alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 28.405 Penalty procedures.

Agencies shall impose and collect civil penalties pursuant to the provisions of the Program Fraud and Civil Remedies Act, 31 U.S.C. sections 3803 (except subsection (c)), 3804, 3805, 3806, 3807, 3808, and 3812, insofar as these provisions are not inconsistent with the requirements herein.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

# DATE AND TIME:

November 18, 2004 (Within a relatively short time after the Commission's open meeting on November 18).

# Place:

Room 3M 4A/B, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.

# Status:

Closed.

# Matters To Be Considered:

Non-Public Investigations and Inquiries, Enforcement Related Matters, and Security of Regulated Facilities.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, Telephone (202) 502-8400.

Chairman Wood and Commissioners Brownell, Kelliher, and Kelly voted to hold a closed meeting on November 18, 2004. The certification of the General Counsel explaining the action closing the meeting is available for public inspection in the Commission's Public Reference Room at 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.

The Chairman and the Commissioners, their assistants, the Commission's Secretary and her assistant, the General Counsel and members of her staff, and a stenographer are expected to attend the meeting. Other staff members from the Commission's program offices who will advise the Commissioners in the matters discussed will also be present.

Linda Mitry,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 04-25557 Filed 11-12-04; 4:18 pm]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marco Community Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Richard Storm, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |     |  |                                            
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------
|Date: November 13, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Richard Storm, Jr.                     
|                        |  |     |  | Richard Storm, Jr., Chief Executive Officer
NRC ANNOUNCES OPPORTUNITY FOR HEARING ON APPLICATION TO RENEW 

OPERATING LICENSES FOR DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has announced the opportunity to request a hearing on 

an application to renew the operating licenses for Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 

2. The Diablo Canyon units are pressurized-water reactors, located in Avila Beach, 12 miles from 

San Luis Obispo, Calif.

Pacific Gas & Electric Co., submitted the renewal application on Nov. 23, 2009. The current 

operating licenses for Units 1 and 2 expire on Nov. 2, 2024, and Aug. 26, 2025, respectively.

 The NRC staff has determined that the application contains sufficient information for the 

agency to formally "docket," or file, the application and begin its technical review. Docketing the 

application does not preclude requesting additional information as the review proceeds; nor does it 

indicate whether the Commission will grant the application. 

 The deadline for requesting a hearing is 60 days following publication of a notice in the 

Federal Register, expected shortly. By that date, petitions must be filed by anyone whose interest 

may be affected by the license renewal and who wishes to participate as a party in the proceeding. 

The notice includes detailed instructions for requesting a hearing through the NRC’s E-filing 

system’s electronic submittal page at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html. For specific 

guidance and instructions on public involvement in hearings visit link at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/adjudicatory/hearing.html. 

 

 Information about the license renewal process can be found on the NRC Web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal.html. The Diablo Canyon renewal 

application is online at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications/diablo-canyon.html. 

### 

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should contact 

the Office of Public Affairs beforehand. 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-004 January 11, 2010
Hogan Lovells US LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in the District of Columbia. “Hogan Lovells” is an international legal practice that includes Hogan Lovells US LLP and Hogan Lovells International LLP, with offices in: Abu Dhabi Alicante Amsterdam Baltimore Beijing Berlin Brussels Caracas Colorado Springs Denver Dubai Dusseldorf Frankfurt Hamburg Hanoi Ho Chi Minh City Hong Kong Houston London Los Angeles Madrid Miami Milan Moscow Munich New York Northern Virginia Paris Philadelphia Prague Rome San Francisco Shanghai Silicon Valley Singapore Tokyo Ulaanbaatar Warsaw Washington DC Associated offices: Budapest Jeddah Riyadh Zagreb. For more information see www.hoganlovells.com \\DC - 023866/000002 - 4662424 v1 Hogan Lovells US LLP Columbia Square 555 Thirteenth Street, NW Washington, DC 20004 T +1 202 637 5600 F +1 202 637 5910 www.hoganlovells.com

May 15, 2013
By Electronic Mail Ms. Esta Rosenberg Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division Office of International Aviation U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: Motion of Mesa Airlines, Inc. for Temporary Waiver of Dormancy Conditions (PHX - MZT),

Dockets DOT-OST-2011-0076 and 2003-16529 Dear Ms. Rosenberg: On behalf of Mesa Airlines, Inc., we have polled the U.S. carrier representatives served with the above-referenced Motion filed on May 13, 2013, and no carrier has objected to the relief sought therein. Sincerely,

Patrick R. Rizzi Counsel patrick.rizzi@hoganlovells.com D +1 202 637 5659 Counsel for Mesa Airlines, Inc.

cc: bob.kneisley@wnco.com; marshall.sinick@squiresanders.com; robert.wirick@aa.com;

francis.heil@aa.com; sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com; sametta.c.barnett@delta.com; jhill@dowlohnes.com; jyoung@yklaw.com; dkirstein@yklaw.com; john.fredericksen@suncountry.com; dan.weiss@united.com; howard_kass@usairways.com; barbara.russell@virginamerica.com; brian.hedberg@dot.gov; esta.rosenberg@dot.gov; brett.kruger@dot.gov; urskr@state.gov; info@airlineinfo.com
#### § 265.34 Conformity with posted signs.

