alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 20 (Wednesday, January 30, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 485]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00305]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Immunology Integrated Review Group; Cellular 
and Molecular Immunology--B Study Section.
    Date: February 7-8, 2019.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: The William F. Bolger Center, 9600 Newbridge Drive, 
Potomac, MD 20854.
    Contact Person: Betty Hayden, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 4206, MSC 7812, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-
1223, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#640c051d00010a06240717164a0a0d0c4a030b12"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ddb5bca4b9b8b3bf9dbeaeaff3b3b4b5f3bab2ab">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in 
advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of 
December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 24, 2019.
Ronald J. Livingston, Jr.,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-00305 Filed 1-29-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Submitted on record and briefs November 3,

judgment for filing fees of $167 reversed; otherwise affirmed December 27, 2000

#### STATE ex rel ROSS LLOYD BAKER, *Appellant, v.*Dave COOK, Director, Department of Corrections, *Respondent.*

(00C-10592; CA A110010)

16 P3d 1184

Rolf C. Moan filed the brief for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong and Kistler, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*720PER CURIAM

Plaintiff, a prisoner at the Snake River Correctional Institution, appeals the trial court’s denial of his petition for a writ of mandamus. We write only to discuss the court’s action in requiring him, as part of the judgment of dismissal, to pay filing fees of $167; it had previously deferred payment of those fees. The state concedes that the trial court erred, and we agree.

When plaintiff filed his petition, he attached an Affidavit of Indigency, in which he stated that: he had $22.48 in a Department of Corrections trust account; he had no net income over the previous 12 months; he had no other money on hand or in savings; and he owned no real or personal property. Based on that affidavit, the trial court deferred the initial payment of fees. There was no further information about plaintiffs financial situation in the record when the trial court later dismissed the case.

ORS 21.605(l)(a) gives a trial court authority to defer or waive fees if it finds that a party is unable to pay them. In *Stanwood v. Multnomah County,*135 Or App 58, 61, 898 P2d 196 (1995), we held that a trial court abused its discretion when it denied a motion to waive the initial filing fees for an indigent prisoner. The same principle applies to the imposition of those fees as part of a final judgment. Nothing in the record suggests that plaintiff is or will be capable of paying the filing fees, and it was an abuse of discretion to impose them as part of the judgment.

Judgment for filing fees of $167 reversed; otherwise affirmed.
### §3746. Maturity of loans

The maturity of a loan made or guaranteed under this subchapter that is used in whole or in part for the construction, conversion, or expansion of facilities or for acquisition of real property may not exceed twenty years plus such additional reasonable time as the Secretary may determine, at the time the loan is made, is required to complete the construction, acquisition, or expansion of such facilities. The maturity of any other loan made or guaranteed under this subchapter may not exceed ten years.

(Added Pub. L. 97–72, title III, §302(a), Nov. 3, 1981, 95 Stat. 1058, §1846; amended Pub. L. 101–237, title III, §313(b)(1), Dec. 18, 1989, 103 Stat. 2077; renumbered §3746, Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 406.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–83 renumbered section 1846 of this title as this section.

1989—Pub. L. 101–237 substituted "Secretary" for "Administrator".
#### In the Matter of Claire Singer, Appellant. State Laundry Co., Inc., et al., Respondents.

Order affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No *756opinion. Present — Glennon, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.; Shientag, J., dissents and votes to reverse and grant the motion on the authority of *Beveridge*v. *New York E.*R. Co. (112 N. Y. 1), *Manson*v. *Curtis*(223 N. Y. 313), *McQuade*v. *Stoneham*(263 N. Y. 323) and *People ex rel. Manice*v. *Powell*(201 N. Y. 194). [189 Misc. 150.]
REGISTERING A COMPANY IN KAZAKHSTAN

----

**June 1998**
**by Philip H. de Leon**
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Good Buddy's Coffee
Express, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB (the "Report"), I,
Scott Massey, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



/s/ Scott Massey
------------------------------------
Scott Massey
Chief Executive Officer  and
Chief Financial Officer

November 26, 2007



<PAGE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
130809 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 130809 COA: 266062 Jackson CC: 05-000498-FC JEFFREY HARRY WOJTUSIK, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to a ppeal the February 17, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0619 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 26, 2006

Clerk
#### § 230.6 Standard Reference Materials out of stock.

