alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, John R. Cooper,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of AvocentCorporation on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2006 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents inall material respects the financial condition and results of operations ofAvocent Corporation.
| Date: March 1, 2007 |   |                           |
|--------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|
|                     |   |                           |
|                     |   |                           |
|                     |   | By:/s/ John R. Cooper          |   |
|                     |   | Name: John R. Cooper           |
|                     |   | Title: Chief Executive Officer |

 

I, Edward H.Blankenship, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report ofAvocent Corporation on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2006fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition andresults of operations of Avocent Corporation.
| Date: March 1, 2007 |   |                                                                                       |
|--------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |   |                                                                                       |
|                     |   |                                                                                       |
|                     |   | By:/s/ Edward H. Blankenship                                                               |   |
|                     |   | Name: Edward H. Blankenship                                                                |
|                     |   | Title: Senior Vice President of Finance, Chief  Financial Officer, and Assistant Secretary |

 

----
§ 894.303 What happens to my enrollment if I transfer to an excluded position? ( a ) If you have FEDVIP coverage and you transfer to a position excluded under § 894.302(a) through (d), your enrollment stops.
( b ) If you have FEDVIP coverage and you transfer to a position excluded under § 894.302(e) through (j) with no break in service of more than 3 days, your enrollment is not affected. If you have a break in service of more than 3 days, your enrollment stops.
( c ) If you did not elect to enroll in FEDVIP and then transfer to an excluded position, you lose all rights to enroll at that time.
Exhibit
32.3




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Anthony J. Branca, Chief Financial Officer of ICON Capital Corp., the Manager of
the Registrant, in connection with the Quarterly Report of ICON Income Fund Ten,
LLC (the “LLC”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Quarterly Report”) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the LLC.




Date: November
12, 2009





/s/Anthony J.
Branca__


Anthony
J. Branca


Chief
Financial Officer


ICON
Capital Corp.


Manager
of ICON Income Fund Ten, LLC
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert W. Thomas, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report of FoxHollow Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of FoxHollow Technologies, Inc.



|                   |  |     |  |                                                                                               
|------------------ |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 13, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Robert W. Thomas                                                                          
|                   |  |     |  | Robert W. Thomas President, Chief Executive
Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)



I, Matthew B. Ferguson, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of FoxHollow Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of FoxHollow
Technologies, Inc.



|                   |  |     |  |                                                                                         
|------------------ |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 13, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Matthew B. Ferguson                                                                 
|                   |  |     |  | Matthew B. Ferguson Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

April 29, 2013

N o. 04

- 12

- 00727

- CV

Enjoli WYNN

, Appellant

v.

SILVER OA KS APARTMENTS, LTD

. , Appellee

From the County Court At Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 380959

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant’s third motion for extension of time is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is

due on April 29, 2013 . No further extensions will be granted absent extenuating circumstances

.

___________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 29th day of April, 2013

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 21 (Thursday, January 31, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00229]



[[Page 731]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

[CDC-2018-0085, Docket Number NIOSH-319]


Partnership Opportunity To Identify Products for Fentanyl 
Exposure in Personal Protective Equipment Information Database; 
Reopening of the Comment Period

AGENCY: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) 
of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of 
Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice and reopening of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On October 18, 2018 the National Institute for Occupational 
Safety and Health (NIOSH) of the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC), published a notice in the Federal Register [83 FR 
52834] announcing the availability of a Partnership Opportunity to 
Identify Products for Fentanyl Exposure in Personal Protective 
Equipment Information Database. Written comments were to be received by 
November 19, 2018. In response to requests from interested parties, 
NIOSH is announcing the reopening of the comment period.

DATES: Electronic or written comments must be received by April 1, 
2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a5d5d5c0c6cacbc6c0d7cbd6e5c6c1c68bc2cad3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c6b6b6a3a5a9a8a5a3b4a8b586a5a2a5e8a1a9b0">[email protected]</span></a>, NIOSH, National 
Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, Office of the Director, 626 
Cochrans Mill Road, Pittsburgh PA 15236, 1-888-654-2294 (a toll free 
number).

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by CDC-2018-0085 and 
Docket Number NIOSH-319, by either of the following two methods:
    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    <bullet> Mail: National Institute for Occupational Safety and 
Health, NIOSH Docket Office, 1090 Tusculum Avenue, MS C-34, Cincinnati, 
Ohio 45226-1998.

    Dated: January 23, 2019.
Frank J. Hearl,
Chief of Staff, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2019-00229 Filed 1-30-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4163-19-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 31.2

                                CERTIFICATION
          Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, Brent Petterson, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of New Pacific
    Ventures, Inc.

