alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7857

DEE DEIDRE FARMER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CA-96-699-H)

Submitted: July 10, 1997 Decided: July 22, 1997

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dee Deidre Farmer, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Farmer

v. North Carolina State Bar, No. CA-96-699-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 22,

1996). Appellant's motion for injunction is denied. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Levitt Corporation (the Company) for the
quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, George P. Scanlon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ George P. ScanlonName:
    George P. ScanlonTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer
Date: May 9, 2005
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT JESSICA N. CARDEN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-892 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed March 21, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Neil A. Roddenbery, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Lisa B. Lott, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KHOUZAM, MORRIS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
OFFICE 0F:THE AmORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

0-O.wuccC 

-- 

p-t-t. ’ 

reoeire4 
Hon. A. M. 'Jhrnndy, page z 
474 

Bon. A. M. Turney,, page 5 

The Con8tltutlon protide. that the duration of 

011 offlaes not fix.4 thereby &all never exceed two yeare. 

But it also erprassly fixes the term of oertaln speoifled 

ofilcee at from tw to mix pSar8, and It autlwrfzes the 

Leglslatur. to fir the tbrma of oertaln other oifloers and 

members of out&in boards at not exaee4i~ elx years. The 

first of these oormtitutlonal provisions (Art. 16, sec. 30) 

fixes the terms of all offloers at two ye&r@ where they are 

not otherwlae fixed by the oonstitutlon or by a statute or 

mun1a1pal or4lMnoer 

Thero’h 90 statute requiring 4oputloa to take 

the oath of offloe l a o h Jenuuy, the only requirement being 

that muoh otfloer, whether l leoted or appointed, Shall, 

berofe enter* P 

enbsorlbe~tho oa tr 

P tho-dut;.s~of his ,offi.e, take and 

pro6ulbed by law. 

In Mswu to yourfilwu Question youare respeotfully adtl8.4 that It Is the~oplaiomo? t&ii3 department 

that when a Ueputy mherlff irr a~lnted.adl takes em4 subscribes to the oath prssclrib.4:by~l.a~ before entering upon 

the dUt1.s Of hi. ofi he 18 not required t&take the 

oath of off180 '%it& Jiumuy but the Sirat o&h ~taken is suffieht6 4url8g Tqlo e nor his TpriEoipu; -:mJ-, rucrh 

40$&f m?uXd ,be iequir@$ to take ‘rtnb SUblWziBe~ the oath of 

of$fw pzom6rlkd’by law when reappoint84 .hy ~klCphSmolpel 

wkem ~~'iQOi~ta.t~l~~or'~~~~~~;8ander a 

new prin.lpui 

Yom ~800& quostian has been an-d by this dopartneot Ill inion UO. O-91 rhioh holds that in OOlUltie8 

h&ring a po 3 lrtiaioi b8i ~han~tOBthwaaB4 lnlmb1tant.e 

tk4~okultf ~ad~m8088ar and eallbotor of taxes is entitled, 

un4.r Arti. SBOZ to o&y one ahlo? deputy at a salary of 

$laQo.oc pu 8makr 

we ~3bliukue~~a~y or op%nson m. O-91 for 

formatlenr ~4. ooimonIamb, 

vatmumg that :fho ?wsga4g tally enswere 

lnqulry, we rcmalu 

your lnl-m 

BY
No. IV-11-015

Contact: Victor Dricks: (817) 860-8128

 Lara Uselding: (817) 276-6519

 

 April 21, 2011

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

 

NRC TO HOLD REGULATORY CONFERENCE WITH NEBRASKA 

PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT ON COOPER NUCLEAR STATION

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a regulatory conference with 

officials from the Nebraska Public Power District on April 27 to discuss issues related to the 

Cooper nuclear plant fire protection plan. The plant is located 23 miles south of Nebraska City, 

Neb. 

The conference, which is open to public observation, will begin at 8 a.m. in NRC’s 

Region IV office at 612 E. Lamar in Arlington, Texas. Conferees will discuss an apparent 

violation with a preliminary low to moderate safety significance associated with motor operated 

valves that may not have performed in some specific fire scenarios. Previously, the licensee 

received a finding related to this issue and failed to fully correct it.

NRC inspectors reported that the licensee’s back-up procedures to operate valves that are 

part of the emergency core cooling system (ECCS) may not prove effective in the event of a fire. 

