alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.7


RELIANT ENERGY, INC.

2002 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN


AMENDMENT TO

KEY EMPLOYEE AWARD PROGRAM 2004-2006 AGREEMENT


THIS
AMENDMENT TO KEY EMPLOYEE AWARD PROGRAM 2004-2006 AGREEMENT
(the “Amendment”) is entered into and effective as of May 16, 2007, by and
between Reliant Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) and Joel V. Staff (the “Participant”).


WHEREAS,
on February 13, 2004, the Company granted to the Participant
performance-based Target Units that consisted of (among other awards) an Option
to purchase shares of common stock of the Company under the Reliant Energy,
Inc. 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan, formerly known as the Reliant Resources,
Inc. 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan, pursuant to a Key Employee Award Program
2004-2006 Agreement (“Agreement”), a copy of which is attached hereto; and


WHEREAS,
the Company and the Participant desire to amend the Agreement to extend the
Option exercise period upon termination of employment;


NOW,
THEREFORE, effective as of the day and year first above
written, the parties agree to amend Section 5(d) of the Agreement to read as
follows:


“(d)         Termination of Employment by the
Company or Due to Resignation.  Upon
termination of Employment of the Participant by the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries for any reason or due to voluntary resignation by the Participant,
the vested Options shall expire upon the earlier of (i) the second
anniversary of the date of termination of the Participant’s service as a
Director of the Company or (ii) the expiration of the Option Period.”


	
   

  	
  RELIANT ENERGY, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By

  	
   

  	
  /s/
  Mark M. Jacobs

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Mark M. Jacobs

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  President and Chief Executive
  Officer

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  PARTICIPANT

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Joel V. Staff

  
	
   

  	
  Joel V. Staff
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-12-0032 - Report to Congress on Abnormal Occurrences: Fiscal Year 2011

Accession Number: ML113260083

Date Released: Friday, April 29, 2022

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML113260103 - SECY-12-0032 - Report on Abnormal Occurrences: Fiscal Year 2011 (4 page(s), 2/25/2012)
    - ML113260142 - SECY-12-0032:  Enclosure 1: Report to Congress on Abnormal Occurrences: Fiscal Year 2011 (50 page(s), 2/25/2012)
    - ML113260170 - SECY-12-0032 - Enclosure 2 - The Honorable John Boehner: Congressional Letter for FY - 2011 Abnormal Occurrence Report (NUREG-0090 Vol. 34) (2 page(s), 2/25/2012)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alexander International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
Tsuida, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
6th day of August 2003.

/s/ Robert Tsuida
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
#### § 831.619 Marital status at time of retirement.

An employee or Member is unmarried at the time of retirement for all purposes under this subpart only if the employee or Member was unmarried on the date that the annuity begins to accrue.

[50 FR 20070, May 13, 1985. Redesignated at 58 FR 52882, Oct. 13, 1993]
### §1305. Disposition of land acquired by devise

The General Services Administration may take custody, for disposal as excess property under this subtitle and division C (except sections 3302, 3501(b), 3509, 3906, 4710, and 4711) of subtitle I of title 41, of land acquired by the Federal Government by devise.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1134; Pub. L. 111–350, §5(l)(12), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3852.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1305 | 40:304. | Mar. 3, 1903, ch. 1007, [§] 1 (4th complete par. on p. 1112), 32 Stat. 1112; Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 654, §4(8), 65 Stat. 709. |

Section

The words "and title III of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (41 U.S.C. 251 et seq.)" are added to provide an accurate literal translation of the word "this Act", meaning the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949. See the revision note under section 111 of this title. The words "as have been or may hereafter be" are omitted as unnecessary.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2011—Pub. L. 111–350 substituted "division C (except sections 3302, 3501(b), 3509, 3906, 4710, and 4711) of subtitle I of title 41" for "title III of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (41 U.S.C. 251 et seq.)".
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-12-0079 - Partial Closure of Petition for Rulemaking (PRM-72-6) C-10 Research and Education Foundation, Inc.

Accession Number: ML12068A090

Date Released: Wednesday, October 17, 2012

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML12068A130 - SECY-12-0079 - Partial Closure of Petition for Rulemaking (PRM-72-6) C-10 Research and Education Foundation, Inc. (9 page(s), 6/1/2012)
    - ML12068A127 - SECY-12-0079 - Enclosure 1:  The C-10 Research and Education Foundation Inc. Petition for NRC Rulemaking to Upgrade Interim Dry Cask Storage Code Requirements (12 page(s), 11/28/2008)
    - ML12068A118 - SECY-12-0079 - Enclosure 2:  Federal Register Notice - Petition for Rulemaking Submitted by C-10 Research and Education Foundation, Inc. (25 page(s), 6/1/2012)
    - ML12068A135 - SECY-12-0079 - Enclosure 3:  Letter to S. Gavutis re: C-10 Petition (3 page(s), 6/1/2012)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
# L_2020368EN.01002101.xml

| 5.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 368/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 368/21

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 120/2018

of 31 May 2018

amending Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement, on cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms [2020/1622]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Articles 86 and 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | It is appropriate to continue the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the EEA Agreement in Union actions funded from the general budget of the Union regarding the free movement of workers, coordination of social security systems and measures for migrants, including migrants from third countries. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

It is appropriate to continue the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the EEA Agreement in Union actions funded from the general budget of the Union regarding the free movement of workers, coordination of social security systems and measures for migrants, including migrants from third countries.

| (2) | Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for this extended cooperation to take place from 1 January 2018, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for this extended cooperation to take place from 1 January 2018,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In paragraphs 5 and 13 of Article 5 of Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement, the words ‘and 2017’ are replaced by the words ‘, 2017 and 2018’.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following the last notification under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement (*1).

It shall apply from 1 January 2018.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 31 May 2018.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

ISMAEL ANTONIO MURPHY-RICHARDSON, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 23-0251 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

Nos. CR2016-002165-001

 CR2016-002960-001

 CR2018-102788-001

The Honorable Ronda R. Fisk, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Philip D. Garrow

Counsel for Respondent

Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson, Florence

Petitioner

FILED 05-16-2024
STATE v. MURPHY-RICHARDSON

Decision of the Court

2

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Samuel A. Thumma, Judge Jennifer B. Campbell, and 

Michael J. Brown delivered the following decision.

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson seeks review 

of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, 

filed pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is MurphyRichardson’s third and fourth petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or legal error, this court will not 

disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. See 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577 ¶ 19 (2012). Petitioner has the burden to 

show that the superior court erred in denying the petition for postconviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, 538 ¶ 1 (App. 2011).

¶3 This court has reviewed the record in this matter, the order 

denying the petition for post-conviction relief and the petition for review. 

This court finds the petitioner has not established error. 

¶4 This court grants review but denies relief.
### §30101. Organization

(a) Federal Charter.—Big Brothers—Big Sisters of America (in this chapter, the "corporation") is a federally chartered corporation.

(b) Place of Incorporation and Domicile.—The corporation is declared to be incorporated and domiciled in the District of Columbia.

(c) Perpetual Existence.—Except as otherwise provided, the corporation has perpetual existence.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1314.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 30101 | 36:881. | Sept. 2, 1958, Pub. L. 85–870, §1, 72 Stat. 1691; Nov. 11, 1977, Pub. L. 95–167, §1(a), 91 Stat. 1347. |
| | 36:882. | Sept. 2, 1958, Pub. L. 85–870, §§2, 4(1), 72 Stat. 1691. |
| | 36:884(1). | |

Section

This section is substituted for the source provisions for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate executed and unnecessary words. The text of 36:881(b) is omitted as unnecessary because of the restatement.

The text of 36:882 is omitted as executed and obsolete.
#### § 286.3 Objective.

The objective of the program is to identify the activities of requesting U.S.-based conformity assessment bodies that have been evaluated as meeting requirements established for their acceptance by foreign governments. The evaluations may be provided by NIST or by bodies recognized by NIST for this purpose under the scope of this program.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 241 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 241

     To amend title 38, United States Code, to repeal the two-year 
 limitation on the payment of accrued benefits that are due and unpaid 
  by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs upon the death of a veteran or 
      other beneficiary under laws administered by the Secretary.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 8, 2003

  Mr. Smith of New Jersey (for himself and Mr. Evans) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend title 38, United States Code, to repeal the two-year 
 limitation on the payment of accrued benefits that are due and unpaid 
  by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs upon the death of a veteran or 
      other beneficiary under laws administered by the Secretary.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Beneficiary Fairness Act of 
2003''.

SEC. 2. PAYMENT OF ACCRUED BENEFITS.

    (a) Repeal of Limitation on Payment.--Subsection (a) of section 
5121 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking ``for a 
period not to exceed two years'' in the matter preceding paragraph (1).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect with respect to deaths occurring on or after the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
INSPECTIONS AT U.S. NUCLEAR PLANTS PROMPT CORRECTIVE ACTIONS; 

REPORTS BEING MADE PUBLIC

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission Friday began issuing reports to the nation’s 104 

operating nuclear power plants regarding inspections of the plants’ abilities to deal with power 

losses or damage to large areas of a reactor site following extreme events.

“Our inspectors found all the reactors would be kept safe even in the event their regular 

safety systems were affected by these events, although a few plants have to do a better job 

maintaining the necessary resources and procedures,” said Eric Leeds, director of the NRC’s 

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. “As with all our inspections, we’re making available to 

the public all the information not related to security issues.”

The NRC carried out the inspections in the aftermath of the March 11 earthquake and 

tsunami in Japan and the resulting damage to the Fukushima nuclear power plant. The NRC 

directed its resident inspectors at every U.S. nuclear power plant to examine several areas, 

including the plants’ mitigative strategies, sometimes called “B5b” strategies. NRC regulations 

call for these strategies to ensure plants can effectively cool down reactor cores and spent fuel 

pools following large fires, explosions or other events. The resident inspectors also examined the 

plants’ ability to deal with: the loss of all alternating-current electricity sources; major flooding 

events; and fires and flooding combined with earthquakes (although this combination is not 

covered by existing requirements).

The NRC will use its Reactor Oversight Process to further evaluate the inspection results 

and ensure any issues are fixed. Examples of inspection findings include equipment that would 

not start when tested and mitigative equipment being used for other purposes at the plant or 

being stored in potentially vulnerable areas. Because the agency set May 13 as the target date for 

completion of these inspection reports, the individual reports are being issued as they become 

available. Every plant’s inspection report will soon be available in one place on the NRC’s 

website. The NRC hopes to aggregate the information in these reports for public availability in 

the coming week.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC’s website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-081 May 13, 2011
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2015

- 0266 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2015

- NE

- 03

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into an d then out of the changed cell

.

**Estimated Costs:**

Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- hours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

co st (@$8 5 /h our) Parts Cost Total Costs (labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Borescope inspection 4 .0 $ 340.00 $0 $ 340.00 

### 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 .00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00


### The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 0 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

**On**

**- Condition Costs:** 
Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- hours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$8 5/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### : 

### N/A

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulator y action”?

YES * NO

* E xplanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:**
Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.
YES NO Explanation:

**Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:**
This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transpo rtation?

YES * NO



### * E xplanation 

### :
#### Georgia Bradley, Respondent, v. Walter Blount et al., Defendants, and Rochester Transit Corporation, Defendant-Appellant.

*1059Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


         In connection with the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report of Superior Oil
and Gas Co. (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006
(the "Report"),  I, Daniel Lloyd, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78o(d)); and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  October 20, 2006


                                             /s/ Daniel Lloyd
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Daniel Lloyd
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


         The above  certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss.1350)  and is not being filed as
part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Brand Intermediate Holdings, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Jeffrey W. Peterson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  3.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and4.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. Date: August 16, 2004 /s/ Jeffrey W. PetersonJeffrey W. PetersonChief Financial Officer and Vice President,
Finance A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. Page -37-
---

Addendum to the loan agreement dated 08/06/2005

Extension

LOAN AGREEMENT

between

Mr. Günter Thiemann Käthe-Kollwitz-Strasse 23 33428
Harsewinkel

- in the following referred to as Lender -

and

EDI Exploration Drilling International GmbH, represented by
the Managing Director [Geschäftsführer] Christian Runge Goethestrasse
59, 45721 Haltern am See

- in the following referred to as Borrower -

The loan agreement, to which this addendum applies, is changed,
effective immediately, in Section 2 paragraphs 2 and 3 as follows:

Section 2               
  Interest, term and repayment of loan

| | 2. | The term shall be extended by approx. 8 months and ends
      on March 31, 2009.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 3. | The loan shall be repaid on March 31, 2009 into the
      Lenders account.     

All of the other provisions remain unchanged and valid.

Haltern, on June 25, 2008



|[Signature]     |  |                                                        
|--------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|                |  |                                                        
|                |  | EDI Exploration Drilling International
      Rotthäuser
|Günter Thiemann |  | Christian Runge, Managing Director                     
|- Lender -      |  | - Borrower -                                           
|                |  |                                                        
|                |  |                                                        
|[File name]     |  |                                                        

---