alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 34.1

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors

HSBC Finance Corporation:

 

We have examined management’s assessment, included in the accompanying “Report on Compliance With Applicable Servicing Criteria Pursuant To Item 1122 of Regulation AB Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934” (Exhibit 33.1) that HSBC Finance Corporation (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB (Servicing Criteria)applicable to the servicing of asset backed securitization transactions backed by receivables generated by accounts originated under the HSBC Finance Corporation Union Plus® program, as described in Schedule I of Exhibit 33.1 (the Applicable Servicing Criteria ), as of and for the period from September 15, 2006 (date of issuance of the initial asset-backed securitization transaction covered by this report) throughDecember 31, 2006.  Exhibit 33.1 identifies the individual asset-backed securitization transactions (the Covered Transactions) defined by management as part of their assessment. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment about the Company’s compliance based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)****and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Covered Transactions, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Covered Transactions, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.  Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by theCompany during the period covered by this report.  Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Company complied with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the period September 15, 2006 through December 31, 2006 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

 

Chicago, Illinois

March 5, 2007
### SUBCHAPTER III—SERVICES FOR FACILITIES
§ 705.3 Commencing an investigation. ( a ) Upon request of the head of any government department or agency, upon application of an interested party, or upon motion of the Secretary, the Department shall immediately conduct an investigation to determine the effect on the national security of the imports of any article.
( b ) The Secretary shall immediately provide notice to the Secretary of Defense of any investigation initiated under this part.
[47 FR 14693, Apr. 6, 1982. Redesignated at 54 FR 601, Jan. 9, 1989, and amended at 63 FR 31623, June 10, 1998]
### SERVED: October 9, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF GRANDE AVIATION, LLC. FAADOCKETNO. [TO BEASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA 2014- 0545 

### AMENDED PROCEDURAL ORDER We do not anticipate reaching this case priorto January 2015. Unless specifically changedherein all prior orders remain in effect. WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the following procedural schedule: 1. On or before January 9, 2015, the parties shall conclude all discovery including, but not limited to, depositions, document production, responses to production requests and/or interrogatories. Ifthe parties cannotresolve a discovery dispute they shall submitthe dispute to the undersigned for resolution in a timely manner; 2. Theparties shall be preparedto presentthis case at a hearing on or after January 9, 2015, subjectto the availability ofcourtroom facilities. The specific date and time for the hearing will be forthcoming in a separate Order.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service ListSERVICE LIST- BY 

### U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 WilburWright Building-Suite2W1000 1

KentS. Jackson, Respondent's Counsel 21628 Midland Dr. Shawnee, KS 66218 TEL: 913-338-1700 FAX: 913-338-1755 ONECOPY.

Gayle E. Townsend, Complainant's Counsel Federal Aviation Administration CentralRegion ACE-7 DOT Building, Room 506 901 Locust St. Kansas City, MO 64106-2641 TEL: 816-329-3766 FAX: 816-329-3771 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-0545 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 2
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# 09/14/2011 - August 2011 Report on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206.

Accession Number: ML112490141

Date Released: Monday, September 19, 2011

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML112490124 - August 2011 Report on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206. (3 page(s), 9/14/2011)
    - ML112490132 - Enclosure to the August 2011 Report on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206. (30 page(s), 9/14/2011)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-10-00803-CV

In re Hino Electric Power Company, Inc. and Hino Electric Holding Company, L.P.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relators Hino Electric Power Company, Inc. and Hino Electric Holding Company,

L.P. filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for temporary relief. See Tex. R. App.

P. 52.8, 52.10. On December 3, 2010, we granted the motion for temporary relief and stayed the

proceedings at the trial court pending our resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus. Having

reviewed the petition, the response filed by the real parties in interest, the relators’ reply, the sur

reply filed by the real parties in interest, and the record, we dissolve our stay and deny the petition

for writ of mandamus. 

 

David Puryear, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Pemberton

Filed: January 21, 2011
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a conference call of the Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana and Mississippi Advisory Committees will convene at 1:30 p.m. and adjourn at 3:30 p.m. on Wednesday, December 15, 2004. The purpose of the conference call is to plan for future activities in 2005.

This conference call is available to the public through the following call-in number: 1-800-659-8290, access code 29789882. Any interested member of the public may call this number and listen to the meeting. Callers can expect to incur charges for calls not initiated using the supplied call-in number or over wireless lines and the Commission will not refund any incurred charges. Callers will incur no charge for calls using the call-in number over land-line connections. Persons with hearing impairments may also follow the proceedings by first calling the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-977-8339 and providing the Service with the conference call number.

                    To ensure that the Commission secures an appropriate number of lines for the public, persons are asked to register by contacting Jo Ann Daniels of                           ( print page 67699)                        the Central Regional Office, 913-551-1400 and TDD number 913-551-1414, by 3 p.m. on Thursday, December 9, 2004. The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the Commission.                

Dated at Washington, DC, November 8, 2004.

Ivy L. Davis,

Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.

[FR Doc. 04-25683 Filed 11-18-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
### §511. Decisions of the Secretary; finality

(a) The Secretary shall decide all questions of law and fact necessary to a decision by the Secretary under a law that affects the provision of benefits by the Secretary to veterans or the dependents or survivors of veterans. Subject to subsection (b), the decision of the Secretary as to any such question shall be final and conclusive and may not be reviewed by any other official or by any court, whether by an action in the nature of mandamus or otherwise.

(b) The second sentence of subsection (a) does not apply to—

(1) matters subject to section 502 of this title;

(2) matters covered by sections 1975 and 1984 of this title;

(3) matters arising under chapter 37 of this title; and

(4) matters covered by chapter 72 of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 102–83, §2(a), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 388.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Prior section 511 was renumbered section 1511 of this title.

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 211(a) of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 102–83, §2(a).

#### **Court Rules**

#### Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

Writ of mandamus abolished in United States district courts, but relief available by appropriate action or motion, see rule 81, Title 28, Appendix, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Industry Buried 

Piping Activities

Maria Korsnick

C t ll ti Constellation

October 22, 2009
Introduction

• Integrity of buried piping systems 

is an important issue

• Buried piping leaks

– Can affect system operation

– May have radiological 

considerations (tritium)

– Possible environmental concerns

– Financial consequence

– No significant safety events to-date

• Increased industry focus is being 

driven by high standards, safe and 

reliable plant operation 
Introduction

• For the last several years industry 

has increased its focus on buried 

piping integrity 

– EPRI 

• Ongoing research

• Buried pipe initiative - 2007

• Buried Piping Program Guidelines -

2008

– INPO 

• SER in 2006

• Focus area in 2007

– NEI Ground Water Protection 

Initiative in 2007

• Industry has a number of activities 

underway
Agenda

Industry/NRC Meeting on Buried Pipe 

October 22, 2010

TIME SUBJECT PRESENTER

1:00 Opening Remarks

•Introductions

•Meeting objectives

M Korsnick, 

Constellation

NRC

1:15 Approach to responding to Chairman’s tasking memo NRC

1:30 NACE input NACE

1:45 EPRI’s Buried Pipe Initiative

•Available documents and other information

B Clark, EPRI

2:30 Overview of EPRI/BPIG Recommended Program B Clark, EPRI

3:15 Overview of the Buried Pipe Integrity Group (BPIG) D Smith, Duke

3:45 Break

4:00 INPO review of plant buried pipe programs INPO review of plant buried pipe programs J Sears J Sears, INPO

4:30 Summary and Conclusions M Korsnick, 

Constellation

4:45 Future Activities and Actions J Riley, NEI

NRC
### §8102. Protection of Federal Government buildings in District of Columbia

The Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury may prohibit—

(1) a vehicle from parking or standing on a street or roadway adjacent to a building in the District of Columbia—

(A) at least partly owned or possessed by, or leased to, the Federal Government; and

(B) used by law enforcement authorities subject to their jurisdiction; and

(2) a person or entity from conducting business on property immediately adjacent to a building described in paragraph (1).

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1205.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8102 | 40:137. | Pub. L. 104–132, title VIII, §803, Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1305. |

Section
§ 1500.40 Establishment and membership. ( a ) The Board is hereby established to carry out a program of generic promotion, research, and education regarding concrete masonry products. The Board shall consist of manufacturers and of not fewer than 15 and not more than 25 members appointed by the Secretary, from nominations submitted as set forth in § 1500.41. No employee of an industry trade organization exempt from tax under paragraph (3) or (6) of section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 representing the concrete masonry industry or related industries shall serve as a member of the Board and no member of the Board may serve concurrently as an officer of the board of directors of a national concrete masonry products industry trade association.
( b ) The initial Board and all subsequent Boards, unless modified by the Board as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, shall be subject to the following: ( 1 ) To ensure fair and equitable representation of the concrete masonry products industry, the composition of the Board shall reflect the geographical distribution of the manufacture of concrete masonry products in the United States, the types of concrete masonry products manufactured, and the range in size of manufacturers in the United States.
( 2 ) No company or its affiliates shall have more than two members on the Board.
( c ) To the extent possible, dependent on the nominees submitted, the Secretary will strive to appoint at least two members from each region. Similarly, the Secretary will strive to appoint at least one member from each of the following districts:
( d ) Three years after the assessment of concrete masonry units commences pursuant to implementation of this Order, and at the end of each three-year period thereafter, the Board, subject to the review and approval of the Secretary, shall, if warranted, recommend to the Secretary the reapportionment of the Board membership to reflect changes in the geographical distribution of the manufacture of concrete masonry products and the types of concrete masonry products manufactured. Additionally, at any time, the Board may make recommendations to the Secretary to modify the composition of the regions and districts set forth in paragraph (c) of this section.
No. I-07-054 

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331 

October 19, 2007

ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING BOARD ESTABLISHED 

TO HANDLE INDIAN POINT LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION PROCEEDING 

A three-judge board has been established to review requests for a hearing on the license 

renewal application for the Indian Point nuclear power plant, located in Buchanan (Westchester 

County), N.Y. Should a hearing regarding the application take place, the board would also 

conduct that proceeding. 

The board is drawn from the Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Panel (ASLBP), which is 

a judicial component of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) tasked with conducting all 

licensing and other hearings as directed by the presidentially appointed Commission that 

oversees the NRC. The ASLBP operates independently of the NRC technical staff. The judges 

named by ASLBP Chief Administrative Judge E. Roy Hawkens to preside over the Indian Point 

proceeding are: Lawrence G. McDade, who will serve as chair; Dr. Richard E. Wardwell; and 

Dr. Kaye D. Lathrop. Brief biographical information for the judges is available at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/organization/panel-members.html . 

Most boards are composed of one judge who is qualified in conducting administrative 

proceedings, who is a lawyer, and two judges who have technical qualifications appropriate to 

the issues in the proceedings, who are scientists or engineers. 

Under NRC regulations, the original operating license for a nuclear power plant has a 

term of 40 years. The license may be renewed for up to an additional 20 years if NRC 

requirements are met. The current operating licenses for Indian Point Units 2 and 3 expire, 

respectively, on Sept. 28, 2013, and Dec. 12, 2015. 

Entergy’s license renewal application for Indian Point was received by the NRC on April 

30, 2007. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region I 

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406 

E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov
The deadline for the receipt of requests for a hearing on the application is Nov. 30, 2007. 

 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
NRC BEGINS SPECIAL INSPECTION AT RHODE ISLAND ATOMIC ENERGY 

COMMISSION RESEARCH REACTOR

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has begun a special inspection at the Rhode Island 

Atomic Energy Commission’s research reactor, following a reported potential radiation

overexposure of one of its workers.

The Rhode Island research reactor reported the potential overexposure on Oct. 25 

(event report # 47375 will be available on the NRC website) in which an employee entered the 

facility’s dry gamma exposure room to calibrate a radiation probe as part of an experiment the 

facility was conducting. 

The licensee indicated that based on its staff estimates, the employee received approximately 

2.5 rem (about half of the annual regulatory limit of 5 rem) total effective dose equivalent and 

estimated that radiation dose rate in the room was approximately 30 rem per hour. The 

circumstances meet the criteria for conducting a special inspection. The area was posted as a high 

radiation area and the reactor was shut down at the time and remains secured. The licensee's 

investigation is ongoing. 

Since the event report, the actual dose measured 0.115 rem – significantly lower than 

originally estimated.

NRC inspectors are on-site responding to this event at the research facility and they will stay 

on to lead the special inspection. The inspectors will seek to understand the circumstances 

surrounding the event and its probable causes, including conditions preceding the event, 

chronology, equipment performance, precursors, human factors considerations, quality assurance 

considerations and radiological considerations.

A written report of the special inspection will be issued about 30 days following the 

completion of the inspection. It will be available on the NRC website. The NRC’s predecessor, the 

Atomic Energy Commission, originally licensed the Rhode Island Atomic Energy Commission 

Research Reactor to operate in 1964.

###

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-204 October 26, 2011
News releases are available through a free listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES link 

on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to 

NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.
### §7268. Availability of proceedings

(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, all decisions of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims and all briefs, motions, documents, and exhibits received by the Court (including a transcript of the stenographic report of the hearings) shall be public records open to the inspection of the public.

(b)(1) The Court may make any provision which is necessary to prevent the disclosure of confidential information, including a provision that any such document or information be placed under seal to be opened only as directed by the Court.

(2) After the decision of the Court in a proceeding becomes final, the Court may, upon motion of the appellant or the Secretary, permit the withdrawal by the party entitled thereto of originals of books, documents, and records, and of models, diagrams, and other exhibits, submitted to the Court or the Court may, on its own motion, make such other disposition thereof as it considers advisable.

(c)(1) The Court shall prescribe rules, in accordance with section 7264(a) of this title, to protect privacy and security concerns relating to all filing of documents and the public availability under this subsection of documents retained by the Court or filed electronically with the Court.

(2) The rules prescribed under paragraph (1) shall be consistent to the extent practicable with rules addressing privacy and security issues throughout the Federal courts.

(3) The rules prescribed under paragraph (1) shall take into consideration best practices in Federal and State courts to protect private information or otherwise maintain necessary information security.

(Added Pub. L. 100–687, div. A, title III, §301(a), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4117, §4068; renumbered §7268, Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §402(b)(1), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 238; amended Pub. L. 102–82, §8(2), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 377; Pub. L. 105–368, title V, §512(a)(1), Nov. 11, 1998, 112 Stat. 3341; Pub. L. 110–389, title VI, §602, Oct. 10, 2008, 122 Stat. 4177.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2008—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 110–389 added subsec. (c).

1998—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 105–368 substituted "Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims" for "Court of Veterans Appeals".

1991—Pub. L. 102–40 renumbered section 4068 of this title as this section.

Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 102–82 substituted "may, upon motion of the appellant or the Secretary," for "shall" and "or the Court" for "before the Court".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1998 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 105–368 effective on first day of first month beginning more than 90 days after Nov. 11, 1998, see section 513 of Pub. L. 105–368, set out as a note under section 7251 of this title.