alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 890.1412 Non-pay status, insufficient pay, or change to ineligible position. ( a ) *Non-pay status for 365 days.* Enrollment of a tribal employee and coverage of family members may continue for up to 365 days during which the tribal employee is in a non-pay status (as described at § 890.303(e)(1)) under terms described at § 890.502(b). Enrollment terminates at midnight of the last day of the pay period which includes the 365th consecutive day of nonpay status or the last day of leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act, whichever is later. The tribal employee and covered family members are entitled to a 31-day temporary extension of coverage without premium contribution and may convert to an individual policy as described at § 890.401.
( b ) *Insufficient pay.* If the pay of a non-temporary tribal employee who is enrolled in FEHB is insufficient to pay for the tribal employee's share of premiums, the tribal employer must follow the procedure described at § 890.502(b). If the enrollment is terminated due to insufficient pay, the tribal employee and covered family members are entitled to a 31-day temporary extension of coverage without premium contribution and may convert to an individual policy as described at § 890.401.
( c ) *Insufficient pay for temporary tribal employees.* If the pay of a temporary tribal employee who meets eligibility requirements described at 5 U.S.C. 8906a is insufficient to pay the tribal employee's share of premiums as described at § 890.304(a)(2), and the tribal employee does not or cannot elect a plan at a cost to him or her not in excess of the pay, the tribal employee's enrollment must be terminated as described at § 890.304(a)(2). The tribal employee and covered family members are entitled to a 31-day temporary extension of coverage without premium contribution and may convert to an individual policy as described at § 890.401.
( d ) *Change to ineligible position.* A tribal employee who moves from an FEHB eligible to a non-FEHB-eligible position at a tribal employer will be eligible to continue FEHB enrollment as described in § 890.303(b).
( e ) Non-pay status due to Uniformed Service— ( 1 ) Enrollment of a tribal employee and coverage of family members terminates at midnight of the earliest of the dates described at § 890.304(a)(1)(vi) through (viii). The tribal employee and covered family members are entitled to a 31-day temporary extension of coverage without premium contribution and may convert to an individual policy as described at § 890.401.
( 2 ) Enrollment is reinstated on the date the tribal employee is restored to duty in an eligible position with the tribal employer upon return from Uniformed Service, pursuant to applicable law, provided that the tribal employer continues to purchase FEHB for its tribal employees in the affected tribal employee's billing unit on that date.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Clone Kinsey v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-20-00088-CR

Trial court case number: 1650087

Trial court: 228th District Court of Harris County

On April 10, 2021, Cynthia Henley, appointed counsel for appellant Clone Kinsey, filed a 

motion to withdraw as appellant’s counsel, stating that she has accepted new employment and can 

no longer represent appellant. On April 15, 2021, we abated this appeal, remanded the case to the 

trial court, and directed the trial court to determine whether Cynthia Henley should be allowed to 

withdraw from representing appellant and new counsel should be appointed to represent appellant 

on appeal. The trial court clerk has filed a supplemental record that contains a “Pauper’s Oath on 

Appeal,” in which the trial court appoints Jerome Godinich, Jr. as counsel for appellant. 

Accordingly, we grant the motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Cynthia Henley and 

reinstate the case on the Court’s active docket. 

The Clerk of this Court is directed to note on the docket of this Court both (1) Jerome 

Godinich, Jr.’s appearance as appointed counsel for appellant and (2) Cynthia Henley’s withdrawal 

as counsel for appellant. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s Amparo Guerra

Acting individually 

Date: May 25, 2021
### SUBCHAPTER IV—ARMY, NAVY, AIR FORCE, AND COAST GUARD MEDAL OF HONOR ROLL

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1963—Pub. L. 88–77, §5(3), July 25, 1963, 77 Stat. 96, substituted "ARMY, NAVY, AIR FORCE, AND COAST GUARD" for "ARMY, NAVY, AND AIR FORCE" in subchapter heading.
EXHIBIT 23


                        INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT




The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc.


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Form S-8, File Nos. 333-46438, 333-89148 and 333-107130, of Bancorp Rhode
Island, Inc. of our report dated February 27, 2004, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc. and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements
of operations, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, which report
appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K and to reference to our firm
under the heading "Selected Financial Data." Our report refers to the
adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") 142,
"Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" and SFAS 147, "Acquisitions of
Certain Financial Institutions."


/s/ KPMG LLP


Providence, Rhode Island
February 27, 2004


<PAGE>
#### § 231.117 Semiconductor manufacturing capacity.

*Semiconductor manufacturing capacity* means the productive capacity of a facility for semiconductor manufacturing. In the case of a wafer production facility, semiconductor manufacturing capacity is measured in wafers per year. In the case of a semiconductor fabrication facility, semiconductor manufacturing capacity is measured in wafer starts per year. In the case of a semiconductor fabrication facility for wafers designed for wafer-to-wafer bonding structure, semiconductor manufacturing capacity is measured in stacked wafers per year. In the case of a packaging facility, semiconductor manufacturing capacity is measured in packages per year.
#### McMullen Leavens Co., Incorporated, v. L. I. Van Buskirk Co. and Mill Factors Corporation.

Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 701.]
Editorial Note on Part 400
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 400 appear at 78 FR 69289, Nov. 19, 2013.

§ 400.24 Application for expansion or other modification to zone. ( a ) *In general.* ( 1 ) A grantee may apply to the Board for authority to expand or otherwise modify its zone (including pursuant to the ASF procedures adopted by the Board (§ 400.2(c))).
( 2 ) The Executive Secretary, in consultation with CBP as appropriate, shall determine whether the proposed modification involves a major change in the zone plan and is thus subject to paragraph (b) of this section, or is minor and subject to paragraph (c) of this section. In making this determination the Executive Secretary shall consider the extent to which the proposed modification would: ( i ) Substantially modify the plan originally approved by the Board; or
( ii ) Expand the physical dimensions of the approved zone area as they relate to the scope of operations envisioned in the original plan.
( b ) *Major modification to zone.* An application for a major modification of an approved zone shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements of § 400.21, except that the content submitted pursuant to § 400.21(d)(4) (economic justification) shall relate specifically to the proposed change.
( c ) *Minor modification to zone.* Other applications or requests under this subpart shall be submitted in letter form with information and documentation necessary for analysis, as determined by the Executive Secretary, who shall determine whether the proposed change is a minor one subject to this paragraph (c) instead of paragraph (b) of this section (*see* § 400.38). Such applications or requests include those for minor revisions of zone or subzone boundaries based on immediate need, as well as for designation as a subzone of all or part of an existing zone site(s) (or site(s) that qualifies for usage-driven status), where warranted by the circumstances and so long as the subzone remains subject to the activation limit (*see* § 400.2(b)) for the zone in question.
( d ) *Applications for other revisions to authority.* Applications or requests for other revisions to authority, such as for Board action to establish or modify an activation limit for a zone, modification of a restriction, reissuance of a grant of authority or request for a voluntary termination shall be submitted in letter form with information and documentation necessary for analysis, as determined by the Executive Secretary. If the change involves the removal or significant modification of a restriction included by the Board in its approval of authority or the reissuance of a grant of authority, the review procedures of §§ 400.31 through 400.34 and 400.36 shall be followed, where relevant. If not, the procedure set forth in § 400.38 shall generally apply (although the Executive Secretary may elect to follow the procedures of §§ 400.31 through 400.34 and 400.36 when warranted).
[77 FR 12139, Feb. 28, 2012, as amended at 89 FR 8528, Feb. 8, 2024]
### §414. Rights and protections under the Employee Polygraph Protection Act of 1988

(a) Polygraph Practices Prohibited.—No employing office may require a covered employee to take a lie detector test where such a test would be prohibited if required by an employer under paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of section 3 of the Employee Polygraph Protection Act of 1988. In addition, the waiver provisions of section 6(d) of such Act shall apply to covered employees.

(b) Remedy.—The remedy for a violation of subsection (a) shall be such damages as would be appropriate if awarded under section 6(c)(1) of the Employee Polygraph Protection Act of 1988.

(c) Regulations To Implement Section.—

(1) In general.—The President, or the designee of the President, shall issue regulations to implement this section.

(2) Agency regulations.—The regulations issued under paragraph (1) shall be the same as substantive regulations promulgated by the Secretary of Labor to implement the statutory provisions referred to in subsections (a) and (b) except to the extent that the President or designee may determine, for good cause shown and stated together with the regulation, that a modification of such regulations would be more effective for the implementation of the rights and protections under this section.

(d) Effective Date.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall take effect on the earlier of—

(1) the effective date of regulations issued under subsection (c); or

(2) October 1, 1998.

(Added Pub. L. 104–331, §2(a), Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4058.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Sections 3 and 6 of the Employee Polygraph Protection Act of 1988, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (b), are classified to sections 2002 and 2005, respectively, of Title 29, Labor.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Subsec. (c) of this section effective Oct. 26, 1996, see section 471(b) of this title.
§ 2006.8 Submission of written briefs. ( a ) In order to participate in the presentation of views either at a public hearing or otherwise, an interested person must submit a written brief before the close of the period of submission announced in the public notice. The brief may be, but need not be, supplemented by the presentation of oral testimony in any public hearing scheduled in accordance with § 2006.7.
( b ) The brief shall state clearly the position taken and shall describe with particularity the supporting rationale. It shall be submitted in 20 copies, which must be legibly typed, printed, or duplicated.
( c ) In order to assure each interested person an opportunity to contest the information provided by other parties, the Section 301 Committee will entertain rebuttal briefs filed by any interested person within a time limit specified in the public notice. Rebuttal briefs should be strictly limited to demonstrating errors of fact or analysis not pointed out in the briefs or hearing and should be as concise as possible.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                     (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act)

     I, J. Philip Hester, Sr., President and Chief Executive Officer of
Chestatee Bancshares, Inc. (the "Registrant"), do hereby certify in accordance
with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

     (i)  the annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Registrant, to which this
          certificate is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies
          with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
          Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a); and

     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Registrant.


