alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §5726. Reports and notice to Congress on data breaches

(a) Quarterly Reports.—(1) Not later than 30 days after the last day of a fiscal quarter, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Veterans' Affairs of the Senate and House of Representatives a report on any data breach with respect to sensitive personal information processed or maintained by the Department that occurred during that quarter.

(2) Each report submitted under paragraph (1) shall identify, for each data breach covered by the report—

(A) the Administration and facility of the Department responsible for processing or maintaining the sensitive personal information involved in the data breach; and

(B) the status of any remedial or corrective action with respect to the data breach.

(b) Notification of Significant Data Breaches.—(1) In the event of a data breach with respect to sensitive personal information processed or maintained by the Secretary that the Secretary determines is significant, the Secretary shall provide notice of such breach to the Committees on Veterans' Affairs of the Senate and House of Representatives.

(2) In the event of a data breach with respect to sensitive personal information processed or maintained by the Secretary that is the sensitive personal information of a member of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps or a civilian officer or employee of the Department of Defense that the Secretary determines is significant under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall provide the notice required under paragraph (1) to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives in addition to the Committees on Veterans' Affairs of the Senate and House of Representatives.

(3) Notice under paragraphs (1) and (2) shall be provided promptly following the discovery of such a data breach and the implementation of any measures necessary to determine the scope of the breach, prevent any further breach or unauthorized disclosures, and reasonably restore the integrity of the data system.

(Added Pub. L. 109–461, title IX, §902(a), Dec. 22, 2006, 120 Stat. 3457.)
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ANTIAN DEANDRE SEWELL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-895

[January 20, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Martin County; Sherwood Bauer, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No. 

432019CF000686A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Gary Lee Caldwell, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah Koenig, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, CIKLIN, and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit
32.1
 
 
 REGENOCELL
THERAPEUTICS, INC.
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE
SARBANNES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the amended
quarterly report of RegenoCELL Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”), I, James F. Mongiardo,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 (1)  The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
                        /s/
                        James F.
      MongiardoJames
      F. MongiardoChief
      Executive OfficerandChief
      Financial OfficerAugust
      27,
2009
#### Marie T. Bata, Respondent, v. Bata a.s., Appellant, and Svit National Corporation, Intervener, Appellant.

Orders unanimously modified so as to allow Bata a.s. to appear in the title as an appellant and to have Bata a.s. listed as an appellant with its attorneys. The disposition of these appeals and of motions, decided herewith *(post,*p. 943) is intended only to facilitate the presentation of an appropriate record and is not to be interpreted as a formal recognition by this court of Bata a.s. as a proper party appellant. Settle order on notice. Present — • Dore, J. P., Callahan, Breitel and Bastow, JJ.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Shilpa B. Trivedi, Relator

Appellate case number: 01-16-00804-CV

Trial court case number: 2014-54049

Trial court: 215th District Court of Harris County

On October 14, 2016, the relator, Shilpa B. Trivedi filed a petition for a writ of 

mandamus seeking to vacate the respondent trial judge’s August 9, 2016 order directing 

that relator’s pleadings be struck if she fails to pay $41,574.38 in attorneys’ fees within 

60 days of that order. With the petition, relator has filed an emergency motion seeking a 

stay of the August 9, 2016 sanctions order and a stay of the emergency hearing set for

October 21, 2016, on several issues related to attorney’s fees and other matters.

Although relator’s emergency motion contains a certificate of service, it fails to 

contain the required certificate of compliance that all parties have been notified by 

expedited means that an emergency motion for temporary relief has been or will be filed. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(a). Accordingly, we DENY relator’s emergency motion 

without prejudice to refiling within 3 days of the date of this order an amended 

emergency motion to stay that contains a certificate of compliance. See id.

In addition, while relator’s appendix contains two cover pages with district clerk 

image numbers for the exhibits, it fails to contain a single index with page numbers for 

all exhibits and the bookmarks fail to link to those exhibits. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(h) 

(“An electronically filed record in an original proceeding . . . that includes more than one 

item must contain bookmarks to assist in locating each item.”). Thus, we ORDER

relator, within 3 days of the date of this order, to file a supplemental record with an 

index with page numbers and bookmarks that link to the exhibits. See id. 9.4(h), 52.7(b).
2

Finally, the Court requests a response to the petition for writ of mandamus by any 

real party in interest. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b)(1). The response, if any, shall be filed 

within 30 days from the date of this order. See id. 2, 52.4.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura Higley

 X Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: October 14, 2016
#### § 782.5 Where to obtain APR report forms.

