alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§1350)





I,
      Thomas
      W. Martin, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of ICON Capital
      Corp., the Manager of the Registrant in connection with the Quarterly Report
      of
      ICON Income Fund Ten, LLC (the "LLC") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June
      30,
      2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the "Quarterly Report") certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





1.
            The
                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                13(a) or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m);
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
                all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                the LLC.








*Dated:
      August 10, 2007*





*/s/
      Thomas W. Martin*


Thomas
      W.
      Martin


Chairman,
      Chief Executive Officer and President of the Manager


(Principal
      Executive Officer)


ICON
      Capital Corp.


Manager
      of ICON Income Fund Ten, LLC
§ 265.12 Speeding or reckless driving. ( a ) No person shall drive a motor vehicle on the site at a speed greater than or in a manner other than is reasonable and prudent for the particular location, given the conditions of traffic, weather, and road surface and having regard to the actual and potential hazards existing.
( b ) Except when a special hazard exists that requires lower speed for compliance with paragraph (a) of this section, the speed limit on the site is 25 m.p.h., unless another speed limit has been duly posted, and no person shall drive a motor vehicle on the site in excess of the speed limit.
### PART B—UNITED STATES CAPITOL
A VETERAN OBSERVER

----
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 2443 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-07-001 January 5, 2007

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC ISSUES CONFIRMATORY ORDER IN EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CASE

AT POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a Confirmatory Order to Nuclear Management

Co., operator of the Point Beach Nuclear Power Station, for a violation of the Commission’s

regulations protecting workers who raise safety issues from employment discrimination. The Point

Beach plant is located near Two Rivers, Wis.

An investigation by the NRC’s Office of Investigation determined that a Senior Reactor

Operator at the Point Beach plant was discriminated against in December 2004 by plant management

for raising safety issues involving deficiencies in a safety system operating procedure. The operator

had identified possible violations of NRC requirements in a document prepared as part of the plant’s

correction action program, and the NRC investigation determined that raising the issue had affected the

operator’s employee evaluation.

The Order issued by the NRC confirms the company’s agreement to take corrective actions at

the Point Beach plant and at the other three plants operated by Nuclear Management Co., Palisades in

Michigan and Monticello and Prairie Island in Minnesota. The company agreed to review and revise

its policy for the writing of correction action reports and to train employees and managers on

management’s expectation that employees should not be discouraged from using the corrective action

program.

Nuclear Management Co. supervisors and managers are to be provided with training on the

company’s policies for maintaining a safety conscious work environment, one in which employees are

free to raise safety issues without concern for retaliation or discrimination.

The corrective actions being taken by the company at its four sites were the result of an

agreement reached between the company and the NRC staff through an Alternative Disputes

Resolution process, conducted by an independent mediator on October 31, 2006. There is no fine or

other enforcement action associated with the Order.
The Confirmatory Order will be available on the NRC’s web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/what-we-do/regulatory/enforcement/current.html#reactor and from the Region III

Office of Public Affairs.

###

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. Email notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
### §522. Studies of rehabilitation of disabled persons

(a) The Secretary may conduct studies and investigations, and prepare reports, relative to the rehabilitation of disabled persons, the relative abilities, aptitudes, and capacities of the several groups of the variously handicapped, and how their potentialities can best be developed and their services best used in gainful and suitable employment including the rehabilitation programs of foreign nations.

(b) In carrying out this section, the Secretary (1) may cooperate with such public and private agencies as the Secretary considers advisable; and (2) may employ consultants who shall receive a reasonable per diem, as prescribed by the Secretary, for each day actually employed, plus necessary travel and other expenses.

(Added Pub. L. 102–83, §2(a), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 390.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Prior section 522 was renumbered section 1522 of this title.

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 217 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 102–83, §2(a).
#### § 2017.0 Definitions.

For purposes of this part:

*AGOA* means the African Growth and Opportunity Act, as amended (Title I of the Trade and Development Act of 2000, Pub. L. 106-200) (19 U.S.C. 2466a *et seq.*).

*TPC* means the Trade Policy Committee.

*TPRG* means the Trade Policy Review Group.

*TPSC* means the Trade Policy Staff Committee.

*USTR* means the Office of the United States Trade Representative.
#### STATE, Respondent, v. WATSON, Appellant.

(169 N. W. 235).

(File No. 4419.

Opinion filed Nov. 4, 1918).

Appeal from Circuit Court, Minnehaha County. FIon. Joseph W. Jones, Judge.

The defendant C. C. Watson, was convicted of unlawfully keeping in possession intoxicating liquor in- a public place, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

'State v. Brown, 40 S. D. 372, 167 N. W. 400, followed.

*H. F. Fellows,*for Appellant.

*C. C. Caldwell,*Attorney General, and! *C. V. Caldwell,*for the State.

POELE.Y, J.

