alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Central Kansas Railway, Inc.

Central Kansas Railway, L.L.C.

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board

concerning the status of Central Kansas Railway Inc., (CKR) and

Central Kansas Railway, L.L.C. (CKRLLC) as employers under the

Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. §231 et seq. ) (RRA) and the

Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. §351 et sea.)

(RUIA) . CKR (BA No. 2765) has been found to be a rail carrier

employer under the Acts effective January 2, 1993 . See Board

Coverage Decision 93-26.

According to a letter dated May 11, 1994, from Mr. Mike Ogborn,

Manager of CKRLLC, CKR underwent a corporate reorganization which

resulted in CKR, a corporation, becoming CKRLLC, a limited 

liability company. In his letter, Mr. Ogborn stated that CKRLLC 

has assumed all Railroad Retirement Board obligations of CKR under

the Acts and all employees of CKRLLC remain covered employees.

There was no break in operations between the time the railroad was

operated as a corporation and the time it has been operated as a

limited liability company. The Interstate Commerce Commission

(ICC) granted CKRLLC exemption to operate as a limited liability

company effective December 28, 1993. ICC Finance No. 32430,

service date January 21, 1994. CKRLLC is a common carrier

operating in the states of Kansas and Oklahoma, and transports a

variety of freight. CKRLLC operates fifteen GP-7 locomotives owned

by it and leases a number of rail cars from other entities.

Based upon the information summarized above, it is determined that

there has merely been a corporate reorganization and name change.

Accordingly, Central Kansas Railway, L.L.C. continues to be a rail

carrier employer under the Acts, replacing Central Kansas Railway,

Inc., and may continue to use BA ^o. 2765.

Glen L. Bower

Jerome F. Kever

BCD 1995-27 BA # 2765
#### § 325.7 Amending the certificate.

An application for an amendment to a certificate shall be treated in the same manner as an original application. The application for an amendment shall set forth the proposed amendment(s) and the reasons for them. It shall contain any information specified in § 325.3(b) that is relevant to the determination on the application for an amendment. The effective date of an amendment will be the date on which the application for the amendment was deemed submitted.
NRC’S KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM RECEIVES 2010 MERIT AWARD 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has been selected to receive the Adobe and 

MeriTalk Honor Merit Award for its Knowledge Management (KM) program. This award 

acknowledges innovative implementations that work toward efficient and effective government 

communication. 

The Merit Awards program recognizes excellence in initiatives that aim to encourage 

collaboration and transparency in government. This year’s, award recognized the NRC for its 

efforts to break down organizational silos and effectively communicate within its own walls by 

innovative means. 

The NRC’s KM program responds to the need to capture critical information and 

expertise from its experienced workers before they leave the agency. Through tools such as 

training, interviews, databases, and written procedures, the KM program provides agency-wide 

knowledge resources. As a part of this process, the NRC also maintains a knowledge center 

where employees can share information among themselves via blogs, video sharing, document 

collaboration, and professional networking. 

Patricia Eng, Senior Advisor for Knowledge Management, accepted the award on behalf 

of the NRC at the 2nd Annual Adobe Government Assembly ceremony on November 3. The 

NRC’s KM Program will be featured on the Government Assembly and MeriTalk websites at 

http://www.adobegovernmentassembly.com and http://www.meritalk.com, respectively. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-201 November 3, 2010
#### § 10.2 Funding.

Groups who represent producers, distributors, consumers or users, or others that wish to act or continue to act as proponent organizations for the development or maintenance of a Voluntary Product Standard will be required to pay for administrative and technical support services provided by the National Institute of Standards & Technology and such other direct or indirect costs associated with the development or maintenance of that standard as may be deemed appropriate by the Department, including costs to the Department in connection with the operation of the Standard Review Committee and the Standing Committee. Funds may also be provided by a government agency at the request of a proponent organization or when acting on its own behalf for the development or maintenance of a Voluntary Product Standard. Proponents of standards that meet sponsorship criteria established in these procedures shall furnish an initial deposit of funds sufficient to cover the first year's services and other costs. Estimated annual costs will be based on an hourly rate for salary and overhead established by the Department for the National Institute of Standards & Technology's administrative and technical support services plus estimates of direct costs to provide funds for such items as the travel of consumer representatives unable to otherwise attend committee meetings, travel for Department staff, and printing costs. Project funds will be reviewed annually. Excess funds may be refunded or applied to the next accounting period. Should funds from deposits be inadequate during an accounting period, work on the project will continue only if funds are restored to a level estimated adequate to complete the 12-month period.

[51 FR 22497, June 20, 1986, as amended at 55 FR 38315, Sept. 18, 1990]
### §7472. Supervision and staffing of Centers

(a) Centers shall be operated under the supervision of the Under Secretary for Health and shall be staffed with personnel qualified to provide the highest quality instruction and training in various medical and health care disciplines.