The ECCS is used to cool the reactor core in the event of a fire or accident. In response to the 

finding, the licensee took immediate steps to change procedures to operate the valves manually, 

if needed. 

The NRC evaluates regulatory performance at commercial nuclear plants with a color

coded process which classifies regulatory findings as either green, white, yellow or red, in 

increasing order of safety significance. The NRC’s preliminary evaluation determined that 

the apparent violation was “white,” meaning it has low to moderate safety significance.

A phone bridge is available to members of the public by calling 1-800-952-9677 and 

asking to be transferred to the meeting. Members of the NRC staff will be available to answer 

questions from members of the public after the business portion of the meeting.

No decision on the final significance, the apparent violation or any contemplated

enforcement action will be made during the conference. Those decisions will be made by NRC

officials at a later time.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125

Telephone: (817) 860-8128

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov
The NRC inspection report is available through the agency’s electronic reading room at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and ML 110760579. Help in accessing these 

documents is available from the NRC Public Document Room staff by calling 1-800-397-4209.

###

NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.
.,I : 

,I i 

I 

‘1 

OFFICE OF THE A7TORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

I AUSTIN 

Honorable P. W. Hinter 

County Attorney 

Jllu Bogg county 

Bobbronvllle, Texas 

Dear Sir: 

) entitled to qualify 

his reQulred 08th 

opinion OS thlr dew 

In part a4 Pollovs: 

requeclting the 

ted quertion, reada 

. aanuler woe 

oa County, and 

November 24th. to 

& Corgany, and ruoh 

th. 

IdAT oopler, 

to their Local 

of whloh lettere 

Loee herevith cops af my opinion 

to St&con & Saldana, holding that Hr. 0onsale#, 

vho 1s a Private In the Hilitary Servl.04, ir 4ntitled to qualify by flla hlr required oath and 

bond. 

"Please review this file, and give me your 

opinion thereon and quickly 88 polreibleC for you 

can realize the urgenoy of thlr matter. 
‘ j 

HoAurel6 P. if. mnter, glag6 2 

Ya th&ik ou for your opirdon hold- that the pereon named am legal I y qualify as aounty olerk by fillng hit 

oath and bond. Ye ham c6roSully considered your OpiniCiA md 

agree ulth tb4 conclueione etated therein. 

iiererofore thtr dapu%nrsat bar r6aiawS @over&l opln- 

:OiU Oia ~WCtiOn8 Vsl'y QiQiilar t0 the: OA6 &WQented ill JoUr fnauryr In our OpiDion Ro. 0-0873 :t Y&S held *that 00 provirion of tke T4ro6 CoaetLtutlon or ctatutee prwwatr the private 

in the Un%ted Etater Amy irom bea a owulliht6 for eleotton 

to th4 Office Of OOUIIty @QQeQQOF-OOUOCltOT Of t-Q. Ii QUoh 

perron be elected to that &tier, the faot l lorw thM he ir l 

private in the Unitud SUte#‘Am;y will not dleguallfy him to 

t8kr 8nd hold the o$fiOe &n& roQoiVe the WEp6AQ8tiOA ettmhed 

th6reto. See Opblon 810. O-3048, referred to above." 

Ue eaelore heccrrlth oopler of Ul the oplfiioar men-, 

tloned &save md tieo 6OphQ of Opitirvsa IWe. O-5599 &ad O-4465. 

In vteu oi the foregobq &d u rUtad &ova, you 

ere reepeatfully edvleed mt it ie the opinion of thlw de-tm6nt tMt * WrQOA lIh0 UaQ duly l fOc ltOOUAtjr 6d olerk 4nd h4Q 

elm6 b6en lndwt6d Unto th6 Military fhrvlee of tb6 Unlt6d 

Steter u l p r tva te le entitled to Qualify by Siling the coqulred oath uhd bead. 

Verp tml? your9
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 9, 2016

No. 04-16-00327-CV

Maxine ADAMS and Cecil Adams,

Appellants

v.

Christopher PRINE,

Appellee

From the 269th District Court, Harris County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-35653-a

Honorable Dan Hinde, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

In civil cases, rule 34.5(a)(1) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure requires the 

clerk’s record to include “all pleadings on which the trial was held.” TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(a)(1). 

