alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §7699. Eligibility; agreement

(a) In General.—An individual is eligible to participate in the Program, as determined by the Readjustment Counseling Service of the Department, if the individual—

(1) is accepted for enrollment or enrolled (as described in section 7602 of this title) in a program of study at an accredited educational institution, school, or training program leading to a terminal degree in psychology, social work, marriage and family therapy, or mental health counseling that would meet the education requirements for appointment to a position under section 7402(b) of this title; and

(2) enters into an agreement with the Secretary under subsection (c).

(b) Priority.—In selecting individuals to participate in the Program, the Secretary shall give priority to the following individuals:

(1) An individual who agrees to be employed by a Vet Center located in a community that is—

(A) designated as a medically underserved population under section 330(b)(3) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254b(b)(3)); and

(B) in a State with a per capita population of veterans of more than five percent according to the National Center for Veterans Analysis and Statistics and the Bureau of the Census.

(2) An individual who is a veteran.

(c) Agreement.—An agreement between the Secretary and a participant in the Program shall (in addition to the requirements set forth in section 7604 of this title) include the following:

(1) An agreement by the Secretary to provide the participant with a scholarship under the Program for a specified number of school years during which the participant pursues a program of study described in subsection (a)(1) that meets the requirements set forth in section 7602(a) of this title.

(2) An agreement by the participant to serve as a full-time employee of the Department at a Vet Center for a six-year period following the completion by the participant of such program of study (in this subchapter referred to as the "period of obligated service").

(d) Vet Center Defined.—In this section, the term "Vet Center" has the meaning given that term in section 1712A(h) of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 116–171, title V, §502(a), Oct. 17, 2020, 134 Stat. 815.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Secretary of Veterans Affairs to begin awarding scholarships under this subchapter for programs of study beginning no later than one year after Oct. 17, 2020, see section 502(c) of Pub. L. 116–171, set out as a note under section 7698 of this title.
§ 837.504 Redetermined annuity. ( a ) *Title requirements.* ( 1 ) A reemployed annuitant is entitled, on separation, or conversion to intermittent service, to a redetermined annuity if— ( i ) The annuitant performed— ( A ) At least 5 years of actual, continuous, full-time service;
( B ) Actual, continuous part-time service equivalent to 5 years of actual full-time service, or;
( C ) A combination of part-time and full-time actual, continuous service that is equivalent to 5 years of actual full-time service.
( ii ) ( A ) The annuity was not terminated or suspended during reemployment; and
( B ) The pay during reemployment was subject to offset by the amount of annuity allocable to the period of reemployment; *or*
( C ) The reemployed annuitant separated from an interim appointment made under the provisions of § 772.102 of this chapter.
( iii ) Retirement deductions are withheld, or a deposit is paid, for the entire period of continuous reemployment service immediately preceding the most recent separation from reemployment service; and
( iv ) The reemployed annuitant elects the redetermined annuity in lieu of his or her prior annuity and the supplemental annuity that would be payable under § 837.503 of this subpart.
( 2 ) An employee whose annuity was terminated under the provisions of § 837.202(b)(1)(iii) of this part, and who has not elected FERS coverage, is entitled to a redetermined annuity on separation.
( b ) *Computation.* ( 1 ) A redetermined annuity is computed using all the reemployed annuitant's creditable service, under the provisions of law in effect governing the payment of CSRS and/or FERS annuities, as may be applicable, at the time of separation from reemployment service, or conversion to intermittent status.
( 2 ) The amount of the redetermined annuity of an individual whose previous annuity was terminated under the provisions of § 837.202(b)(1)(iii) of this part will at least equal the amount of the terminated annuity plus any increases under section 8340 of title 5, United States Code, occurring after the termination of the previous annuity and before the commencement of the redetermined annuity, adjusted by any annuity increase or reduction resulting from additional or different elections made by the reemployed annuitant.
( c ) *Commencing date.* The commencing date of the redetermined annuity is the same as the law and/or regulations would provide in the case of a retiring employee.
U.S. STATES EXPORTDATA AVAILABLE FROM BISNIS ONLINE

----
Exhibit 32.1








STELLAR RESOURCES LTD.


OFFICER’S CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Stellar Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2010as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ray Jefferd, President, and Chief Executive Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:




(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated  June 17, 2010






/s/ Ray Jefferd


Ray Jefferd


President and Chief Executive Officer
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T17:33:39-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Marianne Teitelbaum et al., Appellants, against Warden of the Women's House of Detention et al., Respondents.

Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.; Glennon and Callahan, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm.
#### § 9801.101 Purpose and scope.

