alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 842.608 Changes of election before final adjudication.

An employee or Member may name a new survivor or change his or her election of type of annuity if, not later than 30 days after the date of the first regular monthly payment, the named survivor dies or the employee or Member files with OPM a new written election. All required evidence of spousal consent or justification for waiver of spousal consent, if applicable, must accompany any new written election under this section.

[56 FR 65419, Dec. 17, 1991]
Exhibit 32.1

          CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Quarterly Report of East Penn Financial
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Brent L.
Peters, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      o     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      o     To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
            presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial
            condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates
            and for the periods presented in the Report.


------------------------------------------------------
Brent L. Peters, President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: May 11, 2004


                                    Page 25
EXHIBIT 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature
appears below constitutes and appoints J. Philip Hester, Sr., his
Attorney-in-Fact, with full power of substitution, for him and in his name,
place and stead, and in any and all capacities, to sign this Form 10-KSB and any
amendment thereto, and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and such other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
and hereby ratifies and confirms all that said Attorney-in-Fact, or his
substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

         In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below
by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and
on the dates indicated.


/s/ J. Philip Hester, Sr.
-------------------------                     ----------------------
J. Philip Hester, Sr.                         Andrew M. Head
Chief Executive Officer, President and        Director
Director (principal executive officer)        March 30, 2005
March 30, 2005

                                              /s/ Bruce T. Howard
-------------------                           ----------------------
Ralph Millard Bowen                           Bruce T. Howard
Director                                      Director
March 30, 2005                                March 30, 2005


/s/ Marcus C. Byrd, Jr.                      /s/ David E, Johnson
-----------------------                      --------------------
Marcus C. Byrd, Jr.                          David E. Johnson
Director                                     Chairman of the Board of Directors
March 30, 2005                               March 30, 2005


/s/ Glennon C. Grogan                        /s/ Deborah F. McLeod
---------------------                        ---------------------
Glennon C. Grogan                            Deborah F. McLeod
Director                                     Chief Financial Officer (principal
March 30, 2005                               accounting officer)
                                             March 30, 2005


/s/ James H. Grogan                          /s/ William A. McRae
-------------------                          ----------------------
James H. Grogan                              William A. McRae
Secretary and Director                       Director
March 30, 2005                               March 30, 2005


/s/ Kim M. Mills                             /s/ Russell M. Wallace
----------------                             ----------------------
Kim M. Mills                                 Russell M. Wallace
Director                                     Director
March 30, 2005                               March 30, 2005
#### Eghia E. Davitian, Appellant, v. Peerless Photo-Engraving Co., Inc., Respondent.

The union rate of compensation, as that term is used in the employment contract, contemplates and includes that for straight time and for overtime and any other compensation payable under the pertinent union contract. It is sufficiently alleged, either expressly or by clear implication, that the weekly salaries are not in excess of the compensation payable on the basis of the union rate for straight time and for overtime and, in fact, are insufficient by the amount of overtime for which recovery is sought. So, too, with respect to the claim for compensation for vacation, it is clearly implied that the salaries paid are *586insufficient, after computation of compensation otherwise due under the union contract, insofar as concerns the amount for vacation, for which recovery is sought. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Mac Crate, JJ., concur.
### SUBCHAPTER VI—GENERAL

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–435, title II, §204(a)(2), Dec. 20, 2006, 120 Stat. 3210, redesignated subchapter V of this chapter as this subchapter.
### §455. Effect of failure to issue regulations

In any proceeding under section 453(1), if the President, or the designee of the President, has not issued a regulation on a matter for which this chapter requires a regulation to be issued, the administrative agency shall apply, to the extent necessary and appropriate, the most relevant substantive executive agency regulation promulgated to implement the statutory provision at issue in the proceeding.

(Added Pub. L. 104–331, §2(a), Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4068.)
#### In the Matter of Gerald J. O’Reilly, Petitioner, against Board of Regents of the University of the State of New York, Respondent.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, without costs. Stay of proceedings continued for ten days and if application for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals is made within that time, the stay is continued until that application is decided by the Court of Appeals. Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Imrie, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 813.]
NRC ISSUES FINAL SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT FOR PROPOSED 

MIXED-OXIDE FUEL FABRICATION FACILITY AT SAVANNAH RIVER 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has published its final Safety Evaluation Report 

(SER) for the license application by Shaw AREVA MOX Services, LLC, to possess and use 

radioactive material at the Mixed-Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility at the Department of Energy’s 

Savannah River Site near Aiken, S.C. 

 The report, which has been redacted to remove security related and proprietary 

information, documents the NRC staff’s technical safety review of MOX Services’ operating 

license application for the facility. It does not represent a decision to issue the license. A license 

will be issued only if the NRC verifies the applicant has properly constructed principal 

structures, systems and components. That stage is expected to be several years away. 

 The report contains the staff’s conclusion that the applicant’s descriptions, specifications, 

commitments and analyses provide an adequate basis for safety and safeguards of facility 

operations and that operation of the facility would not pose an undue risk to worker and public 

health and safety. 

