alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit     32.2          Certification.

Certification  of  Chief  Accounting  Officer  of  UCELLIT.COM  INC.,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Section 1350 of 18
U.S.C.  63.
I,  Mark  Epstein,  the  Chief  Accounting  Officer  of UCELLIT.COM INC. hereby
certify that UCELLIT.COM INC.'s periodic report on Form 10-KSB and the financial
statements  contained  therein  fully  complies with the requirements of Section
13(a)  or  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)
and  that  information  contained  in the periodic report on Form 10-KSB and the
financial  statements  contained  therein  fairly  represents,  in  all material
respects,  the  financial condition and results of the operations of UCELLIT.COM
INC.


Date:  December  22,  2003
(signed)____________________
Mark  Epstein
/s/  Mark  Epstein
Chief  Accounting  Officer  of
UCELLIT.COM  INC.

A  signed  original  of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  UCELLIT.COM  INC.  and  will  be  retained by UCELLIT.COM INC. and
furnished  to  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




<PAGE>
§ 2011.203 Issuance of specialty sugar certificates. ( a ) Specialty sugars imported into the United States from specialty sugar source countries may be entered only if such specialty sugars are accompanied by a certificate issued by the Certifying Authority.
( b ) A certificate may be issued to an importer who complies with the provisions of this part. The certificate may contain such conditions, limitations or restrictions as the Certifying Authority, in his discretion, deems necessary. The Certifying Authority will issue a certificate if sufficient evidence has been provided to permit the Certifying Authority to make a reasonable determination that the sugar proposed to be imported under the certificate fits the definition of specialty sugars in this subpart.
( c ) Subject to quota availability, an unlimited number of complying shipments may enter under a given certificate and a given certificate may cover more than one type of specialty sugar. Issuance of a certificate does not guarantee the entry of any specific shipment of specialty sugar, but only permits entry of such sugar if the amount allocated to the specialty sugar source country is not already filled.
[55 FR 40648, Oct. 4, 1990, as amended at 61 FR 26785, May 29, 1996]
SAKHALIN LEADS THE WAY

----

**September 1997**
by Tanya Shuster
Sakhalin Island's offshore oil and gas projects are among the biggest commercial news these daysin the Russian Far East (RFE)--and  in much of Russia.  While a number of natural resourcedevelopment projects have signed production sharing agreements, the Sakhalin I and II projects,worth roughly $25 billion in foreign investment, are the only two that are actually moving forwardbased on such agreements.  Perhaps even more important, they are expected to create a boom thatwill resuscitate many troubled RFE enterprises and greatly expand opportunities for U.S.companies.  Although the projects are still in their early phases and the road ahead has numerousobstacles, interested U.S. firms should act early and carefully to position themselves to takeadvantage of opportunities when they arise. 
Sakhalin I and II will develop five oil and gas fields northeast of Sakhalin Island.  The fields aresaid to contain 400 million tons of crude oil and gas condensate and 830 billion cubic meters ofnatural gas.  Sakhalin I, estimated to be worth $15 billion in foreign investment, will develop threefields believed to contain 310 million tons of oil and 335 billion cubic meters of natural gas.  Thetwo Sakhalin II fields contain 100 million tons of hydrocarbon liquids and 494 million cubicmeters of gas, and will draw $10 billion in investment from the four project participants,Marathon (U.S.), Mitsui (Japan), Shell (Netherlands), and Diamond Gas Sakhalin(Japan).
**Significance of Sakhalin I and II**
---

(Euro 12,000.00)

Addendum to the loan agreement dated 20/09/2006

Extension

LOAN AGREEMENT

between

Mr. Dieter Thiemann Pöppelmannstrasse 4 33428
Harsewinkel

- in the following referred to as
lender -

and

EDI Exploration Drilling International GmbH, represented by
the Managing Director Günter Thiemann Goethestrasse 61, 45721 Haltern am
See

- in the following referred to as borrower -

The loan agreement, to which this addendum applies, shall be
extended in item 1 as follows:

The term of the loan ends on 31/03/2009. An extension by 3
months is to be renegotiated at that time.

All other provisions of the agreement remain unchanged and
valid.

Haltern, 22/06/2008

|[Signature]                                 |  | [Signature]    
|------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------
|                                            |  |                
|Borrower                                    |  | Lender         
|EDI Exploration Drilling International GmbH |  | Dieter Thiemann

[File name]

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS.1350

AND EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(b)

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350 and Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act), I, the undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer of Visteon Corporation (the Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year
ended December 31, 2014 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ Timothy D. Leuliette
|Timothy D. Leuliette    
|                        
|April 30, 2015
### SUBCHAPTER IV—PEACETIME DISABILITY COMPENSATION
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

      ( print page 65673)    
Notice is hereby given that Telesoft Partners II SBIC, L.P., 1450 Fashion Island Blvd., Suite 610, San Mateo, CA 94404, a Federal Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (“the Act”), in connection with the financing of a small concern, has sought an exemption under Section 312 of the Act and Section 107.730, Financings which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). Telesoft Partners II SBIC, L.P. proposes to provide equity/debt security financing to CreekPath Systems, Inc. The financing is contemplated for working capital and general corporate purposes.

