alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
LEONA COSBY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) V. ) ) PEOPLE'S CANCEL OF THE COURT, ) ) Defendant. ) Civil Action No.



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 

# FILED JUN- 72012 Clerk, U.S. District &B Courts for the Oist
. ankruptcy net ot Columbia 

# 12 0926

This matter comes before the court onreview ofthe plaintiffs application to proceed in formapauperis andpro se civil complaint. The court will grant the application, and dismiss the complaint. The Courthas reviewed the plaintiffs complaint, keeping in mind that complaints filed by pro se litigants are held to less stringent standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Evenprose litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules ofCivil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) ofthe Federal Rules ofCivil Procedure requires that a complaint contain a short and plain statement ofthe grounds upon which the court'sjurisdiction depends, a short and plain statement ofthe claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand forjudgmentfor the reliefthe pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The purpose ofthe minimum standard ofRule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendant ofthe claim being asserted, sufficient to prepare aresponsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense andto determine whetherthe doctrine ofresjudicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497,498 (D.D.C. 1977). 

### 1In its entirety, the complaint states: The people in this area have been doing things to me that are not good standard hitting me in the face and head, taking things from me, money, clothes, [harassing]justabout evennight. Iwasunable to go in to there [sic] stores with my cart. I was told not to come back in the store. Some is in the room behind the bathroom taking picture wild [sic] using the bathroom. I was also cut mybody. Compl. Plaintiffdemands "one Trillion" dollars. 

### !d. What few factual allegations the plaintiff includes in herpleading are far too vague to establish an entitlementto the monetary damages she demands. As drafted, the complaint fails to comply with Rule 8(a), and it will be dismissed. An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.

United States DistrictJudge DATE:

2
NRC MEETING MARCH 31 IN ROCKVILLE, MD, TO DISCUSS DRAFT RULE ON 

NEW REACTOR CONSTRUCTION SITE SECURITY 

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will conduct a public meeting at the agency 

headquarters in Rockville, Md., on Wednesday, March 31, to discuss proposed language for a 

rule that would set requirements for access authorization and physical security at new reactor 

construction sites. 

 The NRC will hold the meeting in Room T8A1 of the agency’s Two White Flint North 

building, 11545 Rockville Pike in Rockville, from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. NRC staff will provide 

background on the topic, an overview of the proposed rule before the meeting is opened to 

discussion and several question/answer periods. The staff will outline a schedule for finalizing 

the proposed rule language later in the meeting. Members of the public interested in participating 

via teleconference should contact Fred Schofer at 301-415-5682. 

The draft rule language is available by going to http://www.regulations.gov and entering 

Docket IDs NRC-2009-0195, or through the NRC’s electronic documents database, ADAMS, by 

entering “ML100750461” in the ADAMS search engine at 

http://adamswebsearch.nrc.gov/dologin.htm. 

### 

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand. 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-049 March 19, 2010
NRC MEETS PERFORMANCE GOALS;

ISSUES FY 2011 PERFORMANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued its Performance and Accountability

Report (PAR) for Fiscal Year 2011, demonstrating the agency’s effectiveness and efficiency in

achieving its mission to protect public health and safety and the environment. The NRC 

successfully met its two strategic safety and security goals and met all of its safety performance 

measure targets and all but one of its security performance measure targets for regulating the 

nuclear industry. The NRC PAR describes the agency’s program and financial performance from 

Oct. 1, 2010, through Sept. 30, 2011.

“I am proud of the performance of NRC employees in achieving the agency’s safety and 

security goals while continuing to prudently manage the resources entrusted to us by the 

American people,” said Chairman Gregory B. Jaczko.

The NRC continued to maintain effective and efficient oversight of the nation’s

104 nuclear power reactors that continue to operate safely, meeting all six of the agency’s

performance measures in the safety arena. The agency also remained focused on the safe and 

secure use of nuclear materials through effective oversight of fuel facilities, uranium recovery 

sites, decommissioning sites and nuclear material users. The NRC’s activities were a significant 

factor in preventing the occurrence of nuclear reactor accidents, inadvertent criticality events, 

acute radiation exposures resulting in fatalities, releases of radioactive materials resulting in 

significant radiation exposures, and releases of radioactive materials that cause significant 

adverse environmental effects. 

The NRC met its objectives despite the additional challenges of responding to the 

Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear accident in Japan, the Midwest floods, the Virginia earthquake and 

Hurricane Irene, as well as the intense Congressional and public attention these events focused 

on nuclear safety issues.

In the security arena, NRC’s activities were instrumental in preventing any domestic use 

of radioactive materials in a manner hostile to the security of the United States. The NRC met its 

security goal, and achieved all but one of its five performance measure targets. There was one

unrecovered loss or theft of a risk-significant radioactive source (a stolen radiography camera), 

which exceeded the target of zero.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-213 November 16, 2011
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission FY 2011 Performance and Accountability Report

can be found on the NRC’s website.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.
B.C.D. 00-51

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION NOV 1 7 2000

Naugatuck Railroad Company

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning the

status of Naugatuck Railroad Company (NRC) as an employer under the

Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231 et sea.) and the Railroad

Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. § 351 et sea.).

Information regarding NRC was provided by John R. Gamm, counsel to NRC.

According to Mr. Gamm, NRC began doing business on December 29, 1995.

NRC reports that it currently has one employee; and that its rail crews are

volunteers from the Railroad Museum of New England, Inc.

In Surface Transportation Board Finance Docket No. 32793, NRC filed a notice

of exemption to acquire and operate approximately 19.6 miles of rail line owned

by the State of Connecticut and to become a shortline rail carrier. Most of

NRC’s operations are as an excursion railroad. However, it also interchanges

with the Springfield Terminal Railway Company, an employer under the Acts

(B.A. No. 2112), in order to transport a tank car for one customer on the line, DA Lubricants, which owns the car. NRC’s excursion operation, during the

tourist season, operates 240 to 258 miles per week. Its freight operation

averages less than four miles per month. NRC also connects with Metro North

Commuter Railroad Company, an employer under the Acts (B.A. No. 9351) for

the purposes of moving NRC’s equipment to and from repair facilities and

occasionally running an excursion train on Metro North track. On one occasion

Metro North ran an excursion railroad on NRC’s track.

Although NRC’s operation is chiefly that of an excursion railroad, the evidence

of record nevertheless establishes that NRC is a carrier operating in interstate

commerce. Accordingly, it is determined that NRC is an employer within the

meaning ofsection l(a)(l)(i) of the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C.

§ 23l(a)(l)(i)) and the corresponding provision of the Railroad Unemployment

Insurance Act as of December 29, 1995, the date as ofwhich it commenced

operations.

