alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2  Certification Pursuant to pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended  I, Hui Lin, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of AIDA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. As the registrant's certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and I have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the  registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  5. As the registrant's certifying officer, I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.   /s/ Hui Lin Hui Lin Chief Financial Officer  Date: May 14, 2007
### §2605. Suits to recover wrongful or fraudulent payments

The Postal Service shall request the Attorney General to bring a suit to recover with interest any payment made from moneys of, or credit granted by, the Postal Service as a result of—

(1) mistake;

(2) fraudulent representations;

(3) collusion; or

(4) misconduct of an officer or employee of the Postal Service.

(Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 745.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1971, pursuant to Resolution No. 71–9 of the Board of Governors. See section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note preceding section 101 of this title.
TO:

FROM:

SUBJECT:

U n i t e d S t a t e s G o v e r n m e n t

M e m o r a n d u m

FORM G-l I5f (1-92)

' R a i l r o a d R e t i r e m e n t B o a r d

L-2001-13

AUG 2 0 2001

Assistant to the Labor Member

General Counsel

S.S.A. No. 

Back Pay

This is in replW c^ounnquiry of August 13,2001, regarding the c re d ib ility of back pay 

awarded t o | fl.

On June 6,1998, Mr. ^ ^ ^ | w a s dismissed from service with his railroad employer. On 

March 2, 2000, he was reinstated to his railroad service by order of the Railroad 

Adjustment Board, subject to certain conditions1. On November 28, 2000, the Railroad 

Adjustment Board awarded Mr. | |s i x months retroactive pay for the period he w as 

in dismissed status. Since the period for which Mr. ^ ^ H w a s dism issed w as 

substantially longer than six months, you inquire as to which m onths the award of back 

pay should be attributed to.

Back pay may constitute pay for time lost if certain conditions are met. First, the back 

pay must be intended to com pensate the employee for time lost or for service in a less 

remunerative position than that in which the employee would have served absen t som e 

action by the employer. Second, the back pay must be paid with respect to an 

identifiable period of time. Third, the back pay must be paid with respect to months in 

which there existed an employer-employee relation or, if such relation did not exist, as 

in the case of discharge, the back pay award also included reinstatem ent with full rights.

See Legal Opinior L-90-28 (copy attached).

The back pay awd-d in this instance is clearly intended to com pensate the em ployee for 

time lost and included reinstatement with full rights. It is my opinion that the fact that the 

six months to which the back pay is attributable within the 21 month period for which the 

employee w as dismissed are not specified does not mean that the back pay is not

' Mr. required to pass a physical examination and drug screening before he could be reinstated. He was

also required to undergo the recertification process for his engineer’s license, including appropriate tr a in in g , and to

pass a rules examination.
attributable to an identifiable period of time. In reporting the award of back pay, Mr.

| railroad employer m ust report a specific six months. The Board should accept 

the employer’s determination as to which six months within the 21 month period to 

credit the back pay2.

Attachment

Kmckscm

MISG 618.mcl.doc

y \i? -

2 This conclusion assumes that Mr. | | met the requirements imposed by the Railroad Adjustment Board and

was reinstated. The decision awarding the six months back pay states that “On information and belief, [Mr. |

has complied with these conditions and has been reinstated to service.”
Certification in Armenia

----
```

[House Report 107-293]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                    107-293

======================================================================

 
 PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 3009, ANDEAN TRADE PROMOTION AND 
                          DRUG ERADICATION ACT

                                _______
                                

  November 16 (legislative day, November 15), 2001.--Referred to the 
                House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

 Mr. Diaz-Balart, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 289]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 289, by a non-record vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                summary of provisions of the resolution

    The resolution provides for consideration in the House of 
H.R. 3009, the Andean Trade Promotion and Drug Eradication Act, 
under a closed rule. The rule provides one hour of debate 
equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means.
    The rule waives all points of order against consideration 
of the bill. This includes a waiver of clause 4(a) of rule XIII 
requiring a three-day layover of the committee report. The rule 
also provides that the amendment recommended by the Committee 
on Ways and Means now printed in the bill shall be considered 
as adopted.
    Finally, the rule provides one motion to recommit with or 
without instructions.

                                  

```
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference of our report, dated March 14, 2006 relating to our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Entravision Communications Corporation as of December 31, 2005 and for each of the two years in the period then ended and the financialstatement schedule appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Entravision Communications Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2006 in the previously filed Registration Statements of Entravision Communications Corporation on Form S-8(File Nos. 333-82718 and 333-54438) and on Form S-3 (File No. 333-87894). 

