The licensee has 30 days to pay the proposed 

fine or challenge it. 

 The NRC’s letter, its enclosures and the licensee’s response will be made available to the 

public through the agency’s electronic reading room at: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/html. 

Help in accessing these documents is available from the NRC Public Document Room at 1-800-

397-4209. 

###

NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125 

Telephone: (817) 860-8128
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Fibria Celulose S.A. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Marcelo Strufaldi Castelli, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(i)                                     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)                                  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| By:    | /s/ Marcelo Strufaldi Castelli |                       |
|--------|--------------------------------|----------------------------|
|   | Name:                          | Marcelo Strufaldi Castelli |   |
|   | Title:                         | Chief Executive Officer    |   |

 

Dated: February 24, 2016

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Public Meeting with External Panelists on Safety Culture Policy Statement 

September 16, 2010 

Meeting Summary 

On September 16, 2010, a teleconference was held with several of the safety culture external 

panelists from the February 2-4, 2010 workshop on safety culture. Roy Zimmerman, Dave 

Solorio, Diane Sieracki, Catherine Thompson, Jose Ibarra and Maria Schwartz from OE, Molly 

Keefe from NRR, and Mauri Lemoncelli from OGC, were in attendance. The safety culture 

external panelists from the February workshop and members of the public were on 

teleconference. 

Roy Zimmerman opened the meeting by thanking the panelists for their participation and 

providing feedback and opinions on the proposed safety culture policy statement. He noted that 

the policy statement will be discussed at a Commission briefing on January 24, 2011. 

Jose Ibarra reviewed the upcoming public meeting scheduled for September 28 in Las Vegas. 

He discussed the agenda and noted that documents supporting the meeting would be emailed 

to the panelists and would also be available on the website. Details of the meeting, including 

how to view it on web streaming, or attending the meeting at the Rockville location, were 

discussed. 

Ken Koves (INPO) discussed the results of the INPO validation study. Ken reviewed how the 

study was conducted and how the data was analyzed. The “traits” that emerged from the study 

were compared with the traits that were identified by the external panelists at the February 2010 

workshop. Ken noted that there was a good correlation between the results of the INPO study 

and the February workshop. Val Barnes (RES) described the NRC’s review of the INPO 

validation study. The purpose of discussing this new information was to provide advance 

notification of information that would be discussed in more detail at the upcoming September 28 

public meeting. Office of Enforcement received preliminary reaction and feedback from the 

safety culture external panelists and members of the public regarding the potential usefulness 

and applicability of this information for incorporation into the efforts for developing the safety 

culture policy statement. 

After a discussion on some details of the study, including issues such as the measurability of 

the traits, the strength of the correlations, and similarities and differences between the two lists 

of traits, and meeting was adjourned. 

A more detailed presentation on the INPO validation study by Ken Koves was made at the 

September 28 public meeting. The presentation and meeting summary are available on the 

safety culture website http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/enforcement/safety-culture.html.
No. II-10-044 June 10, 2010 

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416 

NRC BEGINS SPECIAL INSPECTION AT BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PLANT 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has dispatched a Special Inspection Team to the 

Brunswick nuclear power plant, operated by Progress Energy near Southport on the southeastern 

coast of North Carolina. The team will review the circumstances associated with an event 

classified as an Alert at the plant on June 6. 

On Sunday, June 6, the Brunswick plant declared an Alert due to the discharge of halon 

gas, a fire suppressant, into the basement of the emergency diesel generator building. There was 

no fire at the facility and both units continued operation without interruption. Plant operators 

declared the Alert – the next to the lowest of NRC’s emergency classifications for commercial 

nuclear plants – within the time required by NRC regulations. However, the activation of the 

plant’s Emergency Response Organization was significantly delayed, as was the initiation of the 

plant’s Emergency Response Data System. 

The Alert was terminated after about 41⁄2 hours when operators had restored normal 

atmospheric conditions in the diesel generator building. No one was injured during the incident. 

The NRC’s Special Inspection Team is composed of two region-based inspectors. The 

team will review the circumstances surrounding the event and the licensee’s ensuing actions that 

led to the delay in activating their emergency response organization. 

