alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 30.70 Violation of the Clean Diamond Trade Act. Section 8(c) of the Clean Diamond Trade Act (CDTA) authorizes U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to enforce the laws and regulations governing exports of rough diamonds. The Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) also has enforcement authority pursuant to section 5(a) of the CDTA, Executive Order 13312, and Rough Diamonds Control Regulations (31 CFR part 592). CBP, ICE, and OFAC are authorized to enforce provisions of the CDTA providing the following civil and criminal penalties: ( a ) *Civil penalties.* A civil penalty not to exceed $10,000 may be imposed on any person who violates, or attempts to violate, any order or regulation issued under the Act.
( b ) *Criminal penalties.* For the willful violation or attempted violation of any license, order, or regulation issued under the Act, a fine not to exceed $50,000, shall be imposed upon conviction or: ( 1 ) If a natural person, imprisoned for not more than ten years, or both;
( 2 ) If an officer, director, or agent of any corporation, who willfully participates in such violation, imprisoned for not more than ten years, or both.
[73 FR 31555, June 2, 2008, as amended at 83 FR 17751, Apr. 24, 2018]
§ 5.3 Assignment of functions and authorities. ( a ) The Director, Office of Administrative Services, shall carry out the Department's responsibility to provide, in accordance with applicable law and regulation, the maximum opportunity for qualified blind persons to operate vending stands.
( b ) Subject to instructions issued by the Director, Office of Administrative Services, the head of each primary organization unit shall be responsible for implementing this program within his area.
( c ) The Director, Office of Administrative Services for the primary organization units located in the main Commerce building and the head of each other primary organization unit will make determinations with respect to the terms of permits including the location and operation of vending stands and machines in their respective areas.
( d ) Unresolved differences and significant violations of the terms of permits shall be reported to the State licensing agency. Where no corrective action is forthcoming, the matter shall be referred to the Office of Vocational Rehabilitation, Department of Education for consideration prior to further action.
[28 FR 7772, July 31, 1963, as amended at 55 FR 53489, Dec. 31, 1990]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Page 19 of 19



                                  EXHIBIT 99(h)

Key Bank USA, National Association          Bankers Trust Company
127 Public Square                              as Indenture Trustee
Cleveland, Ohio  44114-1306                 4 Albany Street, 7th Floor
                                            New York, New York 10015

Bank One, National Association
  as Eligible Lender Trustee
One First National Plaza Suite 0126
Chicago, Illinois  60670

                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT
                      FOR KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 1999-B

We have examined management's assertion, included in its representation letter
dated March 19, 2001 that Key Bank USA, National Association (KBUSA), a wholly
owned subsidiary of KeyCorp, complied with sections 4.04, 4.08(a), 4.08(b),
4.08(c), 5.05, 5.06, 5.07 and 5.08 of the KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 1999-B Sale
and Servicing Agreement and sections 1.(a)(xx), 1.(b)(iii), 2 and 3 of the
KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 1999-B Administration Agreement (collectively, the
"Agreements") as of December 31, 2000 and for the period from January 1, 2000
through December 31, 2000. As discussed in the representation letter, management
is responsible for KBUSA's compliance with those requirements. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about KBUSA's
compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about KBUSA's compliance with
those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances, except that in accordance with Section 5.05 of
the Sale and Servicing Agreement, our examination assumed the accuracy of
reports prepared by KBUSA's student loan processor. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does
not provide a legal determination on KBUSA's compliance with the aforementioned
requirements.

In our opinion, assuming the accuracy of reports prepared by KBUSA's student
loan processor, management's assertion that KBUSA was in compliance with the
sections in the Agreements referred to above, as of December 31, 2000 and for
the period from January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2000, is fairly stated, in
all material respects.

This report is intended solely for your information and is not to be referred to
or distributed for any purpose to anyone who is not authorized to receive such
information as specified in the Agreements or in the exhibits attached thereto.

                                                   /s/  Ernst & Young LLP


Cleveland
March 19, 2001
Exhibit 11

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 

as Adopted Pursuant to 

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of W Candy, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Brian Shenkman, as Chief Executive Officer and as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, respectively, that: 

 

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

November 13, 2003       

By Brian Shenkman
/s/ Brian Shenkman

President, CEO, CFO

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to W Candy, Inc. and will be retained by W Candy, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# TENDER FOR EXPLOITATION OF THREE MINERALDEPOSITS ANNOUNCED

 

SUBJECT COUNTRY                          ARMENIA

POST OF ORIGIN:               YEREVAN

SERIES:                                            INTERNATIONALMARKET INSIGHT (IMI)

DATE OF REPORT:                            1/19/00

AUTHOR:                                           ARMINEYEGHIAZARIAN

APPROVING OFFICER:               JEFFREYHORWITZ

OFFICER'S TITLE:                   ECONOMIC/COMMERCIALOFFICER

 

INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT, U.S. &FOREIGN COMMERCIAL SERVICE AND U.S.

DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 2000.  ALL RIGHTS RESERVED OUTSIDE OF THEUNITED

STATES.

 

     An eleven-member State InterdepartmentalCommission, formed by representatives of the Ministry of Environment and theMinistry of Industry and Trade, announced a tender for the exploitation ofthree mineral deposits of Armenia: the Litchkvaz-Tey gold deposit, the Meghrigranodiorite deposit, and the Artsvakar andezits and basalts field.  The tender is open for both Armenianand foreign companies.

 

     A non-refundable participation fee of20,000 drams (around USD 40) must accompany the application for tender.  Foreign contractors will be charged anadditional fee of USD 50 per package to cover postage expenses.  The application and all fees must bereceived by the License Department of the Ministry of Industry and Trade byFebruary 13.  The commission willprovide bidders with a package of geological data on the proposed fields anddeposits by the end of February. Bidders must then submit a feasibility report with more detailedinformation to the commission in 15 days.

 

For additional information pleasecontact:

 

Ministry of Industry and Trade,License Department

Leonid Hiusnunts, Head

5 Hanrapetutian Street

Yerevan 375010

Armenia

Phone: (374 2) 562-575
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-11-0029 - Plan for Long-Term Update to the Waste Confidence Rule and Intregration With the Extended Storage and Transportation Initiative

Accession Number: ML110330445

Date Released: Tuesday, March 15, 2011

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML110260244 - SECY-11-0029 - Plan for Long-Term Update to the Waste Confidence Rule and Intregration With the Extended Storage and Transportation Initiative (9 page(s), 2/28/2011)
    - ML110330491 - SECY-11-0029 - Enclosure 1: Plan for the Long-Term Update to Waste Confidence Rule (11 page(s), 2/28/2011)
    - ML110330503 - SECY-11-0029 - Enclosure 2: Strategy for Integrating Extended Storage and Transportation Project Plan and Waste Confidence Rule Update Activities (8 page(s), 2/28/2011)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Brett White, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Annual Report of Corio, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this Form 10-K/A
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Corio, Inc.

Dated: March 31, 2004



|/s/    Brett
White                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Brett WhiteExecutive Vice President and
                  Chief Financial Officer

---
© 1995  1999  webmaster@gao.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2438 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2438

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 115 West Pine Street in Hattiesburg, Mississippi, as the ``Major Henry 
                A. Commiskey, Sr. Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 115 
West Pine Street in Hattiesburg, Mississippi, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Major Henry A. Commiskey, Sr. Post Office 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Major Henry A. Commiskey, 
Sr. Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
# L_2016129EN.01005001.xml

| 19.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 129/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 129/50

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 66/2015

of 20 March 2015

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2016/749]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Directive 2014/101/EU of 30 October 2014 amending Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Directive 2014/101/EU of 30 October 2014 amending Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 13ca (Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32014 L 0101: Commission Directive 2014/101/EU of 30 October 2014 (OJ L 311, 31.10.2014, p. 32).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32014 L 0101: Commission Directive 2014/101/EU of 30 October 2014 (OJ L 311, 31.10.2014, p. 32).’.

Article 2

The text of Directive 2014/101/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 21 March 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 20 March 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 311, 31.10.2014, p. 32.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2492

To ensure that recreation benefits are accorded the same weight as hurricane 

and storm damage reduction benefits and environmental restoration benefits. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 17, 2003

Mr. LAMPSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To ensure that recreation benefits are accorded the same 

weight as hurricane and storm damage reduction benefits 

and environmental restoration benefits.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Beach Recre5 ation Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. GIVING RECREATIONAL BENEFITS THE SAME STA7 TUS AS OTHER BEACH RESTORATION BENE8 FITS. 

9 Subsection (e)(2)(B)(i) of the 1st section of the Act 

10 entitled ‘‘An Act authorizing Federal participation in the 
2

•HR 2492 IH 

1 cost of protecting the shores of publicly owned property’’, 

2 approved August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426e), is amended 

3 by adding at the end the following: ‘‘In making such rec4 ommendations, the Secretary shall develop and implement 

5 procedures that treat recreational, hurricane and storm 

6 damage reduction, and environmental restoration benefits 

7 equally.’’.

Æ
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 7, 2018

No. 04-17-00312-CR

Saturnino GUTIERREZ JR.,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15-0462-CR-A

Honorable William Old, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

In this appeal, Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed an Anders brief and notified 

Appellant of his right to file a pro se brief. Thereafter, the State waived its right to file a 

response to the Anders brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). On March 

1, 2018, Appellant Saturnino Gutierrez Jr., who is indigent, moved this court for a free copy of 

the appellate record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.2. 

Appellant’s motion for a free copy of the appellate record is GRANTED. 

