alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joseph Kaczka, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President, Finance and
Controller, and Secretary of Republic Engineered Products Holdings LLC (the
"Company"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge,

1.   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ending June
     30, 2003 (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
     78m or 78o(d)), and

2.   The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Date: August 12, 2003           By: /s/Joseph Kaczka
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                Joseph Kaczka
                                Chief Financial Officer, Vice President, Finance
                                and Controller, and Secretary
Editorial Note on Part 15
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 15 appear at 62 FR 19669, Apr. 23, 1997.

§ 15.18 Testimony of Department employees in proceedings involving the United States. The following applies in legal proceedings in which the United States is a party: ( a ) A Department employee may not testify as an expert or opinion witness for any other party other than the United States.
( b ) Whenever, in any legal proceeding involving the United States, a request is made by an attorney representing or acting under the authority of the United States, the General Counsel, or the Solicitor, or appropriate agency counsel will make all necessary arrangements for the Department employee to give testimony on behalf of the United States. Where appropriate, the General Counsel, or the Solicitor, or appropriate agency counsel may require reimbursement to the Department of the expenses associated with a Department employee giving testimony on behalf of the United States.
### §20302. Purpose

The purpose of the corporation is to further the interests of literature and the fine arts.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1286.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20302 | 36:4202. | Apr. 17, 1916, ch. 77, §2, 39 Stat. 51. |

Section

The words "is to further" are substituted for "are and shall be the furtherance of" to eliminate unnecessary words.
1

i

U n i t e d S t a t e s G o v e r n m e n t

M e m o r a n d u m

FORM G-JISf (1-92)

R a i l r o a d R e t i r e m e n t B o a r d

JAN 21 me

L-2000-4

TO

FROM

Ronald Russo

Acting Director of Policy and Systems

Steven A. Bartholo 

General Counsel

SUBJECT CSX Pension Plan, Amended and Restated through 

September 9,1998

This is in response to your memorandum dated December 14,1999, requesting 

an opinion as to whether the CSX Pension Plan, Amended and Restated 

through September 9,1998 (Pension Plan) is a supplemental pension plan 

within the meaning of section 2(h)(2) of the Railroad Retirement Act. If the 

Pension Plan is such a supplemental pension plan, you indicate you will 

continue with your current practice of sending the applicable supplemental 

annuity tax credits to CSX Transportation.

Section 216.42(a) of the Board’s regulations defines a supplemental pension 

plan as follows:

(a) What is a private railroad pension. * * * A private pension for 

purposes of this subpart is a plan that:

(1) Is a written plan or arrangement which is communicated 

to the employees to whom it applies;

(2) Is established and maintained by an emlpoyer for a 

defined group of employees; and

(3) Provides for the payment of definitely determinable 

benefits of employees over a period of years, usually for 

life, after retirement or disability. Such a plan is 

sometimes referred to as a deferred benefit plan.
Ronald Russo

The Pension Plan at issue is a restatement of a plan previously approved in L88-70. It is a written plan, communicated to the employees to whom it applies, 

i.e., salaried employees, and covers employees previously covered. The 

Pension Plan is a defined benefit plan and is funded by employer 

contributions. The Pension Plan is intended to meet all the requirements of 

the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the Employee Retirement 

Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.

On the basis of my review of the documents provided with your inquiry, I 

concur with your opinion that the above-described Pension Plan is a private 

pension within the meaning of section 2(h)(2) of the RRA and section 216.42 of 

the Board’s regulations.

NVRuss

H:\OPINIONS\CSX-PensionPlan.NVR.doc 

C. 3651-99
### SUBCHAPTER III—OTHER RESPONSIBILITIES
#### Anna J. Griffith, as Administratrix, etc., Plaintiff, v. Victor William Cupples, Defendant.

Motion granted, without costs. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ.
#### In the Matter of the Application of Robert Henry Stevens, Appellant, for a Peremptory Writ of Mandamus against Charles J. McCormack, as President of the Borough of Richmond, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ., concurred; Burr, J., not voting.
REMARKS OF NRC CHAIRMAN GREGORY B. JACZKO AT PROGRAM BRIEFING 

FROM NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH 

Good morning. Today, the office of Nuclear Regulatory Research will brief the 

Commission on the status of the important programs under its supervision. The agency’s 

regulatory research programs advance our mission by providing the advice, tools, and 

information that we need to identify and resolve safety issues, develop regulations and guidance, 

and make regulatory decisions. 

The Commission and the other program offices benefit greatly from the office’s 

consistently high-quality analyses and reports. The office provides the critical independent 

analysis that the agency needs to verify the claims made by licensees and to ensure that they 

remain in compliance with our safety, security, and environmental regulations. The agency 

simply could not conduct effective oversight without the office’s work. 

I would like to note that this is National Engineers Week – a time to recognize the 

contributions that engineers make to our society, as well as to take measure of the importance of 

math, science, and technical skills. These are not things that we overlook around here – this 

agency and the industry that it regulates would not exist without the historical and continuing 

contributions of engineers. I am glad that others around the nation are making a special effort 

this week to acknowledge and honor the hard work, dedication, and vital contributions of our 

nation’s engineers. 

Note: Briefing slides for this meeting are available at http://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/doc-collections/commission/slides/2010/20100218/nrr-staff-slides-100218.pdf. A full 

transcript of the meeting will be available soon at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/commission/tr/2010/. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-032 February 18, 2010
Exhibit 15.4

[Letterhead of King & Wood]

June 29, 2010

NetEase.com,
Inc.

26/F, SP Tower D

Tsinghua
Science Park Building 8

No. 1 Zhongguancun East Road

Haidian District, Beijing 100084, Peoples Republic of China

Dear Sirs,

Re: Consent of Peoples
Republic of China Counsel

We consent to the reference to our firm under the heading Enforcement of Civil Liabilities in the annual
report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 of NetEase.com, Inc. to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in the month of June 2010.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Very truly yours,      
|                       
|/s/ King & Wood        
|King & Wood PRC Lawyers
AZERBAIJAN: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION: AN EMERGING ISSUE

----
# L_2020228EN.01002701.xml

| 16.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 228/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 228/27

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 16/2019

of 8 February 2019

amending Annex IV (Energy) to the EEA Agreement [2020/935]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/749 of 18 May 2018 on recognition of the report of Croatia including typical greenhouse gas emissions from cultivation of agricultural raw materials pursuant to Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/749 of 18 May 2018 on recognition of the report of Croatia including typical greenhouse gas emissions from cultivation of agricultural raw materials pursuant to Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex IV to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex IV to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 41a (Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/2356) of Annex IV to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘41b. | 32018 D 0749: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/749 of 18 May 2018 on recognition of the report of Croatia including typical greenhouse gas emissions from cultivation of agricultural raw materials pursuant to Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 125, 22.5.2018, p. 12).
  The Decision shall not apply to Liechtenstein.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘41b.

32018 D 0749: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/749 of 18 May 2018 on recognition of the report of Croatia including typical greenhouse gas emissions from cultivation of agricultural raw materials pursuant to Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 125, 22.5.2018, p. 12).

The Decision shall not apply to Liechtenstein.’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/749 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 9 February 2019, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 February 2019.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 125, 22.5.2018, p. 12.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 5, 2020

No. 04-20-00031-CR

IN RE Kevin DEBNAM

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

On January 21, 2020, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an application for 

leave to file the petition. We deny as moot relator’s application because leave is not required to 

file a petition for writ of mandamus in an intermediate appellate court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.1; 

In re Medina, 04-19-00041-CR, 2019 WL 360534, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Jan. 30, 2019, 

no pet.).

After considering the petition, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief 

sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

It is so ORDERED on February 5, 2020.

