alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2468

To amend the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century to modify 

a high priority project in the State of Michigan. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 12, 2003

Mr. STUPAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To amend the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century to modify a high priority project in the State of 

Michigan.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. HIGH PRIORITY PROJECT, MICHIGAN. 

4 Item number 1375 of the table contained in section 

5 1602 of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Cen6 tury (112 Stat. 307) is amended by striking ‘‘Prelimi7 nary’’ and all that follows through ‘‘Emmet County’’ and 

8 inserting ‘‘Petoskey area transportation needs study, and 

9 trunkline preservation and safety in the Petoskey area’’.

Æ
ACC CPI Safety & Health Training Through June 2011

May 2011 June 2011 Total Through June 2011

Job

Description Fully Complete Fully Complete Fully Complete InProgress

Instructor Online Instructor Online Instructor Online Started, not 

finished

Applicator 20 72 22 43 106 397 189

Helper 1 14 0 10 18 71 21

Other 14 100 0 113 99 648 283

Test Scores through June 2011 90-100% 70-89% <70%

Percent achieving test scores 72% 6.7% 22%

Other 14 100 0 113 99 648 283

Supervisor 1 45 0 23 99 274 237

Total 36 231 22 189 280 1390 730

Total Students Fully Completed 

Through June 2011

Total Students Started or Finished 

Through June 2011

1712 2442
### §6304. Veterans assistance offices

(a) In General.—The Secretary shall establish and maintain veterans assistance offices at such places throughout the United States and its territories and possessions, and in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, as the Secretary determines to be necessary to carry out the purposes of this subchapter. The Secretary may maintain such offices on such military installations located elsewhere as the Secretary, after consultation with the Secretary of Defense and taking into account recommendations, if any, of the Secretary of Labor, determines to be necessary to carry out such purposes.

(b) Location of Offices.—In establishing and maintaining such offices, the Secretary shall give due regard to—

(1) the geographical distribution of veterans recently discharged or released from active military, naval, air, or space service;

(2) the special needs of educationally disadvantaged veterans (including their need for accessibility of outreach services); and

(3) the necessity of providing appropriate outreach services in less populated areas.

(Added Pub. L. 109–233, title IV, §402(a), June 15, 2006, 120 Stat. 409; amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, §926(a)(60), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3830; Pub. L. 117–205, §2(b)(2), Oct. 17, 2022, 136 Stat. 2233.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 7723 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 109–233.

#### Amendments

2022—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 117–205 substituted "this subchapter" for "this chapter".

2021—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 116–283 substituted "air, or space service" for "or air service".
### §17. Same; limit of debate in each House

When the two Houses separate to decide upon an objection pursuant to section 15(d)(2)(C)(i) that may have been made to the counting of any electoral vote or votes from any State, or other question arising in the matter—

(1) all such objections and questions permitted with respect to such State shall be considered at such time;

(2) each Senator and Representative may speak to such objections or questions for up to five minutes, and not more than once;

(3) the total time for debate for all such objections and questions with respect to such State shall not exceed two hours in each House, equally divided and controlled by the Majority Leader and Minority Leader, or their respective designees; and

(4) at the close of such debate, it shall be the duty of the presiding officer of each House to put each of the objections and questions to a vote without further debate.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 644, 62 Stat. 676; Pub. L. 117–328, div. P, title I, §110(a), Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5240.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–328 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "When the two Houses separate to decide upon an objection that may have been made to the counting of any electoral vote or votes from any State, or other question arising in the matter, each Senator and Representative may speak to such objection or question five minutes, and not more than once; but after such debate shall have lasted two hours it shall be the duty of the presiding officer of each House to put the main question without further debate."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Mississippi River Commission

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

Mississippi River Commission.

# Time and Date:

1 p.m., December 15, 2004.

# Place:

Mississippi River Commission Headquarters Building, 1400 Walnut Street, Vicksburg, MS.

      ( print page 65657)    

# Status:

Open to the public for observation, but not for participation.

# Matters To Be Considered:

The Commission will consider the Louisiana Coastal Area Ecosystem Restoration Study, Final Report and Environmental Impact Statement.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Mr. Stephen Gambrell, telephone (601) 634-5766.

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 04-25391 Filed 11-10-04; 11:22 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-GX-M
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 222 (Thursday, November 18, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67596-67597]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25584]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Environmental Health 
Special Emphasis Panel; U01.
    Date: December 16, 2004.
    Time: 9:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Nat. Inst. of Environmental Health Sciences, Building 
101, Rodbell Auditorium, 111 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle 
Park, NC 27709.
    Contact Person: Linda K. Bass, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Research & Training, Nat. Institute of

[[Page 67597]]

Environmental Hlth., Sciences, P.O. Box 12233, MD EC-30, Research 
Triangle Park, NC 27709, 919/541-1307

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.115, 
Biometry and Risk Estimation--Health Risks from Environmental 
Exposures; 93.142, NIEHS Hazardous Waste Worker Health and Safety 
Training; 93.143, NIEHS Superfund Hazardous Substances--Basic 
Research and Education; 93.894, Resources and Manpower Development 
in the Environmental Health Sciences; 93.113, Biological Response to 
Environmental Health Hazards; 93.114, Applied Toxicological Research 
and Testing, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 10, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-25584 Filed 11-17-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 32.2
------------


                             STELLAR RESOURCES LTD.
                             OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Stellar  Resources  Ltd.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending April 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
Rezac,  Chief Executive  Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of our knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:  June 14, 2004                   /s/ Michael Rezac
                                        --------------------------------------
                                        Michael Rezac, Chief Financial Officer
§ 13.6 State selection of programs and activities. ( a ) A state may select any program or activity published in the Federal Register in accordance with § 13.3 of this part for intergovernmental review under these regulations. Each state, before selecting programs and activities, shall consult with local elected officials.
( b ) Each state that adopts a process shall notify the Secretary of the Department's programs and activities selected for that process.
( c ) A state may notify the Secretary of changes in its selections at any time. For each change, the state shall submit to the Secretary an assurance that the state has consulted with elected local elected officials regarding the change. The Department may establish deadlines by which states are required to inform the Secretary of changes in their program selections.
( d ) The Secretary uses a state's process as soon as feasible, depending on individual programs and activities, after the Secretary is notified of its selections.
NOVGOROD VELIKI: A GREAT OPPORTUNITY

----

**May 1998**
by Rachel Freeman
Novgorod is traditionally called "Veliki," the Great, in recognition of its role as a historic centerof Russian life and culture.  The historic title is gaining new luster as Novgorod is increasinglyrecognized as one of Russia's most attractive locations for foreign investment.  This recognitioncomes not only from U.S. and other foreign companies, which have invested more than $490million dollars in the region ($96 million in 1997), but also from the U.S. and Russiangovernments, which have designated Novgorod Oblast as a key focus for their "RegionalInvestment Initiative."
Novgorod the Great, a region of less than one million people previously known mainly for itshistory and monuments, regularly places in the top ten regions for trade and investment.  Thereason is not great mineral resources, nor a powerful industrial base   Novgorod has neither   butrather, the no-nonsense, pro-business attitude of its business and political leaders.
**Foreign Investment**
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS ADDED
BY


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Marco Community Bancorp, Inc.  (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “Report”), I, Richard Storm, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of and for the period covered by the
Report.




















Date:
            May 4, 2009
            
            By:
            /s/ Richard Storm, Jr.Richard
      Storm, Jr., Principal Executive
Officer
Editorial Note on Part 400
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 400 appear at 78 FR 69289, Nov. 19, 2013.

§ 400.33 Examiner's review—application to establish or modify a zone. An examiner assigned to review an application to establish, reorganize or expand a zone shall conduct a review taking into account the factors enumerated in § 400.26 and other appropriate sections of this part, which shall include: ( a ) Conducting or participating in hearings scheduled by the Executive Secretary;
( b ) Reviewing case records, including public comments;
( c ) Requesting information and evidence from parties of record;
( d ) Developing information and evidence necessary for evaluation and analysis of the application in accordance with the criteria of the Act and this part; and
( e ) Developing recommendations to the Board and submitting a report to the Executive Secretary, generally within 150 days of the close of the period for public comment (75 days for reorganizations under the ASF) (see § 400.32): ( 1 ) If the recommendations are unfavorable to the applicant, they shall be considered preliminary and the applicant shall be notified in writing (via electronic means, where appropriate) of the preliminary recommendations and the factors considered in their development. The applicant shall be given 30 days from the date of notification, subject to extensions upon request by the applicant, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, in which to respond to the recommendations and submit additional evidence pertinent to the factors considered in the development of the preliminary recommendations. Public comment may be invited on preliminary recommendations when warranted.
( 2 ) If the response contains new evidence on which there has been no opportunity for public comment, the Executive Secretary shall publish a notice in the Federal Register after completion of the review of the response. The new material shall be made available for public inspection and the Federal Register notice shall invite further public comment for a period of not less than 30 days, with an additional 15-day period for rebuttal comments.
( 3 ) If the factors considered for an examiner's recommendation(s) change as a result of new evidence, the applicable procedures of paragraphs (e)(1) and (2) of this section shall be followed.
( 4 ) When necessary, a request may be made to CBP to provide further comments, which shall be submitted within 45 days after the request.
[77 FR 12139, Feb. 28, 2012, as amended at 89 FR 8529, Feb. 8, 2024]
No. II-11-029 April 27, 2011

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 562-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 562-4487

 

NRC STAFF TO MEET WITH USEC TO DISCUSS PERFORMANCE 

AT PADUCAH GASEOUS DIFFUSION PLANT 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials have scheduled a meeting with officials of the 

United States Enrichment Corporation in Paducah, Ky., on Tuesday, May 10 to discuss the NRC=s 

latest review of regulatory safety performance at the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant.

The meeting is scheduled to begin at 7 p.m. CST in the meeting room of the McCracken 

County Library, 555 Washington St., in Paducah. Members of the public can attend and observe the 

discussion, and will have an opportunity to ask questions or make comments to the NRC staff after 

the business portion of the meeting.

The NRC’s evaluation of Paducah is called a Licensee Performance Review and covers the 

period of operation from Oct. 4, 2008 to Dec 31, 2010. 

The NRC staff evaluated performance at the Paducah plant in five major areas: Safety 

Operations, Safeguards, Radiological Controls, Facility Support and Special Topics. NRC officials 

said the review determined that the Paducah plant continued to conduct its activities in a safe 

manner, and the agency found no areas needing improvement. NRC inspection of the facility will

continue at its current level during the next 24-month review period. 

However, the NRC issued three Confirmatory Orders during the assessment period, related 

in part to enhancements to the plant’s safety conscious work environment. NRC officials said that, 

although the orders addressed issues that occurred before the assessment period, the agency will 

review the effectiveness of their implementation as a part of the core inspection program.

Interested persons may obtain a copy of the results of the review from the NRC Region II 

Office or from the NRC=s Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS), 

accessible from the NRC website at www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. The access number for 

the review is ML110660550.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov
Exhibit 32.1


          CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of East Penn Financial Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Brent L. Peters,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      o     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      o     To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
            presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial
            condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates
            and for the periods presented in the Report.



/s/ Brent L. Peters
------------------------------------------------------
Brent L. Peters, President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated:   May 10, 2005


                                    Page 26
Quincy Chrome Plating Operations Annual Emissions Inventory Report

Hours of Emissions

Source Internal Source Id Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total

Emission 

Factor lbs/hr

Pounds Em. 

/Year

101A Tanks 1-4 ME-1 200 180 410 400 360 370 390 380 500 500 440 340 4470 0.00678 30.31

101B Tank 5 ME-2 110 90 200 200 220 230 240 230 218 228 180 100 2246 0.00474 10.65

101C Tank 6 ME-3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.002 0.00

101D Tank 7 ME-4 120 100 200 200 230 230 240 230 218 218 178 120 2284 0.00054 1.23

101E Tank 8 ME-5 140 120 200 200 210 220 230 220 192 192 152 120 2196 0.00678 14.89

Total 

Emissions 57.07

2010
#### § 731.201 Standard.

The standard for a suitability action defined in § 731.203 and taken against an applicant, appointee, or employee is that the action will protect the integrity or promote the efficiency of the service.
#### Dennis Horgan, Respondent, v James Barnes, Doing Business as Track and Bat, et al., Appellants.

[822 NYS2d 474]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Samuel D. Hester, J), entered June 2, 2005 in a personal injury action. The order denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the second amended complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present — Kehoe, J.P., Gorski, Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.
No. IV-11-039

Contact: Victor Dricks (817) 860-8128

 Lara Uselding (817) 276-6519

 

 September 2, 2011 

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

NRC ISSUES CONFIRMATORY ACTION LETTER

FOR FORT CALHOUN RESTART PREPARATIONS

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a Confirmatory Action Letter 

documenting actions that Omaha Public Power District (OPPD) officials have agreed to take 

prior to restarting the Fort Calhoun nuclear plant.

The plant, located about 19 miles north of Omaha, Neb., has been shut down since April 

for a refueling outage. The outage was extended due to flooding along the Missouri River, which 

prompted operators to declare an Unusual Event on June 6. An electrical fire on June 7 also led 

to a declaration of an Alert and caused further restart complications. Both emergency 

declarations have been cancelled and the plant remains in a safe shutdown mode.

At a public meeting on July 27, OPPD officials discussed post flooding recovery actions 

and agreed not to restart the plant without NRC approval. They submitted a detailed plan to the 

NRC on August 10. 

“We intend to perform several comprehensive inspections to verify that the licensee has 

thoroughly evaluated the condition of key systems, structures and components at the plant before 

authorizing restart,” NRC Region IV Administrator Elmo E. Collins said.

“Based upon our review and discussions regarding your plans, we understand that OPPD 

commits to completing assessments and actions in six overall focus areas,” Collins said in a letter 

to OPPD officials. “These include: site restoration; plant systems and equipment; equipment 

reliability; design and licensing basis; emergency planning; and security.”

Each of these six areas are broken down into specific action items in 20 individual action 

plans. Each plan outlines action items required prior to heating up the reactor coolant system 

above 210 degrees Fahrenheit, actions prior to achieving criticality, and longer-term recovery 

actions.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125

Telephone: (817) 860-8128

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov
Copies of the confirmatory order will be posted on the NRC website. OPPD’s PostFlooding Recovery Action Plan is accessible through ADAMS using Accession Number 

ML112231755.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.