alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 20 (Wednesday, January 30, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 487]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00307]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Musculoskeletal, Oral and Skin Sciences 
Integrated Review Group; Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Sciences 
Study Section.
    Date: February 14, 2019.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Drury Inn & Suites River Walk, 201 North St. Mary's 
Street, San Antonio, TX 78205.
    Contact Person: Maria Nurminskaya, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-1222, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e8869d9a8581869b8389918985a88b9b9ac6868180c68f879e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="39574c4b5450574a5258405854795a4a4b17575051175e564f">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in 
advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of 
December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 24, 2019.
Ronald J. Livingston, Jr.,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-00307 Filed 1-29-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Lewis *&*Murphy Realty, Inc., Respondent, v. Alfred Fischler et al., Individually and as Copartners Trading under the Name of Atlas Service Station No. 3, et al., Appellants.

Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Silver Star Energy,  Inc. on
Form 10-QSB for the period  ending June 30, 2007,  as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Robert McIntosh,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/    Robert McIntosh
Robert McIntosh
President, CEO and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


August 20, 2007


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Powers v. Powers.

May 18, 1948.

Glenn H. Stephens for appellant.

R. L. Brown and Joe S. Feather for appellee.

Opinion of the Court by

Van Sant, Commissioner

Affirming.

Appellant filed this action for divorce against appellee, requesting a restoration of certain properties. Appellee counterclaimed and prayed “that she be given *476judgment in the sum of $500.00 for her share of the allotment” allegedly made to her and her husband by a son during his service in the armed forces in World War II; and “that she be adjudged the owner of the farm (described in the petition) and for an equitable sum for her support while living apart from the plaintiff.” The Chancellor granted a divorce to appellant, and adjudged each to be the owner of an undivided one-half interest in the farm, as well as the livestock and farm implements thereon. Appellant contends that the Court erred in failing to restore to him all of the property which he claims was conveyed to appellee by reason of their marriage. Appellee has cross-appealed, contending that the farm was not conveyed to her in consideration of the marriage, but was conveyed for valuable consideration, viz., to settle marital troubles with which they were faced in the year 1916. The sole question for our determination is whether the Court erred in dividing the property equally between the parties.

The uncontradicted evidence shows appellee to have been at fault in bringing about the marital difficulties; therefore, the Chancellor correctly granted appellant a divorce. The parties were married in the year 1907, and lived together approximately thirty-eight years. The evidence shows that appellee bore twelve children, nine of whom are living at this time. The farm in question was inherited by appellant from his parents; but appellee worked in the field, yearly made a garden, kept house, cared for the children, and performed all of the household duties in making a home for the family. The farm consists of approximately eighty acres of hillside land, and variously is estimated to be worth between $800 and $1500. Appellee inherited some money from her parents, which she has preserved in a bank account. Apparently the parties have had trouble since the inception of their marriage; but it is manifest from the evidence that, without the contribution of labor which appellee has made to this union, appellant would not have been able to preserve the farm in question or the livestock or implements which the Chancellor has divided as equally as passible. Under these circumstances, we are of the opinion that appellee has contributed to what little estate the parties now are in possession of *477to such an extent that she should be adjudged to be the owner of one-half thereof.

We are of the opinion under the evidence that the allotment made to appellant by the son of the parties was used for the joint benefit of the parties, and that appellant should not be required further to account to appellee for her portion of the allotment.

Since the judgment of the Court conforms to this opinion, it hereby is affirmed.
Lamar County Courthouse 119 N. Main Street Paris, TX 75460 

### ERIC S. CLIFFORD DISTRICT JUDGE or P.O. Box 1118 Paris, TX 75461 Sixth Judicial District Court Presiding in Lamar & Red River County, Texas October 28, 2015

Court ofCriminal Appeals P.O. Box 12308, Capitol Station Austin, TX 78711 Re: Orian Lee Scott 

## ReCEIVED IN COUIU OF CRIMINALAPPEALS 

## NOV 02 

## 2015 Abet

## Acosta,Clerk

WR-83,185-07, -08, -09, -10, -11 & -12

# ~~~ 

# HbS- 

# m- 1

# oe



# -oq 1 \, 

# 0I

# \\I 

# \2- (903) 737-2431 fax (903) 784-7857

C> n --1.

The Court respectfully requestsan extension oftime within which to complete and file Findings of Fact and Conclusions ofLaw on the six (6) cases referenced above. The Court does not anticipate that it will take more than 30 days from this date to comply with the required filings. Your consideration for this extension and your assistance is**appr~ciated.** Respectfully, Eric S. Clifford
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

SCOTT SNYDER, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

GEORGE M. THOMAS III, EXECUTOR 

OF THE ESTATE OF GEORGE M. 

THOMAS, JR., ALSO KNOWN AS 

GEORGE THOMAS, DECEASED, AND 

GEORGE M. THOMAS III, EXECUTOR 

OF THE ESTATE OF DOROTHY L. 