No person shall fail or refuse to comply with officially posted signs of a prohibitory nature or with directions of a uniformed guard.
99–008

107TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 107–349

WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII

WITH RESPECT TO CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED FROM THE COMMITTEE ON RULES

DECEMBER 19, 2001.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mrs. MYRICK, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

R E P O R T

[To accompany H. Res. 321]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 321, by a nonrecord vote to report the same to the

House with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a twothirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is reported from

the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions reported from the

Rules Committee. The rule applies the waiver to any special rule

reported on the legislative day of Thursday, December 20, 2001,

providing for consideration or disposition of a conference report to

accompany the bill (H.R. 3338) making appropriations for Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2002, and

for other purposes.

Æ
#### § 845.201 Purpose.

This subpart prescribes procedures to be followed by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), which are consistent with the Federal Claims Collection Standards (FCCS) (Chapter II of title 4, Code of Federal Regulations), in the collection of debts owed to the Fund.
OPENING REMARKS OF NRC CHAIRMAN GREGORY B. JACZKO AT THE 

COMMISSION MEETING TO DISCUSS INSPECTIONS, TESTS, ANALYSES AND 

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

Good morning. The Commission meets today to discuss the inspections, tests, analyses, 

and acceptance criteria for potential new reactor construction, a program otherwise known as 

ITAAC. Like all of our activities related to construction oversight, this issue has taken on added 

importance given the significant progress on the safety and environmental reviews for new 

reactor design and license applications.

As one of our key construction oversight programs, the ITAAC process is at the heart of 

our efforts to ensure that potential new reactors are constructed in accordance with their designs 

and in a manner that ensures that they can operate safely. Under this process, the licensee bears 

the primary responsibility for developing and conducting the ITAAC, while the NRC has a more 

limited oversight role in reviewing the licensee’s proposed ITAAC and verifying their 

completion through selective inspections. In order for this new process to move forward 

effectively and efficiently, it is critical that licensees be thorough, timely and comprehensive in 

meeting their responsibilities.

In looking back on the history of the current generation of reactors, it’s clear that many of 

the safety issues that they experienced during their early years of operation were rooted in

construction and quality assurance issues. Although operating reactors later achieved a much 

stronger safety performance, we can all agree that we need to avoid those types of early 

problems with new reactors that may be built in the future. Rigorous construction oversight 

through ITAAC, the Construction Reactor Oversight Program, and other inspection activities is 

essential to ensuring that.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-161 August 30, 2011
§ 9800.101 General provisions. ( a ) *In general.* This part contains the rules that the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency (CIGIE) follows in processing requests for records under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552. These rules should be read in conjunction with the text of FOIA and the Uniform Freedom of Information Fee Schedule and Guidelines published by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB Guidelines). Requests made by individuals for records about themselves under the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, are processed under part 9801 as well as under this part.
( b ) *Centralized system.* CIGIE has a centralized system for processing FOIA requests, with one office receiving and coordinating the processing of all FOIA requests made to CIGIE.
( c ) *Authority to grant or deny requests.* The Executive Director of CIGIE, or designee, is authorized to grant or deny any requests for records that are maintained by CIGIE. For purposes of any request for records maintained by the CIGIE Integrity Committee (IC) established under section 11(d) of the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended, 5 U.S.C. app. (Inspector General Act), the designees are the IC Chairperson and IC Vice Chairperson.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-20033 Conference Calendar

FREDDIE ROBIN EDWARDS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SAM NUCHIA; GERALD F. CRAWFORD, Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-94-CV-2650

--------------------- October 22, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Freddie Robin Edwards, a Texas inmate (# 658647), appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his pro se civil rights complaint, in which he had alleged that he was falsely arrested for auto theft in 1992. Edwards argues that the district court erred in determining that his claims were barred by the rule of Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477 (1994), in that he continues to serve a sentence thatNo. 97-20033 - 2 - would be invalidated were his claims found to be meritorious. The court dismissed the complaint after holding a hearing pursuant to Spears v. McCotter , 766 F.2d 179 (5th Cir. 1985). We have reviewed the record and Edwards’ brief and find no reversible error in the district court’s dismissal. See Edwards v. Nuchia , No. H-94-2650 (S.D. Tex. Dec. 24, 1996). The appeal is without arguable merit and is thus frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED. 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. Edwards’ motions to correct his brief to add references to the record, to order production of a transcript of the Spears hearing, to supplement the record with exhibits, for appointment of counsel, and for civil contempt are DENIED. MOTIONS DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Page 11 of 18

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(c)

                        KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 1999-A

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas          Key Bank USA, National Association
fka, Bankers Trust Company                    800 Superior Avenue, 4th Floor
60 Wall Street, 26th floor - MS NYC60-2606    Cleveland, Ohio 44114
New York, NY 10017                            ATTN: President, KER
Attn: Corporate Trust & Agency Group          Phone: (216) 828-4293
Structured Finance                            Fax:   (216) 828-9301
Phone: (212) 250-8522
Fax:   (212) 797-8606

Pursuant to Section 3.09 of the Indenture between KeyCorp Student Loan Trust
1999-A, as Issuer, and Bankers Trust Company, as Indenture Trustee, dated
January 1, 1999, the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) a review of the
activities of the Issuer from January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2003, and of
its performance under the Indenture has been made, and (ii) to the best of my
knowledge, based on such review, the Issuer has fulfilled all its obligations
under the Indenture throughout such period.

