alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC CHAIRMAN GREGORY B. JACZKO’S REMARKS BEFORE A BRIEFING BY 

THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS

Note: The NRC Commissioners were briefed today by the agency’s Advisory Committee on 

Reactor Safeguards. 

At our Commission meeting today, we discussed the recent activities of the Advisory 

Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS). The ACRS has a significant role in the review and 

resolution of key technical issues. I always find the ACRS views and comments on NRC’s 

activities -- ranging from significant licensing actions to the development of regulatory guidance 

documents -- to be extremely helpful in my decision making and education on the many 

important matters before the Commission. 

Today, the ACRS shared with us its views on containment overpressure, Closure of 

Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria (ITAAC)/ Design Acceptance Criteria 

(DAC), AP1000 Design certification review and cyber security. 

The Commission truly appreciates the important work the Committee performs for the 

agency and I would like to take a couple of minutes to particularly express the Commission’s 

appreciation for the work of two of is members. 

Mario Bonaca, the current ACRS Chairman, has decided to step down as Chairman to 

provide the opportunity to other members to serve in this capacity. Mario had previously served 

as chairman in 2003 and 2004. The Commission appreciates his leadership in handling several 

complex technical issues, including State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analyses, the 

Containment Accident Pressure Issue, and the ITAAC closure process, as well as Design 

Certification and Combined License Application reviews. 

Otto Maynard, who has been with the Committee for four years, will retire in January 

2010 to spend more time with his family. During his tenure, he reviewed several significant 

issues, especially some high-visibility license renewal applications at Indian Point and Oyster 

Creek. He has also contributed significantly to the review of the US-APWR Design Certification 

application. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 09-193 December 4, 2009
The ACRS continues to provide insightful recommendations to the Commission, which 

myself and the other Commissioners find very valuable. 

A video and transcript of today’s Commission meeting will be available soon on the NRC 

Web site at: http://video.nrc.gov/ and http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/commission/tr/ , respectively.

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
NRC SCHEDULES PUBLIC MEETING JUNE 23 TO DISCUSS

IMPLEMENTING FINGERPRINT RULE FOR RESEARCH AND TEST REACTORS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a meeting for Thursday, June 

23, from 9 a.m. to 11a.m., to discuss the implementation of a final rule requiring fingerprintbased criminal history records checks of individuals seeking unescorted access to research and

test reactors.

NRC staff will begin the meeting with a presentation on implementing the final rule, 

followed by an opportunity for open discussion. The public is invited to participate in this 

meeting.

The meeting will be held at the NRC Headquarters, 11555 Rockville Pike, room O-7B4. 

A complete agenda is available on the NRC’s public meeting schedule Web page. 

More information and all associated documents about the final rule can be found on 

regulations.gov website by using the docket identification NRC-2008-0619 as the keyword.

Anyone with questions regarding the meeting or for teleconference/webinar conferencing 

services should contact Scott Sloan at (301) 415-1619.

###

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand.

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC’s website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-106 June 14, 2011
Exhibit 10.80



 



Exhibit 10.80


INSURANCE BONUS AGREEMENT



Erie Indemnity Company, a Pennsylvania business corporation (the “Employer”),
and Michael J. Krahe (the “Executive”) intending to be legally bound hereby
agree as follows:



	 	1.	 	The Employer agrees to pay all premiums on life insurance Policy
No.
16 352 040 insuring Executive’s life issued by the Northwestern Mutual
Life Insurance Company of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and owned by Executive
as long as Executive remains employed by the Employer. No
contributions toward the payment of premiums by the Executive are
required.
	 
	 	2.	 	The Executive will execute an endorsement on the policy restricting
the Executive’s right to (a) surrender the policy for its cash value,
(b) obtain a policy loan from the insurance company, (c) assign the
policy as collateral, (d) change the ownership of the policy by
endorsement or assignment, or (e) change insured. The Employer shall
not be entitled to receive any benefits under the policy.
	 
	 	 	 	Employer shall release the endorsement after fifteen (15) years have
passed if Executive was continuously employed by the Employer
throughout that time. If Executive’s employment is terminated for any
reason by either party during that fifteen (15) year period, the
Employer is under no obligation to release the endorsement. However,
if employment is terminated prior to that time, the Executive retains
the right to convert the policy to a plan of paid up insurance.
	 
