alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC ANNOUNCES SELECTION OF NEW MEMBER OF THE 

ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON MEDICAL USES OF ISOTOPES 

 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission today announced the selection of 

Pat B. Zanzonico, Ph.D., as the nuclear medicine medical physicist 

representative on the Advisory Committee on the Medical Uses of Isotopes 

(ACMUI). The ACMUI was established in 1958 and advises the NRC on 

policy and technical issues related to the regulation of the medical use of 

radioactive material. 

 

 Zanzonico currently serves as a member and attending physicist at 

Gerstner Sloan-Kettering Graduate School at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering 

Cancer Center, where he also serves as co-head of the Center's nuclear 

medicine research and small-animal imaging laboratories while chairing its 

committee on radiation. 

 Previously in his career, he served as a research fellow, research associate and assistant 

member at the Center before joining the faculty of the department of radiology (nuclear medicine) of 

the New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center. 

 Currently, he serves on the special contributing faculty and on the radioactive drug research 

committees at both the Center and at the New York Presbyterian Hospital/Weill-Cornell Medical 

College. He is actively involved in biomedical research on radionuclide-based methods for detecting 

and localizing tumor hypoxia, immune effector-cell trafficking, patient-specific dosimetry for 

radionuclide therapies, and small-animal and molecular imaging. 

 

 Zanzonico is a member of the editorial board and past associate editor of the Journal of 

Nuclear Medicine, member of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement and of 

the medical internal radionuclide dosimetry committee, and an expert consultant to the International 

Atomic Energy Agency. In addition, he has authored more than 80 peer-reviewed publications and 

more than 65 invited presentations. 

 

 Zanzonico received his bachelor of science degree in physics from Cooper Union in New 

York City and his doctorate degree from the Cornell University Graduate School of Medical Sciences 

in New York. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. 

E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-030 February 17, 2010
#### § 265.15 Right-of-way in crosswalks.

No person shall fail or refuse to yield the right-of-way to a pedestrian or bicyclist crossing a street in a marked crosswalk.
EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Petaluma and Santa Rosa Railroad Company

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning the continued status of

Petaluma and Santa Rosa Railroad Company (PSRR), B.A. No. 2743, ds an employer under the

Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231 et seq.HRRA) and the Railroad Unemployment

Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. § 351 et seq.HRUIA).

In Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) Docket No. AB-15, decided May 3, 1984, PSRR 

filed an application for a certificate of public convenience and necessity permitting the

abandonment of its entire line of railroad. The 12.02 miles of rail line in Sonoma County,

California include: (1) the Santa Rosa branch between milepost 22.06 near Santa Rosa and

milepost 16.66 near Sebastopol; (2) the Old Forrestville branch between milepost 16.66 near 

Sebastopol and milepost 21.68 near Sagu; and (3) the West Petaluma branch between milepost 

0.354 near Petaluma and milepost 1.349 near West Petaluma. During the ICC’s investigation,

PSRR subsequently withdrew its application and notified the ICC that PSRR’s assets were going

to be sold to its corporate parent, Northwestern Pacific Railroad Company (NWP), B.A. No.

1711, a subsidiary of the Southern Pacific Transportation Company, B.A. No. 1713. NWP 

purchased 1.601 miles of PSRR’s rail line and the ICC authorized the abandonment of PSRR’s

remaining line of railroad.

Information regarding PSRR was provided by Mr. Daniel J. Leehane, Assistant Director of

Taxes-Audit of Southern Pacific Lines. According to Mr. Leehane, NWP purchased 1.601 miles

of PSRR’s track and approximately 5.356 acres of land. He also stated that on October 31,

1985, PSRR merged with NWP. He stated that Southern Pacific’s tax records indicate that

PSRR has not compensated employees since 1970. He stated that it appears that PSRR’s

operations were conducted by NWP after that date.

Section 202.11 (20 CFR § 202.11) of the Board’s regulations states:

The employer status of any company or person shall terminate whenever such 

company or person loses any of the characteristics essential to the existence of an 

employer status.

The evidence of record establishes that PSRR no longer possesses the characteristics of an

operating railroad company covered by the Acts; accordingly, under section 202.11 of the

Board’s regulations, PSRR is no longer a covered employer under the RRA and RUIA.

BCD 1996-78

BA# 2743
EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Petaluma and Santa Rosa Railroad Company

The Board finds that effective with the close of business October 31, 1985, the date the merger

acquisition was completed, Petaluma and Santa Rosa Railroad Company ceased being a covered 

employer under the RRA and the RUIA.

V. M. Speakman, Jr.

Jerome F. Kever
#### Gertrude Novick et al., Appellants, v. Levitt & Sons, Inc., Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Johnston, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ. [200 Misc. 694.]
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DE CEMBER 23, 2016

NO. 03
- 15
- 00505
- CV

David Rogers, Appellant

v. Gregorio “Greg” Casar, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 201ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, G OODWIN, AND FIELD AFFIRMED
-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the amended fina l judgment sign ed by the trial court on July 23, 2015, which incorporated the terms of its orders granting summary judgment and sanctions , and the order on request for amended and additional findings of fact and conclusions of law sig ned by the trial court on August 12, 2015

. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the
C ourt holds that there was no reversible error in the trial court’s amended final judgment or the order on request for amended and additional findings of fact and conclusions of law . Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s amended final judgment and the order on request for amended and additional findings of fact and conclusions of law

. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, bo th in this Court and in the court below.
BA # 5824
# L_2023164EN.01003001.xml

| 29.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 164/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 164/30

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 306/2022

of 9 December 2022

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2023/1248]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/825 of 17 March 2022 amending Annex II to Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2014 on the work programme for the systematic examination of all existing active substances contained in biocidal products referred to in Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/825 of 17 March 2022 amending Annex II to Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2014 on the work programme for the systematic examination of all existing active substances contained in biocidal products referred to in Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 12nza (Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2014) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘- | 32022 R 0825: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/825 of 17 March 2022 (OJ L 147, 30.5.2022, p. 3).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘-

32022 R 0825: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/825 of 17 March 2022 (OJ L 147, 30.5.2022, p. 3).’

Article 2

The text of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/825 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 10 December 2022, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 9 December 2022.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kristján Andri STEFÁNSSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 147, 30.5.2022, p. 3.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
B.C.D. 02-74

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad Company

Mount Hood Railway Company

Oregon Short Line Railroad Company

Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Company

Spokane International Railroad Company

Des Chutes Railroad Company

This is the decision ofthe Railroad Retirement Board regarding the continued 

status ofthe following railroads as employers under the Railroad Retirement and

Railroad Unemployment Insurance Acts: Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad

Company (B.A. No. 8040), Mount Hood Railway Company (B.A. No. 3628),

Oregon Short Line Railroad Company (B.A. No. 8041), Oregon-Washington 

Railroad & Navigation Company (B.A. No. 8038), Spokane International Railroad

Company (B.A. No. 1614), and Des Chutes Railroad Company1.

The above railroads were all merged into the Union Pacific Railroad Company at

the end of December 19872.

Accordingly, the Board holds that Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad Company, 

Mount Hood Railway Company, Oregon Short Line Railroad Company, OregonWashington Railroad & Navigation Company, Spokane International Railroad

Company, and Des Chutes Railroad Company ceased to be employers under the

Railroad Retirement and Railroad Unemployment Insurance Acts effective with 

the close of business on December 31, 1987.

V. M. Speakman, Jr.

No B.A. number was assigned to the De Chutes Railroad Company; however, it had been held to be a covered

employer under the Acts.

2 Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Company and Des Chutes Railroad Company were merged into the

Oregon Short Line Railroad Company before that company was merged into the Union Pacific.

BA# 8040
oe..___ 6H 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0553

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF:

MIKI ADAMS,

 Petitioner and Appellee,

 and

DIRK ADAMS,

 Respondent and Appellant.

ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly 

and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c), Nels Swandal was appointed as 

mediator on October 18, 2022. He has since declined the appointment due to a conflict of 

interest. Therefore, Mr. Swandal’s appointment is vacated. 

IT IS ORDERED THAT Christopher J. Gillette, whose name appears next on 

the list of attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Domestic Relations appeals 

which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the 

mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 

7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment.

A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to 

the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof.

DATED this October 19, 2022.

Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court

c: Dirk S. Adams, Jami L. Rebsom, Adrienne R. Ellington, William Nels Swandal, 

Christopher J. Gillette

10/19/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0553
# L_2022175EN.01001701.xml

| 30.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 175/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 175/17

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 8/2022

of 4 February 2022

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2022/1056]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/779 of 18 May 2016 laying down uniform rules as regards the procedures for determining whether a tobacco product has a characterising flavour (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/779 of 18 May 2016 laying down uniform rules as regards the procedures for determining whether a tobacco product has a characterising flavour (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 3g (Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/787) of Chapter XXV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘3h. | 32016 R 0779: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/779 of 18 May 2016 laying down uniform rules as regards the procedures for determining whether a tobacco product has a characterising flavor (OJ L 131, 20.5.2016, p. 48).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘3h.

32016 R 0779: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/779 of 18 May 2016 laying down uniform rules as regards the procedures for determining whether a tobacco product has a characterising flavor (OJ L 131, 20.5.2016, p. 48).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/779 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 5 February 2022, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*), or on the day of the entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 6/2022 of 4 February 2022 (2), whichever is the later.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 4 February 2022.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Nicolas VON LINGEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 131, 20.5.2016, p. 48.

1

(*)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*

(2)  See page 12 of this Official Journal.

2

---
Order filed December 8, 2016 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00687-CV

____________

LATASHA ROSE, Appellant

V.

HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellee

On Appeal from the 127th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2014-27763

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due November 28, 2016. No brief or motion for 

extension of time has been filed. 

Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or before January 9, 2017, 

the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM
Editorial Note on Subpart D of Part 9701
Editorial Note: At 73 FR 58435, Oct. 7, 2008, the application of subpart D to part 9701 was rescinded.

§ 9701.410 DHS responsibilities. In carrying out its performance management system(s), DHS must— ( a ) Transfer ratings between subordinate organizations and to other Federal departments or agencies;
( b ) Evaluate its performance management system(s) for effectiveness and compliance with this subpart, DHS implementing directives and policies, and the provisions of 5 U.S.C. chapter 23 that set forth the merit system principles and prohibited personnel practices;
( c ) Provide OPM with a copy of the implementing directives, policies, and procedures that implement this subpart; and
( d ) Comply with 29 CFR 1614.102(a)(5), which requires agencies to review, evaluate, and control managerial and supervisory performance to ensure enforcement of the policy of equal opportunity.
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 DEBBIE DENISE OHARA,

3 Plaintiff-Appellant,

4 vs. NO. A-1-CA-36370

5 ANGELA ANGEL,

6 Defendant-Appellee.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY

8 Denise Barela Shepherd, District Judge 

9 Debbie Denise Ohara

10 Albuquerque, NM 

11 Pro Se Appellant

12 Angela Angel

13 Albuquerque, NM 

14 Pro Se Appellee

15 MEMORANDUM OPINION

16 VANZI, Chief Judge.
2

1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has

3 been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

4 {2} AFFIRMED.

5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

6 __________________________________

7 LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge

8 WE CONCUR:

9 _________________________________

10 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

11 _________________________________

12 JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge
### §3201. Purpose

It is the purpose of this chapter (1) to provide educational assistance to those men and women who enter the Armed Forces after December 31, 1976, and before July 1, 1985, (2) to assist young men and women in obtaining an education they might not otherwise be able to afford, and (3) to promote and assist the all volunteer military program of the United States by attracting qualified men and women to serve in the Armed Forces.

(Added Pub. L. 94–502, title IV, §404, Oct. 15, 1976, 90 Stat. 2393, §1601; amended Pub. L. 99–576, title III, §309(a)(1), Oct. 28, 1986, 100 Stat. 3270; renumbered §3201, Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 406.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Prior section 3201 was renumbered section 5501 of this title.

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–83 renumbered section 1601 of this title as this section.

1986—Pub. L. 99–576 inserted "and before July 1, 1985,".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section 406 of title IV of Pub. L. 94–502 provided that: "The provisions of this title [enacting this chapter, amending sections 1652, 1661, and 1662 [now 3452, 3461, and 3462] of this title and section 725s of former Title 31, Money and Finance, and enacting provisions set out as a note under section 3221 of this title] shall become effective on January 1, 1977."

#### Short Title

For short titles of Pub. L. 94–502, and title IV of Pub. L. 94–502, which enacted this chapter, see Short Title of 1976 Amendments note set out under section 101 of this title.

#### Enrollment in Program Before April 1, 1987

Pub. L. 99–576, title III, §309(c), (d), Oct. 28, 1986, 100 Stat. 3270, provided that:

"(c) Exception.—Notwithstanding the amendments made by subsection (a) [amending this section and sections 1602 and 1621 [now 3202 and 3221] of this title], any individual on active duty in the Armed Forces who was eligible on June 30, 1985, to enroll in the program established by chapter 32 of title 38, United States Code, may enroll, before April 1, 1987, in such program.

"(d) Notice Requirement.—The Secretary of Defense, and the Secretary of Transportation with respect to the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Navy, shall carry out activities for the purpose of notifying, to the maximum extent feasible, individuals described in subsection (c) of the opportunity provided by such subsection."
### §1004. Computation of pay and allowances for month or part of month

A member of a uniformed service who is entitled to pay and allowances under this title for a continuous period of less than one month is entitled to his pay and allowances for each day of that period at the rate of 1/30 of the monthly amount of his pay and allowances. The thirty-first day of a calendar month may not be excluded from a computation under this section.

(Pub. L. 87–649, Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 490.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1004 | 37:310. | Oct. 12, 1949, ch. 681, §510, 63 Stat. 828. |
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determin ed that thi s opinio n should not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except und er the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE U NI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 31160 Su m m ar y Cal endar
CL AUDE PORT ER P l a i n ti ff-A p p ell a n t v. P A P AJ O H N ’ S P IZ Z A ; P . J . L O U IS IA N A , IN C
. D efen da n t s- A pp el l ees

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f ort he M i ddl e D i st r i c t of Loui si ana U SD C N o. 3: 09- C V 0341
B ef ore JO L L Y , W IE N E R , an d E L R O D , C i rcui t Ju dg es . P E R C U R I A M: * A FF I R M E D
. See R ul e 4 7. 6. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D April 27, 2010 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk Case: 09-31160 Document: 00511092603 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/27/2010