alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Illinois Smelting & Refining Company, Defendant in Error, v. Harold E. Horton and George H. Horton, trading as Chicago Aluminum Castings Company, Plaintiffs in Error.

Gen. No. 20,472.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Perry L. Persons, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the October term, 1915.

Reversed and judgment here.

Opinion filed January 17, 1916.

Statement of the Case.

Action by the Illinois Smelting & Refining Company, plaintiff, against Harold E. Horton and George H. Horton, trading as Chicago Aluminum Castings Company, defendants, for a balance claimed to be due for aluminum sold defendants. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants bring error.

Harvey Strickler, for plaintiffs in error.

Louis S. Gibson, for defendant in error.

Mr. Presiding Justice MoSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

*452Abstract of the Decision.

1: Accord and satisfaction, § *4*—what constitutes where claim, disputed.*Where there is a dispute as to the weight of metal sold and the parties agree that the seller shall weigh up the metal and that the purchaser shall make payment at once on the basis of the weight thus ascertained, and, after the metal is correctly weighed, a bill is presented in which a shortage of weight is deducted, and a.check given in payment therefor is accepted, there is an accord and satisfaction so as to preclude a recovery for an alleged balance.

2. Payment, § *29*—when evidence sufficient to establish payment of disputed claim.*In an action to recover an alleged balance for metal sold where it appeared that there was a dispute as to the weight, and there was undisputed evidence that the plaintiff carefully weighed and checked the metal, pursuant to an agreement of the parties, *held*that the evidence was sufficient to establish payment for all metal that had been delivered.
Exhibit
32.2


STELLAR
RESOURCES LTD.


OFFICER’S
CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTIONS 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Stellar Resources Ltd. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2009as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Lee Balak, Chief Executive
Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our
knowledge:





(1)        The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)        The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated  June
15, 2009





/s/
Lee
Balak


Lee
Balak


Chief
Executive Officer
#### Dorothy Feinberg, Respondent, v. Samoset Shellfish Company, Inc., Appellant.

Ro opinion. Present — Peck, R. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ [Order denied defendant’s motion to vacate judgment.]
II 

Calendar No. 341

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2396

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 9, 2003

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

OCTOBER 27, 2003

Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1210 Highland Avenue in Duarte, California, 

as the ‘‘Francisco A. Martinez Flores Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 1210 Highland Avenue in Duarte, California, 

6 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Francisco A. Mar7 tinez Flores Post Office’’. 
2

•HR 2396 RS 

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

5 to the ‘‘Francisco A. Martinez Flores Post Office’’. 

Calendar No. 341

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2396

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1210 Highland Avenue in 

Duarte, California, as the ‘‘Francisco A. Martinez Flores Post Office’’. 

OCTOBER 27, 2003

Reported without amendment
Ex-4.2



 






EXHIBIT 4.2

STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT WITH MR. STEPHEN T.D. DIXON



 






 




	 	 	 
	
	

	
    

    Notice of Grant of Stock Options

    and Option Agreement	 	
    ChromaVision Medical Systems, Inc.

    ID: 752649072

    33171 Paseo Cerveza

    San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
    
	

	
    Stephen T. D. Dixon

    30732 Hunt Club Drive

    San Juan Capistrano, CA USA 92675	 	
    Option Number: 00000737


Plan:                  STDD

    ID:
	






Effective 12/2/2002, you have been granted a(n)
Non-Qualified Stock Option to buy 300,000 shares of
ChromaVision Medical Systems, Inc. (the Company) stock at
$1.6400 per share.




The total option price of the shares granted is
$492,000.00.




Shares in each period will become fully vested on
the date shown.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Shares		Vest Type		Full Vest		Expiration
	
		
		
		

	 	75,000	 	 	
    On Vest Date
    	 	 	12/2/2003	 	 	 	12/2/2012	 
	 	225,000	 	 	
    Monthly
    	 	 	12/2/2006	 	 	 	12/2/2012	 















	 	 	 
	
    
    /s/ Michael G. Schneider
    

    	 	
    12/02/03
    
	
	 	

	
    
    ChromaVision Medical Systems, Inc.
    

