alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 10645]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects to be included in the exhibition “Egypt: The Time of Pharaohs,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Cincinnati Museum Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, from on or about February 14, 2019, until on or about August 18, 2019, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Elliot Chiu, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State,L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-22 of December 21, 2018.                

Susan Crystal,

Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2018-28466 Filed 1-2-19; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
### §220110. Principal office

The principal office of the corporation shall be in New York, New York, or another place decided by the board of governors. However, the activities of the corporation are not confined to the place where the principal office is located but may be conducted throughout the States, territories, and possessions of the United States and in foreign countries.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1461.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 220110 | 36:1309(a). | Dec. 29, 1979, Pub. L. 96–165, §9(a), 93 Stat. 1271. |

Section

The word "various" is omitted as unnecessary.
### §5104A. Binding nature of favorable findings

Any finding favorable to the claimant as described in section 5104(b)(4) of this title shall be binding on all subsequent adjudicators within the Department, unless clear and convincing evidence is shown to the contrary to rebut such favorable finding.

(Added Pub. L. 115–55, §2(f)(1), Aug. 23, 2017, 131 Stat. 1107.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to all claims for which the Secretary of Veterans Affairs provides notice of a decision under section 5104 of this title on or after the later of 540 days after Aug. 23, 2017, or 30 days after the date on which the Secretary submits to Congress a certification of certain capabilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs to carry out the new appeals system established by Pub. L. 115–55 and to address appeals of decisions on legacy claims, with provision for early applicability of the new appeals system to certain claims, see section 2(x) of Pub. L. 115–55, set out as an Effective Date of 2017 Amendment note under section 101 of this title, and bracketed note thereunder.
#### S. O. BEREN v. O. G. COULTER et al.

No. 4861.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

June 22, 1954.

Jochems, Sargent *&*Blaes, Wichita, Kan., and McKay & McKay, El Dorado, Kan., for appellant.

Blackburn & Hampton, Great Bend, Kan., and Depew, Stanley, Weigand, Hook & Curfman, Wichita, Kan., for ap-pellees.

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and BRATTON and HUXMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed on motion of appellant.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Cell Biology Integrated Review Group; Development—1 Study Section.                    

*Date:*                         February 4, 2019.                    

*Time:*                         7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Sir Francis Drake Hotel, 450 Powell Street at Sutter, San Francisco, CA 94102.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Thomas Beres, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5148, MSC 7840, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-1175,                         *berestm@mail.nih.gov.*

This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 18, 2019.

Natasha M. Copeland,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2019-00158 Filed 1-24-19; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
§ 1110.501 Independent. ( a ) An Accredited Conformity Assessment Body that is an independent third party conformity assessment body is one that is not owned, managed, or controlled by a Person or Certified Person that is the subject of attestation or audit by the Accredited Conformity Assessment Body. ( 1 ) A Person or Certified Person is considered to own, manage, or control a third party conformity assessment body if any one of the following characteristics applies: ( i ) The Person or Certified Person holds a 10 percent or greater ownership interest, whether direct or indirect, in the third party conformity assessment body. Indirect ownership interest is calculated by successive multiplication of the ownership percentages for each link in the ownership chain;
( ii ) The third party conformity assessment body and the Person or Certified Person are owned by a common “parent” entity;
( iii ) The Person or Certified Person has the ability to appoint a majority of the third party conformity assessment body's senior internal governing body (such as, but not limited to, a board of directors), the ability to appoint the presiding official (such as, but not limited to, the chair or president) of the third party conformity assessment body's senior internal governing body, and/or the ability to hire, dismiss, or set the compensation level for third party conformity assessment body personnel; or
( iv ) The third party conformity assessment body is under a contract to the Person or Certified Person that explicitly limits the services the third party conformity assessment body may perform for other customers and/or explicitly limits which or how many other entities may also be customers of the third party conformity assessment body.
( 2 ) A state or local government office of Inspector General or Auditor General and a Person or Certified Person that is a department or agency of the same state or local government, respectively, are not considered to be owned by a common “parent” entity under paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this section.
( b ) [Reserved]
NRC FINDS NO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS FROM

PROPOSED URANIUM ENRICHMENT PLANT IN IDAHO

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has concluded that there are no significant 

environmental impacts that would preclude licensing a proposed uranium enrichment facility in 

Bonneville County, Idaho.

In its Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the proposed Eagle Rock 

Enrichment Facility, the NRC staff said environmental impacts from the facility would be 

generally small, and recommended issuing the license. The staff published the results of its 

technical review of the application in a Safety Evaluation Report issued in September. That 

report concluded that operation of the facility as proposed would not pose undue risk to worker 

and public health and safety.

AREVA Enrichment Services (AES) submitted an application to construct and operate 

the facility on Dec. 30, 2008. The facility would use gas centrifuge technology to enrich uranium 

hexafluoride up to 5 percent in the isotope uranium-235. The enriched uranium would be used to 

manufacture nuclear fuel for commercial nuclear power reactors.

In the FEIS, the NRC staff assessed the potential environmental impacts from 

preconstruction activities, construction, operation and eventual decommissioning of the proposed 

facility. The staff assessed the impacts on land use, historic and cultural resources, visual and 

scenic resources, air quality, geology and soils, water resources, ecological resources, noise, 

transportation, public and occupational health, waste management, socioeconomics, and 

environmental justice. The staff also considered public comments on the Draft Environmental 

Impact Statement, which was published in July 2010.

