alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-09-00703-CV

Hays Consolidated Independent School District, Appellant

v.

Kimberly Drake, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY, 207TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 09-0603, HONORABLE CHARLES R. RAMSAY, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an interlocutory appeal from a district court order denying a plea to the

jurisdiction. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(8) (West 2008). The parties have

filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal, advising that they have compromised their differences in

the underlying cause. The parties further request that we render judgment effectuating the parties’

settlement agreement, specificallythat we “render a take-nothing judgment and dismissthis appeal.”

Given the limited scope of our subject-matter jurisdiction in this interlocutory appeal, we grant

the joint motion only to the extent of rendering judgment dismissing this appeal. See Tex. R. App.

P. 42.1(a)(2)(A).

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Pemberton

Dismissed on Joint Motion

Filed: December 10, 2010
---

Section 1350 Certifications

CERTIFICATE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

I, Jerry Dibble, a Director and President, who also
performs the function of Principal Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of Capital Mineral Investors, Inc. (the
Corporation), certify that the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report")
for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof:

|1. | fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and                                       
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                    
|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Corporation.

|(Signature) | /s/ Jerry
      Dibble                                                                           | 
|----------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|            | Jerry Dibble                                                                                       | 
|(Title)     | President and Director (also performs the function
      of Principal Executive Officer, Principal
|            | Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)                                                | 
|            |                                                                                                    | 
|(Date)      | August 13, 2008                                                                                    | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Corporation and will be retained by the Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
### §15734. Great Lakes Authority

The region of the Great Lakes Authority shall consist of areas in the watershed of the Great Lakes and the Great Lakes System (as such terms are defined in section 118(a)(3) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1268(a)(3))), in each of the following States:

(1) Illinois.

(2) Indiana.

(3) Michigan.

(4) Minnesota.

(5) New York.

(6) Ohio.

(7) Pennsylvania.

(8) Wisconsin.

(Added Pub. L. 117–328, div. O, title IV, §401(b)(1), Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5228.)
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2452 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2452

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 339 Hicksville Road in Bethpage, New York, as the ``Brian C. Hickey 
                        Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 2003

Mr. King of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 339 Hicksville Road in Bethpage, New York, as the ``Brian C. Hickey 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BRIAN C. HICKEY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 339 Hicksville Road in Bethpage, New York, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Brian C. Hickey Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Brian C. 
Hickey Post Office Building.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bas Consulting, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB/A2 for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Alva
Schoomer, Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date:  January 29, 2004              By: /s/ B. Alva Schoomer
                                        ----------------------
                                     Name:  Dennis Crowley
                                    Title:  B. Alva Schoomer
                                            (Principal Executive, Financial
                                             and Accounting Officer)
§ 700.63 Letters of understanding. ( a ) A letter of understanding is an official action that may be issued in resolving special priorities assistance cases to reflect an agreement reached by all parties (*e.g.,* the Department of Commerce, the Determination Department, the Delegate Agency, the supplier, the customer).
( b ) A letter of understanding is not used to alter scheduling between rated orders, to authorize the use of priority ratings, to impose restrictions under this regulation, or to take other official actions. Rather, letters of understanding are used to confirm production or shipping schedules which do not require modifications to other rated orders.
[49 FR 30414, July 30, 1984. Redesignated at 54 FR 601, Jan. 9, 1989, as amended at 79 FR 47570, Aug. 14, 2014; 89 FR 58976, July 22, 2024]
---

Exhibit 4.4

AGREEMENT

THIS AGREEMENT is dated for reference the 5th day
  of March, 2002.

