alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region III

2443 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. III-11-024

Contact: Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil (630) 829-9663

June 30, 2011

E-Mail: OPA3.RegionIII@nrc.gov 

NRC NAMES NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR AT

DUANE ARNOLD ENERGY CENTER

The U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has selected Lucas 

Haeg as the new senior resident inspector at the Duane Arnold Energy 

Center, located at Palo, Iowa.

The nuclear power facility is operated by NextEra Energy Duane 

Arnold, LLC.

Each commercial nuclear power plant site in the United States 

has at least two resident inspectors who monitor day-to-day operations at 

the plant. Haeg joins NRC resident inspector Robert Murray at the 

Duane Arnold facility.

“Lucas Haeg brings a commitment of safety and years of regulatory experience to the job 

of helping to protect public health and safety at the Duane Arnold plant,” said Mark Satorius, 

NRC Region III regional administrator. 

Haeg joined the NRC in June 2003 and most recently was the resident inspector at the 

Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant in Minnesota. He began his NRC career as a reactor 

engineer after earning a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from Minnesota State 

University, Mankato, Minn.

He graduated from the NRC’s Nuclear Safety Professional Development Program, a twoyear program that provides specialized training in nuclear safety, inspection procedures, and a 

broad perspective of NRC regulatory activities. He also completed the agency’s inspector 

qualification program.
The Duane Arnold resident inspectors can be reached at (319) 851-5111.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

##### **PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350**

##### **AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofBancorp Rhode Island, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year endingDecember 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(a) the Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(b) the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated this 6th day of March, 2006.

 

 

 
| /s/ Linda H. Simmons                   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Linda  H. Simmons                      |   |   |
| Chief  Financial Officer and Treasurer |   |   |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Bancorp RhodeIsland, Inc. and will be retained by Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc. and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

**DEEP DOWN, INC.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report onForm 10-K of Deep Down, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Ronald E. Smith, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1) 	The Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) 	The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Ronald E. Smith                         

Ronald E. Smith

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

March 31, 2015
#### Leonard E. Hammond et al., Appellants, v. Town of Caldwell, Respondent.

— Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Warren County. Plaintiffs are the owners of unimproved land in the town of Caldwell having a fifty-foot frontage on a street. A town zoning ordinance enacted after plaintiffs’ acquisition of title prohibits the erection of any structure in this area having a frontage of less than seventy-five feet. In an action for declaratory judgment the complaint alleges the ordinance is unconstitutional as to this land acquired before its enactment since it prohibits any use of it. The court at Special Term has dismissed the complaint. The town on appeal concedes that plaintiffs should be permitted to construct a dwelling on their premises but argues their remedy is to apply to the board to grant a variance. On the motion addressed to the complaint its factual averments must be accepted and affidavits cannot be read. The complaint on its face alleges interference with plaintiffs’ rights on constitutional grounds. It states on its face a cause of action for declaratory judgment. It may well be that when the record is fully developed it will be seen that the plaintiffs have other remedies to protect their rights by application to the board and direct review of its determination; that the constitutional question will not be decisive, and that the declaratory judgment will be unnecessary. All this will depend on the pleading of the defendant and on the course of the trial. On its face we think the complaint is good. Order reversed, on the law and facts, and motion denied, with $10 costs and disbursements. Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Imrie, JJ., concur.
----

| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of and for the period covered by thereport. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  |  May 9, 2008 |   | By:   | /s/ Thomas M. Whelan                         |
|--------|-------------------|--------|-----------------|----------------------------------------------|
|   |              |   |            | Thomas      M. Whelan, Senior Vice President |
|   |              |   |            | and      Chief Financial Officer             |

----
## PART IV—MAIL MATTER

Chap.
Sec.
30.
Nonmailable Matter
3001
32.
Penalty and Franked Mail
3201
34.
Armed Forces and Free Postage
3401
36.
Postal Rates, Classes, and Services
3601
37.
Nonpostal services  1
3701

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2022**—Pub. L. 117–108, title I, §103(a)(2), Apr. 6, 2022, 136 Stat. 1144, added item for chapter 37.

1  So in original. Probably should be "Services".
1 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 95-10902

Summary Calendar

LOCKHEED CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORP.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Texas

(4:92-CV-865-Y)

April 4, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 1

Rockwell International Corporation (“Rockwell”) outbid

Lockheed Corporation (“Lockheed”) to perform a contract between the

United States and Korea. Lockheed sued Rockwell alleging that

Rockwell’s performance under the contract would constitute

infringement of Lockheed’s copyright. Rockwell filed a “Motion to

Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction” in which it argued that exclusive

subject matter jurisdiction lay in the court of claims, not the2

dis trict court. A great deal of time passed and ultimately the

Korean Government canceled the contract rendering the dispute moot.