	 	3.	 	The Executive will recognize the premium paid hereunder as
additional compensation for federal income tax purposes.
	 
	 	4.	 	The Employer shall, in addition to the premium payment, annually
increase the Executive’s normal compensation by an amount determined by
the following formula: P/1-X where P equals premium paid by the
Employer on the policy pursuant to this Agreement and X equals the
Executive’s marginal Federal income tax bracket for such year plus the
tax rate for any of the following that may be applicable:




	 	(a)	 	Pennsylvania income tax;
	 
	 	(b)	 	Employee portion of Pennsylvania
unemployment tax;
	 
	 	(c)	 	Local income tax;
	 
	 	(d)	 	Employee portion of FICA OASDI; and
	 
	 	(e)	 	Employee portion of FICA Medicare.




	 	5.	 	This Agreement is being delivered and is intended to be performed
in Pennsylvania and shall be construed and enforced in accordance with
the laws of Pennsylvania.




60






 







	 	6.	 	This Agreement is the entire understanding among the parties and
may be altered, amended or revoked only by subsequent written
instrument executed by all parties.



WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement this 23rd day of
December, 2003.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	
By:
	 	/s/ Douglas F. Ziegler
	 	 	 	 	

	(Corporate Seal)	 	 	 	Douglas F. Ziegler, Senior Vice President
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	
Attest:
	 	/s/ Jan R. Van Gorder
	 	 	 	 	

	 	 	 	 	 Jan R. Van Gorder, Secretary
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	/s/ Michael J. Krahe
	 	 	 	 	

	 	 	 	 	 Employee




61
No. II-09-059draft October 22, 2009 

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 562-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 562-4416 

NRC AUGMENTS INSPECTION AT NUCLEAR FUEL SERVICES 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has formed an Augmented Inspection Team to further 

review the circumstances associated with an Oct. 13 incident at the Nuclear Fuel Services facility in 

Erwin, Tenn. 

That incident involved unexpected levels of heat and nitrogen compound gas fumes during 

the dissolution of scrap material from Department of Energy projects containing low levels of 

uranium. 

An Augmented Inspection Team or AIT is formed by the NRC to review more significant 

events or issues at NRC-licensed facilities, and the AIT will expand the scope of the special 

inspection team sent to the site earlier this week. The AIT will include members of the special 

inspection team as well as at least one additional inspector. The AIT will be led by NRC Region II 

Branch Chief George Hopper. 

“This particular incident did not involve nuclear criticality issues, but it shows the need for 

NFS management to improve some aspects of their operational and decision-making processes,” 

said NRC Region II Administrator Luis Reyes. “Upgrading our inspection to an AIT underscores 

our commitment to evaluate these issues thoroughly and ensure they are being properly addressed.” 

The AIT will hold an exit meeting with the company upon completion of the inspection to 

discuss its preliminary findings. That meeting will be open to interested members of the public and 

the news media, and team members will be available to answer questions after the results are 

presented. The AIT will also issue a written report 30 days after the completion of the inspection. 

 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
#### John Beilman, as and Composing the Firm of Beilman, McCusker & Riester, and Another, Respondents, *v.*United Surety Company, Appellant.

*Injunction*— *equity*— *removal of funds.*

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, made at Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 13th day of November, 1911, in favor of plaintiffs, on the report of a referee.

Per Curiam:

No sufficient ground appears to reject the findings made by the learned referee, who saw and heard the conflicting witnesses. We now have no such opportunity as he had to weigh their credibility and to find on which side was the truth. Furthermore, the natural probabilities seem to favor the plaintiffs, especially on the issue as to which party should bear defendant’s share of the administrative expenses to be incurred by the reinsurance committee. Neither can defendant now defeat recovery on the ground that this was not a suit in equity because plaintiffs had a remedy at law. The relief sought was that the court should pronounce and declare broken a subsisting contract, and enjoin paying over certain moneys subject to plaintiffs’ claims. This power to adjudge such a breach and to free one party from going on further under the contract, with an injunction against removal of the funds from the State, rests in equity. (16 Oye. 108.) That, after suit had been begun and injunction issued, the parties themselves by mutual stipulation terminated the contract, did not detract from the original character of the suit. After consenting to refer all the issues, and without raising such a point before the referee, defendant cannot now be heard to say that plaintiffs’ remedy was at law triable only by a jury. The judgment is, therefore, affirmed, with costs. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
EXHIBIT 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature
appears below constitutes and appoints J. Philip Hester, Sr., his
Attorney-in-Fact, with full power of substitution, for him and in his name,
place and stead, and in any and all capacities, to sign this Form 10-KSB and any
amendment thereto, and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and such other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
and hereby ratifies and confirms all that said Attorney-in-Fact, or his
substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

         In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below
by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and
on the dates indicated.