_____________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of February, 2020.

_____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause Nos. 2019CR6484, 2019CR6485, 2019CR6494, & 2019CR6495, styled The 

State of Texas v. Kevin Debnam, pending in the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable 

Stephanie R. Boyd presiding.
§ 280.206 Filing and service of papers other than charging letter. ( a ) *Filing.* All papers to be filed shall be addressed to “FQA Administrative Enforcement Proceedings,” at the address set forth in the charging letter, or such other place as the administrative law judge may designate. Filing by United States mail, first class postage prepaid, by express or equivalent parcel delivery service, or by hand delivery, is acceptable. Filing by mail from a foreign country shall be by airmail. In addition, the administrative law judge may authorize filing of papers by facsimile or other electronic means, provided that a hard copy of any such paper is subsequently filed. A copy of each paper filed shall be simultaneously served on each party.
( b ) *Service.* Service shall be made by personal delivery or by mailing one copy of each paper to each party in the proceeding. Service by delivery service or facsimile, in the manner set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, is acceptable. Service on the Department shall be addressed to the Chief Counsel for Export Administration, Room H-3839, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230. Service on a respondent shall be to the address to which the charging letter was sent or to such other address as respondent may provide. When a party has appeared by counsel or other representative, service on counsel or other representative shall constitute service on that party.
( c ) *Date.* The date of filing or service is the day when the papers are deposited in the mail or are delivered in person, by delivery service, or by facsimile.
( d ) *Certificate of service.* A certificate of service signed by the party making service, stating the date and manner of service, shall accompany every paper, other than the charging letter, filed and served on parties.
( e ) *Computing period of time.* In computing any period of time prescribed or allowed by this part or by order of the administrative law judge or the Under Secretary, the day of the act, event, or default from which the designated period of time begins to run is not to be included. The last day of the period so computed is to be included unless it is a Saturday, a Sunday, or a legal holiday (as defined in Rule 6(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure), in which case the period runs until the end of the next day which is neither a Saturday, a Sunday, nor a legal holiday. Intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays are excluded from the computation when the period of time prescribed or allowed is seven days or less.
#### § 270.340 Information created by investigation participants who are not NIST employees.

Unless requested sooner by the Lead Investigator, at the conclusion of an investigation, each investigation participant who is not a NIST employee shall transfer any original information they created pursuant to the investigation to NIST. An investigation participant may retain a copy of the information for their records but may not use the information for purposes other than the investigation, nor may they release, reproduce, distribute, or publish any information first developed pursuant to the investigation, nor authorize others to do so, without the written permission of the Director or their designee. Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 281a, no such information may be admitted or used as evidence in any suit or action for damages arising out of any matter related to the investigation.
B.C.D. 00-39 SEP 1 9 2000

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION 

Maryland and Pennsylvania Railroad Company

Yorkrail, Inc.

York Railway Company

Maryland and Pennsylvania Railroad Company, LLC

Yorkrail, LLC

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning the

status of Maryland and Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Yorkrail, Inc., York

Railway Company, Maryland and Pennsylvania Railroad Company, LLC, and

Yorkrail, LLC, as employers under the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231

et seg.) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. § 351 et seq.).

Information regarding these companies was provided by Ann Wileczek, Vice 

President, Human Resources, York Railway Company, and was also obtained

from Surface Transportation Board Finance Docket No. 33815. On December 1,

1999, Yorkrail, Inc., and Maryland and Pennsylvania Railroad Company,

employers under the Acts (BA. Nos. 2351 and 2314, respectively) were merged

into a new company, York Railway Company. That company took over the rail

operations previously performed by Yorkrail, Inc., and Maryland and

Pennsylvania Railroad Company. However, assets of those two companies

were transferred to two new companies, Yorkrail, LLC, and Maryland and

Pennsylvania Railroad Company, LLC. These two new companies are

subsidiaries of York Railway Company and have no employees and perform no

operations. The Surface Transportation Board stated that they will “assume

common carrier status by virtue of the ownership of the underlying rail assets

that [York Railway Company] will operate.”

