alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w21



 





Exhibit 10.21








2004 – 2005 STRATEGIC INCENTIVE PLAN (SIP)



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Purpose	 	Reward achievement of two year goals.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Eligibility	 	Key managers and above identified on an individual basis.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Participation Level	 	Individual awards are based on salary paid in final year of two-year performance period.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Target Incentives	 	Sum of target incentive opportunity as a percent of salary times salary for all
eligible participants.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Performance Measures	 	Funding to be based on performance versus the following measures:
	

	 	Ø
	 	60% overall Corporate Brunswick Value Added (BVA). BVA defined as profits after-tax;
reduced for cost of capital charge (capital to include working, fixed and other assets;
cost of capital will include debt and equity).	 	 
	

	 	Ø
	 	40% performance against Strategic Factors:	 	 








	 	•	 	For Division employees based on Division’s strategic factor performance
	 
	 	•	 	For headquarters employees based on average of all Division results
	 
	 	•	 	Factors include:






	 	•	 	Customer satisfaction
	 	•	 	Growth in market share
	 	•	 	Product innovation (percent of sales from new products)
	 	•	 	Employee satisfaction





	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Performance Levels:
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Ø Threshold

	 	Ø
	 	Minimum performance level supporting the funding of any variable incentive pay.	 	 
	Ø Target

	 	Ø
	 	Agreed upon performance level, typically tied to business plans for performance period.	 	 
	Ø Stretch

	 	Ø
	 	Performance necessary to support funding at twice target level.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Performance Period	 	Two-year overlapping performance periods will be used.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Overall Funding	 	Overall funding will be the sum of BVA funding and strategic factor funding.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Funding Review and
Approval	 	The following steps will be taken to review and approve funding:
	

	 	Ø
	 	CFO will review actual results quarterly to evaluate established accruals.	 	 
	

	 	Ø
	 	CEO will review performance at end of performance period and approve funding or
recommend funding to Human Resource and Compensation Committee.	 	 
	

	 	Ø
	 	Committee will review and approve funding.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Maximum Funding	 	None
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Individual Awards	 	Individual awards will be determined on a discretionary basis using evaluation of
individual performance for the performance period, target incentives as a percent of
salary and covered salary (actual received for final year of performance period).
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Individuals must be employed through end of performance period to receive an award,
except those terminating due to death or permanent and total disability will be
eligible to receive awards.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Timing of Award
Payments	 	As soon as practical after financial results are confirmed and appropriate approvals
obtained.






Nothing contained in these materials constitutes or is intended to create a
promise of an individual incentive award or a contract of continued employment.
Employment is at-will and may be terminated by either the employee or
Corporation for any reason at any time.
§ 280.102 Affirmations. ( a ) ( 1 ) An accreditation body accrediting third parties who certify manufacturing systems as fastener quality assurance systems as described in section 3(7)(B)(iii)(I) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 5402(7)(B)(iii)(I)) shall affirm to the Director, NIST, that it meets the requirements of ISO/IEC Guide 61 (or another document approved by the Director, NIST, under section 10(b) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 5411a(b)) and § 280.101(a) of this part), including revisions from time to time.
( 2 ) An accreditation body accrediting laboratories as described in section 3(1)(B) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 5402(1)(B)) shall affirm to the Director, NIST, that it meets the requirements of ISO/IEC Guide 58 (or another document approved by the Director, NIST, under section 10(d) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 5411a(d)) and § 280.101(d) of this part), including revisions from time to time.
( b ) An affirmation required under paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this section shall take the form of a self-declaration that the accreditation body meets the requirements of the applicable Guide, signed by an authorized representative of the accreditation body. No supporting documentation is required.
( c ) Affirmations should be submitted to: FQA Document Certifications, NIST, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20899.
( d ) Any affirmation submitted in accordance with this section shall be considered to be a continuous affirmation that the accreditation body meets the requirements of the applicable Guide, unless and until the affirmation is withdrawn by the accreditation body.
§ 742.11 Specially designed implements of torture, including thumbscrews, thumbcuffs, fingercuffs, spiked batons, and parts and accessories, n.e.s. ( a ) *License Requirements.* In support of U.S. foreign policy to promote the observance of human rights throughout the world, a license is required to export any commodity controlled by ECCN 0A983 to all destinations including Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom.
( b ) *Licensing policy.* Applications for such licenses will generally be denied to all destinations.
( c ) *Contract sanctity.* The contract sanctity date is November 9, 1995. Contract sanctity will be a factor in considering only applications for export to the NATO countries, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand.
( d ) *U.S. controls.* In maintaining its controls on specially designed instruments of torture the United States considers international norms regarding human rights and the practices of other countries that control exports to promote the observance of human rights. However, these controls are not based on the decisions of any multinational export control regime and may differ from controls imposed by other countries.
[61 FR 12786, Mar. 25, 1996, as amended at 72 FR 9849, Mar. 6, 2007; 75 FR 41082, July 15, 2010; 89 FR 28600, Apr. 19, 2024]
Safety and Security Cultur

An International Perspective

Martin VirgilioDeputy Executive Director for Materials, Waste,

Research, State, Tribal, and Compliance Programs

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionFebruary 3, 2009
IAEA Nuclear Security Cultur

 Implementing Guide (Nuclear Security Serie

2008)

 Purpose – to serve as an introduction to 

i l f l li

secur

ity cu

lture 

for regu

lators, licensee

managers, individual workers and the p

 Defines roles and responsibilities  Describes characteristics of security cu

including observable attributes
Consideration of Safety-Security 

Interface Risk and Consequences

 Safety – Inadvertent actions Security – Deliberate/malicious acts Shared objective of limiting risk and 

consequences

 Information

 Safety – promotes sharing of information Security – restrict based on need-to-know
Treatment of Safety/Security Cult

 Separate policy statements, one for safe

culture and one for security culture

 Joint policy statement – A safety and s

culture policy statement where safety asecurity are treated equally
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - 32 CFR Part 270
          - [Docket ID: DOD-2018-OS-0050]
          - RIN 0790-AK38

# AGENCY:

Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, DoD.

# ACTION:

Final rule.

# SUMMARY:

This final rule removes the Department of Defense (DoD) regulation concerning compensation of certain former operatives incarcerated by the Democratic Republic of Vietnam. The content of this part is obsolete as the claim period expired and the Vietnam Commandos Compensation Commission was disbanded. Therefore, this part is unnecessary, and can be removed.

# DATES:

This rule is effective on January 31, 2019.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Don Syendsen, 703-695-9371.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This part was originally published 15 May 1997 under the National Defense Authorization Act of FY 1997 and established the Vietnam Commandos Compensation Commission within the Office of the Secretary of Defense. The rule authorized a claims process for compensation of Vietnamese operatives who served in certain U.S.-led operations, were captured, and incarcerated in the Democratic Republic of Vietnam. The claim period expired 15 May 2000; payments were completed by July 2001; and, the commission was disbanded.

This rule is not significant under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, “Regulatory Planning and Review,” therefore, the requirements of E.O. 13771, “Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs,” do not apply.

# List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 270

      - Claims
      - Military personnel
      - Prisoners of war
      - Vietnam

      ( print page 530)    

# PART 270—[REMOVED]

Accordingly, by the authority of 5 U.S.C. 301, 32 CFR part 270, is removed.

Dated: January 28, 2019.

Aaron T. Siegel,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. 

[FR Doc. 2019-00428 Filed 1-30-19; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Network Engines, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Douglas G. Bryant, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



Dated: December 14, 2009

/s/ DOUGLAS G. BRYANT Douglas G. Bryant Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 23.3


Consent of Independent Auditors





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:


(1)  Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-178639 and 333-172716) of Visteon Corporation; and


(2)  Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-169695) pertaining to the 2010 Incentive Plan of Visteon Corporation;


of our report dated June 24, 2014, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Yanfeng Visteon Automotive Trim Systems Company Limited, included in this amendment to the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) of Visteon Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2013.








/s/ Ernst & Young Hua Ming LLP





Shanghai, People's Republic of China


June 24, 2014
```

[House Report 107-337]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                    107-337

======================================================================

 
 WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY S. 
            1438, NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT OF 2002

                                _______
                                

  December 13 (legislative day, December 12), 2001.--Referred to the 
                House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

   Mrs. Myrick, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 316]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 316, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                summary of provisions of the resolution

    The resolution waives all points of order against the 
conference report to accompany S. 1438, the National Defense 
Authorization Act of 2002, and against its consideration. The 
resolution further provides that the conference report shall be 
considered as read.

                                  

```
<PAGE>

CINGULAR WIRELESS LLC

EXHIBITS - Compensation arrangement with Ralph de la Vega.

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.58

                                RALPH DE LA VEGA

                              COMPENSATION PACKAGE

POSITION:                     Chief Operating Officer

EFFECTIVE DATE:               December 31, 2003


SALARY:                       $500,000


2004 EXECUTIVE SHORT-TERM
INCENTIVE AWARD TARGET:       $500,000


2004 LONG-TERM TARGET:        $2,250,000
                              Grants will be based on plan design as approved by
                              the Cingular Board of Directors.
                              Grant date:  April 1, 2004

                              A component of the annual long term grant will be
                              non-performance full value shares (e.g. restricted
                              stock or equivalent) at least equal to the
                              BellSouth Band A officers percentage

RETENTION GRANT:              $2,500,000 of restricted stock units (value mix of
                              60% SBC/40% BLS).
                              Dividend equivalents paid quarterly.
                              3-year cliff vesting.
                              Number of shares will be determined by the closing
                              stock prices on December 31, 2003.

PTO DAYS:                     38 days
§ 890.1414 Responsibilities of the tribal employer. ( a ) The tribal employer pays premiums for tribal employees enrolled under this subpart pursuant to §§ 890.1403 and 890.1413.
( b ) The tribal employer must determine the eligibility of individuals who attempt to enroll for coverage under this subpart and enroll those it finds eligible.
( c ) The tribal employer must determine whether eligible tribal employees have eligible family member(s) and allow coverage under a self plus one or self and family enrollment as described in § 890.302 for those it finds eligible.
( d ) The tribal employer must establish or identify an independent dispute resolution panel for reconsideration of enrollment and eligibility decisions as described in § 890.1415.
( e ) The tribal employer has the following notification responsibilities. The tribal employer must— ( 1 ) Notify OPM and tribal employees in writing of intent to revoke election to purchase FEHB at least 60 days before such revocation described at § 890.1404(d);
( 2 ) Promptly notify tribal employees and OPM if there is a change in the tribal employer's entitlement to purchase FEHB described at § 890.1410(d);
( 3 ) Promptly notify affected tribal employees of termination of enrollment due to non-payment, the 31-day temporary extension of coverage and its ending date described at § 890.1410(f)(2) through (3); and
( 4 ) Promptly notify affected tribal employees of termination of enrollment due to non-payment described at § 890.1410(f)(4).
NRC REACHES SETTLEMENT WITH CHEVRON ENVIRONMENTAL 

MANAGEMENT COMPANY IN DISCRIMINATION CASE 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has reached a settlement with Chevron 

Environmental Management Co. (CEMC) over the apparent termination of a contract radiation 

safety employee who raised safety concerns during the decommissioning of the former Molycorp 

Inc. facility in Washington, Pa. 

 A Confirmatory Order, issued July 8, outlines the agreement, which was reached through 

the NRC’s alternative dispute resolution process. CEMC has agreed to implement a number of 

actions at the site, including training supervisors about employees’ rights to raise safety 

concerns; communicating the company’s policy and management expectations about employees’ 

rights to raise concerns; and surveying employees about their willingness to raise safety 

concerns. 

 The NRC’s Office of Investigations determined that the individual was fired after raising 

nuclear safety concerns regarding the transportation of potentially contaminated soil samples 

over public roads and the monitoring of potentially radioactive airborne dust caused by work at 

the site. The NRC notified CEMC of the investigation results on Feb. 28, and CEMC and the 

NRC decided to use the NRC’s alternative dispute resolution process. As part of the agreement, 

the NRC will not pursue further enforcement action related to this issue. 

