alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 13.2

|Certification of Chief Financial Officer
      pursuant to              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to
|Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002                     

I, Susanne Robertson, Chief Financial Officer*
  of Teryl Resources Corp., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Annual Report on Form 20-F of Teryl Resources
  Corp. for the year ended May 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly
  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
  of Teryl Resources Corp.

|Richmond, BC Canada |     |                            
|------------------- | --- | ---------------------------
|                    | by: | /s/
      Susanne Robertson
|July 31, 2007       |     |                            
|                    |     | Susanne Robertson          
|                    |     | Chief Financial Officer*   
|                    |     | (*as of May 31, 2002)      

A signed original of this written statement required
  by Section 906 has been provided to Teryl Resources Corp. and will be retained
  by Teryl Resources Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
  or its staff upon request.

---
### [§§3772 to 3775. Renumbered §§2051 to 2054]
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-02-00049-CV

ACandS, Inc., Appellant

v.

Dorothy A. Lehmann, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Heirs and Estate of 

Clarence R. Lehmann, Deceased; Alan Sweeten; Eugene Kanak; James Jones;

James Scott; and Henry Taylor, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY, 20TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 26,342-A, HONORABLE EDWARD P. MAGRE, JUDGE PRESIDING

The parties have filed an amended joint motion to dismiss and an amended joint motion to 

expedite the issuance of mandate. We dismiss the joint motion to dismiss and the joint motion to expedite, 

we grant the amended joint motion to dismiss, and we grant the amended joint motion to expedite the 

issuance of mandate.

__________________________________________

Marilyn Aboussie, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Yeakel

Dismissed on Joint Motion

Filed: April 25, 2002
Do Not Publish
#### In the Matter of William Ehrlich.

Respondent disbarred. Order to be settled on notice. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
§ 25.20 Disclosure of documents. ( a ) Upon written request to the reviewing official, the respondent may review any relevant and material documents, transcripts, records, and other materials that related to the allegations set out in the complaint and upon which the findings and conclusions of the investigating official under § 25.4(b) are based, unless such documents are subject to a privilege under Federal law. Upon payment of fees for duplication, the respondent may obtain copies of such documents.
( b ) Upon written request to the reviewing official, the respondent also may obtain a copy of all exculpatory information in the possession of the reviewing official or investigating official relating to the allegations in the complaint, even if it is contained in a document that would otherwise be privileged. If the document would otherwise be privileged, only that portion containing exculpatory information must be disclosed.
( c ) The notice sent to the Attorney General from the reviewing official as described in § 25.5 is not discoverable under any circumstances.
( d ) The respondents may file a motion to compel dosclosure of the documents subject to the provisions of this section. Such a motion may only be filed with the ALJ following the filing of an answer pursuant to § 25.9.
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


WOIZE
INTERNATIONAL LTD.


FORM
10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2006


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






I am the
Chief Financial Officer of Woize International Ltd., a Nevada corporation (the
"Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Form 10-Q of
the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 and filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission ("Form 10-Q").




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in the Form 10-QB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date:
      August 19, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Martin
      ThorpMartin
      Thorp
              Chief
      Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Joseph Pierce, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 59636;

First District (5th Division)

July 26, 1974.

James J. Doherty, Public Defender, of Chicago (Richard D. Kharas, Assistant Public Defender, of counsel), for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