THOMAS, DECEASED, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 299 WAL 2014 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the 

Order of the Superior Court filed April 9, 

2014 at No. 407 WDA 2013, reversing the 

Order of the Lawrence County Court of 

Common Pleas filed February 13, 2013 at 

No. 11091 of 2010, C.A. 

DISSENTING STATEMENT 

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE SAYLOR DECIDED: JANUARY 23, 2015 

 I respectfully dissent from the majority’s summary disposition of this case on the 

allocatur docket. The Court’s Internal Operating Procedures require that “[a] per curiam 

order granting allowance of appeal and reversing an order of the lower court must cite 

to controlling legal authority or provide a full explanation of the reasons for reversal.” 

Supreme Court IOP §6(B). The rule is plainly intended to provide litigants with a 

reasonably developed explanation as to why the Court is exercising its discretion to 

disturb the status quo attained in an as-of-right direct appeal. In this regard, the 

majority’s mere citation to a general legal principle, without any attempt to explain how 

that principle applies to the particular facts under review, is facially deficient. 
 Absent a citation to directly controlling authority involving an analogous 

paradigm, this Court should, at most, grant the request for allocatur and consider the 

merits upon full briefing by the parties. 

 Madame Justice Todd joins this dissenting statement.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS ADDED
BY


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Marco Community Bancorp,
Inc.  (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Richard
Storm, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of and for the period covered by the
Report.








Date:
            May 9, 2008
            
            By:
            /s/ Richard Storm,
  Jr.Richard
      Storm, Jr., Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE, ACCOUNTING AND

FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of New PacificVentures, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2005, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I Brent Petterson, Secretary/Treasurer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

   (1)  the Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

   (2)  the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/Brent PettersonBrent PettersonSecretary/TreasurerJune 13, 2005
### §8123. Procurement of prosthetic appliances

The Secretary may procure prosthetic appliances and necessary services required in the fitting, supplying, and training and use of prosthetic appliances by purchase, manufacture, contract, or in such other manner as the Secretary may determine to be proper, without regard to any other provision of law.

(Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1254, §5013; amended Pub. L. 94–581, title II, §210(e)(8), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2865; renumbered §5023, Pub. L. 96–22, title III, §301(b)(1), June 13, 1979, 93 Stat. 61; renumbered §8123, Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §402(b)(1), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 238; Pub. L. 102–83, §4(b)(1), (2)(E), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 404, 405.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–40 renumbered section 5023 of this title as this section.

Pub. L. 102–83 substituted "Secretary" for "Administrator" in two places.

1976—Pub. L. 94–581 substituted "the Administrator" for "he".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1976 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 94–581 effective Oct. 21, 1976, see section 211 of Pub. L. 94–581, set out as a note under section 111 of this title.
§ 310.5 Report of the Secretary on Federal recognition. If the Director's report recommends Federal recognition, the Secretary, within a reasonable time, shall submit a report to the President. ( a ) The Secretary's report shall include: ( 1 ) An evaluation of the purposes and reasons for the exposition; and
( 2 ) a determination as to whether guaranteed financial and other support has been secured by the exposition from affected State and local governments and from business and civic leaders of the region and others in amounts sufficient to assure the successful development and progress of the exposition.
( b ) Based on information from, and coordination with the Department of Commerce the Secretary of State shall also file a report with the President that the exposition qualifies for recognition by the BIE.
### §5319. Limitations on access to financial records

(a) The Secretary may make a request referred to in section 1113(p) of the Right to Financial Privacy Act of 1978 (12 U.S.C. 3413(p)) only if the Secretary determines that the requested information—

(1) is necessary in order for the Secretary to administer the provisions of law referred to in that section; and

(2) cannot be secured by a reasonable search of records and information of the Department.

(b) The Secretary shall include a certification of the determinations referred to in subsection (a) in each request presented to a financial institution.

(c) Information disclosed pursuant to a request referred to in subsection (a) may be used solely for the purpose of the administration of benefits programs under laws administered by the Secretary if, except for the exemption in subsection (a), the disclosure of that information would otherwise be prohibited by any provision of the Right to Financial Privacy Act of 1978.

(Added Pub. L. 102–568, title VI, §603(b)(1), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4342.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Right to Financial Privacy Act of 1978, referred to in subsec. (c), is title XI of Pub. L. 95–630, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3697, which is classified generally to chapter 35 (§3401 et seq.) of Title 12, Banks and Banking. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3401 of Title 12 and Tables.
BISNIS Trades & Tenders, February 22, 1999 - PART 2

----
Exhibit 32.2

             CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE, ACCOUNTING AND
             FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the Quarterly Report of New Pacific Ventures, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Gerry
Jardine, President of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.


/s/Gerry Jardine
------------------
Gerry Jardine
President/Director
September 18, 2003
ELLEN ELIZABETH 

STRICKLAND,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-5409

Opinion filed April 2, 2015.

