alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3562. Nonduplication of benefits

The commencement of a program of education or special restorative training under this chapter shall be a bar (1) to subsequent payments of compensation, dependency and indemnity compensation, or pension based on the death of a parent to an eligible person over the age of eighteen by reason of pursuing a course in an educational institution, or (2) to increased rates, or additional amounts, of compensation, dependency and indemnity compensation, or pension because of such a person whether eligibility is based upon the death or upon the total permanent disability of the parent.

(Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1201, §1762; Pub. L. 88–361, §4, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 298; Pub. L. 89–358, §3(a)(2), Mar. 3, 1966, 80 Stat. 20; renumbered §3562, Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 406.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–83 renumbered section 1762 of this title as this section.

1966—Pub. L. 89–358 redesignated former subsec. (a) as the entire section and deleted former subsec. (b) which prohibited payment of educational assistance allowance or special training allowance on behalf of any eligible person for any period paid for under other provision of law where the payment would constitute a duplication of benefits and which is now incorporated in section 1781 of this title.

1964—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 88–361 inserted "whether eligibility is based upon the death or upon the total permanent disability of the parent".
# L_2023057EN.01002501.xml

| 23.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 57/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 57/25

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 45/2020

of 20 March 2020

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2023/359]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1372 of 19 August 2019 implementing Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards monitoring and reporting (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1372 of 19 August 2019 implementing Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards monitoring and reporting (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1372 repeals Commission Decision (EU) 2009/442/EC (2), which is incorporated into the EEA Agreement and which is consequently to be repealed under the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1372 repeals Commission Decision (EU) 2009/442/EC (2), which is incorporated into the EEA Agreement and which is consequently to be repealed under the EEA Agreement.

| (3) | Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The text of point 1jb (Commission Decision 2009/442/EC) of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement is replaced by the following:

‘32019 D 1372: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1372 of 19 August 2019 implementing Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards monitoring and reporting (OJ L 220, 23.8.2019, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1372 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 21 March 2020, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 20 March 2020.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Clara GANSLANDT

---

(1)  
  OJ L 220, 23.8.2019, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 148, 11.6.2009, p. 18.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
RUSSIAN CUSTOMS: HOW MUCH--AND HOW--TO PAY

----

**July 1997**
by Derek Nowek
American goods destined for the Russian market are subject to numerous import taxes and feespayable to Russian Customs before they can be released to the importer.  The main types ofimport payments include customs duty, value added tax (VAT), excise tax, and customs clearancefees.  Which of these charges are actually levied depends in each case on the type of goodsimported, whether they are intended for resale or for the importer's own use, the final destinationof the goods (the domestic market or a free economic zone), and the legal status of theimporter.
**Main Types of Customs Charges**
**Customs Duty.**  Most goods imported into Russia are subject to a wide range ofcustoms duties. The duty rate ranges from zero to 30 percent for most goods, but can go up to100 percent for nearly pure alcohol.  This rate can be calculated as either a percentage of thecustoms value of goods or on the basis of the quantity of goods, reported in ecu (EuropeanCurrency Units) per item.
Customs value is the principal method used by Russian Customs to determine the value of ashipment.  The customs value includes the stated price of the particular goods plus any applicableshipping and handling fees included in the price of the shipment (calculated as CIF--cost,insurance, freight).  The importer must determine the customs value of the imported commodity. Customs value is used as a starting point for calculating customs duties, excise taxes, VAT,clearance fees, and any other levies that may apply.
**Excise Tax.**  This tax is levied on most imported luxury goods, such as cars, jewelry,alcoholic beverages, and tobacco products.  The excise rate can range from 10 percent forpassenger cars to 400 percent for alcoholic beverages.  When applicable, this tax can beexpressed--at the discretion of Russian Customs--as a percentage of the customs value of theimported goods or a specific rate on the basis of the quantity of goods in ecu, whichever ishigher.
**Customs Clearance Fees.**  Every importer must also pay a miscellaneous customsclearancefee equal to 0.1 percent of the customs value of the goods, payable in rubles, and anadditional tax of 0.05 percent of the customs value payable in foreign currency (see "PaymentProcedures" for details).
**Value Added Tax.**  VAT is applied to nearly all goods imported into Russia.  Thecurrent rate is 20 percent.  For certain food items, agricultural goods, and medicines, the effectiverate is 10 percent.  VAT is calculated on the total value of the goods, including customs duty,clearance fees, and excise tax, where applicable--in other words, after all other charges have beenadded to the customs value of the shipment.
**Payment Procedures**
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED
STATES CODE

      The following certification accompanies the issuer's Annual Report on Form
10-K and is furnished, not filed, as provided in SEC Release Nos. 33-8238,
34-47986 dated June 5, 2003:

      I, Joseph B. Feil, Assistant Vice President of Wilmington Trust Company,
trustee of the MetLife Policyholder Trust (the "Trust"), certify that (i) the
Trust's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the
"Annual Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the
Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Trust.



