alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BISNIS Trades & Tenders, August 24, 1998 - Part 2

----

INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT, U.S. & FOREIGN COMMERCIAL SERVICE AND U.S.DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 1997.  ALL RIGHTS RESERVED OUTSIDE OF THE UNITEDSTATES.
THE BUSINESS INFORMATION SERVICE FOR THE NEWLY INDEPENDENT STATES (BISNIS) ISTHE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE'S INFORMATION CLEARINGHOUSE ON TRADE ANDINVESTMENT IN THE EMERGING MARKETS OF THE NEWLY INDEPENDENT STATES OF THEFORMER SOVIET UNION.  BISNIS HAS CREATED THE BISNIS TRADES AND TENDERSELECTRONIC NEWSLETTER TO HELP U.S. COMPANIES FIND BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES INTHESE EXPANDING MARKETS.
THESE OPPORTUNITIES ARE PROVIDED SOLELY AS AN INFORMATIONAL SERVICE AND DONOT REPRESENT AN ENDORSEMENT BY THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE.VERIFICATION OF LEADS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE READER. BISNIS MAY CONSIDEROTHER PRIVATE SECTOR-GENERATED TRADE LEADS AND TENDERS, IN ELECTRONIC FORMONLY, AND PUBLISH ON A SPACE-AVAILABLE BASIS. PLEASE SEND YOUR LEADS TO[email protected]
#### Rose Cole, Respondent-Appellant, v. Mary Jaeger, Appellant-Respondent.

Cross appeals from a judgment decreeing plaintiff to be the owner of two mortgages held in the name of defendant, her daughter; dismissing causes of action for an adjudication that houses held in the name of defendant belong to plaintiff, and dismissing a counterclaim wherein defendant sought a money judgment as to sums withdrawn by plaintiff from savings bank accounts jointly in the names of the parties. Judgment, insofar as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston) Adel and Sneed, JJ. [See *post,*p. 1008.]
§ 2004.26 Are there any exemptions from the Privacy Act? ( a ) *What is a Privacy Act exemption?* The Privacy Act authorizes USTR to exempt records or information in a system of records from some of the Privacy Act requirements, if we determine that the exemption is necessary. With the exception of certain law enforcement records, we will not provide you with an accounting of disclosures or make available to you records that are exempt.
( b ) *How do I know if the records or information I want are exempt?* Each USTR system of records notice will advise you if we have determined that records or information in records are exempt from Privacy Act requirements. If we have claimed an exemption for a system of records, the system of records notice will identify the exemption and the provisions of the Privacy Act from which the system is exempt.
### §371. Relationship to other incentives and pays

(a) Treatment.—A bonus or incentive pay paid to a member of the uniformed services under subchapter II is in addition to any other pay and allowance to which a member is entitled, unless otherwise provided under this chapter.

(b) Exception.—A member may not receive a bonus or incentive pay under both subchapter I and subchapter II for the same activity, skill, or period of service.

(c) Relationship to Other Computations.—The amount of a bonus or incentive pay to which a member is entitled under subchapter II may not be included in computing the amount of—

(1) any increase in pay authorized by any other provision of this title; or

(2) any retired pay, retainer pay, separation pay, or disability severance pay.

(Added Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title VI, §661(a)(2), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 176.)
In the

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-24-00011-CR

EX PARTE LUIS GUSTAVO VENTURA GIL

On Appeal from the County Court

Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12027CR

Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Rambin
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This Court previously reversed the trial court’s denial of Appellant’s pretrial writ of 

habeas corpus and remanded the matter to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing.1 Ex parte 

Gil, No. 06-23-00215-CR, 2023 WL 8287590 (Tex. App.—Texarkana Dec. 1, 2023, pet. filed) 

(mem. op., not designated for publication). Before the issuance of our mandate, and while the 

State’s petition for discretionary review was pending before the Texas Court of Criminal 

Appeals, the trial court, on January 9, 2024, issued another denial of Appellant’s pretrial writ of 

habeas corpus, which is the subject of this appeal.

