alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 844.202 Agency-filed disability retirement applications. ( a ) *Basis for filing an application for an employee.* An agency must file an application for disability retirement of an employee who has 18 months of Federal civilian service when all of the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) The agency has issued a decision to remove the employee;
( 2 ) The agency concludes, after its review of medical documentation, that the cause for unacceptable performance, attendance, or conduct is disease or injury;
( 3 ) The employee is institutionalized, or the agency concludes, based on a review of medical and other information, that the employee is incapable of making a decision to file an application for disability retirement;
( 4 ) The employee has no personal representative or guardian; and
( 5 ) The employee has no immediate family member who is willing to file an application on his or her behalf.
( b ) *Agency procedures.* ( 1 ) When an agency issues a decision to remove an employee and not all of the conditions described in paragraph (a) of this section have been satisfied, but the removal is based on reasons apparently caused by a medical condition, the agency must advise the employee in writing of his or her possible eligibility for disability retirement and of the time limit for filing an application.
( 2 ) If all of the conditions described in paragraph (a) of this section have been met, the agency must inform the employee in writing at the same time it informs the employee of its removal decision, or at any time before the separation is effected, that: ( i ) The agency is submitting a disability retirement application on the employee's behalf to OPM;
( ii ) The employee may review any medical information in accordance with § 294.106(d) of this chapter; and
( iii ) The action does not affect the employee's right to submit a voluntary application for disability retirement or any other retirement benefit to which the employee is entitled under FERS.
( 3 ) When an agency submits an application for disability retirement to OPM on behalf of an employee, it must provide OPM with copies of the decision to remove the employee, the medical documentation, and any other documents needed to show that the cause for removal results from a medical condition. Following separation, the agency must provide OPM with a copy of the documentation of the separation.
( c ) *OPM procedures.* ( 1 ) OPM will not act on any application for disability retirement filed by an agency on behalf of an employee until it receives the appropriate documentation of the separation. When OPM receives a complete application for disability retirement under this section, it will notify the former employee that it has received the application and that he or she may submit medical documentation. OPM will determine entitlement to disability benefits under § 844.203.
( 2 ) OPM will cancel any disability retirement when a final decision of an administrative authority or court reverses the removal action and orders the reinstatement of an employee to the agency rolls.
#### § 325.13 Nonadmissibility in evidence.

If the Secretary denies, in whole or in part, an application for a certificate or for an amendment to a certificate, or revokes or amends a certificate, neither the negative determination nor the statement of reasons therefor shall be admissible in evidence in any administrative or judicial proceeding in support of any claim under the antitrust laws.
### §3207. Limit of weight of penalty mail; postage on overweight matter

(a) Penalty mail is restricted to articles not in excess of the weight and size prescribed for that class of mail receiving high priority in handling and delivery, except—

(1) stamped paper and supplies sold or used by the Postal Service; and

(2) books and documents published or circulated by order of Congress when mailed by the Superintendent of Documents.

(b) A penalty mail article which is—

(1) over 4 pounds in weight;

(2) not in excess of the weight and size prescribed for mail matter; and

(3) otherwise mailable;

is mailable at rates for that class of mail entitled to the lowest priority in handling and delivery, even though it may include written matter and may be sealed.

(Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 753.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1971, pursuant to Resolution No. 71–9 of the Board of Governors. See section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note preceding section 101 of this title.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 20, 2023

No. 04-23-00811-CR

IN RE JOHN GILBERT CENTENO JR., RELATOR

Original Proceeding1

ORDER

Relator’s writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. 

It is so ORDERED on September 20, 2023.

_____________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 20th day of September, 2023.

_____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court

1

This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2021-CR-11020, styled State v. John Gilbert Centeno, Jr., pending in the 

186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Andrew Carruthers presiding.
# L_2017161EN.01006701.xml

| 22.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 161/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 161/67

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 279/2015

of 30 October 2015

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2017/1068]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1014 of 25 June 2015 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 establishing the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Community (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1014 of 25 June 2015 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 establishing the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Community (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 66zab (Commission Regulation (EC) No 474/2006) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32015 R 1014: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1014 of 25 June 2015 (OJ L 162, 27.6.2015, p. 65).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32015 R 1014: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1014 of 25 June 2015 (OJ L 162, 27.6.2015, p. 65).’