Report forms required by the APR may be downloaded from the Internet at *http://www.ap.gov.* You also may obtain these forms by contacting: Treaty Compliance Division, Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce, Attn: Forms Request, 14th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Room 4515, Washington, DC 20230, Telephone: (202) 482-1001.
TO : Charlene T. Kukla

Director of Survivor Benefits 0cr 171995

FROM Catherine C. Cook 

General Counsel

SUBJECT : Computation of the ALT PIA and Disability Freeze

This is in response to your memorandum dated July 14, 1995, wherein 

you asked whether the dropout years attributable to a disability 

freeze determination should be included or excluded in computing 

the ALT PIA.

The alternative PIA (Alt PIA) is provided for in section 

202(e)(2)(B)(i) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

S 402(e)(2)(B)(i)). That section provides for a special 

computation of the PIA to be used to compute a widow (er) 's annuity 

when the employee dies before age 62. This provision was effective 

for widow(er)s who become entitled after December 1984. Under your 

current procedure, you secure two ALT PIA's: one considering the

employee's period of disability; the other disregarding the period 

of disability. This procedure was consistent with that of the 

Social Security Administration as reflected in their Program 

Operations Manual (POMS) . According to your memorandum, the Social 

Security Administration has changed its procedures so as to always 

use the period of disability when computing the ALT PIA.

The tier I annuity component of a survivor annuity under the 

Railroad Retirement Act is the amount which would be payable under 

the Social Security Act if all of the railroad employee's earnings 

under the Railroad Retirement Act were creditable under the Social 

Security Act. See section 4(f)(1) of the Railroad Retirement Act 

(45 U.S.C. S 23lc(f)(1)). Therefore, the computation provisions 

used by the Board in computing the tier I annuity component should 

ordinarily conform to those used by the Social Security 

Administration in computing a benefit under the Social Security 

Act. In my opinion, there is no reason not to follow this general 

rule in this instance. Therefore, effective with widow(er) claims 

utilizing the ALT PIA awarded after the date of this decision, the 

computation of the ALT PIA should conform to the procedure used by 

the Social Security Administration.
#### § 18.10 Delegations of authority.

The Secretary delegates to the General Counsel the authority to take final action on matters pertaining to the Act.
# L_2022291EN.01002801.xml

| 10.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 291/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 291/28

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 151/2019

of 14 June 2019

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2022/2143]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/729 of 26 February 2018 amending Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 as regards the inclusion of certain drug precursors in the list of scheduled substances (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/729 of 26 February 2018 amending Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 as regards the inclusion of certain drug precursors in the list of scheduled substances (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 15x (Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XIII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘- | 32018 R 0729: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/729 of 26 February 2018 (OJ L 123, 18.5.2018, p. 4).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘-

32018 R 0729: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/729 of 26 February 2018 (OJ L 123, 18.5.2018, p. 4).’

Article 2

The text of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/729 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 15 June 2019, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 14 June 2019.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 123, 18.5.2018, p. 4.

1

(*)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*

---
### §40733. Applicability of other law

(a) In General.—Except as provided in subsection (b), section 922(a)(1)–(3) and (5) of title 18 does not apply to the shipment, transportation, receipt, transfer, sale, issuance, loan, or delivery by the corporation, of an item that the corporation is authorized to issue, loan, sell, or receive under this chapter.

(b) Exception.—With respect to firearms other than caliber .22 rimfire and caliber .30 rifles, the corporation shall obtain a license as a dealer in firearms and abide by all requirements imposed on persons licensed under chapter 44 of title 18, including maintaining acquisition and disposition records, and conducting background checks.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1341; Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title X, §1087(a)(2)(D), Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 1013.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 40733 | 36:5504(e)(2). | Feb. 10, 1996, Pub. L. 104–106, title XVI, §1614(e)(2), 110 Stat. 518. |

Section

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2015—Pub. L. 114–92 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, substituted "Except as provided in subsection (b), section" for "Section", and added subsec. (b).
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Ikanos Communications, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Rajesh Vashist, ChiefExecutive Officer, and Daniel K. Alter, Chief Financial Officer, of theCompany, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company

     Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
|                 | **IKANOS COMMUNICAITONS,  INC.**                          |   |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| ** **      | ** **                                                |   |
| August 16, 2006 | /s/   RAJESH  VASHIST                      |   |
|            | Rajesh Vashist                                            |   |
| * *        | *President, Executive Officer  and Chairman of the Board* |   |
| * *        | *(Principal Executive Officer)*                           |   |
| * *        | * *                                                  |   |
| August 16, 2006 | /s/   DANIEL  K. ATLER                     |   |
|            | Daniel K. Alter                                           |   |
| * *        | *Vice President and Chief  Financial Officer*             |   |
| * *        | *(Principal Financial and  Accounting Officer)*           |   |

 

