alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MEMORANDUM 

March 5, 2009 

To: F. Tanaka 

Via: K. Kunaniec 

From: T. Underwood 

Re: Outside Test OS-2733; November 4, 5 and 7, 2008 source test of 

emission point P-11 

Re: Outside Test OS-2734; November 4, 5 and 7, 2008 source test of 

emission point P-12 

Re: Outside Test OS-2735; October 22, 23 and 24, 2008 source test of 

emission point P-13 

Re: Outside Test OS-2736; October 22, 23 and 24, 2008 source test of 

emission point P-14 

Site No: A0051 

Plant No: 51; United Airlines 

Emission Pt: P-11 

Source No: S-16, S-17; Plating tanks 

Abated by: A-216, A-217; Dry scrubber with composite mesh pads 

Emission Pt: P-12 

Source No: S-18, S-19; Plating tanks 

Abated by: A-218, A-219; Dry scrubber with composite mesh pads 

Emission Pt: P-13 

Source No: S-20, S-21; Plating tanks 

Abated by: A-220, A-221; Dry scrubber with composite mesh pads 

Emission Pt: P-14 

Source No: S-22, S-23; Plating tanks 

Abated by: A-222, A-223; Dry scrubber with composite mesh pads 

A/C No: Title V 

Conditions: Reg. 11-8: plating limits based on mass rate emissions and/or yearly 

amperage 

 6465: Cr+6 0.006 mg/A-hr, 110 million amp-hours per year* 

 23187: Cr+6 0.03 mg/A-hr, 60 million amp-hours per year 

*Note: The Title V permit cites condition ID 6465 limiting Cr+6 emissions. 

Condition ID 23187 is not contained in the Title V permit, and is only 

found in Databank 

By: Blue Sky Environmental 

I have reviewed the four source test reports cited above and note the following: 

1) Source test was properly notified (NST-1537). 

2) I did not witness the tests. 

3) The testing appears to have been conducted by personnel who are 

familiar with proper source testing techniques. 

4) Quality assurance procedures were adequate to assure data integrity. 

5) Results of testing demonstrate these sources were in compliance with all 

of the conditions cited above. 

These sources were in compliance with District Regulations.
#### In the Matter of Thomas F. Kavanagh, Petitioner, against Paul Moss, as Commissioner of Licenses of the City of New York, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Townley, Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
**FREEDOM
        BANCSHARES, INC.**
 **AND
        SUBSIDIARY**


**EXHIBIT
      32.1**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Freedom
      Bancshares, Inc. (the “ Company ”)
      for
      the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 (the “ Periodic
      Report ”),
      the
      undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to Title 18, Section 1350 United States
      Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      to
      the best of his knowledge and belief, that the Periodic Report fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934 and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.





August
      15, 2005








/s/
      Vincent D.
      Cater


Vincent
      D. Cater


President
      and Chief Executive Officer






A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Freedom Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by Freedom Bancshares, Inc. and
      furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.





The
      information in this Exhibit 32.1 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### George Prowski, as Admininistrator, etc., Respondent, v. Erie Railroad Company, Appellant.

Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied, with ten dollars costs.
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1830 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 10DIV-C-6 7 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/13/20087:20:56

AM Sheet 101 of 232P. 2

i €s^\

UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y AN N ARBOR . MICHIGA N 4810 5 

# \n*f OFFIC E O F AI R AN D RADIATIO N 

## FE B I 6 198 8

Mr . Steve Shelto n Southern Californi a Servic e Statio n Associatio n 1675 0 Hal e Avenu e Irvine , Californi a 9271 4 Dea r Mr . Shelton : A s wa s discusse d during our telephon e conversatio n on Februar y8 , 198 8 we ar e intereste d i n coinin g t o Californi a t o observe th

e in-us e operatio n o f Phas e I I vapo r recover y equipmen t an

d woul d appreciat e you r hel p i n arranging for u s t o mee t wit h th

e appropriat e people . Our primaryinteres t i s i n visiting station s equippe d wit h balance-typ e system s i n orde r t o observe th

e customer' s interaction s wit h the equipmen t an d discus s the statio n owner' s experience s wit h vapo r recover y systems . I t woul d be helpfu l i f we coul d visi t bot h a ver y larg e statio n an

d a smal l independen t station . I t woul d als o be appreciate d i f yo u coul d arrang e fo r u s t o mee t wit h someon e involve d in the maintenanc e an d repai r o f vapo r recover y system s t o discus s the type s o f problem s an d malfunction s normall yassociate d with.thi s equipment . Ou r presen t plan s ar e t o be i n the Lo s Angele s are a Marc h 8t h an d 9t h for the abov e mentione d purposes . W e woul d appreciat e your hel p i n arranging our visits . I wil l be contacting yo u shortl yconcerning the specifics

- o f ou r trip . Than k yo u ver

ymuc h for your cooperation .