Orders for out-of-stock SRM's will be returned with information as to future availability.
# L_2023102EN.01008601.xml

| 17.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 102/86 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 102/86

---

RECOMMENDATION No 2/2023 OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE ESTABLISHED BY THE AGREEMENT ON THE WITHDRAWAL OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND FROM THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY

of 24 March 2023

on Article 13(3a) of the Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland [2023/821]

THE JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (1) (‘the Withdrawal Agreement’), and in particular Article 166(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 166 (3) of the Withdrawal Agreement provides that recommendations are to be made by mutual consent. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 166 (3) of the Withdrawal Agreement provides that recommendations are to be made by mutual consent.

| (2) | Under Article 182 of the Withdrawal Agreement, the Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland (‘the Protocol’) forms an integral part of that Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Under Article 182 of the Withdrawal Agreement, the Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland (‘the Protocol’) forms an integral part of that Agreement.

| (3) | Where an arbitration panel has ruled that the United Kingdom has failed to comply with the conditions set out in Article 13(3a), third sub-paragraph, of the Protocol, swift compliance with such an arbitration panel ruling should be achieved, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Where an arbitration panel has ruled that the United Kingdom has failed to comply with the conditions set out in Article 13(3a), third sub-paragraph, of the Protocol, swift compliance with such an arbitration panel ruling should be achieved,

HAS MADE THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION:

Article 1

The Joint Committee recommends to the Union and the United Kingdom the following:

In case the arbitration panel has ruled, in accordance with Article 175 of the Withdrawal Agreement, that the United Kingdom has failed to comply with Article 13(3a), third sub-paragraph, of the Protocol, the Union and the United Kingdom agree no later than 30 days after such notification that in order to comply with the arbitration panel ruling, and as the case may be, to the extent set out therein, the Union act applies as amended or replaced by the specific Union act, as defined in Article 13(3a) of the Protocol, as from the first day of the second month following the notification of the arbitration panel ruling to the Union and the United Kingdom.

Article 2

This Recommendation shall take effect on the day following the date on which it is made.

Done at London, 24 March 2023.

For the Joint Committee

The Co-chairs

Maroš ŠEFČOVIČ

James CLEVERLY

---

(1)  
  OJ L 29, 31.1.2020, p. 7.

1

---
No. II-10-030 April 20, 2010 

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416 

NRC SCHEDULES MEETING TO DISCUSS SAFETY 

PERFORMANCE OF HONEYWELL METROPOLIS FACILITY 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a public meeting in Metropolis, 

Ill., on April 29 to discuss its latest evaluation of safety performance at the Honeywell Specialty 

Chemicals plant, including a decision to conduct additional inspections at the facility. The 

Honeywell plant processes uranium for use in commercial nuclear power plant fuel. 

 The meeting is scheduled to begin at 7 p.m. (CDT) at the Massac County Courthouse, 1 

Superman Square, in Metropolis. The public can observe the business portion of the meeting and 

NRC staff will be available after that session to answer questions or provide further information 

about NRC oversight of the facility. 

 The NRC’s evaluation of Honeywell, called a Licensee Performance Review, covered a 

period beginning January 6, 2008, and ending January 6, 2010. The review found that Honeywell 

continued to operate safely and securely but the NRC identified Safety Operations and 

Radiological Controls as two areas needing improvement. The NRC staff has asked Honeywell 

officials to discuss these two areas at the meeting as well as the reasons for onsite and offsite 

doses that were well below regulatory limits but higher than in previous years. 

 Based on the review, the NRC will conduct additional inspections at the Honeywell plant 

and decrease the next review period from 24 to 18 months. 

 The NRC letter to Honeywell discussing the performance review is available by going to 

the NRC web site at www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html and entering the document 

number ML100780373. 

 

### 

ews releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

245 Peachtree Center Ave. NE, Suite 1200 

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2009-NM-247-AD

Costs:

Labor per airplane (1 work hour(s) x $85/hour) $ 340

Parts per airplane $ + 0

Cost per airplane $ 340

Number of U.S.-registered airplanes 

x

 354

Total fleet cost $120,360

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
§ 630.1102 Definitions. In this subpart: *Agency* means— ( 1 ) An “Executive agency,” as defined in 5 U.S.C. 105; or
( 2 ) A Judicial branch entity.
*Committed relationship* has the meaning given that term in subpart I of this part.
*Disaster or emergency* means a major disaster or emergency, as declared by the President, that results in severe adverse effects for a substantial number of employees (e.g., loss of life or property, serious injury, or mental illness as a result of a direct threat to life or health).
*Domestic partner* has the meaning given that term in subpart I of this part.
*Emergency leave donor* means a current employee whose voluntary written request for transfer of annual leave to an emergency leave transfer program is approved by his or her employing agency.
*Emergency leave recipient* means a current employee for whom the employing agency has approved an application to receive annual leave under an emergency leave transfer program.
*Emergency leave transfer program* means a program established by OPM that permits Federal employees to transfer their unused annual leave to other Federal employees adversely affected by a disaster or emergency, as declared by the President.
*Employee means* — ( 1 ) An employee as defined in 5 U.S.C. 6331(1); or
( 2 ) An employee of a Judicial branch entity.
*Family member* has the meaning given that term in § 630.902.
*Leave year* has the meaning given that term in § 630.201.
*Parent* has the meaning given that term in subpart I of this part.
*Son or daughter* has the meaning given that term in subpart I of this part.
*Transferred annual leave* means donated annual leave credited to an approved emergency leave recipient's annual leave account.
[73 FR 65500, Nov. 4, 2008, as amended at 75 FR 33497, June 14, 2010]
VOGTLE APPLICATION FOR NEW REACTORS 

AVAILABLE ON NRC WEBSITE 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission today made available the public version of a 

combined license (COL) application for two new reactors at the Vogtle site near Waynesboro, 

Ga. 

The applicant, Southern Nuclear, submitted the application and associated information 

March 31. The application, minus proprietary or security-related details, is available on the 

NRC Web site here: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-licensing/col.html . 

Southern’s COL application seeks approval to build and operate two AP1000 reactors at 

the site, approximately 26 miles southeast of Augusta, Ga. The AP1000 is a 1,100 MWe 

pressurized-water reactor design the NRC certified in 2006. 

The NRC staff is currently conducting an initial check of the application to determine 

whether it contains sufficient information required for a formal review. If the application passes 

the initial check, the NRC will “docket,” or accept it for review; this decision is expected by the 

end of May. If the staff accepts the application for formal review, the NRC will then notice an 

opportunity for the public to request an adjudicatory hearing on the application. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-076 April 15, 2008
### §7651. Authority for program

(a) As part of the Educational Assistance Program, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs may select qualified individuals to receive assistance under this subchapter.

(b) To be eligible to receive assistance under this subchapter, an individual must be accepted for enrollment or be enrolled as a full-time student at a qualifying educational institution in a course of education or training that is approved by the Secretary and that leads toward completion of a degree in a health profession involving direct patient care or care incident to direct patient care.

(Added Pub. L. 101–366, title II, §205(a)(1), Aug. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 439, §4351; renumbered §7651, Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §402(b)(1), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 238.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–40 renumbered section 4351 of this title as this section.
EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Los Angeles Union Passenger Terminal

c/o Union Pacific Railroad

NOV 2 1 2002

This is a determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning

the continued status of Los Angeles Union Passenger Terminal (LAUP)

(BA No. 4736) as an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act (45

U.S.C. § 231 et seq.) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45

U.S.C. § 351 et seq.).

Mr. Jim Coulton, Senior Director, Federal Taxes, Union Pacific

Railroad, has advised that the Union Pacific Railroad’s 23% interest in

LAUP was exchanged to the Santa Fe Pacific Realty (through Union

Pacific Realty Company) effective January 19, 1990. The only assets

LAUP owned at that time were land and buildings. Mr. Coulton

advises that there are no payroll records indicating that LAUP had

employees within at least the last twenty years.

The Railroad Retirement Board’s regulations provide that the employer

status of any company or person shall terminate whenever such

company or person loses any of the characteristics essential to the

existence of an employer status. (20 CFR § 202.11). The information

summarized above indicates that LAUP no longer possesses the

characteristics of an operating railroad company. The Board therefore

finds that effective April 16, 2002, the date the Board first received

notification that LAUP was no longer in operation, LAUP ceased being

a covered employer under section l(a)(l)(i) of the Railroad Retirement

Act (45 U.S.C. § 23l(a)(l)(i)) and the corresponding provision of the

Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act.

CherryIvT. Thomas

y '

Jerome F. Kever

BA# 4736
### §80504. Membership

(a) Eligibility.—Except as provided in this chapter, eligibility for membership in the corporation and the rights and privileges of members are as provided in the articles of incorporation and bylaws.

(b) Nondiscrimination.—The terms of membership may not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, or national origin.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1363.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 80504(a) | 36:1605. | Dec. 4, 1980, Pub. L. 96–497, §§3 (related to discrimination in membership), 5, 94 Stat. 2595. |
| 80504(b) | 36:1603 (related to discrimination in membership). | |

Section
# L_2022267EN.01004801.xml

| 13.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 267/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 267/48

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 195/2022

of 10 June 2022

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2022/1895]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2070 of 25 November 2021 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 as regards the list of air carriers banned from operating or subject to operational restrictions within the Union (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2070 of 25 November 2021 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 as regards the list of air carriers banned from operating or subject to operational restrictions within the Union (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 66zab (Commission Regulation (EC) No 474/2006) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32021 R 2070: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2070 of 25 November 2021 (OJ L 421, 26.11.2021, p. 31).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32021 R 2070: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2070 of 25 November 2021 (OJ L 421, 26.11.2021, p. 31).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2070 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 11 June 2022, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 10 June 2022.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Nicolas VON LINGEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 421, 26.11.2021, p. 31.

1

(*)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*

---
Board Coverage Decision

2010-42.22

Terminal Storage Commission Company of

Washington

Employer Coverage Terminated*

No Decision Published

BA # 4361
Hillsborough,

June, 1898.

#### Tucker, *Trustee, v.*New Hampshire Trust Co.

Petition, for a decree of priority for the plaintiff’s claims against all the assets in the hands of the assignee of the New Hampshire Trust Company not subject to any specific lien. The facts appear in *Tucker*v. *Trust Co., ante, p.*187.

, *Samuel C. Eastman,*for the plaintiff.

*Oliver E. Branch,*for the defendants.

Pike, J.

The plaintiff, in argument, based his petition upon questions that were determined in *Tucker*v. *Trust Co., ante, p.*187.

*Petition dismissed.*

Blodgett, Parsons, and Peaslee, JJ., did not sit:, the others concurred.
### [§312a. Repealed. Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title VI, §629(d)(1), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3297]

Section, added Pub. L. 92–581, §1(3), Oct. 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1277; amended Pub. L. 97–295, §3(3), Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1303; Pub. L. 102–25, title VII, §702(b)(1), (c), Apr. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 117, related to special pay for nuclear-trained and qualified enlisted members.