alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §8501. Vesting of property left by decedents

(a) Personal property left by any decedent upon premises used as a Department facility, which premises are subject to the exclusive legislative jurisdiction of the United States and are within the exterior boundaries of any State or dependency of the United States, shall vest and be disposed of as provided in this subchapter, except that—

(1) if such person died leaving a last will and testament probated under the laws of the place of such person's domicile or under the laws of the State or dependency of the United States within the exterior boundaries of which such premises or a part thereof may be, the personal property of such decedent situated upon such premises shall vest in the person or persons entitled thereto under the provisions of such last will and testament; and

(2) if such person died leaving any such property not disposed of by a last will and testament probated in accord with the provisions of paragraph (1) such property shall vest in the persons entitled to take such property by inheritance under and upon the conditions provided by the law of the decedent's domicile. This paragraph shall not apply to property to which the United States is entitled except where such title is divested out of the United States.

(b) Any officer or employee of the United States in possession of any such property may deliver same to the executor (or the administrator with will annexed) who shall have qualified in either jurisdiction as provided in subsection (a)(1); or if none such then to the domiciliary administrator or to any other qualified administrator who shall demand such property. When delivery shall have been made to any such executor or administrator in accordance with this subsection, neither the United States nor any officer or employee thereof shall be liable therefor.

(Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1256, §5201; Pub. L. 99–576, title VII, §701(93), Oct. 28, 1986, 100 Stat. 3299; renumbered §8501, Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §402(b)(1), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 238; Pub. L. 102–83, §4(a)(3), (4), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 404.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–40 renumbered section 5201 of this title as this section.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–83 substituted "Department" for "Veterans' Administration" in introductory provisions.

1986—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 99–576 substituted "such person's" for "his".
§ 700.12 Elements of a rated order. ( a ) *Elements required for all rated orders.* ( 1 ) The appropriate priority rating and program identification symbol (*e.g.,* DO-A1, DX-A2, DO-N1).
( 2 ) A required delivery date or dates. The words “immediately” or “as soon as possible” do not constitute a delivery date. When a “requirements contract,” “basic ordering agreement,” “prime vendor contract,” or similar procurement document bearing a priority rating contains no specific delivery date or dates, but provides for the furnishing of items from time-to-time or within a stated period against specific purchase orders, such as “calls,” “requisitions,” and “delivery orders,” the purchase orders supporting such contracts or agreements must specify a required delivery date or dates and are to be considered as rated as of the date of their receipt by the supplier and not as of the date of the original procurement document.
( 3 ) The written signature on a manually placed order, or the digital signature or name on an electronically placed order, of an individual authorized to sign rated orders for the person placing the order. The signature, manual or digital, certifies that the rated order is authorized under this part and that the requirements of this part are being followed.
( 4 ) A statement that reads in substance: “This is a rated order certified for national defense use and you are required to follow all the provisions of the Defense Priorities and Allocations System regulation (15 CFR part 700).”
( b ) *Additional element required for certain emergency preparedness rated orders.* If a rated order is placed for the purpose of emergency preparedness requirements and expedited action is necessary or appropriate to meet these requirements, the following statement must be included in the order: “This rated order is placed for the purpose of emergency preparedness. It must be accepted or rejected within [Insert a time limit no less than the minimum applicable time limit specified in § 700.13(d)(2)].”
[79 FR 47565, Aug. 14, 2014, as amended at 89 FR 58971, July 22, 2024]
###### Editorial Note on Subpart G of Part 9701

#### Editorial Note:

At 73 FR 58435, Oct. 7, 2008, the application of subpart G to part 9701 was rescinded.

#### § 9701.709 Actions involving discrimination.

Section 7702 of title 5, U.S. Code, is modified to read “MSPB or MRP” wherever the terms “Merit Systems Protection Board” or “Board” are used.
#### Lottie E. Fish, Appellee, v. William H. Fish, Appellant.

Gen. No. 21,295.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Charles M. Walker, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the March term, 1915.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed January 3, 1916.

Statement of the Case.

