alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Cite as Dayton v. State, 122 Ohio St.3d 544, 2009-Ohio-4119.]

T HE C ITY OF D AYTON , A PPELLANT , v . T HE S TATE OF O HIO ET AL ., A PPELLEES . [Cite as Dayton v. State, 122 Ohio St.3d 544, 2009-Ohio-4119.] Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of Lima v. State. (No. 2008-1252 — Submitted July 14, 2009 — Decided August 20, 2009.)

A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. 22221, 176 Ohio App.3d 469, 2008-Ohio-2589.

__________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority
of Lima v. State , 122 Ohio St.3d 155, 2009-Ohio-2597, 909 N.E.2d 616.
M OYER , C.J., and P FEIFER , L UNDBERG S TRATTON , O’C ONNOR , O’D ONNELL , and C UPP , JJ., concur.
L ANZINGER , J., dissents.

__________________ Green & Green, Thomas M. Green, Jane M. Lynch, and Jared A. Wagner, for appellant. Richard Cordray, Attorney General, Benjamin C. Mizer, Solicitor General, Michael L. Stokes, Assistant Solicitor, a nd Pearl M. Chin and Sharon A. Jennings, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee state of Ohio.

______________________
§ 287.1 Purpose and scope of this part. ( a ) This part outlines Federal agencies' responsibilities for using conformity assessment to meet respective agency requirements in an efficient and cost-effective manner for the agency and its stakeholders. To reduce unnecessary complexity and make productive use of Federal resources, this part emphasizes that agencies should consider coordinating conformity assessment activities with those of other appropriate government agencies (Federal, State, and local) and with those in the private sector.
( b ) Using conformity assessment in a manner consistent with this part supports U.S. Government efforts to meet trade obligations and demonstrate good regulatory practices, which reduces unnecessary obstacles to international trade and improves market access for products and services.
( c ) This part applies to all agencies which set policy for, manage, operate, or use conformity assessment. This part does not preempt the agencies' authority and responsibility to make decisions authorized by statute or required to meet regulatory, procurement, or programmatic objectives and requirements. These decision-making activities include: determining the level of acceptable regulatory or procurement risk; setting the level of protection; balancing risk, cost, and availability of technology and technical resources (where statutes permit) in establishing regulatory, procurement, and program requirements.
( d ) Each agency retains broad discretion in its selection and use of conformity assessment activities and may elect not to use or recognize alternative conformity assessment approaches if the agency deems the alternatives to be inappropriate, inadequate, or inconsistent with statutory criteria or programmatic objectives and requirements. Nothing contained in this part shall give any party any claim or cause of action against the Federal Government or any agency thereof. Each agency remains responsible for representation of the agency's views on conformity assessment in matters under its jurisdiction. Each agency also remains the primary point of contact for information on the agency's regulatory, procurement, or programmatic conformity assessment actions.
Exhibit 99.1











FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 29, 2015





FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:


Christopher L. Conway


Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer


Franklin, Tennessee


615-771-3100








CLARCOR APPOINTS NEW PRESIDENT OF THE CLARCOR


ENGINE/MOBILE FILTRATION GROUP





Franklin, TN, September 29, 2015 -- CLARCOR Inc. (NYSE: CLC) announced that today the company’s Board of Directors has confirmed the appointment of Jacob Thomas as the new President of the CLARCOR Engine/Mobile Filtration Group, replacing Sam Ferrise, who has been appointed as the company’s Senior Business Development Officer.   Mr. Thomas has global responsibility for leading the Engine/Mobile Filtration segment of the company.





Prior to joining CLARCOR, Mr. Thomas served as the President of the Diaphragm and Dosing Pumps Group of IDEX Corporation, where he managed a portfolio of businesses, including Warren Rupp.   Before that, Mr. Thomas spent seven years in executive roles for Terex Corporation, including as the President of Terex Latin America based in Sao Paulo, Brazil.  Mr. Thomas also worked for nine years for Navistar International Corporation in a series of senior positions, including as Vice President of Navistar’s Big Bore Diesel Engines business unit, and also held positions with Case Corporation and at Ford Motor Company.  Born and raised in India, Mr. Thomas holds a Bachelor of Science degree from the Indian Institute of Technology, a Masters of Science degree from The Ohio State University and an MBA from the University of Chicago Booth School of Business.





Christopher L. Conway, CLARCOR’s Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer stated, “Jacob joins us after a lengthy search to find the right individual to assume the leadership of the largest segment of CLARCOR’s business, and we could not be more pleased.   Jacob’s entire career has been focused on growing businesses in the engine/mobile sector for some of the most respected and well known public companies in the world.  His strong leadership skills, demonstrated performance in both OEM and aftermarket businesses and international experience are exactly what we need to help us grow our Engine/Mobile Filtration segment around the globe, and I know he is looking forward to making the most of this opportunity.







