alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 13.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F which
this certification accompanies, I, Philippe Calavia, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|1 | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2 | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the company as of and for the periods
presented in the report.
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The foregoing
certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not intended to be used or relied upon for any other purpose.



|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: September 29, 2004                                         
|                                                                 
|/s/    Philippe Calavia                                          
|Philippe Calavia Acting Chief Financial Officer of Air France-KLM
#### Walter COX, Movant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

March 26, 1948.

Montgomery and Montgomery for movant.

A. E. Funk, Attorney General, and Squire N. Williams, Assistant Attorney General, opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Conviction of appellant for selling intoxicating liquor within local option territory. Punished by a fine of $100 and imprisonment of 30 days in jail. Motion for appeal denied and judgment affirmed.
```

[Federal Register: September 7, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 172)]
[Notices]               
[Page 54421-54422]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr07se10-92]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

 
Sixth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 223: Airport Surface 
Wireless Communications

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 223: Airport Surface Wireless 
Communications meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 223: Airport Surface Wireless 
Communications.

DATES: The meeting will be held September 28-30, 2010 from 0900 a.m.-
1600 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at EUROCONTROL, Rue de la Fusee 96, 
Meeting Room VEGA, Brussels, Belgium.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC, 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 
833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a RTCA Special Committee 223: Airport Surface 
Wireless Communications meeting. The agenda will include:
     0900 a.m.--Opening Plenary
      Welcome and Introductions
      Approval of the Agenda
      Minutes of Last Meeting
      Coordination with Other GROUPs (EUROCAE, RTCA, ICAO, 
SESAR, WMF)
      Report on ad-hoc committee work with WIMAX Forum (ITT)
     AeroMACS System Profile
      Status of US Profile Development (Harris)
      SJU/WG-82 Draft Profile Presentation (ECTL)
      Develop combined Draft Profile
     Presentations
      Overview of terrestrial communication networks (FAA)
      User Services and Applications (FAA)
      NASA Cleveland Test Bed Test Results (ITT)
      Channel Model Considerations for AeroMACS (Uni Lancaster)
      SANDRA SP 6.2 Simulation Results (DLR, Uni Salzburg)
      Further presentations (to be coordinated)
     Refinement of TOR of WG-82

[[Page 54422]]

     AOB
     Summary and Next Meeting
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 1, 2010.
Robert L. Bostiga,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2010-22238 Filed 9-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
#### § 831.401 Purpose and scope.

This subpart describes the procedures that employees and Members must follow in making voluntary contributions under the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS). This subpart also describes the procedures that the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) will follow in accepting voluntary contributions, crediting interest on voluntary contribution accounts, and paying benefits based on voluntary contributions.
Exhibit 13.2

906 Certification

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies
and Gentlemen:

In connection with the periodic report of NetEase.com, Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,
2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Onward Choi, the Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certificate has not been, and shall not
be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|       |  |                               
|------ |  | ------------------------------
|Date:  |  | June 30, 2009                 
|       | 
|By:    |  | /s/ Onward Choi               
|Name:  |  | Onward Choi                   
|Title: |  | Acting Chief Financial Officer
#### Henry Huss, Appellant, v. J. W. Ford, Appellee.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Abstract of the Decision.

1. Brokers, § *1*
      ***
      *—when person agent and not "broker.*One who is given power to examine property and determine whether a *200trade of other property therefor should be made and who is not employed simply to bring the parties together is an agent and not a broker.

*199Appeal from the Circuit Court of Fayette county; the Hon. Thomas M. Jett, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the March term, 1915.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed December 1, 1915.

Statement of the Case.

Action by Henry Huss, plaintiff, against J. W. Ford, defendant, on a promissory note. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

The plaintiff’s assignor was authorized by the defendant to select suitable property and negotiate an exchange thereof for property of the defendant, which exchange was subsequently effected in accordance with a contract, entered into by plaintiff’s assignor in the name of the defendant as principal with a third party, one of the terms of which stipulated that such other party to the exchange should pay to the plaintiff’s assignor a specified amount as commissions. As a defense to an action by the plaintiff on the defendant’s note for commissions it was claimed that the note was void as the plaintiff’s assignor had contracted for commissions with both parties to the transaction.

F. M. Guinn, for appellant.

Brown & Burnside, for appellee.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same toi»ic and section number.

Mr. Justice McBride

delivered the opinion of the court.

*2002. Principal and agent, § *69*—when agent not entitled to recover commission, from both parties.*An agent who is given power to examine property, to determine the advisability of an exchange, and to bring the parties together may not recover commissions from both parties.

3. Evidence, § *322*—when parol evidence inadmissible to vary terms of contract.*As between a party to a contract and his agent executing it in his name, where the terms of such contract are definite and certain, parol evidence cannot be admitted to vary its terms.

4. Evidence, § *322*—when parol evidence inadmissible to vary contract for payment of commissions.*In an action by a real estate agent against his principal to recover on a note given in payment of commissions, the plaintiff cannot show by parol that money stipulated in a contract for the exchange of property entered into by him as agent in the name of his principal, to be paid to the plaintiff by the other party to the trade as brokerage fees, was in fact, to be paid and was received for and on account of another party.
### §3212. Congressional Record under frank of Members of Congress

(a) Members of Congress may send the Congressional Record as franked mail.

(b) Members of Congress may send, as franked mail, any part of, or a reprint of any part of, the Congressional Record, including speeches or reports contained therein, if such matter is mailable as franked mail under section 3210 of this title.

(Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 754; Pub. L. 93–191, §3, Dec. 18, 1973, 87 Stat. 741.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1973—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 93–191 incorporated existing text in provisions designated as subsec. (a).

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 93–191 incorporated existing text in provisions designated as subsec. (b), authorized sending, as franked mail, reprints of parts of Congressional Record, and authorized the mailing of Congressional Record if the listed matter is mailable as franked mail under section 3210 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1973 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 93–191 effective Dec. 18, 1973, see section 14 of Pub. L. 93–191, set out as a note under section 3210 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1971, pursuant to Resolution No. 71–9 of the Board of Governors. See section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note preceding section 101 of this title.
§ 701.5 Confidentiality. ( a ) As provided by § 309(c) of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended, BIS shall not publicly disclose the information it receives pursuant to this part, unless the firm furnishing the information subsequently specifically authorizes public disclosure.
( b ) Public disclosure must be authorized in writing by an official of the firm competent to make such an authorization.
( c ) Nothing in this provision shall prevent the use of data aggregated from information provided pursuant to this part in the summary report to the Congress described in § 701.1.
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2328

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 22 (legislative day, JULY 21), 2003

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2001 East Willard Street in Philadelphia, 

Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Robert A. Borski Post Office 

Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 2328 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 2001 East Willard Street in Philadelphia, Penn4 sylvania, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Robert 

5 A. Borski Post Office Building’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘Robert A. Borski Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives July 21, 2003. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE, ACCOUNTING AND

FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of New PacificVentures, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended January 31, 2006, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I Brent Petterson, Secretary/Treasurer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

   (1)  the Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

   (2)  the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/Brent PettersonBrent PettersonSecretary/TreasurerMarch 13, 2006
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§1350)





I,
      Thomas
      W. Martin, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of ICON Capital
      Corp., the Manager of the Registrant in connection with the Quarterly Report
      of
      ICON Income Fund Ten, LLC (the "LLC") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June
      30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the "Quarterly Report") certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





1.
            The
                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                13(a) or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m);
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
                all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                the LLC.








*Dated:
      December 11, 2007*





*/s/
      Thomas W. Martin*


Thomas
      W.
      Martin


Chairman,
      Chief Executive Officer and President of the Manager


(Principal
      Executive Officer)


ICON
      Capital Corp.


Manager
      of ICON Income Fund Ten, LLC
### §701. Findings

Congress finds that—

(1) Federal lands, parks, recreation areas, and waterways provide recreational opportunities for millions of Americans each year;

(2) Federal lands administered by Federal land management agencies contain valuable wildlife, scenery, natural and historic features, and other resources which may be damaged by litter and misuse;

(3) it is in the best interest of the United States and its citizens to maintain and preserve the beauty, safety, and availability of these Federal lands;

(4) these Federal land management agencies have been designated as the caretakers of these Federal lands and are responsible for maintaining and preserving those areas and facilities;

(5) there is great value in volunteer involvement in maintaining and preserving Federal lands for recreational use;

(6) the Federal land management agencies should be concerned with promoting a sense of pride and ownership among citizens toward these lands;

(7) the use of citizen volunteers in a national cleanup effort promotes these goals and encourages the thoughtful use of these Federal lands and facilities;

(8) the positive impact of annual cleanup events held at various recreation sites has already been proven by steadily declining levels of litter at these sites; and

(9) a national program for cleaning and maintaining Federal lands using volunteers will save millions of tax dollars.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1266.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 701 | 36:169i note. | Aug. 27, 1986, Pub. L. 99–402, §2, 100 Stat. 910. |

Section

In clause (2), the words "the several" are omitted as unnecessary.
July 1998
*This information is provided courtesy of Begiashvil & Co. Limited (see below for contactinformtion), a  law firm established in1995 in Tbilisi, Georgia.  This information does not  constitute U.S. Department of Commerceendorsement of Belgiashvil & Co. Limited or its services.*
**Table of Contents**
1. Introduction and General Information
2. Protection of Capital
3.  Investment Law
4.  Civil, Commercial, Company other EconomicLaw
5.  Laws and Regulations on Securities for Long TermLoans
6. Privatisation Laws and Regulations
7.  Labor Code
8.  Tax Law
9.  Enforcement of (Contractual) Rights
Contact Information:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

CENTRAL DAUPHIN SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Petitioner

v.

VALERIE HAWKINS, FOX 43 NEWS AND 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF 

PENNSYLVANIA, OFFICE OF OPEN 

RECORDS,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 16 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Published Opinion and 

Order of the Commonwealth Court 

at No. 1154 CD 2017, at 199 A.3d 

1005 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2018) entered on 

December 10, 2018, affirming the 

Order of the Dauphin County Court 

of Common Pleas at No. 2016-CV4401-MP entered on August 1, 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 1st day of September, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the following issue: 

Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in determining that 

the video recording, which is maintained by the District and 

which captures student conduct being investigated by the 

District for the purpose of determining if discipline should be 

imposed on students, is not an education record under [the 

Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, 20 U.S.C. § 

1232g].

The Commonwealth Court’s order is VACATED, and this matter is REMANDED for 

additional proceedings consistent with Easton Area Sch. Dist. v. Miller, ___ A.3d ___, 

2020 WL 3281099 (Pa. 2020). Allocatur is DENIED as to the remaining issue.

DECIDED: September 1, 2020
#### § 231.403 Severability.

If any provision of this part or its application to any person, act, or practice is held invalid, the remainder of the part or the application of its provisions to any person, act, or practice shall not be affected thereby.
#### Ariane A. Ross, Respondent, v. Julius B. Baer et al., as Ancillary Executors of Harold W. Ross, Deceased, et al., Appellants. In the Hatter of the Accounting of Julius B. Baer et al., as Executors of Harold W. Ross, Deceased, et al., Appellants.

Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. Ho opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Breitel and Bastow, JJ.
**GAO-03-354**                      Published: Feb 13, 2003. Publicly Released: Feb 13, 2003.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Status of FY22 Projects 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

Unable to obtain information on the National Park Service's (Park Service) travel costs to ensure that the agency is spending appropriated funds effectively and efficiently, the Congress asked GAO to assess the availability of travel cost information and provide certain travel cost information, such as the cost of foreign travel and for attending conferences, for the Park Service for each of the past 4 fiscal years.

## Recommendations

## Recommendations for Executive Action

## Full Report

Highlights

Full Report (26 pages)

Accessible Text 

## GAO Contacts

### 

Beryl (Berri) H. Davis
DavisBH@gao.gov

(202) 512-2623

## Office of Public Affairs

### Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

### Public Inquiries

Public Affairs
PublicAffairs@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

Government Operations

Accounting proceduresAccounting systemsAppropriated fundsFunds managementInternational travelReporting requirementsTravel costsInflationEmbassy managementFinancial management