                                      KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 1999-A,
                                      as Issuer
                                      by: JPMorgan Chase Bank, as successor in
                                          interest to Bank One, National
                                          Association, successor in its interest
                                          to The First National Bank of Chicago,
                                          not in its individual capacity but
                                          solely as Eligible Lender Trustee

                                      By: /S/ JEFFREY L. KINNEY
                                         ---------------------------------------
Date:  February 6, 2004               Name: Jeffrey L. Kinney
                                      Title: Attorney-in-Fact
### §1533. Children of Civil War veterans

Whenever there is no surviving spouse entitled to pension under section 1532 of this title, the Secretary shall pay to the children of each Civil War veteran who met the service requirements of section 1532 of this title a pension at the monthly rate of $73.13 for one child, plus $8.13 for each additional child, with the total amount equally divided.

(Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1137, §533; Pub. L. 94–169, title I, §106(25), Dec. 23, 1975, 89 Stat. 1018; renumbered §1533 and amended Pub. L. 102–83, §§4(b)(1), (2)(E), 5(a), (c)(1), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 404–406.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), renumbered section 533 of this title as this section.

Pub. L. 102–83, §5(c)(1), substituted "1532" for "532" in two places.

Pub. L. 102–83, §4(b)(1), (2)(E), substituted "Secretary" for "Administrator".

1975—Pub. L. 94–169 substituted "surviving spouse" for "widow".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1975 Amendment

Pub. L. 94–169, title I, §106, Dec. 23, 1975, 89 Stat. 1017, provided that the amendment made by that section is effective Jan. 1, 1976.
### SUBCHAPTER XVIII—RESIDENTIAL SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT FOR STATE PRISONERS
Other Science andTechnology Programs

----
### §5100. Definitions

In this chapter:

(1) The term "claimant" means any individual applying for, or submitting a claim for, any benefit under the laws administered by the Secretary.

(2) The term "notice" means a communication issued through means (including electronic means) prescribed by the Secretary.

(Added Pub. L. 117–168, title VIII, §807(a)(1), Aug. 10, 2022, 136 Stat. 1805.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5100, added Pub. L. 106–475, §2, Nov. 9, 2000, 114 Stat. 2096, defined "claimant", prior to repeal by Pub. L. 117–168, title VIII, §807(a)(1), Aug. 10, 2022, 136 Stat. 1805.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Rule of Construction

Pub. L. 117–168, title VIII, §807(b), Aug. 10, 2022, 136 Stat. 1806, provided that: "None of the amendments made by this section [enacting this section, amending sections 5104, 5104B, 5112, 7104, 7105, 7105A, and 7266 of this title, and repealing former section 5100 of this title] shall be construed to apply section 5104(a) of such title [meaning title 38, United States Code] to decisions of the Board of Veterans' Appeals under chapter 71 of such title."
##### 



Page 17 of 17 Exhibit 99(e) KeyBank National Association, formerly
  known as Key Bank USA, National Association
800 Superior Avenue, 4th Floor
Cleveland, OH 44114
    
    Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas
  formerly known as Bankers Trust Company
  as Indenture Trustee
60 Wall Street, 26th Floor  MS NYC60-2606
New York, NY 10007
 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., formally
known as Bank One, National Association
as Eligible Lender Trustee4 New York Plaza, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10004
 Independent Accountants Report
For KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 1999-A We have examined managements assertion, included in its representation letter dated March 9, 2005
that KeyBank, National Association (KBNA), formerly known as Key Bank USA, National Association, a
wholly owned subsidiary of KeyCorp, complies with sections 4.04, 4.08(a), 4.08(b), 4.08(c), 5.05,
5.06, 5.07 and 5.08 of the KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 1999-A Sale and Servicing Agreement and
sections 1.(a)(xx), 1.(b)(iii), 2 and 3 of the KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 1999-A Administration
Agreement (collectively, the Agreements) as of December 31, 2004 and for the year then ended.
Management is responsible for KBNAs compliance with those requirements. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on managements assertion about KBNAs compliance based on our
examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test
basis, evidence about KBNAs compliance with those requirements and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances, except that in accordance with Section
5.05 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement, our examination assumed the accuracy of reports prepared
by KBNAs student loan processor. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on KBNAs compliance with the
specified requirements. In our opinion, assuming the accuracy of reports prepared by KBNAs student loan processor,
managements assertion that KBNA complied with the aforementioned requirements as of December 31,
2004 and for the year then ended is fairly stated, in all material respects. /s/ Ernst & Young LLP Cleveland, Ohio
March 9, 2005