alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 05-052 April 13, 2006

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON NUCLEAR WASTE

TO MEET IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND, APRIL 18-30

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste (ACNW) will

meet April 18-20 in Rockville, Md., to receive updates on a number of studies concerning the proposed

geologic repository at Yucca Mountain; scheduled presenters include representatives from the

Department of Energy, the Electric Power Research Institute and Nye County, Nev. A presentation is

also scheduled on the National Academy of Sciences’ 2006 report on the transportation of high-level

nuclear waste. Among other items, the committee will also be briefed on a proposed rule on NRC

regulation of naturally occurring or accelerator-produced radioactive materials.

The committee reports to and advises the Commission on all aspects of nuclear waste

management.

The session on Tuesday will run from 10 a.m. to 6:15 p.m. and the session on Wednesday will

run from 8:30 a.m. to 6 p.m. The session on Thursday will run from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. The

meeting will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s Two White Flint North Building, at 11545

Rockville Pike.

Anyone wanting to use video teleconferencing to observe the meeting should contact Theron

Brown, at 301-415-8066 to ensure availability.

A complete agenda will be available on the NRC’s Web site at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acnw/agenda/2006/ . Individuals interested in making

statements or those seeking more information should contact Michael Snodderly, at 301-415-6927. 

###
§ 285.9 Granting accreditation. ( a ) The Chief of NVLAP is responsible for all NVLAP accreditation actions, including granting, denying, renewing, suspending, and revoking any NVLAP accreditation.
( b ) Initial accreditation is granted when a laboratory has met all NVLAP requirements. One of four accreditation renewal dates (January 1, April 1, July 1, or October 1) is assigned to the laboratory and is usually retained as long as the laboratory remains in the program. Initial accreditation is granted for a period of one year; accreditation expires and is renewable on the assigned date.
( c ) Renewal dates may be reassigned to provide benefits to the laboratory and/or NVLAP. If a renewal date is changed, the laboratory will be notified in writing of the change and any related adjustment in fees.
( d ) When accreditation is granted, NVLAP shall provide to the laboratory a Certificate of Accreditation and a Scope of Accreditation,
§ 919.1005 State. ( a ) *State* means— ( 1 ) Any of the states of the United States;
( 2 ) The District of Columbia;
( 3 ) The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico;
( 4 ) Any territory or possession of the United States; or
( 5 ) Any agency or instrumentality of a state.
( b ) For purposes of this part, *State* does not include institutions of higher education, hospitals, or units of local government.
#### Liuba B. Ragovis, Appellant, v. Joseph M. Ragovis, Respondent.

Under the circumstances disclosed herein we find that the order for temporary alimony should be modified so as to provide that the plaintiff receive the sum of $75 weekly, which sum had been agreed to by the parties in a recent separation agreement. The order for temporary alimony should be upon condition that the case be tried promptly. Upon the trial, the financial ability of the defendant may be more thoroughly inquired into than upon affidavits. (See Bleiman v. *Bleiman,*272 App. Div. 760.) Order unanimously modified accordingly and as so modified affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant. Settle order on notice. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10(t)

January 09, 2004

Dear Executive:

In the Change of Control Agreement entered into between you and EDO Corporation
in 2003, it states that the Agreement would expire as of December 31, 2003. It
goes on to state however, that the Agreement may be renewed each year by mutual
consent of the Company and the Executive by the issuance of a letter of
notification and agreement to that effect.

This letter is to advise that the Company does hereby extend the cancellation
date to December 31, 2004. (see page 2, General, item 2 and 3). All other terms
and conditions of the Agreement remain in place as presented in the above
referenced document.

Please sign both copies of this letter as an indication of your acceptance of
this extension of the time period the Agreement is in effect. Please return one
copy to me by January 31, 2004 and keep the other copy for your records.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.

                                                   S/ __________________________
                                                        James M. Smith, for
                                                        EDO Corporation

                                                   S/ __________________________
date:___________                                        ("Executive")
```

[House Report 107-351]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                    107-351

======================================================================
 
 PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF A JOINT RESOLUTION APPOINTING THE DAY 
  FOR THE CONVENING OF THE SECOND SESSION OF THE ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH 
                                CONGRESS

                                _______
                                

  December 20 (legislative day, December 19), 2001.--Referred to the 
                House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

Mr. Hastings of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the 
                               following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 322]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 322, by a non-record vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides for consideration in the House of a 
joint resolution appointing the day for the convening of the 
second session of the One Hundred Seventh Congress, under a 
closed rule.
    The resolution provides one hour of debate in the House 
equally divided and controlled by the Majority Leader and the 
Minority Leader of their designees. Finally, the rule provides 
one motion to recommit.

                                  

