alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC ACCEPTS APPLICATION FOR EARLY SITE PERMIT 

AT VICTORIA COUNTY SITE IN TEXAS 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has accepted for review the Early Site Permit (ESP) 

application for the Victoria County site near Victoria, Texas. 

The applicant, Exelon Nuclear Texas Holdings, submitted the application and associated 

information on March 25. The application, minus proprietary and security-related details, is 

available on the NRC Web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors/esp/victoria.html. 

Exelon’s ESP application seeks resolution of safety and environmental issues for the site, 

approximately 13 miles south of Victoria. Docketing the Victoria County application does not 

indicate whether the Commission will approve or reject the request. The NRC has established 

docket number 52-042 for this application, and the agency will subsequently publish a notice of 

opportunity to intervene in the required adjudicatory hearing. Petitions to intervene in a hearing 

may be filed within 60 days of the notice, by anyone whose interest may be affected by the 

proposed license and who wishes to participate as a party in the proceeding. More information on 

the hearing process is available on the NRC Web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/aboutnrc/regulatory/adjudicatory/hearing.html. 

More information about the new reactor licensing process is available on the NRC Web 

site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors.html. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-102 June 14, 2010
#### § 705.2 Purpose.

These regulations set forth the procedures by which the Department shall commence and conduct an investigation to determine the effect on the national security of the imports of any article. Based on this investigation, the Secretary shall make a report and recommendation to the President for action or inaction regarding an adjustment of the imports of the article.
No. II-11-005 February 1, 2011

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416

NRC TO INCREASE OVERSIGHT OF ROBINSON NUCLEAR PLANT 

The H.B. Robinson nuclear power plant will receive additional oversight from the Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission as the result of a series of NRC inspection findings and plant issues. The 

Robinson plant is located near Hartsville, S.C., and operated by Progress Energy.

The increased oversight is linked to three “white” inspection findings, which have low to 

moderate safety significance, and a “white” performance indicator. Two of the “white” findings are 

related to a March 28, 2010, shutdown and two fires in the facility’s electrical systems. The third 

“white” finding, which also was issued in 2010, stemmed from problems with an emergency diesel 

generator. In addition, the plant reported a “white” performance indicator for an excessive number 

of unplanned reactor shutdowns last year.

The two most recent “white” findings involved the failure to adequately implement certain 

procedures required during the event last March and the failure to develop operator training that 

would have provided complete guidance for actions required during those events. Those findings are 

violations of NRC requirements and Progress Energy is required to respond to those violations.

“Overall, the Robinson plant continues to operate safely,” said NRC Region II Administrator 

Victor McCree. “However, these findings point to performance issues and a trend that needs to be 

understood and addressed. The additional oversight by NRC is warranted based on the procedural 

and training shortcomings revealed by the March event.” 

The additional NRC inspections will provide assurance that the root causes of the 

performance issues are understood and corrective actions are sufficient to prevent recurrence. The 

additional inspections have not yet been scheduled.

The NRC evaluates inspection findings and performance indicators at commercial nuclear 

power plants with a color-coded system which classifies them as green, white, yellow or red, in

increasing order of safety significance. As the significance increases, the NRC heightens the level of 

oversight for that plant. If a plant takes appropriate corrective actions and improves safety 

performance, the agency returns to its normal, but still extensive, inspection schedule. 

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. 

E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave. NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov
#### In the Matter of Halton D. Bly et al., Respondents, against G. Robert Witmer et al., Comprising the Town Board of the Town of Webster, Appellants.

Present—Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# March 2011, Monthly Report on Part 2.206 Petitions.

Accession Number: ML111010071

Date Released: Thursday, April 21, 2011

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML111010032 - Cover Memo: March 2011 Report on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of The Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206. (3 page(s), 4/21/2011)
    - ML110970499 - Enclosures: March 2011, Monthly Report on Part 2.206 Petitions. (26 page(s), 4/21/2011)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
ACCEPTED

03-15-00498-CV

7405532

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

10/16/2015 10:06:18 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

NO. 03-15-00498-CV 

IN THE 

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS 

AT AUSTIN, TEXAS 

LONG CANYON PHASE II HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., 

Appellants, 

v. 

CHRIS CASHION AND LISA CASHION 

Appellees. 

