alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2I, GeorgeP. Scanlon certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Levitt Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d — 15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this reportis being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparationof financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter  (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: November 9, 2007
---

Addendum to the Loan Agreement dated May 4, 2006

Extension

LOAN AGREEMENT

between

Mr. Günter Thiemann Käthe-Kollwitz-Strasse 23 33428
Harsewinkel

- in the following referred to as
Lender -

and

EDI Exploration Drilling International GmbH, represented by
the Managing Director Christian Runge Goethestrasse 59, 45721 Haltern am
See

- in the following referred to as
Borrower -

The loan agreement, to which this addendum applies, is changed,
effective immediately, in Section 2 paragraphs 2 and 3 as follows:

**Section 2      
 Interest, term and repayment of loan**

| | 2. | The term shall be extended by approximately 7 months and
      ends on 31/12/2008.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 3. | The loan shall be repaid on 31/12/2008 into the Lenders
      account.           

All of the other provisions of the
agreement remain unchanged and valid.

Münster, May 2, 2008



|[Signature]     |  |                                                        
|--------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|                |  |                                                        
|Günter Thiemann |  | EDI Exploration Drilling International
      Rotthäuser
|- Lender -      |  | Managing Director, Christian Runge                     
|                |  | - Borrower -                                           

---
Kazakstan Drops Preinspections

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

_________________________________________ 

)

LUIS IVAN POBLETE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Case No. 17-mc-00158 (APM)

)

CHUNG HUILO, )

)

Defendant. )

_________________________________________ )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter comes before the court on review of Plaintiff Luis Ivan Poblete’s “Pleading in 

Chancery Equity.” Plaintiff proceeds pro se. The court dismisses the pleading sua sponte for 

failure to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint contain “a short 

and plain statement” of the basis for the court’s jurisdiction; “a short and plain statement” of the 

pleader’s claim, showing she or he is entitled to relief; and a demand for relief. See Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 8(a). The purpose of this minimum pleading standard is to give fair notice to the defendant of 

the claims being asserted, such that the defendant can prepare a responsive answer and adequate 

defense, as well as determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. Butler v. Cal. St. 

Disbursement Unit, 990 F. Supp. 2d 8, 9 (D.D.C. 2013). Pleadings filed by pro se litigants are 

held to less stringent standards than those filed by lawyers, but all litigants must comply with the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Moore v. Agency for Int’l Dev., 994 F.2d 874, 876 (D.C. 

Cir. 1993). 
2

The court has reviewed Plaintiff’s Complaint and, in a word, it is unintelligible. The 

Complaint is titled as being filed in both the federal district court and the federal bankruptcy court 

for the District of Columbia. At no point does Plaintiff identify Defendant Chung Huilo or make 

any allegations pertaining to Defendant. Plaintiff states only that he “ha[s] a CONFLICT with the 

rules of law” and seeks “equitable relief” in the form of “the extinguishment and the full accounting 

of the ledger record.” See Compl., ECF No. 1, at 7. These statements neither constitute a “short

and plain statement” of the court’s jurisdiction and material facts, nor convey the nature of the 

dispute. Therefore, as drafted, the Complaint fails to meet the standard set forth in Rule 8(a) and

must be dismissed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a).

An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.

_____________________________

Date: January 30, 2017 Amit P. Mehta

United States District Judge
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the FAA invites public comment on one currently approved public information collection which will be submitted to OMB for renewal.

# DATES:

Comments must be received on or before (January 18, 2005).

# ADDRESSES:

Comments may be mailed or delivered to the FAA at the following address: Ms. Judy Street, Room 612, Federal Aviation Administration, Standards and Information Division, APF-100, 800 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20591.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Judith D. Street at the above address, on (202) 267-9895, or by e-mail at:                         *Judy.Street@faa.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Therefore, the FAA solicits comments on the following current collection of information. Comments should evaluate the necessity of the collection, the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden, the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected, and possible ways to minimize the burden of the collection.

1. 2120-0570, Certificated Training Centers-Simulator Rule, Part 142. To determine regulatory compliance, there is a need for airmen to maintain records of certain training and recency of experience; there is a need for training centers to maintain records of students' training, employee qualification and training, and training program approvals. Information is used to determine compliance with airman certification and testing to ensure safety. The current estimated annual reporting burden is 6,822 hours.

Issued in Washington, DC, on November 8, 2004.

Judith D. Street,

FAA Information Collection Clearance Officer, APF-100.