Article 2

The texts of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1014 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 November 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 October 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 162, 27.6.2015, p. 65.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 9, 2010

p0830 

# Order

September 9, 2010

141025

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141025 COA: 294440 Wayne CC: 04-010421-01 CHARLES PAYTON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the March 31, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

D AVIS



### , J., not participating. I recuse myse lf and am not participating because I was on the Court of Appeals panel in this case. See MCR 2.003(B).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 15, 2004, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), the American Society of Sanitary Engineering (“ASSE”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) The name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) The nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: American Society of Sanitary Engineering, Westlake, OH. The nature and scope of ASSE's standards development activities are: the creation, promotion and issuance of standards and seals of approval with respect to plumbing, water supply, sewage disposal, water purification, drainage, fire protection and medical gasses.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-25079 Filed 11-9-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
# L_2023073EN.01003401.xml

| 10.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 73/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 73/34

---

DECISION No 2019/1 OF THE REGIONAL STEERING COMMITTEE OF THE TRANSPORT COMMUNITY

(following a written consultation)

on the adoption of the budget of the Transport Community for the year 2019 [2023/551]

THE REGIONAL STEERING COMMITTEE OF THE TRANSPORT COMMUNITY,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the Transport Community, and in particular Article 24(1) and Article 35 thereof,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The budget of the Transport Community for the year 2019, attached to this Decision, is hereby adopted.

Article 2

The European Commission shall be in charge of implementing the budget and of the initiation of the work of the Permanent Secretariat of the Transport Community in accordance with Article 3.

Article 3

Article 2 shall apply from 24 January 2019. It shall cease to apply on the day prior to that on which the appointment of the Director of the Permanent Secretariat becomes effective.

Done in Tirana, on 16 January 2019.

For the Regional Steering Committee

The President

---

APPENDIX

Budget of the Transport Community for the year 2019

| Budget line | Amount (EUR) |
| --- | --- |
| Salaries for officials | 750 000 |
| Contribution to Health / Pension scheme for officials | 200 000 |
| Running costs of the secretariat (including fixed expenditure / travel / meeting organisation) | 330 000 |
| Office IT equipment and furniture (not covered by the HQ Agreement) | 100 000 |
| Recruitment costs (publication and reimbursement of candidates) | 100 000 |
| Total | 1 480 000 |
| Reserve (approximately 10 %) | 150 000 |
| Grand total | 1 630 000 |
| Of which: EU contribution (80 %)
   (*1) | 1 304 000 |
| WB6 contribution (20 %: annex V of TCT provides the distribution per country). | 326 000 |

Budget line

Amount (EUR)

Salaries for officials

750 000

Contribution to Health / Pension scheme for officials

200 000

Running costs of the secretariat (including fixed expenditure / travel / meeting organisation)

330 000

Office IT equipment and furniture (not covered by the HQ Agreement)

100 000

Recruitment costs (publication and reimbursement of candidates)

100 000

Total

1 480 000

Reserve (approximately 10 %)

150 000

Grand total

1 630 000

Of which: EU contribution (80 %)
   (*1)

1 304 000

WB6 contribution (20 %: annex V of TCT provides the distribution per country).

326 000

---

(*1)  The figure of the EU contribution is without prejudice of the adoption of the EU budget for 2019.

---
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**








**Performance
      Capital Management, LLC**





CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


PRINCIPAL
      FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Performance Capital
      Management, LLC (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30,
      2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”), David J. Caldwell, as Chief Operations Officer of the Company,
      and Edward M. Rucker, as Accounting Manager of the Company, each hereby
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/
                David J. CaldwellDavid
                J. CaldwellChief
                Operations OfficerNovember
                13, 2007







/s/
                Edward M. RuckerEdward
                M. RuckerAccounting
                ManagerNovember
                13, 2007







The
      material contained in this exhibit is not deemed “filed” with the Commission and
      is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under
      the
      Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      as
      amended, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any
      general incorporation language contained in such filing, except to the extent
      that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
### §1161. Payment of disability compensation in disability severance cases

The deduction of disability severance pay from disability compensation, to the extent required by section 1212(d) of title 10, shall be made at a monthly rate not in excess of the rate of compensation to which the former member would be entitled based on the degree of such former member's disability as determined on the initial Department rating.

(Added Pub. L. 91–241, May 7, 1970, 84 Stat. 203, §361; amended Pub. L. 94–433, title IV, §404(23), Sept. 30, 1976, 90 Stat. 1379; Pub. L. 98–160, title VII, §702(4), Nov. 21, 1983, 97 Stat. 1009; renumbered §1161 and amended Pub. L. 102–83, §§4(a)(3), (4), 5(a), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 404, 406; Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title XVI, §1646(c), as added Pub. L. 110–389, title I, §103(a)(2), Oct. 10, 2008, 122 Stat. 4148.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2008—Pub. L. 110–181, §1646(c), as added by Pub. L. 110–389, §103(a)(2), substituted "to the extent required by section 1212(d) of title 10" for "as required by section 1212(c) of title 10".

1991—Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), renumbered section 361 of this title as this section.

Pub. L. 102–83, §4(a)(3), (4), substituted "Department" for "Veterans' Administration".

1983—Pub. L. 98–160 struck out "United States Code," after "title 10,".

1976—Pub. L. 94–433 substituted "such former member's" for "his".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2008 Amendment

Pub. L. 110–389, title I, §103(b), Oct. 10, 2008, 122 Stat. 4148, provided that: "The amendments made by subsection (a) [adding section 1646(c) to Pub. L. 110–181 and provisions set out as a note under section 1212 of Title 10, Armed Forces] shall take effect on January 28, 2008 (the date of the enactment of the Wounded Warrior Act [title XVI of Pub. L. 110–181]), as if included in that Act, to which they relate."