We direct the clerk of this court to (1) provide Appellant with a printed copy of the 

appellate record—the clerk’s and reporter’s records—at no cost to Appellant, (2) record in this 

court’s records the date the appellate record was mailed to Appellant, and (3) do both these tasks 

within FIVE DAYS of the date of this order. See id.; Newman v. State, 937 S.W.2d 1, 3 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1996) (“[T]he trial court has a duty to provide an indigent defendant with an 

adequate record on appeal.”). 

The appellate record should be mailed to Appellant at the following address:

Saturnino Gonzalez Jr.

TDCJ Number 01861143

McConnell Unit

3001 Emily Drive
Beeville, TX 78102-8696

Appellant’s pro se brief will be due THIRTY-FIVE DAYS after this court mails

Appellant a printed copy of the appellate record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a).

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of March, 2018.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### § 2004.31 Definitions.

For purposes of this subpart:

*Demand* means a request, order, subpoena or other demand of a federal, state or local court or other authority for records, information or employee testimony in a legal proceeding in which USTR is not a named party.

*Employee* means any current or former employee or officer of USTR, including contractors, detailees, interns, and any individual who has served or is serving in any consulting or advisory capacity to USTR, whether formal or informal.

*General Counsel* means USTR's General Counsel or a person within USTR's Office of General Counsel to whom the General Counsel has delegated authority to act under this subpart.

*Legal proceeding* means any matter, including all phases of litigation, before a court of law, administrative board or tribunal, commission, administrative law judge, hearing officer, or other body that conducts a legal or administrative proceeding.

*Records* or* information* means all documents and materials that are USTR agency records under the FOIA; any original or copy of a record or other property, no matter what media, contained in USTR files; and any other information or materials acquired by a USTR employee in the performance of his or her official duties or because of his or her official status.

*Request* means any informal request, by whatever method, in connection with a legal proceeding, seeking production of records, information or testimony that has not been ordered by a court or other competent authority.

*Testimony* means any written or oral statements, including depositions, answers to interrogatories, affidavits, declarations and recorded interviews made by an individual about USTR information in connection with a legal proceeding.
#### § 241.5 Standard dimensions.

Whenever in the rules and regulations in this part the error on a dimension is mentioned, this error shall be determined by taking the difference between the actual measured dimension and the standard dimension. The error is an error in excess and is to be preceded by a plus sign when the measured dimension is greater than the standard dimension. The error is an error in deficiency and is to be preceded by a minus sign when the measured dimension is less than the standard dimension.

(a) The standard dimensions of a barrel for fruits, vegetables, and other dry commodities other than cranberries, and of a barrel for cranberries, with which the actual measured dimensions are to be compared, are as follows:

| Dimensions | Barrel for fruits, vegetables, and other dry commodities other than cranberries (inches) | Barrel for cranberries (inches) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Diameter of head | 171/8 | 161/4 |
| Effective diameter of head (see [§ 241.4](/on/2024-09-16/title-15/section-241.4)) | 163/4 | 157/8 |
| Distance between heads | 26 | 251/4 |
| Circumference of bulge, outside measurement | 64 | 581/2 |
| Length of stave | 281/2 | 281/2 |

(b) In the case of all subdivisions of the barrel for fruits, vegetables, and other dry commodities other than cranberries, and all subdivisions of the barrel for cranberries, the following dimensions are hereby standardized for the purpose of the application of tolerances, and the actual measured dimensions are to be compared with these:

**Subdivisions of Barrel for Fruits, Vegetables, and Other Dry Commodities Other Than Cranberries**

| Dimensions | 3/4 barrel (inches) | 1/2 barrel (inches) | 1/3 barrel (inches) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Effective diameter of head (see [§ 241.4](/on/2024-09-16/title-15/section-241.4)) | 151/4 | 133/8 | 115/8 |
| Distance between heads | 231/2 | 201/2 | 18 |
| Circumference of bulge, outside measurement | 581/2 | 511/2 | 451/4 |
| **Subdivisions of Barrel for Cranberries** | | | |
| Effective diameter of head (see [§ 241.4](/on/2024-09-16/title-15/section-241.4)) | 143/8 | 125/8 | 11 |
| Distance between heads | 23 | 20 | 171/2 |
| Circumference of bulge, outside measurement | 533/8 | 47 | 413/8 |

(Sec. 1, 38 Stat. 1186; [15 U.S.C. 234](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/15/234))
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7302

FREDDIE TAYLOR,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GARY MILLER,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,

District Judge. (5:03-hc-00942-BO)

Submitted: January 24, 2008 Decided: February 14, 2008

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Freddie Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Freddie Taylor seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order

is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000).

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v.

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S.

473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Taylor

has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
(December 16, 1953.)

(Republish.)

#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Josef Lieber, Deceased. Joseph Handler, Appellant; Hedy Wegier, Respondent.

Orders unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Present — Callahan, J. P,, Breitel, Bastow, Botein and Bergan, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 1040.]
Product Certification in Russia - Important Contacts:

----