alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 400
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 400 appear at 78 FR 69289, Nov. 19, 2013.

§ 400.1 Scope. ( a ) This part sets forth the regulations, including the rules of practice and procedure, of the Foreign-Trade Zones Board with regard to foreign-trade zones (FTZs or zones) in the United States pursuant to the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u). It includes the substantive and procedural rules for the authorization of zones and for the Board's regulation of zone activity. The purpose of zones as stated in the Act is to “expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and other purposes.” The regulations provide the legal framework for accomplishing this purpose in the context of evolving U.S. economic and trade policy, and economic factors relating to international competition.
( b ) Part 146 of the customs regulations (19 CFR part 146) governs zone operations, including the admission of merchandise into zones, zone activity involving such merchandise, and the transfer of merchandise from zones.
( c ) To the extent zones are “activated” under U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) procedures in 19 CFR part 146, and only for the purposes specified in the Act (19 U.S.C. 81c), zones are treated for purposes of the tariff laws and customs entry procedures as being outside the customs territory of the United States. Under zone procedures, foreign and domestic merchandise may be admitted into zones for operations such as storage, exhibition, assembly, manufacture and processing, without being subject to formal customs entry procedures and payment of duties, unless and until the foreign merchandise enters customs territory for domestic consumption. At that time, the importer ordinarily has a choice of paying duties either at the rate applicable to the foreign material in its condition as admitted into a zone, or if used in production activity, to the emerging product. Quota restrictions do not normally apply to foreign goods in zones. The Board can deny or limit the use of zone procedures in specific cases on public interest grounds. Merchandise moved into zones for export (zone-restricted status) may be considered exported for purposes such as federal excise tax rebates and customs drawback. Foreign merchandise (tangible personal property) admitted to a zone and domestic merchandise held in a zone for exportation are exempt from certain state and local *ad valorem* taxes (19 U.S.C. 81o(e)). Articles admitted into zones for purposes not specified in the Act shall be subject to the tariff laws and regular entry procedures, including the payment of applicable duties, taxes, and fees.
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

**SUBSIDIARIES OF AVOCENT CORPORATION**

**As of December 31, 2003**

 

1.                                       AvocentHuntsville Corp., an Alabama corporation

 

2.                                       Avocent ServicesCorporation, a Texas corporation

 

3.                                       AvocentInternational, Ltd., an Ireland corporation

 

4.                                       Avocent ComputertechnikGmbH, a Germany corporation

 

5.                                       Avocent RedmondCorp., a Washington corporation

 

6.                                       ApexInternational, Inc., a Washington corporation

 

7.                                       Apex PCSolutions, Ltd., a Barbados corporation

 

8.                                       Avocent NevadaLLC, a Washington corporation

 

9.                                       Avocent Texas,L.P., a Texas limited partnership

 

10.                                 Avocent Texas I, LLC,a Washington limited liability company

 

11.                                 Avocent Texas II, LLC,a Washington limited liability company

 

12.                                 Avocent Utah Corp., aDelaware corporation

 

13.                                 Avocent CaliforniaAcquisition Corp., a California corporation (subsequently merged with CrystalLink Technologies and name changed to Avocent California Corp.)

 

14.                                 Nihon Avocent KK, aJapan corporation

 

15.                                 Avocent China LTD, aHong Kong corporation

 

1

----
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 15 / Wednesday, January 23, 2019 / Presidential Documents 205 

Presidential Determination No. 2019–09 of January 16, 2019 

Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 303 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as Amended 

Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, including section 303 of the Defense 

Production Act of 1950, as amended (the ‘‘Act’’) (50 U.S.C. 4533), I hereby 

determine, pursuant to section 303(a)(5) of the Act, that the domestic production capability for inert materials for munitions is essential to the national 

defense. 

Without Presidential action under section 303 of the Act, United States 

industry cannot reasonably be expected to provide the production capability 

for inert materials for munitions adequately and in a timely manner. Further, 

purchases, purchase commitments, or other action pursuant to section 303 

of the Act are the most cost-effective, expedient, and practical alternative 

method for meeting the need for this critical capability. 