 The Molycorp facility operated from 1964 to 1970, producing an iron alloy from ore that 

contained natural thorium and uranium. Mildly radioactive thorium slag was used as ground fill 

throughout the 17-acre site. 

 CEMC is the successor organization to Molycorp and is cleaning up the site, now known 

as the Washington, Pa., Decommissioning Site. The license was transferred to the 

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania March 31, when Pennsylvania became an NRC Agreement 

State and took over the regulation of radioactive material within the state. 

 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-127 July 9, 2008
§ 919.705 What does the suspending official consider in issuing a suspension? ( a ) In determining the adequacy of the evidence to support the suspension, the suspending official considers how much information is available, how credible it is given the circumstances, whether or not important allegations are corroborated, and what inferences can reasonably be drawn as a result. During this assessment, the suspending official may examine the basic documents, including grants, cooperative agreements, loan authorizations, contracts, and other relevant documents.
( b ) An indictment, conviction, civil judgment, or other official findings by Federal, State, or local bodies that determine factual and/or legal matters, constitutes adequate evidence for purposes of suspension actions.
( c ) In deciding whether immediate action is needed to protect the public interest, the suspending official has wide discretion. For example, the suspending official may infer the necessity for immediate action to protect the public interest either from the nature of the circumstances giving rise to a cause for suspension or from potential business relationships or involvement with a program of the Federal Government.
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 200 9-0 819

DCN: SE020 8 9

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS I NFORMATION

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
#### In the Matter of M. Fred Hirsch, Respondent, against Paul L. Ross et al., Constituting the Temporary City Housing Rent Commission of the City of New York, Respondents, and Dorset Hotel Corporation, Appellant.

Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 705.]
### SUBCHAPTER III—PAYMENT OF BENEFITS
#### § 30.51 Statistical information required for import entries.

The information required for statistical purposes is, in most cases, also required by CBP regulations for other purposes. Refer to CBP Web site at *http://www.cbp.gov* to download “Instructions for Preparation of CBP-7501,” for completing the paper entry summary documentation (CBP-7501). Refer to the Customs and Trade Automated Interface Requirements for instructions on submitting an ABI electronic record, or instructions for completing CBP-226 for declaring any equipment, repair parts, materials purchased, or expense for repairs incurred outside of the United States.
NRC SCHEDULES REGULATORY CONFERENCE TO DISCUSS APPARENT 

VIOLATIONS AT OCONEE NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a regulatory conference with 

officials of Duke Energy on Nov. 16 to discuss apparent violations of NRC requirements involving 

the condition of the Oconee nuclear plant’s standby shutdown facility, which is used when normal 

and other emergency systems are unavailable.

Oconee is operated by Duke Energy near Seneca, S.C., about 30 miles west of Greenville.

NRC and Duke officials will discuss the safety significance of two apparent violations 

related to the inoperability of electrical breakers needed for the standby shutdown facility to 

function. The standby shutdown facility is a redundant emergency safety system used to safely shut 

down the reactors under certain conditions.

The regulatory conference is scheduled for 9:30 a.m. EST in the NRC’s Region II office, 

located at 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200 in Atlanta. The public is invited to attend the 

meeting and NRC officials will be available to answer questions.

The two apparent violations have preliminarily been classified as “greater than green.” The 

NRC evaluates regulatory performance at commercial nuclear power plants with a color-coded 

system which classifies findings as green, white, yellow or red, in increasing order of safety 

significance. A “white” finding, the level above green, has a low to moderate safety significance.

No decisions on the final safety significance or possible enforcement action will be made at 

the regulatory conference. Those decisions will be made by NRC officials at a later time.

The NRC inspection report in which the apparent violations are documented is publicly 

available on the NRC website in ADAMS by using accession number ML11277A253.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES link 

on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to 

NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No: II-11-065

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416

 November 7, 2011 

E-mail: OPA2.Resource@nrc.gov