    	 	
    Date
    
	 
	
    
    /s/ Stephen T. D. Dixon
    

    	 	
    12/2/03
    
	
	 	

	
    
    Stephen T. D. Dixon
    

    	 	
    Date
# L_2018215EN.01004201.xml

| 23.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 215/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 215/42

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 245/2016

of 2 December 2016

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2018/1181]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/472 of 31 March 2016 amending Regulation (EU) No 72/2010 as regards the definition of the term ‘Commission inspector’ (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/472 of 31 March 2016 amending Regulation (EU) No 72/2010 as regards the definition of the term ‘Commission inspector’ (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Point 66hc (Commission Regulation (EU) No 72/2010) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement shall be amended as follows:

| (1) | the following is added:

  ‘, as amended by:






  — | 32016 R 0472: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/472 of 31 March 2016 (OJ L 85, 1.4.2016, p. 28.)’; |
| --- | --- | --- |

(1)

the following is added:

‘, as amended by:

—

32016 R 0472: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/472 of 31 March 2016 (OJ L 85, 1.4.2016, p. 28.)’;

| (2) | the text of adaptation (b) is replaced by the following:

  ‘The following shall be added to Article 6(2):
  In its inspections the EFTA Surveillance Authority may call upon national auditors listed by EU Member States as well as inspectors employed by the Commission.’ |
| --- | --- |

(2)

the text of adaptation (b) is replaced by the following:

‘The following shall be added to Article 6(2):

In its inspections the EFTA Surveillance Authority may call upon national auditors listed by EU Member States as well as inspectors employed by the Commission.’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/472 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 3 December 2016, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 2 December 2016.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Bergdís ELLERTSDÓTTIR

---

(1)  
  OJ L 85, 1.4.2016, p. 28.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
§ 30.26 Reporting of vessels, aircraft, cargo vans, and other carriers and containers. ( a ) Export information shall be filed in the AES for all vessels, locomotives, aircraft, rail cars, trucks, other vehicles, trailers, pallets, cargo vans, lift vans, or similar shipping containers when these items are moving as goods pursuant to sale or other transfer from ownership in the United States to ownership abroad. If the vessel, car, aircraft, locomotive, rail car, vehicle, or shipping container is outside Customs territory of the United States at the time of sale or transfer to foreign ownership, EEI shall be reported identifying the last port of clearance or departure from the United States prior to sale or transfer. The date of export shall be the date of sale.
( b ) The country of destination to be shown in the EEI for vessels sold foreign is the country of new ownership. The country for which the vessel clears, or the country of registry of the vessel, should not be reported as the country of destination in the EEI unless such country is the country of new ownership.
[78 FR 16379, Mar. 14, 2013]
May 19, 2015

Richard A. Dohack

11790 Lakeshire Cir Fort Myers, FL 33913

Dear Mr. Richard A. Dohack:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your March 26th, 2015 exemption request on behalf into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-769), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
#### Portage Rubber Company, Defendant in Error, v. Fruin Drop Forge Company, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 18,722.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John D. Tubnkaugh, Judge, presiding.

Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1912.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed April 1, 1914.

Statement of the Case.

Action by Portage Rubber Company against Fruin Drop Forge Company to recover the price of 3,792 hoof pads manufactured for the defendant by the plaintiff. The case was tried without a jury and judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff for $388.05 and costs. To reverse the judgment, defendant brings error.

Plaintiff in error asks a reversal of the judgment upon three grounds: (1) That there was no contract *12between the parties for the manufacture of the goods;

(2) that there was no delivery of the goods sued for;

(3) that there was no agreement as to the price of the goods, and no proof in the record as to their value.

Harris F. Williams, for plaintiff in error.

Harper E. Osborn, for defendant in error.

Abstract of the Decision.

1. Contracts, § *44*
      ***
      *—what constitutes unconditional acceptance of offer.*When an offer is accepted as made, the acceptance is not conditional and does not vary from the offer because followed by inquiries whether the offerer will change his terms, or as to future acts, or because accompanied with expressions of hope or suggestions or requests, etc.

2. Sales, § *56*
      ***
      *—when answer to tetter constitutes unconditional acceptance of offer.*Where a company wrote another company ordering a certain number of hoof pads to be shipped on or after a certain date and stated in the letter, “If you will you may keep in stock over and above each order sent about 2,000 pieces each of” certain sizes, and the latter company in answer wrote a letter acknowledging the order and stating, “we also note that you would like for us to keep in stock * * * about 2,000 pieces each of above sizes. We will be glad to do this, but we would like for you to send us your regular order for same and mark the order ‘to be shipped when instructed to do so.’ You do not say how you want the fabric * * * but we are proceeding with the order taking it for granted that you want two plies of Duck clear across the heel,” *held*that the answer constituted an unconditional acceptance of the request to keep in stock 2,000 pieces each of the sizes requested.

3. Sai.es, § *329*
      ***
      *—sufficiency of the evidence.*In an action for the price of hoof pads manufactured by the plaintiff for the defendant, evidence *held*sufficient to show a contract between the parties, that a contract price was agreed upon, that the goods were held by the plaintiff as the property of defendant and that plaintiff was entitled to recover the price.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice Duncan

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony Ambrosia, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ.
Russia Ends  3 % Import Duty

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

# AGENCY:

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

# ACTION:

Notice of Designated Reserve Ratio for 2019.