CherryThomas

V. M. Speakman, Jr.

BA#2132
§ 890.1305 Termination and cancellation. ( a ) If an enrolled eligible beneficiary moves out of a demonstration area, the enrollment of the eligible beneficiary and all family members will be terminated. If an enrolled eligible beneficiary moves to an area located within a demonstration area, he or she will continue to be eligible to participate in the demonstration project. If the eligible beneficiary was enrolled prior to the move in an HMO that does not serve the new demonstration area, the eligible beneficiary will have an opportunity to select a new health plan offered by a carrier participating in the demonstration project in the new area. If the eligible beneficiary was enrolled in a fee-for-service plan prior to the move and moves to another area that is within an existing demonstration area, the eligible beneficiary can maintain his or her current coverage.
( b ) If an enrolled eligible beneficiary disenrolls, cancels, or terminates enrollment for any reason, he or she will not be eligible to reenroll in the demonstration project. Once coverage ends, eligible beneficiaries and all family members have the right to resume all of the benefits to which they are entitled to under title 10 of the United States Code. Medicare-covered eligible beneficiaries and their eligible family members who had Medigap policies prior to their enrollment in the demonstration project are entitled to reinstate that coverage under the conditions stated in section 1108(l) of title 10, United States Code.
( c ) Eligible beneficiaries and their family members are eligible for Temporary Continuation of Coverage (TCC) under the conditions and for the durations described in subpart K or until the end of the demonstration project, whichever occurs first. The effective date of TCC for eligible beneficiaries or their eligible family members will be the day after other coverage under this subpart ends. Eligible beneficiaries or their eligible family members selecting TCC must enroll in a health plan offered by a carrier participating in the demonstration project. If an eligible beneficiary or eligible family member enrolled in DoD TCC moves from a demonstration project area, coverage ends. DoD TCC enrollees will be responsible for paying the entire DoD premium rate (OPM's approved net-to-carrier DoD rate plus 4 percent for contingency and administration reserves) plus 2 percent of this premium rate for administration of the program. DoD will make arrangements to collect premiums plus the 2 percent administrative charge from eligible beneficiaries and forward them to OPM's Employees Health Benefits Fund. OPM will establish procedures for receiving the 2 percent administrative payment into the Employees Health Benefits Fund and making this amount available to DoD for administration of the program.
( d ) Enrolled eligible beneficiaries are not eligible for the temporary extension of coverage and conversion opportunities described in subpart D of this part.
§ 630.1603 Authorization. Subject to other provisions of this subpart, an agency may grant weather and safety leave to employees only if they are prevented from safely traveling to or safely performing work at a location approved by the agency due to— ( a ) An act of God;
( b ) A terrorist attack; or
( c ) Another condition that prevents an employee or group of employees from safely traveling to or safely performing work at an approved location.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2338

To prevent loans for Iraq from the International Monetary Fund or the 

International Bank for Reconstruction and Development from being used 

to pay off Iraq’s creditors. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 4, 2003

Mr. SAXTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL

To prevent loans for Iraq from the International Monetary 

Fund or the International Bank for Reconstruction and 

Development from being used to pay off Iraq’s creditors.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PREVENTION OF LOANS FROM IRAQ FROM THE 

4 INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND OR THE 

5 INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUC6 TION AND DEVELOPMENT FROM BEING USED 

7 TO PAY OFF IRAQ’S CREDITORS. 

8 The Bretton Woods Agreements Act (22 U.S.C. 286–

9 286oo) is amended by adding at the end the following: 
2

•HR 2338 IH 

1 ‘‘SEC. 64. PREVENTION OF INTERNATIONAL MONETARY 

2 FUND LOANS FOR IRAQ FROM BEING USED 

3 TO PAY OFF IRAQ’S CREDITORS. 

4 ‘‘The Secretary of the Treasury shall instruct the 

5 United States Executive Director at the Fund and at the 

6 Bank to use the voice, vote, and influence of the United 

7 States to oppose the making of a loan by the Fund or 

8 the Bank, respectively, to the government of Iraq unless 

9 the Secretary of the Treasury determines that there are 

10 sufficient safeguards in place to prevent the loan proceeds 

11 from being used to reimburse persons or governments 

12 holding debt arising from credit extended to the govern13 ment of Iraq, and outstanding as of the date of the enact14 ment of this section, for any losses with respect to the 

15 debt.’’.

Æ
§ 719.18 Decisions. ( a ) *Initial decision.* After considering the entire record in the case, the ALJ will issue an initial decision based on a preponderance of the evidence. The decision will include findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a decision based thereon as to whether the respondent has violated the Act. If the ALJ finds that the evidence of record is insufficient to sustain a finding that a violation has occurred with respect to one or more allegations, the ALJ shall order dismissal of the allegation(s) in whole or in part, as appropriate. If the ALJ finds that one or more violations have been committed, the ALJ shall issue an order imposing administrative sanctions.
( b ) *Factors considered in assessing penalties.* In determining the amount of a civil penalty, the ALJ shall take into account the nature, circumstances, extent and gravity of the violation(s), and, with respect to the respondent, the respondent's ability to pay the penalty, the effect of a civil penalty on the respondent's ability to continue to do business, the respondent's history of prior violations, the respondent's degree of culpability, the existence of an internal compliance program, and such other matters as justice may require.
( c ) *Certification of initial decision.* The ALJ shall immediately certify the initial decision and order to the Executive Director of the Office of Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State, 2201 C Street, NW., Room 5519, Washington, DC 20520, to the Office of Chief Counsel at the address in § 719.8, and to the respondent, by personal delivery or overnight mail.
( d ) *Review of initial decision.* The initial decision shall become the final agency decision and order unless, within 30 days, the Secretary of State modifies or vacates it, with or without conditions, in accordance with 22 CFR 103.8.
#### In the Matter of Allite Fund, Inc., a Proposed Membership Corporation, Respondent, against Michael F. Walsh, as Secretary of State of the State of New York, Appellant.

All concur.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 248 (Friday, December 28, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 67278]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-28255]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL19-24-000]


Exelon Generation Company, LLC; Notice of Institution of Section 
206 Proceeding and Refund Effective Date

    On December 20, 2018, the Commission issued an order in Docket No. 
EL19-24-000, pursuant to section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 
U.S.C. 824e (2012), instituting an investigation into the continued 
justness and reasonableness of Exelon Generation Company, LLC's rate 
for providing Reactive Supply and Voltage Control Service. Exelon 
Generation Company, LLC, 165 FERC 61,245 (2018).
    The refund effective date in Docket No. EL19-24-000, established 
pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA, will be the date of publication 
of this notice in the Federal Register.
    Any interested person desiring to be heard in Docket No. EL19-24-
000 must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as 
appropriate, with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rule 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.214, within 21 
days of the date of issuance of the order.

    Dated: December 20, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-28255 Filed 12-27-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
**Exhibit
31.1** **Section
302 Certification**
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 I,
Richard L. Bready, certify that:
  1.
    I
      have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Nortek,
      Inc.;
 
 2.
    Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;
 
 3.
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
      report;
 
 4.
    
    The
      registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have:
 
 (a)
    Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;
 
 (b)
    Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
      covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 
 (c)
    Disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent
      fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting; and
 
 5.
    The
      registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
      our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
      to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s
      board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
      functions):
 
 (a)
    All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 
 (b)
    Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control
      over financial reporting.
 
 
 Date: May
10, 2005
 
 
 /s/
Richard L.
Bready
 Name:  Richard
L. Bready
 Title:  President
and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.3




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Anthony J. Branca, Chief Financial Officer of ICON Capital Corp., the Manager of the Registrant, in connection with the Quarterly Report of ICON Income Fund Ten, LLC (the “LLC”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 
 1.
The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2.
The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the LLC.
 
 
 Date: May 12, 2011


/s/Anthony J. Branca__


Anthony J. Branca


Chief Financial Officer


ICON Capital Corp.


Manager of ICON Income Fund Ten, LLC
#### Abraham Moliver, as Administrator of the Estate of Isidore Moliver, Deceased, Appellant, v. Samuel Knebel, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-12-0042 - Colorado Alternative Standards; Implementation of the Alternative Standards Provision in Section 274o of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, As Amended

Accession Number: ML120330024

Date Released: Tuesday, April 3, 2012

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML120330026 - SECY-12-0042 - Colorado Alternative Standards; Implementation of the Alternative Standards Provision in Section 274o of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as Amended (4 page(s), 3/19/2012)
    - ML120330021 - SECY-12-0042 - Enclosure 1 - Public Comment and NRC Response: Proposed Alternative Standard for the Uravan Site (5 page(s), 3/19/2012)
    - ML12059A448 - SECY-12-0042 - Enclosure 2 - Attachment 1 Uravan Land Status Map with Proposed Land Transfer Boundaries (1 page(s), 3/19/2012)
    - ML120330018 - SECY-12-0042 - Enclosure 2 -  Staff Analysis of Proposed Colorado Alternative Soil Standards for the Uravan, Colorado Uranium Mill Site (10 page(s), 3/19/2012)
    - ML120330023 - SECY-12-0042 - Enclosure 3 - Federal Register Notice Final Alternative Soil Standards for Uravan Colorado Uranium Mill (5 page(s), 3/19/2012)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer