alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2015-0266 Directorate Identifier: 2015-NE-03-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Borescope 

inspection 4.0 $ 340.00 $0 $ 340.00 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 0

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): N/A
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
No. IV-11-032

Contact: Victor Dricks (817) 860-8128

 Lara Uselding (817) 276-6519

 

 July 11, 2011 

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

NRC PROPOSES $8,500 FINE FOR LUZENAC AMERICA, INC.

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has proposed an $8,500 fine against Luzenac 

America, Inc., of Three Forks, Mont., for inadvertently transferring a gauge containing 

radioactive material to a recycling center that was not authorized to receive it.

The company has an NRC license authorizing it to use gauges containing radioactive 

material in mining operations.

Employees of a recycling center in Bozeman, Mont. notified the NRC after discovering 

the gauge in their scrap yard last December, and secured the device. No members of the public 

received radiation doses in excess of NRC limits.

“Nevertheless, the NRC considers loss of control of licensed radioactive material a 

significant regulatory and security concern because of the potential for unauthorized possession, 

use, or exposure to unnecessary radiation to members of the public.” NRC Region IV 

Administrator Elmo E. Collins told the company in a letter announcing the proposed fine. 

The company took prompt and comprehensive corrective actions to address the cause of 

the violation following its investigation. This included purchase of hand-held scanners for 

sampling scrap metal for radioactive materials prior to recycling and special training for 

employees.

The company has 30 days to pay the proposed fine or challenge it.

The NRC’s letter, its enclosures and the licensee’s response will be made available to the 

public through the agency’s electronic reading room at http://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/adams/html. Help in finding these documents is available from the NRC Public Document 

Room at1-800-397-4209.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125

Telephone: (817) 860-8128

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov
# L_2022298EN.01003901.xml

| 17.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 298/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 298/39

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 201/2019

of 10 July 2019

amending Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement, on cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms [2022/2223]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Articles 86 and 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | It is appropriate to continue the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the EEA Agreement in Union actions funded from the general budget of the Union regarding the preparatory action on Defence research. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

It is appropriate to continue the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the EEA Agreement in Union actions funded from the general budget of the Union regarding the preparatory action on Defence research.

| (2) | Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for that extended cooperation to take place from 1 January 2019, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for that extended cooperation to take place from 1 January 2019,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In paragraph 13(a) of Article 1 of Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement, the words “and 2018” are replaced by the words “, 2018 and 2019”.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following the last notification under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement (*).

It shall apply from 1 January 2019.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 10 July 2019.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gunnar PÁLSSON

---

(*)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*

---
#### § 325.15 Relinquishing a certificate.

A certificate holder may relinquish a certificate at any time through written notice to the Secretary. The certificate will cease to be effective on the day the Secretary receives the notice.
Exhibit
32








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








Pursuant to Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as President and Chief
Executive Officer and Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, respectively,
of Nortek, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify that to their
knowledge:





1.
            the Company’s
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal year quarter March 29, 2008
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            the
      information contained in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
      the fiscal quarter ended March 29, 2008 fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.














/s/Richard L.
Bready


Name:  Richard
L. Bready


Title:    
President and Chief Executive Officer











/s/Almon C.
Hall


Name:Almon C. Hall


Title:VicePresident and ChiefFinancialOfficer
BISNIS Trades & Tenders, January 4, 1999 - Part 2

----
<PAGE>

                                                                       Page 19

                                                                  Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Report of Allegheny Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
A. Loving, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

         No purchaser or seller of securities or any other person shall be
entitled to rely upon the foregoing certification for any purpose. The
undersigned expressly disclaim any obligation to update the foregoing
certification except as required by law.

                                                /s/  WILLIAM A. LOVING. JR.
                                                ---------------------------
                                                William A. Loving, Jr.
                                                Chief Executive Officer

                                                May 11, 2007
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

                    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which                           ( print page 67596)                        would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of persona privacy.                

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel Program Project & Small Research Grant; Mitochondria Disorders.                    

*Date:*                         December 10, 2004.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Norman Chang, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-1485,                         *changn@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 10, 2004.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-25579 Filed 11-17-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
### SUBCHAPTER III—MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2023—Pub. L. 117–333, §2(a)(1), Jan. 5, 2023, 136 Stat. 6122, redesignated subchapter II of this chapter as this subchapter.
# L_2023115EN.01004101.xml

| 3.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 115/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 115/41

---

DECISION No 78/2023 OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE ESTABLISHED UNDER THE AGREEMENT ON MUTUAL RECOGNITION BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

of 20 April 2023

related to the listing of Conformity Assessment Bodies under the Sectoral Annex for Electromagnetic Compatibility [2023/902]

THE JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on Mutual Recognition between the European Community and the United States of America and in particular Article 7 and 14,

Whereas the Joint Committee is to take a decision to list a Conformity Assessment Body or Bodies under a Sectoral Annex,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

| 1. | The Conformity Assessment Body indicated in attachment A is added to the list of Conformity Assessment Bodies under column 'EC access to the US market' in Section V of the Sectoral Annex for Electromagnetic Compatibility. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Conformity Assessment Body indicated in attachment A is added to the list of Conformity Assessment Bodies under column 'EC access to the US market' in Section V of the Sectoral Annex for Electromagnetic Compatibility.

| 2. | The specific scopes of listing, in terms of products and conformity assessment procedures, of the Conformity Assessment Body indicated in Attachment A has been agreed by the Parties and will be maintained by them.
  This Decision, done in duplicate, shall be signed by representatives of the Joint Committee who are authorized to act on behalf of the Parties for purposes of amending the Agreement. This Decision shall be effective from the date of the later of these signatures. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The specific scopes of listing, in terms of products and conformity assessment procedures, of the Conformity Assessment Body indicated in Attachment A has been agreed by the Parties and will be maintained by them.

This Decision, done in duplicate, shall be signed by representatives of the Joint Committee who are authorized to act on behalf of the Parties for purposes of amending the Agreement. This Decision shall be effective from the date of the later of these signatures.

On behalf of the United States of America

Sushan DEMIRJIAN

Signed in Washington, on 13 April 2023

On behalf of the European Union

Lucian CERNAT

Signed in Brussels, on 20 April 2023

---

ATTACHMENT A

EC Conformity Assessment Body added to the list of Conformity Assessment Bodies under column 'EC access to the US market' in Section V of the Sectoral Annex for Electromagnetic Compatibility

| Eurofins Electric & Electronics Finland Oy (EEEF) |
| --- |
| Yrttipellontie 6 |
| 90230 Oulu |
| FINLAND |

Eurofins Electric & Electronics Finland Oy (EEEF)

Yrttipellontie 6

90230 Oulu

FINLAND

---
### §405. Printing of illustrations of United States postage stamps

(a) When requested by the Postal Service, the Director of the Government Publishing Office shall print, as a public document for sale by the Superintendent of Documents, illustrations in black and white or in color of postage stamps of the United States, together with such descriptive, historical, and philatelic information with regard to the stamps as the Postal Service deems suitable.

(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of section 505 of title 44, stereotype or electrotype plates, or duplicates thereof, used in the publications authorized to be printed by this section may not be sold or otherwise disposed of.

(Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 724; Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title I, §1301(d), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2537.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Director of the Government Publishing Office" substituted for "Public Printer" in subsec. (a) on authority of section 1301(d) of Pub. L. 113–235, set out as a note under section 301 of Title 44, Public Printing and Documents.

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1971, pursuant to Resolution No. 71–9 of the Board of Governors. See section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note preceding section 101 of this title.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6161** 

PURNELL REW , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v.
ROSE WHITE, RN; M. L. JOHNSON, RN; BONITA BADGETT, RN Coordinator; KEITH DAVIS, Warden , Defendants

– Appellees , and

DEERFIELD MEDICAL DEPT. , Defendant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. ( 1:11

- cv - 01291

- JCC

- JFA )

Submitted : June 14, 2012 Decided: June 19, 2012

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Purnell Rew, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Purnell Rew appeals the district court ’ s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rew v.
White , No. 1:11

- cv - 01291

- JCC

- JFA (E.D. Va. Jan. 17, 2012) . We dispense with oral argument because the fac ts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
B.C.D. 04-8

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

SWKR Operating Company. Inc.

