alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2022069EN.01012501.xml

| 4.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 69/125 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 69/125

---

DECISION No 73/2021 OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE ESTABLISHED UNDER THE AGREEMENT ON MUTUAL RECOGNITION BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

of 8 February 2022

related to the listing of Conformity Assessment Bodies under the Sectoral Annex for Electromagnetic Compatibility (2022/370)

THE JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on Mutual Recognition between the European Community and the United States of America and in particular Article 7 and 14;

Whereas the Joint Committee is to take a decision to list a Conformity Assessment Body or Bodies under a Sectoral Annex;

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

| 1. | The Conformity Assessment Bodies in Attachment A are added to the list of Conformity Assessment Bodies under column ‘EC access to the US market’ in Section V of the Sectoral Annex for Electromagnetic Compatibility. |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | The specific scopes of listing, in terms of products and conformity assessment procedures, of the Conformity Assessment Bodies indicated in Attachment A have been agreed by the Parties and will be maintained by them.
  This Decision, done in duplicate, shall be signed by representatives of the Joint Committee who are authorized to act on behalf of the Parties for purposes of amending the Agreement. This Decion shall be effective from the date of the later of these signatures. |
| --- | --- |

2.

This Decision, done in duplicate, shall be signed by representatives of the Joint Committee who are authorized to act on behalf of the Parties for purposes of amending the Agreement. This Decion shall be effective from the date of the later of these signatures.

On behalf of the United States of America

James C. SANFORD

Signed in Washington, on 2 February 2022

On behalf of the European Union

Lucian CERNAT

Signed in Brussels, on 8 February 2022

---

Attachment A

EC Conformity Assessment Bodies added to the list of Conformity Assessment Bodies under column ‘EC access to the US market’ in Section V of the Sectoral Annex for Electromagnetic Compatibility

| IBL-Lab GmbH |
| --- |
| Heinrich-Hertz-Allee 7 |
| 66386 St. Ingbert |
| GERMANY |

IBL-Lab GmbH

Heinrich-Hertz-Allee 7

66386 St. Ingbert

GERMANY

| C.R.E.I. Ven S.c.r.a.l. Centro Ricerca Elettronica Industriale del Veneto |
| --- |
| Corso Spagna 12, |
| 35127 Padova |
| ITALY |

C.R.E.I. Ven S.c.r.a.l. Centro Ricerca Elettronica Industriale del Veneto

Corso Spagna 12,

35127 Padova

ITALY

---
M~4 4

Ad 0

Briefing on Office of Nuclear

Regulatory Research

Performance and Plans

Dr. Carl J. Paperlello, Director

Aprl 5, 2005

Agenda

* Overview

* Programs Supported

* Other Work

* Codes

* Management

* Summary

2

Overview

* Technically Diverse

* Support Commission, Executive

Director for Operations (EDO), Office of Nuclear Reactor

Regulation (NRR), Office of

Nuclear Material Safety and

Safeguards (NMSS), and Office of

Nuclear Security and Incident

Response (NSIR)

* Extensive Collaboration

* Human Capital

Major NRR Support

Activities

* New Reactors

* Rulemaking - Technical Bases

* Fuel Performance

* Steam Generator Action Plan

* Probabilistic Risk Analysis and

Standardized Plant Analysis Risk

(SPAR) Model

* Grid Reliability

1
Major NRR Support

Activities, cont.

* Operating Experience and

Accident Sequence Precursor

(ASP)

* Davis-Besse Lessons Learned

* Regulatory Guide Revision

* Human Factors

* Computer Codes

* Licensing Support

5

Major NMSS Support

Activities

* Decommissioning

* Dry Cask Storage Probabilistic

Risk Assessment (PRA)

* Cask Burnup Credit

* Criticality Support

6

Major NMSS Support

Activities, cont.

* Licensing Support

* Regulatory Guide Revision

* Rulemaking - Technical Bases

* Package Performance Study

7

Major NSIR Support

* Security and Emergency

Preparedness

* Incident Response

* Commission Has Been Briefed

a

J
Al 11 Ii,

Other RES Assignments

* Abnormal Occurrence Report

* Generic Safety Issues

* Standards Executive

* Committee to Review Generic

Requirements (CRGR)

* Radiation Exposure Information

and Reporting System

* Risk Communication

Computer Codes

* Thermal-Hydraulic - Code

Assessment and Maintenance

Program (CAMP)

* Severe Accident - Cooperative

Severe Accident Research

Program (CSARP)

* Cooperative PRA (COOPRA)

Program

* Fuel Performance

* Fire Modeling

*0

Computer Codes, cont.