*771Bernard Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago (Patrick T. Driscoll, Jr., Barry Rand Elden, and Michael A. Tyrrell, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel), for the People.
§ 919.515 What specific information is in the EPLS? ( a ) At a minimum, the *EPLS* indicates— ( 1 ) The full name (where available) and address of each excluded or disqualified person, in alphabetical order, with cross references if more than one name is involved in a single action;
( 2 ) The type of action;
( 3 ) The cause for the action;
( 4 ) The scope of the action;
( 5 ) Any termination date for the action;
( 6 ) The agency and name and telephone number of the agency point of contact for the action; and
( 7 ) The Dun and Bradstreet Number (DUNS), or other similar code approved by the GSA, of the excluded or disqualified person, if available.
( b ) ( 1 ) The database for the *EPLS* includes a field for the Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) (the social security number (SSN) for an individual) of an excluded or disqualified person.
( 2 ) Agencies disclose the SSN of an individual to verify the identity of an individual, only if permitted under the Privacy Act of 1974 and, if appropriate, the Computer Matching and Privacy Protection Act of 1988, as codified in 5 U.S.C. 552(a).
§ 280.213 Prehearing conference. ( a ) The administrative law judge, on his or her own motion or on request of a party, may direct the parties to participate in a prehearing conference, either in person or by telephone, to consider: ( 1 ) Simplification of issues;
( 2 ) The necessity or desirability of amendments to pleadings;
( 3 ) Obtaining stipulations of fact and of documents to avoid unnecessary proof; or
( 4 ) Such other matters as may expedite the disposition of the proceedings.
( b ) The administrative law judge may order the conference proceedings to be recorded electronically or taken by a reporter, transcribed and filed with the ALJ.
( c ) If a prehearing conference is impracticable, the administrative law judge may direct the parties to correspond with the ALJ to achieve the purposes of such a conference.
( d ) The administrative law judge will prepare a summary of any actions agreed on or taken pursuant to this section. The summary will include any written stipulations or agreements made by the parties.
### §30307. Restrictions

(a) Stock and Dividends.—The corporation may not issue stock or declare or pay a dividend.

(b) Political Activities.—The corporation or a director or officer as such may not contribute to, support, or assist a political party or candidate for elective public office.

(c) Distribution of Income or Assets.—The income or assets of the corporation may not inure to the benefit of, or be distributed to, a director, officer, or member as such during the life of the corporation or on its dissolution or final liquidation. This section does not prevent the payment of—

(1) bona fide expenses of officers of the corporation in amounts approved by the board of directors; or

(2) appropriate aid to blinded veterans or their widows or children in carrying out the purposes of the corporation.

(d) Loans.—The corporation may not make a loan to a director, officer, or employee. Directors and officers who vote for or assent to making a loan to a director, officer, or employee, and officers who participate in making the loan, are jointly and severally liable to the corporation for the amount of the loan until it is repaid.

(e) Immunity From Liability.—Members and private individuals are not liable for the obligations of the corporation.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1318.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 30307(a) | 36:862. | Aug. 27, 1958, Pub. L. 85–769, §§3(4) (words between 1st comma and semicolon), 9, 10, 12, 72 Stat. 924, 926. |
| 30307(b) | 36:860. | |
| 30307(c) | 36:853(4) (words between 1st comma and semicolon). | |
| | 36:859(a) (1st sentence words before last comma, last sentence). | |
| 30307(d) | 36:859(b). | |
| 30307(e) | 36:859(a) (1st sentence words after last comma). | |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "any shares of" are omitted as unnecessary.

In subsection (c), the words "inure to the benefit of" are substituted for "inure to" for consistency in the revised title. The text of 36:853(4) (words between 1st comma and semicolon) is omitted as unnecessary.
#### § 894.807 Can an active duty member enroll or be covered under a FEDVIP vision plan?

No, a uniformed services member on active duty is not a *TEI-V* and may not enroll or be covered under a FEDVIP vision plan. However, an active duty member is a sponsor, therefore their *TEI family members* may be eligible to enroll in a vision plan. *See* definition of *TEI* for FEDVIP vision benefits (*TEI-V*) in § 894.101.
No. II-11-017 April 1, 2011

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416

NRC SCHEDULES MEETING TO DISCUSS 2010 PERFORMANCE 

OF HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a meeting for Thursday, 

April 14, with representatives of Progress Energy to discuss the agency’s assessment of safety 

performance during 2010 at the Harris nuclear power plant. The plant, operated by Progress, is

located near New Hill, N.C., about 20 miles southwest of Raleigh.

The meeting, which is open to the public, is scheduled to begin with an open house and 

poster session at 5 p.m. EDT at the Holly Springs Cultural Center, 300 West Ballentine Street in 

Holly Springs. At 7 p.m., the NRC staff will make a presentation and then be available to answer 

questions on the safety performance of the Harris plant, as well as the agency’s role in ensuring 

safe plant operation. 

“The NRC evaluates all nuclear plants in a systematic and detailed way every year,” 

NRC Region II Administrator Victor McCree said. “Our oversight and inspections at Harris 

ensure the plant is operated in a way that protects people and the environment.”

A letter sent from the NRC Region II office to plant officials addresses the performance 

of the plant during 2010 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on 

the NRC web site at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/har_2010q4.pdf.

The NRC found that the Harris plant’s 2010 performance met all of the agency’s safety 

objectives and was at a level that results in no additional NRC oversight. This year, the NRC

plans to conduct the very detailed inspections required at those plants that are operating well. 

All the inspection findings and performance indicators at the Harris plant during the most 

recent quarter had very low safety significance and were classified as “green.”

 The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess plant 

performance. The colors start with “green,” which has very low safety significance, to “white,” 

“yellow” or “red,” based on the significance of the issues. Inspection findings and performance 

indicators are updated on the NRC’s web site (www.nrc.gov) each quarter. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov
Current performance information for the Harris plant is available on the NRC web site 

at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/HAR1/har1_chart.html. 

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 23, 2012

t0416 

# Order

April 23, 2012

143997

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143997 COA: 304703 St. Clair CC: 05-000220-FH TERRY LEE CEASOR, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 4, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
From: <james.tamm@dot.gov>

To: <Chandana_L._Achanta@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: William Charmley/AA/USEPA/US@EPA, Robin Moran/AA/USEPA/US@EPA, <rebecca.yoon@dot.gov>, <Steve.Wood@dot.gov>

Date: 09/29/2010 06:44 PM

Subject: RE: Light duty NOI Ch 7.1.3 Impacts on the U.S. Economy



### Chandana,

EPA and NHTSA have agreed to drop Ch 7.1.3 Impacts on the U.S. Economy.

Jim
### §1914. Statutory total disabilities

Without prejudice to any other cause of disability, the permanent loss of the use of both feet, of both hands, or of both eyes, or of one foot and one hand, or of one foot and one eye, or of one hand and one eye, or the total loss of hearing of both ears, or the organic loss of speech, shall be deemed total disability for insurance purposes.

(Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1151, §714; renumbered §1914, Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 406.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–83 renumbered section 714 of this title as this section.
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVA NIA**  **WESTERN DISTRICT**

CENTRAL WE STMORELAND CAREER AND TECHNOLOGY CENTER EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, PSEA/NEA, COLLEEN CONKO, SABINE LYNN, DANIEL LUSK, MATTHEW MORRELL, AND JAMES MARK SCHOMING

v.

PENN

-TRAFFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT

PETITION OF: CENTRAL WE STMORELAND CAREER AND TECHNOLOGY CENTER EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, PSEA/NEA, COLLEEN CONKO, SABINE LYNN, AND DANIEL LUSK : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 15 WAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court

**ORDER**

**PER CURIA M** 
**AN D**  **NOW**, this 20th day of May, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is **GRA NTED**  . The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Wh ether the Commonwealth Court erred in affirming the trial court's decision granting summary judgment in favor of the school district and denying summary judgment in favor of the furloughed teachers with respect to the teachers ’ claim under subsection (b.1) of the Transfer of Entities Act, 24 P.S. § 11

- 1113 et seq. , where the Commonwealth Court's conclusion that the furloughed teachers had no future reemployment rights under the Act effectively renders subsection (b.1), added through legislative amendment in 1991, to be meaningless and inconsistent with the School Code read in pari materia[?]
NRC ANNOUNCES OPPORTUNITY TO REQUEST HEARING ON LICENSE 

RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT 

 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission today announced the opportunity to request a hearing 

on an application to renew the operating license for the Crystal River Unit 3 Nuclear Generating 

Plant for an additional 20 years.

 Crystal River Unit 3 is a pressurized-water reactor located 35 miles southwest of Ocala, Fl. 

The plant owner, Florida Power Corporation, submitted the renewal application Dec. 16, 2008. 

The current operating license for Crystal River expires Dec. 03, 2016. 

 The NRC staff has determined that the application contains sufficient information for the 

agency to formally “docket,” or file, the application and begin its safety and environmental 

reviews. Docketing the application does not preclude requesting additional information as the 

reviews proceed, nor does it indicate whether the Commission will renew the license. 