----
231.120 Technology licensing. *Technology licensing* means: ( a ) An express or implied contractual agreement in which the rights owned by, licensed to or otherwise lawfully available to one party in any trade secrets or knowhow are sold, licensed or otherwise made available to another party.
( b ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, the following is not technology licensing: ( 1 ) Licensing of patents, including licenses related to standard essential patents or cross licensing activities;
( 2 ) Licensing or transfer agreements conducted exclusively between a covered entity and related entities, or between or among related entities of the covered entity;
( 3 ) A standards-related activity (as such term is defined in 15 CFR part 772);
( 4 ) Agreements that grant patent rights only with respect to “published information” and no proprietary information is shared;
( 5 ) An implied or general intellectual property license relating to the use of a product that is sold by a covered entity or related entities;
( 6 ) Technology licensing related to a manufacturing process for an existing product solely to enable use of assembly, test, or packaging services for integrated circuits;
( 7 ) Technology licensing involving two or more entities to establish or apply a drawing, design, or related specification for a product to be purchased and sold between or among such entities;
( 8 ) Warranty, service, and customer support performed by a covered entity or an entity that is a related entity of a covered entity; and
( 9 ) Disclosures of technical information to a customer solely for the design of integrated circuits to be manufactured by the funding recipient for that customer.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Victoria Industries, Inc. a Nevada
corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), Oleg Batratchenko, Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
              The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
 
 (2)
              The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and result of operations of the
Company.








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Victoria Industries, Inc., and will be retained by Victoria Industries, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.





Date:
      March 26, 2010By:
            /s/
      Oleg BatratchenkoOleg
      BatratchenkoChief
      Executive Officer
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region III

2443 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. III-11-016

Contact: Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil (630) 829-9663

May 3, 2011

E-Mail: OPA3.RegionIII@nrc.gov 

NRC CONTINUES TO MONITOR EVENT AT DUANE ARNOLD NUCLEAR POWER 

PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission continues to monitor a fire at the Duane 

Arnold nuclear power plant that is being fuelled by hydrogen from the tank of a delivery truck. 

Hydrogen is used in plant operations to cool the main turbine generator.

The NRC activated its Emergency Response Center at the Region 3 office in Lisle, Ill., to 

monitor an Alert that was declared at the Duane Arnold nuclear power plant at 2:08 p.m. CDT. 

The plant is located about eight miles northwest from Cedar Rapids, Iowa. 

The plant operator, NextEra Energy Duane Arnold, declared an alert due to a truck 

catching fire as it was making a delivery to the plant. The fire is in the vicinity of the utility’s 

pump house which houses plant equipment but is outside the plant protected area. No plant 

safety related equipment has been affected by the fire and the plant continues to operate at 100 

percent power. There is no impact to public health.

The utility has reported that the truck driver was transported to a local hospital with 

minor injuries. Local fire departments have responded to the site. 

An alert is the second lowest of four emergency levels for a nuclear power plant and 

represents degradation in plant safety. 

Two NRC resident inspectors at the plant and staff in the Region 3 office are responding 

to the event and will continue to monitor the situation until it is resolved. The agency’s primary 

concern is to make sure the public is protected and that the plant operator is taking appropriate 

actions to address the issue. 

The NRC will evaluate the circumstances around the event once the situation is resolved.

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.
§ 700.11 Priority ratings. ( a ) *Levels of priority.* ( 1 ) There are two levels of priority established by this regulation, identified by the rating symbols “DO” and “DX.”
( 2 ) All DO rated orders have equal priority with each other and take preference over unrated orders. All DX rated orders have equal priority with each other and take preference over DO rated orders and unrated orders. (For resolution of conflicts among rated orders of equal priority, see § 700.14(c).)
( 3 ) In addition, a Directive issued by Commerce takes preference over any DX rated order, DO rated order, or unrated order, as stipulated in the Directive. (For a full discussion of Directives, see § 700.62.)
( b ) *Program identification symbols.* Program identification symbols indicate which approved program is being supported by a rated order. The list of approved programs and their identification symbols is found in schedule I to this part. For example, A1 identifies defense aircraft programs and A7 signifies defense electronic and communications equipment programs. Program identification symbols, in themselves, do not connote any priority.
( c ) *Priority ratings.* A priority rating consists of the rating symbol—DO and DX—and the program identification symbol, such as A1, A7, or N1. Thus, a contract for the production of an aircraft will contain a DO-A1 or DX-A1 priority rating. A contract for a radar set will contain a DO-A7 or DX-A7 priority rating.
[49 FR 30414, July 30, 1984. Redesignated at 54 FR 601, Jan. 9, 1989, as amended at 63 FR 31922, June 11, 1998; 71 FR 39528, July 13, 2006; 79 FR 47565, Aug. 14, 2014; 89 FR 58971, July 22, 2024]