The SER was reviewed by the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards and approved 

for publication in September 2010. 

 The NRC issued a Construction Authorization for the facility in March 2005, and 

construction is under way. The facility is part of an agreement between the United States and the 

Russian Federation to dismantle thousands of Cold War-era nuclear weapons by using the 

plutonium from warheads to manufacture fuel for civilian nuclear power reactors. The facility 

would combine plutonium and uranium oxides to make the mixed-oxide, or MOX, fuel. It is the 

only MOX fuel fabrication facility being built in the United States. 

 The SER reviews the applicants financial qualifications, plans for protection of classified 

matter, organization and administration, integrated safety analysis, nuclear criticality safety, fire 

protection, chemical safety, radiation safety, environmental protection and plant systems. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-225 December 27, 2010
The redacted SER for the MOX facility will be published as a NUREG document, and 

can presently be found in the NRC’s online ADAMS database at http://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/adams/web-based.html by searching for accession number ML103430615. More information 

about the MOX review is available at http://www.nrc.gov/materials/fuel-cyclefac/mox/licensing.html. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 21 (Thursday, January 31, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 771-772]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00337]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as

[[Page 772]]

amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Biological Chemistry and Macromolecular 
Biophysics Integrated Review Group; Synthetic and Biological 
Chemistry B Study Section.
    Date: February 12-13, 2019.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hilton Garden Inn Bethesda, 7301 Waverly Street, 
Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Michael Eissenstat, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, BCMB IRG, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes 
of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4166, MSC 7806, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-435-1722, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b5d0dcc6c6d0dbc6c1d4c1d8d4f5d6c6c79bdbdcdd9bd2dac3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4124283232242f323520352c20012232336f2f28296f262e37">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in 
advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of 
December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 25, 2019.
Sylvia L. Neal,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-00337 Filed 1-30-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title:****Biennial report to Congress on thestatus of GPO Access
 
1994
PDF | txt
1995
PDF | txt
1997
PDF | txt
1999
PDF | txt
2001
PDF | txt
 
 
SuDoc Number:GP 1.1/2:
Item Number: 0556-C
CGP System Number:000570296
 
 
October 20, 2017
 
 **
NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON MEDICAL USES OF ISOTOPES

TELECONFERENCE MEETING OCT. 18

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Medical Uses of

Isotopes (ACMUI) will convene a teleconference meeting on Oct. 18 to discuss the ACMUI 

Permanent Implant Brachytherapy Subcommittee Report.

The ACMUI advises the NRC on policy and technical issues related to the regulation of 

medical uses of certain radioactive materials.

The teleconference meeting will be held on Tuesday, October 18, from 12 p.m. to 2 p.m. 

(E.D.T.) An ACMUI detailed agenda is available on the NRC website.

Questions from the public will be permitted at the discretion of the committee chairperson. 

Any member of the public wanting to provide a written statement, or otherwise participate in the 

meeting in person or via phone, or requiring special services, should contact Ashley Cockerham by 

e-mail at ashley.cockerham@nrc.gov or telephone at 240- 888-7129. 

All submittals must be received by Oct. 14, and must pertain to a topic on the meeting 

agenda. Any member of the public who wishes to participate in the meeting in person or via phone 

should contact Ashley Cockerham using the information above

The meeting summary will be available at the end of November on the ACMUI Web page. 

The draft transcript will be available on or about Nov. 18 on the ACMUI Web page and in the NRC 

Public Document Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md. 20852-2738, phone 800-397-4209.

###

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should contact 

the Office of Public Affairs beforehand.

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES link 

on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to 

NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-187 October 3, 2011
### §10307. Definitions

For purposes of this part:

(1) The term "Attorney General" means the Attorney General of the United States.

(2) The term "program of education" means any curriculum or any combination of unit courses or subjects pursued at an eligible educational institution, which generally is accepted as necessary to fulfill requirements for the attainment of a predetermined and identified educational, professional, or vocational objective. It includes course work for the attainment of more than one objective if in addition to the previous requirements, all the objectives generally are recognized as reasonably related to a single career field.

(3) The term "eligible educational institution" means an institution which—

(A) is an institution of higher education, as defined in section 102 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1002); and

(B) is eligible to participate in programs under title IV of such Act [20 U.S.C. 1070 et seq.].

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §1217, as added Pub. L. 104–238, §2(2), Oct. 3, 1996, 110 Stat. 3116; amended Pub. L. 105–390, §2(6), Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3496; Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title X, §1086(b)(1)(K), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1968.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Higher Education Act of 1965, referred to in par. (3)(B), is Pub. L. 89–329, Nov. 8, 1965, 79 Stat. 1219. Title IV of the Act is classified generally to subchapter IV (§1070 et seq.) of chapter 28 of Title 20, Education. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1001 of Title 20 and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3796d–6 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

2013—Par. (3)(A). Pub. L. 112–239 substituted "an institution of higher education, as defined in section 102 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1002); and" for "described in section 481 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1088), as in effect on October 3, 1996; and".