Recognizing that the trial court’s action prior to the issuance of our mandate was a 

nullity, TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(g) (“Once the record has been filed in the appellate court, all further 

proceedings in the trial court—except as provided otherwise by law or by these rules—will be 

suspended until the trial court receives the appellate-court mandate.”), the State filed a motion to 

dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. We requested that appellant file a response to the 

State’s motion. In that response, appellant conceded that the trial court’s January 9, 2024, order 

is void and that this appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

1Originally appealed to the Fourth Court of Appeals, this case was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme 

Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (Supp.).
3

In light of the foregoing, we vacate the trial court’s denial of Appellant’s pretrial writ of 

habeas corpus issued on January 9, 2024, grant the State’s motion to dismiss the appeal, and 

dismiss this appeal.

Jeff Rambin

Justice

Date Submitted: March 21, 2024

Date Decided: March 22, 2024

Do Not Publish
§ 700.53 Criteria for assistance. Requests for special priorities assistance should be timely, *i.e.,* the request has been submitted promptly and enough time exists for the Determination Department, Delegate Agency, or the Department of Commerce to effect a meaningful resolution to the problem, and must establish that: ( a ) There is an urgent need for the item; and
( b ) The applicant has made a reasonable effort to resolve the problem.
[49 FR 30414, July 30, 1984. Redesignated at 54 FR 601, Jan. 9, 1989, as amended at 79 FR 47568, Aug. 14, 2014; 89 FR 58974, July 22, 2024]
NRC BEGINS SPECIAL INSPECTION AT OCONEE NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has dispatched a special inspection team to the 

Oconee nuclear power plant to evaluate an issue related to the plant’s standby shutdown facility, 

which is intended for use when regular and emergency reactor cooling systems are not available.

The Oconee plant, operated by Duke Energy, is located near Seneca, S.C., about 30 miles

west of Greenville.

On June 24, Oconee plant employees determined that testing on the standby shutdown 

facility pressurizer heater breakers was not successful and the breakers were declared operable 

but degraded. 

The standby shutdown facility is designed to be used for reactor cooling during certain 

accident scenarios, including fires and severe storms where other cooling systems might be

unavailable or inoperable.

The NRC’s special inspection team will determine the facts surrounding the degraded

condition of the Oconee standby shutdown facility and evaluate Duke Energy’s response to that 

condition. The team will also assess Duke’s revised operating procedures related to the facility as 

well as operators’ training and capabilities to implement those procedures.

The special inspection began Tuesday and is expected to continue for about one week. 

The NRC will issue a report within 45 days of the completion of the inspection.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No: II-11-042

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416 

 July 6, 2011

E-mail: OPA2.Resource@nrc.gov
### §4326. Conduct of investigation; subpoenas

(a) In carrying out any investigation under this chapter, the Secretary's duly authorized representatives shall, at all reasonable times, have reasonable access to and the right to interview persons with information relevant to the investigation and shall have reasonable access to, for purposes of examination, and the right to copy and receive, any documents of any person or employer that the Secretary considers relevant to the investigation.

(b) In carrying out any investigation under this chapter, the Secretary may require by subpoena the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of documents relating to any matter under investigation. In case of disobedience of the subpoena or contumacy and on request of the Secretary, the Attorney General may apply to any district court of the United States in whose jurisdiction such disobedience or contumacy occurs for an order enforcing the subpoena.

(c) Upon application, the district courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction to issue writs commanding any person or employer to comply with the subpoena of the Secretary or to comply with any order of the Secretary made pursuant to a lawful investigation under this chapter and the district courts shall have jurisdiction to punish failure to obey a subpoena or other lawful order of the Secretary as a contempt of court.

(d) Subsections (b) and (c) shall not apply to the legislative branch or the judicial branch of the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 103–353, §2(a), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3167; amended Pub. L. 104–275, title III, §311(13), Oct. 9, 1996, 110 Stat. 3336.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–275 inserted "have reasonable access to and the right to interview persons with information relevant to the investigation and shall" after "at all reasonable times,".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1996 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 104–275 effective Oct. 13, 1994, see section 313 of Pub. L. 104–275, set out as a note under section 4301 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 13, 1994, and applicable to any matter pending with Secretary of Labor under former section 4305 of this title as of that date, see section 8(e) of Pub. L. 103–353, set out as a note under section 4301 of this title.
EX-10.3.4



 




EXHIBIT
10.3.4




AMENDMENT TO THE

CHEK, INC.

2000 STOCK PLAN




          The Chek, Inc. 2000 Stock Plan (the “Plan”) was adopted on December 5, 2000. Unless
otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms shall have the meaning set forth in the Plan.