/s/ J. Philip Hester, Sr.
-------------------------
J. Philip Hester, Sr.
Chief Executive Officer, President and
Director (principal executive officer)
March 28, 2004


-------------------------
Ralph Millard Bowen
Director
March 28, 2004



/s/ Marcus C. Byrd, Jr.
-------------------------
Marcus C. Byrd, Jr.
Director
March 28, 2004


/s/ Glennon C. Grogan
-------------------------
Glennon C. Grogan
Director
March 28, 2004



/s/ James H. Grogan
-------------------------
James H. Grogan
Secretary and Director
March 28, 2004


<PAGE>

-------------------------
Andrew M. Head
Director
March 28, 2004


/s/ Bruce T. Howard
-------------------------
Bruce T. Howard
Director
March 28, 2004



/s/ David E, Johnson
-------------------------
David E. Johnson
Chairman of the Board of Directors
March 28, 2004



/s/ Deborah F. McLeod
-------------------------
Deborah F. McLeod
Chief Financial Officer (principal
accounting officer)
March 28, 2004



-------------------------
William A. McRae
Director
March 28, 2004



/s/ Kim M. Mills
-------------------------
Kim M. Mills
Director
March 28, 2004



/s/ Russell M. Wallace
-------------------------
Russell M. Wallace
Director
March 28, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 222 (Thursday, November 18, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 67594]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25569]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Microbial Immunity in 
IBD.
    Date: December 8, 2004.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Dan E. Matsumoto, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, Room 749, 6707 Democracy 
Boulevard, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, 
(301) 594-8894. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0d606c797e7860627962694d6875797f6c23636469696623636465236a627b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="462b273235332b2932292206233e32342768282f22222d68282f2e68212930">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 10, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-25569 Filed 11-17-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### §11311. Responsibilities

In fulfilling the responsibilities assigned under chapter 35 of title 44, the head of each executive agency shall comply with this subchapter with respect to the specific matters covered by this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1239.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 11311 | 40:1421. | Pub. L. 104–106, div. E, title LI, §5121, Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 683. |

Section

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Procurement of Automatic Data Processing Equipment for Tax Systems Modernization Program; Delegation of Authority

Pub. L. 104–52, title V, §526, Nov. 19, 1995, 109 Stat. 495, provided that: "Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Administrator of General Services shall delegate the authority to procure automatic data processing equipment for the Tax Systems Modernization Program to the Secretary of the Treasury: Provided, That the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall have the authority to revoke such delegation upon the written recommendation of the Administrator that the Secretary's actions under such delegation are inconsistent with the goals of economic and efficient procurement and utilization of automatic data processing equipment: Provided further, That for all other purposes, a procurement conducted under such delegation shall be treated as if made under a delegation by the Administrator pursuant to [former] 40 U.S.C. 759."
Exhibit 32.2

Certification  Pursuant  to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. ss.1350)

I,  Thomas W.  Martin,  Chief  Operating  Officer  and Chief  Financial  Officer
(Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) of ICON Capital Corp., the Manager
of the  Registrant in connection  with the Quarterly  Report of ICON Income Fund
Ten, LLC (the "LLC") on Form 10-Q for the period  ended June 30, 2006,  as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Quarterly
Report")  certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.   The Quarterly  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78m); and

2.   The information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     LLC.


Dated: August 14, 2006

/s/ Thomas W. Martin
------------------------------------
Thomas W. Martin
Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
ICON Capital Corp.
Manager of ICON Income Fund Ten, LLC
### SUBCHAPTER IV—ACQUIRING AND DISPOSING OF LAND
### SUBCHAPTER II—STATE APPROVING AGENCIES

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior subchapter II of this chapter was redesignated as subchapter III of this chapter by Pub. L. 117–333, §2(a)(1), Jan. 5, 2023, 136 Stat. 6122.

#### Amendments

2023—Pub. L. 117–333, §2(a)(1), Jan. 5, 2023, 136 Stat. 6122, redesignated subchapter I of this chapter as this subchapter.
1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344 *Pages 233-239 - Confidential Statements of 

## *Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment*454647484950*Pages 233-239 - Confidential Statements of Formula may be entitled to confidential treatment**Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*51*Pages 51-58 Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*596061626364656667686970717273747576777879808182838485

### *P ages 86 - 87 - C on fid en ti a l St a t emen ts o f F ormu l a may b e en titl e d t o con fid en ti a l t rea t men t*
From: Bartlett, Matthew 

Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 1:57 PM 

To: Bartlett, Matthew 

Subject: RE: Email Call Summary between INIS and the Financial Assurance Reviewer 

re: Follow-up RAIs 

From: Bartlett, Matthew 

Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 8:52 AM 

To: Przygodzki, Roman; 

Cc: John J. Miller 

Subject: RE: Email Call Summary between INIS and the Financial Assurance Reviewer re: Follow-up 

RAIs 

Roman, John, Jim,

 

Here is a the call summary of the discussion we had regarding Financial Assurance. Thanks.

 

On May 26, 2011, the NRC and International Isotopes Inc. (INIS) held a conference call 

to discuss follow-up questions to the responses for the financial assurance requests for 

additional information (RAI). The NRC staff had 6 follow-up questions about FA-2, FA-5 

and FA-7, see attached. The NRC staff asked how remaining inventories of DUF4 and 

DUF6 would be disposed of at decommissioning and whether the costs of disposal are 

included in the cost estimates. The costs have not been included, but INIS will provide 

the necessary information in response to the follow-up RAIs. The data and calculations 

in the financial assurance tables were discussed. INIS plans to update the tables to 

improve clarity. They also indicated that future updates regarding financial assurance 

would be provided to the NRC on a regular schedule consistent with the regulatory 

requirements and applicable license conditions.

 

The NRC staff will provide the follow-up questions as formal RAIs. 

The following individuals participated in the call 

NRC STAFF: INIS STAFF / 

CONTRACTORS: 

Matt Bartlett – NMSS, Project Manager; John Miller – 

INIS, Licensing Manager, CHP 

Roman Przygodzki – FSME, Financial Assurance reviewer Jim Thomas – 

President of Advanced Process Technology Systems (APTS) 

Mike Davis – 

APTS; 

and Sheri 

Stephenson – APTS

Sincerely, 

 

Matt Bartlett 

Project Manager 

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 
NMSS/FCSS/AFCB 

(301)-492-3119
#### Maud Ordway, Appellant, v. Thomas J. Hilliard et al., Respondents.

Present—Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.
#### Josephine Young, Respondent, v. Lester A. Sonking et al., Appellants.

*872Present — Foster, P J., Heffernan, Brewster, Deyo and Santry, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Alexander Teitler, Respondent, against McDermott & McDonald, Appellant.

In a proceeding by an assignee of moneys unpaid to a general contractor, for work on a public improvement, the assignee’s motion to cancel and discharge appellant’s notice of mechanic’s lien was granted on the ground that the notice is void in that the verification form is not subscribed by appellant. Appellant’s signature appears at the end of the body of the notice, immediately before the language of the verification form which contains appellant’s name and the notary’s signature. Order reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, motion denied, without costs, and petition dismissed. In our opinion, the defect in the verification form is subject to amendment on application by appellant under section 12-a of the Lien Law. The cases to the contrary cited in the majority opinion in *Fries*v. *Bray*(279 App. Div. 8) were decided prior to the enactment of section 12-a by chapter 627 of the Laws of 1932. The notice as filed complies in substance with section 12 of the Lien Law, gives adequate notice of the lienor’s claim; and the right to assert the lien is not to be destroyed by an amendable defect. Adel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., concur; Nolan, P. J., dissents and votes to affirm, with the following memorandum: The failure to sign the verification constituted a defect of substance, not subject to amendment under section 12-a of the Lien Law. *(Kingston*v. *M. S. Constr. Corp.,*249 N. Y. 533; *Ponsrok*v. *City of Yonkers,*254 N. Y. 91; *Mozarsky*v. *Whinston Bros.,*228 App. Div. 642, affd. 254 N. Y. 552; *Fries*v. *Bray,*279 App. Div. 8.) Section 12-a may not be construed as giving the court power to construct a valid lien out of a defective notice. *(Matter of Frank Teicher, Inc.,*v. *Gold,*239 App. Div. 285; *Toop*v. *Smith,*181 N. Y. 283, 289.)