alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS 

TO MEET JULY 8-10 IN ROCKVILLE, MD. 

 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards 

(ACRS) will hold a public meeting July 8-10 in Rockville, Md., to discuss several issues of 

current interest. Topics include: the license renewal application and associated final safety 

evaluation report for the Beaver Valley Power Station; guidance for closure of inspections, tests, 

analyses and acceptance criteria under NRC regulations for new reactors; applicability of the 

TRACE Code to analyze the stability of the Economic Simplified Boiling-Water Reactor design; 

and regulatory guidance for seismic qualification of electrical and mechanical equipment for 

nuclear power plants. 

 

 The ACRS advises the Commission, independently from the NRC staff, on safety issues 

related to the licensing and operation of nuclear power plants as well as those issues in the areas of 

health physics and radiation protection. 

 The meeting will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s Two White Flint North building, 

at 11545 Rockville Pike. Sessions on Wednesday, July 8 and Thursday, July 9 will run from 8:30 

a.m. to 7 p.m., and on Friday, July 10 from 8:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m.; portions of the meeting may be 

closed to discuss proprietary information, as well as organizational and personnel matters. 

 A complete agenda is available on the NRC’s Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/doc-collections/acrs/agenda/2009/. 

 Anyone with questions or those wishing to make public statements during the meeting 

should contact Girija Shukla, at (301) 415-6855. To pursue video conferencing services, contact 

Theron Brown, at (301) 415-8066. 

### 

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand. 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 09-114 June 22, 2009
### §7284. Fee for transcript of record

The Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims may fix a fee, not in excess of the fee authorized by law to be charged and collected therefor by the clerks of the district courts, for comparing, or for preparing and comparing, a transcript of the record of any proceeding before the Court, or for copying any record, entry, or other paper and the comparison and certification thereof.

(Added Pub. L. 100–687, div. A, title III, §301(a), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4118, §4084; renumbered §7284, Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §402(b)(1), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 238; amended Pub. L. 105–368, title V, §512(a)(1), Nov. 11, 1998, 112 Stat. 3341.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1998—Pub. L. 105–368 substituted "Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims" for "Court of Veterans Appeals".

1991—Pub. L. 102–40 renumbered section 4084 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1998 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 105–368 effective on first day of first month beginning more than 90 days after Nov. 11, 1998, see section 513 of Pub. L. 105–368, set out as a note under section 7251 of this title.
NRC SEEKS PUBLIC COMMENT ON ASSUMPTIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL 

STUDY OF EXTENDED STORAGE OF SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission seeks public comment on a report updating 

preliminary assumptions for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) the agency will develop 

to analyze the effects of storing spent nuclear fuel from the nation’s commercial power reactors 

for as much as 200 years.

The EIS will be part of the agency’s effort to update its Waste Confidence Decision and 

Rule, last updated in 2010. The report being made available for comment is an early effort to 

obtain public input about the general scope of the EIS before the NRC formally initiates the EIS 

“scoping” process. The EIS will include analyses of environmental impacts that are directly 

related to the long-term handling, storage and transportation of commercial spent fuel and highlevel waste.

The report discusses several storage scenarios, including at nuclear power plants, regional 

or centralized storage sites or a combination of storage and reprocessing of spent fuel. A key 

assumption is that extended storage would be managed under a regulatory program similar to 

current regulation of spent fuel. To analyze the impacts associated with the scenarios, the staff 

will develop generic, composite sites for each scenario, and these sites will account for a range of 

characteristics of actual reactor and storage sites. 

The report, entitled “Background and Preliminary Assumptions for an Environmental 

Impact Statement – Long-Term Waste Confidence Update,” was posted Jan. 3 on the NRC 

website. The report updates assumptions first laid out in SECY-11-0029, dated Feb. 28, 2011. 

As revised in 2010, the Waste Confidence Decision and Rule included the Commission’s 

confidence that spent fuel can be safely managed until it undergoes final disposition. At the same 

time, the Commission directed the staff to prepare a long-term update to the Waste Confidence 

Decision and Rule that would cover extended storage of spent fuel. This long-term update is to 

be informed by the analysis and conclusions of the EIS anticipated in the current report. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 12-001 January 3, 2012
Comments on the report may be filed by email to WCOutreach@nrc.gov or by U.S mail 

to Christine Pineda, Project Manager, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, 

Mailstop EBB-2B2, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.
#### § 50.50 Request for certification.