Appeal by the defendant, William H. Fish, from a decretal order entered November 21, 1914, adjudging 'hifn guilty of contempt in failing to pay to complainant $228, the amount of alimony decreed to her July 10, 1910, at the rate of $12 per month from March, 1913. By a former order entered October 10, 1913, defendant was adjudged guilty of contempt in failing to pay the alimony decreed to complainant up to and including March, 1913. From that order he prosecuted a writ *336of error to the Appellate Court and the order was affirmed October 5, 1915. See *Fish v. Fish,*194 Ill. App. 521.

Abstract of the Decision.

1. Judgment, § *648*—when judgment not merged in bond.*A judgment adjudging one guilty of contempt in failing to pay alimony decreed to complainant is not merged in the bond filed thereunder, nor is the debt thereby satisfied.

2. Appeal and error, § *709*
      ***
      *—when issue of writ of error does not stop further proceeding.*The fact that a writ of error has been issued in a proceeding to adjudge defendant guilty of contempt in failing to pay alimony, and has been made a supersedeas, does not prevent complainant from further proceeding to collect subsequently accruing instalments of alimony.

William H. Fish, *pro se,*and E. M. Seymour, for appellant.

Fred A. Bangs, for appellee; Bichard H. Colby, of counsel.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice Baker

delivered the opinion of the court.
<PAGE>
                                                                  Page 11 of 24

                                                                  EXHIBIT 99(c)

                        KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 1999-B
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

JPMorgan Chase Bank                      Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas
fka, Bank One National Association       fka, Bankers Trust Company
One Bank One Plaza, Suite 0126           60 Wall Street, 26th Floor
Chicago, IL  60670                       New York, NY 10005
Attn: Corporate Trust Administration     Attn: Structured Finance Services
Phone: (312) 407-0192                    Mail Stop NYC60-2606
Fax:   (312) 407-1708                    Phone: (212) 250-8522
                                         Fax    (212) 797-8606

Key Bank USA, National Association
800 Superior Ave, 4th Floor
Cleveland, OH 44114
Attn: President, KER
Phone: (216) 828-4293
Fax:   (216) 828-9301



Pursuant to Section 3.08 of the Subservicing Agreement between Key Bank USA,
National Association as Master Servicer and Great Lakes Educational Loan
Services, Inc., as Subservicer, dated as of September 1, 1999 (the "Agreement"),
the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) a review of the activities of the
Subservicer from January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2003, and of its
performance under the Agreement has been made, and (ii) to the best of the
undersigned's knowledge, based on the review, the Subservicer has fulfilled all
its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period.

The undersigned also hereby certifies that the Subservicer has disclosed to the
Master Servicer and to the Trust's certified public accountants all significant
deficiencies relating to the Subservicer's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards in accordance with a review conducted in compliance with the standard
as set forth in the Agreement.

                                    Great Lakes Educational Loan Services,
                                      Inc.,

Subservicer

Date: February 09, 2004             By:    /S/ MICHAEL J. NOACK
                                       -------------------------
                                    Name: Michael J. Noack
                                    Title: Chief Servicing Officer
### SUBCHAPTER III—PLANNING PROCESS
BISNIS Trades & Tenders, March 8, 1999 -- Part 1

----

International Copyright, U.S. & Foreign Commercial Service and U.S. Department of State,1997.      All rights reserved outside of the United States.
The Business Information Service for the Newly Independent States (BISNIS) is the U.S.Department ofCommerce's information clearinghouse on trade and investment in the emerging markets of thenewlyindependent states of the former Soviet Union.  BISNIS has created the "BISNIS Trades &Tenders"electronic newsletter to help U.S. companies find business opportunities in these expandingmarkets.
These opportunities are provided solely as an informational service and do not represent anendorsementby the U.S. Department of Commerce. Verification of leads is the responsibility of the reader.BISNISmay consider other private sector-generated trade leads and tenders, in electronic form only, andpublishon a space-available basis.  Please send your leads to [email protected]
A full selection of BISNIS leads and other market intelligence is available via BISNIS OnLineat: www.mac.doc.gov/BISNIS
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed May 17, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-1206

Lower Tribunal No. 12-42427

________________

Jessica Hagan,

Appellant,

vs.

Scott M. Chisholm,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose M. 

Rodriguez, Judge.