1998—Pars. (2) to (4). Pub. L. 105–390 redesignated pars. (3) and (4) as (2) and (3), respectively, and struck out former par. (2) which read as follows: "The term 'Federal law enforcement officer' has the same meaning as under part A of this subchapter."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2013 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 112–239 effective Jan. 2, 2013, and applicable to matters pending on Jan. 2, 2013, or filed or accruing after that date, with certain exceptions, see section 1086(d) of Pub. L. 112–239, set out as a note under section 10251 of this title.
### NUMBER 13

- 2 2

- 000 5 67

- C V

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

JOSE ISABEL PEREZ

, Appellant,

v.

TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION

, Appellee.

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 8

of Hidalgo County, Texas.



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria

This matter is before the court on its own motion. On February 2, 2023, the Clerk

of the Court notified appellant that, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure

38.8(a)(1), the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution unless, within ten2 days, appellant provided reasonable explanation for his failure to timely file a brief.

Appellant failed to respond to the notice and has not filed a brief.

Appellant neither reasonably explained his failure to file a motion for extension of

time nor file d his brief. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.8(a), 42.3(b),(c).

NORA L. LONGORIA

Justice

Delivered and filed on the

1st day of June, 2023.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED SE PTEMBER 10, 2019

NO. 03

- 19

- 00549

- CR

Cody James Kelley, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM T HE 331ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND SMITH
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction r en d ered by the tr i a l court. Having reviewed

the record , it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal . Therefore, the Court

dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction

. Because appellant is indigent and u nable to pay

costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2301

To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to provide for the installation 

of chemical and biological detection devices in the enclosed passenger 

boarding stations of each heavy rail transit system in the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 3, 2003

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to provide 

for the installation of chemical and biological detection 

devices in the enclosed passenger boarding stations of 

each heavy rail transit system in the United States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Commuter Safety Act 

5 of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds the following: 
2

•HR 2301 IH 

1 (1) Subway systems in the United States are 

2 not adequately protected from the possibility of 

3 chemical or biological attacks. 

4 (2) Millions of United States citizens use these 

5 subway systems every day to commute to work or 

6 otherwise navigate throughout the Nation’s cities. 

7 (3) The United States Government is respon8 sible for ensuring that its citizens are protected from 

9 the threat of terrorism. 

10 SEC. 3. INSTALLATION OF CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DE11 TECTION DEVICES IN SUBWAY STATIONS. 

12 (a) ESTABLISHMENT OF PROGRAM.—The Secretary 

13 of Homeland Security shall establish a program to provide 

14 for the installation of chemical and biological detection de15 vices in the enclosed passenger boarding stations of each 

16 heavy rail transit system in the United States, including 

17 each station constructed after the date of enactment of 

18 this Act. 

19 (b) GRANTS.—In carrying out the program, the Sec20 retary may make grants to owners and operators of heavy 

21 rail transit systems for the installation of chemical and 

22 biological detection devices under the program. 

23 (c) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of the cost 

24 of activities carried out under the program shall be 70 

25 percent. 
3

•HR 2301 IH 

1 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the following defi2 nitions apply: 

3 (1) ENCLOSED PASSENGER BOARDING STA4 TION.—The term ‘‘enclosed passenger boarding sta5 tion’’ means any passenger boarding station that is 

6 located underground or above ground in an enclosed 

7 facility. 

8 (2) HEAVY RAIL TRANSIT SYSTEM.—The term 

9 ‘‘heavy rail transit system’’ means a transit system 

10 that operates high-speed, passenger rail cars singly 

11 or in trains of 2 or more cars on fixed rails in sepa12 rate rights-of-way from which all other vehicular and 

13 foot traffic are excluded. 

14 (e) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

15 are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 

16 necessary to carry out this section.

Æ
### §1301. Charge of property transferred to the Federal Government

(a) In General.—Except as provided in subsection (b), the Administrator of General Services shall have charge of—

(1) all land and other property which has been or may be assigned, set off, or conveyed to the Federal Government in payment of debts;

(2) all trusts created for the use of the Government in payment of debts due the Government; and

(3) the sale and disposal of land—

(A) assigned or set off to the Government in payment of debt; or

(B) vested in the Government by mortgage or other security for the payment of debts.

(b) Nonapplication.—This section does not apply to—

(1) real estate which has been or shall be assigned, set off, or conveyed to the Government in payment of debts arising under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 1 et seq.); or

(2) trusts created for the use of the Government in payment of debts arising under the Code and due the Government.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1131.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1301 | 40:301. | R.S. §3750; Pub. L. 89–30, §2, June 2, 1965, 79 Stat. 119. |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "Except as provided in subsection (b)" are added for clarity.

In subsection (b)(1), the words "the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 1 et seq.)" are substituted for "the internal-revenue laws" for clarity and for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Internal Revenue Code of 1986, referred to in subsec. (b)(1), is classified to Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.