---



“Jacob assumes the role from Sam Ferrise, who perhaps more than any other individual has been responsible for CLARCOR’s growth and outstanding financial performance over the last 15 years.  Under Sam’s leadership, Baldwin Filters and our associated engine/mobile businesses have enjoyed tremendous growth and success.  Sam will assist me on a variety of projects and support Jacob through a smooth transition as he assumes this key leadership role.”





CLARCOR is based in Franklin, Tennessee, and is a diversified marketer and manufacturer of mobile, industrial and environmental filtration products sold in domestic and international markets. Common shares of the Company are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol CLC.  Further information on CLARCOR can be found at www.clarcor.com .





2
No. 89-1171.

#### Gonzalez-Senti *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 25.34 Evidence. ( a ) The ALJ shall determine the admissibility of evidence.
( b ) Except as provided in this part, the ALJ shall not be bound by the Federal Rules of Evidence. However, the ALJ may apply the Federal Rules of Evidence where appropriate, e.g., to exclude unreliable evidence.
( c ) The ALJ shall exclude irrelevant and inmaterial evidence.
( d ) Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or by considerations of undue delay or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.
( e ) Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if it is privileged under Federal law.
( f ) Evidence concerning offers of compromise or settlement shall be inadmissible to the extent provided in Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence.
( g ) The ALJ shall permit the parties to introduce rebuttal witnesses and evidence.
( h ) All documents and other evidence offered or taken for the record shall be open to examination by all parties, unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ pursuant to § 25.24.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-070 March 31, 2008

NRC PUBLISHES FINAL RULE ENHANCING FITNESS-FOR-DUTY REQUIREMENTS 

 The NRC published in the Federal Register today updated requirements to enhance the 

“fitness for duty” of operators, security officers and other personnel at nuclear power plants and 

certain nuclear materials facilities. The requirements will go into effect in 30 days, but the rule 

includes a phased approach for two elements of the new requirements. 

“This is an important final rule that substantially updates requirements for key plant 

personnel in operating reactors and for construction workers for new reactors,” said NRC 

Chairman Dale Klein. “This rule addresses both worker fatigue, and drug and alcohol testing. 

It also brings the NRC requirements into alignment with other federal rules and guidelines.” 

 The final rule (http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/fr/2008/20080331.pdf) 

pertains to 10 CFR Part 26 requirements, which include chemical and alcohol testing, employee 

assistance programs and work-hour limitations. It essentially requires that “fitness for duty” 

programs at NRC-licensed facilities be more effective, and establish clear and enforceable workhour controls. It also offers greater clarity on drug and alcohol testing requirements for 

construction workers who will be working on new reactor construction. 

The first 10 CFR Part 26 was finalized in 1989, with drug and alcohol testing requirements. 

The rule was expanded in 1993, and has been frequently under review since that time. Work on 

this final rule, which began in 1996, included combining it with requirements to control fatigue of 

nuclear power plant workers in 2004, several rounds of public comment and incorporation of 

several petitions for rulemaking. 

While drug and alcohol testing requirements for construction workers involved in new 

reactor plant construction will be effective within 30 days, licensees have 12 months to implement 

the portion of the new rule addressing drug and alcohol testing programs at operating sites. 

Licensees also have 18 months to be in full compliance with stricter work-hour controls, which in 

essence will reduce the number of hours certain workers can work each week. 

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
**GAO-02-1112R**                      Published: Sep 20, 2002. Publicly Released: Sep 20, 2002.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Status of FY22 Projects 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

GAO reviewed the audit report covering the financial statements of the National Fallen Firefighters Foundation, for fiscal years 2000 and 1999. GAO found no reportable instances of noncompliance. The audit report included the auditors' opinion that the financial statements of the corporation were presented fairly in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

## Full Report

Full Report (2 pages)

Accessible Text 

## Office of Public Affairs

### Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

### Public Inquiries

Public Affairs
PublicAffairs@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

Auditing and Financial Management

Accounting standardsAudit reportsFederal corporationsFinancial statement auditsReporting requirementsFinancial statementsFirefightersFederally chartered corporationFinancial managementRegulatory noncompliance
Exhibit 31.2

                                CERTIFICATION
          Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, Brent Petterson, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of New Pacific
    Ventures, Inc.

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
    statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
    make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
    statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
    this quarterly report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
    information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
    material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
    cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
    this quarterly report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
    establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
    in Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
    amended) for the registrant and have:

    a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
    information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
    particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
    prepared;

    b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
    procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
    quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

    c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
    effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
    evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
    our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
    committee of the registrant's board of directors:

    a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
    controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
    process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
    registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

    b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
    employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
    and

6.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
    quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
    controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
    controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
    corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
    weaknesses.

Dated: June 11, 2004

/s/Brent Petterson
----------------
Brent Petterson
Secretary/Treasurer/Director
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2383

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the tax treatment 

of smoking cessation costs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 5, 2003

Mr. RAMSTAD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify 

the tax treatment of smoking cessation costs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SMOKING CESSATION COSTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (b) of section 213 of 

5 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to limitation 

6 with respect to medicine and drugs) is amended to read 

7 as follows: 

8 ‘‘(b) LIMITATION WITH RESPECT TO MEDICINE AND

9 DRUGS.—An amount paid during the taxable year for 
2

•HR 2383 IH 

1 medicine or a drug shall be taken into account under sub2 section (a) only if such medicine or drug is—

3 ‘‘(1) a prescribed drug or insulin, or 

4 ‘‘(2) part of a pharmacotherapy prescribed by a 

5 physician as part of a smoking cessation program.’’. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

7 this section shall apply to taxable years ending after the 

8 date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of EOTT Energy LLC (the
   "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with
   the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
   H. Keith Kaelber, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
   Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
   906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Company.


/s/   H. KEITH KAELBER
----------------------------
H. Keith Kaelber
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
May 20, 2003
Exhibit 10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN 
 R. DENNIS HENNETT AND GREER STATE BANK 
 First Amendment 
 WHEREAS, Greer State
Bank (“Employer”) and R. Dennis Hennett (“Employee”) executed an employment agreement (the “Agreement”) on January 2, 1989; and 
 WHEREAS, Employer wishes to amend the Agreement; and 
 WHEREAS, Section 12 of the Agreement allows for
modification of the Agreement by a written instrument signed by Employee and Employer; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, Employer and Employee mutually do
covenant and agree to make the following amendments to the Agreement, each of which shall be effective as of January 1, 2005: 
 1. The
following new paragraph is added immediately at the end of Section 2: 
 “Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this
Section 2, if, upon its election to terminate Employee, Employer’s Board of Directors elects to pay Employee separation pay as provided above, in no case may the aggregate value of such payments exceed two times the lesser of: 

 

	 	(a)	The sum of the Employee’s annual compensation (as defined in Treasury Regulation §1.415-2(d)(2)) for services provided to the Employer as an employee and the
Employee’s net earnings from self-employment (as defined in § 1402(a)(1)) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the ‘Code’) for services provided to the Employer as an independent contractor, each for the
calendar year preceding the calendar year in which the Employee has a separation from service from Employer; or 

  

	 	(b)	The maximum amount that may be taken into account under a qualified plan pursuant to § 401(a)(17) of the Code for such year. 

 The foregoing limitation is included to ensure that the payment of separation pay to the Employee does not constitute deferred compensation to which the
provisions of § 409A of the Code would apply.” 
  

 1 








 2. The following new sentence is hereby added at the end of Section 5: 
 “If Employer decides, in its sole discretion, to pay Employee a bonus for a particular year, Employer shall pay such amount in full within sixty
(60) days of the end of the year for which the bonus has been awarded.” 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Employer and Employee have caused this amendment to the above-referenced Employment Agreement to be adopted and this document executed this 31st day of July, 2007. 
  

									
	IN THE PRESENCE OF:	 		 	GREER STATE BANK (Employer)
				
	/s/ David Faucette	 		 	By:	 	/s/ David M. Rogers
		 		 		 		 	David M. Rogers
	/s/ J. Richard Medlock	 		 		 	Chairman of the Board

  

					
			
	/s/ Tammy S. Budove	 		 	/s/ R. Dennis Hennett
		 		 	R. Dennis Hennett (Employee)
			
	/s/ Karen M. Corn	 		 	 

  

 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 21-0632

_________________

IN THE MATTER OF:

M.D.F. and C.R.F.,

 Youths in Need of Care.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Robert B. Allison, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 10 2022

08/10/2022
### §151301. Organization

(a) Federal Charter.—National Fallen Firefighters Foundation (in this chapter, the "corporation") is a federally chartered corporation.

(b) Nature of Corporation and Place of Incorporation.—The corporation is a charitable and nonprofit corporation incorporated under the laws of Maryland and is not an agency or establishment of the United States Government.

(c) Perpetual Existence.—Except as otherwise provided, the corporation has perpetual existence.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1399.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 151301(a) | 36:5201(a) (1st sentence). | Oct. 26, 1992, Pub. L. 102–522, title II, §§202(a), 204(a)(1), 106 Stat. 3417, 3419. |
| 151301(b) | 36:5201(a) (last sentence). | |
| 151301(c) | 36:5203(a)(1). | |

Section

Subsection (a) is substituted for "There is established the National Fallen Firefighters Foundation (hereafter in this chapter referred to as the 'Foundation')" for consistency in the revised title.

In subsection (c), the words "Except as otherwise provided" are added, and the word "existence" is substituted for "succession", for consistency in the revised title.
§ 842.303 General. ( a ) ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, no service credit is allowed for a period of separation from service.
( 2 ) Service credit is allowed for a period of separation of less than 4 days and for a period of separation during which an individual was receiving benefits under subchapter I of chapter 81 of title 5, United States Code, provided the individual returns to duty in the Government subject to FERS.
( b ) Service credit cannot be granted in excess of actual calendar time from the date of appointment to the date of separation from service.
( c ) Any period of time for which service credit under chapter 84 of title 5, United States Code, is specifically allowed by a provision of law is creditable under this subpart subject to any applicable deposit requirements.