FEB 2 0 2004

This is the decision of the Railroad Retirement Board regarding the

continued status of SWKR Operating Company. Inc. (SWKR) as an employer

under the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231, et seep) (RRA) and the

Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. § 351. et seep) (RUTA).

SWKR was held to be an employer under the Acts effective June 15. 1992.

(B.A. Number 2761)1. SWKR ceased operations on October 31. 2003. Its

assets were sold on that date to San Pedro Operating Railroad Company2.

See Surface Transportation Board decision dated November 21, 2003 (STB

Finance Docket No. 34430). SWKR last compensated employees on

October 30, 2003.

Section 202.11 of the Board's regulations provides that:

The employer status of any company or person shall terminate

whenever such company or person loses any of the characteristics essential to

the existence of an employer status.

Through the sale of its rail and other assets and its cessation of operations,

SWKR has lost the characteristics essential to the existence of an employer

status. Accordingly, the Board holds that SWKR ceased to be an employer

under the Railroad Retirement and Railroad Unemployment Insurance Acts

effective with the close of business on October 31, 2003. Cf. Rev Ruling 82­

99, 1982-2 C.B. 154, wherein the Internal Revenue Service ruled that a 

railroad ceases to be an employer subject to taxes under the Railroad

Retirement Tax Act when the railroad’s employees stop performing services

in connection with the railroad’s carrier activities.

Michael S. Schwartz

V. M. Speakman, Jr.

1 Its name from thattime until December l, 1994, was San Pedro & Southwestern Railway.

2 A coverage determination regarding this company is currently pending.

BA#2761
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 25 (Friday, February 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 5818]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2563]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 25 / Friday, February 6, 2004 / 
Notices

[[Page 5818]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Diamond Lake Restoration Project, Umpqua National Forest, Douglas 
County, OR

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION:  Revised notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact 
statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On April 25, 2003, the USDA Forest Service, published a notice 
of intent in the Federal Register (68 FR 20367) and a revised notice of 
intent (68 FR 65240) to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) 
for the Diamond Lake Restoration Project. The original and revised 
notice of intent (NOI) did not identify the need for a non-significant 
Forest Plan Amendment (Amendment <greek-i>5) for the proposed action. 
The Forest Service is revising the NOI to add a non-significant Forest 
Plan Amendment to the Proposed Action (Alternative 2) to allow the use 
of rotenone (a fish toxicant) within Diamond Lake and Short and Silent 
Creeks, which would not normally occur under Standard and Guideline 
Water Quality/Riparian Areas <greek-i>8 (LRMP IV-60) and Prescription 
C2-IV Fish Habitat Class I and II Streams, Lakes, and Ponds (LRMP IV 
176-178). The non-significant Forest Plan Amendment (Amendment 
<greek-i>5) would apply to this project only; upon completion of the 
Diamond Lake Restoration Project, Standard and Guideline Water Quality/
Riparian Areas <greek-i>8 and Prescription C2-IV would again apply to 
Diamond Lake and Short and Silent Creeks.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sherri L. Chambers, Team Leader, North 
Umpqua Range District, 18782 North Umpqua Highway, Glide, Oregon 97443, 
or (541) 496-3532.

    Dated: February 2, 2004.
James A. Caplan,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 04-2563 Filed 2-5-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
PUBLIC LAW 107–33—AUG. 20, 2001 115 STAT. 215

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 988:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 107–166 (Comm. on Transportation and Infastructure).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 147 (2001):

Aug. 2, considered and passed House.

Aug. 3, considered and passed Senate.

Public Law 107–33

107th Congress

An Act

To designate the United States courthouse located at 40 Centre Street in New

York, New York, as the ‘‘Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The United States courthouse located at 40 Centre Street in

New York, New York, shall be known and designated as the

‘‘Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the United States courthouse

referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the

‘‘Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse’’.

Approved August 20, 2001.

Aug. 20, 2001

[H.R. 988]