alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §7635. Service in other agencies

(a) The Secretary, with the consent of the participant or individual involved and the consent of the head of the department or agency involved, may permit—

(1) a period of obligated service required under this chapter to be performed in the Veterans Health Administration to be performed in another Federal department or agency or in the Armed Forces in lieu of performance of such service in the Veterans Health Administration; and

(2) a period of obligated service required to be performed in another Federal department or agency or in the Armed Forces under another Federal health personnel educational assistance program to be performed in the Veterans Health Administration.

(b) This section shall be carried out in cooperation with the heads of other appropriate departments and agencies.

(Added Pub. L. 100–322, title II, §216(b), May 20, 1988, 102 Stat. 529, §4335; renumbered §7635, Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §402(b)(1), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 238; amended Pub. L. 102–83, §4(b)(1), (2)(E), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 404, 405; Pub. L. 103–446, title XII, §1201(b)(1), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4682.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–446 substituted "Veterans Health Administration" for "Department of Medicine and Surgery" wherever appearing.

1991—Pub. L. 102–40 renumbered section 4335 of this title as this section.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–83 substituted "Secretary" for "Administrator" in introductory provisions.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Page 9 of 19


                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(b)

                        KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 1999-B
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

Bank One, National Association             Banker's Trust Company
One Bank One Plaza, Suite 0126             Four Albany Street
Chicago, Illinois 60670                    New York, New York 10006
ATTN: Corporate Trust Administration       ATTN: Corporate Trust & Agency Group
                                             Structured Finance
Phone:   (312) 407-0192                    Phone:    (212) 250-6501
Fax:     (312) 407-1708                    Fax:      (212) 250-6439

Key Bank USA, National Association
800 Superior Ave, 4th Floor
Cleveland, OH  44114
ATTN: Senior Vice President
         Key Education Resources
Phone:   (216) 828-9342
Fax:     (216) 828-9417


Pursuant to Section 3.08 of the Subservicing Agreement between Key Bank USA,
National Association as Master Servicer and Pennsylvania Higher Education
Assistance Agency, as Subservicer, dated as of September 1, 1999 (the
"Agreement"), the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) a review of the
activities of the Subservicer from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2000,
and of its performance under the Agreement has been made, and (ii) to the best
of the undersigned's knowledge, based on the review, the Subservicer has
fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period

                                           PENNSYLVANIA HIGHER EDUCATION
                                           ASSISTANCE AGENCY,  Subservicer

Date: March 21, 2001                      By   /s/ Ernest P. Beardsley
      ----------------------                 -------------------------------
                                          Name:  Ernest P. Beardsley
                                          Title: Senior Vice President
115 STAT. 262 PUBLIC LAW 107–49—OCT. 15, 2001

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1583:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 147 (2001):

Sept. 24, considered and passed House.

Sept. 25, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 107–49

107th Congress

An Act

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 121

West Spring Street in New Albany, Indiana, as the ‘‘Lee H. Hamilton Federal

Building and United States Courthouse’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The Federal building and United States courthouse located

at 121 West Spring Street in New Albany, Indiana, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘Lee H. Hamilton Federal Building and

United States Courthouse’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the Federal building and

United States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

to be a reference to the ‘‘Lee H. Hamilton Federal Building and

United States Courthouse’’.

Approved October 15, 2001.

Oct. 15, 2001

[H.R. 1583]
#### § 591.406 Records and reports.

So that the Office of Personnel Management can evaluate agencies' use of this authority and provide the Congress and others with information regarding the use of a nonforeign separate maintenance allowance, each agency shall maintain such records and submit to the Office of Personnel Management reports and data as requested.
Issue Date: 07/29/08 08-021 -1-

 NRC INSPECTION MANUAL DIRS

Change Notice 08-021 

 DELETED: TRANSMITTED: 

 Number Date Number Date

1. IMC 2602 08/22/05 IMC 2602 07/29/08 

2. IP 35017 06/22/05 IP 35017 07/29/08 

3. ________ ________ IP 42454 07/29/08 

4. ________ ________ IP 65001.07 07/29/08 

5. ________ ________ IP 65001.12 07/29/08 

6. ________ ________ IP 65001.14 07/29/08 

7. ________ ________ IP 83746 07/29/08 

8. TI 0610/001 12/06/05 ________ ________ 

9. ________ ________ IMC 0616 07/29/08 

TRAINING: None 

REMARKS: IMC 2602 (Decommissioning Oversight and Inspection Program for Fuel 

Cycle and Materials Licensees) has been revised to reflect new 

organizational changes and new procedures. 