Lockheed then filed a notice of dismissal of its lawsuit which the

district court subsequently confirmed by entering an order of

dismissal. Rockwell appeals raising numerous issues.

The threshol d question is whether Lockheed had the right to

unilaterally dismiss its suit under Rule 41. Clearly it did. Rule

41(a)(1)(i ) requires the filing of answer or motion for summary

judgment to preclude the plaintiff’s right of dismissal. E xxon v.

Maryland Casualty Co. , 599 F.2d 659 (5th Cir. 1979). No such

pleading was filed in this case. Rockwell argues that a footnote

in its brief filed in support of its motion to the effect that the

court might wish to consider the motion as one for summary judgment

and the fac t that, Lockheed in its brief agreed that the court

might do so, somehow transforms the Motion to Dismiss for Lack of

Jurisdiction into a motion for summary judgment. We find this

argument unavailing. What Rockwell filed it clearly labeled a

motion to dismiss. The content of its motion made it clear that it

was a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction under Rule

12(b)(1). Lockheed properly exercised its right to unilaterally

dismiss its case and we affirm that dismissal.

AFFIRMED.
#### § 875.304 How does the Carrier account for FLTCIP funds?

The Carrier must keep account of all funds received under this section separate from all other funds. The Carrier may use FLTCIP funds only for purposes specifically related to the FLTCIP.
RUSSIAN TAX CERTIFICATION

----

**April 1998**
by Kelly Raftery
U.S. companies with business with operations in Russia often receive requests from the RussianGovernment to complete a form  certifying that the company has paid U.S. tax on income fromsubsidiaries.  The U.S. company must send this form for certification to the Internal RevenueService at the following address:
Tony Skirkie
UNITED STATES 

 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 REGION I 

 475 ALLENDALE ROAD 

 KING OF PRUSSIA, PA 19406-1415 

November 16, 2009 

Aaron Gantt, Chief 

Bureau of Radiological Health 

Department of Health and Environmental Control 

2600 Bull Street 

Columbia, SC 29201 

Dear Mr. Gantt: 

A periodic meeting with your Office was held on August 4, 2009. The purpose of the meeting 

was to review and discuss the status of the South Carolina Department of Health and 

Environmental Control’s Agreement State program. The NRC was represented by Monica 

Orendi and me. 

I have completed and enclosed a general meeting summary, including any specific actions that 

will be taken as a result of the meeting. 

If you feel that our conclusions do not accurately summarize the meeting discussion, or have 

any additional remarks about the meeting in general, please contact me at (610) 337-5371, or 

email to Donna.Janda@nrc.gov to discuss your comments. 

Sincerely, 

/RA/ 

Donna M. Janda 

Regional State Agreements Officer 

Division of Nuclear Materials Safety 

Enclosure: As stated 

 
November 16, 2009 

Aaron Gantt, Chief 

Bureau of Radiological Health 

Department of Health and Environmental Control 

2600 Bull Street 

Columbia, SC 29201 

Dear Mr. Gantt: 

A periodic meeting with your Office was held on August 4, 2009. The purpose of the meeting 

was to review and discuss the status of the South Carolina Department of Health and 

Environmental Control’s Agreement State program. The NRC was represented by Monica 

Orendi and me. 

I have completed and enclosed a general meeting summary, including any specific actions that 

will be taken as a result of the meeting. 

If you feel that our conclusions do not accurately summarize the meeting discussion, or have 

any additional remarks about the meeting in general, please contact me at (610) 337-5371, or 

email to Donna.Janda@nrc.gov to discuss your comments. 

Sincerely, 

/RA/ 

Donna M. Janda 

Regional State Agreements Officer 

Division of Nuclear Materials Safety 

Enclosure: As stated 

Distribution: 

Aaron McCraw, FSME 

Monica Orendi, FSME 

John Kinneman, RI DNMS 

Daniel Collins, RI DNMS 

SUNSI Review Complete: DMJ (Reviewer=s Initials) 

DOCUMENT NAME: S:\State Agreement Files\South Carolina\8-4-2009 SC BRH Periodic Meeting Summary Cover Letter.doc 

After declaring this document AAn Official Agency Record@ it will be released to the Public. 