```
#### § 0.735-2 Cross-references to ethical conduct, financial disclosure, and other applicable regulations.

Employees of the Department of Commerce should refer to the executive branch-wide Standards of Ethical Conduct at 5 CFR part 2635 and the executive branch-wide financial disclosure regulations at 5 CFR part 2634.

[68 FR 24879, May 9, 2003]
### §17103. Commercial standards for passenger safety devices

The Administrator of General Services shall prescribe and publish in the Federal Register commercial standards for passenger safety devices the Administrator requires under section 17102 of this title. Changes in the standards take effect one year and 90 days after the publication of the standards in the Federal Register.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1279.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 17103 | 40:701 note. | Pub. L. 88–515, §§2, 4, Aug. 30, 1964, 78 Stat. 696. |
| | 40:702. | |

Section

The first sentence of section 4 of the Act of August 30, 1964, and 40:702 (last sentence) are omitted as executed.
BISNIS Trades & Tenders, January 19, 1999  

----

International Copyright, U.S. & Foreign Commercial Service and U.S. Department of State,1997.      All rights reserved outside of the United States.
The Business Information Service for the Newly Independent States (BISNIS) is the U.S.Department ofCommerce's information clearinghouse on trade and investment in the emerging markets of thenewlyindependent states of the former Soviet Union.  BISNIS has created the "BISNIS Trades &Tenders"electronic newsletter to help U.S.. companies find business opportunities in these expandingmarkets.
These opportunities are provided solely as an informational service and do not represent anendorsementby the U.S. Department of Commerce. Verification of leads is the responsibility of the reader.BISNISmay consider other private sector-generated trade leads and tenders, in electronic form only, andpublishon a space-available basis. 
Please send your leads to [email protected]
A full selection of BISNIS leads and other market intelligence is available via BISNIS OnLineat: www.mac.doc.gov/BISNIS
=====================================================================
#### § 705.9 Emergency action.

In emergency situations, or when in the judgment of the Department, national security interests require it, the Department may vary or dispense with any or all of the procedures set forth in § 705.7 of this part.
§ 831.1105 Answer; request for hearing. ( a ) The annuitant has 30 calendar days from the day he receives the notice within which to submit an answer and to request a hearing. The Associate Director may extend this time limit for good cause shown. If the annuitant answers, he shall specifically admit, deny, or explain each fact alleged in the notice, unless he states that he is without knowledge. If a hearing is desired, the annuitant must file a specific request therefor with or as a part of his answer.
( b ) An annuitant who fails to answer or to request a hearing within the time permitted under paragraph (a) of this section is considered to have waived his right to answer or to a hearing. If an annuitant neither answers nor requests a hearing within the time permitted, or answers but fails to request a hearing, the Associate Director shall decide the case on the basis of the administrative record, including the notice and any documents, affidavits, or other relevant evidence. The decision of the Associate Director shall ( 1 ) be served on the annuitant or his counsel by certified or registered mail;
( 2 ) include a statement of findings and conclusions with the reasons therefor; and
( 3 ) become the final decision of OPM unless the case is appealed or reviewed pursuant to § 831.1111.
[34 FR 17618, Oct. 31, 1969]
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2523 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 158
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2523

                          [Report No. 108-447]

To designate the United States courthouse located at 125 Bull Street in 
   Savannah, Georgia, as the ``Tomochichi United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 19, 2003

  Mr. Burns introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

                             March 25, 2004

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the United States courthouse located at 125 Bull Street in 
   Savannah, Georgia, as the ``Tomochichi United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 125 Bull Street in 
Savannah, Georgia, shall be known and designated as the ``Tomochichi 
United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Tomochichi 
United States Courthouse''.

                                                 House Calendar No. 158

108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2523

                          [Report No. 108-447]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse located at 125 Bull Street in 
   Savannah, Georgia, as the ``Tomochichi United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 25, 2004

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
The HONORABLE RICHARD H. KYLE, United States District Judge for the 1

District of Minnesota, sitting by designation.