[FR Doc. 04-25418  Filed 11-15-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Selling and Delivering Food Aid to the Russian Federation

----

**January 1999**
by Joan Morgan and Derek Nowek
In December, the United States and Russia reached an agreement to provide substantial U.S.food aid to Russia.   The U.S. food aid package is a combination of long-term concessional salesand humanitarian assistance to supply the Russian Federation with much needed agriculturalcommodities. The assistance package will include about 3 million tons of U.S. food commoditiesvalued at US$625 million, plus another US$260 million in transportation and distribution costs.  
The food aid will be provided through three U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) programs:the Public Law 480 (P.L. 480) Title I program, the Section 416 (b) program, and the Food forProgress program.  For U.S. agricultural exporters and freight carriers doing business in Russia,one immediate impact of the food relief effort is a short-term revival of the trade and cargoactivity that dropped significantly since the Russian economic crisis began last August.
**Concessional Sales**
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2326 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2326

To require the conveyance of certain Bureau of Land Management lands in 
      Nye County, Nevada, to Ponderosa Dairy in Amargosa, Nevada.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 4, 2003

 Mr. Gibbons introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the conveyance of certain Bureau of Land Management lands in 
      Nye County, Nevada, to Ponderosa Dairy in Amargosa, Nevada.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAND CONVEYANCE, PONDEROSA DAIRY, AMARGOSA, NEVADA.

    (a) Conveyance Required.--The Secretary of the Interior shall 
convey to Ponderosa Dairy in Amargosa, Nevada, all right, title, and 
interest of the United States in and to a parcel of real property that 
is administered by the Bureau of Land Management in Nye County, Nevada, 
consists of approximately 40 acres, and is more fully described as the 
NE \1/4\ , E \1/4\ SE \1/4\ , SW \1/4\ of section 15, township 17 
south, range 49 east, Mount Diablo meridian.
    (b) Consideration.--As consideration for the conveyance under 
subsection (a), the recipient shall pay to the Secretary an amount 
equal to the fair market value of the conveyed lands. The fair market 
value of the lands shall be determined by an appraisal that is 
acceptable to the Secretary and conforms to the Federal appraisal 
standards, as defined in the Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal 
Land Acquisitions developed by the Interagency Land Acquisition 
Conference.
    (c) Time for Conveyance.--The Secretary shall complete the 
conveyance under subsection (a) not later than 120 days after the date 
on which the recipient deposits sufficient funds with the Bureau of 
Land Management to cover survey work and direct transaction costs 
described in subsection (d).
    (d) Payment of Costs.--All direct transaction costs associated with 
the conveyance under subsection (a), including the costs of appraisal, 
title, and survey work, shall be paid by the recipient.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                  Page 13 of 24

                                                                  EXHIBIT 99(e)

                        KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 1999-B

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas        Key Bank USA, National Association
fka, Bankers Trust Company                  800 Superior Avenue, 4th Floor
60 Wall Street, 26th floor - MS NYC60-2606    Cleveland, Ohio 44114
New York, NY  10017                         ATTN: President, KER
Attn: Corporate Trust & Agency Group        Phone: (216) 828-4293
Structured Finance                          Fax:   (216) 828-9301
Phone: (212) 250-8522
Fax:   (212) 797-8606



Pursuant to Section 3.09 of the Indenture between KeyCorp Student Loan Trust
1999-B, as Issuer, and Bankers Trust Company, as Indenture Trustee, dated
September 1, 1999, the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) a review of the
activities of the Issuer from January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2003, and of
its performance under the Indenture has been made, and (ii) to the best of my
knowledge, based on such review, the Issuer has fulfilled all its obligations
under the Indenture throughout such period.

                                    KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 1999-B,
                                    as Issuer

                                    By:   JPMorgan Chase Bank, as successor
                                          in interest to Bank One, National
                                          Association not in its individual
                                          capacity but solely as Eligible
                                          Lender Trustee


                                    By:   /S/ JEFFREY L. KINNEY
                                       ------------------------------
Date: February 6, 2004              Name: Jeffrey L. Kinney
                                    Title: Attorney-in-Fact
### §2067. National Center on Homelessness Among Veterans

(a) In General.—(1) The Secretary shall establish and operate a center to carry out the functions described in subsection (b).

(2) The center established under paragraph (1) shall be known as the "National Center on Homelessness Among Veterans".

(3) To the degree practicable, the Secretary shall operate the center established under paragraph (1) independently of the other programs of the Department that address homelessness among veterans.

(b) Functions.—The functions described in this subsection are as follows:

(1) To carry out and promote research into the causes and contributing factors to veteran homelessness.

