alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §22309. Records and inspection

(a) Records.—The corporation shall keep—

(1) correct and complete records of account;

(2) minutes of the proceedings of its members, board of directors, and committees having any of the authority of its board of directors; and

(3) at its principal office, a record of the names and addresses of its members entitled to vote.

(b) Inspection.—A member entitled to vote, or an agent or attorney of the member, may inspect the records of the corporation for any proper purpose, at any reasonable time.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1303.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 22309(a) | 36:3413 (1st sentence). | Oct. 15, 1962, Pub. L. 87–817, §13, 76 Stat. 932. |
| 22309(b) | 36:3413 (last sentence). | |

Section

The word "records" is substituted for "books and records" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code.
### §3204. Restrictions on use of penalty mail

(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section or section 3220(a) of this title, an officer, executive department, or independent establishment of the Government of the United States may not mail, as penalty mail, any article or document unless—

(1) a request therefor has been previously received by the department or establishment; or

(2) its mailings is required by law.

(b) Subsection (a) of this section does not prohibit the mailing, as penalty mail, by an officer, executive department, or independent agency of—

(1) enclosures reasonably related to the subject matter of official correspondence;

(2) informational releases relating to the census of the United States and authorized by title 13;

(3) matter concerning the sale of Government securities;

(4) forms, blanks, and copies of statutes, rules, regulations, instructions, administrative orders, and interpretations necessary in the administration of the department or establishment;

(5) agricultural bulletins;

(6) lists of public documents offered for sale by the Superintendent of Documents;

(7) announcements of the publication of maps, atlases, and statistical and other reports offered for sale by the Federal Power Commission as authorized by section 825k of title 16; or

(8) articles or documents to educational institutions or public libraries, or to Federal, State, or other public authorities.

(Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 752; Pub. L. 99–87, §1(c)(1), Aug. 9, 1985, 99 Stat. 291.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1985—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 99–87 substituted "section or section 3220(a) of this title," for "section," in introductory provisions.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1971, pursuant to Resolution No. 71–9 of the Board of Governors. See section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note preceding section 101 of this title.

#### Transfer of Functions

The Federal Power Commission was terminated, and its functions, personnel, property, funds, etc., were transferred to the Secretary of Energy (except for certain functions which were transferred to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) by sections 7151(b), 7171(a), 7172(a), 7291, and 7293 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.
<PAGE>
Exhibit 10.3


                   MODIFICATION & EXTENSION OF TRUST DEED NOTE

On February 24, 2005, Penge Corporation, Kirk Fischer, and Lori Fischer executed
a Note and Trust Deed in favor of Monitor Finance, L.C. and First Capital
Funding, L.C. in the amount of $172,000.00. Penge Corporation, Kirk Fischer, and
Lori Fischer hereby acknowledge that the current balance owing is $101,147.82.

The parties hereby modify said Trust Deed Note as follows:

"The balloon date is amended to 7/1/07."
"A fee of $5,057.39 shall be charged for said extension"

The parties acknowledge that the same terms and conditions of the original Note,
date Feb. 24, 2005, and Trust Deed will remain in force and unchanged with
exception of the above modifications.

Date: July 1, 2006

/s/ Kirk Fischer
______________________________
Kirk Fischer


______________________________
Penge Corporation
By: _________________
Its: _________________


/s/ Miles C. Pitcher
______________________________
Monitor Finance, L.C.
By: Miles C. Pitcher
Its: Co-Operating Manager


/s/ Derek Ollivier
______________________________
First Capital Funding, L.C.
By: Derek Ollivier
Its: Member
#### § 717.5 Post-inspection activities.

BIS will forward a copy of the final inspection report to the inspected facility for their review upon receipt from the OPCW. Facilities may submit comments on the final inspection report to BIS, and BIS will consider them, to the extent possible, when commenting on the final report. BIS will also send facilities a post-inspection letter detailing the issues that require follow-up action and the date on which the report on inspection-related costs (see § 717.4 of the CWCR) is due to BIS.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the Report) of A4S
Security, Inc., (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, each
of the undersigned Thomas Marinelli, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Jeffrey G. McGonegal, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigneds knowledge and
belief:

(1)       
          the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                        |                                                                  
|----------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2005 | By: /s/ Thomas Marinelli
Thomas Marinelli
Chief Executive Officer

|                        |                                                           
|----------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2005 | By: /s/ Jeffrey G. McGonegal
      Chief Financial Officer

*    *    *    *    *

A signed original of the written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
ADDENDUM TO THE FINAL STATEMENT OF REASONS

Response to 45-day comments

Comment No. 12: Regulations should be based on sound science to minimize short-term harm 

to several important tree and vine cropping systems of the regions. A measured approach to 

regulating oxyfluorfen, a key herbicide active ingredient, is even more warranted when one 

considers that the proposed "...restrictions on nonfumigant products will provide minimal overall

reduction in VOC emission and resulting ozone air concentrations" (Initial Statement of Reason 

and Public Report, page 4) yet could present a significant challenge to summer weed 

management programs in San Joaquin Valley orchard cropping systems. 

Response: See response to comment no. 3. 