(b) As a means of providing appropriate recognition to persons in the career service of the Administration who possess outstanding qualifications in a particular medical or health care discipline, the Under Secretary for Health shall from time to time and for such period as the Under Secretary for Health considers appropriate assign such persons to serve as visiting instructors at Centers.

(c) Whenever the Under Secretary for Health considers it necessary for the effective conduct of the program provided for under this subchapter, the Under Secretary for Health may contract for the services of highly qualified medical and health personnel from outside the Department to serve as instructors at such Centers.

(Added Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §401(b)(5), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 237; amended Pub. L. 102–405, title III, §302(c)(1), Oct. 9, 1992, 106 Stat. 1984.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 4122 of this title prior to the repeal of that section as part of the complete revision of chapter 73 of this title by Pub. L. 102–40.

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–405 substituted "Under Secretary for Health" for "Chief Medical Director" wherever appearing.
Exhibit 31.1
 Chief Executive Officer Certification****
 
 
 I, John M. Monter, certify that:
 
 1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Brand Intermediate Holdings, Inc; 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 
 3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 
 4.
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 
 (a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 
 (b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report on such evaluation; and 
 (c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting. 
 5.
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 
 (a)
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 
 (b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting; 
 
 Date: November 15, 2004
/s/ John M. MonterJohn M. MonterChief Executive Officer, President
### §6112. Supreme Court Building and grounds employees

Employees required to carry out section 6111(a) of this title shall be—

(1) appointed by the Architect of the Capitol with the approval of the Chief Justice of the United States;

(2) compensated in accordance with chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of title 5; and

(3) subject to subchapter III of chapter 83 of title 5.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1181.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6112 | 40:13b. | May 7, 1934, ch. 222, §2, 48 Stat. 668; Pub. L. 95–431, title IV, ("Sec. 1(b) (proviso)" in proviso in par. under heading "Care of the Building and Grounds"), Oct. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 1036. |

Section

In this section, before clause (1), the words "to carry out" are substituted for "for the performance of the provisions of" to eliminate unnecessary words. In clause (2), the words "chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of title 5" are substituted for "the Classification Act of 1949, as amended" because of section 7(b) of the Act of September 6, 1966 (Public Law 89–554, 80 Stat. 631), the first section of which enacted Title 5, United States Code. In clause (3), the words "subchapter III of chapter 83 of title 5" are substituted for "the Act entitled 'An Act for the retirement of employees in the classified civil service, and for other purposes' approved May 22, 1920, as amended (U.S.C., title 5, ch. 14)" because of section 7(b) of the Act of September 6, 1966 (Public Law 89–554, 80 Stat. 631), the first section of which enacted Title 5, United States Code.
**Exhibit31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Richard Thon, certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30,2006 of ProUroCare Medical Inc.;

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer asof, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The smallbusiness issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer andhave:

a)              Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small businessissuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;

b)             Evaluated the effectiveness of the small businessissuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and

c)              Disclosed in this report any change in the smallbusiness issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the smallbusiness issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     The smallbusiness issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to thesmall business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small businessissuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)              All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)             Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: September 18, 2006 |    /s/ Richard Thon |
|--------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                     | Name: Richard Thon                 |
|                     | Title: Chief Financial Officer     |

 

----
### [§322. Repealed. Pub. L. 109–313, §3(h)(1), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1736]

Section, Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1076, related to an Information Technology Fund in the Treasury.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective 60 days after Oct. 6, 2006, see section 6 of Pub. L. 109–313, set out as an Effective Date of 2006 Amendment note under section 5316 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
```
Sex Discrimination: DEA's Handling of Sexual Harassment and Other
Complaints (Letter Report, 03/04/94, GAO/OSI-94-10).

Employees at the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) are reluctant to
use the agency's complaint process to deal with sexual harassment
because they fear reprisal from managers and because they believe that
investigators lack objectivity, sensitivity, and confidence. GAO found
that Office of Professional Responsibility investigators sometimes did
not obtain all corroborating evidence when looking into complaints and
that differences in the rights and remedies afforded by equal employment
opportunity and Office of Professional Responsibility investigations
were not communicated to the employees. Finally, although training on
the agency's sexual-harassment-complaints process was made available to
all employees, many persons said that they had received no specialized
training. GAO believes that DEA will continue to have problems with
sexual harassment unless it changes the way in which it handles sexual
harassment allegations. GAO summarized this report in testimony before
Congress; see: Sex Discrimination: Agencies' Handling of Sexual
Harassment and Related Complaints, by Richard C. Stiener, Director of
the Office of Special Investigations, before the Subcommittee on
Oversight and Investigations, House Committee on Post Office and Civil
Service. GAO/T-OSI-94-22, Mar. 8, 1994 (seven pages).

--------------------------- Indexing Terms -----------------------------

 REPORTNUM:  OSI-94-10
     TITLE:  Sex Discrimination: DEA's Handling of Sexual Harassment and 
             Other Complaints
      DATE:  03/04/94
   SUBJECT:  Sex discrimination
             Sexual harassment
             Fair employment programs
             Law enforcement agencies
             Women
             Employment discrimination
             Employee promotions
             Investigations by federal agencies
             Administrative remedies
             Civil rights law enforcement

             
************************************************************************

We regret that the full text of this item is presently unavailable.

See the GAO FAQ - Section 2.0 for printed copy ordering information.
The FAQ is automatically retrieved with all WAIS search results or 
can be obtained by sending e-mail to: [email protected]
```
### §1783. Bereavement counseling