(a) Upon request, the Census Bureau certifies certain statistical materials (such as the population and housing unit counts of government entities, published tabulations, maps, and other documents). The Census Bureau charges customers a preset fee for this service according to the kind of certification requested (either an impressed document or an attestation) and the level of difficulty involved in compiling it (easy, moderate, or difficult, determined according to the resources expended) as well as the set cost of the data product (e.g., report or map) to be certified. Certification prices are shown in the following table:

Price by Type of Certification

| Product | Estimated price | Estimated time to complete (in hours) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Impress-easy | $70.00 | 1.5 |
| Impress-medium | 110.00 | 3 |
| Impress-difficult | 150.00 | 4.5 |
| Attestation-easy | 160.00 | 3 |
| Attestation-medium | 200.00 | 4.5 |
| Attestation-difficult | 240.00 | 6 |

(b) There are two forms of certification available: Impressed Documents and Attestation.

(1) *Impressed documents.* An impressed document is one that is certified by impressing the Census Bureau seal on the document itself. The Census Bureau act, Title 13, United States Code, Section 3, provides that the seal of the Census Bureau shall be affixed to all documents authenticated by the Census Bureau and that judicial notice shall be taken of the seal. This process attests that the document on which the seal is impressed is a true and accurate copy of a Census Bureau record.

(2) *Attestation.* Attestation is a more formal process of certification. It consists of a signed statement by a Census Bureau official that the document is authentic and produced or published by the agency, followed by a signed statement of another Census Bureau official witnessing the authority of the first.

(c) Requests for certification should be submitted on Form BC-1868(EF), Request for Official Certification, to the Census Bureau by fax, (301) 457-4714 or by e-mail, *[webmaster@census.gov](mailto:webmaster@census.gov).* Form BC-1868(EF) is available on the Census Bureau's Web site at: *<http://www.census.gov/mso/www/certification/>.* A letter request—without Form BC-1868(EF)—will be accepted only if it contains the information necessary to complete a Form BC-1868(EF). No certification request will be processed without payment of the required fee.

[[67 FR 54951](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/67-FR-54951), Aug. 27, 2002]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 16, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-11410

Conference Calendar

 

TERRY LEE OWENS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

COLE JETER, Warden, Federal Medical Center Fort Worth,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:04-CV-727

--------------------

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Terry Lee Owens, federal prisoner # 29251-077, appeals the

district court’s summary dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

petition, challenging his sentence for distributing 124.9 grams

of cocaine base. He argues that under Blakely v. Washington, 124

S. Ct. 2531 (2004), the district court erroneously based his

sentence on 2.86 kilograms of cocaine base and his role in the

offense. He argues that he qualifies for the savings clause of

28 U.S.C. § 2255 because he is actually innocent of the non-
No. 04-11410

-2-

existent offenses of (1) distributing 2.86 kilograms of cocaine

base and (2) the two-point enhancement for his role as a manager

or supervisor. He asserts that it would be inadequate and

ineffective for him to seek permission from this court via a

successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. See Wesson v. United States

Penitentiary, 305 F.3d 343, 347-48 (5th Cir. 2002).

Owens’s argument is unavailing in light of this court’s

decision in Padilla v. United States, F.3d , 2005 WL

1595291, *2 (5th Cir. July 8, 2005) (No. 04-50567). 

AFFIRMED.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2018189EN.01002301.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 26.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 189/23 |

---

DECISION No 60/2018 OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE ESTABLISHED UNDER THE AGREEMENT ON MUTUAL RECOGNITION BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

of 5 June 2018

related to the listing of Conformity Assessment Bodies under the Sectoral Annex for Electromagnetic Compatibility [2018/1056]

THE JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on Mutual Recognition between the European Community and the United States of America and in particular Article 7 and 14;

Whereas the Joint Committee is to take a decision to list a Conformity Assessment Body or Bodies under a Sectoral Annex;

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 1. | The Conformity Assessment Bodies in Attachment A are added to the list of Conformity Assessment Bodies under column ‘EC access to the US market’ in Section V of the Sectoral Annex for Electromagnetic Compatibility. |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2. | The specific scope of listing, in terms of products and conformity assessment procedures, of the Conformity Assessment Bodies indicated in Attachment A has been agreed by the Parties and will be maintained by them. |

This Decision, done in duplicate, shall be signed by representatives of the Joint Committee who are authorised to act on behalf of the Parties for purposes of amending the Agreement. This Decision shall be effective from the date of the later of these signatures.