IP 35017 (Quality Assurance Implementation Inspection) has been revised 

to change Program Applicability to include IMC 2501, “Construction 

Inspection Program: Early Site Permit (ESP)” and IMC 2508, 

“Construction Inspection Program: Design Certification.” The inspection 

procedure was also revised to align with NUREG-0800, “Standard Review 

Plan for the Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants.” 

IP 42454 (Part 52, Emergency Procedures) is issued to support 

inspections of operational programs described in IMC 2504, “Construction 

Inspection Program - Non-ITAAC Inspections.” 
Issue Date: 07/29/08 -2- 08-021 

IP 65001.07 (Inspection of ITAAC-Related Installation of Valves) is to 

support Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria (ITAAC)-

related inspections under 10 CFR Part 52 guidance. 

IP 65001.12 (Inspection of ITAAC-Related Installation of Heating, 

Ventilating, and Air Conditioning Systems) is issued to support ITAACrelated inspections under 10 CFR Part 52 guidance. 

IP 65001.14 (Inspection of ITAAC-Related Installation of Complex 

Systems with Multiple Components) is issued to support ITAAC-related 

inspections under 10 CFR Part 52 guidance. 

IP 83746 (Part 52, Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM)) is issued to 

support inspections of operational programs described in non-ITACC 

inspections. 

TI 0610/001 (Guidance for Certain Fuel Cycle Inspection Reports to Pilot 

Use of NRC Form 591) has been deleted. Elements of TI 0610/001 were 

incorporated into IMC 0616”; therefore this TI is no longer needed. 

 IMC 0616 (Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards Inspection Reports) 

is issued for use by Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards (FCSS) and Region 

II inspectors. These Offices will no longer use IMC 0610, “Nuclear 

Material Safety and Safeguards Inspection Reports.” 

DISTRIBUTION: Standard 

 

END
§ 0.735-47 Decision absent a hearing. ( a ) If the former employee does not request a hearing in a timely manner, the Director shall make an initial decision on the basis of information compiled in the investigation, and any submissions made by the former employee.
( b ) The proposed sanction or a lesser included sanction shall be imposed if the record indicates a violation of post-employment statutes or regulations by a preponderance of the evidence.
( c ) The initial decision shall become final thirty days after issuance if there has been no appeal filed under § 0.735-48.
# L_2022183EN.01000101.xml

| 8.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 183/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 183/1

---

Notice concerning the entry into force of the Partnership Agreement on Relations and Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and New Zealand, of the other part

The Partnership Agreement on Relations and Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and New Zealand, of the other part, signed at Brussels on 5 October 2016
   (1), will enter into force on 21 July 2022, the procedure provided for in Article 58(1) of the Agreement having been completed on 21 June 2022.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 321, 29.11.2016, p. 3 and OJ L 171, 28.6.2022, p. 1.

1

---
#### In the Matter of the Claim of John Mulvey, Respondent, against Terence Toal et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

All concur.
### [§1143. Vacant]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Prior to renumbering of sections 301 to 363 of this chapter as sections 1101 to 1163 by Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 406, section 343 of this chapter, Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1124, which prescribed conditions under which wartime rates of compensation were payable, was repealed by Pub. L. 93–295, title II, §206(b), title IV, §401, May 31, 1974, 88 Stat. 183, 184, effective May 1, 1974.
The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western

1

District of Missouri. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-3957

___________

RTC Mortgage Trust 1994-N2, a *

Delaware Business Trust, *

*

Appellee *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Missouri.