Appellant was -convicted upon an information -charging him with a violation of the provisions of section 44, c. 281, of the Laws of 1917, to wit, that he unlawfully had and kept in his possession intoxicating liquor in a publ-ic place. From a judgment of conviction he appeals to this court, and asks for a reversal of said judgment on the grounds:

“(1) T-hat said section 44 is in conflict with section 21 of article 3 of the 'Constitution, in that said section is not embraced in the title of the act.

"(2) That section 44 of chapter 281 of the Laws of 1917 exceeds the limitations of the legislative power given in article 24 of the 'Constitution.”

*121The offense charged1 in this case is identical with the offense charged in State v. Brown, recently decided by this court, and reported in 167 N. W. 400. The ground's upon which we are asked for a reversal are the same as the grounds urged in that case. What we said in that case is applicable to the facts in this case, and consequently the result must be the same. We held in that case that, as against the objections urged in this case, section 44, c. 281, Laws 1917, was constitutional and valid, and sustained the conviction. The same result must follow in this case.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

SMITH, J., not sitting.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification  Pursuant  to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. ss.1350)

I,  Thomas W.  Martin,  Chief  Operating  Officer  and Chief  Financial  Officer
(Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) of ICON Capital Corp., the Manager
of the  Registrant in connection  with the Quarterly  Report of ICON Income Fund
Ten, LLC (the "LLC") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006,  as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Quarterly
Report")  certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.   The Quarterly  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78m); and

2.   The information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     LLC.


Dated: May 16, 2006

/s/ Thomas W. Martin
-------------------------------
Thomas W. Martin
Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
ICON Capital Corp.
Manager of ICON Income Fund Ten, LLC
### §8137. State control of operations

Except as otherwise specifically provided, nothing in this subchapter shall be construed as conferring on any Federal officer or employee the right to exercise any supervision or control over the administration, personnel, maintenance, or operation of any State home for which facilities are constructed or acquired with assistance received under this subchapter.

(Added Pub. L. 88–450, §4(a), Aug. 19, 1964, 78 Stat. 503, §5037; amended Pub. L. 98–528, title I, §105(5), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2690; renumbered §8137, Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §402(b)(1), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 238.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–40 renumbered section 5037 of this title as this section.

1984—Pub. L. 98–528 inserted "or acquired" after "constructed".
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. ELVIS DAVIS, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 13-10591

D.C . No. 3:89-c r-00106-SR B M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ariz o na M ark W . B e nne tt, Distric t Judge , Pre siding * * Subm itte d

August 13, 2014 *** B e fore : SC HR O EDER , THOM AS, and HUR W ITZ, C i rc uit Judge s . Elvis Da vis a ppe a ls from

the 42-m onth supe rvise d re le a se te rm im pose d upon re voc ation of supervise d re le a se . W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . 

# FIL ED AUG 18 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The Honora

ble M ark W . B e nne tt, Unite d State s Distric t Judge for the Northe rn Distric t of Iowa , sitting by de signa t ion. *** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).§ 1291, a

nd we a ffirm . Davis c onte nds tha

t the distric t c ourt viola

te d 18 U.S.C . § 3583(e ) and the Guide line s polic y

sta te m e nts by

im posing the se nte nc e for punitive purpose s, a nd by pla c ing unduewe ight on his crim ina l history . C ontra ry to Da vis’ s c onte ntion, he ha d a n opportunity

to a sse rt the se obje c tions in the distric t c ourt a

n d fa i le d to do so. Our re v ie w, the re fore , is for pla in e rror, s e e Unite d State s v . Vale nc iaBarragan , 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th C ir. 2010), a nd we find none . The re c ord re fle c ts tha

t the distric t c ourt did not im pose se nte nc e on the ba sis of thec onte ste d re voc ation a lle gation. Although the c ourt did c onside r Davis’ s origina l c rim e , it did so in the c onte xt of the se c tion 3583(e ) se nte nc ing fa c t ors, a nd did not im

p o se se nte nc e for punitive purpose s. Se e Unite d State s v . Simtob , 485 F.3d 1058, 1062 (9th C ir. 2007) (a t a re v oc ation se nte n c i ng, distric t c ourt m ay c onside r the c rim ina l history of the viola

tor be c a u se se c tion 3583(e ) spe c ific a lly

dire c ts c ourts to c onside r the history and c ha ra c te ristic s of the de fe nda nt). Fina lly , the re c o rd doe s not support Da v is’ s c onte ntion tha

t the c ourt pla c e d undue we ight on his crim ina l history in im posing the 42-m onth supe rvise d re le a se te rm . AFFIRM E D.

1 3 - 1 0 5 9 1 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel; Early Psychosis Intervention Network (EPINET) Review Meeting.                    

*Date:*                         February 21, 2019.                    

*Time:*                         9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center Building (NSC), 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Marcy Ellen Burstein, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 6143, MSC 9606, Bethesda, MD 20892-9606, 301-443-9699,                         *bursteinme@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.242, Mental Health Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 25, 2019.

