alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Irma Salinas

To: Goldsmith, Jason

Cc: Scott Lutz ; Glen Long
Subject: Chrome Platers info Requested from EPA

Date: Thursday, March 10, 2011 9:13:42 PM

Attachments: OS-3148.pdf OS-2733 thru 2736.pdf NTV-271.pdf NTV-522.pdf NTV-348.pdf NTV-634.pdf NTV-480.pdf NTV-742.pdf Plant 1794 NTV-708.pdf Plant 2371 OS-2766 thru 2769.pdf Plant 5474 NTV-644.pdf Plant 7546 April 10 2008 NTV-511.pdf

COC Eval.doc

COC Eval.doc

COC Eval.doc

Evaluation.doc

COC Eval.doc

COC Eval.doc

COC Eval.doc

COC Eval.doc

COC Eval.doc

COC Eval.doc

COC Eval.doc

COC Eval.doc

COC Eval.doc

COC Eval.doc

COC Eval.doc

COC Eval.doc

COC Eval.doc

COC Eval.doc

COC Eval.doc

COC Eval.doc

EPA List.xlsx List of Chrome Platers in Bay Area2Revised March2011.doc

Evaluation.doc

Evaluation.doc

Evaluation.doc

EVAL.doc

EVAL.doc

Jason,

I have provided source test data along with permit evaluations for the facilities. Please see

attached documents. The other information has been provided in the main document labeled:

List of Chrome Platers in Bay Area2 Revised March 2011 and I also have provided a spread sheet

with this information for easier to read format.

. Please note that I was unable to obtain

dimensions of the tanks and rectifier capacity as each source is permitted to have amp-hr per year

usage limit. Nor was I able to provide you with a list of exempt sources that use electroplating. I

have only provided information that was on the list.

If you need additional information, please email or call me and I will see if it can be provided.

Sincerely,

Irma Salinas
(415) 749-5110
STATE OF LOUISl"NA

I

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

VANESSA ARCHILLE

VERSUS

RENNA F. CAMEL

I

NO. 2022 CW 1271

MARCH 13, 2023

In Re: Renna F. Camel, applying

Judicial District Court, 

No. 720117. 

for ' supervisory writs, 19th

Parish of East Baton Rouge, 

BEFORE: THERIOT, CHUTZ, AND HESTER, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

O\.cJ) 

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT

MRT

WRC

CHH
### §7502. Application and acceptance

(a) Application.—(1) To apply and participate in the scholarship program under this chapter, an individual shall submit to the Secretary an application for such participation together with an agreement described in section 7504 of this title under which the participant agrees to serve a period of obligated service in the Department as provided in the agreement in return for payment of educational assistance as provided in the agreement.

(2) In distributing application forms and agreement forms to individuals desiring to participate in the scholarship program, the Secretary shall include with such forms the following:

(A) A fair summary of the rights and liabilities of an individual whose application is approved (and whose agreement is accepted) by the Secretary.

(B) A full description of the terms and conditions that apply to participation in the scholarship program and service in the Department.

(b) Approval.—(1) Upon the Secretary's approval of an individual's participation in the scholarship program, the Secretary shall, in writing, promptly notify the individual of that acceptance.

(2) An individual becomes a participant in the scholarship program upon such approval by the Secretary.

(Added Pub. L. 111–163, title III, §302(a), May 5, 2010, 124 Stat. 1147.)
| 1.     | Such      Amended Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31,      2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
| 2.     | The      information contained in such Amended Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the      period ended December 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects,      the financial condition and results of operations of Segway IV Corp. |

| By:    | /s/   Donny      SmithDonny      SmithChief Executive      OfficerChief Financial      Officer |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  |                                                                                                                    |