BETWEEN:

LINUXWIZARDRY SYSTEMS, INC. 
  #120, 3011 Viking Way 
  Richmond, BC V6V 1W1

("Linux")

OF THE FIRST PART

AND:

TERYL RESOURCES CORP.#120, 3011 Viking Way 
  Richmond, BC V6V 1W1

("Teryl")

OF THE SECOND PART

WHEREAS:

|A. | Linux owns a 50% interest in 30 claims
        in Fairbanks, Alaska called the Fish Creek Claims;
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                  
|B. | Teryl agrees to joint venture the Fish
        Creek Claims;                                     

NOW THEREFORE in consideration of the mutual covenants
  and conditions set forth herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:

|1. | 200,000 treasury shares of Teryl upon
        signing and approval by the regulatory bodies.                                                                                                       
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|2. | Linux will hold a 5% net royalty interest
        until $200,000 U.S. has been received or Teryl pays a payment of $500,000
        U.S. within one year after production of the Fish Creek Claims.
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|3. | Teryl agrees to expend $500,000 U.S.
        within three years from the date of this Agreement.                                                                                                   

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed
  this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.

|LINUXWIZARDRY SYSTEMS, INC. |  | TERYL RESOURCES CORP.   
|--------------------------- |  | ------------------------
|                            |  |                         
|                            |  |                         
|/s/
      John Robertson    |  | /s/
      John Robertson
|Signature                   |  | Signature               
|                            |  |                         
|John
      Robertson        |  | John Robertson          
|Print Name                  |  | Print Name              
|                            |  |                         
|President                   |  | President               
|Title                       |  | Title                   

---
### §150102. Organization

(a) Federal Charter.—National Academy of Public Administration (in this chapter, the "corporation"), incorporated in the District of Columbia, is a federally chartered corporation.

(b) Expiration of Charter.—If the corporation does not comply with any provision of this chapter, the charter granted by this chapter expires.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1386.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 150102(a) | 36:2301. | Apr. 10, 1984, Pub. L. 98–257, §§1, 15 (last sentence), 16, 98 Stat. 127, 129. |
| 150102(b) | 36:2314 (last sentence).36:2315. | |

Section

36:2315.

This section is substituted for the source provisions for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary words.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 16, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 67203]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25418]



[[Page 67203]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Notice of Intent To Request Renewal From the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) of One Current Public Collection of Information

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 
et seq.), the FAA invites public comment on one currently approved 
public information collection which will be submitted to OMB for 
renewal.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before (January 18, 2005).

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed or delivered to the FAA at the 
following address: Ms. Judy Street, Room 612, Federal Aviation 
Administration, Standards and Information Division, APF-100, 800 
Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20591.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Judith D. Street at the above 
address, on (202) 267-9895, or by e-mail at: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9ed4ebfae7b0cdeaecfbfbeadef8ffffb0f9f1e8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4a003f2e3364193e382f2f3e0a2c2b2b642d253c">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid OMB control number. Therefore, the FAA solicits 
comments on the following current collection of information. Comments 
should evaluate the necessity of the collection, the accuracy of the 
agency's estimate of the burden, the quality, utility, and clarity of 
the information to be collected, and possible ways to minimize the 
burden of the collection.
    1. 2120-0570, Certificated Training Centers-Simulator Rule, Part 
142. To determine regulatory compliance, there is a need for airmen to 
maintain records of certain training and recency of experience; there 
is a need for training centers to maintain records of students' 
training, employee qualification and training, and training program 
approvals. Information is used to determine compliance with airman 
certification and testing to ensure safety. The current estimated 
annual reporting burden is 6,822 hours.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 8, 2004.
Judith D. Street,
FAA Information Collection Clearance Officer, APF-100.
[FR Doc. 04-25418 Filed 11-15-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov 

No. III-03-065 October 9, 2003

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC SEEKS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE 

OF DAVIS-BESSE PUMP PROBLEM 

The NRC staff has asked for additional information from FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating

Company to determine the safety significance of a design problem with high pressure emergency

cooling system pumps at the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, located near Oak Harbor, Ohio.

In October of last year, the utility discovered the design deficiency which could affect the high

pressure injection pumps under certain accident conditions. These pumps would provide cooling water

to the reactor during a loss-of-coolant accident in which the pressure in the reactor remained high. 

Other pumps would be available at lower reactor pressures.

If required to operate for an extended period, the pumps would recirculate water that collected

in the bottom of the reactor containment. The water may contain debris that could affect the pumps

because of the design deficiency, resulting in excessive vibration or overheating.

NRC inspection findings are evaluated using a four-level scale of safety significance, ranging

from "green" for a finding of very low significance, through "white" and "yellow" to "red," for a

finding of high safety significance.

The NRC’s preliminary evaluation determined that the safety significance of the pump problem 

was “greater than green,” meaning that the design deficiency involved more than very low safety

significance. However, the analysis varied greatly depending on the assumptions used.

As a result, the NRC staff has provided the utility with the opportunity to provide additional

information which would permit a more refined analysis of the safety significance. FirstEnergy may

also request a meeting, called a regulatory conference, to discuss the safety significance.

The NRC staff will consider any additional information submitted by FirstEnergy in making its

final determination of the safety significance of the high pressure injection pump issue.

FirstEnergy is planning to modify the two high pressure injection pumps to correct the design

deficiency before any decision on whether or not the plant may resume operations. The NRC staff

must approve restart of the plant, which has been shut down since February of last year.
- 2 -

The letter to the utility on the safety significance will be available from the NRC’s Region III

Office of Public Affairs and in the NRC’s online document library, known as ADAMS, at

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html – enter the accession number ML032810667 in

the search box. Assistance in using the ADAMS online library is available from the NRC’s Public

Document Room staff at 800/397-4209

 # # #
```

[House Report 107-353]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                    107-353

======================================================================

 
WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 
          3338, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2002

                                _______
                                

  December 20 (legislative day, December 19), 2001.--Referred to the 
                House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

   Mrs. Myrick, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 324]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 324, by a non-record vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution waives all points of order against the 
conference report to accompany H.R. 3338, the Department of 
Defense Appropriations Act, 2002, and against its 
consideration. The resolution further provides that the 
conference report shall be considered as read.

                                  

```
### §15751. Authorization of appropriations

(a) In General.—There is authorized to be appropriated to each Commission to carry out this subtitle $33,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2019 through 2023.

(b) Administrative Expenses.—

(1) In general.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), not more than 10 percent of the funds made available to a Commission in a fiscal year under this section may be used for administrative expenses.

(2) Limited funding.—In a case in which less than $10,000,000 is made available to a Commission for a fiscal year under this section, paragraph (1) shall not apply.

(Added Pub. L. 110–234, title XIV, §14217(a)(2), May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1482, and Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title XIV, §14217(a)(2), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 2244; amended Pub. L. 113–79, title VI, §6207, Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 861; Pub. L. 115–334, title VI, §6304(e), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4752.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 enacted identical sections. Pub. L. 110–234 was repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

#### Amendments

2018—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–334 substituted "$33,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2019 through 2023" for "$30,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2008 through 2018".

2014—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 113–79, §6207(1), substituted "2018" for "2012".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 113–79, §6207(2), designated existing provisions as par. (1) and inserted heading, substituted "Except as provided in paragraph (2), not more than" for "Not more than", and added par. (2).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the first day of the first fiscal year beginning after June 18, 2008, see section 14217(d) of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as a note under section 15101 of this title.
1 TheHonorable Donald J. Stohr, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-4268

___________ Charles Armstrong, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Missouri. Walgreens, Inc.; Walgreens Health * Plus, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: January 6, 2000 Filed: January 18, 2000

___________ Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Charles Armstrong appeals the district court’s 1 order dismissing his pro se complaint against Walgreens, Inc. and Walgreens Health Plus, Inc. under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We conclude Mr. Armstrong’s appeal is untimely because his notice of appeal was not filed within thirty days of the dismissal order. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1 )(A) (notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after entry of judgment or-2-

order being appealed) ; Campbell v. White , 721 F.2d 644, 645 (8th Cir. 1983) (notice of appeal received 32 days after judgment’s entry was untimely and could not be consideredas motion for extension of time under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as untimely. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTERST OF

SEBASTIAN AGUILERA,

A CHILD. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 22

- 00083

- CV

Appeal from the

383rd Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2010AG3943)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 3 1ST DAY OF MARCH, 2023.

MELISSA GOODWIN

, Justice

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Soto and Goodwin, J.J.