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal 

Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, January 16, 2019 

[FR Doc. 2019–00099 

Filed 1–22–19; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 5001–06–P 


khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with PRESDOC3Trump.EPS</GPH>
#### Edwin R. La Vin, Respondent, v. Russell C. La Vin et al., Defendants, and Lebis Hotel Management Corp, et al., Appellants.

No opinion, Carswell, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
#### § 950.110 CCA Prohibited discrimination.

Discrimination for or against any individual or group on account of race, ethnicity, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy and gender identity), national origin, age, disability, sexual orientation, genetic information, or any other non-merit-based factor is prohibited in all aspects of the management and the execution of the CFC. Nothing herein denies eligibility to any organization, which is otherwise eligible under this part to participate in the CFC, merely because such organization is organized by, on behalf of, or to serve persons of a particular race, ethnicity, color, religion, sex, gender identity, national origin, age, disability, sexual orientation, or genetic background.
CONSULAR INFORMATION SHEET -- AZERBAIJAN

----

26 JAN 98
Employer Status Determination

The Boat Company

This is the determination ofthe Railroad Retirement Board concerning the

continuing status of The Boat Company (BC) (BA. No. 9234) as an employer

under the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231, et S£Q.) (RRA) and the

Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act ((45 U.S.C. § 351, et sea-) (RUIA). BC

was determined to be an employer under the RRA and RUIA effective

December 1, 1982.

BC terminated its operations on April 3,1983, as noted in Legal Opinion L-83-

129 (June 17, 1983). However, BC remained a covered employer because it was

not then known whether BC would resume its operations as a rail car ferry

service. We have now learned that on May 15,1985, BC was dissolved as a 

corporation.

In view ofthe foregoing, it is the determination ofthe Railroad Retirement

Board that The Boat Company ceased to be an employer covered under the

RRA and RUIA as of May 15,1985, the date on which its corporate structure

was dissolved and it could no longer operate as a railroad employer.

Jerome F. Kever

BA# 9234
### §21501. Findings

Congress finds the following:

(1) Megan Nicole Kanka, who was 7 years old, was abducted, sexually assaulted, and murdered in 1994, in the State of New Jersey by a violent predator living across the street from her home. Unbeknownst to Megan Kanka and her family, he had been convicted previously of a sex offense against a child.

(2) In 1996, Congress adopted Megan's Law (Public Law 104–145) as a means to encourage States to protect children by identifying the whereabouts of sex offenders and providing the means to monitor their activities.

(3) In 2006, Congress passed the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 (Public Law 109–248) to protect children and the public at large by establishing a comprehensive national system for the registration and notification to the public and law enforcement officers of convicted sex offenders.

(4) Law enforcement reports indicate that known child-sex offenders are traveling internationally.

(5) The commercial sexual exploitation of minors in child sex trafficking and pornography is a global phenomenon. The International Labour Organization has estimated that 1,8000,000 1 children worldwide are victims of child sex trafficking and pornography each year.

(6) Child sex tourism, where an individual travels to a foreign country and engages in sexual activity with a child in that country, is a form of child exploitation and, where commercial, child sex trafficking.

(Pub. L. 114–119, §2, Feb. 8, 2016, 130 Stat. 15.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Megan's Law, referred to in par. (2), is Pub. L. 104–145, May 17, 1996, 110 Stat. 1345, which amended former section 14071 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1996 Amendments note set out under section 13701 of Title 42 and Tables.

The Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006, referred to in par. (3), is Pub. L. 109–248, July 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 587, which enacted chapter 209 (§20901 et seq.) of this title and enacted, amended, and repealed numerous other sections and notes in the Code. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 2006 Act note set out under section 10101 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 16935 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

1 So in original. Probably should be "18,000,000".
Editorial Note on Part 4
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 80 FR 70154, Nov. 13, 2015.

