alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §7308. Office of Rural Health

(a) Establishment.—There is established in the Department within the Office of the Under Secretary for Health an office to be known as the "Office of Rural Health" (in this section referred to as the "Office").

(b) Head.—The Director of the Office of Rural Health shall be the head of the Office. The Director of the Office of Rural Health shall be appointed by the Under Secretary of Health from among individuals qualified to perform the duties of the position.

(c) Functions.—The functions of the Office are as follows:

(1) In cooperation with the medical, rehabilitation, health services, and cooperative studies research programs in the Office of Policy and the Office of Research and Development of the Veterans Health Administration, to assist the Under Secretary for Health in conducting, coordinating, promoting, and disseminating research into issues affecting veterans living in rural areas.

(2) To work with all personnel and offices of the Department of Veterans Affairs to develop, refine, and promulgate policies, best practices, lessons learned, and innovative and successful programs to improve care and services for veterans who reside in rural areas of the United States.

(3) To designate in each Veterans Integrated Service Network (VISN) an individual who shall consult on and coordinate the discharge in such Network of programs and activities of the Office for veterans who reside in rural areas of the United States.

(4) To perform such other functions and duties as the Secretary or the Under Secretary for Health considers appropriate.

(d) Rural Health Resource Centers.—(1) There are, in the Office, veterans rural health resource centers that serve as satellite offices for the Office.

(2) The veterans rural health resource centers have purposes as follows:

(A) To improve the understanding of the Office of the challenges faced by veterans living in rural areas.

(B) To identify disparities in the availability of health care to veterans living in rural areas.

(C) To formulate practices or programs to enhance the delivery of health care to veterans living in rural areas.

(D) To develop special practices and products for the benefit of veterans living in rural areas and for implementation of such practices and products in the Department systemwide.

(Added Pub. L. 109–461, title II, §212(a)(1), Dec. 22, 2006, 120 Stat. 3421; amended Pub. L. 112–154, title I, §110, Aug. 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 1175.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 112–154 added subsec. (d).
§ 2007.6 Information open to public inspection. With exception of information subject to § 2007.7 any person may, upon request inspect at the Office of the United States Trade Representative: ( a ) Any written request, brief, or similar submission of information made pursuant to this part; and
( b ) Any stenographic record of any public hearings which may be held pursuant to this part.
C O U R T O F A P P E A LS EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEXAS ELPASO, TEXAS

TH E ST AT E O F TE XA S, Ap pe lla nt,
v.
N I N E H U N D RE D E I G H T Y
- T WO THOUSAND ONE HU

NDRED TEN DOL LARS AND FO UR BAG S CONTAI NI NG AN U

NDETERMI

NED AMOUNT O F US CURRENCY, Ap pe lle e s. § § § § § § § § No . 0 8- 11 -0 02 53 -C V

Appea l from the Criminal District Court No. 1 of El Pa so County , T e xas (TC# 2011-712)

M EM OR

AN DU M OP IN ION Appellant filed a

notice of inter locutory

appea l, stating its intent to appeal f rom the trial court’s de nial of its plea to the jurisdiction. Acc ordingto the notice of a ppeal, Appe llant argued in its pl ea to the jur isdiction that the court lacke d jurisdiction over an unna med interve nor’s claim. The notice states that the trial judg e ora lly denied the ple a on August 11, 2011, and that Appellant submitted a propose d order on August 15, 2011. The cour t coordinator later infor

med Appellant that the judg e wa s unwilling to sign the order
. Be cause it appear ed that ther e is no appe alable or der, the Clerk of this Court notified the pa rt ie s o f t he Court ’s int e nt t o d ism iss the a pp e a l f or la c k o f j ur isd ic tio n unle ss a ny pa rt y c ou ld
s h o w gr o un d s fo r c o n t i nu i n g th e ap p ea l
. Ap p el l an tre s p o n d edt o th e n o t i ce b y s u b m i tt i n g a pa rt ia l c op y of a tr ans c ri pt, re fl e c tin gthe jud g e ’s or a l r uli ng . Ci tin gTe xas R

ule of Ap pe llate Pr oc e dure 33 .1 , App e lla

nt a rgue s th at th e la c k o f a

signe d o rd e r d oe s n ot p re c lud e its a bil ity to-2-

se e k r e lie f f

ro m th is C ourt . Rule 33.1 g overns pr eser

vation of er

ror; it does not perta in to appellate jurisdiction. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 33.1. Rul e 26.1 does pe rtain to jurisdiction. I t provides that a notice of int e rl oc uto ry

a pp e a l “ mus t be fi le d w ith in 2 0 d ay s a ft e r t he jud g me nt o r o rd e r i s signed .” T EX .R.A PP .P. 26.1(b)[Emphasis added]. Thus, an appea l may only be per fec ted from a

written order , not an ora l ruling. See I n re Nationwi de Credit, Inc. , N o . 1 3
- 1 0
- 0 0 0 0 7
- CV , 2 0 1 0 WL 59 68 09 , at *4 (T e x.Ap p. -- Cor pu s Chri sti F e b. 18 , 2 01 0, or ig . p ro c e e din g )( me m. o p. ); HubbardJowers v. Starfire Enters., Ltd. , No. 02-06-462- CV, 2007 WL439052, at *1 (Te x .App.--F ort Wor th F e b. 8, 20 07 , n o p e t.) (m e m. o p. ); In re J ohnston , 79 S.W .3d 195, 197-98 (Te x .App.-- Te xar ka na 20 02 , o ri g . p ro c e e din g ); see also Farme r v. Ben E. Keith Co. , 907 S.W .2d 495, 496 (Tex. 1995)(“T he appe llate timetable do es n ot commence to run other than by signe d, written order , even when the signing of such an or der is pure ly

minist eria l.”). This appea l is dism issed for lac k of jurisdiction.
September 14, 2011 DAVID WEL L I NGTONCHEW, C hief Just ice B e f o r e C h e w , C
. J. , M c C l ur e , a n d R i v e r a , JJ.
No. II-10-040 May 24, 2010 

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416 

NRC SCHEDULES MEETING TO DISCUSS AUGMENTED INSPECTION 

RESULTS FOR ROBINSON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a meeting in Hartsville, S.C. to 

discuss the results of an augmented inspection of a March 28 reactor shutdown and two fires in 

the plant’s electrical systems at the Robinson nuclear plant. 

The meeting, scheduled for 1 p.m. on Wednesday, June 2 in the Daniels Boardroom at 

the Coker College Library, 300 E. College Ave. in Hartsville, will be open to members of the 

public and the news media. NRC team members will also be available to answer questions after 

the results are presented. A telephone conference bridge line has also been established for 

anyone who may wish to listen to the meeting but cannot attend. That telephone connection can 

be accessed by dialing 888-455-7857 and entering the pass code 41484#. 

The NRC originally dispatched a three-person special inspection team to the Robinson 

plant, but further review pointed to the need for additional inspection. 

 

An Augmented Inspection Team (AIT) is formed by the NRC to review more significant 

events or issues at NRC-licensed facilities, and the Robinson AIT included members of the 

original special inspection team as well as five additional inspectors. The AIT was led by NRC 

Region II Branch Chief Bob Haag, who will lead the discussion of the team’s findings. 

The NRC will issue a written report of the AIT review in the next several weeks and that 

report will be available on the NRC’s web site at www.nrc.gov . 

###

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

245 Peachtree Center Ave. NE, Suite 1200 

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
Filed by Automated Filing Services Inc. (604) 609-0244 - Teryl Resources Corp. - Exhibit 4.5







Exhibit 4.5 

AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 5, 2002 

THIS AMENDMENT AGREEMENT is dated for reference the 4th
  day of November, 2002. 

BETWEEN: 

LINUXWIZARDRY SYSTEMS, INC. 

  #1103 - 11871 Horseshoe Way 

  Richmond, BC V7A 5H5 

  ("Linux") 

OF THE FIRST PART 

AND: 

TERYL RESOURCES CORP. 

  #1103 - 11871 Horseshoe Way 

  Richmond, BC V7A 5H5 

("Teryl") 

OF THE SECOND PART 

WHEREAS: 


	A. 	 Linux optioned their 50% interest in
        the Fish Creek Claims for 200,000 shares of Teryl Resources Corp. and
        expenditures of $500,000 U.S. over a three-year period.



NOW THEREFORE in consideration of the mutual covenants
  and conditions set forth herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 

	1. 	 Linux agrees that in consideration for
        receiving a mining lease that was not disclosed to Linux at the time of
        the March 5th, 2002 Agreement (the “Original Agreement”)
        both parties agree to grant Linux a back in working interest for a 25%
        interest in the mining lease after Teryl completes the $500,000 expenditures.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed
  this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. 

	LINUXWIZARDRY SYSTEMS, INC. 	 	TERYL RESOURCES CORP. 
	  	 	  
	  	 	  
	/s/
      John Robertson 	 	/s/
      John Robertson 
	Signature 	 	Signature 
	  	 	  
	John
      Robertson 	 	John Robertson 
	Print Name 	 	Print Name 
	  	 	  
	President
      	 	President 
	Title 	 	Title
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T17:49:14-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
Exhibit 10.20

SUMMARY OF THE COMPANY'S NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Non-employee directors are paid $2,000 for each Board meeting attended in person, $1,000 per Board meeting conducted by
telephone, $1,500 for each Audit Committee meeting attended, whether in person or by phone, $1,000 for each Compensation Committee, Nominating Committee or Special Committee meeting attended in person
and $500 for each Compensation Committee, Nominating Committee or Special Committee meeting conducted by telephone. In addition, the Chairman of the Audit Committee is paid an additional fee of $8,000
per year and the Chairman of the Compensation Committee is paid an additional fee of $4,000 per year for their services as such. All directors are reimbursed for their reasonable expenses related to
attendance at meetings.

In
accordance with the Company's 2000 Director Stock Option Plan, any non-employee director first elected to the Board will receive a stock option award of 50,000 shares.
Each year, as of the date of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, each non-employee director will receive a stock option award of 15,000 shares.

---



QuickLinks
No. II-09-016 March 25, 2009 

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 562-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 562-4416 

NRC TO DISCUSS 2008 PERFORMANCE OF 

NORTH ANNA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a meeting for Tuesday, 

April 7, with representatives of Dominion to discuss the agency’s assessment of safety 

performance during 2008 at the North Anna nuclear power plant. The plant, operated by 

Dominion, is on Lake Anna about 40 miles northwest of Richmond, Va. 

The meeting, which will be open to the public, is scheduled to begin at 6 p.m. in the 

North Anna Nuclear Information Center Main Auditorium. The center is located on the North 

Anna plant site, 1022 Haley Drive in Mineral, Va. 

After the formal presentation, NRC staff will be available to answer questions on the 

safety performance of the North Anna plant, as well as the NRC role in ensuring safe plant 

operation. 

“Throughout the year, we inspect and review the performance of the North Anna plant 

and all commercial nuclear plants,” NRC Region II Administrator Luis Reyes said. “We issue 

several inspection reports during the year and an overall annual assessment. This meeting allows 

us to discuss that assessment with the company, local officials and people near the plant.” 

A letter sent from the NRC Region II office to plant officials addresses the performance 

of the plant during 2008 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on 

the NRC web site at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/na_2008q4.pdf . 

The NRC found that North Anna’s 2008 performance met all NRC safety objectives. 

This year, the NRC plans to continue conducting the very detailed inspections required at those 

plants operating well. In addition, the agency will complete some generic inspections, such as 

spent fuel storage and operator licensing exams, at the North Anna plant in 2009. 

 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov 
Current performance information for North Anna Unit 1 is available on the NRC web site 

at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/NA1/na1_chart.html. Current performance 

information for Unit 2 is at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/NA2/na2_chart.html. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 4 (Monday, January 7, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63-64]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-28483]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER19-666-000]


Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based Rate Filing 
Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization: FirstLight CT 
Hydro LLC

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
FirstLight CT Hydro LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and

[[Page 64]]

assumptions of liability, is January 15, 2019.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an 
eSubscription link on the website that enables subscribers to receive 
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). 
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#763033243539181a1f181325030606190402361013041558111900"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fcbab9aebfb39290959299af898c8c938e88bc9a998e9fd29b938a">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: December 26, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-28483 Filed 1-4-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2409 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2409

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to clarify that inpatient 
  drug prices charged to certain public hospitals are included in the 
      best price exemptions for the Medicaid drug rebate program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 10, 2003

   Mr. Shadegg (for himself, Mr. Norwood, Mr. Markey, and Mr. Towns) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to clarify that inpatient 
  drug prices charged to certain public hospitals are included in the 
      best price exemptions for the Medicaid drug rebate program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safety Net Hospital Pharmacy Access 
Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY.

    The constitutional authority upon which this Act rests is the power 
of the Congress to regulate commerce with foreign nations and among the 
several States, set forth in section 8 of article I of the Constitution 
of the United States.

SEC. 3. CLARIFICATION OF INCLUSION OF INPATIENT DRUG PRICES CHARGED TO 
              CERTAIN PUBLIC HOSPITALS IN THE BEST PRICE EXEMPTIONS FOR 
              THE MEDICAID DRUG REBATE PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 1927(c)(1)(C)(i)(I) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r-8(c)(1)(C)(i)(I)) is amended by inserting before 
the semicolon the following: ``(including inpatient prices charged to 
hospitals described in section 340B(a)(4)(L) of the Public Health 
Service Act)''.
    (b) Anti-Diversion Protection.--Section 1927(c)(1)(C) of such Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1396r-8(c)(1)(C)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
                            ``(iii) Application of auditing and 
                        recordkeeping requirements.--With respect to a 
                        covered entity described in section 
                        340B(a)(4)(L) of the Public Health Service Act, 
                        any drug purchased for inpatient use shall be 
                        subject to the auditing and recordkeeping 
                        requirements described in section 340B(a)(5)(C) 
                        of the Public Health Service Act.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section take 
effect on October 1, 2003.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 700.90 Protection against claims.

A person shall not be held liable for damages or penalties for any act or failure to act resulting directly or indirectly from compliance with any provision of this part, or an official action, notwithstanding that such provision or action shall subsequently be declared invalid by judicial or other competent authority.

[49 FR 30414, July 30, 1984. Redesignated at 54 FR 601, Jan. 9, 1989, as amended at 79 FR 47571, Aug. 14, 2014]
##### 



Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    

    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Jeanne T. PraytherName:
    Jeanne T. PraytherTitle:
    Chief Accounting OfficerDate:
    May 17, 2007
EXHIBIT 32.1











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS.1350


AND EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(b)











Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350 and Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), I, the undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer of Visteon Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











_ /s/Timothy D. Leuliette __


Timothy D. Leuliette





June 28, 2013
REMARKS OF NRC CHAIRMAN GREGORY B. JACZKO AT 

COMMISSION MEETING ON REACTOR CONTAINMENT SUMP PERFORMANCE 

Good afternoon. The Commission meets today to discuss how to achieve closure on 

Generic Safety Issue-191 (GSI-191) – a long-standing safety issue regarding sump performance. 

The Commission last met to discuss this issue in April. From that meeting, the Commission 

asked the staff to provide a policy paper laying out several options on how to move forward 

towards resolving this issue. With the staff’s high-quality work on the paper, the independent and 

informative input from the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards, and the time we’ve had 

over the last few months to examine the questions around this issue, the Commission is now in a 

strong position to establish a clear strategy for closing out GSI-191. 

As you know, the agency has been grappling with this issue for quite some time now. As 

the ACRS very colorfully described in its comments on the staff paper, the “Resolution of GSI191 has proven to be a Herculean task – hydra-like in that whenever an issue was thought to be 

closed, two more emerged.” This is an example of the quintessential safety issues that are at the 

heart of our mission. It is critical that the Commission provide clear direction to the staff on how 

to resolve this issue in a timely manner. 

Note: Briefing slides for this meeting are available at http://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/doc-collections/commission/slides/2010/20100929/. A full transcript of the meeting will be 

available soon at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/commission/tr/2010/. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-171 September 29, 2010