Petition for Belated Appeal -- Original Jurisdiction.

Stacy A. Scott, Public Defender, and Phaladya Dean, Assistant Public Defender, 

Bronson, for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Samuel B. Steinberg, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner is granted a belated appeal of the October 15, 2014, judgment and 

sentence in Levy County Circuit Court case number 38-2014-CF-303A. Upon 

issuance of mandate in this cause, a copy of this opinion shall be provided to the clerk 
of the circuit court for treatment as the notice of appeal. Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(c)(6)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed counsel, the trial court shall 

appoint counsel to represent petitioner on appeal.

ROBERTS, CLARK, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.

2
Exhibit 10.48



 EXHIBIT 10.48 
  
 CRESTAR FINANCIAL CORPORATION 
 BOARD
OF DIRECTORS MEETING 
 September 26, 1997 
  

RESOLUTIONS AMENDING THE DIRECTORS’ EQUITY PROGRAM. 
  
 RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of Crestar Financial Corporation hereby amends Subsection 2(k) of the Directors’ Equity Program
to read as follows: 
  
 Director means a duly elected or appointed member of he Board who is not an employee of he Company or an affiliate or subsidiary of the Company, excluding any member of the Board who is required to transfer, assign
or pay his or her benefits under the Plan to a the member’s employer or firm. 
  
 FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of Crestar Financial Corporation hereby ratifies and affirms all awards that have been made
under the Directors’ Equity Program. 
  
 FINALLY RESOLVED, that the appropriate officers of the Corporation are hereby are hereby authorized and directed to take such actions and to execute such documents as they may deem necessary or appropriate to implement the foregoing
resolutions, all without the necessity of further action by this Board.
### §40707. Nonapplication of audit requirements

The audit requirements of section 10101 of this title do not apply to the corporation.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1337.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 40707 | (no source). | |

Section

The section is added to except the Corporation for the Promotion of Rifle Practice and Firearms Safety from the application of section 10101 of the revised title, restating 36:1101–1103, which imposes audit requirements on certain federally chartered corporations. The corporation is not included in the list of corporations set out in 36:1101 to which the audit requirements apply.
#### § 919.620 Do Federal agencies coordinate suspension and debarment actions?

Yes, when more than one Federal agency has an interest in a suspension or debarment, the agencies may consider designating one agency as the lead agency for making the decision. Agencies are encouraged to establish methods and procedures for coordinating their suspension and debarment actions.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00074

- CR

Phinny Paul Norton

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 43rd District Court

o f Parker County (CR13

- 0708 )

A ugust 20, 2015

Opinion by Justice Sudderth

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SE COND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

_______________ Justice Bonnie Sudderth
<PAGE>

                                                                   Page 10 of 25
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(b)


                        KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 1999-B
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE


Bank One, National Association              Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas
One Bank One Plaza, Suite 0126              fka, Bankers Trust Company
Chicago, IL 60670                           280 Park Avenue 9th Floor
Attn: Corporate Trust Administration        New York, NY 10017
Phone: (312) 407-0192                       Attn: Corporate Trust & Agency Group
Fax: (312) 407-1708                         Structured Finance
                                            Phone: (212) 454-4298
                                            Fax: (212) 454-2331

Key Bank USA, National Association
800 Superior Ave, 4th Floor
Cleveland, OH 44114
ATTN: Senior Vice President
Key Education Resources
Phone: (216) 828-9342
Fax: (216) 828-9417


Pursuant to Section 3.08 of the Subservicing Agreement between Key Bank USA,
National Association as Master Servicer and Pennsylvania Higher Education
Assistance Agency, as Subservicer, dated as of September 1, 1999 (the
"Agreement"), the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) a review of the
activities of PHEAA as Subservicer from January 1, 2002, through December 31,
2002, and of its performance under the Agreement has been made, and (ii) to the
best of the undersigned's knowledge, based on the review, PHEAA as Subservicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period.

The undersigned also hereby certifies that the Subservicer has disclosed to the
Master Servicer and to the Trust's certified public accountants all significant
deficiencies relating to the Subservicer's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards in accordance with a review conducted in compliance with the Uniform
Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar standard as set forth
in the Agreement.


                                                PENNSYLVANIA HIGHER EDUCATION
                                                ASSISTANCE AGENCY, Subservicer


Date: March 14, 2003                            By: /s/ RICHARD E. WILLEY
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Name: Richard E. Willey
                                                   Title: President and CEO
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-41583

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ISIDRO CRUZ-SANCHEZ, also known as Cindy, also known as Chimuelo,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:15-CR-1435-7

Before KING, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Isidro Cruz-Sanchez has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Cruz-Sanchez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and 

the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 24, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-41583 Document: 00514207161 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/24/2017
No. 16-41583

2

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-41583 Document: 00514207161 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/24/2017