alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
December 12, 2006

Dr. Edwin A. Theriot, Chief

Interagency and International Services 

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

441 G Street, N.W. 

Washington, DC 20314-1000

Dear Dr. Theriot: 

Enclosed for your signature are two final copies of the memorandum of understanding (MOU)

between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the U.S. Army Corps of

Engineers (USACE). The intent of this MOU is to facilitate interactions between the NRC and

USACE, on matters of mutual interest. The MOU was developed in coordination with NRC and

USACE staff. Preliminary agreement between the USACE and NRC on the contents of the

MOU was reached in October 2006. 

We are enclosing two signed copies of the MOU. Upon signing the two original documents,

please return one of the signed originals. Should you wish to discuss this matter further, please

let me know.

Sincerely, 

/RA/

Luis A. Reyes 

Executive Director

 for Operations 

Enclosures: As stated 
December 12, 2006

Dr. Edwin A. Theriot, Chief

Interagency and International Services 

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

441 G Street, N.W. 

Washington, DC 20314-1000

Dear Dr. Theriot: 

Enclosed for your signature are two final copies of the memorandum of understanding (MOU)

between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the U.S. Army Corps of

Engineers (USACE). The intent of this MOU is to facilitate interactions between the NRC and

USACE, on matters of mutual interest. The MOU was developed in coordination with NRC and

USACE staff. Preliminary agreement between the USACE and NRC on the contents of the

MOU was reached in October 2006. 

We are enclosing two signed copies of the MOU. Upon signing the two original documents,

please return one of the signed originals. Should you wish to discuss this matter further, please

let me know.

Sincerely, 

/RA/

Luis A. Reyes 

Executive Director

 for Operations 

Enclosures: As stated 

Distribution:

RidsNrrOd RidsNsirOd RidsNrrAdra RidsNrrDnrl RidsNrrWpcMail 

ADAMS Package- ML062920147 Memorandum-ML062920170 Letter-ML062920234

MOU-ML062920211

OFFICE NRR/ADRA Tech Editor NRR/DNRL NRO/DNRL OD/NRO OGC

NAME VAPerin via Email JRTappert DBMatthews RWBorchardt RABaum

DATE 10/19/2006 10/26/2006 10/25/2006 11/22/06 11/23/06 10/30/2006

OFFICE OCFO ADM NRR/PMDA OD:NRR EDO 

NAME TIPulliam MLScott RWMitchell JEDyer L. Reyes

DATE 11/03/2006 11/08/2006 11/29/06 12/05/06 12/12/06
B.C.D. 01-34

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Central Midland Railway Company

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning the status of Central

Midland Railway Company as an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C.

§ 231 et seg.) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. § 351 et seq.).

Information regarding Central Midland was provided by Susan Ferverda, Vice President 

Human Resources, Central Midland. According to Ms. Ferverda, Central Midland began

doing business January 2, 2001. Thomas G. Hoback is the chief executive officer of 

Central Midland.

In Surface Transportation Board Finance Docket No. 33988, Central Midland filed a notice 

of exemption to enter into an operating agreement with Missouri Central Railroad Company,

a covered employer under the Acts (B.A. No. 2881), to operate approximately 244.5 miles 

of rail line owned by the Missouri Central Railroad and approximately 33.5 miles owned by

the Union Pacific Railroad. This line was formerly operated by General Railway Corporation 

(B.A. No. 9846), also under a contract with the Missouri Central Railroad. It interchanges 

with the Union Pacific, the Burlington Northern Santa Fe, the Norfolk Southern, CSXT, and

several other railroads.

The evidence of record establishes that the Central Midland is a rail carrier operating in

interstate commerce. Accordingly, it is determined that Central Midland is an employer

within the meaning of section 1 (a)( 1 )(i) of the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. §

231 (a)( 1 )(i)) and the corresponding provision of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act

as of January 2, 2001, the date as of which it commenced operations.