§ 4.2 Public reading rooms. ( a ) Records that the FOIA requires to be made available for public inspection and copying are accessible electronically through the Department's “Electronic FOIA Library” on the Department's website, *http://www.doc.gov*, which includes links to websites for those components that maintain Electronic FOIA Libraries. Each component of the Department is responsible for determining which of its records are required to be made available, as well as identifying additional records of interest to the public that are appropriate for disclosure, and for making those records available either in its own Electronic Library or in the Department's central Electronic FOIA Library. Components that maintain their own Electronic FOIA Libraries are designated as such in Appendix A to this part. Each component shall also maintain and make available electronically a current subject-matter index of the records made available electronically. Each component shall ensure that posted records and indices are updated regularly, at least quarterly.
( b ) If the requester does not have access to the Internet and wishes to obtain information regarding publicly available information, he or she may contact the component's FOIA office. Appendix A to this part contains the contact information for the components' FOIA offices. Some components may also maintain physical public reading rooms. These components and their contact information are listed in Appendix A to this part.
( c ) The Department and its components shall maintain and make available electronically for public inspection: ( 1 ) Copies of records that have been released and— ( i ) That the component that maintains them determines, because of their subject matter, have become or are likely to become the subject of subsequent requests for substantially the same records by other requesters, or
( ii ) That have been requested three or more times by different requesters;
( 2 ) A general index of the records available for public inspection—for purposes of these regulations, a general index includes records available through a search capability on the Department or component's website, such as a person finder;
( 3 ) Final opinions and orders, including concurring and dissenting opinions made in the adjudication of cases;
( 4 ) Those statements of policy and interpretations that have been adopted by a component and are not published in the Federal Register; and
( 5 ) Administrative staff manuals and instructions to staff that affect a member of the public.
[79 FR 62558, Oct. 20, 2014, as amended at 83 FR 39589, Aug. 10, 2018]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-4667

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

AARON MICHAEL DOHOGN,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. Loretta C. Biggs, District Judge. (1:15-cr-00121-LCB-1)

Submitted: May 18, 2023 Decided: May 22, 2023

Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: Louis C. Allen, Federal Public Defender, John A. Dusenbury, Jr., Assistant 

Federal Public Defender, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, 

Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Sandra J. Hairston, United States Attorney, 

Laura J. Dildine, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-4667 Doc: 24 Filed: 05/22/2023 Pg: 1 of 3
2

PER CURIAM:

In 2015, Aaron Michael Dohogn pleaded guilty to possession of machine guns, in 

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(o), and the district court sentenced him to 52 months’ 

imprisonment, followed by three years’ supervised release. In 2020, the district court 

revoked Dohogn’s supervised release and sentenced him to eight months’ imprisonment 

followed by a further two-year term of supervised release. The court then again revoked 

Dohogn’s supervised release, sentencing him in November 2022 to 14 months’ 

imprisonment with no term of supervised release to follow. Dohogn seeks to appeal this 

last revocation judgment. While this appeal was pending, Dohogn was released from 

custody. 

“When a case or controversy ceases to exist—either due to a change in the facts or 

the law—the litigation is moot, and [our] subject matter jurisdiction ceases to exist also.” 

Porter v. Clarke, 852 F.3d 358, 363 (4th Cir. 2017) (internal quotation marks omitted). 

“Because mootness is jurisdictional, we can and must consider it even if neither party has 

raised it.” United States v. Ketter, 908 F.3d 61, 65 (4th Cir. 2018). Dohogn has already 

served his sentence and faces no additional term of supervised release; thus, there is no 

longer a live controversy. Dohogn’s challenge to the sentence imposed upon the most 

recent revocation of his supervised release is therefore moot. See United States v. Hardy, 

545 F.3d 280, 283-84 (4th Cir. 2008).

USCA4 Appeal: 22-4667 Doc: 24 Filed: 05/22/2023 Pg: 2 of 3
3

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-4667 Doc: 24 Filed: 05/22/2023 Pg: 3 of 3
§ 30.29 Reporting of repairs and replacements. These guidelines will govern the reporting of the following: ( a ) The return of goods previously imported only for repair and alteration. ( 1 ) The return of goods not licensed by a U.S. Government agency and not subject to the ITAR, temporarily imported for repair and alternation, and declared as such on importation shall have Schedule B number 9801.10.0000. The value shall only include parts and labor. The value of the original product shall not be included. If the value of the parts and labor is over $2,500, then EEI must be filed.
( 2 ) The return of goods licensed by a U.S. Government agency or subject to the ITAR, temporarily imported for repair or alteration, and declared as such on importation shall have Schedule B number 9801.10.0000. In the value field, report the value of the parts and labor. In the license value field, report the value designated on the export license that corresponds to the commodity being exported if required by the licensing agency. EEI must be filed regardless of value.
( b ) *Goods that are covered under warranty.* ( 1 ) Goods that are reexported after repair under warranty shall follow the procedures in paragraph (a)(1) or (2) of this section as appropriate. It is recommended that the bill of lading, air waybill, or other loading documents include the statement, “This product was repaired under warranty.”
( 2 ) Goods that are replaced under warranty at no charge to the customer shall include the statement, “Product replaced under warranty, value for EEI purposes” on the bill of lading, air waybill, or other commercial loading documents. Place the notation below the proof of filing citation, postdeparture filing citation, AES downtime filing citation, exemption or exclusion legend on the commercial loading documents. Report the Schedule B number or Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA) commodity classification number of the replacement parts. For goods not licensed by a U.S. Government agency, report the value of the replacement parts in accordance with § 30.6(a)(17). For goods licensed by a U.S. Government agency, report the value and license value in accordance with § 30.6(a)(17) and § 30.6(b)(15) respectively.
[73 FR 31555, June 2, 2008, as amended at 78 FR 16380, Mar. 14, 2013; 82 FR 18391, Apr. 19, 2017]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 16, 2014

Order 

December 16, 2014

150183 & (19)

CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY OF 

AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v

SUNBEAM PRODUCTS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

SC: 150183

COA: 321068

Macomb CC: 2012-004270-NP

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the stipulation to dismiss the application for leave to 

appeal is GRANTED. The dismissal is with prejudice and without fees or costs to either 

party.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2324 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2324

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to accelerate the increase 
in the child tax credit and to expand the refundability of such credit, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 4, 2003

 Mrs. Capito introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to accelerate the increase 
in the child tax credit and to expand the refundability of such credit, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Family Fairness in Taxing Act of 
2003''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF CHILD TAX CREDIT.

    (a) Acceleration of Increase in Credit.--Subsection (a) of section 
24 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to child tax credit) 
is amended to read as follows:
    ``(a) Allowance of Credit.--There shall be allowed as a credit 
against the tax imposed by this chapter for the taxable year with 
respect to each qualifying child of the taxpayer an amount equal to 
$1,000.''.
    (b) Expansion of Credit Refundability.--
            (1) In general.--Clause (i) of section 24(d)(1)(B) of the 
        Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to portion of credit 
        refundable) is amended to read as follows:
                            ``(i) 15 percent of so much of the 
                        taxpayer's earned income (within the meaning of 
                        section 32) which is taken into account in 
                        computing taxable income for the taxable year 
                        as exceeds $7,500, or''.
            (2) Conforming amendment.--Section 24(d) of such Code is 
        amended by striking paragraph (3).
    (c) Increase in Age of Qualifying Child.--Section 24(c)(1)(B) of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining qualifying child) is 
amended by striking ``age of 17'' and inserting ``age of 19''.
    (d) Effective Dates.--
            (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), the 
        amendments made by this section shall apply to taxable years 
        beginning after December 31, 2002.
            (2) Subsection (c).--The amendment made by subsection (c) 
        shall apply to calendar years beginning after 2002.
                                 <all>
```