Amendment by section 1646(c) of Pub. L. 110–181 effective Jan. 28, 2008, and applicable with respect to members of the Armed Forces separated from the Armed Forces under chapter 61 of title 10, United States Code, on or after that date, see section 1646(d) of Pub. L. 110–181, set out as a note under section 1212 of Title 10, Armed Forces.

#### Effective Date of 1976 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 94–433 effective Oct. 1, 1976, see section 406 of Pub. L. 94–433, set out as a note under section 1101 of this title.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                                                                         Page 20


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Report of Allegheny Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
A. Loving, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

          1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

          No purchaser or seller of securities or any other person shall be
entitled to rely upon the foregoing certification for any purpose. The
undersigned expressly disclaim any obligation to update the foregoing
certification except as required by law.


                                        /s/ WILLIAM A. LOVING. JR.
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        William A. Loving, Jr.
                                        Chief Executive Officer

                                        August 9, 2007
BISNIS Trades & Tenders, July 27, 1998 - PART 1

----

INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT, U.S. & FOREIGN COMMERCIAL SERVICE AND U.S.DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 1997.  ALL RIGHTS RESERVED OUTSIDE OF THE UNITEDSTATES.
THE BUSINESS INFORMATION SERVICE FOR THE NEWLY INDEPENDENT STATES (BISNIS) ISTHE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE'S INFORMATION CLEARINGHOUSE ON TRADE ANDINVESTMENT IN THE EMERGING MARKETS OF THE NEWLY INDEPENDENT STATES OF THEFORMER SOVIET UNION.  BISNIS HAS CREATED THE BISNIS TRADES AND TENDERSELECTRONIC NEWSLETTER TO HELP U.S. COMPANIES FIND BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES INTHESE EXPANDING MARKETS.
THESE OPPORTUNITIES ARE PROVIDED SOLELY AS AN INFORMATIONAL SERVICE AND DONOT REPRESENT AN ENDORSEMENT BY THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE.VERIFICATION OF LEADS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE READER. BISNIS MAY CONSIDEROTHER PRIVATE SECTOR-GENERATED TRADE LEADS AND TENDERS, IN ELECTRONIC FORMONLY, AND PUBLISH ON A SPACE-AVAILABLE BASIS. PLEASE SEND YOUR LEADS TO[email protected]
§ 890.1408 Change in enrollment type, plan, or option. ( a ) A tribal employee enrolled under this subpart may increase or decrease his or her enrollment, or may change enrollment from one plan or option to another, as described in § 890.301 (for tribal employees who did not elect premium conversion) or part 892 of this chapter (for tribal employees who did elect premium conversion).
( b ) A change in enrollment type, plan, or option under this section becomes effective as described in § 890.301 (for tribal employees who did not elect premium conversion) or part 892 of this chapter (for tribal employees who did elect premium conversion).
NRC CONTINUES TO TRACK EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI ISSUES

Senior officials at U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission headquarters in Rockville, Md., 

are following events related to the Japanese earthquake and subsequent tsunami. In addition, the 

agency’s regional office in Arlington, Texas, will continue to monitor the Diablo Canyon Power 

Plant’s handling of a notice of unusual event (NOUE) at the site, near San Luis Obispo, Calif., 

for the duration of the event.

“We offer our condolences to all those in Japan affected by these tragedies,” said NRC 

Chairman Gregory Jaczko. “The NRC is ready to provide whatever assistance we can to our 

Japanese counterparts, should there be a specific request. We’re closely coordinating with other 

federal agencies.”

Friday’s tsunami warning, issued after an estimated 8.9 magnitude earthquake occurred 

off the eastern Japanese coast, prompted Pacific Gas and Electric Co. (PG&E), operator of the 

Diablo Canyon two-reactor plant, to declare a precautionary NOUE at 4:23 a.m. EST Friday.

PG&E has reported both reactors have remained online throughout the event. While PG&E has 

reported only minor tsunami-related effects, the plant is well-protected against tsunami 

conditions as required by NRC regulations. NRC staff at the plant are keeping track of the 

plant’s response during the event and remain in close contact with plant operators.

Nuclear power plants are built to withstand environmental hazards, including earthquakes 

and tsunamis. Even those plants that are located outside of areas with extensive seismic activity

are designed for safety in the event of such a natural disaster. The NRC requires that safetysignificant structures, systems, and components be designed to take into account the most severe 

natural phenomena historically reported for the site and surrounding area. 

In addition to the Diablo Canyon plant, the NRC is following events at the San Onofre 

nuclear power plant, the Humboldt Bay spent fuel storage site and NRC-regulated nuclear 

materials sites in Hawaii and Alaska to name a few. Personnel at all those sites have informed 

the NRC conditions remain safe.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-043 March 11, 2011