On behalf of the United States of America

James C. SANFORD

Signed in Washington DC, on 30 May 2018

On behalf of the European Union

Ignacio IRUARRIZAGA

Signed in Brussels, on 5 June 2018

---

ATTACHMENT A

EC Conformity Assessment Bodies added to the list of Conformity Assessment Bodies under column ‘EC access to the US market’ in Section V of the Sectoral Annex for Electromagnetic Compatibility

| | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | --- | | dB Technology (Cambridge) Limited | | Radio Test Site | | Twentypence Road | | Cottenham | | Cambridge | | CB24 8PS | | UNITED KINGDOM | |

| | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | --- | | PRS LAB S.r.l. | | Via Campagna 92 | | 22020 Faloppio (CO) | | ITALY | |

---
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 219 (Monday, November 15, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 65579]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25246]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service


Notice of Proposed Change to the Natural Resources Conservation 
Service's National Handbook of Conservation Practices

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), U.S. Department 
of Agriculture, Maine State Office.

ACTION: Notice of availability of proposed changes in the NRCS National 
Handbook of Conservation Practices, Section IV of the Maine State NRCS 
Field Office Technical Guide (FOTG) located at http://www.me.nrcs.usda.gov under ``Draft Standards for Comments'' for review 
and comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: It is the intention of NRCS to issue revised conservation 
practice standards in its National Handbook of Conservation Practices. 
These revised standards are the following:
    314 Brush Management; 329 Residue Management, Ridge-Till; 340 Cover 
Crop; 342 Critical Area Planting; 344 Residue Management, Seasonal; 386 
Field Border; 511 Forage Harvest Management; 512 Pasture and Hay 
Planting; 528 Animal Trails and Walkways; 590 Nutrient Management; 557 
Row Arrangement.

DATES: Comments will be received for a 30-day period commencing with 
this date of publication.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Inquire in writing to Christopher R. 
Jones, State Resource Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation 
Service (NRCS), 967 Illinois Avenue, Suite <greek-i>3, Bangor, Maine 
04401.
    A copy of these standards are available from the above individual.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 343 of the Federal Agricultural 
Improvement and Reform Act of 1966 states that revisions made after 
enactment of the law to NRCS State Technical Guides used to carry out 
highly erodible land and wetland provisions of the law shall be made 
available for public review and comment. For the next 30 days the NRCS 
will receive comments relative to the proposed changes. Following that 
period a determination will be made by the NRCS regarding disposition 
of those comments and a final determination of change will be made.

    Dated: November 4, 2004.
Christopher R. Jones,
State Resource Conservationist.
[FR Doc. 04-25246 Filed 11-12-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Annual report of the UnitedStates Postal Service [electronic resource].**
 
2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009
2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019
2020 | 2021 | 2022
 
SuDoc Number:P 1.1:
Item Number:0835 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000562941
 
February 6, 2020
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 200 9-0 819

DCN: SE03869.A1

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS I NFORMATION

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
AMENDMENT 3 TO EXECUTIVE DEFERED COMPENSATION PLAN NO 1



 Exhibit 10. (k) 
  
 AMENDMENT THREE 
 TO 
 THE FLEETBOSTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION 
 EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN NO. 1 
 (1997 Restatement) 
  
 Section 2(c)(iv) of the Plan is amended effective December 16, 2003, to read
as follows: 
  
 (iv) Upon a termination of employment following
any of the events described in clauses (1) through (4) below, the Employee will receive retirement income (less applicable withholding) in fifteen annual installments commencing at age 65 (or, if later, commencing at retirement); provided, however,
that if the Employee has previously made (or, subject to the requirements of the Plan relating to the timing of distribution elections, makes) a valid election either to receive retirement income (less applicable withholding) as set forth in his or
her compensation deferral agreement in a lump sum payment as soon as practicable following termination of employment or to defer receipt to a specified date not later than age 65 (or, if later, commencing at retirement) and to receive such balance
in a series of up to fifteen annual installments, then the terms of such election shall control: (1) the termination of employment of an Employee with the Employer (or its subsidiary or affiliate) after attaining age 65; (2) the termination of
employment of an Employee (or its subsidiary or affiliate) after attaining age 55 and completing five years of continuous service with the Employer (or its subsidiary or affiliate); or (3) the designation by the Committee in its sole discretion that
an Employee shall be entitled to receive his or her balance as described above (regardless of the Employee’s age and years of service); or (4) a “change of control” as defined in the trust referred to in Section 7. If retirement
occurs before or after age 65, the amount of retirement income will be less or greater than the amount specified in the agreement but will be calculated as though the amount deferred had been credited with interest at 15 percent (10 percent for
Employees who become participants in the Plan on or after December 1, 1986 and prior to November 1, 1988 and 9 percent for Employees who become participants in the Plan on or after November 1, 1988). 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment Three was adopted by the Human Resources Committee at its December 16,
2003 meeting and is executed by a duly authorized officer of the Company on this 19th day of December, 2003.

  
  

			
	 FLEETBOSTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION

		
	 By:
	 	 /S/    M. ANNE SZOSTAK


	 	 	M. Anne Szostak
	 	 	 Executive Vice President and Director of Human Resources
#### CRAWFORD v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12144.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

June 8, 1954.

*314No attorney for appellant.

Millsaps Fitzhugh, U. S. Atty., Memphis, Tenn., for appellee.

Before ALLEN, MILLER and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This proceeding, brought under the provisions of Sec. 2255, Title 28 U.S. Code, to vacate the sentence heretofore imposed under Count 2 of the indictment on the ground that the offenses charged in Counts 1 and 2 of the indictment are but one and the same offense, was heard upon the record and briefs for the respective parties;

And the Court being of the opinion that the offense of transporting in interstate commerce a motor vehicle, knowing the same to have been stolen, as charged in Count 1 of the indictment, Sec. 2312, Title 18 U.S.Code, is a separate offense from the. offense of receiving or concealing a motor vehicle moving in interstate commerce, knowing the same to have been stolen, as charged in Count 2 of the indictment, Sec. 2313, Title 18 U.S.Code; Spradley v. United States, 6 Cir., 162 F.2d 203; York v. United States, 6 Cir., 299 F. 778; Record v. Hudspeth, 10 Cir., 126 F.2d 215, certiorari denied 316 U.S. 703, 62 S.Ct. 1310, 86 L.Ed. 1771;

And that the evidence sustains appellee’s contention that said two separate offenses were committed by the appellant ; Gavieres v. United States, 220 U.S. 338, 31 S.Ct. 421, 55 L.Ed. 489; Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 52 S.Ct. 180, 76 L.Ed. 306; Grabenheaimer v. United States, 6 Cir., 194 F.2d 447; Newman v. United States, 6 Cir., 212 F.2d 450.

It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court, dismissing the proceeding, be affirmed.
§ 2004.21 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This subpart implements the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a, a Federal law that requires Federal agencies to protect private information about individuals that the agencies collect or maintain. It establishes USTR's rules for access to records in systems of records we maintain that are retrieved by an individual's name or another personal identifier. It describes the procedures by which individuals may request access to records, request amendment or correction of those records, and request an accounting of disclosures of those records by USTR. Whenever it is appropriate to do so, USTR automatically processes a Privacy Act request for access to records under both the Privacy Act and the FOIA, following the rules contained in this subpart and subpart B of part 2004. USTR processes a request under both the Privacy Act and the FOIA so you will receive the maximum amount of information available to you by law.
( b ) This subpart does not entitle you to any service or to the disclosure of any record to which you are not entitled under the Privacy Act. It also does not, and may not be relied upon to create any substantive or procedural right or benefit enforceable against USTR.
Manager, Flight Standards Service

Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration Office

FAA Headquarters, Building 10A

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

Re: Request for Amendment to Exemption No. 11367 (Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 0072)

Attention: FAA UAS Integration Office

This is a request for an amendment to the existing Section 333 Exemption No. 11367 to add

additional aircraft to Texas UAV Professionals authorized c ommercial operations. On April 17 , 2015, the

FAA granted this Pet ition for Exemption to operate small unmanned aircraft systems for the purpose of

conducting inspections for utility and construction industries . The Petitioner now seeks an amendment

to its exemption authorizing the operation of additional aircraft as des cribed in the confidential and

proprietary operations manuals submitted in support of this amendment request.

Additional Aircraft:

TUP X8A

- 2100

- Manual sent separately to 333exemptions@faa.gov

TUP’s existing safety standards, maintenance, operational parameters and procedures outlined in our

Manual will continue for the additional aircraft.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you

shoul d have any questions.

Best regards,

Curtis Youngblood

Texas UAV Professionals

5205 Sycamore Hills Court

College Station, TX 77845

979

- 828

- 4269

Curtis@texasdr oneprofessionals.com