alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2022291EN.01005701.xml

| 10.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 291/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 291/57

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 169/2019

of 14 June 2019

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2022/2161]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2205 of 29 November 2017 on detailed rules concerning the procedures for the notification of commercial vehicles with major or dangerous deficiencies identified during a technical roadside inspection (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2205 of 29 November 2017 on detailed rules concerning the procedures for the notification of commercial vehicles with major or dangerous deficiencies identified during a technical roadside inspection (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 17ha (Directive 2014/47/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘17hb. | 32017 R 2205: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2205 of 29 November 2017 on detailed rules concerning the procedures for the notification of commercial vehicles with major or dangerous deficiencies identified during a technical roadside inspection (OJ L 314, 30.11.2017, p. 3).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘17hb.

32017 R 2205: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2205 of 29 November 2017 on detailed rules concerning the procedures for the notification of commercial vehicles with major or dangerous deficiencies identified during a technical roadside inspection (OJ L 314, 30.11.2017, p. 3).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2205 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 15 June 2019, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 14 June 2019.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 314, 30.11.2017, p. 3.

1

(*)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*

---
Banking in Tajikistan

----

**January 1999**
by Eleonora Yunusova and Philip H. de Leon
While banks in Tajikistan have not been rated by the major rating agencies and it is not as easy totransfer money in and out of the country as it may be in other NIS countries, there are signs thatthe banking sector is improving.  In the past year, the National Bank of Tajikistan (NBT) hasinstituted measures to reform and improve the sector.  These measures include raising capitalrequirements and signing reorganization agreements with larger banks.  In addition, internationaltechnical assistance is aimed at improving the regulation of the sector and increasing workingcapital available from banks to businesses.
**Capital Requirements**
No. I-09-043 

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331 

October 30, 2009 

E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

NRC ASSIGNS NEW INSPECTOR TO INDIAN POINT 2 

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia, Pa., 

have selected Odunayo (Ayo) Ayegbusi as the new resident inspector at 

Indian Point Unit 2 in Buchanan, N.Y. 

 He joins Senior Resident Inspector George Malone at Indian Point 

2. Two resident inspectors are also assigned to Indian Point 3. Both units 

are operated by Entergy Nuclear. 

 Ayegbusi joined the NRC’s Region I office in 2005 after earning a bachelor’s in 

electrical engineering from the University of Maryland. He is a graduate of the NRC’s Nuclear 

Safety Professional Development Program, a two-year training program that provides specialized 

training in nuclear safety and a broad perspective of NRC regulatory activities. He also 

completed a rigorous NRC inspector qualification program. Most recently, Ayegbusi was a 

reactor inspector in the Region I office, taking part in engineering inspections. 

 “Ayo Ayegbusi has the training and commitment to safety that will help the NRC carry 

out its mission of protecting people and the environment, and ensure the safe operation of Indian 

Point 2,” said NRC Region I Administrator Samuel J. Collins. 

 Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant site has at least two NRC Resident Inspectors. 

The NRC considers each Indian Point unit separately under the agency’s reactor oversight 

program. Therefore, four resident inspectors are assigned to the site. They serve as the agency's 

eyes and ears at the facility, conducting regular inspections, monitoring significant work 

projects, and interacting with plant workers and the public. Inspectors can serve for up to 7 years 

at any one site. 

 The Indian Point 2 resident inspectors can be reached at 914/739-9360. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region I 

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov
§ 10.15 Interpretations. ( a ) An interpretation of a Voluntary Product Standard may be obtained through the submission of a written request. The request shall identify the specific section of the standard involved.
( b ) In the case of PS 20-70, the “American Softwood Lumber Standard,” interpretations shall be made by the American Lumber Standards Committee (ALSC) under the procedures developed by the ALSC and found acceptable to NIST.
( c ) In the case of the other Voluntary Product Standards, interpretations shall be made by the appropriate Standing Committees under procedures developed by those committees and found acceptable to NIST.
[51 FR 22497, June 20, 1986, as amended at 55 FR 38315, Sept. 18, 1990]
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-020 February 3, 2005

NRC MEETING WITH PAKISTAN NUCLEAR REGULATORY AUTHORITY

A U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission delegation led by Mr. Ashok Thadani met with the

Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority (PNRA) for three days of technical discussions at the PNRA

headquarters in Islamabad, Pakistan, Feb. 1-3. 

Discussions provided the Pakistani Authorities with a comprehensive overview of the NRC's

regulatory approach to several civilian nuclear reactor safety technical issues, and gave the NRC staff a

better appreciation of the technical work being performed in Pakistan on similar issues. This is the first

visit by an NRC technical team to Pakistan.

 ###
B.C.D. 04-6 FEB 1 1 2004

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

I & M Rail Link, LLC (IMRL)

This is a determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning

the status of I & M Rail Link. LLC (IMRL) as an employer under the

Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. §231 et seep) (RRA) and the

Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 LT.S.C. §351 et seep) (RUIA).