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
    statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
    make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
    statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
    this quarterly report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
    information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
    material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
    cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
    this quarterly report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
    establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
    in Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
    amended) for the registrant and have:

    a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
    information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
    particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
    prepared;

    b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
    procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
    quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

    c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
    effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
    evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
    our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
    committee of the registrant's board of directors:

    a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
    controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
    process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
    registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

    b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
    employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
    and

6.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
    quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
    controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
    controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
    corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
    weaknesses.

Dated: September 10, 2004

/s/Brent Petterson
----------------
Brent Petterson
Secretary/Treasurer/Director
§ 270.201 Priority of investigation. ( a ) *General.* Except as provided in this section, a Team investigation will have priority over any other investigation of any other Federal agency.
( b ) *Criminal acts.* ( 1 ) If the Attorney General, in consultation with the Director, determines, and notifies the Director that circumstances reasonably indicate that the building failure being investigated by a Team may have been caused by a criminal act, the Team will relinquish investigative priority to the appropriate law enforcement agency.
( 2 ) If a criminal investigation of the building failure being investigated by a Team is initiated at the state or local level, the Team will relinquish investigative priority to the appropriate law enforcement agency.
( 3 ) The relinquishment of investigative priority by the Team will not otherwise affect the authority of the Team to continue its investigation under the Act.
( c ) *National Transportation Safety Board.* If the National Transportation Safety Board is conducting an investigation related to an investigation of a Team, the National Transportation Safety Board investigation will have priority over the Team investigation. Such priority will not otherwise affect the authority of the Team to continue its investigation under the Act.
( d ) Although NIST will share any evidence of criminal activity that it obtains in the course of an investigation under the Act with the appropriate law enforcement agency, NIST will not participate in the investigation of any potential criminal activity.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is

not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-10744 (Summary Calendar)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RAMAIHAN MAKAYU, also known as Makayu Ramaihan, Defendant-Appellant.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:94-CR-54-1

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ July 3, 1996

Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM: *

Court-appointed counsel for Ramaihan Makayu filed a motion to withdraw and brief pursuant

to Anders v. California

, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Makayu filed a response, a motion for appointment

of counsel

o n appeal, and a motion for continuance to file an appellate brief. Our review of the

record discloses that the issues raised by counsel do not give rise to an issue of arg uable merit.

Makayu’s contention that he was denied his constitutional right barring double

jeopardy cannot be determined from the record. Because the record does not contain documentation

of the forfeiture proceeding, this court cannot determine whether jeopardy attached in the previous

forfeiture proceeding, see United States v. Halper

, 490 U.S. 435, 448-49 (1989); United States v.

Arreola-Ramos

, 60 F.3d 188, 192 (5th Cir. 1995), or whether Makayu waived his Fifth Amendmentrigh t by entering a guilty plea. S ee Taylor v. Whitley

, 933 F.2d 325, 327 (5th Cir. 1991), cert.

denied

, 503 U.S. 988 (1992). Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED as frivolous.

Because counsel’s Anders motion is granted, Makayu’s motion for appointment of counsel

on appeal and motion for continuance to file an appellate brief are DENIED as moot.
§ 842.909 Review of decisions. The following decisions may be appealed to the Merit Systems Protection Board under procedures prescribed by the Board: ( a ) The final decision of the Department of Energy issued to an employee, former employee, or survivor as the result of a request for determination filed under § 842.906; and
( b ) The final decision of the Department of Energy that a break in service referred to in § 842.904(a)(2) did not begin with an involuntary separation within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 8414(b)(1)(A).
LICENSING BOARD TO HEAR ORAL ARGUMENTS FEB. 21 IN NORRISTOWN, PA.,

ON LIMERICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION

An Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB) panel will hear oral arguments on 

Tuesday, Feb. 21, on a request for a hearing on the Limerick nuclear power plant’s license 

renewal application. The session will begin at 9 a.m. at the Montgomery County Courthouse, 2 

East Airy St., Norristown, Pa.

 The ASLB is the independent body within the NRC that presides over hearings in which 

the public can challenge NRC proposed licensing and enforcement actions.

The session will be open for public observation, but participation will be limited to 

representatives of the parties taking part in the proceeding, including the National Resources 

Defense Council (NRDC); Exelon Generation Co., LLC, which owns and operates the plant; and 

NRC staff. Early arrival is suggested to allow for security screening for all members of the 

public interested in attending. NRC policy prohibits signs, banners, posters or displays in the 

hearing room.