                    Pursuant to the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation designates that the Designated Reserve Ratio (DRR) for the Deposit Insurance Fund shall remain at 2 percent for 2019.[1]                                          The Board is publishing this notice as required by section 7(b)(3)(A)(i) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(b)(3)(A)(i)).                

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ashley Mihalik, Chief, Banking and Regulatory Policy Section, Division of Insurance and Research, (202) 898-3793,                         *amihalik@fdic.gov;*                         Robert Grohal, Chief, Fund Analysis and Pricing Section, Division of Insurance and Research, (202) 898-6939,                         *rgrohal@fdic.gov;*                         or Nefretete Smith, Counsel, Legal Division, (202) 898-6851,                         *nefsmith@fdic.gov.*

Dated at Washington, DC, on December 18, 2018.

By order of the Board of Directors.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Valerie Best,

Assistant Executive Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             Section 327.4(g) of the FDIC's regulations sets forth the DRR. There is no need to amend this provision because the DRR for 2019 is the same as the current DRR.                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2019-00427 Filed 1-30-19; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
### §30702. Purpose

The purpose of the corporation is to foster the development of fundamental education through programs and projects such as—

(1) giving citizens (children, youth, and adults) an opportunity to acquire the understandings and skills necessary to relate the resources of the community to the needs and interests of the community;

(2) demonstrating programs of fundamental education and measuring results; and

(3) training men and women as leaders in fundamental education by providing internships and other experiences.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1322.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 30702 | 36:503. | July 19, 1954, ch. 536, §3, 68 Stat. 490. |

Section

Before clause (1), the word "objects" is omitted as unnecessary.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Penge Corp (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, KC
Holmes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                     /s/ KC Holmes
--------------------------------------------------------
          KC Holmes, Chief Financial Officer
                   May 15, 2007
#### Sidney Landau Diamond Cutting Corporation, Appellant, v. Nathan Weingarten, Respondent.

Determination unanimously affirmed, with costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Present- — Cohn, J. ¡P., Callahan, Breitel, Bastow and Botein, JJ.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T17:31:27-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
Post Final Decision Material

Not Included

in the Administrative Record
#### § 711.7 Where to submit declarations, reports and advance notifications.

Declarations, reports and advance notifications required by the CWCR must be sent either by fax to (202) 482-1731 or by mail or courier delivery to the following address: Treaty Compliance Division, Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 4515, 14th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, Telephone: (202) 482-1001. Specific types of declarations and reports and due dates are outlined in supplement no. 2 to parts 712 through 715 of the CWCR.

[73 FR 78182, Dec. 22, 2008]
§ 290.2 Definitions. ( a ) The phrase *advanced manufacturing technology* refers to new technologies which have recently been developed, or are currently under development, for use in product or part design, fabrication, assembly, quality control, or improving production efficiency.
( b ) The term *Center* or *Regional Center* means a NIST-established Regional Center for the Transfer of Manufacturing Technology described under these procedures.
( c ) The term *operating award* means a cooperative agreement which provides funding and technical assistance to a Center for purposes set forth in § 290.3 of these procedures.
( d ) The term *Director* means the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
( e ) The term *NIST* means the National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce.
( f ) The term *Program* or *Centers Program* means the NIST program for establishment of, support for, and cooperative interaction with Regional Centers for the Transfer of Manufacturing Technology.
( g ) The term *qualified proposal* means a proposal submitted by a nonprofit organization which meets the basic requirements set forth in § 290.5 of these procedures.
( h ) The term *Secretary* means the Secretary of Commerce.
( i ) The term *target firm* means those firms best able to absorb advanced manufacturing technologies and techniques, especially those developed at NIST, and which are already well prepared in an operational, management and financial sensse to improve the levels of technology they employ.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                       PERFORMANCE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC

                CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                           PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Performance Capital
Management, LLC (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), David J. Caldwell, as Chief Operations Officer of the Company,
and Edward M. Rucker, as Accounting Manager of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



  /s/ David J. Caldwell
-------------------------------
David J. Caldwell
Chief Operations Officer
November 12, 2003



  /s/ Edward M. Rucker
-------------------------------
Edward M. Rucker
Accounting Manager
November 12, 2003



The material contained in this exhibit is not deemed "filed" with the Commission
and  is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under
the  Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any
general  incorporation  language  contained in such filing, except to the extent
that  the  Company  specifically  incorporates  it  by  reference.


<PAGE>