The special inspection began Wednesday, June 9 and is expected to be completed this 

week. The NRC will issue a report within 45 days of the completion of the inspection. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

245 Peachtree Center Ave. NE, Suite 1200 

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
§ 630.504 Reestablishment of leave account after military service. ( a ) When an employee leaves his or her civilian position to enter the military service, the employing agency shall certify his or her leave account for credit or charge.
( b ) If the employee returns to a civilian position following military service, the agency to which the employee returns shall reestablish the certified leave account as a credit or charge (without regard to the date he or she left the civilian position) when the employee is— ( 1 ) Restored in accordance with a right of restoration after separation from active military duty or hospitalization continuing thereafter as provided by law or in accordance with the mandatory provisions of a statute, Executive order, or regulation; or
( 2 ) Reemployed in a position under subchapter I of chapter 63 of title 5, United States Code, on or after December 2, 1994.
( c ) For the purpose of documenting a returning employee's entitlement to a recredit of sick leave under this section, the documentation criteria established in § 630.502(g) shall apply.
[59 FR 62272, Dec. 2, 1994]
#### § 610.402 Coverage.

The regulations contained in this subpart apply only to flexible work schedules and compressed work schedules established under subchapter 11 of chapter 61 of title 5, United States Code.
|                                                                                                                                                                                     |  | Northwest Russia Business Delegation to Visit the U.S. in April 1999                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|**BISNISHome PageSearchBISNISEmbassyReportsCountryReportsIndustryReportsCustomsCornerPublicationsSourcesof FinanceFinanceLinkLeadsand EventsExchangeRatesState ExportsOtherSources** |  | March 1999The American Chamber of Commerce in Russia  will lead a delegation of Northwest Russian
businesses and government representatives to the United States during the second half of April.
The delegation, consisting of governors and business leaders from several oblasts in this region,
will travel to New York, Boston, and Washington, D.C., to foster trade and investment ties
between the United States and Northwest Russia.For more information, contact the American Chamber of Commerce in Russia: tel:  +7 (095)
961-2141; fax: +7 (095) 961-2142; email: [email protected].This report is provided courtesy of the Business Information Service for the Newly
Independent States (BISNIS)
### §7501. Establishment of scholarship program; purpose

(a) Establishment.—Subject to the availability of appropriations, the Secretary shall establish and carry out a scholarship program to provide financial assistance in accordance with this chapter to individuals who—

(1) are accepted for enrollment or currently enrolled in a program of study leading to a degree or certificate in visual impairment or orientation and mobility, or a dual degree or certification in both such areas, at an accredited (as determined by the Secretary) educational institution that is in a State; and

(2) enter into an agreement with the Secretary as described in section 7504 of this title.

(b) Purpose.—The purpose of the scholarship program is to increase the supply of qualified blind rehabilitation specialists for the Department and the Nation.

(c) Outreach.—The Secretary shall publicize the scholarship program to educational institutions throughout the United States, with an emphasis on disseminating information to such institutions with high numbers of Hispanic students and to Historically Black Colleges and Universities.

(Added Pub. L. 111–163, title III, §302(a), May 5, 2010, 124 Stat. 1146.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Implementation

Pub. L. 111–163, title III, §302(c), May 5, 2010, 124 Stat. 1149, provided that: "The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall implement chapter 75 of title 38, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), not later than 6 months after the date of the enactment of this Act [May 5, 2010]."
#### § 470.315 Project modification and extension.

OPM-approved projects permit the testing of alternative personnel systems and procedures in accordance with the provisions of the project plan. The provisions of approved project plans will not be modified, duplicated in organizations not listed in the project plan, or extended by agencies to individuals or groups of employees not included in the project plan without the approval of the Office of Personnel Management. OPM will inform the agency of notification responsibilities under § 470.307. The extent of notification requirements will depend on the nature and extent of the requested project modification.
#### Marion E. Lachs v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore and Bergan, JJ. [See 281 App.

Div. 633.]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0082

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DANIEL HUNTER FLANSBURG,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until December 5, 2022, to 

prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s reply brief.

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 31 2022

10/31/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0082
CUSTOMS VALUATION IN RUSSIA

----
EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-46750)  pertaining to the AvantGo, Inc. 2000 Employee Stock Purchase
Plan,  the 2000 Stock  Incentive  Plan,  the 1997  Stock  Option  Plan,  and the
GlobalWare  Computing,  Inc.  Stock Option Plan of our report dated  January 16,
2002,  with respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements  and schedule of
AvantGo,  Inc.,  included in this Annual  Report  (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2001.


                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Walnut Creek, California
March 27, 2002
### §5704. Transcript of trial records

The Secretary may purchase transcripts of the record, including all evidence, of trial of litigated cases.

(Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1237, §3304; renumbered §5704, Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §402(b)(1), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 238; Pub. L. 102–83, §4(b)(1), (2)(E), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 404, 405.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–40 renumbered section 3304 of this title as this section.

Pub. L. 102–83 substituted "Secretary" for "Administrator".