alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC’s Rulemaking 

Process

Keith McDaniel

Division of Intergovernmental Liaison

and Rulemaking

September 18, 2009
Regulatory Process

• Rulemaking• Licensing• Inspection & Enforcement
What is Rulemaking?

• A process federal agencies use for develo

regulations

• NRC regulations impose requirements tha

applicants and licensees must meet to usnuclear material or operate a nuclear facil
NRC Rulemaking 

Authority

• Atomic Energy Act -1954 (AEA)• Administrative Procedure Act - 1946 

(APA)
Stakeholder Involvement in the 

Rulemaking Process

Identify 

need for 

rulemaking

Regulatory 

Basis 

(Technical 

Basis)

Proposed

Rule 

(~ 1yr)

Opportunities for public participation may include:• Public meetings and 

workshops.

• Opportunities to comment on 

draft documents such as regulatory basis, issue papers, etc..

• Public comments are important 

and will be considered in the development of the regulatory basis.

• APA requires Proposed Rule 

to be published in the Federal Register.

• Solicit stakeholder comment on the 

Proposed Rule, the Regulatory Analysis, the Information Collection burden, and the Environmental Assessment.

• May include opportunities to comment 

on draft guidance documents.

• May include public meetings.• Normal public comment 

period is 75 days.

• • 

Opportunities for public participation.

Pre-RulemakinRulemaking Ac

Triggering events include:• Petition for rulemaking 

from public (Notice of receipt published in Federal Register requesting for comments).

• Congressional 

mandate/Executive Branch Order.

• NRC Initiated.
§ 29.3 Public petition for withdrawal or modification. ( a ) The public may petition for withdrawal or modification of a particular guidance document by submitting such petition through the designated website: Department of Commerce: *www.commerce.gov/guidance*; Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA): *www.bea.gov/guidance*; Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS): *www.bis.doc.gov/guidance*; U.S. Census Bureau: *www.census.gov/guidance*; Economic Development Administration: *www.eda.gov/guidance*; International Trade Administration (ITA): *www.trade.gov/guidance*; Minority Business Development Agency (MBDA): *www.mbda.gov/guidance*; National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST): *www.nist.gov/guidance*; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA): *www.noaa.gov/guidance*; National Technical Information Service (NTIS): *www.ntis.gov/guidance*; National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA): *www.ntia.doc.gov/guidance*; and U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO): *www.uspto.gov/guidance .*
( b ) The Department or the relevant individual bureau will provide a response to such petition within 90 days of receipt of the petition.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marco Community Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, E. Terry Skone, Acting Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of and for the period covered by the Report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                                   
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------
|Date: September 27, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ E. Terry Skone                
|                         |  |  |  |     |  | E. Terry Skone                    
|                         |  |  |  |     |  | Acting Principal Financial Officer
### §170308. Restrictions

(a) Stock and Dividends.—The corporation may not issue stock or declare or pay a dividend.

(b) Political Activities.—The corporation or a director or officer as such may not contribute to, support, or participate in any political activity or in any manner attempt to influence legislation.

(c) Distribution of Income or Assets.—The income or assets of the corporation may not inure to the benefit of, or be distributed to, a director, officer, or member during the life of the charter granted by this chapter or on dissolution or final liquidation of the corporation. This subsection does not prevent the payment of compensation to an officer or reimbursement for actual necessary expenses in amounts approved by the board of directors.

(d) Loans.—The corporation may not make a loan to a director, officer, or employee.

(e) Claim of Governmental Approval or Authorization.—The corporation may not claim congressional approval or the authority of the United States Government for any of its activities.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1443.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 170308(a) | 36:3608(c). | Oct. 7, 1985, Pub. L. 99–119, §8, 99 Stat. 499. |
| 170308(b) | 36:3608(d). | |
| 170308(c) | 36:3608(a). | |
| 170308(d) | 36:3608(b). | |
| 170308(e) | 36:3608(e). | |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "any shares of" are omitted as unnecessary.

In subsection (b), the words "as such" are substituted for "acting as such" for consistency in the revised title.

In subsection (c), the words "inure to the benefit of" are substituted for "inure to", and the words "rendered to the corporation" are omitted, for consistency in the revised title.
#### Frank B. Goodliffe, Respondent, v. E. Nelson Ehrhart, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
§ 13.7 Communication with state and local officials concerning the Department's programs and activities. ( a ) For those programs and activities covered by a state process under § 13.6, the Secretary, to the extent permitted by law: ( 1 ) Uses the state process to determine views of state and local elected officials; and,
( 2 ) Communicates with state and local elected officials, through the state process, as early in a program planning cycle as is reasonably feasible to explain specific plans and actions.
( b ) The Secretary provides notice to directly affected state, areawide, regional, and local entities in a state of proposed Federal financial assistance or direct Federal development if: ( 1 ) The state has not adopted a process under the Order; or
( 2 ) The assistance or development involves a program or activity not selected for the state process. This notice may be made by publication in the Federal Register or other appropriate means, which the Department in its discretion deems appropriate.
#### § 705.1 Definitions.

As used in this part:

*Department* means the United States Department of Commerce and includes the Secretary of Commerce and the Secretary's designees.

*Secretary* means the Secretary of Commerce or the Secretary's designees.

*Applicant* means the person or entity submitting a request or application for an investigation pursuant to this part.
#### § 325.17 Waiver.

The Secretary may waive any of the provisions of this part in writing for good cause shown, if the Attorney General concurs and if permitted by law.
§ 890.205 Nonrenewal of contracts of health benefits plans. ( a ) Either OPM or the carrier may terminate a contract by giving a written notice of nonrenewal which includes an indication of the reason for the intended action.
( b ) Where termination by notice of intent not to renew is made by OPM, the carrier contesting that notice may request that OPM review the proposed decision. Such review shall be conducted by the Director or a representative designated by the Director, who shall not otherwise have been a party to the initial decision to issue a notice of intent not to renew. A request for such review, which may include a request that a representative of the carrier appear personally before OPM, shall be in writing. That request must be received within 10 calendar days of the carrier's receipt of the notice of intent not to renew. Such request shall include a detailed statement as to why the carrier disagrees with OPM's notice of nonrenewal and shall be accompanied by appropriate supporting documentation. Where a carrier has requested review under this section, the final decision by OPM not to renew a health benefits contract shall be communicated to the carrier in writing not more than 30 days after OPM's receipt of the carrier's request for review, unless a later date is mutually agreed upon.
( c ) In the absence of a timely request for review as set forth in paragraph (b) of this section, OPM's notice of intent not to renew will become final without further notification.
[57 FR 19374, May 6, 1992]
§ 9301.10 Other charges. SIGAR may apply other charges, including the following: ( a ) *Special charges.* SIGAR shall recover the full cost of providing special services, such as sending records by an overnight delivery service, to the extent that SIGAR elects to provide them.
( b ) *Interest charges.* SIGAR may begin assessing interest charges on an unpaid bill starting on the 31st day following the day on which the FOIA Officer sent the billing. Interest shall be charged at the rate prescribed in 31 U.S.C. 3717 and will accrue from the date of billing.
( c ) *Aggregating requests.* When the FOIA Officer reasonably believes that a requester or a group of requesters acting in concert is attempting to divide a request into a series of requests within a 30-day period for the purpose of avoiding fees, the FOIA Officer shall aggregate those requests and charge accordingly.
[77 FR 34180, June 11, 2012, as amended at 77 FR 38172, June 27, 2012]
### §20108. Records and inspection

(a) Records.—The corporation shall keep—

(1) correct and complete records of account;

(2) minutes of the proceedings of its members, board of governors, and committees having any of the authority of its board of governors; and

(3) at its principal office, a record of the names and addresses of its members entitled to vote.

(b) Inspection.—A member entitled to vote, or an agent or attorney of the member, may inspect the records of the corporation for any proper purpose, at any reasonable time.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1286.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20108(a) | 36:983 (1st sentence). | Aug. 31, 1960, Pub. L. 86–680, §13, 74 Stat. 576. |
| 20108(b) | 36:983 (last sentence). | |

Section

The word "records" is substituted for "books and records" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code.
### §8304. Disposition of property

If the Secretary receives any property other than moneys as contemplated by this chapter, the Secretary is authorized in the Secretary's discretion to sell, assign, transfer, and convey the same, or any interest therein claimed by virtue of such devise, bequest, or gift, for such price and upon such terms as the Secretary deems advantageous (including consent to partition of realty and compromise of contested claim of title) and the Secretary's assignment, deed, or other conveyance of any such property, executed in the name and on behalf of the United States, shall be valid to pass to the purchaser thereof such title to said property as the United States, beneficially or as trustee of the General Post Fund, may have by virtue of any such devise, bequest, or gift, and the proceedings incident thereto, subject to the conditions, limitations, and provisions of the instruments so executed by the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1255, §5104; Pub. L. 99–576, title VII, §701(92), Oct. 28, 1986, 100 Stat. 3299; renumbered §8304, Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §402(b)(1), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 238; Pub. L. 102–83, §4(b)(1), (2)(E), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 404, 405.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–40 renumbered section 5104 of this title as this section.

Pub. L. 102–83 substituted "Secretary" for "Administrator" and "Secretary's" for "Administrator's" wherever appearing.

1986—Pub. L. 99–576 substituted "the Administrator" for "he" in two places, and "the Administrator's" for "his" in two places.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2452 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2452

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 339 Hicksville Road in Bethpage, New York, as the ``Brian C. Hickey 
                        Post Office Building''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2452

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 339 Hicksville Road in Bethpage, New York, as the ``Brian C. Hickey 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 339 
Hicksville Road in Bethpage, New York, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Brian C. Hickey Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Brian C. Hickey Post Office 
Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 8, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

FEB 6 2002

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

JOHN KASEL; Y. G. ARIAS,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE

ENGINEERS, an unincorporated labor

organization; LOCAL UNION NO.

103 BROTHERHOOD OF

LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS, an

unincorporated labor organization;

LOCAL UNION NO. 451

BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE

ENGINEERS, an unincorporated labor

organization; DIVISION 29

BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE

ENGINEERS, an unincorporated labor

organization; UNION PACIFIC

RAILROAD COMPANY, a Delaware

corporation; and JOHN DOES 1-10,

individuals,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-1088

(D.C. No. 99-M-859)

(D. Colo.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
**

 Honorable John R. Gibson, Circuit Judge, United States Court of

Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.

- 2 -

Before EBEL, GIBSON**, and PORFILIO, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiffs-Appellants John Kasel and Y.G. Arias are engineers with Union

Pacific Railroad Company (“UP”) and members of the Brotherhood of

Locomotive Engineers (“BLE”) who were displaced as a result of the UPSouthern Pacific merger. They have brought claims for breach of contract and

promissory estoppel against UP and claims for breach of the duty of fair

representation against BLE. Appellants claim that UP violated a commitment

made to the BLE negotiators that Appellants would keep the new Long Pool turns

to which they were assigned after the merger unless there was a significant

decrease in business. Appellants also contend that UP violated commitments that

their vacation rights would be recognized based on their pre-merger seniority, and

that they would be entitled to bump to Fireman positions in the event that they

were displaced from their Long Pool positions. 

The district court ruled that it lacked jurisdiction over Appellants’ claims

against UP because the claims were subject to mandatory arbitration pursuant to

the New York Dock conditions agreed to by UP when it sought the Surface

Transportation Board’s approval of the merger. See New York Dock Ry.-ControlBrooklyn Eastern Dist., 360 I.C.C. 60, 84-90 (1979). The district court also ruled
- 3 -

that Appellants’ claims against BLE were time-barred, and that the record did not

support a finding that BLE breached its duty of fair representation. Accordingly,

the district court granted summary judgment to UP and BLE and dismissed

Appellants’ suit.

Appellants challenge each of the district court’s rulings. After reviewing

the briefs and record in this case, we agree with the district court’s conclusions. 

For substantially the reasons set forth in the district court’s opinion, we AFFIRM. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

David M. Ebel

Circuit Judge
#### § 265.17 Parking permits.

No person, except visitors, shall park a motor vehicle on the site without having a valid parking permit displayed on such motor vehicle in compliance with instructions of the issuing authority. Such permits may be revoked by the issuing authority for violation of any of the provisions of this part.
#### Paul M. Allo, Respondent, v. Vitall Benguiat, Appellant, Impleaded with Another.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
# L_2023049EN.01004401.xml

| 16.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 49/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 49/44

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 20/2020

of 7 February 2020

amending Annex IX (Financial Services) to the EEA Agreement [2023/298]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EU) 2019/2089 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 amending Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 as regards EU Climate Transition Benchmarks, EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks and sustainability-related disclosures for benchmarks (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EU) 2019/2089 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 amending Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 as regards EU Climate Transition Benchmarks, EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks and sustainability-related disclosures for benchmarks (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex IX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex IX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 31l (Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex IX to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32019 R 2089: Regulation (EU) 2019/2089 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 (OJ L 317, 9.12.2019, p. 17).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32019 R 2089: Regulation (EU) 2019/2089 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 (OJ L 317, 9.12.2019, p. 17).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) 2019/2089 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following the last notification under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 7 February 2020.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Clara GANSLANDT

---

(1)  
  OJ L 317, 9.12.2019, p. 17.

1

(*1)  Constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2008-7068 

EDGAR L. KNIGHT, 

Claimant-Appellant, 

v. 

JAMES B. PEAKE, M.D., Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 

Respondent-Appellee. 

William F. Fox, Jr., Purcell & Fox, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for claimantappellant. Of counsel was Robert W. Legg, Law Office of Robert W. Legg, of Arlington, 

Virginia. 

John J. Todor, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United 

States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. 

With him on the brief were Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. 

Davidson, Director, and Martin F. Hockey, Jr., Assistant Director. Of counsel on the 

brief were Michael J. Timinski, Deputy Assistant General Counsel, and Y. Ken Lee, 

Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, 

of Washington, DC. 

Appeal from: United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims 

Judge William A. Moorman 
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

 2008-7068 

EDGAR L. KNIGHT, 

 Claimant-Appellant, 

v. 

JAMES B. PEAKE, M.D., Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 

 Respondent-Appellant. 

 Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims 

in CASE NO(S). 06-0151 

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Per Curiam (NEWMAN, PLAGER, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges). 

 AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

DATED November 25, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
**Exhibit
      13.1**




Certification




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to




Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C.
      §§ 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an
      officer of Global Sources Ltd. (the “Company”) that the Annual Report of the
      Company on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company at the end of and for the periods covered by such
      Report.




Dated:
      June 28, 2007






/s/  Merle
      A. Hinrichs


Merle
      A.
      Hinrichs


Director,
      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer




The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 1350(a) and
      (b)), is not a part of the Form 20-F to which it refers and is, to the extent
      permitted by law, provided by the above signatory to the extent of his
      knowledge.




**A
      SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
      PROVIDED TO GLOBAL SOURCES LTD. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY GLOBAL SOURCES. AND
      FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON
      REQUEST.**