* Environmental

* Computational Fluid Dynamics

(CFD)

* Finite Element Analysis

* Spreadsheets and Mathematical

Codes

* Criticality

* Widely Distributed

II

International Activities

* Support Office of International

Programs (OIP)

* Code Support

* Availability of Facilities

* Effectiveness and Efficiency

12

3
Management

Accomplishments

* Improved Communications

* Significantly Revised Operating

Plan

* Integrated with Supported Offices

in Budget and Work Processes

* Revising Office Procedures

13

Challenges and Response

* Information Sources

* Business Processes

* Timeliness

* Realism

* Human Capital

14

Human Capital

* Management Succession

* Staff Succession

* Knowledge Management

i5

Knowledge Management

* Not Information Technology (IT)

* Extension of Existing Knowledge

Acquisition, Learning, Training, and Educational Activities

* Systematic Analysis of Knowledge

Needs

* Use IT as Needed

16

4 11 I /-
-' V

Summary

* Strengthening Agency Integration

* Quality Work

* Human Capital

17

5
#### § 846.102 Definitions.

In this part—

*CSRS* means subchapter III of chapter 83 of title 5, United States Code.

*CSRS/SS service* means service subject to both CSRS deductions (or deductions under another retirement system for Federal employees if such service is creditable under CSRS) and social security deductions as a result of the Social Security Amendments of 1983. For this purpose, the service of an individual is considered CSRS/SS service if the service would have been covered under CSRS except for an election under section 208(a)(1)(A) of the Federal Employees Retirement Contribution Temporary Adjustment Act of 1983 to have no CSRS coverage.

*Employee* means an employee as defined by § 842.102 of this chapter.

*Employing office* means the office of an agency to which jurisdiction and responsibility for retirement matters for an employee have been delegated.

*FERS* means the Federal Employees Retirement System as described in chapter 84 of title 5, United States Code.

*Former spouse* means a former spouse as defined in § 838.103 or § 838.1003 of this chapter.

*Member* means a Member of Congress as defined in section 2106 of title 5, United States Code.

*OPM* means the Office of Personnel Management.

*Qualifying court order* means a court order acceptable for processing as defined in § 838.103 of this chapter or a qualifying court order as defined in § 838.1003 of this chapter.

*Social security* means coverage under the Old Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance programs of the Social Security Act.

[52 FR 19235, May 21, 1987, as amended at 57 FR 33599, July 29, 1992]
OPENING REMARKS OF CHAIRMAN GREGORY B. JACZKO AT TODAY’S

BRIEFING ON REACTOR MATERIALS AGING MANAGEMENT ISSUES

Good morning. The Commission meets today to discuss very important safety issues 

related to the materials degradation and aging management for nuclear power plants. With the 

aging of the nation’s nuclear reactors, it is critical that licensees and the agency stay on top of 

these important issues. 

As the 62 approved license renewal applications to date demonstrate, the industry has 

done good work in developing effective aging management programs. It’s important, however, 

to resist a sense of complacency about these issues, especially as the industry explores the 

possibility of subsequent license renewal. The agency and its licensees have very limited 

experience in seeing how aging management programs actually work after the initial 40 year 

period of operation. In fact, it was less than two years ago that Oyster Creek became the first 

nuclear power plant to pass the forty year operational mark, and only eight units have entered 

extended operation at this point.

It’s important that we remain proactive in order to address unresolved issues, as well as to 

identify the questions we need to be asking in order to maintain safety in the future. I believe the 

NRC, the Department of Energy (DOE), and licensees have done a better job of identifying and 

analyzing these issues in recent years. The Commission looks forward to hearing from the staff, 

as well as representatives from the DOE and the industry, on recent progress and future research 

plans. 

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-032 March 1, 2011
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
Chief Executive Officer Certification I, John M. Monter, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Brand Intermediate
Holdings, Inc; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;(b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report on
such evaluation; and(c)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Registrants internal control over financial reporting. 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and Page -32-




---



##### 



(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal controls over financial reporting; Date: August 16, 2004
    /s/ John M. MonterJohn M. MonterChief Executive Officer, President Page -33-
§ 255.2 Qualifications. Each applicant selected for a fellowship shall be: ( a ) A citizen of an American republic other than the United States;
( b ) In possession of a certificate of medical examination issued by a licensed physician within 60 days of the date of application, describing the applicant's physical condition and stating that he is free from any communicable disease, physical deformity or disability that would interfere with the proper pursuit of training, research, or any other activity or work incident to the fellowship;
( c ) Able to speak, read, write and understand the English language;
( d ) Of good moral character and possessing intellectual ability and suitable personal qualities; and
( e ) In possession of acceptable evidence that he has successfully completed the equivalent of a four-year university course in a recognized university, college or other institution of learning, with some training or experience in the field of activity which he desires to pursue. Equivalent experience may be substituted for the university training in the case of candidates who are otherwise specially well qualified.
# L_2016155EN.01000101.xml

| 14.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 155/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 155/1

---

Information relating to the date of the entry into force of the Cooperation Agreement on Satellite Navigation between the European Union and its Member States and the Kingdom of Norway

The Cooperation Agreement on Satellite Navigation between the European Union and its Member States and the Kingdom of Norway, signed in Brussels on 22 September 2010, entered into force on 1 April 2016, in accordance with Article 12(1) of the Agreement, as the last notification was deposited on 4 March 2016.

---
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 20 (Wednesday, January 30, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 479]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00233]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Brain Disorders and Clinical Neuroscience 
Integrated Review Group; Brain Injury and Neurovascular Pathologies 
Study Section.
    Date: February 11-12, 2019.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications
    Place: Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military 
Road NW, Washington, DC 20015.
    Contact Person: Alexander Yakovlev, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5206, MSC 7846, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-435-1254, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#067f676d69706a6370674665757428686f6e28616970"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9ee7fff5f1e8f2fbe8ffdefdedecb0f0f7f6b0f9f1e8">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in 
advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of 
2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 22, 2019.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-00233 Filed 1-29-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. II-11-001 January 4, 2010 

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416 

VICTOR MCCREE NAMED ADMINISTRATOR OF 

NRC’S REGION II OFFICE

The U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has named Victor M. McCree as the new 

administrator of its Region II office in Atlanta. McCree officially assumes the role of regional 

administrator Jan. 16, succeeding Luis A. Reyes, who plans to retire at the end of February. 

As regional administrator, McCree will oversee a staff of more 

than 300 employees. Region II is responsible for regulating 33 commercial 

nuclear power plants in seven southeastern states, as well as all NRCregulated nuclear fuel cycle facilities in the U.S. In addition, Region II is 

responsible for implementing the construction inspection program at all 

new nuclear power plants and fuel cycle facilities in the nation. 

“Victor McCree is exceptionally well qualified to lead Region II in 

carrying out our mission of protecting people and the environment," said 

Bill Borchardt, the NRC’s executive director for operations. “He has held 

positions of increasing responsibility and continues to successfully meet the challenges before him. 

His tenure in Region II will mean a seamless transition and continues our strong oversight of 

operating and new construction facilities." 

McCree joined the NRC in 1988 as an inspector in the Office of Nuclear Reactor 

Regulation. He held progressively more responsible positions in NRR and later in the offices of the 

Executive Director for Operations and former NRC Chairman Shirley Ann Jackson. 

Assigned to Region II in 1998, McCree served as the deputy director and director for both 

the Divisions of Reactor Safety and Reactor Projects. He became the deputy regional administrator 

for operations in 2006. 

McCree, a native of Jackson, Miss., graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy in 1981 and 

holds an Executive Master of Business Administration degree from Georgia State University. Prior 

to joining the NRC, he was a nuclear-qualified submarine officer in the U.S. Navy. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

245 Peachtree Center Ave. NE, Suite 1200 

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20 22

- 0 571

_____________________________
J ESSIE C LYDE K ELLEY , J R

. , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County

. Christopher N. Patterson , Judge

. December 12, 2023

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. B.L. T HOMAS , W INOKUR , and L ONG , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.29

                                PEOPLESOFT, INC.

               DESCRIPTION OF BONUS AND RETENTION ARRANGEMENTS FOR
                               EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

                                JANUARY 13, 2004

Bonus Arrangements

         The bonus arrangements for the Chief Executive Officer are set forth in
his employment agreement. Executives other than the CEO are eligible to receive
quarterly bonuses under a broad-based employee bonus plan. The maximum target
cash incentive compensation for each executive officer is approved by the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors and is determined based on
PeopleSoft's overall performance; the executive's contributions to corporate
goals; changes in the executive's scope of responsibilities; published pay data
for comparable positions in the industry; and internal compensation equity
considerations.

         The quarterly bonus payout for each executive is based on a combination
of Company performance and the achievement of individual goals and objectives.
Company performance factors include achievement of revenue and operating income
targets and attainment of customer satisfaction objectives; individual
objectives or goals may include business unit revenue, margin, operating goals
and objectives and management of operating expenses.

         At the end of each year, the Compensation Committee reviews the overall
performance of each executive and the role the executive played in PeopleSoft's
overall performance. Based on exceptional Company and individual performance,
the Compensation Committee may award a discretionary cash bonus, paid in
addition to the quarterly bonuses.

Retention Arrangements

         The Chief Executive Officer and two other executive officers also have
retention bonus arrangements approved by the Compensation Committee that contain
acceleration of service provisions if their employment is terminated without
cause or in connection with a change of control of PeopleSoft.
### §3736. Reporting requirements

The annual report required by section 529 of this title shall include a discussion of the activities under this chapter. Beginning with the report submitted at the close of fiscal year 1996, and every second year thereafter, this discussion shall include information regarding the following:

(1) Loans made to veterans whose only qualifying service was in the Selected Reserve.

(2) Interest rates and discount points which were negotiated between the lender and the veteran pursuant to section 3703(c)(4)(A)(i) of this title.

(3) The determination of reasonable value by lenders pursuant to section 3731(f) of this title.

(4) Loans that include funds for energy efficiency improvements pursuant to section 3710(a)(10) of this title.

(5) Direct loans to Native American veterans made pursuant to subchapter V of this chapter.

(Added Pub. L. 104–110, title II, §201(a)(1), Feb. 13, 1996, 110 Stat. 770.)