The Hall Law Firm, P.A., and Adam S. Hall and Roarke Maxwell, for 

appellant.

Black Srebnick, P.A., and Donald J. Hodson, for appellee.

Before SCALES, HENDON and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
CP^ . <>^ .^>-^ . 

V i;;Aiv5F0RMTI0W . 

^^^^_; ^ ,2U^L ^ ^^^.^w ^ -^^^--^^ ._ . .^ 

fcA-/*? 

^-^ - ^ 

^,_; ^ ^^•^.^—^'^ ^ 

.•g:3i.<.- z^^u^-^-^^^^A^ 

/iM^^ —
§ 712.2 Restrictions on activities involving Schedule 1 chemicals. ( a ) You may not produce Schedule 1 chemicals for protective purposes.
( b ) You may not import any Schedule 1 chemical unless: ( 1 ) The import is from a State Party;
( 2 ) The import is for research, medical, pharmaceutical, or protective purposes;
( 3 ) The import is in types and quantities strictly limited to those that can be justified for such purposes; and
( 4 ) You have notified BIS at least 45 calendar days prior to the import, pursuant to § 712.6 of the CWCR. Note 1 to § 712.2 ( b
):
Pursuant to § 712.6, advance notifications of import of saxitoxin of 5 milligrams or less for medical/diagnostic purposes must be submitted to BIS at least 3 days prior to import.
Note 2 to § 712.2 ( b
):
For specific provisions relating to the prior advance notification of exports of all Schedule 1 chemicals, see § 745.1 of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) (15 CFR parts 730 through 774). For specific provisions relating to license requirements for exports of Schedule 1 chemicals, see § 742.2 and § 742.18 of the EAR for Schedule 1 chemicals subject to the jurisdiction of the Department of Commerce and see the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (22 CFR parts 120 through 130) for Schedule 1 chemicals subject to the jurisdiction of the Department of State.
( c ) ( 1 ) The provisions of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section do not apply to the retention, ownership, possession, transfer, or receipt of a Schedule 1 chemical by a department, agency, or other entity of the United States, or by a person described in paragraph (c)(2) of this section, pending destruction of the Schedule 1 chemical;
( 2 ) A person referred to in paragraph (c)(1) of this section is: ( i ) Any person, including a member of the Armed Forces of the United States, who is authorized by law or by an appropriate officer of the United States to retain, own, possess transfer, or receive the Schedule 1 chemical; or
( ii ) In an emergency situation, any otherwise non-culpable person if the person is attempting to seize or destroy the Schedule 1 chemical.
[71 FR 24929, Apr. 27, 2006, as amended at 73 FR 78183, Dec. 22, 2008]
§ 950.801 Accounting and distribution. ( a ) *Remittance.* One electronic funds of the transfer (EFT) will be transmitted by the payroll office each pay period, in the gross amount of deductions on the basis of current authorizations, to the CCA. ( 1 ) The EFT will be accompanied by an electronic transmittal identifying the Federal agency, the dates of the pay period, the pay period number, employee names and deduction amounts per individual employee.
( b ) *Accounting.* ( 1 ) OPM may require Federal payroll offices to oversee the establishment of individual allotment accounts, the deductions each pay period, and the reconciliation of employee accounts in accordance with agency and Federal Accounting Standards and Office of Management and Budget requirements. OPM may further require that Federal payroll offices ensure the accuracy of remittances, as supported by current allotment authorizations, and internal accounting and auditing requirements.
( 2 ) The CCA shall notify the federations, national and international organizations, and local organizations as soon as practicable after the completion of the campaign, but in no case later than a date to be determined by OPM, of the amounts, if any, designated to them and their member agencies. The date will be part of the annual timetable issued by the Director under § 950.601(b). The CCA is also responsible for distributing credit card, debit card, e-check, check and money order receipts and payroll deductions transmitted by the payroll offices. It is responsible for the accuracy of disbursements it transmits to recipients. The CCA will distribute all CFC receipts beginning April 1, and monthly thereafter. It shall remit the contributions to each organization or to the federation, if any, of which the organization is a member. At the close of each disbursement period, the CFC account shall have a balance of zero, based on the last reconciled bank statement.
( 3 ) Federated organizations, or their designated agents, are responsible for: ( i ) The accuracy of distribution among the charitable organizations of remittances from the CCA; and
( ii ) Arrangements for an independent audit conducted by a certified public accountant agreed upon by the participating charitable organizations.
### §3175. Acceptance of gifts of property