V. M. Speakman, Jr.

BA# 4869
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v.
ISMAEL ANTONIO MURPHY

- RICHARDSON , Petitioner

.

No. 1 CA

- CR 23

- 0251 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No s
. CR2016

- 002165

- 001 CR2016

- 002960

- 001 CR2018

- 102788

- 001 The Honorable Ronda R. Fisk , Judge REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL Maricopa County Attorney’s Office , Phoenix By Philip D. Garrow Counsel for Respondent Ismael Antonio Murphy

- Richardson, Florence Petitioner FILED 05-16-2024STATE v. MURPHY

- RICHARDSON Decision of the Court

2 MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Samuel A. Thumma , Judge Jennifer B. Campbell , and Michael J. Brown delivered the following decision.

PER CURIAM : ¶1 Petitioner Ismael Antonio Murphy

- Richardson seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post

- conviction relief, filed pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Proce dure 32.1. This is Murphy

Richardson’s third and fourth petition. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or legal error, this court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief. S ee S tate v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577 ¶ 19 (2012). Petitioner has the burden to show that the superior court erred in denying the petition for post

conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ari z. 537, 538 ¶ 1 (App. 2011)

. ¶3 This court has reviewed the record in this matter, the order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief and the petition for review. This court finds t he petitioner has not established error
. ¶4 This court grants review but den ies relief.
###### Editorial Note on Subpart C of Part 9701

#### Editorial Note:

At 73 FR 58435, Oct. 7, 2008, the application of subpart C to part 9701 was rescinded.

#### § 9701.341 General.

Sections 9701.342 through 9701.346 describe various types of performance-based pay adjustments that are part of the pay system established under this subpart. Generally, these within-band pay increases are directly linked to an employee's rating of record (as assigned under the performance management system described in subpart D of this part). These provisions are designed to provide DHS with the flexibility to allocate available funds based on performance as a means of fostering a high-performance culture that supports mission accomplishment. While performance measures primarily focus on an employee's contributions (as an individual or as part of a team) in accomplishing work assignments and achieving mission results, performance also may be reflected in the acquisition and demonstration of required competencies.
Board Coverage Decision 

2001-65

Employee Service Determination

Effective July 03, 2001

No Decision Published
### §3747. Eligible financial institutions

The Secretary may not guarantee under this subchapter a loan made by an entity not subject to examination and supervision by an agency of the United States or of a State.

(Added Pub. L. 97–72, title III, §302(a), Nov. 3, 1981, 95 Stat. 1058, §1847; amended Pub. L. 101–237, title III, §313(b)(1), Dec. 18, 1989, 103 Stat. 2077; renumbered §3747, Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 406.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–83 renumbered section 1847 of this title as this section.

1989—Pub. L. 101–237 substituted "Secretary" for "Administrator".
BISNIS Trades & Tenders, August 18, 1997

----

INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT, U.S. & FOREIGN COMMERCIAL SERVICE AND U.S.DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 1997.  ALL RIGHTS RESERVED OUTSIDE OF THE UNITEDSTATES.
THE BUSINESS INFORMATION SERVICE FOR THE NEWLY INDEPENDENT STATES (BISNIS)HAS CREATED THE BISNIS TRADES AND TENDERS ELECTRONIC NEWSLETTER TO HELP U.S.COMPANIES FIND BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES IN THE EXPANDING MARKETS OF THE NEWLYINDEPENDENT STATES (NIS) OF THE FORMER SOVIET UNION.
THESE OPPORTUNITIES ARE PROVIDED SOLELY AS AN INFORMATIONAL SERVICE AND DONOT REPRESENT AN ENDORSEMENT BY THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE.VERIFICATION OF LEADS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE READER. BISNIS MAY CONSIDEROTHER PRIVATE SECTOR-GENERATED TRADE LEADS AND TENDERS, IN ELECTRONIC FORMONLY, AND PUBLISH ON A SPACE-AVAILABLE BASIS. PLEASE SEND YOUR LEADS TO[email protected]
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-10-0044 - Review of Final Rule Package, "Export and Import of Nuclear Equipment and Material; Updates and Clarifications (RIN 3150-AI16)

Accession Number: ML100990503

Date Released: Thursday, June 17, 2010

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML100990496 - SECY-10-0044 - Review of Final Rule Package, "Export and Import of Nuclear Equipment and Material; Updates and Clarifications (RIN 3150-AI16) (7 page(s), 4/13/2010)
    - ML100351180 - SECY-10-0044 - Enclosure 1, Final Rule, Part 110 Update - Federal Register Notice (RIN 3150-AI16) - Export and Import of Nuclear Equipment and Material; Updates and Clarifications (90 page(s), 4/13/2010)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
Summary of Executive Officer Benefits and Board of Directors Benefits



 Exhibit 10(p) 
  
 SUMMARY OF EXECUTIVE OFFICER BENEFITS AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS BENEFITS 
 AND FEES * 
  

					
	 Description of Benefit

	  	 Eligible Positions

	  	 Amount/Schedule


	Automobile Allowance	  	Chief Executive Officer	  	$1,500/month
	 	  	Chief Operating Officer	  	$1,100/month
	 	  	 Division Presidents and Executive Vice
 Presidents
	  	$1,100/month
	 	  	Senior Vice Presidents	  	$1,000/month
			
	Club Memberships and Dues	  	Chief Executive Officer	  	 Club Membership &
 $650/month dues
allowance

			
	 	  	Chief Operating Officer, Division Presidents and Executive Vice Presidents	  	 Club Membership &
 $650/month dues
allowance

			
	 	  	Senior Vice Presidents	  	Continued use of a Club Membership through 3/31/2005 & $650/month dues allowance
			
	 Sprint Long-Distance
 Telephone and PCS Service
(1)
	  	Board of Directors	  	 $6,000/year (continues after
 retirement for up to
120
 months) and use of two Sprint
 PCS
handsets

			
	 Sprint Long-Distance
 Telephone Service
(1)
	  	 Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Division Presidents, Executive
 and Senior Vice Presidents
	  	 Actual usage (continues after
 retirement)

			
	 Miscellaneous services
 (investment counseling, insurance
counseling, preparation of wills and trusts, tax counseling, income tax preparation, estate planning, and personal financial planning) (1)(2)
	  	 Chief Executive Officer
 Chief Operating Officer,
Division Presidents and Executive Vice Presidents
 Senior Vice Presidents
	  	 $15,000/year
 $12,000/year
  
  
 $10,000/year

			
	Executive Physical	  	 Chief Executive Officer
 Chief Operating Officer,
Division Presidents, Executive Vice Presidents and Senior Vice Presidents
	  	Reimbursement for Annual Physical Examination









					
	 Disability
	  	Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Division Presidents, Executive and Senior Vice Presidents	  	52 weeks at full base pay
			
	 Separation
	  	Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Division Presidents, Executive and Senior Vice Presidents (unless otherwise provided in an individual agreement with an officer)	  	1 year salary and benefits continuation plus lump sum bonus payment at conclusion of one year period equal to 80 percent of target opportunity
			
	 Fees
	  	Board of Directors	  	 Annual retainer - $50,000/ year
  
 Additional Annual retainer for Lead Director - $75,000/ year
  
 Committee Chair additional annual retainer
 Audit Committee $10,000

Other Committees $7,500
  
 Meeting Fee - $ 1,500/ meeting
  
 Committee
 Meeting Fee - $ 1,500/ meeting
  
 Fee for In-person meetings of Outside Directors and in-person business meetings attended on Sprint’s behalf - $ 1,500/ meeting




	*	This summary is effective beginning July 1, 2003. Before that date, benefits and fees were as described in Exhibit 10(e) to the 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003.



	(1)	Sprint reimburses for income taxes associated with these benefits. 


	(2)	With respect to tax years after 2002, Sprint’s independent auditor may not provide these services. 

  

 -2-
### §21507. Nonapplication of audit requirements

The audit requirements of section 10101 of this title do not apply to the corporation.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1296.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21507 | (no source). | |

Section

The section is added to except the American Hospital of Paris from the application of section 10101 of the revised title, restating 36:1101–1103, which imposes audit requirements on certain federally chartered corporations. The Hospital is not included in the list of corporations set out in 36:1101 to which the audit requirements apply.
### §30310. Service of process

The corporation shall have a designated agent in the District of Columbia to receive service of process for the corporation. Notice to or service on the agent, or mailed to the business address of the agent, is notice to or service on the corporation.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1319.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 30310 | 36:855(b). | Aug. 27, 1958, Pub. L. 85–769, §5(b), 72 Stat. 925. |

Section

The words "at all times", "authorized", and "deemed" are omitted as unnecessary and for consistency in the revised title. The words "service of process" are substituted for "service and process" for consistency in the revised title.
### §1802. Spina bifida conditions covered

This subchapter applies with respect to all forms and manifestations of spina bifida except spina bifida occulta.

(Added Pub. L. 104–204, title IV, §421(b)(1), Sept. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 2923; amended Pub. L. 106–419, title IV, §401(e)(1), Nov. 1, 2000, 114 Stat. 1860; Pub. L. 107–14, §8(b)(3), June 5, 2001, 115 Stat. 36.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1802 was renumbered section 3702 of this title.

#### Amendments

2001—Pub. L. 107–14 made technical amendment to directory language of Pub. L. 106–419. See 2000 Amendment note below.

2000—Pub. L. 106–419, as amended by Pub. L. 107–14, substituted "This subchapter" for "This chapter".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2001 Amendment

Pub. L. 107–14, §8(b), June 5, 2001, 115 Stat. 36, provided that the amendment made by section 8(b) is effective Nov. 1, 2000, and as if included in the Veterans Benefits and Health Care Improvement Act of 2000, Pub. L. 106–419, as enacted.

#### Effective Date of 2000 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 106–419 effective on the first day of the first month beginning more than one year after Nov. 1, 2000, see section 401(g) of Pub. L. 106–419, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1811 of this title.
#### § 880.202 Referral to Associate Director.

Any OPM office that receives information concerning the possibility that an annuitant might have disappeared will notify the Associate Director.
### §1132. Presumption of sound condition

For the purposes of section 1131 of this title, every person employed in the active military, naval, air, or space service for six months or more shall be taken to have been in sound condition when examined, accepted and enrolled for service, except as to defects, infirmities, or disorders noted at the time of the examination, acceptance and enrollment, or where evidence or medical judgment is such as to warrant a finding that the disease or injury existed before acceptance and enrollment.

(Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1122, §332; renumbered §1132 and amended Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), (c)(1), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 406; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, §926(a)(11), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3830.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 substituted "air, or space service" for "or air service".

1991—Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), renumbered section 332 of this title as this section.

Pub. L. 102–83, §5(c)(1), substituted "1131" for "331".
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# April 19, 2010 Onsite Observation Report for the Savannah River Site Saltstone Facility.

Accession Number: ML101460044

Date Released: Thursday, July 15, 2010

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML101660451 - April 19, 2010 Onsite Observation Report for the Savannah River Site Saltstone Facility. (8 page(s), 7/7/2010)
    - ML101900021 - DOE Incoming NRC Onsite Observation Disposal Unit 2 Tour Photos Presentation. (28 page(s), 7/9/2010)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### § 841.302 Definitions.

In this subpart—

*Employee* means an employee as defined in section 8401(11) of title 5, United States Code, and a Member as defined in section 8401(20) of title 5, United States Code. *Employee* includes a person who had applied for retirement under FERS but had not been separated from the service prior to his or her death even if the person's retirement would have been retroactively effective upon separation.

*FERS* means the Federal Employees Retirement System as described in chapter 84 of title 5, United States Code.

*MSPB* means the Merit Systems Protection Board described in chapter 12 of title 5, United States Code.

*Retiree* means a former employee or Member who is receiving recurring payments under FERS based on service by the employee or Member. *Retiree,* as used in this subpart, does not include a current spouse, former spouse, child, or person with an insurable interest receiving a survivor annuity. *Retiree* for purposes of determining a person's status at the time of death means that the person had been separated from the service and had met all the requirements to receive an annuity including having filed an application for the annuity prior to his or her death.

*Separated employee* means a former employee or Member who has been separated from the service but who has not met all the requirements for retirement under FERS or who has not filed an application for retirement under FERS.

*Survivor* means a person entitled to benefits under part 843 or 846 of this chapter based on the death of an employee, separated employee, retiree, or survivor.
U n i t e d S t a t e s G o v e r n m e n t F O R M 0-11SI (1-92)

M e m o r a n d u m R a i l r o a d R e t i r e m e n t b o a r d

Director of Retirement Benefits

L-95-34i

NOV 031995

TO

FROM : Steven A. Bartholow 

Deputy General Counsel 

Through: Catherine C. Cook

General Counsel fff

SUBJECT The Canadian National Railways Pension Plan

This is in response to your memorandum of July 26, 1995, requesting 

my opinion as to whether the above-referenced pension plan is a 

supplemental pension plan within the meaning of section 2(h)(2) of 

the Railroad Retirement Act. The plan covers all employees of 

Canadian National Railways. A similar plan (the CN Pension Plan of 

1959) was submitted and approved in 1967.

The pension plan is a defined benefit plan with definite provisions 

concerning participation, contributions, creditable service, 

vesting, retirement age, and benefits. The plan is funded by both 

employer and employee contributions. Although the plan has not 

been determined to be a qualified plan by the Internal Revenue 

Service, it is registered with Revenue Canada.

Section 216.42 of the Board's regulations defines a supplemental 

pension plan as a defined benefit plan and as a

(b) Defined contribution plan. A plan under which the 

employer is obligated to make fixed contributions to the 

plan regardless of profits (sometimes known as money 

purchase plan) is a private pension plan. A plan under 

which the employer's contributions are discretionary is 

not a private pension plan.

It is my opinion that the plan in question meets the requirements 

of section 216.42(b) and, thus, is a supplemental plan under 

section 2(h)(2). Benefits under the plan will reduce the 

supplemental annuity to the extent benefits are based upon employer 

contributions.
REGIONAL CORNER: SAKHA/YAKUTIYA

----
NUMBER 13-18-00030-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

MONICA MELISSA PATTERSON, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 370th District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

ORDER

Before Justices Benavides, Tijerina, and Silva

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on the Appellant’s motion for access to sealed 

records, namely volume 27 of the reporter’s record. On October 17, 2017, the date of the 

hearing, the trial court ordered the record of the hearing sealed.
2

Appellant now requests a copy of the sealed portion of the record to aid in the 

litigation of Appellant’s Writ of Habeas Corpus. Accordingly, we hereby GRANT the 

motion and order the Clerk of the Court to provide access to volumes 27 of the reporter’s 

record to the attorneys for the Appellant and State, if they should request it.

The State and Appellant’s counsel are ordered to abide by the sealing order of the 

trial court, and counsel is further ordered to treat the record as confidential and to 

safeguard it as a sealed record. Counsel is further ordered to maintain the confidentiality 

of the information contained in this sealed record and is prohibited from disseminating the 

sensitive information contained within the sealed record to any person other than for 

legitimate purposes related to Appellant’s Writ of Habeas Corpus.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

13th day of January, 2022.