IMRL (B.A. No. 5623) has been an employer under the Acts, with

service creditable from January 30, 1997.

In Surface Transportation Board (STB) Finance Docket 34177, decided

June 11, 2002, Iowa, Chicago & Eastern Railroad Corporation (ICE)

filed a notice of exemption to acquire and operate the following rail lines

and assets owned by IMRL. a Class II carrier: (1) IMRL’s existing rail

lines, which extend approximately 1,125 miles between Chicago,

Illinois, Kansas City, Missouri, and Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota,

and across Northern Iowa and Southern Minnesota; (2) approximately

275 miles of IMRL’s incidental trackage rights over lines of other

carriers; (3) IMRL’s ownership and operational interests in the Kansas

City Terminal Railway Company; (4) IMRL’s ownership and operational

interests in the so-called “Joint Agency” in Kansas City (jointly owned

with The Kansas City Southern Railway Company); and (5) IMRL’s

interests in jointly owned and/or operated industry trackage in various

locations, including South Beloit, Illinois, Janesville, Wisconsin, and

Clinton, Iowa.

Information regarding IMRL was furnished by Mr. David R. Koerner,

Controller for IMRL. According to Mr. Koerner, IMRL sold all of its

assets to ICE on July 29, 2002. Mr. Koerner stated that on the date of

the transaction, most of IMRL’s employees took positions with the ICE.

Mr. Koerner stated that union employees that were not offered

positions with the new railroad were terminated at the close of business

on July 29, 2002. According to Mr. Koerner. management employees

that were not offered positions in the new company were phased out

between the sale date and November 1, 2002. Mr. Koerner indicated the

last two employees of IMRL would be terminated by October 31, 2002.

BA#5623
I & M Rail Link. LLC (IMRL)

Section 202.11 of the Board’s regulations provides that:

The employer status of any company or person shall

terminate whenever such company or person loses any of the

characteristics essential to the existence of an employer

status. (20CFR 202.il.)

The record in this case indicates that I & M Rail Link. LLC lost the

characteristics essential to the existence of its employer status and

ceased being a covered rail carrier employer effective October 31, 2002,

the last day of the last month in which IMRL had employees.

V. M. Speakman, Jr.
No. IV-09-026 

Contact: Victor Dricks 

Phone: (817) 860-8128 

 

 July 20, 2009 

 E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

NRC CONDUCTING SPECIAL INSPECTION AT WATERFORD 3 NUCLEAR PLANT 

 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is conducting a special inspection at the 

Waterford 3 nuclear plant in response to problems discovered with an electrical relay in a plant 

safety system during testing. The plant, about 25 miles west of New Orleans, La., is operated by 

Entergy Operations. 

 Operators encountered problems starting a high pressure safety injection pump during 

testing on June 22. They traced the problem to a faulty electrical relay, replaced it and were 

subsequently able to start the pump satisfactorily. The pump is used to supply cooling water to 

the plant’s reactor core during some accident conditions. 

 There have been six prior failures of similar electrical relays at Waterford in the past year. 

“We want to thoroughly understand the failure and its significance because of the repeat 

nature of the problem and the importance of this piece of equipment in protecting plant safety,” 

said Region IV Administrator Elmo E. Collins. 

 A two-person team of NRC inspectors will review the circumstances related to the 

problem, the licensee’s root cause evaluation and the effect it had on the availability and 

reliability of plant safety systems. 

 The inspection will begin today and is expected to take several days. The team will write 

a report about 30-45 days after completion of the inspection. The report will be available on the 

agency’s online document library at: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html. 

 ### 

 

 NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125 

Telephone: (817) 860-8128
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Kramont Realty Trust (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Louis P. Meshon,
Sr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                  /s/ Louis P. Meshon, Sr.
                                  -----------------------
                                  Louis P. Meshon, Sr.
                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                  Kramont Realty Trust
                                  March 8, 2005

                                       82
### §1920. National Service Life Insurance Fund

(a) The National Service Life Insurance Fund heretofore created in the Treasury is continued as a permanent trust fund. Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, all premiums paid on account of National Service Life Insurance shall be deposited and covered into the Treasury to the credit of such fund, which, together with interest earned thereon, shall be available for the payment of liabilities under such insurance, including payment of dividends and refunds of unearned premiums, and for the reimbursement of administrative costs under subsection (c). Payments from this fund shall be made upon and in accordance with awards by the Secretary.

(b) The Secretary is authorized to set aside out of such fund such reserve amounts as may be required under accepted actuarial principles to meet all liabilities under such insurance; and the Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to invest and reinvest such fund, or any part thereof, in interest-bearing obligations of the United States or in obligations guaranteed as to principal and interest by the United States, and to sell such obligations for the purposes of such fund.