(2) To assess the effectiveness of programs of the Department to meet the needs of homeless veterans.

(3) To identify and disseminate best practices with regard to housing stabilization, income support, employment assistance, community partnerships, and such other matters as the Secretary considers appropriate with respect to addressing veteran homelessness.

(4) To integrate evidence-based and best practices, policies, and programs into programs of the Department for homeless veterans and veterans at risk of homelessness and to ensure that the staff of the Department and community partners can implement such practices, policies, and programs.

(5) To serve as a resource center for, and promote and seek to coordinate the exchange of information regarding, all research and training activities carried out by the Department and by other Federal and non-Federal entities with respect to veteran homelessness.

(Added Pub. L. 114–315, title VII, §713(a), Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1588.)
AGENCY SPOTLIGHT

----
1 Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-30275 Summary Calendar

JOHN HENRY MCCLINTOCK, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus BURL CAIN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CV-1678-A

- - - - - - - - - - September 23, 1997 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 1
John Henry McClintock, Louisiana inmate #97631, appeals the dismissal of his habeas petition based on procedural default. He
raised one claim in his federal petition, prosecutorial misconduct by failing to disclose victim and witnes s statements which could
have been used as impeachment evidence. S ee Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83, 86 (1963).

He argues that he demonstrated cause and prejudice for hisuntimely filing of his Brady claim in state court. He also asserts

that his case meets the narrow exception to the cause-and-prejudice
rule. However, McClintock did not raise the manifest-miscarriageof-justice exception in his objections to the magistrate judge’s
report.

We have carefully reviewed the arguments and th e appellate
record. For the reasons relied upon by the district court, through
its adoption of the magistrate judge’ s report, s ee McClintock v. Cain , No. 96-16 78 (W.D. La. Feb. 19, 1997), we conclude that the
district court did not err by dis missing the habeas petition because the claim is procedurally barred.

AFFIRMED.
NRC ASSIGNS NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR 

TO CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials recently selected Natasha

Childs as the resident inspector for Progress Energy’s Crystal River nuclear 

power plant, located near Crystal River, Fla., about 80 miles north of 

Tampa.

Childs joined the NRC in October 2008 as a Project Engineer in the 

Resident Inspector Development Program in the NRC’s Region II office in 

Atlanta. She successfully completed the Resident Inspector Qualification 

Program last year.

Prior to joining the NRC, Childs spent eight years working as a Design Engineer and System 

Engineer at the Palisades nuclear plant in Michigan and the Watts Bar nuclear plant in Tennessee.

Childs attended the University of Illinois in Champaign, where she received a Bachelor of 

Science Degree in Mechanical Engineering.

“Natasha Childs has the experience and commitment to carry out the NRC mission of 

protecting people and the environment, and to help ensure the safety of all activities at the Crystal 

River plant,” said NRC Region II Administrator Victor McCree.

At least two NRC resident inspectors are assigned to each U.S. commercial nuclear plant. 

They serve as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major 

work projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. Resident inspectors can serve at

one site for up to seven years. 

The Crystal River resident inspectors can be reached at 352-795-7677.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No: II-11-040

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416

 

 June 30, 2011

E-mail: OPA2.Resource@nrc.gov
STEPHEN G. BURNS NAMED NRC GENERAL COUNSEL 

 Stephen G. Burns has been named the new General Counsel of the 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission by Chairman Dale E. Klein in consultation 

with the Commission. Burns will succeed Karen D. Cyr, who is retiring May 

1, after serving in that position for nearly 15 years. 

 Burns has been the NRC’s Deputy General Counsel since 1998. He 

began his employment as an NRC attorney in 1978. Since joining the NRC, he 

has served in various positions, including Executive Assistant to Chairman 

Kenneth M. Carr, Director of the Office of Commission Appellate 

Adjudication, and Associate General Counsel. Burns received his J.D. degree with honors in 1978 

from the George Washington University, where he was an editor on the George Washington Law 

Review. He received his B.A. degree, magna cum laude, from Colgate University in Hamilton, 

New York, in 1975. 

 Burns received the NRC Distinguished Service Award in 2001 and the Presidential 

Meritorious Executive Rank Award in 1998 and 2008. His appointment becomes effective May 2. 

The Office of the General Counsel (OGC) is under the supervision of the General Counsel 

who reports to the Commission. It provides legal advice to the Commission and other agency 

officials on all aspects of the NRC’s regulatory and administrative functions and programs. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 09-065 April 8, 2009