/s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP 

Pasadena, California 

March 14, 2007
### §7312. Special medical advisory group

(a) The Secretary shall establish an advisory committee to be known as the special medical advisory group. The advisory group shall advise the Secretary, through the Under Secretary for Health, and the Under Secretary for Health directly, relative to the care and treatment of disabled veterans and other matters pertinent to the Administration.

(b) Members of the special medical advisory group shall be appointed by the Secretary upon the recommendation of the Under Secretary for Health. The special medical advisory group shall be composed of—

(1) members of the medical, dental, podiatric, optometric, and allied scientific professions;

(2) other individuals considered by the Under Secretary for Health to have experience pertinent to the mission of the Administration; and

(3) a disabled veteran.

(c) The special medical advisory group shall meet on a regular basis as prescribed by the Secretary. The number, terms of service, pay, and allowances of members of the advisory group shall be prescribed in accordance with existing law and regulations.

(d) Not later than February 1 of each year, the special medical advisory group shall submit to the Secretary and the Congress a report on the activities of the advisory group during the preceding fiscal year. No report shall be required under this subsection after December 31, 2004.

(Added Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §401(a)(3), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 215; amended Pub. L. 102–405, title III, §302(c)(1), Oct. 9, 1992, 106 Stat. 1984; Pub. L. 103–446, title XII, §1201(e)(20), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4686; Pub. L. 106–419, title IV, §403(c)(5), Nov. 1, 2000, 114 Stat. 1864.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2000—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 106–419 inserted at end "No report shall be required under this subsection after December 31, 2004."

1994—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 103–446 substituted "the activities of the advisory group" for "the advisory groups activities".