Comment No. 47: Why do the prohibitions apply to a subset of San Joaquin Valley's seven crops 

rather than all crops that currently use or could use potentially high -VOC emitting nonfumigant 

pesticides.

Response: Abamectin, chlorpyrifos, gibberellins, and oxyfluorfen products are used for several 

dozen crops. The top ten crops account for more than 96 percent of the emissions from these 

pesticide products in the San Joaquin Valley ozone NAA and approximately 92 percent of the 

agricultural applications are applied to alfalfa, almonds, citrus, cotton, grapes, walnuts, and 

pistachios. Most of the minor crops have low emissions and the efficacy of the low-VOC 

products is uncertain in many cases. Restriction of high- VOC products in the seven crops would 

give the necessary reduction. The efficacy and feasibility of using low-VOC products for other 

crops is unknown.

Comment No. 59: All pesticide products containing chlorpyrifos should be cancelled to reduce 

both VOC emissions and toxic air contamination.

Response: It is not necessary to cancel all pesticide products containing chlorpyrifos to achieve 

the necessary reductions in the San Joaquin Valley ozone NAA. The restrictions on use of highVOC products containing chlorpyrifos would give the necessary reduction.

Response to 15-day comment

Richard Matoian's Comment: No suitable substitute for high-VOC oxyfluorfen. It will be 

necessary to supplement with additional herbicides resulting in an economic hardship for 

pistachio growers.

Response: Not relevant to the modified text. The modified text allowed for an exemption to use 

oxyfluorfen at a reduced application rate. This comment addresses the language originally 

proposed which placed restrictions on high-VOC oxyfluorfen products.
§ 2006.14 Information not available. If the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative does not have, and cannot obtain from other Federal agencies, information requested in writing by any person, the Section 301 Chairman shall, within 30 days after the receipt of the request: ( a ) Request the information from the foreign government involved; or
( b ) Decline to request the information and inform the person in writing of the reasons for the refusal.
### §3661. Postal services

(a) The Postal Service shall develop and promote adequate and efficient postal services.

(b) When the Postal Service determines that there should be a change in the nature of postal services which will generally affect service on a nationwide or substantially nationwide basis, it shall submit a proposal, within a reasonable time prior to the effective date of such proposal, to the Postal Regulatory Commission requesting an advisory opinion on the change.

(c) The Commission shall not issue its opinion on any proposal until an opportunity for hearing on the record under sections 556 and 557 of title 5 has been accorded to the Postal Service, users of the mail, and an officer of the Commission who shall be required to represent the interests of the general public. The opinion shall be in writing and shall include a certification by each Commissioner agreeing with the opinion that in his judgment the opinion conforms to the policies established under this title.

(Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 764; Pub. L. 109–435, title VI, §604(f), Dec. 20, 2006, 120 Stat. 3242.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 109–435 substituted "Postal Regulatory Commission" for "Postal Rate Commission".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1971, pursuant to Resolution No. 71–9 of the Board of Governors. See section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note preceding section 101 of this title.

#### Commission on Postal Service

Pub. L. 94–421, §7, Sept. 24, 1976, 90 Stat. 1307, related to establishment, appointment and compensation of personnel and officers of a Commission on Postal Service and its duty to determine public service aspects of Postal Service and extent to which public service aspects of Postal Service are to be supported by appropriations, to study rate making, and to review service levels and electronic fund transfers and communication techniques, with appropriate recommendations to be transmitted to President and Congress on or before Mar. 15, 1977, 60 days after which transmittal it was to cease to exist.
#### § 839.1113 If I elect to change my retirement coverage under the FERCCA, can I change my decision about making a deposit or redeposit for civilian or military service?

Yes, you or your survivor will have a new opportunity to decide whether to pay any deposits or redeposits.
Editorial Note on Part 4
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 80 FR 70154, Nov. 13, 2015.

§ 4.31 Fees. ( a ) The only fee to be charged to an individual under this part is for duplication of records at the request of the individual. Components shall charge a fee for duplication of records under the Act in the same way in which they charge a duplication fee under § 4.11, except as provided in this section. Accordingly, no fee shall be charged or collected for: search, retrieval, or review of records; copying at the initiative of the Department without a request from the individual; transportation of records; or first-class postage.
( b ) The Department shall provide an individual one copy of each record corrected or amended pursuant to the individual's request without charge as evidence of the correction or amendment.
( c ) As required by the United States Office of Personnel Management in its published regulations implementing the Act, the Department shall charge no fee for a single copy of a personnel record covered by that agency's Government-wide published notice of systems of records.
### §313. Tests of materials

(a) Scope.—This section applies to any article or commodity tendered by a producer or vendor for sale or lease to the General Services Administration or to any procurement authority acting under the direction and control of the Administrator of General Services pursuant to this subtitle.

(b) Authority To Conduct Tests.—The Administrator, in the Administrator's discretion and with the consent of the producer or vendor, may have tests conducted, in a manner the Administrator specifies, to—

(1) determine whether an article or commodity conforms to prescribed specifications and standards; or

(2) aid in the development of specifications and standards.

