alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §5313A. Limitation on payment of clothing allowance to incarcerated veterans

In the case of a veteran who is incarcerated in a Federal, State, local, or other penal institution or correctional facility for a period in excess of 60 days and who is furnished clothing without charge by the institution, the amount of any annual clothing allowance payable to the veteran under section 1162 of this title shall be reduced by an amount equal to 1/365 of the amount of the allowance otherwise payable under that section for each day on which the veteran was so incarcerated during the 12-month period preceding the date on which payment of the allowance would be due. This section shall be carried out under regulations prescribed by the Secretary.

(Added Pub. L. 104–275, title V, §502(a), Oct. 9, 1996, 110 Stat. 3341; amended Pub. L. 109–461, title X, §1002(g), Dec. 22, 2006, 120 Stat. 3465.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–461 substituted "local, or other penal institution or correctional facility" for "or local penal institution".
### §14305. Liaison between Federal Government and Commission

(a) President.—The President shall provide effective and continuing liaison between the Federal Government and the Appalachian Regional Commission and a coordinated review within the Government of the plans and recommendations submitted by the Commission pursuant to sections 14303 and 14304 of this title.

(b) Interagency Coordinating Council on Appalachia.—In carrying out subsection (a), the President shall establish the Interagency Coordinating Council on Appalachia, to be composed of the Federal Cochairman and representatives of federal agencies that carry out economic development programs in the Appalachian region. The Federal Cochairman is the Chairperson of the Council.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1259.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 14305(a) | 40 App.:104(a). | Pub. L. 89–4, title I, §104(a), Mar. 9, 1965, 79 Stat. 8; Pub. L. 107–149, §4(1), Mar. 12, 2002, 116 Stat. 67. |
| 14305(b) | 40 App.:104(b) | Pub. L. 89–4, title I, §104(b), as added Pub. L. 107–149, §4(2), Mar. 12, 2002, 116 Stat. 67. |

Section
#### § 890.1401 Purpose.

This subpart sets forth the conditions for coverage, rights, and benefits under Chapter 89 of title 5, United States Code, according to the provisions of 25 U.S.C. 1647b.
NRC REQUESTS PUBLIC COMMENT ON PROPOSED CHANGES 

TO DEFINITION OF CONSTRUCTION FOR MATERIALS APPLICANTS 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is seeking public comment on proposed changes to 

its regulations for nuclear materials licenses that would change the meaning of “construction” 

and “commencement of construction” and allow applicants for some materials licenses to 

conduct certain site-preparation activities before a license is issued. 

 The proposed changes would apply to the licensing and approval processes for 

byproduct, source and special nuclear material licenses and irradiators. They would make the 

definition of construction and commencement of construction consistent with NRC regulations 

for nuclear power plant applicants and licensees as amended in 2007. Currently, applicants for 

uranium recovery, fuel cycle facilities and other materials facilities must apply for exemptions to 

conduct site preparation activities similar to those that power plant applicants are allowed to 

perform. 

 The proposed rule would allow applicants to perform site preparation activities that do 

not implicate radiological health and safety or common defense and security considerations. 

Such activities include exploration; site clearing; grading; installation of drainage, erosion and 

other environmental mitigation measures; and construction of temporary roads and support 

buildings. 

 The proposed rule does not include a “limited work authorization” provision similar to 

that in NRC regulations for nuclear power plants, because recent exemption requests by 

materials applicants would be satisfied by the revised definition of construction. However, the 

agency welcomes public comment on whether the final rule should include such a provision. 

 The proposed rule was published July 27 in the Federal Register, and is available online 

at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-18344.pdf. Comments will be accepted through 

Sept. 27, and may be submitted over the federal rulemaking website, http://www.regulations.gov

by using Docket ID NRC-2010-0075. They may also be mailed to Secretary, U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., 20555-0001, ATTN: Rulemakings and 

Adjudications Staff, or emailed to Rulemaking.Comments@nrc.gov. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-135 August 5, 2010
### §522. Existing provisions of law

The first sentence of section 494 of this title, and section 502 of this title, shall be inapplicable with respect to any bridge to which the provisions of this subchapter are applicable.