Myron W. Haith; Richard Brock; *

Stuart Kahn, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellants, *

*

Joseph Haith, *

*

Garnishee. *

___________

 Submitted: December 8, 1998

 Filed: December 31, 1998

___________

Before HANSEN, ROSS and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Myron Haith, Richard Brock, and Stuart Kahn appeal from the district court’s1

denial of their Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion. After carefully reviewing
-2-

the record and the parties’ submissions, we conclude the district court did not abuse its

discretion. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed April 14, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-154 Lower Tribunal No. 19-38-A-M

________________ 

### Julio Melendez, Appellant, vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee. An appeal conducted pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Ruth L. Becker, Judge. Julio Melendez, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before FERNANDEZ, HENDON and GORDO, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
Exhibit
14




CODE
OF ETHICS FOR THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,


CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER AND CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER




This Code
of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the
Chief Accounting Officer (this “Code of Ethics”) governs the conduct of the
Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Accounting
Officer of Victoria Industries, Inc. (the “Company”). This Code of Ethics is
designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote ethical and legal behavior by the
Company’s Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the Chief
Accounting Officer.




The Chief
Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Accounting Officer
are responsible for:




a) Acting
with honesty and integrity, and avoiding actual or apparent conflicts of
interest involving personal and professional relationships. A “conflict of
interest” exists when an individual’s private interests interfere or conflict in
any way (or even appear to interfere or conflict) with the interests of the
Company;




b)
Ensuring that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures function properly
and providing information that is full, fair, accurate, timely, and
understandable for Securities and Exchange Commission filings and in other
public communications made by the Company;




c)
Complying with applicable laws, rules, and regulations of all U.S. and non-U.S.
governmental entities, as well as other private and public regulatory agencies
to which the Company is subject;




d) Acting
in good faith and, responsibly with due care, competence and diligence, without
misrepresenting material facts or allowing independent judgment to violate this
Code of Ethics; and




e)
Reporting illegal or unethical conduct by a director, officer or employee that
has occurred, is occurring or may occur, including any potential violations of
this Code of Ethics.




Violations
of this Code of Ethics shall be reported to the Chairman of the Audit Committee
of the Board of Directors whether the violations are of a financial or
non-financial nature. The waiver of any duty or responsibility set forth in this
Code of Ethics must be made by the Board of Directors of the Company. This Code
of Ethics will be an Exhibit to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008,
and posted to the Company website.




Acknowledgment




This is
to acknowledge receipt of the Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer,
the Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Accounting Officer. I understand that
failure to adhere to the principles and responsibilities set forth in this Code
of Ethics may result in disciplinary action, including reprimand, warnings,
suspension, demotion, salary reduction, restitution and/or discharge, as well as
possible legal penalties.





Signature:
              /s/ Oleg
  Batratchenko


Oleg
Batratchenko


Chief
Executive Officer





Date:
March 30, 2009
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Supreme Court Cause No. DA 2 3

- 0273

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ZACKARY MATTHEW MAAS

,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT’S

OPENING BRIEF

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for a n extension of time to file

his opening brief , and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of

time to and including September 20 , 2024 within which to file his opening

brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 21 2024

08/21/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0273
#### § 919.355 What information must I provide to a higher tier participant before entering into a covered transaction with that participant?

Before you enter into a covered transaction with a person at the next higher tier, you as a lower tier participant must notify that person if you know that you or any of the principals are presently excluded or disqualified.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                Certification

                     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

                                  As Adopted

                        Pursuant to Section 906 of the

                         Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002



      In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of China Energy & Carbon Black
Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"),on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission  ("SEC")  on the date
hereof  (the  "Report"),  each  of  the  undersigned of the Company, certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. {section}1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of their knowledge:

      3.    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      4.    the information contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in  all
            material   respects,   the   financial  condition  and  results  of
            operations of the Company.

      A signed original of this written statement  has  been  provided  to  the
Company and will be retained by the Company and will be furnished to the SEC or
its staff upon request.