(c) Fees.—

(1) In general.—The Administrator shall charge the producer or vendor a fee for the tests.

(2) Amount of fee if tests predominantly serve interest of producer or vendor.—If the Administrator determines that conducting the tests predominantly serves the interest of the producer or vendor, the Administrator shall fix the fee in an amount that will recover the costs of conducting the tests, including all components of the costs, determined in accordance with accepted accounting principles.

(3) Amount of fee if tests do not predominantly serve interest of producer or vendor.—If the Administrator determines that conducting the tests does not predominantly serve the interest of the producer or vendor, the Administrator shall fix the fee in an amount the Administrator determines is reasonable for furnishing the testing service.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1073.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 313(a) | 40:756(g) (1st sentence words before 1st comma). | June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title I, §109(g) (1st–3d sentences), as added Sept. 5, 1950, ch. 849, §3(b), 64 Stat. 579; Pub. L. 86–591, July 5, 1960, 74 Stat. 330. |
| 313(b) | 40:756(g) (1st sentence words after 1st comma). | |
| 313(c) | 40:756(g) (2d, 3d sentences). | |

Section

In subsection (b), the word "contemplated" is omitted as unnecessary.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as  amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Neuroscience Integrated Review Group; Cellular and Molecular Biology of Neurodegeneration Study Section.                    

*Date:*                         January 31-February 1, 2019.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Catamaran Hotel, 3999 Mission Boulevard, San Diego, CA 92109.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Laurent Taupenot, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4183, MSC 7850, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-1203,                         *taupenol@csr.nih.gov.*

This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 18, 2019.

Natasha M. Copeland, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2019-00203 Filed 1-28-19; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
# L_2020026EN.01007501.xml

| 30.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 26/75 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 26/75

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 76/2018

of 23 March 2018

amending Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement, on cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms [2020/93]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Articles 86 and 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | It is appropriate to extend the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to include Council recommendation of 22 May 2017 on the European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning and repealing the recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on the establishment of the European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

It is appropriate to extend the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to include Council recommendation of 22 May 2017 on the European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning and repealing the recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on the establishment of the European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning (1).

| (2) | Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in paragraph 8 of Article 4 of Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32017 H 0615: Council recommendation of 22 May 2017 on the European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning and repealing the recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on the establishment of the European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning (OJ C 189, 15.6.2017, p. 15).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32017 H 0615: Council recommendation of 22 May 2017 on the European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning and repealing the recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on the establishment of the European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning (OJ C 189, 15.6.2017, p. 15).’

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on 24 March 2018, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 23 March 2018.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ C 189, 15.6.2017, p. 15.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 IGNACIA S. MORENO Assistant Attorney General Environment & Natural Resources Division

MICHELLE R. LAMBERT Trial Attorneys Environmental Defense Section P.O. Box 23986 Washington, D.C. 20026

- 3986 Tel: (202) 616

- 7501 michelle.lambert@usdoj.gov Attorney fo r Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRI CT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

WILDEARTH GUARDIANS

,

Plaintiff,

v. LISA JACKSON, Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, sued in her official capacity,

Defendant. No. 2:11

- cv

- 01661

- ROS

NOTICE OF LODGING OF PROPOSED CONSENT DECREE

Defendant Lisa Jackson, in her off icial capacity as Administrator of the United

States En vironmental Protection Agency ( “EPA”), hereby lodges with the Court a

proposed consent decree that contains the terms of a proposed settlement of this action.

See Attachment 1, Consent Decree.

The proposed consent decree should not be signed or entered by the Court at

this time. Pursuant to section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7413(g), the EPA

Administrator must provide “a reasonable opportunity by notice in the Fe deral Register to

persons who are not named as parties or intervenors to the action or matter to comment in Case 2:11-cv-01661-ROS Document 17 Filed 12/12/11 Page 1 of 31

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 writing” upon the proposed consent decree. Accordingly, EPA will publish in the Federal

Register a notice of the proposed consent decree and reques t comments. After a

reasonable comment period, the EPA Administrator will promptly consider any written

comments received and, if none of the comments disclose facts or considerations which

indicate that the proposed consent decree is inappropriate, impro per, inadequate, or

inconsistent with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, Defendant will move for entry of

the decree.

Respectfully submitted,

IGNACIA S. MORENO Assistant Attorney General Environment and Natural Resources Division

/s/ Michelle R. Lambert Michelle R. Lambert United States Department of Justice Environmental Defense Section P.O. Box 23986 Washington, D.C. 20026

- 3986 Tel: (202) 616

- 7501 Fax: (202) 514

- 8865 michelle.lambert@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Defendants Dated: December 12 , 201 1 Case 2:11-cv-01661-ROS Document 17 Filed 12/12/11 Page 2 of 31

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3 C ERTIFICATE OF SER VICE

I, Michelle R. Lambert , hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing

N otice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree was served by Notice of Electronic Filing

this 12 th day of December , 201 1 , upon all counsel of record usin g the Court’s CM/ECF

system.

/s/ Michelle R. Lambert Case 2:11-cv-01661-ROS Document 17 Filed 12/12/11 Page 3 of 3
Armenia Privatization

----