alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 13, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

127830-33 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PAUL HELBER, DIANE HELBER, Stephen J. Markman, SUSAN IRWIN, JOHN IRWIN, JAMES Justices NIETERS and PAMELA NIETERS, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v SC: 127830 

 COA: 247700 

Washtenaw CC: 00-001201-CE 

CITY OF ANN ARBOR,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

HOWARD ANDREWS and MURIEL D. 

ANDREWS, 

Plaintiffs,

and 

KATHY ANN MOILANEN, EDWARD M.

VUYLSTEKE, LAWRENCE THALL,

MARCELLA THALL and MICHAEL THALL, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v SC: 127831 

 COA: 247701 

Washtenaw CC: 00-001202-CE 

CITY OF ANN ARBOR,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

WARREN G. PALMER, ZERILDA PALMER, 

ROBERT ZIMMERMAN, ENID ZIMMERMAN, 

GREGORY HAWKINS and MASADA HABHAB, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v SC: 127832 

 COA: 247702 

Washtenaw CC: 00-001203-CE 

CITY OF ANN ARBOR,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 
 _________________________________________ 

 

 

2 

CAROL JACOBSEN, JED JACOBSON, 

DILIP NIGAM and SABITA NIGAM, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v SC: 127833 

 COA: 247703 

Washtenaw CC: 00-001205-CE 

CITY OF ANN ARBOR and WASHTENAW 

COUNTY DRAIN COMMISSIONER, 

Defendants-Appellees, 

and 

LANS BASIN, INC.

Defendant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 26, 2004 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal. 

d1006 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 13, 2005 

Clerk
Order entered December 18, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01529-CV

No. 05-15-01530-CV

No. 05-15-01531-CV

IN RE ANDREW PETE, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-33559-V, F12-33560-V, F12-33561-V

ORDER

Before Justices Lang, Fillmore and Brown

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, to the extent relator’s petition seeks release 

from custody, we DISMISS relator’s petition. We DENY the petition with regard to all other 

relief relator seeks.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
#### § 919.100 What does this part do?

This part adopts a governmentwide system of debarment and suspension for OPM nonprocurement activities. It also provides for reciprocal exclusion of persons who have been excluded under the Federal Acquisition Regulation, and provides for the consolidated listing of all persons who are excluded, or disqualified by statute, executive order, or other legal authority. This part satisfies the requirements in section 3 of Executive Order 12549, “Debarment and Suspension” (3 CFR 1986 Comp., p. 189), Executive Order 12689, “Debarment and Suspension” (3 CFR 1989 Comp., p. 235) and 31 U.S.C. 6101 note (Section 2455, Public Law 103-355, 108 Stat. 3327).
### §5401. Authorization

(a) The Postal Service is authorized to provide for the safe and expeditious transportation of mail by aircraft.

(b) Except as otherwise provided in section 5402 of this title, the Postal Service may make such rules, regulations, and orders consistent with part A of subtitle VII of title 49, or any order, rule, or regulation made by the Secretary of Transportation thereunder, as may be necessary for such transportation.

(Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 772; Pub. L. 98–443, §9(g)(3), Oct. 4, 1984, 98 Stat. 1707; Pub. L. 103–272, §5(k)(3), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1375.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 103–272 substituted "part A of subtitle VII" for "sections 1301–1542".

1984—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 98–443 substituted "Secretary of Transportation" for "Civil Aeronautics Board".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–443 effective Jan. 1, 1985, see section 9(v) of Pub. L. 98–443, set out as a note under section 5314 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1971, pursuant to Resolution No. 71–9 of the Board of Governors. See section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note preceding section 101 of this title.
#### Mildred Orloff, Respondent, v. Anderson Hotel, Inc., et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
§ 231.204 Additional conditions on certain joint research or technology licensing. ( a ) In addition to the conditions of the Technology Clawback (§ 231.203), the Secretary will specify, in the required agreement with the covered entity, any additional measures that covered entities must take to mitigate the risk of circumvention of the Technology Clawback, including measures that will allow the Secretary to recover up to the full amount of the Federal financial assistance provided to the covered entity, if, during the term applicable to the award, any related entity engages in joint research or technology licensing that would violate the Technology Clawback if engaged in by the covered entity.
( b ) For purposes of this rule, a related entity is any entity that directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls or is controlled by, or is under common control with, the covered entity.
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE 

GLAZING HEALTH AND WELFARE 

TRUST; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE 

SOUTHERN NEVADA GLAZIERS AND 

FABRICATORS PENSION TRUST FUND;

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE 

PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS UNION 

LOCAL 525 PENSION PLAN; THE 

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE 

PAINTERS, GLAZIERS AND 

FLOORCOVERERS JOINT 

APPRENTICESHIP AND JOURNEYMAN 

TRAINING TRUST; THE BOARD OF 

TRUSTEES OF THE PAINTERS,

GLAZIERS AND FLOORCOVERERS 

SAFETY TRAINING TRUST FUND; THE 

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE 

PAINTERS AND FLOORCOVERERS 

JOINT COMMITTEE; THE BOARD OF 

TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTHERN 

NEVADA PAINTERS AND 

DECORATORS AND GLAZIERS LABORMANAGEMENT COOPERATION 

COMMITTEE TRUST; THE BOARD OF 

TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL 

UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED 

TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND;

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE 

EMPLOYEE PAINTERS’ TRUST; THE 

No. 16-15588

D.C. No.

2:15-cv-01754-

KJD-VCF

ORDER
2 BD. OF TRUSTEES V. CHAMBERS

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE 

CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AND 

LABORERS HEALTH AND WELFARE 

TRUST; THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF 

THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AND 

LABORERS JOINT PENSION TRUST;

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE 

CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AND 

LABORERS VACATION TRUST; THE 

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SOUTHERN 

NEVADA LABORERS LOCAL 872

TRAINING TRUST; BOARD OF 

TRUSTEES OF THE PLUMBERS AND 

PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 525 HEALTH AND 

WELFARE TRUST AND PLAN; BOARD 

OF TRUSTEES OF THE PLUMBERS AND 

PIPEFITTERS UNION LOCAL 525

PENSION PLAN; BOARD OF TRUSTEES 

OF PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS 

LOCAL UNION 525 APPRENTICE AND 

JOURNEYMAN TRAINING TRUST FOR 

SOUTHERN NEVADA,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

SHANNON CHAMBERS, Nevada Labor 

Commissioner, in her official 

capacity,

Defendant-Appellant.

Filed May 22, 2019
BD. OF TRUSTEES V. CHAMBERS 3

ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, 

it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to 

Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit 

Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in this case 

shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth 

Circuit.
No. I-10-042 

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331 

September 15, 2010

E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

NEW NRC RESIDENT INSPECTOR ASSIGNED TO CALVERT CLIFFS NUCLEAR PLANT

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia, Pa., 

have selected Matthew Osborn as the new resident inspector at the 

Calvert Cliffs nuclear power plant in Lusby, Md. He joins NRC Senior 

Resident Inspector Silas Kennedy at the two-unit site, which is operated 

by Constellation Energy. 

 Osborn joined the agency’s Region I staff in 2009. He previously 

served in the United States Navy for six years as a nuclear submarine 

officer and a Naval ROTC instructor at the University of Oklahoma. 

 Osborn has a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from Texas A&M, a master’s 

in business administration from the University of Oklahoma and a master’s in engineering 

management from Old Dominion University. He completed the Navy’s nuclear power program 

and the NRC’s inspector qualification program. 

 “Matt Osborn has the experience, training and commitment to safety that will help the 

NRC carry out its mission of protecting people and the environment by ensuring the safe 

operation of Calvert Cliffs,” said acting NRC Region I Administrator Marc L. Dapas. 

 Each U.S. commercial nuclear plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They serve 

as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major work 

projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. Resident Inspectors can be assigned to 

any one site for up to seven years. 

 The Calvert Cliffs resident inspectors can be reached at 410/586-2626. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region I 

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov
#### § 296.12 Reporting and auditing requirements.

Each award by the Program shall contain procedures regarding technical, business, and financial reporting and auditing requirements to ensure that awards are being used in accordance with the Program's objectives and applicable Federal cost principles. The purpose of the technical reporting is to monitor “best effort” progress toward overall project goals. The purpose of the business reporting is to monitor project performance against the Program's mission as required by the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) mandate for program evaluation. The purpose of the financial reporting is to monitor the status of project funds. The audit standards to be applied to TIP awards are the “Government Auditing Standards” (GAS) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and any Program-specific audit guidelines or requirements prescribed in the award terms and conditions. To implement paragraph (f) of § 14.25 of this title, audit standards and award terms may stipulate that “total Federal and non-Federal funds authorized by the Grants Officer” means the total Federal and non-Federal funds authorized by the Grants Officer annually.
§ 30.50 General requirements for filing import entries. Electronic entry summary filing through the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE), paper import entry summaries (CBP-7501), or paper record of vessel foreign repair or equipment purchase (CBP-226) shall be completed by the importer of record or its licensed customs broker and filed directly with CBP in accordance with 19 CFR parts 1-199. Information on all mail and informal entries required for statistical and CBP purposes shall be reported, including value not subject to duty. Upon request, the importer of record or the importer's licensed customs broker shall provide the Census Bureau with information or documentation necessary to verify the accuracy of the reported information, or to resolve problems regarding the reported import transaction received by the Census Bureau. ( a ) Import information for statistical purposes shall be filed for goods shipped as follows: ( 1 ) Entering the United States from foreign countries.
( 2 ) Admitted to U.S. FTZs.
( 3 ) From the U.S. Virgin Islands.
( 4 ) From other nonforeign areas (except Puerto Rico).
( b ) Sources for collecting import statistics include the following: ( 1 ) CBP's ABI Program (see 19 CFR Subpart A, Part 143).
( 2 ) CBP-7501 paper entry summaries required for individual transactions (see 19 CFR Subpart B, Part 142).
( 3 ) CBP-226, Record of Vessel Foreign Repair or Equipment Purchase (see 19 CFR 4.7 and 4.14).
( 4 ) CBP-214, Application for Foreign Trade Zone Admission and/or Status Designation (Statistical copy).
( 5 ) Electronic CBP Form 214 Admissions (e214).
( c ) The Kimberley Process Certificate (KPC) for all imports of rough diamonds classified under HS subheadings 7102.10, 7102.21, 7102.31 must be faxed by the importer or customs broker to the Census Bureau on (800) 457-7328, or provided by other methods as permitted by the Census Bureau, immediately after entry of the shipment in the United States.
[73 FR 31555, June 2, 2008, as amended at 78 FR 16382, Mar. 14, 2013; 82 FR 18392, Apr. 19, 2017; 83 FR 17751, Apr. 24, 2018]
# L_2023164EN.01005101.xml

| 29.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 164/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 164/51

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 318/2022

of 9 December 2022

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2023/1260]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/381 of 4 March 2022 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/450 as regards the publication of references of European Assessment Documents for reinforced high density EPS structural panel system for building units and other construction products (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/381 of 4 March 2022 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/450 as regards the publication of references of European Assessment Documents for reinforced high density EPS structural panel system for building units and other construction products (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 1zzp (Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/450) of Chapter XXI of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘- | 32022 D 0381: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/381 of 4 March 2022 (OJ L 75, 7.3.2022, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘-

32022 D 0381: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/381 of 4 March 2022 (OJ L 75, 7.3.2022, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/381 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 10 December 2022, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 9 December 2022.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kristján Andri STEFÁNSSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 75, 7.3.2022, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
#### § 231.401 Amendment.

Not later than August 9, 2024, and not less frequently than once every two years thereafter for the eight-year period after the last award of Federal financial assistance under 15 U.S.C. 4652 is made, the Secretary, after public notice and an opportunity for comment, if applicable and necessary, will issue a public notice identifying any additional semiconductors included in the meaning of the term “legacy semiconductor.”
R E T h Ph D CHP R. 

E. 

Too

hey, Ph.D., CHP

Past President, HPS
Purpose of the Workshop

yTo develop a definition of safety c

(SC) and the description/traits thbe used in the development of a fbe used in the development of

a f

safety culture policy statement

yHeld Feb 2-4 2010, Rockville, MD 

(between snowpocalypse and snowmageddon)
Stakeholders

yLicensees (breakout groups):

Reactors-new constructionMaterials

-Industrial

Materials-Medical

yProfessional Societiesy Members of the Public
Role of Panelists

y Provide perspective as a licensee, a member 

public, or member of a specific organization

y Work with NRC staff to develop a common d

of safety culture and a common set of descritraits and concepts of safety culture that apptraits and concepts of safety culture that app

NRC licensees and certificate holders

y Contribute to and participate in the discussi

the breakout sessions

y Consider positions and views of the breakou

participants and articulate these views in thdiscussions
Panelists

Kevin Buckley (AAPM)Gerald Castro (JCHA)David Garchow (INPO)Billie Garde (Member of 

the Public

)

Diane Sieracki (DGayle Staton (NDDuann Vandersli

Thistlewaite (SN

) Richard Toohe

y

(

Tom Houghton (NEI)Bob Link (AREVA)George Marshall (APNGA)Wayne Rice (AFL-CIO)Shawn Seeley (OAS)

y( 

Victoria Winfrey 

Island Indian Community TriCouncil)

Bruce Williams (SChuck Workman 
Workshop Process Day 1

y Presentations by NRC staff (or contra

on background of the initiative, goals worksho

pg y , other 

guidance on safet

y cu

(INPO, IAEA, etc.)

yBreakout sessions to develop draft 

definitions of safety culture for NRC u
Workshop Process Day 2

y Group session to reconcile three versi

safety culture definition into one that ever

yone could live with

yBreakout sessions to identify proper s

culture practices/characteristics
Workshop Process Day 3

y Group session to bin those 150 or so sp

traits into 6-8 areas

y Identification of these areas as overrid

Identification of these areas as overrid

traits

yDecided we were finished and additio

workshops not needed
Next Steps

yThe NRC expectation/vision is to get 

feedback on the February Workshop developed safety culture definition ant it d t d t di f th traits and get an understanding of the 

challenges in adoption/use of the defiand traits (this would include the aspthe definition and traits that resonate useful to their type of organizations). 

y So here we are!
§ 285.12 Monitoring visits. ( a ) In addition to regularly scheduled assessments, monitoring visits may be conducted by NVLAP at any time during the accreditation period. They may occur for cause or on a random selection basis. While most monitoring visits will be scheduled in advance with the laboratory, NVLAP may conduct unannounced monitoring visits.
( b ) The scope of a monitoring visit may range from checking a few designated items to a complete review. The assessors may review nonconformity resolutions, verify reported changes in the laboratory's personnel, facilities or operations, or evaluate proficiency testing activities, when appropriate.
[85 FR 60060, Sept. 24, 2020]
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Edward J. Casey, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 59161;

First District (3rd Division)

August 1, 1974.

Edward S. Richman, of Chicago, for appellant.

Bernard Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago, for the People.

PER CURIAM.

MEJDA, J., took no part.
## Main menu

- Videos
- What We Do
- Contact Us

# Manasota Plating Superfund Site

Groundwater contaminated with cyanide is remediated using a unique on-site de-watering and water treatment operation at an  abandoned electroplating facility in Sarasota, FL. (1995)

**Running Time:** 09:28

- cleanup technology
- ertv
- groundwater
- soil contamination

## Environmental Response Television

          - Browse Videos
          - ERTV Home
          - What We Do
          - Contact Us

## Environmental Response Team Links

          - ERT Home
          - ERT Software Support
          - EPA On Scene Coordinator
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2022-04-20T06:17:15-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
#### Stephen K. Watts v. Doull Miller Company.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
No. IV-10-018 

Contact: Victor Dricks (817) 860-8128 

 Lara Uselding (817) 276-6519 

 

 April 26, 2010 

 E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD OPEN HOUSE TO DISCUSS 

 2009 PERFORMANCE OF CALLAWAY NUCLEAR PLANT 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold an open house in Fulton, Mo., on 

May 27, with representatives of AmerenUE, to discuss the agency=s 2009 assessment of safety 

performance for the Callaway nuclear power plant. 

The open house will begin at 5 p.m. at the Burton Business Building, Classroom 6, 

William Woods University, One University Ave., in Fulton. 

At the open house, members of the public will have an opportunity to meet informally 

with the NRC staff, ask questions and learn about the agency’s role in ensuring safe plant 

operation. 

 AThe NRC continually reviews the performance of Callaway and the nation=s other 

commercial nuclear power facilities,@ NRC Region IV Administrator Elmo E. Collins said. AThis 

informal meeting will provide members of the public with an opportunity to learn about our 

annual assessment of safety performance at the plant.@

The NRC said Callaway operated safely during 2009 and will receive the detailed 

inspection regime during 2010 used by the NRC for plants that are operating well. Inspections 

are performed by two NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant and by inspection 

specialists from the Region IV Office in Arlington, Texas. 

A letter sent from the NRC Region IV office to plant officials addresses the performance 

of the plant during 2009. It is available on the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/call_2009q4.pdf. 

Current performance information for Callaway is available on the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/CALL/call_chart.html. 

 ### 

 

 NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125 

Telephone: (817) 860-8128