(a) Deaths of Veterans.—In the case of an individual who was a recipient of services under section 1782 of this title at the time of the death of the veteran, the Secretary may provide bereavement counseling to that individual in the case of a death—

(1) that was unexpected; or

(2) that occurred while the veteran was participating in a hospice program (or a similar program) conducted by the Secretary.

(b) Deaths In Active Service.—(1) The Secretary may provide bereavement counseling to an individual who is a member of the immediate family of a member of the Armed Forces who dies in the active military, naval, air, or space service in the line of duty and under circumstances not due to the person's own misconduct.

(2) For purposes of this subsection, the members of the immediate family of a member of the Armed Forces described in paragraph (1) include the parents of such member.

(c) Provision of Counseling Through Vet Centers.—Bereavement counseling may be provided under this section through the facilities and personnel of centers for the provision of readjustment counseling and related mental health services under section 1712A of this title.

(d) Bereavement Counseling Defined.—For purposes of this section, the term "bereavement counseling" means such counseling services, for a limited period, as the Secretary determines to be reasonable and necessary to assist an individual with the emotional and psychological stress accompanying the death of another individual.

(Added Pub. L. 107–135, title II, §208(b), Jan. 23, 2002, 115 Stat. 2463; amended Pub. L. 109–461, title II, §216, Dec. 22, 2006, 120 Stat. 3424; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, §926(a)(31), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3830.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1783 was renumbered section 3683 of this title.

#### Amendments

2021—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 116–283 substituted "air, or space service" for "or air service".

2006—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 109–461, §216(a), designated existing provisions as par. (1) and added par. (2).

Subsecs. (c), (d). Pub. L. 109–461, §216(b), added subsec. (c) and redesignated former subsec. (c) as (d).
#### In the Matter of Jacob Bernoff, Respondent, against Edward J. Donovan, as Commissioner of Correction of the State of New York, Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed and the petition dismissed. The record shows that the relator [petitioner] received a prison sentence and not a suspended sentence on counts 1 and 10 of the indictment. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Breitel and Bergan, JJ.
### §903. Uniform allowance

(a) The Secretary may pay an allowance under this section for the purchase of uniforms to any Department police officer who is required to wear a prescribed uniform in the performance of official duties.

(b)(1) The amount of the allowance that the Secretary may pay under this section is the lesser of—

(A) the amount currently allowed as prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management; or

(B) estimated costs or actual costs as determined by periodic surveys conducted by the Department.

(2) During any fiscal year no officer shall receive more for the purchase of a uniform described in subsection (a) than the amount established under this subsection.

(c) The allowance established under subsection (b) shall be paid at the beginning of a Department police officer's employment for those appointed on or after October 1, 2010. In the case of any other Department police officer, an allowance in the amount established under subsection (b) shall be paid upon the request of the officer.

(d) A police officer who resigns as a police officer less than one year after receiving an allowance in an amount established under this section shall repay to the Department a pro rata share of the amount paid, based on the number of months the officer was actually employed as such an officer during the twelve-month period following the date on which such officer began such employment or the date on which the officer submitted a request for such an allowance, as the case may be.

(e) An allowance may not be paid to a Department police officer under this section and under section 5901 of title 5 for the same fiscal year.

(Added Pub. L. 102–83, §2(a), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 398; amended Pub. L. 111–163, title X, §1002, May 5, 2010, 124 Stat. 1182.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Prior section 903 was renumbered section 2303 of this title.

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 218(c) of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 102–83, §2(a).

#### Amendments

2010—Subsecs. (b), (c). Pub. L. 111–163 added subsecs. (b) and (c) and struck out former subsecs. (b) and (c) which read as follows:

"(b) The amount of the allowance that the Secretary may pay under this section—

"(1) may be based on estimated average costs or actual costs;

"(2) may vary by geographic regions; and

"(3) except as provided in subsection (c), may not exceed $200 in a fiscal year for any police officer.

"(c) The amount of an allowance under this section may be increased to an amount up to $400 for not more than one fiscal year in the case of any Department police officer. In the case of a person who is appointed as a Department police officer on or after January 1, 1990, an allowance in an amount established under this subsection shall be paid at the beginning of such person's employment as such an officer. In the case of any other Department police officer, an allowance in an amount established under this subsection shall be paid upon the request of the officer."