Date: March 30, 2004
                                By:   /s/ Joseph B. Feil
                                      ------------------------
                                      Joseph B. Feil
                                      Assistant Vice President
                                      Wilmington Trust Company



      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the MetLife Policyholder Trust and will be retained by the
MetLife Policyholder Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>




                                                                       EXHIBIT 5


                                  CERTIFICATION
                REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND
        SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

         Royal Group Technologies Limited (the "Company") is filing its annual
report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report")
with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

         I, Douglas Dunsmuir, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated: February 16, 2004

                                        /s/ Douglas Dunsmuir
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Douglas Dunsmuir
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>


                                  CERTIFICATION
                REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND
        SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

         Royal Group Technologies Limited (the "Company") is filing its annual
report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report")
with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

         I, Ronald Goegan, Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated: February 16, 2004

                                        /s/ Ronald Goegan
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Ronald Goegan
                                        Senior Vice-President and
                                        Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7087

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TOMMY STANLEY HERBERT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District

Judge. (CR-93-77-A, CA-95-746-AM)

Submitted: January 9, 1997 Decided: January 23, 1997

Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tommy Stanley Herbert, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser,

Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Tommy Stanley Herbert seeks to appeal the district court's

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994),

amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996,

Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.

Herbert, Nos. CR-93-77-A; CA-95-746-AM (E.D. Va. May 21, 1996). To

the extent that Appellant has appealed the district court's denial

of his petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to compel the district court to expedite consideration of his motion under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255, we dismiss the appeal as moot as the record reflects that

the district court has issued a final order from which Appellant

has noted a timely appeal. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
REMARKS OF NRC CHAIRMAN GREGORY B. JACZKO AT COMMISSION 

MEETING ON NRC EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY AND SMALL 

BUSINESS PROGRAMS 

Good morning. The Commission meets today to receive a briefing on the agency’s equal 

employment opportunity and small business programs. These are both very important initiatives 

for the agency and this is a very important meeting to hear about what has been done. Through 

the agency’s equal employment opportunity program, the NRC works hard to maintain a diverse 

and talented workforce and to provide all of our employees the opportunity to engage in 

challenging and meaningful work. Through our small business program, the agency 

demonstrates its commitment to affording maximum opportunities for small businesses – 

including those owned by the disadvantaged, women, and veterans – to participate in our 

contracting program. I want to recognize the staff’s high quality work on both these important 

initiatives. 

Note: Briefing slides for this meeting are now available on the NRC website at 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/commission/tr/2010/. A full transcript of the 

meeting will be available soon at this same web location. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-196 November 2, 2010
### §3007. Detention of mail for temporary periods

(a)(1) In preparation for or during the pendency of proceedings under section 3005, the Postal Service may, under the provisions of section 409(d), apply to the district court in any district in which mail is sent or received as part of the alleged scheme, device, lottery, gift enterprise, sweepstakes, skill contest, or facsimile check or in any district in which the defendant is found, for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction under the procedural requirements of rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

(2)(A) Upon a proper showing, the court shall enter an order which shall—

(i) remain in effect during the pendency of the statutory proceedings, any judicial review of such proceedings, or any action to enforce orders issued under the proceedings; and

(ii) direct the detention by the postmaster, in any and all districts, of the defendant's incoming mail and outgoing mail, which is the subject of the proceedings under section 3005.

(B) A proper showing under this paragraph shall require proof of a likelihood of success on the merits of the proceedings under section 3005.

(3) Mail detained under paragraph (2) shall—

(A) be made available at the post office of mailing or delivery for examination by the defendant in the presence of a postal employee; and

(B) be delivered as addressed if such mail is not clearly shown to be the subject of proceedings under section 3005.

(4) No finding of the defendant's intent to make a false representation or to conduct a lottery is required to support the issuance of an order under this section.

(b) If any order is issued under subsection (a) and the proceedings under section 3005 are concluded with the issuance of an order under that section, any judicial review of the matter shall be in the district in which the order under subsection (a) was issued.

(c) This section does not apply to mail addressed to publishers of newspapers and other periodical publications entitled to a periodical publication rate or to mail addressed to the agents of those publishers.

(Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 747; Pub. L. 106–168, title I, §105(a), Dec. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1810.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, referred to in subsec. (a)(1), is set out in the Appendix to Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

#### Amendments

1999—Pub. L. 106–168 added subsecs. (a) and (b), struck out former subsec. (a) which provided for injunctive relief and other orders by the district court in which the defendant gets his mail, and redesignated former subsec. (b) as (c).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1999 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 106–168 effective 120 days after Dec. 12, 1999, see section 111 of Pub. L. 106–168, set out as a note under section 3001 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1971, pursuant to Resolution No. 71–9 of the Board of Governors. See section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note preceding section 101 of this title.
NRC SEEKS PUBLIC COMMENT FOR UPDATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 

STATEMENT FOR NORTH ANNA NEW REACTOR APPLICATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is seeking public comment on an update to the Final 

Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (FSEIS) for a proposed third reactor at the North 

Anna site, near Mineral, Va.

NRC staff will consider written comments on environmental issues until March 9, following 

the publication of a Federal Register notice (http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2011/pdf/2011-2599.pdf).

Please include Docket ID NRC-2008-0419 with your comment, via the http://www.regulations.gov

website, by mail to the Chief, Rules and Directives Branch, Division of Administrative Services, 

Office of Administration, Mailstop TWB-05-B01M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 

Washington, DC 20555-0001, via e-mail at NorthAnnaCOLEIS@nrc.gov, or via fax to 

(301) 492-3446.

In applying for a Combined License (COL) for North Anna Unit 3, Dominion Virginia 

Power referenced the North Anna Early Site Permit (ESP) the NRC issued in November 2007. In 

order to supplement the ESP's environmental findings, the NRC reviewed the COL application’s 

environmental information, issuing the FSEIS in March 2010. Dominion revised the application in 

June 2010 to reflect a change in reactor design from GE-Hitachi’s Economic Simplified Boiling 

Water Reactor to Mitsubishi’s U.S. Advanced Pressurized Water Reactor (US-APWR). The USAPWR is a 1,500 MWe design currently under NRC review for possible certification. The staff will 

consider any findings concerning the design in reviewing the North Anna application. Information 

on the US-APWR application is available on the NRC website at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors/design-cert/apwr.html.

The NRC’s examination of environmental issues is only part of the overall North Anna COL 

review. The agency staff continues to develop its final safety evaluation report, incorporating 

recommendations from the NRC’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards. The NRC’s Atomic 

Safety and Licensing Board is also considering possible legal challenges to the revised application; 

the Board must complete its work before the NRC can reach a final decision on Dominion’s 

application.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: http://www.nrc.gov/publicinvolve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to 

subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-019 February 8, 2011
EXHIBIT32

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Interbank Capital Corp. (the "Company")on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

-  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andThe information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the        Company.
/s/Anthony N.DeMint                            

AnthonyN. DeMint

Presidentand Chief Accounting Officer

February6, 2004
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-001 January 5, 2005

NRC ESTABLISHES WEB PAGE FOR INFORMATION ON

SAFETY-CONSCIOUS WORK ENVIRONMENT AT SALEM/HOPE CREEK

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Web site now includes a page devoted to the topic of

safety-conscious work environment (SCWE) at nuclear power plants, with a focus on the NRC’s

ongoing review at the Salem and Hope Creek plants in New Jersey.

The new page provides the history of SCWE at the Salem and Hope Creek site, operated by

PSEG Nuclear, since the NRC’s Region I office initiated its review in early 2004. The page provides

easy references for the public and other stakeholders to access information and documents on several

topics, including:

– Ongoing activities;

– Correspondence with PSEG;

– Correspondence with the public;

– Public meetings;

– Frequently asked questions, and

– Performance of Salem and Hope Creek.

The page can be found on the NRC web site here: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/plant-specific-items/hope-creek-salem-issues.html .

###
###### Editorial Note on Subpart C of Part 9701

#### Editorial Note:

At 73 FR 58435, Oct. 7, 2008, the application of subpart C to part 9701 was rescinded.

#### § 9701.333 Special rate supplements.

DHS will, after coordination with OPM, establish special rate supplements that provide higher pay levels for subcategories of employees within an occupational cluster if DHS determines that such supplements are warranted by current or anticipated recruitment and/or retention needs. In exercising this authority, DHS will issue necessary implementing directives. Any special rate supplement must be treated as basic pay for the same purposes as locality rate supplements, as described in § 9701.332(c), and for the purpose of computing cost-of-living allowances and post differentials in nonforeign areas under 5 U.S.C. 5941.
### SUBCHAPTER II—ELIGIBILITY AND ENTITLEMENT