alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 200.112 Reports. ( a ) Results of calibrations and other tests are issued to the customer as formal reports entitled, “National Institute of Standards & Technology Report of Calibration,” “National Institute of Standards & Technology Report of Test,” or “National Institute of Standards & Technology Report of Analysis,” as appropriate. Copies are not supplied to other parties except under applicable Federal law. Whenever formal certification is required by law, or to meet special conditions adjudged by NIST to warrant it, a letter will be provided certifying that the particular item was received and calibrated or tested, and identifying the report containing the results.
( b ) NIST reports of calibration generally include in sentence form a statement of the uncertainty attached to the numerical values reported. Limits of uncertainty usually comprise an estimate of systematic error plus a value of imprecision. Details on how these estimates are arrived at are in many cases included in the calibration report. Additional information may be found in SP 250.
( c ) The NIST practice is to express data given in calibration or test reports in the SI or International System of Units. The International System of Units (SI) was defined and given official status by the 11th General Conference of Weights and Measures, 1960. A complete listing of SI units is presented in detail in NIST SP 330. The NIST will express data in SI units unless this makes communication excessively complicated. For example, commercial gage designations, commonly used items identified by nominal dimensions, or other commercial nomenclatures or devices (such as drill sizes, or commercial standards for weights and measures) expressed in customary units are an exception from this practice. However, even in such instances, when practical and meaningful, SI and customary units may be given in parallel. Users of NIST calibration services may specify the units to be used in the calibration, especially for commercial devices and standards using customary units or units having some legal definition.
Additional SABIT Funds

----
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Fred C. Martz, Deceased. Dora Martz, Appellant; Elmer Martz et al., Respondents.

All concur. (Appeal from an order granting the application of the executors in determining a limited right of election to the widow of decedent, and denying to said widow full right of election.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ.
REMARKS OF CHAIRMAN GREGORY B. JACZKO AT COMMISSION BRIEFING 

ON URANIUM RECOVERY REGULATION 

 Good morning. We will be focusing on the licensing review of new uranium recovery 

facilities during today’s Commission meeting. 

 We need look no further than this country’s experience with uranium mining and milling 

activities in the early years of nuclear power to appreciate the importance of regulatory oversight 

on these issues. Many of those sites are dealing with significant environmental challenges – 

notably groundwater contamination – that may take years, or even decades, to resolve. 

 It is this area in particular that puts environmental protection in the agency’s mission. 

Regulation of uranium recovery facilities is an important part of our effort to protect public 

health and safety – and the environment. 

 Today, the increased price for uranium has spurred a lot more interest in new uranium 

recovery facilities and restarting existing ones. 

 We’re in the process of strengthening our licensing and oversight programs, and have 

taken approaches that we think will be efficient and effective. The development of the Generic 

Environmental Impact Statement is one example of that. This kind of pro-active planning helps 

us make the best use of our resources, and is critical to our effectiveness as a regulator. 

 But, in the end, public health and safety and environmental protection are our mandate. 

 The Commission will hear from three panels this morning. The NRC staff will get us 

started by briefing the Commission on several issues, including the status of new applications. 

During our second panel, officials from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of 

Land Management will discuss the status of their related activities. Lastly, the Commission will 

hear from a diverse panel of stakeholders, which includes state government regulators and 

advocacy representatives. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-040 March 2, 2010
### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-77,090-01

EX PARTE MILTON DWAYNE GOBERT

ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. D-1-DC-06-904006-A IN THE 331 DISTRICT COURT

ST

TRAVIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

This is a post conviction application for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to the

provisions of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 11.071.

Applicant was convicted in March 2010 of capital murder committed in October 2003.

TEX. PENAL CODE § 19.03(a). Based on the jury’s answers to the special issues set forth in

the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 37.071, sections 2(b) and 2(e), the trial court
Gobert - 2

sentenced him to death. Art. 37.071, § 2(g). This Court affirmed applicant’s conviction and

1

sentence on direct appeal. Gobert v. State, No. AP-76,345 (Tex. Crim. App. Nov. 23,

2011)(not designated for publication).