The Administrator of General Services, and the United States Postal Service where that office is concerned, may accept on behalf of the Federal Government unconditional gifts of property in aid of any project or function within their respective jurisdictions.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1155.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3175 | 40:298a. | June 16, 1949, ch. 218, title IV, §404, 63 Stat. 199. |

Section

The words "Administrator of General Services" are substituted for "Federal Works Administrator" because of section 103(a) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (ch. 288, 63 Stat. 380), which is restated as section 303(c) [303(b)] of the revised title. The words "United States Postal Service" are substituted for "Postmaster General" because of section 6(o) of the Postal Reorganization Act (Public Law 91–375, 84 Stat. 783). The words "real, personal, or other" are omitted as unnecessary.
### §7262. Fee for filing appeals

(a) The Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims may impose a fee of not more than $50 for the filing of any appeal with the Court. The Court shall establish procedures under which such a fee may be waived in the case of an appeal filed by or on behalf of a person who demonstrates that the requirement that such fee be paid will impose a hardship on that person. A decision as to such a waiver is final and may not be reviewed in any other court.

(b) The Court may from time to time adjust the maximum amount permitted for a fee imposed under subsection (a) of this section based upon inflation and similar fees charged by other courts established under Article I of the Constitution.

(Added Pub. L. 100–687, div. A, title III, §301(a), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4115, §4062; renumbered §7262, Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §402(b)(1), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 238; amended Pub. L. 105–368, title V, §512(a)(1), Nov. 11, 1998, 112 Stat. 3341.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1998—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 105–368 substituted "Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims" for "Court of Veterans Appeals".

1991—Pub. L. 102–40 renumbered section 4062 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1998 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 105–368 effective on first day of first month beginning more than 90 days after Nov. 11, 1998, see section 513 of Pub. L. 105–368, set out as a note under section 7251 of this title.
#### § 25.11 Referral of complaint and answer to the ALJ.

Upon receipt of an answer, the reviewing official shall file the complaint and answer with the ALJ.
Exhibit 12.1
  1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Global Sources Ltd.
 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 4.  The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 (b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such an evaluation; and
 (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.  The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
  
 /s/ Merle A. Hinrich

Merle A. Hinrich

Director and Executive Chairman
---

Addendum to the loan agreement dated 02/03/2006

Extension

LOAN AGREEMENT

between

DTB Patente GmbH represented by the managing director
Rainer Rotthäuser Goethestrasse 59, 45721 Haltern am See

- in the following referred to as
lender -

and

EDI Exploration Drilling International GmbH represented by
the managing director Günter Thiemann Goethestraße 59, 45721 Haltern am
See

- in the following referred to as
borrower -

The loan agreement, to which this addendum applies, is changed,
effective immediately, in § 2 paragraphs 2 and 3 and as follows:

§ 2 Interest, term and repayment of loan

|1. | The annual interest payable on the loan shall be 6.0
      %.           
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                         
|2. | The term shall be extended by 6 months, thus ending on
      31/03/2008.
|   |                                                                         
|3. | The loan shall be repaid on 31/03/2008 into the lenders
      account. 

All of the other provisions of the agreement remain unchanged
and valid.

|Haltern, on September 25, 2007                |                                              
|--------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------
|                                              | Signature                                    
|_____________________________________________ | _____________________________________________
|DTB Patente GmbH                              | EDI Exploration Drilling International GmbH  
|- Lender -                                    | - Borrower -                                 

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE, ACCOUNTING AND

FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of New PacificVentures, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2005, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I Brent Petterson, Secretary/Treasurer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

   (1)  the Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

   (2)  the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/Brent PettersonBrent PettersonSecretary/TreasurerSeptember 12, 2005
#### Cunie Lefkowitz, Appellant, v. Greenwich Savings Bank, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Townley, Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Callahan, J., dissents and votes to reverse and grant a new trial, on the ground that the negligence of the defendant was a question of fact for the jury.