alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2512 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2512

 To establish a realistic, threat-based allocation of grant funds for 
                           first responders.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 18, 2003

 Mr. Sweeney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To establish a realistic, threat-based allocation of grant funds for 
                           first responders.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``First Responders Funding Reform Act 
of 2003''.

SEC. 2. ALLOCATION OF GRANT FUNDS.

    Section 1014 of the USA PATRIOT Act (42 U.S.C. 3714) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (c)(3), by striking ``0.75 percent'' and 
        inserting ``0.5 percent'';
            (2) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d); and
            (3) by adding after subsection (b) the following new 
        subsection:
    ``(c) Basis for Grant Awards.--(1) Grants under this section shall 
be awarded based on a quantitative assessment of risk for three 
categories: threat, vulnerability, and consequences.
    ``(2) Not later than March 1 of each year, the Office shall submit 
to Congress the quantitative assessment required by paragraph (1).''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 28.410 Enforcement.

The head of each agency shall take such actions as are necessary to ensure that the provisions herein are vigorously implemented and enforced in that agency.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, Mark
Gatto, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President of ICON Capital Corp., the
Manager of the Registrant, in connection with the Quarterly Report of ICON
Income Fund Ten, LLC (the “LLC”) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”) certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the LLC.











Date: November
13, 2008





/s/Mark Gatto___


Mark
Gatto


Co-Chief
Executive Officer and Co-President


ICON
Capital Corp.


Manager
of ICON Income Fund Ten,
LLC
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 243 (Wednesday, December 19, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 65164]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27486]



[[Page 65164]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9988-19-Region 6]


Underground Injection Control Program; Hazardous Waste Injection 
Restrictions; Petition for Exemption Reissuance--Class I Hazardous 
Waste Injection; Veolia ES Technical Solutions, LLC (Veolia) Port 
Arthur Facility

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of a final decision on a UIC no migration petition 
reissuance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a reissuance of an exemption to 
the Land Disposal Restrictions, under the 1984 Hazardous and Solid 
Waste Amendments to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, has 
been granted to Veolia for a Class I hazardous waste injection well 
located at their Port Arthur, Texas facility. The company has 
adequately demonstrated to the satisfaction of the EPA by the petition 
reissuance application and supporting documentation that, to a 
reasonable degree of certainty, there will be no migration of hazardous 
constituents from the injection zone for as long as the waste remains 
hazardous. This final decision allows the underground injection by 
Veolia of the specific restricted hazardous wastes identified in this 
exemption reissuance request, into Class I hazardous waste injection 
well WDW-160 until December 31, 2041, unless the EPA moves to terminate 
this exemption. Additional conditions included in this final decision 
may be reviewed by contacting the EPA Region 6 Ground Water/UIC 
Section. A public notice was issued September 11, 2018, and the public 
comment period closed on October 29, 2018, and no comments were 
received. This decision constitutes final Agency action and there is no 
Administrative appeal.

DATES: This action is effective as of November 19, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the petition reissuance and all pertinent 
information relating thereto are on file at the following location:

Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, Water Division, Safe 
Drinking Water Branch (6WQ-S), 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-
2733.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Philip Dellinger, Chief Ground Water/
UIC Section, EPA--Region 6, telephone (214) 665-8324.

    Dated: November 19, 2018.
Charles W. Maguire,
Director, Water Division.
[FR Doc. 2018-27486 Filed 12-18-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
NRC ANNOUNCES AVAILABILITY OF LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION 

FOR COLUMBIA GENERATING STATION NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 

 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission announced today that an application for a 20-year 

renewal of the operating license for the Columbia Generating Station is available for public 

review. 

 The Columbia Generating Station is a boiling-water nuclear reactor, located 12 miles 

northwest of Richland, Wash. The current operating license expires on Dec. 20, 2023. 

 The licensee, Energy Northwest, submitted the renewal application by letter dated on 

Jan. 19. It is available on the NRC Web site at this address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications.html. 

 The NRC staff is currently conducting an initial review of the application to determine 

whether it contains enough information for the required formal review. If the application has 

sufficient information, the NRC will formally “docket,” or file, the application and will announce 

an opportunity to request a public hearing. 

 For further information, contact project managers Evelyn Gettys and Daniel Doyle in the 

Division of License Renewal, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission, Mail Stop O11-F1, Washington, D.C. 20555; telephone (301) 415-4029 and 

(301) 415-3788 or email Evelyn.Gettys@nrc.gov or Daniel.Doyle@nrc.gov. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-025 February 3, 2010
462 P.2d 137

#### The CITY OF TRUTH OR CONSEQUENCES, a Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank PIETRUSZKA and Mrs. Frank (Audre) Pietruszka, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 8824.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Dec. 8, 1969.

*4Frederick A. Smith, Truth or Consequences, for plaintiff-appellant.

Garnett R. Burks, Jr., Las Cruces, for defendants-appellees.

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

Appellant instituted this action to condemn two lots, the property of appellees of the alleged value of $720.00 for the purpose of a public housing project. Appellees answered claiming the value of the lots to be $3,500.00. The issue of damages was tried to the court and, at appellant’s request, the court viewed the premises before making its decision. The court found that the lots had a market value of $1,632.00 at the time of the taking. Judgment was entered accordingly, and the appellant appeals.

The appellant offered evidence that the market value of the lots was $720.00 and contends here that there is no evidence in the record that would support a finding by the trial court of a greater market value. We are unable to agree with the appellant. There is evidence of a substantial nature that some six years previously appellees had paid $1,200.00 for the lots in question and such evidence affords ample basis for an award of $1,200.00. Southern Electric Generating Co. v. Leibacher, 269 Ala. 9, 110 So.2d 308. See 5 Nichols on Eminent Domain, § 21.2 and 1 Orgel on Valuation under Eminent Domain, § 136. State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. Chavez, 80 N.M. 394, 456 P.2d 868.

The appellant insists that since appellees purchased a total of eight lots in a single transaction, including the lots in question, the purchase price rule does not apply. The trouble with appellant’s position is that the proof is to the contrary. Appellee, Frank Pietruszka, testified that he traded a jeep worth $2,500.00 for the remaining six lots; that the lots were not contiguous and that he made a separate deal for the lots in question, paying therefor $1,200.00.

But we find no support for an award above $1,200.00. No proof whatever was offered as to any value of the lots above that amount. While a view of the premises by the trier of the facts may be deemed independent evidence, Board of Com’rs of Dona Ana County v. Gardner, 57 N.M. 478, 260 P.2d 682, information obtained from such view cannot serve as the sole basis of an award. Compare American Telephone & Tel. Co. of Wyo. v. Walker, 77 N.M. 755, 427 P.2d 267; Board of County Com’rs of Dona Ana County v. Little, 74 N.M. 605, 396 P.2d 591.

We conclude that the trial court erred in the application of the measure of damages by $432.00. Appellees may within fifteen days file a remittitur with the clerk of the district court in the amount of $432.00 from the $1,632.00 judgment in their favor, and the judgment will be affirmed for $1,200.00, each party to bear his own costs; otherwise, the judgment will be reversed and remanded for a new trial on the issue of damages.

It is so ordered.

MOISE, C. J., and WATSON, J., concur.
#### Murphy Chemical Corporation, Appellant, v. Daniel M. McKetrick, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present— Péck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ. [185 Misc. 868.]
-80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

06/27

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 27 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I,
Michael A. Reisner, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President of ICON Capital
Corp., the Manager of the Registrant, in connection with the Quarterly Report of
ICON Income Fund Ten, LLC (the “LLC”) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the LLC.











Date: May
15, 2009





/s/Michael A.
Reisner___


Michael
A. Reisner


Co-Chief
Executive Officer and Co-President


ICON
Capital Corp.


Manager
of ICON Income Fund Ten,
LLC
MONTHLY PAYMENT DATE STATEMENT DISTRIBUTED TO HOLDERS


 Exhibit 10.1 
  

					
	 JPMorgan Chase Bank – Structured Finance Services
	  	 	  	 
	 4 New York Plaza, 6th Floor
	  	 	  	Distribution Date: 2/25/04
	 New York, NY 10004-2477
	  	 	  	 
	 Officer:        Taoheed A. Agbabiaka
	  	ph: 212-623-4481	  	 
	 	  	fax: 212-623-5858	  	 