(c)(1) For each fiscal year for which this subsection is in effect, the Secretary shall, from the National Service Life Insurance Fund, reimburse the "General operating expenses" account of the Department for the amount of administrative costs determined under paragraph (2) for that fiscal year. Such reimbursement shall be made from any surplus earnings for that fiscal year that are available for dividends on such insurance after claims have been paid and actuarially determined reserves have been set aside. However, if the amount of such administrative costs exceeds the amount of such surplus earnings, such reimbursement shall be made only to the extent of such surplus earnings.

(2) The Secretary shall determine the administrative costs to the Department for a fiscal year for which this subsection is in effect which, in the judgment of the Secretary, are properly allocable to the provision of National Service Life Insurance (and to the provision of any total disability income insurance added to the provision of such insurance).

(3) This subsection shall be in effect only with respect to fiscal year 1996.

(Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1154, §720; renumbered §1920 and amended Pub. L. 102–83, §§4(b)(1), (2)(E), 5(a), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 404–406; Pub. L. 104–99, title II, §201(b), Jan. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 36.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Amendment by Pub. L. 104–99 is based on section 107(1) of H.R. 2099, One Hundred Fourth Congress, as passed by the House of Representatives on Dec. 7, 1995, which was enacted into law by Pub. L. 104–99.

#### Amendments

1996—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–99 inserted ", and for the reimbursement of administrative costs under subsection (c)" after "unearned premiums".

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 104–99 added subsec. (c).

1991—Pub. L. 102–83 renumbered section 720 of this title as this section and substituted "Secretary" for "Administrator" in two places.
§ 1180.7 Exceptions. ( a ) An agency shall not be required to take any further action to submit a copy of a final STEI product to NTIS or one of its affiliates if— ( 1 ) It has designated NTIS to receive a single copy of each STEI product once it has been produced, has made the arrangements specified in § 1180.6, if appropriate, and has made arrangements to receive appropriate certification from a contractor, grantee or other external performer of federally funded research that a copy has been sent to NTIS or one of its affiliates within the appropriate time period pursuant to obligations incurred in the applicable funding agreement (see Appendix to this part) or pursuant to such other system as the agency has established to ensure timely transfer;
( 2 ) The agency and the Director have executed an appropriate agreement or memorandum of understanding establishing an alternative system for compliance; or
( 3 ) The federally funded STEI is protected by copyright for which no license has been reserved to the Government that would allow distribution by NTIS;
( 4 ) The product is an agency generated article that is published in a privately produced journal; or
( 5 ) The agency and the Director, pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section, have agreed that the transfer of a product otherwise covered by these regulations would not be appropriate.
( b ) An agency and the Director shall be deemed to be in agreement within the meaning of paragraph (a)(3) of this section if the Director has not objected within 30 days to an agency's written notification of its determination that timely transfer of a product or category of products would not be appropriate under section 108 of the American Technology Preeminence Act. Examples of inappropriate transfers include: ( 1 ) Transfers that could cause significant harm to an agency's existing dissemination program that is operating on a cost recovery basis, is operating in compliance with the policies described by OMB Circular A-130, and for which special arrangements that would permit supplemental distribution by NTIS cannot be negotiated.
( 2 ) Federally funded STEI that has received, or is likely to receive, widespread distribution to most potential users at no charge.
### **CHAPTER 35—NON-FEDERAL PUBLIC WORKS**

Sec.
3501.
Definitions.
3502.
Planned public works.
3503.
Revolving fund.
3504.
Surveys of public works planning.
3505.
Forgiveness of outstanding advances.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 26, 2009

p1019 

# Order

October 26, 2009

139420

GEORGE MITCHELL, Plaintiff,

v SC: 139420 AGC: 1364/04 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On the order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.
§ 880.206 Date of death. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, for the purpose of benefits administered by OPM, the date of death of a missing annuitant who has been determined to be dead by an authorized institution is the date of disappearance as determined by the Associate Director.
( b ) For the purpose of determining whether a claim is untimely under any statute of limitations applicable to CSRS, FERS or FEGLI benefits (section 8345(i)(2), section 8466(b), or section 8705(b) through (d) of title 5, United States Code), the time between the date of disappearance and the date on which the authorized institution issues its decision that the missing annuitant is dead is excluded.
Aaron Stein

Certified Public Accountant

PO Box 406

981 Allen Lane

Woodmere, NY 11598

516-569-0520

August 10, 2001

Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, DC 20549

RE:        Green Dolphin Systems Corporation

Filing of Form 10SBA12G

To Whom it May Concern:

The attached disclosure related to the change of principal accountants  for Green Dolphin
Systems Corporation, which was forwarded to me for review by  James N. Barber, Attorney for
Green Dolphin, is correct and accurate in all  respects.  I have nothing to add to the disclosures.

Very truly yours;

/s/ Aaron Stein

Aaron Stein
#### § 847.808 Is money in the NAFI retirement fund covering NAFI service that an employee elects to use for immediate retirement under CSRS or FERS, transferred to the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund?

Money in the NAFI retirement fund covering NAFI service that an employee elects to use for immediate retirement under CSRS or FERS under this subpart cannot be transferred to the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund.