alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
B.C.D. 02-78

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Santa Fe Terminal Services, Inc.

NOV 1 2 2002

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning

the continuing status of Santa Fe Terminal Services, Inc. (SETS) (B.A. 

No. 4774) as an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C.

§ 231, et seq.) (RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45

U.S.C. § 351, et seq.) (RUIA). SETS was ruled to be an employer under

the RRA and RUIA effective January 2, 1974.

Mr. Alan M. Annis, Assistant Director of Taxes for the Burlington

Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company, reported that SETS business

activities ceased in the early 1990’s. He further advised that SETS is a

corporate shell and has no employees and no on-going operations. He

has no information on the exact date on which business activities ceased

and he advised that there is no information available as to the

disposition of any SETS assets. RRB records show that the last report

of employee compensation for SETS was for the fourth quarter of 1992.

Based on the information set forth above, it is the determination of the

Railroad Retirement Board that Santa Fe Terminal Services, Inc.

ceased being an employer covered under the RRA and RUIA as of the

close of business on December 31, 1992, the last day of the last year in

which its employees were reportedly compensated.

BA# 4774
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 22

- 00045

- CV

Bertha Villarreal v. Aida Guerrero Villarreal
On Appeal from the 389th District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. C

- 4394

- 20

- H

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having consid ered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed

. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decision certified below for observance. March 9, 2023
BISNIS Search for Partners, July 14, 1997

----

The Business Information Service for the Newly Independent States(BISNIS) has created the Search for Partners program to help U.S.companies find investment opportunities in the expanding markets ofthe Newly Independent States (NIS) of the former Soviet Union.
The opportunities are provided solely as an informational service anddo not represent an endorsement by the U.S. Department ofCommerce. Verification of these leads is the responsibility of thereader.
**Index of Investment Opportunities:**
1. Kyrgyzstan - Scientific Research and Medicine Services
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T17:25:01-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 248 (Friday, December 28, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67373-67374]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-28157]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express Negotiated Service 
Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service\TM\.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to

[[Page 67374]]

the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification 
Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 28, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 20, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express Contract 69 to Competitive 
Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. 
MC2019-61, CP2019-66.

Elizabeth Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2018-28157 Filed 12-27-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### L. H. Brink and Ignatz Pilat, trading as Brink and Pilat, Plaintiffs in Error, v. M. Finkelstein and Sam Rosenthal, Defendants in Error.

Gen. No. 20,835.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Thomas F. Scully, Judge, presiding.

Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1915.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed January 11, 1916.

Statement of the Case.

Action by L. H. Brink and Ignatz Pilat, trading as Brink and Pilat, against M. Finkelstein and Sam Bosenthal for goods sold and delivered by plaintiffs to defendants at plaintiffs’ request. From a judgment for defendants, after a trial by the court, plaintiffs appeal.

Plaintiffs were commission merchants and Finkelstein was a dealer in poultry. Bosenthal was Finkelstein’s real estate agent and accommodated him at times by giving him checks for cash. The goods sued for were sold and delivered to Finkelstein between December 9 and 14, 1912. Plaintiffs had previously sold and delivered to him similar goods and received payments therefor in the form of checks signed by Bosenthal. It was claimed by plaintiffs that before the sale and delivery of said goods, Bosenthal had promised to pay for them over the telephone. Bosenthal denied that he had made any such promise, or that he ever talked over the telephone to or saw plaintiffs until after the transactions sued on were had, when he endeavored to effect a settlement. He said that when he gave the checks in question it was for cash given him by Finkelstein to the amount of plaintiffs’ bills. He was corroborated by Finkelstein.

Q. J. Chott, for plaintiffs in error.

*400Abstract of the Decision.

Frauds, Statute of, § *126*—when evidence sufficient to sustain finding that promise not original.*Where a merchant sold goods to another at different times and customarily received the check of another person in payment, *held,*in action against the buyer and such other person for goods sold and delivered, in which the only question was whether such other person had made an original promise to pay for the goods, that a finding by the court that such promise had not been made was sustained by the evidence.

Nicholas J. Pritzker, for defendant in error Sam Rosenthal.

Mr. Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### November 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r 

### 137158 Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, J ustices 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137158 COA: 277139 Wayne CC: 06-012193-01 REGINALD LEE KIRKWOOD, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 10, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d1117 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 25, 2008

Clerk
NRC Perspective

• NRC is an independent government agency

• Protect public health and safety and the environment in 

commercial uses of radioactive material

• Where appropriate, use risk-informed, performance based 

regulations to meet NRC’s mission

• Seeking stakeholder input on proposed rulemaking for 

reprocessing facilities

• NRC does not set national policy for reprocessing, but will 

provide a stable framework in response to evolution of national 

policy and licensee needs

• Provide framework fully informed by latest scientific knowledge 

and stakeholder input 

• Provide flexibility for future technological developments

• Does not constitute endorsement of reprocessing
Who would write the regulations?

• Lead: Division of High Level Waste in Office of Nuclear 

Material Safety and Safeguards (NMSS)

• Rulemaking and Technical Support: Office of Federal and 

State Materials and Environmental Management Programs 

(FSME)

• Interoffice collaboration including

• Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response (NSIR)

• Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (RES)

• Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards (FCSS, 

former lead office)
What is the process?

• SECY-09-0082 identified 19 gaps in current regulations to be 

resolved for licensing to occur

• Draft regulatory basis document and rulemaking 

recommendation due to Commission in September 2011

• Parallel rulemaking efforts close some gaps

• Commission will provide rulemaking direction

• If recommended for rulemaking

• Final gap document

• Rulemaking plan

• Environmental Impact Statement

• Regulatory Guidance
What is the timeline?
Where are we now?

• Draft regulatory basis document development and SECY 

paper planned for September 2011

• Technical staff proposed closures to gaps

• Proposed gap closures presented in this meeting for input

• Overview presentations

• Summaries provided online

• Roundtable discussions

• Opportunities for public comment

• Stakeholder interactions considered in writing of final draft

• Final draft of Environmental Topical Report (FSME) planned 

for November 2011
Stakeholder Views

• Input from previous public meetings

• Examples of written input considered include 

• NUREG-1909 (from ACNW&M)

• NEI White Paper

• Correspondence from Union of Concerned Scientists

• Letters received from AREVA and GE-Hitachi in Spring 2011

• DOE seminars on reprocessing (aqueous and 

electrochemical)

• Preliminary recommendations from Blue Ribbon Commission
June 21-22, 2011 Meeting

• Booklet provided with summaries of gap issue and proposed 

closures or alternatives

• Specific questions for which stakeholder input is sought; will 

provide focus of discussions

• Further comments can be submitted on www.regulations.gov

until July 7th

• Feedback form about this meeting
Exhibit 10.4


RELIANT ENERGY, INC.

2002 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN


AMENDMENT TO

NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AWARD AGREEMENT


THIS
AMENDMENT TO NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AWARD AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”)
is entered into and effective as of May 16, 2007, by and between Reliant
Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) and Joel V. Staff (the “Optionee”).


WHEREAS,
on March 12, 2003, the Company granted to the Optionee an Option to
purchase shares of common stock of the Company under the Reliant Energy, Inc.
2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan, formerly known as the Reliant Resources, Inc.
2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan, pursuant to a Nonqualified Stock Option Award
Agreement (“Agreement”), a copy of which is attached hereto; and


WHEREAS,
the Company and the Optionee desire to amend the Agreement to limit the option
exercise period upon Retirement;


NOW,
THEREFORE, effective as of the day and year first above
written, the parties agree to amend the Agreement as follows:


1.             Section 3(c) of the Agreement is
hereby amended to read as follows:


“(c)         Termination Due to Retirement.  Upon termination of service as a Director by
the Optionee because of Retirement, the Option shall expire upon the earlier of
(i) the second anniversary of the date of termination of the Optionee’s
service as a Director of the Company or (ii) the expiration of the Option
Period.”


2.             Section 3(d) of the Agreement is
hereby amended to read as follows:


“(d)         Termination of Service for Other
Reasons.  Upon termination of service
as a Director by the Optionee for any reason other than death, Disability or
Retirement, the portion of the Option not exercisable shall expire immediately,
and the portion of the Option exercisable upon termination shall expire upon
the earlier of (i) the second anniversary of the date of termination of
the Optionee’s service as a Director of the Company or (ii) the expiration of
the Option Period.”



 1
 









 


	
   

  	
  RELIANT ENERGY, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Mark M. Jacobs

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Mark
  M. Jacobs

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  President
  and Chief Executive Officer

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  OPTIONEE

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  /s/
  Joel V. Staff

  
	
   

  	
  Joel
  V. Staff

  



 



 2
### §220702. Organization

(a) Federal Charter.—United States Submarine Veterans of World War II (in this chapter, the "corporation"), a nonprofit corporation incorporated in New Jersey and Colorado, is a federally chartered corporation.

(b) Expiration of Charter.—If the corporation does not comply with any provision of this chapter, the charter granted by this chapter expires.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1479.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 220702(a) | 36:1801. | Nov. 20, 1981, Pub. L. 97–83, §§1, 15 (last sentence), 16, 95 Stat. 1094, 1096. |
| 220702(b) | 36:1814 (last sentence).36:1815. | |

Section

36:1815.

This section is substituted for the source provisions for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary words.
#### § 846.713 Former spouse consent requirement.

An election of FERS coverage cannot become effective unless the election is made with the written consent of any former spouse(s) entitled to benefits under part 838 of this chapter.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1557-DR]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (FEMA-1557-DR), dated September 19, 2004, and related determinations.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

November 3, 2004.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Under Secretary for Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, James N. Russo, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this declared disaster.

This action terminates my appointment of Thomas Davies as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

                        (The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 Individuals and Households Program—Other Needs, 97.036, Public                               ( print page 67157)                            Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)                    

Michael D. Brown,

Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security.

[FR Doc. 04-25379 Filed 11-15-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer  Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of American Bank Holdings, Inc.(The “Company”), Hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:

 

(a)          The Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB ofthe Company for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2005 filed on the date hereofwith the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “report”) fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b)         Information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 

Date: August 12, 2005

 
| /s/John M. Wright                                 |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
| John M. Wright                                    |
| Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to American Bank Holdings, Inc. and will be retained byAmerican Bank Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### § 272.5 Preemption.

In accordance with section 4(g) of the Federal Energy Management Improvement Act of 1988 (15 U.S.C. 5001(g)), the provisions of section 4(a) of that Act and the provisions of this part supersede any provision of State or local laws or ordinances which provides for markings or identification inconsistent with the provisions of section 4 of that Act or the provisions of this part.

[54 FR 19358, May 5, 1989. Redesignated at 78 FR 4765, Jan. 23, 2013]
1The Honorable Donald J. Stohr, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-4268

___________

Charles Armstrong, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Eastern

* District of Missouri.

Walgreens, Inc.; Walgreens Health *

Plus, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: January 6, 2000

 Filed: January 18, 2000

___________

Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Charles Armstrong appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing his pro se

complaint against Walgreens, Inc. and Walgreens Health Plus, Inc. under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B). We conclude Mr. Armstrong’s appeal is untimely because his notice

of appeal was not filed within thirty days of the dismissal order. See Fed. R. App. P.

4(a)(1)(A) (notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after entry of judgment or
-2-

order being appealed); Campbell v. White, 721 F.2d 644, 645 (8th Cir. 1983) (notice

of appeal received 32 days after judgment’s entry was untimely and could not be

considered as motion for extension of time under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as untimely.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Mark
Gatto, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President of ICON Capital Corp., the
Manager of the Registrant, in connection with the Quarterly Report of ICON
Income Fund Ten, LLC (the “LLC”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”) certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the LLC.




Date: November
12, 2009





/s/Mark
Gatto


Mark
Gatto


Co-Chief
Executive Officer and Co-President


ICON
Capital Corp.


Manager
of ICON Income Fund Ten, LLC
§ 27.108 IRB functions and operations. ( a ) In order to fulfill the requirements of this policy each IRB shall: ( 1 ) Have access to meeting space and sufficient staff to support the IRB's review and recordkeeping duties;
( 2 ) Prepare and maintain a current list of the IRB members identified by name; earned degrees; representative capacity; indications of experience such as board certifications or licenses sufficient to describe each member's chief anticipated contributions to IRB deliberations; and any employment or other relationship between each member and the institution, for example, full-time employee, part-time employee, member of governing panel or board, stockholder, paid or unpaid consultant;
( 3 ) Establish and follow written procedures for: ( i ) Conducting its initial and continuing review of research and for reporting its findings and actions to the investigator and the institution;
( ii ) Determining which projects require review more often than annually and which projects need verification from sources other than the investigators that no material changes have occurred since previous IRB review; and
( iii ) Ensuring prompt reporting to the IRB of proposed changes in a research activity, and for ensuring that investigators will conduct the research activity in accordance with the terms of the IRB approval until any proposed changes have been reviewed and approved by the IRB, except when necessary to eliminate apparent immediate hazards to the subject.
( 4 ) Establish and follow written procedures for ensuring prompt reporting to the IRB; appropriate institutional officials; the department or agency head; and the Office for Human Research Protections, HHS, or any successor office, or the equivalent office within the appropriate Federal department or agency of ( i ) Any unanticipated problems involving risks to subjects or others or any serious or continuing noncompliance with this policy or the requirements or determinations of the IRB; and
( ii ) Any suspension or termination of IRB approval.
( b ) Except when an expedited review procedure is used (as described in § 27.110), an IRB must review proposed research at convened meetings at which a majority of the members of the IRB are present, including at least one member whose primary concerns are in nonscientific areas. In order for the research to be approved, it shall receive the approval of a majority of those members present at the meeting.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under Control Number 0990-0260)