| Dated: | August      18, 2008 |
|--------|----------------------|
§ 2004.34 Submitting demands and requests. ( a ) *Where do I send a demand or request?* To make a demand or request for records, information or testimony you should write directly to the General Counsel. Heightened security delays mail delivery. To avoid mail delivery delays, we strongly suggest that you email your demand or request to *TOUHY@ustr.eop.gov .* The mailing address is General Counsel, Office of the United States Trade Representative, Anacostia Naval Annex, Building 410/Door 123, 250 Murray Lane SW., Washington, DC 20509. To ensure delivery, you should mark the subject line of your email or your envelope and letter “Touhy Request.”
( b ) *When should I submit it?* You should submit your demand or request at least 45 calendar days in advance of the date on which the records, information or testimony is needed.
( c ) *What must be included?* ( 1 ) A demand or request must include an affidavit or, if that is not feasible, a clear and concise statement by the party or his or her counsel summarizing the legal and factual issues in the proceeding and explaining how the records, information or testimony will contribute substantially to the resolution of one or more specifically identified issues.
( 2 ) A demand or request for testimony also must include an estimate of the amount of time that the employee will need to devote to the process of testifying (including anticipated travel time and anticipated duration of round trip travel), plus a showing that no document or the testimony of non-USTR persons, including retained experts, could suffice in lieu of the employee's testimony.
( d ) *Limits.* The General Counsel will limit any authorization for testimony to the scope of the demand, and the scope of permissible production of records and information to that set forth in the written authorization.
( e ) *Failure to meet requirements and exceptions.* USTR may oppose any demand or request that does not meet the requirements set forth in this subpart. The General Counsel may grant exceptions to the requirements in this subpart upon a showing of compelling need, to promote a significant interest of USTR or the United States, or for other good cause.
§ 875.201 Am I eligible as a Federal civilian or Postal employee? ( a ) If you are a Federal civilian or Postal employee whose current position conveys eligibility for Federal Employees Health Benefits under part 890 of this chapter, you are also eligible to apply for coverage, with the following exceptions: ( 1 ) If you are a District of Columbia employee or retiree, you are not eligible to apply for coverage, regardless of whether you are eligible for Federal Employees Health Benefits coverage. There is a related exception, however: D.C. government employees and retirees who were first employed by the D.C. government before October 1, 1987 are eligible to apply for coverage.
( 2 ) If you are a Tennessee Valley Authority employee or retiree, you are eligible to apply for coverage, even though you may not be eligible for Federal Employees Health Benefits coverage.
( 3 ) If you are a Non-Appropriated Fund (NAF) employee or retiree you are eligible to apply when the Secretary of Defense determines such eligibility for the NAF instrumentality that employs you, and you will be treated the same as a Federal civilian employee or retiree (as applicable) under this Part.
( b ) If you are a Federal civilian or Postal employee whose current position is excluded from Federal Employees Health Benefits eligibility under § 890.102 of this chapter, you are excluded from applying for coverage unless paragraph (a)(2) of this section applies.
( c ) If you are an annuitant reemployed by the Federal Government, you may apply for coverage as an employee.
[68 FR 5534, Feb. 4, 2003, as amended at 70 FR 30607, May 27, 2005]
FREIGHT INSURANCE IN THE NIS

----
§ 40.4 Administrative provisions on selection of participants and funding of costs. ( a ) Within the framework of the aforementioned Memorandum of Agreement, the Bureau of the Census will arrange at the request and expense of the Agency for International Development, a program for technical training of foreign participants in censuses and statistics. The Bureau of the Census will be furnished biographic materials, information about the training objectives including, where appropriate, each participant's education and experience, type of training desired, present and future positions with descriptions of duties, and the terms of the training project for each participant or group as far in advance of his arrival in the United States as possible.
( b ) The Bureau reserves the right to accept, based on biographical information to be furnished in advance, only those participants whom it finds qualified to make satisfactory use of its training facilities and resources. The Bureau would prefer to develop programs for foreign participants with substantive experience in the statistical activities of their home country.
( c ) Arrangements for security clearances, insurance, orientation, international travel, housing, and other administrative responsibilities will be the responsibility of AID under the provisions of the Memorandum of Agreement (Reference: Appendix II, Training of Foreign Nationals).
§ 890.111 Continuation of eligibility for former Federal employees of the Civilian Marksmanship Program. ( a ) A Federal employee who was employed by the Department of Defense to support the Civilian Marksmanship Program as of the day before the date of the transfer of the Program to the Corporation for the Promotion of Rifle Practice and Firearms Safety, and was offered and accepted employment by the Corporation as part of the transition described in section 1612(d) of Public Law 104-106, 110 Stat. 517, is deemed to be an employee for purposes of this part during continuous employment with the Corporation unless the individual files an election under § 831.206(c) or § 842.109(c) of this title. Such a covered individual is treated as if he or she were a Federal employee for purposes of this part, and of any other part within this title relating to the FEHB Program. The individual is entitled to the benefits of, and is subject to all conditions under, the FEHB Program on the same basis as if the individual were an employee of the Federal Government.
( b ) Cessation of employment with the Corporation for any period terminates eligibility for coverage under the FEHB Program as an employee during any subsequent employment by the Corporation.
( c ) The Corporation must withhold from the pay of an individual described by paragraph (a) of this section an amount equal to the premiums withheld from the pay of a Federal employee for FEHB coverage and, in accordance with procedures established by OPM, pay into the Employees Health Benefits Fund the amounts deducted from the individual's pay.
( d ) The Corporation must, in accordance with procedures established by OPM, pay into the Employees Health Benefits Fund amounts equal to any agency contributions required under the FEHB Program.
[74 FR 66567, Dec. 16, 2009]
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Annual Report of Speedhaul Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Andrew Norins, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Andrew Norins
--------------------------
Andrew Norins
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer

April 6, 2005
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 248

To amend the Public Health Service Act and the Homeland Security Act 

of 2002 to strike unrelated provisions concerning changes to the National 

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program and liability for vaccine manufacturers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2003

Mr. ALLEN (for himself, Mr. STARK, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr. 

MICHAUD, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. BERRY, Mr. DAVIS of Florida, Mr. 

KUCINICH, and Mrs. CAPPS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL

To amend the Public Health Service Act and the Homeland 

Security Act of 2002 to strike unrelated provisions concerning changes to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program and liability for vaccine manufacturers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 248 IH 

1 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO NA2 TIONAL VACCINE INJURY COMPENSATION 

3 PROGRAM. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2133 of the Public Health 

5 Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300aa–33) is amended to read as 

6 if sections 1714 through 1716 of Public Law 107–296 had 

7 not been enacted. Section 1717 of Public Law 107–296 

8 is repealed. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) is deemed to 

10 have taken effect instantly upon the enactment of Public 

11 Law 107–296. 

12 (c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—This Act and sections 

13 1714 through 1717 of Public Law 107–296 may not be 

14 construed as having any legal effect on any court pro15 ceeding or decision involving any issue with which such 

16 sections were concerned.

Æ
### §110306. Principal office

The principal office of the corporation shall be in the District of Columbia. However, the activities of the corporation are not confined to the District of Columbia but may be conducted throughout the States, territories, and possessions of the United States.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1370.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 110306 | 36:915(a). | Sept. 2, 1958, Pub. L. 85–903, §5(a), 72 Stat. 1739. |

Section

The word "various" is omitted as unnecessary.
§ 766.13 Hearings. ( a ) *Scheduling.* The administrative law judge, by agreement with the parties or upon notice to all parties of not less than 30 days, will schedule a hearing. All hearings will be held in Washington, D.C., unless the administrative law judge determines, for good cause shown, that another location would better serve the interests of justice.
( b ) *Hearing procedure.* Hearings will be conducted in a fair and impartial manner by the administrative law judge, who may limit attendance at any hearing or portion thereof to the parties, their representatives and witnesses if the judge deems this necessary or advisable in order to protect sensitive matter (see § 766.11 of this part) from improper disclosure. The rules of evidence prevailing in courts of law do not apply, and all evidentiary material deemed by the administrative law judge to be relevant and material to the proceeding and not unduly repetitious will be received and given appropriate weight.
( c ) *Testimony and record.* Witnesses will testify under oath or affirmation. A verbatim record of the hearing and of any other oral proceedings will be taken by reporter or by electronic recording, transcribed and filed with the administrative law judge. A respondent may examine the transcript and may obtain a copy by paying any applicable costs. Upon such terms as the administrative law judge deems just, the judge may direct that the testimony of any person be taken by deposition and may admit an affidavit or declaration as evidence, provided that any affidavits or declarations have been filed and served on the parties sufficiently in advance of the hearing to permit a party to file and serve an objection thereto on the grounds that it is necessary that the affiant or declarant testify at the hearing and be subject to cross-examination.
( d ) *Failure to appear.* If a party fails to appear in person or by counsel at a scheduled hearing, the hearing may nevertheless proceed, and that party's failure to appear will not affect the validity of the hearing or any proceedings or action taken thereafter.
#### J. C. Lyons Sons Co., Respondent, v. Firoz Realty Corporation, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

(Appeal No. 1.)

*1002No opinion. Present — Townley, Grlennon, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, J J.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region III

2443 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. III-11-023

Contact: Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil (630) 829-9663

June 30, 2011

E-Mail: OPA3.RegionIII@nrc.gov 

NRC NAMES NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR AT

MONTICELLO NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S Nuclear Regulatory Commission has selected Patricia Voss 

as the new resident inspector at the Monticello nuclear power plant in 

Monticello, Minn., approximately 40 miles northwest of Minneapolis.

Voss joined the NRC in Region III as a reactor engineer in 2007. 

Since joining the agency, she has completed a rigorous inspector 

qualification program and has participated in engineering inspections 

throughout the Midwest region. Most recently, Voss was acting resident 

inspector at the Perry and Davis-Besse nuclear power plants in Ohio. 

Voss graduated from the University of Michigan with a bachelor’s 

of science degree in nuclear engineering and radiological sciences.

“Patricia Voss is an excellent inspector with a firm commitment to safety. She will help 

the NRC fulfill its mission of protecting people and the environment by helping ensure the 

Monticello plant operates at the high standards set by the NRC,” said Region III Administrator 

Mark Satorius.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear plant site has at least two NRC resident inspectors who 

monitor the day-to-day activities at the plant. Voss joins Senior Resident Inspector Scott Thomas 

at the Monticello plant.

The Monticello resident inspectors can be reached at (763) 295-2066.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2501

To clarify the boundaries of Coastal Barrier Resources System Cape Fear 

Unit NC–07P. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 18, 2003

Mr. MCINTYRE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To clarify the boundaries of Coastal Barrier Resources 

System Cape Fear Unit NC–07P.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF CERTAIN COASTAL BAR4 RIER RESOURCES SYSTEM MAPS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The 2 maps subtitled ‘‘NC–07P’’, 

6 relating to the Coastal Barrier Resources System unit des7 ignated as Coastal Barrier Resources System Cape Fear 

8 Unit NC–07P, that are included in the set of maps enti9 tled ‘‘Coastal Barrier Resources System’’ and referred to 

10 in section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 
2

•HR 2501 IH 

1 U.S.C. 3503(a)), are hereby replaced by 2 other maps re2 lating to those units entitled ‘‘Coastal Barrier Resources 

3 System Cape Fear Unit, NC–07P’’ and dated February 

4 18, 2003. 

5 (b) AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary of the Interior 

6 shall keep the maps referred to in subsection (a) on file 

7 and available for inspection in accordance with the provi8 sions of section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act 

9 (16 U.S.C. 3503(b)).

Æ
ComEd Specification EM13050 - Dry-Type, Indoor, Three 

Specification Limiting Dimensions and Weight Curr

Catalog ID Capacity (kVA) Pri Volt (V) Sec Volt (V) Height (in.) Width (in.) Depth (in.) Weight (lbs) Height (in.) 

1336509 112.5 13200 208Y/120 52.0 48.0 29.5 2100 52.0 

1336559 112.5 13200 480Y/277 52.0 48.0 29.5 2100 52.0 1336510 150.0 13200 208Y/120 52.0 48.0 29.5 2400 52.0 1336560 150.0 13200 480Y/277 52.0 48.0 29.5 2400 52.0 1336512 225.0 13200 208Y/120 60.0 52.0 32.0 2800 60.0 1336562 225.0 13200 480Y/277 60.0 52.0 32.0 2800 60.0 1336513 300.0 13200 208Y/120 60.0 60.0 36.0 3550 60.0 1336563 300.0 13200 480Y/277 60.0 60.0 36.0 3550 60.0 1336515 500.0 13200 208Y/120 66.0 60.0 36.0 4350 66.0 1336565 500.0 13200 480Y/277 66.0 60.0 36.0 4350 66.0
#### In the Matter of Charles A. Birney, Appellant, against Joseph V. O’Leary, as Comptroller, Arthur W. Brandt, as Superintendent of Public Works, and Grace A. Reavy et al., as Commissioners of Civil Service of the State of New York, Respondents.

All concur.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN LUIS CANO-VILLA, AKA 

Alejandro Luis Garcia-Corral, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent. 

No. 14-73354 

Agency No. A205-991-793 

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 11, 2017**

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Juan Luis Cano-Villa, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of 

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his motion to reopen removal 

proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 19 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-73354 

discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Singh v. Holder, 771 F.3d 647, 650 

(9th Cir. 2014). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Cano-Villa’s motion to 

reopen and administratively close proceedings, where he did not establish prima 

facie eligibility for the underlying relief sought. See Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 

F.3d 592, 599 (9th Cir. 2006) (failure to establish a prima facie case for the 

underlying relief sought is one of at least three independent grounds on which the 

BIA can deny a motion to reopen).

We will not review the IJ’s determination regarding jurisdiction because the 

BIA did not rely on that ground. See Owino v. Holder, 771 F.3d 527, 531 (9th Cir. 

2014) (court’s review is limited to the BIA’s decision unless the IJ’s opinion is 

expressly adopted (citation omitted)).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.