Date:  March 29, 2007           BY:  /s/ J. Philip Hester, Sr.
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                     J. Philip Hester, Sr., C.E.O. and President



<PAGE>
RETAIL BANKING IN RUSSIA

----

**August 1997**
Sberbank, the only Russian bank where individual clients' deposits are protected by the RussianGovernment, holds more that 70 percent of non-corporate deposits in Russia.  Other strongRussian banks (such as Inkombank, Bank Rossiiski Kredit, Bank Stolichnych Sberezheniy,and Menatep) are challenging Sberbank's domination of the market, and are vying with oneanother to attract some of the billions of dollars worth of  "under the mattress" savings held byRussian citizens.  The standard services offered to individuals in both Moscow and regional banksare currency and ruble demand accounts, savings accounts, and certificates of deposit.  Although,according to Rossiiski Kredit Deputy Chairman Mr. Yuri Isayev, "the market demand for plasticcards is not high yet," Russian banks have began issuing classic and business VISA,Master/EuroCard, and bank debit cards to establish a position in the market for the future.  As arule, regional banks issue credit cards under the same conditions as their Moscow counterparts. Many banks  also offer "salary cards," an effective way for an employer to pay employees' salariesby direct bank deposit. 
Walk-in customers to regional branches can count on receiving a number of services, includingcash advances on major credit cards, inter-regional and international money transfers, and cashingof American Express and Thomas Cook traveler's checks.  Regional banks requiredocumentation from customers for all transactions according to rules set by the Central Bank ofRussia.  For more information on banking and finance in Russia, visit BISNIS Online atwww.iep.doc.gov/bisnis/country/9705bnks.htm.
***This report is provided courtesy of the Business Information Service for the NewlyIndependent States (BISNIS)***
### §5103. Restrictions on public use of United States Capitol Grounds

Public travel in, and occupancy of, the United States Capitol Grounds is restricted to the roads, walks, and places prepared for that purpose.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1176.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 5103 | 40:193b. | July 31, 1946, ch. 707, §2, 60 Stat. 718. |

Section

The words "by flagging, paving, or otherwise" are omitted as unnecessary.
§ 744.19 Licensing policy regarding persons sanctioned pursuant to specified statutes. Notwithstanding any other licensing policy elsewhere in the EAR, BIS will deny any export or reexport license application if any person who is a party to the transaction (*i.e.,* the applicant, other party authorized to receive a license, purchaser, intermediate consignee, ultimate consignee, or end-user) is subject to one or more of the sanctions described in paragraphs (a), (b), (c), and (e) of this section and will deny any export or reexport license application for an item listed on the Commerce Control List with a reason for control of MT if a person who is a party to the transaction is subject to a sanction described in paragraph (d) of this section. ( a ) A sanction issued pursuant to the Iran-Iraq Arms Nonproliferation Act of 1992 (50 U.S.C. 1701 note) that prohibits the issuance of any license to or by the sanctioned person.
( b ) A sanction issued pursuant to the Iran, North Korea, and Syria Nonproliferation Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 note) that prohibits the granting of a license and requires the suspension of an existing license for the transfer to foreign persons of items, the export of which is controlled under the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended (50 U.S.C. app. 2401-2420), or the Export Administration Regulations.
( c ) A sanction issued pursuant to section 11B(b)(1)(B)(ii) of the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended (50 U.S.C. app. 2401-2420), that prohibits the issuance of new licenses for exports to the sanctioned person of items controlled pursuant to the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended.
( d ) A sanction issued pursuant to section 11B(b)(1)(B)(i) of the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended (50 U.S.C. app. 2401-2420), that prohibits the issuance of new licenses for exports to the sanctioned person of MTCR Annex equipment or technology controlled pursuant to the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended.
( e ) A sanction issued pursuant to the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996 (50 U.S.C. 1701 note) that prohibits the issuance of a specific license or grant of any other specific permission or authority to export any goods or technology to a sanctioned person under the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended (50 U.S.C. app. 2401-2420).
[77 FR 5388, Feb. 3, 2012]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Biological Chemistry and Macromolecular Biophysics Integrated Review Group; Macromolecular Structure and Function D Study Section.                    

*Date:*                         February 13, 2019.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Residence Inn Bethesda, 7335 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         James W. Mack, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4154, MSC 7806, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-2037,                         *mackj2@csr.nih.gov.*

This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 25, 2019.

Sylvia L. Neal,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2019-00327 Filed 1-30-19; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 99.6

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Leitch Technology Corporation (the "Company") on Form 40-F for the period ended April 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Reginald J. Tiessen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|Date: September 15, 2003. |  | by: |  | /s/REGINALD J. TIESSENName: Reginald J. Tiessen
Title: Chief Financial Officer
|------------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Leitch Technology Corporation (the "Company") on Form 40-F for the period ended April 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stanley J. Kabala, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|Date: September 15, 2003. |  | by: |  | /s/STANLEY J. KABALAName: Stanley J. Kabala
Title: Chief Executive Officer
|------------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks