alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-11-0089 - "Options for Proceeding with Future Level 3 Probabilistic Risk Assessment Activities"

Accession Number: ML11090A039

Date Released: Wednesday, July 13, 2011

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML11090A041 - SECY-11-0089 - "Options for Proceeding with Future Level 3 Probabilistic Risk Assessment Activities" (12 page(s), 7/7/2011)
    - ML11090A042 - SECY-11-0089 - Enclosure 1 - Options for Proceeding with Future Level 3 PRA Activities (31 page(s), 7/7/2011)
    - ML11144A077 - SECY-11-0089 - Enclosure 2 - The Structure and Evolution of Probabilistic Risk Assessment and Risk-Informed Regulation (18 page(s), 7/7/2011)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
B.C.D. 03-41

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION MAY 0 8 2003

Ludington & Northern Railway Company.

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning

the continuing status of Ludington & Northern Railway Company

(L&N) (B.A. No. 4237) as an employer under the Railroad Retirement

Act (45 U.S.C. § 231, et seq.) (RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment 

Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. § 351, et seep) (RUIA). L&N has been an

employer under the RRA and RUIA with service creditable from

July 18, 1901.

L&N was abandoned on June 15, 1982 after Sand Company, its owner,

closed the sand mine from which L&N hauled sand to its interchange

with the C&O (now CSX). From that date through 1989, L&N filed

reports with the Board which stated that it had no employees. L&N

reported earnings for employees from 1990 through 1994. L&N

reported zero employees for 1995 through 1997, when it filed its final

report to the Board. Effective March 11, 1997, an abandonment

exemption was granted by the Surface Transportation Board (STB)

whereby L&N was permitted to abandon its entire 2.54 mile line of

railroad (STB Finance Docket No. AB-488X, decided March 3, 1997).

There is evidence that L&N had one switch engine which was removed 

from its railroad line after the sand mine closed in 1982. A recent

business report shows that the corporate status of L&N is “inactive —

certificate of dissolution”.

Section 202.11 of the Board’s regulations provides that:

The employer status of any company or person shall

terminate whenever such company or person loses any of the

characteristics essential to the existence of an employer

status.

BA#4237
-2-

Ludington & Northern Railway Company.

Based on the information summarized above, it is the determination of

the Railroad Retirement Board that Ludington & Northern Railway

Company ceased being an employer under the RRA and RUIA on

March 11, 1997, the effective date of the abandonment exemption for

L&N.

V. M. Speakman, Jr.
BISNIS Search for Partners, July 28, 1997

----

The Business Information Service for the Newly Independent States (BISNIS) has created theSearch for Partners program to help U.S. companies find investment opportunities in theexpanding markets of the Newly Independent States (NIS) of the former Soviet Union.
The opportunities are provided solely as an informational service and do not represent anendorsement by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Verification of these leads is theresponsibility of the reader.
Index of Investment Opportunities:
1. Armenia - Canned Food Products
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7486

ANDREW NICHOLS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

EARL BESHEARS, Warden; PRISON HEALTH SERVICES,

INCORPORATED; DOCTOR CALDERON; JOSEPH GRIFFIN,

M.D.; KEVIN JOHNSON; DAVID BLOOM, Director,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.

(CA-95-374-WMN)

Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 4, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andrew Nichols, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Kushner Kline, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Joseph Barry

Chazen, Gina Marie Smith, MEYERS, BILLINGSLEY, SHIPLEY, RODBELL &

ROSENBAUM, Riverdale, Maryland; Daniel Karp, Kevin Bock Karpinski,

ALLEN, JOHNSON, ALEXANDER & KARP, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Nichols v. Beshears, No. CA-95-374-WMN (D. Md. Sept. 1,

1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 2003.0 Office, mailing address, telephone number, and hours. ( a ) The office of the Committee is at room 729, 1800 G Street NW., Washington, DC 20506.
( b ) All communications to the Committee should be addressed to the “Secretary, Trade Policy Staff Committee, Office of the Special Representative for Trade Negotiations, room 729, 1800 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20506.”
( c ) The telephone number of the office of the Committee is (202) 395-3395.
( d ) The regular hours of the office of the Committee are from 9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. on each business day, Monday through Friday.
### §90107. Service of process

The foundation shall have a designated agent to receive service of process for the foundation. Notice to or service on the agent, or mailed to the business address of the agent, is notice to or service on the foundation.

(Added Pub. L. 107–252, title VI, §601(a), Oct. 29, 2002, 116 Stat. 1721, §152607; renumbered §90107, Pub. L. 113–237, §3(c)(6)(B), Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 2840.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–237 renumbered section 152607 of this title as this section.
SOUTH CENTRAL TENNESSEE RAILROAD COMPANY

SOUTH CENTRAL TENNESSEE RAILROAD CORPORATION

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

This is the decision of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning

the continued status of the South Central Tennessee Railroad

Company (SCTRC) as an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act

(RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (RUIA) and the

new status of the South Central Tennessee Railroad Corporation

(SCTR) as an employer under the Acts. The SCTRC was ruled to be an

employer effective July 1, 1978.

SCTRC ceased operations and its employees last performed

compensated service on December 31, 1993, when it merged into the

SCTR. On January 1, 1994 SCTR began actual operations and first

compensated its employees. According to the agreement of merger

between SCTRC and SCTR, SCTRC ceased its corporate existence on the

effective date of the merger which was December 31, 1993 . SCTR has

replaced SCTRC and now operates on the same line and uses the same

equipment as the former SCTRC.

Based on the information summarized above, it is the Board's 

determination that the South Central Tennessee Railroad Company

ceased being an employer under the RRA and RUIA on December 31,

1993 . It is also the Board's determination that the South Central 

Tennessee Railroad Corporation became an employer under the Acts 

administered by the Board on January 1, 1994.

BCD 1995-71.1 BA # 2564
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-11-0005 - Proposed Final Safety Culture Policy Statement

Accession Number: ML103200087

Date Released: Thursday, January 13, 2011

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML103200282 - SECY-11-0005 - Proposed Final Safety Culture Policy Statement (8 page(s), 1/5/2011)
    - ML103200320 - Enclosure 1 to SECY-11-0005, Federal Register Notice - Final Safety Culture Policy Statement. (15 page(s), 1/5/2011)
    - ML103200347 - SECY-11-0005 - Enclosure 2 - Definition and Traits of a Positive Safety Culture (4 page(s), 1/5/2010)
    - ML103200356 - SECY-11-0005 - Enclosure 3 - Stakeholder Outreach Activities (5 page(s), 1/5/2011)
    - ML103200371 - SECY-11-0005 - Enclosure 4 - NEI/INPO Safety Culture Construct Validation Study (3 page(s), 1/5/2011)
    - ML103200378 - SECY-11-0005 - Enclosure 5 - Public Comments (8 page(s), 1/5/2011)
    - ML103200414 - SECY-11-0005 - Enclosure 6 - Implementation (4 page(s), 1/5/2011)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### § 919.500 What is the purpose of the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS)?

The *EPLS* is a widely available source of the most current information about persons who are excluded or disqualified from covered transactions.
§ 894.308 How do I establish the dependency of my recognized natural child? ( a ) Dependency is established for a recognized natural child who lives with the *enrollee* in a regular parent-child relationship, a recognized natural child for whom a judicial determination of support has been obtained, or a recognized natural child to whose support the *enrollee* makes regular and substantial contributions.
( b ) The following are examples of proof of regular and substantial support. More than one of the following proofs may be required to show support of a recognized natural child who does not live with the *enrollee* in a regular parent-child relationship and for whom a judicial determination of support has not been obtained: ( 1 ) Evidence of eligibility as a dependent child for benefits under other State or Federal programs;
( 2 ) Proof of inclusion of the child as a dependent on the *enrollee's* income tax returns;
( 3 ) Canceled checks, money orders, or receipts for periodic payments from the *enrollee* for or on behalf of the child.
( 4 ) Evidence of goods or services which show regular and substantial contributions of considerable value;
( 5 ) Any other evidence which OPM shall find to be sufficient proof of support or of paternity or maternity.
[78 FR 64879, Oct. 30, 2013, as amended at 88 FR 47749, July 25, 2023]
NRC ISSUES LICENSE TO TVA AUTHORIZING RECEIPT OF FRESH NUCLEAR FUEL 

FOR WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 2

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a license to the Tennessee Valley Authority 

(TVA) authorizing the receipt of fresh nuclear fuel for eventual use in the proposed Watts Bar 

Nuclear Plant Unit 2, located in Spring City, Tenn. 

The license, issued under NRC regulations at 10 CFR Part 70, authorizes TVA to receive, 

possess, inspect, and store 193 assemblies containing fresh nuclear fuel enriched up to 5 percent in 

the isotope uranium-235. The license does not authorize use of the fuel in a reactor – the NRC is 

currently reviewing TVA’s application for an operating license under 10 CFR Part 50 for Watts Bar 

Unit 2. The NRC expects to complete that review in 2012. 

Issuance of the license follows publication June 13 in the Federal Register of an 

Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact from the proposed licensing 

action. 

TVA applied for the Part 70 license on Nov. 12, 2009. TVA intends to store the fresh fuel in 

the fuel storage vault or spent fuel pool areas common to Units 1 and 2. The Part 70 license will 

remain effective until June 30, 2013, or when the Part 50 operating license takes effect if issued 

prior to that date. 

The NRC issued construction authorizations for Watts Bar Units 1 and 2 in 1973. In 1985, as 

construction of Unit 1 was nearing completion, the NRC identified several safety issues and TVA 

decided to delay completion of both units. Unit 1 completed construction, received its operating 

license and began commercial power production in 1996, and was the last new commercial nuclear 

power reactor to come online in the United States. In August 2007, TVA notified NRC that it 

intended to complete construction of Unit 2, and in March 2009, TVA supplemented its original 

operating license application for Unit 2. 

The license and the safety evaluation report documenting the technical review of the license 

application will be available through the NRC’s ADAMS document database at 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html using accession number ML110830153. 

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. 

E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC’s website. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-107 June 15, 2011
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Page 9 of 17

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(b)

                        KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 1999-A

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

Bank One, National Association              Bankers Trust Company
Fka, The First National Bank of Chicago     Four Albany Street
One Bank One Plaza, Suite 0126              New York, New York  10006
Chicago, IL  60670                          Attn: Corporate Trust & Agency Group
Attn: Corporate Trust Administration        Structured Finance
Phone: (312) 407-0192                       Phone: (212) 250-6501
Fax: (312) 407-1708                         Fax: (212) 250-6439

Key Bank USA, National Association
800 Superior Ave, 4th Floor
Cleveland, OH   44114
ATTN:  Senior Vice President
Key Education Resources
Phone: (216) 828-9342
Fax: (216) 828-9301

Pursuant to Section 4.09 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement among Key Bank USA,
National Association, as Seller and Administrator, KeyCorp Student Loan Trust
1999A, EFS as Servicer and The First National Bank of Chicago (nka, Bank One,
National Association), as Eligible Lender Trustee, dated as of January 1, 1999
(the "Agreement"), the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) a review of the
activities of EFS as Servicer from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2000,
and of its performance under the Agreement has been made, and (ii) to the best
of our knowledge, based on our review, EFS as Servicer has fulfilled all its
obligations under the Agreement throughout such period.

                                           EFS Services, Inc., Servicer

Date:   3/15/01                            By: /s/ Hollie Heider
    ------------                             -----------------------------
                                           Name:  Hollie Heider
                                           Title: Executive Vice President,
                                                  Operations
---

---

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

We, Rafi Amit, Chief Executive
Officer of Camtek Ltd., and Ronit Dulberg, Chief Financial Officer of Camtek Ltd., each
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report for Camtek Ltd. on Form 20-F for
the year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, an that information contained in
the Annual Report on Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Camtek Ltd.

Date: June 29, 2006

| |  | By: /s/ Rafi Amit
Rafi AmitChief Executive Officer
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | By: /s/ Ronit Dulberg
Ronit DulbergChief Financial Officer
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Camtek Ltd. and will be retained by
Camtek Ltd. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---

---
§ 900.709 Notice and consultation. ( a ) Programs and activities receiving OPM financial support shall take appropriate initial and continuing steps to notify participants, beneficiaries, applicants, and employees, including those with impaired vision or hearing, that it does not discriminate on the basis of handicap in violation of Section 504 and this subpart.
( b ) As appropriate, a recipient shall consult with interested persons, including handicapped persons or organizations representing handicapped persons, in achieving compliance with this subpart.
EXHIBIT A

 FILED IN 2nd COURT OF APPEALS FORT WORTH, TEXAS 12/19/2017 3:01:45 PM DEBRA SPISAK Clerk
RICHARD CHALKER, 

COURT OF APPEALS 

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH 

CASE NO. 02-17-00250-CV 

APPELLANT 

V. 