Applicant presented twelve allegations in his application in which he challenges the

validity of his conviction and sentence. The trial court did not hold a live evidentiary

hearing. As to all of these allegations, the trial judge entered findings of fact and conclusions

of law and recommended that relief be denied.

This Court has reviewed the record with respect to the allegations made by Applicant.

We agree with the trial judge’s recommendation and adopt the trial judge’s findings and

conclusions. Based upon the trial court’s findings and conclusions and our own review of

the record, relief is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 14 DAY OF JANUARY, 2014.

TH

Publish/Do Not Publish

 Unless otherwise indicated, all references to Articles are to the Texas Code of Criminal 1

Procedure.
#### Kalman I. Nulman’s Appeal from Probate Kalman I. Nulman *v.*Joseph Weill

*William A. Phillips*and *James F. Stapleton,*in support of the petition.

*JohnR. Whelan,*assistant attorney general, *and Paul J. Pacifico,*in opposition.

Decided March 10, 1988

The petition by the plaintiff and the defendants The Daphne Seybolt Culpeper Foundation, Inc., et al. for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 13 Conn. App. 811, is denied.
### [§410. Renumbered §480]
No. IV-10-038 

Contact: Victor Dricks: (817) 860-8128 

 Lara Uselding: (817) 276-6519 

 

 November 17, 2010 

 E-Mail: 0HOPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

NRC NAMES NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR 

AT COOPER NUCLEAR STATION

 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has selected Jeff 

Josey as the new senior resident inspector at the Cooper nuclear power 

plant which is located 23 miles south of Nebraska 

City, Neb. 

 “Jeff Josey’s technical and regulatory experience will assist the 

NRC in carrying out its mission of protecting people and the 

environment and ensuring the safe operation of nuclear power plants,” 

said NRC Region IV Administrator Elmo E. Collins. 

Mr. Josey joined the NRC in August 2004 as an engineering inspector in Region I. Most 

recently he was a resident inspector at the Arkansas Nuclear One power plant located near 

Russellville, Ark. Prior to joining the agency he worked as a nuclear operator onboard 

submarines in the U.S. Navy for 13 years. Mr. Josey holds a master’s degree in nuclear 

engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. 

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant site has at least two NRC resident inspectors. 

Mr. Josey joins resident inspector Mike Chambers, who has been assigned at Cooper since 2007. 

They serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections and monitoring 

significant work projects. 

The Cooper Nuclear Station resident inspectors can be reached at: (402) 825-3371. 

### 

 NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125 

Telephone: (817) 860-8128
#### Katharine Cibiniak et al., Appellants, *v.*Franklin Properties, Inc., Respondent.

*Per Guriam.*

The complaint appears to have been dismissed at the end of

the plaintiffs’ ease solely on the testimony of one of plaintiffs’ witnesses who testified that he had not observed any defect in the ceiling between the time it was last repaired and the time of the accident. Any conflict in evidence that might have resulted by that testimony was a matter for the jury to resolve. *(Ochs*v. *Wood,*221 N. Y. 335.) We find upon an examination of the record that sufficient evidence was adduced by the plaintiffs to establish a prima facie case and that the motion to dismiss the complaint should not have t een granted.

Since a new trial is to be had it is well to point out that the trial court should not have permitted the defendant’s counsel to question one of the plaintiffs as to the workmen’s compensation payments she had received. *(Regan*v. *Frontier Elevator & Mill Co.,*211 App. Div. 164.)

The judgment appealed from should therefore be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event.

Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Van Voorhis, JJ., concur.

Judgment unanimously reversed and a neiv trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event.
REGIONAL CORNER: SAMARKAND, UZBEKISTAN

----

**March 1999**
By Umida Khaknazar
The Samarkand Region of Uzbekistan is the second largest industrial and agricultural center in the country. Theregion is home to over 7,000 enterprises and has been actively working to reform its market infrastructure to facilitateincreased business activity and foreign investment. In addition to being an economic force in Uzbekistan, Samarkandis a major tourism draw, with a number of well preserved monuments and Silk Road era sites.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2372 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2372

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an increased low-
  income housing credit for property located immediately adjacent to 
                        qualified census tracts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 5, 2003

 Mr. Lewis of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Rangel, Ms. Carson of Indiana, 
Mr. Owens, Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas, Mr. Towns, Mr. Kleczka, Mr. Scott 
of Georgia, Mr. Paul, Mr. Frost, Mr. Payne, and Mr. Kildee) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 
                                 Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an increased low-
  income housing credit for property located immediately adjacent to 
                        qualified census tracts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Low Income Housing Extension Act of 
2003''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN CREDIT FOR LOW-INCOME HOUSING.

    (a) In General.--Clause (ii) of section 42(d)(5)(C) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to increase in credit for buildings in 
high cost areas) is amended by adding at the end the following:
                                    ``(IV) Contiguous property.--For 
                                purposes of clause (i), property which 
                                is contiguous to a qualified census 
                                tract and which meets the criteria and 
                                preferences of a qualified allocation 
                                plan (as defined in subsection 
                                (m)(1)(B)), as determined by the 
                                appropriate housing credit agency, 
                                shall be treated as if such property is 
                                located in a qualified census tract.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to property placed in service after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
ONLINE REGISTRATION OPEN FOR FUEL CYCLE INFORMATION EXCHANGE, 

JUNE 7-8 IN ROCKVILLE, MD.

Online registration is open for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s 6th Annual Fuel 

Cycle Information Exchange (FCIX), to be held June 7-8 in Rockville, Md.

The theme for this year’s FCIX is “Collaboration and Information Sharing in the Nuclear 

Fuel Cycle.” Topics include emergency preparedness and incident response; inspection and 

oversight of fuel cycle facilities; licensing and regulatory issues; security and safeguards; and 

long-term storage and reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel.

The FCIX will run from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. each day, at the Legacy Hotel and Meeting 

Centre, 1775 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md. More information about the conference, including

online registration, is available on the NRC website at http://www.nrc.gov/publicinvolve/conference-symposia/fcix.html. 

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-069 April 25, 2011
### **CHAPTER 181—TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACCESSIBILITY FOR HEARING-IMPAIRED AND SPEECH-IMPAIRED INDIVIDUALS**

Sec.
18101.
Definitions.
18102.
Federal telecommunications system.
18103.
Research and development.
18104.
TTY installation by Congress.
#### In the Matter of the Application of H. Don Reynolds for Admission to Practice as an Attorney. (From the State of Illinois.)

Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(a) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 23rd day of April, 2010.









/s/ Merrill W. ShermanMerrill W. ShermanPresident and Chief Executive Officer













A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc. and will be retained by Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of Boykin C. Wright, Petitioner, against Charles E. Ransom et al., Constituting the Town Board of the Town of Oyster Bay, Nassau County, Respondents.

By petition, dated April 1, 1952, under section 348 of the Village Law, 36 of 286 residents, the owners of a majority of the property in value of two certain parcels, asked for annexation of the territory to the Village of Muttontown, Nassau County. At the hearing before the Town Board of Oyster Bay, no written objections to the proposition for annexation were filed, no one appeared in opposition thereto, and no testimony was taken. On April 29,1952, the town board refused to give its consent to the petition. The reasons stated by the town board for its refusal were that: (1) the members of the board may challenge the sufficiency of the petition even in the absence of written objections; (2) the boundaries of the territory intended to be annexed are vaguely described in the petition; (3) the persons signing the petition did not *954constitute a majority of the persons residing within the territory, qualified to vote for town officers; (4) the exclusion of certain territory between the two parcels of property sought to be annexed would leave the omitted area isolated from the rest of the town in virtual governmental isolation; (5) it would not be in the best interests of the town to grant the application for annexation. This article 78 proceeding, brought by one of the signers of the petition for annexation to review the determination of the town board, has been transferred to this court pursuant to section 1296 of the Civil Practice Act. Determination annulled, without costs, and application granted directing respondents to execute consent to the petition, as required by section 348 of the Village Law, without costs. While the members of the town board may consider objections to the petition for annexation even in the absence of written objections by others, the objections which may be raised must be confined to the four mentioned in subdivision 2 of section 348 of the Village Law. In our opinion, where the petition is signed by one of the majorities mentioned in the statute, the fact that it is not signed by the other or that there is opposition from the other majority is immaterial. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Mae Crate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., concur.
No. IV-11-016

Contact: Victor Dricks (817) 860-8128

 Lara Uselding (817) 276-6519

 

April 26, 2011 

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD OPEN HOUSE TO DISCUSS 2010 PERFORMANCE

OF ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold an open house in Russellville, Ark., on 

May 4, to provide information on the agency’s 2010 assessment of the safety performance for the 

Arkansas Nuclear One nuclear plant. The plant, located in Russellville, is operated by Entergy 

Operations, Inc.

The open house will begin at 6 p.m. at the Lake Point Conference Center, 61 Lake Point 

Lane, Russellville, Ark. There will be no formal presentation by NRC at the open house. Members 

of the public will have an opportunity to meet informally with the NRC staff, ask questions and 

learn about the agency’s role in ensuring safe plant operation.

“The NRC continually reviews the performance of Arkansas Nuclear One and the nation’s 

other commercial nuclear power facilities,” NRC Region IV Administrator Elmo E. Collins said. 

“This informal meeting will provide members of the public with an opportunity to learn about our 

annual assessment of safety performance at the plant.”

The NRC said Arkansas One operated safely during 2010 and will receive the detailed 

inspection regime during 2011 that is used by the NRC for plants that are operating well. These 

inspections are performed by NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant and by inspection 

specialists from the Region IV Office in Arlington, Texas.

A letter sent from the NRC Region IV office to plant officials addresses the performance of 

the plant during 2010 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the 

NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/ano_2010q4.pdf.

Current performance information for Arkansas Nuclear One Unit 1 is available on the

NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/ANO1/ano1_chart.html.

Current performance information for Unit 2 is available at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/ANO2/ano2_chart.html.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125

Telephone: (817) 860-8128

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov
No. I-10-028 

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331 

May 21, 2010 

E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

NRC ISSUES INSPECTION REPORT 

ON VERMONT YANKEE GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION ISSUES 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued its inspection report on 

groundwater contamination issues at the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant, which is located 

in Vernon (Windham County), Vt., and operated by Entergy Nuclear. 

The focus of the inspection was Entergy’s response to the leakage of radioactive liquid 

into groundwater at the site identified earlier this year, as well as the company’s implementation 

of the Groundwater Protection Initiative (GPI) instituted by the nuclear power industry in 2007. 

In the report, the NRC staff states that its extensive reviews have found that Entergy took prompt 

and effective action to identify the source of the leakage, halt it and develop an effective plan to 

address any resulting groundwater contamination. However, with respect to the GPI, the NRC 

staff found that some voluntary aspects of the initiative were not completed at Vermont Yankee. 

 

“Based on the results of this inspection, the NRC determined that Entergy-Vermont 

Yankee (ENVY) appropriately evaluated the contaminated groundwater with respect to off-site 

effluent release limits and the resulting radiological impact to public health and safety; and that 

ENVY complied with all applicable regulatory requirements and standards pertaining to 

radiological effluent monitoring, dose assessment, and radiological evaluation,” the report states. 

“No violations of NRC requirements or findings of significance were identified.” 

The affected groundwater at Vermont Yankee is not used for drinking-water purposes. 

With respect to any groundwater from the site migrating to the nearby Connecticut River, a 

calculation performed by Entergy – and independently verified by the NRC – estimated a dose of 

0.000035 millirems of maximum exposure to members of the public from contaminated 

groundwater reaching the waterway. A millirem is a measure of exposure to radiation. The 

average American is exposed to about 620 millirems of radiation each year from natural and 

manmade sources. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region I 

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov
The NRC continues to closely monitor and assess Entergy’s investigation, conclusions, 

and remedial actions to resolve condition. The NRC will continue to verify that the plant meets 

the rigid standards set by federal authorities. 

A copy of the report will be available on the NRC web site at; 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/listofrpts_body.html . 

 #