T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T HE C T ORE NR I QU E AL F AR OF ON S E C A, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 10- 71693 A ge nc yN o. A 094- 948- 401 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d Jul y12, 2011 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , A L A R C Ó N , an dL E A V Y , C i rcu i tJu d g es. H e c t orE nr i que A l f

ar o- F ons e c a , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s ( “ I J ” ) de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s appl i c a t i on f orc anc e l l a t i on of re m ov al . W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew for s ub st ant i al 

# FI LED JU L 21 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 71693 2 ev i d en ce th e ag en cy’ s factu al fi n d i n g s, L o p ez -A lv a ra do v . A s h c r o ft , 381 F . 3d 847, 8 5 0 - 5 1 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) , an df o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f am o tio n to cont i nu e, B arapi nd v . R e no , 225 F . 3d 1100, 1113 ( 9th C i r . 2000) . W e de nythe p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. S ubs t ant i a l e vi de nc e s upport s the a ge nc y ’ s a dve r s e c r e di bi l i tyf i ndi ng be c aus e A l f

ar o- F ons e c a ’ s t e s t i m onyr e gar di ng hi s m ul t i pl e de partur e s f r om the U n ite dS ta te s w a s m a te r ia llyin c o n s is te n t w ith th e s in g le d e p artu r e lis te do n h is ap p lic a tio n . See Shres tha v. H older , 5 9 0 F .3 d1 0 3 4 - 1 0 3 9 - 1 0 4 4 ( d e ta ilin g th is C o u rt’s R E A L I D a d v e r s e c r e d ib ilitys tan d ar d s ) ; c f . Ve ra - Vi l leg a s v . I

NS , 330 F . 3d 1222, 1231- 34 ( 9th C i r . 2003) . B e c aus e A l f ar o- F ons e c a ’ s t e s t i m onyw a s not cr edi bl e and he di d n otprov i de suff i ci entsupp ort i ng do cum ent at i on of hi s physi ca l pres ence i n the U ni t ed S t at es du ri ng the st atut ory t i m e per i od , subst ant i alevi dence s upport s the a ge nc y ’ s de t e rm i na t i on tha the di d notm e e thi s bur de n of e s t abl i s hi ng c o n tin u o u s p h y s ic a l p r e s e n c e . See 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 2 9 b ( b ) ( 1 ) ( A ) . T he I Jdi d notabus e hi s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng ac ont i nua nc e on the gr ound th a t A lf a r o - F o n s e c ad idn o t d e m o n s tr a te g o o dc au s e . See 8 C . F . R . § 1 00 3. 29 (an IJ m a yg r a n t am o tio n f

o rc o n tin u an c e f

o rg o o dc au s e s h o w n ) . A l f ar o- F ons e c a ’ s r e m a i ni ng c ont e nt i ons a r e una va i l i ng. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.