alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 218 (Friday, November 12, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 65367]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25132]



========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
week.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 218 / Friday, November 12, 2004 / 
Rules and Regulations

[[Page 65367]]



DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2004-18822; Airspace Docket No. 04-ACE-48]


Modification of Class D Airspace; and Modification of Class E 
Airspace; Salina, KS

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of the direct final 
rule which revises Class D and Class E airspace at Salina, KS.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, January 20, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Randolph, Air Traffic Division, 
Airspace Branch, ACE-520C, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal 
Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: 
(816) 329-2525.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on September 24, 
2004 (69 FR 57169). The Federal Register subsequently published a 
correction to the direct final rule on October 4, 2004 (69 FR 59303). 
The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-
controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse 
public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no 
adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effective on January 20, 2005. No adverse comments were 
received, and thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule 
will become effective on that date.

    Issued in Kansas City, MO, on November 1, 2004.
Anthony D. Roetzel,
Acting Area Director, Western Flight Services Operations.
[FR Doc. 04-25132 Filed 11-10-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Editorial Note on Part 20
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear at 68 FR 51355, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 20.10 Compliance reviews. ( a ) DOC may conduct compliance reviews and pre-award reviews or use other similar procedures that will permit it to investigate and correct violations of the Act and these regulations. DOC may conduct such review even in the absence of a complaint against a recipient. The review may be as comprehensive as necessary to determine whether a violation of the Act and these regulations has occurred.
( b ) If a compliance review of pre-award review indicates a violation of the Act or these regulations, DOC will attempt to achieve voluntary compliance with the Act. If voluntary compliance cannot be achieved, DOC will arrange for enforcement as described in § 20.15.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T17:28:12-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
§ 891.106 Reconsideration. ( a ) *Who may file.* A retired employee may request OPM to reconsider its initial decision that he/she is not eligible to make an election or to receive a Government contribution under the part or that he/she may not enroll another individual as a family member.
( b ) *Initial OPM decision.* An OPM decision shall be considered an initial decision as used in § 891.106(a) of this part, when rendered by OPM in writing and stating the right to reconsideration. However, a decision initially rendered at the highest level of review available within OPM will not be subject to reconsideration.
( c ) *Reconsideration.* A request for reconsideration must be made in writing, must include the claimant's name, address, date of birth, claim number, if appropriate, and reasons for the request.
( d ) *Time limit.* A request for reconsideration of an initial OPM decision must be filed within 30 calendar days from the date of OPM's initial decision. OPM may extend the time limit on filing when the individual shows that he/she was not notified of the time limit and was not otherwise aware of it, or that he/she was prevented by circumstances beyond his/her control from making the request within the time limit.
( e ) *Final decision.* After reconsideration, OPM shall issue a final decision which shall be in writing and shall fully set forth the findings and conclusions of OPM.
[45 FR 23637, Apr. 8, 1980]
(May 9, 1949.)

#### Acreage Estates Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Audrey Shelley et al., Defendants, and Edwin F. Shelley, Appellant.

In our opinion, respondent’s *843grantee did not agree to complete the road improvements within a reasonable time after the making of the contracts or the transfer of title, but rather within sixty days after the completion óf an apartment house to he constructed on the parcel. However, she may not escape her obligation and prevent the commencement of the sixty-day period by failing to complete or even commence construction of the apartment building. In view of the fact that the contract of November 5, 1947, did not specify a date for completion of the building, at which time the sixty-day period was to commence, we are of opinion that the parties thereto contemplated the construction of the building to be completed, and, therefore, the sixty-day period to commence, within a reasonable time after the making of that contract or the closing of title. The complaint does not allege that a period of sixty days" has elapsed after the passing of reasonable time for construction of the building, but only that more than a reasonable time has elapsed for completion of both the building and the road improvement. It is our further opinion that the complaint, as pleaded, does not show that the promise to improve the road went “ to the root of the contract ”, by any factual allegations. (See *Callanan*v. *Keeseville, Ausable Chasm, & Lake Champlain R. R. Co.,*199 N. Y. 268, 284.) Johnston, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
### §311. General Counsel

There is in the Department the Office of the General Counsel. There is at the head of the office a General Counsel, who is appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. The General Counsel is the chief legal officer of the Department and provides legal assistance to the Secretary concerning the programs and policies of the Department.

(Added Pub. L. 102–83, §2(a), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 383.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Prior section 311 was renumbered section 1111 of this title.

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 8(a) of Pub. L. 100–527, known as the Department of Veterans Affairs Act, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 102–83, §3(3).
----

Exhibit 31

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Cindy Watt, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB ofBeeston Enterprises Ltd. for the quarter ended March 31, 2005;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport.

4. The registrant's other certifying offering officers and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for theregistrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of thisquarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and c) presented in this quarterlyreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors andthe audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies in the design oroperation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant'sability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and haveidentified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internalcontrols; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internalcontrols; and 

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I haveindicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changesin internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affectinternal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.

 

 

Date: May 4, 2005                               

 

***/s/ Cindy Watt                                   ***

Cindy Watt

Secretary, CFO

----
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 21 (Thursday, January 31, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 775-776]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00340]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Bioengineering Sciences & Technologies 
Integrated Review Group; Modeling and Analysis of Biological Systems 
Study Section.
    Date: February 14-15, 2019.
    Time: 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Renaissance Long Beach Hotel, 111 East Ocean Blvd., Long 
Beach, CA 90802.
    Contact Person: Craig Giroux, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
BST IRG, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5150, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-
435-2204, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#abccc2d9c4ded3c8c5ebc8d8d985c5c2c385ccc4dd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1d7a746f7268657e735d7e6e6f33737475337a726b">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in 
advance of the meeting due

[[Page 776]]

to the partial Government shutdown of December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 25, 2019.
Sylvia L. Neal,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-00340 Filed 1-30-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2283

To provide for the creation of an additional category of laborers or mechanics 

known as helpers under the Davis-Bacon Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 2, 2003

Mrs. BLACKBURN (for herself, Mr. NORWOOD, and Mr. KING of Iowa) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL

To provide for the creation of an additional category of 

laborers or mechanics known as helpers under the DavisBacon Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Helpers Job Oppor5 tunity Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF DAVIS-BACON ACT. 

7 (a) GENERAL RULE.—Helpers of laborers and me8 chanics shall be considered to be a separate classification 

9 of laborers or mechanics for purposes of subchapter IV 
2

•HR 2283 IH 

1 of chapter 31 of title 40, United States Code (40 U.S.C. 

2 3141 et seq.), commonly known as the Davis-Bacon Act. 

3 A helper of a laborer or mechanic shall be paid the pre4 vailing wage of helpers of laborers or mechanics employed 

5 on projects which are of a character similar to the project 

6 on which the helper is employed and which are in the same 

7 city, town, or other subdivision of the State (or District 

8 of Columbia) in which the helper is employed. 

9 (b) DEFINITION.—For purposes of subsection (a), 

10 the term ‘‘helper’’ means a semi-skilled worker (other than 

11 a skilled journeyman mechanic) who—

12 (1) works under the direction of and assists a 

13 journeyman; 

14 (2) under the journeyman’s direction and su15 pervision, performs a variety of duties to assist the 

16 journeyman, such as preparing, carrying, and fur17 nishing materials, tools, equipment, and supplies, 

18 maintaining them in order, cleaning and preparing 

19 work areas, lifting, positioning, and holding mate20 rials or tools, and other related semi-skilled tasks as 

21 directed by the journeyman; and 

22 (3) may use tools of the trade at and under the 

23 direction and supervision of the journeyman.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Bureau of Labor Statistics 

The seventh meeting of the Federal Economic Statistics Advisory Committee will be held on December 14, 2004 in the Postal Square Building, 2 Massachusetts Avenue NE., Washington, DC. A meeting that had been scheduled for June 11, 2004, which would have been the Committee's seventh meeting, was canceled because that date was declared a national day of mourning for former President Ronald Reagan and Federal offices were closed. 

The Federal Economic Statistics Advisory Committee is a technical committee composed of economists, statisticians, and behavioral scientists who are recognized for their attainments and objectivity in their respective fields. Committee members are called upon to analyze issues involved in producing Federal economic statistics and recommend practices that will lead to optimum efficiency, effectiveness, and cooperation among the Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis and Bureau of the Census. 

The meeting will be held in Meeting Rooms 1 and 2 of the Postal Square Building Conference Center. The schedule and agenda for the meeting are as follows: 

9 a.m. Opening session 

9:45 a.m. Alternative measures of household income 

                    1 p.m. Priorities for future meetings                           ( print page 67609)    

1:30 p.m. Response rates and nonresponse in establishment surveys 

3:45 p.m. Development of an Employment Cost Index (ECI) excluding workers earning incentive pay 

4:45 p.m. Conclude (approximate time) 

The meeting is open to the public. Any questions concerning the meeting should be directed to Margaret Johnson, Federal Economic Statistics Advisory Committee, on Area Code (202) 691-5600. Individuals with disabilities, who need special accommodations, should contact Ms. Johnson at least two days prior to the meeting date. 

Signed at Washington, DC the 3rd day of November 2004. 

Kathleen P. Utgoff, 

Commissioner of Labor Statistics. 

[FR Doc. 04-25597 Filed 11-17-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-24-P
NRC MONITORS EVENTS AT BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT AFTER 

LOSS OF OFFSITE POWER AND UNUSUAL EVENT DECLARATION

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is monitoring the situation at the Browns 

Ferry nuclear power plant after the site lost offsite power early Wednesday evening due to 

severe storms that damaged power lines in the area. 

The NRC is monitoring the event through the NRC resident inspectors at the site and in 

the Atlanta regional office. The plant is operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority near Athens, 

Ala., about 32 miles west of Huntsville.

The three units at the Browns Ferry plant automatically shut down after losing offsite 

power Wednesday evening. One of the plant's diesel generators was out of service for 

maintenance, but the other seven started to power the units’ emergency loads. Plant operators 

and TVA line crews are working to restore offsite power to all three units. Safety systems have 

operated as needed.

TVA officially notified the NRC of the situation soon after it happened, but the agency's 

senior resident inspector was in one of the plant's control rooms when power was lost. He was 

able to observe plant activities as well as provide status reports to the NRC staff manning the 

incident response center in Atlanta. TVA declared an unusual event, the lowest of the four NRC 

emergency classification levels, just after 6 p.m. EDT.

 

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No: II-11-030

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416

 

April 27, 2011

E-mail: OPA2.Resource@nrc.gov
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     IN CONNECTION WITH THE ACCOMPANYING QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB OF
CRV MANAGEMENT INC. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2003, I, KENT MACKAY,
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF CRV MANAGEMENT INC.
HEREBY CERTIFY PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND
BELIEF, THAT:

     1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,
          2003, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the period ended June 30, 2003, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CRV
          Management Inc.

Dated:  August 14, 2003

CRV Management Inc.


By: /s/ Kent MacKay
-------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
**AD Economic Evaluation**



### Docket No . FAA - 20 15 - 2119 Directorate ID : 2015 - SW - 005 - AD Helicopter Model: Agusta S.p.A Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 34 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to prevent blade failure and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 143,000 Labor per Helicopter ( 1 work hour X $85 for inspection) $ 85
Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $143,085 Total US Fleet Cost Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Martin Crane