Appealed from the County Court at Law. No.2 of 

Travis County, Texas 

Cause No. C-1CV-15-001016 

APPELLEE CHRIS AND LISA CASHION'S FIRST MOTION FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FIRST APPELLEE BRIEF 

TO THE HONORABLE COURT: 

Appellee Chris and Lisa Cashion, files this First Motion for Extension of 

Time to File Appellee's Brief pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 

38.6(d) and 10.5(b )(1) and would respectfully show unto the Court the following: 

1. The deadline for filing Appellee's Brief is Wednesday, October 21, 

2015. 

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/16/2015 10:06:18 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
2. Appellee seeks a 14-day extension of time to file Appellee's Brief. 

Appellee respectfully requests that the Court extend the deadline for filing 

Appellee's Brief to October 30, 2015. 

3. This is the first Motion for Extension of Time filed for Appellee's 

Brief with the Court. 

4. This extension of time is not requested for mere delay, but to allow 

Appellee adequate time to prepare Appellee's Brief. 

5. Appellee is requesting additional time in order to thoroughly research 

and adequately brief these matters for the Court. 

For these reasons, Appellee respectfully requests that this Court grant a 14~ 

day extension of time to file Appellee's Brief. Appellee also requests any further 

relief to which it may be entitled. 

2 

Respectfully submitted, 

CHAMBERLAIN MCHANEY 

301 Congress, 18th Floor (78701) 

P.O. Box 684158 

Austin, Texas 78768-4158 

(512) 474-9124 

(512) 474-8582 (Facsimile) 

bdavidson@chmc-law .com 

c " 

t. I ~ - E' .. \ 1.-_ By: vv.u,,,:\ I&,M. 

William C. Davidson 

SBN 0544 7000 

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE 
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE 

I hereby certify that on October 16, 2015, I conferred with Frank 0. Carroll III 

regarding the merits of this First Motion for Extension of Time. Mr. Carroll infonned me 

that he was unopposed to the filing of this First Motion for Extension of Time. 

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 

I hereby certify that this document is 3 83 words, as calculated by the word count 

feature of Microsoft Word 2013 (Professional Edition). 

3 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing has been sent 

facsimile and/or regular mail, to all counsel of record, in accordance with the Texas Rules 

of Civil Procedure on this the 16th day of October, 2015. 

William C. Davidson 

4
No. II-12-010 April 4, 2012

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416

NRC MONITORS EVENTS AT CATAWBA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT AFTER LOSS 

OF OFFSITE POWER AND UNUSUAL EVENT DECLARATION

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is monitoring the situation at the Catawba

nuclear power plant after the site lost offsite power Wednesday evening. 

The NRC is monitoring the event through the NRC resident inspectors at the site and in 

the Atlanta regional office. The plant is operated by Duke Energy near York, S.C., about 18 

miles south of Charlotte, N.C.

One of the two units at the plant was already shut down for an outage and the other unit 

automatically shut down after losing offsite power. The plant's diesel generators started to power 

the units’ emergency loads. Plant operators and other plant staff are monitoring the situation and 

attempting to restore the power. Safety systems have operated as needed.

Duke officially notified the NRC of the situation soon after it happened, and the agency's 

senior resident inspector was dispatched to the site. He has been able to observe plant activities 

as well as provide status reports to the NRC staff manning the incident response center in 

Atlanta. Duke declared an unusual event, the lowest of the four NRC emergency classification 

levels, just after 8 p.m. EDT.

There was no radiation released or impact to plant workers or the public. Once the event 

is over, the NRC will review the cause of the incident and determine if additional inspections or 

follow-up are needed.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave. NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
Exhibit 32.1

Certification  Pursuant  to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. ss.1350)

I, Beaufort J.B.  Clarke,  Chairman and Chief Executive  Officer of ICON Capital
Corp.,  the Manager of the Registrant in connection with the Quarterly Report of
ICON Income Fund Ten, LLC (the "LLC") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2006, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the "Quarterly Report") certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.   The Quarterly  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78m); and

2.   The information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     LLC.


Dated:   August 14, 2006

 /s/ Beaufort J.B. Clarke
------------------------------------
Beaufort J.B. Clarke
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
ICON Capital Corp.
Manager of ICON Income Fund Ten, LLC
---

|CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER     
|---------------------------------------------
|PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,          
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Rainer Rotthaeuser, the Chief Executive Officer of Exploration Drilling International Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                       

| | By:    | /s/ Rainer Rotthaeuser               
| | ------ | -------------------------------------
| |        |                                      
| | Name:  | RAINER ROTTHAEUSER                   
| |        |                                      
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and President
| |        |                                      
| | Date:  | August 19, 2008                      
| |        |                                      

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Max Levy, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Lewis, JJ.
#### § 265.5 Laws of Maryland and Colorado applicable.