(June 21, 1940, ch. 409, §12, 54 Stat. 501; Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXV [LXXXV], §8507(b), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4754; Pub. L. 117–263, div. K, title CXVIII, §11805(a), (c), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 4164, 4165.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–263, §11805(c), struck out ", except to the extent provided in this section" before period at end.

Pub. L. 117–263, §11805(a), reinstated section 12(a) of the act of June 21, 1940, as it appeared before repeal by Pub. L. 116–283, and redesignated it as the sole text of section 12.

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 repealed this section. Text of subsec. (a) was reinstated by Pub. L. 117–263 and redesignated as text of entire section. See above.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2022 Amendment

Pub. L. 117–263, div. K, title CXVIII, §11805(b), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 4165, provided that: "The provision reinstated under subsection (a) [this section] shall be treated as if such section 8507(b) [of Pub. L. 116–283, which had repealed this section] had never taken effect."
#### MAXWELL HARDWARE COMPANY, Respondent, v. HOFFMAN, Appellant.

(170 N. W. 135).

(File No. 4440.

Opinion filed Dec. 31, 1918).

(1). Trover — Conversion—Defense of Lien For Storage Dues, Subsequent Disposal of Property, Effect, Re Lien — Demand, Ne- ° cessity — Statute.

*213In a suit for damages for conversion of personalty, the defense being a claim of lien thereon for storage charges; it appearing that prior to plaintiff’s demand for the property, defendant had disposed thereof and parted with its possession, held, that since, if defendant had a lien thereon at time of such disposal, it was thereby extinguished (Civ. Code, Sec. 2038); therefore plaintiff need not have tendered or paid storage charges as part of his demand for possession.

(2). Appeals — Error—No Finding' — Sufficiency of Evidence, Defective Assignment of Error.

There being no finding of fact upon a proposition sought to be litigated on appeal involving evidence,, an assignment of error that evidence is insufficient “to sustain the finding” does not bring such matter up for review.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the ’City of Sioux Falls, S. D. Hon. Henry A. Miller, Judge, Pro Tern.

Action by 'Maxwell Hardware 'Company, against Jacob P. Hoffman, for damages for conversion of personalty. From a judgment for plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

*H. F. Fellozvs,*for Appellant.

*Morris & Fitzpatrick,*for Respondent.

GATE'S, J.

Action for damages for the conversion of a vacuum cleaner and motor. Trial to the court. Judgment for plaintiff. 'Defendant appeals from1 the judgment and from the denial of a new trial.

[1] Appellant’s argument rests chiefly upon the contention that, inasmuch! as he had a lien upon the property for storage charges, the respondent never made a valid) demand for the property, since he did not pay or tender the storage charges, and therefore that appellant was not without justification in failing to deliver it. Prior to such demand, appellant had disposed of the property to a junk dealer and did not have it in his possession at the time of the demand. If he had a lien thereon at the time of its disposal, such lien was thereby extinguished. 'C. C. § 2038. Therefore respondent was under no legal obligation to tender or pay the storage charges as a part of his demand for possession.

[2] But appellant contends that the evidence tends to show that 'by agreement with respondent he had afterwards, and before the beginning of this action, repurchased the property and held it for, and was willing to deliver it to, respondent upon payment of *214his charges. No finding, of fact upon this proposition was made or sought. An assignment of error to the effect that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the findings does not 'bring this matter ■before us for review.

The judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# November 2009 Report on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206.

Accession Number: ML093420720

Date Released: Thursday, December 31, 2009

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML093350163 - Cover Memo:  November 2009 Report on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206. (3 page(s), 12/22/2009)
    - ML093410495 - November 2009 Report on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206. (10 page(s), 12/22/2009)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
Fourth Department,

November, 1943.