This part contains the regulations of the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency (CIGIE) implementing the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a. This part sets forth the basic responsibilities of CIGIE with regard to CIGIE's compliance with the requirements of the Privacy Act and offers guidance to members of the public who wish to exercise any of the rights established by the Privacy Act with regard to records maintained by CIGIE. These regulations should be read in conjunction with the Privacy Act, which explains in more detail individuals' rights.
NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETINGS IN TEXAS AND MARYLAND 

ON PHYSICAL PROTECTION RULES FOR RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold two public meetings, in Austin, Texas, 

and Rockville, Md., to solicit public comment on draft guidance for implementing new security 

requirements for certain radioactive materials. 

 The first meeting will be held Sept. 1 at the Doubletree Hotel, 6505 Interstate Highway 

35 North, in Austin. The second meeting will be Sept. 20 at the NRC Auditorium, Two White 

Flint North, 11545 Rockville Pike, in Rockville. Both meetings will run from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. 

 Participants may join the Rockville meeting on Sept. 20 online at 

https://www1.gotomeeting.com/join/221305272 and by calling (888) 469-1280 (passcode 56389) 

for the audio. Participants wishing to participate virtually are urged to contact Amanda Noonan 

in advance at (301) 415-2551 or amanda.noonan@nrc.gov to ensure that sufficient phone lines 

are available. 

 The NRC published proposed regulations for the physical protection of Category 1 and 

Category 2 radiation sources in the Federal Register on June 15. These sources, as categorized 

by the International Atomic Energy Agency, are considered the most risk-significant from a 

safety and a security standpoint. The public comment period for the proposed rule ends Oct. 13. 

The agency published a notice of availability for the draft implementation guidance on 

July 14. The draft guidance is available through the NRC’s ADAMS online database at 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html by using accession number 

ML101470684, and can also be found at http://www.regulations.gov by searching on Docket ID: 

NRC-2010-0194. 

### 

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand. 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-149 August 26, 2010
NRC ASSIGNS NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR

TO VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Sarah Rich has been selected as the new Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission resident inspector at the Vermont Yankee nuclear power 

plant in Vernon, Vt. She joins NRC Senior Resident Inspector Dave 

Spindler at the site, operated by Entergy Nuclear. 

“Sarah Rich’s education, training and commitment to safety will 

help the NRC in its mission of protecting people and the environment by 

helping ensure that Vermont Yankee meets the high standards set by the 

agency,” NRC Region I Administrator Bill Dean said. 

Rich joined the NRC in August 2008 after earning a bachelor’s degree in nuclear science 

and engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. She graduated from the 

agency’s Nuclear Safety Professional Development Program, a two-year program that provides 

specialized training in nuclear safety and a broad perspective of NRC regulatory activities. She 

has also completed the NRC’s inspector qualification program. 

Each U.S. commercial nuclear plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They serve 

as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major work 

projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. 

The Vermont Yankee resident inspectors can be reached at 802-257-4319.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region I 

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. I-10-047

Contact: Diane Screnci (610) 337-5330

 Neil Sheehan (610) 337-5331

November 24, 2010

Email: OPA1.RESOURCE@nrc.gov
<PAGE> 1



                                                                   Exhibit 32.2

                      Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             As Adopted Pursuant To
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


      In connection with the Report of Allegheny Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Claudia
L. Acord, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

      No purchaser or seller of securities or any other person shall be entitled
to rely upon the foregoing certification for any purpose. The undersigned
expressly disclaim any obligation to update the foregoing certification except
as required by law.

                                          /s/ CLAUDIA L. ACORD
                                          --------------------------------
                                          Claudia L. Acord
                                          Chief Financial Officer

                                          May 6, 2004
EXHIBIT 32

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                    
|---------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual report of eRoomSystem Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), David A. Gestetner, Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Secretary (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|/s/ David A. Gestetner |  | President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and and Chairman of the Board  |  | March 29, 2004
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------
|David A. Gestetner     |  | (Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer) |  |
## Department of Environmental Conservation

DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY Director’s Office 410 Willoughby Avenue, Suite 303 PO Box 111800 Juneau, AK 99811

- 1800 Main: 907

- 465

- 5100 Toll free: 866

- 241

- 2805 fax: 907

- 465

- 5129 http://dec.alaska.gov/air/index.htm June 4, 2014

Donna Deneen U.S. EPA Region 10 Office of Air, Waste, and Toxics (AWT

- 107) 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle , WA 98101

Docket ID: EPA

- R10

- OAR

- 2011

- 0916

Dear Ms. Deneen:

Th e Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) has reviewed the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) proposed “Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Alaska”, published in the Federal Register on May 5, 2014 (79 Federal Register 25 533). ADEC appreciates EPA’s work on approving Alaska’s State Implementation Plan (SIP) submissions from 2008

– 2013 in this action. ADEC also appreciates the opportunity to comment on the proposed approval and provides the following comments. ADEC support s EPA’s proposed approval of revisions to Alaska’s SIP. ADEC does, however, have comments on some of the provisions EPA is proposing to disapprove. 18 AAC 50.345(l): EPA states that this section give s ADEC unbounded dis cretion to change source testing requ irements in Federally