1992—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 102–405 substituted "Under Secretary for Health" for "Chief Medical Director" wherever appearing.
```

[107th Congress Public Law 54]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ054.107]

[[Page 115 STAT. 270]]

Public Law 107-54
107th Congress

                            Joint Resolution

 
   Providing for the reappointment of Anne d'Harnoncourt as a citizen 
           regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 
         Institution. <<NOTE: Oct. 24, 2001 -  [S.J. Res. 19]>> 

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, 
in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the 
expiration of the term of Anne d'Harnoncourt of Pennsylvania, is filled 
by reappointment of the incumbent for a term of 6 years. The 
reappointment shall take effect on December 29, 2001.

    Approved October 24, 2001.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S.J. Res. 19:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 147 (2001):
            Sept. 13, considered and passed Senate.
            Oct. 9, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE, ACCOUNTING AND

FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of New PacificVentures, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2006, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I Brent Petterson, Secretary/Treasurer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

   (1)  the Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

   (2)  the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/Brent PettersonBrent PettersonSecretary/TreasurerSeptember 14, 2006
§ 2012.3 Export certificates. ( a ) Beef may only be entered as a product of a participating country if the importer makes a declaration to the Customs Service, in the form and manner determined by the Customs Service, that a valid export certificate is in effect with respect to the beef.
( b ) To be valid, an export certificate shall: ( 1 ) Be issued by or under the supervision of the government of the participating country;
( 2 ) Specify the name of the exporter, the product description and quantity, and the calendar year for which the export certificate is in effect;
( 3 ) Be distinct and uniquely identifiable; and
( 4 ) Be used in the calendar year for which it is in effect.
### **CHAPTER 27—GOVERNMENT INTERESTS IN PATENTS**

Sec.
[266.
Repealed.]
267.
Time for taking action in Government applications.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1965**—Pub. L. 89–83, §8, July 24, 1965, 79 Stat. 261, struck out item 266 "Issue of patents without fees to Government employees".
#### § 273.1 Purpose.

To provide policy direction for Federal agencies in their transition to use of the metric system of measurement.
---

---

Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Dror David, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       
          This Annual Report on Form 20-F of Nova Measuring Instruments, Ltd. (the
          Company) for the period ended December 31, 2005 (the
          Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 29, 2006

| |  | /s/ Dror David
Dror DavidChief Financial Officer
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------

E - 9

---

---
EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Blackwell & Northern Railway Company, Inc.

This is a determination ofthe Railroad Retirement Board concerning the 

status ofBlackwell & Northern Railway Company, Inc. (BNR) as an

employer under the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231 et seep) (RRA) 

and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. § 351 et seep)

(RUIA).

BNR was incorporated on April 5, 2000. In Surface Transportation Board

(STB) Finance Docket No. 34265, service date November 4, 2002, BNR

filed a notice of exemption to operate 35.26 miles ofrail line owned by the

State of Oklahoma by and through the Oklahoma Department of

Transportation and Blackwell Industries Authority. The rail line extends

from Blackwell, Oklahoma to Wellington, Kansas. BNR replaced South 

Kansas and Oklahoma Railroad, Inc. (B.A. No. 3880), which had been

operating over the line. In response to a letter dated December 13, 2002, 

from the Board’s Chief ofAudit and Compliance, Mr. Robert Wagner,

President ofBNR, stated that it began operations on May 15, 2000, with 

three employees.

Section 1(a)(1) ofthe Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231(a)(1)),

insofar as relevant here, defines a covered employer as:

(i) any carrier by railroad subject to the jurisdiction ofthe

Surface Transportation Board under Part A ofsubtitle IV oftitle 49,

United States Code;

Section 1 ofthe RUIA contains essentially the same definition, as does

section 3231 ofthe Railroad Retirement Tax Act.

The evidence ofrecord establishes that BNR is a rail carrier operating in

interstate commerce. Accordingly, it is determined that Blackwell &

Northern Railway Company, Inc. became an employer within the meaning of

section l(a)(l)(i) ofthe Railroad Retirement Act and the corresponding

BA#2889
-2-

Blackwell & Northern Railway Company, Inc

provision ofthe Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act effective May 15,

2000, the date its employees were first compensated. [CF. Rev. Rul. 82-100,

1982-1 C.B. 155, wherein the IRS held that a company became an employer

under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act on the date it hired employees to 

perform functions directly related to its carrier operations.]

V. M. Speakman, Jr.

Jerome F. Kever
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Link Energy LLC (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas
M. Matthews, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company
and I, H. Keith Kaelber, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.




/s/ THOMAS M. MATTHEWS                                         November 19, 2003
Thomas M. Matthews
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer


/s/ H. KEITH KAELBER                                           November 19, 2003
H. Keith Kaelber
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

      The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Act and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
#### § 630.505 Restoration after appeal.

When an employee is restored to an agency as a result of an appeal, the agency shall reestablish his leave account as a credit or charge as it was at the time of separation.
WHAT TO EXPECT WHEN THE TAX POLICE COME IN RUSSIA

----

**June 1998**
AUTHOR:  OLGA ANANINA
INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT, U.S. & FOREIGN COMMERCIAL SERVICE AND U.S.DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 1998.  ALL RIGHTS RESERVED OUTSIDE OF THE UNITEDSTATES
1.  On May 28, 1998, Price Waterhouse CIS Law Offices (PW) and Independent Press co-hosteda seminar "Russian Tax Disputes: How to protect Your Rights when the Tax Police Visit." Although making an effort to approach Western standards, Russian tax system remains to bebased on exceptions and privileges as well as distinct for unpredictability.  These qualities of thecurrent tax system hinder foreign investment and create headaches for the enterprises alreadyoperating in Russia.  As the law continues to evolve and tax bodies become more active, investorsshould know how to protect their rights if the tax police come.  PW Partners William Butler andMaryann Gashi-Butler, Head of Section for Taxation of Foreign and Juridical Natural PersonsGennadi Ryzhov and leading specialist of this section Sergey Aryamov, Senior Lawyers at PWCIS Law Offices BV Alexander Podolsky, and Natalia Scherbakova, Tax Manager at Coopersand Lybrand in St. Petersburg, shared their expertise and advice with the seminar participants.
2.  Tax Police is an enforcement body governed by a set of laws, presidential decrees, and orders. According to the Federal Law of the Russian Federation No. 5238-I of June 24 1993 "Concerningthe Federal Organs of the Tax Police", the Tax Police is to:
§ 200.114 Fees and bills. ( a ) In accordance with 15 U.S.C. 271 *et seq.,* fees are charged for all measurement services performed by NIST, unless waived by the Director, or the Director's designee, when deemed to be in the interest of the Government. The above-mentioned statutes authorize the issuance from time to time of appropriate regulations regarding the payment of fees, the limits of tolerance on standards submitted for verification, and related matters.
( b ) The minimum fee for any service request accepted by NIST is $10, unless otherwise indicated in SP 250. If apparatus is returned without testing, a minimum charge of $10 may be made to cover handling. Charges commensurate with the work performed will be assessed for calibrations which cannot be completed because of faulty operation of the customer's device. Fees for calibrations or tests include the cost of preparation of an NIST report. Remittances should be made payable to the National Institute of Standards & Technology.
Editorial Note on Subpart C of Part 9701
Editorial Note: At 73 FR 58435, Oct. 7, 2008, the application of subpart C to part 9701 was rescinded.

§ 9701.312 Maximum rates. ( a ) DHS may not pay any employee an annual rate of basic pay in excess of the rate for level III of the Executive Schedule, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) DHS may establish the maximum annual rate of basic pay for members of the SES at the rate for level II of the Executive Schedule if DHS obtains the certification specified in 5 U.S.C. 5307(d).
### SUBCHAPTER II—PROCUREMENT AND SUPPLY