          Section 3 of the Plan shall be amended in its entirety to read as follows:




          “3. Stock Subject to the Plan. Subject to the provisions of Section 14 of the Plan,
the maximum aggregate number of Shares that may be sold under the Plan is 3,075,185 Shares of
Common Stock. The Shares may be authorized, but unissued, or reacquired Common Stock. If an award
should expire or become unexercisable for any reason without having been exercised in full, or is
surrendered pursuant to an Option Exchange Program, the unpurchased Shares that were subject
thereto shall, unless the Plan shall have been terminated, become available for future grant under
the Plan. In addition, any Shares of Common Stock which are retained by the Company upon exercise
of an award in order to satisfy the exercise or purchase price for such award or any withholding
taxes due with respect to such exercise or purchase shall be treated as not issued and shall
continue to be available under the Plan. Shares issued under the Plan and later repurchased by the
Company pursuant to any repurchase right which the Company may have shall not be available for
future grant under the Plan.”




	 	 	 	 	 
	Adopted by the Company’s Board of Directors:

	 	October 17, 2006
	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Adopted by the Company’s Stockholders:

	 	October 19, 2006
rtsp://real.clu-in.org/ert/crv.rm<!--rtsp://real.clu-in.org/unavailable.smil-->
#### § 30.38 Exemption from the requirements for reporting complete commodity information.

Except as noted in § 30.2(a)(1)(iv), report EEI for household goods. Household goods are usual and reasonable kinds and quantities of personal property necessary and appropriate for use by the USPPI in the USPPI's dwelling in a foreign country. Household goods include, but are not limited to items such as furniture, large and small appliances, kitchenware, electronics, toys, bicycles, clothing, personal adornments, and associated containers. These goods should be for use by the USPPI, not intended for sale; and shipped under a bill of lading or an air waybill. In such cases, Schedule B or HTSUSA commodity classification codes and domestic/foreign indicator shall not be required.

[78 FR 16381, Mar. 14, 2013]
### §4334. Notice of rights and duties

(a) Requirement To Provide Notice.—Each employer shall provide to persons entitled to rights and benefits under this chapter a notice of the rights, benefits, and obligations of such persons and such employers under this chapter. The requirement for the provision of notice under this section may be met by the posting of the notice where employers customarily place notices for employees.

(b) Content of Notice.—The Secretary shall provide to employers the text of the notice to be provided under this section.

(Added Pub. L. 108–454, title II, §203(a), Dec. 10, 2004, 118 Stat. 3606.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 4334 was renumbered section 7634 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 108–454, title II, §203(c), Dec. 10, 2004, 118 Stat. 3606, provided that:

"(1) Not later than the date that is 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 10, 2004], the Secretary of Labor shall make available to employers the notice required under section 4334 of title 38, United States Code, as added by subsection (a).

"(2) The amendments made by this section [enacting this section] shall apply to employers under chapter 43 of title 38, United States Code, on and after the first date referred to in paragraph (1)."
1 The Honorable H. David Young, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 02-1737

___________ Ronald Mitchell, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Sgt. Kirk, Pulaski County Regional * Eastern District of Arkansas. Detention Facility; Sgt. M. Yates, * [UNPUBLISHED] Pulaski County Regional Detention * Facility; Gerald Bennett, Deputy, * Pulaski County Regional Detention * Facility, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: September 4, 2002 Filed: September 10, 2002

___________ Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Ronald Mitchell appeals the district court’s 1 order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action with prejudice upon Mitchell’s refusal to participate in his trial.-2- Although Mitchell was displeased with the district court’s pretrial rulings to exclude certain witnesses and documentary evidence, we find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s refusal to grant Mitchell’s pro se request, on which his counsel did not comment, for a continuance. See Rydder v. Rydder , 49 F.3d 369, 373 (8th Cir. 1995) (standard of review). Given the denial of Mitchell’s request for a continuance and his refusal to participate at trial, we conclude the district court was left with little choice and did not abuse its discretion in following through with its admonishment that Mitchell’s refusal to participate would result in the dismissal of his case. See Rodgers v. Curators of Univ. of Mo. , 135 F.3d 1216, 1219 (8th Cir. 1998) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JAMES ALEXANDER JONES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-1355

[May 14, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; Robert E. Belanger, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2018CF002794A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and David John McPherrin, 

Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Picard, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, CIKLIN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 11441 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

DAVID WAYNE HOLT

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:14

- CR

- 367

- 56

Before KING, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent David Wayne Holt has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California

, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Holt h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED
October 24 , 2017

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-11441 Document: 00514207569 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/24/2017No. 16

- 11441

2 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused f rom further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-11441 Document: 00514207569 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/24/2017
Editorial Note on Part 400
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 400 appear at 78 FR 69289, Nov. 19, 2013.

§ 400.15 Production equipment. ( a ) *In general.* Pursuant to section 81c(e) of the FTZ Act, merchandise that is admitted into a foreign-trade zone for use within such zone as production equipment or as parts for such equipment, shall not be subject to duty until such merchandise is completely assembled, installed, tested, and used in the production for which it was admitted. Payment of duty may be deferred until such equipment goes into use as production equipment as part of zone production activity, at which time the equipment shall be entered for consumption as completed equipment.
( b ) *Definition of production equipment.* Eligibility for this section is limited to equipment and parts of equipment destined for use in zone production activity as defined in § 400.2(o) of this part. Ineligible for treatment as production equipment under this section are general materials (that are used in the installation of production equipment or in the assembly of equipment) and materials used in the construction or modification of the plant that houses the production equipment.
( c ) *Equipment not destined for zone activity.* Production equipment or parts that are not destined for use in zone production activity shall be treated as normal merchandise eligible for standard zone-related benefits (*i.e.,* benefits not subject to the requirements of § 400.14(a)), provided the equipment is entered for consumption or exported prior to its use.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William F. Hartley, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Present— Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
### §6501. Definition

In this chapter, the term "Chief Justice" means the Chief Justice of the United States or the designee of the Chief Justice, except that when there is a vacancy in the office of the Chief Justice, the most senior associate justice of the Supreme Court shall be deemed to be the Chief Justice for purposes of this chapter until the vacancy is filled.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1188.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6501 | 40:1208. | Pub. L. 100–480, §10, Oct. 7, 1988, 102 Stat. 2335. |

Section

The text of 40:1208(1) and (3) is omitted as unnecessary because the complete names of the Architect of the Capitol and the Commission for the Judiciary Office Building are used the first times the terms appear in a section.
```

[108th Congress Public Law 12]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ012.108]

[[Page 117 STAT. 612]]

Public Law 108-12
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of construction of 
   a hydroelectric project in the State of Illinois. <<NOTE: Apr. 22, 
                          2003 -  [H.R. 397]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 
            PROJECT.

     Notwithstanding the time period specified in section 13 of the 
Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project numbered 11214, the 
Commission may, at the request of the licensee for the project, and 
after reasonable notice, in accordance with the good faith, due 
diligence, and public interest requirements of that section and the 
Commission's procedures under that section--
            (1) reinstate the license for the construction of the 
        project as of the effective date of the surrender of the 
        license; and
            (2) extend the time period during which the licensee is 
        required to commence the construction of the project for 3 
        consecutive 2-year periods beyond the date that is 4 years after 
        the date of issuance of the license.

    Approved April 22, 2003.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 397 (S. 220):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 108-6 (Comm. on Energy and Commerce).
SENATE REPORTS: No. 108-22 accompanying S. 220 and 108-27 (both from 
Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 149 (2003):
            Feb. 11, considered and passed House.
            Apr. 7, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
§ 831.2204 Alternative forms of annuities available. ( a ) An employee or Member who is eligible to make an election under § 831.2203 may elect to receive his or her lump-sum credit plus an annuity computed in accordance with section 8339 of title 5, United States Code, for which they qualify (including any reduction for survivor benefits) and reduced under § 831.2205.
( b ) A retired employee or Member who elected an alternative form of annuity is subject to all provisions of subchapter III of chapter 83 of title 5, United States Code, as would otherwise apply to a retired employee or Member who did not elect an alternative form of annuity, except that an individual who elected an alternative form of annuity is not eligible to apply for disability annuity under section 8337 of such subchapter.
[51 FR 42989, Nov. 28, 1986, as amended at 53 FR 11634, Apr. 8, 1988; 54 FR 10136, Mar. 10, 1989]
SO FAR, SO GOOD...

----