 A notice of opportunity to request a hearing has been published in the Federal Register, 

and the deadline for requesting a hearing is May 8, 2009. Petitions may be filed by anyone whose 

interest may be affected by the license renewal and who wishes to participate as a party in the 

proceeding. A request for a hearing and a petition for leave to intervene must be filed through the 

NRC’s E-Filing system. 

 Anyone wishing to file should contact the Office of the Secretary by e-mail at 

HEARINGDOCKET@nrc.gov at least five days before the filing deadline to request a digital ID 

certificate and allow for the creation of an electronic docket. More information on the hearing 

process is available on the NRC Web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/aboutnrc/regulatory/adjudicatory/hearing.html. 

 The Crystal River renewal application is posted on the NRC Web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications/crystal-river.html. A 

schedule for reviewing the application will be posted soon. License renewal reviews typically take 

22 months with no hearing, or 30 months if a hearing is granted. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 09-043 March 9, 2009 
Information about the license renewal process can be found on the NRC Web site at 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal.html. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
Changes in Regulations for Excise Stamps for Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco Products inGeorgia

----

Decree from the Ministry of Finance of the Georgian State Tax Department
### §40105. Governing body

(a) Board of Directors.—The board of directors and the responsibilities of the board are as provided in the articles of incorporation.

(b) Officers.—The officers and the election of officers are as provided in the articles of incorporation.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1330.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 40105(a) | 36:2606. | Aug. 17, 1984, Pub. L. 98–382, §§6, 7, 98 Stat. 1344. |
| 40105(b) | 36:2607. | |

Section

The words "and in conformity with the laws of the State or States in which it is incorporated" in 36:2606 and "and in conformity with the laws of the State or States wherein it is incorporated" in 36:2607 are omitted as unnecessary.
KAZAKSTAN PRIVATIZES POWER GENERATION

----

by Kevin Lyons
**August 1997**
 U.S. and otherWestern companies are playing a major role in privatizing electric utilities inKazakstan.  During the past year, more than half of Kazakstan's generating capacity has been soldand Western companies are lining up to bid on the remaining state-owned power plants. Although there have been some problems, a pattern is being set for the eventual privatization ofthe country's regional power distribution companies and the national power transmission grid. While existing power plants will continue to rely on Russian-made parts for their Soviet-eraequipment, the market for Western equipment is likely to grow as existing facilities are renovatedand new plants are built.Photo: e-prime
The Kapan Region of Armenia

----
NRC CHAIRMAN GREGORY B. JACZKO REMARKS AT TODAY’S MEETING ABOUT 

PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PROPOSED EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS RULE CHANGES

Note: The Commissioners were briefed today by Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and Federal 

Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) staff on stakeholder participation and comments, and by 

stakeholders themselves, related to proposed changes to the agency’s emergency preparedness 

requirements. 

The Commission met today to hear comments and discuss the proposed changes to the emergency 

preparedness requirements for licensees. Today’s meeting reflected the Commission’s critical focus on 

ensuring the safety and security of our licensed facilities and the American public. Even as we work to 

prevent accidents and emergencies from arising in the first place, our safety mission requires us to prepare 

for unexpected challenges. 

The proposed regulations seek to ensure adequate and timely emergency response through several 

measures. These include provisions to prevent onsite emergency responders from being stretched too thin 

by the assignment of additional responsibilities, efforts to enhance the coordination between onsite 

personnel and local and state emergency responders, and other measures intended to strengthen the ability 

of licensees to effectively implement their emergency plans. 

We are fortunate that these efforts have been supported by an inclusive, collaborative, and 

transparent working relationship between the NRC and FEMA. The staffs of both the NRC and FEMA 

have worked effectively together to formulate these proposed regulations and accompanying guidance, 

drawing on their extensive experience and expertise. Their efforts have been aided by the comments of a 

broad range of stakeholders. 

I was pleased that our second panel featured a representative sample of the diverse and 

comprehensive comments we received from local and state governments, nongovernmental organizations, 

industry and researchers. The Commission will consider their views as it continues its work with FEMA 

and the NRC staff to ensure emergency preparedness at all of our licensed facilities. I trust that the 

rulemaking process will conclude in the open and collaborative manner that has characterized it to this 

point. Such transparency is critical to sound public policy. 

I look forward to working collaboratively with my Commission colleagues on these important 

issues. 

### 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 09-195 December 8, 2009
News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.