The financing is brought within the purview of § 107.730(a)(1) of the Regulations because Telesoft Partners II QP, L.P., Telesoft Partners II, L.P. and Telesoft NP Employee Fund, LLC, all Associates of Telesoft Partners II SBIC, L.P., own more than ten percent of CreekPath Systems, Inc.

Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit written comments on the transaction to the Associate Administrator for Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416.

Dated: November 2, 2004.

Jeffrey Pierson,

Associate Administrator for Investment.

[FR Doc. 04-25228 Filed 11-12-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. William J. Fitzgerald, Respondent, v. Arthur Woods, as Police Commissioner of The City of New York, Appellant.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and relator’s motion denied, with twenty-five dollars costs. See opinion in *People ex rel. Walter*v. *Woods (ante,*p. 3), decided herewith. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 24 (Thursday, February 5, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 5462-5463]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2515]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2003-16505; Airspace Docket No. 03-ACE-89]


Modification of Class E Airspace; Cherokee, IA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of the direct final 
rule which revises Class E airspace at Cherokee, IA.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, April 15, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Randolph, Air Traffic Division, 
Airspace Branch, ACE-520C, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal 
Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: 
(816) 329-2525.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on December 12, 
2003 (68 FR

[[Page 5463]]

69305). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-
controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse 
public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no 
adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effective on April 15, 2004. No adverse comments were received, 
and thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule will become 
effective on that date.

    Issued in Kansas City, MO, on January 23, 2004.
Paul J. Sheridan,
Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Central Region.
[FR Doc. 04-2515 Filed 2-4-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Superior Oil & Gas Co. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, B.J. Sparks, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:
              November 14, 2008
            
            /s/ *B.J.
              Sparks*B.J.
              SparksChief
              Executive Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Superior Oil & Gas Co. and will be retained by Superior Oil & Gas Co.
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.


Exhibit
        32.1
 Page
        1 of
        1 Page
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

** **

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Brand Energy & InfrastructureServices, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘Report”),I, Anthony A. Rabb, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| Date: May 12, 2006 |                                         |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|               | /s/    Anthony A. Rabb             |   |
|               | Anthony A. Rabb                              |
|               | Chief Financial Officer and Vice  President, |
|               | Finance                                      |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

 

----
Third Amended Employment Agreement dated January 16, 2003 by and between Crown



 Exhibit 10.3 
  
 THIRD AMENDMENT 
  
 THIS THIRD AMENDMENT is made by and between John P. Leighton (“Employee”) and Crown Financial Group, Inc., f/k/a M.H. Meyerson & Co., Inc.,
a New Jersey corporation having an address at 525 Washington Boulevard, Jersey City, New Jersey 07310 (the “Employer”). 
  
 Employee and the Employer have entered into an amended and restated employment contract dated as of September 2, 2003 as amended December 8, 2003 (as
amended, the “Contract”). 
  
 In return for the
Employer’s agreement to waive its right to terminate without cause the Employee during the thirty (30) day period following execution of this Amendment by the parties hereto: 
  
 Employee hereby agrees to reduce his annual compensation commencing January 1, 2004 to four hundred thousand dollars
($400,000). 
  
 Further, Employee hereby agrees that the reduction
in annual compensation shall not constitute “good reason” under Section 5.e. of the Contract. 
  
 Except as expressly amended herein, the terms and conditions of the Contract shall remain in full force and effect. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be
executed by their respective officers thereto duly authorized effective January 16, 2004. 
  

							
	 EMPLOYER
	  	 EMPLOYEE

				
	 By:
	 	 /s/    Jeffrey M. Hoobler

	  	 By:
	 	 /s/    John P. Leighton


	 Name:
	 	 Jeffrey M. Hoobler
	  	 Name:
	 	 John P. Leighton

	 Title:
	 	 EVP & Chief Operating Officer
### **CHAPTER 34—ARMED FORCES AND FREE POSTAGE**

Sec.
3401.
Mailing privileges of members of Armed Forces of the United States.
[3402.
Repealed.]
3403.
Matter for blind and other handicapped persons.
3404.
Unsealed letters sent by blind or physically handicapped persons.
3405.
Markings.
3406.
Balloting materials under the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2019**—Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title X, §1055(c)(2), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1593, added item 3401 and struck out former item 3401 "Mailing privileges of members of Armed Forces of the United States and of friendly foreign nations".