(November 5, 1943.)

#### Seth Baker, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Charles Baker, Deceased, Respondent, v. Onalee Sprague et al., Appellants.

Present—Crosby, P.- J., Cunningham, Taylor, Harris and McCurn, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marco Community Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Thomas M. Whelan, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |     |  |                                        
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Date: November 4, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Thomas M. Whelan                   
|                       |  |     |  | Thomas M. Whelan, Senior Vice President
|                       |  |     |  | and Chief Financial Officer
EBRD SUPPORTS TRADE FINANCE

----
# L_2022279EN.01001301.xml

| 27.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 279/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 279/13

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 115/2019

of 8 May 2019

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2022/2013]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1967 of 12 December 2018 amending Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 to classify the substance paromomycin as regards its maximum residue limit (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1967 of 12 December 2018 amending Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 to classify the substance paromomycin as regards its maximum residue limit (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 13 (Commission Regulation (EU) No 37/2010) of Chapter XIII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32018 R 1967: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1967 of 12 December 2018 (OJ L 316, 13.12.2018, p. 6).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32018 R 1967: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1967 of 12 December 2018 (OJ L 316, 13.12.2018, p. 6).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1967 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 June 2019, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 May 2019.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 316, 13.12.2018, p. 6.

1

(*)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*

---
#### Henry Parisod et al., Appellants, v. City of New York, Respondent.

*841Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.
# L_2022291EN.01007001.xml

| 10.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 291/70 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 291/70

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 179/2019

of 14 June 2019

amending Annex XXI (Statistics) to the EEA Agreement [2022/2171]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/505 of 19 December 2018 amending Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 184/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council, as regards the geographical breakdown levels (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/505 of 19 December 2018 amending Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 184/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council, as regards the geographical breakdown levels (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 19s (Regulation (EC) No 184/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32019 R 0505: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/505 of 19 December 2018 (OJ L 85, 27.3.2019, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32019 R 0505: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/505 of 19 December 2018 (OJ L 85, 27.3.2019, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/505 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 15 June 2019 provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 14 June 2019.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 85, 27.3.2019, p. 1.

1

(*)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*

---
First Amendment to Deferred Compensation Plan



 Exhibit 10.69 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT 
  
 LEVI STRAUSS & CO. DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR EXECUTIVES AND OUTSIDE DIRECTORS 
  
 WHEREAS, Levi Strauss & Co. (“LS&CO.”) maintains the
Levi Strauss & Co. Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives and Outside Directors (the “Plan”) to provide a deferred compensation program for a select group of management, highly compensated employees or directors. 
  
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 11.1 of the Plan, the LS&CO. is
authorized to amend the Plan at any time and for any reason; and 
  
 WHEREAS, LS&CO. desires to amend the definition of “Annual Bonus” to simplify references to reoccurring annual and long-term incentive plans sponsored by LS&CO.; and 
  
 WHEREAS, the amendment herein is within the delegated authority of
Fred D. Paulenich; and 
  
 NOW THEREFORE, Effective January
1, 2003, Section 1.2 of the Plan is hereby amended, in the following manner: 
  

	 	“(a)	Payments under a reoccurring annual or long-term incentive plan; 

  

	 	(b)	Any sign-on bonus payable at a specified future date following an Employee’s commencement of employment; 

  

	 	(c)	Any retention bonus payable to an Employee; or 

  

	 	(d)	Any non-recurring special bonus that the Committee designates, in writing, as eligible for deferral under this Plan.” 

  
 * * * 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Amendment to be executed this 17th day of November, 2003.

  

			
	LEVI STRAUSS & CO.
		
	By:	 	/s/    FRED D. PAULENICH
	 	 	

	 	 	 Fred D. Paulenich
 Senior Vice President of Worldwide Human Resources
#### In the Matter of a Plan of Readjustment of All Holders of Investments in a Mortgage Covering Premises No. 50-05 43rd Avenue, Woodside, Borough of Queens, Guaranteed by Bond and Mortgage Guarantee Company. (Guarantee No. 181,615.) (Plan No. 6023.) William T. Harris, as Trustee under a Declaration of Trust Dated March 16, 1939, Appellant; Mary Menaker et al., Certificate Holders, et al., Respondents.

Appeal by the trustee of a certificated mortgage from an order denying his application for $3,500 as counsel fee and $350 as expenses, and granting the application to the extent of $1,000. Order modified on the facts by increasing the sum allowed for counsel fee and expenses from $1,000 to $1,500. As thus modified, the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellant. No opinion. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
### §506. Duration of regulations and licenses and publication of regulations

Regulations prescribed and licenses authorized under this chapter are effective only during the inaugural period. The regulations shall be published in at least one daily newspaper published in the District of Columbia. A penalty prescribed for violating such a regulation may not be enforced until 5 days after publication.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1265.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 506 | 36:728 (1st, 2d sentences). | Aug. 6, 1956, ch. 974, §8 (1st, 2d sentences), 70 Stat. 1051. |

Section

The words "full force and" are omitted as unnecessary.
### §6627. Compensation for lost or damaged property

#### (a) In general

Any amounts received by the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate (in this section referred to as the "Sergeant at Arms") for compensation for damage to, loss of, or loss of use of property of the Sergeant at Arms that was procured using amounts available to the Sergeant at Arms in the account for Contingent Expenses, Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate, shall be credited to that account or, if applicable, to any subaccount of that account.

#### (b) Availability

Amounts credited to any account or subaccount under subsection (a) shall be merged with amounts in that account or subaccount and shall be available to the same extent, and subject to the same terms and conditions, as amounts in that account or subaccount.

#### (c) Effective date

This section shall apply with respect to fiscal year 2005 and each fiscal year thereafter.

(Pub. L. 108–447, div. G, title I, §8, Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 3170.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 117d–1 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is from the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2005, which is div. G of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005.
§ 839.902 Will my CSRS retirement deductions be used to pay the Social Security taxes for the period of the qualifying retirement coverage error if I was erroneously placed in CSRS and did not pay Social Security taxes? ( a ) If your qualifying retirement coverage error was not previously corrected, the amount erroneously withheld for CSRS retirement deductions will be: ( 1 ) Used to pay your new retirement deduction amount; and
( 2 ) Applied toward any Social Security taxes you owe for the time you were in the wrong retirement plan.
( b ) You will get Social Security credit for all the time you were erroneously covered by CSRS. Your employer will send the Social Security Administration a record of your earnings for all the years you should have had Social Security coverage.
NRC MOVING REGION I OFFICE TO NEW KING OF PRUSSIA, PA., LOCATION

Effective Monday, May 14, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I staff will 

be housed in new offices in King of Prussia (Montgomery County), Pa. The mailing address will 

change, but current telephone numbers for the regional staff will remain unchanged.

The new address is 2100 Renaissance Blvd., Suite 100, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406-2713.

During the move process leading up to May 14, Region I office telephone service will be 

limited. However, the office’s main telephone number, 610-337-5000, and its free hotline 

number, 1-800-695-7403, ext. 5222, will remain operational.

 ###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES link on the 

NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's 

website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region I 

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov 

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. I-12-022

Contact: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330

 Neil Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

May 4, 2012

Email: opa1.resource@nrc.gov
§ 919.420 May I approve a transaction with an excluded or disqualified person at a lower tier? If a transaction at a lower tier is subject to your approval, you as an agency official may not approve— ( a ) A covered transaction with a person who is currently excluded, unless you obtain an exception under § 919.120; or
( b ) A transaction with a person who is disqualified from that transaction, unless you obtain a waiver or exception under the statute, Executive order, or regulation that is the basis for the person's disqualification.