The NRC’s Atomic Safety and Licensing Board is conducting an adjudicatory hearing on 

the staff’s safety review of the application. A hearing on the environmental review is expected to 

be held this summer. An agency decision on whether to grant a license can only occur after the 

hearings are concluded.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-023 February 14, 2011
The FEIS is available on the NRC website at 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1945/. A copy will be available at 

the Idaho Falls Public Library, 457 West Broadway, in Idaho Falls. A notice of publication will 

be published soon in the Federal Register. The September 2010 Safety Evaluation Report is 

available at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1951/. More 

information about the application and the NRC’s review process is available at 

http://www.nrc.gov/materials/fuel-cycle-fac/arevanc.html. 

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.
f

B.C.D. 00-42

OCT 2 3 2000

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Salt Lake City Southern Railroad Company, Inc.

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning the

continued status of Salt Lake City Southern Railroad Company, Inc. (SLCS), B.A.

No. 5730, as an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. §231 et

seq.XRRA) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. §351 et 

seq.XRUIA).

In Surface Transportation Board (STB) decision, Finance Docket No. 33803

decided on October 18, 1999, Utah Railway Company (UTAH) (BA. No. 2746) filed

a verified notice of exemption to acquire the capital stock of SLCS. According to

the STB decision, SLCS operated 24.95 miles of rail fine from milepost 798.74 at

Ninth South Street in Salt Lake City to milepost 775.19 at the Salt Lake

County/Utah County boundary line near Mount (including the 1.4 mile Lovendahl

Spur connection with the main fine at 790.52), in Salt Lake County, Utah. The

decision states that in an agreement between UTAH and SLCS’s parent company,

RailTex, Inc., UTAH was to purchase all capital stock of SLCS and place the

shares into a voting trust. The Board notes that in STB decision Finance Docket

No. 33785, decided August 24, 1999, UTAH filed a notice to acquire rights to

operate over the same rail line. In STB decision Docket No. AB-520, decided

September 16, 1999, the Utah Transit Authority (UTA), a non-carrier, filed an 

adverse application requesting that the STB find that the public convenience and

necessity require or permit the abandonment by SLCS ofthe same rail fine. That

decision states that UTA wanted to replace SLCS with UTAH as the operator of

that line.

On October 27,1999, the Chief ofthe Audit and Compliance Section ofthe Board’s

Bureau of Fiscal Operation requested from Ms. Felita Rodriguez, Manager HRS

of SLCS, the status of SLCS’s common carrier operations. In response to that

request, SLCS stated that SLCS had ceased rail operations on September 30,1999

and last compensated its employees on October 18, 1999. The response further

stated that all of SLCS’s assets were sold to UTAH.

Section 202.11 (20 CFR 202.11) of the Board’s regulations states:

The employer status of any company or person shall terminate

whenever such company or person loses any of the characteristics

essential to the existence of an employer status.

BA# 5730
-2-

Salt Lake City Southern Railroad Company, Inc.

The information summarized above indicates that SLCS no longer possesses the

characteristics of an operating railroad company. The Board therefore finds that

effective with the close of business on October 18,1999, the last day on which it

paid compensation reportable to this agency, SLCS ceased to be an employer

under the RRA and the RUIA.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**








**Performance
      Capital Management, LLC**





CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


PRINCIPAL
      FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Performance Capital
      Management, LLC (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), David J. Caldwell, as Chief Operations Officer of the Company, and
      Edward M. Rucker, as Accounting Manager of the Company, each hereby certifies,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
                David J. CaldwellDavid
                J. CaldwellChief
                Operations OfficerAugust
                13, 2007








/s/
                Edward M. RuckerEdward
                M. RuckerAccounting
                ManagerAugust
                13, 2007








The
      material contained in this exhibit is not deemed “filed” with the Commission and
      is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under
      the
      Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      as
      amended, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any
      general incorporation language contained in such filing, except to the extent
      that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2007 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2007

To increase the amount allowed as a child tax credit and to repeal the 
sunset imposed on the modifications to the child tax credit made by the 
  Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2003

Mr. Davis of Alabama introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To increase the amount allowed as a child tax credit and to repeal the 
sunset imposed on the modifications to the child tax credit made by the 
  Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ACCELERATION OF CHILD TAX CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (a) of section 24 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to child tax credit) is amended to read 
as follows:
    ``(a) Allowance of Credit.--There shall be allowed as a credit 
against the tax imposed by this chapter for the taxable year with 
respect to each qualifying child of the taxpayer an amount equal to 
$1,500.''.
    (b) Repeal of Sunset.--Title IX of the Economic Growth and Tax 
Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (relating to sunset of provisions of 
such Act) shall not apply to the amendments made by section 201 of such 
Act.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2002.
                                 <all>
```
NRC REVISES AGENCY’S ENFORCEMENT POLICY 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has published a major revision to the agency’s 

Enforcement Policy, which contains policy and procedures the agency follows to respond to 

apparent violations of NRC requirements. 

 The revisions, published today in the Federal Register, represent the first major revision 

to the Enforcement Policy since 1995. The policy has been updated since that time to reflect the 

NRC’s Reactor Oversight Process and the use of Alternative Dispute Resolution. The current 

revision will ensure the Enforcement Policy closely parallels agency practice, and will 

incorporate enforcement issues associated with combined licenses for proposed new reactors, the 

construction phase of proposed fuel facilities, and new requirements related to safeguards and 

security. 

 “The NRC’s Enforcement Policy is a crucial tool in our mission to protect public health 

and safety, the common defense and security, and the environment,” said NRC Chairman 

Gregory B. Jaczko. “It emphasizes the importance of compliance with NRC regulatory 

requirements, as well as the prompt identification and prompt, comprehensive correction of 

violations.” 

 A proposed revision to the Enforcement Policy was published for public comment on 

Sept. 15, 2008, with a corrected version published Oct. 16, 2008. Today’s Federal Register

notice with the final revised policy is available online at 

http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-24561.pdf. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-174 September 30, 2010