### Sincerely , 

# /I ' 4 fU!l</ Joh n Muelle r Standard s Developmen t an d Suppor t Branc h cc : Docke t A-87-1 1
| **Gear envy**Our editors think they've spotted the hottest-looking new products, but do you think that gear is worthy of hype? Vote now.**Read more** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| **Personal Tech Radar****Speaker systems and the sexes**What do women want? What do men want? (Hint: Not the same things.)**Read more** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| **Digital home**Room-by-room advice for a cutting-edge abode.**Read more**                                                              |   | **Three I can't live without**Real CNET readers show off their must-have tech gear.**Read more** |
Exhibit 11

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 

as Adopted Pursuant to 

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of W Candy, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Brian Shenkman, as Chief Executive Officer and as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, respectively, that: 

 

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

August 12, 2003       

By Brian Shenkman
/s/ Brian Shenkman

President, CEO, CFO

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to W Candy, Inc. and will be retained by W Candy, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 6514

JERMAINE L. COBBS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. WARDEN OF GOODMAN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Orangeburg

. Margaret B. Seymour , Senior District Judge. ( 5:20

- cv - 00818

- MBS )

Submitted : August 24, 2021, Decided: August 27, 2021

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Jermaine L. Cobbs, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jermaine L. Cobbs seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Cobbs’ 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253( c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrat ing that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demon strate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Cobbs has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

# AGENCY:

Rural Telephone Bank, USDA. 

# ACTION:

Staff briefing for the board of directors.

*Time and Date:*                     2 p.m., Thursday, February 12, 2004.                 

*Place:*                     Fountainebleau Hilton Resort, 4441 Collins Ave., Miami Beach, FL 33140, Conference Room 1.                 

*Status:*                     Open.                 

*Matters To Be Discussed:*

1. Fiscal Year 2003 Audit. 

2. Broadband Program update. 

3. Privatization discussion. 

4. Administrative and other issues. 

# ACTION:

Board of Directors meeting. 

*Time and Date:*                         9 a.m., Friday, February 13, 2004.                     

*Place:*                         Fountainebleau Hilton Resort, 4441 Collins Ave., Miami Beach, FL 33140, Imperial V Board Room.                     

*Status:*                         Open.                     

*Matters To Be Considered:*                         The following matters have been placed on the agenda for the Board of Directors meeting:                     

1. Call to order. 

2. Action on Minutes of the November 14, 2003, board meeting. 

3. Secretary's Report on loans approved. 

4. Treasurer's Report. 

5. Report on loan rescissions. 

6. Discussion on Privatization Study and issuance of Request for Proposal. 

7. Discussion on retirement of Class A stock. 

8. Governor's Remarks. 

9. Adjournment. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Roberta D. Purcell, Assistant Governor, Rural Telephone Bank, (202) 720-9554. 

Dated: February 2, 2004. 

Hilda Legg, 

Governor, Rural Telephone Bank. 

[FR Doc. 04-2557 Filed 2-2-04; 4:59 pm] 

BILLING CODE 3410-15-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-20623 Conference Calendar

RICHARD ANTHONY SALAZAR, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus LT. MOORE; CAPT. ALBERTO; BOBBY STRICKLEN; TOMMY THOMAS, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-99-CV-4115

-------------------- June 19, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Richard Anthony Salazar, Texas inmate #897679, proceeding

pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”), appeals the district court’s dismissal as frivolous, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We review a dismissal as frivolous for an abuse of discretion. Black v. Warren , 134 F.3d 732, 734 (5th Cir. 1998). Salazar’s contentions concerning the alleged denial of adequate medical treatment do not constitute deliberateNo. 01-20623 -2- indifference. See Gibbs v. Grimmette , 254 F.3d 545, 548-49 & n.2 (5th Cir. 2001), cert. denied , 122 S. Ct. 1083 (2002). Salazar’s assertions constitute disagreement with the treatment that he received and are not actionable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Grimmette , 254 F.3d at 548-49. Salazar has not complied with F ED . R. A PP . P. 28 and has not briefed sufficiently his claim concerning his confinement in lockdown. See Grant v. Cuellar , 59 F.3d 523, 524-25 (5th Cir. 1995); Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, he has abandoned the issue. Grant , 59 F.3d at 524- 25; Yohey , 985 F.2d at 224-25. We review Salazar’s contentions, raised for the first time, that he was confined in a filthy and insect-infested cell, he was handcuffed and shackled during visitation, and he was denied contact with others and access to outside world activities for plain error only. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n , 79 F.3d 1415, 1428 (5th Cir. 1996) ( en banc ). Resolution of these issues would require factual findings, and factual issues which are capable of resolution by the district court cannot rise to the level of plain error. United States v. Vital , 68 F.3d 114, 119 (5th Cir. 1995); Gabel v. Lynaugh , 835 F.2d 124, 125 (5th Cir. 1988). Salazar’s appeal is without arguable merit and is DISMISSED as frivolous. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2; Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). The district court’s dismissal of Salazar’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous and the dismissal of the instant appeal as frivolous count as two strikesNo. 01-20623 -3- under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). We caution Salazar that once he accumulates three strikes, he may not proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# August 2010 Report on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206.

Accession Number: ML102510120

Date Released: Monday, September 20, 2010

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML102440212 - August 2010 Report On The Status Of Public Petitions Under Title 10 Of The Code Of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206. (2 page(s), 9/15/2010)
    - ML102440271 - Enclosure - August 2010 Report on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206. (20 page(s), 9/15/2010)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 20 (Wednesday, January 30, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 479-480]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00279]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Integrative, Functional and Cognitive 
Neuroscience Integrated Review Group; Neuroendocrinology, 
Neuroimmunology, Rhythms and Sleep Study Section.
    Date: February 12-13, 2019.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bahia Resort Hotel, 998 West Mission Bay Drive, San 
Diego, CA 92109.

[[Page 480]]

    Contact Person: Michael Selmanoff, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5164, MSC 7844, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-435-1119, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#543927313839353a3b3232143727267a3a3d3c7a333b22"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cda0bea8a1a0aca3a2abab8daebebfe3a3a4a5e3aaa2bb">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in 
advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of 
December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 23, 2019.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-00279 Filed 1-29-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 16.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to establish procedures under which a voluntary consumer product information labeling program administered by the Department of Commerce will function.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# May 2010 Report on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206.

Accession Number: ML101470304

Date Released: Friday, June 25, 2010

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML101470092 - May 2010 Report on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206. (3 page(s), 6/18/2010)
    - ML101470093 - Enclosures 1 and 2 of the May 2010 Report on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206. (23 page(s), 6/18/2010)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
§ 25.22 Exchange of witness lists, statements, and exhibits. ( a ) At least 15 days before the hearing or at such other time as may be ordered by the ALJ, the parties shall exchange witness lists, copies of prior statements of proposed witnesses, and copies of proposed hearing exhibits, including copies of any written statements that the party intends to offer in lieu of live testimony in accordance with § 25.33(b). At the time the above documents are exchanged, any party that intends to rely on the transcript of deposition testimony in lieu of live testimony at the hearing, if permitted by the ALJ, shall provide each party with a copy of the specific pages of the transcript it intends to introduce into evidence.
( b ) If a party objects, the ALJ shall not admit into evidence the testimony of any witness whose name does not appear on the witness list or any exhibit not provided to the opposing party as provided above unless the ALJ finds good cause for the failure or that there is no prejudice to the objecting party.
( c ) Unless another party objects within the time set by the ALJ, documents exchanged in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section shall be deemed to be authentic for the purpose of admissibility at the hearing.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Sirrom Leasing Co., Inc., Respondent-Appellant, against William E. Boyland et al., Constituting the Tax Commission of the City of New York, Appellants-Respondents. [342-348 Seventh Avenue, Borough of Manhattan.]

Order unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Bergan, JJ. [See 283 App. Div. 659.]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Juan E. Ortiz, Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 545]

Motion for reargument denied. Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Gorski, Green and Pine, JJ.
NRC ANNOUNCES AVAILABILITY OF LICENSE APPLICATION FOR

ROSS URANIUM RECOVERY PROJECT IN WYOMING 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has made available on its website an application by 

Strata Energy, Inc., for a license to construct and operate the Ross In Situ Uranium Recovery 

Project in Crook County, Wyo. The agency will soon announce the opportunity to request an 

adjudicatory hearing on the license.

Strata submitted the Ross application Jan. 4. The NRC staff has determined that the 

application contains sufficient information for the agency to formally "docket," or file, the 

application and begin its technical and environmental reviews. Docketing the application does 

not preclude requesting additional information as the reviews proceed; nor does it indicate 

whether the Commission will grant the application.

The deadline for requesting a hearing is 60 days following publication of a notice in the 

Federal Register, expected shortly. By that date, petitions must be filed by anyone whose interest 

may be affected by the license application and who wishes to participate as a party in the 

proceeding. The notice includes detailed instructions for requesting a hearing through the NRC’s 

E-filing system’s electronic submittal page. For specific guidance and instructions visit the 

public involvement in hearings Web page.

Strata’s Ross application is available through the NRC’s ADAMS online database by 

using Accession Number ML110120063. Documents relating to the application can be found by 

searching for Docket Number 04009091. Information about the NRC’s licensing and regulation 

of uranium recovery facilities, including a page with information about the Ross application, is 

available on the agency’s website. 

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC’s website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-121 June 30, 2011