The evidence of record establishes that York Railway Company and its two

subsidiaries, Yorkrail, LLC, and Maryland and Pennsylvania Railroad

Company, LLC, are carriers subject to the jurisdiction of the Surface

Transportation Board. Accordingly, it is determined that they are employers

within the meaning of section l(aXl)(i) of the Railroad Retirement Act (45

U.S.C. § 231(aXlXi)) and the corresponding provision of the Railroad

Unemployment Insurance Act as of December 1, 1999, the date as of which

BA# 2388
-2-

Maryland and Pennsylvania Railroad Company

Yorkrail, Inc.

York Railway Company

Maryland and Pennsylvania Railroad Company, LLC

Yorkrail, LLC

operations were commenced. The status ofYorkrail, Inc., and Maryland and

Pennsylvania Railroad Company as employers under the Acts is terminated as

of the same date.
**Exhibit
      32.2**











**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of AIDA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. a Nevada
      corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-QSB for the annual period ending March
      31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,
      Hui Lin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my
      knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/
              Hui LinHui LinChief Financial OfficerDate:________________,
              2006
Board Coverage Decision

2010-42.19

St. Johns River Terminal Company

Employer Coverage Terminated*

No Decision Published

BA # 4530
#### Arthur J. Jones, as Administrator of the Estate of James A. Jones, Deceased, Appellant, v. Edward Robert Rigney, Jr., Respondent.

Motion for reargument denied. Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 803.]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 219 (Monday, November 15, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 65673]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25310]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster <greek-i>P056; Amendment <greek-i>1]


State of Georgia

    In accordance with a notice received from the Department of 
Homeland Security--Federal Emergency Management Agency--effective 
October 30, 2004, the above numbered Public Assistance declaration is 
hereby amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as 
beginning September 3, 2004, and continuing through October 30, 2004.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for physical damage is November 23, 2004.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59008.)


    Dated: November 8, 2004.
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-25310 Filed 11-12-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Brazil Proposes Raising Biodiesel Mandate To B10

Brazil Proposes Raising Biodiesel Mandate To B10.htm [9/21/2015 12:59:46 PM] Australian State

Considering Biofuel Mandate Oil-Price Slump

Threatens Biofuels Growth Port of

Rotterdam: 2014 Biofuel Throughput Falls To 7- Year Low Mitigating

Emissions Through Fossil-Fuel Subsidy Reform EU Biofuels Could Rise Without Adding To Deforestation

By Bryan Sims. Published September 18, 2015 INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS 

# Brazil Proposes Raising Biodiesel Mandate To B10 Archives Log In Subscribe Today

MENU 

### Proposed Law 2.751/2015, put forward by Congressman Luciano Ducci of Paraná, one of the main biodiesel

producing states, would raise the current biodiesel mandate in three stages: from the current 7 vol% to 8 vol% in 2016, to 9 vol% in 2017 and finally to 10 vol% in 2 018. This would put Brazil’s biodiesel mandate on the same footing as Argentina and Colombia, which both have B10 mandates. If approved by both houses of Congress and President Dilma Rousseff, it would be the second change in Brazil’s biodiesel mandate wit hin the past six months, since September 2014 Law 13.033 was passed, increasing the mandate from 6 vol% to 7 vol%. “Given the current weak economy and political climate in Brazil, increasing the biodiesel blend could provide financial support to the soybea n sector, while also helping Petrobras lower its diesel imports,” according to analysis by Stratas Advisors, a Hart Energy company. “Furthermore, ANFAVEA, Brazil’s vehicle manufacturers association, has not come out against the draft law, with previous sta tements showing support as long as increasing the blend is done responsibly,” Stratas noted. Since the introduction of the new 7 vol% mandate, biodiesel production has risen 3% from September 2014 to June 2015, and 21% between June 2014 and June 2015, acco rding to Stratas. “The new mandate has helped soybean producers, which have seen their profits decline as sales to foreign markets, particularly China, decrease and commodity prices continues to decline,” Stratas observed.