 Limerick, which is the site of two boiling-water reactors, is located in Limerick 

(Montgomery County), Pa. Exelon submitted an application on June 22, 2011, seeking 20-year 

license extensions for both units. The current operating licenses for Limerick Units 1 and 2 

expire on Oct. 26, 2024, and June 22, 2029, respectively.

On Nov. 22, 2011, NRDC filed a request for a hearing on the application. The 

organization submitted four contentions related to the environmental report prepared by Exelon 

as part of its application, including the absence of a Severe Accident Mitigation Analysis. The 

ASLB judges will ask questions of the parties on Feb. 21 as they consider the admissibility of the 

contentions. 

Documents related to the Limerick license renewal application are available on the 

NRC’s website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region I 

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov 

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. I-12-004

Contact: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330

 Neil Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

Feb. 2, 2012

Email: opa1.resource@nrc.gov
Documents pertaining to the ASLB proceedings are available in the agency’s electronic 

hearing docket.

More information about the ASLB can be found on NRC’s website.

#

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL 

UPDATES link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when 

news releases are posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on 

www.twitter.com/NRCgov.
NRC FINAL RULE CHANGES DEFINITION OF CONSTRUCTION 

FOR MATERIALS APPLICANTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has amended its regulations for nuclear materials 

licenses to change the meaning of “construction” and “commencement of construction” and 

allow applicants for some materials licenses to conduct certain site-preparation activities before a 

license is issued.

The changes apply to the licensing and approval processes for byproduct, source and 

special nuclear material licenses and irradiators. They make the definition of “construction” and 

“commencement of construction” consistent with NRC regulations for nuclear power plant 

applicants and licensees as amended in 2007. Previously, applicants for uranium recovery, fuel 

cycle facilities and other materials facilities had to apply for exemptions to conduct site 

preparation activities similar to those that power plant applicants are allowed to perform.

The final rule does not include a “limited work authorization” provision similar to that in 

NRC regulations for nuclear power plants. 

The changes were included in a final rule published today in the Federal Register. The 

changes become effective Nov. 14. A proposed rule was published July 27, 2010, for public 

comment.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-174 September 15, 2011
June 29, 2011 

CLOSED MEETING NOTICE 

LICENSEE: International Isotopes, Inc. 

DOCKET NO.: 40-9086 

DATE AND TIME: July 1, 2011 

10:30 A.M. – 12:30 P.M. 

LOCATION: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) 

 Executive Boulevard Building 

 Room E-2-B18 

 6003 Executive Boulevard 

 Rockville, MD 20852 

PURPOSE: To discuss human factors requirements (ISA related) for International 

Isotope Inc. application for a fluorine extraction and depleted uranium 

deconversion process facility. 

PARTICIPANTS: NRC International Isotopes

 Sean Peters, RES John Miller 

 Julie Marble, RES Jim Thomas 

 Tom Hiltz, NMSS et. al. 

 Dennis Morey, NMSS 

 Matt Bartlett, NMSS 

 Maria Guardiola, NMSS 

 et. al. 

CONTACT: Matt Bartlett, NMSS/FCSS/CDEB 

 (301) 492-3119 

matthew.bartlett@nrc.gov

ENCLOSURE: Meeting Agenda 

 

NOTES: 

(1) The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Policy Statement “Enhanced Public Participation in 

NRC Meetings,” May 28, 2002, applies to this meeting. The Policy Statement may be found on 

the NRC Web site, www.nrc.gov, and contains information regarding visitors and security. 

(2) This meeting is closed to the public in order to discuss sensitive information (official use 

only) not subject to public disclosure pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 

Section 2.390. 

cc: John Miller, International Isotopes 
CLOSED MEETING NOTICE 

cc: John Miller, International Isotopes 

DISTIRUBTION:

FCSS r/f JMarble 

ML111801263 

OFC FCSS/AFCB FCSS/ AFCB FCSS/ AFCB 

NAME MBartlett LAllen DMorey 

DATE 06/29/11 06/29/11 06/29/11 

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
MEETING AGENDA 

(CLOSED)

Meeting with Representatives of 

International Isotopes, Inc. 

July 1, 2011 

10:30 A.M. – 12:30 A.M. 

Discuss the human factors review. 

Time Topic 

10:30 a.m. ISA – Discuss compliance with 70.61 for natural phenomena events and 

the use of sole IROFS 

11:30 a.m. Human Factors – Discuss the level of information needed in the HFEPlan, the use of industry standards, and the potential for a license 

condition 

12:30 p.m. Meeting Adjourn 

Enclosure