The final judgment signed in the above-referenced case states the trial court considered “Prine’s 

Motion to Enter Final Judgment;” therefore, that motion is one of the “pleadings on which the 

trial was held.” Id. However, the motion was not included in the clerk’s record filed in this 

appeal. It is therefore ORDERED that the trial court clerk file a supplemental clerk’s record 

containing “Prine’s Motion to Enter Final Judgment” no later than ten days from the date of this 

order.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of December, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
### §8506. Notice of sale

At least ninety days before any sale pursuant to this subchapter, written or printed notice thereof describing the property to be sold shall be mailed to the owner of the property or, if deceased, to the owner's executor or administrator, or to the nearest kin, if any such appear by the records of the Department. If none such appears from said records, similar notice shall be posted at the facility where the death occurred or property shall have been found (if in existence) and at the place where such property is situated at the time of such notice, and also at the place where probate notices are posted in the county wherein the sale is to be had. The person posting such notice shall make an affidavit setting forth the time and place of such posting and attaching thereto a copy of such notice, and such affidavit shall be prima facie evidence of such posting and admissible in evidence as proof of the same.

(Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1258, §5206; Pub. L. 99–576, title VII, §701(97), Oct. 28, 1986, 100 Stat. 3300; renumbered §8506, Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §402(b)(1), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 238; Pub. L. 102–83, §4(a)(3), (4), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 404.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–40 renumbered section 5206 of this title as this section.

Pub. L. 102–83 substituted "Department" for "Veterans' Administration".

1986—Pub. L. 99–576 substituted "the owner's" for "his" before "executor".
NRC MONITORING ALERT AT NORTH ANNA

FOLLOWING VIRGINIA EARTHQUAKE

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission headquarters in Rockville, Md., is monitoring 

an Alert at the North Anna nuclear power plant in Virginia, following today’s earthquake in 

central Virginia. The NRC is also monitoring Unusual Events, the lowest emergency 

classification, declared at several other Eastern U.S. nuclear power plants. In accordance with 

agency procedures, the NRC’s regional offices in King of Prussia, Pa., and Atlanta have 

activated their incident response centers. NRC resident inspectors at the affected nuclear power 

plants will continue to monitor conditions for the duration of the event.

North Anna declared its Alert, the second-lowest of the NRC’s four emergency 

classifications, when the plant lost electricity from the grid following the quake just before 2 

p.m. Tuesday. Power is being provided by onsite diesel generators and the plant’s safety systems 

are operating normally. Plant personnel and NRC resident inspectors are continuing to examine 

plant conditions.

NRC staff in the Maryland headquarters felt the quake and immediately began checking 

with U.S. nuclear power plants. The NRC is in direct communications with North Anna and is 

coordinating its response with other federal agencies.

Nuclear power plants are built to withstand environmental hazards, including 

earthquakes. Even those plants that are located outside of areas with extensive seismic activity

are designed for safety in the event of such a natural disaster. The NRC requires that safetysignificant structures, systems, and components be designed to take into account the most severe 

natural phenomena historically reported for the site and surrounding area. 

Plants declaring Unusual Events, which indicate a potential decrease in plant safety,

include Peach Bottom, Three Mile Island, Susquehanna and Limerick in Pennsylvania; Salem,

Hope Creek and Oyster Creek in New Jersey, Calvert Cliffs in Maryland, Surry in Virginia, 

Shearon Harris in North Carolina and D.C. Cook and Palisades in Michigan. All these plants 

continue to operate while plant personnel examine their sites.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-153 August 23, 2011
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: R.A.F., A MINOR

PETITION OF: R.A.F., A MINOR :

:

:

:

: No. 746 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22nd day of March, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
### SUBCHAPTER II—SPECIFIC PILOT PROGRAM

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2002—Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title VIII, §825(b)(3)(B), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2616, and Pub. L. 107–347, title II, §210(h)(3)(C), Dec. 17, 2002, 116 Stat. 2938, amended subchapter heading identically, substituting "PROGRAM" for "PROGRAMS".
### §2108. Specially adapted housing assistive technology grant program

(a) Authority to Make Grants.—The Secretary shall make grants to encourage the development of new assistive technologies for specially adapted housing.

(b) Application.—A person or entity seeking a grant under this section shall submit to the Secretary an application for the grant in such form and manner as the Secretary shall specify.

(c) Grant Funds.—(1) Each grant awarded under this section shall be in an amount of not more than $200,000 per fiscal year.

(2) For each fiscal year in which the Secretary makes a grant under this section, the Secretary shall make the grant by not later than April 1 of that year.

(d) Use of Funds.—The recipient of a grant under this section shall use the grant to develop assistive technologies for use in specially adapted housing.