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, APPELLEE 

FROM THE 393RD illDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY 

TRIAL COURT NO. 15-04402-393 

RULE 11 AGREEMENT 

REGARDING APPELLEE NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC'S 

FIRST UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE APPELLEE'S BRIEF 

APPELLEE NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC ("Nationstar"), by and through its attorney of 

record, and APPELLANT RICHARD CHALKER ("Mr. Chalker"), by and through his attorney of 

record, ( collectively, "the Parties") enter this Rule 11 agreement to memorialize their agreement 

incident to the lawsuit, self-styled as above. The Parties agree to the following: 

1. The Parties acknowledge that this is a binding Rule 11 agreement under the provisions of

Rule 11 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

2. Appellant Chalker agrees to Appellee Nationstar's request for a thirty (30) day extension of

Nationstar's current due date of January 8, 2018 for filing its appellee brief in the abovecaptioned action.

3. The Parties agree and acknowledge that Appellee needs additional time to include thirty

(30) days beyond January 8, 2018 to February 7, 2018, to evaluate and consider

Appellant's pending settlement proposals for a possible resolution of this appeal.

Therefore, Appellant Chalker does not oppose Nationstar's motion for thirty (30) day

extension ofNationstar's due date for filing its brief to February 7, 2018.

RULE 11 AGREEMENT RE: APPELLEE'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF BRIEF DUE DATE 

Cause No. 02-17-00250-CV; Richard Chalker v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC Page I 
4. The Parties further agree that except as expressly stated herein, this Rule 11 agreement

does not place limitation on the claims, defenses, actions, positions or legal rights of the

parties in litigating the appeal, and the Parties agree that efforts to resolve this matter,

including but not limited to settlement discussions, meetings, and negotiations, shall

continue unabated.

Date: December 18, 2017 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ 

Elizabeth Chandler, SBN: 24097484 

echandler@mcguirewoods.com 

McGUIREW00DS LLP 

2000 McKinney A venue, Suite 1400 

Dallas, Texas 75201 

Telephone: 214.932.6400 

Facsimile: 214.932.6499 

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE 

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC 

Mark Lieberman, SBN: 12332520 

Mic358@hotmail.com 

LAW OFFICE OF MARK LIEBERMAN

1704 Pine Hills Rd. 

Corinth, Texas 76219 

Telephone: 817.305.3772 

Facsimile: 469.385.8823 

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT 

RULE 11 AGREEMENT RE: APPELLEE'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF BRIEF DUE DATE 

Cause No. 02-17-00250-CV; Richard Chalker v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC Page 2 

Elizabeth Chandler
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1956 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1956

 To amend part B of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 
 coverage of certain self-administered intramuscular and subcutaneous 
                   drugs under the Medicare Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 6, 2003

Mr. Greenwood (for himself, Mr. Waxman, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Gutierrez, 
   Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. Holt, Mr. Frost, Mr. McNulty, Mr. 
    Doyle, Mr. Kildee, Mr. Kennedy of Rhode Island, Mr. Owens, Ms. 
 Schakowsky, Ms. Slaughter, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Pallone, Mr. Israel, Mr. 
     Collins, Mr. Ferguson, Mr. Rangel, Mr. Engel, Mr. Leach, Mr. 
    Nethercutt, Mr. Bishop of New York, and Mr. Moran of Virginia) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
   Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and 
 Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend part B of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 
 coverage of certain self-administered intramuscular and subcutaneous 
                   drugs under the Medicare Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COVERAGE OF CERTAIN SELF-ADMINISTERED INTRAMUSCULAR AND 
              SUBCUTANEOUS DRUGS UNDER THE MEDICARE PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 1861(s)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395x(s)(2)) is amended --
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of subparagraph (U);
            (2) by inserting ``and'' at the end of subparagraph (V); 
        and
            (3) by adding at the end of the following new subparagraph:
            ``(W) in the case of a disease where an intramuscular 
        biological therapy has approval of the Federal Food and Drug 
        Administration for patient self-administration upon physician 
        determination of appropriateness and is covered under 
        subparagraph (A) or (B) of this paragraph, any intramuscular 
        and subcutaneous drug and biological with a similar approved 
        use by such Administration (including the same biological 
        delivered by intramuscular injection which is covered by either 
        such subparagraph) without regard to whether there is medical 
        or other supervision with respect to the administration of such 
        drug or biological;''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to drugs furnished on or after January 1, 2004.
                                 <all>
```