**1986**—Pub. L. 99–410, title II, §201(b)(1), Aug. 28, 1986, 100 Stat. 928, added item 3406.

**1979**—Pub. L. 96–70, title I, §1331(e)(3)(B), Sept. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 482, struck out item 3402 "Mailing privileges of members of Armed Forces of the United States and of friendly foreign nations in the Canal Zone".
§ 470.101 Statutory authority. ( a ) Section 4702, title 5, United States Code, provides the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) with the authority to: ( 1 ) Establish and maintain, and assist in the establishment and maintenance of, research programs to study improved methods and technologies in Federal personnel management;
( 2 ) Evaluate the research programs established under paragraph (a)(1) of this section;
( 3 ) Establish and maintain a program for the collection and public dissemination of information relating to personnel management research, and for encouraging and facilitating the exchange of information among interested persons and entities; and
( 4 ) Carry out the preceding functions directly or through agreement or contract.
( b ) Section 4703, title 5, United States Code, provides OPM with the authority to conduct and evaluate demonstration projects to determine whether a specified change in personnel management policies or procedures would result in improved Federal personnel management.
( c ) This part supplements and implements the provisions of chapter 47 of title 5, United States Code, relating to the conduct of personnel research programs and demonstration projects, and must be read together with those provisions of law.
#### In the Matter of Keyes Winter, as President Justice of the Municipal Court of the City of New York, on Behalf of the Board of Justices of the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Petitioner, against Harry Wolkof, as Clerk of the Second District Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, Respondent.

Settle order on notice. Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur.
Appendix 20 

RS-50 PRODUCT STEWARDSHIP 

FOR THE US MARKET

REFRIGERANT SOLUTIONS LIMITED WILL ONLY SUPPLY DIRECTLY TO 

THE MARKET, OR THROUGH DISTRIBUTORS WHO ARE US EPA 

CERTIFIED REFRIGERANT RECLAIMERS OPERATING REFRIGERANT 

RECYCLING SERVICES. WHILST RS-50 CONTAINS ONLY HFCs AND 

HYDROCARBON, AND DOES NOT CONTAIN CLASS 1 OR CLASS II 

MATERIALS, REFRIGERANT SOLUTIONS LIMITED AND ITS 

DISTRIBUTORS WILL PROMOTE AND OPERATE ITS RECLAMATION 

SERVICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CLEAN AIR ACT 1990 

AMENDMENTS AND IN PARTICULAR IN THE SPIRIT OF THE 

REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 608 OF THE ACT.
B.C.D. 15-21

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Washington Transportation Group, LLC (WTG)

August 18, 2015

This is a determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning the

continuing status of Washington Transportation Group, LLC (WTG) (BA

No. 9630) as an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act (RRA) (45

U.S.C. §231 et seq.) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (RUIA)

(45 U.S.C. §35 1 et seep).

In B.C.D. 99-34, WTG was determined to be an employer under the

Railroad Retirement Act and Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act

effective January 1, 1999, the date it commenced operations. The Board’s

decision found that WTG was under common control with Montana Rail

Link (MRL) (BA No. 3658) and I&M Rail Link (IMRL) (BA No. 5623),

covered rail carriers, within the definition of an affiliate employer under

Section l(a)(l)(ii) of the RRA (45 U.S.C. § 23l(a)(l)(ii)) and the 

corresponding provision ofthe RUIA.

In a letter dated May 18, 2015, Ms. Patty Seabaugh, payroll Manager for 

MRL, informed the Board that WTG consisted of one employee and that

employee retired on May 31, 2013. Accordingly, Ms. Seabaugh stated that

MRL had no wages to report due to the last employee’s retirement.

Additionally, in a letter dated June 10, 2015, Mr. Lawrence R. Simkins,

President of WTG, stated that “WTG no longer engages in services or

business activity involving the rail industry. Futhermore, as ofJune 1, 2013, 

WTG no longer employed any railroad-related employees.”

Section 202.11 (20 CFR 202.11) ofthe Board’s regulations states that:

The employer status of any company or person shall terminate

whenever such company or person loses any of the characteristics

essential to the existence of an employer status.

The evidence of record establishes that WTG no longer possesses the 

characteristics of an operating railroad company. The Board therefore finds 

that effective May 31, 2013, the date its last employee retired, Washington

BA # 9630
Transportation Group, LLC, ceased being a covered employer under the

Railroad Retirement and Railroad Unemployment Insurance Acts.

FOR THE BOARD

Martha P. Rico

Secretary to the Board
### **CHAPTER 1515—NATIONAL FEDERATION OF MUSIC CLUBS**

Sec.
151501.
Definition.
151502.
Organization.
151503.
Purposes.
151504.
Membership.
151505.
Governing body.
151506.
Powers.
151507.
Restrictions.
151508.
Duty to maintain corporate and tax-exempt status.
151509.
Records and inspection.
151510.
Service of process.
151511.
Liability for acts of officers and agents.
151512.
Annual report.
FORWARDINGFREIGHT TO RUSSIA

----
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 222 (Thursday, November 18, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 67581]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25531]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than December 2, 2004.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. Bancshares of Camden, Inc., Camden, Tennessee; to engage de novo 
through its subsidiary, BOC Reinsurance Company, Ltd., Crossville, 
Tennessee, in reinsuring credit life, accident and health insurance, 
pursuant to section 225.28(b)(11)(i) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 12, 
2004.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 04-25531 Filed 11-17-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S