- enforceable permits without changing the permit. ADEC staff assert that it is unreasonable to expect ADEC to do a permit revision and get EPA approval when ADEC can’t know a permittee will need an extension to source testing requireme nts (usually involved with the timing of them) until it happens. ADEC needs the flexibility provided by 18 AAC 50.345(l) to account for unique logistical situations such as when a permittee is unable to get a source test contractor on site by the permit deadline due to such issues as contractor shortages or
extreme

- weather

- related scheduling problems. When ADEC receives a request for an extension, staff grants extensions and requires that th e source test be conducted as expeditiously as possible. ADEC staff estimates we may receive only a dozen or so such requests annually. Therefore ADEC requests that EPA approve 18 AAC 50.345(l). 18 AAC 50.346(a): EPA asserts that this subsection only requi res corrective action after the permittee or ADEC determines a violation has occurred and therefore cannot be construed as monitoring to assure compliance. 18 AAC 50.346(a) deals with the adoption by reference and use of Standard Operating Permit Condition II

– Air Pollution Prohibited. ADEC believes that EPA may have incorrectly interpreted the conditions in Standard Operating Permit Condition II. Condition II.2.1 addresses situations in which emissions present a potential threat to human health and safety and require that such emissions be reported. Actual impacts are, therefore , monitored. A dditionally, Conditions II.2.1 and II.2.2 require reporting and investigation of emissions that are believed to have caused or are causing a violation of Condition II. 1 , and Condition II.2.4 requires permittees to keep records, all of which constitute 

### Clean Air
§ 919.715 What notice does the suspending official give me if I am suspended? After deciding to suspend you, the suspending official promptly sends you a Notice of Suspension advising you— ( a ) That you have been suspended;
( b ) That your suspension is based on— ( 1 ) An indictment;
( 2 ) A conviction;
( 3 ) Other adequate evidence that you have committed irregularities which seriously reflect on the propriety of further Federal Government dealings with you; or
( 4 ) Conduct of another person that has been imputed to you, or your affiliation with a suspended or debarred person;
( c ) Of any other irregularities in terms sufficient to put you on notice without disclosing the Federal Government's evidence;
( d ) Of the cause(s) upon which we relied under § 919.700 for imposing suspension;
( e ) That your suspension is for a temporary period pending the completion of an investigation or resulting legal or debarment proceedings;
( f ) Of the applicable provisions of this subpart, Subpart F of this part, and any other OPM procedures governing suspension decision making; and
( g ) Of the governmentwide effect of your suspension from procurement and nonprocurement programs and activities.
1

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS 

(Filed: March 17, 2017) 

No. 16-726V 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * 

EDITH BOGNAR, * UNPUBLISHED

*

Petitioner, * Decision on Joint Stipulation;

* Infection; Hives; Varicella 

v. * Vaccine. 

* 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * 

* 

Respondent. * 

* 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * 

Andrew Downing, Van Cott & Talamante, Phoenix, AZ, for petitioner. 

Gordon Shemin, US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. 

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1

Roth, Special Master: 

On June 21, 2016, Edith Bognar [“Ms. Bognar,” or “petitioner”] filed a petition for 

compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 Petition, ECF No. 1. 

Petitioner alleges that she developed a varicella infection and hives as a result of receiving a 

varicella vaccination on or 

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I 

intend to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance 

with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified 

as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), a party 

has 14 days to identify and move to delete medical or other information, that satisfies the criteria 

in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B). Further, consistent with the rule requirement, a motion for 

redaction must include a proposed redacted decision. If, upon review, I agree that the identified 

material fits within the requirements of that provision, I will delete such material from public 

access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. 

Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent 

subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).
2

about June 30, 2015. See Stipulation, filed March 17, 2017, ECF No. 23, at ¶¶ 1-4. Respondent 

denies that the varicella immunization caused petitioner’s injury. Stipulation at ¶ 6. 

Nevertheless, the parties have agreed to settle the case. On March 17, 2017, the parties 

filed a joint stipulation agreeing to settle this case and describing the settlement terms. 

Respondent agrees to issue the following payment: 

A lump sum of $75,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Edith 

Bognar. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be 

available under § 300aa-15(a). 

I adopt the parties’ stipulation attached hereto, and award compensation in the amount 

and on the terms set forth therein. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in 

accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

s/ Mindy Michaels Roth 

 Mindy Michaels Roth 

 Special Master 

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party filing a 

notice renouncing the right to seek review.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 17, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 67379]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25465]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster <greek-i>3627]


State of Florida; Amendment <greek-i>2

    In accordance with a notice received from the Department of 
Homeland Security--Federal Emergency Management Agency--effective 
November 3, 2004, the above numbered declaration is hereby amended to 
extend the deadline for filing applications for physical damages as a 
result of this disaster to December 31, 2004.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for economic injury is June 16, 2005.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: November 9, 2004.
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-25465 Filed 11-16-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P