To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without attachment/enclosure "E" = Copy with 

attachment/enclosure "N" = No copy 

OFFICE DNMS/RI E DNMS/RI N 

NAME DJanda/DMJ JKottan/JJK 

DATE 11/13/09 11/13/09 

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY 

ML093170779
Board Coverage Decision

2010-42.10

Indianapolis Union Railway

Employer Coverage Terminated*

No Decision Published

BA # 4329
No. IV-10-009 

Contact: Victor Dricks Phone: (817) 860-8128 

 Lara Uselding Phone (817) 917-0321 

 

 March 22, 2010 

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

NRC SENDS SPECIAL INSPECTION TEAM TO FORT CALHOUN NUCLEAR PLANT 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has begun a special inspection at the Fort 

Calhoun nuclear plant to review the circumstances surrounding the failure of an auxiliary 

feedwater pump. The plant, operated by the Omaha Public Power District, is located about 20 

miles north of Omaha, Neb. 

 Inspectors, who began their work today, will identify the circumstances surrounding the 

pump’s failure during testing, review the licensee’s response to the event and its evaluation of the 

operability of the pump. The pump is used to supply water to the plant’s steam generators during 

some accident conditions. 

 The pump started properly on Feb.17, but shut down 20 seconds later. Operators 

subsequently made some adjustments to the pump and it functioned properly. However, it was 

decided that a special inspection was needed because this was the third failure during testing in 

the past 12 months of this piece of safety-related equipment. 

 “We want to thoroughly understand the failure and its significance because of the repeat 

nature of the problem and the importance of this piece of equipment in protecting plant safety,” 

said Region IV Administrator Elmo E. Collins. 

 The NRC inspectors will write an inspection report on their findings within 45 days of the 

end of the inspection that will be publicly available. 

### 

 

NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125 

Telephone: (817) 860-8128
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marco Community Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Richard Storm, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the Report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |     |  |                                            
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------
|Date: November 4, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Richard Storm, Jr.                     
|                       |  |     |  | Richard Storm, Jr., Chief Executive Officer
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-13-0465 SAT Date: 6/4/2013 Print Date: 9/30/2013
Related cases :

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 3

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 2 11

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: N o Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ;

P 2 Rec Comments : Comment: N o comment on most of the P2 claim; however, there is no reason to believe that this compound is less toxic than what it is replacing of the same material). Keywords : Keywords: UNCERT-LIVER, AQUATOX-A,C Summary of Assessment : Fate : Fate Summary: P-13-0465 FATE: Estimations for typical Liquid with MP < 25 °C (E) log Kow = 7.14 (E); S = 0.019 mg /L at 25 °C (E)VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 °C (E) BP > 400 °C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) log Koc = 7.08 (E) log Fish BCF = 2.98 (E) log Fish BAF = 0.59 (E) POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption and possible partial biodeg Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg ≥ mo Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong PBT Potential: P2B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl
Health : Health Summary: Absorption is poor all routes based on physical/chemical p roperties. There is uncertain concern for liver effects. Smaller molecules with the and benzotriazole moieties have been shown to cause liver effects. For example, caused liver effects at all dose levels (LOEL = 50 mg /kg) when tested in a 28-day oral study in rats Low moderate concern.
Ecotox : Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments
fish 96-h LC50 0.017 daphnid 48-h LC50 0.048 green algal 96-h EC50 0.14 fish

_ chronic value 0.002 benzotriazole SAR daphnid

_ chronic value 0.004 benzotriazole SAR algal

_ chronic value 0.032 Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for benzotriazoles, log Kow = 7.14 (EPI); liquid with S = 0.019 mg /L at 25 C (P); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;
Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern 1 benzotriazole SAR( p pb) SARs benzotriazoles,
SAR Class benzotriazole, Ecotox Category Benzotriazoles
Ecotox Factors Comments: SAT Chair: Becky Jones
EXHIBIT 31.1

      CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING
                 OFFICER OF IMAGE TECHNOLOGY LABORATORIES, INC.

I, Barry C. Muradian , certify that:

1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Image Technology
Laboratories, Inc.;

2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4) I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the
Registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this annual report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the Registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5) I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions);

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operations of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.






                               /S/ BARRY C. MURADIAN
                               -----------------
                               BARRY C. MURADIAN,
                               CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                               AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
                               APRIL 28, 2005
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-11-0028 - Options for Implementing an Alternative Interim Regulatory Approach to the Minimum Days Off Provisions of 10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I, "Managing Fatigue"

Accession Number: ML110390120

Date Released: Friday, March 4, 2011

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML110390077 - SECY-11-0028 - Options for Implementing an Alternative Interim Regulatory Approach to the Minimum Days Off Provisions of 10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I, "Managing Fatigue" (7 page(s), 2/28/2011)
    - ML110390095 - SECY-11-0028 - Enclosure: Policy Statement on Interim Enforcement Policy for the Minimum Days Off Requirements (9 page(s), 2/28/2011)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer