alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 222 (Thursday, November 18, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 67596]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25583]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Deafness and Other 
Communications Disorders Special Emphasis Panel, Intraneural 
Auditory Prosthesis Stimulating Electrode Array.
    Date: December 15, 2004.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6120 Executive Blvd., 
Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Da-yu Wu, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, 
Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, NIDCD, 
NIH, 6120 Executive Blvd., Suite 400C, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-
8683, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b7c0c2d3cef7d9ded3d4d399d9dedf99d0d8c1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="077072637e47696e63646329696e6f29606871">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, 
Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 10, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-25583 Filed 11-17-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS.1350

AND EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(b)

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350 and Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act), I, the undersigned Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Visteon Corporation (the Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company
for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      
|----------------------
|/s/ Jeffrey M. Stafeil
|Jeffrey M. Stafeil    
|                      
|April 30, 2015
§ 950.201 Charity eligibility. ( a ) The Director shall annually: ( 1 ) Determine the timetable and other procedures regarding application for inclusion in the Charity List; and
( 2 ) Determine which organizations among those that apply qualify to be included in the National/International, International and Local parts of the Charity List. In order to determine whether an organization may participate in the campaign, the Director may request evidence of corrective action regarding any prior violation of regulation or directive, sanction, or penalty, as appropriate. The Director retains the ultimate authority to decide whether the organization has demonstrated, to the Director's satisfaction, that the organization has taken appropriate corrective action. Failure to demonstrate satisfactory corrective action or to respond to the Director's request for information within 10 business days of the date of the request may result in a determination that the organization will not be included in the Charity List.
( b ) The Charity List will include each organization's CFC code and other information as determined by OPM.
( c ) A charity must submit the full application the initial year it applies to participate in the CFC. In lieu of a full application, a charity may submit a verification application for the two years immediately following its submission of a full application. ( 1 ) A verification application consists of certification of all applicable statements required by §§ 950.202 and 950.203, and submission of an IRS Form 990 or pro forma IRS Form 990, as defined in § 950.203(a)(3).
( 2 ) An organization that did not apply or was not approved for participation in the preceding campaign must submit a full application.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 16, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 67052]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25417]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2004-19333; Airspace Docket No. 04-ACE-62]


Modification of Class E Airspace; Warrensburg, MO

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; request for comments; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action corrects a direct final rule; request for comments 
that was published in the Federal Register on Friday, October 29, 2004, 
(69 FR 63063) (FR Doc. 04-24260). It corrects an error in the legal 
description of the Class E airspace area extending upward from 700 feet 
above the surface at Warrensburg, MO.

DATES: This direct final rule is effective on 0901 UTC, January 20, 
2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda Mumper, Air Traffic Division, 
Airspace Branch, ACE-520A, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal 
Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone 
(816) 329-2524.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History

    Federal Register document 04-24260, published on Friday, October 
29, 2004, (69 FR 63063) modified the Class E airspace area extending 
upward from 700 feet above the surface at Warrensburg, MO. The 
modification corrected a discrepancy in the Skyhaven Airport airport 
reference point used in the legal description, enlarged the airspace 
dimensions to protect for diverse departures, deleted an extension to 
the airspace area and brought the legal description of the Warrensburg, 
MO Class E airspace area into compliance with FAA Orders 7400.2E, 
Procedures for Handling Airspace Matters, and 8260.19C, Flight 
Procedures and Airspace. However, expansion of the Warrensburg, MO 
Class E airspace area created an overlapping of the Knob Noster, MO 
Class D airspace area. No provision was made in the Warrensburg, MO 
Class E airspace area legal description for this situation.
    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the legal 
description of the Class E airspace area extending upward from 700 feet 
above the surface at Warrensburg, MO, as published in the Federal 
Register on Friday, October 29, 2004, (69 FR 63063) (FR Doc. 04-24260) 
is corrected as follows:


Sec.  71.1  [Corrected]

0
On page 63064, Column 1, under the heading ``ACE MO E5 Warrensburg, 
MO'', correct the last line to read ``of Skyhaven Airport; excluding 
that airspace within the Knob Noster, MO Class D airspace area.''

    Issued in Kansas City, MO, on November 3, 2004.
Anthony D. Roetzel,
Acting Area Director, Western Flight Services Operations.
[FR Doc. 04-25417 Filed 11-15-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
§ 847.441 Election requirements. ( a ) An employee who completed a qualifying move under § 847.402(b) may elect to be covered by a NAFI retirement system for all Federal service following the qualifying move.
( b ) A survivor eligible for benefits under FERS may make an election under this section if the employee was otherwise eligible to make an election, but died before expiration of the time limit under § 847.304.
Order entered May 21, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 00392 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF M .M.M. AND C.N.M., CH ILDREN On Appeal from the 301st Judicial District Co urt

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF - l7 - 09018



### O RDER This is an appeal involving the termination of appellant’s parental rights. Before the Court is appellant’s May 17, 2019 motion requesting a free copy of the record and an extension of tim e to file a brief. We GRANT the motion. We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send appellant a paper copy of the clerk’s record filed on April 4, 2019 and the reporter’s record filed on May 3, 2019. Appellant shall file his brief on the merits by June 12 , 2019

. /s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHN A. SCHNECK,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

DAVID E. YAMAMOTO, Chief

Executive Officer Sutter North Medical

Foundation,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 11-15893

D.C. No. 2:10-cv-03329-MCEDAD

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Morrison C. England, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 8, 2012** 

Before: ALARCÓN, BERZON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges. 

John A. Schneck appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action arising from his termination as a patient by

FILED

AUG 15 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-15893

Sutter North Medical Foundation. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. 

We review de novo, Caviness v. Horizon Cmty. Learning Ctr., Inc., 590 F.3d 806,

811-12 (9th Cir. 2010), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Schneck’s § 1983 action because

Schneck failed to allege facts sufficient to show that defendant was acting under

color of state law. See id. at 812, 815 (state action is a required element of a

§ 1983 claim, and mere fact that a private entity performs a function that serves the

public does not make its acts state action); Ascherman v. Presbyterian Hosp. of

Pac. Med. Ctr., Inc., 507 F.2d 1103, 1104-05 (9th Cir. 1974) (private hospital’s

receipt of public funds and tax exempt status as a charitable organization

insufficient to establish state action). 

Schneck’s contentions regarding judicial bias are unpersuasive. See Taylor

v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., 993 F.2d 710, 712 (9th Cir. 1993) (per curiam)

(adverse rulings alone are insufficient to demonstrate judicial bias).

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel; TEP-15: Microbiome and Cancer.                    

*Date:*                         February 27, 2019.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Cancer Institute, Shady Grove, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Room 1E030 Rockville, MD 20850 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Jeffrey E. DeClue, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer,  Research Technology and Contract Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Room 7W114, Bethesda, MD 20892-9750, 240-276-6371,                         *decluej@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 18, 2019.

Melanie J. Pantoja,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2019-00162 Filed 1-25-19; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 16, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 67112]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25337]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

Defense Science Board

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Munitions System 
Reliability will meet in closed session on November 22-23, 2004, at 
Eglin Air Force Base, Florida. This Task Force will review the efforts 
thus far to improve the reliability of munitions systems and identify 
additional steps to be taken to reduce the amount of unexploded 
ordnance resulting from munitions failures. The Task Force will: 
Conduct a methodologically sound assessment of the failure rates of 
U.S. munitions in actual combat use; review ongoing efforts to reduce 
the amount of unexploded ordnance resulting from munitions systems 
failures, and evaluate whether there are ways to improve or accelerate 
these efforts; and identify other feasible measures the U.S. can take 
to reduce the threat that failed munitions pose to friendly forces and 
noncombatants.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they 
affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these 
meetings, the Defense Science Board Task Force will: conduct a 
methodologically sound assessment of the failure rates of U.S. 
munitions in actual combat use; review ongoing efforts to reduce the 
amount of unexploded ordnance resulting from munitions systems 
failures, and evaluate whether there are ways to improve or accelerate 
these efforts; and identify other feasible measures the U.S. can take 
to reduce the threat that failed munitions pose to friendly forces and 
noncombatants.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. 2), it has been 
determined that these Defense Science Board Task Force meetings concern 
matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and that, accordingly, these 
meetings will be closed to the public.

    Dated: November 8, 2004.
Jeannette Owings-Ballard,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 04-25337 Filed 11-15-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
U.S
..DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF



### .GREAT LAKES AVIATION, LTD

FAA DOCKET No. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS FAA-2011-0672
ORDER OF DISMISSAL OnJune 30, 2011, the Federal AviationAdministration (hereinafter "Complainant") filed a Complaint. Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. (hereinafter "Respondent") had earlier requested a hearing. By letter dated October 18, 2012, Respondent filed a Withdrawal ofRequest for Hearing, citing settlement ofthe matter. 14 C.F.R. §·13.215 states: "Atany time before or during a hearing, an agency attorney

.may withdraw a complaint orparty may withdraw a request for a hearing withoutthe consent ofthe administrative lawjudge. Ifan agency attorney withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the answer, the administrative lawjudge shall dismiss the proceedings under this subpart with prejudice." WHEREFORE, the within filed Withdrawal ofRequest for Hearing having beenread and considered, itis ORDERED that: ·2
1. Respondent's Withdrawal ofRequest for Hearing is hereby GRANTED; and 2. This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

Attachments

- Service List

# {l;duJC.~~ Richard C. Goodwin

### ~ Administrative LawJudge-3-

SERVICE LIST 

### FDMS No. FAA-2011-0672 (Civil Penalty Action)

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY
. 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGCA30 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 ONE COPY 

### Timothy R. 

### Thornton, 

### Respondent's Counsel Briggs and Morgan, P.A. 2200 IDS Center 80 South 8th Street Minneapolis, MN 55402-2157 TEL: 612-977-8400 FAJ(: 612-977-8650 Kyle Lomazow, 

### Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Avenue, SW. Renton, W A 98057 TEL: 425-227-1847 FAJ(: 425-227-1007 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 Legal Assistant FAJ(: 202-366-7536

1 Service was by U.S. M:iit For service inperson orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., WilburWrightBuilding-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
B.C.D. 01-28 MAR 2 8 2001

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION 

Iowa Transfer Railway Company

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning the continuing

status of Iowa Transfer Railway Company (ITR), BA No. 4640, as an employer under

the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231, et seg.) (RRA) and the Railroad

Unemployment Insurance (45 U.S.C. § 351, et seg.) (RUIA). ITR was ruled to be an

employer under the RRA and RUIA effective December 27, 1905.

ITR last filed its annual report to the Board for calendar year 1994 wherein it reported

zero employees. According to Jeffrey A. Jenson, Assistant Director of Taxes,

Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (BN&SF), in his letter of

October 3, 2000, BN&SF has a 25% ownership interest in ITR but has no responsibility

for its administration. He further stated that, to his knowledge, ITR has not actively

operated as a railroad or had employees for several years. T. Scott Bannister, an

attorney, stated in his letter of February 2, 2001 that ITR has not conducted rail

operations for over six years, but that the exact date of cessation is not known. He

further stated that ITR has no railway equipment of any kind and that its only asset is a

real estate parcel in Des Moines, Iowa. Our research indicates an assessed land value

of that property in the amount of $17,900. Mr. Bannister stated that ITR has not been

formally dissolved as an Iowa corporation. Our investigation shows no activity for this

employer since it filed its report for calendar year 1994.

In view of the foregoing information, it is determined that Iowa Transfer Railway

Company ceased to be an employer under the RRA and RUIA as of the close of

business on December 31,1994, the last day of the last year in which it may have 

operated and for which it filed a report to the Board.

V. M. Speakman, Jr.

BA# 4640