alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The U.S. Ombudsman in 1997

----
EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION 

Kiowa, Hardtner & Pacific Railroad Company

JUN 1 0 2003

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning

the continuing status of Kiowa, Hardtner & Pacific Railroad Company 

(KHP) (B.A. No. 8090) as an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act

(45 U.S.C. § 231 et seq.) (RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment

Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. § 351, et seq.) (RUIA). KHP has been an

employer under the RRA and RUIA with service creditable from 

September 2, 1908.

Mr. Robert S. Wunsch, Esq. has advised that KHP assets were sold to V

and S Railway Company (B.A. No. 2796) and that KHP was dissolved as a

business organization on January 23, 2003. KHP reported no

compensation paid in 2002.

Based on the information set forth above, it is the determination of the

Railroad Retirement Board that Kiowa, Hardtner & Pacific Railroad

Company ceased being an employer under the RRA and RUIA on

January 23, 2003, the date on which it dissolved as a legal entity.

Cherryl T. Thomas

V. M. Speakman

BA#8090
1

Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Russell, David CTR (FAA)

Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 2:47 PM

To: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Cc: Hoekstra, Kathlyn (FAA)

Subject: Record of phone conversation with petitioner's representative (Aerial Production 

Services #0836)

Jake,  

Per your instruction, I contacted petitioner Aerial Production Services’ legal counsel, Michael Curran of Curran & Curran

Law, at 2:30pm on Monday, March 9. The call was made to inform the petitioner and the petitioner’s counsel that Aerial

Production’s petition (of October 7, 2014), while requesting exemptions to FAA regulations allowing it to conduct

“closed‐set motion picture filming,” did not include the required Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual

(MPTOM). The key points of the conversation are as follows:

1. I noted that the petition did not include an MPTOM.

2. I brought to Mr. Curran’s attention the fact that the base petition did not mention closed‐set motion picture

filming, and that this proposed activity does not appear in the petition until page 7 (under the petitioner’s

“Conditions and Limitations,” which perhaps were extracted from another previous grant of exemption).

3. I brought to Mr. Curran’s attention FAA Order 8900.1, Vol.3, Chap.8, Sect.1, in the event that the petitioner

needed further guidance on the production of an MPTOM.

4. I asked Mr. Curran to consider whether his client wanted the FAA to continue processing the petition without

the MPTOM, or whether the client wished to include the MPTOM. I also noted to Mr. Curran that the petitioner

could forward the MPTOM at a late date, with a request for an additional exemption (specifically for motion

picture filming).

5. (Per your instruction) I informed Mr. Curran that an answer was requested no later than close of business,

Tuesday, March 10.

Mr. Curran indicated that he could speak for Aerial Production Services, and that Aerial prefers to have the existing

petition processed as soon as possible, understanding that motion picture filming would not be permitted under the

completed grant of exemption. He stated he would follow his verbal answer with an email, affirming this decision.

Please contact me for any additional information.

Sincerely,

David Russell/SAIC 

Sr. Aviation Analyst III, Training 

Flight Technologies and Procedures Division—UAS Integration Office (DC) 

Email: david.ctr.russell@faa.gov

Direct: 202-267-9102
# L_2021101EN.01000101.xml

| 23.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 101/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 101/1

---

Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Serbia on actions carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in the Republic of Serbia

The Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Serbia on actions carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in the Republic of Serbia will enter into force on 1 May 2021, the procedure provided for in Article 14(2) of the Agreement having been completed on 8 March 2021.

---
§ 2004.38 In the event of an adverse ruling. ( a ) Notwithstanding USTR's rejection of a demand or request for records, information or testimony, if a court or other competent authority orders a USTR employee to comply with the demand, the employee promptly must notify the General Counsel of the order, and must respectfully decline to comply, citing *United States ex rel. Touhy* v. *Ragen,* 340 U.S. 462 (1951).
( b ) To seek reconsideration of USTR's rejection of a demand or request, or of any restrictions on receiving records, information or testimony, a requester must send a petition for reconsideration in accordance with § 2004.34(a) within 10 days of the date of the determination. The petition must contain a clear and concise statement of the basis for the reconsideration with supporting authorities. Determinations about petitions for reconsideration are within the discretion of the United States Trade Representative or his/her designee, and are final.
( c ) Pursuant to section 704 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 704, a petition for reconsideration of a final determination under this section is a prerequisite to judicial review.
#### BEECHER v. LEAVENWORTH STATE BANK et al.

No. 14224.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

June 16, 1954.

Rehearing Denied July 15, 1954.

S. P. Beecher, in pro. per.

C. D. Randall, Randall & Danskin & Lundin, Henry R. Newton, John J. Ripple, Spokane, Wash., Fred M. Crol-*115lard, Sr., Wenatchee, Wash., for appel-lees.

Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and ORR and POPE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellees move to dismiss this appeal on the ground that Beecher has failed to take the proper steps to perfect it. No statement of points has been filed. Rule 17(6) requires that the statement of points be filed “upon the filing of the record in this court”. In view of the already unwarranted prolongation of this litigation, see Beecher v. Leavenworth State Bank, 9 Cir., 209 F.2d 20, 21, certiorari denied 347 U.S. 949, 74 S.Ct. 649, the motion to dismiss is granted.
§ 842.613 Division of a survivor annuity. ( a ) The maximum combined total of all current and former spouse annuities (not including any benefits based on an election of an insurable interest rate) payable based on the service of a former employee or Member equals 50 percent of the rate of the self-only annuity that otherwise would have been paid to the employee, Member, or retiree.
( b ) By using the elections available under this subpart or to comply with a court order under subpart I of part 841 of this chapter, a survivor annuity may be divided into a combination of former spouse annuities and a current spouse annuity so long as the aggregate total of the current and former spouse annuities does not exceed the maximum limitation in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) Upon termination of former spouse annuity payments because of death or remarriage of the former spouse, or by operation of a court order, the current spouse will be entitled to a current spouse annuity or an increased current spouse annuity if— ( 1 ) The employee or Member died while employed in a position covered under FERS; or
( 2 ) The current spouse was married to the employee or Member continuously from the time of retirement and did not consent to an election not to provide a current spouse annuity; or
( 3 ) The current spouse married a retiree after retirement and the retiree elected, under § 842.612, to provide a current spouse annuity for that spouse in the event that the former spouse annuity payments terminate.
### §7905. Requirement of honorable discharge for veterans receiving assistance

No veteran shall receive financial assistance under this chapter unless the veteran was discharged from the Armed Forces under honorable conditions.

(Added Pub. L. 109–461, title IX, §903(a)(1), Dec. 22, 2006, 120 Stat. 3464.)
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2031

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore and make permanent 

the exclusion from gross income for amounts received under qualified 

group legal services plans and to increase the maximum amount of 

the exclusion. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2003

Mr. COLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore 

and make permanent the exclusion from gross income 

for amounts received under qualified group legal services 

plans and to increase the maximum amount of the exclusion.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2031 IH 

1 SECTION 1. EXCLUSION FOR AMOUNTS RECEIVED UNDER 

2 QUALIFIED GROUP LEGAL SERVICES PLANS 

3 RESTORED AND MADE PERMANENT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (e) of section 120 of 

5 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read 

6 as follows: 

7 ‘‘(e) APPLICATION OF SECTION.—This section and 

8 section 501(c)(20) shall apply to taxable years begin9 ning.—

10 ‘‘(1) after December 31, 1976, and before July 

11 1, 1992, and 

12 ‘‘(2) after December 31, 2002.’’

13 (b) INCREASE IN MAXIMUM EXCLUSION.—The last 

14 sentence of section 120(a) of such Code is amended by 

15 striking ‘‘$70’’ and inserting ‘‘$150’’. 

16 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

17 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

18 December 31, 2002.

Æ
### SUBCHAPTER II—HOSPITAL, NURSING HOME, OR DOMICILIARY CARE AND MEDICAL TREATMENT

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–581, title II, §202(c), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2855, inserted ", NURSING HOME," in subchapter heading.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2251 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2251

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat as a qualified use 
 for purposes of section 2032A land rented on a net cash basis to any 
                    member of the decedent's family.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 22, 2003

 Mr. Moran of Kansas introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat as a qualified use 
 for purposes of section 2032A land rented on a net cash basis to any 
                    member of the decedent's family.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAND RENTED ON NET CASH BASIS TO MEMBER OF DECEDENT'S FAMILY 
              TREATED AS QUALIFIED USE FOR ALTERNATIVE FARM VALUATION 
              OF PROPERTY UNDER SECTION 2032A.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (E) of section 2032A(c)(7) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to certain rents treated as 
qualified use) is amended by striking ``member of the family of such 
spouse or descendant'' and inserting ``member of the family of such 
decedent''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to leases entered into after December 31, 1976.
    (c) Waiver of Statute of Limitations.--If on the date of the 
enactment of this Act (or at any time within 1 year after the date of 
the enactment) a refund or credit of any overpayment of tax resulting 
from the amendment made by subsection (a) is barred by any law or rule 
of law, the refund or credit of such overpayment shall, nevertheless, 
be made or allowed if claim therefor is filed before the date 1 year 
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Argued and submitted November 29,

affirmed December 27, 2000

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*DEANGELO LEROY TURNER, *Appellant.*

(CF98-0678; CA A105654)

15 P3d 1264

Rebecca Duncan, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was David E. Groom, Public Defender.

Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Linder and Brewer, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. *State v. Hutchinson,*169 Or App 264, 9 P3d 722 (2000).
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Optium Corporation. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 2, 2008 (the “Report”), I, Eitan Gertel, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, David Renner, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

 

  (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

  (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 
|   |   | /s/ Eitan Gertel                  |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------|
|   |   | Eitan Gertel                      |
|   |   | President and CEO                 |
|   |   | Principal Executive Officer       |
|   |   | March 13, 2008               |
|   |   |                              |
|   |   | /s/ David Renner                  |
|   |   | David Renner                      |
|   |   | Vice President of Finance and CFO |
|   |   | Principal Financial Officer       |
|   |   | March 13, 2008               |

 

 

 

 

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).  Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 222 (Thursday, November 18, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 67533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25603]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Foreign Agricultural Service


Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers

AGENCY: Foreign Agricultural Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS), re-certified 
the trade adjustment assistance (TAA) petition that was filed by the 
South Carolina Shrimpers' Association and the South Carolina Growers 
Association on behalf of shrimpers and shrimp farmers. The petition was 
initially certified on November 10, 2003. Shrimpers and shrimp farmers 
who market their catch in South Carolina will be eligible to apply for 
fiscal year 2005 benefits during a 90-day period beginning on November 
29, 2004. The application period closes on February 28, 2005.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Upon investigation, the Administrator 
determined that continued increases in imports of like or directly 
competitive products contributed importantly to a decline in the 
average landed price of shrimp in South Carolina by 40.9 percent during 
the 2003 marketing period (January-December 2003), compared to the 
1997-2001 base period. Eligible producers may request technical 
assistance from the Extension Service at no cost and receive an 
adjustment assistance payment, if certain program criteria are 
satisfied. Producers in fiscal year 2005 who did not receive technical 
assistance under the fiscal year 2004 TAA program must obtain the 
technical assistance from the Extension Service by May 31, 2005, in 
order to be eligible for financial payments.
    Producers of raw agricultural commodities wishing to learn more 
about TAA and how they may apply should contact the Department of 
Agriculture at the addresses provided below for General Information.
    Producers Certified as Eligible for TAA, Contact: Farm Service 
Agency service centers.
    For General Information About TAA, Contact: Jean-Louis Pajot, 
Coordinator, Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers, FAS, USDA, (202) 
720-2916, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f78385969392d996939d8284839a929983b7919684d982849396d9909881"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="93e7e1f2f7f6bdf2f7f9e6e0e7fef6fde7d3f5f2e0bde6e0f7f2bdf4fce5">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: November 8, 2004.
A. Ellen Terpstra,
Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service.
[FR Doc. 04-25603 Filed 11-17-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-10-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of XSInventory (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael J. Evangelista, President and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/ Michael J. Evangelista                                    |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Michael J. Evangelista

President and Principal Accounting Officer

|   | May 15, 2007 |
|--------|--------------|
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 208 (Friday, October 26, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 65370]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-26397]

[[Page 65370]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID: DoD-2012-OS-0124]

Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Defense Finance and Accounting Service, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to delete a Systems of Records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Finance and Accounting Service is deleting a 
system of records notice in its existing inventory of record systems 
subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This proposed action will be effective on November 26, 2012 
unless comments are received which result in a contrary determination. 
Comments will be accepted on or before November 26, 2012.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by any of the following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 4800 Mark 
Center Drive, East Tower, 2nd Floor, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, VA 22350-
3100.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number for this Federal Register document. The general 
policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is 
to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet 
at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, 
including any personal identifiers or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Gregory Outlaw, (317) 510-4591.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Defense Finance and Accounting Service 
systems of records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 
U.S.C. 552a), as amended, have been published in the Federal Register 
and are available from the address in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. 
The proposed deletion is not within the purview of subsection (r) of 
the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the 
submission of a new or altered system report.

    Dated: October 23, 2012.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
Deletion:
    T7315.

System name:
    U.S. Savings Bond System (December 28, 2007, 72 FR 73783)

Reason:
    The U.S. Savings Bond System was retired and its functionality 
migrated to the DFAS MyPay System; the records are covered under system 
of records notice T7336, MyPay System (June 16, 2006, 71 FR 34898).

[FR Doc. 2012-26397 Filed 10-25-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
**Exhibit
      32.2**





Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§1350)





I,
      Michael A. Reisner, Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
      Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of ICON Capital Corp.,
      the Manager of the Registrant in connection with the Quarterly Report of ICON
      Income Fund Ten, LLC (the "LLC") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September
      30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the "Quarterly Report") certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





1.
            The
                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                13(a) or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m);
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
                all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                the LLC.








*Dated:
      December 11, 2007*





*/s/Michael A. Reisner*


Michael
      A. Reisner


Director,
      Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Manager


(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)


ICON
      Capital Corp.


Manager
      of ICON Income Fund Ten, LLC