alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-007 January 22, 2008 

NRC ACCEPTS APPLICATIONS FOR BELLEFONTE NEW REACTORS, 

AMENDED AP1000 DESIGN FOR REVIEW 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has accepted for review two related 

applications: a request from Westinghouse to amend the certified AP1000 reactor design, 

and a combined license (COL) application for two new AP1000 reactors at the Bellefonte 

site near Scottsboro, Ala. The Bellefonte application is the second COL the agency has 

accepted for review. 

 “Westinghouse has provided what we need to start the review process, and since 

the Tennessee Valley Authority wants permission to build the AP1000 at Bellefonte, we 

can ‘docket’ both applications at the same time,” said Bill Borchardt, Director of the 

NRC’s Office of New Reactors. “The staff expects their AP1000 review will run through 

2009, while the Bellefonte work will continue into 2011.” 

The AP1000 is a 1,100 MWe pressurized-water reactor design the NRC certified 

in 2006. Westinghouse’s amendment seeks to: 1) revise the design’s steam generators, 

2) resolve several issues that would otherwise be left to COL applicants, and 

3) voluntarily address the NRC’s proposed rule on aircraft impact assessments. The 

amendment application (minus proprietary or security-related details), will be available 

on the NRC Web site here: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-licensing/designcert/amended-ap1000.html . 

TVA submitted its application Oct. 30, 2007, to build and operate two AP1000 

reactors at the Alabama site, where two partially constructed reactors were cancelled in 

2006. The application (minus proprietary or security-related details), is available on the 

NRC Web site here: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-licensing/col/bellefonte.html . 

Docketing these applications does not indicate whether the Commission will 

approve or reject the requests. The NRC will shortly issue in the Federal Register a 
notice of opportunity to participate in a hearing on the Bellefonte application. Petitions to 

intervene in a hearing may be filed within 60 days of the notice, by anyone whose interest 

may be affected by the proposed license and who wishes to participate as a party in the 

proceeding. 

 The NRC is currently reviewing a COL application for the South Texas Project 

site in Texas, along with conducting acceptance reviews on COL applications for the 

North Anna site in Virginia and the Lee site in South Carolina. The agency expects an 

additional 15 applications in 2008. Information about the new reactor licensing process is 

available on the NRC Web site here: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactorlicensing.html . 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a 

SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's 

Web site.
#### Clara Davenport, Appellee, v. Calumet & South Chicago Railway Company, Appellant.

Gen. No. 21,348.

(Not to he reported in full.)

Abstract of the Decision.

1. Street railroads, § *131*
      ***
      *—when negligence must*Be *proved*By *preponderance of evidence.*The plaintiff, in an action on the case against a street railway company for damages for personal injuries alleged to be due to negligence in starting a car which had stopped, must sustain his case by a preponderance of the evidence.

2. Street railroads, § *131*
      ***
      *—when negligence in starting car not proved*By *preponderance of evidence.*The plaintiff, in an action against a street railway company for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained as the result of negligence in start*373ing the car after it had stopped and while plaintiff was trying to get off, fails to sustain his case by a preponderance of evidence where the testimony of plaintiff and another that the car stopped and started with a jerk while plaintiff was attempting to get off was directly contradicted by six witnesses for defendant who testified that plaintiff alighted while the car was in motion.

*372Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Theodore Brentano, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the March term, 1915.

Reversed with finding of fact.

Opinion filed January 3, 1916.

Rehearing denied January 17, 1916.

*Certiorari*denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

Statement of the Case.

Action on the case by Clara Davenport, plaintiff, against the Calumet & South Chicago Railway Company, a corporation, defendant, for damagés for personal injuries sustained while attempting to alight from a moving street car. From a verdict for plaintiff for $10,000, defendant appeals.

John E. Kehoe and Charles LeRoy Brown, for appellant; John R. Guilliams, of counsel.

Peden, Kahn & Murphy, for appellee; R. C. Merrick, of counsel.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

See Illinois Notes Digest, ,Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

*3733. Appeal and error, § *49*
      ***
      *—when Appellate Court may make findings of fact.*When the Appellate Court, upon review, determines that the evidence fails to sustain the verdict, it may reverse the judgment with a finding of fact.
Argued and submitted December 5,

affirmed December 27, 2000

#### In the Matter of James Richard Sullivan, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*JAMES RICHARD SULLIVAN, *Appellant.*

(9903 63020; CA A106222)

15 P3d 1263

Susan D. Isaacs argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Denise Fjordbeck, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Lipscomb, Judge pro tempore.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. *State v. Buffum,*166 Or App 552, 999 P2d 541, *rev allowed*331 Or 361 (2000).
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 JULY 27, 2009

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 08-16150

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 08-00164-CR-J-20MCR

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MILAN MARTINIC,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(July 27, 2009)

Before BLACK, BARKETT and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Donna Lee Elm, appointed counsel for Milan Martinic in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396,

18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Martinic’s convictions and

sentences are AFFIRMED.

2
### [§3482A. Vacant]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Prior to renumbering of sections 1651 to 1693 of this chapter as sections 3451 to 3493 by Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 406, section 1682A of this chapter, added Pub. L. 95–202, title II, §201(a), Nov. 23, 1977, 91 Stat. 1436; amended Pub. L. 97–295, §4(41), Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1308, which related to accelerated payment of educational assistance allowances, was repealed by Pub. L. 100–689, title I, §124(a), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4174.
§ 842.906 Requests from individuals. ( a ) An employee who requests credit for service under 5 U.S.C. 8412(d) bears the burden of proof with respect to that service, and must provide the employing agency with all pertinent information regarding duties performed.
( b ) An employee who is currently serving in a position that has not been approved as a primary or secondary position, but who believes that his or her service is creditable as service in a primary or secondary position may request the agency head to determine whether or not the employee's current service should be credited and, if it qualifies, whether it should be credited as service in a primary or secondary position. A written request for current service must be made within 6 months after entering the position or after any significant change in the position.
( c ) A current or former employee (or the survivor of a former employee) who believes that a period of past service in an unapproved position qualifies as service in a primary or secondary position and meets the conditions for credit may request the agency head to determine whether or not the employee's past service should be credited and, if it qualifies, whether it should be credited as service in a primary or secondary position. A written request for past service must be made no later than December 31, 2000.
( d ) The agency head may extend the time limit for filing under paragraph (b) or (c) of this section when, in the judgment of such agency head, the individual shows that he or she was prevented by circumstances beyond his or her control from making the request within the time limit.
# L_2021067EN.01003201.xml

| 25.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 67/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 67/32

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 141/2018

of 6 July 2018

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2021/203]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/471 of 21 March 2018 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 297/95 as regards the adjustment of the fees of the European Medicines Agency to the inflation rate with effect from 1 April 2018 (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/471 of 21 March 2018 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 297/95 as regards the adjustment of the fees of the European Medicines Agency to the inflation rate with effect from 1 April 2018 (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 15h (Council Regulation (EC) No 297/95) of Chapter XIII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32018 R 0471: Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/471 of 21 March 2018 (OJ L 79, 22.3.2018, p. 19).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32018 R 0471: Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/471 of 21 March 2018 (OJ L 79, 22.3.2018, p. 19).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) 2018/471 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 7 July 2018, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 6 July 2018.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda Helen SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 79, 22.3.2018, p. 19.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
# L_2021067EN.01004501.xml

| 25.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 67/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 67/45

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 152/2018

of 6 July 2018

amending Annex XI (Electronic communication, audiovisual services and information society) to the EEA Agreement [2021/214]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Directive 2014/61/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on measures to reduce the cost of deploying high-speed electronic communications networks (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Directive 2014/61/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on measures to reduce the cost of deploying high-speed electronic communications networks (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 5czm (Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/687) of Annex XI to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘5czn. | 32014 L 0061: Directive 2014/61/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on measures to reduce the cost of deploying high-speed electronic communications networks (OJ L 155, 23.5.2014, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘5czn.

32014 L 0061: Directive 2014/61/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on measures to reduce the cost of deploying high-speed electronic communications networks (OJ L 155, 23.5.2014, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Directive 2014/61/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 7 July 2018, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 6 July 2018.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda Helen SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 155, 23.5.2014, p. 1.

1

(*1)  Constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Surface Transportation Board 

      ( print page 67625)    
The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw on behalf of The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF) (WB461-11—10/20/2004) for permission to use certain data from the Board's Carload Waybill Samples. A copy of this request may be obtained from the Office of Economics, Environmental Analysis, and Administration. 

The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; therefore, if any parties object to these requests, they should file their objections with the Director of the Board's Office of Economics, Environmental Analysis, and Administration within 14 calendar days of the date of this notice. The rules for release of waybill data are codified at 49 CFR 1244.9.

*Contact:*                     Mac Frampton, (202) 565-1541.                 

Vernon A. Williams,

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 04-25610 Filed 11-17-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
Editorial Note on Subpart C of Part 9701
Editorial Note: At 73 FR 58435, Oct. 7, 2008, the application of subpart C to part 9701 was rescinded.

§ 9701.325 Treatment of employees whose rate of basic pay falls below the minimum rate of their band. ( a ) In the case of an employee who does not receive a pay increase under § 9701.323 because of an unacceptable rating of record and whose rate of basic pay falls below the minimum rate of his or her band as a result of that rating, DHS must— ( 1 ) If the employee demonstrates performance that meets or exceeds performance expectations within 90 days after the date of the rate range adjustment, issue a new rating of record under § 9701.409(b) and adjust the employee's pay prospectively by making the increase effective on the first day of the first pay period beginning on or after the date the new rating of record is issued; or
( 2 ) Initiate action within 90 days after the date of the rate range adjustment to demote or remove the employee in accordance with the adverse action procedures established in subpart F of this part.
( b ) If DHS fails to initiate a removal or demotion action under paragraph (a)(2) of this section within 90 days after the date of a rate range adjustment, the employee becomes entitled to the minimum rate of his or her band rate range on the first day of the first pay period beginning on or after the 90th day following the date of the rate range adjustment.
### §20910. Records and inspection

(a) Records.—The Corporation shall keep—

(1) correct and complete records of account;

(2) minutes of the proceedings of its members, board of directors, and committees having any of the authority of its board of directors; and

(3) at its principal office, a record of the names and addresses of its members entitled to vote.

(b) Inspection.—A member entitled to vote, or an agent or attorney of the member, may inspect the records of the corporation for any proper purpose, at any reasonable time.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1292.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20910 | 36:2110. | Aug. 10, 1982, Pub. L. 97–234, §10, 96 Stat. 263. |

Section

The word "records" is substituted for "books and records" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code. The words "Nothing in this section shall be construed to contravene any applicable State law" are omitted as unnecessary.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Marco Community Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Richard Storm, Jr., Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the Report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                           |  |                                            
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------
|Date: May 12, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    RICHARD STORM, JR.
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                           | 
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                           |  | Richard Storm, Jr., Chief Executive Officer
#### § 9401.113 Waivers.

The DAEO may grant a written waiver from any provision of this part where the DAEO finds good cause to do so; provided, however, that the DAEO will not do so unless the DAEO finds that the waiver is not inconsistent with the OGE Standards or otherwise prohibited by law and that, under the particular circumstances, application of the provision being waived is not necessary in order to avoid a violation of an ethics rule. Each waiver must be in writing and supported by a statement of facts and findings and may impose appropriate conditions, such as requiring the employee to execute a written disqualification statement.
Editorial Note on Part 15
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 15 appear at 62 FR 19669, Apr. 23, 1997.

§ 15.32 Procedures for the handling of lawsuits against Department employees arising within the scope of their office or employment. The following procedures shall be followed in the event that a civil action or proceeding is brought, in any court, against a present or former employee of the Department (or against his/her estate) for personal injury, loss of property or death, resulting from the Department employee's activities while acting within the scope of his/her office or employment: ( a ) After being served with process or pleadings in such an action or proceeding, the employee (or the executor(rix) or administrator(rix)) of the estate shall within five (5) calendar days of receipt, deliver all such process and pleadings or an attested true copy thereof, together with a fully detailed report of the circumstances of the incident giving rise to the court action or proceeding to the General Counsel. Where appropriate, the General Counsel, or his/her designee, may request that the Department of Justice provide legal representation for the present or former Department employee.
( b ) ( 1 ) Only if a present or former employee of the Department has satisfied the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section in a timely fashion, may the employee subsequently request indemnification to satisfy a verdict, judgment, or award entered against that employee.
( 2 ) No request for indemnification will be considered unless the employee has submitted a written request, with appropriate documentation, including copies of the verdict, judgment, appeal bond, award, or settlement proposal through the employee's supervisory chain to the head of the employee's component. The written request will include an explanation by the employee of how the employee was working within the scope of employment and whether the employee has insurance or any other source of indemnification.
( 3 ) The head of the component or his/her designee will forward the employee's request with a recommendation to the General Counsel for review. The request for indemnification shall include a detailed analysis of the basis for the recommendation. The head of the component will also certify to the General Counsel that the component has funds available to pay the indemnification.
( c ) The General Counsel or his/her designee will review the circumstances of the incident giving rise to the action or proceeding, and all data bearing upon the question of whether the employee was acting within the scope of his/her employment. Where appropriate, the agency shall seek the views of the Department of Justice and/or the U.S. Attorney for the district embracing the place where the action or proceeding is brought.
( d ) The General Counsel shall forward the request, the accompanying documentation, and the General Counsel's recommendation to the Secretary or his/her designee for decision.