The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern 2

District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-1093

___________

Ezekiel L. Lofton, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Arkansas.

Stant Manufacturing, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: June 10, 1998

 Filed: July 2, 1998 

___________

Before WOLLMAN and MURPHY, Circuit Judges, and KYLE, District Judge. 1

___________

PER CURIAM.

Ezekiel L. Lofton appeals from the district court’s grant of judgment as a matter 2

of law to Stant Manufacturing, Inc. on his claim that his employer unlawfully retaliated

against him for filing an employment discrimination charge in violation of Title VII, 42
-2-

U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a) and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. See Kim v. Nash Finch Co., 123 F.3d 1046,

1060 (8th Cir. 1997) (detailing elements of retaliation claim under both statutes).

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, we conclude that the judgment of the

district court was correct. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

The judgment is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 17 (Friday, January 25, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 370-371]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00159]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel; TEP--1C: SBIR Contract Review.
    Date: February 13, 2019.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Cancer Institute, Shady Grove, 9609 Medical 
Center Drive, Room 2W034, Rockville, MD 20850 (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Ivan Ding, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Program and Review Extramural Staff Training Office, Division of 
Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 9609 Medical 
Center Drive, Room 7W534, Bethesda, MD 20892-9750, 240-276-6444, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1d7974737a745d707c747133737475337a726b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6b0f02050c022b060a020745050203450c041d">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in 
advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of 
December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


[[Page 371]]


    Dated: January 18, 2019.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-00159 Filed 1-24-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 1, 2022

No. 04-22-00596-CR

EX PARTE Edwing Ricardo ALVARADO RODRIGUEZ

Appellant

From the County Court, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10500CR

Honorable Tully Shahan, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s brief is currently due on October 31, 2022. On October 26, 2022, appellant 

filed an unopposed motion requesting a sixty-day extension of time to file his brief. We GRANT 

the motion and ORDER appellant to file his brief by December 30, 2022. Further requests for 

extensions of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 1st day of November, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
#### DE FOE v. NATIONAL CAPITAL BANK.

No 11917

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued Feb. 8, 1954.

Decided March 25, 1954.

Eva p. DeFoe, appellant pro se.

■^•r- Arthur C. Elgin, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Arthur C. Keefer, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellee.

Before CLARK, FAHY and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In the District Court appellee, defendant ther6’ movedfor su“y ment against appellant on her complaint in that court. We construe this appeal to be from the order granting said motion. The compiaint is grounded upon alleged fraud of appellee in obtaining appellant’s endorsement upon a promissory note and also her signature to a praecipe authorizing the clerk of the Municipal Court for the District of Columbia to enter judgment.on the note, which was done. In the Municipal Court *226a hearing * and final decision were had on the same issues of fraud now attempted to be relitigated in *the*District Court, For this reason the motion for summary judgment was properly granted.

Affirmed.

*

 The hearing occurred on a motion for rehearing of a motion to vacate th¿-original judgment of the Municipal Court against appellant.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7570
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LENZIE LEE MURRAY, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CR-96-157) Submitted: December 16, 2002 Decided: December 23, 2002 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lenzie Lee Murray, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Lenzie Lee Murray, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion to Petition Unconstitutional Imposed Sentence Pursuant to Ring v. Arizona .” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning stated by the district court. See United States v. Murray , No. CR-96-157 (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 26, 2002 & entered Sept. 27, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# L_2023164EN.01003601.xml

| 29.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 164/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 164/36

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 310/2022

of 9 December 2022

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2023/1252]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/323 of 22 February 2022 on the unresolved objections regarding the conditions for granting an authorisation for the biocidal product Sojet in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/323 of 22 February 2022 on the unresolved objections regarding the conditions for granting an authorisation for the biocidal product Sojet in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 12zzzzzzzy (Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/1006) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘12zzzzzzzz. | 32022 D 0323: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/323 of 22 February 2022 on the unresolved objections regarding the conditions for granting an authorisation for the biocidal product Sojet in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 55, 28.2.2022, p. 51).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘12zzzzzzzz.

32022 D 0323: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/323 of 22 February 2022 on the unresolved objections regarding the conditions for granting an authorisation for the biocidal product Sojet in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 55, 28.2.2022, p. 51).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/323 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 10 December 2022, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 9 December 2022.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kristján Andri STEFÁNSSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 55, 28.2.2022, p. 51.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
ADB in Kyrgyzstan

----