alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §7432. Pay of Under Secretary for Health

(a) Base Pay.—The base pay of the Under Secretary for Health shall be the annual rate of basic pay for positions at Level III of the Executive Schedule under section 5314 of title 5.

(b) Market Pay.—(1) In the case of an Under Secretary for Health who is also a physician or dentist, in addition to the base pay specified in subsection (a) the Under Secretary for Health may also be paid the market pay element of pay of physicians and dentists under section 7431(c) of this title.

(2) The amount of market pay of the Under Secretary for Health under this subsection shall be established by the Secretary.

(3) In establishing the amount of market pay of the Under Secretary for Health under this subsection, the Secretary shall utilize an appropriate health care labor market selected by the Secretary for purposes of this subsection.

(c) Treatment of Pay.—Pay under this section shall be considered pay for all purposes, including retirement benefits under chapters 83 and 84 of title 5 and other benefits.

(Added Pub. L. 108–445, §3(b), Dec. 3, 2004, 118 Stat. 2640.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 7432, added Pub. L. 102–40, title I, §102, May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 189; amended Pub. L. 102–405, title III, §302(c)(1), Oct. 9, 1992, 106 Stat. 1984; Pub. L. 104–262, title III, §346, Oct. 9, 1996, 110 Stat. 3208, related to written agreements for special pay, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 108–445.
### §22303. Membership

(a) Eligibility.—Except as provided in this chapter, eligibility for membership in the corporation and the rights, privileges, and designation of classes of members are as provided in the constitution and bylaws of the corporation.

(b) Voting.—Each member (except an honorary, sustaining, or associate member) has one vote on each matter submitted to a vote at a meeting of the members.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1302.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 22303 | 36:3406. | Oct. 15, 1962, Pub. L. 87–817, §6, 76 Stat. 931. |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "are as provided in the constitution and bylaws of the corporation" are substituted for "shall . . . be determined as the constitution and bylaws of the corporation may provide" to eliminate unnecessary words.

In subsection (b), the words "the right to" are omitted as unnecessary.
Exhibit
32.3





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I,
Anthony J. Branca, Chief Financial Officer of ICON Capital Corp., the Manager of
the Registrant, in connection with the Quarterly Report of ICON Income Fund Ten,
LLC (the “LLC”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly
Report”) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.
            The
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the LLC.











Date:
August 8, 2008





/s/Anthony J.
Branca__


Anthony
J. Branca


Chief
Financial Officer


ICON
Capital Corp.


Manager
of ICON Income Fund Ten,
LLC
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


WOIZE
INTERNATIONAL LTD.


FORM
10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2006


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I am the
Chief Executive Officer of Woize International Ltd., a Nevada corporation (the
"Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Form 10-Q of
the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 and filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission ("Form 10-QSB").




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date:
      August 19, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Daniel
      SavinoDaniel
      Savino
              Chief
      Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 209 (Friday, October 29, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 63163]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24180]



[[Page 63163]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1549-DR]


Alabama; Amendment No. 7 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Alabama (FEMA-1549-DR), dated September 15, 2004, and 
related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 22, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Alabama is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of September 15, 2004:

    Cherokee County for Public Assistance.
    Bullock, Houston, and Jackson Counties for Public Assistance 
(already designated for Individual Assistance).

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, 
Individuals and Households Program--Other Needs; 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

Michael D. Brown,
Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of 
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 04-24180 Filed 10-28-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 217 (Wednesday, November 10, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 65147]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25052]



[[Page 65147]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Membership of the Office of the Secretary Performance Review 
Board

AGENCY: Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of additional membership on the Office of the Secretary 
Performance Review Board.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with 5 U.S.C., 4313(c)(4), DOC announces the 
appointment of persons to serve as members of the Office of the 
Secretary (OS) Performance Review Board (PRB). The OS/PRB is 
responsible for reviewing performance appraisals and ratings of Senior 
Executive Service (SES) members. The appointment of this additional 
member to the OS/PRB will be for a period of 24 months.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The effective date of service of appointee to the 
Office of the Secretary Performance Review Board is upon publication of 
this notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary King, Acting Director, Office of 
Executive Resources, Office of Human Resources Management, Office of 
the Director, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, 
(202) 482-3321.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The names, position titles, and type of 
appointment of the members of the OS/PRB are set forth below by 
organization:

Department of Commerce

Office of the Secretary

2004-2006 Performance Review Board Membership

Bureau of Industry and Security

Eileen M. Albanese, Director, Office of Exporter Services

    Dated: October 28, 2004.
Mary King,
Acting Director, Office of Executive Resources.
[FR Doc. 04-25052 Filed 11-9-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-BS-M
### §170109. Service of process

As a condition to the exercise of any power or privilege granted by this chapter, the corporation shall file, with the secretary of state or other designated official of each State, territory, or possession of the United States in which an organization, chapter, or post is organized, the name and address of an agent in that State, territory, or possession on whom legal process or demands against the corporation may be served.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1441.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 170109 | 36:1162. | Aug. 11, 1971, Pub. L. 92–93, §12, 85 Stat. 318. |

Section

The words "precedent", "herein", and "or conferred" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "with the secretary of state or other designated official" are substituted for "in the office of the Secretary" for consistency in the revised title. The words "post office" and "authorized" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "legal process" are substituted for "local process" for consistency in the revised title.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 11, 2014

p0604 

# Order

Clerk June 11, 2014

148444

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148444

COA: 312308

Oakland CC: 2012

- 240981

- FH

RICHARD LEE HARTWICK,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 19, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is G RANTED. The parties shall

include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether a defendant’s entitlement to

immunity under § 4 of the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act (MMMA), MCL 333.26421

et seq ., is a question of law for the trial court to decide; (2) whether factual disputes

regarding § 4 immunity are to be resolved by the trial court; (3) if so, whether the trial

court’s finding of fact becomes an established fact that cannot be appealed ; (4) whether a

defendant’s possession of a valid registry identification card establishes any presumption

for purposes of § 4 or § 8; (5) if not, what is a defendant’s evidentiary burden to establish

immunity under § 4 or an affirmative defense under § 8; (6) w hat role, if any, do the

verification and confidentiality provisions in § 6 of the act play in establishing

entitlement to immunity under § 4 or an affirmative defense under § 8; and (7) whether

the Court of Appeals erred in characterizing a qualifying pat ient’s physician as issuing a

prescription for, or prescribing, marijuana.

We direct the Clerk to schedule the oral argument in this case for the same future

session of this Court when it will hear oral argument in People v Tuttle (Docket No.

148971).

Persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this

case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
### §70306. Powers

The corporation has only the powers provided in its bylaws and articles of incorporation filed in each State in which it is incorporated.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1350.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 70306 | 36:2202. | Jan. 8, 1983, Pub. L. 97–427, §2, 96 Stat. 2265. |

Section

The words "and subject to the laws of such State of States" are omitted as unnecessary.
#### WILLIAMS, Respondent, v. UNION SWITCH & SIGNAL COMPANY, Appellant.

(170 N. W. 145)

(File No. 4387.

Opinion filed December 31, 1918.)

1. Carriers — Master and Servant — Negligence of Fellow Servant— Fice-Principal — “Passengers”—Former Appeal — Law of Case.

The propositions of law now presented being the same as presented on former appeal wherein all propositions were fully determined, the decision on that appeial becomes the law of the case; and upon issues submitted to jury upon conflicting evidence and under unquestioned instructions, the verdict of the jury is final.

2. Appeal — Error—Former Appeal Determinative of Issues— Whether Appeal *Frivolous*— Costs *for*Delay.

While the sole purpose of thei present appeal was to persuade the Court to overrule itself on the same questions determined on former appeal, which effort was unavailing, yet the present appeal held not frivolous, and motion to assess 10% of amount of judgment as costs is denied.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Brown County. Hon. Thomas L. Bouck, Judge.

Action by S. W. Williams, against the Union Switch & Signal Company, a corporation, to recover damages for defendant’s negligence. From a judgment for plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

*Harkin, Crane & Noll,*for Appellant.

*Campbell, Walton .&*Campbell; and *Frank McNulty,*for Respondent.

PO'LLEY, J.

This cause was before us on a former appeal and is reported in 37 S. D. 423, 158 N. W. 901. Upon a retrial of the case, the same pleadings were used and1 the evidence on behalf of both parties was practically identical with the evidence that was presented at the^ first trial. The case was submitted to tbe jury, with the result, that plaintiff had.a verdict. From the *246judgment entered upon said verdict and an order denying its •motion for new trial, defendant appeals.

[1] The propositions of law that are presented on this appeal are the -same that were presented upon the former appeal. Such propositions were all considered and fully determined' on that appeal. The' decision on that appeal then became the law of the case, and, the issues having been submitted to the jury upon conflicting evidence an-d under instructions of the court that are not questioned by appellant, the verdict of the jury is final.

There1 can be no other purpose in this appeal than to persuade 'this court to overrule itself on the same questions that -were determined on the former appeal. 'After a careful re-examination of these questions, we are unable to find any reason- for changing or receding from our former opinion.

[2] Ho-wever, -we -do not agree with respondent that the appeal is frivolous, and his motion to assess 10 per cent, of the amount of the judgment against appellant as costs is denied.

The judgment and -order appealed from are affirmed.

WHiITIN-G, P. J., and GATES, J., dissent for the reasons given in the -dissenting opinion upon the former appeal.
Ouray National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan - July 2000 3
Ouray National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan - July 2000 5
Ouray National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan - July 2000 7
Ouray National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan - July 2000 13
Ouray National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan - July 2000 17
Ouray National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan - July 2000 21
Ouray National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan - July 2000 23
Ouray National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan - July 2000 37
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A (Amendment No. 4) of Deep
Down, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, Eugene L Butler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By: /s/
EUGENE L. BUTLER


Eugene L.
Butler


Chief
Financial Officer


September
30, 2008
(November 12, 1943.)

#### In the Matter of Anthony B. Manzella, an Attorney, Respondent. Brooklyn Bar Association, Petitioner.

Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ.
### §7269. Publication of decisions

(a) The Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims shall provide for the publication of decisions of the Court in such form and manner as may be best adapted for public information and use. The Court may make such exceptions, or may authorize the chief judge to make such exceptions, to the requirement for publication in the preceding sentence as may be appropriate.

(b) Such authorized publication shall be competent evidence of the decisions of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims therein contained in all courts of the United States and of the several States without any further proof or authentication thereof.

(c) Such publications shall be subject to sale in the same manner and upon the same terms as other public documents.

(Added Pub. L. 100–687, div. A, title III, §301(a), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4118, §4069; renumbered §7269, Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §402(b)(1), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 238; amended Pub. L. 105–368, title V, §512(a)(1), Nov. 11, 1998, 112 Stat. 3341.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1998—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 105–368 substituted "Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims" for "Court of Veterans Appeals".

1991—Pub. L. 102–40 renumbered section 4069 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1998 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 105–368 effective on first day of first month beginning more than 90 days after Nov. 11, 1998, see section 513 of Pub. L. 105–368, set out as a note under section 7251 of this title.
H. R. 2452

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the seventh day of January, two thousand and three

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 339 Hicksville

Road in Bethpage, New York, as the ‘‘Brian C. Hickey Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

339 Hicksville Road in Bethpage, New York, shall be known and

designated as the ‘‘Brian C. Hickey Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Brian C.

Hickey Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
UKRAINIAN SHIPS NEED U.S. GEAR

----
EXHIBIT 99.1


                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC
                 SS.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the Annual  Report of KIK  Technology  International,  Inc.
(Company) on Form 10-KSB  (Report) for the year ended January 31, 2003, as filed
with the  Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof.  I, William M.
Knooihuizen,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ William M. Knooihuizen
-------------------------------
William M. Knooihuizen
Chief Executive Officer

Dated: April 30, 2003

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In  connection  with the Annual  Report of KIK  Technology  International,  Inc.
(Company) on Form 10-KSB  (Report) for the year ended January 31, 2003, as filed
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof.  I, Kuldip C.
Baid,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of the  Company,  certify  to the  best  of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Kuldip C. Baid
-------------------------
Kuldip C. Baid
Chief Financial Officer

Dated: April 30, 2003