Unless otherwise specifically provided herein, the laws of the State of Maryland and of the State of Colorado shall be applicable to the site located within those respective States. The applicability of State laws shall not, however, affect or abrogate any other Federal law or regulation applicable under the circumstances.
NEW EXCISE TAX RATES IN KYRGYZSTAN

----

9 FEB 99
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

** **

In connection with the report of ProUroCare MedicalInc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31,2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Maurice R. Taylor, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,and I, Richard Thon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to thebest of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:

 

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/    Maurice  R. Taylor |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                     |
| Maurice R. Taylor                        |
| Chief Executive Officer                  |
| May 10, 2006                        |
|                                     |
|                                     |
| /s/    Richard  Thon      |   |
|                                     |
| Richard Thon                             |
| Chief Financial Officer                  |
| May 10, 2006                        |
|                                          |        |  |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 25 (Friday, February 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 5839]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2539]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by March 8, 
2004.
    Title, Form and OMB Number: Department of Defense Education 
Activity (DoDEA) High School Longitudinal Study; OMB Number [to be 
determined].
    Type of Request: New collection.
    Number of Respondents: 1,626.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 1,626.
    Average Burden per Response: 15 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 407.
    Needs and Uses: The Department of Defense Education Activity 
(DoDEA) operates 224 public schools in 21 districts located in 14 
foreign countries, seven states, Guam, and Puerto Rico. To evaluate the 
Quality High School Initiative developed at the DoDEA High School 
Symposium in October 2001, contact with DoDEA high school students and 
their sponsors who have left DoDEA high schools is necessary. Sponsors 
and students in grades 9 through 12 who leave DoDEA high schools for 
any reason (including permanent change of station and graduation) will 
be contacted three to five months after leaving DoDEA schools and then 
again one year later using a telephonic survey. The collected data will 
be used to determine if quality educational programs are provided to 
all DoDEA high school students, regardless of where their sponsors are 
stationed. There is no existing data that is sufficiently comprehensive 
to meet the need for this information requirement.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jacqueline Zeiher. Written comments and 
recommendations on the proposed information collection should be sent 
to Ms. Zeiher at the Office of Management and Budget, Desk Officer for 
DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Jacqueline Davis. Written requests for 
copies of the information collection proposal should be sent to Ms. 
Davis, WHS/DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, 
VA 22202-4302.

    Dated: January 30, 2004.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 04-2539 Filed 2-5-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
EXHIBIT 31



CERTIFICATION



I, Anthony N. DeMint,
certify that:

1. I have
		reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB of Vanity Enterprises, Inc.;
2. Based on
		my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement
		of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
		the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
		statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
		by this report;
3. Based on
		my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
		included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects
		the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
		small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this
		annual report;
4. I am the
		sole officer and director and I am responsible for establishing and
		maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
		Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
		have:

> Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
> 				disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my
> 				supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
> 				small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
> 				is made known to me by others within those entities,
> 				particularly during the period in which this report is being
> 				prepared;
> 		Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer
> 				disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
> 				my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
> 				controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
> 				this report based on such evaluation; and
> 		Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
> 				issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred
> 				during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter
> 				(the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
> 				of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
> 				reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
> 				issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

1. I have
		disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
		financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors of the
		small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
		equivalent functions):

> All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
> 				design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
> 				which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small
> 				business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and
> 				report financial information; and
> 		Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
> 				other employees who have a significant role in the small
> 				business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: February 7,
2005





/s/ Anthony N. DeMint_________

Anthony N. DeMint

President and

Chief Accounting
Officer
#### Herman Brandt v. Joseph Davidson

Present •—■ Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Martin, P. J., taking no part.
#### In the Matter of Harold A. Dolly et al., Appellants, against John F. O'Connell et al., Individually and as Members of the State Liquor Authority, Respondents.

Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
#### Sylvia Greenfield, as Administratrix of the Estate of Michael Greenfield, Deceased, Respondent, v. Irwin L. Novick, Defendant, and Shwayder Bros., Inc., Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, the motion to vacate the summons granted and the cross motion to examine appellant before trial denied. The statute, section 52 of the Yehicle and Traffic Law, applies only where the person to be served was in fact the owner or operator of the automobile involved in the accident, and does not apply to a case like the present one where there is an attempt to predicate liability on ownership and operation by an alleged agent *(Wallace*v. *Smith,*238 App. Div. 599). Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Breitel and Bastow, JJ.