  
 GreenPoint Mortgage
Securities LLC 
  
 GreenPoint Home Equity Loan Trust 2004-1

  
 Home Equity Loan Asset-Backed Notes 
 Series 2004-1 
  

																	
	 Distribution In Dollars


	 Class

	 	 Original
 Face
 Value

	 	 Beginning
 Principal
 Balance

	 	Principal

	 	Interest

	 	Total

	 	Realized
Loses

	  	Deferred
Interest

	 	 Ending
 Principal
 Balance


	 A1
	 	202,045,000.00	 	202,045,000.00	 	6,140,934.39	 	201,539.89	 	6,342,474.28	 	0.00	  	0.00	 	195,904,065.61
	 	 	
	 	
	 	
	 	
	 	
	 	
	  	
	 	

	 TOTALS
	 	202,045,000.00	 	202,045,000.00	 	6,140,934.39	 	201,539.89	 	6,342,474.28	 	0.00	  	0.00	 	195,904,065.61
	 	 	
	 	
	 	
	 	
	 	
	 	
	  	
	 	


  

													
	 Factor Information Per $1000 Of Original Face


	 Class

	  	Cusip

	  	Beginning
Principal

	  	Principal

	  	Interest

	  	Total

	  	Ending
Principal


	 A1
	  	395385AQ0	  	1,000.00000000	  	30.39389438	  	0.99750001	  	31.39139439	  	969.60610562
	 	  	 	  	
	  	
	  	
	  	
	  	

	 TOTALS
	  	 	  	1,000.00000000	  	30.39389438	  	0.99750001	  	31.39139439	  	969.60610562
	 	  	 	  	
	  	
	  	
	  	
	  	


  

									
	 Pass-Through Rates

	 
	 Class

	  	Previous

	  	Current

	 	 	Next

	 
	 A1
	  	 	  	1.330000	%	 	1.330000	%
	 TOTALS
### SUBCHAPTER V—SPECIAL ASSISTANCE FOR THE EDUCATIONALLY DISADVANTAGED
#### Ernesto Bitolio v. Bradley Contracting Company.

Motion denied, with ten dollai-s costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTHONY PIERCE GRIGSBY, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

HECTOR DANIEL LUDI, Medical Doctor, 

Attending Staff Physician, individual and 

official capacity; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-56355 

D.C. No. 5:14-cv-02316-JAK-JC 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

John A. Kronstadt, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 26, 2017**

Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Anthony Pierce Grigsby appeals pro se from the 

district court’s judgment dismissing for failure to prosecute his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 

action alleging deliberate indifference to a serious medical need. We have 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

OCT 4 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-56355 

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. 

Omstead v. Dell, Inc., 594 F.3d 1081, 1084 (9th Cir. 2010). We vacate and 

remand.

Although the district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing 

Grigsby’s action for failure to prosecute, see id., Grigsby attached to his notice of 

appeal prison mail logs and a declaration indicating that Grigsby never received 

the district court’s February 19, 2015 or March 20, 2015 orders. Because the 

district court did not have the benefit of these documents, we vacate the judgment 

of dismissal and remand so the district court can permit Grigsby to file a response 

to the order to show cause.

VACATED and REMANDED.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Page 17 of 17

                                  EXHIBIT 99(g)

Key Bank USA, National Association          Bankers Trust Company
127 Public Square                            as Indenture Trustee
Cleveland, Ohio  44114-1306                 4 Albany Street, 7th Floor
                                            New York, New York  10015

Bank One, National Association
  as Eligible Lender Trustee
One First National Plaza Suite 0126
Chicago, Illinois  60670

                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT
                      FOR KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 1999-A

We have examined management's assertion, included in its representation letter
dated March 19, 2001 that Key Bank USA, National Association (KBUSA), a wholly
owned subsidiary of KeyCorp, complied with sections 4.04, 4.08(a), 4.08(b),
4.08(c), 5.05, 5.06, 5.07 and 5.08 of the KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 1999-A Sale
and Servicing Agreement and sections 1.(a)(xx), 1.(b)(iii), 2 and 3 of the
KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 1999-A Administration Agreement (collectively, the
"Agreements") as of December 31, 2000 and for the period from January 1, 2000
through December 31, 2000. As discussed in the representation letter, management
is responsible for KBUSA's compliance with those requirements. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about KBUSA's
compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about KBUSA's compliance with
those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances, except that in accordance with Section 5.05 of
the Sale and Servicing Agreement, our examination assumed the accuracy of
reports prepared by KBUSA's student loan processor. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does
not provide a legal determination on KBUSA's compliance with the aforementioned
requirements.

In our opinion, assuming the accuracy of reports prepared by KBUSA's student
loan processor, management's assertion that KBUSA was in compliance with the
sections in the Agreements referred to above, as of December 31, 2000 and for
the period from January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2000, is fairly stated, in
all material respects.

This report is intended solely for your information and is not to be referred to
or distributed for any purpose to anyone who is not authorized to receive such
information as specified in the Agreements or in the exhibits attached thereto.

                                                   /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Cleveland
March 19, 2001
LETTER FROM JAN KALICKI

----
1 The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-1988

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Mario Flamenco, * Western District of Arkansas. * Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED] *

___________ Submitted: January 27, 2004 Filed: February 5, 2004

___________ Before MELLOY, HANSEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. A jury found Mario Flamenco guilty of one count of conspiring to distribute methamphetamine and one count of aiding and abetting the possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(viii), and 846, and 18 U.S.C. § 2. The district court 1 sentenced him to concurrent prison terms of 121 months followed by concurrent supervised release terms of 3 and 4 years. On appeal, counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a-2- brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), raising as issues whether the district court erred in sentencing Flamenco when it denied a downward departure and refused to find him eligible for a drug-treatment program, and erred at trial when it made adverse evidentiary rulings and refused to give certain jury instructions. The district court stated that it would not exercise its discretion to grant a downward departure based on Flamenco's deportable-alien status; that decision is unreviewable, see United States v. Lim , 235 F.3d 382, 385 (8th Cir. 2000). A careful review of the trial transcript shows that the district court's conclusion that Flamenco's offense was a serious drug trafficking offense precluding a departure for aberrant behavior under U.S.S.G. § 5K2.20 is correct. Flamenco cannot meet the requirement of U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2(a)(5). We conclude the district court did not err in leaving the drug-treatment determination to the Bureau of Prisons, see 18 U.S.C. § 3621(b); did not abuse its discretion in any of its evidentiary rulings, see United States v. Claxton , 276 F.3d 420, 422 (8th Cir. 2002) (standard of review); and did not err in denying Flamenco’s requests for jury instructions, see United States v. Lalley , 257 F.3d 751, 755 (8th Cir. 2001) (instructions as a whole must fairly and adequately submit issues to jury; court will reverse only if error affected defendant’s substantial rights). Following our independent review, seePenson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________
§ 295.25 Special rule for the valuation of transfers between separately-owned joint venture members. ( a ) *Applicability.* This section applies to transfers of goods, including computer software, and services provided by the transferor related to the maintenance of those goods, when those goods or services are transferred from one joint venture member to other separately-owned joint venture members.
( b ) *Rule.* The greater amount of the actual cost of the transferred goods and services as determined in accordance with applicable Federal cost principles, or 75 percent of the best customer price of the transferred goods and services, shall be deemed to be allowable costs; provided, however, that in no event shall the aggregate of these allowable costs exceed 30 percent of the non-Federal share of the total cost of the joint research and development program.
( c ) *Definition.* The term “best customer price” shall mean the GSA schedule price, or if such price is unavailable, the lowest price at which a sale was made during the last twelve months prior to the transfer of the particular good or service.
[62 FR 64687, Dec. 9, 1997]
### §125. Library memberships

Amounts appropriated may be used, when authorized by the Administrator of General Services, for payment in advance for library memberships in societies whose publications are available to members only, or to members at a lower price than that charged to the general public.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1071.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 125 | 40:475(a). | June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title VI, §603(a), formerly §503(a), 63 Stat. 403; renumbered [§] 603(a), Sept. 5, 1950, ch. 849, §6(a), (b), 64 Stat. 583; Sept. 5, 1950, ch. 849, §7(g), 64 Stat. 590. |

Section

The words "such sums as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this Act" are omitted as unnecessary.
Board Coverage Decision

2010-42.15

Minneapolis Northfield & Southern Railway

Company

Employer Coverage Terminated*

No Decision Published

BA # 1620