/s/ Mei Qi Zhang
Chief Financial Officer
August 1, 2005




This Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  This exhibit is not "filed" for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 but is instead furnished as
provided by applicable rules of the Securities Exchange Commission.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument, and therefore denies King’s request. See Fed. R. App. P.

34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT HADEN KING, Jr.,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

JOE E. CAPPS, Inspector III; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-35304

D.C. No. 6:08-cv-06195-TC-MRH

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Michael R. Hogan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 25, 2010** 

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. 

Robert Haden King, Jr., an Oregon state prisoner, appeals from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action arising from a misconduct

report issued against him because of a letter he mailed to his girlfriend. We have

FILED

JUN 17 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-35304

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Sacks v. Office of

Foreign Assets Control, 466 F.3d 764, 770 (9th Cir. 2006). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed King’s First Amendment claim because

he failed to allege facts suggesting he was injured as a result of the misconduct

report, which was later dismissed. See Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 449 (9th

Cir. 2000) (“In a constitutional tort, as in any other, a plaintiff must allege that the

defendant’s actions caused him some injury.”); see also Sprewell v. Golden State

Warriors, 266 F.3d 979, 988 (9th Cir. 2001) (“The court need not . . . accept as

true allegations that contradict matters properly subject to judicial notice or by

exhibit.”).

The district court properly dismissed King’s due process claim because he

failed to allege facts implicating a constitutionally-protected liberty or property

interest. See Bd. of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569 (1972).

The district court properly dismissed King’s equal protection claim because

he failed to allege facts suggesting he was a member of a protected class or that

similarly-situated inmates outside that class were treated less severely. See

Thornton v. City of St. Helens, 425 F.3d 1158, 1166 (9th Cir. 2005) (to state an

equal protection claim, the plaintiff must allege facts that defendants “acted with
3 09-35304

an intent or purpose to discriminate against the plaintiff based upon membership in

a protected class”) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). 

The district court properly dismissed King’s Eighth Amendment claim

because he failed to allege facts suggesting he suffered a sufficiently serious

deprivation. See Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 834 (1994) (to state an Eighth

Amendment claim a prisoner must show that an official’s act or omission resulted

in the denial of “the minimal civilized measure of life’s necessities”) (citation and

internal quotation marks omitted).

King’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive. 

King’s motion to appoint counsel is denied. 

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 21 (Thursday, January 31, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 787]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00330]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Cell Biology Integrated Review Group; 
Molecular and Integrative Signal Transduction Study Section.
    Date: February 7-8, 2019.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Torrance Marriott Redondo Beach, 3635 Fashion Way, 
Torrance, Torrance, CA 90503.
    Contact Person: Charles Selden, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5187, MSC 7840, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-451-3388, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2f5c4a434b4a415c6f424e46430141464701484059"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9ae9fff6fefff4e9daf7fbf3f6b4f4f3f2b4fdf5ec">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in 
advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of 
December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 25, 2019.
Sylvia L. Neal,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-00330 Filed 1-30-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Michael A. Reisner, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President of ICON Capital
Corp., the Manager of the Registrant, in connection with the Quarterly Report of
ICON Income Fund Ten, LLC (the “LLC”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”) certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the LLC.





Date: November
12, 2009





/s/Michael A. Reisner


Michael
A. Reisner


Co-Chief
Executive Officer and Co-President


ICON
Capital Corp.


Manager
of ICON Income Fund Ten, LLC
#### Amr A. Wasfi *v.*Board of Veterinary Registration and Examination et al.

*Noel R. Newman,*in support of the petition.

*Paul J. Lahey,*assistant attorney general, in opposition.

Decided April 5, 1988

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 13 Conn. App. 817, is denied.
#### § 256.6 Information concerning the Research Associate Program.

Information concerning the Research Associate Program may be obtained from the Industrial Liaison Officer, National Institute of Standards & Technology, Washington, DC 20234.

[40 FR 50707, Oct. 31, 1975]