Melanie J. Pantoja,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2019-00354 Filed 1-30-19; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
###### Editorial Note on Subpart F of Part 9701

#### Editorial Note:

At 73 FR 58435, Oct. 7, 2008, the application of subpart F to part 9701 was rescinded.

#### § 9701.614 Savings provision.

This subpart does not apply to adverse actions proposed prior to the date of an affected employee's coverage under this subpart.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Bureau of Industry and Security

          - 15 CFR Parts 732, 736, 740, 744, 752, 764, and 772
          - [Docket No. 040915266-4313-02]
          - RIN 0694-AC94

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.

# ACTION:

Proposed rule; reopening of comment period. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice reopens the comment period on a proposed rule that would revise the knowledge definition and the “red flags” guidance as well as create a safe harbor from knowledge based violations in the Export Administration Regulations.

# DATES:

Comments must be received by December 15, 2004.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Send comments on this proposed rule to: The Federal eRulemaking Portal:                         *http://www.regulations.gov,*                         via e-mail to                         *rpd2@bis.doc.gov,*                         fax them to 202-482-3355, or on paper to Regulatory Policy Division, Office of Exporter Services, Room 2705, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230. Refer to Regulation Identification Number 0694-AC94 in all comments.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        For further information regarding this proposed rule, contact: William Arvin, Office of Exporter Services, at                         *warvin@bis.doc.gov,*                         fax 202-482-3355 or telephone 202-482-2440.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On October 13, 2004, the Bureau of Industry and Security published a proposed rule that would revise the Export Administration Regulations in three ways: Revise the knowledge definition, revise the “red flags” guidance; and create a safe harbor from certain knowledge based violations. The deadline for public comments was November 12, 2004 (69 FR 60829). The Bureau is now reopening the comment period until December 15, 2004, to allow the public more time to comment on this proposed rule.

Dated: November 9, 2004.

Eileen Albanese,

Director, Office of Exporter Services.

[FR Doc. 04-25309 Filed 11-12-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-33-M
### §7505. Repayment for failure to satisfy requirements of agreement

(a) In General.—An individual who receives educational assistance under the scholarship program under this chapter shall repay to the Secretary an amount equal to the unearned portion of such assistance if the individual fails to satisfy the requirements of the agreement entered into under section 7504 of this title, except in circumstances authorized by the Secretary.

(b) Amount of Repayment.—The Secretary shall establish, by regulations, procedures for determining the amount of the repayment required under this section and the circumstances under which an exception to the required repayment may be granted.

(c) Waiver or Suspension of Compliance.—The Secretary shall prescribe regulations providing for the waiver or suspension of any obligation of an individual for service or payment under this chapter (or an agreement under this chapter) whenever—

(1) noncompliance by the individual is due to circumstances beyond the control of the individual; or

(2) the Secretary determines that the waiver or suspension of compliance is in the best interest of the United States.

(d) Obligation as Debt to United States.—An obligation to repay the Secretary under this section is, for all purposes, a debt owed the United States. A discharge in bankruptcy under title 11 does not discharge a person from such debt if the discharge order is entered less than five years after the date of the termination of the agreement or contract on which the debt is based.

(Added Pub. L. 111–163, title III, §302(a), May 5, 2010, 124 Stat. 1148.)
**EXHIBIT 31**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**
**SECTION 302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
I, Dennis M. Tack, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports onForm 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respectof periods included in the year covered by this annual report, ofVolkswagen Credit Auto Master Owner Trust, Series 2000-1;  2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as awhole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omitto state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annualreport;  3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing informationrequired to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the poolingand servicing, or similar, agreement for inclusion in these reports isincluded in these reports;  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by theservicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement andbased upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required underthat agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer hasfulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and  5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to theservicer’s compliance with the minimum servicing standards based uponthe report provided by an independent public accountant, afterconducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single AttestationProgram for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in thepooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in thesereports.   March 29, 2004  /s/ Dennis M. Tack   Name: Dennis M. Tack Title: Controller, VW Credit, Inc.
### [§3771. Repealed. Pub. L. 107–95, §5(d)(3), Dec. 21, 2001, 115 Stat. 918]

Section, added Pub. L. 105–368, title VI, §601(a), Nov. 11, 1998, 112 Stat. 3342; amended Pub. L. 106–400, §2, Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1675, defined terms "veteran", "homeless veteran", and "homeless individual", for purposes of this subchapter.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Tatonka Oil and Gas, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2007, as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Sothi Thillairajah, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      to
      my knowledge that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Tatonka Oil and Gas, Inc. and will be retained by Tatonka Oil and Gas, Inc.
      and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.





Date:
                March 22, 2007
            By:*/s/ SOTHI THILLAIRAJAH*
              Sothi
                  ThillairajahChief
                Financial Officer