(e) Report.—Not later than March 1 of each fiscal year following a fiscal year in which the Secretary makes a grant, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report containing information related to each grant awarded under this section during the preceding fiscal year, including—

(1) the name of the grant recipient;

(2) the amount of the grant; and

(3) the goal of the grant.

(f) Funding.—From amounts appropriated to the Department for readjustment benefits for each fiscal year for which the Secretary is authorized to make a grant under this section, $1,000,000 shall be available for that fiscal year for the purposes of the program under this section.

(g) Duration.—The authority to make a grant under this section shall begin on October 1, 2011, and shall terminate on September 30, 2024.

(Added Pub. L. 111–275, title II, §203(a), Oct. 13, 2010, 124 Stat. 2874; amended Pub. L. 114–228, title IV, §409, Sept. 29, 2016, 130 Stat. 940; Pub. L. 115–62, title IV, §408, Sept. 29, 2017, 131 Stat. 1164; Pub. L. 115–251, title I, §122, Sept. 29, 2018, 132 Stat. 3169; Pub. L. 116–159, div. E, title II, §5201, Oct. 1, 2020, 134 Stat. 749; Pub. L. 117–180, div. E, title II, §205, Sept. 30, 2022, 136 Stat. 2138.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 117–180 substituted "September 30, 2024" for "September 30, 2022".

2020—Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 116–159 substituted "September 30, 2022" for "September 30, 2020".

2018—Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 115–251 substituted "September 30, 2020" for "September 30, 2018".

2017—Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 115–62 substituted "September 30, 2018" for "September 30, 2017".

2016—Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 114–228 substituted "September 30, 2017" for "September 30, 2016".
#### § 845.402 Scope.

This subpart applies to agencies and debtors, as defined by § 845.403.
### §7633. Regulations

The Secretary shall prescribe regulations to carry out the Educational Assistance Program.

(Added Pub. L. 100–322, title II, §216(b), May 20, 1988, 102 Stat. 529, §4333; renumbered §7633, Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §402(b)(1), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 238; amended Pub. L. 102–83, §4(b)(1), (2)(E), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 404, 405.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–40 renumbered section 4333 of this title as this section.

Pub. L. 102–83 substituted "Secretary" for "Administrator".
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of
Network Engines, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, John H. Curtis, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|Dated: December 23, 2003 |  |  |  | /s/    JOHN H.
CURTIS
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ---------------------
|                         |  |  |  |
### SUBCHAPTER I—ORGANIZATION AND JURISDICTION
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 222 (Thursday, November 18, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67610-67611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25553]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 04-127]


NASA Advisory Council; Notice of Establishment Pursuant to the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. Sec. Sec.  1 et seq.

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
    Explanation of Need: The Administrator of the National Aeronautics 
and Space Administration has determined that the establishment of a 
NASA Robotic and Human Exploration of Mars Strategic Roadmapping 
Committee is necessary and in the public interest in connection with 
the performance of duties imposed upon NASA by law. This determination 
follows consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat, General 
Services Administration.
    Name of Committee: NASA Robotic and Human Exploration of Mars 
Strategic Roadmapping Committee.
    Purpose and Objective: The Committee will advise NASA Administrator 
on Mars exploration, including robotic exploration of Mars to search 
for evidence of life, to understand the history of the solar system, 
and to prepare for future human exploration. The Committee will draw on 
the expertise of its members and other sources to provide its advice 
and recommendations to the Agency. The Committee will hold meetings and 
make site visits as necessary to accomplish their responsibilities. The 
Committee will function solely as an advisory board and will comply 
fully with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act.
    Lack of Duplication of Resources: The Committee's functions cannot 
be performed by the agency, another existing committee, or other means 
such as a public meeting.
    Fairly Balanced Membership: The Committee will consist of a balance 
of experts from within the government, private industry, and academia. 
In addition, there may be additional experts selected for Subcommittees 
or Task Forces. Members of the Committee, Subcommittee or Task Forces 
will be chosen from among industry, academia, and government with 
recognized knowledge and expertise in specific areas across the NASA's 
portfolio. Total membership will reflect a fairly balanced view.
    Duration: Ad hoc.
    Responsible NASA Official: Dr. Marc Allen, Advanced Planning and 
Integration Office, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 300 
E Street,

[[Page 67611]]

SW., Washington, DC 20546, telephone (202) 358-0733.

P. Diane Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 04-25553 Filed 11-17-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-P